United States
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|X| QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended OCTOBER 31, 2009
OR
|_| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______________ to _______________
Commission File No. 002-26821
BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
Delaware 61-0143150
(State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
850 Dixie Highway
Louisville, Kentucky 40210
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(502) 585-1100
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
|
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes |X| No |_|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and
posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required
to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to submit and post such files). Yes |_| No |_|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller
reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer |X| Accelerated filer |_|
Non-accelerated filer |_| Smaller reporting company |_|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes | | No |X|
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of
common stock, as of the latest practicable date: November 30, 2009
Class A Common Stock ($.15 par value, voting) 56,601,083
Class B Common Stock ($.15 par value, nonvoting) 90,274,793
BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION
Index to Quarterly Report Form 10-Q
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited) Page
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
Three months ended October 31, 2008 and 2009 3
Six months ended October 31, 2008 and 2009 3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
April 30, 2009 and October 31, 2009 4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Six months ended October 31, 2008 and 2009 5
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements 6 - 13
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations 14 - 24
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 24
Item 4. Controls and Procedures 24
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 25
Item 6. Exhibits 25
Signatures 26
|
2
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
October 31, October 31,
2008 2009 2008 2009
------- ------- -------- --------
Net sales $ 934.7 $ 892.9 $1,724.7 $1,630.8
Excise taxes 196.8 194.1 373.0 361.2
Cost of sales 271.2 255.8 504.2 446.5
------- ------- -------- --------
Gross profit 466.7 443.0 847.5 823.1
Advertising expenses 110.0 92.1 207.0 168.2
Selling, general, and
administrative expenses 139.9 125.1 284.2 242.2
Amortization expense 1.3 1.3 2.6 2.6
Other (income), net (6.2) (1.1) (8.6) (7.5)
------- ------- -------- --------
Operating income 221.7 225.6 362.3 417.6
Interest income 1.7 0.4 3.4 1.4
Interest expense 9.6 7.8 18.8 16.0
------- ------- -------- --------
Income before income taxes 213.8 218.2 346.9 403.0
Income taxes 70.6 70.9 115.5 134.4
------- ------- -------- --------
Net income $ 143.2 $ 147.3 $ 231.4 $ 268.6
======= ======= ======== ========
Earnings per share:
Basic $ 0.95 $ 0.99 $ 1.53 $ 1.80
Diluted $ 0.94 $ 0.99 $ 1.52 $ 1.79
Cash dividends per common share:
Declared -- -- $0.5440 $0.5750
Paid $0.2720 $0.2875 $0.5440 $0.5750
|
See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions)
April 30, October 31,
2009 2009
-------- --------
Assets
------
Cash and cash equivalents $ 340.1 $ 289.3
Accounts receivable, net 367.1 519.1
Inventories:
Barreled whiskey 313.1 300.1
Finished goods 143.3 186.9
Work in process 144.1 138.8
Raw materials and supplies 51.5 64.4
-------- --------
Total inventories 652.0 690.2
Current deferred tax assets 104.9 124.4
Other current assets 109.7 61.4
-------- --------
Total current assets 1,573.8 1,684.4
Property, plant and equipment, net 482.8 473.9
Goodwill 675.0 682.5
Other intangible assets 686.1 688.6
Deferred tax assets 11.0 10.1
Other assets 46.0 45.5
-------- --------
Total assets $3,474.7 $3,585.0
======== ========
Liabilities
-----------
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 326.4 $ 392.2
Accrued income taxes 5.4 6.1
Current deferred tax liabilities 14.3 16.8
Short-term borrowings 336.6 301.9
Current portion of long-term debt 152.9 152.8
-------- --------
Total current liabilities 835.6 869.8
Long-term debt 509.3 508.5
Deferred tax liabilities 79.6 105.2
Accrued pension and other postretirement benefits 175.6 169.2
Other liabilities 58.8 58.1
-------- --------
Total liabilities 1,658.9 1,710.8
Stockholders' Equity
--------------------
Common stock:
Class A, voting (57,000,000 shares
authorized; 56,964,000 shares issued) 8.5 8.5
Class B, nonvoting (100,000,000 shares
authorized; 99,363,000 shares issued) 14.9 14.9
Additional paid-in capital 67.6 67.3
Retained earnings 2,189.2 2,372.0
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (133.0) (122.8)
Treasury stock, at cost
(6,200,000 and 9,156,000 shares at
April 30 and October 31, respectively) (331.4) (465.7)
-------- --------
Total stockholders' equity 1,815.8 1,874.2
-------- --------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $3,474.7 $3,585.0
======== ========
|
See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions)
Six Months Ended
October 31,
2008 2009
------- -------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 231.4 $ 268.6
Adjustments to reconcile net income to
net cash provided by operations:
Non-cash agave inventory write-down 22.4 --
Depreciation and amortization 26.6 28.6
Loss on sale of property, plant,
and equipment 3.5 --
Stock-based compensation expense 4.6 3.9
Deferred income taxes (3.1) 7.8
Changes in assets and liabilities (169.2) (103.2)
------- -------
Cash provided by operating activities 116.2 205.7
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to property, plant, and equipment (26.3) (12.4)
Computer software expenditures (1.9) (1.8)
------- -------
Cash used for investing activities (28.2) (14.2)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net change in short-term borrowings 220.4 (34.7)
Repayment of long-term debt (2.2) (1.6)
Net payments related to exercise
of stock options (4.2) (1.4)
Excess tax benefits from stock options 3.4 1.9
Acquisition of treasury stock (0.3) (139.0)
Dividends paid (82.2) (85.8)
------- -------
Cash provided by (used for)
financing activities 134.9 (260.6)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and
cash equivalents (15.0) 18.3
------- -------
Net increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents 207.9 (50.8)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 118.9 340.1
------- -------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 326.8 $ 289.3
======= =======
|
See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
In these notes, "we," "us," and "our" refer to Brown-Forman Corporation.
1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
We prepared the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission ("SEC") for interim financial information. In accordance with those
rules and regulations, we condensed or omitted certain information and
disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). We
suggest that you read these condensed financial statements together with the
financial statements and footnotes included in our annual report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2009 (the "2009 Annual Report").
In our opinion, we included all of the adjustments (which include only normal,
recurring adjustments, unless otherwise noted) needed for a fair presentation of
the accompanying financial statements. We have performed an evaluation of
subsequent events through December 9, 2009, the date on which we issued and
filed the accompanying financial statements with the SEC.
We prepared the accompanying financial statements on a basis that is
substantially consistent with the accounting principles applied in our 2009
Annual Report, except that during the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we adopted
new accounting standards regarding:
- accounting for and disclosing information about transactions in which control
is obtained over another business (i.e., business combinations);
- measuring and disclosing the fair value of certain nonfinancial assets and
liabilities;
- accounting for and disclosing information about events that occur after the
balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are
available to be issued;
- the treatment of unvested share-based awards, such as restricted stock, in
the calculation of earnings per share; and
- disclosing the fair value of financial instruments in interim financial
statements.
Also, in June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")
established the FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("Codification") as the
single source (other than rules and interpretive releases of the SEC) of
authoritative GAAP for nongovernmental entities. The Codification, which is not
intended to change GAAP, is effective for financial statements issued for
periods ending after September 15, 2009, including the accompanying financial
statements for the periods ended October 31, 2009.
Our adoption of these new accounting standards had no material impact on our
financial statements.
6
2. Inventories
We use the last-in, first-out ("LIFO") method to determine the cost of most of
our inventories. If the LIFO method had not been used, inventories at current
cost would have been $188.5 million higher than reported as of April 30, 2009,
and $206.0 million higher than reported as of October 31, 2009. Changes in the
LIFO valuation reserve for interim periods are based on a proportionate
allocation of the estimated change for the entire fiscal year.
During the three months ended July 31, 2008, we recorded a $22.4 million
provision for inventory losses (which was included in cost of sales) resulting
from abnormally high levels of mortality and disease in some of our agave
fields.
3. Income Taxes
Our consolidated quarterly effective tax rate is based upon our expected annual
operating income, statutory tax rates, and income tax laws in the various
jurisdictions in which we operate. Significant or unusual items, including
adjustments to accruals for tax uncertainties, are recognized in the quarter in
which the related event occurs. The effective tax rate of 33.4% for the six
months ended October 31, 2009, is based on an expected tax rate from operations
of 32.4% on ordinary income for the full fiscal year, the recognition of
additional tax expense related to a discrete item arising in the first quarter,
and interest on previously provided tax contingencies. Our expected tax rate
from operations includes current fiscal year additions for existing tax
contingency items.
We believe it is reasonably possible that there may be a net increase in our
gross unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $1.4 million in the next 12
months as a result of tax positions taken in the current period and expirations
of statutes of limitations.
We file income tax returns in the U.S., including several state and local
jurisdictions, as well as in several other countries throughout the world in
which we conduct business. The major jurisdictions and their earliest fiscal
years that are currently open for tax examinations are 1998 in the U.S., 2007 in
Mexico, 2006 in Australia, 2005 in Ireland and Italy, 2004 in Poland and
Finland, and 2002 in the U.K. Audits of our fiscal 2006 and 2007 U.S. federal
tax returns, which were initiated during fiscal 2009, remain open.
4. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income available to
common stockholders by the weighted average number of all unrestricted common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share further
includes the dilutive effect of stock options, stock-settled appreciation rights
("SSARs"), and restricted stock units ("RSUs"). Stock-based awards for
approximately 1,438,000 common shares and 1,345,000 common shares were excluded
from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the periods ended October
31, 2008 and 2009, respectively, because the exercise price of the awards was
greater than the average market price of the shares.
7
We have granted restricted shares of common stock to certain employees as part
of their compensation. These restricted shares, which have varying vesting
periods, contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends declared on common stock. As
a result, the unvested restricted shares are considered participating securities
in the calculation of earnings per share in accordance with a new accounting
standard that we adopted retrospectively effective May 1, 2009. The adoption
decreased previously reported basic earnings per share for the six months ended
October 31, 2008, from $1.54 to $1.53. No other earnings per share amounts
reported for the period ended October 31, 2008, changed as a result of adopting
the new accounting standard.
The following table presents information concerning basic and diluted earnings
per share:
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
October 31, October 31,
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts) 2008 2009 2008 2009
------- ------- ------- -------
Basic and diluted net income $143.2 $147.3 $231.4 $268.6
Income allocated to participating
securities (restricted shares) (0.2) (0.2) (0.3) (0.3)
------- ------- ------- -------
Net income available to common stockholders $143.0 $147.1 $231.1 $268.3
======= ======= ======= =======
Share data (in thousands):
Basic average common shares outstanding 150,661 147,992 150,630 148,797
Dilutive effect of stock options,
SSARs and RSUs 1,030 702 1,115 684
------- ------- ------- -------
Diluted average common shares outstanding 151,691 148,694 151,745 149,481
======= ======= ======= =======
Basic earnings per share $0.95 $0.99 $1.53 $1.80
Diluted earnings per share $0.94 $0.99 $1.52 $1.79
|
5. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
The following table shows the components of the pension and other postretirement
benefit expense recognized during the periods covered by this report:
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
October 31, October 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2008 2009 2008 2009
------ ------ ------ ------
Pension Benefits:
Service cost $3.4 $2.7 $ 6.7 $ 5.4
Interest cost 7.5 8.1 15.1 16.2
Expected return on plan assets (8.7) (8.6) (17.4) (17.1)
Amortization of:
Prior service cost 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5
Net actuarial loss 1.6 1.0 3.2 1.9
------ ------ ------ ------
Net expense $4.0 $3.4 $ 8.0 $ 6.9
====== ====== ====== ======
Other Postretirement Benefits:
Service cost $0.3 $0.2 $ 0.6 $0.4
Interest cost 0.9 0.9 1.7 1.7
------ ------ ------ ------
Net expense $1.2 $1.1 $ 2.3 $2.1
====== ====== ====== ======
|
8
6. Contingencies
We operate in a litigious environment, and we are sued in the normal course of
business. Sometimes plaintiffs seek substantial damages. Significant judgment is
required in predicting the outcome of these suits and claims, many of which take
years to adjudicate. We accrue estimated costs for a contingency when we believe
that a loss is probable and we can make a reasonable estimate of the loss, and
then adjust the accrual as appropriate to reflect changes in facts and
circumstances.
7. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income is a broad measure of the effects of all transactions and
events (other than investments by or distributions to stockholders) that are
recognized in stockholders' equity, regardless of whether those transactions and
events are included in net income. The following table adjusts the Company's net
income for the other items included in the determination of comprehensive
income:
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
October 31, October 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2008 2009 2008 2009
------ ------ ------ ------
Net income $143.2 $147.3 $231.4 $268.6
Other comprehensive income (loss),
net of tax:
Net gain (loss) on cash flow hedges 24.1 (2.5) 26.1 (18.1)
Postretirement benefits adjustment 1.1 0.5 1.9 1.3
Foreign currency translation adjustment (109.1) 11.9 (99.4) 27.0
------ ------ ------ ------
(83.9) 9.9 (71.4) 10.2
------ ------ ------ ------
Comprehensive income $ 59.3 $157.2 $160.0 $278.8
====== ====== ====== ======
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, consisted of the
following:
(Dollars in millions) April 30, October 31,
2009 2009
------ ------
Postretirement benefits adjustment $(127.2) $(125.9)
Cumulative translation adjustment (10.3) 16.7
Unrealized gain (loss) on
cash flow hedge contracts 4.5 (13.6)
------ ------
$(133.0) $(122.8)
====== ======
|
9
8. Derivative Financial Instruments
Our multinational business exposes us to global market risks, including the
effect of fluctuations in currency exchange rates, commodity prices, and
interest rates. We use derivatives to manage financial exposures that occur in
the normal course of business. We formally document the purpose of each
derivative contract, which includes linking the contract to the financial
exposure it is designed to mitigate. We do not hold or issue derivatives for
trading purposes.
We use currency derivative contracts to limit our exposure to the currency
exchange risk that we cannot mitigate internally by using netting strategies. We
designate most of these contracts as cash flow hedges of forecasted transactions
(expected to occur within three years). We record all changes in the fair value
of cash flow hedges (except any ineffective portion) in accumulated other
comprehensive income ("AOCI") until the underlying hedged transaction occurs, at
which time we reclassify that amount into earnings. We designate some of our
currency derivatives as hedges of net investments in foreign subsidiaries. We
record all changes in the fair value of net investment hedges (except any
ineffective portion) in the cumulative translation adjustment component of AOCI.
We assess the effectiveness of our hedges based on changes in forward exchange
rates. The ineffective portion of the changes in fair value of our hedges
(recognized immediately in earnings) during the periods presented in this report
was not material.
We do not designate some of our currency derivatives as hedges because we use
them to at least partially offset the immediate earnings impact of changes in
foreign exchange rates on existing assets or liabilities. We immediately
recognize the change in fair value of these contracts in earnings.
As of October 31, 2009, we had outstanding foreign currency contracts with a
total notional amount of $389.4 million, related primarily to our euro, British
pound, and Australian dollar exposures.
We also had outstanding exchange-traded futures and options contracts on three
million bushels of corn as of October 31, 2009. We use these contracts to
mitigate our exposure to corn price volatility. Because we do not designate
these contracts as hedges for accounting purposes, we immediately recognize the
changes in their fair value in earnings.
10
This table presents the fair values of derivative instruments included on our
consolidated balance sheet as of October 31, 2009:
(Dollars in millions) Amount Classification
Derivatives in a gain position:
Currency derivatives designated as cash flow hedges $ 0.6 Other current assets
Currency derivatives designated as cash flow hedges 0.2 Other assets
Currency derivatives designated as cash flow hedges 0.3 Accrued expenses
Currency derivatives designated as cash flow hedges 0.8 Other liabilities
------
1.9
------
Currency derivatives not designated as hedges 4.3 Other current assets
Derivatives in a (loss) position:
Currency derivatives designated as cash flow hedges (35.8) Accrued expenses
Currency derivatives designated as cash flow hedges (2.2) Other liabilities
------
(38.0)
------
Currency derivatives designated as net investment hedges (3.3) Other current assets
Commodity derivatives not designated as hedges (0.3) Accrued expenses
------
Net (loss) position $(35.4)
======
|
This table presents the amounts affecting our consolidated statement of
operations for the quarter ended October 31, 2009:
(Dollars in millions) Amount Classification
Currency derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:
Net (loss) recognized in AOCI $(9.1) N/A
Net (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income (5.1) Net sales
Currency derivatives designated as net investment hedges:
Net (loss) recognized in AOCI (0.5) N/A
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Currency derivatives - net (loss) recognized in income (5.0) Net sales
Currency derivatives - net (loss) recognized in income (4.3) Other income
Commodity derivatives - net gain recognized in income 0.2 Cost of sales
|
This table presents the amounts affecting our consolidated statement of
operations for the six months ended October 31, 2009:
(Dollars in millions) Amount Classification
Currency derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:
Net (loss) recognized in AOCI $(32.1) N/A
Net (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income (2.0) Net sales
Currency derivatives designated as net investment hedges:
Net (loss) recognized in AOCI (3.3) N/A
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Currency derivatives - net (loss) recognized in income (11.1) Net sales
Currency derivatives - net (loss) recognized in income (1.7) Other income
Commodity derivatives - net (loss) recognized in income (1.0) Cost of sales
|
11
We expect to reclassify $23.1 million of deferred net losses recorded in AOCI as
of October 31, 2009, to earnings during the next 12 months. Such
reclassification would offset the anticipated earnings impact of the underlying
hedged exposures. The actual amounts that we ultimately reclassify to earnings
will depend on the exchange rates in effect when the underlying hedged
transactions occur. The maximum term of our contracts outstanding at October 31,
2009 is 21 months.
We are exposed to credit-related losses if the other parties to our derivative
contracts breach them. This credit risk is limited to the fair value of the
contracts. To manage this risk, we enter into contracts only with major
financial institutions that have earned investment-grade credit ratings; we have
established counterparty credit guidelines that are regularly monitored and that
provide for reports to senior management according to prescribed guidelines; and
we monetize contracts when we believe it is warranted. Because of the safeguards
we have put in place, we believe the risk of loss from counterparty default to
be immaterial.
Some of our derivative instruments require us to maintain a specific level of
creditworthiness, which we have maintained. If our creditworthiness were to fall
below such level, then the counterparties to these derivative instruments could
request immediate payment or collateralization for derivative instruments in net
liability positions. As of October 31, 2009, the aggregate fair value of all
derivatives with creditworthiness requirements that were in a net liability
position was $11.9 million.
9. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of cash, cash equivalents, and short-term borrowings approximates
the carrying amount due to the short maturities of these instruments. We
estimate the fair value of long-term debt using discounted cash flows based on
our incremental borrowing rates for similar debt. The fair value of commodity
and foreign currency contracts is determined as discussed in Note 10. As of
October 31, 2009, the fair values and carrying amounts of these instruments were
as follows:
(Dollars in millions) Carrying Fair
Amount Value
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $289.3 $289.3
Foreign currency contracts 1.8 1.8
Liabilities:
Commodity contracts 0.3 0.3
Foreign currency contracts 36.9 36.9
Short-term borrowings 301.9 301.9
Current portion of long-term debt 152.8 152.7
Long-term debt 508.5 546.4
|
12
10. Fair Value Measurements
The fair values of assets and liabilities are categorized into three levels
based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to determine those values. Level 1
provides the most reliable measure of fair value, while Level 3 generally
requires significant management judgment. The three levels are:
- Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets
or liabilities.
- Level 2: Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1, such as
quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted
prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are
not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be derived from or
corroborated by observable market data.
- Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market
activity.
As of October 31, 2009, the fair values of our financial assets and liabilities
are as follows:
(Dollars in millions) Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Assets:
Foreign currency contracts $ 1.8 -- $ 1.8 --
Liabilities:
Commodity contracts 0.3 0.3 -- --
Foreign currency contracts 36.9 -- 36.9 --
|
The fair value of commodity contracts is based on quoted prices in active
markets. The fair value of foreign exchange contracts is determined through
pricing models or formulas using observable market data.
13
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
You should read the following discussion and analysis along with our 2009 Annual
Report. Note that the results of operations for the six months ended October 31,
2009, do not necessarily indicate what our operating results for the full fiscal
year will be. In this Item, "we," "us," and "our" refer to Brown-Forman
Corporation.
Important Note on Forward-Looking Statements:
This report contains statements, estimates, and projections that are
"forward-looking statements" as defined under U.S. federal securities laws.
Words such as "expect," "believe," "intend," "estimate," "will," "may,"
"anticipate," "project," and similar words identify forward-looking statements,
which speak only as of the date we make them. Except as required by law, we do
not intend to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a
result of new information, future events, or otherwise. By their nature,
forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors (many
beyond our control) that could cause our actual results to differ materially
from our historical experience or from our current expectations or projections.
These risks and other factors include, but are not limited to:
- prolonged or deepening global economic downturn or renewed turmoil in
financial and equity markets (and related credit and capital market
instability and illiquidity; decreased consumer and trade spending;
higher unemployment; supplier, customer or consumer credit or other
financial problems; inventory fluctuations at distributors, wholesalers,
or retailers; bank failures or governmental nationalizations; etc.)
- competitors' pricing actions (including price reductions, promotions,
discounting, couponing or free goods), marketing, product introductions,
or other competitive activities aimed at our brands
- trade or consumer reaction to our product line extensions or new marketing
initiatives
- prolonged or deeper declines in consumer confidence or spending, whether
related to global economic conditions, wars, natural disasters, pandemics
(such as swine flu), terrorist attacks or other factors
- changes in tax rates (including excise, sales, corporate, individual income,
dividends, capital gains) or in related reserves, changes in tax rules
(e.g., LIFO, foreign income deferral, U.S. manufacturing deduction) or
accounting standards, tariffs, or other restrictions affecting beverage
alcohol, and the unpredictability and suddenness with which they can occur
- trade or consumer resistance to price increases in our products
- tighter governmental restrictions on our ability to produce, sell, or market
our products, including advertising and promotion
- business disruption, decline or costs related to reductions in workforce
or other cost-cutting measures
- lower returns on pension assets, higher interest rates on debt,
or significant changes in recent inflation rates (whether up or down)
- fluctuations in the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies, especially
the euro, British pound, Australian dollar, or Polish zloty
- changes in consumer behavior including further reduction of bar, restaurant,
hotel and other on-premise business; shifts to discount store purchases
or shifts away from premium-priced products; other price-sensitive consumer
behavior; or further reductions in travel
14
- changes in consumer preferences, societal attitudes or cultural trends that
result in reduced consumption of our products
- distribution arrangement decisions that affect the timing of our sales,
temporarily disrupt the marketing or sale of our products, or that result
in implementation-related costs
- adverse impacts resulting from our acquisitions, dispositions, joint
ventures, business partnerships, or portfolio strategies
- lower profits, due to factors such as fewer used barrel sales, lower
production volumes (either for our own brands or those of third parties),
sales mix shift toward lower priced or lower margin skus, or cost increases
in energy or raw materials, such as grapes, grain, agave, wood, glass,
plastic, or closures
- climatic changes, agricultural uncertainties, our suppliers' financial
hardships or other factors that affect the availability or quality
of grapes, agave, grain, glass, closures, plastic, or wood
- negative publicity related to our company, brands, personnel, operations,
business performance or prospects
- product counterfeiting, tampering, or contamination and resulting negative
effects on our sales, brand equity, or corporate reputation
- adverse developments stemming from state, federal or other governmental
investigations of beverage alcohol industry business, trade, or marketing
practices by us, our distributors, or retailers
- impairment in the recorded value of any assets, including receivables,
inventory, fixed assets, goodwill or other intangibles
15
Results of Operations:
Second Quarter Fiscal 2010 Compared to Second Quarter Fiscal 2009
A summary of our operating performance (dollars expressed in millions, except
per share amounts) is presented below.
Three Months Ended
October 31,
2008 2009 Change
------ ------ ------
Net sales $934.7 $892.9 (4%)
Gross profit 466.7 443.0 (5%)
Advertising expenses 110.0 92.1 (16%)
Selling, general, and
administrative expenses 139.9 125.1 (11%)
Amortization expense 1.3 1.3
Other (income), net (6.2) (1.1)
Operating income 221.7 225.6 2%
Interest expense, net 7.9 7.4
Income before income taxes 213.8 218.2 2%
Income taxes 70.6 70.9
Net income 143.2 147.3 3%
Gross margin 49.9% 49.6%
Effective tax rate 33.0% 32.5%
Earnings per share:
Basic $0.95 $0.99 5%
Diluted 0.94 0.99 5%
|
Net sales for the three months ended October 31, 2009 were $892.9 million, down
$41.8 million or 4% compared to the same prior year period. The major factors
driving the decrease in net sales were the loss of sales associated with sold
and discontinued brands and a reduction in U.S. trade inventory levels compared
to the same period last year when inventory levels were up significantly in
anticipation of a stronger holiday season than occurred. Several brands,
including Jack Daniel's & Cola, Tuaca, Sonoma-Cutrer, Early Times, and New Mix
registered growth in net sales in the period, while net sales declined for
Southern Comfort and Finlandia. Jack Daniel's net sales dropped modestly in the
quarter compared to the same prior year period reflecting lower volumes and a
shift in size, channel, and country mix. On a geographic basis, our overall net
sales grew in several markets including Australia, Germany, and the U.K., while
net sales declined in the U.S., Poland, and South Africa.
16
The components of the 4% decrease in net sales for the quarter were:
Change vs.
Prior Period
Estimated net change in trade inventories(1) (2%)
Discontinued brands(2) (1%)
Underlying change(3) in net sales (1%)
-----
Reported change in net sales (4%)
=====
|
Gross profit decreased $23.7 million, or 5% from the second quarter of last
year. The same factors that drove the decrease in net sales for the quarter also
contributed to the decline in gross profit for the same period. A shift in sales
mix in terms of channel, market, brands, and size, and an increase in
value-added packaging contributed to both reported and underlying gross profit
changes lagging reported and underlying net sales trends. Gross margin of 49.6%
approximated the gross margin for the same prior year period.
The following table shows the major factors influencing the changes in gross
profit for the quarter:
Change vs.
Prior Period
Underlying change in gross profit (3%)
Estimated net change in trade inventories (3%)
Discontinued brands (0%)
Foreign exchange(4) 1%
-----
Reported change in gross profit (5%)
=====
--------
|
(1) Refers to the estimated financial impact of changes in wholesale trade
inventories for our company's brands. We compute this effect using our
estimated depletion trends and separately identify trade inventory changes
in the variance analysis for our key measures. Based on the estimated
depletions and the fluctuations in trade inventory levels, we then adjust
the percentage variances from prior to current periods for our key measures.
We believe it is important to separately identify the impact of this item in
order for management and investors to understand the results of our business
that can arise from varying levels of wholesale inventories.
(2) Refers to both the company's December 2008 sale of its Bolla and Fontana
Candida Italian wine brands to Gruppo Italiano Vini (GIV) and to the impact
of certain agency brands distributed in various geographies that exited our
portfolio during the comparable period.
(3) Underlying change represents the percentage increase or decrease in
reported financial results in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) in the United States, adjusted for certain items.
We believe presenting the underlying change helps provide transparency
to our comparable business performance.
(4) Refers to net gains and losses incurred by us relating to sales and
purchases in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. We use the measure
to understand the growth of the business on a constant dollar basis as
fluctuations in exchange rates can distort the underlying growth of our
business (both positively and negatively). To neutralize the effect of
foreign exchange fluctuations, we have historically translated current year
results at prior year rates. While we recognize that foreign exchange
volatility is a reality for a global company, we routinely review our
company's performance on a constant currency basis. We believe this allows
both management and our investors to understand better our company's
underlying business performance.
17
Advertising expenses decreased $17.9 million, or 16%, reflecting the impact of a
stronger U.S. dollar, the absence of spending behind discontinued brands, a
seasonal shift in advertising and promotional investments to later in the fiscal
year, and a continuation of reallocating brand investments to other activities
such as value-added packaging and targeted consumer price promotions, which are
classified elsewhere in the statement of operations. In addition, more efficient
investments on some elements of our marketing mix (i.e., more media impression
this quarter versus last quarter at a lower cost), and the marketing benefit
that is provided by our ready-to-drink expressions, also contributed to the
lower spending in the quarter.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $14.8 million, or 11%,
reflecting the impact of a stronger U.S. dollar, the benefit of the actions we
took in fiscal 2009 to reduce our cost base including an early retirement
program and an overall reduction in workforce, the timing of some activities,
and the continued tight management of discretionary expenses.
Operating income increased $3.9 million, up 2% from the same period last year.
The major factor driving the growth in both reported and underlying operating
income was lower operating expenses. Estimated trade inventory changes and the
absence of discontinued brands decreased operating income for the quarter. The
following table summarizes the major factors influencing the change in operating
income for the quarter:
Change vs.
Prior Period
Estimated net change in trade inventories (7%)
Discontinued brands (1%)
Foreign exchange 1%
Underlying change in operating income 9%
-----
Reported change in operating income 2%
=====
|
Net interest expense decreased by $0.5 million, reflecting lower net debt and a
reduction in short-term interest borrowing rates compared to a year ago.
The effective tax rate in the quarter was 32.5% compared to 33.0% reported in
the second quarter of fiscal 2009. The reduction in tax rate is largely due to
our expectation of a lower rate from operations resulting from higher projected
foreign earnings and the benefit of a deduction for amortization of an
intangible asset.
Reported diluted earnings per share of $0.99 for the quarter increased 5% from
the $0.94 earned in the same prior year period. The same factors that boosted
the increase in operating income also contributed to the gain in earnings per
share. In addition, earnings per share benefitted from a lower effective tax
rate and fewer shares outstanding resulting from our share repurchase activity
authorized in December 2008.
18
Results of Operations:
Six Months Fiscal 2010 Compared to Six Months Fiscal 2009
Six Months Ended
October 31,
2008 2009 Change
------ ------ ------
Net sales $1,724.7 $1,630.8 (5%)
Gross profit 847.5 823.1 (3%)
Advertising expenses 207.0 168.2 (19%)
Selling, general, and
administrative expenses 284.2 242.2 (15%)
Amortization expense 2.6 2.6
Other (income), net (8.6) (7.5)
Operating income 362.3 417.6 15%
Interest expense, net 15.4 14.6
Income before income taxes 346.9 403.0 16%
Income taxes 115.5 134.4
Net income 231.4 268.6 16%
Gross margin 49.1% 50.5%
Effective tax rate 33.3% 33.4%
Earnings per share:
Basic $1.53 $1.80 18%
Diluted 1.52 1.79 18%
|
Net sales for the six months ended October 31, 2009 were down $93.9 million, or
5% compared to the same prior-year period. The major factors driving the
decrease in net sales were:
Change vs.
Prior Period
Foreign exchange (3%)
Discontinued brands (2%)
Estimated net change in trade inventories (1%)
Underlying change in net sales 0%
Excise tax increases(5) 1%
-----
Reported change in net sales (5%)
=====
|
Underlying net sales through October were flat versus prior year despite net
sales growth registered for several brands in our portfolio including Jack
Daniel's & Cola, Jack Daniel's Tennessee Whiskey, el Jimador, Gentleman Jack,
Woodford Reserve, and our new Southern Comfort Ready-To-Pour (RTP). Lower net
sales for brands such as Southern Comfort and Finlandia offset the growth
recorded by these brands. Australia, France, and Germany were the most
significant geographies that experienced underlying growth in net sales while
net sales dropped in several countries including Poland, the U.S., and South
Africa. Our results were negatively affected by the continued decline in the
on-premise channel and trading down by consumers. More specifically, for the
first six months of the fiscal year:
(5) Refers to the impact of the additional revenues related to excise tax
increases implemented during the period, primarily in Australia, Poland,
and the U.K. Since net sales are recorded including revenues associated
with excise taxes, we believe it is important to separately identify the
impact of excise tax changes to better understand the changes in sales.
19
- Jack Daniel's Tennessee Whiskey net sales declined in the low and mid single
digits, respectively, on a reported and constant currency basis. Global
depletions(6) improved in the second quarter but remain down 1% for the
first six months of the fiscal year. The brand has registered gains in
Australia, France, and Germany, while declining in its two largest markets,
the U.S. and the U.K. Gentleman Jack's net sales grew at a double-digit
rate on both a reported and a constant currency basis for the six month
period.
- Jack Daniel's & Cola registered significant double-digit growth in net sales
on both a reported and underlying basis as the brand experienced depressed
results in the comparable period last year that followed the April 2008
unexpected significant increase of the ready-to-drink tax in Australia.
The brand has also benefited from strong gains in Germany as well as
geographic expansion in Mexico and the U.K.
- Finlandia global net sales declined significantly on both a reported and
constant currency basis reflecting soft trends in Eastern Europe,
particularly Poland, due to trading down within the brand to smaller sizes,
softer sales of higher-margin flavored vodkas, and inventory reductions at
the retail levels, which occurred in the first quarter of this fiscal year.
- Southern Comfort global net sales on both a reported and constant currency
basis declined in the high-single digits during the first half of the fiscal
year. We believe Southern Comfort's negative trends continue to be
influenced by weakness in the on-premise channel around the world. Southern
Comfort ready-to-pour expressions have generated incremental sales through
the first six months of the fiscal year as consumers have purchased these
on-premise-type cocktails for off-premise consumptions.
- el Jimador experienced strong growth in both constant currency net sales and
depletions as positive consumer and trade response to the brand's
reformulation and repackaging continued in both Mexico and the U.S.
Our gross profit decreased $24.4 million, or 3%, due primarily to the effects of
a strong dollar, a decrease in trade inventories, and the loss of gross profit
from discontinued brands. The absence of last year's first quarter $22.4 million
non-cash inventory write-down related to agave plants partially offset these
factors.
(6) Depletions are shipments direct to retail or from distributors to wholesale
and retail customers, and are commonly regarded in the industry as an
approximate measure of consumer demand.
20
The following table shows the major factors influencing the change in gross
profit for the period:
Change vs.
Prior Period
Foreign exchange (2%)
Estimated net change in trade inventories (2%)
Discontinued brands (1%)
Underlying change in gross profit (1%)
Non-cash agave inventory write-down(7) 3%
-----
Reported change in gross profit (3%)
=====
|
Despite flat underlying net sales for the six-month period, underlying gross
profit declined 1% due in part to a larger proportion of net sales generated
this fiscal year by lower margin products such as Jack Daniel's & Cola.
Our overall gross margin as a percent of net sales improved 1.4% points for the
first six months of the fiscal year due primarily to the absence of both the
non-cash agave inventory write-down and profits associated with lower margin
sold or discontinued brands from our portfolio. Excluding these items, gross
margins declined modestly compared to a year ago due in part to the lower margin
ready-to-drink brands representing a larger share of our total business.
Advertising investments were down $38.8 million or 19% for the first half of the
fiscal year compared to the first half of last year due in part to the impact of
a stronger U.S. dollar and the absence of spending behind brands that are no
longer in our portfolio. Excluding these items, advertising investments remained
significantly below the same period last year, primarily reflecting a shift in
investments to the second half of the fiscal year and a continued reallocation
of brand investment to other activities such as value-added packaging and
targeted consumer price promotions, neither of which is reflected in advertising
expense.
Selling, general, and administrative expenses decreased $42.0 million, or 15%,
over the first half of last year. Several factors influenced this reduction in
spending including the impact of a stronger U.S. dollar, the benefit of the
actions we took during fiscal 2009 to reduce our cost base including an early
retirement program and an overall reduction in workforce, the timing of some
activities, and the continued tight management of discretionary expenses.
Operating income increased $55.3 million, or 15%, compared to the first half of
last year. Operating income benefited from planned cost savings and
efficiencies, a shift in advertising and selling, general, and administrative
spending to the second half of the fiscal year, and the absence of the $22.4
million non-cash agave inventory write-down in last year's first quarter. These
positive factors were only partially offset by a reduction in net trade
inventory levels and the loss of profits associated with discontinued brands.
(7) Refers to an abnormal number of agave plants identified during the first
quarter of fiscal 2009 as dead or dying. Although agricultural
uncertainties are inherent in our tequila or any other business including
the growth and harvesting of raw materials, we believe that the magnitude
of this item distorts the underlying trends of our business.
21
The following table summarizes the major factors influencing the change in
operating income for the period:
Change vs.
Prior Period
Estimated net change in trade inventories (5%)
Discontinued brands (2%)
Non-cash agave inventory write-down 7%
Underlying change in operating income 15%
-----
Reported change in operating income 15%
=====
|
Net interest expense decreased by $0.8 million, reflecting lower net debt and a
reduction in short-term interest borrowing rates compared to a year ago.
The effective tax rate for the first half of the year was 33.4%, compared to
33.3% reported in the first half of fiscal 2009.
Reported diluted earnings per share of $1.79 for the first six months increased
18% from the $1.52 earned in the same prior year period. Underlying growth in
operating income, a reduction in net interest expense, and fewer shares
outstanding resulting from our share repurchase activity authorized in December
2008, boosted the growth in earnings per share for the six months ended October
2009 compared to the same prior year period.
FULL-YEAR OUTLOOK
We are increasing and narrowing the range of our fiscal 2010 full-year earnings
outlook to $2.95 to $3.15 per share. Depletion trends for many of our brands
improved slightly in the second quarter when compared to the first quarter and
we expect favorable comparisons as the year progresses. However, we remain
concerned about the impact on consumption trends from a soft on-premise channel,
consumer trading-down, and heightened competitive activity. While we anticipate
operating expense reductions for the full fiscal year, trends through October
are expected to moderate and potentially reverse during the next six months as
advertising and promotion activities are more heavily weighted to the second
half of the year. Additionally, declines in selling, general, and administrative
expenses in the first half of this fiscal year are not expected to recur in the
second half of the year due primarily to the timing of cost reductions realized
in the prior year. We intend to remain flexible with operating expense plans and
we believe we are in a position to increase investments if conditions warrant.
The outlook reflects expected costs related to increased investments in brand
packaging, other brand innovations, and production enhancements. Separately,
there are a number of distribution contracts, primarily in Europe, that expire
at the end of our fiscal year and early next fiscal year. We are currently
evaluating alternatives and weighing various considerations as to any possible
changes that may result. As a result, our full-year outlook does not include any
estimates of potential one-time effects that may occur.
22
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2009, includes a
discussion of our critical accounting estimates, including those related to the
valuation of our brand names.
We assess each of our brand names for impairment at least annually to ensure
that the estimated fair value continues to exceed the related book value. A
brand name is impaired if its book value exceeds estimated fair value. Fair
value is determined using discounted estimated future cash flows and
consideration of market values for similar assets when available. If the fair
value of an evaluated brand name is less than its book value, the asset is
written down to fair value. Considerable management judgment is necessary to
assess impairment and estimate fair value. The assumptions used in our
evaluations, such as forecasted growth rates and cost of capital, are consistent
with our internal projections and operating plans.
While the global economic environment has affected the performance of some of
our super-premium priced brands given their dependence on the on-premise
channel, management concluded during the second quarter of fiscal 2010 that no
events had resulted requiring an interim impairment analysis of any of our brand
names. In accordance with our policy, we will test several brand names,
including the brand names with the most significant value and most exposed to
the economic downturn (Chambord and Herradura), during our third quarter. The
book values of the Chambord and Herradura brand names at October 31, 2009 are
$116.4 million and $124.2 million, respectively. The performance of the brands
during the critical holiday season is important in assessing the overall trends
and brand name values.
LIQUIDITY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
Cash and cash equivalents declined $50.8 million during the six months ended
October 31, 2009, compared to an increase of $207.9 million during the same
period last year. Cash provided by operations was $205.7 million, up from $116.2
million for the same six-month period last year, primarily reflecting a lower
seasonal increase in working capital and higher earnings (excluding non-cash
items). Cash used for investing activities declined from last year by $14.0
million due largely to lower capital expenditures. Cash used for financing
activities was $395.5 million more than last year, primarily reflecting a $254.5
million increase in net debt repayments and a $138.7 million increase in share
repurchases. The impact on cash and cash equivalents as a result of exchange
rate changes was an increase of $18.3 million for the six months ended October
31, 2009, compared to a decrease of $15.0 million for the same period last year.
In addition to our cash flow from operations, we have access to other liquidity
sources. Our commercial paper program, supported by our bank credit facility,
continues to fund our short-term credit needs at attractive interest rates. Our
commercial paper has enjoyed steady demand from investors. If we could no longer
get short-term funding in the commercial paper market, we expect that we could
satisfy our liquidity needs by drawing on our $800 million bank credit facility.
This facility expires April 30, 2012, and carries favorable terms compared with
current market conditions. Under extreme market conditions, it is possible this
agreement might not be fully funded. While we are alert to this uncertainty,
because the health of the global banking system appears to be improving and the
markets for investment-grade bonds and private placements are currently robust,
we believe these should provide a source of long-term financing that we could
use to pay off our short-term debt if necessary.
23
Our credit facility includes only one financial covenant, which requires that
our consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the agreement) to consolidated interest
expense not be less than a ratio of 3 to 1. At October 31, 2009, with a ratio of
approximately 23 to 1, we were well within this covenant's parameters. No
borrowings were outstanding under the credit facility as of October 31, 2009.
We have been closely monitoring our counterparty risks with respect to our cash
balances and derivative contracts (that is, foreign currency and commodity
hedges) and have unwound exposures when prudent. Absent significant further
deterioration of market conditions, we believe our current liquidity position is
strong and sufficient to meet all of our financial commitments for the
foreseeable future, including the maturity of $150 million in floating rate
notes on April 1, 2010.
In December 2008, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized the
repurchase of up to a total of $250 million of our outstanding Class A and Class
B common shares over the succeeding 12 months, subject to market conditions.
Under this plan, which expired at the close of business on December 3, 2009, we
repurchased a total of 4,249,039 shares (23,788 of Class A and 4,225,251 of
Class B) for approximately $195.7 million. The average repurchase price per
share, including broker commissions, was $47.13 for Class A and $46.06 for Class
B.
On November 16, 2009, our Board of Directors approved a regular quarterly cash
dividend of $0.30 per share on Class A and Class B common stock, representing a
dividend per share increase of 4.3%. Stockholders of record on December 7, 2009,
will receive the cash dividend on January 4, 2010.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We hold debt obligations, foreign currency forward and option contracts, and
commodity futures contracts that are exposed to risk from changes in interest
rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and commodity prices, respectively.
Established procedures and internal processes govern the management of these
market risks.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and the Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") of
Brown-Forman (its principal executive and principal financial officers) have
evaluated the effectiveness of the company's "disclosure controls and
procedures" (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the company's
disclosure controls and procedures: are effective to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by the company in the reports filed or submitted by it
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within
the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms; and include controls
and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
the company in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the company's
management, including the CEO and the CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. There has been no change in the
company's internal control over financial reporting during the most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting.
24
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table provides information about shares of our common stock that
we repurchased during the quarter ended October 31, 2009:
Total Number of Approximate Dollar
Total Shares Purchased Value of Shares
Number of Average as Part of that May Yet Be
Shares Price Paid Publicly Announced Purchased Under the
Period Purchased per Share Plans or Programs Plans or Programs
August 1, 2009 - August 31, 2009 530,469 $43.74 530,469 $137,500,000
September 1, 2009 - September 30, 2009 506,780 $47.90 506,780 $113,200,000
October 1, 2009 - October 31, 2009 828,784 $48.78 828,784 $ 72,700,000
Total 1,866,033 $47.11 1,866,033
|
As announced on December 4, 2008, our Board of Directors authorized the
repurchase of up to a total of $250.0 million of outstanding Class A and Class B
common stock over the succeeding 12 months, subject to market conditions. The
shares presented in the above table were acquired as part of this repurchase
plan, which expired at the close of business on December 3, 2009.
Item 6. Exhibits
31.1 CEO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
31.2 CFO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
32 CEO and CFO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(not considered to be filed).
25
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION
(Registrant)
Date: December 9, 2009 By: /s/ Donald C. Berg
Donald C. Berg
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
(On behalf of the Registrant and
as Principal Financial Officer)
|
26
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Paul C. Varga, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Brown-Forman
Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.
Date: December 9, 2009 By: /s/ Paul C. Varga
Paul C. Varga
Chief Executive Officer
|
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Donald C. Berg, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Brown-Forman
Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.
Date: December 9, 2009 By: /s/ Donald C. Berg
Donald C. Berg
Chief Financial Officer
|
Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brown-Forman Corporation ("the
Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in the capacity as an
officer of the Company, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: December 9, 2009 By: /s/ Paul C. Varga
Paul C. Varga
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
By: /s/ Donald C. Berg
Donald C. Berg
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
|
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906 and is
not being filed as part of the Periodic Report.
Brown Forman (NYSE:BF.B)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Jun 2024 bis Jul 2024
Brown Forman (NYSE:BF.B)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Jul 2023 bis Jul 2024