The following individuals are our named executive officers for fiscal year 2020 as listed in the Summary Compensation Table below (the “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”).
Bradley H. Feldmann
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Anshooman Aga
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Michael Knowles
|
Senior Vice President of Cubic and President of Cubic Mission and Performance Solutions
|
Grace G. Lee
|
Senior Vice President of Cubic and Chief Human Resources and Diversity Officer
|
Jeffrey B. Lowinger
|
Senior Vice President of Cubic and President of Cubic Transportation Systems
|
Michael R. Twyman(1)
|
Former Senior Vice President of Cubic and President of Cubic Mission Solutions
|
41
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
|
|
|
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the Company’s compensation philosophy and the objectives of the Company’s compensation program for its executive officers, including the NEOs, and how the Executive Compensation Committee oversees the executive compensation program. This Compensation Discussion and Analysis also describes the compensation determination process for fiscal year 2020 and how each element of compensation was determined.
SECTION 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A Focus on Resiliency and Agility in a Year of Unprecedented Global Crisis
COVID-19, officially declared a global pandemic in March 2020, has presented challenges and impacts on each of our businesses and our financial performance for the fiscal year. At the onset of the pandemic, Cubic’s customers (primarily U.S. and foreign state, regional and local governmental agencies) dramatically shifted their focus to safety, crisis management and budget conservation. Our customers in the public transportation sector have faced unprecedented challenges in 2020 as they continue to deliver an essential service to provide safe mobility options for travelers, but with greatly reduce operating revenues from all funding sources, especially public transit ridership, which plummeted by 90% in some cities.
While Cubic has not experienced any cancelations of existing projects and our pipeline remains robust, our financial results in fiscal year 2020 were impacted by delays in new awards and, to a lesser extent, lower ridership, and we expect this dynamic to continue until the funding situation and operating environment improves for our customers. In our Defense business, we have also experienced delays in new orders as well as a slowdown of training exercises. We estimate that the COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted Sales by up to $73 million and Adjusted EBITDA by up to $28 million during fiscal year 2020. While the estimated impacts of COVID-19 may not have been overly material to Cubic’s operations, relative to the ambitious manner in which Cubic established its incentive plan goals for fiscal year 2020, we believe these reductions had a significant negative impact on award calculations.
Against a backdrop of economic challenges and uncertainty, we continued to advance our strategic priorities and delivered good financial performance, which is summarized in the Financial Performance discussion below.
Resilience to the Pandemic
Beginning in March 2020, Cubic took decisive action to respond to the unprecedented disruption and related risks surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic and to protect the interests of the Company, our employees, our customers, our shareholders and our other stakeholders. To guide the Company’s efforts throughout the pandemic, the Cubic leadership team focused on three main priorities — Care for our People, Care for our Employees and Focus on Essentials. We believe that our strong culture and talented, experienced teams have enabled us to effectively address these priorities and our results and progress this year demonstrate that. We imposed mandatory stay-at-home remote work except for essential work, including our service associates who continued to serve our customers, and our production associates, who continued to work to meet customer commitments. Our 6,000 talented employees have done an excellent job delivering mission critical solutions to our customers during these increasingly complex times while safeguarding the well-being of our teams. As a result of the Company’s proactive measures, our operations did not miss any production days and did not have any significant disruption to our business. Importantly, the Company has no reported cases of employee-to-employee contraction of COVID-19.
42
The table below summarizes the key areas of focus and actions taken by the Company in response to the challenges in fiscal year 2020 relating to the business disruption and risks surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic.
Our Focus
|
What We Did
|
Launched NextCUBIC Strategy - underpinned by a robust outside-in assessment - to drive a step change in value creation and deliver sustainable financial improvement through both functional and cultural transformation in the way we work.
|
Employees and Community
|
• Effective actions to keep employees safe and to monitor employee well-being; no reported cases of employee-to-employee contraction
○ Increased frequency of cleaning/sanitation; social distancing and additional protocols for “site essential” employees, including mandatory face coverings
○ Implemented contact tracing and comprehensive protocols at all global sites for confirmed and suspected COVID-19 cases
• Transitioned approximately 75% of the global workforce to telework
• Implemented paid time-off policy to allow flexibility for employees who could not perform work due to restrictions as a result of COVID-19; implemented paid sick time globally for anyone affected by COVID-19
• Digital workforce enablement and focus on cyber security to enable effective telework
• Repurposed manufacturing capabilities to provide face coverings to all employees
• Employee care and actions taken following events of social injustice in the U.S. amid an already challenging environment with the COVID-19 pandemic (e.g., implemented new, mandatory Inclusion training course, globally); continued focus on progressing Diversity and Inclusion as a strategic priority
• Frequent, effective communications from CEO and COVID-19 taskforce
• Continued focus on engagement (won San Diego Union-Tribune's Top Workplaces; achieved a company-record engagement score)
• Preparedness of workforce for post-COVID-19 recovery and rebound
• Continued ESG initiatives, including helping our communities and charitable contributions; enhanced level of ESG disclosures on the Company’s website
• Speed and fairness of changes (e.g., executive vs. employee pay cuts)
|
Customers and
Business Continuity
|
• Ensured supply chain and manufacturing continuity
• Maintained on-time delivery during pandemic; major projects remained on track
• Repurposed manufacturing capabilities to provide face coverings to customers
• Proactive discussions with customers surrounding risk management and preparedness
• Launched three mobile apps for transit customers (i.e., D.C., Los Angeles, and Chicago), giving travelers a convenient, safe way to pay for their journeys
• Conversations with transit customer senior executives to serve their immediate needs to enhance safety and provide insights to support rebound
• Continued to advance key pursuits in support of the national defense strategy (e.g., won high capacity backbone prototype for the U.S. Air Force)
|
43
Our Focus
|
What We Did
|
Launched NextCUBIC Strategy - underpinned by a robust outside-in assessment - to drive a step change in value creation and deliver sustainable financial improvement through both functional and cultural transformation in the way we work.
|
Financial Discipline
|
• Reduced Board and CEO cash compensation 15%; CFO 7.5% (May to fiscal 2020 year-end)
• Suspended employee salary merit increases through fiscal year 2021 and 401(k) retirement contributions (May to fiscal 2020 year-end)
• Debt restructuring enhanced flexibility; new term loan and upsized revolver (i.e., 30% additional capacity), attractive rates and improved covenants
• Focused on reducing net leverage
• Instituted an indirect/overhead position hiring freeze and control measures
• Reduced/deferred select expenses
|
Shareholders
|
• Took prudent action to withdraw guidance considering macro uncertainty; provided color on business environment, key assumptions and expectations
• Frequent engagement with the investment community, including robust business updates
• Strong focus on safety, customer commitments, business continuity, along with cost savings program and debt restructuring, supported the achievement of good financial results despite COVID-19 challenges
• Maintained the payment of dividends to our shareholders
• Continued key investments to support innovation and future growth
• Driving growth, operational excellence and culture to deliver long-term, sustainable shareholder value through recently launched NextCUBIC strategy
|
Actions taken by the Executive Compensation Committee
The Committee’s decision process takes into consideration the unforeseen effect of COVID-19 and the resulting impact to our performance-based compensation, and the impact to Cubic’s stakeholders, including our employees and shareholders. From the period of March 2020 at the onset of the pandemic through the end of the fiscal year, the Committee had seven meetings to discuss the available alternatives. The Committee also exercised its discretion under our plans to determine the best way to compensate management in a fair manner while ensuring the long-term sustainability of our business. The Executive Compensation Committee ensured that the actions taken to address our long-term performance incentive programs align with the long-term interests of our shareholders and the interests of management.
Annual Incentive Plan
The Executive Compensation Committee considered a number of factors, including the unprecedented global crisis due to the pandemic and its impact on Cubic’s financial performance, and management’s actions in managing the company throughout the pandemic, in its effort to meet and exceed customer commitments and care for employees and stakeholders.
• As a result of the uncertainty and the unforeseen impact of the pandemic, the Company withdrew its guidance. The Committee did not reset its performance targets as the impact of the pandemic was uncertain and unpredictable, and decided that it would instead exercise its discretionary authority under the plan.
• In recognition of the need to focus management on key priorities to navigate the impact of the pandemic, the Committee identified four main areas of focus. The Committee identified the resiliency factors described above to address ongoing business operations as well as the long-term sustainability of Cubic. The Committee indicated that any application of discretion at the end of the year would be guided by the Company’s resilience in these areas.
44
• The Committee reviewed management’s execution against these priorities and noted its strong performance against objectives, and noted the achievements compared to the prior year.
• The Committee also reviewed management’s care for its employees, noting Cubic had a record employee engagement result as well as being named as a Top Workplace.
• Based on these contributions, the Committee established a funding cap, well below target, of 60% of target on average for the NEOs (and 70% of target for any individual NEO), compared to the 20.6% otherwise achieved for the Corporate NEOs under the annual incentive plan formula. Details of this formula-based achievement is on page 58.
Market-based Base Salary Adjustments
• The Executive Compensation Committee approved adjustments to the NEOs’ base salaries for fiscal year 2020 in November of 2019 prior to the pandemic. This was completed based on its review of comparable company data and an evaluation of the NEOs’ individual performance.
• Mr. Feldmann’s base salary was increased by 3.7% over fiscal year 2019.
• Current NEOs’ base salary increases averaged 6.4% over fiscal year 2019. This average excludes the increase for Mr. Knowles which represents a market adjustment in connection with increased responsibilities as president of Cubic Global Defense, as well as Jeff Lowinger who was hired on April 27, 2020.
• Following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, all base salaries have been frozen for fiscal year 2021 except for changes in responsibilities resulting in a promotion.
• From May 2020 to the end of the fiscal year, Mr. Feldmann elected to take a reduction in pay of 15% of his base salary. From May 2020 to the end of the fiscal year, Mr. Aga elected to take a reduction in pay of 7.5% of his base salary. From May 2020 to the end of the fiscal year, the Board elected to take a reduction in pay of 15% of their annual retainer.
Key Performance Objectives During Fiscal Year 2020 for the Annual Incentive Plan
Our executive compensation program is designed to drive the achievement of our strategic objectives and financial goals, while aligning the interests of our executive officers with those of our shareholders. The Executive Compensation Committee reviews our executive compensation program on an annual basis to ensure consistency with our philosophy. Compensation awarded to our Named Executive Officers for fiscal year 2020 reflected the strategic achievements and financial results and supports the overall compensation philosophy.
The Executive Compensation Committee primarily used three financial metrics for fiscal year 2020 to determine the annual incentive payable to the Company’s Named Executive Officers.
For fiscal year 2020, Sales, Adjusted EBITDA and cash flow were the financial metrics used by the Executive Compensation Committee to evaluate our financial performance under the Company’s fiscal year 2020 annual incentive program. Our consolidated performance for fiscal year 2020 for these metrics, relative to fiscal year 2019 consolidated performance, is reflected in the table below.
Financial Measure
|
Fiscal Year 2019
(in millions)
|
Fiscal Year 2020
(in millions)
|
Increase (decrease)
|
Sales
|
$ 1,496.5
|
$ 1,476.2
|
(1.35%)
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
$ 146.6
|
$ 158.3
|
+7.98%
|
Operating Cash Flows
(excluding the VIE)
|
$ 18.3
|
$ 104.2
|
+469%
|
45
2020 Performance Highlights
We delivered strong year-over-year financial performance and other significant achievements during fiscal year 2020, including:
• Responded to the challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic by transitioning our team members to a remote work configuration while keeping the Company on track to meet customer commitments through robust business continuity and safety measures.
• Sales in fiscal year 2020 were comparable to the prior year at $1,476 million; Adjusted EBITDA increased 8% to $158 million, a company record; Adjusted EBITDA margin expanded 90 basis points to 10.7%; strong cash flow of $104.2 million.
• Generated a Book to Bill ratio of 1.14 (>1.0 in all segments); backlog at year-end was strong at $3.7 billion.
• Continued to deliver on our major fare collection projects, on schedule, including our roll out of the One Metro New York (OMNY) system, successfully reaching our goal to bring OMNY to all subway stations and buses by the end of 2020.
• Launched three new mobile apps for our transit customers in Washington D.C., Los Angeles and Chicago.
• Advanced our strategic priorities, including key awards such as:
○ Five-year extension to upgrade Chicago’s Ventra fare collection system
○ High Capacity Backbone prototype for U.S. Air Force
○ Advanced Battle Management System multiple award, indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (“IDIQ”) for U.S. Air Force
○ Next-generation Troposcatter system for U.S. Marine Corps
○ Surface Training Immersive Gaming and Simulations for U.S. Navy (single award, IDIQ)
• Completed a debt restructuring, which provided additional capacity, more favorable terms and less restrictive covenants.
• Implemented cost-reduction measures to offset certain unfavorable financial impacts related to the pandemic, including a. temporary reduction of pay for the CEO, CFO and Board.
• Strong emphasis on our people. Employee engagement reached a record of 82%.
• Cared for our people in response to the events of racial injustice in the United States. Enabled an environment for employees globally to share and learn in our “Safe Room” discussions.
• Recipient of the 2020 Top Workplaces award from the San Diego Union Tribune.
• Launched NextCUBIC strategy - underpinned by a comprehensive outside-in assessment — which focuses on growth, operational excellence and culture.
○ Began implementation phase including the first key action: combining the Company’s defense business segments to drive superior customer value and enhance operational effectiveness.
46
In fiscal year 2020, Sales were $1,476 million, compared to $1,496 million in fiscal year 2019. We estimate that the negative impacts related to the COVID-19 pandemic totalled up to $73 million, primarily reflecting delayed orders and lower transit ridership. Adjusted EBITDA increased 8% to $158.3 million and Adjusted EBITDA margin increased 90 basis points to 10.7%, as strong performance in Transportation, coupled with the contribution of the high-margin Pixia acquisition and company-wide cost management initiatives, more than offset investments in Mission Solutions and the impacts related to COVID-19.
Net loss from continuing operations was $3.7 million, or $0.12 per share, compared to net income from continuing operations attributable to Cubic of $51.1 million in fiscal year 2019, or $1.67 per share, primarily reflecting lower operating income, a $16.1 million loss on extinguishment of debt and higher interest expense, which was partially offset by an income tax benefit of $6.4 million, compared to an income tax expense of $11.0 million in fiscal year 2019. Additionally, prior year results included a $32.5 million gain on sale of fixed assets. Adjusted net income increased to $103.8 million, or $3.32 per share, compared to Adjusted net income of $95.6 million in fiscal year 2019, or $3.13 per share. The table below reconciles Adjusted EPS to GAAP EPS. Please see pages 47 through 48 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on November 18, 2020, for a reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA.
47
GAAP Net Income to Adjusted Net Income
and GAAP EPS to Adjusted EPS Reconciliation
(in millions, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
Year Ended September 30,
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2020
|
GAAP EPS
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
1.67
|
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
GAAP Net income from continuing operations attributable to Cubic
|
|
$
|
8.1
|
|
|
$
|
51.1
|
|
|
$
|
(3.7
|
)
|
Noncontrolling interest in the income (loss) of the VIE
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(9.8
|
)
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
Amortization of purchased intangibles
|
|
|
27.1
|
|
|
|
42.1
|
|
|
|
59.3
|
|
Gain on sale of fixed assets
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(32.5
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
Acquisition related expenses, excluding amortization
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
Strategic and IT system resource planning expenses
|
|
|
24.1
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Other non-operating expense, net
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
28.8
|
|
Noncontrolling interest in Adjusted Net Income of VIE
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(9.7
|
)
|
|
|
(24.6
|
)
|
Tax impact related to acquisitions(1)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
|
(12.4
|
)
|
Impact of US Tax Reform
|
|
|
(7.0
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
Tax impact related to non-GAAP adjustments(2)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
Adjusted Net Income
|
|
$
|
60.0
|
|
|
$
|
95.6
|
|
|
$
|
103.8
|
|
Adjusted EPS
|
|
$
|
2.19
|
|
|
$
|
3.13
|
|
|
$
|
3.32
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding (in thousands)
|
|
|
27,351
|
|
|
|
30,606
|
|
|
|
31,299
|
|
48
2020 Compensation Elements
Three primary elements make up our executive compensation program: base salary, annual incentives and long-term incentives. The chart below summarizes these compensation elements for fiscal year 2020, which are described in more detail in the discussion that follows.
|
|
WHAT?
|
Cash
|
Cash
|
Equity
|
Equity
|
WHEN?
|
Annual
|
Annual
|
Time-based
Three equal
annual installments
|
3-year
Performance Period
|
WHY?
|
Provide a competitive level of base cash compensation to attract and retain talented leaders
|
Motivate and reward the achievement of short-term, company-wide, business segment and individual objectives, weighted towards key financial targets
|
Drive the achievement of specific long-term financial performance goals and stock price growth
|
HOW?
|
|
CEO and CFO and CHRDO:
Measures and % weighting
10% Sales
60% Adjusted EBITDA
20% Operating Cash Flow
10% Digital Strategy
|
|
I. Annual Sales growth (50% weight)
○ Cumulative over three years
II. Annual Adjusted EBITDA growth (50% weight)
○ Cumulative over three years
|
|
|
Other NEOs:
Measures and % weighting
20% Segment Adjusted EBITDA
10% Segment Operating Cash Flow 60% Company Adjusted EBITDA 10% Digital Strategy
|
|
III. TSR multiplier
○ Total award multiplied by 75% to 125% depending on TSR relative to Russell 2000 for performance period
|
|
|
Payout % of Target:
Company and Segment metrics 0-200%
Individual multiplier 0-120%
Maximum payout 250% of target
|
|
PRSU Vesting:
0-200%
|
49
Fiscal Year Target Total Compensation Mix
The charts below show that the significant majority of target total direct compensation for our NEOs is variable or “at-risk,” and tied to achievement of performance objectives or stock price performance.
2020 Key Executive Compensation Outcomes
• Market-based Base Salary Adjustments. The Executive Compensation Committee approved adjustments to the NEOs’ base salaries for fiscal year 2020 based on its review of comparable company data and an evaluation of the NEOs’ individual performance. Mr. Feldmann’s base salary was increased by 3.7% over fiscal year 2019, while the other current NEOs’ base salary increases averaged 6.4% over fiscal year 2019. This average excludes the increase for Mr. Knowles which represents a market adjustment in connection with increased responsibilities as president of Cubic Global Defense, as well as Jeff Lowinger who was hired on April 27, 2020.
• Annual Incentive Plan. The Executive Compensation Committee has full discretion as to the form and amount of the annual incentive payments to our NEOs. In the current environment with the global pandemic affecting more than half of the fiscal year, fiscal year 2020 has been a challenging year. Cubic delivers essential, mission critical solutions and our leadership team demonstrated unwavering commitment to serving our customers during unprecedented times. They took significant action to navigate the ongoing pandemic, including measures to safeguard our employees, which is our top priority, ensure business continuity, and mitigate the impacts and risks associated with COVID-19. In recognition of the challenges the corporation has faced and the resiliency NEOs exhibited despite these challenges, the Compensation Committee decided to apply positive discretion to the fiscal year 2020 annual incentive payout. For the NEOs, discretion was applied to the annual incentive payouts to provide incremental payments ranging from 9.8% to 38.4% of the NEOs’ target amounts. The Executive Compensation Committee also approved individual performance multipliers for the NEOs ranging from 1.00 to 1.10.
• Vesting of Fiscal Year 2018-2020 PRSUs. For the fiscal year 2018 performance restricted stock unit grant (PRSU), the performance of the three-year cumulative results achieved a vesting of 160% following the performance period from 2018 to 2020. Sales attained 200% of target, Adjusted EBITDA attained 200% of target, and return on equity (“ROE”) fell below threshold levels for the three-year performance period. These results combined to produce an earned PRSU award equal to 160% of target. Below is a table representing the three-year performance period.
Fiscal Year 2018 PRSUs
|
|
Financial Measure
|
Weighting
|
Achievement 2018 to 2020
(in millions)
|
Target 2018 to 2020
(in millions)
|
Attainment
|
|
|
3-Year Cumulative
|
3-Year Cumulative
|
|
Sales
|
40%
|
$3,959
|
$3,655
|
200%
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
40%
|
$397
|
$334
|
200%
|
Return on Equity (%)
|
20%
|
2.4%
|
8%
|
0%
|
Total Vesting
|
|
|
|
160%
|
50
Response to the 2020 Say-On-Pay Vote and Key Changes to Compensation Program
As described in Proposal 2, Cubic seeks an annual non-binding advisory say-on-pay vote from its shareholders to approve the compensation of its Named Executive Officers as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and other related tables and disclosure.
In February 2020, we held our most recent say-on-pay vote, with approximately 92% of shareholder votes cast in favor of our 2020 say-on-pay resolution (excluding abstentions and broker non-votes). While this represented overwhelming support of our executive compensation program, our Executive Compensation Committee takes into consideration the outcome of our say-on-pay votes as they review executive compensation decisions.
Based in part on feedback from discussions with shareholders following our two most recent say-on-pay votes and, in part, on its reevaluation of our compensation program and advice from its independent compensation consultant to better align our program with shareholder interests, the Executive Compensation Committee implemented certain changes to our executive compensation program for fiscal year 2020 and fiscal year 2021, as described below.
Key Changes to Executive Compensation Program For Fiscal Year 2020
As disclosed in our 2019 proxy statement, our executive compensation program for fiscal year 2020 contains a few key changes to the annual incentive awards and RSUs and PRSUs.
• Annual Incentive Plan. For fiscal year 2020, the Executive Compensation Committee replaced the invested capital and asset turnover metrics with cash flow to reflect feedback from shareholders and our financial priorities for fiscal year 2020.
• PRSUs. Fiscal year 2020 PRSU awards incorporate the following key changes:
○ Completing our transition to a performance-based and shareholder return focused long-term incentive plan, the fiscal year 2020 PRSUs return to the measurement of Sales growth and Adjusted EBITDA growth against three-year cumulative performance goals. In addition, Sales growth and Adjusted EBITDA growth will be calculated in a manner to exclude the effect of acquisitions or divestitures, unless otherwise directed by the Executive Compensation Committee, and will be calculated in a manner to exclude the effect of foreign exchange rates.
○ The TSR modifier, relative to the Russell 2000 (up or down by 25%), is unchanged from the 2019 awards, but the modifier is capped at 1.0 if Cubic’s absolute TSR is negative over the three-year performance period.
○ The total shares that may be earned at the end of the three-year performance period is capped at 200% of the target number of PRSUs.
○ Replaced single-trigger vesting upon a change in control with a double-trigger provision.
• RSUs. Fiscal year 2020 RSU awards will vest ratably over three years, consistent with competitive norms.
Key Changes to Executive Compensation Program for Fiscal Year 2021
In response to the business environment and the COVID-19 pandemic, which continues to impact our customers and our businesses, some changes were made to our Short-Term and Long-Term incentive programs for fiscal year 2021 relative to our Annual Incentive Plan and PRSU program, which comprise 50% of our long-term equity incentive program.
• Annual Incentive Plan
○ Corporate Plan Components. For fiscal year 2021, the Executive Compensation Committee replaced the goal for Digital Strategy to NextCUBIC, with a weighting of 30% due to its strategic importance. NextCUBIC is the transformational strategic plan for Cubic Corporation. The other components are: Sales with a 10% weighting, Adjusted EBITDA with a 40% weighting, and cash flow with a 20% weighting.
51
○ Segment Plan Components. For fiscal year 2021, the segment plan has NextCUBIC replacing Digital Strategy, also weighted at 30%. The other components are: Segment adjusted EBITDA with a 20% weighting, Segment cash flow with a 20% weighting, and consolidated adjusted EBITDA with a 30% weighting.
○ Threshold. The vesting threshold for Adjusted EBITDA has been changed from 93% to 82%.
• PRSUs (2021-2023)
○ The vesting of the 2021-2023 PRSUs will be determined based on the compound annual growth rates of Sales and Adjusted EBITDA achieved over the three-year performance period. The annual rates used in the compound annual growth rates for the vesting threshold, target, and maximum amounts for the 2021-2023 PRSUs have been modified as follows:
■ Threshold. The vesting threshold for Sales has been reduced from 2.5% to 2.0% annual growth and the threshold for Adjusted EBITDA has been reduced from 2.75% to 2.25% annual growth.
■ Target. The target for Sales has been reduced from 6% to 5% annual growth and the target for Adjusted EBITDA has been reduced from 6.5% to 5.5% annual growth.
■ Maximum. The maximum for Sales of 8.5% annual growth and Adjusted EBITDA of 9.25% growth has not changed.
Review of Executive Compensation Best Practices
Below is a summary of best practices we have implemented and practices we avoid.
Our Executive Compensation Best Practices
|
ü
|
Stock ownership guidelines apply to both executive officers and directors
|
ü
|
Independent compensation consultant
|
ü
|
Claw-back policy for incentive compensation
|
ü
|
No tax gross-ups
|
ü
|
“Double trigger” change-in-control agreements
|
ü
|
No employment contracts
|
ü
|
Modest perquisites
|
ü
|
No hedging by executive officers and directors
|
ü
|
Long-term equity incentive award program aligns executive incentives with shareholder interests
|
ü
|
No repricing of stock options without shareholder approval
|
ü
|
Executive compensation program that received strong shareholder response (92% of votes cast in favor) in 2020 and (96% of votes cast in favor) in 2019 say-on-pay vote
|
|
|
SECTION 2: KEY OBJECTIVES AND SETTING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Guiding Principles and Objectives
We align the interests of management with those of shareholders and other stakeholders through our executive compensation programs to ensure Cubic’s future as a technology-driven, market-leading global company that makes the world better through innovation, technology solutions, and world-class products. Our policies intend to support the development of a strong executive team provided with appropriate incentives that support the business strategy, build and retain the team and address different risks associated with compensation. We strive to provide a total compensation package that fairly and equitably rewards our leadership team as a team and as individuals, from each of whom we expect superior performance. Our total direct compensation program is designed so that majority of pay is variable or “at risk,” with emphasis on performance over the long term.
52
Our executive compensation and benefits programs are guided by the following principles:
Pay for Performance
• Our incentive programs are tied to multiple growth goals that we believe are leading indicators of shareholder value to be achieved in manners consistent with our values.
• We measure performance as a team and by each individual executive’s contribution to outcomes.
Retention of a Strong Leadership Team
• Compensation opportunities are intended to be competitive against our peers and broader industry competitors for talent. By allowing pay to exceed median when performance warrants, we expect to be able to attract and retain the kind of leadership that is demanded by the complexity of opportunities and challenges in our business.
Aligned with Shareholder Interests
• We balance fixed and variable compensation opportunities to manage risk while emphasizing performance.
• All of our long-term incentives are earned in the form of equity that vests over time on the basis of performance and/or continued contribution.
• Stock ownership guidelines and our compensation recovery policy encourage long-term results for shareholders.
Use of Comparable Company Compensation Data
• Our pay opportunities and our compensation programs are reviewed against a peer group and comparable company data and best practices, as further described below, and are modified when we can better attract, retain, and motivate as a result.
• We strive to establish overall target compensation at the median for seasoned performers, but our actual compensation can vary between the lower and the upper quartiles based on delivered performance, with such variances determined at the discretion of our Executive Compensation Committee.
Pay Positioning
• Our Executive Compensation Committee reviews competitive peer and survey compensation at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles in order to understand how the marketplace pays for roles similar to our NEOs. Without targeting a specific percentile for target total direct compensation, the Executive Compensation Committee expects that actual executive compensation will vary between the lower and the upper quartiles based on experience and delivered performance.
○ In setting fiscal year 2020 executive compensation, after a review of the comparable company data, the Executive Compensation Committee noted that Mr. Feldmann’s total direct target compensation was below the median of chief executives at comparable companies in the peer group and survey data. After evaluating his performance and experience, the Executive Compensation Committee approved increases to Mr. Feldmann’s base salary and long-term incentive award target value that brought his total direct target compensation to a level above the 50th percentile of the comparable company data.
53
○ Additionally, the Executive Compensation Committee noted that the total direct target compensation of the other NEOs fell below the 50th percentile of executives in comparable positions and approved recommendations presented by Mr. Feldmann for base salary increases and adjustments to their target long-term incentive award values to bring, on average, total direct compensation approximating the 50th percentile of the comparable company data.
○ While the Executive Compensation Committee used this comparable company data as a guide in determining which compensation components to increase and by how much, the final determinations were not made by reference to specific targeted levels for any of the individual compensation components.
Oversight
• Our compensation programs and their outcomes are approved by an independent Executive Compensation Committee.
• By overseeing the establishment and evolution of policies and programs, the Executive Compensation Committee motivates decision-making and behaviors that deliver value to shareholders and stakeholders within a mandate to build Company sustainability, culture and productivity.
Setting Executive Compensation
Our annual compensation evaluation process includes a review of salary, annual incentives and long-term incentive practices of organizations of similar size, in comparable industries, and specific individuals with relevant responsibilities and experience. In addition to reviewing comparable company data from our identified peer group and third-party compensation consultant surveys, the Executive Compensation Committee also relies on the judgment of its members in making compensation decisions consistent with the guiding principles and objectives of our compensation program described above. After carefully reviewing our performance, as well as evaluating a NEO’s annual performance compared to established goals, leadership qualities, operational performance, business responsibilities, career with our Company, current compensation arrangements and long-term potential to enhance shareholder value, an informed decision is reached. The roles of management, the Executive Compensation Committee and the committee’s independent compensation consultant in setting executive compensation are further described below:
Executive Compensation Committee
|
• Oversees our executive compensation program for executive officers
• Authorized to retain the services of an independent compensation consultant in connection with the oversight of our executive compensation program
• Determines and approves ongoing compensation arrangements for our executive officers and recommends to the Board the compensation for Independent Directors
• Evaluates and approves compensation elements annually
|
Management
|
• CEO provides the Executive Compensation Committee with recommendations regarding salary, annual incentives and equity compensation for the executive officers (other than himself)
• Human resources department assists in the formulation of compensation recommendations to the Executive Compensation Committee, and other executive officers may provide relevant input as needed for persons other than themselves
• CEO and our human resources department support their recommendations regarding executive compensation with competitive market data
|
Independent Compensation Consultant
|
• Reports to the Executive Compensation Committee
• Advises on our compensation levels and compensation program
|
54
In late fiscal year 2019, in preparation for fiscal year 2020 compensation planning, the Executive Compensation Committee independently engaged Pay Governance LLC to provide senior executive compensation and non-employee director compensation advice.
After review and consultation with Pay Governance, the Executive Compensation Committee determined Pay Governance to be independent and that no conflict of interest resulted from retaining Pay Governance during fiscal year 2020. In reaching these conclusions, the Executive Compensation Committee considered the factors set forth in Exchange Act Rule 10C-1 and NYSE listing standards.
Comparable Company Compensation Data and Peer Group Used for Fiscal Year 2020 Executive Compensation Decisions
The Executive Compensation Committee’s annual compensation evaluation process includes a review of the salary, annual incentive and long-term incentive practices of organizations of similar size, in comparable industries, and concerning individuals with relevant responsibilities and experience. The Executive Compensation Committee also reviews recommendations of our CEO and our human resources department that are supported by this competitive market data.
For fiscal year 2020 compensation setting purposes, industry survey data was provided by three independent consulting firms (Radford, Mercer and Willis Towers Watson). These surveys were subscribed to by our human resources department (data is not customized to our Company) and included surveys with both a regional and national focus. These surveys included data from approximately 4,000 companies and included executive and non-executive salaries, annual incentives and long-term incentive compensation data.
Providers of this data do not vary their reports from a standard format, the identities of the individual companies are not included in the surveys, and the Committee did not receive individual compensation information for the companies included in the surveys. Our objective was to obtain data from a broad spectrum of technology and defense companies and also, from public companies with similar revenue levels.
As part of its compensation review, Pay Governance also prepared an independent assessment of competitive compensation levels and incentive practices for the Company’s CEO for fiscal year 2020. The review was based on the survey data provided by our human resources department, as described above, as well as proxy disclosures by a select group of relevant peer companies.
Eighteen peer companies were approved by the Executive Compensation Committee in November 2020 with review and input from Pay Governance and senior management based on industry sector, similarity of business activities, size and performance. The objective was to have a group of companies sufficient in size and relevance to provide meaningful assessments of compensation levels and practices. The peer group used for the fiscal year 2020 compensation setting process included the following defense and technology companies.
AAR Corp
|
FLIR Systems, Inc.
|
Teledyne Technologies, Inc.
|
Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc.
|
HEICO Corporation
|
Teradata Corporation
|
Barnes Group, Inc.
|
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
|
Tyler Technologies, Inc.
|
CAE, Inc.
|
Mercury Systems, Inc.
|
Verra Mobility Corporation
|
Comtech Telecommunications Corp
|
NCR Corporation
|
Viasat, Inc.
|
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
|
OSI Systems, Inc.
|
Woodward, Inc.
|
55
Our current peer group consists of 18 companies, a robust sample of organizations relevant to Cubic’s core business lines (Performance and Mission Solutions, and Transportation Systems).
The peer group is designed to be used for ongoing executive and director pay benchmarking and pay-performance evaluations.
Modifications to the peer group in 2019 and 2020 refined the group’s fit within industry, size, and labor market perspectives from which to draw such comparisons
The peer group changes from fiscal year 2019 included removing Crane co., Esterline Technologies Corporation, Maxar Technologies Inc., and VeriFone Systems, Inc., due to acquisitions; and adding Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., Barnes Group Inc., CAE Inc., NCR Corporation, Verra Mobility Corporation, and Woodward, Inc. based on industry, size and business model.
56
SECTION 3: FISCAL YEAR 2020 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION DECISIONS
Named Executive Officer Leadership Changes
In fiscal year 2020, the Company made the following leadership changes impacting our NEOs:
Jeffrey Lowinger — Appointed Senior Vice President of Cubic and President of Cubic Transportation Systems on April 27, 2020.
Michael Twyman — Departed on August 27, 2020, after serving as Senior Vice President of Cubic and President of Cubic Mission Solutions since May 25, 2016 due to the combination of the two defense businesses.
Michael Knowles — Named Senior Vice President of Cubic and President of Cubic Mission and Performance Solutions on August 29, 2020 after the combination of the two defense businesses.
The table below summarizes the fiscal year 2020 compensation decisions for our NEOs. Details about the 2020 compensation decisions are more fully discussed below in Section 3.
Pay Element
|
CEO (Mr. Feldmann)
|
Other NEOs
|
Additional Comments
|
Base Salary
|
• Base salary was increased to $975,000 (up 3.7%)
|
• Merit increases averaged 6.4% for Aga and Lee; Knowles received a market adjustment and Lowinger was newly hired in fiscal year 2020
|
• Adjustment to base salaries based on comparable company data and evaluation of individual performance by Executive Compensation Committee
|
Annual Incentive
|
• Target: 110% of base salary
|
• Target: A range between 60% and 80% of base salary
|
• Mr. Feldman’s target increased to 110% of base salary to align with comparable companies, all other targets were unchanged from prior year.
|
|
• Paid at 59% of target (20.6% of target based on results and 38.4% of target for discretionary award)
|
• Paid at range of 59% — 70% of individual targets (based on results and discretionary awards)
|
• Actual payout is based on achievements of financial and strategic targets
|
Long-Term Incentive — PRSUs Annual Grant
|
• Represented 50% of 2020 annual LTI awards (at “target”)
|
• Represented 50% of 2020 annual LTI awards for other NEOs (at target) in position at the time of the annual LTI awards in November 2019
|
• Vests based on annual Company Sales growth and annual Adjusted EBITDA growth and relative TSR for performance period as described below under “Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards”
|
Long-Term Incentive — RSUs Annual Grant
|
• Represented 50% of 2020 annual LTI awards
|
• Represented 50% of 2020 annual LTI awards for other NEOs in position at the time of the annual LTI awards in November 2019
|
• Vests over 3 years
|
57
BASE SALARY
Base salaries for our executives are established based on individual factors such as the scope of their responsibilities, background, track record, training and experience, as well as competitive comparable company data and an evaluation of their performance.
In November 2019, the Executive Compensation Committee, upon establishing the total target compensation for the NEOs (other than Mr. Lowinger) for 2020 consistent with our overall compensation philosophy, established the following 2020 base salaries for the NEOs:
Named Executive Officers
|
2020 Base Salary
|
Year- over- Year
|
Mr. Feldmann
|
$975,000
|
+3.7%
|
Mr. Aga
|
$513,040
|
+6.0%
|
Mr. Knowles
|
$420,000
|
+20.0%
|
Ms. Lee
|
$401,250
|
+7.0%
|
Mr. Lowinger
|
$550,000
|
N/A
|
Mr. Twyman
|
$551,785
|
+7.0%
|
The adjustments to the NEOs’ base salaries for fiscal year 2020 were made at the beginning of fiscal year 2020 based on the Executive Compensation Committee’s review of comparable company data, as described above, and their assessment of each individual’s performance. This excludes Mr. Lowinger who was hired on April 27, 2020.
The fiscal year 2020 base salaries for each of the NEOs are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table in the Executive Compensation Tables section below.
ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN
Our annual incentive awards emphasize pay-for-performance by providing our executives with the opportunity to receive performance awards based on annual corporate and business segment objectives and individual performance.
At the beginning of the fiscal year, the Executive Compensation Committee sets each listed NEO’s annual incentive target amount as part of the annual performance review and compensation adjustment cycle.
Individual target percentages for the last two years were:
|
2019 Target
Annual
Incentive Award
|
2020 Target
Annual
Incentive Award
|
Mr. Feldmann
|
100%
|
110%
|
Mr. Aga
|
80%
|
80%
|
Other NEOs
|
60% – 70%
|
60% – 70%
|
Mr. Feldman’s 2020 target incentive award was increased by the Executive Compensation Committee following their review of peer competitive practices and an assessment of the importance of the Chief Executive Officer role. Individual target annual incentive awards for the NEOs were determined by multiplying their 2020 fiscal year base salary by their individual target award percentage.
58
Target Performance Levels and Metrics
NEO annual incentives are determined through a three-step performance measurement process:
1.
|
Established target performance measures, company-wide and, as applicable, for each business segment as described below
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Relative achievement of performance measures: Weighted Metrics (0% – 200% payout)
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Individual NEO performance — Individual Multiplier Applied to Attained Results (0% – 120% payout)
|
|
The various performance objectives under the annual incentive plan are weighted depending on the Executive Compensation Committee’s belief regarding the suitability of emphasis of each factor for that year’s performance.
The following table describes each of the corporate and segment performance metrics (90% weighting to specific financial metrics) and the relative weighting percentage for each metric.
Metrics
|
Rationale
|
Weighting
CEO, CFO &
CHRDO
|
Weighting
other NEOs
|
Total Cubic Sales
|
Aligns with our objective to deliver top-line growth
|
10%
|
—
|
Total Cubic Adjusted EBITDA
|
Key measure of profitability and operating performance; target is set to drive improved profitability
|
60%
|
60%
|
Total Cubic Operating Cash Flow (excluding VIE)
|
Drives reduced leverage and capital efficiency
|
20%
|
—
|
Segment Cash Flows
|
Aligns with company-wide objectives and the individual’s specific area of responsibility
|
—
|
10%
|
Segment Adjusted EBITDA
|
Aligns with company-wide objectives and the individual’s specific area of responsibility
|
—
|
20%
|
Digital Strategy
|
Aligns with our strategic objective to enhance long-term value for our customers and shareholders
|
10%
|
10%
|
Target levels for the various performance objectives are set to require challenging but attainable goals depending on current market conditions and our business prospects. The following table describes the minimum and maximum achievement levels attributable to the 2020 performance measures.
59
|
|
Min
|
Max
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
% of Target
|
93%
|
110%
|
|
% of Award
|
0%
|
200%
|
Each 1% achievement above target, payout amount increases by 10%
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
% of Target
|
93%
|
110%
|
|
% of Award
|
0%
|
200%
|
Each 1% achievement above target, payout amount increases by 10%
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows
|
% of Target
|
80%
|
120%
|
|
% of Award
|
0%
|
200%
|
Each 1% achievement above target, payout amount increases by 5%
|
|
|
|
Digital Strategy
|
% of Target
|
80%
|
100%
|
|
% of Award
|
0%
|
100%
|
Digital Strategy is a subjective measure and is capped at 100% achievement
|
|
|
|
The table below sets forth the performance objectives and weighting for each of the NEOs, our actual performance relative to those objectives during fiscal year 2020 and the formulaic weighted percentage achievement for the annual incentive awards. The overall formulaic weighted percentage achievement relative to all the corporate and segment performance measures for fiscal year 2020, prior to the application of the Executive Compensation Committee’s discretion as described below:
Performance measures
(in thousands)
|
|
2020
Weighting
%
|
|
2020
Target
|
|
2020
Actual
|
|
% of
Target
Achieved
|
|
% of
Payout
Earned
|
Cubic Corporation: Performance measures for Mr. Feldmann, Mr. Aga and Ms. Lee
|
|
Sales
|
|
10%
|
|
$1,629,752
|
|
$1,476,235
|
|
90.58%
|
|
0.00%
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
|
|
60%
|
|
$182,317
|
|
$158,294
|
|
86.82%
|
|
0.00%
|
|
Cash Flows(2)
|
|
20%
|
|
$128,471
|
|
$104,206
|
|
81.11%
|
|
10.56%
|
|
Digital Strategy
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.00%
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
20.56
|
%
|
Cubic Transportation Systems: Performance measures Mr. Lowinger
|
|
Segment Adjusted EBITDA(1)
|
|
20%
|
|
$128,949
|
|
$133,972
|
|
103.90%
|
|
27.97%
|
|
Segment Cash Flows(2)
|
|
10%
|
|
$100,890
|
|
$50,081
|
|
49.64%
|
|
0.00%
|
|
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA(1)
|
|
60%
|
|
$182,317
|
|
$158,294
|
|
86.82%
|
|
0.00%
|
|
Digital Strategy
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.00%
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
37.97
|
%
|
Cubic Mission Solutions: Performance measures for Mr. Twyman
|
|
Segment Adjusted EBITDA(1)
|
|
20%
|
|
$62,000
|
|
$28,169
|
|
45.43%
|
|
0.00%
|
|
Segment Cash Flows(3)
|
|
10%
|
|
$42,900
|
|
$25,250
|
|
58.86%
|
|
0.00%
|
|
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA(1)
|
|
60%
|
|
$182,317
|
|
$158,294
|
|
86.82%
|
|
0.00%
|
|
Digital Strategy
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.00%
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
60
Performance measures
(in thousands)
|
|
2020
Weighting
%
|
|
2020
Target
|
|
2020
Actual
|
|
% of
Target
Achieved
|
|
% of
Payout
Earned
|
Cubic Global Defense: Performance measures for Mr. Knowles
|
|
Segment Adjusted EBITDA(1)
|
|
20%
|
|
$
|
31,369
|
|
$
|
32,945
|
|
105.02%
|
|
30.05%
|
|
Segment Cash Flows(3)
|
|
10%
|
|
$
|
39,681
|
|
$
|
104,939
|
|
264.46%
|
|
20.00%
|
|
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA(1)
|
|
60%
|
|
$
|
182,317
|
|
$
|
158,294
|
|
86.82%
|
|
0.00%
|
|
Digital Strategy
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.00%
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
60.05
|
%
|
The following is a reconciliation of Consolidated and Segment Adjusted EBITDA:
|
|
Year Ended September 30, 2020
(in millions)
|
|
Cubic
Consolidated
|
|
Segments
|
Cubic Transportation
Systems (CTS)
|
|
Cubic Mission
Solutions (CMS)
|
|
Cubic Global
Defense (CGD)
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Cubic
|
|
$
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest in loss of VIE
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(6.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-operating expense, net
|
|
|
28.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
61.6
|
|
|
$
|
121.0
|
|
|
$
|
(26.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
22.9
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
88.5
|
|
|
|
29.5
|
|
|
|
47.8
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
Noncontrolling interest in EBITDA of VIE
|
|
|
(25.1
|
)
|
|
|
(25.1
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Acquisition related expenses, excluding amortization
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Strategic and IT system resource planning expenses
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gain on sale of fixed assets
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
16.6
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
158.3
|
|
|
$
|
134.0
|
|
|
$
|
28.2
|
|
|
$
|
32.9
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
CTS
|
Net cash used in operating activities from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(8,291
|
)
|
|
$
|
(62,416
|
)
|
Operating cash flows associated with OpCo VIE
|
|
|
112,497
|
|
|
|
112,497
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities, excluding the impact of the OpCo VIE
|
|
$
|
104,206
|
|
|
$
|
50,081
|
|
61
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
CMS
|
|
CGD
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(26,750)
|
|
|
$
|
22,945
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
47,797
|
|
|
|
7,196
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
4,314
|
|
|
|
3,184
|
|
Gain on sale of fixed assets
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
|
25,361
|
|
|
|
33,155
|
|
Working Capital Changes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
2,470
|
|
|
|
74,178
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(2,581
|
)
|
|
|
(2,394
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
25,250
|
|
|
$
|
104,939
|
|
Payments of Fiscal Year 2020 Approved Annual Incentives and Application of Resilience-based Discretion
After applying the formulaic payout percentages described above, and deciding individual performance multipliers for each NEO, the Executive Compensation Committee approved 2020 annual incentive payments. Individual modifiers are scored based on business results, performance against objectives, operational excellence, talent development and employee engagement. Based on the determination of the participant’s individual performance, a multiplier is applied to the participant’s incentive amount as determined based on achievement relative to the corporate and/or business unit performance goals. The multiplier for individual performance is within the range of 0% to 120%.
Cubic delivered strong financial results in fiscal year 2020, despite the global pandemic. The leadership team swiftly adapted to the new way of working, providing employees the ability to work remotely and remain productive. The policies enacted were instrumental in ensuring that the Company could continue delivering essential services and meet its customer commitments and offset certain financial impacts related to delays in new awards, lower transit ridership, a slowdown of training exercises in defense and other headwinds. Cost containment measures were quickly put into place including pay reductions for the CEO, CFO and the Board, hiring freeze, reduction in force, temporary suspension of retirement benefits, including 401(k) match and discretionary contributions, re-negotiations of supply chain arrangements and the reduction or deferral of other expenses.
As detailed in the Executive Summary on page 42, the Executive Compensation Committee decided to use positive discretion as detailed below in determining the annual payout for fiscal year 2020 to recognize the exceptional work of the leadership team and employees to successfully address our key priorities relating to the Company’s COVID-19 response plan and to ensure the long-term sustainability of Cubic. The resilience based discretionary factor set forth in the table below for each NEO was determined by subtracting the formula based achievement percentage from the funding cap applicable to the NEO (60% of target on average for the NEOs). This positive discretion was also applied to other employees who are participants in the annual incentive plan. We estimate that the COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted Sales by up to $73 million and Adjusted EBITDA by up to $28 million during fiscal year 2020. While the estimated impacts of COVID-19 may not have been overly material to Cubic’s operations, relative to the ambitious manner in which Cubic established its incentive plan goals for fiscal year 2020, we believe these reductions had a significant negative impact on award calculations.
NEO
|
Base
Salary
|
x
|
Individual
Target
Percentage
|
=
|
Target
Award
|
x
|
Formula
Based
Achievement
|
+
|
Resilience
Based
Discretion
|
x
|
Individual
Performance
Multiplier
|
=
|
Annual
Incentive
Cash Award Earned(1)
|
Mr. Feldmann
|
$975,000
|
|
110%
|
|
$1,072,500
|
|
20.6%
|
|
38.4%
|
|
1.1
|
|
$696,053
|
Mr. Aga
|
$513,040
|
|
80%
|
|
$410,432
|
|
20.6%
|
|
38.4%
|
|
1.05
|
|
$254,263
|
Mr. Knowles
|
$420,000
|
|
70%
|
|
$294,000
|
|
60.2%
|
|
9.8%
|
|
1.05
|
|
$216,090
|
Ms. Lee
|
$401,250
|
|
60%
|
|
$240,750
|
|
20.6%
|
|
38.4%
|
|
1.05
|
|
$149,145
|
Mr. Lowinger
|
$550,000
|
|
70%
|
|
$385,000
|
|
38.0%
|
|
27.0%
|
|
1.1
|
|
$275,275
|
62
LONG-TERM EQUITY INCENTIVE AWARDS
We award both RSUs and PRSUs pursuant to our long-term equity incentive award program. All of the awards are made under our 2015 Incentive Award Plan. Each RSU represents a contingent right to receive one share of our common stock. Vested shares will be delivered to the recipient following each vesting date. Dividend equivalent rights accrue with respect to the RSUs when and as dividends are paid on our common stock and vest proportionately with the RSUs to which they relate.
The use of PRSUs as a component of the overall equity awards granted is based upon the Executive Compensation Committee’s consideration of competitive market data, the desirability of utilizing a balanced system to mitigate risk, the desire to encourage superior performance while building ownership, and the desirability of this type of equity award as a component of a pay-for-performance program.
Fiscal Year 2020 Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards
In November 2019, the Executive Compensation Committee awarded the RSUs and PRSUs to the NEOs listed below, other than Mr. Lowinger. Mr. Lowinger was granted the time-based RSUs listed below upon the date of his employment with Cubic on April 27, 2020.
|
Time-Based
Vesting RSUs
(#)
|
Target Number of
PRSUs
(#)
|
Mr. Feldmann
|
37,784
|
37,784
|
Mr. Aga
|
10,076
|
10,076
|
Mr. Knowles
|
6,718
|
6,718
|
Ms. Lee
|
5,878
|
5,878
|
Mr. Lowinger(1)
|
22,683
|
—
|
Mr. Twyman(2)
|
6,718
|
6,718
|
The RSUs vest in three equal installments on each of October 1, 2020, 2021 and 2022, subject to the recipient’s continued service with the Company through each such vesting date, except as otherwise provided in the applicable RSU agreement.
The PRSUs granted to our NEOs are intended to reward the achievement of the following objectives over a three-year period:
Metric
|
Rationale
|
Weighting
|
Cumulative Sales growth over performance period
|
• Key to our long-term success and reflects our focus on performance metrics that drive growth and shareholder value
|
50%
|
Cumulative Adjusted EBITDA growth over performance period
|
• Drives performance towards achieving profitable growth and our strategic objectives related to building a technology-driven, market-leading company; target is set to exceed Sales growth to drive improved profitability
|
50%
|
Relative TSR multiplier
|
• To further link the long-term interests of management and shareholders
|
|
The three-year performance period for the PRSUs granted on November 29, 2019 commenced on October 1, 2019 and will end on September 30, 2022. These performance-based RSUs are referred to as the “2020-2022 PRSUs”.
The 2020-2022 PRSUs vest at the end of a three-year performance period based 50% on Cubic’s Sales growth and 50% on Cubic’s Adjusted EBITDA growth for the performance period, subject to the recipient’s continued service through the end of the three-year performance period, except as otherwise provided in the applicable PRSU agreement.
63
If the Company’s Sales growth achievement and/or Adjusted EBITDA growth achievement for the performance period equals or exceeds one of three different achievement levels (threshold, target and maximum), then an achievement percentage for the performance period will be determined (50%, 100% and 200%, respectively). Performance below the threshold level for a performance measure will result in a 0% achievement percentage for the applicable fiscal year for that measure.
Following the completion of the three-year performance period, the Executive Compensation Committee will determine the achievement percentage relative to Sales growth and Adjusted EBITDA growth for the performance period and determine the final average achievement percentage for the performance period for each factor.
Cubic’s Sales growth for purposes of the 2020-2022 PRSUs generally means the aggregate of the Company’s Sales during the performance period, divided by a baseline Sales level determined by the Executive Compensation Committee. Cubic’s Adjusted EBITDA growth for purposes of the 2020-2022 PRSUs generally means the aggregate of the Company’s Adjusted EBITDA during the performance period, divided by a baseline Adjusted EBITDA level determined by the Executive Compensation Committee. For purposes of the 2020-2022 PRSUs, Sales and Adjusted EBITDA will be calculated in a manner to exclude the effect of changes in foreign exchange rates and will also be calculated in a manner to exclude the effect of acquisitions or divestitures, unless otherwise specifically determined by the Executive Compensation Committee. In September 2020, the Executive Compensation Committee modified the Sales and Adjusted EBITDA growth targets to include the fiscal year 2020 acquisitions of Pixia and Delerrok in the baseline amounts, and the actual Sales growth and Adjusted EBITDA growth achievement will include the Sales and Adjusted EBITDA of Pixia and Delerrok over the performance period. Since the acquisitions of Pixia and Delerrok were completed soon after the inception of the three-year performance of the 2020-2022 PRSUs, the Executive Compensation Committee determined that the inclusion of these acquired entities in the performance targets would better represent the Company’s total performance over the performance period and would better hold management accountable for the overall results of the Company, including these acquired businesses, in order to drive shareholder value.
For these 2020-2022 PRSUs, Cubic’s relative TSR as compared to the Russell 2000 Index over the performance period will result in a multiplier for the number of PRSUs that will vest, after the final Sales growth and Adjusted EBITDA growth achievement percentages have been determined for the performance period. If Cubic’s relative TSR performance exceeds the performance of the Russell 2000 Index based on a scale established by the Executive Compensation Committee, the multiplier will result in up to an additional 25% of the PRSUs vesting at the end of the performance period. If Cubic’s TSR performance is below the performance of the Russell 2000 Index based on a scale established by the Executive Compensation Committee, the multiplier could result in a reduction of up to 25% of these PRSUs vesting at the end of the performance period. The relative TSR performance multiplier is described in the table below:
Relative TSR Performance
|
TSR Multiplier
|
Cubic TSR is 2500 basis points or more above the Russell 2000 Index TSR
|
125%
|
Cubic TSR is 1000 basis points above the Russell 2000 Index TSR
|
110%
|
Cubic TSR is 1000 basis points below the Russell 2000 Index TSR
|
90%
|
Cubic TSR is 2500 basis points or more below the Russell 2000 Index TSR
|
75%
|
If Cubic’s absolute TSR is negative for the performance period, in no event will the relative TSR multiplier exceed 100%, regardless of performance relative to the Russell 2000 Index. In addition, in no event will the number of 2020-2022 PRSUs that vest at the end of the three-year performance period exceed 200% of the target PRSUs. The percentage for determining the number of PRSUs that will vest if performance is between specified achievement levels will be determined by linear interpolation.
64
PRSUs for Performance Period Ended September 30, 2020
The PRSUs granted on November 12, 2017 (referred to as the “2018-2020 PRSUs”) were intended to reward the achievement of the following objectives over a three-year performance period, which commenced on October 1, 2017 and ended on September 30, 2020. These RSUs were eligible to vest based on:
• Sales growth (40% weighting)
• Adjusted EBITDA growth, (40% weighting)
• ROE (20% weighting)
If the Company’s achievement of these objectives for the performance period equaled or exceeded one of three different achievement levels (threshold, target and maximum), then a certain percentage of the RSUs were eligible to vest (25%, 100% and 200%, respectively).
The percentage for determining the number of RSUs that would vest if performance was between the specified achievement levels was determined by linear interpolation between the applicable achievement amounts for each measure. Performance below the threshold level for a performance measure would result in no vesting with respect to that measure.
As described in the table below, based on the level of such Sales growth, Adjusted EBITDA growth, and ROE, for the three-year performance period, the Executive Compensation Committee determined that 160% of the 2018-2020 PRSUs would vest.
The Company’s performance as compared with the targets, which resulted in a 160% vesting with respect to the 2018-2020 PRSUs, is as follows:
Performance measures
|
|
2018-2020
PRSU
Weighting %
|
|
2018-2020
PRSU
Threshold
|
|
2018-2020
PRSU
Target
|
|
2018-2020
PRSU
Maximum
|
|
2018-2020
Actual
Achievement
|
|
% of Vesting
Achieved
|
|
Weighted
Vesting
Earned
|
Cubic Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Growth Factor(1)
|
|
40%
|
|
1.05
|
|
1.10
|
|
1.15
|
|
1.19
|
|
200.0%
|
|
80.0%
|
Adjusted EBITDA Growth Factor(2)
|
|
40%
|
|
1.06
|
|
1.11
|
|
1.17
|
|
1.38
|
|
200.0%
|
|
80.0%
|
Return on Equity(3)
|
|
20%
|
|
5.5%
|
|
8.0%
|
|
10.5%
|
|
2.4%
|
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
160.0%
|
65
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Year Ended September 30,
|
|
Three
Years Ended
September 30,
2020
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2020
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Cubic
|
|
$
|
12,310
|
|
|
$
|
49,694
|
|
|
$
|
(3,221
|
)
|
|
$
|
58,783
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
(4,243
|
)
|
|
|
1,423
|
|
|
|
(436
|
)
|
|
|
(3,256
|
)
|
Noncontrolling interest in the income (loss) of the VIE
|
|
|
(274
|
)
|
|
|
(9,811
|
)
|
|
|
6,592
|
|
|
|
(3,493
|
)
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
8,809
|
|
|
|
13,934
|
|
|
|
20,163
|
|
|
|
42,906
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
16,090
|
|
|
|
16,090
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
7,093
|
|
|
|
11,040
|
|
|
|
(6,380
|
)
|
|
|
11,753
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
46,600
|
|
|
|
64,742
|
|
|
|
88,482
|
|
|
|
199,824
|
|
Noncontrolling interest in EBITDA of VIE
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(8,940
|
)
|
|
|
(25,122
|
)
|
|
|
(34,062
|
)
|
Acquisition related expenses, excluding amortization
|
|
|
4,420
|
|
|
|
13,437
|
|
|
|
13,026
|
|
|
|
30,883
|
|
Strategic and IT system resources planning expense
|
|
|
24,141
|
|
|
|
8,242
|
|
|
|
3,904
|
|
|
|
36,287
|
|
Gain on sale of fixed assets
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(32,510
|
)
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
(32,680
|
)
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
5,018
|
|
|
|
15,386
|
|
|
|
16,599
|
|
|
|
37,003
|
|
Other non-operating expense, net
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
|
19,957
|
|
|
|
28,767
|
|
|
|
49,411
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
104,561
|
|
|
$
|
146,594
|
|
|
$
|
158,294
|
|
|
$
|
409,449
|
|
Impact of ASC 606
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(5,955
|
)
|
|
|
(6,430
|
)
|
|
|
(12,385
|
)
|
Adjusted EBITDA, excluding the impact of ASC 606
|
|
$
|
104,561
|
|
|
$
|
140,639
|
|
|
$
|
151,864
|
|
|
$
|
397,064
|
|
66
PRSUs for Performance Period Ending September 30, 2021
The three-year performance period for the PRSUs granted on November 21, 2018 commenced on October 1, 2018 and will end on September 30, 2021. These performance-based RSUs are referred to as the “2019-2021 PRSUs.”
The 2019-2021 PRSUs vest at the end of a three-year performance period based 50% on Cubic’s annual Sales growth and 50% on Cubic’s annual Adjusted EBITDA growth for each of the three fiscal years within the performance period, subject to the recipient’s continued service through the end of the three-year performance period, except as otherwise provided in the applicable PRSU agreement.
If the Company’s annual Sales growth achievement and/or annual Adjusted EBITDA growth achievement for each fiscal year during the performance period equals or exceeds one of three different achievement levels (threshold, target and maximum), then an annual achievement percentage for such fiscal year will be determined (50%, 100% and 200%, respectively), as reflected in the tables below:
Annual Sales Growth
|
Annual Sales
Growth
Achievement
Percentage
|
Less than 2.5%
|
0%
|
2.5%
|
50%
|
5.0%
|
100%
|
7.5% or Greater
|
200%
|
Annual Adjusted
EBITDA Growth
|
Annual Adjusted
EBITDA Growth
Achievement
Percentage
|
Less than 2.75%
|
0%
|
2.75%
|
50%
|
5.5%
|
100%
|
8.25% or Greater
|
200%
|
Performance below the threshold level for a performance measure will result in a 0% achievement percentage for the applicable fiscal year for that measure.
Following the completion of the three-year performance period, the Executive Compensation Committee will determine the annual achievement percentage relative to Sales growth and Adjusted EBITDA growth for each of the three fiscal years in the performance period and determine the final average achievement percentage for the performance period for each factor.
Cubic’s annual Sales growth for each fiscal year during the performance period will be determined by dividing Cubic’s Sales during the applicable fiscal year, divided by Cubic’s Sales for the preceding fiscal year, expressed as a percentage. Cubic’s annual Adjusted EBITDA growth for each fiscal year during the performance period will be determined by dividing Cubic’s Adjusted EBITDA during the applicable fiscal year, divided by Cubic’s Adjusted EBITDA for the preceding fiscal year, expressed as a percentage.
For these 2019-2021 PRSUs, Cubic’s relative TSR as compared to the Russell 2000 Index over the performance period will result in a multiplier for the number of PRSUs that will vest, after the final annual Sales and Adjusted EBITDA achievement percentages have been determined for the performance period.
67
If Cubic’s relative TSR performance exceeds the performance of the Russell 2000 Index based on a scale established by the Executive Compensation Committee, the multiplier will result in up to an additional 25% of the PRSUs vesting at the end of the performance period. If Cubic’s TSR performance is below the performance of the Russell 2000 Index based on a scale established by the Executive Compensation Committee, the multiplier could result in a reduction of up to 25% of these PRSUs vesting at the end of the performance period. The relative TSR performance multiplier is described in the table below:
Relative TSR Performance
|
TSR Multiplier
|
Cubic TSR is 2500 basis points or more above the Russell 2000 Index TSR
|
125%
|
Cubic TSR is 1000 basis points above the Russell 2000 Index TSR
|
110%
|
Cubic TSR is 1000 basis points below the Russell 2000 Index TSR
|
90%
|
Cubic TSR is 2500 basis points or more below the Russell 2000 Index TSR
|
75%
|
In no event will the number of 2019-2021 PRSUs that vest at the end of the three-year performance period exceed 250% of the target PRSUs.
The percentage for determining the number of PRSUs that will vest if performance is between specified achievement levels will be determined by linear interpolation.
As described in the table below, based on the level of Sales growth and Adjusted EBITDA growth for fiscal years 2019 and 2020, the achievement levels for fiscal years 2019 and 2020 relative to these objectives that will be used in determining the final average achievement percentage at the end of the three-year performance period are set forth below:
Performance Measures
|
2019-2021
PRSU
Weighting Percentage
|
2019
Growth
Achieved
|
Annual
Achievement
Percentage
for 2019
|
2020
Growth Achieved
|
Annual
Achievement
Percentage
for 2020
|
Cubic Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Growth Factor(1)
|
50%
|
15.3%
|
200%
|
(1.4%)
|
0.0%
|
Adjusted EBITDA Growth Factor(2)
|
50%
|
34.5%
|
200%
|
8.0%
|
190.2%
|
Accelerated Vesting of RSUs
RSUs are generally forfeited unless an executive is continuously employed through the applicable vesting dates. There are, however, certain exceptions to this treatment.
RSUs Granted Prior to Fiscal Year 2020. For purposes of RSUs granted prior to fiscal year 2020, the RSUs granted by us vest immediately upon a recipient’s termination of employment or service as a result of his or her death or disability. In addition, the RSUs vest immediately upon a recipient’s termination without cause or resignation for good reason within 12 months following a change in control.
68
RSUs Granted Beginning in Fiscal Year 2020. Commencing with the RSUs granted in fiscal year 2020, the accelerated vesting provisions applicable to the RSUs were revised. The RSUs granted commencing in fiscal year 2020 vest immediately upon a recipient’s termination of employment or service as a result of his or her death or disability. In addition, the RSUs granted to our executive officers vest immediately upon a recipient’s termination without cause or resignation for good reason in either case within 3 months prior to or 18 months following a change in control or during the required 12-month retirement notice period. Finally, the RSUs granted to our executive officers will vest upon retirement.
For purposes of the equity awards granted commencing in fiscal year 2020, retirement means an executive’s resignation following the attainment of age 60 and 10 years of service, and the satisfaction of a 12-month notice period.
Accelerated Vesting of PRSUs
PRSUs are generally forfeited unless an executive is continuously employed through the last day of the performance period. The underlying principle is that the executive needs to have been an active employee during the entire performance period in order to have contributed to the results on which the earned awards are based. There are, however, certain exceptions to this treatment.
PRSUs Granted Prior to Fiscal Year 2019. With respect to PRSUs granted prior to fiscal year 2019, upon a change in control of the Company, a number of PRSUs equal to the target RSUs will vest immediately prior to the date of such change in control. In the event of a recipient’s termination of employment or service as a result of his or her disability, termination without cause or resignation for good reason, the recipient will remain eligible to vest in the PRSUs based on actual performance for the three-year performance period, with the resulting PRSUs prorated for the portion of the performance period that elapsed prior to the date of such termination.
In the event of a recipient’s death, the recipient will vest in the target PRSUs, which target PRSUs shall be prorated for the portion of the performance period that elapsed prior to the date of death.
PRSUs Granted in Fiscal Year 2019. For purposes of the PRSUs granted in fiscal year 2019, upon a change in control of the Company, a number of PRSUs equal to the target PRSUs, or, if greater, the application of the relative TSR multiplier to the target PRSUs calculated for the performance period through the date of the change in control, will vest on the date of the change in control.
In the event of a recipient’s termination of employment or service as a result of his or her disability, termination without cause or resignation for good reason, the recipient will remain eligible to vest in the PRSUs based on actual performance for the performance period, with the resulting PRSUs prorated for the portion of the performance period that elapsed prior to the date of such termination.
In the event of a recipient’s death prior to a change in control, the recipient will vest in the target PRSUs.
PRSUs Granted Beginning in Fiscal Year 2020. Commencing with the PRSUs granted in fiscal year 2020, the accelerated vesting provisions applicable to the PRSUs were further revised.
Upon a change in control of the Company, the number of PRSUs a participant will remain eligible to vest in following the change in control will be equal to the target PRSUs, or, if greater, the application of the relative TSR multiplier to the target PRSUs calculated for the performance period through the date of the change in control (the “vesting eligible PRSUs”). The vesting eligible PRSUs will then vest on the last day of the three-year performance period, subject to an employee’s continued employment through such date.
If, following a change in control, a recipient’s employment or service is terminated as a result of his or her death, disability or retirement, the vesting eligible PRSUs will vest upon such termination. In addition, if an executive’s employment or service is terminated as a result of his or her termination without cause or resignation for good reason within 3 months prior or 18 months following a change in control, or during his or her required 12-month notice period, all of the vesting eligible PRSUs will vest upon such termination.
In the event a recipient’s employment or service is terminated as a result of his or her termination without cause or resignation for good reason or disability prior to a change in control, the recipient will remain eligible to vest in the PRSUs based on actual performance for the performance period (or in the vesting eligible shares if a change in control occurs prior to the end of the performance period), with the resulting PRSUs prorated for the portion of the performance period
69
that elapsed prior to the date of such termination (unless such termination without cause or resignation for good reason occurs within 3 months prior to a change in control or such termination or disability occurs during the required retirement notice period, in which case no proration will apply).
In the event of a recipient’s retirement prior to a change in control, the recipient will remain eligible to vest in the PRSUs based on actual performance for the performance period (or in the vesting eligible shares if a change in control occurs prior to the end of the performance period).
In the event of a recipient’s death prior to a change in control, the recipient will vest in the target PRSUs.
SECTION 4: OTHER COMPENSATION MATTERS AND BENEFIT PROGRAMS
Stock Ownership Requirements
In keeping with corporate governance best practices, management and directors align their stock ownership interests with those of our shareholders. Beginning in fiscal year 2020, enhancements to stock ownership guidelines were established for our senior management and non-employee directors. These new guidelines are expected to be achieved within five years of implementation date. All company shares held by the director or officer, his or her related trusts and immediate family, unvested RSUs but not PRSUs shall be included in the calculations.
All NEOs and directors who have been executive officers or directors of the Company for at least five years are in compliance with the ownership guidelines. All NEOs and directors who joined the Company or became executive officers within the last five years are progressing toward compliance with the ownership guidelines by the required compliance date.
(multiples of base salary or base retainer)
|
2019
|
2020
|
CEO
|
3x
|
5x
|
Directors
|
2x
|
5x
|
CFO
|
1x
|
3x
|
Other NEOs
|
1x
|
2x
|
VPs
|
0.5x
|
0.5x
|
COMPENSATION RECOVERY POLICY
Management and our Board believe our compensation policies are not reasonably likely to result in a material adverse financial or other effect. Also, we believe our compensation policies and practices have not and will not impact our risk management objectives and do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
However, our Board is committed to following good corporate governance practices and believes it is prudent to maintain a compensation recovery, or “claw-back,” policy. This claw-back policy is in addition to any policies or recovery rights that are provided under applicable laws, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Dodd-Frank Act.
Pursuant to the terms of the “claw-back” policy, our Board has the right to require reimbursement or forfeiture of incentive compensation from an executive officer in the event the officer’s wrongdoing is later determined by the Board to have resulted in (1) a restatement of the Company’s financial results due to its material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under U.S. securities law; or (2) a material negative revision of a financial or operating measure on the basis of which incentive compensation was awarded (a “Recoverable Event”).
70
Under our claw-back policy, if the Board determines that a Recoverable Event was caused by an executive officer’s fraud, gross negligence or willful misconduct, it may require reimbursement from the executive officer for vested incentive compensation and/or the forfeiture of unvested or unpaid incentive compensation. The amount of incentive compensation that may be recovered or subject to forfeiture is any incentive compensation awarded, vested or paid to the executive officer that the executive officer would not have been awarded, vested or paid if the Company’s financial results had been reported properly. The right to cause a forfeiture or recovery of incentive compensation applies to incentive compensation awarded, vested and/or paid during the twelve months prior to the date on which we are required to prepare an accounting restatement and would be determined on an after-tax basis for any incentive compensation to be recovered from the executive officer.
ANTI-HEDGING POLICY APPLICABLE TO NEOS
Pursuant to Cubic’s insider trading policy, all NEOs are prohibited from purchasing financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, and exchange funds) that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of equity securities which: (1) have been granted to the NEO by the Company as part of their compensation, or (2) are held directly or indirectly by the NEO. Our hedging policy is described further above under “Hedging Policy.”
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
Certain of the directors and NEOs participate in the Cubic Corporation Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”). For more information, please see the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table below.
Benefit Programs
RETIREMENT BENEFITS
All of our regular employees, including our NEOs, who meet certain defined requirements, may participate in our 401(k) plan. 401(k) matching payments and discretionary contribution are equally available to all eligible employees. The discretionary contribution percentage is based on a scale ranging from 2.5% to 9% of eligible compensation and is tied to the Company’s ROE for the fiscal year.
As part of our cost containment measures as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, management recommended to suspend the 401(k) match from May through September 2020 and the discretionary contribution for fiscal year 2020. Therefore, there is no discretionary contribution this year. The 401(k) match and discretionary contribution have been reinstated for fiscal year 2021.
Mr. Feldmann is also a participant in the Cubic Corporation Pension Plan (the “Pension Plan”), which plan was frozen as of December 31, 2006.
OTHER BENEFITS
We provide certain perquisites and personal benefits to our senior executives. NEOs receive the following benefits: annual physical examinations, term life insurance, a financial planning and wellness benefit of up to $15,000 per year. The CEO is also provided with an automobile allowance.
During fiscal year 2019, we also provided each NEO a limited amount of administrative support for personal travel arrangements and other personal business at the Company’s expense.
Our Executive Compensation Committee periodically reviews the levels of perquisites and other personal benefits to the NEOs to ensure they fit within the Company’s overall compensation philosophy.
71
SEVERANCE AND CHANGE IN CONTROL BENEFITS
The Board has approved severance and change in control arrangements in which our NEOs participate to provide for certain severance benefits in the event that a NEO’s employment is involuntarily or terminated under certain circumstances unrelated to a change in control or involuntarily terminated without cause or constructively terminated, in connection with a change in control. The Company recognizes the challenges executives often face securing new employment following termination.
To mitigate these challenges and to secure the focus of our management team on the Company’s affairs, all NEOs are entitled to receive severance payments under the Company’s severance policy upon a termination by the Company under certain circumstances, such as a reduction in force, job elimination or reorganization. The Company believes that reasonable severance benefits for its executive officers are important because it may be difficult for its executive officers to find comparable employment within a short period of time following certain qualifying terminations.
In lieu of normal severance, we provide enhanced benefits in the event of an involuntary termination or a constructive termination within a specified period before or after a change in control as a means of reinforcing and encouraging the continued attention and dedication of our executives to their duties of employment without personal distraction or conflict of interest in circumstances that could arise from the occurrence of a change in control.
Our Transition Protection Plan (the “Protection Plan”), under which the foregoing change in control severance benefits are provided, also assists in the retention and attraction of senior individuals by reducing their concern for financial security in the event of a job loss in connection with a change of control. The terms of these severance arrangements are described below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
In fiscal year 2020, the following changes were made to the Protection Plan:
• Limited the time period of change in control coverage to a defined period of 3 months before and 18 months after
• Implemented a change where the benefits for change in control include a double trigger to include a qualifying event and involuntary termination or constructive termination
• In the event of a change in control and a resulting involuntary termination or constructive termination, only change in control benefits shall apply and removal of the overlap in benefits
• Change in control benefits include 24 months of base pay, two years annual incentive plan payout at target, and current year incentive plan at target on a pro-rata basis
In fiscal year 2021, the Committee approved a further amendment to the Protection Plan to align one aspect of the constructive termination definition to the comparable definition in the Company’s shareholder-approved 2015 Incentive Award Plan that better aligns with current market practices.
The Company believes that the interests of shareholders will be best served if the interests of its executive officers are aligned with them, and providing these changes in control benefits should eliminate, or at least reduce, the reluctance of the Company’s executives to pursue potential change in control transactions that may be in the best interests of shareholders.
As part of a negotiated agreement, on August 27, 2020, Mr. Twyman, President of Cubic Mission Solutions departed from Cubic as a result of the combination of the two defense segments. In exchange for a customary release of claims, Mr. Twyman received a severance payment equal to six months of base pay, the right to receive an annual incentive plan payment for fiscal year 2020 similar to other employees on the annual incentive plan, 12 months of COBRA coverage and accelerated or continued vesting in certain restricted stock units. In addition, Mr. Twyman’s PRSUs were eligible for continued vesting pursuant to the terms of the award agreements.
72
Deductibility of Executive Compensation
As part of its role, the Executive Compensation Committee reviews and considers the deductibility of our executive compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 162(m) generally limits the tax deduction for compensation in excess of one million dollars paid to certain executive officers. This Committee does not necessarily limit executive compensation to the amount deductible under that provision.
In its review and establishment of compensation programs and awards for our NEOs, the Committee considers the anticipated deductibility or non-deductibility of the compensation as only one factor in assessing whether a particular compensatory arrangement is appropriate, particularly in light of the goals of maintaining a competitive executive compensation system generally (i.e., paying for performance and maximizing shareholder return).
The Executive Compensation Committee reserves the right to use their judgment to authorize compensation payments that do not qualify for the compensation deduction, if, in light of all applicable circumstances, they believe that such payments are appropriate and in the Company’s best interests and that of our shareholders.
Executive Compensation Committee Report
The Executive Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Cubic Corporation has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and, based on such review and discussions, recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020 and in the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
David F. Melcher, Chair
Prithviraj Banerjee
Carolyn A. Flowers
Janice M. Hamby
73
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES
|
|
|
Summary Compensation Table
The following table shows the compensation for the three fiscal years ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018 earned by our CEO, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and our next three most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executives as of September 30, 2020 and one additional former executive officer who was no longer serving as of September 30, 2020.
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Salary
($)
|
|
Bonus(1)
($)
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(2) ($)
|
|
Stock Awards(3) ($)
|
|
Change in Pension Value(4)
($)
|
|
All Other Compensation(5) ($)
|
|
Total
($)
|
Bradley H. Feldmann
|
|
2020
|
|
964,105
|
|
453,025
|
|
243,029
|
|
4,234,038
|
|
9,350
|
|
41,484
|
|
5,945,030
|
Chairman, President and
|
|
2019
|
|
933,090
|
|
—
|
|
774,120
|
|
4,101,667
|
|
19,435
|
|
53,652
|
|
5,881,964
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
2018
|
|
870,776
|
|
—
|
|
959,372
|
|
2,750,000
|
|
—
|
|
42,583
|
|
4,622,731
|
Anshooman Aga
|
|
2020
|
|
512,372
|
|
165,487
|
|
88,776
|
|
1,129,091
|
|
—
|
|
25,981
|
|
1,921,707
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
2019
|
|
478,938
|
|
—
|
|
334,815
|
|
1,025,450
|
|
—
|
|
34,901
|
|
1,874,104
|
and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
2018
|
|
435,388
|
|
—
|
|
383,749
|
|
500,000
|
|
—
|
|
276,470
|
|
1,595,607
|
Michael Knowles
|
|
2020
|
|
434,821
|
|
30,253
|
|
185,837
|
|
752,762
|
|
—
|
|
13,124
|
|
1,416,797
|
Senior Vice President, Cubic Corporation and President, Cubic Mission and Performance Solutions
|
|
2019
|
|
329,809
|
|
—
|
|
287,672
|
|
512,725
|
|
—
|
|
22,358
|
|
1,152,564
|
Grace G. Lee
|
|
2020
|
|
398,224
|
|
97,071
|
|
52,074
|
|
658,654
|
|
—
|
|
27,394
|
|
1,233,417
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources and Diversity Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey B. Lowinger
|
|
2020
|
|
232,698
|
|
264,345
|
|
160,930
|
|
800,000
|
|
—
|
|
1,092
|
|
1,459,065
|
Senior Vice President, Cubic Corporation and President, Cubic Transportation Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael R. Twyman(6)
|
|
2020
|
|
515,091
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
752,762
|
|
—
|
|
1,208,479
|
|
2,476,332
|
Former Senior Vice
|
|
2019
|
|
511,288
|
|
—
|
|
522,780
|
|
717,802
|
|
—
|
|
41,236
|
|
1,793,106
|
President, Cubic Corporation and President, Cubic Mission Solutions
|
|
2018
|
|
473,901
|
|
100,000
|
|
328,512
|
|
500,000
|
|
—
|
|
31,357
|
|
1,433,770
|
74
|
Name
|
Final Annual Incentive Award Value
($)
|
/
|
Closing Price on Grant Date
($)
|
=
|
Final Annual Incentive Award Granted in Stock Awards (Total RSUs and PRSUs) (#)
|
RSUs Granted (#)
|
x
|
Closing Price on Grant Date
($)
|
=
|
ASC 718 Grant Date Fair Value of RSUs
($)
|
PRSUs Granted (at “Target”) (#)
|
x
|
ASC 718 Grant Date Fair Value Per Unit of PRSUs
($)
|
=
|
ASC 718 Grant Date Fair Value of PRSUs (at
“Target”)(a)
($)
|
ASC 718 Grant Date Fair Value of RSUs and PRSUs (at “Target”)
($)
|
Bradley H. Feldmann
|
$822,753
|
|
59.55
|
|
13,816
|
6,908
|
|
59.55
|
|
411,376
|
6,908
|
|
52.51
|
|
362,743
|
774,120
|
Anshooman Aga
|
$355,849
|
|
59.55
|
|
5,976
|
2,988
|
|
59.55
|
|
177,925
|
2,988
|
|
52.51
|
|
156,890
|
334,815
|
Michael R. Twyman
|
$555,623
|
|
59.55
|
|
9,330
|
4,665
|
|
59.55
|
|
277,812
|
4,665
|
|
52.51
|
|
244,969
|
522,780
|
Michael Knowles
|
$305,744
|
|
59.55
|
|
5,134
|
2,567
|
|
59.55
|
|
152,872
|
2,567
|
|
52.51
|
|
134,800
|
287,672
|
75
|
Name
|
RSUs Granted (#)
|
x
|
Closing Price on Grant Date
($)
|
=
|
ASC 718 Grant Date Fair Value of RSUs
($)
|
PRSUs Granted (at “Target”)
(#)
|
x
|
ASC 718 Grant Date Fair Value Per Unit of PRSUs
($)
|
=
|
ASC 718 Grant Date Fair Value of PRSUs (at “Target”)(a)
($)
|
ASC 718 Grant Date Fair Value of RSUs and PRSUs (at “Target”)
($)
|
Bradley H. Feldmann
|
37,784
|
|
59.55
|
|
2,250,000
|
37,784
|
|
52.51
|
|
1,984,038
|
4,234,038
|
Anshooman Aga
|
10,076
|
|
59.55
|
|
600,000
|
10,076
|
|
52.51
|
|
529,091
|
1,129,091
|
Michael Knowles
|
6,718
|
|
59.55
|
|
400,000
|
6,718
|
|
52.51
|
|
352,762
|
752,762
|
Grace G. Lee
|
5,878
|
|
59.55
|
|
350,000
|
5,878
|
|
52.51
|
|
308,654
|
658,654
|
Michael R. Twyman
|
6,718
|
|
59.55
|
|
400,000
|
6,718
|
|
52.51
|
|
352,762
|
752,762
|
All Other Compensation – Detail
|
|
Name
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Life Insurance Premiums(1)
($)
|
|
Profit Sharing and 401(k) Match(2)
($)
|
|
Car Allowance
($)
|
|
Personal Travel
($)
|
|
Financial Planning(3)
($)
|
|
Severance Agreement(4)
($)
|
|
Other(5)
($)
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
|
Bradley H. Feldmann
|
|
2020
|
|
2,580
|
|
17,632
|
|
7,200
|
|
—
|
|
14,072
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
41,484
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2,580
|
|
28,872
|
|
7,200
|
|
—
|
|
15,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
53,652
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2,550
|
|
28,247
|
|
7,200
|
|
—
|
|
2,348
|
|
—
|
|
2,238
|
|
42,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anshooman Aga
|
|
2020
|
|
831
|
|
12,138
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
10,879
|
|
—
|
|
2,133
|
|
25,981
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
600
|
|
26,729
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5,876
|
|
—
|
|
1,696
|
|
34,901
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
600
|
|
26,166
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
249,704
|
|
276,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Knowles
|
|
2020
|
|
1,380
|
|
8,198
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,104
|
|
—
|
|
2,442
|
|
13,124
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
1,035
|
|
20,823
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
500
|
|
22,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grace G. Lee
|
|
2020
|
|
1,380
|
|
9,756
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
16,258
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
27,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey B. Lowinger
|
|
2020
|
|
1,092
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael R. Twyman
|
|
2020
|
|
3,490
|
|
11,621
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4,306
|
|
1,189,062
|
|
—
|
|
1,208,479
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2,580
|
|
24,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,637
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
41,236
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2,550
|
|
28,807
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
31,357
|
76
CEO Pay Ratio
PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE
As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information regarding the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of Mr. Feldmann, our CEO. The pay ratio included in this information is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner that is intended to be consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.
For fiscal year 2020, our last completed fiscal year:
• the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of our company (other than our CEO) was $72,209; and
• the annual total compensation of our CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table included elsewhere in this proxy statement, was $5,945,030.
Based on this information, for fiscal year 2020, the ratio of the median of the total compensation of all employees of the Company to the annual total compensation of Mr. Feldmann, our CEO, was 82 to 1.
Determining the Median Employee
SEC rules allow us to identify our median employee once every three years unless there has been a change to our employee population or employee compensation arrangements that we believe would result in a significant change in our pay ratio disclosure. We determined that there were no significant changes to our global employee population, our employee compensation plans or the compensation of our fiscal year 2018 median employee that would make it inappropriate to use our fiscal year 2018 median employee again for this fiscal year 2020 disclosure. To identify the median employee in fiscal year 2018, we determined our median employee by measuring total annual cash compensation, which was consistently applied to all of our employees included in the calculation. Compensation was annualized for employees who did not work the entire 12-month period. We did not make any cost-of-living adjustments in identifying our fiscal year 2018 median employee. We did convert all total cash compensation figures to USD using the applicable exchange rate on November 27, 2018. Our measurement date was September 30, 2018 for purposes of determining our employee population for the analysis.
Compensation Measure and Annual Total Compensation of “Median Employee”
With respect to the total annual compensation of the “median employee,” we calculated the elements of such employee’s compensation for fiscal year 2020 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K, resulting in annual total compensation of $72,209.
With respect to the annual total compensation of our CEO, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column of our fiscal year 2020 Summary Compensation Table included in this proxy statement.
77
Grants of Plan-Based Awards Fiscal Year 2020
The following table reflects the incentive plan awards to the NEOs during fiscal year 2020.
Name
|
Grant Date
|
Executive Compensation Committee Approval
Date
|
Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards(1)
|
|
Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(2)(5)
|
All Other Stock Awards:
Number of Shares of Stock or
Units(3)(5)
|
Grant Date
Fair Value of Stock
Awards(4)(5)
($)
|
Target
($)
|
Maximum
($)
|
|
Threshold
Shares
|
Target
Shares
|
Maximum
Shares
|
Bradley H. Feldmann
|
|
|
$1,072,500
|
$2,037,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/29/2019
|
11/29/2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,692
|
$2,661,371
|
|
11/29/2019
|
11/29/2019
|
|
|
|
22,346
|
44,692
|
89,384
|
|
$2,346,777
|
Anshooman Aga
|
|
|
$410,432
|
$779,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/29/2019
|
11/29/2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,064
|
$777,935
|
|
11/29/2019
|
11/29/2019
|
|
|
|
6,532
|
13,064
|
26,128
|
|
$685,991
|
Michael Knowles
|
|
|
$294,000
|
$558,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/29/2019
|
11/29/2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,285
|
$552,865
|
|
11/29/2019
|
11/29/2019
|
|
|
|
4,643
|
9,285
|
18,570
|
|
$487,555
|
Grace G. Lee
|
|
|
$240,750
|
$457,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/29/2019
|
11/29/2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,516
|
$566,643
|
|
11/29/2019
|
11/29/2019
|
|
|
|
2,939
|
5,878
|
11,756
|
|
$308,654
|
Jeffrey B. Lowinger
|
|
|
$385,500
|
$732,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/27/2020
|
4/27/2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,683
|
$800,000
|
Michael R. Twyman
|
|
|
$386,250
|
$733,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/29/2019
|
11/29/2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,383
|
$677,801
|
|
11/29/2019
|
11/29/2019
|
|
|
|
5,692
|
11,383
|
22,766
|
|
$597,721
|
78
|
Name
|
RSUs Granted (#)
|
x
|
Share Price at Equity Award Date
($)
|
=
|
ASC 718 Grant Date Fair Value of RSUs
($)
|
PRSUs Granted
(#)
|
x
|
Share Price at Equity Award Date
($)
|
x
|
ASC 718 Grant Date Fair Value of PRSUs
($)
|
Bradley H. Feldmann
|
6,908
|
|
59.55
|
|
411,371
|
6,908
|
|
52.51
|
|
362,739
|
Anshooman Aga
|
2,988
|
|
59.55
|
|
177,935
|
2,988
|
|
52.51
|
|
156,900
|
Michael Knowles
|
2,567
|
|
59.55
|
|
152,865
|
2,567
|
|
52.51
|
|
134,793
|
Grace G. Lee
|
3,638
|
|
59.55
|
|
216,643
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
Michael R. Twyman
|
4,665
|
|
59.55
|
|
277,801
|
4,665
|
|
52.51
|
|
244,959
|
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The table below provides information on the current holdings of stock awards by the NEOs as of September 30, 2020.
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(1)
(#)
|
|
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(2)
($)
|
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (3)
(#)
|
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares,
Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
($)(2)
|
Bradley H. Feldmann
|
|
11/29/2019
|
|
44,692
|
|
$2,599,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/29/2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,692
|
|
$2,599,734
|
|
|
11/21/2018
|
|
23,386
|
|
$1,360,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/21/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,364
|
|
$3,627,714
|
|
|
11/27/2017
|
|
11,197
|
|
$651,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/14/2016
|
|
5,972
|
|
$347,391
|
|
|
|
|
Anshooman Aga
|
|
11/29/2019
|
|
13,064
|
|
$759,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/29/2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,064
|
|
$759,933
|
|
|
11/21/2018
|
|
5,847
|
|
$340,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/21/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,592
|
|
$906,987
|
|
|
11/27/2017
|
|
2,036
|
|
$118,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/27/2017
|
|
541
|
|
$31,470
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Knowles
|
|
11/29/2019
|
|
9,285
|
|
$540,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/29/2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,285
|
|
$540,108
|
|
|
11/21/2018
|
|
2,923
|
|
$170,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/21/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,796
|
|
$453,493
|
|
|
11/27/2017
|
|
448
|
|
$26,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/14/2016
|
|
270
|
|
$15,706
|
|
|
|
|
Grace G. Lee
|
|
11/29/2019
|
|
9,516
|
|
$553,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/29/2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,878
|
|
$341,923
|
|
|
11/21/2018
|
|
12,278
|
|
$714,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/21/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,796
|
|
$453,493
|
Jeffrey B. Lowinger
|
|
4/27/2020
|
|
22,683
|
|
$1,319,470
|
|
|
|
|
79
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table provides information concerning total RSU and PRSU vesting for each of the NEOs during fiscal year 2020.
|
Stock Awards
|
|
Name
|
Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)(1)
|
Value Realized on
Vesting
($)(2)
|
|
Bradley H. Feldmann
|
59,979
|
3,715,477
|
|
Anshooman Aga
|
10,026
|
616,136
|
|
Michael Knowles
|
3,123
|
197,508
|
|
Grace G. Lee
|
3,314
|
223,861
|
|
Jeffrey B. Lowinger
|
—
|
—
|
|
Michael R. Twyman(3)
|
24,689
|
1,484,044
|
|
80
Pension Benefits Fiscal Year 2020
The following table sets forth the present value of accumulated benefits under pension plans for the NEOs.
Name
|
Number of Years Credited Service
(#)
|
Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit Under Life
Annuity Election(2)
($)
|
Payment During
Last Fiscal Year
($)
|
Bradley H. Feldmann(1)
|
22
|
120,077
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Fiscal Year 2020
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the participation in the Deferred Compensation Plan by our NEOs for fiscal year 2020.(1)
Name
|
Executive
Contributions in
FY 2020(2)
($)
|
Aggregate Plan
Earnings in FY
2020(3)
($)
|
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
|
Aggregate Plan
Balance at End of
FY 2020(4)
($)
|
Bradley H. Feldmann
|
—
|
7,393
|
—
|
336,301
|
Jeffrey B. Lowinger
|
28,559
|
423
|
—
|
28,982
|
81
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
GENERAL SEVERANCE POLICY
The Company has a severance policy (the “Severance Policy”) applicable to its full time U.S.-based employees, including the NEOs. In the event of a Company-originated termination without cause, the eligible individual who has completed three years of employment with the Company is offered the opportunity to receive, in exchange for signing a general release, a lump sum payment of one week of base pay at their current rate for each 12 months of employment, paid in installments over the severance period, and payment of medical and dental coverage under COBRA for up to 12 months (with the number of months of COBRA coverage dependent on the number of years of service). Outplacement consultation may be provided at the Company’s discretion. Employees in the position of Vice President or above will receive a minimum of 12 weeks’ severance pay and 3 months of COBRA coverage. Non-executive employees with less than three years of employment will receive two weeks’ severance pay.
In individual circumstances, an NEO may be offered alternative arrangements to be negotiated. These severance benefits are not offset by the Company’s normal retirement benefits. Other than the COBRA payments, the cash severance payments under the Severance Policy would be paid to a NEO in addition to any payments under the Protection Plan, as described below, in the event his or her termination of employment by the Company without cause were to occur under the circumstances described under the Protection Plan.
TRANSITION PROTECTION PLAN
The Company’s Protection Plan is intended to be made available upon specific approval of an individual for participation in the Protection Plan by the Executive Compensation Committee. It is intended to benefit selected principal officers and other selected key personnel. The Executive Compensation Committee has approved participation in the Protection Plan by each of the NEOs.
If there is any change of control of the Company (as defined below), and within 3 months before or 18 months after such change in control, a participant’s employment involuntarily terminates without cause (as defined below), or the participant resigns for good reason (as defined below), then the Company would be obligated to:
(1) pay such person an amount equal to 24 months of the NEO’s current salary, two times the NEO’s annual incentive plan at target and a pro-rated portion of the NEO’s annual incentive
plan at target for the year of termination, which amount shall be paid in equal installments over 24 months, and
(2) continue for 18 months the participant’s participation in the medical and dental plans of the Company in which such participant participated at the time of termination.
Miscellaneous additional benefits, including outplacement service of up to $6,000, may also be provided. In unusual cases, moving of household goods may also be reimbursed by the Company under the Protection Plan.
A “change in control” occurs when a “person” acquires sufficient shares of our voting stock to elect a majority of our directors, assuming 90% of outstanding shares vote; a merger resulting in a substantial change in the directors; and certain other events.
An “involuntary termination without cause” occurs when there is any involuntary termination of employment without (1) a willful and continued failure of the employee to perform substantially his or her duties, or (2) his or her gross negligence or breach of fiduciary duty involving personal profit (etc.) or (3) his or her conviction or plea of no contest or guilty to state or federal felony criminal laws.
A resignation “for good reason” occurs when the authority, duties, function or responsibilities of the employee are materially reduced, his or her base salary is reduced, his or her bonus participation opportunity is reduced by more than 50%, his or her job location is substantially changed, or the Company materially breaches the Protection Plan.
Following termination, to receive monthly payments the executive must execute a general release and must not breach the Company’s proprietary information policy and must not interfere with the employees, customers or suppliers of the Company.
LONG-TERM EQUITY INCENTIVE AWARDS
The long-term equity incentive awards granted to the NEOs may vest under certain circumstances in the event of a change in control of the Company and/or certain terminations of employment. For more information about the accelerated vesting provisions applicable to these awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Section 3: Fiscal Year 2020 Executive Compensation Decisions” above.
82
DEFERRED COMPENSATION AND RETIREMENT BENEFITS
Certain of the NEOs are participants in the Pension Plans. For more information about payments payable to the NEOs under the pension plans upon a termination of employment, please see the Pension Benefits table above. Certain of the NEOs are participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan. For more information about amounts payable to the NEOs under the Deferred Compensation
|
|
Plan upon a termination of employment, please see the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Fiscal Year 2020 table above.
Retirement benefits also include the continued vesting of long-term incentive awards. In order to receive retirement benefits, NEOs must be at least 60 years of age, and have served a minimum of 10 years of continuous service. They must also provide a one-year notice of retirement.
|
|
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control Table
|
The following table summarizes potential change in control and termination payments to each NEO. The five right-hand columns describe the payments that would apply in five different potential scenarios — a termination without cause apart from a change in control; a termination of employment as a result of the NEO’s resignation for good reason or termination of employment by us other than for cause, in each case within 3 months prior to or 18 months following a change in control (or 12 months following a change in control the case of certain equity awards); a change in control without a termination of employment; the NEO’s death; or the NEO’s termination of employment as a result of his or her disability. The table assumes that the termination or change in control occurred on September 30, 2020. None of the NEOs qualified for the enhanced retirement vesting provisions of certain of our equity awards as of September 30, 2020,
|
|
so the retirement scenario is not included in the table. For purposes of estimating the value of accelerated equity awards to be received in the event of a termination of employment or change in control, we have assumed a price per share of our common stock of $58.17, which represents the closing market price of our common stock as reported on the NYSE on September 30, 2020.
As part of a negotiated agreement, on August 27, 2020, Michael Twyman, President of Cubic Mission Solutions departed from Cubic as a result of the combination of the two defense segments. Mr. Twyman received six months of base pay as his severance payment, a payment under his annual incentive plan based on actual results for the year, 12 months of COBRA coverage, and vesting of his long-term incentive plan pursuant to the rules of the plan.
|
Name
|
|
Benefit
|
|
Termination w/o Cause Apart from a Change in Control
($)
|
|
After Change in Control Termination w/o Cause or for Good Reason
($)
|
|
Change in Control(6)
($)
|
|
Death(7)
($)
|
|
Disability(8) ($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bradley H. Feldmann
|
|
Cash Severance
|
|
412,500
|
(1)
|
|
4,507,500
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare and Other Insurance(3)
|
|
29,421
|
|
|
44,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outplacement
|
|
—
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards – Accelerated Vesting
|
|
4,137,589
|
(4)
|
|
7,558,552
|
(5)
|
|
3,116,574
|
|
10,675,126
|
|
9,118,981
|
|
|
Total Benefit Amount
|
|
4,579,510
|
|
|
12,116,183
|
|
|
3,116,574
|
|
10,675,126
|
|
9,118,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anshooman Aga
|
|
Cash Severance
|
|
118,394
|
(1)
|
|
1,965,338
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare and Other Insurance(3)
|
|
25,305
|
|
|
37,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outplacement
|
|
—
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards – Accelerated Vesting
|
|
930,524
|
(4)
|
|
2,009,890
|
(5)
|
|
690,362
|
|
2,700,251
|
|
2,184,586
|
|
|
Total Benefit Amount
|
|
1,074,223
|
|
|
4,019,185
|
|
|
690,362
|
|
2,700,251
|
|
2,184,586
|