SPR Spirit Aerosystems Holdings Inc

Schedule 14A Information

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):

MERGER PROPOSED — YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

Dear Stockholders of Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc.:

On June 30, 2024, Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. (“Spirit”) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (as it may be amended from time to time, the “Merger Agreement”), with The Boeing Company (“Boeing”) and Sphere Acquisition Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of Boeing (“Merger Sub”), providing for the merger of Merger Sub with and into Spirit (the “Merger”), and for Spirit to be the surviving corporation in the Merger. Upon completion of the Merger, Spirit would be a wholly owned subsidiary of Boeing.

On the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), each share of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Spirit (“Spirit Common Stock”) that is issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than shares of Spirit Common Stock owned by Spirit, Boeing or any of their respective wholly owned subsidiaries, in each case not held on behalf of third parties) will be automatically cancelled and cease to exist and will be converted into the right to receive a number of shares of common stock, par value $5.00 per share, of Boeing (“Boeing Common Stock,” and such number of shares of Boeing Common Stock, the “Per Share Merger Consideration”) equal to an exchange ratio (the “Exchange Ratio”), which will depend on the volume weighted average price per share of Boeing Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange for the 15 consecutive trading days ending on and including the second full trading day prior to the Effective Time (the “Boeing Stock Price”). If the Boeing Stock Price is greater than $149.00 but less than $206.94, the Exchange Ratio will be the quotient obtained by dividing $37.25 by the Boeing Stock Price, rounded to four decimal places; if the Boeing Stock Price is greater than or equal to $206.94, the Exchange Ratio will be 0.1800; and if the Boeing Stock Price is equal to or less than $149.00, the Exchange Ratio will be 0.2500. Accordingly, if the Boeing Stock Price were between $149.00 and $206.94, the implied value of the Per Share Merger Consideration would be $37.25; if the Boeing Stock Price were greater than $206.94, the implied value of the Per Share Merger Consideration would be greater than $37.25; and if the Boeing Stock Price were less than $149.00, the implied value of the Per Share Merger Consideration would be less than $37.25. The Boeing Stock Price and the actual value of the Per Share Merger Consideration will depend on the trading price of Boeing Common Stock, which is subject to fluctuation, including during the period until the Effective Time. For illustrative purposes only, the following table presents the Exchange Ratio and the implied value of the Per Share Merger Consideration based on different values for the Boeing Stock Price:

Shares of Spirit Common Stock are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “SPR.” Shares of Boeing Common Stock are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “BA.” We encourage you to obtain current market quotations for both Spirit Common Stock and Boeing Common Stock.

In connection with the proposed Merger, Spirit will hold a special meeting of its stockholders (the “Special Meeting”). At the Special Meeting, the holders of Spirit Common Stock will be asked to vote on (i) a proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement (the “Merger Agreement Proposal”), (ii) a proposal to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to Spirit’s named executive officers that is based on or otherwise relates to the Merger (the “Advisory Compensation Proposal”) and (iii) a proposal to approve one or more adjournments of the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to permit solicitation of additional votes or proxies if there are not sufficient votes to approve the Merger Agreement Proposal (the “Adjournment Proposal”). Approval of the Merger Agreement Proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Spirit Common Stock entitled to vote thereon, and approval of the Advisory Compensation Proposal and Adjournment Proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast affirmatively and negatively on the applicable proposal, assuming a quorum is present. The Special Meeting will be held virtually via live audio webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SPR2025SM, on January 31, 2025, at 11:30 a.m. Central Time. The board of directors of Spirit unanimously recommends that stockholders of Spirit vote (i) “FOR” the Merger Agreement Proposal, (ii) “FOR” the Advisory Compensation Proposal and (iii) “FOR” the Adjournment Proposal.

Your vote is very important. The obligations of Spirit and Boeing to complete the Merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of a number of conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, including approval of the Merger Agreement Proposal by the stockholders of Spirit. We cannot complete the Merger unless the stockholders of Spirit vote to approve the Merger Agreement Proposal.

This proxy statement/prospectus contains or references detailed information about Spirit, Boeing, the Special Meeting, the Merger, the Merger Agreement and the business to be considered by the stockholders of Spirit at the Special Meeting. Please carefully read this entire proxy statement/prospectus, including the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 28 of this proxy statement/prospectus for a discussion of the risks relating to the Merger. You also can obtain information about Boeing and Spirit from documents that they have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Sincerely,

Robert D. Johnson

Chair of the Board

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of the securities to be issued in connection with the Merger or determined if this proxy statement/prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

This proxy statement/prospectus is dated December 20, 2024 and is first being mailed to stockholders of Spirit on or about December 26, 2024.

SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.

3801 South Oliver Street

Wichita, Kansas 67210

(316) 526-9000

NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON JANUARY 31, 2025

To the Stockholders of Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc.:

You are cordially invited to attend a special meeting of stockholders (the “Special Meeting”) of Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. (“Spirit”), which will be conducted virtually via live audio webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SPR2025SM, on January 31, 2025, at 11:30 a.m. Central Time. There will be no physical location for the Special Meeting. The record date for the Special Meeting is December 20, 2024 (the “Record Date”). Only holders of record of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Spirit (“Spirit Common Stock”) on the Record Date are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Special Meeting.

At the Special Meeting, we plan to ask you to vote on:

The accompanying proxy statement/prospectus describes the proposals listed above in more detail. You should carefully read and consider the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus in its entirety, including the annexes to the proxy statement/prospectus, and the documents incorporated by reference in the proxy statement/prospectus, as they contain important information about, among other things, the Merger and how it affects you.

The board of directors of Spirit (the “Spirit Board”) has unanimously (a) approved and declared advisable the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, (b) determined that the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby are in the best interests of Spirit and its stockholders, (c) resolved to recommend adoption of the Merger Agreement by the stockholders entitled to vote thereon and (d) directed that the Merger Agreement be submitted to stockholders of Spirit for adoption at a meeting of stockholders of Spirit to be held to consider the adoption of the Merger Agreement. The Spirit Board

recommends that stockholders of Spirit vote (i) “FOR” the Merger Agreement Proposal, (ii) “FOR” the Advisory Compensation Proposal and (iii) “FOR” the Adjournment Proposal.

You will be able to attend the Special Meeting by visiting the Special Meeting website at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SPR2025SM and entering a 16-digit control number. If you hold your shares of Spirit Common Stock as a stockholder of record, your 16-digit control number will be printed on your proxy card. If instead you hold your shares of Spirit Common Stock through an account with a bank, broker or other nominee, your bank, broker or other nominee may provide you with your 16-digit control number on the voting instruction form it furnishes to you; otherwise, you should contact your bank, broker or other nominee (preferably at least five business days before the date of the Special Meeting) for instructions on attending the Special Meeting. Refer to the section entitled “Questions and Answers” beginning on page 1 of the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus for additional information on how to participate in the Special Meeting.

Your vote is very important, regardless of the number of shares that you own. The Merger cannot be completed unless Spirit Stockholders adopt the Merger Agreement.

Please vote as promptly as possible, whether or not you expect to attend the Special Meeting via the Special Meeting website. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee, please follow the instructions on the voting instruction form furnished by the bank, broker or other nominee. If you hold shares in your own name, please submit a proxy to have your shares voted as promptly as possible by (i) logging onto the website shown on your proxy card and following the instructions to vote online, (ii) dialing the toll-free number shown on your proxy card and following the instructions to vote by telephone or (iii) completing, dating, signing and returning the enclosed proxy card in the postage-prepaid envelope provided, so that your shares may be represented and voted at the Special Meeting if you later decide not to attend or become unable to attend. Submitting a proxy will also help to secure a quorum and avoid added solicitation costs. Submitting a proxy will not prevent you from voting at the Special Meeting via the Special Meeting website; any stockholder who is present at the Special Meeting via the Special Meeting website may vote, thereby revoking any previously submitted proxy. In addition, a proxy may also be revoked in writing before the Special Meeting in the manner described in the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus.

If you have questions about the matters to be voted on at the Special Meeting, would like additional copies of the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus or need help voting your shares of Spirit Common Stock, please contact Spirit’s proxy solicitor:

Innisfree M&A Incorporated

501 Madison Ave., 20th Floor

New York, New York 10022

Stockholders, please call toll-free: (877) 456-3513

Banks and Brokerage Firms, please call: (212) 750-5833

By Order of the Board of Directors,

David E. Myers

Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

December 20, 2024

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

This proxy statement/prospectus incorporates by reference important business and financial information about The Boeing Company (“Boeing”) and Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. (“Spirit”) from other documents that is not included in or delivered with this proxy statement/prospectus, as permitted by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). For a listing of the documents incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus, see the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 204 of this proxy statement/prospectus.

Copies of any of the documents incorporated by reference herein, excluding exhibits to those documents unless specifically incorporated by reference herein, are available without charge to stockholders of Spirit (“Spirit Stockholders”) upon written or oral request. To receive a copy of any such documents, please contact Boeing, Spirit or Spirit’s proxy solicitor at the following addresses and telephone numbers:

If you would like to request any of the documents that are incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus, please do so by January 24, 2025, which is five business days prior to the date of the special meeting of Spirit Stockholders (the “Special Meeting”), in order to receive them before the meeting.

You may also obtain any of the documents incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus without charge through the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. In addition, you may obtain copies of documents filed by Boeing with the SEC by accessing Boeing’s website at http://investors.boeing.com/investors and documents filed by Spirit with the SEC by accessing Spirit’s website at www.investor.spiritaero.com/corporate-profile/default.aspx. Boeing and Spirit are not incorporating the contents of the websites of the SEC, Boeing or Spirit into this proxy statement/prospectus. Boeing and Spirit are providing the information about how you can obtain certain documents that are incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus at these websites only for your convenience.

ABOUT THIS PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS

This proxy statement/prospectus, which forms part of a registration statement on Form S-4 filed with the SEC by Boeing, constitutes a prospectus of Boeing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), with respect to the shares of common stock, par value $5.00 per share, of Boeing (“Boeing Common Stock”) to be issued to Spirit Stockholders in connection with the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated June 30, 2024 (as it may be amended from time to time, the “Merger Agreement”), among Spirit, Boeing and Sphere Acquisition Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of Boeing (“Merger Sub”), providing for the merger of Merger Sub with and into Spirit (the “Merger”). This proxy statement/prospectus also constitutes a proxy statement of Spirit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). It also constitutes a notice of meeting with respect to the Special Meeting.

Information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus regarding Boeing has been provided by Boeing, and information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus regarding Spirit has been provided by Spirit. Boeing and Spirit have both contributed to the information related to the Merger contained in this proxy statement/prospectus.

Boeing and Spirit have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different from that contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this proxy statement/prospectus. This proxy statement/prospectus is dated December 20, 2024, and you should assume that the information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus is accurate only as of such date unless the information specifically indicates that another date applies. You should also assume that the information incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus is accurate only as of the date of the incorporated document unless the information specifically indicates that another date applies. Neither the mailing of this proxy statement/prospectus to Spirit Stockholders nor the issuance by Boeing of shares of Boeing Common Stock in connection with the Merger will create any implication to the contrary.

This proxy statement/prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, or the solicitation of a proxy, in any jurisdiction to or from any person to whom it is unlawful to make any such offer or solicitation in such jurisdiction.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

The following are some questions that you, as a Spirit Stockholder, may have regarding the Merger, the issuance of shares of Boeing Common Stock to Spirit Stockholders in connection with the Merger and the matters being considered at the Special Meeting, accompanied by the answers to those questions. We urge you to carefully read the remainder of this proxy statement/prospectus because the information in this section does not provide all the information that might be important to you with respect to the Merger, the issuance of shares of Boeing Common Stock in connection with the Merger and the matters being considered at the Special Meeting. Additional important information is contained in the annexes to, and the documents incorporated by reference in, this proxy statement/prospectus.

This proxy statement/prospectus, which you should read carefully, contains important information about the Merger, the Special Meeting and the matters being considered at the Special Meeting, including the Merger Agreement Proposal. This proxy statement/prospectus constitutes both a proxy statement of Spirit and a prospectus of Boeing. It is a proxy statement because the board of directors of Spirit (the “Spirit Board”) is soliciting proxies from Spirit Stockholders in connection with the Special Meeting. It is a prospectus because Boeing will issue shares of Boeing Common Stock in exchange for outstanding shares of Spirit Common Stock in the Merger.

1

The number of Merger Consideration Shares is subject to fluctuation with the market value of Boeing Common Stock until the Boeing Stock Price has been determined. The Boeing Stock Price and the actual value of the Per Share Merger Consideration will depend on the trading price of Boeing Common Stock, which is subject to fluctuation, including during the period until the Effective Time. For illustrative purposes only, the following table presents the Exchange Ratio and the implied value of the Per Share Merger Consideration based on different values for the Boeing Stock Price:

The market price of shares of Boeing Common Stock that Spirit Stockholders receive at the Effective Time could be greater than, less than or the same as the market price of shares of Boeing Common Stock on the date of this proxy statement/prospectus or at the time of the Special Meeting. In addition, the difference between the value, immediately following the Merger, of the consideration that Spirit Stockholders will receive in the Merger and the value of Spirit Common Stock immediately prior to the Merger will depend on the market price of shares of Boeing Common Stock and Spirit Common Stock at the Effective Time. Accordingly, you should obtain current market quotations for Boeing Common Stock and Spirit Common Stock before deciding how to vote with respect to the Merger Agreement Proposal. Shares of Spirit Common

2

Stock are listed on the NYSE under the symbol “SPR.” Shares of Boeing Common Stock are listed on the NYSE under the symbol “BA.”

If you hold your shares of Spirit Common Stock in certificated form, or in book-entry form but not through DTC, after receiving the proper documentation from you, following the Effective Time, the Exchange Agent will deliver to you the Per Share Merger Consideration and a check in the amount of any cash in lieu of fractional share of Boeing Common Stock to which you are entitled under the Merger Agreement.

3

Approval of the Advisory Compensation Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal requires, in each case, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast affirmatively and negatively on the applicable proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will have no effect on the Advisory Compensation Proposal or the Adjournment Proposal, assuming a quorum is present.

4

For more information regarding these interests, see the sections entitled “The Merger—Interests of Certain Spirit Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger” and “Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Merger—Spirit’s directors and executive officers have interests in the Merger that may be different from, or in addition to, the interests of Spirit Stockholders generally” beginning on pages 98 and 34, respectively, of this proxy statement/prospectus.

In addition, the Merger Agreement includes provisions to facilitate the disposition by Spirit to Airbus SE (“Airbus”) of certain portions of Spirit’s business related to the performance by Spirit and its subsidiaries of their obligations under their supply contracts with Airbus (the “Spirit Airbus Business”), as contemplated by a term sheet entered into on June 30, 2024 between Airbus and Spirit AeroSystems, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Spirit (the “Airbus Term Sheet”). The Merger Agreement also includes provisions to facilitate the potential sale, subject to certain Boeing consent rights, by Spirit to other third parties of specified assets and businesses, some of which include or comprise parts of the Spirit Airbus Business. Such specified assets and businesses, which include, among others, Spirit’s operations in Belfast, Northern Ireland (other than the operations that are part of the Spirit Airbus Business) and Subang, Malaysia, certain of Spirit’s operations in Prestwick, Scotland and Spirit’s Fiber Materials, Inc. business, are referred to herein together with the Spirit Airbus Business as the “Divestiture Assets.”

5

It is not a condition to the Merger that Boeing or Spirit receive a private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) regarding the qualification of the Merger as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code. Nevertheless, Boeing and Spirit filed with the IRS on December 20, 2024 a request (the “Ruling Request”) for a private letter ruling to the effect that the Merger qualifies as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code (the “Ruling”). For additional details, please refer to the section entitled “The Merger—U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger—IRS Private Letter Ruling” beginning on page 111 of this proxy statement/prospectus.

If Boeing and Spirit do not ultimately receive the Ruling, U.S. Holders (as defined in the section entitled “The Merger—U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger” beginning on page 109 of this proxy statement/prospectus) should assume that the Merger will not qualify as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code and that the Merger will be treated as a taxable transaction. If Boeing and Spirit timely receive the Ruling to the satisfaction of Boeing and Spirit, Boeing and Spirit intend to report the Merger consistent with the qualification of the Merger as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code.

Each U.S. Holder (as defined in the section entitled “The Merger—U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger” beginning on page 109 of this proxy statement/prospectus) should consult its own tax advisor with respect to the particular tax consequences of the Merger to such holder. See the section entitled “The Merger—U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger” beginning on page 109 of this proxy statement/prospectus for more information.

6

Either party may waive one or more of the conditions to its obligations to effect the Closing to the extent permitted by applicable law, including, in the case of Boeing, the conditions regarding the accuracy (subject to materiality qualifiers in certain cases) of the representations and warranties of Spirit contained in the Merger Agreement and the absence of a Material Adverse Effect and, in the case of Spirit, the conditions regarding the accuracy (subject to materiality qualifiers in certain cases) of the representations and warranties of Boeing and Merger Sub contained in the Merger Agreement and the absence of a Boeing Material Adverse Effect.

The completion of the Merger is not subject to the approval of Boeing Stockholders or the receipt of financing by Boeing.

See the sections entitled “The Merger Agreement—Conditions to the Closing of the Merger” and “Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Merger—The Merger is subject to conditions, including certain conditions that are beyond Boeing’s and Spirit’s control and may not be satisfied on a timely basis or at all. Failure to complete the Merger could have material adverse effects on

7

Boeing and Spirit” beginning on pages 147 and 29, respectively, of this proxy statement/prospectus for more information.

Upon termination of the Merger Agreement, Spirit may be required to pay Boeing a termination fee of $150 million if the Merger Agreement is terminated under specified circumstances in which the Spirit Board changes its recommendation that Spirit Stockholders adopt the Merger Agreement, Spirit terminates the Merger Agreement in order to accept a Superior Proposal (as defined in the section entitled “The Merger Agreement—No Solicitation of Acquisition Proposals; Change of Recommendation” beginning on page 133 of this proxy statement/prospectus), or Spirit completes a Qualifying Transaction (as defined in the section entitled “The Merger Agreement—Termination Fees” beginning on page 151 of this proxy statement/prospectus) following the termination of the Merger Agreement. Boeing may be required to pay Spirit a termination fee of $300 million (reduced (but not to less than zero) by the aggregate then-outstanding amount of cash advances to be repaid by Spirit and its subsidiaries to Boeing, whether or not then due and payable, pursuant to the applicable agreements governing cash advances by Boeing to Spirit and its subsidiaries) if the Merger Agreement is terminated by Spirit or Boeing under certain specified circumstances in which the Merger Agreement is terminated as a result of failing to obtain the required regulatory approvals by March 31, 2025 (subject to three automatic three-month extensions if on each such date all of the closing conditions except those relating to regulatory approvals have been satisfied or waived) (the “Outside Date”) or as a result of a law or order related to the required regulatory approvals or any applicable antitrust law or foreign investment law that prohibits the completion of the Merger. See the section entitled “The Merger Agreement—Termination Fees” beginning on page 151 of this proxy statement/prospectus for more information.

You will be able to attend the Special Meeting by visiting the Special Meeting website at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SPR2025SM and entering a 16-digit control number. If you hold your shares of Spirit Common Stock as a stockholder of record, your 16-digit control number will be printed on your proxy card. If instead you hold your shares of Spirit Common Stock through an account with a bank, broker or other nominee (that is, if you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name”), your bank, broker or other nominee may provide you with your 16-digit control number on the voting instruction form it furnishes to you; otherwise, you should contact your bank, broker or other nominee (preferably at least five business days before the date of the Special Meeting) to obtain a legal proxy that will permit you to attend, and vote at, the

8

Special Meeting. If you join the Special Meeting by using your 16-digit control number or obtaining a legal proxy and logging in to the Special Meeting website, you will be able to attend and participate in the Special Meeting, submit your questions during the Special Meeting, and vote your shares online during the Special Meeting.

Spirit Stockholders who participate in the Special Meeting via the Special Meeting website will be considered to have attended the Special Meeting and to have been present at the Special Meeting “in person,” including for purposes of determining a quorum and counting votes.

If you hold your shares of Spirit Common Stock through an account with a bank, broker or other nominee (that is, if you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name”), your bank, broker or other nominee that is the holder of record of those shares can give you the right to vote those shares at the Special Meeting. See the answer to the question “How can I attend the Special Meeting?” above for additional information.

Additional information on voting procedures can be found in the section entitled “The Special Meeting” beginning on page 42 of this proxy statement/prospectus.

9

If, for example, you hold your shares of Spirit Common Stock in more than one brokerage account, you will receive a separate voting instruction form for each brokerage account in which you hold shares of Spirit Common Stock. In that case, you should follow the procedures specified by your bank, broker or other nominee to make sure that you vote all of your shares held in those brokerage accounts.

If, for example, you are a holder of record and your shares of Spirit Common Stock are registered in more than one name, you will receive more than one proxy card. Please submit each separate proxy card that you receive (or cast your vote via the Internet or by telephone) by following the instructions set forth in each separate proxy card to ensure that you vote all of the shares of which you are a holder of record.

If your shares of Spirit Common Stock are held through a bank, broker or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of the shares of Spirit Common Stock held in “street name.” In that case, the proxy materials for the Special Meeting have been forwarded to you by your bank, broker or other nominee that is considered, with respect to those shares, to be the stockholder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your bank, broker or other nominee how to vote your shares by following their instructions for voting, and you are also invited to attend and vote at the Special Meeting as described in the answer to the question “How can I attend the Special Meeting?” above.

10

You should instruct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote your shares. Banks, brokers and other nominees that hold shares in “street name” for a beneficial owner of those shares typically have the authority to vote in their discretion on “routine” proposals when they have not received instructions from beneficial owners. However, banks, brokers and other nominees that hold shares in street name for a beneficial owner of those shares are not allowed to exercise voting discretion with respect to the approval of matters that are “non-routine” without specific instructions from the beneficial owner. “Broker non-votes” occur when shares held in street name are present at a stockholder meeting at which at least one item of business is a routine proposal, but the bank, broker or other nominee is not instructed by the beneficial owner of those shares to vote on a particular proposal for which the bank, broker or other nominee does not have discretionary voting power. Under applicable rules, each of the proposals to be voted on at the Special Meeting will be “non-routine,” and therefore, it is expected that there will be no broker non-votes at the Special Meeting. Accordingly, if you are a Spirit Stockholder that beneficially owns shares of Spirit Common Stock held in street name, and you do not instruct your bank, broker or other nominee on how to vote your shares, your bank, broker or other nominee may not vote your shares on the Merger Agreement Proposal, the Advisory Compensation Proposal or the Adjournment Proposal, and your shares will not be considered present and entitled to vote at the Special Meeting for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present at the Special Meeting.

If you are a beneficial owner of Spirit Common Stock held through a bank, broker or other nominee, you must follow the specific instructions provided to you by your bank, broker or other nominee to change or revoke any instructions you have already given to your bank, broker or other nominee. You may also change your vote by attending the Special Meeting and voting via the Special Meeting website during the Special Meeting. See the answer to the question “How can I attend the Special Meeting?” above for additional information.

11

12

Innisfree M&A Incorporated

501 Madison Ave., 20th Floor

New York, New York 10022

Stockholders, please call toll-free: (877) 456-3513

Banks and Brokerage Firms, please call: (212) 750-5833

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

COMPARATIVE PER SHARE MARKET PRICE DATA AND DIVIDENDS

Market Prices

Boeing Common Stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol “BA,” and Spirit Common Stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol “SPR.”

The following table sets forth the last sales price per share of Boeing Common Stock and per share of Spirit Common Stock as reported on the NYSE on June 28, 2024, the trading day before the public announcement of the execution of the Merger Agreement, and on December 19, 2024, the last trading day before the date of this proxy statement/prospectus. The table also shows the number of shares of Boeing Common Stock to be received for each share of Spirit Common Stock and the implied value per share of Spirit Common Stock calculated based on the price of Boeing Common Stock, in each case as of the same two dates.

The market prices of Boeing Common Stock and Spirit Common Stock have fluctuated since the date of the announcement of the execution of the Merger Agreement and will continue to fluctuate prior to the completion of the Merger and, in the case of Boeing Common Stock thereafter. No assurance can be given concerning the market prices of Boeing Common Stock or Spirit Common Stock before completion of the Merger or of Boeing Common Stock after completion of the Merger. Accordingly, these comparisons may not provide meaningful information to stockholders in determining how to vote with respect to the proposals described in this proxy statement/prospectus. We urge you to obtain current market quotations for Boeing Common Stock and Spirit Common Stock and to review carefully the other information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus. Please see the section entitled “Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Merger—Because the market prices of Boeing Common Stock and Spirit Common Stock will fluctuate prior to the completion of the Merger, Spirit Stockholders cannot be sure of the market value of shares of Boeing Common Stock that they will receive in the Merger or the difference between the market value of shares of Boeing Common Stock that they will receive in the Merger and the market value of shares of Spirit Common Stock immediately prior to the Merger” beginning on page 28 of this proxy statement/prospectus.

Dividends

The Boeing Board suspended the declaration and/or payment of cash dividends in March 2020, and Boeing has not declared or paid dividends on shares of Boeing Common Stock since March 6, 2020 when it paid a dividend of $2.055 per share. Boeing last paid a dividend of $2.055 per share on March 6, 2020. The terms of the Merger Agreement limit Boeing’s ability to declare or pay dividends prior to the completion of the Merger.

The Spirit Board suspended Spirit’s quarterly cash dividend in the fourth quarter of 2022, and Spirit has not declared or paid dividends on shares of Spirit Common Stock in 2023. Spirit last paid its stockholders a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share on October 3, 2022. The terms of the Merger Agreement limit Spirit’s ability to declare or pay dividends prior to the completion of the Merger.

25

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This proxy statement/prospectus and the documents incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act, Section 21E of the Exchange Act, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, each as amended. Forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “cause,” “continue,” “could,” “depend,” “develop,” “estimates,” “expects,” “forecasts,” “goal,” “guidance,” “have,” “impact,” “implement,” “increase,” “intends,” “lead,” “maintain,” “may,” “might,” “plans,” “potential,” “possible,” “projects,” “reduce,” “remain,” “result,” “scheduled,” “seek,” “should,” “targets,” “will,” “would” and other similar words or expressions, or the negative thereof. The absence of such words or expressions does not necessarily mean the statements are not forward-looking. Forward-looking statements are not statements of historical fact and reflect Boeing’s and Spirit’s current views about future events. Forward-looking statements are based on expectations and assumptions that Boeing and/or Spirit believe to be reasonable when made, but that may not prove to be accurate. These statements are not guarantees and are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, uncertainties and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Many factors could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from these forward-looking statements.

These factors include, but are not limited to: the timely satisfaction of the conditions to the Closing; realizing the anticipated benefits of the Merger (including anticipated synergies and quality improvements) in the expected timeframe or at all; the successful integration of Spirit into Boeing’s business and operations; the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstance that could give rise to the right of Boeing or Spirit to terminate the Merger Agreement; the ability of Spirit to enter into definitive agreements with Airbus, and consummate the transactions contemplated by the Airbus Term Sheet, for the disposition of Spirit Airbus Business; reputational risk and potential adverse reactions of Boeing’s or Spirit’s customers, regulators, employees or business partners, including those resulting from the announcement or completion of the Merger; the possibility that the Merger may be more expensive to complete than anticipated, including as a result of unexpected factors or events; the diversion of management’s attention and time from ongoing business operations and opportunities on Merger-related matters; legal, regulatory, tax and economic developments affecting Boeing, Spirit and their respective businesses; the ability of Boeing and Spirit to obtain the Regulatory Approvals or to satisfy any of the other conditions to the Closing in a timely manner or at all; general conditions in the economy and Boeing’s industry, including those due to regulatory changes; Boeing’s reliance on its commercial airline customers; the overall health of Boeing’s aircraft production system, production quality issues, commercial airplane production rates, Boeing’s ability to successfully develop and certify new aircraft or new derivative aircraft, and the ability of Boeing’s aircraft to meet stringent performance and reliability standards; changing budget and appropriation levels and acquisition priorities of the U.S. government, as well as significant delays in U.S. government appropriations; Boeing’s dependence on subcontractors and suppliers, as well as the availability of highly skilled labor and raw materials; work stoppages or other labor disruptions; competition within Boeing’s markets; Boeing’s non-U.S. operations and sales to non-U.S. customers; changes in accounting estimates; realizing the anticipated benefits of other mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures/strategic alliances or divestitures; Boeing’s dependence on U.S. government contracts; Boeing’s reliance on fixed-price contracts; Boeing’s reliance on cost-type contracts; contracts that include in-orbit incentive payments; unauthorized access to Boeing’s, Boeing’s customers’ and/or Boeing’s suppliers’ information and systems; potential business disruptions, including threats to physical security or Boeing’s information technology systems, extreme weather (including effects of climate change) or other acts of nature, and pandemics or other public health crises; potential adverse developments in new or pending litigation and/or government inquiries or investigations; potential environmental liabilities; effects of climate change and legal, regulatory or market responses to such change; credit rating agency actions and changes in Boeing’s ability to obtain debt financing on

26

commercially reasonable terms, at competitive rates and in sufficient amounts; substantial pension and other postretirement benefit obligations; the adequacy of Boeing’s insurance coverage; and customer and aircraft concentration in Boeing’s customer financing portfolio.

Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from those stated or implied in forward-looking statements contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this proxy statement/prospectus due to a number of risks and uncertainties, including those risk factors described in the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 28 of this proxy statement/prospectus and in Boeing’s and Spirit’s most recently filed Annual Reports on Form 10-K, subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and other filings with the SEC incorporated herein by reference. Additional risks or uncertainties that are not currently known to Boeing or Spirit, that Boeing or Spirit currently deem to be immaterial, or that could apply to any company could also cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from those stated or implied in forward-looking statements. See the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 204 of this proxy statement/prospectus for more information about the SEC filings incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.

All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements concerning Boeing, Spirit, the Merger, the combined company or other matters attributable to Boeing or Spirit or any person acting on their behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statement above. Neither Boeing nor Spirit undertakes any obligation to publicly update any of the forward-looking statements contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this proxy statement/prospectus to reflect new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made.

27

RISK FACTORS

In deciding how to vote, you should carefully consider the following risk factors as well as the other information contained in, or and incorporated by reference into, this proxy statement/prospectus, including the matters addressed in the section entitled “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” References in this section to “Boeing,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to The Boeing Company.

Risks Related to the Merger

Because the market prices of Boeing Common Stock and Spirit Common Stock will fluctuate prior to the completion of the Merger, Spirit Stockholders cannot be sure of the market value of shares of Boeing Common Stock that they will receive in the Merger or the difference between the market value of shares of Boeing Common Stock that they will receive in the Merger and the market value of shares of Spirit Common Stock immediately prior to the Merger.

At the Effective Time, each share of Spirit Common Stock that is issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than Excluded Shares) will be automatically cancelled and cease to exist and will be converted into the right to receive a number of shares of Boeing Common Stock equal to (a) if the Boeing Stock Price, is greater than $149.00 but less than $206.94, the quotient obtained by dividing $37.25 by the Boeing Stock Price, rounded to four decimal places, or (b) if the Boeing Stock Price is greater than or equal to $206.94, 0.1800 or (c) if the Boeing Stock Price is equal to or less than $149.00, 0.2500. The respective market prices of both Boeing Common Stock and Spirit Common Stock have fluctuated since the date on which the Merger Agreement was signed and will continue to fluctuate. The market price of Boeing Common Stock, when received by Spirit Stockholders after the Merger is completed, could be greater than, less than or the same as the market price of Boeing Common Stock at the time of the Special Meeting. For that reason, the market price of Boeing Common Stock on the date of the Special Meeting may not be indicative of the value of the shares of Boeing Common Stock that Spirit Stockholders will receive upon completion of the Merger, and, at the time of the Special Meeting, Spirit Stockholders will not know, or be able to determine, the number of shares of Boeing Common Stock or the market value of such shares that they will receive in the Merger as compared to the market value of the Spirit Common Stock immediately prior to the Merger.

The market prices of Boeing Common Stock and Spirit Common Stock are subject to fluctuations due both to factors affecting market prices for publicly traded equity securities generally and to factors affecting Boeing Common Stock or Spirit Common Stock or Spirit Common Stock in particular. Market prices of Boeing Common Stock and Spirit Common Stock have been volatile at times in the past, and may be volatile in the future. Neither Boeing nor Spirit is permitted to terminate the Merger Agreement or re-solicit the vote of Spirit Stockholders solely because of changes in the market price of Boeing Common Stock or Spirit Common Stock. Stock price changes may result from a variety of factors, including:

28

The Merger is subject to conditions, including certain conditions that are beyond Boeing’s and Spirit’s control and may not be satisfied on a timely basis or at all. Failure to complete the Merger could have material adverse effects on Boeing and Spirit.

Completion of the Merger is subject to a number of conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement. Some of the conditions, such as adoption of the Merger Agreement by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Spirit Common Stock entitled to vote thereon and receipt of certain regulatory approvals, are beyond Boeing’s and Spirit’s control, resulting in uncertainty as to the timing of completion of the Merger and as to whether the Merger will be completed at all. The governmental authorities from which the regulatory approvals are required may impose conditions on the completion of the Merger, require changes to the terms of the Merger Agreement, prevent the completion of the Merger or make the completion of the Merger illegal. In addition, the Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for both Spirit and Boeing that, if exercised, will also result in the Merger not being completed.

As described under “—The Merger is subject to certain regulatory approvals that, if delayed, not granted or granted with burdensome or unacceptable conditions, could delay, impair or prevent completion of the Merger or result in additional costs or reduce the anticipated benefits of the Merger,” below, the completion of the Merger is subject to the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under the HSR Act and the receipt of other specified regulatory approvals. Regulatory review under the HSR Act and other applicable regulations may result in regulatory authorities imposing conditions on the granting of such approvals. Such conditions and the process of obtaining regulatory approvals could have the effect of delaying completion of the Merger or of imposing additional costs or limitations on the combined company following the completion of the Merger, and such conditions could result in a closing condition under the Merger Agreement not being satisfied. The regulatory approvals may not be received at all, may not be received in a timely fashion, or may contain conditions on the completion of the Merger that are unacceptable to Boeing.

Boeing and Spirit cannot assure you that the various conditions to the Closing will be satisfied or will not result in the abandonment or delay of the Merger. Any delay in completing the Merger could cause Boeing and Spirit not to realize, or to be delayed in realizing, some or all of the benefits that Boeing and Spirit expect to achieve if the Merger is completed within the time currently expected. See the section entitled “The Merger Agreement—Conditions to the Closing of the Merger” beginning on page 147 of this proxy statement/prospectus for more information.

If the Merger is not completed, Boeing’s and Spirit’s ongoing businesses could be adversely affected, and, without realizing any of the benefits of having completed the Merger, Boeing and Spirit would be subject to a number of risks, including:

29

The Merger is subject to certain regulatory approvals that, if delayed, not granted or granted with burdensome or unacceptable conditions, could delay, impair or prevent completion of the Merger or result in additional costs or reduce the anticipated benefits of the Merger.

The completion of the Merger is subject to the expiration or termination of all waiting periods (and any agreed upon extensions of any waiting period or commitment not to complete the Merger for any period of time) applicable to the completion of the Merger under the HSR Act and the receipt of certain additional regulatory approvals.

With respect to United States antitrust and competition laws, under the HSR Act, the Merger may not be completed until Notification and Report Forms have been filed with the FTC and the DOJ and the applicable waiting period (or any extension thereof) has expired or been terminated. A transaction requiring notification under the HSR Act may not be completed until the expiration of the applicable 30-day waiting period following the parties’ filing of their respective HSR Act notifications or the early termination of that waiting period, at the earliest. Each of Boeing and Spirit filed an HSR Notification and Report Form with the FTC and the DOJ on July 29, 2024. On August 28, 2024, prior to the expiration of the waiting period, the FTC issued a Request for Additional Information and Documentary Material (a “Second Request”) to Boeing and Spirit, which provides that the parties must observe an additional 30-day waiting period, which will begin to run only after both parties have complied with the Second Request, unless the waiting period is terminated earlier or the parties otherwise agree to extend the waiting period (or commit not to complete the Merger for a specified period of time).

At any time before or after completion of the Merger, notwithstanding the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under the HSR Act, the DOJ or the FTC could take such action under antitrust or competition laws as it deems necessary or desirable in the public interest, including seeking to enjoin the completion of the Merger, seeking divestiture of substantial assets of the parties or requiring the parties to license, or hold separate, assets or to terminate existing relationships and contractual rights. Under certain circumstances, private parties may also seek to take legal action against the Merger under antitrust or competition laws.

The Merger is also subject to clearance or approval by foreign investment authorities in France and the United Kingdom. In deciding whether to grant foreign investment approval, consent or clearance, foreign investment authorities generally will consider the effect of the transactions on national security or national interest within their jurisdictions, in particular with respect to sensitive sectors, critical infrastructure, critical technology, and access to personal identifiable information or sensitive personal data. The relevant foreign investment authorities could take such actions under the applicable foreign investment laws as they deem necessary or desirable, including seeking divestiture of substantial assets of the parties, requiring the parties to license or hold separate assets or terminate existing relationships and contractual rights or impose limitations or restrictions on, or prohibit, investments by certain investors (including, but not limited to, the imposition of limits on purchasing Boeing securities, limits on its ability to share information with certain investors, governance modifications, or forced divestiture, among other things).

Many jurisdictions have recently adopted, expanded, and/or are continuing to expand their foreign investment review regimes, and foreign investment authorities can have significant discretion

30

in the interpretation and enforcement of such regimes. If new or existing regimes are enacted or updated prior to the Closing, or a foreign investment authority determines that the parties have failed to make a mandatory notification, the parties may be required to make additional foreign investment filings and/or be subject to fines, penalties, divestiture, or other regulatory actions. In addition, other foreign investment authorities may take action under the laws of their jurisdictions, even where we do not believe we meet the thresholds for filing, which could require additional filings or review processes and which could include seeking to enjoin the completion of the Merger.

Any one of these requirements, limitations, costs, divestitures or restrictions imposed by antitrust or foreign investment authorities could jeopardize or delay the completion, or reduce the anticipated benefits, of the Merger. There is no assurance that Boeing and Spirit will obtain all required regulatory consents or approvals on a timely basis, or at all. Failure to obtain the necessary consents and approvals could substantially delay or prevent the completion of the Merger, which could negatively affect both Boeing and Spirit.

Spirit may not be able to complete the disposition of the Spirit Airbus Business.

Boeing’s obligation to complete the Merger is subject to, among other conditions, the Divestiture Condition, which requires that Spirit have completed the divestiture of the Spirit Airbus Business. Spirit and Airbus have entered into a binding term sheet under which they have agreed to negotiate in good faith definitive agreements (the “Definitive Agreements”), including a purchase agreement, providing for the acquisition by Airbus or its affiliates of the Spirit Airbus Business on the terms set forth in the term sheet with the goal of permitting Boeing and Spirit to complete the Merger prior to the Outside Date. Execution of the Definitive Agreements is subject to and conditioned upon, among other things, the completion to the satisfaction of Airbus of its due diligence. As a result, there can be no assurance that Spirit will be able to enter into the Definitive Agreements on the expected timeline, or at all. Further, even if Spirit is able to negotiate and enter into the Definitive Agreements, there can be no assurance that Spirit would satisfy the closing conditions in the Definitive Agreements, including receipt of regulatory approvals, or be able to complete the disposition of the Spirit Airbus Business as contemplated by the term sheet or the Definitive Agreements. If Spirit faces difficulty in completing the disposition of the Spirit Airbus Business, Spirit could be unable to satisfy the Divestiture Condition in a timely matter or at all.

The Merger Agreement limits Spirit’s abilities to pursue alternatives to the Merger and could discourage a potential competing acquiror or other strategic transaction partner from making a favorable alternative transaction proposal.

Under the Merger Agreement, Spirit is required, subject to certain exceptions with respect to unsolicited proposals and the Divestiture Assets, not to directly or indirectly solicit competing Acquisition Proposals or to enter into discussions concerning, or provide confidential information in connection with, any unsolicited alternative Acquisition Proposals. In addition, upon termination of the Merger Agreement under certain circumstances, Spirit may be required to pay Boeing a termination fee of $150 million. See the sections entitled “The Merger Agreement—No Solicitation of Acquisition Proposals; Change of Recommendation,” “The Merger Agreement—Termination of the Merger Agreement” and “The Merger Agreement—Termination Fees” beginning on pages 133, 149 and 151 of this proxy statement/prospectus, respectively. These provisions could discourage a potential acquirer or other strategic transaction partner that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant portion of Spirit from considering or pursuing an alternative transaction with Spirit or proposing such a transaction, even if the potential acquirer or other strategic transaction partner were prepared to pay consideration with a higher per share cash or market value than the per share market value proposed to be received or realized in the Merger. These provisions might also result in a potential acquirer or other strategic transaction partner proposing to pay a lower price than it might otherwise have

31

proposed to pay because of the added expense of the termination fee that may become payable by Spirit in certain circumstances. If the Merger Agreement were terminated, and Spirit were to seek another business combination, Spirit might not be able to negotiate or complete a transaction on terms comparable to or more attractive than the terms of the Merger Agreement.

The Merger, and uncertainty regarding the Merger, may adversely affect Boeing’s and Spirit’s relationships with customers, suppliers, strategic partners and others and could adversely affect each company’s ability to effectively manage its respective business.

The Merger will occur only if the Merger Agreement’s conditions to the Closing are satisfied or waived. Accordingly, there may be uncertainty regarding the completion of the Merger. This uncertainty and the prospect of the Merger itself may cause customers, suppliers, strategic partners and others that deal with Boeing or Spirit to delay or defer entering into contracts with Boeing or Spirit or making other decisions concerning Boeing or Spirit or to seek changes in or cancellation of existing business relationships with Boeing or Spirit. Delays or deferrals of contracts or other decisions or changes in or cancellations of existing agreements or relationships could in some individual cases or in the aggregate have an adverse impact on the respective businesses of Boeing and Spirit, regardless of whether the Merger is ultimately completed. See the section entitled “The Merger Agreement—Conduct of Business Pending the Merger” beginning on page 128 of this proxy statement/prospectus for more information regarding the restrictive covenants to which Boeing and Spirit are subject.

In addition, under the terms of the Merger Agreement, Spirit and its subsidiaries are subject to certain restrictions on the conduct of their business prior to the completion of the Merger, including being obligated to use their reasonable best efforts to conduct their business in all material respects in the ordinary course of business and being limited in their ability in certain cases to pursue certain business opportunities or acquire certain assets, which could delay or otherwise adversely affect Spirit’s and its subsidiaries’ ability to execute certain of their business strategies or limit their ability to respond to competitive or other developments that arise prior to the completion of the Merger and could negatively affect their business and operations.

Uncertainties associated with the Merger may result in a loss of management and other key personnel of Boeing or Spirit, which could adversely affect the future business and operations of the combined company following the Merger or the business of Boeing or Spirit should the Merger not be completed.

Boeing and Spirit are dependent on the experience and industry knowledge of their respective officers and other key management, technical and professional personnel to execute their business plans. The combined company’s success after the Merger will depend in part upon its ability to retain key management and other key personnel of Boeing and Spirit. Current and prospective employees of Boeing and Spirit may experience uncertainty about their roles within the combined company following the Merger or have other concerns regarding the timing and completion of the Merger or the operations of the combined company following the Merger, any of which may have an adverse effect on the ability of Boeing and Spirit to retain, attract or motivate key management and other key personnel. If Boeing and Spirit are unable to retain personnel, including key management, who are critical to the future operations of the companies, Boeing and Spirit could face disruptions in their operations, loss of customers, loss of key information, expertise or know-how and unanticipated additional recruitment and training costs. In addition, the loss of key personnel could diminish the anticipated benefits of the Merger or delay the completion of the Merger.

The Merger might be completed even if material adverse changes, such as industry-wide changes or other events, subsequent to the announcement of the Merger were to occur.

Although one of the conditions to the Closing is there not having occurred any Material Adverse Effect or Boeing Material Adverse Effect since the date of the Merger Agreement, some types of

32

changes would not constitute a basis for the parties to refuse to complete the Merger, even if such changes would have a material adverse effect on either of the parties. For example, a worsening of Spirit’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows due to general economic conditions would not give Boeing the right to refuse to complete the Merger. In such a case, Boeing’s business and financial position, results of operations and cash flows after the Merger might be negatively affected as a result of the Merger.

Boeing and Spirit are expected to incur significant transaction costs in connection with the Merger, which may be in excess of those anticipated by them.

Boeing and Spirit have incurred and are expected to continue to incur a number of non-recurring costs associated with negotiating and completing the Merger, combining the operations of the two companies and working to achieve desired synergies, including fees paid to financial, legal, accounting and other advisors, employee retention, severance and benefit costs, filing fees and, potentially, termination fees. These fees and costs have been, and will continue to be, substantial and, in many cases, will be borne by Boeing and Spirit whether or not the Merger is completed, and could have an adverse effect on Boeing’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows following the completion of the Merger. The elimination of duplicative costs, as well as the realization of other potential efficiencies related to the integration of Boeing’s and Spirit’s businesses, may not offset transaction-related costs and achieve a net benefit in the near term, or at all.

Spirit Stockholders will not be entitled to appraisal rights in the Merger.

Appraisal rights are statutory rights that, if applicable under law, enable stockholders of a corporation to dissent from an extraordinary transaction, such as a merger, and to demand that such corporation pay the fair value for their shares as determined by a court in a judicial proceeding instead of receiving the consideration offered to such stockholders in connection with the extraordinary transaction. Under the DGCL, stockholders generally do not have appraisal rights if the shares of stock they hold are either listed on a national securities exchange or held of record by more than 2,000 holders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, appraisal rights are available if stockholders are required by the terms of the Merger Agreement to accept for their shares anything other than (a) shares of stock of the surviving corporation, (b) shares of stock of another corporation that will either be listed on a national securities exchange or held of record by more than 2,000 holders, (c) cash in lieu of fractional shares or (d) any combination of the foregoing.

Because Boeing Common Stock and Spirit Common Stock are listed on the NYSE, a national securities exchange, and because Spirit Stockholders are not required by the terms of the Merger Agreement to accept for their shares of Spirit Common Stock anything other than shares of Boeing Common Stock and cash in lieu of fractional shares, holders of Spirit Common Stock are not entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the Merger. See the section entitled “No Appraisal Rights” beginning on page 199 of this proxy statement/prospectus for more information.

Completion of the Merger may trigger change in control or other provisions in certain agreements to which Spirit or any of its subsidiaries or joint ventures is a party.

The completion of the Merger may trigger change in control or other provisions in certain agreements to which Spirit or any of its subsidiaries or joint ventures is a party. If Spirit, its subsidiaries or its joint ventures, as applicable, are unable to negotiate modifications, consents or waivers of those provisions, following completion of the Merger, the counterparties may exercise their rights and remedies under such agreements, potentially terminate such agreements or seek monetary damages. Even if Spirit, its subsidiaries or its joint ventures, as applicable, are able to negotiate modifications, consents or waivers, the counterparties may require a fee for such modifications,

33

consents or waivers or seek to renegotiate such agreements on terms less favorable to Spirit or the applicable subsidiary or joint venture.

Boeing and Spirit may be a target of securities class action and derivative lawsuits, which could result in substantial costs and could delay or prevent the completion of the Merger.

Securities class action lawsuits and derivative lawsuits are often brought against public companies that have entered into acquisition or merger agreements. As of November 21, 2024, one lawsuit challenging the Merger was filed on behalf of a purported Spirit Stockholder, as described in the section entitled “The Merger—Litigation Relating to the Merger” beginning on page 116 of this proxy statement/prospectus. Even if such lawsuits are without merit, defending against, settling or otherwise resolving these claims can result in substantial costs, including costs associated with indemnification of directors and officers, and divert management time and resources. An adverse judgment in any such litigation could result in monetary damages, which could have a negative impact on Boeing’s and Spirit’s respective liquidity and financial condition. Additionally, if a plaintiff were successful in obtaining an injunction prohibiting completion of the Merger, that injunction could delay or prevent the Merger from being completed, which could adversely affect Boeing’s and Spirit’s businesses, financial position, results of operations and cash flows, as described above under “—The Merger is subject to conditions, including certain conditions that are beyond Boeing’s and Spirit’s control and may not be satisfied on a timely basis or at all. Failure to complete the Merger could have material adverse effects on Boeing and Spirit.”

Current Boeing Stockholders and current Spirit Stockholders will have a reduced share of ownership in the combined company.

If the Boeing Stock Price were equal to the closing price of Boeing Common Stock on the NYSE on December 19, 2024, the last trading day before the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, each share of Spirit Common Stock would be converted into 0.2104 shares of Boeing Common Stock. At this Exchange Ratio, it is estimated that, immediately after completion of the Merger, Boeing Stockholders as of immediately prior to the Merger would hold approximately 96.7% and Spirit Stockholders as of immediately prior to the Merger (disregarding any shares of Boeing Common Stock held by Spirit Stockholders immediately prior to the Merger) would hold approximately 3.3% of the outstanding shares of Boeing Common Stock, each on a fully diluted basis. As a result, Boeing Stockholders and Spirit Stockholders will have a reduced share of ownership and voting interests, resulting in less influence on the policies of the combined company than they currently have on the policies of Boeing and Spirit, respectively. In addition, Boeing may from time to time engage in issuances of equity or equity-linked securities, which would result in additional dilution.

The exact equity stake of Spirit Stockholders in Boeing immediately following the completion of the Merger will depend on the number of shares of Boeing Common Stock and shares of Spirit Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time. The issuance of these new shares could have the effect of depressing the market price of Boeing Common Stock, through dilution of earnings per share or otherwise. Any dilution of, or delay of any accretion to, Boeing’s earnings per share could cause the price of Boeing Common Stock to decline or to increase at a reduced rate.

Spirit’s directors and executive officers have interests in the Merger that may be different from, or in addition to, the interests of Spirit Stockholders generally.

In considering the recommendation of the Spirit Board that Spirit Stockholders vote in favor of the Merger Agreement Proposal, the Advisory Compensation Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal, Spirit Stockholders should be aware of the fact that, aside from their interests as Spirit Stockholders, certain Spirit directors and executive officers have interests in the Merger that may be different from, or in addition to, the interests of Spirit Stockholders generally. These interests include:

34

See the section entitled “The Merger—Interests of Certain Spirit Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger” beginning on page 98 of this proxy statement/prospectus for a more detailed description of the interests of Spirit’s directors and executive officers. The Spirit Board was aware of and considered these potential interests, among other matters, in evaluating and negotiating the Merger Agreement, the Merger and the other Merger Agreement Transactions, in approving the Merger and in recommending that Spirit Stockholders approve the Merger Agreement Proposal.

Boeing and Spirit may waive one or more of the conditions to the Closing without resoliciting stockholder approval of the Merger Agreement Proposal and may terminate the Merger Agreement even if it has been adopted by Spirit Stockholders.

Certain conditions to the Closing may be waived, in whole or in part, to the extent permitted by applicable law, by agreement of Boeing and Spirit if the condition is a condition to both parties’ obligation to complete the Merger or by the party for which such condition is a condition of its obligation to complete the Merger. If either party determines to waive any of the conditions to the Closing, such decision may have an adverse effect on Boeing, Spirit and/or their respective stockholders. For example, if Boeing waives the condition regarding the accuracy (subject to materiality qualifiers in certain cases) of the representations and warranties of Spirit contained in the Merger Agreement or the condition regarding the absence of a Material Adverse Effect, or if Spirit waives the condition regarding the accuracy (subject to materiality qualifiers in certain cases) of the representations and warranties of Boeing and Merger Sub contained in the Merger Agreement or the condition regarding the absence of a Boeing Material Adverse Effect, then the value of the Merger Consideration Shares could be materially diminished.

In addition, Boeing and Spirit can agree to terminate the Merger Agreement even if Spirit Stockholders have already voted to adopt the Merger Agreement.

35

Risks Related to Boeing After Completion of the Merger

The market price for Boeing Common Stock following the Closing may be affected by factors different from those that historically have affected or currently affect Boeing Common Stock and Spirit Common Stock.

Following the Merger, Boeing Stockholders and former Spirit Stockholders will own interests in a combined company operating an expanded business with more assets and a different mix of liabilities. Boeing’s financial position after the Merger may differ from its financial position before the Merger, and the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the combined company may be affected by factors that are different from those currently or historically affecting the results of operations of Boeing and those currently or historically affecting the results of operations of Spirit. Accordingly, the market price and performance of Boeing Common Stock is likely to be different from the performance of Boeing Common Stock or Spirit Common Stock in the absence of the Merger, which may adversely affect the value of a Spirit Stockholder’s investment following completion of the Merger, regardless of the combined company’s actual operating performance.

Following completion of the Merger, the market price of Boeing Common Stock may be volatile, and holders of Boeing Common Stock could lose a significant portion of their investment due to drops in the market price of Boeing Common Stock following completion of the Merger.

Following the Merger, the market price of Boeing Common Stock may be volatile, and stockholders may not be able to resell their shares of Boeing Common Stock at or above the price at which they acquired their shares pursuant to the Merger Agreement or otherwise due to fluctuations in its market price, including changes in price caused by factors unrelated to Boeing’s performance or prospects.

Specific factors that may have a significant effect on the market price of Boeing Common Stock include:

36

Also, Boeing Stockholders and Spirit Stockholders may not wish to continue to invest in the combined company or may wish to reduce their investment in the combined company, including in order to comply with institutional investing guidelines, to increase diversification, to track any rebalancing of stock indices in which Boeing Common Stock is included, to respond to the risk profile of the combined company or to realize a gain. If large amounts of Boeing Common Stock are sold, the price of Boeing Common Stock could decline.

If the Merger is completed, Boeing may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the Merger, including anticipated synergies.

There can be no assurance that Boeing will be able to successfully integrate Spirit, and the anticipated benefits of the Merger, including the anticipated operational and other synergies between the companies, may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer to realize than expected or may have unanticipated adverse results. Anticipated benefits are based on expectations about the future that are subject to change (such as assumptions about Boeing’s future production and manufacturing activity, service costs, future operational plans which have not yet been developed and which may vary from past experiences operating the same assets or recent experiences operating in the same areas). If Boeing is not able to realize the anticipated benefits expected from the Merger within the anticipated timing or at all, Boeing’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows may be adversely affected, Boeing’s earnings per share may be diluted, the accretive effect of the Merger may decrease or be delayed and the market price of Boeing Common Stock may be negatively impacted.

The integration of the two companies will require significant time and focus from management following the Merger and could result in performance shortfalls as a result of the diversion of management’s attention to such integration efforts. Difficulties in integrating Spirit into Boeing may result in the combined company performing differently than expected, in operational challenges or in the failure to realize anticipated benefits, including anticipated operational and other synergies between the two companies, in whole or in part, on the anticipated timeline or at all. Potential difficulties that may be encountered in the integration process include:

In addition, Boeing’s business may be negatively impacted following the Merger if it is unable to effectively manage the expanded operations of the combined company. Actual growth and any potential cost savings, if achieved, may be lower than what Boeing and Spirit expect and may take longer to achieve than anticipated. If Boeing and Spirit are not able to adequately address integration challenges, they may be unable to successfully integrate their operations or realize the anticipated benefits of the integration of the two companies.

Boeing and Spirit, including their respective subsidiaries, have operated and, until the completion of the Merger, will continue to operate independently. It is possible that the pendency of the Merger, as well as the integration process, could result in the loss of key personnel, the loss of customers, inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies, unexpected integration issues, higher than expected integration costs, an overall post-completion integration process that takes longer than originally anticipated, as well as the disruption of each company’s ongoing businesses. Any or all of those occurrences could adversely affect the combined company’s operations, including the ability to

37

maintain relationships with customers and employees prior to, or after, the Merger or to achieve the anticipated benefits of the Merger.

The combined company may not be able to retain Boeing and Spirit’s existing customers, which could have an adverse effect on the combined company’s business and operations, and third parties may terminate or alter existing contracts or relationships with Boeing or Spirit.

As a result of the Merger, the combined company may experience impacts on relationships with customers that may harm the combined company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Certain customers may seek to terminate or modify contractual obligations following the Merger, whether or not contractual rights are triggered as a result of the Merger. There can be no guarantee that customers will remain with or continue to have a relationship with the combined company or do so on the same or similar contractual terms following the Merger. If any customers seek to terminate or modify contractual obligations or discontinue the relationship with the combined company, then the combined company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows may be harmed.

Boeing and Spirit also have contracts with landlords, licensors and other business partners which may require Boeing or Spirit, as applicable, to obtain consent from these other parties in connection with the Merger, or which may otherwise contain limitations applicable to such contracts following the Merger. If these consents cannot be obtained, the combined company may suffer a loss of potential future revenue, incur costs and lose rights that may be material to the combined company’s business. In addition, third parties with whom Boeing or Spirit currently have relationships may terminate or otherwise reduce the scope of their relationship with either party in anticipation of the Merger. Any such disruptions could limit the combined company’s ability to achieve the anticipated benefits of the Merger. The adverse effect of any such disruptions could also be exacerbated by a delay in the completion of the Merger or by a termination of the Merger Agreement.

The combined company may be exposed to increased litigation, which could have an adverse effect on the combined company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

The combined company may be exposed to increased litigation from stockholders, customers, suppliers, distributors and other third parties due to the combination of Boeing’s and Spirit’s businesses following the Merger. Such litigation may have an adverse impact on the combined company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows, or may cause disruptions to the combined company’s operations.

If the Merger does not qualify as “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, Spirit Stockholders may be required to pay substantial U.S. federal income taxes.

It is possible that, because it is structured as a transaction involving Spirit Stockholders’ receipt of consideration solely in the form of Boeing Common Stock (other than cash received in lieu of fractional shares of Boeing Common Stock), the Merger may qualify as a “reorganization” under the Code. There are significant legal and factual doubts concerning the qualification of the Merger as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code. However, the completion of the Merger is not conditioned on a ruling from the IRS or the receipt of an opinion of counsel to the effect that the Merger will qualify as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code, and neither Boeing nor Spirit or any of their respective advisors or affiliates makes any representations or provides any assurances in the Merger Agreement regarding the tax consequences of the Merger, including whether the Merger qualifies as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code. Accordingly, and

38

for the reasons discussed below, no assurance can be given that the IRS will not challenge the qualification of the Merger as a “reorganization” or that a court would not sustain such a challenge.

Although, as we discuss in further detail in the section entitled “U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger—IRS Private Letter Ruling” beginning on page 111 of this proxy statement/prospectus, Boeing and Spirit filed with the IRS on December 20, 2024 the Ruling Request to request a private letter ruling to the effect that the Merger qualifies as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code, there are no assurances that Boeing and Spirit will receive such a ruling prior to the Special Meeting or the Effective Time or at all. Accordingly, unless Boeing and Spirit receive a private letter ruling from the IRS that the Merger qualifies as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code, Spirit Stockholders that are U.S. Holders (as defined in the section entitled “The Merger—U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger” beginning on page 109 of this proxy statement/prospectus)) should assume that the Merger will not qualify as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code and that the Merger will be treated as a taxable transaction.

Moreover, the Merger Agreement does not include any agreement, statement or representation regarding the qualification of the Merger as such. Further, the Merger Agreement does not contain agreements by Boeing, Spirit, or Merger Sub to use efforts to cause the Merger to qualify as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code, nor does the Merger Agreement require such parties to refrain from taking any actions that would cause the Merger to fail to or cease to qualify as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code.

Consequently, there is significant uncertainty as to the treatment of the Merger for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and there is no representation made as to whether Boeing and Spirit will ultimately report the Merger as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code.

If the Merger does not qualify as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code, then the receipt of Boeing Common Stock (and cash in lieu of a fractional share of Boeing Common Stock) in exchange for Spirit Common Stock in the Merger will be a taxable transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In such case, a U.S. Holder (as defined in the section entitled “The Merger—U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger” beginning on page 109 of this proxy statement/prospectus)) of Spirit Common Stock generally would recognize taxable gain or loss upon the exchange of Boeing Common Stock for Spirit Common Stock (and cash in lieu of a fractional share of Boeing Common Stock) pursuant to the Merger. See the section entitled “U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger” beginning on page 109 of this proxy statement/prospectus.

The financial forecasts are based on various assumptions that may not be realized.

The unaudited prospective financial information set forth in the forecasts included under the section entitled “The Merger—Spirit Unaudited Forecasted Financial Information” beginning on page 85 of this proxy statement/prospectus was prepared solely for internal use and is subjective in many respects. Spirit’s prospective financial information was based solely upon assumptions of, and information available to, Spirit’s management when prepared. These estimates and assumptions are subject to uncertainties, many of which are beyond Spirit’s control and may not be realized. Many factors mentioned in this proxy statement/prospectus, including the risks outlined in this “Risk Factors” section and the events or circumstances described in the section entitled “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” beginning on page 26 of this proxy statement/prospectus will be important in determining the combined company’s future results. As a result of these contingencies, actual future results may vary materially from Boeing’s and Spirit’s estimates. In view of these uncertainties, the inclusion of prospective financial information in this proxy statement/prospectus is not and should not be viewed as a representation that the forecasted results will necessarily reflect actual future results.

39

The unaudited prospective financial information set forth in the forecasts included under the section entitled “The Merger—Spirit Unaudited Forecasted Financial Information” beginning on page 85 of this proxy statement/prospectus was not prepared with a view toward compliance with published guidelines of the SEC or the guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants for preparation or presentation of prospective financial information. Further, any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made, and neither Boeing nor Spirit undertakes any obligation, other than as required by applicable law, to update, correct or otherwise revise the unaudited prospective financial information included in this proxy statement/prospectus to reflect events or circumstances after the date such prospective financial information was prepared or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances, even in the event that any or all of the assumptions underlying any such prospective financial information are no longer appropriate (even in the short term).

The unaudited prospective financial information of Spirit included in this proxy statement/prospectus has been prepared by, and is the responsibility of, the management of Spirit. Ernst & Young LLP has not audited, reviewed, examined, compiled or applied agreed-upon procedures with respect to the accompanying unaudited prospective financial information, and accordingly, Ernst & Young LLP does not express an opinion or any other form of assurance with respect thereto. The reports of Ernst & Young LLP with respect to Spirit incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/prospectus relate to the previously issued financial statements of Spirit. These reports do not extend to Spirit’s unaudited prospective financial information and should not be read to do so. Neither Boeing’s independent auditors, nor any other independent accountants, have compiled, examined, or performed any procedures with respect to the prospective financial information contained herein, nor have they expressed any opinion or any other form of assurance on such information or its achievability, and assume no responsibility for, and disclaim any association with, the prospective financial information. See the section entitled “The Merger—Spirit Unaudited Forecasted Financial Information” beginning on page 85 of this proxy statement/prospectus for more information.

The opinion of Spirit’s financial advisor will not reflect changes in circumstances between the signing of the Merger Agreement and the completion of the Merger.

Spirit has received an opinion from its financial advisor, Moelis, in connection with the signing of the Merger Agreement, but has not obtained any updated opinion from its financial advisor as of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus. Changes in the operations and prospects of Spirit, general market and economic conditions and other factors that may be beyond the control of Boeing or Spirit and on which Spirit’s financial advisor’s opinion was based, may significantly alter the value of Spirit or the prices of the shares of Spirit Common Stock by the time the Merger is completed. The opinion does not speak as of the time the Merger will be completed or as of any date other than the date of such opinion. Because Spirit currently does not anticipate asking its financial advisor to update its opinion, the opinion will not address the fairness of the number of shares of Boeing Common Stock that will be received by holders of Spirit Common Stock from a financial point of view at the time the Merger is completed. The Spirit Board’s recommendation that Spirit Stockholders vote in favor of the Merger Agreement Proposal, the Advisory Compensation Proposal and Adjournment Proposal, however, are made as of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus.

After the Merger is completed, Spirit Stockholders will have their rights as stockholders governed by Boeing’s organizational documents.

Upon completion of the Merger, Spirit Stockholders will no longer be stockholders to Spirit, but will instead become Boeing Stockholders. Former Spirit Stockholders will instead have rights as Boeing Stockholders that differ from the rights they had as Spirit Stockholders before the Merger. For a detailed comparison of the rights of Boeing Stockholders to the rights of Spirit Stockholders, see the section entitled “Comparison of Stockholder Rights” beginning on page 188 of this proxy statement/prospectus.

40

Risks Related to Boeing’s Business and Operations

Some of our and our suppliers’ workforces are represented by labor unions. Work stoppages by our employees have adversely affected and could continue to adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and/or cash flows. Future work stoppages by our or our suppliers’ employees could also adversely impact our business.

Approximately 57,000 employees, which constitute 33% of our total workforce, were union represented as of December 31, 2023 under collective bargaining agreements with varying durations and expiration dates. On September 12, 2024, our contract with IAM 751, which represents over 30,000 Boeing manufacturing employees primarily located in Washington state, expired and 96% of IAM 751 members voted to initiate a strike. On November 4, 2024, members of IAM 751 voted to ratify a new contract, thereby ending the strike. As a result of the strike, production of our commercial aircraft, other than the 787 production in Charleston, and certain of our Defense, Space & Security products halted, adversely impacting our business and financial position. The new contract with IAM 751 and pay enhancements for certain non-union employees is adversely impacting our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. We expect further significant negative operating cash flows in the fourth quarter of 2024 and in future quarters as we work to resume and ramp up production and deliveries. The work stoppage also had, and may continue to have, negative impacts on our key suppliers and customers. Furthermore, the actions we took to help preserve our financial condition, including workforce reductions, furloughs, hiring freezes and pausing the issuance of certain supplier purchase orders, could negatively impact our ability to achieve our strategic objectives. We may experience additional work stoppages in the future, which could adversely affect our business.

We currently have in the U.S. 9 unions with 27 independent agreements and internationally 17 employee representative bodies, and we cannot predict how stable our union relationships will be or whether we will be able to meet the unions’ requirements. The unions may also limit our flexibility in managing our workforce and operations. Union actions at suppliers can also affect us. Work stoppages and instability in our union relationships could delay the production and/or development of our products, which could strain relationships with customers and result in lower revenues.

Other Risk Factors Related to Boeing and Spirit

Boeing’s and Spirit’s businesses are and will be subject to the risks described above, as applicable. Boeing is, and will continue to be, subject to the risks described above and in Boeing’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended June 30, 2024 and September 30, 2024, as updated by subsequent Current Reports on Form 8-K, all of which are filed with the SEC and incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus. In addition, Spirit is, and will continue to be, subject to the risks described above and in Spirit’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, as updated by subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, all of which are filed with the SEC and incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus. See the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 204 of this proxy statement/prospectus for the location of information incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.

41

THE SPECIAL MEETING

Date, Time and Place of the Special Meeting

The Special Meeting will be held in a virtual-only format conducted via live audio webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SPR2025SM, on January 31, 2025, at 11:30 a.m. Central Time. There will be no physical location for the Special Meeting.

Attending the Special Meeting

You will be able to attend the Special Meeting by visiting the Special Meeting website at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SPR2025SM and entering a 16-digit control number. If you hold your shares of Spirit Common Stock as a stockholder of record, your 16-digit control number will be printed on your proxy card. If instead you hold your shares of Spirit Common Stock through an account with a bank, broker or other nominee (that is, if you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name”), your bank, broker or other nominee may provide you with your 16-digit control number on the voting instruction form it furnishes to you; otherwise, you should contact your bank, broker or other nominee (preferably at least five business days before the date of the Special Meeting) to obtain a legal proxy that will permit you to attend, and vote at, the Special Meeting. If you join the Special Meeting by using your 16-digit control number or obtaining a legal proxy and logging in to the Special Meeting website, you will be able to attend and participate in the Special Meeting, submit your questions during the Special Meeting, and vote your shares online during the Special meeting.

Spirit Stockholders are encouraged to access the Special Meeting before the start time of 11:30 a.m. Central Time. Please allow ample time for online check-in, which will begin at 11:15 a.m. Central Time. If you encounter technical difficulties at the check-in for the Special Meeting or during the Special Meeting, please call the technical support telephone number that will be posted at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SPR2025SM. Technicians will be available to assist you.

Spirit Stockholders who participate in the Special Meeting via the Special Meeting website will be considered to have attended the Special Meeting and to have been present at the Special Meeting “in person,” including for purposes of determining a quorum and counting votes.

Purpose of the Special Meeting

At the special meeting, Spirit Stockholders will be asked to consider and vote on (1) the Merger Agreement Proposal, (2) the Advisory Compensation Proposal and (3) the Adjournment Proposal.

The approval of the Merger Agreement Proposal is a condition to the Closing under the Merger Agreement. If Spirit Stockholders fail to approve the Merger Agreement Proposal, the Merger will not occur. A copy of the Merger Agreement is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement/prospectus, and you are encouraged to read the Merger Agreement carefully and in its entirety. For a detailed discussion of the conditions to the Closing under the Merger Agreement, see the section entitled “The Merger Agreement—Conditions to the Closing of the Merger” beginning on page 147 of this proxy statement/prospectus.

Recommendation of the Spirit Board

The Spirit Board has unanimously (a) approved and declared advisable the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, (b) determined that the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby are in the best interests of Spirit and its stockholders, (c) resolved to recommend adoption of the Merger Agreement by the stockholders entitled to vote thereon and

42

(d) directed that the Merger Agreement be submitted to stockholders of Spirit for adoption at a meeting of stockholders of Spirit to be held to consider the adoption of the Merger Agreement. Accordingly, the Spirit Board unanimously recommends that the Spirit Stockholders vote (i) “FOR” the Merger Agreement Proposal, (ii) “FOR” the Advisory Compensation Proposal and (iii) “FOR” the Adjournment Proposal.

For additional information on the recommendation of the Spirit Board, see the section entitled “The Merger—Recommendation of the Spirit Board and Its Reasons for the Merger” beginning on page 80 of this proxy statement/prospectus.

Record Date, Outstanding Shares, Stockholders Entitled to Vote and Voting Rights

Only Spirit Stockholders who held shares of Spirit Common Stock of record on the Record Date, which is the close of business on December 20, 2024, are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote the shares of Spirit Common Stock they held on the Record Date at, the Special Meeting. As of the Record Date, 117,266,121 shares of Spirit Common Stock were outstanding and entitled to be voted at the Special Meeting. Each outstanding share of Spirit Common Stock entitles its holder of record to one vote on each matter considered at the Special Meeting.

Spirit Stockholders whose shares are registered directly in their name with Spirit’s transfer agent, Computershare, Inc., are considered the stockholder of record of those shares. The proxy materials for the Special Meeting will be sent directly to these Spirit Stockholders by Spirit. Spirit Stockholders whose shares are held through a bank, broker or other nominee are considered the beneficial owner of the shares of Spirit Common Stock held in “street name.” In that case, the proxy materials for the Special Meeting have been forwarded to the stockholders by the stockholders’ bank, broker or other nominee that is considered, with respect to those shares, to be the stockholder of record. As the beneficial owner, stockholders have the right to direct their bank, broker or other nominee how to vote their shares by following their instructions for voting, and they are also invited to attend the Special Meeting. See “—Attending the Special Meeting” above and “—How to Vote” below.

Voting by Spirit’s Directors and Executive Officers

As of the Record Date, Spirit’s directors and executive officers and their affiliates beneficially owned and were entitled to vote, in the aggregate, 656,565 shares of Spirit Common Stock, representing approximately 0.6% of the shares of Spirit Common Stock outstanding as of the Record Date. Spirit currently expects its directors and executive officers to vote their shares of Spirit Common Stock in favor of the Merger Agreement Proposal, the Advisory Compensation Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal, although none of the directors and executive officers is obligated to do so.

Quorum, Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes

For business to be conducted at the Special Meeting, a quorum must be present. The presence, in person or by proxy, of Spirit Stockholders entitled to cast at least a majority of the votes which all Spirit Stockholders are entitled to vote upon a matter at the Special Meeting constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business on such matter at the Special Meeting.

As of the Record Date, 117,266,121 shares of Spirit Common Stock were outstanding and entitled to be voted at the Special Meeting; accordingly, the presence, in person or by proxy, at the Special Meeting of at least 58,633,061 shares of Spirit Common Stock entitled to vote at the Special Meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum.

Shares for which a Spirit Stockholder directs an “abstention” from voting will be counted for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum for the transaction of business at the Special

43

Meeting. An abstention will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Merger Agreement Proposal.

Banks, brokers and other nominees that hold shares in “street name” for a beneficial owner of those shares typically have the authority to vote in their discretion on “routine” proposals when they have not received instructions from beneficial owners. However, banks, brokers and other nominees that hold shares in street name for a beneficial owner of those shares are not allowed to exercise voting discretion with respect to the approval of matters that are “non-routine” without specific instructions from the beneficial owner. “Broker non-votes” occur when shares held in street name are present at a stockholder meeting at which at least one item of business is a routine proposal, but the bank, broker or other nominee is not instructed by the beneficial owner of those shares to vote on a particular proposal for which the bank, broker or other nominee does not have discretionary voting power. Under applicable rules, each of the proposals to be voted on at the Special Meeting will be “non-routine,” and therefore, it is expected that there will be no broker non-votes at the Special Meeting. Accordingly, if you are a Spirit Stockholder that beneficially owns shares of Spirit Common Stock held in street name, and you do not instruct your bank, broker or other nominee on how to vote your shares, your bank, broker or other nominee may not vote your shares on the Merger Agreement Proposal, the Advisory Compensation Proposal or the Adjournment Proposal, and your shares will not be considered present and entitled to vote at the Special Meeting for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present at the Special Meeting. A broker non-vote, if any, will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Merger Agreement Proposal.

Vote Required

Proposal 1: Approval of the Merger Agreement Proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Spirit Common Stock entitled to vote thereon. You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” on the Merger Agreement Proposal. A failure to vote, an abstention or a broker non-vote, if any, will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Merger Agreement Proposal.

Proposal 2: Approval of the Advisory Compensation Proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast affirmatively and negatively on the Advisory Compensation Proposal, assuming a quorum is present. You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” on the Advisory Compensation Proposal. A failure to vote, an abstention or a broker non-vote, if any, will have no effect on the Advisory Compensation Proposal, assuming a quorum is present.

Proposal 3: Approval of the Adjournment Proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast affirmatively and negatively on the Adjournment Proposal, assuming a quorum is present. You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” on the Adjournment Proposal. A failure to vote, an abstention or a broker non-vote, if any, will have no effect on the Adjournment Proposal, assuming a quorum is present.

The approval of the Merger Agreement Proposal is a condition to the Closing under the Merger Agreement. If Spirit Stockholders fail to approve the Merger Agreement Proposal, the Merger will not occur.

Approval of the Advisory Compensation Proposal and approval of the Adjournment Proposal are not conditions to the Closing. The vote on each proposal is a vote separate and apart from the other proposals. Accordingly, Spirit Stockholders may vote in favor of one or more of the proposals and vote not to approve the other proposal(s). Because the vote on the Advisory Compensation Proposal is advisory only, it will not be binding on either Spirit or Boeing. Accordingly, if the Merger Agreement Proposal is approved and the Merger is completed, the Merger-related compensation will be payable

44

to Spirit’s named executive officers, subject only to the conditions applicable thereto, regardless of the outcome of the approval of the Advisory Compensation Proposal.

How to Vote

Spirit Stockholders of Record

Spirit Stockholders of record may vote their shares (i) by proxy via the Internet, (ii) by proxy over the telephone, (iii) by proxy using a proxy card or (iv) at the Special Meeting via the Special Meeting website as follows:

Whether or not you plan to attend the Special Meeting via the Special Meeting website, please vote by proxy to ensure your vote is counted. You may still attend the Special Meeting and vote at the Special Meeting via the Special Meeting website, even if you have already voted by proxy. Any vote you cast at the Special Meeting via the Special Meeting website will supersede any previous votes that you may have submitted.

If Spirit Stockholders have timely and properly submitted their proxy, clearly indicated their vote and have not revoked their proxy, then their Spirit Common Stock will be voted as indicated. If Spirit Stockholders have timely and properly submitted their proxy but have not clearly indicated their vote, then their Spirit Common Stock will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Spirit Board. The Spirit Board recommends that holders of Spirit Common Stock vote (i) “FOR” the Merger Agreement Proposal, (ii) “FOR” the Advisory Compensation Proposal and (iii) “FOR” the Adjournment Proposal.

Beneficial Owners of Spirit Common Stock Held in “Street Name”

If your shares of Spirit Common Stock are held in “street name” in a stock brokerage account or by a bank, broker or other nominee, you should receive a voting instruction form from your bank, broker or other nominee seeking instruction from you as to how your shares should be voted. Spirit Stockholders may not vote Spirit Common Stock held in “street name” by returning a proxy card directly to Spirit. To vote at the Special Meeting, attend the Special Meeting and vote via the Special Meeting website. See “—Attending the Special Meeting” above.

45

Revocation of Proxies and Changes to a Spirit Stockholder’s Vote

If you are a Spirit Stockholder of record who has given a proxy, you may revoke your proxy prior to its exercise at the Special Meeting by:

If you are a beneficial owner of Spirit Common Stock held through a bank, broker or other nominee, you must follow the specific instructions provided to you by your bank, broker or other nominee to change or revoke any instructions you have already given to your bank, broker or other nominee. You may also change your vote by attending the Special Meeting and voting via the Special Meeting website during the Special Meeting. See “—Attending the Special Meeting” above.

It is important that you vote your shares of Spirit Common Stock promptly. Whether or not you plan to attend the Special Meeting, (i) if you are a Spirit Stockholder of record, please follow the instructions on the proxy card to vote by Internet or telephone as promptly as possible, or promptly complete, date, sign and return the enclosed proxy card in the postage-prepaid envelope, or (ii) if you are a beneficial owner of Spirit Common Stock held through a bank, broker or other nominee, please follow the voting instructions provided by such bank, broker or other nominee.

Inspector of Election

Spirit has appointed Broadridge to serve as inspector of election for the Special Meeting. Broadridge will independently tabulate affirmative and negative votes and abstentions.

Solicitation of Proxies

Spirit and the Spirit Board are soliciting Spirit Stockholders’ proxies in connection with the Special Meeting, and Spirit will bear the cost of soliciting such proxies. Proxies in connection with the Special Meeting may be solicited by officers, directors and regular supervisory and executive employees of Spirit, none of whom will receive any additional compensation for such solicitation. Spirit has retained Innisfree as proxy solicitor to assist with the solicitation of proxies in connection with the Special Meeting, for which Spirit estimates it will pay Innisfree a fee of $62,500 plus reasonable out-of-pocket costs and expenses. Proxies in connection with the Special Meeting may be solicited in person, by mail, by telephone, by facsimile, by messenger, via the Internet or by other means of communication, including electronic communication. Spirit will supply banks, brokers and other nominees that hold shares of Spirit Common Stock of record for beneficial owners with copies of proxy soliciting material in connection with the Special Meeting to be sent to such beneficial owners, in which case these parties will be reimbursed by Spirit for their reasonable expenses for completing the sending of such material to beneficial owners.

Adjournment

Although it is not currently expected, and subject to the restrictions in the Merger Agreement described in the following paragraph, the Special Meeting may be adjourned on one or more

46

occasions for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the Merger Agreement Proposal, if necessary to ensure that any legally required supplement or amendment to this proxy statement/prospectus is provided to and reviewed by the Spirit Stockholders in advance of the Special Meeting, if required by a court or if a quorum is not present at the Special Meeting. The adjourned meeting may take place without further notice other than by an announcement made at the Special Meeting, unless the adjournment is for more than 30 days or, after the adjournment, the Spirit Board fixes a new record date for determining the Spirit Stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting.

Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Special Meeting may not be postponed or adjourned by Spirit without Boeing’s prior written consent, except that Spirit may, without Boeing’s prior consent and after giving written notice to Boeing, postpone or adjourn the Special Meeting by no more than 15 business days beyond the originally scheduled date (i) to the extent the Spirit Board determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel, that such action is (x) required by applicable law or (y) reasonably necessary to ensure that any required supplement or amendment to this proxy statement/prospectus is disseminated to Spirit Stockholders for the amount of time required by applicable law in advance of the Special Meeting, or (ii) to the extent Spirit has not received proxies representing a sufficient number of shares of Spirit Common Stock to obtain approval of the Merger Agreement Proposal, whether or not a quorum is present, or (iii) to the extent reasonably necessary to obtain a quorum to conduct the business of the Special Meeting or to obtain Spirit Stockholder approval of the Merger Agreement Proposal.

Spirit Stockholders may be asked to vote to approve the Adjournment Proposal if there are not sufficient votes cast at the Special Meeting to approve the Merger Agreement Proposal. Regardless of the results of voting for the Adjournment Proposal, Spirit’s bylaws provide that any meeting of stockholders may be adjourned or recessed from time to time for any reason, whether or not a quorum is present, by the Spirit Board, the Chair of the Spirit Board or the presiding officer of the meeting.

Any adjournment of the Special Meeting for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies would allow Spirit Stockholders who have already submitted their proxies to revoke them at any time prior to their use at the Special Meeting, as adjourned.

Unless the Merger Agreement has been terminated in accordance with its terms, Spirit must hold the Special Meeting and submit the Merger Agreement to the Spirit Stockholders for a vote on the adoption thereof.

Questions and Additional Information

You should carefully read the entire proxy statement/prospectus, including its annexes and information incorporated by reference. You may also wish to consult your legal, tax and/or financial advisors with respect to any aspect of the Merger, the Merger Agreement or other matters discussed in this proxy statement/prospectus.

If you have questions about the matters to be voted on at the Special Meeting, would like additional copies of this proxy statement/prospectus or need help voting your shares of Spirit Common Stock, please contact Spirit’s proxy solicitor:

Innisfree M&A Incorporated

501 Madison Ave., 20^th Floor

New York, New York 10022

Stockholders, please call toll-free: (877) 456-3513

Banks and Brokerage Firms, please call: (212) 750-5833

47

PROPOSAL 1 – THE MERGER AGREEMENT PROPOSAL

This proxy statement/prospectus is being furnished to Spirit Stockholders as part of the solicitation of proxies by the Spirit Board for use at the Special Meeting to consider and vote on the Merger Agreement Proposal, which is a proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement. For a detailed discussion of the terms of the Merger Agreement, a copy of which is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement/prospectus and incorporated herein by reference, see the section entitled “The Merger Agreement” beginning on page 117 of this proxy statement/prospectus.

Approval of the Merger Agreement Proposal is a condition to the Closing under the Merger Agreement. If Spirit Stockholders fail to approve the Merger Agreement Proposal, the Merger will not occur.

Approval of the Merger Agreement Proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Spirit Common Stock entitled to vote thereon. You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” on the Merger Agreement Proposal. A failure to vote, an abstention or a broker non-vote, if any, will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Merger Agreement Proposal.

THE SPIRIT BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE

“FOR” THE MERGER AGREEMENT PROPOSAL.

48

PROPOSAL 2 – ADVISORY COMPENSATION PROPOSAL

This proxy statement/prospectus is being furnished to Spirit Stockholders as part of the solicitation of proxies by the Spirit Board for use at the Special Meeting to consider and vote on the Advisory Compensation Proposal. As required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act and the applicable SEC rules issued thereunder, which were enacted pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, Spirit is required to provide its stockholders the opportunity to vote to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to Spirit’s named executive officers that is based on or otherwise relates to the Merger, as described in the section entitled “The Merger—Interests of Certain Spirit Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger” beginning on page 98 of this proxy statement/prospectus (including the disclosure under the section entitled “—Quantification of Potential Payments and Benefits to Spirit’s Named Executive Officers” beginning on page 104 of this proxy statement/prospectus and the related tables and associated narrative discussion and descriptions of the agreements or understandings pursuant to which such compensation may be paid or become payable). Accordingly, Spirit Stockholders are being provided the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on such payments by voting on the Advisory Compensation Proposal.

Because the vote on the Advisory Compensation Proposal is advisory only, the outcome of the vote on the Advisory Compensation Proposal is not binding upon Spirit, the Spirit Board, Boeing, or the Boeing Board. Approval by Spirit Stockholders of the Advisory Compensation Proposal is not a condition to completion of the Merger and is a vote separate and apart from the vote to approve the Merger Agreement Proposal. Accordingly, a Spirit Stockholder may vote to approve the Advisory Compensation Proposal and vote not to approve the Merger Agreement Proposal and vice versa. Because the executive compensation to be paid in connection with the Merger is based on the terms of the Merger Agreement and the applicable contractual arrangements with Spirit’s named executive officers, such compensation will be payable, regardless of the outcome of the advisory vote on the Advisory Compensation Proposal, only if the Merger Agreement Proposal is approved (subject only to the contractual conditions applicable thereto).

Accordingly, Spirit Stockholders are being asked to vote on an advisory (non-binding) basis on the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. approve, on an advisory, non-binding basis, certain compensation that may be paid or become payable to the named executive officers of Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. that is based on or otherwise relates to the Merger, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402(t) of Regulation S-K under the section entitled “The Merger—Interests of Certain Spirit Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger” beginning on page 98 of the proxy statement/prospectus of Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. and The Boeing Company with respect to the special meeting of Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. stockholders to be held on January 31, 2025 (including the disclosure under the section entitled “—Quantification of Potential Payments and Benefits to Spirit’s Named Executive Officers” beginning on page 104 of such proxy statement/prospectus and the related tables and associated narrative discussion and descriptions of the agreements or understandings pursuant to which such compensation may be paid or become payable).

Approval of the Advisory Compensation Proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast affirmatively and negatively on the Advisory Compensation Proposal, assuming a quorum is present. You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” on the Advisory Compensation Proposal. A failure to vote, an abstention or a broker non-vote, if any, will have no effect on the Advisory Compensation Proposal, assuming a quorum is present.

THE SPIRIT BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE

“FOR” THE ADVISORY COMPENSATION PROPOSAL.

49

PROPOSAL 3 – THE ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL

This proxy statement/prospectus is being furnished to Spirit Stockholders as part of the solicitation of proxies by the Spirit Board for use at the Special Meeting to consider and vote on the Adjournment Proposal, a proposal to approve one or more adjournments of the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to permit solicitation of additional votes or proxies if there are not sufficient votes to approve the Merger Agreement Proposal.

The Adjournment Proposal will be presented at the Special Meeting only if there are not sufficient votes to approve the Merger Agreement Proposal. If Spirit Stockholders approve the Adjournment Proposal, Spirit could adjourn the Special Meeting and any adjourned session of the Special Meeting (subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement as described in the section entitled “The Special Meeting—Adjournment” beginning on page 46 of this proxy statement/prospectus) and use the additional time to solicit additional proxies, including the solicitation of proxies from Spirit Stockholders who have previously voted. Any adjournment of the Special Meeting for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies would allow Spirit Stockholders who have already submitted their proxies to revoke them at any time prior to their use at the Special Meeting, as adjourned. Regardless of the results of voting for the Adjournment Proposal, Spirit’s bylaws provide that any meeting of stockholders may be adjourned or recessed from time to time for any reason, whether or not a quorum is present, by the Spirit Board, the Chair of the Spirit Board or the presiding officer of the meeting.

Approval of the Adjournment Proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast affirmatively and negatively on the Adjournment Proposal, assuming a quorum is present. You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” on the Adjournment Proposal. A failure to vote, an abstention or a broker non-vote, if any, will have no effect on the Adjournment Proposal, assuming a quorum is present.

THE SPIRIT BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE

“FOR” THE ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL.

50

THE MERGER

This section of the proxy statement/prospectus describes the material aspects of the proposed Merger. This section may not contain all of the information that is important to you. You should carefully read this entire proxy statement/prospectus and the documents incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus, including the full text of the Merger Agreement, a copy of which is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Annex A, for a more complete understanding of the proposed Merger and the transactions related thereto.

Parties to the Merger

The Boeing Company

Boeing is one of the world’s major aerospace firms and a leading manufacturer of commercial airplanes and defense, space and security systems. Boeing’s products and tailored services include commercial and military aircraft, satellites, weapons, electronic and defense systems, launch systems, advanced information and communication systems, and performance-based logistics and training.

Boeing was originally incorporated in the State of Washington in 1916 and reincorporated in Delaware in 1934. Boeing’s common stock is listed and traded on the NYSE under the symbol “BA” and its principal executive offices are located at 929 Long Bridge Drive, Arlington, Virginia 22202; its telephone number at that location is (703) 465-3500.

Sphere Acquisition Corp.

Merger Sub is a wholly owned subsidiary of Boeing and was formed solely for the purpose of effecting the Merger. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into Spirit, with Spirit surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Boeing. Merger Sub has not conducted any activities other than those incidental to its formation and the matters contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the preparation of applicable regulatory filings in connection with the Merger.

Merger Sub was incorporated in Delaware on June 28, 2024. Merger Sub’s principal executive offices are located at 929 Long Bridge Drive, Arlington, Virginia 22202; its telephone number at that location is (703) 465-3500.

Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc.

Spirit, incorporated in Delaware with its headquarters in Wichita, Kansas, is one of the world’s largest non-Original Equipment Manufacturer manufacturers of aerostructures, serving markets for commercial airplanes, military platforms and business/regional jets. With expertise in aluminum and advanced composite manufacturing solutions, Spirit’s core products include fuselages, integrated wings and wing components, pylons and nacelles. Spirit also serves the aftermarket for commercial and military platforms.

Boeing is the largest customer of Spirit. For the 12 months ended December 31, 2023, approximately 64% of Spirit’s net revenues were generated from sales to Boeing. In addition, Boeing has, from time to time, made advance payments to Spirit of amounts due to be paid pursuant to Spirit’s supply agreements with Boeing, including under the April 18, 2024 memorandum of agreement and the November 8, 2024 advance payments agreement, each between Spirit AeroSystems, Inc. and Boeing and as amended from time to time.

Airbus is Spirit’s second largest customer. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2023, approximately 19% of Spirit’s net revenues were generated from sales to Airbus. Airbus has, from time to time, made advance payments to Spirit in connection with Spirit’s supply contracts with Airbus.

51

Spirit was incorporated in Delaware in 2005. Spirit’s common stock is listed and traded on the NYSE under the symbol “SPR” and its principal executive offices are located at 3801 South Oliver Street, Wichita, Kansas 67210; its telephone number at that location is (316) 526-9000.

Transaction Structure

Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Merger Agreement and in accordance with the DGCL, at the Effective Time, Merger Sub will merge with and into Spirit, the separate corporate existence of Merger Sub will cease, and Spirit will continue as the surviving corporation in the Merger (the “Surviving Corporation”) and a wholly owned subsidiary of Boeing, and the separate corporate existence of Boeing will continue unaffected by the Merger. The Merger will have the effects set forth in the Merger Agreement and the relevant provisions of the DGCL.

Merger Consideration

On the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, at the Effective Time, each share of Spirit Common Stock that is issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than Excluded Shares) will be automatically cancelled and cease to exist and will be converted into the right to receive a number of shares of Boeing Common Stock that will depend on the Boeing Stock Price (the volume weighted average price per share of Boeing Common Stock on the NYSE for the 15 consecutive trading days ending on and including the second full trading day prior to the Effective Time). If the Boeing Stock Price is greater than $149.00 but less than $206.94, the Exchange Ratio will be the quotient obtained by dividing $37.25 by the Boeing Stock Price, rounded to four decimal places; if the Boeing Stock Price is greater than or equal to $206.94, the Exchange Ratio will be 0.1800; and if the Boeing Stock Price is equal to or less than $149.00, the Exchange Ratio will be 0.2500. Accordingly, if the Boeing Stock Price were greater than or equal to $149.00 and less than or equal to $206.94, the implied value of the Per Share Merger Consideration would be $37.25; if the Boeing Stock Price were greater than $206.94, the implied value of the Per Share Merger Consideration would be greater than $37.25; and if the Boeing Stock Price were less than $149.00, the implied value of the Per Share Merger Consideration would be less than $37.25. The Boeing Stock Price and the actual value of the Per Share Merger Consideration will depend on the trading price of Boeing Common Stock, which is subject to fluctuation, including during the period until the Effective Time. The number of Merger Consideration Shares is subject to fluctuation with the market value of Boeing Common Stock until the Boeing Stock Price has been determined. Shares of Spirit Common Stock are listed on the NYSE under the symbol “SPR.” Shares of Boeing Common Stock are listed on the NYSE under the symbol “BA.” We encourage you to obtain current quotes for both Spirit Common Stock and Boeing Common Stock.

Background of the Merger

As part of its ongoing evaluation of Spirit’s business, the Spirit Board, together with senior management, regularly reviews and assesses opportunities to increase stockholder value, including evaluating various potential strategic alternatives such as acquisitions and dispositions. Spirit also regularly engages with Spirit Stockholders to discuss Spirit and its business, operations and financial results and to hear the views of Spirit Stockholders regarding Spirit.

A significant portion of Spirit’s operations related to Boeing aerostructures was owned and controlled by Boeing until 2005. In 2005, Spirit became a standalone Delaware company and commenced operations through Onex Corporation’s acquisition of Boeing’s operations in Wichita, Kansas, Tulsa, Oklahoma and McAlester, Oklahoma. In connection with that transaction, Spirit and Boeing entered into long-term supply agreements under which Spirit serves as Boeing’s exclusive supplier for substantially all of the products and services previously provided by Boeing’s commercial aerostructures manufacturing operations in Wichita, Tulsa and McAlester.

52

Boeing remains the largest customer of Spirit. For the 12 months ended December 31, 2023, approximately 64% of Spirit’s net revenues were generated from sales to Boeing. Airbus is Spirit’s second largest customer. For the 12 months ended December 31, 2023, approximately 19% of Spirit’s net revenues were generated from sales to Airbus. In the ordinary course of the parties’ commercial businesses, each of Boeing and Airbus has, from time to time, made advance payments to Spirit in connection with Spirit’s supply contracts with Boeing and Airbus, respectively.

Spirit’s supply agreements with Boeing include provisions giving Boeing the ability to terminate the supply agreements in the event any of certain “disqualified persons” acquire a majority of Spirit’s direct or indirect voting power or all or substantially all of Spirit’s assets. In addition, the October 2023 Spirit/Boeing Memorandum of Agreement (as defined below) provides that Spirit cannot, without incurring significant costs, assign (which includes certain specified change of control events) any of its rights or interests in the supply agreements for the B787 Program and B737, B747, B767 and B777 Programs (the “Sustaining Programs”), or orders under such supply agreements, without Boeing’s prior written consent, which may not be unreasonably withheld consistent with existing obligations; except that Boeing may withhold its consent to an assignment to a disqualified person (which includes any person to which Boeing does not consent in its sole discretion) for any reason and at its sole discretion. These provisions in Spirit’s supply agreements with Boeing could discourage others from acquiring Spirit. Certain other agreements with Spirit’s suppliers or customers, including Airbus, contain similar provisions.

In the years leading up to the announcement of the Merger Agreement, a combination of, among other factors, declines in production and sales during the temporary grounding of the B737 MAX beginning in 2019, the COVID-19 pandemic, production rate changes for the B737 MAX program and other programs, supply chain disruptions and quality issues, labor shortages and costs increases adversely impacted Spirit and Boeing.

2022 - 2023

Beginning in late 2022 and continuing throughout 2023, members of management of each of Spirit and Airbus, together with their respective advisors, engaged in discussions and negotiations regarding potential amendments to Spirit’s contracts with Airbus. The potential amendments to Spirit’s contracts with Airbus were designed to improve the economics of certain Airbus programs from Spirit’s perspective, which under their current terms are negative value arrangements to Spirit. These discussions and negotiations continued until March 2024 when the parties turned their discussions and negotiations to the Airbus Transaction (as defined below).

On Wednesday, September 30, 2023, Patrick M. Shanahan was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of Spirit.

In the fall of 2023, Boeing and Spirit entered into discussions with the objectives of (i) mutually resolving prospective claims between the parties related to the Sustaining Programs, (ii) amending various contractual obligations between the parties to improve the economics of certain Boeing programs from Spirit’s perspective and (iii) improving supply stability.

On October 12, 2023, Spirit and Boeing entered into a memorandum of agreement which supplemented the parties’ existing commercial agreements and arrangements and provided for, among other terms and conditions, (i) a payment by Boeing to Spirit of $100 million to fund the purchase of additional tooling and certain capital expenditures, (ii) an amended repayment date for existing financing that had been provided by Boeing to Spirit, (iii) a mutual release of liability and claims for existing matters under the parties’ commercial agreements and (iv) amendments to the parties’ existing commercial agreements to provide that Spirit cannot, without incurring significant

53

costs, assign (which includes certain specified change of control events) any of its rights or interests in the supply agreements for the B787 Program and the Sustaining Programs, or orders under such supply agreements, without Boeing’s prior written consent, subject to certain additional terms (the “October 2023 Spirit/Boeing Memorandum of Agreement”). During the discussion and negotiation of the October 2023 Spirit/Boeing Memorandum of Agreement, members of management of each of Boeing and Spirit had highly preliminary discussions about the possibility of Boeing purchasing a non-controlling equity interest in Spirit. These discussions did not develop into a formal proposal by Boeing, and ultimately the October 2023 Spirit/Boeing Memorandum of Agreement did not include Boeing’s purchase of an equity interest in Spirit.

January 2024

In early January 2024, members of senior management of Boeing discussed a potential reintegration of Spirit. Boeing’s senior management believed a potential reintegration would improve the safety and quality of Boeing airplanes by integrating Boeing’s and Spirit’s engineering, manufacturing and quality and safety programs and teams, and would promote supply chain stability and the ability to facilitate production rate increases. Following discussion and consultation with Boeing’s financial and legal advisors, Boeing’s senior management concluded that such a reintegration, if it were done on appropriate terms, would serve the interest of the flying public, both companies’ employees and customers and Boeing Stockholders, and decided to approach Spirit regarding a potential acquisition of Spirit.

On Wednesday, January 17, 2024, David L. Calhoun, then President and Chief Executive Officer of Boeing, called Robert D. Johnson, Chair of the Spirit Board, regarding Boeing’s interest in potentially making a proposal to acquire Spirit (the “Boeing Outreach”).

On Thursday, January 18, 2024, Spirit engaged Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (“Skadden”) as legal counsel in connection with the consideration of a potential strategic transaction and other strategic and financial alternatives. On Monday, January 22, 2024, Spirit engaged Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (“Morgan Stanley”), who has a longstanding financial advisory relationship with Spirit, as financial advisor in connection with the consideration of a potential strategic transaction and other strategic and financial alternatives.

On Wednesday, January 24, 2024, the Spirit Board held a meeting to discuss, among other matters, the Boeing Outreach. Representatives of Skadden and Morgan Stanley were in attendance. The Spirit Board reviewed, discussed and considered the Boeing Outreach and next steps with respect to the Boeing Outreach. The Spirit Board, together with the representatives from Morgan Stanley and Skadden, also discussed and considered Spirit’s existing standalone strategic plan and other potential alternatives, including strategic acquisitions and divestitures, other potential acquirers and the benefits and risks of a strategic transaction with Boeing or other potential acquirers (including the effect on Spirit’s existing and prospective business and its relationship with customers and suppliers). Representatives of Skadden also reviewed the Spirit Board’s fiduciary duties. Following discussion and consideration, the Spirit Board instructed Mr. Johnson and Irene M. Esteves, an independent director of Spirit at such time, to engage in preliminary and non-binding discussions with Boeing regarding a potential strategic transaction and to continue considering other potential strategic and financial alternatives together with Skadden and Morgan Stanley.

On Thursday, January 25, 2024, Mr. Johnson, Ms. Esteves and a representative from Skadden met in-person with Mr. Calhoun and Brett C. Gerry, Chief Legal Officer of Boeing, to discuss the Boeing Outreach. At this meeting, Boeing delivered the “Project Sphere Non-Binding Term Sheet” (the “January 25 Non-Binding Proposal”). The January 25 Non-Binding Proposal included, among other terms and conditions, a $33.00 per share cash merger consideration, a “reasonable best efforts”

54

standard to obtain the required regulatory approvals (and Boeing’s obligation to accept remedies limited to those in respect of Spirit’s operations for and business with Airbus), a reverse termination fee of $150 million payable by Boeing for failure to obtain the required regulatory approvals (with Spirit’s use of such proceeds limited to safety and quality system initiatives), an outside date of October 31, 2024 and that Spirit employee awards would roll over into Boeing awards, with vesting and treatment of performance incentives to be determined. The January 25 Non-Binding Proposal stated it was non-binding and subject to Boeing’s due diligence.

On Friday, January 26, 2024, the Spirit Board held a meeting to discuss, among other matters, the January 25 Non-Binding Proposal. Representatives of Skadden and Morgan Stanley were in attendance. The Spirit Board reviewed, discussed and considered the January 25 Non-Binding Proposal, the proposed terms and conditions thereof and potential responses to Boeing. The Spirit Board also discussed Spirit’s existing standalone strategic plan and other potential strategic alternatives. Representatives of Skadden and Morgan Stanley reviewed and discussed with the Spirit Board the legal and financial aspects of the January 25 Non-Binding Proposal. Following discussion and consideration, the Spirit Board determined to continue considering the January 25 Non-Binding Proposal. The Spirit Board also instructed Skadden and Morgan Stanley to perform further legal and financial analysis, respectively, regarding the January 25 Non-Binding Proposal and instructed Spirit’s management to update Spirit’s existing standalone strategic plan and Morgan Stanley to perform a financial analysis of Spirit based on the standalone strategic plan in order assist the Spirit Board in its review and consideration of the January 25 Non-Binding Proposal and other strategic and financial alternatives.

In late January 2024, members of management of each of Spirit and Airbus, together with their respective advisors, expanded their ongoing discussions and negotiations regarding potential amendments to Spirit’s contracts with Airbus to also include the potential divestiture to Airbus of certain facilities and operations that support Airbus programs. These discussions and negotiations continued until March 2024 when the parties turned their discussions and negotiations to the Airbus Transaction (as defined below).

February 2024

On Friday, February 2, 2024, the Spirit Board held a meeting to discuss, among other matters, Spirit’s standalone strategic plan and the January 25 Non-Binding Proposal. Members of Spirit’s management and representatives of Skadden and Morgan Stanley were in attendance. The Spirit Board reviewed and discussed potential updates to Spirit’s standalone strategic plan, the components thereof and assumptions and projections therein, including as it relates to Spirit’s ongoing discussions and negotiations with Airbus that had been ongoing since 2022 regarding potential amendments to Spirit’s contracts with Airbus. The potential updates to Spirit’s standalone strategic plan would include the use of a “downside,” “base” and “upside” plan which, in each case, would include, among other assumptions, certain assumptions around whether (and to what extent) Spirit would be successful in obtaining improved terms and conditions from Airbus in respect of Spirit’s commercial arrangements with Airbus and whether (and to what extent) Spirit’s business with Boeing would increase and accelerate due to increased demand and delivery rates from Boeing. The Spirit Board also continued to review, discuss and consider the January 25 Non-Binding Proposal, the terms and conditions thereof and potential responses to Boeing. Representatives of Skadden and Morgan Stanley provided further legal and financial analysis, respectively, regarding the January 25 Non-Binding Proposal, the Spirit Board’s continued review of the January 25 Non-Binding Proposal and the Spirit Board’s consideration of other strategic and financial alternatives.

During the two weeks following Boeing’s delivery of the January 25 Non-Binding Proposal, Mr. Calhoun periodically contacted Mr. Johnson to inquire as to the status of the Spirit Board’s

55

consideration of the January 25 Non-Binding Proposal. Mr. Johnson responded that it was under consideration by the Spirit Board, that Spirit was undertaking legal and financial analysis and that Spirit intended to respond in due course.

On Friday, February 9, 2024, the Spirit Board held a meeting to discuss, among other matters, the Spirit Board’s fiduciary duties and process considerations in connection with the Spirit Board’s review and consideration of the January 25 Non-Binding Proposal, Spirit’s standalone strategic plan, the preliminary financial analysis of Spirit prepared by Morgan Stanley and other strategic and financial alternatives. Members of Spirit’s management and representatives of Skadden and Morgan Stanley were in attendance, and each of Skadden and Morgan Stanley had prepared and distributed materials to the Spirit Board in advance of the meeting. Representatives of Skadden reviewed with the Spirit Board the terms and conditions of the January 25 Non-Binding Proposal, the Spirit Board’s fiduciary duties and process considerations in connection with the Spirit Board’s review and consideration of the January 25 Non-Binding Proposal and Morgan Stanley’s relationship disclosures, previously provided to the Spirit Board, of its prior engagements by Spirit, Boeing and Airbus. After considering the matter, the Spirit Board determined it was advisable and in the best interests of Spirit and Spirit Stockholders to continue the engagement of Morgan Stanley as Spirit’s financial advisor in connection with the consideration of a potential strategic transaction with Boeing and other strategic and financial alternatives. Next, representatives of Morgan Stanley reviewed with the Spirit Board a preliminary financial analysis and review of strategic and financial alternatives, including a review of Spirit’s standalone strategic plan, the assumptions, projections and sensitivities thereto, and the terms of the January 25 Non-Binding Proposal. Following discussion and consideration, the Spirit Board determined that it was not in the best interests of Spirit and Spirit Stockholders to transact or engage with Boeing at a $33.00 per share cash merger consideration (together with the other terms and conditions set forth in the January 25 Non-Binding Proposal) and provided instructions to Morgan Stanley and Skadden to prepare a response to Boeing for the Spirit Board’s consideration.

On Monday, February 12, 2024, the Spirit Board held a meeting to further discuss and consider Spirit’s response to Boeing regarding the January 25 Non-Binding Proposal. Representatives of Skadden and Morgan Stanley were in attendance. After discussion and consideration of the terms of the January 25 Non-Binding Proposal, including Spirit’s anticipated short-term and long-term outlook and the strategic importance and benefits to Boeing of Boeing’s potential acquisition of Spirit, the Spirit Board determined that Mr. Johnson would contact Mr. Calhoun and communicate that Spirit would not transact or engage with Boeing at a valuation of $33.00 per share in cash (together with the other terms and conditions set forth in the January 25 Non-Binding Proposal). The Spirit Board also directed Mr. Johnson to communicate to Mr. Calhoun that, if so requested by Boeing, Spirit would make available representatives of Morgan Stanley to Boeing’s financial advisors in order to provide Boeing’s financial advisors (and Boeing) with Spirit’s view as to its financial outlook and prospects.

Shortly after the Spirit Board’s meeting, on Monday, February 12, 2024, Mr. Johnson contacted Mr. Calhoun and delivered the Spirit Board’s response to the January 25 Non-Binding Proposal. Mr. Calhoun did not respond at that time.

On Wednesday, February 14, 2024 and Thursday, February 15, 2024, representatives of Boeing’s financial advisor, PJT Partners LP (“PJT Partners”) and representatives of Morgan Stanley held calls during which representatives of Morgan Stanley communicated, on a confidential basis and at the direction of Spirit, certain financial information to representatives of PJT Partners reflecting Spirit’s view as to its financial outlook and prospects. The representatives of Morgan Stanley noted that it was the Spirit Board’s view that Boeing’s offer of $33.00 per share in cash merger consideration undervalued Spirit and its financial outlook and prospects. Among the matters discussed, at the direction of Boeing, representatives of PJT Partners shared Boeing’s perspective that certain of the assumptions in the financial information as they related to Boeing were too optimistic and did not

56

reflect Boeing’s expectations of Spirit’s financial outlook and prospects based on Boeing’s familiarity with Spirit’s business and prospects (due to the longstanding relationship between Spirit and Boeing and the ongoing information sharing by Spirit with Boeing as required under certain of Spirit’s commercial arrangements with Boeing) and Boeing’s anticipated production rates (and the related impact on Spirit’s business outlook as a supplier to Boeing).

On Friday, February 16, 2024, the Spirit Board held a meeting to discuss the status of the potential strategic transaction with Boeing and other financial and strategic alternatives. Members of Spirit’s management and representatives of Skadden and Morgan Stanley were in attendance. The representatives of Morgan Stanley reviewed with the Spirit Board the prior discussion between representatives of Morgan Stanley and PJT Partners and provided further financial and strategic advice, including addressing the points raised by representatives of PJT Partners, on behalf of Boeing, in the most recent discussions. The representatives of Skadden reviewed with the Spirit Board the rights and obligations under Spirit’s commercial agreements with Boeing and Airbus and the impact of these commercial agreements in connection with a potential strategic transaction with Boeing, including the fact that certain of Spirit’s commercial agreements with Airbus may give Airbus the right to exercise certain remedies, including termination and collection of certain monetary payments, upon an acquisition of Spirit by Boeing. The Spirit Board instructed Morgan Stanley and Skadden to continue their financial and legal analysis, respectively, of a potential strategic transaction with Boeing as well as other financial and strategic alternatives.

Over the next several days, Mr. Calhoun and Mr. Johnson communicated several times, during which Mr. Calhoun communicated Boeing’s continued interest in a potential strategic transaction with Spirit, but that Boeing disagreed with Spirit’s assumptions and projections in the Spirit financial information that had been made available to Boeing. In addition, during that period, representatives of Morgan Stanley and PJT Partners continued to discuss and review the Spirit financial information that had been made available to Boeing, during which, at the direction of Boeing, the representatives of PJT Partners reiterated Boeing’s view that Spirit’s assumptions and projections were subject to several uncertainties, including those relating to Boeing.

On Tuesday, February 20, 2024, Mr. Calhoun, after deliberations with the Boeing Board, sent a letter to the Spirit Board proposing to increase the $33.00 per share cash merger consideration to $39.15 per share in cash (the “February 20 Non-Binding Proposal”). The February 20 Non-Binding Proposal stated, among other things, that the offer was based on the plan elements shared with Boeing’s bankers and Boeing’s own knowledge of Spirit’s current and future business prospects and that Boeing viewed the offer as one that would mitigate many risks and potential costs that Spirit will face in the near and long term. The February 20 Non-Binding Proposal generally reflected the other terms and conditions from the January 25 Non-Binding Proposal, but provided for an outside date of November 30, 2024 and stated that the February 20 Non-Binding Proposal was non-binding and subject to Boeing’s due diligence. Around the time of the delivery of the February 20 Non-Binding Proposal, Mr. Calhoun contacted Mr. Johnson and, at the direction of Boeing, representatives of PJT Partners contacted representatives of Morgan Stanley to, in each case, state that Boeing had proposed a substantial increase to the proposed per share merger consideration and that Boeing was not likely to consider any additional increase.

On Wednesday, February 21, 2024, the Spirit Board held a meeting to discuss and consider the February 20 Non-Binding Proposal. Representatives of Morgan Stanley and Skadden were in attendance. As part of the Spirit Board’s discussion and consideration of the February 20 Non-Binding Proposal, Mr. Johnson and the representatives of Morgan Stanley provided the Spirit Board with further explanation and information on Boeing’s response to the Spirit financial information that had been provided to representatives of PJT Partners by representatives of Morgan Stanley. The Spirit Board did not take any action regarding the February 20 Non-Binding Proposal at the meeting.

57

On Thursday, February 22, 2024, the Spirit Board held a meeting to further discuss and consider, among other matters, the February 20 Non-Binding Proposal. Members of Spirit’s management and representatives of Morgan Stanley were in attendance. The Spirit Board continued its review, consideration and discussion of the February 20 Non-Binding Proposal. The Spirit Board also received an update on and summary of the status of the discussions with Airbus regarding potential amendments to Spirit’s contracts with Airbus and the potential divestiture to Airbus of certain facilities and operations that support Airbus programs, including the potential impact thereof on a potential strategic transaction with Boeing. The Spirit Board discussed the risks and opportunities of a potential strategic transaction with Boeing, continuing to operate as a standalone company and other strategic and financial alternatives. Following discussion and consideration, the Spirit Board determined to respond to Boeing that the Spirit Board was not prepared to transact or engage with Boeing at a $39.15 per share cash merger consideration (together with the other terms and conditions set forth in the February 20 Non-Binding Proposal).

Shortly after the Spirit Board’s meeting, on Thursday, February 22, 2024, Mr. Johnson contacted Mr. Calhoun and delivered the Spirit Board’s response to the February 20 Non-Binding Proposal. Mr. Johnson indicated to Mr. Calhoun that Spirit may be prepared to engage in further discussions with Boeing regarding a potential transaction if Boeing were to further improve its proposal, including by increasing its proposed offer price, increasing the amount of the reverse termination fee to at least $300 million and extending the proposed outside date. Following discussion, Mr. Calhoun stated that Boeing would be prepared to increase its proposal to $40.00 per share in cash (together with the other terms and conditions set forth in the February 20 Non-Binding Proposal, except that, as communicated by Mr. Calhoun, Boeing would also be prepared to consider increasing the reverse termination fee and extending the outside date) (the “February 22 Non-Binding Proposal”). In making the February 22 Non-Binding Proposal, Mr. Calhoun stated that Boeing would not be prepared to further increase the proposed $40.00 per share in cash merger consideration. Mr. Johnson responded that he would communicate the increased proposal to the Spirit Board.

On Friday, February 23, 2024, the Spirit Board held a meeting to discuss and consider the February 22 Non-Binding Proposal. Members of Spirit’s management and representatives of Skadden and Morgan Stanley were in attendance. The Spirit Board reviewed, discussed and considered the February 22 Non-Binding Proposal and the terms and conditions thereof, including the proposed “reasonable best efforts” standard to obtain the required regulatory approvals (and Boeing’s obligation to accept remedies limited to those in respect of Spirit’s operations for, and business with, Airbus), and the $300 million reverse termination fee payable by Boeing for failure to obtain the required regulatory approvals as proposed by Mr. Johnson. In addition, the Spirit Board discussed and considered the potential impact on Spirit’s business if a strategic transaction with Boeing was entered into (or leaked) including the impact on Spirit’s other customers (including Airbus and, with respect to the pending negotiations with Airbus, regarding amendments to Spirit’s contracts with Airbus and the potential divestiture to Airbus of certain facilities and operations that support Airbus programs) and its suppliers, regulators and other stakeholders. Representatives of Skadden and Morgan Stanley reviewed with the Spirit Board a potential timeline to both the signing of a potential strategic transaction with Boeing and to the closing of such a potential strategic transaction, including the due diligence process prior to signing and the regulatory review process prior to the closing of such a potential strategic transaction. The Spirit Board considered the likelihood that, in light of Spirit’s role as an Airbus supplier, which is Boeing’s principal competitor in commercial jet manufacturing, Spirit’s divestiture of its facilities and operations that support Airbus’s programs would be the most efficient way to obtain regulatory approvals and would likely be an important component of the potential strategic transaction with Boeing. Following further discussion and consideration, the Spirit Board determined, based on Boeing’s proposed merger consideration of $40.00 per share in cash, together with the other terms and conditions of the February 22 Non-Binding Proposal, that proceeding with negotiations and due diligence with Boeing was in the best interests of Spirit and Spirit Stockholders. The Spirit Board requested that Mr. Johnson

58

inform Mr. Calhoun that Spirit would continue discussions, negotiations and due diligence based on the February 22 Non-Binding Proposal. The Spirit Board also instructed Spirit’s management, together with Skadden and Morgan Stanley, to proceed with the legal and financial processes for a potential strategic transaction with Boeing and also to continue to proceed with the legal and financial processes regarding potential amendments to Spirit’s contracts with Airbus and the potential divestiture to Airbus of certain facilities and operations that support Airbus programs.

Shortly after the Spirit Board’s meeting, on Friday, February 23, 2024, Mr. Johnson contacted Mr. Calhoun and delivered the Spirit Board’s response to the February 22 Non-Binding Proposal. Later that same day, representatives of Skadden distributed to representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, Boeing’s legal counsel (“Sullivan & Cromwell”), a proposed non-disclosure agreement in respect of a potential acquisition of Spirit by Boeing (the “Spirit/Boeing Non-Disclosure Agreement”). During the following week, Spirit and Boeing, together with representatives of Skadden and Sullivan & Cromwell, negotiated the Spirit/Boeing Non-Disclosure Agreement. On Wednesday, February 28, 2024, Spirit and Boeing executed the Spirit/Boeing Non-Disclosure Agreement. The Spirit/Boeing Non-Disclosure Agreement included, among other customary terms and conditions, a nine-month “standstill” provision restricting Boeing’s ability to publicly announce an unsolicited offer to acquire Spirit and take certain related actions, subject to customary exceptions. Such exceptions included that such “standstill” restrictions will immediately terminate under certain circumstances, including in the event that Spirit publicly announces a definitive agreement with a third party for the acquisition of Spirit. The Spirit/Boeing Non-Disclosure Agreement did not otherwise vary pre-existing confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements and obligations between Spirit and Boeing with respect to their commercial relationships.

On Sunday, February 25, 2024, Boeing provided to Spirit its initial due diligence request list. On Saturday, March 2, 2024, Spirit made available to Boeing and its advisors a virtual data room. Thereafter until the signing of the Merger Agreement on June 30, 2024, Boeing continued its due diligence review of Spirit. Throughout this period, members of Boeing’s and Spirit’s management, together with their respective advisors, participated in a substantial number of in-person and virtual due diligence meetings and a substantial number of materials were made available to Boeing and its advisors in a virtual data room.

March 2024

In the late morning of Friday, March 1, 2024, the Wall Street Journal reported that Boeing was in discussions with Spirit regarding a potential acquisition of Spirit by Boeing. After the closing of the financial markets in New York, each of Spirit and Boeing issued statements confirming the discussions. No assurances were given that a definitive agreement would be entered into, that any transaction would be consummated, or the timing, terms or conditions of any such potential transaction. On Thursday, February 29, 2024, the closing price of Spirit Common Stock was $28.60 per share.

Later in the day on Friday, March 1, 2024, the Spirit Board held a meeting to discuss the status of the potential strategic transaction with Boeing and the potential contract amendments with, and potential divestitures to, Airbus. Members of Spirit’s management and representatives of Skadden and Morgan Stanley were in attendance. Morgan Stanley reviewed with the Spirit Board an update on the various workstreams and potential timelines with respect to the potential strategic transaction with Boeing. The Spirit Board also continued to discuss the potential impact of the parties’ announcement confirming discussions on Spirit’s customers (including, with respect to Airbus, Airbus’s rights and remedies under its commercial agreements with Spirit) and other stakeholders, including its employees and regulators.

59

On Sunday, March 3, 2024, representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell distributed to representatives of Skadden the first draft of the proposed merger agreement to be entered into between Spirit and Boeing, which was generally consistent with the terms and conditions set forth in the February 22 Non-Binding Proposal and which contemplated, among other terms and conditions, (i) a customary “no shop” provision restricting Spirit from soliciting acquisition proposals, but allowing Spirit to receive, negotiate and ultimately enter into certain unsolicited acquisition proposals, (ii) a “reasonable best efforts” standard on both Spirit and Boeing to obtain applicable required regulatory approvals and contractual consents, with Boeing’s obligation to accept remedies limited to those in respect of Spirit’s operations for, and business with, Airbus, (iii) an “outside date” of up to 15 months after the signing of the merger agreement, (iv) a reverse termination fee (in an amount not identified) payable by Boeing in customary scenarios, including for the parties’ failure to obtain applicable required regulatory approvals by the outside date, (v) a restriction on Spirit’s use of the reverse termination fee to safety and quality system initiatives approved by Boeing and (vi) a termination fee (in an amount not identified) payable by Spirit in customary scenarios, including for Spirit’s termination of the merger agreement to accept a superior proposal.

During the week of March 3, 2024, representatives of Airbus contacted Mr. Shanahan expressing Airbus’s desire to engage with Spirit on the potential acquisition by Airbus of all of the facilities and operations that support Airbus programs (the “Airbus Business”).

Hereafter, the potential acquisition of Spirit by Boeing is referred to as the “Boeing Transaction” and the potential acquisition by Airbus of the Airbus Business is referred to as the “Airbus Transaction.”

On Friday, March 8, 2024, the Spirit Board held a meeting to discuss, among other matters, the status of the Boeing Transaction, the potential contract amendments with Airbus and the Airbus Transaction. Members of Spirit’s management and representatives of Skadden and Morgan Stanley were in attendance. The Spirit Board received an update on the status of each of the potential transactions. The Spirit Board reviewed, discussed and considered the Airbus Transaction, the impact of the Airbus Transaction on Spirit’s discussions with Airbus regarding potential contract amendments and certain potential divestitures, other strategic and financial alternatives for the Airbus Business and the impact of the Airbus Transaction on the Boeing Transaction. Representatives of Skadden reviewed with the Spirit Board the terms and conditions of the merger agreement proposed by Boeing and discussed with the Spirit Board the potential response thereto.

Later in the day on Friday, March 8, 2024, representatives of Skadden distributed to representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell a revised draft of the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction which contemplated, among other terms and conditions, (i) additional flexibility and permissions for the Spirit Board in connection with the “no shop” provision, (ii) additional obligations on Boeing in its use of “reasonable best efforts” to obtain the required regulatory approvals and contractual consents, (iii) the removal of the timing of the “outside date” pending further diligence, (iv) the removal of the use restrictions on the reverse termination fee, (v) additional termination situations in which Boeing would be required to pay the reverse termination fee, (vi) revisions to the termination rights, conditions to closing, representations and warranties and the definition of “material adverse effect” intended to increase the certainty of the closing of the Boeing Transaction, (vii) revisions to the interim operating covenants intended to provide Spirit with additional flexibility to operate its business prior to the closing of the Boeing Transaction and (viii) revisions to employee benefits matters and the treatment of employee equity awards.

After Friday, March 8 and prior to Sunday, March 17, 2024, representatives of Skadden and representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell held numerous calls to discuss and negotiate the terms and conditions of the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction.

60

On Sunday, March 17, 2024, representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell distributed to representatives of Skadden a revised draft of the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction which contemplated, among other terms and conditions, (i) removal of certain of the additional obligations on Boeing in its use of “reasonable best efforts” to obtain the required regulatory approvals and contractual consents (namely, those incremental to Boeing’s obligation to accept remedies in respect of the Airbus Business), (ii) re-inclusion of the “outside date” of up to 15 months after the signing of the merger agreement, (iii) re-inclusion of the use restrictions on the reverse termination fee, (iv) revisions to the interim operating covenants to re-include certain guardrails on Spirit’s operation of its business prior to the closing of the Boeing Transaction, (v) revisions to employee benefits matters and the treatment of employee equity awards and (vi) certain changes to termination rights, conditions to closing, representations and warranties and the definition of “material adverse effect.”

On Monday, March 18, 2024, representatives of Skadden distributed to representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell the initial draft of the disclosure schedules to the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction. Thereafter, until Sunday, June 30, 2024, representatives of Skadden and representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell exchanged several versions of the disclosure schedules to the proposed merger agreement and negotiated the terms thereof.

During the weeks of March 17, 2024 and March 24, 2024 and thereafter, members of Spirit’s management team, together with Morgan Stanley, engaged in numerous in-person and virtual meetings with Airbus and its representatives to discuss the scope of the Airbus Business and a framework for the valuation thereof. Throughout this period and thereafter, Airbus and its representatives were provided additional due diligence materials.

On Thursday, March 21, 2024, representatives of Skadden distributed to representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell a revised draft of the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction which contemplated, among other terms and conditions, (i) the removal of the timing of the “outside date” pending further diligence, (ii) the removal of the use restrictions on the reverse termination fee, (iii) the inclusion of $300 million for the reverse termination fee and (iv) the re-inclusion of certain provisions of Skadden’s draft of the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction as of Friday, March 8, 2024, including with respect to obligations on Boeing to obtain required regulatory approvals and contractual consents, interim operating covenants, the treatment of employee equity awards, termination rights, representations and warranties and the definition of “material adverse effect.”

On and after Thursday, March 21 and prior to Tuesday, March 26, 2024, representatives of Skadden and representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell held numerous calls to discuss and negotiate the terms and conditions of the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction.

On Friday, March 22, 2024, the Spirit Board held a meeting to discuss, among other matters, the status of the Boeing Transaction and the Airbus Transaction. Members of Spirit’s management and representatives of Skadden and Morgan Stanley were in attendance. The Spirit Board received an update on the status of each of the potential transactions, including the status of Boeing’s and Airbus’s respective due diligence processes (including, with respect to Airbus, the recent in-person meetings). Representatives of Skadden reviewed with the Spirit Board the current terms and conditions of the proposed merger agreement and discussed with the Spirit Board the potential response thereto.

On Monday, March 25, 2024, Boeing announced that it was Mr. Calhoun’s intention to step down as Boeing’s President and Chief Executive Officer by the end of 2024 and that the Boeing Board was conducting a search for Mr. Calhoun’s successor.

61

On Tuesday, March 26, 2024, representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell distributed to representatives of Skadden a revised draft of the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction which generally reflected the terms and conditions negotiated between the representatives of Skadden and Sullivan & Cromwell during the previous week and also, among other terms and conditions, re-inserted the use restrictions on the reverse termination fee, removed $300 million as the amount of the reverse termination fee (without providing a counterproposal), and reserved on the regulatory efforts covenant pending further discussion regarding the Airbus Transaction. Thereafter, representatives of Skadden and Sullivan & Cromwell continued to negotiate the terms and conditions of the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction.

On Wednesday, March 27, 2024, following discussions between Boeing and Spirit of Boeing’s interest in the potential impact of the Airbus Transaction on the Boeing Transaction and Boeing’s belief that the sale of Spirit’s facilities and operations supporting Airbus programs would be the most efficient way to obtain regulatory approvals, representatives of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, Airbus’s legal counsel (“Davis Polk”), distributed to representatives of Skadden the proposed tri-party confidentiality agreement to be entered into by and among Spirit, Boeing and Airbus (the “Tri-Party Confidentiality Agreement”). The purpose of the Tri-Party Confidentiality Agreement was to permit diligence and transaction information to be shared between and among the parties.

On Friday, March 29, 2024, the Spirit Board held a meeting to discuss, among other matters, the status of the Boeing Transaction and the Airbus Transaction. Members of Spirit’s management and representatives of Skadden and Morgan Stanley were in attendance. The Spirit Board received an update on the status of each of the potential transactions, including the status of Boeing’s and Airbus’s respective due diligence processes. The Spirit Board also discussed and considered Boeing’s request that Boeing be involved in discussions with Airbus regarding the Airbus Transaction and how (and under what restrictions) information would be shared among Spirit, Boeing and Airbus. Regarding the Boeing Transaction, representatives of Skadden reviewed with the Spirit Board the current terms and conditions of the proposed merger agreement and discussed with the Spirit Board the potential response thereto. Regarding the Airbus Transaction, Mr. Shanahan summarized the negotiations with Airbus during the previous weeks, including that Airbus had indicated that it would expect to receive a payment in excess of $1.2 billion (payable to Airbus) to acquire the Airbus Business. The Spirit Board discussed and considered potential alternatives to the Airbus Transaction, including the potential divestiture to third parties and other options under the parties’ commercial contracts. Following discussion and consideration, the Spirit Board determined that Spirit’s management team, together with Skadden and Morgan Stanley, should continue to analyze potential alternatives to the Airbus Transaction while also progressing the negotiations with Boeing for the Boeing Transaction and with Airbus for the Airbus Transaction, in each case with a view toward maximizing value to Spirit Stockholders.

On Saturday, March 30, 2024, representatives of Skadden distributed to representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell a revised draft of the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction which generally reflected the terms and conditions negotiated between the representatives of Skadden and Sullivan & Cromwell during the previous week and also contemplated, among other terms and conditions, (i) expanded exceptions to the interim operating covenants and revisions to the “bring down” standard of the representations and warranties and the termination provisions and (ii) the removal of the use restrictions on the reverse termination fee and the re-inclusion of $300 million as the amount of the reverse termination fee. Thereafter, representatives of Skadden and Sullivan & Cromwell continued to negotiate the terms and conditions of the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction.

62

April 2024

Following negotiations, on Tuesday, April 9, 2024, Spirit, Boeing and Airbus entered into the Tri-Party Confidentiality Agreement. The Tri-Party Confidentiality Agreement did not include an express “standstill” covenant by Airbus.

In early April 2024, representatives of Spirit contacted representatives of Boeing to discuss potential advances, loans or other financial accommodations by Boeing to support Spirit’s operations, Boeing programs and financial condition. In response to Spirit’s request, from early April 2024 through Thursday, April 18, 2024, members of management of each of Spirit and Boeing discussed and negotiated a proposed memorandum of agreement to be entered into between Spirit and Boeing providing for, among other things, a $425 million cash advance payment to Spirit in respect of certain existing commercial arrangements between the parties (the “April 2024 Spirit/Boeing Memorandum of Agreement”). Following, and in light of, the discussions with Boeing regarding the April 2024 Spirit/Boeing Memorandum of Agreement (together with the Spirit Board’s and Spirit’s management’s continued review of Spirit’s financial condition and prospects), members of management of Spirit instructed Morgan Stanley, who had historically advised Spirit on financing transactions, to review and prepare proposals for potential loan and other liquidity solutions for Spirit. Spirit’s management had determined that Morgan Stanley would be best suited to provide such proposals to Spirit given Morgan Stanley’s familiarity with Spirit and its financial condition and prospects which Spirit’s management believed would increase the speed and efficiency at which Morgan Stanley could operate.

On Wednesday, April 10, 2024, representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell distributed to representatives of Skadden a revised draft of the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction which generally reflected the terms and conditions negotiated between representatives of Skadden and Sullivan & Cromwell during the previous week and also contemplated, among other terms, (i) revisions to the regulatory efforts covenant that provided Spirit with the ability to control the negotiations with Airbus in respect of the Airbus Transaction for a period of 90 days following the signing of the merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction, (ii) the re-inclusion of the use restrictions on the reverse termination fee and the continued rejection of $300 million as the amount of the reverse termination fee (without providing a counterproposal), (iii) revisions to employee benefits matters and the treatment of employee equity awards and (iv) revisions to the termination rights, conditions to closing, representations and warranties, the definition of “material adverse effect” and the interim operating covenants.

On Friday, April 12, 2024, the Spirit Board held a meeting to discuss, among other matters, the status of the Boeing Transaction, the status of the Airbus Transaction and the April 2024 Spirit/Boeing Memorandum of Agreement. Members of Spirit’s management and representatives of Skadden and Morgan Stanley were in attendance. The Spirit Board received an update on and discussed the status of each of the potential transactions, including the status of Boeing’s and Airbus’s respective due diligence processes including, with respect to the Airbus Transaction, the proposed in-person tri-party meetings between Spirit, Boeing, Airbus and their respective advisors to be held in New York the following week. Regarding the Boeing Transaction, representatives of Skadden reviewed with the Spirit Board the current terms and conditions of the proposed merger agreement and the Spirit Board discussed and considered Spirit’s response thereto. Representatives of Skadden and Morgan Stanley also reviewed with the Spirit Board various process considerations with respect to the Boeing Transaction and the Airbus Transaction. Regarding the Airbus Transaction, the Spirit Board received an update on Airbus’s framework for the valuation of the Airbus Business, which Airbus had indicated would include Spirit paying the costs to separate the Airbus Business from the remainder of Spirit’s businesses and would not give Spirit the benefit of certain of the pricing, production, delivery and other matters that were previously under negotiation between Spirit and Airbus. The Spirit Board discussed and considered Spirit’s response thereto. Finally, the Spirit Board reviewed and approved the April 2024 Spirit/Boeing Memorandum of Agreement.

63

Beginning on Monday, April 15, 2024, and continuing through Wednesday, April 17, 2024, members of management of each of Spirit, Boeing and Airbus, together with their respective legal and financial advisors, held in-person meetings in New York with Spirit and Airbus reviewing, discussing and negotiating the terms and conditions of the Airbus Transaction. During the course of the discussions and negotiations, Airbus revised its framework for the valuation of the Airbus Business from an amount in excess of negative $1.2 billion (payable to Airbus) to approximately negative $750 million (payable to Airbus). At this time, members of management of Airbus informed members of management of Spirit that any valuation by Airbus of the Airbus Business would not take into account potential contract amendments (with respect to pricing, production, delivery and other matters) that were previously under negotiation between Spirit and Airbus.

During these meetings, on Tuesday, April 16, 2024, representatives of Davis Polk distributed to representatives of Skadden and Sullivan & Cromwell the first draft of the proposed term sheet for the Airbus Transaction, which contemplated, among other terms and conditions, (i) that the term sheet would be entered into between Spirit and Airbus, with Boeing providing a guaranty of Spirit’s obligations upon the signing of the definitive agreements with respect to the Airbus Transaction, (ii) that the term sheet was non-binding on any party, (iii) a payment to Airbus (with no proposed amount) as consideration for Airbus’s acquisition of the Airbus Business, (iv) that amounts owed to Airbus under existing commercial agreements with Spirit would be repaid by Spirit at the closing of the Airbus Transaction, (v) the proposed scope of the Airbus Business, including the businesses, operations, personnel, intellectual property, assets and liabilities thereof, (vi) that Spirit would pay Airbus’s fees and expenses in connection with the Airbus Transaction, (vii) among other closing conditions, that the closing of the Airbus Transaction was conditioned on the substantially concurrent closing of the Boeing Transaction and (viii) a 60-day exclusivity period for Airbus commencing on the date the term sheet is entered into. Thereafter, members of management of Spirit and Boeing, together with representatives of Skadden and Sullivan & Cromwell, discussed, reviewed and prepared revisions to the proposed term sheet for the Airbus Transaction that had been distributed to the parties by Davis Polk.

On Wednesday, April 17, 2024, following the conclusion of these meetings, the Spirit Board was provided an update on, and summary of, these meetings. Thereafter, Spirit continued its review and consideration of potential alternatives to the Airbus Transaction, including the potential divestiture to third parties, options under the parties’ commercial contracts and other alternatives, while also continuing to negotiate with Airbus for the Airbus Transaction.

On Thursday, April 18, 2024, Spirit’s wholly owned subsidiary that is party to commercial agreements with Boeing, Spirit AeroSystems, Inc., and Boeing entered into the April 2024 Spirit/Boeing Memorandum of Agreement, which Spirit publicly disclosed on Tuesday, April 23, 2024.

During the weeks of April 14, 2024, and April 21, 2024, representatives of Skadden and Sullivan & Cromwell continued to exchange drafts of the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction and negotiate the terms and conditions thereof. Certain of the material provisions that remained unresolved included (i) the amount of and the use restrictions on the reverse termination fee (along with a new proposal from Boeing that the cash advances under the April 2024 Spirit/Boeing Memorandum of Agreement and certain other cash advances owed by Spirit to Boeing would be repaid to Boeing upon the termination of the merger agreement in certain circumstances), (ii) certain of the “bring down” standards of the representations and warranties, (iii) certain operational exceptions to the restrictions in the interim operating covenants, (iv) certain of the situations in which the Spirit termination fee and Boeing reverse termination fee would be payable, (v) the definition of “material adverse effect” and (vi) matters in respect of employee benefits and the treatment of employee equity awards.

During the week of April 21, 2024, members of management of each of Spirit and Airbus, together with their respective financial advisors, continued to review, discuss and negotiate the scope of the

64

Airbus Business and the financial terms of the Airbus Transaction. On Sunday, April 28, 2024, members of management of Spirit presented to Airbus a proposal on the scope of the Airbus Business and the valuation of the Airbus Transaction. Among other matters included in the proposal, Spirit’s proposal set forth a framework for the valuation of the Airbus Business of positive $429 million (payable to Spirit). Among other factors, Spirit’s proposal took into account the benefit of certain of the pricing, production, delivery and other matters that were previously under negotiation between Spirit and Airbus.

On Monday, April 29, 2024, representatives of Airbus sent a letter to Spirit claiming that Spirit had breached certain of its commercial contracts with Airbus relating to late deliveries and informing Spirit that Airbus intended to submit a claim to Spirit for liquidated damages. Airbus has submitted similar claims to Spirit periodically during the previous several years, and the parties would typically negotiate such claims through a Spirit operational performance improvement plan that would offset against such damages.

May 2024

Beginning on Thursday, May 2, 2024, and continuing through Friday, May 3, 2024, members of management of each of Spirit, Boeing and Airbus, together with certain of their respective legal and financial advisors, held in-person meetings in New York with Spirit and Airbus continuing discussions and negotiation of the scope of the Airbus Business and the terms and conditions of the Airbus Transaction. During the course of the discussions and negotiations, Airbus revised its framework for the valuation of the Airbus Business from approximately negative $750 million (payable to Airbus) to negative $559 million (payable to Airbus), subject to adjustments based on the final scope of the Airbus Business at the closing of the Airbus Transaction. Members of management of Airbus communicated to members of management of each of Spirit and Boeing that Airbus had proposed a substantial compromise from Airbus’s original proposal of more than $1.2 billion (payable to Airbus), that Airbus was not likely to consider any additional compromises in this regard and that Airbus’s valuation of the Airbus Business would not take into account the potential outcome of the pricing, production, delivery and other matters that were previously under negotiation between Spirit and Airbus.

On Friday, May 3, 2024, representatives of Airbus sent a letter to Spirit claiming $27 million in liquidated damages relating to late deliveries under certain of the commercial contracts between the parties during the period from October 1, 2022 through December 31, 2023.

On Friday, May 3, 2024, the Spirit Board held a meeting to further discuss and consider, among other matters, the Boeing Transaction and the Airbus Transaction, including the potential timing, status and terms thereof. Members of Spirit’s management and representatives of Morgan Stanley and Skadden were in attendance. The Spirit Board received an update on, and discussed the status of, each of the potential transactions, including through a review of the presentation materials distributed to the Spirit Board in advance of the meeting. The Spirit Board reviewed and discussed Airbus’s framework for the valuation of the Airbus Business and considered Spirit’s response thereto. In discussing Airbus’s framework for the valuation of the Airbus Business, the Spirit Board discussed and considered Airbus’s statements during the previous week, including that it would not continue to negotiate regarding potential amendments to Spirit’s contracts with Airbus and therefore, Airbus’s framework for the valuation of the Airbus Business would not take into account the potential outcome thereof. Representatives of Skadden also reviewed with the Spirit Board the current terms and conditions of the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction and the proposed term sheet for the Airbus Transaction, and the Spirit Board discussed and considered Spirit’s responses thereto. The Spirit Board also reviewed and discussed Spirit’s financial condition and prospects, which had worsened; Spirit’s outlook on its long-term value to shareholders was negatively impacted

65

by (i) the absence of contract amendments (with respect to pricing, production, delivery and other matters) that were previously under negotiation between Spirit and Airbus and (ii) Boeing’s anticipated production rates (and the related impact on Spirit’s business outlook as a supplier to Boeing) that had been communicated to Spirit by Boeing.

During the weekend of May 4, 2024, Mr. Calhoun and Mr. Johnson had a call during which Mr. Calhoun raised the need for a potential price adjustment for the Boeing Transaction given, from Boeing’s perspective, (i) Boeing’s potential obligation to pay the final proposed payment to Airbus in connection with the Airbus Transaction and (ii) following Boeing’s discussions with Spirit regarding the April 2024 Spirit/Boeing Memorandum of Agreement and Boeing’s continued financial due diligence of Spirit regarding its financial condition and prospects, Boeing’s belief that Spirit may need to incur incremental indebtedness prior to the closing of the Boeing Transaction and/or obtain additional financial accommodations, loans or advances from Boeing prior to the closing of the Boeing Transaction. Mr. Calhoun stated that Boeing was continuing to review the matter and representatives of Boeing would be in touch at a later date with specifics, but preliminarily Boeing was considering a revised pricing framework for the Boeing Transaction consisting of a merger consideration of $35.50 per share in cash, subject to upward adjustments based on, among other things, the proceeds of certain contemplated asset sales by Spirit to third parties other than Airbus prior to the closing of the Boeing Transaction (the “May 4 Preliminary Indication”). Mr. Johnson did not respond at that time.

On Monday, May 6, 2024, representatives of Skadden distributed to representatives of Davis Polk a revised draft of the proposed term sheet for the Airbus Transaction which contemplated, among other terms and conditions, (i) a rejection of the provision that required Boeing to guarantee the obligations of Spirit, (ii) that the term sheet was binding on Spirit and Airbus (with no due diligence condition to the obligations of Airbus), (iii) Spirit’s payment of $559 million to Airbus, subject to adjustments based on the final scope of the Airbus Business and certain working capital adjustments at the closing of the Airbus Transaction, (iv) refinements to the proposed scope of the Airbus Business, including the businesses, operations, personnel, intellectual property and assets and liabilities thereof, (v) a rejection of the provision that would require Spirit to indemnify Airbus for pre-closing liabilities of the Airbus Business, (vi) a rejection of the provision that would require Spirit to pay Airbus’s fees and expenses in connection with the Airbus Transaction and (vii) removal of the 60-day exclusivity period for Airbus proposed to commence on the date of the term sheet.

Thereafter and continuing throughout the week of May 6, 2024, Spirit, Boeing, Airbus and their respective advisors continued to review, discuss and negotiate the terms and conditions of the proposed term sheet for the Airbus Transaction. Throughout this period and thereafter, members of Spirit’s and Airbus’s management, together with their respective advisors, participated in numerous in-person and virtual due diligence meetings and a substantial number of materials were made available to Airbus and its advisors in a virtual data room.

Also on Monday, May 6, 2024, representatives of Skadden distributed to representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell a revised draft of the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction which generally reflected the terms and conditions negotiated between representatives of Skadden and Sullivan & Cromwell during the previous week. Certain of the material provisions that remained unresolved included (i) the amount of and the use restrictions on the reverse termination fee, (ii) whether the cash advances under the April 2024 Spirit/Boeing Memorandum of Agreement and certain other cash advances owed by Spirit to Boeing would be repaid to Boeing upon the termination of the merger agreement in certain circumstances, (iii) Spirit’s proposal of a Spirit termination fee equal to 2.5% of the equity value of Spirit (implied by the proposed merger consideration), (iii) certain of the situations in which the Spirit termination fee and Boeing reverse termination fee would be payable and (iv) matters in respect of employee benefits and the treatment of employee equity awards.

66

On Tuesday, May 7, 2024, the Spirit Board held a meeting to further discuss and consider, among other matters, the Boeing Transaction and the Airbus Transaction, including the potential timing, status and terms thereof. Members of Spirit’s management and representatives of Morgan Stanley and Skadden were in attendance. The Spirit Board received an update on, and discussed the status of, each of the potential transactions, including, with respect to the Boeing Transaction, the May 4 Preliminary Indication and Boeing’s stated reasons for the May 4 Preliminary Indication as communicated by Boeing to Spirit. The Spirit Board also reviewed and discussed Spirit’s financial condition and prospects, including potential solutions to address Spirit’s liquidity position. Following discussion and consideration, the Spirit Board determined that Spirit should seek to accelerate the negotiations with each of Boeing and Airbus, seek to finalize the transactions on the terms discussed with the Spirit Board, and to do so with a view toward not having Boeing seek to renegotiate for a reduction to the previously proposed $40.00 per share in cash merger consideration for the Boeing Transaction. The Spirit Board also instructed Mr. Johnson to communicate to Mr. Calhoun that the delays in finalizing the transactions (and Boeing seeking to renegotiate the previously proposed $40.00 per share in cash merger consideration) were putting the Boeing Transaction at risk.

On Wednesday, May 8, 2024, in connection with the Boeing Board’s ongoing search for a successor to Mr. Calhoun, Steven M. Mollenkopf, Chair of the Boeing Board, asked Mr. Shanahan, who had previously served in multiple leadership roles at Boeing, if he would be interested in being considered as a candidate for the role of Boeing’s President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Shanahan responded that he would not rule out being considered for the role. Prior to such conversation, the Boeing Board had discussed Mr. Shanahan as one of a number of qualified candidates for consideration for such role. Shortly after the conversation, Mr. Shanahan notified Mr. Johnson and Ms. Esteves of the outreach from Mr. Mollenkopf and Mr. Shanahan’s response thereto, and Mr. Johnson and Ms. Esteves subsequently provided the same update to other members of the Spirit Board. After weighing the risks of potential or actual conflicts of interest that could arise from Mr. Shanahan’s participation in discussions and negotiations with Boeing on behalf of Spirit in respect of the Boeing Transaction while he was under consideration for employment by Boeing in a leadership role, on the one hand, and the continued benefit to Spirit and its stockholders of Mr. Shanahan’s continued involvement in the discussions and negotiations with Boeing in respect of the Boeing Transaction, on the other hand, the directors determined, with agreement from Mr. Shanahan, that Mr. Johnson and Ms. Esteves would continue to lead the discussions and negotiations with Boeing regarding the Boeing Transaction, with Mr. Shanahan providing his input and viewpoint as requested by Mr. Johnson and Ms. Esteves. After consideration of a number of qualified candidates, the Boeing Board ultimately selected Robert K. Ortberg to serve as President and Chief Executive Officer of Boeing, based on the experience and qualifications described in the section entitled “Board of Directors and Management of Boeing Following Completion of the Merger” beginning on page 108 of this proxy statement/prospectus.

On Sunday, May 12, 2024, representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell distributed to representatives of Skadden a bullet-point summary of Boeing’s revised proposal for the merger consideration (the “May 12 Non-Binding Proposal”). The May 12 Non-Binding Proposal included proposed adjustments to the per share merger consideration based on (i) (as an increase) the proceeds from the sale of Spirit’s operations in Prestwick, Scotland that support Airbus programs (the “Prestwick Business”) to a third party other than Airbus prior to the closing of the Boeing Transaction and (ii) (as a decrease) any new third-party debt incurred by Spirit after the signing of the merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction and the amount of any advances made by Boeing to Spirit under the April 2024 Spirit/Boeing Memorandum of Agreement or after the signing of the Boeing Transaction that remained outstanding at the closing of the Boeing Transaction. Members of Boeing’s management communicated to members of Spirit’s management Boeing’s rationale for the May 12 Non-Binding Proposal, being that, following the recent negotiations with Airbus, Boeing was not willing to pay to Airbus the purchase price for the Airbus Transaction that had been proposed by Airbus, and that if Spirit needed to incur new indebtedness to fund the Airbus Transaction, such indebtedness would serve to reduce the per share merger consideration for the Boeing Transaction. The May 12 Non-Binding Proposal did not include a “hard floor” per share merger consideration for the Boeing

67

Transaction (i.e., the potential downward adjustment to the per share merger consideration for the Boeing Transaction was uncapped). The May 12 Non-Binding Proposal also did not include or reference the amount of the merger consideration.

On Monday, May 13, 2024, representatives of Davis Polk distributed to the representatives of Skadden and Sullivan & Cromwell a revised version of the proposed term sheet for the Airbus Transaction, which contemplated, among other terms and conditions, (i) a “keep well” arrangement in favor of Spirit that would be put in place at the closing of the Airbus Transaction (instead of the guarantee), (ii) further refinements to the proposed scope of the Airbus Business, including the businesses, operations, personnel, intellectual property, assets and liabilities thereof, (iii) an acceptance of the removal of the 60-day exclusivity period for Airbus, (iv) an acceptance that the parties’ obligation to negotiate in good faith the definitive agreements for the Airbus Transaction based on the term sheet is binding and (iv) a variety of other terms and conditions that remained bracketed pending the progression of Airbus’s due diligence of the Airbus Business.

Beginning on Tuesday, May 14, 2024, and continuing through Thursday, May 16, 2024, members of management of each of Spirit, Boeing and Airbus, together with their respective legal and financial advisors, held in-person meetings in New York with the parties reviewing, discussing and negotiating the scope of the Airbus Business and the terms and conditions of the Airbus Transaction. At the conclusion of the meetings, the material provisions that remained unresolved included the guarantee/keep-well arrangement, the allocation of intellectual property, the allocation of pre-closing liabilities and related indemnification obligations and the responsibility for pension obligations.

On Friday, May 17, 2024, the Spirit Board held a meeting to further discuss and consider, among other matters, the Boeing Transaction and the Airbus Transaction, including the potential timing, status and terms thereof, and to review and consider additional financial valuation analysis materials from Morgan Stanley. Members of Spirit’s management and representatives of Morgan Stanley and Skadden were in attendance. The Spirit Board received an update on, and discussed the status of, each of the potential transactions. Regarding the Boeing Transaction, the Spirit Board reviewed and discussed the May 4 Preliminary Indication, Boeing’s stated reasons for the May 4 Preliminary Indication as communicated by Boeing to Spirit and the May 12 Non-Binding Proposal. Among other matters, the Spirit Board weighed the risks, opportunities and considerations in responding to the May 4 Preliminary Indication and the May 12 Non-Binding Proposal. In this regard, the Spirit Board continued to discuss Spirit’s financial condition and prospects, which had worsened, and weighed the May 4 Preliminary Indication and the May 12 Non-Binding Proposal against Spirit’s long-term value and prospects. Following discussion, the Spirit Board determined that Spirit should seek to accelerate the negotiations with each of Boeing and Airbus, and seek to finalize the transactions on the terms discussed with the Spirit Board, which did not include an acceptance in any respect of the May 4 Preliminary Indication or the May 12 Non-Binding Proposal or any change to the per share merger consideration. Next, the Spirit Board reviewed the work that had been undertaken to update and refine Spirit’s standalone strategic plan, to take into account, among other factors, updated information regarding pricing, rates and margin with respect to Spirit’s businesses with Boeing and Airbus. Representatives of Morgan Stanley then reviewed with the Spirit Board an updated preliminary financial analysis, including a review of Spirit’s updated standalone strategic plan and the assumptions, projections and sensitivities thereto. As part of the Spirit Board’s continued review and discussion of Spirit’s financial condition and prospects, the Spirit Board had previously instructed members of management of Spirit to discuss with representatives of Morgan Stanley potential loan or other liquidity solutions and, at the meeting, the Spirit Board reviewed and considered the proposed terms and conditions of the potential $350 million bridge loan facility to be provided by Morgan Stanley (the “Morgan Stanley Bridge Facility”) that had been distributed to the Spirit Board in advance of the meeting. Following further discussion and consideration, the Spirit Board authorized the negotiation of the definitive documentation for the Morgan Stanley Bridge Facility. In light of the

68

potential conflict that the Morgan Stanley Bridge Facility posed, the Spirit Board determined that it would be prudent to retain an additional financial advisor to the Spirit Board in addition to Morgan Stanley. Accordingly, after the meeting, the Spirit Board instructed members of Spirit’s management to contact representatives of Moelis, who had previously acted as a financial advisor to Spirit on various matters, to act as financial advisor to Spirit and the Spirit Board in connection with the consideration of the Boeing Transaction and to be the institution to provide a fairness opinion to the Spirit Board were the Boeing Transaction to proceed. Moelis began its engagement shortly thereafter.

On Saturday, May 18, 2024, representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell distributed to representatives of Skadden a revised draft of the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction which contemplated, among other terms and conditions, (i) the inclusion of provisions implementing the May 12 Non-Binding Proposal and a footnote indicating that Boeing would be proposing a new price per share for the merger consideration (collectively in this clause (i), the “May 18 Non-Binding Proposal”), (ii) Boeing’s acceptance of the Spirit termination fee of 2.5% of equity value subject to Spirit’s agreement that the Boeing reverse termination fee is 5% of equity value (in each case, based on the revised per share merger consideration) and Boeing’s acceptance that there are no use restrictions on the reverse termination fee (save for the repayment of any then-outstanding advances owed by Spirit to Boeing) and (iii) Boeing’s continued rejection of Spirit’s proposals regarding employee benefits and the treatment of employee equity awards.

During the weeks of May 19, 2024 and May 26, 2024, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Calhoun periodically communicated to discuss the status and timing of both the Boeing Transaction and the Airbus Transaction. Mr. Calhoun reiterated Boeing’s continued interest in the Boeing Transaction.

Also during the weeks of May 19, 2024 and May 26, 2024, members of management of each of Spirit, Boeing and Airbus, together with their respective legal and financial advisors, continued to discuss and negotiate the scope of the Airbus Business and the terms and conditions of the Airbus Transaction. Throughout this period, members of management of each of Spirit, Boeing and Airbus, together with their respective advisors, participated in a substantial number of virtual due diligence meetings and a substantial number of materials were made available to Boeing and Airbus and their respective advisors. On Tuesday, May 28, 2024 and Friday, May 31, 2024, the parties exchanged various drafts of the proposed term sheet for the Airbus Transaction which generally reflected the terms and conditions negotiated between the parties over the previous two weeks. Certain of the material provisions that remained unresolved included those with respect to the allocation of intellectual property, matters with respect to employees, employee transfers and pensions and Airbus’s due diligence condition prior to entering into definitive agreements for the Airbus Transaction.

On Friday, May 31, 2024, the Spirit Board held a meeting to further discuss and consider, among other matters, the Boeing Transaction and the Airbus Transaction, including the potential timing, status and terms thereof. Members of Spirit’s management and representatives of Skadden and Morgan Stanley reviewed with the Spirit Board the terms and conditions most recently proposed by each of Airbus (in respect of the term sheet for the Airbus Transaction) and Boeing (in respect of the merger agreement and disclosure schedules for the Boeing Transaction). Following discussion and consideration, the Spirit Board determined that Spirit should seek to finalize the negotiations with each of Airbus and Boeing on the terms discussed with the Spirit Board, including rejection of the May 18 Non-Binding Proposal.

June 2024

Throughout the month of June 2024, members of management of each of Spirit, Boeing and Airbus, together with their respective legal and financial advisors, exchanged numerous drafts of the proposed term sheet for the Airbus Transaction and held numerous negotiation and diligence sessions regarding

69

the Airbus Business. The parties exchanged drafts of the proposed term sheet for the Airbus Transaction on Saturday, June 1, 2024, Tuesday, June 4, 2024, Monday, June 10, 2024, Wednesday, June 12, 2024, Friday, June 14, 2024, Monday, June 17, 2024, Wednesday, June 19, 2024, Thursday, June 20, 2024, Wednesday, June 26, 2024, and Friday, June 28, 2024. In addition, throughout the month of June, members of management of each of Spirit and Airbus, together with their respective legal advisors, discussed and negotiated the terms and conditions of the proposed commercial memorandum of understanding to be entered into between Spirit and Airbus providing for, among other things, and in each case in respect of certain of Spirit’s commercial arrangements with Airbus, a financial support package from Airbus to Spirit, an acceleration of the payment from Airbus to Spirit in respect of certain non-recurring costs to be incurred by Spirit and a non-interest bearing forgivable line of credit made available by Airbus to Spirit (the “June 2024 Spirit/Airbus Memorandum of Understanding”).

On Tuesday, June 4, 2024, Mark J. Suchinski stepped down as Spirit’s Chief Financial Officer to pursue another opportunity, and Ms. Esteves was appointed as Spirit’s Chief Financial Officer.

On Wednesday, June 5, 2024, representatives of Skadden distributed to representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell a revised draft of the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction which contemplated, among other terms, (i) the rejection of the terms implementing the May 18 Non-Binding Proposal, (ii) the re-inclusion of the $300 million Boeing reverse termination fee, (iii) the inclusion of an “Expanded Divestiture Perimeter” to permit Spirit to divest Spirit’s operations in Belfast, Northern Ireland (other than the operations that are part of the Airbus Business) and Subang, Malaysia, the Prestwick Business and Spirit’s wholly owned subsidiary, Fiber Materials, Inc. (in all cases without any adjustment to the per share merger consideration in the Boeing Transaction), (iv) the inclusion of a provision requiring Boeing to implement an arrangement to enable Spirit to pay the final consideration to Airbus under the definitive agreements for the Airbus Transaction and (v) the re-inclusion of Spirit’s position on employee benefits matters and the treatment of employee equity awards.

Shortly thereafter, beginning on Thursday, June 6, 2024 and continuing through Saturday, June 8, 2024, Mr. Calhoun contacted Mr. Johnson, and members of management of Boeing contacted Mr. Shanahan and Ms. Esteves, to discuss the May 18 Non-Binding Proposal. As communicated by the representatives of Boeing, Boeing was not willing to bear the risk of the final payments to Airbus for the Airbus Transaction (which would include the agreed-upon purchase price, the repayment of any loans or advances to Airbus, the satisfaction (by payment to Airbus) of any amounts owed to Airbus under commercial contracts for liquidated damages and the potential further increase to the purchase price payable to Airbus for certain pension obligations assumed by Airbus). During these discussions, the representatives of Boeing indicated that Boeing would be prepared to pay $35.50 per share in cash for the Boeing Transaction, subject to a per share adjustment based on (i) (as an increase) the proceeds in a sale to a third party (other than Airbus) of the Prestwick Business and (ii) (as a decrease) the amount of (a) any new third-party debt incurred by Spirit after the signing of the merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction, (b) the then-outstanding amount of any advances by Boeing to Spirit at the closing of the Boeing Transaction, and (c) any contractual liquidated damages and loan or cash advance repayment obligations, in each case, payable by Spirit to Airbus on or after signing and at or prior to the closing of the Boeing Transaction (or payable after the closing of the Boeing Transaction in respect of pre-closing conduct) (the “June 8 Non-Binding Proposal”).

On Sunday, June 9, 2024, the Spirit Board held a meeting to further discuss and consider, among other matters, the Boeing Transaction and the Airbus Transaction, including the potential timing, status and terms thereof. Members of Spirit’s management and representatives of Skadden and Morgan Stanley were in attendance and reviewed with the Spirit Board the June 8 Non-Binding Proposal. Representatives of Skadden reviewed with the Spirit Board the Spirit Board’s fiduciary duties and process considerations in connection with the Spirit Board’s review and consideration thereof. Following further discussion and consideration, including as to the status of Spirit’s

70

negotiations with Airbus for the Airbus Transaction and Spirit’s financial condition and prospects, which had been worsening, the Spirit Board determined that it was in the best interests of Spirit and Spirit Stockholders to continue to engage with Boeing based on the June 8 Non-Binding Proposal, provided that Spirit should (i) obtain Boeing’s agreement that a “hard floor” per share merger consideration for the Boeing Transaction will be set at $35.50 per share (i.e., in no event would any adjustment cause the per share merger consideration to be less than $35.50), (ii) obtain a commitment from Boeing in the merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction that Boeing will fund the final payment to Airbus for the Airbus Transaction regardless of what it might be and (iii) negotiate for the Expanded Divestiture Perimeter and other adjustments that provide Spirit with a path to increase the merger consideration from $35.50 per share in cash.

Later in the day on Sunday, June 9, 2024, representatives of Skadden distributed to representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell a revised draft of the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction which contemplated (i) a base merger consideration of $35.50 per share in cash, which would serve as a “hard floor” and (ii) a potential upward adjustment to the per share merger consideration based on the proceeds in a sale to a third party (other than Airbus) of the Prestwick Business, subject to a “hard cap” of $40.00 per share in cash.

Thereafter, during the week of June 9, 2024, members of management of each of Boeing and Spirit, together with their respective advisors, participated in a substantial number of negotiations and discussions regarding Spirit’s draft of the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction, dated June 9, 2024 and the June 8 Non-Binding Proposal. The representatives of Boeing continued to impress upon Spirit that Boeing was not willing to bear the risk of the final payments to Airbus for the Airbus Transaction (i.e., that Boeing was not willing to accept a “hard floor” for the per share merger consideration and that the downward adjustment would be uncapped). The representatives of Spirit provided further diligence information to the representatives of Boeing relating to the current and anticipated loans, advances and liquidated damages that might be owed to Airbus.

On Friday, June 14, 2024, the Spirit Board held a meeting to further discuss and consider, among other matters, Spirit’s financial condition and prospects, the Boeing Transaction and the Airbus Transaction, including the potential timing, status and terms thereof. Members of Spirit’s management and representatives of Skadden, Morgan Stanley and Moelis were in attendance. The Spirit Board received an update on Spirit’s financial condition and prospects from Spirit’s management. The Spirit Board also received an update on, and a summary of, the negotiations with Airbus and Boeing during the previous week. As part of the review, the Spirit Board discussed and considered the June 8 Non-Binding Proposal (as supplemented and refined by representatives of Boeing during the most recent discussions) to determine an appropriate response. Following discussion, it was determined that Spirit would respond with: (i) (a) a base per share merger consideration for the Boeing Transaction of $35.50 per share in cash, which would serve as a “hard floor” and (b) a potential upward adjustment to the per share merger consideration based on the proceeds in a sale to a third party (other than Airbus) of the Prestwick Business, subject to (I) an offset for any new contractual liquidated damages arising after the signing of the merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction and loans or advances made by Airbus to Spirit after the signing of the merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction and outstanding at the closing of the Airbus Transaction and (II) a “hard cap” of $40.00 per share in cash and (ii) Boeing committing in the merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction to fund Spirit with sufficient cash to pay the final payment to Airbus for the Airbus Transaction (the “June 14 Non-Binding Response”). The Spirit Board believed that while the June 14 Non-Binding Response narrowed the path for the per share merger consideration to increase from $35.50, it provided Spirit Stockholders with certainty on price (within a range) and more certainty of the closing of the Boeing Transaction. Following further discussion and consideration, the Spirit Board determined that it was in the best interests of Spirit and Spirit Stockholders to continue to engage with Boeing based on the June 14 Non-Binding Response. Finally, Moelis reviewed with the Spirit Board the work Moelis had done to

71

date in its preparation of its financial analysis with respect to Spirit and the Boeing Transaction based on Spirit’s standalone financial plan and Moelis was instructed by the Spirit Board to use the “base” plan in Spirit’s standalone financial plan for purposes of its financial analysis of the Boeing Transaction, which plan the Spirit Board believed provided the best estimate of Spirit’s outlook and future performance.

On Saturday, June 15, 2024, representatives of Skadden distributed to representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell a revised draft of the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction to supplement Skadden’s previous draft of Sunday, June 9, 2024, and which (i) implemented the June 14 Non-Binding Response and (ii) revised the Spirit termination fee to $113 million (being approximately 2.5% of equity value based on a per share merger consideration of $35.50). Members of management of each of Boeing and Spirit continued to have discussions on Saturday, June 15, 2024 and Sunday, June 16, 2024 and preliminarily aligned on (a) the base share merger consideration for the Boeing Transaction of $35.50 per share in cash, which would serve as a “hard floor,” potential upward adjustment to the per share merger consideration based on the proceeds in a sale to a third party (other than Airbus) of the Prestwick Business, subject to (I) among others, an offset for the amount of any contractual liquidated damages and loan or cash advance repayment obligations, in each case, payable by Spirit to Airbus on or after signing and at or prior to the closing of the Boeing Transaction (or payable after the closing of the Boeing Transaction in respect of pre-closing conduct) and (II) a “hard cap” of $40.00 per share in cash, and (b) a $300 million reverse termination fee. Other downward adjustments to the per share merger consideration were proposed by Boeing, but remained open following the conclusion of such discussions.

On Sunday, June 16, 2024, representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell distributed to representatives of Skadden a revised draft of the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction which contemplated, among other terms and conditions, (i) a general acceptance of the June 14 Non-Binding Response, except that the amount of (a) any liquidated damages and repayments of loans or advances paid by Spirit to Airbus on or after signing and at or prior to closing of the Boeing Transaction (or payable after the closing of the Boeing Transaction in respect of pre-closing conduct), (b) the excess of the cash amount to be paid by Spirit to Airbus for the Airbus Transaction over the proceeds from the Expanded Divestiture Perimeter, (c) any new (after the signing of the merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction) indebtedness for borrowed money incurred by Spirit and (d) any advances under the April 2024 Spirit/Boeing Memorandum of Agreement due and payable as of the closing of the Boeing Transaction would each be a further offset to the potential upward adjustment, if any, to the per share merger consideration based on the proceeds in a sale to a third party (other than Airbus) of the Prestwick Business, (ii) an acceptance of the Boeing $300 million reverse termination fee and a change to the Spirit termination fee to $150 million (from $113 million as previously proposed by Spirit), (iii) the continued rejection of Spirit’s proposal on matters in respect of employee benefits and the treatment of employee equity awards and (iv) amendments to the timing, terms and process under which Spirit would be permitted to pursue divestiture of the Expanded Divestiture Perimeter.

Thereafter, during the week of June 16, 2024, members of management of each of Spirit and Boeing, together with their respective legal and financial advisors, made substantial progress in negotiating the terms and conditions of the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction. During this same period, members of management of each of Spirit, Boeing and Airbus, together with their respective legal and financial advisors, made substantial progress in finalizing the terms and conditions of the proposed term sheet for the Airbus Transaction, and the parties began to discuss the specific plan and process for the signing of the agreements for the potential transactions, which was targeted for the end of the week subject to each party’s continued review and consideration (and, in the case of Spirit, the review and consideration of the Spirit Board).

On June 17, 2024, representatives of Spirit contacted representatives of Boeing and requested additional financial accommodations from Boeing to support Spirit’s operations, Boeing programs and

72

financial condition. From June 17, 2024 through Thursday, June 20, 2024, members of management of each of Spirit and Boeing discussed and negotiated a proposed amendment to the April 2024 Spirit/Boeing Memorandum of Agreement to provide for a loan of up to $40 million and to revise the repayment schedule under the April 2024 Spirit/Boeing Memorandum of Agreement. On Thursday, June 20, 2024, Boeing and Spirit entered into Amendment No. 1 to the April 2024 Spirit/Boeing Memorandum of Agreement, providing for Boeing to loan Spirit an additional $40 million (incremental to the $425 million previously advanced) on June 21, 2024 and defer repayment of $36.6 million due to Boeing on June 12, 2024, in accordance with the terms of the April 2024 Spirit/Boeing Memorandum of Agreement.

On Friday, June 21, 2024, Mr. Calhoun contacted Mr. Johnson to inform Spirit that, following further review by the Boeing Board, Boeing was no longer prepared to pay cash consideration for the Boeing Transaction. Rather, Boeing would propose as the per share merger consideration: (i) if the Prestwick Business is sold to Airbus, $37.00 per share, payable in Boeing Common Stock or (ii) if the Prestwick Business is sold to a third party, $36.50 per share, payable in Boeing Common Stock, plus a number of shares of Boeing Common Stock based on the proceeds in a sale to a third party (other than Airbus) of the Prestwick Business. In each case, the per share merger consideration would be subject to an exchange ratio collar of 0.18x-0.25x, equivalent to an approximately 16% collar around $176.56, a recent trading price of the Boeing Common Stock (the foregoing in this paragraph, the “June 21 Non-Binding Proposal”). During that discussion, and in subsequent discussions shortly thereafter between members of Boeing and Spirit management, representatives of Boeing stated that Boeing was no longer willing to pay cash consideration for the Boeing Transaction because of, among other reasons, Boeing’s focus on maintaining its investment grade credit rating and Boeing’s view of Spirit’s financial condition and prospects, which included Boeing’s belief that, prior to the closing of the Boeing Transaction, Spirit may need to incur incremental indebtedness (including under the Morgan Stanley Bridge Facility) and/or obtain additional financial accommodations, loans or advances from Boeing or Airbus. Members of Boeing management also stated that, if Spirit was willing to proceed on the basis of the June 21 Non-Binding Proposal, Boeing was prepared to sign the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction as soon as possible, targeting for a signing within one week.

On Sunday, June 23, 2024, the Spirit Board held a meeting to further discuss and consider, among other matters, Spirit’s financial condition and prospects, the Boeing Transaction and the Airbus Transaction, including the potential timing, status and terms thereof. Members of Spirit’s management and representatives of Skadden, Morgan Stanley and Moelis were in attendance. Before Mr. Shanahan joined the meeting, the Spirit Board met in executive session to discuss Boeing’s outreach to Mr. Shanahan about being considered for the role of Boeing’s President and Chief Executive Officer. Among other matters discussed and considered, the directors discussed the importance of the Spirit Board’s continued oversight of that matter and the negotiations for the Boeing Transaction more generally, and the continued process by which the Spirit Board would maintain such oversight. The Spirit Board received, discussed and considered the June 21 Non-Binding Proposal (which had been communicated to the Spirit Board in advance of the meeting) and received further information and analysis from members of Spirit’s management (including a summary of the communications with members of Boeing’s management since the June 21 Non-Binding Proposal was made) and the representatives of Skadden (with respect to fiduciary and legal matters) and Morgan Stanley and Moelis (with respect to financial matters). Among other matters, the Spirit Board weighed the risks, opportunities and considerations in responding to the June 21 Non-Binding Proposal, including the prospect of discontinuing negotiations with Boeing and continuing to operate as a standalone independent company or pursue other strategic and financial alternatives. In this regard, the Spirit Board continued to discuss Spirit’s financial condition and prospects, which had worsened, and weighed the June 21 Non-Binding Proposal against Spirit’s other strategic and financial alternatives, which the Spirit Board viewed as limited, uncertain and not more favorable than

73

the June 21 Non-Binding Proposal. Following further discussion and consideration, the Spirit Board determined that it was in the best interests of Spirit and Spirit Stockholders to continue to engage with Boeing on the basis of the June 21 Non-Binding Proposal. The Spirit Board instructed Mr. Shanahan and Ms. Esteves to engage with Boeing to seek to improve the June 21 Non-Binding Proposal to $38.00 per share in Boeing Common Stock (not subject to any adjustments, other than based on the exchange ratio and collar) and, in doing so, to condition any proposed acceptance of the June 21 Non-Binding Proposal by Spirit on (i) Boeing’s acceptance of Spirit’s most recent positions on the other terms and conditions in the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction, including Spirit’s ability to borrow under the potential Morgan Stanley Bridge Facility between the signing and the closing of the Boeing Transaction (without adjustment to the per share merger consideration for the Boeing Transaction) and Spirit’s proposal for a retention pool designed to incentivize and retain employees during the pendency of the Boeing Transaction and (ii) Boeing’s acceptance of the remaining unresolved terms in the proposed term sheet for the Airbus Transaction. Representatives of Spirit’s legal and financial advisors provided the Spirit Board with a summary of the intended plan for a due diligence review of Boeing and its businesses and operations in light of the merger consideration in the Boeing Transaction having changed to include Boeing Common Stock.

Shortly after the meeting, Ms. Esteves and Mr. Shanahan contacted members of Boeing’s management to respond to the June 21 Non-Binding Proposal consistent with the direction from the Spirit Board at the meeting. Discussions and negotiations continued between the parties from Monday, June 24, 2024 to Wednesday, June 26, 2024, during which Boeing generally rejected any proposed revisions to the June 21 Non-Binding Proposal.

On Monday, June 24, 2024, and Tuesday, June 25, 2024, members of management of each of Spirit and Boeing, together with their respective advisors, held in-person and virtual due diligence sessions regarding Boeing and its businesses and operations. In addition, representatives of Skadden conducted legal due diligence and representatives of Morgan Stanley and Moelis conducted financial due diligence, in each case on Boeing and its businesses and operations during such period and thereafter.

Throughout the week of June 24, 2024, members of management of each of Spirit, Boeing and Airbus, together with their respective legal advisors, negotiated the final terms and conditions of the proposed term sheet for the Airbus Transaction, exchanged numerous drafts of the proposed term sheet for the Airbus Transaction, and finalized the terms and conditions of the proposed term sheet for the Airbus Transaction for each party’s final review and consideration (and, in the case of Spirit, the final review and consideration of the Spirit Board).

On Tuesday, June 25, 2024, the Boeing Board, which had repeatedly discussed and been briefed on the Boeing Transaction over the prior months both as a full board and through its finance committee, met to discuss, among other matters, the Boeing Transaction, including the status and potential terms and timing thereof. Members of Boeing’s management and representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell and PJT Partners were in attendance, and reviewed the June 21 Non-Binding Proposal. Following discussion, the Boeing Board indicated that it was supportive of Boeing’s proposal to Spirit of a merger consideration of $37.00 per share payable in Boeing Common Stock, subject to an exchange ratio collar of 0.18x - 0.25x, with a targeted announcement of the Boeing Transaction as early as July 1, 2024, subject to the final approval of the Boeing Board.

On Wednesday, June 26, 2024, following negotiations with representatives of Spirit who sought to increase the merger consideration to $38.00 per share in Boeing Common Stock, representatives of Boeing stated that Boeing would be prepared to revise the merger consideration included in the June 21 Non-Binding Proposal to $37.25 per share in Boeing Common Stock (not subject to any adjustments, other than based on the exchange ratio and collar) and would accept Spirit’s proposals

74

regarding its ability to borrow under the Morgan Stanley Bridge Facility, its ability to pursue the divestiture of the Expanded Divestiture Perimeter, the retention pool and the remaining unresolved terms in the proposed term sheet for the Airbus Transaction (the “June 26 Non-Binding Proposal”). The representatives of Boeing also stated that, pending final internal review and approval, Boeing would be prepared to enter into the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction on Sunday, June 30, 2024 and announce the Boeing Transaction on July 1, 2024.

On Thursday, June 27, 2024, the Spirit Board held a meeting to further discuss and consider, among other matters, Spirit’s financial condition and prospects, the Boeing Transaction and the Airbus Transaction, including the potential timing, status and terms thereof. Members of Spirit’s management and representatives of Skadden, Morgan Stanley and Moelis were in attendance. The Spirit Board received, discussed and considered the June 26 Non-Binding Proposal and received further information and analysis from members of Spirit management (including a summary of the communications with members of Boeing management) and the representatives of Skadden (with respect to fiduciary and legal matters) and Moelis (with respect to financial matters). Following further discussion and consideration, the Spirit Board authorized and instructed Spirit’s senior management, together with Skadden, to continue to negotiate proposed final transaction documents on the basis discussed with the Spirit Board.

Thereafter, members of management of each of Spirit and Boeing, together with their respective legal advisors, continued to negotiate the terms and conditions of the proposed merger agreement and disclosure schedules for the Boeing Transaction consistent with the June 26 Non-Binding Proposal, and exchanged several drafts of the proposed merger agreement and disclosure schedules.

On Friday, June 28, 2024, the Spirit Board held a meeting to discuss and consider the Boeing Transaction, the Airbus Transaction, the June 2024 Spirit/Airbus Memorandum of Understanding and the Morgan Stanley Bridge Facility. Representatives of Skadden, Morgan Stanley and Moelis were in attendance. Representatives of Skadden updated the Spirit Board on the substantially final terms of the proposed merger agreement (including all exhibits and annexes) and disclosure schedules for the Boeing Transaction and the substantially final terms of the proposed term sheet for the Airbus Transaction and reported that the negotiations were substantially complete and the transaction documents were in substantially final form. Representatives of Skadden also reviewed with the Spirit Board the Spirit Board’s fiduciary duties and Moelis’s relationship disclosures, which had been previously provided to the Spirit Board, of its prior engagements by Spirit, Boeing and Airbus. Representatives of Moelis then reviewed and discussed with the Spirit Board Moelis’s financial analysis with respect to Spirit and the Boeing Transaction. The Spirit Board then engaged in a discussion regarding various aspects of the potential transactions, including the factors described under the section entitled “The Merger—Recommendation of the Spirit Board and Its Reasons for the Merger” beginning on page 80 of this proxy statement/prospectus. Following further discussion and consideration, the Spirit Board authorized and instructed Spirit’s senior management, together with Skadden, to negotiate proposed final transaction documents on the basis discussed with the Spirit Board.

Thereafter, members of management of each of Spirit and Boeing, together with their respective legal advisors, negotiated the final terms and conditions of the proposed merger agreement and disclosure schedules for the Boeing Transaction consistent with discussions with the Spirit Board, exchanged several drafts of the merger agreement and disclosure schedules, and finalized the terms and conditions of the proposed merger agreement and disclosure schedules for each party’s final review and consideration (and, in the case of Spirit, the final review and consideration of the Spirit Board).

On Sunday, June 30, 2024, the Spirit Board held a meeting to discuss and consider the Boeing Transaction, the Airbus Transaction, the June 2024 Spirit/Airbus Memorandum of Understanding and

75

the Morgan Stanley Bridge Facility. Representatives of Skadden, Morgan Stanley and Moelis were in attendance. Representatives of Skadden updated the Spirit Board on the final terms and conditions of the merger agreement (including all exhibits and annexes) and disclosure schedules for the Boeing Transaction, the final terms and conditions of the proposed term sheet for the Airbus Transaction and the June 2024 Spirit/Airbus Memorandum of Understanding and the final terms and conditions of the proposed definitive agreements for the Morgan Stanley Bridge Facility and reported that the negotiations were complete and the transaction documents were in proposed final form. Representatives of Skadden also reviewed the Spirit Board’s fiduciary duties with the Spirit Board. Representatives of Moelis confirmed that the financial analysis presented to the Spirit Board at the previous meeting of the Spirit Board had not materially changed and subsequently delivered an oral opinion, which was confirmed by delivery of a written opinion, dated June 30, 2024, addressed to the Spirit Board, to the effect that, as of such date and based upon and subject to the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and other limitations set forth in the written opinion, the Per Share Merger Consideration to be received by holders of Spirit Common Stock (other than Excluded Shares) pursuant to the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders. See the section entitled “The Merger—Opinion of Moelis & Company LLC, Financial Advisor to Spirit” beginning on page 88 of this proxy statement/prospectus. The Spirit Board then engaged in a discussion regarding various aspects of the potential transactions, including the factors described under the section entitled “The Merger—Recommendation of the Spirit Board and Its Reasons for the Merger” beginning on page 80 of this proxy statement/prospectus. Following this discussion, the Spirit Board unanimously approved the proposed merger agreement (including all exhibits and annexes) and disclosure schedules for the Boeing Transaction and the transactions contemplated thereby, and recommended the approval and adoption by Spirit Stockholders of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. The Spirit Board also unanimously approved the term sheet for the Airbus Transaction, the June 2024 Spirit/Airbus Memorandum of Understanding and the definitive documents for the Morgan Stanley Bridge Facility.

Also on Sunday, June 30, 2024, the Boeing Board held a meeting to discuss and consider the Boeing Transaction. Members of Boeing management and representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell and PJT Partners were in attendance. Members of Boeing management and Boeing representatives updated the Boeing Board on the final terms and conditions of the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction, and reported that the negotiations were complete and the transaction documents were in proposed final form. The Boeing Board then engaged in a discussion regarding various aspects of the Boeing Transaction, including the factors described under the section entitled “The Merger—Boeing’s Reasons for the Merger” beginning on page 78 of this proxy statement/prospectus. Following this discussion, the Boeing Board unanimously approved the proposed merger agreement for the Boeing Transaction and the transactions contemplated thereby.

In the afternoon (Eastern Time) on Sunday, June 30, 2024, Spirit and Boeing executed the Merger Agreement and Spirit and Airbus executed the Airbus Term Sheet and the June 2024 Spirit/Airbus Memorandum of Understanding (with an effective date of June 28, 2024). Also in the afternoon (Eastern Time) on Sunday, June 30, 2024, Spirit and affiliates of Morgan Stanley entered into the definitive documents for the Morgan Stanley Bridge Facility. The Boeing Transaction and the Airbus Transaction were announced on Monday, July 1, 2024, before the opening of the financial markets in New York and Europe.

76

July 2024 - November 2024

Following the execution of the Merger Agreement, Spirit and Boeing began to work toward the closing of the Boeing Transaction. As of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, that work remains ongoing. Following the execution of the Airbus Term Sheet, Spirit, Airbus and Boeing began negotiations for the definitive agreements to document the transactions contemplated by the Airbus Term Sheet and to work toward the closing of the Airbus Transaction. As of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, such negotiations and work remain ongoing.

On Tuesday, July 30, 2024, Robert K. “Kelly” Ortberg was appointed as Boeing’s President and Chief Executive Officer and as a member of the Boeing Board, effective as of August 8, 2024.

Beginning on Friday, September 20, 2024 and throughout the remainder of September and October 2024, Spirit and Boeing discussed Spirit’s liquidity needs for the next twelve months and the potential options for meeting these needs in the near and longer term. These options included Spirit’s proposal that Boeing provide for Spirit’s needs directly through a combination of extending existing advance repayment dates and providing additional financing (the “Requested Boeing Financial Support Package”), and Spirit seeking out additional liquidity from the debt markets (the “Potential Financing”). Beginning in early October 2024, members of Spirit’s management held discussions with Morgan Stanley regarding the prospects of the Potential Financing. Boeing and Spirit disagreed over whether Boeing’s withholding consent to Spirit’s taking on additional debt without adjustment to the Per Share Merger Consideration would be “reasonable” under the terms of the Merger Agreement. On Thursday, October 24, 2024, Boeing proposed to approve Spirit’s moving forward with the Potential Financing (the “Financing Consent”) if Spirit would agree to expedited binding arbitration to determine whether Boeing withholding its approval of the Potential Financing would have been “unreasonable” (and thus in contravention of the Merger Agreement) or “reasonable” (and thus in compliance with the Merger Agreement). Boeing further proposed that if it were determined in the arbitration that it would have been “unreasonable” for Boeing to withhold approval of the Potential Financing, there would be no adjustment to the Per Share Merger Consideration; conversely, if it were determined in the arbitration that it would have been “reasonable” for Boeing to withhold approval of the Potential Financing, there would be a reduction to the Per Share Merger Consideration equal on a per-share basis to the amount of indebtedness incurred by Spirit in the Potential Financing, subject to a floor to be agreed upon by the parties (such proposal, the “Arbitration Proposal”). Discussions between Spirit and Boeing on the Financing Consent continued between October 26, 2024 and October 29, 2024.

On October 26, 2024, October 30, 2024 and October 31, 2024 members of the Spirit Board held meetings to discuss, among other matters, the Financing Consent. Representatives of Skadden were in attendance. The Spirit Board reviewed, discussed and considered alternatives potentially available to Spirit to address its liquidity needs, including the Financing Consent (including responses to Boeing with respect to the Arbitration Proposal), the Requested Boeing Financial Support Package and potential austerity measures should the Requested Boeing Financial Support Package or the Potential Financing not occur (the foregoing, collectively, the “Identified Liquidity Options”). Representatives of Skadden reviewed with the Spirit Board the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Arbitration Proposal and the Spirit Board’s fiduciary duties in connection with its review and consideration of the foregoing matters. The Spirit Board also considered the potential impact of each of the Identified Liquidity Options on Spirit’s business and operations and reviewed considerations with respect to each of the Identified Liquidity Options in relation to the Merger Agreement. Following further discussion, the Spirit Board determined that it was in the best interests of Spirit and Spirit Stockholders for Spirit to decline the Arbitration Proposal and authorized Spirit to continue to pursue the Financing Consent and (i) if Boeing’s approval of the Financing Consent was obtained, to proceed with the Potential Financing and (ii) if Boeing’s approval of the Financing Consent was not obtained, to continue to negotiate with Boeing to obtain the Requested Boeing Financial Support Package.

77

On Thursday, October 31, 2024, Boeing informed Spirit that it was unwilling to provide an unconditional Financing Consent and, instead, Boeing would be willing to provide a financial support package of up to $350 million (the “$350 Million Financial Support Package”).

Later on Thursday, October 31, 2024, the Spirit Board held a meeting to review, discuss and consider the $350 Million Financial Support Package. As part of its review, the Spirit Board discussed the risks, opportunities and considerations of continuing to seek Boeing’s approval of the Financing Consent and of pursuing and implementing potential austerity measures. Following further discussion and consideration, the Spirit Board authorized Spirit’s management to suspend the process for finalizing the Potential Financing and to negotiate and enter into a definitive agreement with Boeing for the $350 Million Financial Support Package.

Thereafter, and continuing until Friday, November 8, 2024, Spirit and Boeing negotiated the terms and conditions of the definitive agreement for the $350 Million Financial Support Package.

On Tuesday, November 5, 2024, Spirit filed its Form 10-Q for its quarterly period ended September 26, 2024. The Form 10-Q stated that substantial doubt existed about Spirit’s ability to continue as a going concern.

On Friday, November 8, 2024, Spirit and Boeing entered into an advance payments agreement (the “Advance Payments Agreement”). The Advance Payments Agreement provides for, among other things, Boeing to provide Spirit with advance payments of up to $350 million in the aggregate, subject to certain terms and conditions, to be used by Spirit to support producing and maintaining readiness to produce Boeing products at the rates contractually required by Boeing. The Advance Payments Agreement requires that Spirit repay the advances to Boeing between April 30 and December 31, 2026. Spirit announced the Advance Payments Agreement on Tuesday, November 12, 2024.

On Tuesday, November 12, 2024, effective November 8, 2024, Spirit and Airbus entered into an amended and restated memorandum of understanding (the “November 2024 Spirit/Airbus Memorandum of Understanding”), which amended and restated the June 2024 Spirit/Airbus Memorandum of Understanding as previously amended and restated, providing for, among other things, a $107 million non-interest bearing line of credit to Spirit, subject to certain terms and conditions, to be used as advance payments in connection with production for certain Airbus programs and the continued delivery of certain products to Airbus. Under the terms of the November 2024 Spirit/Airbus Memorandum of Understanding, such amounts, and the related payment obligations, will be assumed by Airbus upon the closing of the Airbus Transaction or, if earlier, repaid by Spirit to Airbus on April 1, 2026. Spirit announced the November 2024 Spirit/Airbus Memorandum of Understanding on Tuesday, November 12, 2024.

Boeing’s Reasons for the Merger

On June 30, 2024, the Boeing Board unanimously determined that it was in the best interests of Boeing to enter into the Merger Agreement and approved and declared advisable the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.

In the course of reaching its determinations and recommendations, the Boeing Board consulted with Boeing’s executive management team and its outside legal and financial advisors and considered a number of factors. Boeing’s reasons for the merger include the following:

78

The Boeing Board also considered a number of uncertainties, risks and other countervailing factors concerning the Merger and the Merger Agreement in its deliberations concerning the Merger and the Merger Agreement, taking into account the results of Boeing’s due diligence review of Spirit. These uncertainties, risks, and other countervailing factors include the following:

79

The foregoing discussion of factors considered by Boeing is not intended to be exhaustive but summarizes certain material factors considered by the Boeing Board. In light of the variety of factors considered in connection with their evaluation of the Merger Agreement and the Merger, the Boeing Board did not find it practicable to, and did not, quantify, rank or otherwise assign relative weights to the specific factors considered in reaching its determinations and recommendations. Moreover, each member of the Boeing Board applied his or her own personal business judgment to the process and may have given different weight to different factors. The Boeing Board based its recommendation on the totality of the information presented, including thorough discussions with, and questioning of, Boeing’s executive management team and Boeing’s advisors.

It should be noted that this explanation of the reasoning of the Boeing Board and certain information presented in this section is forward-looking in nature and should be read in light of the factors set forth in the section entitled “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” beginning on page 26 of this proxy statement/prospectus.

Recommendation of the Spirit Board and Its Reasons for the Merger

On June 30, 2024, the Spirit Board unanimously determined that it is advisable and in the best interests of Spirit and Spirit Stockholders for Spirit to enter into the Merger Agreement and complete the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger agreement and approved and declared advisable the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger. The Spirit Board unanimously recommends that Spirit Stockholders vote “FOR” the Merger Agreement Proposal.

80

In evaluating the Merger Agreement and the Merger Agreement Transactions, the Spirit Board consulted with Spirit’s management and legal and financial advisors. In recommending that Spirit Stockholders vote their shares of Spirit Common Stock in favor of the Merger Agreement Proposal, the Advisory Compensation Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal, the Spirit Board considered a number of factors, including the following (not necessarily listed in order of relative importance):

81

82

The Spirit Board also considered a number of uncertainties, risks and other factors in its deliberations concerning the Merger and the Merger Agreement Transactions, including the following (not necessarily listed in order of relative importance):

83

The Spirit Board believed that, overall, the potential benefits of the Merger to Spirit Stockholders outweighed the risks and uncertainties of the Merger and outweighed Spirit’s other financial and strategic alternatives, including to continue to operate as a standalone public company.

This discussion of the information and factors considered by the Spirit Board in reaching its conclusions and recommendation includes the principal factors considered by the Spirit Board, but is not intended to be exhaustive and may not include all of the factors considered by the Spirit Board. In view of the wide variety of factors considered in connection with its evaluation of the Merger and the Merger Agreement Transactions, and the complexity of these matters, the Spirit Board did not find it useful and did not attempt to quantify, rank or assign any relative or specific weights to the various factors that it considered in reaching its determination to approve the Merger and the Merger Agreement Transactions, and to make its recommendation to Spirit Stockholders. Rather, the Spirit Board viewed its decisions as being based on the totality of the information presented to it and the

84

factors it considered, including its discussions with, and questioning of, members of Spirit’s management and Spirit’s advisors, as well as its experience and history. In addition, individual members of the Spirit Board may have assigned different weights to different factors.

Certain of Spirit’s directors and executive officers have interests in the Merger that are different from, or in addition to, those of Spirit Stockholders generally. The Spirit Board was aware of and considered these potential interests, among other matters, in evaluating the Merger and in making its recommendation to Spirit Stockholders. For a discussion of these interests, see the section entitled “—Interests of Certain Spirit Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger” beginning on page 98 of this proxy statement/prospectus.

On June 30, 2024, the Spirit Board unanimously (a) approved and declared advisable the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, (b) determined that the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby are in the best interests of Spirit and its stockholders, (c) resolved to recommend adoption of the Merger Agreement by the stockholders entitled to vote thereon and (d) directed that the Merger Agreement be submitted to stockholders of Spirit for adoption at a meeting of stockholders of Spirit to be held to consider the adoption of the Merger Agreement. The Spirit Board unanimously recommends that Spirit Stockholders vote (i) “FOR” the Merger Agreement Proposal, (ii) “FOR” the Advisory Compensation Proposal and (iii) “FOR” the Adjournment Proposal.

Spirit Unaudited Forecasted Financial Information

Spirit does not, as a matter of course, publicly disclose long-term projections as to future revenues, earnings or other results due to, among other reasons, the uncertainty, unpredictability and subjectivity of the underlying assumptions and estimates. However, certain non-public financial forecasts covering multiple years, prepared by Spirit management and not for public disclosure, were provided to the Spirit Board in connection with its evaluation of the Merger and were also provided to Spirit’s financial advisors, Morgan Stanley and Moelis, including for use by Moelis in connection with its financial analysis and opinion described under the section entitled “—Opinion of Moelis & Company, LLC, Financial Advisor to Spirit” beginning on page 88 of this proxy statement/prospectus.

The summary of these financial forecasts presented below is not included in this proxy statement/prospectus to influence any Spirit Stockholder’s decision whether to vote for or against the Merger Agreement Proposal or the Advisory Compensation Proposal, but is included solely to give Spirit Stockholders access to these forecasts, because these forecasts were made available to the Spirit Board and the financial advisors of Spirit.

The inclusion in this proxy statement/prospectus of a summary of the Spirit forecasted financial information should not be regarded as an indication that the Spirit Board, or that Spirit or Boeing (or any of their respective affiliates, officers, directors, advisors or other representatives) or any other person, considered, or now considers, the Spirit forecasted financial information to be necessarily predictive of actual future events or results of Spirit’s or Boeing’s operations and should not be relied upon as such. Spirit management’s internal financial forecasts, upon which the Spirit forecasted financial information was based, are subjective in many respects. There can be no assurance that the Spirit forecasted financial information will be realized or that actual results will not be significantly higher or lower than forecasted. The Spirit forecasted financial information covers multiple years, and such information by its nature becomes less predictive with each successive year. As a result, the Spirit forecasted financial information summarized in this proxy statement/prospectus should not be relied on as necessarily predictive of actual future events.

In addition, the Spirit forecasted financial information was not prepared with a view to compliance with GAAP, published guidelines of the SEC or the guidelines established by the American Institute of

85

Certified Public Accountants for preparation or presentation of prospective financial information. The forecasted financial information included in this proxy statement/prospectus has been prepared by, and is the responsibility of, Spirit’s management. Ernst & Young LLP, Spirit’s independent registered public accounting firm, has not audited, reviewed, examined, compiled or applied agreed-upon procedures with respect to the Spirit forecasted financial information and does not express an opinion or any other form of assurance with respect thereto. The Ernst & Young LLP reports incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus relate to Spirit’s previously issued financial statements and to Spirit’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023. Those reports do not extend to the Spirit forecasted financial information and should not be read as doing so. Neither Boeing’s independent auditors, nor any other independent accountants, have compiled, examined, or performed any procedures with respect to the prospective financial information contained herein, nor have they expressed any opinion or any other form of assurance on such information or its achievability, and assume no responsibility for, and disclaim any association with, the prospective financial information.

The Spirit forecasted financial information was based on numerous variables and assumptions that were deemed to be reasonable as of the date when such forecasted financial information was finalized. Such assumptions relate to variables, most of which are beyond Spirit’s control, that are inherently uncertain and difficult or impossible to predict or estimate. Projected revenue is subject to various factors and contingencies, in particular the volume of shipset deliveries, which is subject to variability based on, among other things, customer orders that may increase or decrease relative to Spirit’s expectations based on macroeconomic, industry or customer-specific conditions and regulatory developments and any disruptions in Spirit’s supply chain or manufacturing operations. Assumptions that were used by Spirit in developing the Spirit forecasted financial information include, but are not limited to, the following:

The Spirit forecasted financial information also reflects assumptions regarding the continuing nature of certain business decisions that, in reality, would be subject to change. The Spirit forecasted financial information was based on information known to Spirit management as of May 31, 2024.

Important factors that may affect actual results and cause the Spirit forecasted financial information not to be achieved include, but are not limited to, uncertainties relating to Spirit’s business (including the ability to achieve strategic goals, objectives and targets), industry performance, the legal and regulatory environment, general business and economic conditions and other factors described in this proxy/statement prospectus or described or referenced in Spirit’s filings with the SEC, including Spirit’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 and subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K. The Spirit forecasted financial

86

information constitutes “forward-looking statements,” and actual results may differ materially and adversely from those projected. For more information, see the section entitled “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” beginning on page 26 of this proxy statement/prospectus. In addition, the Spirit forecasted financial information reflects assumptions as to certain business decisions that are subject to change and subjective judgment that is susceptible to multiple interpretations and to periodic revisions based on actual experience and business developments. The Spirit forecasted financial information does not reflect revised prospects for the respective businesses of Spirit and Boeing, changes in general business or economic conditions, or any other transaction or event that has occurred or that may occur and that was not anticipated at the time the Spirit forecasted financial information was prepared.

The Spirit forecasted financial information was developed for use by the Spirit Board in its evaluation of the Merger and by Moelis for purposes of its financial analysis and opinion utilizing Spirit management’s best then available estimates and judgments at the time of its preparation. The Spirit forecasted financial information was developed on a standalone basis without giving effect to the Merger or the potential disposition by Spirit of the Spirit Airbus Business or other portions of its business, and therefore, the Spirit forecasted financial information does not give effect to the Merger or any changes to the combined company’s operations or strategy that may be implemented after the Effective Time if the Merger is completed, including potential cost synergies to be realized as a result of the Merger, or to any costs incurred in connection with the Merger or any such potential dispositions. Furthermore, the Spirit forecasted financial information does not take into account the effect of any failure of the Merger and the disposition of the Spirit Airbus Business to be completed and should not be viewed as accurate or continuing in that context.

Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the Spirit forecasted financial information will be realized or that Spirit’s future financial results will not vary materially from the Spirit forecasted financial information. None of Spirit, Boeing or any of their respective affiliates, officers, directors, advisors or other representatives can give any assurance that actual results will not differ from the Spirit forecasted financial information, and none of Spirit, Boeing or any of their respective affiliates undertakes any obligation to update or otherwise revise or reconcile the Spirit forecasted financial information to reflect circumstances existing or developments and events occurring after the date of the Spirit forecasted financial information or that may occur in the future, even in the event that any or all of the assumptions underlying the Spirit forecasted financial information are not realized or are shown to be inappropriate, including with respect to the accounting treatment of the Merger under GAAP, or to reflect changes in general economic or industry conditions. Spirit and Boeing do not intend to make available publicly any update or other revision to the Spirit forecasted financial information, except as otherwise required by applicable law. None of Spirit, Boeing or any of their respective affiliates, officers, directors, advisors or other representatives has made or makes any representation to any Spirit Stockholder or any other person regarding the ultimate performance of Spirit or Boeing compared to the information contained in the Spirit forecasted financial information or that the outcomes reflected in or implied by the Spirit forecasted financial information will be achieved. The inclusion in this proxy statement/prospectus of a summary of the Spirit forecasted financial information should not be deemed an admission or representation by Spirit, Boeing or any of their respective advisors or other representatives or any other person that the Spirit forecasted financial information or such summary is viewed as material information of Spirit or Boeing, particularly in light of the inherent risks and uncertainties associated with such forecasts.

In light of the foregoing factors and considering that the special meeting will be held several months after the Spirit forecasted financial information was prepared, as well as the uncertainties inherent in the Spirit forecasted financial information, Spirit Stockholders are cautioned not to place undue, if any, reliance on the information presented in this summary of the Spirit forecasted financial information, and Spirit and Boeing urge all Spirit Stockholders to review Spirit’s most recent SEC filings for a description of Spirit’s reported financial results and Boeing’s most recent SEC filings for a

87

description of Boeing’s reported financial results. For additional information, see the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 204 of this proxy statement/prospectus.

Summary of Spirit Unaudited Forecasted Financial Information⁽¹⁾

In addition to the financial measures shown in the table above, the Spirit forecasted financial information included estimates of cash tax savings for the calendar years ending December 31, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027 and 2028 of $0, $89.2 million, $53.1 million, $32.8 million and $0, respectively, from net operating losses, tax credits and other tax attributes.

Opinion of Moelis & Company LLC, Financial Advisor to Spirit

Overview

At a meeting of the Spirit Board on June 30, 2024 to evaluate and approve the Merger, Moelis delivered an oral opinion, which was confirmed by delivery of a written opinion, dated June 30, 2024, addressed to the Spirit Board to the effect that, as of such date and based upon and subject to the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and other limitations set forth in the written opinion, the Per Share Merger Consideration to be received by holders of Spirit Common Stock (other than Excluded Shares) pursuant to the Merger Agreement was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders.

The full text of Moelis’s written opinion, dated June 30, 2024, which sets forth the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken in connection with the opinion, is attached as Annex B to this proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated herein by reference. Moelis’s opinion was provided for the use

88

and benefit of the Spirit Board (solely in its capacity as such) in its evaluation of the Merger. Moelis’s opinion is limited solely to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the Per Share Merger Consideration to be received by holders of Spirit Common Stock (other than Excluded Shares) pursuant to the Merger Agreement and does not address Spirit’s underlying business decision to effect the Merger or the relative merits of the Merger as compared to any alternative business strategies or transactions that might be available to Spirit. Moelis’s opinion does not constitute a recommendation as to how any holder of securities should vote or act with respect to the Merger or any other matter.

In arriving at its opinion, Moelis, among other things:

In connection with its analysis and opinion, Moelis, at the direction of the Spirit Board, relied on the information supplied to, discussed with or reviewed by it for purposes of its opinion being complete and accurate in all material respects. Moelis did not independently verify any such information (or assume any responsibility for the independent verification of any such information). With the consent of the Spirit Board, Moelis also relied on the representation of Spirit’s management that they were not aware of any facts or circumstances that would make any such information inaccurate or misleading. With the consent of the Spirit Board, Moelis relied upon, without independent verification, the assessment of Spirit and its legal, tax, regulatory and accounting advisors with respect to legal, tax, regulatory and accounting matters. With respect to the Spirit forecasted financial information, Moelis assumed, at the direction of the Spirit Board, that they were reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the best then available estimates and judgments of the management of Spirit as to the future performance of Spirit. Moelis did not express any views as to the reasonableness of any financial forecasts or the assumptions on which they were based. With the consent of the Spirit Board, Moelis assumed that Boeing’s filings with the SEC complied with

89

applicable securities laws and did not contain any material misstatements or omissions. In addition, Moelis did not make any independent evaluation or appraisal of any of the assets or liabilities (contingent, derivative, off-balance-sheet, or otherwise) of Spirit or Boeing, nor was Moelis furnished with any such evaluation or appraisal. Moelis was not provided with financial forecasts for Boeing, and, given the market capitalization of Boeing, the trading volume of Boeing Common Stock and the aggregate amount of Boeing Common Stock to be received by the Spirit Stockholders in the Merger, for purposes of its analysis, Moelis assumed, with the consent of the Spirit Board, that the value of Boeing Common Stock was the closing price per share on the last day prior to the review of its analysis by a Moelis fairness opinion committee.

Moelis’s opinion did not address Spirit’s underlying business decision to effect the Merger or the relative merits of the Merger as compared to any alternative business strategies or transactions that might be available to Spirit. Moelis’s opinion did not address any legal, regulatory, tax or accounting matters. Moelis was not asked to, and Moelis did not, offer any opinion as to any terms of the Merger Agreement or any aspect or implication of the Merger, except for the fairness of the Per Share Merger Consideration from a financial point of view to the holders of Spirit Common Stock. Moelis was not asked to, and Moelis did not, offer any opinion as to any terms of the Airbus Term Sheet or any aspect or implication of the transactions contemplated thereby. Moelis did not express any opinion as to what the value of Boeing Common Stock actually will be when issued pursuant to the Merger or the prices at which Spirit Common Stock or Boeing Common Stock may trade at any time. Moelis did not express any opinion as to fair value, viability or the solvency of Spirit or Boeing following the Closing. In rendering its opinion, Moelis assumed, with the consent of the Spirit Board, that the final executed form of the Merger Agreement would not differ in any material respect from the draft that Moelis reviewed, that the Merger would be consummated in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement without any waiver or modification that could be material to Moelis’s analysis, that the representations and warranties of each party set forth in the Merger Agreement were accurate and correct, and that the parties to the Merger Agreement would comply with all the material terms of the Merger Agreement. Moelis assumed, with the consent of the Spirit Board, that all governmental, regulatory or other consents or approvals necessary for the completion of the Merger would be obtained, except to the extent that could not be material to its analysis. Moelis was not authorized to solicit and did not solicit indications of interest in a possible transaction with Spirit from any party. Moelis also was not requested to, and did not, participate in the structuring or negotiation of the Merger.

Moelis’s opinion was necessarily based on economic, monetary, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to Moelis as of, the date of its opinion, and Moelis assumed no responsibility to update its opinion for developments after the date of its opinion.

Moelis’s opinion did not address the fairness of the Merger or any aspect or implication thereof to, or any other consideration of or relating to, the holders of any class of securities, creditors or other constituencies of Spirit, other than the fairness of the Per Share Merger Consideration from a financial point of view to the holders of Spirit Common Stock. In addition, Moelis did not express any opinion as to the fairness of the amount or nature of any compensation to be received by any officers, directors or employees of any parties to the Merger, or any class of such persons, relative to the Per Share Merger Consideration or otherwise. Moelis’s opinion was approved by a Moelis fairness opinion committee.

Summary of Financial Analyses

The following is a summary of the material financial analyses presented by Moelis to the Spirit Board at its meeting held on June 28, 2024, in connection with the delivery of the Moelis opinion. This summary describes the material analyses underlying Moelis’s opinion, but does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses performed by Moelis in connection with its opinion.

90

Some of the summaries of financial analyses below include information presented in tabular format. In order to fully understand Moelis’s analyses, the tables must be read together with the text of each summary. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the analyses. Considering the data described below without considering the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of Moelis’s analyses.

In this summary, stock prices (i) with respect to Spirit are based on the closing share price of Spirit Common Stock on February 29, 2024 (the day prior to Spirit’s press release confirming discussions with Boeing regarding a potential transaction and which Moelis deemed to be the unaffected trading date for purposes of its analyses (the “Unaffected Date”)) and June 26, 2024, and (ii) with respect to other companies are based on closing share prices on June 26, 2024.

For purposes of its analyses, Moelis calculated implied per share value ranges based on (i) Spirit’s net debt as of March 31, 2024, excluding Spirit’s 3.250% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2028, (ii) Spirit’s non-controlling interests as of March 31, 2024, and (iii) the number of fully diluted shares of Spirit Common Stock as of June 26, 2024, assuming the principal amount of Spirit’s 3.250% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2028 was converted to equity as of such date, excluding the potential issuance of additional shares as a result of any make-whole premium. All such information for Spirit was provided by management of Spirit.

For purposes of Moelis’s analyses:

Unless the context indicates otherwise, (i) the estimates of the future financial performance for the selected publicly traded companies listed below were based on publicly available research analyst estimates for those companies, and (ii) the estimates of the future financial performance of Spirit relied upon in the financial analyses described below were based on the Spirit forecasted financial information.

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis

Utilizing the Spirit forecasted financial information and other information and data provided by Spirit management, Moelis performed a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) analysis of Spirit to calculate the present value, as of March 31, 2024, of (a) the estimated future unlevered after-tax free cash flows

91

projected to be generated by Spirit for the nine months ending December 31, 2024 and the calendar years ending December 31, 2025 through December 31, 2028 and (b) the estimated terminal value of Spirit, taking into account the present value of Spirit’s tax attributes. For purposes of the DCF analysis, Moelis calculated unlevered free cash flow as Adjusted EBITDA less (i) cash taxes, (ii) capital expenditures and (iii) change in net working capital and other.

Moelis utilized a range of discount rates of 9.50% to 11.75% based on an estimated range of the weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”) for Spirit. The estimated WACC range was derived using the Capital Asset Pricing Model and a size premium. Moelis used the foregoing range of discount rates to calculate the present values as of March 31, 2024 of (i) the estimated unlevered after-tax free cash flows of Spirit for the nine months ending December 31, 2024 and the calendar years ending December 31, 2025 through December 31, 2028 (in each case, discounted using a mid-year discounting convention) and (ii) the estimated terminal values derived by applying a range of selected terminal multiples of 7.00x to 8.75x to Spirit’s estimated terminal year Adjusted EBITDA.

For purposes of selecting the reference range to apply to Spirit’s estimated terminal year Adjusted EBITDA, Moelis noted that (i) the low-end of the selected reference range was informed by the historical median trading multiples for Spirit during selected periods prior to the temporary grounding of the Boeing 737 MAX beginning in 2019 and the trading multiples for Spirit on the Unaffected Date and (ii) the high-end of the range was informed by the historical median trading multiple discount for Spirit to the median trading multiple of the Selected Companies (as defined below) during selected periods prior to the Boeing 737 MAX grounding and the top of the range of the middle quartiles for the historical trading multiples for Spirit during periods prior to the temporary grounding of the Boeing 737 MAX beginning in 2019. Based on the foregoing analysis and its professional judgement and experience, Moelis selected a multiple range of 7.00x to 8.75x estimated terminal year Adjusted EBITDA. Moelis then applied such multiple range to Spirit’s estimated terminal year Adjusted EBITDA provided by Spirit’s management to calculate the estimated terminal values.

In calculating the implied per share value range for Spirit Common Stock, Moelis separately calculated the net present value as of March 31, 2024 of Spirit’s tax attributes, including net operating losses, tax credits and other tax attributes, with the utilization based on cash tax savings estimates provided by Spirit’s management for calendar years ending December 31, 2024 through December 31, 2028 (in each case, discounted using a mid-year discounting convention) and using an estimated cost of equity range for Spirit of 10.25% to 17.25%.

The DCF analysis indicated an implied per share value range for Spirit Common Stock of $17.29 to $30.24 per share. Moelis compared such implied per share value range to the implied value of the Per Share Merger Consideration of $37.25.

Selected Publicly Traded Companies Analysis

Moelis reviewed financial and stock market information of the selected publicly traded companies noted below (the “Selected Companies”), which Moelis determined, based on its professional judgment and experience, to be generally relevant in certain respects to Spirit for purposes of this analysis. In determining the publicly traded companies to use in this analysis, Moelis referenced publicly traded companies that operate in the aerospace and defense sector that are direct suppliers to aircraft manufacturers and have substantive build-to-print content, with a focus on companies with aerostructures products as part of their portfolios. Moelis excluded publicly traded companies that primarily design their own products and retain the intellectual property, or whose primary customers are aeroengine manufacturers, or that derive a significant portion of their revenue from aerospace aftermarket product sales.

92

The Selected Companies used by Moelis in this analysis are as follows:

Moelis reviewed and analyzed, among other things, the TEV of each of the Selected Companies, as well as Spirit, as a multiple of estimated Adjusted EBITDA for each of the calendar years 2025 and 2026, in each case as of, and based on publicly available consensus research estimates as of, (i) February 29, 2024 (the Unaffected Date) and (ii) June 26, 2024. Moelis noted that, as a result of the depressed production rates at Boeing and Spirit, trading multiples for calendar year 2024 were considered to be less informative and were excluded for purposes of the Moelis analysis.

The Selected Companies and their implied TEV to estimated Adjusted EBITDA for each of the calendar years 2025 and 2026 used by Moelis in this analysis are summarized in the following table:

In reviewing the characteristics of Spirit and the Selected Companies for purposes of selecting the reference ranges to apply to Spirit’s estimated financial metrics, Moelis ultimately considered Spirit as its own best reference point given that there were no other publicly traded companies whose earnings profiles were primarily attributable to the aerostructures business and who derived over 60% of their revenue from a single customer (Boeing, in the case of Spirit). Moelis noted that aerostructures businesses supplying structural components to aircraft OEMs (such as Boeing and Airbus) are typically viewed as having lower trading multiples from a valuation perspective than other portions of the aerospace supply chain (such as aeroengine or aerospace systems businesses) given that aerostructures businesses exhibit a combination of high capital intensity, lack of hard intellectual property (such as ownership of designs of components) and highly competitive pricing dynamics from a limited set of customers with single-digit EBITDA margins. Moelis also noted that Spirit itself had lower EBITDA margins as compared to the Selected Companies. Moelis considered but placed less emphasis on (i) Melrose, given that over 60% of its EBITDA was derived from its higher margin aeroengine components business, (ii) FACC, given that a single shareholder holds more than 55% of FACC’s voting rights and that FACC trades on the Vienna Stock Exchange with limited float and (iii) Héroux-Devtek due to its lack of aerostructures exposure and relatively low public float.

93

In determining the selected reference ranges to apply to Spirit’s estimated financial metrics, Moelis noted that (i) the low-end of the selected reference ranges was informed by the trading multiples for Spirit on the Unaffected Date and (ii) the high-end of the selected reference ranges was informed by the median trading multiple discount for Spirit to the median trading multiple of the Selected Companies on the Unaffected Date and during selected periods prior to the Boeing 737 MAX grounding.

Based on the foregoing analysis and its professional judgement and experience, Moelis selected (i) a reference range for TEV/2025E Adjusted EBITDA multiples for Spirit of 7.0x to 8.5x and (ii) a reference range for TEV/2026E Adjusted EBITDA multiples for Spirit of 6.0x to 7.5x. Moelis then applied these multiples to Spirit’s 2025E Adjusted EBITDA and 2026E Adjusted EBITDA based on the Spirit forecasted financial information. This analysis indicated implied per share value ranges for Spirit Common Stock of $21.98 to $32.60 per share (based on 2025E Adjusted EBITDA) and $16.54 to $27.57 (based on 2026E Adjusted EBITDA). Moelis compared such implied per share value ranges to the implied value of the Per Share Merger Consideration of $37.25.

Other Information

Moelis also noted for the Spirit Board certain additional factors that were not considered part of Moelis’s financial analysis with respect to its opinion but were referenced for informational purposes only, including, among other things:

Selected Precedent Transactions Analysis

Moelis reviewed and considered, but Moelis’s opinion did not rely on, financial information for six selected precedent transactions, which Moelis determined, based on its professional judgment and experience, to be generally relevant in certain respects to Spirit for purposes of this analysis. In determining the precedent transactions to use in this analysis, Moelis referenced precedent transactions that (i) were announced in the last 15 years with TEVs of at least $250 million and (ii) involved target companies that operate in the aerospace and defense sector that are direct suppliers to aircraft manufacturers and have substantive build-to-print content, with a focus on companies with aerostructures products as part of their portfolios.

In performing its analysis, Moelis reviewed and analyzed, among other things, the implied TEV of the target business for each of the selected precedent transactions as a multiple of the last twelve month (“LTM”) and next twelve month (“NTM”) EBITDA for each target business. Financial data for such selected precedent transactions were based on public filings and other publicly available information relating to the relevant transaction, and LTM and NTM EBITDA for each target company were calculated based on publicly available financial data at the time of announcement of the relevant selected precedent transaction.

Based on the foregoing analysis and its professional judgement and experience, Moelis selected (i) a reference range for TEV/LTM Adjusted EBITDA multiples for Spirit of 8.5x to 9.5x and (ii) a reference range for TEV/NTM Adjusted EBITDA multiples for Spirit of 8.0x to 9.0x. Moelis then applied these multiples to Spirit’s LTM Adjusted EBITDA as of March 31, 2024 and Spirit’s NTM Adjusted EBITDA as of March 31, 2024 based on the Spirit forecasted financial information. Under this analysis, the implied TEV for Spirit was less than Spirit’s net debt along the entire LTM multiple range and at the low-end of the NTM multiple range. As a result, this analysis indicated an implied per share value range for Spirit Common Stock of $0.00 per share based on LTM multiples and $0.00 to $2.91 per share based on NTM multiples. Moelis compared such implied per share value ranges to the implied value of the Per Share Merger Consideration of $37.25.

94

While Moelis reviewed and considered the selected precedent transactions, Moelis ultimately considered this analysis for reference only due to the recent historical and near-term expected financial challenges at Spirit as a result of the depressed production rates at Boeing and Spirit.

52-Week High / Low

Moelis reviewed the historical trading performance of Spirit Common Stock over a 52-week period ending June 26, 2024, which ranged from a closing share price low of $14.84 on September 21, 2023 to a closing share price high of $36.07 on March 28, 2024. For reference only, Moelis compared this share price range with the implied value of the Per Share Merger Consideration of $37.25.

Equity Research Analyst Share Price Targets

Moelis reviewed publicly available share price targets from Wall Street equity research for Spirit Common Stock published as of June 26, 2024, which ranged from $29.00 per share to $40.00 per share, with a median of $35.00 per share, and as of the Unaffected Date, which ranged from $26.00 per share to $45.00 per share, with a median of $34.00 per share. For reference only, Moelis compared these ranges with the implied value of the Per Share Merger Consideration of $37.25.

Miscellaneous

This summary of the analyses is not a complete description of Moelis’s opinion or the analyses underlying, and factors considered in connection with, Moelis’s opinion. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex analytical process and is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. Selecting portions of the analyses or summary set forth above, without considering the analyses as a whole, could create an incomplete view of the processes underlying Moelis’s opinion. In arriving at its fairness determination, Moelis considered the results of all of its analyses and did not attribute any particular weight to any factor or analysis. Rather, Moelis made its fairness determination on the basis of its experience and professional judgment after considering the results of all of its analyses.

No company or transaction used in the analyses described above is identical to Spirit or the Merger. In addition, such analyses do not purport to be appraisals, nor do they necessarily reflect the prices at which businesses or securities actually may be sold. Analyses based upon forecasts of future results are not necessarily indicative of actual future results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by such analyses. Because the analyses described above are inherently subject to uncertainty, being based upon numerous factors or events beyond the control of the parties or their respective advisors, neither Spirit nor Moelis or any other person assumes responsibility if future results are materially different from those forecasts.

Except as described in this summary, the Spirit Board imposed no other instructions or limitations on Moelis with respect to the investigations made or procedures followed by Moelis in rendering its opinion. The Per Share Merger Consideration was determined through arm’s length negotiations between the parties to the Merger Agreement and was approved by the Spirit Board. Moelis did not recommend any specific consideration to Spirit or the Spirit Board or advise Spirit or the Spirit Board that any specific amount or type of consideration constituted the only appropriate consideration in connection with the Merger.

Moelis was engaged by Spirit to render its opinion and earned a fee of $5.0 million upon delivery of its opinion, which fee was not contingent upon either the conclusion expressed in its opinion or successful consummation of the Merger. In addition, Spirit has agreed to reimburse Moelis for certain

95

of its expenses, including the reasonable costs of Moelis’s legal counsel, and indemnify Moelis and related persons for certain liabilities, including liabilities under the federal securities laws, arising out of its engagement. Spirit selected Moelis as a financial advisor in connection with the Merger because Moelis has substantial experience in similar transactions and familiarity with Spirit. Moelis is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, strategic transactions, corporate restructurings and valuations for corporate and other purposes.

Moelis’s affiliates, employees, officers and partners may at any time own securities (long or short) of Spirit, Boeing and Airbus. In the past three years prior to the date of its opinion, Moelis did not provide investment banking or other services to Boeing. In the past three years prior to the date of its opinion, Moelis acted as a financial advisor (i) to Spirit in connection with a refinancing and capital raise that was consummated in 2023, for which Moelis received a fee of approximately $3.8 million, and (ii) a division of Airbus in connection with an acquisition transaction that was consummated in 2024, for which Moelis received a fee of approximately $4.0 million. In the future, Moelis may provide investment banking and other services to Spirit, Boeing or Airbus and may receive compensation for such services.

96

Certain Matters Relating to Morgan Stanley

Morgan Stanley is a global financial services firm engaged in the securities, investment management and individual wealth management businesses. Its securities business is engaged in securities underwriting, trading and brokerage activities, foreign exchange, commodities and derivatives trading, prime brokerage, as well as providing investment banking, financing and financial advisory services. Morgan Stanley and its affiliates, directors and officers may at any time invest on a principal basis or manage funds that invest, hold long or short positions, finance positions, and may trade or otherwise structure and effect transactions, for their own account or the accounts of their customers, in debt or equity securities or loans of Spirit, Boeing, Airbus or any other company, or any currency or commodity, that may be involved in the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, or any related derivative instrument.

Under the terms of its engagement letter, Morgan Stanley provided the Spirit Board with financial advisory services in connection with the Merger. Spirit has agreed to pay Morgan Stanley for its services in connection with the Merger an aggregate fee, all of which is contingent upon the closing of the Merger, which is estimated, as of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, to be approximately $51.0 million. Spirit has also agreed to reimburse Morgan Stanley for its reasonable expenses, including fees of outside counsel and other professional advisors, incurred in connection with its engagement. In addition, Spirit has agreed to indemnify Morgan Stanley and its affiliates, their respective officers, directors, employees, advisors and agents and each other person, if any, controlling Morgan Stanley or any of its affiliates against certain losses, claims, damages and liabilities relating to or arising out of or in connection with Morgan Stanley’s engagement. Morgan Stanley has also received and expects to receive aggregate fees of between $5.0 million and $15.0 million in connection with the Morgan Stanley Bridge Facility.

As of May 28, 2024 (the latest date of relationship disclosure provided to the Spirit Board), Morgan Stanley held an aggregate interest of between 3% and 4% in Spirit Common Stock, between 1% and 2% in Boeing Common Stock and between 1% and 2% in the common stock of Airbus, which interests were held in connection with Morgan Stanley’s (i) investment management business, (ii) wealth management business, including client discretionary accounts or (iii) ordinary course trading activities, including hedging activities. In the two years prior to May 28, 2024, Morgan Stanley and its affiliates provided financing services to Spirit and received aggregate fees of between $15.0 million and $25.0 million for such services. In the two years prior to May 28, 2024, Morgan Stanley and its affiliates provided financing services to Boeing and received aggregate fees of between $5.0 million and $10.0 million for such services. Morgan Stanley was, as of May 28, 2024, and currently is providing financial advisory services to an affiliate of Boeing, unrelated to the Merger, for which Morgan Stanley expects to receive customary fees if the relevant transaction is completed. Morgan Stanley expects that such fees would be less than the fees Morgan Stanley would receive from Spirit in connection with the Merger. In the two years prior to May 28, 2024, Morgan Stanley and its affiliates provided financing services to Airbus and received aggregate fees of less than $2.0 million for such services. Morgan Stanley was, as of May 28, 2024, and currently is providing financial advisory services to an affiliate of Airbus, unrelated to the Merger, for which Morgan Stanley expects to receive customary fees if the relevant transaction is completed. Morgan Stanley expects that such fees would be less than the fees Morgan Stanley would receive from Spirit in connection with the Merger. With the permission of the Spirit Board, Morgan Stanley acted as an underwriter and joint book-running manager for Boeing’s October 2024 public offerings of Boeing Common Stock and Boeing depositary shares. In connection with those offerings, Morgan Stanley received compensation from Boeing, consisting of underwriting discounts, of approximately $8 million. In addition, Morgan Stanley or an affiliate thereof is a lender to each of Boeing and Airbus and, as a result of the Morgan Stanley Bridge Facility, Spirit. Morgan Stanley may seek to provide financial advisory and financing services to Spirit, Boeing and Airbus and their respective affiliates in the future and would expect to receive fees for the

97

rendering of these services. In connection with Morgan Stanley’s work on the Potential Financing, Spirit will pay or reimburse Morgan Stanley for certain expenses.

Interests of Certain Spirit Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger

In considering the recommendation of the Spirit Board that Spirit Stockholders vote ”FOR” the Merger Agreement Proposal, Spirit Stockholders should be aware that Spirit’s executive officers and nonemployee directors have interests in the Merger that may be different from, or in addition to, those of Spirit Stockholders generally. The Spirit Board was aware of and considered these interests, among other matters, in approving the Merger Agreement and the Merger and in recommending that Spirit Stockholders vote their shares of Spirit Common Stock in favor of the Merger Agreement Proposal, the Advisory Compensation Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal.

Executive Officers and Nonemployee Directors

For purposes of this disclosure, Spirit’s named executive officers are:

In accordance with SEC rules, this disclosure also covers current and former executive officers of Spirit who served as executive officers at any time since January 1, 2023 and who are currently active employees of Spirit (collectively, the “Other Covered Employees”). The Other Covered Employees comprise Sean Black (Senior Vice President, Engineering and R&T); Terry George (Senior Vice President of Wichita and Tulsa Operations); Kailash Krishnaswamy (Senior Vice President and Chief Procurement Officer); David Myers (General Counsel); Keith Schrader (Vice President of Spirit AeroSystems Defense & Space); Justin Welner (Senior Vice President and Chief Administration Officer & Compliance Officer); Gregg Brown (Senior Vice President Global Quality); and Damon Ward (Vice President, Corporate Controller). In addition, former employees Mindy McPheeters (former Senior Vice

98

President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary), who separated from employment with Spirit effective July 21, 2024, and Mark Miklos (former Senior Vice President of Spirit AeroSystems Defense & Space), who separated from employment with Spirit effective November 21, 2024, are also covered by the SEC rules applicable to this disclosure, but since they are not expected to receive any benefits in connection with the Merger that are different from those received by stockholders generally, they are not included in the discussion below.

For purposes of this disclosure, Spirit’s nonemployee directors are: Robert D. Johnson; Stephen A. Cambone; Jane P. Chappell; William A. Fitzgerald; Paul E. Fulchino; Ronald T. Kadish; John L. Plueger; James R. Ray, Jr.; and Laura H. Wright.

Certain Assumptions

Except as otherwise specifically noted, for purposes of quantifying the potential payments and benefits described in this section, the following assumptions were used:

As the amounts indicated below are estimates based on multiple assumptions that may or may not actually occur or be accurate as of the date referenced, the actual amounts, if any, that may be paid or become payable may materially differ from the amounts set forth below.

Treatment and Quantification of Spirit Equity Awards

Each of Spirit’s directors, named executive officers and Other Covered Employees will be entitled to receive, for each vested share of Spirit common stock such individual holds, the Per Share Merger Consideration in the same manner as other Spirit Stockholders.

With respect to Spirit equity awards, the awards held by nonemployee directors, Spirit named executive officers and Other Covered Employees will be treated the same as the Spirit equity awards held by employees generally, as described in the section entitled “The Merger—Treatment of Spirit Equity Awards and ESPP” beginning on page 114 of this proxy statement/prospectus.

99

At the Effective Time, each Spirit restricted share and Spirit RSU held by the nonemployee members of the Spirit Board, whether vested or unvested, will convert into the right to receive shares of Boeing Common Stock in the manner described for Specified Awards in the section entitled “The Merger—Treatment of Spirit Equity Awards and the ESPP” beginning on page 114 of this proxy statement/prospectus. Based on the assumptions described under the section entitled “—Interests of Certain Spirit Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger—Certain Assumptions,” the estimated aggregate amount that would become payable to Spirit’s nine nonemployee directors in respect of their Spirit restricted shares is $1,040,366 and in respect of their Spirit RSUs is $2,680,363.

At the Effective Time, each Spirit RSU and Spirit PSU held by Spirit’s executive officers will be treated in the manner described in the section entitled “The Merger—Treatment of Spirit Equity Awards and the ESPP” beginning on page 114 of this proxy statement/prospectus, and will remain subject to the same time-based vesting conditions and other terms and conditions as were applicable immediately prior to and after giving effect to the Effective Time (except that the performance metrics applicable to Spirit’s PSUs shall not apply from and after the Effective Time). Each converted Spirit RSU and Spirit PSU will immediately vest and become nonforfeitable in the event that an executive officer experiences a qualifying termination of employment by Spirit and/or Boeing during the period beginning 30 days prior to, and ending two years following the Effective Time (other than the equity awards described below for Mr. Shanahan and Ms. Esteves, which vest upon certain qualifying terminations pursuant to their individual award agreements and employment agreements), as further described in the section entitled “—Severance Payments Upon a Qualifying Termination Prior to or Following the Effective Time.” See the section entitled “—Interests of Certain Spirit Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger—Quantification of Potential Payments and Benefits to Spirit’s Named Executive Officers” for an estimate of the amounts that would become payable to each Spirit named executive officer in respect of their Spirit RSUs and Spirit PSUs. Based on the assumptions described above under the section entitled “—Interests of Certain Spirit Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger—Certain Assumptions,” the estimated aggregate amount that would become payable upon a qualifying termination to Other Covered Employees as a group in respect of their unvested converted Spirit RSUs is $3,903,600 and unvested converted Spirit PSUs is $3,630,364.

Severance Payments Upon a Qualifying Termination Prior to or Following the Effective Time

Senior Management Severance Plan

On July 31, 2024, the Spirit Board adopted the Senior Management Severance Plan, effective as of July 30, 2024, pursuant to which employees with the title Director and above may become eligible to receive severance payments and benefits upon certain qualifying termination events. The Senior Management Severance Plan provides for severance benefits in the event of a participant’s “qualifying termination,” which is a termination of employment without “cause” or for “good reason.” All severance benefits are offset by statutory severance provided by applicable law and other termination-related payments provided by the participant’s employment or service agreement, as applicable. Additionally, all severance benefits are conditioned on the participant signing and not revoking a general release of claims and complying with the terms of any restrictive covenants, including non-competition, non-solicitation, non-disparagement and confidentiality covenants. If a participant experiences a qualifying termination, such participant will be entitled to receive (i) a cash lump sum equal to 12 months of the participant’s then current annual base salary and (ii) an additional cash lump sum equal to the cost of COBRA medical and dental benefits coverage for a period of 12 months. Spirit also provides post-termination severance compensation through individual agreements with Mr. Shanahan and Ms. Esteves as described below.

The potential value of the payments and benefits that Spirit’s named executive officers may receive on a qualifying termination under the senior management severance plan and individual agreements is shown in the section entitled “—Quantification of Potential Payments and Benefits to

100

Spirit Named Executive Officers” beginning on page 104 of this proxy statement/prospectus. The aggregate estimated value of the payments and benefits that the Other Covered Employees may receive on a qualifying termination, based on the assumptions described in the section entitled “—Interests of Certain Spirit Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger—Certain Assumptions,” is $3,385,000.

Employment and Individual Award Agreements with Mr. Shanahan

On June 30, 2024, in connection with the signing of the Merger Agreement, Spirit granted a one-time award of restricted stock units to Mr. Shanahan (the “CEO Retention RSU Grant”). The CEO Retention RSU Grant will vest upon the earlier of (a) the one-year anniversary of the grant date and (b) the completion of the Merger, subject to Mr. Shanahan’s continued employment with Spirit through such date. If Mr. Shanahan’s employment is terminated by Spirit without cause or by Mr. Shanahan for good reason, then, for as long as Mr. Shanahan complies with his continuing obligations under his employment agreement, including non-competition, non-solicitation and other restrictive covenants, and contingent upon Mr. Shanahan’s timely execution and non-revocation of a release of claims in favor of Spirit and its affiliates, the CEO Retention RSU Grant would be treated as 100% vested.

Pursuant to Mr. Shanahan’s employment agreement, in the event of a qualifying termination within one year of a change in control, then Mr. Shanahan will be eligible to receive cash severance equal to one year’s annualized base salary. Under the terms of Mr. Shanahan’s employment agreement, had such qualifying termination occurred prior to September 30, 2024, then Mr. Shanahan would have been eligible to receive additional cash severance equal to the portion of his annualized base salary that he would otherwise have received during the one-year period of employment following September 30, 2023, but for the qualifying termination. Pursuant to Mr. Shanahan’s employment agreement and individual award agreement, if he experiences a qualifying termination, regardless of whether a change in control has occurred, then the RSU award granted on September 30, 2023 in connection with his employment will become fully vested as of the date of such qualifying termination. The potential severance benefits described in this paragraph are subject to Mr. Shanahan’s continued compliance with the confidentiality, non-competition and non-solicitation covenants set forth in his employment agreement and satisfaction of a release of claims requirement.

Employment and Individual Award Agreements with Ms. Esteves

Under Ms. Esteves’s employment agreement, if a qualifying termination had occurred within six months of June 5, 2024 (including following a change in control), then, for as long as Ms. Esteves complied with her continuing obligations under the employment agreement, including non-competition, non-solicitation and other restrictive covenants, she would have been entitled to full acceleration of her one-time RSU award granted on June 5, 2024. Ms. Esteves’s employment agreement provides that Ms. Esteves is eligible to receive a retention bonus payable in a lump sum amount of $250,000 if she remains employed by Spirit through the earlier of April 1, 2025 or a change in control.

Retirement Agreement and General Release with Mr. Brown

On February 20, 2024, Spirit and William E. Brown entered into a Retirement Agreement and General Release (the “Brown Retirement Agreement”), pursuant to which Mr. Brown resigned as an executive officer effective March 17, 2024. Mr. Brown currently serves as Senior Advisor to Spirit, which service is expected to continue through March 15, 2025, or such other date as may be mutually agreed (the “Retirement Date”). Mr. Brown will continue to receive his current base salary through the Retirement Date, and Mr. Brown is eligible to receive a prorated bonus for the period from January 1, 2024 until the Retirement Date based on a target award opportunity of 100% of his annual base salary, subject to actual achievement of performance under the STIP. Mr. Brown is not entitled to

101

receive any new equity grants for 2025, and the equity awards previously granted to him under the Amended and Restated 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan will continue to vest until the Retirement Date in accordance with their terms, which include, by reason of Mr. Brown’s retirement after reaching age 62, accelerated vesting of certain time-based awards and prorated accelerated vesting of certain performance-based awards, subject to satisfaction of performance conditions. The Brown Retirement Agreement also contains non-competition and non-solicitation provisions, as well as confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions and a general release of claims against Spirit.

Retirement Agreement and General Release with Mr. Hawkins

On January 16, 2023, Spirit and Duane Hawkins entered into a Retirement Agreement and General Release (the “Hawkins Retirement Agreement”), pursuant to which Mr. Hawkins resigned as an executive officer effective April 1, 2023, and continued his employment as Senior Advisor to Spirit until April 1, 2024. Pursuant to the Hawkins Retirement Agreement, upon his retirement, certain time-based equity awards and a pro-rata portion of his performance-based equity awards accelerated, subject to satisfaction of performance conditions. Mr. Hawkins is also eligible to receive a prorated bonus for the period between January 1, 2024 and April 1, 2024 based on a target award opportunity of 75% of his annual base salary, subject to actual achievement of performance under the STIP. The Hawkins Retirement Agreement also contains non-competition and non-solicitation provisions, as well as confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions and a general release of claims against Spirit.

Perquisite Allowance Plan

In the event of an executive’s qualifying termination 30 days prior to, or two years following, a change in control, the Spirit Perquisite Allowance Plan provides for payment of the remaining unused portion of such executive’s allowance for the calendar year in which the qualifying termination occurs.

The potential value of the payments and benefits that Spirit’s named executive officers may receive on a qualifying termination under the Spirit Perquisite Allowance Plan described above is shown in the section entitled “—Quantification of Potential Payments and Benefits to Spirit Named Executive Officers” beginning on page 104 of this proxy statement/prospectus. The aggregate estimated value of the payments and benefits that the Other Covered Employees may receive on a qualifying termination, based on the assumptions described in the section entitled “—Interests of Certain Spirit Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger—Certain Assumptions” is $31,189.

Long-Term Incentive Program

Pursuant to Spirit’s Long-Term Incentive Program (“LTIP”), upon a participant’s qualifying termination 30 days prior to, or two years following a change in control, such participant will receive a cash award equal to the dollar value of the long-term incentive award that would have been made to such participant in the ordinary course of business within the 12-month period following the date of such qualifying termination, based on such participant’s annual base pay in effect on the date of the qualifying termination.

The potential value of the payments and benefits that Spirit’s named executive officers may receive on a qualifying termination under the LTIP described above is shown in the section entitled “—Quantification of Potential Payments and Benefits to Spirit Named Executive Officers” beginning on page 104 of this proxy statement/prospectus. The aggregate estimated value of the payments and benefits that the Other Covered Employees may receive on a qualifying termination, based on the assumptions described in the section entitled “—Interests of Certain Spirit Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger—Certain Assumptions” is $3,429,500.

102

Treatment of Annual Bonuses

In the event that the Closing occurs on or prior to the end of the applicable performance period for annual incentives in respect of the calendar year in which the Closing occurs, or prior to the payment of such annual incentives, Spirit employees, including the Spirit named executive officers and the Other Covered Employees, will be eligible to receive an annual bonus for such calendar year based on actual performance, which will be determined as provided in the Merger Agreement.

Additionally, pursuant to the terms of the Spirit Short-Term Incentive Program (“STIP”), upon a participant’s qualifying termination 30 days prior to, or two years following, a change in control, such participant will be entitled to receive his or her STIP benefit for the full plan year in which the qualifying termination occurs, with such performance metrics deemed achieved at the target level of performance.

The potential value of the annual bonus payments that Spirit’s named executive officers may receive at the Effective Time is shown in the section entitled “—Quantification of Potential Payments and Benefits to Spirit Named Executive Officers” beginning on page 104 of this proxy statement/prospectus. The aggregate estimated value of the annual bonus payments that the Other Covered Employees may receive at the Effective Time, based on the assumptions described in the section entitled “—Interests of Certain Spirit Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger—Certain Assumptions” is $2,434,500.

Retention Bonuses

Under the Merger Agreement, Spirit may establish a cash retention bonus program in the aggregate amount of $50 million (the “Retention Bonuses”) for the benefit of certain Spirit employees (including certain of Spirit’s named executive officers and Other Covered Employees). The Retention Bonuses are payable in two tranches, subject in each case to the recipient’s continued employment through the applicable payment date. In each case, the first 50% of the Retention Bonus will vest and become payable on the earlier of (a) December 15, 2024, and (b) the Closing Date; and the remaining 50% of the Retention Bonus will vest and become payable on the next regularly scheduled payroll date following the earlier of (a) the 90th day following the Closing Date and (b) the termination of the Merger Agreement. In the event of a recipient’s qualifying termination (as defined in the participant’s underlying cash retention bonus agreement) following the Closing, and to the extent the second tranche has not yet vested or been paid, the second tranche will immediately become vested and payable. Additionally, pursuant to her employment agreement, Ms. Esteves is eligible to receive a retention bonus payable in a lump sum amount of $250,000 if she remains employed by Spirit through the earlier of April 1, 2025 or a change in control (which the Merger would constitute). The amounts of the Retention Bonuses that have been approved as of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus that Spirit’s named executive officers may receive are shown in the section entitled “—Quantification of Potential Payments and Benefits to Spirit’s Named Executive Officers” beginning on page 104 of this proxy statement/prospectus. The aggregate expected value of the retention bonus payments that the Other Covered Employees may receive is $5,490,000.

280G Mitigation Actions

The Merger Agreement permits Spirit to, subject to prior consultation with Boeing, take certain tax-planning actions to mitigate any adverse tax consequences under the “golden parachute” provisions of Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code that could arise in connection with the completion of the Merger. Under the Merger Agreement, the tax-planning and mitigation actions may include accelerating cash payments that would have vested and otherwise become payable in calendar year 2025 or 2026 in the ordinary course of business, and accelerating settlement of equity incentive awards that would have vested and otherwise become payable in calendar year 2025 or thereafter. On

103

October 15, 2024, following consultation with Boeing, the Compensation Committee of the Spirit Board approved the acceleration into December 2024 of the vesting and settlement in shares of Spirit Common Stock of certain time-based restricted stock units (“Accelerated RSUs”) that otherwise would have vested and been settled in 2025 for affected individuals (including certain of Spirit’s executive officers) to mitigate the potential impact of the excise tax imposed on amounts that constitute “excess parachute payments” under Section 280G of the Code on such individuals. In accordance with the Merger Agreement, Spirit may take further action in consultation with Boeing to mitigate the potential impact of Section 280G, including accelerating annual cash incentive payments that would have become payable in 2025.

The accelerated vesting and settlement of the Accelerated RSUs will offset the corresponding payments or amounts each affected individual would otherwise have been entitled to receive upon the consummation of the Merger or otherwise in 2025, precluding duplication of payments. All accelerated payments with respect to the Accelerated RSUs will be reduced by applicable tax withholdings and are subject to the terms and conditions of the 280G Acceleration and Clawback Acknowledgment (the “Acknowledgment”) signed by each affected individual in connection with such accelerated vesting and settlement. The Acknowledgment provides that if an affected individual’s employment with Spirit or a subsidiary of Spirit is terminated other than upon a Qualifying Termination (as defined in the Acknowledgment) prior to the date on which the Accelerated RSUs would have vested and settled, but for the accelerated vesting and settlement of the Accelerated RSUs, then the applicable cash value representing the number of shares underlying the Accelerated RSUs will be required to be repaid to Spirit.

Compensation Arrangements with Boeing

Prior to the Effective Time, Boeing may in its discretion initiate negotiations of agreements, arrangements and understandings with certain of Spirit’s executive officers regarding compensation and benefits and may enter into definitive agreements with certain of Spirit’s executive officers regarding continued employment with, or the right to purchase or participate in the equity of, Boeing or one or more of its affiliates. As of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, no such agreements, arrangements or understandings have been entered into between any of Spirit’s executive officers and Boeing.

Indemnification; Directors’ and Officers’ Insurance

The Merger Agreement provides that directors and officers of Spirit will have the right to indemnification and continued coverage under directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies for a period of six years following the Effective Time. For additional information, see the section entitled “The Merger Agreement—Indemnification; Directors’ and Officers’ Insurance” beginning on page 142 of this proxy statement/prospectus.

Quantification of Potential Payments and Benefits to Spirit’s Named Executive Officers

In accordance with Item 402(t) of Regulation S-K, the table below sets forth, for each Spirit named executive officer, estimates of the amounts of compensation that are based on or otherwise relate to the Merger and that will or may become payable to such Spirit named executive officer either immediately at the Effective Time (i.e., on a “single-trigger” basis) or in the event of a qualifying termination of employment following the Merger (i.e., on a “double-trigger” basis). Spirit Stockholders are being asked to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, such compensation of the Spirit named executive officers. Because the vote to approve such compensation is an advisory vote, it will not be binding on Spirit, the Spirit Board or Boeing. Accordingly, if the Merger Agreement Proposal is approved by the Spirit Stockholders and the Merger is completed, such compensation will be payable

104

regardless of the outcome of the vote to approve such compensation, subject only to the conditions applicable thereto, which are described in the footnotes to the tables below and in this “—Interests of Certain Spirit Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger” section of this proxy statement/prospectus.

The potential payments shown in the table below are quantified in accordance with Item 402(t) of Regulation S-K. The estimated values are based on the assumptions described above. Additionally, the figures included in the table for Scott M. McLarty were calculated based on the exchange rate in effect on July 31, 2024 of $1.27390 to £1. The amounts shown in the table below are estimates based on multiple assumptions, including assumptions described in this proxy statement/prospectus, that may or may not actually occur and do not attempt to forecast certain compensation actions that may occur before the Effective Time, including any additional equity award grants, issuances, vesting events or forfeitures that may occur prior to the Effective Time. As a result, the amounts, if any, actually received by a Spirit named executive officer may materially differ from the amounts set forth in the table below.

Golden Parachute Compensation

105

The estimated amount of each such payment is shown in the following table:

106

107

Board of Directors and Management of Boeing Following Completion of the Merger

Upon completion of the Merger, the directors and executive officers of Boeing are expected to continue in their current positions, other than as may be publicly announced by Boeing in the normal course.

On July 30, 2024, the Boeing Board elected Robert K. “Kelly” Ortberg to serve as President and Chief Executive Officer and as a member of the Boeing Board, in each case effective as of August 8, 2024. Mr. Ortberg, 64, brings to the Boeing Board more than 35 years of aerospace and defense industry experience with deep expertise in operational and technology leadership, manufacturing, engineering, strategy, innovation, and global management. His extensive background as a senior executive includes his role as Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Rockwell Collins, Inc., a leading provider of avionics and communications systems, between 2015 and 2018, where he was instrumental in driving the company’s growth and technological innovation, including the expansion of its product lines and global market presence. Mr. Ortberg also played a crucial role in overseeing Rockwell Collins’ advancement in high-technology product development and operational excellence, which involved navigating complex regulatory and safety requirements. Mr. Ortberg’s leadership—with a focus on customer value, workforce development and a safety-driven culture—was pivotal during a transformative period for Rockwell Collins, including its successful integration into United Technologies Corporation and the formation of Collins Aerospace, where he also served as the Chief Executive Officer between 2018 and 2020. Following his retirement from Collins Aerospace, he served as a Special Advisor to the office of the Chief Executive Officer for RTX Corporation (formerly Raytheon Technologies Corporation), an aerospace and defense company that provides advanced systems and services for commercial, military and government customers worldwide, between 2020 and 2021, where he provided valuable insights on a wide range of strategic and business matters. Mr. Ortberg also serves on the board of Aptiv PLC and during the past five years served on the board of RTX Corporation. His significant expertise in aerospace technology, coupled with his experience in managing and integrating sophisticated technological systems and driving innovation in a highly regulated industry, equips him to contribute effectively to the Board’s strategy and oversight. Mr. Ortberg earned a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Iowa.

On November 14, 2024, the Boeing Board elected Mortimer J. “Tim” Buckley to serve as a member of the Boeing Board, effective as of January 1, 2025. Mr. Buckley, 55, brings to the Board more than 30 years of senior leadership experience, with extensive expertise in investment management, financial oversight, cybersecurity and digitalization, and corporate governance. As the former Chairman and CEO of Vanguard, one of the world’s largest investment management firms with nearly $10 trillion in assets under management and more than 20,000 employees, Mr. Buckley has a deep understanding of the global financial markets, asset management strategies, and investor perspectives, and played a pivotal role in advancing the firm’s commitment to delivering long-term value to clients. He guided Vanguard through changing market dynamics, shifting regulatory environments, and significant technological transformation. Prior to his role as Chairman and CEO from 2019 to 2024, Mr. Buckley held several key senior leadership positions at Vanguard between 2001 and 2018, including as Chief Investment Officer, where he oversaw the firm’s internally managed stock, bond and money market portfolios as well as investment research and methodology, and as Chief Information Officer, where he led the implementation of billion-dollar IT platforms. In his career, he built out the firm’s $350 billion digital advice businesses and $2 trillion exchange-traded funds franchise, globalized investment management, enhanced the firm’s artificial intelligence, and prioritized cybersecurity and digital capabilities globally. Mr. Buckley also serves on the board of Pfizer Inc.

108

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger

Overview

The following describes the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Merger to U.S. Holders (as defined below) of Spirit Common Stock. The following description is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), the Treasury Regulations promulgated under the Code and judicial and administrative interpretations of those laws, in each case as in effect and available as of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus and all of which are subject to change or differing interpretations, possibly with retroactive effect. Any such change or differing interpretation could affect the tax consequences described below. There can be no assurance that the IRS or courts will not adopt a position that is contrary to the following description.

The following description is limited to U.S. Holders who hold their Spirit Common Stock as a “capital asset” (generally, property held for investment purposes). The following description does not address all tax considerations that may be relevant to a particular type of person in light of their particular circumstances. In particular, the following description does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Merger to persons subject to special treatment under the U.S. federal income tax laws, such as:

In addition, the following description does not address (i) any U.S. federal non-income tax consequences of the Merger, including estate, gift or other tax consequences; (ii) any state, local or non-U.S. tax consequences of the Merger; or (iii) the tax on net investment income or the alternative minimum tax.

If an entity (or an arrangement) treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds Spirit Common Stock, the tax treatment of a partner in the partnership generally will depend on the status of the partner, the activities of the partnership and certain determinations made at the partner level. Partnerships and partners in such a partnership should consult their own tax advisors about the tax consequences of the Merger to them.

109

For purposes of the following description, a “U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of Spirit Common Stock that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:

DETERMINING THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER MAY BE COMPLEX. U.S. HOLDERS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS WITH RESPECT TO THE U.S. FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL AND NON-U.S. TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER IN LIGHT OF THEIR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger in General

The U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Merger will depend primarily upon whether the Merger qualifies as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code. It is possible that, because it is structured as a transaction involving Spirit Stockholders’ receipt of consideration solely in the form of Boeing Common Stock (other than cash received in lieu of fractional shares of Boeing Common Stock), the Merger may qualify as such a “reorganization.”

For the reasons discussed below, however, no assurance can be given that the IRS will not challenge the treatment of the Merger as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code or that a court would not sustain such a challenge.

The Merger is not conditioned on a ruling from IRS or an opinion of counsel that the Merger qualifies as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code, and neither Boeing nor Spirit or any of their respective advisors or affiliates makes any representations or provides any assurances in the Merger Agreement regarding the tax consequences of the Merger, including whether the Merger qualifies as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code.

Furthermore, in the Merger Agreement, Boeing and Spirit did not agree or represent that either of them intends for the Merger to qualify as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code and the Merger Agreement does not contain any covenants regarding the parties’ reporting of the treatment of the Merger on any tax return. Neither Boeing nor Spirit agreed in the Merger Agreement to take any actions required to support, or to refrain from any actions that would jeopardize, the Merger’s qualification as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code.

There are also significant legal and factual doubts concerning the qualification of the Merger as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code. In particular, it is unclear how the IRS would view various transactions and payments that exist or have been made between Boeing and Spirit and may exist or have been made at the Effective Time for purposes of qualification of the Merger as a “reorganization.”

Accordingly, unless Boeing and Spirit receive the Ruling from the IRS (as discussed in “—IRS Private Letter Ruling” below), U.S. Holders should assume that the Merger will not qualify as a

110

“reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code and that the Merger will be treated as a taxable transaction even though there is a possibility that the Merger could be treated as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code.

Prior to the Closing, Boeing and Spirit intend to provide U.S. Holders with additional information regarding whether or not they intend to treat the Merger as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code.

IRS Private Letter Ruling

It is not a condition to the Merger that Boeing or Spirit receives a private letter ruling from the IRS regarding the qualification of the Merger as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code. Nevertheless, Boeing and Spirit filed with the IRS on December 20, 2024 the Ruling Request to request a private letter ruling to the effect that the Merger qualifies as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code.

It is possible that the IRS will not agree to consider the Ruling Request. It is also possible that the IRS, after considering the request for the Ruling, will not agree to issue the Ruling or will issue a private letter ruling that does not conclude that the Merger qualifies as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code. In addition, the Ruling may not address all of the issues that are relevant to the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the Merger as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code. It is further possible that the IRS would consider the request for the Ruling, but would not do so in time to provide the Ruling prior to the Effective Time. Accordingly, there can be no assurance as to whether or when Boeing and Spirit will receive the Ruling.

Assuming that Boeing and Spirit receive the Ruling, the Ruling would be based upon and rely on, among other things, various facts and assumptions, as well as certain representations, statements and undertakings of Spirit and Boeing, including facts, assumptions, representations, statements and undertakings relating to the past and future conduct of the companies’ respective businesses and other matters. If any of these facts, assumptions, representations and statements are or become inaccurate or incomplete, or if any such undertaking is not complied with, Boeing and Spirit may not be able to rely on the Ruling, and the conclusions reached in the Ruling could be jeopardized.

Notwithstanding receipt by Boeing and Spirit of the Ruling, the IRS could determine on audit that the Merger is taxable for U.S. federal income tax purposes if it determines that any of the facts, assumptions, representations, statements and undertakings upon which the Ruling was based are incorrect or have been violated, or if it concludes, on the basis of issues not addressed in the Ruling, that the Merger does not qualify as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code. Accordingly, even if Boeing and Spirit were to receive the Ruling, there can be no assurance that the IRS would not assert that the Merger does not qualify as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code, or that a court would not sustain such a challenge to the Merger’s qualification as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code.

If Boeing and Spirit do not ultimately receive the Ruling, U.S. Holders should assume that the Merger will not qualify as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code and that the Merger will be treated as a taxable transaction even though there is a possibility that the Merger could be treated as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code.

If Boeing and Spirit timely receive the Ruling to the satisfaction of Boeing and Spirit, Boeing and Spirit intend to report the Merger for U.S. federal income tax purposes in a manner consistent with the qualification of the Merger as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code. If Boeing and Spirit do not timely receive the Ruling to the satisfaction of Boeing and Spirit, Boeing and Spirit intend to report the Merger as a taxable transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes (and not as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code).

111

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger to U.S. Holders of Spirit Common Stock

Tax Consequences if the Merger Does Not Qualify as a Reorganization.

If the Merger does not qualify as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code, the receipt of Boeing Common Stock (and cash in lieu of a fractional share of Boeing Common Stock) in exchange for Spirit Common Stock in the Merger will be a taxable transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In such a case, a U.S. Holder of Spirit Common Stock generally will recognize gain or loss, as applicable, equal to the difference between (i) the sum of the fair market value of the Boeing Common Stock received by such U.S. Holder in the Merger, if any, plus the amount of cash received by such U.S. Holder in the Merger in lieu of a fractional share of Boeing Common Stock, if any, and (ii) such U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in its Spirit Common Stock surrendered. If a U.S. Holder acquired a share of Spirit Common Stock by purchase, such U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in such share generally will equal the amount that such U.S. Holder paid for such share. Gain or loss will be determined separately for each block of shares of Spirit Common Stock (that is, shares acquired at the same cost in a single transaction). Such gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder’s holding period in such shares of Spirit Common Stock is more than one year as of the effective date of the Merger. A reduced tax rate on capital gain generally will apply to long-term capital gain of a non-corporate U.S. Holder. There are limitations on the deductibility of capital losses.

Tax Consequences if the Merger Qualifies as a Reorganization.

If, contrary to the discussion above, the Merger were to qualify as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code, the following tax consequences would result for U.S. Holders of Spirit Common Stock: