0001829311
true
Responses to SEC Comments
0001829311
2021-09-01
2022-05-31
0001829311
2022-05-31
0001829311
2021-08-31
0001829311
NONE:RevenueFromSaleOfMiningEquipmentMember
2022-03-01
2022-05-31
0001829311
NONE:RevenueFromSaleOfMiningEquipmentMember
2021-03-01
2021-05-31
0001829311
NONE:RevenueFromSaleOfMiningEquipmentMember
2021-09-01
2022-05-31
0001829311
NONE:RevenueFromSaleOfMiningEquipmentMember
2020-09-01
2021-05-31
0001829311
NONE:RevenueNetMiningMember
2022-03-01
2022-05-31
0001829311
NONE:RevenueNetMiningMember
2021-03-01
2021-05-31
0001829311
NONE:RevenueNetMiningMember
2021-09-01
2022-05-31
0001829311
NONE:RevenueNetMiningMember
2020-09-01
2021-05-31
0001829311
2022-03-01
2022-05-31
0001829311
2021-03-01
2021-05-31
0001829311
2020-09-01
2021-05-31
0001829311
NONE:CostOfSalesMiningEquipmentMember
2022-03-01
2022-05-31
0001829311
NONE:CostOfSalesMiningEquipmentMember
2021-03-01
2021-05-31
0001829311
NONE:CostOfSalesMiningEquipmentMember
2021-09-01
2022-05-31
0001829311
NONE:CostOfSalesMiningEquipmentMember
2020-09-01
2021-05-31
0001829311
NONE:CostOfSalesMiningMember
2022-03-01
2022-05-31
0001829311
NONE:CostOfSalesMiningMember
2021-03-01
2021-05-31
0001829311
NONE:CostOfSalesMiningMember
2021-09-01
2022-05-31
0001829311
NONE:CostOfSalesMiningMember
2020-09-01
2021-05-31
0001829311
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2020-08-31
0001829311
us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember
2020-08-31
0001829311
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember
2020-08-31
0001829311
2020-08-31
0001829311
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2020-11-30
0001829311
us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember
2020-11-30
0001829311
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember
2020-11-30
0001829311
2020-11-30
0001829311
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2021-02-28
0001829311
us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember
2021-02-28
0001829311
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember
2021-02-28
0001829311
2021-02-28
0001829311
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2021-08-31
0001829311
us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember
2021-08-31
0001829311
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember
2021-08-31
0001829311
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2021-11-30
0001829311
us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember
2021-11-30
0001829311
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember
2021-11-30
0001829311
2021-11-30
0001829311
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2022-02-28
0001829311
us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember
2022-02-28
0001829311
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember
2022-02-28
0001829311
2022-02-28
0001829311
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2020-09-01
2020-11-30
0001829311
us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember
2020-09-01
2020-11-30
0001829311
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember
2020-09-01
2020-11-30
0001829311
2020-09-01
2020-11-30
0001829311
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2020-12-01
2021-02-28
0001829311
us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember
2020-12-01
2021-02-28
0001829311
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember
2020-12-01
2021-02-28
0001829311
2020-12-01
2021-02-28
0001829311
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2021-03-01
2021-05-31
0001829311
us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember
2021-03-01
2021-05-31
0001829311
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember
2021-03-01
2021-05-31
0001829311
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2021-09-01
2021-11-30
0001829311
us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember
2021-09-01
2021-11-30
0001829311
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember
2021-09-01
2021-11-30
0001829311
2021-09-01
2021-11-30
0001829311
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2021-12-01
2022-02-28
0001829311
us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember
2021-12-01
2022-02-28
0001829311
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember
2021-12-01
2022-02-28
0001829311
2021-12-01
2022-02-28
0001829311
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2022-03-01
2022-05-31
0001829311
us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember
2022-03-01
2022-05-31
0001829311
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember
2022-03-01
2022-05-31
0001829311
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2021-05-31
0001829311
us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember
2021-05-31
0001829311
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember
2021-05-31
0001829311
2021-05-31
0001829311
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2022-05-31
0001829311
us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember
2022-05-31
0001829311
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember
2022-05-31
0001829311
NONE:MinersAndMiningEquipmentMember
2021-09-01
2022-05-31
0001829311
us-gaap:MachineryAndEquipmentMember
srt:MinimumMember
2021-09-01
2022-05-31
0001829311
us-gaap:MachineryAndEquipmentMember
srt:MaximumMember
2021-09-01
2022-05-31
0001829311
us-gaap:OfficeEquipmentMember
2021-09-01
2022-05-31
0001829311
2022-04-15
0001829311
2022-05-15
0001829311
2021-09-01
2022-02-28
0001829311
NONE:InnovativeDigitalMember
2021-09-01
2022-05-31
0001829311
NONE:InnovativeDigitalMember
2022-05-31
0001829311
NONE:InnovativeDigitalMember
2021-08-31
0001829311
NONE:ClassAWarrantsMember
2021-08-31
0001829311
NONE:ClassBWarrantsMember
2022-05-31
0001829311
NONE:ClassAWarrantsMember
2022-05-31
0001829311
NONE:ClassC1WarrantsMember
2022-05-31
0001829311
NONE:ClassC2WarrantsMember
2022-05-31
0001829311
srt:MinimumMember
2022-05-31
0001829311
srt:MaximumMember
2022-05-31
0001829311
NONE:InvestmentBankingFirmMember
2021-09-01
2022-05-31
0001829311
NONE:InvestmentBankingFirmMember
2022-05-31
0001829311
NONE:CompanyEmployeeMember
2021-09-01
2022-05-31
0001829311
NONE:CompanyEmployeeMember
2022-05-31
0001829311
NONE:UnitOfferingMember
NONE:AccreditedInvestorsMember
2021-09-01
2022-05-31
0001829311
NONE:UnitOfferingMember
NONE:AccreditedInvestorsMember
2022-05-31
0001829311
NONE:UnitOfferingMember
2021-09-01
2022-05-31
0001829311
NONE:UnitOfferingMember
NONE:InvestmentBankingFirmMember
2021-09-01
2022-05-31
0001829311
NONE:UnitOfferingMember
NONE:InvestmentBankingFirmMember
2022-05-31
0001829311
NONE:ExecutiveOfficerAndDirectorMember
2021-09-01
2022-05-31
0001829311
NONE:EquipmentSupplierMember
2022-05-31
iso4217:USD
xbrli:shares
iso4217:USD
xbrli:shares
xbrli:pure
As filed with the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2022.
Registration No. 333-266348
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_________________
FORM S-1/A
Amendment
No. 1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
_________________
BITMINE
IMMERSION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
7374 |
|
84-3986354 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
2030 Powers Ferry Road SE,
Suite 212,
Atlanta, Georgia 30339
Telephone: (404) 816-8240
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)
_________________
Jonathan Bates
c/o Bitmine Immersion Technologies,
Inc.
2030 Powers Ferry Road SE, Suite 212,
Atlanta, Georgia 30339
Telephone: (404) 816-8240
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)
_________________
Copies of all communications,
including communications sent to agent for service, should be sent to:
Robert J. Mottern, Esq.
Davis Gillett Mottern & Sims, LLC
545 Dutch Valley Road, NE, Suite A
Atlanta, Georgia 30324
Telephone: (404) 607-6933
_________________
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale
to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this registration statement.
If any of the securities being registered on this
Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following box: ☒
If this Form is filed to register additional securities
for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed
pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement
number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed
pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement
number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐
If delivery of the Prospectus is expected to be
made pursuant to Rule 434, check the following box. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is
a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.
See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,”
and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer |
|
☐ |
|
Accelerated filer |
|
☐ |
Non-accelerated
filer |
|
☒ |
|
Smaller reporting company |
|
☒ |
|
|
|
|
Emerging growth company |
|
☒ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check
mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting
standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act.
The registrant hereby amends this registration
statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with section 8(a) of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or until this registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission,
acting pursuant to said section 8(a), may determine.
The information in this
preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not
soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS |
|
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION DATED NOVEMBER__,
2022 |
BITMINE IMMERSION TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.
14,887,800
Shares of
Common Stock
This prospectus relates to the offer and resale
of up to an aggregate of 14,887,800 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share of Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (“Bitmine,”
“the Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) consisting of
(a) 5,457,000 shares (the “Placement
Shares”) issued in various private placement transactions, including a private placement offering (the “Private Placement”)
of Bitmine that terminated on June 27, 2022,
(b) 550,000 shares of common issuable upon exercise
of 550,000 Class A Warrants (the “Class A Warrant Shares”),
(c) 550,000 shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of 550,000 Class B Warrants (the “Class B Warrant Shares”),
(d) 4,147,600 shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of 4,147,600 Class C-1 Warrants (the “Class C-1 Warrant Shares”) issued in the Private Placement,
(e) 4,147,600 shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of 4,147,600 Class C-2 Warrants (the “Class C-2 Warrant Shares”) issued the Private Placement, and
(f) 25,600 shares of common stock issuable upon
the exercise of 25,600 Class C-3 Warrants issued to Sutter Securities, Inc. in the Private Placement (the “Class C-3 Warrant Shares,”
and with the Class A Warrant Shares, Class B Warrant Shares, Class C-1 Warrant Shares and Class C-2 Warrant Shares, the “Warrant
Shares”) issued in the Private Placement.
The holders of the Placement Shares and the Warrant
Shares are each referred to herein as a “Selling Stockholder” and collectively as the “Selling Stockholders.”
This prospectus also covers any additional shares
of common stock that may become issuable upon any anti-dilution adjustment pursuant to the terms of the Warrants issued to the Selling
Stockholders by reason of stock splits, stock dividends, and other events described therein.
The Selling Stockholders, or their respective transferees,
pledgees, donees or other successors-in-interest, may sell the Placement Shares or the Warrant Shares through public or private transactions
at prevailing market prices, at prices related to prevailing market prices or at privately negotiated prices. The Selling Stockholders
may sell any, all or none of the securities offered by this prospectus, and we do not know when or in what amount the Selling Stockholders
may sell their Placement Shares or Warrant Shares hereunder following the effective date of this registration statement. We provide more
information about how a Selling Stockholder may sell its Placement Shares or Warrant Shares in the section titled “Plan of Distribution”
on page 92.
We are registering the Placement Shares and Warrant
Shares on behalf of the Selling Stockholders, to be offered and sold by them from time to time. We will not receive any proceeds from
the sale of our common stock by the Selling Stockholders in the offering described in this prospectus. We cannot predict when and in what
amounts or if the Warrants will be exercised. We have agreed to bear all of the expenses incurred in connection with the registration
of the Placement Shares and the Warrant Shares. The Selling Stockholders will pay or assume discounts, commissions, fees of underwriters,
selling brokers or dealer managers and similar expenses, if any, incurred for the sale of the Placement Shares and the Warrant Shares.
Our common stock is quoted on the OTC Pink Market
(“OTC Pink”) operated by the OTC Markets Group, Inc. under the symbol “BMNR”. On November 9, 2022, the last reported
sale of our common stock was $0.85. There is a limited public trading market for our common stock. You are urged to obtain current market
quotations for the common stock. The exercise prices of the Class A Warrants, Class B Warrants, Class C-1 Warrants, Class C-2 Warrants
and Class C-3 Warrants are $2.00, $5.00, $2.00, $4.00 and $1.25, respectively, and it is unlikely that any of the Selling Stockholders
will exercise the Warrants until the market price exceeds the exercise price.
Until such time as our common stock is quoted
on the over-the-counter bulletin board ("OTCBB"), the OTCQX, the OTCQB or listed on any national securities exchange or automated
interdealer quotation system, the shares covered by this prospectus will be sold by the Selling Shareholders from time to time at the
bid price of the shares as quoted on the OTC Pink if sold on the OTC Pink and at a range of $0.44 to $2.00 per share if sold in any other
manner, such as a private sale. If and when our common stock is regularly quoted on the over-the-counter bulletin board, the OTCQX, or
the OTCQB or listed on any national securities exchange or automated interdealer quotation system, the Selling Shareholders may sell their
respective shares of common stock, from time to time, at prevailing market prices or in privately negotiated transactions.
As of November 4, 2022, our executive officers,
directors, significant shareholders and affiliated persons and entities collectively, beneficially owned approximately 57.5% of our outstanding
common stock and 100% of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, and as a result control 63.4% of the votes on any matter submitted
to a vote of shareholders. As a result, these persons and entities have the ability to exercise control over most matters that require
approval by our stockholders, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions, and will continue
to exercise such control if all of the common stock registered herein are sold by the Selling Stockholders.
We are an “emerging growth company”
and a “smaller reporting company” as such terms are defined under federal securities laws, and, as such have elected to take
advantage of certain reduced public company reporting requirements for this prospectus and may elect to do so in future filings.
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree
of risk. Please read “Risk Factors” beginning on page 9 of this prospectus.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission
nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus.
Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
The date of this prospectus is
November , 2022
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS
This prospectus describes the general manner
in which the Selling Stockholders may offer from time to time up to 14,887,800 shares of common stock held by Selling Stockholders, consisting
of (a) 5,457,000 Placement Shares, (b) 550,000 Class A Warrant Shares, (c) 550,000 Class B Warrant Shares, (d) 4,147,600 Class
C-1 Warrant Shares, (c) 4,147,600 Class C-2 Warrant Shares, and (d) 25,600 Class C-3 Warrant Shares. You should rely only on the information
contained in this prospectus and the related exhibits, any prospectus supplement or amendment thereto and the documents incorporated
by reference, or to which we have referred you, before making your investment decision. Neither we nor the Selling Stockholders have
authorized anyone to provide you with different information. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should
not rely on it. This prospectus, any prospectus supplement or amendments thereto do not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation
of an offer to purchase, the common stock offered by this prospectus, any prospectus supplement or amendments thereto in any jurisdiction
to or from any person to whom or from whom it is unlawful to make such offer or solicitation of an offer in such jurisdiction. You should
not assume that the information contained in this prospectus, any prospectus supplement or amendments thereto, as well as information
we have previously filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), is accurate as of any date other than
the date on the front cover of the applicable document.
If necessary, the specific manner in which the
shares of common stock may be offered and sold will be described in a supplement to this prospectus, which supplement may also add, update
or change any of the information contained in this prospectus. To the extent there is a conflict between the information contained in
this prospectus and any prospectus supplement, you should rely on the information in such prospectus supplement, provided that if any
statement in one of these documents is inconsistent with a statement in another document having a later date — for example,
a document incorporated by reference in this prospectus or any prospectus supplement — the statement in the document having
the later date modifies or supersedes the earlier statement.
Neither the delivery of this prospectus nor any
distribution of common stock pursuant to this prospectus shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no
change in the information set forth or incorporated by reference into this prospectus or in our affairs since the date of this prospectus.
Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since such date.
Unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms
“Bitmine,” “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Bitmine Immersion Technologies,
Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries.
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information contained
elsewhere in this prospectus, and does not contain all of the information that you should consider before investing in our common stock.
This summary is qualified in its entirety by, and should be read in conjunction with, the more detailed information appearing elsewhere
in this prospectus. You should read this entire prospectus carefully, including the information set forth in the sections titled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our financial
statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus, before making an investment decision. Unless the context requires
otherwise, references in this prospectus to “we,” “us,” “our,” “our company,” the “Company”
or similar terminology refer to Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. Unless otherwise, indicated, all share amounts and per share amounts
in this prospectus and our financial statements and related notes thereto reflect a net 1 for 200 reverse-split of the Company’s
common shares effective as of April 27, 2021 (consisting of a 1 for 40,000 reverse-split, with all fractional shares rounded up to the
nearest whole share, and immediately after a 200 for 1 forward stock split).
Management and History
A predecessor to the Company was incorporated in
the state of Nevada on August 16, 1995 as Interactive Lighting Showrooms, Inc. On June 30, 2004, the predecessor changed its name to Am/Tex
Oil and Gas, Inc. On January 24, 2008, the predecessor changed its name to Critical Point Resources, Inc. On February 2, 2012, the predecessor
changed its name to Renewable Energy Solution Systems, Inc. On May 18, 2012, the predecessor changed its name to RES Systems, Inc. On
May 23, 2013, the predecessor changed its name back to Renewable Energy Solution Systems, Inc.
On April 6, 2020, the predecessor redomiciled in
the State of Delaware by merging with a Delaware subsidiary named RESS Merger Corp., which was the successor in the merger. Thereafter,
effective July 15, 2020, the predecessor and the Company effected a holding company reorganization pursuant to Section 251(g) of the Delaware
General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) under which RESS Merger Corp. merged with RESS of Delaware, Inc., a Delaware subsidiary
of RESS Merger Corp., and all shareholders of RESS Merger Corp. received one share of common stock of the Company, another Delaware subsidiary
of RESS Merger Corp., for each share that they previously held in RESS Merger Corp., and RESS of Delaware, Inc. (the successor in the
merger with RESS Merger Corp.) becoming a subsidiary of the Company.
Effective July 17, 2020, the Company divested RESS
of Delaware, Inc. to Sterling Acquisitions I, Inc. (“Sterling”), which is owned by the chief executive officer of the Company,
pursuant to an agreement under Sterling (i) purchased Ten Million (10,000,000) common shares of the Company for an aggregate price of
Ten Dollars ($10), and (ii) was issued Ten Million (10,000,000) Class A Warrants at an aggregate price of Ten Dollars ($10), and (iii).
Ten Million (10,000,000) Class B Warrants at an aggregate price of Ten Dollars ($10). In addition, the Company agreed to pay a fee of
$1,000 to Sterling to cover the expenses associated with the maintenance of RESS of Delaware, Inc. until such time as a certificate of
dissolution is filed with the state of Delaware.
By a written consent dated July 16, 2021, holders
of a majority of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock approved a resolution to appoint Jonathan Bates, Raymond Mow,
Michael Maloney and Seth Bayles to the board of directors of the Company, and to appoint Jonathan Bates as Chairman, Seth Bayles as Corporate
Secretary, Raymond Mow as Chief Financial Officer, and Ryan Ramnath as Chief Operating Officer (collectively, the “New O&Ds”).
Erik S. Nelson remained a director and the chief executive officer. At the same time, the shareholders approved the issuance of 32,994,999
shares of common stock in the Company’s offering of common stock at $0.015 per share, and the grant of 4,750,000 shares for services,
which were valued at $0.015 per share. As a result of the foregoing stock issuances, the New O&Ds (or entities controlled by them)
collectively acquired 24,893,877 shares of common stock, which represented approximately 62% of the issued and outstanding shares at the
time.
The appointment of certain of the New O&Ds
to the Company’s board, and issuance to the New O&Ds of a controlling interest in the Company, were made in order to enable
the Company to enter the business of creating a hosting center for Bitcoin mining computers primarily utilizing immersion cooling
technology, as well mining the Bitcoin digital currency for its own account. Prior to the change of control to the New O&Ds, the Company
was a shell company.
Company Overview
Since July 2021, our business has been as a
blockchain technology company that is building out industrial scale digital asset mining, equipment sales and hosting operations.
The Company’s primary business is hosting third-party equipment used in mining of digital asset coins and tokens, specifically
Bitcoin, as well as self-mining for its own account. Our state-of-the-art facilities will be specifically designed and constructed for
housing advanced mining equipment. Our data centers will provide power, racks, proprietary thermodynamic management (heat dissipation
and airflow management), redundant connectivity, 24/7 security, as well as software which provide infrastructure management and custom
firmware that boost performance and energy efficiency.
We plan to operate our data centers using immersion
cooling technology. Immersion cooling is the process of submerging computer components (or full servers) in a thermally, but not electrically,
conductive liquid (dielectric coolant) allowing higher heat transfer performance than air and many other benefits. Immersion cooling can
be up to 95% more efficient than standard air cooling, producing an estimated PUE (power usage effectiveness) of 1.05. This cooler environment
has been shown to extend machine lives by 30% or longer.
We initially decided to locate our initial
facilities in Trinidad, because it has some of the cheapest electricity in the world due to its abundant supplies of oil and gas and
because some of our technical staff is located there. We have entered into an agreement with Telecommunications Services of Trinidad
& Tobago Limited (“TSTT”), the largest and oldest telecom company in Trinidad, to co-locate up to 125 800 kw containers
for hosting digital asset miners. TSTT has up to 93 potential locations for co-location of our containers. Under the agreement, we have
the option, but not obligation, to co-locate containers at our own pace. We pay a fixed amount per container, plus the actual electricity
costs incurred by our containers in the amount billed to TSTT by the local utility without any markup. The agreement provides that our
hosting containers will be billed for electricity usage at the local utility’s standard rates, which is the greater of 3.5 cents
per kwh or 75% of the declared reserve capacity, which is equal to the customer’s highest expected monthly kilovolt-ampere demand
at $7.40. The term of the agreement expires on October 14, 2031. We have the right to terminate our agreement with TSTT at any time
that the price for electricity consumption exceeds $0.05 per kwh.
Until our permanent hosting facilities are
operational, we are temporarily leasing space for a small number of ASIC computers with a co-host. We intend to move all of our currently
owned and customer owned miners to our new TSTT hosting facilities once they are operational.
In October 2022, we completed the installation
of initial hosting containers under our agreement with TSTT. However, prior to commencing operations, TSTT advised us that the utility
had refused to honor its existing agreement with TSTT with respect to electricity supplied to our pilot hosting site, and instead indicated
that the rate would be approximately $0.09 per kwh. TSTT has informed us that it does not believe that its contract with the local utility
entitles it to vary the rate it charges for the use of electricity and has protested the decision. At this time, we are unable to predict
how this dispute between TSTT and the utility will be resolved, what form any resolution may take or how long any resolution may take.
Accordingly, we are delaying the installation of additional containers in Trinidad until this dispute is resolved. Until the dispute
between TSTT and the utility is resolved, we intend to focus our efforts on purchasing or developing hosting locations in the United
States and Canada, either directly or in joint ventures with other industry participants.
In light of the recent developments in Trinidad,
we are focusing our efforts in the near term on developing hosting locations in the United States and Canada. We are exploring situations
where medium to long-term power agreements may be available at affordable prices, whether using traditional power sources such as coal
or natural gas, as well as environmentally friendly sources such as hydroelectric, wind and solar-backed projects, which might allow
us to generate collateral revenue from the sale of excess power to the local utility grid and from the generation of saleable carbon
credits.
We recently entered into a joint arrangement
whereby we would contributed one immersion contain and six transformers, and sold four immersion containers to a joint venture with a
third party that has procured a location and a medium or long-term power purchase agreement in Pecos, Texas.
Our digital asset mining operation is focused on
the generation of digital assets by solving complex cryptographic algorithms to validate transactions on specific digital asset network
blockchains, which is commonly referred to as “mining.” Mining requires the use of specialized
computers equipped with application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chips (known as “miners”) to solve complex cryptographic
algorithms in support of the Bitcoin blockchain (in a process known as “solving a block”) in exchange for digital asset rewards
(primarily bitcoin). Whether we are hosting our client’s computers or mining for our own account with our own computers, the miners
participate in “mining pools” organized by “mining pool operators” in which we or our clients share mining power
(known as “hash rate”) with the hash rate generated by other miners participating in the pool to earn digital asset rewards.
The mining pool operator provides a service that coordinates the computing power of the independent mining enterprises participating in
the mining pool. Fees are paid to the mining pool operator to cover the costs of maintaining the pool. The pool uses software that coordinates
the pool members’ mining power, identifies new block rewards, records how much hash rate each participant contributes to the pool,
and assigns digital asset rewards earned by the pool among its participants in proportion to the hash rate each participant contributed
to the pool in connection with solving a block.
Our digital asset self-mining activity competes
with a myriad of mining operations throughout the world to complete new blocks in the blockchain and earn the reward in the form of an
established unit of a digital asset. Revenue from digital asset mining and hosting third party
digital asset miners are impacted by volatility in bitcoin prices, as well as increases in the Bitcoin blockchain’s network hash
rate resulting from the growth in the overall quantity and quality of miners working to solve blocks on the Bitcoin blockchain and the
difficulty index associated with the secure hashing algorithm employed in solving the blocks. Gross profits from digital asset mining
are primarily impacted by the cost of electricity to operate the miners and to a lesser extent by other operating costs. While
we expect to sell or exchange a portion of the digital assets we mine to fund our growth strategies or for general corporate purposes,
we may hold our digital assets as investments in anticipation of continued adoption of digital assets as a “store of value”
and a more efficient medium of exchange than traditional fiat currencies.
As the demand for digital assets increases and
digital assets become more widely accepted, there is an increasing demand for professional-grade, scalable infrastructure to support growth
of the blockchain ecosystem. We expect to continually evaluate the performance of our data centers, including our ability to access additional
megawatts of electric power and to expand our total self-mining and customer and related party hosting hash rates.
We also generate revenues from the advantageous
purchase and sale of equipment used for digital asset mining and hosting. We have relationships with some suppliers that enable us to
acquire highly desired equipment at attractive prices, which we plan to resell to third parties. In most cases, resales of digital asset
mining equipment would be to our hosting customers, which have the dual benefit of generating short-term gross profits from the equipment
sale as well as growing the customer base of our hosting business. We have recently resold some hosting equipment in Trinidad to third
parties that we determined would not be need in the short-term due to the dispute between TSTT and the local utility described above.
The primary factors that will impact future
hosting revenues include: (i) the price of bitcoin, since hosting revenues are primarily a percentage of bitcoin mined by clients; (ii)
the completion of operational hosting facilities, as potential hosting clients have been reluctant to sign contracts prior to the date
the Company has a fully operational hosting facility; and (iii) the availability of attractive electricity prices, since power usage is
the primary marginal cost for any mining operation. Our hosting revenues will also be impacted by the resolution of the dispute between
TSTT and the local utility regarding the electricity rate that will be charged our co-location facilities in Trinidad, as well as by the
timing of the resolution.
The primary factors that will impact proprietary
mining revenues include the availability of mining equipment suitable for the Company’s immersion hosting environment at attractive
prices and available capacity in the Company’s hosting facilities.
The primary factors that will impact resales
of mining equipment include the availability of equipment at attractive prices and the number of participants willing to enter the mining
business or expand their existing operations, which is highly correlated to the margin from mining, as determined by the market price
of bitcoin and prevailing energy costs. Also, our resales of mining equipment will be impacted by the existence of hosting capacity with
attractive electricity rates in our hosting operations.
Risks Affecting Us
Our business is subject to a number of risks and
uncertainties that you should understand before making an investment decision. These risks are discussed more fully in the section entitled
“Risk Factors,” following this prospectus summary. These include:
· |
We have a history of losses and expect significant increases in our costs, expenses and losses. As we continue to invest in our development efforts, improve our operational, financial and management information systems, hire additional personnel, obtain, maintain, we expect to incur losses for at least the foreseeable future, which could harm our business and future prospects. |
|
|
· |
We may never generate positive net cash flow or become profitable or, if we achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain it. |
· |
We may identify material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fail to maintain proper
and effective internal controls, which may impair our ability to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis. |
|
|
· |
Until our operations become self-sustaining, of which there is no assurance, we will be required to raise additional funds, which may not be available or available on favorable terms, to remain in business. Failure to obtain this necessary capital when needed may force us to delay, limit or terminate certain of our new product development programs, commercialization efforts or other operations. |
|
|
· |
Our history of losses makes evaluating our business and future prospects difficult and may increase the risk of your investment. |
|
|
· |
The price of our stock may be volatile, and you could lose all or part of your investment. |
|
|
· |
The COVID-19 pandemic and the efforts to mitigate its impact may
have an adverse effect on our business, liquidity,
results of operations, financial condition and price of our securities. |
|
|
· |
While the supplies of most hosting and mining equipment is not a problem,
the hosting and mining industry has experienced supply disruptions in the past. Furthermore, hosting
and mining equipment in some foreign countries is not as available as it is in the United States. Our reliance on a limited base of suppliers for certain of our parts and products may result in disruptions to our supply chain and business and adversely affect our financial results. |
|
|
· |
The recent decline in the market prices of digital assets could adversely impact our business by reducing the demand for our hosting services and making our proprietary mining operations less profitable, and could severely impact our business if the price falls below the marginal cost of mining new digital assets. |
|
|
· |
A number of jurisdictions around the world have recently banned or limited the mining of digital assets within their borders, and there is a risk that we have to terminate operations at an established location due to the changing political or regulatory climate for digital asset mining. |
|
|
· |
In our proprietary mining operations, our sole source of revenue is derived from bitcoin that we
mine. Our hosting business is paid, in part, by taking a percentage of bitcoin that it mined by our hosting clients. Therefore, our
operating results are greatly influenced by the liquidity and volatility of the bitcoin market. |
|
|
· |
Many financial institutions in the United States will not open financial accounts on behalf of companies engaged in the mining, investing or trading of digital assets, typically for unspecified “compliance” reasons, and our business could be adversely impacted if we cannot maintain a traditional banking relationship. |
|
|
· |
The cryptocurrency industry is subject to a highly-evolving regulatory landscape and any adverse changes to, or our failure to comply with, any laws and regulations could adversely affect our brand, reputation, business, operating results, and financial condition. |
|
|
· |
The future development and growth of cryptocurrencies is subject to a variety of factors that are difficult to predict and evaluate. If cryptocurrencies do not grow as we expect, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be adversely affected. |
|
|
· |
The profitability of mining cryptocurrencies is very dependent on the price of electricity needed to run miners. The world is currently experiencing a spike in energy costs due to supply constraints and the Russia-Ukraine war, among other factors. If high energy costs continue, the attractiveness of Bitcoin mining may decline substantially, which would have an adverse impact on our business. |
|
|
· |
Because most of our revenues are received initially in the form of bitcoin, we need to convert our bitcoin into U.S. Dollars on a regular basis in order to pay our expenses. Accordingly, we are subject to volatility and liquidity in the bitcoin markets, and to potentially high transaction fees and market spreads to convert our bitcoin into U.S. Dollars. |
|
|
· |
Adoption of a different method of validating bitcoin transactions that utilizes less energy could have an adverse impact on the hosting and mining industry and could even render the business obsolete. |
Implications of Being an Emerging Growth Company
and a Smaller Reporting Company
We qualify as an “emerging growth company,”
as defined in the JOBS Act. For as long as we remain an emerging growth company, we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various
reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies. These provisions include, but are not limited to:
· |
being permitted to have only two years of audited financial statements and only two years of related selected financial data and management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations disclosure; |
|
|
· |
an exemption from compliance with the auditor attestation requirement in the assessment of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; |
|
|
· |
reduced disclosure about executive compensation arrangements in our periodic reports, registration statements and proxy statements; and |
|
|
· |
exemptions from the requirements to seek non-binding advisory votes on executive compensation or golden parachute arrangements. |
In addition, the JOBS Act permits emerging growth
companies to take advantage of an extended transition period to comply with new or revised accounting standards applicable to public companies.
We are not choosing to “opt out” of this provision. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (i) the
last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the completion of our IPO, (ii) the last day of the first
fiscal year in which our annual gross revenues exceed $1.07 billion, (iii) the date on which we have, during the immediately
preceding three-year period, issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt securities and (iv) the end of
any fiscal year in which the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the end of the
second quarter of that fiscal year. We have elected to take advantage of certain of the reduced disclosure obligations in the registration
statement of which this prospectus forms a part and may elect to take advantage of other reduced reporting requirements in future filings.
As a result, the information that we provide to our stockholders may be different than you might receive from other public reporting companies
in which you hold equity interests.
We are also a “smaller reporting company”
as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. We may continue to be a smaller
reporting company even after we are no longer an emerging growth company. We may take advantage of certain of the scaled disclosures available
to smaller reporting companies and will be able to take advantage of these scaled disclosures for so long as the market value of our voting
and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates is less than $250 million measured on the last business day of
our second fiscal quarter, or our annual revenue is less than $100 million during the most recently completed fiscal year and the
market value of our voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates is more than $700 million measured on the
last business day of our second fiscal quarter.
Corporate Information
A predecessor to the Company was originally incorporated
in the State of Nevada on August 16, 1995, and redomiciled in the State of Delaware on April 6, 2020. Our principal executive offices
are located at 2030 Powers Ferry Road SE, Suite 212, Atlanta, Georgia 30339, and our telephone number is (404) 816-8240. Our corporate
website address is bitminetech.io. The information contained on or accessible through our website is not a part of this prospectus,
and the inclusion of our website address in this prospectus is an inactive textual reference only.
Recent Developments
Private Placement
In December 2021 we commenced an offering of 8,000,000
Units at $1.25 per Unit (the “Private Offering”). Each Unit consists of one Placement Share, one Series C-1 Warrant and one
Series C-2 Warrant.
Each Class C-1 Warrant is exercisable to purchase
one share of the Company’s common stock until January 15, 2025 at an exercise price of $2.00 per share. The Class C-1 Warrant is
callable on thirty days’ notice by the Company for $0.01 at any time that the Company’s common stock has (i) had a closing
price greater than $4 for twenty consecutive trading days and (ii) the average daily volume in excess of 50,000 shares per day during
that period.
Each Class C-2 Warrant is exercisable to purchase
one share of the Company’s common stock until January 15, 2025 at an exercise price of $4.00 per share. The Class C-2 Warrant is
callable on thirty days’ notice by the Company for $0.01 at any time that the Company’s common stock has (i) had a closing
price greater than $7 for twenty consecutive trading days and (ii) the average daily volume in excess of 50,000 shares per day during
that period.
The Company agreed to file a registration statement
within 30 days after the termination of the Private Offering to register the resell of the Placement Shares and the Warrant Shares.
The Company terminated the Private Offering on
June 27, 2022, with 4,122,000 Units sold for gross proceeds of $5,152,500, which includes $3,340,000 of hosting equipment contributed
in kind by one investor.
THE OFFERING
|
|
|
Common Stock offered by the Selling Stockholders |
|
A total of up to 14,887,800 shares of our common stock, consisting of 5,122,000 shares of common
stock that they currently own and up to 9,420,800 shares of common stock that they have the right to acquire upon exercise of the
Warrants. |
|
|
|
Shares of Common Stock Outstanding |
|
48,548,091 shares as of November 4, 2022, excluding shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of outstanding options or warrants. |
|
|
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock by the selling stockholders. The only proceeds, if any, that we would receive is in connection with the issuance of any Warrant Shares upon the exercise of the Warrants (to the extent the Warrants are exercised for cash and not on a cashless basis). |
|
|
|
Dividend Policy |
|
We currently intend to retain our future earnings, if any, to finance the development and expansion of our business and, therefore, do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon then-existing conditions, including our results of operations and financial condition, capital requirements, business prospects, statutory and contractual restrictions on our ability to pay cash dividends, if any, and other factors our board of directors may deem relevant. See “Dividend Policy.” |
|
|
|
Plan of Distribution |
|
The Selling Stockholders may, from time to time, sell any or all of their shares of our common stock on
the stock exchange, market or trading facility on which the shares are traded or in private transactions. These sales may be at
fixed or negotiated prices. For further information, see “Plan of Distribution” beginning on page
92. |
|
|
|
Transfer Agent |
|
West Coast Stock Transfer, Inc. |
|
|
|
Pink OTC Market Symbol |
|
“BMNR” |
|
|
|
Risk Factors |
|
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should read this prospectus carefully, including the section titled “Risk Factors” and the combined and condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes to those statements included in this prospectus, before investing in our common stock |
Outstanding Shares of Common Stock
The number of shares of our common stock to
be outstanding after this offering is based on 48,548,091 shares of common stock outstanding as of November 4, 2022, and excludes:
| • | 590,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding Class A Warrants; |
| • | 590,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding Class B Warrants; |
| • | 4,147,600 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding Class C-1 Warrants; |
| • | 4,147,600 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding Class C-2 Warrants; and |
| • | 25,600 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding Class C-3 Warrants. |
RISK FACTORS
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree
of risk. You should carefully consider the following information about these risks, together with the other information appearing elsewhere
in this prospectus, including our financial statements, the notes thereto and the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” before deciding to invest in our common stock. The occurrence of
any of the following risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation, financial condition, results of operations
and future growth prospects, as well as our ability to accomplish our strategic objectives. As a result, the trading price of our
common stock could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to
us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business operations and the market price of our common stock.
Risks Related to Company’s Business and
Industry
We may not be able to obtain new hosting
and transaction processing hardware or purchase such hardware at competitive prices during times of high demand, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Historically, an increase in interest and demand
for digital assets has led to a shortage of hosting and transaction processing hardware and increased prices. Higher Bitcoin prices increase
the demand for mining equipment and increases the cost. In addition, as more companies seek to enter the mining industry, the demand for
machines may outpace supply and create mining machine equipment shortages. We and our customers and potential customers have experienced,
and may in the future experience, difficulty in obtaining new equipment or replacement components for our and their existing equipment,
including graphics processing units and application-specific integrated circuit chipsets and computer servers, which has had, and in the
future may have, a material impact on the demand for our services and associated revenue. Currently, with the restriction on digital asset
mining in China and the recent drop in digital asset prices, there is increased availability, and decreased prices, of new and used mining
equipment. However, these trends may be temporary, particularly the drop in digital asset prices, and a return to higher prices could,
once again, lead to shortages of mining equipment and an increase in prices, which could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Our business is capital intensive,
and failure to obtain the necessary capital when needed may force us to delay, limit or terminate our expansion efforts or other operations,
which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The costs of constructing, developing, operating
and maintaining digital asset mining and hosting facilities, and owning and operating a large fleet of the latest generation mining equipment
are substantial.
Our proprietary mining operations can only be successful
and ultimately profitable if the costs, including hardware and electricity costs, associated with mining digital assets are lower than
the price of the digital assets that are mined by us. Mining equipment experiences ordinary wear and tear from operation and may also
face more significant malfunctions caused by factors which may be beyond our control. As miners become degrade due to ordinary wear and
tear from usage, or are lost or damaged due to factors outside of our control, these miners will need to be repaired or replaced along
with other equipment from time to time for us to stay competitive. In addition, continued developments in ASIC miners has resulted
in constantly improvements in miners, as measured by such factors as electricity efficiency and/or price per exahash mined. Developments
in mining technology may render our miners uncompetitive before they reach the end of their useful life. Many of the new miners we
will need to purchase are made by third-party manufacturers located primarily in China. This upgrading process requires substantial capital
investment, and we may face challenges in doing so on a timely and cost-effective basis based on availability of new miners and our access
to adequate capital resources. If we are unable to obtain adequate numbers of new and replacement miners at scale, we may be unable to
remain competitive in our highly competitive and evolving industry.
Moreover, in order to grow our hosting business,
we need additional hosting facilities to increase our capacity for more miners. The costs of constructing, developing, operating and maintaining
hosting facilities and growing our hosting operations may increase in the future, which may make it more difficult for us to expand our
business and to operate our hosting facilities profitably.
We will need to raise additional funds through
equity or debt financings in order to meet our capital needs. Additional debt or equity financing may not be available when
needed or, if available, may not be available on satisfactory terms. An inability to generate sufficient cash from operations or to obtain
additional debt or equity financing would adversely affect our results of operations. Additionally, if this happens, we may not be able
to mine digital assets as efficiently or in similar amounts as our competition and, as a result, our business and financial results could
suffer.
If future prices of Bitcoin are not
sufficiently high, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected, which may have
a negative impact on the trading price of our securities.
Our financial condition and results of operations
are, and are expected to increasingly be, reliant on our ability to sell the Bitcoin we receive from mining at a price greater than
our costs to produce that Bitcoin, and our ability to sell Bitcoin that we receive as a fee for hosting services at price greater than
our cost to provide hosting services.
To the extent the cost to purchase new miners
or hosting equipment increases or our electricity costs increase, our cost to produce a single Bitcoin also increases, therefore requiring
a corresponding increase in the price of Bitcoin for us to maintain profitable operations from mining. If future prices of Bitcoin are
not sufficiently high, we may not realize the benefit of the capital expenditures we incur each time we acquire new miners and expand
our hosting environment to host those miners. If this occurs, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially
and adversely affected, which may have a negative impact on the trading price of our securities, which may have a materially adverse
impact on investors’ investment in our Company.
To the extent the cost of purchase and installation
of new hosting equipment increases, our cost to provide hosting services will also increase, therefore requiring a corresponding increase
in the price of Bitcoin for us to maintain profitable operations from hosting. If future prices of Bitcoin are not sufficiently high,
we may not realize the benefit of the capital expenditures we incur each time we expand our hosting operations. If this occurs, our
business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected, which may have a negative impact on
the trading price of our securities, which may have a materially adverse impact on investors’ investment in our Company.
Recently, the market prices of all digital
currencies have fallen substantially along with the drop in world stock exchanges. The price of Bitcoin is still sufficient to
enable us and our hosting clients to mine Bitcoin profitably; however, if the price drops much farther the marginal cost of mining
Bitcoin will exceed the value of the Bitcoin that is mined, with the result that both we and our hosting clients may be forced to
cease mining Bitcoin until it becomes profitable to do so again. The cessation of Bitcoin mining would have a materially adverse
impact on our business.
Our success depends in large part on
our ability to mine digital assets profitably and to attract customers for our hosting capabilities. Increases in power costs or our inability
to mine digital assets efficiently and to sell digital assets at favorable prices will reduce our operating margins, impact our ability
to attract customers for our services and harm our growth prospects and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Our growth depends in large part on our ability
to successfully mine digital assets and to attract customers for our hosting capabilities. We may not be able to attract customers to
our hosting capabilities for a number of reasons, including if:
|
• |
|
there is a reduction in the demand for our services due to macroeconomic factors in the markets in which we operate; |
|
• |
|
we fail to provide competitive pricing terms or effectively market them to potential customers; |
|
• |
|
we provide hosting services that are deemed by existing and potential customers or suppliers to be inferior to those of our competitors, or that fail to meet customers’ or suppliers’ ongoing and evolving program qualification standards, based on a range of factors, including available power, preferred design features, security considerations and connectivity; |
|
• |
|
businesses decide to host internally as an alternative to the use of our services; |
|
• |
|
we fail to successfully communicate the benefits of our services to potential customers; |
|
• |
|
we are unable to strengthen awareness of our brand; |
|
• |
|
we are unable to provide services that our existing and potential customers’ desire; |
|
• |
|
our customers are unable to secure an adequate supply of new generation digital asset mining equipment to host with us; |
|
• |
|
we are unable to obtain deliveries of hosting equipment, including immersion containers and transformers, which have recently been in short supply; or |
|
• |
|
we are unable to find suitable locations for hosting facilities which have electricity at competitive rates. |
If we are unable to obtain hosting
customers at favorable pricing terms or at all, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
A slowdown in the demand for blockchain technology
or blockchain hosting resources and other market and economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Adverse developments in the blockchain
industry, and in the blockchain hosting market could lead to a decrease in the demand for hosting resources, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We face risks including those related to:
|
• |
|
a decline in the adoption and use of Bitcoin and other similar digital assets within the technology industry or a decline in value of digital assets; |
|
• |
|
increased costs of complying with existing or new government regulations applicable to digital assets and other factors; |
|
• |
|
a downturn in the market for blockchain hosting space generally, which could be caused by an oversupply of or reduced demand for blockchain space; |
|
• |
|
any transition by our customers of blockchain hosting from third-party providers like us to customer-owned and operated facilities; |
|
• |
|
the rapid development of new technologies or the adoption of new industry standards that render our or our customers’ current products and services obsolete or unmarketable and, in the case of our customers, that contribute to a downturn in their businesses, increasing the likelihood of a default under their service agreements or their becoming insolvent; |
|
• |
|
a slowdown in the growth of the Internet generally as a medium for commerce and communication; |
|
• |
|
availability of an adequate supply of new generation digital asset mining equipment to enable us to mine digital assets at scale and for customers who want to host with us to be able to do so; |
|
• |
|
the degree of difficulty in mining digital assets and the trading price of such assets; and |
|
• |
|
an increase in political opposition to mining digital assets, for example due to concerns about its impact on climate change or its impact on the availability of affordable electricity to other consumers in the local market, the degree of difficulty in mining digital assets and the trading price of such assets. |
To the extent that any of these or other adverse
conditions exist, they are likely to have an adverse impact on our mining rewards and market demand and pricing for our services, which
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Additionally, we and our customers are affected
by general business and economic conditions in the United States and globally. These conditions include short-term and long-term interest
rates, inflation, money supply, political issues, legislative and regulatory changes, including the imposition of new tariffs affecting
our or our customers’ products and services, fluctuations in both debt and equity capital markets and broad trends in industry and
finance, all of which are beyond our control. Macroeconomic conditions that affect the economy and the economic outlook of the United
States and the rest of the world could adversely affect our customers and vendors, which could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Our business is heavily impacted by
social, political, economic and other events and circumstances in countries outside of the United States, most particularly China and
other non-Western countries.
Our business is heavily impacted by social, political,
economic and other events and circumstances in countries outside of the United States, most particularly in China and other non-Western countries.
These events and circumstances are largely outside of our influence and control. We are heavily dependent on the Chinese manufacture
of equipment. Historically China was a location of significant digital asset mining at low electric power rates. Recently, China and
other foreign governments have taken action to prohibit or significantly restrict digital asset mining. For example, in May and June
2021, in their efforts to curb digital asset trading and mining, regulators in several Chinese Provinces, including Qinghai, Inner Mongolia
and Sichuan, announced policies to curb or ban local digital asset mining operations. Later, the Chinese government extended the ban
on digital asset mining to all Chinese Provinces, effective July 31, 2021. The long-term impact of governmental restrictions on digital
asset mining is unknown and could be either beneficial or detrimental to our business and profitability. Currently, the restrictions
in China have increased the demand for cost-effective data hosting services outside of China. Whether or not the lack of mining activity
in China will negatively impact Chinese miner manufacturing and the development, price, availability of new and enhanced mining equipment
is unknown. Should China or other countries that currently restrict digital asset mining eliminate such restrictions or actually seek
to enhance such mining activity, the likely increase in mining activity could reduce our revenue and profitability.
Adoption of a different method of validating
transactions in bitcoin could materially impair the business of mining firms, and could even make them obsolete.
Transactions in bitcoin are currently validated
by a system called “proof of work,” where powerful computers run software that races to solve complex problems, verifying
transactions in the process. The system is widely known as “mining” because the computers earn payments in cryptocurrency
as rewards for the verification service. The system has been criticized by many because it requires substantial amounts of electricity
to validate transactions. Recently, another type of digital currency, Ethereum, implemented a different system of validation called “proof
of stake,” which is expected to require 99% less energy consumption. In the event bitcoin adopts a similar system, it could make
bitcoin mining substantially less profitable and could even render the business obsolete.
Where there is no assurance that bitcoin will
not adopt a “proof of stake” system. Even if bitcoin decided to adopt such a system, we do not believe that the adoption would
occur during in the near term, given the number of years it took Ethereum to create and implement its alternative system.
Continuing coronavirus outbreaks may
have a material adverse impact on our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.
COVID-19 was first reported in December 2019
in the City of Wuhan, Hubei, China and was recognized as a pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020. In response
to the pandemic, governmental authorities around the World, including the United States, Canada, China and elsewhere, introduced various
measures to limit the spread of the pandemic, including travel restrictions, border closures, business closures, quarantines, self- and
forced isolations, shelter-in-place orders and social distancing. COVID-19 reduced the number of new generation machines
available for purchase by prospective customers of our blockchain hosting services, delayed the delivery and implementation of new generation
mining machines and reduced demand for services. A resurgence of COVID-19, including the emergence of variant strains of COVID-19, could
have a material impact on our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations and any such impact will be determined
by the severity and duration of the continuing pandemic.
Changes in tariffs or import restrictions
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Equipment necessary for digital asset mining is
almost entirely manufactured outside of the United States. There is currently significant uncertainty about the future relationship between
the United States and various other countries, including China, the European Union, Canada, and Mexico, with respect to trade policies,
treaties, tariffs and customs duties, and taxes. For example, since 2019, the U.S. government has implemented significant changes to U.S.
trade policy with respect to China. These tariffs have subjected certain digital asset mining equipment manufactured overseas to additional
import duties of up to 25%. The amount of the additional tariffs and the number of products subject to them has changed numerous times
based on action by the U.S. government. These tariffs have increased costs of digital asset mining equipment, and new or additional tariffs
or other restrictions on the import of equipment necessary for digital asset mining could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
A significant portion of our assets
are pledged to an entity controlled by our chairman and failure to repay obligations to such entity when due will have a material adverse
effect on our business and could result in foreclosure on our assets.
As of November 4, 2022, we owed $400,000 to
an investment fund controlled by our chairman under a line of credit that permits draws by the company of up to $1,000,000. At maturity
on December 1, 2023, the amount due under the line of credit along with accrued interest will be payable in full.
It is necessary for us to grow our business in
order to generate the free cash flow necessary to repay the principal and interest on our indebtedness. If we were to default on the amounts
owed or other terms and conditions of the convertible notes, the lender would have the right to exercise rights and remedies to collect,
which would include obtaining judgement lien on our assets and selling them to pay the judgment. A default would have a material adverse
effect on our business and our stockholders could lose their entire investment in us. We may need to raise capital in order to repay
our amounts due under the line of credit at maturity. There is no assurance that we will be able to raise such capital on terms that will
be favorable to common stockholders.
Delays in the construction of our hosting
facilities or significant cost overruns could present significant risks to our business and could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
The servers used for digital asset transaction
processing and colocation hosting require the use of facilities (“hosting facilities”) with a highly specialized infrastructure
and considerable, reliable power in order to compete effectively. Our growth strategy is to build mining capacity in locations that have
reliable sources of low-cost power, and to utilize that capacity to host third-party miners and to host our own proprietary mining equipment.
We have opened our initial hosting facility in Trinidad, and continue to search for new locations for hosting facilities, but inside and
outside Trinidad. We may face challenges in obtaining suitable land to build new hosting facilities, as we need to work closely with the
local power suppliers and local governments of the places where our proposed hosting facilitates are located. Delays in actions that require
the assistance of such third parties, in receiving required permits and approvals or in mediations with local communities, if any, may
negatively impact our construction timelines and budget or result in any new hosting facilities not being completed at all.
Additional expansion of existing hosting facilities
and construction of new hosting facilities is also being contemplated. Such expansion and construction require us to rely on the experience
of one or more designers, general contractors and subcontractors, and such designers or contractors may experience financial or other
problems during the design or construction process. We may also experience quality control issues as we implement any upgrades in our
hosting capacity through the installation and maintenance of chipsets and servers or new cooling technologies such as immersion and water
curtain cooling. Our business will be negatively impacted if we are unable to run our mining operations in a way that is technologically
advanced, economically and energy efficient and temperature controlled. If we are unsuccessful, we will damage our miners and the miners
of third parties and the profitability of our mining operations.
If we experience significant delays in the supply
of power required to support any hosting facility expansion or new construction, the progress of such projects could deviate from our
original plans, which could cause material and negative effects on our revenue growth, profitability and results of operations. Any material
delay in completing these projects, or any substantial cost increases or quality issues in connection with these projects, could materially
delay our ability to deliver our hosting capacity, cause us to incur penalties under hosting contracts, result in reduced order volume
and materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to risks associated
with our need for significant electric power and the limited availability of power resources, which could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our mining and hosting services require a significant
amount of electric power. The costs of electric power account for a significant portion of our cost of revenue. We require a significant
electric power supply to conduct our mining activity and to provide many hosting services we offer, such as powering and cooling our and
our customers’ servers and network equipment and operating critical mining and hosting facility and equipment infrastructure.
The amount of power required by us and our customers
will increase commensurate with the demand for our services and the increase in miners we operate for ourselves and our hosting customers.
While energy costs are not vulnerable to seasonal factors in Trinidad, in some places that we are evaluating for future hosting facilities
energy costs and availability are vulnerable to seasonality, with increased costs primarily in the summer months (in the Northern hemisphere)
and risks of outages and power grid damage as a result of inclement weather, animal incursion, sabotage and other events out of our control.
Although we aim to build and operate energy efficient hosting facilities, there can be no assurance such facilities will be able to deliver
sufficient power to meet the growing needs of our business. The cost of power at some of our hosting facilities may be dependent on our
ability to perform under power contracts that we are a party to, which we may be unable to do successfully. Pursuant to these power contracts,
if we fail to curtail our power usage when called upon or fail to satisfy certain eligibility requirements for monthly bill credits, our
power costs would increase. Any system downtime resulting from insufficient power resources or power outages could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our operations may not be equipped to run on back-up generators
in the event of a power outage. Increased power costs and limited availability and curtailment of power resources could reduce our revenue
and have a material and adverse effect on our cost of revenue and results of operations.
Any system downtime resulting from insufficient
power resources or power outages could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Because the mining portion of our business consumes a large amount of energy, it is not practical or economical for our operations to
run on back-up generators in the event of a power outage.
Governments and government regulators
may potentially restrict the ability of electricity suppliers to provide electricity to hosting and transaction processing operations
such as ours, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Governments or government regulators may potentially
restrict electricity suppliers from providing electricity to hosting facilities and hosting and transaction processing operators in times
of electricity shortage or may otherwise potentially restrict or prohibit the provision of electricity to transaction process operators
like us. Some governments, such as China, have moved to ban all digital asset mining due to the adverse impact such mining has on the
environment and/or to conserve the electricity for use by other businesses and consumers in the market. In the event government regulators
issue moratoriums or impose bans or restrictions involving hosting operations or transaction processing in jurisdictions in which we operate,
we will not be able to continue our operations in such jurisdictions. A moratorium, ban or restriction could have a material adverse effect
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Power outage in our hosting facilities
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Although we control, operate and have access to
our servers and all of the other components of our network, we are still vulnerable to disruptions and power outages resulting from weather,
animal incursions, accidents, equipment failures, curtailments, acts of war, sabotage and other events. We may not have backup power generators
for our blockchain operations in the event of a power outage. This could impact our ability to generate and maintain contractually specified
power levels to our contractual counterparties, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
If we do not accurately predict our
hosting facility requirements, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The costs of building out, leasing and maintaining
our hosting facilities constitute a significant portion of our capital and operating expenses. In order to manage growth and ensure adequate
capacity for our digital mining operations and new and existing hosting customers while minimizing unnecessary excess capacity costs,
we continuously evaluate our short- and long-term data center capacity requirements. If we overestimate our business’ capacity requirements
or the demand for our services and therefore secure excess data center capacity, our operating margins could be materially reduced. If
we underestimate our data center capacity requirements, we may not be able to service the expanding needs of our existing customers and
may be required to limit new customer acquisition, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
If there are significant changes to
the method of validating blockchain transactions, such changes could reduce demand for our blockchain hosting services.
New digital asset transaction protocols are continuously
being deployed, and existing and new protocols are in a state of constant change and development. While certain validation protocols currently
employ a “proof of work” consensus algorithm, whereby transaction processors are required to expend significant amounts of
electrical and computing power to solve complex mathematical problems in order to validate transactions and create new blocks in a blockchain,
there may be a shift towards adopting alternative validating protocols. These protocols may include a “proof of stake” algorithm
or an algorithm based on a protocol other than proof of work, which may decrease the reliance on computing power as an advantage to validating
blocks. Our transaction processing operations, and, to our knowledge, the operations of our potential hosting customers, are currently
designed to primarily support a proof of work consensus algorithm. Should the algorithm shift from a proof of work validation method to
a proof of stake method, mining would require less energy and may render any company that maintains advantages in the current climate
(for example, from lower priced electricity, processing, real estate or hosting) less competitive. As a result of our efforts to optimize
and improve the efficiency of our digital asset mining operations, we may be exposed to the risk in the future of losing the benefit of
our capital investments and the competitive advantage we hope to gain from this as a result, and may be negatively impacted if a switch
to proof of stake validation were to occur. Any such change to transaction validating protocols could have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we fail to accurately estimate the
factors upon which we base our contract pricing, we may generate less profit than expected or incur losses on those contracts, which could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our ability to earn a profit on our hosting contracts
requires that we accurately estimate the costs involved and outcomes likely to be achieved and assess the probability of generating sufficient
hosting and colocation capacity within the contracted time period. These expenses include electricity, facilities costs, equipment
costs, supplies, and personnel. In addition, we may not be able to obtain all expected benefits, including tax abatements or government
incentives offered in opportunity zones.
Also, we generally do not charge a fixed sum for
hosting, but charge a percentage of the Bitcoin mined by the customer. To the extent the price of Bitcoin falls, our fee for hosting services
will fall proportionally, and may fall below the cost to provide the hosting services. The inability to accurately estimate the factors
upon which we base our contract pricing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Supply chain and shipping disruptions
have resulted in shipping delays, a significant increase in shipping costs, and could increase product costs and result in lost sales,
which may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
Supply chain disruptions, resulting from factors
such as the COVID-19 pandemic, labor supply and shipping container shortages, have impacted, and may continue to impact, us and our third-party
manufacturers and suppliers. These disruptions have resulted in longer lead times and increased product costs and shipping expenses, including
with respect to the delivery of miners that we have purchased. While we have taken steps to minimize the impact of these increased costs
by working closely with our suppliers and customers, there can be no assurances that unforeseen events impacting the supply chain will
not have a material adverse effect on us in the future. Additionally, the impacts supply chain disruptions have on our third-party manufacturers
and suppliers are not within our control. It is not currently possible to predict how long it will take for these supply chain disruptions
to cease. Prolonged supply chain disruptions impacting us and our third-party manufacturers and suppliers could interrupt product manufacturing,
increased lead times, increased product costs and result in lost sales and bitcoin production, result in a delay in the delivery of miners
that we have purchased, and continue to increase shipping costs associated with the delivery of our purchased miners, which may have a
material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
Banking relationships can be difficult
to maintain for companies in the crypto currency space.
A number of companies that engage in Bitcoin and/or
other cryptocurrency-related activities have been unable to find banks or financial institutions that are willing to provide them with
bank accounts and other services. Similarly, a number of companies and individuals or businesses associated with cryptocurrencies may
have had and may continue to have their existing bank accounts closed or services discontinued with financial institutions. To the extent
that such events may happen to us, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially
the value of any bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account.
Any failure in the critical systems
of our hosting facilities or services we provide could lead to disruptions in our and our customers’ businesses and could harm our
reputation and result in financial penalty and legal liabilities, which would reduce our revenue and have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The critical systems of the hosting facilities
we operate and the services we provide are subject to failure. Any failure in the critical systems of any hosting facility we operate
or services that we provide, including a breakdown in critical plant, equipment or services, routers, switches or other equipment, power
supplies or network connectivity, whether or not within our control, could result in service interruptions impacting our customers as
well as equipment damage, which could significantly disrupt the normal business operations of our customers, harm our reputation and reduce
our revenue. Any failure or downtime in one of the facilities that we operate impact mining rewards generated by us and reduce the profitability
of our customers. The total destruction or severe impairment of any of the facilities we operate could result in significant
downtime of our services and loss of customer data. Since our ability to attract and retain customers depends on our ability to provide
highly reliable service, even minor interruptions in our service could harm our reputation and negatively impact our revenue and profitability.
The services we provide are subject to failures resulting from numerous factors, including:
|
• |
|
human error or accidents; |
|
• |
|
theft, sabotage and vandalism; |
|
• |
|
failure by us or our suppliers to provide adequate service or maintain our equipment; |
|
• |
|
network connectivity downtime and fiber cuts; |
|
• |
|
service interruptions resulting from server relocation; |
|
• |
|
security breaches of our infrastructure; |
|
• |
|
improper building maintenance by us; |
|
• |
|
physical, electronic and cybersecurity breaches; |
|
• |
|
fire, earthquake, hurricane, tornado, flood and other natural disasters; |
|
• |
|
public health emergencies; and |
Moreover, service interruptions and equipment failures
may expose us to potential legal liability. As our services are critical to our customers’ business operations, any disruption in
our services could result in lost profits of or other indirect or consequential damages to our customers. Although our customer contracts
typically contain provisions limiting our liability for service outages causes by factors beyond our control, there can be no assurance
that a court would enforce any contractual limitations on our liability in the event that one of our customers brings a lawsuit against
us as the result of a service interruption that they may ascribe to us. The outcome of any such lawsuit would depend on the specific facts
of the case and any legal and policy considerations that we may not be able to mitigate. In such cases, we could be liable for substantial
damage awards, which would as a result have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our success is dependent on the ability
of our management team and our ability to attract, develop, motivate and retain other well-qualified employees, which may be more difficult,
costly or time-consuming than expected.
Our success depends largely on the development
and execution of our business strategy by our senior management team. We cannot assure you that our management will work well together,
work well with our other existing employees or successfully execute our business strategy in the near-term or at all, which could have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our future success also depends on our continuing
ability to attract, develop, motivate and retain highly qualified and skilled directors and other employees. In particular, it is difficult
to locate experienced executives in our industry and offer them competitive salaries at this stage in our development. We may be unable
to retain our directors, senior executives and key personnel or attract and retain new directors, senior executives and key personnel
in the future, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. At this
time, we are not paying any salaries to certain members of our management team, and are not paying market salaries to the remainder. There
is no assurance that we will be able to retain any member of management while we are unable to competitive compensation and benefits to
management.
Competition for employees is intense,
and we may not be able to attract and retain the qualified and skilled employees needed to support our business, which in turn could have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operation.
We believe our success depends on the efforts and
talent of our employees, including hosting facility design, construction management, operations, data processing, engineering, IT, risk
management and sales and marketing personnel. Our future success depends on our continued ability to attract, develop, motivate and retain
qualified and skilled employees. Competition for highly skilled personnel is extremely intense. We may not be able to hire and retain
these personnel at compensation levels consistent with our existing compensation and salary structure. Some of the companies with which
we compete for experienced employees have greater resources than we have and may be able to offer more attractive terms of employment.
In addition, we invest significant time and expenses
in training our employees, which increases their value to competitors who may seek to recruit them. If we fail to retain our employees,
we could incur significant expenses in hiring and training their replacements, and the quality of our services and our ability to serve
our customers could diminish, resulting in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. At
this time, we lack the resources to hire all of the skilled employees that we need to properly operate our business.
We may be vulnerable to security breaches,
which could disrupt our operations and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
A party who is able to compromise the physical
security measures protecting our hosting facilities could cause interruptions or malfunctions in our operations and misappropriate our
property or the property of our customers. As we provide assurances to our customers that we provide the highest level of security, such
a compromise could be particularly harmful to our brand and reputation. We may be required to expend significant capital and resources
to protect against such threats or to alleviate problems caused by breaches in security. As techniques used to breach security change
frequently and are often not recognized until launched against a target, we may not be able to implement new security measures in a timely
manner or, if and when implemented, we may not be certain whether these measures could be circumvented. Any breaches that may occur could
expose us to increased risk of lawsuits, regulatory penalties, loss of existing or potential customers, harm to our reputation and increases
in our security costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, any assertions of alleged security
breaches or systems failure made against us, whether true or not, could harm our reputation, cause us to incur substantial legal fees
and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Whether or not any such assertion actually
develops into litigation, our management may be required to devote significant time and attention to dispute resolution (through litigation,
settlement or otherwise), which would detract from our management’s ability to focus on our business. Any such resolution could
involve the payment of damages or expenses by us, which may be significant. In addition, any such resolution could involve our agreement
with terms that restrict the operation of our business. Any such resolution, including the resources exhausted in connection therewith,
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Furthermore, security breaches, computer malware
and computer hacking attacks have been a prevalent concern in the Bitcoin exchange market since the launch of the Bitcoin network. Any
security breach caused by hacking, which involves efforts to gain unauthorized access to information or systems, or to cause intentional
malfunctions or loss or corruption of data, software, hardware or other computer equipment, and the inadvertent transmission of computer
viruses, could harm our business operations or result in loss of our assets.
We are subject to litigation risks.
We may be subject to litigation arising out of
our operations. Damages claimed under such litigation may be material, and the outcome of such litigation may materially impact our operations,
and the value of the common shares. While we will assess the merits of any lawsuits and defend such lawsuits accordingly, we may be required
to incur significant expense or devote significant financial resources to such defenses. In addition, the adverse publicity surrounding
such claims may have a material adverse effect on our operations.
We may be exposed to cybersecurity
threats and hacks, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The threats to network and data security are increasingly
diverse and sophisticated. Despite our efforts and processes to prevent breaches, our computer servers and computer systems may be vulnerable
to cybersecurity risks, including denial-of-service attacks, physical or electronic break-ins, employee theft or misuse
and similar disruptions from unauthorized tampering with our computer servers and computer systems. The preventive actions we take to
reduce the risk of cyber incidents and protect our information technology and networks may be insufficient to repel a major cyber-attack
in the future. To the extent that any disruption or security breach results in a loss or damage to our network, in unauthorized disclosure
of confidential information or in a loss of our digital assets, it could cause significant damage to our reputation, lead to claims against
us and ultimately have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, we may
be required to incur significant costs to protect against damage caused by these disruptions or security breaches in the future.
Our future success depends on our ability
to keep pace with rapid technological changes that could make our current or future technologies less competitive or obsolete.
Rapid, significant and disruptive technological
changes continue to impact our industry. The infrastructure at our hosting facilities may become less marketable due to demand for new
processes and technologies, including, without limitation: (i) new processes to deliver power to, or eliminate heat from, computer
systems; (ii) customer demand for additional redundancy capacity; (iii) new technology that permits higher levels of critical
load and heat removal than our hosting facilities are currently designed to provide; (iv) an inability of the power supply to support
new, updated or upgraded technology; and (v) a shift to more power-efficient transaction validation protocols. In addition, the systems
that connect our hosting facilities to the Internet and other external networks may become insufficient, including with respect to latency,
reliability and diversity of connectivity. We may not be able to adapt to changing technologies, identify and implement new alternatives
successfully or meet customer demands for new processes or technologies in a timely and cost-effective manner, if at all, which would
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Even if we succeed in adapting to new processes
and technologies, there is no assurance that our use of such new processes or technology would have a positive impact on our financial
performance. For example, we could incur substantial additional costs if we needed to materially improve our hosting center infrastructure
through the implementation of new systems or new server technologies that require levels of critical load and heat removal that our facilities
are not currently designed to provide. In addition, if one of our new offerings were competitive to our prior offerings and represented
an adequate or superior alternative, customers could decide to abandon prior offerings that produce higher revenue or better margins for
the new offering. Therefore, the adaptation to new processes and technologies could result in lower revenue, lower margins and/or higher
costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, our competitors or others might develop
technologies that are more effective than our current or future technologies, or that render our technologies less competitive or obsolete.
Further, many of our competitors may have superior financial and human resources deployed toward research and development efforts. We
may not be able to effectively keep pace with relevant technological changes. If competitors introduce superior technologies for hosting
operations or transaction processing, and we cannot make upgrades to our hardware or software to remain competitive, it could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our compliance and risk management
methods might not be effective and may result in outcomes that could adversely affect our reputation, operating results, and financial
condition.
Our ability to comply with applicable complex and
evolving laws, regulations, and rules is largely dependent on the establishment and maintenance of our compliance, audit, and reporting
systems, as well as our ability to attract and retain qualified compliance and other risk management personnel. While we plan to devote
significant resources to develop policies and procedures to identify, monitor and manage our risks, we cannot assure you that our policies
and procedures will always be effective against all types of risks, including unidentified or unanticipated risks, or that we will always
be successful in monitoring or evaluating the risks to which we are or may be exposed in all market environments.
We may infringe on third-party intellectual
property rights or other proprietary rights, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Our commercial success depends on our ability to
operate without infringing third-party intellectual property rights or other proprietary rights. For example, there may be issued patents
of which we are not aware that our services or products infringe on. Also, there may be patents we believe we do not infringe on, but
that we may ultimately be found to by a court of law or government regulatory agency. Moreover, patent applications are in some cases
maintained in secrecy until patents are issued. Because patents can take many years to issue, there may be currently pending applications
of which we are unaware that may later result in issued patents that our services or products allegedly infringe on.
If a third party brings any claim against us based
on third-party intellectual property rights and/or other proprietary rights, we will be required to spend significant resources to defend
and challenge such claim, as well as to invalidate any such rights. Any such claim, if initiated against us, whether or not it is resolved
in our favor, could result in significant expense to us, and divert the efforts of our technical and management personnel, which could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The further development and acceptance
of cryptographic and algorithmic protocols governing transaction validation and the issuance of, and transactions in, digital assets are
subject to a variety of factors that are difficult to evaluate. The slowing or stoppage of development or acceptance of blockchain networks
and digital assets would have an adverse material effect on the successful development of the mining operation and value of mined digital
assets.
The use of digital assets to, among other things,
buy and sell goods and services, is part of a new and rapidly evolving industry that employs digital assets based upon a computer-generated
mathematical and/or cryptographic protocol. The future of this industry is subject to a high degree of uncertainty. The factors affecting
the further development of this industry include, but are not limited to:
|
• |
|
continued worldwide growth in the adoption and use of digital assets and blockchain technologies; |
|
• |
|
government and quasi-government regulation of digital assets and their use, or restrictions on or regulation of access to and operations of digital asset transaction processing; |
|
• |
|
changes in consumer demographics and public tastes and preferences; |
|
• |
|
the maintenance and development of the open-source software protocols or similar digital asset systems; |
|
• |
|
the availability and popularity of other forms or methods of buying and selling goods and services, or trading assets including new means of using fiat currencies; |
|
• |
|
general economic conditions and the regulatory environment relating to digital assets; and |
|
• |
|
negative consumer perception of digital assets, including digital assets specifically and digital assets generally. |
|
• |
|
a decline in the popularity or acceptance of digital assets could materially impact us or our potential hosting customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. |
We may not be able to adequately protect
our intellectual property rights and other proprietary rights, which could have a material adverse effect on business, financial condition
and results of operations.
We may not be able to obtain broad protection in
the United States or internationally for all of our existing and future intellectual property and other proprietary rights, and we may
not be able to obtain effective protection for our intellectual property and other proprietary rights in every country in which we operate.
Protecting our intellectual property rights and other proprietary rights may require significant expenditure of our financial, managerial
and operational resources. Moreover, the steps that we may take to protect our intellectual property and other proprietary rights may
not be adequate to protect such rights or prevent third parties from infringing or misappropriating such rights. Any of our intellectual
property rights and other proprietary rights, whether registered, unregistered, issued or unissued, may be challenged by others or invalidated
through administrative proceedings and/or litigation.
We may be required to spend significant resources
to secure, maintain, monitor and protect our intellectual property rights and other proprietary rights. Despite our efforts, we may not
be able to prevent third parties from infringing upon, misappropriating or otherwise violating our intellectual property rights and other
proprietary rights. We may initiate claims, administrative proceedings and/or litigation against others for infringement, misappropriation
or violation of our intellectual property rights or other proprietary rights to enforce and/or maintain the validity of such rights. Any
such action, if initiated, whether or not it is resolved in our favor, could result in significant expense to us, and divert the efforts
of our technical and management personnel, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Risks Related to Our Limited Operating History
and Early Stage of Growth
We operate in a rapidly developing
industry and have an evolving business model with no history of generating revenue from our services. In addition, our evolving business
model increases the complexity of our business, which makes it difficult to evaluate our future business prospects and could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may adjust our business model further from
time to time, including trying to offer additional types of products or services, such as a blockchain application designed by us, blockchain
services and other related businesses, or entering into strategic partnerships or acquisitions. The evolution of and modifications to
our business strategy will continue to increase the complexity of our business and placed significant strain on our management, personnel,
operations, systems, technical performance and financial resources. Future additions to or modifications of our business strategy are
likely to have similar effects. Further, any new services that we offer that are not favorably received by the market could damage our
reputation or our brand. There can be no assurance that we will ever generate sufficient revenues or achieve profitably in the future
or that we will have adequate working capital to meet our obligations as they become due.
We cannot be certain that our current business
strategy or any new or revised business strategies will be successful or that we will successfully address the risks we face. In the event
that we do not effectively evaluate future business prospects, successfully implement new strategies or adapt to our evolving industry,
it will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may not be able to compete effectively
against our current and future competitors, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
The digital asset mining industry is highly innovative,
rapidly evolving and characterized by healthy competition, experimentation, frequent introductions of new products and services and uncertain
and evolving industry and regulatory requirements. We expect competition to further intensify in the future as existing and new competitors
introduce new products or enhance existing products. We compete against a number of companies operating both within the United States
and abroad, that have greater financial and other resources and that focus on digital asset mining, including businesses focused on developing
substantial Bitcoin mining operations. If we are unable to compete successfully, or if competing successfully requires us to take costly
actions in response to the actions of our competitors, our business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected.
We compete with a range of hosting providers and
blockchain providers for some or all of the services we offer. We face competition from numerous developers, owners and operators in the
blockchain industry, including technology companies, such as hyperscale cloud players, managed service providers and real estate investment
trusts (“REITs”), some of which own or lease properties similar to ours, or may do so in the future, in the same submarkets
in which our properties are located. Cloud offerings may also influence our customers to move workloads to cloud providers, which may
reduce the services they obtain from us. Our current and future competitors may vary from us in size, service offerings and geographic
presence.
Competition is primarily centered on reputation
and track record; design, size, quality, available power and geographic coverage of hosting space; quality of installation and customer
equipment repair services; relationships with equipment manufacturers and ability to obtain replacement parts; technical and software
expertise; and financial strength and price. Some of our current and future competitors may have greater brand recognition, longer operating
histories, stronger marketing, technical and financial resources and access to greater and less expensive power than we do.
In addition, many companies in the industry are
consolidating, which could further increase the market power of our competitors. As a result, some of our competitors may be able to:
|
• |
|
identify and acquire desirable properties that we are interested in from developers; |
|
• |
|
offer hosting services at prices below current market rates or below the prices we currently charge our customers; |
|
• |
|
bundle colocation services with other services or equipment they provide at reduced prices; |
|
• |
|
develop superior products or services, gain greater market acceptance and expand their service offerings more efficiently or rapidly; |
|
• |
|
adapt to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements more quickly; |
|
• |
|
take advantage of acquisition and other opportunities more readily; and |
|
• |
|
adopt more aggressive pricing policies and devote greater resources to the promotion, marketing and sales of their services. |
We operate in a competitive market, and we face
pricing pressure with respect to our hosting services. Prices for our hosting services are affected by a variety of factors, including
supply and demand conditions and pricing pressures from our competitors. We may be required to lower our prices to remain competitive,
which may decrease our margins and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, we also face significant competition
from other users and/or companies that are processing transactions on one or more digital asset networks, as well as other potential financial
vehicles, including securities, derivatives or futures backed by, or linked to, digital assets through entities similar to us, such as
exchange-traded funds. Market and financial conditions, and other conditions beyond our control, may make it more attractive to invest
in other financial vehicles, or to invest in digital assets directly. Such events could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations and potentially the value of any digital assets we hold or expect to acquire for our own
account.
Our projections are subject to significant
risks, assumptions, estimates and uncertainties, including assumptions regarding the demand for our hosting services and the adoption
of Bitcoin and other digital assets. As a result, our projected revenues, market share, expenses and profitability may differ materially
from our expectations in any given quarter or fiscal year.
We operate in a rapidly changing and competitive
industry and our projections are subject to the risks and assumptions made by management with respect to our industry. Operating results
are difficult to forecast as they generally depend on our assessment of the timing of adoption and use of Bitcoin and other digital assets,
which is uncertain. Furthermore, as we invest in the development of our hosting and self-mining business, whether because of competition
or otherwise, we may not recover the substantial up-front costs of constructing, developing and maintaining our hosting facilities
and purchasing the latest generation of miners or recover the opportunity cost of diverting management and financial resources away from
other opportunities. Additionally, our business may be affected by reductions in miner demand for hosting facilities and services and
the price of Bitcoin and other digital assets as a result of a number of factors which may be difficult to predict. Similarly, our assumptions
and expectations with respect to margins and the pricing of our hosting services and market price of Bitcoin or other digital assets we
mine may not prove to be accurate. This may result in decreased revenue, and we may be unable to adopt measures in a timely manner to
compensate for any unexpected shortfall in revenue. This inability could cause our operating results in a given quarter or year to be
higher or lower than expected. If actual results differ from our estimates, analysts or investors may negatively react and our stock price
could be materially impacted.
We may experience difficulties in establishing
relationships with banks, leasing companies, insurance companies and other financial institutions that are willing to provide us with
customary financial products and services, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
As an early stage company with operations focused
in the digital asset transaction processing industry, we may in the future experience difficulties in establishing relationships with
banks, leasing companies, insurance companies and other financial institutions that are willing to provide us with customary leasing and
financial products and services, such as bank accounts, lines of credit, insurance and other related services, which are necessary for
our operations. To the extent a significant portion of our business consists of digital asset transaction mining, processing or hosting,
we may in the future continue to experience difficulty obtaining additional financial products and services on customary terms, which
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to Regulatory Framework
If we were deemed an “investment
company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), applicable restrictions could make it
impractical for us to continue our business as contemplated and could have a material adverse effect on our business.
An issuer will generally be deemed to be an “investment
company” for purposes of the 1940 Act if:
|
• |
|
it is an “orthodox” investment company because it is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities; or |
|
• |
|
it is an inadvertent investment company because, absent an applicable exemption, it owns or proposes to acquire “investment securities” having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. |
We believe that we are not and will not be primarily
engaged in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities, and we do not hold ourselves out as being engaged in those
activities. We intend to hold ourselves out as a digital asset mining business. Accordingly, we do not believe that we are an “orthodox”
investment company as described in the first bullet point above.
While certain digital assets may be deemed to be
securities, we do not believe that certain other digital assets, in particular Bitcoin, are securities; therefore, we believe that less
than 40% of our total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis will comprise digital
assets that could be considered investment securities. Accordingly, we do not believe that we are an inadvertent investment company by
virtue of the 40% inadvertent investment company test as described in the second bullet point above. Although we do not believe any of
the digital assets we may own, acquire or mine are securities, there is still some regulatory uncertainty on the subject, see “Risk
Factors — There is no one unifying principle governing the regulatory status of digital assets nor whether digital assets are
securities in any particular context. Regulatory changes or actions in one or more countries may alter the nature of an investment in
us or restrict the use of digital assets in a manner that adversely affects our business, prospects or operations.” If certain digital
assets, including Bitcoin, were to be deemed securities, and consequently, investment securities by the SEC, we could be deemed an inadvertent
investment company.
If we were to be deemed an inadvertent investment
company, we may seek to rely on Rule 3a-2 under the 1940 Act, which allows an inadvertent investment company a grace period
of one year from the earlier of (a) the date on which the issuer owns securities and/or cash having a value exceeding 50% of the
issuer’s total assets on either a consolidated or unconsolidated basis or (b) the date on which the issuer owns or proposes
to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of such issuer’s total assets (exclusive of U.S. government
securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. We are putting in place policies that we expect will work to keep the investment
securities held by us at less than 40% of our total assets, which may include acquiring assets with our cash, liquidating our investment
securities or seeking no-action relief or exemptive relief from the SEC if we are unable to acquire sufficient assets or liquidate
sufficient investment securities in a timely manner. As Rule 3a-2 is available to an issuer no more than once every three years,
and assuming no other exclusion were available to us, we would have to keep within the 40% limit for at least three years after we cease
being an inadvertent investment company. This may limit our ability to make certain investments or enter into joint ventures that could
otherwise have a positive impact on our earnings. In any event, we do not intend to become an investment company engaged in the business
of investing and trading securities.
Finally, we believe we are not an investment
company under Section 3(b)(1) of the 1940 Act because we are primarily engaged in a non-investment company business.
The 1940 Act and the rules thereunder contain detailed
parameters for the organization and operations of investment companies. Among other things, the 1940 Act and the rules thereunder limit
or prohibit transactions with affiliates, impose limitations on the issuance of debt and equity securities, prohibit the issuance of stock
options, and impose certain governance requirements. We intend to continue to conduct our operations so that we will not be deemed to
be an investment company under the 1940 Act. However, if anything were to happen that would cause us to be deemed to be an investment
company under the 1940 Act, requirements imposed by the 1940 Act, including limitations on our capital structure, ability to transact
business with affiliates and ability to compensate key employees, could make it impractical for us to continue our business as currently
conducted, impair the agreements and arrangements between and among us and our senior management team and materially and adversely affect
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Any change in the interpretive positions
of the SEC or its staff with respect to digital asset mining firms could have a material adverse effect on us.
We intend to conduct our operations so that we
are not required to register as an investment company under the 1940 Act. Specifically, we do not believe that digital assets, are securities.
The SEC Staff has not provided guidance with respect to the treatment of these assets under the 1940 Act. To the extent the SEC Staff
publishes new guidance with respect to these matters, we may be required to adjust our strategy or assets accordingly. There can be no
assurance that we will be able to maintain our exclusion from registration as an investment company under the 1940 Act. In addition, as
a consequence of our seeking to avoid the need to register under the 1940 Act on an ongoing basis, we may be limited in our ability to
engage in digital asset mining operations or otherwise make certain investments, and these limitations could result in our holding assets
we may wish to sell or selling assets we may wish to hold, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
If regulatory changes or interpretations
of our activities require our registration as a money services business (“MSB”) under the regulations promulgated by the Financial
Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) under the authority of the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act, or otherwise under state laws, we
may incur significant compliance costs, which could be substantial or cost-prohibitive. If we become subject to these regulations, our
costs in complying with them may have a material negative effect on our business and the results of our operations.
To the extent that our activities cause us to be
deemed an MSB under the regulations promulgated by FinCEN under the authority of the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act, we may be required to comply
with FinCEN regulations, including those that would mandate us to implement anti-money laundering programs, make certain reports to FinCEN
and maintain certain records.
To the extent that our activities would cause us
to be deemed a “money transmitter” (“MT”) or equivalent designation, under state law in any state in which we
may operate, we may be required to seek a license or otherwise register with a state regulator and comply with state regulations that
may include the implementation of anti-money laundering programs, maintenance of certain records and other operational requirements. For
example, in August 2015, the New York State Department of Financial Services enacted the first U.S. regulatory framework for licensing
participants in “virtual currency business activity.” The regulations, known as the “BitLicense,” are intended
to focus on consumer protection and regulate the conduct of businesses that are involved in “virtual currencies” in New York
or with New York customers and prohibit any person or entity involved in such activity to conduct activities without a license.
Such additional federal or state regulatory obligations
may cause us to incur extraordinary expenses. Furthermore, we may not be capable of complying with certain federal or state regulatory
obligations applicable to MSBs and MTs. If we are deemed to be subject to and determine not to comply with such additional regulatory
and registration requirements, we may act to dissolve and liquidate.
There is no one unifying principle
governing the regulatory status of digital assets nor whether digital assets are securities in any particular context. Regulatory changes
or actions in one or more countries may alter the nature of an investment in us or restrict the use of digital assets in a manner that
adversely affects our business, prospects or operations.
As digital assets have grown in both popularity
and market size, governments around the world have reacted differently, with certain governments deeming digital assets illegal, and others
allowing their use and trade without restriction. In some jurisdictions, such as in the U.S., digital assets are subject to extensive,
and in some cases overlapping, unclear and evolving regulatory requirements.
Bitcoin is the oldest and most well-known form
of digital asset. Bitcoin and other forms of digital assets have been the source of much regulatory consternation, resulting in differing
definitional outcomes without a single unifying statement. Bitcoin and other digital assets are viewed differently by different regulatory
and standards setting organizations globally as well as in the United States on the federal and state levels. For example, the Financial
Action Task Force considers a digital asset as currency or an asset, and the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) considers a
digital asset as property and not currency. Further, the IRS applies general tax principles that apply to property transactions to transactions
involving virtual currency.
If regulatory changes or interpretations require
the regulation of Bitcoin or other digital assets under the securities laws of the United States or elsewhere, including the Securities
Act, the Exchange Act and the 1940 Act or similar laws of other jurisdictions and interpretations by the SEC, the CFTC, the IRS, Department
of Treasury or other agencies or authorities, we may be required to register and comply with such regulations, including at a state or
local level. To the extent that we decide to continue operations, the required registrations and regulatory compliance steps may result
in extraordinary expense or burdens to us. We may also decide to cease certain operations and change our business model. Any disruption
of our operations in response to the changed regulatory circumstances may be at a time that is disadvantageous to us.
Current and future legislation and SEC-rulemaking and
other regulatory developments, including interpretations released by a regulatory authority, may impact the manner in which Bitcoin or
other digital assets are viewed or treated for classification and clearing purposes. In particular, Bitcoin and other digital assets may
not be excluded from the definition of “security” by SEC rulemaking or interpretation requiring registration of all transactions
unless another exemption is available, including transacting in Bitcoin or digital assets among owners and require registration of trading
platforms as “exchanges.”
Furthermore, the SEC may determine that certain
digital assets or interests may constitute securities under the “Howey” test as stated by the United States Supreme Court.
We do not believe our planned mining activities would require registration for us to conduct such activities and accumulate digital assets.
However, the SEC, CFTC, IRS, stock exchanges, or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency or organization may conclude that our
activities involve the offer or sale of “securities,” or ownership of “investment securities,” and we may be
subject to regulation or registration requirements under various federal laws and related rules. Such regulation or the inability to
meet the requirements to continue operations, would have a material adverse effect on our business and operations. We may also face similar
issues with various state securities regulators who may interpret our actions as subjecting us to regulation, or requiring registration,
under state securities laws, banking laws, or money transmitter and similar laws, which are also an unsettled area or regulation that
exposes us to risks. In light of such certainty, any determination that we make regarding the applicability of any law or regulation
to our activities would be a risk-based assessment, and would not be binding on any regulatory body or court, and would not preclude
legal or regulatory action against us.
Regulatory changes or actions may restrict
the use of digital assets or the operation of digital asset networks in a manner that may require us to cease certain or all operations,
which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Recently, there has been a significant amount of
regulatory attention directed toward digital assets, digital asset networks and other industry participants by United States federal and
state governments, foreign governments and self-regulatory agencies. For example, as digital assets such as Bitcoin have grown in popularity
and in market size, the Federal Reserve Board, U.S. Congress and certain U.S. agencies (e.g., FinCEN, the SEC, the CFTC and the Federal
Bureau of Investigation) have begun to examine the operations of the Bitcoin network, Bitcoin users and Bitcoin exchange markets.
In addition, local state regulators such as the
Texas State Securities Board, the Massachusetts Securities Division of the Office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth, the New Jersey
Bureau of Securities, the North Carolina Secretary of State’s Securities Division and the Vermont Department of Financial Regulation
have initiated actions against, and investigations of, individuals and companies involved in digital assets.
Also, in March 2018, the South Carolina Attorney
General Office’s Security Division issued a cease-and-desist order against Genesis Mining and Swiss Gold Global, Inc., stating that
both companies were to stop doing business in South Carolina and are permanently barred from offering securities in the state in the future
since they offered unregistered securities via cloud mining contracts under the South Carolina Uniformed Securities Act of 2005, S.C.
Code Ann. § 35-1-101, et seq. (the order against Genesis Mining was subsequently withdrawn).
Further, the North Carolina Secretary of State’s
Securities Division issued in March 2018 a Temporary Cease and Desist Order against Power Mining Pool (made permanent pursuant to a Final
Order on April 19, 2018), ordering it to cease and desist, among other things, offering “mining pool shares,” which were
deemed “securities” under N.C. Gen. Stat. 78A-2(11), in North Carolina until they are registered with the North
Carolina Secretary of State or are offered for sale pursuant to an exemption from registration under the North Carolina Securities Act,
N.C. Gen. Stat. Chapter 78A.
Additionally, we rely on third-party mining pool
service providers for mining revenue payouts from our mining operation, and certain of our potential hosting customers could be involved
in, or could issue, cloud mining contracts or mining pool shares, and any regulatory restrictions on their practices could significantly
reduce demand for our hosting services. Furthermore, it is possible that laws, regulations or directives that affect digital assets, digital
asset transaction processing or blockchain server hosting may change in a manner that may adversely affect our ability to conduct our
business and operations in the relevant jurisdiction.
In addition, various foreign jurisdictions either
have adopted or may adopt laws, regulations or directives that affect digital assets, digital asset networks and their users and hosting
service providers that fall within such jurisdictions’ regulatory scope. Such laws, regulations or directives may conflict with
those of the United States, may negatively impact the acceptance of digital assets by users, merchants and service providers outside of
the United States and may therefore impede the growth of digital asset use. A number of countries, including India, China, South Korea
and Russia, among others, currently have a more restrictive stance toward digital assets and, thereby, have reduced the rate of expansion
of digital asset use, as well as digital asset transaction processing, in each of those countries. For example, in January 2018, several
media publications reported that a Chinese multiagency government task force overseeing risk in Internet finance issued a notice ordering
local authorities to guide the shutdown of digital asset transaction processing in China. However, the People’s Bank of China immediately
refuted such reports, indicating that digital asset transaction processing is still permitted in China. As a result of such conflicting
positions taken within the Chinese government, a number of digital asset transaction processing operators have moved their operations
from China to other jurisdictions in order to build in more regulatory certainty in their operations.
Governments may in the future take regulatory actions
that prohibit or severely restrict the right to acquire, own, hold, sell, use or trade digital assets or to exchange digital assets for
fiat currency. Ownership of, holding or trading in digital assets may then be considered illegal and subject to sanction. Governments
may also take regulatory action that may increase the cost and/or subject digital asset mining companies to additional regulation.
By extension, similar actions by governments may
result in the restriction of the acquisition, ownership, holding, selling, use or trading in the capital stock of digital asset mining
companies, including our common stock. Such a restriction could result in us liquidating our digital asset inventory at unfavorable prices
and may adversely affect our shareholders. The effect of any regulatory change, either by federal, state, local or foreign governments
or any self-regulatory agencies, on us or our potential hosting customers is impossible to predict, but such change could be substantial
and may require us or our potential hosting customers to cease certain or all operations and could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current and future legislation and
rulemaking regarding digital assets may result in extraordinary, non-recurring expenses and could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current and future legislation and rulemaking by
the CFTC and SEC or other regulators, including interpretations released by a regulatory authority, may impact the manner in which digital
assets are treated. For example, digital assets derivatives are not excluded from the definition of “commodity future” by
the CFTC. Furthermore, according to the CFTC, digital assets fall within the definition of a commodity under the Commodities Exchange
Act (the “CEA”) and as a result, we may be required to register and comply with additional regulations under the CEA, including
additional periodic reporting and disclosure standards and requirements. We may also be required to register as a commodity pool operator
and to register as a commodity pool with the CFTC through the National Futures Association. If we are required to register with the CFTC
or another governmental or self-regulatory authority, the scope of our business and operations may be constrained by the rules of such
authority and we may be forced to incur additional expenses in the form of licensing fees, professional fees and other costs of compliance.
The SEC has issued guidance and made numerous statements
regarding the application of securities laws to digital assets. The SEC’s guidance has included its position that the initial offering
of digital currencies for the purpose of raising capital constitutes a securities transaction, and therefore are subject to the federal
securities laws.
Although our activities are not focused on raising
capital or assisting others that do so, the federal securities laws are very broad. We cannot provide assurance as to whether the SEC
will continue or increase its enforcement with respect to digital assets, including taking enforcement action against any person engaged
in the sale of unregistered securities in violation of the Securities Act or any person acting as an unregistered investment company in
violation of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”). Because the SEC has held that
certain digital assets are securities based on the current rules and law, we may be required to register and comply with the rules and
regulations under federal securities laws.
We cannot be certain as to how future regulatory
developments will impact the treatment of digital assets under the law, including, but not limited to, whether digital assets will be
classified as a security, commodity, currency and/or new or other existing classification. Such additional regulations may result in extraordinary,
non- recurring expenses, thereby materially and adversely affecting an investment in us. If we determine not to comply with such additional
regulatory and registration requirements, we may seek to cease certain or all of our operations. Any such action could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Federal or state agencies may impose
additional regulatory burdens on our business. Changing laws and regulations and changing enforcement policies and priorities have the
potential to cause additional expenditures, restrictions, and delays in connection with our business operations.
Federal and state laws and regulations may be subject
to change or changes in enforcement policies or priorities, including changes that may result from changes in the political landscape
and changing technologies. Future legislation and regulations, changes to existing laws and regulations, or interpretations thereof, or
changes in enforcement policies or priorities, could require significant management attention and cause additional expenditures, restrictions,
and delays in connection with our business operations.
Increasing scrutiny and changing expectations
from investors, lenders, customers, government regulators and other market participants with respect to our Environmental, Social and
Governance (“ESG”) policies may impose additional costs on us or expose us to additional risks.
Companies across all industries and around the
globe are facing increasing scrutiny relating to their ESG policies. Investors, lenders and other market participants are increasingly
focused on ESG practices and in recent years have placed increasing importance on the implications and social cost of their investments.
In February 2021, the Acting Chair of the SEC issued a statement directing the Division of Corporation Finance to enhance its focus on
climate-related disclosure in public company filings and in March 2021 the SEC announced the creation of a Climate and ESG Task Force
in the Division of Enforcement. The increased focus and activism related to ESG may hinder our access to capital, as investors and lenders
may reconsider their capital investment allocation as a result of their assessment of our ESG practices. If we do not adapt to or comply
with investor, lender or other industry shareholder expectations and standards and potential government regulations, which are evolving
but may relate to the suitable deployment of electric power, or which are perceived to have not responded appropriately to the growing
concern for ESG issues, our reputation may suffer, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
We may be subject
to risks associated with misleading and/or fraudulent disclosure or use by the creators of digital assets. Generally, we rely primarily
on a combination of white papers and other disclosure documents prepared by the creators of applicable digital assets, as well as on our
management’s ability to obtain adequate information to evaluate the potential implications of transacting in these digital assets.
However, such white papers and other disclosure documents and information may contain misleading and/or fraudulent statements (which may
include statements concerning the creators’ ability to deliver in a timely fashion the product and/or service disclosed in their
white papers and other disclosure documents) and/or may not reveal any unlawful activities by the creators. Recently, there has been an
increasing number of investigations and lawsuits by the SEC and the CFTC involving digital asset creators for fraud and misappropriation,
among other charges. Additionally, FinCEN has increased its enforcement efforts involving digital asset creators regarding compliance
with anti-money laundering and Know-Your-Customer laws.
To the extent that
any of these creators make misleading and/or fraudulent disclosures or do not comply with federal, state or foreign laws, or if we are
unable to uncover all material information about these digital assets and/or their creators, we may not be able to make a fully informed
business decision relating to our transacting in or otherwise involving such digital assets, which could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to Digital Assets
Because there has been limited precedent
set for financial accounting for Bitcoin and other digital assets, the determinations that we have made for how to account for digital
assets transactions may be subject to change.
Because there has been limited precedent set for
the financial accounting for Bitcoin and other digital assets and related revenue recognition and no official guidance has yet been provided
by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or the SEC, it is unclear how companies may in the future be required to account for digital
asset transactions and assets and related revenue recognition. A change in regulatory or financial accounting standards could result in
the necessity to change the accounting methods we currently intend to employ in respect of our anticipated revenues and assets and restate
any financial statements produced based on those methods. Such a restatement could adversely affect our business, prospects, financial
condition and results of operation.
Digital assets exchanges and other
trading venues are relatively new and, in some cases, partially unregulated and may therefore be more exposed to fraud and failure.
To the extent that digital asset exchanges or other
trading venues are involved in fraud or experience security failures or other operational issues, a reduction in digital asset prices
could occur. Digital asset market prices depend, directly or indirectly, on the prices set on exchanges and other trading venues, which
are new and, in most cases, largely unregulated as compared to established, regulated exchanges for securities, derivatives and other
currencies. For example, during the past three years, a number of Bitcoin exchanges have been closed due to fraud, business failure or
security breaches. Failures of digital asset companies have accelerated in 2022 with the substantial drop in digital assets prices. In
many of these instances, the customers of the closed Bitcoin exchanges were not compensated or made whole for the partial or complete
losses of their account balances in such Bitcoin exchanges. While smaller exchanges are less likely to have the infrastructure and capitalization
that provide larger exchanges with additional stability, larger exchanges may be more likely to be appealing targets for hackers and “malware”
(i.e., software used or programmed by attackers to disrupt computer operation, gather sensitive information, or gain access to private
computer systems) and may be more likely to be targets of regulatory enforcement action. Continued failures of digital asset companies,
and resulting customer losses, could create a crisis of confidence in digital assets that jeopardizes the future of the industry, and
by extension our business.
Digital asset transactions are irrevocable
and, if stolen or incorrectly transferred, digital assets may be irretrievable. As a result, any incorrectly executed digital asset transactions
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Typically, digital asset transactions are not,
from an administrative perspective, reversible without the consent and active participation of the recipient of the transaction or, in
theory, control or consent of a majority of the processing power on the applicable network. Once a transaction has been confirmed and
verified in a block that is added to the network blockchain, an incorrect transfer of a digital asset or a theft of a digital asset generally
will not be reversible and we may not be capable of seeking compensation for any such transfer or theft. Although transfers of any digital
assets we hold will regularly be made to or from vendors, consultants, services providers, etc., it is possible that, through computer
or human error, or through theft or criminal action, our digital assets could be transferred from us in incorrect amounts or to unauthorized
third parties. To the extent that we are unable to seek a corrective transaction with such third party or are incapable of identifying
the third party that has received our digital assets through error or theft, we will be unable to revert or otherwise recover our incorrectly
transferred digital assets. To the extent that we are unable to seek redress for such error or theft, such loss could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may not have adequate sources of
recovery if the digital assets held by us are lost, stolen or destroyed due to third-party digital asset services, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Certain digital assets held by us may be a third-party
digital asset service. We intend to evaluate the security procedures of any third party service to ensure that its dual authentication
security, secured facilities, segregated accounts and cold storage are reasonably designed to safeguard our Bitcoin from theft, loss,
destruction or other issues relating to hackers and technological attack. Nevertheless, the security procedures cannot guarantee the prevention
of any loss due to a security breach, software defect or act of God that may be borne by us. In addition, our service providers may be
have limited liability under their services agreement, which may limit our ability to recover losses relating to our Bitcoin. If such
digital assets are lost, stolen or destroyed under circumstances rendering a third party liable to us, it is possible that the responsible
third party may not have the financial resources or insurance sufficient to satisfy any or all of our claims against the third party,
or have the ability to retrieve, restore or replace the lost, stolen or destroyed digital assets due to governing network protocols and
the strength of the cryptographic systems associated with such digital assets. To the extent that we are unable to recover on any of our
claims against any such third party, such loss could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Losses relating to our business may
be uninsured, or insurance may be limited.
Our hosting and colocation operations are subject
to hazards and risks normally associated with the daily operations of hosting facilities. Currently, we do not have any insurance, except
for insurance covering loss of equipment while in transit. Once our operations become more significant, we plan to obtain insurance that
is standard for businesses of our nature, including insurance covering business interruption for lost profits, property and casualty,
public liability, commercial employee, workers’ compensation, personal property and auto liability. However, until we procure such
insurance, we are subject to wide variety of business risks without any insurance to reimburse us for any damages we suffer. However,
it may not be possible, either because of a lack of available policies, limits on coverage or prohibitive cost, for us to obtain insurance
of any type that would cover losses associated with our digital asset portfolio. In general, we anticipate that certain losses related
to our business may be uninsurable, or the cost of insuring against these losses may not be economically justifiable.
The digital assets held by us are not insured.
Therefore, a loss may be suffered with respect to our digital assets which is not covered by insurance and for which no person is liable
in damages which could adversely affect our operations and, consequently, an investment in us.
The impact of geopolitical, economic
or other events on the supply of and demand for digital assets is uncertain, but could motivate large-scale sales of digital assets, which
could result in a reduction in the price of such digital asset and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
As an alternative to fiat currencies that are backed
by central governments, digital assets, which are relatively new, are subject to supply and demand forces based upon the desirability
of an alternative, decentralized means of buying and selling goods and services. It is unclear how this supply and demand will be impacted
by geopolitical events. Nevertheless, political or economic crises may motivate large-scale acquisitions or sales of digital assets either
globally or locally. Large-scale sales of digital assets likely would result in a reduction in the price of the subject digital asset
and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Digital assets, such as Bitcoin, face
significant scaling obstacles that can lead to high fees or slow transaction settlement times and any mechanisms of increasing the scale
of digital asset settlement may significantly alter the competitive dynamics in the market.
Digital assets face significant scaling obstacles
that can lead to high fees or slow transaction settlement times, and attempts to increase the volume of transactions may not be effective.
Scaling digital assets, and particularly Bitcoin, is essential to the widespread acceptance of digital assets as a means of payment, which
is necessary to the growth and development of our business.
Many digital asset networks face significant scaling
challenges. For example, digital assets are limited with respect to how many transactions can occur per second. In this respect, Bitcoin
may be particularly affected as it relies on the “proof of work” validation, which due to its inherent characteristics may
be particularly hard to scale to allow simultaneous processing of multiple daily transactions by users. Participants in the digital asset
ecosystem debate potential approaches to increasing the average number of transactions per second that the network can handle and have
implemented mechanisms or are researching ways to increase scale, such as “sharding,” which is a term for a horizontal partition
of data in a database or search engine, which would not require every single transaction to be included in every single miner’s
or validator’s block.
There is no guarantee that any of the mechanisms
in place or being explored for increasing the scale of settlement of digital asset transactions will be effective, how long they will
take to become effective or whether such mechanisms will be effective for all digital assets. There is also a risk that any mechanisms
of increasing the scale of digital asset settlements may significantly alter the competitive dynamics in the digital asset market and
may adversely affect the value of Bitcoin and the price of our common stock. Any of which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results.
The IRS and certain states have taken
the position that digital assets are property for income tax purposes.
In early 2014, the IRS issued basic guidance on
the tax treatment of digital assets. The IRS has taken the position that a digital asset is “property” rather than “currency”
for tax purposes. Thus, general tax principles applicable to property transactions apply to the acquisition, ownership, use or disposition
of digital assets. This overall treatment creates a potential tax liability for, and potential tax reporting requirements applicable to
us in any circumstance where we mine or otherwise acquire, own or dispose of a digital asset. In 2019, the IRS issued additional guidance specifically relating
to the taxation consequences that could arise from a digital asset hard fork event in which a new unit
of digital asset may or may not be received, and released frequently asked questions to address certain
digital asset topics such as basis, gain or loss on the sale or exchange of certain kinds of digital assets and how to determine the fair
market value of such digital assets. The IRS’s treatment of digital assets as “property” may prevent the widespread
adoption of digital assets in retail transactions, due to the need to report each transaction as a separate taxable event and track the
tax basis of all digital assets used in a transaction.
There is no guarantee that the IRS will not alter
its position with respect to the taxation of digital assets, or that legislation or judicial determinations in the future will not result
in a tax treatment of digital assets and transactions in digital assets for U.S. federal and state tax purposes that differs from the
treatment described above. You are urged to consult your own tax advisor as to the tax implications of our acquisition, ownership, use
and disposition of digital assets. The taxation of digital assets for state, local or foreign tax purposes may not be the same as the
taxation of digital assets for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
In addition, under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of
2017 (the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act”), as of January 1, 2018, “like-kind exchange” treatment does not apply
to digital assets. This means that gain from the sale or exchange of digital assets cannot be deferred by undertaking an exchange of one
type of virtual currency for another.
Certain states, including New York and New Jersey,
generally follow IRS guidance with respect to the treatment of digital assets for state income tax purposes, but it is unclear if other
states will do so. Transactions involving digital assets for other goods and services also may be subject to sales and use or similar
taxes under barter transaction treatment or otherwise. The treatment of digital assets for state income tax and sales tax purposes may
have negative consequences, including the imposition of a greater tax burden on investors in digital assets or a higher cost with respect
to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of digital assets generally. In either case, this could have a negative effect on prices
in the relevant digital asset exchange market and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Foreign jurisdictions also may elect to treat digital
assets in a manner that results in adverse tax consequences. To the extent that a foreign jurisdiction with a significant share of the
market of digital asset owners or users imposes onerous tax burdens on such owners or users, or imposes sales, use or value added tax
on purchases and sales of digital assets for fiat currency, such actions could result in decreased demand for digital assets in such jurisdiction,
which could impact the price of digital assets and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Changes to, or changes to interpretations
of, the U.S. federal, state, local or other jurisdictional tax laws could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
All statements contained herein concerning U.S.
federal income tax (or other tax) consequences are based on existing law and interpretations thereof. The tax regimes to which we are
subject or under which we operate, including income and non-income taxes, are unsettled and may be subject to significant change.
While some of these changes could be beneficial, others could negatively affect our after-tax returns. Accordingly, no assurance
can be given that the currently anticipated tax treatment will not be modified by legislative, judicial or administrative changes, possibly
with retroactive effect. In addition, no assurance can be given that any tax authority or court will agree with any particular interpretation
of the relevant laws.
In 2021, significant changes to U.S. federal income
tax laws were proposed, including increasing the U.S. income tax rate applicable to corporations from 21% to 28% and changes implicating
information reporting with respect to digital assets. Congress may include some or all of these proposals in future legislation. There
is uncertainty regarding whether these proposals will be enacted and, if enacted, their scope, when they would take effect, and whether
they would have retroactive effect.
State, local or other jurisdictions could impose,
levy or otherwise enforce tax laws against us. Tax laws and regulations at the state and local levels frequently change, especially in
relation to the interpretation of existing tax laws for new and emerging industries, and we cannot always reasonably predict the impact
from, or the ultimate cost of compliance with, current or future taxes, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Concerns about greenhouse gas emissions
and global climate change may result in environmental taxes, charges, assessments or penalties and could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The effects of human activity on global climate
change have attracted considerable public and scientific attention, as well as the attention of the United States and other foreign governments.
Efforts are being made to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, particularly those from coal combustion power plants, some of which plants
we may rely upon for power. The added cost of any environmental taxes, charges, assessments or penalties levied on such power plants could
be passed on to us, increasing the cost to run our hosting facilities. Any enactment of laws or promulgations of regulations regarding
greenhouse gas emissions by the United States, or any domestic or foreign jurisdiction in which we conduct business, could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Latency in confirming transactions
on a network could result in a loss of confidence in the network, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Latency in confirming transactions on a network
can be caused by a number of factors, such as transaction processors ceasing to support the network and/or supporting a different network.
To the extent that any transaction processors cease to record transactions on a network, such transactions will not be recorded on the
blockchain of the network until a block is solved by a transaction processor that does not require the payment of transaction fees or
other incentives. Currently, there are no known incentives for transaction processors to elect to exclude the recording of transactions
in solved blocks. However, to the extent that any such incentives arise (for example, with respect to Bitcoin, a collective movement among
transaction processors or one or more transaction processing pools forcing Bitcoin users to pay transaction fees as a substitute for,
or in addition to, the award of new Bitcoin upon the solving of a block), transaction processors could delay the recording and verification
of a significant number of transactions on a network’s blockchain. If such latency became systemic, and sustained, it could result
in greater exposure to double-spending transactions and a loss of confidence in the applicable network, which could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, increasing growth and popularity of
digital assets, as well as non-digital asset related applications that utilize blockchain technology on certain networks,
can cause congestion and backlog, and as result, increase latency on such networks. An increase in congestion and backlogs could result
in longer transaction confirmation times, an increase in unconfirmed transactions (that is, transactions that have yet to be included
in a block on a network and therefore are not yet completed transactions), higher transaction fees and an overall decrease in confidence
in a particular network, which could ultimately affect our ability to transact on that particular network and, in turn, could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Significant or unexpected changes to
our transaction processing operations may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We and our potential customers are engaged in the
business of verifying and confirming transactions on a blockchain, also known as transaction processing, or “mining.” We may
have to make changes to the specifications of our transaction processing operations for any number of reasons beyond our control (e.g.,
increased governmental and quasi-governmental regulation of blockchain-related digital assets; changes in methods of validating digital
asset transactions; creation of new digital assets; general economic conditions; changes in consumer demographics and public tastes and
preferences; and rising energy costs, among other reasons), or we may be unable to develop our transaction processing operations in a
manner that realizes those specifications or any form of functioning and profitable transaction processing operations. Furthermore, it
is still possible that our transaction processing operations may experience malfunctions, electrical power failure, hacking, cybersecurity
breaches or otherwise fail to be adequately developed or maintained. Any of the above risks, which could also impact our potential hosting
customers, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Currently, we believe there is relatively
limited use of digital assets in the retail and commercial marketplace in comparison to relatively sizable use by speculators, thus contributing
to price volatility that could adversely affect an investment in our stock.
We believe digital assets have not yet gained widespread
acceptance as a means of payment for goods and services by any major retail or commercial outlets. We believe a significant portion of
the demand for digital assets is generated by speculators and investors, some of whom may have no knowledge of the inner workings of those
assets. Certain of these investors may seek to profit from the short-term or long-term holding of digital assets, and thus, may contribute
to digital asset price volatility. A lack of expansion in the use of digital assets in retail and commercial markets, or a contraction
of such use, may result in increased price volatility of digital assets or a reduction in the market price of digital assets or in the
demand for digital assets which would reduce the demand of our hosting and colocation services or in the value of the digital assets held
by us, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may diversify our business by mining
or investing in additional digital assets which could require significant investment or expose us to trading risks.
The field of digital assets is constantly expanding
with over 4,000 digital assets in existence as of January 2021. We intend to evaluate the potential for mining or investing in existing,
new and alternative digital assets. To the extent we elect to commence activities to generate digital assets, we would be required to
invest our assets either to obtain mining equipment configured to generate digital assets based on a “proof of work” protocol
or to post “stakes” to generate digital assets based on a “proof of stake” protocol. In addition, or in the alternative,
we may trade our digital assets for other digital assets on centralized or decentralized exchanges. Optimization of such trades may vary
depending on the exchange on which the trade is conducted because we may not have access to all exchanges on which such trades are available.
Further, trading on centralized and decentralized exchanges may expose us to additional risks if such exchanges experience breaches of
security measures, system errors or vulnerabilities, software corruption, hacking or other irregularities. Any new digital asset obtained
through generation or trading may be more volatile or fail to increase in value compared to digital assets we currently hold. As a result,
any investment in different digital assets may not achieve our goals, may be viewed negatively by analysts or investors and may negatively
affect our revenues and results of operations.
If the transaction fees for recording
digital assets in a blockchain increase, demand for digital assets may be reduced and prevent the expansion of the networks to retail
merchants and commercial business, resulting in a reduction in the acceptance or price of digital assets.
As the number of digital assets awarded for solving
a block in a blockchain decreases, the incentive for mining participants to contribute processing power to networks will transition from
a set reward to transaction fees. In order to incentivize mining participants to continue to contribute processing power to the networks,
the network may transition from a set reward to transaction fees earned upon solving for a block. If mining participants demand higher
transaction fees to record transactions in a blockchain or a software upgrade automatically charges fees for all transactions, the cost
of using digital assets may increase and the marketplace may be reluctant to accept digital assets as a means of payment. Existing users
may be motivated to switch from one digital asset to another or back to fiat currency. Decreased use and demand for digital assets may
adversely affect their value and result in a reduction in the value of our common stock.
If the award of new digital assets
and/or transaction fees for solving blocks is not sufficiently high to incentivize transaction processors, such processors may reduce
or cease expending processing power on a particular network, which could negatively impact the utility of the network, reduce the value
of its digital assets and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
As the number of digital assets rewarded to transaction
processors for validating blocks in a network decreases, the incentive for transaction processors to continue contributing processing
power to the network may shift toward transaction fees. Such a shift may increase the transaction fees on a network. Higher transaction
fees may reduce the utility of a network for an end user, which may cause end users to reduce or stop their use of that network. In such
case, the price of the relevant digital asset may decline substantially and could go to zero. Such reduced price and demand for, and use
of, the relevant digital asset and network, either as it applies to our transaction processing services or to those of our potential hosting
customers, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
As more processing power is added to
a network, our relative percentage of total processing power on that network is expected to decline absent significant capital investment,
which has an adverse impact on our ability to generate revenue from processing transactions on that network and could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Processing power on networks has been increasing
rapidly over time while the rewards and transaction fees available on those networks tends to decline over time. In order to grow or maintain
the revenue we generate from processing transactions on such networks, we are required to invest significant capital to acquire new computer
servers, expand our power capacity and otherwise increase our effective processing power on such networks. In the event we are unable
to invest sufficient capital to grow or maintain the level of our processing power on a network relative to the total processing power
of such network, our revenue from the applicable network will decline over time and as a result, it could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, a decrease in the price of computer
servers may result in an increase in transaction processors, which may lead to more competition for fees in a particular network. In the
event we are unable to realize adequate fees on a network due to increased competition, our revenue from the applicable network will decline
over time and in turn, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may only have limited control over
our mining operation.
Our mining operation comprises blockchain mining
technologies that depend on a network of computers to run certain software programs to solve complex transactions in competition with
other mining operations and to process transactions. Because of this less centralized model and the complexity of our mining operation,
we have limited control over the success of our mining operations. While we participate in mining pools to combine our mining operations
with other mining participants to increase processing power to solve blocks, there can be no assurance that such pools will adequately
address this risk.
Our reliance on third-party mining
pool service providers for our mining revenue payouts may have a negative impact on our operations.
We may utilize third party mining pools to receive
our mining rewards from a given network. Mining pools allow mining participants to combine their processing power, which increases the
chances of solving a block and getting paid by the network. The rewards are distributed by the pool operator, proportionally to our contribution
to the pool’s overall mining power used to generate each block. We are dependent on the accuracy of the mining pool operator’s
record keeping to accurately record the total processing power provided to the pool for a given Bitcoin or other digital asset mining
application in order to assess the proportion of that total processing power we provided. While we have internal methods of tracking both
our power provided and the total power used by the pool, the mining pool operator uses its own record-keeping to determine our proportion
of a given reward. We have little means of recourse against the mining pool operator if we determine the proportion of the reward paid
out to us by a mining pool operator is incorrect, other than leaving the pool. If we are unable to consistently obtain accurate proportionate
rewards from our mining pool operators, we may experience reduced reward for our efforts, which would have an adverse effect on our business
and operations.
Malicious actors or botnet may obtain
control of more than 50% of the processing power on the Bitcoin or other network.
If a malicious actor or botnet (a volunteer or
hacked collection of computers controlled by networked software coordinating the actions of the computers) obtains a majority of the processing
power dedicated to mining on the Bitcoin or other network, it may be able to alter the blockchain on which the Bitcoin or other network
and most Bitcoin or other digital asset transactions rely by constructing fraudulent blocks or preventing certain transactions from completing
in a timely manner, or at all. The malicious actor or botnet could control, exclude, or modify the ordering of transactions, though it
could not generate new Bitcoin or digital assets or transactions using such control. The malicious actor could “double-spend”
its own Bitcoin or digital assets (i.e., spend the same Bitcoin or digital assets in more than one transaction) and prevent the confirmation
of other users’ transactions for so long as it maintained control. To the extent that such malicious actor or botnet did not yield
its control of the processing power on the Bitcoin or other network, or the Bitcoin or other community did not reject the fraudulent blocks
as malicious, reversing any changes made to the blockchain may not be possible.
Although there are no known reports of malicious
activity or control of the Bitcoin blockchain achieved through controlling over 50% of the processing power on the network, it is believed
that certain mining pools may have exceeded the 50% threshold. The possible crossing of the 50% threshold indicates a greater risk in
that a single mining pool could exert authority over the validation of Bitcoin transactions. To the extent that the Bitcoin or other digital
asset ecosystems, including developers and administrators of mining pools, do not act to ensure greater decentralization of Bitcoin or
other digital asset mining processing power, the feasibility of a malicious actor obtaining control of the processing power on the Bitcoin
or other network will increase, which may adversely affect an investment us.
Transaction processing operators may
sell a substantial amount of digital assets into the market, which may exert downward pressure on the price of the applicable digital
asset and, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Transaction processing requires the investment
of significant capital for the acquisition of hardware, leasing or purchasing space, involves substantial electricity costs and requires
the employment of personnel to operate the data facilities, which may lead transaction processing operators to liquidate their positions
in digital assets to fund these capital requirements. In addition, if the reward of new digital assets for transaction processing declines,
and/or if transaction fees are not sufficiently high, profit margins for transaction processing operators may be reduced, and such operators
may be more likely to sell a higher percentage of their digital assets. Whereas it is believed that individual operators in past years
were more likely to hold digital assets for more extended periods, the immediate selling of newly transacted digital assets by operators
may increase the supply of such digital assets on the applicable exchange market, which could create downward pressure on the price of
the digital assets and, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
To the extent that the profit margins
of digital asset mining operations are not high, mining participants are more likely to sell their earned Bitcoin, which could constrain
Bitcoin prices.
Over the past few years, digital asset mining operations
have evolved from individual users mining with computer processors, graphics processing units and first-generation application-specific
integrated circuit (“ASIC”) servers. Currently, new processing power is predominantly added by incorporated and unincorporated
“professionalized” mining operations. Professionalized mining operations may use proprietary hardware or sophisticated ASIC
machines acquired from ASIC manufacturers. They require the investment of significant capital to acquire this hardware, to lease operating
space (often in data centers or warehousing facilities), and to pay the costs of electricity and labor to operate the mining farms. As
a result, professionalized mining operations are of a greater scale than prior mining operations and have more defined and regular expenses
and liabilities. These regular expenses and liabilities require professionalized mining operations to maintain profit margins on the sale
of digital assets. To the extent the price of digital assets decline and such profit margin is constrained, professionalized mining participants
are incentivized to more immediately sell digital assets earned from mining operations, whereas it is believed that individual mining
participants in past years were more likely to hold newly mined digital assets for more extended periods. The immediate selling of newly
mined digital assets greatly increases the trading volume of the digital assets, creating downward pressure on the market price of digital
asset rewards. The extent to which the value of digital assets mined by a professionalized mining operation exceeds the allocable capital
and operating costs determines the profit margin of such operation. A professionalized mining operation may be more likely to sell a higher
percentage of its newly mined digital assets rapidly if it is operating at a low profit margin and it may partially or completely cease
operations if its profit margin is negative. In a low profit margin environment, a higher percentage could be sold more rapidly, thereby
potentially depressing digital asset prices. Lower digital asset prices could result in further tightening of profit margins for professionalized
mining operations creating a network effect that may further reduce the price of digital assets until mining operations with higher operating
costs become unprofitable forcing them to reduce mining power or cease mining operations temporarily. Such circumstances could have a
material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of Bitcoin and any other digital assets we
mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account.
The “halving” of rewards
available on the Bitcoin network, or the reduction of rewards on other networks, has had and in the future could have a negative impact
on our ability to generate revenue as our customers may not have an adequate incentive to continue transaction processing and customers
may cease transaction processing operations altogether, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
Under the current protocols governing the Bitcoin
network, the reward for validating a new block on that network is cut in half from time to time, which has been referred to in our industry
as the “halving.” When the Bitcoin network was first launched, the reward for validating a new block was 50 Bitcoin. In 2012,
the reward for validating a new block was reduced to 25 Bitcoin. In July 2016, the reward for validating a new block was reduced to 12.5
Bitcoin, and in May 2020, the reward was further reduced to 6.25 Bitcoin. In addition, other networks may operate under rules that, or
may alter their rules to, limit the distribution of new digital assets. We, and to our knowledge, our potential hosting customers, currently
rely on these rewards to generate a significant portion of our total revenue. If the award of digital assets for solving blocks and transaction
fees are not sufficiently high, neither we nor our customers may have an adequate incentive to continue transaction processing and may
cease transaction processing operations altogether, which as a result may significantly reduce demand for our hosting services. As a result,
the halving of available rewards on the Bitcoin network, or any reduction of rewards on other networks, would have a negative impact on
our revenues and may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, the reduction of rewards may reduce
our profit margins, which could result in us selling a substantial portion of our digital assets, which are subject to high volatility.
If we are forced to sell digital assets at low prices, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
We expect to sell most or all of our
digital assets to pay for costs and expenses, which will reduce the amount of digital assets we hold, thus preventing us from recognizing
any gain from the appreciation in value of the digital assets we have sold and may sell in the future.
We expect to sell most or all of the digital assets
that we earn from mining or hosting to pay for costs and expenses we incur, capital expenditures and other working capital, irrespective
of then-current digital asset prices. When we sell a digital asset, we are unable to benefit from any future appreciation in the underlying
value of that digital asset. However, we also avoid a loss on the digital asset to the extent it declines in price after the sale.
Consequently, our digital assets may be sold at
a time when the price is lower than it otherwise might be in the future, which could reduce the gain we might have realized on the sale
of that digital asset at a different time. If we sell any digital assets in the future, the loss of potential realized gains from the
sale of such digital assets could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Digital assets are subject to extreme
price volatility. The value of digital assets is dependent on a number of factors, any of which could have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We expect that a large portion of our revenue will
come from processing blockchain transactions in the form of Bitcoin. We believe the value of digital assets related to our business is
dependent on a number of factors, including, but not limited to:
|
• |
|
global digital asset supply; |
|
• |
|
global digital asset demand, which can be influenced by the growth of retail merchants’ and commercial businesses’ acceptance of digital assets as payment for goods and services, the security of online digital asset exchanges and digital wallets that hold digital assets, the perception that the use and holding of digital assets is safe and secure, and the regulatory restrictions on their use; |
|
• |
|
investors’ expectations with respect to the rate of inflation of fiat currencies; |
|
• |
|
investors’ expectations with respect to the rate of deflation of digital assets; |
|
• |
|
cyber theft of digital assets from online wallet providers, or news of such theft from such providers or from individuals’ online wallets; |
|
• |
|
the availability and popularity of businesses that provide digital asset-related services; |
|
• |
|
fees associated with processing a digital asset transaction; |
|
• |
|
changes in the software, software requirements or hardware requirements underlying digital assets; |
|
• |
|
changes in the rights, obligations, incentives, or rewards for the various participants in digital asset mining; |
|
• |
|
currency exchange rates, including the rates at which digital assets may be exchanged for fiat currencies; |
|
• |
|
fiat currency withdrawal and deposit policies on digital asset exchanges and liquidity on such exchanges; |
|
• |
|
interruptions in service or failures of major digital asset exchanges; |
|
• |
|
investment and trading activities of large investors, including private and registered funds, that may directly or indirectly invest in digital assets; |
|
• |
|
monetary policies of governments, trade restrictions, currency devaluations and revaluations; |
|
• |
|
regulatory measures, if any, that affect the use of digital assets, restrict digital assets as a form of payment, or limit the purchase of digital assets; |
|
• |
|
global or regional political, economic or financial events and conditions; |
|
• |
|
expectations that the value of digital assets will change in the near or long term. A decrease in the price of a single digital asset may cause volatility in the entire digital asset industry and may affect other digital assets. For example, a security breach that affects investor or user confidence in Bitcoin or another digital asset may affect the industry as a whole and may also cause the price of other digital assets to fluctuate; or |
|
• |
|
with respect to Bitcoin, increased competition from other forms of digital assets or payments services. |
Bitcoin and other digital assets have historically
experienced significant intraday and long-term price volatility, significantly impacted by momentum pricing. Momentum pricing typically
is associated with growth stocks and other assets whose valuation, as determined by the investing public, accounts for anticipated future
appreciation in value. The market price for digital assets is determined using data from various digital asset exchanges, over-the-counter markets,
digital asset futures markets, derivative platforms and other digital asset investment vehicles. We believe that momentum pricing may
have resulted, and may continue to result, in significant and rampant speculation regarding future appreciation (or depreciation) in the
value of digital assets, inflating and making their market prices more volatile, even more so than with traditional asset classes, such
as equities. In addition, there is currently growing but limited acceptance of digital assets in the retail and commercial marketplace,
as compared to the demand generated by investors seeking a long-term value retention or by speculators seeking to profit from the short-
or long-term holding of such digital assets, which may contribute to their extreme levels of price volatility.
Even if shareholders are able to hold their common
stock for the long-term, their common stock may never generate a profit, since digital asset markets have historically experienced extended
periods of flat or declining prices, in addition to sharp fluctuations. Investors should be aware that there is no assurance that Bitcoin
or other digital assets will maintain their long-term value in terms of future purchasing power or that the acceptance of digital asset
payments by mainstream retail merchants and commercial businesses will continue to grow. If the price of Bitcoin or other digital assets
declines, we expect our profitability to decline.
Any loss or destruction of a private
key required to access a digital asset of ours is irreversible. We also may temporarily lose access to our digital assets.
Digital assets are each accessible and controllable
only by the possessor of both the unique public key and private key associated with the digital asset, wherein the public and private
keys are held in an offline or online digital wallet. To the extent a private key is lost, destroyed or otherwise compromised and no backup
of the private key is available, we will be unable to access the applicable digital asset associated with that private key and the private
key cannot be restored. As a result, any digital assets associated with such key could be irretrievably lost. Any loss of private keys
relating to digital wallets used to store the applicable digital assets could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Currently, we hold the majority of our
digital currencies in cold storage to reduce the risk of malfeasance, but this risk cannot be eliminated. In order to minimize
risk, we have established processes to manage wallets that are associated with our digital currency holdings. We utilize several
layers of threat reduction techniques, including: (i) the use of hardware wallets to store sensitive private key information; (ii) performance
of transactions offline; and (iii) offline generation storage and use of private keys. There can be no assurances that any processes
we have adopted or will adopt in the future are or will be secure or effective, and we would suffer significant and immediate adverse
effects if we suffered a loss of our digital currency due to an adverse software or cybersecurity event.
We are presently evaluating several third-party
custodial wallet alternatives with multi-signature enterprise storage solution to safeguard our digital assets from theft,
loss, destruction or other issues relating to hackers and technological attack. There can be no assurance that we will utilize such services,
as other new options may develop in the future, and if a custodial wallet is used there can be no assurance that such services will be
more secure than those that we presently employ.
Intellectual property rights claims
may adversely affect the operation of any or all of the networks.
Third parties may assert intellectual property
rights claims relating to the operation of digital assets and the holding and transfer of such assets. Regardless of the merit of any
intellectual property rights claims or other legal action, any threatened action that reduces confidence in the long-term viability of
any or all of the networks or other similar peer-to-peer networks, or in the ability of end-users to hold and transfer
digital assets, may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, a meritorious
intellectual property rights claim could prevent us and other end-users from holding or transferring the digital assets, which
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
A soft or hard fork on a network could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The rules governing a network’s protocol
are subject to constant change and, at any given time, there may be different groups of developers that can modify a network’s protocol.
As network protocols are not sold and their use does not generate revenues for their development teams, the core developers are generally
not compensated for maintaining and updating the network protocols. Consequently, there is a lack of financial incentive for developers
to maintain or develop networks and the core developers may lack the resources to adequately address emerging issues with network protocols.
Although the Bitcoin and other leading networks are currently supported by core developers, there can be no guarantee that such support
will continue or be sufficient in the future. To the extent that material issues arise with the Bitcoin or another network protocol and
the core developers and open-source contributors are unable to address the issues adequately or in a timely manner, the networks may be
adversely affected.
Any individual can download the applicable network
software and make any desired modifications that alter the protocols and software of the network, which are proposed to developers, users
and transaction processors on the applicable network through software downloads and upgrades, typically posted to development forums such
as GitHub.com. Such proposed modifications can be agreed upon, developed, adopted and implemented by a substantial majority of developers,
transaction processors and users, which, in such event, results in a “soft fork” or “hard fork” on the relevant
network. A “soft fork” occurs when an updated version of the validating protocol is still “backwards compatible”
with previous versions of the protocol. As a result, non-upgraded network participants with an older version of the validating
protocol will still recognize new blocks or transactions and may be able to confirm and validate a transaction; however, the functionality
of the non-upgraded network participant may be limited. Thus, non-upgraded network participants are incentivized to adopt
the updated version of the protocol. The occurrence of a soft fork could potentially destabilize transaction processing and increase transaction
and development costs and decrease trustworthiness of a network.
A “hard fork” occurs when the updated
version of the validating protocol is not “backwards compatible” with previous versions of the protocol, and therefore, requires
forward adoption by network participants in order to recognize new blocks, validate and verify transactions and maintain consensus on
the relevant blockchain. Since the updated version of the protocol is not backwards compatible, a hard fork can cause the relevant
blockchain to permanently diverge into two separate blockchains on a network. For example, in the case of Bitcoin, a hard fork created
two new digital assets: Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin Gold. The value of a newly created digital asset from a hard fork (“forked digital
asset”) may or may not have value in the long-run and may affect the price of other digital assets if interest and resources
are shifted away from previously existing digital assets to the forked digital asset. The value of a previously existing digital asset
after a hard fork is subject to many factors, including the market reaction and value of the forked digital asset and the occurrence of
other soft or hard forks in the future. As such, the value of certain digital assets could be materially reduced if existing and future
hard forks have a negative effect on their value.
If a soft fork or hard fork occurs on a network,
which we or our hosting customers are processing transactions or hold digital assets in, we may be required to upgrade our hardware or
software in order to continue our transaction processing operations, and there can be no assurance that we may be able to make such upgrades.
A soft fork or hard fork in a particular digital asset that we process could have a negative effect on the value of that digital asset
and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The digital assets held by us may be
subject to loss, damage, theft or restriction on access, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
or results of operations.
There is a risk that some or all of the digital
assets held or hosted by us could be lost, stolen or destroyed. We believe that the digital assets held or hosted by us and our mining
operation will be an appealing target to hackers or malware distributors seeking to destroy, damage or steal our digital assets. Our security
procedures and operational infrastructure may be breached due to the actions of outside parties, error or malfeasance of one of our employees,
or otherwise, and, as a result, an unauthorized party may obtain access to our digital asset accounts, private keys, data or digital assets.
Although we implement a number of security procedures with various elements such as two-factor verification, segregated accounts
and secured facilities and plan to implement the maintenance of data on computers and/or storage media that is not directly connected
to, or accessible from, the internet and/or networked with other computers, or (“cold storage”), to minimize the risk of loss,
damage and theft, and we update such security procedures whenever reasonably practicable, we cannot guarantee the prevention of such loss,
damage or theft, whether caused intentionally, accidentally or by an act of God.
Additionally, outside parties may attempt to fraudulently
induce our employees to disclose sensitive information in order to gain access to our infrastructure. As the techniques used to obtain
unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently, or may be designed to remain dormant until a predetermined
event, and often are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate
preventative measures. As technological change occurs, the security threats to our Bitcoin will likely adapt and previously unknown threats
may emerge. Our ability to adopt technology in response to changing security needs or trends may pose a challenge to the safekeeping of
our digital assets. To the extent we are unable to identify and mitigate or stop new security threats, our digital assets may be subject
to theft, loss, destruction or other attack.
Currently, we hold the majority of our
digital currencies in cold storage to reduce the risk of malfeasance, but this risk cannot be eliminated. In order to minimize
risk, we have established processes to manage wallets that are associated with our digital currency holdings. We utilize several
layers of threat reduction techniques, including: (i) the use of hardware wallets to store sensitive private key information; (ii) performance
of transactions offline; and (iii) offline generation storage and use of private keys. There can be no assurances that any processes
we have adopted or will adopt in the future are or will be secure or effective, and we would suffer significant and immediate adverse
effects if we suffered a loss of our digital currency due to an adverse software or cybersecurity event.
We are presently evaluating several third-party
custodial wallet alternatives with multi-signature enterprise storage solution to safeguard our digital assets from theft,
loss, destruction or other issues relating to hackers and technological attack. There can be no assurance that we will utilize such services,
as other new options may develop in the future, and if a custodial wallet is used there can be no assurance that such services will be
more secure than those that we presently employ.
Any of these events could expose us to liability,
damage our reputation, reduce customer confidence in our services and otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations. Furthermore, we believe that as our assets grow, we may become a more appealing target for security
threats, such as hackers and malware. If an actual or perceived breach of our digital asset accounts occurs, the market perception of
our effectiveness could be harmed.
Our ability to adopt technology in response
to changing security needs or trends poses a challenge to the safekeeping of our digital assets.
The history of digital asset exchanges has shown
that exchanges and large holders of digital assets must adapt to technological change in order to secure and safeguard their digital assets.
We currently keep all of our digital assets in a cold storage wallet in our name to reduce the risk of malfeasance, but this risk cannot
be eliminated. In order to minimize risk, we have established processes to manage wallets that are associated with our
digital currency holdings. We utilize several layers of threat reduction techniques, including: (i) the use of hardware wallets to
store sensitive private key information; (ii) performance of transactions offline; and (iii) offline generation storage and use of private
keys. There can be no assurances that any processes we have adopted or will adopt in the future are or will be secure or effective,
and we would suffer significant and immediate adverse effects if we suffered a loss of our digital currency due to an adverse software
or cybersecurity event.
We are presently evaluating several third-party
custodial wallet alternatives with multi-signature enterprise storage solution to safeguard our digital assets from theft, loss,
destruction or other issues relating to hackers and technological attack. There can be no assurance that we will utilize such services,
as other new options may develop in the future, and if a custodial wallet is used there can be no assurance that such services will be
more secure than those that we presently employ.
The digital assets held by us are not
subject to FDIC or SIPC protections.
We do not hold our digital assets with a banking
institution or a member of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) or the Securities Investor Protection Corporation
(“SIPC”), and to date, neither the FDIC nor the SIPC has extended any such protections to depositors of digital assets. Accordingly,
our digital assets are not subject to the protections by FDIC or SIPC member institutions and any loss of our digital assets could have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may not be able to maintain our
competitive position as digital asset networks experience increases in total network hash rate.
As the relative market prices of a digital asset,
such as Bitcoin, increases, more companies are encouraged to mine for that digital asset and as more miners are added to the network,
its total hash rate increases. In order for us to maintain its competitive position under such circumstances, we must increase our total
hash rate by acquiring and deploying more mining machines, including new miners with higher hash rates. There are currently only a few
companies capable of producing a sufficient number of machines with adequate quality to address the increased demand. If we are not able
to acquire and deploy additional miners on a timely basis, our proportion of the overall network hash rate will decrease and we will have
a lower chance of solving new blocks which will have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
To the extent that any miners cease
to record transactions in solved blocks, transactions that do not include the payment of a transaction fee will not be recorded on the
blockchain until a block is solved by a miner who does not require the payment of transaction fees. Any widespread delays in the recording
of transactions could result in a loss of confidence in that digital asset network, which could adversely impact an investment in us.
To the extent that any miners cease to record transactions
in solved blocks, such transactions will not be recorded on the blockchain. Currently, there are no known incentives for miners to elect
to exclude the recording of transactions in solved blocks; however, to the extent that any such incentives arise (e.g., a collective movement
among miners or one or more mining pools forcing Bitcoin users to pay transaction fees as a substitute for or in addition to the award
of new Bitcoins upon the solving of a block), actions of miners solving a significant number of blocks could delay the recording and confirmation
of transactions on the blockchain.
Any systemic delays in the recording and confirmation
of transactions on the blockchain could result in greater exposure to double-spending transactions and a loss of confidence in certain
or all digital asset networks, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating
results.
Our interactions with a blockchain may expose us
to SDN or blocked persons or cause us to violate provisions of law that did not contemplate distribute ledger technology.
The Office of Financial Assets Control of the U.S.
Department of Treasury (“OFAC”) requires us to comply with its sanction program and not conduct business with persons named
on its specially designated nationals (“SDN”) list. However, because of the pseudonymous nature of blockchain transactions,
we may inadvertently and without our knowledge engage in transactions with persons named on OFAC’s SDN list. Our internal policies
prohibit any transactions with such SDN individuals, but we may not be adequately capable of determining the ultimate identity of the
individual with whom we transact with respect to selling digital assets. In addition, in the future, OFAC or another regulator, may require
us to screen transactions for OFAC addresses or other bad actors before including such transactions in a block, which may increase our
compliance costs, decrease our anticipated transaction fees and lead to decreased traffic on our network. Any of these factors, consequently,
could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results.
Moreover, federal law prohibits any U.S. person
from knowingly or unknowingly possessing any visual depiction commonly known as child pornography. Recent media reports have suggested
that persons have imbedded such depictions on one or more blockchains. Because our business requires us to download and retain one or
more blockchains to effectuate our ongoing business, it is possible that such digital ledgers contain prohibited depictions without our
knowledge or consent. To the extent government enforcement authorities literally enforce these and other laws and regulations that are
impacted by decentralized distributed ledger technology, we may be subject to investigation, administrative or court proceedings, and
civil or criminal monetary fines and penalties, all of which could harm our reputation and could have a material adverse effect on our
business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results.
If we fail to maintain an effective
system of disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting, our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements
or comply with applicable regulations could be impaired.
As a public company, we will be subject to the
reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the rules and regulations of the applicable listing standards of
any exchange on which we list our common stock. We expect that the requirements of these rules and regulations will continue to increase
our legal, accounting and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming and costly and place significant
strain on our personnel, systems and resources.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things,
that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. We are continuing to develop
and refine our disclosure controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in
the reports that we will file with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules
and forms and that information required to be disclosed in reports under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our principal
executive and financial officers. We are also continuing to improve our internal control over financial reporting. In order to maintain
and improve the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, we anticipate that
we will have to expend significant resources, including accounting-related costs and significant management oversight.
Our current controls and any new controls that
we develop may become inadequate because of changes in conditions in our business. In addition, changes in accounting principles or interpretations
could also challenge our internal controls and require that we establish new business processes, systems and controls to accommodate such
changes. For example, we will need to implement new revenue recognition modules into our existing enterprise resource planning system
to facilitate the preparation of our financial statements under Accounting Standards Codification 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(“ASC 606”). We will also be required to adopt Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, Leases (Topic
842), which requires, among other things, lessees to recognize most leases on-balance sheet via a right of use asset
and lease liability, beginning January 1, 2022. We have limited experience with implementing the systems and controls that will be
necessary to operate as a public company, as well as adopting changes in accounting principles or interpretations mandated by the relevant
regulatory bodies. Additionally, if these new systems, controls or standards and the associated process changes do not give rise to the
benefits that we expect or do not operate as intended, it could adversely affect our financial reporting systems and processes, our ability
to produce timely and accurate financial reports or the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Moreover, our business
may be harmed if we experience problems with any new systems and controls that result in delays in their implementation or increased costs
to correct any post-implementation issues that may arise.
Further, while we do not believe that we have any
weaknesses in disclosure controls or internal controls over financial reporting at this time, we may discover material weaknesses in our
disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting in the future as our business outgrows our current infrastructure. Any
failure to develop or maintain effective controls or any difficulties encountered in their implementation or improvement could harm our
business or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations and may result in a restatement of our financial statements for prior periods.
Any failure to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting also could adversely affect the results of periodic
management evaluations and annual independent registered public accounting firm attestation reports regarding the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting that we will eventually be required to include in our periodic reports that will be filed with
the SEC. Ineffective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting could also cause investors to lose
confidence in our reported financial and other information, which would likely have a negative effect on the trading price of our common
stock. We are not currently required to comply with the SEC rules that implement Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and are therefore
not required to make a formal assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for that purpose. As a
public company, we will be required to provide an annual management report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting commencing with our second annual report on Form 10-K. Our independent registered public accounting firm is not required
to formally attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting while we are an emerging growth company.
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock
An active trading market for our common
stock may never develop or be sustained.
Our common stock is quoted on the Pink OTC
Market under the symbol “BMNR.” However, despite being quoted, there is currently no established market for our common stock.
We cannot assure you that an active trading market for our common stock will develop on that exchange or elsewhere or, if developed,
that any market will be sustained. Accordingly, we cannot assure you of the likelihood that an active trading market for our common stock
will develop or be maintained, your ability to sell your shares of our common stock when desired or the prices that you may obtain for
your shares.
The trading price of our common stock
may be volatile, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
The trading price of our common stock is likely
to be volatile and could be subject to fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control. These fluctuations
could cause you to lose all or part of your investment in our common stock as you might be unable to sell your shares at or above the
price you paid for those shares. Factors that could cause fluctuations in the trading price of our common stock include the following:
|
• |
|
price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time; |
|
• |
|
volatility in the trading prices and trading volumes of technology stocks; |
|
• |
|
volatility in the price of Bitcoin and other digital assets; |
|
• |
|
changes in operating performance and stock market valuations of other technology companies generally, or those in our industry in particular; |
|
• |
|
sales of shares of our common stock by us or our stockholders; |
|
• |
|
failure of securities analysts to maintain coverage of us, changes in financial estimates by securities analysts who follow our company, or our failure to meet these estimates or the expectations of investors; |
|
• |
|
the financial projections we may provide to the public, any changes in those projections, or our failure to meet those projections; |
|
• |
|
announcements by us or our competitors of new products, features, or services; |
|
• |
|
the public’s reaction to our press releases, other public announcements and filings with the SEC; |
|
• |
|
rumors and market speculation involving us or other companies in our industry; |
|
• |
|
actual or anticipated changes in our results of operations or fluctuations in our results of operations; |
|
• |
|
actual or anticipated developments in our business, our competitors’ businesses or the competitive landscape generally; |
|
• |
|
litigation involving us, our industry, or both, or investigations by regulators into our operations or those of our competitors; |
|
• |
|
developments or disputes concerning our intellectual property or other proprietary rights; |
|
• |
|
announced or completed acquisitions of businesses, products, services or technologies by us or our competitors; |
|
• |
|
new laws or regulations or new interpretations of existing laws or regulations applicable to our business; |
|
• |
|
changes in accounting standards, policies, guidelines, interpretations or principles; |
|
• |
|
any significant change in our management; and |
|
• |
|
general economic conditions and slow or negative growth of our markets. |
In addition, in the past, following periods of
volatility in the overall market and in the market price of a particular company’s securities, securities class action litigation
has often been instituted against these companies. This litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a
diversion of our management’s attention and resources.
The concentration of our capital stock
ownership with insiders will likely limit your ability to influence corporate matters.
As of November 4, 2022, our executive officers,
directors, significant shareholders and affiliated persons and entities collectively, beneficially owned approximately 57.5% of our outstanding
common stock and 100% of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, and as a result control 63.4% of the votes on any matter submitted
to a vote of shareholders. As a result, these persons and entities have the ability to exercise control over most matters that require
approval by our stockholders, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. Corporate action
might be taken even if other stockholders oppose them. This concentration of ownership might also have the effect of delaying or preventing
a change in control of our company that other stockholders may view as beneficial.
Compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 will require substantial financial and management resources.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 requires that we evaluate and report on our system of internal controls and, if and when we are no longer a “smaller reporting
company,” will require that we have such a system of internal controls audited. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal
controls, we could be subject to regulatory scrutiny, civil or criminal penalties and/or stockholder litigation. Any inability to provide
reliable financial reports could harm our business. Furthermore, any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties
encountered in the implementation of adequate controls over our financial processes and reporting in the future, could harm our operating
results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. Inferior internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence
in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our securities.
Future sales and issuances of our capital
stock or rights to purchase capital stock could result in additional dilution of the percentage ownership of our stockholders and could
cause our stock price to decline.
We expect to raise capital to fund our business
by issuing additional shares of common stock and/or securities convertible into common stock. Future sales and issuances of our capital
stock or rights to purchase our capital stock could result in substantial dilution to our existing stockholders. We may sell common stock,
convertible securities and other equity securities in one or more transactions at prices and in a manner as we may determine from time
to time. If we sell any such securities in subsequent transactions, investors may be materially diluted. New investors in such subsequent
transactions could gain rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of holders of our common stock.
We depend on key personnel and could
be harmed by the loss of their services because of the limited number of qualified people in our industry.
Because of our small size, we require the
continued service and performance of our management team, all of whom we consider to be key employees. Competition for highly qualified
employees in the data storage industry is intense. Our success will depend to a significant degree upon our ability to attract, train,
and retain highly skilled directors, officers, management, business, financial, legal, marketing, sales, and technical personnel and upon
the continued contributions of such people. In addition, we may not be able to retain our current key employees. The loss of the services
of one or more of our key personnel and our failure to attract additional highly qualified personnel could impair our ability to expand
our operations and provide service to our customers.
We currently do not have employment agreements
with most of our management and are not currently paying them any compensation. As a result, management’s only incentive for continuing
to work for us is due to their stock ownership in us. Our management will not be able to work for us indefinitely without being paid.
We plan to enter into employment contracts with management, and begin paying them compensation, once we are able to raise capital to fund
our business.
Substantial future sales of shares
of our common stock could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our
common stock in the public market following the completion of the merger, or the perception that these sales might occur, could depress
the market price of our common stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities. Many
of our existing equity holders have substantial unrecognized gains on the value of the equity they hold, and therefore they may take steps
to sell their shares or otherwise secure the unrecognized gains on those shares.
Our common stock market price and trading
volume could decline if securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our
business.
The trading market for our common stock will depend
in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. The analysts’ estimates
are based upon their own opinions and are often different from our estimates or expectations. If one or more of the analysts who cover
us downgrade our common stock or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, the price of our securities would likely
decline. If few securities analysts commence coverage of us, or if one or more of these analysts cease coverage of us or fail to publish
reports on us regularly, demand for our securities could decrease, which might cause the price and trading volume of our common stock
to decline.
We will incur costs and demands upon
management as a result of complying with the laws and regulations affecting public companies in the United States, which may harm our
business.
As a public company quoted in the United States,
we will incur significant additional legal, accounting and other expenses. In addition, changing laws, regulations and standards relating
to corporate governance and public disclosure, including regulations implemented by the SEC and any exchange on which we list our shares,
may increase legal and financial compliance costs and make some activities more time consuming. These laws, regulations and standards
are subject to varying interpretations, and as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided
by regulatory and governing bodies. We intend to invest resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards, and this investment
may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management’s time and attention from revenue-generating
activities to compliance activities. If, notwithstanding our efforts, we fail to comply with new laws, regulations and standards, regulatory
authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us, and our business may be harmed.
Failure to comply with these rules might also make
it more difficult for us to obtain certain types of insurance, including director and officer liability insurance, and we might be forced
to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. The impact of
these events would also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, on committees
of our board of directors or as members of senior management.
We do not intend to pay dividends for
the foreseeable future.
We have never declared nor paid cash dividends
on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain any future earnings to finance the operation and expansion of our business, and we
do not expect to declare or pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. As a result, stockholders must rely on sales of their common
stock after price appreciation as the only way to realize any future gains on their investment.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND
INDUSTRY AND MARKET DATA
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements
that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements are contained principally in the sections titled
“Prospectus Summary,” “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations” and “Business,” but are also contained elsewhere in this prospectus. In some cases, you can
identify forward-looking statements by the words “may,” “might,” “will,” “could,”
“would,” “should,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “objective,” “anticipate,”
“believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “project,” “potential,” “continue”
and “ongoing,” or the negative of these terms, or other comparable terminology intended to identify statements about the future,
although not all forward-looking statements contain these words. These statements relate to future events or our future financial
performance or condition and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results, levels
of activity, performance or achievement to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about:
| • | our projected financial position and estimated cash burn rate; |
| | |
| • | our estimates regarding expenses, future revenues and capital requirements; |
| | |
| • | the continued trading of digital currencies, and in particular Bitcoin, at prices that make it profitable to mine new digital currencies; |
| | |
| • | the availability of cost-efficient energy supplies available to mine digital currencies; |
| | |
| • | our need to raise substantial additional capital to fund our operation and necessary capital investments in our infrastructure; |
| | |
| • | our dependence on third party suppliers for key parts of our infrastructure; |
| | |
| • | our ability to enter into strategic partnerships for the development and commercialization of our service offerings our proposed product
candidates; |
| | |
| • | the possibility that a third party may claim we or our third-party licensors have infringed, misappropriated or otherwise violated
their intellectual property rights and that we may incur substantial costs and be required to devote substantial time defending against
claims against us; |
| | |
| • | our reliance on third parties; |
| | |
| • | our ability to expand our organization to accommodate potential growth and our ability to retain and attract key personnel; |
| | |
| • | market acceptance of our services, the size and growth of the potential markets for our current services and any future service offerings
we may seek to develop, and our ability to serve those markets; and |
| | |
| • | the successful development of our commercialization capabilities, including sales and marketing capabilities. |
These forward-looking statements are subject
to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those described in “Risk Factors.” Moreover, we operate in
a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risks emerge from time to time. It is not possible for our management to predict
all risks, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors,
may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements we may make. In light of these
risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this prospectus may not occur and
actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements.
You should not rely upon forward-looking statements
as predictions of future events. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable,
we cannot guarantee that the future results, levels of activity, performance or events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements
will be achieved or occur. Moreover, except as required by law, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy
and completeness of the forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements
for any reason after the date of this prospectus to conform these statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations.
You should read this prospectus and the documents
that we reference in this prospectus and have filed with the SEC as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms
a part with the understanding that our actual future results, levels of activity, performance and events and circumstances may be materially
different from what we expect.
Industry and Market Data
This prospectus contains industry, market and competitive
position data from our own internal estimates and research as well as independent industry publications, general publications and research
surveys and studies conducted by third parties. This data involves a number of assumptions and limitations, and while we believe that
the data from these industry publications that is included in this prospectus is reliable, we have not independently verified the data
from third-party sources. In addition, while we believe that the results and estimates from our internal research are reliable, such
results and estimates have not been verified by any independent source. The industry in which we operate is subject to a high degree of
uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, including those described in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus.
These and other factors could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in the estimates made by the independent parties
and by us.
USE OF PROCEEDS
All of the shares of common stock offered by the
selling stockholders pursuant to this prospectus will be sold by the selling stockholders for their respective accounts. We will not receive
any of the proceeds from these sales.
MARKET PRICE OF OUR COMMON
STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Our common stock trades on the Pink OTC Market
under the symbol “BMNR.” On November 9, 2022, the last reported sale price of our common stock on the Pink OTC Market was
$0.85 per share.
As of November 4, 2022, we had approximately
280 holders of record of our common stock. The actual number of stockholders is greater than this number of record holders and includes
stockholders who are beneficial owners but whose shares are held in street name by brokers and other nominees. This number of holders
of record also does not include stockholders whose shares may be held in trust by other entities.
DIVIDEND POLICY
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends
on our capital stock. We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to
retain all available funds and any future earnings to support our operations and finance the growth and development of our business. Any
future determination related to our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon, among
other factors, our results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, business prospects, the
requirements of current or then-existing debt instruments and other factors our board of directors may deem relevant.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion and analysis
of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with “Selected Financial Data” and our financial statements
and related notes to those statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. This discussion and analysis and other parts of this prospectus
contain forward-looking statements based upon current beliefs, plans and expectations that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions.
Our actual results and the timing of selected events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements
as a result of several factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus. You should
carefully read the “Risk Factors” section of this prospectus to gain an understanding of the important factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements. Please also see the section entitled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Industry and Market Data” in this prospectus.
Overview
Since July 2021, our business has been as a blockchain
technology company that is building out industrial scale digital asset mining, equipment sales and hosting operations. The Company’s
primary business is hosting third-party equipment used in mining of digital asset coins and tokens, specifically Bitcoin, as well as self-mining
for its own account. Our state-of-the-art facilities will be specifically designed and constructed for housing advanced mining equipment.
Our data centers will provide power, racks, proprietary thermodynamic management (heat dissipation and airflow management), redundant
connectivity, 24/7 security, as well as software which provide infrastructure management and custom firmware that boost performance and
energy efficiency.
We plan to operate our data centers using
immersion cooling technology. Immersion cooling is the process of submerging computer components (or full servers) in a thermally, but
not electrically, conductive liquid (dielectric coolant) allowing higher heat transfer performance than air and many other benefits. Immersion
cooling can be up to 95% more efficient than standard air cooling, producing an estimated PUE (power usage effectiveness) of 1.05. This
cooler environment has been shown to extend machine lives by 30% or longer.
We initially decided to locate our initial
facilities in Trinidad, because it has some of the cheapest electricity in the world due to its abundant supplies of oil and gas and
because some of our technical staff is located there. We have entered into an agreement with Telecommunications Services of Trinidad
& Tobago Limited (“TSTT”), the largest and oldest telecom company in Trinidad, to co-locate up to 125 800 kw containers
for hosting digital asset miners. TSTT has up to 93 potential locations for co-location of our containers. Under the agreement, we have
the option, but not obligation, to co-locate containers at our own pace. We pay a fixed amount per container, plus the actual electricity
costs incurred by our containers in the amount billed to TSTT by the local utility without any markup. The agreement provides that our
hosting containers will be billed for electricity usage at the local utility’s standard rates, which is the greater of 3.5 cents
per kwh or 75% of the declared reserve capacity, which is equal to the customer’s highest expected monthly kilovolt-ampere demand
at $7.40. The term of the agreement expires on October 14, 2031. We have the right to terminate our agreement with TSTT at any time
that the price for electricity consumption exceeds $0.05 per kwh.
Until our permanent hosting facilities are operational,
we are temporarily leasing space for a small number of ASIC computers with a co-host. We intend to move all of our currently owned and
customer owned miners to our new TSTT hosting facilities once they are operational.
In October 2022, we completed the installation
of initial hosting containers under our agreement with TSTT. However, prior to commencing operations, TSTT advised us that the utility
had refused to honor its existing agreement with TSTT with respect to electricity supplied to our pilot hosting site, and instead indicated
that the rate would be approximately $0.09 per kwh. TSTT has informed us that it does not believe that its contract with the local utility
entitles it to vary the rate it charges for the use of electricity and has protested the decision. At this time, we are unable to predict
how this dispute between TSTT and the utility will be resolved, what form any resolution may take or how long any resolution may take.
Accordingly, we are delaying the installation of additional containers in Trinidad until this dispute is resolved. Until the dispute
between TSTT and the utility is resolved, we intend to focus our efforts on purchasing or developing hosting locations in the United
States and Canada, either directly or in joint ventures with other industry participants.
In light of the recent developments in Trinidad,
we are focusing our efforts in the near term on developing hosting locations in the United States and Canada. We are exploring situations
where medium to long-term power agreements may be available at affordable prices, whether using traditional power sources such as coal
or natural gas, as well as environmentally friendly sources such as hydroelectric, wind and solar-backed projects, which might allow
us to generate collateral revenue from the sale of excess power to the local utility grid and from the generation of saleable carbon
credits.
We recently entered into a joint arrangement
whereby we would contributed one immersion contain and six transformers, and sold four immersion containers to a joint venture with a
third party that has procured a location and a medium or long-term power purchase agreement in Pecos, Texas.
Our digital asset mining operation is focused
on the generation of digital assets by solving complex cryptographic algorithms to validate transactions on specific digital asset network
blockchains, which is commonly referred to as “mining.” Mining requires the use of specialized
computers equipped with application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chips (known as “miners”) to solve complex cryptographic
algorithms in support of the Bitcoin blockchain (in a process known as “solving a block”) in exchange for digital asset rewards
(primarily bitcoin). Whether we are hosting our client’s computers or mining for our own account with our own computers, the miners
participate in “mining pools” organized by “mining pool operators” in which we or our clients share mining power
(known as “hash rate”) with the hash rate generated by other miners participating in the pool to earn digital asset rewards.
The mining pool operator provides a service that coordinates the computing power of the independent mining enterprises participating in
the mining pool. Fees are paid to the mining pool operator to cover the costs of maintaining the pool. The pool uses software that coordinates
the pool members’ mining power, identifies new block rewards, records how much hash rate each participant contributes to the pool,
and assigns digital asset rewards earned by the pool among its participants in proportion to the hash rate each participant contributed
to the pool in connection with solving a block.
Our digital asset self-mining activity competes
with a myriad of mining operations throughout the world to complete new blocks in the blockchain and earn the reward in the form of an
established unit of a digital asset. Revenue from digital asset mining and hosting third party digital
asset miners are impacted by volatility in bitcoin prices, as well as increases in the Bitcoin blockchain’s network hash rate resulting
from the growth in the overall quantity and quality of miners working to solve blocks on the Bitcoin blockchain and the difficulty index
associated with the secure hashing algorithm employed in solving the blocks. Gross profits from digital asset mining are primarily
impacted by the cost of electricity to operate the miners and to a lesser extent by other operating costs. While we expect to sell
or exchange a portion of the digital assets we mine to fund our growth strategies or for general corporate purposes, we may hold our digital
assets as investments in anticipation of continued adoption of digital assets as a “store of value” and a more efficient medium
of exchange than traditional fiat currencies.
As the demand for digital assets increases and
digital assets become more widely accepted, there is an increasing demand for professional-grade, scalable infrastructure to support growth
of the blockchain ecosystem. We expect to continually evaluate the performance of our data centers, including our ability to access additional
megawatts of electric power and to expand our total self-mining and customer and related party hosting hash rates.
We also generate revenues from the advantageous
purchase and sale of equipment used for digital asset mining and hosting. We have relationships with some suppliers that enable us to
acquire highly desired equipment at attractive prices, which we plan to resell to third parties. In most cases, resales of digital asset
mining equipment would be to our hosting customers, which have the dual benefit of generating short-term gross profits from the equipment
sale as well as growing the customer base of our hosting business. We have recently resold some hosting equipment in Trinidad to third
parties that we determined would not be need in the short-term due to the dispute between TSTT and the local utility described above.
The primary factors that will impact future
hosting revenues include: (i) the price of bitcoin, since hosting revenues are primarily a percentage of bitcoin mined by clients; (ii)
the completion of operational hosting facilities, as potential hosting clients have been reluctant to sign contracts prior to the date
the Company has a fully operational hosting facility; and (iii) the availability of attractive electricity prices, since power usage is
the primary marginal cost for any mining operation. Our hosting revenues will also be impacted by the resolution of the dispute between
TSTT and the local utility regarding the electricity rate that will be charged our co-location facilities in Trinidad, as well as by the
timing of the resolution.
The primary factors that will impact proprietary
mining revenues include: (i) the price of bitcoin; (ii) the completion of operational facilities to provide us with a cost-effective facility
to operate in; (iii) the availability of attractive electricity prices, since power usage is the primary marginal cost for any mining
operation; and (iv) the availability of mining equipment suitable for the Company’s immersion hosting environment at attractive
prices and available capacity in the Company’s hosting facilities. Our proprietary mining activities will also be impacted by the
resolution of the dispute between TSTT and the local utility regarding the electricity rate that will be charged our co-location facilities
in Trinidad, as well as by the timing of the resolution.
Revenues from cryptocurrency mining, whether
derived from hosting clients or from proprietary mining, are impacted significantly by volatility in Bitcoin prices, as well as increases
in the Bitcoin blockchain’s network hash rate resulting from the growth in the overall quantity and quality of miners working to
solve blocks on the Bitcoin blockchain and the difficulty index associated with the secure hashing algorithm employed in solving the blocks.
From early May 2021 to May 2022, the Bitcoin network hash rate increased by approximately 36% as a result of, among other factors, the
increased number of miners working to solve blocks on the Bitcoin blockchain during that period, many of which make use of newer, more
efficient ASIC chips that are specially designed to solve blocks using the SHA-256 set of cryptographic hash functions employed on the
Bitcoin blockchain. For three months ended May 31, 2021 and 2022, the average network hash rate working on the Bitcoin blockchain was
161,245,123 EH/s and 218,665,650 EH/s, respectively. Further, the difficulty index increased over 24% in the last year. The market price
of Bitcoin fell from $44,355 as of March 1, 2022 to $31,792 on May 31, 2022.
The primary factors that will impact resales
of mining equipment include the availability of equipment at attractive prices and the number of participants willing to enter the mining
business or expand their existing operations, which is highly correlated to the margin from mining, as determined by the market price
of bitcoin and prevailing energy costs. Also, our resales of mining equipment will be impacted by the existence of hosting capacity with
attractive electricity rates in our hosting operations.
Results of Operations
Comparison of Results of Operations for Years
Ended August 31, 2021 and 2020.
Revenues
The Company did not generate any revenues during
the years ended August 31, 2021 or 2020. The Company does not believe that revenues in the 2021 fiscal year are reflective of future
revenues, as the Company was not in business until July 2021, when it entered the businesses of hosting third-party miners, mining
bitcoin for its own account, and sales of related equipment to industry participants. However, it was not able to commence revenue generating
activities by August 31, 2022. Future revenues are expected to include revenue from the sale of mining equipment at a markup, revenues
from hosting miners, and revenues from mining bitcoin for our own account.
Operating Expenses
During the year ended August 31, 2021 the Company
incurred $131,815 in operating expenses compared to $0 in operating expense during the prior year ended August 31, 2020. Operating
expenses for the 2021 fiscal year were primarily comprised of $71,250 in stock-based compensation expense to certain directors and consultants
for services, legal and accounting fees, Delaware taxes and other fees associated with being a public company. The higher level of
operating expenses in fiscal 2021 as compared to fiscal 2020 is attributable to expenses incurred to as part of the Company’s entry
into the digital asset hosting business. The Company expects that operating expenses will be trend materially higher in future periods
as the Company begins paying regular compensation to existing officers and directors, hires additional employees, and incurs other costs
associated with the commencement of operations.
Other Income (Expense)
During the year ended August 31, 2021 the Company
incurred $22,424 in other expenses, as compared to $1,558 of other expenses during the prior year ended August 31, 2020. In each year,
other expenses consisted of interest accrued on loans made to the Company be entities affiliated with management. The higher level
of interest expense in fiscal 2021 as compared to fiscal 2020 is attributable to higher loan balances in 2021 as the Company borrowed
money to finance its entry into the digital asset hosting business.
Net Income (Loss)
During the year ended August 31, 2021 the Company
incurred a net loss of ($154,239), or ($0.02) per share, as compared to a net of loss of ($1,558) during the prior year ended August 31,
2020. The increase in the Company’s net loss in fiscal 2021 as compared to fiscal 2020 is attributable to the factors discussed
above.
Comparison of Results of Operations for
the Three Months Ended May 31, 2022, and 2021.
Revenues
During the three months ended May 31, 2022,
the Company generated $16,567 in Bitcoin revenue from hosting third-party miners, compared to $0 revenue in the corresponding period.
Revenues during the three months ended May 31, 2022 were adversely impacted by the Company’s decision not to charge its hosting
client for electricity usage as an accommodation due to delays in completing the permanent facility at which its machines were to be hosted,
as described below. The Company had no operations in the three months ended May 31, 2021, prior to launching its Bitcoin hosting and mining
business in July 2021. The Company signed its first hosting client in February 2022 under a three year contract to host 215 miners. The
Company had deployed 103 of the client’s machines as of May 31, 2022 while the Company completed work on permanent facilities. The
Company could not deploy the balance of the machines because the temporary facility did not have the capacity and because the hosting
environment was not suitable for some machines. The Company originally expected to deploy all of client’s machines by April 2022,
but was delayed due to production delays by the Company’s vendor of immersion containers, delays in site preparation in Trinidad,
and the delayed availability of certain electrical equipment in Trinidad. The Company completed its first hosting facility in Trinidad
in October 2022, but has delayed opening the facility pending resulting of a dispute between our co-location partner in Trinidad and the
electricity company in Trinidad over the price that will be charged for electricity provided to your hosting operations. At this time,
we do not have an information on when the dispute will be resolved and in what manner. As a consequence, we are currently focusing our
efforts on the development of hosting centers in the United States and Canada, both directly and in joint ventures with third parties.
During the three months ended May 31, 2022,
the Company did not generate any revenues from self-mining digital assets or from equipment sales.
The Company expects hosting revenues in future
periods to be lower as a result of our decision to focus on self-mining over hosting third party miners. In the current market environment,
the price of ASIC miners has fallen to the point that we believe self-mining is more profitable than hosting third party miners. The Company
currently owns 362 miners that it plans to use for proprietary mining, the deployment of which will occur when its immersion hosting environment
is operational. The Company also expects to generate additional revenues from the resale of certain hosting agreement, primarily containers
and transformers. Since May 31, 2022, the Company has sold two hosting containers to a third party, and has sold or contributed five hosting
containers and six transformers to a joint venture that is constructing a hosting facility in Texas. In addition, the Company is seeing
good opportunities to acquire mining equipment at attractive prices, which should create opportunities for additional revenues.
The primary factors that will impact our revenues
in prior periods are described in the “—Overview” above.
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales related to Bitcoin mining revenue
was $99,711 for the three months ended May 31, 2022, compared to zero in the prior period when there was no revenue. Cost of sales normally
includes electricity, utilities, facilities costs, depreciation and supplies. For the three months ended May 31, 2022, major components
of cost of sales included freight costs, value added tax, rent to house mining and hosting equipment, electricity, and supplies. The Company
believes that cost of sales as a percentage of revenues were greater in the three months ended May 31, 2022 than what it expects to incur
in future periods. Cost of sales in the three months ended May 31, 2022 were inflated by costs associated with maintaining temporary hosting
facilities while our permanent hosting facility was being completed, and costs associated with the setup of temporary hosting facilities
and the completion of our new hosting facility that we determined not to capitalize. Furthermore, we provided temporary hosting facilities
to your initial hosting client which carried electricity costs that were materially higher than the costs that we expect to incur in our
permanent facilities.
Since we are in the early stages of setting
up our infrastructure to generate higher levels of revenues, we expect that our cost of sales to generate asset revenue from hosting
or mining for our own account will exceed the revenue we generate until we achieve sufficient economies of scale by deploying more miners.
In future periods, the largest component of our cost of sales will consist of electricity costs, which will increase substantially as
our hosting facilities are fully utilized. However, hosting clients will be responsible for reimbursing their pro rata share of electricity
costs. The balance of the electricity costs attributable to our proprietary mining operations will be paid for by bitcoin revenues generated
from those operations.
Operating Expenses
During the three months ended May 31, 2022, the
Company incurred $329,964 in operating expenses compared to $13,555 in operating expenses during the three months ended May 31, 2021.
Operating expenses for the 2022 period were primarily comprised of $141,312 in general and administrative expenses, $75,705 in legal and
accounting fees, and $109,172 in related party compensation expense to three of our officers. Included in the $329,964 in operating expenses
is $134,344 in non-cash expenses due to the issuance of common stock for services and to related parties as compensation pursuant to the
terms of an employment agreement. Additionally, we incurred $3,775 in impairment expenses on our cryptocurrency holdings due to the significant
decline in the price of Bitcoin we are holding. The higher level of operating expenses in the 2022 period as compared to the 2021 period
is attributable to expenses incurred as part of the Company’s entry into the bitmine hosting business. The Company expects that
operating expenses will trend materially higher in future periods as the Company begins paying regular compensation to existing officers
and directors, hires additional employees, and incurs other costs associated with the commencement of operations.
Other Income (Expense)
During the three months ended May 31, 2022, the
Company incurred $73,805 in other expenses, which was comprised of interest expense of $78,290 and interest income of $4,485, compared
to $6,386 of interest expenses during the same three months ended May 31, 2021. The increase in interest expense is due to increased
levels of borrowings by the Company under its line of credit in 2022 compared to the 2021 period when no line of credit was available.
Net Income (Loss)
As a result of the foregoing, during the three
months ended May 31, 2022, the Company incurred a net loss of ($486,912), or ($0.01) per share, as compared to a net loss of ($19,941)
or $(0.01) per share during the three months ended May 31, 2021. The increase in the Company’s net loss in the three months ended
May 31, 2022, compared to the three months ended May 31, 2021, is attributable to the factors discussed above.
Comparison of Results of Operations for
the Nine Months Ended May 31, 2022, and 2021.
Revenues
During the nine months ended May 31, 2022,
the Company generated $16,567 in Bitcoin revenue from hosting third-party miners compared to $0 during the period ended May 31, 2021.
Revenues during the three months ended May 31, 2022 were adversely impacted by the Company’s decision not to charge its hosting
client for electricity usage as an accommodation due to delays in completing the permanent facility at which its machines were to be
hosted, as described below. The Company had no operations in the nine months ended May 31, 2021, prior to launching its hosting and mining
business in July 2021. The Company signed its first hosting client in February 2022 under a three year contract to host 215 miners. The
Company had deployed 103 of the client’s machines in temporary facilities as of May 31, 2022 while the Company completed work on
permanent facilities. The Company could not deploy the balance of the machines because the temporary facility did not have the capacity
and because the hosting environment was not suitable for some machines. The Company originally expected to deploy all of client’s
machines by April 2022, but was delayed due to production delays by the Company’s vendor of immersion containers, delays in site
preparation in Trinidad, and the delayed availability of certain electrical equipment in Trinidad. The Company completed its first hosting
facility in Trinidad in October 2022, but has delayed opening the facility pending resulting of a dispute between our co-location partner
in Trinidad and the electricity company in Trinidad over the price that will be charged for electricity provided to your hosting operations.
At this time, we do not have an information on when the dispute will be resolved and in what manner. As a consequence, we are currently
focusing our efforts on the development of hosting centers in the United States and Canada, both directly and as joint ventures with
third parties.
During the nine months ended May 31, 2022, the
Company generated $4,574 in revenues from self-mining digital assets. The revenues were generated when the Company tested temporary facilities
in Trinidad to host equipment from our initial hosting customer and ended when the equipment was sold to our first hosting customer, effective
March 1, 2022.
During the nine months ended May 31, 2022, the
Company recorded revenue on the sale of mining equipment of $344,700. The units sold were non-customized 72 Antminer T-17's and 25 Whatsminer
M31S with an aggregate cost basis of $186,657. The gross profit on the sale of these units was calculated but subtracting the cost of
the units from the sales proceeds, less accrued depreciation of the equipment. There were no capitalized costs added to the cost of the
units. The terms of the sale were a cash payment of $168,750 and the execution of a note by the purchaser for $168,750, payable with interest
at 10% in two installments, one in the amount of $84,375 due on April 15, 2022 and a second installment of $84,375 in principal and all
accrued interest due on May 15, 2022. The Company later agreed to extend the dates of both payments to June 15, 2022 and July 15, 2022,
respectively, as an accommodation to the customer for delays in completing the hosting facility that they will be permanently hosted in.
The Company expects hosting revenues in future
periods to be lower as a result of our decision to focus on self-mining over hosting third party miners. In the current market environment,
the price of ASIC miners has fallen to the point that we believe self-mining is more profitable than hosting third party miners. The Company
currently owns 362 miners that it plans to use for proprietary mining, the deployment of which will occur when its immersion hosting environment
is operational. The Company also expects to generate additional revenues from the resale of certain hosting agreement, primarily containers
and transformers. Since May 31, 2022, the Company has sold two hosting containers to a third party, and has sold or contributed five hosting
containers and six transformers to a joint venture that is constructing a hosting facility in Texas. In addition, the Company is seeing
good opportunities to acquire mining equipment at attractive prices, which should create opportunities for additional revenues.
The primary factors that will impact our revenues
in prior periods are described in the “—Overview” above.
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales related to Bitcoin hosting and
mining revenue was $145,179 for the nine months ended May 31, 2022, compared to zero in the prior period when there was no revenue. Cost
of sales normally includes electricity, utilities, facilities costs, depreciation and supplies. For the nine months ended May 31, 2022,
major components of cost of sales included freight costs, value added tax, rent to house mining and hosting equipment, electricity, and
supplies. The Company believes that cost of sales as a percentage of revenues were greater in the nine months ended May 31, 2022 than
what it expects to incur in future periods. Cost of sales in the three months ended May 31, 2022 were inflated by costs associated with
maintaining temporary hosting facilities while our permanent hosting facility was being completed, and costs associated with the setup
of temporary hosting facilities and the completion of our new hosting facility that we determined not to capitalize. Furthermore, we provided
temporary hosting facilities to your initial hosting client which carried electricity costs that were materially higher than the costs
that we expect to incur in our permanent facilities.
Cost of sales related to the sale of mining
equipment was $186,657, which resulted in a gross profit of $158,043 from the sale of mining equipment during the nine months ended May
31, 2022, compared to zero in the nine months ended May 31, 2021.
Since we are in the early stages of setting
up our infrastructure to generate higher levels of revenues, we expect that our cost of sales to generate revenue from hosting or mining
for our own account will exceed the revenue we generate until we achieve sufficient economies of scale by deploying more miners. In future
periods, the largest component of our cost of sales will consist of electricity costs, which will increase substantially as our hosting
facilities are fully utilized. However, hosting clients will be responsible for reimbursing their pro rata share of electricity costs.
The balance of the electricity costs attributable to our proprietary mining operations will be paid for by bitcoin revenues generated
from those operations.
Operating Expenses
During the nine months ended May 31, 2022, the
Company incurred $1,150,119 in operating expenses compared to $36,614 during the nine months ended May 31, 2021. Operating expenses for
the 2022 period were primarily comprised of $189,982 in general and administrative expenses, $742,730 in legal expenses, accounting,
investment banking, and professional fees, which includes $637,964 in non-cash stock-based compensation, and $213,633 in related party
compensation expense to three of our officers. Additionally, we incurred $3,775 in impairment expenses on our cryptocurrency holdings
due to the significant decline in the price of Bitcoin we are holding. The higher level of operating expenses in the 2022 period as
compared to the 2021 period is attributable to expenses incurred as part of the Company’s entry into the digital asset hosting
business. The Company expects that operating expenses will trend materially higher in future periods as the Company begins paying
regular compensation to existing officers and directors, hires additional employees, and incurs other costs associated with the commencement
of operations.
Other Income (Expense)
During the nine months ended May 31, 2022, the
Company incurred $191,680 in other expenses, which was comprised of $196,165 in interest expense, and $4,485 in interest income, compared
to $14,672 of interest expenses during the nine months ended May 31, 2021. The increase in interest expense is due to increased levels
of borrowings by the Company on its line of credit in 2022 compared to the 2021 period when no line of credit was available.
Net Income (Loss)
As a result of the foregoing, during the nine months
ended May 31, 2022, the Company incurred a net loss of ($1,307,795), or ($0.03) per share, as compared to a net loss of ($51,826), or
$(0.02) during the nine months ended May 31, 2021. The increase in the Company’s net loss in the nine months ended May 31, 2022,
compared to the nine months ended May 31, 2021, is attributable to the factors discussed above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of May 31, 2022, the Company had $499,912 in
cash on hand.
During the nine months ended May 31, 2022, the
Company had a net loss of ($1,307,795).
Cash flows used in operating activities were
($454,327) for the nine months ended May 31, 2022, compared to cash flows used of ($36,614) for the nine months ended May 31, 2021.
The increase in cash flows used in operating activities for fiscal 2022 compared to fiscal 2021 is primarily attributable to our operating
loss of ($1,307,795), which was offset by non-cash stock-based compensation of $565,460, an increase of $102,792 of accrued interest,
and the accrual of $102,792 of compensation to related parties during the nine months ended May 31, 2022, as well as minor changes in
other balance sheet accounts.
Cash flows used in investing activities were
($2,268,811) for the nine months ended May 31, 2022, compared to cash flows used in investing activities of $-0- for the nine months
ended May 31, 2021. The entire increase in cash flows used by investing activities during the 2022 period compared to the 2021 period
is due to the purchase of $2,268,811 in equipment, which consisted of mining cooling immersion containers, network equipment, electrical
power cables and boards, transformers and numerous antminers to be deployed to mine digital asset. In particular, during the nine months
ended May 31, 2022, we acquired ten immersion containers for $2,550,000 and six transformers for $294,000. During the nine months ended
May 31, 2022, we did not purchase any miners, but we sold 95 miners for $337,500 which were purchased in the prior year for an aggregate
price of $187,260.
Cash flows provided by financing activities were
$3,004,313 for the nine months ended May 31, 2022, compared to cash flows provided by financing activities of $38,150 for the nine months
ended May 31, 2021. The increase in cash flows provided by financing activities in the 2022 period compared to the 2021 period is attributable
to $1,616,813 in borrowings on our
Line of Credit Agreement (the “LOC Agreement”)
with Innovative Digital Investors Emerging Technology, L.P. (“IDI”), a limited partnership controlled by Jonathan Bates,
our Chairman, and Raymond Mow, our chief financial officer, and a director and $1,387,500 in proceeds from the Unit offering in 2022.
Through August 31, 2022, a significant component
of the Company’s current liquidity has been derived from the LOC Agreement with IDI. The LOC Agreement was initially entered into
on July 22, 2021, and was amended and restated in its entirety on August 4, 2021, September 29, 2021, March 30, 2022 and June 24, 2022.
On August 31, 2022, the Company and IDI agreed to convert all amounts then due under the LOC Agreement into shares of Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock with a stated value equal to the principal and interest due under the LOC Agreement, which resulted in the issuance of
303,966 shares of Series A Preferred Stock for $3,309,662 due thereunder.
On October 19, 2022, the Company entered into
a new Line of Credit Agreement with IDI (the “2022 LOC Agreement”), under which the Company has the right to borrow up to
$1,000,000 to finance the purchase of equipment necessary for the operation of the Company’s business, and related working capital.
Loans under the 2022 LOC Agreement accrue interest at twelve percent (12%) per annum, compounded on a 30/360 monthly basis until the loans
have been repaid in full. The Company has the right to submit draw requests under the 2022 LOC Agreement until April 15, 2023. Each draw
request is subject to the approval of IDI in its sole discretion. The amount drawn, plus all accrued interest therein, is repayable in
full on December 1, 2023.
The Company believes that cash on hand, amounts
that may borrow under the 2022 LOC Agreement, and expected receipts from sale transactions will provide it with sufficient liquidity
to fund its operations for the next 12 months. The Company expects to receive approximately $41,000 from the sale of two immersion containers
in August 2022, and approximately $31,000 per month from the sale of four immersion containers to a joint venture in which the company
will be both lender to and equity investor. Currently, the Company owns 362 miners which it plans to use for self-mining. Assuming neither
the price of bitcoin nor the difficulty index changes, and based on the Company’s expected electricity costs, the Company estimates
that it could generate approximately $19,500 in monthly gross profit from the miners once they are moved to a permanent location in Trinidad.
Other sources of revenue that the Company expects to receive include equity distributions from the ROC Digital joint venture once it
becomes operational in late 2022. The Company does not budget to include any proceeds from the exercise of its outstanding warrants because it
is not able to predict when or if the market price of its common stock will exceed the exercise price of its warrants.
Nevertheless, while the Company does not need
additional capital to maintain operations, it will need additional capital to expand its digital asset hosting and mining business, and
take advantage of opportunities in the market place that currently exist due to the recent decline in digital asset prices. Therefore,
the Company has engaged an investment banker and is pursuing additional capital-raising alternatives, including the potential issuance
of common stock in a private placement, or the issuance of convertible notes or preferred stock. There is no assurance that the Company
will be able to raise additional capital or that the terms of any capital raise are not dilutive to current shareholders or carry other
terms that are unfavorable to the Company and its shareholders.
Bitcoin Holdings
At May 31, 2022, we held approximately 0.665
Bitcoin with a total carrying value of $17,366 on the balance sheet. All of the Bitcoin were classified as “Digital currencies”
on the balance sheet. The fair market value of our Bitcoin holdings at May 31, 2022 was approximately $17,366 and the value of a single
bitcoin was approximately $31,798.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company does not have any off-balance sheet
arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on the Company’s financial condition,
changes in financial condition, and results of operations, liquidity or capital resources.
Related Party Transactions
Starting in 2020, Coral Investment Partners, LP,
a partnership controlled by Erik Nelson, agreed to make loans to the Company from time to time pursuant to a demand promissory note that
bore interest at 24% per annum. The amount due at August 31, 2020 was principal of $50,447 and interest of $1,558. The amount due of
principal of $87,447 and interest of $19,476. Was repaid in full in the quarter ended August 31, 2021.
On July 22, 2021, the Company entered into
a LOC Agreement with Innovative Digital Investors Emerging Technology, L.P., a limited partnership controlled by Jonathan Bates, our
Chairman, and Raymond Mow, our chief financial officer and a director. The LOC Agreement was amended and restated in its entirety on
August 4, 2021, September 29, 2021, March 30, 2022 and June 24, 2022 (as amended and restated, the “LOC Agreement”). On August
31, 2022, the Company and IDI agreed to convert all amounts then due under the LOC Agreement into shares of Series A Convertible Preferred
Stock with a stated value equal to the principal and interest due under the LOC Agreement, which resulted in the issuance of 303,966
shares of Series A Preferred Stock for $3,039,662 due thereunder.
On October 19, 2022, the
Company entered into a new Line of Credit Agreement (the “2022 LOC Agreement”) with IDI. The 2022 LOC Agreement provides
for loans of up to $1,000,000 at the request of the Company to finance the purchase of equipment necessary for the operation of the Company’s
business, and related working capital. Loans under the 2022 LOC Agreement accrue interest at twelve percent (12%) per annum, compounded
on a 30/360 monthly basis until the loans have been repaid in full. The Company has the right to submit draw requests under the 2022
LOC Agreement until April 15, 2023. Each draw request is subject to the approval of IDI in its sole discretion. The amount drawn, plus
all accrued interest therein, is repayable in full on December 1, 2023. As of November 4, 2022, the amount advanced under the 2022 LOC
Agreement was $400,000.
Critical Accounting Policies
General
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations is based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. The preparation of our financial statements requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments
that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, net sales and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.
Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not
readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We describe in this section certain critical accounting
policies that require us to make significant estimates, assumptions and judgments. An accounting policy is deemed to be critical if it
requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are uncertain at the time the estimate is made and
if different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur
periodically, could materially impact the financial statements. Management believes the following critical accounting policies reflect
its most significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the financial statements. For further information on the critical
accounting policies, see Note 1 of the Financial Statements.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”),
which is the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation
of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements
in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. The most significant estimates relate to the
calculation of stock-based compensation, useful lives and recoverability of long-lived assets, income taxes and contingencies. The
Company bases its estimates on historical experience, known or expected trends, and various other assumptions that are believed to be
reasonable given the quality of information available as of the date of these financial statements. The results of these assumptions
provide the basis for making estimates about the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
sources. Actual results could differ from these estimates. There have been no material changes to the Company’s accounting estimates
since the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2021.
Revenue Recognition
On July 1, 2018, the Company adopted Accounting
Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). Results for reporting
periods beginning after January 1, 2018, are presented under ASC 606.
Revenues from digital currency mining –
General
The Company
recognizes revenue under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The core principle of the revenue standard is that a
company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration
to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The following five steps are applied to achieve that
core principle:
· Step
1: Identify the contract with the customer;
· Step
2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract;
· Step
3: Determine the transaction price;
· Step
4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and
· Step
5: Recognize revenue when the Company satisfies a performance obligation.
In order
to identify the performance obligations in a contract with a customer, a company must assess
the promised goods or services in the contract and identify each promised good or service that is distinct. A performance obligation meets
ASC 606’s definition of a “distinct” good or service (or bundle of goods or services) if both of the following criteria
are met: The customer can benefit from the good or service either on its own or together with other resources that are readily available
to the customer (i.e., the good or service is capable of being distinct), and the entity’s promise to transfer the good or service
to the customer is separately identifiable from other promises in the contract (i.e., the promise to transfer the good or service is distinct
within the context of the contract).
If a good
or service is not distinct, the good or service is combined with other promised goods or
services until a bundle of goods or services is identified that is distinct.
The transaction
price is the amount of consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods or services
to a customer. The consideration promised in a contract with a customer may include fixed amounts, variable amounts, or both. When determining
the transaction price, an entity must consider the effects of all of the following:
|
• |
Variable consideration |
|
• |
Constraining estimates of variable consideration |
|
• |
The existence of a significant financing component in the contract |
|
• |
Noncash consideration |
|
• |
Consideration payable to a customer |
Variable
consideration is included in the transaction price only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of
cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved.
The transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation on a relative standalone selling price basis. The transaction price
allocated to each performance obligation is recognized when that performance obligation is satisfied, at a point in time or over time
as appropriate.
The Company
has entered into digital asset mining pools by executing contracts, as amended from time to time, with the mining pool operators to
provide computing power to the mining pool. The contracts are terminable at any time by either party
and the Company’s enforceable right to compensation only begins when the Company provides computing power to the mining pool operator.
In exchange for providing computing power, the Company is entitled to a fractional share of the fixed cryptocurrency award the mining
pool operator receives (less digital asset transaction fees to the mining pool operator which are immaterial and are recorded as a deduction
from revenue), for successfully adding a block to the blockchain. The terms of the agreement provide that neither party can dispute settlement
terms after thirty-five days following settlement. The Company’s fractional share is based on the proportion of computing power
the Company contributed to the mining pool operator to the total computing power contributed by all mining pool participants in solving
the current algorithm.
Providing
computing power to solve complex cryptographic algorithms in support of the Bitcoin blockchain (in a process known as “solving a
block”) is an output of the Company’s ordinary activities. The provision of providing such computing power is the only performance
obligation in the Company’s contracts with mining pool operators. The transaction consideration the Company receives, if any, is
noncash consideration, which the Company measures at fair value on the date received, which is not materially different than the fair
value at contract inception or the time the Company has earned the award from the pools. The consideration is all variable. Because it
is not probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue will not occur, the consideration is constrained until the mining pool
operator successfully places a block (by being the first to solve an algorithm) and the Company receives confirmation of the consideration
it will receive, at which time revenue is recognized. There is no significant financing component in these transactions.
Fair value
of the cryptocurrency award received is determined using the market rate of the related cryptocurrency at the time of receipt.
Revenues from Hosting
The Company
provides energized space to customers who locate their equipment within the Company’s co-hosting facility. The equipment generating
the hosting revenue is owned by the customer. Currently, the Company accepts the mining proceeds daily from the mining pool into a cold
wallet address in the Company’s name. The Company sends its hosting client its portion daily, as the Company receives such proceeds.
All performance obligations are achieved simultaneously by providing the hosting environment for the customers’ operations.
Hosting revenues consist of amounts billed in U.S. dollars for electricity and other fees, and a percentage of cryptocurrency generated
by the client’s hosting activities. With regard to hosting revenues that are billed in U.S. dollars, revenues are recorded at the
time of invoicing. With regard to hosting revenues that are based on a percentage of cryptocurrency generated by the customer, revenues
are recorded based on the Company’s share of cryptocurrency received from the mining pool on the date of receipt.
During
the period ending May 31, 2022, all of the Company’s hosting revenue was derived from one hosting customer.
Revenues
from the sale of mining equipment
The Company
records revenue from the resale of mining equipment it has purchased. Revenue for the sale of mining equipment is recognized under the
guidelines of ASC 606.
Revenues
From Mining
Revenues
from mining cryptocurrency for its own account will be recorded at the spot price for the cryptocurrency on a daily basis based on the
Company’s proportionate share of cryptocurrency earned by the mining pools in which the Company participates on the date the Company
receives its share from the pool.
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid temporary
cash investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. On August 31, 2021, and August 31, 2020, the
Company’s cash equivalents totaled $218,737 and $1,930, respectively.
Cryptocurrency
Cryptocurrencies held are accounted for as intangible
assets with indefinite useful lives. An intangible asset with an indefinite useful life is not amortized but assessed for impairment quarterly,
when events or changes in circumstances occur indicating that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived asset is impaired.
Impairment exists when the carrying amount exceeds its fair value, which is measured using the quoted price of the cryptocurrency at
the time its fair value is being measured. In testing for impairment, the Company has the option to first perform a qualitative assessment
to determine whether it is more likely than not that an impairment exists. If it is determined that it is not more likely than not that
an impairment exists, a quantitative impairment test is not necessary. If the Company concludes otherwise, it is required to perform a
quantitative impairment test. To the extent an impairment loss is recognized, the loss establishes the new cost basis of the asset. During
the three months ended May 31, 2022, the company recorded an impairment charge of $3,775 due to a reduction in the quoted price of cryptocurrency.
Subsequent reversal of impairment losses, if the price of cryptocurrency increases is not permitted.
Cryptocurrency earned by the Company through
its mining activities are included within operating activities on the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows. The sales of
digital currencies are included within investing activities in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows and any realized
gains or losses from such sales are included in other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive
income (loss). The Company accounts for its gains or losses in accordance with the first in first out (“FIFO”) method of accounting.
The Company
holds its cryptocurrencies in a cold storage wallet account in its name, and not with a custodian or other intermediary. The Company has
an account with Gemini Trust Company, LLC, which is a qualified custodian regulated by the New York Department of Financial Services.
Currently, the Company does not store cryptocurrencies at Gemini, and only transfers cryptocurrencies that it desires to liquidate to
its account at Gemini immediately prior to the liquidation. The Company uses Gemini’s
multi-signature feature for account access.
Stock-based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation
using the fair value method following the guidance outlined in Section 718-10 of the FASB ASC for disclosure about stock-based compensation.
This section requires a public entity to measure the cost of employee and non-employee services received in exchange for an award of equity
instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). That cost will be recognized over the period during
which service is provided. No compensation cost is recognized for equity instruments for which service is not provided or rendered.
Related party transactions
The Company follows ASC 850, Related Party
Disclosures, for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions. In accordance with ASC 850, the Company’s
financial statements include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances,
and other similar items in the ordinary course of business, as well as transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of financial
statements.
Net Loss per Share
Net loss per common share is computed by dividing
net loss by the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period as defined by ASC Topic 260, “Earnings per Share.”
Basic earnings per common share calculations are determined by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of
common stock outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per common share calculations are determined by dividing net income (loss)
by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common share equivalents outstanding. As of August 31, 2021 there were no
common stock equivalents that were dilutive.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are provided for the tax effects of
transactions reported in the financial statements and consist of taxes currently due plus deferred taxes related primarily to differences
between depreciation which is deductible for tax purposes prior to being deductible for book purposes. The deferred tax assets and liabilities
represent the future tax return consequences of those differences, which will either be taxable or deductible when the assets and liabilities
are recovered or settled. Deferred taxes also are recognized for operating losses that are available to offset future taxable income.
From time to time, the Company may have differences
in computing the book and tax bases of property and equipment; reserves for bad debts; capitalized overhead included in inventories; bonus
plan payables, and accrued wages to shareholders/employees. Deferred tax expense or benefit is the result of the changes in the deferred
tax assets, net of the valuation reserve, and liabilities.
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance
with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 740 (“FASB ASC 740”), Income Taxes, which
clarifies the accounting and disclosure requirements for uncertainty in tax positions. It requires a two-step approach to evaluate tax
positions and determine if they should be recognized in the financial statements. The two-step approach involves recognizing any tax positions
that are “more likely than not” to occur and then measuring those positions to determine if they are recognizable in the financial
statements. Management regularly reviews and analyzes all tax positions and has determined that no uncertain tax positions requiring recognition
have occurred.
In general, the Company’s income tax returns
are subject to examination by the taxing authorities for three years after they were filed. The Company has not filed any tax returns.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
All other newly issued accounting pronouncements,
but not yet effective, have been deemed either immaterial or not applicable.
BUSINESS
Company Overview
We are a blockchain technology company that is
building out industrial scale digital asset mining, equipment sales and hosting operations. We expect to operate in two principal business
segments: “mining” consisting of digital asset mining for our own account, and “hosting”
consisting of providing and maintaining the infrastructure to host the equipment of third-parties who mine digital assets for their own
account. Our state-of-the-art facilities will be specifically designed and constructed for housing advanced mining equipment.
Our data centers will provide power, racks, proprietary thermodynamic management (heat dissipation and airflow management), redundant
connectivity, 24/7 security, as well as software which provide infrastructure management and custom firmware that boost performance and
energy efficiency. We also operate in a third line of business, which is the purchase and sale of hosting and digital asset mining equipment
to third parties, including customers of our hosting business.
Our digital asset mining operation is focused
on the generation of digital assets by solving complex cryptographic algorithms to validate transactions on specific digital asset network
blockchains, which is commonly referred to as “mining.” Our digital asset self-mining activity competes with a myriad of mining
operations throughout the world to complete new blocks in the blockchain and earn the reward in the form of an established unit of a digital
asset. While we expect to sell or exchange a portion of the digital assets we mine to fund our growth strategies or for general corporate
purposes, we may hold our digital assets as investments in anticipation of continued adoption of digital assets as a “store of value”
and a more efficient medium of exchange than traditional fiat currencies.
As the demand for digital assets increases and
digital assets become more widely accepted, there is an increasing demand for professional-grade, scalable infrastructure to support growth
of the blockchain ecosystem. We expect to continually evaluate the performance of our data centers, including our ability to access additional
megawatts of electric power and to expand our total self-mining and customer and related party hosting hash rates.
We primarily plan to operate our data centers
using immersion cooling technology, although we operate some air-cooled centers for equipment that is not suitable for immersion cooling.
Immersion cooling is the process of submerging computer components (or full servers) in a thermally, but not electrically, conductive
liquid (dielectric coolant) allowing higher heat transfer performance than air and many other benefits. Immersion cooling can be up to
95% more efficient than standard air cooling, producing an estimated PUE (power usage effectiveness) of 1.05. This cooler environment
has been shown to extend machine lives by 30% or longer.
Revenue Sources
Our revenue will consist primarily of fees
generated from our hosting operations, sales of mining equipment to be hosted in our data centers and proceeds related to Bitcoin transaction
processing for our own account.
|
• |
Hosting
revenue from customers and related parties. Hosting revenue from customers and related parties is based on
consumption-based contracts with our customers and related parties. Most contracts are renewable, and our customers are generally
billed on a fixed and recurring basis each month for the duration of their contract, which vary from one to three years in
length. Our typical agreement provides for full reimbursement of the client’s share of electricity costs of the
hosting facility, and a percentage of bitcoin generated by the client’s activities. The percentage is negotiable on
a case-by-case basis but is expected to average 25% of revenues. In addition, we may earn minor services revenue from
equipment repairs and handling shipping logistics. We do not indemnify our hosting clients against loss. The agreements
are normally terminable in the event of a default by either party. The agreements are often subject to suspension in the
event force majeure events or when the prevailing gross margins on digital asset mining are not positive. In addition, some of our
agreements may allow a client to terminate the agreement in the event the price of electricity exceeds a certain benchmark, which is
negotiated on a case-by-case basis based on the location of the hosting facility. Our hosting customers may supply their own
equipment or may purchase the equipment from us. |
|
|
|
|
• |
Digital asset mining income. We will conduct proprietary
digital asset mining operations using specialized computers equipped with application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chips (known
as “miners”) to solve complex cryptographic algorithms in support of the Bitcoin blockchain (in a process known as “solving
a block”) in exchange for digital asset rewards (primarily Bitcoin). The Company will participate in “mining pools”
organized by “mining pool operators” in which we share our mining power (known as “hash rate”) with the hash
rate generated by other miners participating in the pool to earn digital asset rewards. The mining pool operator provides a service that
coordinates the computing power of the independent mining enterprises participating in the mining pool. Fees are paid to the mining pool
operator to cover the costs of maintaining the pool. The pool uses software that coordinates the pool members’ mining power, identifies
new block rewards, records how much hash rate each participant contributes to the pool, and assigns digital asset rewards earned by the
pool among its participants in proportion to the hash rate each participant contributed to the pool in connection with solving a block.
Revenues from digital asset mining are impacted by volatility in Bitcoin prices, as well as increases in the Bitcoin blockchain’s
network hash rate resulting from the growth in the overall quantity and quality of miners working to solve blocks on the Bitcoin blockchain
and the difficulty index associated with the secure hashing algorithm employed in solving the blocks. |
|
|
|
|
• |
Equipment sales to customers and related parties. Equipment
sales to customers and related parties is derived from our ability to leverage our partnerships with leading equipment manufacturers
to secure equipment in advance, which is then sold to our customers and related parties. Our equipment sales are typically in connection
with a hosting contract, but have sold equipment to parties that are not hosting customers where the terms are attractive. |
We consider these all to be part of the same
line of business. We do not have any fixed goals regarding the percentage of our data centers that we use for hosting third party miners
versus the percentage that we use for self-mining. For mining or hosting equipment that we purchase, we also do not have any fixed goals
regarding whether we utilize the equipment for our own account, sell it to a customer or other third party or contribute it to a joint
venture. We let market conditions and overall profitability analysis guide the decisions. When we host, we look for opportunities to profitably
sell miners to the hosting client in a buy/host transaction. In some instances, we may resell data center and electrical equipment if
we are offered an attractive price and believe that we can replace it at a lower price and by the time we may need it for our internal
operations. These decisions are dynamic and based on the overall market for all of the above.
Our decision to utilize the data center space
for hosting versus self-mining will depend on the relative profitability of each segment at the time and whether we have the capital to
invest in new miners for mining for our own account at the time. In recent years, the prices of miners have fluctuated widely due to supply
and demand factors, and mining for our own account is less profitable when the price of miners is high due to the capital costs needed
to acquire the miners. In addition, the margins from mining have also fluctuated widely in recent years due to wide fluctuations in the
price of digital assets and the electricity prices need to mine digital assets.
We do not intend to mine or host anything other
than Bitcoin and only host Bitcoin ASIC computers running the SHA-256 algorithm.
We do not generally accept digital assets as
payment for goods and services. However, we have agreed to accept digital assets as payment in some situations, and expect to enter into
more such arrangements in the future. To the extent we agree to accept digital assets as payment, we intend to only accept Bitcoin. We
expect that most of our hosting contracts will provide that we receive a percentage of Bitcoin mined by our hosting customers as partial
payment for our hosting services. In addition, under our hosting agreements we have the right to apply Bitcoin mined by our hosting customers
toward payment of amounts invoiced in U.S. dollars if the invoiced amount is not paid by its due date; however, in such situations, the
credit that is applied to the U.S. dollar invoice is based on the actual cash proceeds received from the conversion of the Bitcoin into
U.S. dollars or a discount to the spot price of Bitcoin if it is not immediately converted in U.S. dollars. We have also agreed to sell
hosting containers to a third party for a note payable in Bitcoin.
We do not have a set policy in regard to how
long we hold digital assets that we receive as payment, other than to immediately sell digital assets as needed to pay operating expenses
or for capital expenditures. We do not plan to hold any digital assets that we receive as a long-term investment. We
hold our digital assets in a cold storage wallet account in our name, and not with a custodian or other intermediary. We have an account
with Gemini Trust Company, LLC, which is a qualified custodian regulated by the New York Department of Financial Services, to which we
transfer any digital assets that we decide to liquidate immediately prior to their liquidation. We do not store any digital assets at
Gemini.
Blockchain and Cryptocurrencies Generally
Bitcoin was first introduced in 2008 and was first
introduced as a means of exchange in 2009. Bitcoin is a digital asset that is issued by and transmitted through an open-source protocol
collectively maintained by a peer-to-peer network of decentralized user nodes. This network hosts a public transaction ledger, known as
the Bitcoin blockchain, on which Bitcoin holdings and transactions in Bitcoin are recorded. Balances of Bitcoin are stored in individual
“wallet” functions, which associate network public addresses with a “private key” that controls the transfer of
Bitcoin. The Bitcoin blockchain can be updated without any single entity owning or operating the network. New Bitcoin is created and allocated
by the protocol that governs Bitcoin through a “mining” process that rewards users that verify transactions in the Bitcoin
blockchain. The Bitcoin protocol limits the total issuance of Bitcoin over time to 21 million.
Bitcoin can be used to pay for goods and services,
or it can be converted to fiat currencies, such as the U.S. dollar, at rates of exchange determined by market forces on Bitcoin trading
platforms, which operate 24-hours-a-day, 7-days-a-week and are not regulated in as comprehensive a manner as traditional securities exchanges.
As a result, trading on these markets is likely more subject to manipulation than on securities markets regulated by the SEC, and pricing
on these markets is likely affected by such manipulative activity. In addition to these platforms, over-the-counter markets and derivatives
markets for Bitcoin also exist; however, these markets are still maturing and many are unregulated.
We don’t have a fixed policy regarding
fiat currencies, other than to immediately sell enough to cover operating expenses, to sell enough to cover capital expenses when required,
and to ultimately sell all of it when needs arise. We do not plan to leverage our balance sheet in order to hold bitcoin.
Bitcoin exists entirely in electronic form, as
virtually irreversible public transaction ledger entries on the blockchain, and transactions in Bitcoin are recorded and authenticated
not by a central repository, but by a decentralized peer-to-peer network. This decentralization avoids certain threats common to centralized
computer networks, such as denial of service attacks, and reduces the dependency of the Bitcoin network on any single system. While the
Bitcoin network as a whole is decentralized, the private keys used to access Bitcoin balances are not widely distributed and are held
on hardware (which can be physically controlled by the holder or by a third party such as a custodian) or via software programs on third-party
servers and loss of such private keys results in an inability to access, and effective loss of, the corresponding Bitcoin. Consequently,
Bitcoin holdings are susceptible to all of the risks inherent in holding any electronic data, such as power failure, data corruption,
security breach, communication failure, and user error, among others. These risks, in turn, make Bitcoin subject to theft, destruction,
or loss of value from hackers, corruption, or technology-specific factors such as viruses that do not affect conventional fiat currency.
In addition, the Bitcoin network relies on open-source developers to maintain and improve the Bitcoin protocol. Accordingly, Bitcoin may
be subject to protocol design changes, governance disputes such as “forked” protocols, competing protocols, and other open
source-specific risks that do not affect conventional proprietary software.
Distributed blockchain technology is a decentralized
and encrypted ledger that is designed to offer a secure, efficient, verifiable, and permanent way of storing records and other information
without the need for intermediaries. Cryptocurrencies serve multiple purposes. They can serve as a medium of exchange, store of value
or unit of account. Examples of cryptocurrencies include: Bitcoin, Bitcoin cash, and litecoin. Blockchain technologies are being evaluated
for a multitude of industries due to the belief in their ability to have a significant impact in many areas of business, finance, information
management, and governance.
Cryptocurrencies are decentralized currencies
that enable near instantaneous transfers. Transactions occur via an open source, cryptographic protocol platform which uses
peer-to-peer technology to operate with no central authority. The online network hosts the public transaction ledger, known as the
blockchain, and each cryptocurrency is associated with a source code that comprises the basis for the cryptographic and algorithmic
protocols governing the blockchain. In a cryptocurrency network, every peer has its own copy of the blockchain, which contains
records of every historical transaction - effectively containing records of all account balances. Each account is identified solely
by its unique public key (making it effectively anonymous) and is secured with its associated private key (kept secret, like a
password). The combination of private and public cryptographic keys constitutes a secure digital identity in the form of a digital
signature, providing strong control of ownership.
No single entity owns or operates the network.
The infrastructure is collectively maintained by a decentralized public user base. As the network is decentralized, it does not rely on
either governmental authorities or financial institutions to create, transmit or determine the value of the currency units. Rather, the
value is determined by market factors, supply and demand for the units, the prices being set in transfers by mutual agreement or barter
among transacting parties, as well as the number of merchants that may accept the cryptocurrency. Since transfers do not require involvement
of intermediaries or third parties, there are currently little to no transaction costs in direct peer-to-peer transactions. Units of cryptocurrency
can be converted to fiat currencies, such as the US dollar, at rates determined on various exchanges, such as Cumberland, Coinsquare (in
Canada), Coinbase, Bitsquare, Bitstamp, and others. Cryptocurrency prices are quoted on various exchanges and fluctuate with extreme volatility.
We believe cryptocurrencies offer many advantages
over traditional, fiat currencies, although many of these factors also present potential disadvantages and may introduce additional risks,
including:
|
· |
acting as a fraud deterrent, as cryptocurrencies are digital and cannot be counterfeited or reversed arbitrarily by a sender; |
|
|
|
|
· |
immediate settlement; |
|
|
|
|
· |
elimination of counterparty risk; |
|
· |
no trusted intermediary required; |
|
|
|
|
· |
lower fees; |
|
|
|
|
· |
identity theft prevention; |
|
|
|
|
· |
accessible by everyone; |
|
|
|
|
· |
transactions are verified and protected through a confirmation process, which prevents the problem of double spending; |
|
|
|
|
· |
decentralized – no central authority (government or financial institution); and |
|
|
|
|
· |
recognized universally and not bound by government imposed or market exchange rates. |
However, cryptocurrencies may not provide all of
the benefits they purport to offer at all or at any time.
As with many new and emerging technologies, there
are potentially significant risks. Businesses (including the Company) which are seeking to develop, promote, adopt, transact or rely upon
blockchain technologies and cryptocurrencies have a limited track record and operate within an untested new environment. These risks are
not only related to the businesses the Company pursues, but the sector and industry as a whole, as well as the entirety of the concept
behind blockchain and cryptocurrency as value. Factors such as access to computer processing capacity, interconnectivity, electricity
cost, environmental factors (such as cooling capacity) and location play an important role in “mining,” which is the term
for using the specialized computers in connection with the blockchain for the creation of new units of cryptocurrency.
Digital Asset Mining
Specialized computers, or “miners,”
power and secure blockchains by solving complex cryptographic algorithms to validate transactions on specific digital asset networks.
In order to add blocks to the blockchain, a miner must map an input data set consisting of the existing blockchain, plus a block of the
most recent digital asset transactions and an arbitrary number called a “nonce,” to an output data set of a predetermined
length using the SHA256 cryptographic hash algorithm. Solving these algorithms is also known as “solving or completing a block.”
Solving a block results in a reward of digital assets, such as Bitcoin, in a process known as “mining.” These rewards of digital
assets currently can be sold profitably when the sale price of the digital asset exceeds the cost of “mining,” which generally
consists of the cost of mining hardware, the cost of the electrical power to operate the machine, and other facility costs to house and
operate the equipment.
Mining processing power is generally referred
to as “hashing power.” A “hash” is the computation run by mining hardware in support of the blockchain. A miner’s
“hash rate” refers to the rate at which it is capable of solving such computations per second. Miners with higher rated hash
rate when operating at maximum efficiency have a higher chance of completing a block in the blockchain and receiving a digital asset reward.
Currently, the likelihood that an individual mining participant acting alone will solve a block and be awarded a digital asset is extremely
low. As a result, to maximize the opportunities to receive a reward, most large-scale miners have joined with other miners in “mining
pools” where the computing power of each pool participant is coordinated to complete the block on the blockchain and mining rewards
are distributed to participants in accordance with the rules of the mining pool. Fees payable to the operator of the pool vary but are
typically as much as 2% of the reward earned and are deducted from the amounts earned by each pool participant. Mining pools are subject
to various risks including connection issues, outages and other disruptions which can impact the quantity of digital assets earned by
participants.
Mathematically Controlled Supply
The method for creating new Bitcoins is mathematically
controlled in a manner so that the supply of Bitcoins grows at a limited rate pursuant to a pre-set schedule. The number of Bitcoins
awarded for solving a new block is automatically halved every 210,000 blocks. This means every block up to and including block 210,000
produced a reward of 50 Bitcoin, while blocks beginning with 210,001 produced a reward of 25 Bitcoin. Since blocks are mined on average
every 10 minutes, 144 blocks are mined per day on average. At 144 blocks per day, 210,000 blocks take four years to mine on average.
The current fixed reward for solving a new block is 6.25 Bitcoin per block and it is anticipated that the reward will decrease by half
to become 3.125 Bitcoin per block in early 2024, according to estimates of the rate of block solution calculated by BitcoinClock.com.
This deliberately controlled rate of Bitcoin creation means that the number of Bitcoins in existence will never exceed 21 million
and that Bitcoins cannot be devalued through excessive production unless the Bitcoin Network’s source code (and the underlying
protocol for Bitcoin issuance) is altered. The Company monitors the Blockchain network and, as of July 16, 2022, based on the information
we collected from our network access, more than 19 million Bitcoins have been mined.
Performance Metrics
Hash Rate
Miners perform computational operations in
support of digital asset blockchains measured in “hash rate” or “hashes per second.” A “hash”
is the computation run by mining hardware in support of the blockchain; therefore, a miner’s “hash rate” refers
to the rate at which it is capable of solving such computations. The original equipment used for mining Bitcoin utilized the Central
Processing Unit (“CPU”) of a computer to mine various forms of digital assets. Due to performance limitations, CPU mining
was rapidly replaced by the Graphics Processing Unit (“GPU”), which offers significant performance advantages over CPUs. General
purpose chipsets like CPUs and GPUs have since been replaced as the standard in the mining industry by ASIC chips
such as those found in the S17 and S19 miners that we and our customers use to mine Bitcoin. These ASIC chips are
designed specifically to maximize the rate of hashing operations.
Network Hash Rate
In digital assets mining, hash rate is a measure
of the processing speed by a mining computer for a specific digital asset. A participant in a blockchain network’s mining function
has a hash rate total of its miners seeking to mine a specific digital asset and, system-wide, there is a total hash rate of all miners
seeking to mine each specific type of digital asset. A higher total hash rate relative to the system-wide total hash rate generally
results over time in a corresponding higher success rate in digital asset rewards as compared to mining participants with relatively
lower total hash rates.
However, as the relative market price for a digital
asset increases, more users are incentivized to mine that digital asset, which increases the network’s overall hash rate.
As a result, a mining participant must increase its total hash rate in order to maintain its relative possibility
of solving a block on the network blockchain. Achieving greater hash rate power by deploying increasingly sophisticated miners in ever
greater quantities has become one of the Bitcoin mining industry’s great sources of competition. Our goal is to deploy a powerful
fleet of hosted- and self-miners, while operating as energy-efficiently as possible.
We expect to use miners with a J/TH efficiency
of 30-40 based on the current generation of ASIC computers, although we own a small number of less efficient machines. We do not intend
to accept anything lower than 82 TH/s machines in the future. Our average efficiency for machines in immersion will be approximately 36
J/TH on the current deployment. The legacy machines have an approximate efficiency of 51.5 J/TH.
Key Factors Affecting Our Performance
Market Price of Digital Assets
Our business is heavily dependent on the spot price
of Bitcoin, as well as other digital assets. The prices of digital assets, specifically Bitcoin, have experienced substantial volatility,
which may reflect “bubble” type volatility, meaning that high or low prices may have little or no relationship to identifiable
market forces, may be subject to rapidly changing investor sentiment, and may be influenced by factors such as technology, regulatory
void or changes, fraudulent actors, manipulation, and media reporting. Bitcoin (as well as other digital assets) may have value based
on various factors, including their acceptance as a means of exchange by consumers and others, scarcity, and market demand.
Our financial performance and growth depend in
large part on our ability to mine for digital assets profitably and to attract customers for our hosting services. Increases in power
costs, inability to mine digital assets efficiently and to sell digital assets at favorable prices will reduce our operating margins,
impact our ability to attract customers for our services may harm our growth prospects and could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations. Over time, there has been a positive trend in the total market capitalization
of digital assets which suggests increased adoption. However, historical trends are not indicative of future adoption, and it is possible
that the adoption of digital assets and blockchain technology may slow, take longer to develop, or never be broadly adopted, which would
negatively impact our business and operating results.
Network Hash Rate
Our business is not only impacted by the volatility
in digital asset prices, but also by increases in cost of mining digital assets, as reflected by the blockchain’s network hash rate
resulting from the growth in the overall quantity and quality of miners working to solve blocks on the blockchain and the difficulty index
associated with the secure hashing algorithm employed in solving the blocks. As more and more hash rate is needed to maintain competitiveness
on a given coin’s blockchain, miners deploy more and more machines, which require electrical power to operate, both to directly
power hash rate production and also to dissipate the significant amount of heat generated by the machines’ operation. Therefore,
as more hash rate is generated, more electric power is consumed, which generally increases the cost of mining a given coin. In response,
miners have attempted to achieve greater hash rate by deploying increasingly sophisticated miners in ever greater quantities. This has
become the cryptocurrency mining industry’s great “arms race.”
Halving
Further affecting the industry, and particularly
for the Bitcoin blockchain, the digital asset reward for solving a block is subject to periodic incremental halving. Halving is a process
designed to control the overall supply and reduce the risk of inflation in digital assets using a proof of work consensus algorithm.
At a predetermined block, the mining reward is reduced by half, hence the term “halving.”
Electricity Costs
Electricity cost is the major operating cost for
the mining fleet, both to power miners and to dissipate the heat generated by the miners’ operations, as well as for the hosting
services provided to customers and related parties. As a result, our ability to locate and select sites for our hosting centers that are
able to supply low-cost electricity for our hosting centers is key to our success.
Equipment Costs
As the market value of digital assets has increased
in 2020 and 2021, the demand for the newest, most efficient miners also increased, leading to scarcity in the supply of and thereby
a resulting increase in the price of miners. Since the market value of digital assets have declined in 2020, the demand for all types
of mines has also decreased. As a result, the cost of new machines can be unpredictable. Additionally, the demand for hosting space in
2020 and 2021 increased the demand for the equipment necessary to build and operate hosting centers, which resulted in price increases
and long lead times to acquire such equipment from manufacturers. With the decline in digital asset prices in 2022, the market for hosting
equipment has shifted back in favor of buyers, although not as much as has been the case with mining equipment. Our ability to secure
the necessary equipment in a timely manner, while maintaining proper cost controls, will be key to our success.
Our Customers
In addition to factors underlying our mining business
growth and profitability, our success greatly depends on our ability to retain and develop opportunities with our existing customers and
to attract new customers. Our business environment is constantly evolving, and digital asset miners can range from individual enthusiasts
to professional mining operations with dedicated data centers. We compete with other companies that focus all or a portion of
their activities on mining activities at scale. We face significant competition in every aspect of our business, including, but not limited
to, the acquisition of new miners, the ability to raise capital, obtaining low-cost electricity, obtaining access to energy
sites with reliable sources of power, and evaluating new technology developments in the industry.
At present, the information concerning the activities
of these enterprises may not be readily available as the vast majority of the participants in this sector do not publish information publicly
or the information may be unreliable. Published sources of information include “Bitcoin.org” and “blockchain.info”;
however, the reliability of that information and its continued availability cannot be assured.
From the third fiscal quarter of calendar year
2020 through 2021, the market prices of digital assets increased substantially, which resulted in an increase in the scale and sophistication
of competition in the digital asset mining industry, with new entrants and existing competitors gaining access to substantial capital
resources to build larger and larger mining operations. This caused many new and existing competitors may be encouraged to build or expand
their Bitcoin mining operations. In 2022, as digital asset prices have fallen, the trend has somewhat reversed, but not entirely as a
result of projects and commitments made by industry participants before 2022. The market has also been impacted by the trend of some
countries (mainly China) that formerly were major hosting centers to outlaw or greatly restrict digital asset mining within their borders.
While we do not believe that we are subject
to anti-money laundering laws in the United States as this time, we verify that our customers are not listed on OFAC’s SDN list
on a voluntary basis.
Competition
Our business environment is constantly evolving,
and cryptocurrency miners can range from individual enthusiasts to professional mining operations with dedicated data centers. We compete
with other companies that focus all or a portion of their activities on mining activities at scale. We face significant competition in
every aspect of our business, including, but not limited to, the acquisition of new miners, the ability to raise capital, obtaining the
lowest cost of electricity, obtaining access to energy sites with reliable sources of power, and evaluating new technology developments
in the industry.
At present, the information concerning the activities
of these enterprises may not be readily available as the vast majority of the participants in this sector do not publish information publicly
or the information may be unreliable. Published sources of information include “Bitcoin.org” and “blockchain.info”;
however, the reliability of that information and its continued availability cannot be assured.
We believe, based on available data, that the trend
of increasing market prices for Bitcoin and other major cryptocurrencies that began in the third fiscal quarter of calendar year 2020
has resulted in an increase in the scale and sophistication of competition in the cryptocurrency mining industry, with new entrants and
existing competitors gaining access to substantial capital resources to build larger and larger mining operations. If this trend of increasing
market prices for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies continues, which we believe has occurred (though with significant volatility) into
calendar year 2021, we believe many new and existing competitors may be encouraged to build or scale Bitcoin mining operations.
Despite this trend, we believe, based on our access
to necessary equipment, we will be able to maintain a competitive hash rate capacity among both public and private Bitcoin miners. However,
to stay competitive in our evolving industry, both against new entrants into the market and existing competitors, we anticipate that we
will have to continue to expand our existing miner fleet by purchasing the latest generation of miners, as well as innovating to develop
and implement new technologies and mining solutions.
Regulation
Our financial prospects and continued growth depend
in part on our ability to continue to operate in a compliant manner with all rules and regulations. Blockchain and digital currencies
are increasingly becoming subject to governmental regulation, both in the U.S. and internationally. State and local regulations also may
apply to our activities and other activities in which we may participate in the future. Other governmental or semi-governmental regulatory
bodies have shown an interest in regulating or investigating companies engaged in the blockchain or cryptocurrency business. For instance,
the Cyber-Digital Task Force of the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) published a report entitled “Cryptocurrency:
An Enforcement Framework” in October 2020. This report provides a comprehensive overview of the possible threats and enforcement
challenges the DOJ views as associated with the use and prevalence of cryptocurrency, as well as the regulatory and investigatory means
the DOJ has at its disposal to deal with these possible threats and challenges. Further, in early March 2021, the SEC chairperson nominee
expressed an intent to focus on investor protection issues raised by Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
Presently, we do not believe any U.S. or State
regulatory body has taken any action or position adverse to our main cryptocurrency, Bitcoin, with respect to its production, sale, and
use as a medium of exchange; however, future changes to existing regulations or entirely new regulations may affect our business in ways
it is not presently possible for us to predict with any reasonable degree of reliability.
Further, following the appreciation of the market
price of Bitcoin in the second half of 2020, we have observed increasing media attention directed at the environmental concerns associated
with cryptocurrency mining, particularly its energy-intensive nature. While we do not believe any U.S.-based regulators have taken a position
adverse to Bitcoin mining, in March 2021, the governmental authorities for the Chinese province of Inner Mongolia, which represents roughly
8% of the world’s total mining power, implemented an outright ban on Bitcoin mining in the province due to the industry’s
intense electrical power demands and its negative environmental impacts (both in terms of the waste produced by mining the rare Earth
metals used to manufacture miners and the production of electrical power used in Bitcoin mining). Later, China extended the ban to the
entire nation of China, effective as of the end of July 2021. While we have yet to see whether these miners will be able to relocate to
another location outside of China and Mongolia to continue mining, this action serves as a stark reminder of the power of national and
state governments to affect our industry through regulator action.
As the regulatory and legal environment evolves,
we may become subject to new laws, such as further regulation by the SEC and other agencies, which may affect our mining and other activities.
For additional discussion regarding our belief about the potential risks existing and future regulation pose to our business, see the
Section entitled “Risk Factors” herein.
Our Facilities
We initially planned to locate our initial facilities
in Trinidad, because it has some of the cheapest electricity in the world due to its abundant supplies of oil and gas and because some
of our technical staff is located there. We have entered into an agreement with Telecommunications Services of Trinidad & Tobago Limited
(“TSTT”), the largest and oldest telecom company in Trinidad, to co-locate up to 125 800 kw containers for hosting digital
asset miners. TSTT has up to 93 potential locations for co-location of our containers. Under the agreement, we have the option, but not
obligation, to co-locate containers at our own pace. We pay a fixed amount per container, plus the actual electricity costs incurred by
our containers in the amount billed to TSTT by the local utility without any markup. The agreement provides that our hosting containers
will be billed for electricity usage at the local utility’s standard rates, which is the greater of 3.5 cents per kwh or 75% of
the declared reserve capacity, which is equal to the customer’s highest expected monthly kilovolt-ampere demand at $7.40. The term
of the agreement expires on October 14, 2031. However, we have the right to terminate our agreement with TSTT at any time that the price
for electricity consumption exceeds $0.05 per kwh. Also, both parties have the right to terminate the agreement on one month notice to
the other party in either the third or sixth year of the term.
As of December 2021, electricity prices in
Trinidad and Tobago averaged 5.2 cents per kilowatt-hour, which is the average price among all households, which ranks it among the lowest
rates available in the world. In particular, Trinidad and Tobago ranked 34th out of 148 countries surveyed in terms of the
affordability of its electricity prices. In comparison, the average price in the United States was 16.2 cents per kwh, and in Canada
was 10.7 cents per kwh. Most countries with lower rates are have either unstable political environments or inadequate and unstable electrical
infrastructure that make then unsuitable for data centers. See https://globalpetrolprices.com/electricity_prices/
. The rate that we expect to pay is 3.5 cents
per kwh, which is less than the average in Trinidad and Tobago, because electricity to our facilities will be supplied through TSTT’s
contract with the local utility.
In October 2022, we completed the installation
of initial hosting containers under our agreement with TSTT. However, prior to commencing operations, TSTT advised us that the local utility
had refused to honor its existing agreement with TSTT with respect to electricity supplied to our hosting containers, and instead indicated
that the rate would be approximately $0.09 per kwh. TSTT has informed us that it does not believe that the local utility’s contract
entitles it to vary the rate it charges for the use of electricity and has protested the decision. At this time, we are unable to predict
how this dispute between TSTT and the local utility will be resolved, what form any resolution may take or how long any resolution may
take. Accordingly, we are delaying the installation of additional containers in Trinidad until this dispute is resolved.
We lease 1,800 square feet of warehouse space
in Trinidad that we use to house a 72-slot fan cooled container that we also lease. The warehouse lease is for eleven months beginning
on February 1, 2022 and provides for rental payments of $3,818 per month. The container lease is for twelve months beginning February
1, 2022, and provides for rental payments of $2,500 per month. We are using this space as a temporary facility for our initial hosting
customer until our permanent facilities become operational.
In light of the recent developments in Trinidad,
we are focusing our efforts in the near term on developing hosting locations in the United States and Canada. We are exploring situations
where medium to long-term power agreements may be available at affordable prices, whether using traditional power sources such as coal
or natural gas, as well as environmentally friendly sources such as hydroelectric, wind and solar-backed projects, which might allow us
to generate collateral revenue from the sale of excess power to the local utility grid and from the generation of saleable carbon credits.
The Company’s president allows the Company
to utilized the office space of an affiliated company for its executive offices without charge to the Company.
Hosting Equipment
Our focus is to build data center using immersion
hosting containers. In 2021 and 2022, we purchased a total of ten immersion hosting containers from Submer for an average of $255,000
each. We have deployed or sold the immersion containers as follows:
| · | We installed two of the immersion containers at our initial co-location
facility in Trinidad, although operations are the facility are currently delayed pending the resolution of a dispute between TSTT and
the local utility regarding the rate that will be charged for electricity supplied to the facility. |
| · | In August 2022, we sold two immersion containers to a third party in Trinidad
for $960,000, of which $910,000 is payable over two years with interest at 7.5% per annum, for monthly payments of $40,950 per month.
|
| · | In October 2022, we sold four immersion containers to a joint venture
with ROC Digital Mining I, LLC (“ROC Digital”) for $1,200,000, and made an equity contribution of one immersion container.
Our equity contribution also included six GE Protec 1500 KVA transformers valued at $150,000 each. |
| · | Under our agreement with ROC Digital, we retained the right to install
one container at the joint venture’s hosting site, which we are entitled to use for self-mining or hosting third party miners. |
Although we originally bought our immersion
containers with the intention of using them purely for hosting third party equipment, we elected to sell two of the containers because
we were offered an attractive price for them and because we did not a suitable location to install them in the short-term. While we do
not have any agreements to purchase additional immersion containers from Submer, we believe that additional immersion containers available
for purchase from Submer or other vendors as we need them for additional hosting facilities.
Mining Equipment
Digital asset mining is dependent on specialized
digital asset mining hardware utilizing application-specific integrated circuit (“ASIC”) chips to solve blocks on blockchains
using the 256-bit secure hashing algorithm. Almost all of these miners are produced outside of the United States, mostly in China and
Southeast Asia, by a few manufacturers, the largest of which is Bitmain Technologies, Ltd (“Bitmain”). Our principal supplier
for miners has been Bitmain. Our mining business is highly dependent upon digital asset mining equipment suppliers such as Bitmain providing
an adequate supply of new generation digital asset mining machines at economical prices to enable profitable mining by us and by third-party
customers intending to purchase our hosting and other solutions.
We do not have any agreements for the acquisition
of miners. To date, we have purchased miners opportunistically as they been available for sale in the “spot” market. Based
on historical market activity, as the market value of digital assets increases, the demand for the newest, most efficient miners will
also increase, leading to scarcity in the supply, and thereby a resulting increase in the price of miners. If we need to purchase miners
in larger quantities in order to fill data center capacity, we have to enter into formal agreements with Bitmain or other suppliers. These
agreements, like those of other miner manufacturers, generally require significant refundable deposits payable months in advance of delivery
and additional advance payments in monthly installments thereafter. These agreements also contain other terms and conditions favorable
to the manufacturer.
As of November 4, 2022, we own a total of 362
miners, consisting of: 25 Whatsminers, 72 Antimer T-19s, 25 Canaan Avalons, and 240 Antminer S-19s (not including defective or retired
miners). We initially sold a number of the miners to our initial hosting client, but recently terminated the hosting relationship and
required the miners (along with other miners) in order to concentrate on self-mining. For our current inventory of miners, we paid an
average of $2,587 per machine, or $29.99 per terahash. The miners that we owned as of November 4, 2022 have an average mining efficiency
of 38.34 j/TH.
Due to the significant drop in the price of
miners (70-80% since early 2021) relative to the cost of the datacenter and electrical equipment needed to host the miners has led us
to focus more on self-mining, since the capital investment needed to self-mine is significantly less than last year.
Patents and Trademarks
We intend to protect our intellectual property
rights through a combination of trademark, patent, copyright and trade secrets laws.
Employees and Independent Contractors
As of November 4, 2022, we had six employees
and independent contractors, which do not include our officers, who are performing services without a contract or compensation until
we raise capital.
We have no collective bargaining agreements with
our employees, and believe all independent contractor and employment agreements relationships are satisfactory. We hire independent contractors
on an as-needed basis, and we may retain additional employees and consultants during the next twelve months, including additional executive
management personnel with substantial experience in development business.
Corporate Information
We were originally known as Sandy Springs Holdings,
Inc. On July 16, 2021, we changed our name to Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc.
Our principal executive offices are located
at 2030 Powers Ferry Road SE, Suite 212, Atlanta, Georgia 30339, and our telephone number is (404) 816-8240. Our corporate website address
is www.bitminetech.io. Information contained on or accessible through our website is not a part of this prospectus, and the inclusion
of our website address in this prospectus is an inactive textual reference only.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is subject to litigation claims arising
in the ordinary course of business. The Company believes that it has adequately accrued for legal matters in accordance with the requirements
of GAAP. The Company records litigation accruals for legal matters which are both probable and estimable and for related legal costs as
incurred. The Company does not reduce these liabilities for potential insurance or third-party recoveries.
The Company is not a party to any legal proceedings
at this time.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS
WITH ACCOUNTANTS
None.
MANAGEMENT
Directors
The following table provides information regarding
current directors and executive officers as of November 4, 2022:
Name |
|
Age |
|
Title |
|
Director Since |
Jonathan Bates |
|
52 |
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board |
|
July 2021 |
Erik S. Nelson |
|
55 |
|
President and Director |
|
July 2020 |
Raymond Mow |
|
56 |
|
Chief Financial Officer and Director |
|
July 2021 |
Seth Bayles |
|
42 |
|
Corporate Secretary and Director |
|
July 2021 |
Michael Maloney |
|
36 |
|
Director |
|
July 2021 |
Jonathan Bates has served as our Chairman
of the Board since July 2021 and our Chief Executive Office since May 2022. With more than 25 years of financial industry experience,
Mr. Bates has spent his career analyzing the interrelations of a vast number of different markets. He has developed a deep understanding
of institutional trading environments and multi-asset portfolios is a critical resource to the operations he oversees. In addition
to his role as chairman of the Company, Mr. Bates is also the Chief Investment Officer and General Partner of Progression Asset Management
(an affiliate of Integrated Advisors Network, LLC) since January 2019, and its subsidiary, Innovative Digital Investors, LLC, which is
the general partner of Innovative Digital Investors Emerging Technology L.P., a private investment fund. From November 2017 to January
2019, Mr. Bates served as a Managing Partner of Boustead Capital Partners, LLC, registered broker dealer. Mr. Bates has twice served
as a Managing Director of J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC, from 2009 to July 2012 and from July 2015 to November 2017. In between his stints
at J.P. Morgan, from July 2012 to July 2015, Mr. Bates served as a Director at Barclays Wealth U.S. Over the course of his career, Mr.
Bates has, at different times, held the Series 7, 9, 10 and 65 licenses. At Innovative Digital, Mr. Bates has helped drive several private
companies from early stages to public markets in both the U.S. and Canada. We believe that Mr. Bates is highly qualified to serve
on our board due to his knowledge and experience technology startups, which should be instrumental as the Company grows its business
and pursues a listing of its common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market or the NYSE. Mr. Bates graduated from the University of Texas
at Austin in 1992 with a degree in Business Finance.
Erik S. Nelson has served as our President since
May 2022 and a director since July 2020. In addition to his role as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Mr. Nelson is also the
Corporate Secretary and a member of the Board of Nocera, Inc. since 2011, and was previously its President from 2017 to 2019. Mr. Nelson
was the sole officer (CEO, President, and CFO) and sole Director of Vinings Holdings, Inc. (October 2019 – February 2021) Mr. Nelson
is also the President of Coral Capital Advisors, LLC. An advisory services firm founded in 1995 that provides services to privately held
and publicly traded companies. Since September 2012, Mr. Nelson has been President of Mountain Share Transfer, LLC, an SEC registered
stock transfer agent. Mr. Nelson is a graduate of the University of Colorado (1989) with a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration
degree, with an emphasis in Finance. We believe that Mr. Nelson is highly qualified to serve on our board due to his extensive experience
with the public markets and companies.
Mountain Share Transfer and Erik Nelson consented
to an SEC Order in 2015 related to failure to file an updated correct TA-1 Form and other administrative violations and disclosure matters
of the Transfer Agent, Mountain Share Transfer (Administrative Proceeding file no. 3-16378, 34 Act Rel. no. 74226).
Raymond Mow has served as our Chief Financial
Officer and a director since July 2021. With more than 30 years of financial industry experience, Mr. Mow has spent his career managing
and analyzing fixed income mutual funds and institutional portfolios. He has developed a broad knowledge of various asset classes
as well as interpreting and forecasting domestic and international economic measures. In addition to his role as Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, Mr. Mow also serves as Chief Investment Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of Progression Asset Management, as position
he has held since January 2020, and Portfolio Manager of its subsidiary, Innovative Digital Investors, LLC, which is the general
partner of Innovative Digital Investors Emerging Technology L.P., a private investment fund specializing in equity investments in cutting
edge technology companies. From March 2018 to March 2019, Mr. Mow held the position of Managing Director of Fixed Income at First Foundation
Advisers overseeing $2.3 billion. As a member of the investment policy committee, Mr. Mow collaborated on asset allocation policy and
portfolio construction. From 1995-2018, Mr. Mow was Senior Portfolio Manager at Highmark Capital Management, overseeing $2 billion in
fixed income assets. Mr. Mow currently holds a Series 65 license. Mr. Mow graduated in 1989 from University of Hawaii, Manoa with a BBA-Finance
degree. We believe that Mr. Mow is highly qualified to serve on our board due to his extensive experience financial analysis and reporting.
Michael Maloney has served
as a director since July 2021. Mr. Maloney is digital currency and blockchain technology expert who has been active in the space since
2011. He serves as an advisor to several industry leading companies, and is regularly featured as an industry commentator and educator
at public events.
Mr. Maloney most recently
served as the CFO for Coinmint, LLC from July 2019 to October 2021. At Coinmint, he developed partnerships with several large public companies
and high-net worth private institutions that made Coinmint one of the largest cryptocurrency mining operations in North America. Under
his tenure, hashrate increased from 1.3EH to over 7EH (~5% of the Bitcoin network), all from increased co-hosting contracts. He was able
to grow revenues by over 600% over this same period. Since August 2019, Mr. Maloney has also served as an Adjunct Professor at Fordham
Law School and Fordham Gabelli Business, teaching “Blockchain, Virtual Currencies, and Tokens: Business and Legal Issues.”
Mr. Maloney helps coordinate the Fordham Law Blockchain Regulatory Symposium which draws US and international regulators and financial
experts together to discuss industry trends.
From November 2017 to September
2018, Mr. Maloney co-founded Galaxy Digital, the first merchant bank to serve the blockchain space, as the Managing Director. In this
position, he directed both the Digital Strategy and Transaction Advisory practices to assist clients in the build and financing of blockchain
technologies. Mr. Maloney also supported the development of trade and compliance technologies and provided technical critiques for the
venture group.
Mr. Maloney co-founded Themys,
a blockchain insurance and risk management protocol in October 2018. There he wrote and patented the first Blockchain Derived Hashrate
Bond developed to assist cryptocurrency miners finance ASIC purchases. He left in July 2019 to join Coinmint. Mr. Maloney was a founding
member of Ernst & Young’s (EY) Distributed Ledger Technology group, and led global blockchain development for the firm. From
June 2013 to September 2017, he assisted in the development of numerous blockchain applications for clients across a variety of industries,
including: digital goods and games trading, supply chain management, anti-money laundering and KYC regulatory compliance, and language
processing and machine learning marketplaces.
Since September 2016, Mr.
Maloney has also served as CTO for a blockchain based non-profit organization, eduDAO. eduDAO currently assists non-profits in exploring
blockchain and assessing the viability of DAOs for the funding needs. Mr. Maloney has a B.A. degree from Fordham University.
We believe that Mr. Maloney is highly qualified
to serve on our board due to his extensive experience in the blockchain and bitcoin mining operations.
Seth Bayles has served as our Corporate Secretary
and a director since July 2021. Mr. Bayles is a Corporate Attorney with over 15 years of experience practicing in the areas of entertainment,
finance, technology, and commercial contracts. He has negotiated and drafted complex commercial agreements including multimedia, vendor,
union, talent, channel, and technology-related agreements. Since 2017, he has served as the general counsel of Hospitality International
Group, Inc. From 2016 to 2021, he served as general counsel and chief compliance officer of Credit Key, Inc. From 2015 to 2016, he served
as director, legal affairs and business development, with ZestFinance, Inc. Prior to joining the corporate world, he worked as an associate
at Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLC in its Washington, DC office, and King & Spalding, LLP in its Washington, DC’s office. He
has his B.A. in Economics and History from Brandeis University, a J.D. from the Emory University School of Law, and an L.L.M. from the
Georgetown University Law Center. We believe that Mr. Bayles is highly qualified to serve on our board due to his extensive experience
as a corporate attorney and in regulatory affairs.
Executive Officers who are not Directors
Ryan Ramnath has served as our Chief Operating
Officer since July 2021. Ryan Ramnath currently holds the role as Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Bitflair Mining Corp. (“Bitfair”),
a Canadian owned Trinidad-operated liquid cooled bitcoin mine. Mr. Ramnath co-founded Bitflair in 2017 and was instrumental in navigating
the local Trinidad environment to successfully launch the first liquid-cooled bitcoin mine in the Caribbean. Since 2014, Mr. Ramnath has
worked in various engineering capacities in the upstream and downstream energy sectors. Mr. Ramnath worked for the National Gas Company
of Trinidad and Tobago from June 2014 to August 2014 as reliability engineer intern. Mr. Ramnath worked for Imperial Oil Company as a
pipeline engineer from September 2015 to April 2016. Mr. Ramnath worked for BHP Billiton has a drilling engineering Intern from June 2016
to August 2016. Mr. Ramnath has worked for Royal Dutch Shell since January 2018 to the present, first as a wellsite operations engineer
from until July 2019, and thereafter as drilling engineer. As the CEO of Bitflair Mining Corp, Mr. Ramnath has developed special skills
in the design, engineering and implementation of solutions in the liquid-cooled hosting business. Mr. Ramnath was appointed as the Chief
Operating Officer (COO) of Bitmine Immersion Technologies in 2021 due to his comprehensive understanding of the liquid-cooled bitcoin
mining infrastructure and ability to build, fix and repair any mechanical issues which may arise. Mr. Ramnath graduated from the University
of Toronto with a Mechanical Engineering – High 5 Distinction.
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships between or among
any of the current directors, executive officers or persons nominated or charged to become directors or executive officers. There are
no family relationships among our officers and directors and those of our subsidiaries and affiliated companies.
Board Composition
Our business and affairs are organized under the
direction of our board of directors, which currently consists of five members. Our Bylaws provide that the authorized number of directors
may be changed only by resolution of the board of directors. Our directors hold office until the earlier of their death, resignation,
removal or disqualification, or until their successors have been elected and qualified. Our board of directors does not have a formal
policy on whether the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our board of directors should be separate. The primary responsibilities
of our board of directors are to provide oversight, strategic guidance, counselling and direction to our management. Our board of directors
meets on an as-needed basis.
We have no formal policy regarding board diversity.
Our priority in selection of board members is identification of members who will further the interests of our stockholders through his
or her established record of professional accomplishment, the ability to contribute positively to the collaborative culture among board
members, knowledge of our business and understanding of the competitive landscape.
Conflicts of Interest
Certain of the officers and directors of the Company
are engaged in other businesses, either individually or through partnerships and corporations in which they have an interest, hold an
office, or serve on a board of directors. Currently, none of our officers are required to devote 100% of their time and attention to the
affairs of the Company. As a result, certain conflicts of interest may arise between the Company and its officers and directors. The Company
will attempt to resolve such conflicts of interest in favor of the Company. The officers and directors of the Company are accountable
to it and its shareholders as fiduciaries, which require that such officers and directors exercise good faith and integrity in handling
the Company’s affairs. A shareholder may be able to institute legal action on behalf of the Company or on behalf of itself and other similarly
situated shareholders to recover damages or for other relief in cases of the resolution of conflicts is in any manner prejudicial to the
Company.
Corporate Governance
We do not have a separate Compensation Committee,
Audit Committee or Nominating Committee. These functions are conducted by our Board of Directors acting as a whole. During the fiscal
year ended August 31, 2021, our Board of Directors held no meetings and took action by written consent in lieu of a meeting on nine occasions.
There are no understandings between any director
of our company or any other person pursuant to which any officer or director was or is to be selected as an officer or director, except
that the Company’s employment agreement with Chris Moses provides that the Company is obligated to appoint Mr. Moses to a vacant
seat on the board, and nominate him for election as a director at any annual meeting of shareholders, to the extent Mr. Moses desires
to serve on the board. To date, Mr. Moses has not exercised his right to serve on the board.
Director Independence
Our current board consists of Erik Nelson, Jonathan
Bates, Raymond Mow, Seth Bayles, and Michael Maloney. Our common stock is currently quoted on the Pink OTC Market. Since the Pink
OTC Market does not have its own rules for director independence, we use the definition of independence established by the NASDAQ
Stock Market. Under applicable NASDAQ Stock Market rules, a director will only qualify as an “independent director” if the
director has not, at any time in the past three years, (a) been employed by us, (b) received more than $120,000 in compensation from
us, other than for board services, (c) had a family member who was employed as an executive officer of us, (d) been, or had a family
member that was, a partner, controlling shareholder or executive officer of any organization that received payments for property or services
that exceeded the greater of 5% of the recipient’s gross revenues or $200,000, (e) been, or had a family member that was, employed
as an executive officer of another entity during the past three years where any of the executive officers of us serve on the compensation
committee, or (f) been, or had a family member that was, a partner in our auditor at any time in the past three years. At this time,
we have determined that we have one independent director: Michael Maloney.
Shareholder Communications with Our Board of
Directors
The Company welcomes comments and questions from
our shareholders. Shareholders should direct all communications to our Secretary, Seth Bayles, at our executive offices. However, while
we appreciate all comments from shareholders, we may not be able to respond individually to all communications. We will attempt to address
shareholder questions and concerns in our press releases and documents filed with the SEC, so that all shareholders have access to information
about us at the same time. Mr. Bayles collects and evaluates all shareholder communications. All communications addressed to our directors
and executive officers will be reviewed by those parties, unless the communication is clearly frivolous.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a written code of business conduct
and ethics that applies to our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer,
principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. The code of business conduct and ethics is posted
on our website at www.bluewatervaccines.com.
EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
The following identifies the elements of compensation
for fiscal years 2021 and 2020 with respect to our “named executive officers,” which term is defined by Item 402 of the SEC’s
Regulation S-K to include (i) all individuals serving as our principal executive officer at any time during fiscal year 2021, (ii) our
two most highly compensated executive officers other than the principal executive officer who were serving as executive officers at August
31, 2021 and whose total compensation (excluding nonqualified deferred compensation earnings) exceeded $100,000, and (iii) up to two additional
individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided pursuant to the foregoing item (ii) but for the fact that the individual was
not serving as an executive officer of the Company at August 31, 2021.
Based on our compensation for the fiscal year ended
August 31, 2021, Erik Nelson constitutes our only “named executive officers” pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K.
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
Fiscal |
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year |
|
Salary |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Total |
|
Erik S. Nelson (1) |
|
2021 |
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
|
2020 |
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
1) |
Mr. Nelson has been the Company’s chief executive officer since July 16, 2020. Mr. Nelson did not receive any compensation for his services for either the 2020 or 2021 fiscal years. |
The Company does not provide its officers
or employees with pension, stock appreciation rights, long-term incentive or other plans. The Company does not have a defined benefit,
pension, profit sharing plan, or a 401(k) plan. We did not grant any stock options or stock appreciation rights to our named executive
officers in the last fiscal year. We did not reprice any options or stock appreciation rights during the last fiscal year. We did not
waive or modify any specified performance target, goal or condition to payout with respect to any amount included in any incentive plan
compensation included in the summary compensation table.
Compensation Philosophy
The board is responsible for creating and reviewing
the compensation of our executive officers, as well as overseeing our compensation and benefit plans and policies and administering our
equity incentive plans. We believe in providing a competitive total compensation package to its executives through a combination of base
salary, annual performance bonuses, and long-term equity awards. The executive compensation program is designed to achieve the following
objectives:
|
· |
provide competitive compensation that will help attract, retain and reward qualified executives; |
|
· |
align executives’ interests with our success by making a portion of the executive’s compensation dependent upon corporate performance; and |
|
· |
align executives’ interests with the interests of stockholders by including long-term equity incentives. |
The board believes
that our executive compensation program should include annual and long-term components, including cash and equity-based compensation,
and should reward consistent performance that meets or exceeds expectations. The board evaluates both performance and compensation to
make sure that the compensation provided to executives remains competitive relative to compensation paid by companies of similar size
and stage of development operating in the payment processing industry and taking into account our relative performance and its own strategic
objectives.
Notwithstanding the above, the Company is not currently
paying any compensation to its executive officers until it raises additional capital to fund its business and capital expenditure needs.
Outstanding Equity Awards At Fiscal Year-End
None of the named executive officers have any unvested
equity awards or unexercised options in the Company as of August 31, 2021.
Employment Agreements
The Company does not have any employment agreements
with any of its executive officers, except for Ryan Ramnath, the Company’s chief operating officer. Mr. Ramnath and the Company
are party to an employment agreement dated July 19, 2021, under which Mr. Ramnath is employed for three years as chief operating officer,
and is entitled to compensation of $4,000 per month effective September 1, 2021 with no benefits.
Severance and Change of Control Benefits
The Company does not currently have any agreements
with its named executive officers or directors which provide for severance or change of control benefits.
Employee Benefit Plans and Pension Benefits
The Company does not provide its officers or employees
with pension, stock appreciation rights, long-term incentive or other plans. The Company does not have a defined benefit, pension, profit-sharing
plan or 401(k) plan.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
None of our NEOs are covered by a deferred contribution
or other plan that provides for the deferral of compensation on a basis that is not tax-qualified.
Director Compensation
The following table details the total compensation
earned by our non-employee directors during the year ended August 31, 2021.
Name |
|
Fee Earned or Paid in Cash
($) (1) |
|
|
Restricted
Stock
Awards
($) (2) |
|
|
All Other
Compensation
($) |
|
|
Total
($) |
|
Michael Maloney |
|
– |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
– |
|
|
60,000 |
|
Seth Bayles |
|
– |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
– |
|
|
7,500 |
|
(1) |
Excludes travel expense reimbursements. |
(2) |
Includes 4,000,000 shares issued to Mr. Maloney and 500,000 shares issued to Mr. Bayles as compensation for agreeing to join the board of directors. The shares were valued at $0.015, which is the price at which the Company sold shares for cash in a contemporaneous offering to third parties. |
There were no options outstanding to directors
as of August 31, 2021.
Our board does not have a current compensation
policy for its directors. However, we reimburse our directors for reasonable travel and other related expenses. Once we raise capital,
we intend to develop a board compensation plan that is consistent with market norms for similar sized companies.
Limitation of Liability and Indemnification
Matters
Section 102 of DGCL permits a Delaware corporation
to adopt provisions in its Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws limit or eliminate the personal liability of our directors for a breach
of their fiduciary duty of care as a director. Any such provision does not apply to: any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty
to us or our stockholders; any act or omission not in good faith or that involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
any act related to unlawful stock repurchases, redemptions or other distributions or payment of dividends; or any transaction from which
the director derived an improper personal benefit. We have adopted such a provision in our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
but not our Bylaws.
Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
and Bylaws require us to indemnify any officer and director who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to or is involved
in any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (hereinafter a “proceeding”),
by reason of the fact that he or she, or a person of whom he or she is the legal representative, is or was a director or officer of the
corporation or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or
of a partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, including service with respect to employee benefit plans, to the fullest
extent permitted by the laws of Delaware, provided however, that except for any proceeding seeking to enforce or obtain payment under
any right to indemnification by the corporation, the corporation shall indemnify any such person seeking indemnification in connection
with a proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by such person only if the corporation has joined in or consented to the initiation of
such proceeding (or part thereof).
To date, we are not required to pay any costs of
indemnification, by direct payment or reimbursement of reasonable expenses (including attorneys’ fees and disbursements) in advance
of the final disposition of the proceeding, except by the approval of the board of directors.
In addition, we may enter into separate indemnification
agreements with some of our directors and officers. These indemnification agreements, among other things, may require us to indemnify
our directors and officers for certain expenses, including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and settlement amounts incurred by
a director or officer in any action or proceeding arising out of their services as a director or officer, or any other company or enterprise
to which the person provides services at our request.
In the future, we may obtain a directors’
and officers’ insurance policy pursuant to which our directors and officers are insured against liability for actions taken in their
capacities as directors and officers. We believe that these provisions in our Bylaws and these indemnification agreements, if entered
into, are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors and officers.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, may be permitted to directors, officers or control persons,
in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy, as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth, as of November
4, 2022, certain information concerning the beneficial ownership of our common stock by (i) each person known by us to own beneficially
five percent (5%) or more of the outstanding shares of each class, (ii) each of our directors and named executive officers,
and (iii) all of our executive officers and directors as a group.
The number of shares beneficially owned by each
5% stockholder, director or executive officer is determined under the rules of the Securities & Exchange Commission, or SEC, and
the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under those rules, beneficial ownership
includes any shares as to which the individual or entity has sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares that
the individual or entity has the right to acquire within 60 days after November 4, 2022 through the exercise of any stock option,
warrant or other right, or the conversion of any security. Unless otherwise indicated, each person or entity has sole voting and investment
power (or shares such power with his or her spouse) with respect to the shares set forth in the following table. The inclusion in the
table below of any shares deemed beneficially owned does not constitute an admission of beneficial ownership of those shares.
Name |
|
Shares Beneficially Owned |
|
Percent
of Common Stock (1) |
5% Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
Jonathan Bates (2) |
|
23,595,583 |
|
41.8% |
Innovative Digital Investors Emerging Technology, LP (2) |
|
16,786,887 |
|
31.2% |
Rykor Energy Solutions, LLC (3) |
|
8,016,000 |
|
14.9% |
Sam Jorgensen (4) |
|
6,887,754 |
|
14.2% |
BFAM Partners, LLC (2) |
|
4,200,000 |
|
8.7% |
Michael Maloney |
|
4,000,000 |
|
8.2% |
Abed Equities (5) |
|
3,650,000 |
|
7.5% |
BitFlair Mining Corp. (6) |
|
3,443,877 |
|
7.1% |
Erik S. Nelson (7) |
|
3,255,000 |
|
6.7% |
Coral Investment Partners, LP (8) |
|
2,505,000 |
|
5.1% |
Directors and Named Executive Officers |
|
|
|
|
Jonathan Bates (2) |
|
23,595,583 |
|
41.8% |
Michael Maloney |
|
4,000,000 |
|
8.2% |
Ryan Ramnath (9) |
|
3,443,877 |
|
7.1% |
Erik S. Nelson (7) |
|
2,655,000 |
|
6.6% |
Raymond Mow |
|
1,250,000 |
|
4.3% |
Seth Bayles |
|
500,000 |
|
1.0% |
Officers and Directors as a Group |
|
36,894,460 |
|
64.1% |
|
(1) |
Based on 48,548,091 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of November 4, 2022. |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Includes (i) 11,500,000 shares owned by Innovative Digital Investors Emerging Technology, LP (“Innovative”), (ii) 5,286,887 shares that Innovative has the right to acquire upon the conversion of 303,966 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, (iii) 4,200,000 shares owned by BFAM Partners, LLC, of which Mr. Bates is the 100% owner, and (iv) 2,608,696 shares that Mr. Bates has the right to acquire upon the conversion of 150,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. Mr. Bates has sole voting and investment power of any shares owned by Innovative by virtue of his ownership of its general partner. Mr. Bates has sole voting and investment power of any shares owned by BFAM and Co. BFAM and Co. and an individual retirement account established by Mr. Bates own approximately 14.63% of Innovative. Mr. Bates owns 90% of BFAM and Co., and a trust established for his children on the remaining 10%. Mr. Bates disclaims beneficial ownership of any shares owned by Innovative beyond his percentage interest in such entity. |
|
(3) |
Includes (i) 2,672,000 shares held outright, (ii)
2,672,000 Class C-1 Warrants which are exercisable immediately, and (iii) 2,672,000 Class C-2 Warrants which are exercisable
immediately. John Kelly and Nick Marrocco have shared voting and investment power over the securities owned by Rykor
Energy Solutions, LLC. |
|
|
|
|
(4) |
Includes (i) 3,443,877 shares owned by Mr. Jorgensen and (ii) 3,443,877 shares owned by BitFlair Mining Corp. (“BitFlair”), of which Mr. Jorgensen has shared voting and investment power. Mr. Jorgenson disclaims beneficial ownership of shares held by BitFlair beyond his 40% percentage interest therein. |
|
|
|
|
(5) |
Gabriel Abed sole voting and investment power over any shares owned by Abed Equities. |
|
|
|
|
(6) |
Ryan Ramnath and Sam Jorgenson have shared voting
and investment power over any shares owned by Bitflair Mining Corp. |
|
|
|
|
(7) |
Includes (i) 600,000 shares owned by Mr. Nelson, (ii) 2,505,000 shares beneficially owned by Coral Investment Partners, LP (“Coral”), as to which Mr. Nelson, in his capacity as owner of the general partner, has sole voting and investment power, consisting of (A) 1,505,000 shares owned by Coral, (B) 500,000 Class A Warrants owned by Coral which are immediately exercisable, and (C) 500,000 Class B Warrants owned by Coral which are immediately exercisable, (iii) 150,000 shares beneficially owned by Sterling Acquisitions 1, Inc., which is owned by Mr. Nelson, consisting of (X) 50,000 shares owned by Sterling, (Y) 50,000 Class A Warrants owned by Sterling, and (Z) 50,000 Class B Warrants owned by Sterling. Mr. Nelson disclaims beneficial ownership of shares held by Coral beyond his 40% ownership interest therein. |
|
|
|
|
(8) |
Includes (A) (i) 1,505,000 shares held outright, (ii) 500,000 Class A Warrants which are exercisable immediately, and (iii) 500,000 Class B Warrants which are exercisable immediately. Erik S. Nelson has sole voting and investment power of any shares owned by Coral Investment Partners, LP. |
|
|
|
|
(9) |
Includes 3,443,877 shares owned by BitFlair Mining Corp. (“BitFlair”), of which Mr. Ramnath has shared voting and investment power. Mr. Ramnath disclaims beneficial ownership of shares held by BitFlair beyond his percentage interest in Bitflair of 40%. |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS
AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The following is a description of transactions
since January 1, 2020 to which we were a party in which (i) the amount involved exceeded or will exceed the lesser of $120,000
of one percent (1%) of our average total assets at year-end for the last two completed fiscal years and (ii) any of our
directors, executive officers or holders of more than 5% of our capital stock, or any member of the immediate family of, or person sharing
the household with, any of the foregoing persons, who had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, other than equity and other
compensation, termination, change in control and other similar arrangements, which are described under “Executive and Director Compensation.”
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Starting in 2020, Coral Investment Partners, LP,
a partnership controlled by Erik Nelson, agreed to make loans to the Company from time to time pursuant to a demand promissory note that
bore interest at 24% per annum. The amount due at August 31, 2020 was principal of $50,447 and interest of $1,558. The amount due of principal
of $87,447 and interest of $19,476. was repaid in full in the quarter ended August 31, 2021.
On July 22, 2021, the Company entered into
the LOC Agreement with Innovative Digital Investors Emerging Technology, L.P. (“IDI”), a limited partnership controlled by
Jonathan Bates, our Chairman, and Raymond Mow, our chief financial officer and a director. The LOC Agreement was amended and restated
in its entirety on August 4, 2021, September 29, 2021, March 30, 2022 and June 24, 2022. On August 31, 2022, the Company and IDI agreed
to convert all amounts then due under the LOC Agreement into shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock with a stated value equal
to the principal and interest due under the LOC Agreement, which resulted in the issuance of 303,966 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
for $3,309,662 due thereunder.
On October 19, 2022, the
Company entered into a new Line of Credit Agreement (the “2022 LOC Agreement”) with IDI. The 2022 LOC Agreement provides
for loans of up to $1,000,000 at the request of the Company to finance the purchase of equipment necessary for the operation of the Company’s
business, and related working capital. Loans under the 2022 LOC Agreement accrue interest at twelve percent (12%) per annum, compounded
on a 30/360 monthly basis until the loans have been repaid in full. The Company has the right to submit draw requests under the 2022
LOC Agreement until April 15, 2023. Each draw request is subject to the approval of IDI in its sole discretion. The amount drawn, plus
all accrued interest therein, is repayable in full on December 1, 2023. As of November 4, 2022, the amount advanced under the 2022 LOC
Agreement was $400,000.
Indemnification of Officers and Directors
Our
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws require us to indemnify any officer and director who was or is a
party or is threatened to be made a party to or is involved in any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative
or investigative (hereinafter a “proceeding”), by reason of the fact that he or she, or a person of whom he or
she is the legal representative, is or was a director or officer of the corporation or is or was serving at the request of the corporation
as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, including
service with respect to employee benefit plans, to the fullest extent permitted by the laws of Delaware, provided however, that except
for any proceeding seeking to enforce or obtain payment under any right to indemnification by the corporation, the corporation shall
indemnify any such person seeking indemnification in connection with a proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by such person only if
the corporation has joined in or consented to the initiation of such proceeding (or part thereof).
Further, we may enter into indemnification agreements
with each of our directors and officers, and we may purchase a policy of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance that
insures our directors and officers against the cost of defense, settlement or payment of a judgment under certain circumstances. For further
information, see “Executive and Director Compensation — Limitations of Liability and Indemnification Matters.”
Policies with Respect to Transactions with Related
Persons
The board has adopted a Code of Ethics, which is
available at bitminetech.io, that sets forth various policies and procedures intended to promote the ethical behavior of the Company’s
employees, officers and directors. The Code of Ethics describes our policy on conflicts of interest.
The executive officers and the board are also required
to complete a questionnaire on an annual basis which requires them to disclose any related person transactions and potential conflicts
of interest. The responses to these questionnaires are reviewed by outside corporate counsel, and, if a transaction is reported by an
independent director or executive officer, the questionnaire is submitted to the Audit Committee, or the independent directors if there
is no Audit Committee. If necessary, the Audit Committee or the independent directors, as applicable, will determine whether the relationship
is material and will have any effect on the director’s independence. After making such determination, the Audit Committee or independent
directors, as applicable, will report its recommendation on whether the transaction should be approved or ratified by the entire board.
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
The following is a summary of the rights of
our common stock and preferred stock, certain provisions of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and our Bylaws and
applicable law. This summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by the provisions of our Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation and our Bylaws, copies of which have been filed as exhibits to the registration statement and are incorporated
by reference to our registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part.
Authorized Capital Stock
As of the date of this prospectus, our authorized
capital stock consists of 500,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and 20,000,000 shares of undesignated
preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share. Our authorized but unissued shares of common stock are available for issuance without further
action by our stockholders, unless such action is required by applicable law or the rules of any stock exchange or automated quotation
system on which our securities may be quoted or listed in the future.
Common Stock
As of the date of this prospectus, there were
48,548,091 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, and 9,500,800 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding
warrants.
Under the terms of our Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation, holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters submitted to
a vote of stockholders, including the election of directors, and do not have cumulative voting rights. The holders of outstanding shares
of common stock are entitled to receive dividends out of assets or funds legally available for the payment of dividends of such times
and in such amounts as our board of directors from time to time may determine. Our common stock is not entitled to pre-emptive rights
and is not subject to conversion or redemption. Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our company, the assets legally available
for distribution to stockholders are distributable ratably among the holders of our common stock after payment of liquidation preferences,
if any, on any outstanding payment of other claims of creditors.
Preferred Stock
As of the date of this prospectus, our board
of directors had authorized the issuance of one series of preferred stock, the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series
A Preferred”), for 500,000 shares, of which 453,996 had been issued. Below is a summary of the rights and privileges of the Series
A Preferred:
Dividends: Each share
of Series A Preferred is entitled to receive non-cumulative dividends equal to the amount of dividends that the holder of such share would
have received if such share of Series A Preferred were converted into shares of common stock immediately prior to the record date of the
dividend declared on the common stock.
Liquidation Preference:
The Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to receive, prior to any distribution to any junior class of securities, an amount equal to $10
per share, plus any accrued but unpaid dividends, as a liquidation preference before any distribution may be made to the holders of any
junior security, including the common stock.
Voting Rights: Each holder
of Series A Preferred Stock shall vote with holders of the common stock upon any matter submitted to a vote of shareholders, in which
event it shall have the number of votes equal to the number of shares of common stock into which such share of Series A Preferred Stock
would be convertible on the record date for the vote or consent of shareholders. Each holder of Series A Preferred Stock shall also be
entitled to one vote per share on each submitted to a class vote of the holders of Series A Preferred Stock.
Directors: The Series
A Preferred Stock has the exclusive right to nominate and vote on two (2) members of the board of directors.
Voluntary Conversion Rights:
Each share of Series A Preferred Stock is convertible into that number of shares of common stock equal to the liquidation preference of
the Series A Preferred divided by a conversion price of $0.575 per share.
Rank: The Series A Preferred
ranks senior to the common stock and any other class or series of preferred stock that may be authorized.
Redemption by Company:
The Company may redeem all of the Series A Preferred at any time on twenty days notice by payment of the liquidation preference of the
Series A Preferred.
Redemption by the Holders:
Any holder of Series A Preferred may request that some or all of its Series A Preferred be redeemed to the extent of 30% of the liquid
net assets of the Company in excess of $2 million. To the extent any holder requests redemption under this provision, the Company is required
to send a notice to all other Series A Preferred holders, who will be entitled to request redemption of some or all of their shares as
well. Each holder is required to redeem at least the lesser of 10,000 shares or the number of shares of Series A Preferred held by the
holder.
Redemption on Fundamental
Transaction: In the event the Company engages in a fundamental transaction, a majority of the holders of Series A Preferred may require
the Company to redeem all of the Series A Preferred at the closing of the transaction.
Right to Participate in Future
Fundings: Each holder of Series A Preferred has the right to participate in future capital raising transactions to the extent of its
proportionate ownership of the Company on an as converted basis. The right extents to any issuance of common or preferred stock or debt
securities convertible into common or preferred stock, except for certain exempted transactions.
Anti-Dilution Protection:
The conversion price of the Series A Preferred is subject to reduction to the extent the company issues shares of common stock at a purchase
price less than the then current conversion price, (ii) debt or equity securities convertible into common stock at a conversion price
less than the then current conversion price, (iii) options or warrants exercisable for common stock at an exercise price less than the
then current conversion price, or (iv) options or warrants to purchase convertible debt or equity securities, where the combined exercise
and conversion prices would enable the holder to acquire shares of common stock for less than the then current conversion price.
Options
As of the date of this prospectus, we did not have
any outstanding options to purchase common stock.
Warrants
As of the date of this prospectus, we had issued
590,000 Class A Warrants, 590,000 Class B Warrants, 4,147,600 Class C-1 Warrants, 4,147,600 Class C-2 Warrants, and 25,600 Class C-3 Warrants.
Anti-Takeover Provisions of Delaware Law and
Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws
Section 203 of the DGCL prohibits many Delaware
corporations from engaging in any business combination with any interested stockholder for a period of three years after the date
that such stockholder became an interested stockholder, unless the transaction was approved by the board and/or shareholders in the manner
specified in the statute. We are not subject to Section 203 of the DGCL because our common stock is not listed on a national securities
exchange or held of record by more than 2,000 shareholders. Furthermore, our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation does
contain a provision whereby we expressly elect to be governed by Section 203.
Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation,
Bylaws and Certificate of Designation for our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred”) contain a number
of provisions that could prevent or delay a potential takeover of the Company, such as:
| · | providing
that the authorized number of directors may be changed only by resolution of our board of
directors and with the consent of the holders of our Series A Preferred; |
| | |
| · | providing that a
director may only be removed with cause or without cause by the holders of at least a majority
of our then-outstanding shares of the capital stock entitled to vote generally at an
election of directors; |
| | |
| · | providing
that the holders of our Series A Preferred are entitled to nominate and elect two directors,
and that such holders are entitled to vote on all other directors on an as-converted basis;
|
| | |
| · | providing
that all vacancies, including newly created directorships, may, except as otherwise required
by law, be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of directors then in office, even
if less than a quorum; |
| | |
| · | providing
that a special meeting of our stockholders may be called only by the chairman of our board
of directors, our chief executive officer or a majority of our board of directors; |
| | |
| · | by
not providing for cumulative voting rights, therefore allowing the holders of a majority
of the shares of common stock entitled to vote in any election of directors to elect all
of the directors standing for election, if they should so choose; |
| | |
| · | by
providing that our bylaws may only by amended or repealed by the vote of 75% of our outstanding
shares if our board of directors does not approve the amendment; |
| | |
| · | by
providing that certain provisions of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
may only by amended or repealed by the vote of 75% of our outstanding shares; |
| | |
| · | by
providing that the following actions may not be taken by the Company without the approval
of a majority of the outstanding shares of Series A Preferred: |
| o | increase the size of the board of directors; |
| o | increase or decrease the authorized number of shares of common stock; |
| o | merge or consolidate into or with any other corporation or sell, assign, lease, pledge, encumber or otherwise
dispose (including by exclusive license or otherwise) of all or substantially all of its assets or those of any subsidiary; |
| o | create or commit the Corporation to enter into a joint venture, licensing agreement or exclusive marketing
or other distribution agreement with respect to the Corporation’s products, other than in the ordinary course
of business; |
| o | cease to engage in a business that is substantially similar to the business engaged in, or contemplated to
be engaged in, as of the date of creation of the Series A Preferred. |
The amendment of any of these provisions would
require approval of the vote of a majority of the board of directors or the vote of at least a majority of the issued and outstanding
common stock.
The combination of these provisions may make it
more difficult for our existing stockholders to replace our board of directors as well as for another party to obtain control of us by
replacing our board of directors. Because our board of directors has the power to retain and discharge our officers, these provisions
could also make it more difficult for existing stockholders or another party to effect a change in management. In addition, the authorization
of undesignated preferred stock makes it possible for our board of directors to issue preferred stock with voting or other rights or preferences
that could impede the success of any attempt to change our control.
These provisions are intended to enhance the likelihood
of continued stability in the composition of our board of directors and its policies and to discourage coercive takeover practices and
inadequate takeover bids. These provisions are also designed to reduce our vulnerability to hostile takeovers and to discourage certain
tactics that may be used in proxy fights. However, such provisions could have the effect of discouraging others from making tender offers
for our shares and may have the effect of delaying changes in our control or management. As a consequence, these provisions may also inhibit
fluctuations in the market price of our stock that could result from actual or rumored takeover attempts. We believe that the benefits
of these provisions, including increased protection of our potential ability to negotiate with the proponent of an unfriendly or unsolicited
proposal to acquire or restructure our company, outweigh the disadvantages of discouraging takeover proposals, because negotiation of
takeover proposals could result in an improvement of their terms.
Limitation on Liability and Indemnification
See the section titled “Executive and Director
Compensation — Limitation on Liability and Indemnification Matters.”
Listing
Our common stock is quoted on Pink OTC Market
under the trading symbol “BMNR.”
Transfer Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our common
stock is West Coast Transfer, Inc. The Transfer Agent’s address is 721 N. Vulcan Ave. First Floor, Encinitas, CA 92024.
SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
The Placement Shares and the Warrant Shares being
offered by the Selling Stockholders are those previously issued to the selling shareholders in the Private Offering. We are registering
the Placement Shares and the Warrant Shares in order to permit the selling stockholders to offer the shares for resale from time to time.
Except for the ownership of the shares of common stock, the selling stockholders have not had any material relationship with us within
the past three years.
The table below lists the Selling Stockholders
and other information regarding the beneficial ownership of the shares of common stock by each of the Selling Stockholders. The second
column lists the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by each Selling Stockholder, based on its ownership of the shares
of common stock and Warrants, as of November 4, 2022, assuming exercise of the Warrants held by the Selling Stockholders on that
date, without regard to any limitations on exercises. The third column lists the total number of shares being offered by this prospectus
by the Selling Stockholders, including any shares of common stock currently owned by the Selling Stockholder and any shares of common
stock issuable upon exercise of any Warrants held by the Selling Stockholder. The fourth column shows the number of shares of common
stock that would still be owned by the Selling Stockholder assuming the sale of all of the shares offered by the Selling Stockholders
pursuant to this prospectus, and the fifty column shows the percentage ownership of such remaining shares.
The table is based on information supplied to
us by the Selling Stockholders, with beneficial ownership and percentage ownership determined in accordance with the rules and regulations
of the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect to shares of common stock. This information does not necessarily indicate
beneficial ownership for any other purpose. In computing the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by a Selling Stockholder
and the percentage ownership of that Selling Stockholder, shares of common stock subject to warrants held by that Selling Stockholder
that are exercisable for shares of common stock within 60 days after November 4, 2022, are deemed outstanding. Such shares,
however, are not deemed outstanding for the purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other stockholder.
Name of Selling Shareholder | |
Number of shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned Prior to Offering(1) | | |
Maximum Number of Shares to be Sold Pursuant to this Prospectus(1) | | |
Number of shares of Common Stock Owned After Offering(2) | | |
Percentage Beneficially Owned After
Offering(3) | |
Derek Leffler | |
| 300,000 | | |
| 300,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Scott Walker | |
| 600,000 | | |
| 600,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Natacha Furlan | |
| 300,000 | | |
| 300,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Michael Fentress | |
| 120,000 | | |
| 120,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Toalei Talataina | |
| 120,000 | | |
| 120,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Edward Stoughton | |
| 300,000 | | |
| 300,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Robert B. Katz | |
| 24,000 | | |
| 24,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
The Banksy Trust | |
| 504,000 | | |
| 504,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Jonathan Jacobs | |
| 120,000 | | |
| 120,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Howard Schraub | |
| 150,000 | | |
| 150,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Erik H. Smith | |
| 60,000 | | |
| 60,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Jason Tyler Green | |
| 120,000 | | |
| 120,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Arosa Investments, LTD | |
| 480,000 | | |
| 480,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Brian Polan | |
| 60,000 | | |
| 60,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Revocable Trust of Douglas W.K. Chee Dated July 20, 1998 | |
| 72,000 | | |
| 72,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Steve Simon | |
| 60,000 | | |
| 60,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Krueger Family Trust | |
| 120,000 | | |
| 120,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Rykor Energy Solutions LLC | |
| 8,016,000 | | |
| 8,016,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Dean Delis Trust | |
| 240,000 | | |
| 240,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Ionic Ventures LLC | |
| 600,000 | | |
| 600,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Sutter Securities, Inc. (4) | |
| 83,040 | | |
| 23,040 | | |
| 60,000 | | |
| – | |
Michael R. Jacks (4) | |
| 218,760 | | |
| 218,760 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Michael Chermak | |
| 500,000 | | |
| 500,000 | | |
| | | |
| | |
Dean Sutton | |
| 500,000 | | |
| 500,000 | | |
| | | |
| | |
Coral Investment Partners, LP (5) | |
| 2,505,000 | | |
| 1,000,000 | | |
| 1,505,000 | | |
| 3.1 | |
Sterling Acquisitions 1, Inc. (6) | |
| 150,000 | | |
| 150,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Michael Littman (7) | |
| 20,000 | | |
| 20,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Candice Chilcote | |
| 10,000 | | |
| 10,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
David Natan (8) | |
| 10,000 | | |
| 10,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Chris Moore | |
| 20,000 | | |
| 20,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Joanne Majerus | |
| 10,000 | | |
| 10,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Philip Grey | |
| 10,000 | | |
| 10,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Kristin Nelson-Dorrance | |
| 10,000 | | |
| 10,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Steve Stephens | |
| 10,000 | | |
| 10,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Paul Eric Flesche | |
| 10,000 | | |
| 10,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
_________
(1) The
number of shares is based upon the number of shares of our common stock held by each selling stockholder and the number of shares issuable
to the selling stockholder upon the full exercise of the Warrants held by each selling stockholder based upon information supplied by
the selling stockholder.
(2) Assumes
that all securities registered with this offering will be sold.
(3) Percentages
are based on 48,548,091 shares of common stock outstanding as of November ___, 2022.
(4) Sutter
Securities, Inc. acts as financial adviser to the Company pursuant to a Placement Agent and Advisory Services Agreement. Michael R. Jacks
is a registered representative with Sutter Securities, Inc.
(5) Coral
Investment Partners, LP is an investment fund managed by an entity owned by Erik S. Nelson, who is the Company’s President and a
director.
(6) Sterling
Acquisitions 1, Inc. is owned by Erik S. Nelson, who is the Company’s President and a director.
(7) Michael
Littman is a former attorney for the Company.
(8) David
Nathan performs accounting services for the Company as an independent contractor.
We do not know when or in what amounts a selling
stockholder may offer shares for sale. The selling stockholders might not sell any or might sell all of the shares offered by this prospectus.
Because the selling stockholders may offer all or some of the shares pursuant to this offering, and because there are currently no agreements,
arrangements or understandings with respect to the sale of any of the shares, we cannot estimate the number of the shares that will be
held by the Selling Stockholders after completion of the offering. However, for purposes of this table, we have assumed that, after completion
of the offering, none of the shares covered by this prospectus will be held by the selling stockholders, including common stock issuable
upon exercise of the Warrants issued in the Private Placement.
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
Each Selling Stockholder (the “Selling
Stockholders”) of the securities and any of their pledgees, assignees and successors-in-interest may, from time to
time, sell any or all of their securities covered hereby on the Pink OTC Market or any other stock exchange, market or trading
facility on which the securities are traded or in private transactions. These sales may be at fixed or negotiated prices. A Selling
Stockholder may use any one or more of the following methods when selling securities:
• ordinary
brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits purchasers;
• block
trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the securities as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block
as principal to facilitate the transaction;
• purchases
by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account;
• an
exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange;
• privately
negotiated transactions;
• settlement
of short sales;
• in
transactions through broker-dealers that agree with the Selling Stockholders to sell a specified number of such securities at a stipulated
price per security;
• through
the writing or settlement of options or other hedging transactions, whether through an options exchange or otherwise;
• a
combination of any such methods of sale; or
• any
other method permitted pursuant to applicable law.
The Selling Stockholders may also sell securities
under Rule 144 or any other exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities
Act”), if available, rather than under this prospectus.
Broker-dealers engaged by the Selling Stockholders
may arrange for other brokers-dealers to participate in sales. Broker-dealers may receive commissions or discounts from the
Selling Stockholders (or, if any broker-dealer acts as agent for the purchaser of securities, from the purchaser) in amounts to be
negotiated, but, except as set forth in a supplement to this Prospectus, in the case of an agency transaction not in excess of a customary
brokerage commission in compliance with FINRA Rule 2121; and in the case of a principal transaction a markup or markdown in compliance
with FINRA Rule 2121.
In connection with the sale of the securities or
interests therein, the Selling Stockholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions,
which may in turn engage in short sales of the securities in the course of hedging the positions they assume. The Selling Stockholders
may also sell securities short and deliver these securities to close out their short positions, or loan or pledge the securities to broker-dealers that
in turn may sell these securities. The Selling Stockholders may also enter into option or other transactions with broker-dealers or
other financial institutions or create one or more derivative securities which require the delivery to such broker-dealer or other
financial institution of securities offered by this prospectus, which securities such broker-dealer or other financial institution
may resell pursuant to this prospectus (as supplemented or amended to reflect such transaction).
The Selling Stockholders and any broker-dealers or
agents that are involved in selling the securities may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities
Act in connection with such sales. In such event, any commissions received by such broker-dealers or agents and any profit on the
resale of the securities purchased by them may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act. Each Selling
Stockholder has informed the Company that it does not have any written or oral agreement or understanding, directly or indirectly, with
any person to distribute the securities.
The Company is required to pay certain fees and
expenses incurred by the Company incident to the registration of the securities.
We agreed to keep this prospectus effective until
all of the securities have been sold pursuant to this prospectus or Rule 144 under the Securities Act or any other rule of similar
effect. The resale securities will be sold only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers if required under applicable state securities
laws. In addition, in certain states, the resale securities covered hereby may not be sold unless they have been registered or qualified
for sale in the applicable state or an exemption from the registration or qualification requirement is available and is complied with.
Under applicable rules and regulations under the
Exchange Act, any person engaged in the distribution of the resale securities may not simultaneously engage in market making activities
with respect to the common stock for the applicable restricted period, as defined in Regulation M, prior to the commencement of the
distribution. In addition, the Selling Stockholders will be subject to applicable provisions of the Exchange Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder, including Regulation M, which may limit the timing of purchases and sales of the common stock by the Selling
Stockholders or any other person. We will make copies of this prospectus available to the Selling Stockholders and have informed them
of the need to deliver a copy of this prospectus to each purchaser at or prior to the time of the sale (including by compliance with Rule 172
under the Securities Act).
LEGAL MATTERS
Davis Gillett Mottern & Sims, LLC, Atlanta,
Georgia, is acting as counsel in connection with the registration of our securities under the Securities Act, and as such, will pass upon
the validity of the securities offered in this prospectus.
EXPERTS
The financial statements of Bitmine Immersion Technologies,
Inc. as of and for the years ended August 31, 2021 and 2020 included in this registration statement, of which this prospectus forms
a part, have been audited by BF Borgers CPA PC, independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in their report appearing
elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance upon such report given on the authority of such firm as experts in auditing and accounting
in giving said report.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE
INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement
on Form S-1 under the Securities Act with respect to the common stock offered in this prospectus. This prospectus, which constitutes
a part of the registration statement, does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement and its exhibits
and schedules, portions of which have been omitted as permitted by the rules and regulations of the SEC. For further information
about us and our common stock, we refer you to the registration statement and to its exhibits and schedules. Statements in this prospectus
about the contents of any contract, agreement or other document are not necessarily complete and, in each instance, we refer you to the
copy of such contract, agreement or document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, with each such statement being qualified
in all respects by reference to the document to which it refers. Anyone may inspect and copy the registration statement and its exhibits
and schedules at the Public Reference Room the SEC maintains at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain further information
about the operation of the SEC’s Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. You may also inspect the registration
statement and its exhibits and schedules and other information without charge at the website maintained by the SEC. The address of
this site is www.sec.gov.
We also file periodic reports, proxy statements
and other information with the SEC. These reports, proxy statements and other information will be available for inspection and copying
at the public reference room and website of the SEC referred to above. We also maintain a website at bitminetech.io, by which
you may access these materials free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished
to, the SEC. The information that is contained on, or that may be accessed through, our website is not a part of this prospectus.
We have included our website in this prospectus solely as an inactive textual reference.
BITMINE IMMERSION TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc.
Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
| |
May 31, | | |
August 31, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
ASSETS | |
| | | |
| | |
Current assets: | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash and cash equivalents | |
$ | 499,912 | | |
$ | 218,737 | |
Other receivable | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Subscriptions receivable | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Notes receivable | |
| 168,750 | | |
| – | |
Accounts receivable - other | |
| 6,680 | | |
| – | |
Prepaid expenses | |
| 29,228 | | |
| – | |
Total current assets | |
| 721,936 | | |
| 218,737 | |
Cryptocurrencies | |
| 17,366 | | |
| – | |
Fixed assets - not in service | |
| 2,688,306 | | |
| 427,296 | |
Total assets | |
$ | 3,410,242 | | |
$ | 646,033 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | |
| | | |
| | |
Current liabilities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Accounts payable | |
$ | 72,610 | | |
$ | 3,680 | |
Accrued liabilities - related party | |
| 102,792 | | |
| – | |
Accrued interest - related party | |
| 200,670 | | |
| 4,505 | |
Loans payable-related party | |
| 1,894,109 | | |
| 277,296 | |
Total current liabilities | |
| 2,270,181 | | |
| 285,481 | |
Total liabilities | |
| 2,270,181 | | |
| 285,481 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Commitments and contingencies | |
| – | | |
| – | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Stockholders' Equity: | |
| | | |
| | |
Common stock, $0.0001
par value, 500,000,000
shares authorized; 44,086,091
and 40,433,399
issued and outstanding as of May 31, 2022 and August 31, 2021 respectively | |
| 4,409 | | |
| 4,043 | |
Additional paid-in capital | |
| 2,904,781 | | |
| 817,842 | |
Retained earnings deficit | |
| (1,769,129 | ) | |
| (461,334 | ) |
Total stockholders' equity | |
| 1,140,061 | | |
| 360,551 | |
Total liabilities and equity | |
$ | 3,410,242 | | |
$ | 646,033 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
Bitmine Immersion Technologies,
Inc.
Statements
of Operations
(Unaudited)
| |
Three months | | |
Three months | | |
Nine months | | |
Nine months | |
| |
ended | | |
ended | | |
ended | | |
ended | |
| |
May 31, | | |
May 31, | | |
May 31, | | |
May 31, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | | |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
Revenue from the sale of mining equipment | |
$ | – | | |
$ | – | | |
$ | 344,700 | | |
$ | – | |
Revenue from
hosting, net | |
| 16,567 | | |
| – | | |
| 16,567 | | |
| – | |
Revenue from mining | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| 4,574 | | |
| – | |
Total revenue | |
| 16,567 | | |
| – | | |
| 365,841 | | |
| – | |
Cost of sales mining equipment | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| 186,657 | | |
| – | |
Cost of sales for mining and hosting | |
| 99,711 | | |
| – | | |
| 145,179 | | |
| – | |
Total cost of sales | |
| 99,711 | | |
| – | | |
| 331,836 | | |
| – | |
Gross profit | |
| (83,144 | ) | |
| – | | |
| 34,005 | | |
| – | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Operating expenses: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
General and administrative expenses | |
| 141,312 | | |
| – | | |
| 189,982 | | |
| – | |
Professional fees | |
| 75,705 | | |
| 13,555 | | |
| 742,730 | | |
| 36,114 | |
Related party compensation | |
| 109,172 | | |
| – | | |
| 213,633 | | |
| 500 | |
Impairment of cryptocurrency | |
| 3,775 | | |
| – | | |
| 3,775 | | |
| – | |
Total operating expenses | |
| 329,964 | | |
| 13,555 | | |
| 1,150,119 | | |
| 36,614 | |
Income (loss) from operations | |
| (413,108 | ) | |
| (13,555 | ) | |
| (1,116,115 | ) | |
| (36,614 | ) |
Other income (expense) | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Interest expense | |
| (78,290 | ) | |
| (6,386 | ) | |
| (196,165 | ) | |
| (14,672 | ) |
Interest income | |
| 4,485 | | |
| – | | |
| 4,485 | | |
| – | |
Other income (expense), net | |
| (73,805 | ) | |
| (6,386 | ) | |
| (191,680 | ) | |
| (14,672 | ) |
Net loss | |
| (486,912 | ) | |
| (19,941 | ) | |
| (1,307,795 | ) | |
| (51,286 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Basic loss per common share | |
$ | (0.01 | ) | |
$ | (0.01 | ) | |
$ | (0.03 | ) | |
$ | (0.02 | ) |
Diluted loss per common share | |
$ | (0.01 | ) | |
$ | (0.01 | ) | |
$ | (0.03 | ) | |
$ | (0.02 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding: Basic | |
| 43,712,529 | | |
| 2,803,400 | | |
| 41,910,194 | | |
| 2,688,400 | |
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding: Diluted | |
| 43,712,529 | | |
| 2,803,400 | | |
| 41,910,194 | | |
| 2,688,400 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
Bitmine Immersion Technologies,
Inc.
Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
(Unaudited)
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | |
| | |
Additional | | |
| | |
Total | |
| |
Common Stock | | |
Paid-in | | |
Retained | | |
Stockholders’ | |
| |
Shares | | |
Value | | |
Capital | | |
Earnings | | |
Equity | |
Balance, August 31, 2020 | |
| 2,688,400 | | |
$ | 269 | | |
$ | 256,751 | | |
$ | (307,095 | ) | |
$ | (50,075 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| (20,976 | ) | |
| (20,976 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Balance, November 30, 2020 | |
| 2,688,400 | | |
$ | 269 | | |
$ | 256,751 | | |
$ | (328,071 | ) | |
$ | (71,051 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| (10,368 | ) | |
| (10,368 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Balance, February 28, 2021 | |
| 2,688,400 | | |
$ | 269 | | |
$ | 256,751 | | |
$ | (338,439 | ) | |
$ | (81,419 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Proceeds from private placement | |
| 115,000 | | |
| 12 | | |
| 1,139 | | |
| – | | |
| 1,150 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| (19,941 | ) | |
| (19,941 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Balance, May 31, 2021 | |
| 2,803,400 | | |
$ | 281 | | |
$ | 257,890 | | |
$ | (358,380 | ) | |
$ | (100,210 | ) |
Bitmine Immersion Technologies,
Inc.
Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
(Unaudited)
| |
| | |
| | |
Additional | | |
| | |
Total | |
| |
Common Stock | | |
Paid-in | | |
Retained | | |
Stockholders' | |
| |
Shares | | |
Value | | |
Capital | | |
Earnings | | |
Equity | |
Balance, August 31, 2021 | |
| 40,433,399 | | |
$ | 4,043 | | |
$ | 817,842 | | |
$ | (461,334 | ) | |
$ | 360,551 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| (708,756 | ) | |
| (708,756 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Common shares issued for services | |
| 200,000 | | |
| 20 | | |
| 549,980 | | |
| – | | |
| 550,000 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Balance, November 30, 2021 | |
| 40,633,399 | | |
$ | 4,063 | | |
$ | 1,367,822 | | |
$ | (1,170,090 | ) | |
$ | 201,796 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Common shares issued for services | |
| 2,100,000 | | |
| 210 | | |
| (210 | ) | |
| – | | |
| – | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Common shares sold in a private placement | |
| 580,000 | | |
| 58 | | |
| 724,942 | | |
| – | | |
| 725,000 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Stock-based compensation -related party | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| 15,460 | | |
| – | | |
| 15,460 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| (112,127 | ) | |
| (112,127 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Balance, February 28, 2022 | |
| 43,313,399 | | |
$ | 4,331 | | |
$ | 2,108,014 | | |
$ | (1,282,217 | ) | |
$ | 830,129 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| (486,912 | ) | |
| (486,912 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Common shares issued for services | |
| 200,000 | | |
| 20 | | |
| 87,944 | | |
| – | | |
| 87,964 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Common shares sold in a private placement | |
| 530,000 | | |
| 53 | | |
| 662,447 | | |
| – | | |
| 662,500 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Stock based compensation -related party | |
| 42,692 | | |
| 4 | | |
| 46,377 | | |
| – | | |
| 46,381 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Balance, May 31, 2022 | |
| 44,086,091 | | |
$ | 4,409 | | |
$ | 2,904,781 | | |
$ | (1,769,129 | ) | |
$ | 1,140,061 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements
Bitmine
Immersion Technologies, Inc.
Statements
of Cash Flows
| |
Nine months | | |
Nine months | |
| |
ended | | |
ended | |
| |
May 31, | | |
May 31, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
Cash flows from operating activities | |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss | |
$ | (1,307,795 | ) | |
$ | (51,286 | ) |
Stock based compensation | |
| 699,805 | | |
| – | |
Depreciation | |
| 7,803 | | |
| – | |
Change in balance sheet accounts | |
| | | |
| | |
Cryptocurrencies | |
| (17,366 | ) | |
| – | |
Accounts receivable other | |
| (6,680 | ) | |
| – | |
Notes receivable | |
| (168,750 | ) | |
| – | |
Prepaid expenses | |
| (29,228 | ) | |
| – | |
Accounts payable | |
| 68,927 | | |
| – | |
Accrued liabilities - related parties | |
| 102,792 | | |
| – | |
Accrued interest - related parties | |
| 196,165 | | |
| 14,672 | |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | |
| (454,327 | ) | |
| (36,614 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash flows from investing activities | |
| | | |
| | |
Purchase of fixed assets | |
| (2,268,811 | ) | |
| – | |
Net cash used in investing activities | |
| (2,268,811 | ) | |
| – | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Common shares sold in a private placement | |
| 1,387,500 | | |
| 1,150 | |
Related party loans - net | |
| 1,616,813 | | |
| 37,000 | |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | |
| 3,004,313 | | |
| 38,150 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | |
| 281,175 | | |
| 1,536 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | |
| 218,737 | | |
| 1,930 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | |
$ | 499,912 | | |
$ | 3,466 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash paid for interest | |
$ | – | | |
$ | – | |
Cash paid for income taxes | |
$ | – | | |
$ | – | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
BITMINE IMMERSION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT POLICIES
About Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc.
Bitmine Immersion Technologies Inc. f/k/a Sandy
Springs Holdings, Inc. (“Bitmine” or the “Company”) is a Delaware corporation that commenced operations
on July 16, 2020. A predecessor to the Company was incorporated in the state of Nevada on August 16, 1995, as Interactive Lighting Showrooms,
Inc.
By a written consent dated July 16, 2021, holders
of a majority of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock approved a resolution to appoint Jonathan Bates, Raymond Mow,
Michael Maloney, and Seth Bayles to the board of directors of the Company, and to appoint Jonathan Bates as Chairman, Seth Bayles as
Corporate Secretary, Raymond Mow as Chief Financial Officer, and Ryan Ramnath as Chief Operating Officer (collectively, the “New
O&Ds”). Erik S. Nelson remained a director and the chief executive officer. At the same time, the shareholders approved
the issuance of 32,994,999 shares of common stock in the Company’s offering of common stock at $0.015 per share, and the grant
of 4,750,000 shares for services, which were valued at $0.015 per share. As a result of the foregoing stock issuances, the New O&Ds
(or entities controlled by them) collectively acquired 24,893,877 shares of common stock, which represented approximately 62% of the
issued and outstanding shares at the time.
The appointment of certain of the New O&Ds
to the Company’s board, and issuance to the New O&Ds of a controlling interest in the Company, were made in order to enable
the Company to enter the business of creating a hosting center for Bitcoin mining computers primarily utilizing immersion cooling
technology, as well mining the Bitcoin digital currency for its own account. Prior to the change of control to the New O&Ds, the Company
was a shell company.
During the nine months ended May 31, 2022, the
Company began implementing its business plan by generating revenue from the mining of Bitcoin digital currency and the sale of mining
equipment.
The Company’s year-end is August 31st.
Basis of Presentation
The foregoing unaudited interim condensed financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”)
for interim financial information and with the instructions for Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange
Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, these financial statements do not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP
for complete financial statements. These unaudited interim condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited
financial statements and the notes thereto included on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2021. In the opinion of management, the
unaudited interim condensed financial statements furnished herein include all adjustments, all of which are of a normal recurring nature,
necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim period presented.
The preparation of financial statements in accordance
with GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities known to exist as of the date the financial statements are published, and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are inherent in the preparation of
the Company’s financial statements; accordingly, it is possible that the actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions
that could have a material effect on the reported amounts of the Company’s financial position and results of operations.
Operating results for the nine months ended May
31, 2022, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending August 31, 2022.
Reverse Stock Split
On June 25, 2020, the Board of Directors and the
shareholders of the Company approved a 1 for 40,000 reverse split, with all fractional shares rounded up to the nearest whole share, and
immediately after the completion of the reverse split, effected a 200 for 1 forward stock split. The net effect of the splits was a 1
for 200 reverse split of the Company’s common shares. The stock splits were effective April 27, 2021. No fractional shares of common
stock were issued connection with the Reverse Split. If, as a result of the Reverse Split, a shareholder would have otherwise held a fractional
share, the shareholder received, instead of the issuance of such fractional share, one whole share of common stock.
The Company’s financial statements in this
Report for the periods ended May 31, 2022, and August 31, 2021, and all references thereto have been retroactively adjusted to reflect
the split unless specifically stated otherwise.
Management’s Representation of Interim
Financial Statements
The accompanying unaudited condensed financial
statements have been prepared by the Company without audit pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”). The Company uses the same accounting policies in preparing quarterly and annual financial statements. Certain information
and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted as allowed by such rules and regulations, and management believes
that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These condensed financial statements include all of
the adjustments, which in the opinion of management are necessary to a fair presentation of financial position and results of operations.
All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements
in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. The most significant estimates relate to the
calculation of stock-based compensation, useful lives and recoverability of long-lived assets, income taxes and contingencies. The Company
bases its estimates on historical experience, known or expected trends, and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable
given the quality of information available as of the date of these financial statements. The results of these assumptions provide the
basis for making estimates about the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual
results could differ from these estimates. There have been no material changes to the Company’s accounting estimates since
the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2021.
Segment Reporting
The Company operates in one segment - the
cryptocurrency mining industry. In accordance with the “Segment Reporting” Topic of the ASC, the Company’s chief operating
decision maker has been identified as the Chief Executive Officer and President, who reviews operating results to make decisions about
allocating resources and assessing performance for the entire Company. All material Company operations qualify for aggregation due to
their similar customer base and similarities in economic characteristics, nature of products and services, and procurement, manufacturing
and distribution processes.
Revenue Recognition
On July 1, 2018, the Company adopted Accounting
Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). Results for reporting
periods beginning after January 1, 2018, are presented under ASC 606.
Revenues
from digital currency mining
The Company
recognizes revenue under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The core principle of the revenue standard is that a company
should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration
to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The following five steps are applied to achieve
that core principle:
· Step
1: Identify the contract with the customer;
· Step
2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract;
· Step
3: Determine the transaction price;
· Step
4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and
· Step
5: Recognize revenue when the Company satisfies a performance obligation.
In order
to identify the performance obligations in a contract with a customer, a company must assess the promised goods or services in the contract
and identify each promised good or service that is distinct. A performance obligation meets ASC 606’s definition of a “distinct”
good or service (or bundle of goods or services) if both of the following criteria are met: The customer can benefit from the good or
service either on its own or together with other resources that are readily available to the customer (i.e., the good or service is capable
of being distinct), and the entity’s promise to transfer the good or service to the customer is separately identifiable from other
promises in the contract (i.e., the promise to transfer the good or service is distinct within the context of the contract).
If a good
or service is not distinct, the good or service is combined with other promised goods or services until a bundle of goods or services
is identified that is distinct.
The transaction
price is the amount of consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods or services
to a customer. The consideration promised in a contract with a customer may include fixed amounts, variable amounts, or both. When determining
the transaction price, an entity must consider the effects of all of the following:
|
• |
Variable consideration |
|
• |
Constraining estimates of variable consideration |
|
• |
The existence of a significant financing component
in the contract |
|
• |
Noncash consideration |
|
• |
Consideration payable to a customer |
Variable
consideration is included in the transaction price only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of
cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved.
The transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation on a relative standalone selling price basis. The transaction price
allocated to each performance obligation is recognized when that performance obligation is satisfied, at a point in time or over time
as appropriate.
The Company
has entered into digital asset mining pools by executing contracts, as amended from time to time, with the mining pool operators to provide
computing power to the mining pool. The contracts are terminable at any time by either party and the Company’s enforceable right
to compensation only begins when the Company provides computing power to the mining pool operator. In exchange for providing computing
power, the Company is entitled to a fractional share of the fixed cryptocurrency award the mining pool operator receives (less digital
asset transaction fees to the mining pool operator which are immaterial and are recorded as a deduction from revenue), for successfully
adding a block to the blockchain. The terms of the agreement provide that neither party can dispute settlement terms after thirty-five
days following settlement. The Company’s fractional share is based on the proportion of computing power the Company contributed
to the mining pool operator to the total computing power contributed by all mining pool participants in solving the current algorithm.
Providing
computing power to solve complex cryptographic algorithms in support of the Bitcoin blockchain (in a process known as “solving
a block”) is an output of the Company’s ordinary activities. The provision of providing such computing power is the only
performance obligation in the Company’s contracts with mining pool operators. The transaction consideration the Company receives,
if any, is noncash consideration, which the Company measures at fair value on the date received, which is not materially different than
the fair value at contract inception or the time the Company has earned the award from the pools. The consideration is all variable.
Because it is not probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue will not occur, the consideration is constrained until the
mining pool operator successfully places a block (by being the first to solve an algorithm) and the Company receives confirmation of
the consideration it will receive, at which time revenue is recognized. There is no significant financing component in these transactions.
Fair value
of the cryptocurrency award received is determined using the market rate of the related cryptocurrency at the time of receipt.
Revenues from Hosting
The Company
provides energized space to customers who locate their equipment within the Company’s co-hosting facility. The equipment generating
the hosting revenue is owned by the customer. Currently, the Company accepts the mining proceeds daily from the mining pool into a cold
wallet address in the Company’s name. The Company sends its hosting client its portion daily, as the Company receives such proceeds.
All performance obligations are achieved simultaneously by providing the hosting environment for the customers’ operations.
Hosting revenues consist of amounts billed in U.S. dollars for electricity and other fees, and a percentage of cryptocurrency generated
by the client’s hosting activities. With regard to hosting revenues that are billed in U.S. dollars, revenues are recorded at the
time of invoicing. With regard to hosting revenues that are based on a percentage of cryptocurrency generated by the customer, revenues
are recorded based on the Company’s share of cryptocurrency received from the mining pool on the date of receipt.
During
the period ending May 31, 2022, all of the Company’s hosting revenue was derived from one hosting customer.
Revenues
from the sale of mining equipment
The Company
records revenue from the resale of mining equipment it has purchased. Revenue for the sale of mining equipment is recognized under the
guidelines of ASC 606.
Revenues
From Mining
Revenues
from mining cryptocurrency for its own account will be recorded at the spot price for the cryptocurrency on a daily basis based on the
Company’s proportionate share of cryptocurrency earned by the mining pools in which the Company participates on the date the Company
receives its share from the pool.
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid temporary
cash investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. On May 31, 2022, and August 31, 2021, respectively,
the Company’s cash equivalents totaled $499,912
and $218,737, respectively.
Cryptocurrency
Cryptocurrencies held are accounted for as intangible
assets with indefinite useful lives. An intangible asset with an indefinite useful life is not amortized but assessed for impairment
quarterly, when events or changes in circumstances occur indicating that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived asset is
impaired. Impairment exists when the carrying amount exceeds its fair value, which is measured using the quoted price of the cryptocurrency at
the time its fair value is being measured. In testing for impairment, the Company has the option to first perform a qualitative assessment
to determine whether it is more likely than not that an impairment exists. If it is determined that it is not more likely than not that
an impairment exists, a quantitative impairment test is not necessary. If the Company concludes otherwise, it is required to perform
a quantitative impairment test. To the extent an impairment loss is recognized, the loss establishes the new cost basis of the asset.
During the three months ended May 31, 2022, the company recorded an impairment charge of $3,775 due to a reduction in the quoted price
of cryptocurrency. Subsequent reversal of impairment losses, if the price of cryptocurrency increases is not permitted.
Cryptocurrency earned by the Company through
its mining activities are included within operating activities on the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows. The sales of
digital currencies are included within investing activities in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows and any realized
gains or losses from such sales are included in other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive
income (loss). The Company accounts for its gains or losses in accordance with the first in first out (“FIFO”) method of
accounting.
The Company
holds its cryptocurrencies in a cold storage wallet account in its name, and not with a custodian or other intermediary. The Company
has an account with Gemini Trust Company, LLC, which is a qualified custodian regulated by the New York Department of Financial Services.
Currently, the Company does not store cryptocurrencies at Gemini, and only transfers cryptocurrencies that it desires to liquidate to
its account at Gemini immediately prior to the liquidation. The Company uses Gemini’s multi-signature feature for account access.
Income taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB
ASC 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. Under FASB ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized
for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities
and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable
income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under FASB ASC 740, the effect on deferred
tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. FASB ASC 740-10-05,
“Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the
financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For those benefits to
be recognized, a tax position must be more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The amount recognized
is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company
assesses the validity of its conclusions regarding uncertain tax positions quarterly to determine if facts or circumstances have arisen
that might cause it to change its judgment regarding the likelihood of a tax position’s sustainability under audit.
Stock-based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation
using the fair value method following the guidance outlined in Section 718-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosure
about Stock-Based Compensation. This section requires a public entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for
an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). That cost will be recognized
over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award- the requisite service period (usually
the vesting period). No compensation cost is recognized for equity instruments for which employees do not render the requisite service.
Net Loss per Share
Net loss per common share is computed by dividing
net loss by the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period as defined by Financial Accounting Standards, ASC Topic 260,
“Earnings per Share.” Basic earnings per common share (“EPS”) calculations are determined by dividing net income
by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share calculations
are determined by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common share equivalents outstanding.
Stock Purchase
Warrants
The Company accounts for warrants issued to purchase
shares of its common stock as equity in accordance with FASB ASC 480, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to,
and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. We determine the accounting classification
of warrants we issue, as either liability or equity classified, by first assessing whether the warrants meet liability classification
in accordance with ASC 480-10, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity, then
in accordance with ASC 815-40, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s
Own Stock. Under ASC 480, warrants are considered liability classified if the warrants are mandatorily redeemable, obligate us to settle
the warrants or the underlying shares by paying cash or other assets, and warrants that must or may require settlement by issuing variable
number of shares. If warrants do not meet the liability classification under ASC 480-10, we assess the requirements under ASC 815-40,
which states that contracts that require or may require the issuer to settle the contract for cash are liabilities recorded at fair value,
irrespective of the likelihood of the transaction occurring that triggers the net cash settlement feature.
If the warrants do not require liability classification
under ASC 815-40, in order to conclude equity classification, we also assess whether the warrants are indexed to our common stock and
whether the warrants are classified as equity under ASC 815-40 or other GAAP. After all such assessments, we conclude whether the warrants
are classified as liability or equity. Liability classified warrants require fair value accounting at issuance and subsequent to initial
issuance with all changes in fair value after the issuance date recorded in the statements of operations. Equity classified warrants
only require fair value accounting at issuance with no changes recognized subsequent to the issuance date. We do not have any liability
classified warrants as of any period presented.
Property and equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated
using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Estimated useful lives for leasehold improvements are typically
the lesser of the estimated useful life of the asset or the life of the term of the lease. The estimated useful lives for all other property
and equipment are as follows:
Estimated useful lives |
|
|
Life (Years) |
|
Miners and mining equipment |
|
|
3 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
5-7 |
|
Office and computer equipment |
|
|
3 |
|
No depreciation is recorded on an asset until
it is placed in service. Due to the nature of the equipment, it can only be placed in service when the hosting site is properly configured
to turn on the machines. As of May 31, 2022, and August 31, 2021 had $2,688,306
and $427,296, respectively, of fixed
assets not in service. During the three months ended February 28, 2022 the Company placed $187,260
of mining equipment into service but did not record
any revenue from that equipment. However, since the equipment was placed in service the Company recorded $7,803
of depreciation on that equipment, and then subsequently sold the equipment to a third party on February 23, 2022 who agreed to
utilize the Company to host the equipment for a three-year term.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02,
Leases (Topic 842), which establishes a new lease accounting model for lessees. The updated guidance requires an entity to recognize
assets and liabilities arising from financing and operating leases, along with additional qualitative and quantitative disclosures. The
amended guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018, with early
adoption permitted. In March 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-01, Codification Improvements, which clarifies certain aspects of the
new lease standard. The FASB issued ASU 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases in July 2018. Also in 2018, the
FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842) Targeted Improvements, which provides an optional transition method whereby the new
lease standard is applied at the adoption date and recognized as an adjustment to retained earnings. The amendments have the same effective
date and transition requirements as the new lease standard.
We adopted ASC 842 on July 16, 2020. The adoption
of this guidance did not have any impact on our financial statements.
In March 2022, the SEC staff released Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 121 ("SAB 121"), which requires entities that hold crypto assets on behalf of platform users to recognize
a liability to reflect the entity’s obligation to safeguard the crypto assets held for its platform users, whether directly or
through an agent or another third party acting on its behalf, along with a corresponding safeguarding asset. Both the liability and corresponding
safeguarding asset shall be measured at fair value. SAB 121 also requires disclosure of the nature and amount of crypto assets
being safeguarded, how the fair value is determined, an entity’s accounting policy for safeguarding liabilities and corresponding
safeguarding assets, and may require disclosure of other information about risks and uncertainties arising from the entity’s safeguarding
activities. The Company is not in the business of holding its customer’s crypto assets for safekeeping. For crypto assets that
are not maintained on our platform and for which the Company does not maintain a private key or the ability to recover a customer’s
private key, these balances are not recorded, as there is no related safeguarding obligation in accordance with SAB 121. This guidance
is effective from the first interim period after June 15, 2022 and should be applied retrospectively. We expect to adopt SAB 121 during
the three months ended August 31, 2022, and do not expect it to have any impact on our financial statements.
NOTE 2 – CRYPTOCURRENCIES
The following table presents additional information
about the Company’s Bitcoin for the nine months ended May 31, 2022:
Beginning balance
– August 31, 2021 |
$ 0 |
Revenue received from hosting |
21,141 |
Impairment of cryptocurrencies |
(3,775) |
Ending balance –
May 31, 2022 |
17,366 |
NOTE 3 – REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH
CUSTOMERS
The following table presents the Company’s
revenues disaggregated into categories based on the nature of such revenues:
| |
Three Months Ended May 31, | | |
Nine Months Ended May 31, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | | |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
Hosting revenue from mining – net | |
$ | 16,567 | | |
$ | – | | |
$ | 21,141 | | |
$ | – | |
Equipment sales | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| 344,700 | | |
| – | |
Total revenue | |
$ | 16,567 | | |
$ | – | | |
$ | 365,841 | | |
$ | – | |
NOTE 4 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
The following table sets forth the components of the Company’s
property and equipment at May 31, 2022 and December 31, 2020:
| |
May 31, 2022 | | |
August 31, 2021 | |
| |
Cost | | |
Accumulated Depreciation | | |
Net Book Value | | |
Cost | | |
Accumulated Depreciation | | |
Net Book Value | |
Equipment not yet in service | |
$ | 2,688,366 | | |
| – | | |
$ | 2,688,366 | | |
$ | 427,296 | | |
| – | | |
$ | 427,296 | |
Total fixed assets | |
$ | 2,688,366 | | |
$ | – | | |
$ | 2,688,366 | | |
$ | 427,296 | | |
| – | | |
$ | 427,296 | |
For the nine months ended May 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company recorded
$7,803 and $-0-, respectively in depreciation expense.
NOTE 5 – NOTES RECEIVABLE
As of May 31, 2022 and August 31, 2021 the balance
of notes receivable was $168,750 and $-0-, respectively. The note receivable carries a 10% interest rate. The note principal is payable
in two equal installments of $84,375 on April 15, 2022 and May 15, 2022, with all accrued interest being payable upon maturity of the
note. The note receivable arose from the sale of mining equipment to a third party for $337,500, in which half of the sale proceeds of
$168,750 was received by the Company in cash, and the remaining half was in the form of a note receivable for $168,750. During the three
months ended May 31, 2022, the Company recorded $4,485 in interest income on this note.
On May 5, 2022 by mutual agreement, the due dates
of the note were extended two months to June 15, 2022 and July 15, 2022, respectively. As of the date of this report, no payment has been
received on either installment due.
NOTE 6– LOANS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES,
RELATED PARTY
On July 22, 2021 the Company entered into a Line
of Credit Agreement with Innovative Digital Investors Emerging Technology, L.P.(“IDI), a limited partnership controlled by Jonathan
Bates, the Company’s Chairman, and Raymond Mow, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and a Director. The Line of Credit
Agreement was amended and restated in its entirety on August 4, 2021, on September 29, 2021 and March 30, 2022 (as amended and restated,
the “LOC Agreement”). The LOC Agreement, as most recently amended, provides for loans of up to $3,000,000 at the request
of the Company to finance the purchase of equipment necessary for the operation of the Company’s business, and related working
capital. Loans under the LOC Agreement accrue interest at fifteen percent (15%)
per annum, compounded on a 30/360 monthly basis until the loans have been repaid in full. The amount drawn, plus all accrued interest
therein, is repayable in full on July 1, 2022.
Subsequent to May 31, 2022, the Company
amended and restated the LOC Agreement to extent the period in which the Company may borrow funds under the LOC Agreement to August
31, 2022, and extended the maturity date to
December 1, 2022. See Note 6 – Subsequent Events.
As of May 31, 2022, and August 31, 2021, the Company
owed $1,894,109 and $277,296, respectively, on the Line of Credit. Additionally, these loans accrue interest at the rate of 15% percent
per annum. As of May 31, 2022, and August 31, 2021, accrued interest was $200,670 and $4,505, respectively.
As of May 31, 2022, and August 31, 2021, the balance
of accrued liabilities related party was $102,792 and $-0- respectively. The $102,972 is comprised of accrued salary and bonus due to
three company officers, two of whom are directors.
NOTE 7 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Stockholders’ Equity
The Company is authorized to issue 500,000,000 shares of Common Stock
with a par value of $0.0001. As of May 31, 2022, and August 31, 2021, there were 44,086,091 and 40,433,399 shares outstanding, respectively.
In January 2022, the Company commenced a $10.0 million Unit Offering
of its common stock and warrants at a Unit price of $1.25 per Unit, comprised of one share of its common stock, one Class C-1 Warrant
and one Class C-2 Warrant.
Each Class C-1 Warrant is exercisable to purchase
one share of the Company’s common stock until January 15, 2025, at an exercise price of $2.00 per share, provided that the Class
C-1 Warrant is callable on thirty days’ notice at by the Company at any time that (i) the market value of the Common Stock exceeds
$4.00 per share of the twenty (20) previous trading days (ii) the Common Stock has an average daily trading volume of greater than 50,000
shares per day during the previous (20) trading days, as reported by Bloomberg L.P. and (iii) a registration statement is in effect covering
the resale of the shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrant. The Class C-1 Warrant is exercisable on a cashless basis if the Company
fails to file a registration statement to register the shares issuable on exercise within thirty days of termination of the Unit Offering,
or such registration statement is not declared effective within six months after the termination of the Unit Offering; otherwise, the
Class C-1 Warrant may only be exercised on a cash basis.
Each Class C-2 Warrant is exercisable to purchase
one share of the Company’s common stock until January 15, 2025, at an exercise price of $4.00 per share, provided that the Class
C-2 Warrant is callable on thirty days’ notice at by the Company at any time that (i) the market value of the Common Stock exceeds
$7.00 per share of the twenty (20) previous trading days (ii) the Common Stock has an average daily trading volume of greater than 50,000
shares per day during the previous (20) trading days, as reported by Bloomberg L.P. and (iii) a registration statement is in effect covering
the resale of the shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrant. The Class C-2 Warrant is exercisable on a cashless basis if the Company
fails to file a registration statement to register the shares issuable on exercise within thirty days of termination of the Unit Offering,
or such registration statement is not declared effective within six months after the termination of the Unit Offering; otherwise, the
Class C-2 Warrant may only be exercised on a cash basis.
The Company accounts for the issuance of equity
in the Unit Offering under the guidelines of ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurement” since its common stock is considered thinly
traded and not indicative of fair market value.
Additionally, the Company accounts for warrants issued to purchase shares of its common stock in the Units Offering
as equity in accordance with FASB ASC 480, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in,
a Company’s Own Stock, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. Under those guidelines, the Company, using Black Scholes methodology to estimate the fair value of the warrants that are issued.
Using the Black-Scholes method and the variables below, the Company estimated that each Class C-1 Warrant was worth $0.41, each Class
C-2 Warrant was worth $0.40, and therefore that the value of the common stock sold in the Unit offering was worth $0.44.
Schedule of assumptions used table |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
|
|
$1.25 -$4,00 |
|
Stock Price |
|
|
|
|
$1.25 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
|
|
0.04% |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
|
|
223.3 |
|
Expected life (in years) |
|
|
|
|
3.00 |
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
$0 |
|
The paid in capital
associated with the Unit Offering has been aggregated on one line item in the Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity. No expense
was recorded in connection with the Unit Offering.
Issuance of Shares
During the nine months ended May 31, 2022, the
Company issued the following shares:
|
· |
200,000 shares to an investment banking firm for investment banking services. The shares were valued at $2.75 per share, which was the closing price of the shares on the date of issuance. |
|
· |
2,100,000 shares subject to vesting for services to a company employee. These common shares were valued at $0.44 per share as described above. The shares were valued at $924,000 amortized over a 60-month vesting period. |
|
· |
1,110,000
shares were sold to accredited investors under the Unit Offering. The Unit Offering was valued at $1.25 per Unit, as described
above for total proceeds of $1,387,500. |
|
· |
200,000 shares were issued to an investment banking firm for banking services. These shares were valued at $0.44 according to the methodology for the Unit Offering described above |
|
· |
42,692 shares were issued to an executive officer and director pursuant to the terms of
his employment contract. These shares are subject to vesting amortized over 60 months and were valued at $0.44 according to the
terms of the Unit Offering. |
The Company estimates the fair value of stock-based
compensation based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). That cost will be recognized over the period
during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award- the requisite service period (usually the vesting
period). The Company attributes compensation to expense using the straight-line method. Since the Company’s common stock is thinly
traded, the Company utilizes the value, or an estimate thereof, paid by third parties for common stock in arms-length transactions with
the Company.
Warrants
As of May 31, 2022, and August 31, 2021, the
Company had 590,000
Class A Warrants and 590,000
Class B warrants outstanding. Both sets of warrants entitle the holder to exercise the warrants on a cash or a cashless basis
until August 5, 2024. The Class A Warrants have an exercise price of $2.00
per share, and the Class B Warrants have an exercise price of $5.00
per share, but otherwise have identical terms. Also pursuant to the Company’s Unit Offering, as of May 31, 2022, the Company
had issued 1,110,000
Class C-1 Warrants and 1,110,000
Class C-2 Warrants.
NOTE 8 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
As of May 31, 2022, the Company was contractually committed to an equipment
supplier for approximately $130,000. This payable will be due to supplier when the underlying equipment is shipped. The shipment is expected
to occur by the end of September 30, 2022
NOTE 9 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Subsequent to May 31, 2022, the Company received
additional subscriptions for 3,012,000 Units in the Unit offering, for gross proceeds of $4,518,000. Of those subscriptions, 2,672,000
Units, equal to $3,340,000, was in the form of a sale of new mining equipment to the Company, and the remainder was in cash. On June
27, 2022, the Company terminated the Unit Offering. The Company sold a total of 4,122,000 Units in the Unit Offering for gross proceeds
of $5,152,500, of which 2,672,000 Units, representing proceeds of $3,340,000, consisted of an in-kind investment of transformers that
will be used in the Company’s hosting operations, and the balance was in cash. In addition, the Company issued 25,600 Class C-1
Warrants, 25,600 Class C-2 Warrants and 25,600 Class C-3 Warrants to a brokerage firm that referred certain investors in the Unit Offering.
Each Class C-3 Warrant is exercisable to purchase
one share of the Company’s common stock until June 27, 2027, at an exercise price of $1.25 per share. The Class C-3 Warrants are
exercisable on a cash or a cashless basis. Furthermore, the Class C-3 Warrants have piggyback registration rights that require that the
Company include the shares issuable upon exercise of the Class C-3 Warrants in any registration statement filed by the Company, except
for a registration statement on Forms S-4 or S-8.
On June 24, 2022, the Company amended and restated
its LOC Agreement with IDI. Under the new amended and restated LOC, the Company is entitled to borrow funds up to the limit of $3,000,000
with a new maturity date of December 1, 2022. All other terms of the prior LOC Agreement remained unchanged.
On August 29, 2022, the Company filed an Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “A&R COI”) with the Delaware Secretary of State. The A&R COI authorizes
the Company to issue up to 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share, with such rights and terms that the board
of directors may approve from time to time, whereas the prior Certificate of Incorporation did not authorize the Company to issue any
preferred stock.
On August 31, 2022, the Company filed a Certificate
of Designations, Rights and Preferences of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Certificate of Designation”) with the
Delaware Secretary of State, which authorized the creation and issuance of up to 500,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
(the “Series A Preferred”). Under the Certificate of Designation, the Series A Preferred has the following rights:
Dividends: Each share of
Series A Preferred is entitled to receive non-cumulative dividends equal to the amount of dividends that the holder of such share would
have received if such share of Series A Preferred were converted into shares of common stock immediately prior to the record date of
the dividend declared on the common stock.
Liquidation Preference:
The Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to receive, prior to any distribution to any junior class of securities, an amount equal to
$10 per share, plus any accrued but unpaid dividends, as a liquidation preference before any distribution may be made to the holders
of any junior security, including the common stock.
Voting Rights: Each holder
of Series A Preferred Stock shall vote with holders of the common stock upon any matter submitted to a vote of shareholders, in which
event it shall have the number of votes equal to the number of shares of common stock into which such share of Series A Preferred Stock
would be convertible on the record date for the vote or consent of shareholders. Each holder of Series A Preferred Stock shall also be
entitled to one vote per share on each submitted to a class vote of the holders of Series A Preferred Stock.
Directors: The Series A
Preferred Stock has the exclusive right to nominate and vote on two (2) members of the board of directors.
Voluntary Conversion Rights:
Each share of Series A Preferred Stock is convertible into that number of shares of common stock equal to the liquidation preference
of the Series A Preferred divided by a conversion price of $0.575 per share.
Rank: The Series A Preferred
ranks senior to the common stock and any other class or series of preferred stock that may be authorized.
Redemption by Company:
The Company may redeem all of the Series A Preferred at any time on twenty days notice by payment of the liquidation preference of the
Series A Preferred.
Redemption by the Holders:
Any holder of Series A Preferred may request that some or all of its Series A Preferred be redeemed to the extent of 30% of the liquid
net assets of the Company in excess of $2 million. To the extent any holder requests redemption under this provision, the Company is
required to send a notice to all other Series A Preferred holders, who will be entitled to request redemption of some or all of their
shares as well. Each holder is required to redeem at least the lesser of 10,000 shares or the number of shares of Series A Preferred
held by the holder.
Redemption on Fundamental Transaction:
In the event the Company engages in a fundamental transaction, a majority of the holders of Series A Preferred may require the Company
to redeem all of the Series A Preferred at the closing of the transaction.
Right to Participate in Future
Fundings: Each holder of Series A Preferred has the right to participate in future capital raising transactions to the extent of
its proportionate ownership of the Company on an as converted basis. The right extents to any issuance of common or preferred stock or
debt securities convertible into common or preferred stock, except for certain exempted transactions.
Anti-Dilution Protection:
The conversion price of the Series A Preferred is subject to reduction to the extent the company issues shares of common stock at a purchase
price less than the then current conversion price, (ii) debt or equity securities convertible into common stock at a conversion price
less than the then current conversion price, (iii) options or warrants exercisable for common stock at an exercise price less than the
then current conversion price, or (iv) options or warrants to purchase convertible debt or equity securities, where the combined exercise
and conversion prices would enable the holder to acquire shares of common stock for less than the then current conversion price.
On August 31, 2022, the Company and IDI agreed
to convert all principal and interest owed under the LOC Agreement into shares of Series A Preferred with a stated value equal to the
principal and interest converted. The conversion resulted in the conversion of $3,039,662 of indebtedness into 303,966 shares of Series
A Preferred. IDI is a limited partnership controlled by Jonathan Bates, the Company’s Chairman, and Raymond Mow, the Company’s
Chief Financial Officer and a Director.
On August 23, 2022, the Company issued the following
shares of capital stock to certain officers:
| · | 150,000
shares of Series A Preferred to Jonathan Bates, our chief executive officer; |
| · | 850,000
shares of Common Stock to Raymond Mow, our chief financial officer; and |
| · | 600,000
shares to Erik S. Nelson, our president. |
All of the shares are forfeitable on January
15, 2025 if the officer is not employed by the Company as of that date for any reason.
On October 19, 2022, the Company entered
into a Line of Credit Agreement (the “2022 LOC Agreement”) with IDI. The 2022 LOC Agreement provides for loans of up to $1,000,000
at the request of the Company to finance the purchase of equipment necessary for the operation of the Company’s business, and related
working capital. Loans under the 2022 LOC Agreement accrue interest at twelve percent (12%) per annum, compounded on a 30/360 monthly
basis until the loans have been repaid in full. The Company has the right to submit draw requests under the 2022 LOC Agreement until
April 15, 2023. Each draw request is subject to the approval of IDI in its sole discretion. The amount drawn, plus all accrued interest
therein, is repayable in full on December 1, 2023.
On October 19, 2022, the Company entered into
a Repurchase and Hosting Agreement (the “TCC Agreement”) with The Crypto Company (“TCC”), under which the Company
agreed to repurchase certain ASIC miners which it had previously sold to TCC, purchase some additional ASIC miners owned by TCC, and
terminate a hosting agreement between the Company and TCC. On February 23, 2022, the Company sold TCC 70 Antminer T-17’s for $175,000
and 25 Whatsminers for $162,500, for a total purchase price of $337,500. TCC paid 50% of the purchase price in cash, and the balance
by execution of a note payable to the Company for $168,750. Simultaneous with the sale, the Company and TCC entered into a hosting agreement
under which the Company agreed to host the miners at its hosting facilities in Trinidad, along with other miners owned by TCC. Under
the TCC Agreement, the Company (a) accepted the return of the 70 Antminer TY-17s for a credit of $175,000 as a warranty claim, (b) purchased
the 25 Whatsminers for $62,500, and (c) purchased 72 Antminer T-19s from TCC for $144,000. The credit and purchase prices for the equipment
were applied to cancel the note, with the balance of $212,500 paid by the Company in cash. Upon consummation of the TCC Agreement, the
hosting agreement was terminated.
On October 13, 2022, Company entered into a joint
venture with Roc Digital Mining Manager LLC (“ROC Manager”) with regard to a hosting location in Pecos, Texas which has a
capacity of 5-6 megawatts over a five year period. Under the joint venture, the Company acquired a 30% interest in ROC Manager, which
is the manager of ROC Digital Mining I LLC (the “ROC Operating”). The Company made a capital contribution to ROC Operating
of $1,056,000, consisting of one immersion container unit valued at $300,000, six GE Protec 1500 KVA transformers valued at $750,000,
and $6,000 cash. The Company also sold ROC Operating four immersion container units for $1,200,000. The purchase price for the containers
is payable pursuant to a promissory note that bears interest at 5% per annum and is payable through 42 monthly payments of $31,203.64
until it is paid in full. In addition, the note is secured by a lien against the four containers. The joint venture intends to purchase
ASIC miners to mine Bitcoin for its own account, rather than hosting miners for third parties.
In addition, the Company is entitled to locate
one hosting container at the site which it may use for mining for its own account or hosting for third parties, and expects to pay a
pro rata portion of the lease and other operating costs of the site.
Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
To the shareholders and the
board of directors of Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial
Statements
We have audited the accompanying
balance sheets of Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. as of August 31, 2021 and 2020, the related statements of operations, stockholders’
equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements").
In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of August
31, 2021 and 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based
on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB")
and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance
with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were
we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding
of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audit included performing
procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures
that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management,
as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
/S/ BF Borgers CPA PC
BF Borgers CPA PC
We have served as the Company’s
auditor since 2020
Lakewood, CO
December 9, 2021
Bitmine Immersion Technologies,
Inc.
Balance Sheets
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
218,737 |
|
|
$ |
1,930 |
|
Total current assets |
|
|
218,737 |
|
|
|
1,930 |
|
Fixed assets -not in service |
|
|
427,296 |
|
|
|
– |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
646,033 |
|
|
$ |
1,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
3,680 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
Accrued interest -related party |
|
|
4,505 |
|
|
|
1,558 |
|
Loans payable-related party |
|
|
277,296 |
|
|
|
50,447 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
285,481 |
|
|
|
52,005 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
285,481 |
|
|
|
52,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized; 40,433,399 and 2,688,400 issued and outstanding as of August 31, 2021 and August 31, 2020, respectively |
|
|
4,043 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
817,842 |
|
|
|
256,751 |
|
Retained earnings deficit |
|
|
(461,334 |
) |
|
|
(307,095 |
) |
Total stockholders' equity |
|
|
360,551 |
|
|
|
(50,075 |
) |
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
646,033 |
|
|
$ |
1,930 |
|
The accompanying notes are
an integral part of the financial statements.
Bitmine Immersion Technologies,
Inc.
Statements of Operations
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
For the period from July 16, 2020 through |
|
|
|
August 31, 2021 |
|
|
August 31, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
63,815 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
Related party compensation |
|
|
68,000 |
|
|
|
– |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
131,815 |
|
|
|
– |
|
Income(loss) from operations |
|
|
(131,815 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(22,424 |
) |
|
|
(1,558 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(22,424 |
) |
|
|
(1,558 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(154,239 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,558 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding: Basic and diluted |
|
|
9,758,184 |
|
|
|
2,688,400 |
|
The accompanying notes are
an integral part of the financial statements.
Bitmine Immersion Technologies,
Inc.
Statements of Changes in
Stockholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Stockholders' |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance, July 15, 2020 |
|
|
2,688,400 |
|
|
$ |
269 |
|
|
$ |
256,751 |
|
|
$ |
(305,537 |
) |
|
$ |
(48,517 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(1,558 |
) |
|
|
(1,558 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, August 31,2020 |
|
|
2,688,400 |
|
|
$ |
269 |
|
|
$ |
256,751 |
|
|
$ |
(307,095 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,075 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Stockholders' |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance, August 31,2020 |
|
|
2,688,400 |
|
|
$ |
269 |
|
|
$ |
256,751 |
|
|
$ |
(307,095 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,075 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from private placement of common stock |
|
|
32,994,999 |
|
|
|
3,299 |
|
|
|
490,316 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
493,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation related party |
|
|
4,500,000 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
67,050 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
67,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
3,725 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(154,239 |
) |
|
|
(154,239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, August 31, 2021 |
|
|
40,433,399 |
|
|
$ |
4,043 |
|
|
$ |
817,842 |
|
|
$ |
(461,334 |
) |
|
$ |
360,551 |
|
The accompanying notes are
an integral part of the financial statements.
Bitmine Immersion Technologies,
Inc.
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
For the period from |
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
July 16, 2020 through |
|
|
|
August 31, 2021 |
|
|
August 31, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(154,239 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,558 |
) |
Stock based compensation |
|
|
71,250 |
|
|
|
– |
|
Change in balance sheet accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
3,680 |
|
|
|
– |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
2,948 |
|
|
|
1,558 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
(76,361 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of fixed assets |
|
|
(427,296 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(427,296 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private placements of common stock |
|
|
493,615 |
|
|
|
– |
|
Related party loans -net |
|
|
226,849 |
|
|
|
– |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
720,464 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
216,807 |
|
|
|
– |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
1,930 |
|
|
|
– |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
218,737 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
The accompanying notes are
an integral part of the financial statements.
BITMINE IMMERSION TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST
31, 2021 AND AUGUST 31, 2020
NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION
AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Bitmine Immersion Technologies
Inc. f/k/a Sandy Springs Holdings, Inc. (“Bitmine” or the “Company”) is a Delaware Corporation that commenced
operations on July 16, 2020.
A predecessor to the Company
was incorporated in the state of Nevada on August 16, 1995 as Interactive Lighting Showrooms, Inc. On June 30, 2004, the predecessor changed
its name to Am/Tex Oil and Gas, Inc. On January 24, 2008, the predecessor changed its name to Critical Point Resources, Inc. On February
2, 2012, the predecessor changed its name to Renewable Energy Solution Systems, Inc. On May 18, 2012, the predecessor changed its name
to RES Systems, Inc. On May 23, 2013, the predecessor changed its name back to Renewable Energy Solution Systems, Inc.
On April 6, 2020, the predecessor
redomiciled in the State of Delaware by merging with a Delaware subsidiary named RESS Merger Corp., which was the successor in the merger.
Thereafter, effective July 15, 2020, the predecessor and the Company effected a holding company reorganization pursuant to Section 251(g)
of the Delaware General Corporation Law under which RESS Merger Corp. merged with RESS of Delaware, Inc., a Delaware subsidiary of RESS
Merger Corp., and all shareholders of RESS Merger Corp. received one share of common stock of the Company, another Delaware subsidiary
of RESS Merger Corp., for each share that they previously held in RESS Merger Corp., and RESS of Delaware, Inc. (the successor in the
merger with RESS Merger Corp.) becoming a subsidiary of the Company. As a result of these transactions Sandy Springs Holdings, Inc. became
the public company with 2,688,400 common shares outstanding. As part of the divestiture agreement, Sterling Springs Acquisition I, Inc.
(“Sterling”), a related party, acquired RESS of Delaware, Inc. and assumed all of its liabilities except a promissory note
due to Coral Capital in the amount of $50,477.
On June 25, 2020, the Board of Directors and
the shareholders of the Company approved a 1 for 40,000 reverse-split, with all fractional shares rounded up to the nearest whole share,
and immediately after the completion of the reverse split, effected a 200 for 1 forward stock split. The net effect of the splits as
a 1 for 200 reverse-split of the Company’s common shares. The stock splits were effective April 27, 2021. All
share amounts herein have been adjusted to give effect to the stock splits.
Effective July 17, 2020, the
Company divested RESS of Delaware, Inc. to Sterling Acquisitions I, Inc. (“Sterling”), which is owned by the chief executive
officer of the Company, pursuant to an agreement under Sterling (i) purchased Fifty Thousand (50,000) common shares of the Company for
an aggregate price of Ten Dollars ($10), and (ii) was issued Fifty Thousand (50,000) Class A Warrants at an aggregate price of Ten Dollars
($10), and (iii) Fifty Thousand (50,000) Class B Warrants at an aggregate price of Ten Dollars ($10). In addition, the Company agreed
to pay a fee of $1,000 to Sterling to cover the expenses associated with the maintenance of RESS of Delaware, Inc. until such time as
a certificate of dissolution is filed with the state of Delaware.
By a written consent dated July
16, 2021, holders of a majority of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock approved a resolution to appoint Jonathan Bates,
Raymond Mow, Michael Maloney and Seth Bayles to the board of directors of the Company, and to appoint Jonathan Bates as Chairman, Seth
Bayles as Corporate Secretary, Raymond Mow as Chief Financial Officer, and Ryan Ramnath as Chief Operating Officer (collectively, the
“New O&Ds”). Erik S. Nelson remained a director and the chief executive officer. At the same time, the shareholders approved
the issuance of 32,994,999 shares of common stock in the Company’s offering of common stock at $0.015 per share, and the grant of
4,750,000 shares for services, which were valued at $0.015 per share. As a result of the foregoing stock issuances, the New O&Ds (or
entities controlled by them) collectively acquired 24,893,877 shares of common stock, which represents 60.4% of the issued and outstanding
shares as of December 1, 2021.
The appointment of certain of
the New O&Ds to the Company’s board, and issuance to the New O&Ds of a controlling interest in the Company, were made in
order to enable the Company to enter the business of creating a hosting center for Bitcoin mining computers primarily utilizing immersion
cooling technology, as well mining the Bitcoin digital currency for its own account. Prior to the change of control to the New O&Ds,
the Company was a shell company.
The Company’s year-end
is August 31, 2021.
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying financial statements
have been prepared in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) “FASB Accounting Standard
Codification™” (the “Codification”) which is the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized
by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States.
Reverse Stock Split
On June 25, 2020, the Board
of Directors and the shareholders of the Company approved a 1 for 40,000 reverse-split and immediately after the completion of the reverse
split, effected a 200 for 1 forward stock split. The net effect of the splits as a 1 for 200 reverse-split of the Company’s common
shares (the “Reverse Split”). The stock splits were effective April 27, 2021. Accordingly, each 200 shares of the Company’s
issued and outstanding common stock were converted into one share of common stock, without any change in the par value per share. No fractional
shares of common stock were issued connection with the Reverse Split. If, as a result of the Reverse Split, a shareholder would have otherwise
held a fractional share, the shareholder received, in lieu of the issuance of such fractional share, one whole share of common stock.
In connection with the Reverse
Split, the number of authorized shares of Company’s common stock remained unchanged following the Reverse Split, with no change
in the par value thereof. Prior to the split there were 480,202,704 shares outstanding. Post-split there were 2,688,400 shares outstanding.
The Company’s financial
statements in this Report for the periods ended August 31, 2021 and August 31, 2020 and all references thereto have been retroactively
adjusted to reflect the split unless specifically stated otherwise.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements
in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. The most significant estimates relate to the
calculation of stock based compensation, useful lives and recoverability of long lived assets, income taxes and contingencies. The Company
bases its estimates on historical experience, known or expected trends, and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable
given the quality of information available as of the date of these financial statements. The results of these assumptions provide the
basis for making estimates about the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual
results could differ from these estimates. There have been no material changes to the Company’s accounting estimates since the
Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2020.
Revenue Recognition
On
July 1, 2018, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(“ASC 606”). Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018, are presented under ASC 606. As of and for
the year ended August 31, 2021, the financial statements were not impacted due to the application of Topic 606 because the Company had
no revenues.
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers all highly
liquid temporary cash investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. On August 31, 2021 and August
31, 2020, the Company’s cash equivalents totaled $218,737 and $1,930, respectively.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated
at cost or fair value if acquired as part of a business combination. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method and is charged
to operations over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. The carrying
amount and accumulated depreciation of assets sold or retired are removed from the accounts in the year of disposal and any resulting
gain or loss is included in results of operations. The estimated useful lives of property and equipment are as follows:
Computers, software, and office equipment |
1 – 5 years |
Machinery and equipment |
3 – 5 years |
Vehicles |
5 years |
Equipment is not depreciated
the asset is placed into service.
As of August 31, 2021 the Company
had $427,296 of equipment not in service.
Income taxes
The Company accounts for income
taxes under FASB ASC 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. Under FASB ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities
are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing
assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected
to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under FASB ASC 740,
the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment
date. FASB ASC 740-10-05, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” prescribes a recognition threshold
and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in
a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by taxing
authorities.
The amount recognized is measured
as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company assesses
the validity of its conclusions regarding uncertain tax positions quarterly to determine if facts or circumstances have arisen that might
cause it to change its judgment regarding the likelihood of a tax position’s sustainability under audit.
Stock-based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based
compensation using the fair value method following the guidance outlined in Section 718-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification
for disclosure about Stock-Based Compensation. This section requires a public entity to measure the cost of employee services received
in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). That cost will
be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award- the requisite service
period (usually the vesting period). No compensation cost is recognized for equity instruments for which employees do not render the requisite
service.
Net Loss per Share
Net loss per common share is
computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period as defined by Financial Accounting Standards,
ASC Topic 260, "Earnings per Share." Basic earnings per common share (“EPS”) calculations are determined by dividing
net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per common share calculations
are determined by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common share equivalents outstanding.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2016, the FASB issued
ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which establishes a new lease accounting model for lessees. The updated guidance requires
an entity to recognize assets and liabilities arising from financing and operating leases, along with additional qualitative and quantitative
disclosures. The amended guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15,
2018, with early adoption permitted. In March 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-01, Codification Improvements, which clarifies
certain aspects of the new lease standard. The FASB issued ASU 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases in
July 2018. Also in 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842) Targeted Improvements, which provides an optional
transition method whereby the new lease standard is applied at the adoption date and recognized as an adjustment to retained earnings.
The amendments have the same effective date and transition requirements as the new lease standard.
We adopted ASC 842 on July 16,
2020. The adoption of this guidance did not have any impact on our financial statements.
NOTE 3 - NOTES PAYABLE
RELATED PARTIES
As of August 31, 2020, the Company
has a demand promissory note carrying an interest rate of 24% due to Coral Investment Partners. The principal balance and interest due
as of August 31, 2020, was $50,447 and $1,558, respectively. At the time, both the Company and Coral Investment Partners (“CIP”)
were controlled by Erik Nelson. CIP made additional advances to the Company in 2021 to fund operating expenses. In July 2021 the Company
paid off the full balance of the promissory note due to CIP in the amount $87,447 in principal and $19,475 in interest
Company’s current liquidity
is derived from a Line of Credit Agreement with Innovative Digital Investors Emerging Technology, L.P., a limited partnership controlled
by Jonathan Bates, our Chairman, and Raymond Mow, our chief financial officer and a director. The Line of Credit Agreement was initially
entered into on July 22, 2021 and was amended and restated in its entirety on August 4, 2021 and on September 29, 2021 (as amended and
restated, the “LOC Agreement”). The LOC Agreement, as most recently amended, provides for loans of up to $2,500,000 at the
request of the Company to finance the purchase of equipment necessary for the operation of the Company’s business. Loans under the
LOC Agreement accrue interest at fifteen percent (15%) per annum, compounded on a 30/360 monthly basis until the loans have been repaid
in full. The Company has the right to draw down funds under the LOC Agreement until December 31, 2021. The amount drawn, plus all accrued
interest therein, is repayable in full on April 1, 2022.
The principal amount due under
the line of credit as of August 31, 2021 was $277,296.
NOTE 4 – EQUITY
Stockholders’ Equity
The Company is authorized to
issue 500,000,000 shares of Common Stock with a par value of $0.001. As of August 31, 2021 and 2020, there were 40,433,399 and 2,688,400
shares, issued and outstanding, respectively. During the fiscal year ended the Company issued 37,744,999 shares comprised of the following:
|
· |
155,000 shares were issued in a private placement at $0.01 per share, for gross proceeds of $1,550; |
|
· |
32,799,999 shares were issued in a private placement at $0.015 per share, for gross proceeds of $492,000; |
|
· |
4,500,000 shares were awarded to directors for services |
|
· |
250,000 shares were awarded to a consultant for services |
Effective July 15, 2020, RESS Merger Corp. and
the Company effected a holding company reorganization pursuant to Section 251(g) of the Delaware General Corporation Law under which
RESS Merger Corp. merged with RESS of Delaware, Inc., a Delaware subsidiary of RESS Merger Corp., and all shareholders of RESS Merger
Corp. received one share of common stock of the Company, another Delaware subsidiary of RESS Merger Corp., for each share that they previously
held in RESS Merger Corp., and RESS of Delaware, Inc. (the successor in the merger with RESS Merger Corp.) becoming a subsidiary of the
Company. As a result of these transactions the Company became the public company with 2,688,400 common shares outstanding as of July
15, 2020.
Warrants
As of August 31, 2021, the Company
had 590,000 Class A Warrants and 590,000 Class B warrants outstanding. Both sets of warrants may be exercised on a cashless basis and
are exercisable until August 5, 2024. The Class A Warrant have an exercise price of $2.00 per share, and the Class B Warrants have an
exercise price of $5.00 per share.
NOTE 5 – COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company did not have any
contractual commitments as of August 31, 2021.
NOTE 6 – SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
In accordance with FASB ASC
855-10, Subsequent Events, the Company has analyzed its operations subsequent to August 31, 2020, to the date these financial
statements were issued, and has determined that it does not have any material subsequent events to disclose in these financial statements
except as follows:
The Company purchased $1,470,000
in additional equipment bringing the principal balance on its LOC Agreement as of December 1, 2021 to $1,747,296.
In September 2021, the Company
issued 575,000 shares of common stock as a deposit for the purchase of a company whose only asset is an application to open a webhosting
facility.
In November 2021, the Company
issued 200,000 shares of common stock to an investment banker as compensation for investment banking services.
BITMINE IMMERSION TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.
14,887,800
Shares of
Common Stock
___________________
PROSPECTUS
___________________
, 2022
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
Item 13. Other Expenses of Issuance and
Distribution
The following table sets forth the expenses in
connection with this registration statement. All of such expenses are estimates, other than the filing fees payable to the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
| |
| Amount
to be paid | |
SEC registration fee | |
$ | 3,759 | |
Accounting fees and expenses | |
| 5,000 | |
Legal Fees and expenses | |
| 25,000 | |
Miscellaneous | |
| – | |
Total | |
$ | 33,759 | |
Item 14. Indemnification of Directors
and Officers
The Company is a Delaware corporation. Section 145(a)
of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or the DGCL, provides that a Delaware corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party
or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative
or investigative, other than an action by or in the right of the corporation, by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director,
officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee
or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys’ fees),
judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by the person in connection with such action, suit or
proceeding if the person acted in good faith and in a manner the person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests
of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was
unlawful.
Section 145(b) of the DGCL provides that a
Delaware corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or
completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that such person
acted in any of the capacities set forth above, against expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred by
such person in connection with the defense or settlement of such action or suit if the person acted in good faith and in a manner the
person reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the corporation, except that no indemnification shall be
made in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation, unless
and only to the extent that the Court of Chancery or the court in which such action or suit was brought shall determine, upon application,
that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all the circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled
to indemnity for such expenses which the court shall deem proper.
Further subsections of DGCL Section 145 provide
that:
(1) to the extent a present or former director
or officer of a corporation has been successful on the merits or otherwise in the defense of any action, suit or proceeding referred to
in subsections (i) and (ii) of Section 145 or in the defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, such person shall be
indemnified against expenses, including attorneys’ fees, actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection therewith;
(2) the indemnification
and advancement of expenses provided for pursuant to Section 145 shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which those
seeking indemnification or advancement of expenses may be entitled under any bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors
or otherwise; and
(3) the corporation shall have the power to purchase
and maintain insurance of behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving
at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust
or other enterprise, against any liability asserted against such person and incurred by such person in any such capacity, or arising out
of such person’s status as such, whether or not the corporation would have the power to indemnify such person against such liability
under Section 145.
As used in this Item 14, the term “proceeding”
means any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether or not by or in the right of the Company, and whether civil,
criminal, administrative, investigative or otherwise.
Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
and Bylaws both provide, in effect, that, to the fullest extent and under the circumstances permitted by Section 145 of the DGCL,
the Company will indemnify any and all of its officers and directors.
We may also enter into, and intend to continue
to enter into, separate indemnification agreements with our directors, officers, employees and agents that may be broader than the specific
indemnification provisions contained in the DGCL. These indemnification agreements may require us, among other things, to indemnify our
directors, officers, employees and agents against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors,
officers, employees and agents, other than liabilities arising from willful misconduct. These indemnification agreements may also generally
require us to advance any expenses incurred by the directors, officers, employees and agents as a result of any proceeding against them
as to which they could be indemnified. The indemnification provisions of the DGCL, our organizational documents and indemnification agreements
that we may enter into may be sufficiently broad to permit indemnification of our directors, officers, employees and agents for liabilities,
including reimbursement of expenses incurred, arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act.
The Registrant may purchase and maintain insurance
on behalf of each and every person who is or was a director or officer of the Registrant against any loss arising from any claim asserted
against him or her and incurred by him or her in any such capacity, subject to certain exclusions.
Item 15. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
Within the last three years, we have made the following
sales of unregistered securities:
| (1) | On November 8, 2019, the Company issued Coral Investment Partners, LP 1,500,000 shares of common stock for $100, 1,500,000 Class A
Warrants for $100, and 1,500,000 Class B Warrants for $100. |
| | |
| (2) | On July 17, 2020, in consideration for the agreement of Sterling Acquisitions I, Inc. to acquire RESS of Delaware, Inc., a wholly
owned subsidiary of the Company, the Company issued Sterling Acquisitions I, Inc. 50,000 shares of common stock for $10, 50,000 Class
A Warrants for $10 and 50,000 Class B Warrants for $10. |
| | |
| (3) | In June 2021, the Company issued 155,000 shares of common stock to 12 investors in a private placement at $0.01 per share, for gross
proceeds of $1,550. |
| | |
| (4) | In July and August 2021, the Company issued 32,799,999 shares of common stock to 17 investors in a private placement at $0.015 per
share, for gross proceeds of $492,000. |
| | |
| (5) | In July and August 2021, the Company issued 4,500,000 shares to two directors as a signing bonus for agreeing to serve on the Company’s
board. |
| | |
| (6) | In August 2021, the Company issued 290,000 to two consultants for consulting services. |
| | |
| (7) | In September 2021, the Company issued 575,000 shares to a third party as a deposit for the purchase of a private company, which issuance
was rescinded in December 2021. |
| | |
| (8) | In October 2021, the Company issued 200,000 shares to Sutter Securities, Inc. pursuant to an investment banking agreement. |
| | |
| (9) | In February 2022, the Company issued 2,100,000 shares of common stock to an officer as a signing bonus under an employment agreement. |
| | |
| (10) | From January 2022 to June 27, 2022, the Company issued 4,122,000 Units at $1.25 per Unit, in a private placement conducted pursuant
to Rule 506(b) under the Securities Act of 1933. Each Unit consists of one share of common stock, one Class C-1 Warrant and one Class
C-2 Warrant. In connection with the private placement, the Company also issued 25,600 Class C-1 Warrants, 25,600 Class C-2 Warrants, and
25,600 C-3 Warrants to a registered broker who referred three of the investors. |
| | |
| (11) | In April 2022, the Company issued 200,000 shares to a brokerage firm for investment banking services. |
| | |
| (12) | In May 2022, the Company issued 42,692 shares of common stock an executive officer and director pursuant to the terms of his employment
contract. |
|
(13) |
On August 23, 2022, the Company issued 600,000 shares of common stock to Erik Nelson, our present, 850,000 shares of common stock to Raymond Mow, our chief financial officer, and 150,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock to Jonathan Bates, our chief executive officer. |
|
(14) |
On August 31, 2022, the Company issued 303,966 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock to Innovative Digital Investors Emerging Technology, L.P. in satisfaction of $3,039,662 of indebtedness. |
All share and warrant amounts set forth above have
been adjusted to give effect to a net 1 for 200 reverse-split of the Company’s common shares effective as of April 27, 2021 (consisting
of a 1 for 40,000 reverse-split, with all fractional shares rounded up to the nearest whole share, and immediately after a 200 for 1 forward
stock split).
The offers, sales and issuances of the securities
described in paragraphs (5), (6), and (9) were deemed to be exempt from registration under Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities
Act as transactions under compensatory benefit plans and contracts relating to compensation, or under Section 4(a)(2) of the
Securities Act as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering. The recipients of such securities were our directors, employees
or bona fide consultants and received the securities under our equity incentive plans. Appropriate legends were affixed to the securities
issued in these transactions. Each of the recipients of securities in these transactions had adequate access, through employment, business
or other relationships, to information about us.
The offers, sales and issuances of the securities
described in paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (4), (7), (8) and (10) were deemed to be exempt under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities
Act or Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering. The
recipients of securities in each of these transactions acquired the securities for investment only and not with a view to or for sale
in connection with any distribution thereof and appropriate legends were affixed to the securities issued in these transactions. Each
of the recipients of securities in these transactions was an accredited investor within the meaning of Rule 501 of Regulation D
under the Securities Act and had adequate access, through employment, business or other relationships, to information about us. No underwriters
were involved in these transactions.
Item 16. Exhibits and Financial Statement
Schedules
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
3.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed September 6, 2022). |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Certificate of Designations, Rights and Preferences of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
(incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed September 6, 2022 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Certificate of Merger (incorporated by reference from Form 10 filed October 27, 2020). |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Bylaws of Sandy Springs Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference from Form 10 filed October 27, 2020). |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Amended Form of Class A Warrant (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed July 27, 2021). |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Amended Form of Class B Warrant (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed July 27, 2021). |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Warrant Agent Agreement by and between Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. and West Coast Stock Transfer, Inc. (incorporated by reference from Form 8-K/A filed September 9, 2021). |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Form of Class C-1 Warrant (incorporated by reference from Form S-1,
File No. 333-266348, filed July 27, 2022). |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Form of Class C-2 Warrant (incorporated by reference from Form S-1,
File No. 333-266348, filed July 27, 2022). |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Form of Class C-3 Warrant (incorporated by reference from Form S-1,
File No. 333-266348, filed July 27, 2022). |
|
|
|
5* |
|
Opinion of Davis Gillett Mottern & Sims, LLC. |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and Ryan Ramnath dated July 19, 2021 (incorporated by reference from Form 8-K/A filed September 9, 2021). |
|
|
|
10.2* |
|
Master Services Agreement between Telecommunications Services of Trinidad and Tobago Limited and the Company for Colocation Services dated October 21, 2021 |
|
|
|
10.3* |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
Line of Credit Agreement between the Company and Innovative Digital Investors Emerging Technology, L.P. dated October 19, 2022 (incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed October 19, 2022). |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
Promissory Note executed by ROC Digital Mining I LLC dated October 13, 2022 (incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed October 19, 2022). |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
Security Agreement executed by ROC Digital Mining I LLC and the Company dated October 13, 2022 (incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed October 19, 2022). |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Transfer, Bill of Sale and Assignment executed by ROC Digital Mining I LLC and the Company dated October 13, 2022 (incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed October 19, 2022). |
____________
* Filed
herewith.
Item 17. Undertakings
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:
1. To file,
during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this Registration Statement:
(i) To include any
prospectus required by section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;
(ii) To reflect in the prospectus
any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof)
which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed
that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the
form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent
no more than 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in
the effective registration statement.
(iii) To include any material
information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to
such information in the registration statement.
2. For the purposes
of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus
shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at
that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
3. To remove
from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination
of the offering.
4. For the purpose
of determining liability under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser:
(i) If the registrant
is relying on Rule 430B:
(a) Each prospectus
filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) shall be deemed to be part of the registration statement as of the date the
filed prospectus was deemed part of and included in the registration statement; and
(b) Each prospectus required
to be filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(2), (b)(5), or (b)(7) as part of a registration statement in reliance on Rule 430B
relating to an offering made pursuant to Rule 415(a)(1)(i), (vii), or (x) for the purpose of providing the information required
by section 10(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement
as of the earlier of the date such form of prospectus is first used after effectiveness or the date of the first contract of sale of securities
in the offering described in the prospectus. As provided in Rule 430B, for liability purposes of the issuer and any person that is
at that date an underwriter, such date shall be deemed to be a new effective date of the registration statement relating to the securities
in the registration statement to which that prospectus relates, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be
the initial bona fide offering thereof. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part
of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or
prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such effective
date, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement
or made in any such document immediately prior to such effective date; or
(ii) If the registrant is
subject to Rule 430C, each prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to an
offering, other than registration statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A,
shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness. Provided,
however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document
incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement
will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the
registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such
date of first use.
5. For the purposes
of determining liability under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser in the initial distributions of the securities, the
undersigned registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration
statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to
such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to the purchaser and will
be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser:
(i) Any preliminary
prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424;
(ii) Any free writing prospectus
relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used or referred to by the undersigned registrant;
(iii) The portion of any other
free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned registrant or its securities provided
by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant; and
(iv) Any other communication that
is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.
6. The undersigned
registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the underwriter at the closing specified in the underwriting agreements certificates in such
denominations and registered in such names as required by the underwriter to permit prompt delivery to each purchaser.
7. The undersigned
registrant hereby undertakes that:
(i) For purposes of
determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part
of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant
to Rule 424(b) (1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration
statement as of the time it was declared effective.
(ii) For the purpose of
determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus
shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at
that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising
under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers and controlling persons pursuant to the provisions above, or otherwise,
we have been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act,
and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities, other than the payment by us
of expenses incurred or paid by one of our directors, officers, or controlling persons in the successful defense of any action, suit or
proceeding, is asserted by one of our directors, officers, or controlling persons in connection with the securities being registered,
we will, unless in the opinion of our counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction
the question of whether such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act, and we will be governed by the
final adjudication of such issue.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized, in the City of Atlanta, State of Georgia, on the 14th day of November, 2022.
|
|
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc.
|
|
|
/s/ Jonathan Bates |
|
|
Name: Jonathan Bates |
|
|
Title: Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Name |
|
Position |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jonathan Bates |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
November 14, 2022 |
Jonathan Bates |
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Erik S. Nelson |
|
Director and President |
|
November 14, 2022 |
Erik S. Nelson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Raymond Mow |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
November 14, 2022 |
Raymond Mow |
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael Maloney |
|
Director |
|
November 14, 2022 |
Michael Maloney |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Seth Bayles |
|
Director and Corporate Secretary |
|
November 14, 2022 |
Seth Bayles |
|
|
|
|
BitMine Immersion Techno... (QX) (USOTC:BMNR)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Nov 2024 bis Dez 2024
BitMine Immersion Techno... (QX) (USOTC:BMNR)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Dez 2023 bis Dez 2024