Item 8.01.
|
Other Information.
|
As previously disclosed, on September 15, 2019, Energy Transfer LP, a Delaware limited partnership (Energy Transfer), entered into an
Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) with Nautilus Merger Sub LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a newly formed, wholly owned subsidiary of Energy Transfer (Merger Sub), and SemGroup Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (SemGroup), pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into SemGroup (the Merger), with SemGroup continuing as the surviving company and a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Energy Transfer. In
connection with the Merger, Energy Transfer filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) a registration statement on Form S-4, including a proxy statement/prospectus for
the solicitation of proxies in connection with the special meeting of SemGroups stockholders to be held on December 4, 2019, for purposes of voting, among other things, on the adoption of the Merger Agreement. On October 30, 2019, the
registration statement on Form S-4 was declared effective by the SEC and the definitive proxy statement/prospectus (the Proxy Statement/Prospectus) was filed.
In connection with the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, seven complaints challenging the sufficiency of the disclosures made in the
Proxy Statement/Prospectus, including multiple purported class action complaints, have been filed on behalf of SemGroup stockholders in the United States District Courts for the District of Delaware, Southern District of New York and the District of
Colorado. The seven complaints are captioned as follows: Walpole v. SemGroup Corporation et al., Case 1:19-cv-01957-MN (D.
Del.) (Oct. 15, 2019), Thompson v. SemGroup Corporation et al., Case 1:19-cv-01948-MN (D. Del.) (Oct. 15, 2019),
Lawrence v. SemGroup Corporation et al., Case 1:19-cv-02035-UNA (D. Del.) (Oct. 28, 2019), Topley v. SemGroup
Corporation et al., Case 1:19-cv-09630 (S.D.N.Y.) (Oct. 18, 2019), Hills v. SemGroup Corporation et al., Case 1:19-cv-10412 (S.D.N.Y.) (Nov. 8, 2019), Marzacco v. SemGroup Corporation, et al., Case 1:19-cv-10610 (S.D.N.Y.) (Nov.
15, 2019), Stallings v. SemGroup Corporation et al., Case 1:19-cv-03108 (D.Co.) (Oct. 31, 2019), which are herein referred to collectively as the
Stockholder Actions. In general, the Stockholder Actions allege that the defendants, which include SemGroup, members of SemGroups board of directors and, in two of the Stockholder Actions, Energy Transfer and Merger Sub, violated
Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or aided and abetted in such alleged violations, because the Proxy Statement/Prospectus allegedly omits or misstates material information.
The Stockholder Actions seek, among other things, injunctive relief preventing the consummation of the Merger, unspecified damages and attorneys fees.
Energy Transfer, SemGroup and the other named defendants believe that no supplemental disclosures are required under applicable laws; however, to avoid the
risk of the Stockholder Actions delaying the Merger and to minimize the expense of defending the Stockholder Actions, and without admitting any liability or wrongdoing, Energy Transfer and SemGroup are making certain disclosures below that
supplement and revise those contained in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, which are herein referred to as the litigation-related supplemental disclosures. The litigation-related supplemental disclosures contained below should be read in
conjunction with the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, which is available on the Internet site maintained by the SEC at http://www.sec.gov, along with periodic reports and other information that Energy Transfer and SemGroup file with the SEC. Energy
Transfer, SemGroup and the other named defendants have denied, and continue to deny, that they have committed or assisted others in committing any violations of law, and expressly maintain that, to the extent applicable, they complied with their
legal obligations and are providing the litigation-related supplemental disclosures below solely to try to eliminate the burden and expense of further litigation, to put the claims that were or could have been asserted to rest, and to avoid any
possible delay to the closing of the Merger that might arise from further litigation. Nothing in the litigation-related supplemental disclosures shall be deemed an admission of the legal necessity or materiality under applicable laws of any of the
litigation-related supplemental disclosures set forth herein. To the extent that the information set forth herein differs from or updates information contained in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, the information set forth herein shall supersede or
supplement the information in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus. All page references are to pages in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, and terms used below, unless otherwise defined, have the meanings set forth in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES TO THE PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS RELATED TO STOCKHOLDER ACTIONS
The disclosure in the section entitled Proposal 1: The Merger under the heading Background of the Merger, beginning on page 34 of
the proxy statement, is hereby amended by:
Amending and restating the third and fourth sentences in the fifth full paragraph on
page 36 under the heading Background of the Merger as follows:
Thereafter, the SemGroup board of directors determined that
it would not agree to exclusivity with any counterparty at such time and considered the value to its stockholders of a
sale-of-the-company transaction despite the earlier terminated discussions with other potential buyers and ongoing negotiations
with Company A in respect of the proposed joint venture transaction. Further, the SemGroup board of directors instructed representatives of Jefferies to proceed with a formal market check process, including outreach to potential counterparties, in
order to seek additional indications of value for SemGroup in response to Energy Transfers increased, revised unsolicited proposal.