| Item 2. |
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
|
References to the “Company,” “Ross Acquisition Corp. II,” “Ross,” “our,” “us” or “we” refer to Ross Acquisition Corp. II. The following discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition
and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the unaudited interim condensed financial statements and the notes thereto contained elsewhere in this report. Certain information contained in the discussion and analysis set forth below
includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. We have
based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us that may cause our actual
results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify
forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “continue,” or the negative of such terms or other similar expressions. Factors that might cause or
contribute to such a discrepancy include, but are not limited to, those described in our other SEC filings.
Overview
We are a blank check company incorporated as a Cayman Islands exempted company on January 19, 2021. We were formed for the purpose of effecting a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase,
reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses. We are an emerging growth company and, as such, we are subject to all of the risks associated with emerging growth companies.
Our Sponsor is Ross Holding Company LLC, a Cayman Islands limited liability company. The registration statement for the Initial Public Offering was declared effective on March 11, 2021. On March 16, 2021, we
consummated the Initial Public Offering of 34,500,000 units, including 4,500,000 additional units to cover over-allotments, at $10.00 per unit, generating gross proceeds of $345.0 million, and incurring offering costs of approximately $19.9
million, of which approximately $12.1 million was for deferred underwriting commissions.
Simultaneously with the closing of the Initial Public Offering, we consummated the private placement of 5,933,333 Private Placement Warrants at a price of $1.50 per Private Placement Warrant with our Sponsor,
generating gross proceeds of $8.9 million.
Upon the closing of the Initial Public Offering and the private placement, $345.0 million ($10.00 per unit) of the net proceeds of the Initial Public Offering and
certain of the proceeds of the sale of the Private Placement Warrants were placed in the Trust Account, located in the United States with Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company acting as trustee, and has been invested only in U.S.
“government securities” within the meaning of Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act, having a maturity of 185 days or less or in money market funds meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 promulgated under the Investment Company Act
which invest only in direct U.S. government treasury obligations, as determined by us, or cash, until the earlier of: (i) the completion of an Initial Business Combination and (ii) the distribution of the Trust Account as described below.
Terminated Business Combination
Business Combination Agreement
On January 17, 2023, the Company, entered into an initial business combination agreement (the “Business Combination Agreement”), with APRINOIA Therapeutics Inc., an
exempted company incorporated with limited liability under the laws of the Cayman Islands ( “APRINOIA”), APRINOIA Therapeutics Holdings Limited, an exempted company incorporated with limited liability under the laws of the Cayman Islands
(“PubCo”), APRINOIA Therapeutics Merger Sub 1, Inc., an exempted company incorporated with limited liability under the laws of the Cayman Islands and a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of PubCo (“Merger Sub 1”), APRINOIA Therapeutics Merger Sub 2,
Inc., an exempted company incorporated with limited liability under the laws of the Cayman Islands and a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub 2”) and APRINOIA Therapeutics Merger Sub 3, Inc., an exempted company incorporated
with limited liability under the laws of the Cayman Islands and a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub 3”, together with Merger Sub 1 and Merger Sub 2, the “Merger Subs”). The transactions contemplated by the Business
Combination Agreement are referred to herein as the “Terminated Business Combination.”),
Effective as of August 21, 2023 and in accordance with Section 11.01(a) of the Business Combination Agreement, the Company, APRINOIA, PubCo and
the Merger Subs mutually agreed to terminate the Business Combination Agreement and, consequently, the other Transaction Documents (as defined in the Business Combination Agreement) pursuant to the terms of a termination agreement entered into by
and between each of the parties to the Business Combination Agreement (the “Termination Agreement”). Further, under the Termination Agreement, each of RAC, Merger Sub 2 and Merger Sub 3 released APRINOIA, PubCo and Merger Sub 1, and each of their
representatives, affiliates, agents and assigns, and each of APRINOIA, PubCo and Merger Sub 1 released RAC, Merger Sub 2 and Merger Sub 3, and each of their representatives, affiliates, agents and assigns, for any claims, causes of action,
liabilities or damages relating to the Business Combination Agreement and the other Transaction Documents, except for certain provisions that survive the termination pursuant to the terms of the Business Combination Agreement, or for breaches of
the Termination Agreement. Further details regarding the termination and the Termination Agreement may be found in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 21, 2023
Extensions and Redemptions
On March 13, 2023, we held an extraordinary general meeting (the “Extension Meeting”). At the Extension Meeting, our shareholders approved as a special resolution, the
amendment of the Company’s amended and restated memorandum and articles of association to extend the date by which we must complete an Initial Business Combination by up to six months in one month increments subject to deposit of $165,000 into the
Trust Account for each month by which such date is extended (the “First Extension”). On March 13, 2023, following the shareholder approval, the Company filed the amendment to the amended and restated memorandum and articles of association with the
Registrar of Companies of the Cayman Islands. In connection with the Extension Meeting, shareholders holding 28,119,098 Public Shares exercised their right to redeem such shares for a pro rata portion of the funds held in our Trust Account as of
March 9, 2023, including any interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account (net of taxes payable). As a result, approximately $287.7 million (approximately $10.23 per share) was removed from the Trust Account to pay such holders. On March
31, 2023, APRINOIA made a deposit of $165,000 (the “First Extension Payment”) to the Trust Account. On April 13, 2023, APRINOIA made a second deposit of $165,000 to the Trust Account. On May 12, 2023, APRINOIA made a third deposit of $165,000 to
the Trust Account. On June 15, 2023, APRINOIA made a fourth deposit of $165,000 to the Trust Account. On July 12, 2023, APRINOIA made a fifth deposit of $165,000 to the Trust Account. On August 16, 2023, APRINOIA made a sixth deposit of $165,000 to
the Trust Account. The date by which we must complete an Initial Business Combination was extended from March 16, 2023 to September 16, 2023.
On September 15, 2023, we held an extraordinary general meeting in lieu of annual meeting of shareholders (the “Extraordinary General Meeting”)
to approve (i) a proposal to amend our Amended Memorandum and Articles of Association to extend the date by which we have to consummate an Initial Business Combination from September 16, 2023 to March 16, 2024 (such proposal, the “Second
Extension Amendment Proposal”, such extension, the “Second Extension” and March 16, 2024, the “Second Extended Date”), (ii) a proposal to amend our Amended Memorandum and Articles of Association to delete the limitations that we shall not
consummate a business combination or redeem shares if such actions would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001 (the “Redemption Limitation Amendment Proposal”), (iii) a proposal to elect Larry Kudlow as Class I director of our
board of directors (the “Director Election Proposal” and, together with the Second Extension Amendment Proposal and the Redemption Limitation Amendment Proposal, the “Proposals”) and (iv) a proposal to allow the adjournment of the Extraordinary
General Meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies in the event that there are insufficient votes for, or otherwise in connection with, the approval of the Proposals (the “Second Adjournment
Proposal”), each as more fully described in the proxy statement filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 31, 2023. The Second Extension Amendment Proposal, the Director Election Proposal and the Redemption Limitation
Amendment Proposal were each approved. In connection with the vote to approve the Second Extension Amendment Proposal, the holders of 1,339,804 of our Class
A ordinary shares properly exercised their right to redeem their shares for cash at a redemption price of approximately $10.74 per share, for an aggregate redemption amount of approximately $14.4 million. Following the aforementioned redemptions,
we have 13,666,098 ordinary shares outstanding, which includes 5,041,098 Class A Ordinary Shares and 8,625,000 Founder Shares. On September 18, 2023, affiliates of the Company deposited $75,000 into the Trust Account in connection with the
implementation of the Second Extension Amendment Proposal.
On August 21, 2023, the Business Combination Agreement was terminated. Further details regarding the termination and the Termination Agreement may be found in the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 21, 2023.
Our management has broad discretion with respect to the specific application of the net proceeds of the Initial Public Offering and the sale of Private Placement
Warrants, although substantially all of the net proceeds are intended to be applied generally toward consummating an Initial Business Combination. There is no assurance that we will be able to complete an Initial Business Combination successfully.
We must complete one or more Initial Business Combinations having an aggregate fair market value of at least 80% of the assets held in the Trust Account (excluding the deferred underwriting commissions and taxes payable on income earned on the
Trust Account) at the time of the signing of the agreement to enter into the Initial Business Combination. However, we will only complete an Initial Business Combination if the post-transaction company owns or acquires 50% or more of the
outstanding voting securities of the target business or otherwise acquires a controlling interest in the target business sufficient for it not to be required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act.
If we are unable to complete an Initial Business Combination by March 16, 2024 or such later date by which we must complete an Initial Business
Combination pursuant to an amendment to the our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association, we will (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up; (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten
business days thereafter, redeem the Public Shares, at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account, including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously
released to us to pay our tax obligations, if any (less up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses) divided by the number of the then-outstanding Public Shares, which redemption will completely extinguish Public shareholders’ rights
as shareholders (including the right to receive further liquidation distributions, if any); and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of the remaining shareholders and the board of directors,
liquidate and dissolve, subject in the case of clauses (ii) and (iii), to our obligations under Cayman Islands law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law.
Liquidity and Going Concern
As of June 30, 2023, we had approximately $10,000 in its operating bank account and working capital deficit of approximately $7.5 million.
Our liquidity needs through June 30, 2023 and prior were satisfied through a payment of $25,000 from the Sponsor to purchase certain expenses in exchange for the
issuance of the Founder Shares, the loan of approximately $90,000 from the Sponsor under the Note (as defined in Note 4), and the proceeds from the consummation of the Private Placement not held in the Trust Account. We repaid the Note in full on
March 19, 2021. In addition, in order to finance transaction costs in connection with an Initial Business Combination, the Sponsor or an affiliate of the Sponsor, or certain of our officers and directors may, but are not obligated to, provide the
Company Working Capital Loans (as defined in Note 4). As of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, there was $660,000 and $0, respectively, outstanding under any Working Capital Loans.
In connection with our assessment of going concern considerations in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard Board’s Accounting Standards
Update (“ASU”) 2014-15, “Disclosures of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern,” we have until March 16, 2024 to consummate an Initial Business Combination. As previously reported, on January 17, 2023, we signed
the Business Combination Agreement with, among other parties, APRINOIA Therapeutics, Inc. On August 21, 2023, as previously reported, the Business Combination Agreement was terminated. On September 15, 2023, the Company’s shareholders voted to
extend the date by which the Company has to consummate an Initial Business Combination from September 16, 2023 to March 16, 2024 or such later date by which the Company must complete an Initial Business Combination pursuant to an amendment to the
Company’s Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association. It is uncertain that we will be able to consummate another Initial Business Combination by March 16, 2024. Additionally, we may not have sufficient liquidity to fund our
working capital needs until one year from the issuance of these unaudited condensed financial statements. If an Initial Business Combination is not consummated by this date, there will be a mandatory liquidation and subsequent dissolution of the
Company. Management has determined that the liquidity condition and mandatory liquidation, should an Initial Business Combination not occur, and potential subsequent dissolution, raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as
a going concern. No adjustments have been made to the carrying amounts of assets or liabilities should the Company be required to liquidate after March 16, 2024.
Results of Operations
Our entire activity from inception to June 30, 2023 was in preparation for our formation and the Initial Public Offering, and, subsequent to the Initial Public Offering, identifying a target company for an Initial
Business Combination. We will not be generating any operating revenues until the closing and completion of our Initial Business Combination, at the earliest.
For the three months ended June 30, 2023, we had net income of approximately $2.3 million, which consisted of approximately a $1.6 million in non-operating gain resulting from the change in fair value of derivative
warrant liabilities and approximately $818,000 of income from investments held in Trust Account, partially offset by approximately $77,000 in general and administrative expenses.
For the three months ended June 30, 2022, we had net income of approximately $1.6 million, which consisted of approximately a $4.4 million in non-operating gain resulting from the change in fair value of derivative
warrant liabilities and approximately $515,000 of income from investments held in trust account, partially offset by approximately $3.3 million in general and administrative expenses.
For the six months ended June 30, 2023, we had net income of approximately $1.4 million, which consisted of approximately $4.4 million of income from investments held in trust account, partially offset by
approximately $1.4 million in general and administrative expenses and approximately a $2.1 million non-operating loss resulting from the change in fair value of derivative warrant liabilities and $457,000 of gain on waived underwriter commissions.
For the six months ended June 30, 2022, we had net income of approximately $10.0 million, which consisted of approximately a $13.1 million in non-operating gain resulting from the change in fair value of derivative
warrant liabilities and approximately $638,000 of income from investments held in trust account, partially offset by approximately $3.7 million in general and administrative expenses.
Contractual Obligations
Administrative Support Agreement
Commencing on the date that the Company’s securities were first listed on the New York Stock Exchange, we agreed to pay our Sponsor a total of $10,000 per month for office space, secretarial and administrative
services. Upon completion of the Initial Business Combination or the Company’s liquidation, we will cease paying these monthly fees. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, the Company incurred expenses of $30,000 and $60,000 under this
agreement, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2022, the Company incurred expenses of $30,000 and $60,000 under this agreement, respectively. As of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the Company had accrued approximately
$240,000 and $180,000 for services in connection with such agreement on the accompanying balance sheets, respectively.
Registration and Shareholder Rights
The holders of the founder shares, private placement warrants and warrants that may be issued upon conversion of the Working Capital Loans, if any, are entitled to
registration rights pursuant to a registration and shareholder rights agreement signed upon consummation of the Initial Public Offering. These holders are entitled to certain demand and “piggyback” registration rights. However, the registration and
shareholder rights agreement provides that we would not permit any registration statement filed under the Securities Act to become effective until the termination of the applicable lock-up period for the securities to be registered. We will bear
the expenses incurred in connection with the filing of any such registration statements.
Underwriting Agreement
An aggregate of $12.1 million will be payable to the underwriters of the Initial Public Offering for deferred underwriting commissions. The deferred fee will become
payable to the underwriters from the amounts held in the Trust Account solely in the event that we complete an Initial Business Combination, subject to the terms of the underwriting agreement.
On January 19, 2023, the Company received a waiver of underwriter fees from one of the underwriters in which the underwriter waived its entitlement to the payment of
any deferred underwriting commission to be paid under the terms of the underwriting agreement. As such, $6,037,500, has been forgiven on which $5,579,875 is presented in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of changes in shareholders
deficit and $457,625 is recognized as a gain on the waiver.
On January 23, 2023, the Company received a waiver of underwriter fees from a second underwriter in which the underwriter waived the right to receive its deferred
underwriting commissions payable upon the consummation of the Terminated Business Combination under the terms of the underwriting agreement. The second underwriter did not waive the right to receive its deferred underwriting commission payable upon
the consummation of any other Initial Business Combination.
Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies
Derivative Warrant Liabilities
We do not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks. We evaluate all of our financial instruments, including issued stock purchase warrants, to determine if such
instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives, pursuant to ASC 480 and FASB ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”). The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such
instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period.
The Public Warrants and the Private Placement Warrants are recognized as derivative liabilities in accordance with ASC 815. Accordingly, the Company recognizes the warrant instruments as liabilities at fair value and
adjusts the carrying value of the instruments to fair value at each reporting period until they are exercised. The initial fair value of the Public Warrants issued in connection with the Initial Public Offering were estimated using a Lattice model
and the Private Placement Warrants were estimated using Lattice model. The fair value of the Public Warrants as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 is based on observable listed prices for such Public Warrants. As the transfer of Private
Placement Warrants to anyone who is not a permitted transferee would result in the Private Placement Warrants having substantially the same terms as the Public Warrants, the Company determined that the fair value of each Private Placement Warrant
is equivalent to that of each Public Warrant. The determination of the fair value of the warrant liability may be subject to change as more current information becomes available and accordingly the actual results could differ significantly.
Derivative warrant liabilities are classified as non-current liabilities as their liquidation is not reasonably expected to require the use of current assets or require the creation of current liabilities.
Class A Ordinary Shares Subject to Possible Redemption
The Company accounts for its Class A ordinary shares subject to possible redemption in accordance with the guidance in ASC Topic 480 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity.” Class A ordinary shares subject to
mandatory redemption (if any) is classified as liability instruments and are measured at fair value. Conditionally redeemable Class A ordinary shares (including Class A ordinary shares that features redemption rights that are either within the
control of the holder or subject to redemption upon the occurrence of uncertain events not solely within the Company’s control) are classified as temporary equity. At all other times, Class A ordinary shares is classified as shareholders’ equity.
The Company’s Class A ordinary shares feature certain redemption rights that are considered to be outside of the Company’s control and subject to the occurrence of uncertain future events. Accordingly, as of Initial Public Offering (including the
consummation of the over-allotment), 34,500,000 Class A ordinary shares subject to possible redemption is presented at redemption value as temporary equity, outside of the shareholders’ deficit section of the Company’s condensed consolidated
balance sheets.
We recognize changes in redemption value immediately as they occur and adjusts the carrying value of the Class A ordinary shares subject to possible redemption to equal the redemption value at the end of each
reporting period. This method would view the end of the reporting period as if it were also the redemption date for the security. Effective with the closing of the Initial Public Offering (including the consummation of the over-allotment), the
Company recognized the accretion from initial book value to redemption amount, which resulted in charges against additional paid-in capital (to the extent available) and accumulated deficit.
Net (Loss) Income per Ordinary Share
The Company complies with accounting and disclosure requirements of FASB ASC Topic 260, “Earnings Per Share.” The Company has two classes of shares, which are referred to as Class A ordinary shares and Class B
ordinary shares. Income and losses are shared pro rata between the two classes of shares. This presentation assumes an Initial Business Combination as the most likely outcome. Net (loss) income per ordinary share is calculated by dividing the net
(loss) income by the weighted average shares of ordinary shares outstanding for the respective period.
The calculation of diluted net income (loss) does not consider the effect of the warrants underlying the Units sold in the Initial Public Offering (including the consummation of the over-allotment) and the private
placement warrants to purchase an aggregate of 17,433,333 Class A ordinary shares in the calculation of diluted income (loss) per share, because in the calculation of diluted income (loss) per share, because their exercise is contingent upon future
events and their inclusion would be anti-dilutive under the treasury stock method. As a result, diluted net income (loss) per share is the same as basic net income (loss) per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022. The
initial accretion associated with the redeemable Class A ordinary shares was excluded from earnings per share as the redemption value approximated fair value. Changes in redemption value in the subsequent periods is recognized as a deemed dividend
to shareholders in the calculation of net income per ordinary share.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-03, ASC Subtopic 820 “Fair Value Measurement of Equity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions”. The ASU amends ASC 820 to clarify that a contractual sales
restriction is not considered in measuring an equity security at fair value and to introduce new disclosure requirements for equity securities subject to contractual sale restrictions that are measured at fair value. The ASU applies to both holders
and issuers of equity and equity-linked securities measured at fair value. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the Company in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is
permitted for both interim and annual financial statements that have not yet been issued or made available for issuance. The Company is still evaluating the impact of this pronouncement on the unaudited condensed financial statements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13 – Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments
(“ASU 2016-13”). This update requires financial assets measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on relevant information about past
events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. Since June 2016, the FASB issued clarifying updates to the new standard including changing
the effective date for smaller reporting companies. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2016-13 on
January 1, 2023. The adoption of ASU 2016-13 did not have a material impact on its financial statements.
The Company’s management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards updates, if currently adopted, would have a
material effect on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K.
JOBS Act
The Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”) contains provisions that, among other things, relax certain reporting requirements
for qualifying public companies. We qualify as an “emerging growth company” and under the JOBS Act are allowed to comply with new or revised accounting pronouncements based on the effective date for private (not publicly traded) companies. We are
electing to delay the adoption of new or revised accounting standards, and as a result, we may not comply with new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for non-emerging growth
companies. As a result, the unaudited condensed financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with new or revised accounting pronouncements as of public company effective dates.
Additionally, we are in the process of evaluating the benefits of relying on the other reduced reporting requirements provided by the JOBS Act. Subject to certain conditions set forth in the JOBS Act, if, as an
“emerging growth company,” we choose to rely on such exemptions we may not be required to, among other things, (i) provide an auditor’s attestation report on our system of internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404, (ii)
provide all of the compensation disclosure that may be required of non-emerging growth public companies under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, (iii) comply with any requirement that may be adopted by the PCAOB
regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements (auditor discussion and analysis) and (iv) disclose certain executive compensation related
items such as the correlation between executive compensation and performance and comparisons of the CEO’s compensation to median employee compensation. These exemptions will apply for a period of five years following the completion of the Initial
Public Offering or until we are no longer an “emerging growth company,” whichever is earlier.
| Item 3. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information otherwise required under this item.
| Item 4. |
Controls and Procedures
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2023, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based on this
evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer has concluded that during the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2023 due to material weaknesses in
our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in the SEC guidelines for public companies. The material weakness identified related to ineffective review controls over the financial statement preparation process including the review of
new agreements, which led to the restatement of the prior quarter statements.
In light of these material weaknesses, we have enhanced our processes to identify and appropriately apply applicable accounting requirements to better identify and
evaluate agreements that affect our financial statements including making greater use of third-party professionals with whom we consult regarding complex accounting applications. The elements of our remediation plan can only be accomplished over
time, and we can offer no assurance that these initiatives will ultimately have the intended effects. We believe our efforts will enhance our controls relating to financial reporting, but we can offer no assurance that our controls will not require
additional review and modification in the future as industry accounting practice may evolve over time.
We do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all errors and all instances of fraud. Disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well
conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Further, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are
resource constraints, and the benefits must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all disclosure controls and procedures, no evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures can provide absolute assurance
that we have detected all our control deficiencies and instances of fraud, if any. The design of disclosure controls and procedures also is based partly on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance
that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Other than as disclosed above, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2023 covered
by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
| Item 1. |
Legal Proceedings.
|
None.
As of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, other than the risk factors included below, there have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in
our Form 10-K filed with the SEC on April 6, 2023. We may disclose changes to such factors or disclose additional factors from time to time in our future filings with the SEC.
We have identified a material weakness in our internal control
over financial reporting. If we are unable to develop and maintain
an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results in a timely manner, which may adversely affect investor confidence in us and materially and adversely affect our
business and operating results.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Our management is likewise required, on a quarterly basis, to evaluate the effectiveness of our
internal controls and to disclose any changes and material weaknesses identified through such evaluation of those internal controls. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial
reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
During the course of preparing the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, we identified a waiver of deferred
underwriter commissions which was executed during the three months ended March 31, 2023 and not accounted for. In January 2023, we received a waiver from one of the underwriters in which it indicated that it waived its entitlement to the payment
of any deferred discount to be paid under the terms of the underwriting agreement. The Company determined this error was material to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2023, as further discussed under Note 2 to
our Financial Statements – Restatement to Prior Period Financial Statements. As part of such process, the Company identified a material weakness in its internal controls over financial reporting related to the accounting treatment of certain fees
waived by the underwriters of the Company’s Initial Public Offering.
Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and prevent fraud. We continue to evaluate steps to remediate
the material weakness. These remediation measures may be time consuming and costly and there is no assurance that these initiatives will ultimately have the intended effects. A material weakness could limit our ability to prevent or detect a
misstatement of our accounts or disclosures that could result in a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements. In such a case, we may again be unable to maintain compliance with securities law requirements regarding timely
filing of periodic reports in addition to applicable stock exchange listing requirements, investors may lose confidence in our financial reporting, our securities price may decline and we may face litigation as a result of the foregoing. We cannot
assure you that the measures we have taken to date, or any measures it may take in the future, will be sufficient to avoid potential future material weaknesses.
As a result of this material weakness, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of June 30,
2023.
We may face litigation and other risks as a result of the material weakness in our internal control over
financial reporting.
As a result of such material weakness and the restatement, we face potential for litigation or other disputes which may include,
among others, claims invoking the federal and state securities laws, contractual claims or other claims arising from the restatement and material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and the preparation of our financial
statements. As of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we have no knowledge of any such litigation or dispute. However, we can provide no assurance that such litigation or dispute will not arise in the future. Any such litigation or
dispute, whether successful or not, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition or our ability to complete an initial business combination.
There are no assurances that the Second Extension will enable us to complete an Initial Business Combination.
Although the Second Extension was approved and implemented, the Company can provide no assurances that an Initial Business
Combination will be consummated prior to the Second Extended Date. Our ability to consummate an Initial Business Combination is dependent on a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. The Company expects to seek shareholder
approval of any Initial Business Combination. We were required to offer Public Shareholders the opportunity to redeem Public Shares in connection with the First Extension and the Second Extension, and we will be required to offer Public
Shareholders redemption rights again in connection with any shareholder vote to approve any Initial Business Combination. Even if an Initial Business Combination is approved by our shareholders, it is possible that redemptions will leave us
with insufficient cash to consummate an Initial Business Combination on commercially acceptable terms, or at all. The fact that we will have had separate redemption periods in connection with the First Extension, the Second Extension and any
Initial Business Combination vote could exacerbate these risks. Other than in connection with a redemption offer or liquidation, our shareholders may be unable to recover their investment except through sales of our shares on the open market.
The price of our shares may be volatile, and there can be no assurance that shareholders will be able to dispose of our shares at favorable prices, or at all.
If we are deemed to be an “investment company” for purposes of the Investment Company Act, we would be
required to institute burdensome compliance requirements and our activities would be severely restricted. As a result, in such circumstances, unless we are able to modify our activities so that we would not be deemed an investment company, we
may abandon our efforts to complete a Business Combination and instead liquidate the Company.
If we are deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Investment Company Act”), our
activities may be restricted, including:
| |
• |
restrictions on the nature of our investments; and
|
| |
• |
restrictions on the issuance of securities, each of which may make it difficult for us to complete an Initial Business Combination.
|
In addition, we may have imposed upon us burdensome requirements, including:
|
• |
registration as an investment company with the SEC;
|
|
• |
adoption of a specific form of corporate structure; and
|
|
• |
reporting, record keeping, voting, proxy and disclosure requirements and other rules and regulations that we are currently not subject to.
|
In order not to be regulated as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, unless we can qualify for an exclusion,
we must ensure that we are engaged primarily in a business other than investing, reinvesting or trading of securities and that our activities do not include investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading “investment securities” constituting
more than 40% of our assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. Our business is to identify and complete an Initial Business Combination and thereafter to operate the post-transaction business or
assets for the long term. We do not plan to buy businesses or assets with a view to resale or profit from their resale. We do not plan to buy unrelated businesses or assets or to be a passive investor.
We do not believe that our current and anticipated principal activities subject us to the Investment Company Act. To this end,
the proceeds held in the Trust Account may only be held as cash or invested in United States
“government securities” within the meaning of Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act having a
maturity of 185 days or less or in money market funds meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 promulgated under the Investment Company Act which invest only in direct U.S. government treasury obligations. Pursuant to the trust agreement, the
trustee is not permitted to invest in other securities or assets. By restricting the investment of the proceeds to these instruments or by holding the proceeds as cash, and by having a business plan targeted at acquiring and growing businesses
for the long term (rather than on buying and selling businesses in the manner of a merchant bank or private equity fund), we intend to avoid being deemed an “investment company” within the meaning of the Investment Company Act. If we do not
invest the proceeds as discussed above, we may be deemed to be subject to the Investment Company Act.
However, even if we invest the proceeds in United States “government securities” within the meaning of Section 2(a)(16) of the
Investment Company Act having a maturity of 185 days or less or in money market funds meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 promulgated under the Investment Company Act which invest only in direct U.S. government treasury obligations, we
may be deemed to be an investment company. The longer that the funds in the Trust Account are held in short-term U.S. government securities or in money market funds invested exclusively in such securities, the greater the risk that we may be
considered an unregistered investment company, in which case we may be required to liquidate.
As described further below, on March 30, 2022, the SEC issued proposed rules (the “SPAC Rule Proposals”) relating, among other
matters, to a proposed safe harbor for SPACs such as the Company from the definition of an “investment company” under Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act, provided that a SPAC satisfies certain criteria, including a limited time
period to announce and complete a de-SPAC transaction. Specifically, to fall within the safe harbor, the SPAC Rule Proposals would require a company to file a report on Form 8-K announcing that it has entered into an agreement with a target
company for a business combination no later than 18 months after the effective date of its registration statement for its initial public offering (the “IPO Registration Statement”). The company would then be required to complete its initial
business combination no later than 24 months after the effective date of the IPO Registration Statement. As we have not completed an Initial Business Combination within 24 months after the effective date of our IPO Registration Statement, we
would not be able to rely upon this safe harbor.
If we are deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, our activities would be severely restricted. In
addition, we would be subject to burdensome compliance requirements. If we are deemed to be an investment company and subject to registration under, compliance with and regulation under the Investment Company Act, we would be subject to
additional regulatory burdens and expenses for which we have not allotted funds. As a result, unless we are able to modify our activities so that we would not be deemed an investment company, we may abandon our efforts to complete an Initial
Business Combination and instead liquidate the Company. Were we to liquidate, our warrants would expire worthless, and our securityholders would lose the investment opportunity associated with an investment in the combined company, including
any potential price appreciation of our securities.
The SEC has issued proposed rules relating to certain activities of SPACs. Certain of the procedures that
we, any potential Initial Business Combination target, or others may determine to undertake in connection with such proposals may increase our costs and the time needed to complete an Initial Business Combination and may constrain the
circumstances under which we could complete an Initial Business Combination. The need for compliance with the SPAC Rule Proposals may cause us to liquidate the funds in the Trust Account or liquidate the Company at an earlier time than we might
otherwise choose.
As described above, on March 30, 2022, the SEC issued the SPAC Rule Proposals relating, among other things, to disclosures in
SEC filings in connection with business combination transactions between SPACs such as us and private operating companies; the financial statement requirements applicable to transactions involving shell companies; the use of projections by
SPACs in SEC filings in connection with proposed business combination transactions; the potential liability of certain participants in proposed business combination transactions; and the extent to which SPACs could become subject to
registration and regulation under the Investment Company, including a proposed rule that would provide SPACs a safe harbor from treatment as an investment company if they satisfy certain conditions that limit a SPAC’s duration, asset
composition, business purpose and activities. The SPAC Rule Proposals have not yet been adopted and, if adopted, may be adopted in the proposed form or in a different form that could impose additional regulatory requirements on SPACs. Certain
of the procedures that we, or any potential Initial Business Combination target, or others may determine to undertake in connection with the SPAC Rule Proposals, or pursuant to the SEC’s views expressed in the SPAC Rule Proposals, may increase
the costs and time of negotiating
and completing an Initial Business Combination and may constrain the circumstances under which we could complete an Initial Business Combination. The need for
compliance with the SPAC Rule Proposals may cause us to liquidate the funds in the Trust Account or liquidate the Company at an earlier time than we might otherwise choose. Were we to liquidate, our warrants would expire worthless, and our
securityholders would lose the investment opportunity associated with an investment in the combined company, including any potential price appreciation of our securities.
To mitigate the risk that we might be deemed to be an investment company for purposes of the Investment
Company Act, we have instructed Continental, the trustee, to liquidate the investments held in the Trust Account and instead to hold the funds in the Trust Account in an interest bearing demand deposit account until the earlier of the
consummation of an Initial Business Combination or our liquidation. Following the liquidation of investments in the Trust Account, we receive reduced interest, if any, on the funds held in the Trust Account, which reduces the dollar amount our
Public Shareholders would receive upon any redemption or liquidation of the Company.
The funds in the Trust Account were, from our Initial Public Offering until the end of March 2023, held only in U.S. government
treasury obligations with a maturity of 185 days or less or in money market funds investing solely in U.S. government treasury obligations and meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act. However, the longer that
the funds in the Trust Account are held in short-term U.S. government securities or in money market funds invested exclusively in such securities, the greater the risk that we may be considered an unregistered investment company, in which case
we may be required to liquidate. To mitigate the risk of us being deemed to be an unregistered investment company (including under the subjective test of Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act) and thus subject to regulation under the
Investment Company Act, we instructed Continental, the trustee with respect to the Trust Account, to liquidate the U.S. government treasury obligations or money market funds held in the Trust Account and thereafter to hold all funds in the
Trust Account in an interest bearing demand deposit account at a bank until the earlier of the consummation of our Initial Business Combination or the liquidation of the Company. Following such liquidation, we receive reduced interest, if any,
on the funds held in the Trust Account. However, interest previously earned on the funds held in the Trust Account still may be released to us to pay our taxes, if any, and certain other expenses as permitted. As a result, our decision to
liquidate the investments held in the Trust Account and thereafter to hold all funds in the Trust Account in an interest-bearing demand deposit at a bank is reduces the dollar amount our Public Shareholders would receive upon any redemption or
liquidation of the Company.
We may not be able to complete an Initial Business Combination if the proposed transaction is subject to
review or approval by regulatory authorities pursuant to certain U.S. or foreign laws or regulations.
Certain acquisitions or business combinations may be subject to review or approval by regulatory authorities pursuant to certain
U.S. or foreign laws or regulations. In the event that such regulatory approval or clearance is not obtained, or the review process is extended beyond the period of time that would permit an Initial Business Combination to be consummated with
us, we may not be able to consummate an Initial Business Combination with such target. In addition, regulatory considerations may decrease the pool of potential target companies we may be willing or able to consider.
In the United States, certain mergers that may affect competition may require certain filings and review by the Department of
Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, and investments or acquisitions that may affect national security are subject to review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”). CFIUS is an interagency committee
authorized to review certain transactions involving foreign investment in the United States by foreign persons in order to determine the effect of such transactions on the national security of the United States.
Outside the United States, laws or regulations may affect our ability to consummate an Initial Business Combination with
potential target companies incorporated or having business operations in jurisdictions where national security considerations, involvement in regulated industries (including telecommunications), or in businesses where a country’s culture or
heritage may be implicated.
U.S. and foreign regulators generally have the power to deny the ability of the parties to consummate a transaction or to
condition approval of a transaction on specified terms and conditions, which may not be acceptable to us or a target. In such event, we may not be able to consummate a transaction with that potential target.
As a result of these various restrictions, the pool of potential targets with which we could complete an Initial Business
Combination may be limited, and we may be adversely affected in terms of competing with other SPACs that do not
have similar ownership issues. Moreover, the process of government review, whether by
CFIUS or otherwise, could be lengthy. Because we have only a limited time to complete an Initial Business Combination, our failure to obtain any required approvals within the requisite time period may require us to liquidate. Were we to
liquidate the Company, our warrants would expire worthless, and our securityholders would lose the investment opportunity associated with an investment in the combined company, including any potential price appreciation of our securities.
The Company’s ability to complete an Initial Business Combination with a U.S. target company may be impacted
if such Business Combination is subject to U.S. foreign investment regulations and review by a U.S. government entity, such CFIUS, and ultimately prohibited.
The Sponsor, Ross Holding Company LLC, is a Cayman Islands limited liability company. Although entities organized in non-U.S.
jurisdictions such as the Cayman Islands are sometimes considered “foreign persons” under the regulations administered by CFIUS, the Company believes the Sponsor would not be considered a foreign person because it is ultimately controlled and
majority-owned by U.S. nationals.
In the event the Sponsor is considered a foreign person, however, the Company could also be considered a foreign person and
would continue to be considered as such in the future for so long as the Sponsor has the ability to exercise control over the Company for purposes of CFIUS’s regulations. The Company could likewise be considered a foreign person if a foreign
investor acquires a significant interest in the Company and is viewed as having the ability to exercise control over the Company. As such, an Initial Business Combination with a U.S. business may be subject to CFIUS review, the scope of which
includes controlling investments as well as certain non-passive, non-controlling investments in sensitive U.S. businesses and certain acquisitions of real estate even with no underlying U.S. business. If the Company’s potential Initial Business
Combination with a U.S. business falls within CFIUS’s jurisdiction, the Company may determine that it is required to make a mandatory filing or that it will submit a voluntary filing to CFIUS, or to proceed with the Initial Business Combination
without notifying CFIUS and risk CFIUS intervention, before or after closing the Initial Business Combination. CFIUS may decide to delay the Initial Business Combination, impose conditions to mitigate national security concerns with respect to
such Initial Business Combination or recommend that the U.S. president block the Initial Business Combination or order the Company to divest all or a portion of a U.S. business of the combined company, which may limit the attractiveness of or
prevent the Company from pursuing certain Initial Business Combination opportunities that it believes would otherwise be beneficial to the Company and its shareholders. As a result, the pool of potential targets with which the Company could
complete an Initial Business Combination may be impacted, and it may be adversely affected in terms of competing with other special purpose acquisition companies which do not have similar foreign ownership issues.
Moreover, the process of government review, whether by the CFIUS or otherwise, could be lengthy and the Company has limited time
to complete its Initial Business Combination. If the Company cannot complete its Initial Business Combination by March 16, 2024, or such later date that may be approved by the Company’s shareholders, because the review process extends beyond
such timeframe or because the Initial Business Combination is ultimately prohibited by CFIUS or another U.S. government entity, the Company may be required to liquidate. If the Company liquidates, its Public Shareholders may only receive
approximately $10.74 per Public Share (based on the amount held in the Trust Account as of August 28, 2023 (including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to us to pay our taxes), and the Company’s
warrants will expire worthless. This will also cause you to lose the investment opportunity associated with an investment in the combined company, including any potential price appreciation of our securities.
Our Sponsor holds all of our outstanding Class B ordinary
shares and as a result, controls the appointment and removal of directors, as only as only holders of our Class B ordinary shares have the right to vote on the election of directors and to remove directors prior to an Initial Business
Combination and will exert a substantial influence on other actions requiring a shareholder vote, potentially in a manner that shareholders do not support.
Our Sponsor owns, on an as-converted basis, 57.5% of our issued and outstanding ordinary shares, including 8,625,000
Founder Shares, which is 100% of the Class B ordinary shares. Accordingly, our Sponsor controls the appointment and removal of directors, as only as only holders of our Class B ordinary shares have the right to vote on the election of directors
and to remove directors prior to an Initial Business Combination. Our Sponsor will also exert a substantial, and in some cases, controlling, influence on other actions requiring a shareholder vote, potentially in a manner that shareholders do
not support, including amendments to our Amended Memorandum and Articles of Association. Our Sponsor and each member of our management team have agreed pursuant to the letter agreement to vote their Founder Shares and Public Shares in favor of
our Initial Business Combination. Following the redemptions of Public Shares in connection with implementation of the First Extension and the Second Extension, only 6,380,902
Public Shares remain outstanding. As a result, as of the Record Date, in addition to the shares held by the Sponsor, the Company would not need any of the remaining Public Shares to be voted in favor of an Initial Business Combination
if such proposal required only an ordinary proposal under Cayman Islands law, being the affirmative vote of at least a majority of our ordinary shares who attend and vote at a shareholder meeting of the Company.
If our Sponsor purchases any additional Class A ordinary shares in the aftermarket or in privately negotiated transactions,
although it is under no obligation to do so, this would increase its control. Such Public Shares purchased by the Sponsor would be (a) purchased at a price no higher than the redemption price for the Public Shares and (b) would not be (i) voted
by the Sponsor at the extraordinary general meeting or (ii) redeemable by the Sponsor. Any such purchases that are completed after the record date for the applicable meeting may include an agreement with a selling shareholder that such
shareholder, for so long as it remains the record holder of the shares in question, will vote in favor of the proposals to be voted upon at the shareholder meeting and/or will not exercise its redemption rights with respect to the shares so
purchased. The purpose of such share purchases and other transactions would be to increase the likelihood that any proposals to be voted upon at a shareholder meeting are approved by the requisite number of votes and to reduce the number of
Public Shares that are redeemed. In the event that such purchases do occur, the purchasers may seek to purchase shares from shareholders who would otherwise have voted against any proposals to be voted upon at the shareholder meeting and
elected to redeem their Public Shares for a portion of the Trust Account. Any such privately negotiated purchases may be effected at purchase prices that are below or in excess of the per-share pro rata portion of the Trust Account. None of the
Company, the Sponsor, the Company’s directors, the Company’s officers or any of their respective affiliates may make any such purchases when they are in possession of any material non-public information not disclosed to the seller or during a
restricted period under Regulation M under the Exchange Act.
A new 1% U.S. federal excise tax could be imposed on us in connection with certain future redemptions by us
of our shares.
On August 16, 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the “IR Act”) was signed into federal law. The IR Act provides for,
among other things, a new U.S. federal 1% excise tax on certain repurchases (including redemptions) of stock by publicly traded U.S. corporations and certain U.S. subsidiaries of publicly traded foreign corporations. The excise tax applies to
repurchases occurring after December 31, 2022. The excise tax is imposed on the repurchasing corporation itself, not its shareholders from which shares are repurchased. The amount of the excise tax is generally 1% of the fair market value of
the shares repurchased at the time of the repurchase. The U.S. Department of Treasury has been given authority to provide regulations and other guidance to carry out, and prevent the abuse or avoidance of, the excise tax; however, no guidance
has been issued to date. With respect to redemptions that occur in connection with the Extension or redemptions that occur under the circumstance where our Initial Business Combination is not with a U.S. corporation, because such redemptions
would occur when we are not a U.S. corporation, such redemptions generally would not cause us to be subject to the excise tax.
Absent the issuance of applicable guidance to the contrary, with respect to redemptions that occur in connection with an Initial
Business Combination with a U.S. corporation, because the Company might be domesticated as a U.S.
corporation and its securities are expected to trade on a national securities exchange at the time
shareholders exercise their redemption rights with respect to the Public Shares in connection with the Company’s Initial Business Combination, it is possible that the Company may be subject to the excise tax with respect to redemptions that are
treated as repurchases for this purpose. However, for purposes of calculating the excise tax, repurchasing corporations are permitted to net the fair market value of certain new stock issuances against the fair market value of stock repurchases
during the same taxable year, thereby reducing the amount of excise tax imposed with respect to repurchases of stock by a repurchasing corporation. The per-share redemption amount payable from the Trust Account (including any interest earned on
the funds held in the Trust Account) to public shareholders in connection with a redemption is not expected to be reduced by any Excise Tax imposed on us. The imposition of the Excise Tax on us could, however, cause a reduction in the cash
available on hand to complete our Initial Business Combination and may affect our ability to complete our Initial Business Combination or fund future operations.
| Item 2. |
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities.
|
None.
| Item 3. |
Defaults upon Senior Securities.
|
None.
| Item 4. |
Mine Safety Disclosures.
|
Not applicable.
| Item 5. |
Other Information.
|
None.
|
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
3.1
|
Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association, as amended March 13, 2023 and September 15, 2023.
|
10.1
|
Termination Agreement dated August 21, 2023 (previously filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 21, 2023 and incorporated by reference herein).
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
101.INS
|
Inline XBRL Instance Document- the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document
|
|
101.SCH
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
101.CAL
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
101.DEF
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
|
101.LAB
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
101.PRE
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
|
104
|
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
|
| * |
These certifications are furnished to the SEC pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be deemed
incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
|
Dated: October 10, 2023
|
ROSS ACQUISITION CORP II
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Wilbur L. Ross, Jr.
|
|
Name:
|
Wilbur L. Ross, Jr.
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: October 10, 2023
|
By:
|
/s/ Stephen J. Toy
|
|
Name:
|
Stephen J. Toy
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
35