As filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 5,
2010
Registration
No. 333-166448
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Pre-Effective Amendment
No. 7
to
Form S-11
FOR REGISTRATION UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
OF SECURITIES OF CERTAIN REAL
ESTATE COMPANIES
LEGACY HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES
TRUST INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in governing instruments)
189 South Orange
Avenue
South Tower,
Suite 1150
Orlando, Florida 32801
(407) 412-9200
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number, including area code, of registrants
principal executive offices)
Thomas J. Hutchison
III
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer
Legacy Healthcare Properties
Trust Inc.
189 South Orange
Avenue
South Tower,
Suite 1150
Orlando, Florida 32801
(407) 412-9200
(Name, address, including zip
code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for
service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
David C. Wright, Esq.
Daniel M. LeBey, Esq.
Hunton & Williams LLP
951 East Byrd Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
Tel: (804) 788-8200
Fax: (804) 788-8218
|
|
Jay L. Bernstein, Esq.
Per B. Chilstrom, Esq.
Clifford Chance US LLP
31 West 52nd Street
New York, New York 10019
Tel: (212) 878-8000
Fax: (212) 878-8375
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public:
As soon as practicable after the
effective date of this Registration Statement.
If any of the Securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act, check the following
box:
þ
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering.
o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering.
o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering.
o
If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to
Rule 434, please check the following
box.
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting
company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer
o
|
|
Accelerated
filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer
þ
(Do not check if smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting
company
o
|
CALCULATION
OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
|
Title of Each Class of Securities
|
|
|
Amount to be
|
|
|
Aggregate Offering
|
|
|
Amount of
|
To Be Registered
|
|
|
Registered(1)(3)
|
|
|
Price(1)
|
|
|
Registration Fee
|
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share(3)
|
|
|
10,062,500 Shares
|
|
|
$
|
191,187,500
|
|
|
|
$13,632(2)
|
Contingent Warrants(4)
|
|
|
10,062,500 Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Shares of Common Stock underlying the Contingent Warrants(5)
|
|
|
10,062,500 Shares
|
|
|
$
|
191,187,500
|
|
|
|
$13,632(2)
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
382,375,000
|
|
|
|
$27,264(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Estimated solely for the purpose of
calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(o)
under the Securities Act.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
In connection with the initial
filing of this Registration Statement and an amendment thereto,
a registration fee of $17,825 was paid on April 29, 2010,
an additional registration fee of $4,724 was paid on
July 7, 2010 and an additional registration fee of $3,997
was paid on September 16, 2010.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes shares of common stock
that may be issued upon exercise of a
45-day
option granted to the Underwriters to cover overallotments.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Includes warrants to purchase
shares of common stock that may be granted to purchasers of
shares of common stock issued upon exercise of the
45-day
option granted to the Underwriters to cover overallotments.
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Includes shares of common stock
that may be issued upon exercise of warrants that may be granted
to purchasers of shares of common stock issued upon exercise of
the
45-day
option granted to the Underwriters to cover overallotments.
Pursuant to Rule 416, there are also being registered such
additional securities as may be issued to prevent dilution
resulting from stock splits, stock dividends or similar
transactions as a result of the anti-dilution provisions
contained in the warrants.
|
The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this registration statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration
statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission,
acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and
may be changed. This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to
sell these securities and is not soliciting an offer to buy
these securities in any jurisdiction where such offer or sale is
not permitted.
|
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED OCTOBER 5, 2010
Preliminary
Prospectus
8,750,000 Shares
of Common Stock
and
Up to 8,750,000
Contingent Warrants
and
Up to 8,750,000
Shares of Common Stock
Issuable Upon
Exercise of the
Contingent
Warrants
We are offering 8,750,000 shares of common stock. This is
our initial public offering, and no public market currently
exists for our common stock. We expect the initial public
offering price of our common stock to be between $18.00 and
$19.00 per share. Our common stock has been approved for listing
on the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE, under the symbol
LRP.
We are also offering contingent warrants to purchase up to an
additional 8,750,000 shares of common stock at an exercise
price equal to the initial public offering price of our common
stock (subject to adjustment in certain circumstances), which
warrants would be issued only to investors who purchase shares
of common stock in this offering if certain events occur and
certain conditions are satisfied. If the warrants are issued,
they will be issued for no additional consideration. No public
market currently exists for the warrants. We intend to apply for
approval to list the warrants, if they are issued, on the NYSE
or the New York Stock Exchange Amex, or the NYSE Amex, under the
symbol LRP WS.
Concurrently with this offering, in a separate private
placement, we will sell an aggregate of 324,324 shares of
our common stock (representing additional net proceeds of
$6.0 million based on the expected initial public offering
price of our common stock) to certain of our executive officers
at a price per share equal to the initial public offering price
of our common stock.
We intend to elect and qualify to be taxed as a real estate
investment trust, or REIT, for federal income tax purposes
commencing with our short taxable year ending December 31,
2010. The shares of common stock offered by this prospectus are
subject to restrictions on ownership and transfer that are
intended, among other purposes, to assist us in qualifying and
maintaining our qualification as a REIT. Our charter, subject to
certain exceptions, limits beneficial and constructive ownership
to no more than 9.8% in value or number of shares, whichever is
more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of any class or
series of our capital stock.
Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk.
Please read Risk Factors beginning on
page 18:
|
|
|
|
|
We have no operating history and may not be able to successfully
operate our business or generate sufficient operating cash flows
to make or sustain distributions to our stockholders.
|
|
|
|
If we are unable to timely complete the purchase of the six
senior housing facilities we currently have under contract or at
all, we will have no immediate designated use for substantially
all of the net proceeds of this offering and the concurrent
private placement, we may experience delays in locating and
securing attractive alternative investments, and we will have
incurred substantial expenses without our stockholders realizing
the expected benefits.
|
|
|
|
We depend on the efforts and expertise of the members of our
management team and our business would be adversely affected by
the loss of their services.
|
|
|
|
Upon completion of the acquisition of the six senior housing
facilities that we currently have under contract, all six of the
facilities will be leased to affiliates of Senior Lifestyle
Management, LLC which will account for substantially all of our
revenues.
|
|
|
|
Due to our concentration in senior housing, a downturn in the
senior housing or general health care industry would adversely
affect our operations and financial condition.
|
|
|
|
To the extent we use the net proceeds from this offering and the
concurrent private placement to make distributions to our
stockholders, the amount of cash we have available to invest in
senior housing facilities or for other purposes would be reduced.
|
|
|
|
We will depend on our facility operators for a significant
portion of our revenues and operating income. Any inability or
unwillingness by our facility operators to satisfy their
obligations to us under their agreements with us could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations and our
ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
|
|
|
|
Our failure to qualify, or our failure to remain qualified, as a
REIT would result in higher taxes and reduced cash available for
distribution to our stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is no assurance that purchasers of common stock in this
offering will receive warrants, and, upon issuance of the
warrants, if any are issued, the exercise price of the warrants
could exceed the current market price of our common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If warrants are issued to purchasers of our common stock in this
offering, the dilutive effect of the warrants could have an
adverse effect on the future market price of our common stock.
|
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC,
nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved
of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful
or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PER SHARE
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
Public Offering Price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting Discounts and Commissions
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds to Company (Before
$ Expenses)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Delivery of the shares of common stock is expected to be made on
or
about ,
2010. We have granted the underwriters an option for a period of
45 days to purchase, on the same terms and conditions set
forth above, up to an additional 1,312,500 shares of our
common stock to cover overallotments. If the underwriters
exercise the option in full, the total underwriting discounts
and commissions payable by us will be
$
and the total proceeds to us, before expenses, will be
$ .
In addition, if the underwriters exercise the option, the total
number of warrants we may issue in connection with this offering
will increase by an amount equal to the total number of
additional shares of our common stock purchased by the
underwriters in connection with such exercise. Delivery of the
warrants, if they become issuable, is expected to be made on or
about ,
2010, or as soon thereafter as possible, subject to certain
conditions.
|
|
Jefferies &
Company
|
Stifel Nicolaus Weisel
|
Morgan
Keegan & Company, Inc.
Prospectus dated , 2010.
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus, any free writing prospectus prepared by us or
information to which we have referred you. We have not, and the
underwriters have not, authorized anyone to provide you with
additional information or information different from that
contained in this prospectus, any free writing prospectus
prepared by us or information to which we have referred you. We
are offering to sell, and seeking offers to buy, shares of our
common stock only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are
permitted. The information contained in this prospectus is
accurate only as of the date of this prospectus regardless of
the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any sale of shares
of our common stock.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
Until ,
2010 (25 days after the date of this prospectus), all
dealers that effect transactions in our common stock, whether or
not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a
prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers obligation
to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with
respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.
i
Summary
The following summary highlights information contained
elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary is not complete and
does not contain all of the information that you should consider
before investing in our common stock. You should read the entire
prospectus, including Risk Factors beginning on
page 18, before making a decision to invest in our common
stock. In this prospectus, references to our
company, we, us and
our mean Legacy Healthcare Properties
Trust Inc., a Maryland corporation, and its subsidiaries
and references to our operating partnership mean
Legacy Healthcare Properties, LP, a Delaware limited
partnership, the subsidiary through which we will conduct our
business. We consider Thomas J. Hutchison III, our
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Phillip M.
Anderson, Jr., our President and Chief Operating Officer, to be
our promoters. Upon completion of this offering and the
concurrent private placement, we will form one or more taxable
REIT subsidiaries, each a TRS, including (i) a wholly-owned
TRS holding company and its subsidiaries to which we may lease
certain of our facilities and which we collectively refer to as
our TRS lessee and (ii) other TRSs through which we may
provide non-customary services to residents at certain
facilities, which we refer to as TRS service providers. Unless
the context requires otherwise, references in this prospectus to
our facility operators refer to the third-party
operators that will lease senior housing facilities from us and
to the third-party operators that will manage senior housing
facilities that we anticipate leasing to our TRS lessee.
Furthermore, references in this prospectus to
warrants mean the contingent warrants to purchase up
to 8,750,000 shares of common stock (or up to
10,062,500 shares of common stock if the underwriters
overallotment option is exercised in full) that may be issued
under the circumstances and subject to the conditions described
herein.
Unless otherwise indicated, the information contained in this
prospectus assumes: (1) the sale of 8,750,000 shares
of common stock in this offering at an assumed public offering
price equal to $18.50 per share, which is the midpoint of the
initial public offering price range shown on the cover of this
prospectus; (2) the sale in a concurrent private placement
to certain of our executive officers of an aggregate of
324,324 shares of our common stock at a price per share
equal to the initial public offering price of our common stock
without the payment by us of any placement fees; (3) the
underwriters overallotment option to purchase up to an
additional 1,312,500 shares of our common stock is not
exercised; and (4) that no warrants to purchase additional
shares of our common stock are issued or exercised.
OUR
COMPANY
We are a self-advised real estate company that was recently
organized to acquire, own and actively asset manage
income-producing senior housing facilities that derive
substantially all of their revenues from private payment
sources, generate stable cash flows and have the potential for
long-term capital appreciation. Shortly after completion of this
offering and the concurrent private placement, we expect to
complete the acquisition of six high quality senior housing
facilities located in Florida, Illinois, New Jersey, New York
and Virginia for an aggregate contractual purchase price of
$240.0 million excluding transaction costs and the
assumption of certain deposit liabilities. We believe the
markets in which these facilities are located exhibit strong
demand, high barriers to entry and limited new supply. These
facilities contain 1,042 independent and assisted living units
with a weighted average occupancy of approximately 88.7% for the
six months ended June 30, 2010. Substantially all of the
revenues at these facilities are derived from private payment
sources. The acquisition of these facilities demonstrates our
ability to execute our growth strategy and acquire senior
housing facilities that meet our targeted acquisition criteria.
We were formed in April 2010 to utilize the substantial
experience and extensive network of relationships in the senior
housing and real estate industries of our management team, which
is led by Thomas J. Hutchison III, our Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, to identify and acquire independent living
facilities, or ILFs, assisted living facilities, or ALFs, which
may include Alzheimers/dementia care units or
free-standing Alzheimers/dementia care facilities, and
continuing care retirement
1
communities which, in each case, generate substantially all of
their revenues from private payment sources. We will generally
target high quality facilities that occupy a market leading
position within their local markets and are located in and
around metropolitan areas with strong demographic profiles, high
barriers to entry and limited new supply, as well as in
destination retirement areas such as California, Florida, North
Carolina, South Carolina and Texas. While not a primary focus of
our strategy, we may also opportunistically acquire additional
types of senior housing facilities, including but not limited to
senior apartments and skilled nursing facilities.
We intend to capitalize on our management teams prior
experience in utilizing creative and flexible acquisition, lease
and management structures to facilitate acquisitions and, where
appropriate, to participate on an after-tax basis in operating
improvements and capture potential growth in facility-level cash
flows. We may, for example, lease certain facilities to our TRS
lessee, which will contract with facility operators to operate
these facilities, or lease our facilities to facility operators
pursuant to net leases that will provide for the payment of base
rent subject to annual escalators and require additional
percentage rent based on gross revenues. For certain facilities,
such as skilled nursing facilities, that possess slower growth
characteristics or reimbursement risk from government programs
such as Medicare and Medicaid, we may use traditional net lease
structures even if the facilities are eligible for the TRS
lessee structure. Alternatively, we may lease the units in
certain facilities directly to the residents and form a TRS to
provide services to the residents.
A key element of our strategy is to employ a dedicated and
experienced asset management team to proactively manage our
facility operators in order to improve operational performance
and enhance the return on our investments. We plan to dedicate
substantially more resources to asset management than many
companies in our industry, which we believe will provide us with
a competitive advantage. Although we do not intend to operate
our facilities, our management team and the asset managers we
intend to employ will actively participate with our facility
operators in various aspects of the operations of our
facilities, including property positioning and repositioning,
operations analysis, physical design, renovation, capital
improvements, resident experience and overall strategic
direction. Our facilities will be managed by or leased to
experienced operators that we believe have track records of
growth and profitability.
We intend to elect and qualify to be taxed as a REIT for federal
income tax purposes commencing with our short taxable year
ending December 31, 2010.
MARKET
OPPORTUNITY
We believe the current market presents an attractive environment
for us to invest in senior housing facilities. We expect the
supply of suitable acquisition opportunities to grow as
(i) senior housing operators seek to monetize real estate
assets to fund growth in their core businesses,
(ii) investment managers seek liquidity for investors in
limited life funds and (iii) senior housing owners,
operators and investors continue to face challenges refinancing
debt used to acquire or develop senior housing facilities at
peak-market prices during the period from 2003 to 2007.
Moreover, we believe we will face less competition in the senior
housing market compared to other commercial real estate sectors
since generalist real estate investors have refocused on
distressed assets in the multifamily, industrial, office and
retail sectors in preference to the senior housing sector. In
addition, senior housing cash flows should benefit from
favorable demand and supply dynamics. Specifically, we believe
that senior housing cash flows will benefit as occupancy levels
revert to historical averages. This reversion will be driven by
favorable demographic trends and limited supply growth given
capital constraints in the senior housing industry and the
overall economy.
Upon completion of this offering, the concurrent private
placement and the acquisition of the six senior housing
facilities that we currently have under contract, we expect to
have approximately $72.3 million of cash available to
invest in additional senior housing facilities. We believe our
growth-oriented capital structure, together with our management
teams extensive network of long-standing relationships in
the
2
senior housing and real estate industries and the teams
depth of experience in using creative and flexible transaction
structures, position us to take advantage of the opportunities
described above.
OUR COMPETITIVE
ADVANTAGES
We expect to have the following competitive advantages:
|
|
Ø
|
Proven track record of acquiring senior housing
facilities
. Our management team has a proven
track record of identifying and acquiring senior housing
facilities. During their years of service as executive officers
of CNL Retirement Properties, Inc., or CNL Retirement, and its
external advisor, Mr. Hutchison and Mr. Anderson,
together with other real estate professionals that included
other members of our management team, as well as individuals who
are not affiliated with our company, oversaw the investment of
approximately $2.7 billion in equity capital that was
raised by CNL Retirement. CNL Retirement was a public,
non-traded REIT that raised capital through a series of
continuous offerings of its common stock at a fixed price of
$10.00 per share from its inception in 1998 through March 2006.
CNL Financial Group, Inc. and its affiliates are not sponsors of
and have no affiliation with our company, have not participated
in the preparation of this prospectus and are not endorsing our
company or an investment in our common stock.
|
|
Ø
|
Proven acquiror of senior housing facilities with access to
off-market acquisition opportunities.
Our
management team has substantial experience in the senior housing
and real estate industries and has developed an extensive
network of long-standing relationships with senior housing
owners, operators and developers, brokers, banks, insurance
companies, publicly-traded companies, fund managers, REITs,
private investors and other parties who invest in or otherwise
provide capital to the senior housing industry. We believe these
long-standing relationships will provide us with access to a
significant pipeline of off-market acquisition opportunities
that may not be available to other buyers.
|
|
Ø
|
Attractive initial portfolio with strong embedded
growth
. We believe the six senior housing
facilities we have under contract are high quality facilities
that occupy market-leading positions in markets with strong
demand, high barriers to entry and limited new supply. We
believe the acquisition of these facilities will provide us with
a strong platform to facilitate our future growth.
|
|
Ø
|
Internal growth focus
. Unlike many companies
in our industry that seek to generate internal growth through
annual rent escalators tied to increases in the Consumer Price
Index, or CPI, we intend to structure our transactions, where
appropriate, to capture potential growth in facility-level cash
flows on an
after-tax
basis. Our management team has substantial experience
structuring net leases that require facility operators to pay,
in addition to base rent, percentage rent based on gross
revenues. In addition, certain members of our management team
and certain of our director nominees have substantial experience
in the hospitality REIT industry where the TRS lessee structure
has been utilized since 2001. We believe this gives us a
competitive advantage to the extent we implement the TRS lessee
structure for certain facilities we acquire.
|
|
|
Ø
|
Growth-oriented capital structure
. After the
completion of this offering, the concurrent private placement
and the acquisition of the six senior housing facilities that we
currently have under contract, we expect to have approximately
$72.3 million of cash to invest in additional facilities
(assuming an initial public offering price of $18.50 per share,
which is the midpoint of the initial public offering price range
shown on the cover of this prospectus). We believe certain of
our competitors face challenges from the recent economic
downturn, such as deteriorating facility-level cash flows and
excessive leverage combined with upcoming debt maturities, which
will keep management focused on balance sheet repair rather than
pursuing senior housing acquisitions. We will not have these
issues, which will enable the members of our management team to
dedicate substantial amounts of their time to sourcing,
negotiating and completing senior housing acquisitions. We also
intend to obtain a revolving credit facility to provide us with
additional liquidity to, among other things, pursue acquisitions
which may require capital exceeding the funds raised in this
offering. There is no assurance that we will be successful in
securing a revolving credit facility on terms that are
acceptable to us or at all.
|
3
|
|
Ø
|
Active asset management
. Given our strategy of employing
creative and flexible acquisition, leasing and management
structures to facilitate acquisitions and, where appropriate, to
participate on an after-tax basis in operating improvements and
capture potential growth in facility-level cash flows, we plan
to dedicate substantially more resources to asset management
than many companies in our industry, which we believe will
provide us with a competitive advantage.
|
|
Ø
|
Committed management team with interests aligned with
stockholders
. Certain members of our management team will
invest $6.0 million in our common stock in the concurrent
private placement which will result in ownership by our
management team of approximately 3.56% of our outstanding common
stock upon the completion of this offering and the concurrent
private placement. We believe that our management teams
equity ownership in our company will strongly align the
teams interests with those of our stockholders.
|
OUR
PORTFOLIO
The following table sets forth information regarding the senior
housing facilities that we have under contract and expect to
acquire after completion of this offering and the concurrent
private placement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of
|
|
|
of
units
|
|
|
Year
built/last
|
|
|
|
Facility/location
|
|
facility
|
|
|
ILF
|
|
|
ALF
(1)
|
|
|
major
renovation
|
|
Occupancy
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
Lake Barrington WoodsLake Barrington, IL
|
|
|
ILF
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
95.4
|
%
|
Bella TerraJackson, NJ
|
|
|
ILF
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
86.2
|
|
BaywindeWebster,
NY
(3)
|
|
|
ILF
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
88.1
|
|
Walden PlaceCortland, NY
|
|
|
ALF
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
96.1
|
|
Chancellors VillageFredericksburg, VA
|
|
|
ILF
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
1989/1998
|
|
|
77.4
|
|
Mangrove BayJupiter, FL
|
|
|
ILF
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
94.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total/Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
|
|
88.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes 88 Alzheimers/dementia care units.
|
|
(2)
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the occupancy
rates shown represent the average occupancy rate for the period
determined by calculating the average of the average monthly
occupancy rates for each month for the six months ended
June 30, 2010.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Consists of a campus that includes nine separate buildings,
eight of which are referred to as Castle Pointe and one of which
is referred to as Sage Harbor.
|
The aggregate contractual purchase price excluding transaction
costs and the assumption of certain deposit liabilities for the
six facilities is $240.0 million. Approximately
$81.9 million of the contractual purchase price will be
paid in cash. The remainder of the contractual purchase price
will be paid through our assumption of approximately
$158.1 million of in-place mortgage debt.
The purchase and sale agreement for the six senior housing
facilities contains various customary conditions to closing.
There can be no assurances that all of these conditions will be
satisfied or waived and that we will be able to complete the
acquisition of these facilities on the terms described herein or
at all.
As further described in Material Federal Income Tax
Considerations, following completion of this offering and
our receipt of the private letter ruling from the Internal
Revenue Service, or IRS, that we intend to request confirming
our ability to lease the six facilities we have under contract
to our TRS lessee and the regulatory approvals required to
transfer the operating licenses for these facilities to our TRS
lessee, we intend to lease these facilities to our TRS lessee.
Pending receipt of these approvals and upon completion of the
acquisition of the six senior housing facilities we have under
contract:
4
|
|
Ø
|
We will enter into new leases for Lake Barrington Woods, Bella
Terra, BaywindeCastle Pointe, Chancellors Village
and Mangrove Bay with affiliates of Senior Lifestyle Management,
LLC, or Senior Lifestyle Management, the management company that
currently operates the six facilities we have under contract.
Each of these new leases will have a term that expires on
January 31, 2012, with a possible extension for a period
not to exceed 18 months.
|
|
Ø
|
Until the necessary regulatory approvals to transfer the
operating licenses from the current facility operators to
affiliates of Senior Lifestyle Management are obtained from the
New York State Department of Health, affiliates of Senior
Lifestyle Management will continue to lease BaywindeSage
Harbor and Walden Place, or the New York assisted living
facilities, from us pursuant to existing leases which have terms
that expire on June 18, 2013 without renewal options. We
will amend and restate the existing leases upon receipt of the
necessary regulatory approvals.
|
We refer to the affiliates of Senior Lifestyle Management that
will lease Lake Barrington Woods, Bella Terra,
BaywindeCastle Pointe, Chancellors Village and
Mangrove Bay and the New York assisted living facilities as
tenants, except in the case where we implement the TRS lessee
structure, in which case the TRS lessee will be the tenant.
We will have the right to terminate the new leases with respect
to the six senior housing facilities we have under contract at
any time upon 30 days prior written notice, and the
existing leases at any time, without penalty. The tenants will
be required to pay us aggregate fixed rent under the new and
existing leases at an annual rate of approximately
$16.3 million in 2010, $18.5 million in 2011,
$20.7 million in 2012 and $21.0 million in 2013.
The tenants at the facilities, other than the New York assisted
living facilities, will enter into new management agreements
with Senior Lifestyle Management. Senior Lifestyle Management
will continue to operate the New York assisted living facilities
pursuant to existing management agreements with the current
facility operators who are not affiliated with Senior Lifestyle
Management. Once the necessary regulatory approvals are
obtained, the existing management agreements will be replaced
with new management agreements with Senior Lifestyle Management.
We will not be a party to any of these management agreements,
and, therefore, we will not be responsible for any payments
under these management agreements, until such time as the
management agreements are assigned to our TRS lessee as
described below.
The new management agreements for the facilities other than the
New York assisted living facilities will each have a term of
20 years. The new management agreements for the two New
York assisted living facilities will each have an initial term
of five years, and Senior Lifestyle Management will have the
right to extend the agreements for three additional five-year
terms. Under the new management agreements, the tenants will be
required to pay Senior Lifestyle Management a base management
fee equal to a percentage of the gross revenue generated at the
facilities, as well as additional incentive fees that will be
payable to Senior Lifestyle Management to the extent annual net
operating income of the facilities on a combined basis exceeds
certain thresholds. Senior Lifestyle Management will also be
entitled to receive an additional incentive payment from the
tenant upon a sale of the applicable facility under certain
circumstances.
During the term of the new management agreements, each tenant
has the right to terminate the agreement, at any time, without
paying a termination fee to Senior Lifestyle Management if there
has been an event of default (as defined in the new management
agreements) or if Senior Lifestyle Management does not meet or
exceed certain baseline performance targets based on the
portfolios and the facilitys annual net operating
income. Additionally, each tenant has the right to terminate the
new management agreement with Senior Lifestyle Management if, at
any time, the applicable facility is sold and the tenant pays
Senior Lifestyle Management a termination fee equal to an amount
ranging from 3.5x to 1.0x the trailing 12 months of base
management fees actually paid to Senior Lifestyle Management
depending on when the facility is sold. Beginning in 2014 and
anytime thereafter, each tenant has the right to terminate the
new management agreement if Senior Lifestyle Management fails to
meet performance targets (set at levels that are higher than the
baseline performance targets) and the
5
tenant pays Senior Lifestyle Management a termination fee equal
to 3.5x the base management fees actually paid to Senior
Lifestyle Management over the trailing 12-month period prior to
termination.
If we are successful in obtaining a private letter ruling from
the IRS that allows us to lease the facilities to a TRS lessee
and the regulatory approvals necessary to transfer the operating
licenses from the facility operators to our TRS lessee, the
tenants will assign the new management agreements to our TRS
lessee and our TRS lessee will assume the tenants
obligations under each management agreement.
If the IRS does not confirm our ability to use a TRS lessee for
certain of these facilities, we will either lease the units at
the facilities directly to the residents and use a TRS to
provide services to the residents or net lease the facilities to
affiliates of Senior Lifestyle Management under long-term net
leases that provide for the payment of base rent subject to
annual escalators as well as additional percentage rent based on
gross revenues.
For additional information, including information regarding the
fees payable under the new management agreements, see
BusinessOur Portfolio.
INVESTMENT
STRATEGY
Our objective is to maximize total returns to our stockholders
through the payment of consistent cash distributions and the
achievement of long-term capital appreciation in our properties.
We intend to achieve this objective by acquiring senior housing
facilities that generate substantially all of their revenues
from private payment sources. We will target facilities that
occupy a market-leading position within their local markets and
that are located in and around metropolitan areas with strong
demographic profiles, as well as in destination retirement areas.
Our primary focus will be on identifying and acquiring the
following facilities:
|
|
Ø
|
independent living facilities;
|
|
Ø
|
assisted living facilities, including freestanding
Alzheimers/dementia care facilities; and
|
|
Ø
|
continuing care retirement communities.
|
While not a primary focus of our strategy, we may also
opportunistically acquire from time to time additional types of
senior housing facilities, including but not limited to senior
apartments and skilled nursing facilities.
OUR GROWTH
STRATEGIES
Our objective is to maximize total returns to our stockholders
through the payment of consistent cash distributions and the
achievement of long-term capital appreciation in our properties
through the pursuit of the following growth strategies:
|
|
Ø
|
Capitalize on network of relationships to pursue off-market
transactions.
We plan to pursue off-market
transactions in our target markets through the long-standing
relationships our management team has developed over the past
20 years. We believe these relationships will be a
significant source of senior housing acquisition opportunities.
|
|
Ø
|
Utilize creative and flexible transaction structures to
participate in operating improvements
. We intend
to capitalize on our management teams prior experience in
utilizing creative and flexible acquisition, management and
lease structures that allow senior housing REITs to capture
potential growth in facility-level cash flows.
|
|
Ø
|
Maximize value through active asset
management
. Based on our management teams
prior experience, we expect to allocate a significant portion of
our staffing resources to asset management based on an active
ownership philosophy that engages our facility operators in a
cooperative relationship. Although we do not intend to operate
our senior housing facilities directly, we will actively
participate with our facility operators in various aspects of
the operations of our facilities,
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
including positioning and repositioning, operations analysis,
physical design, renovation, capital improvements, resident
experience and overall strategic direction.
|
SUMMARY RISK
FACTORS
An investment in our common stock involves various risks. You
should carefully consider the matters discussed in Risk
Factors beginning on page 18 of this prospectus
before you decide whether to invest in our common stock. Some of
the risks include the following:
|
|
Ø
|
We have no operating history and may not be able to successfully
operate our business or generate sufficient operating cash flows
to make or sustain distributions to our stockholders.
|
|
Ø
|
If we are unable to timely complete the purchase of the six
senior housing facilities we currently have under contract or at
all, we will have no immediate designated use for substantially
all of the net proceeds of this offering and the concurrent
private placement, we may experience delays in locating and
securing attractive alternative investments, and we will have
incurred substantial expenses without our stockholders realizing
the expected benefits.
|
|
Ø
|
We depend on the efforts and expertise of the members of our
management team and our business would be adversely affected by
the loss of their services.
|
|
Ø
|
Upon completion of the acquisition of the six senior housing
facilities that we currently have under contract, all six of the
facilities will be leased to affiliates of Senior Lifestyle
Management which will account for substantially all of our
revenues.
|
|
Ø
|
Due to our concentration in senior housing, a downturn in the
senior housing or general health care industry would adversely
affect our operations and financial condition.
|
|
Ø
|
To the extent we use the net proceeds from this offering and the
concurrent private placement to make distributions to our
stockholders, the amount of cash we have available to invest in
senior housing facilities or for other purposes would be reduced.
|
|
Ø
|
We will depend on our facility operators for a significant
portion of our revenues and operating income. Any inability or
unwillingness by our facility operators to satisfy their
obligations to us under their agreements with us could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations and our
ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
|
|
|
Ø
|
There is no assurance that purchasers of common stock in this
offering will receive warrants, and, upon issuance of the
warrants, if any are issued, the exercise price of the warrants
could exceed the current market trading price of our common
stock.
|
|
|
Ø
|
If warrants are issued to purchasers of our common stock in this
offering, the dilutive effect of the warrants could have an
adverse effect on the future market price of our common stock.
|
|
|
Ø
|
Our failure to qualify, or our failure to remain qualified, as a
REIT would result in higher taxes and reduced cash available for
distribution to our stockholders.
|
OUR
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
We were formed as a Maryland corporation on April 7, 2010.
We are the sole general partner of our operating partnership,
Legacy Healthcare Properties, LP, the subsidiary through which
we will conduct substantially all of our operations and make
substantially all of our investments. Upon completion of this
offering and the concurrent private placement, we will
contribute to our operating partnership the net proceeds of this
offering and the concurrent private placement as our initial
capital contribution in exchange for units of limited
partnership interests in our operating partnership, or OP units.
In the future, we may issue OP units as consideration for the
purchase of senior housing facilities or in accordance with our
2010 Equity Incentive Plan.
7
The following chart shows our anticipated operating structure
and the anticipated ownership structure of our company following
completion of this offering and the concurrent private placement:
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes an aggregate of (i) 324,324 shares of our
common stock that certain of our executive officers have agreed
to purchase in the concurrent private placement and (ii) an
aggregate of 25,000 shares of restricted common stock that
we will grant to our director nominees pursuant to our 2010
Equity Incentive Plan upon completion of this offering.
|
8
TAX
STATUS
We intend to elect to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax
purposes commencing with our short taxable year ending on
December 31, 2010. Our qualification as a REIT will depend
upon our ability to meet, on a continuing basis, through actual
investment and operating results, various complex requirements
under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the
Code, relating to, among other things, the sources of our gross
income, the composition and values of our assets, our
distribution levels and the diversity of ownership of our
shares. We believe that we will be organized in conformity with
the requirements for qualification as a REIT under the Code and
that our intended manner of operation will enable us to meet the
requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT for
federal income tax purposes commencing with our short taxable
year ending December 31, 2010 and continuing thereafter.
As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income
tax on our taxable income that we distribute currently to our
stockholders. Under the Code, REITs are subject to numerous
organizational and operational requirements, including a
requirement that they distribute each year at least 90% of their
taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for
dividends paid and excluding any net capital gains. If we fail
to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any taxable year and do not
qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, our income for
that year will be taxed at regular corporate rates, and we will
be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable
years following the year during which we ceased to qualify as a
REIT. Even if we qualify as a REIT for federal income tax
purposes, we may still be subject to state and local taxes on
our income and assets and to federal income and excise taxes on
our undistributed income. Additionally, any income earned by our
TRS lessee and any other TRS will be fully subject to federal,
state and local corporate income tax.
In order for the income from our health care real estate
operations to constitute rents from real property
for purposes of the gross income tests required for REIT
qualification under the Code, we cannot directly operate any of
our facilities. Instead, we must lease our facilities. In some
cases, we expect to lease our facilities to our TRS lessee. Our
TRS lessee will pay rent to us that can qualify as rents
from real property, provided that the facilities leased to
the TRS lessee are treated as qualified health care
facilities and the TRS lessee engages facility operators
that are eligible independent contractors to manage
the facilities. A TRS is a corporate subsidiary of a REIT that
jointly elects with the REIT to be treated as a TRS of the REIT
and that pays federal income tax at regular corporate rates on
its taxable income. By leasing certain facilities to our TRS
lessee, we will be able to participate in the operating growth
at these facilities on an after-tax basis. Our facilities that
are not leased to our TRS lessee will generally be leased to
third-party facility operators pursuant to long-term net leases
that provide for base rent subject to annual escalators plus
percentage rent based on gross revenues or we may lease the
units at certain of the facilities directly to the residents and
provide services to those residents through a TRS. As further
described in Material Federal Income Tax
Considerations, following the completion of this offering,
our receipt of the private letter ruling from the IRS that we
intend to request confirming our ability to lease the facilities
we have under contract to our TRS lessee and the regulatory
approvals required to transfer the operating licenses for these
facilities to our TRS lessee, we intend to lease these initial
facilities to our TRS lessee. Pending receipt of these
approvals, we will enter into new leases with affiliates of
Senior Lifestyle Management, the management company that
currently operates these facilities, for Lake Barrington Woods,
Bella Terra, BaywindeCastle Pointe, Chancellors
Village and Mangrove Bay and will continue to lease the New York
assisted living facilities to affiliates of Senior Lifestyle
Management pursuant to the existing leases for these facilities.
If the IRS does not confirm our ability to use a TRS lessee for
certain of these facilities, we will either lease the units at
the facilities directly to the residents and use a TRS to
provide services to the residents or net lease the facilities to
an affiliate of Senior Lifestyle Management under a long-term
net lease that provides for the payment of base rent subject to
annual escalators as well as additional percentage rent based on
gross revenues.
9
DISTRIBUTION
POLICY
We intend to make distributions consistent with our intent to be
taxed as a REIT under the Code. We intend to make regular
quarterly distributions to our common stockholders out of funds
legally available therefor beginning at such time as our board
of directors determines that we have acquired senior housing
facilities generating sufficient cash flow to do so. Until we
invest a substantial portion of the net proceeds of this
offering and the concurrent private placement in senior housing
facilities, we expect our distributions will be nominal. We
cannot predict the timing of our senior housing facility
investments or when we will commence paying quarterly
distributions.
In order to qualify for taxation as a REIT, we intend to make
annual distributions to our stockholders of at least 90% of our
REIT taxable income each year, determined without regard to the
deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital
gains. We cannot assure you as to when we will begin to generate
sufficient cash flow to make distributions to our stockholders
or our ability to sustain those distributions. Distributions
will be authorized by our board of directors and declared by us
based upon a variety of factors deemed relevant by our
directors. Distributions to our stockholders generally will be
taxable to our stockholders as ordinary income; however, because
a significant portion of our investments will be equity
ownership interests in senior housing facilities, which will
generate depreciation and other non-cash charges against our
income, a portion of our distributions may constitute a tax-free
return of capital. To the extent consistent with maintaining our
qualification as a REIT, we may retain any earnings that
accumulate in our TRS lessee or any other TRS.
RESTRICTIONS ON
OWNERSHIP OF OUR COMMON STOCK
In order to help us qualify as a REIT, among other reasons, our
charter, subject to certain exceptions, restricts the amount of
our shares that a person may beneficially or constructively own.
Our charter provides that, subject to certain exceptions, no
person may beneficially or constructively own more than 9.8% in
value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of
the outstanding shares of any class or series of our capital
stock. Our charter also contains other restrictions on ownership
and transfer which are described under Description of
SecuritiesRestrictions on Ownership and Transfer.
Our board of directors, in its sole discretion, may
prospectively or retroactively exempt a person from the
ownership limit and certain other restrictions on ownership and
transfer in our charter and may establish or increase an
excepted holder percentage limit for such person.
The warrant agreement also contains restrictions on the number
of our warrants that a person may exercise. The warrant
agreement provides that no person may exercise a warrant if the
exercise would cause the person to beneficially or
constructively own more than 9.8% of our common stock or
otherwise violate any of the other ownership restrictions in our
charter, assuming we elect to issue shares of common stock
rather than paying cash upon exercise of the warrant.
OUR
INFORMATION
Our principal executive offices are located at 189 South Orange
Avenue, South Tower, Suite 1150, Orlando, Florida 32801.
Our telephone number is
(407) 412-9200.
We expect to maintain a website at www.LRPreit.com upon
completion of this offering. The contents of our website are not
a part of this prospectus.
10
The offering
|
|
|
Common stock we are offering
|
|
8,750,000 shares
|
|
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering and the
concurrent private placement
|
|
9,099,324 shares
(1)
|
|
Use of proceeds
|
|
We will contribute the net proceeds of this offering and the
concurrent private placement to our operating partnership. Our
operating partnership will use approximately $81.9 million
of the net proceeds to fund the cash portion of the
$240.0 million contractual purchase price for the six
senior housing facilities that we currently have under contract,
and approximately $3.0 million to pay the closing costs
related to the acquisition. Our operating partnership will use
the remaining net proceeds to invest in additional senior
housing facilities in accordance with our investment strategy
described in this prospectus and for general business purposes.
Prior to the full investment of the remaining net proceeds in
senior housing facilities, we intend to invest the remaining net
proceeds in interest-bearing, short-term securities or
money-market accounts that are consistent with our intention to
qualify as a REIT. These initial investments are expected to
provide a lower net return than we will seek to achieve from
investments in senior housing facilities. We will use
approximately $0.1 million of the net proceeds to reimburse
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred by Mr. Hutchison and his affiliates in
connection with our formation, approximately $0.6 million
to reimburse offering expenses which Mr. Hutchison has
advanced on our behalf, and approximately $0.7 million to
reimburse costs incurred by Mr. Hutchison in connection
with the acquisition of our initial portfolio, primarily the
earnest money deposit that Mr. Hutchison advanced on our
behalf. See Use of Proceeds.
|
|
Proposed NYSE common stock symbol
|
|
LRP
|
|
Contingent warrants we are offering
|
|
Up to
8,750,000 warrants
(2)
|
|
|
|
Description of contingent warrants
|
|
Upon the occurrence of the events and satisfaction of the
conditions described below, each purchaser of shares of common
stock in this offering will receive warrants to purchase an
additional amount of common stock. Each warrant, if issued,
will be exercisable for five years after the date of the
warrants issuance, or earlier upon redemption by us. The
exercise price to purchase one full share of common stock under
the warrants will be equal to the initial public offering price
of our common stock in this offering, subject to adjustment in
certain circumstances, including in the event of a stock
dividend, or recapitalization, reorganization, merger or
consolidation of our company. However, the warrant exercise
price will not be adjusted for issuances of our common stock at
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
a price below the warrant exercise price or for any regular
quarterly cash distributions. The amount of common stock that
each warrant will give the holder the right to purchase per
share of common stock purchased in this offering will depend on
the extent to which the
30-day
volume weighted average price (VWAP) of our common stock over
the
30-day
period commencing on the first trading day of our common stock
on the NYSE, or the
30-day
VWAP,
is below the initial public offering price per share of our
common stock. The events that must occur and the conditions that
must be satisfied in order for purchasers of common stock in
this offering to receive warrants are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ø
Warrants
will only be issuable if (i) the
30-day
VWAP
of our common stock is below the initial public offering price
and (ii) the warrants are approved for listing, subject to
official notice of issuance, on the NYSE or NYSE Amex.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ø
If
the
30-day
VWAP is below the initial public offering price and the warrants
are so approved, each purchaser of our common stock in the
initial public offering will receive one warrant for each share
of our common stock that it purchased in the initial public
offering and that it holds continuously throughout such
30-day
period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ø
The
actual number of shares that each warrant will give the holder
the right to purchase in respect of each qualifying share held
by a qualifying stockholder will be determined based on the
extent to which the
30-day
VWAP
is below the initial public offering price, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of warrant
shares to be issued
|
|
30-day
VWAP
(a)
|
|
in respect of
each qualifying
share
(b)(c)
|
|
|
|
|
$18.50
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
$18.25
|
|
|
0.060
|
|
$18.00
|
|
|
0.125
|
|
$17.75
|
|
|
0.200
|
|
$17.50
|
|
|
0.275
|
|
$17.25
|
|
|
0.350
|
|
$17.00
|
|
|
0.425
|
|
$16.75
|
|
|
0.525
|
|
$16.50
|
|
|
0.625
|
|
$16.25
|
|
|
0.750
|
|
$16.00
|
|
|
0.875
|
|
$15.75 or below
|
|
|
1.000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Based on an assumed initial public offering price of
$18.50 per share, the midpoint of the initial public offering
price range shown on the cover of this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) If the
30-day
VWAP
is between two of the
30-day
VWAP
data points shown above, the number of shares that will be
issuable pursuant to each warrant will be
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
determined by a straight-line interpolation between the two
VWAP data points (rounded to the nearest one-hundredth of a
share).
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) A minimum of 200,000 warrants will be issued to
satisfy the applicable NYSE Amex listing standards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ø
Purchasers
who are eligible to receive warrants must complete, sign and
return a contingent warrant issuance form to us, in which they,
among other things, represent and warrant as to the number of
shares of common stock that they purchased in this offering, the
number of shares that they have held for the full
30-day
period commencing on the first trading day of our common stock
on the NYSE and that they have not, directly or indirectly,
sold, offered, contracted or granted any option to sell
(including without limitation any short sale), pledged,
transferred, established an open put equivalent position on, or
otherwise disposed of, or publicly announced an intention to do
any of the foregoing, with respect to any of the shares held for
the full
30-day
period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ø
Assuming
one share of our common stock is issuable upon exercise of each
warrant, all purchasers of common stock in the initial public
offering hold all of their shares for the full
30-day
period and we do not exercise our option to pay cash in lieu of
issuing shares upon exercise of warrants, the maximum number of
shares of common stock that could be issued upon full exercise
of all possible warrants is 8,750,000 shares (or, in the
event the underwriters exercise their overallotment option in
full, 10,062,500 shares). See Description of
SecuritiesContingent Warrants.
|
|
|
|
Option to pay cash in lieu of issuing shares upon exercise of
warrants
|
|
Upon the valid exercise of a warrant, we have the right, but not
the obligation, to pay cash in an amount equal to the fair
market value of the shares of common stock that are issuable to
the holder as a result of the exercise.
|
|
|
|
Redemption of contingent warrants
|
|
At any time while the warrants are exercisable and there is an
effective registration statement covering the shares of our
common stock that are issuable upon exercise of the warrants
available and a current prospectus relating to the shares of
common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants available
for use by the holders of the warrants, we may call all
outstanding warrants for redemption, in whole and not in part,
at a price of $0.01 per warrant upon not less than
30 days prior written notice of redemption to each
warrant holder and the warrant agent if, and only if, the
reported last sale price of our common stock equals or exceeds
$27.75 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30
trading day period ending on the third business day prior to but
not including the date on which notice of redemption is
delivered to warrant holders and the warrant agent. We will call
the warrants for redemption by mailing a notice of redemption to
each warrant holder and the
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
warrant agent. We will also announce the redemption, including
the specified redemption date, at the time of mailing of the
notice of redemption by filing a Current Report on
Form 8-K. The right to exercise will be forfeited unless
the warrants are exercised prior to the date specified in the
notice of redemption.
|
|
|
|
Warrant agent
|
|
Mellon Investor Services LLC
|
|
Proposed NYSE or NYSE Amex warrant symbol
|
|
LRP WS
|
|
Ownership and transfer restrictions
|
|
Our charter, subject to certain exceptions, limits beneficial
and constructive ownership to no more than 9.8% by value or
number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the
outstanding shares of any class or series of our capital stock.
See Description of SecuritiesRestrictions on
Ownership and Transfer.
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
As of the date of this prospectus, we have a total of
1,000 shares of common stock outstanding. We sold these
shares to Mr. Hutchison in connection with our formation
and initial capitalization for total consideration of $1,000. At
the closing of this offering, we will repurchase these shares
from Mr. Hutchison for $1,000. Accordingly, the
1,000 shares of common stock that we currently have
outstanding are excluded from the number of shares of our common
stock to be outstanding immediately after the closing of this
offering. The number of shares to be outstanding immediately
after the closing of this offering includes:
|
|
|
|
|
Ø
|
shares of our common stock that we are offering in this
offering;
|
|
|
Ø
|
an aggregate of 324,324 shares of our common stock that
our executive officers have agreed to purchase in the concurrent
private placement; and
|
|
|
Ø
|
an aggregate of 25,000 shares of restricted common stock
that will be granted to our director nominees pursuant to our
2010 Equity Incentive Plan upon completion of this offering.
|
The number of shares of our common stock outstanding
immediately after the closing of this offering excludes:
|
|
|
|
Ø
|
1,312,500 shares of our common stock issuable pursuant
to the exercise of the underwriters overallotment
option;
|
|
|
Ø
|
any shares of common stock that may be issued upon the
exercise of warrants that may be issued in connection with this
offering; and
|
|
|
Ø
|
any additional shares that are available for future issuance
under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
The number of contingent warrants we are offering assumes no
exercise of the underwriters overallotment option.
|
14
Summary pro forma
financial and other data
The following summary pro forma condensed consolidated balance
sheet data as of June 30, 2010 has been prepared to reflect
adjustments to our historical consolidated balance sheet to
illustrate the estimated effect of the following transactions as
if they had occurred on June 30, 2010:
(i) the initial public offering of
8,750,000 shares of our common stock for an assumed initial
public offering price of $18.50 per share, which is the midpoint
of the initial public offering price range shown on the cover of
this prospectus net of the underwriting discounts and
commissions, and the offering of warrants to purchase up to an
additional 8,750,000 shares of our common stock, which
warrants would be issued only to investors who purchase shares
of common stock in this offering if certain events occur and
certain conditions are satisfied;
(ii) the concurrent private placement of
324,324 shares of our common stock to certain of our
executive officers for an assumed purchase price of $18.50 per
share, without payment of any placement fee;
(iii) the acquisition, following the closing of this
offering and the concurrent private placement, of the six senior
housing facilities we have under contract for approximately
$81.9 million in cash, funded from the net proceeds of this
offering and the concurrent private placement, the assumption of
approximately $158.1 million of long-term indebtedness, the
payment of approximately $3.0 million of closing costs and
the assumption of approximately $15.7 million of deposit
liabilities relating to deferred and refundable resident
entrance fees associated with the six facilities; and
(iv) the grant pursuant to our 2010 Equity Incentive
Plan of an aggregate of 25,000 shares of restricted common stock
to our director nominees upon completion of this offering and
the concurrent private placement.
The following summary pro forma condensed consolidated operating
data for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and the year
ended December 31, 2009 has been prepared to illustrate the
estimated effect of the transactions described in items
(i) through (iv) above, assuming such transactions
were completed on January 1, 2009, and also includes our
anticipated operating costs and estimated payments under the
proposed leases with affiliates of Senior Lifestyle Management
for Lake Barrington Woods, Bella Terra, BaywindeCastle
Pointe, Chancellors Village and Mangrove Bay and the
existing leases with affiliates of Senior Lifestyle Management
for the New York assisted living facilities. The summary pro
forma financial information and other data does not reflect the
impact of the TRS lessee structure.
The following summary pro forma financial and other data should
be read in conjunction with (i) our historical audited
consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto
appearing elsewhere in this prospectus, (ii) our unaudited pro
forma financial statements and the notes thereto appearing
elsewhere in this prospectus, (iii) the historical audited
and unaudited consolidated financial statements of WSL
Holdings IV, LLC, which we refer to as WSL IV, and the
notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this prospectus,
(iv) the historical audited and unaudited financial
statements of Senior Lifestyle Jupiter, L.P., which we refer to
as SL Jupiter, and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in
this prospectus, and (v) the Risk Factors,
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements, and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
sections in this prospectus. We have based our unaudited pro
forma adjustments on available information and assumptions that
we believe are reasonable. The following summary pro forma
financial and other data are presented for informational
purposes only and do not purport to be indicative of our results
of operations or financial condition even if the various events
and transactions reflected therein had occurred on the dates, or
been in effect during the periods indicated. The following
summary pro forma financial and other data should not be viewed
as indicative of our future results of operations or financial
condition.
15
The following table presents our unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated balance sheet data as of June 30, 2010 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Health care properties
|
|
$
|
257,155
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
72,257
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
330,992
|
|
Long term debt
|
|
|
158,075
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
330,992
|
|
The following table presents our unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated operating data for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009 (in
thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
six months
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
year ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income
|
|
$
|
8,619
|
|
|
$
|
17,140
|
|
Net residence services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
8,619
|
|
|
$
|
17,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits
|
|
|
1,362
|
|
|
|
2,676
|
|
Real estate taxes and insurance
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
984
|
|
Property acquisition costs
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,321
|
|
|
|
6,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
$
|
5,796
|
|
|
$
|
11,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income
|
|
|
2,823
|
|
|
|
6,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and loan cost amortization
|
|
|
(2,119
|
)
|
|
|
(4,994
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
704
|
|
|
$
|
1,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
9,099,324
|
|
|
|
9,099,324
|
|
Other Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations
|
|
$
|
4,025
|
|
|
$
|
8,040
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
6,144
|
|
|
$
|
13,034
|
|
16
The following table presents a reconciliation of our pro forma
net income to pro forma funds from operations, or FFO, for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 and the year ended
December 31, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
six months
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
year ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
704
|
|
|
$
|
1,397
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,321
|
|
|
|
6,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations
|
|
$
|
4,025
|
|
|
$
|
8,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents a reconciliation of our pro forma
net income to our pro forma EBITDA for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
six months
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
year ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
704
|
|
|
$
|
1,397
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,321
|
|
|
|
6,643
|
|
Interest expense and loan cost amortization
|
|
|
2,119
|
|
|
|
4,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
6,144
|
|
|
$
|
13,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO and EBITDA are not financial measures computed under United
States generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. For
additional information, see Selected Pro Forma Financial
Information.
17
Risk factors
An investment in our common stock involves risks. In addition
to other information contained in this prospectus, you should
carefully consider the following risks before acquiring shares
of our common stock offered by this prospectus. The occurrence
of any of the following risks could materially and adversely
affect our business, prospects, financial condition, results of
operations, our ability to make cash distributions to our
stockholders and the market price of our common stock, which
could cause you to lose all or a significant portion of your
investment in our common stock. Some statements in this
prospectus, including statements in the following risk factors,
constitute forward-looking statements. See Cautionary Note
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.
RISKS RELATED TO
OUR BUSINESS
We have no
operating history and may not be able to successfully operate
our business or generate sufficient operating cash flows to make
or sustain distributions to our stockholders.
We were organized in April 2010 and have no operating history.
We currently own no senior housing facilities and will only
commence operations upon completion of this offering and the
concurrent private placement. Our ability to make or sustain
distributions to our stockholders will depend on many factors,
including our availability to identify attractive acquisition
opportunities that satisfy our investment criteria, our success
in completing acquisitions on favorable terms, the level and
volatility of interest rates, readily accessible short-term and
long-term financing on favorable terms, and conditions in the
financial markets, the real estate market and the economy. We
will face competition in acquiring high quality senior housing
facilities. The value of the facilities that we acquire may
decline substantially after we purchase them. Additionally, the
past performance of CNL Retirement and CNL Hotels &
Resorts, or CNL Hotels, contained herein should not be viewed as
an indication of the future performance of our company. There
can be no guarantee that we will have similar opportunities to
invest in assets that generate similar returns.
We may not be able to successfully operate our business or
implement our operating policies and strategies successfully,
which may affect our ability to make or sustain distributions to
our stockholders. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that we
will be able to generate sufficient operating cash flows to pay
our operating expenses and make distributions to our
stockholders.
We are a newly
formed company and subject to the risks of any newly established
business enterprise.
As a newly formed company, we are subject to the risks of any
newly established business enterprise, including risks that we
will be unable to attract and retain qualified personnel, create
effective operating and financial controls and systems or
effectively manage our anticipated growth, any of which could
have a material adverse effect on our business and our operating
results.
We have not yet
committed a substantial portion of the net proceeds from this
offering to any specific senior housing facilities other than
the six facilities we currently have under contract and,
therefore, you will be unable to evaluate the allocation of a
substantial amount of the net proceeds from this offering and
the concurrent private placement or the economic merits of some
of our acquisitions prior to making your investment
decision.
We have not yet committed a substantial portion of the net
proceeds from this offering to any specific senior housing
facilities other than the six facilities we currently have under
contract, and therefore, you will be unable to evaluate the
allocation of a substantial amount of the net proceeds from this
offering and the concurrent private placement or the economic
merits of some of our acquisitions prior to
18
Risk
factors
making your investment decision. As a result, we will have broad
authority to invest the net proceeds in any real estate
investments that we may identify in the future and we may use
those proceeds to make investments with which you may not agree.
In addition, our investment policies may be amended or revised
from time to time at the discretion of our board of directors,
without a vote of our stockholders. These factors will increase
the uncertainty, and thus the risk, of investing in our common
stock. Our failure to apply the net proceeds effectively or find
suitable facilities to acquire in a timely manner or on
acceptable terms could result in returns that are substantially
below expectations or result in losses.
Until appropriate investments can be identified, we intend to
invest the net proceeds in interest-bearing, short-term
securities or money-market accounts that are consistent with our
intention to qualify as a REIT. These investments are expected
to provide a lower net return than we will seek to achieve from
our investments in senior housing facilities. We may not be able
to identify senior housing facilities that meet our investment
criteria, we may not be successful in completing any investment
we identify and our investments may not produce acceptable, or
any, returns. We may be unable to invest the proceeds on
acceptable terms, or at all.
If we are unable
to timely complete the purchase of the six senior housing
facilities we currently have under contract or at all, we will
have no immediate designated use for substantially all of the
net proceeds of this offering and the concurrent private
placement, we may experience delays in locating and securing
attractive alternative investments, and we will have incurred
substantial expenses without our stockholders realizing the
expected benefits.
We intend to use a portion of the net proceeds from this
offering and the concurrent private placement to fund the cash
portion of the purchase price for the six senior housing
facilities that we currently have under contract. We cannot
assure you that we will acquire any of these facilities because
the acquisitions are subject to a variety of factors, such as
the satisfaction of closing conditions, including receipt of
certain licenses, lender consents and other third-party consents
and approvals. If we acquire any of these facilities, we must
acquire all of them. As a result, we cannot terminate the
purchase of a particular facility, even if there is a problem
with that facility, without jeopardizing our ability to acquire
the other facilities. If we are unable to complete the purchase
of the six facilities that we currently have under contract, we
will have no specific designated use for the net proceeds from
this offering and the concurrent private placement and investors
will be unable to evaluate in advance the manner in which we
invest, or the economic merits of the facilities we may
ultimately acquire with, the net proceeds.
In addition, if we do not complete the purchase of the
facilities within our anticipated time frame or at all, we may
experience delays in locating and securing attractive
alternative investments. These delays could result in our future
operating results not meeting expectations and adversely affect
our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
Furthermore, if we are unable to complete the purchase of the
six senior housing facilities we have under contract, we may
forfeit a deposit of up to $20.5 million. If we do not
complete the purchase of these facilities, other than as a
result of the failure of the sellers to satisfy their
obligations or the failure of certain other conditions precedent
to closing under the purchase agreement, we will forfeit the
deposit.
The new leases
that we intend to enter into with affiliates of Senior Lifestyle
Management and the new management agreements are subject to
lender approval and may change following the completion of this
offering in a manner that adversely affects us.
The new leases that we intend to enter into with affiliates of
Senior Lifestyle Management are subject to lender approval and
may change following the completion of this offering. If the
lender requires us to modify the terms of the new leases,
including the termination provisions, our ability to implement
the TRS lessee structure, pending receipt of the private letter
ruling discussed under Material Federal Income Tax
Considerations and the regulatory approvals required to
transfer the operating licenses, could be
19
Risk
factors
negatively impacted. The new management agreements that the
tenants of the facilities, including, if we obtain the New York
state regulatory approvals required to transfer the current
facility operators to affiliates of Senior Lifestyle Management,
the New York assisted living facilities, will enter into
with Senior Lifestyle Management are subject to lender approval
and may change following completion of this offering. Further,
if the lender requires changes to the economic terms of these
leases or management agreements, these changes may adversely
impact our financial results and cause our actual rental revenue
to differ from the expected rental revenue reflected in the pro
forma financial information included elsewhere in this
prospectus. In addition, there is a possibility that the
applicable state healthcare agencies may request modifications
to the new leases or management agreements in connection with
reviewing the operating license applications.
Our facilities
may be subject to unknown or contingent liabilities which could
cause us to incur substantial costs.
The senior housing facilities that we acquire may be subject to
unknown or contingent liabilities for which we may have no
recourse, or only limited recourse, against the sellers. In
general, the representations and warranties provided under the
transaction agreements related to our acquisition of senior
housing facilities may not survive the closing of the
transactions. While we will likely seek to require the sellers
to indemnify us with respect to breaches of representations and
warranties that survive and with respect to pre-closing
liabilities that we do not agree to assume, such indemnification
may be limited and subject to various materiality thresholds, a
significant deductible or an aggregate cap on indemnifiable
losses. For example, the purchase and sale agreement relating to
the six senior housing facilities provides that, if the closing
occurs, the liability of the seller will not, in the aggregate,
exceed $500,000 for claims arising out of breaches of the
sellers representations and warranties, in the case of the
facility located in Florida, and $1.5 million, in the case
of the other facilities. There is no guarantee that we will
recover any amounts with respect to losses due to breaches by
the sellers of their representations and warranties or arising
out of successor liability from pre-closing liabilities. In
addition, the total amount of costs and expenses that may be
incurred with respect to liabilities associated with these
facilities may exceed our expectations, and we may experience
other unanticipated adverse effects, all of which may adversely
affect our financial condition, results of operations, the
market price of our common stock and our ability to make
distributions to our stockholders.
Our remedies will
be limited if the sellers default and fail to perform their
contractual obligations under the purchase agreement that
relates to the six senior housing facilities we currently have
under contract.
In the event that the sellers of these six senior housing
facilities that we currently have under contract fail to perform
their contractual obligations, we will have limited remedies.
For example, if the sellers default, we would have the right to
seek specific performance. In seeking specific performance, we
would face considerable delays and expense in completing the
acquisition of these facilities, if at all. Pursuing specific
performance may also prevent or delay us from identifying and
acquiring attractive alternative investments in which to invest
the net proceeds from this offering and the concurrent private
placement. If we were to elect to terminate the agreement in
lieu of pursuing a lawsuit, our remedies would likely be limited
to the return of our deposit and, in certain circumstances where
the sellers have acted intentionally, reimbursement of our
actual due diligence costs (not to exceed $350,000) plus, where
the sellers have acted both intentionally and in bad faith, the
additional payment to us of liquidated damages of
$1.5 million. We cannot assure you that our deposit will be
returned or the sellers will have sufficient funds to reimburse
our due diligence expenses or pay the liquidated damages.
20
Risk
factors
Our due diligence
has been limited and we are obtaining limited representations
and warranties in the purchase and sale agreement related to our
acquisition of the six senior housing facilities we have under
contract.
The purchase and sale agreement for the six senior housing
facilities contains limited representations and warranties
regarding these facilities. For example, while the sellers have
represented that they have provided all material environmental
reports prepared by third party consultants relating to the
facilities that are in their possession, the environmental
representations relating to such facilities (1) are
generally qualified by the sellers knowledge, (2) do
not specifically include violations of environmental laws by the
sellers, the entities that own or ground lease the facilities,
the tenants, or the business that manages the facilities, and
(3) do not include representations regarding remediation of
hazardous materials (including mold or infectious medical waste)
at the facilities or the properties.
We have not
obtained recent independent appraisals of the six facilities we
have under contract and there is no assurance that the purchase
price we have agreed to pay for these facilities does not exceed
their current fair market value.
We have not obtained recent independent appraisals of the six
facilities we have under contract. The most recent independent
appraisals performed on these six facilities, which were
performed more than two years ago when the current owners
obtained debt financing on the facilities, are not reflective of
the current fair market value of the facilities. There is no
assurance that the purchase price we have agreed to pay for
these facilities does not exceed their current fair market value.
There can be no
assurance that we will complete the acquisition of any of the
senior housing facilities that we have identified as potential
acquisition targets or that we will identify other senior
housing facilities for acquisition.
There can be no assurance that we will complete the acquisition
of any of the senior housing facilities that we have identified
as potential acquisition targets, including the senior housing
facility we have under non-binding letter of intent, or that we
will be able identify other acquisition targets that meet our
investment criteria. Our acquisition of the senior housing
facilities that we have identified as potential acquisition
targets, or of any other senior housing properties that we
identify in the future, will depend on, among other things, the
willingness of the parties to proceed with the contemplated
transaction and our ability to negotiate mutually satisfactory
acquisition terms with the sellers and to enter into binding
purchase and sale agreements with the sellers. Even if we do
enter into binding purchase and sale agreements, we cannot
assure you that the closing conditions under those agreements
will be satisfied and that we will close on the acquisitions.
Our inability to acquire properties in the future that satisfy
our investment criteria would have an adverse effect on our
operating results and our ability to pay dividends to our
stockholders.
We may not be
successful in identifying and completing off-market acquisitions
and other suitable acquisitions or investment opportunities,
which may impede our growth and materially adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations and our
ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
A key component of our growth strategy is to acquire senior
housing facilities before they are widely marketed by the
owners, or off-market. Facilities that are acquired
off-market are typically more attractive to us as a purchaser
because of the absence of a formal marketing process, which
could lead to higher prices. If we cannot obtain off-market deal
flow in the future, our ability to locate and acquire facilities
at attractive prices could be materially and adversely affected.
21
Risk
factors
We expect to compete for investment opportunities with entities
that may have substantially greater financial resources than we
have. These entities generally may be able to accept more risk
than we can prudently manage. This competition may generally
limit the number of suitable investment opportunities offered to
us or the number of facilities that we are able to acquire. This
competition may also increase the bargaining power of facility
owners seeking to sell to us, making it more difficult for us to
acquire new facilities on attractive terms.
Because our
management team will have broad discretion to invest the net
proceeds of this offering and the concurrent private placement,
it may make investments where the returns are substantially
below expectations or which result in net operating
losses.
Our management team will have broad discretion, within the
general investment criteria established by our board of
directors, to invest the net proceeds of this offering and the
concurrent private placement and to determine the timing of such
investments. Our management team may therefore make investments
where the returns are substantially below expectations or which
result in net losses.
Our investment
policies are subject to revision from time to time in our
boards discretion, which could diminish stockholder
returns below expectations.
Our investment policies may be amended or revised from time to
time at the discretion of our board of directors, without a vote
of our stockholders. Such discretion could result in investments
that may not yield returns consistent with investors
expectations.
We depend on the
efforts and expertise of the members of our management team and
our business would be adversely affected by the loss of their
services.
We depend on the efforts and expertise of the members of our
management team, including Mr. Hutchison, our Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Anderson, our President
and Chief Operating Officer, to execute our strategy. The loss
of the services of the members of our management team, and our
inability to find suitable replacements, would have an adverse
effect on our business.
We intend to
invest primarily in high quality private-pay senior housing
facilities, a segment of the senior housing market that is
highly competitive.
Private-pay senior housing is a competitive segment of the
senior housing industry. Our senior housing facilities will
compete on the basis of location, affordability, quality of
service, reputation and availability of alternative care
environments. Our senior housing facilities will rely on the
willingness and ability of seniors to select senior housing
options. Our facility operators may have competitors with
greater marketing and financial resources and may be able to
offer incentives or reduce fees charged to residents thereby
potentially reducing the perceived affordability of our
facilities during downturns in the economy. Additionally, the
high demand for quality caregivers in a given market could
increase the costs associated with providing care and services
to residents. These and other factors could cause the amount of
our revenue generated by private payment sources to decline or
our operating expenses to increase. In periods of weak demand,
as may occur during a general economic recession, profitability
is negatively affected by the relatively high fixed costs of
operating a senior housing facility.
22
Risk
factors
Failure of the
general economy to exhibit improvement or other events that
adversely affect the ability of seniors to afford the fees and
costs associated with living in a senior housing facility could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations and our ability to make
distributions to our stockholders.
Costs to seniors associated with senior housing facilities are
generally not reimbursable under government reimbursement
programs such as Medicaid and Medicare. Only seniors with income
or assets meeting or exceeding certain standards can typically
afford to pay our resident and service fees and, in some cases,
entrance fees. Economic downturns, softness in the housing
market, reductions or declining growth of government entitlement
programs, such as social security benefits, or stock market
volatility could adversely affect the ability of seniors to
afford the fees for our senior housing facilities. If our
facility operators are unable to retain
and/or
attract seniors with sufficient income, assets or other
resources required to pay entrance and other resident fees
charged at our senior housing facilities, our occupancy rates
could decline, which could, in turn, materially adversely affect
our business, results of operations and financial condition and
our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
The inability of
seniors to sell their homes could negatively impact occupancy
rates, revenues, cash flows and results of operations of the
facilities we acquire.
Recent housing price declines and reduced home mortgage
availability have negatively affected the U.S. housing
market, with certain geographic areas experiencing more acute
deterioration than others. Downturns in the housing markets,
such as the one we have recently experienced, could adversely
affect the ability (or perceived ability) of seniors to afford
our entrance fees and resident fees as potential residents
frequently use the proceeds from the sale of their homes to
cover the cost of these fees. Specifically, if seniors have a
difficult time selling their homes, these difficulties could
impact their ability to relocate into or finance their stays at
our facilities with private resources. If the recent volatility
in the housing market continues for a prolonged period, our
occupancy rates, revenues, cash flows and results of operations
could be negatively impacted.
Upon completion
of the acquisition of the six senior housing facilities that we
currently have under contract, all six of the facilities will be
leased to affiliates of Senior Lifestyle Management which will
account for substantially all of our revenues.
Upon completion of the acquisition of the six senior housing
facilities that we currently have under contract, all six of the
facilities will be leased to affiliates of Senior Lifestyle
Management which will account for substantially all of our
revenues. This concentration of credit risk in one facility
operator makes us more vulnerable economically than if we
entered into leases and management agreements with several
facility operators. Any adverse developments in this facility
operators business and affairs, financial strength or
ability to operate our facilities efficiently and effectively
could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations. We cannot assure you that this facility operator
will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing and
insurance coverage to enable it satisfy its lease obligations to
us or effectively and efficiently operate the six facilities we
intend to acquire with a portion of the net proceeds from this
offering and the concurrent private placement. The failure or
inability of this facility operator to satisfy its lease
obligations to us or effectively and efficiently operate these
facilities would materially reduce our revenues and net income,
which could in turn reduce the amount of our distributable cash
and cause our stock price to decline. Our pursuit of any
remedies upon a default under any agreement between us and the
facility operator may be impacted by our consideration of the
effect such remedies will have on other facilities leased to or
managed by the facility operator.
With respect to
senior housing facilities that we lease to our facility
operators, we will depend on our facility operators for a
significant portion of our revenues and operating income. Any
23
Risk
factors
inability or
unwillingness by our facility operators to satisfy their
obligations to us under their agreements with us could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations and our
ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
With respect to senior housing facilities that we lease to our
facility operators, rental income paid by our facility operators
will be a significant source of our total revenues and operating
income. Since our leases with our facility operators generally
will be net leases, we will depend on our facility operators not
only for rental income, but also to pay insurance, taxes,
utilities and maintenance and repair expenses in connection with
the leased facilities. Any inability or unwillingness by our
facility operators to make rental payments to us or to otherwise
satisfy their obligations under their agreements with us could
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and
our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. Any
failure by our facility operators to effectively conduct their
operations could adversely affect their business reputation and
ability to attract and retain residents in facilities we lease
to our facility operators. This could also have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations and our ability to
make distributions to our stockholders. We anticipate that our
leases will require our facility operators to indemnify, defend
and hold us harmless from and against various claims, litigation
and liabilities arising in connection with our facility
operators respective businesses. We cannot assure you that
our facility operators or their respective subsidiaries will
have sufficient assets, income, access to financing and
insurance coverage to enable it to satisfy these indemnification
obligations.
With respect to
senior housing facilities leased to our TRS lessee, adverse
developments in our facility operators respective
businesses, affairs or financial condition could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations and our ability to
make distributions to our stockholders.
With respect to senior housing facilities leased to our TRS
lessee, these facilities will be operated by our facility
operators pursuant to incentivized management agreements.
Although we expect our TRS lessee to have various rights as the
lessee of these facilities under these management agreements, we
will rely on our facility operators personnel, good faith,
expertise, historical performance, technical resources and
information systems, proprietary information and judgment to
manage the facilities leased to our TRS lessee efficiently and
effectively. We also will rely on our facility operators to set
resident fees, to provide accurate property-level financial
results for our facilities in a timely manner and to otherwise
operate those facilities in accordance with the terms of our
management agreements and in compliance with all applicable laws
and regulations. Various factors could cause our facility
operators costs to operate these facilities to increase.
For example, a shortage of trained personnel or general
inflationary pressures may force our facility operators to
enhance the pay and benefits packages offered to compete
effectively for such personnel, and our facility operators may
not be able to offset such added costs by increasing the rates
charged to residents. Increases in our facility operators
costs, failure on the part of our facility operators to attract
and retain qualified personnel or changes in our facility
operators management teams could adversely affect the
revenue we receive from the facilities leased to our TRS lessee
and operated by our facility operators.
Our facility
operators may be subject to significant legal actions that could
subject them to increased operating costs and substantial
uninsured liabilities, which may affect their ability to meet
their obligations to us.
Our facility operators may be subject to claims that their
services have resulted in resident injury or other adverse
effects. The insurance coverage that will be maintained by our
facility operators, whether through commercial insurance or
self-insurance, may not cover all claims made against them or
continue to be available at a reasonable cost, if at all. In
some states, insurance coverage for the risk of punitive damages
arising from professional liability and general liability claims
and/or
litigation may not, in certain cases, be available to our
facility operators due to state law prohibitions or limitations
of availability. As a result, our facility operators operating
in these states may be liable for punitive damage awards that
are either not covered or are in excess of their insurance
policy limits. From time to time, there may also be
24
Risk
factors
increases in government investigations of long-term care
providers, as well as increases in enforcement actions resulting
from these investigations. Insurance is not available to cover
such losses. Any adverse determination in a legal proceeding or
government investigation, whether currently asserted or arising
in the future, could lead to potential termination from
government programs, large penalties and fines and otherwise
have a material adverse effect on a facility operators
financial condition. If a facility operator is unable to obtain
or maintain insurance coverage, if judgments are obtained in
excess of the insurance coverage, if a facility operator is
required to pay uninsured punitive damages, or if a facility
operator is subject to an uninsurable government enforcement
action, the facility operator could be exposed to substantial
additional liabilities, which could result in its bankruptcy or
insolvency or have a material adverse effect on a facility
operators business and its ability to meet its obligations
to us.
Moreover, advocacy groups that monitor the quality of care at
senior housing facilities have sued senior housing facility
operators and called upon state and federal legislators to
enhance their oversight of trends in senior housing facility
ownership and quality of care. Patients have also sued senior
housing facility operators and have, in certain cases, succeeded
in winning very large damage awards for alleged abuses. This
litigation and potential litigation in the future will
materially increase the costs incurred by our facility operators
for monitoring and reporting quality of care compliance. In
addition, the cost of medical malpractice and liability
insurance has increased and may continue to increase so long as
the present litigation environment affecting the operations of
senior housing facilities continues. Increased costs could limit
our facility operators ability to meet their obligations
to us, potentially decreasing our revenue and increasing our
collection and litigation costs. To the extent we are required
to remove or replace a facility operator, our revenue from the
affected facility could be reduced or eliminated for an extended
period of time.
Finally, if we lease a senior housing facility to our TRS lessee
rather than leasing the facility to a facility operator, our TRS
lessee will become subject to state licensing requirements that
apply to senior housing facility operators and our TRS lessee
will have increased liability resulting from events or
conditions that occur at the facility, including for example
injuries to residents at the facility that are caused by the
negligence or misconduct of the facility operator or its
employees. Insurance may not cover all such liabilities.
We face potential
adverse consequences of bankruptcy or insolvency by our facility
operators.
We are exposed to the risk that our facility operators could
become bankrupt or insolvent. This risk would be magnified to
the extent that a facility operator leased or managed multiple
facilities. The bankruptcy and insolvency laws afford certain
rights to a party that has filed for bankruptcy or
reorganization. For example, a debtor-lessee may reject its
lease with us in a bankruptcy proceeding. In such a case, our
claim against the debtor-lessee for unpaid and future rents
would be limited by the statutory cap of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code. This statutory cap might be
substantially less than the remaining rent actually owed under
the lease, and it is quite likely that any claim we might have
for unpaid rent would not be paid in full. In addition, a
debtor-lessee may assert in a bankruptcy proceeding that its
lease should be re-characterized as a financing agreement. If
such a claim is successful, our rights and remedies as a lender,
compared to a landlord, would generally be more limited.
Similarly, if a debtor-manager seeks bankruptcy protection, the
automatic stay provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code would
preclude us from enforcing our remedies against the manager
unless relief is first obtained from the court having
jurisdiction over the bankruptcy case.
25
Risk
factors
Restrictive
covenants in our management agreements could preclude us from
taking actions with respect to the sale or refinancing of a
senior housing facility that would otherwise be in our best
interest.
We may enter into management agreements that contain some
restrictive covenants or acquire facilities subject to existing
management agreements that do not allow us the flexibility to
sell or refinance our senior housing facilities without the
consent of or obligation to the facility operator. For example,
the terms of some management agreements may require that we pay
the facility manager a termination fee or a buy-out fee if we or
the buyer wishes to terminate the management agreement upon the
sale of a facility or may restrict our ability to sell a
facility unless the purchaser is not a competitor of the
facility operator and assumes the related management agreement
and meets specified other conditions. If we enter into any such
management agreements, or acquire facilities with such terms, we
may be precluded from taking actions that would otherwise be in
our best interest or could cause us to incur substantial expense.
We may have only
limited rights to terminate our management agreements with our
facility operators, and we may be unable to replace our facility
operators if our management agreements are terminated or not
renewed.
Various legal and contractual considerations may limit or delay
our exercise of any termination rights contained in the
management agreements we intend to enter into with facility
operators. In the event these management agreements are
terminated for any reason or are not renewed upon expiration of
their terms, we will have to find another facility operator for
the facilities covered by those agreements. We believe there are
a number of qualified national and regional senior housing
operators that would be interested in managing our facilities.
However, we cannot assure you that we will be able to locate
another suitable facility operator or, if we are successful in
locating such a facility operator, that such facility operator
will manage the properties effectively and efficiently. Any such
inability or lengthy delay in replacing a facility operator
following termination or non-renewal of our management
agreements could have a material adverse effect on our results
of operations and our ability to make distributions to our
stockholders.
If we are unable
to successfully manage our growth, our operating results and
financial condition could be adversely affected.
Our ability to grow our business will depend upon our management
teams business contacts and their ability to successfully
hire, train, supervise and manage additional personnel,
including the team of dedicated asset managers that we intend to
employ following completion of this offering. We may not be able
to hire and train sufficient personnel or develop management,
information and operating systems suitable for our expected
growth. If we are unable to manage any future growth
effectively, our operating results and financial condition could
be adversely affected.
Our TRS lessee
structure subjects us to the risk of increased operating
expenses.
Our TRS lessee will engage facility operators pursuant to
management agreements and will pay these managers a fee for
operating the facilities and reimburse certain expenses paid by
these managers; however, the TRS lessee will receive all the
operating profit or losses at the facility, net of corporate
income tax, and we will be subject to the risk of increased
operating expenses.
26
Risk
factors
We will be
exposed to various operational risks, liabilities and claims
with respect to our senior housing facilities that may adversely
affect our ability to generate revenues and/or increase our
costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our results
of operations, the market price of our common stock and our
ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
Through our ownership of senior housing facilities, we will be
exposed to various operational risks, liabilities and claims
with respect to our facilities. These risks include fluctuations
in occupancy levels, the inability to achieve economic resident
fees (including anticipated increases in those fees), rent
control regulations, increases in costs of materials, energy,
labor (as a result of unionization or otherwise) and services,
national and regional economic conditions, the imposition of new
or increased taxes, capital expenditure requirements,
professional and general liability claims and the availability
and costs of professional and general liability insurance. Any
one or a combination of these factors could result in operating
deficiencies at our senior housing facilities, which could have
a material adverse effect on our facility operators
results of operations and their ability to meet their
obligations to us and operate our facilities effectively and
efficiently, which in turn could adversely affect our financial
condition, results of operations, the market price of our common
stock and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
Our ability to
make distributions to our stockholders is subject to
fluctuations in our financial performance, operating results and
unanticipated capital improvements requirements.
To qualify for taxation as a REIT, we will be required to
distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (determined
before the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net
capital gains) each year to our stockholders, and we generally
expect to make distributions in excess of such amount. To the
extent we satisfy the 90% distribution requirement but
distribute less than 100% of our taxable income, we will be
subject to federal income tax on the retained taxable income. In
the event of downturns in our operating results, unanticipated
capital improvements to our senior housing facilities or other
factors we may be unable to declare or pay distributions to our
stockholders. The timing and amount of distributions are in the
sole discretion of our board of directors which will consider,
among other factors, our financial performance, any debt service
obligations, any debt covenants, and capital expenditure
requirements. We cannot assure you that we will generate
sufficient cash in order to fund distributions.
We may rely on
credit enhancements to our leases for minimum rent
payments.
Our leases may have credit enhancement provisions, such as
guarantees or shortfall reserves provided by a third-party.
These credit enhancement provisions may terminate at either a
specific time during the lease term or once operating thresholds
are met or exceeded. After the termination of a credit
enhancement, we may only look to the facility operator to make
lease payments, and if our facilities are unable to generate
sufficient cash flow to meet minimum rent payments and the
facility operator does not otherwise have the resources to make
rent payments, our results of operations, financial performance
and distributions to stockholders could be adversely affected.
We may make
distributions to our stockholders before we have fully invested
the net proceeds from this offering and the concurrent private
placement, which would, among other things, reduce our cash
available to invest in senior housing facilities and may reduce
the returns we are able to generate for our
stockholders.
Prior to the time we have fully invested the net proceeds of
this offering and the concurrent private placement, we may fund
distributions to our stockholders for the purpose of satisfying
the requirements for qualification as a REIT for federal income
tax purposes, or for any other authorized corporate purpose. We
may use cash on hand which may include cash flow from operations
or net proceeds of
27
Risk
factors
this offering and the concurrent private placement. In such an
event, it is possible that we could make distributions in excess
of our earnings and profits and thereby reduce our funds
available to invest in senior housing facilities, which may
adversely affect our financial results and reduce the returns on
your investment in our common stock. In addition, funding such
distributions may constitute a return of capital to our
stockholders, which could have the effect of reducing each
stockholders tax basis in our common stock.
Our future growth
depends on obtaining new financing and if we cannot obtain
financing in the future, our growth will be limited.
We may not be able to fund acquisitions and capital improvements
solely from cash provided from our operating activities because
we must distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT
taxable income (determined before the deduction for dividends
paid and excluding any net capital gains) each year to satisfy
the requirements for qualification as a REIT for federal income
tax purposes. As a result, our ability to fund acquisitions and
capital improvements through retained earnings will be limited.
Our ability to generate external growth by acquiring senior
housing facilities will be limited if we cannot obtain
satisfactory debt or equity financing, which will depend on
capital markets conditions. We cannot assure you that we will be
able to obtain additional equity or debt financing or that we
will be able to obtain such financing on favorable terms.
Specifically, while we intend to seek to arrange a credit
facility to fund investments and operating activities following
the investment of the net proceeds of this offering, we have no
commitment from any lender at the current time and there can be
no assurance that we will be able to arrange a credit facility
in the future on acceptable terms, or at all.
Our debt service
obligations could adversely affect our overall operating
results, may require us to sell facilities, may jeopardize our
qualification as a REIT and could adversely affect our ability
to make distributions to our stockholders and the market price
of our common stock.
In connection with the acquisition of the six senior housing
facilities that we have under contract, we expect to assume an
aggregate of approximately $158.1 million of in-place
mortgage debt. These mortgage loans mature on June 1, 2013.
Although the in-place mortgage debt is made up of individual
mortgage loans related to the individual facilities, most of the
mortgage loans contain cross-default and cross-collateralization
provisions which means that a default under any one of the loans
could trigger a default under the other loans. Furthermore, our
business strategy generally contemplates the use of both secured
and unsecured debt to finance long-term growth. Our governing
documents contain no limitations on the amount of debt that we
can incur and our board of directors may approve increases in
our leverage at any time without stockholder approval. As a
result, we may be able to incur substantial additional debt,
including secured debt, in the future. Incurring debt could
subject us to many risks, including the risks that:
|
|
Ø
|
our operating cash flow will be insufficient to make required
payments of principal and interest;
|
|
Ø
|
our leverage may increase our vulnerability to adverse economic
and industry conditions;
|
|
Ø
|
we may be required to dedicate a substantial portion of our
operating cash flow from operations to payments on our debt,
thereby reducing cash available for distribution to our
stockholders, funds available for operations and capital
expenditures, future business opportunities or other purposes;
|
|
Ø
|
the terms of any refinancing we seek may not be as favorable as
the terms of the debt being refinanced; and
|
|
Ø
|
the terms of our debt may limit our ability to make
distributions to our stockholders and the market price of our
common stock.
|
28
Risk
factors
If we violate covenants in our debt agreements, we could be
required to repay all or a portion of our indebtedness before
maturity at a time when we might be unable to arrange financing
for such repayment on attractive terms, if at all.
If we are unable
to repay our debt obligations in the future, we may be forced to
refinance debt or dispose of or encumber our assets, which could
adversely affect distributions to stockholders.
If we do not have sufficient funds to repay the debt we expect
to assume in connection with our acquisition of the six senior
housing facilities we have under contract or any other debt we
incur in the future at maturity, or before maturity in the event
we breach our debt agreements and our lenders exercise their
right accelerate repayment, it may be necessary to refinance the
debt through additional debt or equity financings. If we are
unable to refinance our debt on acceptable terms, we may be
forced to dispose of senior housing facilities on
disadvantageous terms, potentially resulting in losses. We may
place mortgages on senior housing facilities that we acquire to
secure a revolving credit facility or other debt. To the extent
we cannot meet any future debt service obligations, we will risk
losing some or all of our senior housing facilities that may be
pledged to secure our obligations to foreclosure. Adverse
economic conditions could also cause the terms on which we
borrow to be unfavorable. We could be required to liquidate one
or more of our senior housing facilities in order to meet our
debt service obligations at times which may not permit us to
receive an attractive return on our investments.
Interest expense
on any debt we incur may limit our cash available for
distribution to our stockholders.
The debt we expect to assume in connection with our acquisition
of the six senior housing facilities we have under contract
bears interest at a variable rate and we may incur additional
variable rate debt in the future. Higher interest rates could
increase debt service requirements on any variable rate debt
that we incur and could reduce the amounts available for
distribution to our stockholders, as well as reduce funds
available for our operations, future business opportunities, or
other purposes.
Failure to hedge
effectively against interest rate changes may adversely affect
our results of operations and our ability to make distributions
to our stockholders.
To the extent consistent with our intention to qualify as a REIT
for federal income tax purposes, we may obtain in the future one
or more forms of interest rate protectionin the form of
swap agreements, interest rate cap contracts or similar
agreementsto hedge against the possible
negative effects of interest rate fluctuations. For example, in
connection with our assumption of the in-place mortgage debt
that is secured by the six senior housing facilities we have
under contract, we will be required to obtain an interest rate
cap. However, such hedging implies costs and we cannot assure
you that any hedging will adequately relieve the adverse effects
of interest rate increases or that counterparties under these
agreement will honor their obligations thereunder.
Joint venture
investments that we make could be adversely affected by our lack
of sole decision-making authority, our reliance on joint venture
partners financial condition and disputes between us and
our joint venture partners.
We may co-invest in senior housing facilities with third parties
through partnerships, joint ventures or other entities,
acquiring non-controlling interests in or sharing responsibility
for managing the affairs of a senior housing facility,
partnership, joint venture or other entity. In this event, we
would not be in a position to exercise sole decision-making
authority regarding the facility, partnership, joint venture or
other entity. Investments through partnerships, joint ventures,
or other entities may, under certain circumstances, involve
risks not present were a third party not involved, including the
possibility that
29
Risk
factors
joint venture partners might become bankrupt, fail to fund their
share of required capital contributions, make poor business
decisions or block or delay necessary decisions. Joint venture
partners may have economic or other business interests or goals
which are inconsistent with our business interests or goals, and
may be in a position to take actions contrary to our policies or
objectives. Such investments may also have the potential risk of
impasses on decisions, such as a sale, because neither we nor
our joint venture partners would have full control over the
partnership or joint venture. Disputes between us and our joint
venture partners may result in litigation or arbitration that
would increase our expenses and prevent the members of our
management team from focusing its time and effort on our
business. Consequently, action by, or disputes with, our joint
venture partners might result in subjecting the facilities owned
by the partnership or joint venture to additional risk. In
addition, we may in certain circumstances be liable for the
actions of our joint venture partners.
Unanticipated
expenses and insufficient demand for senior housing facilities
in new geographic markets could adversely affect our
profitability and our ability to make distributions to our
stockholders.
As part of our business strategy, we may acquire senior housing
facilities in geographic areas in which the members of our
management team may have little or no operating experience and
in which potential customers may not be familiar with benefits
of and care provided by that particular facility. As a result,
we may have to incur costs relating to the opening, operation
and promotion of such facilities that are substantially greater
than those incurred in other areas. These facilities may attract
fewer residents than other senior housing facilities we may
acquire, while at the same time, we may incur substantial
additional costs with such facilities. As a result, the results
of operations at any facilities that we may acquire in
unfamiliar markets may be less than those of other senior
housing facilities that we may acquire. Unanticipated expenses
and insufficient demand could adversely affect our financial
condition and results of operations.
The conflicts of
interest policy we will adopt may not adequately address all of
the conflicts of interest that may arise with respect to our
activities.
In order to avoid any actual or perceived conflicts of interest
with our directors, officers or employees, we intend to adopt a
conflicts of interest policy to specifically address some of the
conflicts relating to our activities. Although under this policy
the approval of a majority of our disinterested directors will
be required to approve any transaction, agreement or
relationship in which any of our directors, officers or
employees has an interest, there is no assurance that this
policy will be adequate to address all of the conflicts that may
arise or will address such conflicts in a manner that is
favorable to us. In addition, our current board of directors
consists only of Mr. Hutchison, and as a result, the
transactions and agreements entered into in connection with our
formation prior to this offering and the concurrent private
placement have not been approved by any independent or
disinterested directors.
RISKS RELATED TO
THE SENIOR HOUSING INDUSTRY
Our failure or
the failure of our facility operators to comply with licensing
and certification requirements, the requirements of governmental
programs, fraud and abuse regulations or new legislative
developments may materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations and our ability to
make distributions to our stockholders.
The operations of our facilities are subject to numerous
federal, state and local laws and regulations that are subject
to frequent and substantial changes resulting from legislation,
adoption of rules and regulations, and administrative and
judicial interpretations of existing laws. The ultimate timing
or effect of any changes in these laws and regulations cannot be
predicted. Failure to obtain licensure or loss or suspension of
licensure or certification may prevent a facility from operating
or result in a
30
Risk
factors
suspension of certain revenue sources until all licensure or
certification issues have been resolved. Facilities may also be
affected by changes in accreditation standards or procedures of
accrediting agencies that are recognized by governments in the
certification process. State laws may require compliance with
extensive standards governing operations and agencies
administering those laws regularly inspect such facilities and
investigate complaints. Failure to comply with all regulatory
requirements could result in the loss of the ability to provide
or bill and receive payment for health care services.
Additionally, transfers of operations of senior housing
facilities are subject to regulatory approvals not required for
transfers of other types of commercial operations and real
estate. We may have no direct control over our facility
operators ability to meet regulatory requirements and
failure to comply with these laws, regulations and requirements
may materially adversely affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations and our ability to make
distributions to our stockholders.
Cost control and
other health care reform measures may reduce reimbursement
revenue available to our senior housing facilities.
The health care industry is facing various challenges, including
increased government and private payor pressure on health care
providers to control costs and the vertical and horizontal
consolidation of health care providers. The pressure to control
health care costs has intensified in recent years as a result of
the national health care reform debate and has continued as
Congress attempts to slow the rate of growth of federal health
care expenditures as part of its effort to balance the federal
budget. Similar debates are ongoing at the state level in many
states. These trends are likely to lead to reduced or slower
growth in reimbursement for services provided by our operators
at some of our senior housing facilities and could therefore
result in reduced profitability, which may have an adverse
affect on our results of operations, our ability to make
distributions to our stockholders and the market price of our
common stock.
Each year,
legislative proposals are introduced or proposed in Congress and
in some state legislatures that would effect major changes in
the health care system, nationally or at the state level. We
cannot predict whether any proposals will be adopted or, if
adopted, what effect, if any, these proposals would have on our
facility operators and, thus, our business.
Health care, including the long-term care and assisted living
sectors, remains a dynamic, evolving industry. On March 23,
2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 was
enacted and on March 30, 2010, the Health Care and
Education Reconciliation Act was enacted, which in part modified
the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Together, the
two Acts serve as the primary vehicle for comprehensive health
care reform in the United States. The two Acts are intended to
reduce the number of individuals in the United States without
health insurance and effect significant other changes to the
ways in which health care is organized, delivered and
reimbursed. The legislation will become effective in a phased
approach, beginning in 2010 and concluding in 2018. At this
time, the effects of the legislation and its impact on our
business are not yet known. Our business, results of operations
and ability to pay cash distributions to our stockholders could
be materially and adversely effected by the two Acts and further
governmental initiatives undertaken pursuant to the two Acts.
Current economic
conditions may reduce demand for senior housing facilities and
adversely affect operating profitability.
The performance of the senior housing industry is linked to the
performance of the general economy and, specifically, the
housing market in the United States. It is also sensitive to
personal wealth and available fixed income of seniors and their
adult children. Declines in home values, consumer confidence and
net worth due to adverse general economic conditions may reduce
demand for senior housing.
31
Risk
factors
We cannot predict how severe or prolonged the global economic
downturn will be or how the senior housing industry will be
impacted by it. A further extended period of economic weakness
would likely have an adverse impact on our revenues and
negatively affect our financial condition, results of
operations, the market price of our common stock and our ability
to make distributions to our stockholders.
Events which
adversely affect the ability of seniors to afford our daily
resident fees could cause our occupancy rates, resident fee
revenues and results of operations to decline.
In general, assisted and independent living services currently
are not reimbursable under government reimbursement programs,
such as Medicare and Medicaid. Substantially all of the resident
fee revenues generated by our facilities will be derived from
private payment sources consisting of income or assets of
residents or their family members. Only seniors with income or
assets meeting or exceeding the comparable median in the regions
where our facilities are located typically can afford to pay the
daily resident and care fees. The current economic downturn and
decline in the housing market, as well as other events such as
changes in demographics, could adversely affect the ability of
seniors to afford these fees. If our facility operators are
unable to attract and retain seniors with sufficient income,
assets or other resources required to pay the fees associated
with assisted and independent living services, our occupancy
rates, resident fee revenues and results of operations could
decline, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition, results of operations, the market price
of our common stock and our ability to make distributions to our
stockholders.
Overbuilding in
markets in which our senior housing facilities are located could
adversely affect our future occupancy rates, operating margins
and profitability.
Although we intend to target senior housing facilities in
markets that have high barriers to entry for new facilities,
barriers to entry in the senior housing industry are not
substantial in all markets. Consequently, the development of new
senior housing facilities could outpace demand. If the
development of new senior housing facilities outpaces demand for
those asset types in the markets in which our facilities are
located, those markets may become saturated. Overbuilding in our
markets, therefore, could cause us to experience decreased
occupancy, reduced operating margins and lower profitability.
Termination of
resident lease agreements could adversely affect our revenues
and earnings.
Applicable regulations governing assisted living facilities
generally require written resident lease agreements with each
resident. Most of these regulations also require that each
resident have the right to terminate the resident lease
agreement for any reason on reasonable notice or upon the death
of the resident. Our facility operators cannot contract with
residents to stay for longer periods of time, unlike typical
apartment leasing arrangements with terms of up to one year or
longer. In addition, the resident turnover rate in our
facilities may be difficult to predict. If a large number of
resident lease agreements terminate at or around the same time,
and if our units remained unoccupied, then our revenues and
earnings could be adversely affected, which, in turn, could have
a material adverse effect on us.
The Employee Free
Choice Act could substantially increase the cost of doing
business by increasing wage and benefit costs.
A number of members of the legislative and executive branches of
the Federal government have stated that they support the
Employee Free Choice Act, which, if enacted, would discontinue
the current practice of having an open process where both the
union and the employer are permitted to educate employees
regarding the pros and cons of joining a union before having an
election by secret ballot. Under the Employee Free Choice Act,
the employees would only hear the unions side of the
argument
32
Risk
factors
before making a commitment to join the union. The Employee Free
Choice Act would permit unions to quietly collect employee
signatures supporting the union without notifying the employer
and permitting the employer to explain its views before a final
decision is made by the employees. Once a union has collected
signatures from a majority of the employees, the employer would
have to recognize, and bargain with, the union. If the employer
and the union fail to reach agreement on a collective bargaining
contract within a certain number of days, both sides would be
forced to submit their respective proposals to binding
arbitration and a federal arbitrator would be permitted to
create an employment contract binding on the employer. If the
Employee Free Choice Act is enacted, a number of the senior
housing facilities we will own or seek to acquire could become
unionized.
Generally, unionized senior housing employees are subject to a
number of work rules which increase expenses and decrease
operating margins at unionized facilities. We believe that the
unionization of senior housing employees may result in a
significant decline in profitability and property value, which
could adversely affect our financial condition, results of
operations, the market price of our common stock and our ability
to make distributions to our stockholders.
GENERAL RISKS
RELATED TO REAL ESTATE
The ownership of
real estate is subject to various risks beyond our
control.
The ownership of real estate is affected by many factors beyond
our control, including:
|
|
Ø
|
adverse changes in international, national, regional and local
economic and market conditions;
|
|
Ø
|
changes in interest rates and in the availability, cost and
terms of debt financing;
|
|
Ø
|
changes in governmental laws and regulations, fiscal policies
and zoning ordinances and the related costs of compliance with
laws and regulations, fiscal policies and ordinances;
|
|
Ø
|
the ongoing need for capital improvements, particularly in older
structures;
|
|
Ø
|
changes in operating expenses; and
|
|
Ø
|
civil unrest, acts of God, including earthquakes, floods and
other natural disasters, which may result in uninsured losses,
and acts of war or terrorism.
|
We may decide to sell senior housing facilities in the future.
We cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any facility
for the price or on the terms set by us, or whether any price or
other terms offered by a prospective purchaser would be
acceptable to us. We also cannot predict the length of time
needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of a
facility.
We may be required to expend funds to correct defects or to make
improvements before a facility can be sold. We cannot assure you
that we will have funds available to correct those defects or to
make those improvements. In acquiring a senior housing facility,
we may agree to lock-out provisions that materially restrict us
from selling that facility for a period of time or impose other
restrictions, such as a limitation on the amount of debt that
can be placed or repaid on that facility. These factors and any
others that would impede our ability to respond to adverse
changes in the performance of the senior housing facilities or a
need for liquidity could adversely affect our financial
condition, results of operations, the market price of our common
stock and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
Due to our
concentration in senior housing, a downturn in the senior
housing or general health care industry would adversely affect
our operations and financial condition.
We invest primarily in real estatein particular, senior
housing facilities. This concentration exposes us to all of the
risks inherent in investments in real estate to a greater degree
than if our portfolio was diversified, and these risks are
magnified by the fact that our real estate investments are
limited to
33
Risk
factors
facilities used in the senior housing industry. If the current
downturn in the real estate industry continues or intensifies,
it could adversely affect the value of our facilities and our
ability to sell facilities for a price or on terms acceptable to
us. A downturn in the senior housing industry could negatively
impact our operating income and earnings, as well as our
facility operators ability to make rental or other
payments to us, which, in turn, could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition, results of operations, the
market price of our common stock and our ability to make
distributions to our stockholders.
Because real estate investments are relatively illiquid, our
ability to quickly sell or exchange any of our facilities in
response to changes in economic or other conditions will be
limited. We cannot give any assurances that we will recognize
full value for any facility that we are required to sell for
liquidity reasons. This inability to respond quickly to changes
in the performance of our investments could adversely affect our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
Furthermore, the health care industry is highly regulated, and
changes in government regulation and reimbursement in the past
have had material adverse consequences on the industry in
general, which consequences may not have been contemplated by
lawmakers and regulators. We cannot assure you that future
changes in government regulation of health care will not have a
material adverse effect on the health care industry, including
our senior housing operations and facility operators. These
adverse effects may be more pronounced than if we diversified
our investments outside of real estate or outside of senior
housing.
Increases in
property taxes would increase our operating costs, reduce our
income and adversely affect our ability to make distributions to
our stockholders.
Each of our senior housing facilities will be subject to real
and personal property taxes. These taxes may increase as tax
rates change and as the facilities are assessed or reassessed by
taxing authorities. If property taxes increase, our financial
condition, results of operations and our ability to make
distributions to our stockholders could be materially and
adversely affected and the market price of our common stock
could decline.
Actions by
competitors may have an adverse effect on our ability to deploy
capital.
Existing health care REITs, private funds, investment pools or
well capitalized new competitors in our sector may present
challenges and competitive bidding for projects that meet our
investment criteria. These competitive forces may reduce the
number or volume of feasible acquisition targets in the future.
Noncompliance
with environmental laws and releases of hazardous substances
could subject us to fines and liabilities, which could adversely
affect our operating results.
The senior housing facilities that we acquire will be subject to
various federal, state and local environmental laws. Under these
laws, courts and government agencies have the authority to
require us, as owner or operator of a contaminated property, to
clean up the property, even if we did not know of or were not
responsible for the release of the contamination. These laws
also apply to persons who owned or operated a property at the
time that it became contaminated, and therefore it is possible
that we could incur these costs even after we sell some of the
properties we acquire. In addition to the costs of cleanup,
environmental contamination can affect the value of a property
and, therefore, an owners ability to borrow funds using
the property as collateral or to sell the property. Under the
environmental laws, courts and government agencies also have the
authority to require that a person who sent waste to a waste
disposal facility, such as a landfill or an incinerator, pay for
the
clean-up
of that facility if it becomes contaminated and threatens human
health or the environment.
34
Risk
factors
Furthermore, various court decisions have established that third
parties may recover damages for personal injury, as well as for
damage to property and to natural resources caused by
contamination. For instance, a person exposed to asbestos while
staying in a senior housing facility may seek to recover damages
if he or she suffers personal injury from the asbestos. Lastly,
some of these environmental laws restrict the use of a property
or place conditions on various activities. An example would be
laws that require a business using chemicals (such as swimming
pool treatment chemicals at a senior housing facility) to manage
them carefully and to notify local officials that the chemicals
are being used.
We could be responsible for any of the costs discussed above.
The costs to clean up a contaminated property, to defend against
a claim, to satisfy a judgment or pay a penalty, or to comply
with environmental laws could be material and could adversely
affect the funds available for distribution to our stockholders.
We have obtained a Phase I environmental site assessment
for each of the six senior housing facilities that we have under
contract and expect to obtain Phase I environmental site
assessments for facilities we acquire in the future. Based on
these Phase I environmental site assessments and the
sellers representations in the purchase and sale agreement
related to the six senior housing facilities we have under
contract, we are not aware of any material environmental
liabilities related to these facilities. However, these
environmental site assessments may not reveal all environmental
costs that might have a material adverse effect on our business,
assets, results of operations or liquidity and may not identify
all potential environmental liabilities. For example, the
Phase I environmental site assessments did not include a
comprehensive mold investigation.
As a result, we may become subject to material environmental
liabilities. We can make no assurances that (1) future laws
or regulations will not impose material environmental
liabilities on us, or (2) the environmental condition of
our senior housing facilities will not be affected by the
condition of the properties in the vicinity of our senior
housing facilities (such as the presence of leaking underground
storage tanks on an adjacent up-gradient property) or by third
parties unrelated to us.
Our senior
housing facilities may contain or develop harmful or toxic mold,
which could lead to liability for adverse health effects and
costs of remediation.
When excessive moisture accumulates in buildings or on building
materials, mold growth may occur, particularly if the moisture
problem remains undiscovered or is not addressed over a period
of time. Some molds may produce harmful airborne toxins or
irritants. Concern about indoor exposure to mold has been
increasing as exposure to mold may cause a variety of adverse
health effects and symptoms, including allergic or other
reactions. Some of the facilities in our portfolio may contain
harmful amounts of microbial matter, such as mold and mildew.
The presence of such microbial matter at any of our properties
could require us to undertake a costly remediation program to
contain or remove the material from the affected property. The
presence of such microbial matter could also expose us to
liability from residents, employees and others if property
damage or health concerns arise.
Any mortgage debt
obligations we incur will expose us to increased risk of
property losses to foreclosure, which could adversely affect our
financial condition, cash flow and ability to satisfy our other
debt obligations and make distributions to our
stockholders.
Incurring mortgage debt increases our risk of property losses,
because any defaults on indebtedness secured by properties may
result in foreclosure actions initiated by lenders and
ultimately our loss of the property securing the loan for which
we are in default. For tax purposes, a foreclosure of any of our
facilities would be treated as a sale of the facility for a
purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt
secured by the mortgage. If the outstanding balance of the debt
secured by the mortgage exceeds our tax basis in the facility,
we would recognize taxable income on foreclosure but would not
receive any cash proceeds. As a result, we may be required to
identify and utilize other sources of cash for distributions to
our stockholders of that income.
35
Risk
factors
In addition, any default under our mortgage debt obligations may
increase the risk of our default on other indebtedness. If this
occurs, our financial condition, results of operations, the
market price of our common stock and our ability to make
distributions to our stockholders may be adversely affected.
Capital
expenditure requirements at our facilities may be costly and
require us to incur debt, postpone improvements, reduce
distributions or otherwise adversely affect the results of our
operations and the market price of our common stock.
Some of the senior housing facilities we acquire may have a need
for renovations and capital improvements at the time of
acquisition and all of the facilities we acquire will have an
ongoing need for renovations and other capital improvements,
including replacement, from time to time, of furniture, fixtures
and equipment. In addition, if we incur indebtedness, as we
intend to do in the future, our lenders will likely require that
we set aside annual amounts for capital improvements to our
properties. These capital improvements may give rise to the
following risks:
|
|
Ø
|
possible environmental problems;
|
|
Ø
|
construction cost overruns and delays;
|
|
Ø
|
the possibility that revenues will be reduced while rooms or
service elements are out of service due to capital improvement
projects;
|
|
Ø
|
a possible shortage of available cash to fund capital
improvements and the related possibility that financing for
these capital improvements may not be available to us on
attractive terms; and
|
|
Ø
|
uncertainties as to market demand or a loss of market demand
after capital improvements have begun.
|
The costs of renovations and capital improvements could
adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations,
the market price of our common stock and our ability to make
distributions to our stockholders.
Real estate
development and redevelopment is subject to timing, budgeting
and other risks that may adversely affect our financial
condition, results of operations, the market price of our common
stock and our ability to make distributions to our
stockholders.
Though not intended to be a primary focus of our initial
investment strategy, we may engage in the development and
redevelopment of senior housing facilities if suitable
opportunities arise. Development and redevelopment involves a
number of risks, including risks associated with:
|
|
Ø
|
construction delays or cost overruns that may increase project
costs;
|
|
Ø
|
the receipt of zoning, occupancy and other required governmental
permits and authorizations;
|
|
Ø
|
development costs incurred for projects that are not pursued to
completion;
|
|
Ø
|
acts of God such as earthquakes, hurricanes, floods or fires
that could adversely impact a project;
|
|
Ø
|
the negative impact of construction on operating performance
during and soon after the construction period;
|
|
Ø
|
the ability to raise capital; and
|
|
Ø
|
governmental restrictions on the nature or size of a project.
|
We may not have control over facilities under construction and
we may be subject to risks in connection with a developers
ability to control construction costs and the timing of
completion of construction or a developers ability to
build in conformity with plans, specifications and timetables.
36
Risk
factors
We cannot assure you that any development or redevelopment
project will be completed on time or within budget. Our
inability to complete a project on time or within budget could
adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations,
the market price of our common stock and our ability to make
distributions to our stockholders.
Uninsured and
underinsured losses could result in a loss of capital.
We intend to maintain comprehensive insurance on each of our
facilities, including liability, fire and extended coverage, of
the type and amount we believe are customarily obtained for or
by senior housing facility owners. There are no assurances that
coverage will be available at reasonable rates. Various types of
catastrophic losses, like earthquakes and floods, and losses
from terrorist activities may not be insurable or may not be
economically insurable. In this regard, one of the six senior
housing facilities that we currently have under contract is
located in Jupiter, Florida, which is an area that is known to
be subject to hurricane and flood risk. Further, lenders may
require such insurance and our failure to obtain such insurance
could constitute a default under loan agreements.
In the event of a substantial loss, our insurance coverage may
not be sufficient to cover the full current market value or
replacement cost of our lost investment. Should an uninsured
loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occur, we could lose
all or a portion of the capital we have invested in a senior
housing facility, as well as the anticipated future revenue from
the facility. In that event, we might nevertheless remain
obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations
related to the facility. Inflation, changes in building codes
and ordinances, environmental considerations and other factors
might also keep us from using insurance proceeds to replace or
renovate a senior housing facility after it has been damaged or
destroyed. Under those circumstances, the insurance proceeds we
receive might be inadequate to restore our economic position on
the damaged or destroyed facility.
Compliance with
the Americans with Disabilities Act could require us to incur
substantial costs.
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or the ADA,
all public accommodations must meet various federal requirements
related to access and use by disabled persons. Compliance with
the ADAs requirements could require removal of access
barriers, and non-compliance could result in the
U.S. government imposing fines or in private litigants
winning damages. In June 2008, the Department of Justice
proposed a substantial number of changes to the Accessibility
Guidelines under the ADA. In January 2010, final publication and
implementation of these regulations, pending a comprehensive
review by the current administration, was suspended. If
implemented as proposed, the new guidelines could cause some of
the senior housing facilities we acquire to incur costly
measures to become fully compliant. If we are required to make
substantial modifications to facilities we acquire, whether to
comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, or the ADA, or
other changes in governmental rules and regulations, our
financial condition, results of operations, the market price of
our common stock and our ability to make distributions to our
stockholders could be adversely affected.
We may incur
significant unexpected costs to comply with fire, safety and
other regulations, which could adversely impact our financial
condition, results of operations, and ability to make
distributions.
The senior housing facilities that we acquire are subject to
various additional federal, state and local regulatory
requirements, such as state and local fire and safety
requirements, building codes and land use regulations. If we
fail to comply with these requirements, we could be subject to
governmental fines or private damage awards. We believe that the
six senior housing facilities we currently have under contract
are currently in material compliance with all applicable
regulatory requirements. However, we do not know whether
existing requirements will change or whether future
requirements, including any requirements that may emerge from
pending or future climate change legislation, will require us to
37
Risk
factors
make significant unanticipated expenditures that will adversely
impact our financial condition, results of operations, cash
flow, the per share trading price of our common stock, our
ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and our ability
to pay distributions to you.
RISKS RELATED TO
OUR ORGANIZATION AND STRUCTURE
Provisions of our
charter may limit the ability of a third party to acquire
control of us by authorizing our board of directors to authorize
issuances of additional securities.
Upon completion of this offering and the concurrent private
placement, our charter will authorize our board of directors to
issue up to 500 million shares of common stock and up
to 100 million shares of preferred stock. In addition,
our board of directors may, without stockholder approval, amend
our charter to increase or decrease the aggregate number of our
shares or the number of shares of any class or series that we
have the authority to issue and to classify or reclassify any
unissued shares of common stock or preferred stock and to set
the preferences, rights and other terms of the classified or
reclassified shares. As a result, our board of directors may
authorize the issuance of additional shares or establish a
series of common or preferred stock that may have the effect of
delaying or preventing a change in control of our company,
including transactions at a premium over the market price of our
shares, even if stockholders believe that a change in control is
in their interest.
We are subject to
anti-takeover provisions, which may have the effect of delaying,
deferring or preventing a transaction or change in control of
our company.
Our charter and bylaws contain various procedural and other
requirements which could make it difficult for stockholders to
effect certain corporate actions. For example, our board of
directors has the power to increase or decrease the aggregate
number of authorized shares of our stock or the number of
authorized shares of any class or series of our stock, to cause
us to issue additional shares of common stock or preferred stock
and to fix the terms of one or more classes or series of our
stock without stockholder approval. These provisions, along with
the restrictions on ownership and transfer contained in our
charter and certain provisions of Maryland law described below,
could discourage unsolicited acquisition proposals or make it
more difficult for a third party to gain control of us, which
could adversely affect the market price of our securities. See
Certain Provisions of Maryland Law and of Our Charter and
Bylaws.
Provisions of
Maryland law may limit the ability of a third party to acquire
control of us by requiring our board of directors or
stockholders to approve proposals to acquire our company or
effect a change in control.
Certain provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law, or
the MGCL, applicable to Maryland corporations may have the
effect of inhibiting a third party from making a proposal to
acquire us or of impeding a change in control under
circumstances that otherwise could provide our common
stockholders with the opportunity to realize a premium over the
then-prevailing market price of such shares, including:
|
|
Ø
|
business combination provisions that, subject to
limitations, prohibit certain business combinations between us
and an interested stockholder (defined generally as
any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power
of our outstanding voting stock or an affiliate or associate of
us who, at any time within the two-year period immediately prior
to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more
of the voting power of our then outstanding stock) or an
affiliate of any interested stockholder for five years after the
most recent date on which the stockholder becomes an interested
stockholder, and thereafter imposes two super-majority
stockholder voting requirements on these combinations, unless,
among other conditions, our common stockholders
|
38
Risk
factors
|
|
|
receive a minimum price, as defined in the MGCL, for their stock
and the consideration is received in cash or in the same form as
previously paid by the interested stockholder for its shares; and
|
|
|
Ø
|
control share provisions that provide that holders
of control shares (defined as voting shares of stock
which, when aggregated with all other shares of stock controlled
by the stockholder, entitle the stockholder to exercise one of
three increasing ranges of voting power in electing directors)
acquired in a control share acquisition (defined as
the direct or indirect acquisition of ownership or control of
issued and outstanding control shares) have no
voting rights except to the extent approved by our stockholders
by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all the votes
entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding shares owned by the
acquirer, by our officers or by our employees who are also
directors of our company.
|
By resolution of our board of directors, we have opted out of
the business combination provisions of the MGCL and provided
that any business combination between us and any other person is
exempt from the business combination provisions of the MGCL,
provided that the business combination is first approved by our
board of directors (including a majority of directors who are
not affiliates or associates of such persons). In addition,
pursuant to a provision in our bylaws, we have opted out of the
control share provisions of the MGCL. However, our board of
directors may by resolution elect to opt in to the business
combination provisions of the MGCL and we may, by amendment to
our bylaws, opt in to the control share provisions of the MGCL
in the future.
Additionally, Title 8, Subtitle 3 of the MGCL permits our
board of directors, without stockholder approval and regardless
of what is currently provided in our charter or bylaws, to
implement certain provisions, such as a classified board, some
of which we do not yet have. These provisions may have the
effect of inhibiting a third party from making an acquisition
proposal for us or of delaying, deferring or preventing a change
in control of us under the circumstances that otherwise could
provide our common stockholders with the opportunity to realize
a premium over the then current market price.
Our rights and
the rights of our stockholders to take action against our
directors and officers are limited, which could limit your
recourse in the event of actions not in your best
interests.
Under Maryland law, generally, a director will not be liable if
he or she performs his or her duties in good faith, in a manner
he or she reasonably believes to be in our best interests and
with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like
position would use under similar circumstances. In addition, our
charter limits the liability of our directors and officers to us
and our stockholders for money damages, except for liability
resulting from:
|
|
Ø
|
actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money,
property or services; or
|
|
Ø
|
active and deliberate dishonesty by the director or officer that
was established by a final judgment as being material to the
cause of action adjudicated.
|
Our charter authorizes us to indemnify our directors and
officers for actions taken by them in those capacities to the
maximum extent permitted by Maryland law. Our bylaws require us
to indemnify each director or officer, to the maximum extent
permitted by Maryland law, in the defense of any proceeding to
which he or she is made, or threatened to be made, a party by
reason of his or her service to us. In addition, we may be
obligated to advance the defense costs incurred by our directors
and officers. As a result, we and our stockholders may have more
limited rights against our directors and officers than might
otherwise exist absent the current provisions in our charter and
bylaws or that might exist with other companies.
39
Risk
factors
Our charter
contains provisions that make removal of our directors
difficult, which could make it difficult for our stockholders to
effect changes to our management.
Our charter provides that a director may be removed only for
cause (as defined in our charter) and then only by the
affirmative vote of holders of shares entitled to cast at least
two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast generally in the
election of directors. Our charter also provides that vacancies
on our board of directors may be filled only by a majority of
the remaining directors in office, even if less than a quorum.
These requirements prevent stockholders from removing directors
except for cause and with a substantial affirmative vote and
from replacing directors with their own nominees and may prevent
a change in control of our company that is in the best interests
of our stockholders.
The ability of
our board of directors to change our major policies without the
consent of stockholders may not be in your interest.
Our board of directors determines our major policies, including
policies and guidelines relating to our acquisitions, leverage,
financing, growth, operations and distributions to stockholders.
Our board may amend or revise these and other policies and
guidelines from time to time without the vote or consent of our
stockholders. Accordingly, our stockholders will have limited
control over changes in our policies and those changes could
adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations,
the market price of our common stock and our ability to make
distributions to our stockholders.
We will enter
into an employment agreement with each of our executive officers
that will require us to make payments in the event the
officers employment is terminated by us without cause, by
the officer for good reason or if we do not renew the
agreements.
The agreements that we will enter into with our executive
officers upon completion of this offering and the concurrent
private placement provide benefits under certain circumstances
that could make it more difficult for us to terminate these
executive officers and may prevent or deter a change in control
of our company that would otherwise be in the interest of our
stockholders.
If we fail to
implement and maintain an effective system of internal controls,
we may not be able to accurately determine our financial results
or prevent fraud. As a result, our stockholders could lose
confidence in our financial results, which could harm our
business and the value of our common stock.
Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide
reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud. We are
a newly formed company that will develop financial and
operational reporting and control systems. We may in the future
discover areas of our internal controls that need improvement.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 will require
us to evaluate and report on our internal controls over
financial reporting and have our independent auditors annually
issue their own opinion on our internal controls over financial
reporting. While we intend to undertake substantial work to
prepare for compliance with Section 404, we cannot be
certain that we will be successful in implementing or
maintaining adequate internal controls over our financial
reporting and financial processes. Furthermore, as we grow our
business, our internal controls will become more complex, and we
will require significantly more resources to ensure our internal
controls remain effective. If we or our independent auditors
discover a material weakness in our internal controls, the
disclosure of that fact, even if quickly remedied, could reduce
the market value of our common stock. Additionally, the
existence of any material weakness or significant deficiency in
respect of our internal controls would require management to
devote significant time and incur significant expense to
remediate any such material weaknesses or significant
deficiencies and management may not be able to remediate any
such material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in a timely
manner.
40
Risk
factors
RISKS RELATED TO
WARRANTS
There is no
assurance that purchasers of common stock in this offering will
receive warrants, and, upon issuance of the warrants, if any are
issued, the exercise price of the warrants could exceed the
current market trading price of our common stock.
Our obligation to issue warrants to purchasers of our common
stock in this offering is subject to various conditions,
including (i) the 30-day VWAP of our common stock must be below
the initial public offering price, (ii) the warrants must be
approved for listing, subject to official notice of issuance, on
the NYSE or the NYSE Amex, (iii) warrants will be issuable only
to purchasers of our common stock in this offering and then only
in respect of initial public offering shares that such initial
purchasers hold for the full 30-day period following this
offering and (iv) purchasers who are eligible to receive
warrants based on satisfaction of the foregoing conditions must
complete, sign and return to us a contingent warrant issuance
form in which such purchasers, among other things, represent and
warrant as to the number of shares of common stock that they
purchased in this offering, the number of shares that they have
held for the full 30-day period following this offering and that
they have not, directly or indirectly, sold, offered, contracted
or granted any option to sell (including without limitation any
short sale), pledged, transferred, established an open put
equivalent position on, or otherwise disposed of, or publicly
announced an intention to do any of the foregoing, with respect
to any of the shares held for the full 30-day period. It is
possible that purchasers of our common stock in this offering
will not receive any warrants if any of the foregoing conditions
is not satisfied. Upon issuance of the warrants, if any are
issued, the exercise price of the warrants could exceed the
current market trading price of our common stock.
If warrants are
issued to purchasers of our common stock in this offering, the
dilutive effect of the warrants could have an adverse effect on
the future market price of our common stock.
If we issue warrants to purchasers of our common stock in this
offering, the warrants will have an exercise price equal to the
initial public offering price of our common stock (subject to
adjustment in certain circumstances) and will be exercisable for
five years after the date of the warrants issuance, or
earlier upon redemption by us. The exercise of the warrants in
the future, if we elect to issue shares of common stock rather
than paying cash, would be dilutive to holders of our common
stock if our book value per share or the market price of our
common stock is higher than the exercise price at the time of
exercise. The potential for dilution from the warrants could
have an adverse effect on the future market price of our common
stock.
Holders of our
warrants will have no rights as common stockholders until they
exercise their warrants and acquire our common stock.
Until you acquire shares of our common stock upon the exercise
of the warrants, you will have no rights with respect to the
shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants,
including rights to vote or to receive distributions in respect
of such shares. Upon the exercise of the warrants, if we elect
to issue shares of common stock rather than paying cash, you
will have rights as a common stockholder with respect to the
shares issued upon exercise only as to matters for which the
record date occurs after the exercise date. Further, we may
elect to pay cash instead of issuing common stock and, as a
result, you may not acquire any shares of common stock upon
exercise of the warrants.
We cannot assure
you that a public market for our warrants will develop and your
ability to sell our warrants may be limited.
Currently, there is not a public market for our warrants. We
intend to apply to have our warrants listed on the NYSE or the
NYSE Amex. However, we cannot assure you that the warrants will
be approved
41
Risk
factors
for listing on the NYSE or the NYSE Amex, and, if we issue the
warrants, we cannot assure you that a regular trading market for
our warrants will develop or, if one does develop, that any such
market will be sustained. In the absence of a public trading
market, an investor may be unable to liquidate an investment in
our warrants.
An effective
registration statement may not be in place when an investor
desires to exercise warrants, thus precluding such investor from
being able to exercise his, her or its warrants and causing such
warrants to be practically worthless.
If we issue the warrants, no warrant will be exercisable and we
will not be obligated to issue shares of common stock unless at
the time such holder seeks to exercise such warrant, a
registration statement relating to the common stock issuable
upon exercise of the warrant is effective and a current
prospectus relating to such shares is available. Under the terms
of the warrant agreement, we have agreed to use our best efforts
to meet these conditions and to maintain a current prospectus
relating to the common stock issuable upon exercise of the
warrants until the expiration of the warrants. However, we
cannot assure you that we will be able to do so, and if we do
not maintain an effective registration statement or a current
prospectus related to the common stock issuable upon exercise of
the warrants, holders will be unable to exercise their warrants
and we will not be required to settle any such warrant exercise.
If the registration statement or the prospectus relating to the
common stock issuable upon the exercise of the warrants is not
effective or current, as applicable, the warrants may have no
value, the market for such warrants may be limited and such
warrants may expire worthless.
An investor will
only be able to exercise a warrant if the issuance of common
stock upon such exercise has been registered or qualified or is
deemed exempt under the securities laws of the state of
residence of the holder of the warrants.
If we issue the warrants, no warrants will be exercisable and we
will not be obligated to issue shares of common stock unless the
common stock issuable upon such exercise has been registered or
qualified or deemed to be exempt under the securities laws of
the state of residence of the holder of the warrants. If we
issue the warrants, we expect they will be listed on the NYSE or
the NYSE Amex, which would provide an exemption from
registration in every state. Accordingly, we believe holders in
every state will be able to exercise their warrants as long as
our registration statement and prospectus relating to the common
stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants are effective and
current. However, we cannot assure you of this fact. As a
result, the warrants may be deprived of any value, the market
for the warrants may be limited and the holders of warrants may
not be able to exercise their warrants if the common stock
issuable upon such exercise is not qualified or exempt from
qualification in the jurisdictions in which the holders of the
warrants reside.
The exercise
price of and the number of shares of common stock underlying the
warrants may not be adjusted for all dilutive events.
The exercise price of and the number of shares of common stock
underlying the warrants will be subject to adjustment for
certain events, including in the event of a stock dividend, or
recapitalization, reorganization, merger or consolidation of our
company. The exercise price will not be adjusted, however, for
issuances of our common stock for cash or in connection with an
acquisition by us. Additionally, the exercise price of, and the
number of shares of common stock underlying, the warrants will
not be adjusted for any cash distributions.
42
Risk
factors
You will
recognize gain or loss for federal income tax purposes if we
elect to pay cash upon the exercise of a warrant.
Upon the valid exercise of a warrant, we have a right to elect
to issue shares of our common stock or pay cash in an amount
equal to the fair market value of the shares of common stock
that are issuable as a result of the exercise. If we elect to
issue shares of common stock upon the exercise of a warrant, you
will generally not recognize gain or loss for federal income tax
purposes. However, if we elect to pay cash upon the exercise of
a warrant, you will recognize gain or loss for federal income
tax purposes equal to the difference between (1) the excess of
the cash received over the exercise price of the warrant and (2)
your tax basis, if any, in the warrant.
Your ability to
exercise your warrants may be limited by the ownership limits
contained in our charter.
If we issue the warrants, your ability to exercise your warrants
may be limited by the ownership limits contained in our charter.
In particular, to assist us in qualifying as a REIT, ownership
of shares of our common stock by any person is limited under the
charter, with certain exceptions, to 9.8% in value or in number
of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding
shares of any class or series of our capital stock. Moreover,
the terms of the warrants limit a holders ability to
exercise warrants to ensure that such holders
beneficial ownership or constructive
ownership as defined in our charter does not exceed the
restrictions contained in the charter limiting the ownership of
shares of our common stock, assuming we elect to issue shares of
common stock rather than paying cash upon exercise of the
warrants. In addition, our charter contains various other
restrictions limiting the ownership and transfer of our common
stock. As a result, you may not be able to exercise your
warrants if such exercise would cause you to own shares of our
common stock in excess of these ownership limits. In particular,
the terms of the warrants provide that we may call the warrants
for redemption at a price of $0.01 per warrant upon not
less than 30 days prior written notice of redemption
under certain circumstances. Warrants may be exercised prior to
the scheduled redemption date, subject to the ownership limits
contained in our charter. As a result, in the event we call the
warrants for redemption, these ownership limits may limit your
ability to exercise some or all of your warrants prior to the
redemption date.
RISKS RELATED TO
THIS OFFERING
We have not
established a minimum distribution payment level and we may be
unable to generate sufficient cash flows from our operations to
make distributions to our stockholders at any time in the
future.
We have not established a minimum distribution payment level,
and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders may be
adversely affected by the risk factors described in this
prospectus. Because we will commence operations only upon
completion of this offering and the concurrent private
placement, we may not generate sufficient income to make
distributions to our stockholders and cannot predict when
distributions consisting, in part, of cash flow from the senior
housing facilities we expect to acquire will commence. To the
extent we use the net proceeds from this offering or the
concurrent private placement to make distributions to our
stockholders, the amount of cash we have available to invest in
senior housing facilities or for other purposes would be reduced.
Our board of
directors has the sole discretion to determine the timing, form
and amount of any distributions to our stockholders and there
can be no assurance as to the determinations our board of
directors will make in respect of any of our future
dividends.
Our board of directors has the sole discretion to determine the
timing, form and amount of any distributions to our
stockholders, subject to applicable law. The amount of such
distributions may be
43
Risk
factors
limited until we have a portfolio of income-generating senior
housing facilities. Our board of directors will make
determinations regarding distributions based upon, among other
factors, our financial performance, any debt service
obligations, any debt covenants, and capital expenditure
requirements. Among the factors that could impair our ability to
make distributions to our stockholders are:
|
|
Ø
|
our inability to invest the net proceeds of this offering and
the concurrent private placement;
|
|
Ø
|
our inability to realize attractive returns on our investments;
|
|
Ø
|
unanticipated expenses or reduced revenues that reduce our cash
flow or non-cash earnings; and
|
|
Ø
|
decreases in the value of our facilities.
|
As a result, no assurance can be given that we will be able to
make distributions to our stockholders at any time in the future
or that the level of any distributions we do make to our
stockholders will increase or even be maintained over time, any
of which could materially and adversely affect the market price
of our common stock.
A portion of our
distributions may constitute a return of capital, which would
have the effect of reducing the basis of a stockholders
investment in our common stock.
Distributions that we make to our stockholders generally will be
taxable to our stockholders as ordinary income. However, a
portion of our distributions may be designated by us as
long-term capital gains to the extent that they are attributable
to capital gain income recognized by us or may constitute a
return of capital to the extent that they exceed our accumulated
earnings and profits as determined for tax purposes. A return of
capital is not taxable, but has the effect of reducing the basis
of a stockholders investment in our common stock.
We cannot assure
you that a public market for our common stock will develop and
your ability to sell our common stock may be limited.
Prior to this offering, there has not been a public market for
our common stock. Our common stock has been approved for listing
on the NYSE. However, we cannot assure you that a regular
trading market for our common stock will develop or, if one does
develop, that any such market will be sustained. In the absence
of a public trading market, an investor may be unable to
liquidate an investment in our common stock. The initial public
offering price will be determined by us and the representatives
of the underwriters. We cannot assure you that the price at
which the common stock will sell in the public market after the
closing of this offering will not be lower than the price at
which they are sold by the underwriters.
Common stock
eligible for future sale may adversely affect the prevailing
market prices for our common stock.
We cannot predict the effect, if any, of future sales of common
stock, or the availability of common stock for future sale, on
the market price of our common stock. Sales of substantial
amounts of common stock (including shares issued to our
directors and officers), or the perception that these sales
could occur, may adversely affect prevailing market prices for
our common stock.
Each of our directors and officers who has received share grants
has entered into a
lock-up
agreement with respect to his or her common stock, restricting
the sale of such persons shares, for 180 days after
the date of this prospectus. Jefferies & Company, Inc.
may, in its sole discretion and at any time or from time to time
before the termination of the
180-day
period, without public notice, release all or any portion of the
securities subject to
lock-up
agreements. If the restrictions under such agreements are
waived, the affected common stock may be available for sale into
the market, which could reduce the market price for our common
stock.
44
Risk
factors
We also may issue from time to time additional common stock or
limited partnership interests in our operating partnership in
connection with the acquisition of properties and we may grant
demand or piggyback registration rights in connection with these
issuances. Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock or
the perception that these sales could occur may adversely affect
the prevailing market price for our common stock or may impair
our ability to raise capital through a sale of additional equity
securities.
The market price
of our common stock may be volatile due to numerous
circumstances beyond our control.
The trading prices of equity securities issued by REITs
historically have been affected by changes in market interest
rates. One of the factors that may influence the price of our
common stock is the annual yield from distributions on our
common stock as compared to yields on other financial
instruments. An increase in market interest rates, or a decrease
in our distributions to stockholders, may lead prospective
purchasers of our common stock to demand a higher annual yield,
which could reduce the market price of our common stock.
Other factors that could affect the market price of our common
stock include the following:
|
|
Ø
|
actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly results of
operations;
|
|
Ø
|
changes in market valuations of companies in the health care,
senior housing or real estate industries;
|
|
Ø
|
changes in expectations of future financial performance or
changes in estimates of securities analysts;
|
|
Ø
|
fluctuations in stock market prices and volumes;
|
|
Ø
|
our issuances of common stock or other securities in the future,
including the warrants we may issue in connection with this
offering and any shares of common stock we issue upon exercise
of such warrants;
|
|
Ø
|
the addition or departure of key personnel; and
|
|
Ø
|
announcements by us or our competitors of acquisitions,
investments or strategic alliances.
|
Future offerings
of debt or equity securities ranking senior to our common stock
may limit our operating and financial flexibility and may
adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
If we decide to issue debt or equity securities in the future
ranking senior to our common stock or otherwise incur
indebtedness, it is possible that these securities or
indebtedness will be governed by an indenture or other
instrument containing covenants restricting our operating
flexibility and limiting our ability to make distributions to
our stockholders. Additionally, any convertible or exchangeable
securities that we issue in the future may have rights,
preferences and privileges, including with respect to
distributions, more favorable than those of our common stock and
may result in dilution to owners of our common stock. Because
our decision to issue debt or equity securities in any future
offering or otherwise incur indebtedness will depend on market
conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot
predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of our future
offerings or financings, any of which could reduce the market
price of our common stock and dilute the value of our common
stock.
45
Risk
factors
FEDERAL INCOME
TAX RISK FACTORS
Our failure to
qualify, or our failure to remain qualified, as a REIT would
result in higher taxes and reduced cash available for
distribution to our stockholders.
We intend to elect to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax
purposes, commencing with our short taxable year beginning on
the business day prior to the closing of this offering and
ending December 31, 2010. However, qualification as a REIT
involves the application of highly technical and complex
provisions of the Code, for which only a limited number of
judicial and administrative interpretations exist. Even an
inadvertent or technical mistake could jeopardize our REIT
qualification. Our qualification as a REIT will depend on our
satisfaction of certain asset, income, organizational,
distribution, stockholder ownership and other requirements on a
continuing basis.
Moreover, new tax legislation, administrative guidance or court
decisions, in each instance potentially applicable with
retroactive effect, could make it more difficult or impossible
for us to qualify as a REIT. If we were to fail to qualify as a
REIT in any taxable year, we would be subject to federal income
tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on our
taxable income at regular corporate rates, and distributions to
stockholders would not be deductible by us in computing our
taxable income. Any such corporate tax liability could be
substantial and would reduce the amount of cash available for
distribution to our stockholders, which in turn could have an
adverse impact on the value of our shares. If, for any reason,
we failed to qualify as a REIT and we were not entitled to
relief under certain Code provisions, we would be unable to
elect REIT status for the four taxable years following the year
during which we ceased to so qualify which would negatively
impact the value of our common stock.
Failure to make
required distributions would subject us to tax, which would
reduce the cash available for distribution to our
stockholders.
To qualify as a REIT, we must distribute to our stockholders
each calendar year at least 90% of our REIT taxable income
(including certain items of non-cash income), determined before
the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital
gain. To the extent that we satisfy the 90% distribution
requirement, but distribute less than 100% of our taxable
income, we will be subject to federal corporate income tax on
our undistributed income. In addition, we will incur a 4%
nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which our
distributions in any calendar year are less than the sum of:
|
|
Ø
|
85% of our REIT ordinary income for that year;
|
|
Ø
|
95% of our REIT capital gain net income for that year; and
|
|
Ø
|
any undistributed taxable income from prior years.
|
We intend to distribute our taxable income to our stockholders
in a manner intended to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement
and to avoid both corporate income tax and the 4% nondeductible
excise tax. However, there is no requirement that TRSs
distribute their after-tax net income to their parent REIT or
their stockholders.
Our taxable income may substantially exceed our net income as
determined based on United States generally accepted accounting
principles, or GAAP, because, for example, realized capital
losses will be deducted in determining our GAAP net income, but
may not be deductible in computing our taxable income.
Differences in timing between the recognition of income and the
related cash receipts or the effect of required debt
amortization payments could require us to borrow money or sell
properties at prices or at times that we regard as unfavorable
in order to pay out enough of our taxable income to satisfy the
distribution requirement and to avoid corporate income tax and
the 4% nondeductible excise tax in a particular year.
46
Risk
factors
Complying with
REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive
business opportunities or liquidate otherwise attractive
investments.
To qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we must
continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the
sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our
assets, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders and the
ownership of our shares. In order to meet these tests, we may be
required to forego investments we might otherwise make. Thus,
compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our performance.
In particular, we must ensure that at the end of each calendar
quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of
cash, cash items, government securities and qualified real
estate assets. The remainder of our investment in securities
(other than government securities and qualified real estate
assets) generally cannot include more than 10% of the
outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10%
of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one
issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of
our assets (other than government securities and qualified real
estate assets) can consist of the securities of any one issuer,
and no more than 25% of the value of our total assets can be
represented by the securities of one or more TRSs. If we fail to
comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar
quarter, we must correct the failure within 30 days after
the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory
relief provisions to avoid losing our REIT qualification and
suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, we may be
required to liquidate otherwise attractive investments. These
actions could have the effect of reducing our income and amounts
available for distribution to our stockholders.
The formation of
our TRS lessee increases our overall tax liability.
Our TRS lessee will be subject to federal and state income tax
on its taxable income, which will consist of the revenues from
the senior housing facilities leased by the TRS lessee, net of
the operating expenses for such properties and rent payments to
us. Accordingly, although our ownership of our TRS lessee will
allow us to participate in the operating income from our
properties leased to our TRS lessee on an after tax basis in
addition to receiving rent, that operating income will be fully
subject to federal and state income tax. The after-tax net
income of the TRS lessee is available for distribution to us.
Our ownership of
our TRSs will be limited and our transactions with our TRSs will
cause us to be subject to a 100% penalty tax on certain income
or deductions if those transactions are not conducted on
arms-length terms.
A REIT may own up to 100% of the stock of one or more TRSs. A
TRS may hold assets and earn income that would not be qualifying
assets or income if held or earned directly by a REIT, including
gross operating income from operations pursuant to management
contracts. A subsidiary that intends to be treated as a TRS of a
REIT and the REIT must jointly elect to treat the subsidiary as
a TRS. A corporation of which a TRS directly or indirectly owns
more than 35% of the voting power or value of the securities
will automatically be treated as a TRS. Overall, no more than
25% of the value of a REITs assets may consist of stock or
securities of one or more TRSs. In addition, the TRS rules limit
the deductibility of interest paid or accrued by a TRS to its
parent REIT to assure that the TRS is subject to an appropriate
level of corporate taxation. The rules also impose a 100% excise
tax on certain transactions between a TRS and its parent REIT
that are not conducted on an arms-length basis.
Our TRSs will pay applicable federal, foreign, state and local
income tax on its taxable income, and its after-tax net income
will be available for distribution to us but is not required to
be distributed by our TRSs to us. We anticipate that the
aggregate value of the securities of our TRSs will be less than
25% of the value of our total assets (including our TRSs
securities). Furthermore, we will monitor the value of our
respective investments in our TRSs for the purpose of ensuring
compliance with TRS ownership
47
Risk
factors
limitations. In addition, we will scrutinize all of our
transactions with our TRSs to ensure that they are entered into
on arms-length terms to avoid incurring the 100% excise
tax described above. There can be no assurance, however, that we
will be able to comply with the 25% limitation discussed above
or to avoid application of the 100% excise tax discussed above.
If the leases of
our senior housing facilities are not respected as true leases
for federal income tax purposes, we would fail to qualify as a
REIT and would be subject to higher taxes and have less cash
available for distribution to our stockholders.
To qualify as a REIT, we must satisfy two gross income tests,
under which specified percentages of our gross income must be
derived from certain sources, such as rents from real
property. Rents paid to our operating partnership by our
TRS lessee and third-party lessees pursuant to the leases of our
senior housing facilities will constitute substantially all of
our gross income. In order for such rent to qualify as
rents from real property for purposes of the gross
income tests, the leases must be respected as true leases for
federal income tax purposes and not be treated as service
contracts, joint ventures or some other type of arrangement. If
our leases are not respected as true leases for federal income
tax purposes, we would fail to qualify as a REIT.
If our TRS lessee
failed to qualify as a TRS or the facility operators engaged by
our TRS lessee do not qualify as eligible independent
contractors, we would fail to qualify as a REIT and would
be subject to higher taxes and have less cash available for
distribution to our stockholders.
Rent paid by a lessee that is a related party tenant
of ours will not be qualifying income for purposes of the two
gross income tests applicable to REITs. We expect to lease
certain of our senior housing facilities to our TRS lessee. So
long as our TRS lessee qualifies as a TRS, it will not be
treated as a related party tenant with respect to
our properties that are managed by an independent facility
operator that qualifies as an eligible independent
contractor. We believe that our TRS lessee will qualify to
be treated as TRSs for federal income tax purposes, but there
can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge the status
of a TRS for federal income tax purposes or that a court would
not sustain such a challenge. If the IRS were successful in
disqualifying our TRS lessee from treatment as a TRS, it is
possible that we would fail to meet the asset tests applicable
to REITs and a significant portion of our income would fail to
qualify for the gross income tests. If we failed to meet either
the asset or gross income tests, we would likely lose our REIT
qualification for federal income tax purposes.
Additionally, if the facility operators engaged by our TRS
lessee do not qualify as eligible independent
contractors, we would fail to qualify as a REIT. Each of
the facility operators that enter into a management contract
with our TRS lessee must qualify as an eligible
independent contractor under the REIT rules in order for
the rent paid to us by our TRS lessee to be qualifying income
for purposes of the REIT gross income tests. Among other
requirements, in order to qualify as an eligible independent
contractor a facility operator must not own, directly or
indirectly, more than 35% of our outstanding shares and no
person or group of persons can own more than 35% of our
outstanding shares and the ownership interests of the facility
operator, taking into account certain ownership attribution
rules. The ownership attribution rules that apply for purposes
of these 35% thresholds are complex. Although we intend to
monitor ownership of our shares by our facility operators and
their owners, there can be no assurance that these ownership
levels will not be exceeded.
48
Risk
factors
Our ability to
lease certain of the senior housing facilities we acquire from
operators to our TRS lessee will be limited by the ability of
those senior housing facilities to qualify as qualified
health care properties and the ability of those operators
to qualify as eligible independent
contractors.
We intend to lease certain of the senior housing facilities we
acquire from operators and that constitute qualified
health care properties to our TRS lessee and to cause our
TRS lessee to contract with those operators to manage the health
care operations at those facilities. Our ability to utilize this
TRS lessee structure may be limited by the ability of those
senior housing facilities to qualify as qualified health
care properties and the ability of the operators from whom
we acquire qualified health care properties to
qualify as eligible independent contractors.
A qualified health care property includes any real
property and any personal property that is, or is necessary or
incidental to the use of, a hospital, nursing facility, assisted
living facility, congregate care facility, qualified continuing
care facility, or other licensed facility which extends medical
or nursing or ancillary services to patients and which is
operated by a provider of such services which is eligible for
participation in the Medicare program with respect to such
facility. We expect that some of the properties that we will
acquire will not be treated as qualified health care
properties. To the extent a property does not constitute a
qualified health care property, we will be unable to
utilize the TRS lessee structure with respect to that property,
and instead may lease the property back to the operator pursuant
to a net lease. One of the initial properties we have under
contract contains solely assisting living units, and
consequently, will constitute a qualified health care
property. With respect to the remaining five initial
properties, four are senior housing facilities containing both
independent and assisted living units housed in the same
building and one is a senior housing facility containing both
independent living and assisted living units housed on the same
campus, in each case with a majority of the units constituting
independent living units. Under current law, it is unclear
whether such facilities will constitute qualified health
care properties. Consequently, we intend to initially
lease our initial properties to affiliates of Senior Lifestyle
Management, the management company that currently operates those
properties, and to request a private letter ruling from the IRS
(i) confirming that our initial properties constitute
qualified health care properties and (ii) with
respect to our initial properties located in the State of New
York, that certain powers our TRS lessee will be required to
retain under healthcare regulations issued by the State of New
York will not cause our TRS lessee to be considered to operate
or manage a health care facility. If we do not receive a private
letter ruling that confirms our ability to lease the six
facilities that we currently have under contract to our TRS
lessee and the regulatory approvals required to transfer the
operating licenses for these facilities to our TRS lessee, we
will either lease the facilities to affiliates of Senior
Lifestyle Management under a long-term net lease that provides
for the payment of base rent subject to annual escalators as
well as percentage rent based on gross revenue or we could lease
the units at the facilities directly to the residents and
provide services to these residents through a TRS.
In order to qualify as an eligible independent
contractor, among other requirements, an operator (or any
related person) must be actively engaged in the trade or
business of operating qualified health care
properties for persons who are not related to us or our
TRS lessee. Consequently, if an operator (or a related person)
from whom we acquire a qualified health care
property does not operate sufficient qualified
health care properties for third parties, the operator
will not qualify as an eligible independent
contractor. Under this scenario, we would either be
required to contract with another third party operator who
qualifies as an eligible independent contractor,
which could serve as a disincentive for the current operator to
sell the property to us, or we would be unable to lease the
property to our TRS lessee and instead would likely lease the
property back to the operator pursuant to a long-term net lease.
49
Risk
factors
Dividends payable
by REITs do not qualify for the reduced tax rates available for
some dividends.
The maximum tax rate applicable to income from qualified
dividends payable to U.S. stockholders that are
individuals, trusts and estates has been reduced by legislation
to 15% (through the end of 2010). Dividends payable by REITs,
however, generally are not eligible for the reduced rates.
Although this legislation does not adversely affect the taxation
of REITs or dividends payable by REITs, the more favorable rates
applicable to regular corporate qualified dividends could cause
investors who are individuals, trusts and estates to perceive
investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than
investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay
dividends, which could adversely affect the value of the shares
of REITs, including our common stock.
Under recently
issued IRS guidance, we may pay taxable dividends of our common
stock and cash, in which case stockholders may sell shares of
our common stock to pay tax on such dividends, placing downward
pressure on the market price of our common stock.
Under recently issued IRS guidance, we may distribute taxable
dividends that are payable in cash and common stock at the
election of each stockholder. Under Revenue Procedure
2010-12,
up
to 90% of any such taxable dividend paid with respect to our
2010 and 2011 taxable years could be payable in shares of our
common stock. Taxable stockholders receiving such dividends will
be required to include the full amount of the dividend as
ordinary income to the extent of our current and accumulated
earnings and profits, as determined for federal income tax
purposes. As a result, stockholders may be required to pay
income tax with respect to such dividends in excess of the cash
dividends received. If a U.S. stockholder sells the common
stock that it receives as a dividend in order to pay this tax,
the sales proceeds may be less than the amount included in
income with respect to the dividend, depending on the market
price of our common stock at the time of the sale. Furthermore,
with respect to certain
non-U.S. stockholders,
we may be required to withhold federal income tax with respect
to such dividends, including in respect of all or a portion of
such dividend that is payable in common stock. If we utilize
Revenue Procedure
2010-12
and
a significant number of our stockholders determine to sell
shares of our common stock in order to pay taxes owed on
dividends, it may put downward pressure on the trading price of
our common stock. We do not currently intend to utilize Revenue
Procedure
2010-12.
The prohibited
transactions tax may limit our ability to engage in
transactions, including dispositions of assets, that would be
treated as sales for federal income tax purposes.
A REITs net income from prohibited transactions is subject
to a 100% tax. In general, prohibited transactions are sales or
other dispositions of property, other than foreclosure property,
held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of
business. We may be subject to the prohibited transaction tax
upon a disposition of real property. Although a safe harbor to
the characterization of the sale of real property by a REIT as a
prohibited transaction is available, we cannot assure you that
we can comply with the safe harbor or that we will avoid owning
property that may be characterized as held primarily for sale to
customers in the ordinary course of business. Consequently, we
may choose not to engage in certain sales of real property or
may conduct such sales through a TRS.
The ability of
our board of directors to revoke our REIT qualification without
stockholder approval may subject us to federal income tax and
reduce distributions to our stockholders.
Our charter provides that our board of directors may revoke or
otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of
our stockholders, if it determines that it is no longer in our
best interest to continue to qualify as a REIT. If we cease to
be a REIT, we would become subject to federal income tax on our
taxable income and would no longer be required to distribute
most of our taxable income to our
50
Risk
factors
stockholders, which may have adverse consequences on our total
return to our stockholders and on the market price of our common
stock.
We may be subject
to adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes that could
reduce the market price of our common stock.
At any time, the federal income tax laws governing REITs or the
administrative interpretations of those laws may be amended. We
cannot predict when or if any new federal income tax law,
regulation, or administrative interpretation, or any amendment
to any existing federal income tax law, regulation or
administrative interpretation, will be adopted, promulgated or
become effective and any such law, regulation, or interpretation
may take effect retroactively. We and our stockholders could be
adversely affected by any such change in, or any new, federal
income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation.
The stock
ownership restrictions of the Code for REITs and the 9.8% stock
ownership limit in our charter may inhibit market activity in
our capital stock and restrict our business combination
opportunities.
In order to qualify as a REIT for each taxable year after 2010,
five or fewer individuals, as defined in the Code, may not own,
actually or constructively, more than 50% in value of our issued
and outstanding stock at any time during the last half of a
taxable year. Attribution rules in the Code determine if any
individual or entity actually or constructively owns our capital
stock under this requirement. Additionally, at least
100 persons must beneficially own our capital stock during
at least 335 days of a taxable year for each taxable year
after 2010. To help insure that we meet these tests, our charter
restricts the acquisition and ownership of shares of our capital
stock.
Our charter, with certain exceptions, authorizes our directors
to take such actions as are necessary and desirable to preserve
our qualification as a REIT. Unless exempted by our board of
directors, our charter prohibits any person from beneficially or
constructively owning more than 9.8% in value or number of
shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares
of any class or series of our capital stock. Our board of
directors may not grant an exemption from these restrictions to
any proposed transferee whose ownership in excess of 9.8% of the
value of our outstanding shares would result in our failing to
qualify as a REIT. These restrictions on transferability and
ownership will not apply, however, if our board of directors
determines that it is no longer in our best interest to continue
to qualify as a REIT.
51
Cautionary
note regarding forward-looking statements
We make forward-looking statements in this prospectus that are
subject to risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking
statements include information about possible or assumed future
results of our business, financial condition, liquidity, results
of operations, plans and objectives. Statements regarding the
following subjects are forward-looking by their nature.
|
|
Ø
|
our business and investment strategy;
|
|
Ø
|
our expected operating results;
|
|
Ø
|
completion of acquisitions;
|
|
Ø
|
our ability to successfully implement proposed acquisition,
lease and management structures;
|
|
Ø
|
our ability to obtain a private letter ruling and regulatory
approvals which will allow us to implement the TRS lessee
structure for the senior housing facilities we have under
contract;
|
|
Ø
|
our ability to obtain future financing arrangements;
|
|
Ø
|
our expected leverage levels;
|
|
Ø
|
our understanding of our competition;
|
|
Ø
|
market and industry trends and expectations;
|
|
Ø
|
anticipated capital expenditures;
|
|
Ø
|
use of the net proceeds of this offering and the concurrent
private placement; and
|
|
Ø
|
the warrants we may issue in connection with this offering.
|
The forward-looking statements are based on our beliefs,
assumptions and expectations of our future performance, taking
into account all information currently available to us. These
beliefs, assumptions and expectations can change as a result of
many possible events or factors, not all of which are known to
us. If a change occurs, our business, prospects, financial
condition, liquidity and results of operations may vary
materially from those expressed in our forward-looking
statements. You should carefully consider this risk when you
make an investment decision concerning our common stock.
Additionally, the following factors could cause actual results
to vary from our forward-looking statements:
|
|
Ø
|
the factors discussed in this prospectus, including those set
forth in the Risk Factors, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and Business sections of this
prospectus;
|
|
Ø
|
general volatility of the capital markets and the market price
of our common stock;
|
|
Ø
|
performance of the senior housing, health care and real estate
industries in general;
|
|
Ø
|
legislative developments that impact the senior housing, and
health care and real estate industries;
|
|
Ø
|
changes in our business or investment strategy;
|
|
Ø
|
changes in market conditions within the senior housing industry
and in the availability of senior housing facilities for
acquisition;
|
|
Ø
|
our ability to satisfy closing conditions and obtain regulatory,
lender and other rulings, approvals and consents;
|
|
Ø
|
availability, terms and deployment of capital;
|
|
Ø
|
availability of and our ability to attract and retain qualified
personnel;
|
|
Ø
|
our leverage levels;
|
52
Cautionary
note regarding forward-looking statements
|
|
Ø
|
our capital expenditures;
|
|
Ø
|
our ability to satisfy the requirements for qualification and
taxation as a REIT for federal income tax purposes;
|
|
Ø
|
changes in our industry and the market in which we operate,
interest rates or the general U.S. or international
economy; and
|
|
Ø
|
the degree and nature of our competition.
|
When we use the words will, will likely
result, may, anticipate,
estimate, should, expect,
believe, intend or similar expressions,
we intend to identify forward-looking statements. You should not
place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We are
not obligated to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
53
Use of proceeds
We estimate that the net proceeds of this offering will be
approximately $151.2 million, assuming an initial public
offering price of $18.50 per share, the midpoint of the initial
public offering price range shown on the cover of this
prospectus, and after deducting the full underwriting discounts
and commissions and other estimated offering expenses payable by
us. If the underwriters overallotment option is exercised
in full, our net proceeds will be approximately
$174.2 million.
Concurrently with the completion of this offering, we will sell
an aggregate of 324,324 shares of common stock to certain
of our executive officers in a private placement at a price per
share equal to the public offering price per share in this
offering shown on the cover of this prospectus, without payment
of any placement fee by us, yielding an additional
$6.0 million of net proceeds to us.
We will contribute the net proceeds of this offering and the
concurrent private placement to our operating partnership. Our
operating partnership will use approximately $84.9 million
of the net proceeds to fund (i) the approximate
$81.9 million cash portion of the $240.0 million
contractual purchase price for the six senior housing facilities
that we currently have under contract and (ii) the payment
of approximately $3.0 million of closing costs related to
the acquisition. We will also assume approximately
$158.1 million of in-place mortgage debt that encumbers the
six facilities and $15.7 million of deposit liabilities
relating to deferred and refundable resident entrance fees
associated with the six facilities.
Our operating partnership will use the remaining net proceeds to
invest in additional senior housing facilities in accordance
with our investment strategy described in this prospectus, and
for general business purposes. If any of the warrants are issued
and subsequently exercised and we elect to issue shares of
common stock rather than paying cash upon such exercise, we will
contribute the proceeds to our operating partnership and our
operating partnership will use the proceeds for general
corporate purposes, including working capital. Prior to the full
investment of the remaining net proceeds in senior housing
facilities, we intend to invest the remaining net proceeds in
interest-bearing, short-term securities or money-market accounts
which are consistent with our intention to qualify as a REIT.
Such investments may include, for example, government and
government agency certificates, certificates of deposit,
interest-bearing bank deposits and mortgage loan participations.
These initial investments are expected to provide a lower net
return than we will seek to achieve from investments in senior
housing facilities.
Although we do not currently intend to use any of the net
proceeds from this offering or the concurrent private placement
to fund distributions to our stockholders, to the extent we use
net offering proceeds to fund distributions, these payments may
be treated as a return of capital to our stockholders and the
amount of cash we have available to invest in senior housing
facilities or for other purposes would be reduced.
We will use approximately $0.1 million of the proceeds of
this offering and the concurrent private placement to repurchase
the 1,000 shares of our common stock that were issued to
Mr. Hutchison when we were formed and to reimburse
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred by Mr. Hutchison and his affiliates in
connection with our formation, approximately $0.6 million
to reimburse offering expenses which Mr. Hutchison has
advanced on our behalf, and approximately $0.7 million to
reimburse costs incurred by Mr. Hutchison in connection
with the acquisition of our initial portfolio, primarily the
earnest money deposit that Mr. Hutchison advanced on our
behalf.
54
Capitalization
The following table sets forth:
|
|
Ø
|
our actual capitalization as of June 30, 2010;
|
|
|
Ø
|
our capitalization (in thousands), as adjusted on a pro forma
basis to give effect to (1) the sale of our common stock in
this offering and the concurrent private placement, at an
assumed initial public offering price of $18.50 per share,
which is the midpoint of the initial public offering price range
set forth on the cover of this prospectus, and, in the case of
the common stock sold in this offering, net of the underwriting
discounts and commissions and other expenses payable by us in
connection with this offering, (2) the acquisition of the
six senior housing facilities we have under contract and the
assumption of the mortgage debt encumbering those facilities,
(3) the repurchase of the 1,000 shares of common stock
currently held by Mr. Hutchison for $1,000 and (4) the
grant pursuant to our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan of the shares
of common stock described in the footnotes to the table.
|
This table should be read in conjunction with the section
captioned Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
(1)
|
|
|
Pro
forma
(1)(2)
|
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
2,245
|
|
|
$
|
72,257
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,075
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share, no shares
authorized, no shares issued and outstanding, actual;
100,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and
outstanding, as adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000 shares
authorized, 1,000 shares issued and outstanding, actual;
500,000,000 shares authorized, 9,099,324 shares issued
and outstanding, as
adjusted
(2)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
157,322
|
|
Retained earnings (deficit)
|
|
|
(476,915
|
)
|
|
|
(708
|
)
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
(475,915
|
)
|
|
|
156,704
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
(473,670
|
)
|
|
$
|
387,036
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The amounts shown in the actual column are in dollars,
whereas the amounts shown in the pro forma column are in
thousands of dollars.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes an aggregate of 25,000 shares of restricted
common stock that will be granted to our director nominees upon
completion of this offering. The pro forma amounts exclude:
(i) up to 1,312,500 shares of common stock issuable
upon exercise of the underwriters overallotment option,
(ii) any shares of common stock that may be issued upon the
exercise of warrants that may be issued in connection with this
offering, and (iii) the remaining shares reserved for
future issuance under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (in
addition to the stock grants that will be made upon completion
of this offering as described above).
|
55
Distribution policy
We intend to make regular quarterly distributions to our common
stockholders out of funds legally available therefor beginning
at such time as our board of directors determines that we have
acquired senior housing facilities generating sufficient cash
flow to do so. Until we invest a substantial portion of the net
proceeds of this offering and the concurrent private placement
in senior housing facilities, we expect our distributions will
be nominal. We cannot predict the timing of our senior housing
facility investments or when we will commence paying quarterly
distributions.
In order to qualify for taxation as a REIT, we intend to make
annual distributions to our stockholders of an amount at least
equal to:
|
|
Ø
|
90% of our REIT taxable income (determined before the deduction
for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gain); plus
|
|
Ø
|
90% of the excess of our after-tax net income, if any, from
foreclosure property over the tax imposed on such income by the
Code; less
|
|
Ø
|
the sum of certain items of non-cash income.
|
Generally, we expect to distribute 100% of our taxable income so
as to avoid the tax on undistributed REIT taxable income.
However, we cannot assure you as to when we will begin to
generate sufficient cash flow to make distributions to our
stockholders or our ability to sustain those distributions. See
the section entitled Material Federal Income Tax
Considerations below.
Distributions will be authorized by our board of directors and
declared by us based upon a variety of factors, including:
|
|
Ø
|
actual results of operations;
|
|
Ø
|
the timing of the investment of the net proceeds of this
offering;
|
|
Ø
|
any debt service requirements;
|
|
Ø
|
capital expenditure requirements for our properties;
|
|
Ø
|
our taxable income;
|
|
Ø
|
the annual distribution requirement under the REIT provisions of
the Code;
|
|
Ø
|
our operating expenses; and
|
|
Ø
|
other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.
|
Distributions to our stockholders generally will be taxable to
our stockholders as ordinary income; however, because a
significant portion of our investments will be ownership of
equity interests in senior housing facilities, which will
generate depreciation and other non-cash charges against our
income, a portion of our distributions may constitute a tax-free
return of capital. To the extent that, in respect of any
calendar year, cash available for distribution is less than our
net taxable income, we could be required to sell assets or
borrow funds to make cash distributions or make a portion of the
required distribution in the form of a taxable share
distribution or distribution of debt securities. In addition,
prior to the time we have fully invested the net proceeds of
this offering and our concurrent private placement, we may fund
our quarterly distributions out of such net proceeds, although
we do not currently expect to do so. The use of our net proceeds
for distributions could be dilutive to our financial results. In
addition, funding our distributions from our net proceeds may
constitute a return of capital to our investors, which would
have the effect of reducing each stockholders basis in its
common stock. Income as computed for purposes of the tax rules
described above will not necessarily correspond to our income as
determined for financial reporting purposes. To the extent
consistent with maintaining our qualification as a REIT, we may
retain earnings that accumulate in our TRS lessee or any other
TRS we may form.
56
Selected pro forma
financial information
The following selected pro forma condensed consolidated balance
sheet data as of June 30, 2010 has been prepared to reflect
adjustments to our historical consolidated balance sheet to
illustrate the estimated effect of the following transactions as
if they had occurred on June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
the initial public offering of 8,750,000 shares of our
common stock for an assumed initial public offering price of
$18.50 per share, which is the midpoint of the initial
public offering price shown on the cover of this prospectus, net
of the underwriting discounts and commissions, and the offering
of warrants to purchase up to an additional
8,750,000 shares of our common stock, which warrants would
be issued only to investors who purchase shares of common stock
in this offering if certain events occur and certain conditions
are satisfied;
|
|
|
|
|
(ii)
|
the concurrent private placement of 324,324 shares of our
common stock to certain of our executive officers for an assumed
purchase price of $18.50 per share, without payment of any
placement fee;
|
|
|
|
|
(iii)
|
the acquisition, following the closing of this offering and the
concurrent private placement, of the six senior housing
facilities we have under contract for approximately
$81.9 million in cash, funded from the net proceeds of this
offering and the concurrent private placement, the assumption of
approximately $158.1 million of long-term indebtedness, the
payment of approximately $3.0 million of closing costs and
the assumption of approximately $15.7 million of deposit
liabilities relating to deferred and refundable resident
entrance fees associated with the six facilities; and
|
|
|
|
|
(iv)
|
the grant pursuant to our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan of an
aggregate of 25,000 shares of restricted common stock to
our director nominees upon completion of this offering and the
concurrent private placement.
|
The following selected pro forma condensed consolidated
operating data for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and
the year ended December 31, 2009 has been prepared to
illustrate the estimated effect of the transactions described in
items (i) through (iv) above, assuming such
transactions were completed on January 1, 2009 and also
includes our anticipated operating costs and estimated payments
under the proposed leases with affiliates of Senior Lifestyle
Management for Lake Barrington Woods, Bella Terra,
BaywindeCastle Pointe, Chancellors Village and
Mangrove Bay and the existing leases with affiliates of Senior
Lifestyle Management for the New York assisted living
facilities. The selected pro forma financial information and
other data does not reflect the impact of the TRS lessee
structure.
The following selected pro forma financial and other data should
be read in conjunction with (i) our historical audited
consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto
appearing elsewhere in this prospectus, (ii) our unaudited
pro forma financial statements and the notes thereto appearing
elsewhere in this prospectus, (iii) the historical audited
and unaudited consolidated financial statements of WSL IV
and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this prospectus,
(iv) the historical audited and unaudited financial
statements of SL Jupiter and the notes thereto appearing
elsewhere in this prospectus, and (v) the Risk
Factors, Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements, and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
sections in this prospectus. We have based our unaudited pro
forma adjustments on available information and assumptions that
we believe are reasonable. The following selected pro forma
financial and other data are presented for informational
purposes only and do not purport to be indicative of our results
of operations or financial condition even if the various events
and transactions reflected therein had occurred on the dates, or
been in effect during the periods indicated. The following
selected pro forma
57
Selected pro
forma financial information
financial and other data are presented for informational
purposes only and should not be viewed as indicative of our
future results of operations or financial condition.
The following table presents our unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated balance sheet data as of June 30, 2010 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
Health care properties
|
|
$
|
257,155
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
72,257
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
330,992
|
|
Long term debt
|
|
$
|
158,075
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
330,992
|
|
The following table presents our unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated operating data for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009 (in
thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
six months
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
year ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income
|
|
$
|
8,619
|
|
|
$
|
17,140
|
|
Net residence services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
8,619
|
|
|
$
|
17,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits
|
|
|
1,362
|
|
|
|
2,676
|
|
Real estate taxes and insurance
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
984
|
|
Property acquisition costs
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,321
|
|
|
|
6,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
$
|
5,796
|
|
|
$
|
11,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income
|
|
|
2,823
|
|
|
|
6,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and loan cost amortization
|
|
|
(2,119
|
)
|
|
|
(4,994
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
704
|
|
|
$
|
1,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
9,099,324
|
|
|
|
9,099,324
|
|
Other Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations
|
|
$
|
4,025
|
|
|
$
|
8,040
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
6,144
|
|
|
$
|
13,034
|
|
58
Selected pro
forma financial information
The following table presents a reconciliation of our pro forma
net income to pro forma FFO for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
six months
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
year ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
704
|
|
|
$
|
1,397
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,321
|
|
|
|
6,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations
|
|
$
|
4,025
|
|
|
$
|
8,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We consider FFO to be an indicative measure of operating
performance due to the significant effect of depreciation of
real estate assets on net income. We calculate FFO in accordance
with standards established by NAREIT which defines FFO as net
income or loss determined in accordance with GAAP, excluding
gains or losses from sales of property but including asset
impairment write downs, plus depreciation and amortization
(excluding amortization of deferred financing costs) of real
estate assets, and after adjustments for the portion of these
items related to unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.
In calculating FFO, net income is determined in accordance with
GAAP and includes the noncash effect of scheduled rent increases
throughout the lease terms. This is a GAAP convention requiring
real estate companies to report rental revenue based on the
average rent per year over the life of the leases. We believe
that by excluding the effect of depreciation, amortization and
gains or losses from sales of real estate, all of which are
based on historical costs and which may be of limited relevance
in evaluating current performance, FFO can facilitate
comparisons of operating performance between periods and between
other equity REITs. We also believe FFO captures trends in
occupancy rates, rental rates and operating costs. FFO was
developed by NAREIT as a relative measure of performance and
liquidity of an equity REIT in order to recognize that
income-producing real estate historically has not depreciated on
the basis determined under GAAP, which assumes that the value of
real estate diminishes predictably over time. In addition, we
believe FFO is frequently used by securities analysts, investors
and other interested parties in the evaluation of equity REITs.
However, FFO (1) does not represent cash generated from
operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP (which,
unlike FFO, generally reflects all cash effects of transactions
and other events that enter into the determination of net
income), (2) is not necessarily indicative of cash flow
available to fund cash needs and (3) should not be
considered as an alternative to net income determined in
accordance with GAAP as an indication of our operating
performance. FFO, as presented, may not be comparable to
similarly titled measures reported by other equity REITS.
Accordingly, we believe that in order to facilitate a clear
understanding of our pro forma operating results, FFO should be
considered only as supplemental information and only in
conjunction with our pro forma net income as reported in the
accompanying pro forma financial statements and notes thereto.
At this time, we have not made a determination regarding whether
adjustments to the manner in which FFO is calculated in order to
adjust for the effect of straight line rent, capital
expenditures, depreciation and other adjustments are appropriate
for our company. We will assess whether any such adjustments are
appropriate during our first year of operations following
completion of this offering.
59
Selected pro
forma financial information
The following table presents a reconciliation of our pro forma
net income to our pro forma EBITDA for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
six months
|
|
|
year ended
|
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
704
|
|
|
$
|
1,397
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,321
|
|
|
|
6,643
|
|
Interest expense and loan cost amortization
|
|
|
2,119
|
|
|
|
4,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
6,144
|
|
|
$
|
13,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) (calculated in accordance
with GAAP) excluding: (1) interest expense, (2) income
tax benefit or expense; and (3) depreciation and
amortization. We believe EBITDA is useful to us and to an
investor as a supplemental measure in evaluating our financial
performance because it excludes expenses that we believe may not
be indicative of our operating performance. By excluding
interest expense, EBITDA measures our financial performance
regardless of how we finance our operations and our capital
structure. By excluding depreciation and amortization expense,
which can vary by property based on factors unrelated to
property operating performance, we and our investors can more
accurately assess the financial performance of our portfolio.
Our management also uses EBITDA as one measure in determining
the value of acquisitions and dispositions. In addition, we
believe EBITDA is frequently used by securities analysts,
investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of
equity REITs, particularly in the health care and senior housing
industry. However, because EBITDA is calculated before recurring
cash charges such as interest expense and taxes and is not
adjusted for capital expenditures or other recurring cash
requirements of our business, it does not reflect the amount of
capital needed to maintain our properties nor does it reflect
trends in interest costs due to interest rate changes or
increased borrowings. EBITDA should be considered only as a
supplement to net income, net cash provided by operating
activities or any other financial and operating performance
measure prescribed by GAAP. Other equity REITs may calculate
EBITDA differently than we do and, accordingly, our calculation
of EBITDA may not be comparable to such other REITs EBITDA.
60
Managements
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations
You should read the following discussion in conjunction with
the information provided under the sections of this prospectus
entitled Risk Factors, Cautionary Note
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements, Selected Pro
Forma Financial Information, and Business and
our audited financial statements and the pro forma financial
statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this
prospectus. This discussion contains forward-looking statements
reflecting current expectations that involve risks and
uncertainties. Actual results and the timing of events may
differ materially from those contained in these forward-looking
statements due to a number of factors, including those discussed
in the sections entitled Risk Factors and
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
and elsewhere in this prospectus.
OVERVIEW
We are a self-advised real estate company that was organized in
April 2010 to acquire, own and actively asset manage
income-producing senior housing facilities that derive
substantially all of their revenues from private payment
sources, generate stable cash flows and have the potential for
long-term capital appreciation. As a newly formed company with
no business activity to date, we have no historical operating
history and only nominal assets, consisting of only cash
contributed in connection with our formation. See
Capitalization. However, shortly after completion of
this offering and the concurrent private placement, we expect to
complete the acquisition of six high quality senior housing
facilities located in Florida, Illinois, New Jersey, New York
and Virginia for an aggregate contractual purchase price of
$240.0 million excluding transaction costs and the
assumption of certain deposit liabilities, including
approximately $81.9 million in cash and the assumption of
approximately $158.1 million of in-place mortgage debt.
Substantially all of the revenues at these facilities are
derived from private payment sources.
We intend to elect and qualify to be treated as a REIT for
federal income tax purposes commencing with our short taxable
year ending December 31, 2010. We will own our senior
housing facilities and conduct substantially all operations
through our operating partnership, Legacy Healthcare Properties,
LP, and its subsidiaries. Upon completion of this offering and
the concurrent private placement, we will own a 100% partnership
interest in our operating partnership and be our operating
partnerships sole general partner. See Operating
Partnership and the Partnership Agreement.
For us to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we
cannot operate the senior housing facilities we acquire. We will
lease the facilities we acquire either to our TRS lessee which
will engage facility operators that are eligible
independent contractors to manage those facilities, or
directly to third-party facility operators under lease
agreements. We may also lease the individual units at certain of
our facilities directly to the residents at those facilities and
provide services to the residents through a TRS. Our TRS lessee
or any TRS service provider will be treated as a TRS for federal
income tax purposes and will be consolidated into our financial
statements in accordance with GAAP. However, since both our
operating partnership and our TRS lessee are controlled by us,
our principal source of funds from any facilities we lease to
our TRS lessee will, on a consolidated basis, be from the
operations of those facilities. Our principal source of funds
from any facilities we lease to third-party facility operators
or residents will be from rental income paid by our facility
operators under net lease agreements or by residents under lease
agreements with those residents. If our TRS lessee or any TRS
service provider provides services to the residents at a
facility, our consolidated revenue will include the fees earned
by these entities for those services and our consolidated
expenses will include the expenses incurred by these entities in
providing the services. The earnings of our TRS lessee or any
TRS service provider will be fully subject to taxation as a C
corporation, which will reduce our FFO and the cash otherwise
available for distribution to our stockholders.
61
Managements
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations
As further described in Material Federal Income Tax
Considerations, following the completion of this offering
and our receipt of the private letter ruling from the IRS that
we intend to request confirming our ability to lease the
six facilities we have under contract to our TRS lessee and
the regulatory approvals required to transfer the operating
licenses for these facilities to our TRS lessee, we intend to
lease these facilities to our TRS lessee and engage Senior
Lifestyle Management to manage the operations of these
facilities pursuant to a management agreement. Pending receipt
of these approvals, we will enter into new or assume existing
leases with affiliates of Senior Lifestyle Management, which we
expect to terminate upon receipt of the private letter ruling
and regulatory approvals. For more details regarding the terms
of the management agreement and the new and existing leases, see
BusinessOur PortfolioSenior Housing Facilities
Under Contract.
Our unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of
operations for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and for
the year ended December 31, 2009 included elsewhere in this
prospectus reflect the expected rental revenue to be received
pursuant to the terms of the new and existing leases with
affiliates of Senior Lifestyle Management with respect to the
six senior housing facilities we have under contract and do not
reflect the TRS lessee structure that we expect to put in place
upon receipt of the private letter ruling and regulatory
approvals. If we obtain such private letter ruling and
regulatory approvals and then lease the facilities to our TRS
lessee, the rental revenue presented in our unaudited pro forma
condensed combined statement of operations would no longer be
applicable and the operations of the facilities, by virtue of
the TRS lessee structure, would be reflected in our statement of
operations.
We estimate that, if we had completed the acquisition of the
six facilities we have under contract as of January 1,
2009, and implemented the TRS lessee structure immediately upon
completion of the acquisition, while our pro forma total
revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and the
year ended December 31, 2009 would have increased from
approximately $8.6 million and $17.1 million,
respectively, to approximately $21.9 million and
$43.4 million, respectively, our pro forma FFO for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and the year ended
December 31, 2009 would have been substantially consistent
with the pro forma FFO for the six months ended June 30,
2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009 presented
elsewhere in this prospectus.
Utilization of the TRS lessee structure for any or all of these
facilities would cause the revenues and expenses of the
underlying operations of the facilities to be reflected in our
results of operations, with such expenses inclusive of the
management fees paid to Senior Lifestyle Management pursuant to
the management agreement entered into by the TRS lessee. The TRS
lessee structure subjects us to the business risks inherent in
the facilities operations while allowing us to benefit
from any potential increase in revenues or cost efficiencies
achieved by the operations. Should we instead utilize the TRS
lessee structure for some but not all of these facilities, and
lease units in the facilities for which we do not utilize the
TRS lessee structure directly to the residents while using a TRS
to provide services to such residents, our results of
operations, cash flows, and the nature of our business risks and
opportunities would not change materially. Alternatively, if we
lease the facilities through net leases to the operators or
affiliates of the operators, we would recognize rental revenues
pursuant to the net leases and our results of operations would
benefit primarily from any rent escalators.
There can be no assurance, however, that we will obtain the
necessary regulatory approvals or be able to utilize the TRS
lessee structure as outlined above. If we obtain the necessary
rulings and regulatory approvals, there can be no assurance that
the revenues generated or operating expenses incurred by us will
be consistent with the revenues and operating expenses reflected
in the historical audited and unaudited financial statements of
SL Jupiter and the historical audited and unaudited financial
statements of Senior Lifestyle operators referenced below for
the six months ended June 30, 2010 and the year ended
December 31, 2009.
62
Managements
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations
We have included the historical audited and unaudited
consolidated financial statements of WSL IV, which reflect the
historical financial position and operating history of the owner
of five of the six senior housing facilities we intend to
acquire after the completion of this offering and the concurrent
private placement. We have included the historical audited and
unaudited consolidated financial statements of SL Jupiter, which
reflect the historical financial position and operating history
of the owner and operator of the sixth senior housing facility
we intend to acquire after the completion of this offering and
the concurrent private placement. We have also included the
historical audited and unaudited combined financial statements
of Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolio, which contain the historical
operating history of six limited liability companies (SL Bella
Terra, LLC, SL Barrington, LLC, SL Walden, LLC, SL Sage Harbor,
LLC, SL Castle Pointe, LLC and SL Chancellors Village,
LLC, which we collectively refer to as the Senior Lifestyle
operators) that operate the five senior housing facilities owned
by WSL IV. We will not acquire the Senior Lifestyle operators as
part of our intended acquisition of WSL IV or SL Jupiter;
however we believe these financial statements and the notes
thereto are meaningful to potential investors, since these
operations will be relevant to our future operating results
whether or not we implement the TRS lessee structure described
above.
See Selected Pro Forma Financial Information and the
pro forma financial statements and the related notes for
additional information.
FACTORS AFFECTING
OUR BUSINESS AND THE BUSINESS OF OUR FACILITY
OPERATORS
The success of our business is dependent on a number of
macroeconomic, demographic demand and industry fundamental
trends. These trends will influence our ongoing ability to
source accretive investment opportunities while other factors
will impact our facility operators ability to conduct the
operations of our facilities profitably and meet their
obligations to us.
Industry
trends
The number of Americans age 65 and older is expected to
grow significantly in aggregate numbers and as a relative
percentage of the total U.S. population. For example, the
United States Census Bureau projects that the segment of the
U.S. population age 65 and older will grow from a
combined 40.2 million in 2010 (13.0% of the total
population), to 54.8 million in 2020 (16.1% of the total
population) and to more than 72.0 million Americans
age 65 and older by 2030 (19.3% of the total population).
Supply fundamentals have been an important factor in previous
senior housing cycles, notably supply overhang due to
overbuilding in the late 1990s, which produced a sustained
period of lower supply growth that increased net absorption and
contributed to significant sustained rate increases within the
sector. According to NIC Map Data Analysis and the American
Senior Housing Associations 2009 State of Seniors Housing
report, construction starts and new unit delivery reductions
will cause industry supply growth to trend from an estimated
1.7% in 2008 to an estimated 1.3% for 2009, significantly below
the historical average supply growth rate of 4.8% since 1985. We
believe capital market dislocations, a scarcity of development
capital and continued challenging credit market conditions will
restrain supply growth in the near term.
For more information regarding industry trends, you should refer
to BusinessOur Market Opportunity.
Competitive
environment for health care real estate investing
We expect to compete for investment opportunities with
institutional investors, private equity investors, other REITs
and numerous local, regional and national owners, in each of our
target markets. Some of these entities may have substantially
greater financial resources than we do and may be able and
willing to accept more risk than we can prudently manage.
Competition generally may increase the bargaining
63
Managements
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations
power of property owners seeking to sell and reduce the number
of suitable investment opportunities offered to us or purchased
by us.
The senior housing industry is highly competitive. Senior
housing facilities we acquire will compete with other properties
for residents in our markets. In addition, we must compete
against home health care and other in home services which may
allow residents to extend their stay in their apartment or home.
Competitive factors include location, convenience, brand
affiliation, rates, range of services, facilities and amenities
or accommodations offered and quality of service. Competition in
the markets in which our facilities will operate will include
competition from existing, newly renovated and newly developed
senior housing facilities in the relevant segments. Competition
can adversely affect the occupancy and rates of our facilities,
and thus our financial results, and may require us to provide
additional amenities, incur additional costs or make capital
improvements that we otherwise might not choose to make, which
may adversely affect our profitability.
Liquidity and
access to capital
Although our governing documents contain no limitations on the
amount of debt that we can incur, we expect to maintain a
reasonably low-leverage capital structure and intend to target
on a long-term basis the sum of the outstanding principal amount
of our consolidated indebtedness and the liquidation preference
or redemption feature of any outstanding shares of preferred
stock of approximately 40% to 45% of the cost basis of our total
assets. In addition, our assumption of in-place mortgage debt in
connection with our initial acquisition may cause our
consolidated indebtedness to exceed the general limitation
described above.
We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements
generally through net cash provided by operations, existing cash
balances and, if necessary, short-term borrowings under a future
revolving credit facility. We believe that net cash provided by
operations will be adequate to fund operating requirements,
including management fee payments made to our facility
operators, to pay interest on any borrowings and fund dividends
in accordance with the requirements to qualify as a REIT under
federal income tax laws.
Our indebtedness outstanding upon the completion of this
offering and the acquisition of our initial portfolio of senior
housing facilities will be comprised principally of secured
mortgage debt. Following the anticipated application of the net
proceeds of this offering, we expect to have approximately
$158.1 million of outstanding indebtedness, all of which
will mature in 2013.
Factors affecting
our operators profitability
Our revenues will be derived principally from rents we receive
from net leases with our facility operators or from rents we
receive from our TRS lessee pursuant to net leases if we are
able to utilize the TRS lessee structure. Certain economic
factors present both opportunities and risks to our facility
operators and, therefore, influence their ability to meet their
obligations to us. These factors will directly affect our
facility operators operations and, given our reliance on
their performance under our leases and management agreements,
will present risks to us that may affect our results of
operations or ability to meet our financial obligations.
Labor and related expenses typically represent our facility
operators largest cost component. Therefore, the labor
markets in which our facility operators operate will affect
their ability to operate cost effectively and profitably. In
order for our facility operators to be successful, they must
possess the management capability to attract and maintain
skilled and motivated workforces. Much of the required labor
needed to operate senior housing facilities requires specific
technical experience and education. As a result, our facility
operators may be required to increase their payroll costs to
attract labor and adequately staff their operations. Increases
in labor costs due to higher wages and greater employee
64
Managements
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations
benefits required to attract and retain qualified personnel
could affect our facility operators ability to meet their
obligations to us.
For the facilities we net lease, we will seek to establish our
rent at an appropriate level so that our facility operators are
able to earn a reasonable return for their services and
performance. This requires discipline to ensure that we do not
overpay for the properties we acquire and negotiate long-term
lease contracts with facility operators which fairly compensate
us and them for the investment and operating risks associated
with the business. While we operate in a competitive
environment, we carefully assess the long-term risks facing our
facility operators as we consider an investment. Because our
leases are long-term arrangements, we are required to assess
both the short and long-term capital needs of the properties we
acquire. The senior housing facilities on which we focus are
generally highly specialized real estate assets. We believe our
dedicated management team has developed broad expertise in
assessing the short and long-term needs of this asset class.
RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
As of the date of this prospectus, we have no operations because
we have been in our organizational stage. We will not commence
operations until we have closed the sale of all or a portion of
the shares of our common stock offered hereby. Following the
completion of this offering and the acquisition of our initial
portfolio of facilities, our operations will consist primarily
of revenues from the facility operators who will lease our
facilities and our expenses will consist primarily of general
and administrative expenses, salaries and benefits, interest
expense on the mortgage debt we will assume, insurance costs and
other general overhead expenses.
COMPONENTS OF OUR
REVENUES AND EXPENSES
This section describes what we expect will be the components of
our revenues and expenses following the completion of the
acquisition of our initial portfolio of facilities. The
components of our revenues and expenses are dependent upon
whether our properties are leased to a third-party tenant who
operates the facilities under a net lease agreement or we lease
our properties to our TRS lessee and the TRS lessee enters into
a management agreement with a qualified independent contractor
to operate the
day-to-day
operations of the facility, which we refer to as the TRS lessee
structure.
Revenues
Our rental income from our initial portfolio will consist
primarily of the rents received from affiliates of Senior
Lifestyle Management pursuant to new or existing leases. The
leases contain scheduled changes in rent payments, and, as a
result, rental income will include unbilled rent relating to the
straight-lining of rent based upon the cumulative rent to be
paid pursuant to the leases recognized ratably over the term of
the lease.
In addition to rent payable by affiliates of Senior Lifestyle
Management, our revenue may include other cash payments owed to
us by affiliates of Senior Lifestyle Management.
To the extent that we lease our facilities to our TRS lessee
whose operations will be consolidated into our financial
statements, we will also recognize rental income from residents
at our facilities as well as resident services revenue.
Expenses
We will recognize a variety of cash and non-cash charges in our
financial statements. Our cash expenses will consist primarily
of general and administrative expenses, salaries and benefits,
insurance costs, interest expense on the borrowings we will
assume in connection with the acquisition of our initial
65
Managements
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations
portfolio and other corporate overhead. Our general and
administrative costs will consist primarily accounting, legal
and other professional fees. Our non-cash expenses will consist
primarily of stock-based compensation expenses. To the extent
that we lease our facilities to our TRS lessee whose operations
will be consolidated into our financial statements, we will
recognize expenses related to the operation of our facilities,
including salaries, marketing costs, utilities and repairs and
maintenance.
Change in fair
value of derivatives
The long-term debt agreements we will assume in connection with
the acquisition of our initial portfolio are floating rate
obligations. We will be required to obtain an interest rate cap
for these floating rate obligations. In accordance with GAAP,
all derivatives, including certain derivative instruments
embedded in other contracts, are to be recorded as either an
asset or liability measured at their fair value. We will
recognize any changes in the fair value of the cap agreements in
equity as a component of other comprehensive income.
Depreciation and
amortization
We will incur depreciation expense on all of our acquired
long-lived assets and amortization expense on any intangible
assets acquired with an estimated useful life, resulting from
the required application of purchase accounting in the initial
recording of our real estate acquisitions. This non-cash expense
is designed under GAAP to reflect the economic useful lives of
our assets.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Below is a discussion of the accounting policies that we believe
will be critical once we commence operations. We consider these
policies critical because they require estimates about matters
that are inherently uncertain, involve various assumptions and
require significant management judgment, and because they are
important for understanding and evaluating our reported
financial results. These judgments will affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements
and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the
reporting periods. Applying different estimates or assumptions
may result in materially different amounts reported in our
financial statements. From time to time, we will re-evaluate our
estimates and assumptions. In the event estimates or assumptions
prove to be different from actual results, adjustments would be
made in subsequent periods to reflect more current estimates and
assumptions about matters that are inherently uncertain.
Revenue
recognition
For properties leased to our TRS lessee, we will recognize
rental income as earned under rental agreements with the
residents of our facilities which typically have terms of one
year or less. We also will recognize resident services revenue,
which consists of ancillary charges to residents for services
such as personal care and assistance with daily living
activities, upon completion of the applicable service.
For properties net leased to facility operators, we will
recognize rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the lease
term when collectability is reasonably assured and the facility
operator has taken possession or controls the physical use of
the leased facility. For facilities acquired subject to leases,
we will recognize revenue upon acquisition of the facility
provided the facility operator has taken possession or controls
the physical use of the leased facility. If the lease provides
for tenant improvements, we will determine whether the tenant
improvements, for accounting purposes, are owned by the facility
operator or us. When we are the owner of the tenant
improvements, the facility operator will not be considered to
have taken physical possession or have control of the physical
use of the leased facility until the tenant improvements are
substantially completed. When the facility operator is the owner
of the tenant improvements, any tenant
66
Managements
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations
improvement allowance funded will be treated as a lease
incentive and amortized as a reduction of revenue over the lease
term. The determination of ownership of the tenant improvements
will be subject to significant judgment. If our assessment of
the owner of the tenant improvements for accounting purposes
were to change, the timing and amount of our revenue recognized
would be impacted.
Certain leases with facility operators may provide for
additional rents contingent upon a percentage of the
facilitys revenue in excess of specified base amounts or
other thresholds. Such revenue will be recognized when actual
results reported by the facility operator, or estimates of
facility operator results, exceed the base amount or other
thresholds. The recognition of additional rents will require us
to make estimates of amounts owed and to a certain extent will
be dependent on the accuracy of the facility results reported to
us by the facility operator. Our estimates may differ from
actual results, which could be material to our consolidated
financial statements.
We will maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts, including
an allowance for straight-line rent receivables, for estimated
losses resulting from facility operator defaults or the
inability of facility operator to make contractual rent and for
estimated losses resulting from residents defaults or inability
of the residents to make their contractual rent payments. We
will monitor the liquidity and creditworthiness of our facility
operators on an ongoing basis. For facility operators this
evaluation will consider industry and economic conditions,
property performance, credit enhancements and other factors. For
straight-line rent amounts, our assessment will be based on
income recoverable over the term of the lease. We will exercise
judgment in establishing allowances and consider payment history
and current credit status in developing these estimates. These
estimates may differ from actual results, which could be
material to our consolidated financial statements.
Real
estate
We will make estimates as part of our allocation of the purchase
price of acquisitions of properties to the various components of
the acquisition based upon the relative value of each component.
Upon acquisition, we allocate the purchase price based on the
fair value of the acquired land, building, furniture, fixtures
and equipment, identifiable intangible assets, other assets and
assumed liabilities. Identifiable intangible assets typically
arise from contractual arrangements. We determine the
acquisition-date fair values of all assets and assumed
liabilities using methods similar to those used by independent
appraisers (e.g., discounted cash flow analysis) and that
utilize appropriate discount
and/or
capitalization rates and available market information, and we
utilize the services of independent third-party consultants to
perform valuation studies to support our determinations of the
fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors
including historical operating results, known and anticipated
trends, and market and economic conditions. Acquisition costs
are expensed as incurred.
Renovations to our health care properties
and/or
replacements of assets that improve or extend the life of the
asset are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated
useful lives. Furniture, fixtures and equipment under capital
leases are carried at the present value of the minimum lease
payments.
Repair and maintenance costs are charged to expense as incurred.
Depreciation and
amortization
Health care properties will be carried at cost and depreciated
using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of
25 to 40 years for buildings and one to seven years
for furniture, fixtures and equipment. Intangible assets arising
from contractual arrangements will typically be amortized over
the life of the contract.
67
Managements
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations
We will be required to make subjective assessments as to the
useful lives and classification of our properties for purposes
of determining the amount of depreciation expense to reflect
each year with respect to the assets. These assessments may
impact our results of operations.
Impairment of
long-lived assets and goodwill
We will assess the carrying value of our real estate assets and
related intangibles which we refer to as real estate assets,
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of a real estate asset or asset group may not be
recoverable. Goodwill will be tested at least annually by
applying the two-step approach. If the sum of the expected
future net undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying
amount of the real estate assets, an impairment loss will be
recognized by adjusting the assets carrying amount to its
estimated fair value. If the fair value of a reporting unit
containing goodwill is less than its carrying value, then a
second step of the test will be needed to measure the amount of
potential goodwill impairment. The second step will require the
fair value of the reporting unit to be allocated to all the
assets and liabilities of the reporting unit as if the reporting
unit had been acquired in a business combination at the date of
the impairment test. The excess of the fair value of the
reporting unit over the fair value of assets and liabilities
will be the implied value of goodwill and will be used to
determine the amount of impairment. The determination of the
fair value of real estate assets and goodwill will involve
significant judgment. This judgment will be based on our
analysis and estimates of fair value of real estate assets and
reporting units, and the future operating results and resulting
cash flows of each real estate asset whose carrying amount may
not be recoverable. Our ability to accurately predict future
operating results and cash flows and estimate and allocate fair
values will impact the timing and recognition of impairments.
While we believe our assumptions will be reasonable, changes in
these assumptions may have a material impact on our financial
results. A property will be considered held for sale when a
contract for sale is entered into, a substantial, non-refundable
deposit has been committed by the purchaser, and sale is
reasonably expected to close.
Stock-based
compensation
Prior to the completion of this offering and the concurrent
private placement, we will adopt our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan,
which provides for the grant of stock options, stock awards,
stock appreciation rights, performance units and other
equity-based awards. Equity-based compensation will be
recognized as an expense in our financial statements and
measured at the fair value of the award on the date of grant.
The amount of the expense may be subject to adjustment in future
periods depending on the specific characteristics of the
equity-based award and the application of the accounting
guidance.
Stock purchase
warrants
We account for stock purchase warrants as equity securities,
unless, based on the underlying terms of the stock warrant
agreement, the stock purchase warrants are determined to be
derivative instruments. We expect the warrants we may issue in
connection with this offering will be treated as equity
securities.
Income
taxes
We intend to elect to be taxed as a REIT under the Code and
intend to operate as such beginning with our short taxable year
ending December 31, 2010. We expect to have little or no
taxable income prior to electing REIT status. To qualify as a
REIT, we must meet certain organizational and operational
requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90%
of our annual REIT taxable income to our stockholders each year,
computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction or net
capital gain. As a REIT, excluding the taxes applicable to our
TRS lessee, we generally will not be subject to federal income
tax to the extent we currently distribute our taxable income to
our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable
year, we will be subject to federal income tax on our taxable
income at regular corporate income tax rates and generally will
not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT
68
Managements
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations
for federal income tax purposes for the four taxable years
following the year during which qualification is lost unless the
IRS grants us relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an
event could materially adversely affect our net income and net
cash available for distribution to stockholders. However, we
intend to organize and operate in such a manner as to qualify
for treatment as a REIT.
Even if we qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we
may still be subject to state and local taxes on our income and
assets and to federal income and excise taxes on our
undistributed income. Additionally, any income earned by our TRS
lessee, and any other TRS we form in the future, will be fully
subject to federal, state, and local corporate income tax.
As part of the process of preparing consolidated financial
statements, significant judgment is required of management to
evaluate our compliance with applicable REIT requirements. Our
determinations are based on our interpretations of tax laws, and
our conclusions may have an impact on the income tax expense
recognized. Events or circumstances which may require
adjustments to income tax expense include: (i) our ability
to qualify as a REIT, (ii) audits conducted by federal and
state taxing authorities, and (iii) changes in tax laws.
Business
combinations and property acquisition costs
Effective with our inception, we adopted Financial Accounting
Standards Board, or FASB, guidance related to business
combinations and property acquisitions, which requires the
acquiring entity in a business combination or asset purchase to
measure the assets acquired, liabilities assumed (including
contingencies) and any non-controlling interests at their fair
values on the acquisition date. The guidance also requires that
acquisition-related transaction costs be expensed as incurred,
acquired research and development value be capitalized and
acquisition-related restructuring costs be capitalized only if
they meet certain criteria. These costs, totaling $407,789, are
included in property acquisition costs on our consolidated
statement of operations for the period from inception to
June 30, 2010.
RECENTLY ISSUED
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In April 2009, the FASB issued additional disclosure provisions
of Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC,
825-10,
Financial InstrumentsOverall
, which we refer to as
ASC 825-10.
ASC 825-10
requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments
for interim reporting periods of publicly-traded companies in
addition to the annual financial statements.
ASC 825-10
is effective for interim periods ending after June 15,
2009. Prior period presentation is not required for comparative
purposes at initial adoption. The adoption of ASC
825-10
on
June 30, 2009 will not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In April 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to
ASC 320-10,
Investment-Debt and Equity SecuritiesOverall
, which
we refer to as
ASC 320-10.
ASC 320-10
amends the
other-than-temporary
impairment guidance for debt securities to make the guidance
more operational and to improve the presentation and disclosure
of
other-than-temporary
impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial
statements. The amended provision of
ASC 320-10
is effective for fiscal years and interim periods ending after
June 15, 2009. The adoption of
ASC 320-10
on June 30, 2009 will not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In April 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to
ASC 820-10,
Fair Value Measurements and DisclosuresOverall
,
which we refer to as
ASC 820-10.
ASC 820-10
provides additional guidance for estimating fair value when the
volume and level of activity for both financial and nonfinancial
assets or liabilities have significantly decreased.
ASC 820-10
is effective for fiscal years and interim periods ending after
June 15, 2009 and shall be applied prospectively. The
adoption of
ASC 820-10
on June 30, 2009 will not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
69
Managements
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations
In May 2009, the FASB issued ASC 855,
Subsequent
Events
, which we refer to as ASC 855. ASC 855
provides general guidelines to account for the disclosure of
events that occur after the balance sheet date but before
financial statements are issued or available to be issued. These
guidelines are consistent with current accounting requirements,
but clarify the period, circumstances, and disclosures for
properly identifying and accounting for subsequent events.
ASC 855 is effective for interim periods and fiscal years
ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of ASC 855 on
June 30, 2009 will not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
No. 2009-17,
Consolidations (Topic 810): Improvements to Financial
Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest
Entities
, which we refer to as Update
No. 2009-17.
Update
No. 2009-17
requires enterprises to perform a qualitative approach to
determining whether or not a variable interest entity will need
to be consolidated on a continuous basis. This evaluation will
be based on an enterprises ability to direct and influence
the activities of a variable interest entity that most
significantly impact its economic performance. Update
No. 2009-17
is effective for interim periods and fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2009. The adoption of Update
No. 2009-17
will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, or the
Codification, was issued in the form of ASC 105,
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
, which we refer
to as ASC 105. Upon issuance, the Codification became the
single source of authoritative, nongovernmental U.S. GAAP.
The Codification reorganized GAAP pronouncements into accounting
topics, which are displayed using a single structure. Certain
SEC guidance is also included in the Codification and will
follow a similar topical structure in separate SEC sections.
ASC 105 is effective for interim periods and fiscal years
ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the
Codification will not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position or results of operations.
In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
No. 2009-04,
Accounting for Redeemable Equity InstrumentsAmendment
to
Section 480-10-S99
(SEC Update), which we refer to as Update
No. 2009-04.
This update requires that preferred securities, or instruments
with similar characteristics, such as noncontrolling interests,
that are redeemable for cash or other assets be classified
outside of permanent equity if they are redeemable (i) at a
fixed or determinable price on a fixed or determinable date,
(ii) at the option of the holder, or (iii) upon the
occurrence of an event that is not solely within the control of
the issuer. The SEC believes that it is necessary to highlight
the future cash obligations attached to this type of security so
as to distinguish it from permanent capital. The adoption of
Update
No. 2009-04
will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
No. 2010-02,
Consolidation (Topic 810): Accounting and Reporting for
Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiarya Scope
Clarification
. The amendments in this update clarify that a
decrease in ownership resulting from sales of in substance real
estate should be accounted for under the guidelines in ASC Sub
Topics
360-20,
Property, Plant, and Equipment, and ASC Sub Topics
976-605,
Retail/Land
. This update will not have a material impact on
our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
PRO FORMA
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Although our governing documents contain no limitations on the
amount of debt that we can incur, we expect to maintain a
reasonably low-leverage capital structure and intend to target
on a long-term basis the sum of the outstanding principal amount
of our consolidated indebtedness and the liquidation preference
or redemption feature of any outstanding shares of preferred
stock of approximately 40% to 45% of the cost basis of our total
assets. In addition, our assumption of in-place mortgage debt in
connection with our initial acquisition may cause our
consolidated indebtedness to exceed the general limitation
described above.
70
Managements
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations
We anticipate that our total pro forma consolidated indebtedness
will be approximately $158.1 million upon completion of the
acquisition of the six senior housing facilities we have under
contract.
Our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements consist
primarily of funding our operating expenses and other
expenditures directly associated with our properties, including:
|
|
Ø
|
Distributions paid to our stockholders pursuant to our
distribution policy and to maintain our REIT status;
|
|
Ø
|
Interest expense and scheduled principal payments on our
indebtedness;
|
|
Ø
|
Acquisition of properties;
|
|
Ø
|
Capital expenditures to improve our properties;
|
|
Ø
|
Recurring repairs and maintenance expenditures required to
maintain our properties; and
|
|
Ø
|
Certain taxes affiliated with our TRS lessee structure.
|
We expect to meet our short term liquidity needs through a
combination of the following:
|
|
Ø
|
Cash on hand;
|
|
Ø
|
Cash provided by operations;
|
|
Ø
|
Net proceeds from this offering;
|
|
Ø
|
Deposits from our membership programs; and
|
|
Ø
|
Reserves established for the replacement of furniture, fixtures
and equipment.
|
We expect to meet our long term liquidity needs through a
combination of the following:
|
|
Ø
|
Our ability to refinance borrowings on our properties;
|
|
Ø
|
Issuance of additional equity
and/or
debt
securities; and
|
|
Ø
|
Sources described above with respect to our short-term liquidity.
|
In addition to the sources described above, we intend to obtain
a revolving credit facility to provide us with additional
liquidity to, among other things, pursue acquisitions which may
require capital exceeding the funds raised in this offering.
There is no assurance that we will be successful in securing a
revolving credit facility on terms that are acceptable to us or
at all.
We do not currently intend to reserve funds to retire existing
secured or unsecured indebtedness upon maturity.
In order to remain qualified as a REIT, we are required to
distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, excluding
net capital gains and determined without regard to the dividends
paid deduction, to stockholders. We intend to pay distributions
to our stockholders on a quarterly basis pursuant to our
distribution policy, as more fully described under
Distribution Policy. In addition, we utilize our
capital to acquire or develop properties or entities that own
properties and invest in joint ventures that acquire and own
properties. Our properties will require recurring investment
related to capital expenditures and general capital improvements.
We intend to invest in senior housing facilities only as
suitable opportunities arise. In the near-term, we intend to
fund future investments in properties with the net proceeds of
this offering and the concurrent private placement and
borrowings assumed or executed in connection with such
acquisitions. Longer term, we intend to finance our additional
senior housing investments and scheduled debt maturities under
our mortgages with the net proceeds from additional issuances of
common stock and issuances of OP units in our operating
partnership and through long-term secured and unsecured
borrowings which we anticipate will have staggered maturities.
Over time, we intend to take advantage of the strength of
71
Managements
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations
the senior housing segment in obtaining attractive long-term
debt from government sponsored entities, or GSEs, such as the
Federal National Mortgage Association, or Fannie Mae, and the
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, or Freddie Mac. For
example, Fannie Mae is the lender of the approximately
$158.1 million of in-place mortgage debt that we will
assume in connection with the acquisition of our initial
portfolio of facilities.
Although we have no formal written agreement with
Mr. Hutchison or any of his affiliates to do so, we intend
to use approximately $0.1 million of the net proceeds of
this offering and the concurrent private placement to reimburse
out-of-pocket
costs incurred by Mr. Hutchison and his affiliates in
connection with our formation, approximately $0.6 million
to reimburse offering expenses which Mr. Hutchison has
advanced on our behalf, and approximately $0.7 million to
reimburse the costs incurred by Mr. Hutchison in connection
with the acquisition of our initial portfolio, primarily the
earnest money deposit that Mr. Hutchison advanced on our
behalf.
DEFERRED AND
REFUNDABLE ENTRANCE FEES
Our pro forma financial information includes the receipt and
recognition of member deposits and membership fee income
representing the required entrance fee paid by residents of
rented units, pursuant to a membership contract entered into at
the time of the execution of the residency agreement. Under most
membership arrangements, a portion of the upfront fee paid is
refundable to the resident in accordance with the underlying
residency agreement. The remaining amount of the entrance fee is
accounted for as deferred revenue and included in the balance of
other liabilities, and a portion is recognized each year as
membership fee revenue, depending upon the terms of the
residency agreement. Under the membership program, deposits
generally become refundable upon the members withdrawal
from the program and a request for a refund. However, for a
substantial majority of our deposits, our obligation to refund
the deposit of a member who has requested a refund occurs only
after we have entered into a new resident agreement with a new
resident upon the resale of the specific unit. We recognize a
liability for the membership deposits, which do bear interest,
and recognize the cash flow from these deposits. On a pro forma
basis, our accrued deposit liability pertaining to deferred and
refundable resident entrance fees was approximately
$15.7 million as of June 30, 2010.
COMMITMENTS
Upon the completion of the acquisition of our initial portfolio,
we expect to have long-term indebtedness totaling approximately
$158.1 million. The following table summarizes the
repayment schedule for such indebtedness for each of the years
from 2010 to 2013 assuming we do not exercise our conversion
right which would extend the term for up to 10 years (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
1,186
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2,477
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
2013
|
|
|
151,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
158,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
Managements
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations
PRO FORMA
CONSOLIDATED INDEBTEDNESS
We anticipate that, upon completion of the acquisition of our
initial portfolio, we will have approximately
$158.1 million of outstanding mortgage debt, all of which
will bear interest at a floating rate. This indebtedness is
expected to be comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Balance
as of
|
|
|
|
Interest
Rate
(1)
|
|
|
Maturity
Date
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
debt
(2)
|
|
|
3 month DMBS + 2.15
|
%
|
|
|
6/1/2013
|
|
|
$
|
125,050
|
|
Mortgage
debt
(3)
|
|
|
3 month DMBS + 2.15
|
%
|
|
|
6/1/2013
|
|
|
|
33,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Indebtedness
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
158,075
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The DMBS rate refers to the discounted
mortgage-backed securities rate quoted by Fannie Mae. The
weighted average DMBS rate for August 2010, based on reported
trades occurring during such month, was 0.2338%.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted mortgage debt
secured by Lake Barrington Woods, Bella Terra, Baywinde, Walden
Place and Chancellors Village.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Mortgage debt secured by Mangrove Bay. This mortgage debt is
not cross-collateralized or cross-defaulted.
|
MATERIAL
COVENANTS OF OUR PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED OUTSTANDING
INDEBTEDNESS
We expect that our outstanding pro forma indebtedness as a
result of the acquisition of our initial portfolio will be
secured by the individual health care facilities and the loans
will be cross-defaulted and cross-collateralized. We anticipate
that, in addition to the pro forma indebtedness, any additional
indebtedness incurred in connection with our acquisitions of
facilities or portfolios of facilities will generally contain
customary affirmative covenants, which are also found in our
outstanding pro forma indebtedness, specific to the facility or
facilities such as financial reporting and standard lease
requirements and negative covenants, including, among others,
restrictions on or require approval for the borrowers
ability to (i) create or incur additional liens or
indebtedness, (ii) transfer the facility or an interest in
the facility, (iii) merge or consolidate with or into, or
convey, transfer or dispose of all or substantially all of its
assets to or in favor of, any other person and (iv) change
the management of the facilities.
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS
As of the date of this prospectus, we have entered into the
purchase and sale agreement relating to the acquisition of our
initial portfolio. Other than this purchase and sale agreement,
we do not have any other material contractual obligations.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET
ARRANGEMENTS
As of the date of this prospectus, we had no off-balance sheet
transactions.
FUNDS FROM
OPERATIONS
One of our objectives is to provide cash distributions to our
stockholders from cash generated by our operations. Due to
certain unique operating characteristics of real estate
companies, NAREIT, an industry trade group, has promulgated a
measure known as funds from operations, or FFO, which it
believes more accurately reflects the operating performance of a
REIT such as us. FFO is not equivalent to our net income or loss
as determined under GAAP.
We define FFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the standards
established by the White Paper on FFO approved by the Board of
Governors of NAREIT, as revised in February 2004, or the White
Paper.
73
Managements
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations
The White Paper defines FFO as net income or loss computed in
accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses from sales of
property but including asset impairment writedowns, plus
depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of
deferred financing costs) of real estate assets, and after
adjustments for the portion of these items related to
unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for
unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to
reflect FFO.
We consider FFO to be an appropriate supplemental measure of a
REITs operating performance as it is based on a net income
analysis of property portfolio performance that excludes
non-cash items such as depreciation. The historical accounting
convention used for real estate assets requires straight-line
depreciation of buildings and improvements, which implies that
the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over
time. Since real estate values historically rise and fall with
market conditions, presentations of operating results for a
REIT, using historical accounting for depreciation, could be
less informative. The use of FFO is recommended by the REIT
industry as a supplemental performance measure.
Presentation of this information is intended to assist the
reader in comparing the operating performance of different
REITs, although it should be noted that not all REITs calculate
FFO the same way, so comparisons with other REITs may not be
meaningful. Furthermore, FFO is not necessarily indicative of
cash flow available to fund cash needs and should not be
considered as an alternative to net income as an indication of
our performance. Our FFO reporting will comply with
NAREITs policy described above. For additional
information, see Selected Pro Forma Financial
Information.
At this time, we have not made a determination regarding whether
any adjustments to the manner in which we calculate FFO in order
to adjust for the effect of straight line rent, capital
expenditures, depreciation and other adjustments are appropriate
for our company. We will assess whether any such adjustments are
appropriate during our first year of operations following
completion of this offering.
QUANTITATIVE AND
QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS
Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest
rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity
prices and other market changes that affect market sensitive
instruments. In pursuing our business plan, we expect that the
primary market risk to which we will be exposed is interest rate
risk.
We may be exposed to the effects of interest rate changes
primarily as a result of long-term debt used to acquire
properties and make loans and other permitted investments. Our
interest rate risk management objectives will be to limit the
impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and
to lower overall borrowing costs while taking into account
variable interest rate risk. To achieve our objectives, we may
borrow at fixed rates or variable rates. We may also enter into
derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps and
caps in order to mitigate our interest rate risk on a related
financial instrument. In connection with our assumption of the
in-place mortgage debt that is secured by the initial portfolio
of facilities that we have under contract, we will be required
to enter into an interest rate cap. We will not enter into
derivative transactions for speculative purposes.
We estimate that a one-percentage point increase in the variable
interest rate on our outstanding pro forma indebtedness as of
June 30, 2010 and as of December 31, 2009 would have
resulted in additional interest expense of approximately
$0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010
and approximately $1.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
In addition to changes in interest rates, the value of our
future investments is subject to fluctuations based on changes
in local and regional economic conditions and changes in the
creditworthiness of facility operators, which may affect our
ability to refinance our debt if necessary.
Upon completion of the acquisition of the six senior housing
facilities that we currently have under contract, an affiliate
of Senior Lifestyle Management is expected to account for
substantially all of our revenues. This concentration of credit
risk in one facility operator makes us more vulnerable
74
Managements
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations
economically than if we entered into leases and management
agreements with several facility operators. Any adverse
developments in this facility operators business and
affairs, financial strength or ability to operate our facilities
efficiently and effectively could have a material adverse effect
on our results of operations. We cannot assure you that this
facility operator will have sufficient assets, income and access
to financing and insurance coverage to enable it satisfy its
lease obligations to us or effectively and efficiently operate
the six facilities we intend to acquire with a portion of the
net proceeds from this offering and the concurrent private
placement. The failure or inability of this facility operator to
satisfy its lease obligations to us or effectively and
efficiently operate these facilities would materially reduce our
revenues and net income, which could in turn reduce the amount
of our distributable cash and cause our stock price to decline.
Our pursuit of any remedies upon a default under any agreement
between us and the facility operator may be impacted by our
consideration of the effect such remedies will have on other
facilities leased to or managed by the facility operator.
INFLATION
We expect to be exposed to inflation risk as income from future
long-term leases will be a significant source of our cash flows
from operations. For our leased facilities, we expect there to
be provisions in the majority of our leases that will protect us
from the impact of inflation. These provisions may include rent
steps, reimbursement billings for operating expense pass-through
charges, and real estate tax and insurance reimbursements on a
per square foot allowance. However, due to the long-term nature
of the anticipated leases, they may not re-set frequently enough
to cover inflation. For our non-leased facilities, we will be
subject to inflation risks if our facility operators are unable
to increase the costs of services provided by them at our
facilities to negate the effects of inflation.
75
Business
OUR
COMPANY
We are a self-advised real estate company that was recently
organized to acquire, own and actively asset manage
income-producing senior housing facilities that derive
substantially all of their revenues from private payment
sources, generate stable cash flows and have the potential for
long-term capital appreciation. Shortly after completion of this
offering and the concurrent private placement, we expect to
complete the acquisition of six high quality senior housing
facilities located in Florida, Illinois, New Jersey, New York
and Virginia for an aggregate contractual purchase price of
$240.0 million excluding transaction costs and the
assumption of certain deposit liabilities. We believe the
markets in which these facilities are located exhibit strong
demand, high barriers to entry and limited new supply. These
facilities contain 1,042 independent and assisted living units
with a weighted average occupancy of approximately 88.7% for the
six months ended June 30, 2010. Substantially all of the
revenues at these facilities are derived from private payment
sources. The acquisition of these facilities demonstrates our
ability to execute our growth strategy and acquire senior
housing facilities that meet our targeted acquisition criteria.
We were formed in April 2010 to utilize the substantial
experience and extensive network of relationships in the senior
housing and real estate industries of our management team, which
is led by Thomas J. Hutchison III, our Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, to identify and acquire independent living
facilities, assisted living facilities, which may include
Alzheimers/dementia care units or free-standing
Alzheimers/dementia care facilities, and continuing care
retirement communities which, in each case, generate
substantially all of their revenues from private payment
sources. We will generally target high quality facilities that
occupy a market leading position within their local markets and
are located in and around metropolitan areas with strong
demographic profiles, high barriers to entry and limited new
supply, as well as in destination retirement areas such as
California, Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina and Texas.
While not a primary focus of our strategy, we may also
opportunistically acquire additional types of senior housing
facilities, including but not limited to senior apartments and
skilled nursing facilities.
We intend to capitalize on our management teams prior
experience in utilizing creative and flexible acquisition, lease
and management structures to facilitate acquisitions and, where
appropriate, to participate on an after-tax basis in operating
improvements and capture potential growth in facility-level cash
flows. We may, for example, lease certain facilities to our TRS
lessee, which will contract with facility operators to operate
these facilities, or lease our facilities to facility operators
pursuant to net leases that will provide for the payment of base
rent subject to annual escalators and require additional
percentage rent based on gross revenues. For certain facilities,
such as skilled nursing facilities, that possess slower growth
characteristics or reimbursement risk from government programs
such as Medicare and Medicaid, we may use traditional net lease
structures even if the facilities are eligible for the TRS
lessee structure. Alternatively, we may lease the units in
certain facilities directly to the residents and form a TRS to
provide services to the residents.
A key element of our strategy is to employ a dedicated and
experienced asset management team to proactively manage our
facility operators in order to improve operational performance
and enhance the return on our investments. We plan to dedicate
substantially more resources to asset management than many
companies in our industry, which we believe will provide us with
a competitive advantage. Although we do not intend to operate
our facilities, our management team and the asset managers we
intend to employ will actively participate with our facility
operators in various aspects of the operations of our
facilities, including property positioning and repositioning,
operations analysis, physical design, renovation,
76
Business
capital improvements, resident experience and overall strategic
direction. Our facilities will be managed by or leased to
experienced operators that we believe have track records of
growth and profitability.
We believe the current market presents an attractive environment
for us to invest in senior housing facilities. We expect the
supply of suitable acquisition opportunities to grow as
(i) senior housing operators seek to monetize real estate
assets to fund growth in their core businesses,
(ii) investment managers seek liquidity for investors in
limited life funds and (iii) senior housing owners,
operators and investors continue to face challenges refinancing
debt used to acquire or develop senior housing facilities at
peak-market prices during the period from 2003 to 2007.
Moreover, we believe we will face less competition in the senior
housing market compared to other commercial real estate sectors
since generalist real estate investors have refocused on
distressed assets in the multifamily, industrial, office and
retail sectors in preference to the senior housing sector. In
addition, senior housing cash flows should benefit from
favorable demand and supply dynamics. Specifically, we believe
that senior housing cash flows will benefit as occupancy levels
revert to historical averages. This reversion will be driven by
favorable demographic trends and limited supply growth given
capital constraints in the senior housing industry and the
overall economy.
Upon completion of this offering, the concurrent private
placement and the acquisition of the six senior housing
facilities that we currently have under contract, we expect to
have approximately $72.3 million of cash available to
invest in additional senior housing facilities. We believe our
growth-oriented capital structure, together with our management
teams extensive network of long-standing relationships in
the senior housing and real estate industries and the
teams depth of experience in using creative and flexible
transaction structures, position us to take advantage of the
opportunities described above.
We intend to elect and qualify to be taxed as a REIT for federal
income tax purposes commencing with our short taxable year
ending December 31, 2010 and to hold our assets and conduct
our operations through an operating partnership and other
subsidiaries, including TRSs.
OUR MANAGEMENT
TEAMS TRACK RECORD
Our management team has a proven track record of acquiring
senior housing facilities and creating value for investors. Our
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Thomas J. Hutchison III,
has more than 30 years of experience in the senior housing
and real estate industries, including having served as the
former Chief Executive Officer of CNL Retirement and CNL Hotels.
Our President and Chief Operating Officer, Phillip M. Anderson,
Jr., has more than 25 years of experience in the senior
housing and real estate industries, including having served as
the former Chief Operating Officer of CNL Retirement.
Mr. Hutchison served in various capacities as an executive
officer of CNL Retirement, CNL Hotels and CNL Lifestyle
Properties, Inc. (formerly CNL Income Properties, Inc.).
Mr. Hutchison served as Chief Executive Officer and
President of CNL Retirement from August 2003 to September 2005,
as President from June 2002 to August 2003 and as Executive Vice
President from February 2000 to June 2002. Mr. Hutchison
served as Chief Executive Officer of CNL Hotels from February
2003 to April 2007, as President from June 2002 to March 2003,
and as Executive Vice President from May 2000 to June 2002.
Mr. Hutchison served as Chief Executive Officer of CNL
Income Properties from August 2003 to August 2005 and as
President from August 2003 to April 2004. In addition,
Mr. Hutchison served as an executive officer of CNL
Retirement Corp., the external advisor of CNL Retirement, from
May 2000 to September 2005; of CNL Hospitality Corp., the
external advisor of CNL Hotels, from May 2000 to April 2005; and
of CNL Income Corp., the external advisor of CNL Income
Properties, from August 2003 to August 2005. Phillip M.
Anderson, Jr., our President and Chief Operating Officer, served
as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of CNL
Retirement and its external advisor from 1999 until October
2006. Mr. Hutchison and Mr. Anderson, as well as other
real estate professionals that included other members of our
management team, as well as individuals who are not affiliated
with our company, oversaw the investment of approximately
$2.7 billion in equity capital that was raised by CNL
Retirement. In particular, during their respective terms of
service as executives at CNL Retirement, Mr. Hutchison was
instrumental in identifying acquisition opportunities and
negotiating the material terms of such acquisitions and
Mr. Anderson had primary responsibility for underwriting
the senior
77
Business
housing acquisition opportunities, assessing the quality of
facility management and asset managing the facilities after they
were acquired, in addition to assisting Mr. Hutchison in
sourcing and negotiating the terms of acquisition opportunities.
Moreover, after Mr. Hutchison resigned from his positions
with CNL Retirement, Mr. Anderson managed the performance
of all CNL Retirement senior housing and health care properties
and participated as a key member of the transaction team in
connection with the merger of CNL Retirement with HCP, Inc.
Mr. Hutchison and Mr. Anderson, together with other
officers and employees of CNL Retirement and its external
advisor that included other members of our management team, as
well as individuals who are not affiliated with our company,
contributed to the growth of CNL Retirement from a
start-up
company with no assets at the time of its formation in September
1998 into an SEC reporting health care REIT that, at the time of
its sale to HCP, Inc. in October 2006, owned more than 270
senior housing facilities and other health care properties. CNL
Retirement was externally managed and advised by an affiliate of
CNL Financial Group, Inc. and achieved returns primarily through
the payment of quarterly cash distributions to its stockholders.
During the period when Mr. Hutchison served as Chief
Executive Officer of CNL Retirement, which lasted from August
2003 to September 2005, and during each year Mr. Hutchison
served as Chief Executive Officer, CNL Retirement paid quarterly
cash distributions to its stockholders at an average annual rate
of 7.1%. During this period of time, CNL Retirement paid an
average quarterly dividend of $0.177 per share. These cash
distributions were funded primarily out of cash flow from
operations, proceeds of equity capital raises or debt. In
addition, from March 26, 2006 through June 15, 2006,
CNL Retirement stockholders were able to purchase through a
reinvestment plan shares of CNL Retirements common stock
at a purchase price of $9.50 per share.
Mr. Hutchison served as Chief Executive Officer of CNL Hotels
from February 2003 to April 2007. During the period when Mr.
Hutchison served as Chief Executive Officer through the fourth
quarter of 2006 (which is the last quarter in respect of which
CNL Hotels paid a dividend prior to its acquisition), and during
each year Mr. Hutchison served as Chief Executive Officer, CNL
Hotels paid quarterly cash distributions to its stockholders at
an average annual rate of 6.42%. During this period of time, CNL
Hotels paid an average quarterly dividend of $0.321 per
share, which dividends were funded primarily out of cash flow
from operations and borrowings. CNL Hotels was acquired by
Morgan Stanley Real Estate in April 2007 and, in connection with
this acquisition, certain of its assets were purchased by
Ashford Sapphire Acquisition LLC. Stockholders of CNL Hotels
received consideration of $20.50 per share as a result of
the sale to Morgan Stanley Real Estate and Ashford Sapphire
Acquisitions. Mr. Hutchison served as Chief Executive Officer of
CNL Income Properties from August 2003 to August 2005. CNL
Income Properties commenced paying quarterly dividends with the
third quarter of 2004. During the period from the third quarter
of 2004 through the end of Mr. Hutchisons tenure as
Chief Executive Officer, and during each year Mr. Hutchison
served as Chief Executive Officer, CNL Income Properties paid
quarterly cash distributions to its stockholders at an average
annual rate of 5.27% and an average quarterly dividend of
$0.132 per share, which dividends were largely funded using
proceeds of the companys continuous offering of common
stock and/or loans from affiliates. CNL Income Properties, which
is currently known as CNL Lifestyle Properties Inc., is still in
operation and is, therefore, not a completed program.
Our returns will differ from the returns achieved by CNL
Retirement, CNL Hotels and CNL Income Properties. We expect our
common stock will be publicly-traded on the NYSE following
completion of this offering. The market price of our common
stock will fluctuate and these fluctuations will impact our
returns. We can offer no assurance that a public trading market
for our common stock will develop or, if it does develop, that
it will be sustained. In addition, CNL Retirement, CNL Hotels
and CNL Income Properties paid substantial fees to their
affiliates, including their external managers. As an internally
managed REIT, we will not pay similar fees, and our cost
structure is expected to be substantially lower on an annual
basis compared to CNL Retirement, CNL Hotels and CNL Income
78
Business
Properties. Our use of leverage may differ from CNL Retirement,
CNL Hotels and CNL Income Properties. The use of leverage
impacts returns.
Adverse Business
Developments and External Market Factors
Each of CNL Retirement, CNL Hotels and CNL Income Properties was
impacted by general market trends and other external factors
that were unrelated to management actions. For example, the
returns that CNL Retirement was able to achieve for its
stockholders as described above were positively impacted by:
|
|
Ø
|
positive trends in the growth of persons in the United States
age 65 and older, which increased demand for the senior
housing assets owned by CNL Retirement;
|
|
Ø
|
positive trends in senior housing occupancy rates across the
entire senior housing industry, especially in the 2003 through
2006 period, which supported internal revenue growth across the
industry and in many of CNL Retirements assets;
|
|
Ø
|
a trend to lower capitalization rates (and therefore higher
market values) for senior housing assets, especially over the
2002 through 2006 period, which was fueled by a credit and
capital rich market environment;
|
|
Ø
|
positive economic and employment conditions, especially over the
2002 through 2006 period; and
|
|
Ø
|
modest annual average rate growth rates in the supply of new
senior housing in many markets, especially through 2005, which
supported internal revenue growth for existing facilities across
the industry.
|
However, CNL Retirement also faced considerable external
challenges as a result of selected overbuilding of senior
housing in certain markets. In some cases, this overbuilding
reduced monthly revenue rates that communities were able to
obtain for their services. The performance of CNL Retirement was
also impacted by adverse business developments that occurred in
connection with the operation of CNL Retirements business.
These included the purchase of certain properties as part of
larger portfolio acquisitions that were in need of significant
capital improvements or that were nonperforming. In some cases,
these properties were sold at a loss. CNL Retirement also funded
certain dividend payments using the proceeds of equity capital
raises or debt and, as a result, these dividends were treated as
a return of capital. For more information regarding external
market factors impacting CNL Retirement, see Market
Opportunity and Industry Overview.
CNL Hotels experienced significant challenges resulting from
severe downturns in the hospitality industry, such as the period
following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001,
which negatively affected CNL Hotels earnings. CNL Hotels
was also negatively impacted by certain adverse business
developments that occurred in connection with the operation of
CNL Hotels business. These included:
|
|
Ø
|
an attempt by CNL Hotels to complete a registered underwritten
public offering of shares of its common stock and a related
listing of the companys outstanding shares of common stock
in 2004, which offering and listing were abandoned;
|
|
Ø
|
an attempt by CNL Hotels to acquire CNL Hotels Corp., the
external advisor of CNL Hotels, through a merger in 2004, which
merger was abandoned and then subsequently renegotiated for a
substantially reduced amount of merger consideration; and
|
|
Ø
|
certain stockholder class action lawsuits that were filed
against various CNL Hotels affiliates, including certain
officers and directors of CNL Hotels and its external advisor,
including Mr. Hutchison, arising out of, among other
things, the terms of the proposed merger of CNL Hotels Corp.
into CNL Hotels, which lawsuits were settled.
|
79
Business
CNL Income Properties was negatively impacted by certain adverse
business developments that occurred in connection with the
operation of its business during the period when
Mr. Hutchison served as its Chief Executive Officer. These
included:
|
|
Ø
|
challenges associated with the formation and
start-up
of
a newly formed investment vehicle, including capital raising and
sourcing of acquisition opportunities;
|
|
Ø
|
the lack of focus on a specific property type; and
|
|
Ø
|
availability of debt financing for non-core real estate assets.
|
For additional information, please refer to Prior
Performance Summary and the Prior Performance Tables
included with this prospectus as Appendix A.
OUR COMPETITIVE
ADVANTAGES
We expect to have the following competitive advantages:
|
|
Ø
|
Proven track record of acquiring senior housing
facilities
. As discussed above under Our Management
Teams Track Record, our management team has a proven
track record of identifying and acquiring senior housing
facilities. Mr. Hutchison and Mr. Anderson, together
with other real estate professionals, that included other
members of our management team, as well as individuals who are
not affiliated with our company, oversaw the investment of
approximately $2.7 billion in equity capital that was
raised by CNL Retirement. Mr. Hutchison and
Mr. Anderson, together with other officers and employees of
CNL Retirement and its external advisor, contributed to the
growth of CNL Retirement from a
start-up
company with no assets at the time of its formation in September
1998 into an SEC reporting health care REIT that, at the time of
its sale to HCP, Inc. in October 2006, owned more than 270
senior housing facilities and other health care properties. CNL
Financial Group, Inc. and its affiliates are not sponsors of and
have no affiliation with our company, have not participated in
the preparation of this prospectus and are not endorsing our
company or an investment in our common stock.
|
|
Ø
|
Proven acquiror of senior housing facilities with access to
off-market acquisition opportunities.
Our management team
has substantial experience in the senior housing and real estate
industries:
|
|
|
|
|
Ø
|
Mr. Hutchison, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is
a real estate industry veteran with over 30 years of
experience in the real estate industry, including serving as a
principal overseeing the development, acquisition, management,
financing and disposition of commercial office, industrial,
multifamily residential, hospitality, senior housing and other
types of real estate. Mr. Hutchisons experience in
the senior housing industry includes over five years of
experience as an executive officer of CNL Retirement.
|
|
|
Ø
|
Mr. Anderson, our President and Chief Operating Officer,
has over 25 years of experience in the real estate
industry, including 13 years of experience overseeing the
development and acquisition of senior living communities and
hotel properties at Hyatt and seven years of experience as an
executive officer at CNL Retirement where he was instrumental in
sourcing and underwriting senior housing property acquisitions
and overseeing the asset management of such acquisitions after
they were acquired from its inception through October 2006 when
CNL Retirement was acquired by HCP, Inc. in a merger in which
the CNL Retirement stockholders received merger consideration
valued at $13.89 per share.
|
|
|
Ø
|
Mr. Patten, our Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, has approximately 8 years of experience
serving in various senior financial and accounting positions at
real estate industry companies with a focus in the lodging and
self-storage sectors, as well as approximately 12 years of
experience as an accountant at KPMG where he primarily served
publicly-traded companies with a focus on the real estate and
transportation industries.
|
80
Business
|
|
|
|
Ø
|
Mr. Hendrix, our Senior Vice President of Investments, has
been involved in the acquisition and management of senior
housing properties since he joined CNL Retirement in 2003, where
he served as its Director of Investments from 2003 through
October 2006 when CNL Retirement was acquired by HCP, Inc. After
the sale of CNL Retirement to HCP, Inc., Mr. Hendrix has
served as Managing Partner of HJK Consulting Group, LLC, a real
estate advisory business specializing in the senior housing
industry, from October 2006 to the present.
|
|
|
Ø
|
Mr. Krueger, our Senior Vice President of Portfolio
Management, has been involved in the acquisition and management
of senior housing and hotel properties since he joined CNL
Retirement in 2003, where he served as its Senior Manager of
Investments from 2003 until March 2005, and as its Director of
Asset Management from March 2005 through October 2006 when CNL
Retirement was acquired by HCP, Inc. After the sale of CNL
Retirement to HCP, Inc., Mr. Krueger served as Director of
Asset Management at HCP, Inc. until March 2007, and then as a
consultant to and later as Vice President of Investments for
Inland American Lodging Advisors until December 2008.
Mr. Krueger has served as Managing Partner of HJK
Consulting Group, LLC, a real estate advisory business
specializing in the senior housing industry, from October 2006
to the present.
|
In addition, our management team has developed an extensive
network of long-standing relationships with senior housing
owners, operators and developers, brokers, banks, insurance
companies, publicly-traded companies, fund managers, REITs,
private investors and other parties who invest in or otherwise
provide capital to the senior housing industry. We believe these
long-standing relationships will provide us with access to a
significant pipeline of off-market acquisition opportunities
that may not be available to other buyers. Some of these
relationships may include owners and operators with whom our
management team has previously completed senior housing
transactions while at CNL Retirement. We believe many of these
owners and operators will consider us a preferred acquiror due
to our management teams track record of completing fair
and timely senior housing acquisitions structured to align the
interests of owners and operators. We have identified a pipeline
of additional acquisition opportunities in various stages of
negotiation that consists of high quality independent and
assisted living facilities geographically dispersed throughout
our target markets that derive substantially all of their
revenues from private payment sources and otherwise satisfy our
acquisition criteria.
|
|
Ø
|
Attractive initial portfolio with strong embedded
growth.
Shortly after completion of this offering
and the concurrent private placement, we expect to complete the
acquisition of six senior housing facilities located in Florida,
Illinois, New Jersey, New York and Virginia for an aggregate
contractual purchase price of $240.0 million excluding
transaction costs and assumption of certain deposit liabilities.
We believe these facilities are high quality facilities that
occupy market-leading positions in markets with strong demand,
high barriers to entry and limited new supply. We believe the
acquisition of these facilities will provide us with a strong
platform to facilitate our future growth.
|
|
Ø
|
Internal growth focus.
Unlike many companies
in our industry that seek to generate internal growth through
annual rent escalators tied to increases in the CPI we intend to
structure our transactions, where appropriate, to capture
potential growth in facility-level cash flows on an after-tax
basis. Our management team has substantial experience
structuring net leases that require facility operators to pay,
in addition to base rent, percentage rent based on gross
revenues. In addition, Mr. Hutchison, who formerly served
as the Chief Executive Officer of CNL Hotels, Mr. Patten,
our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
Mr. Krueger, our Senior Vice President of Portfolio
Management, and certain of our director nominees have
substantial experience in the hospitality REIT industry where
the TRS lessee structure has been utilized since 2001. We
believe this gives us a competitive advantage to the extent we
implement the TRS lessee structure for certain facilities we
acquire.
|
|
|
Ø
|
Growth-oriented capital structure.
After the
completion of this offering, the concurrent private placement
and the acquisition of the six senior housing facilities that we
currently have under contract, we expect to have approximately
$72.3 million of cash to invest in additional facilities
|
81
Business
|
|
|
(assuming an initial public offering price of $18.50 per share,
which is the midpoint of the initial public offering range shown
on the cover of this prospectus). We believe certain of our
competitors face challenges from the recent economic downturn,
such as deteriorating facility-level cash flows and excessive
leverage combined with upcoming debt maturities, which will keep
management focused on balance sheet repair rather than pursuing
senior housing acquisitions. We will not have these issues,
which will enable the members of our management team to dedicate
substantial amounts of their time to sourcing, negotiating and
completing senior housing acquisitions. In addition to the cash
we will have available to invest in additional facilities after
we complete the acquisition of our initial portfolio and our
operating cash flow, we intend to obtain a revolving credit
facility to provide us with additional liquidity to, among other
things, pursue acquisitions which may require capital exceeding
the funds raised in this offering. There is no assurance that we
will be successful in securing a revolving credit facility on
terms that are acceptable to us or at all. We believe that as a
well-capitalized public company we will have access to multiple
sources of financing currently unavailable to many private
market buyers or overleveraged public companies.
|
|
|
Ø
|
Active asset management.
Given our strategy of
employing creative and flexible acquisition, leasing and
management structures to facilitate acquisitions and, where
appropriate, to participate on an after-tax basis in operating
improvements and capture potential growth in facility-level cash
flows, we plan to dedicate substantially more resources to asset
management than many companies in our industry, which we believe
will provide us with a competitive advantage. While at CNL
Retirement, our management team oversaw a portfolio of more than
270 senior housing facilities and other health care properties
and established a track record of effectively asset managing
those facilities and properties.
|
|
Ø
|
Committed management team with interests aligned with
stockholders
. Certain members of our management team will
invest $6.0 million in our common stock in the concurrent
private placement which will result in ownership by our
management team of approximately 3.56% of our outstanding common
stock upon the completion of this offering and the concurrent
private placement. We believe that our management teams
equity ownership in our company will strongly align the
teams interests with those of our stockholders.
|
OUR MARKET
OPPORTUNITY
We believe the weakened economy combined with the current
capital constrained environment presents a compelling
opportunity for well-capitalized companies to acquire high
quality private-pay senior housing facilities at attractive
prices. We believe many owners of senior housing facilities will
encounter challenges in refinancing or repaying upcoming debt
maturities, particularly for those senior housing facilities
acquired at peak-market prices with high loan-to-value ratios
during the period from 2003 to 2007. Lower facility-level cash
flows in conjunction with more conservative lending practices
will lead over-leveraged senior housing owners, operators and
investors to sell senior housing facilities at attractive
prices. We also expect liquidity constraints faced by financial
buyers, including investment managers of limited life funds,
will cause these non-operating owners to sell income-producing
senior housing facilities to provide liquidity to their
investors. Finally, we believe that sale lease back transactions
may be appealing to select senior housing operators who prefer
to deploy available capital into operations and away from real
estate ownership.
We believe that investors will face relatively less competition
in the senior housing market compared to other commercial real
estate sectors since generalist real estate investors have
refocused on distressed markets and core real estate asset
classes. We also believe the fragmented nature of health care
real estate and the specialized expertise needed to underwrite
these assets will restrain demand for senior housing facilities.
Our extensive relationships with leading senior housing owners,
operators, developers and investors and our growth-oriented
capital structure are expected to give us a competitive
advantage in acquiring these assets.
82
Business
We expect to benefit from a rebound in facility-level cash
flows, which will improve our investment yields and enhance our
total returns to stockholders. Deterioration in the residential
real estate market, including declines in median home sale
prices, and weakened consumer confidence have contributed to
lower occupancy rates in the senior housing industry as many
seniors have deferred the decision to sell their homes and
relocate to senior housing facilities. We believe that this
trend will reverse course as economic conditions improve,
residential real estate values stabilize, and consumer
confidence rises. We also believe owners of senior housing
facilities will continue to benefit from favorable demographics,
including growth in the total U.S. population age 65
and older and limited growth in new supply of senior housing
facilities as a result of the current capital constrained
environment.
For more information regarding the senior housing industry, see
the section of this prospectus entitled Market Opportunity
and Industry Overview.
OUR
PORTFOLIO
Senior housing
facilities under contract
Shortly after completion of this offering and the concurrent
private placement, we expect to complete the acquisition of six
senior housing facilities located in Florida, Illinois, New
Jersey, New York and Virginia for an aggregate contractual
purchase price of $240.0 million excluding transaction
costs and the assumption of certain deposit liabilities.
Approximately $81.9 million of the contractual purchase
price will be paid in cash. The remainder of the contractual
purchase price will be paid through our assumption of
approximately $158.1 million of in-place mortgage debt. The
contractual purchase price of $240.0 million is a
negotiated price based on our own valuation analysis of the
facilities. We did not obtain current independent appraisals of
these facilities.
We believe these facilities are high quality senior housing
facilities that are attractively situated in markets with strong
demand, high barriers to entry and limited new supply. These
facilities contain an aggregate of 1,042 units, consisting
of 635 independent living units and 407 assisted living units,
including 88 Alzheimers/dementia care units, with a
weighted average occupancy of approximately 88.7% for the six
months ended June 30, 2010. Substantially all of the
revenues generated at these facilities are derived from private
payment sources. The acquisition of these facilities
demonstrates our ability to execute our growth strategy and
acquire high quality senior housing facilities that meet our
targeted acquisition criteria.
The following table sets forth more information regarding the
senior housing facilities that we have under contract and expect
to acquire after completion of this offering and the concurrent
private placement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of assumed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
built/last
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
mortgage
|
|
|
|
Type of
|
|
|
of
units
|
|
|
major
|
|
|
|
|
purchase price
|
|
|
debt as of
|
|
Facility/location
|
|
facility
|
|
|
ILF
|
|
|
ALF
(1)
|
|
|
renovation
|
|
Occupancy
(2)
|
|
|
allocation
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
Lake Barrington Woods Lake Barrington, IL
|
|
|
ILF
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
95.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
64,981
|
|
|
$
|
43,512
|
|
Bella Terra Jackson, NJ
|
|
|
ILF
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
86.2
|
|
|
|
38,453
|
|
|
|
25,748
|
|
Baywinde Webster,
NY
(3)
|
|
|
ILF
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
88.1
|
|
|
|
44,800
|
|
|
|
29,770
|
(4)
|
Walden Place Cortland, NY
|
|
|
ALF
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
96.1
|
|
|
|
12,769
|
|
|
|
8,550
|
|
Chancellors Village Fredericksburg, VA
|
|
|
ILF
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
1989/1998
|
|
|
77.4
|
|
|
|
26,090
|
|
|
|
17,470
|
|
Mangrove Bay Jupiter, FL
|
|
|
ILF
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
94.3
|
|
|
|
52,907
|
|
|
|
33,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total/Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
|
|
88.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
240,000
|
|
|
$
|
158,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes 88 Alzheimers/dementia care units.
|
83
Business
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the occupancy
rates shown represent the average occupancy rate for the period
determined by calculating the average of the average monthly
occupancy rates for each month for the six months ended
June 30, 2010.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Consists of a campus that includes nine separate buildings,
eight of which are referred to as Castle Pointe and one of which
is referred to as Sage Harbor.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Consists of two mortgage loans.
|
In connection with the acquisition of the facilities that we
have under contract, we expect to assume an aggregate of
approximately $158.1 million of in-place mortgage debt
provided by Fannie Mae. The estimated cost of assuming this
mortgage debt is approximately $1.6 million. This mortgage
debt is comprised of seven individual mortgage loans, the
aggregate outstanding principal balance of which are set forth
in the table above, six of which (Lake Barrington, Bella Terra,
Baywinde, Walden Place and Chancellors Village) are
cross-collateralized, meaning each of the six properties serves
as collateral for each of the six loans, and cross-defaulted,
meaning a default of one loan would be an event of default for
the other five loans, and one of which (Mangrove Bay) is not
cross-collateralized or cross-defaulted. There are two mortgage
loans secured by the Baywinde facilities, one of which is
secured by the Castle Pointe buildings and the other of which is
secured by the Sage Harbor building. These mortgage loans
contain identical terms, except for the principal amount of each
mortgage loan. These mortgage loans otherwise bear interest at a
variable rate equal to the three-month Discounted
Mortgage-Backed Securities rate, as quoted by Fannie Mae, plus
2.15% and required interest only payments through June 1,
2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, and the year
ended December 31, 2009, the interest incurred for these
mortgage loans, excluding amortization of deferred loan costs,
was approximately $1.8 million and $4.4 million,
respectively. After June 30, 2010, the outstanding
principal balance amortizes based on scheduled principal
payments over a three-year period. These mortgage loans mature
on June 1, 2013 and are pre-payable at any time upon
payment of a prepayment penalty and all other sums due and
owing. Additionally, under these mortgage loans, the borrower
has the option to convert the loan to a fixed interest rate and
modify the terms of the loan, provided certain conditions are
met which conversion would extend the term of the loan up to ten
years.
Combined operating information for Lake Barrington Woods, Bella
Terra, Baywinde, Walden Place and Chancellors Village, the
senior housing facilities currently owned by WSL IV,
appears below. The revenue data reflects the revenue generated
by the Senior Lifestyle operators, the current facility
operators, and not WSL IV, the current owner of these
facilities. Our rental revenue will be derived from lease
payments made pursuant to lease agreements that we intend to
enter into with the current facility operators. We anticipate
that our rental revenue from the net leases for these five
facilities will approximate the EBITDA generated by these senior
housing facilities, exclusive of the impact of the
straight-lining of rents over the lease term, because the lease
payments payable by each tenant for the term of the applicable
lease have been set at amounts that are intended to approximate
the expected underlying net cash flow of each facility.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
17,487,074
|
|
|
$
|
34,413,596
|
|
|
$
|
34,949,615
|
|
|
$
|
31,968,566
|
|
EBITDA
(1)
|
|
$
|
(32,367
|
)
|
|
$
|
(328,983
|
)
|
|
$
|
887,828
|
|
|
$
|
514,166
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
87.7%
|
|
|
|
90.7%
|
|
|
|
93.7%
|
|
|
|
92.8%
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) (calculated in
accordance with GAAP) excluding interest expense, income tax
benefit or expense, and depreciation and amortization. EBITDA
presented in the above table is derived from historical
financial information for these facilities prior to their
|
84
Business
|
|
|
|
|
acquisition by us. We believe that the presentation of EBITDA
provides useful supplemental information to us and to investors
regarding the financial performance of these facilities because
it excludes expenses that we believe may not be indicative of
the facilities operating performance. EBITDA is also a
factor in our evaluation of facility-level operating performance
and is one measure in determining the value of acquisitions;
however, EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to
net income, net cash provided by operating activities or any
other financial and operating performance measure prescribed by
GAAP. EBITDA was impacted by lease payments made by the current
facility operators to the current facility owner. On a combined
basis, these lease payments totaled approximately
$6.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010
and approximately $13.1 million, approximately
$12.3 million and approximately $10.5 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
These lease payments represent the only amounts payable by the
current facility operators to the current facility owner. The
decrease in EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2009, as
compared to EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2008,
was attributable to a nearly $0.8 million reduction in
rental revenue due to a slight decline in occupancy levels and
an increase of approximately $0.8 million in rent expense,
offset by approximately $0.3 million in increased revenue
from resident services. The EBITDA for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 was impacted by higher unit rental rates for
occupied units that were implemented during the period which
were offset by a reduction in average occupancy. A
reconciliation of EBITDA with net income (loss) calculated in
accordance with GAAP appears below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(132,403
|
)
|
|
$
|
(523,705
|
)
|
|
$
|
703,667
|
|
|
$
|
270,186
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
1,015
|
|
|
|
19,078
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
100,214
|
|
|
|
194,564
|
|
|
|
183,146
|
|
|
|
224,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA*
|
|
$
|
(32,367
|
)
|
|
$
|
(328,983
|
)
|
|
$
|
887,828
|
|
|
$
|
514,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
EBITDA does not reflect any corporate general and
administrative expense. See Selected Pro Forma Financial
Information.
|
Operating information for Mangrove Bay, which is currently owned
by SL Jupiter, appears below. The revenue data reflects revenue
generated by the ownership and operation of Mangrove Bay by SL
Jupiter for the periods presented. SL Jupiter, the current owner
of Mangrove Bay, is also the facility operator. Our rental
revenue will be derived from lease payments made pursuant to a
lease agreement that we intend to enter into with the current
facility owner/operator. We anticipate that our rental revenue
from the net lease for this facility will approximate the EBITDA
generated by this senior housing facility, exclusive of the
impact of straight-lining of rents over the lease term, because
the lease payment payable
85
Business
by the tenant for the term of the lease have been set at an
amount that is intended to approximate the expected underlying
net cash flow of the facility.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
4,422,490
|
|
|
$
|
8,970,341
|
|
|
$
|
8,826,357
|
|
|
$
|
9,030,410
|
|
EBITDA
(1)
|
|
$
|
1,748,320
|
|
|
$
|
3,528,263
|
|
|
$
|
3,176,816
|
|
|
$
|
3,332,612
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
94.3%
|
|
|
|
97.6%
|
|
|
|
94.1%
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
EBITDA for the periods presented was not impacted by a lease
payment as no lease was in place for this facility. The EBITDA
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was impacted by a
decline in average occupancy during the period which was offset
by an increase in revenues from residential services and a
reduction in operating expenses. A reconciliation of EBITDA with
net income (loss) calculated in accordance with GAAP appears
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
803,072
|
|
|
$
|
1,504,589
|
|
|
$
|
596,550
|
|
|
$
|
272,812
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
390,426
|
|
|
|
952,174
|
|
|
|
1,401,692
|
|
|
|
1,989,196
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
554,822
|
|
|
|
1,071,500
|
|
|
|
1,178,574
|
|
|
|
1,070,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA*
|
|
$
|
1,748,320
|
|
|
$
|
3,528,263
|
|
|
$
|
3,176,816
|
|
|
$
|
3,332,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
EBITDA does not reflect any corporate general and
administrative expense. See Selected Pro Forma Financial
Information.
|
The following table provides the occupancy rates at the six
senior housing facilities that we have under contract for each
of the years in the four year period ended December 31,
2009 and for the partial year period ended December 31,
2005:
Occupancy
Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partial year
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
(1)
|
|
|
2008
(1)
|
|
|
2007
(2)
|
|
|
2006
(2)
|
|
|
2005
(2)(3)
|
|
|
|
|
Lake Barrington Woods
|
|
|
95.3
|
%
|
|
|
98.9
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
89.0
|
%
|
Bella Terra
|
|
|
88.1
|
%
|
|
|
88.1
|
%
|
|
|
81.4
|
%
|
|
|
79.1
|
%
|
|
|
78.2
|
%
|
Baywinde
|
|
|
94.7
|
%
|
|
|
97.8
|
%
|
|
|
97.7
|
%
|
|
|
96.9
|
%
|
|
|
95.3
|
%
|
Walden Place
|
|
|
98.1
|
%
|
|
|
97.9
|
%
|
|
|
94.2
|
%
|
|
|
93.9
|
%
|
|
|
86.3
|
%
|
Chancellors Village
|
|
|
80.9
|
%
|
|
|
85.1
|
%
|
|
|
92.0
|
%
|
|
|
93.3
|
%
|
|
|
94.9
|
%
|
Mangrove Bay
|
|
|
97.6
|
%
|
|
|
94.1
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
For the years ended 2008 and 2009, the occupancy rates shown
represent the average occupancy rate for the year determined by
calculating the average of the average monthly occupancy rates
for each month during the applicable year.
|
86
Business
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
For the years ended 2007 and 2006 and the partial year ended
2005, the occupancy rates shown represent the average occupancy
rate for the year determined by averaging the month-end
occupancy rates for each month during the year.
|
|
(3)
|
|
For the partial year ended 2005, the occupancy rates shown
are for partial year ownership based on the date the applicable
facility was acquired by the current owner, as follows: Lake
Barrington Woods and Bella Terra (March 4, 2005 to
December 31, 2005); Baywinde and Walden Place
(October 31, 2005 to December 31, 2005); and
Chancellors Village (November 18, 2005 to
December 31, 2005).
|
The following table provides the revenue per available unit in
the six senior housing facilities that we have under contract
for each of the years in the four year period ended
December 31, 2009 and the partial year period ended
December 31, 2005. The underlying revenue used to calculate
revenue per available unit is net of any sales concessions or
allowances and, accordingly, we believe revenue per available
unit is the substantive equivalent of net effective rent per
unit.
Revenue
Per Available
Unit
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partial year
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
(2)
|
|
|
2005
(2)(3)
|
|
|
|
Lake Barrington Woods
|
|
$
|
48,267
|
|
|
$
|
50,692
|
|
|
$
|
46,261
|
|
|
$
|
43,335
|
|
|
$
|
30,713
|
|
Bella Terra
|
|
$
|
39,785
|
|
|
$
|
40,886
|
|
|
$
|
35,367
|
|
|
$
|
32,531
|
|
|
$
|
25,836
|
|
Baywinde
|
|
$
|
35,977
|
|
|
$
|
35,926
|
|
|
$
|
33,528
|
|
|
$
|
31,308
|
|
|
$
|
5,152
|
|
Walden Place
|
|
$
|
42,449
|
|
|
$
|
40,071
|
|
|
$
|
35,674
|
|
|
$
|
33,313
|
|
|
$
|
5,312
|
|
Chancellors Village
|
|
$
|
29,526
|
|
|
$
|
29,698
|
|
|
$
|
29,274
|
|
|
$
|
27,693
|
|
|
$
|
3,957
|
|
Mangrove Bay
|
|
$
|
57,873
|
|
|
$
|
56,944
|
|
|
$
|
58,261
|
|
|
$
|
56,645
|
|
|
$
|
54,246
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Rent payable by residents is paid to the facility operator
while the facility operator is also responsible for paying the
expenses of the operations which support the rent paid by the
residents. Under a net lease structure, the facility operator
retains the net of the revenue and operating expenses after
paying the lease payment to the owner of the property. Under a
TRS structure, the facility operator is paid a management fee
and the net of the revenue and operating expenses after paying
the management fee would be retained by the TRS lessee whereby
the TRS lessee would remit the lease payment required under its
lease to the owner of the property.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Revenues per available unit for 2006 and partial year 2005
are derived from unaudited financial statements.
|
|
(3)
|
|
For the partial year ended 2005, the revenues per available
unit shown are for partial year ownership based on the date the
applicable facility was acquired by the current owner, as
follows: Lake Barrington Woods and Bella Terra (March 4,
2005 to December 31, 2005); Baywinde and Walden Place
(October 31, 2005 to December 31, 2005); and
Chancellors Village (November 18, 2005 to
December 31, 2005).
|
The purchase and sale agreement that we have entered into to
acquire these six senior housing facilities contains various
customary conditions to closing. There can be no assurances that
all of these conditions will be satisfied or waived and that we
will be able to complete the acquisition of these facilities on
the terms described herein or at all.
The agreement provided for a
30-day
due
diligence period, which has expired. We have completed our due
diligence investigation of the facilities that we have under
contract.
87
Business
The agreement requires us to deposit a total of
$20.5 million in escrow. Mr. Hutchison paid the
initial deposit in the amount of $100,000 and the second deposit
in the amount of $400,000 on our behalf. We will reimburse
Mr. Hutchison for these deposits. We are required to
deposit $20.0 million in escrow within one business day
after completion of this offering, $5.0 million of which
will be non-refundable if we do not complete the purchase of
these facilities, other than as a result of the failure of the
sellers to meet certain closing conditions.
Upon completion of the acquisition, we will own each of the
facilities that we currently have under contract in fee simple,
other than the Walden Place facility, where we will acquire a
ground lease interest with an option to buy the fee interest in
the facility for a nominal purchase price upon expiration of the
ground lease in 2011.
As further described in Material Federal Income Tax
Considerations, following completion of this offering and
our receipt of the private letter ruling from the IRS that we
intend to request confirming our ability to lease the facilities
we have under contract to our TRS lessee, and the regulatory
approvals required to transfer the operating licenses for these
facilities to our TRS lessee, we intend to lease these
facilities to our TRS lessee.
Pending receipt of these approvals and upon completion of the
acquisition of the six senior housing facilities we have under
contract:
|
|
Ø
|
We will enter into new leases for Lake Barrington Woods, Bella
Terra, BaywindeCastle Pointe, Chancellors Village
and Mangrove Bay with affiliates of Senior Lifestyle Management,
LLC, or Senior Lifestyle Management, the management company that
currently operates the six facilities we have under contract.
Each of these new leases will have a term that expires on
January 31, 2012, with a possible extension for a period
not to exceed 18 months.
|
|
Ø
|
Until the necessary regulatory approvals to transfer the
operating licenses from the current facility operators to
affiliates of Senior Lifestyle Management are obtained from the
New York State Department of Health, affiliates of Senior
Lifestyle Management will continue to lease the New York
assisted living facilities from us pursuant to the existing
leases which have terms that expire on June 18, 2013
without renewal options. The New York assisted living facilities
are subleased by the affiliates of Senior Lifestyle Management
to the current facility operators who are not affiliated with
Senior Lifestyle Management. Upon the receipt of regulatory
approvals to transfer the operating licenses from the subtenants
to affiliates of Senior Lifestyle Management, we will terminate
the subleases and we will amend and restate the existing leases
for the New York assisted living facilities. The amended and
restated leases will be similar to the new leases for the other
facilities we have under contract.
|
We refer to the affiliates of Senior Lifestyle Management that
will lease Lake Barrington Woods, Bella Terra,
BaywindeCastle Pointe, Chancellors Village and
Mangrove Bay and the New York assisted living facilities as
tenants, except in the case where we implement the TRS lessee
structure, in which case the TRS lessee will be the tenant.
We will have the right to terminate the new leases with respect
to the six senior housing facilities we have under contract at
any time upon 30 days prior written notice, and the
existing leases at any time, without penalty. The tenants will
be required to pay us aggregate fixed rent under the new and
existing leases at an annual rate of approximately
$16.3 million in 2010, $18.5 million in 2011,
$20.7 million in 2012 and $21.0 million in 2013.
The tenants at the facilities, other than the New York assisted
living facilities, will enter into new management agreements
with Senior Lifestyle Management. Senior Lifestyle Management
will continue to operate the New York assisted living facilities
pursuant to existing management agreements with the current
facility operators who are not affiliated with Senior Lifestyle
Management. Once the regulatory approvals required to transfer
the operating licenses from the current facility operators to
affiliates of
88
Business
Senior Lifestyle Management are obtained from the New York State
Department of Health, the existing management agreements will be
terminated and the tenants at the New York assisted living
facilities will enter into new management agreements with Senior
Lifestyle Management. We will not be a party to any of these
management agreements, and, therefore, we will not be
responsible for any payments under these management agreements,
until such time as the management agreements are assigned to our
TRS lessee as described below.
The new management agreements for the facilities other than the
New York assisted living facilities will each have a term of
20 years. The new management agreements for the two New
York assisted living facilities will each have an initial term
of five years, and Senior Lifestyle Management will have the
right to extend the agreements for three additional five-year
terms. Under the new management agreements, the tenants will be
required to pay Senior Lifestyle Management a base management
fee ranging from 2.0% to 4.0% of the gross revenue generated at
the facilities (subject to a reduction if Senior Lifestyle
Management fails to meet certain performance targets in an
amount not to exceed $275,000 in the aggregate), as well as a
tiered incentive fee of up to an additional 15.0% of annual net
operating income of the facilities on a combined basis, to the
extent it exceeds certain thresholds. Senior Lifestyle
Management will be entitled to receive an additional incentive
payment from the tenant upon a sale of the applicable facility
equal to 15.0% of any profits we earn on the sale in excess of a
12.0% unleveraged internal rate of return on our cumulative
investment basis as it relates to such facility or facilities.
During the term of the new management agreements, each tenant
has the right to terminate the agreement, at any time, without
paying a termination fee to Senior Lifestyle Management if there
has been an event of default or if Senior Lifestyle Management
does not meet or exceed certain baseline performance targets
based on the portfolios and the facilitys annual net
operating income. An event of default occurs under each new
management agreement if: (1) Senior Lifestyle Management
files a bankruptcy petition, makes an assignment for the benefit
of its creditors or has a bankruptcy petition filed against it
that is not discharged within 60 days; (2) the permits
required to operate the facility are suspended, terminated or
revoked; (3) Senior Lifestyle Management fails to maintain
the facility in material compliance with applicable laws or the
facility is closed; (4) Senior Lifestyle Management fails
to comply with its obligations under the agreement following
receipt of written notice of the default and the opportunity to
cure the default; or (5) Senior Lifestyle Management
breaches any of the representations and warranties contained in
the agreement. Additionally, each tenant has the right to
terminate the new management agreement with Senior Lifestyle
Management if, at any time, the applicable facility is sold and
the tenant pays Senior Lifestyle Management a termination fee
equal to an amount ranging from 3.5x to 1.0x the trailing
12 months of base management fees actually paid to Senior
Lifestyle Management depending on when the facility is sold.
Beginning in 2014 and anytime thereafter, each tenant has the
right to terminate the new management agreement if Senior
Lifestyle Management fails to meet performance targets (set at
levels that are higher than the baseline performance targets)
and the tenant pays Senior Lifestyle Management a termination
fee equal to 3.5x the base management fees actually paid to
Senior Lifestyle Management over the trailing 12-month period
prior to termination.
If we are successful in obtaining a private letter ruling from
the IRS that allows us to lease the facilities to a TRS lessee
and the regulatory approvals necessary to transfer the operating
licenses from the facility operators to our TRS lessee, the
tenants will assign the new management agreements to our TRS
lessee and our TRS lessee will assume the new tenants
obligations under each management agreement.
If the IRS does not confirm our ability to use a TRS lessee for
certain of these facilities, we will either lease the units at
the facilities directly to the residents and use a TRS to
provide services to the residents or net lease the facilities to
affiliates of Senior Lifestyle Management under a long-term net
leases that provide for the payment of base rent subject to
annual escalators as well as additional percentage rent based on
gross revenues.
89
Business
The pro forma financial information included elsewhere in this
prospectus reflects the expected rental revenue to be received
pursuant to the terms of the new leases for Lake Barrington
Woods, Bella Terra, Baywinde-Castle Pointe, Chancellors
Village and Mangrove Bay and the existing leases for the
New York assisted living facilities and does not reflect
the TRS lessee structure that we expect to put in place upon
receipt of the private letter ruling and regulatory approvals.
For additional information regarding the potential impact to our
revenues of the implementation of the TRS lessee structure, see
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of OperationsOverview.
Pipeline
Our management team is actively reviewing and discussing
potential off-market acquisition opportunities, substantially
all of which have been sourced through its long-standing
relationships in the senior housing and real estate industries.
In addition to our initial portfolio, as of the date of this
prospectus, we have executed one non-binding letter of intent to
negotiate acquisition terms for a high quality, income-producing
assisted living facility containing over 100 units with an
estimated value in excess of $18 million. In addition, we
previously executed letters of intent on 15 additional
properties. These previous letters of intent have expired or
been terminated. We expect to reinstate letters of intent on
several of these properties following completion of this
offering, although there is no assurance that we will be
successful in doing so. These previous letters of intent, four
of which were terminated on September 30, 2010, include a
portfolio of 13 senior housing facilities and a portfolio of two
senior housing facilities, which in the aggregate contain
approximately 1,300 units consisting of predominantly
assisted living units and representing a potential purchase
value in excess of $300 million.
All of these properties derive substantially all of their
revenues from private payment sources. The letter of intent
related to the single senior housing facility gives us the
exclusive right to negotiate purchase terms with the potential
seller until October 28, 2010. We believe that the purchase
terms for some of these potential acquisitions would include
phased closings or purchase options, the timing of which could
be impacted by the transfer of operating licenses and other
regulatory matters or general market conditions. The valuation
measurement we are targeting for these potential acquisitions
reflects a capitalization rate range of between 7.5% and 8.5%.
In addition to the potential acquisitions described above, we
are currently reviewing other potential acquisition
opportunities which include over 2,000 units. These other
opportunities consist of high quality, income-producing
independent and assisted living facilities that derive
substantially all of their revenues from private payment sources.
We have not entered into any binding agreements with respect to
any of the facilities in our pipeline, including the facility we
have under a non-binding letter of intent, and there can be no
assurance that we will reinstate any previous letter of intent
or enter into binding purchase contracts to acquire any of these
facilities or that we will acquire any of these facilities.
INVESTMENT
STRATEGY
Our objective is to maximize total returns to our stockholders
through the payment of consistent cash distributions and the
achievement of long-term capital appreciation in our properties.
We intend to achieve this objective by utilizing our management
teams substantial experience and extensive network of
long-standing relationships in the senior housing and real
estate industries to acquire senior housing facilities that
generate substantially all of their revenues from private
payment sources. We will target facilities that occupy a
market-leading position within their local markets and that are
located in and around metropolitan areas with strong demographic
profiles, as well as in destination retirement areas such as
California, Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina and Texas.
Typically, our facilities will be
90
Business
managed by or leased to experienced facility operators that we
believe have track records of achieving growth and profitability
in the facilities they operate.
The senior housing facilities we intend to acquire generally
will have apartment or bedroom accommodations, dining services,
emergency call systems, concierge support and activity programs,
transportation and, as the level of medical and health care
services offered to residents of a particular facility, or the
acuity level, increases, various levels of personal and medical
support services. Our senior housing facilities will generally
have lower acuity levels and will focus primarily on providing
residential housing and need-driven services focused on
assistance with activities of daily living.
Our primary focus will be on identifying and acquiring the
following facilities:
|
|
Ø
|
Independent living facilities.
Independent
living facilities are age-restricted multifamily rental
properties with central dining facilities that provide
residents, as part of their monthly fee, access to meals and
other services such as housekeeping, linen service,
transportation and social and recreational activities. These
facilities do not provide, in a majority of the units,
assistance with activities of daily living such as supervision
of medication, bathing, dressing, eating, ambulating and
toileting. There are no licensed skilled nursing beds in these
facilities. Revenues generated by these facilities are
predominantly private payment sources.
|
|
Ø
|
Assisted living facilities.
Assisted living
facilities are state-regulated rental properties that provide
the same services as independent living facilities, but also
provide, in a majority of the units, supportive care from
trained employees to residents who are unable to live
independently and require assistance with activities of daily
living. Assisted living facilities may have some licensed
nursing beds, but the majority of the units are licensed for
assisted living. Assisted living facilities may have wings or
floors dedicated to residents with Alzheimers disease or
other forms of dementia. We consider a facility that specializes
in the care of residents with Alzheimers disease and other
forms of dementia and that is not licensed as a skilled nursing
facility to be an assisted living facility.
|
|
Ø
|
Freestanding Alzheimers/dementia care
facilities.
Freestanding
Alzheimers/dementia care facilities are assisted living
facilities that provide, in a majority of units, assistance with
activities of daily living to residents suffering from
Alzheimers disease and other forms of dementia in a secure
environment. These facilities may provide dementia specific
programming, assistance, supervision and care giving in addition
to services typically offered at assisted living facilities.
|
|
Ø
|
Continuing care retirement
communities.
Continuing care retirement
communities are age-restricted senior housing facilities that
include a combination of independent living, assisted living and
skilled nursing services (or independent living and skilled
nursing services) available to residents all on one campus.
Resident payment plans vary and may include entrance fees and
condo/co-op and rental programs. The majority of the units in
these types of facilities are not licensed nursing beds.
|
While not a primary focus of our strategy, we may also
opportunistically acquire from time to time additional types of
senior housing facilities, including but not limited to:
|
|
Ø
|
Senior apartments.
Senior apartments are
multifamily residential rental properties restricted to adults
at least 55 years of age or older. These properties do not
have central kitchen facilities and generally do not provide
meals to residents, but may offer community rooms, social
activities, and other amenities.
|
|
Ø
|
Skilled nursing facilities.
Skilled nursing
facilities are licensed daily rate or rental facilities where
the majority of individuals require
24-hour
nursing
and/or
medical care. In most cases, these facilities are licensed for
Medicaid
and/or
Medicare reimbursement. These facilities may include a minority
of assisted living units, including Alzheimers/dementia
care units.
|
91
Business
OUR GROWTH
STRATEGIES
Our objective is to maximize total returns to our stockholders
through the payment of consistent cash distributions and the
achievement of long-term capital appreciation in our properties
through the pursuit of the following growth strategies:
|
|
Ø
|
Capitalize on network of relationships to pursue off-market
transactions.
We plan to pursue off-market
transactions in our target markets through the long-standing
relationships our management team has developed over the past
20 years. We believe these relationships will be a
significant source of senior housing acquisition opportunities.
The senior housing facilities that we currently have under
contract were sourced off-market through a relationship
developed by our management team.
|
|
Ø
|
Utilize creative and flexible transaction structures to
participate in operating improvements.
We intend
to capitalize on our management teams prior experience in
utilizing creative and flexible acquisition, management and
lease structures that allow senior housing REITs to capture
potential growth in facility-level cash flows. We believe that,
as the overall economy recovers, residential real estate values
stabilize and consumer confidence is restored, many seniors will
respond to deferred health care and social needs and choose to
sell their homes and move into senior housing facilities. We
also believe minimal new supply will be added to the inventory
of available senior housing units through the near term. We
believe that, as demographic trends cause demand to increase,
occupancy and pricing power will accelerate, thereby improving
operating profitability.
|
|
Ø
|
Maximize value through active asset
management.
Based on our management teams
prior experience, we expect to allocate a significant portion of
our staffing resources to asset management based on an active
ownership philosophy that engages our facility operators in a
cooperative relationship. Although we do not intend to operate
our senior housing facilities directly, we will actively
participate with our facility operators in various aspects of
the operations of our facilities, including positioning and
repositioning, operations analysis, physical design, renovation,
capital improvements, resident experience and overall strategic
direction.
|
OUR ACQUISITION
PROCESS
Our acquisition process will utilize extensive research to
evaluate a target market and facility, including a detailed
review of the long-term economic outlook, trends in local demand
generators, competitive environment, property systems and
physical condition, capabilities of the facility operator, and
facility financial performance. We intend to implement a
disciplined acquisition and asset management process that
involves significant attention from our senior management team
at all stages of the acquisition process.
Our acquisition process is outlined below:
|
|
Ø
|
Origination and screening.
We expect to
identify investment opportunities through our management
teams network of long-standing relationships in the senior
housing and real estate industries. Only if the targeted
facility, market and operator meet our investment criteria will
we proceed to the next step of our acquisition process.
|
|
Ø
|
Initial due diligence, investment analysis and site
inspections
. Once we identify a prospective acquisition, we
will employ detailed financial modeling and analysis of the
facility. In connection with our acquisitions, we intend to
focus on the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
the expertise and reputation of the facility operator that will
operate the facility;
|
|
|
-
|
the geographic area, type of facility and demographic profile;
|
|
|
-
|
the market position and competitive landscape of the facility,
including occupancy and demand for similar facilities in the
same or nearby communities;
|
92
Business
|
|
|
|
-
|
the location, construction quality, condition and design of the
facility;
|
|
|
-
|
the current and anticipated earnings and cash flows, their
adequacy to meet lease obligations, service facility level
indebtedness, if any, and other operational needs, including
capital expenditures, and risks to such earnings and cash flows;
|
|
|
-
|
whether the anticipated rent provides a competitive market
return to us;
|
|
|
-
|
the potential for capital appreciation;
|
|
|
-
|
the federal income tax laws applicable to REITs;
|
|
|
-
|
the regulatory and reimbursement environment in which the
facility operates; and
|
|
|
-
|
the proportion of private-pay residents, with an emphasis on
little or no Medicare or Medicaid reimbursements.
|
|
|
Ø
|
Investment committee.
Our investment committee
will be composed of key members of our management team. The
initial members of the committee will be Messrs. Hutchison,
Anderson and Patten. Upon completion of our initial due
diligence, investment analysis and site inspection, our
investment committee will evaluate the acquisition opportunity
and determine whether to present the potential investment to our
board of directors for their consideration and approval. In this
presentation, our analysis will provide an in-depth overview of
the facility, due diligence conducted, key financial metrics and
analyses related to the facility and the market in which it is
located, as well as investment considerations and potential
factors mitigating risk. We will not acquire any assets or make
any investments without investment committee approval.
|
|
Ø
|
Confirmatory due diligence process.
We will
work with outside legal counsel to complete legal due diligence,
including title, insurance and regulatory review, and document
each acquisition. We expect to engage third party advisors
and/or
consultants to conduct various physical inspections. We will not
proceed with any acquisition opportunity unless the results of
these reviews are satisfactory to us.
|
|
Ø
|
Final investment approval.
Upon completion of
our confirmatory due diligence and a favorable decision by our
investment committee to proceed with an investment, our board of
directors will have approval rights over acquisitions exceeding
thresholds that it will identify. All other acquisitions will be
at the investment committees discretion. For acquisitions
requiring approval by our board of directors, once approval is
received, we will proceed with closing the acquisition. We
expect that we will not put any nonrefundable deposit money at
risk until we have received final approval from our board of
directors, if approval is required.
|
|
Ø
|
Asset management.
After closing an
acquisition, we intend to actively asset manage the acquired
facility. We intend to employ a dedicated and experienced asset
management team to proactively manage our facility operators in
order to improve operational performance and enhance total
returns on our investments. We believe active asset management
represents a substantial competitive advantage compared to many
other companies in our industry and creates stockholder value.
Although we do not intend to directly operate our senior housing
facilities, our management team and the asset managers we intend
to employ will actively participate with our facility operators
in various aspects of the operations of our facilities,
including property positioning and repositioning, operations
analysis, physical design, renovation, capital improvements,
resident experience and overall strategic direction.
|
93
Business
GOVERNMENTAL
REGULATION
General
We anticipate that most of our senior housing facilities will
derive their revenues from private payment sources and not from
government reimbursement programs such as Medicare and Medicaid.
Independent living facilities and assisted living facilities are
generally subject to less governmental regulation than skilled
nursing facilities, which do receive payment from governmental
sources, including Medicare and Medicaid. The Medicare program
was enacted in 1965 to provide a nationwide, federally funded
health insurance program for the elderly and certain disabled
persons. The Medicaid program is a joint federal/state
cooperative arrangement established for the purpose of enabling
states to furnish medical assistance on behalf of aged, blind or
disabled individuals, and members of families with dependent
children, whose income and resources are insufficient to meet
the costs of necessary medical services. Within the Medicare and
Medicaid statutory framework, there are substantial areas
subject to administrative regulations and rulings,
interpretation and discretion that may affect payments made to
providers under these programs. The amounts of program payments
received by our facility operators can be changed by legislative
or regulatory actions and by determinations made by fiscal
intermediaries and other payment agents acting on behalf of the
programs.
Licensure
Senior housing facilities are subject to extensive state and
local laws and regulations relating to licensure, conduct of
operations and services provided within the properties. Health
care operations are subject to regulation and licensing by state
and local health and social services agencies and other
regulatory authorities. In order to maintain operating licenses,
facility operators must comply with standards concerning medical
care, equipment, and hygiene. Although regulatory requirements
vary from state to state, these requirements generally address
among other things: personnel education and training; staffing
levels; patient records; facility services; quality of care
provided; physical residence specifications; food and
housekeeping services; and residents rights and
responsibilities. Senior housing facilities are subject to
periodic survey and inspection by governmental authorities.
Senior housing facilities are also subject to various state and
local building codes and other ordinances, including zoning,
fire, food service and safety codes. The licensure requirements
may apply to our TRS lessee.
Medicare and
Medicaid overview
Our strategy is to identify and acquire independent living
facilities, assisted living facilities, which may include
Alzheimers/dementia care units or free-standing
Alzheimers/dementia care facilities, and continuing care
retirement communities, that generate substantially all of their
revenues from private payment sources. While not a primary focus
of our strategy, we may also opportunistically acquire other
types of senior housing facilities, including but not limited to
senior apartments and skilled nursing facilities.
Skilled nursing services are reimbursable by both Medicare and
Medicaid. Medicare is a federally funded program that provides
certain health care benefits to persons aged 65 and over, some
disabled persons and persons who qualify for the end-stage renal
disease program. Medicare is administered by the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, and consists of four
parts: Parts A, B, C, and D.
Medicaid is a medical assistance program for low-income
individuals. Medicaid is jointly funded by the federal and state
governments, but is administered by individual states operating
within federal guidelines. The federal government sets broad
national guidelines to qualify for federal funding, under which
states establish their own eligibility standards, determine the
type, amount, duration and scope of services, set the rate of
payment for such services and administer their own programs.
Because of this structure, Medicaid programs vary considerably
from state to state, as well as within each state over
94
Business
time. The federal government pays a share of the medical
assistance expenditures under each states Medicaid
program. That share, known as the Federal Medical Assistance
Percentage, is determined annually by a formula that compares a
states average per capital income level with the national
income average. A state with a higher per capital income level
is reimbursed for a smaller share of its costs, but in all cases
the federal share is at least 50%.
Americans with
Disabilities Act
Our facilities must comply with the ADA and any similar state or
local laws to the extent that such facilities are public
accommodations as defined in those statutes. The ADA may
require removal of barriers to access by persons with
disabilities in certain public areas of our facilities where
such removal is readily achievable. Should barriers to access by
persons with disabilities be discovered at any of our
facilities, we may be directly or indirectly responsible for
additional costs that may be required to make facilities
ADA-compliant. Noncompliance with the ADA could result in the
imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants.
The obligation to make readily achievable accommodations
pursuant to the ADA is an ongoing one, and we continue to assess
our facilities and make modifications as appropriate in this
respect.
Recent
developments
Health care, including the long-term care and assisted living
sectors, remains a dynamic, evolving industry. On March 23,
2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 was
enacted and on March 30, the Health Care and Education
Reconciliation Act was enacted, which in part modified the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Together, the two
Acts represent a significant overhaul of the healthcare system
in the United States. The two Acts are intended to reduce the
number of individuals in the United States without health
insurance and effect significant other changes to the ways in
which health care is organized, delivered and reimbursed. The
legislation will become effective in a phased approach,
beginning in 2010 and concluding in 2018. At this time, the
effects of these two Acts and their impact on our business are
not yet known. Our business, results of operations and ability
to pay cash distributions to our stockholders could be
materially and adversely effected by the two Acts and further
governmental initiatives undertaken pursuant to the two Acts.
COMPETITION
We expect to compete for investment opportunities with
institutional investors, private equity investors, other REITs
and numerous local, regional and national owners, in each of our
target markets. Some of these entities may have substantially
greater financial resources than we do and may be able and
willing to accept more risk than we can prudently manage.
Competition generally may increase the bargaining power of
property owners seeking to sell and reduce the number of
suitable investment opportunities offered to us or purchased by
us.
The senior housing industry is highly competitive. Senior
housing facilities we acquire will compete with other properties
for residents in our markets. In addition, we must compete
against home health care and other in home services which may
allow residents to extend their stay in their apartment or home.
Competitive factors include location, convenience, brand
affiliation, rates, range of services, facilities and amenities
or accommodations offered and quality of service. Competition in
the markets in which our facilities will operate will include
competition from existing, newly renovated and newly developed
senior housing facilities. Competition can adversely affect the
occupancy and rates of our facilities, and thus our financial
results, and may require us to provide additional amenities,
incur additional costs or make capital improvements that we
otherwise might not choose to make, which may adversely affect
our profitability.
95
Business
ENVIRONMENTAL
MATTERS
The senior housing facilities that we acquire will be subject to
various federal, state and local environmental laws. Under these
laws, courts and government agencies have the authority to
require us, as owner or operator of a contaminated property, to
clean up the property, even if we did not know of or were not
responsible for the release of the contamination. These laws
also apply to persons who owned or operated a property at the
time that it became contaminated, and therefore it is possible
that we could incur these costs even after we sell some of the
properties we acquire. In addition to the costs of cleanup,
environmental contamination can affect the value of a property
and, therefore, an owners ability to borrow funds using
the property as collateral or to sell the property. Under the
environmental laws, courts and government agencies also have the
authority to require that a person who sent waste to a waste
disposal facility, such as a landfill or an incinerator, pay for
the
clean-up
of that facility if it becomes contaminated and threatens human
health or the environment.
Furthermore, various court decisions have established that third
parties may recover damages for personal injury, as well as for
damage to property and to natural resources caused by property
contamination. For instance, a person exposed to asbestos while
staying in a senior housing facility may seek to recover damages
if he or she suffers personal injury from the asbestos. Lastly,
some of these environmental laws restrict the use of a property
or place conditions on various activities. An example would be
laws that require a business using chemicals (such as swimming
pool treatment chemicals at a senior housing facility) to manage
them carefully and to notify local officials that the chemicals
are being used.
We could be responsible for any of the costs discussed above.
The costs to clean up a contaminated property, to defend against
a claim, to satisfy a judgment or pay a penalty, or to comply
with environmental laws could be material and could adversely
affect the funds available for distribution to our stockholders.
We have obtained a Phase I environmental site assessment
for each of the six senior housing facilities that we have under
contract and expect to obtain Phase I environmental site
assessments for facilities we acquire in the future. Based on
these Phase I environmental site assessments and the
sellers representations in the purchase and sale agreement
related to the six senior housing facilities we have under
contract, we are not aware of any material environmental
liabilities related to these facilities. However, these
environmental site assessments may not reveal all environmental
costs that might have a material adverse effect on our business,
assets, results of operations or liquidity and may not identify
all potential environmental liabilities. For example, the
Phase I environmental site assessments did not include a
comprehensive mold investigation.
As a result, we may become subject to material environmental
liabilities. We can make no assurances that (1) future laws
or regulations will not impose material environmental
liabilities on us, or (2) the environmental condition of
our senior housing facilities will not be affected by the
condition of the properties in the vicinity of our senior
housing facilities (such as the presence of leaking underground
storage tanks on an adjacent up-gradient property) or by third
parties unrelated to us.
EMPLOYEES
As of the date of this prospectus, we had five full-time
officers, but no employees since we are in our organizational
stage.
INSURANCE
We will maintain
and/or
require in our leases and other agreements that our facility
operators maintain all applicable lines of insurance on our
facilities and their operations. We will be required to maintain
casualty insurance for the senior housing facilities that we
lease to our TRS lessee. Our facility operators will be required
pursuant to management agreements to maintain general and
professional liability insurance covering the facilities leased
to our TRS lessee and to operate these facilities in
96
Business
accordance with the standards contained in the management
agreements. The costs of the insurance program covering the
senior housing facilities that may be leased to our TRS lessee
will be facility expenses paid from the revenues of these
facilities, regardless of who maintains the insurance.
The amount and scope of insurance coverage provided by the
policies we maintain and the policies maintained by our facility
operators will be customary for similarly situated companies in
our industry. We believe the amount of insurance coverage we
will have on the six initial facilities in our portfolio is
adequate. We cannot assure you that in the future insurance will
be available at a reasonable cost or that we, our facility
operators will be able to maintain adequate levels of insurance
coverage. In addition, we cannot give any assurances as to the
future financial viability of our insurers or that the insurance
coverage provided will fully cover all losses on our facilities
upon the occurrence of a catastrophic event.
Due to historically high frequency and severity of professional
liability claims against health care providers, the availability
of professional liability insurance has been restricted and the
premiums for such coverage remain very high. In addition, many
health care providers are pursuing different organizational and
corporate structures coupled with self-insurance programs that
provide less insurance coverage. As a result, our facility
operators could incur large funded and unfunded professional
liability expense, which could have a material adverse effect on
their liquidity, financial condition and results of operations,
and which, in turn, could affect adversely their ability to make
rental payments under, or otherwise comply with the terms of,
their leases or other agreements with us or, with regard to our
facilities leased to our TRS lessee, adversely affect our
results of operations. We cannot assure you that our facility
operators will carry the insurance coverage required under the
terms of their leases and other agreements with us or that we
will require the same levels of insurance under those leases and
agreements.
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
We are not involved in any material litigation nor is any
material litigation threatened against us.
97
Market opportunity
and industry overview
OVERVIEW
We believe the weakened economy combined with the current
capital constrained environment presents a compelling
opportunity for well-capitalized companies to acquire high
quality private-pay senior housing facilities at attractive
prices. We believe many owners of senior housing facilities will
encounter challenges in refinancing or repaying upcoming debt
maturities, particularly for those senior housing facilities
acquired at peak-market prices with high loan-to-value ratios
during the period from 2003 to 2007. Lower facility-level cash
flows in conjunction with more conservative lending practices
will lead over-leveraged senior housing owners, operators and
investors to sell senior housing facilities at attractive
prices. We also expect liquidity constraints faced by financial
buyers, including investment managers of limited life funds,
will cause these non-operating owners to sell income-producing
senior housing facilities to provide liquidity to their
investors. Finally, we believe that sale lease back transactions
may be appealing to select senior housing operators who prefer
to deploy available capital into operations and away from real
estate ownership.
We believe that investors will face relatively less competition
in the senior housing market compared to other commercial real
estate sectors since generalist real estate investors have
refocused on distressed markets and core real estate asset
classes. We also believe the fragmented nature of health care
real estate and the specialized expertise needed to underwrite
these assets will restrain demand for senior housing facilities.
Our extensive relationships with leading senior housing owners,
operators, developers and investors and our growth-oriented
capital structure are expected to give us a competitive
advantage in acquiring these assets.
We expect to benefit from a rebound in facility-level cash
flows, which will improve our investment yields and enhance our
total returns to stockholders. Deterioration in the residential
real estate market, including declines in median home sale
prices, and weakened consumer confidence have contributed to
lower occupancy rates in the senior housing industry as many
seniors have deferred the decision to sell their homes and
relocate to senior housing facilities. We believe that this
trend will reverse course as economic conditions improve,
residential real estate values stabilize, and consumer
confidence rises. We also believe owners of senior housing
facilities will continue to benefit from favorable demographics,
including growth in the total U.S. population age 65
and older and limited growth in new supply of senior housing
facilities as a result of the current capital constrained
environment.
Certain industry data discussed below is derived from third
party sources that require the payment of subscription or
membership fees. We pay a quarterly subscription fee of $7,500
to the NIC
MAP
®
Data & Analysis service, an annual membership fee of
$495 for our NIC Executive Circle membership, and fees ranging
from $150 to $195 to the American Seniors Housing Association,
or ASHA, for the Seniors Housing Statistical Handbook, The State
of Seniors Housing 2009 Report and the Seniors Housing
Construction Trends Report.
SIGNIFICANT AND
GROWING SEGMENT OF THE HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY
The health care industry is the single largest sector of the
U.S. economy, generating over $2.3 trillion of expenditures
in 2008 and a projected $2.4 trillion in expenditures in 2009
according to a National Health Expenditures report released in
January 2010 by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
The United States Department of Health and Human Services has
projected steady growth of health care needs for aging
Americans. The number of Americans age 65 and older is
expected to grow significantly in aggregate numbers and as a
relative percentage of the total U.S. population. For
example, the United States Census Bureau, as illustrated in the
table below, projects that the segment of the
U.S. population age 65 and older will grow from a
combined 40.2 million in 2010 (13.0% of the total
population), to 54.8 million in 2020 (16.1% of the total
population) and to more than 72.0 million Americans
age 65 and older by 2030 (19.3% of the total population).
98
Market
opportunity and industry overview
Population
(Historical and Projected)
Source: United States Census
Bureau
OCCUPANCY
REVERSION TO HISTORICAL MEAN
As shown in the table below, independent and assisted living
occupancy rates have fallen in recent periods. We believe that
current declines in occupancy are primarily a result of delayed
transitions by seniors to senior housing facilities because of
the recent economic recession and downturn in the residential
real estate market in the United States. The decline in demand
for senior housing among seniors and the resulting decline in
occupancy rates and revenues within the senior housing industry,
particularly in independent living facilities and continuing
care retirement communities, has given buyers opportunities to
acquire facilities with prospects for strong internal growth as
the residential real estate market stabilizes and seniors gain
the confidence to relocate.
Occupancy
Trends
Source: NIC
MAP
®
Data & Analysis Service, American Senior Housing
Association 2009 State of Seniors Housing
99
Market
opportunity and industry overview
Recent data suggest some improvement in the single family home
resale market. According to the National Association of
Realtors, the supply of homes on the market available for resale
peaked in July 2008 at 11.2 months supply compared to
7.8 months supply in January 2010. In addition,
measures of consumer confidence continue to improve from recent
lows as shown in the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment
index below.
Consumer
Sentiment
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of
St. Louis
Assisted living occupancies are correlated with economic
conditions such as employment, as demonstrated in the chart
below. Assisted living average occupancy has declined with job
growth since the onset of the U.S. economic recession in
the fourth quarter of 2007. The ASHA 2009 State of Seniors
Housing indicates stabilized assisted living properties have
exhibited long-term average occupancy of 92.9% from 1994 to
2007. We believe assisted living occupancies will revert to
historic averages based on growing demographic demand and
need-based health care demands of aging seniors. Additionally,
we believe a general economic recovery will positively impact
consumer sentiment and add velocity to seniors waiting to
transition to age or service appropriate senior housing options.
Furthermore, we believe that the majority of seniors that move
into the types of retirement communities that we target are
likely to own their homes free and clear from mortgages or
subject to mortgages that have been substantially paid down.
While those residents may be subject to constraints on
saleability of their homes based on market conditions for home
sales, their decision to sell is not typically constrained by
problems associated with having mortgage balances that exceed
the market value of their homes. For example, ASHA reports in
the Spring 2008 Statistical Survey of Senior Homeowners that 74%
of the respondents own their homes free and clear.
100
Market
opportunity and industry overview
Assisted
Living Occupancy & Employment
Source: NIC
MAP
®
Data & Analysis Service, United States Bureau of Labor
Statistics
Independent living occupancies are related to economic
conditions such as GDP growth as demonstrated in the table
below. The ASHA 2009 State of Seniors Housing indicates
stabilized independent living properties have exhibited
long-term average occupancy of 94.4% from 1994 to 2007.
Independent
Living Occupancy & GDP
Source: NIC
MAP
®
Data & Analysis Service, United States Department of
Commerce - Bureau of Economic Analysis
Independent living occupancies are tied to the residential real
estate market as illustrated in the chart below. Based on our
prior experience, we believe as an economic recovery develops
and residential real estate values stabilize seniors will more
readily accept paper losses on their home asset values and
transition to senior housing options.
101
Market
opportunity and industry overview
Independent
Living Occupancy & Months Supply of Homes for
Sale
Source: NIC
MAP
®
Data & Analysis Service, National Association of
Realtors
SEVERELY LIMITED
SUPPLY GROWTH
Supply fundamentals have been an important factor in previous
senior housing cycles, notably supply overhang due to
overbuilding in the late 1990s, which produced a sustained
period of lower supply growth that increased net absorption and
contributed to significant sustained rate increases within the
sector. As shown in the chart below, new supply growth as a
percentage of existing inventory has been trending at a historic
low since 2000. Construction starts and new unit delivery
reductions will cause industry supply growth to trend from an
estimated 1.7% in 2008 to an estimated 1.3% for 2009,
significantly below the historical average supply growth rate of
4.8% from 1985 to 2009 (ASHA/NIC Senior Housing Construction
Trends Report 2009). We believe capital market dislocations, a
scarcity of development capital and continued challenging credit
market conditions will restrain supply growth in the near term.
Supply &
75+ Population Growth
Source: NIC
MAP
®
Data & Analysis Service, ASHA 2009 Seniors Housing
Construction Trends Report, United States Census
Bureau
102
Market
opportunity and industry overview
INDEPENDENT
LIVING AND ASSISTED LIVING SECTORS SHOW CONSISTENT
GROWTH
As shown in the chart below, the independent living and assisted
living sectors, in which we intend to focus our investments,
have sustained rate growth increases over the last
15 years, with average annual rate growth of 4.3%. Within
the four-year period of 1994 to 1998 following the
1990-1991
recession, the senior housing industry achieved a blended
average annual rate growth of 4.0%. A similar trend followed the
2001-2002
downturn, when the senior housing industry experienced average
annual rate growth of 4.5% in 2003 and 2004. Despite the onset
of the economic recession from 2007 through 2009, senior housing
averaged greater than a 2.0% rate growth. We believe that the
recent decline in median senior housing occupancies will allow
us to acquire assets at attractive valuations and that increases
in market rates and occupancy are likely to follow as property
performance reverts to the blended historic median occupancies
of 93.5% (according to the ASHA 2009 State of Senior Housing)
and median rate increases of 4.3%.
Annual
Rate Growth
Source: NIC
MAP
®
Data & Analysis Service, The State of Senior Housing
2009
REFINANCING, LOAN
MATURITIES AND LACK OF TAKE OUT FINANCING
According to the National Investment Center for the Seniors
Housing and Care Industry, or NIC, senior housing
property-related commercial mortgages with an aggregate
principal amount of approximately $30.0 billion were
originated between the first quarter of 2002 and the fourth
quarter of 2008. NIC Key Financial Indicators for the same
period classify $18.2 billion of these originations as
short-term debt with maturities of less than 10 years
including bridge loans, acquisition financing, turn-around and
mezzanine financing but excluding construction and mini-perm
loans. During that same period, conventional construction
finance tracked by NIC totaled $1.4 billion for independent
and assisted living, which includes units located in continuing
care retirement communities. We believe that a number of these
are term loans and construction mini-perm loans that are
scheduled to mature over the next three years. In the current
recessionary environment, traditional lending sources, such as
banks, insurance companies and pension funds, have adopted more
conservative lending policies and have made fewer new lending
commitments to health care properties. Furthermore, the
commercial mortgage-backed security, or CMBS, market, which has
historically provided a significant amount of debt to the real
estate industry, especially from 2004 through 2007, effectively
has been closed since July 2008. U.S. domestic CMBS
issuances declined from a high of $233.4 billion in 2007 to
$15.8 billion in 2008 and $11.7 billion in 2009
according to Commercial Mortgage Alert. We believe the current
and projected cash flows at some senior housing facilities, when
coupled with more conservative lending policies, will only
support mortgage financing that is significantly less than the
amounts currently borrowed against such properties. As a result,
we expect some owners of senior
103
Market
opportunity and industry overview
housing facilities will be unable to refinance maturing debt
without significant additional equity investment, which may
result in restructurings, sales or foreclosures. In some cases,
seller financing may be made available to qualified buyers.
Short and
Long-Term Debt Originations
Source: NIC Key Financial
Indicators 4Q 2009, NIC Map Data, & Analysis
Service
DRAMATIC MARKET
SHARE OPPORTUNITY FOR HEALTH CARE REITs
ASHAs 2008 Seniors Housing Statistical Handbook estimated
the 2008 supply of professionally managed private-pay
U.S. senior housing units to be 1,435,000 units. Since
that publication, we believe the supply of senior housing units
in the United States has increased to approximately
1,478,050 units. According to ASHAs 2009 Top 50
Owners report, health care REITs owned a total of 125,770
seniors housing units or 8.5% of the total estimated supply of
professionally managed inventory in the United States. We
believe a conservative estimate of $100,000 per unit represents
a total investment market of $147.8 billion of
professionally managed private-pay seniors housing assets,
$135.2 billion of which is not currently owned by health
care REITs. We believe a $135.2 billion potential
investment universe provides a significant deployment
opportunity for our company.
According to ASHA, the top 20 senior housing managers control on
a combined basis approximately 23.8% of the existing inventory
of independent and assisted living units, including
Alzheimers/dementia care units. We believe there is a
significant consolidation opportunity as facility operators seek
economies of scale to enhance profitability and that the
efficient blend of long-term equity and low leverage debt
offered by a company such as ours will make us a compelling
choice for long-term capital. A difficult debt market, higher
equity requirements, reduced institutional investor allocations
to real estate, and the short term investment horizons and
opportunistic hurdle rates for many equity investors severely
limit the capital choices for growth-minded managers. We believe
our management team has a demonstrated track record and will
have significant opportunities to deploy capital with the most
efficient and profitable facility operators.
104
Prior performance
summary
The information presented in this section represents the
historical experience of real estate programs for which Thomas
J. Hutchison III, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
served as the Chief Executive Officer. The information presented
in this section should be read in conjunction with the Prior
Performance Tables included in this prospectus as
Appendix A. Prospective investors should not assume they
will experience returns comparable to those experienced by
investors in the real estate programs discussed in this section.
Further, by purchasing shares of our common stock, investors
will not acquire ownership interests in any real estate programs
to which the following information relates.
During the ten-year period ended December 31, 2009,
Mr. Hutchison served in various capacities as an executive
officer of CNL Retirement, CNL Hotels and CNL Income Properties.
Mr. Hutchison served as Chief Executive Officer and
President of CNL Retirement from August 2003 to September 2005,
as President from June 2002 to August 2003 and as Executive Vice
President from February 2000 to June 2002. Mr. Hutchison
served as Chief Executive Officer of CNL Hotels from February
2003 to April 2007, as President from June 2002 to March 2003,
and as Executive Vice President from May 2000 to June 2002.
Mr. Hutchison served as Chief Executive Officer of CNL
Income Properties from August 2003 to August 2005, and as
President from August 2003 to April 2004. In addition,
Mr. Hutchison served as an executive officer of CNL
Retirement Corp., the external advisor of CNL Retirement, from
May 2000 to September 2005; of CNL Hospitality Corp., the
external advisor of CNL Hotels, from May 2000 to April 2005; and
of CNL Income Corp., the external advisor of CNL Income
Properties, from August 2003 to August 2005.
We believe it is appropriate to present information regarding
the prior performance of CNL Retirement, CNL Hotels and CNL
Income Properties because of the principal roles and
responsibilities of Mr. Hutchison during the periods when
he served as the Chief Executive Officer of these three entities
and their respective external advisors. The other sponsors of
these prior public programs included the two principals of CNL
Financial Group, Inc., James M. Seneff, Jr. and Robert A.
Bourne, and their affiliates. Mr. Seneff and
Mr. Bourne are not affiliated with us and are not
promoting, sponsoring or endorsing this offering or an
investment in our common stock. CNL Financial Group, Inc. and
its affiliates are not sponsors of and have no affiliation with
our company, have not participated in the preparation of this
prospectus and are not endorsing our company or an investment in
our common stock. The prior performance of CNL Retirement, CNL
Hotels and CNL Income Properties is no indication of the
performance we may achieve.
CNL
Retirement
CNL Retirement invested in independent and assisted living
facilities, continuing care retirement communities, medical
office buildings and other health care properties.
CNL
Hotels
CNL Hotels engaged primarily in the ownership of interests in
hotel and resort properties, including full service hotels and
resorts, limited service hotels and extended stay hotels, with a
focus during its last few years of operation prior to its sale
on luxury and upscale hotels and resorts.
CNL Income
Properties
CNL Income Properties, which currently operates as CNL Lifestyle
Properties, Inc., invests primarily in properties that reflect
or are impacted by the social, consumption and entertainment
values and choices of our society. Examples of the types of
properties that CNL Income Properties targets for investment
105
Prior performance
summary
are ski and mountain lifestyle resort properties, golf
facilities, entertainment properties such as theme parks and
water parks, marinas and other lifestyle properties.
We have provided below, for each of CNL Retirement, CNL Hotels
and CNL Income Properties, information relating to the number of
properties acquired, the aggregate purchase price of properties
and the number of properties sold for the period from
July 1, 2003 to September 30, 2005 for each of CNL
Retirement and CNL Income Properties and from January 1,
2003 to April 30, 2007 for CNL Hotels. We have provided the
information for these periods, rather than for the period from
each programs inception through its completion (or in the
case of CNL Income Properties through a recent date), because
the periods presented encompass the periods when
Mr. Hutchison served as Chief Executive Officer of the
applicable program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
properties
|
|
|
purchase
|
|
|
properties
|
|
Name of
program
|
|
acquired
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
CNL Retirement
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
$
|
2,476
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
CNL Hotels
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
5,189
|
(2)
|
|
|
76
|
(5)
|
CNL Income Properties
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
372
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total public programs
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
$
|
8,037
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Based on purchase price. Approximately 39.1% of these
properties were commercial properties (medical office buildings,
specialty hospitals and walk-in clinics) and approximately 60.9%
were residential, senior housing facilities.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Based on purchase price. All of these properties were
commercial properties (100% were hotels).
|
|
(3)
|
|
Based on purchase price. All of these properties were
commercial properties (ski resort properties, golf facilities,
attractions such as theme parks and water parks and other
commercial properties).
|
|
(4)
|
|
CNL Retirement was acquired by HCP, Inc., an unaffiliated
publicly-traded REIT, in October 2006, approximately
13 months after Mr. Hutchison resigned from his
position as its Chief Executive Officer. Because the merger of
CNL Retirement with HCP, Inc. was not completed until
approximately 13 months after Mr. Hutchisons
resignation as its Chief Executive Officer, we do not consider
CNL Retirement to be a completed program for purposes of
presenting the prior performance of programs that were partially
sponsored by Mr. Hutchison.
|
|
(5)
|
|
CNL Hotels was acquired by Morgan Stanley Real Estate, a
global real estate investing, banking and lending company, in
April 2007, and in connection with such acquisition, certain
assets of CNL Hotels were purchased by Ashford Sapphire
Acquisition LLC. Therefore, CNL Hotels is considered a completed
program.
|
|
(6)
|
|
CNL Income Properties, currently known as CNL Lifestyle
Properties, Inc., continued its operations after
Mr. Hutchison resigned from his position as its Chief
Executive Officer and continues its operations today; therefore,
we do not consider CNL Income Properties to be a completed
program.
|
Source: CNL Retirement, CNL Hotels and CNL Income Properties
SEC filings.
Information relating to the public offerings of CNL Retirement,
CNL Hotels and CNL Income Properties is as follows. All
information is historical. The information is presented for the
time periods during which Mr. Hutchison served as Chief
Executive Officer of each entity and the entity was conducting
capital raising activities.
106
Prior performance
summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
offering
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Name of
program
|
|
raised
|
|
|
closed
|
|
|
sold
|
|
|
|
|
CNL Retirement
|
|
$
|
1.7 billion
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
CNL Hotels
|
|
$
|
1.9 billion
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
CNL Income Properties
|
|
$
|
247.0 million
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
From July 1, 2003 through September 3, 2005, which
encompasses the entire period during which Mr. Hutchison
served as Chief Executive Officer of CNL Retirement, CNL
Retirement raised approximately $1.7 billion of equity
capital through a fixed-price continuous public offering of its
common stock. As of April 2006, 90% or more of such amount had
been invested or committed for investment in properties and
mortgage loans. As of September 30, 2006, approximately 40%
of the assets acquired by CNL Retirement had been funded using
debt. The balance were acquired using proceeds from CNL
Retirements common stock offerings. In October 2006, the
company merged with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary of HCP,
Inc.
|
|
(2)
|
|
From January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2006,
which is the period during Mr. Hutchisons tenure as
the Chief Executive Officer of CNL Hotels during which CNL
Hotels was engaged in raising capital through the public
offering of its common stock, CNL Hotels raised approximately
$1.9 billion of equity capital through a fixed-price
continuous public offering of its common stock. As of
December 31, 2006, 90% or more of such amount had been
invested or committed for investment in properties and mortgage
loans. As of December 31, 2006, approximately 53.3% of the
assets acquired by CNL Hotels had been funded using debt. The
balance were acquired using proceeds from CNL Hotels
common stock offerings. In April 2007, the company was acquired
by Morgan Stanley Real Estate and in connection with such
acquisition, certain assets of the company were purchased by
Ashford Sapphire Acquisition LLC.
|
|
(3)
|
|
From April 1, 2004, which is the beginning of the
quarter in which CNL Income Properties commenced its capital
raising activities, through September 30, 2005, which
encompasses the entire period during which Mr. Hutchison
served as Chief Executive Officer of CNL Income Properties, and
CNL Income Properties was conducting capital raising activities,
CNL Income Properties raised a total of approximately
$247.0 million of equity capital through a fixed price
continuous public offering of its common stock. As of
March 31, 2005, 90% or more of the equity capital raised
during that period had been invested or committed for investment
in properties and mortgage loans. As of September 30, 2005,
approximately 62.0% of the assets acquired by CNL Income
Properties had been funded using debt and the balance were
acquired using proceeds from the companys common stock
offerings.
|
Source: CNL Retirement, CNL Hotels and CNL Income Properties
SEC filings.
Adverse Business
Developments and External Market Factors
Each of CNL Retirement, CNL Hotels and CNL Income Properties was
impacted by general market trends and other external factors
that were unrelated to management actions. For example, the
returns that CNL Retirement was able to achieve for its
stockholders as described above were positively impacted by:
|
|
Ø
|
positive trends in the growth of persons in the United States
age 65 and older, which increased demand for the senior
housing assets owned by CNL Retirement;
|
|
Ø
|
positive trends in senior housing occupancy rates across the
entire senior housing industry, especially in the 2003 through
2006 period, which supported internal revenue growth across the
industry and in many of CNL Retirements assets;
|
107
Prior performance
summary
|
|
Ø
|
a trend to lower capitalization rates (and therefore higher
market values) for senior housing assets, especially over the
2002 through 2006 period, which was fueled by a credit and
capital rich market environment;
|
|
Ø
|
positive economic and employment conditions, especially over the
2002 through 2006 period; and
|
|
Ø
|
modest annual average rate growth rates in the supply of new
senior housing in many markets, especially through 2005, which
supported internal revenue growth for existing facilities across
the industry.
|
However, CNL Retirement also faced considerable external
challenges as a result of selected overbuilding of senior
housing in certain markets. In some cases, this overbuilding
reduced monthly revenue rates that communities were able to
obtain for their services. The performance of CNL Retirement was
also impacted by adverse business developments that occurred in
connection with the operation of CNL Retirements business.
These included the purchase of certain properties as part of
larger portfolio acquisitions that were in need of significant
capital improvements or that were nonperforming. In some cases,
these properties were sold at a loss. CNL Retirement also funded
certain dividend payments using the proceeds of equity capital
raises or debt and, as a result, these dividends were treated as
a return of capital. For more information regarding external
market factors impacting CNL Retirement, see Market
Opportunity and Industry Overview.
CNL Hotels experienced significant challenges resulting from
severe downturns in the hospitality industry, such as the period
following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001,
which negatively affected CNL Hotels earnings. CNL Hotels
was also negatively impacted by certain adverse business
developments that occurred in connection with the operation of
CNL Hotels business. These included:
|
|
Ø
|
an attempt by CNL Hotels to complete a registered underwritten
public offering of shares of its common stock and a related
listing of the companys outstanding shares of common stock
in 2004, which offering and listing were abandoned;
|
|
Ø
|
an attempt by CNL Hotels to acquire CNL Hotels Corp., the
external advisor of CNL Hotels, through a merger in 2004, which
merger was abandoned and then subsequently renegotiated for a
substantially reduced amount of merger consideration; and
|
|
Ø
|
certain stockholder class action lawsuits that were filed
against various CNL Hotels affiliates, including certain
officers and directors of CNL Hotels and its external advisor,
including Mr. Hutchison, arising out of, among other
things, the terms of the proposed merger of CNL Hotels Corp.
into CNL Hotels, which lawsuits were settled.
|
CNL Income Properties also faced challenges resulting from the
downturn in the hospitality and travel industries following the
terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. In addition, CNL
Income Properties was negatively impacted by certain adverse
business developments that occurred in connection with the
operation of its business during the period when
Mr. Hutchison served as its Chief Executive Officer. These
included:
|
|
Ø
|
challenges associated with the formation and
start-up
of
a newly formed investment vehicle, including capital raising and
sourcing of acquisition opportunities;
|
|
Ø
|
the lack of focus on a specific property type; and
|
|
Ø
|
availability of debt financing for non-core real estate assets.
|
For additional information, please refer to the Prior
Performance Tables included with this prospectus as
Appendix A.
In order to enable potential investors to evaluate the prior
experience of Mr. Hutchison concerning the prior public
programs described above, we have provided the foregoing tables
and encourage potential
108
Prior performance
summary
investors to examine certain financial and other information in
the Prior Performance Tables included as
Appendix A
of this prospectus.
The information presented above regarding CNL Retirement, CNL
Hotels and CNL Income Properties and their prior performance is
based entirely on information contained in the SEC filings of
these entities which are publicly available through the
SECs website at www.sec.gov. KPMG LLP, our independent
registered public accounting firm, has not independently
verified the accuracy of the information contained in the SEC
filings of these entities.
109
Management
DIRECTORS AND
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Currently, our board of directors consists of one director,
Mr. Hutchison. Upon completion of this offering and the
concurrent private placement, our board of directors will
consist of six directors, a majority of whom will be
independent in accordance with the requirements set
forth in the NYSE listing standards. Each of the director
nominees named in the table below has agreed to serve as a
director upon completion of this offering and the concurrent
private placement. Our board of directors will be elected
annually by our stockholders in accordance with our bylaws. Our
bylaws provide that a majority of the entire board of directors
may establish, increase or decrease the number of directors,
provided that the number of directors shall never be less than
one nor more than fifteen. All of our executive officers will
serve at the discretion of our board of directors. Our board of
directors will determine whether our directors satisfy the
independence requirements set forth in the NYSEs listing
standards.
None of our executive officers manages, owns or controls a
material interest in any real estate investment entity or
vehicle that targets senior housing facilities or other health
care properties.
The following table sets forth the names and ages of our
executive officers, director and each person who has agreed to
become a director upon completion of this offering and the
concurrent private placement and the descriptions below set
forth certain biographical information about each such person.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
|
Thomas J. Hutchison III
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
Phillip M. Anderson, Jr.
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
Mark E. Patten
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
James R. Hendrix
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
Senior Vice President of Investments
|
John W. Krueger
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
Senior Vice President of Portfolio Management
|
James W. Duncan, Jr.*
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Director Nominee
|
Joseph E. Gibbs*
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Director Nominee
|
Dianna F. Morgan*
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Director Nominee
|
Robert E. Parsons, Jr.*
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Director Nominee
|
David M. Thomas*
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Director Nominee
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Independent in accordance with the requirements set forth in
the NYSE listing standards.
|
Thomas J. Hutchison III.
Mr. Hutchison
has served as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and as
our sole director since our formation in April 2010.
Mr. Hutchison is also the Chairman of Legacy Healthcare
Advisors, LLC, a strategic health care advisory firm he founded
in October 2008, and Legacy Hotel Advisors, LLC, a strategic
lodging advisory firm he founded in August 2008. Prior to
forming our company, Mr. Hutchison served in various
capacities as an executive officer of CNL Retirement, CNL Hotels
and CNL Lifestyle Properties, Inc. (formerly CNL Income
Properties, Inc.). Mr. Hutchison served as Chief Executive
Officer and President of CNL Retirement from August 2003 to
September 2005, as President from June 2002 to August 2003 and
as Executive Vice President from February 2000 to June 2002.
Mr. Hutchison served as Chief Executive Officer of CNL
Hotels from February 2003 to April 2007, as President from June
2002 to March 2003, and as Executive Vice President from May
2000 to June 2002. Mr. Hutchison served as Chief Executive
Officer of CNL
110
Management
Income Properties from August 2003 to August 2005, and as
President from August 2003 to April 2004. In addition,
Mr. Hutchison served as an executive officer of CNL
Retirement Corp., the external advisor of CNL Retirement, from
May 2000 to September 2005; of CNL Hospitality Corp.,
the external advisor of CNL Hotels, from May 2000 to
April 2005; and of CNL Income Corp., the external advisor
of CNL Income Properties from August 2003 to
August 2005.
From 1995 to 2000, Mr. Hutchison was Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Atlantic Realty Service, Inc. and TJH
Development Corporation. Since 1990, he has fulfilled a number
of long-term consulting assignments for large corporations,
including managing a number of large international joint
ventures. From 1990 to 1991, Mr. Hutchison was the
court-appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of General
Development Corporation, a real estate community development
company, where he assumed the day-to-day management of the
NYSE-listed company through the reorganization process. From
1986 to 1990, he was the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
a number of personally owned real estate-related companies
engaged in the master planning and land acquisition of forty
residential, industrial and office development projects. From
1978 to 1986, Mr. Hutchison was the President and Chief
Executive Officer of Murdock Development Corporation and Murdock
Investment Corporation. Mr. Hutchison serves as a director
for numerous for-profit and not-for-profit organizations,
including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Real Estate
Roundtable, KSL Capital Partners, LLC, Hersha Hospitality Trust
(NYSE: HT), where he serves on the audit committee, compensation
committee, nominating and corporate governance committee and the
acquisition committee, and the Trinity Forum, Inc.
Mr. Hutchison attended Purdue University and received a
Bachelor of Arts degree. He also attended University of Maryland
School of Business and received a Master of Business
Administration degree. Mr. Hutchison was selected to serve
as our Chairman based on his experience in the senior housing
and real estate industries, including his executive leadership
experience, and his network of long-standing relationships with
real estate professionals. Mr. Hutchison is the
father-in-law
of James R. Hendrix, our Senior Vice President of Investments,
and John W. Krueger, our Senior Vice President of Portfolio
Management.
Phillip M. Anderson, Jr.
Mr. Anderson has
served as our President and Chief Operating Officer since our
formation in April 2010. He also serves as an executive officer
of Legacy Healthcare Advisors, LLC, a position he has held since
March 2010. Mr. Anderson has also served as the President
and owner of The Genova Company LLC, a real estate advisor and
investor, since October 2006. Mr. Anderson served as
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of CNL
Retirement and its external advisor from 1999 until October
2006. Prior to joining CNL Retirement, Mr. Anderson served
as the Senior Vice President of Development and Acquisitions and
other positions for Classic Residence by Hyatt, a privately held
corporation dealing with senior living communities, and its
affiliate, the Hyatt Corporation, from 1984 until 1998. Prior to
that, Mr. Anderson was employed by Georgia Power, an
operating public utility company in a variety of development and
construction functions from 1978 to 1984. Mr. Anderson
received his Bachelors degree in civil engineering,
cum laude, from Georgia Institute of Technology.
Mark E. Patten.
Mr. Patten has served as
our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since
April 2010. Most recently, Mr. Patten served as Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Simply Storage
Management, LLC, a privately held self-storage company, from
August 2007 to April 2010, where he managed its corporate
finance group including the accounting, financial reporting and
cash management functions as well as its information technology
and human resources departments. Mr. Patten previously
served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of
CNL Hotels from February 2004 until the sale of the company in
April 2007. At CNL Hotels, Mr. Patten managed its corporate
accounting, financial and SEC reporting, and cash management
functions. Mr. Patten served as Chief Financial Officer of
World Commerce Online Inc. from October 1999 to October 2001. In
August 2001, World Commerce Online filed a petition pursuant to
Chapter 11 of the federal
111
Management
bankruptcy laws. From February 1998 to October 1999,
Mr. Patten served as Chief Accounting Officer and Assistant
Corporate Secretary of Vistana Inc., a developer and operator of
timeshare resorts. Mr. Patten also spent approximately
12 years with KPMG LLP, including two years in KPMGs
Department of Professional Practice in New York and was elected
into the partnership of KPMG in 1997. Mr. Patten received
his Bachelor of Science in accounting from the University of
Florida and received his certification as a public accountant in
1988.
James R. Hendrix.
Mr. Hendrix has served
as our Senior Vice President of Investments since our formation
in April 2010. Mr. Hendrix has served as Managing Partner
of HJK Consulting Group, LLC, a real estate advisory business
specializing in the senior housing industry, from October 2006
to the present. Prior to that, from July 2003 to October 2006,
Mr. Hendrix served as Director of Investments for CNL
Retirement where he helped acquire and manage a multi-billion
dollar portfolio of health care real estate. Prior to CNL
Retirement, from September 2001 to July 2003,
Mr. Hendrix served as Project Manager for PlautSigma
Consulting, serving clients in the United States and Asia.
Mr. Hendrix received a Bachelors of Arts degree in
psychology from Wake Forest University and a Masters of Business
Administration from Rollins College with concentrations in
finance and entrepreneurship. Mr. Hendrix is the
son-in-law
of Mr. Hutchison.
John W. Krueger.
Mr. Krueger has served
as our Senior Vice President of Portfolio Management since our
formation in April 2010. Mr. Krueger has served as Managing
Partner of HJK Consulting Group, LLC, a real estate advisory
business specializing in the senior housing industry, from
October 2006 to the present. In addition, from April
2007 to December 2008, Mr. Krueger served as a
consultant to and later as Vice President of Investments for
Inland American Lodging Advisors where he helped invest and
asset-manage over $2 billion in hotel and seniors
housing assets for the Inland American REIT. Prior to Inland,
from October 2006 to March 2007, Mr. Krueger served as
Director of Asset Management for HCP, Inc. Prior to HCP,
Mr. Krueger served as Director of Asset Management for CNL
Retirement from March 2005 to October 2006 and as Senior
Manager of Investments for CNL Retirement from July 2003 to
March 2005. Mr. Krueger received a Bachelors of Arts degree
in sociology from Duke University. Mr. Krueger is the
son-in-law
of Mr. Hutchison.
In addition to Mr. Hutchison, the following persons have
agreed to become directors upon completion of this offering:
James W. Duncan, Jr.
Mr. Duncan is the
President of Navtrak, Inc., a mobile data and asset tracking
company that provides a web-based system to track vehicles in
commercial fleets, a position he has held since 2000.
Mr. Duncan served as a director of CNL Retirement from 2003
through 2006. During his tenure on the CNL Retirement board,
Mr. Duncan served as a member of the audit committee and as
chairman of two special committees of that companys board.
From 1994 through 2000, Mr. Duncan served as the President
of The Latrobe Group, LLC, a private investment company. From
1985 through 1994, Mr. Duncan was co-Chairman and President
of PersonaCare, Inc., a company he co-founded that provided
sub-acute, skilled nursing and assisted living care. Prior to
founding PersonaCare, Inc., Mr. Duncan was a partner at
Duncan & Smick, Inc., a commercial real estate
development firm. Mr. Duncan attended Wheaton College and
received a Bachelor of Arts degree in economics and he attended
University of Maryland School of Law and received a Doctor of
Jurisprudence degree. Mr. Duncan was selected to serve as a
director based on his experience in the senior housing and real
estate industries obtained through both senior officer positions
and directorships, and his experience in finance, accounting,
SEC reporting and risk assessment and management.
Joseph E. Gibbs.
Mr. Gibbs has served as
Chairman of Gibbs Investments, LLC since 2002. He previously
served as Co-Founder, Vice Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of TGC, Inc. (The Golf Channel) for ten years
from 1991 to 2001. Mr. Gibbs serves as a director of
Convergys Corp.
112
Management
(NYSE: CVG), where he is a member of the compensation and
benefits committee and the finance committee. After serving four
years in the Navy as a crewman navigator, Mr. Gibbs
graduated cum laude with a Bachelor of Arts degree from
University of Alabama and is a licensed certified public
accountant. Mr. Gibbs was selected to serve as a director
based on his global and diversified business knowledge and his
experience in the areas of finance, tax and audit.
Dianna F. Morgan.
Ms. Morgan is the
immediate past chair and is a current member of the Board of
Trustees of the University of Florida. She was originally
appointed to the University of Floridas Board of Trustees
in 2001. In addition, Ms. Morgan serves on the board of
directors of Chesapeake Utilities Corp. (NYSE: CPK), where she
is a member of the compensation committee, and Hersha
Hospitality Trust (NYSE: HT). Ms. Morgan also serves as a
director of CNL Bancshares, Inc. Ms. Morgan previously
served on the board of directors of CNL Hotels, where she was a
member of the audit committee and the compensation committee,
from July 2004 until it was sold in April 2007. Ms. Morgan
is also a member of the board of directors of Orlando Health
(formerly Orlando Regional Healthcare System) and serves as
vice-chair of the national board of the Childrens Miracle
Network. Previously, Ms. Morgan served as Senior Vice
President of Public Affairs and as Senior Vice President of
Human Resources for Walt Disney World Company where she oversaw
the Disney Institute, a recognized leader in experiential
training, leadership development, benchmarking and cultural
change for business professionals around the world.
Ms. Morgan received a Bachelor of Arts degree in
organizational communications from Rollins College.
Ms. Morgan was selected to serve as a director based on her
experience as a director and senior officer of public companies
in a variety of industries and her diversified business
knowledge.
Robert E. Parsons, Jr.
Mr. Parsons
has served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of Exclusive Resorts, LLC, a Denver-based luxury
residence club, since 2004. Prior to Exclusive Resorts,
Mr. Parsons spent over 20 years at Host Marriott
Corporation, a hospitality REIT focused on the ownership of full
service hotels, where, from 1995 to 2003, he served as Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Parsons
serves on the board of directors of Excel Trust, Inc.
(NYSE: EXL), where he is a member of the audit committee and the
chair of the compensation committee. He also previously served
as Chairman of the Hotel Development Council of the Urban Land
Institute and is the chair-elect of the National Advisory
Counsel of the Marriott Graduate School of Management at Brigham
Young University where he is also a member of the Executive
Committee. Mr. Parsons also served as a director of TenFold
Corporation (OTC Bulletin Board: TENF.OB), where he was a
member of the audit and compensation committee, and CNL Hotels.
Mr. Parsons received a Bachelor of Arts degree and a
Masters of Business Administration from Brigham Young
University. Mr. Parsons was selected to serve as a director
based on his experience as a director and senior officer in
public REITs and other real estate companies and his experience
in finance, accounting, SEC reporting and risk assessment and
management.
David M. Thomas.
Mr. Thomas has served on
the board of directors at Fortune Brands, Inc. (NYSE: FO) since
2004, where he is the lead director, chairman of the audit
committee, and a member of the nominating and governance
committee. Mr. Thomas also has served on the board of
directors of the Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. (NYSE:
IPG) since 2006, is chairman of the audit committee and a member
of the nominating and governance committee. Mr. Thomas has
also served on the board of trustees of Fidelity Investments
Institutional Services Company, Inc. since 2007, where he is
chairman of the proxy committee and a member of the equity
committee, the shareholder, distribution and brokerage committee
and the operations committee. Mr. Thomas was previously
Executive Chairman of IMS Health, Inc. from January 2005 until
March 2006 and previously Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of IMS Health, Inc. from 2000 to 2004. Prior to joining IMS
Health Inc., Mr. Thomas spent 28 years with IBM
Corporation, including serving as Senior Vice President/Group
Executive, personal systems group, from 1998 to 2000.
Mr. Thomas received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Industrial Engineering and Master of Science in Engineering from
the University of Florida. He was recognized with the
Distinguished Graduate Award
113
Management
from the University of Florida in 1996. Mr. Thomas was
selected to serve as a director based on his management
experience, his knowledge of the healthcare industry and his
experience in the areas of finance, tax and audit.
PROMOTERS
We consider Mr. Hutchison, our Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, and Mr. Anderson, our President and Chief
Operating Officer, to be our promoters, in that they have taken
initiative in funding and organizing our company.
Mr. Hutchison and Mr. Anderson are the only persons
whom we consider to be our promoters.
BOARD
COMMITTEES
Upon completion of this offering, our board of directors will
have an audit committee, a compensation committee and a
nominating and corporate governance committee. The composition
of each committee must comply with the listing requirements and
other rules and regulations of the NYSE, as amended or modified
from time to time. Each of these committees will have at least
three directors and will be composed exclusively of independent
directors, as defined by the rules, regulations and listing
qualifications of the NYSE, which generally deem a director to
be independent if the director has no relationship to us that
may interfere with the exercise of his or her independence from
management. Matters put to a vote at any one of our three board
committees will have to be approved by a majority of the
directors on the committee who are present at a meeting, in
person or as otherwise permitted by our bylaws, at which there
is a quorum or by unanimous written consent of the directors of
that committee.
Audit
committee
Our board of directors will establish an audit committee, which
will consist of Mr. Parsons (chair), Mr. Thomas (vice
chair) and Ms. Morgan. All members of the audit committee
will be independent and financially literate in accordance with
the listing requirements and other rules and regulations of the
NYSE, as amended or modified from time to time. In addition, all
members of the audit committee will be independent in accordance
with the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC. The audit
committee will make recommendations concerning the engagement of
independent public accountants, review with the independent
public accountants the plans and results of the audit
engagement, approve professional services provided by the
independent public accountants, review the independence of the
independent public accountants, consider the range of audit and
non-audit fees and review the adequacy of our internal
accounting controls. Mr. Parsons, an independent director, will
be our audit committee financial expert as that term is defined
by the SEC.
Compensation
committee
Our board of directors will establish a compensation committee,
which will consist of Mr. Gibbs (chair), Mr. Duncan
and Mr. Thomas. The compensation committee will determine
compensation for our executive officers, administer our 2010
Equity Incentive Plan, produce an annual report on executive
compensation for inclusion in our annual meeting proxy statement
and publish an annual committee report for our stockholders. All
members of the compensation committee will be independent in
accordance with the listing requirements and other rules and
regulations of the NYSE, as amended or modified from time to
time. In addition, all members of the compensation committee are
expected to be outside directors within the meaning
of Section 162(m) of the Code and non-employee
directors for purposes of
Rule 16b-3
under the Exchange Act.
114
Management
Nominating and
corporate governance committee
Our board of directors will establish a nominating and corporate
governance committee, which will consist of Ms. Morgan
(chair), Mr. Gibbs and Mr. Parsons. The nominating and
corporate governance committee will be responsible for seeking,
considering and recommending to the board of directors qualified
candidates for election as directors and recommending a slate of
nominees for election as directors at the annual meeting. It
also will periodically prepare and submit to the board of
directors for adoption the committees selection criteria
for director nominees. It will review and make recommendations
on matters involving general operation of the board of directors
and our corporate governance, and it will annually recommend to
the board nominees for each committee of the board. In addition,
the committee will annually facilitate the assessment of the
board of directors performance as a whole and of the
committees and individual directors and reports thereon to the
board of directors. All members of the nominating and corporate
governance committee will be independent in accordance with the
listing requirements and other rules and regulations of the
NYSE, as amended or modified from time to time.
CODE OF BUSINESS
CONDUCT AND ETHICS
Our board of directors will adopt a code of business conduct and
ethics that will apply to our employees, officers and directors.
We intend to maintain the highest standards of ethical business
practices and compliance with all laws and regulations
applicable to our business, including those relating to doing
business outside the United States. Specifically, our code of
business conduct and ethics will be designed to: deter
wrongdoing and to promote honest and ethical conduct; full,
fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in our SEC
reports and other public communications; compliance with
applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations; prompt
internal reporting of violations of our code of business conduct
and ethics; and accountability for adherence to our code of
business conduct and ethics prohibits payments, directly or
indirectly, to any foreign official seeking to influence such
official or otherwise obtain an improper advantage for our
business.
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
The members of the compensation committee of our board of
directors will be independent under the listing requirements and
other rules and regulations of the NYSE, as amended or modified
from time to time. Upon completion of this offering, none of
these directors or any of our executive officers will serve as a
member of the board of directors or compensation committee of
any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on
our board of directors or compensation committee.
INDEMNIFICATION
OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND LIMITATIONS ON
LIABILITY
For information concerning limitations of liability and
indemnification applicable to our directors, executive officers
and, in certain circumstances, employees, see Certain
Provisions of Maryland Law and of Our Charter and Bylaws.
DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION
Each of our independent directors will be paid a directors
fee of $30,000 per year in cash or stock. Each of our
independent directors will also receive the equivalent of
$40,000 per year in common stock grants in addition to
directors fees. The director who serves as the
compensation committee chairman will be paid an additional fee
of $5,000. The director who serves as the chairman of the audit
committee will be paid an additional fee of $10,000. The
director who serves as the chairman of the nominating and
corporate governance committee will be paid an additional fee of
$5,000. In addition,
115
Management
the independent members of our board of directors will appoint a
lead independent director, who will be paid an additional fee of
$10,000 per year. Directors fees and committee chair fees
will be paid one-half in cash and one-half in shares of our
common stock, although each director may elect to receive up to
all of his or her director fees in the form of our common stock.
Directors who are employees will receive no additional
compensation as directors. Each of the independent directors
will also receive a fee of $1,500 for each board of directors
meeting attended in person and $1,000 for each board of
directors meeting attended telephonically and a fee of $1,000
for each board committee meeting attended in person or
telephonically, other than for committee meetings that occur on
the same day as a board meeting. In addition, we will reimburse
all directors for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in
connection with their services on the board of directors.
Each of our director nominees who is not an employee will
receive an initial grant of 5,000 shares of restricted
common stock upon completion of this offering and the concurrent
private placement, subject to forfeiture restrictions that will
lapse one year from the date of grant.
COMPENSATION
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
We were only recently organized, and meaningful individual
compensation information is not available for periods prior to
our organization. We expect to pay base salaries and annual
bonuses and make grants of restricted common stock under our
2010 Equity Incentive Plan to our executive officers. Our board
of directors and our compensation committee have not yet adopted
compensation policies with respect to, among other things,
setting base salaries, awarding bonuses or making future grants
of equity awards to our executive officers. We anticipate that
such determinations will be made by our compensation committee
based on factors such as the desire to retain such
officers services over the long-term, aligning such
officers interest with those of our stockholders,
incentivizing such officer over the near-, medium- and
long-term, and rewarding such officer for exceptional
performance. In addition, our compensation committee may
determine to make awards to new executive officers to help
attract them to our company.
We anticipate that the primary goals and objectives of our
compensation program will be to: compensate our executive
officers, key employees, independent contractors and consultants
on a market competitive basis in order to attract, motivate and
retain high quality, high performance individuals who will
achieve our short-term and long-term goals; motivate and reward
our executive officers whose knowledge, skill and performance
are critical to our success; align the interests of our
executive officers and stockholders through equity based
long-term incentive awards that motivate our executive officers
to increase stockholder value and reward executive officers when
stockholder value increases; and ensure fairness among our
management team by recognizing the contributions that each
executive officer makes to our success.
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
We will enter into employment agreements with each of our
executive officers that will become effective upon the
completion of this offering. See Employment
Agreements below. Each of our executive officers named in
the Summary Compensation Table below, or the named executive
officers, will receive
116
Management
the initial base salary and other compensation indentified in
the following table commencing upon the completion of this
offering.
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION TABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
incentive plan
|
|
All other
|
|
|
Name and
principal position
|
|
Year
|
|
Base
salary
(1)(2)
|
|
awards
|
|
compensation
(2)(3)
|
|
compensation
(4)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Thomas J. Hutchison III
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phillip M. Anderson, Jr.
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
$
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark E. Patten
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James R. Hendrix
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
$
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
Senior Vice President of Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John W. Krueger
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
$
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
Senior Vice President of Portfolio Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Each executive will receive a pro rata portion of his 2010
base salary for the period from the completion of this offering
through December 31, 2010, except as otherwise noted.
Excludes consulting fees paid by an affiliate of
Mr. Hutchison to a consulting firm owned by
Messrs. Hendrix and Krueger prior to the completion of this
offering for consulting services provided by them in connection
with our formation, this offering, the acquisition of our
initial portfolio and evaluating other acquisition
opportunities. These consulting fees, totaling approximately
$120,000, will be included in our reimbursement to
Mr. Hutchison out of the net proceeds of this offering. We
will pay Mr. Patten consulting fees in an amount equal to a
pro rata portion of his 2010 base salary for the period from
April 20, 2010 through July 31, 2010 for services
provided by him in connection with our formation, this offering
and the acquisition of our initial portfolio. The consulting
fees payable to Mr. Patten are expected to be approximately
$64,000. See Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Following completion of this offering, we expect our
compensation committee to establish both individual performance
goals and company based performance targets, which may relate
to, among other things, stockholder returns, our operating
performance and the deployment of the proceeds of this offering,
for the members of our management team. For Mr. Hutchison,
goals and targets will also be established relating to his base
salary and he has agreed to waive $150,000 of his base salary
until such time as he achieves the goals and targets established
for him relating to his base salary.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Any performance-based cash compensation will be determined at
the sole discretion of the compensation committee of our board
of directors based on criteria to be determined by the
compensation committee after completion of this offering.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Our executive officers are entitled to receive
long-term
disability coverage equal to 75% of the executive officers
annual base salary and group life insurance coverage with a face
amount equal to one times the executive officers annual
base salary or, in the case of Mr. Hutchison, $1,000,000. We
will pay the premiums on all primary or supplemental disability
and supplemental life insurance policies provided for the
benefit of our executive officers and their designated
beneficiaries, and the value of these premiums will be treated
as taxable income to the executive officer.
|
117
Management
2010 EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN
Upon the completion of this offering, our board of directors
will have adopted, and our sole stockholder will have approved,
our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan to attract and retain independent
directors, executive officers and other key employees and
service providers, including officers and employees of our
affiliates. The 2010 Equity Incentive Plan provides for the
grant of options to purchase shares of common stock, stock
awards, stock appreciation rights, performance units, incentive
awards and other equity-based awards.
Administration of
the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan
The 2010 Equity Incentive Plan will be administered by the
compensation committee of our board of directors, except that
the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan will be administered by our board
of directors with respect to awards made to directors who are
not employees. This summary uses the term
administrator to refer to the compensation committee
or our board of directors, as applicable. The administrator will
approve all terms of awards under the 2010 Equity Incentive
Plan. The administrator will also approve who will receive
grants under the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan and the number of
shares of common stock subject to each grant.
Eligibility
All of our employees and employees of our affiliates and our
independent directors are eligible to receive grants under the
2010 Equity Incentive Plan. In addition, individuals who provide
significant services to us or an affiliate, including
individuals who provide services to us or an affiliate by virtue
of employment with, or providing services to, our operating
partnership, may receive grants under the 2010 Equity Incentive
Plan.
Share
authorization
The number of shares of common stock that may be issued under
the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan will equal the lesser of
(i) 1.0 million shares and (ii) 5.0% of the total
number of shares sold in this offering (including any shares
issued pursuant to the underwriters overallotment option)
and the concurrent private placement.
In connection with stock splits, dividends, recapitalizations
and certain other events, our board will make equitable
adjustments that it deems appropriate in the aggregate number of
shares of common stock that may be issued under the 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan and the terms of outstanding awards.
If any options or stock appreciation rights terminate, expire or
are canceled, forfeited, exchanged or surrendered without having
been exercised or are paid in cash without delivery of common
stock or if any stock awards, performance units or other
equity-based awards are forfeited, the shares of common stock
subject to such awards will again be available for purposes of
the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan. Shares of common stock tendered
or withheld to satisfy the exercise price or for tax withholding
are not available for future grants under the 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan.
No awards under the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan were outstanding
prior to completion of this offering. The initial grants
described below will become effective upon completion of this
offering.
Options
The 2010 Equity Incentive Plan authorizes the grant of incentive
stock options (under Section 422 of the Code) and options
that do not qualify as incentive stock options. The exercise
price of each option
118
Management
will be determined by the administrator, provided that the price
cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares
of common stock on the date on which the option is granted (or
110% of the shares fair market value on the grant date in
the case of an incentive stock option granted to an individual
who is a ten percent stockholder under
Sections 422 and 424 of the Code). Except for adjustments
to equitably reflect stock splits, stock dividends or similar
events, the exercise price of an outstanding option may not be
reduced without the approval of our stockholders. The exercise
price for any option is generally payable (i) in cash,
(ii) by certified check, (iii) by the surrender of
shares of common stock (or attestation of ownership of shares of
common stock) with an aggregate fair market value on the date on
which the option is exercised, equal to the exercise price, or
(iv) by payment through a broker in accordance with
procedures established by the Federal Reserve Board. The term of
an option cannot exceed ten years from the date of grant (or
five years in the case of an incentive stock option granted to a
ten percent stockholder). Incentive stock options
may only be granted to our employees and employees of our
subsidiaries.
Stock
awards
The 2010 Equity Incentive Plan also provides for the grant of
stock awards. A stock award is an award of shares of common
stock that may be subject to restrictions on transferability and
other restrictions as the administrator determines in its sole
discretion on the date of grant. The restrictions, if any, may
lapse over a specified period of time or through the
satisfaction of conditions, in installments or otherwise, as the
administrator may determine. A participant who receives a stock
award will have all of the rights of a stockholder as to those
shares, including, without limitation, voting rights and rights
to receive distributions. During the period, if any, when stock
awards are non-transferable or forfeitable, (i) a
participant is prohibited from selling, transferring, pledging,
exchanging, hypothecating or otherwise disposing of his or her
stock award shares, (ii) the company will retain custody of
the certificates and (iii) a participant must deliver a
stock power to the company for each stock award.
Upon completion of this offering, we will grant an aggregate of
25,000 shares of restricted common stock to our director
nominees pursuant to our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan. These stock
awards will be subject to forfeiture restrictions that will
lapse one year after the date of grant.
Stock
appreciation rights
The 2010 Equity Incentive Plan authorizes the grant of stock
appreciation rights. A stock appreciation right provides the
recipient with the right to receive, upon exercise of the stock
appreciation right, cash, shares of common stock or a
combination of the two. The amount that the recipient will
receive upon exercise of the stock appreciation right generally
will equal the excess of the fair market value of the shares of
our common stock on the date of exercise over the shares
fair market value on the date of grant. Stock appreciation
rights will become exercisable in accordance with terms
determined by the compensation committee. Stock appreciation
rights may be granted in tandem with an option grant or as
independents grants. The term of a stock appreciation right
cannot exceed ten years from the date of grant or five years in
the case of a stock appreciation right granted in tandem with an
incentive stock option awarded to a ten percent
stockholder.
Performance
units
The 2010 Equity Incentive Plan also authorizes the grant of
performance units. Performance units represent the
participants right to receive an amount, based on the
value of a specified number of shares of our common stock, if
performance goals established by the administrator are met. The
administrator will determine the applicable performance period,
the performance goals and such other
119
Management
conditions that apply to the performance unit. Performance goals
may relate to our financial performance or the financial
performance of our operating partnership, the participants
performance or such other criteria determined by the
administrator. If the performance goals are met, performance
units will be paid in cash, shares of our common stock, other
securities or property or a combination thereof.
Incentive
awards
The 2010 Equity Incentive Plan also authorizes our compensation
committee to make incentive awards. An incentive award entitles
the participant to receive a payment if certain requirements are
met. Our compensation committee will establish the requirements
that must be met before an incentive award is earned and the
requirements may be stated with reference to one or more
performance measures or criteria prescribed by the compensation
committee. A performance goal or objective may be expressed on
an absolute basis or relative to the performance of one or more
similarly situated companies or a published index and may be
adjusted for unusual or non-recurring events, changes in
applicable tax laws or accounting principles. An incentive award
that is earned will be settled in a single payment which may be
in cash, common stock or a combination of cash and common stock.
Other
equity-based awards
The administrator may grant other types of stock-based awards as
other equity-based awards under the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan,
including long-term incentive plan, or LTIP, units. Other
equity-based awards are payable in cash, shares of our common
stock or shares or units of such other equity, or a combination
thereof, as determined by the administrator. The terms and
conditions of other equity-based awards are determined by the
administrator.
LTIP units are a special class of partnership interest in our
operating partnership. Each LTIP unit awarded will be deemed
equivalent to an award of one share of common stock under the
2010 Equity Incentive Plan, reducing the plans share
authorization for other awards on a one-for-one basis. We will
not receive a tax deduction for the value of any LTIP units
granted to our employees. The vesting period for any LTIP units,
if any, will be determined at the time of issuance. LTIP units,
whether vested or not, will receive the same quarterly per unit
distributions as OP units, which distributions will generally
equal per share distributions on our shares of common stock.
This treatment with respect to quarterly distributions is
similar to the expected treatment of our stock awards, which
will generally receive full dividends whether vested or not.
Initially, LTIP units will not have full parity with OP units
with respect to liquidating distributions. Under the terms of
the LTIP units, our operating partnership will revalue its
assets upon the occurrence of certain specified events, and any
increase in the operating partnerships valuation from the
time of grant until such event will be allocated first to the
holders of LTIP units to equalize the capital accounts of such
holders with the capital accounts of OP unitholders. Upon
equalization of the capital accounts of the holders of LTIP
units with the other holders of OP units, the LTIP units will
achieve full parity with OP units for all purposes, including
with respect to liquidating distributions. If such parity is
reached, vested LTIP units may be converted into an equal number
of OP units at any time, and thereafter enjoy all the rights of
OP units, including redemption/exchange rights. However, there
are circumstances under which such parity would not be reached.
Until and unless such parity is reached, the value that a holder
of LTIP units will realize for a given number of vested LTIP
units will be less than the value of an equal number of our
shares of common stock.
Dividend
equivalents
The administrator may grant dividend equivalents in connection
with the grant of performance units and other equity-based
awards. Dividend equivalents may be paid currently or accrued as
contingent
120
Management
cash obligations (in which case they may be deemed to have been
reinvested in shares of common stock or otherwise reinvested)
and may be payable in cash, shares of common stock or other
property or a combination of the two. The administrator will
determine the terms of any dividend equivalents.
Change in
control
If we experience a change in control, the administrator may, at
its discretion, provide that outstanding options, stock
appreciation rights, stock awards, performance units, incentive
awards or other equity-based awards that are not exercised prior
to the change in control will be assumed by the surviving
entity, or will be replaced by a comparable substitute award of
substantially equal value granted by the surviving entity. The
administrator may also provide that outstanding options and
stock appreciation rights will be fully exercisable on the
change in control, restrictions and conditions on outstanding
stock awards will lapse upon the change in control and
performance units, incentive awards or other equity-based awards
will become earned and nonforfeitable in their entirety. The
administrator may also provide that participants must surrender
their outstanding options and stock appreciation rights, stock
awards, performance units, incentive awards and other equity
based awards in exchange for a payment, in cash or our shares of
common stock or other securities or consideration received by
stockholders in the change in control transaction, equal to the
value received by stockholders in the change in control
transaction (or, in the case of options and stock appreciation
rights, the amount by which that transaction value exceeds the
exercise price).
In summary, a change of control under the 2010 Equity Incentive
Plan occurs if:
|
|
Ø
|
a person, entity or affiliated group (with certain exceptions)
acquires, in a transaction or series of transactions, more than
50% of the total combined voting power of our outstanding
securities;
|
|
Ø
|
there occurs a merger, consolidation, reorganization, or
business combination, unless the holders of our voting
securities immediately prior to such transaction have more than
50% of the combined voting power of the securities in the
successor entity or its parent;
|
|
Ø
|
we (i) sell or dispose of all or substantially all of our
assets or (ii) acquire assets or stock of another entity,
unless the holders of our voting securities immediately prior to
such transaction have more than 50% of the combined voting power
of the securities in the successor entity or its parent; or
|
|
Ø
|
during any period of two consecutive years individuals who, at
the beginning of such period, constitute our board of directors
together with any new directors (other than individuals who
become directors in connection with certain transactions or
election contests) cease for any reason to constitute a majority
of our board of directors.
|
The Code has special rules that apply to parachute
payments, i.e., compensation or benefits the payment of
which is contingent upon a change in control. If certain
individuals receive parachute payments in excess of a safe
harbor amount prescribed by the Code, the payor is denied a
federal income tax deduction for a portion of the payments and
the recipient must pay a 20% excise tax, in addition to income
tax, on a portion of the payments.
If we experience a change in control, benefits provided under
the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan could be treated as parachute
payments. In that event, the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan provides
that the plan benefits, and all other parachute payments
provided under other plans and agreements, will be reduced to
the safe harbor amount, i.e., the maximum amount that may be
paid without excise tax liability or loss of deduction, if the
reduction allows the recipient to receive greater after-tax
benefits. The benefits under the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan and
other plans and agreements will not be reduced, however, if the
recipient will receive greater after-tax benefits (taking into
account the 20% excise tax payable by the recipient) by
receiving the total benefits. The 2010 Equity Incentive Plan
also provides that these
121
Management
provisions do not apply to a participant who has an agreement
with us providing that the individual is entitled to
indemnification or other payment from us for the 20% excise tax.
Amendment;
termination
Our board of directors may amend or terminate the 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan at any time, provided that no amendment may
adversely impair the rights of participants under outstanding
awards. Our stockholders must approve any amendment if such
approval is required under applicable law or stock exchange
requirements. Our stockholders also must approve, among other
things, any amendment that materially increases the benefits
accruing to participants under the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan,
materially increases the aggregate number of shares of common
stock that may be issued under the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan
(other than on account of stock dividends, stock splits, or
other changes in capitalization as described above) or
materially modifies the requirements as to eligibility for
participation in the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan. Unless
terminated sooner by our board of directors or extended with
stockholder approval, the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan will
terminate on the day before the tenth anniversary of the date
our board of directors adopted the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan.
Employment
agreements
Effective upon completion of this offering, we will enter into
employment agreements with our executive officers. These
agreements will have an initial term expiring December 31,
2013. Each employment agreement will provide for automatic
one-year extensions after the expiration of the initial term,
unless either party provides written notice of non-renewal. The
employment agreements will require each executive officer to
dedicate substantially all of his business time and efforts to
the performance of his duties as our executive officers.
The employment agreements will provide for, among other things:
|
|
Ø
|
an annual base salary of $400,000 for Mr. Hutchison
(provided, however, that Mr. Hutchison has agreed to waive
$150,000 of his annual base salary until such time as he
achieves the individual performance goals and company based
performance targets that will be established by our compensation
committee for him relating to his base salary), $250,000 for
Mr. Anderson, $200,000 for Mr. Patten and $175,000 for
Messrs. Hendrix and Krueger, subject to future increases
from time to time at the discretion of our board of directors or
the compensation committee of our board of directors;
|
|
Ø
|
eligibility for annual cash performance bonuses based on the
satisfaction of performance goals to be established by the
compensation committee of our board of directors;
|
|
Ø
|
participation in our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan and any
subsequent equity incentive plans approved by our board of
directors; and
|
|
Ø
|
participation in any group life, hospitalization or disability
insurance plans, health programs, pension and profit sharing
plans, relocation programs and similar benefits that may be
available to our other senior executive officers.
|
Mr. Hutchison will have a target annual cash performance
bonus equal to 125% of his annual base salary. Mr. Anderson
and Mr. Patten will have a target annual cash performance
bonus equal to 100% of their annual base salary. Messrs. Hendrix
and Krueger will have a target annual cash performance bonus
equal to 75% of their annual base salary. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, no cash performance bonuses will be paid to our
executive officers until our compensation committee establishes,
in its discretion, individual performance goals and company
based performance targets and those goals and targets are
achieved. We expect our compensation committee to establish
these individual performance
122
Management
goals and company based performance targets, which may relate
to, among other things, stockholder returns, our operating
performance and the deployment of the proceeds of this offering,
for the members of our management team following completion of
this offering.
Our executive officers are entitled to receive
long-term
disability coverage equal to 75% of the executive officers
annual base salary and group life insurance coverage with a face
amount equal to one times the executive officers annual
base salary or, in the case of Mr. Hutchison, $1,000,000. We
will pay the premiums on all primary or supplemental disability
and supplemental life insurance policies provided for the
benefit of our executive officers and their designated
beneficiaries, and the value of these premiums will be treated
as taxable income to the executive officer.
If we terminate the executive officers employment for
cause (as defined in the employment agreements), the
executive officer will be entitled to receive his annual base
salary and other benefits that have been earned and accrued
prior to the date of termination and reimbursement of expenses
incurred prior to the date of termination.
If the executive officer resigns without good reason
(as defined in the employment agreements), the executive officer
will be entitled to receive his annual base salary and other
benefits that have been earned and accrued prior to the date of
termination and reimbursement of expenses incurred prior to the
date of termination. If the executive officer elects not to
renew the employment agreement, the non-renewal will be treated
as a resignation without good reason.
Mr. Hutchisons employment agreement will provide
that, in the event of any non-renewal of
Mr. Hutchisons employment agreement (unless an
exception applies), if the nominating and corporate governance
committee of our board of directors fails to nominate him for
election to our board of directors for a period of one year
following the date of such non-renewal, all equity awards
granted to Mr. Hutchison under our 2010 Equity Incentive
Plan or any subsequent equity incentive plan approved by our
board of directors will immediately vest (and any performance
criteria for the year in which such non-renewal occurs will be
treated as satisfied) and, in the case of any options, become
vested and exercisable or, at the discretion of the board of
directors, may be cashed out or cancelled.
If we terminate the executive officers employment without
cause, the executive officer resigns for good reason or if we
elect not to renew the employment agreement, the executive
officer will be entitled to the severance benefits described
below. The severance benefits include the following:
|
|
Ø
|
In each case, the executive officer will be entitled to receive
his annual base salary and other benefits that have been earned
and accrued prior to the date of termination, reimbursement of
expenses incurred prior to the date of termination and any cash
or equity bonus compensation that has been earned and accrued
prior to the date of termination.
|
|
Ø
|
In the event we terminate the executive officer without cause or
if the executive officer resigns for good reason, the executive
officer will be entitled to receive a cash payment in an amount
equal to the sum of (1) the executive officers
then-current annual base salary, plus (2) the greater of
the annual cash bonus compensation most recently earned (whether
or not paid) and the average annual cash bonus compensation
actually paid for the last three full fiscal years, which sum
will be multiplied by three for Mr. Hutchison, two for
Mr. Anderson and Mr. Patten and one for
Mr. Hendrix and Mr. Krueger.
|
|
Ø
|
In the event we elect not to renew the executive officers
employment agreement, the executive officer will be entitled to
receive a cash payment in an amount equal to the sum of the
executive officers then-current annual base salary plus
the average annual cash bonus compensation actually paid for the
last three full fiscal years.
|
123
Management
|
|
Ø
|
In each case, the executive officer and his dependents will be
entitled to receive continuing coverage under health, dental,
disability and life insurance benefit plans for a period of
18 months after the executive officers termination.
We will have no obligation to provide these continuing benefits
if the executive officer becomes entitled to receive them from
another employer.
|
|
Ø
|
In each case, all equity awards granted to the executive officer
under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan or any subsequent equity
incentive plan approved by our board of directors will
immediately vest and any performance criteria for the year in
which such termination occurs will be treated as satisfied and,
in the case of any options, will become vested and exercisable
or, at the discretion of the board of directors, may be cashed
out or cancelled.
|
Each employment agreement will provide that the executive
officer or his estate will be entitled to certain benefits in
the event of his death or disability. Specifically, each
executive officer, or in the event of the executive
officers death, his beneficiaries, will be entitled to
receive:
|
|
Ø
|
the executive officers annual salary and other benefits
that are earned and accrued under the employment agreement and
the applicable benefit plans prior to the date of termination;
|
|
Ø
|
any cash or equity bonus compensation that has been earned and
accrued prior to the date of termination;
|
|
Ø
|
immediate vesting of any unvested equity incentive awards, with
any applicable performance criteria for the year in which such
death or disability occurs being treated as satisfied and any
options, will become vested and exercisable or, at the
discretion of our board of directors, be cashed out or cancelled;
|
|
Ø
|
reimbursement for
and/or
continuing coverage under our benefit plans for a period of
18 months after the executive officers
termination; and
|
|
Ø
|
reimbursement for expenses incurred prior to the date of
termination.
|
In addition, with respect to Mr. Hutchison only,
Mr. Hutchison or his estate will be entitled to receive an
additional amount equal to one year of his then-current annual
salary plus the amount of bonus compensation that would have
been payable to him in the year of his death or disability had
he achieved the target level for such year.
The employment agreements will provide that, if a change
in control (as defined in the employment agreements)
occurs, all equity awards granted to the executive officer under
our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan and any subsequent equity
incentive plans approved by our board of directors will
immediately vest (and the performance criteria will be treated
as satisfied) and, if applicable, become exercisable. In
addition, the employment agreements provide that we will
indemnify the executive officer for any parachute
payment as defined in Section 280G of the Code for
any excise tax liability, which would include our payment of the
excise tax liability as well as the income, excise tax and
employment tax liability attributable to payment of the excise
tax liability).
The employment agreements also contain standard confidentiality
provisions, which apply indefinitely and non-competition and
non-solicitation provisions which apply during the term of the
employment agreement and for one year following the executive
officers termination under certain circumstances.
401(k)
plan
We may establish and maintain a retirement savings plan under
Section 401(k) of the Code to cover our eligible employees.
The Code allows eligible employees to defer a portion of their
compensation, within prescribed limits, on a pre-tax basis
through contributions to the 401(k) plan. We may match
employees annual contributions, within prescribed limits.
124
The following is a discussion of our investment policies and our
policies with respect to certain other activities, including
financing matters and conflicts of interest. These policies may
be amended or revised from time to time at the discretion of our
board of directors, without a vote of our stockholders. Any
change to any of these policies by our board of directors,
however, would be made only after a thorough review and analysis
of that change, in light of then-existing business and other
circumstances, and then only if, in the exercise of its business
judgment, our board of directors believes that it is advisable
to do so and in our best interests. We cannot assure you that
our investment objectives will be attained.
INVESTMENTS IN
REAL ESTATE OR INTERESTS IN REAL ESTATE
We plan to invest principally in private-pay senior housing
facilities. At the completion of this offering and the
concurrent private placement, we will have identified only the
six senior housing facilities we currently have under contract
and a substantial portion of the net proceeds of this offering
and the concurrent private placement will not be committed to
any other specific senior housing acquisition. Our management
team will identify and negotiate acquisition opportunities. For
information concerning the investing experience of these
individuals, please see the sections entitled
Business, Prior Performance Summary and
Management.
We intend to conduct substantially all of our investment
activities through our operating partnership and its
subsidiaries. Our investment objective is to maximize total
returns to our stockholders through the payment of consistent
cash distributions and long-term capital appreciation.
There are no limitations on the amount or percentage of our
total assets that may be invested in any one property.
Additionally, no limits have been set on the concentration of
investments in any one location or facility type.
Additional criteria with respect to our health care properties
is described in BusinessInvestment Strategy.
INVESTMENTS IN
SECURITIES OF OR INTERESTS IN PERSONS PRIMARILY ENGAGED IN REAL
ESTATE ACTIVITIES AND OTHER ISSUERS
Generally speaking, we do not expect to engage in any
significant investment activities with other entities, although
we may consider joint venture investments with other investors.
We may also invest in the securities of other issuers in
connection with acquisitions of indirect interests in properties
(normally general or limited partnership interests in special
purpose partnerships owning properties). We may in the future
acquire some, all or substantially all of the securities or
assets of other REITs or similar entities where that investment
would be consistent with our investment policies and the REIT
qualification requirements. There are no limitations on the
amount or percentage of our total assets that may be invested in
any one issuer, other than those imposed by the gross income and
asset tests that we must satisfy to qualify as a REIT. However,
we do not anticipate investing in other issuers of securities
for the purpose of exercising control or acquiring any
investments primarily for sale in the ordinary course of
business or holding any investments with a view to making
short-term profits from their sale. In any event, we do not
intend that our investments in securities will cause us to fall
within the definition of investment company under
the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the
Investment Company Act. For this reason, we do not plan to
register as an investment company
125
Investment
policies and policies with respect to certain
activities
under the Investment Company Act, and we intend to divest
securities before any registration would be required.
Initially, we do not intend to engage in significant development
or redevelopment of our facilities. However, we may
opportunistically engage in partial redevelopment and
repositioning of certain facilities as we seek to maximize the
financial performance of the facilities we acquire. In addition,
we may acquire facilities that require significant capital
improvement, renovation or refurbishment. Although we do not
have any current plans to conduct any development activities, if
we find opportunities in attractive markets with high barriers
to entry and favorable pricing that may not have been available
to senior housing facilities in the past, we may evaluate and
pursue a very limited number of development opportunities.
We do not intend to engage in trading, underwriting, agency
distribution or sales of securities of other issuers.
INVESTMENT IN
REAL ESTATE MORTGAGES AND OTHER LOANS
While our initial portfolio will consist of, and our business
objectives emphasize, equity investments in senior housing
facilities, we may, at the discretion of our board of directors,
invest in real estate mortgages and other types of real estate
interests consistent with our qualification as a REIT. We may
consider acquiring outstanding mortgage loans secured by senior
housing facilities, mezzanine loans secured by interest in
entities that own senior housing facilities or similar real
estate-related debt if we believe we can ultimately acquire
ownership of the facility in the near term. While we do not
intend to originate any secured or unsecured real estate loans
or purchase any debt securities as a stand-alone, long-term
investment, we may from time to time provide short-term,
unsecured loans to a facility operator as a means of securing an
acquisition opportunity. Investments in real estate mortgages
and other loans have risks, including the risk that one or more
borrowers may default and the value of the collateral securing
our loan may not be sufficient to enable us to recoup our full
investment.
DISPOSITION
POLICY
Although we have no current plans to dispose of any of the
senior housing facilities we acquire, we will consider doing so,
subject to REIT qualification and prohibited transaction rules
under the Code, if our management determines that a sale of a
facility would be in our interests based on the price being
offered for the senior housing facility, the operating
performance of the senior housing facility, the tax consequences
of the sale and other factors and circumstances surrounding the
proposed sale. See Risk FactorsRisks Related to Our
Business.
FINANCING
POLICIES
Although our governing documents contain no limitations on the
amount of debt we can incur, we expect to maintain a reasonably
low-leverage capital structure and intend to target on a
long-term basis the sum of the outstanding principal amount of
our consolidated indebtedness and the liquidation preference or
redemption feature of any outstanding shares of preferred stock
of approximately 40% to 45% of the cost basis of our total
assets. In addition, our assumption of in-place mortgage debt in
connection with our initial acquisition may cause our
consolidated indebtedness to exceed the general limitation
described above. In the future, compliance with this limitation
will be judged at the time debt is incurred or shares of
preferred stock are issued, and a subsequent decrease in EBITDA
will not require us to repay debt or redeem shares of preferred
stock. Our board of directors will periodically review this
limitation and may modify or eliminate it without the approval
of our stockholders.
Generally, we do not expect to incur debt, pursuant to a
revolving credit facility or otherwise, until we have invested
substantially all of the net proceeds of this offering and the
concurrent private placement,
126
Investment
policies and policies with respect to certain
activities
other than assuming in-place mortgage debt in connection with a
senior housing acquisition. If we assume debt in connection with
our initial senior housing acquisitions, our debt level could
temporarily exceed the general limitation described above. In
measuring our debt for purposes of our general debt limitation,
we will utilize net debt, which is the principal
amount of our consolidated indebtedness and the liquidation
preference of any outstanding shares of preferred stock less the
amount of our cash.
Going forward, we will consider a number of factors when
evaluating our level of indebtedness and making financial
decisions, including, among others, the following:
|
|
Ø
|
the interest rate of the proposed financing;
|
|
Ø
|
the extent to which the financing impacts the flexibility with
which we asset manage our properties;
|
|
Ø
|
prepayment penalties and restrictions on refinancing;
|
|
Ø
|
the purchase price of properties we acquire with debt financing;
|
|
Ø
|
our long-term objectives with respect to the financing;
|
|
Ø
|
our target investment returns;
|
|
Ø
|
the ability of particular properties, and our company as a
whole, to generate cash flow sufficient to cover expected debt
service payments;
|
|
Ø
|
overall level of consolidated indebtedness;
|
|
Ø
|
timing of debt maturities;
|
|
Ø
|
provisions that require recourse and cross-collateralization;
|
|
Ø
|
corporate credit ratios, including debt service or fixed charge
coverage, debt to EBITDA, debt to total market capitalization
and debt to undepreciated assets; and
|
|
Ø
|
the overall ratio of fixed- and variable-rate debt.
|
EQUITY CAPITAL
AND OTHER POLICIES
Subject to applicable law and the requirements for listed
companies on the NYSE, our board of directors has the authority,
without further stockholder approval, to issue additional
authorized common stock and preferred shares or otherwise raise
capital, including through the issuance of senior securities, in
any manner and on the terms and for the consideration it deems
appropriate, including in exchange for property. Existing
stockholders will have no preemptive right to additional shares
issued in any offering, and any offering might cause a dilution
of investment. We may in the future issue common stock in
connection with acquisitions. We also may issue limited
partnership interests in our operating partnership in connection
with acquisitions of property.
Our board of directors may authorize the issuance of shares of
preferred stock with terms and conditions that could have the
effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a transaction or a
change in control of our company that might involve a premium
price for holders of our common stock or otherwise might be in
their best interests. Additionally, shares of preferred stock
could have distribution, voting, liquidation and other rights
and preferences that are senior to those of our common stock.
We may, under certain circumstances, purchase shares of common
or preferred stock in the open market or in private transactions
with our stockholders, if those purchases are approved by our
board of directors. Our board of directors has no present
intention of causing us to repurchase any shares, and any action
would only be taken in conformity with applicable federal and
state laws and the applicable requirements for qualifying as a
REIT.
In the future, we may institute a dividend reinvestment plan, or
DRIP, which would allow our stockholders to acquire additional
common stock by automatically reinvesting their cash dividends.
127
Investment
policies and policies with respect to certain
activities
Shares would be acquired pursuant to the plan at a price equal
to the then prevailing market price, without payment of
brokerage commissions or service charges. Stockholders who do
not participate in the plan will continue to receive cash
distributions as declared.
We have not engaged in trading, underwriting or agency
distribution or sale of securities of other issuers other than
our operating partnership and do not intend to do so. At all
times, we intend to make investments in such a manner as to
qualify as a REIT, unless our board of directors determines that
it is no longer in our best interest to qualify as a REIT. We
have not made any loans to third parties, although we may in the
future make loans to third parties consistent with our intention
to qualify as a REIT, including, without limitation, short-term
debt to facility operators as a means of securing an important
facility or portfolio. We intend to make investments in such a
way that we will not be treated as an investment company under
the Investment Company Act.
CONFLICT OF
INTEREST POLICY
Our current board of directors consists of Mr. Hutchison
and as a result, the transactions and agreements entered into in
connection with our formation prior to this offering and the
concurrent private placement have not been approved by any
independent directors.
Effective upon closing of this offering and the concurrent
private placement, we intend to adopt policies to reduce
potential conflicts of interest. Generally, we expect that our
policies will provide that any transaction, agreement or
relationship in which any of our directors, officers or
employees has an interest must be approved by a majority of our
disinterested directors. However, we cannot assure you that
these policies will be successful in eliminating the influence
of these conflicts. See Risk FactorsRisks Related to
Our Business.
REPORTING
POLICIES
After this offering, we will become subject to the information
reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, or the Exchange Act. Pursuant to these requirements,
we will file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy
statements and other information, including audited financial
statements, with the SEC. See Where You Can Find More
Information.
128
Principal
stockholders
We currently have outstanding 1,000 shares of common stock,
all of which are owned by our Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, Mr. Hutchison. Upon completion of this offering,
we will repurchase all 1,000 shares of common stock from
Mr. Hutchison at his cost of $1.00 per share.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
beneficial ownership of common stock by (i) each of the
persons who will become a director upon completion of this
offering, (ii) each of our executive officers and
(iii) our director, director nominees and executive
officers as a group upon completion of this offering and the
concurrent private placement. Unless otherwise indicated, all
shares are owned directly and the indicated person has sole
voting and investment power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
shares
|
|
|
|
|
Name of
beneficial owner
|
|
beneficially
owned
|
|
|
Percent of
class
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas J. Hutchison
III
(1)
|
|
|
297,296
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
Phillip M. Anderson,
Jr.
(1)
|
|
|
13,514
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mark E.
Patten
(1)
|
|
|
13,514
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
James R. Hendrix
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
John W. Krueger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
James W. Duncan,
Jr.
(2)
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Joseph E.
Gibbs
(2)
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Dianna F.
Morgan
(2)
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Robert E.
Parsons
(2)
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
David M.
Thomas
(2)
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive officers, director and director nominees as a group
|
|
|
349,324
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Represents less than 1% of the number of outstanding common
stock upon completion of this offering and the concurrent
private placement.
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes an aggregate of 324,324 shares of our common
stock that we will sell to certain of our executive officers in
the concurrent private placement at a purchase price per share
equal to the public offering price per share in this offering.
Mr. Hutchison has agreed to purchase 297,296 shares of
our common stock in the concurrent private placement.
Mr. Anderson has agreed to purchase 13,514 shares of
our common stock in the concurrent private placement.
Mr. Patten has agreed to purchase 13,514 shares of our
common stock in the concurrent private placement.
|
|
(2)
|
|
We will grant 5,000 shares of restricted common stock to
each director nominee upon completion of this offering, which
shares will be subject to forfeiture restrictions that will
lapse one year after the date of grant.
|
129
Certain
relationships and related party transactions
We will use approximately $0.1 million of the net proceeds
to reimburse Mr. Hutchison and his affiliates for
out-of-pocket
expenses he and his affiliates incurred in connection with the
formation of our company, approximately $0.6 million to
reimburse offering expenses which Mr. Hutchison has
advanced on our behalf, and approximately $0.7 million to
reimburse Mr. Hutchison for costs incurred by him in
connection with the acquisition of our initial portfolio,
primarily the earnest money deposit that Mr. Hutchison
advanced on our behalf. The reimbursement to Mr. Hutchison
and his affiliates includes approximately $120,000 of consulting
fees that an affiliate of Mr. Hutchison has paid to a
consulting firm owned by Messrs. Hendrix and Krueger for
consulting services provided by them in connection with our
formation, this offering, the acquisition of our initial
portfolio and evaluating other acquisition opportunities.
Mr. Hutchison is the father-in-law of Messrs. Hendrix and
Krueger.
We will pay Mr. Patten approximately $64,000 of consulting
fees upon completion of this offering for services provided in
connection with our formation, this offering and our acquisition
of our initial portfolio of senior housing facilities we have
under contract.
We will use $1,000 to repurchase the shares Mr. Hutchison
acquired in connection with the formation and initial
capitalization of our company.
We will sell an aggregate of 324,324 shares of our common
stock to certain of our executive officers in the concurrent
private placement at a price per share equal to the public
offering price in this offering. We will agree to register the
resale of the shares of common stock purchased by our executive
officers in the concurrent private placement once we have become
eligible to file a registration statement on
Form S-3
or another short-form of registration available to us. We will
bear expenses incident to the registration of these shares.
Upon completion of this offering, we will grant an aggregate of
25,000 shares of restricted common stock to our director
nominees.
Upon completion of this offering, we will enter into employment
agreements with Messrs. Hutchison, Anderson, Patten,
Hendrix and Krueger, which agreement will provide for payments
and other benefits to these officers, including certain
severance payments and benefits if their employment with us is
terminated under certain circumstances. See
ManagementEmployment Agreements.
We also expect to enter into indemnification agreements with
each of our directors and our executive officers that would
provide for indemnification and advance of expenses to the
maximum extent permitted by Maryland law.
130
Description of
securities
The following is a summary of the material terms of our
securities and our charter and bylaws. Copies of our charter,
bylaws and the form of warrant agreement (including the
contingent warrant issuance form) and the form of warrant
certificate are filed as exhibits to the registration statement
of which this prospectus is a part. See Where You Can Find
More Information.
GENERAL
Our charter provides that we may issue up to
500,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value
per share, and up to 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock,
$0.01 par value per share. Our charter authorizes our board
of directors, with the approval of a majority of the entire
board, to amend our charter to increase or decrease the
aggregate number of authorized shares of stock or the number of
authorized shares of stock of any class or series without
stockholder approval.
We issued 1,000 shares of common stock in connection with
our initial capitalization. Upon completion of this offering, we
will repurchase these shares. Upon completion of this offering
and the concurrent private placement, 9,099,324 shares of
common stock will be issued and outstanding, including
25,000 shares of restricted common stock to be granted to
our director nominees pursuant to our 2010 Equity Incentive
Plan, and no shares of preferred stock will be issued and
outstanding. Under Maryland law, stockholders generally are not
liable for a corporations debts or obligations.
COMMON
STOCK
Subject to the preferential rights, if any, of holders of any
other class or series of stock and to the provisions of our
charter regarding restrictions on ownership and transfer of our
stock, holders of shares of our common stock are entitled to
receive dividends if, when and as authorized by our board of
directors and declared by us out of assets legally available for
distribution and to share ratably in the assets of our company
legally available for distribution to our stockholders in the
event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, after
payment of or adequate provision for all known debts and
liabilities of our company.
Subject to the provisions of our charter regarding restrictions
on ownership and transfer of our stock and except as may
otherwise be specified in the terms of any class or series of
common stock, each outstanding share of our common stock
entitles the holder to one vote on all matters submitted to a
vote of stockholders, including the election of directors and,
except as may be provided with respect to any other class or
series of stock, the holders of such shares will possess the
exclusive voting power. There is no cumulative voting in the
election of our directors, and directors will be elected by a
plurality of the votes cast in the election of directors.
Consequently, at each annual meeting of stockholders, the
holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common
stock can elect all of the directors then standing for election,
and the holders of the remaining shares will not be able to
elect any directors.
Holders of shares of our common stock have no preference,
conversion, exchange, sinking fund, redemption or appraisal
rights and have no preemptive rights to subscribe for any
securities of our company. Subject to the provisions of our
charter regarding restrictions on ownership and transfer of our
stock, all holders of our shares of common stock will have equal
dividend, liquidation and other rights.
Our charter authorizes our board of directors, without
stockholder approval, to reclassify any unissued shares of our
common stock into other classes or series of classes of stock
and to establish the number of shares in each class or series
and to set the preferences, conversion and other rights, voting
powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends or other
distributions, qualifications or terms or conditions of
redemption for each such class or series.
131
Description of
securities
PREFERRED
STOCK
Our charter authorizes our board of directors, without
stockholder approval, to classify any unissued shares of
preferred stock and to reclassify any previously classified but
unissued shares of any class or series of preferred stock. Prior
to issuance of shares of each class or series, our board of
directors is required by the MGCL and our charter to set the
preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers,
restrictions, limitations as to dividends or other
distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of
redemption for each such class or series. Thus, our board of
directors could authorize the issuance of shares of preferred
stock that have priority over our common stock with respect to
dividends or rights upon liquidation or with terms and
conditions which could have the effect of delaying, deferring or
preventing a transaction or a change in control of our company
that might involve a premium price for holders of our common
stock or otherwise be in their best interests. As of the date of
this prospectus, no shares of preferred stock are outstanding
and we have no present plans to issue any preferred stock.
CONTINGENT
WARRANTS
In the event that (1) the volume-weighted average price
(VWAP) for our common stock over the
30-day
period commencing on the first trading day of our common stock
on the NYSE, or the
30-day
VWAP,
is less than the initial public offering price per share of our
common stock and (2) the warrants are approved for listing,
subject to official notice of issuance, on the NYSE or the NYSE
Amex, we will issue to each purchaser of our common stock in our
initial public offering one warrant for each share of our common
stock that it purchased in our initial public offering and that
it holds continuously throughout such
30-day
period. The amount of common stock that each warrant will give
the holder the right to purchase per share of common stock
purchased in this offering will depend on the extent to which
the
30-day
VWAP of our common stock is below the initial public offering
price. The actual number of shares that each warrant will give
the holder the right to purchase for each share of common stock
purchased by the holder in the initial public offering and held
for the full
30-day
period will be determined based on the extent to which the
30-day
VWAP
is less than the initial public offering price, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
warrant shares
|
|
|
|
to be issued
|
|
|
|
in respect of
|
|
|
|
each
qualifying
|
|
30-day
VWAP
(a)
|
|
share
(b)(c)
|
|
|
|
|
$18.50
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
$18.25
|
|
|
0.060
|
|
$18.00
|
|
|
0.125
|
|
$17.75
|
|
|
0.200
|
|
$17.50
|
|
|
0.275
|
|
$17.25
|
|
|
0.350
|
|
$17.00
|
|
|
0.425
|
|
$16.75
|
|
|
0.525
|
|
$16.50
|
|
|
0.625
|
|
$16.25
|
|
|
0.750
|
|
$16.00
|
|
|
0.875
|
|
$15.75 or below
|
|
|
1.000
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Based on an assumed initial public offering price of $18.50
per share, the midpoint of the initial public offering price
range shown on the cover of this prospectus.
|
132
Description of
securities
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
If the
30-day
VWAP
is between two of the VWAP data points shown above, the number
of shares that will be issuable pursuant to each warrant will be
determined by a straight-line interpolation between the two VWAP
data points (rounded to the nearest
one-hundredth
of a share).
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
A minimum of 200,000 warrants will be issued to satisfy the
applicable NYSE Amex listing standards.
|
For illustrative purposes only, assuming the initial public
offering price is $18.50 per share, which is the midpoint of the
initial public offering price range shown on the cover of this
prospectus, and the 30-day VWAP is $17.75 per share, an investor
who purchased 200 shares of our common stock in our initial
public offering, held those shares throughout the 30-day period
commencing on the first trading day of our common stock on the
NYSE and did not, directly or indirectly, sell, offer, contract
or grant any option to sell (including without limitation any
short sale), pledge, transfer, establish an open put equivalent
position on, or otherwise dispose of, or publicly announce an
intention to do any of the foregoing, with respect to the
200 shares purchased in our initial public offering, would
be eligible to receive 200 warrants, each of which would
entitle the investor to purchase 0.200 shares of our common
stock, or a total of 40 shares.
If the above described events occur and conditions are
satisfied, following the
30-day
period after our initial public offering, a contingent warrant
issuance form constituting notice will be mailed to each
registered and beneficial holder of shares of our common stock
as of the last day of the 30-day period following our initial
public offering, together with a letter of instruction pursuant
to which stockholders who are eligible to receive warrants will
be instructed how to properly complete, sign and return the form
to us. We expect that we will mail this form and the letter of
instruction promptly following the end of the 30-day period
commencing on the first trading day of our common stock on the
NYSE. Purchasers who are eligible to receive warrants must
complete, sign and return this form within 30 calendar days
of the date we mail the form and related letter of instruction,
in which they must, among other things, represent and warrant as
to the number of shares of common stock that they purchased in
our initial public offering, the number of shares that they have
held continuously throughout the
30-day
period commencing on the first trading day of our common stock
on the NYSE and that they have not, directly or indirectly,
sold, offered, contracted or granted any option to sell
(including without limitation any short sale), pledged,
transferred, established an open put equivalent position on, or
otherwise disposed of, or publicly announced an intention to do
any of the foregoing, with respect to any of the shares held
throughout such
30-day
period, which we refer to as qualifying shares.
The contingent warrant issuance form will also require that the
investor make representations and warranties as to the accuracy
of the information provided in the form, compliance with laws,
and certain other customary representations, warranties and
acknowledgments. The form will also require that the investor
indemnify us, the warrant agent, each underwriter in our initial
public offering and their respective directors, executive
officers and other control persons from and against any loss,
liability, claim, damage and expense arising out of or based
upon any false, misleading or incomplete representation,
declaration or warranty or breach or failure by the investor to
comply with any covenant or agreement made by the investor in
the contingent warrant issuance form.
The contingent warrant issuance form will also require that
investors who are eligible to receive warrants provide us with
the account information where the investors qualifying
shares are held, including the name and contact information of
the investors broker, and the investor will acknowledge
that we may seek to verify the accuracy of the responses
supplied by the investor in the contingent warrant issuance form
by obtaining additional information, including, without
limitation, by obtaining additional information from the
underwriters in the initial public offering or by contacting and
obtaining additional information from the investors broker
or other financial service providers, and the investor will be
required to consent to such verification process and waive any
privacy rights the
133
Description of
securities
investor may have under applicable law for purposes of such
verification process, subject to confidentiality restrictions
regarding any confidential information about the investor
obtained by us during such verification process.
Under the contingent warrant issuance form, the investor will
further acknowledge and agree that: (i) all questions as to
the validity (including the time of receipt), form, eligibility
and acceptance of the contingent warrant issuance forms will be
determined by us in our sole discretion, (ii) we reserve
the absolute right to reject any and all contingent warrant
issuance forms not in valid form or based on our findings in the
verification process and to determine whether the issuance of
warrants by us in respect of any such contingent warrant
issuance form would be unlawful, (iii) we reserve the
absolute right in our sole discretion, subject to applicable
law, to waive or amend any of the conditions relating to the
issuance of the warrants or to waive any defect or irregularity
in the contingent warrant issuance form of any particular
investor, whether or not similar conditions, defects or
irregularities are waived in the case of other investors and
(iv) interpretation of the terms and conditions of the
issuance of the warrants will be made by us in our sole
discretion and will be final and binding on all parties.
Assuming one share of our common stock is issuable upon exercise
of each warrant, all purchasers of common stock in the initial
public offering hold all of their shares for the full
30-day
period and we do not exercise our option to pay cash in lieu of
issuing shares upon exercise of warrants, the maximum number of
shares of common stock that could be issued upon full exercise
of all possible warrants is 8,750,000 shares, or
10,062,500 shares if the underwriters exercise in full the
option that will be granted to them to cover overallotments, if
any.
The warrants will be immediately exercisable on the date that
they are issued. The warrants will expire at 5:00 p.m., New
York time, five years after the date of the warrants
issuance, or earlier upon redemption by us.
At any time while the warrants are exercisable and an effective
registration statement covering the shares of our common stock
that are issuable upon exercise of the warrants is available and
a current prospectus relating to the shares of common stock
issuable upon exercise of the warrants is available for use by
the holders of the warrants, we may call the outstanding
warrants for redemption:
|
|
Ø
|
in whole and not in part;
|
|
Ø
|
at a price of $0.01 per warrant;
|
|
Ø
|
upon not less than 30 days prior written notice of
redemption, or the redemption period, to each
warrant holder and the warrant agent; and
|
|
Ø
|
if, and only if, the reported last sale price of our common
stock equals or exceeds $27.75 per share for any 20 trading
days within a 30 trading day period ending on the third business
day prior to but not including the date on which notice of
redemption is delivered to warrant holders and the warrant agent.
|
We will call the warrants for redemption by mailing a notice of
redemption to each warrant holder and the warrant agent. We will
also announce the redemption, including the specified redemption
date, at the time of mailing of the notice of redemption by
filing a Current Report on Form 8-K. The right to exercise
will be forfeited unless the warrants are exercised prior to the
date specified in the notice of redemption. On and after the
redemption date, a record holder of a warrant will have no
further rights except to receive the redemption price for the
holders warrant upon surrender of such warrant.
We will not redeem the warrants unless an effective registration
statement covering the shares of our common stock that are
issuable upon exercise of the warrants is effective and a
current prospectus relating to the shares of common stock
issuable upon exercise of the warrants is available for use by
the holders of the warrants throughout the redemption period.
134
Description of
securities
If the foregoing conditions are satisfied and we issue a notice
of redemption of the warrants, each warrant holder shall be
entitled to exercise his, her or its warrant prior to the
scheduled redemption date, subject to the ownership limits in
our charter. However, there can be no assurance that the price
of our common stock will exceed the redemption trigger price or
the warrant exercise price after the redemption notice is issued.
If we call the warrants for redemption, we may, in our sole
discretion, require all holders that wish to exercise warrants
to do so on a cashless basis. In such event, each
holder would pay the exercise price by surrendering the warrants
for that number of shares of our common stock equal to the
quotient obtained by dividing (x) the product of the number
of shares of our common stock underlying the warrants,
multiplied by the difference between the exercise price of the
warrants and the fair market value (defined below)
by (y) the fair market value. The fair market
value shall be determined by us based on the average of
the last reported sale price of our common stock for the
10 trading days ending on but not including the third
trading day prior to the date on which the notice of redemption
is delivered to the holders of warrants and the warrant agent.
This would have the effect of reducing the number of shares of
our common stock received by holders of the warrants.
The warrants will be issued in the form of one or more global
warrants as specified in the warrant agreement between us and
Mellon Investor Services LLC, as warrant agent. Each global
warrant will be registered in the name of The Depository Trust
Company, or DTC, or its nominee, and delivered by the warrant
agent to DTC, or its custodian, for crediting to the accounts of
its participants pursuant to DTC procedures. A global warrant
registered in the name of DTC or its nominee will be exchanged
for certificated warrants only if (i) DTC (A) has
notified us that it is unwilling or unable to continue as or
ceases to be a clearing agency registered under Section 17A
of the Exchange Act and (B) a successor to DTC registered
as a clearing agency under Section 17A of the Exchange Act
is not able to be appointed by us within 90 days or
(ii) DTC is at any time unwilling or unable to continue as
depositary and a successor to DTC is not able to be appointed by
us within 90 days.
The warrant agreement will provide that the terms of the
warrants may be amended without consent of any holder to cure
any ambiguity or correct any defective provision and will also
require the approval by the holders of a majority of the
then-outstanding warrants in order to make any change that
adversely affects the interests of the registered holders. You
should review a copy of the form of warrant agreement (including
the contingent warrant issuance form) and the form of warrant
certificate, which have been filed as exhibits to the
registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, for a
complete description of the terms and conditions applicable to
the warrants, including the terms and conditions of the issuance
of the warrants.
The exercise price and number of shares of our common stock that
are issuable upon exercise of the warrants may be adjusted in
certain circumstances, including in the event of a stock
dividend, or recapitalization, reorganization, merger or
consolidation of our company. However, the exercise price and
number of shares of our common stock that are issuable upon
exercise of the warrants will not be adjusted for issuances of
our common stock for cash or in connection with an acquisition
by us. Additionally, the exercise price of, and the number of
shares of common stock underlying, the warrants will not be
adjusted for any cash distributions.
The warrants may be exercised upon surrender of the warrant
certificate on or prior to the expiration date at the offices of
the warrant agent, with the exercise form on the reverse side of
the warrant certificate completed and executed as indicated,
accompanied by full payment of the exercise price, by certified
or official bank check payable to us, for the number of warrants
being exercised. Because the warrants will be issued in global
form, any exercise notice will be delivered to the warrant agent
through and in accordance with the procedures of DTC. In no
event (whether in the case of a registration statement not being
effective or otherwise) will we be required to net cash settle a
warrant exercise, nor will a holder be permitted to satisfy the
payment of the exercise price by tendering his or
135
Description of
securities
her shares of our common stock to us. Warrant holders will not
have the rights or privileges of holders of our common stock,
including voting rights, until they exercise their warrants and
receive shares of our common stock. After the issuance of shares
of our common stock upon exercise of the warrants, each holder
will be entitled to one vote for each share held of record on
all matters to be voted on by common stockholders.
Upon the valid exercise of a warrant, we have the right, but not
the obligation, to pay cash in an amount equal to the fair
market value of the shares of common stock that are issuable to
the holder as a result of the exercise. The fair market value of
such shares will be determined by us based on the average of the
last reported sale price of our common stock for the
10 trading days ending on the third trading day prior to
but not including the date the properly completed and executed
exercise notice is delivered to the warrant agent.
No warrants will be exercisable and we will not be obligated to
issue shares of our common stock unless, at the time a holder
seeks to exercise such warrant, a registration statement
relating to the shares of our common stock that are issuable
upon exercise of the warrants is effective and a current
prospectus relating to such shares is available and the common
stock has been registered or qualified or deemed to be exempt
under the securities laws of the state of residence of the
holder of the warrants. Under the terms of the warrant
agreement, we have agreed to use our best efforts to meet these
conditions and to maintain a current prospectus relating to the
shares of our common stock that are issuable upon exercise of
the warrants until the expiration of the warrants. However, we
cannot assure you that we will be able to do so and, if we do
not maintain an effective registration statement or a current
prospectus relating to the shares of our common stock that are
issuable upon exercise of the warrants, holders will be unable
to exercise their warrants and we will not be required to settle
any such warrant exercise. If the registration statement or
prospectus relating to the shares of our common stock that are
issuable upon the exercise of the warrants is not effective or
current, as applicable, or if our common stock is not qualified
or exempt from qualification in the jurisdictions in which the
holders of the warrants reside, we will not be required to net
cash settle or cash settle the warrant exercise, the warrants
may have no value, the market for the warrants may be limited
and the warrants may expire worthless.
No fractional shares will be issued upon exercise of the
warrants. If a holder exercises warrants and would be entitled
to receive a fractional interest of a share, we, upon exercise,
will round up the number of shares of common stock to be issued
to the warrant holder to the nearest whole number of shares of
common stock.
No warrant may be exercised if it would cause the holder to
beneficially or constructively own, as defined in our charter,
more than 9.8% of the outstanding shares of our common stock or
otherwise violate any of the other ownership restrictions in our
charter, assuming we elect to issue shares of common stock
rather than paying cash upon exercise of the warrant.
POWER TO INCREASE
OR DECREASE AUTHORIZED STOCK AND ISSUE ADDITIONAL SHARES OF
OUR COMMON STOCK AND PREFERRED STOCK
Our charter authorizes our board of directors, with the approval
of a majority of the entire board, to amend our charter to
increase or decrease the aggregate number of authorized shares
of stock or the number of authorized shares of stock of any
class or series without stockholder approval. We believe that
the power of our board of directors to increase or decrease the
number of authorized shares of stock and to classify or
reclassify unissued shares of our common stock or preferred
stock and thereafter to cause us to issue such classified or
reclassified shares of stock will provide us with increased
flexibility in structuring possible future financings and
acquisitions and in meeting other needs which might arise. The
additional classes or series, as well as the additional shares
of stock, will be available for issuance without further action
by our stockholders, unless such action is required by
applicable law
136
Description of
securities
or the rules of any stock exchange or automated quotation system
on which our securities may be listed or traded. Although our
board of directors does not intend to do so, it could authorize
us to issue a class or series that could, depending upon the
terms of the particular class or series, delay, defer or prevent
a transaction or a change in control of our company that might
involve a premium price for our stockholders or otherwise be in
their best interests.
RESTRICTIONS ON
OWNERSHIP AND TRANSFER
In order to qualify as a REIT under the Code, our shares of
stock must be beneficially owned by 100 or more persons during
at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months
(other than the first year for which an election to be a REIT
has been made) or during a proportionate part of a shorter
taxable year. Also, not more than 50% of the value of our
outstanding shares of capital stock may be owned, directly or
indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Code
to include certain entities) during the last half of a taxable
year (other than the first year for which an election to be a
REIT has been made).
Because our board of directors believes it is at present
essential for us to qualify as a REIT, our charter, subject to
certain exceptions, contains restrictions on the number of our
shares of stock that a person may own. Our charter provides
that, subject to certain exceptions, no person may beneficially
or constructively own more than 9.8% in value or in number of
shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares
of any class or series of our capital stock, or the Ownership
Limit.
Our charter also prohibits any person from (1) beneficially
owning shares of our capital stock to the extent that such
beneficial ownership would result in our being closely
held within the meaning of Section 856(h) of the Code
(without regard to whether the ownership interest is held during
the last half of the taxable year), (2) transferring shares
of our capital stock to the extent that such transfer would
result in our capital stock being beneficially owned by less
than 100 persons (determined under the principles of
Section 856(a)(5) of the Code), (3) beneficially or
constructively owning shares of our capital stock to the extent
such beneficial or constructive ownership would cause us to
constructively own 10% or more of the ownership interests in a
tenant (other than a TRS) of our real property within the
meaning of Section 856(d)(2)(B) of the Code or
(4) beneficially or constructively owning or transferring
shares of our capital stock if such ownership or transfer would
cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT under the Code, including
as a result of any operators that manage qualified health
care properties for our TRS lessee failing to qualify as
an eligible independent contractor under the REIT
rules. Any person who acquires or attempts or intends to acquire
beneficial or constructive ownership of our shares of stock that
will or may violate any of the foregoing restrictions on
transferability and ownership, or any person who would have
owned our shares of stock that resulted in a transfer of shares
to a charitable trust, is required to give written notice
immediately to us, or in the case of a proposed or attempted
transaction, to give at least 15 days prior written
notice, and provide us with such other information as we may
request in order to determine the effect of such transfer on our
status as a REIT. The foregoing restrictions on transferability
and ownership will not apply if our board of directors
determines that it is no longer in our best interests to attempt
to qualify, or to continue to qualify, as a REIT.
Our board of directors, in its sole discretion, may
prospectively or retroactively exempt a person from certain of
the limits described in the paragraph above and may establish or
increase an excepted holder percentage limit for such person.
The person seeking an exemption must provide to our board of
directors any such representations, covenants and undertakings
as our board of directors may deem appropriate in order to
conclude that granting the exemption will not cause us to lose
our status as a REIT. Our board of directors may not grant such
an exemption to any person if such exemption would result in our
failing to qualify as a REIT. Our board of directors may require
a ruling from the IRS or an opinion of counsel, in either case
in form and substance satisfactory to the board of directors, in
its sole discretion, in order to determine or ensure our status
as a REIT.
137
Description of
securities
Any attempted transfer of our capital stock which, if effective,
would violate any of the restrictions described above will
result in the number of shares causing the violation to be
automatically transferred to a trust for the exclusive benefit
of one or more charitable beneficiaries, except that any
transfer that results in the violation of the restriction
relating to our shares of capital stock being beneficially owned
by fewer than 100 persons will be void
ab initio
. In
either case, the proposed transferee will not acquire any rights
in the shares. The trustee of the trust will be appointed by us
and the automatic transfer will be deemed to be effective as of
the close of business on the business day prior to the date of
the purported transfer. Shares of our capital stock held in the
trust will be issued and outstanding shares. The proposed
transferee will not benefit economically from ownership of any
shares of stock held in the trust, will have no rights to
dividends or other distributions and will have no rights to vote
or other rights attributable to the shares of stock held in the
trust. The trustee of the trust will have all voting rights and
rights to dividends or other distributions with respect to
shares held in the trust. These rights will be exercised for the
exclusive benefit of the charitable beneficiary. Any dividend or
other distribution paid prior to our discovery that shares of
stock have been transferred to the trust will be paid by the
recipient to the trustee upon demand. Any distribution
authorized but unpaid will be paid when due to the trustee. Any
dividend or other distribution paid to the trustee will be held
in trust for the charitable beneficiary. Subject to Maryland
law, the trustee will have the authority (1) to rescind as
void any vote cast by the proposed transferee prior to our
discovery that the shares have been transferred to the trust and
(2) to recast the vote in accordance with the desires of
the trustee acting for the benefit of the charitable
beneficiary. However, if we have already taken irreversible
corporate action, then the trustee will not have the authority
to rescind and recast the vote.
Within 20 days of receiving notice from us that shares of
our capital stock have been transferred to the trust, the
trustee will sell the shares to a person designated by the
trustee, whose ownership of the shares will not violate the
above ownership limitations. Upon the sale, the interest of the
charitable beneficiary in the shares sold will terminate and the
trustee will distribute the net proceeds of the sale to the
proposed transferee and to the charitable beneficiary as
follows. The proposed transferee will receive the lesser of
(1) the price paid by the proposed transferee for the
shares or, if the proposed transferee did not give value for the
shares in connection with the event causing the shares to be
held in the trust (e.g., a gift, devise or other similar
transaction), the market price of the shares on the day of the
event causing the shares to be held in the trust and
(2) the price received by the trustee from the sale or
other disposition of the shares (net of any commissions and
other expenses). The trustee may reduce the amount payable to
the proposed transferee by the amount of dividends or other
distributions paid to the proposed transferee and owed by the
proposed transferee to the trustee. Any net sale proceeds in
excess of the amount payable to the proposed transferee will be
paid immediately to the charitable beneficiary. If, prior to our
discovery that shares of our capital stock have been transferred
to the trust, the shares are sold by the proposed transferee,
then (1) the shares shall be deemed to have been sold on
behalf of the trust and (2), to the extent that the proposed
transferee received an amount for the shares that exceeds the
amount he or she was entitled to receive, the excess shall be
paid to the trustee upon demand.
In addition, shares of capital stock held in the trust will be
deemed to have been offered for sale to us, or our designee, at
a price per share equal to the lesser of (i) the price per
share in the transaction that resulted in the transfer to the
trust (or, in the case of a devise or gift, the market price at
the time of such devise or gift) and (ii) the market price
on the date we, or our designee, accept the offer, which we may
reduce by the amount of dividends and other distributions paid
to the proposed transferee and owed by the proposed transferee
to the trustee. We will have the right to accept the offer until
the trustee has sold the shares. Upon a sale to us, the interest
of the charitable beneficiary in the shares sold will terminate
and the trustee will distribute the net proceeds of the sale to
the proposed transferee and any dividends or other distributions
held by the trustee shall be paid to the charitable beneficiary.
138
Description of
securities
If a transfer to a charitable trust, as described above, would
be ineffective for any reason to prevent a violation of a
restriction, the transfer that would have resulted in such
violation will be void
ab initio
, and the proposed
transferee shall acquire no rights in such shares.
All certificates, if any, representing shares of our capital
stock will bear a legend referring to the restriction described
above.
Every owner of more than 5% (or such lower percentage as
required by the Code or the regulations promulgated thereunder)
of our capital stock, within 30 days after the end of each
taxable year, is required to give us written notice, stating his
or her name and address, the number of shares of our capital
stock that he or she beneficially owns and a description of the
manner in which the shares are held. Each such owner will
provide us with such additional information as we may request in
order to determine the effect, if any, of his or her beneficial
ownership on our status as a REIT and to ensure compliance with
the ownership limits. In addition, each stockholder will upon
demand be required to provide us with such information as we may
request in good faith in order to determine our status as a REIT
and to comply with the requirements of any taxing authority or
governmental authority or to determine such compliance.
These ownership limitations could delay, defer or prevent a
transaction or change in control of us that might involve a
premium price for holders of our common stock or might otherwise
be in the interest of our stockholders.
TRANSFER AGENT
AND REGISTRAR
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock and
warrants is expected to be Mellon Investor Services LLC.
139
Shares eligible for
future sale
GENERAL
Upon completion of this offering and the concurrent private
placement, we will have outstanding 9,099,324 shares of our
common stock (10,411,824 shares if the underwriters
over-allotment option is exercised in full).
Of these shares, the 8,750,000 shares sold in this offering
(10,062,500 shares if the underwriters over-allotment
option is exercised in full) will be transferable without
restriction or further registration under the Securities Act,
subject to the limitations on ownership set forth in our
charter, except for any shares held by our
affiliates, as that term is defined by Rule 144
under the Securities Act. Any shares of our common stock
purchased by affiliates in this offering, the
324,324 shares of our common stock purchased by affiliates
in the concurrent private placement and the 25,000 shares of
restricted common stock that we will grant to our directors upon
completion of this offering pursuant to our 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan may be restricted shares as defined
in Rule 144. For a description of certain restrictions on
transfers of our common stock held by our affiliates, see
Lock-Up
Agreements below and Underwriting.
If we issue warrants to purchasers of our common stock in this
offering, the warrants will also be transferable without
restriction or further registration under the Securities Act,
except for any warrants held by our affiliates, as
that term is defined by Rule 144 under the Securities Act.
If any warrants are issued, additional shares of our common
stock would be issuable upon exercise of the warrants.
RULE 144
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, a person
(or persons whose shares are aggregated) who is not deemed to
have been an affiliate of ours at any time during the three
months preceding a sale, and who has beneficially owned
restricted securities within the meaning of Rule 144 for a
least six months (including any period of consecutive ownership
of preceding non-affiliated holders) would be entitled to sell
those shares, subject only to the availability of current public
information about us. A non-affiliated person who has
beneficially owned restricted securities within the meaning of
Rule 144 for at least one year would be entitled to sell
those shares without regard to the provisions of Rule 144.
A person (or persons whose shares are aggregated) who is deemed
to be an affiliate of ours and who has beneficially owned
restricted securities within the meaning of Rule 144 for at
least six months would be entitled to sell within any
three-month period a number of shares that does not exceed the
greater of 1% of the then outstanding shares of our common stock
or the average weekly trading volume of our common stock
reported through the NYSE during the four calendar weeks
preceding the filing of notice of the sale. Such sales are also
subject to certain manner of sale provisions, notice
requirements and the availability of current public information
about us.
REDEMPTION/EXCHANGE
RIGHTS
We may issue OP units to third parties in the future. Beginning
on the date that is 12 months following the issuance of
such units, our operating partnerships limited partners
will have the right to require our operating partnership to
redeem part or all of their OP units for cash, or, at our
election, shares of our common stock. The price at which we must
redeem OP units is based upon the fair market value of an
equivalent number of shares of our common stock at the time of
the redemption. If we wish to redeem OP units by issuing new
shares of our common stock, the issuance would be subject to the
ownership limits in our charter.
140
Shares eligible
for future sale
REGISTRATION
RIGHTS
Our operating partnerships limited partners (other than us
and our subsidiaries) will have the right to require our
operating partnership to redeem part or all of their OP units
for cash, or, at our election, shares of our common stock. We
have granted registration rights to those persons who will
receive shares of our common stock issuable upon redemption of
OP units. These registration rights require us to seek to
register all such shares of our common stock approximately
12 months after issuance of such OP units. Our operating
partnership will bear expenses incident to these registration
requirements. However, neither we nor the operating partnership
will bear the costs of (1) any underwriting discounts or
commissions or (2) any fees or expenses incurred by holders
of such shares of our common stock in connection with such
registration that we or the operating partnership are not
permitted to pay according to the rules of any regulatory
authority.
2010 EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN
Upon completion of this offering, our board of directors will
have adopted, and our sole stockholder will have approved, our
2010 Equity Incentive Plan. The number of shares that are
reserved for issuance under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan will
equal the lesser of (i) 1.0 million shares and
(ii) 5.0% of the total number of shares sold in this
offering (including any shares issued pursuant to the
underwriters over-allotment option) and the concurrent
private placement.
We anticipate that we will file a registration statement with
respect to the shares of our common stock issuable under the
2010 Equity Incentive Plan immediately prior to the completion
of this offering. Shares of our common stock covered by this
registration statement will be eligible for transfer or resale
without restriction under the Securities Act unless held by
affiliates.
LOCK-UP
AGREEMENTS
We, our operating partnership, our executive officers and
directors and our existing security holders have entered into
lock-up
agreements with the underwriters. Under these agreements,
subject to certain exceptions, we and each of these persons may
not, sell, offer, contract or grant any option to sell
(including any short sale), pledge, transfer, establish an open
put equivalent position within the meaning of
Rule 16a-l(h)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or
otherwise dispose of any shares of common stock, options or
warrants to acquire shares of common stock, or securities
exchangeable or exercisable for or convertible into shares of
common stock, including, without limitation, OP units, currently
or hereafter owned either of record or beneficially, or publicly
announce an intention to do any of the foregoing for a period of
180 days after the date of this prospectus without the
prior written consent of Jefferies & Company, Inc.
These restrictions will be in effect for a period of
180 days after the date of this prospectus (subject to
extension under certain circumstances). Jefferies &
Company, Inc. may, in its sole discretion and at any time or
from time to time before the termination of the
180-day
period, without public notice, release all or any portion of the
securities subject to
lock-up
agreements.
141
Certain provisions
of Maryland law and of our charter and bylaws
The following is a summary of the material provisions of
Maryland law applicable to us and of our charter and bylaws as
they will be in effect upon completion of this offering. Copies
of our charter and bylaws are filed as exhibits to the
registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. See
Where You Can Find More Information.
OUR BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
Our charter and bylaws provide that the number of directors of
our company will not be less than the minimum number required
under the MGCL, which is one, and, unless our bylaws are
amended, not more than fifteen and may be increased or decreased
pursuant to our bylaws by a vote of the majority of our entire
board of directors. Our charter provides that, at such time as
we become eligible to elect to be subject to Title 3,
Subtitle 8 of the MGCL (which we expect will be upon the
completion of this offering) and subject to the rights of
holders of one or more classes or series of preferred stock, any
vacancy may be filled only by a majority of the remaining
directors, even if the remaining directors do not constitute a
quorum, and any director elected to fill a vacancy will serve
for the full term of the directorship in which such vacancy
occurred and until a successor is elected and qualifies.
Pursuant to our charter, each member of our board of directors
is elected by our stockholders to serve until the next annual
meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor is duly
elected and qualifies. Holders of shares of our common stock
will have no right to cumulative voting in the election of
directors, and directors will be elected by a plurality of the
votes cast in the election of directors. Consequently, at each
annual meeting of stockholders, the holders of a majority of the
shares of our common stock will be able to elect all of our
directors.
REMOVAL OF
DIRECTORS
Our charter provides that, subject to the rights of holders of
one or more classes or series of preferred stock to elect or
remove one or more directors, a director may be removed only for
cause (as defined in our charter) and only by the affirmative
vote of holders of shares entitled to cast at least two-thirds
of the votes entitled to be cast generally in the election of
directors. This provision, when coupled with the exclusive power
of our board of directors to fill vacant directorships, may
preclude stockholders from removing incumbent directors except
for cause and by a substantial affirmative vote and filling the
vacancies created by such removal with their own nominees.
BUSINESS
COMBINATIONS
Under the MGCL, certain business combinations
(including a merger, consolidation, share exchange or, in
circumstances specified in the statute, an asset transfer or
issuance or reclassification of equity securities) between a
Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder (i.e., any
person (other than the corporation or any subsidiary) who
beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of the
corporations outstanding voting stock after the date on
which the corporation had 100 or more beneficial owners of its
stock, or an affiliate or associate of the corporation who, at
any time within the two-year period immediately prior to the
date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the
voting power of the then outstanding stock of the corporation
after the date on which the corporation had 100 or more
beneficial owners of its stock) or an affiliate of an interested
stockholder, are prohibited for five years after the most recent
date on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested
stockholder. Thereafter, any such business combination between
the Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder generally
must be recommended by the board of directors of such
142
Certain
provisions of Maryland law and of our charter
and bylaws
corporation and approved by the affirmative vote of at least
(1) 80% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of
outstanding shares of voting stock of the corporation and
(2) two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders
of voting stock of the corporation other than shares held by the
interested stockholder with whom (or with whose affiliate) the
business combination is to be effected or held by an affiliate
or associate of the interested stockholder, unless, among other
conditions, the corporations common stockholders receive a
minimum price (as defined in the MGCL) for their shares and the
consideration is received in cash or in the same form as
previously paid by the interested stockholder for its shares. A
person is not an interested stockholder under the statute if the
board of directors approved in advance the transaction by which
the person otherwise would have become an interested
stockholder. The board of directors may provide that its
approval is subject to compliance with any terms and conditions
determined by it.
As permitted by the MGCL, our board of directors has adopted a
resolution exempting any business combination between us and any
other person, provided that the business combination is first
approved by our board of directors (including a majority of
directors who are not affiliates or associates of such persons).
However, our board of directors may repeal or modify this
resolution at any time in the future, in which case the
applicable provisions of this statute will become applicable to
business combinations between us and interested stockholders.
CONTROL SHARE
ACQUISITIONS
The MGCL provides that holders of control shares of
a Maryland corporation acquired in a control share
acquisition have no voting rights except to the extent
approved by the affirmative vote of at least
two-thirds
of the votes entitled to be cast by stockholders entitled to
vote generally in the election of directors, excluding votes
cast by (1) the person who makes or proposes to make a
control share acquisition, (2) an officer of the
corporation or (3) an employee of the corporation who is
also a director of the corporation. Control shares
are voting shares of stock which, if aggregated with all other
such shares of stock previously acquired by the acquirer or in
respect of which the acquirer is able to exercise or direct the
exercise of voting power (except solely by virtue of a revocable
proxy), would entitle the acquirer to exercise voting power in
electing directors within one of the following ranges of voting
power: (1) one-tenth or more but less than one-third,
(2) one-third or more but less than a majority or
(3) a majority or more of all voting power. Control shares
do not include shares the acquiring person is then entitled to
vote as a result of having previously obtained stockholder
approval. A control share acquisition means the
acquisition of issued and outstanding control shares, subject to
certain exceptions.
A person who has made or proposes to make a control share
acquisition, upon satisfaction of certain conditions (including
an undertaking to pay expenses), may compel the board of
directors to call a special meeting of stockholders to be held
within 50 days of demand to consider the voting rights of
the shares. If no request for a meeting is made, the corporation
may itself present the question at any stockholders meeting.
If voting rights are not approved at the meeting or if the
acquiring person does not deliver an acquiring person statement
as required by the statute, then, subject to certain conditions
and limitations, the corporation may redeem any or all of the
control shares (except those for which voting rights have
previously been approved) for fair value determined, without
regard to the absence of voting rights for the control shares,
as of the date of the last control share acquisition by the
acquirer or of any meeting of stockholders at which the voting
rights of such shares are considered and not approved. If voting
rights for control shares are approved at a stockholders meeting
and the acquirer becomes entitled to vote a majority of the
shares entitled to vote, all other stockholders may exercise
appraisal rights. The fair value of the shares as determined for
purposes of such appraisal rights may not be less than the
highest price per share paid by the acquirer in the control
share acquisition.
143
Certain
provisions of Maryland law and of our charter
and bylaws
The control share acquisition statute does not apply to, among
other things: (1) shares acquired in a merger,
consolidation or share exchange if the corporation is a party to
the transaction or (2) acquisitions approved or exempted by
the charter or bylaws of the corporation.
Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the control share
acquisition statute any acquisition by any person of shares of
our stock. There can be no assurance that such provision will
not be amended or eliminated at any time in the future.
MARYLAND
UNSOLICITED TAKEOVERS ACT
Subtitle 8 of Title 3 of the MGCL permits a Maryland
corporation with a class of equity securities registered under
the Exchange Act and at least three independent directors to
elect to be subject, by provision in its charter or bylaws or a
resolution of its board of directors and notwithstanding any
contrary provision in the charter or bylaws, to any or all of
five provisions of the MGCL which provide, respectively, that:
|
|
Ø
|
the corporations board of directors will be divided into
three classes;
|
|
Ø
|
the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the votes cast in the
election of directors generally is required to remove a director;
|
|
Ø
|
the number of directors may be fixed only by vote of the
directors;
|
|
Ø
|
a vacancy on the board be filled only by the remaining directors
and that directors elected to fill a vacancy will serve for the
remainder of the full term of the class of directors in which
the vacancy occurred; and
|
|
Ø
|
the request of stockholders entitled to cast at least a majority
of all the votes entitled to be cast at the meeting is required
for stockholders to require the calling of a special meeting of
stockholders.
|
Without our having elected to be subject to Subtitle 8, our
charter and bylaws already (1) require the affirmative vote
of holders of shares entitled to cast at least two-thirds of all
the votes entitled to be cast generally in the election of
directors to remove a director from our board of directors,
(2) vest in our board of directors the exclusive power to
fix the number of directors, by vote of a majority of the entire
board, and (3) require, unless called by the Chairman of
our board of directors, our President, our Chief Executive
Officer or our board of directors, the request of stockholders
entitled to cast not less than a majority of all the votes
entitled to be cast at the meeting to call a special meeting.
Our charter provides that, at such time as we become eligible to
make the election provided for under Subtitle 8 (which we expect
we will be upon consummation of this offering), vacancies on our
board of directors may be filled only by the affirmative vote of
a majority of the remaining directors then in office, and
directors elected to fill a vacancy will serve for the full term
of the directorship in which the vacancy occurred. Our board of
directors is not currently classified. In the future, our board
of directors may elect, without stockholder approval, to
classify our board of directors or elect to be subject to any of
the other provisions of Subtitle 8.
CHARTER
AMENDMENTS AND EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS
Under the MGCL, a Maryland corporation generally cannot
dissolve, amend its charter, merge, sell all or substantially
all of its assets, engage in a share exchange or engage in
similar transactions outside the ordinary course of business
unless approved by the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled
to cast at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on
the matter unless a lesser percentage (but not less than a
majority of all of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter)
is set forth in the corporations charter. Our charter
generally provides that charter amendments requiring stockholder
approval must be declared advisable by our board of directors
and approved by the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to
cast a majority of all of the votes entitled to be cast on the
matter. However, our charters
144
Certain
provisions of Maryland law and of our charter
and bylaws
provisions regarding the removal of directors and restrictions
on ownership and transfer of our stock may be amended only if
such amendment is declared advisable by our board of directors
and approved by the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to
cast not less than two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be
cast on the matter. In addition, we generally may not merge with
or into another company, sell all or substantially all of our
assets, engage in a share exchange or engage in similar
transactions outside the ordinary course of business unless such
transaction is declared advisable by our board of directors and
approved by the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to
cast a majority of all of the votes entitled to be cast on the
matter. However, because operating assets may be held by a
corporations subsidiaries, as in our situation, this may
mean that one of our subsidiaries could transfer all of its
assets without any vote of our stockholders.
BYLAW
AMENDMENTS
Our board of directors has the exclusive power to adopt, alter
or repeal any provision of our bylaws and to make new bylaws.
ADVANCE NOTICE OF
DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS AND NEW BUSINESS
Our bylaws provide that, with respect to an annual meeting of
stockholders, nominations of individuals for election to our
board of directors and the proposal of other business to be
considered by our stockholders at an annual meeting of
stockholders may be made only (1) pursuant to our notice of
the meeting, (2) by or at the direction of our board of
directors or (3) by a stockholder who was a stockholder of
record both at the time of giving of notice and at the time of
the meeting, who is entitled to vote at the meeting on the
election of the individual so nominated or such other business
and who has complied with the advance notice procedures set
forth in our bylaws, including a requirement to provide certain
information about the stockholder and its affiliates and the
nominee or business proposal, as applicable.
With respect to special meetings of stockholders, only the
business specified in our notice of meeting may be brought
before the meeting. Nominations of individuals for election to
our board of directors may be made at a special meeting of
stockholders at which directors are to be elected only
(1) by or at the direction of our board of directors or
(2) provided that the special meeting has been properly
called for the purpose of electing directors, by a stockholder
who was a stockholder of record both at the time of giving of
notice and at the time of the meeting, who is entitled to vote
at the meeting on the election of each individual so nominated
and who has complied with the advance notice provisions set
forth in our bylaws, including a requirement to provide certain
information about the stockholder and its affiliates and the
nominee.
ANTI-TAKEOVER
EFFECT OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF MARYLAND LAW AND OF OUR CHARTER
AND BYLAWS
Our charter and bylaws and Maryland law contain provisions that
may delay, defer or prevent a change in control or other
transaction that might involve a premium price for our common
stock or otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders,
including business combination provisions, supermajority vote
and cause requirements for removal of directors, provisions that
vacancies on our board of directors may be filled only by the
remaining directors, for the full term of the directorship in
which the vacancy occurred, the power of our board to increase
or decrease the aggregate number of authorized shares of stock
or the number of shares of any class or series of stock, to
issue additional shares of stock of any class or series and to
fix the terms of one or more classes or series of stock without
stockholder approval, the restrictions on ownership and transfer
of our stock and advance notice requirements for director
nominations and stockholder proposals. Likewise, if the
provision in the
145
Certain
provisions of Maryland law and of our charter
and bylaws
bylaws opting out of the control share acquisition provisions of
the MGCL were rescinded, these provisions of the MGCL could have
similar anti-takeover effects.
LIMITATION OF
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS LIABILITY AND
INDEMNIFICATION
The MGCL permits a Maryland corporation to include in its
charter a provision limiting the liability of its directors and
officers to the corporation and its stockholders for money
damages, except for liability resulting from (1) actual
receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or
services or (2) active and deliberate dishonesty that is
established by a final judgment and is material to the cause of
action. Our charter contains a provision that eliminates such
liability to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law.
The MGCL requires a corporation (unless its charter provides
otherwise, which our charter does not) to indemnify a director
or officer who has been successful, on the merits or otherwise,
in the defense of any proceeding to which he or she is made, or
threatened to be made, a party by reason of his or her service
in that capacity. The MGCL permits a corporation to indemnify
its present and former directors and officers, among others,
against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable
expenses actually incurred by them in connection with any
proceeding to which they may be made, or threatened to be made,
a party by reason of their service in those or other capacities
unless it is established that:
|
|
Ø
|
the act or omission of the director or officer was material to
the matter giving rise to the proceeding and (1) was
committed in bad faith or (2) was the result of active and
deliberate dishonesty;
|
|
Ø
|
the director or officer actually received an improper personal
benefit in money, property or services; or
|
|
Ø
|
in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer
had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was
unlawful.
|
However, under the MGCL, a Maryland corporation may not
indemnify for an adverse judgment in a suit by or in the right
of the corporation or for a judgment of liability on the basis
that personal benefit was improperly received, unless in either
case a court orders indemnification if it determines that the
director or officer is fairly and reasonably entitled to
indemnification, and then only for expenses. In addition, the
MGCL permits a Maryland corporation to advance reasonable
expenses to a director or officer upon its receipt of:
|
|
Ø
|
a written affirmation by the director or officer of his or her
good faith belief that he or she has met the standard of conduct
necessary for indemnification by the corporation; and
|
|
Ø
|
a written undertaking by the director or officer or on the
directors or officers behalf to repay the amount
paid or reimbursed by the corporation if it is ultimately
determined that the director or officer did not meet the
standard of conduct.
|
Our charter authorizes us and our bylaws obligate us, to the
maximum extent permitted by Maryland law in effect from time to
time, to indemnify and, without requiring a preliminary
determination of the ultimate entitlement to indemnification,
pay or reimburse reasonable expenses in advance of final
disposition of such a proceeding to:
|
|
Ø
|
any present or former director or officer of our company who is
made, or threatened to be made, a party to the proceeding by
reason of his or her service in that capacity; or
|
|
Ø
|
any individual who, while a director or officer of our company
and at our request, serves or has served as a director, officer,
partner, trustee, member or manager of another corporation,
REIT, limited liability company, partnership, joint venture,
trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise and who is
made, or threatened to be made, a party to the proceeding by
reason of his or her service in that capacity.
|
146
Certain
provisions of Maryland law and of our charter
and bylaws
Our charter and bylaws also permit us to indemnify and advance
expenses to any individual who served our predecessor in any of
the capacities described above and to any employee or agent of
our company or our predecessor.
Upon completion of this offering, we intend to enter into
indemnification agreements with each of our directors and
executive officers that would provide for indemnification and
advance of expenses to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland
law.
Insofar as the foregoing provisions permit indemnification of
directors, officers or persons controlling us for liability
arising under the Securities Act, we have been informed that in
the opinion of the SEC, this indemnification is against public
policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore
unenforceable.
REIT
QUALIFICATION
Our charter provides that our board of directors may revoke or
otherwise terminate our REIT election, without approval of our
stockholders, if it determines that it is no longer in our best
interests to attempt to qualify, or to continue to qualify, as a
REIT.
147
Operating
partnership and the partnership agreement
The following summary of the terms of the agreement of
limited partnership of our operating partnership that will be in
effect upon completion of this offering does not purport to be
complete and is subject to and qualified in its entirety by
reference to the Agreement of Limited Partnership of Legacy
Healthcare Properties, LP, a copy of which is an exhibit to the
registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. See
Where You Can Find More Information.
MANAGEMENT
We will be the sole general partner of our operating
partnership, which we will organize as a Delaware limited
partnership. We will conduct substantially all of our operations
and make substantially all of our investments through the
operating partnership. Pursuant to the partnership agreement, we
will have full, exclusive and complete responsibility and
discretion in the management and control of the operating
partnership, including the ability to cause the operating
partnership to enter into certain major transactions including
acquisitions, dispositions, refinancings and selection of
lessees, make distributions to partners, and to cause changes in
the operating partnerships business activities.
TRANSFERABILITY
OF INTERESTS
We may not voluntarily withdraw from the operating partnership
or transfer or assign our interest in the operating partnership
or engage in any merger, consolidation or other combination, or
sale of all or substantially all of our assets in a transaction
which results in a change of control of our company unless:
|
|
Ø
|
we receive the consent of limited partners holding more than 50%
of the partnership interests of the limited partners (other than
those held by our company or its subsidiaries);
|
|
Ø
|
as a result of such transaction, all limited partners will
receive for each partnership unit an amount of cash, securities
or other property equal or substantially equivalent in value to
the greatest amount of cash, securities or other property paid
in the transaction to a holder of one share of our common stock,
provided that if, in connection with the transaction, a
purchase, tender or exchange offer shall have been made to and
accepted by the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding
shares of common stock, each holder of partnership units shall
be given the option to exchange its partnership units for an
amount of cash, securities or other property equal or
substantially equivalent in value to the greatest amount of
cash, securities or other property that a limited partner would
have received had it (A) exercised its redemption right
(described below) and (B) sold, tendered or exchanged
pursuant to the offer shares of common stock received upon
exercise of the redemption right immediately prior to the
expiration of the offer; or
|
|
Ø
|
we are the surviving entity in the transaction and either
(A) our stockholders do not receive cash, securities or
other property in the transaction or (B) all limited
partners (other than our company or our subsidiaries) receive
for each partnership unit an amount of cash, securities or other
property equal or substantially equivalent in value to the
greatest amount of cash, securities or other property received
in the transaction by our stockholders.
|
We also may merge with or into or consolidate with another
entity if immediately after such merger or consolidation
(i) substantially all of the assets of the successor or
surviving entity, other than partnership units held by us, are
contributed, directly or indirectly, to the partnership as a
capital contribution in exchange for partnership units with a
fair market value equal to the value of the assets so
contributed as determined by the survivor in good faith and
(ii) the survivor expressly agrees to assume all of our
obligations under the partnership agreement and the partnership
agreement shall be amended after any such merger or
consolidation so as to arrive at a new method of calculating the
amounts payable upon
148
Operating
partnership and the partnership agreement
exercise of the redemption right that approximates the existing
method for such calculation as closely as reasonably possible.
We also may (i) transfer all or any portion of our general
partnership interest to (A) a wholly owned subsidiary or
(B) a parent company or a majority-owned subsidiary of a
parent company, and following such transfer may withdraw as the
general partner and (ii) engage in a transaction required
by law or by the rules of any national securities exchange on
which shares of our common stock are listed.
We also may (i) merge or consolidate our operating
partnership with or into any other domestic or foreign
partnership, limited partnership, limited liability company or
corporation or (ii) sell all or substantially all of the
assets of our operating partnership, and may amend the
partnership agreement in connection with any such transaction,
if we receive the consent of limited partners holding more than
50% of the partnership interests of the limited partners (other
than those held by our company or its subsidiaries).
CAPITAL
CONTRIBUTION
We will contribute, directly, to our operating partnership
substantially all of the net proceeds of this offering as our
initial capital contribution in exchange for substantially all
of the limited partnership interests in our operating
partnership. The partnership agreement provides that if the
operating partnership requires additional funds at any time in
excess of funds available to the operating partnership from
borrowing or capital contributions, we may borrow such funds
from a financial institution or other lender and lend such funds
to the operating partnership on the same terms and conditions as
are applicable to our borrowing of such funds. Under the
partnership agreement, we are obligated to contribute the net
proceeds of any future offering of shares as additional capital
to the operating partnership. If we contribute additional
capital to the operating partnership, we will receive additional
partnership units and our percentage interest will be increased
on a proportionate basis based upon the amount of such
additional capital contributions and the value of the operating
partnership at the time of such contributions. Conversely, the
percentage interests of the limited partners will be decreased
on a proportionate basis in the event of additional capital
contributions by us. In addition, if we contribute additional
capital to the operating partnership, we will revalue the
property of the operating partnership to its fair market value
(as determined by us) and the capital accounts of the partners
will be adjusted to reflect the manner in which the unrealized
gain or loss inherent in such property (that has not been
reflected in the capital accounts previously) would be allocated
among the partners under the terms of the partnership agreement
if there were a taxable disposition of such property for its
fair market value (as determined by us) on the date of the
revaluation. The operating partnership may issue preferred
partnership interests, in connection with acquisitions of
property or otherwise, which could have priority over OP units
with respect to distributions from the operating partnership,
including the OP units we own as the general partner.
REDEMPTION
RIGHTS
Pursuant to the partnership agreement, any future limited
partners, other than us, will receive redemption rights, which
will enable them to cause the operating partnership to redeem
their limited partnership interests in exchange for cash or, at
our option, shares of common stock on a one-for-one basis. The
cash redemption amount per unit is based on the market price of
our common stock at the time of redemption. The number of shares
of common stock issuable upon redemption of limited partnership
interests held by limited partners may be adjusted upon the
occurrence of certain events such as share dividends, share
subdivisions or combinations. We expect to fund any cash
redemptions out of available cash or borrowings. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, a limited partner will not be
149
Operating
partnership and the partnership agreement
entitled to exercise its redemption rights if the delivery of
common stock to the redeeming limited partner would:
|
|
Ø
|
result in any person owning, directly or indirectly, common
stocks in excess of the stock ownership limit in our charter;
|
|
Ø
|
result in our common stock being owned by fewer than
100 persons (determined without reference to any rules of
attribution);
|
|
Ø
|
result in our being closely held within the meaning
of Section 856(h) of the Code;
|
|
Ø
|
cause us to own, actually or constructively, 10% or more of the
ownership interests in a tenant (other than a TRS) of ours, the
operating partnerships or a subsidiary partnerships
real property, within the meaning of Section 856(d)(2)(B)
of the Code;
|
|
Ø
|
cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT under the Code, including,
but not limited to, as a result of any management company that
operates a health care property failing to qualify as an
eligible independent contractor under the Code; or
|
|
Ø
|
cause the acquisition of common stock by such redeeming limited
partner to be integrated with any other distribution
of common stock for purposes of complying with the registration
provisions of the Securities Act.
|
We may, in our sole and absolute discretion, waive any of these
restrictions.
The partnership agreement will require that the operating
partnership be operated in a manner that enables us to satisfy
the requirements for being classified as a REIT, to avoid any
federal income or excise tax liability imposed by the Code
(other than any federal income tax liability associated with our
retained capital gains) and to ensure that the partnership will
not be classified as a publicly traded partnership
taxable as a corporation under Section 7704 of the Code.
In addition to the administrative and operating costs and
expenses incurred by the operating partnership, the operating
partnership generally will pay all of our administrative costs
and expenses, including:
|
|
Ø
|
all expenses relating to our continuity of existence and our
subsidiaries operations;
|
|
Ø
|
all expenses relating to offerings and registration of
securities;
|
|
Ø
|
all expenses associated with the preparation and filing of any
of our periodic or other reports and communications under
federal, state or local laws or regulations;
|
|
Ø
|
all expenses associated with our compliance with laws, rules and
regulations promulgated by any regulatory body; and
|
|
Ø
|
all of our other operating or administrative costs incurred in
the ordinary course of business on behalf of the operating
partnership.
|
These expenses, however, do not include any of our
administrative and operating costs and expenses incurred that
are attributable to health care properties that are owned by us
directly rather than by the operating partnership or its
subsidiaries.
FIDUCIARY
RESPONSIBILITIES
Our directors and officers have duties under applicable Maryland
law to manage us in a manner consistent with the best interests
of our stockholders. At the same time, we, as the general
partner of our operating partnership, will have fiduciary duties
to manage our operating partnership in a manner beneficial to
our operating partnership and its partners. Our duties, as
general partner to our operating partnership and its limited
partners, therefore, may come into conflict with the duties of
our directors
150
Operating
partnership and the partnership agreement
and officers to our stockholders. We will be under no obligation
to give priority to the separate interests of the limited
partners of our operating partnership or our stockholders in
deciding whether to cause the operating partnership to take or
decline to take any actions.
The limited partners of our operating partnership expressly will
acknowledge that as the general partner of our operating
partnership, we are acting for the benefit of the operating
partnership, the limited partners and our stockholders
collectively.
DISTRIBUTIONS
The partnership agreement will provide that the operating
partnership will distribute cash from operations (including net
sale or refinancing proceeds, but excluding net proceeds from
the sale of the operating partnerships property in
connection with the liquidation of the operating partnership) at
such time and in such amounts as determined by us in our sole
discretion, to us and the limited partners in accordance with
their respective percentage interests in the operating
partnership.
Upon liquidation of the operating partnership, after payment of,
or adequate provision for, debts and obligations of the
partnership, including any partner loans, any remaining assets
of the partnership will be distributed to us and the limited
partners with positive capital accounts in accordance with their
respective positive capital account balances.
LTIP
UNITS
In general, LTIP units are a class of partnership units in our
operating partnership and will receive the same quarterly per
unit distributions as the other outstanding OP units in our
operating partnership. Initially, each LTIP unit will have a
capital account balance of zero and, therefore, will not have
full parity with OP units with respect to liquidating
distributions. However, the operating partnership agreement
provides that book gain, or economic appreciation,
in our assets realized by our operating partnership as a result
of the actual sale of all or substantially all of our operating
partnerships assets or the revaluation of our operating
partnerships assets as provided by applicable
U.S. Department of Treasury regulations, or Treasury
Regulations, will be allocated first to the LTIP unit holders
until the capital account per LTIP unit is equal to the average
capital account
per-unit
of
the general partners OP units in our operating
partnership. The partnership agreement provides that our
operating partnerships assets will be revalued upon the
occurrence of certain events, specifically additional capital
contributions by us or other partners, the redemption of a
partnership interest, a liquidation (as defined in the Treasury
Regulations) of our operating partnership or the issuance of a
partnership interest (including LTIP units) to a new or existing
partner as consideration for the provision of services to, or
for the benefit of, our operating partnership.
Upon equalization of the capital accounts of the LTIP unit
holders with the average
per-unit
capital account of our OP units, the LTIP units will achieve
full parity with the OP units for all purposes, including with
respect to liquidating distributions. If such parity is reached,
vested LTIP units may be converted into an equal number of OP
units at any time, and thereafter enjoy all the rights of OP
units. If a sale or revaluation of assets occurs at a time when
our operating partnerships assets have appreciated
sufficiently since the last revaluation, the LTIP units would
achieve full parity with the OP units upon such sale or
revaluation. In the absence of sufficient appreciation in the
value of our operating partnerships assets at the time of
a sale or revaluation, full parity would not be reached.
Consequently, an LTIP unit may never become convertible because
the value of our operating partnerships assets has not
appreciated sufficiently between revaluation dates to equalize
capital accounts. Until and unless parity is reached, the value
for a given number of vested LTIP units will be less than the
value of an equal number of our shares of common stock.
151
Operating
partnership and the partnership agreement
ALLOCATIONS
Profits and losses of the partnership (including depreciation
and amortization deductions) for each fiscal year generally will
be allocated to us and the other limited partners in accordance
with the respective percentage interests in the partnership.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, our operating partnership will
allocate gain on the sale of all or substantially all of its
assets first to holders of LTIP units, and will, upon the
occurrence of certain specified events, revalue its assets with
any net increase in valuation allocated first to the LTIP units,
in each case to equalize the capital accounts of such holders
with the average capital account per unit of the general
partners OP units. All of the foregoing allocations are
subject to compliance with the provisions of
Sections 704(b) and 704(c) of the Code and Treasury
Regulations promulgated thereunder. To the extent Treasury
Regulations promulgated pursuant to Section 704(c) of the
Code permit, we, as the general partner, shall have the
authority to elect the method to be used by the operating
partnership for allocating items with respect to contributed
property acquired in connection with this offering for which
fair market value differs from the adjusted tax basis at the
time of contribution, and such election shall be binding on all
partners.
TERM
The operating partnership will continue indefinitely, or until
sooner dissolved upon:
|
|
Ø
|
our bankruptcy, dissolution, removal or withdrawal (unless the
limited partners elect to continue the partnership);
|
|
Ø
|
the passage of 90 days after the sale or other disposition
of all or substantially all of the assets of the partnership;
|
|
Ø
|
the redemption of all partnership units (other than those held
by us, if any); or
|
|
Ø
|
an election by us in our capacity as the general partner.
|
REGISTRATION
RIGHTS
Our operating partnerships limited partners (other than us
and our subsidiaries) will have the right to require our
operating partnership to redeem part or all of their OP units
for cash, or, at our election, shares of our common stock. We
have granted registration rights to those persons who will
receive shares of our common stock issuable upon redemption of
OP units. These registration rights require us to seek to
register all such shares of our common stock approximately 12
months after issuance of such OP units. Our operating
partnership will bear expenses incident to these registration
requirements. However, neither we nor the operating partnership
will bear the costs of (1) any underwriting discounts or
commissions or (2) any fees or expenses incurred by holders
of such shares of our common stock in connection with such
registration that we or the operating partnership are not
permitted to pay according to the rules of any regulatory
authority.
TAX
MATTERS
Our partnership agreement will provide that we, as the sole
general partner of the operating partnership, will be the tax
matters partner of the operating partnership and, as such, will
have authority to handle tax audits and to make tax elections
under the Code on behalf of the operating partnership.
152
Material federal
income tax considerations
This section summarizes the material federal income tax
considerations that you, as a stockholder, may consider
relevant. Hunton & Williams LLP has acted as our
counsel, has reviewed this summary, and is of the opinion that
the discussion contained herein is accurate in all material
respects. Because this section is a summary, it does not address
all aspects of taxation that may be relevant to particular
stockholders in light of their personal investment or tax
circumstances, or to certain types of stockholders that are
subject to special treatment under the federal income tax laws,
such as:
|
|
Ø
|
insurance companies;
|
|
Ø
|
tax-exempt organizations (except to the limited extent discussed
in Taxation of Tax-Exempt Stockholders below);
|
|
Ø
|
financial institutions or broker-dealers;
|
|
Ø
|
non-U.S. individuals
and foreign corporations (except to the limited extent discussed
in Taxation of
Non-U.S. Stockholders
below);
|
|
Ø
|
U.S. expatriates;
|
|
Ø
|
persons who
mark-to-market
our common stock;
|
|
Ø
|
subchapter S corporations;
|
|
Ø
|
U.S. stockholders (as defined below) whose functional
currency is not the U.S. dollar;
|
|
Ø
|
regulated investment companies and REITs;
|
|
Ø
|
trusts and estates;
|
|
Ø
|
holders who receive our common stock through the exercise of
employee stock options or otherwise as compensation;
|
|
Ø
|
persons holding our common stock as part of a
straddle, hedge, conversion
transaction, synthetic security or other
integrated investment;
|
|
Ø
|
persons subject to the alternative minimum tax provisions of the
Code; and
|
|
Ø
|
persons holding our common stock through a partnership or
similar pass-through entity.
|
This summary assumes that stockholders hold shares as capital
assets for federal income tax purposes, which generally means
property held for investment.
The statements in this section are based on the current federal
income tax laws, are for general information purposes only and
are not tax advice. We cannot assure you that new laws,
interpretations of law, or court decisions, any of which may
take effect retroactively, will not cause any statement in this
section to be inaccurate.
WE URGE YOU TO CONSULT YOUR TAX ADVISOR REGARDING THE
SPECIFIC TAX CONSEQUENCES TO YOU OF THE PURCHASE, OWNERSHIP AND
SALE OF OUR COMMON STOCK AND OF OUR ELECTION TO BE TAXED AS A
REIT. SPECIFICALLY, YOU SHOULD CONSULT YOUR TAX ADVISOR
REGARDING THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, FOREIGN, AND OTHER TAX
CONSEQUENCES OF SUCH PURCHASE, OWNERSHIP, SALE AND ELECTION, AND
REGARDING POTENTIAL CHANGES IN APPLICABLE TAX LAWS.
TAXATION OF OUR
COMPANY
We currently have in effect an election to be taxed as a
pass-through entity under subchapter S of the Code, but intend
to revoke our S election prior to the closing date of this
offering. We intend to elect to
153
Material federal
income tax considerations
be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes commencing
with our short taxable year ending December 31, 2010. We
believe that, commencing with such short taxable year, we will
be organized and will operate in such a manner as to qualify for
taxation as a REIT under the federal income tax laws, and we
intend to continue to operate in such a manner, but no
assurances can be given that we will operate in a manner so as
to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT. This section discusses
the laws governing the federal income tax treatment of a REIT
and its stockholders. These laws are highly technical and
complex.
In connection with this offering, Hunton & Williams
LLP is rendering an opinion that, commencing with our short
taxable year beginning on the business day prior to the closing
of this offering and ending on December 31, 2010, we will
be organized in conformity with the requirements for
qualification and taxation as a REIT under the federal income
tax laws, and our proposed method of operations will enable us
to satisfy the requirements for qualification and taxation as a
REIT under the federal income tax laws for our taxable year
ending December 31, 2010 and thereafter. Investors should
be aware that Hunton & Williams LLPs opinion is
based upon customary assumptions, is conditioned upon certain
representations made by us as to factual matters, including
representations regarding the nature of our assets and the
conduct of our business, is not binding upon the IRS, or any
court, and speaks as of the date issued. In addition,
Hunton & Williams LLPs opinion is based on
existing federal income tax law governing qualification as a
REIT, which is subject to change either prospectively or
retroactively. Moreover, our qualification and taxation as a
REIT depend upon our ability to meet on a continuing basis,
through actual annual operating results, certain qualification
tests set forth in the federal tax laws. Those qualification
tests involve the percentage of income that we earn from
specified sources, the percentage of our assets that falls
within specified categories, the diversity of ownership of our
shares of common stock, and the percentage of our earnings that
we distribute. Hunton & Williams LLP will not review
our compliance with those tests on a continuing basis. As
described more fully below under Taxable REIT
Subsidiaries and Gross Income Tests,
upon completion of this offering, we intend to request a private
letter ruling from the IRS substantially to the effect that
(i) five of our initial properties will be treated as
qualified health care properties, making them
eligible to be leased to our TRS lessee and (ii) with
respect to our initial properties located in the State of New
York, that certain powers our TRS lessee will be required to
retain under healthcare regulations issued by the State of New
York will not cause our TRS lessee to be considered to operate
or manage a health care facility. We have not received, and do
not expect to seek, a private letter ruling from the IRS on any
other issue. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that our
actual results of operations for any particular taxable year
will satisfy such requirements. Hunton & Williams
LLPs opinion does not foreclose the possibility that we
may have to use one or more of the REIT savings provisions
discussed below, which could require us to pay an excise or
penalty tax (which could be material) in order for us to
maintain our REIT qualification. For a discussion of the tax
consequences of our failure to qualify as a REIT, see
Failure to Qualify.
If we qualify as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to
federal income tax on the taxable income that we distribute to
our stockholders. The benefit of that tax treatment is that it
avoids the double taxation, or taxation at both the
corporate and stockholder levels, that generally results from
owning stock in a corporation. However, we will be subject to
federal tax in the following circumstances:
|
|
Ø
|
We will pay federal income tax on any taxable income, including
undistributed net capital gain, that we do not distribute to
stockholders during, or within a specified time period after,
the calendar year in which the income is earned.
|
|
Ø
|
We may be subject to the alternative minimum tax on
any items of tax preference including any deductions of net
operating losses.
|
154
Material federal
income tax considerations
|
|
Ø
|
We will pay income tax at the highest corporate rate on:
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
net income from the sale or other disposition of property
acquired through foreclosure (foreclosure property)
that we hold primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary
course of business, and
|
|
|
-
|
other non-qualifying income from foreclosure property.
|
|
|
Ø
|
We will pay a 100% tax on net income from sales or other
dispositions of property, other than foreclosure property, that
we hold primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course
of business.
|
|
Ø
|
If we fail to satisfy one or both of the 75% gross income test
or the 95% gross income test, as described below under
Gross Income Tests, and nonetheless continue
to qualify as a REIT because we meet other requirements, we will
pay a 100% tax on:
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
the gross income attributable to the greater of the amount by
which we fail the 75% gross income test or the 95% gross income
test, in either case, multiplied by
|
|
|
-
|
a fraction intended to reflect our profitability.
|
|
|
Ø
|
If we fail to distribute during a calendar year at least the sum
of (1) 85% of our REIT ordinary income for the year,
(2) 95% of our REIT capital gain net income for the year,
and (3) any undistributed taxable income required to be
distributed from earlier periods, we will pay a 4% nondeductible
excise tax on the excess of the required distribution over the
amount we actually distributed.
|
|
Ø
|
We may elect to retain and pay income tax on our net long-term
capital gain. In that case, a stockholder would be taxed on its
proportionate share of our undistributed long-term capital gain
(to the extent that we made a timely designation of such gain to
the stockholders) and would receive a credit or refund for its
proportionate share of the tax we paid.
|
|
Ø
|
We will be subject to a 100% excise tax on transactions with a
TRS that are not conducted on an arms-length basis.
|
|
Ø
|
In the event of a failure of any of the asset tests, other than
a de minimis failure of the 5% asset test or the 10% vote or
value test, as described below under Asset
Tests, as long as the failure was due to reasonable cause
and not to willful neglect, we file a description of each asset
that caused such failure with the IRS, and we dispose of the
assets or otherwise comply with the asset tests within six
months after the last day of the quarter in which we identify
such failure, we will pay a tax equal to the greater of $50,000
or the highest federal income tax rate then applicable to
U.S. corporations (currently 35%) on the net income from
the nonqualifying assets during the period in which we failed to
satisfy the asset tests.
|
|
Ø
|
In the event we fail to satisfy one or more requirements for
REIT qualification, other than the gross income tests and the
asset tests, and such failure is due to reasonable cause and not
to willful neglect, we will be required to pay a penalty of
$50,000 for each such failure.
|
|
Ø
|
If we acquire any asset from a C corporation, or a corporation
that generally is subject to full corporate-level tax, in a
merger or other transaction in which we acquire a basis in the
asset that is determined by reference either to the C
corporations basis in the asset or to another asset, we
will pay tax at the highest regular corporate rate applicable if
we recognize gain on the sale or disposition of the asset during
the
10-year
period after we acquire the asset provided no election is made
for the transaction to be taxable on a current basis. The amount
of gain on which we will pay tax is the lesser of:
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
the amount of gain that we recognize at the time of the sale or
disposition, and
|
|
|
-
|
the amount of gain that we would have recognized if we had sold
the asset at the time we acquired it.
|
|
|
Ø
|
We may be required to pay monetary penalties to the IRS in
certain circumstances, including if we fail to meet
record-keeping requirements intended to monitor our compliance
with rules relating to the composition of a REITs
stockholders, as described below in Recordkeeping
Requirements.
|
155
Material federal
income tax considerations
|
|
Ø
|
The earnings of our lower-tier entities that are subchapter C
corporations, including our TRS lessee and any other TRSs we
form in the future, will be subject to federal corporate income
tax.
|
In addition, notwithstanding our qualification as a REIT, we may
also have to pay certain state and local income taxes, because
not all states and localities treat REITs in the same manner
that they are treated for federal income tax purposes. Moreover,
as further described below, TRSs will be subject to federal,
state and local corporate income tax on their taxable income.
REQUIREMENTS FOR
QUALIFICATION
A REIT is a corporation, trust, or association that meets each
of the following requirements:
1. It is managed by one or more directors or
directors.
2. Its beneficial ownership is evidenced by
transferable shares, or by transferable certificates of
beneficial interest.
3. It would be taxable as a domestic corporation, but
for the REIT provisions of the federal income tax laws.
4. It is neither a financial institution nor an
insurance company subject to special provisions of the federal
income tax laws.
5. At least 100 persons are beneficial owners of
its shares or ownership certificates.
6. Not more than 50% in value of its outstanding
shares or ownership certificates is owned, directly or
indirectly, by five or fewer individuals, which the Code defines
to include certain entities, during the last half of any taxable
year.
7. It elects to be a REIT, or has made such election
for a previous taxable year, and satisfies all relevant filing
and other administrative requirements established by the IRS
that must be met to elect and maintain REIT status.
8. It meets certain other qualification tests,
described below, regarding the nature of its income and assets
and the amount of its distributions to stockholders.
9. It uses a calendar year for federal income tax
purposes and complies with the recordkeeping requirements of the
federal income tax laws.
We must meet requirements 1 through 4, 7, 8 and 9 during our
entire taxable year and must meet requirement 5 during at least
335 days of a taxable year of 12 months, or during a
proportionate part of a taxable year of less than
12 months. Requirements 5 and 6 will apply to us beginning
with our 2011 taxable year. If we comply with all the
requirements for ascertaining the ownership of our outstanding
shares in a taxable year and have no reason to know that we
violated requirement 6, we will be deemed to have satisfied
requirement 6 for that taxable year. For purposes of determining
share ownership under requirement 6, an individual
generally includes a supplemental unemployment compensation
benefits plan, a private foundation, or a portion of a trust
permanently set aside or used exclusively for charitable
purposes. An individual, however, generally does not
include a trust that is a qualified employee pension or profit
sharing trust under the federal income tax laws, and
beneficiaries of such a trust will be treated as holding our
shares in proportion to their actuarial interests in the trust
for purposes of requirement 6.
Our charter provides restrictions regarding the transfer and
ownership of shares of our capital stock. See Description
of SecuritiesRestrictions on Ownership and Transfer.
We believe that we will issue sufficient stock with sufficient
diversity of ownership to allow us to satisfy requirements 5 and
6 above. The restrictions in our charter are intended (among
other things) to assist us in continuing to satisfy
156
Material federal
income tax considerations
requirements 5 and 6 described above. These restrictions,
however, may not ensure that we will, in all cases, be able to
satisfy such share ownership requirements. If we fail to satisfy
these share ownership requirements, our qualification as a REIT
may terminate.
In addition, we must satisfy all relevant filing and other
administrative requirements established by the IRS that must be
met to elect and maintain REIT status and comply with the
record-keeping requirements of the Code and regulations
promulgated thereunder.
Qualified REIT Subsidiaries.
A corporation
that is a qualified REIT subsidiary is not treated
as a corporation separate from its parent REIT. All assets,
liabilities, and items of income, deduction, and credit of a
qualified REIT subsidiary are treated as assets,
liabilities, and items of income, deduction, and credit of the
REIT. A qualified REIT subsidiary is a corporation,
other than a TRS, all of the stock of which is owned by the
REIT. Thus, in applying the requirements described herein, any
qualified REIT subsidiary that we own will be
ignored, and all assets, liabilities, and items of income,
deduction, and credit of such subsidiary will be treated as our
assets, liabilities, and items of income, deduction, and credit.
Other Disregarded Entities and
Partnerships.
An unincorporated domestic entity,
such as a partnership or limited liability company that has a
single owner, generally is not treated as an entity separate
from its parent for federal income tax purposes. An
unincorporated domestic entity with two or more owners is
generally treated as a partnership for federal income tax
purposes. In the case of a REIT that is a partner in a
partnership that has other partners, the REIT is treated as
owning its proportionate share of the assets of the partnership
and as earning its allocable share of the gross income of the
partnership for purposes of the applicable REIT qualification
tests. Our proportionate share for purposes of the 10% value
test (see Asset Tests) will be based on our
proportionate interest in the equity interests and certain debt
securities issued by the partnership. For all of the other asset
and income tests, our proportionate share will be based on our
proportionate interest in the capital interests in the
partnership. Our proportionate share of the assets, liabilities,
and items of income of any partnership, joint venture, or
limited liability company that is treated as a partnership for
federal income tax purposes in which we acquire an equity
interest, directly or indirectly, will be treated as our assets
and gross income for purposes of applying the various REIT
qualification requirements.
Taxable REIT Subsidiaries.
A REIT may own up
to 100% of the shares of one or more TRSs. A TRS is a fully
taxable corporation that may earn income that would not be
qualifying income if earned directly by the parent REIT. The
subsidiary and the REIT must jointly elect to treat the
subsidiary as a TRS. A corporation of which a TRS directly or
indirectly owns more than 35% of the voting power or value of
the securities will automatically be treated as a TRS. We are
not treated as holding the assets of a TRS or as receiving any
income that the subsidiary earns. Rather, the stock issued by a
TRS to us is an asset in our hands, and we treat the
distributions paid to us from such taxable subsidiary, if any,
as income. This treatment can affect our compliance with the
gross income and asset tests. Because we do not include the
assets and income of TRSs in determining our compliance with the
REIT requirements, we may use such entities to undertake
indirectly activities that the REIT rules might otherwise
preclude us from doing directly or through pass-through
subsidiaries. Overall, no more than 25% of the value of a
REITs assets may consist of stock or securities of one or
more TRSs.
A TRS will pay income tax at regular corporate rates on any
income that it earns. In addition, the TRS rules limit the
deductibility of interest paid or accrued by a TRS to its parent
REIT to assure that the TRS is subject to an appropriate level
of corporate taxation. Further, the rules impose a 100% excise
tax on transactions between a TRS and its parent REIT or the
REITs tenants that are not conducted on an
arms-length basis.
A TRS may not directly or indirectly operate or manage any
health care facilities or lodging facilities or provide rights
to any brand name under which any health care facility or
lodging facility is operated. A
157
Material federal
income tax considerations
TRS may provide rights to any brand name under which any health
care facility or lodging facility is operated if such rights are
provided to an eligible independent contractor (as
described below) to operate or manage a health care facility or
lodging facility if such rights are held by the TRS as a
franchisee, licensee, or in a similar capacity and such health
care facility or lodging facility is either owned by the TRS or
leased to the TRS by its parent REIT. A TRS will not be
considered to operate or manage a qualified health care
property or qualified lodging facility solely
because the TRS directly or indirectly possesses a license,
permit, or similar instrument enabling it to do so.
Additionally, a TRS that employs individuals working at a
qualified health care property or qualified
lodging facility outside of the United States will not be
considered to operate or manage a qualified health care
property or qualified lodging facility, as
long as an eligible independent contractor is
responsible for the daily supervision and direction of such
individuals on behalf of the TRS pursuant to a management
agreement or similar service contract.
Rent that we receive from our TRS lessee will qualify as
rents from real property as long as the property is
a qualified health care property and is operated on
behalf of such TRS lessee by a person who qualifies as an
independent contractor and who is, or is related to
a person who is, actively engaged in the trade or business of
operating qualified health care properties for any
person unrelated to us and such TRS lessee (an eligible
independent contractor). A qualified health care
property includes any real property and any personal
property that is, or is necessary or incidental to the use of, a
hospital, nursing facility, assisted living facility, congregate
care facility, qualified continuing care facility, or other
licensed facility which extends medical or nursing or ancillary
services to patients and which is operated by a provider of such
services which is eligible for participation in the Medicare
program with respect to such facility. Our assisted living,
Alzheimers care, and skilled nursing facilities will
generally be treated as qualified health care
properties. Our independent living facilities and
continuing care retirement communities may be treated as
qualified health care properties.
One of the initial properties we have under contract contains
solely assisted living units, and consequently, will constitute
a qualified health care property. With respect to
the remaining five initial properties, four are senior housing
facilities containing both independent living and assisted
living units housed in the same building and one is a senior
housing facility containing both independent living and assisted
living units housed on the same campus, in each case with a
majority of the units constituting independent living units.
While we believe these independent living facilities should be
treated as qualified health care properties under
current law, it is unclear whether such facilities will
constitute qualified health care properties.
Consequently, we intend to initially lease our initial
properties to affiliates of Senior Lifestyle Management, the
management company that currently operates those facilities, and
we intend to request a private letter ruling from the IRS
holding that (i) our initial properties constitute
qualified health care properties and (ii) with
respect to our initial properties located in the State of New
York, that certain powers our TRS lessee will be required to
retain under healthcare regulations issued by the State of New
York will not cause our TRS lessee to be considered to operate
or manage a health care facility. If we receive such a ruling
and the regulatory approvals required to transfer the operating
licenses for the facilities in our initial portfolio to our TRS
lessee, we will subsequently lease our initial properties to our
TRS lessee and our TRS lessee will enter into management
agreements with the management company that currently operates
those properties. There can be no assurance that the IRS will
issue such a private letter ruling to us. Additionally, we would
be entitled to rely upon that private letter ruling only to the
extent that we did not misstate or omit a material fact in the
ruling request we submit to the IRS and that we operate in the
future in accordance with the material facts described in that
request. Moreover, the IRS, in its sole discretion, may revoke a
private letter ruling. If, despite a private letter ruling, the
IRS were to determine that any of our initial properties are not
qualified health care properties and we have leased
those properties to our TRS lessee, the rents from those
properties would not be treated as qualifying income for the 75%
and 95% gross income tests, which could cause us to fail to
qualify as a REIT.
158
Material federal
income tax considerations
Additionally, we generally intend to lease certain of our
assisted living, Alzheimers/dementia care, skilled nursing
facilities and continuing care retirement communities to our TRS
lessee, but we may use traditional net lease structures for some
of these facilities even though they are eligible for the TRS
lessee structure. Our TRS lessee will engage one or more
independent, third-party health care managers to operate those
properties on its behalf. We believe all those managers will
qualify as eligible independent contractors. In the
case of facilities that do not constitute qualified health
care properties, we may lease the units in those
facilities directly to the residents and form a TRS to provide
services to those residents.
GROSS INCOME
TESTS
We must satisfy two gross income tests annually to maintain our
qualification as a REIT. First, at least 75% of our gross income
for each taxable year must consist of defined types of income
that we derive, directly or indirectly, from investments
relating to real property or mortgages on real property or
qualified temporary investment income. Qualifying income for
purposes of that 75% gross income test generally includes:
|
|
Ø
|
rents from real property;
|
|
Ø
|
interest on debt secured by mortgages on real property, or on
interests in real property;
|
|
Ø
|
dividends or other distributions on, and gain from the sale of,
shares in other REITs;
|
|
Ø
|
gain from the sale of real estate assets; and
|
|
Ø
|
income derived from the temporary investment of new capital that
is attributable to the issuance of our stock or a public
offering of our debt with a maturity date of at least five years
and that we receive during the one-year period beginning on the
date on which we received such new capital.
|
Second, in general, at least 95% of our gross income for each
taxable year must consist of income that is qualifying income
for purposes of the 75% gross income test, other types of
interest and dividends, gain from the sale or disposition of
shares or securities, or any combination of these. Gross income
from our sale of property that we hold primarily for sale to
customers in the ordinary course of business is excluded from
both the numerator and the denominator in both gross income
tests. In addition, income and gain from hedging
transactions that we enter into to hedge indebtedness
incurred or to be incurred to acquire or carry real estate
assets and that are clearly and timely identified as such will
be excluded from both the numerator and the denominator for
purposes of the 75% and 95% gross income tests. In addition,
certain foreign currency gains will be excluded from gross
income for purposes of one or both of the gross income tests.
See Foreign Currency Gain. The following
paragraphs discuss the specific application of the gross income
tests to us.
Rents from Real Property.
Rent that we receive
from our real property will qualify as rents from real
property, which is qualifying income for purposes of the
75% and 95% gross income tests, only if the following conditions
are met:
|
|
Ø
|
First, the rent must not be based, in whole or in part, on the
income or profits of any person, but may be based on a fixed
percentage or percentages of receipts or sales.
|
|
Ø
|
Second, neither we nor a direct or indirect owner of 10% or more
of our stock may own, actually constructively, 10% or more of a
tenant from whom we receive rent, other than a TRS. If the
tenant is a TRS, such TRS may not directly or indirectly operate
or manage the related property. Instead, the property must be
operated on behalf of the TRS by a person who qualifies as an
independent contractor and who is, or is related to
a person who is, actively engaged in the trade or business of
operating health care facilities for any person unrelated to us
and the TRS. See Taxable REIT Subsidiaries.
|
|
Ø
|
Third, if the rent attributable to personal property leased in
connection with a lease of real property is 15% or less of the
total rent received under the lease, then the rent attributable
to personal
|
159
Material federal
income tax considerations
|
|
|
property will qualify as rents from real property. However, if
the 15% threshold is exceeded, the rent attributable to personal
property will not qualify as rents from real property.
|
|
|
Ø
|
Fourth, we generally must not operate or manage our real
property or furnish or render services to our tenants, other
than through an independent contractor who is
adequately compensated and from whom we do not derive revenue.
However, we need not provide services through an
independent contractor, but instead may provide
services directly to our tenants, if the services are
usually or customarily rendered in connection with
the rental of space for occupancy only and are not considered to
be provided for the tenants convenience. In addition, we
may provide a minimal amount of noncustomary
services to the tenants of a property, other than through an
independent contractor, as long as our income from the services
(valued at not less than 150% of our direct cost of performing
such services) does not exceed 1% of our income from the related
property. Furthermore, we may own up to 100% of the stock of a
TRS which may provide customary and noncustomary services to our
tenants without tainting our rental income for the related
properties. See Taxable REIT Subsidiaries.
|
Our operating partnership and its subsidiaries will lease
certain of our assisted living, Alzheimers/dementia care,
skilled nursing facilities and continuing care retirement
communities under percentage leases to our TRS lessee. Under our
percentage leases, our TRS lessee will pay base rent plus a
percentage rent based on the gross income of the property. Our
operating partnership and its subsidiaries will lease certain of
our senior housing facilities to third-party facility operators
pursuant to long-term net leases that provide for base rent plus
percentage rent based on gross revenues. The determination of
whether our leases are true leases depends on an analysis of all
the surrounding facts and circumstances. In making such a
determination, courts have considered a variety of factors,
including the following:
|
|
Ø
|
the intent of the parties;
|
|
Ø
|
the form of the agreement;
|
|
Ø
|
the degree of control over the property that is retained by the
property owner (for example, whether the lessee has substantial
control over the operation of the property or whether the lessee
was required simply to use its best efforts to perform its
obligations under the agreement); and
|
|
Ø
|
the extent to which the property owner retains the risk of loss
with respect to the property (for example, whether the lessee
bears the risk of increases in operating expenses or the risk of
damage to the property) or the potential for economic gain with
respect to the property.
|
In addition, the federal income tax law provides that a contract
that purports to be a service contract or a partnership
agreement is treated instead as a lease of property if the
contract is properly treated as such, taking into account all
relevant factors. Since the determination of whether a service
contract should be treated as a lease is inherently factual, the
presence or absence of any single factor may not be dispositive
in every case.
We currently intend to structure our leases so that they qualify
as true leases for federal income tax purposes. For example,
with respect to each lease, we generally expect that:
|
|
Ø
|
our operating partnership and the lessee will intend for their
relationship to be that of a lessor and lessee, and such
relationship will be documented by a lease agreement;
|
|
Ø
|
the lessee will have the right to exclusive possession and use
and quiet enjoyment of the health care properties covered by the
lease during the term of the lease;
|
|
Ø
|
the lessee will bear the cost of, and will be responsible for,
day-to-day
maintenance and repair of the senior housing facilities other
than the cost of certain capital expenditures, and dictate,
either directly or through third party operators that are
eligible independent contractors who will work for the lessee
during the term of the lease, how the health care properties
will be operated and maintained;
|
160
Material federal
income tax considerations
|
|
Ø
|
the lessee will generally bear the costs and expenses of
operating the health care properties, including the cost of any
inventory used in their operation, during the term of the lease;
|
|
Ø
|
the lessee will benefit from any savings and bear the burdens of
any increases in the costs of operating the health care
properties during the term of the lease;
|
|
Ø
|
in the event of damage or destruction to a health care
properties, the lessee will be at economic risk because it will
bear the economic burden of the loss in income from operation of
the health care properties subject to the right, in certain
circumstances, to terminate the lease if the lessor does not
restore the property to its prior condition;
|
|
Ø
|
the lessee will generally have indemnified the lessor against
all liabilities imposed on the lessor during the term of the
lease by reason of (1) injury to persons or damage to
property occurring at the health care properties, (2) the
lessees use, management, maintenance or repair of the
health care properties, (3) taxes and assessments in
respect of the health care properties that are obligations of
the lessee, (4) any breach of the lease by the lessee, and
(5) the nonperformance of contractual obligations of the
lessee with respect to the health care properties;
|
|
Ø
|
the lessee will be obligated to pay, at a minimum, material base
rent for the period of use of the health care properties under
the lease;
|
|
Ø
|
the lessee will stand to incur substantial losses or reap
substantial gains depending on how successfully they, either
directly or through the eligible independent contractors,
operate the health care properties;
|
|
Ø
|
we expect that each lease that we enter into, at the time we
enter into it (or at any time that any such lease is
subsequently renewed or extended) will enable the applicable
lessee to derive a meaningful profit, after expenses and taking
into account the risks associated with the lease, from the
operation of the health care properties during the term of its
lease; and
|
|
Ø
|
upon termination of each lease, the applicable health care
property will be expected to have a substantial remaining useful
life and substantial remaining fair market value.
|
Investors should be aware that there are no controlling Treasury
Regulations, published rulings or judicial decisions involving
leases with terms substantially the same as our anticipated
leases that discuss whether such leases constitute true leases
for federal income tax purposes. We intend to enter into leases
that will be treated as true leases. If our leases are
characterized as service contracts or partnership agreements,
rather than as true leases, part or all of the payments that our
operating partnership and its subsidiaries receive from our
percentage and other leases may not be considered rent or may
not otherwise satisfy the various requirements for qualification
as rents from real property. In that case, we likely
would not be able to satisfy either the 75% or 95% gross income
test and, as a result, would lose our REIT status unless we
qualify for relief, as described below under Failure
to Satisfy Gross Income Tests.
As described above, in order for the rent that we receive to
constitute rents from real property, several other
requirements must be satisfied. One requirement is that
percentage rent must not be based in whole or in part on the
income or profits of any person. Percentage rent, however, will
qualify as rents from real property if it is based
on percentages of receipts or sales and the percentages:
|
|
Ø
|
are fixed at the time the percentage leases are entered into;
|
|
Ø
|
are not renegotiated during the term of the percentage leases in
a manner that has the effect of basing percentage rent on income
or profits; and
|
|
Ø
|
conform with normal business practice.
|
More generally, percentage rent will not qualify as rents
from real property if, considering the leases and all the
surrounding circumstances, the arrangement does not conform with
normal business practice, but is in reality used as a means of
basing the percentage rent on income or profits.
161
Material federal
income tax considerations
Second, we must not own, actually or constructively, 10% or more
of the shares or the assets or net profits of any lessee (a
related party tenant), other than a TRS. The
constructive ownership rules generally provide that, if 10% or
more in value of our stock is owned, directly or indirectly, by
or for any person, we are considered as owning the shares owned,
directly or indirectly, by or for such person. We anticipate
that all of our senior housing facilities will be leased either
to third parties which do not constitute related party tenants
or to our TRS lessee. In addition, our charter prohibits
transfers of our stock that would cause us to own actually or
constructively, 10% or more of the ownership interests in any
non-TRS lessee. Based on the foregoing, we should never own,
actually or constructively, 10% or more of any lessee other than
a TRS. However, because the constructive ownership rules are
broad and it is not possible to monitor continually direct and
indirect transfers of our stock, no absolute assurance can be
given that such transfers or other events of which we have no
knowledge will not cause us to own constructively 10% or more of
a lessee (or a subtenant, in which case only rent attributable
to the subtenant is disqualified) other than a TRS at some
future date.
As described above, under Requirements for
QualificationTaxable REIT Subsidiaries we may own up
to 100% of the shares of one or more TRSs that may lease
qualified health care properties from us. Rent that
we receive from a TRS will qualify as rents from real
property as long as the qualified health care
property is operated on behalf of the TRS by an
eligible independent contractor.
One of the initial properties we have under contract contains
solely assisted living units, and consequently, will constitute
a qualified health care property. With respect to
the remaining five initial properties, four are senior housing
facilities containing both independent living and assisted
living units housed in the same building and one is a senior
housing facility containing both independent living and assisted
living units housed on the same campus, in each case with a
majority of the units constituting independent living units.
While we believe these independent living facilities should be
treated as qualified health care properties under
current law, it is unclear whether such facilities will
constitute qualified health care properties.
Consequently, we intend to initially lease our initial
properties to an affiliate of Senior Lifestyle Management, the
management company that currently operates those properties, and
we intend to request a private letter ruling from the IRS
holding that (i) our initial properties constitute
qualified health care properties and (ii) with
respect to our initial properties located in the State of New
York, that certain powers our TRS lessee will be required to
retain under healthcare regulations issued by the State of New
York will not cause our TRS lessee to be considered to operate
or manage a health care facility. If we receive such a ruling,
we will subsequently lease our initial properties to our TRS
lessee and our TRS lessee will enter into management agreements
with the management company that currently operates those
properties. There can be no assurance that the IRS will issue
such a private letter ruling to us. Additionally, we would be
entitled to rely upon that private letter ruling only to the
extent that we did not misstate or omit a material fact in the
ruling request we submit to the IRS and that we operate in the
future in accordance with the material facts described in that
request. Moreover, the IRS, in its sole discretion, may revoke a
private letter ruling. If, despite a private letter ruling, the
IRS were to determine that our initial properties are not
qualified health care properties and we have leased
those properties to our TRS lessee, the rents from those
properties would not be treated as qualifying income for
purposes of the 75% and 95% gross income tests, which could
cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT.
We generally intend to lease to our TRS lessee the senior
housing facilities that are treated as qualified health
care properties, but we may use traditional net lease
structures for some of these facilities even though they are
eligible for the TRS lessee structure. Accordingly, our
operating partnership and its subsidiaries will lease certain of
our assisted living, Alzheimers/dementia care, skilled
nursing facilities and continuing care retirement communities
under percentage leases to our TRS lessee. Under our percentage
leases, our TRS lessee will pay base rent plus a percentage rent
based on the gross income of the property. Our TRS lessee will
engage independent, third-party facility operators that qualify
as eligible independent contractors to operate the
related health care facilities on behalf of such TRS
162
Material federal
income tax considerations
lessee. Our operating partnership and its subsidiaries will
lease our senior housing facilities that are not qualified
health care properties to third-party facility operators
under long-term net leases that generally provide for base rent
plus percentage rent based on gross revenues. In addition, in
the case of facilities that do not constitute qualified
health care properties, we may lease the units in those
facilities directly to the residents and form a TRS to provide
services to those residents.
Third, the rent attributable to the personal property leased in
connection with the lease of a health care property must not be
greater than 15% of the total rent received under the lease. The
rent attributable to the personal property contained in a health
care property is the amount that bears the same ratio to total
rent for the taxable year as the average of the fair market
values of the personal property at the beginning and at the end
of the taxable year bears to the average of the aggregate fair
market values of both the real and personal property contained
in the health care property at the beginning and at the end of
such taxable year (the personal property ratio). To
comply with this limitation, a TRS lessee may acquire
furnishings, equipment and other personal property. With respect
to each health care property in which a TRS lessee or the
applicable lessee does not own the personal property, we believe
either that the personal property ratio will be less than 15% or
that any rent attributable to excess personal property will not
jeopardize our ability to qualify as a REIT. There can be no
assurance, however, that the IRS would not challenge our
calculation of a personal property ratio, or that a court would
not uphold such assertion. If such a challenge were successfully
asserted, we could fail to satisfy the 75% or 95% gross income
test and thus potentially lose our REIT status.
Fourth, we cannot furnish or render noncustomary services to the
tenants of our senior housing facilities, or manage or operate
our senior housing facilities, other than through an independent
contractor who is adequately compensated and from whom we do not
derive or receive any income. However, we need not provide
services through an independent contractor, but
instead may provide services directly to our tenants, if the
services are usually or customarily rendered in
connection with the rental of space for occupancy only and are
not considered to be provided for the tenants convenience.
In addition, we may provide a minimal amount of
noncustomary services to the tenants of a property,
other than through an independent contractor, as long as our
income from the services does not exceed 1% of our income from
the related property. Finally, we may own up to 100% of the
shares of one or more TRSs, which may provide noncustomary
services to our tenants without tainting our rents from the
related senior housing facilities. We will not perform any
services other than customary ones for our lessees, unless such
services are provided through independent contractors or TRSs.
If a portion of the rent that we receive from a senior housing
facility does not qualify as rents from real
property because the rent attributable to personal
property exceeds 15% of the total rent for a taxable year, the
portion of the rent that is attributable to personal property
will not be qualifying income for purposes of either the 75% or
95% gross income test. Thus, if such rent attributable to
personal property, plus any other income that is nonqualifying
income for purposes of the 95% gross income test, during a
taxable year exceeds 5% of our gross income during the year, we
would lose our REIT qualification. If, however, the rent from a
particular senior housing facility does not qualify as
rents from real property because either (1) the
percentage rent is considered based on the income or profits of
the related lessee, (2) the lessee either is a related
party tenant or fails to qualify for the exceptions to the
related party tenant rule for qualifying TRSs (including as a
result of a health care property leased to a TRS lessee failing
to qualify as a qualified health care property or an
operator engaged by a TRS lessee to operate a qualified
health care property failing to qualify as an eligible
independent contractor) or (3) we furnish noncustomary
services to the tenants of the senior housing facility, or
manage or operate the senior housing facility, other than
through a qualifying eligible independent contractor engaged by
a TRS, none of the rent from that senior housing facility would
qualify as rents from real property. In that case,
we might lose our REIT qualification because we would be unable
to satisfy either the 75% or 95% gross income test. In addition
to the rent, the lessees are required to pay certain additional
charges. To the extent that such additional charges represent
163
Material federal
income tax considerations
reimbursements of amounts that we are obligated to pay to third
parties, such as a lessees proportionate share of a
propertys operational or capital expenses, such charges
generally will qualify as rents from real property.
To the extent such additional charges represent penalties for
nonpayment or late payment of such amounts, such charges should
qualify as rents from real property. However, to the
extent that late charges do not qualify as rents from real
property, they instead will be treated as interest that
qualifies for the 95% gross income test.
Interest.
The term interest
generally does not include any amount received or accrued,
directly or indirectly, if the determination of such amount
depends in whole or in part on the income or profits of any
person. However, interest generally includes the following:
|
|
Ø
|
an amount that is based on a fixed percentage or percentages of
receipts or sales; and
|
|
Ø
|
an amount that is based on the income or profits of a debtor, as
long as the debtor derives substantially all of its income from
the real property securing the debt from leasing substantially
all of its interest in the property, and only to the extent that
the amounts received by the debtor would be qualifying
rents from real property if received directly by a
REIT.
|
If a loan contains a provision that entitles a REIT to a
percentage of the borrowers gain upon the sale of the real
property securing the loan or a percentage of the appreciation
in the propertys value as of a specific date, income
attributable to that loan provision will be treated as gain from
the sale of the property securing the loan, which generally is
qualifying income for purposes of both gross income tests.
We may invest from time to time in mortgage debt and mezzanine
loans when we believe the investment will allow us to acquire
control of the related asset. Interest on debt secured by a
mortgage on real property or on interests in real property,
including, for this purpose, discount points, prepayment
penalties, loan assumption fees, and late payment charges that
are not compensation for services, generally is qualifying
income for purposes of the 75% gross income test. However, if a
loan is secured by real property and other property and the
highest principal amount of a loan outstanding during a taxable
year exceeds the fair market value of the real property securing
the loan as of the date the REIT agreed to originate or acquire
the loan, a portion of the interest income from such loan will
not be qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income
test, but will be qualifying income for purposes of the 95%
gross income test. The portion of the interest income that will
not be qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income
test will be equal to the interest income attributable to the
portion of the principal amount of the loan that is not secured
by real propertythat is, the amount by which the loan
exceeds the value of the real estate that is security for the
loan.
Mezzanine loans are loans secured by equity interests in an
entity that directly or indirectly owns real property, rather
than by a direct mortgage of the real property. IRS Revenue
Procedure
2003-65
provides a safe harbor pursuant to which a mezzanine loan, if it
meets each of the requirements contained in the Revenue
Procedure, will be treated by the IRS as a real estate asset for
purposes of the REIT asset tests described below, and interest
derived from it will be treated as qualifying mortgage interest
for purposes of the 75% gross income test. Although the Revenue
Procedure provides a safe harbor on which taxpayers may rely, it
does not prescribe rules of substantive tax law. Moreover, we
anticipate that the mezzanine loans we will acquire typically
will not meet all of the requirements for reliance on this safe
harbor. We intend to invest in mezzanine loans in manner that
will enable us to continue to satisfy the gross income and asset
tests.
Dividends.
Our share of any dividends received
from any corporation (including any TRS, but excluding any REIT)
in which we own an equity interest will qualify for purposes of
the 95% gross income test but not for purposes of the 75% gross
income test. Our share of any dividends received from any other
REIT in which we own an equity interest, if any, will be
qualifying income for purposes of both gross income tests.
164
Material federal
income tax considerations
Prohibited Transactions.
A REIT will incur a
100% tax on the net income (including foreign currency gain)
derived from any sale or other disposition of property, other
than foreclosure property, that the REIT holds primarily for
sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business.
We believe that none of our assets will be held primarily for
sale to customers and that a sale of any of our assets will not
be in the ordinary course of our business. Whether a REIT holds
an asset primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary
course of a trade or business depends, however, on the
facts and circumstances in effect from time to time, including
those related to a particular asset. A safe harbor to the
characterization of the sale of property by a REIT as a
prohibited transaction and the 100% prohibited transaction tax
is available if the following requirements are met:
|
|
Ø
|
the REIT has held the property for not less than two years;
|
|
Ø
|
the aggregate expenditures made by the REIT, or any partner of
the REIT, during the two-year period preceding the date of the
sale that are includable in the basis of the property do not
exceed 30% of the selling price of the property;
|
|
Ø
|
either (1) during the year in question, the REIT did not
make more than seven sales of property other than foreclosure
property or sales to which Section 1033 of the Code
applies, (2) the aggregate adjusted bases of all such
properties sold by the REIT during the year did not exceed 10%
of the aggregate bases of all of the assets of the REIT at the
beginning of the year or (3) the aggregate fair market
value of all such properties sold by the REIT during the year
did not exceed 10% of the aggregate fair market value of all of
the assets of the REIT at the beginning of the year;
|
|
Ø
|
in the case of property not acquired through foreclosure or
lease termination, the REIT has held the property for at least
two years for the production of rental income; and
|
|
Ø
|
if the REIT has made more than seven sales of non-foreclosure
property during the taxable year, substantially all of the
marketing and development expenditures with respect to the
property were made through an independent contractor from whom
the REIT derives no income.
|
We will attempt to comply with the terms of safe-harbor
provision in the federal income tax laws prescribing when an
asset sale will not be characterized as a prohibited
transaction. We cannot assure you, however, that we can comply
with the safe-harbor provision or that we will avoid owning
property that may be characterized as property that we hold
primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of
a trade or business. The 100% tax will not apply to gains
from the sale of property that is held through a TRS or other
taxable corporation, although such income will be taxed to the
corporation at regular corporate income tax rates.
Foreclosure Property.
We will be subject to
tax at the maximum corporate rate on any income from foreclosure
property, which includes certain foreign currency gains and
related deductions, other than income that otherwise would be
qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test,
less expenses directly connected with the production of that
income. However, gross income from foreclosure property will
qualify under the 75% and 95% gross income tests. Foreclosure
property is any real property, including interests in real
property, and any personal property incident to such real
property:
|
|
Ø
|
that is acquired by a REIT as the result of the REIT having bid
on such property at foreclosure, or having otherwise reduced
such property to ownership or possession by agreement or process
of law, after there was a default or default was imminent on a
lease of such property or on indebtedness that such property
secured;
|
|
Ø
|
for which the related loan was acquired by the REIT at a time
when the default was not imminent or anticipated; and
|
|
Ø
|
for which the REIT makes a proper election to treat the property
as foreclosure property.
|
165
Material federal
income tax considerations
Foreclosure property also includes certain qualified
health care properties (as defined above under
Rents from Real Property) acquired by a REIT
as a result of the termination or expiration of a lease of such
property (other than by reason of a default, or the imminence of
a default, on the lease).
A REIT will not be considered to have foreclosed on a property
where the REIT takes control of the property as a
mortgagee-in-possession
and cannot receive any profit or sustain any loss except as a
creditor of the mortgagor. Property generally ceases to be
foreclosure property at the end of the third taxable year (or,
with respect to qualified health care property, the
second taxable year) following the taxable year in which the
REIT acquired the property, or longer if an extension is granted
by the Secretary of the Treasury. However, this grace period
terminates and foreclosure property ceases to be foreclosure
property on the first day:
|
|
Ø
|
on which a lease is entered into for the property that, by its
terms, will give rise to income that does not qualify for
purposes of the 75% gross income test, or any amount is received
or accrued, directly or indirectly, pursuant to a lease entered
into on or after such day that will give rise to income that
does not qualify for purposes of the 75% gross income test;
|
|
Ø
|
on which any construction takes place on the property, other
than completion of a building or any other improvement, where
more than 10% of the construction was completed before default
became imminent; or
|
|
Ø
|
which is more than 90 days after the day on which the REIT
acquired the property and the property is used in a trade or
business which is conducted by the REIT, other than through an
independent contractor from whom the REIT itself does not derive
or receive any income. Income that we derive from an independent
contractor with respect to a qualified health care
property is disregarded if such income is derived pursuant
to a lease in effect at the time we acquired the qualified
heath care property, through renewal of such a lease
according to its terms, or through a lease entered into on
substantially similar terms.
|
Hedging Transactions.
From time to time, we or
our operating partnership may enter into hedging transactions
with respect to one or more of our assets or liabilities. Our
hedging activities may include entering into interest rate
swaps, caps, and floors, options to purchase such items, and
futures and forward contracts. Income and gain from
hedging transactions will be excluded from gross
income for purposes of both the 75% and 95% gross income tests.
A hedging transaction means either (1) any
transaction entered into in the normal course of our or our
operating partnerships trade or business primarily to
manage the risk of interest rate, price changes, or currency
fluctuations with respect to borrowings made or to be made, or
ordinary obligations incurred or to be incurred, to acquire or
carry real estate assets and (2) any transaction entered
into primarily to manage the risk of currency fluctuations with
respect to any item of income or gain that would be qualifying
income under the 75% or 95% gross income test (or any property
which generates such income or gain). We are required to clearly
identify any such hedging transaction before the close of the
day on which it was acquired, originated, or entered into and to
satisfy other identification requirements. We intend to
structure any hedging transactions in a manner that does not
jeopardize our qualification as a REIT.
Foreign Currency Gain.
Certain foreign
currency gains will be excluded from gross income for purposes
of one or both of the gross income tests. Real estate
foreign exchange gain will be excluded from gross income
for purposes of the 75% and 95% gross income tests. Real estate
foreign exchange gain generally includes foreign currency gain
attributable to any item of income or gain that is qualifying
income for purposes of the 75% gross income test, foreign
currency gain attributable to the acquisition or ownership of
(or becoming or being the obligor under) obligations secured by
mortgages on real property or on interest in real property and
certain foreign currency gain attributable to certain
qualified business units of a REIT. Passive
foreign exchange gain will be excluded from gross income
for purposes of the 95% gross income test. Passive foreign
exchange gain generally includes real estate foreign exchange
gain as described above, and also includes foreign currency gain
attributable to
166
Material federal
income tax considerations
any item of income or gain that is qualifying income for
purposes of the 95% gross income test and foreign currency gain
attributable to the acquisition or ownership of (or becoming or
being the obligor under) obligations. These exclusions for real
estate foreign exchange gain and passive foreign exchange gain
do not apply to any certain foreign currency gain derived from
dealing, or engaging in substantial and regular trading, in
securities. Such gain is treated as nonqualifying income for
purposes of both the 75% and 95% gross income tests.
Failure to Satisfy Gross Income Tests.
If we
fail to satisfy one or both of the gross income tests for any
taxable year, we nevertheless may qualify as a REIT for that
year if we qualify for relief under certain provisions of the
federal income tax laws. Those relief provisions are available
if:
|
|
Ø
|
our failure to meet those tests is due to reasonable cause and
not to willful neglect; and
|
|
Ø
|
following such failure for any taxable year, we file a schedule
of the sources of our income in accordance with regulations
prescribed by the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury.
|
We cannot predict, however, whether in all circumstances we
would qualify for the relief provisions. In addition, as
discussed above in Taxation of Our Company,
even if the relief provisions apply, we would incur a 100% tax
on the gross income attributable to the greater of the amount by
which we fail the 75% gross income test or the 95% gross income
test multiplied, in either case, by a fraction intended to
reflect our profitability.
ASSET
TESTS
To qualify as a REIT, we also must satisfy the following asset
tests at the end of each quarter of each taxable year. First, at
least 75% of the value of our total assets must consist of:
|
|
Ø
|
cash or cash items, including certain receivables and, in
certain circumstances, foreign currencies;
|
|
Ø
|
government securities;
|
|
Ø
|
interests in real property, including leaseholds and options to
acquire real property and leaseholds;
|
|
Ø
|
interests in mortgages loans secured by real property;
|
|
Ø
|
stock in other REITs; and
|
|
Ø
|
investments in stock or debt instruments during the one-year
period following our receipt of new capital that we raise
through equity offerings or public offerings of debt with at
least a five-year term.
|
Second, of our investments not included in the 75% asset class,
the value of our interest in any one issuers securities
may not exceed 5% of the value of our total assets, or the 5%
asset test.
Third, of our investments not included in the 75% asset class,
we may not own more than 10% of the voting power or value of any
one issuers outstanding securities, or the 10% vote or
value test.
Fourth, no more than 25% of the value of our total assets may
consist of the securities of one or more TRSs.
Fifth, no more than 25% of the value of our total assets may
consist of the securities of TRSs and other non-TRS taxable
subsidiaries and other assets that are not qualifying assets for
purposes of the 75% asset test, or the 25% securities test.
For purposes of the 5% asset test and the 10% vote or value
test, the term securities does not include shares in
another REIT, equity or debt securities of a qualified REIT
subsidiary or TRS, mortgage loans that constitute real estate
assets, or equity interests in a partnership. The term
securities, however,
167
Material federal
income tax considerations
generally includes debt securities issued by a partnership or
another REIT, except that for purposes of the 10% value test,
the term securities does not include:
|
|
Ø
|
Straight debt securities, which is defined as a
written unconditional promise to pay on demand or on a specified
date a sum certain in money if (i) the debt is not
convertible, directly or indirectly, into shares, and
(ii) the interest rate and interest payment dates are not
contingent on profits, the borrowers discretion, or
similar factors. Straight debt securities do not
include any securities issued by a partnership or a corporation
in which we or any controlled TRS (i.e., a TRS in which we own
directly or indirectly more than 50% of the voting power or
value of the stock) hold non-straight debt
securities that have an aggregate value of more than 1% of the
issuers outstanding securities. However, straight
debt securities include debt subject to the following
contingencies:
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
a contingency relating to the time of payment of interest or
principal, as long as either (i) there is no change to the
effective yield of the debt obligation, other than a change to
the annual yield that does not exceed the greater of 0.25% or 5%
of the annual yield, or (ii) neither the aggregate issue
price nor the aggregate face amount of the issuers debt
obligations held by us exceeds $1 million and no more than
12 months of unaccrued interest on the debt obligations can
be required to be prepaid; and
|
|
|
-
|
a contingency relating to the time or amount of payment upon a
default or prepayment of a debt obligation, as long as the
contingency is consistent with customary commercial practice.
|
|
|
Ø
|
Any loan to an individual or an estate;
|
|
Ø
|
Any section 467 rental agreement, other
than an agreement with a related party tenant;
|
|
Ø
|
Any obligation to pay rents from real property;
|
|
Ø
|
Certain securities issued by governmental entities;
|
|
Ø
|
Any security issued by a REIT;
|
|
Ø
|
Any debt instrument issued by an entity treated as a partnership
for federal income tax purposes in which we are a partner to the
extent of our proportionate interest in the equity and debt
securities of the partnership; and
|
|
Ø
|
Any debt instrument issued by an entity treated as a partnership
for federal income tax purposes not described in the preceding
bullet points if at least 75% of the partnerships gross
income, excluding income from prohibited transactions, is
qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test
described above in Gross Income Tests.
|
For purposes of the 10% value test, our proportionate share of
the assets of a partnership is our proportionate interest in any
securities issued by the partnership, without regard to the
securities described in the last two bullet points above.
We will monitor the status of our assets for purposes of the
various asset tests and will manage our portfolio in order to
comply at all times with such tests. If we fail to satisfy the
asset tests at the end of a calendar quarter, we will not lose
our REIT qualification if:
|
|
Ø
|
we satisfied the asset tests at the end of the preceding
calendar quarter; and
|
|
Ø
|
the discrepancy between the value of our assets and the asset
test requirements arose from changes in the market values of our
assets and was not wholly or partly caused by the acquisition of
one or more non-qualifying assets.
|
If we did not satisfy the condition described in the second
item, above, we still could avoid disqualification by
eliminating any discrepancy within 30 days after the close
of the calendar quarter in which it arose.
168
Material federal
income tax considerations
In the event that we violate the 5% asset test or the 10% vote
or value test described above, we will not lose our REIT
qualification if (1) the failure is de minimis (up to the
lesser of 1% of our assets or $10 million) and (2) we
dispose of assets or otherwise comply with the asset tests
within six months after the last day of the quarter in which we
identify such failure. In the event of a failure of any of the
asset tests (other than de minimis failures described in the
preceding sentence), as long as the failure was due to
reasonable cause and not to willful neglect, we will not lose
our REIT qualification if we (1) dispose of assets or
otherwise comply with the asset tests within six months after
the last day of the quarter in which we identify the failure,
(2) we file a description of each asset causing the failure
with the IRS and (3) pay a tax equal to the greater of
$50,000 or 35% of the net income from the nonqualifying assets
during the period in which we failed to satisfy the asset tests.
We believe that the assets that we will hold will satisfy the
foregoing asset test requirements. However, we will not obtain
independent appraisals to support our conclusions as to the
value of our assets and securities or the real estate collateral
for any mortgage or mezzanine loans we may acquire. Moreover,
the values of some assets may not be susceptible to a precise
determination. As a result, there can be no assurance that the
IRS will not contend that our ownership of securities and other
assets violates one or more of the asset tests applicable to
REITs.
DISTRIBUTION
REQUIREMENTS
Each taxable year, we must distribute dividends, other than
capital gain dividends and deemed distributions of retained
capital gain, to our stockholders in an aggregate amount at
least equal to:
|
|
Ø
|
the sum of
|
|
Ø
|
90% of our REIT taxable income, computed without
regard to the dividends paid deduction and our net capital gain
or loss, and
|
|
Ø
|
90% of our after-tax net income, if any, from foreclosure
property, minus
|
|
Ø
|
the sum of certain items of non-cash income.
|
We must pay such distributions in the taxable year to which they
relate, or in the following taxable year if either (a) we
declare the distribution before we timely file our federal
income tax return for the year and pay the distribution on or
before the first regular dividend payment date after such
declaration or (b) we declare the distribution in October,
November or December of the taxable year, payable to
stockholders of record on a specified day in any such month, and
we actually pay the dividend before the end of January of the
following year. The distributions under clause (a) are
taxable to the stockholders in the year in which paid, and the
distributions in clause (b) are treated as paid on
December 31st of the prior taxable year. In both
instances, these distributions relate to our prior taxable year
for purposes of the 90% distribution requirement.
We will pay federal income tax on taxable income, including net
capital gain, that we do not distribute to stockholders.
Furthermore, if we fail to distribute during a calendar year, or
by the end of January following the calendar year in the case of
distributions with declaration and record dates falling in the
last three months of the calendar year, at least the sum of:
|
|
Ø
|
85% of our REIT ordinary income for such year,
|
|
Ø
|
95% of our REIT capital gain income for such year, and
|
|
Ø
|
any undistributed taxable income from prior periods,
|
we will incur a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the excess of
such required distribution over the amounts we actually
distribute.
169
Material federal
income tax considerations
We may elect to retain and pay income tax on the net long-term
capital gain we receive in a taxable year. If we so elect, we
will be treated as having distributed any such retained amount
for purposes of the 4% nondeductible excise tax described above.
We intend to make timely distributions sufficient to satisfy the
annual distribution requirements and to avoid corporate income
tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax.
Our distributions will count towards satisfaction of the 90%
distribution requirement and for purposes of reducing our
taxable income, as described above, only to the extent such
distributions are not treated as preferential dividends for
federal income tax purposes. The determination of whether a
distribution will be treated as a preferential dividend is not
always entirely clear. Accordingly, no assurance can be provided
that the IRS will not successfully contend that certain of our
distributions will be treated as preferential dividends.
It is possible that, from time to time, we may experience timing
differences between the actual receipt of income and actual
payment of deductible expenses and the inclusion of that income
and deduction of such expenses in arriving at our REIT taxable
income. For example, we may not deduct recognized capital losses
from our REIT taxable income. Further, it is
possible that, from time to time, we may be allocated a share of
net capital gain attributable to the sale of depreciated
property that exceeds our allocable share of cash attributable
to that sale. As a result of the foregoing, we may have less
cash than is necessary to distribute taxable income sufficient
to avoid corporate income tax and the excise tax imposed on
certain undistributed income or even to meet the 90%
distribution requirement. In such a situation, we may need to
borrow funds or, if possible, pay taxable dividends of our
capital stock or debt securities.
Pursuant to a recent revenue procedure (Revenue Procedure
2010-12),
or
the Revenue Procedure, issued by the IRS, the IRS has indicated
that it will treat distributions from publicly-traded REITs that
are paid part in cash and part in stock as dividends that would
satisfy the REIT annual distribution requirements and qualify
for the dividends paid deduction for federal income tax
purposes. In order to qualify for such treatment, the Revenue
Procedure requires that at least 10% of the total distribution
be payable in cash and that each stockholder have a right to
elect to receive its entire distribution in cash. If too many
stockholders elect to receive cash, each stockholder electing to
receive cash must receive a proportionate share of the cash to
be distributed (although no stockholder electing to receive cash
may receive less than 10% of such stockholders
distribution in cash). This Revenue Procedure applies to
distributions declared on or before December 31, 2012 with
respect to taxable years ending on or before December 31,
2011. We have no current intention of paying dividends in shares
of our stock.
Under certain circumstances, we may be able to correct a failure
to meet the distribution requirement for a year by paying
deficiency dividends to our stockholders in a later
year. We may include such deficiency dividends in our deduction
for dividends paid for the earlier year. Although we may be able
to avoid income tax on amounts distributed as deficiency
dividends, we will be required to pay interest to the IRS based
upon the amount of any deduction we take for deficiency
dividends.
RECORDKEEPING
REQUIREMENTS
We must maintain certain records in order to qualify as a REIT.
In addition, to avoid a monetary penalty, we must request on an
annual basis information from our stockholders designed to
disclose the actual ownership of our outstanding stock. We
intend to comply with these requirements.
FAILURE TO
QUALIFY
If we fail to satisfy one or more requirements for REIT
qualification, other than the gross income tests and the asset
tests, we could avoid disqualification if our failure is due to
reasonable cause and not to willful neglect and we pay a penalty
of $50,000 for each such failure. In addition, there are relief
170
Material federal
income tax considerations
provisions for a failure of the gross income tests and asset
tests, as described in Gross Income Tests and
Asset Tests.
If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, and no
relief provision applies, we would be subject to federal income
tax and any applicable alternative minimum tax on our taxable
income at regular corporate rates. In calculating our taxable
income in a year in which we fail to qualify as a REIT, we would
not be able to deduct amounts paid out to stockholders. In fact,
we would not be required to distribute any amounts to
stockholders in that year. In such event, to the extent of our
current and accumulated earnings and profits, all distributions
to stockholders would be taxable as ordinary income. Subject to
certain limitations of the federal income tax laws, corporate
stockholders might be eligible for the dividends received
deduction and stockholders taxed at individual rates may be
eligible for the reduced federal income tax rate of 15% through
2010 on such dividends. Unless we qualified for relief under
specific statutory provisions, we also would be disqualified
from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the
year during which we ceased to qualify as a REIT. We cannot
predict whether in all circumstances we would qualify for such
statutory relief.
TAXATION OF
TAXABLE U.S. STOCKHOLDERS
As used herein, the term U.S. stockholder means
a holder of our common stock that for federal income tax
purposes is:
|
|
Ø
|
a citizen or resident of the United States;
|
|
Ø
|
a corporation (including an entity treated as a corporation for
federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under
the laws of the United States, any of its states or the District
of Columbia;
|
|
Ø
|
an estate whose income is subject to federal income taxation
regardless of its source; or
|
|
Ø
|
any trust if (1) a U.S. court is able to exercise
primary supervision over the administration of such trust and
one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all
substantial decisions of the trust or (2) it has a valid
election in place to be treated as a U.S. person.
|
If a partnership, entity or arrangement treated as a partnership
for federal income tax purposes holds our common stock, the
federal income tax treatment of a partner in the partnership
will generally depend on the status of the partner and the
activities of the partnership. If you are a partner in a
partnership holding our common stock, you should consult your
tax advisor regarding the consequences of the ownership and
disposition of our common stock by the partnership.
As long as we qualify as a REIT, a taxable U.S. stockholder
must generally take into account as ordinary income
distributions made out of our current or accumulated earnings
and profits that we do not designate as capital gain dividends
or retained long-term capital gain. A U.S. stockholder will
not qualify for the dividends received deduction generally
available to corporations. In addition, dividends paid to a
U.S. stockholder generally will not qualify for the 15% tax
rate for qualified dividend income. The maximum tax
rate for qualified dividend income received by
U.S. stockholders taxed at individual rates is 15% through
2010. The maximum tax rate on qualified dividend income is lower
than the maximum tax rate on ordinary income, which is currently
35%. Qualified dividend income generally includes dividends paid
to U.S. stockholders taxed at individual rates by domestic
C corporations and certain qualified foreign corporations.
Because we are not generally subject to federal income tax on
the portion of our REIT taxable income distributed to our
stockholders (see Taxation of Our Company
above), our dividends generally will not be eligible for the 15%
rate on qualified dividend income. As a result, our ordinary
REIT dividends will be taxed at the higher tax rate applicable
to ordinary income. However, the 15% tax rate for qualified
dividend income will apply to our ordinary REIT dividends
(i) attributable to dividends received by us from non-REIT
corporations, such as our TRS lessee, and (ii) to the
extent attributable to income upon which we have paid corporate
income tax (e.g., to the extent that we distribute less than
100% of our taxable income). In general, to
171
Material federal
income tax considerations
qualify for the reduced tax rate on qualified dividend income, a
stockholder must hold our common stock for more than
60 days during the
121-day
period beginning on the date that is 60 days before the
date on which our common stock becomes ex-dividend. In addition,
for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012,
dividends paid to certain individuals, estates or trusts will be
subject to a 3.8% Medicare tax. We may pay taxable dividends of
our stock or debt securities. In the case of such a taxable
distribution of our stock or debt securities,
U.S. stockholders would be required to include the dividend
as income and would be required to satisfy the liability
associated with the dividend with cash from other sources,
including sales of our stock or debt securities.
A U.S. stockholder generally will take into account as
long-term capital gain any distributions that we designate as
capital gain dividends without regard to the period for which
the U.S. stockholder has held our common stock. We
generally will designate our capital gain dividends as either
15% or 25% rate distributions for U.S. stockholders taxed
at individual rates. See Capital Gains and
Losses. A corporate U.S. stockholder, however, may be
required to treat up to 20% of certain capital gain dividends as
ordinary income.
We may elect to retain and pay income tax on the net long-term
capital gain that we receive in a taxable year. In that case, to
the extent that we designate such amount in a timely notice to
such stockholder, a U.S. stockholder would be taxed on its
proportionate share of our undistributed long-term capital gain.
The U.S. stockholder would receive a credit for its
proportionate share of the tax we paid. The
U.S. stockholder would increase the basis in its stock by
the amount of its proportionate share of our undistributed
long-term capital gain, minus its share of the tax we paid.
A U.S. stockholder will not incur tax on a distribution in
excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits if
the distribution does not exceed the adjusted basis of the
U.S. stockholders common stock. Instead, the
distribution will reduce the adjusted basis of such stock. A
U.S. stockholder will recognize a distribution in excess of
both our current and accumulated earnings and profits and the
U.S. stockholders adjusted basis in his or her stock
as long-term capital gain, or short-term capital gain if the
shares of stock have been held for one year or less, assuming
the shares of stock are a capital asset in the hands of the
U.S. stockholder. In addition, if we declare a distribution
in October, November, or December of any year that is payable to
a U.S. stockholder of record on a specified date in any
such month, such distribution shall be treated as both paid by
us and received by the U.S. stockholder on December 31 of
such year, provided that we actually pay the distribution during
January of the following calendar year.
Stockholders may not include in their individual income tax
returns any of our net operating losses or capital losses.
Instead, these losses are generally carried over by us for
potential offset against our future income. Taxable
distributions from us and gain from the disposition of our
common stock will not be treated as passive activity income and,
therefore, stockholders generally will not be able to apply any
passive activity losses, such as losses from certain
types of limited partnerships in which the stockholder is a
limited partner, against such income. In addition, taxable
distributions from us and gain from the disposition of our
common stock generally will be treated as investment income for
purposes of the investment interest limitations. We will notify
stockholders after the close of our taxable year as to the
portions of the distributions attributable to that year that
constitute ordinary income, return of capital and capital gain.
TAXATION OF U.S.
STOCKHOLDERS ON THE DISPOSITION OF COMMON STOCK
A U.S. stockholder who is not a dealer in securities must
generally treat any gain or loss realized upon a taxable
disposition of our common stock as long-term capital gain or
loss if the U.S. stockholder has held our common stock for
more than one year and otherwise as short-term capital gain or
loss. In general, a U.S. stockholder will realize gain or
loss in an amount equal to the difference between the sum of the
fair market value of any property and the amount of cash
received in such disposition and
172
Material federal
income tax considerations
the U.S. stockholders adjusted tax basis. A
stockholders adjusted tax basis generally will equal the
U.S. stockholders acquisition cost, increased by the
excess of net capital gains deemed distributed to the
U.S. stockholder (discussed above) less tax deemed paid on
such gains and reduced by any returns of capital. However, a
U.S. stockholder must treat any loss upon a sale or
exchange of common stock held by such stockholder for six months
or less as a long-term capital loss to the extent of capital
gain dividends and any other actual or deemed distributions from
us that such U.S. stockholder treats as long-term capital
gain. All or a portion of any loss that a U.S. stockholder
realizes upon a taxable disposition of our common stock may be
disallowed if the U.S. stockholder purchases other common
stock within 30 days before or after the disposition.
CAPITAL GAINS AND
LOSSES
A taxpayer generally must hold a capital asset for more than one
year for gain or loss derived from its sale or exchange to be
treated as long-term capital gain or loss. The highest marginal
individual income tax rate currently is 35% (which rate absent
additional congressional action, will apply until
December 31, 2010). The maximum tax rate on long-term
capital gain applicable to taxpayers taxed at individual rates
is 15% for sales and exchanges of assets held for more than one
year occurring through December 31, 2010. The maximum tax
rate on long-term capital gain from the sale or exchange of
Section 1250 property, or depreciable real
property, is 25%, which applies to the lesser of the total
amount of the gain or the accumulated depreciation on the
Section 1250 property. In addition, for taxable years
beginning after December 31, 2012, capital gains recognized
by certain of our stockholders that are individuals, estates or
trusts from the sale or other disposition of our common stock
will be subject to a 3.8% Medicare tax.
With respect to distributions that we designate as capital gain
dividends and any retained capital gain that we are deemed to
distribute, we generally may designate whether such a
distribution is taxable to our stockholders taxed at individual
rates at a 15% or 25% rate. Thus, the tax rate differential
between capital gain and ordinary income for those taxpayers may
be significant. In addition, the characterization of income as
capital gain or ordinary income may affect the deductibility of
capital losses. A non-corporate taxpayer may deduct capital
losses not offset by capital gains against its ordinary income
only up to a maximum annual amount of $3,000. A non-corporate
taxpayer may carry forward unused capital losses indefinitely. A
corporate taxpayer must pay tax on its net capital gain at
ordinary corporate rates. A corporate taxpayer may deduct
capital losses only to the extent of capital gains, with unused
losses being carried back three years and forward five years.
TAXATION OF
TAX-EXEMPT STOCKHOLDERS
Tax-exempt entities, including qualified employee pension and
profit sharing trusts and individual retirement accounts,
generally are exempt from federal income taxation. However, they
are subject to taxation on their unrelated business taxable
income, or UBTI. Although many investments in real estate
generate UBTI, the IRS has issued a ruling that dividend
distributions from a REIT to an exempt employee pension trust do
not constitute UBTI so long as the exempt employee pension trust
does not otherwise use the shares of the REIT in an unrelated
trade or business of the pension trust. Based on that ruling,
amounts that we distribute to tax-exempt stockholders generally
should not constitute UBTI. However, if a tax-exempt stockholder
were to finance its acquisition of common stock with debt, a
portion of the income that it receives from us would constitute
UBTI pursuant to the debt-financed property rules.
Moreover, social clubs, voluntary employee benefit associations,
supplemental unemployment benefit trusts and qualified group
legal services plans that are exempt from taxation under special
provisions of the federal income tax laws are subject to
different UBTI rules, which generally will require them to
characterize distributions that they receive from us as UBTI.
Finally, in certain circumstances, a qualified employee pension
or profit sharing trust that owns more than 10% of our capital
stock must treat a percentage of the dividends that it receives
from us as UBTI. Such
173
Material federal
income tax considerations
percentage is equal to the gross income we derive from an
unrelated trade or business, determined as if we were a pension
trust, divided by our total gross income for the year in which
we pay the dividends. That rule applies to a pension trust
holding more than 10% of our capital stock only if:
|
|
Ø
|
the percentage of our dividends that the tax-exempt trust must
treat as UBTI is at least 5%;
|
|
Ø
|
we qualify as a REIT by reason of the modification of the rule
requiring that no more than 50% of our capital stock be owned by
five or fewer individuals that allows the beneficiaries of the
pension trust to be treated as holding our capital stock in
proportion to their actuarial interests in the pension trust; and
|
|
Ø
|
either:
|
|
Ø
|
one pension trust owns more than 25% of the value of our capital
stock; or
|
|
Ø
|
a group of pension trusts individually holding more than 10% of
the value of our capital stock collectively owns more than 50%
of the value of our capital stock.
|
TAXATION OF
NON-U.S.
STOCKHOLDERS
The term
non-U.S. stockholder
means a holder of our common stock that is not a
U.S. stockholder or a partnership (or entity treated as a
partnership for federal income tax purposes). The rules
governing federal income taxation of nonresident alien
individuals, foreign corporations, foreign partnerships, and
other foreign stockholders are complex. This section is only a
summary of such rules. We urge
non-U.S. stockholders
to consult their own tax advisors to determine the impact of
federal, state, and local income tax laws on the purchase,
ownership and sale of our common stock, including any reporting
requirements.
A
non-U.S. stockholder
that receives a distribution that is not attributable to gain
from our sale or exchange of a United States real property
interest, or USRPI, as defined below, and that we do not
designate as a capital gain dividend or retained capital gain
will recognize ordinary income to the extent that we pay such
distribution out of our current or accumulated earnings and
profits. A withholding tax equal to 30% of the gross amount of
the distribution ordinarily will apply to such distribution
unless an applicable tax treaty reduces or eliminates the tax.
However, if a distribution is treated as effectively connected
with the
non-U.S. stockholders
conduct of a U.S. trade or business, the
non-U.S. stockholder
generally will be subject to federal income tax on the
distribution at graduated rates, in the same manner as
U.S. stockholders are taxed with respect to such
distribution, and a
non-U.S. stockholder
that is a corporation also may be subject to the 30% branch
profits tax with respect to that distribution. We plan to
withhold U.S. income tax at the rate of 30% on the gross
amount of any such distribution paid to a
non-U.S. stockholder
unless either:
|
|
Ø
|
a lower treaty rate applies and the
non-U.S. stockholder
files an IRS
Form W-8BEN
evidencing eligibility for that reduced rate with us; or
|
|
Ø
|
the
non-U.S. stockholder
files an IRS
Form W-8ECI
with us claiming that the distribution is effectively connected
income.
|
A
non-U.S. stockholder
will not incur tax on a distribution in excess of our current
and accumulated earnings and profits if the excess portion of
such distribution does not exceed the adjusted basis of its
common stock. Instead, the excess portion of such distribution
will reduce the adjusted basis of such stock. A
non-U.S. stockholder
will be subject to tax on a distribution that exceeds both our
current and accumulated earnings and profits and the adjusted
basis of its common stock, if the
non-U.S. stockholder
otherwise would be subject to tax on gain from the sale or
disposition of its common stock, as described below. Because we
generally cannot determine at the time we make a distribution
whether the distribution will exceed our current and accumulated
earnings and profits, we normally will withhold tax on the
entire amount of any distribution at the same rate as we would
174
Material federal
income tax considerations
withhold on a dividend. However, a
non-U.S. stockholder
may claim a refund of amounts that we withhold if we later
determine that a distribution in fact exceeded our current and
accumulated earnings and profits. In the case of a taxable stock
dividend with respect to which any withholding tax is imposed,
we may be required to withhold or dispose of part of the shares
otherwise distributable in such dividend and use such shares or
the proceeds of such disposition to satisfy the withholding tax
imposed. In addition, under the FIRPTA provisions discussed
below, we must withhold 10% of any distribution that exceeds our
current and accumulated earnings and profits. Consequently,
although we intend to withhold at a rate of 30% on the entire
amount of any distribution, to the extent that we do not do so,
we will withhold at a rate of 10% on any portion of a
distribution not subject to withholding at a rate of 30%.
For any year in which we qualify as a REIT, a
non-U.S. stockholder
will incur tax on distributions that are attributable to gain
from our sale or exchange of a USRPI under the Foreign
Investment in Real Property Act of 1980, or FIRPTA. A USRPI
generally includes certain interests in real property and stock
in corporations at least 50% of whose assets consist of
interests in real property. Under FIRPTA, a
non-U.S. stockholder
is taxed on distributions attributable to gain from sales of
USRPIs as if such gain were effectively connected with a
U.S. business of the
non-U.S. stockholder.
A
non-U.S. stockholder
thus would be taxed on such a distribution at the normal capital
gains rates applicable to U.S. stockholders, subject to
applicable alternative minimum tax and a special alternative
minimum tax in the case of a nonresident alien individual. A
non-U.S. corporate
stockholder not entitled to treaty relief or exemption also may
be subject to the 30% branch profits tax on such a distribution.
We would be required to withhold 35% of any distribution that we
could designate as a capital gain dividend. A
non-U.S. stockholder
may receive a credit against its tax liability for the amount we
withhold.
However, if our common stock is regularly traded on an
established securities market in the United States, capital gain
distributions on our common stock that are attributable to our
sale of real property will be treated as ordinary dividends
rather than as gain from the sale of a USRPI, as long as the
non-U.S. stockholder
did not own more than 5% of our common stock at any time during
the one-year period preceding the distribution. As a result,
non-U.S. stockholders
generally will be subject to withholding tax on such capital
gain distributions in the same manner as they are subject to
withholding tax on ordinary dividends. We anticipate that our
common stock will be regularly traded on an established
securities market in the United States following this offering.
If our common stock is not regularly traded on an established
securities market in the United States or the
non-U.S. stockholder
owned more than 5% of our common stock at any time during the
one-year period preceding the distribution, capital gain
distributions that are attributable to our sale of real property
would be subject to tax under FIRPTA, as described in the
preceding paragraph. Moreover, if a
non-U.S. stockholder
disposes of our common stock during the
30-day
period preceding a dividend payment, and such
non-U.S. stockholder
(or a person related to such
non-U.S. stockholder)
acquires or enters into a contract or option to acquire our
common stock within 61 days of the first day of the
30-day
period described above, and any portion of such dividend payment
would, but for the disposition, be treated as a USRPI capital
gain to such
non-U.S. stockholder,
then such
non-U.S. stockholder
shall be treated as having USRPI capital gain in an amount that,
but for the disposition, would have been treated as USRPI
capital gain.
Non-U.S. stockholders
could incur federal income tax under FIRPTA with respect to gain
realized upon a disposition of our common stock if we are a
United States real property holding corporation during a
specified testing period. If at least 50% of a REITs
assets are USRPIs, then the REIT will be a United States real
property holding corporation. We anticipate that we will be a
United States real property holding corporation based on our
investment strategy. However, if we are a United States real
property holding corporation, a
non-U.S. stockholder
generally would not incur tax under FIRPTA on gain from the sale
of our common stock if we are a domestically controlled
qualified investment entity. A domestically controlled
qualified investment entity includes a REIT in which, at all
times during a
175
Material federal
income tax considerations
specified testing period, less than 50% in value of its shares
are held directly or indirectly by
non-U.S. stockholders.
We cannot assure you that this test will be met. If our common
stock is regularly traded on an established securities market,
an additional exception to the tax under FIRPTA will be
available with respect to our common stock, even if we do not
qualify as a domestically controlled qualified investment entity
at the time the
non-U.S. stockholder
sells our common stock. Under that exception, the gain from such
a sale by such a
non-U.S. stockholder
will not be subject to tax under FIRPTA if:
|
|
Ø
|
our common stock is treated as being regularly traded under
applicable U.S. Treasury regulations on an established
securities market; and
|
|
Ø
|
the
non-U.S. stockholder
owned, actually or constructively, 5% or less of our common
stock at all times during a specified testing period.
|
As noted above, we anticipate that our common stock will be
regularly traded on an established securities market following
this offering.
If the gain on the sale of our common stock were taxed under
FIRPTA, a
non-U.S. stockholder
would be taxed on that gain in the same manner as
U.S. stockholders, subject to applicable alternative
minimum tax and a special alternative minimum tax in the case of
nonresident alien individuals. Furthermore, a
non-U.S. stockholder
generally will incur tax on gain not subject to FIRPTA if:
|
|
Ø
|
the gain is effectively connected with the
non-U.S. stockholders
U.S. trade or business, in which case the
non-U.S. stockholder
will be subject to the same treatment as U.S. stockholders
with respect to such gain; or
|
|
Ø
|
the
non-U.S. stockholder
is a nonresident alien individual who was present in the
U.S. for 183 days or more during the taxable year and
has a tax home in the United States, in which case
the
non-U.S. stockholder
will incur a 30% tax on his or her capital gains.
|
For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012, a
U.S. withholding tax at a 30% rate will be imposed on
dividends and proceeds of sale in respect of our common stock
received by certain
non-U.S. stockholders
if certain disclosure requirements related to U.S. accounts
or ownership are not satisfied. If payment of withholding taxes
is required,
non-U.S. stockholders
that are otherwise eligible for an exemption from, or reduction
of, U.S. withholding taxes with respect of such dividends
and proceeds will be required to seek a refund from the IRS to
obtain the benefit or such exemption or reduction. We will not
pay any additional amounts in respect of any amounts withheld.
TAXATION OF
WARRANTS
Distribution of Warrants.
There is no
authority addressing the federal income tax treatment of a
distribution of securities with terms substantially the same as
the warrants under substantially similar circumstances, and,
therefore, the treatment of the distribution is not entirely
clear. We intend to treat each warrant for federal income tax
purposes as acquired in a distribution pursuant to which the
value of the warrant is not included in the gross income of the
recipient under Section 305(a) of the Code. Pursuant to
this treatment, each recipient of a warrant must allocate the
purchase price paid by such holder for the related share of
common stock pursuant to this offering between the share of
common stock and the warrant based on their respective fair
market values. However, the basis of the warrant will be zero if
the fair market value of the warrant on the date of the
distribution is less than 15% of the fair market value of the
related share of common stock, unless the holder elects to
allocate part of the basis of the common stock to the warrant as
provided in the preceding sentence. Any such election will apply
to all warrants received on the distribution date and once made
is irrevocable.
Our view of the characterization of the distribution of the
warrants described above and a holders purchase price
allocation are not, however, binding on the IRS or a court of
law. For example, the IRS
176
Material federal
income tax considerations
may contend that the distribution of the warrants should be
treated as contingent consideration or an adjustment to the
purchase price of the common stock acquired in this offering. In
that case, the distribution of the warrants would not be a
taxable event, but a shareholder would be required to allocate a
portion of the basis of the common stock to the warrant without
regarded to the 15% threshold described above. The IRS may also
contend that the distribution of the warrants is, in whole or in
part, a taxable distribution.
Because there are no authorities directly addressing a
distribution of securities similar to the warrants, no assurance
can be given that the IRS or the courts will agree with the
characterization of the distribution described above or the
discussion below. Accordingly, we urge you to consult your tax
advisors regarding the federal income tax consequences of
receipt of a warrant. The following discussion is based on the
assumption that the characterization of the warrants and the
allocation described above are accepted for federal income tax
purposes.
Exercise of Warrants.
Unless we elect to pay
cash upon exercise of a warrant, a warrantholder generally will
not recognize taxable gain or loss upon the exercise of a
warrant by paying the exercise price in cash. The
warrantholders adjusted tax basis in the shares of our
common stock received upon exercise will equal the sum of the
warrantholders tax basis in the warrant immediately prior
to exercise (generally the portion of the holders purchase
price for the related share of common stock that is allocated to
the warrant, as described above under Distribution
of Warrants) plus the exercise price of the warrant. In
the event we elect to pay cash upon exercise of a warrant, the
tax treatment of a warrantholder upon exercise will be as
described under Sale or Exchange of Warrants
below.
In the event of a redemption, we may elect to require all
holders that wish to exercise to do so on a cashless
basis. The tax treatment of a warrantholder that pays the
exercise price by surrendering warrants for cancellation, or a
cashless exercise, is uncertain. Such an exercise
may, for example, be treated as a tax-deferred recapitalization,
in which case a warrantholders tax basis in our common
stock received would equal the tax basis in the surrendered
warrants. It is also possible that a cashless exercise will be
treated as a taxable exchange in which gain or loss should be
recognized. Due to the absence of authority as to the federal
income tax treatment of a warrantholder making a cashless
exercise, there can be no assurance which, if any, of the
alternative tax consequences described above, or of other
possible characterizations of a cashless exercise, would be
adopted by the IRS or a court of law.
Accordingly,
warrantholders should consult their tax advisors as to the tax
consequences of making a cashless exercise.
Sale or Exchange of Warrants.
Upon the sale or
exchange of a warrant, a warrantholder generally will recognize
a taxable gain or loss equal to the difference between (i) the
sum of the amount of cash and the fair market value of property
received in the exchange therefor, and (ii) the
warrantholders tax basis, if any, in the warrant, as
described above. If we elect to pay cash upon exercise of a
warrant, the exercise will be treated as a sale or exchange and
the warrantholder generally will recognize taxable gain or loss
equal to the difference between (1) the excess of the cash
received over the exercise price of the warrant and (2) the
warrantholders tax basis, if any, in the warrant, as
described above. Capital gain or loss recognized by a
warrantholder upon the sale or exchange of a warrant generally
will be long-term capital gain or loss if the holding period
with respect to the warrant is more than one year.
Lapse of Warrants.
The lapse or expiration
without exercising a warrant generally will result in a capital
loss to the warrantholder equal to the warrantholders tax
basis, if any, in the warrant. The deductibility of capital
losses is subject to limitation. This capital loss will be a
long-term capital loss if the holding period with respect to
such warrant is more than one year.
Holding Period.
The holding period for shares
of our common stock will begin on the date following the date of
exercise (or possibly the date of exercise) of the warrant for
cash. As discussed above, the tax consequences of a
warrantholder making a cashless exercise are uncertain. If such
an exercise
177
Material federal
income tax considerations
qualifies as a tax-deferred recapitalization, the holding period
of such common stock should include the holding period of the
surrendered warrants. If such an exercise is taxable, then the
holding period for the shares of our common stock actually
received upon the exercise of the warrants should begin on the
date following the date of exercise (or possibly the date of
exercise) of the warrant and should not include the period
during which the warrants were held.
As discussed above, the tax consequences to a warrantholder of a
cashless exercise are uncertain. If such an exercise qualifies
as a tax-deferred recapitalization, the holding period of such
common stock should include the holding period of the
surrendered warrants. If such an exercise is taxable, then the
holding period for the shares of our common stock actually
received upon the exercise of the warrants should begin on the
date following the date of exercise (or possibly the date of
exercise) of the warrant and should not include the period
during which the warrants were held.
Adjustments to the Warrants.
Pursuant to the
terms of the warrants, the exercise price is subject to
adjustment from time to time upon the occurrence of specified
events. These adjustments should not give rise to a deemed
taxable exchange of the warrants to the extent such adjustments
are pursuant to the original terms of the warrants. However,
under certain circumstances, a change in the exercise price or
any transaction having a similar effect may be treated as a
taxable distribution with respect to any warrantholder whose
proportionate interest in our earnings and profits is increased
by such change or transaction (even though no cash is received).
Conversely, the absence of an appropriate anti-dilution
adjustment may result in a constructive distribution that could
be taxable as a dividend to the holders of the shares of common
stock.
INFORMATION
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND WITHHOLDING
We will report to our stockholders and to the IRS the amount of
distributions we pay during each calendar year, and the amount
of tax we withhold, if any. Under the backup withholding rules,
a stockholder may be subject to backup withholding at a rate of
28% with respect to distributions unless the holder:
|
|
Ø
|
is a corporation or qualifies for certain other exempt
categories and, when required, demonstrates this fact; or
|
|
Ø
|
provides a taxpayer identification number, certifies as to no
loss of exemption from backup withholding, and otherwise
complies with the applicable requirements of the backup
withholding rules.
|
A stockholder who does not provide us with its correct taxpayer
identification number also may be subject to penalties imposed
by the IRS. Any amount paid as backup withholding will be
creditable against the stockholders income tax liability.
In addition, we may be required to withhold a portion of capital
gain distributions to any stockholders who fail to certify their
non-foreign status to us.
Backup withholding will generally not apply to payments of
dividends made by us or our paying agents, in their capacities
as such, to a
non-U.S. stockholder
provided that the
non-U.S. stockholder
furnishes to us or our paying agent the required certification
as to its
non-U.S. status,
such as providing a valid IRS
Form W-8BEN
or
W-8ECI,
or certain other requirements are met. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, backup withholding may apply if either we or our
paying agent has actual knowledge, or reason to know, that the
holder is a U.S. person that is not an exempt recipient.
Payments of the proceeds from a disposition or a redemption
effected outside the U.S. by a
non-U.S. stockholder
made by or through a foreign office of a broker generally will
not be subject to information reporting or backup withholding.
However, information reporting (but not backup withholding)
generally will apply to such a payment if the broker has certain
connections with the U.S. unless the broker has documentary
evidence in its records that the beneficial owner is a
non-U.S. stockholder
and specified conditions are met or an exemption is otherwise
established. Payment of the proceeds from a disposition by a
178
Material federal
income tax considerations
non-U.S. stockholder
of common stock made by or through the U.S. office of a
broker is generally subject to information reporting and backup
withholding unless the
non-U.S. stockholder
certifies under penalties of perjury that it is not a
U.S. person and satisfies certain other requirements, or
otherwise establishes an exemption from information reporting
and backup withholding.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts
withheld under the backup withholding rules may be refunded or
credited against the stockholders federal income tax
liability if certain required information is furnished to the
IRS. Stockholders should consult their own tax advisors
regarding application of backup withholding to them and the
availability of, and procedure for obtaining an exemption from,
backup withholding.
For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012, a
U.S. withholding tax at a 30% rate will be imposed on
dividends and proceeds of sale in respect of our common stock
received by U.S. stockholders who own their stock through
foreign accounts or foreign intermediaries if certain disclosure
requirements related to U.S. accounts or ownership are not
satisfied. We will not pay any additional amounts in respect of
any amounts withheld.
OTHER TAX
CONSEQUENCES
Tax aspects of
our investments in our operating partnership and subsidiary
partnerships
The following discussion summarizes certain federal income tax
considerations applicable to our direct or indirect investments
in any subsidiary partnership or limited liability company that
is treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. Our
operating partnership currently is a disregarded entity for
federal income tax purposes because we own 100% of the equity
interests in our operating partnership. If our operating
partnership admits other limited partners, our operating
partnership will be treated as a partnership for federal income
tax purposes and will be subject to taxation as described below.
We may form or acquire interests in other partnerships in the
future. The discussion does not cover state or local tax laws or
any federal tax laws other than income tax laws.
Classification as Partnerships.
We will be
entitled to include in our income our distributive share of each
Partnerships income and to deduct our distributive share
of each Partnerships losses only if such Partnership is
classified for federal income tax purposes as a partnership (or
an entity that is disregarded for federal income tax purposes if
the entity has only one owner or member) rather than as a
corporation or an association taxable as a corporation. An
unincorporated entity with at least two owners or members will
be classified as a partnership, rather than as a corporation,
for federal income tax purposes if it:
|
|
Ø
|
is treated as a partnership under the Treasury Regulations
relating to entity classification (the
check-the-box
regulations); and
|
|
Ø
|
is not a publicly-traded partnership.
|
Under the
check-the-box
regulations, an unincorporated entity with at least two owners
or members may elect to be classified either as an association
taxable as a corporation or as a partnership. If such an entity
fails to make an election, it generally will be treated as a
partnership (or an entity that is disregarded for federal income
tax purposes if the entity has only one owner or member) for
federal income tax purposes. Each Partnership intends to be
classified as a partnership for federal income tax purposes and
no Partnership will elect to be treated as an association
taxable as a corporation under the
check-the-box
regulations.
A publicly-traded partnership is a partnership whose interests
are traded on an established securities market or are readily
tradable on a secondary market or the substantial equivalent
thereof. A publicly-traded partnership will not, however, be
treated as a corporation for any taxable year if, for each
taxable year beginning after December 31, 1987 in which it
was classified as a publicly-traded
179
Material federal
income tax considerations
partnership, 90% or more of the partnerships gross income
for such year consists of certain passive-type income, including
real property rents, gains from the sale or other disposition of
real property, interest, and dividends, or (the 90%
passive income exception). Treasury regulations (the
PTP regulations) provide limited safe harbors from
the definition of a publicly-traded partnership. Pursuant to one
of those safe harbors (the private placement
exclusion), interests in a partnership will not be treated
as readily tradable on a secondary market or the substantial
equivalent thereof if (1) all interests in the partnership
were issued in a transaction or transactions that were not
required to be registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, and (2) the partnership does not have more than
100 partners at any time during the partnerships taxable
year. In determining the number of partners in a partnership, a
person owning an interest in a partnership, grantor trust, or
S corporation that owns an interest in the partnership is
treated as a partner in such partnership only if
(1) substantially all of the value of the owners
interest in the entity is attributable to the entitys
direct or indirect interest in the partnership and (2) a
principal purpose of the use of the entity is to permit the
partnership to satisfy the 100-partner limitation. Our operating
partnership is expected to qualify for the private placement
exclusion. If our operating partnership were a publicly-traded
partnership, we believe that our operating partnership would
have sufficient qualifying income to satisfy the 90% passive
income exception and thus would continue to be taxed as a
partnership for federal income tax purposes.
We have not requested, and do not intend to request, a ruling
from the IRS that our operating partnership will be classified
as a disregarded entity or a partnership for federal income tax
purposes. If for any reason our operating partnership were
taxable as a corporation, rather than as a disregarded entity or
a partnership, for federal income tax purposes, we likely would
not be able to qualify as a REIT unless we qualified for certain
relief provisions. See Gross Income Tests and
Asset Tests. In addition, any change in a
Partnerships status for tax purposes might be treated as a
taxable event, in which case we might incur tax liability
without any related cash distribution. See
Distribution Requirements. Further, items of
income and deduction of such Partnership would not pass through
to its partners, and its partners would be treated as
stockholders for tax purposes. Consequently, such Partnership
would be required to pay income tax at corporate rates on its
net income, and distributions to its partners would constitute
dividends that would not be deductible in computing such
Partnerships taxable income.
INCOME TAXATION
OF PARTNERSHIPS AND THEIR PARTNERS
Partners, not the Partnerships, Subject to
Tax.
A partnership is not a taxable entity for
federal income tax purposes. Rather, we are required to take
into account our allocable share of each Partnerships
income, gains, losses, deductions, and credits for any taxable
year of such Partnership ending within or with our taxable year,
without regard to whether we have received or will receive any
distribution from such Partnership.
Partnership Allocations.
Although a
partnership agreement generally will determine the allocation of
income and losses among partners, such allocations will be
disregarded for tax purposes if they do not comply with the
provisions of the federal income tax laws governing partnership
allocations. If an allocation is not recognized for federal
income tax purposes, the item subject to the allocation will be
reallocated in accordance with the partners interests in
the partnership, which will be determined by taking into account
all of the facts and circumstances relating to the economic
arrangement of the partners with respect to such item. Each
Partnerships allocations of taxable income, gain, and loss
are intended to comply with the requirements of the federal
income tax laws governing partnership allocations.
Tax Allocations With Respect to Contributed
Properties.
Income, gain, loss, and deduction
attributable to appreciated or depreciated property that is
contributed to a partnership in exchange for an interest in the
partnership must be allocated in a manner such that the
contributing partner is
180
Material federal
income tax considerations
charged with, or benefits from, respectively, the unrealized
gain or unrealized loss associated with the property at the time
of the contribution. The amount of such unrealized gain or
unrealized loss (built-in gain or built-in
loss) is generally equal to the difference between the
fair market value of the contributed property at the time of
contribution and the adjusted tax basis of such property at the
time of contribution (a book-tax difference). Any
property purchased by our operating partnership for cash
initially will have an adjusted tax basis equal to its fair
market value, resulting in no book-tax difference. In the
future, however, our operating partnership may admit partners in
exchange for a contribution of appreciated or depreciated
property, resulting in book-tax differences. Such allocations
are solely for federal income tax purposes and do not affect the
book capital accounts or other economic or legal arrangements
among the partners.
Under the Treasury Regulations, we are required to use a
reasonable method for allocating items with respect
to which there is a book-tax difference. Under certain available
allocation methods, the carryover basis of contributed property
in the hands of our operating partnership would cause us to be
allocated lower amounts of depreciation deductions for tax
purposes than would be allocated to us if all contributed
properties were to have a tax basis equal to their fair market
value at the time of the contribution, and a sale of that
portion of our operating partnerships properties which
have a carryover basis could cause us to be allocated taxable
gain in excess of the economic or book gain allocated to us as a
result of such sale, with a corresponding benefit to the
contributing partners. As a result of the foregoing allocations,
we may recognize taxable income in excess of cash proceeds in
the event of a sale or other disposition of property, which
might adversely affect our ability to comply with the REIT
distribution requirements and may result in a greater portion of
our distributions being taxed as dividends. We have not yet
decided what method will be used to account for book-tax
differences.
Basis in Partnership Interest.
Our adjusted
tax basis in our partnership interest in our operating
partnership generally is equal to:
|
|
Ø
|
the amount of cash and the basis of any other property
contributed by us to our operating partnership;
|
|
Ø
|
increased by our allocable share of our operating
partnerships income and our allocable share of
indebtedness of our operating partnership; and
|
|
Ø
|
reduced, but not below zero, by our allocable share of our
operating partnerships loss and the amount of cash
distributed to us, and by constructive distributions resulting
from a reduction in our share of indebtedness of our operating
partnership.
|
If the allocation of our distributive share of our operating
partnerships loss would reduce the adjusted tax basis of
our partnership interest below zero, the recognition of such
loss will be deferred until such time as the recognition of such
loss would not reduce our adjusted tax basis below zero. To the
extent that our operating partnerships distributions, or
any decrease in our share of the indebtedness of our operating
partnership, which is considered a constructive cash
distribution to the partners, reduce our adjusted tax basis
below zero, such distributions will constitute taxable income to
us. Such distributions and constructive distributions normally
will be characterized as long-term capital gain.
Depreciation Deductions Available to Our Operating
Partnership.
To the extent that our operating
partnership acquires its properties in exchange for cash, its
initial basis in such properties for federal income tax purposes
generally will be equal to the purchase price paid by our
operating partnership. Our operating partnerships initial
basis in properties acquired in exchange for units in our
operating partnership should be the same as the
transferors basis in such properties on the date of
acquisition by our operating partnership. Although the law is
not entirely clear, our operating partnership generally will
depreciate such depreciable property for federal income tax
purposes over the same remaining useful lives and under the same
methods used by the transferors. Our operating
partnerships tax depreciation deductions will be allocated
among the partners in accordance with their respective
181
Material federal
income tax considerations
interests in our operating partnership, except to the extent
that our operating partnership is required under the federal
income tax laws governing partnership allocations to use a
method for allocating tax depreciation deductions attributable
to contributed properties that results in our receiving a
disproportionate share of such deductions.
SALE OF A
PARTNERSHIPS PROPERTY
Generally, any gain realized by a Partnership on the sale of
property held by the Partnership for more than one year will be
long-term capital gain, except for any portion of such gain that
is treated as depreciation or cost recovery recapture. Any gain
or loss recognized by a Partnership on the disposition of
contributed properties will be allocated first to the partners
of the Partnership who contributed such properties to the extent
of their built-in gain or loss on those properties for federal
income tax purposes. The partners built-in gain or loss on
such contributed properties will equal the difference between
the partners proportionate share of the book value of
those properties and the partners tax basis allocable to
those properties at the time of the contribution. Any remaining
gain or loss recognized by the Partnership on the disposition of
the contributed properties, and any gain or loss recognized by
the Partnership on the disposition of the other properties, will
be allocated among the partners in accordance with their
respective percentage interests in the Partnership.
Our share of any gain realized by a Partnership on the sale of
any property held by the Partnership as inventory or other
property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary
course of the Partnerships trade or business will be
treated as income from a prohibited transaction that is subject
to a 100% penalty tax. Such prohibited transaction income also
may have an adverse effect upon our ability to satisfy the
income tests for REIT status. See Gross Income
Tests. We do not presently intend to acquire or hold or to
allow any Partnership to acquire or hold any property that
represents inventory or other property held primarily for sale
to customers in the ordinary course of our or such
Partnerships trade or business.
SUNSET OF REDUCED
TAX RATE PROVISIONS
Several of the tax considerations described herein are subject
to a sunset provision. The sunset provisions generally provide
that for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2010,
certain provisions that are currently in the Code will revert
back to a prior version of those provisions. These provisions
include provisions related to the reduced maximum income tax
rate for long-term capital gains of 15% (rather than 20%) for
taxpayers taxed at individual rates, the application of the 15%
tax rate to qualified dividend income, and certain other tax
rate provisions described herein. The impact of this reversion
is not discussed herein. Consequently, prospective stockholders
should consult their own tax advisors regarding the effect of
sunset provisions on an investment in our common stock.
STATE AND LOCAL
TAXES
We
and/or
you may be subject to taxation by various states and localities,
including those in which we or a stockholder transacts business,
owns property or resides. The state and local tax treatment may
differ from the federal income tax treatment described above.
Consequently, you should consult your own tax advisors regarding
the effect of state and local tax laws upon an investment in our
common stock.
182
A fiduciary of a pension, profit sharing, retirement or other
employee benefit plan, or plan, subject to the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, or ERISA,
should consider the fiduciary standards under ERISA in the
context of the plans particular circumstances before
authorizing an investment of a portion of such plans
assets in the common stock. Accordingly, such fiduciary should
consider (i) whether the investment satisfies the
diversification requirements of Section 404(a)(1)(C) of
ERISA, (ii) whether the investment is in accordance with
the documents and instruments governing the plan as required by
Section 404(a)(1)(D) of ERISA, and (iii) whether the
investment is prudent under ERISA. In addition to the imposition
of general fiduciary standards of investment prudence and
diversification, ERISA, and the corresponding provisions of the
Code, prohibit a wide range of transactions involving the assets
of the plan and persons who have certain specified relationships
to the plan (parties in interest within the meaning
of ERISA, disqualified persons within the meaning of
the Code). Thus, a plan fiduciary considering an investment in
our common stock also should consider whether the acquisition or
the continued holding of the shares might constitute or give
rise to a direct or indirect prohibited transaction that is not
subject to an exemption issued by the Department of Labor, or
the DOL. Similar restrictions apply to many governmental and
foreign plans which are not subject to ERISA. Thus, those
considering investing in the shares on behalf of such a plan
should consider whether the acquisition or the continued holding
of the shares might violate any such similar restrictions.
The DOL has issued final regulations, or the DOL Regulations, as
to what constitutes assets of an employee benefit plan under
ERISA. Under the DOL Regulations, if a plan acquires an equity
interest in an entity, which interest is neither a
publicly offered security nor a security issued by
an investment company registered under the Investment Company
Act, the plans assets would include, for purposes of the
fiduciary responsibility provision of ERISA, both the equity
interest and an undivided interest in each of the entitys
underlying assets unless certain specified exceptions apply. The
DOL Regulations define a publicly offered security as a security
that is widely held, freely
transferable, and either part of a class of securities
registered under the Exchange Act, or sold pursuant to an
effective registration statement under the Securities Act
(provided the securities are registered under the Exchange Act
within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year of the
issuer during which the public offering occurred). The shares
are being sold in an offering registered under the Securities
Act and will be registered under the Exchange Act.
The DOL Regulations provide that a security is widely
held only if it is part of a class of securities that is
owned by 100 or more investors independent of the issuer and of
one another. A security will not fail to be widely
held because the number of independent investors falls
below 100 subsequent to the initial public offering as a result
of events beyond the issuers control. We expect our common
stock to be widely held upon completion of this
offering.
The DOL Regulations provide that whether a security is
freely transferable is a factual question to be
determined on the basis of all relevant facts and circumstances.
The DOL Regulations further provide that when a security is part
of an offering in which the minimum investment is $10,000 or
less, as is the case with this offering, certain restrictions
ordinarily will not, alone or in combination, affect the finding
that such securities are freely transferable. We
believe that the restrictions imposed under our charter on the
transfer of our shares are limited to the restrictions on
transfer generally permitted under the DOL Regulations and are
not likely to result in the failure of the common stock to be
freely transferable. The DOL Regulations only
establish a presumption in favor of the finding of free
transferability, and, therefore, no assurance can be given that
the DOL will not reach a contrary conclusion.
183
ERISA
considerations
Accordingly, we believe that our common stock will be publicly
offered securities for purposes of the DOL Regulations and that
our assets will not be deemed to be plan assets of
any plan that invests in our common stock.
Each holder of our common stock will be deemed to have
represented and agreed that its purchase and holding of such
common stock (or any interest therein) will not constitute or
result in a non-exempt prohibited transaction under ERISA or
Section 4975 of the Code.
184
Underwriting
Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the
underwriting agreement to be dated on or
about ,
2010, between us, our operating partnership, and
Jefferies & Company, Inc. and Stifel,
Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, as representatives
of the several underwriters, we have agreed to sell to the
underwriters and the underwriters have severally agreed to
purchase from us, the number of shares of common stock indicated
in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
shares of
|
|
Underwriter
|
|
common
stock
|
|
|
|
|
Jefferies & Company, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated
|
|
|
|
|
Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
8,750,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jefferies & Company, Inc. and Stifel,
Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated are acting as joint
book-running managers of this offering and as representatives of
the underwriters named above. Morgan Keegan & Company,
Inc. is acting as a co-manager of this offering.
The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the
several underwriters are subject to certain conditions precedent
such as the receipt by the underwriters of officers
certificates and legal opinions and approval of certain legal
matters by their counsel. The underwriting agreement provides
that the underwriters will purchase all of the shares if any of
them are purchased. If an underwriter defaults, the underwriting
agreement provides that the purchase commitments of the
nondefaulting underwriters may be increased or the underwriting
agreement may be terminated. We and our operating partnership
have agreed to indemnify the underwriters and certain of their
controlling persons against certain liabilities, including
liabilities under the Securities Act, and to contribute to
payments that the underwriters may be required to make in
respect of those liabilities.
The underwriters have advised us that they currently intend to
make a market in the shares of common stock. However, the
underwriters are not obligated to do so and may discontinue any
market-making activities at any time without notice. No
assurance can be given as to the liquidity of the trading market
for the shares of common stock.
The underwriters are offering the shares of common stock subject
to their acceptance of the shares from us and subject to prior
sale. The underwriters reserve the right to withdraw, cancel or
modify offers to the public and to reject orders in whole or in
part. In addition, the underwriters have advised us that they do
not expect sales to accounts over which they have discretionary
authority to exceed 5% of the shares of common stock being
offered.
COMMISSION AND
EXPENSES
The underwriters have advised us that they propose to offer the
shares of common stock to the public at the initial public
offering price set forth on the cover page of this prospectus
and to certain dealers at that price less a concession not in
excess of $ per share. The
underwriters may allow, and certain dealers may reallow, a
discount from the concession not in excess of
$ per share to certain brokers and
dealers. After the offering, the initial public offering price,
concession and reallowance to dealers may be reduced by the
representatives. No such reduction will change the amount of
proceeds to be received by us as set forth on the cover page of
this prospectus.
185
Underwriting
The following table shows the public offering price, the
underwriting discounts and commissions that we are to pay the
underwriters and the proceeds, before expenses, to us in
connection with this offering. Such amounts are shown assuming
both no exercise and full exercise of the underwriters
option to purchase additional shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
With
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
With
|
|
|
|
option to
|
|
|
option to
|
|
|
option to
|
|
|
option to
|
|
|
|
purchase
|
|
|
purchase
|
|
|
purchase
|
|
|
purchase
|
|
|
|
additional
|
|
|
additional
|
|
|
additional
|
|
|
additional
|
|
|
|
shares
|
|
|
shares
|
|
|
shares
|
|
|
shares
|
|
|
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting discounts and commissions paid by us
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds to us, before expenses
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
We estimate expenses payable by us in connection with this
offering, other than the underwriting discounts and commissions
referred to above, will be approximately $2.6 million.
DETERMINATION OF
OFFERING PRICE
Prior to the offering, there has not been a public market for
our shares of common stock. Consequently, the initial public
offering price for our shares of common stock will be determined
by negotiations between us and the underwriters. Among the
factors to be considered in these negotiations will be
prevailing market conditions, our financial information, market
valuations of other companies that we and the underwriters
believe to be comparable to us, estimates of our business
potential, the present state of our development and other
factors deemed relevant.
We offer no assurances that the initial public offering price
will correspond to the price at which the shares of common stock
will trade in the public market subsequent to the offering or
that an active trading market for the shares of common stock
will develop and continue after the offering.
LISTING
Our shares of common stock have been approved for listing on the
New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol
LRP. We intend to apply to have the warrants
approved for listing on the NYSE or NYSE Amex under the trading
symbol LRP WS.
OPTION TO
PURCHASE ADDITIONAL SHARES
We have granted to the underwriters an option, exercisable for
30 days from the date of this prospectus, to purchase up to
an aggregate of 1,312,500 additional shares of common stock at
the public offering price set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus, less the underwriting discounts and commissions. If
the underwriters exercise this option, each underwriter will be
obligated, subject to specified conditions, to purchase a number
of additional shares proportionate to that underwriters
initial purchase commitment as indicated in the table above.
This option may be exercised only if the underwriters sell more
shares than the total number set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus. In addition, if the underwriters exercise the
option, the total number of warrants we may issue in connection
with this offering will increase by an amount equal to the total
number of additional shares of our common stock purchased by the
underwriters in connection with such exercise.
186
Underwriting
NO SALES OF
SIMILAR SECURITIES
We, our operating partnership, our officers, directors and
holders of all or substantially all our outstanding shares and
other securities have agreed, subject to specified exceptions,
not to directly or indirectly:
|
|
Ø
|
sell, offer, contract or grant any option to sell (including any
short sale), pledge, transfer, establish an open put
equivalent position within the meaning of
Rule 16a-l(h)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or
|
|
Ø
|
otherwise dispose of any shares of common stock, options or
warrants to acquire shares of common stock, or securities
exchangeable or exercisable for or convertible into shares of
common stock, including, without limitation, OP units, currently
or hereafter owned either of record or beneficially, or
|
|
Ø
|
publicly announce an intention to do any of the foregoing for a
period of 180 days after the date of this prospectus
without the prior written consent of Jefferies &
Company, Inc.
|
This restriction terminates after the close of trading of the
shares of common stock on and including the 180 days after
the date of this prospectus. However, subject to certain
exceptions, in the event that either:
|
|
Ø
|
during the last 17 days of the 180-day restricted period,
we issue an earnings release or material news or a material
event relating to us occurs, or
|
|
Ø
|
prior to the expiration of the 180-day restricted period, we
announce that we will release earnings results during the
16-day
period beginning on the last day of the 180-day restricted
period,
|
then in either case the expiration of the 180-day restricted
period will be extended until the expiration of the
18-day
period beginning on the date of the issuance of an earnings
release or the occurrence of the material news or event, as
applicable, unless Jefferies & Company, Inc. waives,
in writing, such an extension.
Jefferies & Company, Inc. may, in its sole discretion
and at any time or from time to time before the termination of
the 180-day period, without public notice, release all or any
portion of the securities subject to
lock-up
agreements. There are no existing agreements between the
underwriters and any of our stockholders who will execute a
lock-up
agreement, providing consent to the sale of shares prior to the
expiration of the
lock-up
period.
STABILIZATION
The underwriters have advised us that, pursuant to
Regulation M under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, certain persons participating in the offering may
engage in transactions, including overallotment, stabilizing
bids, syndicate covering transactions or the imposition of
penalty bids, which may have the effect of stabilizing or
maintaining the market price of the shares of common stock at a
level above that which might otherwise prevail in the open
market. Overallotment involves syndicate sales in excess of the
offering size, which creates a syndicate short position.
Covered short sales are sales made in an amount not
greater than the underwriters option to purchase
additional shares of common stock in this offering. The
underwriters may close out any covered short position by either
exercising their option to purchase additional shares of common
stock or purchasing shares of common stock in the open market.
In determining the source of shares to close out the covered
short position, the underwriters will consider, among other
things, the price of shares available for purchase in the open
market as compared to the price at which they may purchase
shares through the option to purchase additional shares.
Naked short sales are sales in excess of the option
to purchase additional shares of common stock. The underwriters
must close out any naked short position by purchasing shares in
the open market. A naked short position is more likely to be
created if the underwriters are concerned that there may be
downward pressure on the price of the shares of common stock in
the
187
Underwriting
open market after pricing that could adversely affect investors
who purchase in this offering. A stabilizing bid is a bid for
the purchase of shares of common stock on behalf of the
underwriters for the purpose of fixing or maintaining the price
of the shares of common stock. A syndicate covering transaction
is the bid for or the purchase of shares of common stock on
behalf of the underwriters to reduce a short position incurred
by the underwriters in connection with the offering. A penalty
bid is an arrangement permitting the underwriters to reclaim the
selling concession otherwise accruing to a syndicate member in
connection with the offering if the shares originally sold by
such syndicate member are purchased in a syndicate covering
transaction and therefore have not been effectively placed by
such syndicate member. Neither we nor any of the underwriters
makes any representation or prediction as to the direction or
magnitude of any effect that the transactions described above
may have on the price of our shares of common stock. The
underwriters are not obligated to engage in these activities
and, if commenced, any of the activities may be discontinued at
any time.
ELECTRONIC
DISTRIBUTION
A prospectus in electronic format may be made available by
e-mail
or on
the web sites or through online services maintained by one or
more of the underwriters or their affiliates. In those cases,
prospective investors may view offering terms online and may be
allowed to place orders online. The underwriters may agree with
us to allocate a specific number of shares of common stock for
sale to online brokerage account holders. Any such allocation
for online distributions will be made by the underwriters on the
same basis as other allocations. Other than the prospectus in
electronic format, the information on the underwriters web
sites and any information contained in any other web site
maintained by any of the underwriters is not part of this
prospectus, has not been approved
and/or
endorsed by us or the underwriters and should not be relied upon
by investors.
DIRECTED SHARE
PROGRAM
At our request, the underwriters have reserved for sale at the
initial public offering price a portion of the shares of common
stock for employees, directors and other persons associated with
us who have expressed an interest in purchasing shares in the
offering. The number of shares of common stock available for
sale to the general public in the offering will be reduced to
the extent these persons purchase the directed shares in the
program. Any directed shares not so purchased will be offered by
the underwriters to the general public on the same terms as the
other shares. We and our operating partnership have agreed to
indemnify the underwriters against certain liabilities and
expenses, including liabilities under the Securities Act, in
connection with sales of the directed shares.
AFFILIATIONS
The underwriters or their affiliates from time to time may in
the future provide investment banking, commercial lending and
financial advisory services to us and our affiliates in the
ordinary course of business. The underwriters and their
affiliates, as applicable, will receive customary compensation
and reimbursement of expenses in connection with such services.
DISCLAIMERS ABOUT
NON-U.S.
JURISDICTIONS
European Economic
Area
In relation to each member state of the European Economic Area
which has implemented the Prospectus Directive (as defined
below) (each, a Relevant Member State), with effect
from and including the date on which the Prospectus Directive is
implemented in that Relevant Member State (the Relevant
Implementation Date), an offer to the public of any
securities which are the subject of this prospectus may not be
made in that Relevant Member State prior to the publication of a
prospectus in
188
Underwriting
relation to the securities which has either been approved by the
competent authority in that Relevant Member State or, where
appropriate, approved in another Relevant Member State and
notified to the competent authority in that Relevant Member
State, all in accordance with the Prospectus Directive, except
that, with effect from and including the Relevant Implementation
Date, an offer of securities to the public in that Relevant
Member State may be made at any time:
(a) to any legal entity which is authorised or
regulated to operate in the financial markets or, if not so
authorised or regulated, whose corporate purpose is solely to
invest in securities;
(b) to any legal entity which has two or more of
(1) an average of at least 250 employees during the
last financial year; (2) a total balance sheet of more than
43,000,000 and (3) an annual net turnover of more
than 50,000,000, as shown in its last annual or
consolidated accounts;
(c) to fewer than 100 natural or legal persons per
Relevant Member State (other than qualified investors as defined
below) subject to obtaining the prior consent of the
representatives of the underwriters for any such offer; or
(d) in any other circumstances which do not require
the publication by the Company of a prospectus pursuant to
Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive.
Each purchaser of securities which are the subject of this
prospectus located within a Relevant Member State will be deemed
to have represented, acknowledged and agreed that is it is a
qualified investor within the meaning of
Article 2(1)(e) of the Prospectus Directive.
For the purposes of this provision, the expression an
offer to the public in relation to any securities in
any Relevant Member State means the communication in any form
and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the
offer and the securities to be offered so as to enable an
investor to decide to purchase or subscribe the securities, as
the same may be varied in that Member State by any measure
implementing the Prospectus Directive in that Member State and
the expression Prospectus Directive means Directive
2003/71/EC and includes any relevant implementing measure in
each Relevant Member State.
United
Kingdom
This prospectus is only being distributed to, and is only
directed at, persons in the United Kingdom that are qualified
investors within the meaning of Article 2(1)(e) of the
Prospectus Directive that are also (i) investment
professionals falling within Article 19(5) of the Financial
Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005
(the Order) or (ii) high net worth entities,
and other persons to whom it may lawfully be communicated,
falling within Article 49(2)(a) to (d) of the Order
(each such person being referred to as a relevant
person).
This prospectus and its contents are confidential and should not
be distributed, published or reproduced (in whole or in part) or
disclosed by recipients to any other persons in the United
Kingdom. Any person in the United Kingdom that is not a relevant
person should not act or rely on this document or any of its
contents.
Germany
Any offer or solicitation of securities within Germany must be
in full compliance with the German Securities Prospectus Act
(
WertpapierprospektgesetzWpPG
). The offer and
solicitation of securities to the public in Germany requires the
publication of a prospectus that has to be filed with and
approved by the German Federal Financial Services Supervisory
Authority (
Bundesanstalt für
FinanzdienstleistungsaufsichtBaFin
). This prospectus
has not been and will not be submitted for filing
189
Underwriting
and approval to the BaFin and, consequently, will not be
published. Therefore, this prospectus does not constitute a
public offer under the German Securities Prospectus Act
(
Wertpapierprospektgesetz
). This prospectus and any other
document relating to the securities, as well as any information
contained therein, must therefore not be supplied to the public
in Germany or used in connection with any offer for subscription
of the securities to the public in Germany, any public marketing
of the securities or any public solicitation for offers to
subscribe for or otherwise acquire the securities. This
prospectus and other offering materials relating to the offer of
the securities are strictly confidential and may not be
distributed to any person or entity other than the designated
recipients hereof.
Australia
This prospectus is not a disclosure document for the purposes of
Australias Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) of Australia, or
Corporations Act, has not been lodged with the Australian
Securities & Investments Commission and is only
directed to the categories of exempt persons set out below.
Accordingly, if you receive this prospectus in Australia:
You confirm and warrant that you are either:
|
|
Ø
|
a sophisticated investor under
section 708(8)(a) or (b) of the Corporations Act;
|
|
Ø
|
a sophisticated investor under
section 708(8)(c) or (d) of the Corporations Act and
that you have provided an accountants certificate to the
company which complies with the requirements of
section 708(8)(c)(i) or (ii) of the Corporations Act
and related regulations before the offer has been made; or
|
|
Ø
|
professional investor within the meaning of
section 708(11)(a) or (b) of the Corporations Act.
|
To the extent that you are unable to confirm or warrant that you
are an exempt sophisticated investor or professional investor
under the Corporations Act any offer made to you under this
prospectus is void and incapable of acceptance.
You warrant and agree that you will not offer any of the shares
issued to you pursuant to this prospectus for resale in
Australia within 12 months of those shares being issued
unless any such resale offer is exempt from the requirement to
issue a disclosure document under section 708 of the
Corporations Act.
France
This prospectus has not been, and will not be, submitted to the
clearance procedures of the
Autorité des marchés
financiers
(the AMF) in France and may not be
directly or indirectly released, issued, or distributed to the
public in France, or used in connection with any offer for
subscription or sale or the securities to the public in France,
in each case within the meaning of Article L.
411-1
of the
French
Code monétaire et financier
(the French
Financial and Monetary Code).
The securities have not been, and will not be, offered or sold
to the public in France, directly or indirectly, and will only
be offered or sold in France (i) to qualified investors
(
investisseurs qualifiés
) investing for their own
account, in accordance with all applicable rules and
regulations, and in particular in accordance with
Articles L.
411-2
and D.
411-2
of the
French Financial and Monetary Code; (ii) to investment
services providers authorized to engage in portfolio investment
on behalf of third parties, in accordance with
Article L.411-2
of the French Financial and Monetary Code; or (iii) in a
transaction that, in accordance with all applicable rules and
regulations, does not otherwise constitute an offer to the
public (
appel public à
lépargne
) in France within the meaning of
Article L.411-1
of the French Financial and Monetary Code.
190
Underwriting
This prospectus is not to be further distributed or reproduced
(in whole or in part) in France by any recipient, and this
prospectus has been distributed to the recipient on the
understanding that such recipient is a qualified investor or
otherwise meets the requirements set forth above, and will only
participate in the issue or sale of the securities for their own
account, and undertakes not to transfer, directly or indirectly,
the securities to the public in France, other than in compliance
with all applicable laws and regulations and in particular with
Articles L.411-1,
L.411-2, D.411-1 and D.411-2 of the French Financial and
Monetary Code.
Japan
The offering has not been and will not be registered under the
Financial Instruments and Exchange Law of Japan (Law No. 25
of 1948 of Japan, as amended), or FIEL, and the underwriters
will not offer or sell any securities, directly or indirectly,
in Japan or to, or for the benefit of, any resident of Japan
(which term as used herein means, unless otherwise provided
herein, any person resident in Japan, including any corporation
or other entity organized under the laws of Japan), or to others
for re-offering or resale, directly or indirectly, in Japan or
to a resident of Japan, except pursuant to an exemption from the
registration requirements of, and otherwise in compliance with,
the FIEL and any other applicable laws, regulations and
ministerial guidelines of Japan.
Hong
Kong
No securities have been offered or sold, and no securities may
be offered or sold, in Hong Kong, by means of any document,
other than to persons whose ordinary business is to buy or sell
shares or debentures, whether as principal or agent; or to
professional investors as defined in the Securities
and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571) of Hong Kong and any rules
made under that Ordinance; or in other circumstances which do
not result in the document being a prospectus as
defined in the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) of Hong Kong
or which do not constitute an offer to the public within the
meaning of the Companies Ordinance (Cap.32) of Hong Kong. No
document, invitation or advertisement relating to the securities
has been issued or may be issued or may be in the possession of
any person for the purpose of issue (in each case whether in
Hong Kong or elsewhere), which is directed at, or the contents
of which are likely to be accessed or read by, the public of
Hong Kong (except if permitted under the securities laws of Hong
Kong) other than with respect to securities which are or are
intended to be disposed of only to persons outside Hong Kong or
only to professional investors as defined in the
Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571) of Hong Kong
and any rules made under that Ordinance.
This prospectus has not been registered with the Registrar of
Companies in Hong Kong. Accordingly, this prospectus may not be
issued, circulated or distributed in Hong Kong, and the
securities may not be offered for subscription to members of the
public in Hong Kong. Each person acquiring the securities will
be required, and is deemed by the acquisition of the securities,
to confirm that he is aware of the restriction on offers of the
securities described in this prospectus and the relevant
offering documents and that he is not acquiring, and has not
been offered any securities in circumstances that contravene any
such restrictions.
Singapore
This prospectus has not been and will not be lodged or
registered with the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Accordingly, this prospectus and any other document or material
in connection with the offer or sale, or the invitation for
subscription or purchase of the securities may not be issued,
circulated or distributed, nor may the securities be offered or
sold, or be made the subject of an invitation for subscription
or purchase, whether directly or indirectly, to the public or
any member of the public in Singapore other than (i) to an
institutional investor under Section 274 of the Securities
and
191
Underwriting
Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore (the
SFA), (ii) to a relevant person as defined
under Section 275(2), or any person pursuant to
Section 275(1A) of the SFA, and in accordance with the
conditions, specified in Section 275 of the SFA, or
(iii) otherwise pursuant to, and in accordance with the
conditions of any other applicable provision of the SFA.
Where the securities are subscribed or purchased under
Section 275 of the SFA by a relevant person which is:
(a) a corporation (which is not an accredited
investor as defined under Section 4A of the SFA) the sole
business of which is to hold investments and the entire share
capital of which is owned by one or more individuals, each of
whom is an accredited investor; or
(b) a trust (where the trustee is not an accredited
investor) whose sole purpose is to hold investments and each
beneficiary is an accredited investor,
shares, debentures and units of shares and debentures of that
corporation or the beneficiaries rights and interest in
that trust shall not be transferable for six months after that
corporation or that trust has acquired the shares under
Section 275 of the SFA except:
(i) to an institutional investor under
Section 274 of the SFA or to a relevant person defined in
Section 275(2) of the SFA, or to any person pursuant to an
offer that is made on terms that such shares, debentures and
units of shares and debentures of that corporation or such
rights and interest in that trust are acquired at a
consideration of not less than $200,000 (or its equivalent in a
foreign currency) for each transaction, whether such amount is
to be paid for in cash or by exchange of securities or other
assets, and further for corporations, in accordance with the
conditions, specified in Section 275 of the SFA;
(ii) where no consideration is given for the
transfer; or
(iii) where the transfer is by operation of law.
192
Legal matters
Certain legal matters in connection with this offering will be
passed upon for us by Hunton & Williams LLP and for
the underwriters by Clifford Chance US LLP, New York, New York.
Venable LLP will issue an opinion to us regarding certain
matters of Maryland law, including the validity of the common
stock offered by this prospectus. Hunton & Williams
LLP and Clifford Chance US LLP may rely as to certain matters of
Maryland law upon the opinion of Venable LLP.
Experts
The consolidated financial statements of Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. as of June 30, 2010 and for the
period from inception (April 7, 2010) to June 30,
2010, and the consolidated financial statements of WSL Holdings
IV, LLC as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for each of
the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2009,
included in this preliminary prospectus have been so included in
reliance on the reports of KPMG LLP, independent registered
public accounting firm, appearing elsewhere herein, and upon the
authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
McGladrey & Pullen, LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, has audited the combined financial statements
of Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolio and Senior Lifestyle Jupiter,
L.P. as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and for the
years then ended as set forth in their reports. We have included
the aforementioned financial statements in this prospectus and
elsewhere in the registration statement in reliance upon the
reports of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP, given on their
authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
Where you can find
more information
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-11,
including exhibits and schedules filed with this registration
statement, under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, with
respect to our common stock to be sold in this offering. This
prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in
the registration statement and exhibits and schedules to the
registration statement. For further information with respect to
our company and our common stock to be sold in this offering,
reference is made to the registration statement, including the
exhibits and schedules to the registration statement. Statements
contained in this prospectus as to the contents of any contract
or other document referred to in this prospectus are not
necessarily complete and, where that contract is an exhibit to
the registration statement, each statement is qualified in all
respects by reference to the exhibit to which the reference
relates. Copies of the registration statement, including the
exhibits and schedules to the registration statement, may be
examined without charge at the public reference unit of the
Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street,
N.E., Unit 1580, Washington, DC 20549. Information about the
operation of the public reference unit may be obtained by
calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0300.
Copies of all or a portion of the registration statement can be
obtained from the public reference unit of the SEC upon payment
of prescribed fees. Our SEC filings, including our registration
statement, are also available to you on the SECs website
www.sec.gov.
As a result of this offering, we will become subject to the
information and reporting requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will file periodic reports
and proxy statements and will make available to our stockholders
quarterly reports for the first three quarters of each fiscal
year containing unaudited interim financial information.
193
Index to financial
statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
|
|
|
F-8
|
|
|
|
|
F-11
|
|
|
|
|
F-13
|
|
|
|
|
F-14
|
|
|
|
|
F-16
|
|
|
|
|
F-17
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WSL Holdings IV, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
|
|
|
|
|
F-21
|
|
|
|
|
F-22
|
|
|
|
|
F-23
|
|
|
|
|
F-24
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolio (SL Bella Terra, LLC, SL
Barrington, LLC, SL Walden, LLC, SL Sage Harbor, LLC, SL Castle
Pointe, LLC and SL Chancellors Village, LLC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-36
|
|
|
|
|
F-37
|
|
|
|
|
F-38
|
|
|
|
|
F-39
|
|
|
|
|
F-44
|
|
|
|
|
F-45
|
|
|
|
|
F-46
|
|
|
|
|
F-47
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-48
|
|
|
|
|
F-49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Lifestyle Jupiter, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-54
|
|
|
|
|
F-55
|
|
|
|
|
F-56
|
|
|
|
|
F-57
|
|
|
|
|
F-62
|
|
|
|
|
F-63
|
|
|
|
|
F-64
|
|
|
|
|
F-65
|
|
|
|
|
F-66
|
|
|
|
|
F-67
|
|
F-2
Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc.
Report of
independent registered public accounting firm
The Board of Directors
Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust Inc. and subsidiary as
of June 30, 2010, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, stockholders deficit, and cash flows for
the period from inception (April 7, 2010) to
June 30, 2010. These consolidated financial statements are
the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust Inc. and
subsidiary as of June 30, 2010, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for the period from inception
(April 7, 2010) to June 30, 2010, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
September 15, 2010
Orlando, Florida
F-3
Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc.
Consolidated balance
sheet
June 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
2,245
|
|
Deferred offering costs
|
|
|
783,531
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
501,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,286,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
619,078
|
|
Payable to sole stockholder
|
|
|
1,143,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,762,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders deficit:
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share; 1,000 shares
authorized; 1,000 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
10
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
990
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(476,915
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders deficit
|
|
|
(475,915
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders deficit
|
|
$
|
1,286,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc.
Consolidated
statement of operations
Inception
(April 7, 2010) to June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from rental operations:
|
|
|
|
|
Rental revenue
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
69,126
|
|
Property acquisition costs
|
|
|
407,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
476,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(476,915
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc.
Consolidated
statement of stockholders deficit
Inception
(April 7, 2010) to June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at inception (April 7, 2010)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Net loss and comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(476,915
|
)
|
|
|
(476,915
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2010
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
(476,915
|
)
|
|
|
(475,915
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc.
Consolidated
statement of cash flows
Inception
(April 7, 2010) to June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash flows used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(476,915
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used for operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in accrued liabilities and payable to sole stockholder
|
|
|
431,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used) for operating activities
|
|
|
(45,699
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by investing activity:
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of deposit
|
|
|
(400,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activity
|
|
|
(400,000
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing activity:
|
|
|
|
|
Advance from sole stockholder
|
|
|
446,944
|
|
Collection of stock subscription receivable
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activity
|
|
|
447,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash
|
|
|
2,245
|
|
Cash at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of period
|
|
$
|
2,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash flow information from
investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized deposits paid by sole stockholder on behalf of the
Company
|
|
$
|
101,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized deferred offering costs including $577,987 paid by
sole stockholder on behalf of the Company
|
|
$
|
783,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc.
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
June 30,
2010
Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust Inc. (the
Company, we, us or
our) was formed as a Maryland corporation on
April 7, 2010. The Company is internally managed and was
organized to acquire, own and actively manage income-producing
senior housing facilities that derive substantially all of their
revenues from private payment sources, generate stable cash
flows and have the potential for long-term capital appreciation.
The Company formed Legacy Healthcare Properties, LP (the
Operating Partnership) on April 16, 2010. The
Company is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership
and plans to conduct substantially all of its business through
the Operating Partnership.
|
|
NOTE 2.
|
SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Below is a discussion of the Companys significant
accounting policies:
Basis of
presentation
The consolidated financial statements include all of the
accounts of the Company as of June 30, 2010 and for the
period from inception (April 7, 2010) to June 30,
2010, presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. All intercompany balances have been
eliminated.
Use of
estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements is in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the consolidated financial statements. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Income
taxes
The Company has elected to be taxed as a pass-through entity
under subchapter S of the Internal Revenue Code, but
intends to revoke the subchapter S election prior to the
closing of the proposed initial public offering and the proposed
concurrent private placement of the Companys common stock,
both of which are discussed in Note 5, Initial Public
Offering and Concurrent Private Placement. The Company
intends to elect to be taxed as a real estate investment trust
(REIT) for federal income tax purposes commencing
with its short taxable year beginning on the date of the
revocation of the subchapter S election and ending on
December 31, 2010. The Company expects to have little or no
taxable income prior to electing REIT status. To qualify as a
REIT, the Company must meet certain organizational and
operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute
at least 90% of the Companys annual REIT taxable income to
its stockholders (which is computed without regard to the
dividends paid deduction or net capital gain and which does not
necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principals). As a REIT,
the Company generally will not be subject to federal income tax
to the extent it distributes its taxable income to its
stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any
taxable year, it will be subject to federal income tax on its
taxable income at regular corporate income tax rates and
generally will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a
REIT for federal income tax purposes for the four taxable years
following the year during which qualification is lost unless the
Internal Revenue Service grants the Company relief under certain
statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely
affect the Companys net income and net cash available for
distribution to stockholders. However, the Company intends to
organize and operate in such a manner as to qualify for
treatment as a REIT.
F-8
Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc.
Business
combinations and property acquisition costs
Effective with our inception, we adopted Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) guidance related to business
combinations and property acquisitions, which requires the
acquiring entity in a business combination or asset purchase to
measure the assets acquired, liabilities assumed (including
contingencies) and any non-controlling interests at their fair
values on the acquisition date. The guidance also requires that
acquisition-related transaction costs be expensed as incurred,
acquired research and development value be capitalized and
acquisition-related restructuring costs be capitalized only if
they meet certain criteria. These costs, totaling $407,789, are
included in property acquisition costs on the accompanying
consolidated statement of operations.
|
|
NOTE
3.
|
DEFERRED OFFERING
COSTS, DEPOSITS AND OTHER PROPERTY ACQUISITION COSTS
|
As described in Note 7 below, the Company expects to
complete the acquisition of certain senior housing facilities
upon completion of its proposed initial public offering and
proposed concurrent private placement. As of June 30, 2010,
the Companys sole stockholder paid deposits and other
property acquisition costs on behalf of the Company of $501,000
associated with the acquisition of these senior housing
facilities. The sole stockholder also paid certain initial
public offering costs on behalf of the Company totaling $577,987.
|
|
NOTE 4.
|
STOCKHOLDERS
DEFICIT
|
Under the Articles of Incorporation of the Company, the total
number of shares authorized for issuance is 1,000 shares of
common stock.
At formation, the Company issued the sole stockholder of the
Company 1,000 shares of common stock at $1.00 per share.
|
|
NOTE 5.
|
INITIAL PUBLIC
OFFERING AND CONCURRENT PRIVATE PLACEMENT
|
The Company proposes to issue and sell in an underwritten
initial public offering shares of its common stock for proposed
gross proceeds of approximately $161.9 million and also
proposes to issue and sell in a concurrent private placement
shares of its common stock for proposed gross proceeds of
$6.0 million.
The Company will reimburse its sole stockholder and his
affiliates for certain
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred by the sole stockholder and his affiliates in
connection with the formation of the Company, the proposed
initial public offering of common stock and the acquisition of
certain senior housing facilities. As of June 30, 2010,
organizational costs and other costs relating to this offering
and the proposed acquisition of the Companys initial
portfolio of facilities incurred by the sole stockholder and his
affiliates were approximately $0.6 million. If the proposed
initial public offering is terminated, the Company will have no
obligation to reimburse the sole stockholder and his affiliates
for any organizational, acquisition or offering costs.
|
|
NOTE 6.
|
RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
|
On April 20, 2010, the Company entered into a consulting
agreement with Mark E. Patten whereby Mr. Patten would
provide financial and accounting services to the Company for
which the Company would pay Mr. Patten a consulting fee,
upon the completion of the Companys proposed initial
public offering, equivalent to his anticipated 2010 annual base
salary pro-rated for the period of months and days worked
pursuant to this arrangement. The term of the agreement expires
on July 31, 2010 and payment under this agreement is
entirely contingent upon the completion of the proposed initial
public offering.
|
|
NOTE 7.
|
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
AND OTHER MATTERS
|
The Company has evaluated the need for disclosures
and/or
adjustments resulting from subsequent events through
September 15, 2010, the date the financial statements were
available to be issued.
F-9
Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc.
Except as described below, this evaluation did not result in any
subsequent events that necessitated disclosures
and/or
adjustments.
Upon completion of the proposed initial public offering and the
proposed concurrent private placement, the Company expects to
complete the acquisition of six senior housing facilities
located in Florida, Illinois, New Jersey, New York and Virginia
for an aggregate contractual purchase price of
$240.0 million excluding transaction costs, including
approximately $81.9 million in cash and the assumption of
approximately $158.1 million of in-place mortgage debt. The
Company expects to pay approximately $3.0 million of
closing costs and assume approximately $15.7 million of
liabilities related to deferred and refundable entrance fees in
connection with the acquisition.
F-10
Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and subsidiaries
Pro forma condensed
consolidated financial information
The accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
balance sheet of Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust Inc.
and its subsidiaries (the Company) as of
June 30, 2010 and the unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated statement of operations of the Company for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and the year ended
December 31, 2009 have been derived from: (i) the
historical audited and unaudited consolidated financial
statements of WSL Holdings IV, LLC (WSL IV), which
the Company has agreed to acquire following the closing of the
Companys initial public offering (the WSL
Acquisition) and which owns five senior housing
facilities; and (ii) the historical audited and unaudited
financial statements of Senior Lifestyle Jupiter, L.P. (SL
Jupiter), which the Company has agreed to acquire
following the closing of the Companys initial public
offering (the SLJ Acquisition and together with the
WSL Acquisition, the WSL/SLJ Acquisition) and which
owns and operates an additional senior housing facility.
The accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
balance sheet as of June 30, 2010 and the unaudited pro
forma condensed consolidated statement of operations as of and
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and the year
ended December 31, 2009 reflect the WSL Acquisition and the
SLJ Acquisition and the subsequent leasing of the facilities to
be acquired by the Company pursuant to new leases for Lake
Barrington Woods, Bella Terra, BaywindeCastle Pointe,
Chancellors Village and Mangrove Bay and the existing
leases for BaywindeSage Harbour and Walden Place (the
Senior Lifestyle Leases), in each case with
affiliates (the Tenants) of Senior Lifestyle
Management, LLC (Senior Lifestyle Management), the
manager that has historically managed these facilities.
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet of
the Company as of June 30, 2010 has been prepared to
reflect the pro forma adjustments to the Companys
historical audited consolidated financial statements to
illustrate the estimated effect of the following transactions as
if they had occurred on June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
the initial public offering of 8,750,000 shares of the
Companys common stock for an assumed initial public
offering price of $18.50 per share, which is the midpoint of the
initial public offering price range shown on the cover of this
prospectus, net of the underwriting discounts and commissions
(the Common Stock Offering), and the offering of
contingent warrants to purchase up to an additional
8,750,000 shares of the Companys common stock, which
warrants would be issued only to investors who purchase shares
of common stock in the Common Stock Offering if certain events
occur and certain conditions are satisfied (the IPO
Warrants);
|
|
|
|
|
(ii)
|
the concurrent private placement of 324,324 shares of the
Companys common stock to the Companys executive
officers at a price per share equal to the initial public
offering price, without payment of any placement fee by the
Company, resulting in an additional $6.0 million of net
proceeds to the Company (the Concurrent Private
Placement and together with the Common Stock Offering, the
Offerings);
|
|
|
(iii)
|
the WSL/SLJ Acquisition, following the closing of the Offerings,
pursuant to which the Company will acquire the six senior
housing facilities it has under contract for approximately
$81.9 million in cash, funded from the net proceeds of the
Offerings, the assumption of approximately $158.1 million
of long-term indebtedness, the payment of approximately
$3.0 million in closing costs and the assumption of
approximately $15.7 million of deposit liabilities related
to deferred and refundable resident entrance fees associated
with the six facilities; and
|
|
|
(iv)
|
the grant by the Company upon completion of the Offerings
pursuant to the Companys 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the
Plan) of an aggregate of 25,000 shares of the
Companys restricted common stock to the Companys
director nominees.
|
The accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
statement of operations of the Company for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009 has
been
F-11
Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and subsidiaries
prepared to illustrate the estimated effect of the transactions
described in items (i) through (iv) above, assuming
such transactions were completed on January 1, 2009 and
also includes the anticipated operating costs for the Company
and estimated lease payments under the Senior Lifestyle Leases.
The accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with
(i) the Companys historical audited consolidated
financial statements and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere
in this prospectus, (ii) the historical audited and
unaudited consolidated financial statements of WSL IV and the
notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this prospectus,
(iii) the historical audited and unaudited financial
statements of SL Jupiter and the notes thereto appearing
elsewhere in this prospectus, and (iv) the Risk
Factors, Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-looking
Statements, and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
sections in this prospectus.
The Company has based its unaudited pro forma adjustments on
available information and assumptions that it believes are
reasonable. These accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated financial statements are presented for
informational purposes only and do not purport to be indicative
of the Companys financial condition or operating results
if the various events and transactions reflected therein had
occurred on the dates, or been in effect during the periods
indicated. These accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated financial statements should not be viewed as
indicative of the Companys future financial condition or
operating results.
F-12
Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and subsidiaries
Unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated balance sheet
as of
June 30, 2010
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering,
Private
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Placement,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPO Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Company
(a)
|
|
|
of SL
Jupiter
(b)
|
|
|
of WSL
IV
(b)
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
Equity
Grants
|
|
|
as
Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27,120
|
|
|
$
|
117,026
|
|
|
$
|
73,971
|
(c)
|
|
$
|
218,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
218,117
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,577
|
|
|
|
3,450
|
|
|
|
3,301
|
(c)
|
|
|
8,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,328
|
|
Land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,362
|
|
|
|
11,780
|
|
|
|
16,568
|
(c)
|
|
|
30,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,710
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,217
|
)
|
|
|
(16,787
|
)
|
|
|
24,004
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
23,842
|
|
|
$
|
115,469
|
|
|
$
|
117,844
|
|
|
$
|
257,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
257,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable (net)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
2,438
|
|
|
|
(2,493
|
)
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
15,815
|
|
|
|
(16,514
|
)
(c)
|
|
|
(84,923
|
)
|
|
|
161,874
|
(d)
|
|
|
72,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84,925
|
)
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,694
|
)
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
1,463
|
|
|
|
(1,937
|
)
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due from affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(254
|
)
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
(c)
|
|
|
1,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,580
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
(318
|
)
(c)
|
|
|
784
|
|
|
|
(784
|
)
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(501
|
)
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
|
$
|
25,743
|
|
|
$
|
136,765
|
|
|
$
|
10,801
|
|
|
$
|
174,596
|
|
|
$
|
156,396
|
|
|
$
|
330,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
(852
|
)
(c)
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
(141
|
)
(d)
|
|
|
478
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
(c)
|
|
|
643
|
|
|
|
(643
|
)
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(501
|
)
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred and refundable entrance fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
15,287
|
|
|
|
(254
|
)
(c)
|
|
|
15,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,735
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,025
|
|
|
|
125,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,763
|
|
|
$
|
34,327
|
|
|
$
|
140,660
|
|
|
$
|
(1,678
|
)
|
|
$
|
175,072
|
|
|
|
(784
|
)
|
|
$
|
174,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
(d)
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
161,787
|
(d)
|
|
|
157,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,694
|
)
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,997
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings (deficit)
|
|
|
(477
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,584
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,895
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,479
|
(c)
|
|
|
(477
|
)
|
|
|
(231
|
)
(d)
|
|
|
(708
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
(476
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,584
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,895
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,479
|
|
|
|
(476
|
)
|
|
$
|
157,180
|
|
|
$
|
156,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
|
$
|
25,743
|
|
|
$
|
136,765
|
|
|
$
|
10,801
|
|
|
$
|
174,596
|
|
|
$
|
156,396
|
|
|
$
|
330,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated balance sheet.
F-13
Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to unaudited
pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet
(a) The historical balance sheet of the Company is as
of June 30, 2010.
(b) The historical balance sheets of WSL IV and SL
Jupiter are as of June 30, 2010.
(c) The WSL/SLJ Acquisition has been presented as a
single transaction for purposes of the pro forma presentation
because WSL IV and SL Jupiter have common ownership. WSL IV is
owned 90% by an affiliate of WSL Holdings Fund IV LLC and 10% by
an affiliate of Senior Lifestyle Management. SL Jupiter is owned
50.1% by affiliates of Senior Lifestyle Management and 49.9% by
an affiliate of WSL Holdings Fund IV LLC. The WSL/SLJ
Acquisition represents a single transaction between affiliates
of WSL Holdings Fund IV LLC and affiliates of Senior Lifestyle
Management, as sellers, and the Company, as purchaser. The
purchase price for the WSL/SLJ Acquisition, which is expected to
occur within 30 days of the completion of the Offerings,
has been allocated to the health care operating assets and
liabilities and between land, buildings and equipment based on
the historical financial statements of both WSL IV and SL
Jupiter and the Companys estimates of fair value. These
allocations are subject to change based on valuation studies
obtained from third party consultants and the final purchase
price allocation. As a result of the WSL/SLJ Acquisition, the
Company may acquire assets with a tax basis that is lower than
their carrying value. The Company has not reflected any deferred
tax liabilities as a result of this transaction relating to this
difference in basis due to its intent to either hold the
facilities for the required ten-year period or to utilize
expected net operating loss carry-forwards to achieve tax
benefits or other tax planning strategies.
The purchase price for the WSL/SLJ Acquisition has been
calculated as follows as of June 30, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price for equity interests in the WSL/SLJ Acquisition
|
|
$
|
81,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing costs
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
84,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt assumed
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
158,075
|
|
Other liabilities (net of amounts excluded per purchase and sale
agreement)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred and refundable entrance fees assumed
|
|
$
|
15,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other liabilities assumed
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price including transaction costs and assumed
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
258,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The allocation of the purchase price to the assets to be
acquired as a result of the WSL/SLJ Acquisition is as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price including transaction costs and assumed
liabilities
|
|
$
|
258,735
|
|
Purchase price allocated to:
|
|
|
|
|
Operating assets
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred loan costs*
|
|
$
|
1,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating assets
|
|
$
|
1,580
|
|
Net real estate assets
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
30,710
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
$
|
218,117
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
$
|
8,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net real estate assets
|
|
$
|
257,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price allocation
|
|
$
|
258,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Reflects an increase of approximately $1.6 million in
deferred loan costs for the estimated cost of assuming the
indebtedness in the WSL/SLJ Acquisition.
|
F-14
Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and subsidiaries
In accordance with the purchase and sale agreement for the
WSL/SLJ Acquisition, certain current assets and liabilities
included on the historical WSL IV and SL Jupiter balance sheets
will not be acquired by the Company. The following is a summary
of the purchase price allocation adjustments, including the
effect of these excluded assets and liabilities for the WSL/SLJ
Acquisition (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
allocation
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net real estate assets
|
|
$
|
139,311
|
|
|
$
|
257,155
|
|
|
$
|
117,844
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
16,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,514
|
)
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
1,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,937
|
)
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
2,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,493
|
)
|
Due from affiliates
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(254
|
)
|
Other assets (net)
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
Deferred loan costs*
|
|
$
|
1,681
|
|
|
$
|
1,580
|
|
|
$
|
(101
|
)
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (including current portion)
|
|
$
|
158,075
|
|
|
$
|
158,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred and refundable entrance fees
|
|
|
15,989
|
|
|
|
15,735
|
|
|
|
(254
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(852
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
Retained earnings (deficit)
|
|
$
|
(12,479
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,479
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Reflects an increase of approximately $1.6 million in
deferred loan costs for the estimated cost of assuming the
indebtedness in the WSL/SLJ Acquisition and the elimination of
the previously deferred loan costs (net) with an unamortized
balance of $1.69 million as of June 30, 2010.
|
Approximately $84.9 million of the net proceeds of the
Offerings will be used in connection with the WSL/SLJ
Acquisition, representing approximately $81.9 million in
acquisition costs and approximately $3.0 million in
transaction costs.
The pro forma adjustments also reflect the reimbursement of
approximately $0.5 million, as of June 30, 2010, to
the Companys sole stockholder, who paid the initial
earnest money deposits on the Companys behalf.
(d) Represents the effects of the Offerings net of
the repurchase of 1,000 shares issued to the sole
stockholder at the formation of the Company. In the Common Stock
Offering, the Company intends to issue 8,750,000 shares of
common stock at an assumed initial public offering price of
$18.50 per share, which is the midpoint of the initial public
offering price range shown on the cover of this prospectus, for
approximately $161.9 million of gross offering proceeds
and, in the Concurrent Private Placement, the Company intends to
issue 324,324 shares of common stock at an assumed purchase
price of $18.50 per share for $6.0 million of gross private
placement proceeds. In connection with the Common Stock
Offering, the Company expects to incur approximately
$8.1 million in underwriting discounts and commissions,
$1.7 million in accounting and legal fees and
$0.9 million in other offering costs, or $10.7 million
in the aggregate. The pro forma adjustments also reflect the
reimbursement of approximately $0.7 million as of
June 30, 2010 to the Companys sole stockholder, who
paid that amount of costs related the offering on the
Companys behalf. Also represents the grant of an aggregate
of 25,000 restricted shares of the Companys common stock
to the Companys director nominees, all of which vest one
year after the date of grant. The compensation expense
associated with these stock grants is $0.2 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2010.
The pro forma adjustment to additional
paid-in-capital
reflects the impact of the Offerings and the IPO Warrants. The
adjustment represents an allocation of the proceeds of the
Offerings above the par value of the Companys common stock
and the fair value of the IPO Warrants. The Company has
determined that the IPO Warrants are appropriately reflected as
permanent equity based on the terms and characteristics of the
IPO Warrants, pursuant to the IPO Warrant agreement, and as such
the Company has estimated the fair value of the IPO Warrants,
based on the lattice valuation methodology, to be
F-15
Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and subsidiaries
equal to approximately $0.7 million. The key assumptions
used in the Companys determination of fair value included,
but were not limited to, estimated stock price volatility,
dividend yield, and the discount factor applicable to the
present value of the estimated stock price changes over the
exercise period of the IPO Warrants. In addition, the Company
estimated the number of IPO Warrants issued at the end of the
30-day
contingency period based upon an estimate of possible trading
volume in the Companys common stock during such
30-day
contingency period. The Companys estimate of possible
trading volume in the Companys common stock during such
30-day
contingency period was based primarily on the trading volume of
the common stock of other property REITs that have completed
initial public offerings in the last two years during the first
30 days after completion of their initial public offerings.
The Company estimates that a 5% change in the estimated number
of IPO Warrants issued would cause the estimated fair value of
the IPO Warrants to differ by approximately $0.1 million.
The Company estimates that a 1% decrease in the estimated volume
weighted average price of the Companys common stock during
the
30-day
contingency period would cause the estimated fair value of the
IPO Warrants to increase by approximately $0.2 million. The
Company estimates that a 5% change in the estimated price
volatility assumption used in the lattice valuation model would
cause the estimated fair value of the IPO Warrants to change by
approximately $0.3 million.
F-16
Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and subsidiaries
Unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated statement of operations
For the six
months ended June 30, 2010
(in thousands except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering,
Private
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Placement, IPO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
|
|
|
Acquisition of
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Warrants and
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Company
(1)
|
|
|
WSL
IV
(2)
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Equity
Grants
|
|
|
as
Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,203
|
|
|
$
|
1,366
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,569
|
|
Net residence services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,253
|
|
|
$
|
1,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,131
|
(4)
|
|
|
231
|
(4)
|
|
|
1,362
|
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
707
|
|
|
|
(707
|
)
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate taxes and insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
707
|
|
|
|
(529
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative and office
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
(186
|
)
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property acquisition costs
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,752
|
|
|
|
(1,752
|
)
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,321
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property operating expenses
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
$
|
2,645
|
|
|
$
|
2,443
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
$
|
5,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income
|
|
|
(477
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,608
|
|
|
$
|
(1,077
|
)
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and loan cost amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,690
|
)
|
|
$
|
(390
|
)
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,119
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(477
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,918
|
|
|
$
|
(1,506
|
)
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
$
|
704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(477
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
Weighted average shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,099,324
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated statement of operations.
F-17
Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and subsidiaries
Unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated statement of operations
For the year
ended December 31, 2009
(in thousands except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering,
Private
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Placement, IPO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
|
|
|
Acquisition of
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Warrants and
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Company
(1)
|
|
|
WSL
IV
(2)
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Equity
Grants
|
|
|
as
Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,350
|
|
|
$
|
2,790
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,140
|
|
Net residence services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,667
|
|
|
$
|
2,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,213
|
(4)
|
|
|
463
|
(4)
|
|
|
2,676
|
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,370
|
|
|
|
(1,370
|
)
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate taxes and insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,370
|
|
|
|
(1,015
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative and office
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
(242
|
)
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
345
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property acquisition costs
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,476
|
|
|
|
(3,476
|
)
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,643
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property operating expenses
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
$
|
5,088
|
|
|
$
|
5,038
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
$
|
11,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income
|
|
|
(477
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,579
|
|
|
$
|
(2,248
|
)
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and loan cost amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,965
|
)
|
|
$
|
(77
|
)
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4,994
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(952
|
)
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(477
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,614
|
|
|
$
|
(3,277
|
)
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(477
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
Weighted average shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,099,324
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated statement of operations.
F-18
Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statements of
operations
Six months ended
June 30, 2010 and year ended December 31, 2009
(1) The Company was incorporated in Maryland on
April 7, 2010. For purposes of the unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and the year ended
December 31, 2009, reflects the historical audited
consolidated statement of operations for the period from
inception (April 17, 2010) to June 30, 2010.
(2) For purposes of the Companys pro forma
presentation, the operating results, revenues and expenses of
the Company and WSL IV, the owner of five of the six facilities
under contract, have been included.
(3) Reflects the adjustment necessary to present the
Companys expected rental revenue received, on a straight
line basis, in connection with the Senior Lifestyle Leases. The
new Senior Lifestyle Leases have a term that expires on
January 31, 2012. The existing Senior Lifestyle Leases have
a term that expires on June 18, 2013. The Senior Lifestyle
Leases provide, on an aggregate basis, for monthly rent in 2010,
2011 and 2012 based on annual rent amounts of approximately
$16.3 million in 2010, $18.5 million in 2011 and
$20.7 million in 2012, respectively. Based on the estimated
potential total rent during the terms of the Senior Lifestyle
Leases, totalling approximately $25.6 million, the Company
has reflected a pro forma adjustment of approximately
$1.4 million and approximately $2.8 million to present
pro forma straight line rent of approximately $8.6 million
and approximately $17.1 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009,
respectively.
(4) Represents the costs incurred by the Company
attributable to its corporate infrastructure and overhead,
including the salaries and benefits of the employees in place,
compensation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2010
and year ended December 31, 2009 of approximately
$0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively, relating
to the restricted common stock grants, insurance costs
(including directors and officers insurance), and fees
associated with operating as a public company (including
accounting, auditing and other compliance costs), as if these
expenses had been incurred from January 1, 2009 through the
end of the period presented.
(5) Represents the elimination of approximately
$0.7 million and approximately $1.4 million in
property taxes reflected as incurred by WSL IV for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and the year ended
December 31, 2009, respectively, but for which the Company
will not be responsible pursuant to the Senior Lifestyle Leases.
Under the terms of the Senior Lifestyle Leases, the tenants will
bear the sole responsibility and obligation to pay the property
taxes for the facilities.
(6) Represents a reduction of approximately
$0.2 million and approximately $0.2 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 and the year ended
December 31, 2009, respectively, for certain general and
administrative services including costs affiliated with the
office facilities and administrative costs that were
historically paid by WSL IV and that the Company is not assuming
in connection with the WSL/SLJ Acquisition.
(7) Reflects loan cost amortization expense of
approximately $0.04 million and $0.08 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 and the year ended
December 31, 2009, respectively, as a result of the
Companys assumption of indebtedness in connection with the
WSL/SLJ Acquisition, pertaining to approximately
$1.6 million in lender fees incurred net of the reversal of
deferred loan cost amortization recognized by WSL IV. The
loan costs that will be incurred by the Company will be
amortized over the remaining three year term of the assumed
mortgage indebtedness. Interest expense of approximately
$0.4 million and $1.0 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009,
respectively, relating to the long-term debt affiliated with SL
Jupiter that the Company will
F-19
Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and subsidiaries
assume in connection with the WSL/SLJ Acquisition has been
included to present the full balance of interest expense
expected to be incurred by the Company.
(8) Adjustments for the estimated pro forma
depreciation and amortization of real estate assets relating to
the WSL/SLJ Acquisition are based on the adjusted basis of the
WSL IV and SL Jupiter assets and liabilities. The Company has
estimated these amounts based on the historical financial
statements of both WSL IV and SL Jupiter and the Companys
estimates of fair value. These allocations are subject to change
based on valuation studies obtained from third-party consultants
and the final purchase price allocation.
The following table summarizes the estimated adjustments to
depreciation and amortization of real estate assets relating to
the WSL/SLJ Acquisition (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Historical net book value of WSL IV and SL Jupiter properties
|
|
$
|
139,311
|
|
Allocation of purchase price to health care properties
|
|
|
117,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated assigned value to WSL IV and SL Jupiter properties
after application of purchase accounting
|
|
$
|
257,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated allocation between land, buildings and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
30,710
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
218,117
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
8,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total health care properties
|
|
$
|
257,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six
months ended
|
|
|
For the year
ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated depreciation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings (40 years)
|
|
$
|
2,726
|
|
|
$
|
5,453
|
|
Furniture and equipment (7 years)
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated depreciation expense
|
|
$
|
3,321
|
|
|
$
|
6,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9) Pro forma earnings per share for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 and year ended December 31, 2009
was calculated based upon the number of shares of common stock
issued and outstanding as a result of the Offerings and the
shares of common stock issued in connection with the stock
awards being made pursuant to the Plan to the Companys
executive officers and director nominees. Pro forma earnings per
share were calculated based upon the weighted average number of
shares of common stock outstanding, adjusted as if the shares
were outstanding on January 1, 2009 which equalled the
total shares issued and outstanding as a result of the
aforementioned transactions and the vested stock grants
including the first year of vesting for the restricted common
stock grants.
F-20
WSL
Holdings IV, LLC
Independent
auditors report
The Members
WSL Holdings IV, LLC:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of
financial position of WSL Holdings IV, LLC (a Delaware limited
liability company) and subsidiaries (collectively, the Company)
as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, members deficit,
and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period
ended December 31, 2009. These consolidated financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys managing
member. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit also
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position of the Company as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the
three year period ended December 31, 2009 in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ KPMG LLP
April 9, 2010
Chicago, Illinois
F-21
WSL
Holdings IV, LLC
Consolidated
statements of financial position
June 30,
2010 (unaudited), December 31, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
June 30:
|
|
|
As of
December 31:
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
15,814,877
|
|
|
$
|
11,646,499
|
|
|
$
|
4,182,150
|
|
Lender required and other escrow deposits
|
|
|
1,463,272
|
|
|
|
1,386,052
|
|
|
|
1,325,974
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
787,435
|
|
|
|
451,236
|
|
|
|
2,232,763
|
|
Notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,000
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
166,494
|
|
|
|
363,136
|
|
|
|
565,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,232,078
|
|
|
|
13,846,923
|
|
|
|
8,370,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
11,780,344
|
|
|
|
11,780,344
|
|
|
|
11,780,344
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
117,025,503
|
|
|
|
117,006,711
|
|
|
|
116,874,203
|
|
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment
|
|
|
3,450,399
|
|
|
|
3,436,718
|
|
|
|
3,080,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,256,246
|
|
|
|
132,223,773
|
|
|
|
131,735,156
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(16,786,741
|
)
|
|
|
(15,034,978
|
)
|
|
|
(11,558,731
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment properties
|
|
|
115,469,505
|
|
|
|
117,188,795
|
|
|
|
120,176,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Straight-line rent receivable
|
|
|
1,650,159
|
|
|
|
1,560,704
|
|
|
|
787,224
|
|
Deferred expenses, net
|
|
|
1,412,689
|
|
|
|
1,507,065
|
|
|
|
1,944,304
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
33,094
|
|
|
|
54,022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
136,764,722
|
|
|
$
|
134,136,581
|
|
|
$
|
131,332,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and members (deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
322,608
|
|
|
$
|
674,136
|
|
|
$
|
435,381
|
|
Resident deposits
|
|
|
15,286,805
|
|
|
|
15,224,633
|
|
|
|
15,272,974
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
125,050,000
|
|
|
|
125,050,000
|
|
|
|
125,050,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
140,659,413
|
|
|
|
140,948,769
|
|
|
|
140,758,355
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members (deficit)
|
|
|
(3,894,691
|
)
|
|
|
(6,812,188
|
)
|
|
|
(9,425,435
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and members (deficit)
|
|
$
|
136,764,722
|
|
|
$
|
134,136,581
|
|
|
$
|
131,332,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-22
WSL
Holdings IV, LLC
Consolidated
statements of operations
Six month periods
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited) and the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended
June 30:
|
|
|
Years ended
December 31:
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income
|
|
$
|
7,203,478
|
|
|
$
|
7,186,681
|
|
|
$
|
14,349,735
|
|
|
$
|
13,678,080
|
|
|
$
|
11,673,932
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
49,451
|
|
|
|
166,486
|
|
|
|
316,698
|
|
|
|
214,947
|
|
|
|
381,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,252,929
|
|
|
|
7,353,167
|
|
|
|
14,666,433
|
|
|
|
13,893,027
|
|
|
|
12,055,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
186,079
|
|
|
|
143,807
|
|
|
|
241,856
|
|
|
|
1,010,361
|
|
|
|
572,532
|
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
|
707,248
|
|
|
|
691,088
|
|
|
|
1,369,622
|
|
|
|
1,358,971
|
|
|
|
1,379,246
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
1,690,342
|
|
|
|
2,250,692
|
|
|
|
3,965,461
|
|
|
|
5,899,432
|
|
|
|
6,231,184
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1,751,763
|
|
|
|
1,732,369
|
|
|
|
3,476,247
|
|
|
|
3,378,105
|
|
|
|
3,340,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,335,432
|
|
|
|
4,817,956
|
|
|
|
9,053,186
|
|
|
|
11,646,869
|
|
|
|
11,523,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income
|
|
|
2,917,497
|
|
|
|
2,535,211
|
|
|
|
5,613,247
|
|
|
|
2,246,158
|
|
|
|
532,513
|
|
Gain on debt extinguishment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,066,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
2,917,497
|
|
|
$
|
2,535,211
|
|
|
$
|
5,613,247
|
|
|
$
|
7,312,973
|
|
|
$
|
532,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-23
WSL
Holdings IV, LLC
Consolidated
statements of members equity (deficit)
Six months ended
June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walton SL
|
|
|
Lifestyle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investors IV
|
|
|
Investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LLC
|
|
|
2004 LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90%
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Members equity, December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
34,406,171
|
|
|
$
|
3,822,908
|
|
|
$
|
38,229,079
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
(1,800,000
|
)
|
|
|
(200,000
|
)
|
|
|
(2,000,000
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
479,262
|
|
|
|
53,251
|
|
|
|
532,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members equity, December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
33,085,433
|
|
|
$
|
3,676,159
|
|
|
$
|
36,761,592
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
(48,150,000
|
)
|
|
|
(5,350,000
|
)
|
|
|
(53,500,000
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
6,581,676
|
|
|
|
731,297
|
|
|
|
7,312,973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members deficit, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
(8,482,891
|
)
|
|
|
(942,544
|
)
|
|
|
(9,425,435
|
)
|
Distributions
|
|
|
(2,700,000
|
)
|
|
|
(300,000
|
)
|
|
|
(3,000,000
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
5,051,922
|
|
|
|
561,325
|
|
|
|
5,613,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members deficit, December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
(6,130,969
|
)
|
|
$
|
(681,219
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,812,188
|
)
|
Net income (unaudited)
|
|
|
2,625,747
|
|
|
|
291,750
|
|
|
|
2,917,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members deficit, June 30, 2010 (unaudited)
|
|
$
|
(3,505,222
|
)
|
|
$
|
(389,469
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,894,691
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-24
WSL
Holdings IV, LLC
Consolidated
statements of cash flows
Six month periods
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
and years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months
ended
|
|
|
Years ended
|
|
|
|
June 30:
|
|
|
December 31:
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
2,917,497
|
|
|
$
|
2,535,211
|
|
|
$
|
5,613,247
|
|
|
$
|
7,312,973
|
|
|
$
|
532,513
|
|
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair market value of the interest rate cap
|
|
|
32,803
|
|
|
|
(38,491
|
)
|
|
|
20,928
|
|
|
|
396,867
|
|
|
|
32,925
|
|
Amortization of deferred mortgage costs
|
|
|
224,206
|
|
|
|
225,682
|
|
|
|
449,888
|
|
|
|
410,719
|
|
|
|
146,274
|
|
Amortization of loan premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(858,792
|
)
|
|
|
(83,132
|
)
|
Gain on debt extinguishment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,066,815
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1,751,763
|
|
|
|
1,732,369
|
|
|
|
3,476,247
|
|
|
|
3,378,105
|
|
|
|
3,340,407
|
|
Straight-line rent receivable
|
|
|
(89,455
|
)
|
|
|
(386,740
|
)
|
|
|
(773,480
|
)
|
|
|
(576,951
|
)
|
|
|
721,709
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lender required and other escrow deposits
|
|
|
129,193
|
|
|
|
71,593
|
|
|
|
(68,799
|
)
|
|
|
451,449
|
|
|
|
441,911
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(336,199
|
)
|
|
|
(178,268
|
)
|
|
|
1,781,527
|
|
|
|
(774,113
|
)
|
|
|
(531,177
|
)
|
Notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65,000
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
196,642
|
|
|
|
411,758
|
|
|
|
201,922
|
|
|
|
(415,739
|
)
|
|
|
(6,741
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(312,694
|
)
|
|
|
53,393
|
|
|
|
199,921
|
|
|
|
(318,817
|
)
|
|
|
(316,704
|
)
|
Resident deposits
|
|
|
62,172
|
|
|
|
(3,180
|
)
|
|
|
(48,341
|
)
|
|
|
54,104
|
|
|
|
197,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
4,575,928
|
|
|
|
4,423,327
|
|
|
|
10,918,060
|
|
|
|
3,992,990
|
|
|
|
4,410,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to investment properties, net of related payables
|
|
|
(71,307
|
)
|
|
|
(242,040
|
)
|
|
|
(449,783
|
)
|
|
|
(735,928
|
)
|
|
|
(112,500
|
)
|
Lender required and other escrow deposits
|
|
|
(138,672
|
)
|
|
|
(41,377
|
)
|
|
|
(33,342
|
)
|
|
|
479,505
|
|
|
|
(172,045
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(209,979
|
)
|
|
|
(283,417
|
)
|
|
|
(483,125
|
)
|
|
|
(256,423
|
)
|
|
|
(284,545
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
(3,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
(53,500,000
|
)
|
|
|
(2,000,000
|
)
|
Purchase of interest rate cap instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(450,889
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,050,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,241,401
|
)
|
|
|
(724,910
|
)
|
Payment of deferred loan costs
|
|
|
(129,830
|
)
|
|
|
(12,649
|
)
|
|
|
(12,649
|
)
|
|
|
(2,163,425
|
)
|
|
|
(94,839
|
)
|
Lender required and other escrow deposits
|
|
|
(67,741
|
)
|
|
|
127,345
|
|
|
|
42,063
|
|
|
|
305,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(197,571
|
)
|
|
|
(2,885,304
|
)
|
|
|
(2,970,586
|
)
|
|
|
(2,999,869
|
)
|
|
|
(2,819,749
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4,168,378
|
|
|
|
1,254,606
|
|
|
|
7,464,349
|
|
|
|
736,698
|
|
|
|
1,305,735
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
11,646,499
|
|
|
|
4,182,150
|
|
|
|
4,182,150
|
|
|
|
3,445,452
|
|
|
|
2,139,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
$
|
15,814,877
|
|
|
$
|
5,436,756
|
|
|
$
|
11,646,499
|
|
|
$
|
4,182,150
|
|
|
$
|
3,445,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for interest
|
|
$
|
1,274,898
|
|
|
$
|
1,625,007
|
|
|
$
|
3,309,235
|
|
|
$
|
6,007,320
|
|
|
$
|
6,168,042
|
|
Noncash additions to investment properties were approximately $0
as of June 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited), respectively and
$39,000, $38,000, and $532,000 as of December 31, 2009,
2008, and 2007, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-25
WSL
Holdings IV, LLC
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
NOTE
1. Organization and nature of activities
WSL Holdings IV, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(WSL Holdings), was formed on January 18, 2005
by Walton SL Investors IV, LLC, managing member (Walton
SL), a wholly owned subsidiary of Walton Acquisition REOC
Holdings IV, LLC (REOC), Senior Lifestyle Investors
2004, LLC (SLI), and Senior Lifestyle Management,
LLC (SLM) to form a number of wholly owned entities,
which have acquired retirement community properties (the
Communities) more fully described in note 3. On
September 29, 2005, SLM transferred its interest in WSL
Holdings to an affiliated party, Senior Lifestyle CI, LLC
(SLCI).
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of WSL Holdings and its wholly owned subsidiaries WSL
Chancellors Village Investors IV, LLC, WSL Baywinde
Investors IV, LLC, WSL Castle Pointe Investors IV, LLC, WSL Sage
Harbor Investors IV, LLC, WSL Walden Investors IV, LLC, WSL Lake
Barrington Investors IV, LLC, and WSL Bella Terra Investors IV,
LLC (collectively, WSL IV). All intercompany
transactions and balances among these entities have been
eliminated in consolidation.
|
|
NOTE
2.
|
SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
prepared on a historical cost basis in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(U.S. GAAP).
Unaudited Interim
Information
The financial statements as of June 30, 2010 and for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are unaudited. In
the opinion of management, such financial statements reflect all
adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the respective
interim periods. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring
nature.
Cash and cash
equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid investments,
including treasury money market funds, which invest principally
in U.S. Treasury notes and bills or repurchase agreements
collateralized by those securities. Cash and cash equivalent
balances with any one institution may be or may have been in
excess of federally insured limits then in place. WSL IV
has not experienced any losses in such accounts to date.
Lender required
and other escrow deposits
Lender required and other escrow deposits consist of deposits
for real estate taxes, capital improvements, replacement costs,
discount fees (as defined), and future interest rate cap
purchases.
Buildings and
improvements
Significant betterments and improvements are capitalized and
depreciated over the applicable useful lives as they are placed
in service. Maintenance and repair expenses are charged to
operations as incurred.
Impairment of
long-lived assets
WSL IV periodically reviews the carrying value of the
Communities for impairment if circumstances exist indicating the
carrying value of the investment in the Communities may not be
recoverable. Impairment indicators include, but are not limited
to, significant decreases in property net operating
F-26
WSL
Holdings IV, LLC
income and occupancy percentages. If events or circumstances
support the possibility of impairment, WSL IV prepares a
projection of the undiscounted future cash flows of the
Communities to determine if the investment is recoverable. If
impairment is indicated, an adjustment will be made to the
carrying value of the Communities to reduce the carrying value
to its current fair value. If an asset is held for sale, it is
measured at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less
selling costs. WSL IV does not believe that there are any events
or circumstances indicating impairment of its investment in the
Communities at December 31, 2009 and 2008.
Acquisitions
The acquisitions of the Communities were accounted for utilizing
the purchase method, and accordingly, the results of operations
are included in WSL IVs accompanying consolidated
statements of operations from the respective date of
acquisition. WSL IV used estimates of future cash flows and
other valuation techniques to allocate the purchase price of
acquired Communities among land, buildings and improvements, and
furniture, fixtures, and equipment. WSL IV assumed above-market
debt at acquisition for three of the Communities and recorded a
related premium in the accompanying consolidated statements of
financial position of $6,207,365 at acquisition. In connection
with payoff of the related debt during 2008 (Note 5), the
aggregate unamortized loan premium was written off to gain on
debt extinguishment. As the leases were executed concurrently
with the acquisition of the Communities, there are no other
identifiable intangibles such as acquired in-place lease or
acquired above and below market lease intangibles.
Deferred
expenses
Deferred expenses are comprised of deferred mortgage costs,
which are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lives of
the related debt, which approximates the effective interest
method. Amortization of deferred mortgage costs was $449,888,
$410,719 and $146,274 for the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Derivatives and
hedging instruments
WSL IV accounts for derivatives in accordance with applicable
accounting literature, which requires that all derivatives be
recognized as either an asset or a liability in the combined
consolidated statements of financial position and be measured at
fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of
derivative instruments is dependent upon whether the applicable
instrument has been formally designated and derivative
instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging
instruments, that instrument must then be designated, based upon
the exposure being hedged, as a fair value, cash flow hedge, or
a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. As of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, WSL IVs derivatives
that are measured at fair value were derived using primarily
level 2 inputs.
Asset retirement
obligations
WSL IV evaluated any potential asset retirement obligations,
including those related to disposal of asbestos-containing
materials and environmental remediation obligations. WSL IV
recognizes the fair value of such obligations in the period
incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be
determined.
Based on this review, WSL IV did not identify any significant
asset retirement obligations or environmental remediation
obligations related to the Communities.
Fair value of
financial instruments
For fair value of financial instruments, WSL IV estimates fair
value based on the discounting of future cash flows using
current market information. The carrying amount of WSL IVs
financial instruments,
F-27
WSL
Holdings IV, LLC
principally accounts receivable, escrow deposits, accounts
payable and accrued expenses, derivative instruments, and
working capital items, approximate their fair value at
December 31, 2009 and 2008. The approximate aggregate fair
value of notes payable was $117,011,000 and $118,268,000 as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, as compared to
the approximate book value of $125,050,000 and $125,050,000 as
of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Fair value
measurements
In some instances, certain of WSL IVs assets and
liabilities are required to be measured or disclosed at fair
value according to a fair value hierarchy pursuant to relevant
accounting literature. This hierarchy ranks the quality and
reliability of the inputs used to determine fair values, which
are then classified and disclosed in one of three categories.
The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:
|
|
Ø
|
Level 1quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities.
|
|
Ø
|
Level 2quoted prices in active markets for similar
assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not
active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable.
|
|
Ø
|
Level 3model-derived valuations with unobservable
inputs that are supported by little or no market activity.
|
Assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level
of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
WSL IVs assessment of the significance of a
particular input to the fair value measurement requires
judgment, and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and
liabilities and their classifications within the fair value
hierarchy levels.
Revenue
recognition
Although certain leases of the Communities provide for tenant
occupancy during periods for which no rent is due
and/or
increases in the minimum lease payments over the terms of the
leases, rental income is accrued for the full period of
occupancy on a straight-line basis. Related adjustments
increased rental income by $773,480 and $576,951 in 2009 and
2008, respectively and decreased rental income by $721,709 in
2007. Percentage rent is accrued when tenants specified
sales targets have been met. Interest income is accrued as
earned. Expense recoveries are recognized as revenue in the
period the costs are incurred. Lease termination fees are
generally recognized when fees are determinable, tenant move-out
has occurred, and collectibility is reasonably assured.
Resident deposits received from residents of Chancellors
Village are generally fully refundable upon a successor
residents full payment of the resident fee with respect to
the residential unit occupied by the terminating resident.
During a residents occupancy, the use of the resident
deposit to fund operations by WSL IV is generally
unrestricted. As WSL IV bears the market risk relative to
any shortfall in the replacement resident deposit, WSL IV
does not recognize revenue associated with these resident
deposits. Certain resident deposits received after February 2006
are only partially refundable based upon a successor
residents full payment of the resident fee with respect to
the residential unit occupied by the terminating resident. As it
relates to these deposits, the length of residency at
Chancellors Village determines the portion of the entrance
fee that is refundable (95% if prior to first anniversary, 90%
if first anniversary reached, 85% if second anniversary reached,
and 80% if third anniversary reached). In January 2007,
WSL IV further decreased the refundable portion of entrance
fees at each anniversary date for incoming residents (90% if
prior to first anniversary, 85% if first anniversary reached,
80% if second anniversary reached, and 75% if third anniversary
reached). WSL IV recognizes the nonrefundable portion of
the entrance fee as income using the straight-line method over
five years. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the resident
deposits liability aggregated to approximately
$15.2 million and $15.3 million, respectively. For the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, resident fee
revenue was $309,017, $93,581 and $274,220, respectively, and is
included in interest and other income in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations.
F-28
WSL
Holdings IV, LLC
Income
taxes
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
guidance on accounting for uncertain tax positions. The guidance
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes by
creating a framework for how companies should recognize,
measure, present, and disclose in their financial statements
uncertain tax positions that they have taken or expect to take
in a tax return. The guidance is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008 and was adopted by
WSL IV beginning January 1, 2009. WSL IV had no
unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2009.
WSL IV expects no significant increases or decreases in
unrecognized tax benefits due to changes in tax positions within
one year of December 31, 2009. WSL IV has no
significant interest or penalties relating to income taxes
recognized in the consolidated financial statements.
No provision for Federal and state income taxes has been made in
the accompanying consolidated financial statements, as the
liability for such taxes is primarily that of the Members rather
than WSL IV. In certain instances WSL IV may be
subject to certain state and local taxes which are not material
to the consolidated financial statements.
Depreciation
Depreciation of the Communities is computed using the
straight-line method over 7 (personal property) to 39 (real
property) years as assets are placed in service.
Recently Issued
Accounting Standards
On July 1, 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued the FASB Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC or the Codification) that
establishes the exclusive authoritative reference for
U.S. GAAP for use in financial statements. The Codification
references supersede all existing accounting and reporting
standard references. This guidance is effective for interim
periods ending after September 15, 2009. WSL IV
adopted the guidance as of July 1, 2009, and it did not
have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements
and notes to the consolidated financial statements, aside from
changing the nomenclature used to reference accounting
literature.
Risks and
uncertainties
In the normal course of business, WSL IV encounters
economic risk, including interest rate risk, credit risk, and
market risk. Interest rate risk is the result of movements in
the underlying variable component of the mortgage financing
rates. Credit risk is the risk of default on WSL IVs
real estate investments that results from an underlying
tenants inability or unwillingness to make contractually
required payments. Market risk reflects changes in the valuation
of real estate investments held by WSL IV.
The recent market volatility will likely make the valuations of
the Communities more difficult. There may be significant
uncertainty in the valuations, or in the stability of the
values, that could result in substantial decreases in the values
of the Communities. As a result, WSL IV may not be able to
recover the carrying values of the Communities which may require
WSL IV to record provisions for impairment.
Use of
estimates
In preparing the consolidated financial statements in conformity
with U.S. GAAP, management of WSL IV makes estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the consolidated financial statements, as well as
the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
F-29
WSL
Holdings IV, LLC
Reclassifications
Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform to
the current year presentation, which has not changed the results
of prior year.
|
|
NOTE
3.
|
INVESTMENT
PROPERTIES
|
WSL IV owns the following Communities at December 31, 2009
and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units/
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
purchase
|
|
Venture,
community name, and location
|
|
Operator
|
|
acres
|
|
|
date
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
|
|
WSL Chancellors Village Investors IV, LLC,
Chancellors Village, Fredericksburg, VA
|
|
SL Chancellors
Village, LLC
|
|
|
187 units
|
|
|
|
11/05
|
|
|
$
|
31,730,000
|
(2)
|
WSL Baywinde Investors IV, LLC,
Penfield, NY
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
22 acres
|
|
|
|
10/05
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
WSL Castle Pointe Investors IV, LLC,
Castle Pointe, Penfield, NY
|
|
SL Castle
Pointe, LLC
|
|
|
134 units
|
|
|
|
10/05
|
|
|
|
18,343,000
|
|
WSL Sage Harbor Investors IV, LLC,
Sage Harbor, Penfield, NY
|
|
SL Sage Harbor,
LLC
|
|
|
78 units
|
|
|
|
10/05
|
|
|
|
9,877,000
|
|
WSL Walden Investors IV, LLC,
Walden Place, Cortland, NY
|
|
SL Walden, LLC
|
|
|
80 units
|
|
|
|
10/05
|
|
|
|
6,600,000
|
|
WSL Lake Barrington Investors IV, LLC,
Lake Barrington, Lake Barrington, IL
|
|
SL Barrington,
LLC
|
|
|
193 units
|
|
|
|
3/05
|
|
|
|
31,000,000
|
(1)
|
WSL Bella Terra Investors IV, LLC,
Bella Terra, Jackson, NJ
|
|
SL Bella Terra,
LLC
|
|
|
215 units
|
|
|
|
3/05
|
|
|
|
25,000,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The purchase prices of Lake Barrington and Bella Terra
included deferred payments totaling $6,000,000 at acquisition,
all of which was subsequently paid.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The purchase price of Chancellors Village included the
assumption of a liability for resident deposits of approximately
$14,530,000 at acquisition.
|
In conjunction with the execution of the leases as described in
Note 4, the facility operators (the Operators)
entered into management agreements with SLM for each of the
Communities for a period of one year with renewals for
successive one-month periods unless terminated in accordance
with the management agreements. Management fees are paid to SLM
by the Operators based on the terms of the management
agreements, and such fees are not recorded by WSL IV. The
management agreements require a base management fee in years one
and two and a market rate fee (as defined in the respective
management agreements) thereafter. Pursuant to the terms of the
management agreements, SLM provides the operator of the
Communities with various services.
F-30
WSL
Holdings IV, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Venture
|
|
Operator
|
|
Term
|
|
Rent
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
WSL Chancellors Village Investors IV, LLC
|
|
SL Chancellors Village, LLC
|
|
5 years
|
|
Monthly fixed rent increases annually.
|
|
Tenant responsible for operating expenses and real estate taxes.
|
WSL Castle Pointe Investors IV, LLC
|
|
SL Castle Pointe, LLC
|
|
5 years
|
|
Monthly fixed rent plus percentage rent based on 10% of Gross
Revenues
(1)
in excess of the Percentage Rent
Hurdle
(2)
.
Fixed rent increases annually.
|
|
Tenant responsible for operating expenses and real estate taxes.
|
WSL Sage Harbor Investors IV, LLC
|
|
SL Sage Harbor, LLC
|
|
5 years
|
|
Monthly fixed rent plus percentage rent based on 10% of Gross
Revenues
(1)
in excess of the Percentage Rent
Hurdle
(2)
.
Fixed rent increases annually.
|
|
Tenant responsible for operating expenses and real estate taxes.
|
WSL Walden Investors IV, LLC
|
|
SL Walden, LLC
|
|
5 years
|
|
Monthly fixed rent plus percentage rent based on 10% of Gross
Revenues
(1)
in excess of the Percentage Rent
Hurdle
(2)
.
Fixed rent increases annually.
|
|
Tenant responsible for operating expenses and real estate taxes.
|
WSL Lake Barrington Investors IV, LLC
|
|
SL Barrington, LLC
|
|
5 years
|
|
Monthly fixed rent plus percentage rent based on 10% of Gross
Revenues
(1)
in excess of the Percentage Rent
Hurdle
(2)
.
Fixed rent increases annually.
|
|
Tenant responsible for operating expenses and real estate taxes.
|
WSL Bella Terra Investors IV, LLC
|
|
SL Bella Terra, LLC
|
|
5 years
|
|
Monthly fixed rent plus percentage rent based on 10% of Gross
Revenues
(1)
in excess of the Percentage Rent
Hurdle
(2)
.
Fixed rent increases annually.
|
|
Tenant responsible for operating expenses and real estate taxes.
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Gross Revenuescollected gross revenue without
adjustment.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Percentage Rent Hurdlean annual gross revenue hurdle
defined in each lease.
|
WSL IV bills the Operators for reimbursement of certain costs
including real estate taxes as permitted pursuant to the leases.
Additionally, in certain instances, the Operator advances costs
for capital expenditures on behalf of WSL IV. As of
December 31, 2009 and 2008 approximately $308,219 and
$1,337,395, respectively, of such amounts are included in
accounts receivable and approximately $154,494 and $127,580,
respectively, of such amounts are included in accounts payable
in the accompanying consolidated statements of financial
position.
Additionally, the leases allow for loans from WSL IV and its
wholly owned subsidiaries to the Communities for operating cash
shortfalls. The leases call for amounts borrowed by the Operator
to be repaid plus interest at the prime rate. As of
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
the principal drawn on the promissory notes was $0 (unaudited),
$0, $65,000 and $65,000, respectively.
In connection with the debt refinancing in June 2008
(Note 5), WSL IV amended the leases with the Communities.
Under the amended leases, the terms were extended so as to
expire on June 18, 2013, and any options to extend the
leases were terminated.
F-31
WSL
Holdings IV, LLC
WSL IV has determined that the tenant leases are classified as
operating leases; therefore, rental income is recognized when
earned. The approximate minimum lease payments to be received in
the future under operating lease amounts are as follows as of
December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts
|
|
|
|
|
Years:
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
12,654,000
|
|
2011
|
|
|
13,160,000
|
|
2012
|
|
|
13,666,000
|
|
2013
|
|
|
6,568,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
46,048,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
Notes payable consisted of the following at June 30, 2010
(unaudited) and December 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
Payment
|
|
|
Initial
|
|
|
Extension
|
|
Entity
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Stated
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
terms
|
|
|
maturity
|
|
|
options
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WSL Chancellors Village Investors IV,
LLC
(6)
|
|
$
|
17,470,000
|
|
|
$
|
17,470,000
|
|
|
$
|
17,470,000
|
|
|
|
Variable
|
(2)
|
|
|
2.29
|
%
(3)
|
|
|
4.34
|
%
(4)
|
|
|
Interest only
|
(1)
|
|
|
6/1/2013
|
|
|
|
7 / 10 years
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WSL Castle Pointe Investors IV,
LLC
(6)
|
|
|
17,845,000
|
|
|
|
17,845,000
|
|
|
|
17,845,000
|
|
|
|
Variable
|
(2)
|
|
|
2.29
|
%
(3)
|
|
|
4.34
|
%
(4)
|
|
|
Interest only
|
(1)
|
|
|
6/1/2013
|
|
|
|
7 / 10 years
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WSL Sage Harbor Investors IV,
LLC
(6)
|
|
|
11,925,000
|
|
|
|
11,925,000
|
|
|
|
11,925,000
|
|
|
|
Variable
|
(2)
|
|
|
2.29
|
%
(3)
|
|
|
4.34
|
%
(4)
|
|
|
Interest only
|
(1)
|
|
|
6/1/2013
|
|
|
|
7 / 10 years
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WSL Walden Investors IV,
LLC
(6)
|
|
|
8,550,000
|
|
|
|
8,550,000
|
|
|
|
8,550,000
|
|
|
|
Variable
|
(2)
|
|
|
2.29
|
%
(3)
|
|
|
4.34
|
%
(4)
|
|
|
Interest only
|
(1)
|
|
|
6/1/2013
|
|
|
|
7 / 10 years
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lake Barrington Community,
LLC
(5)(6)
|
|
|
43,512,000
|
|
|
|
43,512,000
|
|
|
|
43,512,000
|
|
|
|
Variable
|
(2)
|
|
|
2.29
|
%
(3)
|
|
|
4.34
|
%
(4)
|
|
|
Interest only
|
(1)
|
|
|
6/1/2013
|
|
|
|
7 / 10 years
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bella Terra Community,
LLC
(5)(6)
|
|
|
25,748,000
|
|
|
|
25,748,000
|
|
|
|
25,748,000
|
|
|
|
Variable
|
(2)
|
|
|
2.29
|
%
(3)
|
|
|
4.34
|
%
(4)
|
|
|
Interest only
|
(1)
|
|
|
6/1/2013
|
|
|
|
7 / 10 years
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized loan premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
125,050,000
|
|
|
$
|
125,050,000
|
|
|
$
|
125,050,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Note payable is interest only until July 1, 2010 and
then changes to amortizing through maturity.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Interest rate, per the 2008 refinancing agreement, is
variable as defined per the terms of the note payable (based on
current
3-month
DMBS
rate plus 2.15% spread).
|
|
(3)
|
|
Interest rate equal to December 1, 2009 rollover
3-month
DMBS
rate (0.14%) plus spread (2.15%).
|
|
(4)
|
|
Interest rate equal to December 1, 2008 rollover
3-month
DMBS
rate (2.19%) plus spread (2.15%).
|
|
(5)
|
|
These entities are wholly owned subsidiaries of WSL Lake
Barrington Investors IV, LLC and WSL Bella Terra Investors IV,
LLC, respectively.
|
|
(6)
|
|
The notes payable related to each entity are
cross-collateralized.
|
|
(7)
|
|
WSL IV has a one-time option to convert the variable interest
rate to a fixed rate. If the conversion option is exercised, the
initial maturity date shall be extended, at WSL IVs
election, by either 7 or 10 years from the date the fixed
rate becomes effective.
|
F-33
WSL
Holdings IV, LLC
In connection with the acquisitions of Castle Pointe, Sage
Harbor, and Walden Place (the HUD Properties), notes
payable in the amount of $11,519,336, $6,095,216, and
$4,994,240, bearing interest at 7.75%, 8.40%, and 7.55%,
respectively, were assumed by WSL IV. As of the acquisition
dates of these Communities, based on interest rates for similar
loans as of that date, WSL IV recorded loan premiums of
$3,040,097, $2,045,831, and $1,121,437 for Castle Pointe, Sage
Harbor, and Walden Place, respectively. The loan premiums were
amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the terms of
the respective notes through the refinancing close date of
June 5, 2008 (see below), at which time the aggregate
unamortized loan premium was $5,866,397. The unamortized loan
premium was netted against prepayment penalties of $799,582, and
the resulting $5,066,815 was recognized as a gain on debt
extinguishment in the accompanying 2008 consolidated statements
of operations.
The purchases of the HUD Properties were financed through equity
contributions and mortgage loans with the United States
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
under the terms of Section 232 of the National Housing Act.
Agreements with HUD provided for the regulation and control of
the operations of the HUD Properties. Under the terms thereof,
the operator of the HUD Properties was regulated as to rent
charges and operating methods. WSL IV was also regulated by HUD,
which provided restrictions as to transactions with related
parties, transfer of title, and payments of principal and
interest on the debt, as well as established certain restricted
deposit accounts for real estate taxes, insurance, capital
improvements, and replacement reserves. In connection with the
June 2008 refinancing, the HUD notes payable were fully repaid.
WSL IV extended the original maturity dates of the loans secured
by Bella Terra and Lake Barrington from March 4, 2007 to
June 5, 2008, at which point the loans for all of the
Communities were refinanced.
On June 5, 2008, WSL IV obtained debt financing in the
amount of $125,050,000. Proceeds from the new financing were
used to pay off existing debt and remaining proceeds were
distributed to the members of WSL IV. The new debt consists of
six Fannie Mae Discount Mortgage-Backed Securities
(DMBS) notes which are cross-collateralized by the
Communities. The notes bear interest at the DMBS rate plus 2.15%
(2.29% and 4.34% at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively). Pursuant to lender requirements, the spread is
paid on a monthly basis and the DMBS rate is prepaid by WSL IV
at three month intervals. As of December 31, 2009, prepaid
interest relating to the January 2010 spread and the January and
February 2010 DMBS rate was $253,058, and is included in prepaid
expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of
financial position. As of December 31, 2008, prepaid
interest relating to January and February 2009 DMBS rate was
$459,397, and is included in prepaid expenses in the
accompanying consolidated statements of financial position.
Lender required and other escrow deposits aggregated $1,386,052
and $1,325,974 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
As a requirement of the June 2008 refinancing, WSL IV entered
into interest rate cap agreements (the Caps) for
each note payable, which fixed the maximum strike rate at 5.67%.
The Caps have a term of three years, and subsequent interest
rate caps with terms equal to the remaining terms of the notes
are required to be purchased on June 1, 2011. The notional
amount of each Cap is equal to the respective notes
principal amount, and the Caps were acquired at a total cost of
$450,889. The approximate fair value of the Caps at
December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $33,094 and $54,022,
respectively, and is included in other assets in the
accompanying consolidated statements of financial position. WSL
IV elected not to designate the Caps as hedges and, as such, the
decrease in the fair value of the Caps of $20,928 and $396,867
in 2009 and 2008, respectively, is reflected in general and
administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations.
F-34
WSL
Holdings IV, LLC
The aggregate maturities of WSL IVs notes payable at
December 31, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Years:
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
938,408
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,959,495
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2,036,090
|
|
2013
|
|
|
120,116,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
125,050,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE
6.
|
COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
|
WSL IV is or may be subject to a variety of claims or legal
actions arising in the ordinary course of business. The outcomes
of such claims are not expected to have a material adverse
effect on WSL IVs consolidated financial position or
results of operations.
WSL IV generally carries such insurance coverage as
commercial liability, property, fire, flood, earthquake,
environmental, extended coverage, and rental loss insurance with
policy specifications. WSL IV believes that the limits and
deductibles are adequate and appropriate under the
circumstances, given the relative risk of loss, the cost of such
coverage, and industry practice, including the use of master
policies and coverages covering multiple properties. There are,
however, certain types of extraordinary losses (such as
bio-terrorism) that may be either uninsurable or not
economically insurable.
|
|
NOTE
7.
|
LIMITED LIABILITY
COMPANY AGREEMENT
|
WSL IV is to terminate no later than December 31,
2052. Except as provided in WSL IVs limited liability
company agreements (the Agreements), no member shall
be personally liable for any debt, obligations, or liability of
WSL IV solely by reason of being a member of a limited
liability company.
The Agreements generally provide for contributions of funds
needed by WSL IV to be made by the members in accordance with
their respective percentage interests, as defined (currently 90%
to Walton SL and 10% to SLI). Through December 31, 2009,
contributions totaling $37,383,060 had been made by the members
of WSL IV (exclusive of SLCI, which is not required to
contribute capital) in their respective percentage interests.
The acquisition of the Communities was partially funded by
equity contributions from Walton SL and SLI totaling
$32,583,060. Pursuant to the agreement, additional capital
contributions are to be made from time to time by Walton SL and
SLI to fund WSL IVs costs. Subject to certain special
allocations of profit and losses (as defined) to cause each
members capital account to be in specified ratios, profits
and losses are to be allocated in accordance with their
respective percentage interests.
The Agreements provide that distributions of distributable cash
(as defined in the respective agreements) will be made as
follows: (i) in the ratio of percentage interests of Walton
SL and SLI until Walton SL has received an amount equal to the
20% IRR deficiency (as defined in the respective agreements),
(ii) 20% to SLCI with any remaining Distributable Cash in
the ratio of percentage interests until Walton SL has received
an amount equal to the 25% IRR Deficiency (as defined),
(iii) 25% to SLCI with any remaining distributable cash in
the ratio of percentage interests until Walton SL has received
an amount equal to the 30% IRR deficiency (as defined), and
(iv) 30% to SLCI with any remaining distributable cash in
the ratio of percentage interests. In addition, if the
management agreements, as described in note 3, are
terminated for cause (as defined), SLCI will receive no
distributions of distributable cash. Through December 31,
2009, cumulative distributions totaling $59,250,000 have been
made by WSL IV to the members in their respective
percentage interests.
F-35
WSL
Holdings IV, LLC
In April 2010, WSL IV entered into a purchase and sale agreement
with a third party purchaser to sell at a gain its membership
interests in its wholly owned subsidiaries WSL Chancellors
Village Investors IV, LLC, WSL Baywinde Investors IV, LLC, WSL
Castle Pointe Investors IV, LLC, WSL Sage Harbor Investors IV,
LLC, WSL Walden Investors IV, LLC, WSL Lake Barrington Investors
IV, LLC and WSL Bella Terra Investors IV, LLC. There can be no
assurance that the purchase and sale agreement will result in
the sale of the membership interests.
F-36
WSL
Holdings IV, LLC
Senior Lifestyle
2004 Portfolio
(SL Bella Terra,
LLC, SL Barrington, LLC, SL Walden, LLC, SL Sage Harbor, LLC, SL
Castle Pointe, LLC and SL Chancellors Village,
LLC)
Condensed combined
balance sheets
June 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009*
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
526,053
|
|
|
$
|
201,462
|
|
Cash, security deposits
|
|
|
302,022
|
|
|
|
359,147
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
98,164
|
|
|
|
86,386
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
130,722
|
|
|
|
217,845
|
|
Due from landlord
|
|
|
390,198
|
|
|
|
58,338
|
|
Leasehold improvements and equipment, net
|
|
|
621,425
|
|
|
|
680,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,068,584
|
|
|
$
|
1,603,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and members deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
605,823
|
|
|
$
|
809,428
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,777,373
|
|
|
|
1,151,223
|
|
Rent advances and other
|
|
|
510,080
|
|
|
|
474,543
|
|
Due to affiliates
|
|
|
633,485
|
|
|
|
547,430
|
|
Security deposits
|
|
|
343,993
|
|
|
|
392,075
|
|
Deferred rent
|
|
|
1,580,571
|
|
|
|
1,479,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
5,451,325
|
|
|
|
4,854,010
|
|
Members deficit
|
|
|
(3,382,741
|
)
|
|
|
(3,250,338
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and members deficit
|
|
$
|
2,068,584
|
|
|
$
|
1,603,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed combined financial statements.
* Derived from audited financial statements.
F-37
Senior Lifestyle
2004 Portfolio
(SL Bella Terra,
LLC, SL Barrington, LLC, SL Walden, LLC, SL Sage Harbor, LLC, SL
Castle Pointe, LLC and SL Chancellors Village,
LLC)
Condensed combined
statements of
operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
$
|
16,261,798
|
|
|
$
|
16,349,325
|
|
Net resident service
|
|
|
1,182,610
|
|
|
|
882,337
|
|
Other
|
|
|
42,666
|
|
|
|
79,713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
17,487,074
|
|
|
|
17,311,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
5,543,614
|
|
|
|
5,515,552
|
|
Administrative and office
|
|
|
435,943
|
|
|
|
332,738
|
|
Management and contract services
|
|
|
1,422,490
|
|
|
|
1,363,292
|
|
Rent
|
|
|
6,498,994
|
|
|
|
6,473,570
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
143,858
|
|
|
|
141,726
|
|
Utilities
|
|
|
876,834
|
|
|
|
861,348
|
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
|
723,277
|
|
|
|
780,868
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
156,941
|
|
|
|
87,675
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
100,214
|
|
|
|
91,611
|
|
Repairs and maintenance
|
|
|
708,765
|
|
|
|
744,574
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
297,628
|
|
|
|
149,616
|
|
Management fees
|
|
|
719,653
|
|
|
|
698,832
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(8,147
|
)
|
|
|
21,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
17,620,064
|
|
|
|
17,262,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(132,990
|
)
|
|
|
48,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(132,403
|
)
|
|
$
|
48,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed combined financial statements.
F-38
Senior Lifestyle
2004 Portfolio
(SL Bella Terra,
LLC, SL Barrington, LLC, SL Walden, LLC, SL Sage Harbor, LLC, SL
Castle Pointe, LLC and SL Chancellors Village,
LLC)
Condensed combined
statements of cash
flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(132,403
|
)
|
|
$
|
48,865
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
100,214
|
|
|
|
91,611
|
|
Changes in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, security deposits
|
|
|
57,125
|
|
|
|
69,517
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(11,778
|
)
|
|
|
(11,458
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
87,123
|
|
|
|
79,392
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(203,605
|
)
|
|
|
8,496
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
626,150
|
|
|
|
310,135
|
|
Rent advances and other
|
|
|
35,537
|
|
|
|
(110,590
|
)
|
Due to (from) landlord
|
|
|
(331,860
|
)
|
|
|
(203,515
|
)
|
Security deposits
|
|
|
(48,082
|
)
|
|
|
(75,901
|
)
|
Deferred rent
|
|
|
101,260
|
|
|
|
395,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
279,681
|
|
|
|
601,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of leasehold improvements and equipment
|
|
|
(41,145
|
)
|
|
|
(9,968
|
)
|
Advances to affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,987,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(41,145
|
)
|
|
|
(1,997,268
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from affiliates
|
|
|
86,055
|
|
|
|
1,176,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
86,055
|
|
|
|
1,176,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
324,591
|
|
|
|
(219,111
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
201,462
|
|
|
|
1,690,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
$
|
526,053
|
|
|
$
|
1,471,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed combined financial statements.
F-39
Senior Lifestyle
2004 Portfolio
(SL Bella Terra,
LLC, SL Barrington, LLC, SL Walden, LLC, SL Sage Harbor, LLC, SL
Castle Pointe, LLC and SL Chancellors Village,
LLC)
Notes to condensed
combined financial statements
NOTE 1. NATURE
OF OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of presentation:
The financial
statements of Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolio combine certain
wholly-owned limited liability companies of Senior Lifestyle
Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the
Owner). All significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in the presentation.
Nature of operations:
Included in these
financial statements are SL Bella Terra, LLC (Bella
Terra), a New Jersey limited liability company formed in
March 2005, SL Barrington, LLC (Lake Barrington
Woods), an Illinois limited liability company formed in
March 2005, SL Walden, LLC (Walden Place), a
Delaware limited liability company formed in October 2005, SL
Sage Harbor, LLC (Sage Harbor), a Delaware limited
liability company formed in October 2005, SL Castle Pointe, LLC
(Castle Pointe), a Delaware limited liability
company formed in October 2005, and SL Chancellors
Village, LLC (Chancellors Village), an
Illinois limited liability company formed in July 2005. These
entities were formed to enter into leases for the purpose of
operating a senior care facility at each location.
The Owner was formed on June 11, 1997 to provide management
and development services to senior living facilities throughout
the United States. Under the terms of the Owners operating
agreement, the Owner is to dissolve on the earlier of certain
events occurring or December 31, 2047. Bella Terra, Lake
Barrington Woods and Chancellors Village are wholly-owned
by the Owner and the Owner is the sole member.
Bella Terra operates and leases a
215-unit/bed
independent, assisted and special care facility located in
Jackson, New Jersey. Under the terms of Bella Terras
operating agreement, Bella Terra will terminate at the
discretion of the Owner.
Lake Barrington Woods operates and leases a
193-unit
independent and assisted living facility located in Lake
Barrington, Illinois. Under the terms of Lake Barrington
Woods operating agreement, Lake Barrington Woods will
terminate at the discretion of the Owner.
Chancellors Village operates and leases a
187-unit
independent and assisted living facility located in
Fredericksburg, Virginia. Under the terms of Chancellors
Villages operating agreement, Chancellors Village
will terminate at the discretion of the Owner.
An affiliate of the Owner, SL New York, LLC (SL New
York) is the sole member of Walden Place, Sage Harbor and
Castle Pointe (the New York Operators) formed to
lease and operate senior care facilities located in the State of
New York. The owners of SL New York are also the members of the
Owner, and except for restrictions imposed by laws of the State
of New York, the Owner, rather than SL New York, would be the
sole member of these New York Operators. At time of formation of
SL New York, an exclusive agency and nominee agreement was
entered into between SL New York and the Owner to allow the
Owner to retain all revenue and expenses of operating the New
York Operators.
Walden Place operates and leases an
80-unit/bed
assisted living and special care facility located in Cortland,
New York. Under the terms of Walden Places operating
agreement, Walden Place will terminate at the discretion of the
Owner.
F-40
Senior Lifestyle
2004 Portfolio
(SL Bella Terra,
LLC, SL Barrington, LLC, SL Walden, LLC, SL Sage Harbor, LLC, SL
Castle Pointe, LLC and SL Chancellors Village,
LLC)
Sage Harbor operates and leases a
78-unit/bed
assisted living and special care facility located in Webster,
New York. Under the terms of Sage Harbors operating
agreement, Sage Harbor will terminate at the discretion of the
Owner.
Castle Pointe operates and leases a
134-unit
independent living facility located in Webster, New York. Under
the terms of Castle Pointes operating agreement, Castle
Pointe will terminate at the discretion of the Owner.
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash and cash
equivalents include cash on hand and in banks, demand deposits,
and all other amounts with original maturities of three months
or less. The Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolio maintains cash
deposits at multiple banks, which throughout the year
periodically exceeded federally insured deposit limits. The
Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolio has not experienced any losses
in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any
significant credit risk on cash.
Receivables:
Accounts receivable are comprised
of billed but uncollected amounts due for rents, resident
services and other charges due from senior residents.
Receivables are recorded at the Senior Lifestyle 2004
Portfolios estimate of the amounts that will ultimately be
collected. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on
specific identification of uncollectible accounts and the Senior
Lifestyle 2004 Portfolios historical collection
experience. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
the allowance for doubtful accounts was $24,557 and $33,308,
respectively.
Prepaid expenses:
Prepaid expenses consist
primarily of insurance and other expenses paid in advance and
deposits
Leasehold improvements and
equipment:
Leasehold improvements and equipment
are stated at cost. Furniture and fixtures and equipment are
depreciated over estimated useful lives on a straight-line
basis, five to seven years. The cost of leasehold improvements
is amortized on the straight-line basis over the shorter of
estimated useful lives or the term of the related lease.
Deferred rent:
Certain operating leases
contain fixed escalations of the minimum annual lease payments
during the original terms of the lease. For these leases, the
Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolio recognizes rental expense on a
straight-line basis and record the difference between rent
expense and the amount currently payable under the lease as
deferred rent.
Revenue recognition:
Rental income is
recognized as earned under resident leases that typically have
terms of one year or less. Net resident service revenue consists
of room and board and ancillary charges to residents for
services such as nursing, therapy, meal preparation,
housekeeping and laundry. Income from these services is
recognized upon completion of the service. Any rental receipts
received in advance are reflected as liabilities and included in
rent advances and other.
Income taxes:
The Senior Lifestyle 2004
Portfolio is not subject to federal income tax because their
income and losses are includable in the tax returns of the
members, but may be subject to certain state taxes. The
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has
provided guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be
recognized, measured, disclosed and presented in the financial
statements. This requires the evaluation of tax positions taken
or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the
entities tax returns to determine whether the tax
positions are more-likely-than-not of being sustained when
challenged or when examined by the applicable taxing authority.
The Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolio adopted the provisions of
the
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
section of
the Income Taxes Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification on January 1, 2009. Management has determined
that there are no material uncertain tax positions.
F-41
Senior Lifestyle
2004 Portfolio
(SL Bella Terra,
LLC, SL Barrington, LLC, SL Walden, LLC, SL Sage Harbor, LLC, SL
Castle Pointe, LLC and SL Chancellors Village,
LLC)
Tax returns filed by the Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolio
generally are subject to examination by U.S. and state
taxing authorities for the years ended after December 31,
2005.
Use of estimates:
In preparing financial
statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP), management makes estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported
amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash, security deposits:
The Senior Lifestyle
2004 Portfolio has in the past received security deposits from
residents in the independent and assisted living facilities.
Cash, security deposits consist of separate security deposit
accounts that must be maintained pursuant to certain
states regulations.
Subsequent events:
The Senior Lifestyle 2004
Portfolio has evaluated subsequent events for potential
recognition and/or disclosure through July 27, 2010, the
date the financial statements were available to be issued.
NOTE 2. LEASEHOLD
IMPROVEMENTS AND EQUIPMENT
A summary of leasehold improvements and equipment at
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
$
|
338,922
|
|
|
$
|
338,922
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
658,484
|
|
|
|
658,484
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
460,553
|
|
|
|
419,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,457,959
|
|
|
|
1,416,814
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(836,534
|
)
|
|
|
(736,320
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
621,425
|
|
|
$
|
680,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 3. ACCRUED
EXPENSES
Accrued expenses and other at June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
$
|
749,869
|
|
|
$
|
711,558
|
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
|
930,625
|
|
|
|
239,524
|
|
Other
|
|
|
96,879
|
|
|
|
200,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,777,373
|
|
|
$
|
1,151,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 4. RELATED-PARTY
TRANSACTIONS AND LEASES
The Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolio has entered into various
operating leases with affiliates of the Senior Lifestyle 2004
Portfolio (the Landlords). Each lease has a two to
five-year term with expirations through June 2013. The terms of
the leases generally provide for the payment of base rent and
all operating expenses and taxes.
F-42
Senior Lifestyle
2004 Portfolio
(SL Bella Terra,
LLC, SL Barrington, LLC, SL Walden, LLC, SL Sage Harbor, LLC, SL
Castle Pointe, LLC and SL Chancellors Village,
LLC)
The Landlords, under the terms of each of the leases, have made
available a $2,000,000 line of credit per property for a total
available line of credit of $12,000,000. The lines of credit
accrue interest at the prime rate (3.25 percent at
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009) and are due
in full upon the earlier of the expiration or termination of the
leases. Monthly payment of interest and principal are due based
on available cash flow. No distributions to the Owner can occur
if any outstanding loan balance exists. At June 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009, the Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolio
had no amounts due to the Landlords under the lines of credit.
The payment of rent and lines of credit of the Owner are
cross-collateralized by the collective cash flow of the other
subsidiaries of the Owner (who have similar businesses to the
Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolio), such that any distribution
from a subsidiary to the Owner is subordinate to the outstanding
unpaid rent, and unpaid principal and accrued interest on the
line of credit due to the Landlords. In the event a subsidiary
is in default of any rent payment or any payment under the lines
of credit, then all distributions paid by the subsidiary to the
Owner during any preceding
12-month
period are required to be returned to the subsidiary to be paid
to the Landlord.
Minimum lease payments to be paid under current lease agreements
are as follows at December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
12,653,903
|
|
2011
|
|
|
13,159,564
|
|
2012
|
|
|
13,666,339
|
|
2013
|
|
|
6,516,570
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
45,996,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The leases above contain provisions for scheduled rent increases
during the term of the respective leases. Included in deferred
rent is $1,580,571 and $1,479,311 of such increases at
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively,
which will be paid in the future.
Pursuant to various management agreements, the Senior Lifestyle
2004 Portfolio pays management fees to the Owner. The management
fees are either 4 percent of gross revenue or the market
rate fee, as defined in the respective management agreements.
For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and
June 30, 2009, $719,653 and $698,823 were incurred. Unpaid
management fees were $167 and $3,250 at June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively.
Due to affiliates of $633,485 and $547,430 at June 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively, consists of amounts
received from affiliates for working capital purposes as well as
management fees payable to the Owner.
Due from landlord of $390,198 and $58,338 at June 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively, consists of advances
to the Landlords for various obligations under the leases of the
Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolio.
Amounts due to/from affiliates are non-interest bearing and due
on demand.
NOTE 5. 401(k)
SAVINGS PLAN
The Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolio has created a 401(k) savings
plan for all employees who are at least 21 years of age and
have been employed in excess of one month. The Senior Lifestyle
2004 Portfolio reserves the right to make matching contributions
at a rate determined by management, not to exceed
F-43
Senior Lifestyle
2004 Portfolio
(SL Bella Terra,
LLC, SL Barrington, LLC, SL Walden, LLC, SL Sage Harbor, LLC, SL
Castle Pointe, LLC and SL Chancellors Village,
LLC)
$1,500 per employee. Employees who participate in the plan vest
in it for a six-year period commencing in year two. The Senior
Lifestyle 2004 Portfolios contributions for the six month
periods ending June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 were
$11,662 and $11,573, respectively, and are included in salaries
and employee benefits expenses.
NOTE 6. COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
The Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolio is subject to legal
proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of
business. In the opinion of management the amount of any
ultimate liability with respect to any such claims will not
materially affect the Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolios
combined financial statements.
F-44
Senior Lifestyle
2004 Portfolio
(SL Bella Terra,
LLC, SL Barrington, LLC, SL Walden, LLC, SL Sage Harbor, LLC, SL
Castle Pointe, LLC and SL Chancellors Village,
LLC)
Independent
auditors report
To the Members
Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolio
We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheets of
Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolio (the Companies) as of December
31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, and the related combined statements of
operations, changes in members deficit and cash flows for
the years then ended. These combined financial statements are
the responsibility of the Companies management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these combined
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America. These
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of the Companies as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007, and the results of their operations, changes in
members deficit and their cash flows for the years then
ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
Chicago, Illinois
April 20, 2010
F-45
Senior Lifestyle
2004 Portfolio
(SL Bella Terra,
LLC, SL Barrington, LLC, SL Walden, LLC, SL Sage Harbor, LLC, SL
Castle Pointe, LLC and SL Chancellors Village,
LLC)
Combined balance
sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
201,462
|
|
|
$
|
1,690,946
|
|
|
$
|
681,422
|
|
Cash, security deposits
|
|
|
359,147
|
|
|
|
480,142
|
|
|
|
700,351
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
86,386
|
|
|
|
102,638
|
|
|
|
111,048
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
217,845
|
|
|
|
180,916
|
|
|
|
215,017
|
|
Due from landlord
|
|
|
58,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due from affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,380,660
|
|
|
|
27,326
|
|
Leasehold improvements and equipment, net
|
|
|
680,494
|
|
|
|
639,016
|
|
|
|
724,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,603,672
|
|
|
$
|
4,474,318
|
|
|
$
|
2,459,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Members Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
809,428
|
|
|
$
|
423,189
|
|
|
$
|
438,704
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,151,223
|
|
|
|
1,152,705
|
|
|
|
1,118,691
|
|
Rent advances and other
|
|
|
474,543
|
|
|
|
326,626
|
|
|
|
307,371
|
|
Due to Landlord
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,911,858
|
|
|
|
870,769
|
|
Due to affiliates
|
|
|
547,430
|
|
|
|
27,713
|
|
|
|
75,761
|
|
Security deposits
|
|
|
392,075
|
|
|
|
544,405
|
|
|
|
724,431
|
|
Deferred rent
|
|
|
1,479,311
|
|
|
|
681,114
|
|
|
|
221,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
4,854,010
|
|
|
|
5,067,610
|
|
|
|
3,756,748
|
|
Members deficit
|
|
|
(3,250,338
|
)
|
|
|
(593,292
|
)
|
|
|
(1,296,959
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and members deficit
|
|
$
|
1,603,672
|
|
|
$
|
4,474,318
|
|
|
$
|
2,459,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined
financial statements.
F-46
Senior Lifestyle
2004 Portfolio
(SL Bella Terra,
LLC, SL Barrington, LLC, SL Walden, LLC, SL Sage Harbor, LLC, SL
Castle Pointe, LLC and SL Chancellors Village,
LLC)
Combined statements
of operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
$
|
32,479,745
|
|
|
$
|
33,271,935
|
|
|
$
|
30,692,765
|
|
Net resident service
|
|
|
1,827,111
|
|
|
|
1,511,339
|
|
|
|
1,173,243
|
|
Other
|
|
|
106,740
|
|
|
|
166,341
|
|
|
|
102,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
34,413,596
|
|
|
|
34,949,615
|
|
|
|
31,968,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
11,314,070
|
|
|
|
11,205,148
|
|
|
|
10,851,413
|
|
Administrative and office
|
|
|
783,577
|
|
|
|
800,129
|
|
|
|
800,394
|
|
Management and contract services
|
|
|
2,823,812
|
|
|
|
2,848,186
|
|
|
|
2,670,681
|
|
Rent
|
|
|
13,108,827
|
|
|
|
12,309,905
|
|
|
|
10,474,735
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
275,217
|
|
|
|
274,704
|
|
|
|
432,474
|
|
Utilities
|
|
|
1,686,023
|
|
|
|
1,682,428
|
|
|
|
1,723,867
|
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
|
1,267,046
|
|
|
|
1,342,431
|
|
|
|
1,422,858
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
137,995
|
|
|
|
216,594
|
|
|
|
174,262
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
194,564
|
|
|
|
183,146
|
|
|
|
224,902
|
|
Repairs and maintenance
|
|
|
1,566,388
|
|
|
|
1,597,509
|
|
|
|
1,344,565
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
363,461
|
|
|
|
376,426
|
|
|
|
312,251
|
|
Management fees
|
|
|
1,389,221
|
|
|
|
1,407,729
|
|
|
|
1,241,886
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
27,650
|
|
|
|
28,426
|
|
|
|
19,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
34,937,851
|
|
|
|
34,272,761
|
|
|
|
31,693,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(524,255
|
)
|
|
|
676,854
|
|
|
|
274,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
708
|
|
|
|
27,828
|
|
|
|
14,381
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
(1,015
|
)
|
|
|
(19,078
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
26,813
|
|
|
|
(4,697
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(523,705
|
)
|
|
$
|
703,667
|
|
|
$
|
270,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined
financial statements.
F-47
Senior Lifestyle
2004 Portfolio
(SL Bella Terra,
LLC, SL Barrington, LLC, SL Walden, LLC, SL Sage Harbor, LLC, SL
Castle Pointe, LLC and SL Chancellors Village,
LLC)
Combined statements
of changes in members deficit
Years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members
|
|
|
|
deficit
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
(1,567,145
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
270,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
(1,296,959
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
703,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
(593,292
|
)
|
Distributions to members
|
|
|
(2,133,341
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(523,705
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
(3,250,338
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined
financial statements.
F-48
Senior Lifestyle
2004 Portfolio
(SL Bella Terra,
LLC, SL Barrington, LLC, SL Walden, LLC, SL Sage Harbor, LLC, SL
Castle Pointe, LLC and SL Chancellors Village,
LLC)
Combined statements
of cash flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(523,705
|
)
|
|
$
|
703,667
|
|
|
$
|
270,186
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
194,564
|
|
|
|
183,146
|
|
|
|
224,902
|
|
Changes in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, security deposits
|
|
|
120,995
|
|
|
|
220,209
|
|
|
|
344,743
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
16,252
|
|
|
|
8,410
|
|
|
|
162,628
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(36,929
|
)
|
|
|
34,101
|
|
|
|
167,632
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
386,239
|
|
|
|
(15,515
|
)
|
|
|
101,607
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
(1,482
|
)
|
|
|
34,014
|
|
|
|
152,808
|
|
Rent advances and other
|
|
|
147,917
|
|
|
|
19,255
|
|
|
|
(48,094
|
)
|
Due to (from) Landlord
|
|
|
(1,970,196
|
)
|
|
|
1,041,089
|
|
|
|
196,668
|
|
Security deposits
|
|
|
(152,330
|
)
|
|
|
(180,026
|
)
|
|
|
(209,041
|
)
|
Deferred rent
|
|
|
798,197
|
|
|
|
460,093
|
|
|
|
(722,734
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(1,020,478
|
)
|
|
|
2,508,443
|
|
|
|
641,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of leasehold improvements and equipment
|
|
|
(236,042
|
)
|
|
|
(97,537
|
)
|
|
|
(252,310
|
)
|
Repayments (advances) from (to) affiliates
|
|
|
1,380,660
|
|
|
|
(1,353,334
|
)
|
|
|
(27,326
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
1,144,618
|
|
|
|
(1,450,871
|
)
|
|
|
(279,636
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to members
|
|
|
(2,133,341
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances (repayments) from (to) affiliates
|
|
|
519,717
|
|
|
|
(48,048
|
)
|
|
|
(110,895
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(1,613,624
|
)
|
|
|
(48,048
|
)
|
|
|
(110,895
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(1,489,484
|
)
|
|
|
1,009,524
|
|
|
|
250,774
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
|
|
1,690,946
|
|
|
|
681,422
|
|
|
|
430,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year
|
|
$
|
201,462
|
|
|
$
|
1,690,946
|
|
|
$
|
681,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
158
|
|
|
$
|
1,015
|
|
|
$
|
19,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined
financial statements.
F-49
Senior Lifestyle
2004 Portfolio
(SL Bella Terra,
LLC, SL Barrington, LLC, SL Walden, LLC, SL Sage Harbor, LLC, SL
Castle Pointe, LLC and SL Chancellors Village,
LLC)
Notes to
combined financial statements
|
|
NOTE 1.
|
NATURE OF
OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Basis of presentation:
The financial
statements of Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolio combine certain
wholly-owned limited liability companies of Senior Lifestyle
Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the
Owner). All significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in the presentation.
Nature of operations:
Included in these
financial statements are SL Bella Terra, LLC (Bella
Terra), a New Jersey limited liability company formed in
March 2005, SL Barrington, LLC (Lake Barrington
Woods), an Illinois limited liability company formed in
March 2005, SL Walden, LLC (Walden Place), a
Delaware limited liability company formed in October 2005, SL
Sage Harbor, LLC (Sage Harbor), a Delaware limited
liability company formed in October 2005, SL Castle Pointe, LLC
(Castle Pointe), a Delaware limited liability
company formed in October 2005, and SL Chancellors
Village, LLC (Chancellors Village), an
Illinois limited liability company formed in July 2005. These
entities were formed to enter into leases for the purpose of
operating a senior health care facility at each location.
The Owner was formed on June 11, 1997 to provide management
and development services to senior living facilities throughout
the United States. Under the terms of the Owners operating
agreement, the Owner is to dissolve on the earlier of certain
events occurring on or before December 31, 2047. Bella
Terra, Lake Barrington Woods and Chancellors Village are
wholly-owned by the Owner and the Owner is the sole member.
Bella Terra operates and leases a
215-unit/bed
independent, assisted and special care facility located in
Jackson, New Jersey. Under the terms of Bella Terras
operating agreement, Bella Terra will terminate at the
discretion of the Owner.
Lake Barrington Woods operates and leases a
193-unit
independent and assisted living facility located in Lake
Barrington, Illinois. Under the terms of Lake Barrington
Woods operating agreement, Lake Barrington Woods will
terminate at the discretion of the Owner.
Chancellors Village operates and leases a
187-unit
independent and assisted living facility located in
Fredericksburg, Virginia. Under the terms of Chancellors
Villages operating agreement, Chancellors Village
will terminate at the discretion of the Owner.
An affiliate of the Owner, SL New York, LLC (SL New
York) is the sole member of Walden Place, Sage Harbor and
Castle Pointe (the New York Operators) formed to
lease and operate senior health care facilities located in the
State of New York. The owners of SL New York are also the
members of the Owner, and except for restrictions imposed by
laws of the State of New York, the Owner, rather than SL New
York, would be the sole member of these New York Operators. At
the time of formation of SL New York, an exclusive agency and
nominee agreement was entered into between SL New York and the
Owner to allow the Owner to retain all revenue and expenses of
operating the New York Operators.
Walden Place operates and leases an
80-unit/bed
assisted living and special care facility located in Cortland,
New York. Under the terms of Walden Places operating
agreement, Walden Place will terminate at the discretion of the
Owner.
F-50
Senior Lifestyle
2004 Portfolio
(SL Bella Terra,
LLC, SL Barrington, LLC, SL Walden, LLC, SL Sage Harbor, LLC, SL
Castle Pointe, LLC and SL Chancellors Village,
LLC)
Sage Harbor operates and leases a
78-unit/bed
assisted living and special care facility located in Webster,
New York. Under the terms of Sage Harbors operating
agreement, Sage Harbor will terminate at the discretion of the
Owner.
Castle Pointe operates and leases a
134-unit
independent living facility located in Webster, New York. Under
the terms of Castle Pointes operating agreement, Castle
Pointe will terminate at the discretion of the Owner.
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash and cash
equivalents include cash on hand and in banks, demand deposits,
and all other amounts with original maturities of three months
or less. The Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolio maintains cash
deposits at multiple banks, which throughout 2009 periodically
exceeded federally insured deposit limits. The Senior Lifestyle
2004 Portfolio has not experienced any losses in such accounts
and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on
cash.
Receivables:
Accounts receivable are comprised
of billed but uncollected amounts due for rents, resident
services and other charges due from senior residents.
Receivables are recorded at the Senior Lifestyle 2004
Portfolios estimate of the amounts that will ultimately be
collected. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on
specific identification of uncollectible accounts and the Senior
Lifestyle 2004 Portfolios historical collection
experience. At December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the
allowance for doubtful accounts was $33,308, $11,860 and
$20,753, respectively.
Prepaid expenses:
Prepaid expenses consist
primarily of insurance and other expenses paid in advance and
deposits.
Property and equipment:
Property and equipment
are stated at cost. Property and equipment are depreciated over
estimated useful lives on a straight-line basis, five to seven
years. The cost of leasehold improvements is amortized on a
straight-line basis over the shorter of estimated useful lives
or the term of the related lease.
Deferred rent:
Certain operating leases
contain fixed escalations of the minimum annual lease payments
during the original terms of the lease. For these leases, the
Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolio recognizes rental expense on a
straight-line basis and records the difference between rent
expense and the amount currently payable under the lease as
deferred rent.
Revenue recognition:
Rental income is
recognized as earned under resident leases that typically have
terms of one year or less. Net resident service revenue consists
of room and board and ancillary charges to residents for
services such as nursing, therapy, meal preparation,
housekeeping and laundry. Income from these services is
recognized upon completion of the service. Any rental receipts
received in advance are reflected as liabilities and included in
rent advances and other.
Income taxes:
The Senior Lifestyle 2004
Portfolio is not subject to federal income tax because its
income and losses are includable in the tax returns of their
members, but may be subject to certain state taxes. The
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has
provided guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be
recognized, measured, disclosed and presented in the financial
statements. This requires the evaluation of tax positions taken
or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the
entities tax returns to determine whether the tax
positions are more-likely-than-not to be sustained when
challenged or when examined by the applicable taxing authority.
The Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolio adopted the provisions of
the
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
section of
the Income Taxes Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification on January 1, 2009. For the year ended
December 31, 2009, management has determined that there are
no material uncertain tax positions.
F-51
Senior Lifestyle
2004 Portfolio
(SL Bella Terra,
LLC, SL Barrington, LLC, SL Walden, LLC, SL Sage Harbor, LLC, SL
Castle Pointe, LLC and SL Chancellors Village,
LLC)
Tax returns filed by the Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolio
generally are subject to examination by U.S. and state
taxing authorities for the years ended after December 31,
2005.
Use of estimates:
In preparing financial
statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP), management makes estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported
amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash, security deposits:
The Senior Lifestyle
2004 Portfolio has in the past received security deposits from
residents in independent and assisted living facilities. Cash,
security deposits consists of separate security deposit accounts
that must be maintained pursuant to certain states
regulations.
Subsequent events:
The Senior Lifestyle 2004
Portfolio has evaluated subsequent events for potential
recognition
and/or
disclosure through April 20, 2010, the date the combined
financial statements were available to be issued.
|
|
NOTE 2.
|
LEASEHOLD
IMPROVEMENTS AND EQUIPMENT
|
A summary of leasehold improvements and equipment, net, at
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
$
|
338,922
|
|
|
$
|
317,784
|
|
|
$
|
249,594
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
658,484
|
|
|
|
469,681
|
|
|
|
451,066
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
419,408
|
|
|
|
393,307
|
|
|
|
382,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements and equipment
|
|
|
1,416,814
|
|
|
|
1,180,772
|
|
|
|
1,083,235
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(736,320
|
)
|
|
|
(541,756
|
)
|
|
|
(358,610
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
680,494
|
|
|
$
|
639,016
|
|
|
$
|
724,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
$
|
711,558
|
|
|
$
|
640,417
|
|
|
$
|
523,869
|
|
Real estate taxesadditional rent
|
|
|
239,524
|
|
|
|
310,214
|
|
|
|
374,132
|
|
Other
|
|
|
200,141
|
|
|
|
202,074
|
|
|
|
220,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
1,151,223
|
|
|
$
|
1,152,705
|
|
|
$
|
1,118,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 4.
|
RELATED-PARTY
TRANSACTIONS AND LEASES
|
The Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolio has entered into various
operating leases with affiliates of the Senior Lifestyle 2004
Portfolio (the Landlords). Each lease has a two to
five-year term with expirations through June 2013. The terms of
the leases generally provide for the payment of base rent and
all operating expenses and taxes.
The Landlords, under the terms of each of the leases, have made
available a $2,000,000 line of credit per property for a total
available line of credit of $12,000,000. The lines of credit
accrue interest at the
F-52
Senior Lifestyle
2004 Portfolio
(SL Bella Terra,
LLC, SL Barrington, LLC, SL Walden, LLC, SL Sage Harbor, LLC, SL
Castle Pointe, LLC and SL Chancellors Village,
LLC)
prime rate (3.25 percent, 3.25 percent, and
7.00 percent at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively) and are due in full upon the earlier of the
expiration or termination of the leases. Monthly payment of
interest and principal are due based on available cash flow. No
distributions to the Owner can occur if any outstanding loan
balance exists.
The payment of rent and lines of credit of the Owner are
cross-collateralized by the collective cash flow of the other
subsidiaries of the Owner (who have similar businesses to the
Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolio), such that any distribution
from a subsidiary to the Owner is subordinate to the outstanding
unpaid rent and unpaid principal and accrued interest on the
line of credit due to the Landlords. In the event a subsidiary
is in default of any rent payment or any payment under the lines
of credit, then all distributions paid by the subsidiary to the
Owner during any preceding
12-month
period are required to be returned to the subsidiary to be paid
to the Landlord. Amounts drawn under the lines of credit at
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $0, $65,000 and
$65,000, respectively, and any amounts for the Senior Lifestyle
2004 Portfolio are included in Due to Landlord in the
accompanying combined balance sheets.
Other
Minimum lease payments to be paid in the future under current
lease agreements are as follows at December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
12,653,903
|
|
2011
|
|
|
13,159,564
|
|
2012
|
|
|
13,666,339
|
|
2013
|
|
|
6,516,570
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
45,996,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The leases above contain provisions for scheduled rent increases
during the term of the respective leases. Included in deferred
rent are $1,479,311, $681,114, and $221,021 of such increases at
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, which will
be paid in the future.
Certain of the leases with the Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolio
require percentage rent, as defined. These amounts are listed as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
rent
|
|
|
Percentage
rent
|
|
|
Percentage
rent
|
|
|
|
incurred as of
|
|
|
incurred as of
|
|
|
incurred as of
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Bella Terra
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,559
|
|
|
$
|
5,513
|
|
Barrington
|
|
|
62,833
|
|
|
|
134,945
|
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
Walden Place
|
|
|
47,929
|
|
|
|
32,900
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
Sage Harbor
|
|
|
8,645
|
|
|
|
20,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
Castle Pointe
|
|
|
30,731
|
|
|
|
38,642
|
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
Chancellors Village
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
150,138
|
|
|
$
|
230,566
|
|
|
$
|
93,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to various management agreements, the Senior Lifestyle
2004 Portfolio pays management fees to the Owner. The management
fees are either four percent of gross revenue or the market rate
fee, as
F-53
Senior Lifestyle
2004 Portfolio
(SL Bella Terra,
LLC, SL Barrington, LLC, SL Walden, LLC, SL Sage Harbor, LLC, SL
Castle Pointe, LLC and SL Chancellors Village,
LLC)
defined in the respective management agreements. For the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, $1,389,222,
$1,407,729 and $1,241,886 were incurred, of which $3,250, $2,758
and $6,140 was unpaid at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
The amounts due from affiliates of $0, $1,380,660, and $27,326
at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, consist
of advances to affiliates for working capital purposes.
The amounts due to affiliates of $547,430, $27,713 and $75,761
at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, consist
of amounts received from affiliates for working capital purposes
as well as management fees payable to the Owner.
The amounts due from the Landlords of $58,338 at
December 31, 2009 and due to the Landlords of $1,911,858
and $870,769 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively,
consist of advances to or from the Landlords for various
obligations under the leases of the Senior Lifestyle 2004
Portfolio.
Amounts due to/from affiliates are non-interest bearing and due
on demand.
Distributions to members in the year ended December 31,
2009 of $2,133,341 were made utilizing cash on hand and
repayments of advances received from related parties.
|
|
NOTE 5.
|
401(K) SAVINGS
PLAN
|
The Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolio has created a 401(k) savings
plan for all employees who are at least 21 years of age and
have been employed in excess of one month. The Senior Lifestyle
2004 Portfolio reserves the right to make matching contributions
at a rate determined by management, not to exceed $1,500 per
employee. Employees who participate in the plan vest in it for a
six-year period commencing in year two. The Senior Lifestyle
2004 Portfolios contributions for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $24,291, $25,886 and
$5,305, respectively, and are included in salaries and employee
benefits expenses.
|
|
NOTE 6.
|
COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
|
The Senior Lifestyle 2004 Portfolio purchases professional and
general liability insurance to cover malpractice claims. There
are no known claims or litigation arising from services provided
to residents.
F-54
Senior Lifestyle
Jupiter, L.P.
Condensed balance
sheets
June 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009*
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
699,471
|
|
|
$
|
1,773,413
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
55,488
|
|
|
|
42,053
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
150,661
|
|
|
|
145,502
|
|
Mortgage escrows
|
|
|
473,861
|
|
|
|
261,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,379,481
|
|
|
|
2,222,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
2,362,173
|
|
|
|
2,362,173
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
27,119,684
|
|
|
|
27,078,987
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
1,576,602
|
|
|
|
1,468,352
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(7,217,232
|
)
|
|
|
(6,717,084
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
23,841,227
|
|
|
|
24,192,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due from affiliates
|
|
|
254,477
|
|
|
|
248,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred costs
|
|
|
268,477
|
|
|
|
323,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
25,743,662
|
|
|
$
|
26,986,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and partners capital (deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage payablecurrent portion
|
|
$
|
505,652
|
|
|
$
|
247,828
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
168,272
|
|
|
|
209,124
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
360,722
|
|
|
|
259,204
|
|
Prepaid rent
|
|
|
41,920
|
|
|
|
183,041
|
|
Advance deposits
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,085,566
|
|
|
|
907,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage payable
|
|
|
32,519,348
|
|
|
|
32,777,172
|
|
Due to affiliates
|
|
|
20,529
|
|
|
|
24,785
|
|
Deferred entrance fees
|
|
|
702,220
|
|
|
|
913,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
33,242,097
|
|
|
|
33,715,927
|
|
Partners capital (deficit)
|
|
|
(8,584,001
|
)
|
|
|
(7,637,073
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and partners capital (deficit)
|
|
$
|
25,743,662
|
|
|
$
|
26,986,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed financial statements.
* Derived from audited financial statements.
F-55
Senior Lifestyle
Jupiter, L.P.
Condensed statements
of operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income
|
|
$
|
3,679,649
|
|
|
$
|
3,766,921
|
|
Net resident services
|
|
|
530,139
|
|
|
|
494,258
|
|
Membership fees
|
|
|
211,350
|
|
|
|
244,700
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,352
|
|
|
|
4,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,422,490
|
|
|
|
4,510,209
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and related payroll costs
|
|
|
1,130,231
|
|
|
|
1,073,320
|
|
Administrative and general
|
|
|
563,843
|
|
|
|
554,983
|
|
Utilities
|
|
|
211,843
|
|
|
|
274,982
|
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
|
162,738
|
|
|
|
157,966
|
|
Property management fees
|
|
|
221,190
|
|
|
|
225,294
|
|
Repairs and maintenance
|
|
|
183,951
|
|
|
|
141,373
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
36,400
|
|
|
|
27,349
|
|
Insurance expense
|
|
|
163,974
|
|
|
|
212,463
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
500,148
|
|
|
|
500,148
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
54,674
|
|
|
|
47,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,228,992
|
|
|
|
3,215,380
|
|
Other expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
390,426
|
|
|
|
439,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
803,072
|
|
|
$
|
854,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed financial statements.
F-56
Senior Lifestyle
Jupiter, L.P.
Condensed statements
of cash flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
803,072
|
|
|
$
|
854,886
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
554,822
|
|
|
|
547,650
|
|
Amortization of membership contracts
|
|
|
(211,350
|
)
|
|
|
(244,700
|
)
|
Changes in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate tax and interest escrow
|
|
|
(183,820
|
)
|
|
|
188,359
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(13,435
|
)
|
|
|
(11,766
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(5,159
|
)
|
|
|
167,437
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(40,853
|
)
|
|
|
(6,637
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
101,518
|
|
|
|
61,282
|
|
Advance deposits and prepaid rent
|
|
|
(140,121
|
)
|
|
|
(90,688
|
)
|
Increase in deferred revenue and refundable entrance fees
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
220,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
864,274
|
|
|
|
1,686,573
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replacement reserve deposits
|
|
|
(28,836
|
)
|
|
|
(29,072
|
)
|
Additions to property and equipment
|
|
|
(148,946
|
)
|
|
|
(29,787
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(177,782
|
)
|
|
|
(58,859
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances (repayments) from (to) affiliates
|
|
|
(10,434
|
)
|
|
|
155,441
|
|
Payment of deferred mortgage costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(765
|
)
|
Distributions to partners
|
|
|
(1,750,000
|
)
|
|
|
(500,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(1,760,434
|
)
|
|
|
(345,324
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(1,073,942
|
)
|
|
|
1,282,390
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
1,773,413
|
|
|
|
221,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
$
|
699,471
|
|
|
$
|
1,504,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
283,214
|
|
|
$
|
317,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed financial statements.
F-57
Senior Lifestyle
Jupiter, L.P.
Notes to condensed
financial statements
|
|
NOTE 1.
|
PARTNERSHIP
FORMATION AND ORGANIZATION
|
Senior Lifestyle Jupiter, L.P. (SL Jupiter), an
Illinois limited partnership, was originally formed in 1992 as
Mangrove Bay Master Limited Partnership (MBMLP). On
June 30, 1999, the MBMLP partnership agreement was amended
and restated to provide for, among other things, a name change
and admittance of additional partners. SL Jupiter was formed to
develop, own, and operate an independent and assisted senior
living community located in Jupiter, Florida. The community is
comprised of 101 independent living units, 54 assisted living
units and 26 single-story villas and two guest suites. The 26
single-story villas were sold in 2002.
|
|
NOTE 2.
|
SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash and cash
equivalents includes cash on hand and in banks, demand deposits
and all other amounts with original maturities of three months
or less. SL Jupiter maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts
with balances which, at times, may have exceeded federally
insured limits. SL Jupiter believes it is not exposed to any
significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents.
Accounts receivable:
Accounts receivable is
comprised of billed but uncollected amounts due for rents,
resident services and other charges. Receivables are recorded at
an estimate of the amounts that will ultimately be collected.
The allowance for doubtful accounts (if any) is based on
specific identification of uncollectible accounts and SL
Jupiters historical collection experience. At
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the allowance for
doubtful accounts was $0 and $1,844, respectively.
Property and equipment:
Depreciation of
buildings, related improvements and land improvements is
computed using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives from 15 to 40 years. Depreciation of
furniture, fixtures and equipment is computed using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives from five
to seven years.
Impairment:
Long-lived assets, such as
investment property, and purchased intangibles subject to
amortization are reviewed for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be
held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount
of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected
to be generated by the asset. if the carrying amount of an asset
exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is
recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the
asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. No impairment charges
were required at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented in the
balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount
or fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated.
The assets and liabilities of a disposed group classified as
held for sale would be presented separately in the appropriate
asset and liability sections of the balance sheet.
Revenue recognition:
Rental income is
recognized as earned under tenant leases that typically have
terms of one year or less. Amounts received in advance are
deferred as prepaid rent. Net resident services revenue consists
of ancillary charges to tenants for services related to personal
care and assistance with activities of daily living. Income from
these services is recognized upon completion of the service.
Income taxes:
SL Jupiter is not subject to
federal income tax because its income and losses are, includable
in the tax returns of its partners, but may be subject to
certain state taxes. SL Jupiter evaluates tax positions taken or
expected to be taken in the course of preparing the
entitys tax returns
F-58
Senior Lifestyle
Jupiter, L.P.
to determine whether the tax positions are
more-likely-than-not of being sustained when
challenged or when examined by the applicable
taxing authority.
SL Jupiter adopted the provisions of the
Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes
section of the Income Taxes
Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Accounting Standards Codification on
January 1, 2009. Management has determined that there are
no material uncertain income tax positions.
Tax returns filed by the entity generally are subject to
examination by U.S. and state taxing authorities for years
ended after December 31, 2005.
Deferred and refundable entrance
fees:
Residents of the rented units generally
enter into membership contracts whereby the resident pays an
entrance fee. Under most membership agreements, 10 to
50 percent of entrance fees are refundable to the resident
in accordance with SL Jupiters residency agreements.
The remaining amount of the entrance fees is accounted for as
deferred revenue included in the balance of other liabilities,
and 10 to 50 percent is recognized each year, depending on
the agreement, ($211,350 and $244,700 for the six month periods
ending June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively) as membership
fee revenue. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
the deferred revenue and refundable deposits were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred entrance fees
|
|
$
|
253,800
|
|
|
$
|
359,850
|
|
Refundable entrance fees
|
|
|
448,420
|
|
|
|
554,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
702,220
|
|
|
$
|
913,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SL Jupiter does not have any additional obligation to
perform future services related to these membership contracts.
Deferred costs:
Loan fees and costs incurred
in connection with obtaining the mortgage loan have been
capitalized and are being amortized over the term of the loan
using the straight-line method. At June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, accumulated amortization totaled
$191,714 and $145,703.
Use of estimates:
In preparing financial
statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP), management makes estimates and
assumptions which affect amounts reported in the financial
statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ
from these estimates and assumptions.
Subsequent events:
The Partnership has
evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition and/or
disclosure through July 27, 2010, the date the financial
statements were available to be issued.
On June 29, 2005, SL Jupiter amended and restated the
existing promissory note and the guaranty which required monthly
payments of interest and, commencing July 10, 2006,
principal payments in the amount of $31,871. The loan provided
for interest at varying rates (7.24 percent at
December 31, 2007). The loan was guaranteed by William B.
Kaplan and James B. Klutznick (the Guarantors) for
the payment of losses to the lender for recourse obligations and
for the outstanding loan balance to the extent of breach of
certain representations, warranties and performance.
During 2007, SL Jupiter paid an extension fee of $61,624
and exercised its option to extend the loan to January 23,
2008. On January 22, 2008, SL Jupiter entered into the
Tenth Extension and Modification
F-59
Senior Lifestyle
Jupiter, L.P.
Agreement which extended the loan to March 24, 2008. In
March 2008, SL Jupiter entered into the Eleventh Extension
and Modification Agreement which extended the maturity date of
the loan until May 24, 2008.
On June 5, 2008, SL Jupiter refinanced the existing
loan with a new mortgage loan in the principal amount of
$33,025,000. The new mortgage loan requires monthly payments of
real estate tax, replacement reserve escrows and interest only
computed on a variable rate through June 1, 2010 at which
time monthly payments of mortgage escrows, principal and
interest are required through June 1, 2013 (maturity date).
SL Jupiter has the option to convert the loan to a fixed
interest rate and modify the terms of the loan, provided certain
conditions are met. The loan is secured by a mortgage, a
security interest in the cash and escrow accounts and a
collateral assignment of all rents and leases. SL Jupiter
has the option to prepay the loan subject to prepayment
penalties, as defined.
Principal maturities of long-term debt as of December 31,
2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
247,828
|
|
2011
|
|
|
517,492
|
|
2012
|
|
|
537,720
|
|
2013
|
|
|
31,721,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
33,025,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 4.
|
RELATED-PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
|
SL Jupiter had the following unsecured amounts due to
affiliates at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Lifestyle Corporation
|
|
|
18,080
|
|
|
$
|
15,375
|
|
SL Jupiter, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,145
|
|
Due to others
|
|
|
2,448
|
|
|
|
6,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to affiliates
|
|
$
|
20,528
|
|
|
$
|
24,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SL Jupiter had the following unsecured amounts due from
affiliates at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Mangrove Bay Investors, LLC
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,650
|
|
Mangrove Bay Property Owners Association, Inc.
|
|
|
254,477
|
|
|
|
223,649
|
|
Due from others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due from affiliates
|
|
$
|
254,477
|
|
|
$
|
248,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All affiliates referenced above are related to SL Jupiter
through common ownership and management. Amounts due from
Mangrove Bay Property Owners Association, Inc. (the
Association) will be collected based on available
cash flow. SL Jupiter has agreements with Senior Lifestyle
Management, LLC (SLM), for management of the
facility. SL Jupiter pays a management fee to SLM equal to
5 percent of gross rental income. The amount incurred for
management fees was $221,190 and $225,294 at June 30, 2010
and June 30, 2009, respectively.
F-60
Senior Lifestyle
Jupiter, L.P.
Additionally, Walton SL Jupiter Investors GP IV,
L.L.C. (Walton) entered into a consulting agreement
with SLM for a fee equal to 10 percent of the management
fees received by SLM from SL Jupiter in connection with the
management and operation of the community, provided the fees
received exceed 4 percent of the gross receipts of
SL Jupiter.
Any time after December 31, 2006, Mangrove Bay Investors,
LLC (Mangrove Bay) or Walton may elect to cause a
sale of all the assets of SL Jupiter to a third party
pursuant to certain requirements. Either Mangrove Bay or Walton,
as part of the arrangement, may purchase the others
interest, as defined.
Distributions to members for the six months ended June 30,
2010, of $1,750,000 were made utilizing cash on hand and cash
flow from operating activities.
SL Jupiter is subject to quarterly and special assessments
from the Association for its allocable share of common area
grounds expenses of the community. During the six month periods
ending June 30, 2010 and 2009, SL Jupiter was billed
approximately $82,000 and $78,000, respectively, related to
these costs.
|
|
NOTE 6.
|
PARTNERSHIP
AGREEMENT
|
On June 25, 2004, SL Jupiter amended and restated its
partnership agreement to provide for all profit, loss and
distributions to be allocated in proportion to partners
ownership interests as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
SL Jupiter, LLC (General Partner)
|
|
|
0.188%
|
|
Mangrove Bay Investors, L.L.C. (limited partner)
|
|
|
43.676%
|
|
Senior Lifestyle Contribution Company, L.L.C. (limited partner)
(SLCC)
|
|
|
6.230%
|
|
Walton SL Jupiter Investors IV, L.L.C. (limited partner)
|
|
|
49.906%
|
|
The partnership agreement provides for a 20 percent return,
compounded monthly, on all capital contributions and partner
loans made by Walton. All amounts owed to affiliates of
SL Jupiter at June 1, 2004 are subordinate to this
return. This return was distributed to Walton in its entirety in
2008.
Effective January 1, 2006, the partners executed an
amendment to the partnership agreement that provides for
allocations as follows:
a. Profits are generally allocated to the extent of
losses and distributions previously allocated; the remainder in
proportion to SL Jupiter ownership percentages.
b. Losses are allocated to the extent of profits
previously allocated; the remainder in proportion to
SL Jupiter ownership percentages.
c. Distributions are allocated to the partners in
accordance with the terms of the partnership agreement and
provide for preferential returns based on the performance of
SL Jupiter. In July 2006, SLCC assigned some of its
preferential returns to Senior Lifestyle CI-II, LLC
(SLCI), an affiliate. Distributions are allocated as
follows:
(i) To all partners pro rata until Walton has
received a 20 percent return (as defined).
(ii) To SLCI and Walton, at 9.98 and
39.92 percent of the distributable cash, respectively, the
remainder to the General Partner, Mangrove and SLCC based on
ownership percentages until Walton receives a 25 percent
return.
F-61
Senior Lifestyle
Jupiter, L.P.
(iii) To SLCI and Walton, at 12.47 and
37.43 percent of the distributable cash, respectively, the
remainder to the General Partner, Mangrove and SLCC based on
ownership percentages until Walton receives a 30 percent
return.
(iv) To SLCI and Walton, at 14.97 and
34.93 percent of the distributable cash, respectively, the
remainder to the General Partner, Mangrove and SLCC based on
ownership percentages.
SL Jupiter is subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise
in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of
management, the amount of any ultimate liability with respect to
these actions will not materially affect SL Jupiters
financial statements.
F-62
Senior Lifestyle
Jupiter, L.P.
Independent
auditors report
To the
Partners
Senior Lifestyle Jupiter, L.P.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Senior
Lifestyle Jupiter, L.P. as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007, and the related statements of operations, changes in
partners capital (deficit) and cash flows for the years
then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Partnerships management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of Senior Lifestyle Jupiter, L.P. as of December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007, and the results of its operations, changes in
partners capital (deficit) and its cash flows for the
years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
Chicago, Illinois
March 22, 2010
F-63
Senior Lifestyle
Jupiter, L.P.
Balance sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,773,413
|
|
|
$
|
221,622
|
|
|
$
|
332,189
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
42,053
|
|
|
|
42,866
|
|
|
|
87,183
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
145,502
|
|
|
|
598,223
|
|
|
|
209,618
|
|
Mortgage escrows
|
|
|
261,205
|
|
|
|
221,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,222,173
|
|
|
|
1,084,655
|
|
|
|
628,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
2,362,173
|
|
|
|
2,362,173
|
|
|
|
2,362,173
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
27,078,987
|
|
|
|
26,886,767
|
|
|
|
26,789,311
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
1,468,352
|
|
|
|
1,478,297
|
|
|
|
1,356,575
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(6,717,084
|
)
|
|
|
(5,743,613
|
)
|
|
|
(4,743,395
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
24,192,428
|
|
|
|
24,983,624
|
|
|
|
25,764,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due from affiliates
|
|
|
248,299
|
|
|
|
387,801
|
|
|
|
185,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred costs
|
|
|
323,151
|
|
|
|
417,075
|
|
|
|
10,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
26,986,051
|
|
|
$
|
26,873,155
|
|
|
$
|
26,589,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and partners capital (deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage payablecurrent portion
|
|
$
|
247,828
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,426,320
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
209,124
|
|
|
|
156,233
|
|
|
|
148,036
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
259,204
|
|
|
|
184,861
|
|
|
|
388,530
|
|
Prepaid rent
|
|
|
183,041
|
|
|
|
131,120
|
|
|
|
125,567
|
|
Advance deposits
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
13,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
907,197
|
|
|
|
483,714
|
|
|
|
25,101,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage payable
|
|
|
32,777,172
|
|
|
|
33,025,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to affiliates
|
|
|
24,785
|
|
|
|
14,848
|
|
|
|
19,200
|
|
Deferred entrance fees
|
|
|
913,970
|
|
|
|
991,255
|
|
|
|
1,267,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
33,715,927
|
|
|
|
34,031,103
|
|
|
|
1,286,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners capital (deficit)
|
|
|
(7,637,073
|
)
|
|
|
(7,641,662
|
)
|
|
|
200,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and partners capital (deficit)
|
|
$
|
26,986,051
|
|
|
$
|
26,873,155
|
|
|
$
|
26,589,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
F-64
Senior Lifestyle
Jupiter, L.P.
Statement of
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income
|
|
$
|
7,512,856
|
|
|
$
|
7,491,856
|
|
|
$
|
7,705,893
|
|
Net resident services
|
|
|
983,340
|
|
|
|
860,072
|
|
|
|
842,601
|
|
Membership fees
|
|
|
467,660
|
|
|
|
461,460
|
|
|
|
465,460
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
6,485
|
|
|
|
12,969
|
|
|
|
16,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales and revenue
|
|
|
8,970,341
|
|
|
|
8,826,357
|
|
|
|
9,030,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and related payroll costs
|
|
|
2,171,078
|
|
|
|
2,134,101
|
|
|
|
2,363,263
|
|
Administrative and general
|
|
|
1,127,113
|
|
|
|
1,320,047
|
|
|
|
1,242,530
|
|
Utilities
|
|
|
559,414
|
|
|
|
579,585
|
|
|
|
559,417
|
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
|
312,559
|
|
|
|
305,921
|
|
|
|
284,647
|
|
Property management fees
|
|
|
448,193
|
|
|
|
440,536
|
|
|
|
450,698
|
|
Repairs and maintenance
|
|
|
317,401
|
|
|
|
358,410
|
|
|
|
157,584
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
73,869
|
|
|
|
85,278
|
|
|
|
71,140
|
|
Insurance expense
|
|
|
432,451
|
|
|
|
425,663
|
|
|
|
568,519
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
973,471
|
|
|
|
1,000,218
|
|
|
|
982,778
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
98,029
|
|
|
|
178,356
|
|
|
|
87,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
6,513,578
|
|
|
|
6,828,115
|
|
|
|
6,768,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(952,174
|
)
|
|
|
(1,401,692
|
)
|
|
|
(1,989,196
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,504,589
|
|
|
$
|
596,550
|
|
|
$
|
272,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
F-65
Senior Lifestyle
Jupiter, L.P.
Statement of changes
in partners capital (deficit)
Years ended December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
|
|
|
Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
|
|
|
Partners
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
(136
|
)
|
|
$
|
(72,277
|
)
|
|
$
|
(72,413
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
272,299
|
|
|
|
272,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
200,022
|
|
|
|
200,399
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
1,122
|
|
|
|
595,428
|
|
|
|
596,550
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
(15,864
|
)
|
|
|
(8,422,747
|
)
|
|
|
(8,438,611
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
(14,365
|
)
|
|
|
(7,627,297
|
)
|
|
|
(7,641,662
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
2,829
|
|
|
|
1,501,760
|
|
|
|
1,504,589
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
(2,820
|
)
|
|
|
(1,497,180
|
)
|
|
|
(1,500,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
(14,356
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,622,717
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,637,073
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
F-66
Senior Lifestyle
Jupiter, L.P.
Statement of cash
flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,504,589
|
|
|
$
|
596,550
|
|
|
$
|
272,812
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,071,500
|
|
|
|
1,178,574
|
|
|
|
1,070,604
|
|
Amortization of membership contracts
|
|
|
(467,660
|
)
|
|
|
(461,460
|
)
|
|
|
(465,460
|
)
|
Changes in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate tax and interest escrow
|
|
|
18,713
|
|
|
|
83,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
44,317
|
|
|
|
11,494
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
452,721
|
|
|
|
(388,605
|
)
|
|
|
55,989
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,065
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
52,892
|
|
|
|
8,196
|
|
|
|
(57,678
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
74,343
|
|
|
|
(203,669
|
)
|
|
|
(306
|
)
|
Advance deposits and prepaid rent
|
|
|
48,421
|
|
|
|
3,553
|
|
|
|
110,099
|
|
Increase in deferred revenue and refundable entrance fees
|
|
|
549,740
|
|
|
|
536,000
|
|
|
|
564,200
|
|
Refunds of membership entrance fees
|
|
|
(159,365
|
)
|
|
|
(351,025
|
)
|
|
|
(374,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
3,146,707
|
|
|
|
1,046,368
|
|
|
|
1,258,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replacement reserve deposits
|
|
|
(57,974
|
)
|
|
|
(68,674
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property and equipment
|
|
|
(182,276
|
)
|
|
|
(219,178
|
)
|
|
|
(226,748
|
)
|
Real estate tax escrow funded from debt proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(237,206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(240,250
|
)
|
|
|
(525,058
|
)
|
|
|
(226,748
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from mortgage loan, net of escrows funded
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,025,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage principal payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,426,320
|
)
|
|
|
(382,453
|
)
|
Advances to affiliates
|
|
|
149,439
|
|
|
|
(206,786
|
)
|
|
|
(400,675
|
)
|
Payment of deferred mortgage costs
|
|
|
(4,105
|
)
|
|
|
(585,160
|
)
|
|
|
(61,624
|
)
|
Distributions to partners
|
|
|
(1,500,000
|
)
|
|
|
(8,438,611
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(1,354,666
|
)
|
|
|
(631,877
|
)
|
|
|
(844,752
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,551,791
|
|
|
|
(110,567
|
)
|
|
|
186,619
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
|
|
221,622
|
|
|
|
332,189
|
|
|
|
145,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year
|
|
$
|
1,773,413
|
|
|
$
|
221,622
|
|
|
$
|
332,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
812,158
|
|
|
$
|
1,550,011
|
|
|
$
|
2,014,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-67
Senior Lifestyle
Jupiter, L.P.
Notes to financial
statements
|
|
NOTE 1.
|
PARTNERSHIP
FORMATION AND ORGANIZATION
|
Senior Lifestyle Jupiter, L.P. (SL Jupiter), an
Illinois limited partnership, was originally formed in 1992 as
Mangrove Bay Master Limited Partnership (the MBMLP).
On June 30, 1999, the MBMLP partnership agreement was
amended and restated to provide for, among other things, a name
change and admittance of additional partners. SL Jupiter was
formed to develop, own, and operate an independent and assisted
senior living community located in Jupiter, Florida. The
community is comprised of 101 independent living units,
54 assisted living units and 26 single-story villas
and two guest suites. The 26 single-story villas were sold
in 2002.
|
|
NOTE 2.
|
SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash and cash
equivalents include cash on hand and in banks, demand deposits
and all other amounts with original maturities of three months
or less. SL Jupiter maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts
with balances which, at times, may have exceeded federally
insured limits. SL Jupiter believes it is not exposed to any
significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents.
Accounts receivable:
Accounts receivable is
comprised of billed but uncollected amounts due for rents,
resident services and other charges. Receivables are recorded at
an estimate of the amounts that will ultimately be collected.
The allowance for doubtful accounts (if any) is based on
specific identification of uncollectible accounts and SL
Jupiters historical collection experience. At
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the allowance for
doubtful accounts was $1,844, $0 and $25,434, respectively.
Property and equipment:
Depreciation of
buildings, related improvements and land improvements is
computed using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives from 15 to 40 years. Depreciation of
furniture, fixtures and equipment is computed using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives from five
to seven years.
Impairment:
Long-lived assets, such as
investment property, and purchased intangibles subject to
amortization are reviewed for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be
held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount
of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected
to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset
exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is
recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the
asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. No impairment charges
were required at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented in the
balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount
or fair value less costs to sell, and would no longer be
depreciated. The assets and liabilities of a disposed group
classified as held for sale would be presented separately in the
appropriate asset and liability sections of the balance sheet.
Revenue recognition:
Rental income is
recognized as earned under tenant leases that typically have
terms of one year or less. Amounts received in advance are
deferred as prepaid rent. Net resident services revenue consists
of ancillary charges to tenants for services related to personal
care and assistance with activities of daily living. Income from
these services is recognized upon completion of the service.
Income taxes:
SL Jupiter is not subject to
federal income tax because its income and losses are includable
in the tax returns of its partners, but may be subject to
certain state taxes. SL Jupiter evaluates tax positions taken or
expected to be taken in the course of preparing the
entitys tax returns
F-68
Senior Lifestyle
Jupiter, L.P.
to determine whether the tax positions are
more-likely-than-not of being sustained when
challenged or when examined by the applicable
taxing authority.
SL Jupiter adopted the provisions of the
Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes
section of the Income Taxes
Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Accounting Standards Codification on
January 1, 2009. For the year ended December 31, 2009,
management has determined that there are no material uncertain
income tax positions.
Tax returns filed by the entity generally are subject to
examination by U.S. and state taxing authorities for years
ended after December 31, 2005.
Deferred and refundable entrance
fees:
Residents of rented units generally enter
into membership contracts whereby the resident pays an entrance
fee. Under most membership agreements, ten to 50 percent of
entrance fees are refundable to the resident in accordance with
SL Jupiters residency agreements.
The remaining amount of the entrance fees is accounted for as
deferred revenue included in the balance of other liabilities,
and 10 to 50 percent is recognized each year, depending on
the agreement, ($467,660, $461,460 and $465,460 in 2009, 2008
and 2007, respectively) as membership fee revenue.
At December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the deferred revenue
and refundable deposits were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred entrance fees
|
|
$
|
359,850
|
|
|
$
|
393,485
|
|
|
$
|
556,820
|
|
Refundable entrance fees
|
|
|
554,120
|
|
|
|
597,770
|
|
|
|
710,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
913,970
|
|
|
$
|
991,255
|
|
|
$
|
1,267,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred entrance fees to be recognized as revenue in the future:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
255,850
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
359,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SL Jupiter does not have any additional obligation to perform
future services related to these membership contracts.
Deferred costs:
Loan fees and costs incurred
in connection with obtaining the mortgage loan have been
capitalized and are being amortized over the term of the loan
using a straight-line method. At December 31, 2009, 2008
and 2007, accumulated amortization totaled $145,703, $53,201 and
$51,353, respectively.
Use of estimates:
In preparing financial
statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP), management makes estimates and
assumptions which affect amounts reported in the financial
statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ
from these estimates and assumptions.
Subsequent events:
SL Jupiter has evaluated
subsequent events for potential recognition
and/or
disclosure through March 22, 2010, the date the financial
statements were available to be issued.
On June 29, 2005, SL Jupiter amended and restated the
existing promissory note and the guaranty which required monthly
payments of interest and, commencing July 10, 2006,
principal payments in the
F-69
Senior Lifestyle
Jupiter, L.P.
amount of $31,871. The loan provided for interest at varying
rates (7.24 percent at December 31, 2007). The loan
was guaranteed by William B. Kaplan and James B. Klutznick (the
Guarantors) for the payment of losses to the lender
for recourse obligations and for the outstanding loan balance to
the extent of breach of certain representations, warranties and
performance.
During 2007, SL Jupiter paid an extension fee of $61,624 and
exercised its option to extend the loan to January 23,
2008. On January 22, 2008, SL Jupiter entered into the
Tenth Extension and Modification Agreement which extended the
loan to March 24, 2008. In March 2008, SL Jupiter entered
into the Eleventh Extension and Modification Agreement which
extended the maturity date of the loan until May 24, 2008.
On June 5, 2008, SL Jupiter refinanced the existing loan
with a new mortgage loan in the principal amount of $33,025,000.
The new mortgage loan requires monthly payments of real estate
tax, replacement reserve escrows and interest only computed on a
variable rate, as defined, through June 1, 2010 at which
time monthly payments of mortgage escrows, principal and
interest are required through June 1, 2013 (maturity date).
SL Jupiter has the option to convert the loan to a fixed
interest rate and modify the terms of the loan, as defined,
provided certain conditions are met. The loan is secured by a
mortgage, a security interest in the cash and escrow accounts
and a collateral assignment of all rents and leases. SL Jupiter
has the option to prepay the loan subject to prepayment
penalties, as defined.
Principal maturities of long-term debt are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
247,828
|
|
2011
|
|
|
517,492
|
|
2012
|
|
|
537,720
|
|
2013
|
|
|
31,721,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
33,025,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 4.
|
RELATED-PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
|
SL Jupiter had the following unsecured amounts due to affiliates
at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Lifestyle Corporation
|
|
$
|
15,375
|
|
|
$
|
8,498
|
|
|
$
|
14,596
|
|
SL Jupiter, LLC
|
|
|
3,145
|
|
|
|
3,145
|
|
|
|
3,145
|
|
Due to others
|
|
|
6,265
|
|
|
|
3,205
|
|
|
|
1,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,785
|
|
|
$
|
14,848
|
|
|
$
|
19,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-70
Senior Lifestyle
Jupiter, L.P.
SL Jupiter had the following unsecured amounts due from
affiliates at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Mangrove Bay Investors, L.L.C.
|
|
$
|
24,650
|
|
|
$
|
150,650
|
|
|
$
|
88,912
|
|
Mangrove Bay Property Owners Association, Inc.
|
|
|
223,649
|
|
|
|
227,292
|
|
|
|
84,305
|
|
Senior Lifestyle Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,400
|
|
SL Jupiter, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
Due from others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
248,299
|
|
|
$
|
387,801
|
|
|
$
|
185,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All affiliates referenced above are related to SL Jupiter
through common ownership and management. Amounts due from
Mangrove Bay Property Owners Association, Inc. will be collected
based on available cash flow. SL Jupiter has agreements with
Senior Lifestyle Management, LLC (SLM), for
management of the facility. SL Jupiter pays a management fee to
SLM equal to five percent of gross rental income. The amount
incurred for management fees was $448,193, $440,536 and $450,698
at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Additionally, Walton SL Jupiter Investors GP IV, L.L.C.
(Walton) entered into a consulting agreement with
SLM for a fee equal to ten percent of the management fees
received by SLM from SL Jupiter in connection with the
management and operation of the community, provided the fees
received exceed four percent of the gross receipts of SL Jupiter.
Any time after December 31, 2006, Mangrove Bay Investors,
LLC or Walton may elect to cause a sale of all the assets of SL
Jupiter to a third party pursuant to certain requirements.
Either Mangrove Bay or Walton, as part of the arrangement, may
purchase the others interest, as defined.
SL Jupiter is subject to quarterly and special assessments from
Mangrove Bay Property Owners Association, Inc. (the Association)
for its allocable share of common area grounds expenses of the
community. During 2009, 2008 and 2007, SL Jupiter was billed
approximately $156,000, $214,000 and $121,000, respectively,
related to these costs.
|
|
NOTE 6.
|
PARTNERSHIP
AGREEMENT
|
On June 25, 2004, SL Jupiter amended and restated its
agreement of limited partnership (Amended Agreement) to provide
for all profit, loss and distributions to be allocated in
proportion to partners ownership interests as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
SL Jupiter, LLC (General Partner)
|
|
|
0.188%
|
|
Mangrove Bay Investors, L.L.C. (Limited Partner)
(Mangrove)
|
|
|
43.676%
|
|
Senior Lifestyle Contribution Company, L.L.C. (Limited Partner)
(SLCC)
|
|
|
6.230%
|
|
Walton SL Jupiter Investors IV, L.L.C. (Limited Partner)
(Walton)
|
|
|
49.906%
|
|
The Amended Agreement provides for a 20 percent return,
compounded monthly, on all capital contributions and partner
loans made by Walton. All amounts owed to affiliates of SL
Jupiter at June 1, 2004 are subordinate to this return.
This return was distributed to Walton in its entirety in 2008.
F-71
Senior Lifestyle
Jupiter, L.P.
Effective January 1, 2006, the partners executed an
amendment to the Amended Agreement that provides for allocations
as follows:
a. Profits are generally allocated to the extent of
losses and distributions previously allocated; the remainder in
proportion to SL Jupiter ownership percentages.
b. Losses are allocated to the extent of profits
previously allocated; the remainder in proportion to SL Jupiter
ownership percentages.
c. Distributions are allocated to the partners in
accordance with the terms of Amended Agreement and provide for
preferential returns based on the performance of SL Jupiter (as
defined). In July 2006, SLCC assigned some of its preferential
returns to Senior Lifestyle
CI-II,
LLC
(SLCI), an affiliate. Distributions are allocated as follows:
(i) To all partners pro rata until Walton has
received a 20 percent return (as defined).
(ii) To SLCI and Walton, at 9.98 and
39.92 percent of the distributable cash, respectively, the
remainder to General Partner, Mangrove, SLCC based on ownership
percentages until Walton receives a 25 percent return (as
defined).
(iii) To SLCI and Walton, at 12.47 and
37.43 percent of the distributable cash, respectively, the
remainder to General Partner, Mangrove, SLCC based on ownership
percentages until Walton receives a 30 percent return (as
defined).
(iv) To SLCI and Walton, at 14.97 and
34.93 percent of the distributable cash, respectively, the
remainder to General Partner, Mangrove, SLCC based on ownership
percentages.
SL Jupiter is subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise
in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of
management, the amount of any ultimate liability with respect to
these actions will not materially affect SL Jupiters
financial statements.
F-72
Appendix APrior
performance tables
The information that follows, including the tables set forth on
subsequent pages, is based on information contained in the
filings CNL Retirement, CNL Hotels and CNL Income Properties
made with the SEC. The information regarding the historical
investment performance of CNL Retirement, CNL Hotels and CNL
Income Properties is not a guarantee or prediction of the
returns that we may achieve in the future. We can offer no
assurance that we will replicate the historical performance of
CNL Retirement, CNL Hotels or CNL Income Properties. CNL
Financial Group, Inc. and its affiliates are not sponsors of and
have no affiliation with our company, have not participated in
the preparation of this prospectus and are not endorsing our
company or an investment in our common stock. For additional
information regarding the prior performance of CNL Retirement,
CNL Hotels and CNL Income Properties, please refer to the
narrative prior performance summary contained in the prospectus
under the heading Prior Performance Summary.
The following table presents the operating results for CNL
Retirement for the periods shown as well as tax and distribution
data for these same periods that would have been applicable to a
$1,000 investment in CNL Retirements common stock. We have
included operating data only for the 2004 and 2005 fiscal years
because Mr. Hutchison served as Chief Executive Officer
during these two years. Mr. Hutchison was appointed as
Chief Executive Officer of CNL Retirement in August 2003 and
resigned as Chief Executive Officer of CNL Retirement in
September 2005. We believe that the investment objectives of CNL
Retirement were similar to our investment objectives, primarily
because CNL Retirement invested in the same types of properties
that we intend to acquire, although CNL Retirements common
stock was not listed on a national securities exchange and did
not trade whereas we expect our common stock to trade on the
NYSE.
Operating Results
of CNL Retirement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(note
5)
|
|
|
(note
2)
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenue
|
|
$
|
259,818,000
|
|
|
$
|
381,074,000
|
|
Profit (Loss) on sale of properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
4,771,000
|
|
|
|
2,970,000
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entity
|
|
|
178,000
|
|
|
|
227,000
|
|
Less: Operating expenses
|
|
|
(39,964,000
|
)
|
|
|
(66,335,000
|
)
|
Interest and loan cost amortization expense
|
|
|
(42,783,000
|
)
|
|
|
(76,171,000
|
)
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(3,900,000
|
)
|
|
|
(3,082,000
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(62,512,000
|
)
|
|
|
(98,446,000
|
)
|
Minority interests in income of consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(93,000
|
)
|
|
|
(706,000
|
)
|
Income (Loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
2,403,000
|
|
|
|
(3,950,000
|
)
|
Net incomeGAAP basis
|
|
|
117,918,000
|
|
|
|
135,581,000
|
|
Taxable income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- from operations (Note 6)
|
|
|
56,155,000
|
|
|
|
81,871,000
|
|
- from gain on sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash generated from operations (Notes 3 and 4)
|
|
|
139,573,000
|
|
|
|
188,309,000
|
|
Cash generated from sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash generated from refinancing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Cash distributions to investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- from operating cash flow
|
|
|
(139,573,000
|
)
|
|
|
(175,958,000
|
)
|
- from cash flow from prior period
|
|
|
(4,842,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
- from return of capital (Note 7)
|
|
|
(2,723,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash generated (deficiency) after cash distributions
|
|
|
(7,565,000
|
)
|
|
|
12,351,000
|
|
A-1
Appendix APrior
performance tables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(note
5)
|
|
|
(note
2)
|
|
|
|
|
Special items (not including sales of real estate and
refinancing):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscriptions received from stockholders
|
|
|
880,268,000
|
|
|
|
215,397,000
|
|
Stock issuance costs
|
|
|
(89,039,000
|
)
|
|
|
(17,254,000
|
)
|
Acquisition of land, building and equipment on operating leases
|
|
|
(921,698,000
|
)
|
|
|
(371,026,000
|
)
|
Investment in direct financing leases
|
|
|
(50,230,000
|
)
|
|
|
(278,000
|
)
|
Investment in lease intangibles
|
|
|
(50,064,000
|
)
|
|
|
(15,044,000
|
)
|
DASCO acquisition
|
|
|
(204,441,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,000,000
|
)
|
Contributions from minority interests
|
|
|
997,000
|
|
|
|
3,093,000
|
|
Distributions to minority interests
|
|
|
(45,000
|
)
|
|
|
(459,000
|
)
|
Payment of acquisition fees and costs
|
|
|
(73,124,000
|
)
|
|
|
(20,575,000
|
)
|
Payment of deferred leasing costs
|
|
|
(864,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,039,000
|
)
|
Increase (Decrease) in restricted cash
|
|
|
(9,448,000
|
)
|
|
|
6,082,000
|
|
Proceeds from borrowings on line of credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,000,000
|
|
Repayments of line of credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60,000,000
|
)
|
Proceeds from borrowings on mortgages payable
|
|
|
315,045,000
|
|
|
|
305,485,000
|
|
Principal payments on mortgages payable
|
|
|
(28,964,000
|
)
|
|
|
(66,219,000
|
)
|
Proceeds from construction loans payable
|
|
|
73,618,000
|
|
|
|
63,367,000
|
|
Repayments of construction loans payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,315,000
|
)
|
Proceeds from term loan
|
|
|
60,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of term loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60,000,000
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of bonds payable
|
|
|
12,063,000
|
|
|
|
12,622,000
|
|
Retirement of bonds payable
|
|
|
(7,736,000
|
)
|
|
|
(9,057,000
|
)
|
Payment of loan costs
|
|
|
(10,149,000
|
)
|
|
|
(11,707,000
|
)
|
Refund of loan costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement of shares of common stock
|
|
|
(3,933,000
|
)
|
|
|
(40,303,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash generated (deficiency) after cash distributions and special
items
|
|
$
|
(115,309,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
43,121,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TAX AND DISTRIBUTION DATA PER $1,000 INVESTED (Note 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal income tax results:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary income (Note 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- from operations (Note 6)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- from recapture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions to investors Source (on GAAP basis)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- from investment income
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
- from return of capital (Note 7)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions on GAAP basis (Note 8)
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source (on cash basis)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- from operations (Note 3)
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
- from cash flow from prior period
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
- from return of capital (Note 7)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions on cash basis (Note 8)
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-2
Appendix APrior
performance tables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(note
5)
|
|
|
(note
2)
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash distributions as a percentage of original $1,000
investment (Note 5)
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
Total cumulative cash distributions per $1,000 investment from
inception (December 22, 1997)
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
Amount (in percentage terms) remaining invested in program
properties at the end of each year presented (original total
acquisition cost of properties retained, divided by original
total acquisition cost of all properties in program)
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
CNL Retirement offered securities for sale in five public
offerings from 1998 to 2006.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The amounts shown represent the combined results of the
initial offering, the 2000 offering, the 2002 offering, the 2003
offering and the 2004 offering.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Cash generated from operations includes cash received from
tenants, interest and other income, less cash paid for operating
expenses.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Cash generated from operations per this table agrees to cash
generated from operations per the statement of cash flows
included in the consolidated financial statements of the CNL
Retirement.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Total cash distributions as a percentage of original $1,000
investment are calculated based on actual distributions declared
for the period.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Taxable income presented is before the dividends paid
deduction.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Cash distributions presented above as a return of capital on
a GAAP basis represent the amount of cash distributions in
excess of accumulated net income on a GAAP basis. Accumulated
net income includes deductions for depreciation and amortization
expense and income from certain non-cash items. In addition,
cash distributions presented as a return of capital on a cash
basis represents the amount of cash distributions in excess of
cash generated from operating cash flow and excess cash flows
from prior periods. These amounts have not been treated as a
return of capital for purposes of calculating the amount of
stockholders invested capital.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Tax and distribution data and total distributions on GAAP
basis were computed based on the weighted average shares
outstanding during each period presented.
|
Source: CNL Retirement SEC filings.
A-3
Appendix APrior
performance tables
The following table presents the operating results for CNL
Hotels for the periods shown as well as tax and distribution
data for these same periods that would have been applicable to a
$1,000 investment in CNL Hotels common stock. We have
included data for the 2004, 2005 and 2006 fiscal years because
Mr. Hutchison served as Chief Executive Officer of CNL
Hotels during these periods. We believe that the investment
objectives of CNL Hotels were not similar to our investment
objectives, primarily because (i) CNL Hotels invested in a
different type of property than we intend to acquire and
(ii) the common stock of CNL Hotels was unlisted and did
not trade in an active secondary market. CNL Hotels raised
equity capital through a series of continuous offerings of its
common stock at a fixed price of $10.00, regardless of any
increases or decreases in earnings or in the net asset value of
the companys properties. Accordingly, appreciation in the
market value of the companys common stock was not a
component of the returns that the company generated for
investors, other than in connection with the ultimate sale of
the company. In contrast, our common stock will be listed on the
NYSE and we expect that the returns we generate for our
stockholders will be impacted by fluctuations in the market
price of our common stock.
Operating Results
of CNL Hotels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(notes 1 and
2)
|
|
|
(notes 1 and
2)
|
|
|
(notes 1 and
2)
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenue
|
|
$
|
943,945,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,216,789,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,540,528,000
|
|
Profit on sale of properties
|
|
|
645,000
|
|
|
|
67,321,000
|
|
|
|
153,523,000
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
2,512,000
|
|
|
|
4,077,000
|
|
|
|
4,234,000
|
|
Less: Operating expenses
|
|
|
(733,534,000
|
)
|
|
|
(968,458,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,172,484,000
|
)
|
Interest expense and loan cost amortization
|
|
|
(140,876,000
|
)
|
|
|
(180,369,000
|
)
|
|
|
(220,632,000
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(126,689,000
|
)
|
|
|
(162,926,000
|
)
|
|
|
(204,642,000
|
)
|
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
(18,469,000
|
)
|
|
|
32,775,000
|
|
|
|
6,600,000
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(2,978,000
|
)
|
|
|
(5,190,000
|
)
|
|
|
(6,361,000
|
)
|
Benefit (Expense) from income taxes
|
|
|
(27,429,000
|
)
|
|
|
2,979,000
|
|
|
|
(621,000
|
)
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
33,654,000
|
|
|
|
8,689,000
|
|
|
|
10,980,000
|
|
Net income (loss)GAAP basis
|
|
|
(87,113,000
|
)
|
|
|
6,900,000
|
|
|
|
(3,335,000
|
)
|
Taxable income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- from operations (Note 6)
|
|
|
1,144,668
|
|
|
|
31,821,000
|
|
|
|
27,669,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- from gain (loss) on sales
|
|
|
9,882,974
|
|
|
|
93,936,000
|
|
|
|
161,414,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash generated from operations (Notes 3 and 4)
|
|
|
213,741,000
|
|
|
|
169,813,000
|
|
|
|
213,578,000
|
|
Cash generated from sales
|
|
|
16,810,000
|
|
|
|
595,300,000
|
|
|
|
229,193,000
|
|
Cash generated from refinancing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Cash distributions to investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- from operating cash flow
|
|
|
(213,741,000
|
)
|
|
|
(168,132,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
- from sale of properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(154,704,000
|
)
|
- from return of capital (Note 7)
|
|
|
(4,602,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash generated (deficiency) after cash distributions
|
|
|
12,208,000
|
|
|
|
596,981,000
|
|
|
|
288,067,000
|
|
Special items (not including sales of real estate and
refinancing):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscriptions received from stockholders
|
|
|
658,578,000
|
|
|
|
43,481,000
|
|
|
|
37,745,000
|
|
Proceeds from mortgage loans and other notes payable
|
|
|
1,922,508,000
|
|
|
|
400,000,000
|
|
|
|
2,215,000,000
|
|
A-4
Appendix APrior
performance tables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(notes 1 and
2)
|
|
|
(notes 1 and
2)
|
|
|
(notes 1 and
2)
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to holders of minority interest, net of
contributions
|
|
|
(13,213,000
|
)
|
|
|
(33,418,000
|
)
|
|
|
(5,935,000
|
)
|
Stock issuance costs (refunds)
|
|
|
(59,430,000
|
)
|
|
|
2,497,000
|
|
|
|
(1,185,000
|
)
|
Acquisition of land, buildings and equipment
|
|
|
(118,213,000
|
)
|
|
|
(108,559,000
|
)
|
|
|
(159,669,000
|
)
|
Acquisition of KSL in 2004 and Grande Lakes in 2005 and 2006
|
|
|
(1,426,309,000
|
)
|
|
|
(15,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
(735,613,000
|
)
|
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries and acquisition of JV
interests
|
|
|
(2,192,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,580,000
|
)
|
Deposit on property and other investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,725,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution from unconsolidated entity related to sales proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,529,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of investment in equity securities
|
|
|
28,295,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (Increase) in restricted cash
|
|
|
(37,778,000
|
)
|
|
|
8,062,000
|
|
|
|
29,940,000
|
|
Proceeds of borrowing on line of credit
|
|
|
(24,073,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,000,000
|
|
Payment on mortgage loans and line of credit
|
|
|
(802,812,000
|
)
|
|
|
(903,980,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,617,154,000
|
)
|
Proceeds (Payment) of other notes
|
|
|
(63,593,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,892,000
|
|
Payment of loan costs
|
|
|
(43,979,000
|
)
|
|
|
(8,004,000
|
)
|
|
|
(15,516,000
|
)
|
Payment of capital lease obligation
|
|
|
(1,823,000
|
)
|
|
|
(772,000
|
)
|
|
|
(805,000
|
)
|
Proceeds (Payment) to sell (acquire) cash flow hedges
|
|
|
(4,899,000
|
)
|
|
|
(3,020,000
|
)
|
|
|
1,005,000
|
|
Increase in intangibles and other assets
|
|
|
(37,655,000
|
)
|
|
|
(400,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement of shares of common stock
|
|
|
(24,636,000
|
)
|
|
|
(43,336,000
|
)
|
|
|
(31,745,000
|
)
|
Payment of due to related partiesoperating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,998,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash generated (deficiency) after cash distributions and special
items
|
|
|
(39,016,000
|
)
|
|
|
(19,664,000
|
)
|
|
|
33,449,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TAX AND DISTRIBUTION DATA PER $1,000 INVESTED (Note 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal income tax results:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary income (loss) (Note 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- from operations (Note 6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- from recapture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital gain (loss)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions to Investors
Source (on GAAP basis)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- from investment income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
- from return of capital (Note 7)
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions on GAAP basis (Note 8)
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source (on cash basis)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- from sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
- from operations
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
- from return of capital (Note 7)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-5
Appendix APrior
performance tables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(notes 1 and
2)
|
|
|
(notes 1 and
2)
|
|
|
(notes 1 and
2)
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions on cash basis (Note 8)
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash distributions as a percentage of original $1,000
investment (Note 5)
|
|
|
7.45
|
%
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
Total cumulative cash distributions per $1,000 investment from
inception (June 12, 1996)
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
Amount (in percentage terms) remaining invested in program
properties at the end of each year (period) presented (original
total acquisition cost of properties retained, divided by
original total acquisition cost of all properties in program)
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
CNL Hotels offered securities for sale in five public
offerings since 1997. Of the funds raised as of
December 31, 2006, $74,307,514 were pursuant to its
reinvestment plan.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The amounts shown represent the combined results of the
initial offering, the 1999 offering, the 2000 offering, 2002
offering and the 2003 offering. All years presented have been
rounded to thousands and reflect the reverse stock split which
occurred on August 2, 2004.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Cash generated from operations includes cash received from
hotel operations and dividend, interest and other income, less
cash paid for operating expenses.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Cash generated from operations per this table agrees to cash
generated from operations per the statement of cash flows
included in the consolidated financial statements of the CNL
Hotels.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Total cash distributions as a percentage of original $1,000
investment are calculated based on actual distributions declared
for the period.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Taxable income presented is before the dividends paid
deduction.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Cash distributions presented above as a return of capital on
a GAAP basis represent the amount of cash distributions in
excess of accumulated net income on a GAAP basis. Accumulated
net income includes deductions for depreciation and amortization
expense and income from certain non-cash items. In addition,
cash distributions presented as a return of capital on a cash
basis represents the amount of cash distributions in excess of
cash generated from operating cash flow and excess cash flows
from prior periods. These amounts have not been treated as a
return of capital for purposes of calculating the amount of
stockholders invested capital.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Tax and distribution data and total distributions on a GAAP
basis were computed based on the weighted average shares
outstanding during each period presented.
|
Source: CNL Hotels SEC filings.
A-6
Appendix APrior
performance tables
The following table presents information regarding the amount of
capital raised by CNL Hotels from its inception until the
offering of its common stock was completed, the number of
properties acquired with that capital, the dates of the first
property sale and the final property sale by CNL Hotels, tax and
distribution data relating to a $1,000 investment in the common
stock of CNL Hotels and information regarding the cash flow of
CNL Hotels and distributions that were made to investors in CNL
Hotels.
Results of
Completed Program CNL Hotels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CNL Hotels
|
|
Program
Name
|
|
(note
2)
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar Amount Raised
|
|
$
|
3,066,534,832
|
|
Number of Properties Purchased, Directly or Indirectly
|
|
|
137
|
|
Date of Closing of Offering
|
|
|
03/12/2004
|
|
Date of First Sale of Property
|
|
|
07/10/2003
|
|
Date of Final Sale of Property
|
|
|
04/12/2007
|
|
Tax and Distribution Data per $1000 investment (Note 1)
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Income Tax Results:
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary Income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
- from operations
|
|
|
197
|
|
- from recapture
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Gain (loss)
|
|
|
87
|
|
Deferred Gain
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Distributions to Investors
|
|
|
|
|
Source (on GAAP basis)
|
|
|
|
|
- Investment Income
|
|
|
194
|
|
- Capital Gain
|
|
|
50
|
|
- Return of Capital
|
|
|
355
|
|
Source (on cash basis)
|
|
|
|
|
- Sales
|
|
|
|
|
- Refinancing
|
|
|
|
|
- Operations
|
|
|
586
|
|
- Cash flow from prior period
|
|
|
|
|
- Return of Capital
|
|
|
13
|
|
Receivable on Net Purchase Money Financing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Through December 31, 2006.
|
|
(2)
|
|
On April 12, 2007, CNL Hotels merged with and into a
wholly owned subsidiary of MS Resort Holdings, LLC at which
time, for every $1,000 investment, every investor of CNL Hotels
received total cash of $1,025.
|
Source: CNL Hotels SEC filings.
A-7
Appendix APrior
performance tables
The following table presents the operating results for CNL
Income Properties for the periods shown as well as tax and
distribution data for these same periods that would have been
applicable to a $1,000 investment in CNL Income Properties
common stock. We have included operating data only for the 2004
and 2005 fiscal years because Mr. Hutchison served as Chief
Executive Officer only during these two fiscal years.
Mr. Hutchison was appointed as Chief Executive Officer of
CNL Income Properties in August 2003 and resigned as Chief
Executive Officer of CNL Income Properties in August 2005. CNL
Income Properties commenced raising capital in April 2004. We
believe that the investment objectives of CNL Income Properties
were not similar to our investment objectives, primarily because
(i) CNL Income Properties invested in property types that
are different than the types of properties that we intend to
acquire and (ii) the common stock of CNL Income Properties
is unlisted and does not trade in an active secondary market.
CNL Income Properties raises its equity capital through the
continuous offering of its common stock at a fixed price of
$10.00, regardless of any increases or decreases in earnings or
in the net asset value of the companys properties.
Accordingly, appreciation in the market value of the
companys common stock has not been a component of the
returns that the company has generated for investors. In
contrast, our common stock will be listed on the NYSE and we
expect that the returns we generate for our stockholders will be
impacted by fluctuations in the market price of our common stock.
Operating Results
CNL Income Properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenue
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
227,000
|
|
Profit (Loss) on sale of properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
378,741
|
|
|
|
1,346,000
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
218,466
|
|
|
|
10,290,000
|
|
Less: Operating expenses
|
|
|
(1,280,470
|
)
|
|
|
(5,174,000
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,000
|
)
|
Interest expense and loan cost amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69,000
|
)
|
Income (Loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income GAAP basis
|
|
|
(683,263
|
)
|
|
|
6,583,000
|
|
Taxable income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from gain (loss) on sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash generated from operations
|
|
|
754,656
|
|
|
|
4,616,000
|
|
Cash generated from sales and refinancing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Cash distributions to investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from operating cash flow
|
|
|
(1,172,688
|
)
|
|
|
(10,096,000
|
)
|
from sales and refinancings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from cash flow from prior period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash generated (deficiency) after cash distributions
|
|
|
(418,032
|
)
|
|
|
(5,480,000
|
)
|
A-8
Appendix APrior
performance tables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Special items (not including sales of real estate and
refinancing):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,104,000
|
)
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
(40,068,625
|
)
|
|
|
(158,791,000
|
)
|
Distribution of loan proceeds from unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
480,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposit on properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000,000
|
)
|
Acquisition fees and costs paid
|
|
|
(1,711,874
|
)
|
|
|
(16,168,000
|
)
|
Proceeds from disposal of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of mortgage loans receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of additional carrying costs for mortgage loans
receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of mortgage loans receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,000,000
|
)
|
Short term investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscriptions received from stockholders
|
|
|
87,369,784
|
|
|
|
291,173,000
|
|
Redemption of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(229,000
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate fluctuation on cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from mortgage loans and other notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issuance costs
|
|
|
(8,943,081
|
)
|
|
|
(33,771,000
|
)
|
Principal payment on capital lease obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payment on mortgage loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings (repayments) on line of credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,503,000
|
|
Payment of loan costs and deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,000
|
)
|
Cash generated (deficiency) after cash distributions and special
items
|
|
$
|
36,709,117
|
|
|
$
|
57,095,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-9
Appendix APrior
performance tables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(note
1)
|
|
|
(note
1)
|
|
|
|
|
TAX AND DISTRIBUTION DATA PER $1,000 INVESTED (Note 4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal income tax results:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- from operations (Note 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
- from recapture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital gain (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash distribution to investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source (on GAAP basis)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- from investment income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
- from return of capital (Note 3)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Total distributions on GAAP basis (Note 6)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Source (on cash basis)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- from sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- from refinancing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- from operations (Note 2)
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
- from other
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Total distributions on cash basis (Note 6)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Total cash distributions as a percentage of original $1,000
investment (Note 4)
|
|
|
2.59%
|
|
|
|
5.35
|
%
|
Total cumulative cash distributions per $1,000 investment from
inception
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Amount (in percentage terms) remaining invested in program
properties at the end of each year (period) presented (original
total acquisition cost of properties retained, dividend by
original total acquisition cost of all properties in program)
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
CNL Lifestyle Properties first offering commenced on
April 16, 2004 and was terminated on March 31,
2006.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Cash generated from operations includes rental income from
operating leases and interest income on mortgages and other
notes receivables less cash paid for operating expenses. The
amounts shown agree to cash generated from operations per the
statement of cash flows included in the consolidated financial
statements of CNL Lifestyle Properties.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Cash distributions presented above represents the amount of
cash distributions in excess of cash generated from operating
cash flow. Cash generated from operations includes net income on
a GAAP basis less depreciation and amortization expenses,
operating expenses and income from certain non-cash items.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Total cash distributions as a percentage of original $1,000
investment are calculated based on actual distributions declared
for the period.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Taxable income presented is before the dividends paid
deduction.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Tax and distribution data and total distributions on a GAAP
basis were computed based on the actual distributions declared
and paid and weighted average shares outstanding during each
period presented.
|
The information presented above regarding CNL Retirement,
CNL Hotels and CNL Income Properties and their prior
performance is based entirely on information contained in the
SEC filings of these entities which are publicly available
through the SECs website at www.sec.gov. KPMG, LLP, our
independent registered public accounting firm, has not
independently verified the accuracy of the information contained
in the SEC filings of these entities.
A-10
8,750,000
Shares of Common Stock
and
Up
to 8,750,000 Contingent Warrants
and
Up
to 8,750,000 Shares of Common Stock
Issuable Upon Exercise of the
Contingent Warrants
Prospectus
Jefferies
& Company
Stifel
Nicolaus Weisel
Morgan
Keegan & Company, Inc.
,
2010
Part II.
Information not required in prospectus
ITEM 31.
OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION.
The following table sets forth the costs and expenses of the
sale and distribution of the securities being registered, all of
which are being borne by the Registrant.
|
|
|
|
|
SEC registration fee
|
|
$
|
27,264
|
|
FINRA filing fee
|
|
|
38,738
|
|
NYSE fees
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
Printing and engraving fees
|
|
|
430,000
|
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
|
1,550,000
|
|
Accounting fees and expenses
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
Blue Sky fees and expenses (including legal fees)
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Miscellaneous expenses
|
|
|
118,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All expenses, except the SEC registration fee and FINRA filing
fee, are estimated.
ITEM 32.
SALES TO SPECIAL PARTIES.
None.
ITEM 33.
RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES.
We have issued or agreed to issue the following securities that
were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(the Securities Act):
On April 16, 2010, we issued 1,000 shares of common
stock to Mr. Hutchison in connection with the formation and
initial capitalization of our company for an aggregate purchase
price of $1,000. We will redeem these shares from
Mr. Hutchison for $1,000 upon completion of this offering.
These shares were issued in reliance on the exemption set forth
in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.
We will sell an aggregate of 324,324 shares of common stock
to Messrs. Hutchison, Anderson and Patten in a private
placement concurrently with the closing of the offering at a
price per share equal to the public offering price in the
offering. These shares will be sold in reliance on the exemption
set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and
Rule 506 of Regulation D thereunder. Each of the
investors in the concurrent private placement will represent to
us that he is an accredited investor as defined in
Rule 501 under the Securities Act.
ITEM 34.
INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS.
The Maryland General Corporation Law (MGCL) permits
a Maryland corporation to include in its charter a provision
limiting the liability of its directors and officers to the
corporation and its stockholders for money damages, except for
liability resulting from (1) actual receipt of an improper
benefit or profit in money, property or services or
(2) active and deliberate dishonesty that is established by
a final judgment and is material to the cause of action. Our
charter contains a provision that eliminates such liability to
the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law.
The MGCL requires a corporation (unless its charter provides
otherwise, which our charter does not) to indemnify a director
or officer who has been successful, on the merits or otherwise,
in the defense of any proceeding to which he or she is made, or
threatened to be made, a party by reason of his or her service
in that capacity. The MGCL permits a corporation to indemnify
its present and former directors and officers, among others,
against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable
expenses
II-1
Part II.
Information not required in prospectus
actually incurred by them in connection with any proceeding to
which they may be made, or threatened to be made, a party by
reason of their service in those or other capacities unless it
is established that:
|
|
Ø
|
the act or omission of the director or officer was material to
the matter giving rise to the proceeding and (1) was
committed in bad faith or (2) was the result of active and
deliberate dishonesty;
|
|
Ø
|
the director or officer actually received an improper personal
benefit in money, property or services; or
|
|
Ø
|
in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer
had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was
unlawful.
|
However, under the MGCL, a Maryland corporation may not
indemnify for an adverse judgment in a suit by or in the right
of the corporation or for a judgment of liability on the basis
that personal benefit was improperly received, unless in either
case a court orders indemnification if it determines that the
director or officer is fairly and reasonably entitled to
indemnification, and then only for expenses. In addition, the
MGCL permits a Maryland corporation to advance reasonable
expenses to a director or officer upon its receipt of:
|
|
Ø
|
a written affirmation by the director or officer of his or her
good faith belief that he or she has met the standard of conduct
necessary for indemnification by the corporation; and
|
|
Ø
|
a written undertaking by the director or officer or on the
directors or officers behalf to repay the amount
paid or reimbursed by the corporation if it is ultimately
determined that the director or officer did not meet the
standard of conduct.
|
Our charter authorizes us and our bylaws obligate us, to the
maximum extent permitted by Maryland law in effect from time to
time, to indemnify and, without requiring a preliminary
determination of the ultimate entitlement to indemnification,
pay or reimburse reasonable expenses in advance of final
disposition of such a proceeding to:
|
|
Ø
|
any present or former director or officer of our company who is
made, or threatened to be made, a party to the proceeding by
reason of his or her service in that capacity; or
|
|
Ø
|
any individual who, while a director or officer of our company
and at our request, serves or has served as a director, officer,
partner, trustee, member or manager of another corporation, real
estate investment trust, limited liability company, partnership,
joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise
and who is made, or threatened to be made, a party to the
proceeding by reason of his or her service in that capacity.
|
Our charter and bylaws also permit us to indemnify and advance
expenses to any individual who served our predecessor in any of
the capacities described above and to any employee or agent of
our company or our predecessor.
Upon completion of this offering, we intend to enter into
indemnification agreements with each of our directors and
executive officers that would provide for indemnification and
advance of expenses to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland
law.
Insofar as the foregoing provisions permit indemnification of
directors, officers or persons controlling us for liability
arising under the Securities Act, we have been informed that in
the opinion of the SEC, this indemnification is against public
policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore
unenforceable.
ITEM 35.
TREATMENT OF PROCEEDS FROM STOCK BEING REGISTERED.
None of the net proceeds will be credited to an account other
than the appropriate capital stock account.
II-2
Part II.
Information not required in prospectus
ITEM 36.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.
(a) Financial Statements. See
page F-1
for an index of the financial statements included in the
Registration Statement.
(b) Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed as
part of, or incorporated by reference into, this registration
statement on
Form S-11:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit
Description
|
|
|
|
1
|
.1
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Form of Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Legacy
Healthcare Properties Trust Inc.
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Form of Bylaws of Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust Inc.
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen common stock certificate
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Form of Warrant Agreement, including the Contingent Warrant
Issuance Form
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Form of Warrant Certificate
|
|
5
|
.1
|
|
Opinion of Venable LLP superseded by Exhibit 5.2
|
|
5
|
.2
|
|
Opinion of Venable LLP
|
|
5
|
.3
|
|
Opinion of Hunton & Williams LLP
|
|
8
|
.1
|
|
Tax opinion of Hunton & Williams LLP
superseded by Exhibit 8.2
|
|
8
|
.2
|
|
Tax opinion of Hunton & Williams LLP
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Form of Agreement of Limited Partnership of Legacy Healthcare
Properties, LP
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated April 27, 2010,
by and among WSL Holdings, IV, L.L.C., Walton Acquisition
Holdings IV, L.P., SL Jupiter Holdings, L.L.C., Mangrove
Bay Investors, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle Contribution Company,
L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle
CI-CII,
L.L.C., as sellers, and Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust Inc.,
as purchaser
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Form of Subscription Agreement
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Form of Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust Inc. 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan superseded by Exhibit 10.16
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Form of Stock Award Agreement
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement to be entered into by Legacy
Healthcare Properties Trust Inc. with each of its executive
officers, directors and director nominees
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and Thomas J.
Hutchison III superseded by Exhibit 10.17
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and Phillip M. Anderson, Jr.
superseded by Exhibit 10.18
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and Mark E. Patten superseded
by Exhibit 10.19
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and James R. Hendrix
superseded by Exhibit 10.20
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and John W. Krueger superseded
by Exhibit 10.21
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
First Amendment to Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated
May 27, 2010, by and among WSL Holdings, IV, L.L.C.,
Walton Acquisition Holdings IV, L.P., SL Jupiter Holdings,
L.L.C., Mangrove Bay Investors, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle
Contribution Company, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle
CI-II,
L.L.C., as sellers, and Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust Inc.,
as purchaser, and joined in by Walton Street Real Estate
Fund IV, L.P., Senior Lifestyle Corporation and Senior
Lifestyle Management, L.L.C., as guarantors, and Legacy
Healthcare Advisors, LLC, as an indemnifying party
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Second Amendment to Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated
June 2, 2010, by and among WSL Holdings, IV, L.L.C.,
Walton Acquisition Holdings IV, L.P., SL Jupiter Holdings,
L.L.C., Mangrove Bay Investors, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle
Contribution Company, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle CI-II, L.L.C., as
sellers, and Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust Inc., as
purchaser, and joined in by Legacy Healthcare Advisors, LLC, as
an indemnifying party, and Walton Street Real Estate
Fund IV, L.P. and Senior Lifestyle Management, LLC, as
guarantors
|
II-3
Part II.
Information not required in prospectus
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit
Description
|
|
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Third Amendment to Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated
July 9, 2010, by and among WSL Holdings, IV, L.L.C., Walton
Acquisition Holdings IV, L.P., SL Jupiter Holdings, L.L.C.,
Mangrove Bay Investors, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle Contribution
Company, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle CI-II, L.L.C., as sellers, and
Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust, Inc., as purchaser, and
joined in by Legacy Healthcare Advisors LLC, as an indemnifying
party, and Walton Street Real Estate Fund IV, L.P. and
Senior Lifestyle Management, LLC, as guarantors
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated
July 29, 2010, by and among WSL Holdings, IV, L.L.C.,
Walton Acquisition Holdings IV, L.P., SL Jupiter Holdings,
L.L.C., Mangrove Bay Investors, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle
Contribution Company, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle
CI-II,
L.L.C., as sellers, and Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust,
Inc., as purchaser, and joined in by Legacy Healthcare Advisors
LLC, as an indemnifying party, and Walton Street Real Estate
Fund IV, L.P. and Senior Lifestyle Management, LLC, as
guarantors
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Form of Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust Inc. 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and Thomas J.
Hutchison III superseded by Exhibit 10.22
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and Phillip M.
Anderson, Jr. superseded by Exhibit 10.23
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and Mark E. Patten
superseded by Exhibit 10.24
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and James R. Hendrix
superseded by Exhibit 10.25
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and John W. Krueger
superseded by Exhibit 10.26
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and Thomas J. Hutchison III
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and Phillip M. Anderson, Jr.
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and Mark E. Patten
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and James R. Hendrix
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and John W. Krueger
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated
August 26, 2010, by and among WSL Holdings, IV, L.L.C.,
Walton Acquisition Holdings IV, L.P., SL Jupiter Holdings,
L.L.C., Mangrove Bay Investors, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle
Contribution Company, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle CI-II, L.L.C., as
sellers, and Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust, Inc., as
purchaser, and joined in by Legacy Healthcare Advisors LLC, as
an indemnifying party, and Walton Street Real Estate
Fund IV, L.P. and Senior Lifestyle Management, LLC, as
guarantors
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
Sixth Amendment to Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated
September 12, 2010, by and among WSL Holdings, IV, L.L.C.,
Walton Acquisition Holdings IV, L.P., SL Jupiter Holdings,
L.L.C., Mangrove Bay Investors, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle
Contribution Company, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle CI-II, L.L.C., as
sellers, and Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust, Inc., as
purchaser, and joined in by Legacy Healthcare Advisors LLC, as
an indemnifying party, and Walton Street Real Estate
Fund IV, L.P. and Senior Lifestyle Management, LLC, as
guarantors
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
Seventh Amendment to Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated
September 30, 2010, by and among WSL Holdings, IV, L.L.C.,
Walton Acquisition Holdings IV, L.P., SL Jupiter Holdings,
L.L.C., Mangrove Bay Investors, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle
Contribution Company, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle CI-II, L.L.C., as
sellers, and Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust, Inc., as
purchaser, and joined in by Legacy Healthcare Advisors LLC, as
an indemnifying party, and Walton Street Real Estate
Fund IV, L.P. and Senior Lifestyle Management, LLC, as
guarantors
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
List of Subsidiaries of Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust Inc.
|
II-4
Part II.
Information not required in prospectus
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit
Description
|
|
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP
|
|
23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
|
|
23
|
.3
|
|
Consent of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
|
|
23
|
.4
|
|
Consent of Venable LLP (included in Exhibit 5.2)
|
|
23
|
.5
|
|
Consent of Hunton & Williams LLP (included in
Exhibit 5.3 and Exhibit 8.2)
|
|
23
|
.6
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP
|
|
99
|
.1
|
|
Consent of James W. Duncan, Jr. to being named as a director
|
|
99
|
.2
|
|
Consent of Joseph E. Gibbs to being named as a director
|
|
99
|
.3
|
|
Consent of Dianna F. Morgan to being named as a director
|
|
99
|
.4
|
|
Consent of Robert E. Parsons, Jr. to being named as a
director
|
|
99
|
.5
|
|
Consent of David M. Thomas to being named as a director
|
ITEM 37.
UNDERTAKINGS.
(a) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to
provide to the underwriters at the closing specified in the
underwriting agreement certificates in such denominations and
registered in such names as required by the underwriters to
permit prompt delivery to each purchaser.
(b) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities
arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted
to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant
pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the
registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the
Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is
against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore,
unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification
against such liabilities (other than the payment by the
registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer
or controlling person of the registrant in the successful
defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the
securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the
opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by
controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is
against public policy as expressed in the Act, and will be
governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
(c) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:
(1) For purposes of determining any liability under
the Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the
form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement
in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of
prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act
shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of
the time it was declared effective.
(2) For the purpose of determining any liability
under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective
amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to
be a new registration statement relating to the securities
offered herein, and the offering of such securities at that time
shall be deemed to be the initial
bona fide
offering
thereof.
(d) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:
(1) To file, during any period in which offers or
sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this
registration statement:
(i) To include any prospectus required by
Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;
(ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events
arising after the effective date of the registration statement
(or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which,
II-5
Part II.
Information not required in prospectus
individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change
in the information set forth in the registration statement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in
volume of common stock offered (if the total dollar value of
common stock offered would not exceed that which was registered)
and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated
maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of
prospectus filed with the SEC pursuant to Rule 424(b) if,
in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no
more than a 20.0% change in the maximum aggregate offering price
set forth in the Calculation of Registration Fee
table in the effective registration statement; and
(iii) To include any material information with
respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in
the registration statement or any material change to such
information in the registration statement.
(2) That, for the purpose of determining any
liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such
post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial
bona fide
offering thereof.
(3) To remove from registration by means of a
post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered
which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.
(4) That, for the purpose of determining liability
under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser, if the
registrant is subject to Rule 430C, each prospectus filed
pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement
relating to an offering, other than registration statements
relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in
reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and
included in the registration statement as of the date it is
first used after effectiveness. Provided, however, that no
statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is
part of the registration statement or made in a document
incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the
registration statement or prospectus that is part of the
registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of
contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify
any statement that was made in the registration statement or
prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made
in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use.
(5) That, for the purpose of determining liability of
the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser
in the initial distribution of the securities, the undersigned
registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities
of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration
statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell
the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered
or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following
communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to
the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such
securities to such purchaser:
(i) Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the
undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be
filed pursuant to Rule 424;
(ii) Any free writing prospectus relating to the
offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant
or used or referred to by the undersigned registrant;
(iii) The portion of any other free writing
prospectus relating to the offering containing material
information about the undersigned registrant or its securities
provided by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant; and
(iv) Any other communication that is an offer in the
offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.
II-6
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe
that it meets all of the requirements for filing on
Form S-11
and has duly caused Pre-Effective Amendment No. 7 to this
registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Orlando,
State of Florida on the
5
th
day
of October, 2010.
LEGACY HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES TRUST INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/
Thomas
J. Hutchison III
|
Thomas J. Hutchison III
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
Pre-Effective Amendment No. 7 to the registration statement
has been signed by the following person in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
/s/
Thomas
J. Hutchison III
Thomas
J. Hutchison III
|
|
Chairman of the Board, Sole Director, and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
October 5, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Mark
E. Patten
Mark
E. Patten
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
October 5, 2010
|
II-7
Exhibit index
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit
Description
|
|
|
|
1
|
.1
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Form of Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Legacy
Healthcare Properties Trust Inc.
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Form of Bylaws of Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust Inc.
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen common stock certificate
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Form of Warrant Agreement, including the Contingent Warrant
Issuance Form
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Form of Warrant Certificate
|
|
5
|
.1
|
|
Opinion of Venable LLP superseded by Exhibit 5.2
|
|
5
|
.2
|
|
Opinion of Venable LLP
|
|
5
|
.3
|
|
Opinion of Hunton & Williams LLP
|
|
8
|
.1
|
|
Tax opinion of Hunton & Williams LLP
superseded by Exhibit 8.2
|
|
8
|
.2
|
|
Tax opinion of Hunton & Williams LLP
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Form of Agreement of Limited Partnership of Legacy Healthcare
Properties, LP
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated April 27, 2010,
by and among WSL Holdings, IV, L.L.C., Walton Acquisition
Holdings IV, L.P., SL Jupiter Holdings, L.L.C., Mangrove
Bay Investors, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle Contribution Company,
L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle
CI-II,
L.L.C., as sellers, and Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust Inc.,
as purchaser
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Form of Subscription Agreement
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Form of Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust Inc. 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan superseded by Exhibit 10.16
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Form of Stock Award Agreement
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement to be entered into by Legacy
Healthcare Properties Trust Inc. with each of its executive
officers, directors and director nominees
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and Thomas J.
Hutchison III superseded by Exhibit 10.17
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and Phillip M. Anderson, Jr.
superseded by Exhibit 10.18
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and Mark E. Patten superseded
by Exhibit 10.19
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and James R. Hendrix
superseded by Exhibit 10.20
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and John W. Krueger superseded
by Exhibit 10.21
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
First Amendment to Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated
May 27, 2010, by and among WSL Holdings, IV, L.L.C.,
Walton Acquisition Holdings IV, L.P., SL Jupiter Holdings,
L.L.C., Mangrove Bay Investors, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle
Contribution Company, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle
CI-II,
L.L.C., as sellers, and Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust Inc.,
as purchaser, and joined in by Walton Street Real Estate Fund
IV, L.P., Senior Lifestyle Corporation and Senior Lifestyle
Management, L.L.C., as guarantors, and Legacy Healthcare
Advisors, LLC, as an indemnifying party
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Second Amendment to Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated
June 2, 2010, by and among WSL Holdings, IV, L.L.C.,
Walton Acquisition Holdings IV, L.P., SL Jupiter Holdings,
L.L.C., Mangrove Bay Investors, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle
Contribution Company, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle CI-II, L.L.C., as
sellers, and Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust Inc., as
purchaser, and joined in by Legacy Healthcare Advisors, LLC, as
an indemnifying party, and Walton Street Real Estate
Fund IV, L.P. and Senior Lifestyle Management, LLC, as
guarantors
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit
Description
|
|
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Third Amendment to Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated
July 9, 2010, by and among WSL Holdings, IV, L.L.C., Walton
Acquisition Holdings IV, L.P., SL Jupiter Holdings, L.L.C.,
Mangrove Bay Investors, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle Contribution
Company, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle CI-II, L.L.C., as sellers, and
Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust, Inc., as purchaser, and
joined in by Legacy Healthcare Advisors LLC, as an indemnifying
party, and Walton Street Real Estate Fund IV, L.P. and
Senior Lifestyle Management, LLC, as guarantors
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated
July 29, 2010, by and among WSL Holdings, IV, L.L.C.,
Walton Acquisition Holdings IV, L.P., SL Jupiter Holdings,
L.L.C., Mangrove Bay Investors, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle
Contribution Company, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle
CI-II,
L.L.C., as sellers, and Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust,
Inc., as purchaser, and joined in by Legacy Healthcare Advisors
LLC, as an indemnifying party, and Walton Street Real Estate
Fund IV, L.P. and Senior Lifestyle Management, LLC, as
guarantors
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Form of Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust Inc. 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and Thomas J.
Hutchison III superseded by Exhibit 10.22
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and Phillip M.
Anderson, Jr. superseded by Exhibit 10.23
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and Mark E. Patten
superseded by Exhibit 10.24
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and James R. Hendrix
superseded by Exhibit 10.25
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and John W. Krueger
superseded by Exhibit 10.26
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and Thomas J. Hutchison III
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and Phillip M. Anderson, Jr.
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and Mark E. Patten
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and James R. Hendrix
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Legacy Healthcare
Properties Trust Inc. and John W. Krueger
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated
August 26, 2010, by and among WSL Holdings, IV, L.L.C.,
Walton Acquisition Holdings IV, L.P., SL Jupiter Holdings,
L.L.C., Mangrove Bay Investors, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle
Contribution Company, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle CI-II, L.L.C., as
sellers, and Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust, Inc., as
purchaser, and joined in by Legacy Healthcare Advisors LLC, as
an indemnifying party, and Walton Street Real Estate
Fund IV, L.P. and Senior Lifestyle Management, LLC, as
guarantors
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
Sixth Amendment to Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated
September 12, 2010, by and among WSL Holdings, IV, L.L.C.,
Walton Acquisition Holdings IV, L.P., SL Jupiter Holdings,
L.L.C., Mangrove Bay Investors, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle
Contribution Company, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle CI-II, L.L.C., as
sellers, and Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust, Inc., as
purchaser, and joined in by Legacy Healthcare Advisors LLC, as
an indemnifying party, and Walton Street Real Estate
Fund IV, L.P. and Senior Lifestyle Management, LLC, as
guarantors
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit
Description
|
|
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
Seventh Amendment to Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated
September 30, 2010, by and among WSL Holdings, IV, L.L.C.,
Walton Acquisition Holdings IV, L.P., SL Jupiter Holdings,
L.L.C., Mangrove Bay Investors, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle
Contribution Company, L.L.C., Senior Lifestyle CI-II, L.L.C., as
sellers, and Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust, Inc., as
purchaser, and joined in by Legacy Healthcare Advisors LLC, as
an indemnifying party, and Walton Street Real Estate
Fund IV, L.P. and Senior Lifestyle Management, LLC, as
guarantors
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
List of Subsidiaries of Legacy Healthcare Properties Trust Inc.
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP
|
|
23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
|
|
23
|
.3
|
|
Consent of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
|
|
23
|
.4
|
|
Consent of Venable LLP (included in Exhibit 5.2)
|
|
23
|
.5
|
|
Consent of Hunton & Williams LLP (included in Exhibit
5.3 and Exhibit 8.2)
|
|
23
|
.6
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP
|
|
99
|
.1
|
|
Consent of James W. Duncan, Jr. to being named as a director
|
|
99
|
.2
|
|
Consent of Joseph E. Gibbs to being named as a director
|
|
99
|
.3
|
|
Consent of Dianna F. Morgan to being named as a director
|
|
99
|
.4
|
|
Consent of Robert E. Parsons, Jr. to being named as a
director
|
|
99
|
.5
|
|
Consent of David M. Thomas to being named as a director
|
Legacy Healthcare Properties (NYSE:LRP)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Okt 2024 bis Nov 2024
Legacy Healthcare Properties (NYSE:LRP)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Nov 2023 bis Nov 2024