UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE
14A
Proxy Statement
Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
☑ |
Filed by the Registrant |
☐ |
Filed by a party other than the Registrant |
|
CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX: |
☐ |
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
☐ |
|
Confidential, for Use
of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2)) |
☑ |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
☐ |
|
Definitive Additional
Materials |
☐ |
|
Soliciting Material under
§240.14a-12 |
Abbott Laboratories
(Name of Registrant
as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the
Registrant)
PAYMENT OF FILING FEE (CHECK ALL BOXES
THAT APPLY): |
☑ |
|
No fee required |
☐ |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary
materials |
☐ |
|
Fee computed on table in exhibit
required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and
0-11 |
Table of
Contents

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING
OF SHAREHOLDERS AND
PROXY STATEMENT 2022
Table of
Contents
Abbott
Laboratories
100
Abbott Park Road
Abbott
Park, Illinois 60064-6400 U.S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
On the Cover: Dr. Veronika Meyer
St. Gallen, Switzerland
Veronika, a retired professor of chromatography, has been active
her entire life, and takes every opportunity she can to go hiking
in the mountains – those near her home, and others far afield.
Notably, she was the first woman with a mechanical heart valve to
reach the summit of Mt. Everest.
|
|
|
Table of
Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 |
1 |
Table of
Contents
NOTICE OF 2022 ANNUAL
MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials
for the Shareholder Meeting to Be Held on April 29, 2022
The Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of Abbott Laboratories will
be held on Friday, April 29, 2022, at 9:00 a.m. Central Time.
The 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held virtually to
enable broader and more convenient shareholder participation and to
support the health and safety of Abbott’s shareholders, employees,
and communities during the ongoing coronavirus pandemic. There will
not be a physical location for the Annual Meeting, and shareholders
will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person.
Shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 2, 2022
will be able to attend the Annual Meeting at
meetnow.global/ABT2022. To be admitted to the Annual Meeting,
shareholders will be required to enter a 15-digit control number.
Shareholders who wish to attend the meeting on a listen-only phone
line should contact Abbott representatives at 224-668-7238 or
abbottshareholders@abbott.com to obtain the meeting telephone
number in advance of the meeting. Please see page 90 for further
instructions on how to be admitted to the Annual Meeting.
Shareholders will be asked to vote on the following items of
business:
Agenda |
|
|
|
Board
Voting
Recommendation |
Item 1 |
|
Election
of the 12 director nominees named in this proxy statement to hold
office until the next Annual Meeting or until the next meeting of
shareholders at which directors are elected |
|
FOR Each Director Nominee |
Item 2 |
|
Ratification
of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as auditors of Abbott
for 2022 |
|
FOR |
Item 3 |
|
Approval,
on an advisory basis, of executive compensation |
|
FOR |
Items
4-8 |
|
Five
shareholder proposals, if properly presented at the
meeting |
|
AGAINST |
Shareholders will also transact such other business as may properly
come before the meeting, including any adjournment or postponement
thereof.
This proxy statement and the accompanying proxy card, and the
Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, are being
provided to shareholders on or about March 18, 2022.
Abbott’s 2022 Proxy Statement and 2021 Annual Report to
Shareholders are available at www.abbott.com/proxy.
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
Please sign and promptly return your proxy or voting instruction
form in the enclosed envelope, or vote your shares by telephone or
using the Internet.
If you are a registered shareholder (you received your proxy
materials from Abbott through Abbott’s transfer agent,
Computershare), you may vote your shares by telephone
(1-800-652-VOTE (8683)) or on the Internet at
www.investorvote.com/abt.
If you are a beneficial shareholder (you received your proxy
materials from a broker, bank, or other agent), please refer to the
voting instructions provided to you by your broker, bank, or other
agent.
By order of the Board of Directors.
HUBERT L. ALLEN
Secretary
March 18, 2022
2 |
 |
Table of
Contents
PROXY SUMMARY
This summary contains highlights about Abbott and the upcoming
2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. This summary does not contain
all of the information that you should consider in advance of the
meeting, and we encourage you to read the entire proxy statement
carefully before voting.
ABBOTT’S
DIVERSIFIED BUSINESS MODEL DELIVERS LEADING SHAREHOLDER
RETURNS |
Abbott’s sustained strong performance has resulted in total
shareholder return (TSR) exceeding the peer median and major market
indices on a one-, three-, and five-year basis.
Abbott’s
three-year TSR of 104% is more than twice that of the peer group
median, and Abbott’s five-year TSR of 300% is more than four times
that of the peer median. These consistent
top-tier returns are driven by strong execution, an effective
governance structure, and the strength of our diversified business
model with leadership positions in some of the largest and fastest
growing markets in healthcare and innovative product portfolios
across our businesses.
Abbott
delivered strong returns for shareholders in 2021, despite the
continued global impact and uncertainty of COVID-19, and exceeded
the financial targets that were set at the beginning of the
year. Abbott’s one-year TSR
was 31%, more than two and a half times the peer median TSR, a
testament to the strength of our diversified business model and
ability to innovate and deliver in this challenging
environment.

In addition to delivering significant shareholder returns, Abbott
continued to take important steps to position the Company for
long-term, sustainable growth.
ROBUST INNOVATION
PIPELINE |
|
INVESTING FOR
FUTURE GROWTH |
|
SHAREHOLDER
RETURNS |
|
GLOBAL LEADER IN
COVID-19 TESTING |
● Steady
stream of important product approvals across our businesses that
will be significant contributors to growth in the coming
years. |
|
● Increased
manufacturing scale and capabilities across several important
products.
● Nearly
$2 billion invested in internal capital projects in the past
year.
|
|
● Returned
50% of operating cash flow to shareholders in 2021 and announced
the 50th year of consecutive dividend increases, demonstrating
Abbott’s financial strength and commitment to shareholder
returns. |
|
● Delivered
1 billion tests in 2021 to help meet global testing
needs.
● Abbott’s
rapid response and significant scale have allowed for broad access
to testing and further positioned Abbott as a global leader in
diagnostics.
|
|
|
 |
3 |
Table of
Contents
SHAREHOLDER FEEDBACK
In 2021, we met or initiated contact with shareholders representing
over 60% of our outstanding shares, including 100% of our top 20
investors, in an open dialogue to discuss our compensation program
and various topics, including:
|
● |
The
pandemic’s impact on our business, our COVID-19 testing response,
and the strength and resilience of our diversified business
model. |
|
● |
Business
and sustainability strategy, including Abbott’s new 2030
Sustainability Plan and its focus on creating new life-changing
technologies and products, expanding access and affordability of
new product innovations and advancing health equity. |
|
● |
Human
capital management and Abbott’s commitment to diversity, equity,
and inclusion, including Abbott’s new Diversity, Equity and
Inclusion Report which provides goals, our progress against them,
and disclosure of EEO-1 data. |
|
● |
Board
composition and refreshment, including the addition of four new
independent directors since 2018, three of whom are women and/or
minorities. |
|
● |
Executive
compensation program, including Abbott’s continued enhanced
compensation disclosure. |
Their feedback was overwhelmingly positive, which was reflected in
the 92% support for our Say-on-Pay Proposal.
KEY FEATURES OF OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM
The following practices and policies ensure alignment of interests
between shareholders and executives, and effective ongoing
compensation governance.
Compensation
Practice |
|
Abbott
Policy |
More
Information
On
Page |
Compensation
is Market-Based |
Yes |
Benchmark
peers with investment profiles, operating characteristics, and
employment and business markets similar to Abbott. Annual incentive
plan goals are set to exceed market growth in relevant
markets/business segments |
30-33 |
Compensation
is Performance-Based |
Yes |
Short-term
and long-term incentive awards are 100% performance based. Annual
incentive plan goals are set to exceed market growth in relevant
markets/business segments |
31-33 |
Double-Trigger
Change in Control |
Yes |
Provide
change in control benefits under double-trigger circumstances
only |
66-67 |
Recoupment
Policy |
Yes |
Forfeiture
for misconduct provision in equity grants and recoup compensation
when warranted |
51 |
Robust
Share Ownership Guidelines |
Yes |
Require
significant share ownership for officers and directors, and share
retention requirements until guidelines are met |
27 and
50 |
Capped
Incentive Awards |
Yes |
Incentive
award payments are capped |
32 and
53 |
Independent
Compensation Committee Consultant |
Yes |
Committee
consultant performs no other work for Abbott |
22 |
Tax
Gross Ups |
No |
No tax
gross ups under our executive officer pay program |
49-50 |
Guaranteed
Bonuses |
No |
No
guaranteed bonuses |
31 |
Employment
Contracts |
No |
No
employment contracts |
65 |
Excessive
Risk Taking |
No |
No
highly leveraged incentive plans that encourage excessive risk
taking |
52-53 |
Hedging
of Company Shares |
No |
No
hedging of Abbott shares is allowed |
51 and
53 |
Discounted
Stock Options |
No |
No
discounted stock options are allowed or granted |
52 |
Details of the compensation decisions made for our named executive
officers are outlined on pages 38 to 48.
4 |
 |
Table of
Contents
The Board
of Directors recommends a vote FOR
the
election of each of the following nominees for director. All
nominees are currently serving as directors. Additional information
about each director nominee’s background and experience can be
found beginning on page 10.
Name |
|
Principal
Occupation |
|
Age |
|
Director
Since |
|
Committee
Memberships |
ROBERT
J. ALPERN, M.D. Independent |
|
Professor
and Former Dean, Yale School of Medicine |
|
71 |
|
2008 |
|
● Nominations
and Governance
● Public
Policy
|
SALLY
E. BLOUNT, PH.D. Independent |
|
President
and CEO, Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago, and
Professor and Former Dean, J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of
Management |
|
60 |
|
2011 |
|
● Nominations
and Governance
● Public
Policy
|
ROBERT
B. FORD |
|
Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Abbott
Laboratories |
|
48 |
|
2019 |
|
● Executive
(Chair) |
PAOLA
GONZALEZ Independent |
|
Vice
President and Treasurer, The Clorox Company |
|
50 |
|
2021 |
|
● Audit |
MICHELLE
A. KUMBIER Independent |
|
President,
Turf & Consumer Products, Briggs & Stratton,
LLC |
|
54 |
|
2018 |
|
● Audit
● Compensation
|
DARREN
W. McDEW Independent |
|
Retired
General, U.S. Air Force, and Former Commander of U.S.
Transportation Command |
|
61 |
|
2019 |
|
● Nominations
and Governance
● Public
Policy
|
NANCY
McKINSTRY Independent |
|
CEO
and Chairman of the Executive Board, Wolters Kluwer
N.V. |
|
63 |
|
2011 |
|
● Audit
(Chair)
● Compensation
● Executive
|
WILLIAM
A. OSBORN Lead Independent Director |
|
Retired
Chairman and CEO, Northern Trust Corporation |
|
74 |
|
2008 |
|
● Compensation
● Nominations
and Governance (Chair)
● Executive
|
MICHAEL
F. ROMAN Independent |
|
Chairman,
President, and CEO, 3M Company |
|
62 |
|
2021 |
|
● Audit
● Compensation
|
DANIEL
J. STARKS Independent |
|
Retired
Chairman, President and CEO, St. Jude Medical, Inc. |
|
67 |
|
2017 |
|
● Public
Policy |
JOHN
G. STRATTON Independent |
|
Executive
Chairman, Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. |
|
61 |
|
2017 |
|
● Audit
● Public
Policy
|
GLENN
F. TILTON Independent |
|
Retired
Chairman, President and CEO, UAL Corporation |
|
73 |
|
2007 |
|
● Audit
● Public
Policy (Chair)
● Executive
|
|
|
 |
5 |
Table of
Contents
Abbott is committed to strong corporate governance that is aligned
with shareholder interests. Our Board spends significant time with
Abbott’s senior management to understand the dynamics, issues, and
opportunities for Abbott, and also regularly monitors leading
practices in governance and adopts measures that it determines are
in the best interest of Abbott and its shareholders.
LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR WITH DISTINCT RESPONSIBILITIES
 |
Elected
annually by independent directors |
 |
Regularly
presides over executive sessions of independent directors at Board
meetings and provides feedback to management |
 |
Reviews
matters, such as agenda items and schedule sufficiency |
 |
Leads
annual performance review process |
 |
Oversees
process for identifying and evaluating director
candidates |
 |
Authority
to call meetings of independent directors |
 |
Communicate
regularly with the Chairman regarding appropriate agenda topics and
other Board-related matters |
 |
Confers
with the Nominations and Governance Committee and the CEO regarding
management succession planning |
 |
Liaises
between Chairman and independent directors |
 |
Engages
directly with major shareholders as appropriate |
ROBUST BOARD EVALUATION AND REFRESHMENT PROCESS

OTHER BOARD GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS
● |
Fully
independent Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominations
and Governance Committee, and Public Policy Committee |
● |
Committee
chairs recommended to the Board by the Nominations and Governance
Committee and approved by the full Board |
● |
All
directors elected annually by majority vote |
● |
Executive
sessions of the independent directors, led by the Lead Independent
Director, at each regularly scheduled Board meeting |
● |
Annual
anonymous evaluations of the Board, Committees, and each
director |
● |
Strong
risk oversight, with areas of focus including business strategy,
human capital, cybersecurity and data protection, and Abbott’s
sustainability, environmental, and social responsibility
practices |
|
|
6 |
 |
Table of
Contents
HIGHLY QUALIFIED BOARD, WITH BROAD DIVERSITY ACROSS BACKGROUNDS,
SKILLS AND EXPERIENCES
THE
12 DIRECTOR NOMINEES COMPRISE A WELL-BALANCED, DIVERSE
BOARD. |
RELEVANT EXPERTISE TO PROVIDE OVERSIGHT AND GUIDANCE FOR
ABBOTT’S DIVERSIFIED OPERATING MODEL |
|
TENURE

|
Healthcare
and Medical Device Industry |
|
Finance |
|
Risk
Management, including Data/Cybersecurity |
|
Global
Strategy and Operations |
|
Regulatory/Compliance |
|
BOARD DIVERSITY

|
Consumer
Products |
|
Senior
Leadership with Multinational Corporations and Diverse Business
Models |
|
Global
Supply Chain Operations |
|
Government
and Military Leadership |
|
|
|
 |
7 |
Table of
Contents
OUR COMMITMENT TO
SUSTAINABILITY |
At Abbott, sustainability means managing our company to deliver
long-term positive impact for the people we serve—shaping the
future of healthcare and helping the greatest number of people live
better and healthier lives.
Our sustainability efforts are focused on the most relevant
industry and company-specific risks and opportunities. In December
2020, we launched our new 2030 Sustainability Plan focused on
Abbott’s greatest opportunities to make an impact.
These areas have been identified through an in-depth materiality
analysis, directed by executive management, and in partnership with
numerous diverse external stakeholders, including suppliers,
customers, and investors. We aim to deliver sustainable,
responsible growth that improves lives and creates value in
communities around the world.
2030 SUSTAINABILITY PLAN GOALS
Our work touched 2 billion lives this past year, and by 2030, we
intend to reach more than 3 billion lives per year, improving the
lives of 1 in every 3 people on the planet by 2030.
INNOVATE FOR ACCESS AND AFFORDABILITY
 |
Make
access and affordability core to new product innovation |
|
 |
Transform
care for chronic disease, malnutrition and infectious diseases |
|
 |
Advance
health equity through partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrate access, affordability and data insights
as design principles into our work and portfolio. |
|
Innovate to transform
the standard of care for diabetes and deliver break-through
technologies to improve clinical outcomes for people with
cardiovascular disease.
Deliver scalable, integrated solutions
to reduce preventable deaths and infectious diseases with
diagnostics, treatment and education programs.
|
|
Expand affordable access
to healthcare for underserved, diverse and at-risk communities by
delivering innovative, decentralized models of care.
Partner with stakeholders to improve
health outcomes by advancing standards and building access to
affordable, integrated solutions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BUILD A FOUNDATION FOR THE FUTURE
 |
CLIMATE
Protect a
healthy environment
Protect our climate and
water, including reducing absolute Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions
by 30% from 2018 baseline
Reduce product packaging
and waste, including addressing 50 million pounds of packaging and
using circular economy approach to achieve at least 90% waste
diversion rate
|
|
 |
OUR
PEOPLE
Build the
diverse, innovative workforce of tomorrow
Create opportunities in
Abbott’s STEM programs and internships for more than 100,000 young
people
Achieve gender balance
across our global management team and ensure one-third of our U.S.
leadership roles are held by people from underrepresented
groups
|
 |
SUPPLY
CHAIN
Ensure a resilient,
diverse and responsible supply chain
|
|
 |
DATA AND DATA
PRIVACY
Responsibly connect data,
technology, and care
|
|
Certify that 80% of newly
contracted direct material spends incorporate social responsibility
requirements
Ensure ethical sourcing from
suppliers with high-risk sustainability factors through 100%
auditing
Increase spend with
diverse and small businesses 50%
|
|
|
Be a trusted
healthcare leader in secure and responsible data collection, use,
management and privacy, in order to protect our patients and
customers, empower them to make better, more complete decisions
about their health, and drive innovation through insights and
analytics |
The Board of Directors and its committees have oversight over
Abbott’s environmental, social and governance practices. The Board
has regular discussions with management on all the above
sustainability matters, as well as workplace, management, and Board
diversity, emerging governance practices and trends, global
compliance matters, and sustainability reporting.
Executive compensation is linked to Sustainability commitments, as
discussed in more detail on pages 36 and 37.
To learn more about Abbott’s Sustainability efforts, please visit
www.abbott.com/responsibility/sustainability.html.
|
|
8 |
 |
Table of
Contents
VOTING MATTERS AND BOARD
RECOMMENDATIONS |
ITEM
1 |
|
Election of 12 Director Nominees Named in this Proxy
Statement: The Board recommends a vote FOR each
nominee
● Highly qualified Board, with diversity in
backgrounds, skills and experiences.
● Relevant expertise to provide oversight and
guidance for Abbott’s diversified operating model. See pages 10 to
15 for more information.
|
|
|
|
ITEM
2 |
|
Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as Auditors: The Board
recommends a vote FOR
● Independent firm with significant industry and
financial reporting expertise.
● See pages 69 to 70 for more information.
|
|
|
|
ITEM
3 |
|
Say on Pay: Advisory Vote on the Approval of Executive
Compensation: The Board recommends a vote FOR
● Market-based structure producing differentiated
awards based on both company and individual performance, managed
with independent oversight by the Compensation Committee.
● Aligned to drive Abbott’s strategic priorities,
reflects consistent above-market TSR and upper quartile relative
3-year TSR performance vs. peers, as well as upper quartile 1-year
and 5-year TSR. See pages 71 and 72 for more information.
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDER
PROPOSALS
4-8
|
|
The Board recommends a vote AGAINST
● Proposal 4: Special Shareholder Meeting
Threshold
● Proposal 5: Independent Board Chairman
● Proposal 6: 10b5-1 Plans
● Proposal 7: Lobbying Disclosure
● Proposal 8: Antimicrobial Resistance Report
● See pages 73 to 85 for more information.
|
|
|
 |
9 |
Table of
Contents
NOMINEES FOR ELECTION
AS DIRECTORS
 |
|
ROBERT J. ALPERN, M. D.
Director Since
2008 Age 71
Ensign Professor of Medicine
and Physiology and Professor of Internal Medicine and Cellular and
Molecular Physiology, and Former Dean of Yale School of
Medicine
|
PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND
● |
Ensign Professor of Medicine and Professor
of Internal Medicine at Yale School of Medicine since June
2004. |
● |
Dean of Yale School of Medicine from June 2004 to January
2020. |
● |
Dean of The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
from July 1998 to May 2004. |
● |
Served on the Board of Directors of Yale New Haven Hospital
from October 2005 to January 2020. |
OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS
AbbVie Inc., Tricida, Inc.
KEY QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERTISE
As a result of his long-tenured leadership positions at the Yale
School of Medicine and The University of Texas Southwestern Medical
Center, and as a former Director on the Board of Yale New Haven
Hospital, Dr. Alpern contributes valuable insights to the
Board through his medical and scientific expertise and his
knowledge of the health care environment and the scientific nature
of Abbott’s key research and development initiatives.
 |
|
SALLY
E. BLOUNT, PH. D.
Director Since
2011 Age 60
President and Chief
Executive Officer, Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of
Chicago, and Michael L. Nemmers Professor of Strategy and Former
Dean of the J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management at
Northwestern University
|
PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND
● |
President and Chief Executive Officer and
Board Member of Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago
since August 2020. |
● |
Michael L. Nemmers Professor of Strategy and Dean of the J.L.
Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University
from 2010 to 2018. |
● |
Dean of the New York University Undergraduate College and Vice
Dean of its Leonard N. Stern School of Business from 2004 to
2010. |
● |
Professor at the New York University Leonard School of Business
from 2001 to 2010, and became the Abraham L. Gitlow Professor of
Management in 2004. |
● |
Held academic posts at the University of Chicago’s Graduate
School of Business from 1992 to 2001. |
● |
Serves on the Board of Directors of the Joyce Foundation. |
OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS
Ulta Beauty, Inc.
KEY QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERTISE
Having served as Dean of the J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of
Management at Northwestern University and as Vice Dean and Dean of
the Undergraduate College of New York University’s Leonard N. Stern
School of Business, Ms. Blount provides Abbott’s Board with
expertise on business organization, governance and business
management matters.
|
|
10 |
 |
Table of
Contents
 |
|
ROBERT B. FORD
Director Since
2019 Age 48
Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer, Abbott Laboratories
|
PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND
● |
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of Abbott since December 2021. |
● |
President and Chief Executive Officer of Abbott from March 2020
to December 2021. |
● |
President and Chief Operating Officer of Abbott from 2018 to
2020. |
● |
Executive Vice President, Medical Devices of Abbott from 2015
to 2018. |
● |
Senior Vice President, Diabetes Care of Abbott from 2014 to
2015. |
● |
Held various leadership roles across Abbott’s Diagnostics,
Nutrition, and Diabetes Care businesses in the U.S. and Latin
America since joining Abbott in 1996. |
KEY QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERTISE
As Abbott’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and
having previously held various leadership positions at Abbott,
including Chief Operating Officer, where he was responsible for all
of Abbott’s operating businesses, Mr. Ford contributes an extensive
knowledge of the Company’s global operations, a wide breadth of
experience in strategy and execution, and valuable insights into
global healthcare markets.
 |
|
PAOLA
GONZALEZ
Director Since
2021 Age 50
Vice President and
Treasurer, The Clorox Company
|
PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND
● |
Vice President and Treasurer of The Clorox
Company, a manufacturer and marketer of consumer and professional
products, since January 2018. |
● |
Vice President of Finance, Household and Lifestyle Segments of
Clorox from 2010 to 2017. |
● |
Vice President of Finance, Global Strategic Initiatives of
Clorox from 2008 to 2010. |
● |
Held various leadership roles in finance across Clorox since
joining Clorox in 1997. |
● |
Prior to Clorox, worked in finance for American Airlines in
Latin America. |
KEY QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERTISE
As Vice President and Treasurer of The Clorox Company, Ms. Gonzalez
is responsible for treasury, investor relations and real estate
matters, and through her prior financial roles in several of its
businesses, has considerable experience providing financial
leadership to a multinational public company with multiple
businesses, contributing significant financial expertise and
knowledge of financial statements, corporate finance and accounting
matters.
|
|
 |
11 |
Table of
Contents
 |
|
MICHELLE A. KUMBIER
Director Since
2018 Age 54
President,
Turf & Consumer Products, Briggs & Stratton,
LLC
|
PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND
● |
Senior Vice President and President,
Turf & Consumer Products of Briggs & Stratton,
LLC, a manufacturer and marketer of engines and outdoor power
equipment, since March 2022. |
● |
Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of
Harley-Davidson Motor Company, a motorcycle and related products
manufacturer, from 2017 to 2020. |
● |
Senior Vice President of Motor Company Product and Operations
of Harley-Davidson from 2015 to 2017. |
● |
Held various other executive roles across Harley-Davidson, from
1997 to 2015. |
● |
Held various positions at Kohler Company, maker of premium
plumbing products, from 1986 to 1997. |
OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated, Tenneco Inc. In connection with
Tenneco’s publicly announced agreement to be acquired by Apollo
Funds, Ms. Kumbier would cease to be a Tenneco Director upon the
acquisition closing.
KEY QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERTISE
Having served in several executive roles at Harley-Davidson, Ms.
Kumbier contributes extensive experience in the management of a
multinational public company, including significant manufacturing,
product development, business development and strategic planning
experience.
 |
|
DARREN W. MCDEW
Director Since
2019 Age 61
Retired General, United
States Air Force, and Former Commander of U.S. Transportation
Command
|
PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND
● |
Four-star general who served for
36 years in the United States military before retiring in
October 2018. |
● |
Commander, U.S. Transportation Command, the single manager for
global air, land and sea transportation for the U.S. Department of
Defense from 2015 to 2018. |
● |
Held various leadership roles across the U.S. Military,
including Vice Director for Strategic Plans and Policy for the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, Military Aide to the President, Director of
Air Force Public Affairs, and Chief of Air Force Senate Liaison
Division. |
● |
Serves on the Board of Directors of Rolls-Royce, North America,
Inc., United Services Automobile Association, and Boys &
Girls Club of America. |
OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS
Parsons Corporation
KEY QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERTISE
Through his extensive leadership in the U.S. Air Force, General
McDew contributes significant experience managing large, complex
global operations, including strategic planning, security and risk
management, cybersecurity, and supply chain and infrastructure
management.
|
|
12 |
 |
Table of
Contents
 |
|
NANCY
MCKINSTRY
Director Since
2011 Age 63
Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Executive Board, Wolters Kluwer N.V.
|
PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND
● |
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Executive Board of Wolters Kluwer N.V., a global information,
software, and services provider, since September 2003, and a member
of its Executive Board since June 2001. |
● |
Member of the European Round Table of Industrialists. |
● |
Serves on the Board of Directors of Russell Reynolds Associates
and the Board of Overseers of Columbia Business School. |
● |
Served on the Board of Directors of Telefonaktiebolaget LM
Ericsson from 2004 to 2012. |
OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS
Accenture plc
KEY QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERTISE
As the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Executive Board
of Wolters Kluwer N.V., Ms. McKinstry contributes global
perspectives and management experience, including an understanding
of key issues facing a multinational business such as Abbott’s.
 |
|
WILLIAM A.
OSBORN
Lead
Independent Director
Director Since
2008 Age 74
Retired Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer, Northern Trust Corporation
|
PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND
● |
Chairman of Northern Trust Corporation, a
multibank holding company, from 1995 to 2009 and Chief Executive
Officer from 1995 to 2008. |
● |
President of Northern Trust Corporation and The Northern Trust
Company, a banking services company, from 2003 to 2006. |
● |
Served on the Board of Directors of Nicor, Inc. from 1999
to 2006. |
● |
Served on the Board of Directors of Tribune Company from 2001
to 2012. |
● |
Served on the Board of Directors of Caterpillar Inc. from 2000
to 2021. |
● |
Served on the Board of Directors of General Dynamics
Corporation from 2009 to 2021. |
KEY QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERTISE
Having served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Northern Trust Corporation, Mr. Osborn acquired broad
experience in successfully overseeing complex global businesses
operating in highly regulated industries, including oversight of
financial, operational, and governance matters facing large public
companies.
|
|
 |
13 |
Table of
Contents
 |
|
MICHAEL F. ROMAN
Director Since
2021 Age 62
Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer, 3M Company
|
PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND
● |
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
Executive Officer of 3M Company, a global manufacturing and
technology company, since May 2019. |
● |
Chief Executive Officer of 3M from July 2018 to May 2019. |
● |
Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President of 3M from
July 2017 to June 2018 with direct responsibilities for 3M’s five
business groups and its international operations. |
● |
Executive Vice President, Industrial Business Group of 3M from
June 2014 to July 2017. |
● |
Senior Vice President, Business Development of 3M from May 2013
to June 2014. |
● |
Vice President and General Manager of Industrial Adhesives and
Tapes Division of 3M from September 2011 to May 2013. |
OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS
3M Company
KEY QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERTISE
As Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of
3M Company, Mr. Roman has extensive experience leading a
multinational public company with multiple businesses, contributing
significant manufacturing, supply chain, technology, and finance
experience, as well as valuable insights into corporate strategy
and risk management.
 |
|
DANIEL J. STARKS
Director Since
2017 Age 67
Retired Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer, St. Jude
Medical, Inc.
|
PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND
● |
Executive Chairman of the Board of St. Jude
Medical, Inc., a medical device manufacturer, from January 2016 to
January 2017, when Abbott completed its acquisition of
St. Jude Medical. |
● |
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of
St. Jude Medical from 2004 until his retirement in January
2016. |
● |
President and Chief Operating Officer of St. Jude Medical
from 2001 to 2004. |
● |
President and CEO, Cardiac Rhythm Management Business of St.
Jude Medical from 1997 to 2001. |
KEY QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERTISE
Having served as St. Jude Medical’s Executive Chairman and its
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and having joined
St. Jude Medical in 1996, Mr. Starks contributes not only
comprehensive and critical knowledge of St. Jude Medical’s
operations, but also extensive business and management experience
operating a global public company in a highly regulated
industry.
|
|
14 |
 |
Table of
Contents
 |
|
JOHN
G. STRATTON
Director Since
2017 Age 61
Executive Chairman,
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.
|
PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND
● |
Executive Chairman of Frontier
Communications Parent, Inc., a telecommunications company, since
April 2021. |
● |
Executive Vice President and President of Global Operations of
Verizon Communications Inc. from 2015 to 2018. |
● |
Executive Vice President and President of Global Enterprise and
Consumer Wireline of Verizon from 2014 to 2015. |
● |
President of Verizon Enterprise Solutions from 2012 to
2014. |
● |
Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President of Verizon
Wireless from 2010 to 2012. |
● |
Member of The President’s National Security Telecommunications
Advisory Committee from 2012 to 2018. |
● |
Director of the Cellular Telecommunications Industry
Association from 2015 to 2018. |
OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc., General Dynamics
Corporation
KEY QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERTISE
Through his executive leadership experience, Mr. Stratton
contributes extensive business and management expertise operating a
global public company such as Abbott, including valuable insights
on corporate strategy and risk management. His service on the
National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee enables him
to provide government perspective and experience in a highly
regulated industry.
 |
|
GLENN
F. TILTON
Director Since
2007 Age 73
Retired Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer, UAL Corporation
|
PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND
● |
Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer of UAL Corporation, an airline holding company, and
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of United Air
Lines, Inc., an air transportation company and wholly owned
subsidiary of UAL Corporation, from September 2002 to October
2010. |
● |
Served on the Board of Directors of United Continental
Holdings, Inc. from 2001 to 2013 and served as its
Non-Executive Chairman of the Board from October 2010 to December
2012. |
● |
Served on the Board of Directors of Lincoln National
Corporation from 2002 to 2007, TXU Corporation from 2005 to 2007,
and Corning Incorporated from 2010 to 2012. |
● |
Chairman of the Midwest for JPMorgan Chase & Co.
and a member of its companywide Executive Committee from June 2011
to June 2014. |
OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS
AbbVie Inc., Phillips 66
KEY QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERTISE
Having previously served as Chief Executive Officer of UAL
Corporation and United Air Lines, Non-Executive Chairman of the
Board of United Continental Holdings, Inc., Chairman of the
Midwest for JPMorgan Chase & Co., Chairman,
President, and Vice Chairman of Chevron Texaco, and as Interim
Chairman of Dynegy, Inc., Mr. Tilton acquired strong
management experience overseeing complex multinational businesses
operating in highly regulated industries, as well as expertise in
finance and capital markets matters.
|
|
 |
15 |
Table of
Contents
THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS AND ITS COMMITTEES
The Board of
Directors held 8 meetings in 2021. The average attendance of all
directors at Board and committee meetings in 2021 was 95% and each
director attended at least 75% of the total number of Board
meetings and meetings of the committees on which he or she served.
Abbott encourages its Board members to attend the annual
shareholders meeting. Last year, all of Abbott’s directors attended
the annual shareholders meeting.
The Board has
determined that each of following director nominees is independent
in accordance with the New York Stock Exchange listing standards:
Robert J. Alpern, M.D., Sally E. Blount, Ph.D., Paola Gonzalez,
Michelle A. Kumbier, Darren W. McDew, Nancy McKinstry, William A.
Osborn, Michael F. Roman, Daniel J. Starks, John G. Stratton, and
Glenn F. Tilton, as well as Roxanne S. Austin, who will continue to
serve as a director until the 2022 Annual Meeting, and Edward M.
Liddy and Phoebe N. Novakovic, who served as directors during a
portion of 2021.
To determine
independence, the Board applied the categorical standards attached
as Exhibit A to this proxy statement. The Board also considered
whether a director has any other material relationships with Abbott
or its subsidiaries and concluded that none of these directors had
a relationship that impaired his or her independence. This included
consideration of the fact that some of the directors or their
family members are officers or serve on boards of companies or
entities to which Abbott sold products or made contributions or
from which Abbott purchased products and services during the year.
In making its determination, the Board relied on both information
provided by the directors and information developed internally by
Abbott.
Abbott’s current
Board leadership is comprised of the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer, a Lead Independent Director, and
independent Committee chairs.
Robert B. Ford
currently serves as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer. The Board believes this is in the best interests of Abbott
and its shareholders, as it provides cohesive leadership and
direction for the Board and executive management, as well as clear
accountability and unified leadership in the execution of strategic
initiatives and business plans. Mr. Ford also has extensive
industry expertise and familiarity with Abbott’s global businesses,
such that his strategic and operational insights provide the Board
with a comprehensive vision, from long-term strategic direction to
day-to-day execution.
Abbott’s Board
leadership is further strengthened by:
● |
A
strong Lead Independent Director with significant roles and
responsibilities who is selected by and from the independent
members of the Board. Currently, the Chair of the Nominations and
Governance Committee, Mr. Osborn, is the Lead Independent
Director. |
● |
Fully independent Audit Committee, Compensation Committee,
Nominations and Governance Committee, and Public Policy Committee,
as required by Abbott’s Governance Guidelines. |
● |
Committee chairs who are recommended to the Board by the
Nominations and Governance Committee and approved by the full
Board. |
● |
Executive sessions of the independent directors, led by the Lead
Independent Director, that generally take place at each regularly
scheduled Board meeting. |
● |
Annual
anonymous evaluations of each director, including the Chairman of
the Board and Chief Executive Officer, led by the Lead Independent
Director and conducted by all directors. |
|
|
16 |
 |
Table of
Contents
Key functions and responsibilities of the Lead Independent
Director include:
● Preside at regularly conducted executive sessions of
the independent directors and provide feedback to the Chairman and
CEO and other senior management, as appropriate,
● Preside at all meetings of the Board at which the
Chairman is not present,
● Facilitate communication with the Board and serve as
liaison between the Chairman and the independent directors,
● Communicate regularly with the Chairman regarding
appropriate agenda topics and other Board related matters,
● Review and approve matters, such as agenda items,
meeting schedules to assure sufficient time for discussion of all
agenda items, and, where appropriate, information provided to the
Board,
● Confer with the Nominations and Governance Committee
and the CEO regarding management succession planning,
● Lead the annual performance reviews of individual
directors, the full Board, and each of its Committees,
● Oversee the process for identifying and evaluating
director candidates,
● Work with management on corporate governance issues
and developments,
● Has the authority to call meetings of the
independent directors, and
● Engage directly with major shareholders as
appropriate.
|
The Board
reviews its leadership structure at least annually and has
determined that this structure is in the best interests of Abbott
and its shareholders at this time. This structure balances strong,
independent oversight with extensive business knowledge and
experience. The Board also retains the flexibility necessary to
adopt the leadership structure in the best interests of Abbott and
its shareholders based on the specific circumstances and needs of
the business over time.
 |
17 |
Table of
Contents
BOARD DIVERSITY AND COMPOSITION |
In the process
of identifying nominees to serve as members of the Board of
Directors, the Nominations and Governance Committee considers the
Board’s diversity of relevant experience, areas of expertise,
ethnicity, gender, and geography and assesses the effectiveness of
the process in achieving that diversity.
The process used
to identify and select nominees has resulted in a balanced,
diverse, and well-rounded Board of Directors that possesses the
skills, experiences, and perspectives necessary for its oversight
role. All of Abbott’s directors exhibit:
 |
Global business perspective |
 |
Successful track record |
 |
Innovative thinking |
 |
Knowledge of corporate governance requirements and practices |
 |
High integrity |
 |
Commitment to
good corporate citizenship |
|
|
THE 12 DIRECTOR NOMINEES
COMPRISE A WELL-BALANCED, DIVERSE BOARD. |
RELEVANT EXPERTISE TO
PROVIDE OVERSIGHT AND GUIDANCE FOR ABBOTT’S DIVERSIFIED OPERATING
MODEL |
|
TENURE
 |
Healthcare and Medical Device Industry |
|
Finance |
|
Risk Management, including Data/Cybersecurity |
|
Global Strategy and Operations |
|
Regulatory/Compliance |
|
BOARD
DIVERSITY |
Consumer Products |
|
 |
Senior Leadership with Multinational Corporations and Diverse
Business Models |
|
Global Supply Chain Operations |
|
Government and Military Leadership |
|
|
|
18 |
 |
Table of
Contents
The Nominations
and Governance Committee assists the Board of Directors in
identifying individuals qualified to become Board members and
recommends to the Board the nominees for election as directors at
the next annual meeting of shareholders. The process used by the
Nominations and Governance Committee to identify a nominee to serve
as a member of the Board of Directors depends on the qualities
being sought. From time to time, Abbott engages an executive search
firm to assist the Committee in identifying individuals qualified
to be Board members.
Abbott’s outline
of directorship qualifications, which is part of Abbott’s corporate
governance guidelines, is available in the corporate governance
section of Abbott’s investor relations website
(www.abbottinvestor.com). These qualifications describe specific
characteristics that the Nominations and Governance Committee and
the Board take into consideration when selecting nominees for the
Board, such as:
|
● |
strong management experience and senior level experience in
medicine, |
|
● |
hospital administration, |
|
● |
medical and scientific research and development, |
|
● |
finance, |
|
● |
international business, |
|
● |
technology, |
|
● |
government, and |
|
● |
academic
administration. |
An individual
nominee is not required to satisfy all the characteristics listed
in the outline of directorship qualifications and there is no
requirement that all such characteristics be represented on the
Board.
In addition,
Board members should have backgrounds that, when combined, provide
a portfolio of experience and knowledge that will serve Abbott’s
governance and strategic needs. Board candidates will be considered
on the basis of a range of criteria, including broad based business
knowledge and relationships, prominence, and excellent reputations
in their primary fields of endeavor, as well as a global business
perspective and commitment to good corporate citizenship. Directors
should have demonstrated experience and ability that is relevant to
the Board of Directors’ oversight role with respect to Abbott’s
business and affairs. Each director’s biography includes the
particular experience and qualifications that led the Board to
conclude that the director should serve on the Board. The
directors’ biographies are on pages 10 through 15.
A description of
the procedure for the recommendation and nomination of directors,
including by proxy access, is on page 88.
 |
19 |
Table of
Contents
Abbott is
committed to strong governance that is aligned with shareholder
interests. Our Board spends significant time with Abbott’s senior
management to understand global dynamics, challenges, and
opportunities for Abbott. During these interactions, directors
provide insights and ask probing questions which guide management
decision making. This collaborative approach to risk oversight and
emphasis on long-term sustainability begins with our leaders and is
engrained in Abbott’s culture.
OVERSIGHT OF RISK
The Board has
risk oversight responsibility for Abbott, which it administers
directly and with assistance from its Committees. Throughout the
year, the Board and its Committees engage with management to
discuss a wide range of enterprise risks, such as risks related to
Abbott’s businesses, enterprise and product cybersecurity,
litigation, and human capital management, and they confirm the
alignment of risk assessment and mitigation with business strategy.
The Audit Committee conducts an annual review of the enterprise
risk management process, including the program structure, risk
assessment, and risk mitigation. The Board and its Committees also
consult with advisors, including legal counsel, internal and
external auditors, and consultants. Such engagement and
consultations are done by the full Board, independent directors in
executive sessions, or fully independent Committees, as
appropriate.
Specific risk
areas of focus for the Board, its Committees, and management
include:
|
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
● Business strategy and operations
● Management development and succession planning
● Human capital and diversity, equity and
inclusion
● Litigation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AUDIT COMMITTEE
● Accounting, internal controls, and financial
reporting
● Enterprise cybersecurity
● Information security and data protection
● Major financial and business risk exposures
|
|
|
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE
● Executive officer compensation, including incentive
compensation plans
● Equity-based plans
● Director compensation
|
|
|
NOMINATIONS
AND GOVERNANCE
COMMITTEE
● Board composition, refreshment, and succession
planning
● Board governance structure
● Governance guidelines and practices
|
|
|
PUBLIC POLICY
COMMITTEE
● Sustainability, environment, and social
responsibility
● Global ethics and compliance programs
● Product quality and cybersecurity, and data
privacy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MANAGEMENT
● Design and execution of Abbott’s enterprise risk
management process
● Identification, evaluation, and prioritization of
risks
● Development and implementation of mitigating
actions
● Regular communication with the Board and its
Committees on how risks are being managed
|
|
|
|
20 |
 |
Table of
Contents
OVERSIGHT OF STRATEGY
One of the
Board’s key responsibilities is overseeing and monitoring business
strategy. The Board conducts an annual in-depth review of the
long-term strategy and areas of focus for Abbott and its
businesses. The Board also regularly engages with management
throughout the year to review and discuss the strategic planning
for Abbott’s businesses, including operating and financial plans,
strategic business priorities and initiatives, and key risks and
opportunities. These reviews include discussions of matters such as
global talent management and succession planning, diversity, equity
and inclusion, global market dynamics and changes in regulatory and
competitive landscapes, supply chain initiatives and sustainability
programs, and significant corporate actions such as acquisitions
and capital expenditures.
The Board
monitors management’s strategy execution, receiving regular updates
to confirm that activities align with such strategies and that
progress is made toward strategic objectives. Most years, the Board
also visits Abbott facilities and locations around the world to
observe business dynamics and strategy execution by the
businesses.
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS |
The Board of
Directors has five committees established in Abbott’s By-Laws:
Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominations and Governance
Committee, Public Policy Committee, and Executive Committee.
All members
of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominations and
Governance Committee, and Public Policy Committee are
independent. These Committees are governed by written charters
setting forth their respective responsibilities, and each Committee
reviews its charter at least annually, with any changes being
recommended to the full Board for approval. Copies of the Committee
charters are all available in the governance section of Abbott’s
investor relations website (www.abbottinvestor.com).
|
|
COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIPS |
Current Members |
|
Audit
Committee* |
|
Compensation
Committee† |
|
Nominations
and Governance
Committee |
|
Public Policy
Committee |
|
Executive
Committee |
|
Robert J. Alpern, M.D. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Roxanne S. Austin |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
Sally E. Blount, Ph.D. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Robert B. Ford |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Paola Gonzalez |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michelle A. Kumbier |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Darren W. McDew |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Nancy McKinstry |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
William A. Osborn |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
Michael F. Roman |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel J. Starks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
John G. Stratton |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Glenn F. Tilton |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Total Meetings Held in 2021 |
|
7 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
4 |
|
0 |
|
 |
Chair |
 |
Member |
* |
Each of the committee members is financially literate, as is
required of audit committee members by the New York Stock Exchange.
The Board of Directors has determined that Nancy McKinstry is an
“audit committee financial expert.” |
† |
Ms.
Austin is not standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting. The
Board of Directors will appoint a new Compensation Committee chair
upon conclusion of her tenure at the Annual Meeting. |
|
|
 |
21 |
Table of
Contents
AUDIT
COMMITTEE
The Audit
Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its
oversight responsibility with respect to:
|
● |
Abbott’s accounting and financial reporting practices and the audit
process, |
|
● |
The
quality and integrity of Abbott’s financial statements, |
|
● |
The
independent auditors’ qualifications, independence, and
performance, |
|
● |
The
performance of Abbott’s internal audit function and internal
auditors, |
|
● |
Legal and regulatory compliance relating to financial matters,
including accounting, auditing, financial reporting, and securities
law issues, and |
|
● |
Enterprise risk
management, including major financial and cybersecurity risk
exposures. |
In performing
these functions, the Audit Committee meets regularly with the
independent auditor, Abbott’s management, and Abbott’s internal
auditors to review the adequacy, effectiveness and quality of
Abbott’s accounting and financial reporting principles, policies,
procedures and controls, as well as Abbott’s enterprise risk
management, including Abbott’s risk assessment and risk management
policies. The Audit Committee also receives regular reports from
management on Abbott’s information security and enterprise
cybersecurity risk programs.
A copy of the
report of the Audit Committee is on page 70.
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE
The Compensation
Committee assists the Board of Directors in carrying out the
Board’s responsibilities relating to the compensation of Abbott’s
executive officers and directors. Its primary responsibilities
include:
|
● |
Review, approve, and administer the incentive compensation plans in
which any executive officer participates and all of Abbott’s
equity-based plans. The Compensation Committee may delegate the
responsibility to administer and make grants under these plans to
management, except to the extent that such delegation would be
inconsistent with applicable law or regulation or with the listing
rules of the New York Stock Exchange. |
|
● |
Review director compensation annually and recommend to the full
Board both the amount and the allocation between equity-based
awards and cash. In recommending director compensation, the
Compensation Committee takes comparable director fees into account
and reviews any arrangement that could be viewed as indirect
director compensation. |
|
● |
Engage compensation consultants to provide counsel and advice on
executive and non-employee director compensation matters. The
consultant and its principal report directly to the Chair of the
Committee. The principal meets regularly and as needed with the
Committee in executive sessions, has direct access to the Chair
during and between meetings, and performs no other services for
Abbott or its senior executives. |
|
|
The Committee
determines what variables it will instruct the consultant to
consider, including peer groups against which performance and pay
should be examined, financial metrics to be used to assess Abbott’s
relative performance, competitive incentive practices in the
marketplace, and compensation levels relative to market practice.
The Committee negotiates and approves any fees paid to the
consultant for these services. |
The Compensation
Committee engaged Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC as its
compensation consultant for 2021. Meridian performs no other work
for Abbott. Based on its evaluation of Meridian’s independence in
accordance with the New York Stock Exchange listing standards and
information provided by Meridian, the Committee determined that the
work performed by Meridian does not present any conflicts of
interest.
A copy of the
report of the Compensation Committee is on page 51.
22 |
 |
Table of
Contents
NOMINATIONS
AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
The Nominations
and Governance Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its
oversight responsibility with respect to governance matters. Its
primary responsibilities include:
|
● |
Assist the Board in identifying individuals qualified to become
Board members, and recommend to the Board the nominees for election
as directors at the next annual meeting of shareholders, |
|
● |
Recommend to the Board the people to be elected as executive
officers of Abbott, |
|
● |
Develop and recommend to the Board the corporate governance
guidelines applicable to Abbott, and |
|
● |
Serve in an
advisory capacity to the Board and the Chairman of the Board on
matters of organization, management succession plans, major changes
in the organizational structure of Abbott, and the conduct of Board
activities. |
The process used
by this Committee to identify a nominee to serve as a member of the
Board of Directors depends on the qualities being sought. From time
to time, Abbott engages an executive search firm to assist the
Committee in identifying individuals qualified to be Board members.
The process used by the Committee to identify nominees is described
on page 19 in the section captioned, “Director Selection.”
PUBLIC POLICY
COMMITTEE
The Public
Policy Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its
oversight responsibility with respect to:
|
● |
Legal, regulatory, and healthcare compliance matters, including
evaluating Abbott’s compliance policies and practices and reviewing
Abbott’s compliance program, |
|
● |
Product quality and cybersecurity matters, |
|
● |
Governmental affairs and political participation, including
advocacy priorities, political contributions, lobbying activities,
and trade association memberships, |
|
● |
Sustainability and social responsibility policies and practices,
and |
|
● |
Social,
political, economic, and environmental trends and public policy
issues that affect or could affect Abbott’s business activities,
performance, and public image. |
EXECUTIVE
COMMITTEE
The Executive
Committee may exercise all the authority of the Board in the
management of Abbott, except for matters expressly reserved by law
for Board action.
 |
23 |
Table of
Contents
Active shareholder engagement throughout the year is essential to
maintaining good corporate governance. We routinely seek investor
input on a variety of topics, including corporate governance,
executive compensation, sustainability and other strategic matters.
During 2021, we met or initiated contact with shareholders
representing over 60% of our outstanding shares, including 100% of
our top 20 investors, in an open dialogue to discuss our
compensation program and other topics. Investor sentiment and
specific feedback was shared with executive management and the
Board of Directors, as appropriate.
Topics discussed with our investors included:
|
● |
The
pandemic’s impact on our business, our COVID-19 testing response,
and the strength and resilience of our diversified business
model. |
|
● |
Business
and sustainability strategy, including Abbott’s new 2030
Sustainability Plan and its focus on creating new life-changing
technologies and products, expanding access and affordability of
new product innovations and advancing health equity. |
|
● |
Human
capital management and Abbott’s commitment to diversity, equity,
and inclusion,including Abbott’s new Diversity, Equity and
Inclusion Report which provides goals, our progress against them,
and disclosure of EEO-1 data. |
|
● |
Board
composition and refreshment, including the addition of four new
independent directors since 2018, three of whom are women and/or
minorities. |
|
● |
Executive compensation program, including Abbott’s continued
enhanced compensation disclosure. |
Each year, Abbott’s directors evaluate the effectiveness of the
Board and its Committees in performing its governance and risk
oversight responsibilities. Directors assess the performance of
their peers, as well as the full Board of Directors and each of the
Committees on which they serve, as follows:

PEER, BOARD, AND COMMITTEE EVALUATIONS
Written evaluations solicit feedback on the performance of:
Each individual director,
including: |
|
The full Board and Board Committees,
including: |
● Independent thinking and action
● Contributions to discussions and decisions
|
|
● Ethical standards and values
● Professional competence in matters of oversight and
governance
|
|
● Structure and composition
● Effectiveness of oversight and other
responsibilities
|
|
● Encouragement of open communication and differing
viewpoints
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COLLECTION AND REVIEW OF
RESULTS |
INCORPORATION OF
FEEDBACK |
|
|
To ensure candid feedback, directors
submit their evaluation responses to an independent third party,
who anonymizes all responses and compiles them into reports for the
Board and Committees.
The Nominations and Governance Committee reviews the peer and full
Board reports, and each Committee reviews its respective report.
All evaluation responses are shared with the full
Board. |
Feedback requiring additional
consideration is addressed at subsequent Board and Committee
meetings, and opportunities for additional enhancements are
identified, considered and implemented as appropriate.
The Chair of the Nominations and Governance Committee discusses
peer evaluation results with individual directors as
needed. |
|
|
24 |
 |
Table of
Contents
COMMUNICATING WITH
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS |
Interested parties may communicate with the Board of Directors by
writing a letter to the Chairman of the Board, to the Chair of the
Nominations and Governance Committee, who acts as the lead
independent director, or to the independent directors c/o Abbott
Laboratories, 100 Abbott Park Road, D-364, AP6D, Abbott Park,
Illinois 60064, Attention: Corporate Secretary. The General Counsel
and Corporate Secretary regularly forwards to the addressee all
letters other than mass mailings, advertisements, and other
materials not relevant to Abbott’s business. In addition, directors
regularly receive a log of all correspondence received by Abbott
that is addressed to a member of the Board and may request any
correspondence on that log.
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE MATERIALS |
Abbott’s corporate governance guidelines, outline of directorship
qualifications, director independence standards, code of business
conduct, and the charters of Abbott’s Audit Committee, Compensation
Committee, Nominations and Governance Committee, and Public Policy
Committee are all available in the corporate governance section of
Abbott’s investor relations website (www.abbottinvestor.com).
|
|
 |
25 |
Table of
Contents
Mr. Ford is not compensated for serving on the Board or Board
committees. Mr. White was not compensated for serving on the Board
or Board committees during his tenure as Executive Chairman of the
Board. Abbott’s remaining directors, who are all non-employee
directors, are compensated for their service under the Abbott
Laboratories Non-Employee Directors’ Fee Plan and the Abbott
Laboratories 2017 Incentive Stock Program.
The following table sets forth a summary of the non-employee
directors’ 2021 compensation.
Name |
|
Fees
Earned
or Paid in Cash
($)(1) |
|
Stock
Awards
($)(2) |
|
Option
Awards
($)(3) |
|
Change
in
Pension Value
and Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(4) |
|
All
Other
Compensation
($)(5) |
|
Total
($) |
R. J. Alpern |
|
$ 126,000 |
|
$184,944 |
|
$0 |
|
$53,408 |
|
$25,000 |
|
$389,352 |
R. S. Austin |
|
146,000 |
|
184,944 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
25,000 |
|
355,944 |
S. E. Blount |
|
126,000 |
|
184,944 |
|
0 |
|
7,590 |
|
25,000 |
|
343,534 |
P. Gonzalez |
|
43,500 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
43,500 |
M. A. Kumbier |
|
132,000 |
|
184,944 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
316,944 |
E. M. Liddy |
|
50,333 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
50,333 |
D. W. McDew |
|
126,000 |
|
184,944 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
310,944 |
N. McKinstry |
|
144,667 |
|
184,944 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
5,000 |
|
334,611 |
P. N. Novakovic |
|
47,000 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
47,000 |
W. A. Osborn |
|
156,000 |
|
184,944 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
340,944 |
M. F. Roman |
|
88,000 |
|
184,944 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
272,944 |
D. J. Starks |
|
126,000 |
|
184,944 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
310,944 |
J. G. Stratton |
|
132,000 |
|
184,944 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
316,944 |
G. F. Tilton |
|
142,000 |
|
184,944 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
25,000 |
|
351,944 |
(1) |
Under the Abbott
Laboratories Non-Employee Directors’ Fee Plan, non-employee
directors earn $10,500 for each month of service as a director.
Audit Committee members, other than the Audit Committee chair,
receive $500 for each month of service on the Audit Committee.
Board Committee chairs receive monthly fees of: $2,083.33 for the
Audit Committee chair, $1,666.66 for the Compensation Committee
chair, $1,250.00 for the Public Policy Committee chair, and
$1,250.00 for the chair of any other Board committee. In addition,
the lead independent director earns $2,500 for each month of such
service and does not receive a fee for service as Nominations and
Governance Committee chair. Fees earned under the Abbott
Laboratories Non-Employee Directors’ Fee Plan are paid in cash to
the director, paid in the form of vested non-qualified stock
options (based on an independent appraisal of their fair value),
deferred (as a non-funded obligation of Abbott), or paid currently
into an individual grantor trust established by the director. The
distribution of deferred fees and amounts held in a director’s
grantor trust generally commences when the director reaches age 65,
or upon retirement from the Board of Directors, if later. The
director may elect to have deferred fees and fees deposited in
trust credited to either a guaranteed interest account or to a
stock equivalent account that earns the same return as if the fees
were invested in Abbott shares. If necessary, Abbott contributes
funds to a director’s trust so that as of year-end the stock
equivalent account balance (net of taxes) is not less than
seventy-five percent of the market value of the related common
shares at year-end. |
|
|
26 |
 |
Table of
Contents
(2) |
The
amounts reported in this column represent the aggregate grant date
fair value of the awards calculated in accordance with Financial
Accounting Standards Board ASC Topic 718. Abbott determines the
grant date fair value of stock unit awards by multiplying the
number of restricted stock units granted by the average of the high
and low market prices of an Abbott common share on the date of
grant. In addition to the fees described in footnote 1, each
non-employee director elected to the Board of Directors at the
annual shareholders meeting receives vested restricted stock units
having a value of $185,000 (rounded down) under the Abbott
Laboratories 2017 Incentive Stock Program). In 2021, this was 1,499
units. The non-employee directors receive cash payments equal to
the dividends paid on the shares covered by the units at the same
rate as other shareholders. Upon termination, retirement from the
Board, death, or a change in control of Abbott, a non-employee
director will receive one common share for each restricted stock
unit outstanding under the Incentive Stock Program. Each director
is required to own, within five years of becoming a director, the
number of Abbott shares having a fair market value equal to five
times the annual director fees earned or paid in cash. All
directors with five years tenure or more meet or exceed the
guidelines. The following Abbott restricted stock units were
outstanding as of December 31, 2021: R. J. Alpern, 33,879; R. S.
Austin, 41,542; S. E. Blount, 27,139; M. A. Kumbier, 5,714; D. W.
McDew, 3,473; N. McKinstry, 27,139; W. A. Osborn, 35,796; M. F.
Roman, 1,499; D. J. Starks, 12,096; J. G. Stratton, 8,659; and G.
F. Tilton, 37,526. |
(3) |
The
following options were outstanding as of December 31, 2021: R. S.
Austin, 64,718; E. M. Liddy, 58,861; N. McKinstry, 63,391; P. N.
Novakovic, 81,381; and W. A. Osborn, 29,567. |
(4) |
The
totals in this column include reportable interest credited under
Abbott Laboratories Non-Employee Directors’ Fee Plan during the
year. |
(5) |
Charitable
contributions made by Abbott’s non-employee directors are eligible
for a matching contribution (up to $25,000 annually). The amounts
reported in this column represent charitable matching grant
contributions. |
|
|
 |
27 |
Table of
Contents
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS |
INTRODUCTION
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) describes
Abbott’s executive compensation program in 2021. In particular,
this CD&A explains how the Compensation Committee (the
Committee) and Board of Directors made compensation decisions for
the Company’s executives, including the six named officers: Robert
B. Ford, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
effective December 10, 2021 (previously President and Chief
Executive Officer); Robert E. Funck, Jr., Executive Vice President,
Finance and Chief Financial Officer; Hubert L. Allen, Executive
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary; Daniel G. Salvadori,
Executive Vice President and Group President, Established
Pharmaceuticals and Nutritional Products effective December 1, 2021
(previously Executive Vice President, Nutritional Products); Andrea
F. Wainer, Executive Vice President, Rapid and Molecular
Diagnostics; and Miles D. White, Former Executive Chairman of the
Board.
The CD&A also describes the process the Committee utilizes to
examine performance in the context of executive pay decisions, the
performance goals and results for each named officer, and recent
updates to our compensation program. This year’s CD&A reflects
the feedback from our shareholders gathered during our 2021
shareholder outreach described on page 29.
VALUE CREATION FOR SHAREHOLDERS
Abbott’s sustained strong performance has resulted in total
shareholder return (TSR) exceeding the peer median and major market
indices on a one, three-, and five-year basis.
Abbott’s three-year TSR of 104% is
more than twice that of the peer group median, and Abbott’s
five-year TSR of 300% is more than four times that of the peer
median. These consistent
top-tier returns are driven by strong execution, an effective
governance structure, and the strength of our diversified business
model with leadership positions in some of the largest and fastest
growing markets in healthcare and innovative product portfolios
across our businesses.
Abbott delivered strong returns
for shareholders in 2021, despite the continued global impact and
uncertainty of COVID 19, and exceeded the financial targets that
were set at the beginning of the year. Abbott’s one-year TSR was 31%, more than two and
a half times the peer median TSR, a testament to the strength of
our diversified business model and ability to innovate and deliver
in this challenging environment.

|
|
28 |
 |
Table of
Contents
CHANGES BASED ON SHAREHOLDER FEEDBACK AND MARKET
PRACTICES |
In 2021, we met or initiated contact
with shareholders representing over 60% of our outstanding shares,
including 100% of our top 20 investors in an open dialogue to
discuss our compensation program and various topics,
including:
|
● |
The pandemic’s impact on our business, our COVID-19 testing
response, and the strength and resilience of our diversified
business model. |
|
● |
Business and
sustainability strategy, including Abbott’s new 2030 Sustainability
Plan and its focus on creating new life-changing technologies
and products, expanding access and affordability of new
product innovations and advancing health
equity. |
|
● |
Human capital management
and Abbott’s commitment to diversity, equity, and
inclusion, including Abbott’s new Diversity, Equity and
Inclusion Report which provides goals, our progress against them,
and disclosure of EEO-1 data. |
|
● |
Board composition and
refreshment, including the addition of four new independent
directors since 2018, three of whom are women and/or
minorities. |
|
● |
Executive compensation program,
including Abbott’s continued enhanced compensation
disclosure. |
Their feedback was overwhelmingly positive, which was reflected in
the 92% support for our Say-on-Pay Proposal.
As illustrated in the table below, over the past several years we
have made numerous changes to our program and our proxy statement
based on feedback from our shareholders as well as a review of
market practices.
CHANGES
BASED ON SHAREHOLDER FEEDBACK
|
● Increased disclosure related to Abbott’s 2030
Sustainability Plan goals and linkage to executive pay
● Revised annual cash incentive plan goals and
weighting
● Significantly increased disclosure related to
payouts for both annual and long term incentives
● Changed performance-based restricted stock
awards to vest only over a 3-year term with no more than one-third
of the award vesting in any one year
|
|
● Introduced new long-term incentive measures to
reflect sustained performance over a three-year period
● Increased director share ownership
guidelines
● Increased the target for vesting of performance
restricted shares
● Updated our peer group to reflect increased
size and complexity of business
● Implemented a strengthened recoupment
policy
|
|
|
 |
29 |
Table of
Contents
ABBOTT’S PEER GROUP FOR PAY AND COMPANY
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKING |
To determine the competitiveness of our compensation and benefit
programs, the Committee, in consultation with its independent
consultant, annually compares the level of compensation, pay
practices, and our relative performance to those of peer companies.
Our Compensation Committee reviewed our peer group in 2021 and
determined that the existing peer group strikes the appropriate
balance between size (revenue and market capitalization between
approximately one-third and three-times Abbott’s), growth and
return profiles, geographic breadth, and management and operating
structure. This approach has been overwhelmingly supported by our
investors during shareholder outreach.
The peer group is summarized below, showing the primary
characteristics for each company selected, including the Abbott
business segment(s) represented by the peer company.
Company
Name |
|
Sales/
Rev.(1)
(billions) |
|
Market
Cap(1)
(billions) |
|
%
Rev.
Outside
U.S. |
|
Similar
#
Employees |
|
Mfg.
Driven/
Consumer-
Facing |
|
Abbott Business Segment(s)/
Characteristics Represented |
3M Company |
|
$35.4 |
|
$102.4 |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
Diagnostics |
Becton Dickinson |
|
$20.2 |
|
$ 71.7 |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
Diagnostics, Medical Devices |
Boston Scientific |
|
$11.5 |
|
$ 60.5 |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
✓ |
|
Medical Devices |
Bristol-Myers Squibb |
|
$45.5 |
|
$138.4 |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
✓ |
|
Established Pharmaceuticals |
Cisco |
|
$50.8 |
|
$267.3 |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
Diagnostics, Medical Devices |
The Coca-Cola Company |
|
$37.8 |
|
$255.8 |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
Consumer |
Danaher Corporation |
|
$29.5 |
|
$235.1 |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
Diagnostics |
Honeywell International |
|
$34.6 |
|
$143.5 |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
Diagnostics, Medical Devices |
Johnson & Johnson |
|
$93.8 |
|
$450.4 |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
Consumer, Diagnostics, Established Pharmaceuticals,
Medical Devices |
Medtronic |
|
$31.8 |
|
$139.1 |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
Medical Devices |
Merck |
|
$49.2 |
|
$193.6 |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
Established Pharmaceuticals |
Mondelez International |
|
$28.7 |
|
$ 92.5 |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
Consumer |
Nike |
|
$46.3 |
|
$263.8 |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
Consumer |
Procter & Gamble |
|
$78.3 |
|
$395.9 |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
Consumer |
Reckitt Benckiser(2) |
|
$24.6 |
|
$ 60.7 |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
✓ |
|
Nutrition |
Stryker Corporation |
|
$17.1 |
|
$100.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
✓ |
|
Medical Devices |
Thermo Fisher Scientific |
|
$39.1 |
|
$262.9 |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
Diagnostics |
Peer Group Median |
|
$35.4 |
|
$143.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abbott |
|
$43.1 |
|
$248.9 |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
|
Abbott Percentile Rank |
|
65th |
|
65th |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Data source: Nasdaq IR
Insight database reflects most recently disclosed (as of
January 31, 2022) trailing 12-month sales/revenue. The market
cap reflects values on December 31, 2021. |
(2) |
Revenue/Market Cap converted to USD
for companies outside the U.S. |
|
|
30 |
 |
Table of
Contents
BASIS
FOR COMPENSATION DECISIONS |
Abbott and its
Compensation Committee have designed a compensation program that
balances short- and long-term objectives to focus our executives on
actions that create value today, while building for sustainable
future success. Approximately 90% of our pay is performance-based,
directly tying a significant portion of executive compensation to
Company performance and shareholder returns.
Our compensation
program is market-based (to ensure our ability to attract
and retain talented executives) and produces compensation outcomes
that are performance-based (to incent the achievement of
profitable growth that increases shareholder value).
COMPENSATION PROGRAM
IS MARKET-BASED
All components of total
direct compensation are market-based. Each year, the Compensation
Committee reviews market data with the independent compensation
consultant to ensure our programs are aligned and our officers are
positioned appropriately relative to the market.
Base
Salary
Base salary targets are
initially set using the median of the peer group as a benchmark.
Base salaries then vary depending on the officer’s experience,
expertise, and performance. The average base salary of our
executive officers is approximately at the market
median.
Annual Incentive
Plan
Annual incentive
targets are initially set using the median of the peer group as a
benchmark. The targets may vary based on other factors, including
internal pay comparisons. Further linkage to the market is achieved
by setting targets that require our officers to exceed the
anticipated growth of the market in which they compete in order to
achieve a target payout of their annual incentives.
Long-Term Incentive
Plan (LTI)
To set annual LTI award
guidelines, the Committee first reviews LTI grants made by peer
companies to identify the competitive market range. Each year the
guidelines are set at the appropriate level within the competitive
market range based on Abbott’s relative performance, as described
on pages 32 and 33. To recognize the continued growth focus of
Abbott and to directly align the interests of executive officers
with the interests of our shareholders, the Compensation Committee
grants long-term incentive awards in the form of 50% stock options
and 50% performance restricted shares. This mix of incentive awards
is consistent with our peers.
COMPENSATION
OUTCOMES ARE PERFORMANCE-BASED
Other than base salary,
which is the smallest component of our executives’ compensation,
all remaining components of Total Direct Compensation (i.e., annual
incentive, performance-based restricted stock awards, and stock
options) are aligned with individual, business segment and Company
performance.
|
|
 |
31 |
Table of
Contents
Annual Incentive
Plan
Payouts are determined
based upon performance relative to annual goals and are capped as a
percentage of consolidated net earnings (CEO cap is 0.15%; other
NEO cap is 0.075%). The following formula summarizes the annual
incentive payout process for officers.
For example:
BASE
SALARY |
|
BONUS
TARGET % |
|
TOTAL
GOAL SCORE |
|
AWARD
PAYOUT |
$525,000 |
x |
90% |
x |
95% |
= |
$448,875 |
For 2021 performance,
annual incentive payouts for Abbott executive officers averaged
101% of target. For individual calculations for each named officer,
see pages 38 to 48. The annual incentive plan is formula driven
based on financial, strategic, talent and succession, and diversity
results. Officer financial goals are based on adjusted financial
measures that reflect the true results of our ongoing operations
and are set based on the expected market growth of the businesses
in the markets in which we compete.
Long-Term Incentive
Plan
Abbott’s process to
determine long-term incentive awards is based on both company and
individual performance. Guidelines are set based on relative
performance of the Company to peers. Those guidelines are adjusted,
up or down, based on individual officer performance over the prior
three years. Performance restricted shares vest only if performance
achieves expectations over the following three years, and stock
options provide value only through share price appreciation.
Conversely, most other companies reflect performance only at the
Company level through future relative TSR. Abbott’s process is much
more rigorous, reflecting both company and individual performance
over a longer period of time.
The Committee positions
LTI award guidelines relative to the market by comparing Abbott’s
3-year TSR performance against our peers. 5- and 1-year TSR
performance are also referenced to ensure long-term performance is
sustained, and current performance is on track with shareholder
expectations.
|
|
32 |
 |
Table of
Contents
For example, guidelines
for grants made in February 2021 were set at the 75th percentile of
our peer group, reflecting 82nd percentile relative 3-, 5-, and
1-year TSR performance for the period ending in 2020, as summarized
in the graphic below.
The
information below represents the February 2021 annual
grant.

STEP 1: Link
to Market
Compare
Abbott’s 3-year TSR performance against our peer group, consider
5-, and 1-year TSR to ensure long-term performance is
sustained
STEP 2: Link
to Company Performance
Position
LTI guideline value relative to peer group
STEP 3: Link
to Individual Performance
Adjust for
individual performance
5-year
relative TSR = 82%
3-year relative TSR =
82%
1-year relative TSR =
82%
2021 LTI
Guideline = 75th
percentile of Peer Group
LTI
LTI Award
guideline adjusted up or down based on individual officer's
sustained 3-year contributions to:
● Sales
and market growth
● Margin
● Strategic
financial measures
The recommendation for
each officer starts with the Company LTI award guideline (based on
relative TSR performance and market data as described above) for
the officer’s position and is adjusted based upon assessment of
their sustained contributions over the last three years.
Contribution scores are totaled and used to adjust each officer’s
award guideline. Final awards may be increased or decreased based
on the long-term impact each individual officer had on the
organization. For example:
SAMPLE
INDIVIDUAL LTI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT |
Metric |
|
2018 |
|
2019 |
|
2020 |
|
Overall |
Sales and
Market Growth Contribution |
|
Met
(0) |
|
Did Not Meet
(-1) |
|
Exceeded
(+1) |
|
0 |
Margin
Contribution |
|
Met
(0) |
|
Met
(0) |
|
Exceeded
(+1) |
|
+1 |
Strategic
Financial Contribution |
|
Met
(0) |
|
Met
(0) |
|
Met
(0) |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
+1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTI
Adjustment |
|
110% |
LTI
ADJUSTMENT LEGEND |
Total |
|
Result |
+4 or
More |
|
125% |
+1 to
+3 |
|
110% |
0 |
|
100% |
-1 or
-2 |
|
90% |
-3 or
Less |
|
75% |
|
|
 |
33 |
Table of
Contents
Awards granted in 2021,
based on individual officer performance for the three-year period
ending in 2020, resulted in awards ranging from the 49th
percentile to the 90th percentile of our peer group. For
individual calculations for each named officer, see pages 38 to
48.
Since stock options
realize value only through share price appreciation, the value
realized upon the exercise of vested stock options directly aligns
the compensation earned with the value shareholders received over
the same period. Options are also aligned with shareholder value
through the impact of relative TSR in determining the LTI award
guidelines.
Performance restricted
shares vest one-third each year only if the Adjusted Return on
Equity (ROE) performance target is achieved. Vesting is
absolute—either 100% or 0%. There is no partial vesting if the
target is missed and no additional vesting upside if the Company
over-performs. The Committee believes Adjusted ROE is the
appropriate performance measure for vesting because ROE measures
how much profit the Company generates over the long-term with the
capital that shareholders have invested and is a measure reflecting
deployment of capital or capital allocation.
In 2021, the
Adjusted ROE vesting target to determine future vesting was
increased from 13% to 14%. This increase follows similar
increases in prior years, which have increased this target 40%
since 2014. This is consistent with our stated intent to increase
our Adjusted ROE targets over time following the separation of
AbbVie, which had a significant impact on our ROE and other return
measures, including Return on Assets (ROA).
Prior to the separation
of Abbott and AbbVie, the AbbVie business accounted for the
majority (65%) of Abbott’s adjusted net income. However, at the
separation of AbbVie, Abbott retained the majority (90%) of the
equity. While Abbott’s ROE was disproportionally lower
following the AbbVie separation, shareholders that retained both
their Abbott and AbbVie shares over the past eight years since the
AbbVie separation would have seen a 322% appreciation in their
holdings.
Impact of Abbott/
AbbVie Separation

|
|
34 |
 |
Table of
Contents
COMPENSATION PROGRAM
IS DIRECTLY LINKED TO BUSINESS STRATEGY
Our compensation
program is also linked directly to our business strategy, to ensure
that officers are focused on those activities that drive our
business strategy and create value for shareholders.
The table below
explains the strategic link of the key metrics used in our annual
and long-term incentive plans.
EVALUATION
OF PERFORMANCE |
METRIC |
|
STRATEGIC
LINK |
Our annual
incentive plan is aligned to the following drivers of shareholder
value: |
Sales |
|
Measures
Abbott’s ability to compete effectively in the markets in which we
participate and focuses management on achieving strong top-line
growth, consistent with our business strategy. |
Diluted
EPS |
|
Measures
Abbott’s ability to deliver profitable growth, contributing to
strong shareholder returns. |
Return on
Assets |
|
Measures
profitability and how effectively Company assets are used to
generate profit. |
Free Cash
Flow |
|
Recognizes
the importance of generating cash to fund ongoing investments in
our business and to pay down debt, pay dividends, and fund
investments outside of capital expenditures. |
Our
long-term incentive plan relies on the following Company metrics,
and 3-year sustained individual performance metrics, to determine
award value: |
Total
Shareholder Return |
|
Measures
Abbott’s stock and dividend performance against our peer group.
Used to position LTI award guidelines relative to the
market. |
3-year LTI
Contribution Metrics |
|
Measures how
each officer has performed relative to their sales, margin, and
strategic financial contribution goals. Used to adjust LTI award
guidelines to reflect individual performance. |
Return on
Equity |
|
Measures how
much profit Abbott generates over the long-term with the capital
that shareholders have invested. Used to determine if
performance-restricted awards vest. |
Officer financial goals
are set and assessed based on adjusted measures that the Committee
believes more accurately reflect the results of our ongoing
operations. We make certain adjustments for specified items,
whether favorable or unfavorable, that are unusual or
unpredictable, such as cost reduction initiatives, restructuring
programs, integration activities and other business
acquisition-related costs, and the impact of significant tax
changes. We also exclude intangible amortization expense to provide
greater visibility on the results of operations excluding these
costs, similar to how Abbott’s management internally assesses
performance.
The Committee believes
these adjusted measures provide a more stable assessment of
Abbott’s core business and encourage decision-making that considers
long-term value. They also align compensation goals with the
financial guidance we communicate to investors, which is also based
on adjusted measures.
|
|
 |
35 |
Table of
Contents
COMPENSATION LINK TO
SUSTAINABILITY
Our leadership covenant
is considered the minimum requirement of being an officer at
Abbott. Any officer that does not fulfill the covenant can receive
a reduction of up to 100% of their annual incentive and/or
long-term incentive awards. In addition, our leadership covenant
specifically states that senior leaders are accountable for the
achievement of Abbott’s 2030 Sustainability Plan goals.
The sustainability plan
is integrated into our business plans, financial planning processes
and existing governance structures. Each senior manager is
responsible for taking actions in their organization that help
achieve our targeted priority goals regarding:
Making
access and affordability core to new product
innovation
This
approach has helped create some of our most successful products,
including FreeStyle Libre®, the world’s most-used
glucose-monitoring system, and our BinaxNOW™ COVID-19 test. In our
rapid diagnostics business, we’re bringing testing closer to the
patient, even in the most remote locations. Importantly, many of
our tests are used at the point of care and provide answers while
the patient is still present, accelerating treatment decisions and
reducing life-threatening delays. Access and affordability are also
core to our Established Pharmaceuticals business strategy, bringing
our high-quality, trusted medicines to emerging markets at
affordable prices.
Transforming
care for chronic disease, malnutrition, and infectious
diseases
In 2021, we
launched the Abbott Malnutrition Solution Center. This internal,
cross-functional innovation hub will help identify, treat and
prevent malnutrition among vulnerable populations. We also launched
the Abbott Pandemic Defense Coalition, a first-of-its-kind global
scientific and public health partnership dedicated to the early
detection of, and rapid response to, future pandemic threats. The
coalition is designed with a comprehensive approach to containing
emerging threats, with partners ranging in expertise from
scientific research, public health and diagnostic testing to attack
new viral threats from all angles. This coalition is in full force
as our scientists are currently monitoring new COVID-19 variants.
We’re collecting and analyzing samples from around the globe to
look for mutations that may impact the function of the virus to
ensure that our tests are able to detect them, aiming to prevent
further spread.
Advancing
health equity through partnership
Abbott and
the American Diabetes Association® launched a
first-of-its-kind community initiative to advance access to
diabetes care and technology. The program launched in Columbus,
Ohio in partnership with the National Center for Urban Solutions
(NCUS). As part of the program, NCUS will provide up to 150
Black adults living with diabetes in
the Columbus community with health education and access
to Abbott’s FreeStyle® Libre flash glucose
monitoring technology. By removing existing barriers to tools and
technology, this program aims to demonstrate how continuous glucose
monitoring can help improve diabetes management and quality of life
for Black people living with diabetes in
the Columbus community.
In addition to these
priority goals, senior leaders will also take actions in key areas,
including:
Protecting
a healthy environment
In 2020, we
implemented 54 energy efficiency and air emissions projects at 28
sites in nine countries. These resulted in more than 30 million kWh
in annual energy savings, preventing more than 8,900 metric tons of
CO2e emissions and delivered more than $1.1 million annual cost
savings.
In 2020, we
also implemented 16 water efficiency and reduction projects at 12
manufacturing and R&D sites across six countries, four of which
are located in water-stressed areas. These projects resulted in
savings of around 14.6 million gallons of water per year and
$120,000.
|
|
36 |
 |
Table of
Contents
Our Zero Waste to
Landfill program provides our sites with a clear target for
diverting waste away from landfills. Thirty-one Abbott
manufacturing facilities and seven nonmanufacturing facilities,
located across 18 countries, have now achieved Zero Waste to
Landfill status.
We set an aggressive
target to reduce the total weight of packaging for Abbott products
by 10% by 2020, when compared with our 2010 baseline. We surpassed
our initial goal and reduced our total weight of packaging by 14.2%
since 2010. In doing so, we eliminated approximately 42.1 million
pounds of packaging and saved more than $100 million.
Building
the diverse, innovative workforce of tomorrow
In 2021,
all of our U.S. employees received unconscious bias training, and
97% of our people managers globally completed “Leading with
Impact”, a development program focused on inclusive leadership. We
published our first ever Diversity, Equity and Inclusion report
which provides goals, our progress against them, and disclosure of
EEO-1 data.
Responsibly
connecting data, technology and care
The NeuroSphere™
Virtual Clinic which offers a telehealth service, from a
patient’s iPhone to their physician’s iPad, but also allows for a
digital prescription to be delivered, near-instantaneously, from
the physician’s iPad to a patient’s brain, over the internet. This
allows doctors to assess patients live, treat them over the
internet, and assess the effects of the treatment, in
real-time, without the patient having to leave
home.
Creating a
resilient, diverse and responsible supply chain
The
COVID-19 pandemic tested the resilience of our supply chain to the
extreme. Working across our business functions, we rose to the
challenge by building an inventory of raw materials and products to
support continuity of supply, monitoring performance more tightly
to identify distressed suppliers early enough to implement
contingency plans, mapping supplier manufacturing sites in known
COVID-19 “hot spots” or in locations affected by government
lockdowns, and offering COVID-19 testing for employees at a few
strategic suppliers to ensure continued operations and
supply.
PAY DECISIONS FOR
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following pages
detail the goals and metrics used to determine each named officer’s
payout under our annual and long-term incentive plans. For some
goals, the target is not disclosed for competitive reasons. The
long-term incentive decisions shown in the Summary Compensation
Table of this proxy statement and detailed here were based upon
performance through 2020, whereas the annual incentive plan payouts
are based upon performance during 2021.
|
|
 |
37 |
Table of
Contents
NAMED
EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION DECISIONS
 |
|
ROBERT B.
FORD
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
Mr. Ford
previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer until
his appointment to the role of Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer on December 10, 2021.
Base
Salary
Mr. Ford’s annual base
salary was increased to $1,500,000 in March 2021 based on
competitive market data among Abbott’s peers.
Annual Incentive
Plan
Mr. Ford’s target bonus
of 175% was not changed in 2021. Based on performance in 2021, Mr.
Ford received a bonus in February 2022 which was calculated as
follows:
GOAL |
2020
RESULTS
ACHIEVED |
GOAL
WEIGHT |
2021
GOAL MEASUREMENT |
2021
RESULTS
ACHIEVED |
GOAL
SCORE |
THRESHOLD |
TARGET |
MAXIMUM |
FINANCIAL
METRICS(1) |
Adjusted Sales(2) |
$34.92B |
25% |
$42.99B |
$43.19B |
$44.20B |
$43.61B |
30.2% |
Adjusted Diluted EPS |
$3.65 |
25% |
$4.93 |
$5.00 |
$5.25 |
$5.21 |
35.5% |
Adjusted ROA |
11.8% |
10% |
14.9% |
15.0% |
15.5% |
15.9% |
15.0% |
Free Cash Flow |
$5.7B |
10% |
$6.9B |
$7.2B |
$7.6B |
$8.6B |
15.0% |
STRATEGIC
METRICS(3) |
COVID-19 Test Sales |
|
10% |
92.9%
of target |
Target |
114.3%
of Target |
108.6%
of Target |
13.1% |
Diabetes Care Sales Growth |
|
10% |
89.1%
of Target |
Target |
108.7%
of Target |
103.3%
of Target |
11.9% |
Core Diagnostics Sales Growth |
|
10% |
89.7%
of Target |
Target |
109.2%
of Target |
Below
Threshold |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
120.7% |
(1) |
Adjusted Sales exclude
the impact of foreign exchange on actual sales relative to the goal
target. Adjusted Diluted EPS is diluted earnings per common share
from continuing operations excluding specified items, such as
intangible amortization expense and various other costs including
expenses related to restructuring actions or business acquisitions.
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA) reflects earnings from continuing
operations, excluding interest expense and specified items.
Adjusted ROA also reflects total assets less current liabilities
excluding short-term borrowings. Free Cash Flow equals Operating
Cash Flow less acquisitions of property and equipment. |
(2) |
Set based on expected market growth
of the businesses and markets in which we compete. To achieve
target payout, must increase market share. |
(3) |
Target not disclosed for competitive reasons. Diabetes Care and
Core Diagnostics Sales Growth exclude the impact of foreign
exchange. |
BASE
SALARY |
|
BONUS
TARGET % |
|
TOTAL
GOAL SCORE |
|
AWARD
PAYOUT |
$1,500,000 |
× |
175% |
× |
120.7% |
= |
$3,168,400 |
|
|
38 |
 |
Table of
Contents
Long-Term
Incentives
Based on the Committee’s
review of Abbott and individual performance through 2020,
Mr. Ford received an LTI award in February 2021 with a value
of $17,380,000, which was 110% of the market value equity award for
a CEO in Abbott’s peer group. This award was paid 50% in stock
options(1) and 50% in performance restricted
shares(2).
LTI
AWARD
GUIDELINE |
|
LTI
ADJUSTMENT |
|
AWARD
ALLOCATION |
|
AWARD
VALUE |
$15,800,000 |
× |
110% |
× |
50% Stock Options(1) |
= |
$8,690,000 |
50% Performance Restricted Shares(2) |
$8,690,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$17,380,000 |
INDIVIDUAL
LTI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT |
METRIC |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
OVERALL |
Sales and Market Growth Contribution |
Exceeded (+1) |
Exceeded (+1) |
Exceeded (+1) |
+3 |
Margin Contribution |
Exceeded (+1) |
Exceeded (+1) |
Exceeded (+1) |
+3 |
Strategic Financial Contribution |
Met (0) |
Did Not Meet (-1) |
Exceeded (+1) |
0 |
|
Total |
+6 |
Preliminary Adjustment |
125% |
Impact(3) |
- |
LTI Adjustment |
110% |
LTI
ADJUSTMENT LEGEND |
PRELIMINARY
ADJUSTMENT |
IMPACT |
TOTAL |
RESULT |
IMPACT ON
BUSINESS
PRIORITIES |
SCORE |
RESULT |
+4 or More |
125% |
High Impact |
++ |
+25% or More |
+1 to +3 |
110% |
Medium/High Impact |
+ |
Up to +25% |
0 |
100% |
Medium Impact |
= |
0% |
-1 or -2 |
90% |
Medium/Low Impact |
- |
Up to -25% |
-3 or Less |
75% |
Low Impact |
-- |
-25% or More |
(1) |
Stock options realize
value only through share price appreciation. |
(2) |
Performance restricted shares vest
only if the 14% Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE) performance target
is achieved. |
(3) |
Individual LTI performance assessment
was based upon Mr. Ford’s roles as Chief Operating Officer through
March 31, 2020 and as President and Chief Executive Officer
thereafter. |
 |
39 |
Table of
Contents
 |
|
ROBERT E.
FUNCK, JR
Executive Vice President,
Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
Base
Salary
Mr. Funck’s annual base
salary of $825,000 did not change in 2021.
Annual Incentive
Plan
Mr. Funck’s target bonus
of 115% was not changed in 2021. Based on performance in 2021, Mr.
Funck received a bonus in February 2022 which was calculated as
follows:
GOAL |
2020
RESULTS
ACHIEVED |
GOAL
WEIGHT |
2021
GOAL MEASUREMENT |
2021
RESULTS
ACHIEVED |
GOAL
SCORE |
THRESHOLD |
TARGET |
MAXIMUM |
FINANCIAL
METRICS(1) |
Adjusted Sales(2) |
$34.92B |
10% |
$42.99B |
$43.19B |
$44.20B |
$43.61B |
12.1% |
Adjusted Diluted EPS |
$3.65 |
20% |
$4.93 |
$5.00 |
$5.25 |
$5.21 |
28.4% |
Free Cash Flow |
$5.7B |
10% |
$6.9B |
$7.2B |
$7.6B |
$8.6B |
15.0% |
Achieve Key Treasury and Tax Metrics(3) |
Achieved |
15% |
Target |
Target |
Target |
Achieved |
15.0% |
STRATEGIC
METRICS(3) |
Goal (10% weight): Execute milestones related to data asset
management
Result: Achieved |
10.0% |
Goal (10% weight): Implement a global guided buying
platform
Result: Partially Achieved |
5.0% |
Goal (10% weight): Implement key financial systems
implementations within select countries
Result: Achieved |
10.0% |
HUMAN CAPITAL
METRICS |
Goal (15% weight): Meet talent, succession planning, and
diversity targets.
Result: Achieved |
|
15.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
110.5% |
(1) |
Adjusted Sales exclude the
impact of foreign exchange on actual sales relative to the goal
target. Adjusted Diluted EPS is diluted earnings per common share
from continuing operations excluding specified items. Free Cash
Flow equals Operating Cash Flow less acquisitions of property and
equipment. |
(2) |
Set based on expected market growth of
the businesses and markets in which we compete. To achieve target
payout, must increase market share |
(3) |
Target not disclosed for competitive
reasons. |
BASE
SALARY |
|
BONUS
TARGET % |
|
TOTAL
GOAL SCORE |
|
AWARD
PAYOUT |
$825,000 |
× |
115% |
× |
110.5% |
= |
$1,048,400 |
|
|
40 |
 |
Table of
Contents
Long-Term
Incentives
Based on the Committee’s
review of Abbott and individual performance through 2020,
Mr. Funck received an LTI award in February 2021 with a
value of $6,000,000, which was equal to 113.2% of the market value
equity award for a CFO in Abbott’s peer group. Additional
calculation details are as follows:
LTI
AWARD
GUIDELINE |
|
LTI
ADJUSTMENT |
|
AWARD
ALLOCATION |
|
AWARD
VALUE |
$5,300,000 |
× |
113.2% |
× |
50% Stock Options(1) |
= |
$3,000,000 |
50% Performance Restricted Shares(2) |
$3,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$6,000,000 |
INDIVIDUAL
LTI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT |
METRIC |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
OVERALL |
Sales and Market Growth Contribution |
Exceeded (+1) |
Exceeded (+1) |
Exceeded (+1) |
+3 |
Margin Contribution |
Exceeded (+1) |
Exceeded (+1) |
Exceeded (+1) |
+3 |
Strategic Financial Contribution |
Met (0) |
Met (0) |
Exceeded (+1) |
+1 |
|
Total |
+7 |
Preliminary Adjustment |
125% |
Impact(3) |
- |
LTI Adjustment |
113.2% |
LTI
ADJUSTMENT LEGEND |
PRELIMINARY
ADJUSTMENT |
IMPACT |
TOTAL |
RESULT |
IMPACT ON
BUSINESS
PRIORITIES |
SCORE |
RESULT |
+4 or More |
125% |
High Impact |
++ |
+25% or More |
+1 to +3 |
110% |
Medium/High Impact |
+ |
Up to +25% |
0 |
100% |
Medium Impact |
= |
0% |
-1 or -2 |
90% |
Medium/Low Impact |
- |
Up to -25% |
-3 or Less |
75% |
Low Impact |
-- |
-25% or More |
(1) |
Stock options realize
value only through share price appreciation. |
(2) |
Performance restricted shares vest
only if the 14% Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE) performance target
is achieved. |
(3) |
Individual LTI performance assessment
was based upon Mr. Funck’s roles as Senior Vice President, Finance
and Controller through February 29, 2020 and as Executive Vice
President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer thereafter. |
|
|
 |
41 |
Table of
Contents
 |
|
HUBERT L.
ALLEN
Executive Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary
|
|
|
|
Base
Salary
Mr. Allen’s annual base
salary of $760,000 did not change in 2021.
Annual Incentive
Plan
Mr. Allen’s target bonus
of 105% was not changed in 2021. Based on performance in 2021, Mr.
Allen received a bonus in February 2022 which was calculated as
follows:
GOAL |
2020
RESULTS
ACHIEVED |
GOAL
WEIGHT |
2021
GOAL MEASUREMENT |
2021
RESULTS
ACHIEVED |
GOAL
SCORE |
THRESHOLD |
TARGET |
MAXIMUM |
FINANCIAL
METRICS(1) |
Adjusted Sales(2) |
$34.92B |
10% |
$42.99B |
$43.19B |
$44.20B |
$43.61B |
12.1% |
Adjusted Diluted EPS |
$3.65 |
20% |
$4.93 |
$5.00 |
$5.25 |
$5.21 |
28.4% |
Free Cash Flow |
$5.7B |
10% |
$6.9B |
$7.2B |
$7.6B |
$8.6B |
15.0% |
Other Financial Returns(3) |
Achieved |
10% |
Target |
Target |
Target |
Achieved |
10.0% |
STRATEGIC
METRICS |
Goal (35% weight): Resolve certain key litigation matters
and investigations.
Result: Achieved |
35.0% |
HUMAN CAPITAL
METRICS |
Goal (15% weight): Meet talent, succession planning, and
diversity targets.
Result: Achieved |
|
15.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
115.5% |
(1) |
Adjusted Sales exclude the
impact of foreign exchange on actual sales relative to the goal
target. Adjusted Diluted EPS is diluted earnings per common share
from continuing operations excluding specified items. Free Cash
Flow equals Operating Cash Flow less acquisitions of property and
equipment. |
(2) |
Set based on expected market growth of
the businesses and markets in which we compete. To achieve target
payout, must increase market share |
(3) |
Target not disclosed for competitive
reasons. |
BASE
SALARY |
|
BONUS
TARGET % |
|
TOTAL
GOAL SCORE |
|
AWARD
PAYOUT |
$760,000 |
× |
105% |
× |
115.5% |
= |
$921,700 |
|
|
42 |
 |
Table of
Contents
Long-Term
Incentives
Based on the Committee’s
review of Abbott and individual performance through 2020,
Mr. Allen received an LTI award in February 2021 with a
value of $4,231,250, which was equal to 125% of his LTI award
guideline. Additional calculation details are as
follows:
LTI
AWARD
GUIDELINE |
|
LTI
ADJUSTMENT |
|
AWARD
ALLOCATION |
|
AWARD
VALUE |
$3,385,000 |
× |
125% |
× |
50% Stock Options(1) |
= |
$2,115,625 |
50% Performance Restricted Shares(2) |
$2,115,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$4,231,250 |
INDIVIDUAL
LTI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT |
METRIC |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
OVERALL |
Sales and Market Growth Contribution |
Exceeded (+1) |
Exceeded (+1) |
Exceeded (+1) |
+3 |
Margin Contribution |
Exceeded (+1) |
Exceeded (+1) |
Exceeded (+1) |
+3 |
Strategic Financial Contribution |
Met (0) |
Met (0) |
Met (0) |
0 |
|
Total |
+6 |
LTI Adjustment |
125% |
LTI
ADJUSTMENT LEGEND |
TOTAL |
RESULT |
+4 or More |
125% |
+1 to +3 |
110% |
0 |
100% |
-1 or -2 |
90% |
-3 or Less |
75% |
(1) |
Stock options realize
value only through share price appreciation. |
(2) |
Performance restricted shares vest
only if the 14% Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE) performance target
is achieved. |
 |
43 |
Table of
Contents
 |
|
DANIEL G.
SALVADORI
Executive Vice President
and Group President, Established Pharmaceuticals and Nutritional
Products
|
|
|
|
Mr. Salvadori
previously served as Executive Vice President, Nutritional
Products. Mr. Salvadori was appointed to the role of Executive Vice
President and Group President, Established Pharmaceuticals and
Nutritional Products effective December 1, 2021.
Base
Salary
Mr. Salvadori’s annual
base salary was increased in December 2021 to $790,000 in
connection with his promotion to Executive Vice President and Group
President, Established Pharmaceuticals and Nutritional
Products.
Annual Incentive
Plan
Mr. Salvadori’s target
bonus of 115% was not changed in 2021. Based on performance in
2021, Mr. Salvadori received a bonus in February 2022 which was
calculated as follows:
|
2020
RESULTS |
GOAL |
2021 GOAL MEASUREMENT |
2021
RESULTS |
GOAL |
GOAL |
ACHIEVED |
WEIGHT |
THRESHOLD |
TARGET |
MAXIMUM |
ACHIEVED |
SCORE |
FINANCIAL METRICS(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
Division Net Sales(2) |
$7.68B |
20% |
$7.79B |
$7.88B |
$7.98B |
$8.14B |
30.0% |
Adjusted
Division Margin(3) |
— |
20% |
Target |
Target |
103.6%
of Target |
102.6%
of Target |
27.2% |
Adjusted
Division Gross Margin(3) |
— |
5% |
99.4%
of Target |
Target |
103.8%
of Target |
97.3%
of Target |
0% |
Gross
Margin Improvement(3) |
|
5% |
Target |
Target |
110.0%
of Target |
101.2%
of Target |
5.3% |
Market
Share(3) |
— |
10% |
Target |
Target |
Target |
Mostly
Achieved |
7.5% |
Adjusted
Division Free Cash Flow(3) |
— |
5% |
Target |
Target |
102.4%
of Target |
108.4%
of Target |
7.5% |
Cash
Conversion Cycle(3) |
— |
5% |
5 days
over Target |
Target |
Target |
2 days
under Target |
5.0% |
STRATEGIC METRICS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goal (20%
weight): Complete all commercialization milestones and
implement key capital projects.
Result: Achieved |
|
20.0% |
HUMAN CAPITAL METRICS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goal (10%
weight): Meet talent, succession planning, and diversity
targets.
Result: Achieved |
|
10.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
112.5
% |
(1) |
Adjusted
Division Net Sales exclude the impact of foreign exchange on actual
Nutrition sales relative to the goal target. Adjusted Division
Margin and Adjusted Division Gross Margin exclude the impact of
foreign exchange on actual Nutrition division margin and gross
margin relative to the respective goal target. Adjusted Division
Free Cash Flow reflects Nutrition’s pre-tax operating cash flow
less capital expenditures and excludes the impact of foreign
exchange. |
(2) |
Set
based on expected growth in Nutrition market. To achieve target
payout, must increase market share |
(3) |
Target
not disclosed for competitive reasons. |
|
|
BASE
SALARY |
|
BONUS
TARGET % |
|
TOTAL
GOAL SCORE |
|
AWARD
PAYOUT |
$715,539 |
× |
115% |
× |
112.5% |
= |
$925,700 |
|
|
44 |
 |
Table of
Contents
Long-Term
Incentives
Based on the Committee’s
review of Abbott and individual performance through 2020,
Mr. Salvadori received an LTI award in February 2021 with a
value of $4,777,500, which was equal to 125% of his LTI award
guideline. Additional calculation details are as
follows:
LTI AWARD
GUIDELINE |
|
LTI ADJUSTMENT |
|
AWARD ALLOCATION |
|
AWARD
VALUE |
$3,822,000 |
× |
125% |
× |
50% Stock Options(1) |
= |
$2,388,750 |
50% Performance Restricted Shares(2) |
$2,388,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$4,777,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INDIVIDUAL
LTI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT |
METRIC |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
OVERALL |
Sales and Market Growth Contribution |
Exceeded (+1) |
Exceeded (+1) |
Exceeded (+1) |
+3 |
Margin Contribution |
Met (0) |
Exceeded (+1) |
Exceeded (+1) |
+2 |
Strategic Financial Contribution |
Met (0) |
Exceeded (+1) |
Did Not Meet (-1) |
0 |
|
Total |
+5 |
LTI Adjustment |
125% |
LTI ADJUSTMENT LEGEND |
TOTAL |
RESULT |
+4 or
More |
125% |
+1 to
+3 |
110% |
0 |
100% |
-1 or
-2 |
90% |
-3 or
Less |
75% |
(1) |
Stock
options realize value only through share price
appreciation. |
(2) |
Performance
restricted shares vest only if the 14% Adjusted Return on Equity
(ROE) performance target is achieved. |
|
|
 |
45 |
Table of
Contents
 |
|
ANDREA F.
WAINER
Executive Vice President,
Rapid and Molecular Diagnostics
|
|
|
|
Base
Salary
Ms. Wainer’s annual base
salary was increased from $650,000 to $710,000 in March
2021.
Annual Incentive
Plan
Ms. Wainer’s target bonus
of 115% was not changed in 2021. Based on performance in 2021, Ms.
Wainer received a bonus in February 2022 which was calculated as
follows:
|
2020
RESULTS |
GOAL |
2021 GOAL MEASUREMENT |
2021
RESULTS |
GOAL |
GOAL |
ACHIEVED |
WEIGHT |
THRESHOLD |
TARGET |
MAXIMUM |
ACHIEVED |
SCORE |
FINANCIAL METRICS(1) |
Adjusted
Division Net Sales(2) |
$6.16B |
20% |
$9.47B |
$9.83B |
$10.85B |
$10.52B |
26.7% |
Adjusted
Division Margin(3) |
— |
20% |
Target |
Target |
120.0%
of Target |
112.2%
of Target |
26.1% |
Adjusted
Division Gross Margin(3) |
— |
5% |
98.1%
of Target |
Target |
120.0%
of Target |
101.3%
of Target |
5.2% |
Gross
Margin Improvement(3) |
|
5% |
Target |
Target |
120.0%
of Target |
Above
Maximum |
7.5% |
Market
Share(3) |
— |
10% |
Target |
Target |
Target |
Achieved |
10.0% |
Adjusted
Division Free Cash Flow(3) |
— |
10% |
Target |
Target |
120.0%
of Target |
114.6%
of Target |
13.6% |
STRATEGIC METRICS |
Goal (20%
weight): Complete the necessary innovation, development, and
expansion metrics per approved plans.
Result:
Mostly Achieved |
15.5% |
HUMAN CAPITAL METRICS |
Goal (10%
weight): Meet talent, succession planning, and diversity
targets.
Result: Mostly Achieved |
9.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
114.1% |
(1) |
Adjusted
Division Net Sales exclude the impact of foreign exchange on actual
Rapid and Molecular Diagnostics sales relative to the goal target.
Adjusted Division Margin and Adjusted Division Gross Margin exclude
the impact of foreign exchange on actual Rapid and Molecular
Diagnostics division margin and gross margin relative to the
respective goal target. Adjusted Division Free Cash Flow reflects
Rapid and Molecular Diagnostics’ pre-tax operating cash flow less
capital expenditures and excludes the impact of foreign exchange.
Given the significant fluctuations in demand for COVID-19
diagnostic tests during the year, Adjusted Division Net Sales
target for 2021 was revised from $12.3 billion to $9.8 billion and
other financial targets were determined based on that sales
target. |
(2) |
Set
based on expected growth in Rapid and Molecular Diagnostics
market. |
(3) |
Target
not disclosed for competitive reasons. |
|
|
BASE
SALARY |
|
BONUS
TARGET % |
|
TOTAL
GOAL SCORE |
|
AWARD
PAYOUT |
$710,000 |
× |
115% |
× |
114.1% |
= |
$931,600 |
|
|
46 |
 |
Table of
Contents
Long-Term
Incentives
Based on the Committee’s
review of Abbott and individual performance through 2020,
Ms. Wainer received an LTI award in February 2021 with a
value of $4,777,500, which was equal to 125% of her LTI award
guideline. Additional calculation details are as
follows:
LTI AWARD
GUIDELINE |
|
LTI ADJUSTMENT |
|
AWARD ALLOCATION |
|
AWARD
VALUE |
$3,822,000 |
× |
125% |
× |
50% Stock Options(1) |
= |
$2,388,750 |
50% Performance Restricted Shares(2) |
$2,388,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$4,777,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INDIVIDUAL
LTI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT |
METRIC |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
OVERALL |
Sales and Market Growth Contribution |
Met (0) |
Did Not Meet (-1) |
Exceeded (+1) |
0 |
Margin Contribution |
Exceeded (+1) |
Did Not Meet (-1) |
Exceeded (+1) |
+1 |
Strategic Financial Contribution |
Met (0) |
Did Not Meet (-1) |
Exceeded (+1) |
0 |
|
Total |
+1 |
Preliminary Adjustment |
110% |
Impact |
+ |
LTI Adjustment |
125% |
LTI ADJUSTMENT LEGEND |
PRELIMINARY ADJUSTMENT |
IMPACT |
TOTAL |
RESULT |
IMPACT ON
BUSINESS
PRIORITIES |
SCORE |
RESULT |
+4 or
More |
125% |
High
Impact |
++ |
+25% or More |
+1 to
+3 |
110% |
Medium/High
Impact |
+ |
Up to
+25% |
0 |
100% |
Medium
Impact |
= |
0% |
-1 or
-2 |
90% |
Medium/Low
Impact |
- |
Up to
-25% |
-3 or
Less |
75% |
Low
Impact |
-- |
-25%
or More |
(1) |
Stock
options realize value only through share price
appreciation. |
(2) |
Performance
restricted shares vest only if the 14% Adjusted Return on Equity
(ROE) performance target is achieved. |
 |
47 |
Table of
Contents
 |
|
MILES D.
WHITE
Former Executive Chairman
of the Board
|
|
|
|
Mr. White retired from
Abbott on December 31, 2021.
Base
Salary
Mr. White had an annual
base salary of $1,900,000.
Long-term
Incentives
Based on the
Committee’s review of Abbott and individual performance through
2020, Mr. White received an LTI award in February 2021
with a value of $11,000,000, which was equal to 110% of his LTI
award guideline. Additional calculation details are as
follows:
LTI AWARD
GUIDELINE |
|
LTI ADJUSTMENT |
|
AWARD ALLOCATION |
|
AWARD
VALUE |
$10,000,000 |
× |
110% |
× |
50% Stock Options(1) |
= |
$5,500,000 |
50% Performance Restricted Shares(2) |
$5,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$11,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INDIVIDUAL
LTI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT |
METRIC |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
OVERALL |
Sales and Market Growth Contribution |
Exceeded (+1) |
Exceeded (+1) |
Exceeded (+1) |
+3 |
Margin Contribution |
Exceeded (+1) |
Exceeded (+1) |
Exceeded (+1) |
+3 |
Strategic Financial Contribution |
Exceeded (+1) |
Met (0) |
Exceeded (+1) |
+2 |
|
Total |
+8 |
Preliminary Adjustment |
125% |
Impact(3) |
- |
LTI Adjustment |
110% |
LTI
ADJUSTMENT LEGEND |
PRELIMINARY ADJUSTMENT |
IMPACT |
TOTAL |
RESULT |
IMPACT ON
BUSINESS
PRIORITIES |
SCORE |
RESULT |
+4 or
More |
125% |
High
Impact |
++ |
+25% or
More |
+1 or
+3 |
110% |
Medium/High
Impact |
+ |
Up to
+25% |
0 |
100% |
Medium
Impact |
= |
0% |
-1 or
-2 |
90% |
Medium/Low
Impact |
- |
Up to
-25% |
-3 or
Less |
75% |
Low
Impact |
-- |
-25% or
More |
(1) |
Stock
options realize value only through share price
appreciation. |
(2) |
Performance
restricted shares vest only if the 14% Adjusted Return on Equity
(ROE) performance target is achieved. |
(3) |
Individual
LTI performance assessment was based upon Mr. White’s roles as
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer through March 31, 2020 and as
Executive Chairman thereafter. |
|
|
48 |
 |
Table of
Contents
BENEFITS AND PERQUISITES
Each of the benefits described below was designed to support the
Company’s objective of providing a competitive total pay program.
Individual benefits do not directly affect decisions regarding
other benefits or pay components, except to the extent that
benefits and pay components must, in aggregate, be competitive.
BENEFITS AND
PERQUISITES |
|
DESCRIPTION |
Retirement Benefits |
|
The named
officers participate in Abbott-sponsored defined benefit plans: the
Abbott Laboratories Annuity Retirement Plan and the Abbott
Laboratories Supplemental Pension Plan. These plans are described
in greater detail in the “Pension Benefits” section of the
proxy. |
|
|
Since officers’
Supplemental Pension Plan benefits cannot be secured in a manner
similar to qualified plans, which are held in trust, officers
receive an annual cash payment equal to the increase in present
value of their Supplemental Pension Plan benefit. Officers have the
option of depositing these annual payments to an individually
established grantor trust, net of tax withholdings. Deposited
amounts may be credited with the difference between the officers’
actual annual trust earnings and the rate used to calculate trust
funding (currently 8%) while they are employed. Amounts deposited
in the individual trusts are not tax deferred. |
|
|
Officers do not receive tax gross-ups on their grantor trusts. The
manner in which the grantor trust will be distributed to an officer
upon retirement from the Company generally follows the manner
elected by the officer under the Annuity Retirement Plan. Should an
officer (or the officer’s spouse, depending upon the pension
distribution method elected by the officer under the Annuity
Retirement Plan) live beyond the actuarial life expectancy age used
to determine the Supplemental Pension Plan benefit and, therefore,
exhaust the trust balance, the Supplemental Pension Plan benefit
will be paid by the Company. |
Deferred Compensation |
|
Officers of the Company, like all U.S. employees, are eligible to
defer a portion of annual base salary and bonus (in certain cases),
on a pre-tax basis, to the Company’s qualified 401(k) plan, up to
the IRS contribution limits. Officers are also eligible to defer up
to 18% of their base salary, less contributions to the 401(k) plan,
to a non-qualified plan. Unlike other U.S. managers, officers are
not eligible to elect to defer compensation into the Deferred
Compensation Plan. However, up to one hundred percent (100%) of
annual incentive awards earned under the Company’s Performance
Incentive Plan is eligible for deferral to a non-qualified plan.
Officers may defer these amounts to unfunded book accounts or
choose to have the amounts paid in cash on a current basis and
deposited into individually established grantor trusts, net of tax
withholdings. These amounts are credited annually with earnings.
Officers do not receive tax gross-ups on their grantor trusts.
Officers elect the manner in which the assets held in their grantor
trusts will be distributed to them upon retirement or other
separation from the Company. |
|
|
 |
49 |
Table of
Contents
BENEFITS AND
PERQUISITES |
|
DESCRIPTION |
Change in Control Arrangements |
|
Mr. White did not have an Abbott change in control agreement. The
other named officers have Abbott change in control agreements, the
purpose of which is to aid in retention and recruitment, encourage
continued attention and dedication to assigned duties during
periods involving a possible change in control of the Company, and
protect the earned benefits of the officer against adverse changes
resulting from a change in control. The level of payments provided
under the agreements is established to be consistent with market
practices as confirmed by data provided to the Committee by its
independent compensation consultant. These arrangements are
described in greater detail in the “Potential Payments Upon
Termination or Change in Control” section of this proxy. |
Financial Planning |
|
Named officers are eligible to receive up to $10,000 of fees
annually associated with estate planning advice, tax preparation,
and general financial planning. If an officer chooses to utilize
this benefit, fees for services received up to the annual
allocation are paid by the Company and are treated as imputed
income to the officer, who then is responsible for payment of all
taxes due on the fees paid by the Company. |
Company Automobile |
|
Named officers are eligible for use of a Company-leased vehicle,
with a lease term of 50 months. Seventy-five percent (75%) of
the cost of the vehicle is imputed to the officer as income for
federal income tax purposes. |
Company Aircraft |
|
Non-business-related flights on corporate aircraft by Messrs. Ford
and White are covered by time-sharing lease agreements, pursuant to
which incremental costs associated with those flights are
reimbursed by the executive to the Company in accordance with
Federal Aviation Administration regulations. |
Disability Benefit |
|
In addition to Abbott’s standard disability benefits, the U.S.
named officers are eligible for a monthly long-term disability
benefit, which is described in greater detail in the “Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” section of this
proxy. |
SHARE OWNERSHIP AND RETENTION GUIDELINES
To further promote sustained shareholder returns and to ensure the
Company’s executives remain focused on both short- and long-term
objectives, the Company has established share ownership guidelines.
Each officer has five years from the date appointed/elected to
his/her position to achieve the ownership level associated with the
position.
ROLE |
|
GUIDELINE |
Chief Executive Officer |
|
6 times base salary |
Executive Vice Presidents |
|
3 times base salary |
Senior Vice Presidents |
|
3 times base salary |
All other officers |
|
2 times base salary |
Any officer who has not achieved at least 50% of the share
ownership guideline after three years in their current position
will be required to hold 50% of future equity awards until they
meet the ownership guideline. All named officers with 5 years
tenure in their current position meet or exceed the guidelines.
50 |
 |
Table of
Contents
HEDGING
Directors and officers are prohibited from entering into or
engaging in any financial transaction that is designed to reduce
the financial risk associated with owning Abbott shares. These
financial transactions include, but are not limited to, engaging in
short sales, derivative transactions (such as equity swaps,
straddles, puts, or calls), and hedging or monetizing transactions
(such as collars, exchange funds, or prepaid forward variable
contracts) that are linked directly to Abbott stock.
PLEDGING
Directors and officers are prohibited from holding Abbott stock in
a margin account, pledging Abbott stock, or otherwise securing any
of their obligations by assigning Abbott stock as collateral. The
Compensation Committee, or its delegate, may grant an exception
provided that:
|
● |
The director or
officer meets Abbott’s applicable minimum stock ownership
guideline; and |
|
● |
Only Abbott stock
in excess of the applicable minimum stock ownership guideline is
held in the margin account, pledged, or assigned as
collateral. |
RECOUPMENT POLICY
The Compensation Committee has broad discretion to administer and
implement the Company’s policy and seek recoupment of equity or
cash incentive awards if it determines that a senior executive
engaged in misconduct or failed in a supervisory capacity,
resulting in a material violation of law or Abbott policy that
causes significant financial harm to Abbott. The Compensation
Committee may recover incentive compensation awarded to a senior
executive in the prior three years or reduce future awards. The
policy will not affect awards made prior to its effective date or
following a change in control.
COMPLIANCE
The Committee considers the deductibility of executive compensation
in making its compensation decisions, but believes that shareholder
interests are best served by not restricting the Committee’s
discretion and flexibility in crafting compensation programs, even
if such programs may result in certain non-deductible compensation
expenses. Accordingly, Abbott may provide compensation that is not
deductible.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT |
The Compensation Committee of the Board is primarily responsible
for reviewing, approving, and overseeing Abbott’s compensation
plans and practices, and works with management and the Committee’s
independent consultant to establish Abbott’s executive compensation
philosophy and programs. The Committee has reviewed and discussed
the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and has
recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis be included in this proxy statement.
Compensation Committee
R. S. Austin, Chair
M. A. Kumbier
N. McKinstry
W. A. Osborn
M. F. Roman
 |
51 |
Table of
Contents
COMPENSATION RISK ASSESSMENT |
During 2021, Abbott conducted its annual risk assessment of its
compensation policies and plan design practices for employees and
executives. Abbott’s risk assessment is reinforced by Abbott’s
adherence to a number of industry leading best practices,
including:
|
● |
Compensation
Committee chaired by independent, non-employee director |
|
● |
Representation
from the Audit Committee on the Compensation Committee |
|
● |
Review of
executive compensation programs by the Compensation Committee’s
independent consultant |
|
● |
Robust review of
compensation program design elements and key performance
drivers |
|
● |
Detailed
measurement of short- and long-term compensation elements, and
related performance metrics and requirements, to ensure
balance |
|
● |
Review of
Abbott’s historical performance, peer performance and
Board-approved strategic plan and related financial goals to
determine appropriate incentive plan goals |
|
● |
Incorporation of
multiple program requirements that mitigate excessive risk taking
(e.g., recoupment policy, stock ownership and share retention
guidelines, caps on incentive payouts) |
Based on this assessment, Abbott determined its compensation and
benefit programs appropriately align employees’ compensation and
performance without incentivizing risky behaviors. Abbott concluded
that risks arising from compensation policies and practices are not
reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Abbott or
its shareholders.
The following factors were among those considered:
|
● |
Regular training
on code of business conduct and policies and procedures is
mandatory for all employees. |
|
● |
Compensation
structure encourages employees to regard Abbott as a career
employer, to consider the long-term impact of their decisions, and
to align their interests with those of Abbott’s shareholders (e.g.,
equity awards that vest over multi-year periods, ten-year term on
stock options, and retirement plans). |
|
● |
Annual
benchmarking ensures performance achievement and incentive payout
opportunities that are aligned with a peer group that reflects the
size, investment profile, operating characteristics, and employment
and business markets of Abbott. Appropriateness of this group is
assessed annually by the Compensation Committee’s independent
consultant and reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee.
Our selection criteria and peer companies are reported each year to
our shareholders and have received favorable reviews. |
|
● |
Abbott’s annual
incentive plan places an appropriate weighting on earnings
achievement by balancing it with other factors, including key
operational and strategic measures, disclosed to shareholders.
Since earnings are a key component of stock price performance, this
aspect of Abbott’s compensation plan promotes alignment with
shareholder interests without creating duplication across incentive
plans. |
|
● |
Abbott’s long
term incentive plan focuses on longer-term operating performance
and shareholder returns and awards 50% stock options and 50%
performance based restricted stock. In 2021, roughly three-quarters
of named officer total compensation was in the form of long-term
equity incentives that can be earned or vest over multiple
years. |
|
● |
Equity awards are
made, and grant prices are set at the same time each year, at the
Compensation Committee’s regularly scheduled meeting. In addition,
Abbott does not reprice or backdate stock options, award discounted
stock options, or immediately vest stock options or restricted
stock. Equity awards are based on multiple performance factors and
are set at competitive market levels, adjusted by Abbott’s
long-term performance vs. our Board-approved peer group. Both
executive and Director share ownership guidelines and share
retention requirements promote alignment with shareholders. |
|
|
52 |
 |
Table of
Contents
|
● |
Abbott’s
compensation program does not include features that could encourage
excessive risk taking, such as over weighting toward annual
incentives, highly leveraged payout curves, uncapped incentive
award payments, unreasonable thresholds, or steep payout cliffs at
certain levels that may encourage short term business decisions to
meet payout criteria. |
|
● |
Abbott’s
recoupment policy allows the Compensation Committee to seek
recoupment of incentive compensation, forfeit existing awards or
reduce future awards if it determines that a senior executive
engaged in misconduct or failed in a supervisory capacity,
resulting in a material violation of law or Abbott policy that
caused significant financial harm to Abbott. |
|
● |
Abbott’s hedging
policy prohibits directors and officers from entering into
financial transactions designed to reduce the financial risk
associated with owning Abbott shares. |
|
● |
Abbott’s pledging
policy prohibits directors and officers from holding Abbott shares
in a margin account, pledging Abbott shares, or securing
obligations by assigning Abbott shares as collateral unless granted
an exception by the Compensation Committee. |
This assessment was discussed with the Compensation Committee and
its independent compensation consultant. The Committee and the
consultant both agreed with the assessment.
 |
53 |
Table of
Contents
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE |
The following table summarizes compensation awarded to, earned by,
or paid to the named officers. The section of the proxy statement
captioned, “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Basis for
Compensation Decisions” describes in greater detail the information
reported in this table.
Name and Principal
Position |
|
Year |
|
Salary |
|
Stock
Awards(2) |
|
Option
Awards(3) |
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(4) |
|
Change in
Pension
Value and
Non-qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(5) |
|
All Other
Compensation(6) |
|
SEC Total |
|
Total
Without
Change in
Pension
Value ($)(7) |
Robert B. Ford, |
|
2021 |
|
$1,482,692 |
|
$8,689,294 |
|
$ 8,689,978 |
|
$3,168,400 |
|
$2,755,343 |
|
$129,179 |
|
$24,914,886 |
|
$22,485,091 |
Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive
Officer |
|
2020 |
|
1,298,462 |
|
5,623,995 |
|
5,624,993 |
|
3,675,000 |
|
4,150,264 |
|
77,872 |
|
20,450,586 |
|
16,549,550 |
|
2019 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
3,475,992 |
|
3,476,054 |
|
1,562,500 |
|
2,311,499 |
|
71,841 |
|
11,897,886 |
|
9,777,514 |
Robert E. Funck, Jr., |
|
2021 |
|
825,000 |
|
2,999,666 |
|
2,999,977 |
|
1,048,400 |
|
1,507,073 |
|
159,193 |
|
9,539,309 |
|
8,373,417 |
Executive Vice President,
Finance and Chief
Financial Officer |
|
2020 |
|
813,462 |
|
2,215,867 |
|
2,216,247 |
|
1,280,800 |
|
3,100,265 |
|
173,568 |
|
9,800,209 |
|
7,069,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hubert L. Allen, |
|
2021 |
|
760,000 |
|
2,115,332 |
|
2,115,612 |
|
921,700 |
|
768,954 |
|
172,158 |
|
6,853,756 |
|
6,395,592 |
Executive Vice President,
General Counsel and
Secretary |
|
2020 |
|
751,346 |
|
1,874,607 |
|
1,874,988 |
|
917,700 |
|
2,904,940 |
|
154,596 |
|
8,478,177 |
|
5,919,894 |
|
2019 |
|
710,000 |
|
2,199,962 |
|
2,199,990 |
|
879,700 |
|
1,429,523 |
|
66,905 |
|
7,486,080 |
|
6,386,933 |
Daniel G. Salvadori, |
|
2021 |
|
715,539 |
|
2,388,446 |
|
2,388,734 |
|
925,700 |
|
251,604 |
|
72,276 |
|
6,742,299 |
|
6,533,923 |
Executive Vice
President and Group
President, Established
Pharmaceuticals and
Nutritional Products |
|
2020 |
|
710,000 |
|
1,901,708 |
|
1,902,099 |
|
905,500 |
|
477,011 |
|
79,421 |
|
5,975,739 |
|
5,518,569 |
|
2019 |
|
704,923 |
|
2,351,989 |
|
2,351,986 |
|
903,400 |
|
395,710 |
|
59,806 |
|
6,767,814 |
|
6,388,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrea F. Wainer, |
|
2021 |
|
699,616 |
|
2,388,446 |
|
2,388,734 |
|
931,600 |
|
772,906 |
|
69,112 |
|
7,250,414 |
|
6,564,595 |
Executive Vice President,
Rapid and Molecular
Diagnostics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miles D. White,(1) |
|
2021 |
|
1,900,000 |
|
5,499,490 |
|
5,499,982 |
|
0 |
|
1,918,135 |
|
1,135,477 |
|
15,953,084 |
|
15,953,084 |
Former Executive
Chairman of the Board |
|
2020 |
|
1,900,000 |
|
5,998,934 |
|
5,999,997 |
|
1,250,000 |
|
3,415,343 |
|
1,264,110 |
|
19,828,384 |
|
18,799,774 |
|
2019 |
|
1,900,000 |
|
7,562,448 |
|
7,562,499 |
|
4,405,625 |
|
5,707,836 |
|
664,409 |
|
27,802,817 |
|
24,675,423 |
(1) |
Mr. White
retired from Abbott on December 31, 2021. |
(2) |
In accordance
with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules, the amounts in
this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the
awards in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ASC
Topic 718. Abbott determines grant date fair value by multiplying
the number of shares granted by the average of the high and low
market prices of an Abbott common share on the award’s date of
grant. |
(3) |
In accordance
with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules, the amounts in
this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the
awards in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ASC
Topic 718. These amounts were determined as of the option’s grant
date using a Black-Scholes stock option valuation model. These
amounts are being reported solely for the purpose of comparative
disclosure in accordance with the Securities and Exchange
Commission’s rules. There is no certainty that the amount
determined using a Black-Scholes stock option valuation model would
be the value at which employee stock options would be traded for
cash. The assumptions are the same as those described in Note 8,
entitled “Incentive Stock Program” of Abbott’s Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8, “Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data” in Abbott’s 2021 Annual Report
on Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-K. |
(4) |
This compensation is
earned as a performance-based incentive bonus, pursuant to the 1998
Abbott Laboratories Performance Incentive Plan. Additional
information regarding the Performance Incentive Plan can be found
in the section of this proxy statement captioned, “Compensation
Discussion and Analysis—Basis for Compensation
Decisions.” |
|
|
54 |
 |
Table of
Contents
(5) |
The plan
amounts shown below are reported in this column. |
|
For Messrs. Ford, Allen,
Salvadori, and White, the amounts shown alongside the officer’s
name are for 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively. For Mr. Funck,
Jr., the amounts shown are for 2021 and 2020, respectively. For Ms.
Wainer, the amounts shown are for 2021. |
|
Abbott Laboratories
Annuity Retirement Plan |
|
R. B. Ford: $22,149 /
$142,819 / $176,268; R. E. Funck, Jr.: $89,455 / $256,555; H. L.
Allen: $47,024 / $184,384 / $117,142; D. G. Salvadori: $19,272 /
$45,483 / $41,282; A. F. Wainer: $34,273; and M. D. White:
($56,525) / $34,629 / $180,690. |
|
Abbott Laboratories
Supplemental Pension Plan |
|
R. B. Ford: $2,407,646 /
$3,758,217 / $1,944,104; R. E. Funck, Jr.: $1,076,437 / $2,474,229;
H. L. Allen: $411,140 / $2,373,899 / $982,005; D. G. Salvadori:
$189,104 / $411,687 / $337,711; A. F. Wainer: $651,546; and M. D.
White: ($2,126,024) / $993,981 / $2,946,704. |
|
Non-Qualified Defined
Contribution Plan Earnings |
|
The totals in this column
include reportable interest credited under the 1998 Abbott
Laboratories Performance Incentive Plan, the Abbott Laboratories
401(k) Supplemental Plan, and the 1986 Abbott Laboratories
Management Incentive Plan (although none of the named officers
currently receives awards under this plan). |
|
R. B. Ford: $325,548 /
$249,228 / $191,127; R. E. Funck, Jr.: $341,181 / $369,481; H. L.
Allen: $310,790 / $346,657 / $330,376; D. G. Salvadori: $43,228 /
$19,841 / $16,717; A. F. Wainer: $87,087; and M. D. White:
$1,918,135 / $2,386,733 / $2,580,442. |
(6) |
The amounts shown below
are reported in this column. |
|
For Messrs. Ford, Allen,
Salvadori, and White, the amounts shown alongside the officer’s
name are for 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively. For Mr. Funck,
Jr., the amounts shown are for 2021 and 2020, respectively. For Ms.
Wainer, the amounts shown are for 2021. |
|
Earnings on
Non-Qualified Defined Contribution Plans (net of the reportable
interest included in footnote 5). |
|
R. B. Ford: $8,148 /
$8,116 / $0 ; R. E. Funck, Jr.: $86,107 / $106,106; H. L. Allen:
$95,227 / $81,695 / $896; D. G. Salvadori: $3,566 / $1,701 / $0; A.
F. Wainer: $2,162; and M. D. White: $799,031 / $926,052 /
$105,715. |
|
Each of the named
officers’ awards under the 1998 Abbott Laboratories Performance
Incentive Plan is paid in cash to the officer on a current basis.
Each of the named officers has a grantor trust into which the
awards may be deposited, net of maximum tax withholdings. The named
officers also have grantor trusts in connection with the Abbott
Laboratories 401(k) Supplemental Plan and the 1986 Abbott
Laboratories Management Incentive Plan (although none of the named
officers currently receives awards under the Management Incentive
Plan). These amounts include the trusts’ earnings (net of the
reportable interest included in footnote 5). |
|
Employer Contributions
to Defined Contribution Plans |
|
R. B. Ford: $74,135 /
$64,924 / $50,000; R. E. Funck, Jr.: $41,250 / $40,673; H. L.
Allen: $38,000 / $37,568 / $35,500; D. G. Salvadori: $35,777 /
$35,500 / $35,247; A. F. Wainer: $34,981; and M. D. White: $95,000
/ $95,000 / $95,000. |
|
These amounts include
employer contributions to both Abbott’s tax-qualified defined
contribution plan and the Abbott Laboratories 401(k) Supplemental
Plan. The Abbott Laboratories 401(k) Supplemental Plan permits
eligible Abbott officers to contribute amounts in excess of the
limit set by the Internal Revenue Code for employee contributions
to 401(k) plans up to the excess of (i) 18% of their base salary
over (ii) the amount contributed to Abbott’s tax-qualified 401(k)
plan. Abbott matches participant contributions at the rate of 250%
of the first 2% of compensation contributed to the plan. The named
officers have these amounts paid to them in cash on a current basis
and deposited into a grantor trust established by the officer, net
of maximum tax withholdings. |
|
|
 |
55 |
Table of
Contents
|
Other
Compensation |
|
Messrs. Ford’s and
White’s non-business-related flights on corporate aircraft are
covered by time-sharing lease agreements, pursuant to which they
reimburse Abbott for certain costs associated with those flights in
accordance with Federal Aviation Administration regulations. The
following amounts are included in the totals in this column, which
reflect Abbott’s incremental cost less reimbursements for
non-business-related flights: R. B. Ford: $46,419 / $4,832 / $0; M.
D. White: $0 / $10,792 / $226,633. |
|
Abbott determines the
incremental cost for flights based on the direct cost to Abbott,
including fuel costs, parking, handling and landing fees, catering,
travel fees, and other miscellaneous direct costs. |
|
For Mr. White, the
following costs associated with security less the amount reimbursed
are included: $240,446 / $232,266 / $237,061. Abbott determines the
cost for these expenses based on its actual costs. The security is
provided on the recommendation of an independent security
study. |
|
Also included in the
totals shown in the table is the cost of providing a corporate
automobile less the amount reimbursed by the officer: R. B. Ford:
$0 / $0 / $21,841; R. E. Funck, Jr.: $22,661 / $20,319; H. L.
Allen: $27,613 / $28,666 / $25,509; D. G. Salvadori: $21,933 /
$26,773 / $24,559; and A. F. Wainer: $20,969. |
|
For Messrs. Funck, Jr.,
Allen, and Salvadori and Ms. Wainer, the following costs associated
with financial planning are included: R. E. Funck, Jr.: $8,175 /
$6,470; H. L. Allen: $10,000 / $6,667 / $5,000; D. G. Salvadori:
$10,000 / $15,447 / $0; and A. F. Wainer: $10,000. For Mr.
Salvadori, the 2020 amount includes payments for services incurred
in 2020 and 2019. |
|
The totals shown in the
table include other miscellaneous benefits in 2021: R. B. Ford:
$477; R. E. Funck, Jr.: $1,000; H. L. Allen: $1,318; D. G.
Salvadori: $1,000; A. F. Wainer: $1,000; and M. D. White:
$1,000. |
|
The named officers are
also eligible to participate in an executive disability benefit
described on page 65. |
(7) |
To demonstrate how year
over year changes in pension value impact total compensation, as
determined under SEC rules, we have included this column to show
total compensation without pension value changes. The amounts
reported in this column are calculated by subtracting the change in
pension value reported in the Change in Pension Value and
Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings column, as described
in footnote 5 to this table, from the amounts reported in the SEC
Total column. The amounts reported in this column differ from, and
are not a substitute for, the amounts reported in the SEC Total
column. |
|
|
56 |
 |
Table of
Contents
2021
GRANTS OF PLAN BASED AWARDS |
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future
Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards(1) |
|
Estimated
Future Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards |
|
All Other
Option Awards:
Numbers of
Securities
Underlying |
|
Exercise or
Base Price
of Options |
|
Closing
Market |
|
Grant Date Fair
Value of Stock |
Name |
|
Grant
Date |
|
Target
($) |
|
Maximum
($) |
|
Target
(#)(2)(3) |
|
Options
(#)(4) |
|
Awards
($/Sh.) |
|
Price on
Grant Date |
|
and Option
Awards |
R. B. Ford |
|
2/19/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
70,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$8,689,294(5) |
|
|
2/19/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
359,090 |
|
$124.04 |
|
$123.04 |
|
8,689,978(6) |
R. E. Funck, Jr. |
|
2/19/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
24,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,999,666(5) |
|
|
2/19/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,966 |
|
124.04 |
|
123.04 |
|
2,999,977(6) |
H. L. Allen |
|
2/19/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
17,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,115,332(5) |
|
|
2/19/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,422 |
|
124.04 |
|
123.04 |
|
2,115,612(6) |
D. G. Salvadori |
|
2/19/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
19,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,388,446(5) |
|
|
2/19/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,708 |
|
124.04 |
|
123.04 |
|
2,388,734(6) |
A. F. Wainer |
|
2/19/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
19,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,388,446(5) |
|
|
2/19/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,708 |
|
124.04 |
|
123.04 |
|
2,388,734(6) |
M. D. White |
|
2/19/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
44,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,499,490(5) |
|
|
2/19/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227,272 |
|
124.04 |
|
123.04 |
|
5,499,982(6) |
(1) |
During 2021, each of the
named officers participated in the 1998 Abbott Laboratories
Performance Incentive Plan, an annual, non-equity incentive plan.
The annual cash incentive award earned by the named officer in 2021
under the plan is shown in the Summary Compensation Table under the
column captioned, “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.” No
future payouts will be made under the plan’s 2021 annual cash
incentive award. The Performance Incentive Plan is described in
greater detail in the section of the proxy statement captioned,
“Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Basis for Compensation
Decisions.” |
(2) |
These are performance-based restricted
stock awards that have a 3-year term and vest upon Abbott reaching
a minimum return on equity target, with no more than one-third of
the award vesting in any one year. In 2021, Abbott reached its
minimum return on equity target and one-third of each of the awards
made on February 19, 2021 vested on February 28, 2022. The equity
targets are described in the section of the proxy statement
captioned, “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Basis for
Compensation Decisions.” |
(3) |
In the event of a grantee’s death or
disability, these awards are deemed fully earned. The treatment of
these awards upon a change in control is described in the section
of the proxy statement captioned, “Potential Payments Upon
Termination or Change in Control—Equity Awards.” Outstanding
restricted shares and restricted stock units receive dividend
payments at the same rate as all other shareholders. |
(4) |
Options with respect to one-third of
the shares covered by these awards are exercisable after one year;
two-thirds after two years; and all after three years. The options
vest in the event of the grantee’s death or disability. The
treatment of these awards upon a change in control is described in
the section of the proxy statement captioned, “Potential Payments
Upon Termination or Change in Control—Equity Awards.” Under the
Abbott Laboratories 2017 Incentive Stock Program, these options
have an exercise price equal to the average of the high and low
market prices (rounded-up to the next even penny) of an Abbott
common share on the date of grant. |
(5) |
Abbott determines the grant date fair
value of stock and stock unit awards by multiplying the number of
restricted shares or restricted stock units granted by the average
of the high and low market prices of a common share on the grant
date. |
(6) |
These values were determined as of the
option’s grant date using a Black-Scholes stock option valuation
model. The model uses the assumptions described in Note 8, entitled
“Incentive Stock Program” of Abbott’s Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements included under Item 8, “Financial Statements
and Supplemental Data” in Abbott’s 2021 Annual Report on Securities
and Exchange Commission Form 10-K. |
|
|
 |
57 |
Table of
Contents
2021 OUTSTANDING
EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END |
The
following table summarizes the outstanding equity awards held by
the named officers at year end.
|
|
Option
Awards(1)(2) |
|
Stock
Awards(2) |
Name |
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable |
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable |
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#) |
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($) |
|
Option
Expiration
Date |
|
Number
of Shares
or Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#) |
|
Market
Value
of Shares
or Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($) |
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(#) |
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($) |
R. B.
Ford |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,265 |
|
$2,148,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,749 |
|
6,016,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,058 |
|
9,859,963 |
|
|
45,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ 39.12 |
|
02/20/24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
41.14 |
|
06/30/24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
47.00 |
|
02/19/25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
48.90 |
|
05/31/25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
38.40 |
|
02/18/26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
44.40 |
|
02/16/27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
59.94 |
|
02/15/28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,039 |
|
80,020 |
|
|
|
75.90 |
|
02/21/29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,298 |
|
260,598 |
|
|
|
87.72 |
|
02/20/30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
359,090 |
|
|
|
124.04 |
|
02/18/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. E. Funck, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,781 |
|
$1,095,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,843 |
|
2,370,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,185 |
|
3,403,797 |
|
|
55,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ 47.00 |
|
02/19/25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
44.40 |
|
02/16/27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
59.94 |
|
02/15/28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,578 |
|
40,789 |
|
|
|
75.90 |
|
02/21/29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,337 |
|
102,676 |
|
|
|
87.72 |
|
02/20/30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,966 |
|
|
|
124.04 |
|
02/18/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. L.
Allen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,661 |
|
$1,359,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,249 |
|
2,005,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,055 |
|
2,400,321 |
|
|
157,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ 47.00 |
|
02/19/25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
38.40 |
|
02/18/26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
44.40 |
|
02/16/27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
59.94 |
|
02/15/28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,288 |
|
50,645 |
|
|
|
75.90 |
|
02/21/29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,432 |
|
86,866 |
|
|
|
87.72 |
|
02/20/30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,422 |
|
|
|
124.04 |
|
02/18/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
 |
Table of
Contents
|
|
Option
Awards(1)(2) |
|
Stock
Awards(2) |
Name |
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable |
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable |
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#) |
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($) |
|
Option
Expiration
Date |
|
Number
of Shares
or Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#) |
|
Market
Value
of Shares
or Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($) |
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(#) |
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($) |
D. G.
Salvadori |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,329 |
|
$1,453,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,455 |
|
2,034,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,257 |
|
2,710,230 |
|
|
23,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ 38.40 |
|
02/18/26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
44.40 |
|
02/16/27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
50.72 |
|
07/20/27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
59.94 |
|
02/15/28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,286 |
|
54,144 |
|
|
|
75.90 |
|
02/21/29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,060 |
|
88,122 |
|
|
|
87.72 |
|
02/20/30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,708 |
|
|
|
124.04 |
|
02/18/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. F. Wainer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,035 |
|
$ 427,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,989 |
|
561,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,050 |
|
1,273,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,257 |
|
2,710,230 |
|
|
8,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ 47.00 |
|
02/19/25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
38.40 |
|
02/18/26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
44.40 |
|
02/16/27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
59.94 |
|
02/15/28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,825 |
|
15,913 |
|
|
|
75.90 |
|
02/21/29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,816 |
|
20,909 |
|
|
|
76.12 |
|
06/02/29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,585 |
|
55,172 |
|
|
|
87.72 |
|
02/20/30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,708 |
|
|
|
124.04 |
|
02/18/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. D.
White |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,212 |
|
$4,674,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,599 |
|
6,417,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,340 |
|
6,240,412 |
|
|
727,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
$
39.12 |
|
02/20/24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
937,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
47.00 |
|
02/19/25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,198,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
38.40 |
|
02/18/26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
638,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
44.40 |
|
02/16/27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
688,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
59.94 |
|
02/15/28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
348,181 |
|
174,091 |
|
|
|
75.90 |
|
02/21/29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,985 |
|
277,971 |
|
|
|
87.72 |
|
02/20/30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227,272 |
|
|
|
124.04 |
|
02/18/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Except as noted, these
options are fully vested. |
|
|
 |
59 |
Table of
Contents
(2) |
The vesting dates of
outstanding unexercisable stock options and unvested restricted
stock awards at December 31, 2021 are as follows. |
|
|
Option
Awards |
|
Stock
Awards(a) |
Name |
|
Number of
Unexercised Shares
Remaining from
Original Grant |
|
Number of
Option Shares
Vesting—Date
Vested 2022 |
|
Number of
Option Shares
Vesting—Date
Vesting 2023 |
|
Number of
Option Shares
Vesting—Date
Vesting 2024 |
|
Number of
Restricted
Shares or
Units |
|
Number of
Restricted
Shares or Units
Vesting—Date
Vested 2022 |
R. B.
Ford |
|
80,020 |
|
80,020 -
2/22 |
|
|
|
|
|
15,265 |
|
(b) |
|
|
260,598 |
|
130,299 - 2/21 |
|
130,299
- 2/21 |
|
|
|
42,749 |
|
(c) |
|
|
359,090 |
|
119,696 - 2/19 |
|
119,697 - 2/19 |
|
119,697 - 2/19 |
|
70,058 |
|
(d) |
R. E. Funck, Jr. |
|
40,789 |
|
40,789 - 2/22 |
|
|
|
|
|
7,781 |
|
(b) |
|
|
102,676 |
|
51,338 - 2/21 |
|
51,338 - 2/21 |
|
|
|
16,843 |
|
(c) |
|
|
123,966 |
|
41,322 - 2/19 |
|
41,322 - 2/19 |
|
41,322 - 2/19 |
|
24,185 |
|
(d) |
H. L.
Allen |
|
50,645 |
|
50,645 -
2/22 |
|
|
|
|
|
9,661 |
|
(b) |
|
|
86,866 |
|
43,433 -
2/21 |
|
43,433 -
2/21 |
|
|
|
14,249 |
|
(c) |
|
|
87,422 |
|
29,140 -
2/19 |
|
29,141 -
2/19 |
|
29,141 -
2/19 |
|
17,055 |
|
(d) |
D. G. Salvadori |
|
54,144 |
|
54,144 - 2/22 |
|
|
|
|
|
10,329 |
|
(b) |
|
|
88,122 |
|
44,061 - 2/21 |
|
44,061 - 2/21 |
|
|
|
14,455 |
|
(c) |
|
|
98,708 |
|
32,902 - 2/19 |
|
32,903 - 2/19 |
|
32,903 - 2/19 |
|
19,257 |
|
(d) |
A. F.
Wainer |
|
15,913 |
|
15,913 -
2/22 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,035 |
|
(b) |
|
|
20,909 |
|
20,909 -
6/3 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,989 |
|
(e) |
|
|
55,172 |
|
27,586 -
2/21 |
|
27,586 -
2/21 |
|
|
|
9,050 |
|
(c) |
|
|
98,708 |
|
32,902 -
2/19 |
|
32,903 -
2/19 |
|
32,903 -
2/19 |
|
19,257 |
|
(d) |
M. D. White |
|
174,091 |
|
174,091 - 2/22 |
|
|
|
|
|
33,212 |
|
(b) |
|
|
277,971 |
|
138,985 - 2/21 |
|
138,986 - 2/21 |
|
|
|
45,599 |
|
(c) |
|
|
227,272 |
|
75,757 - 2/19 |
|
75,757 - 2/19 |
|
75,758 - 2/19 |
|
44,340 |
|
(d) |
(a) |
The equity targets are
described in the section of the proxy statement captioned,
“Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Basis for Compensation
Decisions.” |
(b) |
These are the restricted shares that
remained outstanding and unvested on December 31, 2021, from an
award made on February 22, 2019. The award has a 3-year term with
no more than one-third of the original award vesting in any one
year upon Abbott reaching a minimum return on equity target,
measured at the end of the relevant year. In 2021, Abbott reached
its minimum return on equity target and these shares vested on
February 28, 2022. |
(c) |
These are the restricted shares that
remained outstanding and unvested on December 31, 2021, from an
award made on February 21, 2020. The award has a 3-year term with
no more than one-third of the original award vesting in any one
year upon Abbott reaching a minimum return on equity target,
measured at the end of the relevant year. In 2021, Abbott reached
its minimum return on equity target and half of these shares vested
on February 28, 2022. |
(d) |
These are the restricted shares that
remained outstanding and unvested on December 31, 2021, from an
award made on February 19, 2021. The award has a 3-year term with
no more than one-third of the original award vesting in any one
year upon Abbott reaching a minimum return on equity target,
measured at the end of the relevant year. In 2021, Abbott reached
its minimum return on equity target and one-third of these shares
vested on February 28, 2022. |
(e) |
These are the restricted shares that
remained outstanding and unvested on December 31, 2021, from an
award made on June 3, 2019. The award has a 3-year term, with no
more than one-third of the original award vesting in any one year
upon Abbott reaching a minimum return on equity target, measured at
the end of the relevant year. In 2021, Abbott reached its minimum
return on equity target and these shares will vest on June 3,
2022. |
|
|
60 |
 |
Table of
Contents
2021 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK
VESTED |
The following table
summarizes for each named officer the number of shares the officer
acquired on the exercise of stock options and the number of shares
the officer acquired on the vesting of stock awards in
2021:
|
|
Option Awards |
|
Stock Awards |
Name |
|
Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#) |
|
|
Value Realized
on Exercise
($) |
|
Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#) |
|
|
Value
Realized on
Vesting
($) |
R. B. Ford |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
51,611 |
|
|
$ |
6,274,865 |
R. E. Funck, Jr. |
|
|
31,325 |
|
|
|
2,613,132 |
|
|
22,880 |
|
|
|
2,781,750 |
H. L. Allen |
|
|
203,393 |
|
|
|
17,225,354 |
|
|
31,757 |
|
|
|
3,861,016 |
D. G. Salvadori |
|
|
110,000 |
|
|
|
10,526,252 |
|
|
28,646 |
|
|
|
3,482,781 |
A. F. Wainer |
|
|
79,000 |
|
|
|
7,112,661 |
|
|
15,457 |
|
|
|
1,820,704 |
M. D. White |
|
|
1,282,500 |
|
|
|
130,073,916 |
|
|
97,721 |
|
|
|
11,880,919 |
During
2021, the named officers participated in two Abbott sponsored
defined benefit pension plans: the Abbott Laboratories Annuity
Retirement Plan, a tax qualified pension plan; and the Abbott
Laboratories Supplemental Pension Plan, a non-qualified
supplemental pension plan. The Supplemental Pension Plan also
includes a benefit feature Abbott uses to attract officers who are
at the mid-point of their careers. This feature provides an
additional benefit to officers who are mid-career hires that is
less valuable to officers who have spent most of their careers at
Abbott. Except as provided in Abbott’s change in control
agreements, Abbott does not have a policy granting extra years of
credited service under the plans. These change in control
agreements are described on pages 66 and 67.
The
compensation considered in determining the pension payable to the
named officers is the compensation shown in the “Salary” and
“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” columns of the Summary
Compensation Table on page 54.