UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[X] Quarterly Report
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
For the quarterly
period ended: June 30, 2010
Commission file
number: 0-10997
WEST COAST BANCORP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Oregon
|
93-0810577
|
(State or other jurisdiction
|
I.R.S. Employer Identification
Number
|
of incorporation or
organization)
|
|
5335 Meadows Road –
Suite 201, Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035
(Address of principal executive
offices)(Zip code)
(503)
684-0884
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days.
Yes [ X ] No
[ ]
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post
such files).
Yes [ ] No
[ ]
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a small reporting company. See the definitions of
“large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company”
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):
[ ] Large
Accelerated Filer [ ] Accelerated Filer [ ]
Non-accelerated Filer [ X ] Smaller Reporting Company
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes [ ] No
[ X ]
Indicate the number
of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the
latest practicable date.
Common Stock, no par value: 96,419,662 shares outstanding as of July 31,
2010
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
PAGE
|
PART I: FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
|
|
3
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
3
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
LOSS
|
|
4
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
5
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
7
|
|
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
About Market Risk
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
Controls and
Procedures
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
PART II: OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1A.
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
and Use of Proceeds
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
Defaults Upon Senior
Securities
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
[Reserved]
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
|
Other
Information
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
|
55
|
- 2 -
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial Statements (Unaudited)
WEST COAST
BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
(Dollars and shares in
thousands, unaudited)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
45,685
|
|
|
$
|
47,708
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
13,431
|
|
|
|
20,559
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits in other
banks
|
|
|
109,781
|
|
|
|
234,830
|
|
Total cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
168,897
|
|
|
|
303,097
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
677
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
Investment securities available for
sale, at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(amortized cost: $639,305 and $564,615,
respectively)
|
|
|
646,231
|
|
|
|
562,277
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, held at cost
|
|
|
12,148
|
|
|
|
12,148
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
2,635
|
|
|
|
1,176
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
1,602,032
|
|
|
|
1,724,842
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(43,329
|
)
|
|
|
(38,490
|
)
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
1,558,703
|
|
|
|
1,686,352
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
27,526
|
|
|
|
28,476
|
|
Other real estate owned, net
|
|
|
37,578
|
|
|
|
53,594
|
|
Core deposit intangible, net
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
637
|
|
Bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
24,829
|
|
|
|
24,417
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
25,785
|
|
|
|
60,642
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,505,486
|
|
|
$
|
2,733,547
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand
|
|
$
|
533,865
|
|
|
$
|
542,215
|
|
Savings and interest bearing
demand
|
|
|
433,001
|
|
|
|
422,838
|
|
Money market
|
|
|
661,913
|
|
|
|
657,306
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
375,321
|
|
|
|
524,525
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
2,004,100
|
|
|
|
2,146,884
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12,600
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
164,199
|
|
|
|
250,699
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
51,000
|
|
|
|
51,000
|
|
Reserve for unfunded commitments
|
|
|
1,018
|
|
|
|
928
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
17,757
|
|
|
|
22,378
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,238,074
|
|
|
|
2,484,489
|
|
|
Commitments and contingent liabilities
(Note 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock: no par value, 10,000 shares authorized;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A issued and outstanding: None at
June 30, 2010, 1,429 at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
118,124
|
|
Series B issued and outstanding:
121 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009
|
|
|
21,124
|
|
|
|
21,124
|
|
Common stock: no par value, 250,000
shares authorized;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
issued and outstanding: 96,421 at June
30, 2010 and 15,641 at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
228,837
|
|
|
|
93,246
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
13,213
|
|
|
|
17,950
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive gain
(loss)
|
|
|
4,238
|
|
|
|
(1,386
|
)
|
Total stockholders'
equity
|
|
|
267,412
|
|
|
|
249,058
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders' equity
|
|
$
|
2,505,486
|
|
|
$
|
2,733,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial
statements.
- 3 -
WEST COAST BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
LOSS
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
(Dollars and shares in
thousands, except per share)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
INTEREST INCOME:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans
|
|
$
|
22,416
|
|
|
$
|
26,247
|
|
|
$
|
45,259
|
|
|
$
|
52,364
|
|
Interest on taxable investment
securities
|
|
|
3,688
|
|
|
|
1,893
|
|
|
|
7,299
|
|
|
|
3,600
|
|
Interest on nontaxable investment securities
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
679
|
|
|
|
1,145
|
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
Interest on deposits in other
banks
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
Interest on federal funds sold
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
26,816
|
|
|
|
28,869
|
|
|
|
54,014
|
|
|
|
57,477
|
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings, interest bearing demand deposits and money
market
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
2,447
|
|
|
|
2,792
|
|
|
|
5,027
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
2,103
|
|
|
|
3,912
|
|
|
|
4,776
|
|
|
|
7,817
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
687
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
4,002
|
|
|
|
1,728
|
|
|
|
5,859
|
|
|
|
2,718
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
884
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
7,906
|
|
|
|
8,655
|
|
|
|
14,471
|
|
|
|
17,133
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
18,910
|
|
|
|
20,214
|
|
|
|
39,543
|
|
|
|
40,344
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
7,758
|
|
|
|
11,393
|
|
|
|
15,392
|
|
|
|
34,524
|
|
Net interest income after provision for credit losses
|
|
|
11,152
|
|
|
|
8,821
|
|
|
|
24,151
|
|
|
|
5,820
|
|
|
NONINTEREST INCOME:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
4,213
|
|
|
|
4,133
|
|
|
|
7,809
|
|
|
|
7,938
|
|
Payment systems related
revenue
|
|
|
2,875
|
|
|
|
2,359
|
|
|
|
5,411
|
|
|
|
4,496
|
|
Trust and investment services revenue
|
|
|
1,167
|
|
|
|
971
|
|
|
|
2,146
|
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
Gains on sales of loans
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
1,099
|
|
Net OREO valuation adjustments and gains (losses) on
sales
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
(3,683
|
)
|
|
|
(2,267
|
)
|
|
|
(8,487
|
)
|
Other noninterest income
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
|
787
|
|
|
|
1,542
|
|
|
|
2,729
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment losses
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
Gains on sales of securities
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
945
|
|
|
|
833
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
|
9,625
|
|
|
|
5,958
|
|
|
|
16,033
|
|
|
|
10,306
|
|
|
NONINTEREST EXPENSE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
11,322
|
|
|
|
11,267
|
|
|
|
22,497
|
|
|
|
22,462
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
1,606
|
|
|
|
1,850
|
|
|
|
3,182
|
|
|
|
3,742
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
2,249
|
|
|
|
2,295
|
|
|
|
4,433
|
|
|
|
4,661
|
|
Payment systems related
expense
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
|
|
998
|
|
|
|
2,216
|
|
|
|
1,917
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
1,161
|
|
|
|
1,371
|
|
|
|
2,022
|
|
|
|
2,298
|
|
Postage, printing and office
supplies
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
826
|
|
|
|
1,541
|
|
|
|
1,621
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
738
|
|
|
|
696
|
|
|
|
1,425
|
|
|
|
1,326
|
|
Communications
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
763
|
|
|
|
797
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13,059
|
|
Other noninterest expense
|
|
|
3,503
|
|
|
|
5,537
|
|
|
|
5,925
|
|
|
|
8,735
|
|
Total noninterest
expense
|
|
|
22,909
|
|
|
|
25,244
|
|
|
|
44,004
|
|
|
|
60,618
|
|
|
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
(2,132
|
)
|
|
|
(10,465
|
)
|
|
|
(3,820
|
)
|
|
|
(44,492
|
)
|
PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
1,717
|
|
|
|
(4,126
|
)
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
(14,554
|
)
|
NET LOSS
|
|
$
|
(3,849
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,339
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,737
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,938
|
)
|
|
Basic loss per share
|
|
|
($
0.04
|
)
|
|
|
($0.41
|
)
|
|
|
($
0.06
|
)
|
|
|
($1.91
|
)
|
Diluted
loss per share
|
|
|
($
0.04
|
)
|
|
|
($0.41
|
)
|
|
|
($0.06
|
)
|
|
|
($1.91
|
)
|
|
Weighted average common shares
|
|
|
92,123
|
|
|
|
15,522
|
|
|
|
79,693
|
|
|
|
15,504
|
|
Weighted average diluted
shares
|
|
|
92,123
|
|
|
|
15,522
|
|
|
|
79,693
|
|
|
|
15,504
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial
statements.
- 4 -
WEST COAST BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
CASH FLOWS
|
|
Six months ended
|
(Dollars in thousands,
unaudited)
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(4,737
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,938
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net
cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and accretion
|
|
|
4,159
|
|
|
|
2,587
|
|
Amortization of tax credits
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
660
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit
|
|
|
(2,598
|
)
|
|
|
(4,213
|
)
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
15,392
|
|
|
|
34,524
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13,059
|
|
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
254
|
|
Decrease in other assets
|
|
|
33,516
|
|
|
|
4,830
|
|
Loss on impairment of securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
Gains on sales of securities
|
|
|
(945
|
)
|
|
|
(833
|
)
|
Net loss on disposal of premises and equipment
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Net OREO valuation adjustments and gains
(losses) on sales
|
|
|
2,267
|
|
|
|
8,487
|
|
Gains on sale of loans
|
|
|
(447
|
)
|
|
|
(1,099
|
)
|
Origination of loans held for
sale
|
|
|
(11,838
|
)
|
|
|
(47,195
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale
|
|
|
10,826
|
|
|
|
47,773
|
|
Increase in interest payable
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities
|
|
|
(5,037
|
)
|
|
|
1,430
|
|
Increase in cash surrender value of bank
owned life insurance
|
|
|
(412
|
)
|
|
|
(415
|
)
|
Stock based compensation expense
|
|
|
803
|
|
|
|
901
|
|
Excess tax deficiency associated with
stock plans
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(242
|
)
|
Decrease in trading securities
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
938
|
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
41,501
|
|
|
|
31,990
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities of available for sale securities
|
|
|
86,617
|
|
|
|
24,466
|
|
Proceeds from sales of available for
sale securities
|
|
|
36,728
|
|
|
|
36,189
|
|
Purchase of available for sale securities
|
|
|
(199,285
|
)
|
|
|
(231,591
|
)
|
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank
stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,305
|
)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Loan principal collected in excess of
loan originations
|
|
|
102,487
|
|
|
|
83,114
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of other real estate owned
|
|
|
25,961
|
|
|
|
18,542
|
|
Capital expenditures on other real
estate owned
|
|
|
(2,420
|
)
|
|
|
(1,714
|
)
|
Capital expenditures on premises and equipment
|
|
|
(1,169
|
)
|
|
|
(1,104
|
)
|
Net
cash provided (used) by investing activities
|
|
|
48,919
|
|
|
|
(73,412
|
)
|
- 5 -
WEST COAST BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
CASH FLOWS (Continued)
|
|
Six months ended
|
(Dollars in thousands,
unaudited)
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in demand, savings and interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bearing transaction
accounts
|
|
|
6,420
|
|
|
|
45,760
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in time
deposits
|
|
|
(149,204
|
)
|
|
|
39,228
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of short-term borrowings
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
347,600
|
|
Repayment of short-term
borrowings
|
|
|
(17,600
|
)
|
|
|
(479,600
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term borrowings
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
192,240
|
|
Repayment of long-term
borrowings
|
|
|
(81,500
|
)
|
|
|
(20,000
|
)
|
Proceeds from secured borrowings
|
|
|
2,834
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Repayment of secured
borrowings
|
|
|
(2,834
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock-Rights Offering
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Costs of issuance of common stock-Rights
Offering
|
|
|
(591
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock-Discretionary
Program
|
|
|
7,856
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Costs of issuance of common
stock-Discretionary Program
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Activity in deferred compensation plan
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Redemption of stock pursuant to stock
plans
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(315
|
)
|
Net
cash (used) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(224,620
|
)
|
|
|
124,926
|
|
|
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(134,200
|
)
|
|
|
83,504
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
|
|
303,097
|
|
|
|
64,778
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF
PERIOD
|
|
$
|
168,897
|
|
|
$
|
148,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
notes to consolidated
financial statements.
-
6 -
WEST COAST
BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
(Shares and dollars in thousands, unaudited)
|
|
Preferred
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Retained
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Income
(Loss)
|
|
Total
|
BALANCE, January 1, 2009
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
15,696
|
|
|
$
|
92,245
|
|
|
$
|
107,542
|
|
|
$
|
(1,600
|
)
|
|
$
|
198,187
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(91,213
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(91,213
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income, net of
tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized investment gain
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,149
|
|
|
|
2,149
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of
tax
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,149
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(89,064
|
)
|
|
Cumulative effect of adopting ASC
320
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,935
|
|
|
|
(1,935
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Cash dividends, $.02 per common share
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(314
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(314
|
)
|
Redemption of stock pursuant to stock
plans
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
Issuance of Series A preferred stock, net of costs
|
|
|
118,124
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
118,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Series B preferred stock and
warrant, net of costs
|
|
|
21,124
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
21,124
|
|
Activity in deferred compensation plan
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Stock based compensation
expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,520
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,520
|
|
Tax adjustment associated with stock plans
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(496
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(496
|
)
|
BALANCE, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
139,248
|
|
|
15,641
|
|
|
|
93,246
|
|
|
|
17,950
|
|
|
|
(1,386
|
)
|
|
|
249,058
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,737
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(4,737
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income, net of
tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized investment gain
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,624
|
|
|
|
5,624
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of
tax
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,624
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
887
|
|
|
Redemption of stock pursuant to stock
plans
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
Conversion of Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
(118,124
|
)
|
|
71,442
|
|
|
|
118,124
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Issuance of common stock-Rights
Offering, net of costs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
9,409
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9,409
|
|
Issuance of common stock-Discretionary Program, net of
costs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,803
|
|
|
|
7,037
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,037
|
|
Activity in deferred compensation
plan
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
Issuance of common stock-restricted stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,572
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Stock based compensation
expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
803
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
803
|
|
BALANCE, June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
21,124
|
|
|
96,421
|
|
|
$
|
228,837
|
|
|
$
|
13,213
|
|
|
$
|
4,238
|
|
|
$
|
267,412
|
|
|
See
notes to consolidated
financial statements.
- 7 -
WEST COAST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. BASIS OF
PRESENTATION
The interim unaudited consolidated financial
statements have been prepared by management in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim
financial information. In addition, this report has been prepared in accordance
with the instructions for Form 10-Q, and therefore, these financial statements
do not include all of the information and notes required by generally accepted
accounting principles for complete financial statements. The accompanying
interim consolidated financial statements include the accounts of West Coast
Bancorp (“Bancorp” or the “Company”), and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, West
Coast Bank (the “Bank”), West Coast Trust and Totten, Inc., after elimination of
intercompany transactions and balances. The Company’s interim consolidated
financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the
audited financial statements and related notes, including our significant
accounting policies, contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009 (“2009 10-K”).
The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates. The financial information contained in this report reflects all
adjustments of a normal, recurring nature that, in the opinion of management,
are necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim periods. The
results of operations and cash flows for the three and six months ended June 30,
2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the
year ending December 31, 2010, or other future periods.
Supplemental cash flow information.
The following table
presents supplemental cash flow information for the six months ended June 30,
2010 and 2009.
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Supplemental cash flow
information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid (received) in the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
14,455
|
|
|
$
|
17,052
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(27,792
|
)
|
|
|
(13,906
|
)
|
|
Noncash investing and financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized gain (loss)
on available
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for sale securities, net of
tax
|
|
$
|
5,624
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
Dividends declared and
accrued in other liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
Other Real Estate Owned and
premises and equipment expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
accrued in other
liabilities
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
Transfer of loans to OREO
|
|
|
9,770
|
|
|
|
38,910
|
|
Accrued costs of issuing common
stock, discretionary program
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
New accounting pronouncements.
On July 21, 2010, the FASB issued guidance
contained in Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”), 2010-20 “Disclosures About the
Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses”
that amends Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), 310 “Receivables” by
requiring additional and disaggregated disclosures about the credit quality of
an entity’s financing receivables and its allowance for credit losses. The new
and amended disclosures that relate to information as of the end of a reporting
period will be effective for the first interim or annual reporting periods
ending
on or after December 15, 2010. The disclosures
that include information for activity that occurs during a reporting period will
be effective for the first interim or annual periods beginning after December
15, 2010.
The adoption of this guidance is not expected
to
have a material impact on the
Company’s consolidated statement of income (loss), its consolidated balance
sheet, or its consolidated statement of cash flows.
- 8 -
2. STOCK PLANS
At June 30, 2010, Bancorp maintained two stock
plans; the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (“2002 Plan”) and the 1999 Stock Option
Plan (“1999 Plan”). No additional grants may be made under the 1999 Plan. The
2002 Plan, which is shareholder approved, permits the grant of stock options,
restricted stock and certain other stock based awards. On April 26, 2010,
shareholders approved a 2.0 million share increase in the shares available under
the 2002 Plan. The 2002 Plan permits the grant of stock options and restricted
stock awards for up to 4.1 million shares, of which 488,771 shares remained
available for issuance as of June 30, 2010.
All outstanding stock options have an exercise
price that is equal to the closing market value of Bancorp’s stock on the date
the options were granted. Options granted under the 2002 Plan generally vest
over a two to four year vesting period; however, certain grants have been made
that vested immediately, including grants to directors. Stock options granted
have a 10 year maximum term. Options previously issued under the 1999 Plan are
fully vested. It is Bancorp’s policy to issue new shares for stock option
exercises and restricted stock. Bancorp expenses stock options and restricted
stock on a straight line basis over the applicable vesting term.
The following table presents
information on stock options outstanding for the period shown:
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Common
Shares
|
|
Exercise
Price per share
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
1,746,752
|
|
|
$
|
13.08
|
Granted
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
2.63
|
Exercised
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
2.31
|
Forfeited/expired
|
|
(199,179
|
)
|
|
|
10.96
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
1,548,373
|
|
|
$
|
13.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents
information on stock options outstanding for the periods shown, less estimated
forfeitures:
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
Six months ended
|
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
Stock options vested and expected to
vest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
1,509,864
|
|
|
1,731,665
|
Weighted average exercise price per
share
|
|
$
|
13.34
|
|
$
|
13.09
|
Aggregate intrinsic
value
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
$
|
-
|
Weighted average contractual term of
options
|
|
|
5.2 years
|
|
|
5.6 years
|
|
Stock options vested and currently
exercisable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
1,302,449
|
|
|
1,275,553
|
Weighted average exercise price per
share
|
|
$
|
14.76
|
|
$
|
15.68
|
Aggregate intrinsic
value
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
$
|
-
|
Weighted average contractual term of
options
|
|
|
4.6 years
|
|
|
4.1
years
|
There was no intrinsic value in any options
exercised in the periods presented. The balance of unearned compensation related
to stock options as of June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, was $.2 million and
$.3 million, respectively.
The fair value of each stock option granted is
estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes based stock option
valuation model. Expected volatilities are based on implied volatilities from
Bancorp’s stock, historical volatility of Bancorp’s stock, and other factors.
Expected dividend yields are based on dividend trends and the market price of
Bancorp’s stock price at grant. Bancorp uses historical data to estimate option
exercises and employee terminations within the valuation model. The risk-free
rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S.
Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
The following table presents the
Black-Scholes assumptions used in connection with stock option grants in
the periods shown.
- 9 -
|
|
Black-Scholes assumptions
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
Risk Free interest rates
|
|
|
1.43
|
%
|
|
|
1.64
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.22
|
%
|
Expected lives, in years
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
Weighted avg. fair value of options
granted in period
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
2. STOCK PLANS
(Continued)
The following table presents
information on restricted stock outstanding for the period shown:
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Market
|
|
|
Restricted
Shares
|
|
Price at
Grant
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
136,680
|
|
|
$
|
17.06
|
Granted
|
|
1,571,505
|
|
|
|
3.26
|
Vested
|
|
(45,914
|
)
|
|
|
22.52
|
Forfeited
|
|
(13,847
|
)
|
|
|
7.78
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
1,648,424
|
|
|
$
|
3.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average remaining recognition period
|
|
3.5 years
|
|
|
|
|
The balance of unearned compensation
related to restricted stock shares as of June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009,
was $5.6 million and $1.2 million, respectively.
The following table presents
stock-based compensation expense for the periods shown:
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Restricted stock expense
|
|
$
|
443
|
|
$
|
275
|
|
$
|
677
|
|
$
|
620
|
Stock option expense
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
281
|
Total stock-based compensation
expense
|
|
$
|
487
|
|
$
|
471
|
|
$
|
803
|
|
$
|
901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No income tax benefit was recognized in the
income statement for restricted stock compensation expense in the three months
and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $105,000 and $236,000 for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009. There was no cash received from stock
option exercises for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
respectively. The Company had no tax benefits from disqualifying dispositions
involving incentive stock options, the exercise of non-qualified stock options,
and the vesting and release of restricted stock for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
- 10 -
3. INVESTMENT
SECURITIES
The following tables present the
available for sale investment portfolio as of June 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009:
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
Amortized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Gross
Gains
|
|
Gross
Losses
|
|
Fair
Value
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
$
|
14,588
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
14,688
|
U.S. Government agency securities
|
|
|
249,423
|
|
|
1,425
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
250,848
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
14,465
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(4,791
|
)
|
|
|
9,674
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
293,080
|
|
|
7,967
|
|
|
(562
|
)
|
|
|
300,485
|
Obligations of state and political
subdivisions
|
|
|
56,274
|
|
|
2,563
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
|
|
58,564
|
Equity investments and other securities
|
|
|
11,475
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11,972
|
Total
|
|
$
|
639,305
|
|
$
|
12,552
|
|
$
|
(5,626
|
)
|
|
$
|
646,231
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
Amortized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Gross
Gains
|
|
Gross
Losses
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
$
|
24,907
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
25,007
|
U.S. Government agency securities
|
|
|
104,168
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
(480
|
)
|
|
|
103,988
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
14,436
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(4,683
|
)
|
|
|
9,753
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
344,179
|
|
|
3,013
|
|
|
(2,898
|
)
|
|
|
344,294
|
Obligations of state and political
subdivisions
|
|
|
67,651
|
|
|
2,562
|
|
|
(195
|
)
|
|
|
70,018
|
Equity investments and other securities
|
|
|
9,274
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
9,217
|
Total
|
|
$
|
564,615
|
|
$
|
5,977
|
|
$
|
(8,315
|
)
|
|
$
|
562,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2010, the fair value of
the securities in the investment portfolio was $646.2 million while the
amortized cost was $639.3 million, reflecting a net unrealized gain in the
portfolio of $6.9 million. At December 31, 2009, the fair value and amortized
cost of securities in the investment portfolio were $562.3 million and $564.6
million, respectively, reflecting a net unrealized loss of $2.3
million.
In the first quarter of 2009, the Company
recorded other-than-temporary-impairment (“OTTI”) charges totaling $.2 million
pretax comprised of $.1 million relating to an investment in a Lehman Brothers
bond held in our corporate securities portfolio, and $.1 million for an
investment in Freddie Mac preferred stock held in our equity and other
securities portfolio. Both of these investments were sold in the second quarter
of 2009 for no additional gain or loss.
The corporate securities portfolio had a $4.8
million net unrealized loss at June 30, 2010. The unrealized loss was associated
with the decline in market value of our four investments in pooled trust
preferred securities issued primarily by banks and insurance companies. An
increase in liquidity and credit spreads, including certain issuer defaults, and
an extension of expected cash flows, including issuer elections to defer
interest payments, contributed to the unrealized loss associated with these
securities which had an amortized cost of $14.0 million and a $9.2 million
estimated fair value at June 30, 2010. Compared to December 31, 2009, the value
of these securities decreased slightly due to a modest increase in credit
spreads and expected duration of cash flows during the first half of 2010. These
securities have several features that reduce credit risk, including seniority
over certain tranches in the same pool and the benefit of certain collateral
coverage tests. Based on our current estimates of the future default
rate
s
for the underlying collateral, we believe
these features are sufficient to protect the Company’s securities from
experiencing any credit losses.
- 11 -
3. INVESTMENT
SECURITIES (continued)
The following tables provide the
fair value and gross unrealized losses on securities available for sale,
aggregated by category and length of time the individual securities have been in
a continuous unrealized loss position:
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Less than 12
months
|
|
12 months or
more
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
As of June 30, 2010
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Losses
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Losses
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Losses
|
Corporate securities
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
9,174
|
|
$
|
(4,791
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,174
|
|
$
|
(4,791
|
)
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
3,697
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
5,228
|
|
|
(534
|
)
|
|
|
8,925
|
|
|
(562
|
)
|
Obligations of state and political
subdivisions
|
|
|
1,322
|
|
|
(204
|
)
|
|
|
1,944
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
3,266
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,019
|
|
$
|
(232
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,346
|
|
$
|
(5,394
|
)
|
|
$
|
21,365
|
|
$
|
(5,626
|
)
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Less than 12
months
|
|
12 months or
more
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Losses
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Losses
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Losses
|
U.S. Government agency
securities
|
|
$
|
65,422
|
|
$
|
(480
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
65,422
|
|
$
|
(480
|
)
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9,253
|
|
|
(4,683
|
)
|
|
|
9,253
|
|
|
(4,683
|
)
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
136,313
|
|
|
(2,074
|
)
|
|
|
5,882
|
|
|
(824
|
)
|
|
|
142,195
|
|
|
(2,898
|
)
|
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
|
|
|
2,470
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
1,866
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
4,336
|
|
|
(195
|
)
|
Equity and other securities
|
|
|
4,736
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,736
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
208,941
|
|
$
|
(2,662
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,001
|
|
$
|
(5,653
|
)
|
|
$
|
225,942
|
|
$
|
(8,315
|
)
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Less than 12
months
|
|
12 months or
more
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
As of June 30, 2009
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Losses
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Losses
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Losses
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
$
|
4,290
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
4,290
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
U.S. Government agency securities
|
|
|
26,037
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
26,037
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,802
|
|
|
(5,099
|
)
|
|
|
8,802
|
|
|
(5,099
|
)
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
44,182
|
|
|
(557
|
)
|
|
|
25,879
|
|
|
(1,817
|
)
|
|
|
70,061
|
|
|
(2,374
|
)
|
Obligations of state and political
subdivisions
|
|
|
10,195
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
3,015
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
|
|
13,210
|
|
|
(408
|
)
|
Equity and other securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,964
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
1,964
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
84,704
|
|
$
|
(795
|
)
|
|
$
|
39,660
|
|
$
|
(7,240
|
)
|
|
$
|
124,364
|
|
$
|
(8,035
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2010, the Company had
nine investment securities with an amortized cost of $21.7 million and an
unrealized loss of $5.4 million that have been in a continuous unrealized loss
position for more than 12 months. The $4.8 million unrealized loss in the
corporate securities category was due to the decline in market value for the
pooled trust preferred securities.
There were a total of five
securities in Bancorp’s investment portfolio with an amortized cost of $5.3
million and a total unrealized loss of $.2 million at June 30, 2010, that have
been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than 12 months. The
unrealized loss on these investment securities was predominantly caused by
increases in interest rates or credit spreads subsequent to purchase. The fair
value of most of our securities fluctuates as market interest rates
change.
Based on management’s review and
evaluation of the Company’s debt securities, the Company does not intend to sell
any debt securities which have an unrealized loss, it is unlikely the Company
will be required to sell these securities before recovery, and we expect to
recover the entire amortized cost of these impaired securities. Accordingly, the
debt securities with unrealized losses were not considered to have an
OTTI.
At June 30, 2010, and December 31,
2009, the Company had $575.6 and $339.0 million, respectively, in investment
securities being provided as collateral to the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”),
the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (“FRB”), the State of Oregon and the
State of Washington, and others for our borrowings and certain public fund
deposits. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, Bancorp had no reverse
repurchase agreements.
- 12 -
3. INVESTMENT
SECURITIES (continued)
The following table
presents the contractual maturities of the investment securities available for
sale at June 30, 2010:
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Available for
sale
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
Amortized
cost
|
|
Fair
value
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year or less
|
|
$
|
10,223
|
|
$
|
10,279
|
After one year through five years
|
|
|
4,365
|
|
|
4,409
|
After five through ten
years
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Due
after ten years
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Total
|
|
|
14,588
|
|
|
14,688
|
|
U.S. Government agency
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year or less
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
609
|
After one year through five years
|
|
|
218,032
|
|
|
219,294
|
After five through ten
years
|
|
|
30,790
|
|
|
30,945
|
Due
after ten years
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Total
|
|
|
249,423
|
|
|
250,848
|
|
Corporate securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year or less
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
After one year through five years
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
500
|
After five through ten
years
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Due
after ten years
|
|
|
13,965
|
|
|
9,174
|
Total
|
|
|
14,465
|
|
|
9,674
|
|
Obligations of state and political
subdivisions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year or less
|
|
|
5,908
|
|
|
5,992
|
After one year through five years
|
|
|
14,491
|
|
|
15,287
|
After five through ten
years
|
|
|
27,118
|
|
|
28,522
|
Due
after ten years
|
|
|
8,757
|
|
|
8,763
|
Total
|
|
|
56,274
|
|
|
58,564
|
Sub-total
|
|
|
334,750
|
|
|
333,774
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
293,080
|
|
|
300,485
|
Equity investments and other securities
|
|
|
11,475
|
|
|
11,972
|
Total securities
|
|
$
|
639,305
|
|
$
|
646,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities may have
expected maturities that will differ from contractual maturities because
borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call
or prepayment penalties.
- 13 -
4. LOANS AND
ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
The composition and carrying value
of the Company’s loan portfolio, excluding loans held for sale, is as
follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
Commercial
|
$
|
312,170
|
|
|
$
|
370,077
|
|
Real estate construction
|
|
74,158
|
|
|
|
99,310
|
|
Real estate mortgage
|
|
362,287
|
|
|
|
374,668
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
837,033
|
|
|
|
862,193
|
|
Installment and other consumer
|
|
16,384
|
|
|
|
18,594
|
|
Total loans
|
|
1,602,032
|
|
|
|
1,724,842
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
(43,329
|
)
|
|
|
(38,490
|
)
|
Total loans, net
|
$
|
1,558,703
|
|
|
$
|
1,686,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables present
activity in the allowance for credit losses, comprised of the Company’s
allowance for loan losses and reserve for unfunded commitments, for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
Three months ended
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
41,299
|
|
|
$
|
38,463
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
7,758
|
|
|
|
11,393
|
|
Loan charge-offs
|
|
|
(5,236
|
)
|
|
|
(11,770
|
)
|
Loan recoveries
|
|
|
526
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
Net
loan charge-offs
|
|
|
(4,710
|
)
|
|
|
(11,287
|
)
|
Total allowance for credit
losses, end of period
|
|
$
|
44,347
|
|
|
$
|
38,569
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
39,418
|
|
|
$
|
29,934
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
15,392
|
|
|
|
34,524
|
|
Loan charge-offs
|
|
|
(11,662
|
)
|
|
|
(26,836
|
)
|
Loan recoveries
|
|
|
1,199
|
|
|
|
947
|
|
Net
loan charge-offs
|
|
|
(10,463
|
)
|
|
|
(25,889
|
)
|
Total allowance for credit
losses, end of period
|
|
$
|
44,347
|
|
|
$
|
38,569
|
|
Components of allowance for credit
losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
43,329
|
|
|
$
|
37,700
|
|
Reserve for unfunded
commitments
|
|
|
1,018
|
|
|
|
869
|
|
Total allowance for credit
losses
|
|
$
|
44,347
|
|
|
$
|
38,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
GOODWILL
At March 31, 2009, based on
management’s analysis and continued deteriorating economic conditions and the
length of time and amount by which the Company’s book value per share had
exceeded its market value per share, the Company determined it was appropriate
to write off the entire $13.1 million of goodwill related to its acquisition of
Mid-Valley Bank in June, 2006.
- 14 -
6. OTHER REAL ESTATE
OWNED, NET
The following tables summarize Other
Real Estate Owned (“OREO”) for the periods shown:
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Three months
ended
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
Balance, beginning period
|
|
$
|
45,238
|
|
|
$
|
87,189
|
|
Additions to OREO
|
|
|
7,209
|
|
|
|
14,819
|
|
Disposition of OREO
|
|
|
(13,612
|
)
|
|
|
(15,114
|
)
|
Valuation adjustments in the period
|
|
|
(1,257
|
)
|
|
|
(3,064
|
)
|
Total OREO
|
|
$
|
37,578
|
|
|
$
|
83,830
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Six months
ended
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
Balance, beginning period
|
|
$
|
53,594
|
|
|
$
|
70,110
|
|
Additions to OREO
|
|
|
12,212
|
|
|
|
40,750
|
|
Disposition of OREO
|
|
|
(24,612
|
)
|
|
|
(19,205
|
)
|
Valuation adjustments in the period
|
|
|
(3,616
|
)
|
|
|
(7,825
|
)
|
Total OREO
|
|
$
|
37,578
|
|
|
$
|
83,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables
summarize the OREO valuation allowance for the periods shown:
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Three months
ended
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
Balance, beginning period
|
|
$
|
8,003
|
|
|
$
|
7,930
|
|
Valuation adjustments in the period
|
|
|
1,257
|
|
|
|
3,064
|
|
Deductions from the valuation allowance
due to disposition
|
|
|
(2,105
|
)
|
|
|
(1,884
|
)
|
Total OREO valuation allowance
|
|
$
|
7,155
|
|
|
$
|
9,110
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Six months
ended
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
Balance, beginning period
|
|
$
|
9,489
|
|
|
$
|
3,920
|
|
Valuation adjustments in the period
|
|
|
3,616
|
|
|
|
7,825
|
|
Deductions from the valuation allowance
due to disposition
|
|
|
(5,950
|
)
|
|
|
(2,635
|
)
|
Total OREO valuation allowance
|
|
$
|
7,155
|
|
|
$
|
9,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 15 -
7. LOSS PER
SHARE
The loss per share is calculated
under the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation
formula that determines loss per share for each class of common stock and
participating security according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and
participation rights in undistributed earnings. A participating security is an
instrument that may participate in undistributed earnings with common stock. The
Company has issued restricted stock that qualifies as a participating security.
Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss available to common
shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share is computed in the same
manner as basic loss per share except that the denominator is increased to
include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding
if certain shares issuable upon exercise of options and non-vested restricted
stock were included, unless those additional shares would have been
anti-dilutive.
The following tables reconcile the
numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted loss per share
computations:
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share
amounts)
|
|
Three months
ended
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(3,849
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,339
|
)
|
Net loss available to common stock holders
|
|
$
|
(3,849
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,339
|
)
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding -basic
|
|
|
92,123
|
|
|
|
15,522
|
|
Common stock equivalents from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Restricted stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding -diluted
|
|
|
92,123
|
|
|
|
15,522
|
|
|
Basic loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.41
|
)
|
Diluted loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
Common stock equivalent shares excluded
due to anti-dilutive effect
|
|
|
3,197
|
|
|
|
1,922
|
|
|
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share
amounts)
|
|
Six months
ended
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(4,737
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,938
|
)
|
Net loss available to common stock holders
|
|
$
|
(4,737
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,938
|
)
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding -basic
|
|
|
79,693
|
|
|
|
15,504
|
|
Common stock equivalents from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Restricted stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding -diluted
|
|
|
79,693
|
|
|
|
15,504
|
|
|
Basic loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.93
|
)
|
Diluted loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.93
|
)
|
|
Common stock equivalent shares excluded
due to anti-dilutive effect
|
|
|
3,197
|
|
|
|
1,922
|
|
Due to the net loss for the three
months and six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, the diluted loss
per share calculation excluded stock option and restricted shares which amounted
to 3.2 million and 1.9 million shares respectively.
- 16 -
8. COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
The Bank has financial instruments with off
balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs
of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend
credit and standby letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying
degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount
recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Bank’s exposure to credit loss in the
event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for
commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the
contractual or notional amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same
credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as for
on-balance sheet instruments.
The following table summarizes the
Bank’s off balance sheet unfunded commitments as of the dates
shown.
|
Contract or
|
|
Contract or
|
|
Notional Amount
|
|
Notional Amount
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
Financial instruments whose contract
amounts represent credit risk
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit in the form of loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
$
|
249,717
|
|
$
|
260,934
|
Real estate
construction
|
|
11,071
|
|
|
15,044
|
Real estate mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
3,299
|
|
|
4,063
|
Home equity line of credit
|
|
158,287
|
|
|
164,638
|
Total real estate mortgage
loans
|
|
161,586
|
|
|
168,701
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
6,059
|
|
|
10,832
|
Installment and
consumer
|
|
11,431
|
|
|
12,147
|
Other
|
|
8,849
|
|
|
10,363
|
Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees
|
|
9,233
|
|
|
9,491
|
Account overdraft protection
instruments
|
|
114,259
|
|
|
76,919
|
Total
|
$
|
572,205
|
|
$
|
564,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to
lend to a customer, as long as there is no violation of any condition
established in the underlying contracts. Commitments generally have fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee.
Many of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon; therefore total
commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Each
customer’s creditworthiness is evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The amount of
collateral obtained, if deemed necessary upon extension of credit, is based on
the Bank’s credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral held varies, but may
include real property, accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and
equipment, and income-producing commercial properties. The Company maintains a
reserve for unfunded commitments as a component of the allowance for credit
losses.
Standby letters of credit are conditional
commitments issued to support a customer’s performance or payment obligation to
a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is
essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to
customers.
During the second quarter of 2010, the Bank
revised its overdraft protection program resulting in both more efficient
operations and an increase in the availability of this product to our customers.
The modifications to this program contributed to an increase in the overall
amount of outstanding commitments to customers under account overdraft
protection instruments by approximately $37 million from year end
2009.
Interest rates on residential 1-4 family
mortgage loan applications are typically rate locked during the application
stage for periods ranging from 15 to 45 days, the most typical period being 30
days. These loans are locked with various qualified investors under a
best-efforts delivery program. The Company makes every effort to deliver these
loans before their rate locks expire. This arrangement generally requires the
Bank to deliver the loans prior to the expiration of the rate lock. Delays in
funding the loans may require a lock extension. The cost of a lock extension at
times is borne by the borrower and at times by the Bank. These lock extension
costs paid by the Bank are not expected to have a material impact on results of
operations. This activity is managed daily.
Bancorp is periodically party to litigation
arising in the ordinary course of business. Based on information currently known
to management, although there are uncertainties inherent in litigation, we do
not believe there is any legal action to which Bancorp or any of its
subsidiaries is a party that, individually or in the aggregate, will have a
materially adverse effect on Bancorp’s financial condition and results of
operations, cash flows, or liquidity.
- 17 -
9. COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME (LOSS)
The following table displays the
components of comprehensive income (loss) for the periods shown:
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Net loss as reported
|
|
$
|
(3,849
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,339
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,737
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,938
|
)
|
|
Unrealized holding gains on
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period
|
|
|
5,323
|
|
|
|
1,219
|
|
|
|
10,209
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
Tax provision
|
|
|
(2,096
|
)
|
|
|
(453
|
)
|
|
|
(4,009
|
)
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period, net of
tax
|
|
|
3,227
|
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
6,200
|
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
Less: Reclassification adjustment for
gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on
sales of securities
|
|
|
(488
|
)
|
|
|
(635
|
)
|
|
|
(945
|
)
|
|
|
(833
|
)
|
Tax provision
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
Net realized gains on sales of
securities, net of tax
|
|
|
(295
|
)
|
|
|
(391
|
)
|
|
|
(576
|
)
|
|
|
(513
|
)
|
|
Less Reclassification adjustment for
other-than-temporary impairment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
Tax benefit
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
Net other-than temporary loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(917
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,964
|
)
|
|
$
|
887
|
|
|
$
|
(29,878
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. LONG-TERM
BORROWINGS AND JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBT
The following table summarized
Bancorp’s long-term borrowings for the periods shown:
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
FHLB non-putable advances
|
|
$
|
134,199
|
|
$
|
220,699
|
FHLB putable advances
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
30,000
|
Total long-term borrowings
|
|
$
|
164,199
|
|
$
|
250,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term borrowings at June 30,
2010, consists of notes with fixed maturities and structured advances with the
FHLB totaling $164.2 million compared to a December 31, 2009, long-term
borrowings balance of $250.7 million. The decrease in FHLB long-term borrowings
during the first half of 2010 was due to the prepayment of $99.1 million of
short and long term borrowings in the second quarter of 2010. Of the prepayment
amount, $81.5 million represented ten long-term advances. At June 30, 2010,
Bancorp’s remaining total long-term borrowings with fixed maturities, or
non-putable advances, was $134.2 million, with rates ranging from 2.32% to
5.03%. Bancorp also had three structured, or putable, advances totaling $30.0
million, with original terms of five years at a rate of 2.45% to 3.78%. The
scheduled maturities on these structured advances occur in February 2013, August
2013 and March 2014, although the FHLB may under certain circumstances require
payment of these structured advances prior to maturity. Principal payments due
at scheduled maturity of Bancorp’s total long-term borrowings at June 30, 2010,
are $50.1 million in 2012, $71.9 million in 2013 and $42.2 million in
2014.
Bancorp had no outstanding federal
funds purchased from correspondent banks, borrowings from the discount window or
reverse repurchase agreements at June 30, 2010.
- 18 -
10. LONG-TERM
BORROWINGS AND JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBT (continued)
At June 30, 2010, six wholly-owned
subsidiary grantor trusts established by Bancorp had an outstanding balance of
$51.0 million in trust preferred securities. During 2009, the Company exercised
its right to defer regularly scheduled interest payments on outstanding junior
subordinated debentures related to its trust preferred securities. At June 30,
2010, the Company had a balance in other liabilities of $1.2 million in accrued
and unpaid interest expense related to these junior subordinated debentures, and
it may not pay dividends on its capital stock until all accrued but unpaid
interest has been paid in full. The Company had recorded and continues to record
junior subordinated debenture interest expense in long-term borrowings expense.
Under our Written Agreement with the Oregon Department of Consumer and Business
Services, Division of Finance and Corporate Securities (“DFCS”) and FRB, we
cannot resume interest payments on our trust preferred securities without prior
regulatory approval.
The following table is a summary of
current trust preferred securities issued by the grantor trusts and guaranteed
by Bancorp:
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
|
Rate at
|
|
|
|
Next possible
|
Issuance
Trust
|
|
Issuance date
|
|
security
amount
|
|
Rate type
1
|
|
6/30/10
|
|
Maturity date
|
|
redemption date
2
|
West Coast Statutory Trust III
|
|
September 2003
|
|
$
|
7,500
|
|
Variable
|
|
3.49%
|
|
September 2033
|
|
Currently redeemable
|
West Coast Statutory Trust IV
|
|
March 2004
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
Variable
|
|
3.33%
|
|
March 2034
|
|
Currently redeemable
|
West Coast Statutory Trust V
|
|
April 2006
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Variable
|
|
1.97%
|
|
June 2036
|
|
June 2011
|
West Coast Statutory Trust VI
|
|
December 2006
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
Variable
|
|
2.22%
|
|
December 2036
|
|
December 2011
|
West Coast Statutory Trust VII
|
|
March 2007
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
Variable
|
|
2.09%
|
|
March 2037
|
|
March 2012
|
West Coast Statutory Trust VIII
|
|
June 2007
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
Variable
|
|
1.92%
|
|
June 2037
|
|
June 2012
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
51,000
|
|
Weighted rate
|
|
2.40%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
The variable rate
preferred securities reprice quarterly.
2
Securities are
redeemable at the option of Bancorp following these dates.
- 19 -
11. SEGMENT AND
RELATED INFORMATION
Bancorp accounts for intercompany
fees and services at an estimated fair value according to regulatory
requirements for the service provided. Intercompany items relate primarily to
the provision of accounting, human resources, data processing and marketing
services.
Summarized financial information
concerning Bancorp’s reportable segments and the reconciliation to Bancorp’s
consolidated results are shown in the following table. The “Other” column
includes Bancorp’s trust operations and corporate-related items, including
interest expense related to trust preferred securities. Investment in
subsidiaries is netted out of the presentations below. The “Intersegment” column
identifies the intersegment activities of revenues, expenses and other assets
between the “Banking” and “Other” segments.
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Three
months ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
Banking
|
|
Other
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
Consolidated
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
26,798
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
26,816
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
7,626
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,906
|
|
Net
interest income (expense)
|
|
|
19,172
|
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
18,910
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
7,758
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,758
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
9,130
|
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
(285
|
)
|
|
|
9,625
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
22,263
|
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
(285
|
)
|
|
|
22,909
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(1,719
|
)
|
|
|
(413
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,132
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
1,879
|
|
|
|
(162
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,717
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$
|
(3,598
|
)
|
|
$
|
(251
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(3,849
|
)
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
1,966
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,975
|
|
Assets
|
|
$
|
2,501,169
|
|
|
$
|
16,782
|
|
|
$
|
(12,465
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,505,486
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
$
|
1,558,703
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,558,703
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
2,015,996
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(11,896
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,004,100
|
|
Equity
|
|
$
|
305,656
|
|
|
$
|
(38,244
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
267,412
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Three
months ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
Banking
|
|
Other
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
Consolidated
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
28,848
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
28,869
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
8,260
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,655
|
|
Net
interest income (expense)
|
|
|
20,588
|
|
|
|
(374
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
20,214
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
11,393
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11,393
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
5,530
|
|
|
|
706
|
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
5,958
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
24,653
|
|
|
|
869
|
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
25,244
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(9,928
|
)
|
|
|
(537
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(10,465
|
)
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(3,917
|
)
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,126
|
)
|
Net
loss
|
|
$
|
(6,011
|
)
|
|
$
|
(328
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(6,339
|
)
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
1,657
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,661
|
|
Assets
|
|
$
|
2,609,687
|
|
|
$
|
9,462
|
|
|
$
|
(5,666
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,613,483
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
$
|
1,879,328
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,879,328
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
2,114,250
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(4,883
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,109,367
|
|
Equity
|
|
$
|
212,852
|
|
|
$
|
(44,186
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
168,666
|
|
- 20 -
11. SEGMENT AND
RELATED INFORMATION (continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Six months
ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
Banking
|
|
Other
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
Consolidated
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
53,979
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
54,014
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
13,921
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
14,471
|
|
Net
interest income (expense)
|
|
|
40,058
|
|
|
|
(515
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
39,543
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
15,392
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15,392
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
15,046
|
|
|
|
1,559
|
|
|
|
(572
|
)
|
|
|
16,033
|
|
Noninterest expense
(1)
|
|
|
42,759
|
|
|
|
1,817
|
|
|
|
(572
|
)
|
|
|
44,004
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(3,047
|
)
|
|
|
(773
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,820
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
1,219
|
|
|
|
(302
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$
|
(4,266
|
)
|
|
$
|
(471
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(4,737
|
)
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
4,141
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
4,159
|
|
Assets
|
|
$
|
2,501,169
|
|
|
$
|
16,782
|
|
|
$
|
(12,465
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,505,486
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
$
|
1,558,703
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,558,703
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
2,015,996
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(11,896
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,004,100
|
|
Equity
|
|
$
|
305,656
|
|
|
$
|
(38,244
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
267,412
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Six months
ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
Banking
|
|
Other
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
Consolidated
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
57,434
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
57,477
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
16,249
|
|
|
|
884
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17,133
|
|
Net
interest income (expense)
|
|
|
41,185
|
|
|
|
(841
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
40,344
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
34,524
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
34,524
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
9,487
|
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
(557
|
)
|
|
|
10,306
|
|
Noninterest expense
(1)
|
|
|
59,435
|
|
|
|
1,740
|
|
|
|
(557
|
)
|
|
|
60,618
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(43,287
|
)
|
|
|
(1,205
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(44,492
|
)
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(14,084
|
)
|
|
|
(470
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(14,554
|
)
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(29,203
|
)
|
|
$
|
(735
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(29,938
|
)
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
2,579
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,587
|
|
Assets
|
|
$
|
2,609,687
|
|
|
$
|
9,462
|
|
|
$
|
(5,666
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,613,483
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
$
|
1,879,328
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,879,328
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
2,114,250
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(4,883
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,109,367
|
|
Equity
|
|
$
|
212,852
|
|
|
$
|
(44,186
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
168,666
|
|
(1)
The Banking segment
includes $13.1 million due to the impairment of goodwill as discussed in Note
5.
- 21 -
12. FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENT AND FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
A financial instrument is defined as cash,
evidence of an ownership interest in an entity, or a contract that conveys or
imposes the contractual right or obligation to either receive or deliver cash or
another financial instrument. Examples of financial instruments included in
Bancorp’s balance sheet are cash, federal funds sold, debt and equity
securities, loans, demand, savings and other interest-bearing deposits, notes
and debentures. Examples of financial instruments which are not included in the
Bancorp balance sheet are commitments to extend credit and standby letters of
credit.
Fair value is defined as
the price that would be received to sell an
asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date.
Accounting standards require the fair value of
deposit liabilities with no stated maturity, such as demand deposits, NOW and
money market accounts, to equal the carrying value of these financial
instruments and does not allow for the recognition of the inherent value of core
deposit relationships when determining fair value.
Bancorp has estimated fair value based on
quoted market prices where available. In cases where quoted market prices were
not available, fair values were based on the quoted market price of a financial
instrument with similar characteristics, the present value of expected future
cash flows or other valuation techniques that utilize assumptions which are
subjective and judgmental in nature. Subjective factors include, among other
things, estimates of cash flows, the timing of cash flows, risk and credit
quality characteristics, interest rates and liquidity premiums or discounts.
Accordingly, the results may not be precise, and modifying the assumptions may
significantly affect the values derived. Further, fair values may or may not be
realized if a significant portion of the financial instruments were sold in a
bulk transaction or a forced liquidation. Therefore, any aggregate unrealized
gains or losses should not be interpreted as a forecast of future earnings or
cash flows. Furthermore, the fair values disclosed should not be interpreted as
the aggregate current value of Bancorp.
The following methods and assumptions were
used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which
it is practicable to estimate that value:
Cash and cash
equivalents
- The carrying
amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Trading securities
–
Trading securities held at June 30, 2010, are
related solely to bonds, equity securities and mutual funds held in a Rabbi
Trust for benefit of the Company’s deferred compensation plans. Fair values for
trading securities are based on quoted market prices.
Investment securities
- For substantially all securities within the categories U.S. Treasuries,
U.S Government agencies, mortgage-backed, obligations of state and political
subdivisions, and equity investments and other securities held for investment
purposes, fair values are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes if
available. When quoted market prices are not readily accessible or available,
the use of alternative approaches, such as matrix or model pricing or indicators
from market makers, is used. If a quoted market price is not available due to
illiquidity, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar
securities or other modeling techniques. If neither a quoted market price nor
market prices for similar securities are available, fair value is estimated by
discounting expected cash flows using a market derived discount rate as of the
valuation date.
Our level 3 assets consist of pooled trust
preferred securities and auction rate securities. The fair values of these
securities were estimated using the discounted cash flow method. The fair value
for these securities used inputs for base case default, recovery and prepayment
rates to estimate the probable cash flows for the security. The estimated cash
flows were discounted using a rate for comparably rated securities adjusted for
an additional liquidity premium.
Loans
- The fair
value of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the
current rate at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar
credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. An additional liquidity
discount is also incorporated to more closely align the fair value with observed
market prices.
Impaired loans
- A
loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events,
it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due (both
interest and principal) according to the contractual terms of the loan
agreement. Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected
future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or, as a
practical expedient, at the loan’s observable market price or the fair market
value of the collateral. A significant portion of the Bank's impaired loans are
measured using the fair market value of the collateral.
Bank owned life insurance
- The carrying amount is the cash surrender value of all policies, which
approximates fair value.
Other real estate
owned
- Management obtains
third party appraisals as well as independent fair market value assessments from
realtors or persons involved in selling OREO in determining the fair value of
particular properties. Accordingly, the valuation of OREO is subject to
significant external and internal judgment. Management periodically reviews OREO
to determine whether the property continues to be carried at the lower of its
recorded book value or fair value.
- 22 -
12. FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENT AND FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)
Goodwill
–
The method used to determine the impairment
charge taken first quarter 2009 involved a two step process. The first step
estimated fair value using a combination of quoted market price and an estimate
of a control premium. It was determined that the estimated fair value of the
Company’s Banking reporting unit was less than its book value and the carrying
amount of the Company’s Banking reporting unit goodwill exceeded its implied
fair value. The second step calculated the implied fair value of goodwill which
required allocation of the fair value to all of the assets and liabilities of
the reporting unit, including any unrecognized intangible assets, in a
hypothetical analysis.
Deposit
liabilities
- The fair
value of demand deposits, savings accounts and other deposits is the amount
payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of time deposits is
estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining
maturities.
Short-term
borrowings
- The carrying
amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value given the short-term nature of
these financial instruments.
Long-term
borrowings
- The fair
value of the long-term borrowings is estimated by discounting the future cash
flows using the current rate at which similar borrowings with similar remaining
maturities could be made.
Junior subordinated
debentures
- The fair
value of the fixed rate junior subordinated debentures and trust preferred
securities approximates the pricing of a preferred security at current market
prices.
Commitments to extend
credit, standby letters of credit and financial guarantees
- The majority of our commitments to extend
credit carry current market interest rates if converted to loans.
The tables below
present fair value information on certain assets broken down by recurring or
nonrecurring measurement status. Recurring assets are initially measured at fair
value and are required to be reflected at fair value in the financial statements
at each reporting date. Assets measured on a nonrecurring basis are assets that
due to an event or circumstance were required to be re-measured at fair value
after initial recognition in the financial statements at some time during the
reporting period.
Assets are classified
as level 1-3 based on the lowest level of input that has a significant effect on
fair value. The following definitions describe the level 1-3 categories for
inputs used in the tables presented below.
-
Quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets (Level 1): Inputs that are quoted
unadjusted prices in active markets for identical assets that the Company has
the ability to access at the measurement date. An active market for the asset
is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with
sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing
basis.
-
Other observable
inputs (Level 2): Inputs that reflect the assumptions market participants
would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data
obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity including quoted
prices for similar assets, quoted prices for securities in inactive markets
and inputs derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data
by correlation or other means.
-
Significant
unobservable inputs (Level 3): Inputs that reflect the reporting entity's own
estimates about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the
asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the
circumstances.
- 23
-
12. FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENT AND FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)
The following tables
present fair value measurements for assets that are measured at fair value on a
recurring basis subsequent to initial recognition for the periods
shown:
|
|
|
|
Fair value
measurements at June 30, 2010, using
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted prices in active
|
|
Other observable
|
|
Significant unobservable
|
|
Total fair value
|
|
markets for identical assets
|
|
inputs
|
|
inputs
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
(Level
1)
|
|
(Level
2)
|
|
(Level
3)
|
Trading securities
|
$
|
677
|
|
$
|
677
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
Available for sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
securities
|
|
14,688
|
|
|
14,688
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
U.S. Government
agency securities
|
|
250,848
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
250,848
|
|
|
-
|
Corporate
securities
|
|
9,674
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
9,674
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
|
300,485
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
300,485
|
|
|
-
|
Obligations of
state and political subdivisions
|
|
58,564
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
57,562
|
|
|
1,002
|
Equity
investments and other securities
|
|
11,972
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
11,972
|
|
|
-
|
Total recurring assets measured at fair value
|
$
|
646,908
|
|
$
|
15,365
|
|
$
|
620,867
|
|
$
|
10,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value
measurements at December 31, 2009, using
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted prices in active
|
|
Other observable
|
|
Significant unobservable
|
|
Total fair value
|
|
markets for identical assets
|
|
inputs
|
|
inputs
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
(Level
1)
|
|
(Level
2)
|
|
(Level
3)
|
Trading securities
|
$
|
731
|
|
$
|
731
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
Available for sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
securities
|
|
25,007
|
|
|
25,007
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
U.S. Government
agency securities
|
|
103,988
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
103,988
|
|
|
-
|
Corporate
securities
|
|
9,753
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
9,753
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
|
344,294
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
344,294
|
|
|
-
|
Obligations of
state and political subdivisions
|
|
70,018
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
69,045
|
|
|
973
|
Equity
investments and other securities
|
|
9,217
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
9,216
|
|
|
-
|
Total recurring assets measured at fair value
|
$
|
563,008
|
|
$
|
25,739
|
|
$
|
526,543
|
|
$
|
10,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company did not
have any transfers between level 1, level 2, or level 3 instruments during the
period. In addition, the Company had no material changes in valuation techniques
for recurring and nonrecurring assets measured at fair value from the quarter
ended June 30, 2010.
- 24
-
12. FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENT AND FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)
The following table
represents a reconciliation of level 3 instruments for assets that are measured
at fair value on a recurring basis for the three and six months ended June 30,
2010, and June 30, 2009:
|
Three months ended June 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses)
|
|
gains (losses) from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in other
|
|
adjustment for
|
|
Purchases,
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31,
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
impairment of
|
|
Issuances, and
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2010
|
|
income
|
|
securities
|
|
Settlements
|
|
Balance June
30, 2010
|
Corporate securities
|
$
|
10,231
|
|
$
|
(557
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
9,674
|
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
|
|
993
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,002
|
Fair value
|
$
|
11,224
|
|
$
|
(548
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
10,676
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses)
|
|
gains (losses) from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in other
|
|
adjustment for
|
|
Purchases,
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1,
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
impairment of
|
|
Issuances, and
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2010
|
|
income
|
|
securities
|
|
Settlements
|
|
Balance June
30, 2010
|
Corporate securities
|
$
|
9,753
|
|
$
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
9,674
|
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
|
|
973
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,002
|
Fair value
|
$
|
10,726
|
|
$
|
(50
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
10,676
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains included in
|
|
gains (losses) from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
adjustment for
|
|
Purchases,
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31,
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
impairment of
|
|
Issuances, and
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2009
|
|
income
|
|
securities
|
|
Settlements
|
|
Balance June
30, 2009
|
Corporate securities
|
$
|
7,852
|
|
$
|
1,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
9,302
|
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Fair value
|
$
|
7,852
|
|
$
|
1,450
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
9,302
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses included
|
|
gains from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in other
|
|
adjustment for
|
|
Purchases,
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1,
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
impairment of
|
|
Issuances, and
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2009
|
|
income
|
|
securities
|
|
Settlements
|
|
Balance June
30, 2009
|
Corporate securities
|
$
|
9,520
|
|
$
|
(286
|
)
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
9,302
|
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Fair value
|
$
|
9,520
|
|
$
|
(286
|
)
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
9,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain assets are
measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis after initial recognition such as
loans held for sale, loans measured for impairment and OREO. For the six months
ended June 30, 2010, loans held for sale were subject to the lower of cost or
market method of accounting. However, there were no impairments recognized on
loans held for sale in second quarter 2010. For the six months ended June 30,
2010, certain loans included in Bancorp’s loan portfolio were deemed impaired.
In addition, during the second quarter, certain properties were written down by
a total of $1.3 million to reflect additional decreases in estimated fair market
value subsequent to the time such properties were placed into OREO. The fair
values for OREO in the table below reflect only the fair value of the properties
and do not consider estimated costs to sell.
- 25
-
12. FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENT AND FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)
There were no
nonrecurring level 1 or 2 fair value measurements for the three or six months
ended June 30, 2010, or the full year 2009. The following tables represent the
level 3 fair value measurements for nonrecurring assets for the periods
presented:
|
Three months ended June 30,
2010
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Impairment
|
|
Fair Value
(1)
|
Loans measured for impairment
|
$
|
5,236
|
|
$
|
20,822
|
OREO
|
|
1,257
|
|
|
26,277
|
Total nonrecurring assets measured at fair value
|
$
|
6,493
|
|
$
|
47,099
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
2010
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Impairment
|
|
Fair Value
(1)
|
Loans measured for impairment
|
$
|
11,662
|
|
$
|
52,865
|
OREO
|
|
3,616
|
|
|
44,350
|
Total nonrecurring assets measured at fair value
|
$
|
15,278
|
|
$
|
97,215
|
|
|
Twelve months ended December 31,
2009
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Impairment
|
|
Fair Value
(1)
|
Loans measured for impairment
|
$
|
82,345
|
|
$
|
212,311
|
OREO
|
|
18,562
|
|
|
162,153
|
Goodwill
|
|
13,059
|
|
|
-
|
Total nonrecurring assets measured at fair value
|
$
|
113,966
|
|
$
|
374,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Fair value
excludes cost to sell collateral.
- 26
-
12. FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENT AND FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)
The estimated fair
values of financial instruments at June 30, 2010, are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Carrying
Value
|
|
Fair
Value
|
FINANCIAL ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
168,897
|
|
$
|
168,897
|
Trading securities
|
|
677
|
|
|
677
|
Investment securities
|
|
646,231
|
|
|
646,231
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
12,148
|
|
|
12,148
|
Net loans (net of allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
and including
loans held for sale)
|
|
1,558,703
|
|
|
1,469,571
|
Bank owned life insurance
|
|
24,829
|
|
|
24,829
|
|
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
$
|
2,004,100
|
|
$
|
2,007,236
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
164,199
|
|
|
171,325
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures-variable
|
|
51,000
|
|
|
26,315
|
The estimated fair
values of financial instruments at December 31, 2009, are as
follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Carrying
Value
|
|
Fair
Value
|
FINANCIAL ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
303,097
|
|
$
|
303,097
|
Trading securities
|
|
731
|
|
|
731
|
Investment securities
|
|
567,277
|
|
|
567,277
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
12,148
|
|
|
12,148
|
Net loans (net of allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
and including
loans held for sale)
|
|
1,687,528
|
|
|
1,575,033
|
Bank owned life insurance
|
|
24,417
|
|
|
24,417
|
|
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
$
|
2,146,884
|
|
$
|
2,151,850
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
12,600
|
|
|
12,600
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
250,699
|
|
|
256,841
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures-variable
|
|
51,000
|
|
|
17,850
|
- 27
-
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following
discussion should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial
statements and related notes to those statements of West Coast Bancorp
(“Bancorp” or the “Company”) that appear under the heading “Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data” in Bancorp's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009 (“2009 10-K”), as well as the unaudited consolidated
financial statements for the current quarter found under Item 1 above.
Forward-Looking Statement Disclosure
Statements in this
Quarterly Report of the Company regarding future events or performance are
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “PSLRA”) and are made pursuant to the safe
harbors of the PSLRA. The Company’s actual results could be quite different from
those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Any statements
containing the words “could,” “may,” “should,” “plan,” “believes,”
“anticipates,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “expects,” “projects,” “potential,” or
“continue,” or words of similar import, constitute “forward-looking statements,”
as do any other statements that expressly or implicitly predict future events,
results, or performance. Factors that could cause results to differ from results
expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements include, among others,
risks discussed in our 2009 10-K under Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors”, and in
this report under Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors” below, as well as the
following specific factors:
-
General economic
conditions, whether national or regional, and conditions in real estate
markets, that may affect the demand for our loan and other products, lead to
further declines in credit quality and additional loan losses, and negatively
affect the value and salability of the real estate that we own or is the
collateral for many of our loans;
-
Changing bank
regulatory conditions, policies, or programs, whether arising as new
legislation or regulatory initiatives, that could lead to restrictions on
activities of banks generally or West Coast Bank (the “Bank”) in particular,
increased costs for financial institutions, including higher Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) deposit insurance premiums and compliance
costs, the elimination or expiration of programs expanding deposit insurance
coverage, increased regulation, or outright prohibition of certain income
producing activities;
-
Competitive
factors, including competition with community, regional and national financial
institutions, that may lead to pricing pressures that reduce yields the Bank
earns on loans and increase rates the Bank pays on deposits, the loss of our
most valued customers, defection of key employees or groups of employees, or
other losses;
-
Increasing or
decreasing interest rate environments, including the slope and level of the
yield curve, that could hinder new loan origination, decrease our borrowers’
ability to repay loans, and lead to decreases in net interest margin, lower
net interest and fee income, including lower gains on sales of loans, and
changes in the value of the Company’s investment securities; and
-
Changes or failures
in technology or third party vendor relationships in important revenue
production or service areas or increases in required investments in technology
that could reduce our revenues, increase our costs, or lead to disruptions in
our business.
Furthermore,
forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties related to the
Company’s ability to, among other things: dispose of properties or other assets
obtained through foreclosures at expected prices and within a reasonable period
of time; manage its technology platforms and third party vendor relationships
and control related costs; attract and retain key personnel; generate loan and
deposit balances at projected spreads; sustain fee generation including gains on
sales of loans; maintain asset quality and control risk; limit the amount of net
loan charge-offs; adapt to changing customer deposit, investment and borrowing
behaviors; control expense growth; and monitor and manage the Company’s
financial reporting, operating and disclosure control environments.
Readers are cautioned
not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which reflect
management’s analysis only as of the date of the statements. The Company does
not intend to publicly revise or update forward-looking statements to reflect
events or circumstances that arise after the date of this report.
Readers should
carefully review all disclosures we file from time to time with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
- 28 -
Update on Enforcement
Actions
On July 15, 2010, the
Order to Cease and Desist (“Consent Order”) issued to the Bank effective on
October 22, 2009 by the Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services
Division, Finance and Corporate Securities (“DFCS”) and the FDIC was
terminated.
Termination of the
Consent Order relieved the Bank of the requirements included in the Consent
Order. Those requirements are summarized in our most recent Form 10-K. In
addition to relieving the Bank of the requirements of the Consent Order,
termination of the Consent Order has increased, and we expect will continue to
increase, the willingness of third parties to do business with the Bank or to do
so on terms more favorable to the Bank. Although the Consent Order has been
terminated, we expect the DFCS and FDIC to implement an informal agreement, such
as a memorandum of understanding, with the Bank.
Bancorp remains
subject to a Written Agreement with the DFCS and the Federal Reserve Bank of San
Francisco (“FRB”). The requirements of the Written Agreement are also summarized
in our most recent Form 10-K.
Discretionary Equity Issuance
Program
On June 24, 2010 the
Program commenced a Discretionary Equity Issuance Program (the “Program”) to
enable the Company to offer for sale from time to time shares of its common
stock, no par value per share (the “common stock”) for aggregate gross sales
proceeds of up to $30.0 million. In connection with the program, we sold,
through Sandler O’Neill + Partners, L.P. (“Sandler O’Neill”), as our sales
agent, an aggregate of 2.8 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate
gross sales price of approximately $7.9 million and at an average gross sales
price per share of approximately $2.80. Bancorp contributed $6.0 million of the
common stock sales proceeds to the Bank in the second quarter. We paid Sandler
O’Neill a commission equal to 2.75% of the gross sales price per share for
shares sold under the Program. Shares of our common stock issued under the
Program were sold pursuant to the Sales Agency Agreement, dated June 23, 2010,
between us and Sandler O’Neill (the “Sales Agency Agreement”) and were issued
pursuant to a prospectus supplement, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “SEC”) on June 24, 2010, to the prospectus filed with the SEC on
April 30, 2010 as part of the Company’s registration statement on Form S-3 (File
No. 333-166441). We terminated the Program and the Sales Agency Agreement on
August 5, 2010.
The following table
presents sales of common shares under the Program- as noted in the table below,
900 shares were sold in the third quarter of 2010 prior to the Program’s
termination:
Trade date
|
Number of shares
sold
|
|
Average price
per share
|
6/24/2010
|
38,100
|
|
$
|
2.90
|
6/25/2010
|
2,765,208
|
|
|
2.80
|
7/13/2010
|
900
|
|
|
2.80
|
Total
|
2,804,208
|
|
$
|
2.80
|
- 29
-
Critical Accounting Policies
Management has
identified as our most critical accounting policies, the calculation of our
allowance for credit losses, valuation of other real estate owned (“OREO”), and
estimates relating to income taxes. Each of these policies are discussed in our
2009 10-K under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operation – Critical Accounting Policies.”
Overview
Second Quarter 2010
Financial Review.
The
Company’s operating results in second quarter 2010 included several favorable
events that began last year. During second quarter 2010, we recorded:
-
A net loss of $3.8
million compared to a loss of $6.3 million in second quarter 2009;
-
A reduction of long
term borrowings as a result of prepayment of $99.1 million of Federal Home
Loan Bank (“FHLB”) borrowings, which resulted in a prepayment fee of $2.3
million in the second quarter;
-
An average rate
paid on total deposits of .64%, a decline from 1.23% in second quarter 2009;
-
A provision for
credit losses of $7.8 million, a reduction of $3.6 million from $11.4 million
for the same quarter in 2009;
-
Net loan
charge-offs of $4.7 million, a decline from $11.3 million in second quarter
2009; and
-
OREO valuation
adjustments and losses on sale of $.2 million, as compared to $3.7 million in
second quarter 2009.
Management continued
to proactively implement and execute certain strategies that have resulted in
significant strengthening of the Company’s balance sheet, including:
-
Increasing the
Bank’s total and tier 1 risk-based capital ratios to 17.10% and 15.84%,
respectively, at June 30, 2010, up from 10.81% and 9.56% at June 30, 2009;
-
Improving the
Bank’s leverage ratio from 8.39% a year ago, to 11.43% at June 30, 2010. The
previously noted FHLB prepayment late in the second quarter will, all else
being equal, contribute to further improvement in the Bank’s leverage ratio by
September 30, 2010;
-
Decreasing real
estate construction loan balances 63% from $127.4 million at June 30, 2009, to
$74.2 million, or less than 5% of total loans, at June 30, 2010;
-
Reducing total
nonperforming assets by 45% or $94.4 million over the past twelve months to
$116.2 million at quarter end; and
-
Adding 2,100
deposit checking accounts during the second quarter of 2010 surpassing 100,000
accounts at June 30, 2010
.
Results of
Operations
Three and six months ended June, 2010 and 2009
Net Loss.
Net losses for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2010, were $3.8 and $4.7 million, respectively, as
compared to net losses of $6.3 and $29.9 for the three and six months ended June
30, 2009. The loss per diluted share for the three and six months ended June 30,
2010, were $0.04 and $0.06, respectively, as compared to $0.41 and $1.91 for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009. For additional detail regarding
calculation of our net loss per share in the current quarter and year to date,
see Note 7 “Loss Per Share” of our interim financial statements included under
Item 1 of this report.
- 30 -
Net Interest Income.
The following table sets
forth, for the periods indicated, information with regard to (1) average
balances of assets and liabilities, (2) the total dollar amounts of interest
income on interest earning assets and interest expense on interest bearing
liabilities, (3) resulting yields and rates, (4) net interest income and (5) net
interest spread. Nonaccrual loans have been included in the tables as loans
carrying a zero yield. Loan fees are recognized as income using the interest
method over the life of the loan.
|
|
Three
months ended
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
6/30/2010
|
|
6/30/2009
|
|
3/31/2010
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Interest
|
|
Yield/
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Earned/
|
|
Yield/
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Interest
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
Earned/Paid
|
|
Rate
1
|
|
Balance
|
|
Paid
|
|
Rate
1
|
|
Balance
|
|
Earned/Paid
|
|
Rate
1
|
ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
earning balances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
due from
banks
|
|
$
|
249,007
|
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
0.26%
|
|
$
|
69,216
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
0.28%
|
|
$
|
227,278
|
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
0.26%
|
Federal funds
sold
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
0.11%
|
|
|
5,781
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
0.07%
|
|
|
12,912
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
0.09%
|
Taxable
securities
2
|
|
|
521,139
|
|
|
|
3,688
|
|
2.84%
|
|
|
238,860
|
|
|
|
1,893
|
|
3.18%
|
|
|
505,745
|
|
|
|
3,611
|
|
2.90%
|
Nontaxable
securities
3
|
|
|
57,530
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
5.89%
|
|
|
70,950
|
|
|
|
1,045
|
|
5.91%
|
|
|
63,781
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
5.83%
|
Loans,
including fees
4
|
|
|
1,646,068
|
|
|
|
22,416
|
|
5.46%
|
|
|
1,975,521
|
|
|
|
26,247
|
|
5.33%
|
|
|
1,703,597
|
|
|
|
22,842
|
|
5.44%
|
Total interest
earning assets
|
|
|
2,477,349
|
|
|
|
27,111
|
|
4.39%
|
|
|
2,360,328
|
|
|
|
29,235
|
|
4.97%
|
|
|
2,513,313
|
|
|
|
27,518
|
|
4.44%
|
|
Allowance for
loan losses
|
|
|
(42,895
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,393
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,957
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and
equipment
|
|
|
27,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
178,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
2,640,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,566,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,677,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
bearing demand
|
|
$
|
332,850
|
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
0.14%
|
|
$
|
298,012
|
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
0.26%
|
|
$
|
321,070
|
|
|
$
|
155
|
|
0.20%
|
Savings
|
|
|
104,052
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
0.25%
|
|
|
87,624
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
0.89%
|
|
|
98,075
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
0.49%
|
Money
market
|
|
|
657,454
|
|
|
|
989
|
|
0.60%
|
|
|
599,417
|
|
|
|
2,057
|
|
1.38%
|
|
|
642,594
|
|
|
|
1,345
|
|
0.85%
|
Time
deposits
|
|
|
431,669
|
|
|
|
2,103
|
|
1.95%
|
|
|
614,472
|
|
|
|
3,912
|
|
2.55%
|
|
|
507,706
|
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
2.14%
|
Total interest
bearing deposits
|
|
|
1,526,025
|
|
|
|
3,275
|
|
0.86%
|
|
|
1,599,525
|
|
|
|
6,359
|
|
1.59%
|
|
|
1,569,445
|
|
|
|
4,292
|
|
1.11%
|
|
Short-term
borrowings
5
|
|
|
17,407
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
8.04%
|
|
|
28,791
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
2.41%
|
|
|
13,100
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
4.49%
|
Long-term
borrowings
5
6
|
|
|
295,803
|
|
|
|
4,282
|
|
5.81%
|
|
|
269,160
|
|
|
|
2,123
|
|
3.16%
|
|
|
301,199
|
|
|
|
2,127
|
|
2.86%
|
Total
borrowings
|
|
|
313,210
|
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
5.93%
|
|
|
297,951
|
|
|
|
2,296
|
|
3.09%
|
|
|
314,299
|
|
|
|
2,272
|
|
2.93%
|
Total interest
bearing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
liabilities
|
|
|
1,839,235
|
|
|
|
7,906
|
|
1.72%
|
|
|
1,897,476
|
|
|
|
8,655
|
|
1.83%
|
|
|
1,883,744
|
|
|
|
6,564
|
|
1.41%
|
Demand
deposits
|
|
|
523,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
478,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
519,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
|
|
17,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
2,379,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,392,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,422,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
equity
|
|
|
260,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stockholders'
equity
|
|
$
|
2,640,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,566,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,677,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,954
|
|
|
|
Net interest
spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.67%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.14%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.03%
|
|
Net interest
margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.11%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.50%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.38%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
Yield/rate
calculations have been based on more detailed information and therefore may not
recompute exactly due to rounding.
2
Second quarter 2010
does not includes
Federal Home
Loan Bank (FHLB) stock balances. Second quarter 2009 and first quarter 2010
includes FHLB stock balances.
3
Interest earned on
nontaxable securities has been computed on a 35% tax equivalent basis. The tax
equivalent basis adjustment for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
was $.30 million and $.37 million, respectively, and $.32 million for three
months ended March 31, 2010.
4
Includes balances of
loans held for sale and nonaccrual loans.
5
Includes portion of
$2.3 million prepayment fee in connection with prepaying $99.1 million in FHLB
borrowings in the second quarter of 2010.
6
Includes junior
subordinated debentures with average balance of $51 million for June 30, 2010,
June 30, 2009, and March 31, 2010.
- 31
-
Second quarter 2010
net interest income of $18.9 million declined $1.3 million from the same quarter
in 2009. This decline included a $2.3 million FHLB prepayment fee in connection
with prepaying $99.1 million of FHLB borrowings. Net interest income on a tax
equivalent basis was $19.2 million for the current quarter, down from $20.6
million in the same quarter of 2009. Average interest earning assets increased
$117.0 million, or 5.0%, to $2.48 billion in the second quarter of 2010 from
$2.36 billion for the same period in 2009, while average interest bearing
liabilities decreased $58.2 million, or 3.1%, to $1.84 billion.
The second quarter
2010 net interest margin of 3.11% compressed 39 basis points from second quarter
2009. Without the prepayment fee of $2.3 million, the net interest margin would
have been 3.48%, substantially unchanged from second quarter 2009. The
considerable year-over-year shift in average earning assets from higher yielding
loan balances to cash equivalents and investment securities balances, which
collectively earned 317 basis points less than the loan portfolio, was
substantially offset by a 73 basis points reduction in the rate paid on interest
bearing deposits from the same quarter of 2009. Reflecting an underlying
positive trend, the year-over-year second quarter spread between the yields
earned on loans and rates paid on deposits expanded 86 basis points. As a result
of lower FHLB borrowings and current market conditions, we anticipate the third
quarter net interest margin will improve over the second quarter margin even
excluding the effects of the FHLB prepayment fee.
Net interest income
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $39.5 million, a decrease of $.8
million from the same period last year reflecting the impact of the FHLB
prepayment fee and the shift in average earning assets from higher yielding
loans to cash equivalents.
At June 30, 2010, we
remain slightly asset sensitive over the next twelve month measurement period,
meaning that earning assets mature or reprice more quickly than interest bearing
liabilities over this period. Whether we will be able to continue recent
positive trends in our net interest margin will depend on our ability to
generate new loans while continuing to control our costs of funds, both of which
will depend on economic conditions and interest rate trends. For more
information see the discussion under the heading “Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures about Market Risk” in our 2009 10-K.
Provision for Credit
Losses.
Bancorp recorded
provision for credit losses for the second quarters of 2010 and 2009 of $7.8
million and $11.4 million, respectively. The Company continued to experience a
reduction in loan net charge-offs, particularly in the real estate construction
category. The provision for credit losses was $15.4 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 compared to $34.5 million in the same period last year.
Whether we will be able to continue the trend of decreasing provision for credit
losses will depend primarily on economic conditions and the interest rate
environment, as an increase in interest rates could put pressure on the ability
of our borrowers to repay loans. For more information, see the discussion under
the subheading “Allowance for Credit Losses and Net Loan Charge-offs” below.
- 32 -
Noninterest
Income
. Total noninterest
income of $9.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, increased $3.6
million from $6.0 million in the second quarter of 2009. The increase was
primarily due to a $3.5 million reduction in OREO valuation adjustments and
gains or losses associated with OREO dispositions. OREO valuation adjustments of
$1.3 million included a $.5 million write down of OREO to comply with a DFCS
requirement that all OREO properties be written down by 5% each calendar year
independent of the properties’ appraised value. Future financial results will be
heavily dependent on the Company's ability to dispose of its OREO properties
quickly and at prices that are in line with current expectations. Excluding the
effects of OREO valuation adjustments and gains or losses on OREO dispositions,
the Company’s noninterest income increased $.2 million. The $.5 million or 22%
growth in payment system revenues and $.2 million or 20% increase in trust and
investment services revenues more than offset the $.5 million decline in gains
on sales of loans.
Noninterest income
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $16.0 million compared to $10.3
million for the same period in 2009. The increase in noninterest income was
primarily due to a $6.2 million decrease in losses from OREO valuation
adjustments and net losses associated with disposing OREO property. The
following table illustrates the components and change in noninterest income for
the periods shown:
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
June 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
March 31,
|
|
Change
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges
on deposit accounts
|
$
|
4,213
|
|
|
$
|
4,133
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
2%
|
|
$
|
3,596
|
|
|
$
|
617
|
|
17%
|
Payment systems
related revenue
|
|
2,875
|
|
|
|
2,359
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
22%
|
|
|
2,536
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
13%
|
Trust and
investment services revenues
|
|
1,167
|
|
|
|
971
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
979
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
19%
|
Gains on sales
of loans
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
|
(450
|
)
|
|
-60%
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
117%
|
Other
|
|
785
|
|
|
|
787
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
0%
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
4%
|
Gain on sales
of securities
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
-23%
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
7%
|
Total
|
|
9,834
|
|
|
|
9,641
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
8,466
|
|
|
|
1,368
|
|
16%
|
|
OREO gains
(losses) on sale
|
|
1,048
|
|
|
|
(620
|
)
|
|
|
1,668
|
|
|
269%
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
747
|
|
248%
|
OREO valuation
adjustments
|
|
(1,257
|
)
|
|
|
(3,063
|
)
|
|
|
1,806
|
|
|
59%
|
|
|
(2,359
|
)
|
|
|
1,102
|
|
47%
|
Total
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
(3,683
|
)
|
|
|
3,474
|
|
|
94%
|
|
|
(2,058
|
)
|
|
|
1,849
|
|
90%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
$
|
9,625
|
|
|
$
|
5,958
|
|
|
$
|
3,667
|
|
|
62%
|
|
$
|
6,408
|
|
|
$
|
3,217
|
|
50%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest
Expense.
Noninterest
expense for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was $22.9 million, a decrease
of $2.3 million compared to $25.2 million for the same period in 2009. The
primary factors in this decline were a $1.2 million special FDIC assessment that
increased other noninterest expense in the second quarter last year and lower
OREO, equipment, and professional expenses in the most recent quarter. Personnel
cost remained unchanged over the two periods while payment system related
expenses grew $.2 million or 21% related to increased transaction
activity.
Noninterest expense
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $44.0 million, a decrease of $16.6
million compared to $60.6 million for the same period in 2009. The decrease in
noninterest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same
period in 2009 was primarily due to a goodwill impairment charge during the
first quarter of 2009. We continue to make efforts to increase operating
efficiencies and control expenses without negative effects on our customers. We
expect our noninterest expenses will continue to be affected by expenses
associated with elevated levels of nonperforming assets.
The following table
illustrates the components and changes in noninterest expense for the periods
shown:
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
Change
|
|
March 31,
|
|
Change
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and
employee benefits
|
$
|
11,322
|
|
$
|
11,267
|
|
$
|
(55
|
)
|
|
0%
|
|
$
|
11,175
|
|
$
|
(147
|
)
|
|
-1%
|
Equipment
|
|
1,606
|
|
|
1,850
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
13%
|
|
|
1,576
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
-2%
|
Occupancy
|
|
2,249
|
|
|
2,295
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
2,184
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
-3%
|
Payment systems
related expense
|
|
1,212
|
|
|
998
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
-21%
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
(208
|
)
|
|
-21%
|
Professional
fees
|
|
1,161
|
|
|
1,371
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
15%
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
-35%
|
Postage,
printing and office supplies
|
|
737
|
|
|
826
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
8%
|
Marketing
|
|
738
|
|
|
696
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
-6%
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
-7%
|
Communications
|
|
381
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
6%
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
0%
|
Other
noninterest expense
|
|
3,503
|
|
|
5,537
|
|
|
2,034
|
|
|
37%
|
|
|
2,422
|
|
|
(1,081
|
)
|
|
-45%
|
Total
|
$
|
22,909
|
|
$
|
25,244
|
|
$
|
2,335
|
|
|
9%
|
|
$
|
21,095
|
|
$
|
(1,814
|
)
|
|
-9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 33
-
Changing business
conditions, increased costs in connection with retention of, or a failure to
retain key employees, lower loan production volumes causing deferred loan
origination costs to decline, or a failure to manage our operating and control
environments could adversely affect our ability to limit expense growth in the
future.
Income
Taxes.
The Company
recorded an income tax provision for the three months ended June 30, 2010, of
$1.7 million, primarily due to adjustments made to the Company’s 2009 tax
estimates in conjunction with finalizing its 2009 income tax return, compared to
a tax benefit of $4.1 during the second quarter of 2009. For the six months
period ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a tax benefit of $.9 million
compared to a tax benefit of $14.5 million in the first six months of 2009. The
Company received a tax refund of $27.9 million in the second quarter of 2010
after filing its 2009 tax return.
As of June 30, 2010,
the Company maintained a valuation allowance of $22.8 million against the
deferred tax asset balance of $27.7 million, for a net deferred tax asset of
$4.9 million. This amount represented a $1.8 million increase from March 31,
2010. The $1.8 million increase in the net deferred tax asset was recognized as
an income tax benefit and was the result of a $4.6 million increase in the gross
unrealized gain in the Company’s investment portfolio during the second quarter
2010. The Company’s future net deferred tax asset and income tax provision or
benefit will continue to be impacted by changes in the gross unrealized gain on
the Company’s investment portfolio.
The following table
illustrates the components of the provision (benefit) for income taxes for the
periods shown:
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Change
|
|
2010
|
|
Change
|
Benefit for income taxes excluding deferred tax asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
valuation
allowance
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(4,126
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,126
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Provision (benefit) for taxes from deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tax asset
valuation allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain
on securities
|
|
(1,798
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,798
|
)
|
|
|
(800
|
)
|
|
|
(998
|
)
|
Increase in
deferred tax assets-tax return adjustments
|
|
3,515
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,515
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,515
|
|
Total provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
$
|
1,717
|
|
|
$
|
(4,126
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,843
|
|
|
$
|
(800
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 34
-
Balance Sheet Overview
Balance sheet highlights are as follows:
-
Total assets were $2.5 billion as
of June 30, 2010, down from $2.7 billion at December 31,
2009;
-
Total loans decreased to $1.6
billion, a decline of 7% or $123 million from the balance at December 31,
2009, primarily due to declines of $58 million or 16% in commercial loan
balances, $25 million or 25% in real estate construction loan balances, and
$25 million or 3% in commercial real estate loan balances;
-
The combined balance of total cash
and cash equivalents and investment securities was $815 million at June 30,
2010, a reduction of $50 million since year end 2009 but an increase of $297
million from June 30, 2009;
-
Total deposits decreased to $2.0
billion at June 30, 2010, a $143 million or 7% decline since year end 2009,
which was primarily due to planned contraction in time deposit balances, and
which contributed to our overall decline in cost of funds.
Our balance sheet management efforts are
focused on continuing to reduce nonperforming assets, maintaining a strong
capital position, retaining sufficient liquidity, and limiting loan
concentrations and include efforts to:
-
Continue to resolve nonaccrual
loans, and dispose of OREO properties, including potential loan
sales;
-
Shift our earning asset mix
towards loan balances by increasing loan production within our concentration
parameters to targeted customer segments;
-
Manage the size of our balance
sheet and maintain regulatory capital ratios at high levels until we have more
certainty regarding economic conditions; and
-
Prudently reduce excess liquidity,
in part by reducing or eliminating existing higher cost funding categories,
including wholesale term deposits.
We continue to expect further contraction in
our construction loan portfolio given continued high unemployment in our markets
and decreased demand for new homes and commercial properties, and our efforts to
reduce nonaccrual loan balances. We expect to continue a cautious approach to
lending in the commercial construction, non-owner occupied term commercial real
estate and housing related commercial sectors. Our ability to achieve loan
growth will be dependent on many factors, including the effects of competition,
economic conditions in our markets, health of the real estate market, retention
of key personnel and valued customers, and our ability to close loans in the
pipeline.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Total cash and cash equivalents declined $134.2 million or 44% since
December 31, 2009. This occurred primarily as a consequence of the second
quarter prepayment of $99.1 million in FHLB borrowings originally scheduled to
mature between September 2010 and May 2012.
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
June 30,
|
|
% of
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
% of
|
|
Change
|
|
June 30,
|
|
% of
|
|
|
2010
|
|
total
|
|
2009
|
|
total
|
|
Amount
|
|
%
|
|
2009
|
|
total
|
Cash and Cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from
banks
|
|
$
|
45,685
|
|
27%
|
|
$
|
47,708
|
|
16%
|
|
$
|
(2,023
|
)
|
|
-4%
|
|
$
|
49,181
|
|
33%
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
13,431
|
|
8%
|
|
|
20,559
|
|
7%
|
|
|
(7,128
|
)
|
|
-35%
|
|
|
6,643
|
|
4%
|
Interest-bearing deposits in
other banks
|
|
|
109,781
|
|
65%
|
|
|
234,830
|
|
77%
|
|
|
(125,049
|
)
|
|
-53%
|
|
|
92,458
|
|
63%
|
Total cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
$
|
168,897
|
|
100%
|
|
|
303,097
|
|
100%
|
|
$
|
(134,200
|
)
|
|
-44%
|
|
$
|
148,282
|
|
100%
|
- 35
-
Investment Portfolio
The composition and carrying value of Bancorp’s investment portfolio is
as follows:
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
Cost
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Gain/(Loss)
|
|
Cost
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Gain/(Loss)
|
|
Cost
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Gain/(Loss)
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
$
|
14,588
|
|
$
|
14,688
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
24,907
|
|
$
|
25,007
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
45,223
|
|
$
|
45,292
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
U.S.
Government agency securities
|
|
|
249,423
|
|
|
250,848
|
|
|
1,425
|
|
|
|
104,168
|
|
|
103,988
|
|
|
(180
|
)
|
|
|
38,942
|
|
|
38,943
|
|
|
1
|
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
14,465
|
|
|
9,674
|
|
|
(4,791
|
)
|
|
|
14,436
|
|
|
9,753
|
|
|
(4,683
|
)
|
|
|
14,401
|
|
|
9,302
|
|
|
(5,099
|
)
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
293,080
|
|
|
300,485
|
|
|
7,405
|
|
|
|
344,179
|
|
|
344,294
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
198,814
|
|
|
196,969
|
|
|
(1,845
|
)
|
Obligations of state and political
subdivisions
|
|
|
56,274
|
|
|
58,564
|
|
|
2,290
|
|
|
|
67,651
|
|
|
70,018
|
|
|
2,367
|
|
|
|
68,994
|
|
|
70,144
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
Equity
and other securities
|
|
|
11,475
|
|
|
11,972
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
9,274
|
|
|
9,217
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
9,298
|
|
|
9,264
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Total Investment Portfolio
|
|
$
|
639,305
|
|
$
|
646,231
|
|
$
|
6,926
|
|
|
$
|
564,615
|
|
$
|
562,277
|
|
$
|
(2,338
|
)
|
|
$
|
375,672
|
|
$
|
369,914
|
|
$
|
(5,758
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2010, the estimated fair
value of the investment portfolio was $646.2 million, compared to $562.3 million
at 2009 year end, an increase of 14.9% or $84.0 million. The net unrealized gain
on the investment portfolio was $6.9 million at June 30, 2010, as compared to a
net unrealized loss of $2.3 million at year end 2009. Higher unrealized gains in
the Company’s mortgage-backed securities portfolio due to declining market
interest rates led to the current unrealized net gain in the investment
portfolio.
The investment portfolio increased $276.3
million since June, 2009. Over the past twelve months, the Company invested cash
from loan repayments and capital raising activities primarily in mortgage-backed
securities and U.S. Government agency securities. These securities were
purchased to manage the Company’s interest rate sensitivity position while
providing sufficient cash flows for future loan growth. The expected duration of
the investment securities portfolio was relatively short at 1.8 years at June
30, 2010.
For additional detail regarding our
investment securities portfolio, see Note 3 “Investment Securities” and Note 12
“Fair Value Measurement and Fair Values of Financial Instruments” of our interim
financial statements included under Item 1 of this report.
Loan Portfolio
The composition of the Bank’s loan
portfolio is as follows for the periods shown:
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
June 30,
|
|
% of total
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
% of total
|
|
Change
|
|
June 30,
|
|
% of total
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
loans
|
|
2009
|
|
loans
|
|
Amount
|
|
2009
|
|
loans
|
|
Amount
|
Commercial loans
|
|
$
|
312,170
|
|
19.5%
|
|
$
|
370,077
|
|
21.5%
|
|
$
|
(57,907
|
)
|
|
$
|
428,852
|
|
22.4%
|
|
$
|
(116,682
|
)
|
Commercial real estate
construction
|
|
|
22,096
|
|
1.4%
|
|
|
29,574
|
|
1.8%
|
|
|
(7,478
|
)
|
|
|
71,945
|
|
3.8%
|
|
|
(49,849
|
)
|
Residential real estate construction
|
|
|
52,062
|
|
3.2%
|
|
|
69,736
|
|
4.0%
|
|
|
(17,674
|
)
|
|
|
129,588
|
|
6.7%
|
|
|
(77,526
|
)
|
Total
real estate construction loans
|
|
|
74,158
|
|
4.6%
|
|
|
99,310
|
|
5.8%
|
|
|
(25,152
|
)
|
|
|
201,533
|
|
10.5%
|
|
|
(127,375
|
)
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
73,867
|
|
4.6%
|
|
|
74,977
|
|
4.3%
|
|
|
(1,110
|
)
|
|
|
83,941
|
|
4.4%
|
|
|
(10,074
|
)
|
Nonstandard mortgage
|
|
|
14,348
|
|
0.9%
|
|
|
20,108
|
|
1.2%
|
|
|
(5,760
|
)
|
|
|
23,916
|
|
1.2%
|
|
|
(9,568
|
)
|
Home equity line of credit
|
|
|
274,072
|
|
17.2%
|
|
|
279,583
|
|
16.1%
|
|
|
(5,511
|
)
|
|
|
280,366
|
|
14.6%
|
|
|
(6,294
|
)
|
Total
real estate mortgage loans
|
|
|
362,287
|
|
22.7%
|
|
|
374,668
|
|
21.6%
|
|
|
(12,381
|
)
|
|
|
388,223
|
|
20.2%
|
|
|
(25,936
|
)
|
Commercial real estate loans
|
|
|
837,033
|
|
52.2%
|
|
|
862,193
|
|
50.0%
|
|
|
(25,160
|
)
|
|
|
878,379
|
|
45.8%
|
|
|
(41,346
|
)
|
Installment and other consumer loans
|
|
|
16,384
|
|
1.0%
|
|
|
18,594
|
|
1.1%
|
|
|
(2,210
|
)
|
|
|
20,041
|
|
1.1%
|
|
|
(3,657
|
)
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
1,602,032
|
|
100.0%
|
|
$
|
1,724,842
|
|
100%
|
|
$
|
(122,810
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,917,028
|
|
100.0%
|
|
$
|
(314,996
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bank’s total loan portfolio was $1.60
billion at June 30, 2010, declines of $122.8 million or 7% since year end 2009
and $315.0 million or 16% from a year ago. The declines reflect the prolonged
weakness of the economy which continues to negatively impact loan demand as well
as the Company’s on-going efforts to reduce exposure in selective loan segments.
As a result, the real estate construction loan portfolio contracted $127.4
million or 63% over the past 12 months and measured 5% of total loans at quarter
end compared to 11% at June 30, 2009. The Company also continued to exit a
number of higher risk rated commercial loans in the most recent quarter, which
contributed to the $116.7 million or 27% contraction in the commercial loan
category from June 30 a year ago. Additionally, commercial credit line
commitment utilization at most recent quarter end remained low compared to
historical levels.
- 36 -
Interest and fees earned on our loan portfolio
are our primary source of revenue, and it will be very important that we improve
loan originations and increase loan balances in order to increase overall
revenues. With the Company’s strong capital and liquidity positions, we are
hopeful the economy will allow for an increased level of prudent loan
originations to qualified borrowers throughout the remainder of
2010.
At June 30, 2010, the Bank had outstanding
loans of $4.5 million to persons serving as directors, executive officers,
principal stockholders and their related interests. These loans, when made, were
on substantially the same terms, including interest rates, maturities and
collateral, as comparable loans made to other customers of the Bank. At June 30,
2010, and December 31, 2009, Bancorp had no bankers’ acceptances.
Below is a discussion of our loan portfolio by category.
Commercial
. The
composition of commercial loans as the following periods:
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
of total
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
of total
|
|
Change
|
|
change
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
of total
|
Commercial lines of credit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
commitment
|
|
$
|
447,309
|
|
|
|
$
|
492,394
|
|
|
|
$
|
(45,085
|
)
|
|
-9%
|
|
$
|
540,124
|
|
|
Outstanding balance
|
|
|
188,306
|
|
60%
|
|
|
221,779
|
|
60%
|
|
|
(33,473
|
)
|
|
-15%
|
|
|
260,464
|
|
61%
|
Utilization %
|
|
|
42.1%
|
|
|
|
|
45.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48.2%
|
|
|
|
Commercial term loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
commitment
|
|
$
|
123,864
|
|
|
|
$
|
148,298
|
|
|
|
$
|
(24,434
|
)
|
|
-16%
|
|
$
|
168,388
|
|
|
Outstanding balance
|
|
|
123,864
|
|
40%
|
|
|
148,298
|
|
40%
|
|
|
(24,434
|
)
|
|
-16%
|
|
|
168,388
|
|
39%
|
|
Total commercial lines and
loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
commitment
|
|
$
|
571,173
|
|
|
|
$
|
640,692
|
|
|
|
$
|
(69,519
|
)
|
|
-11%
|
|
$
|
708,512
|
|
|
Outstanding balance
|
|
|
312,170
|
|
100%
|
|
|
370,077
|
|
100%
|
|
|
(57,907
|
)
|
|
-16%
|
|
|
428,852
|
|
100%
|
At June 30, 2010, total commitments for
commercial lines and loans were $571.2 million down from $640.7 million as of
December 31, 2009. The outstanding balance of commercial loans and lines was
$312.2 million or approximately 19% of the Company’s total loan portfolio. The
total commercial lines and loans balance decreased by $57.9 million or 16% from
$370.1 million at year end 2009.
At June 30, 2010, commercial lines of credit
accounted for $188.3 million or 60% of total outstanding commercial loans and
lines, while commercial term loans accounted for $123.9 million or 40% of the
total. Over the past 12 months, commercial line utilization declined from 48% to
42% or towards the low end of our customer’s utilization range over the past few
years.
The Company has elected to limit new
loan originations to customers in certain sectors, including businesses related
to the housing industry, and exit certain high risk client relationships.
However, in terms of our long term strategy we expect the commercial loan
portfolio to be an important contributor to growth in future revenues and we
expect that the capital raised over the past year will support our efforts to
strategically pursue opportunities in targeted commercial lending
segments.
- 37 -
Real Estate Construction.
At June 30, 2010, the balance of real estate construction loans was $74.2
million, down $25.1 million, or 25%, from $99.3 million at December 31, 2009.
Total real estate construction loans represented less than 5% of the total loan
portfolio at the end of the second quarter, down from 6% at December 31, 2009
and 11% a year ago.
Until the excess supply and market demand for
new homes is more in balance, there will be limited demand for new residential
construction loans in the market place. Limited financing for vertical
construction may be made available, particularly under existing commitments to
certain builders.
Additional detail regarding construction and
land loans is provided in the tables below. Land loans are carried in the Bank’s
residential mortgage and commercial real estate portfolios, depending on the
purpose of the loan, but such loans are included below due to their relationship
to construction loans generally.
|
|
West Coast Bancorp
|
|
|
Construction and land loans
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
loan
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
segment
2
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
2
|
|
Amount
|
|
segment
2
|
Components of residential construction
and land loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
loans
1
|
|
$
|
11,087
|
|
18%
|
|
$
|
14,909
|
|
18%
|
|
$
|
17,910
|
|
12%
|
Site development
|
|
|
17,965
|
|
28%
|
|
|
22,590
|
|
26%
|
|
|
56,997
|
|
39%
|
Vertical construction
|
|
|
34,098
|
|
54%
|
|
|
47,193
|
|
56%
|
|
|
72,624
|
|
49%
|
Total residential construction and land loans
|
|
$
|
63,150
|
|
100%
|
|
$
|
84,692
|
|
100%
|
|
$
|
147,531
|
|
100%
|
|
Components of commercial construction
and land loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
loans
1
|
|
$
|
20,618
|
|
48%
|
|
$
|
20,487
|
|
41%
|
|
$
|
19,593
|
|
21%
|
Site development
|
|
|
366
|
|
1%
|
|
|
607
|
|
1%
|
|
|
607
|
|
1%
|
Vertical construction
|
|
|
21,742
|
|
51%
|
|
|
29,008
|
|
58%
|
|
|
71,439
|
|
78%
|
Total commercial construction and land loans
|
|
$
|
42,726
|
|
100%
|
|
$
|
50,102
|
|
100%
|
|
$
|
91,639
|
|
100%
|
|
Components of total construction and
land loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
loans
1
|
|
$
|
31,705
|
|
30%
|
|
$
|
35,396
|
|
26%
|
|
$
|
37,503
|
|
16%
|
Site development
|
|
|
18,331
|
|
17%
|
|
|
23,197
|
|
17%
|
|
|
57,604
|
|
24%
|
Vertical construction
|
|
|
55,840
|
|
53%
|
|
|
76,201
|
|
57%
|
|
|
144,063
|
|
60%
|
Total construction and land loans
|
|
$
|
105,876
|
|
100%
|
|
$
|
134,794
|
|
100%
|
|
$
|
239,170
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
Land loans
represent balances that are carried in the Company's residential real
estate mortgage and commercial real estate loan
portfolios.
|
2
Calculations
have been based on more detailed information and therefore may not
recompute exactly due to rounding.
|
In terms of the total combined construction and land loan portfolio,
$55.8 million or 53% was for vertical construction purposes, with the land
component at 30% and site development at 17%. Vertical construction accounted
for the majority of the loans within both the residential and commercial
categories. At June 30, 2010, land loans represented approximately 2% of the
Company’s total loan portfolio. Also, at the end of the second quarter 2010, the
Bank was within the Interagency Guidelines for Real Estate Lending and the
Commercial Real Estate Lending Joint Guidance policy guidelines which set forth
a 100% limit for real estate construction lending relative to the sum of Tier 1
capital and allowance for credit losses.
- 38 -
Real Estate Mortgage.
The following table presents the
components of our real estate mortgage loan portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
loan
|
|
|
|
|
loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
loan
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
category
|
|
Amount
|
|
category
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
Amount
|
|
category
|
Mortgage
|
|
$
|
73,867
|
|
20%
|
|
$
|
74,977
|
|
20%
|
|
$
|
(1,110
|
)
|
|
-1%
|
|
$
|
83,941
|
|
22%
|
Nonstandard mortgage product
|
|
|
14,348
|
|
4%
|
|
|
20,108
|
|
5%
|
|
|
(5,760
|
)
|
|
-29%
|
|
|
23,916
|
|
6%
|
Home equity loans and lines of
credit
|
|
|
274,072
|
|
76%
|
|
|
279,583
|
|
75%
|
|
|
(5,511
|
)
|
|
-2%
|
|
|
280,366
|
|
72%
|
Total real estate
mortgage
|
|
$
|
362,287
|
|
100%
|
|
$
|
374,668
|
|
100%
|
|
$
|
(12,381
|
)
|
|
-3%
|
|
$
|
388,223
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2010, real estate mortgage loan
balances were $362.3 million or approximately 23% of the Company’s total loan
portfolio. This loan category included $14.3 million in nonstandard mortgage
loans, a decline from $20.1 million at December 31, 2009 and $23.9 million a
year ago. At June 30, 2010, mortgage loans measured $73.9 million or 20% of
total real estate mortgage loans, $32.3 million of which were standard
residential mortgage loans to homeowners. The remaining $41.6 million in
mortgage loans were associated with commercial interests utilizing residences as
collateral. Such commercial interests included $23.9 million related to
businesses, $4.4 million related to condominiums, and $8.6 million related to
ownership of residential land.
Home equity lines and loans
represented about 76% or $274.1 million of the real estate mortgage portfolio at
June 30, 2010, relatively unchanged from year end 2009. As shown below, the
overall home equity line utilization measured approximately 61% at June 30,
2010, and the utilization was fairly consistent by year of origination with the
exception of lower utilization on credits extended in 2010 and prior to
2005.
|
|
Year of
Origination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 &
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
6/30/10
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Earlier
|
|
Total
|
Home Equity
Lines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
|
|
$
|
10,423
|
|
$
|
31,916
|
|
$
|
61,635
|
|
$
|
78,130
|
|
$
|
79,046
|
|
$
|
58,369
|
|
$
|
83,816
|
|
$
|
403,335
|
|
Outstanding Balance
|
|
|
5,769
|
|
|
20,121
|
|
|
38,014
|
|
|
51,371
|
|
|
50,246
|
|
|
36,803
|
|
|
43,091
|
|
|
245,415
|
|
|
Utilization
|
|
|
55.3%
|
|
|
63.0%
|
|
|
61.7%
|
|
|
65.8%
|
|
|
63.6%
|
|
|
63.1%
|
|
|
51.4%
|
|
|
60.8%
|
|
|
Home Equity
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance
|
|
|
1,404
|
|
|
3,222
|
|
|
7,701
|
|
|
6,199
|
|
|
4,102
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
3,756
|
|
|
27,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Home Equity Outstanding
|
|
$
|
7,173
|
|
$
|
23,343
|
|
$
|
45,715
|
|
$
|
57,570
|
|
$
|
54,348
|
|
$
|
37,686
|
|
$
|
46,847
|
|
$
|
272,682
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
For the
purposes of utilization percentages, the outstanding balance does not
include deferred costs and fees of $1.4
million.
|
While delinquencies and charge-offs
in the mortgage loan portfolios have been modest to date, we anticipate that the
extended weakness in the economy coupled with persistent high unemployment in
our markets may lead to increased delinquencies and charge-offs going
forward.
The following table shows home equity lines of
credit and loans by market areas at the date shown and indicates a geographic
distribution of balances representative of our branch presence in these
markets:
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
Region
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent of
total
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent of
total
|
Portland-Beaverton, Oregon / Vancouver,
Washington
|
|
$
|
131,072
|
|
48%
|
|
$
|
135,647
|
|
49%
|
Salem,
Oregon
|
|
|
62,473
|
|
23%
|
|
|
64,241
|
|
23%
|
Oregon non-metropolitan area
|
|
|
27,602
|
|
10%
|
|
|
27,333
|
|
10%
|
Olympia, Washington
|
|
|
19,262
|
|
7%
|
|
|
18,803
|
|
7%
|
Washington non-metropolitan
area
|
|
|
15,376
|
|
5%
|
|
|
15,541
|
|
5%
|
Bend,
Oregon
|
|
|
5,825
|
|
2%
|
|
|
5,665
|
|
2%
|
Other
|
|
|
12,462
|
|
5%
|
|
|
12,353
|
|
4%
|
Total home equity loan and
line portfolio
|
|
$
|
274,072
|
|
100%
|
|
$
|
279,583
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 39 -
Commercial Real Estate.
The composition of commercial real
estate loan portfolio based on collateral type is as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of loan
|
|
|
|
|
% of loan
|
|
|
|
|
% of loan
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
category
|
|
Amount
|
|
category
|
|
Amount
|
|
category
|
Office Buildings
|
|
$
|
185,318
|
|
22.1%
|
|
$
|
193,233
|
|
22.4%
|
|
$
|
189,566
|
|
21.6%
|
Retail
Facilities
|
|
|
111,737
|
|
13.3%
|
|
|
114,697
|
|
13.3%
|
|
|
119,890
|
|
13.6%
|
Commercial/Agricultural
|
|
|
60,822
|
|
7.3%
|
|
|
62,366
|
|
7.2%
|
|
|
64,275
|
|
7.3%
|
Industrial parks and related
|
|
|
60,051
|
|
7.2%
|
|
|
55,955
|
|
6.5%
|
|
|
55,622
|
|
6.3%
|
Medical Offices
|
|
|
59,736
|
|
7.1%
|
|
|
61,636
|
|
7.1%
|
|
|
61,236
|
|
7.0%
|
Multi-Family - 5+ Residential
|
|
|
49,030
|
|
5.9%
|
|
|
50,498
|
|
5.9%
|
|
|
61,342
|
|
7.0%
|
Manufacturing Plants
|
|
|
47,613
|
|
5.7%
|
|
|
55,216
|
|
6.4%
|
|
|
49,709
|
|
5.7%
|
Hotels/Motels
|
|
|
42,448
|
|
5.1%
|
|
|
37,829
|
|
4.4%
|
|
|
38,070
|
|
4.3%
|
Assisted Living
|
|
|
26,268
|
|
3.1%
|
|
|
26,600
|
|
3.1%
|
|
|
20,113
|
|
2.3%
|
Mini
Storage
|
|
|
25,221
|
|
3.0%
|
|
|
25,778
|
|
3.0%
|
|
|
29,395
|
|
3.3%
|
Land Development and Raw Land
|
|
|
20,723
|
|
2.5%
|
|
|
26,594
|
|
3.1%
|
|
|
27,881
|
|
3.2%
|
Food
Establishments
|
|
|
14,897
|
|
1.8%
|
|
|
18,108
|
|
2.1%
|
|
|
18,721
|
|
2.1%
|
Other
|
|
|
133,169
|
|
15.9%
|
|
|
133,683
|
|
15.5%
|
|
|
142,559
|
|
16.2%
|
Total commercial real estate
loans
|
|
$
|
837,033
|
|
100.0%
|
|
$
|
862,193
|
|
100.0%
|
|
$
|
878,379
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The commercial real estate portfolio declined
$25.2 million or 3% from December 31, 2009 to June 30, 2010. At second quarter
end 2010, loans secured by office buildings and retail facilities accounted for
35% of the commercial real estate portfolio, similar to prior periods
shown.
The composition of the commercial real
estate loan portfolio by occupancy type is as follows:
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
Change
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mix
|
|
|
|
|
Mix
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mix
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
Owner occupied
|
|
$
|
402,062
|
|
48%
|
|
$
|
423,031
|
|
49%
|
|
$
|
(20,969
|
)
|
|
-1%
|
|
$
|
450,090
|
|
51%
|
Non-owner occupied
|
|
|
434,971
|
|
52%
|
|
|
439,162
|
|
51%
|
|
|
(4,191
|
)
|
|
1%
|
|
|
428,289
|
|
49%
|
Total commercial real estate loans
|
|
$
|
837,033
|
|
100%
|
|
$
|
862,193
|
|
100%
|
|
$
|
(25,160
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
878,379
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 40 -
The mix between owner occupied and non-owner
occupied commercial real estate has remained fairly stable over the past year.
At June 30, 2010, the Bank was within the Interagency Guidelines for Real Estate
Lending and the Commercial Real Estate Lending Joint Guidance policy guidelines
which set forth a 300% limit for certain commercial real estate lending relative
to the sum of Tier 1 capital and allowance for credit losses, evidencing
available capacity to prudently expand lending in this loan category. The
following table shows the commercial real estate portfolio by property
location:
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Percent of
|
Region
|
|
Amount
|
|
loans
|
|
total
|
Portland-Beaverton, Oregon / Vancouver,
Washington
|
|
$
|
451,126
|
|
745
|
|
53.8%
|
Salem,
Oregon
|
|
|
147,555
|
|
413
|
|
17.6%
|
Oregon non-metropoliton area
|
|
|
60,614
|
|
172
|
|
7.2%
|
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, Washington
|
|
|
39,355
|
|
49
|
|
4.7%
|
Washington non-metropoliton
area
|
|
|
32,193
|
|
116
|
|
3.8%
|
Olympia, Washington
|
|
|
26,066
|
|
79
|
|
3.1%
|
Bend, Oregon
|
|
|
24,300
|
|
26
|
|
2.9%
|
Other
|
|
|
55,823
|
|
83
|
|
6.9%
|
Total commercial real estate loans
|
|
$
|
837,033
|
|
1,683
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As shown in the table above, the distribution
of our commercial real estate portfolio at June 30, 2010 was fairly consistent
with our branch presence in our operating markets.
The following table shows the
commercial real estate portfolio by year of stated maturity:
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Percent of
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
loans
|
|
total
|
2010
|
|
$
|
41,137
|
|
53
|
|
4.9%
|
2011
|
|
|
40,684
|
|
79
|
|
4.9%
|
2012 and after
|
|
|
755,212
|
|
1,551
|
|
90.2%
|
Total commercial real estate
loans
|
|
$
|
837,033
|
|
1,683
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2010, the stated loan maturities
for the remainder of 2010 and in 2011 totaled $81.8 million or a relatively
modest 10% of the $837.0 million total commercial real estate portfolio.
Commercial real estate markets continue to be vulnerable to financial and
valuation pressures that may impact borrowers’ ability to perform consistent
with terms and conditions of the borrower’s loan agreements and limit refinance
options. Declining values of commercial real estate may adversely affect the
ability of borrowers whose loans are maturing to satisfy applicable loan to
value ratios required to renew the loans.
- 41 -
Nonperforming Assets and
Delinquencies
Nonperforming Assets.
Nonperforming assets consist of nonaccrual loans, loans past due more
than 90 days and still accruing interest and OREO. The following table presents
information with respect to total nonaccrual loans by category and OREO for the
periods shown:
|
|
Jun. 30,
2010
|
|
Mar. 31,
2010
|
|
Dec. 31,
2009
|
|
Sept. 30,
2009
|
|
Jun. 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
category
|
|
Amount
|
|
Amount
|
|
Amount
|
|
Amount
|
Commercial loans
|
|
$
|
15,317
|
|
4.9%
|
|
$
|
24,856
|
|
$
|
36,211
|
|
|
49,871
|
|
|
34,396
|
Real
estate construction loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate construction
|
|
|
3,391
|
|
15.3%
|
|
|
3,939
|
|
|
1,488
|
|
|
2,449
|
|
|
2,922
|
Residential real estate
construction
|
|
|
19,465
|
|
37.4%
|
|
|
19,776
|
|
|
22,373
|
|
|
42,277
|
|
|
56,507
|
Total real estate construction
loans
|
|
|
22,856
|
|
30.8%
|
|
|
23,715
|
|
|
23,861
|
|
|
44,726
|
|
|
59,429
|
Real
estate mortgage loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
14,535
|
|
19.7%
|
|
|
9,829
|
|
|
11,563
|
|
|
12,498
|
|
|
14,179
|
Nonstandard mortgage
product
|
|
|
6,121
|
|
42.7%
|
|
|
9,327
|
|
|
8,752
|
|
|
10,810
|
|
|
10,486
|
Home equity line of credit
|
|
|
2,198
|
|
0.8%
|
|
|
2,248
|
|
|
2,036
|
|
|
1,599
|
|
|
1,259
|
Total
real estate mortgage loans
|
|
|
22,854
|
|
6.3%
|
|
|
21,404
|
|
|
22,351
|
|
|
24,907
|
|
|
25,924
|
Commercial real estate loans
|
|
|
17,542
|
|
2.1%
|
|
|
15,322
|
|
|
16,778
|
|
|
12,463
|
|
|
6,905
|
Installment and other consumer loans
|
|
|
74
|
|
0.5%
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
69
|
Total
nonaccrual loans
|
|
|
78,643
|
|
4.9%
|
|
|
85,469
|
|
|
99,345
|
|
|
132,006
|
|
|
126,723
|
90 day
past due and accruing interest
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Total nonperforming loans
|
|
|
78,643
|
|
4.9%
|
|
|
85,469
|
|
|
99,345
|
|
|
132,006
|
|
|
126,723
|
Other
real estate owned
|
|
|
37,578
|
|
|
|
|
45,238
|
|
|
53,594
|
|
|
76,570
|
|
|
83,830
|
Total nonperforming assets
|
|
$
|
116,221
|
|
|
|
$
|
130,707
|
|
$
|
152,939
|
|
$
|
208,576
|
|
$
|
210,553
|
|
Nonperforming loans to total
loans
|
|
|
4.91%
|
|
|
|
|
5.13%
|
|
|
5.76%
|
|
|
7.25%
|
|
|
6.61%
|
Nonperforming assets to total assets
|
|
|
4.64%
|
|
|
|
|
4.91%
|
|
|
5.60%
|
|
|
7.86%
|
|
|
8.06%
|
|
Delinquent loans 30-89 days past
due
|
|
$
|
2,743
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,566
|
|
$
|
8,427
|
|
$
|
13,136
|
|
$
|
16,082
|
Delinquent loans to total loans
|
|
|
0.17%
|
|
|
|
|
0.33%
|
|
|
0.49%
|
|
|
0.72%
|
|
|
0.84%
|
At June 30, 2010, total nonperforming assets
were $116.2 million, or 4.6% of total assets, compared to $152.9 million, or
5.6%, at December 31, 2009, and $210.6 million or 8.1% a year ago. Nonperforming
assets have declined for five consecutive quarters and were down 45% or $94.4
million from $210.6 million at June 30, 2009. The balance of total nonperforming
assets at quarter end reflected write-downs totaling $63 million or 36% from the
original principal loan balance compared to write-downs of 27% twelve months
ago.
Over the past year total nonaccrual loans
declined $48.1 million or 38% to $78.6 million at June 30, 2010. The reduction
was largely due to the Company taking ownership of additional residential site
development and construction properties related to loans which previously were
on nonaccrual status, nonaccrual loan payoffs, and the disposition of certain
large nonaccrual commercial loans. At June 30, 2010, the total nonaccrual loan
portfolio had been written down 25% from the original principal balance compared
to 21% at the end of the second quarter a year ago.
- 42 -
Nonaccrual Construction and Land Loans.
The following table shows the components of
our nonaccrual residential and commercial construction and land loans as of the
dates shown:
|
|
Nonaccrual construction and land
loans
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
Change
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
loan
|
|
|
|
|
loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
loan
|
(Dollars in thousands, unaudited)
|
|
Amount
|
|
segment
|
|
Amount
|
|
segment
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
Amount
|
|
segment
|
Components of residential construction
and land loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
loans
1
|
|
$
|
9,032
|
|
31.7%
|
|
$
|
6,440
|
|
22.4%
|
|
$
|
2,592
|
|
|
40.2%
|
|
$
|
7,629
|
|
11.9%
|
Site development
|
|
|
7,250
|
|
25.4%
|
|
|
8,334
|
|
28.9%
|
|
|
(1,084
|
)
|
|
-13.0%
|
|
|
33,721
|
|
52.6%
|
Vertical construction
|
|
|
12,215
|
|
42.9%
|
|
|
14,040
|
|
48.7%
|
|
|
(1,825
|
)
|
|
-13.0%
|
|
|
22,786
|
|
35.5%
|
Total residential construction and land loans
|
|
$
|
28,497
|
|
100.0%
|
|
$
|
28,814
|
|
100.0%
|
|
$
|
(317
|
)
|
|
-1.1%
|
|
$
|
64,136
|
|
100.0%
|
|
Components of commercial construction
and land loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
loans
1
|
|
$
|
1,233
|
|
26.7%
|
|
|
1,276
|
|
46.2%
|
|
$
|
(43
|
)
|
|
-3.4%
|
|
|
996
|
|
25.4%
|
Site development
|
|
|
366
|
|
7.9%
|
|
|
-
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
-
|
|
0.0%
|
Vertical construction
|
|
|
3,025
|
|
65.4%
|
|
|
1,487
|
|
53.8%
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
103.4%
|
|
|
2,922
|
|
74.6%
|
Total commercial construction and land loans
|
|
$
|
4,624
|
|
100.0%
|
|
$
|
2,763
|
|
100.0%
|
|
$
|
1,861
|
|
|
67.4%
|
|
$
|
3,918
|
|
100.0%
|
|
Components of total construction and
land loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
loans
1
|
|
$
|
10,265
|
|
31.0%
|
|
$
|
7,716
|
|
24.4%
|
|
$
|
2,549
|
|
|
33.0%
|
|
|
8,625
|
|
12.7%
|
Site development
|
|
|
7,616
|
|
23.0%
|
|
|
8,334
|
|
26.4%
|
|
|
(718
|
)
|
|
-8.6%
|
|
|
33,721
|
|
49.6%
|
Vertical construction
|
|
|
15,240
|
|
46.0%
|
|
|
15,527
|
|
49.2%
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
|
-1.8%
|
|
$
|
25,708
|
|
37.7%
|
Total construction and land loans
|
|
$
|
33,121
|
|
100.0%
|
|
$
|
31,577
|
|
100.0%
|
|
$
|
1,544
|
|
|
4.9%
|
|
$
|
68,054
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
Land loans
represent balances that are carried in the Company's residential real
estate mortgage and commercial real estate loan
portfolios.
|
Total nonaccrual construction and land loans declined by $34.9 or over
50% from the prior year. This resulted from the significant reductions in the
construction and land loan balances and a reduction in inflows of such
additional nonaccrual loans. This was particularly the case with the residential
construction and land loan segment, which has represented the majority of the
nonaccrual balances. Reflecting the troubled housing market, $28.5 million of
the $33.1 million in total nonaccrual construction and land loan balances were
related to the residential category. Nonaccrual commercial construction and land
loans were $4.6 million or 10.8% of such loans at June 30, 2010.
- 43 -
OREO.
The following table presents activity in
the total OREO portfolio for the periods shown:
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Total OREO related activity
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Number
|
Full year 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance January 1, 2009
|
|
$
|
70,110
|
|
|
288
|
|
Additions to OREO
|
|
|
74,174
|
|
|
699
|
|
Capitalized
improvements
|
|
|
4,933
|
|
|
-
|
|
Valuation adjustments
|
|
|
(18,562
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
Disposition of OREO
properties
|
|
|
(77,061
|
)
|
|
(315
|
)
|
Ending balance Dec. 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
53,594
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
First Quarter 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to OREO
|
|
$
|
3,847
|
|
|
15
|
|
Capitalized improvements
|
|
|
1,156
|
|
|
-
|
|
Valuation
adjustments
|
|
|
(2,359
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
Disposition of OREO properties
|
|
|
(11,000
|
)
|
|
(91
|
)
|
Ending
balance March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
45,238
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
Second Quarter 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to OREO
|
|
|
5,924
|
|
|
20
|
|
Capitalized improvements
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
|
-
|
|
Valuation
adjustments
|
|
|
(1,257
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
Disposition of OREO properties
|
|
|
(13,612
|
)
|
|
(170
|
)
|
Ending
balance June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
37,578
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
Year to date 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance January 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
53,594
|
|
|
672
|
|
Additions to OREO
|
|
|
9,771
|
|
|
35
|
|
Capitalized
improvements
|
|
|
2,441
|
|
|
-
|
|
Valuation adjustments
|
|
|
(3,616
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
Disposition of OREO
properties
|
|
|
(24,612
|
)
|
|
(261
|
)
|
Ending balance June 30, 2010
|
|
|
37,578
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company’s OREO property disposition
activities continued at a consistent pace. At June 30, 2010, the OREO portfolio
consisted of 446 properties valued at $37.6 million. The quarter end OREO
balance reflected write-downs totaling 52% from the original loan principal
compared to 34% twelve months ago. As shown below, the largest segments of the
OREO balance at June 30, 2010 were homes followed by residential site
development projects. In the quarter just ended, the Company sold two
residential site development properties with a total of 109 lots and a book
value of $4.7 million for a $.4 million gain upon final disposition. The site
development projects remaining in OREO as of quarter end are primarily located
in Vancouver and Washougal, Washington and in Beaverton and Salem, Oregon. For
more information regarding the Company’s OREO, see the discussion under the
subheading “OREO” and “Critical Accounting Policies” included in Item 7 of the
Company’s 2009 10-K.
The following table presents segments of
the OREO portfolio for the periods shown:
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
June 30,
|
|
# of
|
|
March 31,
|
|
# of
|
|
December 31,
|
|
# of
|
|
|
2010
|
|
properties
|
|
2010
|
|
properties
|
|
2009
|
|
properties
|
Homes
|
|
$
|
17,254
|
|
75
|
|
$
|
21,040
|
|
91
|
|
$
|
29,435
|
|
118
|
Residential site developments
|
|
|
7,296
|
|
265
|
|
|
13,488
|
|
400
|
|
|
14,851
|
|
453
|
Lots
|
|
|
4,750
|
|
67
|
|
|
5,114
|
|
71
|
|
|
5,235
|
|
71
|
Land
|
|
|
3,474
|
|
10
|
|
|
2,682
|
|
7
|
|
|
1,607
|
|
7
|
Income producing properties
|
|
|
2,996
|
|
6
|
|
|
1,094
|
|
4
|
|
|
1,255
|
|
4
|
Condominiums
|
|
|
1,111
|
|
12
|
|
|
1,111
|
|
12
|
|
|
982
|
|
12
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
697
|
|
11
|
|
|
709
|
|
11
|
|
|
229
|
|
7
|
Total
|
|
$
|
37,578
|
|
446
|
|
$
|
45,238
|
|
596
|
|
$
|
53,594
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses from the acquisition,
maintenance and disposition of OREO properties are included in other noninterest
expense in the statements of loss. Our operating results will be impacted by our
ability to dispose of OREO properties at prices that are in line with current
valuation expectations. Continued decline in market values in our area would
lead to additional valuation adjustments or losses upon final disposal, which
would have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
- 44 -
Delinquencies.
Bancorp also monitors delinquencies, defined as loan balances 30-89 days
past due, not on nonaccrual status, as an indicator of future nonperforming
assets. Total delinquencies were $2.7 million or .17% of total loans at June 30,
2010, down from $8.4 million or .49% at December 31, 2009 and a reduction from
$16.1 million or .84% at June 30, 2009.
The following table summarizes total
delinquent loan balances by type of loan as of the dates shown:
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
loan category
|
|
Amount
|
|
loan category
|
|
Amount
|
|
loan
category
|
Loans 30-89 days past due, not on
nonaccrual status
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
450
|
|
0.14%
|
|
$
|
1,151
|
|
0.31%
|
|
$
|
1,781
|
|
0.42%
|
Commercial real estate construction
|
|
|
-
|
|
0.00%
|
|
|
606
|
|
2.05%
|
|
|
-
|
|
0.00%
|
Residential real estate
construction
|
|
|
1,094
|
|
2.10%
|
|
|
-
|
|
0.00%
|
|
|
5,895
|
|
2.93%
|
Total real estate construction
|
|
|
1,094
|
|
1.48%
|
|
|
606
|
|
0.61%
|
|
|
5,895
|
|
2.93%
|
Real estate
mortgage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
406
|
|
0.55%
|
|
|
1,891
|
|
2.52%
|
|
|
6,052
|
|
7.21%
|
Nonstandard mortgage product
|
|
|
-
|
|
0.00%
|
|
|
-
|
|
0.00%
|
|
|
997
|
|
4.17%
|
Home equity lines of credit
|
|
|
247
|
|
0.09%
|
|
|
758
|
|
0.27%
|
|
|
86
|
|
0.03%
|
Total real estate
mortgage
|
|
|
653
|
|
0.18%
|
|
|
2,649
|
|
0.71%
|
|
|
7,135
|
|
1.84%
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
337
|
|
0.04%
|
|
|
3,962
|
|
0.46%
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
0.13%
|
Installment and
consumer
|
|
|
208
|
|
1.27%
|
|
|
59
|
|
0.32%
|
|
|
101
|
|
0.50%
|
Total loans 30-89 days past due, not in
nonaccrual status
|
|
$
|
2,742
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,427
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,082
|
|
|
|
Delinquent loans past due 30-89 days to
total loans
|
|
|
0.17%
|
|
|
|
|
0.49%
|
|
|
|
|
0.84%
|
|
|
Allowance for Credit Losses and Net Loan
Charge-offs
Allowance for Credit Losses.
An allowance for credit losses has been
established based on management’s best estimate, as of the balance sheet date,
of probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. For more information
regarding the Company’s allowance for credit losses and net loan charge-offs,
see the discussion under the subheadings “Credit Management”, “Allowance for
Credit Losses and Net Loan Charge-offs” and “Critical Accounting Policies”
included in Item 7 of the Company’s 2009 10-K.
- 45 -
The following table is a summary of activity in the allowance for credit
losses for the periods presented:
|
|
June 30,
|
|
Mar. 31,
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
Sep. 30
|
|
June 30,
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
Loans outstanding at end of
period
|
|
$
|
1,602,032
|
|
|
$
|
1,666,933
|
|
|
$
|
1,724,842
|
|
|
$
|
1,822,001
|
|
|
$
|
1,917,028
|
|
Average
loans outstanding during the period
|
|
|
1,645,189
|
|
|
|
1,702,763
|
|
|
|
1,791,572
|
|
|
|
1,865,051
|
|
|
|
1,971,467
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses, beginning
of period
|
|
|
41,299
|
|
|
|
39,418
|
|
|
|
40,036
|
|
|
|
38,569
|
|
|
|
38,463
|
|
Total
provision for credit losses
|
|
|
7,758
|
|
|
|
7,634
|
|
|
|
35,233
|
|
|
|
20,300
|
|
|
|
11,393
|
|
Loan charge-offs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
(2,003
|
)
|
|
|
(1,245
|
)
|
|
|
(13,542
|
)
|
|
|
(5,869
|
)
|
|
|
(1,725
|
)
|
Commercial real estate construction
|
|
|
(248
|
)
|
|
|
(487
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(325
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Residential real estate construction
|
|
|
(513
|
)
|
|
|
(875
|
)
|
|
|
(10,628
|
)
|
|
|
(8,563
|
)
|
|
|
(7,283
|
)
|
Total real estate construction
|
|
|
(761
|
)
|
|
|
(1,362
|
)
|
|
|
(10,628
|
)
|
|
|
(8,888
|
)
|
|
|
(7,283
|
)
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
(515
|
)
|
|
|
(932
|
)
|
|
|
(4,742
|
)
|
|
|
(3,018
|
)
|
|
|
(1,244
|
)
|
Nonstandard mortgage
|
|
|
(643
|
)
|
|
|
(1,497
|
)
|
|
|
(692
|
)
|
|
|
(726
|
)
|
|
|
(320
|
)
|
Home equity
|
|
|
(631
|
)
|
|
|
(931
|
)
|
|
|
(1,380
|
)
|
|
|
(204
|
)
|
|
|
(529
|
)
|
Total real estate mortgage
|
|
|
(1,789
|
)
|
|
|
(3,360
|
)
|
|
|
(6,814
|
)
|
|
|
(3,948
|
)
|
|
|
(2,093
|
)
|
Commercial real
estate
|
|
|
(288
|
)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
(4,737
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
Installment and consumer
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
(267
|
)
|
Overdraft
|
|
|
(216
|
)
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
(289
|
)
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
Total loan charge-offs
|
|
|
(5,236
|
)
|
|
|
(6,426
|
)
|
|
|
(36,304
|
)
|
|
|
(19,205
|
)
|
|
|
(11,770
|
)
|
Recoveries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
Commercial real estate construction
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Residential real estate construction
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Total real estate
construction
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Nonstandard mortgage
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total real estate
mortgage
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Installment and
consumer
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Overdraft
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Total recoveries
|
|
|
526
|
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
Net loan charge-offs
|
|
|
(4,710
|
)
|
|
|
(5,753
|
)
|
|
|
(35,851
|
)
|
|
|
(18,833
|
)
|
|
|
(11,287
|
)
|
Allowance for credit losses, end of period
|
|
$
|
44,347
|
|
|
$
|
41,299
|
|
|
$
|
39,418
|
|
|
$
|
40,036
|
|
|
$
|
38,569
|
|
|
Components of allowance for credit
losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
43,329
|
|
|
$
|
40,446
|
|
|
$
|
38,490
|
|
|
$
|
39,075
|
|
|
$
|
37,700
|
|
Reserve for unfunded
commitments
|
|
|
1,018
|
|
|
|
853
|
|
|
|
928
|
|
|
|
961
|
|
|
|
869
|
|
Total allowance for credit
losses
|
|
$
|
44,347
|
|
|
$
|
41,299
|
|
|
$
|
39,418
|
|
|
$
|
40,036
|
|
|
$
|
38,569
|
|
|
Net loan charge-offs to average loans
annualized
|
|
|
1.15%
|
|
|
|
1.37%
|
|
|
|
7.94%
|
|
|
|
4.01%
|
|
|
|
2.30%
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to total
loans
|
|
|
2.70%
|
|
|
|
2.43%
|
|
|
|
2.23%
|
|
|
|
2.14%
|
|
|
|
1.97%
|
|
Allowance for credit losses to total loans
|
|
|
2.77%
|
|
|
|
2.48%
|
|
|
|
2.29%
|
|
|
|
2.20%
|
|
|
|
2.01%
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to
nonperforming loans
|
|
|
55%
|
|
|
|
47%
|
|
|
|
39%
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
Allowance for credit losses to nonperforming loans
|
|
|
56%
|
|
|
|
48%
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
- 46 -
At June 30, 2010, the Company’s
allowance for credit losses was $44.3 million, consisting of a $36.6 million
formula allowance, no specific allowance, a $6.7 million unallocated allowance
and a $1.0 million reserve for unfunded commitments. At December 31, 2009, our
allowance for credit losses was $39.4 million, consisting of a $33.4 million
formula allowance, no specific allowance, a $5.0 million unallocated allowance
and a $1.0 million reserve for unfunded commitments. At June 30, 2010, the
allowance for credit losses was 2.77% of total loans, an increase from 2.29% at
December 31, 2009.
Overall, we believe that the
allowance for credit losses is adequate to absorb losses in the loan portfolio
at June 30, 2010, although there can be no assurance that future loan losses
will not exceed our current estimates. The process for determining the adequacy
of the allowance for credit losses is critical to our financial results. Please
see Item 1A “Risk Factors” in our 2009 10-K.
Net Loan Charge-offs.
For the quarter
ended June 30, 2010, total net loan charge-offs were $4.7 million compared to
$11.3 million in the same quarter ended in 2009. Second quarter 2010 year to
date annualized net loan charge-offs to total average loans outstanding was
1.15%, or half of the 2.3% in the quarter ended June 30, 2009.
Deposits and Borrowings
The following table summarizes the
quarterly average dollar amount in, and the average interest rate paid on, each
of the deposit and borrowing categories for the second quarters of 2010 and 2009
and first quarter 2010:
|
Second Quarter 2010
|
|
First Quarter 2010
|
|
Second Quarter 2009
|
|
Quarterly Average
|
|
Percent
|
|
Rate
|
|
Quarterly Average
|
|
Percent
|
|
Rate
|
|
Quarterly Average
|
|
Percent
|
|
Rate
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
Balance
|
|
of
total
|
|
Paid
|
|
Balance
|
|
of
total
|
|
Paid
|
|
Balance
|
|
of
total
|
|
Paid
|
Non-interest bearing
demand
|
$
|
523,298
|
|
25.5
|
%
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
519,492
|
|
24.9
|
%
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
478,289
|
|
23.0
|
%
|
|
-
|
|
Interest bearing
demand
|
|
332,850
|
|
16.2
|
%
|
|
0.14
|
%
|
|
|
321,070
|
|
15.4
|
%
|
|
0.20
|
%
|
|
|
298,012
|
|
14.4
|
%
|
|
0.26
|
%
|
Savings
|
|
104,052
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
0.25
|
%
|
|
|
98,075
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
0.49
|
%
|
|
|
87,624
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
0.89
|
%
|
Money market
|
|
657,454
|
|
32.1
|
%
|
|
0.60
|
%
|
|
|
642,594
|
|
30.7
|
%
|
|
0.85
|
%
|
|
|
599,417
|
|
28.8
|
%
|
|
1.38
|
%
|
Time deposits
|
|
431,669
|
|
21.1
|
%
|
|
1.95
|
%
|
|
|
507,705
|
|
24.3
|
%
|
|
2.14
|
%
|
|
|
614,472
|
|
29.6
|
%
|
|
2.55
|
%
|
Total deposits
|
|
2,049,323
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
0.64
|
%
|
|
|
2,088,937
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
0.83
|
%
|
|
|
2,077,814
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
1.23
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings
(1)
|
|
17,407
|
|
|
|
|
8.04
|
%
|
|
|
13,100
|
|
|
|
|
4.49
|
%
|
|
|
28,791
|
|
|
|
|
2.41
|
%
|
Long-term borrowings
(1) (2)
|
|
295,803
|
|
|
|
|
5.81
|
%
|
|
|
301,199
|
|
|
|
|
3.01
|
%
|
|
|
269,160
|
|
|
|
|
3.16
|
%
|
Total
borrowings
|
|
313,210
|
|
|
|
|
5.93
|
%
|
|
|
314,299
|
|
|
|
|
2.93
|
%
|
|
|
297,951
|
|
|
|
|
3.09
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits and
borrowings
|
$
|
2,362,533
|
|
|
|
|
1.72
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,403,236
|
|
|
|
|
1.41
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,375,765
|
|
|
|
|
1.83
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
Includes $2.3
million prepayment fee in connection with prepaying $99.1 million in FHLB
borrowings in the second quarter 2010.
(2)
Long-term borrowings
include junior subordinated debentures.
Second quarter 2010 average total
deposits of $2.05 billion declined 1% or $28.5 million from the same quarter in
2009. With excess balance sheet liquidity, we elected to reduce higher cost time
deposit balances, which declined $183 million or 30% from average time deposit
balances in the second quarter last year. Time deposits represented just 21% of
the Company’s average total deposits in the most recent quarter. The combination
of the Company’s favorable deposit mix and recent deposit pricing strategies
helped reduce the average rate paid on total deposits to .64% in second quarter
2010, representing a decline of 59 basis points from 1.23% in same quarter 2009.
Whether we will continue to be successful maintaining or growing our low cost
deposit base will depend on various factors, including deposit pricing
strategies, the effects of competition, client behavior, and regulatory
limitations. In addition, the continued availability of the Transaction Account
Guarantee Program (the “TAG Program”) providing expanded deposit insurance may
affect our ability to retain deposit balances.
At June 30, 2010, brokered deposits
totaled $59.1 million or 3% of period end deposits, of which $11.6 million were
deposits obtained through the Bank's participation in the Certificate of Deposit
Account Registry Service ("CDARS") network and $47.5 million were wholesale
brokered deposits, compared to $72.4 million in brokered deposits at December
31, 2009 and $100.2 million at June 30, 2009.
The average balance of FHLB
borrowings increased by $15.3 million to $313.2 million in the quarter ended
June 30, 2010, from the same period last year. However, on June 30, 2010, the
Company made a prepayment of $99.1 million in FHLB borrowings with an associated
fee of $2.3 million.
At June 30, 2010, the balance of
junior subordinated debentures issued in connection with our prior issuances of
trust preferred securities was $51.0 million, unchanged from December 31, 2009.
At June 30, 2010, the Company had a balance in other liabilities of $1.2 million
in accrued and unpaid interest expense on these junior subordinated debentures,
and it may not pay dividends on its capital stock until all such accrued but
unpaid interest has been paid in full. Under the Written Agreement with the DFCS
and FRB, we cannot resume interest payments on our trust preferred securities
without prior regulatory approval. For additional detail regarding Bancorp’s
outstanding debentures, see Note 10 in the financial statements included under
Item 1 of this report.
- 47 -
Capital Resources
The Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve”) and the FDIC have established minimum
requirements for capital adequacy for bank holding companies and state
non-member banks. For more information on these topics, see the discussions
under the subheadings “Capital Adequacy Requirements” in the section
“Supervision and Regulation” included in Item 1 of the Company’s 2009 10-K. The
following table summarizes the capital measures of Bancorp and the Bank at June
30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank-level
|
|
West Coast Bancorp
|
|
|
West Coast Bank
|
|
Guideline requirements
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Adequately
|
|
Well
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
Capitalized
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital
ratio
|
|
16.50
|
%
|
|
|
9.85
|
%
|
|
|
7.17
|
%
|
|
|
|
15.84
|
%
|
|
|
9.56
|
%
|
|
|
14.11
|
%
|
|
4.00%
|
|
6.00%
|
Total risk-based capital
ratio
|
|
17.76
|
%
|
|
|
11.10
|
%
|
|
|
9.13
|
%
|
|
|
|
17.10
|
%
|
|
|
10.81
|
%
|
|
|
15.37
|
%
|
|
8.00%
|
|
10.00%
|
Leverage ratio
|
|
11.90
|
%
|
|
|
8.65
|
%
|
|
|
5.37
|
%
|
|
|
|
11.43
|
%
|
|
|
8.39
|
%
|
|
|
10.57
|
%
|
|
4.00%
|
|
5.00%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders'
equity
|
$
|
267,412
|
|
|
$
|
168,666
|
|
|
$
|
249,058
|
|
|
|
$
|
305,656
|
|
|
$
|
212,852
|
|
|
$
|
288,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bancorp’s total capital ratio
improved to 17.76% at June 30, 2010, up from 9.13% at December 31, 2009 and
11.10% at June 30, 2009, while Bancorp's Tier 1 capital ratio increased to
16.50% at current quarter end, from 7.17% at year end 2009 and 9.85% at June 30,
2009. Bancorp’s capital ratios improved dramatically over year end 2009
principally as a result of the mandatory conversion of Series A preferred stock
issued in the Company's October 2009 private capital raise into 71.4 million
common shares following receipt of shareholder approvals relating to the
transactions. The $9.4 million in net proceeds from the successful rights
offering completed during first quarter 2010 and $7.0 million in net proceeds
from the recent discretionary equity issuance, along with a reduction in risk
weighted assets over the past 12 months, also contributed to improved capital
ratios at Bancorp.
The total capital ratio at the Bank
improved to 17.10% at June 30, 2010, from 10.81% at June 30, 2009, while the
Bank’s Tier 1 capital ratio increased to 15.84% from 9.56% over the same period.
The leverage ratio at the Bank improved to 11.43% at June 30, 2010, from 8.39%
at June 30, 2009. Improved capital ratios at the Bank were also attributable to
the private capital raise in 2009, the rights offering and discretionary equity
issuance program in 2010, as well as a decline in the balance of risk weighted
assets over the past year. For more information regarding Bancorp’s
discretionary equity issuance program, see the discussion under the subheading
“Discretionary Equity issuance Program” in the Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section included in
Item 2 of this report.
The total risk based capital ratios
of Bancorp include $51 million of junior subordinated debentures which qualified
as Tier 1 capital at June 30, 2010, under guidance issued by the Federal
Reserve. As provided in the Dodd – Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act, which was signed into law on July 21, 2010, Bancorp expects to
continue to rely on these junior subordinated debentures as part of its
regulatory capital. However, it does not expect to issue additional junior
subordinated debentures as any future issued junior subordinated debentures
would not qualify as Tier 1 total capital under the same Act.
Bancorp’s stockholders’ equity was
$267 million at June 30, 2010, up from $249 million at year end 2009 and $169
million at June 30, 2009.
Bancorp may take steps to raise
additional capital in the future. To do so, Bancorp may offer and issue
qualifying equity or debt instruments. Any equity or debt financing, if
available at all, may be dilutive to existing shareholders or include covenants
or other restrictions that limit the Company’s activities.
- 48 -
Liquidity and Sources of Funds
The Bank’s sources of funds include
customer deposits, advances from the FHLB, maturities of investment securities,
sales of “Available for Sale” securities, loan and OREO sales, loan repayments,
net income, if any, loans taken out at the Federal Reserve discount window, and
the use of Federal Funds markets. Scheduled loan repayments are a relatively
stable source of funds, while deposit inflows, unscheduled loan prepayments, and
loan and OREO sales are not. Deposit inflows, loan and OREO sales, and
unscheduled loan prepayments are influenced by general interest rate levels,
interest rates available on other investments, competition, market and general
economic conditions and other factors.
Deposits are our primary source of
funds. Over the past 12 months our loan to deposit ratio declined from 91% at
June 30, 2009 to 80% at June 30, 2010. This was mainly as a result of loans
declining $315 million. Significantly lower loan balances combined with a
significantly bolstered equity position caused the collective balance of
interest bearing deposits in other bank and investment securities portfolio to
grow $300 million to $769 million at June 30, 2010 and 32% of total earning
assets. In light of the substantial liquidity position, a portion of which
carried a higher cost of funds than amounts being earned and therefore has an
adverse impact on net interest income and operating results, we reduced
wholesale, internet, and other term deposits as well as FHLB borrowings during
the most recent quarter.
At June 30, 2010, the Bank had
outstanding borrowings of $164 million, against its $423 million in established
borrowing capacity with the FHLB, as compared to $263 million against its $478
million in established borrowing capacity at December 31, 2009. The Bank’s
borrowing facility is subject to collateral and stock ownership requirements.
The Bank also had a Federal Funds line of credit agreement with a correspondent
financial institution of $5 million at June 30, 2010, of which none was
outstanding at June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009. The use of such Federal
Funds lines is subject to certain conditions. The Bank had an available discount
window credit line with the FRB of approximately $47 million at June 30, 2010,
with no balance outstanding at either June 30, 2010, or December 31, 2009. As
with the other lines, the FRB line is subject to collateral requirements, must
be repaid within 90 days, and each advance is subject to prior FRB consent.
Under Bancorp’s Written Agreement
with the DFCS and the FRB, it may not access dividends from the Bank without the
consent of these agencies.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At June 30, 2010, the Bank had
commitments to extend credit of $572 million, which was up 1% compared to $564
million at December 31, 2009. For additional information regarding off balance
sheet arrangements and future financial commitments, see Note 8 “Commitments And
Contingent Liabilities” in the financial statements included under Item 1 of
this report.
- 49 -
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk
There has been no material change in
the market risks disclosure under Item 7A “Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures about Market Risk” in the Company’s 2009 10-K.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls
and Procedures
Our disclosure controls and
procedures are designed to ensure that information the Company must disclose in
its reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported
within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and accumulated
and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer
(“CEO”) and chief financial officer (“CFO”), as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management has evaluated, with the
participation and under the supervision of our CEO and CFO, the effectiveness of
our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this
report. Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of
such date, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in
ensuring that information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, required to be disclosed in reports that it files under the
Exchange Act is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (2) accumulated an
communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal
controls over financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
controls over financial reporting.
- 50 -
PART II: OTHER
INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On June 24, 2009, the Company's
subsidiary, West Coast Trust, was served with an Objection to Personal
Representative's Petition and Petition for Surcharge of Personal Representative
in Linn County Circuit Court. The petition was filed by the beneficiaries of the
estate of Archie Q. Adams, for which West Coast Trust acts as the personal
representative. The petitioners allege a breach of fiduciary duty with respect
to West Coast Trust's prior sale of real property owned by the Adams estate and
sought relief in the form of a surcharge to West Coast Trust of $215,573,115.60,
the amount of the alleged loss to the estate. The Company believes the petition
is without merit.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Continuing economic problems or a
sluggish recovery in the markets we serve may adversely affect our ability to
achieve a return to earnings and could increase the credit risk associated with
our loan portfolio.
Substantially all of our loans and
loan opportunities are to businesses and individuals in our markets in Oregon
and Washington. The economy in this region has been severely impacted by the
same challenges facing the economy nationally, and this region has seen
particularly severe increases in unemployment and declines in the residential
and commercial real estate markets. The local economy has shown signs of
improvement similar to those seen nationally, although the Pacific Northwest has
historically been slower to recover from recessionary periods than other parts
of the national economy. There are signs that may be true again. Any further
deterioration in economic conditions or failure to recover in the markets in
which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our business, results
of operations, and prospects for a return to earnings and could result in the
following consequences:
-
sluggish
loan demand and fewer loan opportunities to qualified borrowers;
-
reduced
demand for banking products and services, including deposit
services;
-
continued
reduced or even lower levels of economic activity at our business
customers;
-
elevated
borrower risk profiles that apply upward pressure on provision for credit
losses;
-
increased
loan delinquencies; and
-
further
declines in collateral values.
Recent legislative and required
regulatory initiatives will impose restrictions and requirements on financial
institutions that could have an adverse effect on our
business.
The United States Congress, the
Treasury Department and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation have taken
several steps to support the financial services industry that have included
certain well publicized programs, such as the Troubled Asset Relief Program, as
well as programs enhancing the liquidity available to financial institutions and
increasing insurance available on bank deposits. These programs have provided an
important source of support to many financial institutions. Partly in response
to these programs and the current economic climate, the President signed on July
21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010.
Few provisions of the Act are effective immediately with various provisions
becoming effective in stages. Many of the provisions require governmental
agencies to implement rules over the next 18 months. These rules will increase
regulation of the financial services industry and impose restrictions on the
ability of firms within the industry to conduct business consistent with
historical practices. These rules will, as examples, impact the ability of
financial institutions to charge certain banking and other fees, allow interest
to be paid on demand deposits, impose new restrictions on lending practices and
require depository institution holding companies to maintain capital levels at
levels not less than the levels required for insured depository institutions. We
cannot predict the substance or impact of pending or future legislation or
regulation. Compliance with such legislation or regulation may, among other
effects, significantly increase our costs, limit our product offerings and
operating flexibility, require significant adjustments in our internal business
processes, and possibly require us to maintain our regulatory capital at levels
above historical practices.
The Bank derives overdraft fee
income from its customer’s participation in the Bank’s overdraft service program
for ATM and one-time debit card transactions. If customer’s elect not to opt-in
to participate in the Bank’s program, overdraft fee income may be negatively
affected.
Recent amendments to Regulation E
require the customer to opt-in to participate in the Bank’s overdraft service
program. The mandatory compliance date for the Regulation E amendments was July
1, 2010, provided the Bank may continue to assess overdraft service fees or
charges on existing customer accounts prior to August 15, 2010 without obtaining
the customer’s affirmative consent. Although the majority of our customers have
elected to opt-in, we are not able to predict future customer behavior. If
customers do not elect to participate in our overdraft protection program, an
important source of noninterest income may be negatively affected.
- 51 -
A large percentage of our loan
portfolio is secured by real estate, in particular commercial real estate.
Continued deterioration in the real estate market or other segments of our loan
portfolio would lead to additional losses.
As of June 30, 2010, approximately
79% of our loan portfolio is secured by real estate, the majority of which is
commercial real estate. As a result of increased levels of commercial and
consumer delinquencies and declining real estate values, we have experienced
high levels of net charge-offs and provision for credit losses. Continued
increases in commercial and consumer delinquency levels or continued declines in
real estate market values would require increased net charge-offs and increases
in the allowance for credit losses, which could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition, and results of operations and prospects.
In addition, continued deterioration in the credit quality of loans secured by
real estate could result in loans that we have restructured becoming delinquent
and classified as non-accrual loans.
We continue to hold and acquire a
significant amount of OREO properties, which has led to increased operating
expenses and vulnerability to additional declines in real property values.
We foreclose on and take title to
the real estate serving as collateral for many of our loans as part of our
business. During 2009 and the first six months of 2010, we continued to acquire
a significant amount of OREO. At June 30, 2010, the Bank had 446 OREO properties
with an aggregate book value of $37.6 million. Large OREO balances have led to
significantly increased expenses as we have incurred costs to manage and dispose
of these properties and, in certain cases, complete construction of structures
prior to sale. We expect that our operating results in 2010 will continue to be
negatively affected by expenses associated with OREO, including personnel costs,
insurance and taxes, completion and repair costs, and valuation adjustments, as
well as by the funding costs associated with assets that are tied up in OREO.
Any further decrease in market prices of real estate in our market areas may
lead to additional OREO write downs, with a corresponding expense in our income
statement. We evaluate OREO property values periodically and write down the
carrying value of the properties if the results of our evaluations require
it.
To reduce our level of
non-performing loans, we may elect to sell loans to third parties, which could
result in losses for the Bank.
We may elect to sell loans or
packages of loans to third parties. Such sales may be at prices below the
carrying value of the loans, which would require the immediate recognition of
additional losses and reduce our capital levels.
The value of the securities in our
investment securities portfolio may be negatively affected by continued
disruptions in securities markets.
The market for some of the
investment securities held in our portfolio has been volatile over the past two
years. Our assessment of the impairment of investment securities considers
several uncertain and qualitative factors, including, without limitation, the
length of time and extent to which the fair value of a particular security has
been less than cost, the financial condition and prospects of the issuer over
varying time horizons, expected future cash flows and anticipated timing of such
cash flows, and our intent and ability to retain a particular investment long
enough to recover value in the future. There can be no assurance that the
declines in market value associated with these disruptions in the marketplace
will not result in accounting charges that could have a material adverse effect
on our net income and capital levels. Our corporate securities portfolio had a
$4.8 million net unrealized loss at June 30, 2010. For more information
concerning our investment securities and our investment portfolio, please refer
to Note 3—“Investment Securities” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2010.
For detailed discussion of other
risks that may affect our business, see Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in our 2009
10-K
.
- 52 -
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity
Securities and Use of Proceeds
(c)
|
The
following table provides information about repurchases of common stock by
the Company during the quarter ended June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as Part of
Publicly
|
|
Maximum Number of Shares
Remaining
|
|
|
Total Number of
Shares
|
|
Average Price Paid
|
|
Announced Plans or
Programs
|
|
at Period End that May Be
Purchased
|
Period
|
|
Purchased
(1)
|
|
per
Share
|
|
(2)
|
|
Under the
Plans or Programs
|
4/1/10 - 4/30/10
|
|
10,086
|
|
$
|
2.98
|
|
-
|
|
1,051,821
|
5/1/10 - 5/31/10
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
-
|
|
1,051,821
|
6/1/10 - 6/30/10
|
|
119
|
|
$
|
2.93
|
|
-
|
|
1,051,821
|
Total for
quarter
|
|
10,205
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(1)
|
Shares
repurchased by Bancorp during the quarter include shares acquired from
employees in connection with stock option exercises and cancellation of
restricted stock to pay withholding taxes totaling 10,086 shares, 0
shares, and 119 shares, respectively, for the periods indicated. There
were no shares repurchased in the periods indicated pursuant to the
Company’s corporate stock repurchase program publicly announced in July
2000 (the “Repurchase Program”) and described in note 2
below.
|
(2)
|
Under the
Repurchase Program, the board of directors originally authorized the
Company to repurchase up to 330,000 common shares, which amount was
increased by 550,000 shares in September 2000, by 1.0 million shares in
September 2001, by 1.0 million shares in September 2002, by 1.0 million
shares in April 2004, and by 1.0 million shares in September 2007 for a
total authorized repurchase amount as of June 30, 2010, of approximately
4.9 million shares.
|
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior
Securities
None
Item 4.
[Reserved]
Item 5. Other
Information
None
- 53 -
Item 6. Exhibits
|
Exhibit No
.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of CEO under Rule 13(a) – 14(a) of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of CFO under Rule 13(a) – 14(a) of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification of CEO and CFO under 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
|
- 54 -
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to
the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|
WEST COAST BANCORP
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 6,
2010
|
/s/ Robert
D. Sznewajs
|
|
|
Robert D.
Sznewajs
|
|
President and Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 6,
2010
|
/s/ Anders
Giltvedt
|
|
|
Anders Giltvedt
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
|
- 55 -
West Coast Bancorp (MM) (NASDAQ:WCBO)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Jun 2024 bis Jul 2024
West Coast Bancorp (MM) (NASDAQ:WCBO)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Jul 2023 bis Jul 2024