UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
x
|
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended January 31, 2011
|
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
|
For the transition period from ____________ to ____________
Commission file number
:
333-156594
Amarok Resources, Inc.
(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
|
Nevada
|
98-0599925
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
|
30021 Tomas Street Suite 300
Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688
(Address of principal executive offices)
(949) 682-7889
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
_____________________________________________________________
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
x
Yes
o
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
x
Yes
o
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company; as defined within Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
o
Large accelerated filer
o
Accelerated filer
o
Non-accelerated filer
x
Smaller reporting company
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
o
Yes
x
No
The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common equity as of January 31, 2011:
76,404,240 shares of common stock
Amarok Resources, Inc.
(Formerly Ukragro Corporation)
(An Exploratory Stage Company)
Cont
en
ts
PART I -
FINA
NC
IAL INFORMATION
Item 1 -
Financia
l
Statements
|
Amarok R
es
ources, Inc.
|
|
|
(An Exploratory Stage Company)
|
|
|
Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,676,976
|
|
|
$
|
2,011,633
|
|
|
Prepaid consulting
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,225
|
|
|
Prepaid rent
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
|
Prepaid services
|
|
|
6,450
|
|
|
|
9,675
|
|
|
Security deposit
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,685,843
|
|
|
|
2,025,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,685,843
|
|
|
$
|
2,025,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
7,934
|
|
|
$
|
10,612
|
|
|
Accounts payable - related parties
|
|
|
13,476
|
|
|
|
46,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,410
|
|
|
|
56,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' equity (deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, 175,000,000 shares authorized, $0.001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
par value, 76,404,240 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at January 31, 2011 and 76,404,240 shares issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and outstanding at October 31, 2010
|
|
|
76,404
|
|
|
|
76,404
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital (deficit)
|
|
|
4,027,390
|
|
|
|
4,027,390
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(161,790
|
)
|
|
|
(161,790
|
)
|
|
Deficit accumulated during the exploratory stage
|
|
|
(2,277,571
|
)
|
|
|
(1,972,956
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
1,664,433
|
|
|
|
1,969,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)
|
|
$
|
1,685,843
|
|
|
$
|
2,025,950
|
|
(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed financial statements)
|
Amarok Res
ou
rces, Inc.
|
|
|
(An Exploratory Stage Company)
|
|
|
Statements of Operations
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
January 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
(Exploratory
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Stage)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploratory costs
|
|
$
|
243,683
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,046,989
|
|
|
Contributed services
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
Management fees
|
|
|
24,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
104,000
|
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
27,930
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
77,527
|
|
|
Rent
|
|
|
3,652
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13,586
|
|
|
Other general and administrative
|
|
|
5,493
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
36,451
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
304,758
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
2,278,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (expenses) and income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(304,615
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,500
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,277,571
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares outstanding
|
|
|
76,404,240
|
|
|
|
150,120,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed financial statements)
|
Amarok Re
so
urces, Inc.
|
|
|
(An Exploratory Stage Company)
|
|
|
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
January 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
(Exploratory
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Stage)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(304,615
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,500
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,277,571
|
)
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributed services and rent
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
493,198
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in prepaid rent
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,217
|
)
|
|
Decrease in prepaid consulting
|
|
|
2,225
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,225
|
|
|
Decrease in prepaid services
|
|
|
3,225
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(6,450
|
)
|
|
Increase in security deposit
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,200
|
)
|
|
Decrease in accounts payable
|
|
|
(2,678
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,670
|
|
|
Decrease in accounts payable - related parties
|
|
|
(32,814
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13,071
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(334,657
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,773,024
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in mining property
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net of offering costs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,450,000
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,450,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
(334,657
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,676,976
|
|
|
Cash - beginning of period
|
|
|
2,011,633
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash - end of period
|
|
$
|
1,676,976
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,676,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In June 2010, the Company issued 10,000 shares of its common stock in consideration for geology services
|
|
|
provided, valued at $8,900. At January 31, 2011, all of the $8,900 original balance had been amortized and charged
|
|
|
to operations as exploration costs.
|
|
(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed financial statements)
Am
arok Resources, Inc.
(An Exploratory stage company)
Notes to The Financial Statements
NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
We prepared the accompanying financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and included the accounts of Amarok Resources, Inc.
Amarok Resources, Inc. (the “Company,” “we” or “our”) interim financial statements are unaudited. They contain all necessary adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) for a fair statement of the referenced interim period results. These interim period results do not indicate expected full-year results or results for future quarter/periods, due to several factors, including volatility of interest rates, geological risks, transportation restrictions, timing of acquisitions, product demand, market competition, and our ability to obtain additional capital. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and related notes included in Amarok Resources, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2010.
Amarok Resources, Inc. (“Amarok” or the “Company”) was incorporated in the state of Nevada on October 23, 2008 under the name Ukragro Corporation. The Company’s principal activity is the exploration and development of mineral properties for future commercial development and production.
On January 29, 2010, the Company filed an amendment to its articles of incorporation changing its name to Amarok Resources, Inc. In the same amendment, the Company changed its authorized capital to 175,000,000 shares of common stock at a restated par value of $0.001. Effective February 23, 2010, the Company authorized a 60:1 stock split. The accompanying financial statements have been restated to reflect the change in capital and stock split as if they occurred at the Company’s inception.
Effective February 1, 2010, the Company entered the exploratory stage as defined under the provisions of Accounting Codification Standard (“ASC”) 915-10.
Going Concern
The Company has incurred net losses since inception, and as of January 31, 2011, had a combined accumulated deficit of $2,439,361. These conditions raise substantial doubt as to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. These financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts, or amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
Management recognizes that the Company must generate additional resources to enable it to continue operations. Management intends to raise additional financing through debt financing and equity financing or through other means that it deems necessary, with a view to moving forward and sustaining a prolonged growth in its strategy phases. However, no assurance can be given that the Company will be successful in raising additional capital. Further, even if the company raises additional capital, there can be no assurance that the Company will achieve profitability or positive cash flow. If management is unable to raise additional capital and expected significant revenues do not result in positive cash flow, the Company will not be able to meet its obligations and may have to cease operations
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The Company follows accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and the results of operations for the periods presented have been reflected herein.
Amarok Resources, Inc.
(An Exploratory stage company)
Notes to The Financial Statements
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments and other short-term investments with a maturity date of three months or less, when purchased, to be cash equivalents.
Mining Costs
Costs incurred to purchase, lease or otherwise acquire property are capitalized when incurred. General exploration costs and costs to maintain rights and leases are expensed as incurred. Management periodically reviews the recoverability of the capitalized mineral properties. Management takes into consideration various information including, but not limited to, historical production records taken from previous mining operations, results of exploration activities conducted to date, estimated future prices and reports and opinions of outside consultants. When it is determined that a project or property will be abandoned or its carrying value has been impaired, a provision is made for any expected loss on the project or property.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Pursuant to ASC No. 820,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
, the Company is required to estimate the fair value of all financial instruments included on its balance sheet as of January 31, 2011. The Company’s financial instruments consist of payables and due to related party. The Company considers the carrying value of such amounts in the financial statements to approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments.
Loss Per Share of Common Stock
The Company follows ASC No. 260,
Earnings Per Share
(ASC No. 260) that requires the reporting of both basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share. Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. The calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. In accordance with ASC No. 260, any anti-dilutive effects on net earnings (loss) per share are excluded. Potential common shares at January 31, 2011 that have been excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share included warrants exercisable into 6,000,000 shares of common stock. There were no potential common shares at January 31, 2010.
Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company maintains its cash in domestic financial institutions subject to insurance coverage issued by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Under FDIC rules, the Company is entitled to aggregate coverage as defined by Federal regulation per account type per separate legal entity per financial institution. During the three months ended January 31, 2011 and 2010, and subsequent thereto, respectively, the Company, from time-to-time, may have had deposits in a financial institution with credit risk exposures in excess of statutory FDIC coverage. The Company has incurred no losses as a result of any unsecured situations.
Amarok Resources, Inc.
(An Exploratory stage company)
Notes to The Financial Statements
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2010, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-29 (ASU 2010-29),
Business Combinations (Topic 805) – Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations
. This Accounting Standards Update requires a public entity to disclose pro forma information for business combinations that occurred in the current reporting period. The disclosures include pro forma revenue and earnings of the combined entity for the current reporting period as though the acquisition date for all business combinations that occurred during the year had been as of the beginning of the annual reporting period. If comparative financial statements are presented, the pro forma revenue and earnings of the combined entity for the comparable prior reporting period should be reported as though the acquisition date for all business combinations that occurred during the current year had been as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period. The amendments in this Update affect any public entity as defined by Topic 805 that enters into business combinations that are material on an individual or aggregate basis. The amendments in this Update are effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-29 to have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In August 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-22 (ASU 2010-22),
Accounting for Various Topics -- Technical Corrections to SEC Paragraphs - An announcement made by the staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
. This Accounting Standards Update amends various SEC paragraphs based on external comments received and the issuance of SAB 112, which amends or rescinds portions of certain SAB topics. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-22 to have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In August 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-21 (ASU 2010-21), Accounting for Technical Amendments to Various SEC Rules and Schedules: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Release No. 33-9026: Technical Amendments to Rules, Forms, Schedules and Codification of Financial Reporting Policies. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-21 to have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In
July 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-20 (ASU 2010-20),
Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.
The amendments in this Update are to provide financial statement users with greater transparency about an entity’s allowance for credit losses and the credit quality of its financing receivables. The disclosures about activity that occurs during the reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-20 to have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In April 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-17 (ASU 2010-17),
Revenue Recognition – Milestone Method (Topic 605)
. ASU 2010-17 provides guidance on applying the milestone method of revenue recognition in arrangements with research and development activities. The amendments in this Update are effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company’s adoption of the provisions of ASU 2010-17 did not have a material impact on its revenue recognition.
Amarok Resources, Inc.
(An Exploratory stage company)
Notes to The Financial Statements
NOTE 3 – MINING CLAIMS
Rodeo Creek Project, Nevada
On February 22, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with Carlin Gold Resources, Inc, (“Carlin”) in which Carlin assigned the Company all of its rights, title, and interest in an exploration agreement between it and Trio Gold Corp (“Trio”). The assigned exploration agreement was dated January 28, 2010. In consideration for the assignment of the interest in the exploration agreement, the Company paid Carlin $1 and issued 100,000 shares of its common stock, valued at $168,000 based upon the trading price of the shares on the date of issuance. The value of these shares has been charged to operations and included in exploration costs.
Trio has leased and has an option to purchase a 100% interest in 29 unpatented lode mining claims located in Nevada within the Carlin Gold Trend (the “Claims”). The Claims are subject to a 1.5% Net Smelter Return.
Under the Agreement, the Company earns a 75% undivided interest in the Property during an earn-in period commencing in January 2010 and completing in December 2012 (the “earn-in period”). Upon completion of the earn-in period, a Joint Venture is to be formed with the same 75% / 25% interest the parties held during the earn-in period. The Joint Venture shall remain in effect for twenty-five years or as long as the claims are being actively mined or developed, whichever is longer. After the termination of the Joint Venture, the Claims shall revert back to Trio.
During the earn-in-period, the Company is to provide $5,500,000 in funding to cover operational costs according to the following schedule: $1,500,000 during the 2010 budget year, $2,000,000 during the 2011 budget year and $2,000,000 during the 2012 budget year. Each budget year shall commence on January 1 of that year and end on December 31 of that same year. Once the Company has provided $5,500,000 in funding for the project, the Company and Trio shall fund the operational costs jointly, with the Company providing 75% of the funds and Trio providing 25% of the funds.
The Company is required to pay a minimum annual royalty during the earn-in period to Trio according to the following schedule: $75,000 cash payment upon signing of the agreement, $100,000 cash payment on April 1, 2011 and $150,000 cash payment on April 1, 2012. The Company paid $75,000 to Trio on February 8, 2010, which was charged to operations and included in exploration costs.
In addition, within three months of the assignment, the Company is required to issue Trio shares of its common stock equaling 0.20% of its total issued and outstanding as of February 22, 2010. Upon expenditure of a minimum of $2,000,000 on the claims, Trio shall receive an additional 0.10% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common shares. Upon expending a minimum of $4,000,000 million on the claims, Trio shall receive an additional 0.10% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common shares. Upon expenditure of $5,500,000 million on the claims, Trio shall receive a final 0.10% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common shares. All shares issued shall be restricted common shares and will be stamped with the applicable hold period. The Company issued 144,240 shares of its common stock to Trio, representing 0.20% of the shares then outstanding valued at $242,323, based upon the trading price of the shares on date of issuance. The value of these shares has been charged to operations and included in exploration costs. The Company has paid a total of $1,375,000 to Trio Gold as of January 31, 2011.
Trio is a company incorporated in the Province of Alberta Canada. Trio’s current President is the father of the Company’s sole officer and director.
The sole officer, director, and shareholder of Carlin is a business associate of the Company’s sole officer and director.
Amarok Resources, Inc.
(An Exploratory stage company)
Notes to The Financial Statements
Cuevas Blanca Gold Property
On April 16, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with St. Elias Mines Ltd. (“St. Elias”) in which Amarok is given an option to earn a 60% interest, subject to a 1.5% net smelter return (“NSR”) royalty, in the Cueva Blanca gold property (1,200 hectares) in Northern Peru, which is wholly owned by St. Elias
.
Under the terms of the letter agreement, it is possible for the Company to acquire a 60% interest in the Property
(subject to a 1.5% NSR) in consideration of: (a) making cash payments of $200,000 to St. Elias over a two-year period; (b) issuing 100,000 common shares in the capital of Amarok to St. Elias; and (c) incurring at least $1,500,000 in exploration expenditures on the Property over a three-year period.
In addition, the Company shall have the right to purchase one-half of the 1.5% NSR from St. Elias for the sum of $1,500,000, thereby reducing the NSR payable to from 1.5% to 0.75%.
The Company’s first payment of $10,000 was paid on June 24, 2010. As of January 31, 2011, the Company has paid $27,603 in fees towards property maintenance costs on the Cueva Blanca property. These payments are applied towards the $200,000 due to St. Elias.
NOTE 4 – FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING
Fair Value Measurements
The Company follows the provisions of ASC No. 820-10 (ASC 820-10),
Fair Value Measurements
. ASC 820-10 relates to financial assets and financial liabilities. ASC 820-10 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of this standard apply to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and are to be applied prospectively with limited exceptions.
ASC 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. This standard is now the single source in GAAP for the definition of fair value, except for the fair value of leased property as defined in SFAS 13. ASC 820-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions, about market participant assumptions, that are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC 820-10 are described below:
|
|
●
|
Level 1
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Level 2
|
Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates); and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Level 3
|
Inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable. These inputs rely on management's own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. (The unobservable inputs are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances and may include the Company's own data.)
|
Amarok Resources, Inc.
(An Exploratory stage company)
Notes to The Financial Statements
The following table presents the Company's fair value hierarchy for those assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of January 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
January 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Level
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
2
|
|
$
|
7,934
|
|
|
$
|
7,934
|
|
|
Due to related parties
|
2
|
|
$
|
13,476
|
|
|
$
|
13,476
|
|
Recorded values of accounts payable and due to related parties approximate fair values due to the short maturities of such instruments.
NOTE 5 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
As discussed in Note 3, on February 22, 2010 the Company entered into an agreement with Carlin Gold Resources, Inc., (“Carlin”) in which Carlin assigned the Company all of its rights, title, and interest in an exploration agreement between it and Trio Gold Corp (“Trio”). Trio is a company incorporated in the Province of Alberta Canada. Trio’s current President is the father of the Company’s sole officer and director. Further, the sole officer, director, and shareholder of Carlin is a business associate of the Company’s sole officer and director.
In January 2010, an agreement went into effect whereby the Company is paying a company affiliated with the Company’s sole officer and director for consulting services of $8,000 a month on a month-to-month basis. A total of $24,000 was charged to operations for the three months ended January 31, 2011. Accounts payable to this related party totaled $8,000 at January 31, 2011
At January 31, 2011 the remaining accounts payable to related party was made up of $405 in expenses reimbursements due to the Company’s president $1,371 in expense reimbursements due to Harry Ruskowsky, President of Trio Gold and the father of the company’s president, $1,700 due to Earl Abbott an outside geologist and shareholder of the Company, and $2,000 due to Kelsey Hammond an outside geologist and shareholder of the Company.
NOTE 6 – STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Three Months Ended January 31, 2011
On January 3, 2011, the Company extended its consulting agreement with an outside consultant to perform work for the Company for a twelve month period ending December 31, 2011. Compensation provided to the consultant will be $4,000 a month. The consultant will also receive, as an additional bonus, 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued after March 1, 2011. Amortization of the Consultant’s original signing bonus as of January 31, 2011 totaled $2,225, and has been charged to operations and included in exploration costs. At January 31, 2011, the original signing bonus valued at $8,900 had been completely amortized.
Amarok Resources, Inc.
(An Exploratory stage company)
Notes to The Financial Statements
Warrants
The following is a schedule of warrants outstanding as of January 31, 2011:
|
|
|
Warrants Outstanding
|
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
|
|
Weighted Average Remaining Life
|
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, October 31, 2008
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants granted
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
Warrants exercised
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
Warrants expired
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, October 31, 2009
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants granted
|
|
|
6,000,000
|
|
|
|
0.83
|
|
|
2 Years
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
Warrants exercised
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
Warrants expired
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, October 31, 2010
|
|
|
6,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
2 Years
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 31, 2011
|
|
|
6,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
1.31 Years
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
NOTE 7 – INCOME TAXES
The Company accounts for income taxes under ASC No. 740 (ASC 740),
Accounting for Income Taxes.
This statement mandates the liability method of accounting for deferred income taxes and permits the recognition of deferred tax assets subject to an ongoing assessment of realizability.
As of January 31, 2011, the Company had estimated federal net operating loss carry forwards totaling approximately $2,300,000 which can be used to offset future federal income tax. The federal net operating loss carry forwards expire at various dates through 2030. The utilization of the net operating losses to offset future net taxable income is subject to the limitations imposed by the change in control under Internal Revenue Code Section 382. Deferred tax assets resulting from the net operating losses are reduced by a valuation allowance, when, in the opinion of management, utilization is not reasonably assured. At January 31, 2011, the Company’s gross deferred tax asset totaled $782,000. This amount was reduced 100% by a valuation allowance, making the net deferred tax asset $0.
NOTE 8 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
As previously discussed in Note 6, a consultant will receive 10,000 shares as a signing bonus after March 1, 2011.
Amarok Resources, Inc.
Item 2 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Fin
an
cial Condition and Results of Operations
This statement may include projections of future results and “forward looking statements” as that term is defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All statements that are included in this Quarterly Report, other than statements of historical fact, are forward looking statements. Although management believes that the expectations reflected in these forward looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct.
The following discussion and analysis provides information which management of Amarok Resources, Inc. (the "Company") believes to be relevant to an assessment and understanding of the Company's results of operations and financial condition. This discussion should be read together with the Company's financial statements and the notes to financial statements, which are included in this report.
Because of the nature of a company with limited operational history the reported results will not necessarily reflect the future.
Business Summary
Amarok Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the state of Nevada on October 23, 2008 under the name Ukragro Corporation. The Company’s principal activity is the exploration and development of mineral properties for future commercial development and/or production.
On January 29, 2010, the Company filed an amendment to its articles of incorporation changing its name to Amarok Resources, Inc. In the same amendment, the Company changed its authorized capital to 175,000,000 shares of common stock at a restated par value of $.001. Effective February 23, 2010, the Company completed a 60:1 stock split. The accompanying financial statements have been restated to reflect the change in capital and stock split as if they occurred at the Company’s inception.
Effective February 1, 2010, the Company entered the exploratory stage as defined under the provisions of Accounting Codification Standard (“ASC”) 915-10.
Rodeo Creek Project, Nevada
On February 22, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with Carlin Gold Resources, Inc, (“Carlin”) in which Carlin assigned the Company all of its rights, title, and interest in an exploration agreement between it and Trio Gold Corp (“Trio”). The assigned exploration agreement was dated January 28, 2010. In consideration for the assignment of the interest in the exploration agreement, the Company paid Carlin $1 and issued 100,000 shares of its common stock.
Trio has leased and has an option to purchase a 100% interest in 29 unpatented lode mining claims located in Nevada within the Carlin Gold Trend (the “Claims”). The Claims are subject to a 1.5% Net Smelter Return.
Under the Agreement, the Company earns a 75% undivided interest in the Property during an earn-in period commencing in January 2010 and completing in December 2012 (the “earn-in period”). Upon completion of the earn-in period, a Joint Venture is to be formed with the same 75% / 25% interest the parties held during the earn-in period. The Joint Venture shall remain in effect for twenty-five years or as long as the claims are being actively mined or developed, whichever is longer. After the termination of the Joint Venture, the Claims shall revert back to Trio.
During the earn-in-period, the Company shall provide $5,500,000 in funding to cover operational costs according to the following schedule: $1,500,000 during the 2010 budget year, $2,000,000 during the 2011 budget year and $2,000,000 during the 2012 budget year. Each budget year shall commence on January 1 of that year and end on December 31 of that same year. Once the Company has provided $5,500,000 in funding for the project, the Company and Trio shall fund the operational costs jointly, with the Company providing 75% of the funds and Trio providing 25% of the funds.
The Company is required to pay a minimum annual royalty during the earn-in period to Trio according to the following schedule: $75,000 cash payment upon signing of the agreement, $100,000 cash payment on April 1, 2011 and $150,000 cash payment on April 1, 2012. The Company paid $75,000 to Trio on February 8, 2010.
In addition, within three months of the assignment, the Company is required to issue Trio shares of its common stock equaling 0.20% of its total issued and outstanding as of February 22, 2010. Upon expenditure of a minimum of $2,000,000 on the claims, Trio shall receive an additional 0.10% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common shares. Upon expending a minimum of $4,000,000 million on the claims, Trio shall receive an additional 0.10% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common shares. Upon expenditure of $5,500,000 million on the claims, Trio shall receive a final 0.10% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common shares. All shares issued shall be restricted common shares and will be stamped with the applicable hold period. On February 24, 2010, the Company and Trio Gold, Corp. agreed that the share issuances pursuant to the January 28, 2010 Exploration Agreement shall not exceed 360,600 shares.
Trio is a company incorporated in the Province of Alberta Canada. Trio’s current President is Harry Ruskowsky, the father of the Company’s sole officer and director.
Roger Janssen is the sole officer, director and shareholder of Carlin and a business associate of the Company’s sole officer and director.
About the Rodeo Creek Project Area
Amarok Resources, Inc.
The property is without known reserves and our present program is exploratory in nature.
We believe the property to have potential for the discovery of one or more gold deposits similar to those presently being mined elsewhere along the Carlin Trend in Elko County, Nevada. The property is located approximately 56 km northwest of the town of Carlin. The property comprises 29 contiguous mineral claims covering an area of 547 acres (221 hectares).
Access to the property is limited to unpaved service roads that are subject to weather conditions that can inhibit access to the property.
Previous drilling on the property indicates that the geological and alteration features common to numerous deposits on the Carlin Trend exist at Rodeo Creek, namely NW&NE-trending faults with decalcification, silicification and argillization within the highly prospective Popovich Formation, currently the host to 85% of all deposits along the Carlin Trend.
The property also contains the anomalous geochemical signature of Carlin Trend deposits (As-Sb-Tl) in altered Popovich Formation and as “leakage anomalies” along the NW&NE-trending faults.
One such “leakage” anomaly (Flower Zone) has drill intercepts of up to 9.60 gm/T Au (0.28 oz/t) across 6m, including 29.10 gm/T Au (0.85 oz/t) over 1.5m. Mineralization occurs in a small fault-bound area within 90m of surface, and has the characteristics of a strong leakage anomaly derived from underlying gold mineralization.
Other “leakage” anomalies occur as an intensely altered gold-bearing fault zones (Look and Flower Faults) accompanied by large gold-arsenic soil anomalies traceable over more than 500m of strike length. These anomalies are also believed to represent leakages from deeper gold mineralization.
Exploration permits are current.
Cueva Blanca Gold Property
On April 16, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with St. Elias Mines Ltd. (“St. Elias”) in which Amarok is given an option to earn a 60% interest, subject to a 1.5% net smelter return (“NSR”) royalty, in the Cueva Blanca gold property (1,200 hectares) in Northern Peru, which is wholly owned by St. Elias. Under the terms of the letter agreement, it is possible for the Company to acquire a 60% interest in the Property (subject to a 1.5% NSR) in consideration of: (a) making cash payments of $200,000 to St. Elias over a two-year period; (b) issuing 100,000 common shares in the capital of Amarok to St. Elias; and (c) incurring at least $1,500,000 in exploration expenditures on the Property over a three-year period.
In addition, the Company shall have the right to purchase one-half of the 1.5% NSR from St. Elias for the sum of $1,500,000, thereby reducing the NSR payable to from 1.5% to 0.75%.
The Company’s first payment of $10,000, due on or before April 30, 2010, was postponed due to an unforeseen delay in receiving the documentation necessary for the Company to complete satisfactory due diligence. A letter dated April 30, 2010 between the Company and the President of St. Elias documents an understanding that the agreement shall remain in effect until receipt of proper documentation, upon which the Company will make the payment. The Company continues to work with St. Elias to finalize the formal operating agreement.
The Company’s first payment of $10,000 was paid on June 24, 2010. As of January 31, 2011, the Company has paid $27,603 in fees towards property maintenance costs on the Cueva Blanca property. These payments are applied towards the $200,000 due to St. Elias.
Amarok Resources, Inc.
About the Cueva Blanca Gold Project Area
The property is without known reserves and the present program is exploratory in nature.
The Property is comprised of certain mineral concessions covering approximately 1,200 hectares and is located in the Department of Lambayeque, in northwest Peru.
Access to the property is limited to unpaved service roads that are subject to weather conditions that can inhibit access to the property.
The Company continues to work with St. Elias to finalize the operating agreement. Contingent upon satisfactory completion of an operating agreement with St Elias, the Company will further evaluate the geological data and define an exploration plan.
Amarok Resources, Inc.
Plan of Operation
Our focus is to acquire mineral resource properties for exploration and development with the intent to bring the projects to feasibility at which time we will either contract out the operations or joint venture the project to qualified interested parties.
We had cash of $1,676,976 as of January 31, 2011. In the opinion of management, our available funds may not satisfy our working capital requirements for the next twelve months. Our drilling schedules and minimum expenditure requirements related to our current projects will consume the majority of our current cash over the next twelve months and we are not presently developing any revenue from our operations.
In the event that we experience a shortfall in our capital, we intend to pursue capital through public or private financing as well as borrowings and other sources. We cannot guarantee that additional funding will be available on favorable terms, if at all. If adequate funds are not available, then our ability to expand our operations may be significantly hindered.
We are not currently conducting any research and development activities. We do not anticipate conducting such activities in the near future. We do not anticipate that we will purchase or sell any significant equipment. In the event that we expand our property interests or holdings, then we may need to hire additional employees or independent contractors as well as purchase or lease additional equipment.
Material Contracts and Agreements
The Company currently has the majority of its operations vested in the exploration development of the Rodeo Creek Project under its agreement with Trio Gold Corp. Drilling operations related to the exploration and development of this project are provided through Trio. The Company is required to provide funding only for these operations. This project currently provides no revenue.
Financial Summary
For the three month period ended January 31, 2011 as compared to the three month period ended January 31, 2010.
Revenues.
The Company had revenue for the three month period ended January 31, 2011 of $0 and exploratory costs of $243,683, as compared to the three month period ended January 31, 2010 of revenue $0 and production costs of $0.
Operating Expenses and Net Loss.
The Company’s net loss of $304,615 for the three month period ended January 31, 2011 was comprised of general and administrative expenses of $5,493, management fees to a related party in the amount of $24,000, contributed services of $0, professional fees in the amount of $27,930 and rent expenses of $3,652. The Company also had $143 in net interest income. In comparison to the three month period ended January 31, 2010, the Company’s net loss of $1,500 was comprised of contributed services of $1,500.
Liquidity and Capital Resources.
The Company had cash of $1,676,976 as of January 31, 2011, as compared to $0 as of January 31, 2010. As of the three month period ended January 31, 2011, the Company had prepaid assets of $7,667, as compared to the three month period ended January 31, 2010; the Company had prepaid assets of $0. The Company also has $1,200 in security deposits as of January 31, 2011.
For the three month period ended January 31, 2011, the Company had $21,410 in total current liabilities, which was represented by $7,934 in accounts payable, and $13,476 in related party accounts payable. This is in comparison to the three month period ended January 31, 2010, where the Company had $3,669 in total current liabilities, which was represented by $3,264 in accounts payable, and $405 in related party accounts payable.
Amarok Resources, Inc.
The Company had no long-term liabilities for the three month period ended January 31, 2011; therefore the Company had total liabilities of $21,410. This is in comparison to the three month period ended January 31, 2010, where the Company had no long-term liabilities and total liabilities of $3,669.
The Company is not aware of any known trends, events or uncertainties which may affect its future liquidity.
We are in exploratory stage operations and have not yet generated any revenues. We cannot guarantee we will be successful in our business operations. Our business is subject to risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise, including limited capital resources and possible cost overruns.
We will continue to seek additional financing in order to obtain the capital required to continue implementation of our business plan.
We have no assurance that future financing will be available to us on acceptable terms. If financing is not available to us on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to continue, develop or expand our operations. Equity financing could result in additional dilution to our existing shareholders.
Going Concern
The Company has incurred net losses since inception, and as of January 31, 2011, had a combined accumulated deficit of $2,439,361. These conditions raise substantial doubt as to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. We recognize that the Company must generate additional resources to enable it to continue operations. We intend to raise additional financing through debt financing and equity financing or through other means that it deems necessary, with a view to moving forward and sustaining a prolonged growth in its strategy phases. However, no assurance can be given that the Company will be successful in raising additional capital. Further, even if the Company raises additional capital, there can be no assurance that the Company will achieve profitability or positive cash flow. If we are unable to raise additional capital when needed and expected significant revenues do not result in positive cash flow, the Company will not be able to meet its obligations and may have to cease operations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
None Applicable.
Critical Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The Company follows accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and the results of operations for the periods presented have been reflected herein.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments and other short-term investments with a maturity date of three months or less, when purchased, to be cash equivalents.
Mining Costs
Costs incurred to purchase, lease or otherwise acquire property are capitalized when incurred. General exploration costs and costs to maintain rights and leases are expensed as incurred. Management periodically reviews the recoverability of the capitalized mineral properties. Management takes into consideration various information including, but not limited to, historical production records taken from previous mining operations, results of exploration activities conducted to date, estimated future prices and reports and opinions of outside consultants. When it is determined that a project or property will be abandoned or its carrying value has been impaired, a provision is made for any expected loss on the project or property.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Amarok Resources, Inc.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Pursuant to ASC No. 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, the Company is required to estimate the fair value of all financial instruments included on its balance sheet as of January 31, 2011. The Company’s financial instruments consist of payables and due to related party. The Company considers the carrying value of such amounts in the financial statements to approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments.
Loss Per Share of Common Stock
The Company follows ASC No. 260, Earnings Per Share (ASC No. 260) that requires the reporting of both basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share. Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. The calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. In accordance with ASC No. 260, any anti-dilutive effects on net earnings (loss) per share are excluded. Potential common shares at January 31, 2011 that have been excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share included warrants exercisable into 6,000,000 shares of common stock. There were no potential common shares at January 31, 2010.
Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company maintains its cash in domestic financial institutions subject to insurance coverage issued by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Under FDIC rules, the Company is entitled to aggregate coverage as defined by Federal regulation per account type per separate legal entity per financial institution. During the three months ended January 31, 2011 and 2010, and subsequent thereto, respectively, the Company, from time-to-time, may have had deposits in a financial institution with credit risk exposures in excess of statutory FDIC coverage. The Company has incurred no losses as a result of any unsecured situations.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2010, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-29 (ASU 2010-29), Business Combinations (Topic 805) – Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations. This Accounting Standards Update requires a public entity to disclose pro forma information for business combinations that occurred in the current reporting period. The disclosures include pro forma revenue and earnings of the combined entity for the current reporting period as though the acquisition date for all business combinations that occurred during the year had been as of the beginning of the annual reporting period. If comparative financial statements are presented, the pro forma revenue and earnings of the combined entity for the comparable prior reporting period should be reported as though the acquisition date for all business combinations that occurred during the current year had been as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period. The amendments in this Update affect any public entity as defined by Topic 805 that enters into business combinations that are material on an individual or aggregate basis. The amendments in this Update are effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-29 to have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In August 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-22 (ASU 2010-22), Accounting for Various Topics -- Technical Corrections to SEC Paragraphs - An announcement made by the staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. This Accounting Standards Update amends various SEC paragraphs based on external comments received and the issuance of SAB 112, which amends or rescinds portions of certain SAB topics. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-22 to have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In August 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-21 (ASU 2010-21), Accounting for Technical Amendments to Various SEC Rules and Schedules: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Release No. 33-9026: Technical Amendments to Rules, Forms, Schedules and Codification of Financial Reporting Policies. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-21 to have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In July 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-20 (ASU 2010-20), Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. The amendments in this Update are to provide financial statement users with greater transparency about an entity’s allowance for credit losses and the credit quality of its financing receivables. The disclosures about activity that occurs during the reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-20 to have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In April 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-17 (ASU 2010-17), Revenue Recognition – Milestone Method (Topic 605). ASU 2010-17 provides guidance on applying the milestone method of revenue recognition in arrangements with research and development activities. The amendments in this Update are effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company’s adoption of the provisions of ASU 2010-17 did not have a material impact on its revenue recognition.
Item 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure
s
About Market Risk
We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.
Item 4 - Contr
ol
s and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, Mr. Ruskowski, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer has concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely manner, and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Controls
There has been no change in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
Internal control systems, no matter how well designed and operated, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even a system which is determined to be effective cannot provide absolute assurance that all control issues have been detected or prevented. Our systems of internal controls are designed to provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Amarok Resources, Inc.
Part II - OTHER INFOR
M
ATION
Item 1 - Legal Pro
ce
edings
From time to time the Company may be named in claims arising in the ordinary course of business. We know of no material, existing or pending legal proceedings against our Company, nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation. There are no proceedings in which any of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial shareholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our interest.
Item 2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
an
d Use of Proceeds
None, for the period ending January 31, 2011.
Item 3 - Defaults
u
pon Senior Securities
None, for the period ending January 31, 2011.
Item 4 - [R
em
oved and Reserved]
Item 5 - Other
In
formation
None, for the period ending January 31, 2011.
Item 6 -
E
xhibits
Exhibits
Amarok Resources, Inc. includes by reference the following exhibits:
|
|
3.1
|
Articles of Incorporation, exhibit 3.1 filed with the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S -1, as amended; filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 6, 2009.
|
|
|
3.2
|
Bylaws, filed as exhibit 3.2 with the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended; filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 6, 2009.
|
|
|
3.3
|
Amended Articles of Incorporation, filed as exhibit 3.3 with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 4, 2010.
|
|
|
4.1
|
Form of Warrant, exercisable at $0.75 per share, filed as exhibit 4.1 with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed February 14, 2011.
|
|
|
4.2
|
Form of Warrant, exercisable at $1.25 per share, filed as exhibit 4.2 with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed February 14, 2011.
|
|
|
10.1
|
Assignment of Exploration Agreement between the Company and Carlin Gold Resources, Inc., a Nevada Corporation – signed February 22, 2010; filed as exhibit 10.1 with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 4, 2010.
|
|
|
10.2
|
Exploration Agreement made and entered into as of January 28, 2010, between Carlin Gold Resources, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, and Trio Gold Corp, a company incorporated in the Province of Alberta Canada; filed as exhibit 10.2 with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed March 4, 2010.
|
|
|
10.3
|
Agreement made and entered into as of April 16, 2010, between the Company and St. Elias Mines Ltd.
April 16, 2010
;
filed as exhibit 10.3 with the Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed September 20, 2010
|
|
|
10.4
|
Revision to Exploration Agreement, of January 28, 2010 with, and Trio Gold Corp;
filed as exhibit 10.4 with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed February 14, 2011.
|
Amarok Resources, Inc. includes herewith the following exhibits:
Amarok Resources, Inc.
SIGNA
T
URES
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
Amarok Resources, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: March 11, 2011
|
By:
|
/s/ Ron Ruskowsky
|
|
|
|
|
Ron Ruskowsky
|
|
|
|
|
President, Treasurer and Director
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Financial Officer
|
|
22
3DX Industries (PK) (USOTC:DDDX)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Nov 2024 bis Dez 2024
3DX Industries (PK) (USOTC:DDDX)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Dez 2023 bis Dez 2024
