CBDX Curative Biosciences Inc (CE)

ITEM 4.01 CHANGES IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

On December 29, 2017 (the “Resignation Date”) Pritchett, Siler and Hardy P.C. (“PSH”) resigned as the independent registered public accounting firm for Amaize Beverage Corporation (the “Company”). On December 29, 2017, the Company engaged Haynie & Company, Salt Lake City, Utah, as its new independent registered public accounting firm. The change of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm from PSH to Haynie & Company was approved unanimously by our board of directors.

The reports of PSH on the Company’s financial statements for the two most recent fiscal years did not contain an adverse or disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles.

During the two most recent fiscal years and through the Resignation Date, there were (i) no disagreements between the Company and PSH on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreement, if not resolved to the satisfaction of PSH, would have caused PSH to make reference thereto in their reports on the consolidated financial statements for such years, and (ii) no “reportable events” as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

The Company provided PSH with a copy of this Form 8-K and requested that PSH furnish it with a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether or not PSH agrees with the above statements. A copy of such letter, dated December 29, 2017, is attached as Exhibit 16.1.

During the Company’s two most recent fiscal years and in the subsequent interim period through the Resignation Date, the Company has not consulted with Haynie & Company regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, and neither a written report nor oral advice was provided to the Company that Haynie & Company concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions) or a reportable event (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).