Table of
Contents
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE
14A
Proxy Statement
Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
☑ |
Filed by the Registrant |
☐ |
Filed by a party other than the Registrant |
|
CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX: |
☐ |
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
☐ |
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission
Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
☑ |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
☐ |
|
Definitive Additional
Materials |
☐ |
|
Soliciting Material under
§240.14a-12 |

Altria Group, Inc.
(Name of Registrant
as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the
Registrant)
PAYMENT OF FILING FEE (CHECK ALL BOXES
THAT APPLY): |
☑ |
|
No fee required |
☐ |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary
materials |
☐ |
|
Fee computed on table in exhibit
required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and
0-11 |
Table of
Contents

2022
Notice of
Annual Meeting
of Shareholders and
Proxy Statement
Table of
Contents
Table of
Contents
 |
|
|
6601 West
Broad Street
Richmond, Virginia 23230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Fellow Shareholder: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
I am
pleased to invite you to join us at the 2022 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders of Altria Group, Inc. to be held on Thursday, May 19,
2022 at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time. While dynamics are changing with
regard to the COVID-19 pandemic and pandemic-related restrictions
may be loosening in some areas, out of an abundance of caution we
have decided to hold a virtual meeting again this year using a live
webcast. We made this decision to support the health, well-being
and convenience of our shareholders, employees and the broader
community.
We
believe the virtual format enhances the ability of shareholders to
attend the meeting. In fact, shareholder attendance at our virtual
meetings has been significantly higher compared to attendance at
our in-person meetings. During the 2022 annual meeting,
shareholders will be able to vote their shares electronically and
will have the opportunity to ask questions. In addition, a webcast
replay will be posted to our Investor Relations website at
https://www.altria.com/investors following the meeting. For more
information on our annual meeting, including details on how to
attend the meeting, see the instructions under “Instructions for
the Annual Meeting” on page 71 of this Proxy Statement.
At this
year’s meeting, we will vote on the election of 12 directors, the
ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as
Altria’s independent registered public accounting firm and, if
properly presented, one shareholder proposal. We will also conduct
a non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of Altria’s named
executive officers. We will report on our business, and
shareholders will have an opportunity to ask questions.
Your vote
is very important. I encourage you to complete, sign and return
your proxy card, or use telephone or Internet voting prior to the
meeting, so that your shares will be represented and voted at the
meeting even if you cannot attend.
Sincerely,
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
William
F. Gifford, Jr.
Chief
Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For further information
about the 2022 Annual
Meeting, please call
1-804-484-8838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table of
Contents
Letter from our Board of
Directors
|
|
|
|
Dear Fellow
Shareholder:
It is with great pride
that we serve as Altria’s Board and stewards of your investment. We
actively oversee Altria’s senior management as they lead employees
in pursuing our Vision, manage challenges, such as the COVID-19
pandemic and issues of racial injustice in our communities, foster
a diverse and inclusive corporate culture and navigate a dynamic
business environment.
Altria’s
Vision to “Responsibly
lead the transition of adult smokers to a smoke-free
future”
is being
implemented at a pivotal time for the tobacco industry, as millions
of adult tobacco consumers are seeking alternatives to cigarettes
and regulatory and legislative actions are shaping the future for
reduced harm products. We believe Altria has the experience and
strategic focus to navigate this dynamic environment to deliver
meaningful progress toward achieving the Vision.
As stewards of your
investment in Altria, the Board’s primary responsibility is to
foster Altria’s long-term success by establishing broad corporate
policies, setting strategic direction and overseeing management. In
discharging our responsibilities, we monitor performance against
Altria’s strategic priorities and oversee key risk areas. We also
oversee Altria’s environmental, social and governance (“ESG”)
risks, priorities and initiatives. We encourage you to read more
about Altria’s six responsibility focus areas and its ESG progress
in the Corporate Responsibility Reports, available at
https://www.altria.com/responsibility.
During 2021, we lost a
remarkable member of our team and a pillar of the Richmond,
Virginia community with the passing of our independent Chair,
Thomas F. Farrell II, who had served on our Board for 13 years. Mr.
Farrell’s leadership and his commitment to helping Altria achieve
its Vision provided a strong foundation for Kathryn B. McQuade to
assume the role of independent Chair. Ms. McQuade has served on our
Board for 10 years and is the first woman to serve in this role for
Altria.
We are proud to be a
Board comprised of diverse individuals with extensive leadership
experiences. We believe that our collective experiences, skills and
diverse perspectives enable highly effective oversight and rigorous
decision making.
We thank you for your
investment in Altria and your support for the Board.
Sincerely,
Your Board of
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
Your Board of
Directors
John T. Casteen
III
Marjorie M.
Connelly
R. Matt
Davis
Dinyar S.
Devitre
WilIiam F. Gifford,
Jr.
Debra J.
Kelly-Ennis
W. Leo Kiely
III
Kathryn B.
McQuade
George
Muñoz
Nabil Y.
Sakkab
Virginia E.
Shanks
Ellen R.
Strahlman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table of
Contents

Notice of 2022 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders of Altria Group, Inc.
Items of Business |
|
Board
Recommendation |
1 |
To elect as
directors the 12 nominees named in the accompanying Proxy
Statement. |
|
FOR each
director nominee |
2 |
To ratify the selection
of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Altria’s independent registered
public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2022. |
|
FOR |
3 |
To hold a non-binding
advisory vote to approve the compensation of Altria’s named
executive officers. |
|
FOR |
4 |
To vote on
one shareholder proposal, if properly presented at the
meeting. |
|
AGAINST |
Shareholders will also
transact other business properly coming before the
meeting.
Voting
Your vote is important.
We strongly encourage you to vote as promptly as possible through
the Internet, by telephone or by mailing your completed and signed
proxy card (or voting instruction form, if you hold your shares
through a broker, bank or other nominee). You may also vote during
the meeting by following the instructions under “Instructions for
the Annual Meeting” on page 71 of this Proxy Statement. Each share
is entitled to one vote on each matter to be voted upon at the
annual meeting.
Attending the
Meeting
To attend the virtual
meeting, you will need to enter the 16-digit control number
included on your proxy card, Notice of Internet Availability of
Proxy Materials or voting instruction form. For instructions on
attending the meeting, please see “Instructions for the Annual
Meeting” on page 71 of this Proxy Statement.
2021 Annual
Report
A copy of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021
accompanies this Proxy Statement.
Date of
Distribution
This Notice, the Proxy
Statement and the proxy card are first being made available
or mailed to shareholders on or about April 7,
2022.
By Order of the Board
of Directors,

W. Hildebrandt Surgner, Jr.
Vice President, Corporate Secretary and Associate
General Counsel
April 7, 2022
Richmond, Virginia

Date and
Time
Thursday, May 19, 2022 at
9:00 a.m.,
Eastern Time.

Place
There is no physical
location for Altria’s 2022 Annual Meeting. Shareholders may instead
attend virtually at
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ALTRIA2022.

Who can
vote
You are entitled to vote
if you were a
shareholder of record at the close of
business on March 28, 2022.
|
Important Notice
Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders to be Held on May 19, 2022:
Altria’s Notice of
Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 are available, free of
charge, at https://www.altria.com/proxy.
Under the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission rule that allows companies to
furnish proxy materials to their shareholders over the Internet, we
mail to many shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of
Proxy Materials, rather than a paper copy of this Proxy Statement
and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2021. We believe this expedites shareholders receiving
proxy materials, lowers costs and conserves natural resources. The
Notice of Internet Availability explains how to access the proxy
materials online, vote online and obtain a paper copy of our proxy
materials.
|
Table of
Contents
Proxy Statement – Table
of Contents
Table of
Contents
Proxy Statement Summary
This proxy statement
summary highlights information about Altria Group, Inc. (“Altria,”
“we,” “our” or “us”) and certain information contained elsewhere in
this proxy statement (“Proxy Statement”), which has been prepared
in connection with Altria’s 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
(the “2022 Annual Meeting” or the “meeting”). This summary does not
contain all the information that you should consider in voting your
shares. You should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before
voting.
Voting Matters and
Board Recommendations
Proposal
1 |
|
Election of Directors
Our Board recommends a
vote
FOReach nominee.
►
See page
17.
|
|
|
|
Proposal
2 |
|
Ratification of the Selection of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
Our Board recommends a
vote
FOR this proposal.
►
See page
26.
|
|
|
|
Proposal
3 |
|
Non-Binding Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of Altria’s
Named Executive Officers
Our Board recommends a
vote
FOR this proposal.
►
See page
62.
|
|
|
|
Proposal
4 |
|
Shareholder Proposal to Commission a Civil Rights Equity
Audit
Our Board recommends a
vote
AGAINST this shareholder
proposal.
►
See page
63.
|
|
|
|
Altria
Group, Inc. – Proxy
Statement i
Table of
Contents
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Altria
Overview
Our
Vision
Our
companies have a long history of leadership in the tobacco
industry. Today, adult tobacco consumers are increasingly seeking
new options, including those that reduce risk, and their
preferences are evolving rapidly. Our 2030 Vision is to
“Responsibly lead the
transition of adult smokers to a smoke-free future”
(“Vision”). This Vision drives our focus on Moving Beyond Smoking™
by providing adult smokers more potentially reduced harm
alternatives. To help achieve this Vision, we are working to create
the conditions for tobacco harm reduction to succeed through
external engagement, science and advocacy.
Our Operating
Companies and Investments
We have a
leading portfolio of tobacco products for adult tobacco consumers
that are manufactured and marketed by our tobacco operating company
subsidiaries, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
■Philip
Morris USA Inc. (“PM USA”), the maker of
Marlboro cigarettes;
■U.S.
Smokeless Tobacco Company LLC (“USSTC”), the maker of
Copenhagen and Skoal moist smokeless tobacco
products;
■John
Middleton Co. (“JMC”), the maker of Black
& Mild cigars; and
■Helix
Innovations LLC (“Helix”), the maker of
on! oral nicotine pouches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We seek
to return long-term value to our shareholders through the financial
performance of our tobacco operating company subsidiaries and our
investments in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
■Anheuser-Busch
InBev SA/NV (“ABI”), the world’s largest
brewer;
■JUUL
Labs, Inc. (“JUUL”), the nation’s leading
e-vapor company; and
■Cronos
Group Inc. (“Cronos”), a leading global
cannabinoid company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ii www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
2021 Business
Highlights
We
delivered outstanding results in 2021 and managed through the
challenges presented by the COVID-19 pandemic. Our tobacco
businesses were resilient and, while we faced some challenges along
the way, we continued to make progress toward our
Vision.
Smoke-free
Portfolio
|
■ |
We continued
to invest behind the rapidly growing oral nicotine pouch category
by acquiring the remaining 20% of the global on! business.
Helix made significant progress with on! in the U.S. market
by: |
|
|
|
■ |
growing
on! retail share of the total U.S. oral tobacco category to
3.9 percentage points in the fourth quarter of 2021, an increase of
2.8 percentage points versus the fourth quarter of
2020; |
|
|
|
|
■ |
achieving unconstrained
on! manufacturing capacity for the current estimated size of
the U.S. oral nicotine pouch category; and |
|
|
|
|
■ |
expanding on!
retail distribution to approximately 117,000 U.S.
stores. |
|
|
|
■ |
In heated
tobacco, PM USA introduced the new IQOS 3 device into the
market in the first half of 2021 and expanded the availability of
IQOS and Marlboro HeatSticks to retail stores across
Georgia, Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina. |
|
|
■ |
Although we
had to remove IQOS and Marlboro HeatSticks from the
U.S. market at the end of 2021 due to orders imposed by the
International Trade Commission relating to a patent dispute, PM USA
gained significant knowledge through its earlier IQOS
commercialization efforts, which we believe can be used going
forward to support other smoke-free products. PM USA: |
|
|
|
■ |
gained insight into
educating U.S. adult smokers about a brand-new tobacco category and
effectively supporting their transition journey to smoke-free
alternatives; |
|
|
|
|
■ |
gained valuable
knowledge on leveraging modified risk tobacco product claims to
transition adult smokers; and |
|
|
|
|
■ |
built a
robust post-market surveillance system as required to monitor
tobacco products authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (“FDA”). |
|
|
Financial
Highlights
|
■ |
Our reported
diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) decreased 44.2% to $1.34
primarily driven by the 2021 non-cash impairment of our investment
in ABI. |
|
|
■ |
Our adjusted
diluted EPS, (1) which excludes the impact of special
items, grew 5.7% to $4.61. |
|
|
■ |
We returned
more than $8.1 billion in cash to shareholders in 2021 through
dividends and share repurchases. This total represented the
third-largest single-year cash return in Altria’s history and the
largest annual return since 2002. In August 2021, our Board of
Directors (“Board of Directors” or “Board”) raised the regular
quarterly dividend for the 56th time in the past 52 years. Our
annualized dividend per share was $3.60 as of December 31,
2021. |
|
|
■ |
We sold our
Ste. Michelle Wine Estates business in October 2021 and received
net cash proceeds of approximately $1.2 billion. |
|
|
(1) |
Adjusted diluted EPS is a
financial measure that is not consistent with United States
generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). See Exhibit A to
this Proxy Statement for information regarding non-GAAP financial
measures used in this Proxy Statement and reconciliations of such
non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measures. |
|
|
Altria
Group, Inc. – Proxy Statement iii
Table of
Contents
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

(1) |
Adjusted operating
companies income (“Adjusted OCI”) is a financial measure that is
not consistent with GAAP. See Exhibit A to this Proxy Statement for
information regarding non-GAAP financial measures used in this
Proxy Statement and reconciliations of such non-GAAP financial
measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial
measures. |
(2) |
2021 results include
financial performance of the wine segment prior to our sale of the
Ste. Michelle Wine Estates business on October 1, 2021. |
(3) |
2019
amounts have been recast to conform with current period
presentation for certain ABI mark-to-market adjustments that were
not previously identified as special items and that are now
excluded from Altria’s adjusted financial measures. |
Corporate
Responsibility
We
believe our responsibility priorities and results have been
important factors in our industry leadership for many years. Our
decision to place “responsibly” at the forefront of our Vision
signifies our commitment to corporate responsibility, and we
believe our ongoing efforts to focus on a variety of responsibility
issues further the pursuit of our Vision.
Our Responsibility Focus Areas
In 2020,
we conducted a comprehensive, formal responsibility materiality
assessment to identify environmental, social and governance (“ESG”)
issues that we believe are important to our long-term
sustainability and success. Through the materiality assessment, we
identified six responsibility focus areas to guide our actions
toward achieving our Vision and set goals to allow us to measure
our progress. We highlight below recent accomplishments in each of
the focus areas.
iv www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
2021 Highlights
 |
■ |
Formed
responsibility focus area steering committees, led by senior
executives, to oversee strategic alignment of internal initiatives
with established 2025 corporate responsibility goals. |
|
|
■ |
Established a
cross-functional ESG disclosure team to further enhance governance
of our ESG reporting. |
|
|
■ |
Completed an internal
assessment of our ESG leadership maturity and system readiness to
support potential future independent assessments of select
ESG-related disclosures. |
|
|
■ |
Introduced enhanced
reporting vehicles to further support transparent disclosure of ESG
progress, including ESG Data Tables and a series of Corporate
Responsibility Reports, each focused on one or more of our
responsibility focus areas, including the goals for each area. We
encourage you to read these reports and data tables, which are
available at https://www.altria.com/responsibility. |
|
|
|
 |
■ |
Conducted over 200
tobacco harm reduction engagements with federal and state elected
officials and policymakers. |
|
|
■ |
Advocated that the FDA
address adult smoker nicotine misperceptions to facilitate
transitioning to smoke-free products. |
|
|
■ |
Participated in 15
engagements with the FDA and 34 engagements with public health
stakeholders on harm reduction. |
|
|
■ |
Filed
151 new patents related to harm reduction efforts. |
|
|
■ |
Acquired
the remaining 20% ownership stake of the global on! business
and increased distribution of on! to approximately 117,000
U.S. stores. |
|
|
■ |
Visits
to QuitAssist®, our website dedicated to providing
resources for those who want to quit using tobacco products,
increased by 138% year over year from 2020 to 2021. |
|
|
|
 |
■ |
Engaged with the FDA to
share data from our Underage Tobacco Use Survey to broaden
understanding of the latest product-specific underage tobacco use
trends. |
|
|
■ |
Continued to support
Tobacco 21 laws, which have been enacted at the federal level and
in 39 states and the District of Columbia. |
|
|
■ |
Continued to support
efforts to reduce youth usage of e-vapor, with national survey data
reflecting a decline since 2019. The Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention’s 2021 National Youth Tobacco Survey (“NYTS”) showed
7.6% of middle and high schoolers reported e-vapor use in the past
30 days as compared to 20% in 2019. (1) |
|
|
■ |
Increased use of
point-of-sale age validation technology to more than 104,000 retail
stores representing approximately 62% of PM USA volume. |
|
|
■ |
Granted
over $25 million to positive youth development organizations from
our Board- allocated contributions. |
|
|
(1) |
Due to
differences in data collection procedures, the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention advises that any comparison of the 2021 NYTS
estimates to previous NYTS survey years that were primarily
conducted on school campuses should be interpreted with
caution. |
|
|
|
 |
■ |
Released our first
standalone Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures
(“TCFD”) report – making us the first U.S. tobacco company to join
more than 2,700 supporters of the TCFD. |
|
|
■ |
Signed a
renewable electricity virtual power purchase agreement to
accelerate our progress to achieving our targets of using 100%
renewable electricity and reducing operational greenhouse gas
emissions by 55% by 2030. |
|
|
■ |
Received a
double ‘A’ rating for addressing climate change and protecting
water security by CDP Global (“CDP”) for the second consecutive
year. |
Altria Group, Inc. –
Proxy Statement
v
Table of
Contents
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
 |
■ |
Launched a
$250,000 Stronger Together challenge to support industry-led,
sustainable efforts toward inclusion, diversity and equity
(“ID&E”). We distributed the funds among eight projects
submitted by trade partners, including retailers and wholesalers,
for ID&E education, and training and development programs and
platforms. |
|
|
■ |
Achieved 8.85% diverse
supplier spend against a newly established supplier diversity goal
of 15% or more by 2030. |
|
|
■ |
Increased visibility of
social and environmental responsibility within our supply chain
through 100% contracted tobacco grower participation in the Good
Agricultural Practices Certification program and 100% international
tobacco grower participation in the Sustainable Tobacco Program
self-assessment. In addition, more than 67% of our key suppliers
submitted responses to CDP’s Climate Change, Forest and Water
Security questionnaires at our request. |
|
|
■ |
Recognized as a member
of CDP’s 2021 Supplier Engagement Leaderboard for climate change,
highlighting our work in sustainable supply chain
management. |
|
|
|
 |
■ |
Made progress toward our
Inclusion & Diversity Aiming Point to have 30% of our vice
president-level and director-level employees be employees of color.
As of December 31, 2021, 24% of our vice president-level and 26% of
our director-level employees were people of color. |
|
|
■ |
Expanded use of our
internal talent development system to improve fairness,
transparency and inclusiveness in the internal hiring and promotion
process. 33% of selected internal candidates were employees of
color versus 29% total salaried population and 54% were female
versus 42% total salaried population. |
|
|
■ |
For employees performing
the same or similar duties, salaries of female employees were 99.6%
of those of our male employees and salaries of employees of color
were 99.9% of those of our white employees after adjusting for
factors generally considered to be legitimate differentiators of
salary, such as performance and tenure. |
|
|
■ |
Created a
new five year community impact plan and contributed approximately
$61 million to local and national non-profit organizations in five
focus areas: positive youth development and preventing underage
use; employee giving, volunteering and civic action; workforce and
economic equity; environment; and equitable and vibrant
communities. |
vi www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Board
Nominees
You are
being asked to vote on the following 12 nominees for director. All
directors are elected annually by a majority of the votes cast.
More information about each director can be found under “Proposal 1
– Election of Directors” beginning on page 17.
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
Board Committee Membership (1) (2) |
Name and
Principal Occupation |
|
Age |
|
Since |
|
Independent |
|
AC |
CC |
EC |
FC |
IC |
NC |
Ian L.T. Clarke
Chief
Financial Officer, Greater Toronto Airports Authority |
|
61 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marjorie M. Connelly
Retired Chief
Operating Officer, Convergys Corporation |
|
60 |
|
2021 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
R. Matt Davis
President,
Driftwood Leadership, LLC and retired President,
North America,
and Senior Vice President, Global Corporate Affairs, Dow
Inc. |
|
57 |
|
2021 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
William F. Gifford,
Jr.
Chief Executive Officer, Altria Group, Inc. |
|
51 |
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Debra J. Kelly-Ennis
Retired
President and Chief Executive Officer,
Diageo Canada,
Inc. |
|
65 |
|
2013 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
W. Leo Kiely III
Retired Chief
Executive Officer, MillerCoors LLC |
|
75 |
|
2011 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Kathryn B. McQuade
Retired
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
Canadian
Pacific Railway Limited |
|
65 |
|
2012 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
George Muñoz
Principal,
Muñoz Investment Banking Group, LLC
and Partner,
Tobin & Muñoz |
|
70 |
|
2004 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
Nabil Y. Sakkab
Retired Senior
Vice President, Corporate Research and
Development,
The Procter & Gamble Company |
|
74 |
|
2008 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Virginia E. Shanks
Retired
Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative
Officer,
Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. |
|
61 |
|
2017 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Ellen R. Strahlman
Retired
Executive Vice President, Research &
Development
and Chief
Medical Officer, Becton, Dickinson and Company |
|
64 |
|
2020 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
M. Max Yzaguirre
Retired
Executive Chairman, Forbes Bros. Holdings, Ltd. |
|
61 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
AC |
Audit
Committee |
EC |
Executive
Committee |
IC |
Innovation
Committee |
|
CC |
Compensation
and Talent
Development Committee |
FC |
Finance
Committee |
NC |
Nominating,
Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility
Committee |
|
 |
Chair |
 |
Member |
 |
Audit
Committee Financial Expert |
(2) |
At our Board’s
organizational meeting following the 2022 Annual Meeting, our Board
plans to determine 2022-2023 committee assignments. |
Composition and Diversity of Board Nominees
The
composition of our Board nominees is as follows:

More
information on the self-identified diversity demographics of our
Board and nominees can be found in “Board Skills and Experience and
Demographic Backgrounds” on page 2
Altria
Group, Inc. – Proxy Statement vii
Table of
Contents
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Corporate Governance
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board Independence and Composition |
|
Board Performance and Key Responsibilities |
|
|
■ 11 of our 12 director nominees
are independent
■ Separate Chair and Chief
Executive Officer (“CEO”) roles, with an independent
Chair
■ All NYSE-required Board
committees consist solely of independent directors
■ Independent Committee
Chairs
■ Executive sessions of
independent directors at each meeting
■ Director retirement
guidelines
■ Board diversity from various
perspectives
|
|
■ At least 75% Board and
Committee meeting attendance in 2021 by each director, during each
director’s respective term of service
■ 100% director attendance at
our 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (“2021 Annual Meeting”) by
directors who were then serving
■ Oversight of strategic plan
development and execution
■ Oversight of key risk areas
and risk management processes
■ Oversight of executive
compensation
■ Participation in executive
succession planning
■ Review of investor
perspectives and engagement
■ Annual Board and Committee
self-evaluations
■ Oversight of corporate culture
initiatives
■ Oversight of ESG program and
activities, including stakeholder engagement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder Rights |
|
Policies, Programs and Guidelines |
|
|
■ Annual election of
directors
■ Directors elected by majority
voting except in contested elections
■ Resignation policy for
directors who fail to receive majority support in an uncontested
election
■ One share, one-vote
standard
■ Proxy access with market
terms
■ No shareholder rights plan or
“poison pill”
|
|
■ Comprehensive Code of Conduct,
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors and Corporate
Governance Guidelines
■ Robust political activity
disclosure and compliance program
■ Extensive Corporate
Responsibility Reports
■ Compensation “clawback”
policy
■ Robust stock ownership and
holding requirements for directors and executive
officers
■ Policies prohibiting hedging
and pledging of our shares by directors and executive
officers
■ Comprehensive new director
orientation and ongoing director education programs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We
believe the foregoing practices are well aligned with the Investor
Stewardship Group’s corporate governance principles for U.S. listed
companies, which include (i) accountability to shareholders, (ii)
shareholder voting rights proportionate to economic interest, (iii)
responsiveness to shareholders, (iv) strong, independent
leadership, (v) structures and practices that enhance Board
effectiveness and (vi) management incentive structures aligned with
long-term strategy. |
|
|
|
|
viii www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Stakeholder
Engagement
We value
our stakeholders’ perspectives on our businesses and engage with a
broad range of stakeholders on a variety of matters.
Shareholder engagement
Investor
conferences
Individual investor meetings
Annual shareholder meeting
Additional stakeholder engagement
Regulators,
policymakers, community leaders, financial institutions, public
health groups, sustainability organizations, suppliers, trade
partners, consumers, industry groups
|
 |
Topics discussed
Business
performance
Company strategies
ESG
Executive compensation Regulatory and legislative
environment Public policy issues
|
A variety
of our executives participate in our stakeholder engagement efforts
depending on the nature and topic of the engagement, including our
CEO, Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), General Counsel, Chief Human
Resources Officer and Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”), Senior Vice
President, Corporate Citizenship and Chief Sustainability Officer,
Corporate Secretary and representatives from our Investor
Relations, Regulatory Affairs, Government Affairs and Compensation
and Benefits departments. From time to time, members of our Board
of Directors also participate in engagement activities. We believe
that these engagements provide us with a better understanding of
our stakeholders’ priorities and perspectives.
Executive
Compensation Highlights
Executive Compensation Framework
In 2021,
the total direct compensation of our executive officers named in
the Summary Compensation Table on page 51 (“named executive
officers” or “NEOs”) consisted of the following
elements:
|
|
|
Form
of
Compensation |
|
Performance
Period |
|
Award
Criteria |
|
Company
Performance Alignment |
 |
|
 |
Cash |
|
Ongoing |
|
Individual
performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Cash |
|
Annual |
|
Company
and individual performance |
|
■ Adjusted diluted EPS
growth
■ Adjusted discretionary cash
flow
■ Total adjusted OCI
■ Strategic
initiatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Cash |
|
Three years;
overlapping cycles |
|
Company and individual
performance |
|
■ Adjusted diluted EPS
growth
■ Cash conversion
■ Relative total shareholder
return (“TSR”) multiplier
■ Strategic
initiatives
|
|
 |
Restricted Stock
Units (“RSUs”)/ Performance Stock Units
(“PSUs”) |
|
Ongoing
for RSUs, three years for PSUs |
|
Individual performance
and advancement potential with additional payment criteria for PSUs
based on company performance |
|
■ RSUs: Stock price
appreciation
■ PSUs: Company performance
(adjusted diluted EPS growth, cash conversion and relative TSR
multiplier) and stock price appreciation
|
Together,
PSUs and our cash Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) deliver over
60% of our NEOs’ target long-term incentives in performance-based
forms. Our target long-term incentive mix is described under
“Long-Term Incentives” on page 42.
Altria
Group, Inc. – Proxy Statement ix
Table of
Contents
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Key Governance Features of Our Executive Compensation
Program
The
following summary highlights our commitment to executive
compensation practices that align the interests of our executives
and shareholders:
|
What
We Do |
|
What
We Don’t Do |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Pay for Performance A
significant portion of our NEOs’ compensation is at-risk variable
compensation. Annual and long-term cash incentives and a
significant portion of equity compensation are tied to performance
measures.

Multiple Performance Metrics Variable
compensation is based on more than one measure to balance
incentives.

Stock Holding and Ownership
Requirements All
NEOs exceed our robust stock ownership requirements.

“Clawback” Policy Our
policy provides for the adjustment or recovery of compensation in
certain circumstances.

Award Caps All
our variable compensation plans have caps on plan
formulas.

Below Average Share Utilization We
have below average run rates for equity compensation, as compared
to S&P 500 and Food, Beverage & Tobacco Indices
companies.

Tally Sheets Our
Compensation and Talent Development Committee uses tally sheets
when making individual compensation decisions for our
NEOs.

Confidentiality and Non-Compete
Agreements All
our NEOs are subject to confidentiality and non-compete
agreements.
|
|

No Excessive Perquisites Perquisites
represent less than 1% of our NEOs’ compensation.

No Single-Trigger Change in Control Our
shareholder-approved 2015 Performance Incentive Plan (“PIP”) and
2020 PIP both include a double-trigger change in control
provision.

No Individual Supplemental Executive Retirement
Plans

No Hedging or Pledging We do
not permit our NEOs to engage in either hedging or pledging
activities with respect to their Altria shares.

No Employment Agreements All
our NEOs are employed at-will.

No Tax Gross-Ups on Compensation We do
not pay tax gross-ups to our NEOs.

No Share Recycling

No PSUs for Stock Ownership
Requirements We do
not include unvested PSUs toward stock ownership
requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
Board and Governance Matters
Altria Board of
Directors
Our Board
currently consists of 12 directors. Directors are elected annually
at each annual meeting to serve until the next annual meeting and
until their successors are duly elected and qualified, subject to
their earlier death, resignation or removal. With the exception of
Marjorie M. Connelly and R. Matt Davis, who were elected as
directors by our Board on October 27, 2021, and Ian L.T. Clarke and
M. Max Yzaguirre, who were nominated for election as directors by
our Board, each of the nominees for director was elected by
shareholders at the 2021 Annual Meeting. Biographical information
and qualifications of the nominees for director are included under
“Proposal 1 – Election of Directors” beginning on page 17. In
October 2021 and February 2022, John T. Casteen III and Dinyar S.
Devitre, respectively, notified Altria of their decision to retire
from Board service following the completion of their current term.
As a result, Messrs. Casteen and Devitre will not stand for
election to our Board at the 2022 Annual Meeting; all other current
directors are standing for election at the 2022 Annual
Meeting.
Process for
Nominating Directors
The
Nominating, Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility
Committee works with our Board to determine the appropriate mix of
characteristics, skills and experience for our Board. The Committee
evaluates each individual in the context of our Board as a whole,
with the objective of recommending a group of directors that can
best continue the success of the business and represent shareholder
interests through the exercise of sound judgment using its
diversity of experience.
The
Committee has not established any specific minimum qualification
standards for nominees to our Board; rather, in evaluating the
suitability of individuals for Board membership, the Committee
considers the ways in which it believes each individual can assist
Altria in pursuing our Vision. The Committee takes into account
many factors, including whether the individual meets requirements
for independence and whether the individual will enhance the
diversity of views and experiences available to our Board in its
operations and in discharging its oversight responsibilities. In
determining whether to recommend a director for re-election, the
Committee also considers the director’s past attendance at meetings
and participation in and contributions to the activities of our
Board. In addition, the Committee considers whether our Board has
specific needs for certain skills or attributes at a given time.
Other criteria for Board membership, such as the extent of an
individual’s other commitments, are set forth in our Corporate
Governance Guidelines.
In identifying potential
candidates for Board membership, the Committee relies on
suggestions and recommendations from directors, shareholders,
management and others, including from time to time executive search
and board advisory firms. Messrs. Clarke and Yzaguirre and Ms.
Connelly were recommended to the Committee by one of our
non-management directors and Mr. Davis was brought to the attention
of the Committee by an executive search firm engaged by management
to identify potential director candidates. The Committee does not
distinguish between nominees recommended by shareholders and other
nominees. Shareholders wishing to suggest candidates to the
Committee for consideration as directors must submit a written
notice to our Corporate Secretary following the procedures set
forth in this Proxy Statement under “Questions and Answers about
Communications, Altria Documents and Shareholder Proposals – How do
I communicate with our Board of Directors?” on page 78. Our Amended
and Restated By-Laws (“By-Laws”) include the procedures that a
shareholder must follow to nominate directors for election to our
Board. The procedures are summarized under the same section in
response to the question “How can a shareholder nominate a director
or submit a proposal for next year’s annual meeting?” on page
78.
Altria
Group, Inc. – Proxy Statement 1
Table of
Contents
BOARD AND GOVERNANCE
MATTERS
Commitment to Board
Diversity
The
Nominating, Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility
Committee has a long-standing commitment to diversity and is guided
by our diversity philosophy in its review and consideration of
director nominees. In this regard, our Board and the Committee view
diversity holistically and are committed to recruiting directors
who help achieve the goal of a well-rounded, diverse Board. Our
Corporate Governance Guidelines require that women and people of
color be included in any search for potential new directors. Our
Corporate Governance Guidelines also require that our Board and the
Committee consider, among other factors:
■ |
whether the individual
meets the applicable requirements for independence; |
■ |
the individual’s general
understanding of the various disciplines relevant to the success of
a large publicly traded company in today’s global business
environment; |
■ |
the individual’s
understanding of our businesses and markets; |
■ |
the individual’s skills,
professional expertise and educational background; and |
■ |
other
factors that promote diversity of views and experiences, including
self-identified characteristics such as gender, race, national
origin, age and sexual orientation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board
and
5 of
6
Board
Committees are Chaired by Women or Ethnically Diverse
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board Skills and Experience
and Demographic Backgrounds
Our current Board and
nominees have a breadth of skills, experiences and demographic
backgrounds, and our Board is committed to reviewing periodically
its composition so that it continues to have the right mix of
skills, background and tenure. As noted in the summary below, we
believe that our Board and nominees have demonstrated leadership in
a variety of positions across various professions and industries.
In addition, our Board’s composition represents a balanced approach
to director tenure, allowing our Board to benefit from the historic
institutional knowledge of longer-serving directors combined with
the perspectives of newer directors. The following chart is not
intended to be an exhaustive list of each director’s and nominee’s
skills, expertise, experience and personal attributes to our Board,
as each of them also contributes other important skills, expertise,
experience and personal attributes that are not reflected in the
chart.
2 www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
BOARD AND GOVERNANCE
MATTERS
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Skills
and Experience |
Consumer
Products and/or Consumer Marketing |
|
|
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
|
|
■ |
■ |
■ |
|
Industry |
|
|
|
|
■ |
■ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulated
Industries |
|
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
|
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
Chief
Executive Officer Experience |
■ |
|
|
■ |
|
■ |
■ |
■ |
|
■ |
|
|
|
■ |
Financial Expertise,
including Chief Financial Officer Experience |
|
■ |
■ |
|
■ |
■ |
|
|
■ |
■ |
|
|
|
■ |
Public
Policy |
■ |
|
■ |
■ |
|
|
|
|
|
■ |
|
|
■ |
■ |
Public
Company Board Experience |
■ |
■ |
■ |
|
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
Leadership in
Innovation |
|
|
|
|
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
|
|
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
Information
Technology/Cybersecurity |
|
|
■ |
|
|
|
|
|
■ |
|
|
■ |
|
■ |
Environmental,
Social and Governance |
|
|
■ |
■ |
|
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
|
|
|
■ |
■ |
Diversity
and Demographic Background |
Race
/Ethnicity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
African
American or Black |
|
■ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hispanic
or Latinx |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
■ |
|
|
|
■ |
White or
Caucasian |
■ |
|
■ |
■ |
|
■ |
■ |
■ |
■ |
|
|
■ |
■ |
|
Asian |
|
|
|
|
■ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle
Eastern |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
■ |
|
|
|
Gender and
Other Diversity Characteristics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Female |
|
|
■ |
|
|
|
■ |
|
■ |
|
|
■ |
■ |
|
Male |
■ |
■ |
|
■ |
■ |
■ |
|
■ |
|
■ |
■ |
|
|
■ |
LGBTQ+ |
|
|
■ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Age |
78 |
61 |
60 |
57 |
74 |
51 |
65 |
75 |
65 |
70 |
74 |
61 |
64 |
61 |
Tenure
(1) |
12 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
14 |
2 |
9 |
10 |
10 |
17 |
13 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
(1) |
Calculated from the date
of initial election to the next full year of completed service
prior to filing the Proxy Statement. Partial years of service
exceeding six months are rounded up. |
|
|
Board Skill |
|
Why this Skill is Important to Our
Board |
Consumer Products and/ or
Consumer Marketing |
|
Our continued leadership in satisfying evolving
adult tobacco consumers preferences requires that we market our
products effectively and responsibly. |
Industry |
|
Experience in our industries and markets is
important to understanding industry and market
dynamics. |
Regulated
Industries |
|
Altria operates highly regulated businesses. To
enhance Board oversight of regulatory compliance and engagement, we
include directors with experience in regulated
industries. |
Chief Executive Officer
Experience |
|
Directors who serve or have served as a chief
executive (including chief executive of a significant business
unit) bring leadership experience in various areas such as
strategic planning, financial oversight, executive succession
planning, human capital management, compliance and risk
management. |
Financial Expertise,
including Chief Financial Officer Experience |
|
Proficiency in finance and financial reporting
processes helps our Board monitor and assess Altria’s performance
and financial reporting. |
Public
Policy |
|
Directors with public policy experience provide
valuable insights as Altria’s businesses are subject to an array of
federal, state and local laws and regulations and regularly engage
with various external stakeholders. |
Public Company Board
Experience |
|
Service on other public company boards promotes
efficient and effective Board processes and provides insight into
the corporate governance practices of other companies. |
Leadership in
Innovation |
|
Directors with experience in innovation,
biosciences, product development and consumer engagement promote
effective oversight of product growth opportunities (including for
reduced harm products), marketing strategies and capabilities, and
other growth strategies. |
Information
Technology/Cybersecurity |
|
Directors with insight into mitigating technology
risks enhance oversight of our cybersecurity risk management
program. |
Environmental, Social and
Governance |
|
We believe ESG topics, including our harm reduction
efforts, are important to our long-term success. Directors with
experience managing or overseeing ESG efforts provide effective
oversight of our ESG strategies and initiatives. |
Altria
Group, Inc. – Proxy Statement 3
Table of
Contents
BOARD AND GOVERNANCE
MATTERS
Director Independence
Determinations
Under the
listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), our
Board must consist of a majority of independent directors. In
making independence determinations, our Board adheres to NYSE and
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) requirements and
considers all relevant facts and circumstances. Our Board has also
adopted categorical standards of director independence to further
assist it in making these determinations. These standards are set
forth in Annex A of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are
available on our website at
https://www.altria.com/governance.
On the
recommendation of the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Social
Responsibility Committee, our Board affirmatively determined that
each of the following nominees is independent in that such nominee
has no material relationship with us: Ian L.T. Clarke, Marjorie M.
Connelly, R. Matt Davis, Debra J. Kelly-Ennis, W. Leo Kiely III,
Kathryn B. McQuade, George Muñoz, Nabil Y. Sakkab, Virginia E.
Shanks, Ellen R. Strahlman and M. Max Yzaguirre. Our Board has also
affirmatively determined on the recommendation of the Committee
that John T. Casteen III and Dinyar S. Devitre, who are not
standing for election to our Board at the 2022 Annual Meeting, are
independent. In making its recommendation to our Board, the
Committee considered the following business relationships and
transactions:
Business Relationships and Transactions Considered |
Altria
and our subsidiaries from time to time do business in the ordinary
course on terms comparable to those provided to unrelated third
parties with entities where Messrs. Devitre and Muñoz serve as
non-executive directors or where immediate family members (as
defined in our Policy on Related Person Transactions, which is
discussed under “Related Person Transactions and Code of Conduct”
on page 69) of Mr. Clarke, Mr. Davis, Mr. Kiely, Dr. Sakkab, Dr.
Strahlman or Mr. Yzaguirre serve as non-executive directors or
non-executive employees. In each case, neither the director nor the
immediate family member is responsible for, or involved in, the
entity’s day-to-day dealings with us, and the respective payments
made by Altria and our subsidiaries to the entities in each of the
last three fiscal years were significantly less than the greater of
$1 million or 2% of any such entity’s consolidated gross revenues.
None of Mr. Clarke, Mr. Davis, Mr. Devitre, Mr. Kiely, Mr. Muñoz,
Dr. Sakkab, Dr. Strahlman or Mr. Yzaguirre, or their respective
immediate family members, materially benefits directly or
indirectly from these relationships. |
The Committee determined
that the foregoing business relationships and transactions did not
affect the independence of any nominee for director.
In making its
recommendation to our Board, the Committee also considered the
following philanthropic relationships and transactions between
Altria and our subsidiaries and various educational and other
charitable entities located in or near our locations or facilities
of our subsidiaries. We believe that corporate philanthropy
furthers our corporate responsibility focus on supporting our
people and communities, which includes investing to help make
ongoing positive societal impact in priority areas that reflect the
interests of our businesses, employees and communities.
Philanthropic Relationships and Transactions
Considered |
We
have a long-standing relationship with the University of Virginia
(the “University”) that has included employment recruiting and
charitable donations. In 2021, Altria and our subsidiaries made
charitable donations to the University in an aggregate amount of
$445,000 with the significant majority supporting the University’s
Youth-Nex Center, which promotes positive youth development. In
addition, we made nominal ordinary course trade payments to the
University. The sum of these 2021 contributions and payments
represented significantly less than the greater of $1 million or 2%
of the University’s consolidated gross revenues. Mr. Casteen is a
former President of the University and retired Professor. Mr.
Casteen’s son, John T. Casteen IV, is an Assistant Professor and
Director of Studies at the University. Neither Mr. Casteen nor his
son materially benefits directly or indirectly from this
relationship. |
We make various grants and
charitable contributions, including matching gifts under our
Matching Gift Program, to entities where Mr. Casteen, Ms. Connelly,
Mr. Davis, Mr. Devitre and Ms. Kelly-Ennis or their respective
immediate family members serve as non-executive directors or
trustees or non-executive employees. In each case, payments by us
in each of the last three fiscal years were significantly less than
the greater of $1 million or 2% of any such entity’s consolidated
gross revenues. None of Mr. Casteen, Ms. Connelly, Mr. Davis, Mr.
Devitre or Ms. Kelly-Ennis, or their respective immediate family
members, materially benefits directly or indirectly from these
contributions.
The Committee determined
that the foregoing philanthropic relationships and transactions did
not affect the independence of any director or nominee for
director.
4 www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
BOARD AND GOVERNANCE
MATTERS
Board and Committee
Governance
Our Board’s Role and
Responsibilities
The
primary responsibility of our Board is to foster our long-term
success. In fulfilling this role, each director must exercise his
or her good faith business judgment of the best interests of Altria
and our shareholders. Our Board has responsibility for establishing
broad corporate policies, setting strategic direction and
overseeing management, which is responsible for our day-to-day
operations.
Board Leadership Structure
and Governance
Our Board
believes that it is important to retain the flexibility to allocate
the responsibilities of the Chair and the CEO in a way that it
considers to be in the best interests of Altria and our
shareholders. Our Board currently believes it is in the best
interests of Altria and our shareholders to separate these
positions. Our Board believes that separating the roles of Chair
and CEO promotes the pursuit of our Vision by allowing our CEO, our
senior-most executive, to focus on executing our strategic plan,
overseeing our day-to-day operations, engaging with external
stakeholders, developing our leaders and promoting employee
engagement through an inclusive culture. Meanwhile, the Chair leads
our Board in the performance of its duties by establishing agendas
and ensuring appropriate meeting content, engaging with the CEO
between Board meetings and providing overall guidance to our CEO as
to our Board’s views and perspectives. Moreover, our independent
directors convene at each Board meeting in an executive session led
by the Chair. Our current Chair, Ms. McQuade, has served on our
Board since 2012 and was elected by our Board as independent Chair
in 2021 following the passing of Thomas F. Farrell II, our former
independent Chair. Her extensive knowledge of our business, our
management and our Board’s governance practices provided for a
smooth transition to this leadership position. Ms. McQuade promotes
constructive dialogue and directly, clearly and regularly
communicates the views of our Board to management.
We believe that our
Board’s strict adherence to sound corporate governance practices,
as reflected in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, has promoted,
and continues to promote, effective and independent Board
leadership for Altria and our shareholders.
Altria
Group, Inc. – Proxy Statement 5
Table of
Contents
BOARD AND GOVERNANCE
MATTERS
Our Board’s Oversight
Role
Our
Board’s oversight role extends to a broad range of topics that we
believe are important to our external stakeholders and to the
success of our businesses.

Strategic Oversight |
 |
Our Board
actively oversees the development and execution of strategies in
pursuit of our Vision. These strategies encompass both financial
and operational strategies, including strategies focused on growth
and innovation, legal and regulatory matters, ESG, public policy
and engagement, talent development and executive succession, and
strategic investments. Over the course of the year, including
during meetings solely focused on strategy and long-term planning,
management and our Board discuss the development and execution of
our strategic plans as well as events that bear upon those plans.
Our Board further monitors strategic execution through standing
presentations at regular Board and Committee meetings and
communications from management in between meetings. |
Our Board devotes several meetings each year to review our
strategies and discuss them with management. |
Risk Oversight |
 |
Our
Board, both acting as a full Board and through its Committees,
plays an important oversight role in our risk management processes
and believes it has in place effective processes to identify and
oversee key risks facing Altria and our businesses. Regular Board
and Committee meetings afford our Board the opportunity to discuss
with senior and mid-level management the risks facing Altria and
our businesses.
Our enterprise risk
management process helps us identify, prioritize and manage risks
that have the potential to present the most significant obstacles
to achieving business objectives. Our Risk Oversight Committee,
comprised of members of senior management, including our CFO, Chief
Operating Officer (“COO”), General Counsel and CCO, meets regularly
to oversee efforts undertaken to identify and manage the most
significant risks to Altria and our businesses. Management reports
annually to our Board on this process and periodically to our Board
or its Committees on the management of specific risks.
6 www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
BOARD AND GOVERNANCE
MATTERS

Altria
Group, Inc. – Proxy Statement 7
Table of
Contents
BOARD AND GOVERNANCE
MATTERS
Political and Public Policy Oversight |
 |
The
Nominating, Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility
Committee oversees our political and public policy engagement
activities, including political and direct and indirect lobbying
activities and related contributions and expenditures. The
Committee also oversees our political activity compliance
program.
We share
extensive information about political and public policy activities
and Board oversight of these activities in our Lobbying and
Political Activity Integrity and Transparency Report and also
provide disclosures related to our lobbying expenditures and
political contributions on our website at
https://www.altria.com/About-Altria/Government-Affairs/.
Corporate Responsibility and ESG Oversight |
 |
Leading
responsibly has been the foundation of Altria’s strategy for many
years, and our Board actively oversees our corporate responsibility
and ESG priorities. Our approach to corporate responsibility
includes seeking our shareholders’ and other stakeholders’
perspectives, aligning business practices where appropriate and
measuring and communicating our progress.
Our Board
regularly receives updates on our responsibility efforts. These
updates include the review of topics such as trends in corporate
responsibility, our underage tobacco prevention program, harm
reduction initiatives, environmental initiatives, community and
public policy engagement activities, talent and culture
initiatives, and our monitoring and reporting of ESG progress. Our
Board has delegated oversight responsibilities in these areas to
the following committees:
■ |
Nominating, Corporate
Governance and Social Responsibility Committee – oversees our
public affairs, corporate reputation, governance and environmental
and social responsibility strategies. |
|
|
■ |
Innovation Committee –
oversees our product innovation efforts and strategies that are
critical to our harm reduction goals, as well as our efforts to
reduce environmental impact of our manufacturing operations and
products. |
|
|
■ |
Compensation and Talent
Development Committee – oversees our corporate culture and talent
development activities as further discussed below. |
|
|
Talent Development and Culture Oversight |
 |
The
Compensation and Talent Development Committee oversees initiatives,
programs and processes related to talent development and culture
through regular updates from management.
In 2021,
these updates included:
■ |
executive succession and
advancement planning; |
|
|
■ |
employee engagement
survey results and management’s proposed responses to opportunity
areas; |
|
|
■ |
actions taken to protect
employee health and wellness during the COVID-19 pandemic;
and |
|
|
■ |
management’s progress
toward its ID&E goals. |
8 www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
BOARD AND GOVERNANCE
MATTERS
CEO Succession and
Advancement Planning
Our Board
believes that senior executive advancement and succession is one of
its most important responsibilities. The Compensation and Talent
Development Committee is responsible for overseeing the development
and furtherance of executive succession plans, evaluating and
making recommendations to our Board regarding potential candidates
to become CEO, and evaluating and approving candidates to fill
other senior executive positions.

Committees of Our
Board of Directors
Our Board
has established various standing Committees to assist it with the
performance of its responsibilities. Our Board elects the members
of these Committees and the Committee Chairs annually at its
organizational meeting following our annual meeting of
shareholders, based on the recommendations of the Nominating,
Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility Committee. The Chair
of each Committee develops with management the meeting agendas for
that Committee. After each meeting, each Committee provides a full
report to our Board.
Our Board
has adopted written charters for each of its Committees. These
charters are available on our website at
https://www.altria.com/governance. The following charts summarize
the primary responsibilities and composition of each of the
Committees:
|
Audit
Committee |
2021
Meetings: 7 |
Report: See
page 25 |
|
|
Chair |
Other
Members |
|
|
|
|
|
George Muñoz |
John T.
Casteen III |
Debra J.
Kelly-Ennis |
Virginia E.
Shanks |
|
|
|
|
Marjorie M.
Connelly |
Kathryn B.
McQuade |
Ellen R.
Strahlman |
|
|
|
Primary responsibilities
include:
■ Assisting
our Board in its oversight of (i) the integrity of our financial
statements and financial reporting processesand
systems of internal control, (ii) the qualifications, independence
and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm, (iii) the internal auditors and the
internal audit function, (iv) our risk assessment and risk
management policies and practices and (v) our
compliance with legal and regulatory
requirements.
■ Preparing
the Audit Committee report that the rules of the SEC require us to
include in our proxy statement.
See “Audit Committee
Matters” beginning on page 24 for further information on the Audit
Committee.
The Audit Committee
consists entirely of non-management directors all of whom our Board
has determined are independent within the meaning of the listing
standards of the NYSE and Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Our Board has determined
that all members of the Audit Committee are financially literate
and that Ms. Connelly, Mr. Muñoz and Ms. McQuade are “audit
committee financial experts” within the meaning set forth in the
regulations of the SEC.
|
|
Altria Group, Inc. –
Proxy Statement 9
Table of
Contents
BOARD AND GOVERNANCE
MATTERS
|
Compensation
and Talent Development Committee |
2021
Meetings: 4 |
Report:
See page 28 |
|
|
Chair |
Other
Members |
|
|
|
|
|
W. Leo Kiely
III |
John T. Casteen
III |
Kathryn B.
McQuade |
|
|
|
|
|
Dinyar S.
Devitre |
Virginia E.
Shanks |
|
|
|
|
Primary responsibilities
include:
■ Determining
and approving CEO compensation and reviewing and approving the
compensation of our other executive
officers.
■ Overseeing
the development of executive succession plans and evaluating and
making recommendations to our
Board regarding potential CEO candidates and evaluating and
approving candidates for other senior executive positions.
■ Evaluating
the design and effectiveness of our overall compensation program
and monitoring risks related to such
design.
■ Reviewing
initiatives and programs related to corporate culture and talent
development.
See
“Executive Compensation” beginning on page 27 for further
information on the Compensation and Talent Development
Committee.
The Compensation and
Talent Development Committee consists entirely of non-management
directors all of whom our Board has determined are independent
within the meaning of the listing standards of the NYSE and
non-employee directors for the purposes of Rule 16b-3 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
Executive
Committee |
|
|
2021
Meetings: 0 |
|
|
Chair |
Other
Members |
|
|
|
|
|
Kathryn
B. McQuade |
Dinyar
S. Devitre |
Debra J.
Kelly-Ennis |
George
Muñoz |
|
|
|
|
William F. Gifford,
Jr. |
W. Leo Kiely
III |
Nabil Y.
Sakkab |
|
|
|
■ Has
authority to act for our Board during intervals between Board
meetings to the extent permitted by Virginia law. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance
Committee |
|
|
2021
Meetings: 8 |
|
|
Chair |
Other
Members |
|
|
|
|
|
Dinyar
S. Devitre |
R. Matt
Davis |
George
Muñoz |
|
|
|
|
|
W. Leo Kiely
III |
Nabil Y.
Sakkab |
|
|
|
|
Primary responsibilities
include:
■ Monitoring
our financial condition, overseeing the sources and uses of cash
flow and advising our Board with respect
to financing needs, dividend policy, share repurchase programs,
mergers, acquisitions, divestitures and similar capital allocation matters, and other financial
matters.
|
|
10 www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
BOARD AND GOVERNANCE
MATTERS
|
Innovation
Committee |
|
2021
Meetings: 3 |
|
|
Chair |
Other
Members |
|
|
|
|
|
Nabil Y.
Sakkab |
John T.
Casteen III |
R. Matt
Davis |
W. Leo
Kiely III |
Ellen R.
Strahlman |
|
|
|
Marjorie M.
Connelly |
Debra J.
Kelly-Ennis |
Virginia E.
Shanks |
|
|
|
Primary responsibilities
include:
■ Assisting
our Board in its oversight of the strategic goals and objectives of
our subsidiaries’ innovation and marketing
strategies, consumer/market understanding and brand plans,
technological initiatives and research, development and engineering programs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominating,
Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility
Committee |
2021
Meetings: 7 |
|
|
Chair |
Other
Members |
|
|
|
|
|
Debra J.
Kelly-Ennis |
Marjorie
M. Connelly |
Dinyar
S. Devitre |
George
Muñoz |
Ellen R.
Strahlman |
|
|
|
R. Matt
Davis |
Kathryn B.
McQuade |
Nabil Y.
Sakkab |
|
|
|
Primary responsibilities
include:
■ Identifying
individuals qualified to become directors consistent with the
criteria established by our Board and described
in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and recommending to our
Board a slate of nominees for election at
each annual meeting of shareholders.
■ Making
recommendations to our Board concerning the appropriate size,
function, needs and composition of ourBoard and
its Committees.
■ Reviewing
non-employee director compensation and recommending any changes in
compensation to our Board.
■ Advising
our Board on corporate governance matters.
■ Overseeing
the annual Board and Committee self-evaluation process.
■ Providing
oversight of our public affairs, corporate reputation and
environmental and social responsibility strategies.
The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility
Committee consists entirely of non-management directors all of whom our Board has determined are independent
within the meaning of the listing standards of the NYSE.
|
|
Altria Group, Inc. –
Proxy Statement 11
Table of
Contents
BOARD AND GOVERNANCE
MATTERS
Board Meetings and
Attendance

Board
Effectiveness
We
believe our Board practices strengthen the effectiveness of our
Board, and we assess them annually to identify opportunities for
improvement.
Board and Committee
Self-Evaluations
Our Board
assesses annually its effectiveness and that of its Committees in
discharging their responsibilities. The Nominating, Corporate
Governance and Social Responsibility Committee oversees the
evaluation process.
Format |
Topics |
Presentation of Findings |
The
Nominating, Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility Committee
determines the format of the
evaluations, which may include
interviews conducted by the
Chair, interviews conducted by the Chair of the Nominating, Corporate
Governance and Social
Responsibility Committee,
interviews conducted by an independent third party or written
surveys. |
Self-evaluation
topics generally include:
■ Board
composition and structure
■ Meeting
topics and process
■ Information
flow
■ Board oversight of risk
management and strategic
planning
■ Succession
planning
■ Access
to management
|
The
results of the self-evaluations are reported to our Board, which
discusses the results to identify opportunities to enhance
effectiveness. |
Feedback Incorporated
Our
Board implements enhancements and other modifications, as
appropriate, identified during the self-evaluations.
Examples
of actions our Board has taken in recent years in response to the
annual self-evaluation process include enhanced information flow,
such as additional pre-meeting materials and providing access to
Committee materials for all directors, and reformatting meetings to
enhance discussion on corporate strategy and other key
issues.
|
12 www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
BOARD AND GOVERNANCE
MATTERS
Board Succession
Planning
The
Nominating, Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility
Committee has the primary responsibility for developing a
succession plan for our Board. Using tools such as the annual Board
and Committee self-evaluations and our Board retirement guidelines,
it periodically reviews our Board composition and identifies the
appropriate mix of experiences, skills, attributes and tenure for
our Board as a whole in light of our strategies and needs with the
objective of recommending a group of directors that can best
continue our success and act in the best interests of Altria and
our shareholders. The Committee and our Board are committed to
developing a diverse pool of potential candidates for future Board
service consideration. See “Process for Nominating Directors” and
“Board Skills and Experience and Demographic Backgrounds” on pages
1 and 2, respectively, for a further discussion of our Board
composition.
Board Retirement
Guidelines
Our Board
has adopted retirement guidelines that require a director who will
have attained the age of 75 as of the date of the next annual
meeting to tender his or her written resignation to our Board at
least six months prior to such annual meeting. If our Board
determines that continued service by the director is in the best
interests of Altria and our shareholders, our Board has the
discretion not to accept the resignation. As required under the
retirement guidelines, Messrs. Casteen, Devitre, Kiely and Sakkab
tendered their respective resignations to our Board in October
2021. We note that in October 2020, Mr. Casteen notified us of his
intention to retire from our Board upon the completion of his
then-current term. Following the passing of our former Chair in
April 2021, Mr. Casteen agreed to stand for election to our Board
at the 2021 Annual Meeting. After due consideration, our Board
accepted Mr. Casteen’s resignation in October 2021, but did not
accept the resignations of Messrs. Devitre, Kiely and Sakkab. In
making the decision not to accept the resignations of these
directors, our Board considered several factors, including their
contributions, experience and qualifications, as well as Board
continuity, and determined that their continued service is in the
best interests of Altria and our shareholders. Subsequently, in
February 2022, Mr. Devitre notified Altria of his decision to
retire from our Board following the completion of his current
term.
Director Education
and Engagement
Upon
election to our Board, new directors participate in a multi-day
comprehensive on-boarding process. They are introduced to the
operational aspects of our businesses, our strategies, key issues
facing Altria and our Board governance processes. New directors
meet individually with various members of management and visit key
facilities, as appropriate, as part of the on-boarding
program.
We make
available to our directors third-party director education programs
that provide additional perspective on various topics. We provide a
list of programs, updated regularly, to our directors. They may
also choose self-selected educational programs. We also
periodically invite outside experts to meet with our Board to
review matters relevant to corporate directors, including corporate
governance.
Governance
Guidelines, Policies and Codes
Our Board
has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines. In addition, our Board
has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors
(“Director Code”) and a policy with regard to reviewing certain
transactions in which we are a participant and an officer, director
or nominee for director has had or may have a direct or indirect
material interest (see “Related Person Transactions and Code of
Conduct” on page 69 for further information). These documents are
available on our website at https:// www.altria.com/governance. Our
Board has also adopted the Altria Code of Conduct (“Code of
Conduct”) that applies to all our employees, including our
principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal
accounting officer or controller, and persons performing similar
functions. The Code of Conduct is available on our website at
https://www.altria.com/codeofconduct.
Director
Compensation
Compensation
Philosophy
Our
philosophy is to provide competitive compensation necessary to
attract and retain high-quality non-employee directors and
appropriately compensate them for the time, expertise and effort
required to serve as a director of a large publicly traded company
that operates in a dynamic, highly regulated industry. Our Board
believes that a substantial portion of director compensation should
consist of equity-based compensation, coupled with robust stock
ownership guidelines, to assist in aligning directors’ interests
with the interests of shareholders. Directors who are employees of
Altria receive no additional compensation for service as a
director.
Altria Group, Inc. –
Proxy Statement 13
Table of
Contents
BOARD AND GOVERNANCE
MATTERS
Director Compensation
Review
The
Nominating, Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility
Committee annually reviews and periodically recommends updates to
the director compensation program to our Board for approval. During
these reviews, the Committee considers our director compensation
philosophy, the competitiveness of director compensation based on
an independent benchmarking study (taking into account director
compensation at our Compensation Survey Group (“CSG”) described
under “Benchmarking” beginning on page 48 and at other large public
companies) and current market practices. The Committee also
considers the appropriateness of the form, mix and amount of
director compensation. The Committee then makes a recommendation to
our Board concerning such compensation with a view toward
attracting and retaining qualified directors. After reviewing
compensation in January 2021, the Committee determined, and our
Board agreed, to leave our director compensation
unchanged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our directors’ annual stock awards have not increased since 2014,
and annual cash retainers have not increased since 2016. The
additional Board Chair stock award and cash retainer began in 2020
upon the separation of the roles of Chair and CEO and have remained
the same since then. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of
Compensation
The
following chart presents the 2021 components of compensation for
our non-employee directors:
Annual Stock Award |
|
Annual Cash Retainers |
|
|
|
Board Member
(1) |
$175,000 |
|
Board Member
(2) |
$110,000 |
Board Chair
(3) |
$150,000 |
|
Board Chair
(3) |
$150,000 |
|
|
|
Committees |
Chair |
Member (4) |

|
|
■ Audit
■ Compensation
and Talent Development
|
$25,000 |
$5,000 |
|
■ Finance
■ Innovation
■ Nominating, Corporate
Governance and Social Responsibility
|
$15,000 |
(1) |
The annual full value stock award is in the form of
fully vested shares of Altria common stock. |
(2) |
Paid in quarterly installments. |
(3) |
The Board Chair also receives the annual Board
member stock award, the annual Board member cash retainer and the
annual Committee member cash retainers for the Committees on which
he or she serves. |
(4) |
Committee Chairs also receive the Committee member
annual cash retainer. |
(5) |
These percentages are averages and do not include the annual
Board Chair stock award or annual Board Chair cash
retainer. |
Deferred Fee
Plan
A
non-employee director may elect to defer all or part of the award
of shares of common stock and all or part of his or her cash
retainers. Pursuant to the Deferred Fee Plan for Non-Employee
Directors (“Deferred Fee Plan”), deferred retainers are credited to
an unfunded bookkeeping account and may be “invested” in various
“investment choices,” including an Altria common stock equivalent
account. These “investment choices” parallel the investment options
offered under the Deferred Profit-Sharing Plan for Salaried
Employees and determine the “earnings” that are credited for
bookkeeping purposes to a non-employee director’s account. The
non-employee director will receive deferred awards of common stock
and cash distributions of deferred retainers either prior to or
following termination of service from our Board, as elected by the
non-employee director.
14 www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
BOARD AND GOVERNANCE
MATTERS
Matching Gift
Program
Non-employee directors
are eligible to participate in our Matching Gift Program. This
program is available to all employees and non-employee directors.
We match eligible donations of a minimum of $25 up to $30,000 per
year per employee or non-employee director on a dollar-for-dollar
basis to eligible non-profit organizations. In 2021, the following
non-employee directors participated in this program: Mr. Casteen,
Ms. Connelly, Mr. Davis, Mr. Devitre, Ms. Kelly-Ennis, Mr. Kiely,
Ms. McQuade, Mr. Muñoz, Mr. Newman, Dr. Sakkab and Ms. Shanks. The
aggregate amount of matching payments for these directors in 2021
was $229,606.
Other
In
addition to cash payments, stock awards and matching gifts,
non-employee directors are covered under our Business Travel
Accident Insurance Plan, which is available generally to all
employees.
The
following table presents the compensation received by the
non-employee directors for service as directors in fiscal year
2021.
Non-Employee Director
Compensation Table
Name |
|
Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash
($) |
|
Stock
Awards
($) (5) |
|
All
Other
Compensation
($) (6) |
|
Total
($) |
John T.
Casteen III |
|
125,000 |
|
|
175,024 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
302,024 |
Marjorie
M. Connelly (1) |
|
19,728 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
24,106 |
|
|
43,834 |
R.
Matt Davis (1) |
|
19,728 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
19,000 |
|
|
38,728 |
Dinyar S.
Devitre |
|
140,000 |
|
|
175,024 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
345,024 |
Thomas
F. Farrell II (2) |
|
27,500 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
27,500 |
Debra J.
Kelly-Ennis |
|
140,000 |
|
|
175,024 |
|
|
|
13,500 |
|
|
328,524 |
W. Leo
Kiely III |
|
150,000 |
|
|
175,024 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
355,024 |
Kathryn
B. McQuade (3) |
|
270,000 |
|
|
325,015 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
625,015 |
George
Muñoz |
|
150,000 |
|
|
175,024 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
355,024 |
Mark
E. Newman (4) |
|
125,000 |
|
|
175,024 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
330,024 |
Nabil Y.
Sakkab |
|
140,000 |
|
|
175,024 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
316,024 |
Virginia
E. Shanks |
|
125,000 |
|
|
175,024 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
320,024 |
Ellen R.
Strahlman |
|
125,000 |
|
|
175,024 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
300,024 |
(1) |
Ms.
Connelly and Mr. Davis became directors effective October 27,
2021. |
(2) |
Mr.
Farrell passed away on April 2, 2021. |
(3) |
Amounts
include (a) annual Board member cash retainer, Committee member
cash retainers and Board member stock award and (b) Board Chair
cash retainer and stock award. |
(4) |
Mr.
Newman retired from service on our Board effective January 1,
2022. |
(5) |
Pursuant
to the 2015 Stock Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the
“2015 Non-Employee Directors Plan”), on May 20, 2021, each
non-employee director received 3,517 shares of Altria common stock
with an aggregate grant date fair market value of $175,024, and Ms.
McQuade received an additional 3,014 shares of Altria common stock
with an aggregate grant date fair market value of $149,992 as Board
Chair. The dollar value for the Board member stock award is
slightly higher than $175,000 because the grant is made in whole
shares. Ms. McQuade’s combined Board member stock award and Board
Chair stock award was slightly higher than $325,000 because the
grant is made in whole shares. The fair market value of all shares
awarded of $49.765 per share was based on the average of the high
and low trading prices of Altria common stock on May 20,
2021. |
(6) |
All
Other Compensation consists of matching gifts paid in 2021 under
our Matching Gift Program. |
Altria Group, Inc. –
Proxy Statement 15
Table of
Contents
BOARD AND GOVERNANCE
MATTERS
Stock Ownership
Guidelines for Non-Employee Directors and Prohibition on Hedging
and Pledging
Our Board
believes that stock ownership guidelines further align the
interests of our Board with those of our shareholders. Our
non-employee directors are expected to hold shares of our common
stock in an amount equal to the lesser of five times the
then-current annual Board member cash retainer or 26,000 shares.
Non-employee directors are expected to reach this ownership level
within five years of being elected to our Board and to hold the
requisite number of shares until retirement. The ownership
guidelines for non-employee directors may be satisfied with all
beneficially owned shares, including deferred shares and share
equivalents. As of December 31, 2021, all our non-employee
directors who had served on our Board for five or more years held a
sufficient number of shares to satisfy these guidelines.
Our
non-employee directors are not permitted to engage in hedging or
pledging activities with respect to our stock. A description of
Altria’s hedging and pledging policies is included under
“Prohibition on Hedging and Pledging” on page 70.
16 www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
BOARD AND GOVERNANCE
MATTERS
|
Proposal
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Election of
Directors |
|
|
|
|
Our
Board recommends a vote
FOR each
nominee. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We
propose that the 12 individuals named below, 11 of whom our Board
has affirmatively determined to be independent, be elected as
directors to hold office until the next annual meeting of
shareholders and until their successors have been elected and
qualified, subject to their earlier death, resignation or removal.
The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility
Committee has recommended to our Board, and our Board has approved,
the individuals named below.
We
provide in the biographies below information on each nominee. The
Committee and our Board believe that these nominees individually
and collectively provide our Board with an impressive breadth of
experiences, attributes, qualifications and skills.
Although it is not anticipated that any of the individuals named
below will be unable or unwilling to stand for election, in the
event of such an occurrence, a proxy may be voted for a substitute
designated by our Board. In lieu of designating a substitute, our
Board may reduce the number of directors.
Our Board recommends a vote
FOR each of the nominees for election as
directors. |
2022 Director
Nominee Biographies and Qualifications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position, Principal
Occupation and Professional Experience:
Chief Financial
Officer, Greater Toronto Airports Authority
■ Serves as Chief
Financial Officer of Greater Toronto Airports Authority, operator
of Toronto Pearson International Airport, Canada’s largest airport,
since 2017.
■ Served as
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Business
Development of Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment Ltd.
(“Maple Leaf Sports”), owner of the Toronto Maple Leafs, Toronto
Raptors, Toronto FC and the Air Canada Centre, from 2004 through
2016. Mr. Clarke spent 26 years at Maple Leaf Sports in key
strategic planning and financial leadership positions.
Other Current Public Directorships:
None.
Prior Public Company Directorships:
None.
Other Directorships, Trusteeships and
Memberships:
AGF Management Limited (TSX:AGF.B); First Capital Real Estate
Investment Trust (TSX:FCR.UN); Canadian Olympic Committee.
Director Qualifications:
The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility
Committee believes that Mr. Clarke’s significant financial,
accounting, strategic planning, business operations and risk
management experience provide clear support for his nomination for
election to our Board.
|
|

Ian
L.T. Clarke
Age: 61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altria
Group, Inc. – Proxy
Statement 17
Table of
Contents
BOARD AND GOVERNANCE
MATTERS
|
|
|
|
|
|

Marjorie M. Connelly
Age: 60
Director Since: October 2021
Board Committees:
■ Audit
■ Innovation
■ Nominating, Corporate
Governance and Social Responsibility
|
|
|
Position, Principal Occupation and Professional
Experience:
Retired Chief
Operating Officer, Convergys Corporation
■ Served as
Chief Operating Officer of Convergys Corporation (now Concentrix
Corporation), a publicly traded global leader in customer
management, from 2014 to 2017.
■ Served as
Global Chief Operating Officer at Barclaycard from 2009 to
2011.
■ From 2006
to 2008, served as Chief Operating Officer of Wachovia
Securities.
■ Held a
variety of executive positions at Capital One Financial
Corporation, including Executive Vice President, Head of
Infrastructure for U.S. credit card operations and interim Chief
Information Officer, from 1994 to 2006.
Other Current Public Directorships:
PRA Group, Inc.
Prior Public Company Directorships:
None.
Other Directorships, Trusteeships and
Memberships:
MissionOG (Advisor); The Women’s
Initiative; State Council of Higher Education for Virginia.
Director Qualifications:
The Nominating, Corporate Governance and
Social Responsibility Committee believes that Ms. Connelly’s
extensive operational executive management experience at large
publicly held consumer-oriented companies, together with her
financial acumen and experience, information technology experience,
general business knowledge and public company board experience,
provide clear support for her nomination for election to our
Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

R. Matt Davis
Age: 57
Director Since: October 2021
Board Committees:
■ Finance
■ Innovation
■ Nominating, Corporate
Governance and Social Responsibility
|
|
|
Position, Principal Occupation and Professional
Experience:
President,
Driftwood Leadership, LLC and Retired President, North America, and
Senior Vice President, Global Corporate Affairs, Dow Inc.
■ Serves as
President of Driftwood Leadership, LLC, a leadership training and
consulting firm, since 2019.
■ Served as
President, North America, and Senior Vice President, Global
Corporate Affairs of Dow Inc. (“Dow”), an innovative materials
science company, from 2016 to 2019.
■ Held a variety of
executive corporate affairs, communications and leadership roles
across the Dow organization, from 1987 to 2016.
Other Current Public Directorships:
None.
Prior Public Company Directorships:
None.
Other Directorships, Trusteeships and
Memberships:
World Freerunning Parkour Federation;
Saratoga WarHorse Foundation, Inc.; Michigan State University,
College of Communications Arts & Sciences Alumni Board;
After The Impact Fund, Inc.
Director Qualifications:
The Nominating, Corporate Governance and
Social Responsibility Committee believes that Mr. Davis’ extensive
public policy, business and executive leadership experiences in a
highly regulated industry (including his role leading Dow’s largest
operating division) provide clear support for his nomination for
election to our Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
BOARD AND GOVERNANCE MATTERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position, Principal Occupation and Professional
Experience:
Chief Executive
Officer, Altria Group, Inc.
■ Serves as Chief
Executive Officer of Altria Group, Inc. since April 2020.
■ Served as Vice
Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of Altria from May 2018 to
April 2020.
■ Served as
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Altria from
March 2015 through May 2018.
■ Held numerous
other senior leadership roles since joining the Altria family of
companies in 1994.
Other Current Public Directorships:
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV.
Prior Public Company Directorships:
None.
Other Directorships, Trusteeships and
Memberships:
Catalyst Inc.
Director
Qualifications:
The Nominating, Corporate Governance and
Social Responsibility Committee believes that Mr. Gifford’s role as
Altria’s CEO and his significant knowledge and understanding of
Altria, our businesses and the external environment in which our
businesses operate, together with his significant industry
knowledge, financial expertise and leadership experiences, provide
clear support for his nomination for election to our Board.
|
|

William F. Gifford, Jr.
Age: 51
Director Since: May
2020
Chief Executive
Officer
Board
Committees:
■ Executive Committee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position, Principal Occupation and Professional
Experience:
Retired President
and Chief Executive Officer, Diageo Canada, Inc.
■ Served as
President and Chief Executive Officer of Diageo Canada, Inc., a
subsidiary of Diageo plc, a global spirits, wine and beer company,
from 2008 to June 2012.
■ Served as Chief
Marketing Officer for Diageo North America, Inc., a subsidiary of
Diageo plc, from 2005 to 2008.
■ Held marketing,
sales and general management positions with RJR/Nabisco, Inc., The
Coca-Cola Company, General Motors Corporation and Grand
Metropolitan PLC.
Other Current Public Directorships:
TFI International Inc.
Prior Public Company Directorships:
Carnival Corporation & plc
(2012 to January 2020); PulteGroup, Inc. (1997 to September 2016);
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (2013 to October 2015).
Other Directorships, Trusteeships and
Memberships:
Dress for Success Worldwide (Director
Emeritus); Trivium Packaging B.V.
Director Qualifications:
The Nominating, Corporate Governance and
Social Responsibility Committee believes that Ms. Kelly-Ennis’s
leadership experiences, particularly her executive positions with
several large, consumer-focused companies in multiple industries,
and her significant marketing, innovation, sales and distribution
experience at large publicly held companies, including companies in
the consumer packaged goods industry, provide clear support for her
nomination for election to our Board.
|
|

Debra J. Kelly-Ennis
Age: 65
Director Since: 2013
Board Committees:
■ Audit
■ Executive
■ Innovation
■ Nominating,
Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility (Chair)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altria Group, Inc. –
Proxy Statement 19
Table of
Contents
BOARD AND GOVERNANCE MATTERS
|
|
|
|
|
|

W.
Leo Kiely III
Age: 75
Director Since:
2011
Board Committees:
■ Compensation and
Talent Development (Chair)
■ Executive
■ Finance
■ Innovation
|
|
|
Position, Principal Occupation and Professional
Experience:
Retired Chief
Executive Officer, MillerCoors LLC
■ Retired as
Chief Executive Officer of MillerCoors LLC, a joint venture
combining the U.S. and Puerto Rico operations of SABMiller plc and
Molson Coors Brewing Company, in July 2011, a position he had held
since July 2009.
■ Served as
President and Chief Executive Officer of Molson Coors Brewing
Company from February 2005 through July 2009.
■ Held a
variety of executive positions at Coors Brewing Company, including
Chief Executive Officer, from March 1993 to March 2005.
■ Held
executive positions with Frito-Lay, Inc., a subsidiary of PepsiCo,
Inc., and Ventura Coastal Corporation, a division of Seven Up Inc.,
before joining Coors Brewing Company.
Other Current Public Directorships:
None.
Prior Public Company Directorships:
HC Government Realty Trust, Inc. (2016
to March 2019); Medpro Safety Products, Inc. (2009 to March
2014).
Other Directorships, Trusteeships and
Memberships:
Riptide Waters, LLC. Previously served
on the boards of The Denver Center for the Performing Arts and the
Helen G. Bonfils Foundation.
Director Qualifications:
The Nominating,
Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility Committee believes
that Mr. Kiely’s extensive business, administrative and leadership
experiences, particularly his various executive positions,
including the role of chief executive officer, in the consumer
packaged goods industry, provide clear support for his nomination
for election to our Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Kathryn B. McQuade
Age: 65
Director Since:
2012
Chair of the
Board
Board Committees:
■ Audit
■ Compensation and
Talent Development
■ Executive
(Chair)
■ Nominating,
Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility
|
|
|
Position, Principal Occupation and Professional
Experience:
Retired Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Canadian Pacific
Railway Limited
■ Served as Senior
Advisor of Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (“Canadian Pacific”), a
transcontinental railway in Canada and the United States, from
November 2012 to May 2013, after previously serving as Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Canadian Pacific from
September 2008 until her retirement in November 2012.
■ Served as
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Canadian
Pacific from June 2007 to September 2008.
■ Served as
Executive Vice President – Planning and Chief Information Officer
at Norfolk Southern Corporation where she spent 27 years in key
information technology, strategic planning and finance leadership
positions prior to joining Canadian Pacific.
Other Current Public Directorships:
None.
Prior Public Company Directorships:
None.
Other Directorships, Trusteeships and
Memberships:
Previously served on the boards of
TransAlta Renewables Inc. (TSX: RNW) and The College of
William & Mary Foundation.
Director Qualifications:
The Nominating, Corporate Governance and
Social Responsibility Committee believes that Ms. McQuade’s
significant financial and accounting expertise, particularly her
experience as a public company chief financial officer, her
information technology experience, her general business knowledge
and her management experience in a regulated industry, provide
clear support for her nomination for election to our Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
BOARD AND GOVERNANCE MATTERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position, Principal Occupation and Professional
Experience:
Principal, Muñoz Investment Banking Group, LLC, and
Partner, Tobin & Muñoz
■ Serves
as a principal of Muñoz Investment Banking Group, LLC.
■ Serves
as a partner in the law firm of Tobin & Muñoz.
■ Served
as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Overseas Private
Investment Corporation from 1997 to January 2001.
■ Served as Chief
Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary of the United States
Treasury Department from 1993 to 1997.
Other Current Public Directorships:
Marriott International, Inc.; Laureate Education, Inc., BRC
Inc.
Prior Public Company Directorships:
Anixter International, Inc. (2004 to June 2020); Esmark
Incorporated (2007 to August 2008); Archipelago Holdings, Inc.
(2004 to March 2006).
Other Directorships, Trusteeships and Memberships:
National Geographic Society; Direct Edge, Inc.
Director Qualifications:
The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Social
Responsibility Committee believes that Mr. Muñoz’s
accounting, financial, legal and public policy expertise, along
with his background in international business and his significant
professional, administrative and leadership experiences in both the
private and public sectors, provide clear support for his
nomination for election to our Board.
|
|

George
Muñoz
Age:
70
Director
Since: 2004
Board
Committees:
■ Audit
(Chair)
■ Executive
■ Finance
■ Nominating,
Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position, Principal Occupation and Professional
Experience:
Retired Senior Vice President, Corporate Research and
Development, The Procter & Gamble Company
■ Retired
as Senior Vice President, Corporate Research and Development of the
Proctor & Gamble Company, a global leader in consumer
goods, in November 2007.
■ Held
a variety of positions at The Procter & Gamble Company
beginning in 1974.
Other Current Public Directorships:
None.
Prior Public Company Directorships:
None.
Other Directorships, Trusteeships and Memberships:
Several privately held companies. Previously served on the
boards of Deinove (Euronext Growth Paris: ALDEI); Givaudan SA (SWX:
GIVN); and Pharnext (Euronext Growth Paris: ALPHA).
Director Qualifications:
The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Social
Responsibility Committee believes that Dr. Sakkab’s innovation
expertise in the consumer packaged goods industry and his extensive
overall business and global product development and
commercialization knowledge, including knowledge of regulated
products, provide clear support for his nomination for election to
our Board.
|
|

Nabil Y.
Sakkab
Age:
74
Director
Since: 2008
Board Committees:
■ Executive
■ Finance
■ Innovation
(Chair)
■ Nominating, Corporate
Governance and Social Responsibility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altria
Group, Inc. – Proxy Statement 21
Table of
Contents
BOARD AND
GOVERNANCE MATTERS
|
|
|
|
|
|

Virginia
E. Shanks
Age:
61
Director
Since: 2017
Board
Committees:
■ Audit
■ Compensation
and Talent Development
■ Innovation
|
|
|
Position, Principal Occupation and Professional
Experience:
Retired Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative
Officer, Pinnacle Entertainment,
Inc.
■ Served
as Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of
Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. (“Pinnacle”), a casino entertainment
company, from July 2013 until October 2018 when Pinnacle merged
with Penn National Gaming, Inc. (“Penn National”), also a casino
entertainment company.
■ Served
as Strategic Advisor for Penn National through December 2019 after
the merger.
■ Served
as Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer of Pinnacle
from October 2010 to June 2013.
■ Served
as Chief Marketing Officer for Multimedia Games Inc. from 2008 to
2010 prior to joining Pinnacle.
■ Held
senior executive positions for more than 25 years at the property,
division and corporate levels of Caesars Entertainment Corp.,
including Senior Vice President of Brand Management, prior to
2008.
Other Current Public Directorships:
EPR Properties; Scientific Games Corporation.
Prior Public Company Directorships:
None.
Other Directorships, Trusteeships and Memberships:
None.
Director Qualifications:
The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Social
Responsibility Committee believes that Ms. Shanks’s significant
regulated industry and consumer-oriented marketing expertise,
particularly her extensive background in brand positioning and
digital and database marketing, as well as her experience in
information technology and cybersecurity, provide clear support for
her nomination for election to our Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Ellen
R. Strahlman
Age:
64
Director
Since:
November
2020
Board
Committees:
■ Audit
■ Innovation
■ Nominating,
Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility
|
|
|
Position, Principal Occupation and Professional
Experience:
Retired Executive Vice President, Research &
Development and Chief Medical Officer, Becton, Dickinson and
Company
■ Served
as Executive Vice President, Research & Development and
Chief Medical Officer of Becton, Dickinson and Company, a leading
global medical technology company, from April 2013 until her
retirement in January 2018.
■ Served
as a Senior Advisor to the CEO at GlaxoSmithKline from April 2012
through March 2013 after previously serving as the Senior Vice
President and Chief Medical Officer from April 2008 through March
2012.
■ Held
senior executive leadership roles in global product development and
commercialization, medical affairs and business development at
leading pharmaceutical and medical technology companies including
Pfizer, Inc., Novartis AG, Virogen Limited, Bausch & Lomb,
Inc. and Merck & Co., Inc. prior to 2008.
Other Current Public Directorships:
None.
Prior Public Company Directorships:
None.
Other Directorships, Trusteeships and Memberships:
Previously served on the boards of Syncona Limited (LSE:
SYNC) and Syncona Partners LLP.
Director Qualifications:
The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Social
Responsibility Committee believes that Dr. Strahlman’s significant
experience in innovation, global product development and
commercialization in regulated industries, as well as her medical
background and experience in biosciences, provide clear support for
her nomination for election to our Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
BOARD AND
GOVERNANCE MATTERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position, Principal Occupation and Professional
Experience:
Retired Executive Chairman, Forbes Bros. Holdings,
Ltd.
■ Served
as U.S. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Forbes Bros.
Holdings, Ltd., an energy infrastructure construction company, from
2017 to 2019, and as Executive Chairman from 2019 to
2021.
■ Served
as Chief Executive Officer of Yzaguirre Group, LLC, a business and
public affairs strategic advisory firm, from 2006 to
2017.
■ Served
as Chairman of Isolux Ingenieria USA, LLC, the U.S. operation and
wholly owned subsidiary of Isolux Corsan S.A., a Spanish
engineering, procurement and construction company, from 2011 to
2013, having previously served as Chief Executive Officer from 2010
to 2011.
■ Served as
President of Hunt-Mexico, Inc., an investor in energy, real estate
and private equity opportunities, and as President of Hunt
Resources, Inc., an investor in energy production and
transportation opportunities, from 2002 to 2006.
Other Current Public Directorships:
Aris Water Solutions, Inc.; Luther Burbank
Corporation.
Prior Public Company Directorships:
BBVA USA Bancshares, Inc. (2009 to 2021); Texas Regional
Bancshares, Inc. (2000 to 2006).
Other Directorships, Trusteeships and Memberships:
Latino Corporate Directors Association. Previously served on
the boards of BBVA USA Bank and Texas State Bank.
Director Qualifications:
The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Social
Responsibility Committee believes that Mr. Yzaguirre’s executive
leadership experience, financial acumen, domestic and international
business and public affairs experience (including with highly
regulated industries) and public company board experience, provide
clear support for his nomination for election to our
Board.
|
|

M. Max
Yzaguirre
Age:
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altria
Group, Inc. – Proxy Statement 23
Table of
Contents
Audit Committee Matters
Annual Evaluation and
Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP (“PricewaterhouseCoopers”) has been our independent registered
public accounting firm since 1998. Prior to 1998, our independent
registered public accounting firm was Coopers & Lybrand
L.L.P. (until its merger with Price Waterhouse LLP in 1998). In
addition to assuring the rotation of the lead audit partner every
five years as required by law, the Audit Committee is responsible
for selecting, reviewing and evaluating the lead partner and senior
members of the audit engagement team and considers whether, in
order to assure continuing auditor independence, there should be a
rotation of the firm.
In selecting
PricewaterhouseCoopers as our independent registered public
accounting firm, the Audit Committee conducted its annual
evaluation of the firm. This evaluation considers a number of
factors in deciding whether to re-engage PricewaterhouseCoopers,
including technical competence, knowledge of our industry and
Altria, quality of services, reputation and communications with
management and the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee also
evaluates the firm’s independence program and quality control
procedures, the results of Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (“PCAOB”) and peer reviews of the firm’s quality controls and
the appropriateness of the firm’s fees. The Audit Committee also
considers PricewaterhouseCoopers’s tenure and, while the Audit
Committee periodically considers firm rotation, it continues to
believe that extended tenure results in higher quality audit work
with greater operational efficiencies through the leveraging of
PricewaterhouseCoopers’s deep institutional knowledge of our
operations and businesses, accounting policies and practices, and
internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee is
also mindful of the potential impacts of selecting a different
firm, including the significant time commitment and expense
inherent in on-boarding a new independent registered public
accounting firm.
The Audit Committee and
our Board believe that the continued retention of
PricewaterhouseCoopers to serve as our independent registered
public accounting firm is in the best interests of Altria and our
shareholders.
Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm’s Fees
The Audit Committee has
the sole authority to approve all engagement fees and terms
associated with the retention of PricewaterhouseCoopers. As noted
in the Audit Committee Report on page 25, the Audit Committee
pre-approved all fees associated with the services that the firm
provided in 2021.
Aggregate fees,
including out-of-pocket expenses, for professional services
rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2021 and 2020 were comprised of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
2021
($) |
|
2020
($) |
Audit Fees
(1) |
|
5,775 |
|
6,761 |
Audit-Related Fees
(2) |
|
905 |
|
745 |
Tax Fees
(3) |
|
800 |
|
1,235 |
All Other
Fees (4) |
|
5 |
|
5 |
TOTAL |
|
7,485 |
|
8,746 |
(1) |
Fees
and expenses for (a) the audit of our consolidated financial
statements and internal control over financial reporting, including
statutory audits of the financial statements of our subsidiaries,
(b) reviews of our unaudited condensed consolidated interim
financial statements and (c) reviews of documents filed with the
SEC. |
(2) |
Fees
and expenses for audit-related services, which include certain
employee benefit plan audits, accounting consultations and
procedures relating to various other audit and special
reports. |
(3) |
Fees
and expenses for U.S. and foreign tax compliance and planning, and
consultation and advice on tax examinations. |
(4) |
Other
fees were related to licenses for technical accounting
tools. |
24 www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS
Pre-Approval
Policy
The Audit Committee’s
policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit
services provided by the independent registered public accounting
firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related
services, tax services and other services. Pre-approval is detailed
as to the particular service or category of service and is subject
to a specific budget. The Audit Committee requires the independent
registered public accounting firm and management to report
periodically on the actual fees charged for each category of
service.
During the year, it may
become necessary to engage the independent registered public
accounting firm for additional services not contemplated in the
original pre-approval. In those instances, the Audit Committee
requires specific pre-approval before engaging the independent
registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has
delegated pre-approval authority to the Chair of the Audit
Committee for those instances when pre-approval is needed prior to
a scheduled Audit Committee meeting. The Chair of the Audit
Committee must report on such approvals at the next scheduled Audit
Committee meeting.
Audit Committee Report for
the Year Ended December 31, 2021
Management has the
primary responsibility for Altria’s financial statements and the
reporting process, including the systems of internal accounting
control. The Audit Committee monitors Altria’s financial reporting
processes and systems of internal accounting control, the
independence and the performance of PricewaterhouseCoopers and the
performance of the internal auditors.
The Audit Committee has
received representations from management that Altria’s consolidated
financial statements were prepared in accordance with GAAP and that
Altria maintained effective internal control over financial
reporting, and the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the
consolidated financial statements with management and
PricewaterhouseCoopers. The Audit Committee has discussed with
PricewaterhouseCoopers its evaluation of the accounting principles,
practices and judgments applied by management, and the Audit
Committee has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers the matters
required to be discussed by applicable standards adopted by the
PCAOB.
The Audit Committee has
received from PricewaterhouseCoopers written disclosures and a
letter required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding
PricewaterhouseCoopers’s communications with the Audit Committee
concerning independence and has discussed with
PricewaterhouseCoopers its independence from Altria and our
management. The Audit Committee pre-approved all fiscal year 2021
audit and permissible non-audit services provided by
PricewaterhouseCoopers and the fees for those services included on
page 24. As part of this process, the Audit Committee reviewed
non-audit services and fees to assure compliance with regulations
prohibiting the independent registered public accounting firm from
performing specified services that might impair its
independence.
The Audit Committee
discussed with Altria’s internal auditors and
PricewaterhouseCoopers the overall scope of and plans for their
respective audits. The Audit Committee has met with the internal
auditors and PricewaterhouseCoopers, separately and together, with
and without management present, to discuss Altria’s financial
reporting processes and internal control over financial reporting.
The Audit Committee has reviewed significant audit findings
prepared by PricewaterhouseCoopers and those prepared by the
internal auditors, together with management’s responses.
Based on the reviews and
discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to
our Board the inclusion of the audited consolidated financial
statements in Altria’s 2021 Form 10-K.
Audit
Committee:
George Muñoz, Chair
John T. Casteen III
Marjorie M. Connelly
Debra J. Kelly-Ennis
Kathryn B. McQuade
Virginia E. Shanks
Ellen R.
Strahlman
Altria Group, Inc. –
Proxy Statement 25
Table of
Contents
AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS
|
Proposal
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratification of the
Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm |
|
|
|
|
Our
Board recommends a vote
FOR ratification
of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
reflected in the Audit Committee Charter, the Audit Committee is
directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention
and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm
retained to audit our consolidated financial statements. The Audit
Committee has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers as our independent
registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2022 and has directed that management submit such
selection to shareholders for ratification at the 2022 Annual
Meeting.
Shareholder ratification
of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers as our independent
registered public accounting firm is not required by our By-Laws or
otherwise. However, we are submitting the selection of
PricewaterhouseCoopers to shareholders for ratification as a matter
of good corporate governance. If our shareholders fail to ratify
the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether to
retain PricewaterhouseCoopers. Even if the selection is ratified,
the Audit Committee in its discretion may appoint a different
independent registered public accounting firm at any time during
the year if it is determined that such a change would be in the
best interests of Altria and our shareholders.
We expect
representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers will be present at the
meeting. The representatives will have an opportunity to make a
statement if they so desire and be available to respond to
appropriate questions.
Our
Board recommends a vote
FOR ratification
of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers. |
26 www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
Executive Compensation – Table of
Contents
Altria Group, Inc. –
Proxy Statement 27
Table of
Contents
Executive
Compensation
Compensation and Talent Development
Committee Report
for the Year Ended December 31, 2021 |
|
The
Compensation and Talent Development Committee has reviewed
and discussed the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section
of this Proxy Statement with management.
Based on its review and discussions with
management, the Compensation and Talent Development
Committee recommended to our Board that the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.
Compensation and
Talent Development Committee:
W.
Leo Kiely III, Chair
John T. Casteen III
Dinyar S. Devitre
Kathryn B. McQuade
Virginia E.
Shanks
|
Compensation Discussion and
Analysis
Introduction
In this section, we
provide a detailed description of our executive compensation
program, with a focus on decisions by the Compensation and Talent
Development Committee (for purposes of the “Executive Compensation”
section, the “Committee”) with respect to our NEOs:
Name |
|
Position
during 2021 |
William
F. Gifford, Jr. |
|
Chief
Executive Officer, Altria Group, Inc. |
Salvatore
Mancuso |
|
Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Altria Group,
Inc. |
Murray
R. Garnick |
|
Executive
Vice President and General Counsel, Altria Group, Inc. |
Jody
L. Begley |
|
Executive
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Altria Group,
Inc. |
Heather
A. Newman |
|
Senior Vice
President, Corporate Strategy, Altria Group, Inc. |
28 www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Overview
Compensation
Philosophy
Our goal is to design
our executive compensation program to align the interests of our
executive officers with the interests of our shareholders. We
believe this requires:
clear
articulation of corporate and individual performance
goals |
|
a
competitive, financially disciplined executive compensation
program that rewards past success and creates
the appropriate incentives for
future business success |
|
transparent
measurement against both corporate and individual performance goals |
Business
Performance
Our business performance
is a key factor in determining executive compensation. Altria
delivered outstanding results in 2021 across our businesses,
including strong financial performance, progress toward our Vision
and advancements in our ESG efforts. The following graphs summarize
our one- and three-year performance against key performance
measures:
Adjusted Diluted EPS (1) (12/31/2018
– 12/31/2021) ($) |
|
|
Dividend Rate (1) (8/22/2019
– 8/26/2021) ($) |

(1) 2018
and 2019 adjusted diluted EPS amounts were recast to reflect
changes to ABI special items.
(2) Compound
annual growth rate (“CAGR”) based on 2018 adjusted diluted EPS of
$4.02.
|
|
|

(1) Annualized
dividend based on quarterly dividend rate per share of Altria
common stock declared during each year.
(2) CAGR
based on the annualized dividend rate per share of Altria common
stock of $3.20 that was declared in August 2018.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021 TSR (1) (12/31/2020
– 12/31/2021) (%) |
|
|
Three-Year TSR (1) (12/31/2018
– 12/31/2021) (%) |

(1) FactSet
Daily Return (December 31, 2020–December 31, 2021). Assumes
reinvestment of dividends as of the ex-dividend date.
|
|
|

(1) FactSet
Daily Return (December 31, 2018–December 31, 2021). Assumes
reinvestment of dividends as of the ex-dividend date.
|
Altria Group, Inc. –
Proxy Statement 29
Table of
Contents
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Pay-For-Performance
The following graph
illustrates the relationship between our CEO’s total direct
compensation (including annualized LTIP compensation) and our
indexed TSR:

(1) |
CEO pay reflects an
annualized allocation of the actual award for the 2017 — 2019 LTIP
performance cycle for 2019 and allocations of the
target awards for the three-year LTIP award performance cycles
commencing in 2020 and 2021. The 2020 and 2021 cycles include
transition multipliers as discussed under
“Long-Term Incentives: 2021 – 2023 LTIP Awards” on page
44. |
(2) |
Indexed TSR reflects a
December 31, 2018 starting point (with a nominal value of 100) and
represents the total growth (including dividends) from that date
through each December 31. |
(3) |
2019 represents the total
direct compensation of our former CEO, Mr. Howard A. Willard
III. |
(4) |
2020 represents Mr.
Gifford’s total direct compensation, which was a mix of his total
direct compensation as CFO (January 1 through April 15)
and as CEO (April 16 through December 31). |
(5) |
2021
represents Mr. Gifford’s total direct compensation. |
30 www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Say on Pay and Shareholder
Engagement
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the 2021 Annual
Meeting, over
85%
of the votes cast
approved our NEO compensation on an
advisory basis.
|
We
provide our shareholders with an annual advisory vote (“say on
pay”) on the compensation of our NEOs. While this vote is not
binding on us, our Board or the Committee, the Committee takes the
results of say on pay votes and shareholders’ perspectives and
feedback into consideration when making future decisions with
respect to our executive compensation program.
The
Committee is committed to regularly reviewing our executive
compensation program in the context of our compensation
philosophy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We
periodically engage with large investors to discuss our executive
compensation program. We value the perspectives we gain from these
conversations. As evidence of our responsiveness to prior
shareholder feedback, best practices and market trends, the
Committee or management made changes to Altria’s executive
compensation program over the past several years. Examples of these
changes include:
Year |
|
Change |
2021 |
|
■
The
Committee adopted new guidelines related to executive officers
departing Altria for reasons other than normal retirement, death,
disability or change of control:
■ The
Committee will not accelerate vesting or make payments for
forfeited long-term performance-based awards (such as PSUs granted
after 2020 and LTIP cash payments) based on target performance.
Rather, the Committee will base such vesting or payments on actual
performance either for the full cycle or through the date of
separation. The guidelines further specify that such vesting or
payments will typically be prorated for the period that the
executive officer worked during the performance
cycle(s).
■ As
a general proposition, special separation payments for voluntary
departures are disfavored and will only be paid under unusual
circumstances. If unusual circumstances exist that warrant
additional payment, the Committee will disclose the rationale, and
total severance payments may not exceed three times the executive’s
base salary.
■ The
Committee modified our executive stock ownership guidelines to
exclude unvested PSUs as counting towards ownership
requirements.
|
2020 |
|
■ The
Committee transitioned our cash-based LTIP from three-year
end-to-end performance cycles to three-year overlapping cycles,
with a new performance cycle introduced each year, aligning our pay
design with that of our peers and enabling the Committee to
re-prioritize financial or strategic focus areas as needed to
successfully pursue our Vision.
■ Management
eliminated physical exams as an executive perquisite.
|
The
Committee intends to continue its consistent practice of designing
executive compensation programs that:
■ |
align the interests of
shareholders and executives; |
■ |
deliver executive pay
that is aligned with company performance; |
■ |
focus executives on
creating value in both the short- and long-term; and |
■ |
do not encourage
unnecessary or excessive risk-taking. |
Altria Group, Inc. –
Proxy Statement 31
Table of
Contents
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
2021 Performance of
NEOs
The
Committee considered several factors in approving each element of
2021 executive compensation. For the 2021 Annual Incentive Award
plan, the Committee primarily evaluated our financial and strategic
performance, as described under “Business Performance” on page 29
The Committee also considered the individual performance of each
NEO for purposes of approving salary increases, annual cash
incentive awards and equity awards. Executives receive variable
elements of short- and long-term compensation only after the
relevant performance period has ended and the Committee has
assessed Altria’s actual performance relative to stated goals
established at the beginning of the period. In addition, the
Committee considers industry compensation market data and tally
sheets for each of the NEOs that include their total cash and
long-term compensation for the last three years.
The
Committee evaluated each of our NEO’s progress against their
performance goals and the relationship of their performance to our
overall 2021 results. We discuss the 2021 performance of each NEO
below.
|
|
|
|
|
William F. Gifford, Jr.
Chief Executive
Officer
Key Responsibilities
Mr. Gifford
provided strategic leadership to the executive team and employees
in a dynamic, competitive and highly regulated environment. He also
served as one of our designated directors on the board of directors
of ABI.
|
2021
Achievements
Mr. Gifford:
■ Maintained
employee focus on our Vision to responsibly lead the transition of
adult smokers to a smoke-free future, Our Cultural Aspiration and
Inclusion & Diversity Aiming Points as Altria navigated a
dynamic, highly competitive environment;
■ Led
Altria in achieving 5.7% adjusted diluted EPS growth and 3.3% total
adjusted OCI growth for 2021; (1)
■ Championed
the expansion of our internal talent development system that gives
employees new opportunities for growth and our people leaders
broader exposure to talent throughout the enterprise;
■ Oversaw
our significant ESG accomplishments, including being the first U.S.
tobacco company to issue a standalone Task Force on Climate-related
Financial Disclosures report, receiving a double ‘A’ rating from
CDP for tackling climate change and protecting water security, and
sponsoring TruAge™, a digital age verification system to help
prevent underage use of tobacco products; and
■ Provided executive sponsorship of our MOSAIC
(LGBTQ+) employee resource group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Adjusted
diluted EPS growth and total adjusted OCI growth are non-GAAP
financial measures. See Exhibit A to this Proxy Statement for
information regarding non-GAAP financial measures and
reconciliations of such non-GAAP financial measures to the most
directly comparable GAAP financial measures. |
32 www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
|
|
|
|
Murray R. Garnick
Executive Vice
President and General Counsel
Key
Responsibilities
Mr. Garnick’s
responsibilities included leading Altria’s Law and Regulatory
Affairs functions and overseeing the development and execution of
legal and regulatory strategies.
|
2021
Achievements
Mr. Garnick:
■ Managed
complex litigation matters, including the Federal Trade Commission
administrative trial in connection with our investment in JUUL,
product liability and securities cases, Engle-progeny cases
and litigation/arbitration relating to the Master Settlement
Agreement and previously settled state agreements;
■ Oversaw
the preparation and filing of numerous tobacco product applications
with the FDA;
■ Led
legal strategy and support in connection with our existing
investments, including Cronos and JUUL, and potential opportunities
to accelerate progress toward our Vision;
■ Led
our advancement of science- and evidence-based regulatory policies
to promote the availability of reduced risk products;
and
■ Championed
numerous ID&E initiatives, including expanding diversity among
outside counsel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salvatore Mancuso
Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer
Key
Responsibilities
Mr. Mancuso’s
responsibilities included overseeing Altria’s Tax, Treasury, Audit,
Financial Planning & Analysis and Controller functions, while
also overseeing Corporate Security & Procurement and Philip
Morris Capital Corporation.
|
2021
Achievements
Mr. Mancuso:
■ Oversaw
cash returns to shareholders of more than $8.1 billion through
dividends and share repurchases;
■ Directed
the analysis of our strategic options in light of the expiration of
our five-year transfer restrictions on shares of ABI;
■ Oversaw
a liability management transaction to extend long-term debt
maturities at favorable rates;
■ Oversaw
supply chain efforts to maintain uninterrupted supply of goods and
services for our operating and service companies during the
COVID-19 pandemic and manage related inflation risks;
■ Oversaw
the continued wind-down of Philip Morris Capital
Corporation;
■ Provided
executive sponsorship of our black employee resource group (UNIFI);
and
■ Provided
executive sponsorship of our ESG efforts, including a renewable
electricity virtual power purchase agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altria Group, Inc. –
Proxy Statement 33
Table of
Contents
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
|
|
|
|
Jody L. Begley
Executive Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer
Key
Responsibilities
Mr. Begley led Altria’s
core tobacco businesses as well as Altria Group Distribution
Company, Engineering, Quality and Product Development
support.
|
2021
Achievements
Mr. Begley:
■ Led
both the smokeable and oral tobacco products segments in delivering
excellent financial results, while maintaining the strength of
Marlboro, Copenhagen and Black & Mild in a
difficult macro-economic environment;
■ Oversaw
further expansion of on! oral nicotine pouches, including
retail share growth, expanded retail distribution and achieving
unconstrained manufacturing capacity;
■ Advanced
our innovation system and adult smoker transition marketing
capabilities to accelerate the growth of smoke-free product
platforms;
■ Strengthened
trade programs in support of Revenue Growth Management and Adult
Smoker Transition efforts; and
■ Provided
executive sponsorship of our black employee resource group
(UNIFI).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heather A. Newman
Senior Vice
President, Corporate Strategy
Key
Responsibilities
Ms. Newman’s
responsibilities included leading Altria’s Corporate &
International Development, Strategy & Consumer Marketplace
Insights, Investor Relations, Corporate Communications and Digital
& Technology functions. In addition, Ms. Newman led the
development and execution of Altria’s Enterprise Initiatives and
Long-Term Strategic Plan.
|
2021
Achievements
Ms. Newman:
■ Oversaw
key corporate transactions, including the purchase of the remaining
20% of the global on! business and the sale of Ste. Michelle
Wine Estates;
■ Oversaw
and executed our enterprise initiatives and long-term strategic
planning process geared at accelerating progress toward our Vision
while managing complex strategic matters;
■ Oversaw
and executed several organizational enhancements, including
creating a new Digital & Technology Organization and expanding
our international footprint;
■ Oversaw
our management and governance of our investments in Cronos and
JUUL; and
■ Provided
executive sponsorship for our Rise employee resource group for
employees impacted by disabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Executive Compensation
Design
Principles
Our
executive compensation program includes multiple performance
metrics to assess the efforts of all executives in pursuing our
strategies. Specifically, our program is designed to satisfy the
following objectives:
■ |
promote pursuit of
business strategies that are aligned with our Vision, intended to
create long-term value for shareholders and executed with
integrity; |
■ |
reward responsible and
quality execution by making a significant portion of our
executives’ compensation dependent on the achievement by Altria of
key financial and strategic goals and their individual
performance; |
■ |
align the interests of
shareholders and executives through equity and cash
performance-based long-term incentive awards, stock ownership and
holding requirements and anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies
with respect to our stock; |
■ |
build leadership
capabilities and culture to achieve our Vision and Our Cultural
Aspiration; and |
■ |
promote
internal fairness and a disciplined qualitative and quantitative
assessment of performance. |
The
elements of our executive compensation program serve these
objectives with the following design principles (as shown in the
chart below), including a mix of:
■ |
fixed and at-risk
variable performance-based compensation, with executives at higher
levels subject to a higher proportion of variable
compensation; |
■ |
short- and long-term
compensation to appropriately reward and motivate the achievement
of both annual and long-term goals and objectives; |
■ |
cash and equity
compensation that seeks to discourage actions solely driven by our
stock price to the detriment of strategic goals and to minimize the
potentially dilutive nature of equity compensation on shareholder
value; and |
■ |
equity
compensation consisting of RSU and PSU awards. |
2021 CEO
and Other NEOs Pay Mix (1)(2)

(1) |
Includes
2021 salary range midpoint, target award under the 2021 Annual
Incentive Award plan, target value of 2021 equity awards and target
2021–2023 LTIP award. |
(2) |
Due
to rounding, percentages may not total 100%. |
Altria Group, Inc. –
Proxy Statement 35
Table of
Contents
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
The
target Long-Term Cash Incentive percentages in the chart above
reflect target award amounts approved by the Committee before
application of the 117% transition multiplier that is described
under “Long-Term Incentives: 2021 – 2023 LTIP Awards” on page 44.
Presenting the target award amounts before the application of the
multiplier is intended to better illustrate the mix of compensation
without the distortive effects of the transition multiplier.
Application of the transition multiplier would yield the following
percentages:
■ |
CEO: Salary (11%),
Annual Incentive (17%), Long-Term Cash Incentive (32%), PSUs (16%)
and RSUs (24%); |
|
|
■ |
Band B: Salary (18%),
Annual Incentive (17%), Long-Term Cash Incentive (29%), PSUs (15%)
and RSUs (22%); and |
|
|
■ |
Band C: Salary (23%),
Annual Incentive (18%), Long-Term Cash Incentive (26%), PSUs (13%)
and RSUs (20%). |
2021 Executive Compensation
Program Elements
The table
below summarizes the elements and objectives of the 2021 executive
compensation program for the NEOs. The general objective of each
element is to attract and retain world-class leaders.
Salary
Fixed cash compensation based on role
at Altria.
|
|
■ Provide financial stability
■ Recognize individual role, experience, responsibility and
performance
|
Annual Incentive Awards
Cash-based incentive plan based on
performance during the plan year.
|
|
■ Recognize
annual company financial and strategic performance after it is
delivered
■ Recognize
annual individual performance after it is delivered
|
Long-Term Incentive Compensation |
|
|
Equity Awards
RSU and PSU awards based
on prior year’s individual performance and advancement potential,
vesting after a three-year period. PSU payout amount tied to
achievement of company financial performance measures.
|
|
■ Align NEOs’
interests with shareholders through company performance and
building stock ownership
■ Recognize
individual performance after it is delivered and advancement
potential
■ For PSUs,
recognize company financial performance after it is
delivered
■ Retain talented leaders
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan
Cash-based incentive
plan based on three-year financial and strategic goals.
|
|
■ Align NEOs’
interests with shareholders
■ Recognize
long-term company financial and strategic performance after it is
delivered
■ Retain talented
leaders
|
36 www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Post-Termination
Benefits and Change in Control Payments |
|
Defined
Benefit Plans
Retirement plans
providing for the continuation of a portion of compensation upon
retirement or separation from service. Generally, employees hired
prior to January 1, 2008 are eligible.
|
|
■ Provide
opportunity for financial security in retirement
|
|
Defined Contribution
Plans
Annual cash contribution
based on a formula related to adjusted diluted EPS growth and, for
employees not participating in a defined benefit plan, a
supplemental contribution and matching contributions. Includes an
Altria stock investment option.
|
|
■ Provide
opportunity for financial security in retirement
■ Provide
additional opportunity to build stock ownership
|
|
|
|
Change in Control
Payments
Payments to executives
in connection with a defined change in the ownership of Altria.
Change in control provisions are contained in our 2015 PIP and 2020
PIP.
|
|
■ Allow
NEOs to focus on delivering shareholder value in a period of
uncertainty
■ Allow
NEOs to receive awards granted for periods of performance before a
change in control
|
Termination
Payments
For certain types of
involuntary separations, potential for severance benefits
(including continuation of salary and medical coverage based on
years of service). Our NEOs are eligible for the same severance
benefits as our other salaried employees.
|
|
■ Provide
opportunity for protection upon an unexpected event
|
|
|
|
For all
NEOs, a vehicle allowance (which terminates in 2023). For the CEO,
a home security system and, subject to an annual allowance,
personal use of company aircraft. |
|
■ Provide
personal security |
|
|
|
Medical
coverage, group life insurance and other welfare benefits generally
available to all salaried employees. |
|
■ Promote
health and financial security |
Altria Group, Inc. –
Proxy Statement 37
Table of
Contents
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
2021 Executive Compensation
Program Decisions
Changes to Annual
Incentive Measures
The Committee regularly
reviews the measures used for purposes of Altria’s
performance-based compensation. In 2021, the Committee modified the
measures for the annual incentive cycle as follows:
Previous
Measures (weighting) |
New
Measures (weighting) |
Adjusted
diluted EPS growth (75%) |
Adjusted diluted EPS
growth (30%) |
Adjusted
discretionary cash flow (25%) |
Adjusted discretionary
cash flow (25%) |
|
Total adjusted OCI
(30%) |
|
Strategic
initiatives (15%) |
The Committee believes
that the financial measures above align with our financial goals
and the interests of our shareholders. Regarding strategic
initiatives, the Committee previously made discretionary
adjustments to the Annual Incentive Award rating based on
performance against those initiatives. In 2021, performance against
strategic initiatives was included directly in the determination of
the Annual Incentive Award rating to incentivize progress towards
our Vision. The Committee also (i) added total adjusted OCI as a
financial measure, reflecting the importance of operating company
profitability for investments in our Vision and (ii) reduced the
weight of adjusted diluted EPS growth (which is also a measure used
in the components of our long-term incentives) to allow for the
addition of the strategic initiatives and total adjusted OCI
measures to the formula.
Salary
The Committee considers
several factors when reviewing and setting salaries for our NEOs,
including each executive’s individual performance, level of
responsibility and experience, the relationship between salaries
paid to other Altria executives and the position of the executive’s
salary within the applicable salary range. Additionally, the
Committee periodically compares the salaries of our NEOs to others
holding comparable positions at Compensation Survey Group (“CSG”)
companies. The Committee analyzes all these factors in the
aggregate in determining NEO salaries.
Salaries are relevant in
establishing annual and, for executives in bands A and B, long-term
cash incentive award targets, and factor into retirement, group
life insurance and certain other benefits available to all salaried
employees. The Committee reviews salaries for our NEOs other than
our CEO on an annual basis and reviews our CEO’s salary
approximately every two years. Generally, any adjustments are
effective March 1.
The Committee increased
the salaries of our NEOs based on the criteria noted above as
follows:
2021
Salary Changes
|
|
|
|
2021
Salary Range |
|
2020 |
|
2021 |
|
|
Name |
|
Band |
|
Minimum
($) |
|
Maximum
($) |
|
Salary
($) |
|
Salary
($) |
|
Increase
(%) |
William F. Gifford, Jr. |
|
A |
|
|
910,000 |
|
|
|
2,090,000 |
|
|
|
1,250,000 |
|
|
|
1,250,000 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Salvatore Mancuso |
|
B |
|
|
501,700 |
|
|
|
1,153,900 |
|
|
|
650,000 |
|
|
|
676,700 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Murray R. Garnick |
|
B |
|
|
501,700 |
|
|
|
1,153,900 |
|
|
|
902,000 |
|
|
|
924,600 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Jody L. Begley |
|
B |
|
|
501,700 |
|
|
|
1,153,900 |
|
|
|
650,000 |
|
|
|
676,700 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Heather A. Newman |
|
C |
|
|
408,800 |
|
|
|
940,200 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
520,500 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
38 www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Annual
Incentives
The Annual Incentive
Award plan is a cash-based, pay-for-performance plan for salaried
employees, including our NEOs. Participants have an annual award
target based on salary band and expressed as a percentage of
salary. The Committee annually reviews our benchmarking process
establishing award targets and reviews and approves any target
changes for employees in salary band I and above. Annual incentive
awards are paid only after both business and individual results are
assessed against targeted levels of performance. No individual is
guaranteed an award. In the event of a salary band change during
the performance cycle, award targets are adjusted on a prorated
basis. Each of our NEOs remained in their same salary band during
2021.
At the conclusion of
each year, the Committee reviews Altria’s performance against
financial measures and strategic initiatives and assigns a rating
from 0% to 130%. The measures used in 2021 (and the respective
weightings) are identified above under “Changes to Annual Incentive
Measures.”
In determining Altria’s
performance in 2021 against the measures, the Committee considered
the following:
Annual
Incentive Award Measures ($ in millions, except per share
data)
|
|
Results and
Rating
(from 0% - 130%) |
|
Weighting |
|
Weighted
Result |
Adjusted Diluted EPS Growth (1)
(Rating Range) |
|
 |
|
30% |
|
34.0% |
Adjusted Discretionary Cash Flow (1)
(Rating Range) |
|
 |
|
25% |
|
32.4% |
Total Adjusted OCI (1)
(Rating Range) |
|
 |
|
30% |
|
30.0% |
Strategic Initiatives
(Rating Range) |
|
 |
|
15% |
|
16.5% |
(1) |
Adjusted
diluted EPS, adjusted discretionary cash flow and total adjusted
OCI are non-GAAP financial measures. See Exhibit A to this Proxy
Statement for information regarding non-GAAP financial measures and
reconciliations of such non-GAAP financial measures to the most
directly comparable GAAP financial measures. |
Altria
Group, Inc. – Proxy
Statement 39
Table of
Contents
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
The 2021 strategic
initiatives against which the Committee evaluated Altria’s
performance, as shown above, were designed to promote our long-term
success. Those initiatives and results are below:
Strategic
Initiative |
|
Result |
■ |
Enhance the
employee experience and build ownership and accountability in
achieving our Vision, Inclusion & Diversity Aiming Points and
talent and culture objectives. |
|
Altria
exceeded expectations by enhancing the diversity and capability of
our talent through a new system designed to improve fairness,
transparency and inclusiveness in the internal hiring and promotion
process and delivering training and resources to support cultural
objectives; continuing to support employees through the COVID-19
pandemic with employee well-being resources and remote working
practices; making progress toward the Inclusion & Diversity
Aiming Points with respect to people of color; and achieving strong
engagement survey results. |
■ |
Invest to
develop and expand our portfolio of FDA authorized non-combustible
products and actively convert adult smokers to them. |
|
Altria met
expectations, making progress in developing our innovative tobacco
product platform, acquiring the remaining 20% of the global
on! business and conducting thorough science-based
engagement and advocacy in pursuit of tobacco harm
reduction. |
■ |
Evolve our
data, analytics and technology capabilities to accelerate and
transform critical opportunities and increase efficiencies to grow
OCI, while building an enterprise-wide digital and technology
strategy. |
|
Altria met
expectations by designing and rolling-out a new digital and
technology strategy to accelerate our digital transformation,
identify new value creation opportunities and optimize value in our
traditional tobacco businesses. |
■ |
Maximize
the long-term profitability of our cigarette, cigar and moist
smokeless tobacco businesses while shifting resources and
infrastructure to accelerate non-combustible product
growth. |
|
PM USA, JMC
and USSTC exceeded expectations, delivering strong financial
results benefitting in part from wholesale and retail trade program
enhancements and protecting the portfolio from an increased federal
excise tax. |
■ |
Achieve the
dollar share objective under the IQOS distribution agreement
to maintain exclusive distribution rights in the U.S. |
|
PM USA
achieved the dollar share objective to maintain its exclusive
license and distribution rights for IQOS in the U.S. based
on the performance of IQOS in the Charlotte, N.C.
market. |
■ |
Expand
IQOS retail infrastructure to additional markets and broaden
product availability. |
|
PM USA’s
IQOS team suspended this initiative due to the International
Trade Commission’s orders banning the importation, sale,
distribution and marketing of IQOS and Marlboro
HeatSticks. |
■ |
Increase
on! velocity in distributed stores by achieving specified
volume or share objectives.
|
|
The Helix
team exceeded expectations, achieving volume and share that
exceeded both objectives through achieving unconstrained
manufacturing capacity and expanding retail store
distribution. |
■ |
Build a
marketing plan with supporting initiatives to drive on!
trial and adoption through actions such as core tobacco
direct-marketing vehicles and audience segmentation. |
|
The Helix
team met expectations by increasing on! awareness through
enhanced retail visibility and new marketing channels, and by
driving trial among adult tobacco consumers through unique
promotional offerings. |
■ |
Prepare for
on! modified risk tobacco product (“MRTP”) filing in
2022. |
|
The Helix
team met expectations by delivering a pre-submission package to the
FDA and completing key elements of the MRTP filing planned for
2022. |
40 www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Based on the sum of the
weighted results for the financial measures and the strategic
initiatives, the Annual Incentive Award rating for 2021 was
113%.
2021
Annual Incentive Award Measures (weighting) |
|
Weighted
Result (%) |
Adjusted
diluted EPS growth (30%) |
|
34.0 |
|
Adjusted
discretionary cash flow (25%) |
|
32.4 |
|
Total
adjusted OCI (30%) |
|
30.0 |
|
Strategic
initiatives (15%) |
|
16.5 |
|
2021
Annual Incentive Award Rating (rounded) |
|
112.9 |
(113) |
As part of our ID&E
efforts and to drive accountability for cultural fluency among
people leaders, our NEOs, along with all people leaders, were
assessed ID&E ratings as part of the 2021 performance
management process. A rating of at least Ally or Advocate was
required to receive our highest individual performance rating
for purposes of the Annual Incentive Award
formula.
ID&E
Rating |
Descriptor |
Advocate |
Proactively leads
change to create a more equitable and inclusive environment, and
helps others deepen their advocacy |
Ally |
Supports change to
advance ID&E |
Aware |
Recognizes the need for
change to advance ID&E |
Inactive |
Does not
demonstrate support for change to advance ID&E |
The Committee used the
Annual Incentive Award business performance rating, together with
individual performance of the NEOs in determining the 2021 awards
below. See “2021 Performance of NEOs” beginning on page 32. The
following formula was the basis for determining awards under the
2021 Annual Incentive Award plan:
Salary |
x |
Target
(% of salary) |
x |
Business
Performance
Rating |
x |
Individual
Performance
Multiplier |
= |
Annual
Incentive
Award |
2021
Annual Incentive Award Target Percentages, Award Ranges and Actual
Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target |
|
2021
Business
Performance |
|
|
Individual
Performance |
|
|
Actual
Award for
2021 Performance |
|
Name |
|
Band |
|
Salary
($) |
|
Target
(%) |
|
|
Award
(1)
($) |
|
Rating
(2)
(%) |
|
|
Multiplier
(3)
(%) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
(%
of
target) |
|
William F. Gifford, Jr. |
|
A |
|
|
1,250,000 |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
1,875,000 |
|
|
113 |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
2,754,000 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
Salvatore Mancuso |
|
B |
|
|
676,700 |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
642,865 |
|
|
113 |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
835,400 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
Murray R. Garnick |
|
B |
|
|
924,600 |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
878,370 |
|
|
113 |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
1,141,400 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
Jody L. Begley |
|
B |
|
|
676,700 |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
642,865 |
|
|
113 |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
944,400 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
Heather A. Newman |
|
C |
|
|
520,500 |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
416,400 |
|
|
113 |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
611,700 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Assumes
100% business and individual performance. |
(2) |
The
business performance rating can range from 0% to 130%. |
(3) |
The
individual performance multipliers for our NEOs other than the CEO
are based on individual performance on a four-point scale and can
range from 0% to 150%. The individual performance multiplier for
our CEO is determined at the Committee’s discretion and can range
from 0% to 175%. |
Altria
Group, Inc. – Proxy
Statement 41
Table of
Contents
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Long-Term
Incentives
We award long-term
incentives to executive officers through a combination of equity
awards and performance-based cash incentive awards under the LTIP.
For equity awards, executives received a mix of 60% RSUs and 40%
PSUs. Together, PSUs and the LTIP deliver over 60% of our NEOs’
target long-term incentives through performance-based elements,
with the remainder comprised of time-based RSUs.
Target Long-Term Incentive Mix (1)

(1) |
This chart reflects the percentage of
long-term incentives attributable to the 2021 – 2023 LTIP
performance cycle without applying the 117% transition multiplier.
The transition multiplier is described under “Long-Term Incentives:
2021 – 2023 LTIP Awards” on page 44. |
|
|
Long-Term Incentives: Equity Awards
Equity awards are
intended to focus executives on
increasing long-term shareholder value, enhance executive retention
and promote executive stock ownership. Award amounts recognize
prior year performance and, for our NEOs other than our CEO,
advancement potential. Vesting amounts reflect any stock
appreciation and, for PSUs, performance against the financial
measures during the vesting period. The awards generally vest three
years after the date of the award, subject to earlier vesting on
death, disability, retirement on or after age 65 or potentially in
connection with a change in control. This vesting period is
intended to retain and motivate executives, while promoting
long-term performance. The number of PSUs granted to an executive
represents a target number of shares; for PSUs awarded in 2021, the
actual share payout can range from 0% to 156% of the target based
on company performance against specified measures.
For RSUs, recipients
receive cash dividend equivalents during the vesting period. For
PSUs, dividends are accrued and paid out at the end of the
performance period based on the final number of PSUs that vest, if
any. The Committee annually reviews equity award targets against
competitive data.
From time to time, the
Committee grants special equity awards to select executives in key
roles or with high advancement potential for purposes of retention
and to align with benchmarking data. These special equity awards
generally have a longer vesting period of five years. No special
equity awards were granted to our NEOs in 2021.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021
Equity Award Highlights
■ 60%
RSUs / 40% PSUs
■ Vesting
period of at least three years
■ RSUs:
Cash dividend equivalent payments
■ PSUs:
Dividend equivalents not paid until end of performance period and
based on shares actually earned
■ NEO
grant award values based on:
■ Executive’s
individual performance in year prior to the grant;
■ Executive’s
advancement potential at the time of grant (other than
CEO);
■ Committee
discretion; and
■ Competitive
benchmarking.
■ Number
of RSUs and PSUs awarded is based on fair market value of our stock
on the grant date
■ Strong
stock holding requirements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Committee grants
equity awards to our CEO based on its assessment of his
performance, Altria’s performance and competitive data. For our
NEOs other than our CEO, the Committee establishes an appropriate
range of equity awards, which is based on the NEO’s salary band,
advancement potential, individual performance and competitive data.
The Committee then approves awards based on advancement potential
and individual performance. Individual awards are generally granted
on the date of Committee approval and capped under our 2015 PIP and
our 2020 PIP. No individual is guaranteed an award.
42 www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
The targets and actual
equity awards for grants made to our NEOs in 2021 were as
follows:
Name |
|
Band
at
Grant Date |
|
Equity
Target
($) |
|
Equity
Award Range
($) |
|
Actual
Equity
Award
(1)(2)
($) |
William F. Gifford, Jr. |
|
A |
|
|
5,400,000 |
|
|
|
3,240,000-8,100,000 |
|
|
|
6,000,059 |
|
Salvatore Mancuso |
|
B |
|
|
1,750,000 |
|
|
|
1,050,000-2,625,000 |
|
|
|
2,012,526 |
|
Murray R. Garnick |
|
B |
|
|
1,750,000 |
|
|
|
1,050,000-2,625,000 |
|
|
|
2,012,526 |
|
Jody L. Begley |
|
B |
|
|
1,750,000 |
|
|
|
1,050,000-2,625,000 |
|
|
|
2,012,526 |
|
Heather A. Newman |
|
C |
|
|
990,000 |
|
|
|
594,000-1,485,000 |
|
|
|
1,188,045 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The amount shown is the
aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards determined pursuant
to Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Codification Topic
718. The number of RSUs and PSUs awarded in 2021, together with the
grant date values and vesting terms of the RSUs and the PSUs
awarded, is disclosed in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards during
2021 table on page 53. |
(2) |
Annual
equity awards consist of 60% RSUs and 40% PSUs. |
Financial Performance
Measures for 2021 PSUs
For the PSUs granted in
2021 with a 2021 – 2023 performance cycle, the Committee designated
the following performance measures:
(1) |
adjusted diluted EPS
growth (weighted 75%); and |
(2) |
cash
conversion (1) (weighted 25%). |
|
|
(1) |
Defined
as the portion of our adjusted net earnings that is converted to
discretionary free cash flow, which excludes certain items such as
tobacco and health litigation payments. |
The weighted result of
these measures will be subject to a potential increase or decrease
of up to 20% based on relative TSR versus the S&P 500 Food,
Beverage & Tobacco Index (defined as the companies that
comprised the S&P 500 Food, Beverage & Tobacco Index as of
January 1, 2021 and remain in the Index as of December 31,
2023).
The score of the
financial measures, adjusted by the TSR multiplier, determines the
aggregate score and the number of shares payable under the PSU
awards. The aggregate score may not exceed 156% of target. The
Committee believes that the combination of these measures provides
solid alignment between Altria’s business strategies and our
shareholders’ interests.
2019 PSU
Performance
The PSUs granted in
January 2019 with a 2019 – 2021 performance cycle (“2019 PSUs”)
were measured against adjusted diluted EPS growth and relative TSR
versus the S&P 500 Food, Beverage & Tobacco Index. The
tables below reflect the performance of the 2019 PSUs against each
measure, followed by the final determination of the number of
shares of Altria common stock delivered to each NEO at the end of
the three-year performance period.
|
|
|
Metric
Rating % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
Financial
Metrics |
|
|
0 |
|
70 |
|
80 |
|
100 |
|
120 |
|
130
(1) |
|
|
Result |
|
Rating |
|
Weighting |
|
Result |
2019 – 2021
Adjusted Diluted EPS Growth (%) |
|
|
≤(3.0) |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
6.9-7.3 |
|
8.0 |
|
≥8.4 |
|
|
4.7% |
|
76.6 |
|
50% |
|
38.3% |
Relative
TSR Percentile (2)(3) |
|
|
<25th |
|
25th |
|
|
|
50th |
|
|
|
≥75th |
|
|
15th |
|
0 |
|
50% |
|
0% |
2019 PSU
Rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38% |
|
|
(1) |
Rating for each metric
cannot exceed 130%. |
(2) |
Versus the companies that
comprised the S&P 500 Food, Beverage & Tobacco Index as of
January 1, 2019 and remained in the Index as of December 31,
2021. |
(3) |
Altria’s
three-year TSR for the period ending December 31, 2021 was
20.2%. |
Altria
Group, Inc. – Proxy
Statement 43
Table of
Contents
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
The 2019 PSUs granted
and number of shares of Altria common stock delivered to our NEOs
in February 2022 were as follows:
Name |
|
2019 PSUs
Granted
(#) |
|
2019
PSU
Performance
Rating
(%) |
|
Altria
Shares
Delivered
(#) |
William F. Gifford, Jr. |
|
17,212 |
|
|
38 |
|
6,541 |
Salvatore Mancuso |
|
5,289 |
|
|
38 |
|
2,010 |
Murray R. Garnick |
|
17,212 |
|
|
38 |
|
6,541 |
Jody L. Begley |
|
5,086 |
|
|
38 |
|
1,933 |
Heather A. Newman |
|
2,739 |
|
|
38 |
|
1,041 |
Long-Term Incentives:
2021 – 2023 LTIP Awards
The 2021 – 2023 LTIP is
a long-term cash incentive performance plan that uses a three-year
performance cycle (January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2023), an
approach consistent with our long-term strategic planning process.
At the beginning of each performance cycle, the Committee approves
long-term financial and strategic performance goals, to be measured
after completion of the performance cycle. The financial goals and
the strategic goals are each weighted 50%. Each executive has an
award target based on his or her salary band. Awards are payable in
cash after the end of the three-year performance cycle based on the
Committee’s assessment of Altria’s actual performance against the
financial and strategic performance goals during the entire award
cycle. The Committee retains the discretion to adjust individual
awards upward or downward, and no individual is guaranteed an
award.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021 – 2023 LTIP
Highlights
■ Three-year
performance cycle
■ Awards
based on our performance against long-term financial and strategic
goals and individual performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Committee considers
each of our NEO’s earnings opportunity under the LTIP when setting
compensation each year; however, those opportunities remain at risk
until the Committee’s final assessment after the end of the
three-year performance cycle.
The financial measures
for the 2021 – 2023 LTIP performance cycle are the same financial
measures for the 2021 PSUs discussed above:
(1) |
adjusted
diluted EPS growth (weighted 75%); and |
(2) |
cash
conversion (weighted 25%). |
As with the 2021 PSUs,
the weighted result of these measures will be subject to a
potential increase or decrease of up to 20% based on relative TSR
versus the S&P 500 Food, Beverage & Tobacco Index (defined
the same as for the 2021 PSUs). However, whereas the 2021 PSUs are
based entirely on these financial measures, the financial measures
count for half of the 2021 – 2023 LTIP rating, with performance
against the strategic initiatives counting for the other
half.
Specific details
regarding the strategic performance initiatives are provided to
executives, but are not disclosed publicly before the end of the
cycle because they are competitively sensitive. We expect to
disclose the relevant performance metrics for the 2021 – 2023 LTIP
performance cycle, as appropriate, after the compensation decisions
for the then-current NEOs have been made.
44 www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Following the conclusion
of the 2021 – 2023 LTIP performance cycle, the Committee will
assess Altria’s performance against the financial (adjusted by the
TSR multiplier) and strategic measures to determine the final LTIP
rating, which can range from 0% to 143%. The Committee, with
respect to the CEO, and the CEO, with respect to the other NEOs,
will also assess the individual performance of each executive to
determine the executive’s individual performance factor, which can
range from 0% to 150%.
A new three-year
performance cycle commences each January 1. The Committee believes
overlapping performance cycles align with market practices and are
consistent with our three-year PSU performance cycles and
appropriate for our increasingly dynamic business environment. In
connection with the change to overlapping LTIP performance cycles
in 2020, the Committee implemented transition multipliers of 183%
and 117% of the annual award target for the 2020 – 2022 and 2021 –
2023 LTIP performance cycles, respectively, which are intended to
mitigate the cash flow impact to our executives and maintain the
retentive value of the LTIP program, while maintaining the same
annual accrual as the prior end-to-end cycle approach used prior to
2020. See “Use of Overlapping LTIP Performance Cycles” beginning on
page 40 of our Proxy Statement for our 2021 Annual Meeting (filed
with the SEC on April 8, 2021) for further explanation.
The following formula is
the basis for determining the final 2021 – 2023 LTIP awards for the
NEOs:
Salary x Target % (1)
(Band A and B) |
|
Business
Performance
Rating |
|
Individual
Performance
Assessment |
|
Three-Year
LTIP Award |
Or |
x |
x |
= |
Dollar Target (1) (Below Band B) |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
In the event of a salary
or band change during the performance cycle, the award target will
be adjusted on a prorated basis. |
The award targets for
our NEOs for the 2021 – 2023 LTIP performance cycle before the
application of the business performance rating and individual
performance assessment, which will not be applied until after the
end of the three-year performance cycle, are:
Name |
|
Band |
|
Salary
($) |
|
Target
(% of Salary for
bands A and B,
$ for band C) |
|
Individual
Award
Target (1)(2)
($) |
William F. Gifford, Jr. |
|
A |
|
1,250,000 |
|
250% |
|
|
3,656,250 |
|
Salvatore Mancuso |
|
B |
|
676,700 |
|
140% |
|
|
1,106,078 |
|
Murray R. Garnick |
|
B |
|
924,600 |
|
140% |
|
|
1,512,500 |
|
Jody L. Begley |
|
B |
|
676,700 |
|
140% |
|
|
1,106,078 |
|
Heather A. Newman |
|
C |
|
520,500 |
|
$676,500 |
|
|
791,505 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Award targets reflect the
LTIP transition multiplier of 117%, which takes into account the
change from three-year end-to-end performance cycles to overlapping
performance cycles. |
(2) |
The award
targets reflect prorated amounts for Messrs. Mancuso, Garnick and
Begley due to salary changes during 2021. |
Altria
Group, Inc. – Proxy
Statement 45
Table of
Contents
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Perquisites
The perquisites we
provided to our NEOs in 2021 are set forth in the All Other
Compensation table on page 52. In addition to these perquisites,
our NEOs received the same benefits that were available to our
salaried employees generally.
Mr. Gifford is required
to use our aircraft for all air travel for purposes of security.
The Committee approved a 2021 allowance of $125,000 for Mr.
Gifford’s personal aircraft usage. However, Mr. Gifford did not use
any of that allowance in 2021. The amount attributed to the
personal use of our aircraft would include incremental costs,
including trip-related crew hotels and meals, in-flight food and
beverages, landing and ground handling fees, hourly maintenance
contracts, hangar or aircraft parking, fuel (based on the average
monthly cost of fuel per hour flown) and other smaller variable
costs. For purposes of calculating incremental costs, we would
include the incremental costs of any deadhead flights, or portions
thereof, made in connection with personal travel. Fixed costs
incurred in any event to operate our aircraft (e.g.,
aircraft purchase costs, depreciation, maintenance not related to
personal trips and flight crew salaries) would not be included. Mr.
Gifford is required to pay his own taxes on imputed taxable income
resulting from personal use of our aircraft. The allowance and Mr.
Gifford’s obligation to pay for personal use of the aircraft above
the allowance are reflected in a time-sharing agreement with
Altria. The Committee considers the potential value of personal
aircraft usage in determining the other components of Mr. Gifford’s
total compensation.
Post-Termination Benefits and Change in
Control Payments
We provide
post-termination benefits to our NEOs, including retirement
benefits and termination payments, if applicable, as well as
payments in connection with a change in control.
■ |
Retirement
Benefits. Our NEOs participate in certain qualified and
non-qualified retirement plans, which we believe promote executive
retention and provide the opportunity for financial security in
retirement. These retirement benefits are discussed in more detail
in the narrative following the Pension Benefits table on page 55
and the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation table on page
57. |
|
|
■ |
Change in Control
Payments. Our 2015 PIP and our 2020 PIP includes a
double-trigger provision for vesting or payment of annual incentive
awards, equity awards and long-term incentive cash awards, provided
that the successor entity continues or assumes the plans and awards
or replaces them with substantially similar awards. The details of
these provisions are discussed under “Payments upon Change in
Control or Termination of Employment” beginning on page
58. |
|
|
■ |
Termination
Payments. The Severance Pay Plan for Salaried Employees
(“Severance Plan”), which is generally applicable to all salaried
employees, provides an opportunity for financial protection against
the unexpected event of an involuntary termination of employment.
This plan is discussed further under “Payments upon Change in
Control or Termination of Employment” beginning on page
58. |
46 www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Decision Making
Process
Role of the Compensation and
Talent Development Committee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Committee determines and approves CEO compensation and reviews and
approves the compensation of the other executive
officers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Committee:
|
■ |
our overall executive
compensation philosophy and design. |
|
|
|
|
■ |
corporate and individual goals and objectives
relevant to the compensation of our CEO, evaluates the performance
of our CEO in light of these goals and objectives and determines
and approves the compensation of our CEO based on this
evaluation. |
|
|
|
|
■ |
the compensation of all executive
officers. |
|
|
|
■ |
Makes recommendations to our
Board with respect to incentive compensation plans and equity-based
plans, administers and makes awards under such plans and reviews
the cumulative effect of its actions. |
|
|
■ |
Monitors compliance by executives with our stock
ownership and holding requirements. |
|
|
■ |
Monitors risks related to the design of our
compensation program. |
|
|
■ |
Determines ratings for Altria’s performance for
the annual and long-term incentive award formulas. |
|
|
■ |
Reviews the results from a survey of CSG
companies conducted by Aon plc (“Aon”) that shows compensation data
and competitive practices. |
|
|
■ |
Reviews initiatives and programs related to
corporate culture and enterprise-wide talent
development. |
Committee
Compensation Decisions for Executive Officers (other than the
CEO)
Early each year, our CEO
presents to the Committee compensation recommendations for our
executive officers other than himself. The Committee reviews and
discusses these recommendations with our CEO and, exercising its
discretion, makes the final decision with respect to the
compensation of these individuals.
Committee
Establishment of CEO Performance Goals and CEO Performance
Evaluation
At the beginning of each
year, our CEO proposes annual individual performance goals to the
Committee for its consideration. The Committee establishes final
goals and reviews them with our Board. Following the end of the
year, the Committee discusses with the CEO his performance against
the goals established the prior year and then, in its sole
discretion, determines and approves the CEO’s compensation. Other
than discussing his prior year performance with the Committee, our
CEO has no role in setting his own compensation.
Altria
Group, Inc. – Proxy
Statement 47
Table of
Contents
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Role of
Consultants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
part of our annual compensation process, management engages Aon.
The Committee considers data provided by Aon as part of the
Committee’s executive compensation decision making
process. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aon:
■ |
Conducts a survey of CSG
companies. The survey collects compensation data and competitive
practices. |
|
|
■ |
Based on parameters developed by management,
provides competitive compensation information focused on chief
executive officer pay primarily from public filings, including
annual proxy filings, by companies within our CSG. |
|
|
■ |
Provides background information on companies as
reference for evaluating our CSG. |
|
|
■ |
Reviews our risk assessment process with respect
to our executive compensation program. |
Aon provides neither
advice nor recommendations on the form or amount of our executive
or director compensation, nor does Aon attend any Board or
Committee meetings.
Benchmarking
Compensation
Strategy
We design our executive
compensation program to deliver total compensation (salary, annual
and long-term cash awards, equity awards and benefits) at levels
between the 50th and the 75th percentiles of compensation
paid to executives in the CSG. We believe that this approach has
contributed to our industry leadership position and is important to
attract and retain world-class leaders, particularly given the
unique challenges of our industry. Actual total compensation can
exceed the 75th percentile or be below the
50th percentile depending on business and individual
performance.
Compensation Survey
Group
We annually compare our
executive compensation program with the programs of the CSG
companies. The purpose of this annual review is to assure that our
executive compensation program supports our ability to attract and
retain executive talent. When determining the companies to include
in the CSG, the Committee identifies companies that have all or
most of the following characteristics:
■ |
revenues generally between $5
and $75 billion; |
|
|
■ |
market capitalization of at least $10
billion; |
|
|
■ |
primarily focused on consumer
products; |
|
|
■ |
limited business segments; |
|
|
■ |
businesses generally focused within the United
States; and |
|
|
■ |
compete with us for executive
talent. |
|
|
48 www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Based on these criteria,
the Committee included the following companies in the 2021 CSG and
used this list for compensation-related decisions for
2021.
3M Company |
|
General Mills, Inc. |
|
Merck & Co., Inc. |
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company |
|
The Hershey Company |
|
Molson Coors Brewing Company |
Campbell Soup Company |
|
Kellogg Company |
|
Mondelēz
International, Inc. |
The Coca-Cola Company |
|
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. |
|
PepsiCo, Inc. |
Colgate-Palmolive Company |
|
Kimberly-Clark Corporation |
|
Philip Morris International Inc. |
Conagra Brands, Inc. |
|
The Kraft Heinz Company |
|
|
Eli Lilly and Company |
|
McDonald’s Corporation |
|
|
A cross-functional team
of executives in the Human Resources & Compliance, Law,
Corporate Audit and Finance departments periodically reviews our
compensation program (executive and non-executive) to identify
features that could encourage excessive risk-taking by program
participants and to assess the potential that such risks could have
a material adverse effect on Altria. In 2021, management requested
that its external compensation consultant, Aon, review this risk
assessment process to confirm consistency with prevailing best
practices. Aon’s review focused on features generally recognized as
potentially encouraging excessive risk-taking, features of our
programs that mitigate risk and management’s assessment of those
features.
After reviewing
management’s assessment in 2021, the Committee believes that
neither the compensation program’s design nor the individual
elements of executive compensation encourage employees, including
our NEOs, to take unnecessary or excessive risks. The executive
compensation program also incorporates risk-mitigating features
such as those shown in the chart on the right, which the Committee
considered as part of its assessment. We believe that any risks
arising from our compensation policies and practices are not likely
to have a material adverse effect on Altria.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-Mitigating
Features
■
Appropriate
compensation mix of fixed versus at-risk variable pay, annual
versus long-term pay, cash versus equity and performance-based
versus non-performance-based pay
■
Multiple
objective performance factors used for annual and long-term
incentive awards, coupled with the Committee’s discretion to
approve awards at lower than target
■
Caps on
annual and long-term incentive plan formulas
■
Peer
company benchmarking
■
Significant
stock ownership, holding requirements and
anti-hedging/anti-pledging policies
■
A
“clawback” policy providing for the adjustment or recovery of
executive compensation upon the restatement of our financial
statements
■
Individual
performance assessments that align our interests with the interests
of shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altria
Group, Inc. – Proxy
Statement 49
Table of
Contents
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Other
Considerations
Stock Ownership and Holding
Requirements and Prohibition on Hedging and Pledging
The Committee has
established stock ownership requirements under which all executives
are expected to hold our common stock in an amount equal to a
multiple of salary, as determined by their salary band, while they
are employed by the Company. If the stock price declines, an
executive may satisfy the requirement by holding a fixed number of
shares based on the stock price at the beginning of the executive’s
acquisition period. For our NEOs, the Committee set the
requirements as follows:
Band |
|
Multiple of
Salary |
A |
|
12 |
B |
|
6 |
C |
|
5 |
Additionally, we require
executive officers to hold any shares received as compensation
until they meet their stock ownership requirement.
We expect NEOs to meet
their ownership requirement within five years of becoming subject
to the requirement (or three years from a subsequent promotion date
that results in an increased ownership requirement). Unvested RSUs
count toward the stock ownership requirement; however, as of
October 26, 2021, unvested PSUs no longer count toward the
requirement. As of December 31, 2021, all our NEOs satisfied their
stock ownership requirement.
We have
policies prohibiting our NEOs from engaging in hedging and pledging
activities with respect to our shares, as described under
“Prohibition on Hedging and Pledging” on page 70.
“Clawback” Policy Regarding
the Adjustment or Recovery of Compensation
We have a “clawback”
policy providing for the adjustment or recovery of compensation in
certain circumstances. If our Board or an appropriate committee of
our Board determines that, as a result of a restatement of our
financial statements, an executive received more compensation than
would have been paid absent the incorrect financial statements, our
Board or the Committee, in its discretion, will take such action as
it deems necessary or appropriate to address the events that gave
rise to the restatement and to prevent its recurrence. Such action
may include, to the extent permitted by applicable law, in
appropriate cases, requiring partial or full reimbursement of any
bonus or other incentive compensation paid to the executive,
causing the partial or full cancellation of RSUs or PSUs, adjusting
the future compensation of such executive and dismissing or taking
legal action against the executive, in each case as our Board or
the Committee determines to be in the best interests of Altria and
our shareholders. Our RSU and PSU award agreements also include
“clawback” provisions.
Tax and Accounting
Considerations
In addition to our
executive compensation objectives and design principles, we
consider tax and accounting treatment when designing and
administering our compensation programs. One consideration is
Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m), which limits our ability to
deduct compensation paid to each covered officer for tax purposes
to $1.0 million annually, subject to an exception for certain
compensation granted or accrued before 2018. Covered officers
include any officer who for any year after 2016 was the principal
executive officer, principal financial officer or one of the next
three highest-paid officers.
Although the Committee
considers tax deductibility and other tax and accounting treatment
in making its compensation program decisions, the Committee’s
primary consideration is whether the compensation program promotes
our Vision and aligns the interests of executives with those of our
shareholders.
Compensation and Talent
Development Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
During 2021, no Altria
executive officer served on the board of directors or compensation
committee of any company that employs a member of our Board. No
member of the Committee at any time during 2021 or at any other
time had any relationship with us that would be required to be
disclosed as a related person transaction under applicable SEC
rules.
50 www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Compensation Tables and
Other Matters
Summary Compensation
Table
The following table
provides the compensation information of our NEOs for 2021, 2020
and 2019.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and
Principal
Position during 2021 |
|
Year |
|
Salary
($) |
|
Stock Awards
Grant Value (1)
($) |
|
Annual
Incentive
Plan
($) |
|
Long-Term
Incentive
Plan
($) |
|
Change in
Pension
Value (2)
($) |
|
All Other
Compensation (3)
($) |
|
Total
($) |
William F. Gifford,
Jr.,
Chief Executive Officer,
Altria Group, Inc. |
|
2021 |
|
1,250,000 |
|
6,000,059 |
|
2,754,000 |
|
— |
|
2,487,905 |
|
135,008 |
|
12,626,972 |
|
2020 |
|
1,144,167 |
|
5,707,085 |
|
2,100,000 |
|
— |
|
3,162,720 |
|
124,425 |
|
12,238,397 |
|
2019 |
|
871,667 |
|
2,200,099 |
|
890,500 |
|
2,851,200 |
|
2,456,241 |
|
104,052 |
|
9,373,759 |
Salvatore Mancuso,
Executive Vice
President and Chief
Financial Officer, Altria
Group, Inc. |
|
2021 |
|
672,250 |
|
2,012,526 |
|
835,400 |
|
— |
|
548,562 |
|
77,233 |
|
4,145,971 |
|
2020 |
|
616,333 |
|
2,791,174 |
|
616,700 |
|
— |
|
3,727,756 |
|
71,641 |
|
7,823,604 |
|
2019 |
|
514,950 |
|
676,039 |
|
555,300 |
|
1,008,500 |
|
1,538,272 |
|
74,421 |
|
4,367,482 |
Murray R. Garnick,
Executive Vice
President and
General Counsel,
Altria Group, Inc. |
|
2021 |
|
920,833 |
|
2,012,526 |
|
1,141,400 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
148,133 |
|
4,222,892 |
|
2020 |
|
897,667 |
|
2,207,049 |
|
890,700 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
148,258 |
|
4,143,674 |
|
2019 |
|
871,667 |
|
2,200,099 |
|
890,500 |
|
2,887,900 |
|
— |
|
149,855 |
|
7,000,021 |
Jody L. Begley,
Executive Vice
President and Chief
Operating Officer,
Altria Group, Inc. |
|
2021 |
|
672,250 |
|
2,012,526 |
|
944,400 |
|
— |
|
713,170 |
|
77,233 |
|
4,419,579 |
|
2020 |
|
583,667 |
|
1,291,147 |
|
603,300 |
|
— |
|
1,668,880 |
|
68,375 |
|
4,215,369 |
|
2019 |
|
507,500 |
|
650,089 |
|
610,000 |
|
821,400 |
|
1,034,722 |
|
79,036 |
|
3,702,747 |
Heather A. Newman,
Senior Vice President,
Corporate Strategy,
Altria Group, Inc. |
|
2021 |
|
517,083 |
|
1,188,045 |
|
611,700 |
|
— |
|
502,963 |
|
61,716 |
|
2,881,507 |
|
|
(1) |
The amount shown is the
aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards determined pursuant
to FASB Codification Topic 718. The number of RSUs and PSUs awarded
in 2021, together with their grant date values and vesting terms,
is disclosed in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards during 2021 table
on page 53. The assumptions we used in calculating the grant date
fair values of the RSUs and the PSUs awarded in 2021 are described
in Note 11 “Stock Plans” to our consolidated financial statements
in the 2021 Form 10-K. The table below provides the grant date fair
value of the PSUs awarded in 2021 for each of our NEOs assuming the
maximum performance level is achieved. |
|
|
|
William F.
Gifford, Jr.
($) |
|
Salvatore
Mancuso
($) |
|
Murray R.
Garnick
($) |
|
Jody L.
Begley
($) |
|
Heather A.
Newman
($) |
|
3,744,060 |
|
1,255,803 |
|
1,255,803 |
|
1,255,803 |
|
741,346 |
|
|
(2) |
The
amounts show the change in the present value of each NEO’s pension
benefits for each year from December 31 of the prior year to
December 31 of the applicable year. The change in 2021 was due to a
variety of factors, including growth in benefit due to additional
pay and service, passage of time and a change in the discount rate
and mortality assumptions. Mr. Garnick was hired after January 1,
2008 and, therefore, is not covered under our pension
plans. |
|
|
(3) |
Details of other
compensation for each of our NEOs appear in the All Other
Compensation table shown below. |
Altria
Group, Inc. – Proxy
Statement 51
Table of
Contents
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
All Other
Compensation
Name |
|
Year |
|
Allocation
to
Defined
Contribution
Plans (a)
($) |
|
Car
Expenses (b)
($) |
|
Executive
Physicals
($) |
|
Total
($) |
William F. Gifford,
Jr. |
|
2021 |
|
125,000 |
|
10,008 |
|
— |
|
135,008 |
|
|
2020 |
|
114,417 |
|
10,008 |
|
— |
|
124,425 |
|
|
2019 |
|
87,167 |
|
13,285 |
|
3,600 |
|
104,052 |
Salvatore Mancuso |
|
2021 |
|
67,225 |
|
10,008 |
|
— |
|
77,233 |
|
|
2020 |
|
61,633 |
|
10,008 |
|
— |
|
71,641 |
|
|
2019 |
|
51,495 |
|
19,326 |
|
3,600 |
|
74,421 |
Murray R. Garnick |
|
2021 |
|
138,125 |
|
10,008 |
|
— |
|
148,133 |
|
|
2020 |
|
134,650 |
|
10,008 |
|
3,600 |
|
148,258 |
|
|
2019 |
|
130,750 |
|
15,505 |
|
3,600 |
|
149,855 |
Jody L. Begley |
|
2021 |
|
67,225 |
|
10,008 |
|
— |
|
77,233 |
|
|
2020 |
|
58,367 |
|
10,008 |
|
— |
|
68,375 |
|
|
2019 |
|
50,750 |
|
24,686 |
|
3,600 |
|
79,036 |
Heather A. Newman |
|
2021 |
|
51,708 |
|
10,008 |
|
— |
|
61,716 |
|
|
(a) |
Amounts represent allocations
to tax-qualified and non-qualified supplemental defined
contribution plans. |
|
|
(b) |
Car expenses for 2020 and 2021 reflect an annual
cash vehicle allowance. For 2019, car expenses reflect the annual
cost of providing a leased vehicle and operating expenses,
including insurance, maintenance and repairs or, alternatively, a
vehicle allowance. |
52 www.altria.com
Table of
Contents
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
during 2021
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future
Payouts Under
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards |
|
Estimated Future
Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards
(3) |
|
All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of
Stock
or
Units (4)
(#) |
|
Grant
Date
Fair
Value
of
Stock
Awards (5)
($) |
Name |
|
Grant
Date |
|
Threshold
($) |
|
Target
($) |
|
Maximum
($) |
|
|
Threshold
(#) |
|
Target
(#) |
|
Maximum
(#) |
|
|
William F. |
|
|
|
— |
|
1,875,000 |
|
10,000,000 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gifford, Jr. |
|
|
|
— |
|
3,656,250 |
|
24,000,000 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/25/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
50,468 |
|
78,730 |
|
|
|
2,400,041 |
|
|
2/25/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,190 |
|
3,600,018 |
Salvatore |
|
|
|
— |
|
642,865 |
|
10,000,000 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mancuso |
|
|
|
— |
|
1,106,078 |
|
24,000,000 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/25/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
16,928 |
|
26,407 |
|
|
|
805,023 |
|
|
2/25/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,897 |
|
1,207,503 |
Murray R. |
|
|
|
— |
|
878,370 |
|
10,000,000 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garnick |
|
|
|
— |
|
1,512,500 |
|
24,000,000 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/25/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
16,928 |
|
26,407 |
|
|
|
805,023 |
|
|
2/25/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,897 |
|
1,207,503 |
Jody L. |
|
|
|
— |
|
642,865 |
|
10,000,000 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Begley |
|
|
|
— |
|
1,106,078 |
|
24,000,000 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|