UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
REPORT OF
FOREIGN ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the month of February, 2023
Commission file number: 1-10110
BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA, S.A.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
BANK BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA, S.A.
(Translation of Registrants name into English)
Calle Azul 4,
28050 Madrid
Spain
(Address of
principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F:
Form
20-F X
Form 40-F
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is
submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):
Yes
No X
Indicate by check mark if the
registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):
Yes
No X
ANNUAL CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT
OF LISTED COMPANIES
ISSUER IDENTIFICATION
YEAR-END DATE: 31/12/2022
CIF (Código de identificación fiscal Tax Identification
No.) A-48265169
Company Name: BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA, S.A.
Registered Office: 4 Plaza de San Nicolás, 48005 Bilbao, Spain
1
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
ANNUAL CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT
OF LISTED COMPANIES
|
A.1 |
Complete the following table on share capital and the attributed voting rights, including those
corresponding to shares with a loyalty vote as of the closing date of the year, where appropriate: |
Indicate whether company bylaws contain the provision of double loyalty voting:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YES |
|
NO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of approval by the general meeting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of the last modification
of share capital |
|
Share capital (EUR) |
|
Number of shares |
|
Number
of voting rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30/09/2022 |
|
2,954,757,116.36 |
|
6,030,116,564 |
|
6,030,116,564 |
|
|
Indicate whether there are different classes of shares with different
associated rights:
No
|
A.2 |
List the companys significant direct and indirect shareholders at year end, including
directors with a significant shareholding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name or corporate name of the shareholder |
|
% of voting rights attached to
shares |
|
% of voting rights through financial
instruments |
|
Total % of voting rights |
|
|
|
Direct |
|
Indirect |
|
Direct |
|
Indirect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blackrock, Inc. |
|
0.00% |
|
5.48% |
|
0.44% |
|
0.00% |
|
5.92% |
|
|
Details of indirect shareholdings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name or corporate name
of the indirect shareholder |
|
Name or corporate name of the direct
shareholder |
|
% of voting rights attached
to shares |
|
% of voting rights through
financial instruments |
|
Total % of voting
rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicate the most significant changes in the shareholder structure during the
financial year:
2
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
Most significant changes:
As of 31 December 2022, State Street Bank and Trust Co., The Bank of New York Mellon S.A.N.V. and Chase Nominees Ltd., as
international custodian/depositary banks, had custody of 14.88%, 2.12% and 6.84% of BBVAs share capital, respectively. Of said positions held by the custodian banks, BBVA is not aware of any individual shareholders with direct or indirect
holdings greater than or equal to 3% of the BBVA share capital.
On 18 April 2019, Blackrock, Inc. informed the CNMV
(Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores Spanish National Securities Market Commission) that it had an indirect holding of 5.917% of BBVAs share capital, with 5.480% corresponding to voting rights attached to shares and 0.437%
corresponding to voting rights through financial instruments.
|
A.3 |
Detail, regardless of the percentage, the shareholdings as of financial year-end of the members of the board of directors that hold voting rights associated with company shares or through financial instruments, excluding those directors identified in Section A.2 above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name or
corporate name of the director |
|
% of voting rights attached to shares
|
|
% of voting rights through financial
instruments |
|
Total
% of voting rights
|
|
% of voting rights that can be
transferred through financial
instruments |
|
|
|
Direct |
|
Indirect
|
|
Direct
|
|
Indirect
|
|
|
|
Direct
|
|
Indirect
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carlos Torres Vila |
|
0.02 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.02 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Onur Genç |
|
0.01 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.01 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
José
Miguel Andrés Torrecillas |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jaime
Félix Caruana Lacorte |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raúl
Catarino Galamba de Oliveira |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Belén Garijo López |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connie Hedegaard Koksbang |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lourdes Máiz Carro |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
José
Maldonado Ramos |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ana Cristina Peralta Moreno |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Juan Pi Llorens |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ana Leonor Revenga Shanklin |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Susana Rodríguez Vidarte |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carlos Vicente Salazar Lomelín |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan Paul Marie Francis Verplancke |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
|
3
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
|
|
|
|
Total % of voting rights held by members of the board of directors
|
|
0.03% |
|
|
Details of indirect shareholdings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name or
corporate name of the director
|
|
Name or corporate
name of the direct
shareholder |
|
% of
voting rights attached to
shares |
|
% of voting rights through financial instruments
|
|
Total % of voting rights
|
|
% of voting rights that can be transferred through financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Detail the total percentage of voting rights held by the board:
|
|
|
|
|
Total
% of voting rights held by the board of directors |
|
0.00% |
|
|
|
A.4 |
Where applicable, indicate any family, commercial, contractual or corporate relationships
between owners of significant shareholdings, insofar as they are known to the company, unless they are of little relevance or attributable to ordinary trading or exchange activities, except those described in Section A.6:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of related person or company
|
|
Type of
relationship |
|
Brief description
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.5 |
Where applicable, indicate any commercial, contractual or corporate relationships between owners
of significant shareholdings and the company and/or its group, unless they are of little relevance or attributable to ordinary trading or exchange activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of related person or company
|
|
Type of
relationship |
|
Brief description
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.6 |
Describe the relationships, unless they are of little relevance for the two parties, that exist
between significant shareholders or shareholders represented on the board and directors, or their representatives in the case of directors that are legal entities. |
Explain, where applicable, how significant shareholders are represented. Specifically, indicate those directors
appointed to represent significant shareholders, those whose appointment was proposed by significant shareholders or those who are related to significant shareholders and/or their group companies, and specify the nature of the relationships. In
particular, state, where applicable, the existence, identity and position of board membersor their representativesof the listed company who are also membersor representatives of membersof the management body of companies that
hold significant shareholdings in the listed company or in entities that are part of said significant shareholders group.
4
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name or corporate name of
related director or representative |
|
Name or corporate name of related
significant shareholder
|
|
Corporate name of
the company in the significant
shareholders group |
|
Description of relationship/position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.7 |
Indicate whether the company has been informed of any shareholder agreements that may affect it,
as established in Articles 530 and 531 of the Corporate Enterprises Act. Where applicable, briefly describe them and list the shareholders bound by each such agreement: |
No
Indicate whether the company is aware of the existence of concerted actions by its shareholders. If so, describe
them briefly:
No
If any changes to or breaking of any such pacts, agreements or concerted actions have occurred during the financial year, indicate this expressly:
|
A.8 |
Indicate whether any legal entities or natural persons exercise or may exercise control over the
company pursuant to Article 5 of the Securities Exchange Act. If so, identify them: |
No
|
A.9 |
Complete the following table with details of the companys treasury shares:
|
At the close of the year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of direct shares |
|
Number of
indirect shares (*) |
|
Total percentage
of share capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
5,485,414
|
|
0.09%
|
|
|
(*) Through:
|
|
|
|
|
Name or company name of direct shareholder |
|
Number of
direct shares |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporación General Financiera, S.A. |
|
5,454,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
BBVA Seguros, S.A. de Seguros y Reaseguros |
|
30,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total: |
|
5,485,414 |
|
|
Explain any significant changes that have occurred during the financial year:
|
|
|
Explain significant changes |
|
|
In 2022, a total of 10 notifications were filed with the CNMV
regarding treasury shares: eight notifications for purchases exceeding the 1% threshold and two notifications for changes in the number of voting rights. The disclosures were as follows:
Disclosure date: 31/01/2022. A total of 163,844,666 direct shares and
14,834,007 indirect shares, representing a total of 2.680% of the share capital. This disclosure was made after acquisitions passed the 1% threshold.
Disclosure date: 25/02/2022. A total of 229,102,326 direct shares and
2,833,453 indirect shares, representing a total of 3.478% of the share capital. This disclosure was made after acquisitions passed the 1% threshold.
Disclosure date: 09/03/2022. A total of 285,758,976 direct shares and
6,832,618 indirect shares, representing a total of 4.388% of the share capital. This disclosure was made after acquisitions passed the 1% threshold. |
|
|
5
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
|
|
Disclosure date: 18/04/2022. A total of 336,358,765 direct shares and
15,808,564 indirect shares, representing a total of 5.282% of the share capital. This disclosure was made after acquisitions passed the 1% threshold.
Disclosure date: 06/05/2022. A total of 403,310,522 direct shares and
7,713,175 indirect shares, representing a total of 6.164% of the share capital. This disclosure was made after acquisitions passed the 1% threshold.
Disclosure date: 14/05/2022. A total of 471,297,226 direct shares and
7,713,175 indirect shares, representing a total of 7.184% of the share capital. This disclosure was made after acquisitions passed the 1% threshold.
Disclosure date: 17/06/2022. A total of 208,450,968 direct shares and
9,296,551 indirect shares, representing a total of 3.409% of the share capital. The reason for the disclosure was the change in the number of voting rights.
Disclosure date: 22/07/2022. A total of 270,674,497 direct shares and
9,295,518 indirect shares, representing a total of 4.384% of the share capital. This disclosure was made after acquisitions passed the 1% threshold.
Disclosure date: 14/08/2022. A total of 334,160,630 direct shares and
9,295,518 indirect shares, representing a total of 5.378% of the share capital. This disclosure was made after acquisitions passed the 1% threshold.
Disclosure date: 04/10/2022. A total of 285,650 direct shares and
9,295,518 indirect shares, representing a total of 0.159% of the share capital. The reason for the disclosure was the change in the number of voting rights. |
|
|
|
A.10 |
Describe the conditions and term of the current mandate from the general meeting to the board of
directors to issue, buy back or transfer treasury shares. |
|
● |
|
The BBVA General Meeting held on 18 March 2022, under item four of the Agenda, passed a resolution to delegate to
the Board the power to increase share capital for the statutory period of five years up to a maximum amount corresponding to 50% of BBVAs share capital on the date of the authorisation. This can be done on one or several occasions by issuing
new shares of any kind allowed by law, with or without an issue premium, where the countervalue consists of cash consideration. The authorisation includes the setting out of the terms and conditions of the capital increase in any respect not
provided for in the resolution, and the Board is authorised to wholly or partly exclude pre-emptive subscription rights in relation to any share capital increase carried out by virtue of the resolution, in
compliance with the applicable legal requirements. This power was limited insofar as the nominal amount of capital increases agreed or executed with exclusion of pre-emptive subscription rights or to cover the
conversion of convertible issues also excluding pre-emptive subscription rights in use of the power given under the fifth item of the Agenda of the same General Meeting (without prejudice to the anti-dilution
adjustments), described below, do not exceed the maximum nominal amount, in aggregate, of 10% of BBVAs share capital at the time the power was given. To date, BBVA has not adopted any resolution using this delegated power.
|
Likewise, from 1 January 2022 until the aforementioned General Meeting of 18 March 2022, the delegation
adopted at the General Meeting of 17 March 2017, under its third item of the Agenda, was in force. It became ineffective after the approval of the resolution described in the preceding paragraph, without having been used by the Board of
Directors.
|
● |
|
The BBVA General Meeting held on 18 March 2022, under item six of the Agenda, passed a resolution to grant BBVA the
authority, whether directly or through any of its subsidiaries, and for a period of no more than five years, to derivatively acquire BBVA shares as well as their subsequent disposal, by any means permitted by law, noting, in particular, that
(i) the nominal value of the shares acquired by means of this authorisation, in when added to those already owned by BBVA and its subsidiaries, may exceed 10% of BBVAs subscribed share capital, or, where appropriate, any lower limit
established by applicable legislation; (ii) the acquisition price per share may not be lower than the nominal value of the share, and must be under 10% higher than the share price or any other price associated with the shares at the time that
they are acquired. It also authorised that the shares acquired through this authorisation be partially or totally set aside for employees or directors of BBVA or its subsidiaries, either directly or as a result of them exercising any option rights.
|
6
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
Likewise, from 1 January 2022 until the aforementioned General Meeting of
18 March 2022, a similar resolution adopted at the General Meeting of 16 March 2018, under its third item of the Agenda, was in force. It became ineffective after the approval of the resolution described in the preceding paragraph.
These delegated powers were used in the following share repurchase programmes:
At its meeting of 28 October 2021, having received the required authorisation from the European Central Bank, the BBVA Board decided
to carry out a framework programme for the buy-back of own shares in use of this power, in accordance with Regulation (EU) No. 596/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014
on market abuse and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No. 2016/1052 of 8 March 2016 supplementing the previous regulation with regard to regulatory technical standards for the conditions applicable to
buy-back programmes and stabilisation measures. The programme would be implemented in several tranches, for a maximum amount of up to EUR 3.5 billion, with the purpose of reducing BBVAs share
capital. Within the framework programme, the Board resolved to carry out an initial buyback programme for a maximum amount of EUR 1.5 billion and a maximum number of shares to be acquired of 637,770,016 treasury shares. This first programme
began on 22 November 2021 and ended on 3 March 2022, having reached the maximum amount of EUR 1.5 billion with the purchase of 281,218,710 own shares representing close to 4.22% of BBVAs share capital at that date.
On 2 February 2022, the Board of Directors resolved to execute a second share buyback programme for a maximum amount of EUR
2 billion, to be divided into two tranches of up to EUR 1 billion each.
The first tranche of the second programme launched
on 16 March 2022 and ended on 16 May 2022 when the maximum monetary amount of EUR 1.0 billion was reached. A total of 206,554,498 shares were purchased, representing 3.1% of BBVAs share capital at that date.
The second tranche of the second programme began on 28 June 2022 and ended on 19 August 2022, having reached the maximum number
of 149,996,808 own shares, representing close to 2.3% of BBVAs share capital on that date.
These shares were redeemed as
described below.
Continued in Section H of this Report
|
A.11 |
Estimated floating capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
Estimated
floating capital: |
|
93.96% |
|
|
|
|
|
Remarks |
|
|
This estimated floating BBVA capital has been calculated by deducting, from the share capital, the capital held by the direct and indirect holders of significant shares
(Section A.2), the members of the Board of Directors (Section A.3) and the capital held in treasury shares (Section A.9), all as of 31 December 2022, in accordance with the instructions for completing the Annual Corporate
Governance Report. |
|
|
|
A.12 |
Indicate whether there are any restrictions (bylaw-mandated, legislative or of any other kind)
on the transferability of securities and/or any restrictions on voting rights. In particular, report the existence of any restrictions that might hinder the takeover of the company through the purchase of its shares on the market, as well as any
authorisation or prior communication regimes that are applicable to the purchase or transfer of the companys financial instruments as provided by law in the sector. |
Yes
7
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
|
|
Description of the restrictions |
|
|
With regard to the exercise of voting
rights, there are no legal or statutory restrictions. Thus, in accordance with Article 31 of the Bylaws, each voting share will confer the right to one vote on the holder, whether present or represented at the General Shareholders Meeting,
regardless of its disbursement. However, shareholders who are not up to date in the payment of the required outstanding disbursements--but only with respect to shares for which the required outstanding
disbursements have not been paid--and holders of non-voting shares are not entitled to vote.
There are no statutory
restrictions on the acquisition or transfer of shares in the share capital.
As for the legal restrictions on the acquisition or transfer of holdings in the companys share capital,
Spanish Act 10/2014, of 26 June, on the regulation, supervision and solvency of credit institutions (LOSS) establishes that the direct or indirect acquisition of a significant holding (as defined in Article 16 of that Act) in a
credit institution is subject to assessment by the Bank of Spain as set out in Articles 16 et seq. of the Act. Additionally, Article 25 of Royal Decree 84/2015, implementing LOSS (Royal Decree 84/2015), establishes that the Bank of Spain
shall evaluate proposals for acquisitions of significant holdings and submit a proposal to the European Central Bank regarding whether to oppose this acquisition or not. This same article establishes the criteria that should be considered during the
evaluation and the applicable timelines. |
|
|
|
A.13 |
Indicate whether the general meeting has resolved to adopt measures to neutralise a public
takeover bid pursuant to the provisions of Act 6/2007. |
No
If so, explain the measures approved and the terms on which the restrictions would be rendered ineffective:
|
A.14 |
Indicate whether the company has issued securities that are not traded on a regulated market in
the European Union. |
Yes
Where applicable, indicate the different classes of shares and the rights and obligations conferred by each such
class.
|
|
|
Indicate the different classes of shares |
|
|
All the shares in BBVAs share capital
have the same class and series, and confer the same political and economic rights. There are no different voting rights for any shareholder. There are no shares that do not represent capital.
The Banks shares are
admitted to trade on the stock exchanges in Madrid, Barcelona, Bilbao and Valencia, through the Spanish Stock Exchange Interconnection System (Continuous Market), as well as on the stock exchanges in London and Mexico. BBVAs American
Depositary shares (ADS) are traded on the New York stock exchange. |
|
|
B. |
GENERAL SHAREHOLDERS MEETING |
|
B.1 |
Indicate, providing details where applicable, whether there are any differences to the minimum
standards established under the Corporate Enterprises Act (CEA) with respect to the quorum for holding the general meeting. |
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% quorum if different to that established in Art. 193 of the CEA for general cases
|
|
% quorum if
different to that established in Art. 194 of the CEA for special cases
|
|
|
Quorum required on first call |
|
0.00% |
|
66.66% |
|
|
Quorum required on second call |
|
0.00% |
|
60.00% |
|
|
8
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
|
|
Description of the differences |
|
|
Article 194 of the Corporate Enterprises Act
establishes that in order for a general meeting (whether ordinary or extraordinary) to validly resolve to increase or reduce capital or make any other amendment to the bylaws, bond issuance, the suppression or limitation of pre-emptive subscription rights over new shares, or the transformation, merger or spin-off of the company or global assignment of assets and liabilities or the offshoring of
domicile, the shareholders present and represented on first calling must own at least 50% of the subscribed capital with voting rights.
On second calling, 25% of said capital will be sufficient.
Notwithstanding the
foregoing, Article 25 of BBVAs Bylaws requires a reinforced quorum of two-thirds of the subscribed capital with voting rights at first call and, at second call, 60% of such capital for the valid adoption
of the following resolutions: replacement of the corporate purpose, transformation, total spin-off, dissolution of the Company and amendment of the article of the bylaws establishing this reinforced
quorum. |
|
|
|
B.2 |
Indicate, providing details where applicable, whether there are any differences to the minimum
standards established under the Corporate Enterprises Act (CEA) for the adoption of corporate resolutions: |
No
|
B.3 |
Indicate the rules applicable to amending the companys bylaws. In particular, report the
majorities needed to amend the bylaws as well as any rules established to safeguard shareholders rights when amending the bylaws. |
Article 30 of BBVAs Bylaws establishes that the General Shareholders Meeting is empowered to amend the Company Bylaws and to
confirm or rectify the manner in which they are interpreted by the Board of Directors.
To such end, the rules established under
Articles 285 et seq. of the Corporate Enterprises Act shall apply.
The above paragraph notwithstanding, Article 25 of
BBVAs Bylaws establishes that in order to validly adopt resolutions regarding any change to the corporate purpose, transformation, total spin-off or winding up of the Company and amendment of the second
paragraph of said Article 25, two thirds of the subscribed capital with voting rights must attend the General Meeting on first calling, and 60% of said capital on second calling.
As regards the procedure for amending the Bylaws, Article 4.2 c) of the LOSS establishes that the Bank of Spain shall be responsible for
authorising the amendments to the bylaws of credit institutions as set out by regulations.
Further to the above, Article 10 of
Royal Decree 84/2015 stipulates that the Bank of Spain shall make a decision within two months following receipt of the request for amendment of the Bylaws and that said request must be accompanied by certified minutes recording the resolution,
a report substantiating the proposal drawn up by the board of directors and draft new bylaws, identifying the cited amendments.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the aforementioned Article 10 establishes that no prior authorisation from the Bank of Spain is
required, though the latter must be notified for the purposes of entry in the Registro de Entidades de Crédito (Spanish register of credit institutions), for amendments with the following purposes:
|
|
|
Change of the registered office within the national territory. |
|
|
|
Share capital increase. |
|
|
|
Verbatim incorporation into the bylaws of legal or regulatory precepts of a mandatory or prohibitive nature, or for the
purpose of complying with legal or administrative decisions. |
|
|
|
Those amendments for which the Bank of Spain, in response to a prior enquiry made by the affected bank, deems the
authorisation is not required due to their little relevance. |
This notification must be made within 15 working days
following the adoption of the bylaw amendment resolution.
Finally, as a significant entity, BBVA is under the direct supervision of
the European Central Bank (ECB) in cooperation with the Bank of Spain under the Single Supervisory Mechanism, so the authorisation of the Bank of Spain mentioned above will be submitted to the ECB, prior to its resolution by the Bank of Spain.
9
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
B.4 |
Provide data on attendance at general meetings held during the financial year covered in this
report and the previous financial year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attendance data |
|
|
Date of general meeting |
|
% physically present |
|
% present by proxy
|
|
% voting remotely |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Electronic vote |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18/03/2022 |
|
1.03% |
|
48.72% |
|
5.91% |
|
9.64% |
|
65.30% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of
which is floating capital: |
|
1.00% |
|
42.80% |
|
5.91% |
|
9.64% |
|
59.35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20/04/2021 |
|
1.23% |
|
54.90% |
|
7.37% |
|
4.18% |
|
67.68% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of
which is floating capital: |
|
1.21% |
|
45.88% |
|
7.37% |
|
4.18% |
|
58.64% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13/03/2020 |
|
0.06% |
|
47.76% |
|
4.34% |
|
14.67% |
|
66.83% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of
which is floating capital: |
|
0.04% |
|
38.48% |
|
4.34% |
|
14.67% |
|
57.53% |
|
|
|
B.5 |
Indicate whether there were any items on the agenda for the general meetings that took place
during the financial year that were not approved by the shareholders for any reason. |
No
|
B.6 |
Indicate whether there are any restrictions in the bylaws that establish a minimum number of
shares required to attend general meetings or vote remotely: |
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares required to attend general meetings
|
|
500 |
|
|
Number of shares required to vote remotely
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
Remarks |
Article 23 of BBVAs Bylaws establishes that holders of 500 or more shares may attend both annual and extraordinary General Shareholders
Meetings, provided that their shares are registered in the corresponding accounting ledger at least five days before the day on which the Meeting is scheduled, pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act and other applicable provisions, and who conserve
at least that number of shares until the Meeting is held. Holders
of fewer shares may group together until they have at least that number, and name a representative.
However, there is no minimum number of shares required to vote remotely. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of BBVAs Regulations of the
General Shareholders Meeting, shareholders may vote by proxy, by post, electronically or by any other means of remote communication, provided that the shareholder confirms the identity of the person exercising their right to vote. For the
purpose of constituting the General Shareholders Meeting, shareholders who vote remotely will be counted as present. |
B.7 |
Indicate whether it has been established that certain decisions, other than those provided for
by law, involving an acquisition, a disposal, the contribution of essential assets to another company or a similar corporate transaction, must be submitted to the general shareholders meeting for approval. |
No
10
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
B.8 |
Indicate the address and means of access, on the companys website, to information on
corporate governance and other information on general meetings that must be made available to shareholders on the companys website. |
Information relating to corporate governance and the Companys General Meetings can be accessed via the Banco Bilbao Vizcaya
Argentaria, S.A. company website, https://www.bbva.com/en/, in the Shareholders and Investors Corporate Governance and Remuneration
Policy section (https://shareholdersandinvestors.bbva.com/corporate-governance-and-remuneration-policy/).
C. COMPANY MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE
|
C.1.1 |
Maximum and minimum number of directors established in the bylaws and number set by the general
meeting: |
|
|
|
Maximum number of directors |
|
15 |
Minimum number of
directors |
|
5 |
Number of directors set
by the general meeting |
|
15 |
|
Remarks |
In accordance with the provisions of Article 34, Paragraph 2 of the Bylaws, the General Shareholders Meeting of the Bank, held on
18 March 2022, resolved to set the total number of directors on the Board of Directors of Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. at 15. |
|
C.1.2 |
Fill in the following table on the board members: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
or corporate name of the director
|
|
Representative |
|
Type of director
|
|
Position on the board
|
|
Date of first appointment
|
|
Date of
most recent appointment |
|
Election procedure
|
Carlos
Torres Vila |
|
- |
|
Executive |
|
Chair |
|
04/05/2015 |
|
18/03/2022 |
|
Resolution of the General Shareholders Meeting |
Onur
Genç |
|
- |
|
Executive |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
20/12/2018 |
|
18/03/2022 |
|
Resolution of the General Shareholders Meeting |
José Miguel Andrés Torrecillas |
|
- |
|
Independent |
|
Deputy Chair |
|
13/03/2015 |
|
20/04/2021 |
|
Resolution of the General Shareholders Meeting |
Jaime Félix Caruana Lacorte |
|
- |
|
Independent |
|
Director |
|
16/03/2018 |
|
20/04/2021 |
|
Resolution of the General Shareholders Meeting |
Raúl Catarino Galamba de Oliveira |
|
- |
|
Independent |
|
Lead Director |
|
13/03/2020 |
|
13/03/2020 |
|
Resolution of the General Shareholders Meeting |
Belén Garijo López |
|
- |
|
Independent |
|
Director |
|
16/03/2012 |
|
20/04/2021 |
|
Resolution of the General Shareholders Meeting |
11
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connie Hedegaard Koksbang |
|
- |
|
Independent |
|
Director |
|
18/03/2022 |
|
18/03/2022 |
|
Resolution of the General Shareholders Meeting |
Lourdes Máiz Carro |
|
- |
|
Independent |
|
Director |
|
14/03/2014 |
|
13/03/2020 |
|
Resolution of the General Shareholders Meeting |
José Maldonado Ramos |
|
- |
|
Other external |
|
Director |
|
28/01/2000 |
|
20/04/2021 |
|
Resolution of the General Shareholders Meeting |
Ana Cristina Peralta Moreno |
|
- |
|
Independent |
|
Director |
|
16/03/2018 |
|
20/04/2021 |
|
Resolution of the General Shareholders Meeting |
Juan Pi Llorens |
|
- |
|
Independent |
|
Director |
|
27/07/2011 |
|
20/04/2021 |
|
Resolution of the General Shareholders Meeting |
Ana Leonor Revenga Shanklin |
|
- |
|
Independent |
|
Director |
|
13/03/2020 |
|
13/03/2020 |
|
Resolution of the General Shareholders Meeting |
Susana Rodríguez Vidarte |
|
- |
|
Other external |
|
Director |
|
28/05/2002 |
|
13/03/2020 |
|
Resolution of the General Shareholders Meeting |
Carlos Vicente Salazar Lomelín |
|
- |
|
Other external |
|
Director |
|
13/03/2020 |
|
13/03/2020 |
|
Resolution of the General Shareholders Meeting |
Jan Paul Marie Francis Verplancke |
|
- |
|
Independent |
|
Director |
|
16/03/2018 |
|
20/04/2021 |
|
Resolution of the General Shareholders Meeting |
|
|
|
Total number of directors |
|
15 |
Indicate any departures, whether resulting from resignation or resolution of the
general meeting, that occurred on the board of directors during the reporting period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name or corporate
name of the director |
|
Type of
director at the time of
departure |
|
Date of most
recent appointment |
|
Departure date |
|
Specialised committees
of which the director was a
member |
|
Indicate whether the departure
occurred prior to the end of the
term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.1.3 |
Fill in the following tables on the board members and their directorship type:
|
EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name or
corporate name of the director |
|
Position within
the companys organisational structure |
|
Profile |
|
|
Carlos Torres Vila |
|
Chair |
|
Chair of the BBVA Board of Directors.
He was Chief Executive Officer of BBVA from May 2015 to December 2018, Head of Digital Banking from
2014 to 2015 and Head of Strategy and Corporate Development from 2008 to 2014. |
|
|
12
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, he previously
held positions of responsibility in other companies, such as Chief Financial Officer and Director of Corporate Development and member of the Executive Committee of Endesa, as well as Partner at McKinsey & Company.
He completed his studies in Electrical Engineering (BSc) at the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology (MIT), where he also received a degree in Business Administration. He holds a masters degree in Management (MSc) from the MIT Sloan School of Management and also a Law degree from the National Distance Education
University (UNED). |
|
|
Onur Genç |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
Chief Executive Officer of BBVA.
He served as President and CEO of BBVA Compass and as BBVA Country Manager in
the U.S.A from 2017 to December 2018, and served as Deputy CEO and Executive Vice President of retail and private banking at Garanti BBVA between 2012 and 2017.
He has also held positions of responsibility in different McKinsey & Company offices, having previously been a Senior Partner and Manager of
its Turkish office. He holds a degree in Electrical Engineering (BSc) from
the University of Boğaziçi in Turkey and a masters degree in Business Administration (MSIA/MBA) from Carnegie Mellon University in the USA. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of executive directors |
|
2 |
|
|
% of all directors |
|
13.33% |
|
|
EXTERNAL PROPRIETARY DIRECTORS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name or corporate name
of the director |
|
Name or corporate name of the significant
shareholder represented by the director or that
proposed the directors appointment |
|
Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXTERNAL INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
|
|
|
|
|
Name or corporate name of the
director |
|
Profile |
|
|
José Miguel Andrés Torrecillas |
|
Deputy Chair of the BBVA Board of
Directors. He developed his professional
career at Ernst & Young, where he held a range of senior positions, such as Managing Partner of the Banking Group, Managing Partner of Audit and Advisory and Chair of Ernst & Young Spain until 2014.
He has been a member of various organisations
such as the ROAC (Registro Oficial de Auditores de Cuentas official registry of auditors), the REA (Registro de Economistas Auditores registry of accounting auditors), the Junta Directiva del Instituto Español de Analistas
Financieros (Spanish Institute of Financial Analysts Management Board), Fundación Empresa y Sociedad (the Business and Society Foundation), Instituto de Censores Jurados de Cuentas de España (Spanish Institute of Chartered
Accountants), Consejo Asesor del Instituto de Auditores Internos (the Advisory Board of the Institute of Internal Auditors) and the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales (ICAEW). He was director of Zardoya Otis, S.A. until
2022. He holds a degree in Economic and
Business Sciences from the Complutense University of Madrid and has studied at post-graduate level in Management Programs from IESE, Harvard and IMD. |
|
|
13
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
|
|
|
|
Jaime Félix Caruana Lacorte |
|
He is a
member of the Group of 30 (G-30), Sponsor (Patrono) of the Spanish Aspen Institute Foundation, Chair of the Board of the International Center for Monetary and Banking Studies (ICMB) and a member of the
International Advisory Committee of the CBIRC (China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission).
He has been General Manager of the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), Director of the Monetary and Capital Markets Department
and Financial Counsellor and General Manager of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Chair of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Governor of the Bank of Spain and member of the Governing Council of the ECB, among other positions.
He holds a degree in Telecommunications
Engineering from the Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Telecomunicación (ETSIT) of the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid and is a Commercial Technician and State Economist.
|
|
|
Raúl Catarino Galamba de Oliveira |
|
Lead Director
of BBVA. His career has been linked to
McKinsey & Company, where he was appointed Partner in 1995, head of the global financial services practice in 2000. He was Managing Partner for Spain and Portugal (20052011), Managing Partner for Global Risk Practice (20132016),
Member of the Global Shareholders Council (20052011), and Member of the Global Partner Election and Evaluation Committees (20012017). Member of the Remuneration Committee (20052013) and Chair of the Global Learning Board
(20062011). He holds a BSc in
Mechanical Engineering and an MSc in Systems Engineering from the Instituto Superior Técnico (IST) in Portugal, and an MBA from the Nova School of Business Economics, also in Portugal.
|
|
|
Belén Garijo López |
|
Chair of the
Executive Board and CEO of the Merck Group, member of the Board of Directors of LOréal and Chair of the International Pharmaceutical Executive Committee, ISEC (Pharmaceutical Research and Manufactures of America).
She has held various positions of responsibility
at Abbot Laboratories (19891996), Rhône-Poulenc (19961999), Aventis Pharma (19992004), Sanofi Aventis (20042011) and Merck (since 2011).
She is a graduate in Medicine from the University
of Alcalá de Henares in Madrid and a specialist in Clinical Pharmacology at Hospital de la Paz, Autonomous University of Madrid. She also holds a masters degree in Business and Management from the Ashridge Management School (UK).
|
|
|
Connie Hedegaard Koksbang |
|
She is a
member of the Volkswagen Sustainability Advisory Committee, a member of the Board of Trustees of the European Climate Foundation, Chair of the OECD Roundtable on Sustainable Development, a member of the Climate and Environment Advisory Council of
the European Investment Bank (EIB), Chair of the Board of Trustees of the KR Foundation, Chair of CONCITO, Chair of the EU Mission on Adaptation to Climate Change, including Social Change, and Chair of the Board of Aarhus University.
She has held various positions in Danish
government, such as European Commissioner for Climate Action and Minister for the Environment, Climate and Energy and Nordic Cooperation, among others. She has also been a member of the supervisory board of Nordex SE.
She holds a Masters degree in Literature
and History from the University of Copenhagen. |
|
|
Lourdes Máiz Carro |
|
She was
Secretary of the Board of Directors and Director of Legal Services at Iberia, Líneas Aéreas de España until April 2016. She has also been a director of several companies, including Renfe, GIF (Gerencia de Infraestructuras
Ferroviarias Railway Infrastructure Administrator, now ADIF), the ICO ( Official Credit Institution), Aldeasa and Banco Hipotecario.
She worked in Research, giving classes in Metaphysics and Theory of Knowledge at the Complutense University of Madrid for five years.
She became an Attorney for the State and held various positions of responsibility in Public Administration, including General Director of Organisation, among others, General Director of the Sociedad Estatal de Participaciones Patrimoniales (SEPPA)
at the Ministry of Economy and Finance and Technical General Secretary of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.
She holds degrees in Law and Philosophy and Education Sciences as well as a Ph.D. in Philosophy.
|
|
|
Ana Cristina Peralta Moreno |
|
She was
previously Chief Risk Officer and a member of the Bankinter Management Committee, and General Manager of Risks and member of the Banco Pastor Management Committee. She has also held various positions at a number of financial organisations, notably
serving as an independent director at Deutsche Bank SAE, independent director at |
|
|
14
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco
Etcheverría, independent director at Grupo Lar Holding Residencial, S.A.U., and Senior Advisor at Oliver Wyman Financial Services.
She is a graduate in Economic and Business Sciences from Complutense University of Madrid. She also has a masters degree in
Economic-Financial Management from the Centro de Estudios Financieros (CEF), Program for Management Development (PMD) at Harvard Business School and PADE (Programa de Alta Dirección de Empresas senior management programme) at IESE.
|
|
|
Juan Pi Llorens |
|
He has had a
professional career at IBM holding various senior positions at a national and international level, including Vice President of Sales at IBM Europe, Vice President of Technology & Systems at IBM Europe and Vice President of the Financial
Services Sector in the Growth Markets Units (GMU) in China. He was also Executive Chair of IBM Spain.
He holds a degree in Industrial Engineering from the Universidad Politécnica de Barcelona and completed the PDG (Programa en
Dirección General general management programme) at IESE. |
Ana Leonor Revenga Shanklin |
|
Chair of the
Board of Trustees of the ISEAK Foundation and Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution since 2018, member of the Board of Trustees of the BBVA Microfinance Foundation and member of the Advisory Board of ESADE EcPol Center for Economic Policy
and Political Economy since 2019, and Non-resident Professor at Walsh School of Foreign Service, in Georgetown University between 2019 and 2021.
Her career has been linked mainly to the World
Bank, where, after holding several technical and management positions in East Asia and the Pacific, Europe and Central Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean, she has held several leadership positions, including Senior Director of Global
Poverty & Equity (20142016) and Deputy Chief Economist (20162017).
She holds a BA in Economics and Mathematics, magna cum laude, from Wellesley College (USA), an MA and PhD in Economics from Harvard
University (USA), and a Certificate in Human Rights from the Faculty of Law at the University of Geneva (Switzerland). |
Jan Paul Marie Francis Verplancke |
|
Advisor to
the internal consultative board of Abdul Latif Jameel.
His roles have included Chief Information Officer (CIO) and Group Head of Technology and Banking Operations at Standard Chartered
Bank, Vice President of Technology and CIO for EMEA at Dell, as well as Vice President and Chief of Architecture and Vice President of Information of the Youth Category at Levi Strauss.
He holds a degree in Science, specialising in
Computer Science, from the Programming Centre of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in Belgium. |
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of independent directors |
|
10 |
% of all directors |
|
66.67% |
Indicate whether any director considered to be an independent director is
receiving, from the company or its group, any amount or benefit that does not constitute remuneration for serving as a director, or maintains or has maintained, over the last financial year, a business relationship with the company or any company in
its group, whether in their own name or as a significant shareholder, director or senior manager of an entity that maintains or has maintained such a relationship.
Where applicable, include a reasoned statement from the board with the reasons why it deems that this director can
perform their duties as an independent director.
|
|
|
|
|
Name or corporate name
of the director |
|
Description of the relationship |
|
Reasoned statement |
|
|
|
|
|
15
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
OTHER EXTERNAL DIRECTORS
Identify all other external directors and explain why they cannot be considered proprietary or independent
directors, detailing their relationships with the company or its executives or shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name or corporate
name of the director |
|
Reasons |
|
Company, executive or shareholder with
whom the relationship is maintained |
|
Profile |
José Maldonado Ramos |
|
He has been a director for a continuous period of more than 12 years. |
|
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. |
|
Over the course
of his professional career, he has held the positions of Secretary of the Board of Directors at a number of companies, most notably as Corporate General Secretary of Argentaria, before taking up the position of Corporate Secretary of BBVA. He took
early retirement as a Bank executive in December 2009. He
holds a Law degree from Complutense University of Madrid. In 1978, he passed State exams and became an Attorney for the State. |
Susana Rodríguez Vidarte |
|
She has been a director for a continuous period of more than 12 years. |
|
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. |
|
She has been
Professor of Strategy at the Faculty of Economics and Business Administration at the University of Deusto and a non-practising member of the Institute of Accounting and Accounts Auditing.
She was Dean of the Faculty of Economics and Business Administration
at the University of Deusto, Director of the Postgraduate Area and Director of the Instituto Internacional de Dirección de Empresas (INSIDE).
She holds a PhD in Economic and Business Administration from the University of Deusto.
|
Carlos Vicente Salazar Lomelín |
|
Applying a criterion of prudence in the interpretation of the rule, Mr Salazar Lomelín has been assigned the status of
external director to Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A., in view of his membership of the management bodies of companies related to BBVA Mexico for more than 15 years. |
|
Grupo Financiero BBVA Mexico, S.A. de C.V. |
|
Chair of
Mexicos Business Coordinating Council from 2019 to 2022. His
career has been linked mainly to Grupo Fomento Económico Mexicano S.A.B. de C.V. (Femsa), where he was General Manager of Cervecería Cuauhtémoc-Moctezuma, Head of Coca Cola Femsa and
General Manager of Femsa. He participates in a range of
educational institutions and social and business organisations and forums. He has been a professor of economics for more than 40 years at the Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, where he is currently the Chair of the
Business Schools. He holds a degree in Economics and has completed
postgraduate studies in Business Administration at Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education). |
16
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
|
|
Total number of other external directors |
|
3 |
% of all directors |
|
20% |
Indicate any changes that occurred during the period in the type of each director:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name or corporate
name of the director |
|
Date of change |
|
Previous type |
|
Current type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.1.4 |
Fill in the following table with information regarding the number of female directors as of the
end of the last four financial years and the types of such directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of female directors |
|
% of all directors of each type
|
|
|
Financial year 2022 |
|
Financial Year 2021 |
|
Financial year 2020 |
|
Financial year 2019 |
|
Financial year 2022
|
|
Financial Year 2021 |
|
Financial year 2020 |
|
Financial year 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0.00% |
|
0.00% |
|
0.00% |
|
0.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proprietary |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0.00% |
|
0.00% |
|
0.00% |
|
0.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent |
|
5 |
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
3 |
|
50% |
|
40% |
|
40% |
|
37.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other external |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
33.33% |
|
33.33% |
|
33.33% |
|
25% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total: |
|
6 |
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
4 |
|
40% |
|
33.33% |
|
33.33% |
|
26.67% |
|
C.1.5 |
Indicate whether the company has diversity policies in relation to the companys board of
directors with regard to matters such as age, gender, disability or professional training and experience. In accordance with the definition contained in the Spanish Account Auditing Act, small and medium-sized
companies are required to report, at a minimum, the policy that they have established with regard to gender diversity. |
Yes
In
the event the company has them, please outline these diversity policies, their objectives, their measures, the way in which they have been applied and the results thereof in this financial year. Please also indicate any specific measures adopted by
the board of directors and the appointments and remuneration committee to achieve a balanced and diverse representation of directors.
If the company does not have a diversity policy, explain the reasons for this.
Description of the policies, their objectives, their measures, the way in which they have been applied and the results thereof
The Bank has a Policy on the selection, suitability and diversity of BBVAs Board of Directors (the Selection
Policy), approved by the Board of Directors in December 2020, that sets out the principles and criteria governing the process for the selection, appointment and renewal of BBVA Board members, as well as the legal requirements that
directors must meet, including those relating to suitability. The Policy also provides for elements and objectives concerning the composition of the corporate bodies, including diversity, which will be attended to ensure that the corporate bodies
properly exercise their functions and to guarantee their effective functioning in the best interests of the Bank.
17
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
The Selection Policy states that the BBVA Board of Directors will promote diversity in
the composition of the Banks corporate bodies by encouraging the inclusion of people with different profiles, qualities, knowledge, training and experience.
In addition, to ensure that the corporate bodies have an adequate and balanced composition, the Policy ensures that refreshment and
selection processes will encourage diversity of their members, based on the needs of the Bank at all times.
In particular, efforts
will be made to ensure that the Board of Directors has a balanced representation of men and women. To this end, the Appointments and Corporate Governance Committee has set a target for representation of the lesser-represented gender, namely that
female directors should represent at least 40% of the Board of Directors by the end of the 2022 financial year and beyond.
Additionally, the aim is for the composition of the Board of Directors to feature an appropriate balance between the different types of
director, for non-executive directors to represent an ample majority over executive directors and for the number of independent directors to account for at least 50% of the total seats.
Under the Policy, the corporate bodies will also be assessed to ensure that they have a mix of individuals who have experience and
knowledge of the Group, its businesses and the financial sector in general, as well as others who have training, skills, knowledge and experience in other areas and sectors relevant to the Bank.
In addition, BBVAs corporate bodies may take any other diversity factor into consideration that is relevant at any given moment to
accomodate the composition of the corporate bodies to the needs of the Bank, including criteria such as gender diversity, academic profile, professional experience, knowledge, disability, origin or age, thus being able to achieve an adequate balance
aimed at ensuring that the corporate bodies properly exercise their functions and to guarantee their effective functioning.
Continued in Section H of this Report.
|
C.1.6 |
Explain any measures that have been agreed by the appointments committee to ensure that
selection procedures are free from implicit biases that could hinder the selection of female directors and to ensure that the company makes a conscious effort to search for, and includes among its potential candidates, women who match the desired
professional profile in order to achieve a balanced representation of men and women. Further, indicate whether these measures include facilitating a significant number of female senior managers at the company: |
Explanation of the measures
As stated in Section C.1.5, the Board has a Selection Policy that establishes that, with respect to the selection processes for new
Bank directors, as part of the progressive refreshment process of the corporate bodies, the Appointments and Corporate Governance Committee will ensure that they promote diversity and that, in general, they are free from implicit biases that may
lead to discrimination.
Furthermore, the Committee will ensure that these selection processes facilitate the selection of a
sufficient number of female directors so as to guarantee a balanced representation of women and men, endeavouring to ensure that women who match the relevant professional profile are included amongst potential candidates.
As indicated earlier, the Committee set a target for representation of the lesser-represented gender, namely that female directors
should represent at least 40% of the Board of Directors.
In view of the above, as described in sections C.1.5 and H, the
Appointments and Corporate Governance Committee conducted a selection process for directors at the end of 2021, as a result of which the appointment of Connie Hedegaard Koksbang as an independent director was proposed to the 2022 Annual General
Meeting. This made it possible to achieve the goal of having women represent 40% of Board members that year.
18
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
Within the framework of the ongoing analysis of the structure, size and composition of
the Board, the Committee has taken into account that, in the selection process for directors begun in 2022, the target of having at least 40% female directors should be maintained.
These processes have taken into account the criteria outlined in the Selection Policy, favouring the diversity of experiences,
knowledge, skills and gender. It has also been free from implicit bias that could lead to any kind of discrimination, and among the candidates has included women who may meet the desired professional profile.
In addition, it is worth noting that the majority of the members of the Audit Committee and the Remuneration Committee are women,
including the Chair of the Remuneration Committee.
Continued in Section H of this Report.
When, despite the measures taken, there are few or no female directors or senior managers, explain the reasons
therefor:
|
Explanation of the reasons |
|
|
C.1.7 |
Explain the conclusions of the appointments committee regarding the verification of compliance
with the policy aimed at promoting an appropriate composition of the board of directors. |
As part of the
Board assessment process for 2022, the Appointments and Corporate Governance Committee has undertaken an analysis of the structure, size and composition of the Board, in order to ensure that they are suitable for the fulfilment of its functions.
For this purpose, it has taken into consideration, among other issues, the characteristics of the Bank and its Group, which are
reflected in BBVA Groups Purpose and strategy, its corporate culture and values; BBVAs corporate governance system; measures to promote the proper functioning of corporate bodies and the adequate balance of powers; and the evolution
in the structure, size and composition of the Board and its committees as a result of the refreshment process of the corporate bodies, based on tools such as the skills and diversity matrix of the Board, in order to meet the current and
future needs of the corporate bodies.
All of the above, taking into account the regulatory requirements in force and the provisions
and objectives established in the Selection Policy, as described in this document, and considering the different points of view derived from direct contact and dialogue with shareholders, investors, proxy advisors, supervisory authorities and other
stakeholders of the Bank.
As a result of the analysis, the Committee has determined that:
|
|
|
The Board is suitably structured, thus enabling it to perform all the duties assigned to it, facilitating the adequate
functioning of the Board and the efficient and integrated management of the Bank and the Group, and allowing the corporate bodies to perform their decision-making and supervisory and control functions, within a framework that guarantees an
appropriate balance of powers. |
The executive chairmanship model is considered an asset for the Banks
corporate governance, having proven its effectiveness in ensuring the proper functioning of the corporate bodies and efficient management at the executive level, while also allowing the coordination and integration of the Groups executives and
with the corporate bodies. All within the framework of a system based on a precise allocation of duties and a clear separation between the spheres of action of the Chair and the Chief Executive Officer, as well as a differentiated organisational
structure which, together with the structure and operating model of the corporate bodies, ensures the existence of an appropriate separation of powers within the corporate bodies and the Group as a whole.
|
|
|
The Board of Directors is suitably sized, thus also facilitating the performance of its functions and those of its
various committees. |
19
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
|
|
The Board, as a whole, has an adequate and diverse composition with a deep knowledge of the environment, strategy,
activities, business and risks of the Bank and its Group, resulting in a balanced composition that is adapted to the needs of the corporate bodies, thus contributing to ensuring that its functions are performed effectively. Hence:
|
|
o |
The composition of the Board complies with the objectives contemplated in applicable regulations, in its own
Regulations and in the Selection Policy. There is an appropriate balance between the different types of directors, with a large majority of non-executive directors (13 out of 15) and independent directors (10
out of 15). There is a level of gender diversity that meets the targets set by the Board and is in line with best practices and it also has a high diversity of skills, knowledge and experience, both nationally and internationally.
|
|
o |
The diversity of skills, knowledge and experience on the Board has been reinforced as a result of the refreshment
processes of the corporate bodies that have taken place in recent years; where new members joining the Board have strengthened the skills, knowledge and experience of the Board in areas of particular relevance for the management and supervision of
the Bank. In addition, the Board has gradually increased the number of directors with international experience and backgrounds, especially in the markets where the Group is present and carries out its activity. |
|
o |
Board members meet the suitability requirements necessary for the performance of the position, have the availability
and dedication required for the fulfilment of their functions, and receive ongoing training relevant to the performance of their duties. The Board members training programme for 2022 included topics of special interest that helped to
supplement the knowledge of the directors in matters such as sustainability, money laundering and data protection. |
Continued in Section H of this Report.
C.1.8 Where applicable, explain why proprietary directors have been appointed at the behest of shareholders whose holding is less than 3%
of the capital:
|
|
|
Name or corporate name of the shareholder
|
|
Justification |
|
|
|
Indicate whether any formal requests for a seat on the board were denied where
such requests came from shareholders whose interests in the companys share capital were equal to or greater than those of others at whose behest proprietary directors were appointed. Where applicable, explain why these requests were not
granted:
No
|
C.1.9 |
Where applicable, indicate the powers and authority delegated by the board of directors,
including as it relates to potential share issuances or buybacks, to directors or board committees: |
|
|
|
Name or corporate name
of the director or committee |
|
Brief description |
|
|
Carlos
Torres Vila |
|
He holds the widest-ranging representative
and management powers in line with his duties as executive Chair of the Company. |
|
|
Onur
Genç |
|
He holds the widest-ranging representative
and management powers in line with his duties as Chief Executive Officer of the Company. |
|
|
Executive Committee |
|
Pursuant to Article 30 of BBVAs
Regulations of the Board of Directors and Article 1.2 of the Regulations of the Executive Committee, the Executive Committee will be made aware of matters delegated to it by the Board of Directors, in accordance with the law, the Bylaws, the
Regulations of the Board or the Regulations of the Executive Committee.
Moreover, in relation to powers to issue or buy back shares, the Board of Directors of BBVA, at its meeting held on 28 October 2021, resolved to
carry out a framework programme for the repurchase of treasury shares. Within the scope of the framework programme, a first share buyback programme and a |
20
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
|
|
|
|
second programme, which was divided into two segments, would be executed, as agreed at the meeting held on 2 February 2022. It was decided to
delegate to the Executive Committee, with express powers of substitution, the determination of the commencement and termination dates, early termination or temporary suspension, and the final terms, characteristics and conditions. |
|
C.1.10 |
Where applicable, identify any members of the Board who hold positions as directors,
representatives of directors or executives in other companies that belong to the same group as the listed Company: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name or corporate
name of the director |
|
Corporate name
of the group entity |
|
Role |
|
Does the director have executive duties? |
|
|
|
|
Carlos Torres Vila |
|
BBVA México, S.A.,
Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero BBVA México |
|
Director |
|
No |
|
|
|
|
Carlos Torres Vila |
|
Grupo Financiero BBVA México, S.A.
de C.V. |
|
Director |
|
No |
|
|
|
|
Onur Genç |
|
BBVA México, S.A.,
Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero BBVA México |
|
Director |
|
No |
|
|
|
|
Onur Genç |
|
Grupo Financiero BBVA México, S.A.
de C.V. |
|
Director |
|
No |
|
|
|
|
Carlos Vicente Salazar Lomelín |
|
BBVA México, S.A.,
Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero BBVA México |
|
Director |
|
No |
|
|
|
|
Carlos Vicente Salazar Lomelín |
|
Grupo Financiero BBVA México, S.A.
de C.V. |
|
Director |
|
No |
|
|
|
|
Carlos Vicente Salazar Lomelín |
|
BBVA Seguros México, S.A. de C.V.
Grupo Financiero BBVA México |
|
Director |
|
No |
|
|
|
|
Carlos Vicente Salazar Lomelín |
|
BBVA Pensiones México, S.A. de C.V.
Grupo Financiero BBVA México |
|
Director |
|
No |
|
|
|
|
Carlos Vicente Salazar Lomelín |
|
BBVA Seguros Salud México, S.A. de
C.V. Grupo Financiero BBVA México |
|
Director |
|
No |
|
C.1.11 |
Detail the director or director representative roles held by directors or representatives of
members of the board of directors of the company in other companies, whether listed or not: |
|
|
|
|
|
Name
of the director or representative |
|
Corporate name of the entity, whether listed or not
|
|
Role |
|
|
|
Raúl Catarino Galamba de Oliveira |
|
CTT Correios de Portugal, S.A. |
|
Chair |
|
|
|
Raúl Catarino Galamba de Oliveira |
|
José de Mello Capital, S.A. |
|
Director |
|
|
|
Raúl Catarino Galamba de Oliveira |
|
José de Mello Saúde, S.A. |
|
Director |
|
|
|
Belén Garijo López |
|
LOréal Société Anonyme |
|
Director |
|
|
|
Belén Garijo López |
|
Merck KGaA |
|
CEO |
|
|
|
Connie Hedegaard Koksbang |
|
Danfoss A/S |
|
Director |
|
|
|
Connie Hedegaard Koksbang |
|
Cadeler A/S |
|
Director |
21
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
|
|
|
|
Ana
Cristina Peralta Moreno |
|
Grenergy Renovables, S.A. |
|
Director |
|
|
|
Ana Cristina Peralta Moreno |
|
Inmobiliaria Colonial SOCIMI, S.A. |
|
Director |
|
|
|
Juan Pi Llorens |
|
Ecolumber, S.A. |
|
Chair |
|
|
|
Juan Pi Llorens |
|
Oesía Networks, S.L. |
|
Director |
|
|
|
Juan Pi Llorens |
|
Tecnobit, S.L.U. (Grupo Oesía) |
|
Director |
|
|
|
Juan Pi Llorens |
|
UAV Navigation, S.L. (Grupo Oesía) |
|
Director |
|
|
|
Juan Pi Llorens |
|
Inster Tecnología y Comunicaciones, S.A.U. (Grupo Oesía) |
|
Director |
|
|
|
Carlos Vicente Salazar Lomelín |
|
Alsea, S.A.B. de C.V. |
|
Director |
|
|
|
Carlos Vicente Salazar Lomelín |
|
Sukarne, S.A. de C.V. |
|
Director |
|
|
|
Carlos Vicente Salazar Lomelín |
|
CYDSA Corporativo, S.A. de C.V. |
|
Director |
|
|
|
Jan Paul Marie Francis Verplancke |
|
Vestraco S.A.R.L. |
|
CEO |
Indicate, where applicable, all paid activities of any nature engaged in by
directors or their representatives aside from those indicated in the table above:
|
|
|
Name of the director or representative
|
|
Other paid activities |
|
|
Jaime Félix Caruana Lacorte |
|
Teaching of training activities |
|
|
Connie Hedegaard Koksbang |
|
Member of several bodies aimed at driving the transition of economies towards decarbonisation, such as the KR Foundation,
CONCITO (think tank), Kirkbi, OECD Roundtable on Sustainable Development and other related activities |
|
|
Lourdes Máiz Carro |
|
Teaching of training activities |
|
|
Susana Rodríguez Vidarte |
|
Professor Emeritus at the University of Deusto |
|
|
Jan Paul Marie Francis Verplancke |
|
Advisory committee for technology and data of ALJ (Abdul Latif Jameel) |
|
C.1.12 |
Indicate and, where applicable, explain whether the company has established any rules regarding
the maximum number of company boards on which its directors may sit, identifying, where applicable, where such rules are governed: |
Yes
Explanation of the rules and
identification of the document governing the same
Article 11 of the Regulations of the Board of
Directors establishes that, in the performance of their duties, directors will be subject to the rules on limitations and incompatibilities established under the current applicable regulations, and in particular, to the provisions of
Act 10/2014 on the regulation, supervision and solvency of credit institutions (the LOSS).
22
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
In this regard, Article 26 of the LOSS stipulates that the directors of credit
institutions may not simultaneously hold more positions than those provided for in the following combinations: (i) one executive position and two non-executive positions; or (ii) four non-executive positions. Executive positions are understood to be those that undertake management duties irrespective of the legal bond attributed by those duties. In this respect, the following will count as a
single position: 1) executive or non-executive positions held within the same group; 2) executive or non-executive positions held within: (i) entities that are part
of the same institutional protection system; or (ii) companies in which the entity has a significant shareholding. Positions held in non-profit organisations or entities or companies pursuing non-commercial purposes will not count when determining the maximum number of positions. Nevertheless, the Bank of Spain may authorise members of the Board of Directors to hold an additional non-executive position if it deems that this would not interfere with the proper performance of the directors activities in the credit institution.
In addition, pursuant to the provisions of Article 11 of BBVAs Regulations of the Board of Directors, directors may not:
|
|
Provide professional services to companies that compete with the Bank or any of the companies within its Group, or
agree to be an employee, manager or director of such companies, unless they have received express prior authorisation from the Board of Directors or from the General Shareholders Meeting, as appropriate, or unless these activities were
conducted before the director joined the Bank, they posed no effective competition and the Bank had been informed of such at that time. |
|
|
Have direct or indirect shareholdings in businesses or enterprises in which the Bank or companies within its Group
hold an interest, unless that shareholding was held prior to joining the Board of Directors or prior to the Groups acquisition of its holding in such businesses or enterprises, or unless such companies are listed on national or international
securities markets, or unless authorised to do so by the Board of Directors. |
|
|
Hold political positions or perform any other activities that might receive public attention or affect the
Companys image in any way, unless authorised to do so by the Banks Board of Directors. |
|
C.1.13 |
Indicate the amounts of the following items relating to the total remuneration of the board of
directors: |
|
|
|
Remuneration accrued in favour of the board of directors
during the financial year (thousands of euro) |
|
18,802 |
|
|
Amount of funds accumulated by current directors through long-term savings systems with vested economic rights (thousands of
euro) |
|
0 |
|
|
Amount of funds accumulated by current directors through long-term savings systems with
non-vested economic rights (thousands of euro) |
|
22,771 |
|
|
Amount of funds accumulated by former directors through long-term savings systems (thousands of euro) |
|
54,323 |
|
Remarks |
The remuneration included
in the first heading of this paragraph includes: (i) the fixed remuneration received by all directors in 2022; and (ii) in the case of executive directors, the amounts corresponding to the Upfront Portion of the Annual Variable
Remuneration for 2022 financial year, in cash and shares, that was determined following the result of the Annual Performance Indicators established for its calculation, and to the Deferred Annual Variable Remuneration from previous years, in cash
and shares, to be paid in 2023, together with the corresponding update of the portion in cash:
- First payment of the Deferred Portion of the Annual Variable Remuneration for 2021 of executive directors.
- First payment of the Deferred Portion of the Annual Variable
Remuneration for 2019 of executive directors. This remuneration was determined in 2023 following the result of the Multiyear Performance Indicators to which this remuneration was subject.
|
23
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
- Second payment of the Deferred Portion of the Annual Variable
Remuneration for 2018 of the Chair. This remuneration was determined in 2022 following the result of the Multiyear Performance Indicators to which this remuneration was subject.
- Third payment of the Deferred Portion of the Annual Variable
Remuneration for 2017 of the Chair. This remuneration was determined in 2021 following the result of the Multiyear Performance Indicators to which this remuneration was subject. |
|
C.1.14 |
Identify the members of senior management who are not also executive directors, and indicate the
total remuneration accrued in their favour throughout the financial year: |
|
|
|
Name or corporate name |
|
Position(s) |
|
|
María Luisa Gómez Bravo |
|
Global Head of
Corporate & Investment Banking |
|
|
Jorge Sáenz-Azcúnaga Carranza |
|
Country
Monitoring |
|
|
Pello Xabier Belausteguigoitia Mateache |
|
Country Manager
Spain |
|
|
Eduardo Osuna |
|
Country Manager
Mexico |
|
|
David Puente Vicente |
|
Global Head of Client
Solutions |
|
|
Francisco Javier Rodríguez Soler |
|
Global Head of
Sustainability |
|
|
Rafael Salinas Martínez de Lecea |
|
Global Head of
Finance |
|
|
Jaime Sáenz de Tejada Pulido |
|
Head of Global Risk
Management |
|
|
José Luis Elechiguerra Joven |
|
Global Head of
Engineering |
|
|
Carlos Casas Moreno |
|
Global Head of
Talent & Culture |
|
|
Ricardo Martín Manjón |
|
Global Head of
Data |
|
|
Victoria del Castillo Marchese |
|
Global Head of
Strategy & M&A |
|
|
María Jesús Arribas de Paz |
|
Global Head of
Legal |
|
|
Domingo Armengol Calvo |
|
General
Secretary |
|
|
Ana Fernández Manrique |
|
Global Head of
Regulation & Internal Control |
|
|
Joaquín Manuel Gortari Díez |
|
Global Head of Internal
Audit |
|
|
|
Number of women in senior management |
|
4 |
Percentage of all members of senior management |
|
25% |
|
|
|
Total remuneration of senior management (thousands of
euros) |
|
28,698 |
|
C.1.15 |
Indicate whether there have been any amendments to the regulations of the board during the
financial year: |
No
|
C.1.16 |
Indicate the procedures for the selection, appointment,
re-election and removal of directors. Provide details regarding the competent bodies, the procedures to be followed and the criteria to be used in each procedure. |
24
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
Selection, appointment and re-election procedure:
The General Meeting is responsible for appointing and re-electing members of the Board of
Directors, without prejudice to the authority of the Board to co-opt members if a seat falls vacant, in accordance with the terms established in the regulations, the Bylaws, the Regulations of the Board and
the Selection Policy described in Sections C.1.5 and C.1.6.
Proposals for appointment or
re-election of directors submitted by the Board of Directors to the General Meeting, as well as appointments made directly to fill vacancies under its co-opting
authority, will be approved at the proposal of the Appointments and Corporate Governance Committee for independent directors and subject to a report from this Committee for all other directors.
Furthermore, proposals for appointment and re-election must be accompanied by a supporting report
from the Board of Directors assessing the skills, experience and merits of the proposed candidate. Proposals for the appointment or re-election of non-independent
directors must also be accompanied by a report from the Appointments and Corporate Governance Committee.
To this end, said Committee
will evaluate the balance of knowledge, skills and experience on the Board of Directors, as well as the conditions that the candidates must meet to cover vacancies (applicable legal and suitability requirements, inter alia), evaluating the time
commitment considered necessary so that they can carry out their duties, according to the needs of the corporate bodies.
Thus, the
Appointments and Corporate Governance Committee, when it conducts selection processes for directors as part of the of progressive and orderly refreshment process of the corporate bodies, will ensure that the structure and composition of the Board
remains balanced and in line with the needs of the Bank at all times, having directors with different profiles, knowledge, training, experience and skills.
Within these processes, the Committee will further ensure that diversity is promoted and that, in general, there are no implicit biases
that may lead to any form of discrimination.
The Board shall also ensure that these processes facilitate the selection of a
sufficient number of female directors to guarantee a balanced representation of men and women, with the aim that female directors represent at least 40% of the Board by the end of the 2022 financial year (achieved as a result of 2021 selection
process by virtue of which a new female director was proposed to 2023 General Meeting, as independent director), while endeavouring to ensure that women who match the professional profile sought are included amongst potential candidates.
Additionally, the Committee will seek that the composition of the Board of Directors features an appropriate balance between the
different types of director, that non-executive directors represent an ample majority over executive directors and that the number of independent directors accounts for at least 50% of the total seats.
The corporate bodies will also ensure that they have a mix of individuals who have experience and knowledge of the Bank, the Group, its
businesses and the financial sector in general, as well as others who have training, skills, knowledge and experience in other areas and sectors relevant to the Bank.
In any case, BBVAs corporate bodies may take any other relevant diversity factor into consideration to adapt the composition of the
corporate bodies to the needs of the Bank, and they may take into account criteria such as gender diversity, academic profile, professional experience, knowledge, disability, origin or age, in order to achieve an adequate balance.
The persons proposed to be appointed or re-elected as members of the Board of Directors must meet
the requirements set out in current legislation, in the specific regulations applicable to credit institutions, in the Bylaws, in the Regulations of the Board and in the Selection Policy.
In the performance of its functions, the Appointments and Corporate Governance Committee may employ external services to select potential
candidates, when it deems this necessary or appropriate.
25
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
Duration of term and termination:
The directors will hold their position for the term set out in the Bylaws (that is, three years, after which they may be re-elected one or more times for an additional three-year term) or, if they have been co-opted, until the first General Shareholders Meeting has been held. They will
resign from their post when the term for which they were appointed expires, unless they are re-elected.
Directors must also inform the Board of Directors of any circumstances affecting them that could harm the Companys standing and
reputation, and any circumstances that may have an impact on their suitability for their role. Directors must offer their resignation to the Board and accept the Boards decision regarding their continuity in office. Should the Board decide
against their continuity, they are required to tender their resignation, in the circumstances listed in Section C.1.19 below.
In any event, directors will resign from their posts upon reaching 75 years of age and must submit their resignation at the first
meeting of the Banks Board of Directors held after the General Shareholders Meeting approving the accounts for the financial year in which they reach said age.
|
C.1.17 |
Explain the extent to which the annual evaluation of the board has led to significant changes in
its internal organisation and in the procedures applicable to its activities: |
Description of changes
Article 17 of the Regulations of the BBVA Board of Directors establishes that the Board shall assess the quality and efficiency of its
functioning, on the basis of the report submitted to it by the Appointments and Corporate Governance Committee.
Within the
established regulatory framework, the Board of Directors assesses its functioning within the framework of the constant evolution and improvement of BBVAs corporate governance system, so that it remains aligned at all times with the needs of
the corporate bodies, the environment in which the Group operates and regulatory requirements and best practices. This has enabled the corporate bodies to continue to reinforce the various improvement measures approved by the Board over the course
of the past years.
In this context, as part of the Board of Directors annual assessment process carried out in late 2021 and
early 2022 with the participation of Promontory as an independent external consultant, some recommendations and suggestions for improvement were identified by the Board itself and by Promontory.
In 2022, the Board approved a series of improvements to continue with the process of constant evolution of BBVAs corporate
governance system and thus continue to improve its functioning. These focused on matters aimed at strengthening the dynamics and functioning of the meetings of the corporate bodies; increasing the involvement of the Appointments and Corporate
Governance Committee in the succession planning of key function holders; continuing to implement the oversight of the Groups Corporate Governance Policy; and strengthening the integration of the second line of defence within the Regulation and
Internal Control area.
The following conclusions stood out in the assessment process for 2022:
|
● |
The maintenance of a suitable size and composition of the corporate bodies, characterised by a high degree of
independence, balance and diversity in terms of skills, experience and gender, where the achievement of the commitment to have 40% women by 2022 can be highlighted; all on the terms described in sections C.1.5, C.1.6 and C.1.7 above.
|
|
● |
The existence of a robust structure, with a clear separation of functions among the corporate bodies through the
assignment of specific functions to independent directors (Lead Director and Deputy Chair) and to the Board committees, and in the executive sphere, between the Chair and the Chief Executive Officer, and with a differentiated organisational
structure that is completed with the direct reporting to the Board by the heads of control functions, all of which avoids the concentration of power and favours the necessary coordination while providing adequate control mechanisms.
|
26
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
● |
The constant evolution of the functioning of the Board as an ongoing improvement of the Banks corporate
governance system, which in 2022 was achieved through the implementation of several improvement measures approved by the Board, as described, along with others arising from the constant evolution process of the Banks corporate governance
system. These strengthened the functioning and dynamics of the Board, and, in particular, have enabled the corporate bodies to increase the time devoted to issues of particular relevance to the Group, thus fostering productive interactions and
discussions to which sufficient time is devoted. |
|
● |
Fulfilment by the Board of all the functions assigned to it in a suitable manner based on the defined decision-making
and supervision and control models, with a robust reporting model and with the prior support of the Board committees, in accordance with the functions assigned to them in their respective regulations. This also led to a high level of dedication on
the part of the Directors in the performance of their duties. |
Specifically, throughout 2022, the Board of Directors
placed particular attention to issues of significance for the Bank and its Group, to which it devoted more time for review, analysis and discussion. These included the monitoring of the performance of the business and the implementation of the
approved Strategic Plan; the specific monitoring of the Groups technological strategy and technological risks; and the monitoring of the implementation of the Groups sustainability strategy, both at the business and risk management
levels, as well as the progress in the fulfilment of the Banks sustainability commitments.
In the assessment process for 2022,
other areas for improvement were been detected, in relation to which the Appointments and Corporate Governance Committee will propose to the Board the approval and implementation of specific measures to continue advancing in the ongoing improvement
of the Banks corporate governance system.
Describe the evaluation process and the evaluated areas
conducted by the board of directors, assisted, where applicable, by an external consultant, regarding the functioning and composition of the board, its committees and any other area or aspect that was evaluated.
Description of the evaluation process and the areas evaluated
In accordance with Article 17 of the Regulations of the Board of Directors, the Board assesses the structure, size, composition and
quality and efficiency of its operation, based on the report submitted to it by the Appointments and Corporate Governance Committee. It also assesses the performance of the functions of the Chair of the Board on the basis of the report submitted to
it by the Appointments and Corporate Governance Committee. Furthermore, the Board of Directors assesses the performance of the Chief Executive Officer, based on the report by the Appointments and Corporate Governance Committee, which includes the
assessment performed by the Executive Committee. Finally, the Board of Directors also assesses the operation of its committees, on the basis of the reports submitted to it by the latter.
The assessment in relation to 2022 consisted of an in-depth analysis of the quality and
efficiency of the functioning of the Board and its committees and the performance of the duties of the Chair and Chief Executive Officer, by the Appointments and Corporate Governance Committee, as indicated below:
|
● |
The Board of Directors examined the quality and efficiency of its functioning in 2022. For this purpose, it made use
of the work carried out by the Appointments and Corporate Governance Committee, as set out in its report, in which the following issues, among others, were considered in detail: size, structure and composition of the Board, including the executive
chairmanship model, the independence and suitability of the Directors and their degree of dedication, as described in sections C.1.5, C.1.6 and C.1.7; and the operation and performance of functions by the Board in 2022. |
|
● |
The assessment of the performance of the functions of the Chair of the Board of Directors, led by the Lead Director in
accordance with Article 21 of the Regulations of the Board, was carried out by the Board on the basis of the report by the Appointments and Corporate Governance Committee (in accordance with Article 5 of the Regulations of the Committee)
which details the main activities performed by the Chairs in the year. |
|
● |
The assessment of the performance of the functions of the Chief Executive Officer was carried out by the Board on the
basis of the report by the Appointments and Corporate Governance Committee and the assessment carried out in this respect by the Executive Committee (in accordance with Article 17 of the Regulations of the Board) which details the key elements of
the Chief Executive Officers performance for the year. |
27
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
The result of the opinions collected from each director on the above issues, gathered
in the framework of the interviews conducted by the Lead Director - for the non-executive directors - and by the Chair of the Appointments and Corporate Governance Committee - for the executive directors - was
also considered.
In addition, the Board assessed the quality and efficiency of the functioning of each committee on the basis of the
reports submitted by their respective chairs, as described in Section H of this Report.
The aim was to assess the performance
of the Board of Directors based on a combination of elements that would provide Board members with an overall view as to how well the corporate bodies had fulfilled their functions.
|
C.1.18 |
For those financial years in which an external consultant assisted with the evaluation, provide
details of any business relationships that the consultant or any entity in their group maintains with this company or any company in its group. |
The assessment by the Board of Directors in 2022 regarding its quality and functioning, its committees and the performance of the
functions of the Chair of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer was conducted without the support of an independent expert, since the Board did have an independent external expert to assist in the Board assessment process for 2021, in line with
the provisions of the Good Governance Code for Listed Companies, published by the National Securities Market Commission (CNMV).
|
C.1.19 |
Indicate the circumstances under which directors are obliged to resign.
|
In addition to the circumstances established in applicable law, directors will resign from their post when
the term for which they were appointed expires, unless they are re-appointed.
Accordingly,
as set forth in Article 12 of the Regulations of the Board of Directors, directors must offer their resignation to the Board of Directors and accept the Boards decision regarding their continuity in office. Should the Board decide against
their continuity, they are required to tender their resignation, in the following circumstances:
|
● |
When they are affected by circumstances of incompatibility or prohibition as defined under legislation in force, in
the Bylaws or in the Regulations of the Board of Directors. |
|
● |
When significant changes occur in their personal or professional situation that may affect the status under which they
were appointed to the Board. |
|
● |
In the event of serious breach of their duties in the performance of their role as directors; |
|
● |
When, for reasons attributable to them, acting in their capacity as director, serious damage has been done to the
Companys equity, standing or reputation; or |
|
● |
When they are no longer suitable to hold the status of director of the Bank. |
|
C.1.20 |
Are supermajorities, other than those provided for by law, required for any type of decision?
|
No
Where applicable, describe the differences.
|
C.1.21 |
Explain whether there are specific requirements, other than those relating to directors, to be
appointed chairman of the board of directors. |
No
28
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
C.1.22 |
Indicate whether the bylaws or regulations of the board establish an age limit for directors: |
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
Age limit |
|
|
Chairman |
|
- |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
- |
|
|
Director |
|
75 |
|
Remarks |
As stipulated in
Article 4 of the BBVA Regulations of the Board of Directors, directors will resign from their posts, in all circumstances, upon reaching 75 years of age, and must submit their resignation at the first meeting of the Banks Board of Directors
held after the General Shareholders Meeting approving the accounts for the financial year in which they reach said age. |
|
C.1.23 |
Indicate whether the bylaws or regulations of the board establish a limited term or other
stricter requirements for independent directors in addition to those provided for by law: |
No
|
C.1.24 |
Indicate whether the bylaws or regulations of the board of directors establish specific rules
for proxy voting within the board of directors in favour of other directors, how this is carried out and, in particular, the maximum number of proxies that a director may have and whether there are any restrictions as to what types of directors may
be appointed as a proxy, beyond the limitations provided for by law. Where applicable, provide a brief description of these rules. |
Article 5 of the BBVA Regulations of the Board of Directors establishes that directors are required to attend meetings of the corporate
bodies of which they form part, unless they have a justifiable reason for not doing so. Directors will participate in the deliberations, discussions and debates on matters submitted for their consideration and must personally attend the meetings
held.
However, as set forth in Article 26 of the Regulations of the Board of Directors, if it is not possible for a director to
attend a meeting of the Board of Directors, this director may authorise another director to act as their proxy and cast votes on their behalf, by sending a letter or email to the Company with the information needed by the proxy director to follow
the absent directors instructions. Applicable legislation states, however, that non-executive directors may only grant proxy to another non-executive director. In
addition, this same system applies to attendance at meetings of Board of Directors committees.
|
C.1.25 |
Indicate the number of meetings that the Board of Directors has held during the financial year.
In addition, where applicable, indicate how many times the board met without the chairman in attendance. For calculation purposes, the chairman will be deemed to have been in attendance if represented by a proxy provided with specific instructions.
|
|
|
|
Number of board meetings |
|
14 |
Number of board meetings without the chairman in attendance
|
|
0 |
Indicate how many meetings were held by the lead director with the other board
members, without any executive director in attendance or represented:
29
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
Remarks |
BBVAs Board of
Directors has a Lead Director who performs the duties set forth in the applicable legislation, as well as those stipulated by Article 21 of the Regulations of the Board of Directors.
Thus, in the exercise of his
assigned functions, the number of meetings held by the Lead Director in the financial year, as set forth in this section, were as follows:
- Individual and Group meetings with the non-executive directors in order
to elicit their views on how the Lead Director could carry out his functions in a way that could have a positive impact on the Banks corporate governance.
- Individual meetings with all non-executive directors in order to
ascertain their opinions regarding the operation of the Banks corporate bodies and possible suggestions for improvement that may be considered, held on a recurring basis coinciding with Board meetings and always with the aim that each director
hold at least two meetings a year with the Lead Director, besides any other meeting held at any other time if requested by any of the directors.
- In addition to these individual meetings, the meetings promoted by the Lead Director with all the non-executive directors coinciding with each ordinary meeting of the Board of Directors when deemed convenient are also added, as well as the other meetings that all the
non-executive directors hold to discuss in depth the issues that they consider can make the work of the Lead Director more effective and thus facilitate the evolution of BBVAs corporate governance.
- Individual meetings held
with the non-executive directors within the framework of the annual assessment process of the Board and the performance of the functions of the Chair and the CEO, as described in Section C.1.17 above.
Juan Pi Llorens, who held the
position of Lead Director until 28 April 2022, also held periodic meetings and held conversations with the Banks non-executive directors in the performance of his duties; which are also included in
the number of meetings stated above. |
Indicate how many meetings were held by the board committees during the financial
year:
|
|
|
Number of meetings of the executive committee |
|
19 |
|
|
Number of meetings of the audit committee |
|
13 |
|
|
Number of meetings of the appointments and corporate governance committee |
|
6 |
|
|
Number of meetings of the remuneration committee |
|
7 |
|
|
Number of meetings of the risk and compliance committee |
|
22 |
|
|
Number of meetings of the technology and cybersecurity committee |
|
6 |
|
C.1.26 |
Indicate how many meetings were held by the board of directors during the financial year and
provide details on the attendance of its members: |
|
|
|
Number of meetings attended in person by at least 80% of the directors |
|
14 |
|
|
% of in-person attendance of the total number of votes cast during the financial year |
|
98.57% |
|
|
Number of meetings where all directors, or proxies granted with specific instructions, attended in person |
|
14 |
|
|
% of votes cast by directors attending in person and through proxies granted with specific instructions of the total number of votes cast during the
financial year |
|
100% |
|
Remarks |
The Board of Directors
holds monthly ordinary meetings in accordance with the annual schedule of ordinary meetings drawn up before the beginning of the financial year, and extraordinary meetings as often as deemed necessary.
|
|
C.1.27 |
Indicate whether the individual or consolidated annual financial statements that are being
presented to the board for approval have been certified beforehand: |
Yes
Where appropriate, identify the person(s) who has/have certified the companys individual and consolidated
annual financial statements prior to board approval:
Rafael Salinas Martínez de Lecea, Chief Financial Officer
of the Group.
30
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
C.1.28 |
Explain the mechanisms, if any, established by the board of directors to ensure that the annual
financial statements presented by the board of directors to the general shareholders meeting are prepared in accordance with accounting regulations. |
Article 32 of the BBVA Regulations of the Board of Directors specifies that the main task of the Audit Committee, which is composed
exclusively of independent directors, is to assist the Board of Directors in supervising the preparation of the financial statements and public information, as well the relationship with the external auditor and the Internal Audit area.
In this regard, in accordance with Article 5 of the Regulations of the Audit Committee, it is the responsibility of the Audit
Committee to oversee the process of preparing and reporting financial information and submit recommendations or proposals on safeguarding the integrity thereof to the Board of Directors.
It is also the responsibility of the Audit Committee to analyse, prior to their submission to the Board of Directors and in enough detail
to guarantee their accuracy, reliability, sufficiency and clarity, the financial information of the Bank and of its consolidated Group contained in the annual, six-monthly and quarterly reports, as well as in
all other required financial and related non-financial information.
It is also the
Committees responsibility to review the correct application of accounting criteria, as well as all relevant changes relating to the accounting principles used and the presentation of the financial statements, including the accurate demarcation
of the consolidation perimeter.
Similarly, in accordance with Article 5 of the Regulations of the Audit Committee, said
Committee is responsible for overseeing the effectiveness of the Companys internal control and risk management systems in the preparation and presentation of financial information, including fiscal risks.
In the performance of these functions, the Audit Committee maintains direct and ongoing contact with the heads of the area in the Group
responsible for Accounting functions through monthly meetings, monitoring the change over time of the main figures on the Balance Sheet and the Income Statement of the Bank and its Group each month; overseeing the accounting policies, practices and
principles as well as the valuation criteria followed by the Bank and the Group during the process of preparing and submitting the corresponding financial information; and analysing changes made in relation to the main applicable accounting
regulations, as well as the main impacts that their incorporation has had on the financial information of the Bank and its Group. To this end, the Committee had all of the information that it required, with the level of aggregation deemed
appropriate.
In addition, given that the external audit is one of the core elements in the chain of control mechanisms established
to ensure the quality and integrity of the financial information, in accordance with the Regulations of the Audit Committee, it is the Committees responsibility to check, at appropriate intervals, that the external audit schedule of work is
being conducted under the agreed conditions, and that this satisfies the requirements of the competent authorities and the corporate bodies.
Moreover, it will require the auditor to periodicallyat least once a yearprovide an evaluation of the quality of the internal
control procedures regarding the preparation and presentation of the Groups financial information, discussing with the auditor any weaknesses in the internal control system identified during the audit, without undermining its independence, to
then be able to submit recommendations or proposals to the Board of Directors, along with the deadline for their monitoring.
The
Committee will also be apprised of any infringements, situations requiring adjustments or anomalies that may be detected during the external audit and are material in nature, i.e. those that, in isolation or as a whole, could cause significant and
substantive harm to the Groups equity, earnings or reputation; and discernment of such matters will be at the discretion of the auditor which, in the presence of doubt, must report these.
These matters are carefully considered by the Audit Committee, which maintains direct and ongoing contact with the external auditors
through monthly meetings, without the attendance of the Banks executives. At these meetings, the auditors provide detailed information on their work and the results thereof, which enables the Committee to continuously monitor said work and the
conclusions thereof, ensuring that it is performed under optimal conditions and without interference from management.
31
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
C.1.29 |
Is the secretary of the board a director? |
No
If
the secretary is not a director, complete the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name or corporate name of the secretary |
|
Representative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domingo Armengol Calvo
|
|
- |
|
|
C.1.30 |
Indicate the specific mechanisms established by the company to preserve the independence of the
external auditors, and, if any, the mechanisms to preserve the independence of financial analysts, investment banks and rating agencies, including how legal measures have been implemented in practice. |
As set forth in the Regulations of the Audit Committee, the Committees functions, described in the following Section C.2.1, include to
guarantee the independence of the statutory auditor through a dual approach:
|
● |
Avoiding any possibility that the auditors warnings, opinions or recommendations may be adversely influenced. To
this end, the Committee must ensure that compensation for the auditors work does not compromise either its quality or independence, in compliance with the account auditing legislation in force at any given moment. |
|
● |
Establishing incompatibility between the provision of audit and consulting services, unless they are tasks required by
supervisors or the provision of which by the auditor is permitted by applicable legislation, and there are no alternatives on the market that are equal in terms of content, quality or efficiency to those provided by the auditor, in which case,
conformity of the Committee will be required, and this decision may be delegated in advance to its Chair. The auditor will be prohibited from providing unauthorised services outside the scope of the audit, in compliance with the auditing legislation
in force at any given moment. |
This matter is carefully considered by the Audit Committee, which holds meetings with the
auditors representatives at each of the monthly meetings it has, without Bank executives in attendance, to gain a detailed understanding of any issues that may hinder the audit process, the progress and quality of the work carried out, and to
confirm independence in the performance of its work.
The Committee also continually oversees the engagement of additional services to guarantee
compliance with the Regulations of the Audit Committee and with applicable legislation and thus the independence of the auditor, in accordance with the Banks internal procedure established for these purposes.
Moreover, in accordance with the provisions of Point f), Section 4 of Article 529 quaterdecies of the Corporate Enterprises Act and
Article 5 of the Regulations of the Audit Committee, on an annual basis and before the audit report is issued, the Committee must issue a report expressing an opinion on whether the auditors independence has been compromised. This report
must, in all cases, contain a reasoned assessment of the provision of each and every additional service provided to the Group companies, considered individually and collectively, other than the legal audit and those relating to independence or the
regulations on audit activity. Each year, the auditor must issue a report confirming its independence via-à-vis BBVA or entities linked to BBVA, either directly
or indirectly, with detailed and itemised information on any kind of additional services provided to these entities by the external auditor, or by the individuals or entities linked to it, as set out in the consolidated text of the Spanish Account
Auditing Act.
The relevant auditor and Audit Committee reports confirming the auditors independence with respect to the 2022 financial year
have been issued, in compliance with the legislation in force.
In addition, as BBVAs shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, it is
subject to compliance with the Sarbanes Oxley Act and its implementing regulations.
The Board of Directors also has a policy in place for
communication and interaction with shareholders and investors. The policy is governed by the principle of equal treatment for all shareholders and investors, who are in the same position in terms of information, participation and the exercise of
their rights as shareholders and investors, inter alia.
32
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
Moreover, this policy contains the principles and channels established in relation to
shareholders and investors, which govern, where applicable, BBVA relations with other stakeholders, such as financial analysts, Bank asset management companies and custodians, and proxy advisors, among others.
C.1.31 |
Indicate whether the company has changed its external auditor during the financial year. If so,
identify the incoming and outgoing auditors: |
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outgoing auditor |
|
Incoming auditor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KPMG Auditores, S.L. |
|
Ernst & Young, S.L. |
|
|
If there were any disagreements with the outgoing auditor, explain
these disagreements:
No
C.1.32 |
Indicate whether the auditing firm does any other work for the company and/or its group other
than audit work. If so, state the amount of fees received for such work and the percentage that the aforementioned amount represents of the total fees billed to the company and/or its group for audit work: |
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
Group
companies |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
non-audit work (thousands of euros) |
|
3 |
|
58 |
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
non-audit work/total amount billed by the auditing firm (%) |
|
0.02% |
|
0.50% |
|
0.24% |
|
|
C.1.33 |
Indicate whether the audit report on the annual financial statements for the previous financial
year contained qualifications. If so, indicate the reasons given by the chair of the audit committee to the shareholders at the General Meeting to explain the content and scope of such qualifications. |
No
C.1.34 |
Indicate the number of consecutive financial years during which the current auditing firm has
been auditing the individual and/or consolidated annual financial statements of the company. Likewise, indicate the total number of financial years audited by the current auditing firm as a percentage of the total number of years in which the annual
financial statements have been audited: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of consecutive financial
years |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of financial years audited by the
current auditing firm/ number of financial years the company or its group have been audited (%) |
|
4.55% |
|
4.55% |
|
|
C.1.35 |
Indicate whether there is a procedure in place (and provide details, where applicable) whereby
directors are provided with the information they need with sufficient time to be able to prepare for meetings of the management bodies: |
Yes
33
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
Details of the procedure
As set forth in Article 5 of the Regulations of the Board of Directors, prior to the meetings, directors will be provided with the information
needed to form an opinion with respect to the matters within the remit of the Banks corporate bodies, and may ask for any additional information and advice required to perform their duties. They may also ask the Board of Directors for external
expert help for any matters put to their consideration whose special complexity or importance so requires.
These rights will be exercised through
the Chair or Secretary of the Board of Directors, who will attend to requests by providing the information directly or by establishing suitable arrangements within the organisation for this purpose, unless a specific procedure has been established
in the regulations governing the Board of Directors committees.
Furthermore, as set forth in Article 28 of the Regulations of the Board
of Directors, the directors will be provided with such information or clarifications as deemed necessary or appropriate with regard to the matters to be discussed at the meeting, either before or after the meetings are held.
In addition, BBVAs information model ensures that decisions are made on the basis of complete, comprehensive, appropriate and consistent
information, prepared in accordance with common principles so that analyses carried out by the corporate bodies are based on the correct data, thus allowing directors to better perform their duties.
Thus, the Banks corporate bodies have a procedure in place for verifying the information submitted for consideration, coordinated by the
Boards Secretariat with the departments responsible for the information, in order to provide directors with complete, comprehensive, appropriate and consistent information in sufficient time for the meetings of the Banks various
corporate bodies. Prior to such meetings, information is made available to the Banks corporate bodies via an online system, to which all members of the Board have access.
C.1.36 |
Indicate and, where applicable, provide details regarding whether the company has established
rules that require directors to report and, if applicable, resign in the event they are affected by circumstances that, whether or not related to their actions at the company itself, could harm the companys standing and reputation:
|
Yes
Explanation of the
rules
As set forth in Article 12 of the Regulations of the Board of Directors, directors must also inform the Board of Directors of any
circumstances that may affect them and harm the Companys standing and reputation, and any circumstances that may have an impact on their suitability to perform their role.
Directors must offer their resignation to the Board of Directors and accept its decision regarding their continuity in office. Should the Board decide
against their continuing, they are required to tender their resignation when, for reasons attributable to the directors in their status as such, serious damage has been done to the Companys equity, standing or reputation or when they are no
longer suitable to hold the status of director at the Bank, among other circumstances referred to in Section C.1.19 of this report.
C.1.37 |
Indicate, unless there have been special circumstances recorded in the minutes, whether the
board was informed or otherwise came to know of any situation concerning a director, whether or not related to their actions at the company itself, that could harm the companys standing and reputation: |
No
34
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
C.1.38 |
Detail any significant agreements entered into by the company that are coming into force, or
were amended or concluded, as a result of a change in the control of the company stemming from a public takeover bid, and the effects thereof. |
The Company has not reached any significant agreements that are coming into force, or were amended or concluded as a result of a change in the control
of the Company stemming from a public takeover bid.
C.1.39 |
Identify, on an individual basis when referring to directors and in the aggregate for all other
cases, and indicate in detail, any agreements between the company and its directors, managers or employees that provide for severance pay (guarantee or golden parachute clauses) in the event such persons resign or are wrongfully dismissed or if the
contractual relationship comes to an end owing to a public takeover bid or other type of transaction. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of beneficiaries
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficiary type
|
|
Description of the
agreement |
|
|
|
|
56 managers and
employees |
|
The Bank has no severance payment
commitments with directors. As at
31 December 2022, 56 managers and employees are entitled, in accordance with the provisions of their contracts, to a severance payment in the event of leaving on grounds other than their own will, retirement, disability or serious dereliction
of duties. Its amount will be calculated by factoring in their salary and length of service and will not, under any circumstances, be paid in the event of dismissal for misconduct at the employers decision on grounds of the employees
serious dereliction of duties. |
|
|
Indicate whether, in addition to the circumstances provided for by law, these
contracts are required to be communicated to and/or approved by bodies of the company or its group. If so, specify the procedures, the circumstances provided for and the nature of the bodies responsible for such approval or communication:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board of directors |
|
General meeting |
|
|
|
Body that authorises the clauses |
|
Yes |
|
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
YES |
|
NO |
|
|
|
Is the general meeting informed of these clauses? |
|
X |
|
|
|
Remarks |
The Board of Directors approves resolutions relating to the
basic contractual conditions of members of Senior Management, pursuant to the provisions of Article 17 of the Regulations of the Board and at the proposal of the Remuneration Committee, which are hereby notified to the General Meeting through
this Report and through the information contained in the Annual Financial Statements, but does not approve the conditions applicable to other employees. |
C.2 |
Committees of the board of directors |
C.2.1 |
Detail all of the committees of the board of directors, their members and the proportion of
executive, proprietary, independent and other external directors sitting thereon: |
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Role
|
|
Type |
|
|
|
Carlos Torres Vila
|
|
Chair
|
|
Executive
|
Onur
Genç |
|
Member |
|
Executive |
|
|
|
José Miguel Andrés Torrecillas |
|
Member |
|
Independent |
|
|
|
Jaime Félix Caruana Lacorte |
|
Member |
|
Independent |
|
|
|
José Maldonado Ramos |
|
Member |
|
Other
external |
|
|
|
Susana Rodríguez Vidarte |
|
Member |
|
Other
external |
35
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
|
|
% of executive directors |
|
33.33% |
|
|
% of proprietary directors |
|
0% |
|
|
% of independent directors |
|
33.33% |
|
|
% of other external directors |
|
33.33% |
Explain the functions that have been delegated or assigned to this committee, other than those
that have already been described in Section C.1.9, and describe the procedures and organisational and operational rules of the committee. For each of these functions, indicate its most significant actions during the financial year and how it
has, in practice, exercised each of the functions attributed to it, whether by law, in the bylaws or in other corporate resolutions.
Pursuant to Article 30 of BBVAs Regulations of the Board of Directors and Article 1.2 of its own Regulations, the Executive Committee will be made
aware of matters that the Board, as required by law, the Bylaws, the Regulations of the Board or its own Regulations, resolves to delegate to it.
In particular, in accordance with the powers conferred on it by Article 5 of the Regulations of the Executive Committee, the Committee performs the
following functions:
● |
Supporting the Board in its decision-making: |
|
I. |
Regarding strategy: establishment of the bases on which proposals are prepared and prior analysis of proposals
submitted to the Board regarding the Strategic Plan or other strategic decisions such as the Risk Appetite Framework (RAF); prior analysis of the strategic and financial aspects of proposals submitted to the Board regarding corporate transactions
that fall within its decision-making remit; and decision-making or implementation of the mandates which are expressly delegated to it by the Board in these areas, once the decisions within its remit have been adopted. |
|
II. |
Regarding budgets: prior analysis of budget proposals submitted to the Board; decision-making within its remit with
regard to the implementation of the budget approved by the Board; and analysis of deviations from the approved budget. |
|
III. |
Regarding finance: establishment of the bases on which proposals are prepared and prior analysis of proposals
submitted to the Board regarding the funding plan, the capital and liquidity structure and the Banks dividend policy; and decision-making on the implementation of mandates conferred upon it by the Board in these areas. |
|
IV. |
Regarding business risk: analysis of matters relating to business risk in the proposals and plans submitted to the
Board; and, in relation to reputational risk, analysis, assessment and management of relevant issues in this field. |
● |
Prior report on policies to be submitted to the Board and approval of general policies of the Company and its Group: analysis, prior
to their consideration by the Board, of the policies that, in accordance with the law or internal regulations, must be approved by the Board, except for policies relating to issues handled by other Board committees, which will be approved or
reported to the Board beforehand by the appropriate committee. |
● |
Oversight and control of the following matters: (i) Group activity and results; (ii) budgetary monitoring;
(iii) progress of the Strategic Plan, by analysing key performance indicators established for this purpose; (iv) monitoring of the Groups funding and liquidity plan and capital situation, as well as the activities of the Assets and
Liabilities Committee; (v) monitoring of changes in the risk profile and core metrics defined by the Board; (vi) share-price performance and changes in shareholder composition; (vii) analysis of the markets in which the Group
operates; and (viii) progress of projects and investments agreed within its remit, as well as those agreed by the Board within the strategic sphere. |
36
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
● |
Decision-making powers on the following matters: (i) investments and divestments between EUR 50 million and
EUR 400 million, unless they are of a strategic nature, in which case they will be the Boards responsibility; (ii) plans and projects that are considered to be of importance to the Group and that arise from its activities, and
that are not within the remit of the Board; (iii) decisions regarding the assumption of risks that exceed the limits set by the Board, which must be reported to the Board at its first meeting thereafter for ratification; (iv) granting and
revoking of the Banks powers of attorney; (v) proposals for the appointment and replacement of directors in the Banks subsidiaries or affiliates with more than EUR 50 million in equity; and (vi) conformity so that
executive directors may hold management positions in subsidiaries, in which the Bank holds a direct or indirect controlling interest, or in the Groups affiliate companies. |
The Regulations of the Executive Committee set out the operational principles of the Committee and lay down the basic rules of its organisation and
operation.
The Regulations of the Executive Committee specifically provide that the Committee will meet whenever it is called to do so by its
Chair, who is empowered to call the Committee and to set the agenda, and also set out the procedure for calling ordinary and extraordinary meetings.
For the proper performance of its functions, the Committee will have available, where necessary, the reports of the relevant Board committees on matters
within their remits, and may request as a matter of relevance the attendance of the chairs of those committees at its own meetings where such reports are to be dealt with.
Other aspects of the organisation and operation of the Committee shall be dealt with in the Regulations of the Committee itself. All other matters not
provided for in the aforementioned Regulations will be subject to the Regulations of the Board, insofar as they are applicable.
The most
significant actions carried out by the Executive Committee in the 2022 financial year are detailed in Section H of this Report.
AUDIT
COMMITTEE
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Role |
|
Type |
|
|
|
Jaime Félix Caruana Lacorte |
|
Chair |
|
Independent |
|
|
|
José Miguel Andrés Torrecillas |
|
Member |
|
Independent |
|
|
|
Belén Garijo López |
|
Member |
|
Independent |
|
|
|
Lourdes Máiz Carro |
|
Member |
|
Independent |
|
|
|
Ana Cristina Peralta Moreno |
|
Member |
|
Independent |
|
|
|
% of executive directors |
|
0% |
|
|
% of proprietary directors |
|
0% |
|
|
% of independent directors |
|
100% |
|
|
% of other external directors |
|
0% |
Explain the functions that have been assigned to this committee, including, where applicable, any
that are in addition to those provided for by law, and describe the procedures and organisational and operational rules of the committee. For each of these functions, indicate its most significant actions during the financial year and how it has, in
practice, exercised each of the functions attributed to it, whether by law, in the bylaws or in other corporate resolutions.
The main task
of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in overseeing the preparation of the financial statements and public information, and the relationship with the external auditor and the Internal Audit area.
37
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
More specifically, in accordance with the powers assigned to it by Article 5 of the Regulations of the
Audit Committee, and notwithstanding any other functions assigned to it by law, by the Banks internal regulations or by resolution of the Board the Audit Committee is entrusted with the following functions, inter alia:
In relation to overseeing the financial statements and public information:
|
● |
To oversee the process of preparing and reporting financial information and to submit recommendations or proposals to the Board for
safeguarding data integrity. |
|
● |
Analyse, prior to their submission to the Board and in enough detail to guarantee their accuracy, reliability, sufficiency and
clarity, the financial statements of the Bank and of its consolidated Group contained in the annual, six-monthly and quarterly reports, as well as all other required financial and related non-financial information. |
|
● |
Review the necessary consolidation perimeter, the correct application of accounting criteria, and all the relevant changes relating to
the accounting principles used and the presentation of the financial statements. |
|
● |
Monitor the effectiveness of the Companys internal control as well as its risk management systems, in terms of the process of
preparing and reporting financial information, including tax-related risks, and discuss with the auditor any significant weaknesses detected in the internal control system during the audit, without undermining
its independence. |
In relation to the Internal Audit function:
|
● |
Propose the selection, appointment, re-election and removal of the Head of the Internal Audit
function to the Board of Directors; oversee the independence, effectiveness and functioning of the Internal Audit function; analyse and set objectives for the Head of the Internal Audit function and conduct a performance evaluation; ensure that the
Internal Audit function has the necessary material and human resources; and analyse and, where appropriate, approve the annual work plan for the Internal Audit function. |
|
● |
Receive monthly information from the Head of the Internal Audit function regarding the activities carried out by it, and regarding any
incidents and obstacles that may arise, and verify that Senior Management takes into account the conclusions and recommendations of the reports; and also follow up on these plans. |
|
● |
To be aware of the audited units degree of compliance with corrective measures previously recommended by the Internal Audit area
and inform the Board of those cases that may involve a significant risk for the Group. |
In relation to the external audit process:
|
● |
Submit to the Board any proposals for the selection, appointment, re-election and replacement
of the external auditor, taking responsibility for the selection process in accordance with applicable regulations, as well as for the engagement terms, and periodically obtain information from the external auditor on the external audit plan and its
execution, in addition to preserving its independence in the performance of its functions. |
|
● |
Ensure the independence of the auditor: (i) by avoiding any possibility that the auditors warnings, opinions or
recommendations may be adversely influenced, ensuring that compensation for the auditors work does not compromise either its quality or independence; and (ii) by establishing incompatibility between the provision of audit and consulting
services, unless they are tasks required by supervisors or the provision of which by the auditor is permitted by applicable legislation, and there are no alternatives on the market that are equal in terms of content, quality or efficiency to those
provided by the auditor, in which case, agreement by the Committee will be required. |
38
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
● |
Establish appropriate relationships with the external auditor in order to receive information regarding any issues that may pose a
threat to their independence and any other issues related to the account audit process. |
|
● |
Where appropriate, authorise the provision of additional services other than prohibited services, by the auditor or associated persons
or entities, the performance of which is required by applicable regulations in each case, under the terms provided for in auditing legislation. |
|
● |
Issue, on an annual basis and before the audit report is issued, a report expressing an opinion on whether the external auditors
independence has been compromised. This report must contain a reasoned assessment of each of the additional services mentioned in the previous section, considered individually and collectively, other than the legal audit and in relation to the
independence requirements or to the rules governing the account auditing process. |
|
● |
Ensure that the auditor holds an annual meeting with the full Board of Directors to inform it of the work undertaken and developments
in the Companys risk and accounting situations. |
The most significant actions and work carried out by the Audit Committee in
the 2022 financial year, as well as its organisational and operational rules, are detailed in Section H of this Report.
Identify the directors who are members of the audit committee and have been appointed on the basis of their knowledge and
experience of accounting, auditing or both, and specify the date on which the chair of this committee was appointed to the position.
|
|
|
Names of the directors with experience |
|
Jaime Félix Caruana
Lacorte José Miguel Andrés Torrecillas Belén Garijo
López Lourdes Máiz Carro Ana Cristina Peralta Moreno |
|
|
Date of appointment of the chair to the position |
|
29 April 2019 |
APPOINTMENTS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Role |
|
Type |
|
|
|
José Miguel Andrés Torrecillas |
|
Chair |
|
Independent |
|
|
|
Belén Garijo López |
|
Member |
|
Independent |
|
|
|
José Maldonado Ramos |
|
Member |
|
Other external |
|
|
|
Juan Pi Llorens |
|
Member |
|
Independent |
|
|
|
Susana Rodríguez Vidarte |
|
Member |
|
Other external |
|
|
|
% of executive directors |
|
0% |
|
|
% of proprietary directors |
|
0% |
|
|
% of independent directors |
|
60% |
|
|
% of other external directors |
|
40% |
Explain the functions that have been assigned to this committee, including, where applicable, any
that are in addition to those provided for by law, and describe the procedures and organisational and operational rules of the committee. For each of these functions, indicate its most significant actions during the financial year and how it has, in
practice, exercised each of the functions attributed to it, whether by law, in the bylaws or in other corporate resolutions.
39
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
The main task of the Appointments and Corporate Governance Committee is to assist the Board of
Directors in matters relating to the selection and appointment of members of the Board of Directors; the assessment of their performance; the drafting of succession plans; the Banks Corporate Governance System; and the oversight of the conduct
of directors and any conflicts of interest that may affect them.
Notwithstanding any others assigned to it by the law, the internal regulations of
the Bank or by decision of the Board of Directors, the Appointments and Corporate Governance Committee has, among others, the following functions:
|
1. |
To submit to the Board of Directors proposals for the appointment, re-election
or removal of independent directors and to report on proposals for the appointment, re-election or removal of the remaining directors; and, for these purposes, to evaluate the balance of knowledge, skills and
experience on the Board. |
|
2. |
Propose to the Board of Directors the selection and diversity policies for members of the Board.
|
|
3. |
Establish a target for representation of the underrepresented gender on the Board and draw up guidelines on how to
reach that target. |
|
4. |
Analyse the structure, size and composition of the Board of Directors, at least once per year, when assessing its
operation. |
|
5. |
Analyse the suitability of the members of the Board of Directors. |
|
6. |
Review the status of each director each year, so that this may be reflected in this Report. |
|
7. |
Report on proposals for the appointment of Chair and Secretary and, where appropriate, Deputy Chair and Deputy
Secretary, as well as the Chief Executive Officer. |
|
8. |
Submit to the Board of Directors proposals for the appointment, dismissal or
re-election of the Lead Director. |
|
9. |
Determine the procedure for assessing the performance of the Chair of the Board of Directors, the Chief Executive
Officer, the Board of Directors as a whole and the Boards committees, and oversee its implementation. |
|
10. |
Report on the quality and efficiency of the performance of the Board of Directors. |
|
11. |
Report on the performance of the Chair and of the Chief Executive Officer, incorporating for the latter the assessment
made in this regard by the Executive Committee. |
|
12. |
Analyse and arrange the succession of the Chair, the Chief Executive Officer and, where applicable, the Deputy Chair,
in conjunction with the Lead Director in the case of the Chair, and, where appropriate, draft proposals to the Board to ensure that the succession takes place in a planned and orderly manner. |
|
13. |
Review the Boards policy on the selection and appointment of members of the Groups Senior Management, and
file recommendations with the Board when applicable. |
|
14. |
Report on proposals for the appointment and removal of senior managers. |
|
15. |
Regularly review and assess the Corporate Governance System of the Bank and, where applicable, propose to the Board
for its approval or submission at the General Meeting any amendments and updates that would facilitate its development and continuous improvement. |
|
16. |
Ensure compliance with the provisions applicable to directors contained in the Regulations of the Board or in the
applicable laws. |
40
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
The organisational and operational rules and the most significant actions carried out by the
Appointments and Corporate Governance Committee in the 2022 financial year are detailed in Section H of this Report.
REMUNERATION
COMMITTEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Role |
|
Type |
|
|
|
Belén Garijo López |
|
Chair |
|
Independent |
|
|
|
Lourdes Máiz Carro |
|
Member |
|
Independent |
|
|
|
Ana Cristina Peralta Moreno |
|
Member |
|
Independent |
|
|
|
Carlos Vicente Salazar Lomelín |
|
Member |
|
Other external |
|
|
|
Jan Paul Marie Francis Verplancke |
|
Member |
|
Independent |
|
|
|
% of executive directors |
|
0% |
|
|
% of proprietary directors |
|
0% |
|
|
% of independent directors |
|
80% |
|
|
% of other external directors |
|
20% |
Explain the functions that have been assigned to this committee, including, where applicable, any
that are in addition to those provided for by law, and describe the procedures and organisational and operational rules of the committee. For each of these functions, indicate its most significant actions during the financial year and how it has, in
practice, exercised each of the functions attributed to it, whether by law, in the bylaws or in other corporate resolutions.
The main task
of the Remuneration Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in remuneration matters within its remit and, in particular, those relating to the remuneration of directors, senior managers and those employees whose professional activities have a
significant impact on the risk profile of the Group (hereinafter, the Identified Staff), ensuring that the established remuneration policies are observed.
More specifically, in accordance with the powers that are assigned to it by Article 5 of the Regulations of the Remuneration Committee, and
notwithstanding any other functions assigned to it by law, by the Banks internal regulations or by resolution of the Board, the Remuneration Committee broadly performs the following functions:
|
1. |
Propose to the Board of Directors, for submission to the General Meeting, the Remuneration Policy for BBVA Directors,
and also submit to the Board its corresponding report, all in accordance with the terms established by applicable regulations at any given moment. |
|
2. |
Determine the remuneration of non-executive directors, as provided for in the
Remuneration Policy for Directors, and submit the corresponding proposals to the Board of Directors. |
|
3. |
Determine the extent and amount of individual remuneration, rights and compensation of a financial nature, as well as
the other contractual conditions of executive directors, in accordance with the remuneration policy for directors, submitting the corresponding proposals to the Board, so that they may be contractually agreed. |
|
4. |
Determine and propose to the Board the objectives and criteria for measuring the variable remuneration of the
executive directors, and evaluate their degree of achievement. |
|
5. |
Analyse, where appropriate, the need to make ex-ante or ex-post adjustments to variable remuneration, including the application of reduction or recovery arrangements for variable remuneration, submitting the corresponding proposals to the Board, based on the report from
the relevant committees in each case. |
|
6. |
Present an annual report on the remuneration of the Banks directors to the Board of Directors, which will be
submitted to the Annual General Shareholders Meeting, in accordance with the provisions of the applicable law. |
41
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
7. |
Propose to the Board of Directors, and oversee the implementation of, the remuneration policy for senior managers and
other employees of the Identified Staff, including the process of determining the Identified Staff. |
8. |
Propose to the Board of Directors, and oversee the implementation of, the remuneration policy for the Group, which may
include the policy for senior managers and other employees of the Identified Staff, stated in the previous paragraph. |
9. |
Submit to the Board of Directors the proposals for basic contractual conditions for senior managers, including their
remuneration and compensation in the event they leave their role. |
10. |
Directly oversee the remuneration of senior managers and, within the framework of the remuneration model applicable to
Senior Management at any given time, the objectives and criteria for measuring variable remuneration of the heads of the Regulation & Internal Control area and the Internal Audit area, submitting the corresponding proposals to the Board of
Directors, based on those submitted to it in turn by the Risk and Compliance Committee and the Audit Committee, respectively. |
11. |
Ensure compliance with the remuneration policies established by the Company and review them periodically, proposing,
where appropriate, any modifications that it deems necessary to ensure, among other things, that they are adequate for attracting and retaining the best professionals, and that they contribute to long-term value creation and the adequate control and
management of risks, as well as address the principle of equal pay. In particular, the Committee shall ensure that the remuneration policies set out in the Company are subject to internal, central and independent review at least once a year.
|
12. |
Verify the information on the remuneration of directors and senior managers contained in the various corporate
documents, including the Annual Report on the Remuneration of Directors. |
13. |
Supervise the selection of external advisers, whose advice or support is required for the performance of their duties
in remuneration matters, ensuring that any conflicts of interest do not impair the independence of the advice provided. |
The
organisational and operational rules and the most significant actions carried out by the Remuneration Committee in the 2022 financial year are detailed in Section H of this Report.
RISK AND COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Role |
|
Type |
|
|
|
Juan Pi Llorens |
|
Chair |
|
Independent |
|
|
|
Jaime Félix Caruana Lacorte |
|
Member |
|
Independent |
|
|
|
Raúl Catarino Galamba de Oliveira |
|
Member |
|
Independent |
|
|
|
Ana Leonor Revenga Shanklin |
|
Member |
|
Independent |
|
|
|
Susana Rodríguez Vidarte |
|
Member |
|
Other external |
|
|
|
% of executive directors |
|
0% |
|
|
% of proprietary directors |
|
0% |
|
|
% of independent directors |
|
80% |
|
|
% of other external directors |
|
20% |
Explain the functions that have been assigned to this committee and describe the procedures and
organisational and operational rules of the committee. For each of these functions, indicate its most significant actions during the financial year and how it has, in practice, exercised each of the functions attributed to it, whether by law, in the
bylaws or in other corporate resolutions.
42
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
The main task of the Risk and Compliance Committee is to assist the Board in
determining and monitoring the Groups risk control and management policy, including internal risk control and non-financial risks. It also assists the Board in monitoring the Compliance function and
implementing a risk and compliance culture in the Group.
More specifically, in accordance with Article 5 of its Regulations and
notwithstanding any other functions assigned to it by law, by the Banks internal regulations or by resolution of the Board, the Risk and Compliance Committee is entrusted with the following functions:
|
1. |
Analyse, in accordance with the strategic basis set by the Board or the Executive Committee, and submit to the Board
proposals on the Groups risk control and management strategy, including the Groups risk appetite and the establishment of a risk level considered acceptable according to the risk profile and capital at risk, broken down by Group
businesses and areas. |
|
2. |
Propose the policies of control and management of the different risks of the Group, within its scope of competence, in
a manner that is consistent with the Risk Appetite Framework established by the Board. |
|
3. |
Monitor the effectiveness of the Regulation & Internal Control function (which includes, inter alia, the
Compliance, Internal Risk Control and Non-Financial Risk units) and, in particular: (i) propose to the Board the appointment and removal of the individual responsible for the function; (ii) analyse
and establish the objectives of the individual responsible for the function and assess their performance; (iii) ensure that the function has the resources necessary for the effective performance of their function; and (iv) approve the
annual work plan of the function and monitor its fulfilment. |
|
4. |
Receive monthly information from the head of the Regulation & Internal Control function, as well as from the
heads of the Compliance, Internal Risk Control and Non-Financial Risks units, on their activities and on any incidents that may arise, and verify that Senior Management takes into account the findings and
recommendations of their reports. |
|
5. |
Monitor the change over time of the risks faced by the Group and their compatibility with established strategies and
policies, and with the Groups Risk Appetite Framework then in force, and monitor risk-measurement procedures, tools and indicators established at the Group level to obtain a global view of the risks faced by the Bank and the Group; monitor
compliance with prudential regulations and supervisory risk requirements; and analyse measures to mitigate the impact of identified risks, should they materialise. |
|
6. |
Analyse the risks associated with strategic projects or corporate transactions to be presented to the Board or the EC,
within its scope of competence and, where appropriate, submit a report. |
|
7. |
Analyse risk operations that will be submitted to the Board or the Executive Committee for consideration.
|
|
8. |
Examine whether the prices of the assets and liabilities offered to customers take into account the Banks
business model and risk strategy and, if not, submit a plan to the Board aimed at rectifying the situation. |
|
9. |
Participate in the process of establishing the remuneration policy, checking that it is compatible with an adequate
and effective risk management strategy and that it does not offer incentives to assume risks that exceed the level tolerated. |
|
10. |
Check that the Group has the means, systems, structures and resources that are consistent with best practices to
implement their risk management strategy, ensuring that the risk management mechanisms are adequate in relation thereto. |
|
11. |
Provide information on the matters within its competence provided for in law or internal company regulations, prior to
the adoption of the corresponding resolutions by the Board, where relevant. |
|
12. |
Ensure compliance with applicable regulations on matters related to money laundering, conduct on the securities
markets, data protection and the scope of Group activities with respect to competition, and ensure that any requests for action or information made by official authorities on these matters are dealt with in due time and in an appropriate manner.
|
43
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
13. |
Receive information about any breaches of applicable regulations and relevant events that the areas reporting to it
have detected during its monitoring and control operations, and to be informed of relevant issues related to legal risks that may arise in the course of the Groups activity. |
|
14. |
Examine draft codes of ethics and conduct and their modifications, prepared by the corresponding area of the Group,
and give its opinion in advance of the proposals to be drafted to the Corporate Bodies. |
|
15. |
Have knowledge of the reports, submissions or communications from external supervisory bodies, and confirm that the
instructions, requirements and recommendations received from the supervisory bodies are implemented in an appropriate manner in order to correct any irregularities, deficiencies or inadequacies that have been identified. |
|
16. |
To ensure the promotion of risk culture across the Group. |
|
17. |
To supervise the Groups criminal risk prevention model. |
|
18. |
Review and monitor the systems for reporting by employees of possible irregularities in financial information or other
matters. |
The organisational and operational rules and the most significant actions carried out by the Risk and
Compliance Committee in the 2022 financial year are detailed in Section H of this Report.
TECHNOLOGY AND CYBERSECURITY COMMITTEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Role
|
|
Type
|
|
|
|
Carlos
Torres Vila |
|
Chair
|
|
Executive
|
|
|
|
Raúl
Catarino Galamba de Oliveira |
|
Member
|
|
Independent
|
|
|
|
Juan Pi
Llorens |
|
Member
|
|
Independent
|
|
|
|
Ana Leonor
Revenga Shanklin |
|
Member
|
|
Independent
|
|
|
|
Jan Paul
Marie Francis Verplancke |
|
Member
|
|
Independent
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of executive directors |
|
20%
|
|
|
% of proprietary directors |
|
0%
|
|
|
% of independent directors |
|
80%
|
|
|
% of other external directors |
|
0%
|
Explain the functions that have been assigned to this committee and describe the procedures and
organisational and operational rules of the committee. For each of these functions, indicate its most significant actions during the financial year and how it has, in practice, exercised each of the functions attributed to it, whether by law, in the
bylaws or in other corporate resolutions.
The main task of the Technology and Cybersecurity Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in
monitoring technological risk, in managing cybersecurity and in monitoring the Groups technological strategy.
Specifically, in accordance
with Article 5 of the Technology and Cybersecurity Committee Regulations, and notwithstanding any other functions assigned to it by law, by the Banks internal regulations or by resolution of the Board, the Technology and Cybersecurity
Committee shall perform the following functions, which fall into two categories:
44
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
(a) Functions relating to monitoring technological risk and managing cybersecurity,
such as:
(i) Reviewing the Banks exposure to main technological risks, including risks related to information security and
cybersecurity, as well as the procedures adopted by the executive area for monitoring and controlling these exposures.
(ii)
Reviewing the policies and systems for assessment, control and management of the Groups technological infrastructures and risks, including the response and recovery plans in the event of cyberattacks.
(iii) Being informed of business continuity plans regarding technology and technological infrastructure matters.
(iv) Being informed, as appropriate, about: (i) compliance risks associated with information technology; (ii) the procedures
established for identifying, assessing, overseeing, managing and mitigating these risks.
(v) Being informed about any relevant
events that may have occurred with regard to cybersecurity, i.e. events that, either individually or as a whole, may cause significant impact or harm to the Groups net equity, results or reputation.
(vi) Being informed, as required, by the Head of the Technological Security area regarding the activities it carries out, as well as any
incidents that may arise.
(b) Functions related to the Technology Strategy:
(i) Being informed, as appropriate, of the technology strategy and trends that may affect the Banks strategic plans, including
through monitoring general trends in the sector.
(ii) Being informed, as appropriate, of the metrics established by the Group for
management and control in the technological area, including the Groups developments and investments in this area.
(iii) Being
informed, as appropriate, of issues related to new technologies, applications, information systems and best practices that may affect the Groups technological plans or strategy.
(iv) Being informed, as appropriate, of the main policies, strategic projects and plans defined by the Engineering Area.
(v) Report to the Board of Directors and, where appropriate, to the Executive Committee, on matters related to information technologies
falling within its remit.
The organisational and operational rules and the most significant activities carried out by the
Technology and Cybersecurity Committee during the 2022 financial year are detailed in Section H of this Report.
C.2.2 |
Fill in the following table with information on the number of female directors sitting on the
committees of the board of directors as of the end of the last four financial years: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of female
directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial year 2022
|
|
Financial Year 2021
|
|
Financial year 2020
|
|
Financial
year 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
%
|
|
Number
|
|
%
|
|
Number
|
|
%
|
|
Number
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Committee
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
16.66%
|
|
1
|
|
16.66%
|
|
1
|
|
16.66%
|
|
1
|
|
16.66%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Committee |
|
|
|
3
|
|
60%
|
|
3 |
|
60% |
|
3 |
|
60% |
|
3 |
|
60% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appointments and Corporate Governance Committee |
|
|
|
2
|
|
40% |
|
2 |
|
40% |
|
2 |
|
40% |
|
2 |
|
40% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remuneration Committee |
|
|
|
3
|
|
60% |
|
3 |
|
60% |
|
3 |
|
60% |
|
3 |
|
60% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk and Compliance Committee |
|
|
|
2
|
|
40% |
|
2 |
|
40% |
|
2 |
|
40% |
|
1 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology and Cybersecurity Committee |
|
|
|
1
|
|
20% |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
45
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
C.2.3 |
Indicate, where applicable, if there are regulations governing the board committees, where they
may be consulted and any amendments made thereto during the financial year. Indicate whether an annual report on the activities of each committee has been prepared voluntarily. |
All the Committees of the Board of Directors have their own regulations, approved by the Board and available on the Banks
corporate website (https://www.bbva.com/en/), under Shareholders and Investors, Corporate Governance and Remuneration Policy, in the Board
Committees section.
The regulations were not modified during 2022, except for the regulations of the Audit Committee and the
Executive Committee, to indicate that, in significant corporate transactions within the decision-making remit of the Executive Committee, the Audit Committee will be competent to report to the Executive Committee on the same terms as in relation to
transactions in which the power to decide rests with the Board.
In addition, within the framework of the annual performance
assessment process, all the Board Committees have prepared and submitted a report to the Board of Directors detailing the activity carried out by each of them in the exercise of their functions during the 2022 financial year, and which are described
in Section H of this Report, further to Section C.2.1.
D. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS AND INTRA-GROUP TRANSACTIONS
|
D.1 |
Explain the procedure and competent bodies, if any, for the approval of related-party and
intra-group transactions, indicating the general criteria and internal rules of the entity that regulate the obligation of the affected directors or shareholders to abstain and detailing the internal procedures relating to reporting and periodic
control established by the company in relation to related-party transactions whose approval has been delegated by the board of directors. |
The Regulations of the Board of Directors establish that the Board of Directors will be responsible for approving, where appropriate,
transactions between the Company or companies within its Group and directors or shareholders who have, individually or together with others, significant shareholdings, as well as with related persons to them.
In addition, in its capacity as a credit institution, BBVA is subject to specific sectorial regulations which, with regard to
related-party transactions, are governed by Royal Decree 84/2015 of 13 February, implementing Act 10/2014 of 26 June, on the regulation, supervision and solvency of credit institutions, and Bank of Spain Circular 2/2016 of 2 February,
on the supervision and solvency of credit institutions, which completes the adaptation to Spanish law of Directive 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, on the extension of credit and guarantees to members of the Board of Directors and Senior
Management. The foregoing transactions are subject to approval by the Board of Directors and, in the event that the requirements established by the aforementioned applicable regulations are fulfilled, are submitted to the Bank of Spain for
authorisation.
In accordance with applicable sectorial legislation, the Bank has specific internal regulations in this regard,
which specifically govern the process of granting and approving credit risk transactions as described above for members of BBVAs Board of Directors and Senior Management, the approval of which, as indicated, lies with the Banks Board of
Directors, and for related parties.
46
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
Furthermore, the Corporate Enterprises Act provides that the General Meeting will be
responsible for the approval of related-party transactions with an amount or value equal to or greater than 10% of companys total assets according to the last approved annual balance sheet, while the Board of Directors shall be responsible for
the approval of all other related-parties transactions, and may not be delegated transactions except those transactions that fulfil certain requirements contained in the Corporate Enterprises Act.
On the basis of the regulations established by the Corporate Enterprises Act, the Board of Directors resolved to delegate, to those
responsible for certain executive areas of the Bank, the approval of related-party transactions that: (i) are carried out pursuant to contracts with standard terms that are widely applicable to a large number of customers, at prices that are
set on a general basis by the party acting as a supplier of the goods or services in question, where the amount thereof does not exceed 0.5% of the net turnover contained in the most recent consolidated annual financial statements; and (ii) are
carried out between companies that are part of the same group and in the ordinary course of business and on market terms, with transactions with credit risk that, as indicated, have a specific approval procedure that corresponds to the Board of
Directors, being excluded from such delegation.
Similarly, with regard to the approval of delegated related-party transactions, the
Board of Directors approved an internal procedure for periodic reporting and control regarding such transactions to enable the Banks corporate bodies to monitor their fairness and transparency, as well as compliance with applicable legal
requirements, in particular those established in this respect by the Corporate Enterprises Act, the supervision of which will be the responsibility of the Audit Committee which, on a half-yearly basis, will analyse the transactions, if any, approved
on the basis of the delegation conferred.
The regulations established with regard to the handling of possible conflicts of interest
and the rules regarding abstention are described in Section D.6.
|
D.2 |
Individually detail transactions that are significant due to their amount or content entered
into between the company or its subsidiaries and shareholders holding 10% or more of the voting rights or represented on the board of directors of the company, and indicate the competent body for the approval thereof and whether any affected
shareholder or director abstained from voting thereon. If the board is the competent body, indicate whether the proposed resolution was approved by the board without a majority of the independent directors having voted against such proposal:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name or corporate
name of the shareholder or any of its subsidiaries |
|
%
shareholding |
|
Name or corporate
name of the company or subsidiary |
|
Nature of the transaction |
|
Type of
transaction and other information required to evaluate the same |
|
Amount
(thousands of euros) |
|
Approving body |
|
Name of any abstaining significant shareholders or directors |
|
The proposal to the general meeting, where applicable, has been approved by the board without
a majority of the independent directors having voted against the same. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.3 |
Individually detail transactions that are significant due to their amount or content entered
into between the company or its subsidiaries and directors or executives of the company, including transactions entered into with entities controlled or jointly controlled by the director or executive, and indicate the competent body for the
approval thereof and whether any affected shareholder or director abstained from voting thereon. If the board is the competent body, indicate whether the proposed resolution was approved by the board without a majority of the independent directors
having voted against such proposal: |
47
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name or corporate name of the directors or executives or of the entities under their control or joint control |
|
Name or
corporate name of the company
or subsidiary |
|
Relationship |
|
Nature of the transaction and other information required to evaluate the same |
|
Amount (thousands of euros) |
|
Approving body |
|
Name of any
abstaining shareholders or directors |
|
The proposal to the general meeting, where applicable, has been approved by the board without
a majority of the independent directors having voted against the same. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.4 |
Individually detail intra-group transactions that are significant due to their amount or content
entered into between the company and its parent company or other entities belonging to the parents group, including subsidiaries of the listed company, except in cases in which no other related party of the listed company has an interest in
such subsidiaries or where the subsidiaries are wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by the listed company. |
In any event, provide information regarding any intra-group transactions entered into with companies established
in countries or territories considered to be tax havens:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate name of the group company |
|
Brief description of the transaction
and other information required to evaluate the same |
|
Amount
(thousands of euros) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBVA Global Finance LTD. |
|
Current account deposits |
|
3,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBVA Global Finance LTD. |
|
Term account deposits |
|
6,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBVA Global Finance LTD. |
|
Issue-linked subordinated
liabilities |
|
188,066 |
|
|
|
D.5 |
Individually detail transactions that are significant due to their amount or content entered
into between the company or its subsidiaries with other parties considered to be related parties in accordance with the International Accounting Standards adopted by the EU that have not been listed in the previous categories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate name of the related party |
|
Brief description of the
transaction and other information required to evaluate the same |
|
Amount
(thousands of euros) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.6 |
Detail the mechanisms established to detect, determine and resolve possible conflicts of
interest between the company and/or its group, and its directors, executives, significant shareholders or other related parties. |
Articles 7 and 8 of BBVAs Regulations of the Board of Directors regulate issues relating to possible conflicts of interest,
in summary, as follows:
Article 7: Directors must adopt necessary measures to avoid incurring in situations where their
interests, whether on their own account or for that of others, may enter into conflict with the corporate interest and with their duties with respect to the Company, unless the Company has granted its consent under the terms established in
applicable legislation and in the Regulations of the Board of Directors.
Likewise, they must refrain from participating in
deliberations and votes on resolutions or decisions in which they or a related party may have a direct or indirect conflict of interest, unless these are decisions relating to appointment or removal of positions on the management body.
Directors must notify the Board of Directors of any situation of direct or indirect conflict that they or parties related to them may
have with respect to the Companys interests.
Article 8: The duty of avoiding situations of conflicts of interest
referred to in Article 7 above obliges the directors to refrain from, in particular:
48
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
● |
|
Carrying out transactions with the Company, unless these relate to ordinary business, performed under standard
conditions for customers and of minor relevance. Such transactions are deemed to be those whose information is not necessary to provide a true picture of the Companys equity, financial situation and results. |
|
● |
|
Using the name of the Company or invoking their position as director to unduly influence the performance of private
transactions. |
|
● |
|
Making use of corporate assets, including the Companys confidential information, for private ends.
|
|
● |
|
Taking advantage of the Companys business opportunities. |
|
● |
|
Obtaining advantages or remuneration from third parties other than the Company and its Group, associated with the
performance of their position, unless they are mere tokens of courtesy. |
|
● |
|
Engaging in activities on their own account or on behalf of third parties that involve effective actual or potential
competition with the Company or that, in any other way, bring them into permanent conflict with the Companys interests. |
The above provisions will also apply should the beneficiary of the prohibited acts or activities described in the previous sections be a
related party to the director.
However, the Company may dispense with the aforementioned prohibitions in specific cases,
authorising a director or a related party to carry out a certain transaction with the Company, to use certain corporate assets, to take advantage of a specific business opportunity or to obtain an advantage or remuneration from a third party.
When the authorisation is intended to dispense with the prohibition against obtaining an advantage or remuneration from third parties,
or affects a transaction whose value is over 10% of the corporate assets, it must necessarily be agreed by the General Shareholders Meeting.
The obligation not to compete with the Company may only be dispensed with when no damage is expected to the Company or when any damage
that is expected is compensated by the benefits that are foreseen from the dispensation. The dispensation will be conferred under an express and separate resolution of the General Shareholders Meeting.
In other cases, the authorisation may also be resolved by the Board of Directors, provided that the independence of the members
conferring it is guaranteed with respect to the director receiving the dispensation. Moreover, it will be necessary to ensure that the authorised transaction will not do harm to the corporate equity or, where applicable, that it is carried out under
market conditions and that the process is transparent.
Approval by the Board of Directors of the transactions of the Bank or
companies within its Group with directors will be granted, where appropriate, after receiving a report from the Audit Committee.
Since BBVA is a credit institution, it is subject to the provisions of Act 10/2014, of 26 June , on the regulation,
supervision and solvency of credit institutions (LOSS), whereby the directors and general managers or similar may not obtain credits, bonds or guarantees from the Bank on whose board or management they work, above the limit and under the
terms established in Article 35 of Royal Decree 84/2015, implementing the LOSS, unless expressly authorised by the Bank of Spain.
Continued in Section H of this Report.
|
D.7 |
Indicate whether the company is controlled by another entity within the meaning of Article 42 of
the Spanish Commercial Code, whether listed or not, and has, directly or through its subsidiaries, business relations with said entity or one of its subsidiaries (other than those of the listed company) or engages in activities related to those of
any one of them. |
No
49
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
E. |
RISK CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS |
|
E.1 |
Explain the scope of the companys Risk Control and Management System for financial and non-financial risks, including risks of a tax-related nature. |
The BBVA Group has a general risk management and control model (hereinafter, the Model) adapted to its business model, its organisation,
the countries in which it operates and its Corporate Governance System. This allows the BBVA Group to operate within the framework of the risk control and management strategy and policy defined by BBVAs corporate bodies, in which
sustainability is specifically considered, and to adapt to an ever-changing economic and regulatory environment, addressing risk management on a global level in a manner that is adapted to the circumstances at any moment.
This Model, for which the Groups Chief Risk Officer (CRO) is responsible, is applied comprehensively throughout the Group and
consists of the basic elements listed below:
|
I. |
Governance and organisation |
|
II. |
Risk Appetite Framework |
|
III. |
Assessment, monitoring and reporting |
The Group promotes the development of a risk culture that ensures consistent application of the Model within the Group, and that
guarantees that the risk function is understood and internalised at all levels of the organisation.
The Model applies to the
management and control of all financial and non-financial risks of the Group, including tax risks, without prejudice to the fact that, with regard to tax, in addition to the management of this type of risk as
a non-financial risk, BBVA has a tax risk management policy based on an adequate control environment, a risk identification system and a process for the monitoring and continuous improvement of the
effectiveness of the established controls. BBVAs tax risk management and control system complies with the standards established by the UNE 19602 standard. BBVA obtain the certificate of compliance after the required AENOR audit in 2022.
For more information on the basic elements of the Model, see General risk management and control model in the Risk
management chapter of the individual and consolidated Management Reports for the 2022 financial year, of which this Annual Corporate Governance Report forms part by reference.
|
E.2 |
Identify the corporate bodies responsible for the preparation and enforcement of the Risk
Control and Management System for financial and non-financial risks, including tax-related risks. |
With regard to risks, the Board of Directors responsibilities are those relating to establishing the policy for controlling and
managing risk and the oversight and control of its implementation. To that end, the Board of Directors has a Risk and Compliance Committee, and other committees that assist it for reasons of specialty of the subject matter in accordance with the
functions described in Section C.2.1 of this document.
Specifically, the Board of Directors is responsible for establishing the
Groups risk strategy and, in the exercise of this function, determines the risk control and management policy, which is specified as follows: (i) the BBVA Groups Risk Appetite Framework, which includes the Groups risk appetite
statement, containing the general principles of the Groups risk strategy and its target profile, as well as a set of quantitative metrics (core metricswith their respective statementsand metrics by type of risk) originating from
said statement that reflect the Groups risk profile; (ii) the Model; and (iii) the management policy framework for the different types of risk to which the Bank is or may be exposed, which contains the basic principles for managing
and controlling risks consistently throughout the Group and in accordance with the Model and the Risk Appetite Framework.
50
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
Furthermore, within the scope of its risk monitoring, supervision and control
functions, the Board of Directors monitors the change over time of the BBVA Groups risks as well as the risks of each of its main geographical and/or business areas, ensuring their compliance with the BBVA Groups Risk Appetite Framework,
and also overseeing internal information and control systems.
For the implementation of these functions, the Board is supported by
the Risk and Compliance Committee, which, with a global and cross-cutting vision, monitors the change over time of all the Groups financial and non-financial risks and the extent of compliance with
strategies and policies and the Groups Risk Appetite Framework. In addition to this, the Board has assigned other functions regarding non-financial risks to other committees, which supplement the overall
supervision of the Groups financial and non-financial risks by the Risk and Compliance Committee. To ensure that the Risk and Compliance Committee and, ultimately, the Board of Directors have an overview
of the evolution of all risks in the BBVA Group, coordination is carried out between the different Board committees through different reports, in addition to the crossover composition of the Board committees.
At the executive level, the Groups Chief Risk Officer (GRM) is responsible for managing all of the Groups financial risks
with the independence, authority, rank, experience, knowledge and resources required. He is responsible for ensuring, within their scope of functions, that the BBVA Groups risks are managed according to the established model.
For decision-making, the Chief Risk Officer has a governance structure for the role that culminates in a support forum, the Global Risk
Management Committee (GRMC), which is established as the main executive-level committee on the risks within its remit. Its purpose is to develop the strategies, policies, regulations and infrastructures needed to identify, assess, measure and manage
the material risks within its remit that the Group faces in its business activity.
In addition, the chief risk officers of the
geographical and business areas report functionally to the Chief Risk Officer of the Group and report operationally to the head of their geographical and/or business area. This dual reporting system aims to ensure the independence of the local risk
management function from the operating functions, and enable its alignment with the Groups risk-related general policies and goals.
With regard to non-financial risks and internal control, the Group has a Regulation &
Internal Control area that is independent from the other units. This area is under the ultimate responsibility of the Global Head of Regulation & Internal Control, who is also appointed by the BBVA Board of Directors and depends
hierarchically on the corporate bodies, to which reports on the performance of its functions. This area is responsible for proposing and implementing policies related to non-financial risks and the
Groups Internal Control Model. It also includes, amongst others, the Non-Financial Risk, Compliance and Internal Risk Control units.
For more information on the bodies responsible for risk management and control at BBVA, see Governance and organisation in
the General risk management and control model section in the Risk management chapter of the individual and consolidated Management Reports for the 2022 financial year.
As far as tax risk is concerned, the Tax function of the BBVA Group is responsible for establishing the control mechanisms and internal
rules necessary to ensure compliance with current tax regulations, as well as proposing tax strategy to the Board of Directors for their consideration and approval, where appropriate. In addition, the Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing
the tax risks in the process of preparing and presenting financial information, in accordance with the information provided by the Head of the BBVA Groups Tax function to the Committee.
|
E.3 |
Indicate the primary financial and non-financial risks,
including tax-related risks and, to the extent significant, risks derived from corruption (the latter being understood as those within the scope of Royal Decree Law 18/2017) that could impact the achievement
of business objectives. |
BBVA has processes to identify risks and analyse scenarios, enabling dynamic and
advance risk management. These processes are forward-looking to ensure the identification of emerging risks. These processes are forward-looking, to ensure the identification of emerging risks.
51
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
Risks are captured and measured consistently and with methods considered appropriate.
Their measurement includes the design and application of scenario analyses and the application of stress testing, and considers the controls to which the risks are subject.
In this regard, there are a number of emerging risks that could impact the Groups business performance. These risks are organised
into the following large blocks:
|
● |
|
Macroeconomic and geopolitical risks |
|
● |
|
Risks associated with political, economic and social conditions in Turkey |
|
● |
|
Risks associated with pandemics such as COVID-19 |
|
● |
|
Regulatory and reputational risks |
|
● |
|
Business, legal and operational risks |
For more information on these risks, see Risk factors in the Risk management chapter of the individual and
consolidated Management Reports for the 2022 financial year, and the Other non-financial risks chapter of the Non-Financial Information Statement, included in said
Management Reports.
Likewise, amongst the possible crimes included in the criminal prevention model are those related to
corruption, since there are a number of risks that could manifest in a company with characteristics such as those of BBVA. For more information, see Other standards of conduct and Criminal Prevention Model in the
Compliance section, as reflected in the Company chapter of the Non-Financial Information Statement reflected in the Consolidated Management Report for the 2022 financial year.
Moreover, and not having the significant risk character referred to in this paragraph, it should be noted that the Spanish judicial
authorities are investigating the activities of Centro Exclusivo de Negocios y Transacciones, S.L. (Cenyt). Such investigation includes the provision of services to BBVA.
On 29 July 2019, BBVA was notified by the Central Investigating Court No. 6 of the National High Court that was named as an
investigated party (investigado) in the criminal judicial investigation (Preliminary Proceeding No. 96/2017 Piece No. 9, Central Investigating Court No. 6 of the National High Court) for alleged facts which could constitute
bribery, revelation of secrets and corruption. On 3 February 2020, BBVA was notified by the Central Investigating Court No. 6 of the National High Court of the order lifting the secrecy of the proceedings. Certain current and former
officers and employees of the Group, as well as former directors, have also been named as investigated parties in connection with this investigation. BBVA has been and continues to be proactively collaborating with the Spanish judicial authorities,
including sharing with the courts information obtained in the internal investigation hired by the entity in 2019 to contribute to the clarification of the facts. As at the date of this report, no formal accusation against BBVA has been made.
This criminal judicial proceeding is in the pre-trial phase. Therefore, it is not possible at
this time to predict the scope or duration of such proceeding or any related proceeding or its or their possible outcomes or implications for the Group, including any fines, damages or harm to the Groups reputation caused thereby.
Continued in Section H of this Report.
|
E.4 |
Identify whether the company has risk tolerance levels, including for tax-related risks. |
The Groups Risk Appetite Framework, approved by
the Board of Directors, determines the risks and the associated risk levels that the Group is prepared to assume to achieve its objectives, considering the organic development pattern of the business. These are expressed in terms of solvency,
liquidity and funding, and profitability and recurrence of revenue, which are reviewed not only periodically but also if there are any substantial changes in the business strategy or relevant corporate transactions.
The Risk Appetite Framework is expressed through the following elements:
|
● |
|
Risk Appetite Statement: This contains the general principles of the Groups risk strategy and the target risk
profile. |
52
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
● |
|
Statements and core metrics: Derived from the appetite statement, these statements set out the general risk management
principles in terms of solvency, liquidity and funding, profitability and income recurrence. |
|
● |
|
Metrics by risk type: Based on the core metrics and their thresholds, a series of metrics are determined for each type
or risk and adherence to these ensures compliance with the core metrics and the Groups Risk Appetite Statement. |
In addition to this Framework, the general principles for each type of risk as well as the level of management limits, which is defined
and managed by the areas responsible for managing each type of risk are established. This is to ensure that anticipatory risk management respects the established Risk Appetite Framework.
Each significant geographical area has its own Risk Appetite Framework consisting of its local Risk Appetite statement, core metrics and
statements and metrics by type of risk, which should be consistent with those set at the Group level, but adapted to their reality and approved by the corresponding corporate bodies of each entity. This Appetite Framework is supplemented by the
statements for each type of risk and has a limit structure that is in line consistent with the above.
The corporate Risk area
(Global Risk Management) works together with the various geographical and/or business areas to define their Risk Appetite Framework, so that it is coordinated with and integrated into the Groups Risk Appetite Framework, making sure that its
profile is in line with the one defined. Also, for local monitoring purposes, the Chief Risk Officer for the geographical and/or business area will periodically report on the change over time of the local Risk Appetite Framework metrics to its
corporate bodies, as well as, where appropriate, to the appropriate local top-level committees, following a scheme similar to that of the Group, in accordance with its own corporate governance systems.
For more information on the Risk Appetite Framework described above and on its monitoring and management integration, see Risk
Appetite framework in the General Risk management and control model section within the Risk management chapter of the individual and consolidated Management Reports for the 2022 financial year.
|
E.5 |
State what financial and non-financial risks, including tax-related risks, have arisen during the financial year. |
Risk is
inherent to financial activity, and the occurrence of minor and major risks is therefore an inseparable part of the Groups activities. BBVA therefore offers detailed information on the change over time of risks which, by their nature,
continuously affect the Group in carrying out its activity. This information is provided in its annual financial statements (notes 7 and 19 on risk management and tax risks, respectively, in the BBVA Groups Consolidated Annual
Financial Statements; and notes 5 and 17, on the same subject matters, in BBVAs Individual Annual Financial Statements, both for the 2022 financial year) and in the individual and consolidated Management Reports, both for the 2022
financial year (the Risk management chapter and Other non-financial risks chapter of the Non-Financial Information Statement).
|
E.6 |
Explain the response and oversight plans for the primary risks faced by the entity, including tax-related risks, and the procedures followed by the company to ensure that the board of directors responds to any new challenges. |
The BBVA Groups internal control system for its operational risks is based on the best practices developed both in the COSO
(Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission) Enterprise Risk Management Integrated Framework and in the Framework for Internal Control Systems in Banking Organisations drawn up by the Basel Bank for
International Settlements (BIS).
The control model has a system comprising three lines of defence:
|
● |
|
The Groups business and support units constitute the first line of defence. They are responsible for
primary management of current and emerging risks, and implementing control procedures for risk mitigation. They are also responsible for reporting to their business/support unit. |
53
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
● |
|
The second line of defence comprises specialised control units in different areas of risk: Compliance, Legal,
Finance, People, Physical security, Technological security, Information and Data Security, Suppliers, Internal Risk Control and Processes. This line defines the control frameworks in its specialist field, across the entire Entity, and provides
training to areas exposed to risk. It also checks the identification of current and emerging risks carried out by the different business and support units, and the assessment carried out by these units on the adequacy and effectiveness of their
control environments. This second line of defence is in place in all geographical areas in which the Group is present and acts in accordance with standardised practices that come from the corporate units in each of the fields. |
With regard to operational risk, the control activity of the first and second lines of defence is coordinated by the Non-Financial Risks Unit, which is responsible for providing the units with a common internal control methodology and global tools.
The Groups Head of Non-Financial Risks reports on his activities to the Head of Regulation
and Internal Control. Both officers report to the Risk and Compliance Committee and, in the case of the Head of Regulation and Internal Control, also to the Board, to which she reports directly; she also assists the corporate bodies in those matters
in which she is asked to do so.
Moreover, as part of the second line of defence, the Group has a specific Internal Risk Control
unit, within the area of Regulation & Internal Control, which, among other tasks, independently checks and monitors regulations and governance structure, in terms of financial risks, and the application and operation thereof in the area of
Global Risk Management, as well as checking the development and implementation of financial risk management and control processes. It is also responsible for the validation of risk models.
The Groups Head of Internal Risk Control is responsible for the function and reports on its activities and work plans to the Head
of Regulation & Internal Control and to the Risk and Compliance Committee, assisting the Committee in any matters where requested, and in particular checking that the GRM reports presented to the Committee comply with the established
criteria at all times.
In addition, the Internal Risk Control function is global and transversal, covering all types of financial
risks and having specific units in all geographical and/or business areas, with functional dependency on the Groups Head of Internal Risk Control.
The Group also has internal control functions for Financial and Technology Risk, which are part of the Groups second line of
defence. Their heads report directly to the Head of the Regulation and Internal Control area and to the Audit Committee and the Technology and Cybersecurity Committee, respectively, within their own remits, assisting corporate bodies in those
matters in which they are asked to do so.
|
● |
|
The third line of defence is made up of the Internal Audit unit, the head of which reports directly to the Board,
and for which the Group assumes the guidelines of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and of the Institute of Internal Auditors. Its function is to independently and objectively assess the first and second lines of defence, evaluating the
efficiency and effectiveness of internal control policies and systems, risk management and the governance processes and policies established by the Group. |
As far as tax risk is concerned, the Tax Department, located within the Finance area, is responsible for establishing the policies and
controls necessary to ensure compliance at all times with the current tax regulations and the tax strategy approved by the Board. The Internal Financial Control Unit, as a second line of defence against financial, accounting and tax risks, is
responsible for assessing the quality of the design and effectiveness of the control model operating in tax processes, as detailed in Section F of this document.
Continued in Section H of this Report.
54
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
F. INTERNAL CONTROL AND RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING (ICFR)
Describe the mechanisms comprising the risk management and control systems for financial reporting (ICFR) in your entity.
F.1 The entitys control environment
Give information on the main features of at least:
F.1.1. |
Which bodies and/or functions are responsible for: (i) the existence and maintenance
of an adequate and effective ICFR; (ii) the implementation thereof and (iii) oversight thereof. |
Pursuant to Article 17 of its Regulations, the Board of Directors approves the financial information that BBVA is required to
publish periodically as a listed company. The Board of Directors has an Audit Committee whose main task, among others, is to assist the Board in monitoring the preparation of financial statements and public information, as well as monitoring
internal control of financial information.
In this regard, the Rules of Procedure of BBVAs Audit Committee establish that one
of the Committees functions is to monitor the effectiveness of the Companys internal control and the risk management systems in the process of drawing up and presenting financial information, including tax risks, as well as discussing
with the statutory auditor the significant weaknesses of the internal control system detected during the audit.
The BBVA Group
complies with the requirements imposed by the Sarbanes Oxley Act (SOX) for each financial years consolidated annual financial statements due to its status as a publicly traded company listed with the United States Securities Exchange
Commission (SEC). The main Group executives are involved in the design, compliance and maintenance of an effective internal control model that guarantees the quality and veracity of the financial information. The Finance area has been responsible
during 2022 for producing the consolidated annual financial statements and the BBVA, S.A. financial statements and maintaining the control model for financial information generation. Specifically, this function is performed by the Financial Internal
Control area (Finance - Risk Control Specialist), which is integrated within the Groups general internal control model, which is briefly outlined below:
The BBVA Group works continuously to bolster its internal control model, which comprises two key elements. The first is the control
structure organised into three lines of defence, which is described in Section E.6 above; and the second is a governance scheme called Corporate Assurance, which establishes a framework for monitoring the internal control model and bringing the
main aspects of the Groups internal control to the attention of Senior Management.
Corporate Assurance establishes a committee
structure, both at the local and corporate levels, that provides Senior Management with a comprehensive and homogeneous view of the main non-financial risks and relevant situations as regards the control
environment. The aim is to facilitate fast and proactive decision-making in relation to the mitigation or assumption of major risks. These committees are formed by the main executives responsible for the business and support areas, as well as those
responsible for the second line of defence.
The effectiveness of this internal control system is assessed periodically for those
risks that may affect the correct compilation of the Groups financial statements. This assessment is carried out under the coordination of the Internal Financial Control area (within the control model of the Group is the specialist area of
risk mitigation in the processes of financial information elaboration: Risk Control Specialist RCS Finance in collaboration with the other risk specialists (RCS) located in the second line of defence, as well as with those responsible of the
control (RCA: Risk Control Assurer) of the of the main processes, both in the business and support areas, located in the first line of defence of the control model.
The Groups Internal Audit area also performs its own assessment of the internal control system with regard to the generation of
financial information.
In addition, the external auditor of the BBVA Group issues an opinion every year on the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting based on criteria established by COSO (Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission) and in accordance with PCAOB (the US Public Company Accounting Oversight Board). This opinion appears
in Form 20-F, which is filed every year with the SEC.
The result of the annual internal
assessment of the System of Internal Control over Financial Reporting, conducted by Internal Audit and Internal Financial Control, is reported to the Audit Committee by the heads of Internal Financial Control - RCS Finance.
55
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
F.1.2. |
Whether, especially in the process of preparing financial information, the following
elements exist: |
|
● |
|
Departments and/or mechanisms responsible for: (i) designing and reviewing the organisational
structure; (ii) clearly defining lines of responsibility and authority, with an adequate distribution of tasks and functions; and (iii) ensuring that sufficient procedures exist to properly disseminate them within the entity.
|
Financial information is produced in the local Financial Management Units of the BBVA Group banks in the
different countries where it maintains a presence. The consolidation work is carried out in the Corporate Centre, in the Finance Department, which has overall responsibility for the preparation and issuance of the Groups financial and
regulatory information.
BBVAs organisational structure clearly defines lines of action and responsibility for the areas
involved in the generation of financial information, both at the individual entity level and consolidated Group level, and also provides the channels and circuits necessary for the proper communication thereof. The units responsible for drawing up
these financial statements have a suitable distribution of tasks and the necessary segregation of functions to draw up these statements in an appropriate operational and control framework.
Additionally, there is an accountability model aimed at extending the culture of, and commitment to, internal control and compliance
therewith. Those in charge of the design and operation of the processes that have an impact on financial reporting certify that all the controls associated with its operation under their responsibility are sufficient and have worked correctly.
|
● |
|
Code of conduct, approval body, degree of dissemination and instruction, principles and values
included (indicating whether there are specific references to recording transactions and preparing financial information), body charged with analysing non-compliance and proposing corrective measures and
sanctions. |
BBVA has a Code of Conduct, approved by the Board of Directors, which sets out the behaviour
guidelines that BBVA members must follow in their professional activity.
In February 2022, the Board of Directors approved an
update of BBVAs Code of Conduct to align it with new developments in the business and the environment in which BBVA operates and to meet the expectations of the communities in which the Group is present.
The new version of the Code of Conduct, the previous version of which dated July 2015, was communicated to all BBVA employees and is
published on the Banks website (https://www.bbva.com/en/) and on the employees website (intranet).
BBVA has an online training course on the Code of Conduct at the global level, with scope for the entire Group staff, including key
staff in the financial function and new recruits. In addition, communication campaigns are developed periodically and new content is disseminated in connection with the Code of Conduct, taking advantage of new digital formats and channels.
In November 2022, in order to reinforce awareness and knowledge of the Code of Conduct among the workforce, a new corporate Code of
Conduct course was published, which all BBVA employees are required to complete. This course includes, among other novelties, messages from members of Senior Management on different aspects of conduct to be taken into consideration in the daily
activities of BBVA employees. This demonstrates the commitment and importance that the Banks Senior Management attaches to maintaining a high corporate culture of compliance in the entity (tone from the top).
The Code also establishes a Whistleblowing Channel where behaviours that deviate from the Code of Conduct or violate the law or internal
regulations can be reported.
One of the functions of the Risk and Compliance Committee is to examine draft codes of ethics and
conduct and their respective modifications prepared by the corresponding area of the Group, and give its opinion in advance of the proposals to be drafted to the corporate bodies.
56
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
Additionally, BBVA has adopted a structure of Corporate Integrity Management
Committees (with individual powers at the jurisdictional level). Their joint scope of action covers all the Group businesses and activities and their main function is to ensure effective application of the Code of Conduct. There is also a Corporate
Integrity Management Committee, which is global in scope for the whole of BBVA.
For its part, the Compliance function is entrusted
by the Board of Directors with the task of independently and objectively promoting and monitoring integrity of action within the BBVA Group, particularly regarding activities that may involve the risk of money laundering and the financing of
terrorism, or entail a compliance or conduct risk. The Compliance Unit has among its tasks the fostering of knowledge and application of the Code of Conduct, helping to resolve doubts regarding interpretation of the Code through the Code of Conduct
Consultation Channel and managing the Whistleblowing Channel. With regard to possible violations of the Code of Conduct, BBVA has a disciplinary system through which appropriate measures are taken, if necessary.
|
● |
|
Whistleblowing channel that allows financial and accounting irregularities to be communicated to
the audit committee, together with potential breaches of the code of conduct and irregular activities in the organisation, reporting, where applicable, if the channel is confidential in nature and if it allows for anonymous communication that
respects the rights of the reporting party and the subject of the report. |
The Whistleblowing Channel is
an essential part of the BBVA Group compliance system and is one of the processes established to ensure that the regulations and guidelines of the Code of Conduct are effectively applied. This Channel is also a means of helping BBVA members and
third parties outside the Group to report confidentially and, if they wish, anonymously, behaviours that deviate from the Code of Conduct or violate applicable law or internal regulations, including financial or accounting irregularities.
The Compliance Unit processes complaints promptly in an objective and impartial manner and guarantees the confidentiality of the
investigatory processes.
During the 2021 financial year, the BBVA Group implemented a global Whistleblowing Channel tool provided
by an external supplier in most geographical areas where the Group has a presence. This online platform is accessible to all employees through the corporate Intranet and third parties outside BBVA can access it via a public link posted on the BBVA
Group website (www.bkms-system.com/bbva). This global tool raises the standards of security, confidentiality and anonymity and, therefore,
the level of protection afforded the whistleblower and the party being reported. BBVA employees have at their disposal guides (FAQ, and a tutorial) to facilitate use of this tool.
Whistleblowers play a key role in preventing and detecting inappropriate behaviour, so affording them protection is a priority for the
BBVA Group. Individuals who report facts or actions in good faith via the Whistleblowing Channel will not face any reprisals or other adverse consequences for what they report.
As explained in the previous section, a Corporate Integrity Management Committee, of global scope exists for the whole BBVA Group,
among whose roles and responsibilities (set out in greater detail in its regulations) are:
|
- |
Driving and monitoring global initiatives to foster and promote a culture of ethics and integrity among members of the
Group. |
|
- |
Ensuring the uniform application of the Code. |
|
- |
Promoting and monitoring the functioning and effectiveness of the Whistleblowing Channel. |
|
- |
In cases where they are not already included among the members of the Committee, informing Senior Management and/or
the person responsible for preparing the financial statements of any events and circumstances from which significant risks might arise for BBVA. |
In addition, through the Compliance function, periodic reports are submitted to the Risk and Compliance Committee which, in compliance
with its Regulations, reviews and monitors the systems under which Group professionals may confidentially report any irregularities in financial information or other matters.
57
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
● |
|
Periodic training and refresher courses for employees involved in preparing and revising financial
information and in assessing ICFR, covering at least accounting standards, auditing, internal control and risk management. |
The Finance area has a specific programme of courses and seminars, run in both its classroom and virtual campus, which
complement the general training of all employees of the BBVA Group, in line with their roles and responsibilities. Specific training and periodic refresher courses are given on accounting and tax regulations, internal control and risk management,
particularly for teams in the areas involved in preparing and reviewing the financial and tax-related information and in evaluating the internal control system, to help them perform their functions correctly.
These courses are taught by professionals from the area and renowned external providers.
Additionally, the BBVA Group has a
personal development plan for all employees, which forms the basis of a personalised training programme to deal with the areas of knowledge necessary to perform their functions.
F.2 Financial reporting risk assessment
Give information on at least:
F.2.1. The key features of the risk identification process, including error and fraud risks, with respect to:
|
● |
|
Whether the process exists and is documented. |
The ICFR was developed by the Group Management in accordance with international standards set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), which establishes five components on which the effectiveness and efficiency of internal control systems must be based:
|
- |
Establishing an adequate control environment for monitoring all these activities. |
|
- |
Assessing the risks that may be incurred by an entity in drawing up its financial information. |
|
- |
Designing the necessary controls to mitigate the most critical risks. |
|
- |
Establishing the adequate information circuits to detect and communicate the systems weaknesses or
inefficiencies. |
|
- |
Monitoring such controls to ensure that they are operational and to guarantee their effectiveness over time.
|
In order to identify the risks with a greater potential impact on the generation of financial information, the
processes through which such information is generated are analysed and documented first, and an analysis of the risks, errors or inaccuracies that may arise in each is later conducted.
Based on the corporate internal control methodology, the risks are categorised by type, including process errors and fraud, and their
probability of occurrence and possible impact are analysed.
The identification of risks in the preparation of Financial
Statements, including those of error, falsehood or omission, is performed by the first line of defence: those responsible for each of the processes that contribute to the preparation of financial information and those responsible for their control.
This risk identification is performed taking into account the theoretical risk model and the mitigation and control framework previously defined by the specialists for each type of risk (within the second line of defence) which, in the case of
Finance, is the Internal Financial Control unit (RCS Finance, specialising in tax and financial reporting risk), who, in addition, challenges the functioning and effectiveness of the controls implemented.
Whether the assessment of their controls is annual, quarterly or monthly is determined based on the significance of the risks, this
ensuring coverage of the risks considered critical for the financial statements.
58
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
The assessment of the aforementioned risks and the design and effectiveness of their
controls begins with the understanding of and insight into the analysed operating process, considering criteria of quantitative materiality, likelihood of occurrence and economic impact, in addition to qualitative criteria associated with the type,
complexity and nature of the risks or of the business or process structure itself.
The system for identifying and assessing the
risks of internal control over financial reporting is dynamic. It evolves continuously, always reflecting the reality of the Groups business, changes in operating processes, the regulations applicable at all times, the new risks affecting them
and the controls that mitigate them.
All this is documented in a corporate management tool developed and managed by the Non-Financial Risk area (MIGRO, implemented in 2021). This tool documents all the risks and controls, by process, that are managed by the different risk specialists, including the Financial Internal Control - RCS
Finance.
|
● |
|
Whether the process covers all of the objectives of financial reporting (existence and occurrence;
completeness; valuation; presentation, breakdown and comparability; and rights and obligations), whether the information is updated and how frequently. |
Each of the processes identified in the BBVA Group for drawing up financial information aim to record all financial transactions, value
the assets and liabilities in accordance with applicable accounting regulations and provide a breakdown of the information in accordance with regulatory requirements and market needs.
The financial reporting control model analyses each of the phases of the processes mentioned above (from procedural governance,
documentation, criteria setting, decision making, information provision, application operation, monitoring generated information, and reporting), in order to ensure that the risks identified in each of the phases of the processes are adequately
covered by controls that operate efficiently. The control model is updated when changes arise in the relevant processes or support tools for producing financial information.
|
● |
|
The existence of a process for identifying the consolidation perimeter, taking into account
aspects including the possible existence of complex corporate structures, instrumental entities or special purpose vehicles. |
The Finance area includes a department responsible for the Groups financial consolidation, which carries out a monthly process of
identification, analysis and updating of the perimeter of the Groups consolidated companies.
In addition, the information
from the consolidation department on new companies set up by the Groups different units and the changes made to existing companies is compared with the data analysed by a specific committee at corporate level, whose objective is to analyse and
document the changes in the composition of the corporate group and optimise its corporate structure (Corporate Structure Committee CSC).
In addition, the Finance area of the Bank, in controlling special purpose entities, makes a periodic report to the Audit Committee on
the structure of the Group of companies.
|
● |
|
Whether the process takes into account the effects of other types of risks (operational,
technological, financial, legal, tax-related, reputational, environmental etc.) insofar as they impact the financial statements. |
The model of internal control over financial reporting applies to processes for directly drawing up such financial information and to
all operational or technical processes that could have a relevant impact on the financial, accounting, tax-related or management information.
As mentioned above, the Group has an internal control model coordinated by the Regulation & Internal Control area, which uses
a single methodology to assess all the Groups non-financial risks (mainly: operational, technological, financial, legal, tax, reputational, compliance and third party risks). All the specialist risk
areas and heads of control use a common tool (MIGRO) to document the identification of the risks, the controls that mitigate those risks and the assessment of their effectiveness.
59
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
There are control assurers in all the operational or support areas, and therefore any
type of risk that may affect the Groups operations is analysed under that methodology and is included in the ICFR insofar as it may have an impact on the financial information.
|
● |
|
Which of the entitys governing bodies supervises the process. |
The process for identifying risks and assessing the design, effectiveness and suitability of the controls for generating financial
information is documented at least once a year, and is overseen by the Internal Audit area.
Moreover, the Groups head of
Internal Financial Control - RCS Finance reports annually to the Audit Committee on analysis work that has been carried out, on the conclusions of the assessment of the control model relating to the generation of financial information, and on the
process for downstream certification of the effectiveness of the control model. This process is undertaken by the financial officers of the main entities and Holding control specialists. This work follows a standard methodology in compliance with
SOX legal requirements, on systems of internal control over financial information, and is included in Form 20-F, submitted annually to the SEC, as indicated in Section F.1.1 above.
F.3 Control activities
Give information on the main features thereof, if at least the following exist:
F.3.1. |
Procedures for the review and authorisation of financial information and the description of the
ICFR to be published in the stock markets, indicating the persons responsible therefor and the documentation describing the activity flows and controls (including those concerning risk of fraud) for the different types of transactions that may
materially impact the financial statements, including the procedure for closing the accounts and the specific review of the relevant judgements, estimates, valuations and projections. |
All processes related to the preparation of financial information are documented, as well as their control model: potential risks linked
to each process and controls established for their mitigation. As explained in Section F.2.1, the aforementioned risks and controls are recorded in the corporate tool MIGRO, which also includes the result of the assessment of the effectiveness
of the controls and the degree of risk mitigation.
Specifically, the key processes related to the generation of financial
information are found in the Finance area and are as follows: accounting, consolidation, financial reporting, financial planning and monitoring, financial and tax management. The analysis of these processes, their risks and their controls are also
supplemented by that of all other critical risks, in the processes of the various business areas or other support areas, that may have a financial impact on the financial statements.
In the review procedures for functioning of the control model, special attention is paid to the financial and tax-related information disseminated to the securities markets, including a specific review of controls on relevant judgements, estimates and projections used in the preparation of the above-mentioned information.
As mentioned in section 1.5 of the consolidated financial statements and in section 1.5 of the financial statements of BBVA, S.A.,
estimates are sometimes necessary to determine the amount at which certain assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and commitments should be recorded.
These estimates are made based on the best information available on the financial statement closing date and, together with the other
relevant issues for the closing of the annual and six-monthly financial statements, are revised and authorised by a Committee made up of the principal experts in these matters.
F.3.2. |
Internal control policies and procedures for information systems (among others, access security,
change control, the operation thereof, operational continuity and segregation of functions) that support the relevant processes of the entity in relation to the preparation and publication of financial information. |
60
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
The Groups current internal control model has expanded the catalogue of
technological risks managed as non-financial risks to three distinct categories, under the responsibility of the Engineering Risk Control Specialist (RCS):
|
✓ |
Physical security: Covers risks from inadequate management of the physical security of assets (including technology)
and individuals due to the damage and deterioration of such assets. |
|
✓ |
Technological security: Covers risks from inadequate management of technology changes, IT system failures, risk from
low IT availability and performance, IT system integrity risk, application tampering fraud, and logical impersonation. |
|
✓ |
Information and Data Security: Covers risks from unauthorised access, modification or destruction of data
infrastructure, loss, theft or misuse of information and cyber-attacks that affect the privacy, confidentiality, availability and integrity of information. |
The internal control models include procedures and controls regarding the operation of information and access security systems, the
segregation of functions, and the development and modification of computer applications used to generate financial information.
Both types of control are identified in the model of internal control over financial reporting and are analysed and assessed
periodically, in order to guarantee the integrity and reliability of the information drawn up.
Consequently, the control model of
the BBVA Group covers the adequate management of access control, establishes the correct and necessary steps taken to put applications into production as well as ensuring their subsequent support, the creation of backup copies, and assurance of
continuity in the processing and recording of operations.
In summary, the entire process of preparing and publishing financial
information has established and documented the procedures and control models for technology and IT systems necessary to provide reasonable assurance of the correctness of the BBVA Groups public financial information.
F.3.3. |
Internal control policies and procedures designed to supervise the management of activities
subcontracted to third parties and those aspects of evaluation, calculation or assessment outsourced to independent experts which may materially impact the financial statements. |
The internal control model sets out specific controls and procedures for the management of subcontracted activities or those aspects of
evaluation, calculation and assessment of assets or liabilities outsourced to independent experts.
There is a specialist area for
risk (RCS) arising from third party operations, a regulation and a non-financial risk admission committee that analyses outsourcing operations, the risks they can incorporate into the Group and the controls
necessary for their mitigation. Additionally, the requirements to be met at the Group level for the activities to be subcontracted are established and monitored.
There are procedural manuals for the outsourced financial processes that identify the procedures to be followed and the controls to be
applied by the service provider units and outsourcing units. The controls established in the outsourced processes concerning the generation of financial information are also tested by the Internal Financial Control area of the entity that carried
out the outsourcing.
The valuations from independent experts used for matters relevant for generating financial information are
included within the standard circuit of review procedures executed by internal control, internal auditing and external auditing.
F.4
Information and communication
Give information on the main features thereof, if at least the following exist:
F.4.1. |
A specific function charged with defining accounting policies (accounting policy department or
area), keeping them current and resolving queries or conflicts stemming from their interpretation, ensuring fluid communication with those in charge of operations in the organisation and maintaining an up-to-date manual of accounting policies that is communicated to the units through which the entity operates. |
61
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
The Finance area and, in particular, Accounting &
Regulatory Reporting, has a solid governance system, which includes two Technical Working Groups: one for Accounting and one for Capital. The purpose of these committees is to analyse, study and issue standards that may affect the compilation of
the Groups financial and regulatory information, to determine the accounting and solvency criteria required to ensure that transactions are booked correctly, and to calculate capital requirements within the framework of the applicable
standards.
The Group also has an Accounting Policies Manual, which is updated and made available to all Group units by means of the
Intranet. This Manual is the tool that guarantees that all the decisions related to accounting policies or specific accounting criteria to be applied in the Group are supported and are standardised. This Manual is approved by the Technical
Accounting Working Group and is continuously documented and updated for use and analysis by all the Groups entities.
F.4.2. |
Mechanisms to capture and prepare financial reporting in standardised formats for application
and use by all units comprising the entity or group that support the main financial statements and the notes thereto, in addition to detailed information on ICFR. |
The BBVA Groups Finance area and the countries financial management units are responsible for the processes for
preparing financial statements in accordance with the current accounting and consolidation manuals. There is also a consolidation computer application that collects the accounting information of the various companies within the Group and performs
the consolidation processes, including the standardisation of accounting criteria, aggregation of balances and consolidation adjustments.
Control measures have also been implemented in each of the aforementioned processes, both locally and at consolidated level, to ensure
that all the data supplying the financial information is collected in a comprehensive, exact and timely manner. There is also a single and standardised financial reporting system that is applicable to and used by all the Group units and supports the
main financial statements and the explanatory notes. There are also control measures and procedures to ensure that the information disclosed to the markets contains a breakdown that is tailored to regulatory requirements and sufficient so as to
enable investors and other users of the financial information to understand and interpret it.
F.5 Supervision of the systems
operation
Give information on the main features of at least:
F.5.1. |
The ICFR supervision activities carried out by the audit committee and whether the entity has an
internal audit function with powers that include providing support to the audit committee in its task of supervising the internal control system, including the ICFR. Likewise, information will be given on the scope of the ICFR assessment carried out
during the financial year and of the procedure by which the person in charge of performing the assessment communicates its results, whether the entity has an action plan listing the possible corrective measures, and whether its impact on financial
reporting has been considered. |
The internal control units of the business areas and of the support areas
conduct a preliminary review of the internal control model, assess the risks identified in the processes, the effectiveness of controls, and the degree of mitigation of the risks, as well as identifying possible control weaknesses and designing,
implementing and monitoring the mitigation measures and action plans.
The first assessment of the effectiveness of the risk
controls for the financial information preparation process is carried out by the RCA (Risk Control Assurer), who is responsible for control in the first line of defence, and layer by the RCS (Risk Control Specialist second line of defence)
who must challenge the design and operation of the controls in order to issue a conclusion on the operation of the control model established for the risks covered by his field of expertise.
BBVA also has an Internal Audit unit that supports the Audit Committee with regard to the independent supervision of the internal
financial information control system. The Internal Audit function is entirely independent of the units that draw up the financial information.
All the weaknesses in controls, mitigation measures and specific action plans are documented in the corporate tool MIGRO and submitted
to the internal control and operational risk committees of the areas, as well as to the local or global Corporate Assurance Committees, based on the significance of the detected issues.
62
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
Both the weaknesses identified by the internal control units and those detected by the
internal or external auditor have an action plan in place to correct or mitigate risk.
During the 2022 financial year, the areas
responsible for Group Internal Control conducted a full assessment of the system for internal control over financial reporting, and, to date, no material or significant weakness having any impact on the preparation of financial information have been
revealed therein.
Additionally, in compliance with the SOX, the Groups Internal Control and Internal Auditing areas annually
assesses the effectiveness of the model of internal control over financial reporting on a group of risks (within the perimeter of SOX companies) that could affect the drawing up of financial statements at local and consolidated levels. This
perimeter incorporates risks and controls in Finance and other specialisms that are not directly financial (technology, risks, operational processes, human resources, procurement, legal etc.). The results of this assessment are reported annually to
the Audit Committee.
F.5.2. |
Whether there is a discussion procedure pursuant to which the auditor (in line with the
technical auditing standards), the internal audit function and other experts can inform senior management and the audit committee or the entitys directors of significant internal control weaknesses identified during the review processes for
the annual financial statements or any others within their remit. Also provide information on whether there is an action plan that endeavours to correct or mitigate the weaknesses observed. |
As described in Section (F.5.1) above, the Group has a procedure in place whereby the internal auditor and the heads of Internal
Financial Control report to the Audit Committee any significant internal control weaknesses detected in the course of their work. Any significant or material weaknesses, if present, will likewise be reported. Similarly, there is a procedure whereby
the external auditor reports to the Audit Committee the result of their work assessing the system for internal control over financial information.
Since BBVA is a listed company supervised by the SEC, the Groups external auditor issues an annual opinion on the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting contained in the Groups consolidated financial statements as of 31 December of each year under PCAOB (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) standards, in order to file a Form 20-F financial report with the SEC. The latest report issued on the financial information for 2021 is available at www.sec.gov and at https://www.bbva.com/en/.
All control weaknesses detected by the Internal Control, Internal Audit and External Audit areas have an action plan for resolution and
are reported to the Internal Control Committees of each area, to the Corporate Assurance Committees (local or global, depending on the severity of the weaknesses) and also to the Audit Committee.
The internal control oversight carried out by the Audit Committee, described in the Regulations of the Audit Committee published on the
Group website, https://www.bbva.com/en/, includes the following activities:
|
● |
|
Analyse, prior to their presentation to the Board of Directors and in enough detail to guarantee their accuracy,
reliability, sufficiency and clarity, the financial statements of the Bank and of its consolidated Group contained in the annual, six-monthly and quarterly reports, as well as in all other required financial
information and related non-financial information. For this purpose, the Committee will have the support it needs from the Groups Senior Management, especially that of the area responsible for accounting
functions, and from the Company and Group auditor, as well as all the necessary information made available to it with the level of aggregation deemed appropriate. |
|
● |
|
Review the necessary consolidation perimeter, the correct application of accounting criteria, and all the relevant
changes relating to the accounting principles used and the presentation of the financial statements. |
63
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
|
● |
|
Monitor the effectiveness of the Companys internal control as well as its risk management systems, in terms of the
process of preparing and reporting financial information, including tax-related risks, and discuss with the auditor any significant weaknesses detected in the internal control system during the audit, without undermining its independence. For such
purposes, and where appropriate, the Committee may submit recommendations or proposals to the Board of Directors, along with the deadline for their follow-up. |
|
● |
|
Analyse and, where appropriate, approve the annual work plan for the Internal Audit area, as well as any other
occasional or specific plans to be implemented as a result of regulatory changes or as required for organisation of the Groups business. |
|
● |
|
To be aware of the audited units degree of compliance with corrective measures previously recommended by the
Internal Audit area and inform the Board of those cases that may involve a significant risk for the Group. |
The
external auditor and the head of Internal Audit attend all regular meetings of the Audit Committee to report on the matters dealt with within their respective remits.
F.6 Other relevant information
F.7 |
External auditor report |
Report on:
F.7.1. |
Whether the ICFR information disclosed to the markets has been subject to review by the external
auditor, in which case the entity must attach the corresponding report as an annex. If not, explain the reasons therefor. |
The information related to the BBVA Groups internal control over financial reporting described in this report is reviewed by the
external auditor, which issues its opinion on the control system and on its effectiveness in relation to the accounts published at the close of each financial year.
On 4 March 2022, the BBVA Group, as a private foreign issuer in the United States, filed the Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the financial year ending on 31 December 2021, which was published on the SEC website on that same date.
In accordance with the requirements set out in Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC), the aforementioned Annual Report (Form 20-F) included certification of the Groups executive principles with regard to the establishment, maintenance and assessment of the Groups
system of internal control over financial reporting.
The Form 20-F report also included the
opinion of the external auditor regarding the effectiveness of the Companys system of internal control over financial reporting at the close of the 2021 financial year in Item 15 (controls and procedures).
The Form 20-F Annual Report is available on the corporate website of Banco Bilbao Vizcaya
Argentaria, S.A., https://www.bbva.com/en/, in the Shareholders and Investors section, Financial Reports
subsection, financial year 2021 within the Financial Information section (https:
(https://shareholdersandinvestors.bbva.com/financials/financial-reports/#2021).
G EXTENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH CORPORATE GOVERNANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
Indicate the extent of the companys compliance with the recommendations of the Good Governance Code of Listed Companies.
If any recommendations are not being followed or are only being followed in part, a detailed explanation of the reasons for this must be provided so
that shareholders, investors and the market in general have sufficient information to assess the actions of the company. General explanations will not be acceptable.
1. |
The bylaws of listed companies should not place an upper limit on the votes that can be cast
by a single shareholder, or impose other obstacles to the takeover of the company by means of share purchases on the market. |
64
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
✓
COMPLIANT
2. |
Where the listed company is controlled by another entity within the meaning of Article 42 of
the Spanish Commercial Code, whether listed or not, and has, directly or through its subsidiaries, business relations with said entity or one of its subsidiaries (other than those of the listed company) or engages in activities related to those of
any one of them, it should publicly report accurately on: |
|
a) |
The respective areas of activity and potential business relations between the listed company
or its subsidiaries and the parent company or its subsidiaries. |
|
b) |
The mechanisms in place to resolve possible conflicts of interest.
|
NOT APPLICABLE
3. |
During the annual general meeting, as a supplement to the information circulated in the annual
corporate governance report, the chairman of the board of directors should verbally inform shareholders in sufficient detail of the most relevant aspects of the companys corporate governance, particularly: |
|
a) |
Changes that have occurred since the previous annual general meeting.
|
|
b) |
The specific reasons for the company not following a given Corporate Governance Code
recommendation, and any alternative rules applied in this regard. |
✓ COMPLIANT
4. |
The company should establish and implement a policy of communication and contacts with
shareholders and institutional investors within the framework of their involvement in the company, as well as with proxy advisers, that complies in full with market abuse regulations and accords equitable treatment to similarly situated
shareholders. This policy should be disclosed on the companys website, including information relating to how it has been put into practice and identifying the relevant actors or individuals responsible for the implementation thereof.
|
And, without prejudice to the legal obligations regarding the disclosure of privileged information and
other regulated information, the company also has a general policy regarding the communication of economic-financial, non-financial and corporate information through the channels it deems appropriate (media,
social media, or other channels) to help maximise dissemination and the quality of information available to the market, investors and other stakeholders.
✓ COMPLIANT
5. |
The board of directors should not make a proposal to the general meeting for the delegation of
powers to issue shares or convertible securities without pre-emptive subscription rights in an amount exceeding 20% of capital at the time of such delegation. |
When a board of directors approves the issuance of shares or convertible securities that exclude
pre-emptive subscription rights, the company should immediately post the reports contemplated by commercial laws on its website regarding such exclusion.
PARTIALLY COMPLIANT
The General
Meeting held on 18 March 2022, under items four and five of the Agenda, delegated to the Board of Directors the power to increase share capital and to issue convertible debentures, respectively, with a discretion to exclude, in whole or in
part, the pre-emptive subscription rights of the shareholders in connection with any specific issuance using such authorities. This power to exclude pre-emptive
subscription rights is limited in the aggregate of both authorities to 10% of BBVAs share capital as at the time the resolutions were adopted. Also, at its meeting on 20 April, 2021, the BBVA General Shareholders Meeting delegated
to the Board of Directors the power to issue securities that are convertible into newly issued BBVA shares, the conversion of which is possible and is foreseen to meet regulatory requirements concerning their eligibility as capital instruments and
it also delegated the power to exclude, in whole or in part, the pre-emptive subscription right of shareholders within the context of a specific issuance, when required in the corporate interest and in
compliance with the legal requirements and limitations applicable on each occasion, in which case limitation to 20% of the share capital shall not apply as the holdings of the shareholders would not be diluted. This is in accordance with the wording
of the additional fifteenth provision of the Corporate Enterprises Act, which states that the 20% limit provided for in Article 511 shall not apply to this type of issuance.
6. |
Listed companies that prepare the reports listed below, whether on a mandatory or voluntary
basis, should publish them on their website with sufficient time prior to the annual general meeting, even when such publication is not required: |
|
a) |
Report on auditor independence. |
|
b) |
Reports on the functioning of the audit committee and the appointments and remuneration
committee. |
|
c) |
Audit committee report on related-party transactions. |
65
This English version is a translation of the original in Spanish for information purposes only. In case of a discrepancy, the Spanish original will
prevail.
✓
COMPLIANT
7. |
The company should broadcast its general shareholders meetings live on its
website. |
And the company should have mechanisms that enable proxy voting, remote voting and,
in the case of large cap companies and to the extent the same are proportional, attendance and active participation in the General Meeting.
✓ COMPLIANT
8. |
The audit committee should ensure that the annual financial statements presented by the board
of directors to the general shareholders meeting are prepared in accordance with the accounting regulations. And in cases where the auditor has included any qualifications in its audit report, the chair of the audit committee should clearly
explain to the general meeting the opinion of the audit committee on the content and scope thereof, making a summary of this opinion available to shareholders at the time of publication of the calling of the meeting, together with the other
proposals and reports of the board. |
✓ COMPLIANT
9. |
The company should disclose its requirements and procedures for demonstrating share ownership,
the right to attend the general shareholders meeting and the exercise or delegation of voting rights, and display them permanently on its website. |