UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2011
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File Number 0-07491
MOLEX INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
36-2369491
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
2222 Wellington Court, Lisle, Illinois 60532
(Address of principal executive
offices)
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(630) 969-4550
SECURITIES
REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.05
Class A Common Stock, par value $0.05
|
|
The Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC
The Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC
|
SECURITIES
REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes
o
No
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15
(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
(Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrants
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K.
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2
of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer
þ
|
|
Accelerated
filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer
o
|
|
Smaller reporting
company
o
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes
o
No
þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting shares
held by non-affiliates as of the last business day of the
registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter
was approximately $2.4 billion (based on the closing price
of these shares on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on
December 31, 2010).
On July 27, 2011, the following numbers of shares of the
Companys common stock were outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
95,560,076
|
|
Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
79,714,591
|
|
Class B Common Stock
|
|
|
94,255
|
|
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, to be held on October 28, 2011, are
incorporated by reference into Part III of this annual
report on
Form 10-K.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
Molex Web
Site
We make available through our web site at www.molex.com our
annual report on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K
and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably
practicable after such material is electronically filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Information relating to corporate governance at Molex, including
our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, information concerning
executive officers, directors and Board committees (including
committee charters), and transactions in Molex securities by
directors and officers, is available on or through our web site
at www.molex.com under the Investors caption.
We are not including the information on our web site as a part
of, or incorporating it by reference into, this annual report on
Form 10-K.
2
PART I
Molex Incorporated (together with its subsidiaries, except where
the context otherwise requires, we, us
and our) was incorporated in the state of Delaware
in 1972 and originated from an enterprise established in 1938.
We are one of the worlds largest manufacturers of
electronic connectors in terms of net revenue. Our net revenue
was $3.6 billion for fiscal 2011. We operated 39
manufacturing locations in 16 countries, and employed
33,613 people worldwide as of June 30, 2011.
Our core business is the manufacture and sale of electronic
components. Our products are used by a large number of leading
original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) throughout the world. We
design, manufacture and sell more than 100,000 products,
including terminals, connectors, planar cables, cable
assemblies, interconnection systems, backplanes, integrated
products and mechanical and electronic switches.
The Connector
Industry
The global connector industry is estimated to represent
approximately $45 billion in net revenue for calendar year
2010 and is a highly competitive industry. The industry has
grown at a compounded annual rate of 5.2% over the past
20 years.
The connector industry is characterized by rapid advances in
technology and new product development. These advances have been
substantially driven by the increased functionality of
applications in which our products are used. There is a constant
demand for new product solutions and innovations in the
technology industry. Our product life cycles tend to mirror the
life span of our customers products although many of our
products are designed into subsequent applications. Consumer and
mobile products have relatively short product life cycles while
automotive and industrial products are typically longer.
Industry trends that we deem particularly relevant include:
|
|
|
|
|
Globalization.
Synergistic opportunities exist
for the industry to design, manufacture and sell electronic
products in different countries around the world in an efficient
and seamless process. For example, our customers products
may be designed in Japan, manufactured in China and sold in
multiple geographies.
|
|
|
|
Convergence of products.
Traditionally
separate products developed for consumer electronics, infotech
and telecommunications markets are converging, resulting in
electronic devices offering broad-based functionality.
|
|
|
|
Increasing electronics content.
Consumer
demand for advanced product features, convenience and
connectivity is increasing electronic content in end devices.
For example, electronic content in automobiles is increasing due
to advances in infotainment, telematics and safety systems.
|
|
|
|
Increasing storage and bandwidth
requirements.
The global demand and use of
streaming information such as audio and video require electronic
components to have increased storage capacity and high-speed
retrieval capabilities. Increasing internet traffic is taxing
existing network infrastructure, resulting in equipment upgrades
and capacity additions.
|
|
|
|
Product size reduction.
High-density,
micro-miniature technologies originally developed for consumer
product applications are expanding to markets such as infotech
and telecommunications, leading to smaller devices and greater
mobility.
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidating supply base.
Generally, global
OEMs are consolidating their supply chain by selecting global
companies possessing broad product lines and a strong financial
position for the majority of their connector requirements.
|
|
|
|
Price erosion.
Due to rapidly evolving
innovation in the technology industry, our customers
experience pressure to reduce their prices to meet consumer
expectations. As a result, component suppliers are generally
expected to lower prices.
|
|
|
|
Competitive market.
There are a large number
of competitors in the connector industry increasing the level of
competition worldwide. We believe that the 10 largest connector
suppliers, as measured by net revenue, represent approximately
54% of the worldwide market and exhibit a faster growth rate
than their smaller competitors.
|
|
|
|
Rising commodity prices.
Commodity prices
continue to increase and affect gross margin.
|
Markets and
Products
The approximate percentage of our net revenue by market for
fiscal 2011 is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Fiscal 2011
|
|
|
|
Primary End Use Products
|
Markets
|
|
|
Net Revenue
|
|
|
|
Supported by Molex
|
Telecommunications
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
|
Mobile phones and devices, networking equipment, switches and
transmission equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infotech
|
|
|
|
23%
|
|
|
|
Desktop, tablet and notebook computers, peripheral equipment,
servers and storage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
19%
|
|
|
|
Digital electronics, cameras, flat panel display, plasma and LCD
televisions, electronic games and major appliances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial
|
|
|
|
15%
|
|
|
|
Factory automation, robotics, machine tool, complex machine
builder, device manufacturers (sensors & valves) and
electrical lighting and cables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive
|
|
|
|
15%
|
|
|
|
Powertrain, body electronics, safety electronics, sensors,
infotainment, telematics and other automotive electronics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (includes Medical, Military and Aerospace)
|
|
|
|
3%
|
|
|
|
Electronic and electrical devices for a variety of products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecommunications.
In the telecommunications
market, we believe our key strengths include high-speed optical
signal product lines, backplane connector systems and power
distribution products. For mobile phones, we provide
micro-miniature connectors, SIM and SD card sockets, keypads,
electromechanical subassemblies and internal antennas and
subsystems.
We released several new products for the telecommunications
market in fiscal 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
SlimStack
tm
0.40mm
B-to-B
connectors, 0.70mm height, high retention are ideal for tight
packaging applications such as mobile phones;
|
|
|
|
SlimStack
tm
0.40mm (.016) connectors offer the industrys widest
selection of low profile, ultra-narrow-width connectors in
various stack heights for space savings and design flexibility;
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
On-ground antennas, 2.4 GHz, SMD, are the smallest
on-ground antenna of its kind, require no ground clearance and
save space on printed circuit boards(PCB);
|
|
|
|
Magnetic Jacks:
Gigabit and Gigabit
PoE+-Enabled are modular jacks, available in single-port and
multi-port versions, to simplify customer board layouts by
reducing the components required and support a wide variety of
applications; and
|
|
|
|
Standalone antennas, 2.4/5 GHz, combine
ground-plane-independent design with high-radiation efficiency
to provide better connectivity and reduced development time for
wireless devices.
|
Infotech.
In the infotech market, our key
strengths include our high-speed signal product line, storage
input/output (I/O) products, standards committee
leadership, global coordination and strong relationships with
OEMs, contract manufacturers and original design manufacturers.
We manufacture power, optical and signal connectors and cables
for fast
end-to-end
data transfer, linking disk drives, controllers, servers,
switches and storage enclosures. For example, our family of
small form-factor pluggable products offer end-users both fiber
optic and copper connectivity and more efficient storage area
network management. Our ongoing involvement in industry
committees contributes to the development of new standards for
the connectors and cables that transport data.
We hold a strong position with the connectors used in servers,
the segment of this market that accounts for the largest volume
of connector purchases. We offer a large variety of products for
power distribution, signal integrity, processor and memory
applications. We are also a leading designer in the industry for
storage devices.
We participate in the tablet market with a wide range of
customers, largely using products developed for mobile phones
and smartphones.
We released several new products for the infotech market in
fiscal 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
QSFP+ Interconnect System and Active Optical Cable Assemblies
are part of a highly-integrated system that combines optimal
real estate, power and port density and achieve 40 Gbps
data rates over long reaches up to 4km;
|
|
|
|
iPass+
tm
High-Speed Channel (HSC) CXP Copper and Optical Systems achieve
rates up to 120 Gbps of pluggable data over 12 lanes in one
assembly, meeting the new industry-leading 100 Gigabit Ethernet
specification and providing a path to future terabit networks;
|
|
|
|
EXTreme
Ten60Power
tm
Hybrid Power and Signal Connectors are a new generation,
high-current power and signal connectors providing up to 260.0A
per inch of current in a low-profile housing; and
|
|
|
|
PCI Express Mini-Card Connectors are ultra-low-profile with an
extensive range of top-mount, right-angle variants to target
very-low to high-profile height applications in next-generation
communication devices.
|
Consumer.
In the consumer market, we believe
our key strengths include micro-miniature connector engineering
and manufacturing capabilities, breadth of our high wattage
product line and cable and wire application equipment.
We design and manufacture many of the worlds smallest
connectors for home and portable audio, digital still and video
cameras, DVD players and recorders, as well as devices that
combine multiple functions. Our micro-miniature products support
customer needs for increased power, speed and functionality, but
with decreased weight and space requirements. We provide
industry leadership with advanced interconnection products that
help enhance the performance of video and still cameras, DVD
players, portable music players, PDAs and hybrid devices that
combine multiple capabilities into a single unit.
We are a leading connector source and preferred supplier to some
of the worlds largest computer game makers. In addition,
we provide components for gaming machines.
5
We released several new products for the consumer market in
fiscal 2011 including:
|
|
|
|
|
Flexi-Mate
tm
3.70mm
B-to-B
and
W-to-B
Connector Systems provide a full range of both
board-to-board
and
wire-to-board
solutions designed to meet the backlighting needs of LED TVs and
room lighting applications;
|
|
|
|
Evaldi
tm
Earphones combine leading-edge acoustic concepts with precision
manufacturing techniques to provide a comfortable high-fidelity
sound experience;
|
|
|
|
FPC 0.30mm Connectors, Dual Contact, 1.15mm height, are
microminiature SMT FFC/FPC connectors with features to meet a
wide variety of space and application-specific needs; and
|
|
|
|
Premo-Flex
tm
FFC Jumpers for High-Temp Applications have high-temperature
ratings up to +105°C and are available in a variety of
pitches to deliver flexible solutions between PCBs for virtually
any industry.
|
Industrial.
In the industrial market, we
believe our key strengths include our circular ruggedized
connector expertise, industrial communications and networking
technology, breadth of our power and signal product lines,
distribution partnerships and global presence.
Our extensive industrial product line includes network interface
cards, software for industrial networks and custom or industry
standard cord sets. We offer a complete line of
Woodhead
®
electrical solutions designed to support optimal worker safety
and performance for todays harsh duty environments. Our
industry-leading solutions range from portable lighting to power
distribution supporting the needs of industries such as
commercial construction, utility, petrochemical and food and
beverage. In addition, we offer I/O connectors deployed in a
variety of industrial production equipment on the factory floor,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
Automated assembly equipment;
|
|
|
|
Conveyors and material handling equipment;
|
|
|
|
Packaging equipment; and
|
|
|
|
Pick-and-place
robots.
|
We released several new products for the industrial market in
fiscal 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
Brad
®
Micro-Change
®
Circular Hybrid Technology (CHT) connectors are IP67-sealed M12
connectors with innovative wrap-around shielding that combines
Cat5e data speed with power lines for excellent signal integrity
and optimal performance while reducing cabling requirements and
installation costs in harsh industrial applications;
|
|
|
|
SolarSpec
tm
DC Connectors and Cable are rugged and durable, IP67-sealed,
with simple snap-lock mating and an internal locking mechanism
for superior safety, designed for direct connection to solar
junction boxes, field installations and photovoltaic grid wiring
and deliver quality and value to module manufacturers,
installers and distributors;
|
|
|
|
Multi-Drop Sealed Connector and Cable Systems feature rugged
IP66 and IP67 interface seals using field-termination
cable-pierce technology to offer a simple, free-form, pluggable
connector string for internal and external data/signal and power
applications; and
|
|
|
|
DeviceNet Passive Multi-Port Distribution Block is designed to
be a low-cost, real time, device level bus architecture that
connects sensors and actuators to simplify the wiring and
installation of automation devices while enhancing the
diagnostic information about the various I/O of the system.
|
Automotive.
In the automotive market, we
believe our strengths include our wide range of products and
extensive research and development capabilities that include
rapid prototyping and high volume production support. Our
automotive products are designed for every system in
todays connected vehicle: infotainment and navigation,
powertrain, safety and chassis and body electronics.
6
In addition to advanced electronics, we provide standard product
offerings such as
HSAutoLink
tm
,
MX150
tm
,
STAC64
tm
,
CMC,
MX123
tm
and Squib.
We released several new products for the automotive market in
fiscal 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
HSAutoLink
tm
Cable Assemblies leverage high-speed cable technology and adapt
to needs of the emerging segment of the Connected
Vehicle (Vehicle to Vehicle communications, Infotainment
and Telematics);
|
|
|
|
CMX Sealed Connectors are designed to perform in extreme
transportation applications and feature sophisticated,
interfacial-seal protection to ensure ultimate sealing
performance before, during and after the harness assembly
process; and
|
|
|
|
MX150
tm
Sealed Panel-Mount Connectors feature a gasket seal to meet
IP6K7 and IP6K9K sealing requirements and are mounted from the
inside-out of the module to allow for quicker installation into
the vehicle.
|
Other.
Medical electronics is a growing market
for our connectors, switch and assembly products. We provide
both connectors and custom integrated systems for diagnostic and
therapeutic equipment used in hospitals, including x-ray,
magnetic resonance imaging and dialysis machines. Military
electronics is also one of our focus markets. There is a range
of electronic applications for our products in the
commercial-off-the-shelf segment of this market. Products
originally developed for the infotech, telecommunications and
automotive markets are used in an increasing number of military
applications. We are also expanding into non-connector markets,
such as Solid State Lighting. Our Solid State Lighting business
focuses on producing the first
plug-and-play
sustainable solid state lighting module to integrate
high-efficiency precision lighting with an easy-to-use socketed
solution.
We released several new products for these other markets in
fiscal 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
MediSpec
tm
MID/LDS Capabilities combine advanced MID technology with LDS
antenna expertise to deliver integrated fine-pitch 3D circuitry
with shielding in a single molded device for high-density
medical devices and other applications.
|
|
|
|
Expanded Beam MT Interconnects increase optical transmission
reliability in high-performance applications such as medical and
data communication equipment; and LED Array Holders simplify the
LED installation process and are ideal for OEM light-fixture
manufacturers.
|
Business
Objectives and Strategies
One of our primary business objectives is to develop or improve
our leadership position in each of our core interconnect
solution markets by increasing our overall position as a
preferred supplier and improving our competitiveness on a global
scale.
We believe that our success in achieving industry-leading net
revenue growth throughout our history is the result of the
following key strengths:
|
|
|
|
|
Broad and deep technological knowledge of microelectronic
devices and techniques, power sources, coatings and materials;
|
|
|
|
Strong intellectual property portfolio that underlies many key
products;
|
|
|
|
High product quality standards, backed with stringent systems
designed to ensure consistent performance, that meet or surpass
customers expectations;
|
|
|
|
Strong technical collaboration with customers;
|
|
|
|
Extensive experience with advanced development, engineering, and
new product development processes;
|
|
|
|
Broad geographical presence in developed and developing markets;
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
Continuous effort to develop an efficient, low-cost
manufacturing footprint; and
|
|
|
|
A broad range of products both for specific applications and for
general consumption.
|
We intend to serve our customers and achieve our objectives by
continuing to focus on the following strategies:
|
|
|
|
|
Concentrate on core markets.
We focus on
markets where we have the expertise, qualifications and
leadership position to sustain a competitive advantage. We have
been an established supplier of interconnect solutions for
72 years. We are a principal supplier of connector
components to the telecommunications, infotech, consumer,
industrial and automotive electronics markets.
|
|
|
|
Grow through the development and release of new
products.
We invest strategically in the tools
and resources to develop and market new products and to expand
existing product lines through innovation. New products are
essential to enable our customers to advance their solutions and
their market leadership positions.
|
|
|
|
Strategic investments in selected
adjacencies.
We continuously review and
prioritize opportunities for adjacent markets for our
technologies. A subset of these are becoming priorities for us
and are pursued to expand our available market.
|
|
|
|
Optimize manufacturing and supply chain.
We
analyze the design and manufacturing patterns of our customers
along with our own supply chain economics to help ensure that
our manufacturing operations are of sufficient scale and are
located strategically to minimize production costs and maximize
customer service.
|
|
|
|
Leverage financial strength.
We use our
expected cash flow from operations and strong balance sheet to
invest aggressively in new product development, to pursue
synergistic acquisitions, to align manufacturing capacity with
customer requirements and to pursue productivity improvements.
We invested approximately 7% and 5% of fiscal 2011 net
revenue in capital expenditures and research and development
activities, respectively.
|
Our global organizational structure consists of three
product-focused divisions and one worldwide sales and marketing
organization. The structure enables us to work effectively as a
global team to meet customer needs as well as leverage our
design expertise and our low-cost production centers around the
world. The worldwide sales and marketing organization structure
enhances our ability to sell any product, to any customer,
anywhere in the world.
Competition
We compete with many companies in each of our product categories
and global industries. These competitors include Amphenol
Corporation, Framatome Connectors International, Hirose
Electronic Co., Ltd, Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd., Japan
Aviation Electronics Industry, Ltd., Japan Solderless Terminal
Ltd. and TE Connectivity Ltd. We also compete with a significant
number of smaller competitors who compete in specific
geographies and industries. The identity and significance of
competitors may change over time. We believe that the 10 largest
connector suppliers, as measured by net revenue, represent
approximately 54% of the worldwide market in terms of net
revenue. Many of these companies offer products in some, but not
all, of the markets and regions we serve.
Our products compete to varying degrees on the basis of quality,
price, availability, performance and brand recognition. We also
compete on the basis of customer service. Our ability to compete
also depends on continually providing innovative new product
solutions and worldwide support for our customers.
8
Customers and
Sales Channels
We sell products directly to OEMs, contract manufacturers and
distributors. Our customer base includes global companies and no
single customer accounted for more than 10% of our net revenue
in fiscal 2011, 2010 or 2009.
Many of our customers operate in more than one geographic region
of the world and we have developed a global footprint to service
these customers. We are engaged in significant operations in
foreign countries. Our net revenue originating outside the
United States based on shipping point to the customer was
approximately 76% in fiscal 2011.
In fiscal 2011, the approximate share of net revenue by
geographic region follows:
|
|
|
|
|
62% of net revenue originated in Asia-Pacific (China, including
Hong Kong and Taiwan, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia,
Philippines, Singapore and Thailand). Approximately 32% and 16%
of net revenue in fiscal 2011 was derived from operations in
China and Japan, respectively.
|
|
|
|
24% of net revenue originated in the Americas.
|
|
|
|
14% of net revenue originated in Europe.
|
Most of our sales in international markets are made by foreign
sales subsidiaries. In countries with low sales volumes, sales
are made through various representatives and distributors. A
discussion of market risk associated with changes in foreign
currency exchange rates can be found in Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and Risk Factors.
We sell our products primarily through our own sales
organization with a presence in most major connector markets
worldwide. To complement our own sales force, we work with a
network of distributors to serve a broader customer base and
provide a wide variety of supply chain tools and capabilities.
Sales through distributors represented approximately 27% of our
net revenue in fiscal 2011.
We seek to provide each customer
one-to-one
service tailored to their business needs. Our engineers work
collaboratively with customers to develop products for specific
applications. We provide customers the benefit of
state-of-the-art
technology for engineering, design and prototyping, supported by
development centers throughout the world. In addition, most
customers have a single Molex customer service contact and a
specific field salesperson to provide technical product and
application expertise.
Our sales force around the world has access to our customer
relationship management database and our global information
system to provide 24/7 visibility on orders, pricing, contracts,
shipping, inventory and customer programs. We offer a
self-service environment for our customers through our web site
at www.molex.com, so that customers can access our entire
product line, download drawings or 3D models, obtain price
quotes, order samples and track delivery.
Information regarding our operations by reporting segment
appears in Note 21 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Research and
Development
We remain committed to investing in world-class technology
development, particularly in the design and manufacture of
connectors and interconnect systems. Our research and
development activities are directed toward developing technology
innovations, primarily high-speed signal integrity,
miniaturization, higher power delivery, optical signal delivery
and sealed harsh environment connectors that we believe will
deliver the next generation of products. We continue to invest
in new manufacturing processes improve, existing products and
reduce costs. We believe that we are well positioned in
9
the technology industry to help drive innovation and promote
industry standards that will yield innovative and improved
products for customers.
We incurred total research and development costs of
$170.1 million in fiscal 2011, $154.0 million in
fiscal 2010 and $159.2 million in fiscal 2009. We believe
this investment, approximating 4.7% of net revenue, is among the
highest level relative to the largest participants in the
industry and helps us achieve a competitive advantage.
We strive to provide customers with the most advanced
interconnection products through intellectual property
development and participation in industry standards committees.
Our engineers are active in many of these committees, helping
give us a voice in shaping the technologies of the future. In
fiscal 2011, we commercialized approximately 227 new products
and received 370 patents.
We perform a majority of our design and development of connector
products in the United States and Japan, but have additional
product development capabilities in various locations, including
China, Germany, India, Ireland, Korea and Singapore.
Manufacturing
Our core manufacturing expertise includes molding, stamping,
plating and assembly operations. We use state of the art plastic
injection molding machines and metal stamping and forming
presses. We have created new processes to meet the ongoing
challenge of manufacturing smaller connectors. We have also
developed proprietary plated plastic technology, which provides
excellent shielding performance while eliminating secondary
manufacturing processes in applications such as mobile phone
antennas.
We also have expertise in printed circuit card, flexible circuit
and harness assembly for our integrated products operations,
which build devices that leverage our connector content. We
operate low-cost manufacturing centers in China, India,
Malaysia, Mexico, Poland, Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam to
reduce our manufacturing costs and align our footprint with our
customers needs.
Continuous improvements achieved through a global lean/six sigma
program have reduced our manufacturing costs and improved our
quality and delivery. A trend of fewer but larger factories,
such as our one million square foot facility in Chengdu, China,
provides increasing economies of scale and efficiencies.
Raw
Materials
The principal raw materials that we purchase for the manufacture
of our products include plastic resins for molding, metal alloys
(primarily copper based) for stamping and gold and palladium
salts for use in the plating process. We also purchase molded
and stamped components and connector assemblies. Most materials
and components used in our products are available from several
sources. To achieve economies of scale, we concentrate purchases
from a limited number of suppliers, and therefore in the short
term may be dependent upon certain suppliers to meet performance
and quality specifications and delivery schedules. We use
financial instruments to hedge the volatility of commodity
material costs. We anticipate that our raw material expenditures
as a percentage of sales may increase due to growth in our
integrated products business and increases in certain commodity
costs.
Backlog
The backlog of unfilled orders at June 30, 2011 was
approximately $418.5 million compared with backlog of
$473.0 million at June 30, 2010. Substantially all of
these orders are scheduled for delivery within 12 months.
The majority of orders are shipped within 30 days of
acceptance.
10
Employees
As of June 30, 2011, we had approximately
33,000 people working for us worldwide. Approximately 75%
of these people were located in low labor cost countries. We
believe that we have strong relations with our employees.
Acquisitions and
Investments
Our strategy to provide a broad range of connectors requires a
wide variety of technologies, products and capabilities. The
rapid pace of technological development in the connector
industry and the specialized expertise required in different
markets make it difficult for a single company to organically
develop all of the required products. Though a significant
majority of our growth has come from internally developed
products, we will seek to make future acquisitions or
investments where we believe we can stimulate the development
of, or acquire, new technologies and products to further our
strategic objectives and strengthen our existing businesses.
Information regarding our acquisitions appears in Note 5 of
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Intellectual
Property
Patents, trade secrets and trademarks and other proprietary
rights (collectively, Intellectual Property) are important to
our business. We own an extensive portfolio of U.S. and
foreign patents and trademarks. In addition, we are a licensee
of various third-party patents and trademarks. We review
third-party Intellectual Property in an effort to avoid
infringements of third-party Intellectual Property rights and to
identify desirable third-party Intellectual Property rights to
license to advance our business objectives. We also review our
competitors products to identify infringements of our
Intellectual Property rights and to identify licensing
opportunities for our Intellectual Property rights. We believe
that our Intellectual Property is important to our business, but
do not consider ourselves materially dependent upon any
particular piece of Intellectual Property.
Environmental,
Health & Safety (EHS) Matters
We are committed to achieving high standards of environmental
quality and product safety, and strive to provide a safe and
healthy workplace for our employees, contractors and the
communities in which we do business. We have EHS policies and
disciplines that are applied to our operations. We closely
monitor the environmental laws and regulations in the countries
in which we operate and believe we are in compliance in all
material respects with federal, state and local regulations
pertaining to environmental protection.
All major Molex manufacturing sites are certified to the
International Organization for Standardization 14001
environmental management system standard, which requires that a
broad range of environmental processes and policies be in place
to minimize environmental impact, maintain compliance with
environmental regulations and communicate effectively with
interested stakeholders. In addition, many sites globally are
Occupational Health and Safety Assessment Series 18001
certified Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems,
which is intended to manage occupational health and safety risks
and drive continual health and safety improvement within our
operations. Our corporate social responsibility auditing program
includes not only compliance components, but also modules on
business risk, environmental excellence and management systems.
We have internal processes that focus on minimizing and properly
managing hazardous materials used in our facilities and
products. We monitor regulatory and resource trends and set
short and long-term targets to continually improve our
environmental performance.
The manufacture, assembly and testing of our products are
subject to a broad array of laws and regulations, including
restrictions on the use of hazardous materials. We have a
program for compliance with the European Union Restriction on
Certain Hazardous Substances Directive (RoHS) and similar laws.
11
Executive
Officers
Our executive officers as of July 29, 2011 are set forth in
the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Positions Held with Registrant
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Name
|
|
During the Last Five Years
|
|
Age
|
|
|
Employed
|
|
|
Frederick A. Krehbiel(a)
|
|
Co-Chairman (1999-present); Chief Executive Officer (2004-2005);
Co-Chief Executive Officer (1999-2001).
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
1965(b
|
)
|
John H. Krehbiel, Jr.(a)
|
|
Co-Chairman (1999-present); Co-Chief Executive Officer
(1999-2001).
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
1959(b
|
)
|
Martin P. Slark
|
|
Vice-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (2005-present);
President and Chief Operating Officer (2001-2005).
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
1976
|
|
Liam McCarthy
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer (2005-present); Vice
President of Operations, Europe (2000-2005).
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
1976
|
|
David D. Johnson
|
|
Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
(2005-present).
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Graham C. Brock
|
|
Executive Vice President (2005-present) and President, Global
Sales & Marketing (2006-present) and Regional President,
Europe (2005).
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
1976
|
|
James E. Fleischhacker
|
|
Executive Vice President (2001-present); President, Global
Commercial Products Division (2009-present); President, Global
Transportation Products Division (2007-2009).
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
1984
|
|
Katsumi Hirokawa
|
|
Executive Vice President (2005-present) and President, Global
Micro Products Division (2007-present); Vice President and
President, Asia-Pacific North (2005-2007).
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
1995
|
|
J. Michael Nauman
|
|
Executive Vice President and President, Global Integrated
Products Division (2009-present); Senior Vice President and
President, Global Integrated Products Division (2007-2009);
President, Integrated Products Division, Americas Region
(2005-2007).
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
1994
|
|
Gary J. Matula
|
|
Senior Vice President, Information Systems and Chief Information
Officer (2008-present); Vice President, Information Systems and
Chief Information Officer (2004-2008).
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
1984
|
|
Ana G. Rodriguez
|
|
Senior Vice President, Global Human Resources (2008-present);
Vice President, Co-General Counsel and Secretary (2007-2008);
Secretary (2006).
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
John H. Krehbiel, Jr. and Frederick A. Krehbiel (the Krehbiel
Family) are brothers. The members of the Krehbiel Family may be
considered to be control persons of Molex. The other
executive
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
officers listed above have no relationship, family or otherwise,
to the Krehbiel Family, Molex or each other.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Includes period employed by our predecessor company.
|
Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable
to all employees, officers and directors. The Code of Business
Conduct incorporates our policies and guidelines designed to
deter wrongdoing and to promote honest and ethical conduct and
compliance with applicable laws and regulations. We have also
adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Management
applicable to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and other senior financial
managers. The Code of Ethics sets out our expectations that
financial management produce full, fair, accurate, timely and
understandable disclosure in our filings with the SEC and other
public communications. We intend to post any amendments to or
waivers from the Codes on our web site.
The full text of these Codes is published on the investor
relations page of our web site at www.molex.com.
Available
Information
We file with the SEC our annual report on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K
and all amendments to those reports, proxy statements and
registration statements. You may read and copy any material we
file with the SEC at the SECs Public Reference Room at
100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may
also obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference
Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
In addition, the SEC maintains an internet site at
http://www.sec.gov
that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and
other information regarding issuers, including us, that file
electronically. We make available free of charge on or through
our website at www.molex.com our annual reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K
and amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as
reasonably practicable after we file these materials with the
SEC.
Forward-looking
Statements
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and other documents we file with the SEC contain forward-looking
statements that are based on current expectations, estimates,
forecasts and projections about our future performance, our
business, our beliefs, and our managements assumptions. In
addition, we, or others on our behalf, may make forward-looking
statements in press releases or written statements, or in our
communications and discussions with investors and analysts in
the normal course of business through meetings, web casts, phone
calls, and conference calls. Words such as expect,
anticipate, outlook,
forecast, could, project,
intend, plan, continue,
believe, seek, estimate,
should, may, assume,
potential, variations of such words and similar
expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking
statements. These statements are not guarantees of future
performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties, and
assumptions that are difficult to predict. We describe our
respective risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that could
affect the outcome or results of operations below.
We have based our forward-looking statements on our
managements beliefs and assumptions based on information
available to them at the time the statements are made. We
caution that actual outcomes and results may differ materially
from what is expressed, implied, or forecast by our
forward-looking statements. Reference is made in particular to
forward-looking statements regarding growth strategies, industry
trends, financial results, cost reduction initiatives,
acquisition synergies, manufacturing strategies, product
development and sales, regulatory approvals, competitive
strengths and legal and investigative proceedings. Except as
required under the federal securities laws, we do
13
not have any intention or obligation to update publicly any
forward-looking statements after the filing of this report,
whether as a result of new information, future events, changes
in assumptions, or otherwise.
Risk
Factors
You should carefully consider the risks described below. Such
risks are not the only ones facing our company. Additional risks
and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently
believe to be immaterial may also impair our business
operations. If any of the following risks occur, our business,
financial condition or operating results could be materially
adversely affected.
Risks Relating to
Our Business
We may be
adversely affected by a prolonged economic downturn or economic
uncertainty.
Our business and operating results have been and will continue
to be affected by global economic conditions. As global economic
conditions deteriorate or economic uncertainty increases, our
customers or potential customers may experience deterioration of
their businesses, which may result in the delay or cancellation
of plans to purchase our products. Our sensitivity to economic
cycles and any related fluctuation in the businesses of our
customers or potential customers may have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows.
We may see a
negative effect on our business due to disruptions in financial
markets.
Economic downturns and economic uncertainty generally affect
global credit markets. Financial markets in the United States,
Europe and Asia have been experiencing volatility in security
prices, diminished liquidity and credit availability, rating
downgrades of certain investments and declining valuation of
others. While these conditions have not impaired our ability to
access credit markets and finance our operations, there can be
no assurance that there will not be a further deterioration in
financial markets and confidence in major economies. The
tightening of credit in financial markets may adversely affect
the ability of our customers and suppliers to obtain financing
of significant purchases and operations and this can in turn
have a material adverse affect on our business and results of
operations.
We are dependent
on the success of our customers.
We are dependent on the continued growth, viability and
financial stability of our customers. Our customers generally
are OEMs in the telecommunications, infotech, automotive,
consumer and industrial markets. These industries are subject to
rapid technological change, vigorous competition and short
product life cycles and cyclical and reduced consumer demand
patterns. When our customers are adversely affected by these
factors, we may be similarly affected.
For example, the telecommunications market, which accounted for
approximately 25% of our net revenue in fiscal 2011, has
historically experienced periods of robust capital expenditure
followed by periods of retrenchment and consolidation. The
infotech market, which accounted for 23% of our net revenue in
fiscal 2011, has fluctuated seasonally and is subject to
variations in enterprise spending depending on current economic
and credit conditions. Periodic downturns in our customers
industries can significantly reduce demand for certain of our
products, which could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations, financial position, and cash flows.
We are subject to
continuing pressure to lower our prices.
Over the past several years we have experienced, and we expect
to continue to experience, pressure to lower our prices. In the
last three years, we have experienced annual price erosion
averaging from 3% to 4%. In order to maintain our margins, we
must continue to reduce our costs by
14
similar amounts. Continuing pressures to reduce our prices could
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows.
We face rising
costs of commodity materials.
The cost and availability of certain commodity materials used to
manufacture our products, such as plastic resins, copper-based
metal alloys, gold and palladium salts, molded and stamped
components and connector assemblies, is critical to our success.
The price of many of these raw materials, including copper and
gold, has increased in recent years, and continues to fluctuate.
Gold, which made up approximately 14% of our material cost in
fiscal 2011, has increased in price approximately 56% since
2009. In addition, many of these commodity materials are
produced in a limited number of regions around the world or are
only available from a limited number of suppliers. Volatility in
the prices and shortages of such materials may result in
increased costs and lower operating margins if we are unable to
pass such increased costs through to our customers. Some of our
competitors may be less dependent on these commodity materials
and have less exposure to these volatile commodity costs. Our
results of operations, financial condition and cash flows may be
materially and adversely affected if we have difficulty
obtaining these commodity materials, the quality of available
commodity materials deteriorates, or there are continued
significant price increases for these commodity materials. We
use financial instruments to hedge the volatility of commodity
material costs. The success of our hedging program depends on
accurate forecast of transaction activity in the various
commodity materials. We could experience unanticipated commodity
materials or hedge gains or losses if these forecasts are
inaccurate during periods of volatility.
We face intense
competition in our markets.
Our markets are highly competitive and we expect that both
direct and indirect competition will increase in the future. Our
overall competitive position depends on a number of factors
including the price, quality and performance of our products,
the level of customer service, the development of new technology
and our ability to participate in emerging markets. Within each
of our markets, we encounter direct competition from other
electronic components manufacturers and suppliers ranging in
size from large, diversified manufacturers to small, highly
specialized manufacturers. Competition may intensify from
various U.S. and
non-U.S. competitors
and new market entrants, some of which may be our current
customers. Our markets have continued to become increasingly
concentrated and globalized in recent years, and our major
competitors have significant financial resources and
technological capabilities. Increased competition may result in
price reductions, reduced margins or loss of market share, any
of which could materially and adversely affect our business,
operating results and financial condition.
We are dependent
on new products.
We expect that a significant portion of our future net revenue
will continue to be derived from sales of newly introduced
products. Rapidly changing technology, evolving industry
standards and changes in customer needs characterize the market
for our products. If we fail to modify or improve our products
in response to changes in technology, industry standards or
customer needs, our products could rapidly become less
competitive or obsolete. We must continue to make investments in
research and development in order to continue to develop timely
new products, enhance existing products and achieve market
acceptance for such products. As a result of our need to make
these investments in research and development, our operating
results could be materially affected if our net revenue falls
below expectations. Moreover, there can be no assurance that
development stage products will be successfully completed or, if
developed, will achieve significant customer acceptance.
We may need to license new technologies to respond to
technological change and these licenses may not be available to
us on terms that we can accept or may materially change the
gross profit margin that we are able to obtain on our products.
We may not succeed in adapting our products to new technologies
as they emerge. Development and manufacturing schedules for
technology products
15
are difficult to predict, and there can be no assurance that we
will achieve timely initial customer shipments of new products.
The timely availability of these products in volume and their
acceptance by customers are important to our future success.
We face
manufacturing challenges.
The volume and timing of sales to our customers may vary due to:
variation in demand for our customers products; our
customers attempts to manage their inventory; design
changes; changes in our customers manufacturing strategy;
and consolidations among or acquisitions of customers. Due in
part to these factors, many of our customers do not commit to
long-term production schedules. Our inability to forecast the
level of customer order with certainty makes it difficult to
schedule production and maximize utilization of manufacturing
capacity.
Our industry must provide increasingly rapid product turnaround
for its customers. We generally do not obtain firm, long-term
purchase commitments from our customers and we continue to
experience reduced lead-times in customer orders. Customers may
cancel their orders, change production quantities or delay
production for a number of reasons and such actions could
negatively impact our operating results. In addition, we make
significant operating decisions based on our estimate of
customer requirements. The short-term nature of our
customers commitments and the possibility of rapid changes
in demand for their products reduce our ability to accurately
estimate the future requirements of those customers.
We rely on third-party suppliers for the components used in our
products, and we rely on third-party manufacturers to
manufacture certain of our assemblies and finished products. Our
results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows could
be adversely affected if our third-party suppliers lack
sufficient quality control or if there are significant changes
in their financial or business condition. If our third-party
suppliers fail to deliver products, parts, and components of
sufficient quality on time and at reasonable prices, we could
have difficulties fulfilling our orders, sales and profits could
decline, and our commercial reputation could be damaged.
From time to time, we have underutilized our manufacturing
lines. This excess capacity means we incur increased fixed costs
in our products relative to the net revenue we generate, which
could have an adverse effect on our results of operations,
particularly during economic downturns. If we are unable to
improve utilization levels for these manufacturing lines and
correctly manage capacity, the increased expense levels will
have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations. In addition, some of our manufacturing
lines are located in China or other foreign countries that are
subject to a number of additional risks and uncertainties,
including increasing labor costs and political, social and
economic instability.
We are dependent
on independent distributors to sell and market our
products.
Sales through independent distributors accounted for
approximately 27% of our net revenue in fiscal 2011. Although we
have entered into written agreements with most of the
distributors, the agreements are nonexclusive and generally may
be terminated by either party upon written notice. The
distributors are not within our control, are not obligated to
purchase products from us, and may also sell other lines of
products. We do not assure you that these distributors will
continue their current relationships with us or that they will
not give higher priority to the sale of other products, which
could include products of competitors. A reduction in sales
efforts or discontinuance of sales of our products by the
distributors would lead to reduced sales and could materially
adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations
and business. Selling through indirect channels such as
distributors may limit our contact with the ultimate customers
and our ability to assure customer satisfaction.
We face industry
consolidation.
Many of the industries to which we sell our products, as well as
many of the industries from which we buy materials, have become
increasingly concentrated in recent years, including the
16
telecommunications, infotech, automotive and consumer
electronics industries. Consolidation of customers may lead to
decreased product purchases from us. In addition, as our
customers buy in larger volumes, their volume buying power has
increased, and they may be able to negotiate more favorable
pricing and find alternative sources from which to purchase. Our
materials suppliers similarly have increased their ability to
negotiate favorable pricing. These trends may adversely affect
the profit margins on our products, particularly for commodity
components.
We depend on
industries exposed to rapid technological change.
Our customers compete in markets that are characterized by
rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards and
continuous improvements in products and services. These
conditions frequently result in short product life cycles. Our
success will depend largely on the success achieved by our
customers in developing and marketing their products. If
technologies or standards supported by our customers
products become obsolete or fail to gain widespread commercial
acceptance, our business could be materially adversely affected.
In addition, if we are unable to offer technologically advanced,
cost effective, quick response manufacturing services to
customers, demand for our products may also decline.
We face the
possibility that our gross margins may decline.
In response to changes in product mix, competitive pricing
pressures, increased sales discounts, introductions of new
competitive products, product enhancements by our competitors,
increases in manufacturing or labor costs or other operating
expenses, we may experience declines in prices, gross margins
and profitability. To maintain our gross margins we must
maintain or increase current shipment volumes, develop and
introduce new products and product enhancements and reduce the
costs to produce our products. If we are unable to accomplish
this, our net revenue, gross profit and operating results may be
below our expectations and those of investors and analysts.
We face risks
associated with inventory.
The value of our inventory may decline as a result of surplus
inventory, price reductions or technological obsolescence. The
life cycles of some of our products can be very short compared
with the development cycle, which may result in excess or
obsolete inventory or equipment that we may need to write off.
We must identify the right product mix and maintain sufficient
inventory on hand to meet customer orders. Failure to do so
could adversely affect our net revenue and operating results.
However, if circumstances change (for example, an unexpected
shift in market demand, pricing or customer defaults) there
could be a material impact on the net realizable value of our
inventory. We maintain an inventory valuation reserve account
against diminution in the value or salability of our inventory.
However, there is no guaranty that these arrangements will be
sufficient to avoid write-offs in excess of our reserves in all
circumstances.
We may encounter
problems associated with our global operations.
For fiscal year 2011, approximately 76% of our net revenue came
from international sales, including 32% and 16% in China and
Japan, respectively. In addition, a significant portion of our
operations consists of manufacturing activities outside of the
United States, including approximately 26% and 20% in China and
Japan, respectively. Our ability to sell our products and
conduct our operations globally is subject to a number of risks.
Local economic, political and labor conditions in each country
could adversely affect demand for our products and services or
disrupt our operations in these markets. We may also experience
reduced intellectual property protection or longer and more
challenging collection cycles as a result of different customary
business practices in certain countries, including China where
we do business. Additionally, we face the following risks:
|
|
|
|
|
International business conditions including the relationships
between the United States and other governments;
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
Unexpected changes in laws, regulations, trade, monetary or
fiscal policy, including interest rates, foreign currency
exchange rates and changes in the rate of inflation in the
United States and other foreign countries;
|
|
|
|
Tariffs, quotas, customs and other import or export restrictions
and other trade barriers;
|
|
|
|
Difficulties in staffing and management;
|
|
|
|
Language and cultural barriers, including those related to
employment regulation;
|
|
|
|
Disruption of our supply chain as a result of natural
disasters; and
|
|
|
|
Potentially adverse tax consequences.
|
We are exposed to
fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
We face substantial exposure to movements in
non-U.S. currency
exchange rates because a significant portion of our business is
conducted outside the United States. This may harm our results
of operations, and any measures that we may implement to reduce
the effect of volatile currencies and other risks of our global
operations may not be effective. Approximately 61% of our net
revenue for fiscal year 2011 was invoiced in currencies other
than the U.S. dollar, and we expect net revenue and
manufacturing costs from
non-U.S. markets
to continue to represent a significant portion of our operating
results. Price increases caused by currency exchange rate
fluctuations may make our products less competitive or have an
adverse effect on our margins. Our international net revenue and
expenses generally are derived from sales and operations in
currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Accordingly, when
the U.S. dollar strengthens in relation to the currencies
of the countries in which we sell our products, our
U.S. dollar reported net revenue and income will decrease.
Currency exchange rate fluctuations may also disrupt the
business of our suppliers by making their purchases of raw
materials more expensive and more difficult to finance. We
mitigate our foreign currency exchange rate risk principally
through the establishment of local production facilities in the
markets we serve. This creates a natural hedge since
purchases and sales within a specific country are both
denominated in the same currency and therefore no exposure
exists to hedge with a foreign exchange forward or option
contract (collectively, foreign exchange contracts).
Natural hedges exist in most countries in which we operate,
although the percentage of natural offsets, as compared with
offsets that need to be hedged by foreign exchange contracts,
will vary from country to country. To reduce our exposure to
fluctuations in currency exchange rates when natural hedges are
not effective, we may use financial instruments to hedge
U.S. dollar and other currency commitments and cash flows
arising from trade accounts receivable, trade accounts payable
and fixed purchase obligations.
If these hedging activities are not successful or we change or
reduce these hedging activities in the future, we may experience
significant unexpected expenses from fluctuations in exchange
rates or financial instruments which become ineffective. The
success of our hedging program depends on accurate forecasts of
transaction activity in the various currencies. To the extent
that these forecasts are over or understated during periods of
currency volatility, we could experience unanticipated currency
or hedge gains or losses.
We may find that
our products have quality issues.
The fabrication of the products we manufacture is a complex and
precise process. Our customers specify quality, performance and
reliability standards. If flaws in either the design or
manufacture of our products were to occur, we could experience a
rate of failure in our products that could result in significant
delays in shipment and product re-work or replacement costs.
Although we engage in extensive product quality programs and
processes, these may not be sufficient to avoid product
failures, which could cause us to:
|
|
|
|
|
lose net revenue;
|
|
|
|
incur increased costs such as warranty expense and costs
associated with customer support;
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
experience delays, cancellations or rescheduling of orders for
our products;
|
|
|
|
experience increased product returns or discounts; or
|
|
|
|
damage our reputation; all of which could negatively affect our
financial condition and results of operations.
|
If we fail to
manage our growth effectively or to integrate successfully any
future acquisition, our business could be harmed.
We expect to continue to make investments in companies, products
and technologies through acquisitions. While we believe that
such acquisitions are an integral part of our long-term
strategy, there are risks and uncertainties related to acquiring
companies. Such risks and uncertainties include:
|
|
|
|
|
Successfully identifying and completing transactions;
|
|
|
|
Difficulty in integrating acquired operations, technology and
products or realizing cost savings or other anticipated benefits
from integration;
|
|
|
|
Retaining customers and existing contracts;
|
|
|
|
Retaining the key employees of the acquired operation;
|
|
|
|
Potential disruption of our or the acquired companys
ongoing business;
|
|
|
|
Charges for impairment of long-term assets;
|
|
|
|
Unanticipated expenses related to integration; and
|
|
|
|
Potential unknown liabilities associated with the acquired
company.
|
In addition, if we were to undertake a substantial acquisition
for cash, the acquisition would likely need to be financed in
part through additional financing from banks, through public
offerings or private placements of debt or equity securities, or
other arrangements. This acquisition financing might decrease
our ratio of earnings to fixed charges and adversely affect
other leverage measures. Any necessary acquisition financing may
not be available to us on acceptable terms if and when required.
If we undertake an acquisition by issuing equity securities or
equity-linked securities, the issued securities may have a
dilutive effect on the interests of the holders of our stock.
We face risks
arising from reorganizations of our operations.
In 2007, we announced plans to realign part of our manufacturing
capacity in order to reduce costs and better optimize plant
utilization. We completed our restructuring program on
June 30, 2010 and recorded restructuring related charges of
$314.8 million since we announced the plans. The process of
restructuring entails, among other activities, moving production
between facilities, reducing staff levels, realigning our
business processes (including our supply chain logistics),
closing facilities and reorganizing our management. We continue
to evaluate our operations and may need to undertake additional
restructuring initiatives in the future. If we incur additional
restructuring related charges, our financial condition and
results of operations may be adversely affected.
In addition, in fiscal 2009, we reorganized our global product
divisions to enable us to work more effectively as a global team
to meet customer needs, as well as to better leverage design
expertise and the low-cost production centers we have around the
world. This reorganization entails risks, including: the need to
implement financial and other systems and add management
resources; the challenge to maintain the quality of products and
services; the possible diversion of managements attention
to the reorganization; the potential disruption to our ongoing
business; greater than anticipated severance costs and other
expenses associated with the closing of a facility or realigning
our business processes.
19
We depend on our
key employees and face competition in hiring and retaining
qualified employees.
Our future success depends partly on the continued contribution
of our key employees, including executive, engineering, sales,
marketing, manufacturing and administrative personnel. We face
intense competition for key personnel in several of our product
and geographic markets. Our future success depends in large part
on our continued ability to hire, assimilate and retain key
employees, including qualified engineers and other highly
skilled personnel needed to compete and develop successful new
products. We may not be as successful as competitors at
recruiting, assimilating and retaining highly skilled personnel.
We are subject to
various laws and government regulations.
We are subject to a wide and ever-changing variety of United
States and foreign federal, state and local laws and
regulations, compliance with which may require substantial
expense. Of particular note are laws and regulations restricting
the use of certain chemical substances in the production of
electronic equipment. Failure to comply with these requirements
could result in fines or suspension of sales.
In addition, some environmental laws impose liability, sometimes
without fault, for investigating or cleaning up contamination on
or emanating from our currently or formerly owned, leased or
operated property, as well as for damages to property or natural
resources and for personal injury arising out of such
contamination.
We rely on our
intellectual property rights.
We rely on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks and
trade secrets and confidentiality provisions to establish and
protect our proprietary rights. To this end, we hold rights to a
number of patents and registered trademarks and regularly file
applications to attempt to protect our rights in new technology
and trademarks. Even if approved, our patents or trademarks may
be successfully challenged by others or otherwise become
invalidated for a variety of reasons. Also, to the extent a
competitor is able to reproduce or otherwise capitalize on our
intellectual property, it may be difficult, expensive or
impossible for us to obtain necessary legal protection.
Third parties may claim that we are infringing their
intellectual property rights. Such claims could have an adverse
affect on our business and financial condition. From time to
time we receive letters alleging infringement of patents.
Litigation concerning patents or other intellectual property is
costly and time consuming. We may seek licenses from such
parties, but they could refuse to grant us a license or demand
commercially unreasonable terms. Such infringement claims could
also cause us to incur substantial liabilities and to suspend or
permanently cease the manufacture and sale of affected products.
We could suffer
significant business interruptions.
Our operations and those of our suppliers and customers may be
vulnerable to interruption by natural disasters such as
earthquakes, tsunamis, typhoons, or floods, or other disasters
such as fires, explosions, acts of terrorism or war, disease or
failures of our management information or other systems due to
internal or external causes. If a business interruption occurs,
our business could be materially and adversely affected.
On March 11, 2011, an earthquake occurred near the
northeastern coast of Japan creating a tsunami that caused
extensive damage. Thus far, our operations have not been
materially affected. However, the long-term consequences of the
disasters to our operations and the overall Japanese economy
remain unclear.
20
A decline in the
market value of our pension plans investment portfolios
could adversely affect our results of operations, financial
condition and cash flows.
Concerns about deterioration in the global economy, together
with the current credit crisis, have caused significant
volatility in interest rates and equity prices, which could
decrease the value of our pension plans investment
portfolios. A decrease in the value of our pension plans
investment portfolios could have an adverse affect on our
results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We may have
exposure to income tax rate fluctuations and to additional tax
liabilities, which could negatively affect our financial
position.
As a corporation with operations both in the United States and
abroad, we are subject to income taxes in the United States and
various foreign jurisdictions. Our effective tax rate is subject
to significant fluctuation from one period to the next because
the income tax rates for each year are a function of a number of
factors, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The effects of a mix of earnings among countries with a broad
range of statutory tax rates;
|
|
|
|
Changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities;
|
|
|
|
Changes in assessment of tax exposures; and
|
|
|
|
Changes in tax laws or the interpretation of these laws.
|
Changes in the mix of these items and other items may cause our
effective tax rate to fluctuate between periods, which could
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and
financial condition.
In addition, if we encounter a significant need for liquidity
domestically or at a particular location that we cannot fulfill
through borrowings, equity offerings, or other internal or
external sources, we may experience unfavorable tax and earnings
consequences due to cash transfers. These adverse consequences
would occur, for example, if the transfer of cash into the
United States is taxed and no offsetting foreign tax credit is
available to offset the U.S. tax liability, resulting in
lower earnings. Foreign exchange ceilings imposed by local
governments and the sometimes lengthy approval processes that
foreign governments require for international cash transfers may
delay our internal cash transfers from time to time.
We are also subject to non-income taxes, such as payroll, sales,
use, value-added, net worth, property and goods and services
taxes, in both the United States and various foreign
jurisdictions.
Significant judgment is required in determining our provision
for income taxes and other tax liabilities. Although we believe
our tax estimates are reasonable, we are regularly under audit
by tax authorities with respect to both income and non-income
taxes and may have exposure to additional tax liabilities as a
result of these audits. Unfavorable audit findings and tax
rulings may result in payment of taxes, fines and penalties for
prior periods and higher tax rates in future periods, which may
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and
financial condition.
An adverse
outcome in a litigation proceeding may result in a material
adverse affect on our financial position.
We are currently a party to various legal proceedings which may
divert financial and management resources. If one or more
unfavorable final outcomes were to occur, there exists the
possibility of a material adverse effect on our financial
position.
21
Covenants in our
debt instruments may adversely affect us if we are determined
not to be in compliance.
Our material debt instruments contain representations and
covenants with which we are required to be in compliance.
Although we believe none of these covenants are restrictive to
our operations, our ability to meet these representations
and/or
covenants can be affected by events beyond our control, and we
do not assure you that we will continue to comply. A breach of
any of these representations
and/or
covenants could result in a default giving the lender(s) the
right to declare all amounts outstanding thereunder to be
immediately due and payable and our lender(s) could terminate
commitments to extend further credit. If the lender(s)
accelerate the repayment of borrowings, we do not assure you
that we will have sufficient assets to repay our affected
indebtedness. In addition, acceleration of any debt obligation
under any of our material debt instruments may permit the
lender(s) under other material debt instruments to accelerate
payment of amounts outstanding.
Our certificate
of incorporation and bylaws include antitakeover provisions,
which may deter or prevent a takeover attempt.
Some provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws
may deter or prevent a takeover attempt, including a takeover
that might result in a premium over the market price for our
Common Stock and Class A Common Stock. Our governing
documents establish a classified board, require shareholders to
give advance notice prior to the annual meeting if they want to
nominate a candidate for director or present a proposal, and
contain a number of provisions subject to supermajority vote. In
addition, the Board may issue up to 25,000,000 shares of
preferred stock without action by our stockholders, which could
be used to make it more difficult and costly to acquire our
company.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None.
We own and lease manufacturing, design, warehousing, sales and
administrative space in locations around the world. The leases
are of varying terms with expirations ranging from fiscal 2011
through fiscal 2020. The leases in aggregate are not considered
material to the financial position of Molex.
As of June 30, 2011, we owned or leased a total of
approximately 9.9 million square feet of facility space
worldwide. We have vacated several buildings in France, Germany
and Slovakia and are holding these buildings and related assets
for sale. We own 88% of our manufacturing, design, warehouse and
office space and lease the remaining 12%. Our manufacturing
plants are equipped with machinery, most of which we own and
which, in part, we developed to meet the special requirements of
our manufacturing processes. We believe that our buildings,
machinery and equipment are well maintained and adequate for our
current needs.
Our principal executive offices are located at 2222 Wellington
Court, Lisle, Illinois, United States of America. We own 39
manufacturing locations, of which 13 are located in North
America and 26 are located in other countries. A listing of the
locations of our principal manufacturing facilities by
geographic region is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
Americas: Mexico and United States
|
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific: Australia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia,
Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam
|
|
|
|
Europe: Ireland, Italy and Poland
|
22
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
We are currently a party to various legal proceedings, claims
and investigations including those disclosed in Note 20 of
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. While management
presently believes that the ultimate outcome of these
proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will not
materially adversely affect our financial position or overall
trends in operations, legal proceedings are subject to inherent
uncertainties, and unfavorable rulings or other events could
occur. If one or more unfavorable final outcomes were to occur,
then there exists the possibility of a material adverse effect
on our business.
Employment and
Benefits Litigation
In 2009, a French subsidiary of Molex, Molex Automotive SARL,
decided to close a facility it operated in Villemur-sur-Tarn,
France. Molex Automotive SARL submitted a social plan to Molex
Automotive SARLs labor representatives providing for
payments to approximately 280 terminated employees. This social
plan was adopted by Molex Automotive SARL in 2009, which made
payments to those employees until September 2010. In September
2010, former employees of Molex Automotive SARL who were covered
under the social plan filed suit against Molex Automotive SARL
in the Toulouse Labor Court, requesting additional compensation
on the basis that their dismissal was not economically
justified. The total amount sought by the former employees of
Molex Automotive SARL is approximately 24 million
($34.8 million). Molex initiated liquidation of Molex
Automotive SARL, and pursuant to a court proceeding, a
liquidator was appointed in November 2010. One of the
liquidators responsibilities is to assess and respond to
the lawsuits involving Molex Automotive SARL. In June 2011,
Molex Incorporated received notice that it had been added as a
defendant in the Toulouse Labor Court proceedings and is
requested to attend a hearing on October 20, 2011. We
intend to vigorously contest the attempt by the former employees
to seek compensation from Molex Incorporated.
Molex Japan Co.,
Ltd
As we previously reported in our fiscal 2010 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
we launched an investigation into unauthorized activities at
Molex Japan Co., Ltd. in April 2010. We learned that an
individual working in Molex Japans finance group obtained
unauthorized loans from third party lenders, that included in at
least one instance the attempted unauthorized pledge of Molex
Japan facilities as security, in Molex Japans name that
were used to cover losses resulting from unauthorized trading,
including margin trading, in Molex Japans name. We also
learned that the individual misappropriated funds from Molex
Japans accounts to cover losses from unauthorized trading.
The individual admitted to forging documentation in arranging
and concealing the transactions. We retained outside legal
counsel, and they retained forensic accountants, to investigate
the matter. The investigation has been completed.
On August 31, 2010, Mizuho Bank (Mizuho), which
holds the unauthorized loans, filed a complaint in Tokyo
District Court requesting the court to find Molex Japan liable
for the payment of the outstanding unauthorized loans and to
enter a judgment for such payment. Mizuho is claiming payment of
outstanding principal borrowings of ¥3 billion
($37.2 million), ¥5 billion ($62.1 million),
¥5 billion ($62.1 million) and
¥2 billion ($24.8 million), other loan-related
expenses of approximately ¥106 million
($1.3 million) and interest and delay damages of
approximately ¥2.5 billion ($31.2 million) as of
June 30, 2011. On October 13, 2010, Molex Japan filed
a written answer requesting the court to dismiss the complaint,
Mizuho filed plaintiffs brief no. 1 on
December 15, 2010, Molex Japan filed defendants brief
no. 1 on February 16, 2011 and Mizuho filed
plaintiffs brief no. 2 on April 20, 2011. Molex
Japan filed defendants brief no. 2 on June 28,
2011 and the court instructed Mizuho to file a reply brief by
the end of August. We intend to vigorously contest the
enforceability of the outstanding unauthorized loans and any
attempt by the lender to obtain payment. See Note 3 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for accounting
treatment of the accrual for unauthorized activities in Japan.
23
As we reported on April 29, 2011, the SEC informed us that
the SEC has issued a formal order of private investigation in
connection with the activities in Molex Japan Co., Ltd. We are
fully cooperating with the SECs investigation.
|
|
Item 4.
|
[REMOVED
AND RESERVED]
|
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for the Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Molex Incorporated is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
and on the London Stock Exchange and trades under the symbols
MOLX for Common Stock and MOLXA for Class A Common Stock.
Molex Class B Common Stock is not publicly traded.
The number of stockholders of record at June 30, 2011 was
2,182 for Common Stock, 7,922 for Class A Common Stock and
14 for Class B Common Stock.
The following table presents quarterly stock prices for the
fiscal years ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Low High
|
|
Low High
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
1st
|
|
|
$
|
17.65
|
|
|
$
|
21.10
|
|
|
$
|
14.18
|
|
|
$
|
21.51
|
|
|
|
|
2nd
|
|
|
|
20.18
|
|
|
|
23.02
|
|
|
|
18.56
|
|
|
|
22.28
|
|
|
|
|
3rd
|
|
|
|
23.01
|
|
|
|
28.22
|
|
|
|
19.58
|
|
|
|
22.59
|
|
|
|
|
4th
|
|
|
|
24.22
|
|
|
|
27.95
|
|
|
|
18.24
|
|
|
|
23.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Low High
|
|
Low High
|
|
Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
1st
|
|
|
$
|
15.03
|
|
|
$
|
17.79
|
|
|
$
|
13.34
|
|
|
$
|
19.52
|
|
|
|
|
2nd
|
|
|
|
16.87
|
|
|
|
19.08
|
|
|
|
16.37
|
|
|
|
19.89
|
|
|
|
|
3rd
|
|
|
|
19.20
|
|
|
|
23.47
|
|
|
|
17.13
|
|
|
|
19.96
|
|
|
|
|
4th
|
|
|
|
20.22
|
|
|
|
23.32
|
|
|
|
15.45
|
|
|
|
19.68
|
|
Cash dividends on common stock have been paid every year since
1977. The following table presents quarterly dividends declared
per share of Common Stock, Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock for the fiscal years ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Quarter ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
$
|
0.1525
|
|
|
$
|
0.1525
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
0.1750
|
|
|
|
0.1525
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
0.1750
|
|
|
|
0.1525
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
0.2000
|
|
|
|
0.1525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
0.7025
|
|
|
$
|
0.6100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, 95,222 shares
of Class A Common Stock were transferred to us from certain
employees to pay either the purchase price
and/or
withholding taxes on the vesting of restricted stock or the
exercise of stock options. The aggregate market value of the
shares transferred totaled $2.1 million. Share purchases of
Molex Common
and/or
Class A Common
24
Stock for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 were as follows
(in thousands, except price per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
|
Purchased*
|
|
|
Paid per Share
|
|
|
Announced Plan
|
|
|
April 1 April 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
$
|
21.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1 May 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
1,560
|
|
|
$
|
22.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 1 June 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
22.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,087
|
|
|
$
|
21.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
The shares purchased include exercises of employee stock options.
|
Descriptions of our Common Stock appear under the caption
Molex Stock in our 2011 Proxy Statement and in
Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
25
Performance
Graph
The performance graph set forth below shows the value of an
investment of $100 on June 30, 2006 in each of Molex Common
Stock, Molex Class A Common Stock, the S&P 500 Index,
and a Peer Group Index. The Peer Group Index includes
50 companies (including Molex) classified in the Global
Sub-industry
Classifications Electronic Equipment and
Instruments, Electronic Manufacturing
Services, and Technology Distributors. All
values assume reinvestment of the pre-tax value of dividends
paid by Molex and the companies included in these indices, and
are calculated as of June 30 of each year. The historical stock
price performance of Molexs Common Stock and Class A
Common Stock is not necessarily indicative of future stock price
performance.
Comparison of
Five-Year Cumulative Total Return
(Value of Investment of $100 on June 30, 2006)
Among Molex Incorporated, the S&P 500 Index
and a Peer Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
06/30/06
|
|
|
06/30/07
|
|
|
06/30/08
|
|
|
06/30/09
|
|
|
06/30/10
|
|
|
06/30/11
|
Molex Incorporated Common
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
90.24
|
|
|
|
|
74.69
|
|
|
|
|
49.43
|
|
|
|
|
59.71
|
|
|
|
|
86.92
|
|
Molex Incorporated Class A
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
93.41
|
|
|
|
|
82.11
|
|
|
|
|
53.76
|
|
|
|
|
59.75
|
|
|
|
|
86.11
|
|
S&P 500
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
120.59
|
|
|
|
|
104.77
|
|
|
|
|
77.30
|
|
|
|
|
88.46
|
|
|
|
|
115.61
|
|
Peer Group
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
119.84
|
|
|
|
|
107.58
|
|
|
|
|
71.28
|
|
|
|
|
88.62
|
|
|
|
|
128.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
Molex
Incorporated
Five-Year Financial Highlights Summary
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
3,587,334
|
|
|
$
|
3,007,207
|
|
|
$
|
2,581,841
|
|
|
$
|
3,328,347
|
|
|
$
|
3,265,874
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,088,137
|
|
|
|
892,623
|
|
|
|
656,177
|
|
|
|
1,014,235
|
|
|
|
1,016,708
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
430,199
|
|
|
|
137,802
|
|
|
|
(348,881
|
)
|
|
|
313,233
|
|
|
|
312,137
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
429,939
|
|
|
|
131,489
|
|
|
|
(321,573
|
)
|
|
|
333,931
|
|
|
|
328,844
|
|
Net income (loss)(1)
|
|
|
298,808
|
|
|
|
76,930
|
|
|
|
(322,036
|
)
|
|
|
215,720
|
|
|
|
245,744
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
(1.84
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
|
$
|
1.34
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1.70
|
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
(1.84
|
)
|
|
|
1.19
|
|
|
|
1.32
|
|
Net income (loss) percent of net revenue
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)%
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
262,246
|
|
|
$
|
229,477
|
|
|
$
|
177,943
|
|
|
$
|
234,626
|
|
|
$
|
296,861
|
|
Financial Position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
2,055,345
|
|
|
$
|
1,775,821
|
|
|
$
|
1,507,058
|
|
|
$
|
1,841,472
|
|
|
$
|
1,648,259
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
882,047
|
|
|
|
912,696
|
|
|
|
884,893
|
|
|
|
817,803
|
|
|
|
697,289
|
|
Working capital(2)
|
|
|
1,173,298
|
|
|
|
863,125
|
|
|
|
622,165
|
|
|
|
1,023,669
|
|
|
|
950,970
|
|
Current ratio(3)
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
1,168,448
|
|
|
$
|
1,055,144
|
|
|
$
|
1,080,417
|
|
|
$
|
1,172,395
|
|
|
$
|
1,121,370
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
3,597,852
|
|
|
|
3,236,578
|
|
|
|
3,011,586
|
|
|
|
3,667,272
|
|
|
|
3,386,262
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
222,794
|
|
|
|
183,434
|
|
|
|
30,311
|
|
|
|
146,333
|
|
|
|
127,821
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,368,266
|
|
|
|
1,985,131
|
|
|
|
1,961,252
|
|
|
|
2,576,216
|
|
|
|
2,426,832
|
|
Dividends declared per share
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
Average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
174,812
|
|
|
|
173,803
|
|
|
|
174,598
|
|
|
|
180,474
|
|
|
|
183,961
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
175,943
|
|
|
|
174,660
|
|
|
|
174,598
|
|
|
|
181,395
|
|
|
|
185,565
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Operating results include the following by year (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
After-tax restructuring costs and asset impairments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
92,835
|
|
|
$
|
111,798
|
|
|
$
|
20,988
|
|
|
$
|
30,255
|
|
Goodwill impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After-tax net unauthorized activities in Japan
|
|
|
10,061
|
|
|
|
17,128
|
|
|
|
1,712
|
|
|
|
3,007
|
|
|
|
6,001
|
|
See Notes 3, 6 and 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for a discussion of unauthorized activities in Japan,
restructuring costs and asset impairments.
|
|
(2)
|
Working capital is defined as current assets minus current
liabilities.
|
|
(3)
|
Current ratio is defined as current assets divided by current
liabilities.
|
27
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains
forward-looking statements relating to future events or the
future financial performance of Molex, which involve risks and
uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from
those anticipated in these forward-looking statements. Please
see the discussion regarding forward-looking statements included
under Item 1A, Risk Factors for a discussion of
the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these
statements.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements and the related notes and
other financial information appearing elsewhere in this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
All references to fiscal years relate to the fiscal year ended
June 30.
Overview
Our
Business
Our core business is the manufacture and sale of electronic
components. Our products are used by a large number of leading
original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) throughout the world. We
design, manufacture and sell more than 100,000 different
products including terminals, connectors, planar cables, cable
assemblies, interconnection systems, backplanes, integrated
products and mechanical and electronic switches in 39
manufacturing locations in 16 countries. We also provide
manufacturing services to integrate specific components into a
customers product.
We have two global product segments: Connector and
Custom & Electrical.
|
|
|
|
|
The Connector segment designs and manufactures products for
high-speed, high-density, high signal-integrity applications as
well as fine-pitch, low-profile connectors for the consumer and
commercial markets. It also designs and manufactures products
that withstand environments such as heat, cold, dust, dirt,
liquid and vibration for automotive and other transportation
applications.
|
|
|
|
The Custom & Electrical segment designs and
manufactures integrated and customizable electronic components
across all industries that provide original, differentiated
solutions to customer requirements. It also leverages expertise
in the use of signal, power and interface technology in
industrial automation and other harsh environment applications.
|
We sell our products in five primary markets. Our connectors,
interconnecting devices and assemblies are used principally in
the telecommunications, infotech, consumer, industrial and
automotive markets. Our products are used in a wide range of
applications including desktop and notebook computers, computer
peripheral equipment, mobile phones, digital electronics such as
cameras and flat panel display televisions, automobile engine
control units and adaptive braking systems, factory robotics and
diagnostic equipment.
Net revenue by market can fluctuate based on various factors
including new technologies within the industry, composition of
customers and changes in their net revenue levels and new
products or
28
model changes that we or our customers introduce. The following
table sets forth, for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009 the percentage
relationship to net revenue of our sales by primary markets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Net Revenue
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Telecommunications
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
Infotech
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Industrial
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Automotive
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth, for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009,
the percentage relationship to net revenue of our sales by
geographic region:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
24.3
|
%
|
|
|
24.4
|
%
|
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
61.3
|
|
|
|
59.8
|
|
|
|
54.4
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth, for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009,
the percentage relationship to net revenue of our sales by
reporting segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Connector
|
|
|
72.5
|
%
|
|
|
72.4
|
%
|
|
|
69.3
|
%
|
Custom & Electrical
|
|
|
27.5
|
|
|
|
27.5
|
|
|
|
30.6
|
|
Corporate & Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We sell our products directly to OEMs and to their contract
manufacturers and suppliers and, to a lesser extent, through
distributors worldwide. Many of our customers are multi-national
corporations that manufacture their products in multiple
operations in several countries.
In fiscal 2011, 61.3% of our net revenue was derived from sales
in the Asia-Pacific region. We expect greater economic growth in
Asia, particularly in China, than in the Americas and Europe. We
continue to expand our manufacturing operations in lower cost
regions. Approximately 56% of our manufacturing capacity is in
lower cost areas such as China, Eastern Europe and Mexico. In
addition, reduced trade barriers and improved supply chain
logistics have reduced our need to duplicate regional
manufacturing capabilities. For these reasons, we have
consolidated multiple plants of modest size and established a
strategy of operating fewer, larger and more integrated
facilities in select locations. We believe that our business is
positioned to benefit from this strategy.
Business
Environment
The market in which we operate is highly fragmented with a
limited number of large companies and a significant number of
smaller companies making electronic connectors. We are one of
the worlds largest manufacturers of electronic connectors.
We believe that our global presence and our ability to design
and manufacture our products throughout the world and to service
our customers globally is a key advantage for us. Our growth has
come primarily from new products that we develop, often in
collaboration with our customers.
29
The markets in which we compete are highly competitive. Our
financial results are influenced by factors in the markets in
which we operate and by our ability to successfully execute our
business strategy. Marketplace factors include competition for
customers, raw material prices, product and price competition,
economic conditions in various geographic regions, foreign
currency exchange rates, interest rates, changes in technology,
fluctuations in customer demand, patent and intellectual
property issues, natural disasters, litigation results and legal
and regulatory developments. Our ability to execute our business
strategy successfully will require that we meet a number of
challenges, including our ability to accurately forecast sales
demand and calibrate manufacturing to such demand, manage
volatile raw material costs, develop, manufacture and
successfully market new and enhanced products and product lines,
control operating costs, and attract, motivate and retain key
personnel to manage our operational, financial and management
information systems. Our sales are also dependent on end markets
impacted by consumer, industrial and infrastructure spending and
our operating results can be adversely affected by reduced
demand in these end markets.
Non-GAAP Financial
Measures
Organic net revenue growth, which is included in
Managements Discussion & Analysis, is a non-GAAP
financial measure. The tables presented in Results of Operations
provide reconciliations of U.S. GAAP reported net revenue
growth (the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure) to
organic net revenue growth.
We believe organic net revenue growth provides useful
information to investors because it reflects the underlying
growth from the ongoing activities of our business and provides
investors with a view of our operations from managements
perspective. We use organic net revenue growth to monitor and
evaluate performance, since it is an important measure of the
underlying results of our operations. It excludes items that are
not completely under managements control, such as the
impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, and items
that do not reflect the underlying growth of the company, such
as acquisition activity. Management uses organic net revenue
growth together with GAAP measures such as net revenue and
operating income in its decision making processes related to the
operations of our reporting segments and our overall company.
Because organic net revenue growth calculations may vary among
other companies, organic net sales growth amounts presented
below may not be comparable with similar measures of other
companies.
Unauthorized
Activities in Japan
As we previously reported in our fiscal 2010 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
we launched an investigation into unauthorized activities at
Molex Japan Co., Ltd. in April 2010. We learned that an
individual working in Molex Japans finance group obtained
unauthorized loans from third-party lenders, that included in at
least one instance the attempted unauthorized pledge of Molex
Japan facilities as security, in Molex Japans name that
were used to cover losses resulting from unauthorized trading,
including margin trading, in Molex Japans name. We also
learned that the individual misappropriated funds from Molex
Japans accounts to cover losses from unauthorized trading.
The individual admitted to forging documentation in arranging
and concealing the transactions. We retained outside legal
counsel, and they retained forensic accountants, to investigate
the matter. The investigation has been completed. Based on our
consultation with legal counsel in Japan and the information
learned from the investigation, we intend to vigorously contest
the enforceability of the outstanding unauthorized loans and any
attempt by the lender to obtain payment.
As previously reported in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended June 30, 2010, based on the results of
the completed investigation, we recorded for accounting purposes
an accrued liability for the effect of unauthorized activities
pending the resolution of these matters including the legal
proceedings reported in Note 20 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
We believe these unauthorized activities and related losses
occurred from at least as early as 1988 through 2010, with
approximately $167.4 million of losses occurring prior to
June 30, 2007. The
30
accrued liability for these potential net losses was
$182.5 million as of June 30, 2011, including
$16.6 million in cumulative foreign currency translation,
which was recorded as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income. To the extent we prevail in not having to
pay all or any portion of the outstanding unauthorized loans, we
would recognize a gain in that amount. In addition, we have a
contingent liability of $31.2 million for other
loan-related expenses, interest expense and delay damages on the
outstanding unauthorized loans.
Financial
Highlights
Net revenue for fiscal 2011 of $3.6 billion increased 19.2%
from fiscal 2010. Organic net revenue increased 16.2% in fiscal
2011 compared with fiscal 2010. Income from operations for
fiscal 2011 of $430.2 million increased 212% compared with
fiscal 2010 as we completed our restructuring program on
June 30, 2010. We recognized net income of
$298.8 million in fiscal 2011 compared with net income of
$76.9 million in fiscal 2010. Fiscal 2011 results include a
net loss on unauthorized activities in Japan of
$14.5 million ($10.1 million after-tax). Fiscal 2010
results include restructuring charges of $117.1 million
($92.8 million after-tax) and a net loss on unauthorized
activities in Japan of $26.9 million ($17.1 million
after-tax).
Results of
Operations
The following table sets forth, for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009,
certain consolidated statements of operations data as a
percentage of net revenue (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Net Revenue
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net Revenue
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net Revenue
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
3,587,334
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,007,207
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,581,841
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
2,499,197
|
|
|
|
69.7
|
%
|
|
|
2,114,584
|
|
|
|
70.3
|
%
|
|
|
1,925,664
|
|
|
|
74.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,088,137
|
|
|
|
30.3
|
%
|
|
|
892,623
|
|
|
|
29.7
|
%
|
|
|
656,177
|
|
|
|
25.4
|
%
|
Selling, general & administrative
|
|
|
643,462
|
|
|
|
17.9
|
%
|
|
|
610,784
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
%
|
|
|
586,702
|
|
|
|
22.7
|
%
|
Restructuring costs and asset impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
117,139
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
151,531
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
Unauthorized activities in Japan
|
|
|
14,476
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
26,898
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
2,685
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
Goodwill impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
264,140
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
430,199
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
|
137,802
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
(348,881
|
)
|
|
|
(13.5
|
)%
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(6,313
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
|
27,308
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
429,939
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
|
131,489
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
(321,573
|
)
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)%
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
131,131
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
54,559
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
298,808
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
76,930
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
(322,036
|
)
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
Net
Revenue
The following table provides an analysis of the change in net
revenue compared with the prior fiscal year (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net revenue for prior year
|
|
$
|
3,007,207
|
|
|
$
|
2,581,841
|
|
Components of net revenue increase:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic net revenue increase
|
|
|
488,123
|
|
|
|
334,843
|
|
Currency translation
|
|
|
82,742
|
|
|
|
60,236
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
9,262
|
|
|
|
30,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total change in net revenue from prior year
|
|
|
580,127
|
|
|
|
425,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue for current year
|
|
$
|
3,587,334
|
|
|
$
|
3,007,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic net revenue increase as a percentage of net revenue for
prior year
|
|
|
16.2
|
%
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
Net revenue increased during fiscal 2011 and 2010 as customer
demand improved in all of our primary markets compared with the
prior fiscal years. Excluding the telecommunications market in
fiscal 2010, we experienced double-digit percentage growth in
net revenue in each of our primary markets in fiscal 2011 and
2010 compared with the prior fiscal years.
The increase in net revenue attributed to currency translation
in fiscal 2011 compared with fiscal 2010 was principally due to
a stronger Japanese yen and weaker U.S. dollar against most
currencies except the euro. The increase in net revenue
attributed to currency translation in fiscal 2010 compared with
fiscal 2009 was principally due to stronger Asian currencies.
The following tables show the effect on the change in geographic
net revenue from foreign currency translations to the
U.S. dollar (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
Local
|
|
Currency
|
|
Net
|
|
Local
|
|
Currency
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
Translation
|
|
Change
|
|
Currency
|
|
Translation
|
|
Change
|
|
Americas
|
|
$
|
136,321
|
|
|
$
|
1,073
|
|
|
$
|
137,394
|
|
|
$
|
46,217
|
|
|
$
|
1,384
|
|
|
$
|
47,601
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
301,824
|
|
|
|
96,776
|
|
|
|
398,600
|
|
|
|
336,195
|
|
|
|
58,199
|
|
|
|
394,394
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
59,427
|
|
|
|
(15,107
|
)
|
|
|
44,320
|
|
|
|
(9,355
|
)
|
|
|
653
|
|
|
|
(8,702
|
)
|
Corporate & Other
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
(7,927
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,927
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change
|
|
$
|
497,385
|
|
|
$
|
82,742
|
|
|
$
|
580,127
|
|
|
$
|
365,130
|
|
|
$
|
60,236
|
|
|
$
|
425,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in net revenue on a local currency basis as of June
30 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
18.5
|
%
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
42.3
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
16.5
|
%
|
|
|
16.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue increased across all five primary markets in fiscal
2011 and 2010 compared with prior fiscal periods as customer
demand improved over the prior years. Net revenue in Japan
weakened at the end of fiscal 2011 due to the impact of the
March 11, 2011 earthquake on the Japanese economy.
32
The following table sets forth, for fiscal 2011 and 2010,
changes in net revenue from each of our five primary product
markets from the prior fiscal year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Telecommunications
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Infotech
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Industrial
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Automotive
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Telecommunications market net revenue increased in fiscal 2011
compared with fiscal 2010 due to higher infrastructure spending
and increased demand for mobile products, including higher
demand for smartphones and our customers introduction of
smartphone models with higher connector content.
Telecommunications market net revenue increased in fiscal 2010
compared with fiscal 2009 due to increased infrastructure
spending, higher demand for smartphones and our customers
introduction of smartphone models that include our connector
products, partially offset by a decline in standard feature
mobile phones.
Infotech market net revenue increased in fiscal 2011 compared
with fiscal 2010 primarily due to increased content and demand
for servers, data storage, notebook computers and tablet
devices. Infotech market net revenue for fiscal 2010 increased
significantly compared with fiscal 2009 because of increased
demand for notebooks, storage products, computers and
accessories and depressed enterprise spending in the prior year.
Consumer market net revenue increased in fiscal 2011 compared
with fiscal 2010 primarily due to increased demand for our
components in flat panel display televisions, digital cameras
and home appliances, as well as expansion into the non-connector
audio accessories market, partially offset by reduced demand in
gaming equipment. Consumer market net revenue increased
significantly in fiscal 2010 compared with fiscal 2009 due to
government incentives in certain countries, customers
replenishing inventory levels and increased demand for our
components in flat panel display televisions, digital cameras
and home appliances.
Industrial market net revenue for fiscal 2011 increased compared
with fiscal 2010 due to higher demand for our connectors in
semiconductor and other production equipment as our
customers increased production to meet demand. Industrial
market net revenue for fiscal 2010 increased compared with
fiscal 2009 as global economic conditions improved over the
prior year. Demand for industrial instruments and production
equipment improved as our customers increased production to meet
demand after delaying many industrial automation projects due to
uncertainties about the economic conditions.
Automotive market net revenue for fiscal 2011 increased compared
with fiscal 2010 due to increased automobile production levels
in the United States and China and our customers
increasing electronic content in automobiles, such as
navigational and entertainment systems, mobile communication and
products to promote fuel efficiency. Automotive market net
revenue for fiscal 2010 increased substantially compared with
fiscal 2009 as global car sales have increased, particularly in
North America, China and Europe, as improving global economic
conditions led to our customers increasing vehicle builds to
replenish inventory levels and meet demand.
Gross
Profit
We measure gross profit as net revenue less cost of sales. Cost
of sales includes manufacturing costs, such as materials, direct
and indirect labor, and factory overhead. Our gross margins are
primarily affected by the following factors: product mix;
volume; cost reduction efforts; competitive pricing pressure;
commodity costs and currency fluctuations.
33
The following table sets forth gross profit and gross margin for
fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
1,088,137
|
|
|
$
|
892,623
|
|
|
$
|
656,177
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
30.3
|
%
|
|
|
29.7
|
%
|
|
|
25.4
|
%
|
The increase in gross margin during fiscal 2011 was primarily
due to increased net revenue. Gross margins have improved over
time due to lower costs resulting from our restructuring
program. The improvements in gross profit and gross margin were
partially offset by the impact of price erosion and material
price increases. The increase in gross margin during fiscal 2010
was primarily due to higher absorption from increased production
and lower costs resulting from our restructuring program. The
improvements in gross profit were partially offset by the impact
of price erosion, material price increases and increased
delivery costs to meet the significant increase in demand.
A significant portion of our material cost consists of copper
and gold costs. We purchased approximately 22 million
pounds of copper and 125,000 troy ounces of gold in fiscal 2011
compared with approximately 23 million pounds of copper and
112,000 troy ounces of gold in fiscal 2010 and approximately
16 million pounds of copper and 87,000 troy ounces of gold
in fiscal 2009.
The following table sets forth the average prices of copper and
gold we purchased in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Copper (price per pound)
|
|
$
|
3.88
|
|
|
$
|
3.04
|
|
|
$
|
2.69
|
|
Gold (price per troy ounce)
|
|
|
1,363.00
|
|
|
|
1,096.00
|
|
|
|
872.00
|
|
Generally, we are able to pass through to our customers only a
small a portion of the changes in the cost of copper and gold.
However, we mitigated the impact of the change in copper and
gold prices by hedging with call options a portion of our
projected net global purchases of copper and gold. The hedges
reduced cost of sales by $7.2 million and $5.1 million
in fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. The hedges did not
materially affect the operating results for fiscal 2009.
In addition to commodity costs, the following table sets forth,
for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009 the effects of certain
significant impacts on gross profit from the prior year (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Price erosion
|
|
$
|
(108,467
|
)
|
|
$
|
(124,787
|
)
|
|
$
|
(97,643
|
)
|
Currency translation
|
|
|
37,958
|
|
|
|
23,928
|
|
|
|
4,590
|
|
Currency transaction
|
|
|
(57,763
|
)
|
|
|
(22,076
|
)
|
|
|
(14,382
|
)
|
Price erosion measures the reduction in prices of our products
year over year, which reduces our gross profit. Price erosion as
a percent of net revenue was 2.9%, 4.0% and 3.6% in fiscal 2011,
2010 and 2009, respectively.
The increase in gross profit due to currency translation gains
in fiscal 2011 was primarily due to a stronger Japanese yen
against other currencies and a general weakening of the
U.S. dollar against other currencies except the euro. The
increase in gross profit due to currency translation gains in
fiscal 2010 was primarily due to stronger Asian currencies. The
increase in gross profit due to currency translation gains in
fiscal 2009 was primarily due to a stronger Japanese yen against
other currencies, partially offset by a general strengthening of
the U.S. dollar against other currencies.
Certain products that we manufacture in Japan and Europe are
sold in other regions of the world at selling prices primarily
denominated in or closely linked to the U.S. dollar. As a
result, changes in currency exchange rates may affect our cost
of sales reported in U.S. dollars without a corresponding
effect on net revenue. The decrease in gross profit due to
currency transactions in fiscal 2011 was primarily due to a
stronger Japanese yen and a weaker U.S. dollar against most
currencies. The decrease in gross profit due to currency
transactions in fiscal 2010 was primarily due to a general
34
weakening of the U.S. dollar against other currencies
except the euro. The decrease in gross profit due to currency
transaction losses in fiscal 2009 was primarily due to a
stronger Japanese yen.
Operating
Expenses
The following table sets forth our operating expenses for fiscal
2011, 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Selling, general & administrative
|
|
$
|
643,462
|
|
|
$
|
610,784
|
|
|
$
|
586,702
|
|
Selling, general & administrative as a percentage of
net revenue
|
|
|
17.9
|
%
|
|
|
20.3
|
%
|
|
|
22.7
|
%
|
Restructuring costs and asset impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,139
|
|
|
|
151,531
|
|
Unauthorized activities in Japan
|
|
|
14,476
|
|
|
|
26,898
|
|
|
|
2,685
|
|
Goodwill impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264,140
|
|
Selling,
general & administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expense increased
$32.7 million in fiscal 2011 compared with fiscal 2010
primarily due to foreign currency translation, investments in
our global sales and marketing organization and research and
development to drive future growth. The impact of currency
translation increased selling, general and administrative
expenses by approximately $12.7 million for fiscal 2011
compared with fiscal 2010 and increased selling, general and
administrative expenses by approximately $13.7 million for
fiscal 2010 compared with fiscal 2009. Selling, general and
administrative expense decreased as a percentage of net revenue
in fiscal 2011 compared with fiscal 2010 primarily due to
efforts to control spending as net revenue increased. Selling,
general and administrative expense increased $24.1 million
in fiscal 2010 compared with fiscal 2009 primarily due to
increased headcount and certain employee benefits that were
suspended during fiscal 2009, but were reinstated in fiscal
2010. Selling, general and administrative expense decreased as a
percentage of net revenue in fiscal 2010 compared with fiscal
2009 primarily due to our lower cost structure resulting from
our restructuring efforts and specific cost containment
activities.
Research and development expenditures, which are classified as
selling, general and administrative expense, were
$170.1 million, or 4.7% of net revenue, for fiscal 2011
compared with $154.0 million, or 5.1% of net revenue, for
fiscal 2010 and $159.2 million, or 6.2% of net revenue, for
fiscal 2009. Research and development expense increased in
fiscal 2011 compared with fiscal 2010 as we made strategic
investments in developing future technology innovations
following cost containment efforts in the prior year. The
decrease in research and development expense in fiscal 2010
compared with fiscal 2009 is primarily due to efforts to contain
cost.
Restructuring
costs and asset impairments
Restructuring costs and asset impairments consist of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Severance costs
|
|
$
|
79,609
|
|
|
$
|
110,155
|
|
Asset impairments
|
|
|
37,296
|
|
|
|
21,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
116,905
|
|
|
|
131,283
|
|
Intangible asset impairments
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
16,300
|
|
Other charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring charges and asset impairments
|
|
$
|
117,139
|
|
|
$
|
151,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal 2007, we undertook a multi-year restructuring plan
designed to reduce costs and to improve return on invested
capital in connection with a new global organization that was
effective
35
July 1, 2007. A majority of the plan related to facilities
located in North America, Europe and Japan and, in general, the
movement of manufacturing activities at these plants to other
lower-cost facilities. We completed our restructuring program on
June 30, 2010 with cumulative expense of
$314.8 million since we announced the restructuring plan.
Annual cost savings related to the restructuring program are
estimated to be $205.0 million.
In fiscal 2010, we recognized net restructuring costs related to
employee severance and benefit arrangements for approximately
1,000 employees, resulting in a charge of
$79.6 million. A large part of these employee terminations
resulted from plant closings in Europe. We recognized asset
impairment charges of $37.3 million to write-down assets to
fair value less the cost to sell.
In fiscal 2009, we recognized net restructuring costs related to
employee severance and benefit arrangements for approximately
6,600 employees, resulting in a charge of
$110.2 million. A large part of these employee terminations
resulted from plant closings in Europe and Asia. We recognized
asset impairment charges of $41.4 million to write-down
assets to fair value less the cost to sell. Restructuring costs
and asset impairments in fiscal 2009 included intangible asset
impairments of $16.3 million due to lower projected future
net revenue and profit in our Industrial business unit of our
Custom & Electrical segment.
The timing of the cash expenditures associated with these
charges does not necessarily correspond to the period in which
the accounting charge is taken. For additional information
concerning the status of our restructuring programs see
Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Goodwill
Fiscal 2009 income from operations included goodwill impairment
charges of $264.1 million. We recorded $93.1 million
and $171.0 million goodwill impairment charges in the
Transportation business unit of our Connector segment and
Industrial business unit of our Custom & Electrical
segment, respectively. The economic downturn in fiscal 2009 had
a negative impact on the business units operating results.
The potential liquidity risk extended our estimate for the
automotive industrys economic recovery and our Industrial
business units results were not recovering in line with
other business units. These factors resulted in lower growth and
profit expectations for these business units, which resulted in
the goodwill impairment charges.
Other (Expense)
Income, net
Other (expense) income consists primarily of investment income,
net interest expense or income, and currency exchange gains or
losses. Interest expense and foreign currency losses principally
offset investment income in fiscal 2011 and 2010. Currency
exchange losses for fiscal 2011 and 2010 were $11.0 million
and $1.8 million, respectively, due to a general weakening
of the U.S. dollar against other currencies, partially
offset by a stronger Japanese yen against most other currencies.
Currency exchange gains in fiscal 2009 were $11.8 million
due to a stronger U.S. dollar and Japanese yen against most
other currencies.
Effective Tax
Rate
The effective tax rate for the fiscal years ended June 30,
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
30.5
|
%
|
|
|
41.5
|
%
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
The effective tax rate for fiscal 2011 was 30.5%. The effective
tax rate for fiscal 2010 was higher than fiscal 2011 due to
(1) income tax expense booked during the year of
$7.7 million, due primarily to the reversal of an estimated
tax benefit resulting from a significant number of employee
stock options that expired unexercised, (2) a charge due to
legislation passed during fiscal 2010 which includes a provision
that reduces the deductibility, for Federal income tax purposes,
of retiree prescription drug
36
benefits to the extent they are reimbursed under Medicare
Part D, (3) tax losses generated in
non-U.S. jurisdictions
for which no tax benefit has been recognized, and
(4) additional U.S. tax cost to repatriate earnings
from non-US subsidiaries during the year. The effective tax rate
in fiscal 2009 was (0.1%) due primarily to charges for goodwill
impairments for which no tax benefit was available and increases
in tax reserves based on evaluation of certain tax positions
taken.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on
differences between the financial statement and tax bases of
assets and liabilities using presently enacted tax rates. We
have net deferred tax assets of $167.3 million at
June 30, 2011.
Results by
Product Segment
Connector.
The following table sets forth the
change in net revenue for the Connector segment for fiscal 2011
and 2010 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net revenue for prior year
|
|
$
|
2,177,014
|
|
|
$
|
1,789,139
|
|
Components of net revenue increase:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic net revenue increase
|
|
|
350,905
|
|
|
|
308,947
|
|
Currency translation
|
|
|
72,550
|
|
|
|
54,224
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total change in net revenue from prior year
|
|
|
423,455
|
|
|
|
387,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue for current year
|
|
$
|
2,600,469
|
|
|
$
|
2,177,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic net revenue increase as a percentage of net revenue for
prior year
|
|
|
16.1
|
%
|
|
|
17.3
|
%
|
The Connector segment sells primarily to the telecommunications,
infotech, automotive and consumer markets, which are discussed
above. Segment net revenue increased in fiscal 2011 and 2010
compared with the prior year periods due to increased demand in
all of the Connector segments primary markets, partially
offset by price erosion. Price erosion, which is generally
higher in the Connector segment compared with our other
segments, was 3.3% and 4.5% in fiscal 2011 and 2010,
respectively.
The following table sets forth information on income from
operations and operating margins for the Connector segment for
fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
$
|
396,233
|
|
|
$
|
123,980
|
|
|
$
|
(125,604
|
)
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
(7.0
|
)%
|
Connector segment income from operations increased in fiscal
2011 compared with fiscal 2010 primarily due to increased net
revenue and completion of our restructuring program on
June 30, 2010. Gross margins were positively impacted from
lower costs from our restructuring program, which has improved
margins over time. Connector segment income from operations also
improved in fiscal 2011 due to controlled selling, general and
administrative costs in a period of increased net revenue.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were
$368.4 million, or 14.2% of net revenue, for fiscal 2011
compared with $347.6 million or 16.0% of net revenue, for
fiscal 2010, due to efficiencies gained from restructuring and
specific cost-containment actions.
Connector segment income from operations increased in fiscal
2010 compared with fiscal 2009 primarily due to increased net
revenue and the $93.1 million goodwill impairment charge
during fiscal 2009 to write-off goodwill based on lower
projected future net revenue and profit growth in our
Transportation business unit. Gross margins in fiscal 2010 were
positively affected by higher absorption and restructuring.
Connector segment income from operations also improved due to
lower selling, general and administrative costs in fiscal 2010.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were
37
$347.6 million, or 16.0% of net revenue, for fiscal 2010
compared with $365.5 million, or 20.5% of net revenue, for
fiscal 2009, due to savings from restructuring and specific
cost-containment actions. Income from operations was unfavorably
impacted by restructuring costs of $100.3 million and
$93.9 million for fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Custom & Electrical.
The following
table sets forth net revenue for fiscal 2011 and 2010 (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net revenue for prior year
|
|
$
|
828,905
|
|
|
$
|
790,601
|
|
Components of net revenue increase:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic net revenue increase
|
|
|
136,757
|
|
|
|
26,673
|
|
Currency translation
|
|
|
10,196
|
|
|
|
6,048
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
9,262
|
|
|
|
5,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total change in net revenue from prior year
|
|
|
156,215
|
|
|
|
38,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue for current year
|
|
$
|
985,120
|
|
|
$
|
828,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic net revenue increase growth as a percentage of net
revenue for prior year
|
|
|
16.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
The sale of Custom & Electrical segments
products is concentrated in the industrial, telecommunications
and infotech markets. Custom & Electrical segment
organic net revenue increased in fiscal 2011 and 2010 due to
increased demand in all of the segments primary markets.
We also completed an asset acquisition of an active optical
cable business during the third quarter of fiscal 2011 and
completed an asset purchase of a company in China during the
second quarter of fiscal 2010.
The following table sets forth income from operations and
operating margins for the Custom & Electrical segment
for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
$
|
154,370
|
|
|
$
|
111,083
|
|
|
$
|
(152,443
|
)
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
|
|
(19.3
|
)%
|
Custom & Electrical segment income from operations
increased in fiscal 2011 compared with fiscal 2010 primarily due
to increased net revenue and completion of our restructuring
program on June 30, 2010. Gross margins were positively
impacted from lower costs from our restructuring program, which
has improved margins over time. Income from operations also
improved in fiscal 2011 due to controlled selling, general and
administrative costs in a period of increased net revenue.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were
$169.6 million, or 17.2% of net revenue, for fiscal 2011
compared with $168.5 million, or 20.2% of net revenue, for
fiscal 2010, due to efficiencies gained from restructuring and
specific cost-containment actions.
Custom & Electrical segment income from operations
increased in fiscal 2010 compared with fiscal 2009 primarily due
to increased net revenue, lower selling, general and
administrative costs and the $171.0 million goodwill
impairment charge and $16.3 million intangible asset charge
during fiscal 2009 to write-off goodwill and intangible assets
in our Industrial business unit due to lower projected future
net revenue and profit growth. Gross margins in fiscal 2010 were
positively affected by higher absorption and restructuring.
Custom & Electrical segment income from operations
also improved due to lower selling, general and administrative
costs in fiscal 2010. Selling, general and administrative
expenses were $168.5 million, or 20.2% of net revenue, for
fiscal 2010 compared with $186.0 million, or 23.5% of net
revenue, for fiscal 2009, due to savings from restructuring and
specific cost-containment actions. Income from operations was
unfavorably impacted by restructuring costs of
$12.2 million and $39.3 million for fiscal 2010 and
2009, respectively.
38
Financial
Condition and Liquidity
We fund capital projects and working capital needs principally
out of operating cash flows and cash on hand. Cash, cash
equivalents and marketable securities totaled
$546.5 million and $394.9 million at June 30,
2011 and 2010, respectively, of which approximately
$514.3 million was in
non-U.S. accounts,
including $183.2 million in China, as of June 30,
2011. Transferring cash, cash equivalents or marketable
securities to U.S. accounts from
non-U.S. accounts
could subject us to additional U.S. repatriation income
tax. Principal uses of cash are capital expenditures, dividend
payments and business investments. Our long-term financing
strategy is to primarily rely on internal sources of funds for
investing in plant, equipment and acquisitions.
In June 2009, we entered into a $195.0 million unsecured,
three-year revolving credit facility in the United States,
amended in January 2010 and September 2010, that was initially
scheduled to mature in June 2012 (the U.S. Credit
Facility). In connection with the September 2010
amendment, we increased the credit line on the U.S. Credit
Facility to $270.0 million. In March 2011, we amended the
credit facility to increase the credit line to
$350.0 million and extend the term to March 2016.
Total debt, including obligations under capital leases totaled
$342.6 million and $293.5 million at June 30,
2011 and 2010, respectively. We had available lines of credit
totaling $244.3 million at June 30, 2011, including
$165.0 million available under the U.S. Credit
Facility as of June 30, 2011. The U.S. Credit Facility
also requires us to maintain financial covenants pertaining to,
among other things, our consolidated leverage and fixed charge
coverage. As of June 30, 2011, we were in compliance with
these covenants. Additionally, we have three unsecured borrowing
agreements in Japan totaling ¥12.2 billion
($151.4 million) as of June 30, 2011, with weighted
average fixed interest rates of 1.25%. See Note 13 of the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Cash
Flows
Below is a table setting forth the key lines of our Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Cash provided from operating activities
|
|
$
|
466,151
|
|
|
$
|
250,579
|
|
|
$
|
369,898
|
|
Cash used for investing activities
|
|
|
(270,709
|
)
|
|
|
(216,871
|
)
|
|
|
(253,086
|
)
|
Cash used for financing activities
|
|
|
(77,191
|
)
|
|
|
(83,236
|
)
|
|
|
(155,582
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
37,996
|
|
|
|
1,173
|
|
|
|
(12,030
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
156,247
|
|
|
$
|
(48,355
|
)
|
|
$
|
(50,800
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Activities
Cash provided from operating activities in fiscal 2011 increased
by $215.6 million from the prior year due primarily to an
increase in net income in fiscal 2011 compared with fiscal 2010.
Working capital needs increased $116.0 million in fiscal
2011 as inventory production increased due to customer demand
and supply chain inventory increased due to the conversion from
air shipment to sea shipment. Working capital is defined as
current assets minus current liabilities. Our restructuring
accrual as of June 30, 2011 was $14.0 million compared
to $26.9 million as of June 30, 2010, which was
reduced through cash outlays during fiscal 2011.
Cash provided from operating activities in fiscal 2010 decreased
$119.3 million from fiscal 2009 due mainly to an increase
in working capital needs in fiscal 2010 compared with fiscal
2009.
Investing
Activities
Cash used for investing activities increased by
$53.8 million due to increased investments in capital
expenditures and acquisitions and lower net sales of marketable
securities in fiscal 2011 compared with fiscal 2010.
39
During fiscal 2011, we completed an asset acquisition of an
active optical cable business for $24.6 million and
recorded goodwill of $14.6 million. The purchase price
includes contingent consideration up to $5.8 million.
During fiscal 2010, we completed an asset purchase of a company
in China for $10.1 million. During fiscal 2009, we
completed the acquisition of two companies and a joint venture
in cash transactions approximating $74.8 million. We
recorded additional goodwill of $27.9 million in connection
with the acquisitions.
Capital expenditures increased $32.8 million during fiscal
2011 as demand and production increased. Capital expenditures
increased $51.5 million during fiscal 2010 compared with
fiscal 2009 as demand and production increased.
We had $3.6 million in net sales of marketable securities
during fiscal 2011 compared with $25.5 million in net sales
of marketable securities during fiscal 2010. We had
$13.2 million net purchases of marketable securities in
fiscal 2009. Our marketable securities generally have a term of
less than one year. Our investments in marketable securities are
primarily based on our uses of cash in operating, other
investing and financing activities.
Financing
Activities
Cash used for financing activities decreased $6.0 million
during fiscal 2011 compared with fiscal 2010 primarily due to
the increase in net proceeds from the revolving credit facility,
partially offset by an increase in quarterly cash dividends paid.
Net borrowings against our $350.0 million unsecured,
five-year revolving credit facility during the twelve months
ended June 30, 2011 were $85.0 million compared to
$75.0 million in the prior year period. Total borrowings
against the credit facility were $185.0 million as of
June 30, 2011.
We increased our quarterly cash dividend in fiscal 2011 to
$0.1750 per share, an increase of 14.8% from the previous
quarterly cash dividend of $0.1525 per share in fiscal 2010. The
increase was effective to shareholders of record on
December 31, 2010. We increased our cash dividend again
during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 to $0.2000 per share,
which was effective to shareholders of record on June 30,
2011.
On August 1, 2008, our Board of Directors authorized the
repurchase of up to an aggregate $200.0 million of common
stock through June 30, 2009. We purchased shares of Common
Stock and Class A Common Stock totaling 4.5 million
shares during fiscal 2009. The aggregate cost of the purchase
was $76.3 million for fiscal 2009.
As part of our growth strategy, in the future we may acquire
other companies in the same or complementary lines of business
and pursue other business ventures. The timing and size of any
new business ventures or acquisitions we complete may impact our
cash requirements. To the extent we are required to pay all or
any portion of the unauthorized loans in Molex Japan our cash
requirements may also be impacted.
Sources of
Liquidity
We believe we have sufficient cash balances, cash flow and
available credit lines to support our planned growth. As part of
our growth strategy, we may, in the future, acquire other
companies in the same or complementary lines of business, and
pursue other business ventures. The timing and size of any new
business ventures or acquisitions we complete may affect our
cash requirements and debt balances.
40
Total debt consisted of the following at June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Credit Facility
|
|
|
2.05
|
%
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
$
|
185,000
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
Unsecured bonds and term loans
|
|
|
0.77 - 1.31
|
%
|
|
|
2012 - 2013
|
|
|
|
89,342
|
|
|
|
129,225
|
|
Mortgages, industrial development bonds and other debt
|
|
|
5.92
|
%
|
|
|
2012 - 2013
|
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
5,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275,870
|
|
|
|
234,357
|
|
Less current portion of long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured bonds and term loans
|
|
|
0.77 - 1.31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,156
|
|
|
|
47,794
|
|
Mortgages, industrial development bonds and other debt
|
|
|
5.92
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
|
3,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222,794
|
|
|
|
183,434
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overdraft loan
|
|
|
2.48
|
%
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
62,060
|
|
|
|
56,565
|
|
Other short-term borrowings
|
|
|
5.92
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,628
|
|
|
|
2,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,688
|
|
|
|
59,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
342,558
|
|
|
$
|
293,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In June 2009, we entered into a $195.0 million unsecured,
three-year revolving credit facility in the United States,
amended in January 2010, September 2010 and March 2011 that was
initially scheduled to mature in June 2012 (the U.S. Credit
Facility). In connection with the September 2010 amendment, we
increased the credit line on the U.S. Credit Facility to
$270.0 million. In March 2011, we further amended the
credit facility to increase the credit line to
$350.0 million and extend the term to March 2016.
Borrowings under the U.S. Credit Facility bear interest at
a fluctuating interest rate (based on London InterBank Offered
Rate) plus an applicable percentage based on our consolidated
leverage. The applicable percentage was 150 basis points as
of June 30, 2011. The instrument governing the
U.S. Credit Facility contains customary covenants regarding
liens, debt, substantial asset sales and mergers, dividends and
investments. The U.S. Credit Facility also requires us to
maintain financial covenants pertaining to, among other things,
our consolidated leverage and fixed charge coverage. As of
June 30, 2011, we were in compliance with these covenants
and had outstanding borrowings of $185.0 million.
In March 2011, Molex Japan renewed a ¥5.0 billion
overdraft loan, with a six month term and an interest rate of
approximately 2.48%. At June 30, 2011, the balance of the
overdraft loan, which requires full repayment by the end of the
term if not renewed, approximated $62.1 million.
In March 2010, Molex Japan entered into a ¥3.0 billion
syndicated term loan for three years, with interest rates
equivalent to six month Tokyo Interbank Offered Rate (TIBOR)
plus 75 basis points and scheduled principal payments of
¥0.5 billion every six months (Syndicated Term Loan).
At June 30, 2011, the balance of the syndicated term loan
approximated $24.8 million, of which $12.4 million was
current.
In September 2009, Molex Japan issued unsecured bonds totaling
¥10.0 billion with a term of three years, an interest
rate of approximately 1.65% and scheduled principal payments of
¥1.6 billion every six months. At June 30, 2011,
the outstanding balance of the unsecured bonds approximated
$64.5 million, of which $39.7 million was current.
41
Certain assets, including land, buildings and equipment, secure
a portion of our long-term debt. Principal payments on long-term
debt obligations are due as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
53,076
|
|
2013
|
|
|
37,762
|
|
2014
|
|
|
32
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
185,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt obligations
|
|
$
|
275,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We had available lines of credit totaling $244.3 million at
June 30, 2011 expiring between 2011 and 2016.
Contractual
Obligations and Commercial Commitments
The following table summarizes our significant contractual
obligations at June 30, 2011, and the effect such
obligations are expected to have on liquidity and cash flows in
future periods (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
$
|
38,845
|
|
|
$
|
16,107
|
|
|
$
|
12,809
|
|
|
$
|
8,413
|
|
|
$
|
1,516
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
4,668
|
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
3,391
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
10,433
|
|
|
|
1,066
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
8,946
|
|
Debt obligations
|
|
|
342,558
|
|
|
|
119,764
|
|
|
|
222,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(1)
|
|
$
|
396,504
|
|
|
$
|
138,030
|
|
|
$
|
239,406
|
|
|
$
|
8,606
|
|
|
$
|
10,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Total does not include contractual obligations recorded on the
balance sheet as current liabilities for certain purchase
obligations, as discussed below. Debt and capital lease
obligations include interest payments.
|
Contractual obligations for purchases of goods or services are
defined as agreements that are enforceable and legally binding
on us and that specify all significant terms, including fixed or
minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable
price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction.
Our purchase orders are based on current manufacturing needs and
are fulfilled by vendors within short time horizons. In
addition, some purchase orders represent authorizations to
purchase rather than binding agreements. We do not generally
have significant agreements for the purchase of raw materials or
other goods specifying minimum quantities and set prices that
exceed expected requirements for three months. Agreements for
outsourced services generally contain clauses allowing for
cancellation without significant penalty, and are therefore not
included in the table above.
The expected timing of payments of the obligations above is
estimated based on current information. Timing of payments and
actual amounts paid may be different, depending on the time of
receipt of goods or services, or changes to
agreed-upon
amounts for some obligations.
Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
We do not have material exposure to any off-balance sheet
arrangements. We do not have any unconsolidated special purpose
entities.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
Our accounting and financial reporting policies are in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP). The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with GAAP
42
requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements, and the reported amounts of net
revenue and expenses during the reporting period.
Significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 2 of
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Noted here are a
number of policies that require significant judgments or
estimates.
Revenue
Recognition
Our revenue recognition policies are in accordance with
Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)
605-10,
Revenue Recognition, as issued by the SEC and other applicable
guidance.
We recognize net revenue upon shipment of product and transfer
of ownership to the customer. Contracts and customer purchase
orders generally are used to determine the existence of an
arrangement. Shipping documents, proof of delivery and customer
acceptance (when applicable) are used to verify delivery. We
assess whether an amount due from a customer is fixed and
determinable based on the terms of the agreement with the
customer, including, but not limited to, the payment terms
associated with the transaction. The impact of judgments and
estimates on net revenue recognition is minimal. A reserve for
estimated returns is established at the time of sale based on
historical return experience to cover returns of defective
product and is recorded as a reduction of net revenue.
Income
Taxes
As a result of the implementation of
ASC 740-10,
Accounting for Income Taxes, effective July 1, 2009, we
recognize liabilities for uncertain tax positions based on the
two-step process prescribed within the interpretation. The first
step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by
determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that
it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained
on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation
processes, if any. The second step requires us to estimate and
measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than
50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement. It is
inherently difficult and subjective to estimate such amounts, as
this requires us to determine the probability of various
possible outcomes. We re-evaluate these uncertain tax positions
on a quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on factors
including, but not limited to, changes in facts or
circumstances, changes in tax law, effectively settled issues
under audit and new audit activity. Such a change in recognition
or measurement would result in the recognition of a tax benefit
or an additional charge to the tax provision in the period.
Prior to adoption of
ASC 740-10,
our policy was to establish accruals for taxes that may become
payable in future years as a result of examinations by tax
authorities. We established the accruals based upon
managements assessment of probable income tax
contingencies.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on
differences between the financial statement and tax bases of
assets and liabilities using presently enacted tax rates. We
have net deferred tax assets of $167.3 million at
June 30, 2011.
We periodically assess the carrying value of our deferred tax
assets based upon our ability to generate sufficient future
taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions. If we determine
that we will not be able to realize all or part of our deferred
tax assets in the future, a valuation allowance is established
in the period such determination is made. We have determined
that it is unlikely that we will realize a net deferred asset in
the future relating to certain
non-U.S. net
operating losses. The cumulative valuation allowance relating to
net operating losses is approximately $67.3 million at
June 30, 2011.
We have operations in countries around the world that are
subject to income and other similar taxes in these countries.
The estimation of the income tax amounts that we record involves
the interpretation of complex tax laws and regulations,
evaluation of tax audit findings and assessment of
43
how foreign taxes may affect domestic taxes. Although we believe
our tax accruals are adequate, differences may occur in the
future depending on the resolution of pending and new tax
matters.
Subsidiaries with historical net operating losses were able to
utilize $83.7 million of these losses during fiscal 2011.
Provision is made for taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign
subsidiaries and related companies to the extent that such
earnings are not deemed to be permanently invested.
Inventory
Inventories are valued at the lower of
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) cost or market value. FIFO inventories recorded
in our consolidated balance sheet are adjusted for an allowance
covering inventories determined to be slow-moving or excess. The
allowance for slow-moving and excess inventories is maintained
at an amount management considers appropriate based on factors
such as historical usage of the product, open sales orders and
future sales forecasts. If our sales forecast for specific
products is greater than actual demand and we fail to reduce
manufacturing output accordingly, we could be required to write
down additional inventory, which would have a negative impact on
gross margin and operating results. Such factors require
judgment, and changes in any of these factors could result in
changes to this allowance.
Pension
Plans
The costs and obligations of our defined benefit pension plans
are dependent on actuarial assumptions. Three critical
assumptions used, which impact the net periodic pension expense
(income) and two of which impact the pension benefit obligation
(PBO), are the discount rate, expected return on plan assets and
rate of compensation increase. The discount rate is determined
based on high-quality fixed income investments that match the
duration of expected benefit payments. The discount rate used to
determine the present value of our future U.S. pension
obligations is based on a yield curve constructed from a
portfolio of high quality corporate debt securities with various
maturities. Each years expected future benefit payments
are discounted to their present value at the appropriate yield
curve rate, thereby generating the overall discount rate for
U.S. pension obligations. The discount rates for our
foreign pension plans are selected by using a yield curve
approach or by reference to high quality corporate bond rates in
those countries that have developed corporate bond markets. In
those countries where developed corporate bond markets do not
exist, the discount rates are selected by reference to local
government bond rates with a premium added to reflect the
additional risk for corporate bonds. The expected return on plan
assets represents a forward projection of the average rate of
earnings expected on the pension assets. We have estimated this
rate based on historical returns of similarly diversified
portfolios. The rate of compensation increase represents the
long-term assumption for expected increases to salaries for
pay-related plans. These key assumptions are evaluated annually.
Changes in these assumptions can result in different expense and
liability amounts. For additional information concerning the
assumptions see Note 12 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
44
The effects of the indicated increase and decrease in selected
assumptions for our pension plans as of June 30, 2011,
assuming no changes in benefit levels and no amortization of
gains or losses, is shown below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
in PBO
|
|
in Pension Expense
|
|
|
U.S. Plan
|
|
Intl Plans
|
|
U.S. Plan
|
|
Intl Plans
|
|
Discount rate change:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase 50 basis points
|
|
$
|
(5,563
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,840
|
)
|
|
$
|
(95
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90
|
)
|
Decrease 50 basis points
|
|
|
6,259
|
|
|
|
11,068
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Expected rate of return change:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase 100 basis points
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
613
|
|
|
|
613
|
|
Decrease 100 basis points
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(613
|
)
|
|
|
(613
|
)
|
Other
Postretirement Benefits
We have retiree health care plans that cover the majority of our
U.S. employees. There are no significant postretirement
health care benefit plans outside of the U.S. The health
care cost trend rate assumption has a significant effect on the
amount of the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation
(APBO) and retiree health care benefit expense. The effects of
the indicated increase and decrease in the assumed healthcare
cost trend rates for our retiree healthcare plans as of
June 30, 2011, assuming no change in benefit levels is
shown below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
Total Annual Service
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
and Interest Cost
|
|
in APBO
|
|
Increase 100 basis points:
|
|
$
|
676
|
|
|
$
|
6,827
|
|
Decrease 100 basis points:
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
|
|
(5,621
|
)
|
Stock
Options
We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the
fair value of each option grant as of the date of grant.
Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of our
common stock. We estimate the expected life of the option using
historical data pertaining to option exercises and employee
terminations. Separate groups of employees that have similar
historical exercise behavior are considered separately for
estimating the expected life. The risk-free interest rate is
based on U.S. Treasury yields in effect at the time of
grant.
Fair Value of
Financial Assets and Liabilities
The following table summarizes our financial assets and
liabilities which are measured at fair value on a recurring
basis and subject to the disclosure requirements of
ASC 820-10,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, as of June 30,
2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Markets for
|
|
Other
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Measured
|
|
Identical
|
|
Observable
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
at Fair
|
|
Assets
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Value
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Available for sale and trading securities
|
|
$
|
26,073
|
|
|
$
|
26,073
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments, net
|
|
|
10,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
We determine the fair value of our available for sale securities
based on quoted market prices (Level 1). We generally use
derivatives for hedging purposes pursuant to
ASC 815-10,
which are valued based on Level 2 inputs in the
ASC 820-10
fair value hierarchy. The fair value of our financial
instruments is determined by a mark to market valuation based on
forward curves using observable market prices. The carrying
value of our long-term debt approximates fair value.
45
Goodwill
Goodwill is recorded when the purchase price paid for an
acquisition exceeds the estimated fair value of the net
identified tangible and intangible assets acquired.
We perform an annual goodwill impairment analysis as of
May 31, or earlier if indicators of potential impairment
exist. In assessing the recoverability of goodwill, we review
both quantitative as well as qualitative factors to support our
assumptions with regard to fair value. Our impairment review
process compares the estimated fair value of the reporting unit
in which goodwill resides to our carrying value. Reporting units
may be operating segments as a whole or an operation one level
below an operating segment, referred to as a component.
Components are defined as operations for which discrete
financial information is available and reviewed by segment
management.
The fair value of a reporting unit is estimated using a
discounted cash flow model for the evaluation of impairment. The
expected future cash flows are generally based on
managements estimates and are determined by looking at
numerous factors including projected economic conditions and
customer demand, net revenue and margins, changes in
competition, operating costs and new products introduced. In
determining fair value, we make certain judgments. If these
estimates or their related assumptions change in the future as a
result of changes in strategy or market conditions, we may be
required to record an impairment charge.
Although management believes its assumptions in determining the
projected cash flows are reasonable, changes in those estimates
could affect the evaluation.
Restructuring
Costs and Asset Impairments
We have recorded charges in connection with restructuring our
business. We recognize a liability for restructuring costs at
fair value when the liability is incurred. The main components
of our restructuring plans are related to workforce reductions
and the closure and consolidation of excess facilities.
Workforce-related charges are expensed and accrued when it is
determined that a liability is probable, which is generally
after individuals have been notified of their termination dates
and expected severance payments, but under certain circumstances
may be recognized upon approval of a restructuring plan by
management or in future accounting periods when terminated
employees continue to provide service. Plans to consolidate
excess facilities result in charges for lease termination fees,
future commitments to pay lease charges, net of estimated future
sublease income, and adjustments to the fair value of buildings
and equipment to be sold. Charges for the consolidation of
excess facilities are based on an estimate of the amounts and
timing of future cash flows related to the expected future
remaining use and ultimate sale or disposal of buildings and
equipment.
The timing of the cash expenditures associated with these
charges does not necessarily correspond to the period in which
the accounting charge is taken. For additional information
concerning the status of our restructuring program, which we
completed on June 30, 2010, see Note 6 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements. See also
Forward-Looking Statements.
Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments (OTTI)
For
available-for-sale
securities, we presume an OTTI decline in value if the quoted
market price of the security is 20% or more below the
investments cost basis for a continuous period of six
months or more. However, the presumption of an OTTI decline in
value may be overcome if there is persuasive evidence indicating
that the decline is temporary in nature. For investments
accounted for under the equity method, we evaluate all known
quantitative and qualitative factors in addition to quoted
market prices in determining whether an OTTI decline in value
exists. Factors that we consider important in evaluating for a
potential OTTI, include historical operating performance, future
financial projections, business plans for new products or
concepts and strength of balance sheet.
46
Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets
In accordance with ASC 360, Accounting for the Impairment
or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we assess the impairment of
long-lived assets, other than goodwill and trade names,
including property and equipment, and identifiable intangible
assets subject to amortization, whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be
recoverable. Factors we consider important, which could trigger
an impairment review, include significant changes in the manner
of our use of the asset, changes in historical trends in
operating performance, changes in projected operating
performance, and significant negative economic trends.
Contingencies
In accordance with ASC 450, Contingencies, we analyze
whether it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a
liability has been incurred, and whether the amount of loss can
be reasonably estimated. If the loss contingency is both
probable and reasonably estimable, we accrue for costs
associated with the loss contingency, including direct costs
incurred. If no accrual is made but the loss contingency is
reasonably possible, we disclose the nature of the contingency
and the related estimate of possible loss or range of loss if
such an estimate can be made. Loss contingencies include, but
are not limited to, possible losses related to legal proceedings
and regulatory compliance matters. Liabilities established to
provide for contingencies are adjusted as further information
develops, circumstances change, or contingencies are resolved.
New Accounting
Pronouncements
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the
FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU)
No. 2011-05,
Comprehensive Income (Topic 220). This new guidance requires the
components of net income and other comprehensive income to be
either presented in one continuous statement, referred to as the
statement of comprehensive income, or in two separate, but
consecutive statements. This new guidance eliminates the current
option to report other comprehensive income and its components
in the statement of stockholders equity. While the new
guidance changes the presentation of comprehensive income, there
are no changes to the components that are recognized in net
income or other comprehensive income under current accounting
guidance. This new guidance is effective for us for the quarter
ended March 31, 2012 and will amend our presentation of the
components of comprehensive income.
In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2011-04,
Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820), to achieve common fair value
measurement and disclosure requirements between U.S. GAAP
and International Financial Reporting Standards. This new
guidance, which is effective for us for the quarter ended
March 31, 2012, amends current U.S. GAAP fair value
measurement and disclosure guidance to include increased
transparency around valuation inputs and investment
categorization. We do not expect the adoption will have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
We are subject to market risk associated with changes in foreign
currency exchange rates, interest rates and certain commodity
prices.
We mitigate our foreign currency exchange rate risk principally
through the establishment of local production facilities in the
markets we serve. This creates a natural hedge since
purchases and sales within a specific country are both
denominated in the same currency limiting the need to hedge with
a foreign exchange forward or option contract (collectively,
foreign exchange contracts). Natural hedges exist in
most countries in which we operate, although the percentage of
natural offsets, as compared with offsets that need to be hedged
by foreign exchange contracts, will vary from country to country.
47
We also monitor our foreign currency exposure in each country
and implement strategies to respond to changing economic and
political environments. Examples of these strategies include the
prompt payment of intercompany balances utilizing a global
netting system, the establishing of contra-currency accounts in
several international subsidiaries, development of natural
hedges and use of foreign exchange contracts to protect or
preserve the value of cash flows. See Note 16 of the Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of the
foreign exchange contracts in use at June 30, 2011 and 2010.
We have implemented a formalized treasury risk management policy
that describes the procedures and controls over derivative
financial and commodity instruments. Under the policy, we do not
use derivative financial or commodity instruments for
speculative or trading purposes, and the use of such instruments
is subject to strict approval levels by senior management.
Typically, the use of derivative instruments is limited to
hedging activities related to specific foreign currency cash
flows and net receivable and payable balances and call options
on certain commodities. See Note 16 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of the
derivative instruments in use at June 30, 2011 and 2010
The translation of the financial statements of the non-North
American operations is impacted by fluctuations in foreign
currency exchange rates. The increase in consolidated net
revenue and income from operations was impacted by the
translation of our international financial statements into
U.S. dollars resulting in increased net revenue of
$82.7 million and increased income from operations of
$17.2 million for fiscal 2011, compared with the estimated
results for fiscal 2010 using the average rates for 2010.
Our $13.9 million of marketable securities at June 30,
2011 are principally invested in time deposits.
Interest rate exposure is generally limited to our marketable
securities, U.S. Credit Facility and Syndicated Term Loan.
We do not actively manage the risk of interest rate
fluctuations. Our marketable securities mature in less than
12 months. We had $185.0 million outstanding on the
U.S. Credit Facility with an interest rate of approximately
2.05% at June 30, 2011. The balance of our Syndicated Term
Loan was approximately $24.8 million with an interest rate
of approximately 1.31% at June 30, 2011.
Due to the nature of our operations, we are not subject to
significant concentration risks relating to customers or
products. Approximately 32% and 16% of net revenue in fiscal
2011 was derived from operations from China and Japan,
respectively.
We monitor the environmental laws and regulations in the
countries in which we operate. We have implemented an
environmental program to reduce the generation of potentially
hazardous materials during our manufacturing process and believe
we continue to meet or exceed local government regulations.
48
|
|
Item 8.
|
Consolidated
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
Molex
Incorporated
Index to
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
532,599
|
|
|
$
|
376,352
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
13,947
|
|
|
|
18,508
|
|
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $42,297 at June 30,
2011 and $43,650 at June 30, 2010
|
|
|
811,449
|
|
|
|
734,932
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
535,953
|
|
|
|
469,369
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
129,158
|
|
|
|
112,531
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
32,239
|
|
|
|
64,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,055,345
|
|
|
|
1,775,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,168,448
|
|
|
|
1,055,144
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
149,452
|
|
|
|
131,910
|
|
Non-current deferred income taxes
|
|
|
38,178
|
|
|
|
94,191
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
186,429
|
|
|
|
179,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,597,852
|
|
|
$
|
3,236,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and short-term borrowings
|
|
$
|
119,764
|
|
|
$
|
110,070
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
359,812
|
|
|
|
395,474
|
|
Accrued expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries, commissions and bonuses
|
|
|
90,913
|
|
|
|
96,403
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
14,049
|
|
|
|
26,898
|
|
Accrual for unauthorized activities in Japan
|
|
|
182,460
|
|
|
|
165,815
|
|
Other
|
|
|
112,666
|
|
|
|
96,531
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
2,383
|
|
|
|
21,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
882,047
|
|
|
|
912,696
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
23,879
|
|
|
|
19,869
|
|
Accrued pension and other postretirement benefits
|
|
|
100,866
|
|
|
|
135,448
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
222,794
|
|
|
|
183,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,229,586
|
|
|
|
1,251,447
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.05 par value; 200,000 shares
authorized; 112,204 shares issued at June 30, 2011 and
2010
|
|
|
5,610
|
|
|
|
5,610
|
|
Class A Common Stock, $0.05 par value;
200,000 shares authorized; 113,400 shares issued at
June 30, 2011 and 111,839 shares issued at
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
5,670
|
|
|
|
5,592
|
|
Class B Common Stock, $0.05 par value; 146 shares
authorized; 94 shares issued at June 30, 2011 and 2010
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Paid-in capital
|
|
|
674,494
|
|
|
|
638,796
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
2,408,083
|
|
|
|
2,232,445
|
|
Treasury stock (Common Stock, 16,644 shares at
June 30, 2011 and 2010; Class A Common Stock,
33,712 shares at June 30, 2011 and 33,298 shares
at June 30, 2010), at cost
|
|
|
(1,106,039
|
)
|
|
|
(1,098,087
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
380,443
|
|
|
|
200,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,368,266
|
|
|
|
1,985,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,597,852
|
|
|
$
|
3,236,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
3,587,334
|
|
|
$
|
3,007,207
|
|
|
$
|
2,581,841
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
2,499,197
|
|
|
|
2,114,584
|
|
|
|
1,925,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,088,137
|
|
|
|
892,623
|
|
|
|
656,177
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
643,462
|
|
|
|
610,784
|
|
|
|
586,702
|
|
Restructuring costs and asset impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,139
|
|
|
|
151,531
|
|
Unauthorized activities in Japan
|
|
|
14,476
|
|
|
|
26,898
|
|
|
|
2,685
|
|
Goodwill impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
657,938
|
|
|
|
754,821
|
|
|
|
1,005,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
430,199
|
|
|
|
137,802
|
|
|
|
(348,881
|
)
|
Interest (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(5,708
|
)
|
|
|
(5,416
|
)
|
|
|
1,961
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
5,448
|
|
|
|
(897
|
)
|
|
|
25,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (expense) income
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
|
|
(6,313
|
)
|
|
|
27,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
429,939
|
|
|
|
131,489
|
|
|
|
(321,573
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
131,131
|
|
|
|
54,559
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
298,808
|
|
|
$
|
76,930
|
|
|
$
|
(322,036
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
(1.84
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.70
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
(1.84
|
)
|
Average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
174,812
|
|
|
|
173,803
|
|
|
|
174,598
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
175,943
|
|
|
|
174,660
|
|
|
|
174,598
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
298,808
|
|
|
$
|
76,930
|
|
|
$
|
(322,036
|
)
|
Add (deduct) non-cash items included in net income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
242,171
|
|
|
|
238,666
|
|
|
|
251,902
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264,140
|
|
Asset write-downs included in restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,296
|
|
|
|
41,376
|
|
Loss (gain) on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
558
|
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
37,514
|
|
|
|
(16,965
|
)
|
|
|
(28,233
|
)
|
Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
4,843
|
|
|
|
4,092
|
|
|
|
2,478
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
22,461
|
|
|
|
27,034
|
|
|
|
26,508
|
|
Other non-cash items
|
|
|
(22,554
|
)
|
|
|
20,577
|
|
|
|
(8,124
|
)
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(16,401
|
)
|
|
|
(208,051
|
)
|
|
|
201,080
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(25,916
|
)
|
|
|
(117,701
|
)
|
|
|
95,529
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(63,984
|
)
|
|
|
115,869
|
|
|
|
(84,502
|
)
|
Other current assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(9,298
|
)
|
|
|
14,559
|
|
|
|
(22,591
|
)
|
Other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(1,493
|
)
|
|
|
57,715
|
|
|
|
(47,486
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided from operating activities
|
|
|
466,151
|
|
|
|
250,579
|
|
|
|
369,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(262,246
|
)
|
|
|
(229,477
|
)
|
|
|
(177,943
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
1,804
|
|
|
|
3,014
|
|
|
|
9,574
|
|
Proceeds from sales or maturities of marketable securities
|
|
|
11,936
|
|
|
|
44,373
|
|
|
|
29,549
|
|
Purchases of marketable securities
|
|
|
(8,328
|
)
|
|
|
(18,890
|
)
|
|
|
(42,751
|
)
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
(18,847
|
)
|
|
|
(10,097
|
)
|
|
|
(74,789
|
)
|
Other investing activities
|
|
|
4,972
|
|
|
|
(5,794
|
)
|
|
|
3,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used for investing activities
|
|
|
(270,709
|
)
|
|
|
(216,871
|
)
|
|
|
(253,086
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from revolving credit facility
|
|
|
105,000
|
|
|
|
154,000
|
|
|
|
245,000
|
|
Payments on revolving credit facility
|
|
|
(20,000
|
)
|
|
|
(79,000
|
)
|
|
|
(295,000
|
)
|
Proceeds from short-term loans
|
|
|
57,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on short-term loans
|
|
|
(60,270
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,647
|
|
|
|
78,060
|
|
Payments on long-term debt
|
|
|
(48,356
|
)
|
|
|
(87,787
|
)
|
|
|
(1,827
|
)
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
(114,410
|
)
|
|
|
(105,984
|
)
|
|
|
(99,640
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
7,269
|
|
|
|
4,008
|
|
|
|
1,692
|
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,693
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76,342
|
)
|
Other financing activities
|
|
|
(4,044
|
)
|
|
|
(1,120
|
)
|
|
|
(9,218
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used for financing activities
|
|
|
(77,191
|
)
|
|
|
(83,236
|
)
|
|
|
(155,582
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
37,996
|
|
|
|
1,173
|
|
|
|
(12,030
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
156,247
|
|
|
|
(48,355
|
)
|
|
|
(50,800
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
376,352
|
|
|
|
424,707
|
|
|
|
475,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
$
|
532,599
|
|
|
$
|
376,352
|
|
|
$
|
424,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
5,830
|
|
|
$
|
6,262
|
|
|
$
|
5,487
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
98,117
|
|
|
$
|
43,319
|
|
|
$
|
83,904
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
$
|
11,285
|
|
|
$
|
11,207
|
|
|
$
|
11,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
638,796
|
|
|
$
|
601,459
|
|
|
$
|
569,046
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
22,461
|
|
|
|
27,034
|
|
|
|
26,508
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
11,372
|
|
|
|
9,012
|
|
|
|
4,183
|
|
Issuance of stock awards
|
|
|
1,865
|
|
|
|
1,291
|
|
|
|
1,586
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
674,494
|
|
|
$
|
638,796
|
|
|
$
|
601,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
2,232,445
|
|
|
$
|
2,261,594
|
|
|
$
|
2,691,451
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
298,808
|
|
|
|
76,930
|
|
|
|
(322,036
|
)
|
Dividends
|
|
|
(122,913
|
)
|
|
|
(106,079
|
)
|
|
|
(106,110
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(257
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,711
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
2,408,083
|
|
|
$
|
2,232,445
|
|
|
$
|
2,261,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
(1,098,087
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,089,322
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,009,021
|
)
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76,342
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
(7,952
|
)
|
|
|
(8,765
|
)
|
|
|
(3,959
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
(1,106,039
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,098,087
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,089,322
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
200,770
|
|
|
$
|
176,383
|
|
|
$
|
313,700
|
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
147,772
|
|
|
|
35,482
|
|
|
|
(115,029
|
)
|
Pension adjustments, net of tax
|
|
|
29,935
|
|
|
|
(12,459
|
)
|
|
|
(22,137
|
)
|
Unrealized investment gain (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
1,966
|
|
|
|
1,364
|
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
380,443
|
|
|
$
|
200,770
|
|
|
$
|
176,383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,368,266
|
|
|
$
|
1,985,131
|
|
|
$
|
1,961,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
298,808
|
|
|
$
|
76,930
|
|
|
$
|
(322,036
|
)
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
147,772
|
|
|
|
35,482
|
|
|
|
(115,029
|
)
|
Pension adjustments, net of tax
|
|
|
29,935
|
|
|
|
(12,459
|
)
|
|
|
(22,137
|
)
|
Unrealized investment gain (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
1,966
|
|
|
|
1,364
|
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
|
$
|
478,481
|
|
|
$
|
101,317
|
|
|
$
|
(459,353
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
53
Molex
Incorporated
|
|
1.
|
Organization and
Basis of Presentation
|
Molex Incorporated (together with its subsidiaries, except where
the context otherwise requires, we, us
and our) manufactures electronic components,
including electrical and fiber optic interconnection products
and systems, switches and integrated products in 39
manufacturing locations in 16 countries.
|
|
2.
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies
|
Principles of
Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Molex Incorporated and our majority-owned subsidiaries. All
material intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated
in consolidation. Equity investments in which we exercise
significant influence but do not control and are not the primary
beneficiary are accounted for using the equity method.
Investments in which we are not able to exercise significant
influence over the investee are accounted for under the cost
method.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States requires the use of estimates and assumptions
related to the reporting of assets, liabilities, net revenue,
expenses and related disclosures. Actual results could differ
from these estimates. Material subsequent events are evaluated
and disclosed through the report issuance date.
Currency
Translation
Assets and liabilities of international entities are translated
at period-end exchange rates and income and expenses are
translated using weighted-average exchange rates for the period.
Translation adjustments are included as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income.
Cash and Cash
Equivalents
We consider all liquid investments with original maturities of
three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Marketable
Securities
Marketable securities consist primarily of time deposits held at
non-U.S. local
banks. We generally hold these instruments for a period of
greater than three months, but no longer than 12 months.
Marketable securities are classified as
available-for-sale
securities.
No
mark-to-market
adjustments were required during fiscal 2011, 2010 or 2009
because the carrying value of the securities approximated the
market value. We did not liquidate any
available-for-sale
securities prior to maturity in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009.
Accounts
Receivable
In the normal course of business, we extend credit to customers
that satisfy pre-defined credit criteria. We believe that we
have little concentration of credit risk due to the diversity of
our customer base. Accounts receivable, are shown net of
allowances and anticipated discounts on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. An allowance for doubtful accounts is determined through
analysis of the aging of accounts receivable at the date of the
consolidated financial statements, assessments of collectability
based on historical trends and an evaluation of the impact of
current and projected
54
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
economic conditions. We monitor the collectability of our
accounts receivable on an ongoing basis by analyzing the aging
of our accounts receivable, assessing the credit worthiness of
our customers and evaluating the impact of reasonably likely
changes in economic conditions that may impact credit risks. Our
accounts receivable are not collateralized.
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of
first-in,
first-out cost or market value.
Property, Plant
and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are reported at cost less
accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is primarily recorded on
a straight-line basis for consolidated financial statement
reporting purposes and using a combination of accelerated and
straight-line methods for tax purposes.
The estimated useful lives are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
25 40 years
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
3 10 years
|
|
Molds and dies
|
|
|
3 4 years
|
|
We perform reviews for impairment of long-lived assets whenever
adverse events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value
of an asset may not be recoverable. When indicators of
impairment are present, we evaluate the carrying value of the
long-lived assets in relation to the operating performance and
future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying assets. We
adjust the net book value of the underlying assets to fair value
if the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows is
less than book value.
Goodwill
Goodwill is recorded when the purchase price paid for an
acquisition exceeds the estimated fair value of the net
identified tangible and intangible assets acquired. We perform
an annual review in the fourth quarter of each year, or more
frequently if indicators of potential impairment exist, to
determine if the carrying value of the recorded goodwill is
impaired. The impairment review process compares the fair value
of the reporting unit in which goodwill resides to its carrying
value. Reporting units may be operating segments as a whole or
an operation one level below an operating segment, referred to
as a component.
Our goodwill impairment reviews require a two-step process. The
first step of the review compares the estimated fair value of
the reporting unit against its aggregate carrying value,
including goodwill. We estimate the fair value of our segments
using the income and market methods of valuation, which includes
the use of estimated discounted cash flows. Based on this
analysis, if we determine the carrying value of the segment
exceeds its fair value, then we complete the second step to
determine the fair value of net assets in the segment and
quantify the amount of goodwill impairment.
Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments (OTTI)
For
available-for-sale
securities, we presume an OTTI decline in value if the quoted
market price of the security is 20% or more below the
investments cost basis for a continuous period of six
months or more. However, the presumption of an OTTI decline in
value may be overcome if there is persuasive evidence indicating
that the decline is temporary in nature. For investments
accounted for under the equity method, we evaluate all known
quantitative and qualitative factors in addition to
55
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
quoted market prices in determining whether an OTTI decline in
value exists. Factors that we consider important in evaluating
whether a potential OTTI exists, include historical operating
performance, future financial projections, business plans for
new products or concepts and strength of balance sheet.
Pension and Other
Postretirement Plan Benefits
Pension and other postretirement plan benefits are expensed as
employees earn such benefits. The recognition of expense is
significantly impacted by estimates made by management such as
discount rates used to value certain liabilities, expected
return on assets and future healthcare costs. We use third-party
specialists to assist management in appropriately measuring the
expense associated with pension and other postretirement plan
benefits.
Revenue
Recognition
We recognize net revenue when in the normal course of our
business the following conditions are met: (i) a purchase
order has been received from the customer with a corresponding
order acknowledgement sent to the customer confirming delivery,
price and payment terms, (ii) product has been shipped (FOB
origin) or delivered (FOB destination) and title has clearly
transferred to the customer or customer carrier, (iii) the
price to the buyer is fixed and determinable for sales with an
estimate of allowances made based on historical experience and
(iv) there is reasonable assurance of collectability.
We record net revenue on a consignment sale when a customer has
taken title of product which is stored in either the
customers warehouse or that of a third party.
From time to time, we will discontinue or obsolete products that
we have formerly sold. When this is done, an accrual for
estimated returns is established at the time of the announcement
of product discontinuation or obsolescence.
We typically warrant that our products will conform to Molex
specifications and that our products will be free from material
defects in materials and manufacturing, and generally limit our
liability to the replacement of defective parts or the cash
value of replacement parts. We will not accept returned goods
unless the customer makes a claim in writing and management
authorizes the return. Returns result primarily from defective
products or shipping discrepancies. A reserve for estimated
returns is established at the time of sale based on historical
return experience and is recorded as a reduction of net revenue.
We provide certain distributors with an inventory allowance for
returns or scrap equal to a percentage of qualified purchases.
At the time of sale, we record as a reduction of net revenue a
reserve for estimated inventory allowances based on a fixed
percentage of sales that we authorized to distributors.
From time to time we in our sole discretion will grant price
allowances to customers. At the time of sale, we record as a
reduction of net revenue a reserve for estimated price
allowances based on historical allowances authorized and
approved solely at our discretion.
Other allowances include customer quantity and price
discrepancies. At the time of sale, we record as a reduction of
net revenue a reserve for other allowances based on historical
experience. We believe we can reasonably and reliably estimate
the amounts of future allowances.
Shipping and
Handling Costs
Shipping and handling costs are expensed as incurred and
included in cost of sales.
56
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Research and
Development
Costs incurred in connection with the development of new
products and applications are charged to operations as incurred.
Research and development costs are included in selling, general
and administrative expenses and totaled $170.1 million,
$154.0 million and $159.2 million in fiscal 2011, 2010
and 2009, respectively.
Advertising
Advertising costs are charged to operations as incurred and are
included in selling, general and administrative expenses.
Income
Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on
differences between the financial statement and tax bases of
assets and liabilities using presently enacted tax rates. We
have operations that are subject to income and other similar
taxes in foreign countries. The estimation of the income tax
amounts that we record involves the interpretation of complex
tax laws and regulations, evaluation of tax audit findings and
assessment of the impact foreign taxes may have on domestic
taxes. A valuation allowance is provided to offset deferred tax
assets if, based on available evidence, it is more likely than
not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized.
Provision is made for taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign
subsidiaries and related companies to the extent that such
earnings are not deemed to be permanently invested.
Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
We use derivative instruments to manage our foreign exchange and
commodity cost exposures. All derivative instruments are
recognized at fair value in other current assets or liabilities.
We use derivative instruments to offset the impact of exchange
rate volatility on certain assets and liabilities, including
intercompany receivables and payables denominated in
non-functional currencies. These instruments have not been
designated as hedges, and the gains or losses on these
derivatives, along with the offsetting losses or gains due to
the fluctuation of exchange rates on the underlying foreign
currency denominated assets and liabilities, are recognized in
other income (expense).
We also use derivative instruments to hedge the variability of
gold and copper costs. These instruments are designated as cash
flow hedges. Gains and losses of the effective hedges are
recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive
income and reclassified to cost of sales during the period the
commodity is sold.
Derivative instruments may give rise to counterparty credit
risk. To mitigate this risk, our counterparties are required to
have investment grade credit ratings.
Stock-Based
Compensation
We have granted nonqualified and incentive stock options and
restricted stock to our directors, officers and employees under
our stock plans pursuant to the terms of such plans. We measure
stock-based compensation expense based on the fair value of the
award on the date of grant. We recognize compensation expense
for the fair value of restricted stock grants issued based on
the closing stock price on the date of grant. Compensation
expense recognized on shares issued under our Employee Stock
Purchase Plan is based on the value of an option to purchase
shares of our stock at a 15 percent discount to the stock
price.
57
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Contingencies
In accordance with ASC 450, Contingencies, we analyze
whether it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a
liability has been incurred, and whether the amount of loss can
be reasonably estimated. If the loss contingency is both
probable and reasonably estimable, we accrue for costs
associated with the loss contingency, including direct costs
incurred. If no accrual is made but the loss contingency is
reasonably possible, we disclose the nature of the contingency
and the related estimate of possible loss or range of loss if
such an estimate can be made. Loss contingencies include, but
are not limited to, possible losses related to legal proceedings
and regulatory compliance matters. Liabilities established to
provide for contingencies are adjusted as further information
develops, circumstances change, or contingencies are resolved.
Accounting
Changes
Uncertainty in
Income Taxes
We adopted the provisions of
ASC 740-10,
Accounting for Income Taxes, effective July 1, 2009. ASC
740-10
requires application of a more likely than not
threshold to the recognition and derecognition of tax positions.
The adoption of
ASC 740-10
did not have a material impact on our statement of financial
position or results of operations.
New Accounting
Pronouncements
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2011-05,
Comprehensive Income (Topic 220). This new guidance requires the
components of net income and other comprehensive income to be
either presented in one continuous statement, referred to as the
statement of comprehensive income, or in two separate, but
consecutive statements. This new guidance eliminates the current
option to report other comprehensive income and its components
in the statement of stockholders equity. While the new
guidance changes the presentation of comprehensive income, there
are no changes to the components that are recognized in net
income or other comprehensive income under current accounting
guidance. This new guidance is effective for us for the quarter
ended March 31, 2012 and will amend our presentation of the
components of comprehensive income.
In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2011-04,
Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820), to achieve common fair value
measurement and disclosure requirements between U.S. GAAP
and International Financial Reporting Standards. This new
guidance, which is effective for us for the quarter ended
March 31, 2012, amends current U.S. GAAP fair value
measurement and disclosure guidance to include increased
transparency around valuation inputs and investment
categorization. We do not expect the adoption will have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
3.
|
Unauthorized
Activities in Japan
|
As we previously reported in our fiscal 2010 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
we launched an investigation into unauthorized activities at
Molex Japan Co., Ltd. in April 2010. We learned that an
individual working in Molex Japans finance group obtained
unauthorized loans from third-party lenders, that included in at
least one instance the attempted unauthorized pledge of Molex
Japan facilities as security, in Molex Japans name that
were used to cover losses resulting from unauthorized trading,
including margin trading, in Molex Japans name. We also
learned that the individual misappropriated funds from Molex
Japans accounts to cover losses from unauthorized trading.
The individual admitted to forging documentation in arranging
and concealing the transactions. We retained outside legal
counsel, and they retained forensic accountants, to investigate
the matter. The investigation has been completed. Based on our
consultation with legal counsel in Japan and the information
58
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
learned from the investigation, we intend to vigorously contest
the enforceability of the outstanding unauthorized loans and any
attempt by the lender to obtain payment.
As previously reported in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended June 30, 2010, based on the results of
the completed investigation, we recorded for accounting purposes
an accrued liability for the effect of unauthorized activities
pending the resolution of these matters including the legal
proceedings reported in Note 20.
We believe these unauthorized activities and related losses
occurred from at least as early as 1988 through 2010, with
approximately $167.4 million of losses occurring prior to
June 30, 2007. The accrued liability for these potential
net losses was $182.5 million as of June 30, 2011,
including $16.6 million in cumulative foreign currency
translation, which was recorded as a component of accumulated
other comprehensive income. To the extent we prevail in not
having to pay all or any portion of the outstanding unauthorized
loans, we would recognize a gain in that amount. In addition, we
have a contingent liability of $31.2 million for other
loan-related expenses, interest expense and delay damages on the
outstanding unauthorized loans.
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed by dividing net
income by the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding during the year. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing
net income by the weighted-average number of common shares and
dilutive common shares outstanding, which includes stock
options, during the year. A reconciliation of the basic average
common shares outstanding to diluted average common shares
outstanding as of June 30 follows (in thousands, except per
share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
298,808
|
|
|
$
|
76,930
|
|
|
$
|
(322,036
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
174,812
|
|
|
|
173,803
|
|
|
|
174,598
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock options
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
|
857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
175,943
|
|
|
|
174,660
|
|
|
|
174,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
(1.84
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.70
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
(1.84
|
)
|
Excluded from the computations above were anti-dilutive shares
of 5.6 million, 7.2 million and 9.2 million in
fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, we completed an asset
acquisition of an active optical cable business for
$24.6 million and recorded goodwill of $14.6 million.
The purchase price includes contingent consideration up to
$5.8 million payable through fiscal 2013 upon the seller
meeting certain criteria. The purchase price allocation is
preliminary and subject to revision as more detailed analysis is
completed and additional information about the fair value of
assets and liabilities becomes available.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, we completed an asset
purchase of a company in China for $10.1 million and
recorded goodwill of $2.2 million.
59
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
During fiscal 2009, we completed the acquisition of two
companies and a joint venture in cash transactions approximating
$74.8 million. We recorded additional goodwill of
$27.9 million in connection with the acquisitions.
|
|
6.
|
Restructuring
Costs and Asset Impairments
|
Restructuring costs and asset impairments consist of the
following at June 30 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Severance costs
|
|
$
|
79,609
|
|
|
$
|
110,155
|
|
Asset impairments
|
|
|
37,296
|
|
|
|
21,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
116,905
|
|
|
|
131,283
|
|
Intangible asset impairments
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
16,300
|
|
Other charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring charges and asset impairments
|
|
$
|
117,139
|
|
|
$
|
151,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Molex
Restructuring Plans
During fiscal 2007, we undertook a multi-year restructuring plan
designed to reduce costs and to improve return on invested
capital in connection with a new global organization that was
effective July 1, 2007. A majority of the plan related to
facilities located in North America, Europe and Japan and, in
general, the movement of manufacturing activities at these
plants to other lower-cost facilities. We completed our
restructuring program on June 30, 2010 and cumulative
expense since we announced the restructuring plan of
$314.8 million.
In fiscal 2010, we recognized net restructuring costs related to
employee severance and benefit arrangements for approximately
1,000 employees, resulting in a charge of
$79.6 million. A large part of these employee terminations
resulted from plant closings in Europe. We recognized asset
impairment charges of $37.3 million to write-down assets to
fair value less the cost to sell.
In fiscal 2009, we recognized net restructuring costs related to
employee severance and benefit arrangements for approximately
6,600 employees, resulting in a charge of
$110.1 million. A large part of these employee terminations
resulted from plant closings in Europe and Asia. We recognized
asset impairment charges of $41.4 million to write-down
assets to fair value less the cost to sell. Restructuring costs
and asset impairments in fiscal 2009 included intangible asset
impairments of $16.3 million due to lower projected future
net revenue and profit in our Industrial business unit of our
Custom & Electrical segment.
60
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
A summary of the restructuring charges and asset impairments for
the fiscal years ended June 30 follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Connector:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance costs
|
|
$
|
64,311
|
|
|
$
|
73,658
|
|
Asset impairments
|
|
|
35,962
|
|
|
|
18,468
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
100,273
|
|
|
$
|
93,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Custom & Electrical:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance costs
|
|
$
|
11,233
|
|
|
$
|
22,483
|
|
Asset impairments
|
|
|
1,001
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
12,234
|
|
|
$
|
39,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and Other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance costs
|
|
$
|
4,065
|
|
|
$
|
14,014
|
|
Asset impairments
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
2,131
|
|
Other
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
2,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,632
|
|
|
$
|
18,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance costs
|
|
$
|
79,609
|
|
|
$
|
110,155
|
|
Asset impairments
|
|
|
37,296
|
|
|
|
21,128
|
|
Other
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
20,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
117,139
|
|
|
$
|
151,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the accrued severance balance are summarized as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
18,794
|
|
Charges to expense
|
|
|
110,155
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(55,168
|
)
|
Non-cash related costs
|
|
|
(3,897
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
69,884
|
|
Charges to expense
|
|
|
79,609
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(117,911
|
)
|
Non-cash related costs
|
|
|
(4,684
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
26,898
|
|
Charges to expense
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(15,128
|
)
|
Non-cash related costs
|
|
|
2,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
14,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Inventories, less allowances of $41.4 million at
June 30, 2011 and $39.1 million at June 30, 2010,
consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
91,362
|
|
|
$
|
86,338
|
|
Work in progress
|
|
|
143,888
|
|
|
|
139,922
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
300,703
|
|
|
|
243,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories
|
|
$
|
535,953
|
|
|
$
|
469,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Property, Plant
and Equipment
|
At June 30, property, plant and equipment consisted of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Land and improvements
|
|
$
|
73,755
|
|
|
$
|
69,217
|
|
Buildings and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
787,092
|
|
|
|
705,207
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
1,833,221
|
|
|
|
1,629,051
|
|
Molds and dies
|
|
|
807,179
|
|
|
|
743,166
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
86,832
|
|
|
|
86,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,588,079
|
|
|
|
3,233,022
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(2,419,631
|
)
|
|
|
(2,177,878
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment
|
|
$
|
1,168,448
|
|
|
$
|
1,055,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for property, plant and equipment was
$236.6 million, $232.6 million and $245.5 million
in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
At June 30, changes to goodwill were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
131,910
|
|
|
$
|
128,494
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
14,615
|
|
|
|
2,791
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
2,927
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
149,452
|
|
|
$
|
131,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recorded a $93.1 million goodwill impairment charge
during the second quarter of fiscal 2009 based on lower
projected future net revenue and profit growth in the
Transportation business unit of our Connector segment. We
determined that there were indicators of impairment resulting
from the sudden economic downturn and potential liquidity risk
in the automotive industry. The economic downturn had a negative
impact on the business units operating results and the
potential liquidity risk extended our estimate for the
industrys economic recovery. These factors resulted in
lower growth and profit expectations for the business unit,
which resulted in the goodwill impairment charge.
We recorded a $171.0 million goodwill impairment charge
during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 based on lower
projected future net revenue and profit growth in the Industrial
business unit of our Custom & Electrical segment. The
economic downturn had a negative impact on the business
units
62
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
operating results and it became evident during the fourth
quarter that the business units operating results were not
recovering in line with the other operating segments due to our
customers global excess capacity. These factors resulted
in lower growth and profit expectations for the business unit,
which resulted in the goodwill impairment charge.
|
|
10.
|
Other Intangible
Assets
|
All of our intangible assets other than goodwill are included in
other assets. Assets with indefinite lives represent acquired
trade names. The value of these indefinite-lived intangible
assets was $4.3 million at June 30, 2011 and
June 30, 2010. During fiscal 2009, we recorded an
impairment charge of $16.3 million to our indefinite-lived
intangible assets on lower projected future revenue and profit
growth in the Industrial business unit of our Custom &
Electrical segment. Intangible property assets with finite lives
primarily represent customer relationships and rights acquired
under technology licenses and are amortized over the periods of
benefit.
The components of finite-lived intangible assets at June 30 are
summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Customer-related
|
|
$
|
32,555
|
|
|
$
|
(7,731
|
)
|
|
$
|
24,824
|
|
|
$
|
31,191
|
|
|
$
|
(6,193
|
)
|
|
$
|
24,998
|
|
Technology-based
|
|
|
26,795
|
|
|
|
(15,697
|
)
|
|
|
11,098
|
|
|
|
23,510
|
|
|
|
(13,039
|
)
|
|
|
10,471
|
|
License fees
|
|
|
8,491
|
|
|
|
(6,597
|
)
|
|
|
1,894
|
|
|
|
8,485
|
|
|
|
(5,517
|
)
|
|
|
2,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
67,841
|
|
|
$
|
(30,025
|
)
|
|
$
|
37,816
|
|
|
$
|
63,186
|
|
|
$
|
(24,749
|
)
|
|
$
|
38,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We estimate that we have no significant residual value related
to our intangible assets.
During fiscal year 2011 and 2010, we recorded additions to
intangible assets of $4.0 million and $2.9 million,
respectively. The components of intangible assets acquired
during fiscal 2011 and 2010 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Customer-related
|
|
$
|
900
|
|
|
|
7.0 years
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Technology-based
|
|
|
3,114
|
|
|
|
9.0 years
|
|
|
|
2,107
|
|
|
|
8.6 years
|
|
License fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
825
|
|
|
|
3.2 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired intangibles are generally amortized on a straight-line
basis over weighted average lives. Intangible assets
amortization expense was $5.3 million for fiscal year 2011
and $6.3 million for fiscal
63
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
year 2010 and 2009. The estimated future amortization expense
related to intangible assets as of June 30, 2011 is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
5,800
|
|
2013
|
|
|
4,439
|
|
2014
|
|
|
3,756
|
|
2015
|
|
|
3,609
|
|
2016 and thereafter
|
|
|
20,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
37,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes for fiscal years ended
June 30, is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
198,349
|
|
|
$
|
21,985
|
|
|
$
|
(215,328
|
)
|
International
|
|
|
231,590
|
|
|
|
109,504
|
|
|
|
(106,245
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
429,939
|
|
|
$
|
131,489
|
|
|
$
|
(321,573
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of income tax expense (benefit) for fiscal years
ended June 30, follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Federal
|
|
$
|
63,630
|
|
|
$
|
13,658
|
|
|
$
|
5,613
|
|
State
|
|
|
4,501
|
|
|
|
1,553
|
|
|
|
1,122
|
|
International
|
|
|
25,486
|
|
|
|
41,053
|
|
|
|
22,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total currently payable
|
|
$
|
93,617
|
|
|
$
|
56,264
|
|
|
$
|
29,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Federal
|
|
$
|
14,764
|
|
|
$
|
(6,499
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,589
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,460
|
)
|
|
|
759
|
|
International
|
|
|
22,750
|
|
|
|
6,254
|
|
|
|
(23,712
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred
|
|
|
37,514
|
|
|
|
(1,705
|
)
|
|
|
(28,542
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense
|
|
$
|
131,131
|
|
|
$
|
54,559
|
|
|
$
|
463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Our effective tax rate differs from the U.S. federal income
tax rate for the years ended June 30, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
U.S. Federal income tax rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Permanent tax exemptions
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
(11.9
|
)
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Repatriation of foreign earnings
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
Provision for tax contingencies
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
Reduction of benefit from share-based payments
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in health care legislation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30.1
|
)
|
State income taxes, net of Federal tax benefit
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
Foreign tax rates less than U.S. Federal tax rate (net)
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
30.5
|
%
|
|
|
41.5
|
%
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effective tax rate for fiscal 2011 was 30.5%. The effective
tax rate for fiscal 2010 was higher than fiscal 2011 due to:
(1) income tax expense recorded during fiscal 2010 of
$7.7 million, due primarily to the reversal of an estimated
tax benefit resulting from a significant number of employee
stock options that expired unexercised, (2) a charge due to
legislation passed during the year which includes a provision
that reduces the deductibility, for Federal income tax purposes,
of retiree prescription drug benefits to the extent they are
reimbursed under Medicare Part D, (3) tax losses
generated in
non-U.S. jurisdictions
for which no tax benefit has been recognized, and
(4) additional U.S. tax cost to repatriate earning
from
non-U.S. subsidiaries
during the year The effective tax rate in fiscal 2009 was (0.1%)
due primarily to charges for goodwill impairments for which no
tax benefit was available and increases in tax reserves based on
evaluation of certain tax positions taken.
At June 30, 2011, we had approximately $241.9 million
of
non-U.S. net
operating loss carryforwards. Approximately 69.1% of the
non-U.S. net
operating losses can be carried forward indefinitely. The
remaining losses have expiration dates over the next five to ten
years.
A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than
not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be
realized. As of June 30, 2011 and 2010, we recorded
valuation allowances of $67.3 million and
$77.4 million, respectively, against the
non-U.S. net
operating loss carryforwards.
65
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The components of net deferred tax assets and liabilities as of
June 30 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
|
|
$
|
26,242
|
|
|
$
|
35,056
|
|
Stock option and other benefits
|
|
|
19,099
|
|
|
|
18,236
|
|
Capitalized research and development
|
|
|
3,942
|
|
|
|
7,798
|
|
Foreign tax credits
|
|
|
4,111
|
|
|
|
8,474
|
|
Net operating losses
|
|
|
70,916
|
|
|
|
101,576
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4,265
|
|
|
|
2,633
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
10,143
|
|
|
|
11,443
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
4,625
|
|
|
|
8,278
|
|
Accrual for unauthorized activities in Japan
|
|
|
77,559
|
|
|
|
73,205
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
9,540
|
|
|
|
9,596
|
|
Patents
|
|
|
5,701
|
|
|
|
5,992
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
7,725
|
|
|
|
6,491
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
33,665
|
|
|
|
28,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets before valuation allowance
|
|
|
277,533
|
|
|
|
316,957
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(71,858
|
)
|
|
|
(80,935
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
205,675
|
|
|
|
236,022
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
(35,206
|
)
|
|
|
(29,192
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(3,133
|
)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(38,339
|
)
|
|
|
(29,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
167,336
|
|
|
$
|
206,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net deferred tax amounts reported in the consolidated
balance sheet as of June 30 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net deferred taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current asset
|
|
$
|
129,158
|
|
|
$
|
112,531
|
|
Non-current asset
|
|
|
38,178
|
|
|
|
94,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
167,336
|
|
|
$
|
206,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have not provided for U.S. deferred income taxes or
foreign withholding taxes on approximately $1.3 billion of
undistributed earnings of certain
non-U.S. subsidiaries
as of June 30, 2011. These earnings are intended to be
permanently invested. It is not practicable to estimate the
additional income taxes that would be paid if the permanently
reinvested earnings were distributed.
We are currently benefitting from preferential income tax
treatment in jurisdictions including Singapore, China, Thailand,
Philippines, Mexico, Poland and Vietnam. As a result of such tax
incentives, our tax expense was reduced by approximately
$8.7 million during fiscal 2011. The expiration of various
tax holidays is scheduled in whole or in part during fiscal 2012
through fiscal
66
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
2019. Many of these holidays may be extended when certain
conditions are met or terminated if we fail to satisfy certain
requirements, which could have an unfavorable tax rate impact.
We are subject to tax in U.S. federal, state and foreign
tax jurisdictions. It is reasonably possible that the amount of
unrecognized tax benefits that is, the aggregate tax effect of
differences between tax return positions and the benefits
recognized in our financial statements, will change over the
next twelve months; however, we do not expect significant
changes during that time. The balance of unrecognized tax
benefits as of June 30 follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits
|
|
$
|
18,375
|
|
|
$
|
20,142
|
|
|
$
|
23,509
|
|
Portion that, if recognized, would reduce tax expense and
effective tax rate
|
|
|
18,375
|
|
|
|
20,142
|
|
|
|
23,509
|
|
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of
unrecognized tax benefits follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
23,509
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
|
|
|
|
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
1,983
|
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
(5,350
|
)
|
Reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
20,142
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
|
|
|
|
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
3,111
|
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
(1,080
|
)
|
Reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations
|
|
|
(3,798
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
18,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The examination of U.S. federal income tax returns for
2004, 2005 and 2006 was completed during fiscal 2010. We have
substantially completed all U.S. federal income tax matters
for tax years through 2007. The tax years 2007 through 2010
remain open to examination by all major taxing jurisdictions to
which we are subject.
It is our practice to recognize interest or penalties related to
income tax matters in tax expense. As of June 30, 2011,
there were no material interest or penalty amounts to accrue.
|
|
12.
|
Profit Sharing,
Pension and Post Retirement Medical Benefit Plans
|
Profit Sharing
Plans
We provide discretionary savings and other defined contribution
plans covering substantially all of our U.S. employees and
certain employees in international subsidiaries. Employer
contributions to these plans of $14.5 million,
$9.4 million and $2.3 million were charged to
operations during fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Effective January 1, 2011, U.S. defined contribution
plans were merged into a 401(k) plan with a non-discretionary
base company contribution and the opportunity for discretionary
savings and employer matching contributions.
67
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Pension
Plans
We sponsor
and/or
contribute to pension plans, including defined benefit plans,
covering substantially all U.S. plant hourly employees and
certain employees in
non-U.S. subsidiaries.
The benefits are primarily based on years of service and the
employees compensation for certain periods during their
last years of employment. Our pension obligations are measured
as of June 30 for all plans. We amended a defined benefit
pension plan in the U.S. to close participation and freeze
benefit accruals under the plan, effective December 31,
2010, reducing the pension liability by $11.8 million.
Non-U.S. plans
are primarily in Germany, Ireland, Japan, Korea and Taiwan.
Post Retirement
Medical Benefit Plans
We have retiree health care plans that cover the majority of our
U.S. employees. Employees hired before January 1,
1994 may become eligible for these benefits if they reach
age 55, with age plus years of service equal to 70.
Employees hired after January 1, 1994 may become
eligible for these benefits if they reach age 60, with age
plus years of service equal to 80. The cost of retiree health
care is accrued over the period in which the employees become
eligible for such benefits. We continue to fund benefit costs
primarily as claims are paid. We discontinued the plans in
January 2009 for all employees who were not within 10 years
of qualifying. There are no significant postretirement health
care benefit plans outside of the United States.
Benefit
Obligation and Plan Assets
The accumulated benefit obligations as of June 30, were as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension
|
|
Non-U.S. Pension
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
Benefits
|
|
Medical Benefits
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
66,028
|
|
|
$
|
63,949
|
|
|
$
|
119,740
|
|
|
$
|
116,690
|
|
|
$
|
41,168
|
|
|
$
|
45,402
|
|
68
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The changes in the benefit obligations and plan assets for the
plans described above were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Pension
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Medical Benefits
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change in projected benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
71,775
|
|
|
$
|
54,500
|
|
|
$
|
127,140
|
|
|
$
|
116,781
|
|
|
$
|
45,402
|
|
|
$
|
36,781
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
1,487
|
|
|
|
2,521
|
|
|
|
6,075
|
|
|
|
5,441
|
|
|
|
1,369
|
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
3,934
|
|
|
|
3,799
|
|
|
|
4,198
|
|
|
|
4,183
|
|
|
|
2,469
|
|
|
|
2,486
|
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
|
919
|
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
2,322
|
|
|
|
13,826
|
|
|
|
(18,340
|
)
|
|
|
15,871
|
|
|
|
(7,174
|
)
|
|
|
6,179
|
|
Plan amendment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
(217
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special termination benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Actual expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of curtailment or settlement
|
|
|
(5,772
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,107
|
)
|
|
|
(14,362
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business combination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid to plan participants
|
|
|
(2,317
|
)
|
|
|
(2,871
|
)
|
|
|
(2,686
|
)
|
|
|
(2,043
|
)
|
|
|
(1,769
|
)
|
|
|
(2,115
|
)
|
Changes in foreign currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,431
|
|
|
|
(3,722
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
71,429
|
|
|
$
|
71,775
|
|
|
$
|
130,897
|
|
|
$
|
127,140
|
|
|
$
|
41,168
|
|
|
$
|
45,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Pension
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Medical Benefits
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning fair value of plan assets
|
|
$
|
56,762
|
|
|
$
|
48,565
|
|
|
$
|
51,928
|
|
|
$
|
46,577
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
13,806
|
|
|
|
7,323
|
|
|
|
2,081
|
|
|
|
5,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
2,510
|
|
|
|
3,745
|
|
|
|
14,072
|
|
|
|
12,099
|
|
|
|
921
|
|
|
|
1,196
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,107
|
)
|
|
|
(7,663
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
|
919
|
|
Business combination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid to plan participants
|
|
|
(2,317
|
)
|
|
|
(2,871
|
)
|
|
|
(2,686
|
)
|
|
|
(2,043
|
)
|
|
|
(1,769
|
)
|
|
|
(2,115
|
)
|
Changes in foreign currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,656
|
|
|
|
(3,921
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending fair value of plan assets
|
|
$
|
70,761
|
|
|
$
|
56,762
|
|
|
$
|
71,867
|
|
|
$
|
51,928
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The funded status, the amount by which plan assets exceed (or
are less than) the projected benefit obligation, was as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension
|
|
Non-U.S. Pension
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
Benefits
|
|
Medical Benefits
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Funded Status
|
|
$
|
(668
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,013
|
)
|
|
$
|
(59,030
|
)
|
|
$
|
(75,212
|
)
|
|
$
|
(41,168
|
)
|
|
$
|
(45,402
|
)
|
69
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets were
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Pension
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Medical Benefits
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Accrued pension and other post retirement benefits
|
|
$
|
(668
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,013
|
)
|
|
$
|
(59,030
|
)
|
|
$
|
(75,212
|
)
|
|
$
|
(41,168
|
)
|
|
$
|
(45,402
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
9,843
|
|
|
|
22,798
|
|
|
|
30,889
|
|
|
|
45,271
|
|
|
|
(1,571
|
)
|
|
|
4,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$
|
9,175
|
|
|
$
|
7,785
|
|
|
$
|
(28,141
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,941
|
)
|
|
$
|
(42,739
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40,533
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts comprising accumulated other comprehensive income
before taxes were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Pension
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Medical Benefits
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net transition liability
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Net actuarial (gain) loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,787
|
|
|
|
2,474
|
|
|
|
43,099
|
|
|
|
(8,347
|
)
|
|
|
15,280
|
|
Net prior service costs
|
|
|
9,843
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
28,316
|
|
|
|
2,046
|
|
|
|
6,776
|
|
|
|
(10,411
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit plans, net
|
|
$
|
9,843
|
|
|
$
|
22,798
|
|
|
$
|
30,889
|
|
|
$
|
45,271
|
|
|
$
|
(1,571
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net gain recognized in other comprehensive income was
$33.8 million in fiscal 2011.
Assumptions
Weighted average actuarial assumptions used to determine benefit
obligations for the plans were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Pension
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Medical Benefits
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health care cost trend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
Ultimate health care cost trend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Years of ultimate rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
For the postretirement medical benefit plan, a one-percentage
point change in the assumed health care cost trend rates would
have the following effect (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Effect on total service and interest cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase 100 basis points
|
|
$
|
676
|
|
|
$
|
539
|
|
|
$
|
708
|
|
Decrease 100 basis points
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
(588
|
)
|
Effect on benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase 100 basis points
|
|
$
|
6,827
|
|
|
$
|
6,778
|
|
|
$
|
4,882
|
|
Decrease 100 basis points
|
|
|
(5,621
|
)
|
|
|
(5,955
|
)
|
|
|
(4,095
|
)
|
70
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Weighted-average actuarial assumptions used to determine costs
for the plans were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension
|
|
Non-U.S. Pension
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
Benefits
|
|
Medical Benefits
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health care cost trend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
Ultimate health care cost trend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Years of ultimate rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
The discount rate is determined based on high-quality fixed
income investments that match the duration of expected benefit
payments. The discount rate used to determine the present value
of our future U.S. pension obligations is based on a yield
curve constructed from a portfolio of high quality corporate
debt securities with various maturities. Each years
expected future benefit payments are discounted to their present
value at the appropriate yield curve rate, thereby generating
the overall discount rate for U.S. pension obligations. The
discount rates for our foreign pension plans are selected by
using a yield curve approach or by reference to high quality
corporate bond rates in those countries that have developed
corporate bond markets. In those countries where developed
corporate bond markets do not exist, the discount rates are
selected by reference to local government bond rates with a
premium added to reflect the additional risk for corporate
bonds. The expected return on plan assets noted above represents
a forward projection of the average rate of earnings expected on
the pension assets. We estimated this rate based on historical
returns of similarly diversified portfolios. The rate of
compensation increase represents the long-term assumption for
expected increases to salaries for pay-related plans.
Net Periodic
Benefit Cost
The components of net periodic benefit cost for our plans
consist of the following for the years ended June 30 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Medical Benefits
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
1,487
|
|
|
$
|
2,521
|
|
|
$
|
2,404
|
|
|
$
|
6,075
|
|
|
$
|
5,441
|
|
|
$
|
5,872
|
|
|
$
|
1,369
|
|
|
$
|
1,082
|
|
|
$
|
1,741
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
3,934
|
|
|
|
3,799
|
|
|
|
3,612
|
|
|
|
4,198
|
|
|
|
4,183
|
|
|
|
4,319
|
|
|
|
2,469
|
|
|
|
2,486
|
|
|
|
2,883
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(5,057
|
)
|
|
|
(4,497
|
)
|
|
|
(4,789
|
)
|
|
|
(2,738
|
)
|
|
|
(2,627
|
)
|
|
|
(3,345
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
(2,065
|
)
|
|
|
(2,065
|
)
|
|
|
(1,354
|
)
|
Amortization of unrecognized transition obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized actuarial losses
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,172
|
|
|
|
1,691
|
|
|
|
647
|
|
|
|
1,331
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
818
|
|
Curtailment or settlement loss (gain)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
(2,006
|
)
|
|
|
3,606
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
(3,702
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
1,120
|
|
|
$
|
2,918
|
|
|
$
|
1,389
|
|
|
$
|
10,410
|
|
|
$
|
6,943
|
|
|
$
|
11,396
|
|
|
$
|
3,127
|
|
|
$
|
2,275
|
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of accumulated other comprehensive income that was
reclassified as a component of net period benefit cost in fiscal
2011 was $8.7 million. The amount in accumulated other
comprehensive income that is expected to be recognized as a
component of net periodic benefit cost in fiscal 2012 is
$0.2 million.
71
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Plan
Assets
Our overall investment strategy for the assets in the pension
funds is to achieve a balance between the goals of growing plan
assets and keeping risks at a reasonable level over a long-term
investment horizon. In order to reduce unnecessary risk, the
pension funds are diversified across several asset classes with
a focus on total return. The target U.S. pension asset
allocation is 67% public equity investments and 33% fixed income
investments. The fair value of our pension plan assets at
June 30, 2011 by asset category are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
Measured
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
at Fair
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
U.S. Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and marketable securities
|
|
$
|
307
|
|
|
$
|
307
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic large-cap
|
|
|
14,672
|
|
|
|
14,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic mid-cap growth
|
|
|
15,653
|
|
|
|
15,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International large-cap
|
|
|
16,767
|
|
|
|
16,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emerging markets growth
|
|
|
2,218
|
|
|
|
2,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic bond funds
|
|
|
21,144
|
|
|
|
21,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-U.S.
Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and marketable securities
|
|
$
|
5,131
|
|
|
$
|
5,131
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic large-cap
|
|
|
12,064
|
|
|
|
12,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International large-cap
|
|
|
16,635
|
|
|
|
16,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,883
|
|
|
|
3,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International government bond funds
|
|
|
23,265
|
|
|
|
23,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
778
|
|
|
|
778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate
|
|
|
1,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
8,424
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
8,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the changes in Level 3
pension benefits plan assets measured at fair value on a
recurring basis for the period ended June 30, 2011 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at
|
|
Return
|
|
Net
|
|
Transfers
|
|
Fair Value at
|
|
|
July 1,
|
|
on Plan
|
|
Purchases/
|
|
Into/(Out of)
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Assets
|
|
Sales
|
|
Level 3
|
|
2011
|
|
Asset Category Insurance contracts
|
|
$
|
1,553
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,553
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Funding
Expectations
Expected funding for the U.S. pension plan and other
postretirement benefit plans for fiscal 2012 is approximately
$1.0 million and $1.2 million, respectively. Expected
funding for the
non-U.S. plans
during fiscal 2012 is approximately $14.6 million.
72
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Estimated Future
Benefit Payments
The total benefits to be paid from the U.S. and
non-U.S. pension
plans and other postretirement benefit plans are not expected to
exceed $19.0 million in any year through 2021.
Significant
Concentrations of Risk.
Significant concentrations of risk in our plan assets relate to
equity and interest rate risk. In order to ensure assets are
sufficient to pay benefits, a portion of plan assets is
allocated to equity investments that are expected over time to
earn higher returns with more volatility than fixed income
investments which more closely match pension liabilities. Within
equities, risk is mitigated by constructing a portfolio that is
broadly diversified by geography, market capitalization, manager
mandate size, investment style and process.
In order to minimize asset volatility relative to the
liabilities, a portion of plan assets are allocated to fixed
income investments that are exposed to interest rate risk. Rate
increases generally will result in a decline in fixed income
assets while reducing the present value of the liabilities.
Conversely, rate decreases will increase fixed income assets,
partially offsetting the related increase in the liabilities.
Remeasurement/Curtailment
In fiscal 2011, we amended a defined benefit pension plan in the
U.S. and remeasured the pension liability, resulting in an
$11.8 million reduction in the liability as recorded in
other comprehensive income.
In fiscal 2010, we recognized a $3.8 million pension
curtailment gain related to a plant closing in Europe and
$1.8 million pension curtailment expenses related to a
plant closing in Japan.
In fiscal 2009, we recognized a $1.6 million reduction in
cost of sales and a $2.1 million reduction in selling,
general and administrative expense due mainly to a curtailment
adjustment in our postretirement benefit plan as a result of
reducing the number of employees eligible for retiree medical
coverage. Separately, we also recognized in fiscal 2009
$3.8 million for restructuring costs resulting from
curtailment and settlement adjustments for the early termination
of participants in connection with the restructuring plan.
73
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Total debt consisted of the following at June 30 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Credit Facility
|
|
|
2.05
|
%
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
$
|
185,000
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
Unsecured bonds and term loans
|
|
|
0.77 - 1.31
|
%
|
|
|
2012 - 2013
|
|
|
|
89,342
|
|
|
|
129,225
|
|
Mortgages, industrial development bonds and other debt
|
|
|
5.92
|
%
|
|
|
2012 - 2013
|
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
5,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275,870
|
|
|
|
234,357
|
|
Less current portion of long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured bonds and term loans
|
|
|
0.77 - 1.31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,156
|
|
|
|
47,794
|
|
Mortgages, industrial development bonds and other debt
|
|
|
5.92
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
|
3,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222,794
|
|
|
|
183,434
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overdraft loan
|
|
|
2.48
|
%
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
62,060
|
|
|
|
56,565
|
|
Other short-term borrowings
|
|
|
5.92
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,628
|
|
|
|
2,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,688
|
|
|
|
59,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
342,558
|
|
|
$
|
293,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In June 2009, we entered into a $195.0 million unsecured,
three-year revolving credit facility in the United States,
amended in January 2010, September 2010 and March 2011 that was
initially scheduled to mature in June 2012 (the U.S. Credit
Facility). In connection with the September 2010 amendment, we
increased the credit line on the U.S. Credit Facility to
$270.0 million. In March 2011, we further amended the
credit facility to increase the credit line to
$350.0 million and extend the term to March 2016.
Borrowings under the U.S. Credit Facility bear interest at
a fluctuating interest rate (based on London InterBank Offered
Rate) plus an applicable percentage based on our consolidated
leverage. The applicable percentage was 150 basis points as
of June 30, 2011. The instrument governing the
U.S. Credit Facility contains customary covenants regarding
liens, debt, substantial asset sales and mergers, dividends and
investments. The U.S. Credit Facility also requires us to
maintain financial covenants pertaining to, among other things,
our consolidated leverage and fixed charge coverage. As of
June 30, 2011, we were in compliance with these covenants
and had outstanding borrowings of $185.0 million.
In March 2011, Molex Japan renewed a ¥5.0 billion
overdraft loan, with a six month term and an interest rate of
approximately 2.48%. At June 30, 2011, the balance of the
overdraft loan, which requires full repayment by the end of the
term if not renewed, approximated $62.1 million.
In March 2010, Molex Japan entered into a ¥3.0 billion
syndicated term loan for three years, with interest rates
equivalent to six month Tokyo Interbank Offered Rate (TIBOR)
plus 75 basis points and scheduled principal payments of
¥0.5 billion every six months (Syndicated Term Loan).
At June 30, 2011, the balance of the syndicated term loan
approximated $24.8 million, of which $12.4 million was
current.
74
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
In September 2009, Molex Japan issued unsecured bonds totaling
¥10.0 billion with a term of three years, an interest
rate of approximately 1.65% and scheduled principal payments of
¥1.6 billion every six months. At June 30, 2011,
the outstanding balance of the unsecured bonds approximated
$64.5 million, of which $39.7 million was current.
Certain assets, including land, buildings and equipment, secure
a portion of our long-term debt. Principal payments on long-term
debt obligations are due as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
53,076
|
|
2013
|
|
|
37,762
|
|
2014
|
|
|
32
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
185,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt obligations
|
|
$
|
275,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We had available lines of credit totaling $244.3 million at
June 30, 2011 expiring between 2011 and 2016.
We rent certain facilities and equipment under operating lease
arrangements. Some of the leases have renewal options. Future
minimum lease payments are presented below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
16,107
|
|
2013
|
|
|
8,111
|
|
2014
|
|
|
4,698
|
|
2015
|
|
|
3,448
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2,755
|
|
2017 and thereafter
|
|
|
3,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total lease payments
|
|
$
|
38,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expense was $16.6 million, $13.5 million and
$10.6 million in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
|
|
15.
|
Fair Value
Measurements
|
In accordance with
ASC 820-10,
fair value measurements are classified under the following
hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices for
identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Observable inputs other than quoted prices
substantiated by market data and observable, either directly or
indirectly for the asset or liability. This includes quoted
prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets.
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little
or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value
of the assets and liabilities.
|
75
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table summarizes our financial assets and
liabilities which are measured at fair value on a recurring
basis and subject to the disclosure requirements of
ASC 820-10
as of June 30, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
Measured
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
at Fair
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
and trading securities
|
|
$
|
26,073
|
|
|
$
|
26,073
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments, net
|
|
|
10,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
We determine the fair value of our
available-for-sale
securities based on quoted market prices (Level 1). We
generally use derivatives for hedging purposes pursuant to
ASC 815-10,
which are valued based on Level 2 inputs in the
ASC 820 fair value hierarchy. The fair value of our
derivative financial instruments is determined by a
mark-to-market
valuation based on forward curves using observable market prices.
|
|
16.
|
Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
|
We use derivative instruments to manage our foreign exchange and
commodity cost exposures. All derivative instruments are
recognized at fair value in other current assets or liabilities.
Derivatives Not
Designated as Hedging Instruments
We use one-month foreign currency forward contracts (forward
contracts) to offset the impact of exchange rate volatility on
certain assets and liabilities, including intercompany
receivables and payables denominated in non-functional
currencies. These forward contracts have not been designated as
hedges, and the gains or losses on these forward contracts,
along with the offsetting losses or gains due to the fluctuation
of exchange rates on the underlying foreign currency denominated
assets and liabilities, are recognized in other income
(expense). The notional amounts of the forward contracts were
$175.6 million and $143.6 million at June 30,
2011 and 2010, respectively, with corresponding fair values of a
$2.7 million asset at June 30, 2011 and a
$1.7 million liability at June 30, 2010.
Cash Flow
Hedges
We use derivatives in the form of call options to hedge the
variability of gold and copper costs. These derivative
instruments are designated as cash flow hedges and hedge
approximately 60% of our planned gold and copper purchases.
Gains and losses of the effective hedges are recorded as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive income and
reclassified to cost of sales during the period the commodity is
sold. The fair values of the call options were $7.8 million
and $5.4 million at June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively.
For the fiscal years ending June 30, 2011 and 2010, the
impact to accumulated other comprehensive income and earnings
from cash flow hedges follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Unrealized gain recognized in accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
$
|
231
|
|
|
$
|
2,092
|
|
Realized gain reclassified into earnings
|
|
|
7,119
|
|
|
|
5,662
|
|
We had no material derivative instruments outstanding at
June 30, 2009. The net impact of gains and losses on such
instruments was not material to the results of operations for
fiscal 2009.
76
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The shares of Common Stock, Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock are identical except as to voting
rights. Class A Common Stock has no voting rights except in
limited circumstances. So long as more than 50% of the
authorized number of shares of Class B Common Stock
continues to be outstanding, all matters submitted to a vote of
the stockholders, other than the election of directors, must be
approved by a majority of the Class B Common Stock, voting
as a class, and by a majority of the Common Stock, voting as a
class. During such period, holders of a majority of the
Class B Common Stock could veto corporate action, other
than the election of directors, which requires stockholder
approval. There are 25 million shares of preferred stock
authorized, none of which were issued or outstanding during the
three years ended June 30, 2011.
The Class B Common Stock can be converted into Common Stock
on a
share-for-share
basis at any time at the option of the holder. The authorized
Class A Common Stock would automatically convert into
Common Stock on a
share-for-share
basis at the discretion of the Board of Directors upon the
occurrence of certain events. Upon such conversion, the voting
interests of the holders of Common Stock and Class B Common
Stock would be diluted. Our Class B Common Stock
outstanding has remained at 94,255 shares during the three
years ended June 30, 2011.
The holders of the Common Stock, Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock participate equally,
share-for-share,
in any dividends that may be paid thereon if, as and when
declared by the Board of Directors or in any assets available
upon our liquidation or dissolution.
Changes in common stock for the years ended June 30 follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2008
|
|
|
112,195
|
|
|
$
|
5,610
|
|
|
|
109,841
|
|
|
$
|
5,492
|
|
|
|
(44,692
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,009,021
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
(3,959
|
)
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,507
|
)
|
|
|
(76,342
|
)
|
Issuance of stock awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
112,204
|
|
|
$
|
5,610
|
|
|
|
110,468
|
|
|
$
|
5,523
|
|
|
|
(49,433
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,089,322
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,293
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
(509
|
)
|
|
|
(8,765
|
)
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2010
|
|
|
112,204
|
|
|
$
|
5,610
|
|
|
|
111,839
|
|
|
$
|
5,592
|
|
|
|
(49,942
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,098,087
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,484
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
(414
|
)
|
|
|
(7,952
|
)
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2011
|
|
|
112,204
|
|
|
$
|
5,610
|
|
|
|
113,400
|
|
|
$
|
5,670
|
|
|
|
(50,356
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,106,039
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
18.
|
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income for the
fiscal years ended June 30 follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
$
|
403,155
|
|
|
$
|
255,383
|
|
Non-current deferred tax asset
|
|
|
13,119
|
|
|
|
16,962
|
|
Accumulated transition obligation
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
Accumulated prior service credit
|
|
|
5,873
|
|
|
|
8,354
|
|
Accumulated actuarial net loss
|
|
|
(44,935
|
)
|
|
|
(81,167
|
)
|
Unrealized gains on investments
|
|
|
3,330
|
|
|
|
1,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
380,443
|
|
|
$
|
200,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.
|
Stock Incentive
Plans
|
Share-based compensation is comprised of expense related to
stock options and stock awards. Share-based compensation cost
was $22.5 million, $27.0 million and
$26.5 million for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The income tax benefits related to share-based compensation were
$8.2 million, $9.9 million and $9.7 million for
fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Stock
Options
For fiscal 2011 and 2010, stock options that we grant to
employees who are not executive officers (non-officer
employees) are options to purchase Class A Common
Stock at an exercise price that is 100% of the fair market value
of the stock on the grant date. These grants generally vest 25%
per year beginning the first anniversary date of the grant with
a term of 10 years.
Prior to fiscal 2009, stock options granted to non-officer
employees were options to purchase Class A Common Stock at
an exercise price that was generally 50% of the fair market
value of the stock on the grant date. These grants generally
vest 25% per year beginning the first anniversary date of the
grant with a term of five years. Discounted stock options to
U.S.-based
non-officer employees are automatically exercised on the vesting
date.
The stock options that are approved for grant to executive
officers and directors are generally options to purchase
Class A Common Stock at an exercise price that is 100% of
the fair market value of the stock on the grant date. These
grants generally vest 25% per year beginning the first
anniversary date of the award with a term of 10 years. The
total number of shares authorized for stock option grants to
employees, executive officers and directors is 30.0 million.
78
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Stock option transactions are summarized as follows (exercise
price represents a weighted-average, shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2008
|
|
|
9,403
|
|
|
$
|
20.38
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2,573
|
|
|
|
17.95
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(343
|
)
|
|
|
12.27
|
|
Forfeited or expired
|
|
|
(815
|
)
|
|
|
23.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
10,818
|
|
|
$
|
19.83
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,095
|
|
|
|
15.98
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(829
|
)
|
|
|
12.76
|
|
Forfeited or expired
|
|
|
(2,186
|
)
|
|
|
22.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2010
|
|
|
8,898
|
|
|
$
|
19.27
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2,871
|
|
|
|
18.34
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(929
|
)
|
|
|
12.32
|
|
Forfeited or expired
|
|
|
(1,027
|
)
|
|
|
23.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2011
|
|
|
9,813
|
|
|
$
|
18.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2011
|
|
|
4,001
|
|
|
$
|
22.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2011, exercisable options had an aggregate
intrinsic value of $10.3 million with a weighted-average
remaining contractual life of 2.9 years. In addition, there
were 5.6 million options expected to vest, after
consideration of expected forfeitures, with an aggregate
intrinsic value of $27.2 million. Total options outstanding
had an aggregate intrinsic value of $38.7 million with a
weighted-average remaining contractual life of 5.4 years.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during fiscal
2011, 2010 and 2009 was $7.8 million, $4.2 million and
$1.7 million, respectively.
We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the
fair value of each option grant as of the date of grant.
Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of our
common stock. We estimate the expected life of the option using
historical data pertaining to option exercises and employee
terminations. Separate groups of employees that have similar
historical exercise behavior are considered separately for
estimating the expected life. The risk-free interest rate is
based on U.S. Treasury yields in effect at the time of
grant. The estimated weighted-average fair values of and related
assumptions for options granted were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Weighted-average fair value of options granted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At market value of underlying stock
|
|
$
|
4.33
|
|
|
$
|
4.49
|
|
|
$
|
3.91
|
|
At less than market value of underlying stock
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
10.73
|
|
Assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
3.49
|
%
|
|
|
3.82
|
%
|
|
|
3.61
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
35.76
|
%
|
|
|
35.62
|
%
|
|
|
32.33
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.80
|
%
|
|
|
3.70
|
%
|
|
|
2.53
|
%
|
Expected life of option (years)
|
|
|
6.53
|
|
|
|
7.94
|
|
|
|
5.37
|
|
At June 30, 2011, there were options outstanding to
purchase 9.8 million shares of Class A Common Stock.
79
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Stock
Awards
Stock awards are generally comprised of stock units that are
convertible into shares of Class A Common Stock. Generally,
these grants vest 25% per year over four years beginning the
first anniversary date of the award. Stock awards transactions
are summarized as follows (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Nonvested shares at June 30, 2008
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
$
|
25.14
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
944
|
|
|
|
19.48
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
25.26
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
23.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested shares at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
|
$
|
21.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
15.97
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(464
|
)
|
|
|
22.14
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
23.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested shares at June 30, 2010
|
|
|
1,371
|
|
|
$
|
18.47
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,003
|
|
|
|
17.52
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(555
|
)
|
|
|
20.08
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
15.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested shares at June 30, 2011
|
|
|
1,814
|
|
|
$
|
17.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2011, there was $39.0 million of total
unrecognized compensation cost related to the above nonvested
stock awards. We expect to recognize the cost of these stock
awards over a weighted-average period of 2.8 years. The
total fair value of shares vested during fiscal 2011, 2010 and
2009 was $11.2 million, $10.2 million and
$5.0 million, respectively.
Directors
Deferred Compensation Plan
Our non-employee directors are eligible to participate in a
deferred compensation plan under which they may elect on a
yearly basis to defer all or a portion of the following
years compensation. A participant may elect to have the
deferred amount (a) accrue interest during each calendar
quarter at a rate equal to the average six month Treasury Bill
rate in effect at the beginning of each calendar quarter, or
(b) credited as stock units whereby each unit
is equal to one share of Common Stock. The cumulative amount
that is deferred for each participating director is subject to
the claims of our general creditors.
If a non-employee director elects to have his or her
compensation deferred as stock units, the compensation earned
for a given quarter is converted to stock units at the closing
price of common stock on the date the compensation would
otherwise be paid. Stock units are distributed in shares of
common stock.
We are currently a party to various legal proceedings, claims
and investigations including those disclosed in this note. While
management presently believes that the ultimate outcome of these
proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will not
materially adversely impact our financial position or overall
trends in operations, legal proceedings are subject to inherent
uncertainties, and
80
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
unfavorable rulings or other events could occur. If unfavorable
final outcomes were to occur, then there exists the possibility
of a material adverse impact.
Employment and
Benefits Litigation
In 2009, a French subsidiary of Molex, Molex Automotive SARL,
decided to close a facility it operated in Villemur-sur-Tarn,
France. Molex Automotive SARL submitted a social plan to Molex
Automotive SARLs labor representatives providing for
payments to approximately 280 terminated employees. This social
plan was adopted by Molex Automotive SARL in 2009, which made
payments to those employees until September 2010. In September
2010, former employees of Molex Automotive SARL who were covered
under the social plan filed suit against Molex Automotive SARL
in the Toulouse Labor Court, requesting additional compensation
on the basis that their dismissal was not economically
justified. The total amount sought by the former employees of
Molex Automotive SARL is approximately 24 million
($34.8 million). Molex initiated liquidation of Molex
Automotive SARL, and pursuant to a court proceeding, a
liquidator was appointed in November 2010. One of the
liquidators responsibilities is to assess and respond to
the lawsuits involving Molex Automotive SARL. In June 2011,
Molex Incorporated received notice that it had been added as a
defendant in the Toulouse Labor Court proceedings and is
requested to attend a hearing on October 20, 2011. We
intend to vigorously contest the attempt by the former employees
to seek compensation from Molex Incorporated.
Molex Japan Co.,
Ltd
As we previously reported in our fiscal 2010 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
we launched an investigation into unauthorized activities at
Molex Japan Co., Ltd. in April 2010. We learned that an
individual working in Molex Japans finance group obtained
unauthorized loans from third party lenders, that included in at
least one instance the attempted unauthorized pledge of Molex
Japan facilities as security, in Molex Japans name that
were used to cover losses resulting from unauthorized trading,
including margin trading, in Molex Japans name. We also
learned that the individual misappropriated funds from Molex
Japans accounts to cover losses from unauthorized trading.
The individual admitted to forging documentation in arranging
and concealing the transactions. We retained outside legal
counsel, and they retained forensic accountants, to investigate
the matter. The investigation has been completed.
On August 31, 2010, Mizuho Bank (Mizuho), which holds the
unauthorized loans, filed a complaint in Tokyo District Court
requesting the court to find Molex Japan liable for the payment
of the outstanding unauthorized loans and to enter a judgment
for such payment. Mizuho is claiming payment of outstanding
principal borrowings of ¥3 billion
($37.2 million), ¥5 billion ($62.1 million),
¥5 billion ($62.1 million) and
¥2 billion ($24.8 million), other loan-related
expenses of approximately ¥106 million
($1.3 million) and interest and delay damages of
approximately ¥2.5 billion ($31.2 million) as of
June 30, 2011. On October 13, 2010, Molex Japan filed
a written answer requesting the court to dismiss the complaint,
Mizuho filed plaintiffs brief no. 1 on
December 15, 2010, Molex Japan filed defendants brief
no. 1 on February 16, 2011 and Mizuho filed
plaintiffs brief no. 2 on April 20, 2011. Molex
Japan filed defendants brief no. 2 on June 28,
2011 and the court instructed Mizuho to file a reply brief by
the end of August. We intend to vigorously contest the
enforceability of the outstanding unauthorized loans and any
attempt by the lender to obtain payment. See Note 3 for
accounting treatment of the accrual for unauthorized activities
in Japan.
As we reported on April 29, 2011, the Securities and
Exchange Commission informed us that the SEC has issued a formal
order of private investigation in connection with the activities
in Molex Japan Co., Ltd. We are fully cooperating with the
SECs investigation.
81
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
21.
|
Segment and
Related Information
|
We have two global product reportable segments: Connector and
Custom & Electrical. The reportable segments represent
an aggregation of three operating segments.
|
|
|
|
|
The Connector segment designs and manufactures products for
high-speed, high-density, high signal-integrity applications as
well as fine-pitch, low-profile connectors for the consumer and
commercial markets. It also designs and manufactures products
that withstand environments such as heat, cold, dust, dirt,
liquid and vibration for automotive and other transportation
applications.
|
|
|
|
The Custom & Electrical segment designs and
manufactures integrated and customizable electronic components
across all industries that provide original, differentiated
solutions to customer requirements. It also leverages expertise
in the use of signal, power and interface technology in
industrial automation and other harsh environment applications.
|
Information by segment for the years ended June 30 is summarized
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Custom &
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
Connector
|
|
Electrical
|
|
& Other
|
|
Total
|
|
2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue from external customers
|
|
$
|
2,600,469
|
|
|
$
|
985,120
|
|
|
$
|
1,745
|
|
|
$
|
3,587,334
|
|
Income (loss) from operations(1)
|
|
|
396,233
|
|
|
|
154,370
|
|
|
|
(120,404
|
)
|
|
|
430,199
|
|
Depreciation & amortization
|
|
|
197,173
|
|
|
|
28,607
|
|
|
|
16,391
|
|
|
|
242,171
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
225,608
|
|
|
|
24,065
|
|
|
|
12,573
|
|
|
|
262,246
|
|
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue from external customers
|
|
$
|
2,177,014
|
|
|
$
|
828,905
|
|
|
$
|
1,288
|
|
|
$
|
3,007,207
|
|
Income (loss) from operations(1)
|
|
|
123,980
|
|
|
|
111,083
|
|
|
|
(97,261
|
)
|
|
|
137,802
|
|
Depreciation & amortization
|
|
|
189,937
|
|
|
|
33,421
|
|
|
|
15,308
|
|
|
|
238,666
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
203,095
|
|
|
|
15,678
|
|
|
|
10,704
|
|
|
|
229,477
|
|
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,789,139
|
|
|
$
|
790,601
|
|
|
$
|
2,101
|
|
|
$
|
2,581,841
|
|
Income (loss) from operations(1)
|
|
|
(125,604
|
)
|
|
|
(152,443
|
)
|
|
|
(70,834
|
)
|
|
|
(348,881
|
)
|
Depreciation & amortization
|
|
|
201,303
|
|
|
|
33,283
|
|
|
|
17,316
|
|
|
|
251,902
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
144,176
|
|
|
|
18,613
|
|
|
|
15,154
|
|
|
|
177,943
|
|
82
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Operating results include the following charges (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Custom &
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
Connector
|
|
Electrical
|
|
& Other
|
|
Total
|
|
Fiscal 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unauthorized activities in Japan (Note 3)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,476
|
|
|
$
|
14,476
|
|
Fiscal 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs and asset impairments
|
|
$
|
100,273
|
|
|
$
|
12,234
|
|
|
$
|
4,398
|
|
|
$
|
116,905
|
|
Unauthorized activities in Japan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,898
|
|
|
|
26,898
|
|
Fiscal 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs and asset impairments
|
|
$
|
93,876
|
|
|
$
|
23,012
|
|
|
$
|
18,343
|
|
|
$
|
135,231
|
|
Goodwill impairments
|
|
|
93,140
|
|
|
|
171,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264,140
|
|
Intangible asset impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,300
|
|
Unauthorized activities in Japan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,685
|
|
|
|
2,685
|
|
Corporate & Other includes expenses primarily related
to corporate operations that are not allocated to segments such
as executive management, human resources, legal, finance and
information technology. We also include in Corporate &
Other the assets of certain plants that are not specific to a
particular division.
Customer net revenue and net property, plant and equipment by
significant countries are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Customer net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
849,521
|
|
|
$
|
568,839
|
|
|
$
|
535,079
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
563,496
|
|
|
|
541,126
|
|
|
|
444,043
|
|
China
|
|
|
1,133,561
|
|
|
|
833,759
|
|
|
|
613,743
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
202,291
|
|
|
$
|
271,018
|
|
|
$
|
274,840
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
288,498
|
|
|
|
264,477
|
|
|
|
272,753
|
|
China
|
|
|
301,672
|
|
|
|
274,642
|
|
|
|
233,487
|
|
Segment assets, which are comprised of accounts receivable,
inventory and fixed assets, are summarized as follows for the
years ended June 30 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Custom &
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
Connector
|
|
Electrical
|
|
& Other
|
|
Total
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
1,913,675
|
|
|
$
|
503,443
|
|
|
$
|
98,732
|
|
|
$
|
2,515,850
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
1,720,866
|
|
|
$
|
437,614
|
|
|
$
|
100,965
|
|
|
$
|
2,259,445
|
|
The reconciliation of segment assets to consolidated total
assets at June 30 follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
$
|
2,515,850
|
|
|
$
|
2,259,445
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
707,943
|
|
|
|
571,520
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
374,059
|
|
|
|
405,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total assets
|
|
$
|
3,597,852
|
|
|
$
|
3,236,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
Molex
Incorporated
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
22.
|
Quarterly
Financial Information
(Unaudited)
|
The following is a condensed summary of our unaudited quarterly
results of operations and quarterly earnings per share data for
fiscal 2011 (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
Second
|
|
Third
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
897,672
|
|
|
$
|
901,465
|
|
|
$
|
874,531
|
|
|
$
|
913,666
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
275,076
|
|
|
|
271,045
|
|
|
|
260,614
|
|
|
|
281,402
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
75,104
|
|
|
|
78,283
|
|
|
|
68,145
|
|
|
|
77,276
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
The following is a condensed summary of our unaudited quarterly
results of operations and quarterly earnings per share data for
fiscal 2010 (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
Second
|
|
Third
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
674,033
|
|
|
$
|
729,576
|
|
|
$
|
756,294
|
|
|
$
|
847,304
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
191,419
|
|
|
|
212,536
|
|
|
|
235,730
|
|
|
|
252,938
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(15,136
|
)
|
|
|
13,840
|
|
|
|
38,447
|
|
|
|
39,779
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share
|
|
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share
|
|
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
During fiscal 2010, we recognized restructuring expenses related
to our restructuring plan and asset impairment charges (see
Note 6). We did not recognize any restructuring expenses or
goodwill impairment charges in fiscal 2011. The table below
summarizes the impact on net income of these items on each of
the quarters during fiscal 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
Costs and
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
Impairments
|
|
Fiscal 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
38,547
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
22,154
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
7,440
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
24,694
|
|
84
The Board of
Directors and Stockholders of Molex Incorporated
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Molex Incorporated as of June 30, 2011 and 2010, and the
related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended June 30, 2011. Our audits also
included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index of
Part IV, Item 15. These financial statements and
schedule are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position of Molex Incorporated at
June 30, 2011 and 2010, and the consolidated results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended June 30, 2011, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our
opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken
as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of Molex Incorporateds internal control over
financial reporting as of June 30, 2011, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission and our report dated August [5], 2011
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Chicago, Illinois
August 5, 2011
85
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of
Directors and Stockholders of Molex Incorporated
We have audited Molex Incorporateds internal control over
financial reporting as of June 30, 2011, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Molex
Incorporateds management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting included in the accompanying
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Molex Incorporated maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of June 30, 2011, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Molex Incorporated as of
June 30, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
June 30, 2011 of Molex Incorporated and our report dated
August [5], 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Chicago, Illinois
August 5, 2011
86
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Attached as exhibits to this
Form 10-K
are certifications of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and
Chief Financial Officer (CFO), which are required in accordance
with
Rule 13a-14
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). This Controls and Procedures section
includes information concerning the controls and controls
evaluation referred to in the certifications. Immediately
preceding Part II, Item 9 of this
Form 10-K
is the report of Ernst & Young LLP, our independent
registered public accounting firm, regarding its audit of our
internal control over financial reporting and of
managements assessment of internal control over financial
reporting set forth below in this section. This section should
be read in conjunction with the certifications and the
Ernst & Young report for a more complete understanding
of the topics presented.
Evaluation of
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We conducted an evaluation (pursuant to
Rule 13a-15(b)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act)), under the supervision and with the participation of
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this
report.
These disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed in our reports that
are filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules
and forms. Our disclosure controls and procedures include,
without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure
that this information is accumulated and communicated to
management, including the principal executive and principal
financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Based on the evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls
and procedures were effective as of the end of the period
covered by this annual report.
Managements
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting
as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and as defined in
Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(f).
A control system can provide only reasonable, not absolute,
assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2011. Under
managements supervision, an evaluation of the design and
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
was conducted based on the framework in
Internal
Control Integrated Framework
issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our
internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
June 30, 2011.
Immediately preceding Part II, Item 9 of this
Form 10-K
is the report of Ernst & Young LLP, our independent
registered public accounting firm, regarding its audit of our
internal control over financial reporting and of
managements assessment of internal control over financial
reporting set forth below in this section. This section should
be read in conjunction with the certifications and the
Ernst & Young report for a more complete understanding
of the topics presented.
87
Changes in
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during our most recently completed
fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
Inherent
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including the CEO and CFO, do not expect that
our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial
reporting will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A
control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can
provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the
control systems objectives will be met. The design of a
control system must reflect the fact that there are resource
constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered
relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent
limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls
can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error
or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances
of fraud, if any, will be detected. These inherent limitations
include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be
faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or
mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual
acts of some persons, by intentionally falsified documentation,
by collusion of two or more individuals within Molex or third
parties, or by management override of the controls. The design
of any system of controls is based in part on certain
assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can
be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its
stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections
of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods
are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree
of compliance with policies or procedures.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable
to all employees, officers and directors. The Code of Business
Conduct incorporates our policies and guidelines designed to
deter wrongdoing and to promote honest and ethical conduct and
compliance with applicable laws and regulations. We have also
adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Management
applicable to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and other senior financial
managers. The Code of Ethics sets out our expectations that
financial management produce full, fair, accurate, timely and
understandable disclosure in our filings with the SEC and other
public communications. We intend to post any amendments to or
waivers from the Codes on our web site at www.molex.com.
The full text of each Code is published on the investor
relations page of our web site at www.molex.com.
The information under the captions Item 1
Election of Directors, Board Independence,
Board and Committee Information, Board
Leadership Structure, Corporate Governance
Principles, Risk Oversight and
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance in our 2011 Proxy Statement for the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders (2011 Proxy Statement) is
incorporated herein by reference. The information called for by
Item 401 of
Regulation S-K
relating to the Executive Officers is furnished in Part I,
Item 1 of this
Form 10-K
and is also incorporated herein by reference in this section.
88
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
The information under the captions Compensation Discussion
and Analysis, Compensation of Directors,
Report of the Compensation Committee and
Executive Compensation in our 2011 Proxy Statement
is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
The information under the captions Security Ownership of
Directors and Executive Officers and Security
Ownership of More than 5% Shareholders in our 2011 Proxy
Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
We currently maintain equity compensation plans that provide for
the issuance of Molex stock to directors, executive officers and
other employees. The following table sets forth information
regarding outstanding options and shares available for future
issuance under these plans as of June 30, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining available
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
for future issuance
|
|
|
Number of shares
|
|
Weighted-average
|
|
under equity
|
|
|
to be issued upon
|
|
exercise price
|
|
compensation plans
|
|
|
exercise of outstanding
|
|
of outstanding
|
|
(excluding shares
|
|
|
options
|
|
options
|
|
reflected in column (a))
|
|
|
Common
|
|
Class A
|
|
Common
|
|
Class A
|
|
Common
|
|
Class A
|
Plan Category
|
|
Stock
|
|
Stock
|
|
Stock
|
|
Stock
|
|
Stock
|
|
Stock
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,627,100
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,851,377
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
The information under the captions Corporate
Governance Board Independence, and
Transactions with Related Persons, in our 2011 Proxy
Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
The information under the captions Audit
Matters Independent Auditors Fees and
Audit Matters Policy on Audit Committee
Pre-Approval of Services in our 2011 Proxy Statement is
incorporated herein by reference.
89
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
1. Financial Statements: See Item 8.
2. Financial Statement Schedule: See
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.
All other schedules are omitted because they are inapplicable,
not required under the instructions, or the information is
included in the consolidated financial statements or notes
thereto.
Separate financial statements for the Companys
unconsolidated affiliated companies, accounted for by the equity
method, have been omitted because they do not constitute
significant subsidiaries.
3. Exhibits: Exhibits listed on the accompanying Index to
Exhibits are filed or incorporated herein as part of this annual
report on
Form 10-K.
90
Schedule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
End
|
|
|
|
of Period
|
|
|
to Income
|
|
|
Write-Offs
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
of Period
|
|
|
Receivable Reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
2,511
|
|
|
$
|
2,012
|
|
|
$
|
(889
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,634
|
|
Returns and customer rebates
|
|
|
41,139
|
|
|
|
81,170
|
|
|
|
(81,155
|
)
|
|
|
(2,491
|
)
|
|
|
38,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
43,650
|
|
|
$
|
83,182
|
|
|
$
|
(82,044
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,491
|
)
|
|
$
|
42,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
3,572
|
|
|
$
|
(654
|
)
|
|
$
|
(407
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,511
|
|
Returns and customer rebates
|
|
|
29,021
|
|
|
|
86,633
|
|
|
|
(75,602
|
)
|
|
|
1,087
|
|
|
|
41,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
32,593
|
|
|
$
|
85,979
|
|
|
$
|
(76,009
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,087
|
|
|
$
|
43,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
2,772
|
|
|
$
|
1,867
|
|
|
$
|
(1,067
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,572
|
|
Returns and customer rebates
|
|
|
37,471
|
|
|
|
81,829
|
|
|
|
(88,727
|
)
|
|
|
(1,552
|
)
|
|
|
29,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
40,243
|
|
|
$
|
83,696
|
|
|
$
|
(89,794
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,552
|
)
|
|
$
|
32,593
|
|
Inventory Reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slow and excess
|
|
$
|
35,019
|
|
|
$
|
17,700
|
|
|
$
|
(19,022
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,998
|
|
|
$
|
37,695
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
3,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
39,164
|
|
|
$
|
17,700
|
|
|
$
|
19,022
|
|
|
$
|
3,549
|
|
|
$
|
41,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slow and excess
|
|
$
|
38,181
|
|
|
$
|
8,697
|
|
|
$
|
(12,168
|
)
|
|
$
|
309
|
|
|
$
|
35,019
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,871
|
|
|
|
1,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
4,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
41,052
|
|
|
$
|
10,159
|
|
|
$
|
(12,168
|
)
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
39,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slow and excess
|
|
$
|
39,395
|
|
|
$
|
21,607
|
|
|
$
|
(21,492
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,329
|
)
|
|
$
|
38,181
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,407
|
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(444
|
)
|
|
|
2,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
42,802
|
|
|
$
|
21,515
|
|
|
$
|
(21,492
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,773
|
)
|
|
$
|
41,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended 2011
|
|
$
|
80,935
|
|
|
$
|
2,510
|
|
|
$
|
(9,572
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,015
|
)
|
|
$
|
71,858
|
|
Year ended 2010
|
|
$
|
77,399
|
|
|
$
|
14,443
|
|
|
$
|
(4,601
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,306
|
)
|
|
$
|
80,935
|
|
Year ended 2009
|
|
$
|
38,289
|
|
|
$
|
39,110
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
77,399
|
|
91
Molex
Incorporated
Index of
Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
Location
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation (as amended and restated)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our annual
report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended June 30, 2000. (File
No. 000-07491)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
By-laws (as amended and restated)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to our
Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2011. (File
No. 000-07491)
|
|
4
|
|
|
Instruments defining rights of security holders
|
|
See Exhibit 3.1
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Foreign Service Employees Policies and Procedures
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to our quarterly
report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2005. (File
No. 000-07491)
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Employment Offer Letter to David D. Johnson
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to our quarterly
report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2005. (File
No. 000-07491)
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Deferred Compensation Agreement between Molex and Frederick A.
Krehbiel
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to our quarterly
report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2005. (File
No. 000-07491)
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Deferred Compensation Agreement between Molex and John H.
Krehbiel, Jr.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to our quarterly
report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2005. (File
No. 000-07491)
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
2005 Molex Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended
and restated
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our quarterly
report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended December 31, 2010. (File
No. 000-07491)
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to our annual
report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended June 30, 2008. (File
No. 000-07491)
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Molex Outside Directors Deferred Compensation Plan
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to our
Form 8-K
filed on August 1, 2006. (File
No. 000-07491)
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
2000 Molex Long-Term Stock Plan, as amended and restated
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Appendix V to our 2007 Proxy
Statement. (File
No. 000-07491)
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 2000 Molex Long-Term
Stock Plan
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to our annual
report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended June 30, 2008. (File
No. 000-07491)
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the 2000 Molex
Long-Term Stock Plan
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to our annual
report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended June 30, 2008. (File
No. 000-07491)
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
2005 Molex Incentive Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Appendix VI to our 2007 Proxy
Statement. (File
No. 000-07491)
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 2005 Molex Incentive
Stock Option Plan
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to our
Form 10-K
for the period ended June 30, 2007.
(File No. 000-07491)
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Molex Incorporated Annual Incentive Plan
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Appendix III to our 2008 Proxy
Statement. (File
No. 000-07491)
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
2008 Molex Stock Incentive Plan, as amended
|
|
Filed herewith
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Separation Agreement between David B. Root and Molex
Incorporated dated April 6, 2009.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our
Form 8-K
filed on April 9, 2009. (File
No. 000-07491)
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Credit Agreement dated June 24, 2009 among Molex Incorporated,
the Lenders named therein, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. as
Administrative Agent, Standard Charter Bank as Syndication
Agent, The Northern Trust Company as Documentation Agent
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our
Form 8-K
filed on June 30, 2009. (File
No. 000-07491)
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
Location
|
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement dated June 24, 2009 among
Molex Incorporated, the Lenders named therein, J.P. Morgan
Chase Bank, N.A. as Administrative Agent, Standard Charter Bank
as Syndication Agent, The Northern Trust Company as
Documentation Agent
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to our quarterly
report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended December 31, 2009. (File
No. 000-07491)
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Waiver to Credit Agreement dated June 24, 2009 among Molex
Incorporated, the Lenders named therein, J.P. Morgan Chase
Bank, N.A. as Administrative Agent, Standard Charter Bank as
Syndication Agent, The Northern Trust Company as Documentation
Agent.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to our
Form 10-K
for the period ended June 30, 2010.
(File No. 000-07491).
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement dated March 25, 2011 among
Molex Incorporated, the Lenders named therein, J.P. Morgan
Chase Bank, N.A. as Administrative Agent, Standard Charter Bank
as Syndication Agent, The Northern Trust Company as
Documentation Agent.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 8-K filed
on March 30, 2011 (File No. 000-07491).
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to Credit Agreement dated June 28, 2011 among
Molex Incorporated, the Lenders named therein, J.P. Morgan
Chase Bank, N.A. as Administrative Agent, Standard Charter Bank
as Syndication Agent, The Northern Trust Company as
Documentation Agent. Filed herewith.
|
|
Filed herewith
|
|
21
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company
|
|
Filed herewith
|
|
23
|
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young, LLP
|
|
Filed herewith
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
Filed herewith
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
Filed herewith
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
Furnished herewith
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
Furnished herewith
|
|
101
|
.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
Furnished herewith
|
|
101
|
.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
Furnished herewith
|
|
101
|
.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
Furnished herewith
|
|
101
|
.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
Furnished herewith
|
|
101
|
.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
|
Furnished herewith
|
|
101
|
.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
|
Furnished herewith
|
(All other exhibits are either inapplicable or not required.)
93
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15
(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has
duly caused this Annual Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, there unto duly authorized.
MOLEX INCORPORATED
(Company)
David D. Johnson
Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
August 5, 2011
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 5, 2011
|
|
Co-Chairman of the Board
|
|
/s/
FREDERICK
A. KREHBIEL
Frederick
A. Krehbiel
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 5, 2011
|
|
Co-Chairman of the Board
|
|
/s/
JOHN
H. KREHBIEL, JR.
John
H. Krehbiel, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 5, 2011
|
|
Vice Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
/s/
MARTIN
P. SLARK
Martin
P. Slark
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 5, 2011
|
|
Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
/s/
DAVID
D. JOHNSON
David
D. Johnson
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 5, 2011
|
|
Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting
Officer)
|
|
/s/
K.
TRAVIS GEORGE
K.
Travis George
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 5, 2011
|
|
Director
|
|
/s/
FRED
L. KREHBIEL
Fred
L. Krehbiel
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 5, 2011
|
|
Director
|
|
/s/
MICHAEL
J. BIRCK
Michael
J. Birck
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 5, 2011
|
|
Director
|
|
/s/
MICHELLE
L. COLLINS
Michelle
L. Collins
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 5, 2011
|
|
Director
|
|
/s/
EDGAR
D. JANNOTTA
Edgar
D. Jannotta
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 5, 2011
|
|
Director
|
|
/s/
DAVID
L. LANDSITTEL
David
L. Landsittel
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 5, 2011
|
|
Director
|
|
/s/
JOE
W. LAYMON
Joe
W. Laymon
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 5, 2011
|
|
Director
|
|
/s/
DONALD
G. LUBIN
Donald
G. Lubin
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 5, 2011
|
|
Director
|
|
/s/
JAMES
S. METCALF
James
S. Metcalf
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 5, 2011
|
|
Director
|
|
/s/
ROBERT
J. POTTER
Robert
J. Potter
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 5, 2011
|
|
Director
|
|
/s/
ANIRUDH
DHEBAR
Anirudh
Dhebar
|
95
Molex Incorporated (MM) (NASDAQ:MOLX)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Jun 2024 bis Jul 2024
Molex Incorporated (MM) (NASDAQ:MOLX)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Jul 2023 bis Jul 2024