Notes to the Financial Statements
NOTE 1. NATURE OF BUSINESS
Strata Oil & Gas Inc. (the ‘Company’)
is currently engaged in the acquisition, exploration and if warranted feasible development of heavy oil projects in the Peace River
oil sands region in Northern Alberta, Canada. The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on November 18,
1998 and commenced operations in January 1999. The Company completed its initial public offering in February 2000.
The Company is presently incorporated under
the Canada Business Corporations Act.
As of December 31, 2016, the Company had interests
in 62 leases covering 60,672 hectares in the Peace River oil sands region.
NOTE 2. ABILITY TO CONTINUE AS
A GOING CONCERN
As shown in the accompanying financial statements,
the Company has not realized any revenue from its present operations. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company incurred
a net loss of $7,332,474 and had negative cash flows from operations of $18,024 and is expected to incur further negative operating
cash flows in the foreseeable future. The Company has an accumulated deficit of $23,525,737 at December 31, 2016. These conditions
raise substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements have been
prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the ordinary course
of business.
The Company's ability to continue as a going
concern is dependent on its ability to develop its oil and gas properties and ultimately achieve profitable operations and to
generate sufficient cash flow from financing and operations to meet its obligations as they become payable. The Company expects
that it will need approximately $525,000 to fund its operations during the next twelve months which will include minimum annual
property lease payments, expected exploration expenditures for permitting and drilling, as well as operating expenses. Management
has plans to seek additional capital through a private placement and public offering of its common stock. Although there are no
assurances that management’s plans will be realized, management believes that the Company will be able obtain sufficient
capital to continue operations in the next 12 months. Accordingly, no adjustment relating to the recoverability and classification
of recorded asset amounts and the classification of liabilities has been made to the accompanying financial statements in anticipation
of the Company not being able to continue as a going concern.
NOTE 3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The financial statements have been prepared
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) and pursuant
to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
Management’s Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities
as of the balance sheet date, and revenues and expenses for the period then ended. Actual results could differ significantly from
those estimates.
Oil and Gas Property Payments and Exploration
Costs
The Company follows the full cost method of
accounting for natural gas and oil operations. Under the full cost method all costs incurred in the acquisition, exploration and
development of natural gas and oil interests are initially capitalized into cost centers on a country-by-country basis. The Company’s
current cost center is located in Canada. Such costs include land acquisition costs, geological and geophysical expenditures, carrying
charges on non-producing properties, costs of drilling and overhead charges directly related to acquisition, exploration and development
activities.
Costs capitalized, together with the costs
of production equipment, are depleted and amortized on the unit-of-production method based on the estimated net proved reserves,
as determined by independent petroleum engineers. The accounting standards require that the average, first-day-of-the-month price
during the 12-month period before the end of the year rather than the year-end price, must be used when estimating whether reserve
quantities are economical to produce. This same 12-month average price is also used in calculating the aggregate amount of (and
changes in) future cash inflows related to the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows. Costs of acquiring and
evaluating unproved properties are initially excluded from depletion calculations. These unproved properties are assessed periodically
to ascertain whether impairment has occurred. When proved reserves are assigned or the property is considered to be impaired, the
cost of the property or the amount of the impairment is added to costs subject to depletion calculations.
Under full cost accounting rules, capitalized
costs, less accumulated amortization and related deferred income taxes, shall not exceed an amount (the ceiling) equal to the sum
of: (i) the after tax present value of estimated future net revenues computed by applying current prices of oil and gas reserves
to estimated future production of proved oil and gas reserves as of the date of the latest balance sheet presented, less estimated
future expenditures (based on currents costs) to be incurred in developing and producing any proved reserves computed using a discount
factor of ten percent and assuming continuation of existing economic conditions; (ii) the cost of properties not being amortized;
and (iii) the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproved properties included in the costs being amortized. If unamortized
costs capitalized within a cost center, less related deferred income taxes, exceed the ceiling, the excess shall be charged to
expense and separately disclosed during the period in which the excess occurs. Amounts thus required to be written off shall not
be reinstated for any subsequent increase in the cost center ceiling.
On an annual basis management evaluates the
carrying value of the Company’s leases and associated assets and assesses them for impairment, considering historical experience
and other data such as primary lease terms of the properties, average holding period of unproved properties, geographic and geologic
data, and also the commodity price forecast. As of December 31, 2016, the Company decided to fully impair certain of its assets
primarily relating to unproved leases and legacy wells for a total impairment of $7,831,570. As of December 31, 2015, no impairment
was recognized.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid
investments purchased with a maturity of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains cash and cash equivalent
balances with financial institutions that may exceed federally insured limits. There were no cash equivalent balances for the
years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 or 2014.
GST Receivables
Goods and Services Tax (GST) receivables
are presented net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Receivables consist of goods and services input tax credits. The allowance
for doubtful accounts on GST receivables was $nil at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
In accordance with ASC 360,
Property, Plant
and Equipment,
long lived assets such as equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured
by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the
asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount
by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented
in the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount of fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated.
The assets and liabilities of a disposed group classified as held for sale would be presented separately in the appropriate asset
and liability sections of the balance sheet.
Asset Retirement Obligations
In accordance with ASC 410,
Asset Retirement
and Environmental Obligations,
the fair value of an asset retirement cost, and corresponding liability, should be recorded
as part of the cost of the related long-lived asset and subsequently allocated to expense using a systematic and rational method.
The Company has recorded an asset retirement obligation at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 (Note 7) to reflect its legal obligations
related to future abandonment of its oil and gas interests using estimated expected cash flow associated with the obligation and
discounting the amount using a credit-adjusted, risk-free interest rate. At least annually, the Company will reassess the obligation
to determine whether a change in any estimated obligation is necessary. The Company will evaluate whether there are indicators
that suggest the estimated cash flows underlying the obligation have materially changed. Should those indicators suggest the estimated
obligation has materially changed the Company will accordingly update its assessment. The liability accretes until the Company
settles the obligation.
Income Taxes
The Company follows the asset and liability
method of accounting for income taxes whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
of differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.
If it is determined that the realization of the future tax benefit is not more likely than not, the Company establishes a valuation
allowance.
Foreign Exchange Translation
The Company's functional currency is the Canadian
dollar, but reports its financial statements in US dollars. The Company translates its Canadian dollar balances to US dollars in
the following manner: Assets and liabilities have been translated using the rate of exchange at the balance sheet date. Equity
transactions have been translated at historical rates. The Company’s results of operations have been translated using the
average daily exchange rate for the fiscal year. Translation gains or losses resulting from the changes in the exchange rates are
accumulated as other comprehensive income or loss in a separate component of stockholders' equity.
All amounts included in the accompanying financial
statements and footnotes are stated in U.S. dollars.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company reviews the terms of its equity
instruments and other financing arrangements to determine whether there are embedded derivative instruments that are required to
be accounted for separately as a derivative financial instrument. Also, in connection with the issuance of financing instruments,
the Company has issued freestanding warrants that are accounted for as derivative instrument liabilities because they are exercisable
in a currency other than the functional currency of the Company and thus do not meet the “fixed-for-fixed” criteria
of ASC 815-40-15. The warrants are exercisable in United States dollars and the Company’s functional currency is the Canadian
dollar.
Derivative financial instruments are initially
measured at their fair value. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument
is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported as
charges or credits to income. For option and warrant-based derivative financial instruments, the Company uses the Black-Scholes
option pricing model to value the derivative instruments.
Any exercise or cancellation of an equity instrument
which meets the classification of a derivative financial instrument is trued-up to fair value at that date and the fair value of
the exercised instrument is then re-classed from liability to additional paid in capital.
The classification of derivative instruments,
including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is reassessed at the end of each reporting period.
If reclassification is required, the fair value of the derivative instrument, as of the determination date, is reclassified. Any
previous charges or credits to income for changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument are not reversed. Derivative instrument
liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative
instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.
Stock Options
The Company measures all employee stock-based
compensation awards using a fair value method on the date of grant and recognizes such expense in its consolidated financial statements
over the requisite service period. The Company uses the Black-Scholes pricing model to determine the fair value of stock-based
compensation awards on the date of grant. The Black-Scholes pricing model requires management to make assumptions regarding option
lives, expected volatility, and risk free interest rates.
The Company accounts for non-employee stock-based
awards in accordance with the provision of ASC 505, “Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees” (“ASC 505”),
which requires that such equity instruments are recorded at their fair value on the measurement date. The measurement of stock-based
compensation is subject to periodic adjustment as the underlying equity instruments vest. The Company uses the Black-Scholes pricing
model to determine the fair value of stock-based compensation awards. The Black-Scholes pricing model requires management to make
assumptions regarding option lives, expected volatility, and risk free interest rates.
The Company uses historical data to estimate
option exercise, forfeiture and employee termination within the valuation model. For non-employees, the expected term of the options
approximates the full term of the options. The risk-free interest rate is based on a treasury instrument whose term is consistent
with the expected term of the stock options. The Company has not paid and does not anticipate paying dividends on its common stock;
therefore, the expected dividend yield is assumed to be zero. In addition, accounting standard requires companies to utilize an
estimated forfeiture rate when calculating the expense for the reporting period. Based on its best estimate, management applied
the estimated forfeiture rate of nil in determining the expense recorded in the accompanying Statements of Operations and Comprehensive
Income (Loss).
Expected volatilities are calculated using
the historical volatility of the Company’s stock. When applicable, the Company will use historical data to estimate option
exercise, forfeiture and employees’ termination within the valuation model. For non-employees, the expected term of the options
approximates the full term of the options.
Earnings (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock
Basic earnings (loss) per share of common stock
is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
for the period. Diluted earnings per share of common stock reflect the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other
contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that
then shared in the earnings of the Company. Dilutive potential common shares are calculated in accordance with the treasury stock
method, which assumes that proceeds from the exercise of all warrants and options are used to repurchase common stock at market
value. The amount of shares remaining after the proceeds are exhausted represents the potentially dilutive effect of the securities.
See Note 10 “Earnings Per Share” for further details.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The book values of GST receivables, notes receivable,
accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their respective fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
The fair value hierarchy under GAAP distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and an entity’s
own assumptions (unobservable inputs). The hierarchy consists of three levels:
·
|
Level one
- Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
|
·
|
Level two
- Inputs other than level one inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable; and
|
·
|
Level three
- Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumptions, which are developed by the reporting entity and reflect those assumptions that a market participant would use.
|
Determining which category
an asset or liability falls within the hierarchy requires significant judgment. We evaluate our hierarchy disclosures each balance
sheet date. Liabilities measured at fair value are summarized as follows as of:
|
|
Fair Value Measurement at
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurement at
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurement at
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
$
|
779,796
|
|
|
$
|
779,796
|
|
|
$
|
1,153,491
|
|
|
$
|
1,153,491
|
|
|
$
|
4,482,296
|
|
|
$
|
4,482,296
|
|
The Company measures and reports the fair value
liability for warrants with a strike price currency different than the functional currency of the Company on a recurring basis.
The fair value liabilities for warrants have been recorded as determined utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model. A slight
change in an unobservable input like historical volatility could have a significant impact on the fair value measurement of the
derivative liabilities. See Note 5 “Derivative Liabilities” for further discussion of the inputs used in determining
the fair value.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) is defined to include
all changes in equity except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. The Company's items of other
comprehensive income (loss) are foreign currency translation adjustments.
Related Party Transactions
A related party is generally defined as (i)
any person who holds 10% or more of the Company’s securities and their immediate families, (ii) the Company’s management,
(iii) someone who directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the Company, or (iv) anyone
who can significantly influence the financial and operating decisions of the Company. A transaction is considered to be a related
party transaction when there is a transfer of resources or obligations between related parties.
New Accounting Pronouncements
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements
are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) that are adopted by the Company as of the specified
effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, management believes that the impact of recently issued standards did not or will not
have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02,
Amendments
to the Consolidation Analysis
, which makes changes to both the variable interest model and the voting model, affecting all
reporting entities involved with limited partnerships or similar entities, particularly industries such as the oil and gas, transportation
and real estate sectors. In addition to reducing the number of consolidation models from four to two, the guidance simplifies and
improves current guidance by placing more emphasis on risk of loss when determining a controlling financial interest and reducing
the frequency of the application of related-party guidance when determining a controlling financial interest in a VIE. The requirements
of the guidance are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within
that reporting period, with early adoption permitted. We adopted this guidance on January 1, 2016. The adoption of this guidance
did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15,
Presentation of Financial Statements Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) - Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability
to Continue as a Going Concern. Currently, there is no guidance in U.S. GAAP about management’s responsibility to evaluate
whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern or to provide related footnote
disclosures. The amendments in this update provide that guidance. The amendments are intended to reduce diversity in the timing
and content of footnote disclosures. The amendments require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going
concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the
amendments (1) provide a definition of the term “substantial doubt,” (2) require an evaluation every reporting period,
including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require
certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require
an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period
of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments in this update
are effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted this guidance
during the year ended December 31, 2016. Refer to Note 2 “Ability to Continue as a Going Concern” for further information.
In November 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17,” Balance
Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes”. ASU No. 2015-17 requires that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified
as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. ASU No. 2015-17 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted this ASU No.
on January 1, 2016 and its adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No.
2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. Under ASU No. 2016-09,
companies will no longer record excess tax benefits and certain tax deficiencies in additional paid-in capital (“APIC”).
Instead, they will record all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement
and the APIC pools will be eliminated. In addition, ASU No. 2016-09 eliminates the requirement that excess tax benefits be realized
before companies can recognize them. ASU No. 2016-09 also requires companies to present excess tax benefits as an operating activity
on the statement of cash flows rather than as a financing activity. Furthermore, ASU No. 2016-09 will increase the amount an employer
can withhold to cover income taxes on awards and still qualify for the exception to liability classification for shares used to
satisfy the employer’s statutory income tax withholding obligation. An employer with a statutory income tax withholding obligation
will now be allowed to withhold shares with a fair value up to the amount of taxes owed using the maximum statutory tax rate in
the employee’s applicable jurisdiction(s). ASU No. 2016-09 requires a Company to classify the cash paid to a tax authority
when shares are withheld to satisfy its statutory income tax withholding obligation as a financing activity on the statement of
cash flows. Under current U.S. GAAP, it was not specified how these cash flows should be classified. In addition, companies will
now have to elect whether to account for forfeitures on share-based payments by (1) recognizing forfeitures of awards as they occur
or (2) estimating the number of awards expected to be forfeited and adjusting the estimate when it is likely to change, as is currently
required. The amendments of this ASU are effective for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted
but all of the guidance must be adopted in the same period. The Company adopted this on January 1, 2016. The Company has evaluated
the impact of ASU No. 2016-09 and has determined that the adoption of the impact of forfeitures, net of income taxes, will not
have a material impact on the Company’s future financial statements.
In February 2017,
the FASB has issued ASU No. 2017-05,
Other Income – Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets
(Subtopic 610-20)
. This amendment clarifies that nonfinancial assets within the scope of Subtopic 610-20 may include nonfinancial
assets transferred within a legal entity to a counterparty. For example, a parent may transfer control of nonfinancial assets by
transferring ownership interests in a consolidated subsidiary. A contract that includes the transfer of ownership interests in
one or more consolidated subsidiaries is within the scope of Subtopic 610-20 if substantially all of the fair value of the assets
that are promised to the counterparty in a contract is concentrated in nonfinancial assets. The amendment clarifies that an entity
should identify each distinct nonfinancial asset or in substance nonfinancial asset promised to a counterparty and derecognize
each asset when a counterparty obtains control of it.
This is effective for
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period.
We
do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In August 2016,
the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15 which addresses how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the
statement of cash flows with the objective of reducing existing differences in the presentation of these items. The amendments
in ASU No. 2016-15 are to be adopted retrospectively and will become effective in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. The Company
is evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on its consolidated statement of cash flows. We do not expect the adoption of
this standard to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In November 2016,
the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18 which require that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total
of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. As a result, amounts
generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling
the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The amendments do not provide a definition
of restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods after December
15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments should be applied using a retrospective transition method
to each period presented. The Company is evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on its consolidated statement of cash
flows.
There are no other recently issued accounting
pronouncements that are expected to have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
NOTE 4. NOTES RECEIVABLE, RELATED
PARTIES
During the period December 27, 2013 through
February 22, 2016, the Company entered into several unsecured short-term note receivable agreements totaling $123,213 (C$165,432),
principal plus interest, with a related party through common directors. The notes receivable included an option agreement with
the borrower for development rights on a portfolio of oil sands leases in Alberta. If the option agreement were exercised, the
outstanding balances payable under the note receivable would be applied towards option payments.
During the period December 27, 2013 through
June 30, 2015, the Company entered into several unsecured short-term note receivable agreements totally $52,677 (C$70,726)), principal
plus interest, with a second borrower who was also a related party through common directors. The notes receivable included an option
agreement with the borrowers for development rights on a portfolio of oil sands leases in Alberta. If the option agreement were
exercised, the outstanding balances payable under the note receivable would be applied towards option payments. As of June 25,
2015, the related party relationship ceased to exist as the common director step-down. During the period June 30, 2015 through
February 22, 2016, the Company entered into additional unsecured short-term note receivable agreements with this borrower totally
$78,303 (C$105,133). Total notes receivable from this borrower were $130,980 (C$175,859).
All note receivable agreements bore interest
at the Bank of Canada prime rate plus 1%. The borrower could repay the entire loan including outstanding interest at any time by
advising the Company of the intent to pay fifteen days prior to the anticipated date of retirement. All notes receivable included
an option agreement with the borrowers for development rights on a portfolio of oil sands leases in Alberta. If the option agreement
were exercised, the outstanding balances payable under the note receivable would be applied towards option payments.
On February 22, 2016, the Company and the borrowers
entered into a purchase and sale agreement whereby the Company elected to acquire all the rights and obligations associated with
certain oilsands leases. As part of the purchase price, the notes receivable were applied towards the payment for the lease rights.
Accordingly, the notes receivable plus accrued interest were $nil as of December 31, 2016. See Note 6 “Oil Properties”
for additional discussion of the lease acquisitions.
For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015,
the Company advanced $15,987 (C$19,000) and $20,315 (C$38,500), respectively, under the short-term note agreements with the related
party. The Company recognized $502 (C$835) and $4,217 (C$5,428) in accrued interest income for the years ended December 31, 2016
and 2015, under the terms of the note agreements with the related party.
For the years ended December 31, 2016
and 2015, the Company advanced $26,706 (C$38,800) and $30,353 (C$63,700), respectively, under the short-term note agreements.
The Company recognized $651 (C$874), $2,581 (C$3,322) and $231 in accrued interest income for the years ended December 31, 2016,
2015 and 2014, under the terms of the note agreements.
NOTE 5. DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES
Derivative liabilities consist of common stock
warrants with an exercise price in a different currency than the Company’s functional currency and they are accounted for
as separate liabilities measured at their respective fair values as follows:
Balance, December 31, 2013
|
|
$
|
5,178,906
|
|
Fair value of warrants issued in private placements
|
|
|
301,600
|
|
Exercise of warrants – reclassification to additional paid-in-capital
|
|
|
(110,049
|
)
|
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities
|
|
|
(466,499
|
)
|
Foreign exchange effect on derivative liability
|
|
|
(421,032
|
)
|
Balance, December 31, 2014
|
|
$
|
4,482,926
|
|
Fair value of warrants issued in private placements reclassified from equity
|
|
|
191,490
|
|
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities
|
|
|
(3,006,205
|
)
|
Foreign exchange effect on derivative liability
|
|
|
(514,720
|
)
|
Balance, December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
1,153,491
|
|
Fair value of warrants issued in private placements reclassified from equity
|
|
|
169,700
|
|
Fair value of warrants issued in private placements recognized as derivative expense
|
|
|
59,064
|
|
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities
|
|
|
(643,944
|
)
|
Foreign exchange effect on derivative liability
|
|
|
41,485
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
779,796
|
|
The fair value of the derivative liabilities
has been determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following range of assumptions:
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Volatility
|
|
254.90%
|
|
202.10%
|
|
1.01 to 1.79%
|
Expected life
|
|
.2 to 7 years
|
|
1 to 8 years
|
|
1 to 8 years
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
0.74% - 1.4%
|
|
.048 % to 1.36%
|
|
147.1%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
0.00%
|
|
0.00%
|
|
0.00%
|
NOTE 6. OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES
Peace River Properties
During the period June 2006 through January
2007, the Company acquired the rights to multiple oilsands property leases with the Province of Alberta in the Peace River area
of Alberta, Canada (the “Peace River Properties”). All the leases were acquired through a public auction process that
requires the Company to submit sealed bids for land packages being auctioned by the provincial government. Upon being notified
that it has submitted the highest bid for a specific land parcel the Company immediately pays the government the bid price and
enters into a formal lease with the provincial government. All the leases are for a 15-year term, require minimum annual lease
payments, and grant the Company the right to explore and develop oil sands on the respective lease. The specific transactions entered
into by the Company are as noted below.
On February 22, 2016, the Company entered
into two purchase / sale agreements acquiring a total of 45 leases, representing 39,680 hectares (98,051 acres) in the Peace River
area of Alberta. One of the purchase / sale agreements was with a related party. The Company paid for the acquisition of these
leases by the issuance of restricted 3,997,431 shares of its common stock valued at $0.217 per share reduced by the carrying value
of notes receivable, including accrued interest, from the two parties. As of February 22, 2016, the total notes receivable, plus
accrued interest, was $271,380 and the value of the share issuance was $867,433 resulting in a net purchase price of $1,138,823.
All the Company’s leases in the Peace
River area are subject to royalties payable to the government of Alberta. The royalty is calculated using a revenue-less-cost formula.
In years prior to the recovery of the project’s capital investment, the royalty is 1% of gross revenue. Once the project
costs have been recovered, the royalty is the greater of 1% of gross revenue or 25% of net revenue.
The table below summarizes all lease properties
of the Company as of the year ended December 31, 2016:
|
|
Number of
|
|
Land Area
|
|
Annual Lease Payments
|
Acquisition Year
|
|
Leases
|
|
(Hectares)
|
|
CDN
|
|
|
|
USD
|
2005
|
|
6
|
|
9,152
|
|
32,032
|
|
/
|
|
$23,857
|
2006
|
|
29
|
|
35,328
|
|
123,585
|
|
/
|
|
$92,046
|
2007
|
|
21
|
|
13,312
|
|
46,592
|
|
/
|
|
$34,702
|
2008
|
|
5
|
|
1,280
|
|
4,480
|
|
/
|
|
$3,337
|
2011
|
|
1
|
|
1,600
|
|
5,600
|
|
/
|
|
$4,171
|
|
|
62
|
|
60,672
|
|
212,289
|
|
/
|
|
$158,113
|
The Company completed drilling four exploratory
wells during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 for a total cost of $2,796,637. Since 2007, the Company has performed several
studies on the area and has developed a drilling program. The Company intends to move forward on the drilling program when adequate
funding is available. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company did not drill any exploratory wells. As of December
31, 2016, the Company decided to fully impair all of its unproved properties for a total impairment of $7,831,570. This decision
was made due to: the historically low commodity prices; the general lack of investment activity in the sector; the general lack
of new oil sands lease activity in the region; and the need to update our 51-101 studies to reflect the new COGEH standards. As
of the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company had oil and gas property balance of $nil and $6,237,026 and $7,423,966,
respectively.
The following table sets forth the Company’s
future minimum lease payments for the years ending December 31:
Year
|
|
Future
Minimum Lease Payments
|
|
2017
|
|
$
|
212,289
|
|
2018
|
|
|
212,289
|
|
2019
|
|
|
212,289
|
|
2020
|
|
|
212,289
|
|
2021
|
|
|
180,257
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
83,552
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,112,965
|
|
NOTE 7. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
During 2007, the Company drilled four wells
on its Peace River Properties. Total future asset retirement obligations were estimated by management based on the Company’s
working interest in its wells and facilities, estimated costs to remediate, reclaim and abandon the wells and facilities and the
estimated timing of the costs to be incurred in future periods. The Company has estimated the net present value of its total asset
retirement obligations to be approximately $138,724 and $128,301 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, based on an undiscounted
total future liability of $218,226 (CDN$293,000). These payments are expected to be incurred between 2020 and 2030. The Company
used a credit adjusted discount rate of 10% per annum and an inflation rate of 2% to calculate the present value of the asset
retirement obligation. Accretion expense of $6,559, $13,622 and $10,545 during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014,
respectively, has been recorded in the Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. The table below summarizes activity within
our asset retirement obligation account.
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Asset retirement obligations at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
128,301
|
|
|
$
|
138,049
|
|
Accretion expense
|
|
|
6,566
|
|
|
|
13,622
|
|
Liabilities incurred
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Change in estimated obligations
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Asset retirement obligations at end of year
|
|
|
134,867
|
|
|
|
151,671
|
|
Less: current retirement obligations
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Change due to foreign exchange
|
|
|
3,861
|
|
|
|
(23,370
|
)
|
Long-term retirement obligations
|
|
$
|
138,728
|
|
|
$
|
128,301
|
|
NOTE 8. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Related party transactions not disclosed elsewhere
in these financial statements include:
Notes payable to related party
In December 2015, the Company borrowed $13,835
($19,000 Canadian) under two separate note agreements for $7,282 ($10,000 Canadian) and $6,553 ($9,000 Canadian) with related parties.
The lenders are related parties through an immediate family relationship with officers or directors of the Company and a common
director. The $7,282 loan from the immediate family relationship was repaid in its entirety at December 31, 2015.
The notes payable bear interest at the Bank
of Canada Prime rate plus 1%. The Company may repay the loan and outstanding interest thereon by giving notice to the lender 15
days prior to the anticipated repayment. At December 31, 2016, the effective interest rate on these notes payable was 3.7%. The
balance of notes payable to related parties at December 31, 2016 was $6,963. The Company recognized interest expense of $264 and
$nil for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, in its Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
Consulting fees
Mr. Daems did not bill the Company for
his services as President; however, a related party by common director has a service agreement with the Company to assist with
identification, acquisition and service of certain exploration style properties that fit the parameters of the Company’s
acquisition plan. The Company recognized an expense of $45,032 in 2014 as consulting fees under the agreement.
Mr. Newton is the President and a member
of the Board of Directors of the Company. Mr. Newton does not bill the Company for his services as President; however, he has
a service agreement with the Company. Pursuant to this agreement, the Company capitalized oil and gas exploration costs and an
accrued liability of $75,240 as of December 31, 2016. The Company recognized $16,001 as consulting fees during the year ended
December 31, 2015. The Company and Mr. Newton agreed to issue stock in lieu of cash for the amount of $75,240 by issuing
restricted common stock of the Company. As of the date of this filing, the Company has yet to issue total shares of 234,950 to
settle this liability.
Mr. Michael Ranger is a member of the Board
of Directors of the Company. Mr. Ranger does not receive compensation for his services as a member of the board; however, he has
a service agreement with the Company. Pursuant to this agreement, the Company capitalized oil and gas exploration costs and an
accrued liability of $12,662 and $nil during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company and Mr.
Ranger agreed to issue stock in lieu of cash for a portion of this services billed in the amount of $7,448. As of the date of
this filing, the Company has yet to issue total shares of 23,258 to settle this liability.
NOTE 9. SHARE CAPITAL
Pursuant to its articles of incorporation, the Company has an
unlimited number of common stock shares available for issuance with no par value. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had 14,215,016
shares of common stock outstanding.
During the year ended December 31, 2016,
the Company closed a series of private placements for a total of 623,167 units at $0.30 to $0.50 per unit for total offering proceeds
of $138,000 and the payment of a subscription payable for cash received in 2015 of $21,514. Each unit consisted of one share of
common stock for the Company and one Class A Warrant exercisable for one share of common stock at an exercise price of $0.20 to
$0.50 for a period of five years from the date of placement. Warrants vest on the one year anniversary date.
On October 17, 2016, the Company closed
a private placement with the President of the Company, totaling 45,000 units for total proceeds of $9,000. Each unit consisted
of one share of common stock for the Company and one Class A Warrant exercisable for one share of common stock at an exercise price
of $0.30 for a period of five years from the date of placement. Warrants vest on the one year anniversary date.
During the year ended December 31, 2016,
the Company closed two private placements totaling 380,000 shares of common stock at $0.20 per common stock share for total proceeds
of $76,000. A related party, a Company with common directors, participated in the transactions.
Refer to Note 6 Oil and Gas Properties
for common stock shares issued for the acquisition of oil properties.
For the year ended December 31, 2015, 65,250
common share warrants were exercised at exercise prices of $0.90 to $1.50 for total proceeds of $69,600. Upon exercise, the fair
value of these liability instruments of $110,049 was re-classified from liability to additional paid in capital.
During the year ended December 31, 2015
the Company closed a series of private placements totaling 23,110 units at $0.90 to $1.00 per unit for total offering proceeds
of $219,990. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock of the Company and one Class A Warrant exercisable for one share
of common stock at an exercise price of $1.50 for a period of five years from the date of placement.
During the year ended December 31, 2014
the Company closed a series of private placements totaling 300,218 units at $0.90 to $1.20 per unit for total offering proceeds
of $301,600. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock of the Company and one Class A Warrant exercisable for one share
of common stock at an exercise price of $1.40 to $1.80 for a period of five years from the date of placement.
The Company classified the entire proceeds
of $301,600 from these private placements as a derivative liability related to the warrants.
For the year ended December 31, 2014, 65,250
common share warrants were exercised at exercise prices of $0.90 to $1.50 for total proceeds of $69,600. Upon exercise, the fair
value of these liability instruments of $110,049 was re-classified from liability to additional paid in capital. See Note 5.
The following table summarizes the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes
models to estimate the grant date fair value of the warrants:
The following table summarizes warrant activity
during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
|
|
Number of
Warrants
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Warrants
Exercisable
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Outstanding December 31, 2014
|
|
|
3,634,697
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
3,334,479
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
231,100
|
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Canceled / exercised
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Outstanding December 31, 2015
|
|
|
3,865,797
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
3,509,697
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
668,166
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Canceled / exercised
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Outstanding December 31, 2016
|
|
|
4,533,963
|
|
|
$
|
1.70
|
|
|
|
3,865,797
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
The following tables summarizes outstanding warrants as of December
31, 2016:
|
|
Warrants Outstanding
|
|
Range of Exercise Price
|
|
Number of
Warrants
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Remaining
Contractual
Life
(yrs)
|
|
$0.03 - $0.010
|
|
|
1,320,933
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
$0.11 - $0.15
|
|
|
1,338,209
|
|
|
$
|
1.30
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
$0.15 - $0.20
|
|
|
1,199,392
|
|
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
$0.21 - $0.30
|
|
|
56,291
|
|
|
$
|
2.80
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
$0.31 - $0.50
|
|
|
62,737
|
|
|
$
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
$2.50 - $2.55
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
21.90
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
4,533,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company classified proceeds on December
31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 of $169,700, $191,490 and $301,600, respectively, from the private placements of common stock plus warrants
as a derivative liability.
NOTE 10. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic income per common share is computed by
dividing income available to the Company’s common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
during the period. Diluted income per common share reflects the potential dilution that could occur from common share issuable
through stock options and warrants. Diluted income per common share is computed similarly to basic income per common stock except
that weighted average common stock is increased to include the potential issuance of dilutive common stock.
The following table sets forth the basic
and diluted net income per share computed for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014:
|
|
For the years ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(7,332,474
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,753,593
|
|
|
$
|
(283,101
|
)
|
Less: Non-cash income from changes in fair value of derivative liabilities
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(133,395
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss - diluted
|
|
$
|
(7,332,474
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,620,198
|
|
|
$
|
(283,101
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic
|
|
|
13,035,203
|
|
|
|
9,115,416
|
|
|
|
8,719,125
|
|
Common stock options
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
4,444
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Common stock warrants - liability treatment
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
41,666
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted
|
|
|
13,035,203
|
|
|
|
9,161,527
|
|
|
|
8,719,125
|
|
Net income per share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.56
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(0.56
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
The weighted average number of shares outstanding
used in the computation of the basic and diluted net income per share does not include the effect of the following potential outstanding
shares of common stock. The effects of these potentially outstanding shares were not included in the calculation of basic and diluted
net income per share for 2016 because the effect would have been anti-dilutive.
|
|
For the years ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Common stock options
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
347,000
|
|
|
|
477,000
|
|
Common stock warrants - liability treatment
|
|
|
4,533,963
|
|
|
|
3,740,797
|
|
|
|
3,634,697
|
|
Potentially dilutive securities
|
|
|
4,533,963
|
|
|
|
4,087,797
|
|
|
|
4,111,697
|
|
NOTE
11. STOCK OPTION PLANS
Approval of the 2016 Stock Plan
In November 2016, the Board of Directors
approved and the Company adopted the 2016 Stock Option Plan (“the 2016 Plan”). The 2016 Plan provides for the granting
of up to 1,200,000 stock options to key employees, directors and consultants, of common shares of the Company. Under the 2016
Plan, the granting of incentive and non-qualified stock options, exercise prices and terms are determined by the Company's Option
Committee, a committee designated to administer the 2016 Plan by the Board of Directors. For incentive options, the exercise price
shall not be less than the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the grant date. (In the case of options granted
to an employee who owns stock possessing more than 10% of the voting power of all classes of the Company's stock on the date of
grant, the option price must not be less than 110% of the fair market value of common stock on the grant date.) Options granted
are not to exceed terms beyond ten years (five years in the case of an incentive stock option granted to a holder of 10 percent
of the Company's common stock).
As of December 31, 2016, there were 1,200,000 shares available
for grant.
2006 Stock Option Plan
In June 2006 the stockholders approved
and the Company adopted its 2006 Stock Option Plan (“the 2006 Plan”). The 2006 Plan provides for the granting of up
to 800,000 stock options to key employees, directors and consultants, of common shares of the Company. Under the 2006 Plan, the
granting of incentive and non-qualified stock options, exercise prices and terms are determined by the Company's Option Committee,
a committee designated to administer the 2006 Plan by the Board of Directors. For incentive options, the exercise price shall
not be less than the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the grant date. (In the case of options granted to an
employee who owns stock possessing more than 10% of the voting power of all classes of the Company's stock on the date of grant,
the option price must not be less than 110% of the fair market value of common stock on the grant date.) Options granted are not
to exceed terms beyond ten years (five years in the case of an incentive stock option granted to a holder of 10 percent of the
Company's common stock).
In June 2016, the 2006 Plan expired so that
no common stock options may be issued under this Plan.
Stock Option Activity
There were no stock options granted during the years ended
December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
Activity under the 2016 and 2006 Plan is summarized as follows:
|
|
Number of
Stock Options
Outstanding
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
(Years)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2013
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
7.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
Granted
|
|
377,000
|
|
|
|
1.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2014
|
|
|
477,000
|
|
|
|
2.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Option granted
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options cancelled
|
|
|
(110,000
|
)
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2015
|
|
|
367,000
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Option granted
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options cancelled
|
|
|
(20,000
|
)
|
|
|
22.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2016
|
|
|
347,000
|
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
5.08
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
347,000
|
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
5.08
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
The following table summarizes information concerning outstanding
and exercisable common stock options under the 2006 and 2016 Plans at December 31, 2016:
|
|
Options Outstanding and Exercisable
|
|
Range of Exercise Price
|
|
Number of
Options
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Remaining
Contractual
Life
(yrs)
|
|
$0.70- $1.20
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
$
|
.70
|
|
|
|
5.53
|
|
$1.30 -$1.50
|
|
|
289,500
|
|
|
$
|
1.40
|
|
|
|
6.71
|
|
$1.60 - $4.00
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
|
|
3.92
|
|
$4.10 - $7.50
|
|
|
32,500
|
|
|
$
|
6.50
|
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
347,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no unvested common stock options
under the 2016 or 2006 Plan at December 31, 2016.
As of December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, there was no unrecognized
compensation cost related to all options granted and outstanding.
During the year ended December 31, 2015, the
Company recorded consulting fees of $41,845 in the statement of operations related to stock options granted to non-employees.
The Company issues new shares when options are exercised.
NOTE 12. INCOME
TAXES
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to the Company’s
deferred tax assets are as follows:
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
661,000
|
|
|
$
|
627,200
|
|
|
$
|
956,000
|
|
Capital losses
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
Office equipment
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
Oil & Gas properties
|
|
|
2,222,000
|
|
|
|
1,691,000
|
|
|
|
2,133,900
|
|
Asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
83,300
|
|
|
|
76,700
|
|
|
|
63,000
|
|
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
2,983,800
|
|
|
|
2,412,400
|
|
|
|
3,170,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less valuation allowance
|
|
|
(2,983,800
|
)
|
|
|
(2,412,400
|
)
|
|
|
(3,170,400
|
)
|
Deferred tax asset recognized
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
Upon continuation to Canada in 2004, all losses carried forward
at that time expired. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had available to offset future taxable income a net Canadian operating
loss carry-forwards of approximately $2.7 million. The carry-forwards began expiring in 2014 and unless utilized will continue
to expire. The Company also has approximately $8.9 million in Canadian oil and gas dedication pools that can be used to offset
income of future periods. The amount of oil and gas dedication pools available for deduction in any year may be limited to 30%
of the amount available.
The Company evaluates its valuation allowance
requirements based on projected future operations. When circumstances change and this causes a change in management's judgment
about the recoverability of deferred tax assets, the impact of the change on the valuation allowance is reflected in current income.
During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, changes in valuation allowance were $571,400, ($758,000) and ($25,700),
respectively.
The (benefit) provision for income taxes differs
from the amount of income tax determined by applying the applicable Canadian statutory federal income tax rate to pre-tax income
loss as a result of the following differences:
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Statutory federal income tax rate
|
|
|
-25%
|
|
|
|
-25%
|
|
|
|
-25%
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
19%
|
|
|
|
-24%
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
%Non-deductible stock-based compensation
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
-1%
|
|
|
|
-149%
|
|
Non%-deductible change in fair value of derivative liability
|
|
|
-117%
|
|
|
|
107%
|
|
|
|
165%
|
|
Non-deductible accretion expense
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
|
4%
|
|
|
|
4%
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange
|
|
|
122%
|
|
|
|
-61%
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
Effect of change in income tax rate
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
The Company has evaluated its tax positions
for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 and determined that it has no uncertain tax positions requiring financial
statement recognition.
Under ASC 740-10-25, the impact of an uncertain
income tax position on income tax expense must be recognized at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained.
An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has 50% or less likelihood of being sustained.
We accrue interest and penalties on our
uncertain tax positions as a component of our provision for income taxes. There was no amount of interest and penalties recognized
as an expense during 2016, 2015 and 2014.
Our income tax returns are generally considered
closed to examination when we file a notice of determination with the taxing authority. No such notice has been filed to date.
NOTE 13. COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
Environmental Matters
The Company is engaged in oil and gas exploration
and may become subject to certain liabilities as they relate to environmental cleanup of sites or other environmental restoration
procedures as they relate to the exploration of oil and gas. Should it be determined that a liability exists with respect to any
environmental clean up or restoration, the liability to cure such a violation could fall upon the Company. No claim has been made,
nor is the Company aware of any liability, which it may have, as it relates to any environmental clean-up, restoration or the violation
of any rules or regulations relating thereto. Liabilities for expenditures are recorded when environmental assessment and/or remediation
is probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated.
NOTE 14. SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
For the nine months ended September 30,
2017, the Company received proceeds of $126,052 from private placements totaling 880,260 common shares issued to a related party
by common director.
For the nine months ended September 30,
2017, the Company issued 258,208 common shares as stock in-lieu of cash to directors of the Company for services provided during
the year ended December 31, 2016.
On May 5, 2017, the Company sold one of
its impaired legacy wells for total proceeds of $40,112 (CDN$55,000).
On June 16, 2017, the Company appointed
Dave Mahowich as Director.
On July 18, 2017, the Company affected
a reverse stock split of the Company’s Common Stock at a reverse split ratio of 1-for-10, pursuant to a plan approved by
the Company’s Board of Directors. The reverse stock split was declared effective by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
(“FINRA”) on December 1, 2017. All shares throughout these financial statements have been retroactively adjusted to
reflect the reverse stock split.
On November 12, 2017, the Company granted
stock options to purchase up to 340,000 shares of common stock to four individuals. The options vested upon issuance, have a price
of $0.05 and expire on November 12, 2027.