UNITED STATES
|
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
|
Washington, D.C. 20549
|
SCHEDULE 14A
|
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
|
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.
)
|
Filed by the
Registrant
x
|
|
Filed by a Party other than the
Registrant
o
|
Check the appropriate box:
|
[ ]
|
Preliminary Proxy
Statement
|
[ ]
|
Confidential, for Use of
the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
[ X ]
|
Definitive Proxy
Statement
|
[ ]
|
Definitive Additional
Materials
|
[ ]
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant
to §240.14a-12
|
NorthWestern Corporation
|
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
|
|
|
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the
Registrant)
|
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the
appropriate box):
|
x
|
No fee required.
|
o
|
Fee computed on table below per
Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
|
(1)
|
Title of each class of securities to
which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Aggregate number of securities to
which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Per unit price or other underlying
value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth
the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined):
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of
transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
Total fee paid:
|
|
|
|
o
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary
materials.
|
o
|
Check box if any part of the fee is
offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing
for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous
filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the
date of its filing.
|
|
(1)
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Form, Schedule or Registration
Statement No.:
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Filing Party:
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Date Filed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
Notice
of Annual Meeting
and
Proxy Statement
NorthWestern Corporation
d/b/a NorthWestern Energy
3010 W. 69
th
Street
Sioux Falls, SD 57108
www.northwesternenergy.com
April 15,
2008
Dear
Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the 2008 annual meeting of stockholders
to be held at the New York Marriott Downtown Hotel, 85 West Street, New York, N.Y., on
Wednesday, May 21, 2008, at 10:00 a.m. local time.
At the meeting, stockholders will be voting on the election of directors and
the ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm for 2008. The proxy
statement included with this letter provides you with information about the annual meeting
and the business to be conducted.
Your vote is very important
. Please consider
the issues presented and vote your shares as promptly as possible by following the
instructions on your proxy card. If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm,
bank or other nominee, please follow the instructions you receive from them to vote your
shares.
Thank you for your continued support of NorthWestern Corporation.
Very truly
yours,
Michael J.
Hanson
President
and Chief Executive Officer
NorthWestern Corporation
d/b/a
NorthWestern Energy
3010
W. 69
th
Street, Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57108
Notice
of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
May
21, 2008
To Our
Stockholders:
The 2008 annual meeting of stockholders of NorthWestern Corporation will be
held on
May 21,
2008, beginning at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time at the New York Marriott Downtown
Hotel, 85 West Street, New York, N.Y.
The purpose of the annual meeting is to consider and vote upon the following
matters:
|
1.
|
Election of seven (7) members to our Board of Directors to
hold office until the annual meeting of stockholders in 2009 and until
their successors are duly elected and qualified;
|
|
2.
|
Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP
as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending
December 31, 2008; and
|
|
3.
|
Transaction of any other business as may properly come
before the annual meeting and any adjournment or postponement of the annual
meeting.
|
The above business matters are described in detail in the accompanying proxy
statement.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” each of the
director nominees and the ratification of the independent registered public accounting
firm.
The record date for determining the stockholders entitled to receive notice
of and to attend and vote at the annual meeting and any adjournments or postponements of
the annual meeting is March 28, 2008. This notice and proxy statement, voting instructions
and NorthWestern’s Annual Report are being mailed to stockholders on or about April
15, 2008.
The annual meeting is open to stockholders and those guests invited by us.
The admission ticket enclosed with this proxy statement will be required for admittance to
the meeting. If you wish to attend the annual meeting and your shares are held in an
account at a brokerage firm, bank or other nominee (i.e., in “street name”),
you will need to bring a copy of your brokerage statement or other documentation reflecting
your stock ownership as of the record date. Additional information about attendance at the
annual meeting is located in the Annual Meeting Guidelines on the last page of this proxy
statement.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Thomas J.
Knapp
Vice
President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
April 15,
2008
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the
Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on May 21, 2008: The proxy statement and annual report to
stockholders are available on the Internet at
http://www.northwesternenergy.com/2008Proxy.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
This proxy
statement contains information related to the solicitation of proxies by the Board of
Directors (the “Board”) of NorthWestern Corporation
(“NorthWestern,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,”
or “our”) in connection with the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on
Wednesday, May 21, 2008, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time at the New York Marriott
Downtown Hotel, 85 West Street, New York, N.Y.
ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
Q:
|
When and where is the annual meeting?
|
A:
|
The annual meeting of our stockholders will be held on
Wednesday, May 21, 2008, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time at the New
York Marriott Downtown Hotel, 85 West Street, New York, N.Y.
|
Q:
|
Are the proxy materials available
electronically?
|
The proxy statement, annual report and voting instructions will be available
for one year on the Company’s Web site at
http://www.northwesternenergy.com/2008proxy
.
Q:
|
Will the annual meeting be webcast?
|
The annual meeting will be webcast (audio and slides) simultaneously with
the live meeting. You may access the webcast from our Web site at
http://www.northwesternenergy.com
. A replay of
the webcast also will be available on our Web site through June 21, 2008.
Q:
|
What matters will be voted on at the annual
meeting?
|
A:
|
The following matters will be voted on at the annual
meeting:
|
|
•
|
Election of seven (7) directors to serve on our
Board;
|
|
•
|
Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP
as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2008;
and
|
|
•
|
Transaction of any other matters and business as may
properly come before the annual meeting or any postponement or adjournment
of the annual meeting.
|
Q:
|
Who can vote and attend the annual
meeting?
|
A:
|
All stockholders of record as of the close of business on
March 28, 2008, are entitled to receive notice of and to attend and vote at
the annual meeting, or any postponement or adjournment of the annual
meeting. If you wish to attend the annual meeting and your shares are held
in an account at a brokerage firm, bank or other nominee (i.e., in
“street name”), you will need to bring a copy of your brokerage
statement or other documentation reflecting your stock ownership as of the
record date. “Street name” holders who wish to vote at the
annual meeting will need to obtain a proxy authorizing them to vote at the
annual meeting from the broker, bank or other nominee that holds their
shares.
|
Q:
|
What is a quorum of stockholders?
|
A:
|
A quorum is necessary to hold a valid annual meeting. A
quorum will be present at the annual meeting if the holders of a majority
of the shares of our common stock outstanding and entitled to vote on the
record date are present in person or represented by proxy. If a quorum is
not present at the annual meeting, we expect that the annual meeting will
be adjourned to solicit additional proxies. Abstentions and “broker
non-votes” count as present for establishing a quorum for the
transaction of all business. Since there were 38,972,551 shares of
common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the annual
meeting as of the record date, the presence of holders of
19,486,276 shares, in person or by proxy, will constitute a
quorum.
|
1
Q:
|
What vote is required for each proposal at the annual
meeting?
|
A:
|
The election of directors requires a plurality of the votes
cast by the shares of common stock present in person or represented by
proxy at the annual meeting. “Plurality” means that the
nominees receiving the largest number of votes cast “FOR” are
elected as directors up to the maximum number of directors to be chosen at
the meeting. A properly executed proxy marked “WITHHOLD
AUTHORITY” with respect to the election of one or more directors will
not be voted with respect to the director or directors indicated, although
it will be counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum.
Stockholders do not have the right to cumulate their votes for directors.
In August 2006, the Board adopted a Majority Vote Policy for the election
of directors. The policy provides that, in an uncontested election, any
nominee for director who receives a greater number of “WITHHOLD
AUTHORITY” votes from his or her election than votes
“FOR” such election (a “Majority Withheld Vote”)
shall promptly tender his or her resignation following certification of the
shareholder vote under the procedures in the Policy. The Majority Vote
Policy is explained in detail on page 7.
|
The ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our
independent registered public accounting firm for 2008 requires the affirmative vote of a
majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the annual meeting and
entitled to vote thereon.
Q:
|
How does our Board recommend that I vote?
|
A:
|
Our Board recommends that you vote:
|
|
•
|
“FOR” the election of each of the nominees for
director; and
|
|
•
|
“FOR” ratification of the appointment of
Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting
firm for 2008.
|
Q:
|
What methods may I use to cast my vote?
|
A:
|
Internet and Telephone
Voting
.
Holders
of record may vote by using the Internet or telephone. Instructions for
voting can be found on the enclosed voting card. If you hold your shares
through a broker, bank or other nominee, you should check your voting
instruction card forwarded by your broker, bank or other nominee to see
which voting options are available.
|
Voting by Mail.
Holders of record may
vote by completing, signing, dating and mailing the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed
postage-paid envelope. If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank or
other nominee, please follow the instructions you receive from them to vote your
shares.
Voting in Person at the Annual Meeting.
Submitting your vote by proxy will not affect your right to attend the
annual meeting and to vote in person. If you attend the annual meeting and wish to vote in
person, you will be given a ballot at the annual meeting. Please note, however, that if
your shares are held in “street name” by a broker, bank or other nominee and
you wish to vote at the annual meeting, you must bring to the annual meeting a proxy from
the recordholder of the shares authorizing you to vote at the annual meeting.
We do not expect that any other matters will be brought before the annual
meeting; however, by giving your proxy, you appoint the persons named as proxies as your
representatives at the annual meeting. If an issue should arise for vote at the annual
meeting that is not included in the proxy material, the proxy holders will vote your shares
in accordance with their best judgment.
Read and follow the instructions on your proxy or voting instruction card
carefully.
2
Q:
|
How are votes counted?
|
A:
|
For the election of directors, you may vote
“FOR” all of the nominees or you may “WITHHOLD
AUTHORITY” for one or more of the nominees. Withheld votes will not
count as votes cast for the nominee, but will count for the purpose of
determining whether a quorum is present. As a result, if you withhold your
vote, it has no effect on the outcome of the vote to elect directors;
however, under our Majority Vote Policy, if a nominee for director receives
more “WITHHOLD AUTHORITY” votes than “FOR” votes,
such nominee shall immediately tender his/her resignation under the
procedures in the Policy.
|
For the proposal relating to ratification of our independent registered
public accounting firm, you may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or
“ABSTAIN.” The failure to vote, either by not returning a properly executed
proxy card or not voting in person at the annual meeting, will have no effect on the
outcome of the voting on the ratification proposal. However, abstentions will have the same
effect as voting “AGAINST” ratification of our independent registered public
accounting firm.
If you sign your proxy card without indicating your vote, your shares will
be voted “FOR” each of the nominees for director, “FOR”
ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting
firm and in accordance with the recommendations of our Board on any other matters properly
brought before the annual meeting for a vote.
Q:
|
What is a “broker non-vote”?
|
A:
|
A “broker non-vote” generally occurs when a
broker, bank or other nominee holding shares in “street name”
on your behalf does not vote on a proposal because the broker, bank or
other nominee has not received your voting instructions and lacks
discretionary power to vote the shares. Generally, brokers, banks and other
nominees have the discretion to vote for directors and the ratification of
the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm,
unless you instruct otherwise. “Broker non-votes” will be
treated as shares that are present and entitled to vote for the purpose of
determining whether a quorum exists.
|
Q:
|
Can I change my vote after I have delivered my
proxy?
|
A:
|
Yes. If you are a recordholder of our common stock, you can
change your vote at any time before your proxy is voted at the annual
meeting by properly delivering prior to the annual meeting a later-dated
proxy or attending the annual meeting and voting in person. You also may
revoke your proxy by delivering a notice of revocation to our corporate
secretary prior to the vote at the annual meeting. If your shares are held
in “street name,” you must contact your broker, bank or other
nominee to revoke your proxy.
|
Q:
|
What should I do if I receive more than one set of voting
materials?
|
A:
|
You may receive more than one set of voting materials,
including multiple copies of this proxy statement and multiple proxy or
voting instruction cards. For example, if you hold your shares in more than
one brokerage account, you will receive a separate voting instruction card
for each brokerage account in which you hold shares. If you are a holder of
record and your shares are registered in more than one name, you will
receive more than one proxy card. Please vote each proxy and voting
instruction card that you receive.
|
Q:
|
Who pays for the solicitation of proxies?
|
A:
|
NorthWestern will pay the cost of the solicitation, which
will be made primarily by mail. Proxies also may be solicited in person, by
telephone, facsimile or similar means, by our directors, officers or
employees without additional compensation.
|
We will, on request, reimburse stockholders who are brokers, banks or other
nominees for their reasonable expenses in sending proxy materials and annual reports to the
beneficial owners of the shares they hold of record.
3
PROPOSAL
1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
In accordance with our current certificate of incorporation and our current
bylaws, all members of our Board are elected annually, to serve until the next annual
meeting of stockholders. Our bylaws currently authorize a Board consisting of not fewer
than five nor more than eleven persons. Our Board has determined that, with the exception
of Michael J. Hanson, all of the director nominees are independent as defined by the NASDAQ
Marketplace Rules.
The nominees for election to the seven positions on our Board, selected by
our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board and proposed by our Board to
be voted upon at the annual meeting, are Stephen P. Adik, E. Linn Draper, Jr., Jon S.
Fossel, Michael J. Hanson, Julia L. Johnson, Philip L. Maslowe and D. Louis
Peoples.
Unless authority to vote for the election of directors has been specifically
withheld, the persons named in the accompanying proxy intend to vote “FOR” the
election of director nominees Adik, Draper, Fossel, Hanson, Johnson, Maslowe and Peoples to
hold office as directors until the next annual meeting of stockholders in 2009 and until
their successors are elected and qualified. All nominees have advised the Board that they
are able and willing to serve as directors.
If any nominee becomes unavailable for any reason (which is not
anticipated), the shares represented by the proxies may be voted for such other person or
persons as may be determined by the holders of the proxies (unless a proxy contains
instructions to the contrary). In no event will the proxy be voted for more than seven
nominees. Directors will be elected by a favorable vote of a plurality of the shares of
voting stock present and entitled to vote, in person or by proxy, at the annual meeting.
Accordingly, abstentions or “broker non-votes” as to the election of directors
will not affect the election of the candidates receiving the plurality of votes; however,
under our Majority Vote Policy, if a nominee for director receives more “WITHHOLD
AUTHORITY” votes than “FOR” votes, such nominee shall immediately tender
his/her resignation under the procedures in the Policy. Unless instructed to the contrary
in the proxy, the shares represented by the proxies will be voted “FOR” the
election of the seven nominees named above as directors.
Nominees
Stephen
P. Adik
, age 65, director since November 1, 2004, is the retired
Vice Chairman (2001-2003) of NiSource Inc. (NYSE: NI), an electric and natural gas
production, transmission and distribution company; formerly Senior Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer (1998-2001), and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer (1996-1998), of NiSource. Mr. Adik serves on the Boards of Beacon Power (NASDAQ:
BCON), a designer and manufacturer of power conversion and sustainable energy storage
systems for the distributed generation, renewable energy, and backup power markets; the
Chicago SouthShore and South Bend Railroad, a regional rail carrier serving northwest
Indiana; and Dearborn Midwest Conveyor Company, a manufacturer and installer of conveyor
equipment for the bulk materials and automotive industries.
E. Linn
Draper, Jr.
, age 66, Chairman of the Board since November 1,
2004, is the retired Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of American Electric
Power Company (NYSE: AEP), a public utility holding company (1992-2004), Mr. Draper serves
on the Boards of Alliance Data Systems Corporation (NYSE: ADS), a provider of transaction
services, credit services and marketing services; Alpha Natural Resources Inc. (NYSE: ANR),
a coal producer; Temple-Inland Inc. (NYSE: TIN), a corrugated packing and forest products
business; and TransCanada (NYSE: TRP) transporter and marketer of natural gas and generator
of electric power in Canada and the United States.
4
Jon S.
Fossel
, age 66, director since November 1, 2004, is the
retired Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Oppenheimer Management
Corporation, a mutual fund investment company (“Oppenheimer”) (1989-1996). Mr.
Fossel serves as nonexecutive chairman of the Board of UnumProvident Corporation (NYSE:
UNM), a disability and life insurance provider.
Michael
J. Hanson
, age 49, director since May 20, 2005; is President and
Chief Executive Officer since May 20, 2005; formerly President since March 2005; Chief
Operating Officer since August 2003; formerly President and Chief Executive Officer of
NorthWestern’s utility operations (1998-2003). Prior to joining NorthWestern, Mr.
Hanson was General Manager and Chief Executive of Northern States Power Company of South
Dakota and North Dakota in Sioux Falls, S.D. (1994-1998). Mr. Hanson serves on the Board of
a NorthWestern subsidiary.
Julia
L. Johnson
, age 45, director since November 1, 2004, is
President of NetCommunications, LLC, a strategy consulting firm specializing in the energy,
telecommunications and information technology public policy arenas, since 2000; formerly
Sr. Vice President-Communications & Marketing for Military Commercial Technologies,
Inc. (MILCOM). Ms. Johnson served as Commission Chairman (1997-1999) and Commissioner
(1992-1997) for the Florida Public Service Commission. Ms. Johnson serves on the Boards of
Allegheny Energy Inc. (NYSE: AYE), an electric utility holding company; and MasTec, Inc.
(NYSE: MTZ), a leading end-to-end voice, video, data and energy infrastructure solution
provider.
Philip
L. Maslowe
, age 61, director since November 1, 2004, was
formerly Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (1997-2002) of The Wackenhut
Corporation, a security, staffing and privatized prisons corporation; formerly Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (1993-1997) of Kindercare Learning Centers, a
provider of learning programs for preschoolers. Mr. Maslowe serves on the Board of Delek US
Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: DK), a diversified energy business focused on petroleum refining and
supply and retail marketing.
D.
Louis Peoples
, age 67, director since January 14, 2006, is
the retired Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman of the Board of Orange and Rockland
Utilities, Inc. (1994-1999). Mr. Peoples serves on the Boards of the Center for Clean Air
Policy and the Nevada Area Council, Boy Scouts of America and is a sponsor of and active
participant in the Aspen Institute Forum on Energy, the Environment and the
Economy.
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR”
THE
ELECTION OF THESE SEVEN NOMINEES.
5
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF COMMON
STOCK
Except under special circumstances, our common stock is the only class of
voting securities. The number of shares noted are those beneficially owned, as determined
under the rules of the SEC, and such information is not necessarily indicative of
beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes
any shares as to which a person has sole or shared voting power or investment power and any
shares which the person has the right to acquire within 60 days through the exercise of
option, warrant or right.
Holdings of Major Stockholders
The following table sets forth information regarding whom we know to be the
beneficial owners of more than 5 percent of our issued and outstanding common stock. Such
information is based on a review of statements filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (“SEC”) pursuant to Sections 13(d), 13(f) and 13(g) of the
Exchange Act.
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned
|
|
Percent of Common Stock
|
Zimmer Lucas Partners LLC
|
|
3,691,853
|
|
9.5%
|
45 Broadway, 28
th
New York, NY 10006
|
|
|
|
|
RS Investment Management Co. LLC
|
|
2,624,945
|
|
6.7%
|
388 Market Street, Suite 1700
San Francisco, CA 94111
|
|
|
|
|
King Street Capital Management LLC
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
5.1%
|
65 East 55
th
Street, 30
th
Floor
New York, NY 10022
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings of Directors and Officers
The following table set forth certain information as of April 1, 2008, with
respect to the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock owned by the nominees for
director, the Named Executive Officers, and by all of our directors and executive officers
as a group.
|
|
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
|
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Unrestricted Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned
|
|
Unvested Restricted Stock
|
|
Deferred Stock Units
|
|
Total Shares of Common Stock Beneficially
Owned
|
|
Percent of Common Stock
|
Stephen P. Adik
|
|
–
|
|
6,666
|
|
14,037
|
|
20,703
|
|
*
|
E. Linn Draper, Jr.
|
|
–
|
|
6,666
|
|
28,028
|
|
34,694
|
|
*
|
Jon S. Fossel
|
|
6,334
|
|
6,666
|
|
–
|
|
13,000
|
|
*
|
Michael J. Hanson
|
|
31,955
|
|
25,655
|
|
–
|
|
57,610
|
|
*
|
Julia L. Johnson
|
|
–
|
|
6,666
|
|
19,858
|
|
26,524
|
|
*
|
Philip L. Maslowe
|
|
–
|
|
6,666
|
|
20,997
|
|
27,663
|
|
*
|
D. Louis Peoples.
|
|
3,000
|
|
6,666
|
|
8,002
|
|
17,668
|
|
*
|
Brian B. Bird
|
|
16,880
|
|
12,060
|
|
–
|
|
28,940
|
|
*
|
Thomas J. Knapp
|
|
4,197
|
|
8,736
|
|
–
|
|
12,933
|
|
*
|
Curt T. Pohl
|
|
3,492
|
|
5,823
|
|
–
|
|
9,315
|
|
*
|
Gregory G. A. Trandem
|
|
2,040
|
|
6,780
|
|
–
|
|
8,820
|
|
*
|
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (15
persons)
|
|
77,326
|
|
115,732
|
|
90,922
|
|
283,980
|
|
*
|
* Less than 1%.
6
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
Our Board oversees the business of NorthWestern. It establishes overall
policies and standards for us and reviews the performance of our management. In addition,
our Board presently has an Audit Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
and a Human Resources Committee whose functions are briefly described below.
Our Board has adopted a policy, in which attendance and participation by
directors is considered during the Board’s self-evaluation, in determining continued
service on the Board. The Board held 16 regular and special meetings in 2007. Each
current director attended more than 75 percent of the aggregate of the meetings of the
Board and of each committee on which he/she served. At our last annual meeting of
stockholders in August 2007, all of the seven directors then serving were in attendance at
the meeting.
Executive sessions without management in attendance are provided for at each
regularly scheduled Board meeting and are chaired by our non-executive Chairman of the
Board.
Determination of
Independence
A majority of NorthWestern’s directors are required to be independent
in accordance with the criteria set forth in NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 4200(a)(15) and
IM-4200. As a part of its independence assessment, the Board considers whether any
non-employee director or member of his or her immediately family has a material
relationship with the Company that would impair the director’s independence. The
Board’s determination of independence is based upon a review of the questionnaires
submitted by each director, the Company’s relevant business records, publicly
available information and the applicable SEC and NASDAQ requirements.
Based on its review, the Board determined that Messrs. Adik, Draper, Fossel,
Maslowe, Peoples and Ms. Johnson, being all of the non-employee directors, are independent
as defined by the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules.
Director Majority Vote
Policy
In August 2006, the Board adopted a Majority Vote Policy for the election of
directors. The policy provides that, in an uncontested election, any nominee for director
who receives a greater number of “WITHHOLD AUTHORITY” votes from his or her
election than votes “FOR” such election (a “Majority Withheld
Vote”) shall promptly tender his or her resignation following certification of the
shareholder vote.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee shall promptly consider
the resignation offer, and a range of possible responses based on the circumstances that
led to the Majority Withheld Vote, if known, and make a recommendation to the Board. The
Board will act on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation
within 90 days following certification of the shareholder vote. Thereafter, the Board will
promptly disclose its decision-making process and decision regarding whether to accept the
director’s resignation offer (or the reason(s) for rejecting the resignation offer,
if applicable) in a Form 8-K furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Any director who tenders his or her resignation pursuant to this provision
shall not participate in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommendation
or Board action regarding whether to accept the resignation offer. However, if each member
of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee received a Majority Withheld Vote at
the same election, then the independent directors who did not receive a Majority Withheld
Vote shall appoint a committee amongst themselves to consider the resignation offers and
recommend to the Board whether to accept them. If the only directors who did not receive a
Majority Withheld Vote in the same election constitute three or fewer directors, all
directors may participate in the action regarding whether to accept the resignation offers,
with each director recusing himself/herself from consideration of his/her resignation
offer.
7
Code of
Conduct
Our Board adopted our revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
(“Code of Conduct”) on August 7, 2007, and reviews it annually. Our Code of
Conduct sets forth standards of conduct for all of our officers, directors and employees
and those of our subsidiary companies, including all full- and part-time employees and
certain persons that provide services on our behalf, such as agents. Our Code of Conduct is
available on our Web site at
http://www.northwesternenergy.com
. We intend to
post on our Web site any amendments to, or waivers from, our Code of Conduct. In addition,
on August 26, 2003, our former Board adopted a code of ethics that applies to our
principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or
controller, or persons performing similar functions, which provides for a complaint
procedure that specifically applies to this code. This code of ethics along with the
complaint procedures are also reviewed annually and are available on our Web
site.
Committees of the
Board
Audit Committee
Our Audit Committee provides oversight of (i) the financial reporting
process, the system of internal controls and the audit process of NorthWestern, and (ii)
our independent auditor. Our Audit Committee also recommends to the Board the appointment
of our independent registered public accounting firm. As required by the Audit Committee
Charter, each of the members of our Audit Committee is an independent director as defined
by NASD Rule 4200(a)(15).
Our Audit Committee is composed of four non-employee directors who are
financially literate in financial and auditing matters and are “independent” as
defined by the SEC. The members of the Audit Committee are Chairman Stephen P. Adik, Jon S.
Fossel, Philip L. Maslowe and D. Louis Peoples. Audit Committee Chairman Adik has been
identified as the Audit Committee’s financial expert, as defined in Item 401(h)(2) of
Regulation S-K. Our Audit Committee held nine meetings during 2007.
Human Resources Committee
Our Human Resources (“HR”) Committee acts on behalf of and with
the concurrence of the Board with respect to matters relating to the Company concerning
compensation, benefits, and other personnel plans for employees; the election and
appointment of executive officers and other officers;
the
assessment of the performance of the CEO; and the compensation of non-employee members of
the Board. Our HR Committee is composed of not less than three nonemployee directors. Each
of the members of our HR Committee is an independent director as defined by NASD Rule
4200(a)(15). The members of our HR Committee are Chairman Philip L. Maslowe, Stephen
P. Adik and Julia L. Johnson. Our HR Committee held eight meetings during 2007.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
On February 27, 2008, our Board changed the name of our Governance Committee
to be our Nominating and Corporate Governance (“NCG”) Committee and adopted a
revised charter for this committee. Our NCG Committee assists the Board in identifying
qualified individuals to become Board members, in determining the composition of the Board
and its committees, in monitoring a process to assess Board effectiveness, and in
developing and implementing the Corporation’s corporate governance principles.
Further, the NCG Committee reviews and oversees the Corporation’s position on (a)
corporate social responsibilities and (b) public policy issues that significantly affect
the Corporation, its shareholders, its customers and other key stakeholders. Our NCG
Committee is composed of not less than three nonemployee directors. Each of the members of
the NCG Committee is an independent director as defined by NASD Rule 4200(a)(15). The
members of our NCG Committee are Chairwoman Julia L. Johnson, Jon S. Fossel and D.
Louis Peoples. Our NCG Committee held three meetings during 2007.
8
Our NCG Committee will consider nominees for directors properly recommended
by stockholders. A stockholder who wishes to submit a candidate for consideration at the
annual meeting of stockholders must notify our Corporate Secretary in writing not less than
90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary date of the preceding
year’s annual meeting. The stockholder’s written notice must include
information about each proposed nominee, including name, age, business address, principal
occupation, and other information required in proxy solicitations. The nomination notice
must also include the nominating stockholder’s name and address, the number of shares
of our common stock beneficially owned by the stockholder, and any arrangements or
understandings between the nominee and the stockholder. The stockholder must also furnish a
statement from the nominee indicating that the nominee wishes and is able to serve as a
director.
The NCG Committee will evaluate each director candidate to determine whether
such candidate should be recommended to the Board as a director nominee. In considering
director candidates, the NCG Committee will take into account whether a candidate has
skills, experience and background that add to and complement the range of skills,
experience and background of existing directors, based on the following: integrity,
accomplishments, business judgment, experience and education, commitment, representation of
stockholders, industry knowledge, independence and financial literacy.
The Company maintains on its Web site,
http://www.northwesternenergy.com,
copies of
the charters of each of the committees of the Board.
Communications with Our
Board
Stockholders may send communications to our Board. Communications should be
addressed to our Corporate Secretary at our principal offices at 3010 W. 69
th
Street, Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57108. The Corporate Secretary will forward directly to
the Board any communications received.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance
Based solely on information furnished to us and contained in reports filed
with the SEC, as well as written representations that no other reports were required,
NorthWestern believes that during 2007 all SEC filings of its directors and executive
officers complied with the requirements of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.
Transactions with
Related Persons
The Audit Committee, in conjunction with the Vice President, General Counsel
and Corporate Secretary, review and approve or ratify, when necessary, transactions
involving related parties. Our executive officers and directors annually complete a
questionnaire that includes questions about related party transactions. To the extent
described in the questionnaire, these transactions are brought to the attention of the
Audit Committee for review and approval or ratification. Because the questionnaire alerts
those individuals to seek approval of related party transactions, we expect such
transactions will be brought to our attention.
A review of the director and officer questionnaires revealed no material
related party transactions during 2007.
Move of Common Stock Listing to
the New York Stock Exchange
The Company expects to move its common stock listing from NASDAQ to the New
York Stock Exchange on May 1, 2008. We are in full compliance with all of the corporate
governance requirements of NYSE Euronext.
9
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS
General Philosophy
Total compensation should be reflective of individual performance and
company performance in achieving financial and non-financial objectives. We also believe
that a significant portion of an executive’s compensation should be “at
risk” in the form of annual incentive awards that are paid, if earned, based on
individual and company performance. Our executive compensation programs are therefore
designed to:
|
•
|
Attract and retain an executive team with an industry
competitive compensation
and benefits program;
|
|
•
|
Reflect our financial and operational size; and
|
|
•
|
Maximize stockholder value by emphasizing performance-based
compensation.
|
Currently, no executive has an employment contract and perquisites are
minimal.
Oversight of the
Executive Compensation Program
The HR Committee, in conjunction with the CEO, has overall responsibility to
recommend to the Board persons to serve as executive officers and approval of base salary,
annual and long-term compensation plans (including all awards made under the plans),
welfare benefit plans and retirement plans for the executive officers.
The HR Committee conducts an annual performance assessment of the CEO and
determines appropriate adjustments to all elements of total compensation based on
performance. The CEO performs assessments and recommends to the HR Committee total
compensation adjustments for the remaining executive officers. The HR Committee has
discretion to make adjustments to the CEO’s recommendations and recommends CEO and
executive officer compensation to the Board for approval.
The Company’s Human Resources Department is responsible for
administering the compensation and benefit plans and maintaining the executive compensation
philosophy.
Targeted Overall Compensation
and Competitive Analysis
We target market competitive base salary, annual cash incentive awards and
long-term equity grants, as well as total compensation. In 2007, the HR Committee engaged
Towers Perrin, an executive compensation consulting firm, to assist us in identifying
competitive compensation levels. As requested, Towers Perrin participates in HR Committee
meetings and assists the HR Committee in developing the compensation program. Towers Perrin
analyzed published survey data that focuses on the energy and utility industry and is
size-adjusted based on our revenues for appropriate market comparison, which includes
Towers Perrin Compensation DataBank, Mercer Benchmark Database and Watson Wyatt Survey
Report on Top Management Compensation. These surveys and the calculations to size-adjust by
revenue are proprietary tools of the sponsoring organizations and as such, the individual
companies to which we are compared are not disclosed.
The size-adjusted revenue data is the primary reference for determining
market competitive total compensation, base pay and annual incentive targets. For long-term
incentive purposes, Towers Perrin analyzed expected values using the Towers Perrin
Compensation DataBank, focusing on companies across industries and the energy services
industry, specifically with annual revenues less than $3 billion. The HR Committee and
management used this data to determine an appropriate blend of direct compensation, which
includes base salary and annual and long-term incentives, based on comparable
positions.
When determining the targeted compensation for executives, in addition to
the benchmarking data reviewed above, the HR Committee considers the scope of job,
incumbent performance and internal comparison with other officer positions.
10
Components of Executive Compensation
The components of total compensation for our executive officers are as
follows:
|
•
|
Annual cash incentive awards
|
|
•
|
Long-term equity grants
|
|
•
|
Perquisites and other benefits.
|
Base
Salary
Salary levels, for all executive officers, including the CEO, are targeted
to be market competitive with adjustments based on individual performance. The individual
characteristics that the officer brings to the organization, such as experience,
educational background and performance impact an officer’s base salary. Salaries for
our executive officers range between 85% and 120% of the size-adjusted market midpoint, as
provided by our compensation consulting firm.
Annual
Cash Incentive Awards
Annual cash incentive awards are used to motivate employees to meet and
exceed annual objectives that are a part of our strategic plan and reflect the performance
of NorthWestern, using both financial and operational measures and the individual
performance of the employee. Management annually proposes target metrics for company
financial and operational performance, which are reviewed and approved by the HR Committee
as well as the Board. At the end of the fiscal year, the HR Committee reviews data
submitted by management on company performance against each of the targets and determines
the final funding amount for each metric, subject to Board approval. The HR Committee may
use discretion in adjusting the final funding amounts from actual performance due to
specific facts and circumstances. As described further below, individual performance is
factored into the incentive calculation in the application of a performance multiple. The
annual incentive plan covers all employees.
Company Performance
The incentive metrics and targets established for 2007 included both
financial and operational measures. The financial measures are based on achieving
Board-approved earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) and
operating, general and administrative (OG&A) expenses, exclusive of merger transaction
and certain other Board-approved expenses. The company had to achieve at least 85% of the
net income target in order to receive funding for the financial metrics.
We believe that providing safe and reliable service to our customers’
satisfaction over the long-term is critical to maximizing shareholder value. As such, 45%
of the 2007 incentive plan funding was based on achievement of various operational
measures. The operational measures are targeted indices or averages for reliability,
customer satisfaction and safety. The following table shows the associated weighting and
final funding percentage for 2007 for each of the incentive metrics:
11
Incentive Metric
|
|
2007
Incentive Plan Funding Basis
|
|
Weight
|
|
Threshold 50%
|
|
Target
100%
|
|
Maximum
150%
|
|
Final Funding Results
|
|
Target %
Achieved
|
|
Final Funding % of Total
|
Financial
|
|
(Percent of total payout)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA (1)
|
|
40%
|
|
$203.9M
|
|
$226.6M
|
|
$249.2M
|
|
$222.5M
|
|
91.0%
|
|
36.4%
|
OG&A Expenses (2)
|
|
15%
|
|
$203.2M
|
|
$193.5M
|
|
$183.9M
|
|
$186.9M
|
|
129.6%
|
|
19.4%
|
Reliability (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAIDI - average system outage (minutes)
|
|
5%
|
|
115.00
|
|
102.70
|
|
90.90
|
|
109.64
|
|
71.8%
|
|
3.6%
|
CAIDI - average outage per customer (minutes)
|
|
5%
|
|
95.50
|
|
89.90
|
|
78.90
|
|
99.83
|
|
—
|
|
0.0%
|
SAIFI - # of interruptions per year
|
|
5%
|
|
1.20
|
|
1.14
|
|
1.00
|
|
1.10
|
|
113.5%
|
|
5.7%
|
Customer Satisfaction
(4)
(based on independent survey results)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Image
|
|
5%
|
|
7.00
|
|
7.25
|
|
7.50
|
|
7.49
|
|
148.0%
|
|
7.4%
|
Customer Service
(stated as rank compared with other survey
participants)
|
|
5%
|
|
5/16
|
|
4/16
|
|
3/16
|
|
10/16
|
|
—
|
|
0.0%
|
Overall Satisfaction
(stated as rank compared with other survey
participants)
|
|
5%
|
|
12/16
|
|
10/16
|
|
8/16
|
|
12/16
|
|
50.0%
|
|
2.5%
|
Safety (5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OSHA Recordable Target Rate
|
|
7.5%
|
|
6.60
|
|
5.00
|
|
4.15
|
|
6.20
|
|
—
|
|
0.0%
|
Lost Work Day Incident Target Rate
|
|
7.5%
|
|
3.00
|
|
2.00
|
|
1.49
|
|
3.00
|
|
—
|
|
0.0%
|
|
(1)
|
EBITDA is calculated as operating income plus depreciation
expense from our Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
|
|
(2)
|
OG&A expenses for determining incentive compensation are
exclusive of approximately $34.7 million as compared with OG&A expenses
from our Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31,
2007. The majority of excluded expenses related to our leasehold interest
in Colstrip Unit 4, which was excluded from the target and actual results
due to the unpredictable timing of acquiring our leased interest. In
addition, merger transaction and certain other Board-approved expenses were
excluded from the target and actual results.
|
|
(3)
|
SAIDI, CAIDI and SAIFI are system reliability indices used
by NorthWestern and participating Institute of Electrical and Electronic
Engineers, Inc. (“IEEE”) benchmarking utilities to measure the
duration and frequency of interuptions on a utility’s electric
system. SAIDI measures the average interruption duration for the system,
CAIDI measures the average duration interruption for a customer, and SAIFI
measures the average frequency of interruptions on our system.
Threshold targets for the reliability measures represent 2006 actual
results, targets at 100% represent the three-year company average for 2004
- 2006, and maximum targets represent 1
st
quartile performance
as compared with the IEEE three-year average.
|
|
(4)
|
Customer satisfaction is measured based on external surveys
that measure company image improvement, customer service and overall
satisfaction. Image is measured through an annual customer survey
reflecting customer views on reliability, customer service and image. An
independent party conducts the survey, and scoring ranges between 1 and 10
(10 being most favorable). Customer service and overall satisfaction are
measured as a rank against other utilities (1 is highest ranking, 16 is
lowest ranking), with threshold targets set with improvement as compared
with the prior year survey results.
|
|
(5)
|
Safety performance is calculated by NorthWestern and
participating Edison Electric Institute (“EEI”) benchmarking
utilities as defined by OSHA. OSHA specifically defines what workplace
injuries and illnesses should be recorded, and of those recorded, which
must be considered lost time incidents. Threshold targets for the safety
measures represent 2006 actual results, targets at 100% represent the EEI
industry average of comparable companies, and maximum targets represent
1
st
quartile performance as compared with the EEI industry
average of comparable companies. Maintaining the safety of our employees,
customers and the general public is always a primary consideration, and 15%
of our operating targets for 2007 is tied to this objective; however, we
experienced one worker fatality during the year, which reduced the score
for this category to zero.
|
12
Individual Performance and Targets
Annually each executive officer, in consultation with the CEO, sets
individual operational and financial performance goals supportive of corporate goals as
applicable to their area of responsibility. The CEO and executive officers are evaluated
against these goals to determine a performance rating. The Board determines the CEO’s
rating and final award. Individual awards for executive officers other than the CEO are
determined by the HR Committee, based on the CEO’s assessment of the
individual’s performance, and reviewed and approved by the Board.
Individual target incentive opportunities are expressed as a percentage of
base salary in accordance with market data. Individual payouts are calculated as
follows:
Base
Salary
x
Target Incentive %
x
Total Plan Payout %
x
Performance Multiple
= Individual Payout
Assuming achievement of the minimum financial metric threshold for payout,
this formula provides for individual payouts ranging from 85 to 130 percent of the
individual’s funded incentive opportunity. Total annual cash incentive distributions
for all employees cannot exceed the total plan percentage funding for the year.
For 2007, we paid 75% of target and over the last three years, the annual
incentive plan has been funded at an average of 67% of target. For 2008, we replaced the
EBITDA and OG&A expense metrics with net income as our financial incentive metric. The
remaining metrics and weightings for 2008 are consistent with those for 2007.
Long-term Equity Grants
Long-term equity grants are a key element of our total compensation package
for executive officers and are made in the form of restricted stock. The HR Committee
considers a long-term focus to be particularly important in the utility industry given the
long-term investment required. The long-term incentive percentage for the CEO and other
executive officers ranges from 35% to 70% of base salary. The HR Committee does not
consider any executive’s current stock holding to be so large as to warrant the
reduction or elimination of further long-term incentive awards.
Retirement Benefits
Retirement benefits are offered to all employees through tax-qualified
company-funded pension plans and a 401(k) defined contribution plan. Executive officers,
including the CEO, participate in these plans, and the terms governing the retirement
benefits under these plans are the same as those available for other employees. We do not
presently offer any supplemental retirement benefits to executive officers.
Perquisites and Other Benefits
The primary perquisites included in compensation for executive officers were
vehicle allowances or personal use of company-provided vehicles, subject to eligibility and
terms that apply to all employees as defined by policy. Vehicle allowances for all
executive officers were terminated at the end of 2007, with a corresponding increase to
base salary. Our healthcare, insurance, and other welfare and employee-benefit programs are
generally the same for all eligible employees, including the CEO and executive officers. We
share the cost of health and welfare benefits with our employees, which is dependent on the
benefit coverage option that each employee elects.
13
Human Resources Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
The HR Committee is composed of Chairman Philip L. Maslowe, Stephen P. Adik
and Julia L. Johnson. Each is an independent member as defined by NASD rule
4200(a)(15). None of the persons who served as members of our HR Committee during 2007 are
officers or employees or former employees of NorthWestern or any of our subsidiaries. In
addition, no executive officer of NorthWestern or any of its subsidiaries served as a
member of the Board or compensation committee of any other entity.
HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE REPORT
The HR Committee reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis with management. Based on this review and discussion, the HR Committee recommended
to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the proxy
statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Human Resources Committee
Philip
L. Maslowe, Chairman
Stephen
P. Adik
Julia L.
Johnson
14
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
We are required to disclose compensation earned during 2007 and 2006 for our
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and each of the three most highly
compensated persons who were executive officers as of December 31, 2007. Collectively,
these officers are referred to as Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”).
Summary Compensation
Table
The following table sets forth the compensation earned during 2007 and 2006
for services in all capacities by the NEOs:
|
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus (2)
|
|
Stock Awards
(1)
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Non-equity Incentive Plan Compensation
(2)
|
|
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation Earnings
(3)
|
|
All Other Compen- sation
(4)
|
|
Total
|
|
Michael J. Hanson
|
2007
|
|
$ 521,635
|
|
$ —
|
|
$ 431,975
|
|
$ —
|
|
$ —
|
|
$ 14
|
|
$ 53,175
|
|
$ 1,006,799
|
|
President & Chief
|
2006
|
|
494,231
|
|
—
|
|
175,625
|
|
—
|
|
169,014
|
|
10,901
|
|
46,972
|
|
896,743
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian B. Bird
|
2007
|
|
301,846
|
|
—
|
|
208,235
|
|
—
|
|
109,411
|
|
4,731
|
|
44,638
|
|
668,862
|
|
Vice President and
|
2006
|
|
287,500
|
|
—
|
|
96,505
|
|
—
|
|
69,537
|
|
10,722
|
|
32,646
|
|
496,910
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas J. Knapp
|
2007
|
|
265,420
|
|
—
|
|
139,482
|
|
—
|
|
77,842
|
|
7,950
|
|
46,338
|
|
537,033
|
|
Vice President,
|
2006
|
|
254,808
|
|
—
|
|
39,216
|
|
—
|
|
48,978
|
|
11,131
|
|
41,384
|
|
395,517
|
|
General Counsel &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory G. A. Trandem
|
2007
|
|
206,731
|
|
—
|
|
108,534
|
|
—
|
|
60,912
|
|
6,447
|
|
40,007
|
|
422,631
|
|
Vice President –
|
2006
|
|
199,588
|
|
—
|
|
31,205
|
|
—
|
|
36,240
|
|
10,327
|
|
34,874
|
|
312,234
|
|
Administrative Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtis T. Pohl
|
2007
|
|
190,000
|
|
—
|
|
93,973
|
|
—
|
|
51,846
|
|
—
|
|
41,426
|
|
377,245
|
|
Vice President – Retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations (5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
These values reflect compensation expense recognized for
restricted stock awards and are calculated utilizing the provisions of SFAS
No. 123R,
Share-Based
Payments
.
|
(2)
|
The Bonus column is used to reflect discretionary cash
bonuses paid to NEOs, if any. The Non-equity Incentive Plan Compensation
column reflects cash incentive awards earned pursuant to our annual
incentive plan as previously described. These awards are earned during the
year reflected and paid in the following fiscal year. Based on the failure
of the BBI transaction, an employee fatality during the year and other
discretionary factors, the Board determined that Mr. Hanson should not
receive an incentive award.
|
(3)
|
These amounts are attributable to a change in the value of
each NEOs’ defined benefit pension. We do not provide any
nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements to officers. Changes in
actuarial assumptions for discount rate from 5.75 percent to 6.25 percent
and interest crediting rate from 6.0 percent to 5.5 percent resulted in
significantly lower changes in pension value than was reported for 2006. In
Mr. Pohl’s case, the change in value was calculated at
($14,129).
|
(4)
|
All Other Compensation includes employer contributions, as
applicable, for medical, dental, vision, employee assistance plan, group
term life, and 401(k), which are generally available to all employees on a
nondiscriminatory basis. Also included are vehicle allowances or personal
use of a company vehicle, which totaled $14,400 for Mr. Hanson; $12,000 for
Mr. Bird; $10,200 for Mr. Knapp; and $9,000 for Mr. Pohl. Mr. Trandem
participated in a program, which provides for reimbursing the company for
costs associated with personal use of a company-owned vehicle.
|
(5)
|
Mr. Pohl did not meet the criteria in 2006 to be included as
an NEO.
|
15
Non-equity incentive plan compensation includes amounts earned under the
NorthWestern Energy 2007 Employee Incentive Plan. The HR Committee reviewed 2007
performance against plan targets and the plan funded at 75%. Officer awards varied from the
funded level based on guidelines applicable to all employees to reflect individual
performance, as follows:
|
|
Annual Target Incentive as Percent of Base
Pay
|
|
2007 Actual Incentive as Percent of Base
Pay
|
|
Incentive Award
|
Michael J. Hanson
|
|
70%
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
Brian B. Bird
|
|
50%
|
|
36.2%
|
|
109,411
|
Thomas J. Knapp
|
|
40%
|
|
29.3%
|
|
77,842
|
Gregory G. A. Trandem
|
|
40%
|
|
29.5%
|
|
60,912
|
Curtis T. Pohl
|
|
35%
|
|
27.3%
|
|
51,486
|
Grants of Plan-Based
Awards
There were no grants of plan-based awards during 2007.
Upon emergence from bankruptcy in 2004, a New Incentive Plan was established
pursuant to our Plan of Reorganization, which set aside 2,265,957 shares for the Board to
establish equity-based compensation plans for employees and directors. Stockholder approval
of the New Incentive Plan was not required under the provisions of the Plan of
Reorganization. Upon emergence from bankruptcy, 228,315 shares of restricted stock were
granted and approved by the Bankruptcy Court, with a vesting schedule determined by the
Board. The vesting schedule for awards granted under the 2004 Plan was as follows: 50% on
November 1, 2004; 10% on November 1, 2005; 20% on November 1, 2006; and 20% on
November 1, 2007. In March 2005, the Board established the NorthWestern Corporation
2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“2005 LTIP”), an equity-based plan, which
provides for grants of stock options, share appreciation rights, restricted and
unrestricted share awards, deferred share units and performance awards. We have elected to
provide all long-term incentive awards for employees in the form of restricted stock. The
2005 LTIP was initially funded with 700,000 shares of restricted stock from the New
Incentive Plan and substantially all of those shares were granted to employees, executives
and directors prior to 2007 as follows: (1) 400,000 shares were allocated for broad-based
employee grants; (2) 191,761 shares were granted to officers, management and non-employee
directors; and (3) 83,132 shares have been used for non-employee director annual stock
grants and deferred stock units related to deferred Board compensation. On October 31,
2007, the Board approved funding the 2005 LTIP with an additional 600,000 shares of
restricted stock from the shares set forth above; however, none of these shares have been
awarded to date.
EQUITY COMPENSATION
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
This table contains information regarding outstanding equity-based awards,
including the potential dollar amounts realizable with respect to each award, and requires
separate disclosure of option exercise prices and expiration dates for each award, as
applicable.
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
Exercisable
(#)
|
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
Unexercisable (#)
|
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options
(#)
|
|
Option Exercise Price
($)
|
|
Option Expiration Date
|
|
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not
Vested
(#)
|
|
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not
Vested
($)
|
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares,
Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
(#)
|
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of
Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
($)
|
|
Michael J. Hanson
|
|
11/6/06
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
25,655
|
|
|
$ 756,823
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Brian B. Bird
|
|
11/6/06
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
12,060
|
|
355,770
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Thomas J. Knapp
|
|
11/6/06
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
8,736
|
|
257,712
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Gregory G. A. Trandem
|
|
11/6/06
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
6,780
|
|
200,010
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Curtis T. Pohl
|
|
11/6/06
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5,823
|
|
171,779
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
The market value is as of December 31, 2007, and was determined utilizing
the closing stock price. Dividends are not paid or accrued on any unvested
shares.
In November 2006, the HR Committee and Board approved awarding the remaining
shares available under the 2005 LTIP in the form of restricted stock (66,438 shares for
NEOs). In doing so, the HR Committee and Board considered (1)
the
terms of the proposed Merger Agreement with BBI allowed for all of the shares available
under the 2005 LTIP to be awarded before completion of the transaction, without any impact
on the selling price; and (2) the fact that all supplemental retirement benefits, which are
typical for executives in the utility industry, had been terminated prior to or during
NorthWestern's bankruptcy.
The Board did not establish any performance targets for these awards;
however, they did establish a service-based vesting schedule over a period of five years as
follows:
|
•
|
One-ninth on November 1, 2007;
|
|
•
|
Two-ninths on November 1, 2008;
|
|
•
|
Three-ninths on November 1, 2009;
|
|
•
|
Two-ninths on November 1, 2010; and
|
|
•
|
One-ninth on November 1, 2011.
|
No equity awards were made to executives in 2007.
Option Exercises and Stock Vests
This table shows the dollar amounts realized pursuant to the vesting or
exercise of equity-based awards during the last fiscal year.
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
Grant
Date
|
|
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise
(#)
|
|
Value Realized on Exercise
($)
|
|
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting
(#)
|
|
Value Realized on Vesting
($)
|
Michael J. Hanson
|
11/6/06
|
|
—
|
|
$ —
|
|
3,207
|
|
$ 88,000
|
|
11/1/04
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
7,144
|
|
196,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian B. Bird
|
11/6/06
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,508
|
|
41,380
|
|
11/1/04
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4,288
|
|
117,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas J. Knapp
|
11/6/06
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,093
|
|
29,992
|
|
11/1/04
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,060
|
|
29,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory G. A. Trandem
|
11/6/06
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
848
|
|
23,269
|
|
11/1/04
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
874
|
|
23,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtis T. Pohl
|
11/6/06
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
728
|
|
19,976
|
|
11/1/04
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
888
|
|
24,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares vested during 2007 represent restricted shares granted on November 1,
2004 upon emergence from bankruptcy and shares granted on November 6, 2006 under the 2005
LTIP as discussed above. The value realized is determined by the fair market value of our
common stock on the date of vesting. This value is taxable compensation to the NEOs on the
date vested pursuant to Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) Section
83(a).
17
POST EMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION
Pension
Benefits
|
|
Plan Name
|
|
Number of Years Credited Service
|
|
Present Value of Accumulated Benefit
|
|
Payment During Last Fiscal Year
|
|
Michael J. Hanson
|
|
NorthWestern Pension Plan
|
|
9.58
|
|
|
$ 32,392
|
|
|
$ —
|
|
Brian B. Bird
|
|
NorthWestern Pension Plan
|
|
4.08
|
|
38,212
|
|
—
|
|
Thomas J. Knapp
|
|
NorthWestern Pension Plan
|
|
4.84
|
|
49,177
|
|
—
|
|
Gregory G. A. Trandem
|
|
NorthWestern Pension Plan
|
|
8.42
|
|
69,177
|
|
—
|
|
Curtis T. Pohl
|
|
NorthWestern Pension Plan
|
|
21.39
|
|
142,643
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The present value of accumulated benefits was calculated assuming benefits
commence at age 65 and using the discount rate, mortality assumption and assumed payment
form consistent with those disclosed in Note 16 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. While
the present values in the table above are required to be calculated assuming benefits
commence at age 65, the cash balance available if the individual were to terminate service
as of December 31, 2007 was as follows.
|
|
Cash
Balance
|
Michael J. Hanson
|
|
$ 103,480
|
Brian B. Bird
|
|
43,950
|
Thomas J. Knapp
|
|
52,662
|
Gregory G. A.
Trandem
|
|
73,644
|
Curtis T. Pohl
|
|
166,306
|
We have two defined benefit retirement plans, one applicable to our Montana
employees and one applicable to our South Dakota and Nebraska employees. All NEOs are
participants in the retirement plan applicable to South Dakota and Nebraska
employees.
Under the cash balance formula of the South Dakota and Nebraska plan, a
participant’s account grows based upon (1) annual pay credits, and
(2) annual interest credits based on the average Federal 30-year Treasury Bill rate
for November of the preceding year. Pay credits range from 3 percent to
7.5 percent (3 percent for all new employees) for compensation below the taxable wage
base and are doubled for compensation above the taxable wage base. Upon termination of
employment, an employee, or if deceased, his or her beneficiary, may elect to receive a
lump sum equal to the cash balance in the account, a monthly annuity if age 55 or greater,
or defer receiving benefits until they are required to take a minimum
distribution.
To be eligible for this retirement plan, an employee must be 21 years of age
and have worked at least one year for NorthWestern, working at least 1,000 hours in that
year. Non-employee directors are not eligible to participate. The present value of
accumulated benefits was calculated by Mercer Human Resources Consulting, the actuary for
our pension plans, using participant data provided by us.
Termination or Change In Control Arrangements
Severance Agreements
Our NEOs are participants in our 2006 Officer Severance Plan (Officer Plan).
The Officer Plan was reviewed by the HR Committee with recommendations from advisors and
approved by the Board. The Officer Plan provides for the payment of severance benefits in
the event an officer is involuntarily terminated without “cause.”
“Cause” generally is defined in the Officer Plan as (i) any form of illegal
conduct or gross misconduct that results in substantial damage to NorthWestern, (ii)
failure to comply with our Code of Conduct, (iii) willful failure to perform duties or (iv)
willful and continued conduct injurious to us. For this purpose, involuntary termination
does not include a termination resulting from a participant’s death or disability.
The severance benefits payable under the Officer Plan include:
18
(i) a
lump-sum cash payment equal to 1 times annual base pay, (ii) a pro-rata short-term
incentive bonus, (iii) reimbursement of COBRA premiums paid by the participant during
the 12-month period following the participant’s termination date, and (iv) $12,000 of
outplacement services during the 12-month period following the participant’s
termination date.
The Officer Plan also provides for change of control severance benefits in
the event an eligible officer is terminated within 18 months after a change of control of
NorthWestern. Change of control is generally defined in the Officer Plan as (i) an
acquisition of more than 50% of the combined voting power of our securities, (ii) a
change in the majority of our Board in any 12-month period, (iii) a merger, or
(iv) the sale or disposition of all or substantially all of our assets. Under the
change of control provisions, severance benefits are payable in the event an eligible
officer is involuntarily terminated by us without cause or in the event of a voluntary
termination by the participant with “good reason,” within 18 months after
a change of control. “Good reason” is generally defined in the Officer Plan as
(i) a reduction in annual compensation in excess of 15% or $10,000, whichever is greater,
(ii) relocation of more than 50 miles, (iii) the failure to provide an equivalent or
better position with the successor organization or (iv) the failure to obtain
satisfactory agreement from the successor to assume and agree to perform the Officer Plan.
The change of control benefits include: (i) a lump-sum cash payment equal to 2 times
Compensation to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and 1.5 times
Compensation to all other eligible officers (where Compensation is defined under Section
1.7 of the Officer Plan as annual base salary plus target annual short-term incentive pay),
(ii) a pro-rata short-term incentive bonus, (iii) reimbursement of COBRA premiums paid by
the participant during the 18-month period following the participant’s termination
date, and (iv) $12,000 in outplacement services during the 12-month period following the
participant’s termination date. In addition, the 2005 LTIP provides for accelerated
vesting in the event of a change of control.
In the event any benefits payable under the Officer Plan result in an excess
parachute payment under section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, such
change of control severance benefits is limited to the greater of: (i) the largest amount
which may be paid without any portion of such amount being subject to excise tax imposed by
Code Section 4999, or (ii) the change of control benefits payable under the Officer
Plan without regard to such limitation, less any excise tax imposed under Code Section
4999.
The HR Committee engaged Towers Perrin to evaluate severance and change of
control practices, particularly related to other utilities and believed it was important to
implement a plan to ensure retention of key employees in the event of employment
uncertainty related to the proposed BBI transaction. The HR Committee believes the approved
plan established a balance between the need to retain key employees without providing an
overly generous benefit.
The Officer Plan was set to expire on March 31, 2008. On March 28, 2008, our
Board approved extending the Officer Plan through September 30, 2008, while a more
comprehensive review of severance and LTIP benefits is conducted.
The following table shows the amount of potential cash severance that would
have been payable, based on an assumed termination date of December 31, 2007, to our NEOs
under the normal severance provisions of the plan including the amount that each executive
officer would be entitled to be reimbursed for outplacement expenses and reimbursement of
costs for continuing coverage and other benefits under our group health, dental and life
insurance plans to each executive officer. Severance benefits are not provided for
terminations with cause.
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
Short-Term Incentive
|
|
COBRA Premiums
|
|
Out Placement Services
|
|
Amount of Potential Severance Benefit
|
|
Michael J. Hanson
|
|
$ 521,635
|
|
$ 365,145
|
|
$ 15,165
|
|
$ 12,000
|
|
$ 913,944
|
|
Brian B. Bird
|
|
301,846
|
|
150,923
|
|
15,535
|
|
12,000
|
|
480,304
|
|
Thomas Knapp
|
|
265,420
|
|
106,168
|
|
19,137
|
|
12,000
|
|
402,725
|
|
Gregory G.A. Trandem
|
|
206,731
|
|
82, 692
|
|
15,535
|
|
12,000
|
|
316,958
|
|
Curtis T. Pohl
|
|
190,000
|
|
66,500
|
|
12,529
|
|
12,000
|
|
281,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
The
following table shows the amount of potential cash severance that would have been payable,
based on an assumed termination date of December 31, 2007, to our NEOs under the change of
control severance provisions of the plan including any accelerated restricted stock
vesting. The Officer Plan does not provide tax gross up payments. Change of control
benefits are not provided for terminations with cause.
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
Short-Term Incentive
|
|
COBRA Premiums
|
|
Out Placement Services
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Vesting (1)
|
|
Amount of Potential Change in Control
Benefit
|
|
|
Michael J. Hanson
|
|
$ 1,043,270
|
|
$ 1,095,434
|
|
$ 22,747
|
|
$ 12,000
|
|
$ 756,823
|
|
$ 2,483,985
|
(2)
|
|
Brian B. Bird
|
|
603,692
|
|
452,769
|
|
23,302
|
|
12,000
|
|
355,770
|
|
1,447,533
|
|
|
Thomas Knapp
|
|
398,130
|
|
265,420
|
|
28,705
|
|
12,000
|
|
257,712
|
|
961,967
|
|
|
Gregory G.A. Trandem
|
|
310,097
|
|
206,731
|
|
23,302
|
|
12,000
|
|
200,010
|
|
752,139
|
|
|
Curtis T. Pohl
|
|
285,000
|
|
166, 250
|
|
18,794
|
|
12,000
|
|
171,779
|
|
653,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Based on 12/31/2007 closing price of $29.50 per share.
(2) Overall benefit is subject to 280G limit according to plan
provisions.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
We do not provide any nonqualified defined contribution or other deferred
compensation plans.
Employment Agreements
No member of our Board or management has entered into an employment
agreement with our subsidiaries or us.
DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION
Compensation to our nonemployee directors consists of an annual cash
retainer, an annual unrestricted stock award, an annual cash retainer for the chair of each
committee of the Board, and meeting attendance fees. The following table shows the rates
for nonemployee director compensation for 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
Shares
|
Annual
Board Retainer
|
|
|
|
|
Initial
Stock Grant (sign-on grant to a new member)
|
|
NA
|
|
1,000
|
Board
Chair
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
3,000
|
Board
Member
|
|
25,000
|
|
2,000
|
Annual Committee Chair Retainer
|
|
|
|
|
Audit
Committee (1)
|
|
8,000
|
|
NA
|
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
|
|
6,000
|
|
NA
|
Human
Resources Committee
|
|
6,000
|
|
NA
|
Mergers
and Acquisitions Committee (2)
|
|
8,000
|
|
NA
|
Meeting Fees (3)
|
|
|
|
|
Board
Meeting
|
|
2,000
|
|
NA
|
Committee
Meeting
|
|
2,000
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
On October 31, 2007, the Board approved an increase to the
annual retainer for the Audit Committee Chair to $10,000.
|
|
(2)
|
On October 31, 2007, the Mergers and Acquisitions Committee
was disbanded.
|
|
(3)
|
The Board Chair does not receive meeting fees.
|
20
The following table sets forth the compensation earned by our nonemployee
directors for service on our Board during 2007. Employee directors are not compensated for
service on the Board.
|
|
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
($)
|
|
Stock Awards
($)
(1)
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Non-equity Incentive Plan Compensation
($)
(2)
|
|
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation Earnings
($)
|
|
All Other Compen- sation
($)
|
|
Total
($)
|
E. Linn Draper, Jr., Chair
|
|
$ —
|
|
$ 308,528
|
|
$ —
|
|
$ (64,143)
|
|
$ —
|
|
$ —
|
|
$ 244,385
|
Stephen P. Adik
|
|
62,000
|
|
205,998
|
|
—
|
|
(18,393)
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
249,605
|
Jon S. Fossel
|
|
79,000
|
|
172,998
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
251,998
|
Julia L. Johnson
|
|
—
|
|
249,998
|
|
—
|
|
(36,075)
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
213,923
|
Philip L. Maslowe
|
|
—
|
|
261,998
|
|
—
|
|
(43,010)
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
218,998
|
D. Louis Peoples
|
|
—
|
|
261,998
|
|
—
|
|
14,141
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
276,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
These values reflect the compensation expense recognized for
restricted stock awards and are calculated utilizing the provisions of SFAS
No. 123R,
Share-Based
Payments
. In addition, for those directors who
defer their compensation as described below, the meeting fee or retainer,
as applicable, is the value utilized to determine the amount of deferred
compensation.
|
(2)
|
These amounts reflect the earnings on compensation deferred,
which is tied to changes in the market value of our common
stock.
|
Nonemployee directors may elect to defer up to 100% of any qualified cash or
equity-based compensation that would be otherwise payable to him or her, subject to
compliance with NorthWestern’s 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Nonemployee
Directors and Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. The deferred compensation may
be invested in deferred stock units (“DSUs”) or designated investment funds.
Based on the election of the nonemployee director, following separation from service on the
Board, other than on account of death, he or she shall receive a distribution equal to one
share of common stock for each deferred stock unit either in a lump sum or in approximately
equal installments over a designated number years (not to exceed 10 years). The value of
the deferred compensation is adjusted based on increases or decreases in our common stock
market value, which is included in the Non-equity Incentive Plan Compensation column.
Messrs. Adik, Draper, Maslowe, Peoples and Ms. Johnson elected to defer all or a
portion of their 2007 director compensation into DSUs of our common stock.
Each member must retain at least five times his or her annual Board and
committee chair retainer(s) in common stock or DSUs within five years of commencing service
on our Board.
NorthWestern also reimburses nonemployee directors for the cost of
participation in certain continuing education programs and travel costs to
meetings.
21
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The following report is submitted on behalf of the Audit Committee of the
Board. The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board in its general oversight
of NorthWestern related to: (i) the accounting and financial reporting processes; (ii) the
audits and integrity of the financial statements; (iii) compliance with legal and
regulatory requirements; (iv) the independent auditor’s qualifications and
independence; and (v) the performance of the internal audit function and independent
auditors. We operate pursuant to a charter that was last amended in February 2007, a copy
of which is available on NorthWestern’s website at
http://www.northwesternenergy.com
.
In the performance of the Audit Committee’s oversight function, and in
connection with the December 31, 2007, financial statements, the Audit Committee reviewed
and discussed the audited financial statements with management, discussed with Deloitte
& Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) our independent registered public accounting
firm, the matters required by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, and SEC
Rule 2-07 of Regulation S-X, and received and discussed with the auditor the matters
required by Independence Standards Board Statement No. 1 and considered the compatibility
of non-audit services with the auditor’s independence.
Based on its review of the consolidated financial statements and discussions
with and representations from management and Deloitte referred to above, the Audit
Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in
NorthWestern Energy’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the
SEC.
Audit
Committee
Stephen
P. Adik, Chairman
Jon S.
Fossel
Philip
L. Maslowe
D. Louis
Peoples
22
PROPOSAL
2
RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Our Board has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent
registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements for the year ending
December 31, 2008, and recommends that stockholders vote for ratification of such
appointment. Although action by stockholders is not required by law, the Board has
determined that it is desirable to request approval of this selection by the stockholders.
Notwithstanding the selection, the Board, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of
a new independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the
Board feels that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its
stockholders. In the event of a negative vote on ratification, the Board will reconsider
its selection.
Representatives of Deloitte will be present at the annual meeting and will
be given the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and to respond to
appropriate questions. The following table is a summary of the fees billed to us by
Deloitte for professional services for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and
2006:
Fee
Category
|
|
|
|
|
Audit fees
|
|
$
|
1,440,000
|
|
$
|
1,755,000
|
Audit-related fees
|
|
—
|
|
93,500
|
Tax fees
|
|
174,000
|
|
834,000
|
All other fees
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
Total fees
|
|
$
|
1,614,000
|
|
$
|
2,682,500
|
Audit
Fees
Audit fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the
audit of our financial statements, internal control over financial reporting and review of
the interim financial statements included in quarterly reports and services that are
normally provided by Deloitte in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or
engagements.
Audit-related Fees
Audit-related fees consist of fees billed for assurance and related services
that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated
financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services
include employee benefit plan audits, attest services that are not required by statute or
regulation, and consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting
standards
.
Tax
Fees
Tax fees consist of fees billed for professional services for tax compliance
of $75,000 and $300,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and
tax consulting of $99,000 and $500,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. These services include assistance regarding federal and state tax compliance
and tax audit defense
.
All
Other Fees
All other fees consist of fees for products and services other than the
services reported above. In fiscal years 2007 and 2006, there were no other
fees.
23
Preapproval Policies and Procedures
Pursuant to the provisions of the Audit Committee Charter, before Deloitte
is engaged to render audit or nonaudit services, the Audit Committee must preapprove such
engagement. In 2007, the Audit Committee approved all such services undertaken by Deloitte
before engagement for such services.
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority in voting power of the
shares of our common stock which are present in person or represented by proxy and entitled
to vote thereon is required to ratify the selection of Deloitte. Accordingly, “broker
non-votes” will not affect the outcome of the vote on the proposal, although
abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal. Unless instructed to
the contrary in the proxy, the shares represented by the proxies will be voted
“FOR” the proposal to ratify the selection of Deloitte to serve as the
independent registered public accounting firm for NorthWestern for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2008.
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR”
THE
RATIFICATION OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
AS
OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM.
24
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
Stockholder proposals to be considered for inclusion in the proxy statement
relating to the 2009 annual meeting must be received by the Corporate Secretary of
NorthWestern Corporation not later than December 16, 2008, in accordance with Rule 14a-8 of
the Exchange Act.
Stockholder proposals to be brought before the annual meeting but not
included in our 2009 proxy statement and form of proxy must be received by the Corporate
Secretary of NorthWestern Corporation on or after January 21, 2009, and prior to
February 20, 2009, in accordance with the provisions set forth in our
bylaws.
Stockholder proposals should be delivered to or mailed and received by us on
the dates set forth above addressed to:
Corporate
Secretary
|
NorthWestern
Corporation
|
3010 W.
69
th
Street
|
Sioux Falls,
SD 57108
|
OTHER MATTERS
Other
Business at the 2008 Annual Meeting – Discretionary Voting Authority
Management is not aware of any matter to be brought before the annual
meeting, other than the matters described in the Notice of Annual Meeting accompanying this
proxy statement. The persons named in the form of proxy solicited by our Board will vote
all proxies, which have been properly executed, and if any matters not set forth in the
Notice of Annual Meeting are properly brought before the meeting, such persons will vote
thereon in accordance with their best judgment.
Multiple Stockholders Sharing the Same Address
In accordance with notices we previously sent to “street name”
stockholders who share a single address, we are sending only one Annual Report and Form
10-K, Form 10-Q and Proxy Statement to that address unless we received contrary
instructions from any stockholders at that address. This practice, known as
“householding,” is designed to reduce our printing and postage costs. However,
if any stockholder residing at such an address wishes to receive a separate Annual Report
or Proxy Statement in the future, he or she may contact our Corporate Secretary. If you are
receiving multiple copies of our annual report and proxy statement, you can request
householding by contacting our Corporate Secretary Thomas J. Knapp, NorthWestern
Corporation, 3010 W. 69
th
Street, Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57108.
Where
You Can Find Additional Information
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other
information with the SEC. You may read and copy any reports, proxy statements or other
information that we file with the SEC at the following location of the SEC:
Public Reference Room
100 F Street, N.E.
Room 1580
Washington, D.C. 20549
25
Please call the SEC at 1+ 800 SEC-0330 for further information on the public
reference room. You may also obtain copies of this information by mail from the Public
Reference Section of the SEC, 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549,
at prescribed rates. Our public filings are also available to the public from document
retrieval services and the Internet Web site maintained by the SEC at
www.sec.gov
.
Reports, proxy statements or other information concerning us may also be
inspected at the offices of the NASDAQ National Market at:
One Liberty Plaza
165 Broadway
New York, NY 10006
Assistance
If you need assistance with voting your proxy or have questions regarding
our annual meeting, please contact
:
Dan Rausch
Director – Investor Relations
(605) 978-2902
|
or
|
Tammy Lydic
Assistant Corporate Secretary
(605) 978-2945
|
Any person, including any beneficial owner, to whom this proxy statement is
delivered may request copies of reports, proxy statements or other information concerning
us, without charge, by written or telephonic request directed to us at NorthWestern
Corporation, 3010 W. 69
th
Street, Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57108, Attention:
Investor Relations. If you would like to request documents, please do so by May 15, 2008,
in order to receive them before the annual meeting.
No persons have been authorized to give any information or to make any
representations other than those contained in this proxy statement and, if given or made,
such information or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized by us
or any other person. This proxy statement is dated April 15, 2008. You should not assume
that the information contained in this proxy statement is accurate as of any date other
than that date, and the mailing of this proxy statement to stockholders shall not create
any implication to the contrary.
26
ANNUAL MEETING
GUIDELINES
In the
interest of an orderly and constructive meeting, the following guidelines will apply to
NorthWestern’s annual meeting:
|
•
|
The annual meeting is open only to our stockholders and our
invited guests. Stockholders attending the annual meeting should present an
admittance ticket or evidence of NorthWestern Corporation (NASDAQ: NWEC)
stock ownership to gain entrance. You may be asked to provide photo
identification, such as a driver’s license, in order to gain
admittance to the annual meeting.
|
|
•
|
The business of the meeting will follow as set forth in the
agenda, which you will receive at the meeting entrance. If you wish to
change your vote or have not voted, ballots will be distributed to you to
cast your votes.
|
|
•
|
Stockholder questions and comments related to our business
will be addressed only during the question and answer portion of the agenda
at the end of the annual meeting.
|
|
•
|
Stockholders will be recognized on a rotation basis, and
their questions or remarks must be relevant to the meeting, pertinent to
matters properly before the meeting, and briefly stated with a time limit
of three minutes.
|
|
•
|
Although personal grievances, claims and political
statements are not appropriate subjects for the annual meeting, you may
submit in writing any of these to an usher or company representative, and
we will respond in writing.
|
|
•
|
The use of cameras or sound recording equipment is
prohibited, except by those employed by the company to provide a record of
the proceedings. The use of cell phones and other personal communication
devices also is prohibited during the annual meeting.
|
|
•
|
No firearms or weapons will be allowed in the meeting
room.
|
|
•
|
No banners or signs will be allowed in the meeting
room.
|
|
•
|
We reserve the right to inspect all items entering the
meeting room. Handbags, briefcases and packages may be
inspected.
|
IMPORTANT:
PLEASE VOTE YOUR SHARES PROMPTLY
|
27
[ADMISSION
TICKET]
[front
side]
ADMISSION
TICKET
NorthWestern Corporation
Annual
Meeting of Stockholders
May 21,
2008
10:00 a.m.
Eastern Daylight Time
New York
Marriott Downtown Hotel
85 West
Street at Albany Street
New York,
N.Y.
[company
logo]
[back
side]
[map
showing annual meeting location]
[PROXY
VOTING CARD – front side]
NORTHWESTERN CORPORATION
3010 W.
69TH STREET, SIOUX FALLS, SD 57108
PROXY FOR
THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 21, 2008
THIS
PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The
undersigned hereby appoints E. Linn Draper, Jr. and Michael J. Hanson, and each of them,
with full power of substitution, attorneys and proxies to represent the undersigned at the
2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of NORTHWESTERN CORPORATION to be held at the New York
Marriott Downtown Hotel, 85 West Street at Albany Street, New York, NY at 10:00 a.m.
Eastern Daylight Time, on Wednesday, May 21, 2008, or at any adjournment or postponement
thereof, with all power which the undersigned would possess if personally present, and to
vote all shares of common stock of the Company which the undersigned may be entitled to
vote at said Meeting as follows:
PLEASE
VOTE PROMPTLY BY INTERNET, PHONE OR MAIL.
(continued and to be signed on the reverse side)
Address
Change/Comments (Mark the corresponding box on the reverse side)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLD AND
DETACH HERE
You can
now access your NorthWestern Corporation account online.
Access
your NorthWestern Corporation shareholder account
online
via Investor ServiceDirect® (ISD).
LaSalle
Bank, N.A., Transfer Agent for NorthWestern Corporation, now makes it easy and convenient
to get current information on your shareholder account.
• View account
status
|
• View payment
history for dividends
|
• View certificate
history
|
• Make address
changes
|
• View certificate
history
|
• Obtain a duplicate
1099 tax form
|
• View book-entry
information
|
• Establish/change
your PIN
|
Visit us
on the web at http://www.lasalleshareholderservices.com
****TRY
IT OUT***
www.lasalleshareholderservices.com/isd/
Investor
ServiceDirect®
Available
24 hours per day, 7 days per week
YOUR VOTE
IS IMPORTANT!
PLEASE
VOTE PROMPTLY BY INTERNET, PHONE OR MAIL
[PROXY
VOTING CARD – back side]
THIS
PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED, OR IF NO DIRECTION IS INDICATED,
WILL BE
VOTED “FOR” THE PROPOSALS.
THIS
PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
Mark Here
for Address Change or Comments PLEASE SEE REVERSE SIDE _____
Please mark
vote like this in blue or black ink. X
1. Election
of Directors
Nominees:
01 Stephen
P. Adik
02 E. Linn
Draper, Jr.
03 Jon S.
Fossel
04 Michael
J. Hanson
05 Julia L.
Johnson
06 Philip
L. Maslowe
07 D. Louis
Peoples
For All __
|
Withhold All __
|
For All Except __
|
_________________________________________________
For all
nominees except as noted above.
2.
Ratification of selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent registered accounting
firm for fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
For __
|
Against __
|
Abstain __
|
3. Upon
such other matters as may come before said meeting or any adjournment or postponement
thereof, in the discretion of the Proxyholders.
THIS PROXY,
WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED BY THE UNDERSIGNED
STOCKHOLDER(S). IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE
NOMINEES NAMED IN ITEM 1, AND “FOR” RATIFICATION OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
AS INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM IN ITEM 2.
Signature
____________________ Signature ____________________ Date __________
Please sign
exactly as name(s) appear on this Proxy. Joint owners should each sign personally.
Corporation Proxies should be signed by authorized officer. When signing as executors,
administrators, trustees, etc., give full title.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLD AND
DETACH HERE
WE
ENCOURAGE YOU TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF INTERNET OR TELEPHONE VOTING,
BOTH ARE
AVAILABLE 24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK.
Internet
and telephone voting is available through 11:59 PM Eastern time
the day
prior to annual meeting day.
Your
Internet or telephone vote authorizes the named proxies
to vote
your shares in the same manner as if you
marked,
signed and returned your proxy card.
Internet
http://www.proxyvoting.com/nwec
Use the
Internet to vote your proxy.
Have your
proxy card in hand when you access the web site.
Or
Telephone
1-866-540-5760
Use any
touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy.
Have your
proxy card in hand when you call.
If you
vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.
To vote by mail, mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the enclosed
postage-paid envelope.
Choose
MLink
SM
for fast, easy and secure 24/7 online access to your future proxy
materials, investment plan statements, tax documents and more. Simply log on to Investor
ServiceDirect
®
at www.lasalleshareholderservices.com/isd/ where step-by-step
instructions will prompt you through enrollment.
Northwestern (MM) (NASDAQ:NWEC)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Okt 2024 bis Nov 2024
Northwestern (MM) (NASDAQ:NWEC)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Nov 2023 bis Nov 2024