UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN
PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR
15d-16 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the month of July 2023
SAFE BULKERS,
INC.
(Translation of registrant’s name into English)
Apt. D11,
Les Acanthes
6, Avenue des Citronniers
MC98000 Monaco
Telephone : +30 2 111 888 400
(Address of principal executive office)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file
annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form
6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1) ____:
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form
6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7) ____:
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the
information contained in the Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
If “Yes” is marked, indicate below the file number
assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): ____.
EXHIBIT INDEX
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
Date: July 20, 2023
|
SAFE BULKERS, INC., |
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ KONSTANTINOS ADAMOPOULOS |
|
Name: |
Konstantinos Adamopoulos |
|
Title: |
Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 99.1
SAFE BULKERS, INC.
Apt. D11, Les Acanthes
6, Avenue des Citronniers
MC98000, Monaco
July 20, 2023
Dear Stockholder:
You are cordially invited
to attend the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Safe Bulkers, Inc., which will be held on Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 16:00 local
time at the Fairmont Hotel, 12 Avenue des Spélugues, Monte Carlo, 98000 Monaco.
The following Notice of 2023
Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement describe the items to be considered by the stockholders at such meeting and contain
certain information about us and our executive officers and directors.
This year, we have elected
to take advantage of the “Notice and Access” rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to furnishing our
proxy materials and our 2022 Annual Report to stockholders over the Internet. We believe this process provides a convenient and quick
way to access your proxy materials and the 2022 Annual Report. Expanded electronic dissemination expedites receipt of your proxy materials
and the 2022 Annual Report while allowing us to reduce the environmental impact of, and certain costs associated with, our annual meeting.
Many stockholders will receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) containing convenient
instructions on how to access annual meeting materials via the Internet. If you received the Notice, you will not receive a printed copy
of the proxy materials or the 2022 Annual Report, unless you specifically request one. The Notice provides instructions on how to receive
paper copies if preferred and how to vote via the Internet, by telephone or by mail.
Your vote is important to
us. In order to ensure your representation at the meeting, you may submit your proxy and voting instructions via the Internet or by telephone,
or, if you receive a paper proxy card and voting instructions by mail, you may vote your shares by completing, signing and dating the
proxy card as promptly as possible and returning it in the envelope which accompanied the card. Please refer to the section entitled
“Voting via the Internet, by Telephone or by Mail” of the accompanying proxy statement for a description of these voting
methods. You can revoke a previously delivered proxy at any time prior to voting, or vote your shares personally if you attend the meeting.
We look forward to seeing you.
|
Sincerely, |
|
|
|
Polys Hajioannou Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. IN ORDER TO ENSURE
YOUR REPRESENTATION AT THE 2023 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS AND THAT A QUORUM WILL BE PRESENT, WE URGE YOU TO SUBMIT YOUR VOTE AS
SOON AS POSSIBLE. A PROMPT RESPONSE IS HELPFUL AND YOUR COOPERATION WILL BE APPRECIATED. VOTING VIA THE INTERNET, BY TELEPHONE OR BY
MAIL WILL NOT AFFECT YOUR RIGHT TO VOTE IN PERSON, SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO ATTEND THE 2023 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS.
SAFE BULKERS, INC.
Apt. D11, Les Acanthes
6, Avenue des Citronniers
MC98000, Monaco
NOTICE
OF 2023 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 7, 2023
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that
the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Safe Bulkers, Inc., a Marshall Islands corporation, will be held at 16:00 local time, on Thursday,
September 7, 2023 at the Fairmont Hotel, 12 Avenue des Spélugues, Monte Carlo, 98000 Monaco, for the following purposes:
1. |
To elect three Class III directors to hold office until the annual meeting
of stockholders in 2026 and until their respective successors have been duly elected and qualified; |
|
|
2. |
To ratify the appointment of our independent auditors; and |
|
|
3. |
To transact such other business as may properly come before the 2023 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders and any adjournments or postponements thereof. |
Only holders of record of
Common Stock at the close of business on July 17, 2023 will be entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the 2023 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders and at any adjournments or postponements thereof.
You are cordially invited
to attend the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Whether or not you plan to attend the 2023 Annual Meeting in person, please vote as
soon as possible via the Internet, by telephone or, if you receive a paper proxy card in the mail, by mailing a completed proxy card.
For detailed information regarding voting instructions, please refer to the section entitled “Voting via the Internet, by Telephone
or by Mail” beginning on page 1 of the accompanying proxy statement. You may revoke a previously delivered proxy at any time prior
to the 2023 Annual Meeting. If you decide to attend the 2023 Annual Meeting and wish to change your proxy vote, you may do so by voting
in person at the 2023 Annual Meeting.
Important
Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials
for the Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on September 7, 2023
The Company’s
Proxy Statement, form of proxy card and 2022 Annual Report are available
at: http://sb.agmdocuments.com/ASM2023.html
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors |
|
|
|
Dr. Loukas Barmparis
President and Secretary
Monaco
July 20, 2023 |
SAFE BULKERS, INC.
Apt. D11, Les Acanthes
6, Avenue des Citronniers
MC98000, Monaco
PROXY STATEMENT
FOR 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
TO BE HELD ON THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 2023
INFORMATION CONCERNING SOLICITATION AND VOTING
GENERAL
The proxy is solicited on
behalf of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Safe Bulkers, Inc., a Marshall Islands corporation (the “Company”),
for use at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 16:00 local time, on Thursday, September 7, 2023 at the Fairmont Hotel,
12 Avenue des Spélugues, Monte Carlo, 98000 Monaco, or at any adjournment or postponement thereof (the “Meeting”),
for the purposes set forth herein and in the accompanying Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. On or about July 20, 2023, the
Company will first mail to certain stockholders of record the Notice of Internet Availability of proxy materials containing instructions
on how to access this Proxy Statement online, or in the alternative, request a paper copy of the proxy materials and a proxy card, and
also will first mail to certain other stockholders this Proxy Statement and proxy card.
VOTING
RIGHTS AND OUTSTANDING SHARES
As of July 17, 2023 (the
“Record Date”), the Company had outstanding 111,584,714 shares of common
stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”). As of the Record Date, the Hajioannou family (including Polys Hajioannou),
owned 48,381,427 shares of Common Stock, constituting approximately 43.36% of the outstanding
shares of Common Stock. Each stockholder of record at the close of business on the Record Date is entitled to one vote for each share
of Common Stock then held. A majority of the Common Stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Meeting, the holders of
which are present in person or represented by proxy, shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Meeting. The Common
Stock represented by any proxy delivered by way of proxy card or in accordance with the procedures set forth in the section entitled
“Voting via the Internet, by Telephone or by Mail” beginning on page 1 of this proxy statement will be voted in accordance
with the instructions given on the proxy if the proxy is properly executed and is received by the Company prior to the close of voting
at the Meeting. Any proxies returned without instructions will be voted FOR the proposals set forth on the Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders.
The Common Stock is listed
on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the symbol “SB.”
VOTING
VIA THE INTERNET, BY TELEPHONE OR BY MAIL
Registered Holders
If you are a “registered
holder” (meaning your shares are registered in your name with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company,
LLC), then you may vote either in person at the 2023 Annual Meeting or by proxy. If you decide to vote by proxy, you may vote via the
Internet, by
telephone or by mail and your shares will be
voted at the 2023 Annual Meeting in the manner you direct. For those stockholders who receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy
Materials, such notice provides information on how to access your proxy card, which contains instructions on how to vote via the Internet
or by telephone or receive a paper proxy card to vote by mail. Telephone and Internet voting facilities for stockholders of record will
close at 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on September 6, 2023.
Beneficial Holders
If, like most stockholders,
you are a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” (meaning a broker, trustee, bank, or other nominee holds shares
on your behalf), you may vote in person at the 2023 Annual Meeting only if you obtain a legal proxy from the nominee that holds your
shares and present it to the inspector of elections with your ballot at the 2023 Annual Meeting. Alternatively, you may provide
instructions to the nominee that holds your shares to vote by completing, signing and returning the voting instruction form that the
nominee provides to you, or by using the voting arrangements described on the voting instruction form, the Notice of Internet Availability
of Proxy Materials or other materials that the nominee provides to you.
REVOCABILITY
OF PROXIES
A Stockholder giving a proxy
may revoke it at any time before it is exercised. A proxy may be revoked by filing with the Secretary of the Company at the Company’s
principal executive office in Monaco at Apt. D11, Les Acanthes 6, Avenue des Citronniers, MC98000, Monaco, a written notice of revocation
or by a duly executed proxy bearing a later date or by attending the Meeting and voting in person.
PROPOSAL ONE
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Company currently has
nine directors divided into three classes. As provided in the Company’s First Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as
amended, each director is elected to serve for a three-year term until the annual meeting for the year in which his or her term expires
and until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified. The Board has nominated Konstantinos Adamopoulos, Kristin H. Holth
and Frank Sica, each a Class III Director, for re-election as Class III Directors for terms expiring at the 2026 annual meeting and until
their successors have been duly elected and qualified. The Board has determined that Kristin H. Holth and Frank Sica are independent
within the current meanings of independence employed by the corporate governance rules of the NYSE and the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “SEC”).
Unless a proxy is marked
to indicate that such authorization is expressly withheld, the persons named in a submitted proxy card intend to vote the shares authorized
thereby FOR the election of the following two nominees. It is expected that each of these nominees will be able to serve, but if before
the election it develops that any of the nominees is unavailable, the persons named in a submitted proxy card will vote for the election
of such substitute nominee or nominees as the current Board may recommend.
Directors shall be elected
by a plurality of the votes cast at the Meeting.
NOMINEES FOR ELECTION
Name |
|
Age (1) |
|
Positions |
|
Class |
|
Term to
Expire |
|
Director
Since |
Konstantinos Adamopoulos |
|
61 |
|
Chief Financial Officer and Director |
|
Class III |
|
2026 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kristin H.Holth (2) |
|
67 |
|
Director |
|
Class III |
|
2026 |
|
2023 |
Frank Sica (3) |
|
72 |
|
Director |
|
Class III |
|
2026 |
|
2008 |
(1) |
As of July 20, 2023. |
(2) |
Member of the corporate governance,
nominating and compensation committee and the audit committee. |
(3) |
Member of the corporate governance,
nominating and compensation committee and chairman of the audit committee. |
Nominees for Election
The Board has nominated the
following individuals to serve as Class III directors for a three-year term expiring at the 2026 annual meeting and until their successors
have been duly elected and qualified:
Konstantinos Adamopoulos
Chief Financial Officer and Class III Director
Konstantinos Adamopoulos
is our Chief Financial Officer and has been a member of our board of directors since 2008. Mr. Adamopoulos also serves as the finance
manager of Safe Bulkers Management Ltd., which he joined in December 2016. Prior to joining us, Mr. Adamopoulos was employed at Calyon,
a financial institution, as a senior relationship manager in shipping finance for 14 years. Prior to this, from 1990 to 1993, Mr. Adamopoulos
was employed by the National Bank of Greece in London as an account officer for shipping finance and in Athens as deputy head of the
export finance department. Prior to this, from 1987 to 1989, Mr. Adamopoulos served as a finance officer in the Greek Air Force. Mr.
Adamopoulos holds a Bachelor of Science degree in business administration from the Athens School of Economics and Business Science and
an M.B.A. in finance from the Cass Business School, City University of London.
Kristin H. Holth
Class
III Director
Kristin H. Holth has been
a member of our board of directors since 2023. Ms. Holth previously served as Executive Vice President and Global Head of Ocean Industries
for DNB Bank ASA (“DNB”), Norway’s largest financial services group and a global leading financial institution within
the Ocean Industries. Ms. Holth has significant experience in capital markets and funding, and has held numerous management positions
within DNB over the years, including serving as Global Head of Shipping, Offshore & Logistics for four years, and General Manager
& Head of DNB Americas for six years. Ms. Holth currently serves on several boards, including Noble Corporation (NYSE: NE), GasLog
Partners LP (NYSE: GLOP), Maersk Tankers, and HitecVision AS. Ms. Holth holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in international
finance from BI Norwegian Business School.
Frank Sica
Class III Director
Frank Sica has been a member of our board of
directors and of our corporate governance, nominating and compensation committee, and a member and chairman of our audit committee, since
2008. Mr. Sica was a director of CSG Systems International, an account management and billing software company for communication industries,
JetBlue Airways Corporation, a commercial airline, and Kohl’s Corporation, an owner and operator of department stores. Mr. Sica
has served as a Partner at Tailwind Capital, a private equity firm, since 2006. From 2004 to 2005, Mr. Sica was a Senior Advisor to Soros
Private Funds Management. From 1998 to 2003, Mr. Sica worked at Soros Fund Management where he oversaw the direct real estate and private
equity investment activities of Soros. From 1988 to 1998, Mr. Sica was a Managing Director at Morgan Stanley. Mr. Sica holds a bachelor’s
degree from Wesleyan University and an M.B.A. from the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College.
DIRECTORS CONTINUING IN OFFICE
Name |
|
Age (1) |
|
Positions |
|
Class |
|
Term to
Expire |
|
Director
Since |
Polys Hajioannou |
|
56 |
|
Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and Director |
|
Class I |
|
2024 |
|
2008 |
Ioannis Foteinos |
|
64 |
|
Chief Operating Officer and Director |
|
Class I |
|
2024 |
|
2009 |
Ole Wikborg(2) |
|
67 |
|
Director |
|
Class I |
|
2024 |
|
2008 |
Loukas Barmparis |
|
61 |
|
President, Secretary of the Board and Director |
|
Class II |
|
2025 |
|
2008 |
Marina Hajioannou |
|
24 |
|
Director |
|
Class II |
|
2025 |
|
2023 |
Christos Megalou (3) |
|
64 |
|
Director |
|
Class II |
|
2025 |
|
2016 |
(1) |
As of July 20, 2023. |
(2) |
Member of the audit committee and
chairman of the corporate governance, nominating and compensation committee. |
(3) |
Member of the audit committee and
member of the corporate governance, nominating and compensation committee. |
The following directors will
continue in office:
Class I Directors—Term
to Expire in 2024
Polys Hajioannou
Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and Class I Director
Polys Hajioannou is our Chief Executive Officer
and has been Chairman of our board of directors since 2008. Mr. Hajioannou also serves with Safe Bulkers Management Ltd. in Cyprus, which
provides technical, commercial and administrative management services to the Company, and prior to the inception of Safe Bulkers Management
and Safety Management, with its predecessor Alassia Steamship Co., Ltd., which he joined in 1987. Mr. Hajioannou was elected as a member
of the board of directors of the Union of Greek Shipowners in 2006 and served on the board until February 2009. Mr. Hajioannou is a founding
member and Vice-President of the Union of Cyprus Shipowners. Mr. Hajioannou is a member of the Lloyd’s Register Hellenic Advisory
Committee. In 2011, Mr. Hajioannou was appointed to the board of directors of the Hellenic Mutual War Risks Association (Bermuda) Limited
and in 2013 he was elected at the board of directors of the UK Mutual Steam Ship Assurance Association (Bermuda) Limited where he served
until 2016. In that year, he was elected member to the newly established UK Club Bermuda Members’ Committee. Mr. Hajioannou holds
a Bachelor of Science degree in nautical studies from Sunderland University.
Ioannis Foteinos
Chief Operating Officer and Class I Director
Ioannis Foteinos is our Chief Operating Officer
and has been a member of our board of directors since February 2009. Mr. Foteinos has 30 years of experience in the shipping industry.
After obtaining a bachelor’s degree in nautical studies from Sunderland University, he joined the predecessor of Safety
Management in 1987, where he served as Chartering
Manager until 2017. Presently he serves as Chartering Manager with Safe Bulkers Management Ltd. in Cyprus, which he joined in May 2017.
Ole Wikborg
Class I Director
Ole Wikborg has been a member
of our board of directors and of our audit committee and chairman and member of our corporate governance, nominating and compensation
committee since 2008. Mr. Wikborg has been involved in the marine and shipping industry in various capacities for over 35 years. From
2002 to 2016, Mr. Wikborg has served as a member of the management team, a director and a senior underwriter of the Norwegian Hull Club,
based in Oslo, Norway. In 2016, he moved to London to take up the position as the head of the London branch of Norwegian Hull Club, established
that year. He retired from his position in Norwegian Hull Club in October 2022. From 2002 to 2006, Mr. Wikborg also served
as a member and chairman of the Ocean Hull Committee of the International Union of Marine Insurance (“IUMI”). Since 2006,
he has served as Vice President and a member of the Executive Board of the IUMI, and he was elected as President of IUMI from 2010 to
2014. Since 1997, Mr. Wikborg has served as a board member of the Central Union of Marine Insurers, based in Oslo, and was that organization’s
Chairman from 2009 to 2013. From 1997 until 2002, Mr. Wikborg served as the senior vice president and manager of the marine and energy
division of the Zurich Protector Insurance Company ASA. Prior to his career in marine insurance, Mr. Wikborg served in the Royal Norwegian
Navy, attaining the rank of Lieutenant Commander.
Class II Directors—Term to Expire
in 2025
Dr. Loukas Barmparis
President, Secretary of the Board and Class II Director
Dr. Loukas Barmparis is our President and Secretary
and has been a member of our board of directors since 2008. Dr. Barmparis also serves as the technical manager of Safe Bulkers Management
Ltd., which he joined in December 2016. Between 2009 and 2016, he was the technical manager of Safety Management Overseas S.A. Until
2009, he was the project development manager of the affiliated Alassia Development S.A., responsible for renewable energy projects. Prior
to joining our Manager and Alassia Development S.A., from 1999 to 2005 and from 1993 to 1995, Dr. Barmparis was employed at N. Daskalantonakis
Group, Grecotel, one of the largest hotel chains in Greece, as technical manager and project development general manager. During the
interim period between 1995 and 1999, Dr. Barmparis was employed at Exergia S.A. as an energy consultant. Dr. Barmparis holds a master
of business administration (“M.B.A.”) from the Athens Laboratory of Business Administration, a doctorate from the Imperial
College of Science Technology and Medicine, a master of applied science from the University of Toronto and a diploma in mechanical engineering
from the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
Marina Hajioannou
Class II Director
Marina Hajioannou has been a member of our board
of directors since 2023 and is working in chartering and operations for Safe Bulkers Inc. Ms. Hajioannou holds a Bachelor Degree in Fine
Arts at Chelsea College of Art and Design, UAL and a certificate in shipping from Hellenic Management Center/ICS.
Christos Megalou
Class II Director
Christos Megalou has been
a member of our board of directors since 2016 and serves as a member of our audit and our corporate governance, nominating and compensation
committee. Mr. Megalou has been the Chief Executive Officer of Piraeus Bank SA since 2017. Mr. Megalou has been a Distinguished Fellow
of the Global Federation Of Competitiveness Councils in Washington, D.C. since 2016. From 2015 to 2016, Mr. Megalou served as senior
advisor to Fairfax Financial Holdings. From 2013 to 2015, Mr. Megalou served as the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Executive
Board of Eurobank Ergasias SA and was the Deputy Chairman of the Hellenic Bank Association in Greece. From 2010 to 2013, Mr. Megalou
served as Chairman of the Hellenic Bankers Association in the U.K. From 1997 to 2013, he was Vice-Chairman of Southern Europe, Co-head
of Investment Banking for Southern Europe and Managing Director in the Investment Banking Division of Credit Suisse in London. From 1991
to 1997, he was a Director at Barclays de Zoete Wedd. From 1991 to 1996, he was Deputy Chairman of the British Hellenic Chamber of Commerce.
He started his career in 1984 as an auditor in Arthur Andersen in Athens. Mr. Megalou holds a Bachelor of Science degree in economics
from the University of Athens and an M.B.A. in finance from Aston University in Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Independence
The Board has determined
that each of Mrs. Kristin H. Holth and Messrs. Sica, Wikborg and Megalou are independent within the current meanings of independence
employed by the corporate governance rules of the NYSE and the SEC.
Committees of the Board
Audit committee
The Company’s audit
committee consists of Ole Wikborg, Christos Megalou, Kristin H. Holth and Frank Sica, as chairman. The Board has determined that Frank
Sica qualifies as an audit committee “financial expert,” as such term is defined in Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC.
The audit committee is responsible for:
|
● |
the
appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of independent auditors and approving any non-audit services performed by such
auditor; |
|
|
|
|
● |
assisting the Board
in monitoring the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the independent auditors’ qualifications and independence,
the performance of the independent accountants and the Company’s internal audit function and the Company’s compliance
with legal and regulatory requirements; |
|
|
|
|
● |
annually reviewing
an independent auditors’ report describing the auditing firm’s internal quality-control procedures, and any material
issues raised by the most recent internal quality control review, or peer review, of the auditing firm; |
|
|
|
|
● |
discussing the annual
audited financial and quarterly statements with management and the independent auditors; |
|
|
|
|
● |
discussing earnings
press releases, as well as financial information and earnings guidance provided to analysts and rating agencies; |
|
● |
discussing policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management; |
|
|
|
|
● |
meeting separately, and periodically, with management, internal auditors and the independent
auditor; |
|
|
|
|
● |
reviewing with the independent auditor any audit problems or difficulties and management’s
responses; |
|
|
|
|
● |
setting clear hiring policies for employees or former employees of the independent
auditors; |
|
|
|
|
● |
annually reviewing the adequacy of the audit committee’s written charter, the
internal audit charter, the scope of the annual internal audit plan and the results of internal audits; |
|
|
|
|
● |
reporting regularly to the full Board; and |
|
|
|
|
● |
handling such other matters that are specifically delegated to the audit committee
by the Board from time to time. |
Corporate governance, nominating and
compensation committee
The Company’s corporate
governance, nominating and compensation committee consists of Christos Megalou, Frank Sica, Kristin H. Holth and Ole Wikborg, as chairman.
The corporate governance, nominating and compensation committee is responsible for:
|
● |
nominating candidates, consistent with criteria approved by the full Board,
for the approval of the full Board to fill Board vacancies as and when they arise, as well as putting in place plans for succession,
in particular, of the Chairman of the Board and executive officers; |
|
|
|
|
● |
selecting, or recommending that the full Board select, the director nominees for the
next annual meeting of stockholders; |
|
|
|
|
● |
determining or administering the Company’s long term incentive plans, including
any equity based plans and grants under such plans; |
|
|
|
|
● |
developing and recommending to the full Board corporate governance guidelines applicable
to the Company and keeping such guidelines under review; |
|
|
|
|
● |
overseeing the evaluation of the Board and management; |
|
|
|
|
● |
reviewing regularly the Board structure, size and composition, taking into account
the importance of a diverse composite mix of ethnicities, ages, gender, race, geographic locations, education and professional skills,
backgrounds and experience, among other characteristics; |
|
|
|
|
● |
maintaining a commitment to supporting, valuing and leveraging diversity in the composition
of the Board among other qualities that the Board believes serve the best interest of the Company and its stakeholders; and |
|
|
|
|
● |
handling such other matters that are specifically delegated to the corporate governance,
nominating and compensation committee by the Board from time to time. |
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE IN
FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED DIRECTORS. UNLESS REVOKED AS PROVIDED ABOVE, PROXIES RECEIVED BY MANAGEMENT WILL BE VOTED IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED
DIRECTORS UNLESS A CONTRARY VOTE IS SPECIFIED.
PROPOSAL TWO
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT
OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Board is submitting for
ratification at the Meeting the appointment of Deloitte, Certified Public Accountants S.A. as the Company’s independent auditors
for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023.
Deloitte, Certified Public
Accountants S.A. has advised the Company that the firm does not have any direct or indirect financial interest in the Company, nor has
such firm had any such interest in connection with the Company during the past three fiscal years other than in its capacity as the Company’s
independent auditors.
All services rendered by
the independent auditors are subject to review by the Company’s audit committee.
Approval of Proposal Two
requires the majority of the votes cast at the Meeting.
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR
RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE, CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS S.A. AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS OF THE COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2023. UNLESS REVOKED AS PROVIDED ABOVE, PROXIES RECEIVED BY MANAGEMENT WILL BE VOTED IN FAVOR OF SUCH APPROVAL
UNLESS A CONTRARY VOTE IS SPECIFIED.
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
Abstentions and broker non-votes
will not affect the election of directors. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote “Against” on the other proposals and
broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of the vote on other proposals.
SOLICITATION
The cost of preparing and
soliciting proxies will be borne by the Company. Solicitation will be made primarily by mail, but stockholders may be solicited by telephone,
e-mail, or personal contact.
OTHER MATTERS
No other matters are expected
to be presented for action at the Meeting. Should any additional matter come before the Meeting, it is intended that proxies in the accompanying
form will be voted in accordance with the judgment of the person or persons named in the proxy.
|
By Order of the Board of Directors |
|
|
|
Dr. Loukas Barmparis
President and Secretary |
July 20, 2023
Monaco
Exhibit 99.2
0 |
|
|
SAFE BULKERS, INC.
THIS PROXY IS BEING SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Proxy card for use at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or any adjournment or postponement thereof (the “Meeting”) of
Safe Bulkers, Inc., a Marshall Islands company (the “Company”), to be held on Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 16:00 local time,
at the Fairmont Hotel, 12 Avenue des Spélugues, Monte Carlo, 98000 Monaco.
The person signing on the reverse of this card, being a holder of shares of common stock of the Company, hereby appoints as
his/her/its proxy at the Meeting, Polys Hajioannou and Konstantinos Adamopoulos, or either one of them acting alone, with
full power of substitution, and directs such proxy to vote (or abstain from voting) at the Meeting all of his, her or its
shares of common stock as indicated on the reverse of this card or, to the extent that no such indication is given, to vote
as set forth herein, and authorizes such proxy to vote in his discretion on such other business as may properly come before
the Meeting.
Please indicate on the reverse of this card how the shares of common stock represented by this proxy are to be voted. If this
card is returned duly signed but without any indication as to how the shares of common stock are to be voted in respect of
any of the resolutions described on the reverse, the stockholder will be deemed to have directed the proxy to vote (1) FOR
the election of all the Class III director nominees to the Board of Directors to hold office for a three-year term until the
annual meeting for the year in which their terms expire and until their successors are duly elected and qualified and (2)
FOR ratification of appointment of Deloitte, Certified Public Accountants S.A. as the Company’s independent auditors for the
year ending December 31, 2023.
(Continued and to be signed on the reverse side.)
|
1.1 |
14475 |
|
2023 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF
SAFE BULKERS, INC.
September 7, 2023
GO GREEN
e-Consent makes it easy to go paperless. With e-Consent, you can quickly access your proxy material, statements and other
eligible documents online, while reducing costs, clutter and paper waste. Enroll today via www.astfinancial.com to enjoy online
access.
NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIAL:
The Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, 2023 Proxy Statement,
Form of Electronic Proxy Card and 2022 Annual Report
are available at http://sb.agmdocuments.com/ASM2023.html
Please sign, date and mail
your proxy card in the
envelope provided as soon
as possible.
|
|
Please detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope provided. |
|
|
|
|
20330000000000000000 9 |
090723 |
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES AND “FOR” PROPOSAL 2.
PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Election of the Class III directors listed below to hold office for a three-year term until the annual meeting for the year
in which their terms expire and until their successors are duly elected and qualified.
|
|
o |
FOR ALL NOMINEES |
NOMINEES:
Konstantinos Adamopoulos
Kristin Holth
Frank Sica
|
|
|
|
|
o |
WITHHOLD AUTHORITY FOR ALL NOMINEES |
|
|
|
|
o |
FOR ALL EXCEPT
(See instructions below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INSTRUCTIONS:
To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “FOR ALL EXCEPT” and fill in the circle
next to each nominee you wish to withhold, as shown here: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address in the address space above.
Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via this method. |
o |
|
FOR |
AGAINST |
ABSTAIN |
2. Ratification of appointment of Deloitte, Certified Public Accountants S.A. as the Company’s independent auditors for the year
ending December 31, 2023. |
o |
o |
o |
|
|
|
|
Note: To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof.
|
|
|
|
|
PLEASE INDICATE WITH AN “X” IN THE APPROPRIATE SPACE HOW YOU WISH YOUR SHARES TO BE VOTED. IF NO INDICATION IS GIVEN, PROXIES
WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF ALL THE NOMINEES TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND FOR PROPOSAL TWO, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
|
Signature of Stockholder |
|
Date: |
|
Signature of Stockholder |
|
Date: |
|
|
Note: |
Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When
signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation,
please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please
sign in partnership name by authorized person. |
|
Exhibit 99.3
M/V Climate Ethics, Japanese Post-Panamax, EEDI-PHASE
3 – IMO NOx TIER III DWT 87,000, delivered January 2023
Safe Bulkers, Inc. is a global
shipping company providing worldwide seaborne transportation trade in the dry bulk sector. We are listed in the New York Stock
Exchange and our shares trade under the symbol “SB”, “SB.PR.C” and “SB.PR.D”.
We, or our managers, have offices in Monaco, Greece, Cyprus and Switzerland.
Our vessels transport major bulks,
which include grain, iron ore, and coal and minor bulks, which include bauxite, fertilizers and steel products. We cooperate with
key market players, shipyards, charterers and financial institutions to advance our business and create value for our shareholders.
Being a successor to a business that first invested in shipping in 1958, we hold true to that legacy with uninterrupted presence
since then, throughout several shipping cycles.
We operate in highly competitive
markets that are based primarily on supply and demand. We believe we differentiate ourselves from our competition by providing
modern vessels with advanced designs and technological specifications. All our vessels are equipped with ballast water treatment
systems and about half with sulphur oxides exhaust gas cleaning devices. We have an extensive newbuild and an investment program
for upgrading our existing fleet, targeting to gradually renew our fleet and reduce our environmental impact. The majority of our
fleet has been built in Japanese shipyards for our Company’s account, which we believe provides us with operational and environmental
advantages, including the ability to attract large, well-established customers and have improved energy efficiency and relatively
lower green house gas footprint.
We intend to employ our vessels
on both period time charters and spot time charters, according to our assessment of market conditions, with some of the world’s
largest consumers of marine drybulk transportation services. The vessels we deploy on period time charters provide us with relatively
stable cash flow and high utilization rates, while the vessels we deploy in the spot market allow us to maintain our flexibility
in all charter market conditions.
Our fleet consists of dry bulk
vessels of four sizes, namely Capesize vessels with carrying capacity of about 180,000 deadweight ton (“dwt”) expressed
in metric tons, referring to the maximum weight of cargo and supplies that a vessel can carry; Post Panamax vessels with carrying
capacities of between 85,000 dwt and 100,000 dwt; Kamsarmax vessels with carrying capacities of between 80,000 dwt and 84,000 dwt;
and Panamax vessels with carrying capacities of between 75,000 and 78,000 dwt.
As of February 24, 2023, our
fleet consisted of 44 vessels, with an average age of 10.5 years and an aggregate capacity of 4.5 million dwt, 12 vessels being
eco-ships built after 2014, with superior energy efficiency characteristics compared to past-2014 designs, and three vessels built
2022 onwards compliant with the most recent IMO GHG Phase 3 - NOx Tier III regulations. In addition, our outstanding orderbook
consisted of nine newbuilds compliant with the IMO GHG Phase 3 - NOx Tier III regulations to be delivered four in 2023, three in
2024 and two in the first half of 2025.
During the last two years, we
sold eight vessels of $125.7 million sale proceeds, 0.63 million dwt and 14.6 years average age and acquired seven second-hand
vessels of $187.0 million acquisition cost, 0.97 million dwt and 9.2 years average age. In parallel, we completed environmental
upgrades on seven vessels and we are continuing our vessel environmental upgrade program which involves application of low friction
paints and installation of energy saving devices, scheduling to have upgraded 20 existing vessels by the end of 2023.
On the financing front, during
the last two years, we were one of the first shipping companies which secured two sustainability-linked financings with separate
lenders, of $160.0 million for 11 of our vessels, in aggregate, both of which incorporated incentive discount or increase on interest
rate, linked to independently verified predetermined emission targets.
We believe that by placing ESG
to the very heart of our corporate strategy will, reduce our fleets’ carbon footprint and environmental impact and in parallel,
improve our environmental based competitiveness and social acceptance, continue to enjoy investors’ trust and enable us to
reinforce our access to capital.
We aim to maintain a comfortable
leveraged balance sheet with strong liquidity, directing our free cash flows partially to our investment program and partially
to reward our shareholders.
In February 2023, we declared
a cash dividend of $0.05 per share of common stock which was paid on March 17, 2023 to shareholders of record on March 1, 2023.
Our future liquidity needs will impact our dividend policy. The declaration and payment of dividends, if any, will always be subject
to the discretion of the Board of Directors of the Company. There is no guarantee that the Company’s Board of Directors will
determine to issue cash dividends in the future. The timing and amount of any dividends declared will depend on, among other things:
(i) the Company’s earnings, fleet employment profile, financial condition and cash requirements and available sources of
liquidity; (ii) decisions in relation to the Company’s growth, fleet renewal and leverage strategies; (iii) provisions of
Marshall Islands and Liberian law governing the payment of dividends; (iv) restrictive covenants in the Company’s existing
and future debt instruments; and (v) global economic and financial conditions. In addition, cash dividends on our Common Stock
are subject to the priority of dividends on our Preferred Shares.
|
|
|
Polys Hajioannou is our Chief Executive Officer
and has been Chairman of our board of directors since 2008. |
Fellow Shareholders,
Last year has been very challenging
as geopolitical tensions, the war in Ukraine, and global energy uncertainties ignited inflation, but Safe Bulkers had a very good
year. Our revenues reached $350 million, achieving an EPS of $1.36, with a liquidity and capital resources of $346 million as of
February 24, 2023, providing us with the financial flexibility we require. Throughout the year we maintained a meaningful dividend
policy of five cents per quarter, retaining a portion of our free cash flows for our investments which are designed to improve
our competitiveness in the evolving environment of emissions regulations.
Targeting to reduce the environmental
impact of our operations, and increase the sustainability of our business over time, we have placed ESG in the heart of our corporate
strategy and undertaken significant investments with the purpose of increasing our fleet’s environmental competitiveness
and successfully meet society’s expectations as to our proper role.
In light of investors’
increased focus on ESG matters and in response to the GHG environmental regulations, we have assessed the applicability of relevant
energy efficiency measures, and decided to pursue a twofold strategy: i) a comprehensive fleet renewal program consisting of several
newbuild orders with advanced energy efficiency characteristics, the acquisition of younger second-hand vessels and the sale of
older less efficient at suitable times and ii) a program for environmental upgrading of existing vessels in our fleet during their
dry-dockings.
As a result, Safe Bulkers by
early 2025 will have 24 vessels with improved energy efficiency characteristics, either eco-ships built after 2014 or IMO GHG Phase
3 - NOx Tier III compliant built after 2022 onwards. We also expect to upgrade 20 existing vessels by the end of this year which
will increase their competitiveness due to improved energy efficiency and lower fuel consumption. In parallel we have expanded
our Scrubber program to cover all our Capes size class vessels which provides additional operational and commercial benefits due
to substantial price differential between the high and the low sulphur content fuel, while we have completed the retrofit of ballast
water treatment to all our existing vessels.
Having invested in newbuilds,
relatively young second-hand vessels and environmental upgrades, we continue to monitor technological developments in relation
to new environmentally friendly alternative marine fuels, which we expect will play an increasingly important role in the next
decade.
On the financing front, during
the last two years, we were one of the first shipping companies which secured two sustainability-linked financings, which incorporated
incentive discount or increase on interest rate, linked to independently verified predetermined emission targets. Furthermore,
mitigating the risk of increased interest rates worldwide we issued an unsecured five year Eurobond of one hundred million listed
in the Athens Stock Exchange with a 2.95% fixed coupon, representing about one fourth of our debt.
While as company, we are prepared
for all market conditions with comfortable leverage, substantial liquidity and hands on operational efficiency, ready to assess
new opportunities, we remain cautiously optimistic for the future prospects of the market. With a relatively low dry-bulk orderbook
the next two years we rely on global developments and increase of demand for dry-bulk transportation services associated with it.
Our Company is aiming to create
value for our shareholders, competing on the basis of improved environmental performance as new regulations, restrictions and taxation
are being introduced.
We would like to thank all our
stockholders for their continued support and interest in our company and proudly present the 2022 Annual Report which provides
detailed information about our business and financial performance.
|
Polys V. Hajioannou |
|
Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Board |
|
|
|
|
Operational
highlights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
M/V Vassos, Japanese Kamsarmax,
EEDI-PHASE 3 – IMO NOx TIER III DWT 82,000,
delivered May 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
M/V Climate Respect, Japanese Post-Panamax,
EEDI-PHASE 3 – IMO NOx TIER III DWT 87,000,
delivered July 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial highlights(*) |
|
(*)
Definitions
Time charter
equivalent rate, or TCE rate, represents charter revenues less commissions and voyage expenses divided by the number of
available days.
EBITDA
represents Net income plus net interest expense, tax, depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA represents EBITDA
before gain/(loss) on derivatives, early redelivery cost/(gain), other operating cost, gain on sale of assets and gain/(loss)
on foreign currency.
Earnings/(loss)
per share (“EPS”) and Adjusted Earnings/(loss) per share (“Adjusted EPS”)
represent Net income/(loss) and Adjusted Net income/(loss) less preferred dividend and mezzanine equity measurement divided
by the weighted average number of shares respectively.
EBITDA,
Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Income/ (loss), Adjusted Net income/(loss) available to common shareholders, Earnings/(loss)
per share and Adjusted Earnings/(loss) per share are not recognized measurements under US GAAP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel Name |
Dwt |
Year Built* |
Country of Construction |
CURRENT FLEET |
Panamax |
|
|
|
Katerina |
76,000 |
2004 |
Japan |
Maritsa |
76,000 |
2005 |
Japan |
Paraskevi 2 |
75,000 |
2011 |
Japan |
Efrossini |
75,000 |
2012 |
Japan |
Zoe |
75,000 |
2013 |
Japan |
Koulitsa 2 |
78,100 |
2013 |
Japan |
Kypros Land |
77,100 |
2014 |
Japan |
Kypros Sea |
77,100 |
2014 |
Japan |
Kypros Bravery |
78,000 |
2015 |
Japan |
Kypros Sky |
77,100 |
2015 |
Japan |
Kypros Loyalty |
78,000 |
2015 |
Japan |
Kypros Spirit |
78,000 |
2016 |
Japan |
Kamsarmax |
|
|
|
Pedhoulas Merchant |
82,300 |
2006 |
Japan |
Pedhoulas Leader |
82,300 |
2007 |
Japan |
Pedhoulas Commander |
83,700 |
2008 |
Japan |
Pedhoulas Cherry |
82,000 |
2015 |
China |
Pedhoulas Rose |
82,000 |
2017 |
China |
Pedhoulas Cedrus |
81,800 |
2018 |
Japan |
Vassos |
82,000 |
2022 |
Japan |
Post-Panamax |
|
|
|
Marina |
87,000 |
2006 |
Japan |
Xenia |
87,000 |
2006 |
Japan |
Sophia |
87,000 |
2007 |
Japan |
Eleni |
87,000 |
2008 |
Japan |
Martine |
87,000 |
2009 |
Japan |
Andreas K |
92,000 |
2009 |
South Korea |
Panayiota K |
92,000 |
2010 |
South Korea |
Agios Spyridonas |
92,000 |
2010 |
South Korea |
Venus Heritage |
95,800 |
2010 |
Japan |
Vessel Name |
Dwt |
Year Built* |
Country of Construction |
Venus History |
95,800 |
2011 |
Japan |
Venus Horizon |
95,800 |
2012 |
Japan |
Venus Harmony |
95,700 |
2013 |
Japan |
Troodos Sun |
85,000 |
2016 |
Japan |
Troodos Air |
85,000 |
2016 |
Japan |
Troodos Oak |
85,000 |
2020 |
Japan |
Climate Respect |
87,000 |
2022 |
Japan |
Climate Ethics |
87,000 |
2023 |
Japan |
Capesize |
|
|
|
Mount Troodos |
181,400 |
2009 |
Japan |
Kanaris |
178,100 |
2010 |
China |
Pelopidas |
176,000 |
2011 |
China |
Aghia Sofia |
176,000 |
2012 |
China |
Michalis H |
180,400 |
2012 |
China |
Stelios Y |
181,400 |
2012 |
Japan |
Maria |
181,300 |
2014 |
Japan |
Lake Despina |
181,400 |
2014 |
Japan |
TOTAL |
4,455,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEW
BUILDS |
Kamsarmax |
|
|
|
TBN** |
82,000 |
Q4 2023 |
Japan |
TBN** |
82,000 |
Q4 2023 |
Japan |
TBN** |
82,000 |
Q4 2023 |
Japan |
TBN** |
82,000 |
Q1 2024 |
Japan |
TBN** |
82,000 |
Q1 2024 |
Japan |
TBN** |
82,500 |
Q3 2024 |
China |
TBN** |
82,500 |
Q1 2025 |
China |
TBN** |
82,000 |
Q2 2025 |
Japan |
Post-Panamax |
|
|
|
TBN** |
87,000 |
Q2 2023 |
Japan |
TOTAL |
744,000 |
|
|
|
* |
For existing vessels, the year represents the year built. For newbuilds, the dates shown reflect the expected delivery dates. |
|
** |
To be Named. |
|
United states
Securities and exchange
commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form 20-F |
(Mark One) |
|
o |
Registration statement pursuant to Section 12(b) or (g) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 |
x |
Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 |
o |
Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
o |
Shell Company Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
Commission File Number 001-34077
|
|
Safe Bulkers, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
Not Applicable
(Translation of Registrant’s
name into English)
Republic of the Marshall Islands
(Jurisdiction of incorporation
or organization)
Safe Bulkers, Inc.
Apt. D11
Les Acanthes
6, Avenue des Citronniers
MC98000 Monaco
(Address of principal executive office)
Dr. Loukas Barmparis
President
Telephone: +30 2 111 888 400
Telephone: +357 25 887 200
Facsimile: +30 2 111 878 500
(Name, Address, Telephone Number and Facsimile Number of Company contact person)
Securities registered or to
be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title of Each Class |
|
Trading
Symbol(s) |
|
Name of Each Exchange
on Which Registered |
Common Stock, $0.001 par value
per share |
|
SB |
|
New York
Stock Exchange |
Preferred stock purchase rights |
|
N/A |
|
New York
Stock Exchange |
8.00% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares, par value $0.01 per share,
liquidation preference $25.00 per share |
|
SB.PR.C |
|
New York Stock Exchange |
8.00% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares, par value $0.01 per share,
liquidation preference $25.00 per share |
|
SB.PR.D |
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of
the Act: None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation
pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each
of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report. As of December
31, 2022, there were 118,868,317 shares of the registrant’s common stock, 804,950 shares of 8.00% Series C Cumulative Redeemable
Perpetual Preferred Shares, $0.01 par value per share, liquidation preference $25.00 per share, and 3,195,050 shares of 8.00% Series
D Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares, $0.01 par value per share, liquidation preference $25.00 per share, outstanding.
Indicate by check mark if the
registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x
If this report is an annual or transition
report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x
No o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405
of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether
the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an “emerging
growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large
accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated
filer x Emerging growth company o
If an emerging growth company that prepares
its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended
transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a)
of the Exchange Act. o
† The term “new or revised financial
accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards
Codification after April 5, 2012.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial
reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared
or issued its audit report. x
If securities are registered pursuant
to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect
the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. o
Indicate by check mark whether any of
those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive based compensation received by any of the
registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). o
Indicate by check mark which basis
of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing. U.S. GAAP x International
Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board o
Other o
If “Other” has been
checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has
elected to follow. Item 17 o Item
18 o
If this is an annual report, indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
o No x
Table of contents
In this annual report, “Safe
Bulkers,” “the Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” are sometimes used for convenience
where references are made to Safe Bulkers, Inc. and its subsidiaries (as well as the predecessors of the foregoing). These expressions
are also used where no useful purpose is served by identifying the particular company or companies. Our affiliated management companies,
Safety Management Overseas S.A., a company incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Panama (“Safety Management”),
and Safe Bulkers Management Limited, a company organized and existing under the laws of the Republic of Cyprus (“Safe Bulkers
Management”), are each sometimes referred to as a “Manager,”. Safe Bulkers Management Monaco Inc., a company
incorporated under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands (“Safe Bulkers Management Monaco”) is sometimes
referred to as the “New Manager,” and together with Safety Management and Safe Bulkers Management, our “Managers.”
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS |
|
All statements in this annual
report that are not statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United
States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The disclosure and analysis set forth in this annual report includes assumptions,
expectations, projections, intentions and beliefs about future events in a number of places, particularly in relation to our operations,
cash flows, financial position, plans, strategies, business prospects, changes and trends in our business and the markets in which
we operate. These statements are intended as forward-looking statements. In some cases, predictive, future-tense or forward-looking
words such as “believe,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “continue,” “possible,”
“hope,” “estimate,” “project,” “predict,” “forecast,” “plan,”
“target,” “seek,” “potential,” “may,” “might,” “will,”
“likely to,” “would,” “could,” “should” and “expect” and other similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements.
In addition, we and our representatives may from time to time make other oral or written statements which are forward-looking statements,
including in our periodic reports that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), other information
sent to our security holders, and other written materials.
All forward-looking statements
involve risks and uncertainties. The occurrence of the events described, and the achievement of the expected results, depend on
many events, some or all of which are not predictable or within our control. Actual results may differ materially from expected
results.
Forward-looking statements include,
but are not limited to, such matters as:
|
~ |
future operating or financial results and future revenues and
expenses; |
|
~ |
future, pending or recent acquisitions, business strategy, and
other plans and objectives for growth and future operations, areas of possible expansion and expected capital spending or
operating expenses; |
|
~ |
availability of key employees, crew, length and number of off-hire
days, classification surveys and drydocking requirements, and bunker fuel prices and insurance costs for our fleet; |
|
~ |
general market conditions and changes, including inflation pressures
leading to subpar economic growth, and the disruption of shipping routes and seaborne patterns in the shipping industry trends,
including charter rates, vessel values and factors affecting supply and demand for dry bulk commodities; |
|
~ |
competition within our industry; |
|
~ |
reputational risks; |
|
~ |
our financial condition and liquidity, including our ability
to make required payments under our credit facilities, comply with our loan covenants and obtain additional financing in the
future to fund capital expenditures, acquisitions and other corporate activities and to comply with the restrictive and other
covenants in our financing arrangements; |
|
~ |
the strength of world economies and currencies and the fluctuations
in interest rates and foreign exchange rates; |
|
~ |
potential exposure or loss from investment in derivative instruments; |
|
~ |
general domestic and international political conditions; |
|
~ |
the effect of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (the “Covid-19”)
on our business and operations and any related remediation measures on our performance and business prospects; |
|
~ |
the extent to which any new wave or new variant of Covid-19 will
impact the Company’s results of operations and financial condition; |
|
~ |
potential disruption of shipping routes due to natural disasters,
accidents, political events or other developments outside of our control, including the war between Russia and Ukraine and
the extent to which such events could have any impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition; |
|
~ |
sanctions imposed as a result of war (including the war between
Russia and Ukraine), and the potential impact on our common shares and reputation if our vessels were to call on ports located
in countries that are subject to restrictions imposed by the U.S. and other governments; |
|
~ |
the overall health and condition of the U.S. and global financial
markets, including the value of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies; |
|
~ |
our expectations about availability of vessels to purchase, the
time that it may take to construct and deliver new vessels or the useful lives of our vessels; |
|
~ |
the number of available slots in shipyards for newbuilding orders
for the dry bulk sector; |
|
~ |
our ability to successfully acquire, dispose and implement a
gradual fleet renewal with modern, energy efficient vessels; |
|
~ |
our continued ability to enter into period time charters with
our customers and secure profitable employment for our vessels in the spot market; |
|
~ |
vessel breakdowns and instances of off-hire; |
|
|
|
|
~ |
our future capital expenditures (including our ability to successfully complete current and future newbuilding programs, the remaining installation of sulfur oxide exhaust gas cleaning systems (“Scrubbers”) and investments for the upgrading of our existing vessels (including the amount and nature thereof, the timing of completion thereof, the delivery and commencement of operations dates, the expected downtime delays, cost overruns and lost revenue); |
|
~ |
our ability to continue realizing the benefits from Scrubbers; |
|
~ |
availability of financing and refinancing, our level of indebtedness and our need for cash to meet our debt service obligations; |
|
~ |
our expectations relating to dividend payments and ability to make such payments; |
|
~ |
our ability to leverage our Managers’ relationships and reputation within the drybulk shipping industry to our advantage; |
|
~ |
our anticipated general and administrative expenses; |
|
~ |
potential conflicts of interest involving our Chief Executive Officer, his family and other members of our senior management and board of directors; |
|
~ |
environmental and regulatory conditions, including changes in laws, governmental rules and regulations or actions taken by regulatory authorities; |
|
~ |
our ability to manage and mitigate any reduction in the demand for coal, one of the primary cargoes carried by our vessels; |
|
~ |
our ability to implement and maintain adequate environmental and social responsibility policies and programs at an increasing scrutiny and expectations from investors, lenders, charterers with respect to our Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) practices; |
|
~ |
risks inherent in vessel operation, including terrorism (including cyber terrorism), piracy corruption, militant activities, political instability, terrorism and ethnic unrest in locations where we may operate and discharge of pollutants; |
|
~ |
potential liability from pending or future litigation and potential costs due to environmental damage and vessel collisions; and |
|
~ |
other factors discussed in “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors” of this annual report. |
See the sections entitled “Risk
Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2022.
We caution that the forward-looking
statements included in this annual report represent our estimates, analyses formed by applying our experience and perception of
historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors we believe are appropriate in the circumstances
and assumptions only as of the date of this annual report and are not intended to give any assurance as to future results. All
future written and verbal forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified
in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. We undertake no obligation, and specifically
decline any obligation, except as required by law, to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result
of new information, future events or otherwise. Assumptions, expectations, projections, intentions and beliefs about future events
may, and often do, vary from actual results and these differences can be material. The reasons for this include the risks, uncertainties
and factors described under “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors.” which we urge you to read for a more complete
discussion of these risks and uncertainties and for other risks and uncertainties. As a result and in light of these risks, uncertainties
and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this annual report might not occur and our actual results may differ materially
from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. Accordingly, you should not unduly rely on any forward-looking statements.
We undertake no obligation, and
specifically decline any obligation, to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements contained in this annual report,
except as required by law, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, a change in our views or expectations
or otherwise. These factors and the other risk factors described in this annual report are not necessarily all of the important
factors that could cause actual results or developments to differ materially from those expressed in any of our forward-looking
statements. Other unknown or unpredictable factors could also cause such discrepancies. New factors emerge from time to time, and
it is not possible for us to predict all of these factors. Further, we cannot assess the impact of each such factor on our business
or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to be materially different from those contained
in any forward-looking statement. Consequently, there can be no assurance that actual results or developments anticipated by us
will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the expected consequences to, or effects on, us. Given
these uncertainties, prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. in any
of our forward-looking statements. Unless otherwise indicated, all references to “U.S. dollars”,“Dollars”,
“U.S. $” and “$” in this report are to U.S. Dollars, the lawful currency of the United States of America
(the “U.S.”) and all references to “Euro” and “€” in this report are to Euros, the official
currency of certain member states of the European Union (the “E.U.”). The consolidated financial statements and notes
of Safe Bulkers, Inc., have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”).
The historical results included elsewhere in this document are not necessarily indicative of our future performance.
|
|
PART I |
|
|
|
ITEM 1.
IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS |
|
Not applicable. |
|
|
|
ITEM 2.
OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE |
|
Not applicable. |
|
|
|
ITEM 3.
KEY INFORMATION |
|
Safe Bulkers, Inc., was formed
on December 11, 2007 under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands. Safe Bulkers’ common stock trades on the New
York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “SB”. The Company’s series C preferred stock and series
D preferred stock are listed on the NYSE, and trade under the symbols “SB.PR.C” and “SB.PR.D”, respectively.
We are a global shipping company providing worldwide seaborne transportation solutions in the dry bulk sector. Our vessels transport
major bulks, which include iron ore, coal and grain and minor bulks, which include bauxite, fertilizers and steel products. We
or our Managers have offices in Monaco, Greece, Cyprus and Switzerland. Our fleet consists of dry bulk vessels of four sizes, namely
Capesize vessels with carrying capacity of about 180,000 dwt; Post Panamax vessels with carrying capacities of between 85,000 dwt
and 100,000 dwt; Kamsarmax vessels with carrying capacities of between 80,000 dwt and 84,000 dwt; and Panamax vessels with carrying
capacities of between 75,000 and 78,000 dwt. As of February 24, 2023, we have a fleet of 44 vessels, with an average age of 10.5
years and aggregate capacity of 4.5 million deadweight tons (“dwt”) expressed in metric tons, each of which is equivalent
to 1,000 kilograms, referring to the maximum weight of cargo and supplies that a vessel can carry. In addition, we have entered
into agreements for the acquisition of seven Japanese dry-bulk newbuilds of which six are Kamsarmax class vessels and one is a
Post-Panamax class vessel and of two Chinese Kamsarmax class newbuild vessels. All nine newbuilds on the Company’s orderbook
are designed to meet the Phase 3 requirements of Energy Efficiency Design Index related to the reduction of green house gas emissions
(“GHG -EEDI Phase 3”) as adopted by the International Maritime Organization, (“IMO”) and
also comply with the latest NOx emissions regulation, NOx-Tier III (IMO, MARPOL Annex VI, reg. 13) (“NOx-Tier III”).
Four newbuilds on the Company’s orderbook are scheduled to be delivered in 2023, of which three are Kamsarmax class and one
is a Post-Panamax class vessel, followed by three newbuilds scheduled to be delivered in 2024 and two newbuilds scheduled to be
delivered in the first half of 2025.
(A) Reserved |
|
|
|
(B) Capitalization and Indebtedness |
|
Not
applicable. |
|
|
|
(C) Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds |
|
Not
applicable. |
|
|
|
(D) Risk Factors |
|
SOME OF THE FOLLOWING RISKS RELATE
PRINCIPALLY TO THE INDUSTRY IN WHICH WE OPERATE AND OUR BUSINESS IN GENERAL. OTHER RISKS RELATE PRINCIPALLY TO THE SECURITIES MARKET
AND OWNERSHIP OF OUR COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE PER SHARE (“COMMON STOCK”), SERIES C CUMULATIVE REDEEMABLE PERPETUAL
PREFERRED SHARES, PAR VALUE $0.01 PER SHARE, LIQUIDATION PREFERENCE $25.00 PER SHARE (“SERIES C PREFERRED SHARES”)
AND SERIES D CUMULATIVE REDEEMABLE PERPETUAL PREFERRED SHARES, PAR VALUE $0.01 PER SHARE, LIQUIDATION PREFERENCE $25.00 PER SHARE
(“SERIES D PREFERRED SHARES,” AND TOGETHER WITH THE SERIES C PREFERRED SHARES, THE “PREFERRED SHARES”),
INCLUDING THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF OWNERSHIP OF OUR COMMON STOCK AND PREFERRED SHARES. THE OCCURRENCE OF ANY OF THE RISKS OR EVENTS
DESCRIBED IN THIS SECTION COULD SIGNIFICANTLY AND NEGATIVELY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS, FINANCIAL CONDITION OR OPERATING RESULTS OR THE
TRADING PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK OR PREFERRED SHARES.
Risk Factor Summary
Investing in our securities involves
a high degree of risk. Below is a summary of material factors that make an investment in our securities speculative or risky. Importantly,
this summary does not address all of the risks that we face. Additional discussion of the risks summarized in this risk factor
summary, as well as other risks that we face, can be found after this summary.
Risks Inherent in Our Industry and Our Business
|
~ |
Cyclicality and volatility may lead to reductions in the charter rates we are able to obtain, in vessel values and in our earnings, results of operations and available cash flow. |
|
~ |
A negative change in global economic or regulatory conditions could reduce charter rates. |
|
~ |
An oversupply of drybulk vessel capacity may lead to reductions in charter rates and results of operations. |
|
~ |
The market value of drybulk vessels is highly volatile. A decrease of the market values of our vessels could cause us to incur an impairment loss and have an adverse effect on our results of operations. |
|
~ |
Drybulk industry is competitive, and we may not be able to compete successfully for charters with new entrants or established companies with greater resources. |
|
~ |
We are subject to complex regulations and liability, including anti-bribery, labor, environmental, international safety and anti-corruption laws that may require significant expenditures. |
|
~ |
Our vessels fitted with Scrubbers may face difficulties from the price differential between compliant fuels with 0.5% sulfur content (“VLSFO”) and heavy fuel oil with sulfur content of 3.5% (“HSFO”) and the regulatory restrictions and shortage in availability of HSFO, while our non–scrubber fitted vessels may face difficulties in competing with Scrubber-fitted vessels and incur additional repairs and maintenance costs, affecting our results of operations. |
|
~ |
Environmental regulations in relation to climate change and green house gas (“GHG”) emissions may increase operational and financial restrictions and environmental compliance costs and lead to environmental taxation schemes affecting more less energy efficient vessels, reducing their trade and competitiveness and make certain vessels in our fleet obsolete, which may result in financial impacts on our results of operations. |
|
~ |
Increasing scrutiny and changing expectations from investors, lenders with respect to our ESG policies may impose additional costs or expose us to additional risks. |
|
~ |
Increased inspection procedures and tighter import and export controls could increase costs and disrupt our business. |
|
~ |
Our vessels are exposed to operational risks that may not be adequately covered by our insurance. |
|
~ |
World events, including terrorist attacks, international hostilities and potential disruption of shipping routes due to events outside of our control, including the war between Russia and Ukraine, could negatively affect our results of operations. |
|
~ |
The outbreaks of epidemic and pandemic diseases, including the Covid-19 and the resulting disruptions to the Company and the international shipping industry have, and could continue to negatively affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. |
|
~ |
Acts of piracy and world events, including terrorist attacks and hostilities, could negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition. |
|
~ |
We rely on information technology, and if we are unable to protect against service interruptions, data corruption, cyber based attacks or network security breaches, our operations could be disrupted and our business negatively affected. |
|
~ |
Certain operational and technical risks of drybulk vessels could lead to an environmental disaster, affecting our business. |
|
~ |
Political uncertainty and an increase in trade protectionism could have a negative impact on our charterers’ business. |
|
~ |
Charterers may renegotiate
or default on period time charters, which could reduce our revenues. |
|
~ |
The loss of one or more
of our customers could have a material adverse effect on our business. |
|
~ |
We may have difficulty properly managing our planned growth through acquisitions of additional vessels. |
|
~ |
Failure to improve our operations and financial systems or recruit suitable employees as we expand our business, may affect our performance. |
|
~ |
Unless we set aside reserves for vessel replacement, at the end of a vessel’s useful life, our revenue will decline, which would adversely affect our cash flows and income. |
|
~ |
The smuggling of drugs or other contraband onto our vessels may lead to governmental claims against us. |
|
~ |
If we are unable to obtain additional financing on favorable terms, we may be unable to refinance our existing indebtedness and may not be able to finance a fleet replacement and expansion program in the future. |
|
~ |
Conversion of our London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) based borrowings to alternative reference rates, such as the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”), could result in higher interest costs, and may adversely impact our indebtedness. |
|
~ |
Inflation pressures and the rise in central bank rates could lead to contraction for world economies and adversely affect dry-bulk world trade and freight markets, the cost of our capital, and may adversely impact our revenues and our indebtedness. |
|
~ |
We are and will be exposed to floating interest rates and may selectively enter into interest rate derivative contracts, which can result in higher than market interest rates and charges against our income. |
|
~ |
Because we generate substantially all of our revenues in U.S. dollars but incur a material portion of our expenses in other currencies, exchange rate fluctuations could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. |
|
~ |
Restrictive covenants and cross-default provisions in our existing and future financing agreements impose financial and other restrictions on us, and any breach of these covenants could result in the acceleration of our indebtedness and foreclosure on our vessels. |
|
~ |
The declaration and payment of dividends will always be subject to the discretion of our board of directors and our board of directors may not declare dividends in the future. |
|
~ |
We are a holding company and we depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to distribute funds to us in order to make dividend payments. |
|
~ |
We depend on our Managers to operate our business and our business could be harmed if our Managers fail to perform their services satisfactorily. |
|
~ |
Our chief executive officer also controls our Managers, which could create conflicts of interest between us and our Managers. |
|
~ |
Agreements between us and other affiliated entities may be challenged as less favorable than agreements that we could |
obtain from unaffiliated third parties.
|
~ |
The provisions in our restrictive covenant arrangements with our chief executive officer and certain entities affiliated with him restricting their ability to compete with us may not be enforceable. |
|
~ |
We are incorporated in the Republic of the Marshall Islands, which does not have a well-developed body of corporate law. |
Risks Relating to Our Common
Stock and Preferred Shares
|
~ |
Our chief executive officer Polys Hajioannou is the Company’s largest shareholder and his interests may be different from yours. |
|
~ |
Our status as a foreign private issuer within the rules promulgated under the Exchange Act exempts us from certain requirements of the SEC and NYSE. |
|
~ |
The market price of our Common Stock may be adversely affected by sales of substantial amounts of our Common Stock pursuant to our at the market equity offering program (the “ATM Program”). |
|
|
Risks Inherent in Our Industry and Our Business |
|
The international drybulk
shipping industry is cyclical and volatile, having reached historical highs in 2008 and historical lows in 2016. Charter rates
improved during 2021, remained at elevated levels during 2022 and have recently decreased. Cyclicality and volatility may lead
to reductions in the charter rates we are able to obtain, in vessel values and in our earnings, results of operations and available
cash flow.
The drybulk shipping industry
is cyclical with attendant volatility in charter rates, vessel values and profitability. The industry is cyclical in nature due
to seasonal fluctuations, market adjustments in supply of and demand for drybulk vessels and trade disruptions. We expect this
cyclicality and volatility in market rates to continue in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the
drybulk charter market will reach in the near future the levels previously experienced. The market could experience a downturn
in case of a new wave of Covid-19, or as a result of the war between Russia and Ukraine, or for other reasons. For example, in
2008, the Baltic Dry Index (the “BDI”), had reached an all-time high of 11,793, while in 2016, BDI had reached an all-time
low of 290. During 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, BDI remained volatile, reaching an annual low of 595 in February 2019 and
an annual high of 2,518 in September 2019 for 2019, an annual low of 393 in May 2020 and an annual high of 2,097 in October 2020
for 2020, an annual low of 1,303 in February 2021 and an annual high of 5,650 in October 2021, an annual low of 965 on August 31,
2022 and an annual high of 3,369 on May 23, 2022, and a low of 530 on February 16, 2023 and a high of 1,250 on January 3, 2023,
thus far in 2023.
We charter some of our vessels
in the spot charter market for periods up to three months and in the period charter market for longer periods. The spot market
is highly competitive and volatile, while period time charter contracts of longer duration provide income at pre-determined rates
over more extended periods of time. We are exposed to changes in spot charter market each time one of our vessels is completing
a previously contracted charter, and we may not be able to secure period time charters at profitable levels. Furthermore, we may
be unable to keep our vessels fully employed. Charter rates available in the market may be insufficient to enable our vessels to
be operated profitably. A significant decrease in charter rates would adversely affect our profitability, cash flows, asset values
and ability to pay dividends.
As of February 24, 2023, 24 of
our 44 drybulk vessels were deployed or scheduled to be deployed on period time charters of more than three months remaining term.
In addition, we have entered into agreements for the acquisition of seven Japanese and two Chinese dry-bulk GHG-EEDI Phase 3 NOx-Tier
III newbuilds, scheduled to be delivered four in 2023, three in 2024 and two in the first half of 2025. None of the newbuilds on
order currently have any contracted charter. As more vessels become available for employment, we may have difficulty entering into
multi-year, fixed-rate time charters for our vessels, and as a result, our cash flows may be subject to volatility in the long-term.
We may be required to enter into variable rate charters or charters linked to the Baltic Panamax Index or Baltic Capesize Index,
as opposed to contracts based on fixed rates, which could result in a decrease in our cash flows and net income in periods when
the market for drybulk shipping is depressed. If low charter rates in the drybulk market prevail during periods when we must replace
our existing charters, it will have an adverse effect on our revenues, profitability, cash flows and our ability to comply with
the financial covenants in our loan and credit facilities.
The factors affecting the supply
and demand for drybulk vessels are outside of our control and are difficult to predict with confidence. As a result, the nature,
timing, direction and degree of changes in industry conditions are also unpredictable.
Factors that influence demand
for drybulk vessel capacity include:
|
~ |
demand for and production of drybulk products; |
|
~ |
supply of and demand for energy resources and commodities; |
|
~ |
Covid-19 and related factors; |
|
~ |
global and regional economic and political conditions, pandemics such as Covid-19, armed conflicts such as the war between Russia and Ukraine, natural or other disasters (including weather conditions), terrorist activities and strikes; |
|
~ |
sanctions imposed as a result of war (including the war between Russia and Ukraine); |
|
~ |
environmental, climate and other regulatory developments; |
|
~ |
the location of regional and global exploration, production and manufacturing facilities and the distance drybulk cargoes are to be moved by sea; |
|
~ |
changes in seaborne and other transportation patterns including shifts in the location of consuming regions for energy resources, commodities, and transportation demand for drybulk transportation; |
|
~ |
international sanctions, embargoes, import and export restrictions, nationalizations and wars, including those arising as a result of the war between Russia and Ukraine; |
|
|
|
|
~ |
trade disputes or the imposition of tariffs on various commodities or finished goods tariffs on imports and exports that could affect the international trade; and |
|
~ |
currency exchange rates. |
Factors that influence the supply
of drybulk vessel capacity include:
|
~ |
the size of the newbuilding orderbook; |
|
~ |
availability of financing for new vessels; |
|
~ |
the number of newbuild deliveries, including slippage in deliveries, which, among other factors, relates to the ability of shipyards to deliver newbuilds by contracted delivery dates and the ability of purchasers to finance such newbuilds; |
|
~ |
the scrapping rate of older vessels, depending, amongst other things, on scrapping rates and international scrapping regulations; |
|
~ |
Covid-19 and related factors, including port lockdowns, higher crew cost and travel restrictions imposed by governments around the world; |
|
~ |
port and canal congestion; |
|
~ |
the speed of vessel operation which may be influenced by several reasons including energy cost and environmental regulations; |
|
~ |
sanctions; |
|
~ |
the number of vessels that are in or out of service, delayed in ports for several reasons, laid-up, dry docked awaiting repairs or otherwise not available for hire, including due to vessel casualties; |
|
~ |
changes in environmental and other regulations that may limit the useful lives of vessels or effectively cause reductions in the carrying capacity of vessels or early obsolescence of tonnage; and |
|
~ |
ability of the Company to maintain ESG practices acceptable to customers, regulators and financing sources. |
Factors influencing the supply
of and demand for shipping capacity are outside of our control, and we may not be able to correctly assess the nature, timing and
degree of changes in industry conditions. We anticipate that the future demand for our drybulk vessels and, in turn, drybulk charter
rates, will be dependent, among other things, upon economic growth in the world’s economies, seasonal and regional changes
in demand, changes in the capacity of the global drybulk vessel fleet and the sources and supply of drybulk cargo to be transported
by sea. However, new factors may emerge which we cannot foresee at this time and thus might not be able to adequately prepare for.
A decline in demand for commodities transported in drybulk vessels or an increase in supply of drybulk vessels could cause a significant
decline in charter rates, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
There can be no assurance as to the sustainability of future economic growth, if any, due to unexpected demand shocks.
A negative change in global
economic or regulatory conditions, especially in the Asian region, which includes countries like China, Japan and India, could
reduce drybulk trade and demand, which could reduce charter rates and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
We expect that a significant
number of the port calls made by our vessels will involve the loading or discharging of raw materials in ports in the Asian region,
particularly China, Japan and India. As a result, a negative change in economic or regulatory conditions in any Asian country,
particularly China, Japan or, to some extent, India, can have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and
results of operations, as well as our future prospects, by reducing demand and, as a result, charter rates and affecting our ability
to charter our vessels. If economic growth declines in China, Japan, India and other countries in the Asian region, or if the regulatory
environment in these countries changes adversely for our industry, we may face decreases in such drybulk trade and demand. Moreover,
a slowdown in the United States economy or the economies of countries within the E.U. will likely adversely affect economic growth
in China, Japan, India and other countries in the Asian region. Such an economic downturn in any of these countries could have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
An oversupply of drybulk vessel
capacity may lead to reductions in charter rates and results of operations.
The market supply of drybulk
vessels has been increasing in terms of dwt, and the number of drybulk vessels on order as of December 31, 2022 was approximately
8.3% for Panamax to Post-Panamax class vessels and 5.9% for Capesize class vessels, as compared to the then-existing global drybulk
fleet in terms of dwt, with the majority of new deliveries expected during 2023. As a result, the drybulk fleet continues to grow.
In addition, during periods when there are high expectations for charter market recovery, a large number of orders may be placed
in shipyards, resulting in a further increase of newbuild orders and accordingly in the size of the global drybulk fleet. An oversupply
of drybulk vessel capacity will likely result in a reduction of charter hire rates. We will be exposed to changes in charter rates
with respect to our existing fleet and our remaining newbuild, depending on the ultimate growth of the global drybulk fleet. If
we cannot enter into period time charters on acceptable terms, we may have to secure charters in the spot market, where charter
rates are more volatile and revenues are, therefore, less predictable, or we may not be able to charter our vessels at all. In
our current fleet, as of February 24, 2023, 22 vessels will be available for employment in the first half of 2023. A material increase
in the net supply of drybulk vessel capacity without corresponding growth in drybulk vessel demand could have a material adverse
effect on our fleet utilization and our charter rates generally, and could, accordingly, materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
The market value of drybulk
vessels is highly volatile, being related to charter market conditions, aging and environmental regulations. The market values
of our vessels may significantly decrease which could cause us to breach covenants in our credit and loan facilities and our bond,
and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our credit and loan facilities,
which are secured by mortgages on our vessels, and our bond which is unsecured, require us to comply with collateral coverage ratios
and satisfy certain financial and other covenants, including those that are affected by the market value
of our vessels. The market values
of drybulk vessels have generally experienced significant volatility within a short period of time. In recent years, the market
prices for second-hand and newbuild drybulk vessels significantly declined in 2020 due to depressed market conditions as a result
of Covid-19, recovered since then during 2021 and the first months of 2022, and have decreased during the last months of 2022 and
the first months of 2023, as a result of prevailing charter market conditions. Before that, in the previous years, the market prices
for second-hand and newbuild drybulk vessels experienced very low levels in 2016, when vessel values were reduced in a short period
of time due to depressed market conditions, a significant increase in 2017, followed by a small increase in 2018 and 2019. The
market value of our vessels fluctuates depending on a number of factors, including:
|
~ |
general economic and market conditions affecting the shipping industry; |
|
~ |
rising interest rates and inflationary pressures; |
|
~ |
prevailing level of charter rates; |
|
~ |
supply of and demand for vessels; |
|
~ |
general vessel’s condition and vessel’s specification; |
|
~ |
vessel environmental performance (GHG rating, BWTS installation, Scrubbers installation, etc.); |
|
~ |
distressed asset sales, including newbuild contract sales during weak charter market conditions; |
|
~ |
lack of financing and limitations imposed by financial covenants affecting the market value of vessels; |
|
~ |
competition from other shipping companies and other modes of transportation; |
|
~ |
configurations, types, sizes and ages of vessels; |
|
~ |
changes in governmental, environmental or other regulations that may limit the useful life of vessels; and |
|
~ |
technological advances. |
We were in compliance with our
covenants in our credit and loan facilities and our bond, in effect as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2022. If the market
value of our vessels, or our newbuilds upon delivery to us, decline, we may breach some of the covenants contained in our credit
and loan facilities and our bond. If we do breach such covenants and we are unable to remedy or our lenders refuse to waive the
relevant breach, our lenders could accelerate our indebtedness and foreclose on the vessels in our fleet securing those loan and
credit facilities. As a result of cross-default provisions contained in our loan and credit facility agreements and our bond, this
could in turn lead to additional defaults under our financing agreements and the consequent acceleration of the indebtedness under
those agreements and the commencement of similar foreclosure proceedings by other lenders and our bondholders. If our indebtedness
was accelerated in full or in part, it would be difficult for us to refinance our debt or obtain additional financing on favorable
terms or at all and we could lose our vessels if our lenders foreclose their liens, which would adversely affect our ability to
continue our business.
A significant decrease of
the market values of our vessels could cause us to incur an impairment loss and could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
We review for impairment our
vessels on a quarterly basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the vessels may
not be recoverable. Such indicators include declines in the fair market value of vessels, decreases in market charter rates, vessel
sale and purchase considerations, fleet utilization, environmental and other regulatory changes in the drybulk shipping industry
or changes in business plans or overall market conditions that may adversely affect cash flows. We may be required to record an
impairment charge with respect to our vessels and any such impairment charge resulting from a decline in the market value of our
vessels or a decrease in charter rates may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our financial results may be similarly affected in the future if we record an impairment charge or sell vessels at a loss before
we record an impairment adjustment. Conversely, if vessel values are elevated at a time when we wish to acquire additional vessels,
the cost of such acquisitions may increase and this could adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flow and financial
condition.
See “Item 5. Operating
and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results—Critical Accounting Estimates—Impairment of Vessels”
for more information.
Technological developments
could reduce our earnings and the value of our vessels.
Determining factors for the useful
life of the vessels in our fleet are efficiency, operational flexibility and technological developments. Efficiency includes speed,
fuel economy, which is also related to GHG emissions, and the ability to load and discharge cargo quickly. Flexibility includes
the ability to enter harbors, utilize related docking facilities and pass through canals and straits. The duration of a vessel’s
useful life is related to its original design and construction, its maintenance and the impact of the stress of operations. If
new vessels are built that are more efficient or more flexible or have longer useful lives than our vessels, competition from these
more technologically advanced vessels could adversely affect the amount of charter hire payments we receive for our vessels, and
the resale value of our vessels could significantly decrease. As a result, our earnings and financial condition could be adversely
affected.
The international drybulk
shipping industry is highly competitive, and we may not be able to compete successfully for charters with new entrants or established
companies with greater resources
We employ our vessels in a highly
competitive market that is capital intensive and highly fragmented. Competition arises primarily from other vessel owners, some
of whom have substantially greater resources than we do. Competition for the transportation of drybulk cargo by sea is intense
and depends on price, customer relationships, operating expertise, professional reputation and size, age, location and condition
of the vessel. Due in part to the highly fragmented market, additional competitors with greater resources could enter the drybulk
shipping industry and operate larger fleets through consolidations or acquisitions and may be able to offer lower charter rates
than we are able to offer, which could have a material adverse effect on our fleet utilization and, accordingly, our results of
operations.
Changes in labor laws and
regulations, collective bargaining negotiations and labor disputes, and potential challenges for crew availability as a result
of increasing difficulty in workforce recruitment in certain markets due to various reasons, including the war between Russia and
Ukraine, could increase our crew costs and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial
condition and ability to pay dividends.
Crew costs are a significant
expense for us under our charters. There is a limited supply of well-qualified crew. We bear crewing costs under our charters.
Increases in crew costs may adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, labor disputes or unrest, including work stoppages,
strikes and/or work disruptions or increases imposed by collective bargaining agreements covering the majority of our officers
on board our vessels could result in higher personnel costs and significantly affect our financial performance. Furthermore, while
we do not have any Ukrainian or Russian crew, the Company’s vessels, currently do not sail in the Black Sea and the Company
otherwise conducts limited operations in Russia and Ukraine, the extent to which this will impact the Company’s future results
of operations and financial condition will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted. Changes
in labor laws and regulations, collective bargaining negotiations and labor disputes, and potential shortage of crew due to the
war between Russia and Ukraine, could increase our crew costs and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations,
cash flows, financial condition and ability to pay dividends.
We are subject to regulations
and liability under environmental laws that require significant expenditures, which can affect the ability and competitiveness
of our vessels to trade, our results of operations and financial condition.
Our business and the operation
of our vessels are regulated under international conventions, national, state and local laws and regulations in force in the jurisdictions
in which our vessels operate, as well as in the country or countries of their registration, in relation to potential environmental
impacts. Regulations of vessels, particularly environmental regulations have become more stringent, including regulations related
to marine pollution, BWTS implementation, exhaust gas emissions such as nitrogen oxides (“NOx”) sulfur oxides (“SOx”),
particulate matter, etc., as well as GHG emissions such as carbon dioxide (“CO2”), methane, etc. Some of those GHG
emission regulations are expected to be further revised and become stricter in the future and associated with Emissions Trading
Systems (“ETS”). As a result significant capital expenditures may be required on our vessels to keep them in compliance,
and we may be required to pay increased prices for newbuild and secondhand vessels that meet these requirements.
See “Item 4. Information
on the company. — B. Business Overview — Regulations: Safety and the Environment” for more information.
In addition, the heightened environmental,
quality and security concerns of the public, regulators, insurance underwriters, financing sources and charterers may generally
lead to additional regulatory requirements, including enhanced risk assessment and security requirements, greater inspection and
safety requirements on all vessels in the marine transportation markets and possibly restrictions on the emissions of greenhouse
gases from the operation of vessels. These requirements are likely to add incremental costs to our operations and the failure to
comply with these requirements may affect the ability of our vessels to obtain and, possibly, collect on insurance or to obtain
the required certificates for entry into the different ports where we operate. We could also incur material liabilities, including
cleanup obligations and claims for natural resource, personal injury and property damages in the event that there is a release
of petroleum or other hazardous materials from our vessels or otherwise in connection with our operations. Violations of, or liabilities
under, environmental regulations can result in substantial penalties, fines and other sanctions, including, in certain instances,
seizure or detention of our vessels. Any such actual or alleged environmental laws regulations and policies violation, under negligence,
willful misconduct or fault, could result in substantial fines, civil and/or criminal penalties or curtailment of operations in
certain jurisdictions, and might adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. In addition, actual
or alleged violations could damage our reputation and ability to do business. Furthermore, detecting, investigating and resolving
actual or alleged violations is expensive and can consume significant time and attention of our senior management. Events of this
nature would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our Scrubber-fitted vessels
may face difficulties from the price differential between VLSFO and HSFO, regulatory restrictions and shortage in availability
of HSFO, while our non–scrubber fitted vessels may face difficulties in competing with Scrubber-fitted vessels and incur
additional repairs and maintenance costs, affecting our results of operations.
A global 0.5% sulfur cap on marine
fuels came into force on January 1, 2020, as agreed in amendments adopted in 2008 for Annex VI to MARPOL reducing the previous
sulfur cap of 3.5%. Vessels may use either VLSFO or HSFO only if they are equipped with Scrubbers. In response to sulfur oxide
emissions regulations, we have currently installed Scrubbers in 19 of our vessels and we expect to install three additional Scrubbers
in the remainder of 2023 and one in 2024.
The viability of Scrubber investments
mainly depends on the price differential between VLSFO, which usually are more expensive, and HSFO. The use of VLSFO between 2020
and 2022 had raised concerns in relation to excess wear of piston liners and fuel pumps. On the other hand a shortage of HSFO in
certain ports had been experienced as only a small percentage of the global fleet was equipped with Scrubbers and the trading of
HSFO may not continue be economical to fuel suppliers.
If the price differential between
VLSFO and HSFO is narrower than expected due to among other things, a drop in oil prices and/ or a reduced demand for oil, then
we may not realize any return, or we may realize a lower return on our investment in Scrubbers than that which we expected, which
could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows and financial position. Conversely, if the price
differential between VLSFO and HSFO is wider than expected, about half of our vessels that will not be equipped with Scrubbers
may face difficulties in competing with vessels equipped with Scrubbers. Furthermore, restrictions of effluents from Scrubbers
have been or are being considered to be imposed in various jurisdictions, mainly in ports, which may affect the viability of such
investments. All the above could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows and financial position.
See “Item 4. Information
on the company. — B. Business Overview — IMO and other related regulations — Nitrogen and Sulfur Oxide Emission
Regulations” for more information.
Environmental regulations
in relation to climate change and GHG emissions may increase operational and financial restrictions, and environmental compliance
costs.
A number of countries and the
IMO have adopted, or are considering the adoption of, regulatory frameworks to reduce greenhouse gas emissions due to concern over
the risk of climate change. These regulatory measures may include, among others, the adoption of cap and trade regimes, carbon
taxes, increased efficiency standards and incentives or mandates for renewable energy. GHG reduction measures adopted, or further
additional measures to be adopted by the IMO, EU and other jurisdictions for achieving 2030 goals may impose operational and financial
restrictions, carbon taxes or an emission trading system on less efficient vessels starting from 2023, gradually affecting younger
vessels, even newbuilds after 2030, reducing their trade and competitiveness, increasing their environmental compliance costs,
imposing additional energy efficiency investments, or even making such vessels obsolete. This or other developments may lead to
environmental taxation affecting less energy efficient vessels, reduce their trade and competitiveness and make certain vessels
in our fleet obsolete, which may result in financial impacts on our results of operations that we cannot predict with certainty
at this time. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
See “Item 4. Information
on the company. — B. Business Overview — Regulations: Safety and the Environment - Greenhouse Gas Regulation –
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change” for more information.
In response to the above GHG
environmental regulations, we monitor CO2 vessel emissions pursuant to the International Maritime Organization’s fuel oil
consumption Data Collection System (“IMO DCS”) and to the European Monitoring, Reporting and Verification Regulation
(“EU-MRV”), assessing in parallel the applicability of relevant energy efficiency measures. Furthermore, we have pursued
a fleet renewal strategy having entered into memoranda of agreement for the acquisition of twelve in total environmentally advanced
dry-bulk GHG-EEDI Phase 3 NOx-Tier III compliant newbuilds, three of which have already been delivered, four are scheduled to be
delivered in the remainder of 2023, three in 2024 and two in the first half of 2025.
Increasing scrutiny and changing
expectations from investors, lenders and other market participants with respect to our ESG policies may impose additional costs
on us or expose us to additional risks.
Companies across all industries,
including the shipping industry, are facing increased scrutiny relating to their ESG policies. Investor advocacy groups, certain
institutional investors, investment funds, lenders and other market participants are increasingly focused on ESG practices and
in recent years have placed increasing importance on the implications and social cost of their investments. The increased focus
and activism related to ESG and similar matters may hinder access to capital, as investors and lenders may decide to reallocate
capital or to not commit capital as a result of their assessment of a company’s ESG practices. Companies which do not adapt
to or comply with investor, lender or other industry shareholder expectations and standards, which are evolving, or which are perceived
to have not responded appropriately to the growing concern for ESG issues, regardless of whether there is a legal requirement to
do so, may suffer from reputational damage and the business, financial condition, and/or the stock price of such a company could
be materially and adversely affected. As a result, we may be required to implement more stringent ESG procedures or standards so
that we continue to have access to capital and our existing and future investors and lenders remain invested in us and make further
investments in us.
Specifically, we may face increasing
pressures from investors, lenders and other market participants, who are increasingly focused on climate change, to prioritize
sustainable energy practices, reduce our carbon footprint and promote sustainability. Additionally, certain investors and lenders
may exclude drybulk shipping companies, such as us, from their investing portfolios altogether due to environmental, social and
governance factors. Growing public concern about the environmental impact and the adverse consequences of climate change may also
affect demand for our services, such as reduced demand for coal in the future, one of the primary cargoes carried by our vessels.
Any long-term economic consequences of climate change could have a significant financial and operational adverse impact on our
business that we cannot predict with certainty at this time. If we are faced with limitations in the debt and/or equity markets
as a result of these concerns, or if we are unable to access alternative means of financing on acceptable terms, or at all, we
may be unable to access funds to implement our business strategy or service our indebtedness, which could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Over the past few years, we have
made publicly available our annual sustainability report where we present our environmental, social and governance strategy for
the future, as well as the impact of our operations and business on society and the environment.
See “Item 4. Information
on the company. — B. Business Overview” for more information.
However, in light of investors’
increased focus on ESG matters, there can be no certainty that we will manage to successfully meet society’s expectations
as to our proper role. Any failure or perceived failure by us in this regard could have a material adverse effect on our reputation
and on our business, share price, financial condition, or results of operations, including the sustainability of our business over
time.
We are subject to complex
laws and regulations, including international safety regulations and requirements imposed by our classification societies and the
failure to comply with these regulations and requirements may subject us to increased costs and liability, may adversely affect
our insurance coverage and may result in a denial of access to, or detention in, certain ports.
We are subject to complex laws
and regulations, such as international conventions, regulations and treaties, national laws, state and local laws and regulations
in force in the jurisdictions in which the vessels operate, as well as in the country or countries of
their registration. We are required
by various governmental and quasi-governmental agencies to obtain certain permits, licenses, certificates and financial assurances
with respect to our operations. In addition, vessel classification societies also impose significant safety and other requirements
on our vessels. Because such conventions, laws, and regulations are often revised, we may not be able to predict the ultimate cost
of complying with such conventions, laws and regulations or the impact thereof on the resale prices or useful lives of our vessels.
Compliance with regulations and laws could limit our ability to do business or increase the cost of our doing business, which could
have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition and our available cash.
Our industry’s regulatory
environment is becoming exponentially complex and includes regulations of the European Union, the United Nations, the IMO and the
United States, such as the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships of 1973 (“ISM Code”),
including the designation of Emission Control Areas, the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code, the United States
Oil Pollution Act of 1990, the U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, the U.S. Clean
Air Act, the U.S. Clean Water Act, the U.S. Marine Transportation Security Act of 2002 and others. In the foreseeable future we
expect the trend of increasing regulatory compliance complexity to continue. For example, United States agencies and the IMO’s
Maritime Safety Committee have adopted cyber security regulations which requires ship owners and managers to incorporate cyber
risk management and security into their safety management.
The operation of our vessels
is affected by the requirements set forth in the IMO ISM Code. Under the ISM Code, we are required to develop and maintain an extensive
Safety Management System (“SMS”) that includes the adoption of a safety and environmental protection policy. Failure
to comply with the ISM Code may subject us to increased liability, invalidate existing insurance or decrease available insurance
coverage for the affected vessels and result in a denial of access to, or detention in, certain ports. For example, the U.S. Coast
Guard and E.U. authorities have indicated that vessels not in compliance with the ISM Code will be prohibited from trading in U.S.
and E.U. ports. Currently, each of the vessels in our current fleet is ISM Code-certified, but we may not be able to maintain such
certification at all times. If we fail to maintain ISM Code certification for our vessels, we may also breach covenants in certain
of our credit and loan facilities that require that our vessels be ISM Code-certified. If we breach such covenants due to failure
to maintain ISM Code certification and are unable to remedy the relevant breach, our lenders could accelerate our indebtedness
and foreclose on the vessels in our fleet securing those credit or loan facilities.
See Item 4. Information on
the Company-Business Overview-Environmental and Other Regulations for more information.
Increased inspection procedures,
tighter import and export controls and survey requirements could increase costs and disrupt our business.
International shipping is subject
to various security and customs inspections and related procedures in countries of origin and destination. Inspection procedures
can result in the seizure of the contents of our vessels, delays in the loading, offloading or delivery and the levying of customs
duties, fines and other penalties against us. It is possible that changes to inspection procedures could impose additional financial
and legal obligations on us. Furthermore, changes to inspection procedures could also impose additional costs and obligations on
our customers and may, in certain cases, render the shipment of certain types of cargo impractical. Any such changes or developments
may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The hull and machinery of every
commercial vessel must be certified as safe and seaworthy in accordance with applicable rules and regulations, and accordingly
vessels must undergo regular surveys. If any vessel does not maintain its class and/or fails any annual survey, intermediate survey
or special survey, the vessel will be unable to trade between ports and will be unemployable and we would be in violation of certain
covenants in our credit and loan facilities. This would also negatively impact our revenues.
Our vessels are exposed to
operational risks that may not be adequately covered by our insurance.
The operation of any vessel includes
risks such as weather conditions, mechanical failure, collision, fire, contact with floating objects, cargo or property loss or
damage and business interruption due to political circumstances in countries, piracy, terrorist and cyber terrorist attacks, armed
hostilities and labor strikes. Such occurrences could result in death or injury to persons, loss, damage or destruction of property
or environmental damage, delays in the delivery of cargo, loss of revenues from or termination of charter contracts, governmental
fines, penalties or restrictions on conducting business, higher insurance rates and damage to our reputation and customer relationships
generally.
We may not be adequately insured
against all risks, and our insurers may not pay particular claims. With respect to war risks insurance, which we usually obtain
for certain of our vessels making port calls in designated war zone areas, such insurance may not be obtained prior to one of our
vessels entering into an actual war zone, which could result in that vessel not being insured. Even if our insurance coverage is
adequate to cover our losses, we may not be able to timely obtain a replacement vessel in the event of a loss. Under the terms
of our credit facilities, we will be subject to restrictions on the use of any proceeds we may receive from claims under our insurance
policies. Furthermore, in the future, we may not be able to maintain or obtain adequate insurance coverage at reasonable rates
for our fleet. We may also be subject to calls, or premiums, in amounts based not only on our own claim records but also the claim
records of all other members of the protection and indemnity associations through which we receive indemnity insurance coverage
for tort liability. Our insurance policies also contain deductibles, limitations and exclusions which, although we believe are
standard in the shipping industry, may nevertheless increase our costs in the event of a claim or decrease any recovery in the
event of a loss. If the damages from a catastrophic oil spill or other marine disaster exceed our insurance coverage, the payment
of those damages could have a material adverse effect on our business and could possibly result in our insolvency.
In general, we do not carry loss
of hire insurance. Occasionally, we may decide to carry loss of hire insurance when our vessels are trading in areas where a history
of piracy has been reported. Loss of hire insurance covers the loss of revenue during extended
vessel off-hire periods, such
as those that occur during an unscheduled drydocking or unscheduled repairs due to damage to the vessel. Accordingly, any loss
of a vessel or any extended period of vessel off-hire, due to an accident or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
World events, including terrorist
attacks, international hostilities and potential disruption of shipping routes due to events outside of our control, including
the war between Russia and Ukraine, could negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition.
We conduct most of our operations
outside of the U.S. and our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and ability to pay dividends, if any,
in the future may be adversely affected by changing economic, political and government conditions in the countries and regions
where our vessels are employed or registered. Moreover, we operate in a sector of the economy that is likely to be adversely impacted
by the effects of political conflicts, including the current political instability in the Middle East, North Africa and other countries
and geographic areas, terrorist or other attacks and war or international hostilities. Terrorist attacks and the continuing response
of the U.S. and others to these attacks, as well as the threat of future terrorist attacks around the world, continues to cause
uncertainty in the world’s financial markets and may affect our business, operating results and financial condition. Continuing
conflicts and recent developments in the Middle East and North Africa, the escalation of war between Russia and Ukraine, and the
presence of U.S. or other armed forces in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and various other regions, may lead to additional acts of terrorism
and armed conflict around the world, which may contribute to further economic instability in the global financial markets. These
uncertainties could also adversely affect our ability to obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to us or at all. In the
past, political conflicts have also resulted in attacks on vessels, mining of waterways and other efforts to disrupt international
shipping, particularly in the Arabian Gulf region. These types of attacks have also affected vessels trading in regions such as
the Black Sea, South China Sea and the Gulf of Aden off the coast of Somalia. The IMO’s extraordinary council session held
on 10th and 11th March 2022, addressed the impacts on shipping and seafarers, as a result of the war in the Black Sea and the Sea
of Azov. The IMO called for the need to preserve the integrity of maritime supply chains and the safety and welfare of seafarers
and any spillover effects of the military action on global shipping, logistics and supply chains, in particular the impacts on
the delivery of commodities and food to developing nations and the impacts on energy supplies. Any of these occurrences could have
a material adverse impact on our operating results, revenues and costs.
The war between Russia and Ukraine,
which commenced in February 2022 and is still ongoing, has disrupted supply chains and caused instability and significant volatility
in the global economy. Much uncertainty remains regarding the global impact of the war in Ukraine, and it is possible that such
instability, uncertainty and resulting volatility could significantly increase our costs and adversely affect our business, including
our ability to secure charters and financing on attractive terms, and as a result, adversely affect our business, financial condition,
results of operation and cash flows.
As a result of the war between
Russia and Ukraine, Switzerland, the US, the EU, the UK and others have announced unprecedented levels of sanctions and other measures
against Russia and certain Russian entities and nationals. Such sanctions against Russia may adversely affect our business, financial
condition, results of operation and cash flows. For example, apart from the immediate commercial disruptions caused in the war
zone, escalating tensions among the two countries and fears of potential shortages in the supply of Russian crude have caused the
price of oil to trade above $100 per barrel from February 28, 2022 to August 2, 2022. The ongoing war could result in the imposition
of further economic sanctions against Russia, with uncertain impacts on the drybulk market and the world economy. While we do not
have any Ukrainian or Russian crew, our vessels currently do not sail in the Black Sea and we otherwise conduct limited operations
in Russia and Ukraine, it is possible that the war in Ukraine, including any increased shipping costs, disruptions of global shipping
routes, any impact on the global supply chain and any impact on current or potential customers caused by the events in Russia and
Ukraine, could adversely affect our operations or financial performance.
The outbreak and ongoing threat
of Covid-19 or other public health threats and epidemics and the resulting disruptions to the international shipping industry,
could negatively affect our business, financial performance and our results of operations.
On March 18, 2020, the outbreak
of Covid-19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. Covid-19 has affected our industry, see “Item 4. Information
on the company. — B. Business Overview — Corona Virus Outbreak” for more information. The extent and duration
to which the Covid-19 outbreak and measures taken in response thereto may continue to negatively impact our business, financial
performance and operating results, remain largely uncertain and dependent on the impact of future developments that cannot be accurately
predicted at this time. Such developments may include, but are not limited to, the severity and transmission rate of potential
new Covid-19 variants, the extent to which vaccines are available to our crew, and the effectiveness of the containment actions
taken, such as travel and cargo restrictions. As a result, it is not possible to ascertain the overall future impact of Covid-19
on our business. However, the occurrence of any of the foregoing events or other epidemics or an increase in the severity or duration
of Covid-19 and any new virus wave, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial
condition, value of our vessels, and our ability to pay dividends.
While government restrictions
have eased throughout 2022 and people have largely resumed pre-pandemic activities, the effects of Covid-19 continue to linger
in the global economy and our supply chain. The effects of restrictions on our operations, including future restrictions and extended
periods of remote work arrangements, could strain our business continuity plans, introduce operational risk, including but not
limited to cybersecurity risks, and impair our ability to manage our business. The Covid-19 pandemic presents material uncertainty
and risk with respect to our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and performance. Future disruptions and governmental
actions, due to Covid-19 or a different epidemic or pandemic, combined with any associated economic and/or social instability or
distress, may have an adverse impact on our results of operations, financial
condition and cash flows.
Acts of piracy on ocean-going
vessels may increase in frequency, which could adversely affect our business.
Acts of piracy have historically
affected ocean-going vessels trading in regions of the world such as the South China Sea, the Indian Ocean and in the Gulf of
Aden off the coast of Somalia. Although the frequency of sea piracy worldwide has generally decreased since 2013, sea piracy incidents
continue to occur, particularly in the Gulf of Aden off the coast of Somalia and increasingly in the Sulu Sea and the Gulf of Guinea,
with drybulk vessels and tankers particularly vulnerable to such attacks. Acts of piracy could result in harm or danger to the
crews that man our vessels.
If these piracy attacks occur
in regions in which our vessels are deployed that insurers characterized as “war risk” zones or Joint War Committee
“war and strikes” listed areas, premiums payable for such coverage could increase significantly and such insurance
coverage may be more difficult to obtain. In addition, crew costs, including the employment of onboard security guards, could increase
in such circumstances. Furthermore, while we believe the charterer remains liable for charter payments when a vessel is seized
by pirates, the charterer may dispute this and withhold charterhire until the vessel is released. A charterer may also claim that
a vessel seized by pirates was not “on-hire” for a certain number of days and is therefore entitled to cancel the charter
party, a claim that we would dispute. We may not be adequately insured to cover losses from these incidents, which could have a
material adverse effect on us. In addition, any detention hijacking as a result of an act of piracy against our vessels, or an
increase in cost, or unavailability, of insurance for our vessels, could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial
condition and earnings.
The operation of drybulk vessels
has certain unique operational and technical risks which include mechanical failure, collision, property loss, cargo loss or damage
as well as personal injury, illness and loss of life and could lead to an environmental disaster; failure to adequately maintain
our vessels or address such risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The operation of a drybulk vessel
has certain unique operational and technical risks which include mechanical failure, collision, property loss, cargo loss or damage
as well as personal injury, illness and loss of life and could lead to an environmental disaster. Drybulk vessels may develop unexpected
mechanical and operational problems due to several reasons including improper maintenance and weather conditions. We operate certain
of our vessels using VLSFO, some of which, under certain conditions, may cause loss of the vessel’s main engine power with
severe results that can lead to collision and loss of a vessel.
With a drybulk vessel, the cargo
itself and its interaction with the vessel may create operational risks. By their nature, drybulk cargoes are often heavy, dense
and easily shifted, and they may react badly to water exposure. In addition, drybulk vessels are often subjected to battering treatment
during unloading operations with grabs, jackhammers (to pry encrusted cargoes out of the hold) and small bulldozers. This treatment
may cause damage to the vessel. Vessels damaged due to treatment during unloading procedures or with steel plate diminution may
be more susceptible to breach while at sea. Breaches of a drybulk vessel’s hull may lead to the flooding of the vessel’s
holds. If a drybulk vessel suffers flooding in its forward holds, the bulk cargo may become so dense and waterlogged that its pressure
may buckle the vessel’s bulkheads, leading to the loss of a vessel. If we do not adequately maintain our vessels or address
such operational and technical risks, we may be unable to prevent these events. The occurrence of any of these events could have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Maritime claimants could arrest
one or more of our vessels, which could interrupt our cash flow.
Crew members, suppliers of goods
and services to a vessel, shippers of cargo and other parties may be entitled to a maritime lien against a vessel, or other assets
of the relevant vessel-owning company, for unsatisfied debts, claims or damages. In many jurisdictions, a claimant may seek to
obtain security for its claim by arresting a vessel through foreclosure proceedings. The arrest or attachment of one or more of
our vessels, or other assets of the relevant vessel-owning company or companies, could cause us to default on a charter, breach
covenants in certain of our credit facilities, interrupt our cash flow and require us to pay large sums of money to have the arrest
or attachment lifted. In addition, in some jurisdictions, such as South Africa, under the “sister ship” theory of liability,
a claimant may arrest both the vessel which is subject to the claimant’s maritime lien and any “associated” vessel,
which is any vessel owned or controlled by the same owner. Claimants could attempt to assert “sister ship” liability
against one vessel in our fleet for claims relating to another of our vessels.
Governments could requisition
our vessels during a period of war or emergency, resulting in a loss of earnings.
A government could requisition
one or more of our vessels for title or for hire. Requisition for title occurs when a government takes control of a vessel and
becomes its owner, while requisition for hire occurs when a government takes control of a vessel and effectively becomes its charterer
at dictated charter rates. Generally, requisitions occur during periods of war or emergency, although governments may elect to
requisition vessels in other circumstances. Even if we would be entitled to compensation in the event of a requisition of one or
more of our vessels, the amount and timing of payment would be uncertain. Government requisition of one or more of our vessels
may cause us to breach covenants in certain of our credit facilities, and could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
We rely on information technology,
and if we are unable to protect against service interruptions, data corruption, cyber based attacks or network security breaches,
our operations could be disrupted and our business could be negatively affected.
In the ordinary course of business,
we rely on information technology networks and systems to process, transmit, and store electronic information and to manage or
support a variety of business processes and activities. Our information systems and networks could become targeted and attacked
by individuals or organized groups. Our vessels may also rely on information
systems for parts of their navigation,
propulsion, power control, communications and cargo operations. Safety measures are in place to secure our vessels against cyber-security
attacks and disruptions to their information systems. These measures may not adequately prevent security breaches from constantly
evolving and increasingly sophisticated threats. A cyber attack could materially and adversely affect our business operations,
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows and our reputation. In addition, cyber attacks could lead to potential
unauthorized access to our systems targeting ransomware, data theft, loss and corruption, disclosure of proprietary or confidential
information or, personal data. Cyber attacks on our vessels may also lead to potential unauthorized access to, or service interruptions,
denial or manipulation of the navigational systems of our vessels, which could result in hazardous accidents. There is no assurance
that we will not experience these service interruptions or cyber attacks in the future. Further, as the methods of cyber attacks
continue to evolve, we may be required to expend additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures,
or to investigate and remedy any vulnerabilities to cyber attacks. Moreover, we do not carry cyber attack insurance to cover the
aforementioned risks to our information technology. A cyber attack could also lead to litigation, fines, other remedial action,
heightened regulatory scrutiny and reputational damage. In addition, our remediation efforts may not be successful, and we may
not have adequate insurance to cover these losses. These information technology systems, some of which are managed by third parties,
may be susceptible to damage, disruptions or shutdowns, hardware or software failures, power outages, computer viruses, cyber attacks,
telecommunication failures, user errors or catastrophic events. Risks and vulnerabilities can also arise out of inadequacies in
design, integration and/or maintenance of information technology systems, as well as lapses in cyber discipline. Furthermore,
as of May 25, 2018, data breaches on personal data, as defined in the European General Data Protection Regulation, could lead to
administrative fines up to €20 million or up to 4% of the total worldwide annual turnover of the company, whichever is greater.
Our information technology systems are becoming increasingly integrated, so damage, disruption or shutdown to the system could
result in a more widespread impact. If our information technology systems suffer severe damage, disruption or shutdown, and our
business continuity plans do not effectively resolve the issues in a timely manner, our operations could be disrupted and our business
and reputation could be negatively affected. Moreover, cyber attacks against the Ukrainian government and other countries in the
region have been reported in connection with the war between Russia and Ukraine. To the extent such attacks have collateral effects
on global critical shipping infrastructure or on us, such developments could adversely affect our business, operating results and
financial condition.
Recent action by the IMO’s
Maritime Safety Committee and U.S. agencies indicate that cyber security regulations for the maritime industry are likely to be
further developed in the near future in an attempt to combat cyber security threats. This might cause companies to cultivate additional
procedures for monitoring cyber security, which could require additional expenses and/or capital expenditures. However, the impact
of such regulations is difficult to predict at this time.
Political uncertainty and
an increase in trade protectionism could have a material adverse impact on our charterers’ business and, in turn, could cause
a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Our operations expose us to the
risk that increased trade protectionism from China, other countries in the Asian region, the United States or other nations will
adversely affect our business. If the global recovery is undermined by downside risks and the economic downturn returns, or if
the regulatory environment otherwise dictates, governments may turn to trade barriers to protect their domestic industries against
foreign imports, thereby depressing the demand for shipping. Specifically, increasing trade protectionism affecting the markets
that our charterers serve may cause (i) a decrease in cargoes available to our charterers in favor of domestic charterers and domestically
owned ships and (ii) an increase in the risks associated with importing goods to such markets. For instance, the government of
China has implemented economic policies aimed at increasing domestic consumption of Chinese-made goods and restricting currency
exchanges within China. Further, on January 23, 2017, former President Trump signed an executive order withdrawing the United States
from the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a global trade agreement intended to include the United States, Canada, Mexico, Peru and a
number of Asian countries. Further, in January 2019, the United States announced expanded sanctions against Venezuela, which may
have an effect on its oil output and in turn affect global oil supply. Throughout 2018 and 2019, former President Trump called
for substantial changes to foreign trade policy with China and raised, and proposed to further raise in the future, tariffs on
several Chinese goods in order to reverse what he perceived as unfair trade practices that have negatively impacted U.S. businesses.
The announcement of such tariffs has triggered retaliatory actions from foreign governments, including China, and may trigger retaliatory
actions by other foreign governments, resulting in a “trade war.” The trade war has had the effect of reducing the
supply of goods available for import or export and has therefore resulted in a decrease in demand for shipping. On January 15,
2020, the United States and China signed the Phase One Deal, agreeing to the rollback of tariffs, expansion of trade purchases,
and renewed commitments on intellectual property, technology transfer, and currency practices deescalating the trade war. Under
the Phase One Deal the U.S. has committed to reduce tariffs from 15% to 7.5% on US$120 billion worth of goods and China has agreed
to halve tariffs on 1,717 U.S. goods, lowering the tariff on some items from 10% to 5%, and others from 5% to 2.5%, which both
took effect on February 14, 2020. On January 19, 2022 U.S. President Joe Biden said he will not lift tariffs on Chinese imports
since Beijing has not abided by the Phase One Deal. Subsequently, in May 2022, US President Joe Biden stated that discussions were
ongoing about potentially dropping trade tariffs on China that were imposed by former US President Trump.
There is no certainty that the
de-escalation of the trade war between the U.S. and China will continue and there is no certainty that additional tariffs will
not be imposed by the U.S. or China. Should the de-escalation of the trade war discontinue or an increase in trade barriers or
restrictions on trade occur or be perceived to become likely, such events may have an adverse effect on global market conditions,
may have an adverse impact on global trade and our charterers’ business, operating results and financial condition and could
thereby affect their ability to make timely charter hire payments to us and to renew and increase the number of their time charters
with us. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Seasonal fluctuations in industry
demand could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and the amount of available
cash with which we can pay dividends.
We operate our vessels in markets
that have historically exhibited seasonal variations in demand and, as a result, in charter rates. Seasonality is related to several
factors and may result in quarter-to-quarter volatility in our results of operations, which could affect the amount of dividends,
if any, that we may pay to our shareholders. For example, the market for marine drybulk transportation services is typically stronger
in the fall months in anticipation of increased consumption of coal in the northern hemisphere during the winter months and the
grain export season from North America. Similarly, the market for marine drybulk transportation services is typically stronger
in the spring months in anticipation of the South American grain export season due to increased distance traveled by vessels to
their end destination known as ton mile effect, as well as increased coal imports in parts of Asia due to additional electricity
demand for cooling during the summer months. Demand for marine drybulk transportation services is typically weaker at the beginning
of the calendar year and during the summer months. In addition, unpredictable weather patterns during these periods tend to disrupt
vessel scheduling and supplies of certain commodities. This seasonality could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Charterers may renegotiate
or default on period time charters, which could reduce our revenues and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
The ability and willingness of
each of our counterparties to perform its obligations under a period time charter agreement with us will depend on a number of
factors that are beyond our control and may include, among other things, general economic conditions, the condition of the drybulk
shipping industry and the overall financial condition of the counterparties. If we enter into period time charters with charterers
when charter rates are high and charter rates subsequently fall significantly, charterers may seek to renegotiate financial terms
or may default on their obligations. Additionally, charterers may attempt to bring claims against us based on vessel performance
or cargo loading or unloading operations, seeking to renegotiate financial terms or avoid payments. Also, our charterers may experience
financial difficulties due to prevailing economic conditions or for other reasons, and as a result may default on their obligations.
In past years, the industry experienced numerous incidents of charterers renegotiating their charters or defaulting on their obligations
thereunder. In December 2020, we agreed to the early termination of an existing charter of a Capesize-class vessel at the request
of the charterer which was contractually due to expire in January 2024. In exchange for the early redelivery of the vessel, the
charterer paid us cash compensation of $8.1 million. The vessel was subsequently deployed under a new period time charter with
a different charterer for a duration of 12 to 14 months at a gross daily charter rate linked to the 5 TC Baltic Exchange Capesize
Index (“BCI-180 5TC”) times 119%. As of February 24, 2023, we had not received any additional notice of early
redelivery or termination from any of our charters. If a charterer defaults on a charter, we will, to the extent commercially reasonable,
seek the remedies available to us, which may include arbitration or litigation to enforce the contract, although such efforts may
not be successful. Should a charterer default on a period time charter, we may have to enter into a charter at a lower charter
rate, which would reduce our revenues. If we cannot enter into a new period time charter, we may have to secure a charter in the
spot market, where charter rates are volatile and revenues are less predictable. It is also possible that we would be unable to
secure a charter at all, which would also reduce our revenues, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, results of operations, loan and credit facility covenants and cash flows.
We depend on a limited number
of customers for a large part of our revenues and the loss of one or more of these customers could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We expect to derive a significant
part of our revenues from a limited number of customers. During the year ended December 31, 2022, two of our charterers each accounted
for more than 10.0% of our revenues and in previous periods some of our charterers each accounted for more than 10.0% of our revenues.
We could lose a customer for many different reasons, including:
|
~ |
a failure of the customer to make charter payments because of its financial inability, disagreements with us or otherwise; |
|
~ |
the customer’s termination of its charters because of our non-performance, including serious deficiencies with the vessels we provide to that customer or prolonged periods of off-hire; |
|
~ |
a prolonged force majeure event that affects the customer may prevent us from performing services for that customer, i.e., damage to or destruction of relevant production facilities and war or political unrest; and |
|
~ |
the other reasons discussed in this section. |
If we lose a key customer, we
may be unable to obtain period time charters on comparable terms with charterers of comparable standing or may have increased exposure
to the volatile spot market, which is highly competitive and subject to significant price fluctuations. We would not receive any
revenues from a vessel while it remained unchartered, but we may be required to pay expenses necessary to maintain the vessel in
proper operating condition, insure it and service any indebtedness secured by such vessel. The loss of any of our key customers,
a decline in payments under our charters or the failure of a key customer to perform under its charters with us could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
When our contracts expire,
we may not be able to successfully replace them. Our growth and our capacity to replace them depends on our ability to expand relationships
with existing customers and obtain new customers, for which we will face substantial competition from new entrants and established
companies with significant resources.
Time-charter contracts provide
income at pre-determined rates over short or more extended periods of time. However, the process for obtaining new time charters
especially longer term time charters is highly competitive and generally involves a lengthy, intensive and continuous screening
and vetting process and the submission of competitive bids. In addition to the quality, age and suitability of the vessel, longer
term shipping contracts tend to be awarded based upon a variety of other factors relating to the vessel operator, including:
|
|
|
|
~ |
the operator’s environmental, health and safety record; |
|
~ |
compliance with the IMO standards and regulatory industry standards; |
|
~ |
shipping industry relationships, reputation for customer service, technical and operating expertise; |
|
~ |
shipping experience and quality of ship operations, including cost-effectiveness; |
|
~ |
quality, experience and technical capability of crews; |
|
~ |
willingness to accept operational risks pursuant to the charter, such as allowing termination of the charter for force majeure events; and |
As a result of these factors
we may be unable to expand our relationships with existing customers or obtain new customers for our charters on a profitable basis,
if at all, therefore, when our contracts including our long-term charters expire, we cannot assure you that we will be able to
replace them promptly or at all or at rates sufficient to allow us to operate our business profitably, to meet our obligations,
including payment of debt service to our lenders, or to pay dividends. Our ability to renew the charter contracts on our vessels
on the expiration or termination of our current charters, or, on vessels that we may acquire in the future, the charter rates receivable
under any replacement charter contracts, will depend upon, among other things, economic conditions in the sectors in which our
vessels operate at that time, changes in the supply and demand for vessel capacity and changes in the supply and demand for the
transportation of commodities. During periods of market distress when long-term charters may be renewed at rates at or below operating
costs, we may not choose to charter our vessels for longer terms particularly if doing so would create an ongoing negative cash
flow during the period of the charter. We may instead choose to employ our vessels in the spot market for short periods, or in
index-linked charters, or be forced to idle our vessels, or lay them up, or scrap them depending on market conditions and outlook
at the time those vessels become available for charter.
However, if we are successful
in employing our vessels under longer-term time charters, our vessels will not be available for trading in the spot market during
an upturn in the market cycle, when spot trading may be more profitable. If we cannot successfully employ our vessels in profitable
charter contracts, our results of operations and operating cash flow could be materially adversely affected.
We have adopted an anti-bribery
policy consistent with the provisions of the FCPA and anti-bribery legislation in other jurisdictions. Actual or alleged violations
of these policies could result in damage of our reputation, sanctions, criminal penalties, imprisonment, civil action and fines,
which could have an adverse effect on our business.
We operate in a number of countries
throughout the world, including countries known to have a reputation for corruption. We are committed to doing business in accordance
with applicable anti-corruption laws and have adopted policies consistent and in full compliance with the FCPA and anti-bribery
legislation in other jurisdictions. We are subject, however, to the risk that we, our affiliated entities or our or their respective
officers, directors, employees and agents may take actions determined to be in violation of such anti-corruption laws, including
the FCPA. Any such violation could result in substantial fines, sanctions, civil and/or criminal penalties or curtailment of operations
in certain jurisdictions, and might adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. In addition, actual
or alleged violations could damage our reputation and ability to do business. Furthermore, detecting, investigating and resolving
actual or alleged violations is expensive and can consume significant time and attention of our senior management.
We may have difficulty properly
managing our planned growth through acquisitions of additional vessels.
As of February 24, 2023, we intend
to pursue a fleet renewal strategy having entered into contracts for the acquisition of nine environmentally advanced Japanese
and Chinese dry-bulk GHG-EEDI Phase 3 NOx-Tier III compliant newbuilds, scheduled to be delivered four in 2023, three in 2024 and
two in the first half of 2025. We may contract additional newbuild vessels or make selective acquisitions of additional second-hand
vessels. Our future growth will primarily depend on our ability to locate and acquire suitable vessels, enlarge our customer base,
operate and supervise any newbuilds we may order and obtain required debt or equity financing on acceptable terms.
A delay in the delivery to us
of any such vessel, or the failure of the shipyard to deliver a vessel at all, could cause us to breach our obligations under a
related charter and could adversely affect our earnings. In addition, the delivery of any of these vessels with substantial defects
could have similar consequences.
A shipyard could fail to deliver
a newbuild on time or at all because of:
|
~ |
work stoppages or other hostilities, political, economic or other disturbances that disrupt the operations of the shipyard, including as a result of Covid-19; |
|
~ |
quality or engineering problems; |
|
~ |
bankruptcy or other financial crisis of the shipyard; |
|
~ |
a backlog of orders at the shipyard; |
|
~ |
disputes between the Company and the shipyard regarding contractual obligations; |
|
~ |
weather interference or catastrophic events, such as major earthquakes or fires; |
|
~ |
our requests for changes to the original vessel specifications; or |
|
~ |
shortages of or delays in the receipt of necessary construction materials, such as steel, or equipment, such as main engines, electricity generators and propellers. |
A third-party seller could fail
to deliver a second-hand vessel on time or at all because of:
|
~ |
bankruptcy or other financial crisis of the third-party seller; |
|
~ |
quality or engineering problems; |
|
~ |
disputes between the Company and the third-party seller regarding contractual obligations; or |
|
~ |
weather interference or catastrophic events, such as major earthquakes or fires. |
In addition, we may seek to terminate
or novate a vessel acquisition contract due to market conditions, financing limitations or other reasons. The outcome of contract
termination or novation negotiations may require us to forego deposits on construction or acquisition, as applicable, and pay additional
cancellation fees. In addition, where we have already arranged a future charter with respect to the terminated contract, we may
incur liabilities to such charter counterparty depending on the terms of such charter.
During periods in which charter
rates are high, vessel values generally are high as well, and it may be difficult to consummate vessel acquisitions or enter into
newbuild contracts at favorable prices. During periods when charter rates are low, we may be unable to fund the acquisition of
vessels, whether through lending or cash on hand. For these reasons, we may be unable to execute our growth plans or avoid significant
expenses and losses in connection with our future growth efforts.
As we expand our business,
we will need to improve or expand our operations and financial systems, staff and crew; if we cannot improve these systems or recruit
suitable employees, our performance may be adversely affected.
Our current operating and financial
systems may not be adequate as we implement our plan to expand the size of our fleet, and our Managers’ attempts to improve
those systems may be ineffective. In addition, as we expand our fleet, we will have to rely on our Managers to recruit additional
seafarers and shoreside administrative and management personnel. Our Managers may not be able to continue to hire suitable employees
or a sufficient number of employees as we expand our fleet. If our Managers’ unaffiliated crewing agents encounter business
or financial difficulties, we may not be able to adequately staff our vessels. We may also have to increase our customer base to
provide continued employment for most of our new vessels. If we are unable to operate our financial systems, our Managers are unable
to operate our operations systems effectively or recruit suitable employees in sufficient numbers or we are unable to increase
our customer base as we expand our fleet, our performance may be adversely affected.
Unless we set aside reserves
for vessel replacement, at the end of a vessel’s useful life, our revenue will decline, which would adversely affect our
cash flows and income.
As of February 24, 2023, the
vessels in our current fleet had an average age of 10.5 years. Unless we maintain cash reserves for vessel replacement, we may
be unable to replace the vessels in our fleet upon the expiration of their useful lives. We estimate the useful life of our vessels
to be 25 years from the date of initial delivery from the shipyard. We estimate the useful life of our second-hand vessels to be
25 years from the date of built. Our cash flows and income are dependent on the revenues we earn by chartering our vessels to customers.
If we are unable to replace the vessels in our fleet upon the expiration of their useful lives, our business, financial condition
and results of operations will be materially adversely affected. Any reserves set aside for vessel replacement would not be available
for other cash needs or dividends.
Our ability to obtain financing
on favorable terms due to the unavailability of debt and equity capital and the deterioration of the global banking markets may
adversely impact our business. If economic conditions globally continue to be volatile, it could impede our operations.
Although capital markets have
improved since 2008, when banks and other financial institutions active in the shipping industry became increasingly unwilling
to provide credit, the shipping industry remains negatively affected by the scarcity of credit and the cost of financing has increased.
Financing institutions have increased interest rate margins or even ceased funding for certain shipping companies. Furthermore,
vessels older than 15 years old may not be financed by banks and other financial institutions at all. Any further deterioration
of the global banking markets may decrease the availability of financing or refinancing on acceptable terms when needed, and we
may be unable to meet our debt obligations as they become due.
Despite the uncertainty of growth
in China with 8.1% global gross domestic product (“GDP”) increase for 2021, a 3% increase in 2022, a
5.2% and 4.5% global GDP forecasted increase for 2023 and 2024, respectively, following the recent lifting of Covid-19 restrictions,
the projected economic growth in the U.S. and the E.U. with a forecast for 1.4% and 0.7% GDP growth for 2023, respectively, any
adverse developments in relation to trade war, Ukraine war or Covid-19 may affect credit markets globally and increase volatility
of global economic conditions which could impede our results of operations and financial condition.
If we are unable to obtain
additional secured indebtedness, we may be unable to refinance our existing indebtedness and may not be able to finance a fleet
replacement and expansion program in the future, any of which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
Global financial markets and
economic conditions have been volatile. Future financing and investing activities may involve refinancing of certain existing
debt near or upon maturity and the financing of future fleet replacement and expansion. Our ability to refinance existing indebtedness,
or to access the capital markets for future offerings may be limited by our financial condition at the time of any such financing
or offering, including the actual or perceived credit quality of our charterers and the market value of our fleet, as well as by
adverse market conditions resulting from, among other things, general economic conditions, weakness in the financial markets and
contingencies and uncertainties that are beyond our control. To the extent that we are unable to enter into new credit facilities
and obtain such additional secured indebtedness on terms acceptable to us, we will need to find alternative financing. In addition,
we may also be liable for other damages for breach of contract. A failure to satisfy our financial commitments could result in
the acceleration of our indebtedness and foreclosure on our vessels. Such events, if they occurred, would adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
The aging of our fleet and
our acquisitions of second-hand vessels may result in increased operating costs in the future, which could adversely affect our
ability to operate our vessels profitably.
In general, the costs to maintain
a vessel in good operating condition increase with the age of the vessel. As of February 24, 2023, the average age of the vessels
in our current fleet was 10.5 years. As our vessels age, they may become less fuel and energy
efficient and more costly to
maintain and will not be as advanced as more recently constructed vessels due to improvements in design and engine technology.
Rates for cargo insurance, paid by charterers, also increase with the age of a vessel, making older vessels less desirable to charterers.
Governmental regulations, safety or other equipment standards related to the age of vessels may require expenditures for alterations,
or the addition of new equipment, to our vessels and may restrict the type of activities in which our vessels may engage, which
could adversely affect our ability to operate our vessels profitably. As our vessels age, market conditions may not justify those
expenditures or enable us to operate our vessels profitably during the remainder of their useful lives.
Twenty-five vessels in our fleet
were over ten years old as of December 31, 2022. We may encounter higher operating and maintenance costs due to the age and condition
of those vessels. In addition, if in the future we acquire additional second-hand vessels, such vessels may develop unexpected
mechanical and operational problems despite adherence to regular survey schedules and proper maintenance. We cannot obtain the
same knowledge about the condition of a second-hand vessel compared to a newbuild through the performed inspection prior to the
purchase of such second-hand vessel nor about the cost of any required (or anticipated) repairs that we would have had if this
vessel had been built for and operated exclusively by us. We will have the benefit of warranties on newly constructed vessels;
we may not receive the benefit of warranties on second-hand vessels.
Due to our lack of vessel
diversification, supply chain issues and adverse developments in the drybulk transportation business could adversely affect our
business, financial condition and operating results.
We derive all our revenues exclusively
from our business operations in the drybulk transportation industry, unlike other shipping companies which have vessels that carry
liquefied gas, crude oil and oil products. Since we depend exclusively on the transport of drybulk, an adverse market development
in the drybulk sector of the transportation industry, such as the reduction of coal trade due to environmental concerns or the
disruption of the grains trade due to war in Ukraine could therefore have a stronger impact on our business, results of operations,
cash flows and financial condition, than if we had multiple sources of revenues, lines of businesses or types of assets.
As a result of discontinuance
of LIBOR quotations, our existing LIBOR-based borrowings will be converted to alternative reference rates, such as SOFR, plus a
spread adjustment, which could result in higher interest costs than if LIBOR remained available, and could have a material adverse
effect on our operating results, cash flows, and financial condition.
In July 2017, the U.K. Financial
Conduct Authority (“FCA”) announced that it would phase out LIBOR as a benchmark by the end of 2021. In March 2021,
the FCA and ICE Benchmark Administration Limited (the administrator of LIBOR) announced that all LIBOR settings would either cease
to be published by any benchmark administrator, or no longer be representative immediately after December 31, 2021 for all GBP,
EUR, CHF and JPY LIBOR rates and one-week and two-month USD LIBOR settings, and immediately after June 30, 2023 for overnight and
one, three, six and twelve-month USD LIBOR settings. In January 1, 2022, publication of one-week and two-month USD LIBOR ceased,
and regulated U.S. financial institutions are no longer permitted to enter into new contracts referencing any LIBOR settings.
The Alternative Reference Rates
Committee (the “ARRC”), a committee convened by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York,
has proposed replacing USD LIBOR with SOFR, a new index based on trading in overnight repurchase agreements. The methodology of
calculating SOFR is different to that of LIBOR, as SOFR is calculated using short-term repurchase agreements backed by U.S. Treasury
securities and is backward looking, while LIBOR is an estimated forward-looking rate and relies, to some degree, on the expert
judgment of submitting panel members. In addition since SOFR is a secured rate backed by government securities, it does not take
into account bank credit risk (as is the case with LIBOR). SOFR also may be more volatile than LIBOR. In July 2021, the ARRC formally
recommended the use of forward-looking term rates based on SOFR published by CME Group (the “Term SOFR”) on commercial
loans. While Term SOFR matches more closely the term structure and forward-looking features of LIBOR, as a calculation based on
a secured overnight financing rate it still does not match the credit risk-sensitive nature of LIBOR as an unsecured term rate.
At this time, there is no guarantee that such transition from LIBOR to SOFR will not result in financial market disruptions.
As of December 31, 2022, our
obligations under our secured credit facilities, which accrue interest based on LIBOR with maturities extending past June 30, 2023
amounted to approximately $228.1 million. We have already agreed upon the replacement benchmark on $10.5 million of such facilities
and will need to negotiate the replacement benchmark rate with SOFR on the remainder of the facilities. In addition, any other
contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business, which currently refer to, use or include LIBOR may also be impacted.
According to current market practice, existing LIBOR-based borrowings will be converted to SOFR-based plus a spread adjustment,
to account for the different methodology of the two benchmark rates. The differences between LIBOR and SOFR, plus the recommended
spread adjustment, could result in higher interest costs than if LIBOR remained available, which could have a material adverse
effect on our operating results, cash flows, financial condition, and ability to pay dividends.
Our financial instruments may
require changes to documentation as well as enhancements and modifications to systems, controls, procedures and models, which could
present operational and legal challenges for us and counterparties. There can be no assurance that we will be able to modify all
existing financial instruments before the discontinuation of LIBOR which could have a material adverse effect on our financing
costs, and as a result, our financial condition, operating results and cash flows.
We are and will be exposed
to floating interest rates and may selectively enter into interest rate derivative contracts, which can result in higher than market
interest rates and charges against our income.
The loans under our credit facilities
are generally advanced at a floating rate based on LIBOR or SOFR, which is volatile and can affect the amount of interest payable
on our debt, and which, in turn, could have an adverse effect on our earnings and cash flow. In
order to manage our exposure
to interest rate fluctuations, we may, from time to time, use interest rate derivatives to effectively fix some of our floating
rate debt obligations. As of February 24, 2023, we do not have any interest rate hedging arrangements in place. Our financial condition
could be materially adversely affected at any time that we have not entered into interest rate hedging arrangements to hedge our
exposure to the interest rates applicable to our credit facilities and any other financing arrangements we may enter into in the
future. Moreover, even if we have entered into interest rate swaps or other derivative instruments for purposes of managing our
interest rate exposure, our hedging strategies may not be effective and we may incur substantial losses. The use of interest rate
derivatives may affect our results through mark to market valuation of these derivatives, while adverse movements in interest rate
derivatives may require us to post cash as collateral, which may impact our liquidity.
Entering into swaps and derivatives
transactions is inherently risky and presents various possibilities for incurring significant losses. The derivatives strategies
that we employ in the future may not be successful or effective, and we could, as a result, incur substantial additional interest
costs. The effectiveness of interest rate derivative contracts may also be impacted by the transition from LIBOR to SOFR or other
alternative rates.
Because we generate substantially
all of our revenues in U.S. dollars but incur a material portion of our expenses in other currencies, including our management
fees and investments in Scrubbers and BWTS, and also incur a material portion of our indebtedness and our capital expenditure requirements
in other currencies, exchange rate fluctuations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
We generate substantially all
of our revenues in U.S. dollars, but in 2022 we incurred approximately 26.6% of our vessel operating expenses in currencies other
than the U.S. dollar, of which 61.1% was denominated in Euros. In addition, we incurred the majority of our management fees in
Euros, and this will continue in the future. In February 2022, one of our subsidiaries issued a non-amortising unsecured bond in
the amount of €100,000,000, which is listed in the Athens Stock Exchange (the “Bond”). The Bond is guaranteed
by us and pays a coupon of 2.95% on a semi-annual basis. It matures in February 2027 and may be redeemed at our option in part
or in full after February 2024, subject to the payment of a premium ranging from 1.5% to 0.5% of the redeemed amount depending
on the timing of the redemption. We have entered into arrangements to counterbalance the currency risk arising from the Bond redemption
for 40% of the outstanding amount, while we have not entered into any arrangements to counterbalance the currency risk arising
from the coupon payments. As of December 31, 2022, all of our secured indebtedness, as well as the amounts due under the contracts
for the acquisition of the nine newbuild vessels currently in our orderbook, were denominated in U.S. dollars. We have historically
entered into shipbuilding contracts and purchase of vessels whereby part of the contract price was payable in Japanese yen and
Singapore dollars. Also, new credit facilities and financing agreements, purchase of vessels or newbuild contracts may be denominated
in or permit conversion into currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The use of different currencies could lead to fluctuations
in our net income due to changes in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies, in particular the Euro and the Japanese
yen. We have only partially hedged our overall currency exposure, and, as a result, our results of operations and financial condition,
denominated in U.S. dollars, and our ability to pay dividends, could suffer.
Inflation pressures across
the world economies and the rise in central bank rates could lead to subpar economic growth, declining market conditions and eventually
contraction for a number of emerging and advanced economies, hamper the fragile recovery of world economies and could adversely
affect dry-bulk world trade and freight markets, the cost of our capital, financing, loan and credit facilities and the cost of
our overall indebtedness which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The world economy is facing a
number of challenges related to geopolitical tensions, which have or may be developed to conflicts such as the Russian war in Ukraine
and tensions between the United States and China in relation to Taiwan and the South China Sea region, as well as pandemics that
have occured (Covid-19), or may appear in the future. Such events have led to large scale disruptions including disruptions in
the supply chains, energy and commodity markets and subsequently to a high inflation environment. Global inflation is expected
to reach 8.8% in 2022 and there are projections of a gradual reduction to 6.6% in 2023, still well above pre-pandemic levels of
about 3.5%, as per the International Monetary Fund January 2023 World Economic Outlook forecast.
Central banks have increased
interest rates to combat inflation. The Federal Reserve has aggressively increased the federal fund interest rate by 450 basis
points during the last twelve months to 4.75%, and the European Central Bank has raised interest rates by 300 basis points to 3.25%
during the last twelve months, both with the intention to either further increase and/or maintain such high interest rates as long
as it is needed.
As a result, global economic
conditions and global financial markets have been, and continue to be, volatile and certain countries may face recession and uncertainty
surrounding the potential for continued economic growth, which could lead to reduced demand for transportation of dry-bulk commodities
and reduced charter rates. Global growth is projected to fall from an estimated 3.4% in 2022 to 2.9% in 2023 as per the International
Monetary Fund January 2023 World Economic Outlook forecast.
Tighter monetary conditions and
lower growth or recession as a result of the inflationary environment could potentially affect the financial and debt stability. We
cannot predict how long the current global inflationary conditions and high interest rates will last. In addition, the recent developments
in Ukraine led to increased economic uncertainty amidst fears of a more generalized military conflict or further significant inflationary
pressures, due to the increases in fuel prices following the sanctions imposed on Russia. Industry-wide inflationary pressures
may affect the shipping industry in general and dry-bulk shipping specifically and could adversely affect our business and financial
results by reducing our revenue due to low freight market conditions, increasing the costs of financing, loan and credit facilities,
the cost of our operating expenses including our crew cost and our overall indebtedness, which could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Restrictive covenants in our
existing credit facilities and financing agreements including our Bond, impose, and any future credit facilities and financing
agreements will impose, financial and other restrictions on us, and any breach of these covenants could result in the acceleration
of our indebtedness and foreclosure on our vessels.
We have substantial indebtedness.
As of December 31, 2022, we had $422.6 million outstanding under our credit facilities and financing agreements.
Our existing credit facilities
and financing agreements impose, and any future credit facility and financing agreement will impose, operating and financial restrictions
on us. These restrictions generally limit our ability to, among other things:
|
~ |
pay dividends if an event of default has occurred and is continuing or would occur as a result of the payment of such dividend; |
|
~ |
enter into certain long-term charters without the lenders’ consent; |
|
~ |
incur additional indebtedness, including through the issuance of guarantees; |
|
~ |
change the flag, class or management of the vessel mortgaged under such facility or terminate or materially amend the management agreement relating to such vessel; |
|
~ |
create liens on their assets; |
|
~ |
make loans; |
|
~ |
make investments; |
|
~ |
make capital expenditures; |
|
~ |
undergo a change in ownership or control or permit a change in ownership and control of our Managers; |
|
~ |
sell the vessel mortgaged under such facility; and |
|
~ |
change our chief executive officer. |
Therefore, we may need to seek
permission from our lenders in order to engage in some corporate actions. Our lenders’ interests may be different from ours,
and we cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain our lenders’ permission when needed. This may limit our ability to
pay dividends to our shareholders, finance our future operations or pursue business opportunities.
Certain of our existing credit
facilities require our subsidiaries to maintain financial ratios and satisfy financial covenants. Depending on the credit facility,
certain of our subsidiaries are subject to financial ratios and covenants requiring that these subsidiaries:
|
~ |
ensure that the market value of the vessel mortgaged under the applicable credit facility, determined in accordance with the terms of that facility, does not fall below 112%, 115%, 120% or 135%, as the case may be (the “Minimum Value Covenant”); |
|
~ |
maintain at all times a minimum cash balance per vessel with the respective lender from $200,000 to $500,000 as the case may be; and |
|
~ |
ensure that we comply with certain financial covenants under the guarantees described below. |
In addition, under our loan agreements
or under guarantees we have entered into with respect to certain of our subsidiaries’ credit facilities including our Bond,
we are subject to financial covenants. Depending on the facility, these financial covenants include the following as of February
24, 2023:
|
~ |
our total consolidated liabilities divided by our total consolidated assets (based on the market value of all vessels owned or leased on a finance lease taking into account their employment, and the book value of all other assets), must not exceed 85% (the “Consolidated Leverage Covenant”); |
|
~ |
our total consolidated assets (based on the market value of all vessels owned or leased on a finance lease taking into account their employment, and the book value of all other assets) less our total consolidated liabilities must not be less than $150 million (the “Net Worth Covenant”); |
|
~ |
our ratio of its EBITDA over consolidated interest expense must not be less than 2.0:1, on a trailing 12 months’ basis (the “EBITDA Covenant”); |
|
~ |
a minimum of 30% or 35%, as the case may be, of our voting and ownership rights shall remain directly or indirectly beneficially owned by the Hajioannou family for the duration of the relevant credit facilities and in the case of one facility, Polys Hajioannou is required to beneficially hold a minimum of 20% of the voting and ownership rights (the “Control Covenant”): and |
|
~ |
payment of dividends is subject to no event of default having occurred and be continuing or would occur as a result of the payment of such dividends. |
Failure to meet our payment and
other obligations or to maintain compliance with the applicable financial covenants could lead to defaults under our secured credit
facilities. Our lenders could then accelerate our indebtedness and foreclose on the vessels in our fleet securing those credit
facilities. The loss of these vessels would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
The declaration and payment
of dividends will always be subject to the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on a number of factors. Our board
of directors may not declare dividends in the future.
In March 2022, we declared and
paid a cash dividend of $0.05 per share of Common Stock, and have since declared and paid another four consecutive cash dividends,
each of $0.05 per share of Common Stock. The March 2022 dividend was the first one we paid on our shares of Common Stock since
August 2015. The declaration and payment of future dividends, if any, will always be subject to the discretion of the Board of
Directors of the Company. There is no guarantee that the Company’s Board of Directors will determine to issue cash dividends
in the future. The timing and amount of any dividends declared will depend on, among other things: (i) the
Company’s earnings, fleet
employment profile, financial condition and cash requirements and available sources of liquidity; (ii) decisions in relation to
the Company’s growth, fleet renewal and leverage strategies; (iii) provisions of Marshall Islands and Liberian law governing
the payment of dividends; (iv) restrictive covenants in the Company’s existing and future debt instruments; and (v) global
economic and financial conditions. Therefore, we might continue not paying dividends on our shares of Common Stock in the future.
There may be a high degree of
variability from period to period in the amount of cash, if any, that is available for the payment of dividends based upon, among
other things:
|
~ |
the rates we obtain from our charters as well as the rates obtained upon the expiration of our existing charters; |
|
~ |
the level of our operating costs; |
|
~ |
the level of our general and administrative costs; |
|
~ |
the number of unscheduled off-hire days and the timing of, and number of days required for, scheduled drydocking of our ships; |
|
~ |
vessel acquisitions and related financings; |
|
~ |
level of indebtedness; |
|
~ |
restrictions in our loan and credit facilities and in any future debt facilities; |
|
~ |
prevailing global and regional economic and political conditions; |
|
~ |
the effect of governmental regulations and maritime self-regulatory organization standards on the conduct of our business; |
|
~ |
the amount of cash reserves established by our board of directors; and |
|
~ |
restrictions under Marshall Islands and Liberian law. |
We may incur expenses or liabilities
or be subject to other circumstances in the future that reduce or eliminate the amount of cash that we have available for distribution
as dividends, if any. Our growth and fleet renewal strategies contemplate that we will finance the acquisition of our contracted
newbuilds or selective acquisitions of second-hand vessels through a combination of cash on hand, our operating cash flow and debt
financing or equity financing. If financing is not available to us on acceptable terms, our board of directors may decide to finance
or refinance such acquisitions with a greater percentage of cash from operations to the extent available, which would reduce or
even eliminate the amount of cash available for the payment of dividends. We may also enter into other agreements that will restrict
our ability to pay dividends.
Under the terms of certain of
our existing credit facilities, we are not permitted to pay dividends if an event of default has occurred and is continuing or
would occur as a result of the payment of such dividend. We expect that any future credit facilities will also have restrictions
on the payment of dividends. In addition, cash dividends on our Common Stock are subject to the priority of dividends on the 804,950
outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Shares and 3,195,050 outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Shares as of December 31,
2022.
The laws of the Republic of Liberia
and of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, where our vessel-owning subsidiaries are incorporated, generally prohibit the payment
of dividends other than from surplus or net profits, or while a company is insolvent or would be rendered insolvent by the payment
of such a dividend. Our subsidiaries may not have sufficient funds, surplus or net profits to make distributions to us. In addition,
under guarantees we have entered into with respect to certain of our subsidiaries’ existing credit and loan facilities, we
are subject to financial and other covenants, which may limit our ability to pay dividends. We also may not have sufficient surplus
or net profits in the future to pay dividends.
The amount of cash we generate
from our operations may differ materially from our net income or loss for the period, which will be affected by non-cash items.
We may incur other expenses or liabilities that could reduce or eliminate the cash available for distribution as dividends. As
a result of these and the other factors mentioned above, we may pay dividends during periods when we record losses and may not
pay dividends during periods when we record net income.
We are a holding company and
we depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to distribute funds to us in order to make dividend payments.
We are a holding company and
our subsidiaries, which are all wholly-owned by us, conduct all of our operations and own all of our operating assets. We have
no significant assets other than the equity interests in our wholly-owned subsidiaries and cash and cash equivalents held by us.
As a result, our ability to make dividend payments depends on our subsidiaries and their ability to distribute funds to us. The
ability of a subsidiary to make these distributions could be affected by a claim or other action by a third party, including a
creditor, and the laws of the Republic of Liberia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands where our vessel-owning subsidiaries are
incorporated, and of the Republic of Cyprus, where one of our subsidiaries, the holding company of four of our vessel-owning subsidiaries,
is incorporated, which regulate the payment of dividends by companies. If we are unable to obtain funds from our subsidiaries,
our board of directors may exercise its discretion not to declare or pay dividends.
We depend on our Managers
to operate our business and our business could be harmed if our Managers fail to perform their services satisfactorily.
Pursuant to our management agreements
with our Managers (the “Management Agreements”), our Managers provide us with technical, administrative and commercial
services (including vessel maintenance, crewing, purchasing, shipyard supervision, insurance, assistance with regulatory compliance,
financial services and office space) and our executive officers. Our operational success depends significantly upon our Managers’
satisfactory performance of these services. Our business would be harmed if our Managers failed to perform these services satisfactorily.
In addition, if either of the Management Agreements were to be terminated, expire or if their terms were to be altered, our business
could be adversely affected, as we may not be able to immediately replace such services, and even if replacement services were
immediately available, the terms offered could be less favorable than those under our Management Agreements.
Our ability to compete for and
enter into charters and to expand our relationships with our existing charterers will depend largely on our relationship with our
Managers and their reputation and relationships in the shipping industry. If our Managers suffer material damage to their reputation
or relationships, it may harm our ability to:
|
~ |
renew existing charters upon their expiration; |
|
~ |
obtain new charters; |
|
~ |
successfully interact with shipyards during periods of shipyard construction constraints; |
|
~ |
obtain financing on commercially acceptable terms; |
|
~ |
maintain satisfactory relationships with our charterers and suppliers; and |
|
~ |
successfully execute our business strategies. |
If our ability to do any of the
things described above is impaired, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Although we may have rights against
our Managers if they default on their obligations to us, investors in us will have no recourse against our Managers.
Our Managers are permitted to
provide certain management services to affiliates and third parties under the specific restrictions of our Management Agreements.
Although our Managers are required to provide preferential treatment to our vessels with respect to chartering arrangements under
the Management Agreements, our Managers’ time and attention may be diverted from the management of our vessels in such circumstances.
Further, we will need to seek approval from our lenders to change our Managers.
Management fees are payable
to our Managers regardless of our profitability, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
Pursuant to our Management Agreements,
we pay our Managers a daily ship management fee of €875 per vessel and Safe Bulkers Management an annual ship management
fee of €3.5 million for providing commercial, technical and administrative services (see the section entitled “Item
5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects - A. Operating Results - General and Administrative Expenses” for more information).
In addition, we pay our Managers certain commissions and fees with respect to vessel purchases, sales and newbuilds. The management
fees do not cover expenses such as voyage expenses, vessel operating expenses, maintenance expenses, crewing costs, insurance premiums,
commissions and certain company administration expenses such as directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, legal
and accounting fees and other similar company administration expenses, which are reimbursed or paid by us. The management fees
are payable whether or not our vessels are employed, and regardless of our profitability, and we have no ability to require our
Managers to reduce the management fees if our profitability decreases, which could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations. The latest expiration date of the Management Agreements with our Managers is May
2027. We expect to enter into new agreements with the Managers upon their expiration; however, the terms upon which the new management
agreements will be entered into are unknown at this time and may be less favorable to the Company than those currently in place.
All of our Managers are privately
held companies, and there is little or no publicly available information about them; an investor could have little advance warning
of problems affecting our Managers that could have a material adverse effect on us.
The ability of our Managers to
continue providing services for our benefit will depend in part on their own financial strength. Circumstances beyond our control
could impair our Managers’ financial strength. Because our Managers are privately held, it is unlikely that information about
their financial strength would become public or available to us prior to any default by our Managers under the Management Agreements.
As a result, we may, and our investors might, have little advance warning of problems that affect our Managers, even though those
problems could have a material adverse effect on us.
Our chief executive officer
also controls our Managers, which could create conflicts of interest between us and our Managers.
Our chief executive officer,
Polys Hajioannou, controls both of our Managers. Polys Hajioannou, directly and through entities controlled by him, owns approximately
40.70% of our outstanding Common Stock as of February 24, 2023 (see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—A.
Major Shareholders” for more information). These relationships could create conflicts of interest between us, on the one
hand, and our Managers, on the other hand. These conflicts may arise in connection with the chartering, purchase, sale and operation
of the vessels in our fleet versus vessels owned or chartered-in by other companies affiliated with our Managers or our chief executive
officer. To the extent we elect not to exercise our right of first refusal with respect to any drybulk vessel that may be acquired
by companies affiliated with our chief executive officer, such companies could acquire and operate such drybulk vessels in competition
with us. In addition, although under our Management Agreements our Managers will be required to first provide us any chartering
opportunities in the drybulk sector, our Managers are not prohibited from giving preferential treatment in other areas of its management
to vessels that are beneficially owned by related parties. In addition, under our restrictive covenant arrangements with Mr. Hajioannou
and certain entities affiliated with him, he and such entities may own, operate or finance a maximum of eight drybulk vessels on
the water at any one time or enter into an unlimited number of contracts with shipyards for newbuild drybulk vessels as part of
his estate or family planning. Any such drybulk vessels are not required to be managed by either of our Managers, and Mr. Hajioannou
and his related entities are not required to first provide chartering opportunities to us with respect to such vessels. Additionally,
our restrictive covenant arrangements permit Mr. Hajioannou to acquire up to a 35% ownership stake in any Minority Invested Business
(as defined below) developed from a permitted acquisition, subject to certain requirements, including a commitment that, unless
approved by the majority of our independent directors, no drybulk vessels owned by such Minority Invested Business will be managed
by either of our Managers
or any other person or entity
in which Mr. Hajioannou has an ownership interest. These conflicts of interest may have an adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
While we adhere to high standards
of evaluating related party transactions, agreements between us and other affiliated entities may be challenged as less favorable
than agreements that we could obtain from unaffiliated third parties.
We have entered into various
transactions with Mr. Hajioannou, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and entities controlled by and/or affiliated with Mr.
Hajioannou. For example, in 2017, we sold one drybulk vessel to an entity owned by Mr. Hajioannou. While we believe this transaction
was properly evaluated and approved by an independent special committee of our board of directors, certain terms related to the
transaction, including price, may be challenged to be on terms that are less favorable to us than terms that would have otherwise
been agreed upon with unaffiliated third-parties. Future transactions with Mr. Hajioannou and entities controlled by and/or affiliated
with Mr. Hajioannou may undergo scrutiny by our shareholders, the media or others and result in a challenge of the terms associated
with any such transaction.
Our business depends upon
certain employees who may not necessarily continue to work for us; if such employees were no longer to be affiliated with us, our
business, financial condition and results of operation could suffer.
Our future success depends, to
a significant extent, upon our chief executive officer, Polys Hajioannou, and certain other members of our senior management and
of our Managers. Polys Hajioannou has substantial experience in the drybulk shipping industry and for over 30 years has worked
with us, our Managers and their predecessor. He and other members of our senior management and of our Managers manage our business
and their performance is crucial to the execution of our business strategies and to the growth and development of our business.
If these individuals were no longer to be affiliated with us or our Managers, or if we were to otherwise cease to receive advisory
services from them, we may be unable to recruit other employees with equivalent talent and experience, and our business and financial
condition could suffer. We do not maintain, and do not intend to maintain, “key man” life insurance on any of our executive
officers.
The provisions in our restrictive
covenant arrangements with our chief executive officer and certain entities affiliated with him restricting their ability to compete
with us, like restrictive covenants generally, may not be enforceable.
Our chief executive officer,
Polys Hajioannou, and certain entities affiliated with him have entered into restrictive covenant agreements with us under which
they are precluded from competing with us during either (i) with respect to Polys Hajioannou, the term of his service with us as
executive and director and for one year thereafter, or (ii) with respect to entities affiliated with Polys Hajioannou, during the
term of the Management Agreements and for one year following the termination of our Management Agreements, in each case subject
to certain exceptions. Courts generally do not favor the enforcement of such restrictions, particularly when they involve individuals
and could be construed as infringing on such individuals’ ability to be employed or to earn a livelihood. Our ability to
enforce these restrictions, should it ever become necessary, will depend upon the circumstances that exist at the time enforcement
is sought. A court may not enforce the restrictions as written by way of an injunction and we may not necessarily be able to establish
a case for damages as a result of a violation of the restrictive covenants.
Our vessels call on ports
located in Iran and Syria, which are identified by the United States government as state sponsors of terrorism and are subject
to United States economic sanctions, which could be viewed negatively by investors and adversely affect the trading price of our
Common Stock and Preferred Shares.
From time to time, vessels in
our fleet have called and/or may call on ports located in countries identified by the United States government as state sponsors
of terrorism and subject to United States economic sanctions. From January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020, vessels in our fleet
did not make any calls on ports in Iran and Syria out of a total of 809 calls made on worldwide ports. From January 1, 2021 through
December 31, 2021, vessels in our fleet did not make any calls on ports in Iran and Syria out of a total of 680 calls made on worldwide
ports. From January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022, vessels in our fleet did not make any calls on ports in Iran and Syria out
of a total of 690 calls made on worldwide ports. Iran and Syria are identified by the United States government as state sponsors
of terrorism. Although these designations and controls do not prevent our vessels from making calls on ports in these countries,
potential investors could view such port calls negatively, which could adversely affect our reputation and the market for our Common
Stock. Investor perception of the value of our Common Stock may be adversely affected by the consequences of war, the effects of
terrorism, civil unrest and governmental actions in these and surrounding countries.
Our policy is for our vessels
to avoid making calls on ports in Iran and Syria unless, in the case of Iran, the charterer represents to us that the cargo is
not in contravention with any E.U., U.S. or United Nation sanctions and the export of such cargo has been authorized by the Office
of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
If our vessels call on ports
located in countries that are subject to sanctions and embargoes imposed by the U.S. or other governments, it could adversely affect
our reputation and the market for our shares. The U.S. government and other authorities have made certain countries subject to
certain sanctions and embargoes or have identified countries or other authorities as state sponsors of terrorism. From time to
time, on charterers’ instructions, our vessels may call on ports located in such countries. Sanctions and embargo laws and
regulations vary in their application, as they do not all apply to the same covered persons or proscribe the same activities, and
such sanctions and embargo laws and regulations may be amended or strengthened over time. In addition, charterers and other parties
that we have previously entered into contracts with regarding our vessels may be affiliated with persons or entities that are now
or may become the subject of sanctions imposed by the U.S. government, the E.U. and/or other international bodies. If we determine
that such sanctions require us to terminate existing contracts or if we are found to be in violation of such sanctions, we may
suffer reputational harm and our results of operations may be adversely affected. Although
we believe that we have been
in compliance with all applicable sanctions and embargo laws and regulations, and intend to maintain such compliance, there can
be no assurance that we will be in compliance in the future, particularly as the scope of certain laws may be unclear and may be
subject to changing interpretation. Any such violation could result in fines, penalties or other sanctions that could severely
impact our ability to access U.S. capital markets and conduct our business and could result in some investors deciding, or being
required, to divest their interest, or not to invest, in our securities. For example, certain institutional investors may have
investment policies or restrictions that prevent them from holding securities of companies that have contracts with countries identified
by the U.S. government as state sponsors of terrorism. Additionally, some investors may decide to divest their interest, or not
to invest, in our company simply because we do business with companies that do business in sanctioned countries. The determination
by these investors not to invest in, or to divest, our shares may adversely affect the price at which our shares trade. Moreover,
our charterers may violate applicable sanctions and embargo laws and regulations as a result of actions that do not involve us
or our vessels, and those violations could in turn result in liability for the Company or negatively affect our reputation. In
addition, our reputation and the market for our securities may be adversely affected if we engage in certain other activities,
such as entering into charters with individuals or entities in countries subject to U.S. sanctions and embargo laws that are not
controlled by the governments of those countries, or engaging in operations associated with those countries pursuant to contracts
with third-parties that are unrelated to those countries or entities controlled by their governments.
See “Item 4. Information
on the Company—B. Business Overview—Disclosure of activities pursuant to Section 13(r) of the U.S. Securities Exchange
Act of 1934” for more information.
We are incorporated in the
Republic of the Marshall Islands, which does not have a well-developed body of corporate law; therefore, you may have more difficulty
protecting your interests than shareholders of a U.S. corporation.
Our corporate affairs are governed
by our articles of incorporation, our bylaws and by the Marshall Islands Business Corporations Act (“BCA”). The provisions
of the BCA resemble provisions of the corporation laws of a number of states in the United States. However, there have been few
judicial cases in the Republic of the Marshall Islands interpreting the BCA. The rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors
under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands are not as clearly established as the rights and fiduciary responsibilities
of directors under statutes or judicial precedent in existence in certain United States jurisdictions. The rights of shareholders
of companies incorporated in the Republic of the Marshall Islands may differ from the rights of shareholders of companies incorporated
in the United States. While the BCA provides that it is to be interpreted according to the non-statutory laws of the State of Delaware
and other states with substantially similar legislative provisions, there have been few, if any, court cases interpreting the BCA
in the Republic of the Marshall Islands and we cannot predict whether Marshall Islands courts would reach the same conclusions
as United States courts. Thus, you may have more difficulty in protecting your interests in the face of actions by our management,
directors or controlling shareholders than would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a United States jurisdiction which
has developed a more substantial body of case law in the corporate law area.
It may be difficult to serve
us with legal process or enforce judgments against us, our directors or our management.
We are incorporated under the
laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and our Managers’ business is operated primarily from their offices in Limassol,
Cyprus, Athens, Greece and Monaco. In addition, a majority of our directors and officers are or will be non-residents of the United
States, and all of our assets and a substantial portion of the assets of these non-residents are located outside the United States.
As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for you to bring an action against us or against these individuals in the United
States if you believe that your rights have been infringed under the securities laws or otherwise. You may also have difficulty
enforcing, both within and outside of the United States, judgments you may obtain in the United States courts against us or these
persons in any action, including actions based upon the civil liability provisions of United States federal or state securities
laws. There is also substantial doubt that the courts of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the Republic of Cyprus or Greece
would enter judgments in original actions brought in those courts predicated on United States federal or state securities laws.
We may be subject to lawsuits
for damages and penalties.
The nature of our business exposes
us to the risk of lawsuits for damages or penalties relating to, among other things, personal injury, property casualty and environmental
contamination. From time to time, we may be subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business, principally
personal injury and property casualty claims. We expect that these claims would be covered by insurance, subject to customary deductibles.
However, such claims, even if lacking merit, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources.
The smuggling of drugs or
other contraband onto our vessels may lead to governmental claims against us.
Under some jurisdictions, vessels
used for the conveyance of illegal drugs could subject the vessels to forfeiture to the government of such jurisdiction. Vessels
in our fleet may call in ports in South America and other areas where smugglers, during vessel operations, and without our knowledge,
may attempt to hide drugs and other contraband on those vessels, with or without the knowledge of crew members. To the extent our
vessels are found with contraband, whether inside or attached to the hull of our vessel and whether with or without the knowledge
of any member of the vessels’ crew, we may face governmental or other regulatory claims or penalties which could have an
adverse effect on our reputational, our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
Regulatory and legal risks
as a result of our global operations could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial
conditions.
Our global operations increase
both the number and the level of complexity of U.S. or foreign laws and regulations applicable
to us. These laws and regulations
include international labor laws; U.S. laws such as the FCPA and other laws and regulations established by the Office of Foreign
Assets Control; local laws such as the U.K. Bribery Act 2010; data privacy requirements like the European General Data Protection
Regulation, enforceable as of May 25, 2018; and the E.U.-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework, adopted by the European Commission on July
12, 2016. We may inadvertently breach some provisions of those laws and regulations which could result in cease of business activities,
criminal sanctions against us, our officers or our employees, fines and materially damage our reputation. In addition, detecting,
investigating and resolving such cases of actual or alleged violations may be expensive and time consuming for our senior management.
Risks Relating to Our Common Stock and Preferred
Shares |
|
Polys Hajioannou the largest
shareholder of the Company, is able to significantly influence the outcome of matters on which our shareholders are entitled to
vote and its interests may be different from yours.
As of February 24, 2023, Polys
Hajioannou owns or controls approximately 40.70%, of our outstanding Common Stock (see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related
Party Transactions – A. Major Shareholders” for more information). Polys Hajioannou is the largest shareholder of the
Company and is able to significantly influence the outcome of matters on which our shareholders are entitled to vote, including
the election of our entire board of directors and other significant corporate actions including mergers, sales of assets or other
similar transactions. The interests of Polys Hajioannou may be different from yours.
Our status as a foreign private
issuer within the rules promulgated under the Exchange Act exempts us from certain requirements of the SEC and NYSE.
We are a “foreign private
issuer” within the rules promulgated under the Exchange Act. Under the NYSE listing rules, a foreign private issuer may elect
to comply with the practice of its home country and to not comply with certain NYSE corporate governance requirements, including
the requirements that (a) a majority of the board of directors consist of independent directors, (b) a nominating and corporate
governance committee be established that is composed entirely of independent directors and has a written charter addressing the
committee’s purpose and responsibilities, (c) a compensation committee be established that is composed entirely of independent
directors and has a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities, (d) an annual performance evaluation
of the nominating and corporate governance and compensation committees be undertaken and (e) the obligation to obtain shareholder
approval in connection with certain issuances of authorized stock or the approval of, and material revisions to, equity compensation
plans. Moreover, we are not required to comply with certain requirements of the SEC that domestic issuers are required to comply
with, including (a) the rules under the Exchange Act requiring the filing with the SEC of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or current
reports on Form 8-K, (b) the sections of the Exchange Act regulating the solicitation of proxies, consents or authorizations in
respect of a security registered under the Exchange Act, (c) the provisions of Regulation FD aimed at preventing issuers from making
selective disclosures of material information and (d) the sections of the Exchange Act requiring insiders to file public reports
of their stock ownership and trading activities and establishing insider liability for profits realized from any “short-swing”
trading transaction (i.e., a purchase and sale, or sale and purchase, of the issuer’s equity securities within less than
six months). Therefore, you will not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to all NYSE
corporate governance requirements or SEC requirements.
For example, in reliance on the
foreign private issuer exemption to the NYSE listing rules, a majority of our board of directors may not consist of independent
directors; our board’s approach may therefore be different from that of a board with a majority of independent directors,
and as a result, the management oversight of our Company may be more limited than if we were subject to the NYSE listing rules.
Because of these exemptions, investors are not afforded the same protections or information generally available to investors holding
shares in public companies organized in the U.S.
See “Item 16G. Corporate
Governance” for more information.
Future sales of our Common
Stock could cause the market price of our Common Stock to decline and our existing shareholders may experience significant dilution.
We may issue additional shares
of our Common Stock in the future and our shareholders may elect to sell large numbers of shares held by them from time to time,
subject to applicable restrictions and limitations under Rule144 of the Securities Act.
In April 2011, we issued and
sold 5,000,000 shares of Common Stock in a public offering. The gross proceeds of the April 2011 public offering were approximately
$42.0 million. In March 2012, we issued and sold 5,750,000 shares of Common Stock in a public offering. The gross proceeds of the
March 2012 public offering were approximately $37.4 million. In November 2013, we issued and sold 5,750,000 shares of Common Stock
in a public offering. Concurrently with that public offering, we issued and sold 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock to an entity
associated with our chief executive officer, Polys Hajioannou, in a private placement. The gross proceeds of the November 2013
public offering and private placement were approximately $50.2 million. In December 2016, we issued and sold 15,640,000 shares
of Common Stock in a public offering, in which an entity associated with Polys Hajioannou purchased 2,727,272 shares of Common
Stock. The gross proceeds of the December 2016 public offering were approximately $17.2 million. In April 2017, we completed an
exchange offer (the “Exchange Offer”) for our Series B Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares, par value
$0.01 per share, liquidation preference $25.00 per share (“Series B Preferred Shares”), in which we issued an additional
2,212,508 shares of Common Stock to holders of Series B Preferred Shares who tendered such preferred shares in the Exchange Offer.
In November 2018, one of our
subsidiaries entered into a memorandum of agreement with an unaffiliated seller to acquire a Japanese-built, dry-bulk Post-Panamax
class resale newbuild vessel. We had the option to finance up to 50% of the purchase price
of the vessel through the issuance
of our Common Stock to the seller. In November 2018, November 2019 and April 2020, we exercised our option and issued 1,441,048,
3,963,964 and 2,951,699 shares of our Common Stock respectively to the seller, to finance the first installment of $3.3 million,
the second installment of $6.6 million and part of the third installment of $3.3 million, respectively of the purchase price of
the vessel.
Sales of a substantial number
of shares of our Common Stock in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, may depress the market price
for our Common Stock. These sales could also impair our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of our equity securities
in the future.
Our existing shareholders may
also experience significant dilution in the future as a result of any future offering.
We also entered into a registration
rights agreement in connection with our initial public offering with Vorini Holdings Inc., one of our principal shareholders, pursuant
to which we have granted it and certain of its transferees the right, under certain circumstances and subject to certain restrictions,
to require us to register under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), shares of our Common
Stock held by them. Under the registration rights agreement, Vorini Holdings Inc. and certain of its transferees have the right
to request us to register the sale of shares held by them on their behalf and may require us to make available shelf registration
statements permitting sales of shares into the market from time to time over an extended period. In addition, those persons have
the ability to exercise certain piggyback registration rights in connection with registered offerings initiated by us. Registration
of such shares under the Securities Act would, except for shares purchased by affiliates, result in such shares becoming freely
tradable without restriction under the Securities Act immediately upon the effectiveness of such registration.
The market price of our Common
Stock may be adversely affected by sales of substantial amounts of our Common Stock pursuant to our ATM Program.
In August 2020, the Company filed
a prospectus supplement with the SEC and entered into a sales agreement (the “Sales Agreement”) with a sales agent
(the “Sales Agent”), under which we may offer and sell shares of Common Stock from time to time up to aggregate net
offering proceeds of $23.5 million through an ATM Program. In May 2021, the Company filed a supplement to the August 2020 prospectus
supplement and increased its potential net offering proceeds under the ATM Program to $100.0 million. As of December 31, 2021,
the Company had offered to sell and had sold 19,417,280 shares of common stock and had received aggregate net offering proceeds
of $71.5 million under the ATM Program. The Company had not offered to sell and has not sold any additional common shares under
the ATM Program in the fourth quarter of 2021 or in 2022, as of February 24, 2023.
Subject to certain limitations
in the Sales Agreement and compliance with applicable law, we have the discretion to deliver notices to the sales agent at any
time throughout the term of the Sales Agreement. The number of shares that are sold by the Sales Agent after delivering a notice
will fluctuate based on the market price of the shares of Common Stock during the sales period and limits we set with the Sales
Agent. Because the sales of the shares offered hereby are made directly into the market or in negotiated transactions, the prices
which we sell these shares will vary and these variations may be significant. Purchasers of the shares we sell, as well as our
existing shareholders, will experience significant dilution if we sell shares at prices significantly below the price at which
they invested. Furthermore, all of our shares of Common Stock sold in the offering will be freely tradable without restriction
or further registration under the Securities Act. As a result of this offering, a substantial number of our shares of Common Stock
may be sold in the public market or may cause the perception that these sales could occur, either of, which may cause the market
price of our Common Stock to decline. This could make it more difficult for you to sell your shares of Common Stock at a time and
price that you deem appropriate and could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities.
We may adopt share repurchase
programs which may affect the market for our Common Stock and Preferred Shares, including affecting our share price or increasing
share price volatility.
The Company may, from time to
time, repurchase Common Stock or Preferred Shares in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, depending
upon several factors, including market and business conditions, the trading price of our Common Stock and other investment opportunities.
The repurchase programs may be limited, suspended or discontinued at any time without prior notice. In June 2019, we announced
a share repurchase program under which we could, from time to time, purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of Common Stock in the aggregate
on the open market. In March 2020, we expanded such share repurchase program to provide for the repurchase of an additional 1,500,000
shares of Common Stock on the open market. In March 2020, we announced a preferred share repurchase program under which we could,
from time to time, purchase up to 100,000 shares of each of our Series C Preferred Shares and Series D Preferred Shares on the
open market. Additionally, In March 2022, we issued a notice of redemption of 1,492,554 of the outstanding Series C Preferred Shares.
The redemption was completed on April 29, 2022, at a redemption price of $25.00 per Series C Preferred Share in the amount of $37.3
million plus all accumulated and unpaid dividends to, but excluding, the redemption date, of $0.7 million. Following the redemption,
there were 804,950 Series C Preferred Shares outstanding, as of December 31, 2022. In June 2022, we authorized a program under
which we could, from time to time, purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of Common Stock in the aggregate on the open market. As of February
24, 2023, 2,807,418 shares of common stock had been repurchased and cancelled under the repurchase program. Repurchases of our
Common Stock or Preferred Shares pursuant to any repurchase programs could affect our stock price and increase trading volatility.
There is no guarantee of a
continuing public market for you to resell our common or preferred stock.
Our Common Stock and Preferred
Shares trade on the NYSE. We cannot assure you that an active and liquid public market for our Common Stock or Preferred Shares
will continue, which would likely have a negative effect on the price of our Common Stock or Preferred Shares, as applicable, and
impair your ability to sell or purchase our Common Stock or Preferred Shares, as applicable, when you wish to do so.
If our Common Stock falls below
the continued listing standard of $1.00 per share or otherwise fails to satisfy any of the NYSE continued listing requirements,
and if we are unable to cure such deficiency during any subsequent cure period, our Common Stock could be delisted from the NYSE.
If our Common Stock ultimately were to be delisted for any reason, we could face significant material adverse consequences, including:
|
~ |
limited availability of market quotations for our Common Stock; |
|
~ |
a limited amount of news and analyst coverage for us; |
|
~ |
a decreased ability for us to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future; |
|
~ |
limited liquidity for our shareholders due to thin trading; and |
|
~ |
loss of preferential tax rates for dividends received by certain non-corporate United States holders, loss of “mark-to-market” election by United States holders in the event we are treated as a “passive foreign investment company”, and loss of our tax exemption under Section 883 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). |
We have adopted a shareholders
rights plan which could make it more difficult for a third-party to acquire us while the plan remains in effect.
We have in effect a shareholders
rights plan that is intended to enable all shareholders to realize the long-term value of their investment in the Company and to
protect against any person or group from gaining control of the Company through coercive or otherwise unfair takeover tactics.
The shareholders rights plan is not intended to deter offers that are fair and otherwise in the best interests of the Company’s
shareholders. In connection with the Company’ s adoption of the shareholders rights plan, the Company declared a dividend
of one preferred share purchase right (a “Right”) for each outstanding share of our Common Stock. The Rights will be
exercisable on the earlier of (1) the tenth day after the public announcement that a person or group acquires ownership of 10%
or more of the Company’s Common Stock without the approval of the Board or (2) the tenth business day (or such later date
as determined by the Board) after a person or group announces a tender or exchange offer which would result in that person or group
holding 10% or more of the Company’s Common Stock. Polys Hajioannou, the Company’s Chairman and chief executive officer,
and his brother Nicolaos Hadjioannou are excluded persons for purposes of the shareholders rights plan and shares of our Common
Stock held by Mr. Hajioannou or Mr. Hadjioannou and entities controlled by and/or affiliated or associated with Mr. Hajioannou
or Mr. Hadjioannou or members or their respective families are not subject to the restrictions of the shareholders rights plan.
The Rights also become exercisable
if a person or group that already beneficially owns 10% or more of our Common Stock (other than one or more of the excluded persons
described above) acquires any additional shares of our Common Stock without the approval of the Board. If the Rights become exercisable,
all Rights holders (other than the person or group triggering the Rights) will be entitled to acquire certain of our securities
at a substantial discount. The Rights may substantially dilute the stock ownership of a person or group attempting to take over
our company without the approval of the Board, and the rights plan could make it more difficult for a third-party to acquire our
company or a significant percentage of our outstanding shares of Common Stock, without first negotiating with the Board.
Anti-takeover provisions in
our organizational documents and Management Agreements could make it difficult for our shareholders to replace or remove our current
board of directors and together with our adoption of a shareholders rights plan could have the effect of discouraging, delaying
or preventing a merger or acquisition, which could adversely affect the market price of the shares of our Common Stock.
Several provisions of our articles
of incorporation and bylaws could make it difficult for our shareholders to change the composition of our board of directors in
any one year, preventing them from changing the composition of our management. In addition, the same provisions may discourage,
delay or prevent a merger or acquisition that shareholders may consider favorable. These provisions:
|
~ |
authorize our board of directors to issue “blank check” preferred stock without shareholder approval; |
|
~ |
provide for a classified board of directors with staggered, three-year terms; |
|
~ |
prohibit cumulative voting in the election of directors; |
|
~ |
authorize the removal of directors only for cause; |
|
~ |
prohibit shareholder action by written consent unless the written consent is signed by all shareholders entitled to vote on the action; |
|
~ |
establish advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted on by shareholders at shareholder meetings; and |
|
~ |
provide that special meetings of our shareholders may only be called by the chairman of our board of directors, chief executive officer or a majority of our board of directors. |
Pursuant to our shareholders
rights plan any person that attempts to acquire us without the approval of our board of directors may have their shareholdings
substantially diluted.
Each Manager may terminate the
applicable Management Agreement prior to the end of its term if there is a change in directors after which at least one of the
members of our board of directors is not a continuing director. “Continuing directors” means, as of any date of determination,
any member of our board of directors who was (a) a member of our board of directors on May 29, 2018 or (b) nominated for election
or elected to our board of directors with the approval of a majority of the directors then in office who were either directors
on May 29, 2018 or whose nomination or election was previously so approved. In the event that either Management Agreement is so
terminated, the Company shall pay to Safe Bulkers Management an amount in cash equal to the Management Fees paid or payable to
either Manager, in the aggregate, during the 36 months preceding the applicable termination.
These anti-takeover provisions,
including the provisions of our shareholders rights plan, could substantially impede the ability of public shareholders to benefit
from a change in control and, as a result, may adversely affect the market price of our Common
Stock and your ability to realize
any potential change of control premium.
The amount of cash we have
available for dividends on or to redeem our Preferred Shares will not depend solely on our profitability.
The actual amount of cash we
will have available for dividends or to redeem our Preferred Shares will depend on many factors, including the following:
|
~ |
changes in our operating cash flow, capital expenditure requirements, working capital requirements and other cash needs; |
|
~ |
restrictions under our existing or future credit facilities or any future debt securities, including existing restrictions under our existing credit facilities on our ability to pay dividends if an event of default has occurred and is continuing or if the payment of the dividend would result in an event of default and restrictions on our ability to redeem securities; |
|
~ |
the amount of any cash reserves established by our board of directors; and |
|
~ |
restrictions under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, which generally prohibits the payment of dividends other than from surplus (retained earnings and the excess of consideration received for the sale of shares above the par value of the shares) or while a company is insolvent or would be rendered insolvent by the payment of such a dividend. |
The amount of cash we generate
from our operations may differ materially from our net income or loss for the period, which will be affected by non-cash items,
and our board of directors in its discretion may elect not to declare any dividends. As a result of these and the other factors
mentioned above, we may pay dividends during periods when we record losses and may not pay dividends during periods when we record
net income.
The laws of the Republic of Liberia
and of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, where our vessel-owning subsidiaries are incorporated, generally prohibit the payment
of dividends other than from surplus or net profits, or while a company is insolvent or would be rendered insolvent by the payment
of such a dividend. Our subsidiaries may not have sufficient funds, surplus or net profits to make distributions to us. In addition,
under guarantees we have entered into with respect to certain of our subsidiaries’ existing credit facilities, we are subject
to financial and other covenants, which may limit our ability to pay dividends and redeem the Preferred Shares. These and future
agreements may limit our ability to pay dividends on and to redeem the Preferred Shares. We also may not have sufficient surplus
or net profits in the future to pay dividends.
Our Preferred Shares represent
perpetual equity interests, they are subordinate to our debt and your interests could be diluted by the issuance of additional
preferred shares, including additional Preferred Shares and by other transactions.
The Preferred Shares represent
perpetual equity interests in us and, unlike our indebtedness, will not give rise to a claim for payment of a principal amount
at a particular date. As a result, holders of the Preferred Shares may be required to bear the financial risks of an investment
in the Preferred Shares for an indefinite period of time. Our Preferred Shares are subordinate to all of our existing and future
indebtedness and to any other senior securities we may issue in the future with respect to assets available to satisfy claims against
us. Each series of our Preferred Shares rank pari passu with one another and any class or series of capital stock established after
the original issue date of such preferred shares that is not expressly subordinated or senior to such preferred shares as to the
payment of dividends and amounts payable upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up. As of December 31, 2022, we had aggregate
debt outstanding of $422.6 million, of which $45.7 million payable within the next 12 months. Our existing indebtedness restricts,
and our future indebtedness may include restrictions on, our ability to pay dividends on or redeem preferred shares. In March 2022,
we issued a notice of redemption of 1,492,554 of the outstanding Series C Preferred Shares. The redemption was completed on April
29, 2022, at a redemption price of $25.00 per Series C Preferred Share in the amount of $37.3 million plus all accumulated and
unpaid dividends to, but excluding, the redemption date, of $0.7 million. Following the redemption, there were 804,950 Series C
Preferred Shares outstanding, as of December 31, 2022. Our articles of incorporation currently authorize the issuance of up to
20,000,000 shares of blank check preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, of which, as of December 31, 2022, 804,950 shares
of Series C Preferred Shares and 3,195,050 shares of Series D Preferred Shares were issued and outstanding. Of the blank check
preferred stock, 1,000,000 shares have been designated Series A Participating Preferred Stock in connection with our adoption of
a shareholders rights plan as described under “Item 10. Additional Information—B. Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws—Shareholders
Rights Plan.” The issuance of additional preferred shares on a parity with or senior to the Preferred Shares would dilute
the interests of holders of such shares, and any issuance of preferred shares senior to such preferred shares or of additional
indebtedness could affect our ability to pay dividends on, redeem or pay the liquidation preference on our Preferred Shares.
The liquidation preference
amount on our Preferred Shares is fixed and Preferred shareholders will have no right to receive any greater payment regardless
of the circumstances.
The payment due upon a liquidation
to holders of any series of our Preferred Shares is fixed at the redemption preference of $25.00 per share plus accumulated and
unpaid dividends to the date of liquidation. If, in the case of our liquidation, there are remaining assets to be distributed after
payment of this amount, you will have no right to receive or to participate in these amounts. Furthermore, if the market price
for our Preferred Shares is greater than the liquidation preference, Preferred shareholders will have no right to receive the market
price from us upon our liquidation.
Holders of Preferred Shares
have extremely limited voting rights.
The voting rights of holders
of Preferred Shares are extremely limited. Our Common Stock is the only class or series of our shares carrying full voting rights.
Holders of Preferred Shares have no voting rights other than the ability (voting together as a class with all other classes or
series of preferred stock upon which like voting rights have been conferred and are exercisable, including all of the Preferred
Shares), subject to certain exceptions, to elect one director if dividends for six quarterly dividend periods (whether
or not consecutive) payable on
our Preferred Shares are in arrears and certain other limited protective voting rights.
Our ability to pay dividends
on and to redeem our Preferred Shares is limited by the requirements of the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the laws
of the Republic of Liberia and existing and future agreements.
The laws of the Republic of Liberia
and of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, where our vessel-owning subsidiaries are incorporated, generally prohibit the payment
of dividends other than from surplus or net profits, or while a company is insolvent or would be rendered insolvent by the payment
of such a dividend. Our subsidiaries may not have sufficient funds, surplus or net profits to make distributions to us. In addition,
under guarantees we have entered into with respect to certain of our subsidiaries’ existing credit facilities, we are subject
to financial and other covenants, which may limit our ability to pay dividends and redeem the Preferred Shares. These and future
agreements may limit our ability to pay dividends on and to redeem the Preferred Shares. We also may not have sufficient surplus
or net profits in the future to pay dividends.
In addition to the following
risk factors, you should read “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Tax Considerations—Marshall Islands Tax Considerations,”
“Item 10. Additional Information—E. Tax Considerations—Liberian Tax Considerations,” and “Item 10.
Additional Information —E. Tax Considerations—United States Federal Income Tax Considerations” for a more complete
discussion of expected material Marshall Islands, Liberian and United States federal income tax consequences of owning and disposing
of our Common Stock and Preferred Shares.
We may earn shipping income
that will be subject to United States income tax, thereby reducing our cash available for distributions to you.
Under United States tax rules,
50% of our gross income attributable to shipping that begins or ends in the United States may be subject to a 4% United States
federal income tax (without allowance for deductions). The amount of this income may fluctuate, and we may not qualify for any
exemption from this United States tax. Many of our charters contain provisions that obligate the charterers to reimburse us for
this 4% United States tax. To the extent we are not reimbursed by our charterers, the 4% United States tax will decrease our cash
that is available for dividends.
For a more complete discussion,
see the section entitled “Item 10. Additional Information—Tax Considerations—E. United States Federal Income
Tax Considerations—Taxation of Operating Income in General.”
United States tax authorities
could treat us as a “passive foreign investment company,” which could have adverse United States federal income tax
consequences to United States holders.
We are an international company
that conducts business throughout the world. Tax laws and regulations are highly complex and subject to interpretation. A non-United
States corporation will be treated as a “passive foreign investment company,” or PFIC, for United States federal income
tax purposes if either (a) at least 75% of its gross income for any taxable year consists of certain types of “passive income”
or (b) at least 50% of the average value of the corporation’s assets produce or are held for the production of those types
of “passive income.” For purposes of these tests, “passive income” includes dividends, interest, gains
from the sale or exchange of investment property, and rents and royalties other than rents and royalties that are received from
unrelated parties in connection with the active conduct of a trade or business. For purposes of these tests, income derived from
the performance of services does not constitute “passive income.” United States shareholders of a PFIC are subject
to a disadvantageous United States federal income tax regime with respect to the income derived by the PFIC, the distributions
they receive from the PFIC, and the gain, if any, they derive from the sale or other disposition of their shares in the PFIC. In
particular, United States holders who are individuals would not be eligible for preferential tax rates otherwise applicable to
qualified dividends.
Based on our current operations
and anticipated future operations, we believe that it is more likely than not that we currently will not be treated as a PFIC.
In this regard, we intend to treat gross income we derive or are deemed to derive from our period time chartering activities as
services income, rather than rental income. Accordingly, we believe that our income from our period time chartering activities
should not constitute “passive income,” and that the assets we own and operate in connection with the production of
that income should not constitute passive assets.
There are legal uncertainties
involved in this determination. In Tidewater Inc. v. United States, 565 F.3d 299 (5th Cir. 2009), the United States Court
of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that, contrary to the position of the United States Internal Revenue Service, or the “IRS,”
in that case, and for purposes of a different set of rules under the Code, income received under a period time charter of vessels
should be treated as rental income rather than services income. If the reasoning of this case were extended to the PFIC context,
the gross income we derive or are deemed to derive from our period time chartering activities would be treated as rental income,
and we would probably be a PFIC. The IRS has stated that it disagrees with the holding in Tidewater and has specified that income
from period time charters should be treated as services income. However, the IRS’ statement with respect to the Tidewater
decision was an administrative action that cannot be relied upon or otherwise cited as precedent by taxpayers. In light of these
authorities, the IRS or a United States court may not accept the position that we are not a PFIC, and there is a risk that the
IRS or a United States court could determine that we are a PFIC. Moreover, we may constitute a PFIC for a future taxable year if
there were to be changes in our assets, income or operations.
If the IRS were to find that
we are or have been a PFIC for any taxable year, our United States shareholders would face adverse United States tax consequences.
See “Item 10. Additional Information—E. “Tax Considerations—United States Federal Income Tax Considerations—United
States Federal Income Taxation of United States Holders” for a more comprehensive discussion of the United States federal
income tax consequences to United States shareholders if we are treated as a PFIC.
ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY |
|
A. History and Development of the Company
Safe Bulkers, Inc. was incorporated in the Republic of the Marshall Islands on December
11, 2007, for the purpose of acquiring ownership of various subsidiaries that either owned or were scheduled to own vessels. Polys
Hajioannou our chief executive officer, has a long history of operating and investing in the international shipping industry,
including a long history of vessel ownership. Vassos Hajioannou, the late father of Polys Hajioannou, our chief executive officer,
first invested in shipping in 1958. Polys Hajioannou has been actively involved in the industry since 1987, when he joined the
predecessor of Safety Management.
Over the past 29 years under the leadership of Polys Hajioannou, we have sold or contracted
to sell 24 drybulk vessels during periods of what we viewed as favorable second-hand market conditions and have contracted to
acquire 61 drybulk newbuilds and 14 drybulk second-hand vessels. Also under his leadership, we have expanded the classes of drybulk
vessels in our fleet and the aggregate carrying capacity of our fleet has grown from 887,900 dwt prior to our initial public offering
in May 28, 2008 to 4,455,600 dwt as of February 24, 2023. Information on our capital expenditure requirements are discussed in
“Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources.” The quality and size
of our current fleet, together with our long-term relationships with several of our charter customers, are, we believe, the results
of our long-term strategy of maintaining a high quality fleet, our broad knowledge of the drybulk industry and our strong management
team. In addition to benefiting from the experience and leadership of Polys Hajioannou, we also benefit from the expertise of
our Managers which, along with their predecessor, have specialized in drybulk shipping since 1965. In June 2008, we completed
an initial public offering of our Common Stock in the U.S. and our Common Stock began trading on the NYSE. Our principal executive
office is located at Apt. D11, Les Acanthes, 6, Avenue des Citronniers MC 98000 Monaco. Our registered address in the Republic
of the Marshall Islands is Trust Company Complex, Ajeltake Road, Ajeltake Island, Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands, MH96960
and telephone numbers are +30 2 111 888 400 and +357 25 887 200. The name of our registered agent at such address is The Trust
Company of the Marshall Islands, Inc.
The SEC maintains an internet site at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, information
statements, and other information regarding issuers that we file electronically with the SEC.
B. Business Overview
We are an international provider of marine drybulk transportation services, transporting
bulk cargoes, particularly coal, grain and iron ore, along worldwide shipping routes for some of the world’s largest consumers
of marine drybulk transportation services. As of February 24, 2023, we had a fleet of 44 drybulk vessels, with an aggregate carrying
capacity of 4,455,600 dwt.
We employ our vessels on both period time charters and spot time charters, according
to our assessment of market conditions, with some of the world’s largest consumers of marine drybulk transportation services.
The vessels we deploy on period time charters provide us with relatively stable cash flow and high utilization rates, while the
vessels we deploy in the spot market allow us to maintain our flexibility in low charter market conditions. We are focused on
owning a modern, well-maintained fleet with the best designs in the shipping dry-bulk sector, targeting to reduce the environmental
impact from our operations. Over the past several years, we have made publicly available our annual sustainability report, where
we present in detail our environmental, social and governance strategy for the future, as well as the impact of our operations
and business on society and the environment. We believe that placing ESG at the very heart of our corporate strategy, will enable
us to continue to have access to capital, enjoy existing and future investors’ trust, reduce our fleets’ carbon footprint
and remain competitive in the dry bulk market.
Our ESG Strategy
During previous years, a number of countries and the IMO, have adopted regulatory frameworks
to reduce GHG emissions (increased energy efficiency standards for existing vessels and newbuilds, classification of vessels on
the basis of annual CO2 emissions, cap and trade regimes, carbon taxes, and incentives or mandates for renewable energy), due
to concerns over the risk of climate change. GHG emissions reduction measures for achieving 2030 goals, adopted by the IMO, EU
and other jurisdictions, may impose operational and financial restrictions such as carbon taxes or an emission trading system
ETS on the basis of CO2 emissions affecting more the less efficient vessels, reducing their trade and competitiveness, increasing
their environmental compliance costs, imposing additional energy efficiency investments, or even making such older, less energy
efficient vessels obsolete. Investor advocacy groups, certain institutional investors, investment funds, lenders and other market
participants are increasingly focused on ESG practices hindering access to capital and reallocating capital as a result of their
assessment of a company’s ESG practices.
Safe Bulkers, targeting to reduce the environmental impact of our operations, and increase
the sustainability of our business over time, has placed ESG at the heart of our corporate strategy and has undertaken significant
investments with the purpose of increasing our fleet’s environmental competitiveness and successfully meet society’s
expectations as to our proper role. In light of investors’ increased focus on ESG matters and in response to the GHG environmental
regulations, we have assessed the applicability of relevant energy efficiency measures, and decided to pursue a two-fold strategy:
i) a comprehensive fleet renewal program consisting of several newbuild orders with advanced energy efficiency characteristics,
the acquisition of younger second-hand vessels and the sale of older, less efficient vessels at suitable times and ii) a program
for environmental upgrading of existing vessels in our fleet during their dry-dockings.
As of February 24, 2023, our fleet consisted of 44 vessels, 12 of which are eco-ships
built after 2014, with superior energy efficiency characteristics compared to past-2014 designs, and three vessels built 2022
onwards, compliant with the most recent IMO GHG Phase 3 - NOx Tier III regulations. In addition, the Company’s outstanding
orderbook consists of nine newbuilds compliant with the IMO GHG Phase 3 - NOx Tier III regulations to be delivered four in 2023,
three in 2024 and two in the first half of 2025, and following all scheduled deliveries, reaching 24 vessels with improved energy
efficiency characteristics. The aggregate
capital expenditures for all twelve of our newbuilds exceeded $400 million.
During 2021, 2022 and until February 24, 2023, the Company has sold eight vessels with
total deadweight of 0.63 million tonnes and of 14.6 years average age with aggregate gross sale proceeds of $125.7 million and
acquired seven second-hand vessels with total deadweight of 0.97 million tonnes and of 9.2 years average age at an aggregate gross
acquisition cost of $187.0 million.
In parallel and as of February 24, 2023, we have completed environmental upgrades on
seven vessels and we are continuing our vessel environmental upgrade program which involves application of low friction paints
and installation of energy saving devices, scheduling to have upgraded 20 existing vessels by the end of 2023.
While we are investing in newbuilds, relatively young second-hand vessels and environmental
upgrades, we continue to monitor technological developments in relation to new environmentally friendly alternative marine fuels,
which we expect will play an increasingly important role in the next decade.
As of February 24, 2023, we have retrofitted our entire fleet with BWTS, have installed
Scrubbers on 19 of our vessels, a program which exceeded $80 million, and have agreed to install Scrubbers on the remaining four
of our Capesize class vessels, targeting to reduce SOx emissions compared to VLSFO and capitalizing on our Scrubber investments
in relation to price differential of VLSFO with HSFO.
On the financing front, during the last two years, we were one of the first shipping
companies which secured two sustainability-linked financings with separate lenders, of $160.0 million and for 11 of our vessels
in aggregate, both of which incorporated incentive discount or increase on interest rate, linked to independently verified predetermined
emission targets.
Further to the above, the Company is undertaking various actions in relation to its corporate
governance, personnel initiatives and the societies aiming towards continuously advanced integration. We believe that placing
ESG at the very heart of our corporate strategy will reduce our fleets’ carbon footprint and environmental impact, and in
parallel, improve our environmental-based competitiveness and social acceptance, allow us to enjoy existing and future investors’
trust and enable us to continue to have access to capital.
Our Fleet, Newbuilds and Employment Profile
As of February 24, 2023, our fleet comprised 44 vessels, of which 12 are Panamax class
vessels, 7 are Kamsarmax class vessels, 17 are Post-Panamax class vessels and 8 are Capesize class vessels, with an aggregate
carrying capacity of 4,455,600 dwt and an average age of 10.5 years.
Our orderbook consists of nine environmentally advanced Japanese and Chinese newbuild
vessels, of which eight Kamsarmax and one Post-Panamax class vessel, four of which are scheduled to be delivered to us in the
remainder of 2023, three in 2024 and two in the first half of 2025. All nine newbuilds are designed to comply with the requirements
of the IMO for EEDI Phase 3 and NOx Tier III. Assuming delivery of the nine contracted newbuild vessels through 2025, our fleet
by the first quarter of 2025, will comprise of 12 Panamax class vessels, 15 Kamsarmax class vessels, 18 Post-Panamax class vessels
and 8 Capesize class vessels, and the aggregate carrying capacity of our 53 vessels will be 5,199,600 dwt. The majority of vessels
in our fleet have sister ships with similar specifications. We believe using sister ships provides cost savings because it facilitates
efficient inventory management and allows for the substitution of sister ships to fulfill our period time charter obligations.
The table below presents
additional information with respect to our drybulk vessel fleet, including our newbuilds, and their deployment as of February 24,
2023. Certain vessels that are chartered on time charters at a daily gross charter rate linked to the Baltic Panamax Index
(“BPI”), or the Baltic Capesize Index (“BCI”), are shown in the below table with the special notation BPI or
BCI, plus or minus the relevant charter hire adjustments, where applicable. For certain vessels that are equipped with Scrubbers,
the benefit from Scrubber operation (the “Scrubber Benefit”) is calculated on the basis of the price differential
between HSFO and VLSFO for the specific voyage. In cases where the Scrubber Benefit can be calculated or it is a part of the charter
rate, it is included in the referenced charter rate. A special notation on the table is provided in cases where the Scrubber Benefit
is not part of the referenced charter rate and it cannot be calculated.
Vessel Name |
|
Dwt |
|
Year
Built1 |
|
Country of
Construction |
|
Charter
Type |
|
Charter
Rate2 |
|
Commis-
sions3 |
|
Charter
Period 4 |
|
Sister
Ship5 |
CURRENT FLEET |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Panamax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Katerina |
|
76,000 |
|
2004 |
|
Japan |
|
Period21 |
|
$10,950 + 50%
*101% BPI 74
4TC |
|
5.00% |
|
Sep 2022 - Aug 2023 |
|
A |
Maritsa |
|
76,000 |
|
2005 |
|
Japan |
|
Spot |
|
$8,250 |
|
5.00% |
|
Jan 2023 - Mar 2023 |
|
A |
Paraskevi 2 |
|
75,000 |
|
2011 |
|
Japan |
|
Period |
|
$15,250 |
|
5.00% |
|
Sep 2022 - Apr 2023 |
|
B |
Efrossini |
|
75,000 |
|
2012 |
|
Japan |
|
Spot |
|
$7,500 |
|
5.00% |
|
Feb 2023 - Mar 2023 |
|
B |
Zoe12 |
|
75,000 |
|
2013 |
|
Japan |
|
Period23 |
|
BPI 74 4TC * 104.25% |
|
5.00% |
|
Sep 2023 - Jul 2023 |
|
B |
Koulitsa
2 |
|
78,100 |
|
2013 |
|
Japan |
|
Spot |
|
$11,750 |
|
3.75% |
|
Jan
2023 - Mar 2023 |
|
|
|
Period30 |
|
BPI 74 4TC * 114% |
|
3.75% |
|
Mar
2023 - Nov 2023 |
|
|
Kypros
Land12 |
|
77,100 |
|
2014 |
|
Japan |
|
Period14 |
|
$13,800 |
|
3.75% |
|
Aug
2020 - Aug 2022 |
|
H |
|
BPI
82 5TC*
97% - $2,150 |
|
3.75% |
|
Aug
2022 - Aug 2025 |
|
Kypros
Sea |
|
77,100 |
|
2014 |
|
Japan |
|
Period14 |
|
$13,800 |
|
3.75% |
|
Jul 2020 - Jul 2022 |
|
H |
|
BPI
82 5TC *
97% - $2,150 |
|
3.75% |
|
Jul
2022 - Sep 2022 |
|
|
$24,123 |
|
3.75% |
|
Sep
2022 - Dec 2022 |
|
|
BPI
82 5TC *
97% - $2,150 |
|
3.75% |
|
Dec
2022 - Mar 2023 |
|
|
$13,502 |
|
3.75% |
|
Mar
2023 - Jun 2023 |
|
|
BPI
82 5TC *
97% - $2,150 |
|
3.75% |
|
Jun
2023 - Jul 2025 |
|
|
Kypros
Bravery |
|
78,000 |
|
2015 |
|
Japan |
|
Period13 |
|
$11,750 |
|
3.75% |
|
Aug
2020 - Aug 2022 |
|
I |
|
BPI
82 5TC*
97% - $2,150 |
|
3.75% |
|
Aug
2022 - Aug 2025 |
|
Kypros
Sky10 |
|
77,100 |
|
2015 |
|
Japan |
|
Period13 |
|
$11,750 |
|
3.75% |
|
Aug
2020 - Aug 2022 |
|
H |
|
BPI
82 5TC*
97% - $2,150 |
|
3.75% |
|
Aug
2022 - Aug 2025 |
|
Kypros
Loyalty |
|
78,000 |
|
2015 |
|
Japan |
|
Period13 |
|
$11,750 |
|
3.75% |
|
Jul
2020 - Jul 2022 |
|
I |
|
BPI 82 5TC * 97% - $2,150 |
|
3.75% |
|
Jul 2022 - Sep 2022 |
|
|
$23,153 |
|
3.75% |
|
Sep 2022 - Dec 2022 |
|
| | | | | | |
|
BPI 82 5TC * 97% - $2,150 |
|
3.75% |
|
Dec 2022 - Mar 2023 |
|
|
$12,726 |
|
3.75% |
|
Mar
2023 - Jun 2023 |
|
|
BPI
82 5TC *
97% - $2,150 |
|
3.75% |
|
Jun
2023 - Jul 2023 |
|
Kypros
Spirit10 |
|
78,000 |
|
2016 |
|
Japan |
|
Period14 |
|
$13,800 |
|
3.75% |
|
Aug
2020 - Aug 2022 |
|
I |
|
BPI
82 5TC*
97% - $2,150 |
|
3.75% |
|
Aug
2022 - Jul 2025 |
|
Kamsarmax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pedhoulas Merchant |
|
82,300 |
|
2006 |
|
Japan |
|
Period |
|
$25,900 |
|
3.75% |
|
Mar
2022 - Mar 2023 |
|
C |
Pedhoulas Leader |
|
82,300 |
|
2007 |
|
Japan |
|
Period32 |
|
BPI
82 5TC * 98% |
|
3.75% |
|
Jan
2023 - Oct 2023 |
|
C |
Pedhoulas Commander |
|
83,700 |
|
2008 |
|
Japan |
|
Period31 |
|
7,000
+ 50%
* BPI 82 5TC |
|
5.00% |
|
Dec
2022 - Jun 2023 |
|
|
Pedhoulas Cherry |
|
82,000 |
|
2015 |
|
China |
|
Period19 |
|
$24,000 |
|
5.00% |
|
Jul
2022 - Aug 2023 |
|
K |
Pedhoulas
Rose |
|
82,000 |
|
2017 |
|
China |
|
Period19,24 |
|
10,500
+ 50%
*104% BPI 82
5TC |
|
5.00% |
|
Nov
2022 - May 2023 |
|
K |
Pedhoulas Cedrus15 |
|
81,800 |
|
2018 |
|
Japan |
|
Period |
|
$21,000 |
|
5.00% |
|
Aug 2022 - Mar 2023 |
|
|
Vassos9 |
|
82,000 |
|
2022 |
|
Japan |
|
Period |
|
$21,500 |
|
5.00% |
|
Oct
2022 - Apr 2023 |
|
|
Post-Panamax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marina |
|
87,000 |
|
2006 |
|
Japan |
|
Spot19 |
|
$8,250 |
|
4.50% |
|
Feb 2023 - Apr 2023 |
|
E |
Xenia |
|
87,000 |
|
2006 |
|
Japan |
|
Spot19 |
|
$7,000 |
|
3.75% |
|
Feb
2023 - Mar 2023 |
|
E |
Sophia |
|
87,000 |
|
2007 |
|
Japan |
|
Spot19 |
|
$13,900 |
|
5.00% |
|
Jan 2023 - Mar 2023 |
|
E |
Eleni |
|
87,000 |
|
2008 |
|
Japan |
|
Spot19 |
|
$7,000 |
|
5.00% |
|
Jan
2023 - Mar 2023 |
|
E |
Martine |
|
87,000 |
|
2009 |
|
Japan |
|
Spot19 |
|
$27,000 |
|
5.00% |
|
Feb 2023 - Apr 2023 |
|
E |
Andreas K |
|
92,000 |
|
2009 |
|
South
Korea |
|
Spot19,34 |
|
$10,000 |
|
4.50% |
|
Mar
2023 - Apr 2023 |
|
F |
Panayiota K11 |
|
92,000 |
|
2010 |
|
South Korea |
|
Spot19,36 |
|
$12,000 |
|
5.00% |
|
Feb 2023 - Mar 2023 |
|
F |
Agios Spyridonas11 |
|
92,000 |
|
2010 |
|
South Korea |
|
Spot19 |
|
$29,000 |
|
5.00% |
|
Jan 2023 - Mar 2023 |
|
F |
Venus Heritage12 |
|
95,800 |
|
2010 |
|
Japan |
|
Spot19 |
|
$7,500 |
|
5.00% |
|
Jan
2023 - Mar 2023 |
|
G |
Venus History12 |
|
95,800 |
|
2011 |
|
Japan |
|
Spot19 |
|
$10,600 |
|
5.00% |
|
Feb 2023 - Mar 2023 |
|
G |
Venus Horizon |
|
95,800 |
|
2012 |
|
Japan |
|
Period19 |
|
$27,950 |
|
5.00% |
|
May
2022 - Mar 2023 |
|
G |
Venus Harmony |
|
95,700 |
|
2013 |
|
Japan |
|
Spot |
|
$7,900 |
|
5.00% |
|
Feb 2023 - Mar 2023 |
|
|
Troodos Sun17 |
|
85,000 |
|
2016 |
|
Japan |
|
Period19,20 |
|
BPI
82 5TC *
114% |
|
5.00% |
|
Jun
2021 - Apr 2023 |
|
J |
Troodos Air |
|
85,000 |
|
2016 |
|
Japan |
|
Period19 |
|
$28,000 |
|
5.00% |
|
May 2022 - Jun 2023 |
|
J |
Troodos Oak |
|
85,000 |
|
2020 |
|
Japan |
|
Period |
|
$15,500 |
|
3.75% |
|
Dec
2022 - Aug 2023 |
|
|
Climate Respect |
|
87,000 |
|
2022 |
|
Japan |
|
Period |
|
$18,500 |
|
5.00% |
|
Dec 2022 - Oct 2023 |
|
L |
Climate Ethics |
|
87,000 |
|
2023 |
|
Japan |
|
Period |
|
$18,500 |
|
5.00% |
|
Jan
2023 - Nov 2023 |
|
L |
Capesize |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mount
Troodos |
|
181,400 |
|
2009 |
|
Japan |
|
Period18 |
|
$34,500 |
|
3.75% |
|
Apr
2022 - Mar 2023 |
|
|
|
Period19,27 |
|
BCI 5TC * 106% |
|
3.75% |
|
Mar 2023 - Jan 2024 |
|
|
Kanaris |
|
178,100 |
|
2010 |
|
China |
|
Period6 |
|
$25,928 |
|
2.50% |
|
Sep 2011 – Sep 2031 |
|
|
Pelopidas |
|
176,000 |
|
2011 |
|
China |
|
Period19,26 |
|
$25,250 |
|
3.75% |
|
Jun
2022 - May2025 |
|
|
Aghia Sofia16 |
|
176,000 |
|
2012 |
|
China |
|
Spot25 |
|
BCI 5TC * 112% |
|
5.00% |
|
Dec 2022 - Mar 2023 |
|
|
|
Period33 |
|
BCI 5TC * 123% |
|
5.00% |
|
May 2023 - Apr 2024 |
|
|
Stelios
Y |
|
181,400 |
|
2012 |
|
Japan |
|
Period35 |
|
$24,400 |
|
3.75% |
|
Nov
2021 - Nov 2024 |
|
|
|
Period28 |
|
BCI 5TC * 117% |
|
3.75% |
|
Nov 2024 - Feb 2027 |
|
|
Lake Despina8 |
|
181,400 |
|
2014 |
|
Japan |
|
Period7 |
|
$25,200 |
|
5.00% |
|
Feb 2022 - Feb 2025 |
|
|
Maria |
|
181,300 |
|
2014 |
|
Japan |
|
Period19,29 |
|
BCI
5TC * 130% |
|
3.75% |
|
Jan
2024 - Jan 2024 |
|
|
Michalis H |
|
180,400 |
|
2012 |
|
China |
|
Period22 |
|
$23,000 |
|
3.75% |
|
Sep 2022 - Jul 2025 |
|
|
Subtotal |
|
4,455,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Newbuilds orderbook |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TBN |
|
87,000 |
|
Q2 2023 |
|
Japan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TBN |
|
82,000 |
|
Q4 2023 |
|
Japan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TBN |
|
82,000 |
|
Q4 2023 |
|
Japan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TBN |
|
82,000 |
|
Q1 2024 |
|
Japan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TBN |
|
82,000 |
|
Q1 2024 |
|
Japan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TBN |
|
82,000 |
|
Q4 2023 |
|
Japan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TBN |
|
82,500 |
|
Q3 2024 |
|
China |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TBN |
|
82,500 |
|
Q1 2025 |
|
China |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TBN |
|
82,000 |
|
Q2 2025 |
|
Japan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
744,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
5,199,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
For existing vessels, the year represents the year built. For our newbuild,
the date shown reflects the expected delivery dates. |
(2) |
Quoted charter rates are the recognized daily gross charter rates. For charter parties
with variable rates among periods or consecutive charter parties with the same
charterer, the recognized gross daily charter rate represents the weighted average gross daily charter rate over the duration
of the applicable charter period or series of charter periods, as applicable. In
the case of a charter agreement that provides for additional payments, namely ballast bonus to
compensate for vessel repositioning, the gross daily charter rate presented has been adjusted to reflect estimated vessel
repositioning expenses. Gross charter rates are inclusive of commissions. Net charter
rates are charter rates after the payment of commissions. In the case of voyage charters, the charter rate
represents revenue recognized on a pro rata basis over the duration of the voyage from load to discharge port less related
voyage expenses. |
(3) |
Commissions reflect payments made to third-party brokers or our charterers. |
(4) |
The start dates listed reflect either actual start dates or, in the case of contracted
charters that had not commenced as of February 24, 2023, the scheduled start dates.
Actual start dates and redelivery dates may differ from the referenced scheduled start and redelivery dates depending on the
terms of the charter and market conditions and does not reflect the options to
extend the period time charter. |
(5) |
Each vessel with the same letter is a “sister ship” of each other vessel that
has the same letter, and under certain of our charter contracts, may be substituted
with its “sister ships.” |
(6) |
Charterer of MV Kanaris agreed to reimburse us for part of the cost of the scrubbers and
BWTS installed on the vessel, which is recorded by increasing the recognized daily
charter rate by $634 over the remaining tenor of the time charter party. |
(7) |
A period time charter for a duration of 3 years at a gross daily charter rate of $22,500
plus an one-off $3.0 million payment upon charter commencement. The charter agreement
also grants the charterer an option to extend the period time charter for an additional year at a gross daily charter rate
of $27,500. |
(8) |
MV Lake Despina was sold and leased back in April 2021 on a bareboat charter basis for
a period of seven years with a purchase option in favor of the Company five years
and six months following the commencement of the bareboat charter period at a predetermined purchase price. |
(9) |
MV Vassos was sold and leased back in May 2022 on a bareboat charter basis for a period
of ten years with a purchase option in favor of the Company three years following
the commencement of the bareboat charter period and a purchase obligation at the end of the bareboat charter period, all at
predetermined purchase prices. |
(10) |
MV Kypros Sky and MV Kypros Spirit were sold and leased back in December 2019 on a bareboat
charter basis for a period of eight years, with purchase options in favor of the Company commencing three years following
the commencement of the bareboat charter period and a purchase obligation at the end of the bareboat charter period, all at
predetermined purchase prices. |
(11) |
MV Panayiota K and MV Agios Spyridonas were sold and leased back in January 2020 on a
bareboat charter basis for a period of six years, with purchase options in favor
of the Company commencing three years following the commencement of the bareboat charter period and a purchase obligation
at the end of the bareboat charter period, all at predetermined purchase prices.
In January 2023 the Company exercised the purchase options in both vessels and the ownership
of MV Panayiota K and MV Agios Spyridonas was transferred back to the Company. |
(12) |
MV Zoe, MV Kypros Land, MV Venus Heritage and MV Venus History were sold and leased back
in November 2019, on a bareboat charter basis, one for a period of eight years and three for a period of seven and a half
years, with a purchase option in favor of the Company five years and nine months following the commencement of the bareboat
charter period at a predetermined purchase price. |
(13) |
A period time charter of 5 years at a daily gross charter rate of $11,750 for the first
two years and a gross daily charter rate linked to the BPI-82 5TC times 97% minus $2,150, for the remaining period. |
(14) |
A period time charter of 5 years at a daily gross charter rate of $13,800 for the first
two years and a gross daily charter rate linked to the BPI-82 5TC times 97% minus $2,150, for the remaining period. |
(15) |
MV Pedhoulas Cedrus was sold and leased back in February 2021 on a bareboat charter basis
for a period of ten years with a purchase option in favor of the Company three years following the commencement of the bareboat
charter period and a purchase obligation at the end of the bareboat charter period, all at predetermined purchase prices. |
(16) |
MV Aghia Sofia was sold and leased back in September 2022 on a bareboat charter basis,
for a period of five years with purchase options in favor of the Company commencing three years following the commencement
of the bareboat charter period and a purchase obligation at the end of the bareboat charter period, all at predetermined purchase
prices. |
(17) |
MV Troodos Sun was sold and leased back in August 2021 on a bareboat charter basis for
a period of ten years, with purchase options in favor of the Company commencing three years following the commencement of
the bareboat charter period and a purchase obligation at the end of the bareboat charter period, all at predetermined purchase
prices. |
(18) |
Scrubber benefit was agreed on the basis of fuel consumption of heavy fuel oil and the
price differential between the HSFO and the VLSFO cost for the voyage and is included on the daily gross charter rate presented. |
(19) |
Scrubber benefit was agreed on the basis of fuel consumption of heavy fuel oil and the
price differential between the HSFO and the VLSFO cost for the voyage and is not included on the daily. |
(20) |
A period time charter of 22 to 26 months at a daily gross charter rate linked to the BPI-82
5TC times 114%. |
(21) |
A period time charter of 11 to 13 months at a daily gross charter rate of $10,950 plus
additional gross daily charter rate linked to the 50% of the BPI-74 4TC times 101%. |
(22) |
A period time charter for a minimum duration of three years at a gross daily charter rate
of $23,000. The charter agreement also grants the charterer an option to extend
the period time charter for an additional year at the same gross daily charter rate. |
(23) |
A period time charter of 10 to 13 months at a daily gross charter rate linked to the BPI-74
4TC times 104.25%. |
(24) |
A period time charter of 6 to 8 months at a daily gross charter rate of $10,500 plus additional
gross daily charter rate linked to the 50% of the BPI-82 5TC times 104%. |
(25) |
A spot time charter at a daily gross charter rate linked to the BCI
5TC times 112%. |
(26) |
A period time charter for a duration of three years at a gross daily charter rate of $25,250.
The charter agreement also grants the charterer an option to extend the period
time charter for an additional year at the same gross daily charter rate. |
(27) |
A period time charter for a duration of 11 to 14 months at a gross daily charter rate
linked to the BCI 5TC times 106%. |
(28) |
A period time charter for a duration of two and a half years at a gross daily charter
rate linked to the BCI 5TC times 117%. The charter agreement also grants the charterer
an option to extend the period time charter for an additional three years at a gross daily charter rate of $23,000. |
(29) |
A period time charter for a duration of 12 to 18 months at a gross daily charter rate
linked to the BCI 5TC times 130%. |
(30) |
A period time charter of 8 to 10 months at a daily gross charter rate linked to the BPI-74
4TC times 114%. |
(31) |
A period time charter of 7 to 10 months at a daily gross charter rate of $7,000 plus additional
gross daily charter rate linked to the 50% of the BPI-82 5TC. |
(32) |
A period time charter of 9 to 12 months at a daily gross charter rate linked to the BPI-82
5TC times 98%. |
(33) |
A period time charter for a duration of 11 to 14 months at a gross daily charter rate
linked to the BCI 5TC times 123%. |
(34) |
A spot time charter at a daily gross charter rate of $10,000 plus ballast bonus of $0.2
million upon charter commencement. |
(35) |
A period time charter for a duration of 3 years at a gross daily charter rate of $24,400.
The charter agreement also grants the charterer an option to extend the period
time charter for an additional year at a gross daily charter rate of $26,500. |
(36) |
A spot time charter at a daily gross charter rate of $12,000 plus ballast bonus of $0.4
million upon charter commencement. |
Chartering of Our Fleet
Our vessels are used to transport bulk cargoes, particularly coal, grain and iron ore,
along worldwide shipping routes. We may employ our vessels in time charters or in voyage charters.
A time charter is a contract to charter a vessel for a fixed period of time at a set
daily rate and can last from a few days up to several years, where the vessel performs one or more trips between load port(s)
and discharge port(s). Based on the duration of
vessel’s employment, a time charter can be either a long-term, or period, time
charter with duration of more than three months, or a short-term, or spot, time charter with duration of up to three months. Under
our time charters, the charterer pays for most voyage expenses, such as port, canal and fuel costs, agents’ fees, extra
war risks insurance and any other expenses related to the cargoes, and we pay for vessel operating expenses, which include, among
other costs, costs for crewing, provisions, stores, lubricants, insurance, maintenance and repairs, tonnage taxes, drydocking
and intermediate and special surveys.
Voyage charters are generally contracts to carry a specific cargo from a load port to
a discharge port, including positioning the vessel at the load port. Under a voyage charter, the charterer pays an agreed upon
total amount or on a per cargo ton basis, and we pay for both vessel operating expenses and voyage expenses. We infrequently enter
into voyage charters. Voyage charters together with spot time charters are referred to in our industry as employment in the spot
market.
We intend to employ our vessels on both period time charters and spot time charters,
according to our assessment of market conditions, with some of the world’s largest consumers of marine drybulk transportation
services. The vessels we deploy on period time charters provide us with relatively stable cash flow and high utilization rates,
while the vessels we deploy in the spot market allow us to maintain our flexibility in low charter market conditions. As of February 24,
2023, the average remaining duration of the charters for our existing fleet was 1.0 year. See, “Item 5. Operational
and Financial Review and Prospects D. Trend information.” for additional information.
Our Customers
Since 2005, our customers have included over 30 national, regional and international
companies, including Bunge, Cargill, Glencore, Daiichi, Intermare Transport G.m.b.H., Energy Eastern Pte. Ltd., NYK, NS United
Kaiun Kaisha, Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Oldendorff GmbH and Co. KG, Louis Dreyfus Armateurs, Louis Dreyfus Commodities, ArcelorMittal
or their affiliates. During 2022, two of our charterers, namely Viterra B.V (ex-Glencore Agriculture B.V.) and Cargill International
S.A., accounted for 33.52% of our revenues, with each one accounting for more than 10.0% of total revenues. During 2021, two of
our charterers, namely Viterra B.V. and Cargill International S.A., accounted for 30.70% of total revenues with each one accounting
for more than 10.0% of total revenues. During 2020, two of our charterers, namely Viterra B.V. and Cargill International S.A.,
accounted for 26.14% of total revenues. We seek to charter our vessels primarily to charterers who intend to use our vessels without
sub-chartering them to third parties. A prospective charterer’s financial condition and reliability are also important factors
in negotiating employment for our vessels.
Management of Our Fleet
In May 2008, we entered into a management agreement with Safety Management and in May
2015, we entered into a management agreement with Safe Bulkers Management, pursuant to which our Managers provided us with our
executive officers, technical, administrative, commercial and certain other services. Each of these management agreements expired
on May 28, 2018. In May 2018, we entered into new management agreements (the “Original Management Agreements”), pursuant
to which our Managers continue to provide us with technical, administrative, commercial and certain other services. Each of the
Original Management Agreements was effective as of May 29, 2018 and had an initial three-year term which could be extended on
a three-year basis on May 29, 2021 and May 29, 2024 upon mutual agreement with the Managers. On May 29, 2021, the Company and
the Managers agreed to extend the term of the Original Management Agreements until May 28, 2024. On April 1, 2022, we entered
into a new management agreement with the New Manager, and together with the Original Management Agreements, the “Management
Agreements”, with the initial term expiring on May 29, 2024, which can be extended for one additional term of three years.
Our arrangements with our Managers and their performance are reviewed by our board of directors. Our management team, collectively
referred to in this annual report as our “executive officers,” provide strategic management for our company and also
supervise the management of our day-to-day operations by our Managers. Our Managers report to us and our board of directors through
our executive officers. The Management Agreements with our Managers have a maximum expiration date in May 2027 and we expect
to enter into new agreements with the Managers upon their expiration. The terms of any such new agreements have not yet been determined.
Pursuant to the Management Agreements, in return for providing such services our Managers
receive a ship management fee of €875 per day per vessel and one of our Managers receives an annual ship management fee of
€3.50 million. For the three year period from May 29, 2018 to May 28, 2021 the annual ship management fee was €3.0 million.
Our Managers also receive a commission of 1.0% based on the contract price of any vessel sold by it on our behalf, and a commission
of 1.0% based on the contract price of any vessel bought by it on our behalf, including the acquisition of each of our contracted
newbuilds. We also pay our Managers a supervision fee of $550,000 per newbuild, of which 50% is payable upon the signing of the
relevant supervision agreement, and 50% upon successful completion of the sea trials of each newbuild, which we capitalize, for
the on-premises supervision by selected engineers and others on the Managers’ staff of newbuilds we have agreed to acquire
pursuant to shipbuilding contracts, memoranda of agreement, or otherwise.
Our Managers have agreed that, during the term of our Management Agreements and for a
period of one year following their termination, our Managers will not provide management services to, or with respect to, any
drybulk vessels other than (a) on our behalf or (b) with respect to drybulk vessels that are owned or operated by companies affiliated
with our chief executive officer or his family members, and drybulk vessels that are acquired, invested in or controlled by companies
affiliated with our chief executive officer or his family members, subject in each case to compliance with, or waivers of, the
restrictive covenant agreements entered into between us and such companies. Our Managers have also agreed that if one of our drybulk
vessels and a drybulk vessel owned or operated by any such company are both available and meet the criteria for a charter being
arranged by our Managers, our drybulk vessel will receive such charter.
The foregoing description of the Management Agreements does not purport to be complete
and is qualified in its entirety by ref-
erence to the Management Agreements, copies of which are attached as Exhibit 4.1 and
Exhibit 4.2 and incorporated herein by reference.
See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related
Party Transactions—Management Agreements” for more information.
Competition
We operate in highly competitive markets that are based primarily on supply and demand.
Our business fluctuates in line with the main patterns of trade of the major drybulk cargoes and varies according to changes in
the supply and demand for these items. We believe we differentiate ourselves from our competition by providing modern vessels
with advanced designs and technological specifications. As of February 24, 2023, our fleet had an average age of 10.5 years.
The majority of our fleet has been built in Japanese shipyards, which we believe provides us with an advantage in attracting large,
well-established customers, including Japanese customers.
The drybulk sector is characterized by relatively low barriers to entry, and ownership
of drybulk vessels is highly fragmented. In general, we compete with other owners of Panamax class or larger drybulk vessels for
charters based upon price, customer relationships, operating expertise, professional reputation and size, age, location and condition
of the vessel.
Crewing and Shore Employees
Our management team consists of our chief executive officer, president, chief financial
officer and assistant chief financial officer, chief operating officer, chief financial controller and assistant chief financial
controller, chief compliance officer and our internal auditor. Our Managers are responsible for the technical management of our
fleet and therefore also handle the recruiting, either directly or through crewing agents, of the senior officers and all other
crew members for our vessels. As of December 31, 2022, approximately 914 people served on board the vessels in our fleet, and
our Managers employed approximately 156 people on shore.
Permits and Authorizations
We are required by various governmental and other agencies to obtain certain permits,
licenses, certificates and financial assurances with respect to each of our vessels. The kinds of permits, licenses, certificates
and financial assurances required by governmental and other agencies depend upon several factors, including the commodity being
transported, the waters in which the vessel operates, the nationality of the vessel’s crew and the type and age of the vessel.
All permits, licenses, certificates and financial assurances currently required to operate our vessels have been obtained. Additional
laws and regulations, environmental or otherwise, may be adopted which could limit our ability to do business or increase the
cost of doing business.
Risk of Loss and Liability Insurance |
|
General
The operation of our fleet involves risks such as mechanical failure, collision, property
loss, cargo loss or damage as well as personal injury, illness and loss of life. In addition, the operation of any oceangoing
vessel is subject to the inherent possibility of marine disaster, including oil spills and other environmental mishaps, the risk
of piracy and the liabilities arising from owning and operating vessels in international trade. The U.S. Oil Pollution Act of
1990 (“OPA 90”), which imposes virtually unlimited liability upon owners, operators and demise charterers of vessels
trading in the United States exclusive economic zone for certain oil pollution accidents in the United States, has made liability
insurance more expensive for vessel owners and operators trading in the United States market.
Our Managers are responsible for arranging insurance for all our vessels on the terms
specified in our Management Agreements, which we believe are in line with standard industry practice. In accordance with our Management
Agreements, our Managers procure and maintain hull and machinery insurance, war risks insurance, freight, demurrage and defense
coverage and protection and indemnity coverage with mutual assurance associations. Due to our low incident rate and the relatively
young age of our fleet, we are generally able to procure relatively low rates for all types of insurance.
While our insurance coverage for our drybulk vessel fleet is in amounts that we believe
to be prudent to protect us against normal risks involved in the conduct of our business and consistent with standard industry
practice, our Managers may not be able to maintain this level of coverage throughout a vessel’s useful life. Furthermore,
all risks may not be adequately insured against, any particular claim may not be paid and adequate insurance coverage may not
always be obtainable at reasonable rates.
Hull and machinery insurance
Our marine hull and machinery insurance covers risks of partial loss or actual or constructive
total loss from collision, fire, grounding, engine breakdown and other insured risks up to an agreed amount per vessel. Our vessels
will each be covered up to at least their fair market value after meeting certain deductibles per incident per vessel. We also
maintain increased value coverage for each of our vessels. Under this increased value coverage, in the event of the total loss
of a vessel, we are entitled to recover amounts in excess of the total loss amount recoverable under our hull and machinery policy.
Protection and indemnity insurance
Protection and indemnity insurance is a form of mutual indemnity insurance provided by
mutual marine protection and indemnity associations (“P&I Associations”) formed by vessel owners to provide protection
from large financial loss to one club member by contribution towards that loss by all members.
Protection and indemnity insurance covers our third-party liabilities in connection with
our shipping activities. This includes third-party liability and other related expenses of injury or death of crew members, passengers
and other third parties, loss or
damage to cargo, claims arising from collisions with other vessels, damage to other third
party property, pollution arising from oil or other substances and salvage, towing and other related costs, including wreck removal.
Our coverage, except for pollution, will be unlimited. Furthermore, within this aggregate limit, club coverage is also limited
to the amount of the member’s legal liability.
Our protection and indemnity insurance coverage for pollution is limited to $1.0 billion
per vessel per incident. Our protection and indemnity insurance coverage in respect of passengers is limited to $2.0 billion and
in respect of passengers and seamen is limited to $3.0 billion per vessel per incident. The 13 P&I Associations that comprise
the International Group of P&I Clubs (the “International Group”) insure approximately 90.0% of the world’s
commercial blue-water tonnage and have entered into a pooling agreement to reinsure each P&I Association’s liabilities.
As a member of a P&I Association that is a member of the International Group, we are subject to calls payable to the P&I
Association based on the International Group’s claim records, as well as the claim records of all other members of the individual
associations.
Although the P&I Associations compete with each other for business, they have found
it beneficial to mutualize their larger risks among themselves through the International Group. This is known as the “Pool.”
This pooling is regulated by a contractual agreement which defines the risks that are to be covered and how claims falling on
the Pool are to be shared among the participants in the International Group. The Pool provides a mechanism for sharing all claims
in excess of $10.0 million up to, currently, approximately $8.9 billion. On that basis, all claims up to $10.0 million will be
covered by each Club’s Individual Retention and all claims in excess of $10.0 million up to $100.0 million will be covered
by the Pool. The Pool is structured in three layers from $10 million to $100 million. For amounts in excess of $30 million, the
Pool is reinsured by the Group captive reinsurance vehicle, Hydra Insurance Company Limited (“Hydra”). Hydra is a
Bermuda incorporated Segregated Accounts company in which each of the 13 Group Clubs has its own segregated account (or “cell”)
ring fencing its assets and liabilities from those of the company or any of the other Club cells. Hydra reinsures each Club in
respect of that Club’s liabilities within the Pool and reinsurance layers in which it participates. Through the participation
of Hydra, the Group Clubs can retain, within their Hydra cells, premium which would otherwise have been paid to the commercial
reinsurance markets.
For the 2022/2023 policy year, the International Group maintained a three layer GXL reinsurance
program, together with an additional Collective Overspill layer, which combine to provide commercial reinsurance cover of up to
$3.1 billion per vessel per incident, comprising of reinsurance for all claims of up to $2.1 billion per vessel per incident in
excess of the $100.0 million insured by the Pool and an additional $1.0 billion in excess of the aforesaid $2.1 billion per vessel
per incident in respect of claims for overspill.
War Risks Insurance
Our war risk insurance covers hull or freight damage, detention or diversions risks and
P&I liabilities (including crew) arising out of confiscations, seizure, capture, vandalism, sabotage and/or other war risks
and is subject to separate limits of:
(i) each vessel’s hull and machinery value and each vessel’s corresponding
increased value, and
(ii) for war risks P&I liabilities including crew up to $500.0 million per vessel
per incident.
Inspection by Classification Societies
Every oceangoing vessel must be “classed” by a classification society. The
classification society certifies that the vessel is “in class,” signifying that the vessel has been built and maintained
in accordance with the rules and regulations of the classification society. In addition, each vessel must comply with all applicable
laws, rules and regulations of the vessel’s country of registry, or “flag state,” as well as the international
conventions of which that flag state is a member. A vessel’s compliance with international conventions and corresponding
laws and ordinances of its flag state can be confirmed by the applicable flag state, port state control or, upon application or
by official order, the classification society, acting on behalf of the authorities concerned.
The classification society also undertakes, upon request, other surveys and checks that
are required by regulations and requirements of the flag state. These surveys are subject to agreements made in each individual
case or to the regulations of the country concerned.
All areas subject to survey as defined by the classification society are required to
be surveyed at least once per class period, unless shorter intervals between surveys are prescribed elsewhere. The period between
two subsequent surveys of each area must not exceed five years. The maintenance of class, regular and extraordinary surveys of
a vessel’s hull and machinery, including the electrical plant, and any special equipment classed are required to be performed
as follows:
|
~ |
Annual Surveys. For oceangoing vessels, annual
surveys are conducted for their hulls and machinery, including the electrical plants, and for any special equipment classed,
at intervals of 12 months from the date of commencement of the class period indicated in the certificate. |
|
~ |
Intermediate Surveys. Extended annual surveys are referred
to as “intermediate surveys” and typically are conducted on the occasion of the second or third annual survey
after commissioning and after each class renewal. |
|
~ |
Class Renewal / Special Surveys. Class renewal surveys, also
known as “special surveys,” are more extensive than intermediate surveys and are carried out at the end of each
five-year period. During the special survey the vessel is thoroughly examined, including thickness-gauging to determine any
diminution in the steel structures. Should the thickness be found to be less than class requirements, the classification society
would prescribe steel renewals. It may be expensive to have steel renewals pass a special survey if the vessel is aged or
experiences excessive wear and tear. A vessel owner has the option of arranging with the classification society for the vessel’s
machinery to be on a continuous survey cycle, according to which all machinery would be surveyed within a five-year cycle.
At an owner’s application, the surveys required for class renewal may be split according to an agreed schedule to extend
over the entire period of class. |
Vessels are drydocked during intermediate and special surveys for repairs of their underwater
parts. Intermediate surveys may
not be required for vessels under the age of 15 years. If “in water survey”
notation is assigned by class, as is the case for our vessels, the vessel owner has the option of carrying out an underwater inspection
of the vessel in lieu of drydocking, subject to certain conditions. In the event that an “in water survey” notation
is assigned as part of a particular intermediate survey, dry-docking would be required for the following special survey thereby
generally achieving a higher utilization for the relevant vessel. Drydocking can be undertaken as part of a special survey if
the drydocking occurs within 15 months prior to the special survey due date. Special survey may be extended under certain provisions
for a period of up to three months from their due date. BWTS and Scrubber installations and vessels’ upgrades are usually
undertaken concurrently with the scheduled drydocking. A detailed schedule of expected drydockings and special surveys for the
next three years is provided in the following table:
Vessel Name |
Drydocking |
Scheduled Survey (1) |
Maria (2) (3) (4) |
January 2023 |
January 2024 |
Michalis H (2) (3) |
February 2023 |
January 2027 |
Marina (3) |
March 2023 |
January 2026 |
Maritsa (3) |
March 2023 |
January 2025 |
Koulitsa 2 (3) |
March 2023 |
March 2023 |
Kanaris (3) |
April 2023 |
March 2025 |
Aghia Sofia (2) (3) |
May 2023 |
January 2024 |
Lake Despina (2) (3) |
June 2023 |
January 2024 |
Pedhoulas Commander (3) |
June 2023 |
May 2023 |
Pedhoulas Cedrus (3) |
June 2023 |
June 2023 |
Andreas K (3) |
June 2023 |
August 2024 |
Zoe (3) |
July 2023 |
July 2023 |
Venus Harmony (3) |
August 2023 |
November 2023 |
Xenia (3) |
September 2023 |
April 2026 |
Eleni (3) |
November 2023 |
November 2023 |
Kypros Bravery |
January 2024 |
January 2025 |
Kypros Land |
January 2024 |
January 2024 |
Kypros Sea |
January 2024 |
March 2024 |
Agios Spyridonas (3) |
January 2024 |
January 2025 |
Martine (3) |
February 2024 |
February 2024 |
Kypros Sky |
March 2024 |
March 2025 |
Stelios Y (2) (3) |
March 2024 |
March 2025 |
Mount Troodos (3) |
April 2024 |
November 2024 |
Troodos Oak |
April 2024 |
April 2025 |
Panayiota K (3) |
April 2024 |
April 2025 |
Katerina (3) |
May 2024 |
May 2024 |
Pedhoulas Merchant (3) |
May 2024 |
March 2026 |
Kypros Loyalty |
July 2024 |
June 2025 |
Pedhoulas Cherry (3) |
July 2024 |
July 2025 |
Venus Heritage (3) |
October 2024 |
December 2025 |
Pedhoulas Leader (3) |
November 2024 |
February 2027 |
Troodos Air |
March 2025 |
March 2026 |
Pedhoulas Rose |
April 2025 |
January 2027 |
Paraskevi 2 |
April 2025 |
April 2026 |
Troodos Sun |
April 2025 |
January 2026 |
Pelopidas |
June 2025 |
November 2026 |
Kypros Spirit |
July 2025 |
July 2026 |
Venus History |
September 2025 |
September 2026 |
Sophia |
December 2025 |
June 2027 |
Vessel Name |
Drydocking |
Scheduled Survey (1) |
(1) |
Intermediate, Docking or Special survey date. |
(2) |
Scrubber retrofit. |
(3) |
Environmental upgrades. |
(4) |
BWTS. |
Failure to timely complete repairs, surveys, or dry-dockings may affect our results of
operations.
Following a survey, if any defects are found, the classification surveyor will issue
a “recommendation or condition of class” which must be rectified by the vessel owner within the prescribed time limits.
In general, insurance underwriters make it a condition for insurance coverage that a
vessel be certified as “in class” by a classification society which is a member of the International Association of
Classification Societies (“IACS”). All of our vessels are certified as being “in class” by either Lloyd’s
Register of Shipping, the American Bureau of Shipping or Bureau Veritas, each of which is a member of IACS.
Regulations: Safety and the Environment |
|
General
Our vessels are subject to international conventions and national, state and local laws
and regulations in force in international waters and the countries in which they operate or are registered, including environmental
protection requirements governing the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, the cleanup of oil spills and
the management of other contamination, air emissions, water discharges and ballast water.
These laws and regulations include regulations imposed by the IMO, the United Nations
agency for maritime safety and the prevention of pollution by ships, such as the International Convention for Prevention of Pollution
from Ships (“MARPOL”), the International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea (“SOLAS”), International
Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments (“BWM Convention”) and in general
implementing all related regulations adopted by the IMO, the E.U. and other international, national and local regulatory bodies
in the jurisdictions where our vessels travel and in the ports where our vessels call. In the U.S., the requirements include OPA
90, the U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), the U.S. Clean Water
Act (“CWA”) and U.S. Clean Air Act (“CAA”). Compliance with these environmental protection requirements
has imposed significant cost and expense, including the cost of vessel modifications and implementation of certain operating procedures.
Our fleet complies with all current requirements. However, we incurred significant vessel
modification expenditures in 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022 mainly in BWTS and Scrubbers and we anticipate to incur additional expenditures
in the current or subsequent fiscal years to comply with certain requirements, including mainly the installation of four additional
Scrubbers. In parallel, the Company is continuing a vessel environmental upgrade program, in relation to existing and forthcoming
GHG emission regulations, which involves application of low friction paints and installation of energy saving devices, scheduling
to having upgraded 20 existing vessels by the end of 2023.
Under our Management Agreements, our Managers have assumed technical management responsibility
for our fleet, including compliance with all applicable government and other regulations. If the Management Agreements with our
Managers terminate, we would attempt to hire another party to assume this responsibility. In the event of termination, we might
be unable to hire another party to perform these and other services for the present fee structure and related costs. However,
due to the nature of our relationship with our Managers, we do not expect our Management Agreements to be terminated early.
A variety of governmental and private entities subject our vessels to both scheduled
and unscheduled inspections. These entities include the local port authorities (such as the U.S. Coast Guard, harbor master or
equivalent), classification societies, flag state administration (country of registry), charterers and terminal operators. Certain
of these entities require us to obtain permits, licenses, financial assurances and certificates for the operation of our vessels.
Failure to maintain necessary permits or approvals or identification of deficiencies during inspections could require us to incur
substantial costs or result in the temporary suspension of the operation of one or more of our vessels.
We believe that the heightened level of environmental and quality concerns among insurance
underwriters, regulators and charterers is leading to greater inspection and safety requirements on all vessels and may accelerate
the scrapping of older vessels throughout the drybulk shipping industry. Increasing environmental concerns have created a demand
for vessels that conform to the stricter environmental standards. We are required to maintain operating standards for all of our
vessels that emphasize efficiency, operational safety, quality maintenance, reduced environmental footprint, continuous training
of our officers and crews and compliance with U.S. and international regulations. Our Managers and our vessels are certified in
accordance with ISO 14001 and ISO 50001 relating to environmental standards and energy efficiency. Moreover we have obtained additional
class notation for most of our fleet for the prevention of sea and air pollution while we are in the process of obtaining such
class notation for the remaining vessels. We believe that the operation of our vessels is in substantial compliance with all environmental
laws and regulations applicable to us as of the date of this annual report. However, because such laws and regulations are subject
to frequent change and may impose increasingly stricter requirements, such future requirements could limit our ability to do business,
increase our operating costs, force the early retirement of our vessels and/or affect their resale value, all of which could have
a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Regulations by IMO and Other Related Bodies
Regulations issued by IMO and other related bodies may affect our operations, impose
restrictions on our vessels, or require additional investments. For example MARPOL convention of IMO regulates marine pollution,
emissions and discharges.
IMO and other jurisdictions have regulated or are considering the further regulation
of GHG emissions from vessels and emissions of nitrogen oxides. Additional conventions, laws and regulations may be adopted which
could limit our ability to do business or increase the cost of our doing business and which may materially adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations. Because such conventions, laws and regulations are often revised, or
the required additional measures for compliance are still under development, we cannot predict the ultimate cost of complying
with such conventions, laws and regulations or the impact thereof on the resale prices or useful lives of our vessels. We are
also required by various governmental and quasi-governmental agencies to obtain certain permits, licenses, certificates and financial
assurances with respect to our operations.
These requirements can also affect the resale prices or useful lives of our vessels or
require reductions in cargo capacity, ship modifications or operational changes or restrictions. Failure to comply with these
requirements could lead to decreased availability of, or more costly insurance coverage for environmental matters or result in
the denial of access to certain jurisdictional waters or ports, or detention in certain ports. Under local, national and foreign
laws, as well as international treaties and conventions, we could incur material liabilities, including cleanup obligations and
claims for natural resource, personal injury and property damages in the event that there is a release of petroleum or other hazardous
materials from our vessels or otherwise in connection with our operations. Violations of, or liabilities under, environmental
regulations can result in substantial penalties, fines and other sanctions, including, in certain instances, seizure or detention
of our vessels. In addition, we are subject to the risk that we, our affiliated entities, or our or their respective officers,
directors, shore employees, crew on board and agents may take actions determined to be in violation of such environmental regulations
and laws and our environmental policies. Any such actual or alleged environmental laws regulations and policies violation, under
negligence, willful misconduct or fault, could result in substantial fines, civil and/or criminal penalties or curtailment of
operations in certain jurisdictions, and might adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. In
addition, actual or alleged violations could damage our reputation and ability to do business. Furthermore, detecting, investigating
and resolving actual or alleged violations is expensive and can consume significant time and attention of our senior management.
Events of this nature would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Such regulations are presented in the following paragraphs:
Nitrogen and Sulfur Oxide Emission Regulations: In 1997, the IMO adopted Annex
VI to MARPOL to address air pollution from vessels. Annex VI became effective in 2005, and sets limits on sulfur oxide and nitrogen
oxide emissions from vessel exhausts and prohibits deliberate emissions of ozone depleting substances, such as chlorofluorocarbons.
Annex VI also includes a global cap on the sulfur content of marine fuels and allows for the establishment of Emission Control
Areas (“ECAs”) with more stringent controls on sulfur emissions. Presently, designated ECAs include specified areas
of North America, the Caribbean, the North Sea and the Baltic Sea. The Mediterranean Sea has been proposed as an additional ECA.
In 2008, the IMO Marine Environment Protection Committee (“MEPC”) adopted amendments to Annex VI regarding particulate
matter, nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxide emissions. These amendments, which entered into force in 2010, are designed to reduce
air pollution from vessels by, among other things, (i) establishing new tiers of stringent nitrogen oxide emissions standards
for new marine engines, depending on their date of installation and (ii) implementing a progressive reduction of sulfur oxide
emissions from ships:
(i) Control of Nitrogen Oxides
Nitrogen oxides emission regulations require the installation of advanced Tier III engines
in newbuilds and modifications are not expected to be required in existing vessels.
(ii) Control of Sulfur Oxides
A global 0.5% sulfur cap on marine fuels came into force on January 1, 2020, as
agreed in amendments adopted in 2008 for Annex VI to MARPOL reducing the previous sulfur cap of 3.5%. Vessels may use either VLSFO
or HSFO if they are equipped with Scrubbers. The viability of Scrubber investments mainly depends on the price differential between
VLSFO which usually are more expensive and HSFO. The use of VLSFO has raised concerns in relation to excess wear of piston liners
and fuel pumps. On the other hand shortage of HSFO in certain ports has been experienced as only a small percentage of the global
fleet is equipped with Scrubbers and the trading of HSFO may not be economical to fuel suppliers. Furthermore, restrictions of
effluents from Scrubbers have been or are considered to be imposed in various jurisdictions, mainly in ports, which may affect
the viability of such investments.
In response to sulfur oxides emissions regulations, we have installed Scrubbers in 19
of our vessels and we expect to install four additional Scrubbers, three during 2023 and one in 2024. In all vessels the Company
had introduced critical spares inventory on board in order to secure smooth operation and compliance with existing regulations.
If the price differential between VLSFO and HSFO is narrower than expected due to among other things, a drop in oil prices and/or
a reduced demand for oil, then we may not realize any return, or we may realize a lower return on our investment in Scrubbers
than that which we expected, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows and financial
position. Conversely, if the price differential between VLSFO and HSFO is wider than expected, about half of our vessels that
will not be equipped with Scrubbers may face difficulties in competing with vessels equipped with Scrubbers, which could have
a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows and financial position.
Reduced limits of sulfur content of fuel oil for ECA passage are implemented, resulting
to the use of lighter fuels, namely low sulfur marine gas oil with a maximum sulfur content of 0.1% (“LSMGO”). Additional
or new requirements, conventions, laws or regulations, including the adoption of additional ECAs, or other new or more stringent
emissions requirements adopted by the IMO,
the E.U., the U.S. or individual states, or other jurisdictions in which we operate,
could require vessel modifications or otherwise increase the costs of our operations. All our non Scrubber-fitted vessels may
use LSMGO for ECA passage and the Scrubber-fitted vessels, which use HSFO are designed to reduce the sulfur emissions of HSFO
to levels substantially below the corresponding limit of 0.1% sulfur content suitable for ECA passage. Such vessels of our fleet
have an additional commercial advantage on the basis of further increased price differential of LSMGO versus HSFO compared to
price differential of VLSFO versus HSFO and a further environmental advantage due to their reduced SOx emissions as their Scrubbers
operate below 0.1% sulfur content limit at all times when in use.
MEPC 79 adopted amendments to designate the Mediterranean Sea, as a whole, as an ECA
for Sulfur Oxides and particulate matter, under MARPOL Annex VI. The amendment is expected to enter into force on 1 May 2024,
with the new limit taking effect on 1 May 2025.
Examples of additional requirements imposed locally from time to time are: (i) the Domestic
Emission Control Areas (“DECAs”) introduced by China, in 2015, which have designated the Pearl River Delta, the Yangtze
River Delta and the Bohai-Rim Area (Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei) as areas where vessels navigating, berthing and operating are
required to use VLSFO. As of January 1, 2019, China expanded the scope of the DECAs to include all coastal waters within 12 nautical
miles of the mainland, and (ii) US Vessel General Permit (the “VGP”) areas. Our Scrubber-fitted vessels do not
operate the Scrubbers while in such areas, due to certain additional restrictions, and instead are using LSMGO.
Greenhouse Gas Regulation – United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change:
In February 2005, the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change entered into force.
Pursuant to the Kyoto Protocol, adopting countries are required to implement national programs to reduce emissions of certain
gases, generally referred to as greenhouse gases, which are suspected of contributing to global warming. Currently, the emissions
of greenhouse gases from international shipping are not subject to the Kyoto Protocol. The Paris Agreement adopted under the United
Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in December 2015 contemplates commitments from each nation party thereto to
take action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and limit increases in global temperatures but did not include any restrictions
or other measures specific to shipping emissions. In January 2021, the U.S. President announced that the United States intended
to rejoin the Paris Agreement. A new treaty may be adopted in the future that includes restrictions on shipping emissions. International
and multinational bodies or individual countries also may adopt their own climate change regulatory initiatives.
The IMO recently announced its intention to develop reduction measures for greenhouse
gases from international shipping. The E.U. enacted a regulation requiring ships over 5,000 gross tons docking in E.U. ports to
monitor, report and verify greenhouse gas emissions which went into effect in 2018. The United States or individual U.S. states
could also enact environmental regulations that could affect our operations. These or other developments may result in regulations
relating to the control of greenhouse gas emissions. Any passage of climate control legislation or other regulatory initiatives
in the jurisdictions where we operate could result in financial impacts on our operations that we cannot predict with certainty
at this time. Even in the absence of climate control legislation, our business may be indirectly affected to the extent that climate
change may result in sea level changes or more intense weather events.
The European Parliament and the Council of the E.U. have adopted regulation 2015/757,
the EU-MRV on the monitoring, reporting and verification of CO2 emissions from maritime transport. It entered into force on July 1,
2015 and monitoring began January 1, 2018. The maritime EU-MRV regulation applies to all merchant ships of 5,000 gross tons
or above on voyages from, to and between ports under jurisdiction of E.U. member states. Companies operating the vessels will
have to monitor the CO2 emissions released while in port and for any voyages to or from a port under the jurisdiction of an E.U.
member state and to keep records on CO2 emissions on both per-voyage and annual bases. Furthermore, as of January 1, 2018,
our vessels began monitoring and reporting CO2 emissions pursuant to the IMO DCS regulation, which is part of the IMO’s
efforts to reduce GHG emissions from ships by 50% by 2050 compared to 2008. On February 4, 2019, the European Commission tabled
a proposal concerning the amendment of the EU-MRV. The main objective of the proposal was to amend the EU-MRV in order to take
account of the new IMO DCS for fuel oil consumption of ships that was introduced by the IMO in March 2018. As part of the IMO’s
efforts to reduce GHG emissions from ships, an initial IMO GHG strategy envisaged a reduction in carbon intensity of international
shipping (a 40% reduction of average CO2 emissions per transport work by 2030 and a 70% reduction by 2050, compared to 2008) and
a 50% reduction in total annual GHG emissions from international shipping by 2050, compared to 2008. The globally applicable IMO
DCS system, currently runs in parallel with the EU-MRV, thus duplicating regulation for shipping companies whose ships sail both
inside and outside the EU. The EU recently included international carbon emissions from the maritime sector in the EU Emissions
Trading System (“EU ETS”). These monitoring and reporting processes adopted by the EU-MRV and the IMO DCS regulations
is considered to be part of a market-based mechanism for a carbon tax to be adopted.
On June 22, 2022, the European Union revised proposed amendments to regulation 2015/757.
There is some disagreement between the European Council and Commission on the one hand and the European Parliament on the other
one how soon the measures should be enacted for intra-EU and international shipments, as well as with respect to whether there
should be certain carve-outs for member states heavily dependent on shipping and for insular or coastal regions. Nevertheless,
and regardless of these particulars, the proposed amendments would effectively impose an EU ETS on Marine Shipping going through
ports or routes under the E.U.’s regulatory jurisdiction. If adopted, these amendments would impose an additional regulatory
burden on us to ensure that our vessels meet the requirements of the revised EU-MRV, as well as potential additional costs related
to the ETS.
The MEPC has adopted the EEDI for newbuild vessels, which requires a minimum energy efficiency
level per capacity mile (e.g. tonne mile) for different vessel type and size segments, mandating an up to 30% improvement in design
performance depending on vessel type and size. The EEDI provides a specific figure for an individual vessel design, expressed
in grams of CO2 per ship’s capacity-mile (the smaller the EEDI the more energy efficient vessel design) and is calculated
by a formula based on the technical
design parameters for a given ship. Since 1 January 2013, following an initial two year
EEDI Phase 0, new vessel design need to meet the reference level for their vessel type. The CO2 reduction level (grams of CO2
per tonne mile) for Phase 1 was set to 10% and will be tightened every five years (20% for Phase 2 and 30% for Phase 3) to keep
pace with technological developments of new efficiency and reduction measures. Reduction rates have been established until the
period 2025 and onwards (Phase 3) when a 30% reduction is mandated for applicable ship types calculated from a reference line
representing the average efficiency for ships built between 2000 and 2010. Furthermore, research is conducted to identify and
develop alternative fuels (e.g. ammonia, hydrogen, methanol, biofuels) to replace fossil fuels in future newbuild designs that
will be able to meet the more stringent GHG regulations 2030 onwards, including as interim solution propulsion by dual fuel engines
using liquified natural gas with HSFO or VLSFO.
Like the EEDI, the ‘Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index’ (“EEXI”)
is a technical or ‘design’ efficiency index which requires a vessel to achieve a required level of technical efficiency
(Required EEXI) under specified reference conditions. Compliance is determined by the vessel’s design and arrangements.
This means an attained EEXI can only be changed through alterations to the vessel’s design or machinery and not day to day
operational action such as speed reduction or reduced cargo. In its simplest form, the attained EEXI is the vessel’s grams
of CO2 emitted per capacity tonne mile under the ship specific reference conditions. This is a function of the installed engine
power (kW), the specific fuel consumption of the main and auxiliary engines and a carbon factor representing the conversion of
fuel to CO2, vessel capacity and vessel reference speed. The Required EEXI is the vessel’s required maximum grams of CO2
emitted by the vessel per capacity dwt tonne mile under reference conditions, given its type and capacity. To comply with the
regulation, the attained EEXI for a vessel must be less than or equal to the Required EEXI.
The EEDI phases for newbuild vessels and its retroactive application of the EEDI to all
existing and in service cargo above a certain size, known as the EEXI, sets new technical efficiency standard for existing ships.
This will impose a requirement equivalent to EEDI Phase 2 or 3 (with some adjustments) to all existing ships regardless of year
of build and is intended an a one-off certification. This regulation entered into force on 1 January 2023. Demonstration of compliance
is required by the vessel’s first survey for the issue or endorsement of the International Air Pollution Prevention Certification,
following entry into force. In addition to the upcoming EEDI Phase 3, a possible Phase 4 can be introduced later this decade,
further tightening requirements for newbuilds.
Furthermore, a mandatory Carbon Intensity Indicator (“CII”) – e.g.
Annual Efficiency Ratio – grams of CO2 per dwt-mile, and rating scheme was introduced on January 1, 2023, where all cargo
vessels above 5,000 GT are given a rating of A to E every year. The rating thresholds will become increasingly stringent towards
2030. For ships that achieve a D rating for three consecutive years or an E rating, a corrective action plan needs to be developed
as part of the Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (“SEEMP”) and approved. Technical specifications regarding baselines,
methods of calculations and ship-specific requirements were established through guidelines to be finalized and approved at MEPC.
The USCG plans to develop and propose regulations to implement these provisions in the United States.
In addition, the SEEMP will be strengthened (Enhanced SEEMP) to include mandatory content,
such as an implementation plan on how to achieve the CII targets, and making it subject to approval. These new requirements for
existing ships will be reviewed by the end of 2025, with particular focus on the enforcement of the carbon intensity rating requirements.
GHG reduction measures adopted, or further additional measures to be adopted by the IMO,
EU and other jurisdictions for reaching 2030 goals may impose operational and financial restrictions, carbon tax or an emission
trading system on less efficient vessels starting from 2023, gradually affecting younger vessels, even newbuilds after 2030, reducing
their trade and competitiveness, increasing their environmental compliance costs, imposing additional energy efficiency investments,
or even making such vessels obsolete. This or other developments may result in financial impacts on our operations that we cannot
predict with certainty at this time, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
The IMO received numerous submissions related to its ongoing revision of the Initial
IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships (MEPC.304(72)). Member States extensively discussed the revision of ambition
levels of the Initial Strategy towards decarbonization of shipping. The 2030 and 2050 revised targets are still being discussed,
along with additional intermediate checkpoint leading up to 2050. The revision of the Initial Strategy will continue to be discussed
in the Intersessional Working Group on GHG Reduction (ISWG-GHG 14 in March 2023), and a Revised Strategy is expected to be adopted
at MEPC 80 (July 2023).
In response to the above GHG environmental regulations we monitor CO2 vessel emissions
pursuant to the IMO DCS and EU-MRV, assessing in parallel the applicability of relevant energy efficiency measures. Furthermore,
we pursue a fleet renewal strategy having sold eight of our older or Chinese built less efficient vessels the last two years,
and placed orders for the acquisition of 12 dry-bulk newbuild vessels with EEDI complying with IMO Phase 3 requirements, three
of which have already been delivered to us, and implementing environmental upgrades in the existing fleet.
The European Parliament and Council have come to an agreement on the revision of the
EU ETS, Directive 2003/87/EC, introducing the extension to maritime transport by 1 January 2024. The EU ETS is a cornerstone of
the EU’s policy to combat climate change and its key tool for reducing greenhouse gas emissions cost-effectively. On 14
July 2021, the European Commission adopted a series of legislative proposals setting out how it intends to achieve climate neutrality
in the EU by 2050, including the intermediate target of an at least 55% net reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030. The
package proposes to revise several pieces of EU climate legislation, including the EU ETS.
The overall volume of greenhouse gases that can be emitted by industry sectors covered
by the EU ETS is limited by a ‘cap’ on the number of emission allowances. Within the cap, companies receive or buy
emission allowances, which they can trade as needed. The cap decreases every year, ensuring that total emissions fall. Each allowance
gives the holder the right to emit:
|
~ |
one tonne of carbon dioxide (CO2), or |
|
~ |
the equivalent amount of other powerful greenhouse
gases, nitrous oxide (N2O) and perfluorocarbons (PFCs). |
In phase 3 of the EU ETS (2013-2020), the European Union-wide cap for stationary installations
decreased each year by a linear reduction factor of 1.74%. The 2013 cap was set on the basis of the average total quantity of
allowances issued annually in 2008-2012. In phase 4 of the EU ETS (2021-2030), the cap on emissions continues to decrease annually
at an increased annual linear reduction factor of 2.2%.
International credits are financial instruments that represent a tonne of CO2 removed
or reduced from the atmosphere as a result of an emissions reduction project. The annual procedure of monitoring, reporting and
verification (MRV), together with all the associated processes, is known as the ETS compliance cycle. Operators covered by the
EU ETS are required to have an approved monitoring plan for monitoring and reporting annual emissions. Every year, operators must
submit an emissions report. The data for a given year must be verified by an accredited verifier by March 31 of the following
year. Once verified, operators must surrender the equivalent number of allowances by 30 April of that year. This or other developments
may result in financial impacts on our operations that we cannot predict with certainty at this time, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Ballast Water Treatment System: In 2004 the IMO adopted the BWM Convention, implementing
regulations calling for a phased introduction of mandatory ballast water exchange requirements, to be replaced in time with mandatory
concentration limits. The BWM Convention took effect in September 2017. Many of the implementation dates in the BWM Convention
had already passed prior to its effectiveness, so that the period of installation of mandatory ballast water exchange requirements
would be extremely short, with several thousand ships a year needing to install BWTS. For this reason, on December 4, 2013, the
IMO Assembly passed a resolution revising the application dates of the BWM Convention so that they are triggered by the entry
into force date and not the dates originally in the BWM Convention. This, in effect, makes all vessels constructed before September
8, 2017 “existing vessels” and allows for the installation of a BWTS on such vessels at the first renewal survey following
entry into force of the convention. In July 2017, the implementation scheme was further changed to require vessels with International
Oil Pollution Prevention (“IOPP”) certificates expiring between September 8, 2017 and September 8, 2019 to comply
at their second IOPP renewal. Each vessel in our current fleet has been issued a Ballast Water Management Plan Statement of Compliance
by the classification society with respect to the applicable IMO regulations and guidelines. All our vessels are equipped with
U.S. Coast Guard approved BWTS except four vessels that still require certain additional upgrades.
Polar Code: In November 2014 and May 2015, the IMO’s Maritime Safety Committee
and MEPC, respectively, each adopted relevant parts of the International Code for Ships Operating in Polar Water (the “Polar
Code”). The Polar Code entered into force on January 1, 2017. The Polar Code covers design, construction, equipment, operational,
training, search and rescue as well as environmental protection matters relevant to ships operating in the waters surrounding
the two poles. It also includes mandatory measures regarding safety and pollution prevention as well as recommendatory provisions.
Ships intending to operate in the applicable areas must have a Polar Ship Certificate. This requires an assessment of operating
in said waters and includes operational limitations, additional safety equipment and plans or procedures, necessary to respond
to incidents involving possible safety or environmental consequences. A Polar Water Operational Manual is also needed on board
the ship for the owner, operator, master, and crew to have sufficient information regarding the ship to assist in their decision-making
process. The Polar Code applies to new ships constructed after January 1, 2017. After January 1, 2018, ships constructed before
January 1, 2017 are required to meet the relevant requirements by the earlier of their first intermediate, or renewal survey.
These requirements have not had and we do not expect they will have a material effect on our operations.
Discharge of garbage: MARPOL Annex V seeks to eliminate and reduce the amount
of garbage being discharged into the sea from ships. MARPOL Annex V generally prohibits the discharge of all garbage into the
sea, except as provided. Under MARPOL Annex V, garbage includes all kinds of food, domestic and operational waste, all plastics,
cargo residues, incinerator ashes, cooking oil, fishing gear, and animal carcasses generated during the normal operation of the
ship and liable to be disposed of continuously or periodically. The IMO adopted new guidelines in 2012 under the revised Annex V
to MARPOL, which prohibit discharge of garbage into the open sea, with certain exceptions, and require vessels to dispose of garbage
at port garbage reception facilities. These guidelines became effective in January 2013. These requirements have not had
and we do not expect they will have a material effect on our operations.
Discharges of oily substances, at sea: MARPOL Annex I covers all the fluids which
contain oil and can be discharged overboard at sea. The affirmed objective of MARPOL Annex I, which entered into force on 2nd
October 1983, is to protect the marine environment through the complete elimination of pollution by oil and other damaging elements
and to lessen the chances of accidental discharge of any such elements.
Discharges of sewage: MARPOL Annex IV contains a set of regulations regarding
the discharge of sewage into the sea from ships, including regulations regarding the ships’ equipment and systems for the
control of sewage discharge, the provision of port reception facilities for sewage, and requirements for survey and certification.
Bunker Convention: In 2001, the IMO adopted the International Convention on Civil
Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage (the “Bunker Convention”), which imposes strict liability on ship owners
for pollution damage in jurisdictional waters of ratifying states caused by discharges of bunker fuel. The Bunker Convention also
requires registered owners of ships over 1,000 gross tons to maintain insurance in specified amounts to cover their liability
for relevant pollution damage. The Bunker Convention became effective on November 21, 2008. Liability limits under the Bunker
Convention were increased as of June 2015. With respect to non-ratifying states, including the United States, liability for spills
and releases of oil carried as bunker in ship’s bunkers typically is determined by the national or other domestic laws in
the jurisdiction where the events or damages occur. The IMO also adopted a requirement, which became effective in 2011, that vessels
traveling through the Antarctic region (waters south of latitude 60
degrees south) must use lower density fuel. This requirement has not had and we do not
expect that it will have a material effect on our operations, which do not involve Antarctic travel.
ISM Code: The operation of our vessels is also affected by the requirements set
forth in the IMO’s International Safety Management (“ISM”) Code. The ISM Code requires vessel owners or any
other person, such as a manager or bareboat charterer, who has assumed responsibility for the operation of a vessel from the vessel
owner and on assuming such responsibility has agreed to take over all the duties and responsibilities imposed by the ISM Code,
to develop and maintain an extensive SMS that includes the adoption of a safety and environmental protection policy setting forth
instructions and procedures for safe operation and describing procedures for dealing with emergencies. The ISM Code requires that
vessel operators obtain a “Safety Management Certificate” for each vessel they operate from the government of the
vessel’s flag state. The certificate verifies that the vessel operates in compliance with its approved SMS. Currently, our
Managers have the requisite documents of compliance and safety management certificates for each of the vessels in our fleet for
which the certificates are required by the IMO. Our Managers are required to renew these documents of compliance and safety management
certificates every five years. Compliance is externally verified on an annual basis for the Managers and between the second and
third years for each vessel by the applicable flag state.
Although all our vessels are currently ISM Code-certified,
such certification may not be maintained by all our vessels at all times. Non-compliance with the ISM Code may subject such party
to increased liability, invalidate existing insurance or decrease available insurance coverage for the affected vessels and result
in a denial of access to, or detention in, certain ports. For example, the U.S. Coast Guard and E.U. authorities have indicated
that vessels not in compliance with the ISM Code will be prohibited from trading in U.S. and E.U. ports.
The Maritime Labour Convention: The International Labour Organization’s
Maritime Labour Convention was adopted in 2006 (“MLC 2006”). The basic aims of the MLC 2006 are to ensure comprehensive
worldwide protection of the rights of seafarers (the MLC 2006 is sometimes called the Seafarers’ Bill of Rights) and, to
establish a level playing field for countries and ship owners committed to providing decent working and living conditions for
seafarers, protecting them from unfair competition on the part of substandard ships. The MLC 2006 was ratified on August 20, 2012,
and all our vessels were certified by August 2013, as required. The MLC 2006 requirements have not had, and we do not expect that
they will have, a material effect on our operations.
U.S. Regulations
The U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990: OPA 90 established an extensive regulatory
and liability regime for the protection of the environment from oil spills and cleanup of oil spills. OPA 90 applies to discharges
of any oil from a vessel, including discharges of fuel and lubricants. OPA 90 affects all owners and operators whose vessels trade
in the U.S., its territories and possessions or whose vessels operate in U.S. waters, which includes the U.S.’ territorial
sea and its two hundred nautical mile exclusive economic zone. While our vessels do not carry oil as cargo, they do carry lubricants
and fuel oil (“bunkers”), which subjects our vessels to the requirements of OPA 90.
Under OPA 90, vessel owners, operators and bareboat charterers are “responsible
parties” and are jointly, severally and strictly liable (unless the discharge of pollutants results solely from the act
or omission of a third party, an act of God or an act of war) for all containment and clean-up costs and other damages arising
from discharges, or threatened discharges, of pollutants from their vessels, including bunkers.
OPA 90 preserves the right to recover damages under other existing laws, including maritime
tort law.
Effective December 21, 2015, the U.S. Coast Guard adopted regulations that adjust the
limits of liability of responsible parties under OPA 90 and established a procedure for adjusting the limits for inflation every
three years. Effective November 12, 2019, those limits were adjusted to the greater of $1,200 per gross ton or $997,100 per non-tank
vessel. On December 23, 2022, the U.S. Coast Guard again adjusted those limits to the greater of $1,300 per gross ton or $1,076,000
per non-tank vessel. These latest adjustments are expected to take effect on March 23, 2023. These limits of liability do not
apply if an incident was directly caused by violation of applicable U.S. safety, construction or operating regulations or by a
responsible party’s gross negligence or willful misconduct, or if the responsible party fails or refuses to report the incident
or to cooperate and assist in connection with oil removal activities.
All owners and operators of vessels over 300 gross tons are required to establish and
maintain with the U.S. Coast Guard evidence of financial responsibility sufficient to meet their potential aggregate liabilities
under OPA 90 and CERCLA, which is discussed below. An owner or operator of a fleet of vessels is required only to demonstrate
evidence of financial responsibility in an amount sufficient to cover the vessel in the fleet having the greatest maximum liability
under OPA 90 and CERCLA. We have complied with these requirements by providing a financial guarantee evidencing sufficient self-insurance.
We have satisfied these requirements and obtained a U.S. Coast Guard certificate of financial responsibility for all of our vessels.
The U.S. Coast Guard’s regulations concerning certificates of financial responsibility
provide, in accordance with OPA 90, that claimants may bring suit directly against an insurer or guarantor that furnishes certificates
of financial responsibility and that the insurer or guarantor may only assert limited defenses. Certain organizations that had
typically provided certificates of financial responsibility under pre-OPA 90 laws, including the major protection and indemnity
organizations, have declined to furnish evidence of insurance for vessel owners and operators if they are subject to direct actions
or required to waive insurance policy defenses. This requirement may limit the availability of coverage required by the U.S. Coast
Guard and could increase our costs of obtaining this insurance for our fleet, as well as the costs of our competitors that also
require such coverage.
We currently maintain, for each of our vessels, oil pollution liability coverage insurance
in the amount of $1.0 billion per incident. Although our vessels carry a relatively small amount of bunkers, a spill of oil from
one of our vessels could be catastrophic under certain circumstances. We also carry hull and machinery protection and indemnity
insurance to cover the risks of fire and explosion.
Losses as a result of fire or explosion could be catastrophic under some conditions.
While we believe that our existing insurance coverage is adequate, not all risks can be insured and there can be no guarantee
that any specific claim will be paid, or that we will always be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at reasonable rates.
If the damages from a catastrophic spill exceed our insurance coverage, the payment of those damages could have a severe, adverse
effect on us and could possibly result in our insolvency.
OPA 90 requires the owner or operator of any non-tank vessel of 400 gross tons or more
that carries oil of any kind as a fuel for main propulsion, including bunkers, to prepare and submit a response plan for each
vessel. These vessel response plans include detailed information on actions to be taken by vessel personnel to prevent or mitigate
any discharge or substantial threat of such a discharge of ore from the vessel due to operational activities or casualties. All
of our vessels have U.S. Coast Guard-approved response plans.
OPA 90 specifically permits individual states to impose their own liability regimes with
regard to oil pollution incidents occurring within their boundaries, and some states have enacted legislation providing for unlimited
liability for oil spills. In some cases, states which have enacted such legislation have not yet issued implementing regulations
defining vessels owners’ responsibilities under these laws. We intend to comply with all applicable state regulations in
the ports where our vessels call.
The U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act: CERCLA
applies to spills or releases of hazardous substances other than petroleum or petroleum products, whether on land or at sea. CERCLA
imposes joint and several liability, without regard to fault, on the owner or operator of a ship, vehicle or facility from which
there has been a release, and on other specified parties. Liability under CERCLA is generally limited to the greater of $300 per
gross ton or $0.5 million per vessel carrying non-hazardous substances ($5.0 million for vessels carrying hazardous substances),
unless the incident is caused by gross negligence, willful misconduct or a violation of certain regulations, in which case liability
is unlimited. As described above, owners and operators of vessels must establish and maintain with the U.S. Coast Guard evidence
of financial responsibility sufficient to meet their potential liabilities under CERCLA.
The U.S. Clean Water Act: The CWA prohibits the discharge of oil or hazardous
substances in navigable waters and imposes strict liability in the form of penalties for any unauthorized discharges. It also
imposes substantial liability for the costs of removal, remediation and damages and complements the remedies available under the
more recently enacted OPA 90 and CERCLA, discussed above. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) regulates
the discharge in U.S. ports of ballast water and other substances incidental to the normal operation of vessels. Under EPA regulations,
commercial vessels greater than 79 feet in length are required to obtain coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (“NPDES”) the VGP to discharge ballast water and other wastewater into U.S. waters by submitting a Notice of
Intent (a “NOI”). The VGP requires vessel owners and operators to comply with a range of best management practices
and reporting and other requirements for a number of incidental discharge types and incorporates current U.S. Coast Guard requirements
for ballast water management, as well as supplemental ballast water requirements. We have submitted NOIs for our vessels operating
in U.S. waters and anticipate incurring costs to meet the requirements of the VGP. In addition, various states have enacted legislation
restricting ballast water discharges and the introduction of non-indigenous species considered to be invasive. These and any similar
ballast water discharge restrictions enacted in the future could increase the costs of operating in the relevant waters.
The 2013 VGP became effective in December 2013 and remains in effect during the
implementation of the 2018 Vessel Incident Discharge Act (the “VIDA”), as discussed below. The 2013 VGP requires most
vessels to meet numeric ballast water discharge limits on a staggered schedule based on the first dry docking after January 1,
2014, or January 1, 2016 (depending on vessel ballast capacity). The 2013 VGP also imposes more strict technology-based limits
in the form of best management practices for discharges related to oil-to-sea interfaces and requires routine inspections, monitoring,
reporting, and recordkeeping. The 2013 VGP also requires vessel modifications and the installation of ballast treatment equipment
which will significantly increase the cost of investments to comply with such requirements.
For the first time, the 2013 VGP contains numeric ballast water discharge limits for
most vessels. The 2013 VGP also contains more stringent effluent limits for oil to sea interfaces and exhaust gas scrubber washwater,
which will improve environmental protection of U.S. waters. The EPA has also improved the efficiency of several of the VGP’s
administrative requirements, including allowing electronic recordkeeping, requiring an annual report in lieu of the one-time report
and annual noncompliance report, and requiring small vessel owners and/or operators to obtain coverage under the VGP by completing
and agreeing to the terms of a Permit Authorization and Record of Inspection form. The 2013 vessel general permit requires the
use of an environmentally acceptable lubricant for all oil to sea interfaces for vessels or alternative seal systems, unless technically
infeasible. The intent of this new requirement is to reduce the environmental impact of lubricant discharges on the aquatic ecosystem
by increasing the use of environmentally acceptable lubricants for vessels operating in waters of the U.S. We believe all our
vessels are in compliance with the 2013 VGP.
On December 4, 2018, the VIDA was signed into law, establishing a new framework for the
regulation of vessel incidental discharges under the CWA. The VIDA requires the EPA to develop performance standards for those
discharges within two years of enactment and requires the U.S. Coast Guard to develop implementation, compliance and enforcement
regulations within two years of the EPA’s promulgation of standards. Under the VIDA, all provisions of the 2013 VGP will
remain in force and effect until the U.S. Coast Guard’s regulations are finalized. On October 26, 2020, the EPA published
a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking – Vessel Incident Discharge National Standards of Performance in the Federal Register for
public comment. The comment period closed on November 25, 2020.
U.S. Air Emission Requirements: In 2008, the U.S. ratified the amended Annex VI
of MARPOL, addressing air pollution from ships, which went into effect in 2009. In December 2009, the EPA announced its intention
to publish final amendments to the emission standards for new marine diesel engines installed on ships flagged or registered in
the U.S. that are consistent with
standards required under recent amendments to Annex VI of MARPOL. The regulations include
near-term standards that began in 2011 for newly built engines requiring more efficient use of engine technologies in use today
and long-term standards that began in 2016 requiring an 80 percent reduction in nitrogen oxide emissions below current standards.
The CAA also requires states to adopt State Implementation Plans (“SIPs”) designed to attain air quality standards.
Several SIPs regulate emissions resulting from vessel loading and unloading operations by requiring the installation of vapor
control equipment.
On November 1, 2022, amendments to MARPOL Annex VI adopted by the IMO came into effect.
These “goal” or “performance-based” amendments are both of a technical and an operational nature, and
they require ships to improve their energy efficiency with a view to reducing their greenhouse gas emissions, with a particular
focus on carbon emissions. The U.S. Coast Guard is working to implement the amended provisions of MARPOL Annex VI, chiefly through
proposed rule 1625-AC78, which remains at the proposed rule stage since its original publication in October of 2022. The amended
MARPOL provisions and the rules proposed by the U.S. Coast Guard to implement them, in addition to any other new or more stringent
air emission regulations which may be adopted could require significant capital expenditures to retrofit vessels and could otherwise
increase our investment and operating costs.
Other Environmental Initiatives
The E.U. has adopted legislation that (1) requires member states to refuse access to
their ports by certain substandard vessels, according to vessel type, flag and number of previous detentions; (2) obliges member
states to inspect at least 25.0% of vessels using their ports annually and increase surveillance of vessels posing a high risk
to maritime safety or the marine environment; (3) provides the E.U. with greater authority and control over classification societies,
including the ability to seek to suspend or revoke the authority of negligent societies; and (4) requires member states to impose
criminal sanctions for certain pollution events, such as the unauthorized discharge of tank washings. It is also considering legislation
that will affect the operation of vessels and the liability of owners for oil pollution. While we do not believe that the costs
associated with our compliance with these adopted and proposed E.U. initiatives will be material, it is difficult to predict what
additional legislation, if any, may be promulgated by the E.U. or any other country or authority.
Several U.S. states, such as California, adopted more stringent legislation or regulations
relating to the permitting and management of ballast water discharges compared to EPA regulations. These requirements do not currently
impact our operational costs, as such technologies are not currently available. However if a decision is made to comply with such
requirements, we could incur additional investment during the installation of any such ballast water treatment plants.
On June 29, 2017, the Global Industry Alliance (the “GIA”) was officially
inaugurated. The GIA is a program, under the Global Environmental Facility-United Nations Development Program-IMO project, which
supports shipping, and related industries, as they move towards a low carbon future. Organizations including, but not limited
to, ship owners, operators, classification societies, and oil companies, signed to launch the GIA.
The China Maritime Safety Administration (the “China MSA”) issued the Regulation
on Data Collection of Energy Consumption for Ships in November 2018. This regulation is effective as of January 1, 2019 and requires
ships calling on Chinese ports to report fuel consumption and transport work details directly to the China MSA. This regulation
also contains additional requirements for Chinese-flagged vessels (domestic and international) and other non-Chinese-flagged international
navigating vessels. In November 2022, the China MSA published an additional Regulation of Administrative Measures of Ship Energy
Consumption Data and Carbon Intensity, which came into effect on December 22, 2022. This regulation was essentially enacted to
implement MARPOL Annex VI to Chinese-flagged vessels, though a few of its provisions also apply to foreign ships with a gross
tonnage of at least 400 entering and exiting Chinese ports. This Regulation essentially applies more stringent rules around that
collection and reporting of data related to ships’ energy consumption, as is already required by the 2018 regulation.
The United States is currently experiencing changes in its environmental policy, the
results of which have yet to be fully determined. For example, in April 2017, the U.S. President signed an executive order regarding
the environment that targets the United States’ offshore energy strategy, which affects parts of the maritime industry and
may affect our business operations. In 2021, the United States announced its commitment to working with the IMO to adopt a goal
of achieving zero emissions from international shipping by 2050. Additional legislation or regulation applicable to the operation
of our ships that may be implemented in the future could negatively affect our profitability.
Inventory of Hazardous Materials
Hong Kong Convention: On May 15, 2009, the IMO adopted the Hong Kong International Convention
for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships, 2009 (the “Hong Kong Convention”). The Hong Kong Convention
will enter into force two years after it has been ratified by 16 states representing 40% of the world fleet. The Hong Kong Convention
has not yet entered into force. One of the key requirements of the Hong Kong Convention will be for ships over 500 gross tonnes
operating in international waters to maintain an Inventory of Hazardous Materials (an “IHM”). Only warships, naval
auxiliary and governmental, non-commercial vessels are exempt from the requirements of the Hong Kong Convention. The IHM has three
parts:
|
~ |
Part I - hazardous materials inherent in the ship’s
structure and fitted equipment; |
|
~ |
Part II - operationally generated wastes; and |
|
~ |
Part III - stores. |
Once the Hong Kong Convention has entered into force, each
new and existing ship will be required to maintain Part I of IHM.
E.U. Ship Recycling Regulation: On November 20, 2013,
the E.U. adopted Regulation (EU) No 1257/2013 (the “E.U. Ship Recycling Regulation”), which seeks to facilitate the
ratification of the Hong Kong Convention and sets forth rules relating to vessel recycling and management of hazardous materials
on vessels. In addition to new requirements for the recycling of vessels, the
E.U. Ship Recycling Regulation contains rules for the control and proper management of
hazardous materials on vessels and prohibits or restricts the installation or use of certain hazardous materials on vessels. The
E.U. Ship Recycling Regulation applies to vessels flying the flag of an E.U. member state and certain of its provisions apply
to vessels flying the flag of a third country calling at a port or anchorage of a member state. For example, when calling at a
port or anchorage of a member state, a vessel flying the flag of a third country will be required, among other things, to have
on board an IHM that complies with the requirements of the E.U. Ship Recycling Regulation and the vessel must be able to submit
to the relevant authorities of that member state a copy of a statement of compliance issued by the relevant authorities of the
country of the vessel’s flag verifying the inventory. The E.U. Ship Recycling Regulation took effect on non-E.U.-flagged
vessels calling on E.U. ports of call beginning as of December 31, 2020.
Vessel Security Regulations
Several initiatives have been implemented to enhance vessel security. On November 25,
2002, the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002 (the “MTSA”) came into effect. To implement certain portions
of the MTSA, the U.S. Coast Guard issued regulations in July 2003 requiring the implementation of certain security requirements
aboard vessels operating in waters subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. Similarly, in December 2002, amendments to SOLAS created
a chapter of the convention dealing specifically with maritime security. This chapter came into effect in July 2004 and imposes
various detailed security obligations on vessels and port authorities, most of which are contained in the International Ship and
Port Facilities Security Code (the “ISPS Code”). Among the various requirements are:
|
~ |
on-board installation of automatic information
systems to enhance vessel-to-vessel and vessel-to-shore communications; |
|
~ |
on-board installation of ship security alert systems; |
|
~ |
the development of vessel security plans; and |
|
~ |
compliance with flag state security certification requirements. |
The U.S. Coast Guard regulations, intended to align with international maritime security
standards, exempt non-U.S. vessels from MTSA vessel security measures, provided such vessels have on board a valid “International
Ship Security Certificate” that attests to the vessel’s compliance with SOLAS security requirements and the ISPS Code.
We have implemented the various security measures addressed by the IMO, SOLAS and the ISPS Code, and we have approved ISPS certificates
and plans on board all our vessels, which have been certified by the applicable flag state.
Cyber Security
Recent action by the IMO’s Maritime Safety Committee and U.S. agencies indicate
that cyber security regulations for the maritime industry are likely to be further developed in the near future in an attempt
to combat cyber security threats. The Maritime Safety Committee, at its 98th session in June 2017, adopted Resolution MSC.428(98)
- Maritime Cyber Risk Management in Safety Management Systems. The resolution encouraged administrations to ensure that cyber
risks are appropriately addressed in existing safety management systems (as defined in the ISM Code) no later than the first annual
verification of the company’s Document of Compliance after January 1, 2021. In response to the above cyber security resolution
we performed a cyber security risk assessment for our vessels and implemented next generation firewall and incident reporting
for the majority of the vessels in our fleet, while we are in the process of concluding such implementation for the remaining
vessels. We also incorporated the cyber risk management system into the ship management system (SMS) for all vessels in our fleet.
Regulations on the Economic Substance Situation of the Marshall Islands
On January 1, 2019, the Economic Substance Regulations (ESRs), adopted by the Republic
of the Marshall Islands, entered into force. ESRs apply to all non-resident entities based in the Marshall Islands and to foreign
shipping entities registered in the Marshall Islands that meet the definition of “relevant entity” and derive income
from “related activity”. The term “relevant entity” according to the ESRs includes any non-domestic entity
based in the Marshall Islands or a “foreign maritime entity” established under Marshall Islands law which is centrally
managed and controlled outside the Marshall Islands and is a taxable entity of a state other than the Marshall Islands. The term
“relevant activity” according to the ESRs refers to certain restrictively mentioned activities, including “shipping”
and “holding business”, which may apply to us and our Subsidiaries governed by the law of the Marshall Islands. According
to the ESRs, for each annual reporting period, each relevant entity that earns income from a related activity should demonstrate
in the context of an audit of its financial position that (i) its administration and management in relation to the relevant activity
is carried out on Marshall Islands, (ii) its main business-related activity is in the Marshall Islands (although regulators understand
and recognize that the core income-generating activities of shipping companies generally take place in international waters),
and (iii) (a) has a sufficient amount of expenditure in the Marshall Islands, (b) has a sufficient physical presence in the Marshall
Islands, and (c) has a sufficient number of qualified employees in the Marshall Islands, taking into account the size of the relevant
activities in the Marshall Islands. As of July 1, 2020, all non-resident entities based in the Marshall Islands and the foreign
shipping entities of the Marshall Islands are required to submit a declaration of financial status within twelve (12) months of
their anniversary. The statement of financial situation is submitted to the corporate register on an annual basis. If the Corporate
Registry finds that an entity does not meet the financial status criteria for the relevant reporting period, it will issue a non-compliance
notice and impose penalties, which will be described in the notice. Penalties can range from fines of up to $ 100,000 and / or
revocation of the entity’s founding documents and dissolution. We intend to comply with all relevant ESR reporting requirements.
Coronavirus Outbreak
As of March 2020, the outbreak of Covid-19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health
Organization. Covid-19 has resulted in globally reduced industrial activity with lower demand for cargoes such as iron ore and
coal, contributing to lower drybulk rates in 2020. The outbreak of Covid-19 in China and other countries in early 2020, led to
a number of countries, ports and organizations
to take measures against its spread, such as quarantines
and restrictions on travel. Such measures were taken initially in Chinese ports, where we conduct a large part of our operations, and
gradually expanded to other countries globally covering most ports where we conduct business. These measures have and to the extent that
the pandemic is not controlled may continue to cause trade disruptions due to, among other things, the unavailability of personnel, increased
risks to our crew and personnel’s well-being and operations and delays and increased expenses in substituting crew members. We
operate in a sector of the economy that has been and to the extent that the pandemic is not controlled may continue to be adversely impacted
by the effects of trade disruptions due to the spread of Covid-19, including the Delta variant, the Omicron variant, or other potential
new Covid-19 variants. Such trade disruptions had adversely affected the level of imports to and exports from China and other countries,
which in turn had adversely affected the demand for our services, our business and results of operations, dry bulk shipping rates and
the international shipping industry as a whole. The global slowdown of manufacturing as a result of Covid-19, also reflected in the GDP
drop by 3.5% in 2020 according to the international monetary fund (“IMF”) data, had an impact on the global supply chain
along with a consequential impact on construction projects and other downstream industries which had an adverse effect on our business.
Disruption had spread to other markets, including key dry bulk and other commodity markets (e.g. iron ore, copper, zinc, nickel and lithium).
Our business and the drybulk shipping industry as a whole has been impacted not only from a reduced demand for drybulk shipping services,
but also from a reduced workforce and delays of crew changes as a result of quarantines applicable in several countries and ports, delays
of vessels as a result of port checks due to cases, or suspected cases, of Covid-19, and its variants, amongst crew and diversion of
vessels to ports where crew changes continued to take place.
Furthermore, scheduled dry-dockings, annual and intermediate
surveys and unscheduled ship repairs and upgrades, have been delayed as a result of the impact of the Covid-19 outbreak on the repair
yard workforce and the availability and transportation ability of technical teams to attend vessels. Any such delays or any failures
to conduct repairs or upgrades, drydockings or surveys in a timely manner may affect our results of operations. During the fourth quarter
of 2022, there has been a negative effect from the COVID-19 pandemic on our results of operations and financial condition due to crew
repatriation and related costs of about $0.5 million compared to the respective pre-COVID-19 period. The Company has worked extensively
to find solutions focusing on effectively managing crew changes despite such ongoing port lockdowns and travel restrictions. Difficulties
have also been presented in relation to secondhand vessel acquisitions and vessel sales deliveries.
Presently, travel restrictions have been eased in most
parts of the world, including China in the first quarter of 2023, however it is not known how the pandemic will develop in the future.
Following the Chinese economy opening in early 2023, if
the pandemic continues within 2023 and similar restrictive measures are adopted for its control, delays may be expected in relation to
the deliveries of our newbuilds and our newbuild program, which will affect our results of operations and our financial condition.
The extent and duration to which the Covid-19 outbreak
and measures taken in response thereto may continue to negatively impact our business, financial performance and operating results, remain
largely uncertain and dependent on future developments that cannot be accurately predicted at this time, such as the severity and transmission
rate of the various new Covid-19 types, the extent to which vaccines are available to our crew, and the effectiveness of the containment
actions taken, including travel and cargo restrictions, and the impact of these and other factors on the shipping industry as a whole.
As a result, it is not possible to ascertain the overall impact of Covid-19 on our business. However, the occurrence of any of the foregoing
events or other epidemics or an increase in the severity or duration of Covid-19 and any new virus wave, could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition, value of our vessels, and our ability to pay dividends.
Disclosure of Activities Pursuant to Section 13(r) of the
U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human
Rights Act of 2012 added Section 13(r) to the Exchange Act. Section 13(r) requires an issuer to disclose whether it or any of its affiliates
knowingly engaged in certain activities, transactions or dealings relating to Iran. Disclosure is required even where the activities,
transactions or dealings are conducted in compliance with applicable law. Provided in this section is information concerning the activities
of us and our affiliates that occurred in 2022 and which we believe may be required to be disclosed pursuant to Section 13(r) of the
Exchange Act.
In 2022, our vessels did not make any port calls to Iran.
Our charter party agreements for our vessels restrict the
charterers from calling in Iran in violation of E.U., U.S. or United Nation sanctions and that has not been authorized by the Office
of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the Treasury. There can be no assurance that our vessels will not, from time to time
in the future on charterer’s instructions, perform voyages which would require disclosure pursuant to Exchange Act Section 13(r).
On January 16, 2016, the U.S. and the E.U. lifted nuclear-related
sanctions on Iran through the implementation of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (“JCPOA”) among the P5+1 (China, France,
Germany, Russia, the U.K. and the U.S.), the E.U. and Iran to ensure that Iran’s nuclear program will be exclusively peaceful.
All activities, transactions and dealings reported in this section occurred after the implementation of the JCPOA. However, U.S. nuclear-related
sanctions have been re-imposed effective August 7, 2018 and November 5, 2018 as a result of the withdrawal of the U.S. from the JCPOA.
We may charter our vessels to charterers and sub-charterers, including, as the case may be, Iran-related parties, who may make, or may
sublet the vessels to sub-charterers who may make, port calls to Iran, so long as the activities continue to be permissible and not sanctionable
under applicable U.S. and E.U. and other applicable laws.
Seasonality
We operate our vessels in markets that have
historically exhibited seasonal variations in demand and, as a result, in charter rates. Seasonality is related to several factors
and may result in quarter-to-quarter volatility in our results of operations, which could
affect the amount of dividends, if any, that we pay to
our shareholders. For example the market for marine drybulk transportation services is typically stronger in the fall months in anticipation
of increased consumption of coal in the northern hemisphere during the winter months and the grain export season from North America.
Similarly, the market for marine drybulk transportation services is typically stronger in the spring months in anticipation of the South
American grain export season due to increased distance traveled known as ton mile effect, as well as increased coal imports in parts
of Asia due to additional electricity demand for cooling during the summer months. Demand for marine drybulk transportation services
is typically weaker at the beginning of the calendar year and during the summer months. In addition, unpredictable weather patterns during
these periods tend to disrupt vessel scheduling and supplies of certain commodities.
C. |
Organizational Structure |
Safe Bulkers, Inc. is a holding company with 65 subsidiaries,
23 of which are incorporated in Liberia, 41 in the Republic of the Marshall Islands and 1 in the Republic of Cyprus, each as of February 24,
2023. Our subsidiaries are ultimately wholly-owned by us. A list of our subsidiaries as of February 24, 2023 is set forth in Exhibit
8.1 to this annual report.
D. |
Property, Plant and Equipment |
We have no freehold or material leasehold interest in any
real property. We occupy office space at Apt. D11, Les Acanthes, 6, Avenue des Citronniers, MC98000 Monaco, where our principal executive
office is established. We also occupy office space at 5th floor, 61 rue du Rhone, 1204, Geneva, Switzerland, where a representation office
is established. Other than our vessels, we do not have any material property. Certain of our vessels are subject to priority mortgages,
which secure our obligations under our various credit facilities. For further details regarding our credit facilities, see “Item
5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Credit Facilities.”
ITEM
4A.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
|
None. |
|
|
|
ITEM
5.
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS |
|
The following discussion of our financial condition and
results of operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes to those statements included elsewhere
in this annual report. This discussion includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. As a result of many
factors, such as those set forth under “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this annual report,
our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements. Please see the section “Forward-Looking
Statements” at the beginning of this annual report.
Overview
Our business is to provide international marine drybulk
transportation services by operating vessels in the drybulk sector of the shipping industry. We deploy our vessels on a mix of period
time and spot time charters according to our assessment of market conditions, adjusting the mix of these charters to take advantage of
the relatively stable cash flow and high utilization rates associated with period time charters, or to profit from attractive spot time
charter rates during periods of strong charter market conditions, or to maintain employment flexibility that the spot market offers during
periods of weak time charter market conditions. We believe our customers, some of which have been chartering our vessels for over 26
years, enter into period time and spot time charters with us because of the quality of our modern vessels and our record of safe and
efficient operations.
Our Managers
Our operations are managed by our Managers, Safety Management,
Safe Bulkers Management Ltd., and Safe Bulkers Management Monaco, under the supervision of our executive officers and our board of directors.
Under our Management Agreements, our Managers provide us with technical, administrative and commercial services and our executive management.
All three of our Managers are controlled by Polys Hajioannou. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B.
Related Party Transactions—Management Agreements” for more information.
Selected Financial Data
The following table presents
selected consolidated financial and other data of Safe Bulkers, Inc. for each of the five years in the five year period ended
December 31, 2022. The selected consolidated financial data of Safe Bulkers, Inc. is a summary of, is derived from, and is qualified
by reference to, our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, which have been prepared in accordance with
United States (the “U.S.”) generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”).
Our audited consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’
equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022 and the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2021 and
2022, together with the notes thereto, are included in “Item 18. Financial Statements” and should be read in their entirety.
The historical results included below and elsewhere in
this document are not necessarily indicative of our future performance.
|
|
Year Ended December |
|
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2022 |
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars except share data) |
|
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
201,548 |
|
$ |
206,682 |
|
$ |
206,035 |
|
$ |
343,475 |
|
$ |
364,050 |
|
Commissions |
|
|
(8,357) |
|
|
(8,921) |
|
|
(7,877) |
|
|
(14,444) |
|
|
(14,332) |
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
193,191 |
|
$ |
197,761 |
|
$ |
198,158 |
|
$ |
329,031 |
|
$ |
349,718 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
(6,378) |
|
|
(13,715) |
|
|
(41,582) |
|
|
(9,753) |
|
|
(9,969) |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
(63,512) |
|
|
(68,569) |
|
|
(70,086) |
|
|
(72,049) |
|
|
(80,211) |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(48,067) |
|
|
(50,310) |
|
|
(54,269) |
|
|
(52,364) |
|
|
(49,518) |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management fee to related parties |
|
|
(16,536) |
|
|
(18,050) |
|
|
(18,884) |
|
|
(19,221) |
|
|
(17,723) |
|
Company administration expenses |
|
|
(2,706) |
|
|
(2,589) |
|
|
(2,618) |
|
|
(3,277) |
|
|
(4,079) |
|
Early redelivery (cost)/gain, net |
|
|
(105) |
|
|
(63) |
|
|
— |
|
|
7,470 |
|
|
— |
|
Other operating costs |
|
|
— |
|
|
(414) |
|
|
(241) |
|
|
— |
|
|
(3,570) |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
11,579 |
|
|
— |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
55,887 |
|
$ |
44,051 |
|
$ |
10,478 |
|
$ |
191,416 |
|
$ |
184,648 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(25,713) |
|
|
(26,815) |
|
|
(21,233) |
|
|
(14,719) |
|
|
(17,138) |
|
Other finance costs |
|
|
(973) |
|
|
(714) |
|
|
(641) |
|
|
(798) |
|
|
(1,353) |
|
Interest income |
|
|
929 |
|
|
1,558 |
|
|
604 |
|
|
69 |
|
|
783 |
|
Gain/(loss) on derivatives |
|
|
18 |
|
|
(121) |
|
|
(1,303) |
|
|
2,188 |
|
|
8,723 |
|
Foreign currency (loss)/gain |
|
|
(670) |
|
|
(76) |
|
|
916 |
|
|
(910) |
|
|
(1,101) |
|
Amortization
and write-off of deferred finance charges |
|
|
(1,794) |
|
|
(1,845) |
|
|
(1,726) |
|
|
(2,898) |
|
|
(2,008) |
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
27,684 |
|
$ |
16,038 |
|
$ |
(12,905) |
|
$ |
174,348 |
|
$ |
172,554 |
|
Earnings/(loss) per share of Common Stock, basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
(0.25) |
|
|
1.44 |
|
|
1.36 |
|
Cash dividends declared per share of Common Stock |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
0.20 |
|
Cash dividends declared per share of Preferred B Shares |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Cash dividends declared per share of Preferred C Shares |
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
2.00 |
|
Cash dividends declared per share of Preferred D Shares |
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
2.00 |
|
Weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding, basic and diluted |
|
|
101,604,339 |
|
|
101,686,312 |
|
|
102,617,944 |
|
|
113,716,354 |
|
|
120,653,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December |
|
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2022 |
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) |
|
OTHER FINANCIAL DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
85,449 |
|
$ |
58,284 |
|
$ |
63,376 |
|
$ |
217,208 |
|
$ |
218,046 |
|
Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities |
|
|
(63,670) |
|
|
(36,785) |
|
|
(34,784) |
|
|
8,554 |
|
|
(229,404) |
|
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities |
|
|
(15,580) |
|
|
8,540 |
|
|
(9,293) |
|
|
(225,906) |
|
|
(40,101) |
|
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash |
|
|
6,199 |
|
|
30,039 |
|
|
19,299 |
|
|
(144) |
|
|
(51,459) |
|
|
|
Year Ended December |
|
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2022 |
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) |
|
BALANCE SHEET DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
101,262 |
|
|
135,989 |
|
|
134,734 |
|
|
124,116 |
|
|
157,701 |
|
Total fixed assets |
|
|
963,887 |
|
|
964,000 |
|
|
951,290 |
|
|
952,813 |
|
|
1,077,400 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
11,050 |
|
|
14,654 |
|
|
19,605 |
|
|
17,391 |
|
|
10,817 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,076,199 |
|
|
1,114,643 |
|
|
1,105,629 |
|
|
1,094,320 |
|
|
1,245,918 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
54,606 |
|
|
86,784 |
|
|
104,715 |
|
|
88,692 |
|
|
91,317 |
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion and of deferred finance charges |
|
|
538,508 |
|
|
536,995 |
|
|
531,883 |
|
|
315,796 |
|
|
370,806 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
593,367 |
|
|
624,701 |
|
|
642,770 |
|
|
415,080 |
|
|
474,002 |
|
Mezzanine equity |
|
|
16,998 |
|
|
17,200 |
|
|
18,112 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value |
|
|
103 |
|
|
104 |
|
|
102 |
|
|
122 |
|
|
119 |
|
Total shareholders’ equity |
|
|
465,834 |
|
|
472,742 |
|
|
444,747 |
|
|
679,240 |
|
|
771,916 |
|
Total
liabilities and shareholders’ equity |
|
|
1,076,199 |
|
|
1,114,643 |
|
|
1,105,629 |
|
|
1,094,320 |
|
|
1,245,918 |
|
A. Operating Results
Our operating results are largely driven by the following
factors:
|
~ |
Ownership days. We define ownership days as the aggregate number of
days in a period during which each vessel in our fleet has been owned by us. Ownership days are an indicator of the size of our fleet
over a period and affect both the amount of revenues and the amount of expenses that we record during a period. |
|
~ |
Available days. We define available days (also referred to as voyage days) as
the total number of days in a period during which each vessel in our fleet was in our possession net of off-hire days associated
with scheduled maintenance, which includes major repairs, drydockings, vessel upgrades or special or intermediate surveys. Available
days are used to measure the number of days in a period during which vessels should be capable of generating revenues. |
|
~ |
Operating days. We define operating days as the number of our available days in
a period less the aggregate number of days that our vessels are off-hire due to any reason, excluding scheduled maintenance. Operating
days are used to measure the aggregate number of days in a period during which vessels actually generate revenues. |
|
~ |
Fleet utilization on ownership days.
We calculate fleet utilization on ownership days by dividing the number of our operating days during a period by the number of our
ownership days during that period. This measure demonstrates the percentage of time in the relevant period our vessels generate
revenue. During the three years ended December 31, 2022, our average annual fleet utilization on ownership days rate was
approximately 94.26%. |
|
~ |
Fleet utilization on available days. We calculate fleet utilization on available
days by dividing the number of operating days by the number of our available days during that period. Fleet utilization is used to
measure a company’s ability to efficiently find suitable employment for its vessels and minimize the number of days that its
vessels are off-hire for reasons such as scheduled repairs, vessel upgrades, drydockings or special surveys. During the three years
ended December 31, 2022, our average annual fleet utilization on available days rate was approximately 96.46%. |
|
~ |
Time charter equivalent rates. We define time charter equivalent rates (“TCE
rates”) as our revenues less commissions and voyage expenses during a period divided by the number of our available days during
the period. TCE rate is a standard shipping industry performance measure used primarily to compare daily earnings generated by vessels
on period time charters and spot time charters with daily earnings generated by vessels on voyage charters, because charter rates
for vessels on voyage charters are generally not expressed in per day amounts, while charter rates for vessels on period time charters
and spot time charters generally are expressed in such amounts. We use TCE to compare period-to-period changes in our performance
despite changes in the mix of charter types and it assists investors and our management in evaluating our financial performance.
We have only rarely employed our vessels on voyage charters and, as a result, generally our TCE rates approximate our time charter
rates. |
The following table reflects our revenues, commissions,
voyage expenses, time charter equivalent revenue, available days and time charter equivalent rate for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars except available
days and time charter equivalent rate) |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
343,475 |
|
$ |
364,050 |
|
Less commissions |
|
|
14,444 |
|
|
14,332 |
|
Less voyage expenses |
|
|
9,753 |
|
|
9,969 |
|
Time charter equivalent revenue |
|
$ |
319,278 |
|
$ |
339,749 |
|
Available days |
|
|
14,678 |
|
|
14,959 |
|
Time charter equivalent rate |
|
$ |
21,752 |
|
$ |
22,712 |
|
|
~ |
Daily vessel operating expenses. We define vessel operating expenses
to include the costs for crewing, insurance, lubricants, spare parts, provisions, stores, repairs, maintenance, statutory and classification
expense, drydocking, intermediate and special surveys, tonnage taxes and other miscellaneous items. Daily vessel operating expenses
are calculated by dividing vessel operating expenses by ownership days for the relevant period. Our ability to control our fixed
and variable expenses, including our daily vessel operating expenses, also affects our financial results. In addition, factors beyond
our control can cause our vessel operating expenses to increase, including developments relating to market premiums for insurance,
cost of lubricants and changes in the value of the U.S. dollar compared to currencies in which certain of our expenses are denominated,
such as certain crew wages. |
|
~ |
Daily vessel operating expenses excluding drydocking and pre-delivery expenses.
We calculate daily vessel operating expenses excluding drydocking and pre-delivery expenses by dividing vessel operating expenses
excluding drydocking and pre-delivery expenses for the relevant period by ownership days for such period. This measure assists our
management and investors by increasing the comparability of our performance from period to period. Drydocking expenses include costs
of shipyard, paints and agent expenses, and pre-delivery expenses include initially supplied spare parts, stores, provisions and
other miscellaneous items provided to a newbuild or second-hand acquisition prior to their operation, which costs may vary from period
to period. |
|
~ |
Daily general and administrative expenses. We define general and administrative
expenses to include daily management fees and daily company administration expenses as defined below. Daily vessel general and administrative
expenses are calculated by dividing general and administrative expenses by ownership days for the relevant period. |
|
~ |
Daily management fees. We define management fees to include the fees payable to
our Managers for managing our fleet. Daily management fees are calculated by dividing management fees by ownership days for the relevant
period. |
|
~ |
Daily company administration expenses. We define company administration expenses
to include expenses incurred related to the administration of our company such as legal costs, audit fees, independent directors’
compensation, listing fees to NYSE and other miscellaneous expenses. Daily company administration expenses are calculated by dividing
company administration expenses by ownership days for the relevant period. |
The following table reflects our ownership days, available
days, operating days, fleet utilization, TCE rates, daily vessel operating expenses, daily vessel operating expenses excluding drydocking
and pre-delivery expenses, daily general and administrative expenses and daily management fees for the periods indicated:
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2022 |
|
Ownership days |
|
|
14,916 |
|
|
15,321 |
|
Available days |
|
|
14,678 |
|
|
14,959 |
|
Operating days |
|
|
14,415 |
|
|
14,767 |
|
Fleet utilization on ownership days |
|
|
96.64% |
|
|
96.38% |
|
Fleet utilization on available days |
|
|
98.21% |
|
|
98.72% |
|
TCE rates |
|
$ |
21,752 |
|
$ |
22,712 |
|
Daily vessel operating expenses |
|
$ |
4,830 |
|
$ |
5,235 |
|
Daily vessel operating expenses excluding drydocking
and pre-delivery expenses |
|
$ |
4,529 |
|
$ |
4,738 |
|
Daily general and administrative expenses consisting of: |
|
$ |
1,508 |
|
$ |
1,423 |
|
(a) Daily management fees |
|
$ |
1,289 |
|
$ |
1,157 |
|
(b) Daily company administration expenses |
|
$ |
219 |
|
$ |
266 |
|
Revenues
Our revenues are driven primarily by the number of vessels
in our fleet, the number of days during which our vessels operate and the amount of daily charter rates that our vessels earn under our
charters, which, in turn, are affected by a number of factors, including:
|
~ |
levels of demand and supply in the drybulk shipping industry; |
|
~ |
the age, condition and specifications of our vessels; |
|
~ |
the duration of our charters; |
|
~ |
our decisions relating to vessel acquisitions and disposals; |
|
~ |
the amount of time that we spend positioning our vessels; |
|
~ |
the availability of our vessels, which is related to the amount of time that our vessels spend in
dry-dock undergoing repairs and the amount of time required to perform necessary maintenance or upgrade work; and |
|
~ |
other factors affecting charter rates for drybulk vessels. |
Revenue is recognized as earned on a straight-line basis
over the charter period in respect of charter agreements that provide for varying rates. The difference between the revenue recognized
and the actual charter rate is recorded either as unearned revenue or accrued revenue (see “—Unearned Revenue / Accrued Revenue”
below). Commissions (address and brokerage), regardless of charter type, are always charged to us and are deferred and amortized over
the related charter period and are presented as a separate line item in revenues to arrive at net revenues in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations.
Revenues are generated from time charters, period and spot,
and voyage charters. Revenues from our time charters comprised 98.6%, 98.3% and 100.0%, respectively, of our revenues for the years ended
December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022, from which our period time charters comprised 48.7%, 75.1% and 77.9%, respectively, and our spot time
charters comprised 49.9%, 23.2% and 22.1%, respectively, of our revenues for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022. Revenues
from voyage charters comprised 1.4%, 1.7% and zero of our total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2021, respectively. No
voyage charters were performed during the year ended December 31, 2022.
Unearned Revenue / Accrued Revenue
Unearned revenue as of December 31, 2022 includes: (i) cash
received prior to the balance sheet date relating to services to be rendered after the balance sheet date amounting to $5.3 million and
(ii) deferred revenue resulting from straight-line revenue recognition in respect of charter agreements that provide for variable
charter rates amounting to $11.6 million.
Unearned revenue as of December 31, 2021 includes: (i)
cash received prior to the balance sheet date relating to services to be rendered after the balance sheet date amounting to $7.0 million
and (ii) deferred revenue resulting from straight-line revenue recognition in respect of charter agreements that provide for variable
charter rates amounting to $12.0 million.
Accrued revenue as of December 31, 2022 represents revenue
in the amount of $0.9 million earned prior to cash being received in respect of charter agreements that provide for variable charter
rates.
Accrued revenue as of December 31, 2021 represents revenue
in the amount of $0.9 million earned prior to cash being received in respect of charter agreements that provide for variable charter
rates.
Commissions
We pay commissions currently reaching up to 5.0% on our
period time and spot time charters, to unaffiliated ship brokers, to brokers associated with our charterers and to our charterers. These
commissions are directly related to our revenues, from which they are deducted. The amount of our total commissions to unaffiliated ship
brokers and other brokers associated with our charterers and to our charterers might grow, as revenues increase due to improving market
conditions and delivery of our contracted newbuild vessels, or decrease as a result of deteriorating market conditions. These commissions
do not include fees we pay to our Managers, which are described under “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Management
of Our Fleet.”
Voyage Expenses
We charter our vessels primarily through period time charters
and spot time charters under which the charterer is responsible for most voyage expenses, such as the cost of bunkers, port expenses,
agents’ fees, canal dues, extra war risks insurance and any other expenses related to the cargo. We are responsible for the remaining
voyage expenses such as draft surveys, hold cleaning, bunkers during ballast period or for vessel repositioning, courier and other minor
miscellaneous expenses related to the voyage. We expect that our voyage expenses will decrease in the future if fewer vessels are employed
in the spot market, in which case vessel repositioning costs should decrease. We generally do not employ our vessels on voyage charters
under which we would be responsible for all voyage expenses.
Vessel Operating Expenses
Vessel operating expenses include costs for crewing, insurance,
lubricants, spare parts, provisions, stores, repairs, maintenance, statutory and classification expense, drydocking, intermediate and
special surveys, tonnage taxes and other minor miscellaneous items. We expect that our vessel operating expenses will slowly increase
in the future as our fleet grows. Our crewing costs, which are a significant part of our vessel operating expenses, may increase in the
future due to the limited supply and increase in demand for well-qualified crew. Furthermore, we expect that insurance costs, drydocking,
maintenance, spare parts and stores costs will increase from the levels achieved in 2022 as our vessels age. A portion of our vessel
operating expenses including crew wages paid to our Greek crew members are in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. These expenses may
increase or decrease as a result of fluctuation of the U.S. dollar against these currencies.
Depreciation
We depreciate our drybulk vessels on a straight-line basis
over the expected useful life of each vessel. Depreciation is based on the cost of the vessel less its estimated residual value. We estimate
the useful life of our vessels to be 25 years from the date of initial delivery from the shipyard. Second-hand vessels are depreciated
from the date of their acquisition through their remaining estimated useful life. Furthermore, we estimate the residual value of our
vessels is equal to the product of its lightweight tonnage and estimated scrap rate, which we previously estimated to be $182 per light-weight
ton. Effective January 1, 2022, we changed the estimate of vessels’ residual value, from a scrap rate of $182 per light weight
ton to $375 per light weight ton. The net income for the year ended December 31, 2022 would have been $163.9 million if there was no
change in the estimated scrap value, representing a $8.6 million reduction to the net income, and the basic and diluted net earnings
per share for the year ended December 31, 2022, would have been $1.28 per share and $1.28 per share, respectively, if there was no change
in the estimated scrap value, representing a $0.08 and $0.08 reduction to the basic and diluted net earnings per share, respectively.
Vessels, Net
Vessels are stated at their historical cost, which consists
of the contracted purchase price and any direct material expenses incurred upon acquisition (including improvements, on-site supervision
expenses incurred during the construction period if the vessels are newbuilds, commissions paid, delivery expenses and other expenditures
to prepare the vessel for her initial voyage), less accumulated depreciation and impairment charges, if any. Financing costs incurred
during the construction period of the vessels if the vessels are newbuilds are also capitalized and included in the vessels’ cost.
Certain subsequent expenditures for conversions and major improvements are also capitalized, if it is determined that they appreciably
extend the life, increase the earning capacity or improve the efficiency or safety of the vessels.
As of December 31, 2021 and 2022, we capitalized interest
amounting to $57 thousand and $513 thousand, respectively.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses consist of management
fees paid to our Managers and expenses incurred relating to the administration of the Company.
Management fees paid to our Managers include services offered
to us for managing our vessels (i.e., chartering, operations, technical, supply, crewing and accounting services), the services provided
to us by our executive officers as well as the preparation of disclosure documents and the preparation for compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act. Pursuant to the terms of the Management Agreements with our Managers, for the provision of such services, we pay a daily ship management
fee of €875 per vessel and pay Safe Bulkers Management Monaco an annual ship management fee of €3.50 million.
Expenses related to the administration of our company primarily
include legal costs, audit fees, independent directors’ compensation, listing fees to the NYSE and other miscellaneous expenses
such as director and officer liability insurance costs and public relations expenses.
Interest Expense and Other Finance Costs
We incur interest expense on outstanding indebtedness under
our existing loan and credit facilities, which we include in interest expense. We also incurred financing costs in connection with establishing
those facilities, which are deferred and amortized over the period of the facility. The amortization of the finance costs is included
in amortization and write-off of deferred finance charges. We will incur additional interest expense in the future on our outstanding
borrowings and under future borrowings.
Inflation
Inflation is expected to have a moderate effect on our
expenses given current economic conditions. In the event that significant global inflationary pressures appear, these pressures would
increase our financing expenses, operating, voyage and administrative expenses.
Early Redelivery Income/(Cost), Net
Early redelivery cost reflects amounts payable to charterers
for early termination of a period time charter resulting from our request for early redelivery of a vessel. We generally request such
early redelivery when we would like to take advantage of a favorable period time charter market environment and believe that an opportunity
to enter into a similarly priced period time charter is not likely to be available when the relevant vessel is scheduled to be redelivered.
Early redelivery income reflects amounts payable to us
for early termination of a period time charter resulting from a charterer’s request for early redelivery of a vessel. We may accept
such requests from charterers when we believe that we are compensated for a substantial portion of the contracted revenue, reduce our
third party risk or maintain the opportunity to re-employ the vessel either in the spot market or in the period time charter market at
adequate levels.
We have entered into such arrangements for early redelivery,
and incurred such costs or earned such income in the past and we may continue to do so in the future, depending on market conditions.
Year ended December 31, 2022 compared to year ended December
31, 2021
During the year ended December 31, 2022, we had an average
of 42.0 drybulk vessels in our fleet. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we had an average of 40.9 drybulk vessels in our fleet.
During the year ended December 31, 2022, we acquired the
newbuild Post Panamax vessel Climate Respect and the newbuild Kamsarmax vessel Vassos and the second-hand Capesize vessels Maria, Aghia
Sofia and Michalis H.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we acquired the
second-hand Panamax vessels Paraskevi 2 and Koulitsa 2 and the
second hand Post Panamax vessel Venus Harmony and we obtained
a right of use asset, the second-hand Capesize vessel Stelios Y.
Revenues
Revenues increased by 6.0%, or $20.6 million, to $364.1
million during the year ended December 31, 2022 from $343.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2021, mainly due to the prevailing
market rates and the additional revenues earned by our scrubber-fitted vessels.
Commissions
Commissions to unaffiliated ship brokers, other brokers
associated with our charterers and our charterers during the year ended December 31, 2022 amounted to $14.3 million, a decrease of $0.1
million, or 0.7%, compared to $14.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2021. Commissions as a percentage of revenues decreased
to 3.9% of revenues during the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to 4.2% of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Voyage expenses
During the year ended December 31, 2022, we recorded voyage
expenses of $10.0 million, compared to $9.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2021, a 2.0% increase mainly due to decreased
prices of fuel sold as well as increased quantity of bunkers consumed under certain time charters for which the Company receives variable
consideration based on charterers consumption.
Vessel operating expenses
Vessel operating expenses increased by 11.4% to $80.2 million
during the year ended December 31, 2022 from $72.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2021. Ownership days in 2022 compared to
2021 increased by 2.7%, to 15,321 days from 14,916. Daily operating expenses increased by 8.4% to $5,235 during the year ended December
31, 2022 from $4,830 during the year ended December 31, 2021.
Vessel operating expenses increased as a net result of
the following:
|
(i) |
the increase in crew wages, repatriation and related
crew costs expenses by 3.5% to $38.1 million in 2022, compared to $36.8 million in 2021, due to increased ownership days and increased
repatriation costs as a result of Covid travel restrictions; |
|
(ii) |
the increase in cost of spares, stores and provisions by 7.1% to
$16.6 million in 2022 compared to $15.5 million in 2021, primary due to increased transportation and delivery costs that have prevailed
in the market during 2022 and increased initial supplies for our second-hand and newbuild acquired vessels; |
|
(iii) |
the increase in repairs, maintenance and drydocking costs by 37.5%
to $12.1 million in 2022, compared to $8.8 million in 2021, primarily due to the increased dry docking cost of $6.7 million during
2022, compared to $4.1 million for the same period of 2021, as a result of increased costs for environmental upgrades, primarily
increased costs for surface preparation and application of low friction paints that have been applied during dry-dockings in 2022,
instead of the standard paints applied in the past, and increased transportation and delivery costs. During 2022, 6 drydockings were
fully completed and one partial completed, compared to 7 drydockings fully completed during 2021; |
|
(iv) |
the increase in lubricant costs by 34.2% to $5.1 million in 2022,
compared to $3.8 million in 2021, primarily due to increased lubricant unit prices and to a lesser extent to increased ownership
days in 2022 compared to 2021; and |
|
(v) |
the increase in insurance costs by 30.6% to $4.7 million in 2022,
compared to $3.6 million in 2021, primarily due to increased vessels’ insured value, reflecting increased insurance premium
and to a lesser extent to increased ownership days in 2022 compared to 2021. |
Other factors influencing vessel operating expenses, such
as taxes and other miscellaneous expenses, had a minor effect on the increased operating expenses.
The Company expenses drydocking and pre-delivery costs
as incurred, which costs may vary from period to period. Vessel operating expenses excluding vessel drydocking and pre-delivery costs
increased by 7.4% to $72.6 million in 2022, compared to $67.6 million in 2021, primarily due to increased vessel operating days, crew
wages, insurance and lubricant costs. Drydocking expense is related to the number of drydockings in each period and pre-delivery expense
is related to the number of vessel deliveries and second-hand acquisitions in each period. Certain other shipping companies may defer
and amortize drydocking expense. Daily operating expenses, excluding vessel drydocking and pre-delivery costs, increased by 4.6% to $4,738
during the year ended December 31, 2022 from $4,529 during the year ended December 31, 2021.
Gain on sale of assets
Gain on sale of assets amounted to zero during the year
ended December 31, 2022, compared to $11.6 during the year ended December 31, 2021, as a result of gain on the sale of 7 of our vessels
in 2021.
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization
expense decreased by 5.5% to $49.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $52.4 million during the year ended
December 31, 2021, as a result of the change in the estimate of vessels’ residual value, from a scrap rate of $182 per light
weight ton to $375 per light weight ton, effective January 1, 2022, partially set off by the increased number of vessels during
2022. The Net Income for the year ended December 31, 2022 would have been $163,910 if there was no change in the estimated scrap
value, representing a $8,644 reduction to the net income, and the basic and diluted net earnings per share for the year ended
December 31, 2022, would have been $1.28 per share and $1.28 per share, respectively, if there was no change in the estimated scrap
value, representing a $0.08 and $0.08 reduction to the basic and diluted net earnings per share, respectively.
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses decreased by 3.1% to
$21.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $22.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2021. The decrease
of $0.7 million is mainly due to the decrease in the management fees charged by our Managers of $17.7 million in 2022 from $19.2 million
in 2021. Management fees which are denominated in Euros decrease in 2022 compared to 2021 due to the weakening of the exchange rate of
Euro versus USD partially offset by the increase of ownership days from 14,916 in 2021 to 15,321 in 2022.
As a result:
|
~ |
Daily general and administrative expenses which consist of daily management fees
and daily company administration expenses, decreased by 5.6% to $1,423 during the year ended December 31, 2022, from $1,508 during
the year ended December 31, 2021; |
|
~ |
Daily management fees decreased by 10.2% to $1,157 during the year ended December 31, 2022, from
$1,289 during the year ended December 31, 2021; and |
|
~ |
Daily company administration expenses increased by 21.5% to $266 during the year ended December
31, 2022, from $219 during the year ended December 31, 2021. |
Interest expense
Interest expense increased by 16.3% to $17.1 million during
the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $14.7 million, during the year ended December 31, 2021. This was the combining effect of:
i) the increase in the weighted average interest rate of our outstanding indebtedness of 3.255% per annum (“p.a.”) for the
year ended December 31, 2022, compared to the weighted average interest rate of our outstanding indebtedness of 2.642% p.a. for the year
ended December 31, 2021 reflecting the increasing interest rate environment, and ii) the decrease in average loans outstanding of $520.8
million during the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to the average loans outstanding of $548.6 million during the year ended December
31, 2021. The total principal amount of loans outstanding as of December 31, 2022 was $422.6 million, compared to $360.3 million as of
December 31, 2021.
The discussion relating to the year ended December 31,
2021 compared to year ended December 31, 2020, can be found in the Company’s 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2021 filed with
the SEC on March 30, 2022, under ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS - Year ended December 31, 2021 compared to year
ended December 31, 2020.
B. Liquidity and Capital Resources |
|
As of December 31, 2022, we had liquidity of $319.3 million
consisting of cash, cash equivalents, bank time deposits and restricted cash of $123.3 million, $145.0 million available under our revolving
credit facilities, and up to $51.0 million available under financing agreements. We had an existing fleet of 44 vessels, one of which
held for sale, and nine newbuild vessels in our orderbook. Furthermore, we had contracted revenue of approximately $292.0 million, net
of commissions, from our non-cancellable spot and period time charter contracts, including contracted revenue linked to the BPI and BCI
index, calculated as of December 31, 2022, and excluding the Scrubber benefit, and additional borrowing capacity in relation to seven
unencumbered vessels and seven newbuilds upon their delivery. Our aggregate remaining contractual obligations as of December 31, 2022
were $850.5 million of which $242.6 million payable in 2023, $273.2 million payable in 2024 and 2025, $256.4 million payable in 2026
and 2027 and $78.3 million payable 2028 onwards. The aggregate remaining contractual obligations consist of:
|
i) |
$422.6 million of aggregate debt outstanding of which $45.7 million relates to
the current portion of long term debt payable within 2023; |
|
ii) |
$236.1 million of remaining capital expenditure requirements relating to the purchase consideration
of the nine newbuilds, of which $147.8 million payable in 2023; |
|
iii) |
$99.3 million of payments to our Managers which represent the daily and annual ship management fees,
the acquisition fees and the supervision fees, of which $24.1 million payable in 2023; |
|
iv) |
$89.8 million of interest and bond coupon payments, consisting of estimated interest payments we
expect to make with respect to our long-term debt obligations, reflecting an assumed LIBOR-based applicable interest rate of 5.138%
(using the six-month LIBOR rate as of December 31, 2022) and an assumed Term SOFR-based applicable interest rate of 4.78131% (using
the six-month Term SOFR rate as of December 31, 2022) plus the relevant margin of the applicable credit facility; and |
|
v) |
$2.7 million of the remaining vessel upgrades and improvements, relating to BWTS and Scrubber investments,
all payable in 2023. |
As of February 24, 2023, we had liquidity of $346.1
million consisting of cash, cash equivalents, bank time deposits and restricted cash of $95.6 million, $132.0 million available under
the revolving credit facilities and up to $118.5 million available under financing agreements. We had an existing fleet of 44 vessels
and nine newbuild vessels in our orderbook. Furthermore, we had contracted revenue of approximately $247.7 million, net of commissions,
from our non-cancellable spot and period time charter contracts, including contracted revenue linked to the BPI and BCI index, calculated
as of February 24, 2023, and excluding the scrubber benefit, and additional borrowing capacity in relation to seven unencumbered
vessels and six newbuilds upon their delivery. The aggregate remaining capital expenditure requirements for the acquisition of the nine
newbuilds, amounted to $250.3 million, of which $132.8 million is payable in 2023, $74.5 million payable in 2024 and $43.0 million payable
in 2025. Further we had $411.9 million of aggregate debt outstanding, of which $23.3 million relates to the current portion of long term
debt payable within the remainder of 2023.
Our primary liquidity needs are to fund financing expenses,
debt repayment or refinancing, vessel operating expenses, general and
administrative expenses, capital expenditures in relation
to vessel acquisitions and vessel improvements, redemption of preferred shares and dividend payments to our shareholders. We anticipate
that our primary sources of funds will be existing cash and cash equivalents and bank time deposits which as of December 31, 2022 amounted
to $113.4 million, cash generated from operations, available amounts under our revolving credit facilities of up to $145.0 million, committed
aggregate borrowing capacity of up to $51.0 million and, possibly, other future equity or debt financing.
In our opinion, the contracted cash flow from operations,
the committed borrowing capacity and the existing cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to fund the operations of our fleet and
any other present financial requirements of the Company, including our working capital requirements, and our capital expenditure requirements
at least through the end of the first quarter of 2024. However, we may seek and refinance our debt which may result in additional indebtedness
and/or deferring repayments to later periods, and/or lower interest rates to maintain a strong cash position. In addition we may issue
common equity including sales under our ATM Program. Future needs in relation to financing and investing activities may involve equity
issuance or refinancing of existing debt and financing of any future fleet replacement and expansion program or fleet upgrades and improvements,
in addition to use of our existing cash and operating cash surplus. Our ability to obtain bank financing or to access the capital markets
for future offerings may be limited by our financial condition at the time of any such financing or offering, including the actual or
perceived credit quality of our charterers and the market value of our fleet, as well as by adverse market conditions resulting from,
among other things, general economic conditions, weakness in the financial and equity markets and contingencies and uncertainties that
are beyond our control. To the extent that market conditions deteriorate, charterers may default or seek to renegotiate charter contracts,
and vessel valuations may decrease, resulting in a breach of our debt covenants. In addition, refinancing of our existing debt in the
future may be difficult. Our contracted revenues may decrease and we may be required to make additional prepayments under existing loan
facilities, resulting in additional financing needs.
A failure to fulfill our capital expenditures commitments
generally results in a forfeiture of advances paid with respect to the contracted newbuild vessel and a write-off of capitalized expenses.
In addition, we may also be liable for other damages for breach of contract. A failure to satisfy our financial commitments could result
in the acceleration of our indebtedness and foreclosure on our vessels. Such events could adversely impact the dividends we intend to
pay, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operation.
We paid dividends to our common shareholders each quarter
between the date of our initial public offering in June 2008 and the second quarter of 2015. In March 2022, we re-established paying
dividends to our common shareholders and have since paid another three quarterly consecutive dividends of $0.05 per common share, totaling
$24.1 million. In February 2023, we declared a cash dividend of $0.05 per share of Common Stock payable on March 17, 2023 to shareholders
of record on March 1, 2023.
During 2022, we declared and paid four quarterly consecutive
dividends of $0.50 per share of Series C Preferred Shares, totaling $2.4 million, and four quarterly consecutive dividends of $0.50 per
share of Series D Preferred Shares, totaling $6.4 million. In January 2023, we declared and paid a dividend of $0.50 per share for each
of Series C Preferred Shares, totaling $0.4 million, and of Series D Preferred Shares, totaling $1.6 million.
Our future liquidity needs will impact our dividend policy.
The declaration and payment of dividends, if any, will always be subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors of the Company.
There is no guarantee that the Company’s Board of Directors will determine to issue cash dividends in the future. The timing and
amount of any dividends declared will depend on, among other things: (i) the Company’s earnings, fleet employment profile, financial
condition and cash requirements and available sources of liquidity; (ii) decisions in relation to the Company’s growth, fleet renewal
and leverage strategies; (iii) provisions of Marshall Islands and Liberian law governing the payment of dividends; (iv) restrictive covenants
in the Company’s existing and future debt instruments; and (v) global economic and financial conditions. In addition, cash dividends
on our Common Stock are subject to the priority of dividends on our Preferred Shares.
On July 13, 2020, we filed a shelf registration statement
to prepare for our ATM Program. On August 7, 2020 we filed a prospectus supplement to commence our ATM Program of up to $23.5 million
of our common stock. We entered into a sales agreement with DNB Markets, Inc. (“DNB”) as our sales agent, relating to the
shares of our common stock, par value $0.001 per share, offered by this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. In accordance
with the terms of the sales agreement, we may, through our sales agent, offer and sell from time to time shares of our common stock having
an aggregate offering price of up to $23.5 million. On May 26, 2021, we entered into a second prospectus supplement in order to upsize
our ATM Program offering to $100.0 million. With DNB still engaged as our sales agent, we entered into Amendment No. 1 to the sales agreement
to continue our ATM Program. As of December 31, 2021, we had offered to sell and had sold 19,417,280 shares under the ATM program for
net proceeds of approximately $71.5 million. We have not offered to sell and had not sold any additional shares of common stock under
the ATM Program during the year ended December 31, 2022 and as of February 24, 2023.
In June 2022, we authorized a program under which we may
from time to time purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of our common stock. As of February 24, 2023, 2,807,418 shares of common stock
had been repurchased and cancelled under the repurchase program.
In February 2022, our wholly
owned subsidiary Safe Bulkers Participations successfully completed a public offer in Greece of €100,000,000 of an unsecured
bond that was admitted for trading in the Athens Exchange under the ticker symbol SBB1. The Bond is guaranteed by the Company,
is non-amortizing, matures in February 2027, and carries a coupon of 2.95% payable semi-annually. It may be redeemed early by
the Company in part or in full after February 2024, subject to the payment of premium ranging from 1.5% to 0.5% of the redeemed
amount depending on the timing of the redemption. The net proceeds of the offering were used for the acquisition of vessels. One
of the independent members of the board of directors of the Company currently serves as the Chief Executive Officer of the financial
institution that was the adviser and one of the lead underwriters in the public offer of the Bond. The transaction was evaluated
and approved by the board of directors of the Company excluding that indepen-
dent member of the board of directors of the Company.
As of December 31, 2022, and as of December 31, 2021, we
did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Cash Flows
Cash and cash equivalents decreased to $49.2 million as
of December 31, 2022, compared to $101.0 million as of December 31, 2021. We consider highly liquid investments such as time deposits
and certificates of deposit with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents were
primarily held in U.S. dollars.
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities amounted to $218.0
million in 2022 and $217.2 million in 2021, consisting of net income after non-cash items of $227.1 million and $210.5 million respectively
plus a decrease in working capital of $9.1 million and increase of $6.7 million during 2022 and 2021, respectively.
The major drivers of the change of net cash provided by
operating activities are the increased inflows related to net revenues of $20.7 million in 2022 compared to 2021, the increased outflows
related to interest expense of $2.4 in 2022 compared to 2021 and the increased outflows related to the operating expenses of $8.2 million
in 2022 compared to 2021. The major drivers of the cash outflow of the working capital during 2022 are the increased inventories of $13.2
million, as a result of the increased bunker inventory due to increased number of vessels in the spot market, the increased prepaid expenses
of $2.3 million as a result of the difference in the timing of payments and the decreased unearned revenue of $2.2 million as a result
of the timing of revenue collection, the recognition of straight line revenue for charter parties we entered in 2020 and 2021, and the
increased accrued liabilities of $4.7 million mainly due to increased accrued interest expenses, accrued repairs and maintenance services
and accrued sundries expenses, offset by decreased accrued other financial expenses and decreased accrued interest rate swap expenses.
Net Cash (Used in)/ Provided by Investing Activities
Net cash flows used in investing activities were $229.4
million for the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to cash flows provided by investing activities of $8.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2021. The increase in cash flows used in investing activities of $238.0 million from 2021 is mainly attributable to the
following factors: (i) a decrease of $90.2 in proceeds from sale of assets during the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to the same
period of 2021, (ii) a net increase of $63.1 million in time deposits during the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to a net decrease
of $10.7 million during the same period of 2021 and (iii) an increase of $74.0 million in payments for vessel acquisitions, advances
for vessels under construction and major improvements during the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to the same period of 2021.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
Net cash flows used in financing activities were $40.1
million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared $225.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. This decrease in cash flows
used in financing activities of $185.8 million, compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, is mainly attributable to a decrease of
$243.4 million in long term debt principal payments, a decrease in payments of common stock offering expenses of $0.4 million and an
increase in proceeds from long-term debt by $80.8 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, offset by an increase of $19.6
in redemption of preferred stock, an increase of $12.2 in finance lease payments, an increase of $4.0 million in the payment of deferred
financing costs, an increase in repurchases of common stock by $9.1 million, a decrease of $71.5 in proceeds from issuance of common
stock and an increase of $22.4 in dividend payments compared to the year ended December 31, 2021.
The discussion relating to the cash flows for the year
ended December 31, 2021 compared to year ended December 31, 2020, can be found in the Company’s 20-F for the year ended December
31, 2021 filed with the SEC on March 30, 2022, under ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS - B. Liquidity and Capital
Resources.
Credit Facilities
We operate in a capital intensive
industry which requires significant amounts of investment, and we fund a portion of this investment through long-term debt. We or
our subsidiaries have generally entered into financing arrangements in order to finance the acquisition of our vessels, to refinance
existing indebtedness and for general corporate purposes. In 2022, (a) a subsidiary of ours consummated a sale and lease back
transaction for a newbuild vessel that was delivered to it, whereby the vessel was sold to a third party and immediately leased back
to us under a bareboat charter for ten years with a purchase obligation at the end of the bareboat period and with purchase options
at predetermined dates and prices during the period of the bareboat charter. The proceeds from the transaction were used to finance
the delivery installment of the vessel and for general corporate purposes. In view of the purchase obligation at the end of the
bareboat charter, we have assessed that the transaction be a financing transaction, (b) one our subsidiaries entered into a sale and
lease back transaction for one of our vessels, whereby the vessel was sold to a third party and immediately leased back to us under
bareboat charter for five years, with a purchase obligation at the end of the bareboat period and with purchase options at
predetermined dates and prices during the period of the bareboat charter. The proceeds from the transaction were used to finance the
delivery installment of the vessel and for general corporate purposes. In view of the purchase obligation at the end of the bareboat
charter, we have assessed that the transaction be a financing transaction, (c) two of our subsidiaries entered into respective
credit facilities that will be consummated upon delivery of the newbuild vessels to the respective subsidiaries, and that will be
used to finance the delivery installment of the vessels and for general corporate purposes, (d) seven of our subsidiaries entered
into a credit facility which was used to refinance loan facilities secured by eight vessels, seven of which secure the new credit
facility, the proceeds of which were used to refinance three credit facilities with the same financial institution, and (e) four of
our subsidiaries entered into an amendment regarding the credit facility that they are party to, whereby the maturity of the
facility was extended by four years and the repayment schedule was amended accordingly.
The term of our 18 financing arrangements outstanding as
of December 31, 2022, ranged from five to 10 years. They are repaid by monthly or, quarterly principal installments and a balloon payment
due on maturity. We generally pay interest at LIBOR or SOFR plus a margin, except for one facility which is deemed to bear interest at
a fixed rate, and five facilities, where a portion of the principal amounts is deemed to bear interest at a fixed rate.
The obligations under our financing arrangements are secured
by, among other types of security, first priority mortgages over the vessels owned by the respective borrower subsidiaries, first priority
assignments of all insurances and earnings of the mortgaged vessels or ownership of the vessels under sale and leaseback financing and
guarantees by us.
Covenants Under Credit Facilities
The credit facilities impose operating and financial restrictions
on us. These restrictions in our existing credit facilities generally limit our subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things, and
subject to exceptions set forth in such credit facilities:
|
~ |
pay dividends if an event of default has occurred and is continuing or would
occur as a result of the payment of such dividends; |
|
~ |
enter into certain long-term charters without the lenders’ consent; |
|
~ |
incur additional indebtedness, including through the issuance of guarantees; |
|
~ |
change the flag, class or management of the vessel mortgaged under such facility or terminate or
materially amend the management agreement relating to such vessel; |
|
~ |
create liens on their assets; |
|
~ |
make loans; |
|
~ |
make investments; |
|
~ |
make capital expenditures; |
|
~ |
undergo a change in ownership or control or permit a change in ownership and control of our Managers;
|
|
~ |
sell the vessel mortgaged under such facility; and |
|
~ |
change our chief executive officer. |
Our credit facilities also require certain of our subsidiaries
to maintain financial ratios and satisfy financial covenants. Depending on the credit facility, certain of our subsidiaries are subject
to financial ratios and covenants requiring that these subsidiaries:
|
~ |
meet the Minimum Value Covenant of 112%, 115%, 120% or 135%, as the case may
be, for credit facilities outstanding; |
|
~ |
maintain a minimum cash balance per vessel with the respective lender from $200,000 to $500,000
as the case may be; and |
|
~ |
ensure that we comply with certain financial covenants under the guarantees described below. |
In addition, under guarantees we have entered
into with respect to certain of our subsidiaries’ existing credit facilities, we are subject to financial covenants. Depending
on the facility, these financial covenants include the following:
|
~ |
under the Consolidated Leverage Covenant, our total consolidated liabilities
divided by our total consolidated assets (based on the market value of all vessels owned or leased on a finance lease taking into
account their employment, and the book value of all other assets) must not exceed 85%; |
|
~ |
under the Net Worth Covenant, our total consolidated assets (based on the market value of all vessels
owned or leased on a finance lease taking into account their employment, and the book value of all other assets) less our total consolidated
liabilities must not be less than $150 million; |
|
~ |
under the EBITDA Covenant, the ratio of our EBITDA over consolidated interest expense must not be
less than 2.0:1, on a trailing 12 months’ basis; |
|
~ |
under the Control Covenant, a minimum of 30% or 35%, as the case may be, of our shares shall remain
directly or indirectly beneficially owned by the Hajioannou family for the duration of the relevant credit facilities and, in the
case of one facility, Polys Hajioannou, is required to beneficially hold a minimum of 20% of the voting and ownership rights; and
|
|
~ |
payment of dividends is subject to no event of default having occurred and be continuing or would
occur as a result of the payment of such dividends. |
The Minimum Value Covenant, Consolidated Leverage Covenant,
EBITDA Covenant, Net Worth Covenant and Control Covenant do not apply to the Pinewood, Shikokuepta, Agros and Kyotofriendo One financing
agreements. The EBITDA Covenant does not apply to the Shikokuokto, Gloversix, Pentakomo and Maxdekatria financing agreements and to the
Monagrouli loan facility. The Minimum Value Covenant does not apply to the Maxdeka, Shikoku, Shikokutessera, Glovertwo and Maxtessera
financing agreements.
As of December 31, 2022, the Company was in compliance
with all debt covenants that were in effect with respect to its loan and credit facilities.
Bond
The Bond is not secured by any of our vessels or any other
assets, is guaranteed by us and pays a coupon of 2.95% on a semi-annual basis. It matures in February 2027, has no principal payments
during its tenor and may be redeemed at our option in part or in full after February 2024, subject to the payment of a premium ranging
from 1.5% to 0.5% of the redeemed amount depending on the timing of the redemption.
Covenants Under the Bond
Under the Bond, we are subject to financial covenants,
including the following:
|
~ |
under the Consolidated Leverage Covenant, our total consolidated liabilities
divided by our total consolidated assets (based on the market value of all vessels owned or leased on a finance lease taking into
account their employment, and the book value of all other assets) must not exceed 85%; |
|
~ |
under the Net Worth Covenant, our total consolidated assets (based on the market value of all vessels
owned or leased on a finance lease taking into account their employment, and the book value of all other assets) less our total consolidated
liabilities must not be less than $150 million; |
|
~ |
under the EBITDA Covenant, the ratio of our EBITDA over consolidated net interest expense must not
be less than 2.0:1, on a trailing 12 months’ basis; |
|
~ |
payment of dividends is subject to no event of default having occurred and be continuing or would
occur as a result of the payment of such dividends; |
|
~ |
a minimum of 30% of its voting and ownership rights shall remain directly or indirectly beneficially
owned by the Hajioannou family for the duration of the Bond. |
As of December 31, 2022, the Company was in compliance
with all covenants that were in effect with respect to the bond.
During 2022, we received proceeds of $259.6 million under
our credit and financing facilities and we repaid $191.3 million of our indebtedness. As of December 31, 2022, we had 18 outstanding
financing arrangements and the Bond with a combined outstanding balance of $422.6 million. These debt facilities had maturity dates between
2023 and 2032. During 2023, we are scheduled to repay $45.7 million of our long-term debt outstanding as of December 31, 2022. For a
description of our debt facilities as of December 31, 2022, please see Note 8 of the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere
in this annual report.
C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses |
|
We have not incurred expenditures relating to research
and development, patents or licenses for the last three years.
Our results of operations depend primarily on the
charter hire rates that we are able to realize, and the demand for drybulk vessel services. During 2017, the BDI experienced significant
volatility, reaching an annual low of 685 in February 2017 and an annual high of 1,743 in December 2017. During 2018, the BDI remained
volatile, reaching an annual low of 948 in April 2018 and an annual high of 1,774 in July 2018. During 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022, the
BDI, remained volatile, reaching an annual low of 595 on February 11, 2019 and a high of 2,518 on September 4, 2019 for 2019, an annual
low of 393 on May 14, 2020 and an annual high of 2,097 on October 6, 2020 for 2020, an annual low of 1,303 on February 10, 2021 and an
annual high of 5,650 on October 7, 2021, an annual low of 965 on August 31, 2022 and an annual high of 3,369 on May 23, 2022, and a low
of 530 on February 16, 2023 and a high of 1,250 on January 3, 2023, thus far in 2023.
Global growth is projected to fall from an estimated 3.4%
in 2022 to 2.9% in 2023, as forecasted in the January 2023 World Economic Outlook of the International Monetary Fund. The rise in central
bank rates to fight inflation and Russia’s war in Ukraine continue to weigh on economic activity. The rapid spread of Covid-19
in China dampened growth in 2022, but the recent reopening has paved the way for a faster-than-expected recovery. Global inflation is
expected to fall from 8.8% in 2022 to 6.6% in 2023 and 4.3% in 2024, as forecasted in the January 2023 World Economic Outlook of the
International Monetary Fund. As of February 24, 2023, the BDI was 883. During the first quarter of 2023, the BDI has decreased considerably,
as a result of the continuing effects of the Russia-Ukraine war, and the Chinese New Year, where in the past a seasonal low charter market
has been observed.
The charter rates during the first months of 2023 in the
drybulk market reflect in part the fact that the decrease in demand for drybulk vessel services influenced by global financial conditions
which remain volatile, as a result of the Russia -Ukraine war during 2022. On the upside, a stronger boost from pent-up demand in numerous
economies or a faster fall in inflation are plausible, with positive cross-border dry bulk market spillovers. On the downside, severe
health outcomes in China could hold back the recovery, Russia’s war in Ukraine could escalate, and tighter global financing costs
could worsen debt distress, which could affect negatively the dry bulk market. Financial markets could also suddenly reprice in response
to adverse inflation news, while further geopolitical fragmentation could hamper economic progress. See also “Item 3. Key Information—D.
Risks Inherent in Our Industry and Our Business—The international drybulk shipping industry is cyclical and volatile, having reached
historical highs in 2008 and historical lows in 2016. Charter rates improved in 2019 and declined significantly in 2020, due in part
to the impact of Covid-19, which resulted in relatively lower charter rates. Charter rates since significantly improved during 2021 and
2022. Cyclicality and volatility may lead to reductions in the charter rates we are able to obtain, in vessel values and in our earnings,
results of operations and available cash flow.”
As of February 24, 2023, 24 of our 44 vessels are employed or scheduled to
be employed in period time charters with outstanding duration of more than three months, eight of which include daily charter rates linked
to the BDI. Additionally, we believe we have structured our capital expenditure requirements, debt commitments and liquidity resources
in a way that will provide us with financial flexibility (see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects - B. Liquidity
and Capital Resources” for more information).
Our TCE rate for the periods ended December 31, 2020, 2021
and 2022 was $10,559, $21,752 and $22,712 respectively, as a result of our increasing exposure to prevailing spot market conditions.
During 2022, Viterra B.V. (ex.Glencore Agriculture B.V.)
accounted for 15.81% and Cargill International S.A. accounted
for 17.71% of our revenues.
During 2022, 10.0% of our revenue was derived from five
Capesize class vessels with long period time charters, contracted in previous years with original durations of three to 20 years and
with a weighted average TCE rate of $24,948. The remaining 90.0% of our revenue was derived from the employment of our remaining vessels,
under spot and period time charters with original durations up to 5 years with a TCE rate of $22,487.
During 2021, 7.1% of our revenue was derived from two vessels
with long period time charters, contracted in previous years with original durations of 10 to 20 years and with a weighted average TCE
rate of $31,833. The remaining 92.9% of our revenue was derived from the employment of our remaining vessels, under voyage, spot and
period time charters with original durations up to 5 years with a TCE rate of $21,161.
As of February 24, 2023, we had a total of 44 vessels
in our fleet. As of February 24, 2023, we have contracted 49% of our expected ownership days for the remainder of 2023. Our contracted
TCE rate for the remainder of 2023, calculated on the basis of all existing contracts, including contracted revenue linked to the BPI
and BCI index calculated as of February 24, 2023, and customary assumptions in relation to voyage expenses, as of February 24,
2023, was $14,149.
Our employment profile as of February 24, 2023, included
one period time charter contract, contracted in previous years with original duration of 20 years, with an average expected remaining
charter duration of 8.7 years and with an expected TCE rate for the remainder of 2023 of $25,059, six period time charter contracts contracted
in previous years with original durations of 5 years, with an average expected remaining charter duration of 2.5 years and with an expected
TCE rate for the remainder of 2023 of $8,782, four period time charter contracts contracted in 2021 and 2022 with original durations
of three years, with an average expected remaining charter duration of 2.7 years and with an expected TCE rate for the remainder of 2023
of $23,245 and 33 spot and period time charters with an expected average remaining charter duration of 3.3 months, and an expected TCE
rate of $12,784. Vessels whose charters expire or are early redelivered or terminated within 2023 will be chartered at prevailing charter
market conditions, which may substantially influence our revenues, the valuation of our vessels, our results of operations and our dividend
distributions.
E. Critical Accounting Estimates |
|
Critical accounting estimates are those estimates made
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles that involve a significant level of estimation uncertainty and have had or
are reasonably likely to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations of the registrant.
We prepared our consolidated financial statements in accordance
with U.S. GAAP, which requires us to make estimates in the application of our accounting policies based on our best assumptions, judgments
and opinions. We base these estimates on the information currently available to us and on various other assumptions we believe are reasonable
under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Following is a discussion
of the accounting policies that involve a high degree of judgment and the methods of their application. For a further description of
our material accounting policies, please read Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
Impairment of Long Lived Assets
The Company’s long lived assets comprise its owned
vessels as well as vessels under finance leases.
The Company reviews for impairment its long lived assets
held and used whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. When
the estimate of undiscounted cash flows, excluding interest charges, expected to be generated by the use of our long lived asset is less
than its carrying amount, we are required to evaluate the long lived asset for an impairment loss. Measurement of the impairment loss
is based on the fair value of the long lived asset.
The carrying values of our long lived assets may not represent
their fair market value at any point in time since the market prices of second-hand vessels tend to fluctuate with changes in charter
rates and the cost of newbuilds. Historically, both charter rates and vessel values tend to be cyclical. Declines in the fair market
value of vessels, prevailing market charter rates, vessel sale and purchase considerations, regulatory changes in drybulk shipping industry,
changes in business plans or changes in overall market conditions that may adversely affect cash flows are considered as potential impairment
indicators. In the event the independent fair market value of a vessel is lower than its carrying value, we determine undiscounted projected
net operating cash flow for such vessel and compare it to the vessel carrying value.
The undiscounted projected net operating cash flows for
each vessel are determined by considering the charter revenues from existing time charters for the fixed vessel days and an
estimated daily time charter equivalent for the unfixed days, using the twelve month budgeted rates for the unchartered period of
the first twelve months, the Forward Freight Agreement (“FFA”) rates for the unchartered period of the second twelve
months and the most recent historical 10-year average daily rates of similar size vessels thereafter, until the end of the remaining
estimated useful life of the asset, adding an estimated premium on future daily charter rates for vessels with installed Scrubbers
based on an estimated price difference between the bunker fuel types, until the end of the remaining useful life of the asset, net
of brokerage commissions; expected outflows for vessel operating expenses which include drydocking costs, voyage expenses and
management fees. The undiscounted cash flows incorporate various factors, such as estimated future charter rates, estimated vessel
operating costs, estimated vessel utilization rates, estimated remaining lives of the vessels (assumed to be 25 years from the
initial delivery of each vessel from the shipyard) and estimated salvage value of the vessels based on period end ten-year
historical average demolition prices per light-weight ton. In addition, the undiscounted cash flow estimates incorporate a
probability weighted approach for developing estimates of future cash flows for specific vessels when alternative courses of action,
including the likelihood of sale, are under consideration.
Historically, a full shipping cycle has variable duration.
Since 2008, when we identified impairment indications for the first time, we have used the ten-year average of the one-year time charter
rate for the computation of an estimated daily time charter rate for the unfixed days for each of our vessel types. We use the historical
ten-year average, as we believe it captures on average the highs and lows of a full shipping cycle, and therefore, is considered a reasonable
estimation of expected future time charter rates over the remaining useful life of our vessels.
These assumptions are based on historical trends as well
as future expectations. Although management believes that the assumptions used to evaluate potential impairment are reasonable and appropriate,
such assumptions are highly subjective.
Our impairment test as of December 31, 2022, on our vessels,
which also involved sensitivity tests on the future time charter rates, (which is the input that is most sensitive to variations), allowing
for variances of up to 7.6%, depending on the vessel type on time charter rates from our base scenario, indicated no impairment on any
of our vessels. As of February 24, 2023, our contracted TCE rate for the remainder of 2023, calculated on the basis of all existing
contracts and customary assumptions in relation to voyage expenses, was $14,149, as compared to the TCE for 2020, 2021 and 2022 of $10,559,
21,752, and $22,712, respectively. The ten-year average historic rate we have used is lower than the 3, 5 and 15 year historical averages.
Our analysis for the year ended December 31, 2021, on our
vessels held and used, which also involved sensitivity tests on the future time charter rates, (which is the input that is most sensitive
to variations), allowing for variances of up to 16.2%, with the exception of one vessel allowing for variances of up to 1.4%, depending
on the vessel type on time charter rates from our base scenario, indicated no impairment on any of our vessels that were held and used.
Our comparison of the actual 2022 net receipts to the forecast
net receipts used in the impairment test performed for the year ended December 31, 2021 indicated a favorable variance of 6.6%, between
actual net receipts during 2022 and net receipts forecast by the Company for the same period. Our comparison of the actual 2021 net receipts
to the forecast net receipts used in the impairment test performed for the year ended December 31, 2020 indicated a favorable variance
of 139.0%, between actual net receipts during 2021 and net receipts forecast by the Company for the same period, due to improvements
in the dry bulk market rates during 2021, which were not anticipated.
To assist investors in evaluating the possible impact on
future results of operations, the following table shows the effect on the Company’s impairment analysis of using the 3-year, 5-year
and 15-year historical average daily rates as of December 31, 2022, as opposed to using the 10-year historical average daily rates.
|
|
|
10-Year |
|
|
3-Year |
|
|
Impairment
Charge |
|
|
5-Year |
|
|
Impairment
Charge |
|
|
15-Year |
|
Impairment
Charge |
|
|
|
|
Historical
Average
Daily Rates |
|
|
Historical
Average
Daily Rates |
|
|
(in USD
million) |
|
|
Historical
Average
Daily Rates |
|
|
(in USD
million) |
|
|
Historical
Average
Daily Rates |
|
(in USD
million) |
|
Panamax Class Vessels |
|
$ |
12,431 |
|
$ |
17,616 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
15,551 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
16,479 |
|
— |
|
Kamsarmax Class Vessels |
|
$ |
13,177 |
|
$ |
18,673 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
16,484 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
17,467 |
|
— |
|
Post Panamax Class Vessels |
|
$ |
13,923 |
|
$ |
19,730 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
17,417 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
18,456 |
|
— |
|
Capesize Class Vessels |
|
$ |
16,124 |
|
$ |
19,295 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
18,477 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
24,651 |
|
— |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
The Company assesses the assumptions used for performing
its impairment analysis, and considers the appropriate duration of historical average charter rates to be used.
While the Company intends to
continue to hold and operate its vessels as of December 31, 2022, to assist investors in evaluating the possible impact on future
results of operations, the following table shows the number of vessels whose estimated basic market value, exceeded their carrying
value and their aggregate carrying value in each case, as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2022, respectively. For purposes of
this calculation, we have assumed that the vessels would be sold at a price that reflects our estimate of their current basic market
values. Our estimate of basic market values is determined based on valuations received from third-party independent ship brokers,
approved by our banks, who determine the fair value based on recent vessel sales and purchase activity which take into account
relevant sales and negotiations in progress, newbuilding prices, demolition prices, rates and trends in relevant sectors, vessel
specifications and yards. The carrying value of each of our vessel’s does not necessarily represent its fair market value or
the amount that could be obtained if the vessel was sold. The Company’s estimates of basic market values assume that the
vessels are all in good and seaworthy condition without need for repair and, if inspected, would be certified as being in class
without recommendations of any kind. In addition, because vessel market values are highly volatile, these estimates may not be
indicative of either the current or future prices that the Company could achieve if it were to sell any of the vessels. The Company
would not record impairment for any of its vessels for which the fair market value is below its carrying value unless and until the
Company either determines to sell the vessel for a loss or determines that the vessel’s carrying value is not recoverable.
|
|
As of December 31, 2021 |
|
As of December 31, 2022 |
|
|
Number of
vessels |
|
|
|
Aggregate
Carrying
Value
($ US Million) |
|
Number of
vessels |
|
|
|
Aggregate
Carrying
Value
($ US Million) |
Vessels whose fair market value
was below their carrying value |
|
6 |
|
(1) |
|
202.7 |
|
10 |
|
(2) |
|
320.6 |
Vessels whose fair market value,
exceeded their carrying value |
|
32 |
|
|
|
661.7 |
|
33 |
|
|
|
680.5 |
Total Vessels |
|
38 |
|
|
|
864.4 |
|
43 |
|
|
|
1,001.1 |
Right-of-use asset whose fair market value
was below its carrying value |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
Right-of-use asset whose fair market value,
exceeded its carrying value |
|
1 |
|
|
|
31.9 |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
Total Right-of-use asset |
|
1 |
|
|
|
31.9 |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
Total |
|
39 |
|
|
|
896.3 |
|
43 |
|
|
|
1,001.1 |
(1) |
As of December 31, 2021, the aggregate carrying
value of these 6 vessels was $42.4 million more than their fair market value, based on broker quotes. |
(2) |
As of December 31, 2022, the aggregate carrying value of these
10 vessels was $56.4 million more than their fair market value, based on broker quotes. |
The increase of $14.0 million in
the difference between the fair market value and the aggregate carrying value of the vessels whose fair market value was below their carrying
value as of December 31, 2022, as compared to December 31, 2021, reflects the seasonality of the drybulk trade, the effect of the then
forthcoming Chinese new year and declining effects of Covid-19.
Recent accounting pronouncements
Refer to Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this annual report.
ITEM 6.
DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES |
|
A.
Directors and Senior Management |
The following table sets forth,
as of February 24, 2023, information regarding our directors and executive officers.
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position |
Polys Hajioannou |
|
56 |
|
Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board
and Class I Director |
Dr. Loukas Barmparis |
|
60 |
|
President, Secretary and Class II Director |
Konstantinos Adamopoulos |
|
60 |
|
Chief Financial Officer and Class III Director |
Ioannis Foteinos |
|
64 |
|
Chief Operating Officer and Class I Director |
Christos Megalou |
|
63 |
|
Class II Director |
Frank Sica |
|
72 |
|
Class III Director |
Ole Wikborg |
|
67 |
|
Class I Director |
Certain biographical information
about each of these individuals is set forth below. The term of our Class I directors expires in 2024, the term of our Class II directors
expires in 2025 and the term of our Class III directors expires in 2023.
Polys Hajioannou is our Chief Executive
Officer and has been Chairman of our board of directors since 2008. Mr. Hajioannou also serves with Safe Bulkers Management Ltd. in Cyprus,
which provides technical, commercial and administrative management services to the Company, and prior to that, with its predecessor Alassia
Steamship Co., Ltd., which he joined in 1987. Mr. Hajioannou was elected as a member of the board of directors of the Union of Greek
Shipowners in 2006 and served on the board until February 2009. Mr. Hajioannou is a founding member and Vice-President of the Union of
Cyprus Shipowners. Mr. Hajioannou is a member of the Lloyd’s Register Hellenic Advisory Committee. In 2011, Mr. Hajioannou was appointed
to the board of directors of the Hellenic Mutual War Risks Association (Bermuda) Limited and in 2013 he was elected to the board of directors
of the UK
Mutual Steam Ship Assurance Association
(Bermuda) Limited where he served until 2016. In that year, he was elected member to the newly established UK Club Bermuda Members’
Committee. Mr. Hajioannou holds a Bachelor of Science degree in nautical studies from Sunderland University.
Dr. Loukas Barmparis is our President
and Secretary and has been a member of our board of directors since 2008. Dr. Barmparis also serves as the technical manager of Safe Bulkers
Management Ltd., which he joined in December 2016. Between 2009 and 2016, he was the technical manager of Safety Management Overseas
S.A. Until 2009, he was the project development manager of the affiliated Alassia Development S.A., responsible for renewable energy projects.
Prior to joining our Manager and Alassia Development S.A., from 1999 to 2005 and from 1993 to 1995, Dr. Barmparis was employed at N. Daskalantonakis
Group, Grecotel, one of the largest hotel chains in Greece, as technical manager and project development general manager. During the interim
period between 1995 and 1999, Dr. Barmparis was employed at Exergia S.A. as an energy consultant. Dr. Barmparis holds a master of business
administration (“M.B.A.”) from the Athens Laboratory of Business Administration, a doctorate from the Imperial College of
Science Technology and Medicine, a master of applied science from the University of Toronto and a diploma in mechanical engineering from
the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
Konstantinos Adamopoulos is our
Chief Financial Officer and has been a member of our board of directors since 2008. Mr. Adamopoulos also serves as the finance manager
of Safe Bulkers Management Ltd., which he joined in December 2016. Prior to joining us, Mr. Adamopoulos was employed at Credit Agricole
CIB, a financial institution, as a senior relationship manager in shipping finance for 14 years. Prior to this, from 1990 to 1993, Mr.
Adamopoulos was employed by the National Bank of Greece in London as an account officer for shipping finance and in Athens as deputy head
of the export finance department. Prior to this, from 1987 to 1989, Mr. Adamopoulos served as a finance officer in the Greek Air Force.
Mr. Adamopoulos holds a Bachelor of Science degree in business administration from the Athens School of Economics and Business Science
and an M.B.A. in finance from the Bayes Business School, City, University of London.
Ioannis Foteinos is our Chief Operating
Officer and has been a member of our board of directors since February 2009. Mr. Foteinos has over 30 years of experience in the shipping
industry. After obtaining a bachelor’s degree in nautical studies from Sunderland University, he joined the predecessor of Safety
Management in 1987, where he served as Chartering Manager until 2017. Presently he serves as Chartering Manager with Safe Bulkers Management
Ltd. in Cyprus, which he joined in May 2017.
Christos Megalou has been a member
of our board of directors since 2016 and serves as a member of our audit and our corporate governance, nominating and compensation committee.
Mr. Megalou has been the Chief Executive Officer of Piraeus Bank SA since 2017. Mr. Megalou has been a Distinguished Fellow of the Global
Federation of Competitiveness Councils in Washington, D.C. since 2016. From 2015 to 2016, Mr. Megalou served as senior advisor to Fairfax
Financial Holdings. From 2013 to 2015, Mr. Megalou served as the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Executive Board of Eurobank
Ergasias SA and was the Deputy Chairman of the Hellenic Bank Association in Greece. From 2010 to 2013, Mr. Megalou served as Chairman
of the Hellenic Bankers Association in the U.K. From 1997 to 2013, he was Vice-Chairman of Southern Europe, Co-head of Investment Banking
for Southern Europe and Managing Director in the Investment Banking Division of Credit Suisse in London. From 1991 to 1997, he was a Director
at Barclays de Zoete Wedd. From 1991 to 1996, he was Deputy Chairman of the British Hellenic Chamber of Commerce. He started his career
in 1984 as an auditor in Arthur Andersen in Athens. Mr. Megalou holds a Bachelor of Science degree in economics from the University of
Athens and an M.B.A. in finance from Aston University in Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Frank Sica has been a member of
our board of directors and of our corporate governance, nominating and compensation committee, and a member and chairman of our audit
committee, since 2008. Mr. Sica is also director of CSG Systems International, an account management and billing software company for
communication industries. Previously, Mr. Sica has served as a director of JetBlue Airways Corporation, a commercial airline, and Kohl’s
Corporation, an owner and operator of department stores. Mr. Sica has served as a Partner at Tailwind Capital, a private equity firm,
since 2006. From 2004 to 2005, Mr. Sica was a Senior Advisor to Soros Private Funds Management. From 1998 to 2003, Mr. Sica worked at
Soros Fund Management where he oversaw the direct real estate and private equity investment activities of Soros. From 1988 to 1998, Mr.
Sica was a Managing Director at Morgan Stanley. Mr. Sica holds a bachelor’s degree from Wesleyan University and an M.B.A. from the
Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College.
Ole Wikborg has been a member of
our board of directors and of our audit committee and chairman and member of our corporate governance, nominating and compensation committee
since 2008. Mr. Wikborg has been involved in the marine and shipping industry in various capacities for over 35 years. From 2002 to 2016,
Mr. Wikborg has served as a member of the management team, a director and a senior underwriter of the Norwegian Hull Club, based in Oslo,
Norway. In 2016, he moved to London to take up the position as the head of the London branch of Norwegian Hull Club, established that
year. He retired from his position in Norwegian Hull Club in October 2022. From 2002 to 2006, Mr. Wikborg also served as a member and
chairman of the Ocean Hull Committee of the International Union of Marine Insurance (“IUMI”). Since 2006, he has served as
Vice President and a member of the Executive Board of the IUMI, and he was elected as President of IUMI from 2010 to 2014. Since 1997,
Mr. Wikborg has served as a board member of the Central Union of Marine Insurers, based in Oslo, and was that organization’s Chairman
from 2009 to 2013. From 1997 until 2002, Mr. Wikborg served as the senior vice president and manager of the marine and energy division
of the Zurich Protector Insurance Company ASA. Prior to his career in marine insurance, Mr. Wikborg served in the Royal Norwegian Navy,
attaining the rank of lieutenant commander.
B. Compensation of Directors and Senior Management |
Our Managers, pursuant to the terms
of the applicable Management Agreements, have historically provided to us our executive officers. For the year ended December 31, 2022,
none of the executive officers and senior management were employed directly by
us. For a discussion of the fees payable to our Managers, refer to “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Management
Agreements.” Also, we do not have any service contracts with any of our non-executive directors that provide for benefits upon termination
of their services.
Non-executive independent directors
of the Company are paid an annual fee in the amount of $40,000 plus reimbursement for their out-of-pocket expenses.
In addition, the chairman of the
audit committee, Frank Sica, receives the annual equivalent of $60,000 in the form of shares of our Common Stock. Ole Wikborg and Christos
Megalou receive the annual equivalent of $30,000 in the form of shares of our Common Stock.
No amounts are set aside or accrued
by us to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits.
Information regarding the period
which each director served and the date of expiration of each director’s current term is included in “Item 6A. Directors,
Senior Management and Employees—A. Directors and Senior Management.” As of December 31, 2022, we had seven members on our
board of directors. The board of directors may change the number of directors to not less than three, nor more than 15, by a vote of a
majority of the entire board. Each director shall be elected to serve until the third succeeding annual meeting of shareholders and until
his or her successor shall have been duly elected and qualified, except in the event of death, resignation or removal. A vacancy on the
board created by death, resignation, removal (which may only be for cause), or failure of the shareholders to elect the entire class of
directors to be elected at any election of directors or for any other reason, may be filled only by an affirmative vote of a majority
of the remaining directors then in office, even if less than a quorum, at any special meeting called for that purpose or at any regular
meeting of the board of directors. None of our directors is a party to service contracts with us providing for benefits upon termination
of employment.
During the fiscal year ended December
31, 2022, the full board of directors held four meetings. Each director attended all of the meetings of committees of which the director
was a member in person or electronically. Our board of directors has determined that each of Messrs. Sica, Megalou and Wikborg are independent
within the current meanings of independence employed by the corporate governance rules of the NYSE and the SEC. shareholders who wish
to send communications on any topic to the board of directors or to the independent directors as a group, or to the chairman of the audit
committee, Mr. Frank Sica, or to the chairman of the corporate governance, nominating and compensation committee, Mr. Ole Wikborg, may
do so by writing to our Secretary, Dr. Loukas Barmparis, Safe Bulkers, Inc., e-mail: directors@safebulkers.com.
Corporate Governance
The board of directors and our Company’s
management have engaged in an ongoing review of our corporate governance practices in order to oversee our compliance with the applicable
corporate governance rules of the NYSE and the SEC.
We have adopted a number of key
documents that are the foundation of the Company’s corporate governance, including:
|
~ |
a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for all officers and employees, which incorporates
a Code of Ethics for directors and a Code of Conduct for corporate officers; |
|
~ |
a Corporate Governance, Nominating and Compensation Committee Charter; and |
|
~ |
an Audit Committee Charter. |
These documents and other important
information on our governance are posted on our website and may be viewed at http://www.safebulkers.com. We will also provide a paper
copy of any of these documents upon the written request of a stockholder. shareholders may direct their requests to the attention of our
Secretary, Dr. Loukas Barmparis, Safe Bulkers, Inc., e-mail: directors@safebulkers.com. Our website, and the information contained on,
or hyperlinked from, our website are not part of this Annual Report, other than the documents that we file with the SEC that are expressly
incorporated herein or therein by reference.
Committees of the Board of Directors
Audit Committee
Our audit committee consists of
Ole Wikborg, Christos Megalou and Frank Sica, as chairman. Our board of directors has determined that Frank Sica qualifies as an audit
committee “financial expert,” as such term is defined in Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC. The audit committee is responsible
for:
|
~ |
the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of independent auditors and approving any
non-audit services performed by such auditor; |
|
~ |
assisting the board in monitoring the integrity of our financial statements, the independent auditors’
qualifications and independence, the performance of the independent accountants and our internal audit function and our compliance
with legal and regulatory requirements; |
|
~ |
discussing the annual audited financial and quarterly statements with management and the independent
auditors; |
|
~ |
discussing earnings press releases, as well as financial information and earnings guidance provided
to analysts and rating agencies; |
|
~ |
discussing policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management; |
|
~ |
meeting separately, and periodically, with management, internal auditors and the independent auditor; |
|
~ |
reviewing with the independent auditor any audit problems or difficulties and management’s
responses; |
|
~ |
setting clear hiring policies for employees or former employees of the independent auditors; |
|
~ |
annually reviewing the adequacy of the audit committee’s written charter, the internal audit
charter, the scope of the annual internal audit plan and the results of internal audits; |
|
~ |
reporting regularly to the full board of directors; and |
|
~ |
handling such other matters that are specifically delegated to the audit committee by the board
of directors from time to time. |
Corporate Governance, Nominating
and Compensation Committee
Our corporate governance, nominating
and compensation committee consists of Christos Megalou, Frank Sica and Ole Wikborg, as chairman. The corporate governance, nominating
and compensation committee is responsible for:
|
~ |
nominating candidates, consistent with criteria approved by the full board of directors, for the
approval of the full board of directors to fill board vacancies as and when they arise, as well as putting in place plans for succession,
in particular, of the chairman of the board of directors and executive officers; |
|
~ |
selecting, or recommending that the full board of directors select, the director nominees for the
next annual meeting of shareholders; |
|
~ |
determining or administering our long-term incentive plans, including any equity based plans and
grants under such plans; |
|
~ |
developing and recommending to the full board of directors corporate governance guidelines applicable
to us and keeping such guidelines under review; |
|
~ |
overseeing the evaluation of the board and management; |
|
~ |
reviewing regularly the board structure, size and composition, taking into account the importance
of a diverse composite mix of ethnicities, ages, gender, race, geographic locations, education and professional skills, backgrounds
and experience, among other characteristics; |
|
~ |
maintaining a commitment to supporting, valuing and leveraging diversity in the composition of the
Board among other qualities that the board believes serve the best interest of the Company and its shareholders; and |
|
~ |
handling such other matters that are specifically delegated to the corporate governance, nominating
and compensation committee by the board of directors from time to time. |
D. Employees
Our executive officers are provided
by our Managers. As of December 31, 2022, our Managers employed approximately 914 people serving on board the vessels in our fleet, and
approximately 156 people on shore.
E. Share Ownership
The Common Stock and Preferred Shares
beneficially owned by our directors and executive officers and/or companies affiliated with these individuals is included in “Item
7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—A. Major Shareholders” below.
Equity Compensation Plans
We have agreed to provide the chairman
of the audit committee, Mr. Frank Sica, as part of his remuneration, the annual equivalent of $60,000 in the form of shares of our Common
Stock, and our non-executive independent directors, Mr. Ole Wikborg and Mr. Christos Megalou, as part of their remuneration, the annual
equivalent of $30,000 each, in the form of shares of our Common Stock.
ITEM 7.
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
A. Major Shareholders
The following table sets forth certain
information regarding the beneficial ownership of our outstanding Common Stock and Preferred Shares as of February 24, 2023 held
by:
|
~ |
each person or entity that we know beneficially owns 5.0% or more of our Common Stock; |
|
~ |
our officers and directors; and |
|
~ |
all our directors and officers as a group. |
Beneficial ownership is determined
in accordance with the rules of the SEC. In general, a person who has voting power or investment power with respect to securities is treated
as a beneficial owner of those securities.
Beneficial ownership does not necessarily
imply that the named person has the economic or other benefits of ownership. For purposes of this table, shares subject to options, warrants
or rights or shares exercisable within 60 days of February 24, 2023 are considered as beneficially owned by the person holding those
options, warrants or rights. Each stockholder is entitled to one vote for each share held. The applicable percentage of ownership for
each stockholder is based on 118,878,626 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of February 24, 2023. Information for certain holders
is based on their latest filings with the SEC or
information delivered to us. Except
as noted below, the address of all shareholders, officers and directors identified in the table and the accompanying footnotes below is
in care of our principal executive offices.
Identity of Person or
Group |
Number of
Shares of
Common
Stock
Owned |
|
Percentage
of Common
Stock |
|
Number of
Shares of
Series C
Preferred
Shares |
Percentage
of Series C
Preferred
Shares |
Number of
Shares of
Series D
Preferred
Shares |
Percentage
of
Series D
Preferred
Shares |
5% Beneficial Owners: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vorini Holdings Inc.(1) |
19,426,015 |
|
16.34% |
|
— |
—% |
— |
—% |
Bellapais Maritime Inc.(1) |
5,000,000 |
|
4.21% |
|
— |
—% |
— |
—% |
Kyperounta Maritime Inc.(1) |
5,000,000 |
|
4.21% |
|
— |
—% |
— |
—% |
Lefkoniko Maritime Inc.(1) |
5,000,000 |
|
4.21% |
|
— |
—% |
— |
—% |
Akamas Maritime Inc.(1) |
8,555,412 |
|
7.20% |
|
— |
—% |
— |
—% |
Chalkoessa Maritime Inc.(1) |
5,400,000 |
|
4.54% |
|
— |
—% |
— |
—% |
Officers and Directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Polys Hajioannou (1) |
48,381,427 |
|
40.70% |
|
— |
—% |
36,575 |
1.14% |
Dr. Loukas Barmparis |
— |
|
—% |
|
* |
|
* |
* |
Konstantinos Adamopoulos |
|
* |
|
* |
* |
|
* |
* |
Ioannis Foteinos |
|
* |
|
* |
— |
—% |
— |
—% |
Frank Sica |
|
* |
|
* |
* |
|
* |
* |
Ole Wikborg |
|
* |
|
* |
— |
—% |
— |
—% |
Christos Megalou |
|
* |
|
* |
— |
—% |
— |
—% |
All executive officers and directors as a
group (7 persons) |
49,004,751 |
|
41.22% |
12,752 |
1.58% |
75,575 |
2.37% |
|
(1) Controlled by Polys Hajioannou. |
In June 2008, we completed a registered
public offering of our shares of Common Stock in which the selling stockholder was Vorini Holdings Inc., and our Common Stock began trading
on the NYSE. Our major shareholders have the same voting rights as our other shareholders. As of February 24, 2023, we had 16 shareholders
of record; three of these shareholders of record were located in the U.S. and held an aggregate 77,539,106 shares of Common Stock, representing
approximately 65.23% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock. However, one of the U.S. shareholders of record is Cede & Co., a nominee
of The Depository Trust Company, which holds 77,190,505 shares of our Common Stock. Accordingly, we believe that the shares held by Cede
& Co. include shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by both holders in the U.S. and non-U.S. beneficial owners. We are not aware
of any arrangements the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in our change of control. We are not aware of any significant
changes in the percentage ownership held by any major shareholders since our initial public offering.
Polys Hajioannou owns or controls
approximately 40.70% of our outstanding Common Stock. He is able to significantly affect the outcome of matters on which our shareholders
are entitled to vote, including the election of our entire board of directors and other significant corporate actions. Shares of our Common
Stock held or controlled by Polys Hajioannou do not have different or unique voting rights.
B. Related Party Transactions |
Management Affiliations
Our chief executive officer, Polys
Hajioannou controls our Managers and one company which leases office space to us. Our Managers, along with the predecessor to Safety Management,
have provided services to vessels since 1965 and continue to provide technical, administrative, commercial and certain other services
which support our business, as well as comprehensive ship management services such as technical supervision and commercial management,
including chartering our vessels, pursuant to our Management Agreements described below.
Management Agreements
Under our Management Agreements,
our Managers are responsible for providing us with executive, technical, administrative commercial and certain other services, which include
the following:
Technical Services
These services include managing
day-to-day vessel operations, performing general vessel maintenance, ensuring regulatory compliance and compliance with the law of the
flag state of each vessel and of the places where the vessel operates, ensuring classification society compliance, supervising the maintenance
and general efficiency of vessels, arranging the hire of qualified officers and crew, training, transportation and lodging, insurance
(including handling and processing all claims) of, and appropriate investigation of any charterer concerns with respect to, the crew,
conducting union negotiations concerning the crew, performing normally scheduled drydocking and general and routine repairs, arranging
insurance for vessels (including marine hull and machinery, protection and indemnity and risks insurance), purchasing stores, supplies,
spares, lubricating oil and maintenance capital expenditures for vessels, appointing supervisors and technical consultants, providing
technical support, shoreside support and shipyard supervision, and attending to all other technical matters necessary to run our business.
Commercial Services
These services include chartering
the vessels that we own, assisting in our chartering, locating, purchasing, financing and negotiating the purchase and sale of our vessels,
supervising the design and construction of newbuilds, and such other commercial services as we may reasonably request from time to time.
Administrative Services
These services include providing
or arranging for all services necessary to the engagement, employment and compensation of certain of our employees, officers, consultants
and directors, administering payroll services, assistance with the preparation of our tax returns and financial statements, assistance
with corporate and regulatory compliance matters not related to our vessels, procuring legal and accounting services, assistance in complying
with U.S. and other relevant securities laws, human resources (including provision of our executive officers and directors of our subsidiaries),
cash management and bookkeeping services, development and monitoring of internal audit controls, disclosure controls and information technology,
assistance with all regulatory and reporting functions and obligations, furnishing any reports or financial information that might be
requested by us and other non-vessel related administrative services, assistance with office space, providing legal and financial compliance
services, overseeing banking services (including the opening, closing, operation and management of all of our accounts, including making
deposits and withdrawals reasonably necessary for the management of our business and day-to-day operations), arranging general insurance
and director and officer liability insurance (at our expense), providing all administrative services required for any subsequent debt
and equity financings and attending to all other administrative matters necessary to ensure the professional management of our business.
Reporting Structure
Our Managers report to us and to
our board of directors through our executive officers.
Compensation of Our Managers
On May 29, 2008, Safe Bulkers signed
a management agreement with Safety Management and on May 29, 2015, Safe Bulkers signed a management agreement with Safe Bulkers Management
(collectively the “Old Management Agreements”).
On May 29, 2018, following the expiration
of the Old Management Agreements, the Company signed the Original Management Agreements with the Managers, which have an initial term
of three years expiring on May 28, 2021 and could be extended for two additional terms of three years each. The fees provided by the Original
Management Agreements were fixed until May 29, 2021 and upon mutual agreement with the Managers, could be adjusted for a subsequent term
of three years each time in May 29, 2021 and May 29, 2024. On May 29, 2021, following the expiration of the initial three-year term, the
Original Management Agreements were extended for an additional term of three years, until May 29, 2024. On April 1, 2022, Safe Bulkers
signed the Management Agreement with Safe Bulkers Management Monaco Inc., with the initial term expiring on May 29, 2024, which can be
extended for one additional term of three years.
Under our Management Agreements,
in return for providing executive officers and technical, commercial and administrative services, our Managers receive a ship management
fee of €875 per day per managed vessel for vessels in our fleet and $250 per managed vessel per day for bareboat charters and one
of our Managers receives an annual ship management fee of €3.50 million. For the three year period from May 29, 2018 to May 28, 2021,
the annual ship management fee was €3.0 million. Further, our Managers receive a commission of 1.0% based on the contract price of
any vessel bought and a commission of 1.0% based on the contract price of any vessel sold by it on our behalf, including any contracted
newbuild. We also pay our Managers a supervision fee of $550,000 per newbuild, of which 50.0% is payable upon the signing of the relevant
supervision agreement, and 50.0% is payable upon successful completion of the sea trials of each newbuild, for the on-premises supervision
of all newbuilds we have agreed to acquire pursuant to shipbuilding contracts, memoranda of agreement, or otherwise.
The management fees do not cover
capital expenditure, financial costs and operating expenses for our vessels and our general and administrative expenses such as directors,
and officers’ liability insurance, legal and accounting fees and other similar third party expenses. More specifically, we reimburse
expenses incurred on our behalf by our Managers or their personnel directly related to the operation and management of our vessels, such
as:
|
~ |
interest, principal and other financial costs; |
|
~ |
voyage expenses; |
|
~ |
vessel operating expenses including crewing costs, surveyor’s attendance fees, bunkers, lubricant
oils, spares, survey fees, classification society fees, maintenance and repair costs, tonnage taxes and vetting expenses; |
|
~ |
commissions, remuneration or disbursements due to lawyers, brokers, agents, surveyors, consultants,
financial advisors, investment bankers, insurance advisors; |
|
~ |
deductibles, insurance premiums and/or P&I calls; and |
|
~ |
postage, communication, traveling, victualing and other out of pocket expenses. |
Each year, our Managers prepare
and submit to us a detailed draft budget for the next calendar year, which includes a statement of estimated revenue, estimated general
and administrative expenses and a proposed budget for capital expenditures, repairs or alterations. Once approved by us, this draft budget
becomes the approved budget.
Term and Termination Rights
Subject to the termination rights
described below, the current term of the Management Agreements will expire on May 29, 2024 and is renewable for an additional three-year
period. The Management Agreements will be automatically extended on a three-year basis, subject to our ability to terminate each Management
Agreement upon written notice at least 24 months prior to the end of the current term. Each Management Agreement will expire on May 29,
2027 and we expect to enter into new agreements with the Managers upon their expiration. The terms of any such new agreements have not
yet been determined.
Our Managers’ Termination
Rights
Each Manager may terminate the applicable
Management Agreement prior to the end of its term if:
|
~ |
an aggregate amount in excess of $100,000 payable by us is not paid when due or if due on demand,
within 20 business days following demand by the Manager; |
|
~ |
we default in the performance of any other material obligation under the Management Agreement and
the matter is unresolved within 20 business days after we receive written notice of such default from the Manager; |
|
~ |
the management fee determined by arbitration in respect of any three-year period following the initial
term is unsatisfactory to the Manager, in which case the Manager may terminate the Management Agreement effective at the end of such
term; |
|
~ |
any acquisition of our shares or a merger, consolidation or similar transaction results in any “person”
or “group” acquiring 40.0% or more of the total voting power of our or the resulting entity’s outstanding voting
securities, and such percentage represents a higher percentage of such voting power than that held directly or indirectly by Polys
Hajioannou; |
|
~ |
the approval by our shareholders of a proposed merger, consolidation, recapitalization or similar
transaction, as a result of which any person acquiring our shares of Common Stock becomes the “beneficial owner” (as
defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of 40.0% or more of the total voting power of the outstanding
voting securities of the resulting entity following such transaction, and such percentage represents a higher percentage of such
voting power than that held directly or indirectly by Polys Hajioannou; or |
|
~ |
there is a change in directors after which at least one of the members of our board of directors
is not a continuing director. |
“Continuing directors”
means, as of any date of determination, any member of our board of directors who was:
|
~ |
a member of our board of directors on May 29, 2018; or |
|
~ |
nominated for election or elected to our board of directors with the approval of a majority of the
directors then in office who were either directors on May 29, 2018 or whose nomination or election was previously so approved. |
Our Termination Rights
In addition to certain standard
termination rights, we may terminate each Management Agreement prior to the end of its term if:
|
~ |
the Manager commits a willful and material breach in the performance of any material obligation
under our Management Agreement and the matter is not resolved within 40 business days after the Manager receives from us written
notice of such default; |
|
~ |
an aggregate amount in excess of $100,000 payable by the Manager to us or third parties under our
Management Agreement is not paid or accounted for within 10 business days following written notice by us; or |
|
~ |
any time after May 29, 2024, upon our delivery of 12 months’ written notice to the Manager
(a “Third Term Termination Notice”). |
A “willful and material breach”
means, a material breach of the applicable Management Agreement, as determined by a final, non-appealable judgment of a court or independent
tribunal of competent jurisdiction, that is a consequence of a deliberate act undertaken by the breaching party, with knowledge that the
taking of such act would cause a breach of the applicable Management Agreement, and which act has subjected the Company and its subsidiaries,
taken as a whole, to uninsured liability, individually or in the aggregate, in an amount in excess of $100,000,000.
Termination Fees
In the event that either Management
Agreement is terminated prior to the fully-extended expiration date other than pursuant to (a) the Company’s termination of the
applicable Management Agreement due to the Manager’s ceasing to conduct business, insolvency or force majeure, (b) a termination
resulting from the Manager’s willful and material breach of the applicable Management Agreement or (c) a termination pursuant to
a validly-delivered termination notice by the Company to the Manager (other than a Third Term Termination Notice), then, within three
business days of such termination, the Company shall pay to Safe Bulkers Management an amount in cash equal to the Management Fees paid
or payable to each Manager, in the aggregate, during the 36 months preceding the applicable termination.
Non-Competition
Each Manager has agreed that, during
the term of our Management Agreement and for one year after its termination, such Manager will not provide any management services to,
or with respect to, any drybulk vessels, other than in the following circumstances:
|
(a) |
pursuant to its involvement with us; or |
|
(b) |
with respect to drybulk vessels that are owned or operated by companies affiliated with our chief
executive officer or his family members, subject in each case to compliance with, or waivers of, the restrictive covenant agreements
entered into |
between us and
companies affiliated with our chief executive officer.
Each Manager has also agreed that
if one of our drybulk vessels and a drybulk vessel owned or operated by a company affiliated with our chief executive officer are both
available and meet the criteria for a charter being fixed by such Manager, our drybulk vessel will receive such charter.
Sale of Our Manager
Each Manager has agreed that, during
the term of the Management Agreement and for one year after its termination, each Manager will not transfer, assign, sell or dispose of
all or substantially all of its business that is necessary for the performance of its services under the Management Agreement without
the prior written consent of our board of directors. Furthermore, during such period, in the event of any proposed change in control of
the Manager, we have a 30-day right of first offer to purchase such Manager. Each Management Agreement defines a “proposed change
in control of the Manager” to mean (a) the approval by the board of directors of the Manager or the shareholders of the Manager
of a proposed sale of all or substantially all of the assets or property of the Manager necessary for the performance of its services
under the Management Agreement; or (b) the approval of any transaction that would result in: (i) Polys Hajioannou or Vorini Holdings Inc.,
or any entity controlled by, or under common control with, any of the above, beneficially owning, directly or indirectly, less than 60.0%
of the outstanding voting securities or voting power of the Manager or Machairiotissa Holdings Inc. (the sole shareholder of the Manager),
respectively, or (ii) Polys Hajioannou or Vorini Holdings Inc., or any entity controlled by, or under common control with, any of the
above, together with all directors, officers and employees of the Manager beneficially owning, directly or indirectly, less than 80.0%
of the outstanding voting securities or voting power of the Manager or Machairiotissa Holdings Inc., respectively.
Each Management Agreement also provides
us the right to obtain certain information about the ownership of the Manager.
The foregoing description of the
Management Agreements does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Management Agreements, copies
of which are attached as Exhibit 4.1 and Exhibit 4.2 and incorporated herein by reference.
Restrictive Covenant Agreements
Under the amended restrictive covenant
agreements entered into with us, Polys Hajioannou, Vorini Holdings Inc., Machairiotissa Holdings Inc., or any entity controlled by, or
under common control with, any of the above (together, the “Hajioannou Entities”), have agreed to restrictions on their ownership
or operation of any drybulk vessels or the acquisition, investment in or control of any business involved in the ownership or operation
of drybulk vessels, subject to the exceptions described below.
In the case of Polys Hajioannou,
the restricted period continues until the later of (a) one year following the termination of his service as our director and (b) one year
following the termination of his employment with us. In the case of the Hajioannou Entities, the restricted period continues until one
year following the termination of both Management Agreements.
Notwithstanding these restrictions,
Polys Hajioannou and the Hajioannou Entities are permitted to engage in the restricted activities during the restricted periods in the
following circumstances:
|
(a) |
pursuant to their involvement with us; |
|
(b) |
pursuant to their involvement with a Manager, subject to compliance with, or waivers of, the applicable
Management Agreement; |
|
(c) |
with respect to certain permitted acquisitions (as defined below), provided that (i) any commercial
management of drybulk vessels controlled by the restricted individuals and entities in connection with such permitted acquisition
is performed by either of the Managers and (ii) the restricted individuals and entities comply with the requirements for permitted
acquisitions described below; |
|
(d) |
with respect to the direct or indirect ownership, operation or financing by our chief executive
officer of a maximum of eight drybulk vessels on the water at any one time and an unlimited number of contracts with shipyards for
newbuild drybulk vessels as part of his estate or family planning, provided that (i) such drybulk vessels or newbuilding contracts
have been first offered to us and refused by the majority of our independent directors and (ii) such vessels have been acquired on
pricing terms and conditions that are not more favorable than those offered to us; |
|
(e) |
pursuant to their passive ownership of up to 9.99% of the outstanding voting securities of any publicly
traded company that is engaged in the business of owning or operating drybulk vessels; and |
|
(f) |
in the case of Mr. Hajioannou, with respect to any investment company which has been developed by
a permitted acquisition; provided, that Mr. Hajioannou (i) does not own in excess of 35% of such other company (“Minority Invested
Business”), (ii) does not increase his ownership except as a result of an additional permitted acquisition which is approved
by a majority of our independent directors, (iii) presents all business opportunities related to drybulk vessels to Safe Bulkers
in the first instance and (iv) delivers to Safe Bulkers an annual report setting forth Mr. Hajioannou’s aggregate percentage
ownership in the Minority Invested Business and additional information on the vessels owned by such Minority Invested Business. For
purposes of the restrictive covenant agreements, Polys Hajioannou shall not be deemed to control any such Minority Invested Business
as a result of his service on the board of directors or other governing body of such Minority Invested Business so long as he is
not a party to any arrangement relating to investment or management decisions. The commercial management of any drybulk vessel owned,
operated or financed by an investment company of which Polys Hajioannou does not own in excess of 35% shall not be performed by either
of our Managers or any other person or entity in which Mr. Hajioannou has an ownership interest. |
As noted above, Polys Hajioannou
and the Hajioannou Entities are permitted to engage in certain restricted activities with respect to two types of permitted acquisitions.
One such permitted acquisition is an acquisition of a drybulk vessel or an acquisition or
investment in a drybulk vessel business
on terms and conditions as to price that are not more favorable, and on such other terms and conditions that are not materially more favorable,
than those first offered to us and refused by a majority of our independent directors. A second type of permitted acquisition is an acquisition
of a group of vessels or a business that includes non-drybulk vessels and non-drybulk vessel businesses, provided that less than 50.0%
of the fair market value of the acquisition is attributable to drybulk vessels or drybulk vessel businesses. Under this second type of
permitted acquisition, we must be promptly given the opportunity to buy the drybulk vessels or drybulk vessel businesses included in the
acquisition for their fair market value plus certain break-up costs. Both of these types of permitted acquisitions require that the commercial
management of any drybulk vessels acquired as permitted acquisitions be performed by either of our Managers. The commercial management
of any drybulk vessel or contract for a newbuild drybulk vessel owned, operated or financed by Polys Hajioannou and entities affiliated
with him for his estate or family planning purposes is not required to be managed by either of our Managers and the management of any
vessels in a Minority Owned Business shall not be performed by either of our Managers or any other person or entity in which Mr. Hajioannou
has an ownership interest.
Polys Hajioannou and the Hajioannou
Entities have also agreed that if one of our drybulk vessels and a drybulk vessel owned or operated by any of the Hajioannou Entities
are both available and meet the criteria for a charter being fixed by either of our Managers, our drybulk vessels will receive such charter.
The restrictive covenant agreements
further provide that for each drybulk vessel or contract for a newbuild drybulk vessel owned, operated or financed by Polys Hajioannou
or a Hajioannou Entity other than through us, Polys Hajioannou or the applicable Hajioannou entity is required to deliver to us a written
report with respect to such vessel or newbuild within the first quarter of each fiscal year. The report for any drybulk vessel is required
to include certain information, such as charter information with respect to charters arranged or in place during the period between the
first day of the previous fiscal year and the date of the report, including the type of charter employment (e.g., time or voyage charters),
the charter rate, commissions paid to brokers or other third parties, the charter period and the total revenues earned with respect to
charters conducted during such period, running costs with respect to such drybulk vessel in the previous fiscal year, expected date of
next drydocking and the estimated cost of such drydocking, and date of the next special survey. The report for any contracted newbuild
drybulk vessel is required to include charter information, if any, with respect to charters arranged as of the date of the report, including
the type of charter employment, the charter rate, commissions paid to brokers or other third parties and the charter period.
The foregoing description of the
restrictive covenant agreements, as amended, does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the restrictive
covenant agreements, copies of which are attached as Exhibit 4.3, Exhibit 4.4, Exhibit 4.11 and Exhibit 4.12, and incorporated herein
by reference.
Registration Rights Agreement
In connection with the closing of
our initial public offering, we entered into a registration rights agreement with Vorini Holdings Inc., one of our principal shareholders,
pursuant to which we have granted it and certain of its transferees the right, under certain circumstances and subject to certain restrictions,
to require us to register under the Securities Act shares of our Common Stock held by those persons. Under the registration rights agreement,
Vorini Holdings Inc. and certain of its transferees have the right to request us to register the sale of shares held by them on their
behalf and may require us to make available shelf registration statements permitting sales of shares into the market from time to time
over an extended period. In addition, those persons have the ability to exercise certain piggyback registration rights in connection with
registered offerings initiated by us. Vorini Holdings Inc. currently owns 19,426,015 shares entitled to these registration rights.
Principal executive office lease
The Company leases office space
from a company controlled by Polys Hajioannou, at Apt. D11, Les Acanthes, 6, Avenue des Citronniers, MC98000 Monaco, where our principal
executive office is established. The office space lease contract was for a period from February 2014 until February 2023 with an annual
lease payment initially agreed in 2014 in the amount of EUR 63,000 equivalent to $67 as of December 31, 2022, adjusted annually based
on the cost of construction as published in the National Institute of Statistics & Economic Studies of Monaco, plus expenses, and
is recorded in “General and administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. In January 2023, the office
space lease contract was renewed for a period of three years with an annual lease payment in the amount of EUR 86,400.
Credit Facilities
During 2022, the Company entered
into an agreement with a financial institution for an amount up to $80.0 million secured by seven vessels owned by respective subsidiaries
of the Company. At the same time, all credit facilities with this financial institution were refinanced and cancelled, namely a revolving
credit facility of the Company signed in 2019 for an original amount of $20.0 million and increased to $30.0 million in 2020, a credit
facility signed in 2020 for an original amount up to $20.0 million and increased to $25.0 million in 2022, and another credit facility
signed in 2021 for an original amount of up to $70.0 million.
One of the independent members of
the board of directors of the Company currently serves as the Chief Executive Officer of the financial institution that was the lender
in the above credit facilities. All above transactions were evaluated and approved by the board of directors of the Company excluding
that independent member of the board of directors of the Company.
Bond issuance
In February 2022, a subsidiary of
the Company successfully completed a public offer in Greece of €100.0 million of an unsecured bond that was admitted for trading
in the Athens Exchange under the ticker symbol SBB1. See “Item 5. OPERATING AND
FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS-—B.
Liquidity and Capital Resources—Bond” for more information. One of the independent members of the board of directors of the
Company currently serves as the Chief Executive Officer of the financial institution that was the adviser and one of the lead underwriters
in the public offer of the Bond. The transaction was evaluated and approved by the board of directors of the Company excluding that independent
member of the board of directors of the Company.
C. Interests of Experts and Counsel |
Not applicable. |
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information |
See “Item
18. Financial Statements” below for more information. |
Legal Proceedings
We are not involved in any legal
proceedings which may have, or have had, a significant effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or liquidity,
nor are we aware of any other proceedings that are pending or threatened which may have a significant effect on our business, financial
position, results of operations or liquidity.
The nature of our business exposes
us to the risk of lawsuits for damages or penalties relating to, among other things, personal injury, property casualty and environmental
contamination. From time to time, we may be subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business, principally personal
injury and property casualty claims. We expect that these claims would be covered by insurance, subject to customary deductibles. However,
such claims, even if lacking merit, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources.
Dividend Policy
During 2020, we declared and paid
four quarterly consecutive dividends of $0.50 per share, of Series C Preferred Shares, totaling $4.6 million, and of Series D Preferred
Shares, totaling $6.4 million. During 2021, we declared and paid four quarterly consecutive dividends of $0.50 per share, of Series C
Preferred Shares, totaling $4.6 million, and of Series D Preferred Shares, totaling $6.4 million.
During 2022, we declared and paid
four quarterly consecutive dividends of $0.50 per share of Series C Preferred Shares, totaling $2.4 million, and four quarterly consecutive
dividends of $0.50 per share of Series D Preferred Shares, totaling $6.4 million. In January 2023, we declared and paid a quarterly dividend
of $0.50 per share, of Series C Preferred Shares, totaling $0.4 million, and of Series D Preferred Shares, totaling $1.6 million.
In March 2022, we re-established
paying dividends to our common shareholders and have since paid another three quarterly consecutive dividends of $0.05 per common share,
totaling $24.1 million. The last time we had previously paid dividend on our shares of common stock was in August 2015. In February 2023,
we declared a dividend on the Company’s common stock of $0.05 per share, totaling $5.9 million, payable on or about March 17, 2023
to shareholders of record at the close of trading of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE on March 1, 2023.
Our future liquidity needs will
impact our dividend policy. The declaration and payment of future dividends, if any, will always be subject to the discretion of the Board
of Directors of the Company. There is no guarantee that the Company’s Board of Directors will determine to issue cash dividends
in the future. The timing and amount of any dividends declared will depend on, among other things: (i) the Company’s earnings, fleet
employment profile, financial condition and cash requirements and available sources of liquidity; (ii) decisions in relation to the Company’s
growth, fleet renewal and leverage strategies; (iii) provisions of Marshall Islands and Liberian law governing the payment of dividends;
(iv) restrictive covenants in the Company’s existing and future debt instruments; and (v) global economic and financial conditions.
Our ability to pay dividends may be limited by the amount of cash we can generate from operations following the payment of fees and expenses
and the establishment of any reserves, as well as additional factors unrelated to our profitability. In addition, cash dividends on our
Common Stock are subject to the priority of dividends on our Preferred Shares. We are a holding company and we depend on the ability of
our subsidiaries to distribute funds to us in order to satisfy our financial obligations and to make dividend payments. See “Item
3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Common Stock and Preferred Shares” for a discussion of the
risks related to our ability to pay dividends.
No significant change has occurred
since the date of the annual financial statements included in this annual report on Form 20-F, other than as described in Note 23 - Subsequent
Events to our consolidated financial statements included herein.
ITEM 9.
THE OFFER AND LISTING |
Trading on the NYSE
Since our initial public offering
in the U.S. on May 29, 2008, our Common Stock has been listed on the NYSE under the symbol
“SB”
Since May 7, 2014, our Series C Preferred Shares have been listed on the NYSE under the symbol “SB. PR. C.” Since June 30,
2014, our Series D Preferred Shares have been listed on the NYSE under the symbol “SB. PR. D.”
ITEM 10.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
|
A. Share Capital |
Under our articles of incorporation,
our authorized capital stock consists of 200,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, of which, as of December 31,
2022 and February 24, 2023, 118,868,317 and 118,878,626 shares were issued and outstanding, respectively, and 20,000,000 shares of
blank check preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, of which, as of December 31, 2022 and February 24, 2023, 804,950 shares of
Series C Preferred Shares and 3,195,050 shares of Series D Preferred Shares were issued and outstanding. Of this blank check preferred
stock, 1,000,000 shares have been designated Series A Participating Preferred Stock in connection with our adoption of a shareholders
rights plan as described below under “—Shareholders Rights Plan.” All of our shares of stock are in registered form.
Please see Note 9 of the consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report for a discussion of the history of our share capital.
B. Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws |
Our purpose, as stated in our articles
of incorporation, is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may now or hereafter be organized under the BCA. Our
articles of incorporation and bylaws do not impose any limitations on the ownership rights of our shareholders.
The rights of our shareholders are
set forth in our articles of incorporation and bylaws, as well as the BCA. Amendments to our articles of incorporation require the affirmative
vote of the holders of a majority of all outstanding shares entitled to vote, except that amendments to certain provisions of our articles
of incorporation dealing with the rights of shareholders, the board of directors, our bylaws and amendments to the articles of incorporation
require the affirmative vote of at least 75.0% of all outstanding shares entitled to vote. Amendments to our bylaws require the affirmative
vote of at least 75.0% of all outstanding shares entitled to vote.
Under our bylaws, annual shareholder
meetings will be held at a time and place selected by our board of directors. The meetings may be held inside or outside of the Republic
of the Marshall Islands. Special meetings may be called by the chairman of the board of directors, the chief executive officer or by the
chief executive officer or secretary at the request of a majority of the board of directors. Our board of directors may set a record date
between 15 and 60 days before the date of any meeting to determine the shareholders that will be eligible to receive notice and vote at
the meeting. Our bylaws permit shareholder action by unanimous written consent.
We are registered with the Registrar
of Corporations of the Marshall Islands under registration number 27394.
Directors
Under our articles of incorporation
and bylaws, our directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at each annual meeting of the shareholders by the holders of shares
entitled to vote in the election. There is no provision for cumulative voting. Our articles of incorporation and bylaws provide for a
staggered board of directors whereby directors shall be divided into three classes: Class I, Class II and Class III. The term of our Class
I directors expires in 2024, the term of our Class II directors expires in 2025 and the term of our Class III directors expires in 2023.
At each annual meeting, individuals elected as directors are elected to hold office until the third succeeding annual meeting.
Pursuant to the provisions of our
bylaws, the board of directors may change the number of directors to not less than three, nor more than 15, by a vote of a majority of
the entire board. Each director shall be elected to serve until the third succeeding annual meeting of shareholders and until his or her
successor shall have been duly elected and qualified, except in the event of death, resignation or removal. A vacancy on the board created
by death, resignation, removal (which may only be for cause), or failure of the shareholders to elect the entire class of directors to
be elected at any election of directors or for any other reason may be filled only by an affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining
directors then in office, even if less than a quorum, at any special meeting called for that purpose or at any regular meeting of the
board of directors. The board of directors has the authority to fix the amounts which shall be payable to the non-employee members of
our board of directors for attendance at any meeting or for services rendered to us.
Common Stock
Each outstanding share of Common
Stock entitles the holder to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders. Subject to preferences that may be applicable
to any outstanding shares of preferred stock, holders of shares of Common Stock are entitled to receive ratably all dividends, if any,
declared thereon by our board of directors out of funds legally available for dividends. Upon our dissolution or liquidation or the sale
of all or substantially all of our assets, after payment in full of all amounts required to be paid to creditors and to the holders of
preferred stock having liquidation preferences, if any, the holders of our Common Stock will be entitled to receive pro rata our remaining
assets available for distribution. Holders of Common Stock do not have conversion, redemption or preemptive rights to subscribe to any
of our securities. All outstanding shares of Common Stock are fully paid and non-assessable. The rights, preferences and privileges of
holders of Common Stock are subject to the rights of
the holders of any shares of preferred
stock which we may issue in the future. Our Common Stock is not subject to any sinking fund provisions and no holder of any shares will
be required to make additional contributions of capital with respect to our shares in the future. There are no provisions in our articles
of incorporation or bylaws discriminating against a shareholder because of his or her ownership of a particular number of shares.
On August 3, 2020, our shareholders
granted discretionary authority to the Company’s board of directors to effect one or more reverse stock splits of the issued and
outstanding shares of common stock of the Company, at ratios within the range from 1-for-2 up to 1-for-5 in the aggregate. Our board of
directors has not elected to implement the reverse stock split. If our board of directors determines to implement a reverse stock split,
depending on the ratio for such reverse stock split determined by our board of directors, no less than two and no more than five shares
of our existing common stock will be combined into one share of common stock. Our board of directors could implement a reverse stock split
at any time on or before the day immediately preceding the company’s annual meeting of shareholders in 2021. Our board may, in its
discretion, elect not to implement any reverse stock split if it determines that a reverse stock split would not be in the best interests
of the Company and our shareholders.
We are not aware of any limitations
on the rights to own our Common Stock, including rights of non-resident or foreign shareholders to hold or exercise voting rights on our
Common Stock, imposed by foreign law or by our articles of incorporation or bylaws.
Preferred Stock
Our articles of incorporation authorize
our board of directors, without any further vote or action by our shareholders, to issue up to 20,000,000 shares of blank check preferred
stock, of which 1,000,000 shares have been designated Series A Participating Preferred Stock, in connection with our adoption of a shareholder
rights plan as described below under “—Shareholders Rights Plan,” and as of December 31, 2022 and February 24,
2023, 804,950 have been designated as Series C Preferred Shares and 3,195,050 have been designated as Series D Preferred Shares, and to
determine, with respect to any series of preferred stock established by our board of directors, the terms and rights of that series, including:
|
~ |
the designation of the series; |
|
~ |
the number of shares of the series; |
|
~ |
the preferences and relative, participating, option or other special rights, if any, and any qualifications,
limitations or restrictions of such series; and |
|
~ |
the voting rights, if any, of the holders of the series. |
Shareholders Rights Plan
General
Our board of directors declared
a dividend of one right for each outstanding share of Safe Bulkers’ common stock. The dividend was paid on August 20, 2020 to the
shareholders of record on August 17, 2020. As a result, each share of our Common Stock includes a right that entitles the holder to purchase
from us a unit consisting of one-thousandth of a share of our Series A Participating Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $5.20 per
unit, subject to specified adjustments. The rights are issued pursuant to a shareholders rights agreement between us and American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, LLC as rights agent. Until a right is exercised, the holder of a right will have no rights to vote or receive
dividends or any other shareholders rights.
The rights may have anti-takeover
effects. The rights will cause substantial dilution to any person or group that attempts to acquire us without the approval of our board
of directors. As a result, the overall effect of the rights may be to render more difficult or discourage a merger, tender offer or other
business combination involving the Company that is not supported by our board of directors. Because our board of directors can approve
a redemption of the rights or a permitted offer, the rights should not interfere with a merger or other business combination approved
by our board of directors. The adoption of the rights agreement was approved by our board of directors on August 6, 2020.
We have summarized the material
terms and conditions of the rights agreement and the rights below. For a complete description of the rights, we encourage you to read
the shareholder rights agreement, which we have filed as an exhibit to this annual report.
Detachment of the Rights
The rights are attached to all certificates
representing our outstanding common stock and will attach to all common stock certificates we issue prior to the rights distribution date
that we describe below. The rights are not exercisable until after the rights distribution date and will expire at the close of business
on August 5, 2030, unless we redeem or exchange them earlier as described below. The rights will separate from the common stock and a
rights distribution date will occur, subject to specified exceptions, on the earlier of the following two dates:
|
(i) |
ten days following the first public announcement that a person or group of affiliated or associated
persons or an “acquiring person” has acquired or obtained the right to acquire beneficial ownership of 10% or more of
our outstanding common stock; or |
|
(ii) |
ten business days following the start of a tender or exchange offer that would result, if closed,
in a person becoming an “acquiring person.” |
Derivative positions are included
for purposes of determining beneficial ownership.
Shares owned by Polys Hajioannou,
the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, or Nicolaos Hadjioannou and entities controlled by and/or affiliated or associated
with Mr. Hajioannou or Mr. Hadjioannou or members or their respective families are not subject to the restrictions of the Rights Plan
and shareholders who beneficially owned 10% or more of Safe Bulkers’ outstanding common stock prior to the first public announcement
by the Company of the adoption of the Rights Plan will not trigger
any penalties under the rights plan
so long as they do not acquire beneficial ownership of any additional shares of common stock at a time when they still beneficially own
10% or more of such common stock.
Until the rights distribution date:
|
~ |
our common stock certificates will evidence the rights, and the rights
will be transferable only with those certificates; and |
|
~ |
any new shares of common stock will be issued with rights, and new certificates
will contain a notation incorporating the shareholders rights agreement by reference. |
As soon as practicable after the
rights distribution date, the rights agent will mail certificates representing the rights to holders of record of common stock at the
close of business on that date. As of the rights distribution date, only separate rights certificates will represent the rights.
We will not issue rights with any
shares of common stock we issue after the rights distribution date, except as our board of directors may otherwise determine.
Flip-In Event
A “flip-in event” will
occur under the shareholders rights agreement when a person becomes an acquiring person. If a flip-in event occurs and we do not redeem
the rights as described under the heading “—Redemption of Rights” below, each right, other than any right that has become
void, as described below, will become exercisable at the time it is no longer redeemable for the number of shares of common stock, or,
in some cases, cash, property or other of our securities, having a current market price equal to two times the exercise price of such
right.
If a flip-in event occurs, all rights
that then are, or in some circumstances that were, beneficially owned by or transferred to an acquiring person or specified related parties
will become void in the circumstances which the shareholder rights agreement specifies.
Flip-Over Event
A “flip-over event”
will occur under the shareholder rights agreement when, at any time after a person has become an acquiring person:
|
~ |
we are acquired in a merger or other business combination transaction; or |
|
~ |
50% or more of our assets, cash flows or earning power is sold or transferred. |
If a flip-over event occurs, each
holder of a right, other than any right that has become void as we describe under the heading “—Flip-in event” above,
will have the right to receive the number of shares of common stock of the acquiring company having a current market price equal to two
times the exercise price of such right.
Antidilution
The number of outstanding rights
associated with our common stock is subject to adjustment for any stock split, stock dividend or subdivision, combination or reclassification
of our common stock occurring prior to the rights distribution date. With some exceptions, the shareholders rights agreement does not
require us to adjust the exercise price of the rights until cumulative adjustments amount to at least 1% of the exercise price. It also
does not require us to issue fractional shares of our preferred stock that are not integral multiples of one one-hundredth of a share,
and, instead, we may make a cash adjustment based on the market price of the common stock on the last trading date prior to the date of
exercise. The rights agreement reserves us the right to require, prior to the occurrence of any flip-in event or flip-over event, that,
on any exercise of rights, that a number of rights must be exercised so that we will issue only whole shares of stock.
Redemption of Rights
At any time until ten days after
the date on which the occurrence of a flip-in event is first publicly announced, we may redeem the rights in whole, but not in part, at
a redemption price of $0.01 per right. The redemption price is subject to adjustment for any stock split, stock dividend or similar transaction
occurring before the date of redemption. At our option, we may pay that redemption price in cash, shares of common stock or any other
consideration our board of directors may select. The rights are not exercisable after a flip-in event until they are no longer redeemable.
If our board of directors timely orders the redemption of the rights, the rights will terminate on the effectiveness of that action.
Exchange of Rights
We may, at our option, exchange
the rights (other than rights owned by an acquiring person or an affiliate or an associate of an acquiring person, which have become void),
in whole or in part. The exchange must be at an exchange ratio of one share of common stock per right, subject to specified adjustments
at any time after the occurrence of a flip-in event and prior to:
|
~ |
any person other than our existing shareholder becoming the beneficial owner of common stock with
voting power equal to 50% or more of the total voting power of all shares of common stock entitled to vote in the election of directors;
or |
|
~ |
the occurrence of a flip-over event. |
Amendment of Terms of Rights
While the rights are outstanding,
we may amend the provisions of the shareholders rights agreement only as follows:
|
~ |
to cure any ambiguity, omission, defect or inconsistency; |
|
~ |
to make changes that do not adversely affect the interests of holders of rights, excluding the interests
of any acquiring person; or |
|
~ |
to shorten or lengthen any time period under the shareholders rights agreement, except that we cannot
change the time period when rights may be redeemed or lengthen any time period, unless such lengthening protects, enhances or clarifies
the benefits of holders of rights other than an acquiring person. |
At any time when no rights are outstanding,
we may amend any of the provisions of the shareholders rights agreement, other than decreasing the redemption price.
Dissenters’ rights of appraisal
and payment
Under the BCA, our shareholders
have the right to dissent from various corporate actions, including any merger or sale of all, or substantially all, of our assets not
made in the usual course of our business, and receive payment of the fair value of their shares as designated in the BCA. In the event
of any amendment of our articles of incorporation, a stockholder also has the right to dissent and receive payment for his or her shares
if the amendment alters certain rights in respect of those shares. The dissenting stockholder must follow the procedures set forth in
the BCA to receive payment. In the event that we and any dissenting stockholder fail to agree on a price for the shares, the BCA procedures
involve, among other things, the institution of proceedings in the high court of the Republic of the Marshall Islands or in any appropriate
court in any jurisdiction in which our shares are primarily traded on a local or national securities exchange. The value of the shares
of the dissenting stockholder is fixed by the court after reference, if the court so elects, to the recommendations of a court-appointed
appraiser.
Shareholders’ Derivative
Actions
Under the BCA, any of our shareholders
may bring an action in our name to procure a judgment in our favor, also known as a derivative action, provided that the stockholder bringing
the action is a holder of common stock of our shares both at the time the derivative action is commenced and at the time of the transaction
to which the action relates. The action must set forth with particularity the stockholder’s efforts to have the Board initiate such
action or the reason for not making any such effort.
Limitations on Liability and
Indemnification of Officers and Directors
The BCA authorizes corporations
to limit or eliminate the personal liability of directors and officers to corporations and their shareholders for monetary damages for
breaches of directors’ fiduciary duties. Our articles of incorporation include a provision that eliminates the personal liability
of directors for monetary damages for actions taken as a director to the fullest extent permitted by law.
Our bylaws provide that we must
indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent authorized by law. We are also expressly authorized to advance certain expenses
(including attorneys’ fees and disbursements and court costs) to our directors and officers and carry directors’ and officers’
insurance providing indemnification for our directors, officers and certain employees for some liabilities. We believe that these indemnification
provisions and insurance are useful to attract and retain qualified directors and executive officers.
The limitation of liability and
indemnification provisions in our articles of incorporation and bylaws may discourage shareholders from bringing a lawsuit against directors
for breach of their fiduciary duty. These provisions may also have the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation against
directors and officers, even though such an action, if successful, might otherwise benefit us and our shareholders. In addition, shareholders’
investments may be adversely affected to the extent we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against directors and officers pursuant
to these indemnification provisions.
There is currently no pending material
litigation or proceeding involving any of our directors, officers or employees for which indemnification is sought.
Anti-Takeover Effect of Certain
Provisions of our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
Several provisions of our articles
of incorporation and bylaws, which are summarized in the following paragraphs, may have anti-takeover effects. These provisions are intended
to avoid costly takeover battles, lessen our vulnerability to a hostile change of control and enhance the ability of our board of directors
to maximize stockholder value in connection with any unsolicited offer to acquire us. However, these anti-takeover provisions could also
delay, defer or prevent (a) the merger or acquisition of our company by means of a tender offer, a proxy contest or otherwise that a stockholder
might consider in its best interest, including attempts that may result in a premium over the market price for the shares held by the
shareholders, and (b) the removal of incumbent officers and directors.
Blank Check Preferred Stock
Under the terms of our articles
of incorporation, our board of directors has authority, without any further vote or action by our shareholders, to issue up to 20,000,000
shares of blank check preferred stock, of which 1,000,000 shares have been designated Series A Participating Preferred Stock, in connection
with our adoption of a shareholder rights plan as described above under “-Shareholder Rights Plan” and as of December 31,
2022 and February 24, 2023, 804,950 have been designated as Series C Preferred Shares and 3,195,050 have been designated as Series
D Preferred Shares. As of the Redemption Date, no shares of Series B Preferred Shares remained outstanding. Our board of directors may
issue shares of preferred stock on terms calculated to discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of our company or the removal
of our management.
Classified Board of Directors
Our articles of incorporation provide
for a board of directors serving staggered, three-year terms. Approximately one-third of our board of directors will be elected each year.
This classified board provision could discourage a third party from making a tender offer for our shares or attempting to obtain control
of our company. It could also delay shareholders who do not agree with the policies of the board of directors from removing a majority
of the board of directors for two years.
Election and Removal of Directors
Our articles of incorporation prohibit
cumulative voting in the election of directors. Our bylaws require parties other than the board of directors to give advance written notice
of nominations for the election of directors. Our articles of incorporation and
bylaws also provide that our directors
may be removed only for cause. These provisions may discourage, delay or prevent the removal of incumbent officers and directors.
Calling of Special Meeting of Shareholders
Our articles of incorporation and
bylaws provide that special meetings of our shareholders may only be called by our Chairman of the board of directors, chief executive
officer or secretary of the Company, at the request of a majority of our board of directors.
Advance Notice Requirements for
Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations
Our bylaws provide that shareholders
seeking to nominate candidates for election as directors or to bring business before an annual meeting of shareholders must provide timely
notice of their proposal in writing to the corporate secretary.
Generally, to be timely, a stockholder’s
notice must be received at our offices not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary date of the previous
year’s annual meeting. Our bylaws also specify requirements as to the form and content of a stockholder’s notice. These provisions
may impede shareholders’ ability to bring matters before an annual meeting of shareholders or to make nominations for directors
at an annual meeting of shareholders.
C. Material Contracts |
Not applicable. |
D.
Exchange Controls and Other Limitations Affecting Security Holders |
Under Marshall Islands law, there
are currently no restrictions on the export or import of capital, including foreign exchange controls or restrictions that affect the
remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to non-resident and non-Marshall Islands citizen holders of our Common Stock.
Marshall Islands Tax Considerations
We are a non-resident domestic Marshall
Islands corporation. Because we do not, and we do not expect that we will, conduct business or operations in the Republic of the Marshall
Islands, under current Marshall Islands law we are not subject to tax on income or capital gains and our shareholders (so long as they
are not citizens or residents of the Republic of the Marshall Islands) will not be subject to Marshall Islands taxation or withholding
on dividends and other distributions (including upon a return of capital) we make to our shareholders. In addition, so long as our shareholders
are not citizens or residents of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, our shareholders will not be subject to Marshall Islands stamp,
capital gains or other taxes on the purchase, holding or disposition of our Common Stock or Preferred Shares, and our shareholders will
not be required by the Republic of the Marshall Islands to file a tax return relating to our Common Stock or Preferred Shares.
Each stockholder is urged to consult
its tax counselor or other advisor with regard to the legal and tax consequences, under the laws of pertinent jurisdictions, including
the Republic of the Marshall Islands, of its investment in us.
Further, it is the responsibility
of each stockholder to file all state, local and non-U.S., as well as U.S. federal tax returns that may be required of it.
Liberian Tax Considerations
Some of our vessel-owning subsidiaries
are incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Liberia. The Republic of Liberia enacted a new income tax act effective as of January
1, 2001 (the “New Act”) which did not distinguish between the taxation of “non-resident” Liberian corporations,
such as our subsidiaries, which conduct no business in Liberia and were wholly exempt from taxation under the income tax law previously
in effect since 1977, and “resident” Liberian corporations which conduct business in Liberia and are, and were under the prior
law, subject to taxation. The New Act was amended by the Consolidated Tax Amendments Act of 2011 which was published and became effective
on November 1, 2011 (the “Amended Act”). The Amended Act specifically exempts from taxation non-resident Liberian corporations
such as our Liberian subsidiaries that engage in international shipping (and not exclusively in Liberia) and that do not engage in other
business or activities in Liberia other than as specifically enumerated in the Amended Act. In addition, the Amended Act made such exemption
from taxation retroactive to the effective date of the New Act.
United States Federal Income
Tax Considerations
The following discussion of United
States federal income tax matters is based on the Code, judicial decisions, administrative pronouncements, and existing and proposed regulations
issued by the United States Department of the Treasury as of the date hereof, all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive
effect. This discussion does not address any United States state or local taxes, any United States federal tax other than federal income
tax or the tax on net investment income imposed by Section 1411 of the Code. This discussion does not purport to address the tax consequences
of owning our stock to all categories of investors, some of which (such as financial institutions, regulated investment companies, real
estate investment trusts, tax-exempt organizations, insurance companies, United States expatriates, persons holding our stock as part
of a hedging, integrated, conversion or constructive sale transaction or a straddle, persons liable for alternative minimum tax, pass-through
entities and investors therein, persons who own, actually or under applicable constructive ownership rules, 10% or more of the vote or
value
of our stock, traders or dealers
in securities or currencies and United States holders whose functional currency is not the United States dollar) may be subject
to special rules. This discussion only addresses holders that hold the stock as a capital asset. This discussion is based upon
our beliefs and expectations concerning our past, current and anticipated activities, income and assets and those of our subsidiaries,
the direct, indirect and constructive ownership of our stock and the trading and quotation of our stock. Should any such beliefs
or expectations prove to be incorrect, the conclusions described herein could be adversely affected. You are encouraged to consult
your own tax advisors concerning the overall tax consequences of the ownership of our stock arising in your own particular situation
under United States federal, state, local or foreign law.
If a partnership holds our stock,
the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership.
Partners in a partnership holding our stock are encouraged to consult their tax advisors.
United States Federal Income
Tax Consequences
Taxation of Operating Income
in General
General
Unless exempt from United States
federal income taxation under the rules discussed below, a foreign corporation is subject to United States federal income taxation
in respect of any income that is derived from the use of vessels, from the hiring or leasing of vessels for use on a time, voyage
or bareboat charter basis, from the participation in a shipping pool, partnership, strategic alliance, joint operating agreement,
code sharing arrangements or other joint venture it directly or indirectly owns or participates in that generates such income,
or from the performance of services directly related to those uses, which we refer to as “shipping income”, to the
extent that the shipping income is derived from sources within the United States. For these purposes, 50% of the gross shipping
income that is attributable to transportation that begins or ends, but that does not both begin and end, in the United States,
exclusive of certain U.S. territories and possessions, constitutes income from sources within the United States, which we refer
to as “U.S. source gross shipping income”.
Shipping income attributable
to transportation that both begins and ends in the United States is considered to be 100% from sources within the United States.
We are prohibited by law from engaging in transportation that produces income considered to be 100% from sources within the United
States.
Shipping income attributable
to transportation exclusively between non-U.S. ports will be considered to be 100% derived from sources outside the United States.
Shipping income derived from sources outside the United States will not be subject to any United States federal income tax.
We are subject to a 4% tax imposed
without allowance for deductions for such taxable year, as described in “Taxation in the Absence of Exemption”, unless
we qualify for exemption from tax under Section 883 of the Code, the requirements of which are described in detail below. For our
2020 taxable year, we were exempt from U.S federal tax on our U.S. source gross shipping income.
Exemption of Operating Income
from United States Federal Income Taxation
Under Section 883 of the Code
and the regulations thereunder, we will be exempt from United States federal income taxation on our U.S.-source shipping income
if:
|
a) |
we are organized in a foreign country (our
“country of organization”) that grants an “equivalent exemption” to corporations organized in the
United States one of the following is true; and |
|
b) |
either: |
|
i) |
more than 50% of the value of our stock is owned, directly
or indirectly, by “qualified shareholders”, that are persons (i) who are “residents” of our
country of organization or of another foreign country that grants an “equivalent exemption” to corporations
organized in the United States, and (ii) we satisfy certain substantiation requirements, which
we refer to as the “50% Ownership Test”; or |
|
ii) |
our stock is “primarily” and “regularly” traded on one or more
established securities markets in our country of organization, in another country that grants an “equivalent exemption”
to United States corporations, or in the United States, which we refer to as the “Publicly-Traded Test”. |
The jurisdictions where we and
our shipowning subsidiaries are incorporated grant “equivalent exemptions” to United States corporations. Therefore,
we will be exempt from United States federal income taxation with respect to our U.S. source shipping income if we satisfy either
the 50% Ownership Test or the Publicly-Traded Test.
50% Ownership Test
Under the regulations, a foreign
corporation will satisfy the 50% Ownership Test for a taxable year if (i) for at least half of the number of days in the taxable
year, more than 50% of the value of its stock is owned, directly or constructively through the application of certain attribution
rules prescribed by the regulations, by one or more shareholders who are residents of foreign countries that grant “equivalent
exemption” to corporations organized in the United States and (ii) the foreign corporation satisfies certain substantiation
and reporting requirements with respect to such shareholders. Holders of warrants will not be treated as constructive owners of
shares for purposes of the 50% Ownership Test.
We satisfied the 50% Ownership
Test for our 2021 taxable year, and expect that we will be able to satisfy that test going forward.
Publicly-Traded Test
The regulations provide that
the stock of a foreign corporation will be considered to be “primarily traded” on an established securities market
in a country if the number of shares of each class of stock used to satisfy the Publicly Traded Test that is traded
during the taxable year on all
established securities markets in that country exceeds the number of shares in each such class that is traded during that year
on established securities markets in any other single country.
Under the regulations, the stock
of a foreign corporation will be considered “regularly traded” if one or more classes of its stock representing 50%
or more of its outstanding shares, by total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote and by total combined
value of all classes of stock, are listed on one or more established securities markets (such as the NYSE), which we refer to as
the “listing threshold”.
The regulations further require
that with respect to each class of stock relied upon to meet the listing threshold: (i) such class of the stock is traded on the
market, other than in minimal quantities, on at least sixty (60) days during the taxable year or one-sixth (1/6) of the days in
a short taxable year; and (ii) the aggregate number of shares of such class of stock traded on such market is at least 10% of the
average number of shares of such class of stock outstanding during such year or as appropriately adjusted in the case of a short
taxable year. Even if a foreign corporation does not satisfy both tests, the regulations provide that the trading frequency and
trading volume tests will be deemed satisfied by a class of stock if such class of stock is traded on an established market in
the United States and such class of stock is regularly quoted by dealers making a market in such stock.
Notwithstanding the foregoing,
the regulations provide, in pertinent part, that a class of stock will not be considered to be “regularly traded” on
an established securities market for any taxable year in which 50% or more of the vote and value of the outstanding shares of such
class of stock are owned, actually or constructively under specified attribution rules, on more than half the days during the taxable
year by persons who each own directly or indirectly 5% or more of the vote and value of such class of stock, whom we refer to as
“5% Shareholders”. We refer to this restriction in the regulations as the “Closely-Held Rule”.
For purposes of being able to
determine our 5% Shareholders, the regulations permit a foreign corporation to rely on Schedule 13G and Schedule 13D filings with
the Commission. The regulations further provide that an investment company that is registered under the Investment Company Act
of 1940, as amended, will not be treated as a 5% Shareholder for such purposes.
Additionally, holders of warrants will not be treated
as constructive owners of shares for purposes of the Closely Held Rule.
The Closely-Held Rule will not
disqualify a foreign corporation, however, if it can establish and substantiate that qualified shareholders own, actually or constructively
under specified attribution rules, sufficient shares in the closely-held block of stock to preclude the shares in the closely-held
block that are owned by non-qualified 5% Shareholders from representing 50% or more of the value of such class of stock for more
than half of the days during the tax year. An analysis of our shareholding in 2020 confirmed that we can satisfy that more than
50% of our shares were held for more than half of the days in the 2020 taxable year by qualified 5% Shareholders in combination
with the shares held by less than 5% shareholders.
Due to the factual nature of
the issues involved, there can be no assurance that we or any of our subsidiaries will qualify for the benefits of Section 883
of the Code for our subsequent taxable years.
Taxation in Absence of Exemption
To the extent the benefits of
Section 883 are unavailable, our U.S. source gross shipping income, to the extent not considered to be “effectively connected”
with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business, as described below, would be subject to a 4% tax imposed by Section 887 of the Code
on a gross basis, without the benefit of deductions, otherwise referred to as the “4% Tax”. Since under the sourcing
rules described above, no more than 50% of our shipping income would be treated as being derived from U.S. sources, the maximum
effective rate of U.S. federal income tax on our shipping income would never exceed 2% under the 4% Tax.
To the extent the benefits of
the Section 883 exemption are unavailable and our U.S. source gross shipping income is considered to be “effectively connected”
with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business, as described below, any such “effectively connected” U.S. source gross
shipping income, net of applicable deductions, would be subject to the U.S. federal corporate income tax currently imposed at a
rate of 21%. In addition, we may be subject to the 30% “branch profits” tax on earnings effectively connected with
the conduct of such trade or business, as determined after allowance for certain adjustments, and on certain interest paid or deemed
paid attributable to the conduct of our U.S. trade or business.
Our U.S. source gross shipping
income would be considered “effectively connected” with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business only if:
|
~ |
we have, or are considered to have, a fixed place of business in the United States involved
in the earning of shipping income; and |
|
~ |
substantially all of our U.S. source gross shipping income is attributable to regularly scheduled
transportation, such as the operation of a vessel that follows a published schedule with repeated sailings at regular intervals
between the same points for voyages that begin or end in the United States, or, in the case of income from the leasing of
a vessel, is attributable to a fixed place of business in the United States. |
We do not intend to have, or
permit circumstances that would result in having, any vessel operating to the United States on a regularly scheduled basis, or
earning income from the leasing of a vessel attributable to a fixed place of business in the United States. Based on the foregoing
and on the expected mode of our shipping operations and other activities, we believe that none of our U.S. source gross shipping
income will be “effectively connected” with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business.
Taxation of Gain on Sale of Assets
Regardless of whether we qualify
for the exemption under Section 883 of the Code, we will not be subject to United States income taxation with respect to gain realized
on a sale of a vessel, provided the sale is considered to occur outside of the United States (as determined under United States
tax principles). In general, a sale of a vessel will be considered to occur outside of the United
States for this purpose if title
to the vessel (and risk of loss with respect to the vessel) passes to the buyer outside of the United States. We expect that any
sale of a vessel will be so structured that it will be considered to occur outside of the United States.
United States Federal Income
Taxation of United States Holders
You are a “United States
holder” if you are a beneficial owner of our stock and you are a United States citizen or resident, a United States corporation
(or other United States entity taxable as a corporation), an estate the income of which is subject to United States federal income
taxation regardless of its source, or a trust if a court within the United States is able to exercise primary jurisdiction over
the administration of the trust and one or more United States persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of
that trust.
Distributions on Our Stock
Subject to the discussion of
PFICs (as defined below), any distributions with respect to our stock that you receive from us, other than distributions in liquidation
and distributions in redemption of our stock that are treated as exchanges, will generally constitute dividends, which may be taxable
as ordinary income or “qualified dividend income” as described below, to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings
and profits (as determined under United States tax principles). Distributions in excess of our earnings and profits will be treated
first as a nontaxable return of capital to the extent of your tax basis in our stock (on a dollar-for-dollar basis) and thereafter
as capital gain. Because we do not intend to determine our earnings and profits on the basis of United States federal income tax
principles, any distribution paid will generally be reported as a “dividend” for United States federal income tax purposes.
Because we are not a United States
corporation, if you are a United States corporation (or a United States entity taxable as a corporation), you will not be entitled
to claim a dividends-received deduction with respect to any distributions you receive from us.
Dividends paid with respect to
our stock will generally be treated as “passive category income” for purposes of computing allowable foreign tax credits
for United States foreign tax credit purposes.
If you are an individual, trust
or estate, dividends you receive from us should be treated as “qualified dividend income” taxed at preferential rates,
provided that:
|
(a) |
the Common Stock or Preferred Shares on which the dividends are paid are readily tradable
on an established securities market in the United States (such as the NYSE); |
|
(b) |
we are not a PFIC for the taxable year during which the dividend is paid or the immediately
preceding taxable year (see the discussion below under “—PFIC Status”); |
|
(c) |
you own our stock for more than (x) in the cases where the dividends on the Preferred Shares
are attributable to a period or periods aggregating in excess of 366 days, 90 days in the 181-day period beginning 90 days
before the date on which the Preferred Shares become ex-dividend or (y) in all other cases, 60 days in the 121-day period
beginning 60 days before the date on which the stock becomes ex-dividend; |
|
(d) |
you are not under an obligation to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially
similar or related property; and |
|
(e) |
certain other conditions are met. |
Special rules may apply to any
“extraordinary dividend.” Generally, an extraordinary dividend is: (i) a dividend in an amount that is equal to (or
in excess of) (x) 10%, in the case of Common Stock, or (y) 5%, in the case of the Preferred Shares, of your adjusted tax basis
in (or the fair market value of, in certain circumstances) a share of our stock or (ii) dividends received within a one-year period
that, in the aggregate, equal or exceed 20% of your adjusted tax basis in (or fair market value of in certain circumstances) a
share of our stock. If we pay an “extraordinary dividend” on our stock that is treated as “qualified dividend
income” and if you are an individual, estate or trust, then any loss you derive from a subsequent sale or exchange of such
stock will be treated as long-term capital loss to the extent of such dividend.
There is no assurance that dividends
you receive from us will be eligible for preferential rates. Dividends you receive from us that are not eligible for any preferential
rate will be taxed at the ordinary income rates.
Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition
of Stock
Provided that we are not a PFIC
for any taxable year and except as provided in the discussion under “Redemption of Stock,” you generally will recognize
taxable gain or loss upon a sale, exchange or other disposition of our stock, in an amount equal to the difference between the
amount realized by you from such sale, exchange or other disposition and your tax basis in such stock. Such gain or loss will be
treated as long-term capital gain or loss if your holding period is greater than one year at the time of the sale, exchange or
other disposition. Such capital gain or loss will generally be treated as United States source income or loss, as applicable, for
United States foreign tax credit purposes. Your ability to deduct capital losses against ordinary income is subject to limitations.
Redemption of Stock
In the case of a redemption of
stock (including a disposition of stock to us or persons related to us), unless the redemption satisfies one of the tests set forth
in Section 302(b) of the Code for treating the redemption as a sale or exchange, the redemption will be treated under Section 302
of the Code as a distribution. If the redemption is treated as a sale or exchange of the United States holder’s stock, the
United States holder’s treatment will be as discussed above in “—Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of Stock.”
The redemption will be treated as a sale or exchange only if it (i) is “substantially disproportionate,” (ii) constitutes
a “complete termination of the holder’s stock interest” in us or (iii) is not “essentially equivalent to
a dividend,” each within the meaning of Section 302(b) of the Code. In determining whether any of the alternative tests of
Section 302(b) of the Code is met, shares of our capital stock actually owned, as well as shares considered to be owned by the
United States holder by reason of
certain constructive ownership
rules, must be taken into account. Because the determination as to whether any of the alternative tests of Section 302(b) of the
Code is satisfied with respect to a particular holder of the stock will depend on that holder’s particular facts and circumstances
as of the time the determination is made, United States holders should consult their own tax advisors to determine their tax treatment
of a redemption of stock in light of their own particular investment circumstances.
PFIC Status
Special United States income
tax rules apply to you if you hold stock in a non-United States corporation that is classified as a “passive foreign
investment company” (or “PFIC”) for United States income tax purposes. In general, we will be treated as a PFIC in
any taxable year in which, after applying certain look-through rules, either:
|
(a) |
at least 75% of our gross income for such taxable year consists of “passive income”
(e.g., dividends, interest, capital gains and rents derived other than in the active conduct of a rental business); or |
|
(b) |
at least 50% of the average value of our assets during such taxable year consists of “passive
assets” (i.e., assets that produce, or are held for the production of, passive income). |
For purposes of determining whether
we are a PFIC, we will be treated as earning and owning our proportionate share of the income and assets, respectively, of any
of our subsidiary corporations in which we own at least 25% of the value of the subsidiary’s stock. Income we earn, or are
deemed to earn, in connection with the performance of services will not constitute passive income. By contrast, rental income will
generally constitute passive income (unless we are treated under certain special rules as deriving our rental income in the active
conduct of a trade or business).
Because we have chartered all
of our vessels to unrelated charterers on the basis of period time and spot time charter contracts (and not on the basis of bareboat
charters) and because we expect to continue to do so, we believe that currently we should not be treated as being and should not
become a PFIC. We believe it is more likely than not that our gross income derived from our time charter activities constitutes
active service income (as opposed to passive rental income) and, as a result, our vessels constitute active assets (as opposed
to passive assets) for purposes of determining whether we are a PFIC. We believe there is legal authority supporting this position,
consisting of case law and United States Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) pronouncements concerning the characterization
of income derived from time charters as service income for other tax purposes. However, there is no legal authority specifically
relating to the statutory provisions governing PFICs or relating to circumstances substantially similar to ours. Moreover, in Tidewater
Inc. v. United States, 565 F.3d 299 (5th Cir. 2009), the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that, contrary
to the position of the IRS in that case, and for purposes of a different set of rules under the Code, income received under a time
charter of vessels should be treated as rental income rather than services income. If the reasoning of the Fifth Circuit case were
extended to the PFIC context, the gross income we derive or are deemed to derive from our time chartering activities would be treated
as rental income, and we would probably be a PFIC. The IRS has stated that it disagrees with the holding in Tidewater and has specified
that income from period time charters should be treated as services income. However, the IRS’ statement with respect to the
Tidewater decision was an administrative action that cannot be relied upon or otherwise cited as precedent by taxpayers.
We have not sought, and we do
not expect to seek, an IRS ruling on this matter. As a result, the IRS or a court could disagree with our position that we are
not currently a PFIC. No assurance can be given that this result will not occur. In addition, although we intend to conduct our
affairs in a manner to avoid, to the extent possible, being classified as a PFIC with respect to any taxable year, we cannot assure
you that the nature of our operations will not change in the future, or that we can avoid PFIC status in the future.
As discussed below, if we were
to be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year, you generally would be subject to one of three different United States income tax
regimes, depending on whether or not you make certain elections. Additionally, you would be required to file annual information
returns with the IRS.
Taxation of United States Holders
That Make a Timely QEF Election
If we were treated as a PFIC,
and if you make a timely election to treat us as a “Qualified Electing Fund” for United States tax purposes (a “QEF
Election”), you would be required to report each year your allocable share of our ordinary earnings and our net capital gain
for our taxable year that ends with or within your taxable year, regardless of whether we make any distributions to you. Such income
inclusions would not be eligible for the preferential tax rates applicable to “qualified dividend income.” Your adjusted
tax basis in our stock would be increased to reflect such taxed but undistributed earnings and profits. Distributions of earnings
and profits that had previously been taxed would result in a corresponding reduction in your adjusted tax basis in our stock and
would not be taxed again once distributed. You would generally recognize capital gain or loss on the sale, exchange or other disposition
of our stock. Even if you make a QEF Election for one of our taxable years, if we were a PFIC for a prior taxable year during which
you held our stock and for which you did not make a timely QEF Election, you would also be subject to the more adverse rules described
below under “—Taxation of United States Holders That Make No Election.”
You would make a QEF Election with respect
to any year that our company is treated as a PFIC by completing and filing IRS Form 8621 with your United States income tax return
in accordance with the relevant instructions. If we were to become aware that we were to be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year,
we would notify all United States holders of such treatment and would provide all necessary information to any United States holder
who requests such information in order to make the QEF election described above.
Taxation of United States Holders
That Make a Timely “Mark-to-Market” Election
Alternatively, if we were to
be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year and, as we expect, our stock is treated as “marketable stock,” you would
be allowed to make a “mark-to-market” election with respect to our stock, provided that you complete and file IRS Form
8621 in accordance with the relevant instructions. If that election is made, you generally would include as ordinary income in
each taxable year the excess, if any, of the fair market value of our stock at the end of the taxable year over your adjusted tax
basis
in our stock. You also would
be permitted an ordinary loss in respect of the excess, if any, of your adjusted tax basis in our stock over its fair market value
at the end of the taxable year (but only to the extent of the net amount previously included in income as a result of the mark-to-market
election). Your tax basis in our stock would be adjusted to reflect any such income or loss amount. Gain realized on the sale,
exchange or other disposition of our stock would be treated as ordinary income, and any loss realized on the sale, exchange or
other disposition of the stock would be treated as ordinary loss to the extent that such loss does not exceed the net mark-to-market
gains previously included by you.
Taxation of United States Holders
That Make No Election
Finally, if we were treated as
a PFIC for any taxable year and if you did not make either a QEF Election or a “mark-to-market” election for that year,
you would be subject to special rules with respect to (a) any excess distribution (that is, the portion of any distributions received
by you on our stock in a taxable year in excess of 125% of the average annual distributions received by you in the three preceding
taxable years, or, if shorter, your holding period for our stock) and (b) any gain realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition
of our stock. Under these special rules:
|
(1) |
the excess distribution or gain would be allocated ratably over your aggregate holding period for our Common Stock; |
|
(2) |
the amount allocated to the current taxable year would be taxed as ordinary income; and |
|
(3) |
the amount allocated to each of the other taxable years would be subject to tax at the highest rate of tax in effect for the applicable class of taxpayer for that year, and an interest charge for the deemed deferral benefit would be imposed with respect to the resulting tax attributable to each such other taxable year. |
If an individual dies while owning
our stock, the individual’s successor generally would not receive a step-up in tax basis with respect to such stock for United
States tax purposes.
United States Federal Income
Taxation of Non-United States Holders
You are a “non-United States
holder” if you are a beneficial owner of our stock (other than a partnership for United States tax purposes) and you are
not a United States holder.
Distributions on Our Stock
You generally will not be subject
to United States income or withholding taxes on dividends you receive from us with respect to our stock, unless that income is
effectively connected with your conduct of a trade or business in the United States. If you are entitled to the benefits of an
applicable income tax treaty with respect to those dividends, that income generally is taxable in the United States only if it
is attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by you in the United States.
Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition
of Our Stock
You generally will not be subject
to United States income tax or withholding tax on any gain realized upon the sale, exchange or other disposition of our stock,
unless:
|
(a) |
the gain is effectively connected with your conduct of a trade
or business in the United States. If you are entitled to the benefits of an applicable income tax treaty with respect to that
gain, that gain generally is taxable in the United States only if it is attributable to a permanent establishment maintained
by you in the United States; or |
|
(b) |
you are an individual who is present in the United States for
183 days or more during the taxable year of disposition and certain other conditions are met. |
If you are engaged in a United
States trade or business for United States tax purposes, you will be subject to United States tax with respect to your income from
our stock (including dividends and the gain from the sale, exchange or other disposition of the stock) that is effectively connected
with the conduct of that trade or business in the same manner as if you were a United States holder. In addition, if you are a
corporate non-United States holder, your earnings and profits that are attributable to the effectively connected income (subject
to certain adjustments) may be subject to an additional United States branch profits tax at a rate of 30%, or at a lower rate as
may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty.
United States Backup Withholding
and Information Reporting
In general, if you are a non-corporate
United States holder, dividend payments (or other taxable distributions) made within the United States will be subject to information
reporting requirements and backup withholding tax if you:
|
(1) |
fail to provide an accurate taxpayer identification number; |
|
(2) |
are notified by the IRS that you are subject to backup withholding; or |
|
(3) |
in certain circumstances, fail to comply with applicable certification requirements. |
United States holders who are
individuals generally will be required to report certain information with respect to an interest in our stock by attaching a completed
IRS Form 8938, Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets, with their tax return for each year in which they hold an interest
in our stock. These requirements are subject to exceptions, including an exception for shares held in accounts maintained by certain
financial institutions and an exception applicable if the aggregate value of all “specified foreign financial assets”
(as defined in the Code) held by the United States holder (and, as applicable, by his or her spouse) does not exceed a specified
minimum amount.
If you are a non-United States
holder, you may be required to establish your exemption from information reporting and backup withholding by certifying your status
on IRS Form W-8BEN, W-8BEN-E, W-8ECI or W-8IMY, as applicable. If you sell our stock to or through a United States office or broker,
the payment of the sales proceeds is subject to both United States backup withholding and information reporting unless you certify
that you are a non-United States person, under penalties of perjury, or you otherwise establish an exemption. If you sell our stock
through a non-United States office of a non-United States broker and the sales proceeds are paid to you outside the United States,
then information reporting and backup withholding generally will not apply to
that payment. However, United
States information reporting requirements (but not backup withholding) will apply to a payment of sales proceeds, even if that
payment is made outside the United States, if you sell our stock through a non-United States office of a broker that is a United
States person or has certain other connections with the United States.
Backup withholding tax is not
an additional tax. Rather, you generally may obtain a refund of any amounts withheld under backup withholding rules that exceed
your income tax liability by accurately completing and timely filing a refund claim with the IRS. You should consult your own tax
advisor regarding the application of the backup withholding and information reporting rules.
F. Dividends and Paying
Agents |
Not applicable. |
|
G. Statement by Experts |
Not applicable. |
|
H. Documents on Display |
We are subject to the informational
requirements of the Exchange Act. In accordance with these requirements, we file reports and other information as a foreign private
issuer with the SEC. You may inspect reports and other information regarding registrants, such as us, that file electronically
with the SEC without charge at a web site maintained by the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.
I. Subsidiary Information |
Not applicable. |
PART
II |
|
ITEM 11.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
|
A. Quantitative
Information About Market Risk |
Interest Rate Risk
We are subject to market risks
relating to changes in interest rates because we have floating rate debt outstanding, which is based on U.S. dollar LIBOR or SOFR
plus, in the case of each credit facility, a specified margin. Our objective is to manage the impact of interest rate changes on
our earnings and cash flow in relation to our borrowings and to this effect, when we deem appropriate, we use derivative financial
instruments.
The total notional principal
amount of outstanding interest rate derivative contracts as of December 31, 2021 was $300.0 million. The swaps had specified rates
and durations. In January 2022 we terminated certain of these interest rate derivative contracts for which we received an aggregate
payment of $8.34 million and entered into new contracts with shorter maturities. In February 2022, we terminated all outstanding
interest rate derivative contracts transactions and received an aggregate payment of $2.78 million. We did not have any interest
rate derivative contracts outstanding as of December 31, 2022. From time to time we may enter into interest rate swap agreements
in order to manage future interest costs and the risk associated with changing interest rates. Refer to the table in Note 14 of
the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report which summarizes the interest rate swaps in place
as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021.
The following table sets forth
the sensitivity of our existing loans as of December 31, 2022, as to a 100 basis point increase in LIBOR and SOFR, and reflects
the additional interest expense.
Year |
|
|
Amount |
2023 |
$ |
2.2 |
|
million |
2024 |
|
2.0 |
|
million |
2025 |
|
1.6 |
|
million |
2026 |
|
1.1 |
|
million |
2027 |
|
0.9 |
|
million |
Freight Derivatives and Bunker
Swaps
We are subject to markets risks
relating to changes in charter rates because we have entered into a certain number of FFA’s on the Panamax index maturing
in 2024. Generally freight derivatives may be used to hedge a vessel owner’s exposure to the charter market for a specified
vessel size and period of time. Upon settlement, if the contracted charter rate is less than the average of the rates reported
on an identified index for the specified vessel size and time period, the seller of the FFA is required to pay the buyer the settlement
sum, being an amount equal to the difference between the contracted rate and the settlement rate, multiplied by the number of days
of the specified period. Conversely, if the contracted rate is greater than the settlement rate, the buyer is required to pay the
seller the settlement sum. If we take positions in FFAs or other derivative instruments we could suffer losses in the settling
or termination of these agreements. This could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flow.
Our FFA derivatives do not qualify
as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes and therefore gains or losses are recognized in earnings. For the year ended December
31, 2021, we incurred net losses on FFAs of $3.2 million whereas for the year ended December 31, 2022, we incurred net gains of
$7.1 million. As of December 31, 2021 and 2022 the fair value of our outstanding FFA derivatives was a net asset of $1.0 million
and an asset of $0.8, respectively.
A hypothetical 10.0% immediate
and uniform increase in all charter rates from the rates in effect as of December 31, 2022, would have decreased our gain and the
fair value of our outstanding FFA derivatives by approximately $0.2 million, resulting to FFA derivatives asset of $0.6 million.
We are also subject to markets
risks relating to changes in the prices of bunkers prices because we have entered into a certain number of bunker swap contracts
to manage our exposure to fluctuations of bunker price differentials associated with the consumption of bunkers by our vessels.
Bunker swaps are agreements between two parties to exchange cash flows at a fixed price on bunkers, where volume, time period and
price are agreed in advance. If we take positions in bunker swaps or other derivative instruments we could suffer losses in the
settling or termination of these agreements. This could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flow.
We used these bunker swaps as
an economic hedge to reduce the risk on bunker price differentials. Our bunker swaps do not qualify as cash flow hedges for accounting
purposes and therefore gains or losses are recognized in earnings. Bunker swaps are treated as assets/liabilities until they are
settled. During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2022, we entered into a number of bunker swaps. For the years ended December
31, 2021 and 2022, we incurred net losses of $1.0 million and $4.5 million respectively. As of December 31, 2021 and 2022, the
fair value of our outstanding bunker swaps was a net liability of $0.2 million and an asset of $0.3 million, respectively.
A hypothetical 10.0% immediate
and uniform increase in all bunker prices from the prices in effect as of December 31, 2022, would have increased our loss and
decreased the fair value of our outstanding bunker swaps by approximately $0.1 million, resulting to bunker swaps derivatives asset
of $0.2 million
Foreign Currency Exchange
Risk
We generate all of our revenues
in U.S. dollars, but for the year ended December 31, 2022 we incurred approximately 26.6% of our vessel operating expenses in currencies
other than the U.S. dollar and the vast majority of our management fees to our Managers in currencies other than the U.S. dollar.
The interest on our €100,00 million bond is also payable in EUR. As of December 31, 2022, approximately 31.6% of our outstanding
accounts payable were denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar and were subject to exchange rate risk, as their value
fluctuates with changes in exchange rates.
A hypothetical 10.0% immediate
and uniform adverse move in all currency exchange rates from the rates in effect as of December 31, 2022, would have increased
our vessel operating expenses by approximately $2.1 million, our management fees to our Managers by approximately $1.8 million,
our bond interest by approximately $0.3 million and the fair value of our outstanding accounts payable by approximately $0.3 million.
As of December 31, 2022, the
majority of our outstanding contractual obligations to our Managers were denominated in Euros, equivalent to $91.9 million. The
USD equivalent of the €100.0 million bond as of December 31, 2022 was $107.0 million. In order to mitigate the risk from exchange
rate fluctuations, we have entered into four currency forward agreements in the relation to the redemption of the bond for a total
of €40.0 million at an average rate of 1.0846 EUR/USD. A hypothetical 10% immediate adverse move in the Euro exchange rate
from the rate in effect as of December 31, 2022, would have increased our outstanding contractual obligations to our Managers by
approximately $9.2 million and to the bond holders by approximately $7.7 million, taking into account the outstanding forward currency
agreements. We may not enter into additional foreign exchange forward agreements in the future in relation to the expenditures
denominated in Euros.
ITEM
12.
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES |
Not applicable. |
|
ITEM 13.
DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES |
None. |
|
ITEM 14.
MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
|
A. Material
Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders |
We adopted a shareholder rights
plan on August 6, 2020, that authorizes the issuance to our existing shareholders of preferred share rights and additional shares
of Common Stock if any third party seeks to acquire control of a substantial block of our Common Stock. See “Item 10. Additional
Information—B. Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws—Shareholder Rights Plan” included in this annual report for
a description of the shareholders rights plan.
ITEM
15.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
|
A. Disclosure
Controls and Procedures |
Our management, with the participation
of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of December 31, 2022.
Disclosure controls and procedures are defined under SEC rules as controls and other
procedures that are designed
to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within required time periods. Disclosure controls and procedures include without
limitation controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that
it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal
executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures,
including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even
effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based
on our evaluation, the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of December 31, 2022.
B. Management’s Annual Report on Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting |
Our management is responsible
for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)
under the Exchange Act and for the assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control
over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal
financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the Company’s board of directors, management
and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
A company’s internal control
over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit the preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S.
GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections
of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes
in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In making its assessment of our
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, management, including the chief executive officer and chief
financial officer, used the criteria set forth in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission of 2013 (“COSO”).
Management concluded that, as
of December 31, 2022, our internal control over financial reporting was effective. Deloitte Certified Public Accountants S.A. (“Deloitte”),
our independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the financial statements included herein and our internal control
over financial reporting and has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2022 which is reproduced in its entirety in Item 15(c) below.
C. Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm |
The effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022 has been audited by Deloitte Certified Public Accountants S.A.,
an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears below.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and the Board
of Directors of
Safe Bulkers, Inc.
Majuro, Republic of the Marshall
Islands
Opinion on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting
We have audited the
internal control over financial reporting of Safe Bulkers, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December
31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal
Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022, of the Company and our report dated March 6, 2023, expressed an unqualified
opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management
is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying “Management’s Annual Report on Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting.” Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be indepen-
dent with respect to the Company
in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance
with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining
an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures
as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control
over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance
with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations,
internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness
to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Deloitte Certified Public
Accountants S.A.
Athens, Greece
March 6, 2023
D. Changes in Internal Control over Financial
Reporting |
During the period covered by
this annual report, we have made no changes to our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected or are
reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 16.
[RESERVED] |
|
ITEM 16A.
AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT |
Our Audit Committee consists
of three independent directors, Ole Wikborg, Christos Megalou and Frank Sica, who is the chairman of the committee. Our board of
directors has determined that Frank Sica, whose biographical details are included in “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management
and Employees—A. Directors and Senior Management,” qualifies as an audit committee “financial expert,”
as such term is defined in Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC.
We have adopted a Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics for all officers and employees of our company, which incorporates a Code of Ethics for directors and a Code
of Conduct for corporate officers, a copy of which is posted on our website, and may be viewed at http://www.safebulkers.com/corp_ethics.htm.
We will also provide a paper copy of this document free of charge upon written request by our shareholders. shareholders may direct
their requests to the attention of Dr. Loukas Barmparis, Secretary, Safe Bulkers, Inc., e-mail: directors@safebulkers.com, telephone:
+30 2111 888 400, +357 25 887 200. No waivers of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics have been granted to any person during
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.
ITEM 16C.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES |
Aggregate fees billed to the
Company for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 by the Company’s principal accounting firm, Deloitte Certified
Public Accountants S.A., (PCAOB number 1163), an independent registered public accounting firm and member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu,
Limited, by the category of service, were as follows:
| |
2021 | | |
2022 | |
| |
(in thousands) | |
Audit fees | |
$ | 455 | | |
$ | 370 | |
Audit related fees | |
$ | 84 | | |
$ | 47 | |
All other fees | |
$ | 6 | | |
$ | — | |
Total fees | |
$ | 545 | | |
$ | 417 | |
Audit fees represent compensation
for professional services rendered for the integrated audit of the consolidated financial statements of the Company and for the
review of the quarterly financial information as well as in connection with the review of the Annual Report, review of registration
statements and related consents and comfort letters and any other audit services required for SEC or other regulatory fillings.
Audit related fees represent compensation for professional services rendered relating to the review of the prospectus and related
services for the public offering and listing on the Athens Stock Exchange of unsecured bond by a subsidiary of Safe Bulkers, and
subscription services. There were no fees relating to Tax fees. Other fees represent fee for professional services rendered in
connection with assistance provided with the Company’s cyber security assessment, including cyber awareness training.
Pre-approval Policies and Procedures
The audit committee charter sets
forth our policy regarding retention of the independent auditors, giving the audit committee responsibility for the appointment,
compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the independent auditors. The audit committee charter provides that the committee
is responsible for reviewing and approving in advance the retention of the independent auditors for the performance of all audit
and lawfully permitted non-audit services. The chairman of the audit committee or in the absence of the chairman, any member of
the audit committee designated by the chairman, has authority to approve in advance any lawfully permitted non-audit services and
fees. The audit committee is authorized to establish other policies and procedures for the pre-approval of such services and fees.
Where non-audit services and fees are approved under delegated authority, the action must be reported to the full audit committee
at its next regularly scheduled meeting.
ITEM
16D.
EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES |
Not Applicable. |
|
ITEM 16E.
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS |
Preferred Stock
In March 2022, the Company issued
a notice of redemption of 1,492,554 of the outstanding Series C Preferred Shares. The redemption was completed on April 29, 2022,
at a redemption price of $25.00 per Series C Preferred Share plus all accumulated and unpaid dividends to, but excluding, the redemption
date. Following the redemption, there were 804,950 Series C Preferred Shares outstanding, as of December 31, 2022.
Common Stock
In June 2019, the Company implemented
a new program for the repurchase of an amount of up to 5,000,000 shares of its common stock. In March 2020, we expanded such share
repurchase program to provide for the repurchase of an additional 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock on the open market. Any such
purchases were made in the open market in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. All 6,126,579 shares of Common Stock
repurchased under this program were canceled. The program expired in June 2020.
The Company did not purchase
any of the Company’s equity securities during calendar year 2021.
In June 2022, the Company authorized
and implemented a new program under which it may from time to time purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of its common stock. As of February 24,
2023, 2,807,418 shares of common stock had been repurchased. Any such purchases were made in the open market in compliance with
applicable laws and regulations. All shares of Common Stock repurchased under the program were canceled. The repurchase program
is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2023 or upon the repurchase of an amount of up to 5,000,000 shares of its common stock.
Details on the shares purchased
under such program as of February 24, 2023, are set forth in the table below:
Period |
|
Total Number of Shares
of Common Stock
Purchased (a) |
|
Average Price Paid
per Share
of Common Stock |
|
|
|
Total Number of Common Shares
Purchased as Part of Publicly
Announced Plan or Programs |
June 2022 |
|
930,729 |
|
|
|
3.85 |
|
930,729 |
July 2022 |
|
69,271 |
|
|
|
3.85 |
|
1,000,000 |
August 2022 |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
September 2022 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
3.15 |
|
2,000,000 |
October 2022 |
|
807,418 |
|
|
|
2.47 |
|
2,807,418 |
November 2022 |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
December 2022 |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
Total |
|
2,807,418 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
2,807,418 |
January 2023 |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
February 2023 |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
March 2023 |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
Total |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
Total 2022 & 2023 |
|
2,807,418 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
2,807,418 |
(a) |
All purchases were made on the open market in accordance with Rule 10b-18 and Rule
10b5-1 under the Exchange Act. |
ITEM
16F.
CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT |
Not Applicable. |
|
ITEM 16G.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Statement of Significant
Differences Between our Corporate Governance Practices and the NYSE Corporate Governance Standards for U.S. Non-Controlled Issuers
Overview
Pursuant to certain exceptions
for foreign private issuers, we are not required to comply with certain of the corporate governance practices followed by U.S.
companies under the NYSE listing standards. However, pursuant to Section 303.A.11 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual and the requirements
of Form 20-F, we are required to state any significant differences between our corporate governance practices and the practices
required by the NYSE. We believe that our established practices in the area of corporate governance are in line with the spirit
of the NYSE standards and provide adequate protection to our shareholders. For example, our audit committee consists solely of
independent directors. The significant differences between our corporate governance practices and the NYSE standards applicable
to listed U.S. companies are set forth below.
Independent Directors
The NYSE requires that listed
companies have a majority of independent directors. As permitted under Marshall Islands law and our bylaws, our board of directors
consists of a majority of non-independent directors.
Executive Sessions
The NYSE requires that non-management
directors meet regularly in executive sessions without management. The NYSE also requires that all independent directors meet in
an executive session at least once a year. As permitted under Marshall Islands law and our bylaws, our non-management directors
do not regularly hold executive sessions without management and we do not expect them to do so.
Corporate Governance, Nominating
and Compensation Committee
The NYSE requires that a listed
U.S. company have a nominating/corporate governance committee and a compensation committee, each composed of independent directors.
As permitted under Marshall Islands law and our bylaws, we have a combined corporate governance, nominating and compensation committee,
which at present is comprised solely of independent directors.
Shareholder Approval Requirements
The NYSE requires that a listed
U.S. company obtain prior shareholder approval for certain issuances of authorized stock or the approval of, and material revisions
to, equity compensation plans. However, as permitted under Marshall Islands law, we do not need to obtain prior shareholder approval
in connection with such issuances or equity compensation plans.
|
ITEM
16H.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE |
Not Applicable. |
|
ITEM
16I.
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS |
Not Applicable. |
|
ITEM
17.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
Not Applicable. |
|
ITEM
18.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
Reference is made to pages F-1 through
F-37 incorporated herein by reference. |
|
ITEM
19.
EXHIBITS |
Exhibit |
Description |
1.1 |
First Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 on the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (Reg. No.
333-150995)) |
1.2 |
Articles of Amendment of First Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 99.1 on the Company’s Form 6-K, filed on October 8,
2009) |
1.3 |
First Amended and Restated Bylaws (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 on the
Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (Reg. No. 333-150995)) |
2.1 |
Form of Registration Rights Agreement between Safe Bulkers, Inc. and Vorini Holdings
Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 on the Company’s Registration
Statement on Form F-1 (Reg. No. 333-150995)) |
2.2 |
Shareholders Rights Agreement, dated August 5, 2020, between Safe Bulkers, Inc. and
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 on the Company’s Form 6-K, filed
on August 6, 2021) |
2.3 |
Specimen Share Certificate (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 on the Company’s
Registration Statement on Form F-1 (Reg. No. 333-150995)) |
2.4 |
Statement of Designation of the 8.00% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred
Shares (Par Value $0.01 Per Share) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 on
the Company’s Form 8-A12B filed on May 7, 2014) |
2.5 |
Statement of Designation of the 8.00% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred
Shares (Par Value $0.01 Per Share) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 on
the Company’s Form 8-A12B filed on June 30, 2014) |
2.6 |
Statement
of Designation of Rights, Preferences and Privileges of Series A Participating Preferred Stock (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.1 on the Company’s Form 6-K, filed on August 6, 2021) |
2.7 |
Description of Securities |
4.1 |
Management Agreement, dated May 29, 2018, between Safety Management Overseas S.A. and
Safe Bulkers, Inc. |
4.2 |
Management Agreement, dated May 29, 2018, between Safe Bulkers Management Limited and
Safe Bulkers, Inc. |
4.3 |
Second
Amended and Restated Restrictive Covenant Agreement, dated August 2, 2017, among Safe Bulkers, Inc.,
Polys Hajioannou, Vorini Holdings Inc. and Machairiotissa Holdings Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 on the Company’s
Form 20-F, filed on March 2, 2018) |
4.4 |
Second Amended and Restated Restrictive Covenant Agreement, dated August 2, 2017, between
Safe Bulkers, Inc. and Polys Hajioannou (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.4 on the Company’s Form 20-F, filed on March 2, 2018) |
Exhibit |
Description |
4.5 |
Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated October 3, 2018, by and among Safe Bulkers,
Inc., DNB Bank ASA, as Mandated Lead Arranger, DNB Bank ASA, as Agent, DNB Bank
ASA, as Swap Provider, and DNB Bank ASA, as Security Agent |
4.6 |
Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated March 28, 2019, by and among Safe Bulkers,
Inc., DNB Bank ASA, as Mandated Lead Arranger, DNB Bank ASA, as Agent, DNB Bank
ASA, as Swap Provider, and DNB Bank ASA, as Security Agent |
4.7 |
At-The-Market Equity Offering Sales Agreement between Safe Bulkers, Inc. and DNB Markets,
Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 on the Company’s Form 6-K,
filed on August 7, 2020) |
4.8 |
Amendment No. 1 to the At-the-Market Equity Offering Sales Agreement, dated as of May
26, 2021, by and between Safe Bulkers, Inc. and DNB Markets, Inc. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 1.1 on the Company’s Form 6-K, filed on May 27, 2021) |
4.9 |
Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated September 27, 2021, by and among Safe Bulkers,
Inc., DNB Bank ASA, as Mandated Lead Arranger, DNB Bank ASA, as Agent, DNB Bank ASA,
as Swap Provider, and DNB Bank ASA, as Security Agent |
4.10 |
Indenture dated February 11, 2022, with respect to Safe Bulkers Participations Plc
€100mm bond due 2027 with semi-annual coupon of 2.95% p.a., with Safe Bulkers,
Inc. as guarantor |
4.11 |
Restated Restrictive Covenant Agreement dated October 4, 2022among Safe Bulkers, Inc.,
Polys Hajioannou, Vorini Holdings Inc. and Machairiotissa Holdings Inc. |
4.12 |
Restrictive Covenant Agreement dated October 4, 2022, between Safe Bulkers, Inc. and
Polys Hajioannou. |
4.13 |
Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated September 27, 2021, by and among Safe Bulkers,
Inc., DNB Bank ASA, as Mandated Lead Arranger, DNB Bank ASA, as Agent, DNB Bank ASA,
as Swap Provider, and DNB Bank ASA, as Security Agent |
4.14 |
Management Agreement between Safe Bulkers Management Monaco Inc. and Safe Bulkers,
Inc. dated April 1 2022 |
4.15 |
Amended Management Agreement between Safe Bulkers Management Limited and Safe Bulkers,
Inc. dated April 1 2022 |
4.16 |
Amended Management Agreement between Safety Management Overseas S.A. and Safe Bulkers,
Inc. dated April 1 2022 |
8.1 |
List of Subsidiaries |
12.1 |
Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended |
12.2 |
Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended |
13.1 |
Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
13.2 |
Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
15.1 |
Consent of Deloitte Certified Public Accountants S.A. |
101 |
The
following materials from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, formatted
in lnline eXtensible Business Reporting Language (iXBRL): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets
as of December 31, 2021 and 2022; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December
31, 2020, 2021 and 2022; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended
December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December
31, 2020, 2021 and 2022; and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
The registrant hereby certifies
that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign
this annual report on its behalf.
By: /s/ KONSTANTINOS
ADAMOPOULOS
March 6, 2023
Name: Konstantinos Adamopoulos
Title: Chief Financial
Officer and Director |
Index to financial
statements
|
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
|
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of
Safe Bulkers, Inc.
Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands. |
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets of Safe Bulkers Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022,
and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results
of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 6, 2023, expressed an unqualified opinion on
the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits.
We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance
with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the
PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards
of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess
the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond
to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a
matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to
the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved
our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any
way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below,
providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Long -lived Assets – Future Charter Rates
– Refer to Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements.
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company’s evaluation of its vessels for
impairment involves an initial assessment of each vessel to determine whether events or changes in circumstances exist that may
indicate that the carrying amount of the vessel is greater than its fair value and may no longer be recoverable. Total vessels
carrying value as of December 31, 2022 were $1,001.12 million. Please note that from the above mentioned amount tested for impairment
indication, vessel M/V Pedhoulas Trader has been excluded since it is classified as held for sale as of 31.12.2022.
If indicators of impairment exist for a vessel, the
Company determines the recoverable amount by estimating the undiscounted future cash flows associated with the vessel. If the carrying
value of the vessel exceeds its undiscounted future net cash flows, the carrying value is reduced to its fair value. The undiscounted
future cash flows incorporate various factors and significant assumptions, including estimated future charter rates. Future charter
rates reflect the rates currently in effect for the duration of the vessels’ current charters, and an estimated daily time charter
equivalent for the unchartered period using the twelve -month budgeted rate for the vessel class for the first year; the Forward
Freight Agreement charter rate for the vessel class for the second year; and thereafter, the most recent ten-year historical time
charter average for the vessel class adding an estimated premium for vessels with installed scrubbers.
We identified future charter rates used in the undiscounted
future cash flows analysis as a critical audit matter because of the complex judgements made by management to estimate future charter
rates and the significant impact they have on undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated over the remaining useful life of
the vessel.
This required a high degree of auditor judgment and
an increased extent of effort when performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of management’s future charter
rates.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the
Audit
Our audit procedures related to the future charter
rates utilized in the undiscounted future cash flows included the following among others:
|
~ |
We tested the effectiveness of controls over management’s review of the impairment
analysis, including the future charter rates used within the undiscounted future cash flows analysis. |
|
~ |
We evaluated the reasonableness of the Company’s estimate of future charter rates by: |
|
|
1. Evaluating the Company’s methodology for estimating the future charter rates by
comparing the future charter rates utilized in the future undiscounted net operating cash flows to a) the Company’s
historical rates, including the actual scrubber premium earned on the Company’s past charter contracts, b) historical
rate information by vessel class published by third parties c) the Company’s budget and d) other external market sources,
including analysts’ reports, market reports on spreads on marine fuel (for determination of premium for scrubber fitted
vessels), reports on prospective market outlook. |
|
|
2. Considering the consistency of the assumptions used in the future charter rates, including
scrubber premium, with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit. This included a) internal communications by management
to the board of directors, and b) external communications by management to analysts and investors. |
|
|
3. Evaluating management’s ability to accurately forecast by comparing actual results
to management’s historical forecasts. |
/s/ Deloitte Certified Public Accountants S.A.
Athens, Greece
March 6, 2023
We have served as the Company’s auditor since
2007.
SAFE BULKERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 2021 AND 2022
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except for share and
per share data)
| |
| | |
December
31, |
| |
Notes | | |
2021 | | |
2022 | |
ASSETS | |
| | |
| | |
| |
CURRENT ASSETS: | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Cash and cash equivalents | |
| | | |
$ | 101,004 | | |
$ | 49,186 | |
Time deposits | |
| | | |
| 1,080 | | |
| 64,191 | |
Accounts receivable | |
| | | |
| 8,082 | | |
| 6,475 | |
Assets held for sale | |
| 6 | | |
| — | | |
| 11,980 | |
Due from Manager | |
| 3 | | |
| — | | |
| 22 | |
Inventories | |
| | | |
| 8,653 | | |
| 17,323 | |
Derivative assets current | |
| 14 | | |
| 1,148 | | |
| 1,098 | |
Accrued revenue | |
| 18 | | |
| 665 | | |
| 662 | |
Restricted cash | |
| | | |
| — | | |
| 1,000 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | |
| | | |
| 3,484 | | |
| 5,764 | |
Total current assets | |
| | | |
| 124,116 | | |
| 157,701 | |
FIXED ASSETS: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Vessels, net | |
| 4 | | |
| 864,391 | | |
| 1,001,120 | |
Right-of-use asset | |
| 7 | | |
| 31,938 | | |
| — | |
Advances for vessels | |
| 5 | | |
| 56,484 | | |
| 76,280 | |
Total fixed assets | |
| | | |
| 952,813 | | |
| 1,077,400 | |
OTHER NON CURRENT ASSETS: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Deferred financing costs | |
| | | |
| 884 | | |
| 510 | |
Restricted cash | |
| | | |
| 10,250 | | |
| 8,900 | |
Derivative assets long-term | |
| 14 | | |
| 5,879 | | |
| 1,156 | |
Accrued revenue | |
| 18 | | |
| 282 | | |
| 225 | |
Other non current assets | |
| | | |
| 96 | | |
| 26 | |
Total assets | |
| | | |
| 1,094,320 | | |
| 1,245,918 | |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Current portion of long-term debt, net | |
| 8 | | |
| 39,912 | | |
| 43,556 | |
Liability directly associated with assets held for sale | |
| 6 | | |
| — | | |
| 16,930 | |
Unearned revenue | |
| 18 | | |
| 11,014 | | |
| 9,520 | |
Trade accounts payable | |
| | | |
| 9,985 | | |
| 10,487 | |
Accrued liabilities | |
| 15 | | |
| 5,371 | | |
| 10,766 | |
Derivative liabilities current | |
| 14 | | |
| 414 | | |
| — | |
Lease Liability | |
| 7 | | |
| 21,945 | | |
| — | |
Due to Manager | |
| 3 | | |
| 51 | | |
| 58 | |
Total current liabilities | |
| | | |
| 88,692 | | |
| 91,317 | |
Long-term debt, net | |
| 8 | | |
| 315,796 | | |
| 370,806 | |
Unearned revenue long-term | |
| 18 | | |
| 7,989 | | |
| 7,330 | |
Derivative liabilities long-term | |
| 14 | | |
| — | | |
| 307 | |
Other liabilities | |
| | | |
| 2,603 | | |
| 4,242 | |
Total liabilities | |
| | | |
| 415,080 | | |
| 474,002 | |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | |
| 11 | | |
| | | |
| | |
MEZZANINE EQUITY - Redeemable non-controlling interest | |
| 10 | | |
| — | | |
| — | |
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 200,000,000 authorized, 121,640,839 and 118,868,317
issued and outstanding at December 31, 2021 and 2022, respectively | |
| 9 | | |
| 122 | | |
| 119 | |
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 20,000,000 authorized, 2,297,504 and 804,950
Series C Preferred Shares, 3,195,050 and 3,195,050 Series D Preferred Shares, issued and outstanding at December 31, 2021
and 2022, respectively | |
| 9 | | |
| 55 | | |
| 40 | |
Additional paid in capital | |
| | | |
| 425,202 | | |
| 378,968 | |
Retained earnings | |
| | | |
| 253,861 | | |
| 392,789 | |
Total shareholders’ equity | |
| | | |
| 679,240 | | |
| 771,916 | |
Total liabilities, mezzanine equity and shareholders’ equity | |
| | | |
| 1,094,320 | | |
| 1,245,918 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
these consolidated statements.
SAFE BULKERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED December 31,
2020, 2021 AND 2022
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars,
except for share and per share data)
| |
Years
Ended December 31, | |
| |
Notes | | |
2020 | | |
2021 | | |
2022 | |
REVENUES: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Revenues | |
| 12 | | |
$ | 206,035 | | |
$ | 343,475 | | |
$ | 364,050 | |
Commissions | |
| | | |
| (7,877) | | |
| (14,444) | | |
| (14,332) | |
Net revenues | |
| | | |
| 198,158 | | |
| 329,031 | | |
| 349,718 | |
EXPENSES: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Voyage expenses | |
| | | |
| (41,582) | | |
| (9,753) | | |
| (9,969) | |
Vessel operating expenses | |
| 13 | | |
| (70,086) | | |
| (72,049) | | |
| (80,211) | |
Depreciation and amortization | |
| 4,7 | | |
| (54,269) | | |
| (52,364) | | |
| (49,518) | |
General and administrative expenses | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
- Management fee to related parties | |
| 3,17 | | |
| (18,884) | | |
| (19,221) | | |
| (17,723) | |
- Company administration expenses | |
| 17 | | |
| (2,618) | | |
| (3,277) | | |
| (4,079) | |
Early redelivery income, net | |
| 20 | | |
| — | | |
| 7,470 | | |
| — | |
Other operating expense | |
| | | |
| (241) | | |
| — | | |
| (3,570) | |
Gain on sale of assets | |
| 19 | | |
| — | | |
| 11,579 | | |
| — | |
Operating income | |
| | | |
| 10,478 | | |
| 191,416 | | |
| 184,648 | |
OTHER (EXPENSE)/INCOME: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Interest expense | |
| 8 | | |
| (21,233) | | |
| (14,719) | | |
| (17,138) | |
Other finance cost | |
| | | |
| (641) | | |
| (798) | | |
| (1,353) | |
Interest income | |
| | | |
| 604 | | |
| 69 | | |
| 783 | |
(Loss)/gain on derivatives | |
| 14 | | |
| (1,303) | | |
| 2,188 | | |
| 8,723 | |
Foreign currency gain/(loss) | |
| | | |
| 916 | | |
| (910) | | |
| (1,101) | |
Amortization and write-off of deferred finance charges | |
| | | |
| (1,726) | | |
| (2,898) | | |
| (2,008) | |
Net (loss)/income | |
| | | |
| (12,905) | | |
| 174,348 | | |
| 172,554 | |
Less preferred
dividend attributable to preferred shareholders | |
| | | |
| 11,500 | | |
| 11,064 | | |
| 8,978 | |
Less/(plus) Mezzanine equity measurement | |
| | | |
| 908 | | |
| (271) | | |
| — | |
Net (loss)/income available to common shareholders | |
| | | |
$ | (25,313) | | |
$ | 163,555 | | |
$ | 163,576 | |
(Loss)/earnings
per share in U.S. Dollars, basic and diluted | |
| 22 | | |
$ | (0.25) | | |
$ | 1.44 | | |
$ | 1.36 | |
Weighted average number of shares, basic and diluted | |
| | | |
| 102,617,944 | | |
| 113,716,354 | | |
| 120,653,507 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
these consolidated statements.
SAFE BULKERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED December 31, 2020, 2021 AND 2022
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars)
| |
Common Stock | | |
Treasury Stock | | |
Preferred Stock | | |
Additional Paid in Capital | | |
Retained Earnings | | |
Total | |
Balance as of January 1, 2020 | |
$ | 104 | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | 55 | | |
$ | 356,963 | | |
$ | 115,620 | | |
$ | 472,742 | |
Net loss | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| (12,905) | | |
| (12,905) | |
Issuance of common stock | |
| 3 | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 3,297 | | |
| — | | |
| 3,300 | |
Repurchase and cancellation of preferred treasury stock | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| (89) | | |
| — | | |
| (89) | |
Repurchase and cancellation of common stock | |
| (5) | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| (6,007) | | |
| — | | |
| (6,012) | |
Share based compensation | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 120 | | |
| — | | |
| 120 | |
Mezzanine equity measurement | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| (908) | | |
| (908) | |
Preferred share dividends declared | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| (11,501) | | |
| (11,501) | |
Balance at December 31, 2020 | |
$ | 102 | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | 55 | | |
$ | 354,284 | | |
$ | 90,306 | | |
$ | 444,747 | |
Net income | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 174,348 | | |
| 174,348 | |
Issuance of common stock | |
| 20 | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 71,517 | | |
| — | | |
| 71,537 | |
Offering expenses of “at-the-market” common stock equity offering | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| (719) | | |
| — | | |
| (719) | |
Share based compensation | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 120 | | |
| — | | |
| 120 | |
Mezzanine equity measurement | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 271 | | |
| 271 | |
Preferred share dividends declared | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| (11,064) | | |
| (11,064) | |
Balance at December 31, 2021 | |
$ | 122 | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | 55 | | |
$ | 425,202 | | |
$ | 253,861 | | |
$ | 679,240 | |
Net income | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 172,554 | | |
| 172,554 | |
Redemption of preferred stock | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| (15) | | |
| (37,299) | | |
| — | | |
| (37,314) | |
Repurchase and cancellation of common stock | |
| (3) | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| (9,048) | | |
| — | | |
| (9,051) | |
Preferred stock redemption expenses | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| (7) | | |
| — | | |
| (7) | |
Share based compensation | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 120 | | |
| — | | |
| 120 | |
Common share dividends declared | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| (24,142) | | |
| (24,142) | |
Preferred share dividends declared | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| (9,484) | | |
| (9,484) | |
Balance at December 31, 2022 | |
$ | 119 | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | 40 | | |
$ | 378,968 | | |
$ | 392,789 | | |
$ | 771,916 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated statements.
SAFE BULKERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
2020, 2021 AND 2022
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars)
|
|
|
December
31, |
|
|
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2022 |
|
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(loss)/income |
|
|
(12,905) |
|
|
174,348 |
|
|
172,554 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net (loss)/income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization |
|
|
54,269 |
|
|
52,364 |
|
|
49,518 |
|
Gain
on sale of assets |
|
|
— |
|
|
(11,579) |
|
|
— |
|
Unrealized
loss on inventory valuation |
|
|
241 |
|
|
— |
|
|
3,570 |
|
Amortization
and write-off of deferred finance charges |
|
|
1,726 |
|
|
2,898 |
|
|
2,008 |
|
Unrealized
loss/(gain) on derivatives |
|
|
1,704 |
|
|
(8,438) |
|
|
4,666 |
|
Unrealized
foreign exchange (gain)/loss |
|
|
(254) |
|
|
794 |
|
|
(5,316) |
|
Share
based compensation |
|
|
120 |
|
|
120 |
|
|
120 |
|
Change
in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable |
|
|
10,475 |
|
|
(3,198) |
|
|
1,607 |
|
Due
from Manager |
|
|
510 |
|
|
48 |
|
|
(22) |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(3,531) |
|
|
3,902 |
|
|
(13,176) |
|
Accrued
revenue |
|
|
(19) |
|
|
(315) |
|
|
60 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets |
|
|
436 |
|
|
351 |
|
|
(2,280) |
|
Due
to Manager |
|
|
(9) |
|
|
51 |
|
|
7 |
|
Trade
accounts payable |
|
|
2,455 |
|
|
(3,988) |
|
|
505 |
|
Accrued
liabilities |
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
(829) |
|
|
4,669 |
|
Non
current assets & Other liabilities |
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
1,435 |
|
|
1,709 |
|
Unearned
revenue |
|
|
6,071 |
|
|
9,244 |
|
|
(2,153) |
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating
Activities |
|
|
63,376 |
|
|
217,208 |
|
|
218,046 |
|
Cash
Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel
advances |
|
|
(50,444) |
|
|
(109,230) |
|
|
(183,276) |
|
Proceeds
from sale of assets |
|
|
— |
|
|
107,084 |
|
|
16,930 |
|
Increase
in bank time deposits |
|
|
(93,793) |
|
|
(2,310) |
|
|
(79,817) |
|
Maturity
of bank time deposits |
|
|
109,453 |
|
|
13,010 |
|
|
16,759 |
|
Net Cash (Used in)/Provided
by Investing Activities |
|
|
(34,784) |
|
|
8,554 |
|
|
(229,404) |
|
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from long-term debt |
|
|
92,400 |
|
|
178,800 |
|
|
259,575 |
|
Principal
payments of long-term debt |
|
|
(81,995) |
|
|
(434,746) |
|
|
(191,302) |
|
Dividends
paid |
|
|
(11,497) |
|
|
(11,198) |
|
|
(33,626) |
|
Payment
of deferred financing costs |
|
|
(1,762) |
|
|
(2,425) |
|
|
(6,405) |
|
Finance
lease payments |
|
|
— |
|
|
(9,786) |
|
|
(21,971) |
|
Payment
of common stock offering expenses |
|
|
(338) |
|
|
(381) |
|
|
— |
|
Payment
of preferred stock redemption expenses |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(7) |
|
Repurchase
of common stock |
|
|
(6,012) |
|
|
— |
|
|
(9,051) |
|
Repurchase
of preferred stock |
|
|
(89) |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Redemption
of preferred stock |
|
|
— |
|
|
(17,707) |
|
|
(37,314) |
|
Proceeds
on issuance of common stock |
|
|
— |
|
|
71,537 |
|
|
— |
|
Net
Cash Used in Financing Activities |
|
|
(9,293) |
|
|
(225,906) |
|
|
(40,101) |
|
Net
increase/(decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash |
|
|
19,299 |
|
|
(144) |
|
|
(51,459) |
|
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash |
|
|
254 |
|
|
(794) |
|
|
(709) |
|
Cash, cash equivalents and
restricted cash at beginning of year |
|
$ |
92,639 |
|
$ |
112,192 |
|
$ |
111,254 |
|
Cash,
cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year |
|
|
112,192 |
|
|
111,254 |
|
|
59,086 |
|
| |
December
31, | |
| |
2020 | | |
2021 | | |
2022 | |
Supplemental
cash flow information: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash
paid for interest (excluding capitalized interest): | |
| 20,943 | | |
| 13,693 | | |
| 13,670 | |
Non
Cash Investing and Financing Activities: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Unpaid
financing fees | |
| 111 | | |
| 1,303 | | |
| 180 | |
Part
payment of vessel advances through issuance of common stock and preferred stock | |
| 3,300 | | |
| — | | |
| — | |
Unpaid
dividend on preferred stock | |
| 134 | | |
| — | | |
| — | |
Unpaid
common stock offering expenses | |
| 56 | | |
| — | | |
| — | |
Unpaid
capital expenditure | |
| 964 | | |
| 1,482 | | |
| 3,704 | |
Right
of use asset recognized | |
| — | | |
| 32,107 | | |
| — | |
Unpaid
Lease liability on initial recognition | |
| — | | |
| 22,757 | | |
| — | |
Reconciliation
of Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash
and cash equivalents | |
| 90,038 | | |
| 101,004 | | |
| 49,186 | |
Restricted
cash – Current assets | |
| 3,400 | | |
| — | | |
| 1,000 | |
Restricted
cash – Non current assets | |
| 18,754 | | |
| 10,250 | | |
| 8,900 | |
Cash,
cash equivalents and restricted cash shown in the statement of cash flows | |
$ | 112,192 | | |
$ | 111,254 | | |
$ | 59,086 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
these consolidated statements.
SAFE BULKERS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands of United States Dollars—except for share and per share data, unless otherwise stated) |
1. Basis of Presentation and General Information
Safe Bulkers, Inc. (“Safe
Bulkers”) was formed on December 11, 2007, under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands. Safe Bulkers’ common
stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “SB.”
Polys Hajioannou, by virtue
of shares owned indirectly through various private entities, owns or controls 40.70% of our outstanding common stock and is the
largest shareholder of Safe Bulkers and as a result has significant influence on the outcome of matters on which shareholders are
entitled to vote, including the election of the entire board of directors and other significant corporate actions.
Since Safe Bulkers’ initial
public offering in 2008, Safe Bulkers has successfully completed five additional public common stock offerings, three preferred
stock offerings, an unsecured bond issuance and an ongoing “at-the-market” common stock equity offering program (the
“ATM Program”).
As of December 31, 2022, Safe
Bulkers held 64 wholly owned companies (which are referred to herein as “Subsidiaries”) which together owned and operated
a fleet of 44 drybulk vessels and were scheduled to acquire nine additional newbuild vessels (the “Newbuilds”).
Safe Bulkers and its Subsidiaries
are collectively referred to in the notes to the consolidated financial statements as the “Company.”
The Company’s
principal business is the ownership and operation of drybulk vessels. The Company’s vessels operate worldwide, carrying drybulk
cargo for the world’s largest consumers of marine drybulk transportation services. Safety Management Overseas S.A., a company
incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Panama (“Safety Management”), Safe Bulkers Management Limited, a company
incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Cyprus (“Safe Bulkers Management,”) and, together with Safety Management
the “Original Managers”, and Safe Bulkers Management Monaco Inc., a company incorporated under the laws of the Republic
of the Marshall Islands (“Safe Bulkers Management Monaco,” or “New Manager”) and, together with the Original
Managers the “Managers,” and either of them “the Manager”, related parties all controlled by Polys Hajioannou,
provide technical, commercial and administrative management services to the Company.
The accompanying consolidated
financial statements include the operations, assets and liabilities of the Company, and of its Subsidiaries listed below
Subsidiary | |
Vessel Name | |
Type | |
Built |
Kerasies Shipping Corporation (“Kerasies”)(1) | |
Katerina | |
Panamax | |
May 2004 |
Marathassa Shipping Corporation (“Marathassa”)(1) | |
Maritsa | |
Panamax | |
January 2005 |
Napalem Shipping Corporation (“Napalem”)(2)(13)(19) | |
Paraskevi 2 | |
Panamax | |
April 2011 |
Maxeikositessera Shipping Corporation (“Maxeikositessera”)(2) | |
Efrossini | |
Panamax | |
February 2012 |
Glovertwo Shipping Corporation (“Glovertwo”)(2) | |
Zoe | |
Panamax | |
July 2013 |
Stalem Shipping Corporation (“Stalem”)(2)(14)(19) | |
Koulitsa 2 | |
Panamax | |
February 2013 |
Shikokutessera Shipping Inc. (“Shikokutessera”)(2) | |
Kypros Land | |
Panamax | |
January 2014 |
Shikokupente Shipping Inc. (“Shikokupente”)(2) | |
Kypros Sea | |
Panamax | |
March 2014 |
Gloverfour Shipping Corporation (“Gloverfour”)(2) | |
Kypros Bravery | |
Panamax | |
January 2015 |
Shikokuokto Shipping Corporation (“Shikokuokto”)(2) | |
Kypros Sky | |
Panamax | |
March 2015 |
Gloverfive Shipping Corporation (“Gloverfive”)(2) | |
Kypros Loyalty | |
Panamax | |
June 2015 |
Gloversix Shipping Corporation (“Gloversix”)(2) | |
Kypros Spirit | |
Panamax | |
July 2016 |
Pemer Shipping Ltd. (“Pemer”)(1) | |
Pedhoulas Merchant | |
Kamsarmax | |
March 2006 |
Petra Shipping Ltd. (“Petra”)(1)(17) | |
Pedhoulas Trader | |
Kamsarmax | |
May 2006 |
Pelea Shipping Ltd. (“Pelea”)(1) | |
Pedhoulas Leader | |
Kamsarmax | |
March 2007 |
Vassone Shipping Corporation (“Vassone”)(2) | |
Pedhoulas Commander | |
Kamsarmax | |
May 2008 |
Youngone Shipping Corporation (“Youngone”)(2) | |
Pedhoulas Cherry | |
Kamsarmax | |
July 2015 |
Youngtwo Shipping Corporation (“Youngtwo”)(2) | |
Pedhoulas Rose | |
Kamsarmax | |
January 2017 |
Pinewood Shipping Corporation (“Pinewood”)(2)(5) | |
Pedhoulas Cedrus | |
Kamsarmax | |
June 2018 |
Agros Shipping Corporation (“Agros”)(2)(20) | |
Vassos | |
Kamsarmax | |
May 2022 |
Marinouki Shipping Corporation (“Marinouki”)(1) | |
Marina | |
Post-Panamax | |
January 2006 |
Soffive Shipping Corporation (“Soffive”)(1) | |
Sophia | |
Post-Panamax | |
June 2007 |
Vasstwo Shipping Corporation (“Vasstwo”)(1) | |
Xenia | |
Post-Panamax | |
August 2006 |
Eniaprohi Shipping Corporation (“Eniaprohi”)(1) | |
Eleni | |
Post-Panamax | |
November 2008 |
Eniadefhi Shipping Corporation (“Eniadefhi”)(1) | |
Martine | |
Post-Panamax | |
February 2009 |
Maxdodeka Shipping Corporation (“Maxdodeka”)(1) | |
Andreas K | |
Post-Panamax | |
September 2009 |
Subsidiary | |
Vessel Name | |
Type | |
Built |
Pentakomo Shipping Corporation (“Pentakomo”)(2) | |
Agios Spyridonas | |
Post-Panamax | |
January 2010 |
Maxdekatria Shipping Corporation (“Maxdekatria”)(1) | |
Panayiota K | |
Post-Panamax | |
April 2010 |
Maxdeka Shipping Corporation (“Maxdeka”)(2) | |
Venus Heritage | |
Post-Panamax | |
December 2010 |
Shikoku Friendship Shipping Company (“Shikoku”)(2) | |
Venus History | |
Post-Panamax | |
September 2011 |
Maxenteka Shipping Corporation (“Maxenteka”)(2) | |
Venus Horizon | |
Post-Panamax | |
February 2012 |
Vaslem Shipping Corporation (“Vaslem”)(2)(15)(19) | |
Venus Harmony | |
Post-Panamax | |
November 2013 |
Shikokuepta Shipping Inc. (“Shikokuepta”)(2) | |
Troodos Sun | |
Post-Panamax | |
January 2016 |
Kastrolem Shipping Corporation (“Kastrolem”)(2)(18)(19) | |
Troodos Air | |
Post-Panamax | |
March 2016 |
Monagrouli Shipping Corporation (“Monagrouli”)(2) | |
Troodos Oak | |
Post-Panamax | |
April 2020 |
Lofou Shipping Corporation (“Lofou”)(2)(21) | |
Climate Respect | |
Post-Panamax | |
July 2022 |
Gloverthree Shipping Corporation (“Gloverthree”)(2)(23) | |
Climate Ethics | |
Post-Panamax | |
January 2023 |
Maxpente Shipping Corporation (“Maxpente”)(1) | |
Kanaris | |
Capesize | |
March 2010 |
Eptaprohi Shipping Corporation (“Eptaprohi”)(1) | |
Pelopidas | |
Capesize | |
November 2011 |
Maxtessera Shipping Corporation (“Maxtessera”)(2) | |
Lake Despina | |
Capesize | |
January 2014 |
Shikokuennia Shipping Corporation (“Shikokuennia”)(2) | |
Mount Troodos | |
Capesize | |
November 2009 |
Metamou Shipping Corporation (“Metamou”)(2)(16) | |
Stelios Y | |
Capesize | |
March 2012 |
Armonikos Shipping Corporation (“Armonikos”)(2)(15) | |
Michalis H | |
Capesize | |
March 2012 |
Kyotofriendo One Shipping Corporation (“Kyotofriendo One”)(2)(13) | |
Aghia Sofia | |
Capesize | |
March 2012 |
Staloudi Shipping Corporation (“Staloudi”)(1)(22) | |
Maria | |
Capesize | |
January 2014 |
Gloverseven Shipping Corporation (“Gloverseven”)(2)(4) | |
TBN - H 11043 | |
Post-Panamax | |
Q2 2023 |
Shimafive Shipping Corporation (“Shimafive”)(2)(4) | |
TBN - H 11064 | |
Kamsarmax | |
Q4 2023 |
Shimasix Shipping Corporation (“Shimasix”)(2)(4) | |
TBN - H 11065 | |
Kamsarmax | |
Q1 2024 |
Shimaseven Shipping Corporation (“Shimaseven”)(2)(4) | |
TBN - H 11067 | |
Kamsarmax | |
Q1 2024 |
Shimaeight Shipping Corporation (“Shimaeight”)(2)(4) | |
TBN - H 11081 | |
Kamsarmax | |
Q4 2023 |
Yasudyo Shipping Corporation (“Yasudyo”)(2)(4) | |
TBN - H 1392 | |
Kamsarmax | |
Q4 2023 |
Agonistis Shipping Corporation (“Agonistis”)(2)(4) | |
TBN - H 1139 | |
Kamsarmax | |
Q1 2025 |
Georgos Shipping Corporation (“Georgos”)(2)(4) | |
TBN - H 1138 | |
Kamsarmax | |
Q3 2024 |
Safe Bulkers Participations Plc. (“Safe Bulkers Participations”)(3) | |
— | |
— | |
— |
Shikokuexi Shipping Inc. (“Shikokuexi”)(2)(18) | |
— | |
— | |
— |
Kyotofriendo Two Shipping Corporation (“Kyotofriendo Two”)(2)(14) | |
— | |
— | |
— |
Maxeikosipente Shipping Corporation (“Maxeikosipente”)(1) | |
— | |
— | |
— |
Maxeikosiepta Shipping Corporation (“Maxeikosiepta”)(1)(6) | |
— | |
— | |
— |
Marindou Shipping Corporation (“Marindou”)(1)(10) | |
— | |
— | |
— |
Maxeikosiexi Shipping Corporation (“Maxeikosiexi”)(1)(11) | |
— | |
— | |
— |
Avstes Shipping Corporation (“Avstes”)(1)(7) | |
— | |
— | |
— |
Maxeikosi Shipping Corporation (“Maxeikosi”)(1)(8) | |
— | |
— | |
— |
Maxeikositria Shipping Corporation (“Maxeikositria”)(1)(12) | |
— | |
— | |
— |
Maxeikosiena Shipping Corporation (“Maxeikosiena”)(1)(9) | |
— | |
— | |
— |
|
(1) |
Incorporated under the laws of the Republic of
Liberia. |
|
(2) |
Incorporated under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall
Islands. |
|
(3) |
Safe Bulkers Participations is a wholly owned subsidiary
of Safe Bulkers, incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Cyprus and is the holding company of four wholly owned subsidiaries:
Vaslem, Napalem, Stalem and Kastrolem. Safe Bulkers Participations has issued and listed an unsecured bond of euro 100 million
to the Athens Stock Exchange. See Note 8. |
|
(4) |
Estimated completion date for newbuild vessels as of December
31, 2022. |
|
(5) |
In July 2016, the Shipsales Contract relating to Hull No.
1552, initially contracted by Kyotofriendo Two, was novated to Pinewood. Under an agreement with an unaffiliated third party,
upon delivery of the vessel, named Pedhoulas Cedrus, to Pinewood in June 2018, 100 shares of Series A Preferred Stock of Pinewood
were issued to the unaffiliated third party for proceeds in the equivalent of $16,875 at the time of issuance, which were
used to finance part of the cost of such vessel. All Series A Preferred Stock were redeemed by Pinewood in February 2021. |
|
(6) |
The Company owned the Panamax class vessel Paraskevi, built
2003, which was sold in January 2021 and delivered to her new owners in April 2021. |
|
(7) |
The Company owned the Panamax class vessel Vassos, built
2004, which was sold in January 2021 and delivered to her new owners in May 2021. |
|
(8) |
The Company owned the Kamsarmax class vessel Pedhoulas Builder,
built 2012, which was sold in May 2021 and delivered to her new owners in June 2021. |
|
(9) |
The Company owned the Kamsarmax class vessel Pedhoulas Farmer,
built 2012, which was sold in May 2021 and delivered to her new owners in September 2021. |
|
(10) |
The Company owned the Panamax class vessel Maria, built 2003,
which was sold in May 2021 and delivered to her new owners in September 2021. |
|
(11) |
The Company owned the Panamax class vessel Koulitsa, built
2003, which was sold in June 2021 and delivered to her new owners in November 2021. |
|
(12) |
The Company owned the Kamsarmax class vessel Pedhoulas Fighter,
built 2012, which was sold in September 2021 and delivered to her new owners in November 2021. |
|
(13) |
Kyotofriendo One owned the Panamax class vessel
Paraskevi 2, built 2011, which was sold in January 2022 and delivered in May 2022 to Napalem. Kyotofriendo One acquired the
vessel Aghia Sofia in August 2022. |
|
(14) |
yotofriendo Two owned the Panamax class vessel Koulitsa 2,
built 2013, which was sold in January 2022 and delivered in April 2022 to Stalem. |
|
(15) |
Armonikos owned the Post-Panamax class
vessel Venus Harmony, built 2013, which was sold in January 2022 and delivered in April 2022 to Vaslem. Armonikos acquired
the vessel Michalis H in May 2022. |
|
(16) |
In July 2021, the Company entered into an agreement for the
period bareboat charter of a 2012-built Japanese Capesize class vessel named Stelios Y, which is accounted for as a finance
lease. The vessel was delivered to the Company in November 2021. Refer to Note 7. |
|
(17) |
The Company sold the vessel in January 2023. See subsequent
events Note 23. |
|
(18) |
Shikokuexi owned the Post-Panamax class vessel Troodos Air,
built 2016, which was sold in January 2022 and delivered in April 2022 to Kastrolem. |
|
(19) |
Wholly owned subsidiary of Safe
Bulkers Participations. |
|
(20) |
The Company acquired the vessel Vassos in May 2022. |
|
(21) |
The Company acquired the vessel Climate Respect in July 2022. |
|
(22) |
The Company acquired the vessel Maria in February 2022. |
|
(23) |
The Company acquired the vessel Climate Ethics in January
2023. See subsequent events Note 23. |
For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022
the following charterers individually accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s revenues as follows:
| |
December
31, |
| |
2020 | | |
2021 | | |
2022 | |
Viterra B.V. (ex-Glencore Agriculture B.V.) | |
| 15.01 | % | |
| 16.08 | % | |
| 15.81 | % |
Cargill International S.A. | |
| 11.13 | % | |
| 14.62 | % | |
| 17.71 | % |
Coronavirus Outbreak: On March 11, 2020, the
World Health Organization declared the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (the “Covid-19”) outbreak a pandemic. In response to
the outbreak, many countries, ports and organizations, including those where we conduct a large part of our operations, have implemented
measures to combat the outbreak, such as quarantines and travel restrictions, which may continue to cause trade disruptions and
volatility in the commodity markets. Although to date there has not been any significant effect on our operating activities due
to Covid-19 other than the decrease in market rates in 2020, which have recovered in 2021 and increased crew cost, the extent to
which a new wave of the Covid-19 will impact the Company’s results of operations and financial condition will depend on future
developments, which are uncertain and cannot be predicted. Accordingly, an estimate of the future impact cannot be made at this
time.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation: The accompanying
consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and include all accounts of the Company. All intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated upon consolidation.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of
the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates may include
recoverability of long -lived assets, the valuation of amounts due from charterers, residual value of vessels and the useful life
of vessels. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss): The
Company follows the accounting guidance relating to Statement of Comprehensive Income, which requires separate presentation of
certain transactions that are recorded directly as components of shareholders’ equity. The Company has no other comprehensive
income/(loss) and accordingly comprehensive income/(loss) equals net income/(loss) for the periods presented.
Foreign Currency Translation: The reporting
and functional currency of the Company is the U.S. dollar (“USD”). Transactions incurred in other currencies are translated
into USD using the exchange rates in effect at the time of the transaction. On the balance sheet date, monetary assets and liabilities
that are denominated in other currencies are translated into USD to reflect the end-of-period exchange rates. Resulting gains or
losses from foreign currency transactions are recorded within foreign currency gain/(loss) in the accompanying consolidated statements
of operations in the period in which they arise.
Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash and
cash equivalents consist of current, call, time deposits and certificates of deposit with original maturities of three months or
less and which are not restricted for use or withdrawal.
Time Deposits: Time deposits are held
with banks with original maturities longer than three months. In the event remaining maturities are shorter than 12 months, such
deposits are classified as current assets; if original maturities are longer than 12 months, such deposits are classified as non-current
assets.
Restricted Cash: Restricted cash represents
minimum cash deposits or cash collateral deposits required to be maintained with certain banks under the Company’s borrowing
arrangements or in relation to bank guarantees issued on behalf of the Company. In the event that the obligation relating to such
deposits is expected to be terminated within the next 12 months, these deposits are classified as current assets; otherwise they
are classified as non-current assets.
Accounts Receivable: Accounts receivable
reflect trade receivables from time or voyage charters and other receivables from operational activities, net of an allowance for
doubtful accounts. On each balance sheet date, all potentially uncollectible accounts are assessed individually for purposes of
determining the appropriate provision for doubtful accounts. No allowance for doubtful accounts was recorded for any of the periods
presented.
Inventories: Inventories
consist of bunkers and lubricants owned by the Company remaining on board the vessels at the end of each reporting period, which
are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method. Inventories
consist of $3,863 and $11,649 of bunkers and of $4,790 and $5,674 of lubricants as of December 31, 2021 and 2022, respectively.
Vessels, Net: Vessels
are stated at their cost, which consists of the contracted purchase price and any direct material expenses incurred upon acquisition
(including improvements, on-site supervision expenses and financing costs incurred during the construction period for vessels under
construction, commissions paid, delivery expenses and other expenditures to prepare the vessel for her initial voyage), less accumulated
depreciation and impairment, if any. Certain subsequent expenditures for conversions, major improvements and regulatory requirements
are also capitalized if it is determined that they appreciably extend the life, increase the earning capacity or improve the efficiency
or safety of the vessels.
Vessels’ Depreciation:
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the vessels, after considering
the estimated residual value. The Company estimates the useful life of its vessels to be 25 years from the date of initial delivery
from the shipyard. Second-hand vessels are depreciated from the date they become available for use through their remaining estimated
useful life. Effective January 1, 2022, we changed the estimate of vessels’ residual value, from a scrap rate of $182 per light
weight ton to $375 per light weight ton. The Net Income for the year ended December 31, 2022 would have been $163,910 if there
was no change in the estimated scrap value, representing a $8,644 reduction to the net income, and the basic and diluted net earnings
per share for the year ended December 31, 2022, would have been $1.28 per share and $1.28 per share, respectively, if there was
no change in the estimated scrap value, representing a $0.08 and $0.08 reduction to the basic and diluted net earnings per share,
respectively.
Accounting for Special
Survey and Drydocking Costs: Special survey and drydocking costs are expensed in the period incurred and are included in
vessel operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Repairs and Maintenance:
Repair and maintenance expenses, including overhauling and underwater inspection expenses, are expensed when incurred and
are included in vessel operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Impairment of Vessels:
The Company follows the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Subtopic 360-10, “Property, Plant and
Equipment” (“ASC 360-10”), which requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations
when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than
their carrying amounts. If indicators of impairment are present, the Company performs an analysis of the anticipated undiscounted
future net cash flows of the related long-lived vessels. Various factors including anticipated future charter rates, estimated
scrap values, future drydocking costs and estimated voyage and vessel operating costs are included in this analysis. If the carrying
value of the related vessel exceeds the undiscounted cash flows, the carrying value is reduced to its estimated fair value and
the difference is recorded as an impairment loss in the consolidated statements of operations.
Assets Held for Sale: The
Company may dispose of certain of its vessels when suitable opportunities occur, including prior to the end of their useful lives.
The Company classifies assets as being held for sale when the following criteria are met: (i) management is committed to sell the
asset; (ii) the asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition; (iii) an active program to locate a buyer and other
actions required to complete the plan to sell the asset have been initiated; (iv) the sale of the asset is probable, and transfer
of the asset is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year; (v) the asset is being actively marketed
for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value; and (vi) actions required to complete the plan indicate
that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn.
Long-lived assets classified
as held for sale are measured at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less the cost to sell the asset. These assets
are no longer depreciated once they meet the criteria of being held for sale.
Right-of-Use Asset - Finance
Leases: The Company assesses whether a contract is, or contains, a lease, at inception of the contract. A right-of-use
asset and a corresponding lease liability is recognized with respect to all lease arrangements in which the Company is the lessee,
except for short-term leases (defined as leases with a lease term of 12 months or less). For these leases, the lease payments are
recognized as an operating expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The Company does not have any significant
operating leases.
A lease is classified as a finance
lease when the lease meets any of the following criteria at lease commencement a)the lease transfers ownership of the underlying
asset to the lessee by the end of the lease term, b) the lease grants the lessee an option to purchase the underlying asset that
the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise c) the lease term is for the major part of the remaining economic life of the underlying
asset, d) the present value of the sum of the lease payments and any residual value guaranteed by the lessee that is not already
reflected in the lease payments equals or exceeds substantially all of the fair value of the underlying asset or e) the underlying
asset is of such a specialized nature that it is expected to have no alternative use to the lessor at the end of the lease term.
When none of these criteria are met, the lease is classified as an operating lease.
Finance leases are accounted
for as the acquisition of a finance right-of-use asset and the incurrence of an obligation by the lessee. At the commencement date
of the finance lease, a lessee initially measures the lease liability at the present value, using the discount rate determined
on the commencement of the lease payments to be made over the lease term. Subsequently, the lease liability is increased by the
interest on the lease liability and decreased by the lease payments during the period. The interest on the lease liability is determined
in each period during the lease term as the amount that produces a constant periodic discount rate on the remaining balance of
the liability, taking into consideration the reassessment requirements.
A lessee initially measures the
finance right-of-use asset at cost which consists of: the amount of the initial measurement of the lease liability; any lease payments
made to the lessor at or before the commencement date, less any lease incentives received; and any initial direct costs incurred
by the lessee. Subsequently, the finance right-of-use asset is measured at cost less any ac-
cumulated amortization and any
accumulated impairment losses, taking into consideration the reassessment requirements. The finance right-of-use asset is amortized
on a straight-line basis from the commencement date to the end of the useful life of the finance right-of-use asset where the lease
transfers ownership of the underlying asset to the lessee or the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise an option to purchase
the underlying asset.
Deferred Financing Costs:
Financing fees incurred for obtaining new loans and credit facilities are deferred and amortized over the term of the respective
loan or credit facility using the effective interest rate method. The unamortized deferred financing costs are presented as a direct
deduction from the carrying amount of the related loan and credit facility in the consolidated balance sheet. Deferred financing
costs relating to undrawn facilities are presented under non-current assets in the consolidated balance sheet. Any unamortized
balance of costs relating to loans repaid or refinanced is expensed in the period in which the repayment or refinancing is made,
subject to the guidance regarding Debt Extinguishment. Any unamortized balance of costs related to credit facilities repaid and
terminated is expensed in the same period. Any unamortized balance of costs relating to the credit facilities refinanced is deferred
and amortized over the term of the respective refinanced credit facility in the period in which the refinancing occurs, subject
to the provisions of the accounting guidance relating to changes in Line-of-Credit or Revolving-Debt Arrangements.
Derivative Instruments:
The Company may enter into foreign exchange forward contracts, interest rate derivatives, bunker fuel price derivatives
and forward freight contracts to create economic hedges for its exposure to foreign currency movement, interest rates of its loan
obligations, bunker fuel consumed by its vessels and freight rates relating to the fluctuation of the vessel charter markets and
on certain other obligations. When such derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting the Company records these financial instruments
in the consolidated balance sheet at their fair value as either a derivative asset or a liability, and recognizes the fair value
changes thereto in the consolidated statements of operations. When the derivatives do qualify for hedge accounting, depending upon
the nature of the hedge, changes in fair value of the derivatives are either offset against the fair value of assets, liabilities
or firm commitments through income, or recognized in other comprehensive income/(loss) (effective portion) until the hedged item
is recognized in the consolidated statements of operations. For the years ended December 31, 2020, December 31, 2021 and December
31, 2022, no derivatives were accounted for as accounting hedges.
Financial Instruments:
|
(a) |
Interest rate risk: The Company’s interest rates and long-term loan repayment terms are described in Note 8. The Company manages its interest rate risk by entering into interest rate derivative instruments which are described in Note 14. |
|
(b) |
Concentration of credit risk: Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of trade accounts receivable, cash and cash equivalents, time deposits and derivative instruments. The Company limits its credit risk with accounts receivable by performing ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and generally does not require collateral for its trade accounts receivable as charter hire is usually collected in advance. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents, time deposits and other investments with high credit quality financial institutions. The Company performs periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of financial institutions it transacts with. The Company may be exposed to credit risk in the event of non-performance by its counterparties to derivative instruments; however, the Company limits its exposure by transacting with counterparties with high credit ratings. |
|
(c) |
Fair value measurement: In accordance with the requirements of accounting guidance relating to Fair Value Measurement, the Company classifies and discloses assets and liabilities carried at fair value in one of the following three categories: |
|
|
Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
Level 2: Observable market-based
inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
|
|
|
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market
data.
|
Treasury stock: The
Company records the repurchase of its shares at cost based on the settlement dates of repurchase transactions. These shares are
classified as treasury stock, as a reduction to shareholders’ equity. Treasury shares are included in authorized and issued
shares but excluded from outstanding shares.
Accounting for Revenues
and Related Expenses: The Company generates its revenues from charterers for the charter hire of its vessels. Vessels are
chartered under time charter or infrequently under voyage contracts.
A time charter is a contract
for the use of a vessel for a specific period of time and a specified daily fixed charter hire rate, or a rate linked to either
the Baltic Exchange Panamax Index (“BPI”) or to the Baltic Exchange Capesize Index (“BCI”). The charter
hire is generally payable in advance. The Company’s time charter agreements are classified as operating leases pursuant to
ASC 842 - Leases (“ASC 842”), because (i) the vessel is an identifiable asset, (ii) the Company does not have substantive
substitution rights and (iii) the charterer has the right to control the use of the vessel, during the term of the contract, and
derives the economic benefits from such use. Time charter revenue is recognized when a charter agreement exists, the vessel is
made available to the charterer and collection of the related revenue is reasonably assured. Time charter revenues are recognized
as earned on a straight-line basis over the term of the charter as service is provided. Revenues from time charter may also include
ballast bonus, which is an amount paid by the charterer for repositioning the vessel at the charterer’s disposal (delivery
point), which is recognized as revenue over the term of the charter, and other miscellaneous revenues from vessel operations. Time
charter hire is typically payable 15 or 30 days in advance as determined in the charter party agreement. On implementation of ASC
842 on January 1, 2019, the Company elected to apply a package of practical expedients under ASC 842, which allowed the Company
not to reassess (i) whether any existing contracts, on the date of adoption, contained a lease, (ii) lease classification of existing
leases classified as operating leases in accordance with ASC 840 and (iii) initial direct costs for any existing leases. ASC 842
also provides a practical expedient to lessors by class of underlying asset, to not separate non-lease components from the associated
lease component when the following criteria are met: (i) the timing and pattern of transfer for the lease component is the same
as those for the non-lease component associated with that lease component and (ii) the lease component, if accounted for separately,
would be classified as an operating lease. The Company, making use of this practical expedient for lessors,
has elected not to separate the lease and non-lease
components included in the time charter revenue but rather to recognize operating lease revenue as a combined single lease component
for all time charter contracts as the related lease component, the hire of a vessel, and non-lease component, the fees for operating
and maintaining the vessel, have the same timing and pattern of transfer (both the lease and non-lease components are earned by
passage of time) and the predominant component is the lease.
Expenses relating to the Company’s time charters
are vessel operating expenses and certain voyage expenses, which are paid by the Company and recognized as incurred. Vessel operating
expenses that are paid by the Company include costs for crewing, insurance, lubricants, spare parts, provisions, stores, repairs,
maintenance, statutory and classification expense, drydocking, intermediate and special surveys and other minor miscellaneous expenses.
Voyage expenses which are also recognized as incurred by the Company include costs for draft surveys, hold cleaning, postage, extra
war risk insurance and other minor miscellaneous expenses related to the voyage. Voyage expenses relating to bunkers consumption
during the ballast period are considered contract fulfillment costs and are capitalized and amortized over the term of the charter
when they meet the following criteria according to ASC 340-40-25-5: (i) the costs relate directly to a contract or to an anticipated
contract that the entity can specifically identify, (ii) the costs generate or enhance resources of the entity that will be used
in satisfying, or in continuing to satisfy, performance obligations in the future and (iii) the costs are expected to be recovered.
Under a time charter, the charterer is responsible for paying the cost of bunkers and other voyage expenses (e.g., port expenses,
agents’ fees, canal dues, extra war risks insurance and any other expenses related to the cargo). Certain voyage expenses
paid by the Company such as extra war risk insurance may be recovered from the charterer; such amounts recovered are recorded as
Other Income within Revenues.
Vessels are also chartered under voyage charters,
where a contract is made for the use of a vessel under which the Company is paid freight on the basis of moving cargo from a loading
port to a discharge port. The Company accounts for a voyage charter when all the following criteria are met: (i) the parties to
the contract have approved the contract in the form of a written charter agreement or fixture recap and are committed to perform
their respective obligations, (ii) the Company can identify each party’s rights regarding the services to be transferred,
(iii) the Company can identify the payment terms for the services to be transferred, (iv) the charter agreement has commercial
substance (that is, the risk, timing, or amount of the future cash flows is expected to change as a result of the contract) and
(v) it is probable that the Company will collect substantially all of the consideration to which it will be entitled in exchange
for the services that will be transferred to the charterer. The voyage contracts are considered service contracts which fall under
the provisions of ASC 606 because the Company as the ship-owner retains the control over the operations of the vessel such as directing
the routes taken or the vessel speed. In a voyage charter contract, the performance obligations begin to be satisfied once the
vessel begins loading the cargo. The Company determined that its voyage charters consist of a single performance obligation which
is met evenly as the voyage progresses and hence, the voyage revenues are recognized on a straight -line basis over the duration
of the voyage from commencement of the loading to completion of discharge. Probable losses on voyages are provided for in full
at the time such losses can be estimated. Related expenses are operating expenses, bunkers and voyage expenses and are all paid
for by the Company. Costs incurred prior to loading which are directly related to the voyage, primarily bunkers, may be deferred,
as they represent setup costs, if they meet certain conditions, and are amortized on a straight-line basis as the related performance
obligations are satisfied over the duration of the voyage from load port to discharge port. Such deferred costs are presented in
prepaid expenses and other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Costs incurred during the voyage are expensed as
incurred.
Voyage hire is typically paid partially upon initiation
of the voyage and partially upon completion of the performance obligation. During the years ended December 31, 2020, December 31,
2021 and December 31, 2022, there have been two instances in 2020, three instances in 2021 and no instances in 2022, where a vessel
was employed under a voyage charter. One of the voyage charters that begun during the year ended December 31, 2020 ended in the
same period, while the remaining voyage charter ended after December 31, 2020. All voyages charters during the year ended December
31, 2021, began and ended in the same period.
Unearned revenue includes: (i) cash received prior
to the balance sheet date relating to services to be rendered after the balance sheet date and (ii) deferred revenue resulting
from straight-line revenue recognition in respect of charter agreements that provide for varying charter rates. Accrued revenue
results from straight-line revenue recognition in respect of charter agreements that provide for varying charter rates.
Commissions (address and brokerage), regardless of
charter type, are always paid by the Company, are deferred and amortized over the related charter period and are presented as a
separate line item in revenues to arrive at net revenues in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Taxes: Entities within the group that
are incorporated under the laws of either the Republic of Liberia or the Republic of the Marshall Islands or the Republic of Cyprus
are not subject to Liberian or Marshall Islands or Cyprus income taxes. However, each vessel-owning Subsidiary is subject to registration
and tonnage taxes under the laws of the Republic of Cyprus or the Republic of the Marshall Islands depending on where each Company’s
vessel is registered. As of January 1, 2013, each vessel managed in Greece is subject to tonnage tax, under the laws of the Republic
of Greece. These registration and tonnage taxes are recorded within Vessel operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations and none are considered income taxes.
For our 2021 and 2022 taxable years, we believe we
were exempt from U.S federal tax on our U.S. source gross shipping income.
Dividends: Dividends are recorded in the
period in which they are declared by the Company’s board of directors.
Earnings/(Loss) Per Share: The computation
of basic earnings/(loss) per share is based on the weighted average number of common stock outstanding during the year and includes
the shares issuable to the audit committee chairman and the independent directors at the end of each year for services rendered.
The computation of basic earnings/(loss) per share is calculated after deducting the preferred stock dividends paid and accrued
(including any deemed dividend) from net income/(loss) divided by the weighted average number of shares.
Segment Reporting: The Company reports
financial information and evaluates its operations by total charter revenue and not by
the type of vessel or vessel
employment for its customers. The Company’s vessels have similar operating and economic characteristics. As a result, the
board of directors of the Company, the chief operating decision makers, review operating results solely by revenue per day and
operating results of the fleet, and thus the Company has determined that it operates under one reportable segment. Furthermore,
when the Company charters a vessel to a charterer, the charterer is free to trade the vessel worldwide and, as a result, the disclosure
of geographic information is impracticable.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements:
Reference Rate Reform: In
March 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2020-04, “Reference
Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting (“ASU 2020-04”).”
ASU 2020-04 provides temporary optional expedients and exceptions to the guidance in U.S. GAAP on contract modifications and hedge
accounting to ease the financial reporting burdens related to the expected market transition from the London Interbank Offered
Rate (“LIBOR”) and other interbank offered rates to alternative reference rates. In January 2021, the FASB issued ASU
2021-01 (Topic 848), which amends and clarifies the existing accounting standard issued in March 2020 ASU 2020-04 for Reference
Rate Reform. Reference rates such as LIBOR, are widely used in a broad range of financial instruments and other agreements. The
ASU permits entities to elect certain optional expedients and exceptions when accounting for derivative contracts and certain hedging
relationships affected by changes in the interest rates used for discounting cash flows, for computing variation margin settlements,
and for calculating price alignment interest in connection with reference rate reform activities under way in global financial
markets (the “discounting transition”). The ASU 2020-04 is effective for adoption at any time between March 12, 2020
and December 31, 2022, for all entities and the ASU 2021-01 is effective for all entities as of January 7, 2021 through December
31, 2022. In March 2021, the FCA announced that the intended cessation date of the overnight 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month tenors of
USD LIBOR would be June 30, 2023, which is beyond the current sunset date of Topic 848. Because the current relief in Topic 848
may not cover a period of time during which a significant number of modifications may take place, the FASB issued ASU No. 2022-06
(Topic 848) to defer the sunset date of Topic 848 from December 31, 2022, to December 31, 2024, after which entities will no longer
be permitted to apply the relief in Topic 848. The Company adopted the ASC 848 for its reporting period commencing January 1, 2022,
and there was no effect of this standard on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
3. Transactions with Related
Parties
A. The Managers
The Company enters from time
to time into management agreements with the Managers for the provision of executive officers and management services to vessel-owning
Subsidiaries. Pursuant to the management agreements, the vessel-owning Subsidiaries enter into separate ship management agreements
with either one of the Managers under which chartering, operations, technical and accounting services are provided to the vessels.
Pursuant to the management agreements, the Subsidiaries that have entered into agreements to acquire newbuild vessels are required
to enter into supervision agreements with either one of the Managers. The Managers under these agreements receive fees (the “Fees”),
comprised of ship management fees (the “Ship Management Fees”), supervision fees (the “Supervision Fees”)
and sale and purchase commissions (the “Commissions”). The Managers are related parties that are controlled by Polys
Hajioannou.
On May 29, 2018, following the
expiration of the old management agreements, Safe Bulkers signed new management agreements with the Original Managers (the “Original
Management Agreements”). The Original Management Agreements had an initial term of three years expiring on May 28, 2021 and
could be extended for two additional terms of three years each. The fees provided by the Original Management Agreements were fixed
until May 29, 2021 and could be adjusted for a subsequent term of three years each time on May 29, 2021 and May 29, 2024 upon mutual
agreement with the Original Managers. On May 29, 2021, the Company and the Original Managers agreed to extend the term of the Original
Management Agreements until May 29, 2024. On April 1, 2022, Safe Bulkers signed a new management agreement with the New Manager,
and together with the Original Management Agreements the “Management Agreements”, with the initial term expiring on May
29, 2024, which could be extended for one additional term of three years.
In accordance with the Management
Agreements, the Managers receive:
|
~ |
Ship Management Fees comprised of a daily ship management fee of €875 per vessel, payable monthly in arrears to the respective Manager and an annual ship management fee of €3,500,000 payable quarterly in arrears to only one of the Managers. For the three -year period from May 29, 2018 to May 28, 2021 the annual ship management fee was €3,000,000. |
|
~ |
Supervision Fees of $550 with respect to each newbuild for the services rendered by one of the Managers under the supervision agreement of which 50% is payable upon the signing of the relevant supervision agreement, and 50% is payable upon successful completion of the sea trials of each newbuild. |
|
~ |
Commissions equal to 1.00% calculated on the price set forth in the memorandum of agreement or other sale and purchase newbuild contract, or any other vessel bought or sold by the Company, payable upon final delivery of such vessel to the relevant purchaser. No commissions are charged on sale and lease back transactions. |
The Ship Management Fees are
recorded in Management Fees to Related Parties within General and Administrative Expenses (refer to Note 17). The Commissions on
purchase of newbuilds or second-hand vessels and the Supervision Fees are recorded initially in Advances for vessels (refer to
Note 5). The Commissions on sale are recorded in Gain or Loss on sale of assets, as the case may be.
Amounts due from/to the Manager
under the management agreements were zero receivable and $51 payable as of December 31, 2021 and $22 receivable and $58 payable
as of December 31, 2022.
The Fees charged by our Managers comprised the following:
| |
Year
Ended December 31, | |
| |
2020 | | |
2021 | | |
2022 | |
Ship Management Fees | |
$ | 18,884 | | |
$ | 19,221 | | |
$ | 17,723 | |
Supervision Fees | |
| 275 | | |
| 550 | | |
| 1,100 | |
Commissions | |
| 330 | | |
| 1,689 | | |
| 1,870 | |
B. Credit Facility
During 2022, Eptaprohi, Soffive, Marinouki, Marathassa,
Kerasies, Pemer and Lofou entered into a credit facility (refer to Note 8) with a financial institution for an amount up to $80,000
secured by the vessels owned by the respective subsidiaries. At the same time, all credit facilities with this financial institution
were refinanced and cancelled, namely the revolving credit facility of the Company signed in 2019 for an original amount of $20,000
and increased to $30,000 in 2020, the Lofou credit facility signed in 2020 for an original amount up to $20,000 and increased to
$25,000 in 2022, and the Eptaprohi, Soffive, Marinouki, Marathassa, Kerasies, Pemer and Petra credit facility signed in 2021 for
an original amount of up to $70,000. One of the independent members of the board of directors of the Company currently serves as
the Chief Executive Officer of this financial institution. All above transactions were evaluated and approved by the board of directors
of the Company excluding that independent member of the board of directors of the Company.
C. Principal Executive Office Lease
The Company leases office space from a company controlled
by Polys Hajioannou, at Apt. D11, Les Acanthes, 6, Avenue des Citronniers, MC98000 Monaco, where our principal executive office
is established. The office space lease contract was for a period from February 2014 until February 2023 with an annual lease payment
initially agreed in 2014 in the amount of EUR 63,000 equivalent to $67 as of December 31, 2022, adjusted annually based on the
cost of construction as published in the National Institute of Statistics & Economic Studies of Monaco, plus expenses, and
is recorded in “General and administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. In January 2023,
the office space lease contract was renewed for a period of three years with an annual lease payment in the amount of EUR 86,400.
D. Bond issuance
In February 2022, Safe Bulkers Participations successfully
completed a public offer in Greece of €100,000,000 of an unsecured bond (the “Bond”), that was admitted for trading
on the Athens Exchange under the ticker symbol SBB1 (refer to Note 8). One of the independent members of the board of directors
of the Company currently serves as the Chief Executive Officer of the financial institution that was the adviser and one of the
lead underwriters in the public offer of the Bond. The transaction was evaluated and approved by the board of directors of the
Company excluding that independent member of the board of directors of the Company.
4. Vessels, Net
Vessels, net are comprised of the following:
| |
Vessel Cost | |
Accumulated Depreciation | |
Net Book Value | |
Balance, January 1, 2021 | |
$ | 1,357,460 | |
$ | (415,296) | |
$ | 942,164 | |
Transfer from Advances for vessels | |
| 62,336 | |
| — | |
| 62,336 | |
Vessel sales | |
| (152,174) | |
| 64,207 | |
| (87,967) | |
Depreciation | |
| — | |
| (52,142) | |
| (52,142) | |
December 31, 2021 | |
$ | 1,267,622 | |
$ | (403,231) | |
$ | 864,391 | |
Transfer from Advances for vessels | |
| 165,353 | |
| — | |
| 165,353 | |
Transfer from Right-of-use asset | |
| 32,160 | |
| (1,523) | |
| 30,637 | |
Transfer to Assets held for sale | |
| (26,345) | |
| 15,301 | |
| (11,044) | |
Depreciation | |
| — | |
| (48,217) | |
| (48,217) | |
December 31, 2022 | |
$ | 1,438,790 | |
$ | (437,670) | |
$ | 1,001,120 | |
Transfer from Advances for vessels represents advances
paid for vessels under construction and vessels acquisitions which were delivered to the Company, completed vessel improvements
in respect of ballast water treatment systems (“BWTS”) and sulfur oxide exhaust gas cleaning systems (“Scrubbers”),
and vessel improvements in respect of second-hand vessels acquired and comprised:
|
~ |
During the year ended December 31, 2021: Delivery to the Company of the vessels Paraskevi 2, Koulitsa 2 and Venus Harmony and BWTS and vessel improvements on several vessels; and |
|
~ |
During the year ended December 31, 2022: Delivery to the Company of the vessels Vassos, Climate Respect, Maria, Aghia Sofia and Michalis H and BWTS and Scrubbers retrofitting and vessel improvements on several vessels. |
Transfer from Right-of-use asset in the amount of
$30,637, represents the advance payments and the initial direct costs paid for the vessel Stelios Y and the present value of the
future lease payments due under this bareboat charter amounting to $32,160 net of amortization of $1,523, were transferred to Vessel
cost and Accumulated depreciation, respectively, at the end of the bareboat charter period in November 2022, whereupon ownership
of the vessel passed to Metamou, refer to Note 7.
Transfer to Assets held for sale
during the year ended December 31, 2022 relates to the vessel Pedhoulas Trader, refer to Note 6.
Vessel sales represents the carrying
value of vessels sold during the year ended December 31, 2021 and it relates to the sale of the vessels Paraskevi, Vassos, Pedhoulas
Builder, Maria, Pedhoulas Farmer, Koulitsa and Pedhoulas Fighter, which were sold during the year ended December 31, 2021 taking
advantage of the significant market improvement. No vessels were sold during the year ended December 31, 2022. The sale of Pedhoulas
Trader was consummated in January 2023, refer to Note 23.
Consistent with prior practices,
we reviewed all our vessels for impairment and none were found to be impaired at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2022.
As of December 31, 2022, 23 vessels
owned by the Company with a carrying value of $501,547 had first priority mortgages registered as security for certain of the Company’s
loans and credit facilities, while title of ownership is held by the relevant lender for another 13 vessels with a carrying value
of $323,716 to secure the relevant sale and lease back financing transactions. See further Note 8.
5. Advances for Vessels
Advances for vessels are comprised of the following:
Balance, January 1, 2021 | |
$ | 9,126 | |
Additions for advances, including capitalized expenses and interest | |
| 109,694 | |
Transferred to vessel cost (refer to Note 4) | |
| (62,336) | |
Balance, December 31, 2021 | |
| 56,484 | |
Additions for advances, including capitalized expenses and interest | |
| 185,149 | |
Transferred to vessel cost (refer to Note 4) | |
| (165,353) | |
Balance, December 31, 2022 | |
$ | 76,280 | |
Advances paid for vessels represent
advances paid for vessel acquisitions, vessels under construction and vessel improvements and comprise payments of installments
that were due to the respective shipyard or third-party sellers, capitalized interest, certain capitalized expenses and expenditures
for major improvements and regulatory compliance. During the years ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2022, such payments
were made for the following vessels:
|
~ |
During the year ended December 31, 2021: advances for Vassos, Climate Respect, Climate Ethics, Hull 11043, Hull 11064, Hull 11065, Hull 11067, Hull 11081, Hull 1392,Paraskevi 2, Koulitsa 2, and Venus Harmony and BWTS and Scrubbers retrofitting and improvements for several vessels; and |
|
~ |
During the year ended December 31, 2022: advances for Vassos, Climate Respect, Climate Ethics, Hull 11043, Hull 1138 and Hull 1139, Maria, Michalis H, Aghia Sofia and BWTS and Scrubbers retrofitting and improvements for several vessels. |
6. Assets Held for Sale
Assets held for sale of $11,980
as of December 31, 2022, represent the carrying value of the vessel Pedhoulas Trader of $11,044 plus $936 being the value of bunkers
and lubricants onboard on the same date. A Memorandum of Agreement (“MoA”) was entered into with an unrelated third
party on September 21, 2022, for her sale at a price of $15,900, which was consummated in January 2023 on delivery of the vessel
to her new buyers. The Company, in the context of its plan to gradually renew its fleet by selling certain of its older vessels,
in September 2022, determined to dispose of this vessel and commenced seeking interested buyers. At that time, the Company concluded
that the vessel met all the criteria for an asset held for sale classification, and ceased her depreciation. As of December 31,
2022, the Company has classified as liabilities directly associated with assets held for sale the amount of $16,930, representing
the sale proceeds and the value of estimated bunkers and lubricants on board that had been received prior to the delivery of the
vessel in January 2023.
There were no assets held for sale as of December
31, 2021.
7. Right-of-use asset/Lease Liability
In July 2021, Metamou entered
into a 12 -month period bareboat charter with the third-party owners of the vessel Stelios Y. The charter included an option for
Metamou to purchase the vessel at the end of the bareboat charter period, which Metamou exercised. The vessel was delivered to
Metamou in November 2021. Pursuant to the charter, Metamou paid to the owners an advance of $9,000 as security for its correct
fulfillment, and daily charter hire of $14,500 from lease commencement until the end of the lease period. At the end of the bareboat
charter period in November 2022, Metamou paid an additional $18,000, whereupon ownership of the vessel passed to Metamou.
Right-of-use asset in the amount
of $31,938 as of December 31, 2021 represents the advance payments and the initial direct costs paid for the vessel Stelios Y and
the present value of the future lease payments due under this bareboat charter entered for the vessel during the year ended December
31, 2021, amounting to $32,160 net of amortization of $222. At the end of the bareboat charter period in November 2022, whereupon
ownership of the vessel passed to Metamou, the Right-of-use asset in the amount of $30,637, representing the advance payments and
the initial direct costs paid for the vessel Stelios Y and the present value of the future lease payments due under this bareboat
charter amounting to $32,160 net of amortization of $1,523, were transferred to Vessel cost and Accumulated depreciation, respectively.
Lease liability in the amount
of $21,945 as of December 31, 2021, represents the outstanding balance of the present value of the future lease payments under
the bareboat charter. The Company determined that the bareboat charter did not contain an implicit borrowing rate. Therefore, the
discount rate that was used for the recognition of this lease was the estimated annual incremental borrowing
rate for this type of asset which was estimated at
2.69%. The lease liability expired in November 2022.
The table below presents the components of the Company’s
finance lease expense for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2022:
| |
December 31, | |
Description | |
Location in Statement of Operations | |
2021 | | |
2022 | |
Finance lease cost: | |
| |
| | |
| |
Amortization of Right-of-use asset | |
Depreciation and amortization | |
$ | 222 | | |
$ | 1,301 | |
Interest on Lease liability | |
Interest expense | |
| 73 | | |
| 463 | |
Total | |
| |
$ | 295 | | |
$ | 1,764 | |
8. Long Term Debt
Long term debt is comprised of the following borrowings:
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
Borrower | |
Commencement | |
Maturity | |
| 2021 | | |
| 2022 | |
Eptaprohi - Soffive - Marinouki - Marathassa - Kerasies - Pemer - Petra | |
June 2021 | |
December 2022 | |
| 21,375 | | |
| — | |
Safe Bulkers | |
September 2021 | |
September 2026 | |
| 28,500 | | |
| 10,500 | |
Safe Bulkers | |
December 2021 | |
December 2026 | |
| 50,000 | | |
| 20,600 | |
Monagrouli | |
April 2020 | |
April 2027 | |
| 23,760 | | |
| 19,360 | |
Pelea - Vasstwo - Eniaprohi - Vassone | |
December 2018 | |
December 2028 | |
| 26,250 | | |
| 23,750 | |
Sub Total Credit facility | |
| |
| |
| 149,885 | | |
| 74,210 | |
Eptaprohi - Soffive - Marinouki - Marathassa - Kerasies - Pemer - Petra | |
June 2021 | |
December 2022 | |
| 10,000 | | |
| — | |
Eptaprohi - Soffive - Marinouki - Marathassa - Kerasies - Pemer - Lofou | |
December 2022 | |
June 2028 | |
| — | | |
| 15,000 | |
Sub Total Revolving credit facility | |
| |
| |
| 10,000 | | |
| 15,000 | |
Pentakomo | |
January 2020 | |
January 2023 | |
| 12,500 | | |
| 10,500 | |
Maxdekatria | |
January 2020 | |
January 2023 | |
| 12,500 | | |
| 10,500 | |
Maxdeka | |
November 2019 | |
August 2025 | |
| 17,063 | | |
| 14,978 | |
Shikoku | |
November 2019 | |
August 2025 | |
| 17,948 | | |
| 15,756 | |
Shikokutessera | |
November 2019 | |
August 2025 | |
| 17,478 | | |
| 15,384 | |
Glovertwo | |
November 2019 | |
August 2025 | |
| 16,412 | | |
| 14,412 | |
Maxtessera | |
April 2021 | |
October 2026 | |
| 28,117 | | |
| 24,798 | |
Kyotofriendo one | |
September 2022 | |
September 2027 | |
| — | | |
| 24,690 | |
Shikokuokto | |
December 2019 | |
December 2027 | |
| 16,000 | | |
| 14,000 | |
Gloversix | |
December 2019 | |
December 2027 | |
| 16,640 | | |
| 14,560 | |
Pinewood | |
February 2021 | |
February 2031 | |
| 22,567 | | |
| 20,695 | |
Shikokuepta | |
August 2021 | |
August 2031 | |
| 23,167 | | |
| 21,167 | |
Agros | |
May 2022 | |
May 2032 | |
| — | | |
| 24,943 | |
Sub Total Sale and leaseback financing | |
| |
| |
| 200,392 | | |
| 226,383 | |
Safe Bulkers Participations | |
February 2022 | |
February 2027 | |
| — | | |
| 106,985 | |
Sub Total Bond | |
| |
| |
| — | | |
| 106,985 | |
Total | |
| |
| |
| 360,277 | | |
| 422,578 | |
Current portion of long-term debt | |
| |
| |
| 41,202 | | |
| 45,722 | |
Long-term debt | |
| |
| |
| 319,075 | | |
| 376,856 | |
Total debt | |
| |
| |
| 360,277 | | |
| 422,578 | |
Current portion of deferred financing costs | |
| |
| |
| 1,290 | | |
| 2,166 | |
Deferred financing costs non-current | |
| |
| |
| 3,279 | | |
| 6,050 | |
Total deferred financing costs | |
| |
| |
| 4,569 | | |
| 8,216 | |
Total debt | |
| |
| |
| 360,277 | | |
| 422,578 | |
| |
December 31, | |
| |
| 2021 | | |
| 2022 | |
Less: Total deferred financing costs | |
| 4,569 | | |
| 8,216 | |
Total debt, net of deferred financing costs | |
| 355,708 | | |
| 414,362 | |
Less: Current portion of long-term debt, net of current portion of deferred financing costs | |
| 39,912 | | |
| 43,556 | |
Long-term debt, net
of deferred financing costs, non-current | |
| 315,796 | | |
| 370,806 | |
A. Credit Facilities & Revolving Credit Facilities
During 2018, Pelea, Vasstwo,
Eniaprohi and Vassone entered into a credit facility with a financial institution for $47,750, secured by the vessels owned by
them. The credit facility was drawn down in two tranches, a tranche of $23,075 drawn down in 2018 and a second tranche of $24,675
drawn down in 2019. During 2022, the maturity of the facility was extended to December 2028.
During 2020, Monagrouli entered
into a credit facility with a financial institution for $26,400, regarding the newbuild vessel Monagrouli had agreed to acquire.
The credit facility was drawn down in 2020 upon the delivery of the newbuild vessel.
In September 2021, Safe Bulkers
amended one of its credit facilities and agreed to a new structure for a credit facility of $60,000 secured by the vessels owned
by Eniadefhi, Maxdodeka, Gloverfour, Gloverfive and Youngone, comprising a term loan tranche of $30,000 and a reducing revolving
credit facility tranche providing for a draw down capacity of up to $30,000. The proceeds from the credit facility were used to
partially refinance loan facilities with the same financial institution of an outstanding term loan tranche of $71,139 and a revolving
credit facility tranche with a drawdown capacity of $7,000, secured by six vessels. Five of those vessels secure the new credit
facility, and the vessel owned by Shikokuexi remained debt free. As of December 31, 2022, under the reducing revolving credit facility
tranche no amount was outstanding and an amount of $30,000 was available for drawdown.
In December 2021, Safe Bulkers
entered into a credit facility of $100,000 secured by the vessels owned by Youngtwo, Shikokupente, Maxeikositessera, Maxenteka,
Maxpente and Shikokuennia, comprising a term loan tranche of $50,000 and a reducing revolving credit facility tranche providing
for a draw down capacity of up to $50,000. The proceeds were used to refinance loan facilities in the amount of $50,000 secured
by five of these vessels, and the repurchase of the vessel owned by Youngtwo under a sale and leaseback agreement. As of December
31, 2022, under the reducing revolving credit facility tranche no amount was outstanding and an amount of $50,000 was available
for drawdown.
In December 2022, Eptaprohi,
Soffive, Marinouki, Marathassa, Kerasies, Pemer and Lofou entered into a revolving reducing credit facility for an amount up to
$80,000 secured by the vessels owned by them. At the same time, all credit facilities with this financial institution were refinanced
and cancelled, namely the revolving credit facility of the Company that had been signed in 2019 for an original amount of $20,000,
the Lofou credit facility signed in 2020 for an original amount up to $20,000, increased to $25,000 in July 2022, and the Eptaprohi,
Soffive, Marinouki, Marathassa, Kerasies, Pemer and Petra credit facility and reducing revolving credit facility signed in 2021
for an original amount of up to $70,000, As of December 31, 2022, under the reducing revolving credit facility tranche an amount
of $15,000 was outstanding and an amount of $65,000 was available for drawdown.
During 2022, Shimafive entered
into a credit facility with a financial institution for $25,500, regarding the newbuild vessel Shimafive has agreed to acquire.
The credit facility will be drawn in 2023 upon delivery of the newbuild vessel.
During 2022, Shimaseven entered
into a credit facility with a financial institution for $25,500, regarding the newbuild vessel Shimaseven has agreed to acquire.
The credit facility will be drawn in 2024 upon delivery of the newbuild vessel.
B. Sale and Leaseback Financings
Sale and leaseback financing
represents financing obtained from concluding an agreement to sell the vessel and then lease her back under a bareboat charter
for a pre-determined period with either an obligation or an option to purchase (that is reasonably certain, at inception, will
be exercised) the vessel back at the end of the respective charter period or an option to purchase the respective vessel during
the charter period at predetermined purchase prices. Transactions which involve a purchase obligation (or a purchase option that
is reasonably certain, at inception, that will be exercised) are treated as a failed sale and hence represent merely a financing
arrangement. The above table includes thirteen such facilities outstanding as of December 31, 2022, whereby the relevant vessels
were formerly owned by our respective subsidiaries and ownership will revert back to the Company on settlement of the outstanding
amounts. Details of these facilities are as follows:
Each of Shikokutessera, Maxdeka, Shikoku and Glovertwo entered into a sale
and leaseback agreement in November 2019, with third party companies, subsidiaries of a financial institution, regarding the respective
vessel owned by the relevant subsidiary. The proceeds from each of these agreements were used to fully prepay the amount outstanding
under previous credit facilities secured by the respective vessels and for general corporate purposes. Under these agreements,
the respective vessel was sold and leased back on a bareboat charter basis, in the case of the vessel owned by Shikokutessera for
a period of 8 years, and in the case of the other three vessels for seven and a half years. Each respective subsidiary holds an
option to purchase back its respective vessel five years and nine months after the commencement of the respective bareboat charter.
The sale and leaseback agreements include onerous provisions for the relevant subsidiaries in the event that such options are not
exercised. The Company has verbally committed to exercise this purchase option for all four vessels. In view of this commitment
and the onerous provisions if
the options are not exercised,
the Company has assessed that these transactions be recorded as financing transactions.
Each of Shikokuokto and Gloversix
entered into a sale and leaseback agreement in December 2019, with third party companies, subsidiaries of a financial institution,
regarding the respective vessel owned by the relevant subsidiary. The proceeds from each of these agreements were used to fully
prepay the amount outstanding under previous credit facilities secured by the respective vessels and for general corporate purposes.
Under these agreements, each vessel was sold and leased back on a bareboat charter basis for a period of 8 years, with a purchase
obligation at the end of the 8th year. Furthermore, each respective subsidiary holds an option to purchase back its respective
vessel after the third year of the bareboat charter, at predetermined purchase prices. In view of the obligation of the subsidiaries
to purchase the respective vessels at the end of the bareboat charter, the Company has assessed that these transactions be recorded
as financing transactions.
Each of Pentakomo and Maxdekatria
entered into a sale and leaseback agreement in January 2020, with third party companies, subsidiaries of a financial institution,
regarding the respective vessel owned by the relevant subsidiary. The proceeds from each of these agreements were used to fully
prepay the amount outstanding under previous credit facilities secured by the respective vessels and for general corporate purposes.
Under these agreements, each vessel was sold and leased back on a bareboat charter basis for a period of 6 years, with a purchase
obligation at the end of the 6th year. Furthermore, each respective subsidiary held an option to purchase back its respective vessel
after the third year of the bareboat charter, at predetermined purchase prices. In view of the obligation of the subsidiaries to
purchase the respective vessels at the end of the bareboat charter, the Company has assessed that these transactions be recorded
as financing transactions. In January 2023, both Pentakomo and Maxdekatria exercised their respective purchase options, repaid
all outstandings under the sale and leaseback agreements and took ownership of the respective vessels.
Pinewood entered into a sale
and leaseback agreement in January 2021, consummated in February 2021, with an unrelated third party, regarding the vessel owned
by Pinewood. The proceeds were used for the redemption of all issued and outstanding shares of Pinewood’s series A cumulative
redeemable perpetual preferred stock that had been previously issued to a third party investor and for general corporate purposes.
Under the agreement, the vessel was sold and leased back on a bareboat charter basis for a period of 10 years, with a purchase
obligation at the end of the 10th year. Furthermore, Pinewood holds an option to purchase back the vessel after the third year
of the bareboat charter, at predetermined purchase prices. In view of the obligation of Pine-wood to purchase the vessel at the
end of the bareboat charter, the Company has assessed that this transaction be recorded as financing transaction.
Maxtessera entered into a sale
and leaseback agreement in March 2021, consummated in April 2021, with a third party company, subsidiary of a financial institution,
regarding the vessel owned by Maxtessera. The proceeds from this agreement were used to fully prepay the amount outstanding under
a previous credit facility secured by the vessel and for general corporate purposes. Under this agreement, the vessel was sold
and leased back on a bareboat charter basis for a period of 7 years. Maxtessera holds an option to purchase back its vessel five
years and six months after the commencement of the bareboat charter. The sale and leaseback agreement includes onerous provisions
for the subsidiary in the event that such option is not exercised. The Company has verbally committed to exercise this purchase
option. In view of this commitment and the onerous provisions where the option was not exercised, the Company has assessed that
this transaction be recorded as a financing transaction.
Shikokuepta entered into a sale
and leaseback agreement in July 2021, consummated in August 2021, with an unrelated third party, regarding the vessel owned by
Shikokuepta. The proceeds were used for general corporate purposes. Under the agreement, the vessel was sold and leased back on
a bareboat charter basis for a period of 10 years, with a purchase obligation at the end of the 10th year. Furthermore, Shikokuepta
holds an option to purchase back the vessel after the third year of the bareboat charter, at predetermined purchase prices. In
view of the obligation of Shikokuepta to purchase the vessel at the end of the bareboat charter, the Company has assessed that
this transaction be recorded as financing transaction.
Agros entered into a sale and
leaseback agreement in October 2020, with an unrelated third party, regarding the newbuild vessel Agros had agreed to acquire.
The transaction was consummated in May 2022 upon delivery of the vessel to Agros. Under the agreement, the vessel was sold and
leased back on a bareboat charter basis for a period of 10 years, with a purchase obligation at the end of the 10th year. Furthermore,
Agros holds an option to purchase back the vessel after the third year of the bareboat charter, at predetermined purchase prices.
In view of the obligation of Agros to purchase the vessel at the end of the bareboat charter, the Company has assessed that this
transaction be recorded as a financing transaction.
Kyotofriendo One entered into
a sale and leaseback agreement, with an unrelated third party in 2022 for $25,750, regarding the second-hand vessel Kyotofriendo
One acquired during 2022. Under the agreement, the vessel was sold and leased back on a bareboat charter basis for a period of
five years, with a purchase obligation at the end of the fifth year. Furthermore, Kyotofriendo One holds an option to purchase
back the vessel after the third year of the bareboat charter, at predetermined purchase prices. In view of the obligation of Kyotofriendo
One to purchase the vessel at the end of the bareboat charter, the Company has assessed that this transaction be recorded as a
financing transaction.
Two other similar facilities
were fully repaid during the year ended December 31, 2021. Each of Maxeikosiena and Youngtwo had entered into a sale and leaseback
agreement in 2015 and 2017, respectively, with third party companies, subsidiaries of a financial institution, regarding the respective
vessel owned by the relevant subsidiary. The proceeds from the agreement entered by Maxeikosiena were used to fully prepay the
amount outstanding under a previous credit facility secured by the respective vessel, and the proceeds from the agreement entered
into by Youngtwo were used for general corporate purposes. Under these agreements, each vessel was sold and leased back on a bareboat
charter basis for a period of 10 years, with a purchase obligation at the end of the 10th year. Furthermore, each subsidiary held
an option to purchase back the respective vessel after the second year of the bareboat charter, at annual intervals and predetermined
purchase prices. In view of the obligation of the subsidiaries to purchase the respective vessels at the end of the bareboat charter,
the Company had assessed that these transactions be
recorded as financing transactions.
Both Maxeikosiena and Youngtwo exercised the options and bought back the vessels during the year ended December 31, 2021.
Our financing facilities bear
interest at LIBOR or SOFR as the case may be plus a margin, except for the Kyotofriendo One sale and leaseback transaction and
a portion of each of Shikokutessera, Maxdeka, Shikoku, Glovertwo and Maxtessera sale and leaseback transactions. A portion of each
of the Shikokutessera, Maxdeka, Shikoku, Glovertwo and Maxtessera financing facilities are deemed to incur interest at a fixed
rate calculated so that the initial facility amount be amortized to maturity down to the purchase option price of each vessel.
Our financing facilities are
generally repayable by monthly or quarterly principal installments and a balloon payment due on maturity. The fair value of debt
outstanding on December 31, 2022 amounted to $315,519 when valuing the Shikokutessera, Maxdeka, Shikoku, Glovertwo, Maxtessera
and Kyotofriendo One loan facilities on the basis of the deemed equivalent fixed rate, as applicable on December 31, 2022, which
are considered to be Level 2 items in accordance with the fair value hierarchy.
In addition to the Shimafive
and Shimaseven financings noted above, which will be available upon delivery of the respective vessels, as of December 31, 2022,
a total amount of $145,000 was available for drawdown under the reducing revolving credit facility and reducing revolving credit
facility tranches.
Our loan and credit facilities
were secured as follows:
|
~ |
First priority mortgages over the vessels owned by the Company or title of ownership for the vessels under sale and lease back finance arrangements; |
|
~ |
First priority assignment of all insurances and earnings of the relevant vessels; |
|
~ |
Guarantee from Safe Bulkers in respect of facilities entered into by the Subsidiaries. |
The financing agreements contain
debt covenants including restrictions as to changes in management and ownership of the vessels, entering into certain long-term
charters, additional indebtedness and mortgaging of vessels without the respective lender’s prior consent, minimum vessel
insurance cover ratio requirements, as well as minimum fair vessel value ratio to outstanding loan principal requirements (the
“Minimum Value Covenant”). The Minimum Value Covenant must not fall below 112%, 115%, 120% or 135% as the case may
be. The borrowers are permitted to pay dividends to their owners as long as no event of default under the respective loan has occurred
or has not been remedied or would occur as a result of the payment of such dividends.
Certain of the financing agreements
require the respective borrowers to maintain at all times a minimum balance in each vessel operating account, from $200 to $500.
The Safe Bulkers facilities and
the corporate guarantees of the Company include the following financial covenants:
|
~ |
total consolidated liabilities divided by total consolidated assets (based on the market value of all vessels owned or leased on a finance lease taking into account their employment, and the book value of all other assets), must not exceed 85% (the “Consolidated Leverage Covenant”); |
|
~ |
total consolidated assets (based on the market value of all vessels owned or leased on a finance lease taking into account their employment, and the book value of all other assets) less its total consolidated liabilities must not be less than $150,000 (the “Net Worth Covenant”); |
|
~ |
the ratio of EBITDA over consolidated interest expense must not be less than 2.0:1, on a trailing 12 months’ basis (the “EBITDA Covenant”); |
|
~ |
a minimum of 30% or 35%, as per the relevant agreement, of its voting and ownership rights shall remain directly or indirectly beneficially owned by the Hajioannou family for the duration of the relevant credit facilities and in the case of one facility Polys Hajioannou beneficially holds a minimum of 20% of the voting and ownership rights (the “Control Covenant”); and |
|
~ |
payment of dividends is subject to no event of default having occurred and be continuing or would occur as a result of the payment of such dividends. |
The Minimum Value Covenant, Consolidated
Leverage Covenant, EBITDA Covenant, Net Worth Covenant and Control Covenant do not apply to the Pinewood, Shikokuepta, Agros and
Kyotofriendo One financing agreements. The EBITDA Covenant does not apply to the Shikokuokto, Gloversix, Pentakomo and Maxdekatria
financing agreements and to the Monagrouli loan facility. The Minimum Value Covenant does not apply to the Maxdeka, Shikoku, Shikokutessera,
Glovertwo and Maxtessera financing agreements.
As of December 31, 2022, the
Company was in compliance with all debt covenants in effect, with respect to its financing facilities.
C. Unsecured Bond
In February 2022, the Company,
through its wholly owned subsidiary, Safe Bulkers Participations Plc (the “Issuer”), issued €100,000,000 of unsecured
bonds to investors and listed the bonds on the Athens Exchange (the “Bond”). The Bond matures in February 2027 and
carries a coupon of 2.95%, payable semi-annually. The bond offering was completed on February 11, 2022, and the trading of the
bonds on the Athens Exchange commenced on February 14, 2022.
The Bond can be called in part
(pro rata) or in full by the Issuer on any coupon payment date, after the second anniversary and until six months prior to maturity.
If the Bond is redeemed (in part or in full) on i) the 5th and/or 6th coupon payment date, bondholders will receive a premium
of 1.5% on the nominal amount of the bond redeemed, ii) the 7th and/or 8th coupon payment date, bondholders will receive a premium
of 0.5% on the nominal amount of the bond redeemed; no premium shall be paid for a redemption occurring on the 9th coupon payment
date. In case there is a material change in the tax treatment of the Bond for the Issuer, then the Issuer has the right, at any
time, to fully prepay the Bond without paying any premium. The Issuer can exercise the early redemption right in part, one or more
times, by prepaying each time a nominal amount of bonds equal to at least €10,000,000, provided that the remaining nominal
amount of the bonds after the early redemption is not lower than €50,000,000.
As of December 31, 2022, the outstanding balance of
the Bond amounted to $106,985. The fair value of the Bond determined through Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy as at December
31, 2022, amounted to €96,000,000 or $102,706.
The Bond includes the following financial covenants
for the Company:
|
~ |
total consolidated liabilities divided by total consolidated assets (based on the market value of all vessels owned or leased on a finance lease taking into account their employment, and the book value of all other assets), must not exceed 85%; |
|
~ |
total consolidated assets (based on the market value of all vessels owned or leased on a finance lease taking into account their employment, and the book value of all other assets) less its total consolidated liabilities must not be less than $150,000; |
|
~ |
the ratio of EBITDA over consolidated interest expense must not be less than 2.0:1, on a trailing 12 months’ basis; and |
|
~ |
a minimum of 30% of its voting and ownership rights shall remain directly or indirectly beneficially owned by the Hajioannou family for the duration of the Bond. |
As of December 31, 2022, the Company was in compliance
with all covenants in effect, with respect to the Bond.
The estimated minimum annual principal payments required
to be made after December 31, 2022, based on the above credit facilities, sale and leaseback financings and the Bond are as follows:
To December 31, |
|
|
|
2023 |
|
$ |
45,722 |
2024 |
|
|
26,069 |
2025 |
|
|
76,373 |
2026 |
|
|
50,725 |
2027 |
|
|
155,227 |
2028 and thereafter |
|
|
68,462 |
Total |
|
$ |
422,578 |
Total interest incurred on long-term debt for the
years ended December 31, 2020, December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2022 amounted to $21,417, $14,776 and $17,651, respectively,
which includes interest capitalized of $184, $57 and $513 for the years ended December 31, 2020, December 31, 2021 and December
31, 2022, respectively. The average interest rate (including the margin in the case of credit facilities and sale and leaseback
financings) for all long-term debt during the years December 31, 2020, December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2022 was 3.382% p.a.,
2.642% p.a. and 3.255% p.a., respectively.
9. Share Capital
As of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2022, the
Company had 200,000,000 shares of authorized common stock of $0.001 par value, of which 121,640,839 and 118,868,317 were issued
and outstanding respectively.
Each outstanding share of common stock entitles the
holder to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders. Subject to preferences that may be applicable to any outstanding
shares of preferred stock, holders of shares of common stock are entitled to receive ratably all dividends, if any, declared by
the Company’s board of directors out of funds legally available for dividends. Upon the Company’s dissolution or liquidation
or the sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, after payment in full of all amounts required to be paid
to creditors and to the holders of preferred stock having liquidation preferences, if any, the holders of the common stock will
be entitled to receive pro rata the remaining assets available for distribution. Holders of common stock do not have conversion,
redemption or preemptive rights to subscribe to any of the Company’s securities. All outstanding shares of common stock are
fully paid and non-assessable. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of common stock are subject to the rights of the
holders of any shares of preferred stock which may be issued. The Company’s common stock is not subject to any sinking fund
provisions and no holder of any shares will be required to make additional contributions of capital with respect to the Company’s
shares in the future. There are no provisions in the Company’s articles of incorporation or bylaws discriminating against
a shareholder because of his or her ownership of a particular number of shares.
As of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2022, the
Company had 20,000,000 shares of authorized preferred stock of $0.01 par value, of which 2,297,504 and 804,950 Series C Cumulative
Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares (the “Series C Preferred Shares”), respectively, and 3,195,050 and 3,195,050
Series D Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares (the “Series D Preferred Shares” and, together with the Series
C Preferred Shares, the “Preferred Shares”), respectively, were issued and outstanding, respectively. In addition,
one million shares have been designated Series A Participating Preferred Stock in connection with our adoption of a shareholder
rights plan.
Holders of Preferred Shares have no voting rights
other than the ability (voting together as a class with all other classes or series of preferred stock upon which like voting rights
have been conferred and are exercisable, including all of the Preferred Shares), subject to certain exceptions, to elect one director
if dividends for six quarterly dividend periods (whether or not consecutive) payable on the Company’s Preferred Shares are
in arrears and certain other limited protective voting rights. The Company’s Preferred Shares are subordinate to all of existing
and future indebtedness.
Common stock
In November 2019, and April 2020 the Company issued
to an unaffiliated third party 3,963,964, and 2,951,699 shares of common stock to pay the second and fourth installment of $6,600,
and $3,300, respectively, of the purchase price of the Troodos Oak.
In December 2019, the Company implemented a new program
for the repurchase of an amount of up to 1,500,000 shares of its common stock. In March 2020, the Company terminated the program,
having repurchased and canceled an amount of 1,500,000 shares of common stock during the first quarter of 2020.
In March 2020, the Company implemented a new program
for the repurchase of an amount of up to 2,000,000 shares of its common stock, which was expanded for an additional 2,000,000 shares
of its common stock. In June 2020, the Company terminated the program, having repurchased and canceled an amount of 3,624,283 shares
of common stock.
In August 2020, the Company filed a prospectus supplement
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, under which it may offer and sell shares of its common stock from time to time up
to aggregate net offering proceeds of $23,500 through an “at-the-market” equity offering program (the “ATM Program”).
In May 2021, the Company filed an addendum to the August 2020 prospectus supplement and increased its net offering proceeds to
$100,000. As of December 31, 2022, the Company had offered to sell and had sold 19,417,280 shares and had received aggregate net
offering proceeds of $71,537 under the ATM Program. As of February 24, 2023, the Company had not offered to sell and had not
sold any additional common shares under the ATM Program.
In June 2022, the Company authorized a program under
which it may from time to time purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of its common stock. As of February 24, 2023, 2,807,418 shares
of common stock had been repurchased and cancelled under the repurchase program.
Pursuant to arrangements approved by the Company’s
shareholders and the nominating and compensation committee, effective July 1, 2008, in respect of the audit committee chairman
and effective January 1, 2010, in respect of the other independent directors of the Company, every quarter the audit committee
chairman receives the equivalent of $15 and the other independent directors each receive the equivalent of $7.50, all payable in
arrears in the form of newly issued Company common stock as part compensation for services rendered as audit committee chairman
and independent directors, respectively. The number of shares to be issued is determined based on the closing price of the Company’s
common stock on the last trading day prior to the end of each quarter in which services were provided and the shares are issued
as soon as practicable following the end of the quarter. During the years ended December 31, 2020, December 31, 2021 and December
31, 2022, 48,079 shares, 24,483 shares and 17,448 shares, respectively, were issued to the audit committee chairman and 48,079
shares, 24,482 shares and 17,448 shares, respectively, were issued in aggregate to the two other independent directors of the Company.
Preferred stock
In May 2014, the Company successfully completed a
public offering, whereby 2,300,000 shares of Series C Preferred shares were issued and sold at a price of $25.00 per share. The
net proceeds of the public offering and the private placement were $55,504, net of underwriting discount of $1,744 and offering
expenses of $252. The Series C Preferred Shares were issued for cash and pay cumulative quarterly dividends at a rate of 8% per
annum from their date of issuance, i.e. $2.00 per preferred share. The declaration of such dividend is subject to the discretion
of the Company’s board of directors. At any time on or after May 31, 2019, the Series C Preferred Shares may be redeemed,
at the option of the Company, in whole or in part at a redemption price of $25.00 per share plus unpaid dividends. The Series C
Preferred Shares are not convertible into common stock and are not redeemable at the option of the holder.
In June 2014, the Company successfully completed a
public offering, whereby 3,200,000 shares of Series D Preferred Shares were issued and sold at a price of $25.00 per share. The
net proceeds of the public offering and the private placement were $77,420 net of underwriting discount of $2,369 and offering
expenses of $211. The Series D Preferred Shares were issued for cash and pay cumulative quarterly dividends at a rate of 8% per
annum from their date of issuance, i.e., $2.00 per preferred share. The declaration of such dividend is subject to the discretion
of the Company’s board of directors. At any time on or after June 30, 2019, the Series D Preferred Shares may be redeemed,
at the option of the Company, in whole or in part at a redemption price of $25.00 per share plus unpaid dividends. The Series D
Preferred Shares are not convertible into common stock and are not redeemable at the option of the holder.
In March 2020, the Company implemented a program for
the repurchase of up to 100,000 Series C Preferred Shares and up to 100,000 Series D Preferred Shares on the open market. Under
the statement of designation of the respective series of preferred shares, any such shares repurchased by the Company were canceled.
As of December 31, 2022, 2,496 Series C Preferred Shares and 4,950 Series D Preferred Shares had been repurchased and canceled
under this repurchase program.
In March 2022, the Company issued a notice of redemption
of 1,492,554 of the outstanding Series C Preferred Shares. The redemption was completed on April 29, 2022, at a redemption price
of $25.00 per Series C Preferred Share in the amount of $37,314 plus all accumulated and unpaid dividends to, but excluding, the
redemption date, of $738. Following the redemption, there were 804,950 Series C Preferred Shares outstanding, as of December 31,
2022.
The payment due upon liquidation to holders of any
series of the Company’s preferred shares is fixed at the redemption preference of $25.00 per share plus accumulated and unpaid
dividends to the date of liquidation. The liquidation price of the Series C Preferred Shares and Series D Preferred Shares as of
December 31, 2022 was $20,405 and $80,995, respectively.
10. Mezzanine Equity
Mezzanine equity represents the USD equivalent of
100 shares of Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Shares”) of our subsidiary
Pinewood issued in June 2018 to an unaffiliated third party investor (the “Investor”) in the amount of JPY1,854,900,000
plus accrued dividend. These shares were issued as partial payment for the cost of the vessel Pedhoulas Cedrus owned by Pinewood.
The Investor was entitled to a dividend of 2.95% p.a. from these shares.
In February 2021, Pinewood, after giving due notification,
exercised its option and redeemed all Series A Preferred Shares, pay-
ing at the time to the Investor
a liquidation price of JPY1,854,900,000, equivalent to $17,707 and accumulated dividends of JPY8,395,328 equivalent to $79 up to
the date of liquidation.
11. Commitments and Contingencies
(a) Capital expenditure commitments relating to our
vessels and vessels under construction are as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | |
Due to Ship- yards/Sellers | | |
Due to Manager | | |
Other Commitments | | |
Total | |
2023 | |
$ |
147,840 | | |
$ |
4,971 | | |
$ |
2,724 | | |
$ |
155,535 | |
2024 | |
| 72,429 | | |
| 1,834 | | |
| — | | |
| 74,263 | |
2025 | |
| 15,811 | | |
| 624 | | |
| — | | |
| 16,435 | |
Total | |
$ | 236,080 | | |
$ | 7,429 | | |
$ | 2,724 | | |
$ | 246,233 | |
Other commitments represent contracted
costs related to the purchase of BWTS and Scrubbers to be installed on certain of the fleet vessels.
(b) Other contingent liabilities
The Company and its Subsidiaries
have not been involved in any legal proceedings that may have, or have had, a significant effect on their business, financial position,
results of operations or liquidity, nor is the Company aware of any proceedings that are pending or threatened that may have a
significant effect on its business, financial position, results of operations or liquidity. From time to time various claims, suits
and complaints, including those involving government regulations and product liability, arise in the ordinary course of the shipping
business. In addition, losses may arise from disputes with charterers, agents, shipyards, insurance providers and other claims
relating to the operation of the Company’s vessels. Management is not aware of any material claims or contingent liabilities
which should be disclosed, or for which a provision should be established in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
The Company accrues for the cost
of environmental liabilities when management becomes aware that a liability is probable and is able to reasonably estimate the
probable exposure. Management is not aware of any such claims or contingent liabilities which should be disclosed, or for which
a provision should be established in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. A maximum of $1,000,000 of the liabilities
associated with the individual vessel actions, mainly for sea pollution, is covered by P&I Club insurance.
12. Revenues
Revenues are comprised of the following:
| |
Year Ended December 31 | | |
| |
| |
2020 | | |
2021 | | |
2022 | |
Time charter revenue | |
$ | 198,382 | | |
$ | 328,905 | | |
$ | 351,006 | |
Voyage charter revenue | |
| 2,603 | | |
| 5,578 | | |
| — | |
Other income | |
| 5,050 | | |
| 8,992 | | |
| 13,044 | |
Total | |
$ | 206,035 | | |
$ | 343,475 | | |
$ | 364,050 | |
The Company generates its revenues
from time charters or infrequently under voyage contracts.
Time charter agreements may have
renewal options for one to 12 months. The time charter party generally provides typical warranties regarding the speed and the
performance of the vessel as well as some owner protective restrictions such that the vessel is sent only to safe ports by the
charterer, subject always to compliance with applicable sanction laws, and carry only lawful and non-hazardous cargo. The Company
typically enters into time charters ranging from one month to five years and in isolated cases on longer terms depending on market
conditions. The charterer has the full discretion over the ports visited, shipping routes and vessel speed, subject only to the
owner protective restrictions discussed above.
Vessels may also be chartered
under voyage charters, where a contract is made for the use of a vessel under which the Company is paid freight on the basis of
moving cargo from a loading port to a discharge port. A significant portion of the voyage hire is typically paid upon initiation
of the voyage and the remainder upon completion of the performance obligation.
During the years ended December
31, 2020, 2021 and 2022, the Company generated revenue from its time charters of $198,382, $328,905 and $351,006, respectively.
Scrubber -fitted vessels are able to earn a premium attributable to the use of the scrubbers installed on board the vessels, to
reduce the sulfur content of fuels due to new legislation effective January 1, 2020. This premium can be fixed as part of the daily
charter rate or can vary based on actual consumption, such variable consideration amounted to $16,331, $13,710 and $29,628 and
is included in time charter revenue for the year ended December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively.
As of December 31, 2022, the
time charters under which the Company vessels were employed had remaining term ranging from less than one month to twelve months
based on the minimum duration of the contracts, excluding eleven vessels, four of which were employed under time charters for an
original duration of three years, six of which were employed under time charters for an original duration of five years and one
vessel which was on long term time charter for a period of twenty years, with a remaining tenor ranging between 2 to 9 years.
As of December 31, 2022, and
December 31, 2021 no vessel was employed under a voyage charter. As of December 31, 2020, one of the voyage charters that began
during the year was in progress and ended after December 31, 2020, and one voyage charter entered in December 2020, had not initiated
the performance obligation, i.e., the relevant vessel had not arrived at the loading port. As of December 31, 2020, contract assets
representing voyage costs of $38, incurred between the contract date and the date of the vessel’s arrival at the loading
port were included in prepaid expenses and other current assets which were expensed in 2021. As of December 31, 2020, the aggregate
amount of the transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligation was $222, all of which had been collected as
of December 31, 2020, and the entity recognized this revenue over the time of the voyage until its completion in the first quarter
of 2021.
13. Vessel Operating Expenses
Vessel operating expenses are
comprised of the following:
| |
Year Ended December 31, |
| |
2020 | | |
2021 | | |
2022 | |
Crew wages and related costs | |
$ | 34,364 | | |
$ | 36,821 | | |
$ | 38,083 | |
Insurance | |
| 3,380 | | |
| 3,601 | | |
| 4,749 | |
Repairs, maintenance and drydocking costs | |
| 10,097 | | |
| 8,797 | | |
| 12,148 | |
Spares, stores and provisions | |
| 14,921 | | |
| 15,473 | | |
| 16,623 | |
Lubricants | |
| 4,059 | | |
| 3,846 | | |
| 5,068 | |
Taxes | |
| 642 | | |
| 690 | | |
| 674 | |
Miscellaneous | |
| 2,623 | | |
| 2,821 | | |
| 2,866 | |
Total | |
$ | 70,086 | | |
$ | 72,049 | | |
$ | 80,211 | |
14. Fair Value of Financial
Instruments and Derivatives Instruments
Cash and cash equivalents and
restricted cash and interest rate, foreign exchange forward contracts, bunker price and freight derivatives are recorded at fair
value. The carrying values of the current financial assets and current financial liabilities are reasonable estimates of their
fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments. Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash are considered
Level 1 items as they represent liquid assets with short-term maturities. The fair values of the variable interest long-term debt
approximate the recorded values, due to their variable interest rates. The fair value of the fixed interest long-term debt is estimated
using prevailing market rates as of the period end. The Company believes the terms of its loans are similar to those that could
be procured as of December 31, 2022. The fair value of the long-term debt is disclosed in Note 8.
Derivative instruments
Interest rate swaps
The Company from time to time
enters into interest rate derivative contracts to manage interest costs and risk associated with changing interest rates with respect
to its variable interest loans and credit facilities. During the year ended December 31, 2022 the Company terminated all interest
rate derivative contracts that it or its subsidiaries had previously entered into. As a result there were no interest rate derivative
contracts outstanding as of December 31, 2022. Details of interest rate swap contracts entered into as of December 31, 2021 are
presented in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount |
Counterparty
(1) |
|
Inception |
|
Expiry |
|
Fixed Rate |
|
December 31, 2021 |
|
December 31, 2022 |
SAFE BULKERS |
|
March 4, 2020 |
|
September 30, 2024 |
|
0.9900% |
|
10,000 |
|
— |
SAFE BULKERS |
|
March 4, 2020 |
|
September 30, 2024 |
|
0.9000% |
|
10,000 |
|
— |
SAFE BULKERS |
|
March 9, 2020 |
|
September 30, 2024 |
|
0.8000% |
|
10,000 |
|
— |
SAFE BULKERS |
|
March 10, 2020 |
|
September 30, 2024 |
|
0.6500% |
|
20,000 |
|
— |
SAFE BULKERS (2) |
|
March 30, 2020 |
|
September 30, 2024 |
|
0.6000% |
|
10,000 |
|
— |
SAFE BULKERS |
|
May 5, 2020 |
|
May 5, 2025 |
|
0.4000% |
|
10,000 |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount |
Counterparty (1) |
|
Inception |
|
Expiry |
|
Fixed Rate |
|
December 31, 2021 |
|
December 31, 2022 |
SAFE BULKERS |
|
July 10, 2020 |
|
May 5, 2025 |
|
0.4000% |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
— |
SAFE BULKERS |
|
July 10, 2020 |
|
May 5, 2025 |
|
0.3800% |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
— |
SAFE BULKERS |
|
July 14, 2020 |
|
May 5, 2025 |
|
0.3800% |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
— |
SAFE BULKERS |
|
June 4, 2020 |
|
June 4, 2025 |
|
0.5000% |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
— |
SAFE BULKERS |
|
June 11, 2020 |
|
June 11, 2025 |
|
0.4500% |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
— |
SAFE BULKERS |
|
June 15, 2020 |
|
June 15, 2025 |
|
0.4000% |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
— |
SAFE BULKERS |
|
June 30, 2020 |
|
June 30, 2025 |
|
0.4250% |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
— |
SAFE BULKERS |
|
July 1, 2020 |
|
July 1, 2025 |
|
0.3800% |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
— |
SAFE BULKERS |
|
July 9, 2020 |
|
July 9, 2025 |
|
0.3600% |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
— |
SAFE BULKERS |
|
July 16, 2020 |
|
July 16, 2025 |
|
0.3500% |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
— |
SAFE BULKERS |
|
July 30, 2020 |
|
July 30, 2025 |
|
0.3300% |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
— |
SAFE BULKERS |
|
August 3, 2020 |
|
August 3, 2025 |
|
0.3700% |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
— |
SAFE BULKERS |
|
February 22, 2021 |
|
December 31, 2025 |
|
0.7450% |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
— |
SAFE BULKERS |
|
May 10, 2021 |
|
May 11, 2026 |
|
0.9500% |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
— |
SAFE BULKERS |
|
July 21, 2021 |
|
July 21, 2026 |
|
0.8290% |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
— |
SAFE BULKERS |
|
July 22, 2021 |
|
July 22, 2026 |
|
0.7700% |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
— |
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
$ |
— |
(1) |
Under all above swap transactions, the counterparty
bank effects quarterly floating-rate payments to the Company for the relevant amount based on the three-month USD LIBOR, and
the Company effects quarterly payments to the bank on the relevant amount at the respective fixed rates. |
(2) |
The notional amounts of the above transactions are reduced
during the term of the swap transactions based on the expected principal outstanding under the respective facility. |
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts
The Company from time to time
may enter into foreign exchange forward contracts to create economic hedges for its exposure to currency exchange risk on payments
relating to capital expenditure obligations, the redemption of the Bond or for trading purposes. Foreign exchange forward contracts
are agreements entered into with a bank to exchange, at a specified future date, currencies of different countries at a specific
rate. As of December 31, 2022, the Company had four outstanding derivative instruments relating to currency exchange contracts
for an aggregate amount of €40,000,000 or $43,384, entered into during the year ended December 31, 2022 with maturity in November
2026. As of December 31, 2021, there were no outstanding derivative instruments relating to currency exchange contracts.
Bunker Fuel Contracts
During the years ended December
31, 2021 and December 31, 2022, the Company entered into a certain number of contracts to buy or sell the spread differential between
the price per ton of the 0.5% and 3.5% sulfur content fuel with the objective of reducing the risk arising from lower spread differential,
which affects the additional revenue from the operation of Scrubbers in scrubber-fitted vessels.
Forward Freight Agreements (“FFA”)
During the years ended December
31, 2021 and December 31, 2022, the Company entered into a certain number of FFA on the Panamax index maturing in 2022 and 2023
with the objective of reducing the risk arising from the volatility in the vessel charter rates.
The Company’s interest
rate agreements, foreign exchange forward contracts, bunker fuel contracts and FFA do not qualify for hedge accounting. The Company
determines the fair market value of such derivative contracts at the end of every period and accordingly records the resulting
unrealized loss/gain during the period in the consolidated statement of operations.
Information on the location and
amounts of derivative fair values in the consolidated balance sheets and derivative gains/losses in the consolidated statements
of operations are shown below:
Derivatives not designated as
hedging instruments
| |
| |
Asset Derivatives Fair Values | |
Liability Derivatives Fair Values |
Type of Contract | |
Balance sheet location | |
December 31, 2021 | |
December 31, 2022 | |
December 31, 2021 | |
December 31, 2022 | |
Bunker Fuel | |
Derivative assets/ Current assets | |
$ | 9 | |
$ | 343 | |
$ | — | |
$ | — | |
Forward Freight | |
Derivative assets/ Current assets | |
| 1,139 | |
| 755 | |
| — | |
| — | |
Interest Rate | |
Derivative assets / Non-current assets | |
| 5,879 | |
| — | |
| — | |
| — | |
Foreign Currency | |
Derivative assets / Non-current assets | |
| — | |
| 1,156 | |
| — | |
| — | |
Bunker Fuel | |
Derivative liabilities / Current liabilities | |
| — | |
| — | |
| 258 | |
| — | |
Forward Freight | |
Derivative liabilities / Current liabilities | |
| — | |
| — | |
| 156 | |
| — | |
Foreign Currency | |
Derivative liabilities / Non-current liabilities | |
| — | |
| — | |
| — | |
| 307 | |
| |
Total Derivatives | |
$ | 7,027 | |
$ | 2,254 | |
$ | 414 | |
$ | 307 | |
| |
Amount of (Loss)/Gain Recognized on Derivatives
Year ended December 31, | |
| |
2020 | |
2021 | |
2022 | |
Forward Freight | |
$ | (174) | |
$ | (3,227) | |
$ | 7,066 | |
Foreign Currency | |
| 99 | |
| (99) | |
| 862 | |
Interest Rate Contracts | |
| (1,379) | |
| 6,474 | |
| 5,327 | |
Bunker Fuel Contracts | |
| 151 | |
| (960) | |
| (4,532) | |
Net (Loss)/Gain Recognized | |
$ | (1,303) | |
$ | 2,188 | |
$ | 8,723 | |
The gain or loss is recognized
in the consolidated statement of operations and is presented in Other (Expense)/Income – Gain/ (Loss) on derivatives.
The Company’s interest
rate derivative instruments are pay-fixed, receive-variable interest rate swaps based on the USD LIBOR swap rate. The fair value
of the interest rate swaps is determined using a discounted cash flow approach based on expected forward LIBOR swap yield curves
and take into account the credit risk of the counterparty financial institutions. LIBOR swap rates are observable at commonly quoted
intervals for the full terms of the swaps and therefore are considered Level 2 items in accordance with the fair value hierarchy.
Differences in prices are observable at commonly quoted intervals for the full terms of the swaps and therefore are considered
Level 2 items in accordance with the fair value hierarchy.
The Company’s foreign exchange
forward derivative instruments are agreements entered into with a bank to exchange, at a specified future date, currencies of different
countries at a specific rate. The fair value of the foreign exchange forward derivative instruments is determined using mid-rates
based on available market rates at the time of the valuation and take into account the credit risk of the counterparty financial
institutions. Foreign exchange prices are observable at commonly quoted intervals for the full terms of the foreign exchange forward
derivative instruments and therefore are considered Level 2 items in accordance with the fair value hierarchy.
The Company’s FFA derivative
instruments were receive-fixed, pay-variable swaps based on the earnings of the Panamax class dry bulk vessels as published by
the Baltic Exchange. The fair value of the FFA derivatives is determined using a discounted cash flow approach based on the market
rate of such earnings at the time of such valuation and take into account the credit risk of the counterparty financial institutions.
Differences in prices are observable at commonly quoted intervals for the full terms of the FFAs and therefore are considered Level
2 items in accordance with the fair value hierarchy.
The Company’s bunker fuel
derivative instruments were receive-fixed, pay-variable swaps based on the difference in price between various categories of bunker
fuels. The fair value of the bunker fuel swaps is determined using a discounted cash flow approach based on the difference on the
market rate of each bunker fuel price at the time of such valuation and take into account the credit risk of the counterparty financial
institutions. Differences in prices are observable at commonly quoted intervals for the full terms of the swaps and therefore are
considered Level 2 items in accordance with the fair value hierarchy.
The following table summarizes
the valuation of the Company’s financial instruments as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2022.
| |
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | |
| |
December 31, 2021 | |
December 31, 2022 | |
Derivative instruments – asset position | |
$ | 7,027 | |
$ | 2,254 | |
Derivative instruments – liability position | |
| 414 | |
| 307 | |
15. Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities are comprised
of the following:
| |
December 31, | |
| |
2021 | |
2022 | |
Interest on long-term debt | |
$ | 420 | |
$ | 2,235 | |
Vessels’ operating and voyage expenses | |
| 2,824 | |
| 7,305 | |
Commissions | |
| 315 | |
| 464 | |
Interest on derivatives and other finance expenses | |
| 1,600 | |
| 635 | |
General and administrative expenses | |
| 212 | |
| 127 | |
Total | |
$ | 5,371 | |
$ | 10,766 | |
16. Future Minimum Time Charter
Revenue
The future minimum time charter
revenue, net of commissions, based on vessels committed to non-cancellable period time charter contracts (including fixture recaps)
which includes contracted revenue linked to the BPI and BCI index calculated as of December 31, 2022, is as follows:
December 31, |
2023 | |
$ | 119,311 | |
2024 | |
| 65,901 | |
2025 | |
| 41,682 | |
2026 | |
| 16,934 | |
2027 | |
| 10,304 | |
Thereafter | |
| 32,560 | |
Total | |
$ | 286,692 | |
Revenues from time charters are
not generally received when a vessel is off-hire, including time required for normal periodic maintenance. In arriving at the minimum
future charter revenues, an estimated off-hire time has been deducted, although such estimate may not be reflective of the actual
off-hire in the future.
17. General and Administrative
Expenses
General and administrative expenses
include management fees payable to our Managers and costs in relation to the administration of our company. General and administrative
expenses for the years ended December 31, 2020, December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2022 were as follows:
| |
December 31, | |
| |
2020 | |
2021 | |
2022 | |
Management fees – related parties | |
$ | 18,884 | |
$ | 19,221 | |
$ | 17,723 | |
Professional fees (legal and accounting) | |
| 832 | |
| 854 | |
| 1,023 | |
Directors fees and expenses | |
| 644 | |
| 759 | |
| 802 | |
Listing fees and expenses | |
| 93 | |
| 101 | |
| 181 | |
Miscellaneous | |
| 1,049 | |
| 1,563 | |
| 2,073 | |
Total | |
$ | 21,502 | |
$ | 22,498 | |
$ | 21,802 | |
18. Unearned Revenue/Accrued
Revenue
Unearned Revenue represents cash
received in advance of it being earned, whereas Accrued Revenue represents revenue earned
prior to cash being received.
Revenue is recognized as earned on a straight-line basis at their average rates when charter agreements provide for varying annual
charter rates over their term. Total Unearned Revenue/Accrued Revenue during the periods presented is as follows:
| |
December 31, |
| |
2021 | |
2022 | |
Unearned Revenue | |
| | |
| | |
Cash received in advance of service provided – Current liability | |
$ | 7,040 | |
$ | 5,290 | |
Deferred revenue resulting from varying charter rates – Current liability | |
| 3,974 | |
| 4,230 | |
Deferred revenue resulting from varying charter rates – Non-Current liability | |
| 7,989 | |
| 7,330 | |
Total Unearned Revenue | |
$ | 19,003 | |
$ | 16,850 | |
Accrued Revenue | |
| | |
| | |
Resulting from varying charter rates – Current asset | |
| 665 | |
| 662 | |
Resulting from varying charter rates – Non-Current asset | |
| 282 | |
| 225 | |
Total Accrued Revenue | |
$ | 947 | |
$ | 887 | |
19. Gain on Sale of Assets
Gain on Sale of
Assets represents net gains from the sale of seven vessels concluded during the year ended December 31, 2021. Summary of the
transactions is presented in the table below:
| |
Years Ended December 31, |
| |
2020 | |
2021 | |
2022 | |
Gain on sale of assets | |
$ | — | |
| 11,579 | |
$ | — | |
Vessel name |
|
Type |
|
Built |
|
Gross sale price |
|
Gain/(loss) |
|
Delivery to new
owners |
Paraskevi |
|
Panamax |
|
2003 |
|
7,300 |
|
|
(551) |
|
April
2021 |
Vassos |
|
Panamax |
|
2004 |
|
8,650 |
|
|
(1,074) |
|
May
2021 |
Pedhoulas Builder |
|
Kamsarmax |
|
2012 |
|
22,500 |
|
|
(1,775) |
|
June
2021 |
Pedhoulas Farmer |
|
Kamsarmax |
|
2012 |
|
22,000 |
|
|
189 |
|
September 2021 |
Maria |
|
Panamax |
|
2003 |
|
12,000 |
|
|
3,843 |
|
September
2021 |
Koulitsa |
|
Panamax |
|
2003 |
|
13,600 |
|
|
5,748 |
|
November
2021 |
Pedhoulas Fighter |
|
Kamsarmax |
|
2012 |
|
23,700 |
|
|
5,199 |
|
November
2021 |
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,579 |
|
|
No vessels were sold during the
years ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2022.
20. Early Redelivery Income,
net
Early redelivery income of $7,470
for the year ended December 31, 2021 mainly relates to the cash compensation of $7,990 less accrued revenue of $435, received by
the Company for the early termination requested by the charterer of the period time charter of the vessel Lake Despina, which was
contractually due to expire in January 2024.
21.
Dividends
During 2022, the Company declared
and paid four quarterly consecutive dividends of $0.05 per common share totaling $24,142.
During 2020, the Company declared
and paid four quarterly consecutive dividends of $0.50 per share of Series C Preferred Shares, totaling $4,596, and four quarterly
consecutive dividends of $0.50 per share of Series D Preferred Shares, totaling $6,393.
During 2021, the Company declared
and paid four quarterly consecutive dividends of $0.50 per share of Series C Preferred Shares, totaling $4,595, and four quarterly
consecutive dividends of $0.50 per share of Series D Preferred Shares, totaling $6,390.
During 2022, the Company declared
and paid four quarterly consecutive dividends of $0.50 per share of Series C Preferred Shares, totaling $2,356, and four quarterly
consecutive dividends of $0.50 per share of Series D Preferred Shares, totaling $6,390.
During 2020, Pinewood declared
and paid preferred dividends totaling JPY54,719,550.00 equivalent to $512 comprising
of a dividend of JPY136,051.34
per share equivalent to $1,243.12 per share of Series A Preferred Shares for the quarter ended March 31, 2020, followed by a dividend
of JPY136,051.34 per share equivalent to $1,272.39 per share of Series A Preferred Shares for the quarter ended June 30, 2020 and
followed by one dividend of JPY137,546.41 per share equivalent to $1,294.87 per share of Series A Preferred Shares for the quarter
ended September 30, 2020. In addition during 2020, Pinewood declared a dividend of JPY137,546.41 per share equivalent to $1,311.62
per share of Series A Preferred Shares for the quarter ended December 31, 2020, then included under the caption “Mezzanine
Equity” in the consolidated balance sheets, which was paid in January 2021.
During February 2021, Pinewood
delivered a notice of redemption for all issued and outstanding Series A Preferred Shares, recorded as mezzanine equity (the “Mezzanine
Equity”). Pinewood declared and paid a final preferred dividend totaling JPY8,395,328.00 equivalent to $79 comprising of
a final dividend of JPY83,953.28 per share equivalent to $791.23 per share of Series A Preferred Shares for the period from January
1, 2021 to February 25, 2021.
22. Earnings Per Share
Diluted earnings per share are
the same as basic earnings per share. There are no other potentially dilutive shares. The computation of basic earnings per share
is presented as follows:
| |
December 31, |
| |
2020 | |
2021 | |
2022 | |
Net (loss)/income | |
$ | (12,905) | |
$ | 174,348 | |
$ | 172,554 | |
Less preferred dividend attributable to preferred shareholders | |
| 11,500 | |
| 11,064 | |
| 8,978 | |
Less/(plus) Mezzanine equity measurement | |
| 908 | |
| (271) | |
| — | |
Net income available to common shareholders | |
$ | (25,313) | |
$ | 163,555 | |
$ | 163,576 | |
Weighted average number of shares, basic and diluted | |
| 102,617,944 | |
| 113,716,354 | |
| 120,653,507 | |
Earnings per share in U.S. Dollars, basic and diluted | |
$ | (0.25) | |
$ | 1.44 | |
$ | 1.36 | |
23. Subsequent
Events
(a) Dividend declaration -
preferred stock Series C and Series D: In January 2023, the board of directors declared a dividend of $0.50 per share of all
classes of preferred shares, totaling $2,000, payable to all shareholders of record as of January 20, 2023, which was paid on January
30, 2023.
(b) Vessel sale: In January
2023, Petra delivered the vessel Pedhoulas Trader to the third-party buyers.
(c) Newbuild delivery: In
January 2023, Gloverthree took delivery of the newbuild Post-panamax class Climate Ethics.
(d) Sale and leaseback financings:
In January 2023, Pentakomo and Maxdekatria exercised their respective purchase options, repaid all outstandings under the sale
and leaseback agreements and took ownership of the vessels Agios Spyridonas and Panayiota K.
(e) Credit facilities: In
January 2023, Pentakomo, Maxdekatria, Gloverthree, and Gloverfive entered into a credit facility with a financial institution for
$67,500. The credit facility will be available upon delivery of the newbuild vessel Gloverfive has agreed to acquire.
(f) Dividend declaration -
common stock: In February 2023, the board of directors declared a dividend of $0.05 per share of common stock, totaling $5,944
payable to all shareholders of record of the Company’s common stock at the closing of trading on March 1, 2023 which will
be paid on March 17, 2023.
(g) Newbuild acquisition:
In February 2023, Shimanine Shipping Corporation (“Shimanine”), a subsidiary of Safe Bulkers incorporated under
the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands in January 2023, entered into a contract for the construction and acquisition
of a newbuild Kamsarmax class vessel scheduled for delivery in 2025.
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT
BLANK
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT
BLANK
|
|
Corporate
directory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board of Directors and Management
Polys Hajioannou
Chief Executive Officer,
Chairman and Director
Dr. Loukas Barmparis
President, Secretary and Director
Konstantinos Adamopoulos
Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Director
Ioannis Foteinos
Chief Operating Officer and Director
Frank Sica
Director
Ole Wikborg
Director
Christos Megalou
Director
Principal Executive office
Safe Bulkers, Inc.
Apt. D11, Les Acanthes
6, Avenue des Citronniers
MC98000, Monaco
Contact Details
Tel: +30 2 111 888-400
+357 25 887-200
E-mail: directors@safebulkers.com
Website
Information about Safe Bulkers’ fleet,
as well as corporate investor information, press releases, stock quotes, and SEC filings may be obtained through our website
at www.safebulkers.com
|
|
Transfer Agent and Registrar
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
6201 15th Avenue, Brooklyn,
NY 11219
Tel: +1 (718) 9218210
Legal Counsel - Capital Markets
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
200 Liberty
Street
New York, NY 10281
Tel: +1 (212) 504 6000
Independent Auditors
Deloitte Certified Public Accountants S.A.
Fragoklissias 3a & Granikou str.,
Marousi 151 25
Athens, Greece
Tel: + 30 (210) 678-1100
Investor Relations/Media Contact
Nicolas Bornozis, President
Capital Link,
Inc.
230 Park Avenue, Suite 1536
New York, N.Y.
10169
Tel.: (212) 661-7566
Fax: (212) 661-7526
E-Mail: safebulkers@capitallink.com
|
|
Stock Listing
Safe Bulkers’ common
stock is traded on the
New York Stock
Exchange under the
ticker symbol “SB”.
|
|
Principal Executive office
Apt. D11, Les Acanthes
6, Avenue des Citronniers
MC98000, Monaco
www.safebulkers.com
|
|
This annual report
is printed on HOLMENBOOK paper 80gr and complies to the following certifications.
SS 627750 AND EN 16001 are the Swedish
and European standards for the introduction of energy management systems.
FSC® – Forest
Stewardship Council® is a system for the certifcation of forestry that is supported by several environmental
organisations.
PEFC – Programme for the Endorsement
of Forest Certifcation schemes is an international system for forest certifcation.
|
|
Exhibit
99.4
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting of
SAFE BULKERS, INC.
To Be Held On:
September 7, 2023 at 16:00 local time
at the Fairmont Hotel, 12 Avenue des Spélugues, Monte Carlo, 98000 Monaco.
|
COMPANY NUMBER |
|
|
ACCOUNT NUMBER |
|
|
CONTROL NUMBER |
|
This communication presents only an overview of the more complete proxy materials that are available to you on the Internet. We
encourage you to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials before voting.
If you want to receive a paper or e-mail copy of the proxy materials you must request one. There is no charge to you for requesting a
copy. To facilitate timely delivery please make the request as instructed below before 08/24/23.
Please visit http://sb.agmdocuments.com/ASM2023.html, where the following materials are available for view:
|
|
• Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
• 2023 Proxy Statement
• Form of Electronic Proxy Card
• 2022 Annual Report
|
TO REQUEST MATERIAL: |
TELEPHONE: 888-Proxy-NA (888-776-9962) 718-921-8562 (for international callers)
E-MAIL: info@astfinancial.com
WEBSITE: https://us.astfinancial.com/OnlineProxyVoting/ProxyVoting/RequestMaterials
|
TO VOTE: |
|
ONLINE: To access your online proxy
card, please visit www.voteproxy.com and follow the on-screen instructions or scan the QR code with your smartphone.
You may enter your voting instructions at www.voteproxy.com up until 11:59 PM Eastern Time the day before the cut-off or meeting
date.
IN PERSON: You may vote your shares in person by attending the Annual Meeting. For directions to the
Annual Meeting please call our Investor Relations representative at Capital Link, Inc. at (212) 661-7566.
TELEPHONE: To vote by telephone, please
visit www.voteproxy.com to view the materials and to obtain the toll free number to call.
MAIL: You may request a card by following the instructions above. |
1. Election of the Class III directors listed below to hold office for a three-year term until the annual meeting for the year in which their terms expire
and until their successors are duly elected and qualified.
NOMINEES:
Konstantinos Adamopoulos
Kristin Holth
Frank Sica
Please note that you cannot use this notice to vote by mail.
|
2. Ratification of appointment of Deloitte, Certified Public Accountants S.A. as the
Company’s independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2023.
Note: To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or
any adjournment or adjournments thereof.
You hereby acknowledge receipt of the Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders, the 2023 Proxy Statement and the 2022 Annual Report to
Shareholders furnished herewith. |
Exhibit
99.5
2023 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF
SAFE BULKERS, INC.
September 7, 2023
PROXY VOTING INSTRUCTIONS |
INTERNET - Access “www.voteproxy.com” and follow the on-screen instructions or scan the QR code with your smartphone.
Have your proxy card available when you access the web page.
TELEPHONE
- Call toll-free 1-800-PROXIES (1-800-776-9437) in the United States or 1-718-921-8500 from
foreign countries from any touch-tone telephone and follow the instructions. Have your proxy card available when you
call.
Vote online/phone until 11:59 PM EST the day before the meeting.
MAIL
- Sign, date and mail your proxy card in the envelope provided as soon as possible.
IN PERSON - You may vote your shares in person by attending the Annual Meeting. For directions to the Annual Meeting please call our Investor
Relations representative at Capital Link, Inc. at (212) 661-7566.
GO GREEN - e-Consent makes it easy to go paperless. With e-Consent, you can quickly access your proxy material, statements and other
eligible documents online, while reducing costs, clutter and paper waste. Enroll today via www.astfinancial.com to enjoy online
access.
COMPANY NUMBER |
|
ACCOUNT NUMBER |
|
|
|
NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIAL:
The Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, 2023 Proxy Statement,
Form of Electronic Proxy Card and 2022 Annual Report
are available at http://sb.agmdocuments.com/ASM2023.html |
| Please
detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope provided IF you are not
voting via telephone or the Internet. | |
|
20330000000000000000 9 |
090723 |
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES AND “FOR” PROPOSAL 2.
PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE x |
1. Election of the Class III directors listed below to hold office for a three-year term until the annual meeting for the year
in which their terms expire and until their successors are duly elected and qualified.
|
|
|
NOMINEES: |
|
o |
FOR ALL NOMINEES |
Konstantinos Adamopoulos
Kristin Holth
Frank Sica
|
|
|
o |
WITHHOLD AUTHORITY
FOR ALL NOMINEES |
|
|
o |
FOR ALL EXCEPT
(See instructions below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INSTRUCTIONS: To
withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “FOR ALL EXCEPT” and fill in the circle
next to each nominee you wish to withhold, as shown here: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address in the address space above.
Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via this method. |
o |
|
FOR |
AGAINST |
ABSTAIN |
2. Ratification of appointment of Deloitte, Certified Public Accountants S.A. as the Company’s independent auditors for the year
ending December 31, 2023. |
o |
o |
o |
|
|
|
|
Note: To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof.
|
|
|
|
|
PLEASE INDICATE WITH AN “X” IN THE APPROPRIATE SPACE HOW YOU WISH YOUR SHARES TO BE VOTED. IF NO INDICATION IS GIVEN, PROXIES
WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF ALL THE NOMINEES TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND FOR PROPOSAL TWO, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
|
Signature of Stockholder |
|
Date: |
|
Signature of Stockholder |
|
Date: |
|
|
Note: |
Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When
signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation,
please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please
sign in partnership name by authorized person. |
|
Safe Bulkers (NYSE:SB-D)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Dez 2024 bis Jan 2025
Safe Bulkers (NYSE:SB-D)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Jan 2024 bis Jan 2025