- Quarterly Report (10-Q)
06 August 2010 - 11:27PM
Edgar (US Regulatory)
Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
ý
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File Number: 00-30747
PACWEST BANCORP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
DELAWARE
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
33-0885320
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
401 West "A" Street
|
|
|
San Diego, California
|
|
92101
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(619) 233-5588
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes
ý
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to
be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
ý
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes
o
No
ý
As of August 3, 2010 there were 35,334,617 shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding, excluding 1,372,870 shares of unvested restricted stock.
Table of Contents
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
Table of Contents
PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Par Value Data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
97,029
|
|
$
|
93,915
|
|
Due from banksinterest bearing
|
|
|
316,357
|
|
|
117,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
413,386
|
|
|
211,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-covered securities available-for-sale (amortized cost of $595,455 at June 30, 2010 and $370,913 at December 31, 2009)
|
|
|
609,656
|
|
|
371,575
|
|
Covered securities available-for-sale (amortized cost of $50,247 at June 30, 2010 and $52,967 at December 31, 2009)
|
|
|
50,771
|
|
|
52,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for sale, at estimated fair value
|
|
|
660,427
|
|
|
423,700
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost
|
|
|
48,555
|
|
|
50,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
|
708,982
|
|
|
474,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-covered loans, net of unearned income
|
|
|
3,185,025
|
|
|
3,707,383
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(88,463
|
)
|
|
(118,717
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-covered loans, net
|
|
|
3,096,562
|
|
|
3,588,666
|
|
Covered loans, net
|
|
|
552,912
|
|
|
621,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
3,649,474
|
|
|
4,210,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-covered other real estate owned, net
|
|
|
24,523
|
|
|
43,255
|
|
Covered other real estate owned, net
|
|
|
27,787
|
|
|
27,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other real estate owned
|
|
|
52,310
|
|
|
70,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
21,677
|
|
|
22,546
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
15,535
|
|
|
18,205
|
|
Core deposit and customer relationship intangibles
|
|
|
28,448
|
|
|
33,296
|
|
Cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
65,382
|
|
|
66,149
|
|
FDIC loss sharing asset
|
|
|
66,068
|
|
|
112,817
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
132,420
|
|
|
104,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
5,153,682
|
|
$
|
5,324,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
|
|
$
|
1,395,510
|
|
$
|
1,302,974
|
|
|
Interest-bearing
|
|
|
2,826,429
|
|
|
2,791,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
4,221,939
|
|
|
4,094,569
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
275,000
|
|
|
542,763
|
|
Subordinated debentures
|
|
|
129,701
|
|
|
129,798
|
|
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
40,457
|
|
|
50,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
4,667,097
|
|
|
4,817,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 5,000,000 shares; none issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 75,000,000 shares at June 30, 2010 and 50,000,000 shares at December 31, 2009; 36,854,817 shares issued
at June 30, 2010 and 35,128,452 shares issued at December 31, 2009 (includes 1,398,173 and 1,095,417 shares of unvested restricted stock, respectively)
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
Capital surplus
|
|
|
1,083,079
|
|
|
1,053,584
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(602,854
|
)
|
|
(545,026
|
)
|
|
Less treasury stock, at cost: 139,076 shares at June 30, 2010 and 113,130 shares at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
(2,550
|
)
|
|
(2,032
|
)
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)unrealized gain (loss) on securities available-for-sale, net
|
|
|
8,541
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders' equity
|
|
|
486,585
|
|
|
506,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
|
$
|
5,153,682
|
|
$
|
5,324,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See "Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements."
3
Table of Contents
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS (LOSS)
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
March 31,
2010
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
62,314
|
|
$
|
63,745
|
|
$
|
61,663
|
|
$
|
126,059
|
|
$
|
123,510
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
5,702
|
|
|
5,121
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
|
10,823
|
|
|
3,187
|
|
|
Deposits in financial institutions
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
68,261
|
|
|
68,995
|
|
|
63,341
|
|
|
137,256
|
|
|
126,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
6,945
|
|
|
6,889
|
|
|
7,367
|
|
|
13,834
|
|
|
16,687
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
2,216
|
|
|
2,668
|
|
|
3,626
|
|
|
4,884
|
|
|
7,208
|
|
|
Subordinated debentures
|
|
|
1,483
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
1,639
|
|
|
2,898
|
|
|
3,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
10,644
|
|
|
10,972
|
|
|
12,632
|
|
|
21,616
|
|
|
27,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
57,617
|
|
|
58,023
|
|
|
50,709
|
|
|
115,640
|
|
|
99,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-covered loans
|
|
|
14,100
|
|
|
112,527
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
126,627
|
|
|
32,000
|
|
|
Covered loans
|
|
|
8,850
|
|
|
20,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for credit losses
|
|
|
22,950
|
|
|
133,227
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
156,177
|
|
|
32,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) after provision for credit losses
|
|
|
34,667
|
|
|
(75,204
|
)
|
|
32,709
|
|
|
(40,537
|
)
|
|
67,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
2,666
|
|
|
2,729
|
|
|
3,009
|
|
|
5,395
|
|
|
6,158
|
|
|
Other commissions and fees
|
|
|
1,845
|
|
|
1,790
|
|
|
1,746
|
|
|
3,635
|
|
|
3,431
|
|
|
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
833
|
|
|
FDIC loss sharing income, net
|
|
|
7,029
|
|
|
16,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
1,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
|
12,082
|
|
|
21,269
|
|
|
5,373
|
|
|
33,351
|
|
|
11,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
21,068
|
|
|
19,411
|
|
|
18,394
|
|
|
40,479
|
|
|
37,725
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
6,576
|
|
|
6,958
|
|
|
6,462
|
|
|
13,534
|
|
|
12,848
|
|
|
Data processing
|
|
|
1,892
|
|
|
1,969
|
|
|
1,677
|
|
|
3,861
|
|
|
3,305
|
|
|
Other professional services
|
|
|
2,042
|
|
|
1,998
|
|
|
1,486
|
|
|
4,040
|
|
|
3,010
|
|
|
Business development
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
1,322
|
|
|
1,350
|
|
|
Communications
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
1,599
|
|
|
1,381
|
|
|
Insurance and assessments
|
|
|
2,611
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
4,885
|
|
|
5,469
|
|
|
Other real estate owned, net
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
10,610
|
|
|
9,231
|
|
|
11,146
|
|
|
10,228
|
|
|
Intangible asset amortization
|
|
|
2,424
|
|
|
2,424
|
|
|
2,367
|
|
|
4,848
|
|
|
4,614
|
|
|
Reorganization and lease charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,215
|
|
|
Other expense
|
|
|
4,174
|
|
|
3,455
|
|
|
3,130
|
|
|
7,629
|
|
|
5,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
|
42,773
|
|
|
50,570
|
|
|
47,931
|
|
|
93,343
|
|
|
86,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
3,976
|
|
|
(104,505
|
)
|
|
(9,849
|
)
|
|
(100,529
|
)
|
|
(7,964
|
)
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(1,271
|
)
|
|
43,972
|
|
|
4,109
|
|
|
42,701
|
|
|
3,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
$
|
2,705
|
|
$
|
(60,533
|
)
|
$
|
(5,740
|
)
|
$
|
(57,828
|
)
|
$
|
(4,295
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
$
|
(1.76
|
)
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
$
|
(1.66
|
)
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
$
|
(1.76
|
)
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
$
|
(1.66
|
)
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
Dividends declared per share
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
See "Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements."
4
Table of Contents
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In Thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
March 31,
2010
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
$
|
2,705
|
|
$
|
(60,533
|
)
|
$
|
(5,740
|
)
|
$
|
(57,828
|
)
|
$
|
(4,295
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of related income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale arising during the period
|
|
|
7,420
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
|
(369
|
)
|
|
8,645
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
10,125
|
|
$
|
(59,308
|
)
|
$
|
(6,109
|
)
|
$
|
(49,183
|
)
|
$
|
(4,042
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
"Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements."
5
Table of Contents
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Share Data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Par
Value
|
|
Capital
Surplus
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
Treasury
Stock
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2010
|
|
|
35,015,322
|
|
$
|
351
|
|
$
|
1,053,584
|
|
$
|
(545,026
|
)
|
$
|
(2,032
|
)
|
$
|
(104
|
)
|
$
|
506,773
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57,828
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57,828
|
)
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
1,348,040
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
26,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,587
|
|
|
Tax effect from vesting of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(772
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(772
|
)
|
|
Restricted stock awarded and earned stock compensation, net of shares forfeited
|
|
|
378,325
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
4,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,421
|
|
|
Restricted stock surrendered
|
|
|
(25,946
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(518
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(518
|
)
|
|
Cash dividends paid ($0.02 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(723
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(723
|
)
|
|
Other comprehensive incomeincrease in net unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale, net of tax effect of $6.3 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,645
|
|
|
8,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2010
|
|
|
36,715,741
|
|
$
|
369
|
|
$
|
1,083,079
|
|
$
|
(602,854
|
)
|
$
|
(2,550
|
)
|
$
|
8,541
|
|
$
|
486,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See "Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements."
6
Table of Contents
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(57,828
|
)
|
$
|
(4,295
|
)
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Accretion) depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
7,327
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
156,177
|
|
|
32,000
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of other real estate owned
|
|
|
(2,081
|
)
|
|
1,505
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned valuation adjustment
|
|
|
11,675
|
|
|
7,532
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of premises and equipment
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock amortization
|
|
|
4,421
|
|
|
4,092
|
|
|
|
|
Tax effect included in stockholders' equity of restricted stock vesting
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in accrued and deferred income taxes, net
|
|
|
(42,753
|
)
|
|
(15,319
|
)
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in FDIC loss sharing asset
|
|
|
46,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in other assets
|
|
|
16,947
|
|
|
8,913
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in accrued interest payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
(10,592
|
)
|
|
(18,731
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
123,208
|
|
|
23,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid to FDIC in settlement of Security Pacific Bank deposit acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
Net decrease in net loans outstanding
|
|
|
163,279
|
|
|
25,948
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of loans
|
|
|
202,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities
|
|
|
82,161
|
|
|
34,620
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
(304,249
|
)
|
|
(77,945
|
)
|
|
|
Net redemptions of FHLB stock
|
|
|
1,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned
|
|
|
44,128
|
|
|
16,359
|
|
|
|
Capitalized costs to complete other real estate owned
|
|
|
(545
|
)
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
|
Purchases of premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
(1,764
|
)
|
|
(1,774
|
)
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
187,186
|
|
|
(3,125
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
|
|
|
92,536
|
|
|
62,406
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing
|
|
|
34,834
|
|
|
(284,310
|
)
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
26,587
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock surrendered
|
|
|
(518
|
)
|
|
(729
|
)
|
|
|
Tax effect included in stockholders' equity of restricted stock vesting
|
|
|
(772
|
)
|
|
(467
|
)
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in borrowings
|
|
|
(260,000
|
)
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
(723
|
)
|
|
(10,483
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(108,056
|
)
|
|
1,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
202,338
|
|
|
21,795
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
211,048
|
|
|
159,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
413,386
|
|
$
|
181,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during period for interest
|
|
$
|
21,884
|
|
$
|
28,621
|
|
|
Cash paid during period for income taxes
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
11,625
|
|
|
Transfers of loans to other real estate owned
|
|
|
32,928
|
|
|
30,343
|
|
See "Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements."
7
Table of Contents
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1BASIS OF PRESENTATION
PacWest Bancorp is a bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. Our principal business is to serve as a holding company for our banking
subsidiary, Pacific Western Bank, which we refer to as Pacific Western or the Bank. When we say "we", "our" or the "Company", we mean the Company on a consolidated basis with the Bank. When we refer
to "PacWest" or to the holding company, we are referring to the parent company on a stand-alone basis.
Pacific
Western is a full-service commercial bank offering a broad range of banking products and services. We accept time and demand deposits, fund loans including real
estate, construction, SBA and commercial loans, and offer other business oriented banking products. Our operations are primarily located in Southern California and the Bank focuses on conducting
business with small to medium sized businesses in our marketplace and the owners and employees of those businesses. Through our asset-based lending function and three banking offices located in the
San Francisco Bay area we also operate in Arizona, Northern California, and the Pacific Northwest.
We
generate our revenue primarily from interest received on loans and, to a lesser extent, from interest received on investment securities, and fees received in connection with deposit
services, extending credit and other services offered, including foreign exchange services. Our major operating expenses are the interest paid by the Bank on deposits and borrowings, compensation and
general operating expenses. The Bank relies on a foundation of locally generated deposits. The Bank has a relatively low cost of funds due to a high percentage of noninterest-bearing and low cost
deposits.
We
have completed 21 acquisitions since May 2000. See Notes 2 and 3 for more information about our acquisitions.
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company are in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which we
refer to as GAAP. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Our
financial statements reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Certain
information and note disclosures normally included in consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The interim operating results are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the full year.
Management of the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period to prepare these
consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates subject to change in the near term include, among other items, the
allowances for credit losses, the carrying value of other real estate owned, the carrying value of intangible assets, the carrying value of the FDIC loss sharing asset and the realization of deferred
tax assets.
8
Table of Contents
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1BASIS OF PRESENTATION (Continued)
As
described in Note 2 below, Pacific Western acquired assets and assumed liabilities of the former Affinity Bank ("Affinity") in an FDIC-assisted transaction, which
we refer to as the Affinity acquisition. The acquired assets and assumed liabilities were measured at estimated fair value. Management made significant estimates and exercised significant judgment in
estimating fair values and accounting for the acquisition of Affinity.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation.
NOTE 2ACQUISITIONS
Business combinations are accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805,
Business Combinations.
Results of operations of an acquired business are included in the statement of earnings from the date of acquisition. Acquisition-related costs, including conversion and restructuring charges, are
expensed as incurred. We adopted this guidance as of January 1, 2009 and applied it to the Affinity acquisition.
For
acquisitions completed prior to January 1, 2009, the estimated merger-related charges associated with each acquisition were recorded as a liability at closing when the related
purchase price was allocated. For each acquisition, we developed an integration plan for the Company that addressed, among other things, requirements for staffing, systems platforms, branch locations
and other facilities. The remaining merger-related liability totals $1.3 million at June 30, 2010 and represents the estimated lease payments, net of estimated sublease income, for the
remaining life of leases for abandoned space.
On August 28, 2009, Pacific Western Bank acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Affinity from the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") in an FDIC-assisted transaction. We entered into a loss sharing agreement with the FDIC, whereby the FDIC will cover a substantial portion of any
future losses on loans, other real estate owned and certain investment securities. We refer to the acquired assets subject to the loss sharing agreement collectively as "covered assets." Under the
terms of such loss sharing agreement, the FDIC will absorb 80% of losses and receive 80% of loss recoveries on the first $234 million of losses on covered assets and absorb 95% of losses and
receive 95% of loss recoveries on covered assets exceeding $234 million. The loss sharing agreement is in effect for 5 years for commercial assets (non-residential loans,
commercial OREO and certain securities) and 10 years for residential assets, both loans and OREO, from the August 28, 2009 acquisition date. The loss recovery provisions are in effect
for 8 years for commercial assets and 10 years for residential assets from the acquisition date. Through June 30, 2010, we have claimed $103.9 million in losses related to
covered assets under the loss sharing agreement and received $83.1 million in cash on such claims. Affinity was a full service commercial bank headquartered in Ventura, California that operated
10 branch locations in California. We made this acquisition to expand our presence in California.
9
Table of Contents
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 2ACQUISITIONS (Continued)
The
assets acquired and liabilities assumed have been accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting (formerly the purchase method). The assets and liabilities, both tangible
and intangible, were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the August 28, 2009 acquisition date.
The following table presents our unaudited pro forma results of operations for the periods presented as if the Affinity acquisition had
been completed on January 1, 2009. The unaudited pro forma results of operations include the historical accounts of the Company and Affinity and pro forma adjustments as may be required,
including the amortization of intangibles with definite lives and the amortization or accretion of any premiums or discounts arising from fair value adjustments for assets acquired and liabilities
assumed. The unaudited pro forma information is intended for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of our future operating results or operating results that would have occurred
had this acquisition been completed at the beginning of 2009. No assumptions have been applied to the pro forma results of operations regarding possible revenue enhancements, expense efficiencies or
asset dispositions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended
|
|
Six Months
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
per share data)
|
|
Revenues (net interest income plus noninterest income)
|
|
$
|
88,719
|
|
$
|
239,766
|
|
Net (loss) earnings
|
|
$
|
(4,978
|
)
|
$
|
36,425
|
|
Net (loss) earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.16
|
)
|
$
|
1.18
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.16
|
)
|
$
|
1.18
|
|
NOTE 3OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Our intangible assets with definite lives are core deposit intangibles, or CDI, and customer relationship intangibles, or CRI. These intangible assets are amortized over their useful
lives to their estimated
residual values and reviewed for impairment at least quarterly. If the recoverable amount of the intangible asset is determined to be less than its carrying value, we would then measure the amount of
impairment based on an estimate of the intangible asset's fair value at that time. If the fair value is below the carrying value, the intangible asset is reduced to such fair value and impairment is
recognized as noninterest expense in the consolidated statement of earnings (loss).
10
Table of Contents
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 3OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Continued)
The
following table presents the changes in CDI and CRI and the related accumulated amortization for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
March 31,
2010
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Gross amount of CDI and CRI:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
75,911
|
|
$
|
75,911
|
|
$
|
72,990
|
|
$
|
75,911
|
|
$
|
72,990
|
|
|
Adjustment to Security Pacific Bank CDI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
75,911
|
|
|
75,911
|
|
|
73,099
|
|
|
75,911
|
|
|
73,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
(45,039
|
)
|
|
(42,615
|
)
|
|
(35,315
|
)
|
|
(42,615
|
)
|
|
(33,068
|
)
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
(2,424
|
)
|
|
(2,424
|
)
|
|
(2,367
|
)
|
|
(4,848
|
)
|
|
(4,614
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
(47,463
|
)
|
|
(45,039
|
)
|
|
(37,682
|
)
|
|
(47,463
|
)
|
|
(37,682
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net CDI and CRI at end of period
|
|
$
|
28,448
|
|
$
|
30,872
|
|
$
|
35,417
|
|
$
|
28,448
|
|
$
|
35,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
aggregate amortization expense related to the intangible assets is expected to be $9.5 million for 2010. The estimated aggregate amortization expense related
to these intangible assets for each of the subsequent four years is $8.0 million for 2011, $5.7 million for 2012, $4.1 million for 2013, and $2.6 million for 2014.
NOTE 4SECURITIES AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE AND FHLB STOCK
Securities Available-for-Sale.
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and estimated fair values of securities
available-for-sale are presented in the table below as of the dates indicated. The private label collateralized mortgage obligations were acquired in the Affinity acquisition
and are covered by the FDIC loss sharing agreement. Other securities include an investment in overnight
11
Table of Contents
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 4SECURITIES AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE AND FHLB STOCK (Continued)
money
market funds at a financial institution. See Note 9 for information on fair value measurements and methodology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Government-sponsored entity debt securities
|
|
$
|
51,297
|
|
$
|
281
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
51,578
|
|
Municipal securities
|
|
|
7,876
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,382
|
|
Residental mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government and government-sponsored entity pass through securities
|
|
|
476,641
|
|
|
13,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
490,052
|
|
|
Government and government-sponsored entity collateralized mortgage obligations
|
|
|
57,343
|
|
|
651
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
57,346
|
|
|
Covered private label collateralized mortgage obligations
|
|
|
50,247
|
|
|
3,658
|
|
|
3,134
|
|
|
50,771
|
|
Other securities
|
|
|
2,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
645,702
|
|
$
|
18,507
|
|
$
|
3,782
|
|
$
|
660,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Government-sponsored entity debt securities
|
|
$
|
38,945
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
$
|
319
|
|
$
|
38,648
|
|
Municipal securities
|
|
|
7,880
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,214
|
|
Residental mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government and government-sponsored entity pass through securities
|
|
|
232,717
|
|
|
3,655
|
|
|
840
|
|
|
235,532
|
|
|
Government and government-sponsored entity collateralized mortgage obligations
|
|
|
89,087
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
2,702
|
|
|
86,897
|
|
|
Covered private label collateralized mortgage obligations
|
|
|
52,967
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
1,555
|
|
|
52,125
|
|
Other securities
|
|
|
2,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
423,880
|
|
$
|
5,236
|
|
$
|
5,416
|
|
$
|
423,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
Table of Contents
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 4SECURITIES AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE AND FHLB STOCK (Continued)
Mortgage-backed
securities have contractual terms to maturity and require periodic payments to reduce principal. In addition, expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities
because obligors and/or issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. The following table presents the contractual maturity distribution of our
available-for-sale securities portfolio based on amortized cost and fair value as of the date indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
2,683
|
|
$
|
2,688
|
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
48,823
|
|
|
49,618
|
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
55,179
|
|
|
56,786
|
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
539,017
|
|
|
551,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
645,702
|
|
$
|
660,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
June 30, 2010, the estimated fair value of debt securities and residential mortgage-backed debt securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and
the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) was approximately $498.3 million. We do not own any equity securities issued by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
As
of June 30, 2010, securities available-for-sale with an estimated fair value of $149.3 million were pledged as collateral for borrowings, public
deposits and other purposes as required by various statutes and agreements.
At
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, none of the securities in our investment portfolio had been in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 months or longer.
The following table presents the fair
value and unrealized losses on securities that were in an unrealized loss position for less than 12 months and considered temporarily impaired as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
Securities In Continuous Loss Position Less Than 12 Months
|
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Government-sponsored entity debt securities
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
35,626
|
|
$
|
319
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government and government-sponsored entity pass through securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,621
|
|
|
840
|
|
|
Government and government-sponsored entity collateralized mortgage obligations
|
|
|
36,971
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
64,661
|
|
|
2,702
|
|
|
Covered private label collateralized mortgage obligations
|
|
|
7,089
|
|
|
3,134
|
|
|
30,511
|
|
|
1,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
44,060
|
|
$
|
3,782
|
|
$
|
244,419
|
|
$
|
5,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We
reviewed these securities that were in a continuous loss position less than 12 months at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and concluded that their losses were
a result of the level of
13
Table of Contents
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 4SECURITIES AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE AND FHLB STOCK (Continued)
market
interest rates and not a result of the underlying issuers' abilities to repay. Accordingly, we determined that the securities were temporarily impaired. Additionally, we have the ability to
hold these securities until their fair values recover to their costs, and therefore did not recognize the temporary impairment in the consolidated statements of earnings (loss).
FHLB Stock.
At June 30, 2010, the Company had a $48.6 million investment in Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
(FHLB) stock
carried at cost. In January 2009, the FHLB announced that it suspended excess FHLB stock redemptions and dividend payments. Since this announcement, the FHLB has declared and paid three cash
dividends, though at rates less than that paid in the past, and repurchased $1.9 million of our excess stock. We evaluated the carrying value of our FHLB stock investment at June 30,
2010 and determined that it was not impaired. Our evaluation considered the long-term nature of the investment, the liquidity position of the FHLB, the actions being taken by the FHLB to
address its regulatory situation, and our intent and ability to hold this investment for a period of time sufficient to recover our recorded investment.
NOTE 5COVERED LOANS, ALLOWANCE FOR LOSS ON COVERED LOANS, AND COVERED OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED
We refer to the loans acquired in the Affinity acquisition as "covered loans" as we will be reimbursed for a substantial portion of any future losses on them under the terms of the FDIC
loss sharing agreement. At the August 28, 2009 acquisition date, we estimated the fair value of the Affinity loan portfolio at $675.6 million, which represented the expected cash flows
from the portfolio discounted at a market-based rate. The carrying values of the covered loans were as follows as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Covered loans, gross
|
|
$
|
673,493
|
|
$
|
742,535
|
|
Less: discount
|
|
|
(82,703
|
)
|
|
(102,849
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covered loans, net of discount
|
|
|
590,790
|
|
|
639,686
|
|
Less: allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(37,878
|
)
|
|
(18,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covered loans, net
|
|
$
|
552,912
|
|
$
|
621,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
covered loans acquired in the Affinity acquisition are subject to our internal and external credit review. If and when deterioration in the expected cash flows occurs, a provision
for credit losses will be charged to earnings for the full amount without regard to the FDIC loss sharing agreement. The portion of the estimated loss reimbursable from the FDIC will be recorded in
FDIC loss sharing income, net and will increase the FDIC loss sharing asset. During the second quarter of 2010 we recorded a provision for credit losses of $8.9 million on the covered loan
portfolio; such provision represents credit deterioration since the acquisition date based on decreases in expected cash flows on certain covered loans measured as of June 30, 2010 compared to
acquisition date expected cash flows. We recorded $7.0 million in FDIC loss sharing income, net during the second quarter of 2010 primarily to reflect the FDIC's share of this estimated loss.
14
Table of Contents
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 5COVERED LOANS, ALLOWANCE FOR LOSS ON COVERED LOANS, AND COVERED OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED (Continued)
At
the acquisition date, the amount by which the undiscounted expected cash flows exceed the estimated fair value of the acquired loans is the "accretable yield". The accretable yield is
then measured at each financial reporting date and represents the difference between the remaining undiscounted expected cash flows and the current carrying value of the loans. The following table
summarizes the changes in the carrying amount of covered loans and accretable yield for the period indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
Amount of
Covered
Loans
|
|
Accretable
Yield
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
621,686
|
|
$
|
(226,446
|
)
|
|
Accretion
|
|
|
23,224
|
|
|
23,224
|
|
|
Payments received
|
|
|
(62,448
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in expected cash flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,307
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
(29,550
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
552,912
|
|
$
|
(186,915
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned ("OREO") covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC ("covered OREO") is recorded at fair value and is
also carried exclusive of the FDIC loss sharing asset. Subsequent decreases in fair value estimates for covered OREO result in a reduction of the covered OREO carrying amounts and an increase in the
FDIC loss sharing asset for
the reimbursable portion. The following table summarizes covered OREO by property type as of the date indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Type
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Improved residential land
|
|
$
|
11,189
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
10,054
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
5,313
|
|
Single family residence
|
|
|
1,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total covered OREO
|
|
$
|
27,787
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Table of Contents
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 5COVERED LOANS, ALLOWANCE FOR LOSS ON COVERED LOANS, AND COVERED OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED (Continued)
The
following table summarizes the activity related to the covered OREO for the period indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covered
OREO
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
27,688
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
12,083
|
|
|
Provision for losses
|
|
|
(2,377
|
)
|
|
Reductions related to sales
|
|
|
(9,607
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
27,787
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 6FDIC LOSS SHARING ASSET
The FDIC loss sharing asset was initially recorded at fair value, which represented the present value of the estimated cash payments from the FDIC for future losses on covered assets.
The ultimate collectability of this asset is dependent upon the performance of the underlying covered assets, the passage of time and claims paid by the FDIC. The following table presents the changes
in the FDIC loss sharing asset for the period indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FDIC
Loss Sharing
Asset
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
112,817
|
|
|
FDIC share of additional losses
|
|
|
25,167
|
|
|
Cash payments received from FDIC
|
|
|
(69,456
|
)
|
|
Net accretion
|
|
|
(2,460
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
66,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Table of Contents
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 7BORROWINGS, SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES AND BROKERED DEPOSITS
The following table summarizes our FHLB advances by their maturity dates outstanding as of the date indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
Maturity Date
|
|
Amount
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
Next Date Callable
by FHLB
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 11, 2013
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
2.71
|
%
|
|
October 11, 2010
|
(1)
|
December 11, 2017
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
3.16
|
%
|
|
September 11, 2010
|
(1)
|
January 11, 2018
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
2.61
|
%
|
|
October 11, 2010
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total FHLB advances
|
|
$
|
275,000
|
|
|
3.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
(1)
-
Callable
quarterly thereafter by FHLB.
The FHLB advances outstanding at June 30, 2010, are callable advances. The maturities shown are the contractual maturities for the
advances. The callable advances have all passed their initial call dates and are currently callable on a quarterly basis by the FHLB. While the FHLB may call the advances to be repaid for any reason,
they are likely to be called if market interest rates, for borrowings of similar
remaining term, are higher than the advances' stated rates on the call dates. We may repay the advances at any time with a prepayment penalty. Our aggregate remaining borrowing capacity under the FHLB
secured lines of credit was $913.6 million at June 30, 2010. Additionally, the Bank had secured borrowing capacity from the Federal Reserve discount window of $386.8 million at
June 30, 2010. The Bank also maintains unsecured lines of credit of $117.0 million with correspondent banks for the purchase of overnight funds; these lines are subject to availability
of funds.
The Company had an aggregate amount of $129.7 million in subordinated debentures outstanding at June 30, 2010. These
subordinated debentures were issued in seven separate series. Each issuance has a maturity of thirty years from its date of issue. The subordinated debentures were issued to trusts established by us
or entities we have acquired, which in turn issued trust preferred securities, which total $123.0 million at June 30, 2010. With the exception of Trust I and Trust CI, the subordinated
debentures are callable at par, only by the issuer, five years from the date of issuance, subject to certain exceptions. We were permitted to call the debentures in the first five years if the
prepayment election relates to one of the following three events: (i) a change in the tax treatment of the debentures stemming from a change in the IRS laws; (ii) a change in the
regulatory treatment of the underlying trust preferred securities as Tier 1 capital; and (iii) a requirement to register the underlying trust as a registered investment company. However,
redemption in the first five years is subject to a prepayment penalty. Trust I and Trust CI may not be called for 10 years from the date of issuance unless one of the three events described
above has occurred and then a prepayment penalty applies. In addition, there is a prepayment penalty if either of these debentures is called 10 to 20 years from the date of their issuance and
they may be called at par after 20 years.
17
Table of Contents
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 7BORROWINGS, SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES AND BROKERED DEPOSITS (Continued)
The
proceeds of the subordinated debentures we originated were used primarily to fund several of our acquisitions and to augment regulatory capital. Interest payments made by the Company
on subordinated debentures are considered dividend payments by the Federal Reserve Bank, or FRB. As such, notification to the FRB is required prior to our intent to pay such interest during any period
in which our cumulative net earnings for previous four quarters are not sufficient to fund the interest payments due for those periods and the current period. Should the FRB object to payment of
interest on the subordinated debentures, we would not be able to make the payments until approval is received or we no longer need to provide notice under applicable regulations.
The
following table summarizes the terms of each issuance of the subordinated debentures outstanding as of June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series
|
|
Date
Issued
|
|
June 30,
2010
Amount
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Earliest
Call Date
by Company
Without
Penalty
|
|
Fixed
or
Variable
Rate
|
|
Rate Index
|
|
Current
Rate
(2)
|
|
Next
Reset
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust CI
|
|
|
3/23/00
|
|
$
|
10,310
|
|
|
3/8/30
|
|
|
3/8/20
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
11.00
|
%
|
|
N/A
|
|
Trust I
|
|
|
9/7/00
|
|
|
8,248
|
|
|
9/7/30
|
|
|
9/7/20
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
10.60
|
%
|
|
N/A
|
|
Trust V
|
|
|
8/15/03
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
9/17/33
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
Variable
|
|
|
3 month LIBOR + 3.10
|
|
|
3.64
|
%
|
|
9/15/10
|
|
Trust VI
|
|
|
9/3/03
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
9/15/33
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
Variable
|
|
|
3 month LIBOR + 3.05
|
|
|
3.59
|
%
|
|
9/11/10
|
|
Trust CII
|
|
|
9/17/03
|
|
|
5,155
|
|
|
9/17/33
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
Variable
|
|
|
3 month LIBOR + 2.95
|
|
|
3.49
|
%
|
|
9/15/10
|
|
Trust VII
|
|
|
2/5/04
|
|
|
61,856
|
|
|
4/23/34
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
Variable
|
|
|
3 month LIBOR + 2.75
|
|
|
3.23
|
%
|
|
10/28/10
|
|
Trust CIII
|
|
|
8/15/05
|
|
|
20,619
|
|
|
9/15/35
|
|
|
9/15/10
|
|
|
Fixed
|
(3)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
5.85
|
%
|
|
9/15/10
|
|
Unamortized premium
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total subordinated debentures
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
129,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
(1)
-
These
debentures may be called without prepayment penalty.
-
(2)
-
As
of July 28, 2010; excludes debt issuance costs.
-
(3)
-
Interest
rate is fixed until 9/15/2010 and then is variable at a rate of 3-month LIBOR + 1.69%.
-
(4)
-
This
amount represents the fair value adjustment on assumed trusts.
As previously mentioned, the subordinated debentures were issued to trusts established by us, or entities we acquired, which in turn issued
$123.0 million of trust preferred securities. These securities are currently included in our Tier I capital for purposes of determining the Company's Tier I and total
risk-based capital ratios. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, which is the holding company's banking regulator, has promulgated a modification of the capital regulations
affecting trust preferred securities that is scheduled to be effective on March 31, 2011. At that time, the Company will be allowed to include in Tier I capital an amount of trust
preferred securities equal to no more than 25% of the sum of all core capital elements, which is generally defined as shareholders' equity less certain intangibles, including goodwill, core deposit
intangibles and customer relationship intangibles, net of any related deferred income tax liability. The regulations currently in effect through December 31, 2010, limit the amount of trust
preferred securities that can be included in Tier I capital to 25% of the sum of core capital elements without a deduction for permitted intangibles. We have determined that our Tier I
capital ratios would remain above the well-capitalized level had the modification of the capital regulations been in effect at June 30, 2010. We expect that our Tier I
capital
18
Table of Contents
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 7BORROWINGS, SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES AND BROKERED DEPOSITS (Continued)
ratios
will be at or above the existing well-capitalized levels on March 31, 2011, the first date on which the modified capital regulations must be applied.
The
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which was signed into law on July 21, 2010, provides that existing trust preferred securities issued
before May 19, 2010 are grandfathered in as Tier 1 capital for all bank holding companies having less than $15 billion in consolidated total assets at December 31, 2009.
Since our consolidated total assets were less than $15 billion at December 31, 2009, our trust preferred securities will continue to be included in Tier 1 capital at the allowable
amounts.
Brokered deposits totaled $162.3 million at June 30, 2010 and are included in the interest-bearing deposits balance on
the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. Such amount includes (a) $57.8 million of customer deposits that were subsequently participated with other
FDIC-insured financial institutions through the CDARS program as a means to provide FDIC deposit insurance coverage for the full amount of our customers' deposits, and
(b) $104.5 million of wholesale CDs. Such amounts exclude $446,000 of money desk CDs acquired in the Affinity acquisition.
NOTE 8COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCES
The Bank is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the
financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk
in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The contract or notional amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of
financial instruments.
Commitments
to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not
necessarily represent future cash requirements. Commitments to extend credit amounting to $673.2 million and $790.6 million were outstanding at June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively.
Standby
letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support
private borrowing arrangements. Most guarantees expire within one year from the date of issuance. The Company generally requires collateral or other security to support financial instruments with
credit risk. Standby letters of credit amounting to $29.2 million and $31.2 million were outstanding at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
19
Table of Contents
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 8COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCES (Continued)
The
Company has investments in low income housing project partnerships which provide the Company income tax credits and in several small business investment companies. As of
June 30, 2010 the Company had commitments to contribute capital to these entities totaling $177,000.
In the ordinary course of our business, we are party to various legal actions, which we believe are incidental to the operation of our
business. The ultimate outcome and amount of liability, if any, with respect to these legal actions to which we are currently a party cannot presently be ascertained with certainty. In the opinion of
management, based upon information currently available to us, any resulting liability is not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
NOTE 9FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
ASC 820,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value including a
three-level valuation hierarchy, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date reflecting assumptions that a market participant would use when pricing an asset or liability. The
hierarchy uses three levels of inputs to measure the fair value of assets and liabilities as follows:
-
-
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
-
-
Level 2: Observable inputs other than Level 1, including quoted prices for similar assets and
liabilities in active markets, quoted prices in less active markets, or other observable inputs that can be corroborated by observable market data, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the
full term of the financial instrument. This category generally includes U.S. government and agency securities.
-
-
Level 3: Inputs to a valuation methodology that are unobservable, supported by little or no market
activity, and significant to the fair value measurement. These valuation methodologies generally include pricing models, discounted cash flow models, or a determination of fair value that requires
significant management judgment or estimation. This category also includes observable inputs from a pricing service not corroborated by observable market data, such as pricing covered private label
CMOs.
We
use fair value to measure certain assets on a recurring basis, primarily securities available-for-sale; we have no liabilities being measured at fair value. For assets and liabilities
measured at the lower of cost or fair value, the fair value measurement criteria may or may not be met during a reporting period and such measurements are therefore considered "nonrecurring" for
purposes of disclosing our fair value measurements. Fair value is used on a nonrecurring basis to adjust carrying values for impaired loans and other real estate owned and also to record impairment on
certain assets, such as goodwill, core deposit intangibles and other long-lived assets.
20
Table of Contents
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 9FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)
The
following tables present information on the assets measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis as of the date indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurement as of June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Measured on a Recurring Basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government-sponsored entity debt securities
|
|
$
|
51,578
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
51,578
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Municipal securities
|
|
|
8,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government and government-sponsored enitity mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
547,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
547,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covered private label CMOs
|
|
|
50,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,771
|
|
|
Other securities
|
|
|
2,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
660,427
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
609,656
|
|
$
|
50,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-covered impaired loans
|
|
$
|
92,580
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
15,724
|
|
$
|
76,856
|
|
|
Covered impaired loans
|
|
|
53,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,880
|
|
|
3,632
|
|
|
Non-covered other real estate owned
|
|
|
15,607
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,520
|
|
|
6,087
|
|
|
Covered other real estate owned
|
|
|
6,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBA loan servicing asset
|
|
|
1,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
169,903
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
81,533
|
|
$
|
88,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There
were no significant transfers of assets between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.
The
following table presents gains and (losses) on assets measured on a nonrecurring basis for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended
June 30, 2010
|
|
Six Months
Ended
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Non-covered impaired loans
|
|
$
|
(13,888
|
)
|
$
|
(19,089
|
)
|
Covered impaired loans
|
|
|
(4,896
|
)
|
|
(21,953
|
)
|
Non-covered other real estate owned
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
|
(6,820
|
)
|
Covered other real estate owned
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(2,053
|
)
|
Servicing asset
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gain (loss) on assets measured on a nonrecurring basis
|
|
$
|
(19,050
|
)
|
$
|
(49,776
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
Table of Contents
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 9FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes activity for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the period indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covered Private Label CMOs
Available-for-Sale
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Beginning as of January 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
52,125
|
|
|
Total realized in earnings
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
Total unrealized in comprehensive income
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
|
Net principal paydowns
|
|
|
(3,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
50,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASC Topic 825,
Financial Instruments
, requires disclosure of the estimated fair value of certain
financial instruments and the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate such fair values. Additionally, certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments are excluded from the
applicable disclosure requirements. The following table is a summary of the carrying values and estimated fair values of certain financial instruments as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Carrying or
Contract
Amount
|
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
|
Carrying or
Contract
Amount
|
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Financial Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
97,029
|
|
$
|
97,029
|
|
$
|
93,915
|
|
$
|
93,915
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits in financial institutions
|
|
|
316,357
|
|
|
316,357
|
|
|
117,133
|
|
|
117,133
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
660,427
|
|
|
660,427
|
|
|
423,700
|
|
|
423,700
|
|
|
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
|
|
|
48,555
|
|
|
48,555
|
|
|
50,429
|
|
|
50,429
|
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
3,649,474
|
|
|
3,642,164
|
|
|
4,210,352
|
|
|
4,195,805
|
|
Financial Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
4,221,939
|
|
|
4,235,926
|
|
|
4,094,569
|
|
|
4,102,467
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
275,000
|
|
|
296,460
|
|
|
542,763
|
|
|
557,363
|
|
|
Subordinated debentures
|
|
|
129,701
|
|
|
132,571
|
|
|
129,798
|
|
|
146,413
|
|
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used to measure our assets recorded at fair value (under ASC Topic 820) and for
estimating fair value for financial instruments not recorded at fair value (under ASC Topic 825).
Cash and due from banks.
The carrying amount is assumed to be the fair value because of the liquidity of these instruments.
Interest-bearing deposits in financial institutions.
The carrying amount is assumed to be the fair value given the short-term
nature of
these deposits.
22
Table of Contents
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 9FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)
Securities available-for-sale.
Securities available-for-sale are measured and carried at fair value
on a recurring basis. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income on the condensed
consolidated balance sheets. Also see Note 4 for further information on unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale.
In
determining the fair value of the securities categorized as Level 2, we obtain a report from a nationally recognized broker-dealer detailing the fair value of each investment
security we hold as of each reporting date. The broker-dealer uses observable market information to value our fixed income securities, with the primary source being a nationally recognized pricing
service. The fair value of the municipal securities is based on a proprietary model maintained by the broker-dealer. We review the market prices provided by the broker-dealer for our securities for
reasonableness based on our understanding of the marketplace and we consider any credit issues related to the bonds. As we have not made any adjustments to the market quotes provided to us and they
are based on observable market data, they have been categorized as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
Our
covered private label collateralized mortgage obligation securities, which were refer to as private label CMOs, are categorized as Level 3 due in part to the inactive market
for such securities. There is a wide range of prices quoted for private label CMOs among independent third party pricing services and this range reflects the significant judgment being exercised over
the assumptions and variables that determine the pricing of such securities. We consider this subjectivity to be a significant unobservable input and have concluded the private label CMOs should be
categorized as a Level 3 measured asset. While the private label CMOs may be based on significant unobservable inputs, our fair value was based on prices provided to us by a nationally
recognized pricing service which we also use to determine the fair value of the majority of our securities portfolio. We determined the reasonableness of the fair values by reviewing assumptions at
the individual security level about prepayment, default expectations, estimated severity loss factors, projected cash flows and estimated collateral performance, all of which are not directly
observable in the market.
FHLB stock.
The fair value of FHLB stock is based on our recorded investment. In January 2009, the FHLB announced that it
suspended excess FHLB stock
redemptions and dividend payments. Since this announcement, the FHLB has declared and paid three cash dividends, though at rates less than that paid in the past, and the FHLB recently redeemed
$1.9 million of our excess stock. As a result of these actions, we evaluated the carrying value of our FHLB stock investment. Based on the FHLB's most recent publicly available financial
results, its capital position and its bond ratings, we concluded such investment was not impaired at either June 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009.
Non-covered loans.
As non-covered loans are not measured at fair value, the following discussion relates to estimating the
fair value disclosures under ASC Topic 825. Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type and further segmented into fixed and
adjustable rate interest terms and by credit risk categories. The fair value estimates do not take into consideration the value of the loan portfolio in the event the loans are sold outside the
parameters of normal operating activities. The fair value of performing fixed rate loans is estimated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity using estimated market
prepayment speeds and estimated market discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loans. The estimated market discount rates used for performing fixed rate loans are
the
23
Table of Contents
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 9FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)
Company's
current offering rates for comparable instruments with similar terms. The fair value of performing adjustable rate loans is estimated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the next
repricing date. As these loans reprice frequently at market rates and the credit risk is not considered to be greater than normal, the market value is typically close to the carrying amount of these
loans.
Non-covered impaired loans.
Non-covered impaired loans are measured and recorded at fair value on a non-recurring
basis. All of our non-covered nonaccrual loans and restructured loans are considered impaired and are reviewed individually for the amount of impairment, if any. Most of our loans are
collateral dependent and, accordingly, we measure impaired loans based on the estimated fair value of such collateral. The fair value of each loan's collateral is generally based on estimated market
prices from an independently prepared appraisal, which is then adjusted for the cost related to liquidating such collateral; such valuation inputs result in a nonrecurring fair value measurement that
is categorized as a Level 2 measurement. When adjustments are made to an appraised value to reflect various factors such as the age of the appraisal or known changes in the market or the
collateral, such valuation inputs are considered unobservable and the fair value measurement is categorized as a Level 3 measurement. The impaired loans categorized as Level 3 also
include unsecured loans and other secured loans whose fair values are based significantly on unobservable inputs such as the strength of a guarantor, including an SBA government guarantee, cash flows
discounted at the effective loan rate, and management's judgment. Of the $108.3 million of nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2010, loans totaling $18.6 million were written down to
their fair values through charge-offs during the quarter. We recorded $1.5 million and $2.2 million in losses on impaired loans for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2010 for loans with a fair value of zero as of June 30, 2010.
Covered loans.
Covered loans were measured at estimated fair value on the date of acquisition. Thereafter, the fair value of
covered loans is
measured using the same methodology as that for non-covered loans. The above discussion for non-covered loans and non-covered impaired loans is applicable to
covered loans following their acquisition date.
Other real estate owned.
The fair value of foreclosed real estate, both non-covered and covered, is generally based on estimated
market
prices from independently prepared current appraisals or negotiated sales prices with potential buyers; such valuation inputs result in a fair value measurement that is categorized as a Level 2
measurement on a nonrecurring basis. As a matter of policy, appraisals are required annually and may be updated more frequently as circumstances require in the opinion of management. With the
deterioration of real estate values during this economic downturn, appraisals have been obtained more regularly and as a result our Level 2 measurement is based on appraisals that are generally
less than nine months old. When a current appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value as a result of
known changes in the market or the collateral and there is no observable market price, such valuation inputs result in a fair value measurement that is categorized as a Level 3 measurement. To
the extent a negotiated sales price or reduced listing price represents a significant discount to an observable market price, such valuation input would result in a fair value measurement that is also
considered a Level 3 measurement. The OREO losses shown above are write-downs based on either a recent appraisal obtained after foreclosure or an accepted purchase offer by an independent third
party received after foreclosure.
24
Table of Contents
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 9FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)
SBA servicing asset.
In accordance with ASC Topic 860,
Accounting for Servicing of Financial
Assets
,
the SBA servicing asset, included in other assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, is carried at its implied fair value of $1.8 million. The fair value of the servicing asset is
estimated by discounting future cash flows using market-based discount rates and prepayment speeds. The discount rate is based on the current US Treasury yield curve, as published by the Department of
the Treasury, plus a spread for the marketplace risk associated with these assets. We utilize estimated prepayment vectors using SBA prepayment information provided by Bloomberg for pools of similar
assets to determine the timing of the cash flows. These nonrecurring valuation inputs are considered to be Level 3 inputs.
Deposits.
Deposits are carried at historical cost. The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as noninterest
bearing demand deposits,
savings and checking accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand as of the balance sheet date. The fair value of time deposits is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The
discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. No value has been separately assigned to the Company's long-term relationships
with its deposit customers, such as a core deposit intangible.
Borrowings.
Borrowings are carried at amortized cost. The fair value of adjustable rate borrowings is estimated to be the
carrying amount because
rates paid are the same as rates currently offered for borrowings with similar remaining maturities and characteristics. The fair value of fixed rate borrowings is calculated by discounting scheduled
cash flows through the estimated maturity or call dates using estimated market discount rates that reflect current rates offered for borrowings with similar remaining maturities and characteristics.
Subordinated debentures.
Subordinated debentures are carried at amortized cost. In accordance with ASC Topic 825, the fair value
of the subordinated
debentures is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows for fixed rate securities. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for similar securities of similar
maturity. The fair value of subordinated debentures with variable rates is deemed to be the carrying value.
Commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit.
The majority of our commitments to extend credit carry current market
interest rates if
converted to loans. Because these commitments are generally unassignable by either the borrower or us, they only have value to the borrower and us. The estimated fair value approximates the recorded
deferred fee amounts and is excluded from the table above because it is not material.
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time and are based on relevant market information and information about the
financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect income taxes or any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company's entire holdings of a particular
financial instrument. Because no market exists for a portion of the Company's financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on what management believes to be conservative judgments regarding
expected future cash flows, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimated fair values are subjective in nature and involve
uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot
25
Table of Contents
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 9FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)
be
determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates. Since the fair values have been estimated as of June 30, 2010, the amounts that will actually be
realized or paid at settlement or maturity of the instruments could be significantly different.
NOTE 10NET EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
The following is a summary of the calculation of basic and diluted net earnings (loss) per share for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
March 31,
2010
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands except per share data)
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
$
|
2,705
|
|
$
|
(60,533
|
)
|
$
|
(5,740
|
)
|
$
|
(57,828
|
)
|
$
|
(4,295
|
)
|
|
Less: earnings allocated to unvested restricted stock
(1)
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
(233
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) allocated to common shares
|
|
$
|
2,606
|
|
$
|
(60,541
|
)
|
$
|
(5,747
|
)
|
$
|
(57,845
|
)
|
$
|
(4,528
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total weighted-average basic shares and unvested restricted stock outstanding
|
|
|
36,732.9
|
|
|
35,607.8
|
|
|
32,313.3
|
|
|
36,173.4
|
|
|
32,049.4
|
|
|
Less: weighted-average unvested resticted stock outstanding
|
|
|
(1,420.6
|
)
|
|
(1,245.7
|
)
|
|
(1,245.7
|
)
|
|
(1,333.6
|
)
|
|
(1,266.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total weighted-average basic shares outstanding
|
|
|
35,312.3
|
|
|
34,362.1
|
|
|
31,067.6
|
|
|
34,839.8
|
|
|
30,783.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
$
|
(1.76
|
)
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
$
|
(1.66
|
)
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) allocated to common shares
|
|
$
|
2,606
|
|
$
|
(60,541
|
)
|
$
|
(5,747
|
)
|
$
|
(57,845
|
)
|
$
|
(4,528
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total weighted-average basic shares and unvested restricted stock outstanding
|
|
|
36,732.9
|
|
|
35,607.8
|
|
|
32,313.3
|
|
|
36,173.4
|
|
|
32,049.4
|
|
|
Add: warrants outstanding
|
|
|
86.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: weighted-average unvested resticted stock outstanding
|
|
|
(1,420.6
|
)
|
|
(1,245.7
|
)
|
|
(1,245.7
|
)
|
|
(1,333.6
|
)
|
|
(1,266.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total weighted-average diluted shares outstanding
|
|
|
35,399.1
|
|
|
34,362.1
|
|
|
31,067.6
|
|
|
34,839.8
|
|
|
30,783.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
$
|
(1.76
|
)
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
$
|
(1.66
|
)
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
(1)
-
Represents
cash dividends paid to holders of unvested restricted stock, net of estimated forfeitures, plus undistributed earnings amounts
available to holders of unvested restricted stock, if any.
26
Table of Contents
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 11STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS
At June 30, 2010, there were outstanding 898,173 shares of unvested time-based restricted common stock and 500,000
shares of unvested performance-based restricted common stock. The awarded shares of time-based restricted common stock vest over a service period of three to five years from date of the
grant. The awarded shares of performance-based restricted common stock vest in full on the date the Compensation, Nominating and Governance, or CNG, Committee of the Board of Directors, as
Administrator of the Company's 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, or the 2003 Plan, determines that the Company achieved certain financial goals established by the CNG Committee as set forth in the grant
documents. Both time-based and performance-based restricted common stock vest immediately upon a change in control of the Company as defined in the 2003 Plan and upon death of the
employee.
Compensation
expense related to awards of restricted stock is based on the fair value of the underlying stock on the award date and is recognized over the vesting period using the
straight-line method. The vesting of performance-based restricted stock awards and recognition of related compensation expense may occur over a shorter vesting period if financial
performance targets are achieved earlier than anticipated. In 2007, the amortization of certain performance-based restricted stock awards was suspended. In 2008 we concluded it was improbable that the
financial targets would be met for the performance-based stock awards and we reversed the accumulated amortization on
those awards. If and when the attainment of such performance targets is deemed probable in future periods, a catch-up adjustment will be recorded and amortization of such performance-based
restricted stock will begin again. The total amount of unrecognized compensation expense related to the performance-based restricted stock for which amortization was suspended totaled
$27.7 million at June 30, 2010. The unvested performance-based restricted stock awarded in 2006 expires in 2013. The unvested performance-based restricted stock awarded in 2007 and 2008
expires in 2017. Restricted stock amortization totaled $2.2 million, $2.3 million and $1.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, March 31, 2010 and
June 30, 2009, respectively, and $4.4 million and $4.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Such amounts are included in compensation
expense on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of earnings (loss).
The
Company's 2003 Plan permits stock based compensation awards to officers, directors, key employees and consultants. The 2003 Plan authorizes grants of stock-based compensation
instruments to purchase or issue up to 5,000,000 shares of authorized but unissued Company common stock, subject to adjustments provided by the 2003 Plan. As of August 4, 2010, there were
1,201,835 shares available for grant under the 2003 Plan.
NOTE 12RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
FASB ASC 810 Consolidation
("ASC 810") became effective for us on January 1, 2010, and was amended to change how a company
determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The determination of whether a company is required to
consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entity's purpose and design and a company's ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity's
economic performance. The new authoritative accounting guidance requires additional disclosures about the reporting entity's involvement with variable-interest entities and any significant changes in
risk exposure due to that involvement as well as its affect on the entity's financial
27
Table of Contents
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 12RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (Continued)
statements.
The new authoritative accounting guidance under ASC 810 was effective January 1, 2010 and did not have an impact on our financial statements.
FASB ASC 860 Transfers and Servicing
("ASC 860") was amended to enhance reporting about transfers of financial assets, including
securitizations, and where companies have continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. The new authoritative accounting guidance eliminates the concept of a "qualifying
special-purpose entity" and changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets. The new authoritative accounting guidance also requires additional disclosures about all continuing
involvements with transferred financial assets including information about gains and losses resulting from transfers during the period. The new authoritative accounting guidance under ASC 860 was
effective January 1, 2010 and did not have an impact on our financial statements.
In
January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2010-06, "
Improving Disclosures about
Fair Value Measurements
". ASU 2010-06 requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements including transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 and a
higher level of disaggregation for the different types of financial instruments. For the reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements, information about purchases, sales, issuances and
settlements are presented separately. This standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 with the exception of revised Level 3
disclosure requirements which are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. Comparative disclosures are not required in the year of adoption. We
adopted the provisions of the standard on January 1, 2010, which did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
In
April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-18, "
Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan is Part of a Pool That is Accounted for as a Single
Asset
". ASU 2010-18 requires that a modified loan in a pool of purchased credit-impaired loans remain in the pool even if the modification would otherwise be
considered a troubled debt restructuring. An entity will continue to be required to consider whether the pool of assets in which the loan is included is impaired if expected cash flows for the pool
change. A one-time election to terminate accounting for loans in a pool, which may be made on a pool-by-pool basis, is provided upon adoption of ASU
2010-18. This ASU is effective for modifications of loans accounted for within pools under ASC Subtopic 310-30, "
Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with
Deteriorated Credit Quality,
" occurring in the first interim and annual reporting period ending on or after July 15, 2010. ASU 2010-18 is to be applied
prospectively, but early application is permitted. This standard is not expected to have an impact on our financial statements.
In
July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, "
Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit
Losses
." ASU 2010-20 requires additional information about credit risk exposure for financing receivables and the related allowance for loan losses including an
allowance rollforward on a portfolio segment basis, the recorded investment in financing receivables on a portfolio segment basis, the nonaccrual status of financing receivables by class, impaired
financing receivables by class, aging of past due receivables by class, credit quality indicators by class, troubled debt restructurings information by class, and significant purchases and sales of
financing receivables. ASU 2010-20 defines portfolio segment as the level at which an entity develops and documents a systematic method for determining its allowance for loan losses. Classes of
financing receivables generally are a disaggregation of portfolio segments. The required disclosures will be effective for us on December 31, 2010, and will be included in our 2010 Annual
Report on Form 10-K. Adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.
28
Table of Contents
PACWEST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 13COMMON STOCK
On March 1, 2010 holders of 1,348,040 warrants to acquire PacWest Bancorp common stock exercised such warrants for net proceeds of $26.6 million. The warrants, which had a
strike price of $20.20 per share, represented 99% of the 1,361,656 six-month warrants issued in August 2009. An additional 1,361,657 million warrants issued in August 2009 with a
strike price of $20.20 remain outstanding, of which 1,348,040 expire on August 27, 2010 and 13,617 expire on August 30, 2010.
On
December 22, 2009, PacWest Bancorp filed a registration statement with the SEC to offer to sell, from time to time, shares of common stock, preferred stock, and other equity
linked securities for an aggregate initial offering price of up to $350.0 million. The registration statement was declared effective on January 8, 2010. Proceeds from the offering are
anticipated to be used to fund future acquisitions of banks and financial institutions and for general corporate purposes.
NOTE 14SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On July 1, 2010, we purchased a $234.1 million performing Southern California real estate loan portfolio serviced by the Bank for a cash price of $228.3 million. The
loans have a weighted-average coupon interest rate of 6.15% and a weighted average maturity of 4.6 years.
We
have evaluated events that have occurred subsequent to June 30, 2010 and have concluded there are no subsequent events that would require recognition in the accompanying
condensed consolidated financial statements.
29
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Information
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking information about the Company and its
subsidiaries, which statements are intended to be covered by the safe harbor for "forward-looking statements" provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other
than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. Such statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict and are generally beyond the control
of the Company. We caution readers that a number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in,
implied or projected by, such forward- looking statements. Risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:
-
-
lower than expected revenues;
-
-
credit quality deterioration or pronounced and sustained reduction in real estate market values could cause an increase in
the allowance for credit losses and a reduction in earnings;
-
-
increased competitive pressure among depository institutions;
-
-
the Company's ability to complete future acquisitions and to successfully integrate such acquired entities or achieve
expected benefits, synergies and/or operating efficiencies within expected time-frames or at all;
-
-
the possibility that personnel changes will not proceed as planned;
-
-
the cost of additional capital is more than expected;
-
-
a change in the interest rate environment reduces interest margins;
-
-
asset/liability repricing risks and liquidity risks;
-
-
pending legal matters may take longer or cost more to resolve or may be resolved adversely to the Company;
-
-
general economic conditions, either nationally or in the market areas in which the Company does or anticipates doing
business, are less favorable than expected;
-
-
environmental conditions, including natural disasters, may disrupt our business, impede our operations, negatively impact
the values of collateral securing the Company's loans or impair the ability of our borrowers to support their debt obligations;
-
-
the economic and regulatory effects of the continuing war on terrorism and other events of war, including the conflicts in
Iraq, Afghanistan, and neighboring countries;
-
-
legislative or regulatory requirements or changes adversely affecting the Company's business;
-
-
changes in the securities markets; and
-
-
regulatory approvals for any capital activities cannot be obtained on the terms expected or on the anticipated schedule.
If
any of these risks or uncertainties materializes, or if any of the assumptions underlying such forward-looking statements proves to be incorrect, our results could differ materially
from those expressed in, implied or projected by, such forward-looking statements. The Company assumes no obligation to update such forward-looking statements.
30
Table of Contents
Overview
We are a bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. Our principal business is to serve as
the holding company for our subsidiary bank, Pacific Western Bank, which we refer to as Pacific Western or the Bank.
Pacific
Western is a full-service community bank offering a broad range of banking products and services including: accepting time and demand deposits; originating loans,
including commercial, real estate construction, SBA-guaranteed, consumer, and international loans; and providing other business-oriented products. Our operations are primarily located in
Southern California and the Bank focuses on conducting business with small to medium-sized businesses and the owners and employees of those businesses in our marketplace. Through our asset-based
lending operation we also operate in Arizona, Northern California, the Pacific Northwest, and Texas. At June 30, 2010, our assets totaled $5.2 billion, of which loans totaled
$3.6 billion, including $552.9 million of covered loans. At that date, the loan portfolio was broken down as follows: approximately 72% were real estate mortgage loans, 20% were
commercial loans, 7% were real estate construction loans, and less than 1% were consumer and other loans. These percentages include some foreign loans, primarily to individuals or entities with
business in Mexico, representing 1% of total non-covered loans. Our portfolio's value and credit quality is affected in large part by real estate trends in Southern California, which have
been negative over the last several quarters.
Pacific
Western competes actively for deposits, and emphasizes solicitation of noninterest-bearing deposits. In managing the top line of our business, we focus on quality loan growth and
loan yield, deposit cost, and net interest margin, as net interest income, on a year-to-date basis, accounts for 78% of our net revenues (net interest income plus noninterest
income).
July 1, 2010 Loan Portfolio Purchase
On July 1, 2010, we purchased a $234.1 million portfolio of 225 performing loans secured by Southern California real
estate for a cash price of $228.3 million. Such loans have a weighted-average coupon interest rate of 6.15% and a weighted-average maturity of 4.6 years. These
loans were part of the Foothill Independent Bank loan portfolio that we acquired when we completed the Foothill Independent Bancorp acquisition in May 2006. In March 2007, we sold a 95% participating
interest in these loans for cash and continued to service them and maintain the borrower relationships. When the opportunity to purchase this loan portfolio presented itself several months ago, we
concluded it would be in the best interests of the Company and the Bank to make this purchase as (a) we are familiar with the credit risk, and (b) it would deploy excess liquidity and
enhance interest income and the net interest margin. We estimated that had we purchased this loan portfolio at the beginning of the second quarter of 2010, our net interest margin would have been
5.20%, or 35 basis points higher than the second quarter's actual net interest margin of 4.85%. See Balance Sheet Analysis
Noncovered Loans
for the detail of this loan purchase by type of loan.
Recent Legislation
On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the
"Dodd-Frank Act"). The Dodd-Frank Act contains numerous provisions that will affect all banks and bank holding companies, and will fundamentally change the system of oversight
described in Part I, Item 1 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 under the caption "BusinessSupervision
and Regulation." The Dodd-Frank Act includes provisions that, among other things, will:
-
-
Centralize responsibility for consumer financial protection by creating a new agency responsible for implementing,
examining and, for large financial institutions, enforcing compliance with
31
Table of Contents
Some
of these provisions may have the consequence of increasing our expenses, decreasing our revenues, and changing the activities in which we choose to engage. The environment in which
banking organizations will now operate, including legislative and regulatory changes affecting capital, liquidity, supervision, permissible activities, corporate governance and compensation, changes
in fiscal policy and steps to eliminate government support for banking organizations, may have long-term effects on the business model and profitability of banking organizations that
cannot now be foreseen.
The specific impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on our current activities or new financial activities we may consider in the future, our financial performance and the markets in which we operate
will depend on the manner in which the relevant agencies develop and implement the required regulations and the reaction of market participants to these regulatory developments. Many aspects of the
Dodd-Frank Act are subject to rulemaking and will take effect over several years, making it difficult to anticipate the overall financial impact on us, our customers or the financial
industry more generally.
Key Performance Indicators
Among other factors, our operating results depend generally on the following:
Net interest income is the excess of interest earned on our interest-earning assets over the interest paid on our interest-bearing
liabilities. The low market interest rate environment throughout 2009 and continuing in 2010 has reduced our net interest margin relative to our historical performance. A sustained low interest rate
environment combined with tight marketplace liquidity and low loan growth may lower both our net interest income and net interest margin going forward.
Our
primary interest-earning asset is loans. Our primary interest-bearing liabilities include deposits, borrowings, and subordinated debentures. We attribute our high net interest margin
to our loan-to-deposit ratio and a high level of noninterest-bearing deposits. While our deposit balances will
32
Table of Contents
fluctuate
depending on deposit holders' perceptions of alternative yields available in the market, we attempt to minimize these variances by attracting a high percentage of noninterest-bearing
deposits, which have no expectation of yield. At June 30, 2010, approximately 33% of our total deposits were noninterest-bearing.
The
disruptions in the financial credit and liquidity markets have resulted in increased competition from financial institutions seeking to maintain liquidity. In addition to deposits,
we have borrowing
capacity under various credit lines which we use for liquidity needs such as funding loan demand, managing deposit flows and interim acquisition financing. This borrowing capacity is relatively
flexible and has become one of the least expensive sources of funds. However, our borrowing lines are considered a secondary source of liquidity as we serve our local markets and customers with our
deposit products.
We generally seek new lending opportunities in the $500,000 to $10 million range, try to limit loan maturities for commercial
loans to one year, for construction loans up to 18 months, and for commercial real estate loans up to ten years, and to price lending products so as to preserve our interest spread and net
interest margin. We sometimes encounter strong competition in pursuing lending opportunities such that potential borrowers obtain loans elsewhere at lower rates than those we offer. We have continued
to reduce our exposure to residential construction and foreign loans, including limiting the amount of new loans in these categories. Our ability to make new loans is dependent on economic factors in
our market area, borrower qualifications, competition, and liquidity, among other items. Considering the current state of the economy in Southern California and the competition among banks for
liquidity, loan growth has not been a focus area for us thus far in 2010.
We stress credit quality in originating and monitoring the loans we make and measure our success by the levels of our nonperforming
assets, net charge-offs and allowance for credit losses. Our allowance for credit losses is the sum of our allowance for loan losses and our reserve for unfunded loan commitments and
relates only to our non-covered loans. Provisions for credit losses are charged to operations as and when needed for both on and off balance sheet credit exposure. Loans which are deemed
uncollectible are charged off and deducted from the allowance for loan losses. Recoveries on loans previously charged off are added to the allowance for loan losses. During the three months ended
June 30, 2010, we made a provision for credit losses totaling $23.0 million composed of $14.1 million on non-covered loans and $8.9 million on covered loans.
Such provision was based on our allowance methodology, the level of classified and non-accrual loans, usage trends of unfunded loan commitments, general market conditions, and portfolio
risk concentrations, among other factors. The provision for credit losses on the covered loan portfolio reflects an increase in the covered loan allowance for credit losses resulting from lower
expected cash flows on certain loans since the Affinity acquisition date.
We
regularly review our loans to determine whether there has been any deterioration in credit quality stemming from economic conditions or other factors which may affect collectability
of our loans. Changes in economic conditions, such as inflation, unemployment, increases in the general level of interest rates, declines in real estate values and negative conditions in borrowers'
businesses, could
negatively impact our customers and cause us to adversely classify loans and increase portfolio loss factors. An increase in classified loans generally results in increased provisions for credit
losses. Any deterioration in the real estate market may lead to increased provisions for credit losses because of our concentration in real estate loans.
33
Table of Contents
Our noninterest expense includes fixed and controllable overhead, the major components of which are compensation, occupancy, insurance
and assessments, data processing, professional fees and communications expense. We measure success in controlling such costs through monitoring of the efficiency ratio. We calculate the efficiency
ratio by dividing noninterest expense by net revenues (the sum of net interest income plus noninterest income). Accordingly, a lower percentage reflects lower operating expenses relative to net
revenue. The consolidated operating efficiency ratios have been as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended:
|
|
Efficiency
Ratio
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
61.4
|
%
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
63.8
|
%
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
53.7
|
%
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
37.1
|
%
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
85.5
|
%
|
The
decrease in the efficiency ratio for the second quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of 2010 was due mostly to lower OREO expenses. The gain from the Affinity acquisition
reduced the third quarter of 2009 efficiency ratio by 4,840 basis points from 85.5% to 37.1%. Lower levels of interest income over the last several quarters have been a factor in causing our
efficiency ratio to increase. Interest income levels have been negatively affected by slow loan growth and low market interest rates.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Company's accounting policies are fundamental to understanding management's discussion and analysis of results of operations and
financial condition. The Company has identified several policies as being critical because they require management to make particularly difficult, subjective and/or complex judgments about matters
that are inherently uncertain and because of the likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. These policies relate to the
allowances for credit losses and the carrying values of intangible assets and deferred income tax assets. For further information, refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009.
Results of Operations
Certain discussion in this Form 10-Q contains non-GAAP financial disclosures for tangible common equity.
The Company uses certain non-GAAP financial measures to provide meaningful supplemental information regarding the Company's operational performance and to enhance investors' overall
understanding of such financial performance. Tangible common equity is a non-GAAP financial measure used by investors, analysts, and bank regulatory agencies. Tangible common equity
includes total equity, less any preferred equity, goodwill and intangible assets. The methodology of determining tangible common equity may differ among companies. Management reviews tangible common
equity along with other measures of capital adequacy on a regular basis and has included this non-GAAP financial information, and the corresponding reconciliation to total equity, because
of current interest in such information on the part of market participants.
These
non-GAAP financial measures are presented for supplemental informational purposes only for understanding the Company's operating results and should not be considered a
substitute for financial information presented in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting
34
Table of Contents
principles
(GAAP). The following table presents performance ratios in accordance with GAAP and a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measurements to the GAAP financial measurements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non GAAP Measurements
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
March 31,
2010
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
PacWest Bancorp Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' equity
|
|
$
|
486,585
|
|
$
|
474,844
|
|
$
|
464,097
|
|
Less: Intangible assets
|
|
|
28,448
|
|
|
30,872
|
|
|
35,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity
|
|
$
|
458,137
|
|
$
|
443,972
|
|
$
|
428,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
5,153,682
|
|
$
|
5,203,217
|
|
$
|
4,476,236
|
|
Less: Intangible assets
|
|
|
28,448
|
|
|
30,872
|
|
|
35,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible assets
|
|
$
|
5,125,234
|
|
$
|
5,172,345
|
|
$
|
4,440,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity to assets ratio
|
|
|
9.44
|
%
|
|
9.13
|
%
|
|
10.37
|
%
|
Tangible common equity ratio
(1)
|
|
|
8.94
|
%
|
|
8.58
|
%
|
|
9.65
|
%
|
Pacific Western Bank
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholder's equity
|
|
$
|
573,227
|
|
$
|
559,909
|
|
$
|
510,086
|
|
Less: Intangible assets
|
|
|
28,448
|
|
|
30,872
|
|
|
35,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity
|
|
$
|
544,779
|
|
$
|
529,037
|
|
$
|
474,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
5,141,150
|
|
$
|
5,192,003
|
|
$
|
4,468,870
|
|
Less: Intangible assets
|
|
|
28,448
|
|
|
30,872
|
|
|
35,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible assets
|
|
$
|
5,112,702
|
|
$
|
5,161,131
|
|
$
|
4,433,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-to-assets
|
|
|
11.15
|
%
|
|
10.78
|
%
|
|
11.41
|
%
|
Tangible common equity ratio
(1)
|
|
|
10.66
|
%
|
|
10.25
|
%
|
|
10.71
|
%
|
-
(1)
-
Calculated
as tangible common equity divided by tangible assets.
35
Table of Contents
Summarized financial information for the periods indicated are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
March 31,
2010
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
57,617
|
|
$
|
58,023
|
|
$
|
50,709
|
|
$
|
115,640
|
|
$
|
99,482
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
12,082
|
|
|
21,269
|
|
|
5,373
|
|
|
33,351
|
|
|
11,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
69,699
|
|
|
79,292
|
|
|
56,082
|
|
|
148,991
|
|
|
110,936
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
(22,950
|
)
|
|
(133,227
|
)
|
|
(18,000
|
)
|
|
(156,177
|
)
|
|
(32,000
|
)
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
(42,773
|
)
|
|
(50,570
|
)
|
|
(47,931
|
)
|
|
(93,343
|
)
|
|
(86,900
|
)
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(1,271
|
)
|
|
43,972
|
|
|
4,109
|
|
|
42,701
|
|
|
3,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
$
|
2,705
|
|
$
|
(60,533
|
)
|
$
|
(5,740
|
)
|
$
|
(57,828
|
)
|
$
|
(4,295
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
4,768,527
|
|
$
|
4,799,472
|
|
$
|
4,135,372
|
|
$
|
4,783,915
|
|
$
|
4,165,611
|
|
Profitability measures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
$
|
(1.76
|
)
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
$
|
(1.66
|
)
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
$
|
(1.76
|
)
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
$
|
(1.66
|
)
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
4.85
|
%
|
|
4.90
|
%
|
|
4.92
|
%
|
|
4.87
|
%
|
|
4.82
|
%
|
|
Return (loss) on average assets
|
|
|
0.21
|
%
|
|
(4.70
|
)%
|
|
(0.52
|
)%
|
|
(2.24
|
)%
|
|
(0.19
|
)%
|
|
Return (loss) on average equity
|
|
|
2.26
|
%
|
|
(48.54
|
)%
|
|
(4.88
|
)%
|
|
(23.66
|
)%
|
|
(1.86
|
)%
|
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
61.4
|
%
|
|
63.8
|
%
|
|
85.5
|
%
|
|
62.7
|
%
|
|
78.3
|
%
|
Net earnings for the second quarter of 2010 were $2.7 million, or $0.07 per diluted share, compared to a net loss of
$60.5 million, or $1.76 per diluted share, for the first quarter of 2010. The first quarter included a higher provision for credit losses caused by the Company's previously reported sale of
$323.6 million of classified loans in February 2010 for $200.6 million in cash.
Net earnings for the second quarter of 2010 were $2.7 million, or $0.07 per diluted share, compared to a net loss of
$5.7 million, or $0.18 per diluted share, for the second quarter of 2009. The increase in net earnings is due mainly to higher net interest income, FDIC loss sharing income, and a reduction in
OREO costs.
The net loss of $57.8 million, or $1.66 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to a net loss
of $4.3 million, or $0.15 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase in net loss for the current year-to-date period is attributed to
a higher provision for credit losses related to the classified loan sale and higher noninterest expense, while net interest income and FDIC loss sharing income increased.
Net Interest Income.
Net interest income, which is our principal source of revenue, represents the difference between interest
earned on assets and
interest paid on liabilities. Net interest margin is net interest income expressed as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. Net interest income is affected by changes in both interest rates
and the volume of average interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the distribution of
36
Table of Contents
average
assets, liabilities and stockholders' equity, as well as interest income and yields earned on average interest-earning assets and interest expense and rates on average interest-bearing
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
Interest
Income/
Expense
|
|
Yields
and
Rates
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
Interest
Income/
Expense
|
|
Yields
and
Rates
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
Interest
Income/
Expense
|
|
Yields
and
Rates
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income
(1)(2)
|
|
$
|
3,809,546
|
|
$
|
62,314
|
|
|
6.56
|
%
|
$
|
4,122,853
|
|
$
|
63,745
|
|
|
6.27
|
%
|
$
|
3,921,561
|
|
$
|
61,663
|
|
|
6.31
|
%
|
Investment securities
(2)
|
|
|
584,368
|
|
|
5,702
|
|
|
3.91
|
%
|
|
469,732
|
|
|
5,121
|
|
|
4.42
|
%
|
|
179,976
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
|
3.66
|
%
|
Deposits in financial institutions
|
|
|
374,613
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
0.26
|
%
|
|
206,887
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
0.25
|
%
|
|
33,835
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
0.44
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
4,768,527
|
|
$
|
68,261
|
|
|
5.74
|
%
|
|
4,799,472
|
|
$
|
68,995
|
|
|
5.83
|
%
|
|
4,135,372
|
|
$
|
63,341
|
|
|
6.14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
413,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
418,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
5,181,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,217,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,414,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest checking deposits
|
|
$
|
438,945
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
0.31
|
%
|
$
|
434,446
|
|
$
|
393
|
|
|
0.37
|
%
|
$
|
370,664
|
|
$
|
393
|
|
|
0.43
|
%
|
Money market deposits
|
|
|
1,203,527
|
|
|
2,773
|
|
|
0.92
|
%
|
|
1,166,688
|
|
|
2,868
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
|
891,610
|
|
|
2,712
|
|
|
1.22
|
%
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
112,909
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
0.21
|
%
|
|
110,564
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
0.21
|
%
|
|
114,339
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
0.15
|
%
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
1,068,033
|
|
|
3,776
|
|
|
1.42
|
%
|
|
1,045,417
|
|
|
3,570
|
|
|
1.38
|
%
|
|
692,439
|
|
|
4,219
|
|
|
2.44
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
2,823,414
|
|
|
6,945
|
|
|
0.99
|
%
|
|
2,757,115
|
|
|
6,889
|
|
|
1.01
|
%
|
|
2,069,052
|
|
|
7,367
|
|
|
1.43
|
%
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
303,877
|
|
|
2,216
|
|
|
2.92
|
%
|
|
445,754
|
|
|
2,668
|
|
|
2.43
|
%
|
|
475,634
|
|
|
3,626
|
|
|
3.06
|
%
|
Subordinated debentures
|
|
|
129,732
|
|
|
1,483
|
|
|
4.59
|
%
|
|
129,780
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
4.42
|
%
|
|
129,924
|
|
|
1,639
|
|
|
5.06
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
3,257,023
|
|
$
|
10,644
|
|
|
1.31
|
%
|
|
3,332,649
|
|
$
|
10,972
|
|
|
1.34
|
%
|
|
2,674,610
|
|
$
|
12,632
|
|
|
1.89
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
1,403,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,332,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,223,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
41,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
4,701,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,712,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,943,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' equity
|
|
|
480,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
505,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
471,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
|
$
|
5,181,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,217,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,414,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
57,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
58,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
50,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest rate spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.43
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.49
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.85
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.90
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.92
|
%
|
-
(1)
-
Includes
nonaccrual loans and loan fees.
-
(2)
-
Yields
on loans and securities have not been adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis because the impact is not material.
Net interest income declined $406,000 to $57.6 million during the second quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of 2010
due primarily to a $734,000 drop in interest income offset partially by a $328,000 reduction in interest expense. The decrease in interest income was due mainly to a decline in interest on loans
resulting mostly from a lower average loan balance during the second quarter attributable to the $323.6 million classified loan sale in February 2010. The reduction in interest expense was due
primarily to a decrease in interest on borrowings, resulting mostly from a
lower average borrowing balance during the second quarter attributable to the repayment of $125 million in FHLB advances in April 2010.
37
Table of Contents
Our net interest margin for the second quarter of 2010 was 4.85%, a decrease of 5 basis points from the 4.90% posted for the first quarter of 2010. Such decline
reflects lower average loans during the second quarter as a result of the February 2010 classified loan sale and the related shift in the composition of average interest-earning assets from higher
yielding loans to lower yielding investment securities and deposits in financial institutions. The yield on average loans was 6.56% for the second quarter of 2010 compared to 6.27% for the prior
quarter. The loan yield, interest-earning asset yield and net interest margin are all affected by loans being placed on nonaccrual and the acceleration of purchase discounts on covered loan
pay-offs. The net interest margin for the second quarter was positively impacted by 11 basis points from the combination of discount acceleration on covered loan pay-offs and
nonaccrual loan accrued interest reversals. The decline in yield on investment securities is due to lower market interest rates on second quarter of 2010 investment security purchases. The cost of
interest-bearing deposits and all-in deposits each decreased 2 basis points during the second quarter of 2010 to 0.99% and 0.66%, respectively; such decreases resulted from a combination
of lower rates on money market and interest checking accounts and an increase in time deposit volume and related interest cost as customers elected products with a longer maturity.
Yields,
costs and net interest margin for the month ended June 30, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month Ended
June 30, 2010
|
|
Loan yield
|
|
|
6.28
|
%
(1)
|
Interest-earning asset yield
|
|
|
5.47
|
%
(1)
|
Interest-bearing deposit cost
|
|
|
0.94
|
%
|
Interest-bearing liability cost
|
|
|
1.27
|
%
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
4.62
|
%
(1)(2)
|
All-in deposit cost
|
|
|
0.63
|
%
(3)
|
-
(1)
-
Excludes
the effect of nonaccrual loan interest income reversals.
-
(2)
-
We
estimated that if we had made the July 1, 2010 loan purchase at the beginning of June, our pro forma June net interest margin would
have been 4.97%, or 35 basis points higher than the actual June net interest margin of 4.62%.
-
(3)
-
Noninterest-bearing
deposit balances are used to calculate this cost.
Net interest income grew $6.9 million during the second quarter of 2010 compared to the same quarter of 2009. The increase in
interest income was due primarily to higher yields on the loans and investment securities portfolios, as well as a higher average balance for investment securities. The decline in interest expense was
due primarily to a reduction in average borrowings as well as a decrease in the average rate on deposits.
While
our net interest rate spread increased for the second quarter of 2010 when compared to the same period of 2009, our net interest margin for the second quarter of 2010 decreased
seven basis points when compared to the second quarter of 2009. This decrease is due primarily to the lower overall yield on average interest-earning assets resulting from the industry-wide shift in
the composition
38
Table of Contents
of
average interest-earning assets from higher yielding loans to lower yielding investment securities and deposits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
Interest
Income/
Expense
|
|
Yields
and
Rates
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
Interest
Income/
Expense
|
|
Yields
and
Rates
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income
(1)(2)
|
|
$
|
3,965,334
|
|
$
|
126,059
|
|
|
6.41
|
%
|
$
|
3,929,895
|
|
$
|
123,510
|
|
|
6.34
|
%
|
Investment securities
(2)
|
|
|
527,367
|
|
|
10,823
|
|
|
4.14
|
%
|
|
172,695
|
|
|
3,187
|
|
|
3.72
|
%
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Deposits in financial institutions
|
|
|
291,214
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
0.26
|
%
|
|
62,892
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
0.31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
4,783,915
|
|
$
|
137,256
|
|
|
5.79
|
%
|
|
4,165,611
|
|
$
|
126,795
|
|
|
6.14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
415,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
281,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
5,199,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,447,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest checking deposits
|
|
$
|
436,708
|
|
$
|
731
|
|
|
0.34
|
%
|
$
|
360,343
|
|
$
|
847
|
|
|
0.47
|
%
|
Money market deposits
|
|
|
1,185,210
|
|
|
5,642
|
|
|
0.96
|
%
|
|
866,649
|
|
|
5,324
|
|
|
1.24
|
%
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
111,743
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
0.21
|
%
|
|
118,648
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
0.25
|
%
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
1,056,786
|
|
|
7,345
|
|
|
1.40
|
%
|
|
795,480
|
|
|
10,366
|
|
|
2.63
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
2,790,447
|
|
|
13,834
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
|
2,141,120
|
|
|
16,687
|
|
|
1.57
|
%
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
374,424
|
|
|
4,884
|
|
|
2.63
|
%
|
|
463,687
|
|
|
7,208
|
|
|
3.13
|
%
|
Subordinated debentures
|
|
|
129,756
|
|
|
2,898
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
129,950
|
|
|
3,418
|
|
|
5.30
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
3,294,627
|
|
$
|
21,616
|
|
|
1.32
|
%
|
|
2,734,757
|
|
$
|
27,313
|
|
|
2.01
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
1,368,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,193,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
43,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
4,706,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,981,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' equity
|
|
|
492,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
465,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
|
$
|
5,199,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,447,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
115,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
99,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest rate spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.47
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.13
|
%
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.87
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.82
|
%
|
-
(1)
-
Includes
nonaccrual loans and loan fees.
-
(2)
-
Yields
on loans and securities have not been adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis because the impact is not material.
Net interest income increased $16.2 million to $115.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to
the same period of 2009. The growth in interest income was due to higher yields and average balances on the loan and investment securities portfolios related to the Affinity acquisition. The decline
in interest expense was due primarily to a decrease in both deposits and borrowings costs.
39
Table of Contents
The
net interest margin for the first six months of 2010 was 4.87% compared to 4.82% for the first six months of 2009. The increase is due mostly to lower funding costs offset somewhat
by an increase in lower yielding assets as the Company increased its on-balance sheet liquidity.
Provision for Credit Losses.
The amount of the provision for credit losses in a reporting period is a charge against earnings in
that reporting
period. We have a provision for credit losses on our non-covered loans and a provision for credit losses on our covered loans. The provisions for credit losses on our non-covered loans are based on
our allowance methodology and are costs that, in our judgment, are required to maintain the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and the reserve for unfunded loan commitments. The provision for
credit losses on our covered loans reflects an increase in the covered loan allowance for credit losses resulting from credit deterioration since the Affinity acquisition date.
We
made provisions for credit losses totaling $23.0 million during the second quarter of 2010 compared to $133.2 million for the first quarter of 2010 and
$18.0 million for the second quarter of 2009. The second quarter 2010 provision for credit losses was composed of a $14.3 million addition to the allowance for loan losses on the
non-covered loan portfolio, an $8.9 million addition to the covered loan allowance for credit losses and a $245,000 reduction to the reserve for unfunded loan commitments. The first
quarter of 2010 provision for credit losses was composed of a $112.9 million addition to the allowance for loan losses on the non-covered loan portfolio, a $20.7 million addition to the covered loan
allowance for credit losses and a $345,000 reduction to the reserve for unfunded loan commitments. The second quarter 2009 provision for credit losses was composed of an $18.7 million addition
to the allowance for loan losses and a $650,000 reduction to the reserve for unfunded loan commitments.
Net
non-covered loan charge-offs in the second quarter of 2010 decreased by $133.4 million to $12.0 million when compared to the first quarter of
2010. The first quarter's net charge-offs on non-covered loans included $123 million related to the classified loan sale completed during the quarter and
$22 million in other non-covered loan charge-offs. These charge-off levels reflect the aggressive actions we are taking to promptly identify and resolve
problem credits. The commercial real estate loan segment of the loan portfolio continues to be under stress from the current economic conditions. A protracted economic down cycle will increase the
stress on this portion of the loan portfolio and we may continue to experience increased levels of charge-offs and provisions.
During
the second quarter of 2010, we recorded an $8.9 million provision for credit losses on the covered loan portfolio that was based on a June 30, 2010 analysis of
acquired loans, which indicated a decrease in expected cash flows from previous estimates. Under the terms of the FDIC loss sharing agreement, the FDIC absorbs 80% of the losses reflected by the
provision. As a result, we recorded $7.0 million in FDIC loss sharing income on the condensed consolidated statements of earnings (loss) during the second quarter of 2010.
40
Table of Contents
Net
credit costs, which include OREO expense, net, are shown in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
March 31,
2010
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Provision for credit losses on non-covered loans
|
|
$
|
14,100
|
|
$
|
112,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses on covered loans
|
|
$
|
8,850
|
|
$
|
20,700
|
|
Less: Increase in FDIC loss sharing asset
|
|
|
7,080
|
|
|
16,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net credit costs on covered loans
|
|
$
|
1,770
|
|
$
|
4,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-covered OREO expense
|
|
$
|
625
|
|
$
|
8,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covered OREO (income) expense
|
|
$
|
(89
|
)
|
$
|
2,168
|
|
Less: OREO-related increase in FDIC loss sharing asset
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
1,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net covered OREO (income) expense
|
|
$
|
(37
|
)
|
$
|
450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit-related costs, net
|
|
$
|
16,458
|
|
$
|
125,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increased
provisions for credit losses may be required in the future based on loan and unfunded commitment growth, the effect changes in economic conditions, such as inflation,
unemployment, market interest rate levels, and real estate values may have on the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans, and other negative conditions specific to our borrowers' businesses.
See further discussion in Balance Sheet Analysis
Allowance for Credit Losses on Non-Covered Loans
and
Allowance for Credit Losses on Covered Loans
contained herein.
Noninterest Income.
The following table summarizes noninterest income by category for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
March 31,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
September 30,
2009
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts
|
|
$
|
2,666
|
|
$
|
2,729
|
|
$
|
2,890
|
|
$
|
2,960
|
|
$
|
3,009
|
|
Other commissions and fees
|
|
|
1,845
|
|
|
1,790
|
|
|
1,799
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
|
1,746
|
|
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
394
|
|
FDIC loss sharing income, net
|
|
|
7,029
|
|
|
16,172
|
|
|
16,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain from Affinity acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,989
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
$
|
12,082
|
|
$
|
21,269
|
|
$
|
21,828
|
|
$
|
72,625
|
|
$
|
5,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income for the second quarter of 2010 totaled $12.1 million compared to $21.3 million for the first quarter
of 2010 and $5.4 million for the second quarter 2009. The increases in noninterest income for the first two quarters of 2010 when compared to the second quarter of 2009 is due primarily to FDIC
loss sharing income. FDIC loss sharing income represents the FDIC's share of credit losses and recoveries on covered loans and covered OREO occurring subsequent to the August 2009 Affinity acquisition
date.
41
Table of Contents
Noninterest income increased $21.9 million, to $33.4 million, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 from
$11.5 million for the same period in 2009. The increase was due mainly to $23.2 million of FDIC loss sharing income.
Noninterest Expense.
The following table summarizes noninterest expense by category for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
March 31,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
September 30,
2009
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Compensation
|
|
$
|
21,068
|
|
$
|
19,411
|
|
$
|
20,320
|
|
$
|
20,128
|
|
$
|
18,394
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
6,576
|
|
|
6,958
|
|
|
7,100
|
|
|
6,435
|
|
|
6,462
|
|
Data processing
|
|
|
1,892
|
|
|
1,969
|
|
|
1,831
|
|
|
1,810
|
|
|
1,677
|
|
Other professional services
|
|
|
2,042
|
|
|
1,998
|
|
|
2,047
|
|
|
1,857
|
|
|
1,486
|
|
Business development
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
625
|
|
Communications
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
688
|
|
Insurance and assessments
|
|
|
2,611
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
|
1,826
|
|
|
2,010
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
Other real estate owned, net
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
10,610
|
|
|
4,953
|
|
|
8,141
|
|
|
9,231
|
|
Intangible asset amortization
|
|
|
2,424
|
|
|
2,424
|
|
|
2,355
|
|
|
2,578
|
|
|
2,367
|
|
Other expense
|
|
|
4,174
|
|
|
3,455
|
|
|
3,329
|
|
|
2,842
|
|
|
3,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
$
|
42,773
|
|
$
|
50,570
|
|
$
|
45,213
|
|
$
|
47,091
|
|
$
|
47,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
61.4
|
%
|
|
63.8
|
%
|
|
53.7
|
%
|
|
37.1
|
%
|
|
85.5
|
%
|
Noninterest expense totaled $42.8 million for the second quarter of 2010 compared to $50.6 million for the first quarter
of 2010. The $7.8 million decrease was due mostly to lower OREO costs. Compensation costs increased from the resumption of incentive accruals and deposit insurance costs increased from higher
assessments associated with the increase in our deposit balances and our participation in the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program.
The
following table presents OREO costs, net for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
March 31,
2010
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Provision for losses
|
|
$
|
1,218
|
|
$
|
10,457
|
|
$
|
7,238
|
|
Maintenance costs
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
526
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale
|
|
|
(1,034
|
)
|
|
(1,047
|
)
|
|
1,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total OREO costs, net
|
|
$
|
536
|
|
$
|
10,610
|
|
$
|
9,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest
expense includes amortization of time-based and performance-based restricted stock, which is included in compensation, and intangible asset amortization.
Amortization of restricted stock totaled $2.2 million for the second quarter of 2010 compared to $2.3 million for the first quarter of 2010. Amortization expense for restricted stock is
estimated to be $8.5 million for 2010. Intangible asset amortization totaled $2.4 million for both the second and first quarters of 2010 and is estimated to be $9.5 million for
2010. The 2010 estimates of both restricted stock award expense and intangible asset amortization are subject to change.
42
Table of Contents
Noninterest expense decreased $5.2 million for second quarter of 2010 when compared to the same period of 2009. The decrease in
noninterest expense is due to lower OREO and insurance costs mitigated by higher compensation costs. OREO costs decreased due to reduced write-downs during the second quarter of 2010 when compared to
the same period of 2009. Insurance costs were lower in 2010 due to the special deposit assessment that the FDIC charged to all depository institutions in the second quarter of 2009, which totaled $2.0
million for our Bank; no such assessment occurred this year. Compensation costs increased due to the additional staff from the Affinity acquisition and increased incentive accruals.
Noninterest expense grew $6.4 million to $93.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010 from
$86.9 million for the same period in 2009. Other professional services costs increased $1.0 million due mainly to higher legal costs related to loan workouts. OREO costs increased
$918,000 due to the volume of activity and continued deterioration in market values. Other expense increased $1.9 million due mostly to higher loan-related costs of $760,000 and a
$726,000 fee for early repayment of $125 million of FHLB advances; there was no FHLB prepayment fee in the first half of 2009. The increases in other expense categories were due mostly to
higher overhead costs related to the August 2009 Affinity acquisition. Partially offsetting these factors were decreases in reorganization and lease charges and insurance and assessments. The 2009
reorganization charges totaling $1.2 million related to a staff reduction and additional rent for a discontinued acquired office; there were no similar charges in 2010. Insurance and
assessments decreased $584,000 due to the special assessment included in the second quarter of 2009 with no similar assessment in 2010 offset by higher deposit insurance premiums in the current year
from rate increases and higher average deposit balances.
Income Taxes.
The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2010 was 32.0% compared to 42.1% for the first quarter of 2010.
The lower rate in the
second quarter results mostly from resolution of a tax contingency which reduced income tax expense by $400,000. The Company's blended Federal and California statutory rate is 42.0%.
Balance Sheet Analysis
Non-Covered Loans.
Gross non-covered loans totaled $3.2 billion at June 30, 2010 and was comprised primarily of
$2.2 billion in real estate mortgage loans, $734.4 million in commercial loans, and $194.2 million in real estate construction loans. Our loan portfolio's value and credit quality is
affected in large part by real estate trends in Southern California which have been negative for the last several quarters. The real estate mortgage loan category includes loans secured by commercial
real estate totaling $2.0 billion and loans secured by residential real estate totaling $277.6 million. The real estate construction category includes commercial real estate construction
loans totaling $115.5 million and residential real estate construction loans totaling $78.7 million, of which $77.0 million is nonowner-occupied. See also Balance Sheet
Analysis
Loan Portfolio Risk Elements
for further information on this $77.0 million nonowner-occupied residential real estate
construction loan exposure.
At
June 30, 2010, the non-covered SBA loan portfolio totaled $128.5 million and was composed of $94.3 million in SBA 504 loans and $34.2 million
in SBA 7(a) and Express loans. SBA 7(a) loans are secured by borrowers' real estate and/or business assets and are covered by an SBA guarantee of up to 85% of the loan amount. The SBA 504 loans are
included in the real estate mortgage category and the SBA 7(a) and Express loans are included in the commercial category.
43
Table of Contents
The
following table presents the balance of each major category of non-covered loans at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
Loan Category:
|
|
Amount
|
|
% of Total
|
|
Amount
|
|
% of Total
|
|
Amount
|
|
% of Total
|
|
Amount
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Domestic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate, mortgage
|
|
$
|
2,229,331
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
$
|
2,197,295
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
$
|
2,423,712
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
$
|
2,511,292
|
|
|
64
|
%
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
709,075
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
720,105
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
781,003
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
776,060
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
Real estate, construction
|
|
|
194,181
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
284,274
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
440,286
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
544,889
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
30,323
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
28,804
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
32,138
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
35,150
|
|
|
1
|
|
Foreign:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
25,309
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
26,736
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
34,524
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
42,672
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Other, including real estate
|
|
|
1,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross non-covered loans
|
|
|
3,189,856
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
3,258,889
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
3,713,382
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
3,911,785
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: unearned income
|
|
|
(4,831
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(5,055
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(5,999
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(7,419
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Less: allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(88,463
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(86,163
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(118,717
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(72,122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net non-covered loans
|
|
$
|
3,096,562
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,167,671
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,588,666
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,832,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross non-covered loans decreased $69.0 million during the second quarter of 2010 due mostly to continued weakened economic
conditions which have caused higher levels of charge-offs, lower demand for new loans and fewer acceptable lending opportunities.
As
mentioned under "July 1, 2010 Loan Portfolio Purchase" above, we purchased a $234.1 million portfolio of 225 performing loans secured by Southern California real estate
for a cash price of $228.3 million. Such loans have a weighted-average coupon interest rate of 6.15% and a weighted-average maturity of 4.6 years. These loans were part of the Foothill
Independent Bank loan portfolio that we acquired when we completed the Foothill Independent Bancorp acquisition in May 2006. In March 2007, we sold a 95% participating interest in these loans for cash
and continued to service them and maintain the borrower relationships. A summary by type of the loans purchased follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, 2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Office building and light industrial
|
|
$
|
151,958
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
47,968
|
|
Commercial owner-occupied
|
|
|
16,757
|
|
Other commercial
|
|
|
12,476
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
2,685
|
|
Hotel
|
|
|
1,797
|
|
Commercial land
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans purchased
|
|
$
|
234,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
Table of Contents