Netlist’s U.S. Patent Nos. 8,301,833, 9,854,035, 10,268,608, and 10,489,314. As of the reporting date, the PTAB granted Micron’s request for the ‘035 Patent, but denied its request for the ‘608 Patent. Netlist’s Patent Owner Preliminary Response to Micron’s requests to IPR the ‘314 patent were filed August 3, 2022, and the PTAB’s deadline to make a decision on institution for the ‘833 Patent is September 9, 2022.
On March 31, 2022, Netlist filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Micron in Germany, seeking damages based on their infringement of EP735 and EP660. On June 24, 2022, Netlist filed an extension of its Complaint requesting injunctive relief. The Dusseldorf Court set an oral hearing for the case in Dusseldorf on May 4, 2023.
On June 10, 2022, Netlist filed a complaint for patent infringement against Micron in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division (Case No. 2:22-cv-00203-JRG-RSP). These proceedings are based on the alleged infringement by Micron’s load reduced dual in line memory modules (“LRDIMM”), Micron’s memory modules utilizing on-board power management modules (“PMIC”), and Micron’s high bandwidth memory (“HBM”) components, under six U.S. patents – U.S. Patent Nos. 8,787,060; 9,318,160; 10,860,506; 10,949,339; 11,016,918; & 11,232,054. As of the reporting date, the case has been assigned to Hon. Chief Judge Rodney Gilstrap.
On August 1, 2022, Netlist filed a complaint for patent infringement against Micron in the United States Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:22-cv-00294) under the ‘912 Patent, which relates generally to technologies to implement rank multiplication.
Samsung Litigations
On May 28, 2020, Netlist filed a complaint against Samsung in the United States District Court for the Central District of California for Samsung’s breach of the parties’ JDLA. On July 22, 2020, Netlist amended its complaint to seek a Declaratory Judgment that it properly terminated the JDLA in light of Samsung’s material breaches. On October 14, 2021, the Court entered summary judgment in Netlist’s favor and confirmed Netlist properly terminated the JDLA as of July 15, 2020. On February 15, 2022, the Court entered a Final Judgment in favor of Netlist on each of its three claims and confirmed conclusively that all licenses granted under the JDLA were terminated. On February 25, 2022, Samsung filed a Notice of Appeal, and the Federal Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a Time Schedule Order on February 28, 2022, setting Samsung’s deadline to file an opening appeal brief as June 6, 2022. As of the reporting date, Samsung filed its opening brief seeking an appeal of the lower Court’s decisions. Netlist filed its response to Samsung’s appeal and its own opening cross-appeal brief on August 4, 2022.
On October 15, 2021, Samsung filed a declaratory judgement action against Netlist in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (“DDE”), requesting in relevant part that the Delaware District Court declare that Samsung does not infringe Netlist’s U.S. Patent Nos. 7,619,912, 9,858,218, 10,217,523, 10,474,595, 10,860,506, 10,949,339, and 11,016,918. As of the reporting date, Samsung seeks leave to add U.S. Patent No. 11,232,054 (issued Jan. 25, 2022) to the action. Netlist believes Samsung’s claims levied in the DDE action meritless, and the relief Samsung requests unjustified. Netlist filed a motion seeking dismissal of Samsung’s operative DDE complaint, and an opposition contesting the inclusion of U.S. Patent No. 11,232,054 as part of Samsung’s proposed second amended complaint filing. On August 1, 2022, the Court entered an Order on the pending motions denying Samsung’s request to amend its operative complaint a second time to add a count against U.S. Patent No. 11,232,054, and granting-in-part Netlist’s motion that various causes of action be dismissed. Specifically, Judge Andrews dismissed all of Samsung’s counts related to Netlist’s U.S. Patent Nos. 7,619,912, 10,860,506, 10,949,339, and 11,016,918. As of the reporting date, the Court has not yet set a case schedule.
On November 19, 2021, Samsung filed IPR requests contesting the validity of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,858,218 (the “’218 patent”), 10,474,595 (the “’595 patent”), and 10,217,523 (the “’523 patent”). Netlist filed its initial responses to Samsung’s petitions on February 18, 2022, contesting the institution of any IPR on the grounds propounded. As of the reporting date, the PTAB has granted Samsung’s IPR requests related to the ‘218, ‘523, and ‘595 patents. Netlist filed its Patent Owner’s Response for the ‘523 IPR on August 4, 2022, and has a deadline to file its Patent Owner Responses for the ‘218 and’595 IPRs on August 15, 2022.