This announcement contains inside
information
15 April 2024
88 Energy
Limited
HICKORY-1 FLOW TEST - SECOND
LIGHT OIL DISCOVERY
Highlights
· Dual
reservoir success at Hickory-1 with second light oil discovery at the SMD-B
reservoir.
· Peak flow
rate of ~50 barrels of oil per day (bopd) of light oil (measuring approx.
39-degree API oil gravity, under nitrogen lift).
· The SMD-B
reservoir showed little to no measurable associated gas flow (low
Gas-oil-Ratio (GoR), which
validates the pre-test analysis.
· Hickory-1
has now delivered two successful oil flows and three independent
discoveries:
- SMD-B (today's result): with a peak
flow rate of ~50 bopd of light oil (measuring approx. 39-degree API
oil gravity, under nitrogen lift).
- Upper SFS (USFS) (previously announced on 2 April
2024): with a peak flow rate of over 70 bopd of light oil
(measuring approx. 40-degree API oil gravity, under natural
flow).
- Both flow rates result from
low volume stimulations over small 20ft perforated intervals in
vertical well.
- Previously announced
Basin Floor Fan (BFF) Gross
Best Estimate (2C)
Contingent Resource of 250 Million Barrels of Oil Equivalent
(MMBOE) (refer 88E ASX
release dated 6 November 2023)
· Quality
and deliverability of both SMD-B and USFS demonstrated via oil
production to surface with the USFS reservoir producing
under natural flow -
positively differentiating Hickory-1 from results on adjacent
acreage.
· It is
anticipated that these reservoirs will be developed from long
horizontal production wells which typically produce at multiples of
between 6 to 12 times higher than vertical wells. Project Phoenix
also benefits from the ability to produce concurrently from
multiple reservoirs in a single development scenario.
· Well
testing results from the current field season confirm long-held views of the producibility of
multiple reservoirs at Project Pheonix.
· As such,
the Hickory-1 flow test results can be rightly characterised as
in-line with those observed from equivalent reservoirs on adjacent
acreage. Importantly, the performance of the USFS reservoir
exceeded expectations, with the well flowing naturally with
increasing oil cut.
· The
results from the Hickory-1 flow tests permits an independent
Contingent Resource assessment for both the SFS and SMD reservoirs;
expected to be complete during 2H 2024.
· Project
Phoenix JV to conduct post-test studies for integration into
existing models allowing refined development planning for all
reservoirs; studies to commence 2H 2024.
·
Commercialisation options to be advanced in parallel,
including farm-out to a strategic development partner and/or early,
capital-lite production, given proximate infrastructure advantages
(Hickory-1 next to Dalton Highway and Trans-Alaskan Pipeline System
(TAPS)).
88 Energy Limited (ASX:88E, AIM:88E, OTC:EEENF)
(88 Energy or the
Company) is pleased to
announce further successful flow test results from the Company's
Hickory-1 discovery well, located in Project Phoenix on the North
Slope of Alaska (88 Energy ~75% WI owner).
Managing Director, Ashley Gilbert,
commented:
"Having now successfully demonstrated light oil flow from two
reservoirs at Hickory-1 in recent weeks, it is clear that this is a
significant milestone in the history of 88 Energy. The USFS success
represents the first time that we have successfully flowed oil to
surface in Alaska - and under natural flow - as well as being the
first time we have confirmed a light oil discovery of substantial
scale in close proximity to the critical Dalton Highway and
Trans-Alaskan Pipeline System infrastructure. To then achieve a
second successful flow of light oil from the SMD-B reservoir, with
a low gas/oil ratio, is an outstanding outcome for 88 Energy and
its shareholders.
The flowing of light oil from multiple reservoirs demonstrates
the potential that this acreage holds for our shareholders,
positioning the Company to grow and extract value from Project
Phoenix via multiple potential development and commercialisation
pathways. These include farm-out to a strategic partner in pursuit
of a carry towards a development proposition and/or accelerated,
capital-lite production given the highly development-friendly
location of Hickory-1 within the North Slope. Development of these
reservoirs is anticipated to be via long horizontal production
wells, with numerous production analogues elsewhere demonstrating
many multiple times the flow rates achieved from vertical
wells.
Detailed evaluation of these development options, and pursuit
of the optimal pathway, is the process that we are now set to
undertake over the coming months. This work will be undertaken
alongside the assessment of independent Contingent Resource
declarations for the SFS and SMD reservoirs at Hickory-1, which
will be additive to the BFF Contingent Resource previously
declared. It is a busy and exciting time ahead for 88
Energy."
SMD-B flow test results; further detail
A
20ft perforated interval in the SMD-B reservoir was stimulated via
a single fracture stage comprising 226,967 lbs of proppant volume. The
well was cleaned-up and flowed for 84 hours in total, utilising
nitrogen lift throughout the entire test period. The average fluid
flow rate over the duration of the flow back period was
approximately 445 bbls/d, with choke sizes ranging from 8/64ths to
33/64ths.
The SMD-B test produced at a peak
estimated flow rate of ~50 bopd. Oil cuts varied throughout the
flow back period, reaching a maximum of 10% oil cut. The well
produced at an average oil cut of 4% following initial oil to
surface, with instantaneous rates observed during the 16-hour
period varying as the well cleaned up. Some 70% of stimulation
fluid had been recovered at the conclusion of the test at which
time water salinity measurements indicated that stimulation fluid
was still being recovered and the well was still cleaning up. Oil
cut would be expected to improve once stimulation fluid was fully
recovered.
Multiple oil samples were recovered,
with measured oil gravities of between 38.5 to 39.5 API,
representing a light crude oil.
Importantly, the SMD-B zone flowed
oil to surface with little to no measurable gas, representing a low
GoR production rate. Pressurised oil samples collected during
both the USFS and SMD tests will be transported to laboratories for
further analysis.
The SMD-B flow test was concluded
with sufficient information for the next steps, and the data
recorded will assist 88E in optimisation and design processes in
the next phase of advancement of Project Phoenix.
Hickory-1 flow test unlocks broader Project Phoenix potential;
USFS Recap
Two separate successful flow tests
were conducted at Hickory-1, over the SMD-B and Upper SFS
reservoirs. As previously announced, the deeper USFS reservoir was
initially tested which produced the following results:
·
A 20 ft interval was perforated in the
Upper SFS reservoir which
was then stimulated via a single fracture stage of 241,611 lbs
proppant volume. The zone flowed at a peak flow rate of over 70
bopd. Oil cuts increased throughout the flow back period as the
well cleaned up, reaching a maximum of 15% oil cut. Once oil cut
was established during the natural flow back period the well
produced at an average oil flow rate of approximately 42 bopd
during the natural flow back period.
·
Importantly, the USFS zone flowed oil to surface
under natural flow, with flow back from other reservoirs in
adjacent offset wells only producing under nitrogen lift. Multiple
oil samples were recovered with measured oil gravities of between
39.9 to 41.4 API (a light crude oil).
·
Additionally, some NGLs were produced during the
USFS test, as was anticipated in the planning phase. The presence
of NGLs was demonstrated by samples from the flare line and by
visible black smoke in the flare. The company anticipates
NGLs produced to be at a similar rate to those observed during flow
tests on adjacent acreage given the consistency of results observed
between the USFS test and tests conducted on adjacent wells. It may
be possible to estimate the amount of NGLs that were not measured
in these tests, once fluid characterisation studies are completed
in laboratory. Historically, NGLs prices on the North Slope of
Alaska have been similar to, or slightly below, light oil prices
and are therefore considered highly valuable. Further work is
required to quantify the exact volume of NGLs, which 88 Energy
intends to include as part of a maiden certified Contingent
Resource assessment at Project Phoenix for the SFS and SMD
reservoirs.
Forward plan
The Joint Venture will P&A the
Hickory-1 well with any future appraisal and/or development
activities at this location being via a long horizontal production
well. The rig and associated services are expected to be
off-location within the next ten days. It is anticipated that the
flow test will be concluded at an estimated cost of circa US$14.5
million gross, due to the additional length of
operations.
88 Energy now plans to undertake
post-test studies, including fluid testing to characterise
reservoir fluids, and downhole pressure and temperature data
analysis to determine reservoir properties, at distances beyond the
depth of investigation of the wireline logs. These studies will
then be integrated into existing data sets and models to refine
appraisal and development plans for each reservoir, with pre-FEED
studies expected to commence during 2H 2024. Development of these
reservoirs is anticipated to be via horizontal production wells,
with numerous production analogues elsewhere demonstrating many
multiple times the flow rates achieved from vertical wells.
Additionally, horizontal developments are common practice on the
North Slope of Alaska with Conoco Philips's Alpine and Kuparuk
fields both utilising this technique.
Production rates in long horizontal
production wells are typically multiples of 6 to 12 times higher
than tested in vertical wells, as evidenced in many Lower 48
analogues. Project Phoenix also benefits from the ability to
produce from multiple reservoirs concurrently in a
development.
Commercialisation options for
Project Phoenix are to be advanced in parallel, including farm-out
to a strategic development partner and/or early, capital-lite
production given proximate infrastructure advantages (Hickory-1 is
located right next to the Dalton Highway and TAPS).
In addition, the Company plans to
work with independent geological consultants to secure a Contingent
Resource estimate over the SMD and SFS reservoirs (complementing
the previously announced Contingent Resource estimate over the BFF
reservoir; refer 88E ASX release dated 6 November 2023). Completion
of these estimates is expected during Q2 2024.
Further updates on the Hickory-1
results and Project Phoenix forward plan will be announced in due
course.
Additional
information related to Hickory-1:
Hickory-1 is located in State lands
on the North Slope of Alaska, adjacent to the Dalton Highway and
Trans Alaska Pipeline, within Alaskan Oil and Gas lease ADL 392314.
88 Energy holds a ~75% working interest in the well and is
Operator. The well spudded on 9 March 2023 and was drilled to a
Total Depth of 10,650 feet. Multiple prospective pay zones in
sandstone reservoir between depths 7,700 and 10,500 were
identified.
88 Energy reported a maiden,
independently certified Contingent Resource estimate of 136 MMbbl
of hydrocarbon liquids (gross best estimate (2C)) and 628 BCF of
gas, for the Basin Floor Fan (BFF) reservoir in Project Phoenix on
6 November 2023.
This
announcement has been authorised by the Board.
88
Energy Ltd
Ashley Gilbert, Managing
Director
Tel: +61 8 9485 0990
Email:investor-relations@88energy.com
|
|
|
|
Fivemark Partners, Investor and
Media Relations
|
|
Michael Vaughan
|
Tel: +61 422 602 720
|
|
|
EurozHartleys Ltd
|
|
Dale Bryan
|
Tel: +61 8 9268 2829
|
|
|
Cavendish Capital Markets Limited
|
Tel: +44 (0)207 220 0500
|
Derrick Lee
|
Tel: +44 (0)131 220 6939
|
Pearl Kellie
|
Tel: +44 (0)131 220 9775
|
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the
ASX Listing Rules Chapter 5 and the AIM Rules for Companies, the
technical information and resource reporting contained in this
announcement was prepared by, or under the supervision of, Dr
Stephen Staley, who is a Non-Executive Director of the Company. Dr
Staley has more than 40 years' experience in the petroleum
industry, is a Fellow of the Geological Society of London, and a
qualified Geologist/Geophysicist who has sufficient experience that
is relevant to the style and nature of the oil prospects under
consideration and to the activities discussed in this document. Dr
Staley has reviewed the information and supporting documentation
referred to in this announcement and considers the resource and
reserve estimates to be fairly represented and consents to its
release in the form and context in which it appears. His academic
qualifications and industry memberships appear on the Company's
website and both comply with the criteria for "Competence" under
clause 3.1 of the Valmin Code 2015. Terminology and standards
adopted by the Society of Petroleum Engineers "Petroleum Resources
Management System" have been applied in producing this
document.
Appendix A
Reporting of Material Exploration and Drilling Results
Pursuant to ASX Listing Rules, Chapter 5
ASX
Listing Rule
|
Requirement
|
Hickory-1 Well Test Reporting
|
5.30
|
(a)
|
The name and type of well
|
Hickory-1, vertical exploration
well
|
|
(b)
|
The location of the well and the
details of the permit or lease in which the well is
located
|
Hickory-1 is located in State lands
on the North Slope of Alaska, adjacent to the Dalton Highway and
Trans Alaska Pipeline, within Alaskan Oil and Gas lease ADL
392314
|
|
(c)
|
The Company's working interest in
the well
|
~75%
|
|
(d)
|
Gross pay thickness and net pay
thickness
|
N/A
|
|
(e)
|
Geological rock type of the
formation drilled
|
Sandstone
|
|
(f)
|
Depth of the zones tested
|
SMD-B perforation interval: 7,955' -
7,975' MDRT
|
|
(g)
|
Types of tests undertaken and the
duration of the tests
|
Fracture stimulate and flow test the SMD-B
formation, utilising nitrogen lift. The
well flowed under nitrogen lift for a period of approximately 84
hours, inclusive of clean up and recovery of frac
fluids.
|
|
(h)
|
The hydrocarbon phases recovered in
the tests
|
Oil was recovered during the test,
with little to no measurable gas noted.
|
|
(i)
|
Any other recovery, such as
formation water and water, associated with the tests and their
respective proportions
|
1,551 bbls of water was recovered
during flow back, consisting of frac fluids injected into the
reservoir (approximately 2,144 bbls of fluid was injected during
frack operations). Further analysis of fluids will be conducted
post the flow test to determine extent of reservoir fluids. Total
stimulation load water was not recovered and water salinity
measurements indicated we were recovering load water at the
conclusion of the test.
|
|
(j)
|
The choke size and flow rates and,
if measured, the volumes of the hydrocarbon phases
measured
|
Various choke sizes used during flow
back operations from 8/64ths to 33/64ths of an inch. Total fluid
flow rates (inclusive of recovery of frac fluid) averaged ~445
bbl/d over the duration of the flow back. Oil cut following
establishment of production ranged from 1% to 10%. The well
produced at an average oil cut of 4% following initial oil to
surface, with instantaneous rates observed during the 16 hour
period varying as the well continued to clean up at managed fluid
flow rate of ~170 bbls/d with a calculated total volume during the
flow back period following establishment of oil cut of ~4 stk bbls.
No measurable gas or NGL's were recovered from the SMD-B
test.
|
|
(k)
|
If flow rates were tested,
information about the pressures associated with the flow and the
duration of the test
|
Well head pressures over the
duration of the flow back period ranged from ~200 to 1,780
psig.
|
|
(l)
|
The number of fracture stimulation
stages and the size and nature of fracture stimulation
applied
|
The SMD-B zone was stimulated in a
single stage and utilised a cross-linked polymer gel. The volume of
sand proppant pumped was 226,967 lbs for the SMD-B.
|
|
(m)
|
Any material volumes of
non-hydrocarbon gases, such as carbon dioxide, nitrogen, hydrogen
sulphide and sulphur
|
The SMD-B test showed no measurable
CO2 or H2S. No other impurities were detected
on site.
|
|
(n)
|
Any other information that is
material to understanding the reported results
|
None
|