Financial
Statements
and
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
As
of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 and for the nine-month
periods
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
TELEFONICA
DE ARGENTINA S.A.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Table
of Contents
Balance Sheets as
of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
Statement of
Operations for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 and
2008.
Statement of
Changes in Shareholders' Equity for the nine-month period ended September 30,
2009 and 2008.
Statement of Cash
Flows for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
Notes to Financial
Statements as of September 30, 2009 and comparative information.
Operating and
Financial Review and Prospects.
Independent
Accountants’ Review Report.
TELEFONICA
DE ARGENTINA S.A.
BALANCE
SHEETS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2008 (1)
(amounts
stated in millions of Argentine pesos, restated as described in note
2.1.)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (note
3.1.a)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Investments
(note 19.c)
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
Trade
receivables (note 3.1.b)
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
Other
receivables (note 3.1.c)
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Inventories
(note 3.1.d)
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Total current
assets
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
NONCURRENT
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
receivables (note 3.1.b)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Other
receivables (note 3.1.c)
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Fixed assets
(note 19.a)
|
|
|
4,567
|
|
|
|
4,805
|
|
Intangible
assets (note 19.b)
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
Subtotal
noncurrent assets
|
|
|
4,777
|
|
|
|
5,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
(note 3.1.e)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Total
noncurrent assets
|
|
|
4,839
|
|
|
|
5,105
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
|
6,888
|
|
|
|
6,283
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
payables (note 3.1.f)
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
|
|
935
|
|
Bank and
financial payables (note 3.1.g)
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Payroll and
social security taxes payable (note 3.1.h)
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
Taxes payable
(note 3.1.i)
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
Other
payables (note 3.1.j)
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Reserves
(note 19.d)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
|
2,192
|
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
NONCURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
payables (note 3.1.f)
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
Bank and
financial payables (note 3.1.g)
|
|
|
1,080
|
|
|
|
1,243
|
|
Payroll and
social security taxes payable (note 3.1.h)
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
Taxes payable
(note 3.1.i)
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
Other
payables (note 3.1.j)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Reserves
(note 19.d)
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
Total
noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
1,903
|
|
|
|
2,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LIABILITIES FROM
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
(note 3.1.k)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
4,106
|
|
|
|
3,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
|
|
2,782
|
|
|
|
2,538
|
|
Total
liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
|
|
6,888
|
|
|
|
6,283
|
|
(1) See
note 2.5.
The accompanying
notes 1 to 19 are an integral part of these financial statements.
EDUARDO
FERNANDO CARIDE
Chairman
TELEFONICA
DE ARGENTINA S.A.
STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE-MONTH PERIOD
ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008 (1)
(amounts
stated in millions of Argentine pesos, except for earnings per share ratio and
per ADS ratio,
restated
as described in note 2.1.)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET
REVENUES
|
|
|
4,169
|
|
|
|
3,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COST OF
SERVICES PROVIDED (note 3.1.l)
|
|
|
(1,946
|
)
|
|
|
(1,742
|
)
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
2,223
|
|
|
|
1,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADMINISTRATIVE
EXPENSES (note 19.g)
|
|
|
(412
|
)
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SELLING
EXPENSES (note 19.g)
|
|
|
(1,026
|
)
|
|
|
(739
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER
EXPENSES, NET (note 19.g)
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCIAL
INCOME AND HOLDING GAINS/(LOSSES) ON ASSETS (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange
differences
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Interest and
financial income
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Holding loss
from government securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Holding gain
from financial instruments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCIAL
EXPENSE AND HOLDING (LOSSES)/GAINS ON LIABILITIES (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange
differences
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
Interest and
financial charges
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
Holding loss
from financial instruments
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Net income
before income tax
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME TAX
(note 2.2.k)
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
Net income for
the period
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per
share for the period (4)
|
|
|
0.0349
|
|
|
|
0.0375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per
ADS for the period (4)
|
|
|
1.3974
|
|
|
|
1.5005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Mainly related
to current investments, trade receivables and other
receivables.
|
(3)
|
Mainly related
to trade, bank and financial, taxes, other payables and
reserves.
|
(4)
|
Basic and
diluted earnings per share and American Depositary Shares (“ADS”) are the
same, as there are no outstanding options to purchase shares. Amounts
stated in Argentine pesos (see note
2.2.n).
|
The accompanying
notes 1 to 19 are an integral part of these financial statements.
EDUARDO
FERNANDO CARIDE
Chairman
TELEFONICA
DE ARGENTINA S.A.
STATEMENT
OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY FOR THE NINE-MONTH PERIOD
ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
(amounts
stated in millions of Argentine pesos, restated as described in note
2.1.)
|
|
CAPITAL
STOCK (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominal
value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACCOUNT
|
|
Outstanding
shares
|
|
|
Comprehensive
adjustment to capital stock
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
Legal
Reserve
(1)
|
|
|
Reserve
for
future
dividends (1)
|
|
|
Retained
earnings
(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
1,907
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
2,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appropriation
of retained earnings as approved by the General Ordinary and Special Class
A and Class B Shareholders’ Meeting held on April 21, 2008 (see note
5.)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for
the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
Balance as of
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
1,907
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
2,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for
the three-month period ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Balance as of
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
1,907
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
2,538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appropriation
of retained earnings as approved by the General Ordinary and Special Class
A and Class B Shareholders’ Meeting held on April 20, 2009 (see note
5.)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(337
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for
the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
Balance as of
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
1,907
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
2,782
|
|
The accompanying
notes 1 to 19 are an integral part of these financial statements.
EDUARDO
FERNANDO CARIDE
Chairman
TELEFONICA
DE ARGENTINA S.A.
STATEMENT
OF CASH FLOWS (1) FOR THE NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
2009
AND
2008 (2) (7)
(amounts
stated in millions of Argentine pesos, restated as described in note
2.1.)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
(2)
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
|
1,074
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year (3)
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
Increase
in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
CAUSES
OF CHANGES IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income for the period
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income for the period to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
exchange differences (4)
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Fixed
assets depreciation
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
Material
consumption
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Intangible
assets amortization
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Cost
of services provided
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Holding
loss from financial instruments
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Holding
loss from government securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Increase
in allowance and accruals, net of reversals (6)
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
Income
tax
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
Net
book value of fixed assets and other assets retired
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Interest
and financial charges, net
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
receivables
|
|
|
(208
|
)
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
Current
investments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
Other
receivables
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Trade
payables
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
Payroll
and social security taxes payable
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
Taxes
payable
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
Other
payables
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Collected
interests
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Contingencies
payment
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
Payment
of income tax
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
Cash
flows generated by operating activities
|
|
|
1,271
|
|
|
|
1,410
|
|
Cash
flows used in investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
assets purchases (5)
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
(537
|
)
|
Increase
in intangible assets
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
Cash
flows used in investing activities
|
|
|
(437
|
)
|
|
|
(592
|
)
|
Cash
flows used in financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
short-term loans
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Repayments
of loans
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(436
|
)
|
Interest
paid
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
Cash
flows used in financing activities
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
(487
|
)
|
Increase
in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
(1)
|
Cash and cash
equivalents with original maturities not exceeding three months are
considered to be cash and cash equivalents which totaled: (i) 43 million
and 1,031 million, respectively, as of September 30, 2009, (ii) 33 million
and 349 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2008, (iii) 7 million
and 442 million, respectively, as of September 30, 2008, and (iv) 15
million and 103 million, respectively, as of December 31,
2007.
|
(3)
|
In 2008, cash
at beginning of year do not include 307 million related to discount bond,
Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”) related securities, negotiable obligations
of Telefónica Móviles Argentina S.A. (“TMA S.A.”) and restricted
assets.
|
(4)
|
In 2009 and
2008, net of 31 million and (4) million, respectively, related to exchange
differences originated by cash and cash equivalents denominated in foreign
currency.
|
(5)
|
In 2009 and
2008, net of 147 million and 41 million, respectively, financed by trade
payables.
|
(6)
|
In 2008, it
does not include the increase of the allowance for deferred tax
assets.
|
(7)
|
Prepared
consistently with International Accounting Standard No.
7.
|
The accompanying
notes 1 to 19 are an integral part of these financial statements.
EDUARDO
FERNANDO CARIDE
Chairman
TELEFONICA
DE ARGENTINA S.A.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND
COMPARATIVE
INFORMATION (see note 2.5.)
Amounts stated in
millions of Argentine pesos (except where expressly indicated that figures are
stated in Argentine pesos or other currency)
1.
|
OPERATIONS
OF TELEFONICA
|
Telefónica de
Argentina S.A. (“Telefónica” or “the Company”) holds a license for an unlimited
period of time to provide Basic Telephone Services to the Southern Region of
Argentina (the “Southern region license”), which was exclusive until late
1999.
Additionally, the
Company holds a license agreement from the Secretary of Communications (“S.C.”)
for an unlimited period of time, to provide local and domestic and international
long-distance telephone services and telex services in the Northern region of
the country. The Company’s obligations under this license mainly relate to
service quality and coverage of the areas to be serviced.
On June 9, 2000,
the Federal Executive Power (“PEN”) issued Decree No. 465/00 which provided the
complete deregulation of the telecommunications market as from November 9,
2000.
On September 3,
2000, the PEN issued Decree No. 764/00 which, in the context of such
deregulation, approved the Rules for Licenses for Telecommunication Services,
for the Interconnection, for the Universal Service and for the Management and
Control of Radioelectric Spectrum. These rules constitute the current regulatory
framework applicable to the Company. On September 19, 2000, the Company filed a
reconsideration petition against certain specific issues of Decree No. 764/00.
The Court has not ruled on this issue.
On April 3, 2008,
the PEN issued Decree No. 558/08 which replaces Exhibit III to Decree No. 764/00
concerning the Universal Service Regulations and creates the Trust Fund for the
Universal Service (see note 12.).
In December 2008,
the Company acquired 100% of the capital stock of Telefonica Data Argentina S.A.
(“TDA S.A.”), a company dedicated to telecommunication services supply, integral
advice and consulting services in telecommunication system and information
technologies. The Company has incorporated TDA S.A. by absorption (see note
18.).
The Company’s
short-term strategy has been to adapt its business plans to address the
challenges and risks presented by the 2002 Argentine economic crisis. Therefore,
the Company has focused on the renegotiation of the agreement with the
government and has been taking certain steps to moderate the effects of the
imbalance between changes in revenues and costs caused by the significant
increase in the prices of supplies and the cost of technology–related
investments usually required by the Company’s business, and the situation
affecting service rates described in note 8.1. Some of these measures include:
i) capital expenditure controls, ii) operating cost reduction, iii) stability of
the collection rates and, iv) debt renegotiation and cash
management.
The relationship
between variables determining revenues and expenses was affected as a result of
the conversion into pesos and freezing of the Company’s tariffs within the
context of a potentially inflationary economy and may continue to be mismatched
depending upon the regulatory framework to be designed by the Argentine
Government in the future. The Transfer Contract provides mechanisms to
re-balance the relation between the variables that determine revenues and costs
(including investments), i.e., the so-called "economic and financial equation"
upon the occurrence of certain circumstances (see note 8.). As mentioned in note
2.4., the Public Emergency and Foreign Exchange System Reform Law established
the conversion into pesos of originally US dollar-denominated utility tariffs
previously agreed upon in US dollars at the US$1.00 to AR$1.00 exchange rate and
authorized the PEN to renegotiate agreements. Given this framework, on February
15, 2006, the Renegotiation and Analysis of Public Utilities Agreements Unit
(“UNIREN”) signed, on behalf of the Federal Government and together with the
Company, a Memorandum of Understanding (the "Memorandum of Understanding 2006")
which seeks a commitment to establish in the future a stable legal framework
maintaining the legal conditions set forth in the Transfer Contract and the
rules in force as of the date of such memorandum.
In the opinion of
the Company’s Management, since 2005, there is greater certainty in the
operating and economic environment due to, among other factors, the relative
stabilization in the peso equivalent amounts of its foreign currency denominated
debt, the financing already obtained and the gradual reduction of its financial
debt. Although there is an unstable international financial market scenario,
according to the opinion of the Company’s management, it should not have a
significant impact on the Company’s future operations. However, the Company will
monitor its future development.
Although the
Company has adopted the abovementioned measures to mitigate the effects of
changes in its business resulting from the issue described in the above
paragraphs, the future operating conditions and characteristics might not
continue to be stable to the extent that in the event of new developments in
local and/or international economic context, the regulatory framework may fail
to establish the rules to allow reinstating the balance of the variables that
constitute the Company’s economic and financial equation (see note
8.).
2.
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
|
2.1.
|
Presentation
of financial statements in constant Argentine
Pesos
|
Until March 31,
2002, the Company’s financial statements have been prepared recognizing the
effects of changes in the purchasing power of money only through August 31,
1995, (maintaining the restatements recorded until that date), by the
restatement of amounts to constant pesos, by means of the application of the
restatement method in constant currency as set forth by the Argentine Federation
of Professional Council in Economic Sciences (“FACPCE “) in effect as of that
date. Effective September 1, 1995, for professional accounting principles
approved by the Professional Council in Economic Sciences of the City of Buenos
Aires (“CPCECABA”) (“Argentine GAAP”) purposes, and considering the economic
stability conditions at that moment, and according to the requirements of the
National Securities Commission (“CNV”), the Company discontinued application of
the restatement method. This accounting criterion was accepted by Argentine GAAP
until December 31, 2001.
In 2002, as a
result of the new inflationary conditions, and the changes to the Argentine
economic model resulting from the enactment of the Public Emergency and Foreign
Exchange System Reform Law, the CPCECABA approved the reinstatement of inflation
accounting in financial statements for fiscal years or interim periods ending as
from March 31, 2002, in accordance with Argentine professional accounting
principles, and provided that all recorded amounts restated by changes in the
general purchasing power until the suspension of such adjustments and any other
amounts originated in transactions during the stability period are to be
considered stated in the currency of December 2001.
Presidential Decree
No. 1,269/02 and later CNV Resolution No. 415/02, reestablished the requirement
of presentation of financial statements in constant currency. Nevertheless, in
2003, Presidential Decree No. 664/03 and the later Resolution No. 441/03 of the
CNV set forth again that as from March 1, 2003, the restatement of financial
statements in constant currency should be discontinued.
However, the
CPCECABA discontinued the application of the method that required restatement
into constant currency as from October 2003. In accordance with the
abovementioned, the financial statements of the Company as of September 30, 2009
and 2008 and as of December 31, 2008 have been prepared recognizing the effects
of variations in the purchasing power of the Argentine peso until February 28,
2003 (restated according to changes in the Argentine wholesale price index
published by the Argentine Institute of Statistics and Census (“INDEC”)) in
compliance with the regulations issued by the PEN and the CNV (the accumulated
effect on that index between January 1, 2003 and September 30, 2003, was a 1.4%
decrease). The effect on the Company’s shareholders’ equity as of September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008 and on the results for the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 of not restating figures until September 30, 2003 is
not significant.
The Company applied
the valuation criteria established by CNV regulations for the purposes of these
financial statements, which, in their application to the transactions and the
balances included in these financial statements, do not differ significantly
from the valuation criteria established by Argentine GAAP (see note
16.).
The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with Argentine GAAP requires the Company’s
Management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of these financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses. Final results may differ from those estimated by the Company’s
Management.
Among others, these
financial statements reflect the effects of economic and foreign exchange
regulations that were known as of the date of issuance of these financial
statements. All Company Management estimates have been made accordingly. Some of
these measures, which directly and indirectly affect the Company’s business
relationships, have been challenged in legal actions filed by third parties to
which the Company is not a party. The effects of any additional measures that
could be taken by the Government and the implementation of those
already adopted, as
well as the effects of potential modifications resulting from such legal
actions, will be accounted for when the Company’s Management becomes aware of
them.
Accordingly, the
decisions that are to be made in reliance on these financial statements should
consider the potential future development of such governmental actions, and the
Company’s financial statements should be read in light of these
circumstances.
The principal
valuation methods are:
Amounts in local
currency: stated at nominal value, plus, if applicable, financial income
(expense) accrued as of the end of each period/year.
Amounts in foreign
currency: stated at the exchange rate applicable to its settlement in effect at
the end of each period/year, in accordance with the Company’s intended use,
plus, if applicable, accrued financial income (expense) as of those
dates.
b)
Investments:
Mutual funds:
stated at their net realization value.
|
c)
Receivables and payables:
|
Receivables and
payables in local currency: at nominal value, plus, if applicable, financial
income (expense) accrued as of the end of each period/year, which does not
significantly differ from the amount obtained by calculating the discounted
value of the cash flows that would be derived from the related assets and
liabilities.
Receivables and
payables in foreign currency: valued at the exchange rates applicable to their
settlement prevailing as of the end of each period/year, in accordance with the
Company’s intended use, plus, if applicable, the financial income (expense)
accrued as of those dates, which do not differ from the measurement of the
discounted value based on the rate of each transaction.
Debt refinancing
costs incurred in connection with the issuance of negotiable obligations, are
amortized by the straight-line method as from the issuance date to the maturity
of such negotiable obligations and are disclosed net of the related financial
payables.
Based on the
available information as of the date of issuance of these financial statement
and considering the purchase offer described in note 10.2., the repurchased
negotiable obligations have been valued as of September 30, 2009 at their
settlement cost and disclosed as current “Bank and financial
payables”.
Trade receivables:
includes services provided and net positions with foreign carriers, both billed
and accrued and unbilled as of the end of each period/year, the latter being
determined based upon information about actual consumption, subsequent billings
and estimates using real historical data.
Trade receivables
are disclosed net of the allowance for doubtful accounts, which has been
assessed based on historical data and the estimated trend of collections. The
Company includes as a receivable the portion accrued as of each period/year-end
of the surcharge for late payment included in the invoices for payments until
the “second due-date” of the invoice. For amounts that are past-due after the
second due-date provided in the original invoice, the interest for late payment
is recorded in the cases in which the Company estimates that it will be
recovered.
Receivables and
payables arising from financing leases have been valued, respectively, at
present value of the minimum payments computed at the interest rate implicit in
the leases of the related assets and liabilities (see note
17.).
Services received
from IBM Argentina S.A. (“IBM”): since baseline services committed to be
rendered by IBM over the term of the different contracts will be received by the
Company in uniform quantities over their term, the baseline service total
original cost is accrued based on the straight line method over the term of the
service. The balance included in “Other credits” and “Other payables” as of as
of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, includes (see note
7.1.):
a) The balance of
the decreasing monthly installments paid to IBM as of each period/year-end less
the cost accrued on the straight-line method basis over the term of the
agreements as of each of period/year-end. Service costs renegotiations as agreed
upon between the
parties are accrued
and recorded in the Company’s statement of operations on the fiscal year in
which the services affected by such renegotiations were accrued.
b) Deferred
results: due to the interdependence of the terms of the original agreement for
outsourcing of the service and sale to IBM of the related equipment, and the
repurchase obligation assumed, the loss resulting from the difference between
the repurchase obligation and the market value of the assets to be repurchased
in connection to the renegotiations described in note 7.1 has been deferred and
amortized ratably over the term of the new agreements as part of the cost
accrued for the services therein included.
Tax Compliance Plan
Liabilities: the Company valued its obligation to be paid in 120 installments,
at discounted value of the committed payments as of the closing date of these
financial statements.
The rights of use
links have been valued at acquisition cost restated as indicated in note 2.1.
and are accrued by the straight-line method over the duration of the term of the
rights of 15 years.
Liabilities for
agreements of payments in installments: in February 2009, the Company agreed
with the Compensatory Fund for Retired Telephone Industry Workers on the
differences for claims related to previous periods, whereby the Company agreed
to pay 35.2 million. In addition, and in connection with a claim filed in the
year 2009, the Company agreed to pay 20.8 million in installments. The book
value of such payable was obtained calculating the discounted value cash flows
related to items accrued as of the closing date of these financial
statements.
Universal Service
contribution (see note 12.): the Company calculates the charge for the Universal
Service contribution, consisting of 1% of revenues from telecommunications
services, net of automatic deductions provided by the related regulation and
rules of the National Communications Commission (“CNC”), and in accordance with
the Company’s estimates of the amounts payable during each period/year, based on
current regulations. If resulting, from the above calculation, in a balance
payable, such net amount is booked as a reserve. All deductions and subsidies
that must first be pre-approved by the regulatory entity will be booked by the
Company as receivable in the period/year in which they will probably be
reimbursed by such entity and can be valued with certainty. The Company, as it
was merged with TDA S.A. (see note 18.), has monthly deposited the corresponding
amount until April, 2009 in a Banco de la Nación Argentina account in the name
of TDA S.A. As of the closing date of these financial statements, the balance of
the mentioned account amounts to 3 million.
Pre-retirement
agreements and early retirement plans: the Company values its obligation in
relation to these plans at the present value of the payments agreed as of the
period/year-end (see note 15.).
Performance Share
Plan (“PSA”): this plan is valued on the basis of the fair value of the
securities to be delivered calculated on the date on which the rights are
granted. Such cost is accrued on a straight-line basis during the period/year in
which the services are rendered by the Executives. The fair value amounts to
Euro 7.7, Euro 8.4 and Euro 8.4 per share for the second, third and fourth
cycle, respectively. These amounts are the best benchmark of the fair value of
the rights delivered to Executives, as they correspond to actual market
transactions (see note 15.).
Social Security
Plan for Executives (“ The PSD Plan”): the liability resulting from the social
security plan for Executives is valued based on the estimated amounts that the
Company agreed to contribute as of each period/year-end. Such cost is accrued
during the period/year in which the benefit is granted and the services are
rendered by the Executives. All changes are recognized in the period/year in
which they are approved (see note 15.).
Networks equipment,
equipment and supplies for selling (including telephone accessories and prepaid
cards) have been accounted for at the replacement cost up to the limit of their
estimated realizable value.
Inventories are
accounted for net of the allowance for impairment in value and slow turnover,
determined based on inventory recoverability analysis at the end of each
period/year.
e)
Other assets:
Other assets
include buildings no longer used for the Company’s operations and intended for
sale. The carrying book value has been recorded at amortized restated cost as
described in
note 2.1., if
applicable, which does not exceed its net recoverable value.
The fixed assets
have been valued at cost restated as described in note 2.1. and depreciated by
the straight-line method over their remaining useful lives. When the
construction of works in progress extends over a substantial period of time, its
value includes the cost of financing by third parties related to the investment
during the construction period until such time as the asset is ready to be used
for a productive purpose. As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the
residual value of cumulative capitalized interest on fixed assets is 227 million
and 263 million, respectively.
For fixed assets
whose operating condition warrants replacement earlier than the end of the
useful life assigned by the Company to the fixed asset category, the Company
calculates the depreciation charge based on the adjusted remaining useful life
in accordance with the related asset replacement plan.
The Company
habitually uses third-party sites to install its transmission equipment. The
Company maintains a liability at present value to reflect the removal of assets
installed at third-party sites whose counterpart consists in an increase in the
value of the related fixed asset, which is depreciated on the basis of the
estimated useful life of such asset.
The Company, as it
was merged with TDA S.A. (see note 18.), maintains an allowance for impairment
of fixed assets recorded by TDA S.A. in 2006 amounting to 20 million as of the
closing date of these financial statements.
This allowance
originated a deferred tax asset that amounts to 7 million as of the closing date
of these financial statements.
In periods
subsequent to the recording of the impairment, the Company will analyze the
suitability of reversing it, to the extent that changes in estimates made to
determine recoverable values are verified. In such case, the accounting
measurement of the asset or group of assets will be increased to the lower of:
a) the accounting measurement that the asset or group of assets would have had
if the allowance for impairment had never been recognized; and b) its
recoverable value.
The value of the
Company’s fixed assets net of the allowance of impairment previously mentioned
does not exceed their recoverable value, calculated on the basis of the Company
Management’s best estimate of future discounted cash flows, considering current
information and its estimation of the future level of tariffs. The Company has
monitored the evolution of the macroeconomic variables that affect its business
and, from time to time, it has adjusted its projections based on the latest
trends. Considering the operational strategies available for possible scenarios,
in the opinion of the Company’s Management, it will generate future cash flows
sufficient to recover the fixed assets balances. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
as explained in note 8.1., the Company will continue to monitor the projected
situation and will assess the effect of any new future
developments.
The trademarks have
been valued at acquisition cost restated as described in note 2.1.
Licenses related to
the use of invoicing software: have been valued at their cost, depreciated by
the straight-line method over a 36-month period.
The non-competition
clauses have been valued at acquisition cost and are amortized under the
straight-line method over the term of such agreements.
IT applications and
information systems have been valued at cost, depreciated by the straight-line
method over their remaining useful lives.
The acquired client
portfolio has been valued at acquisition cost and depreciated by the
straight-line method over a 4-year period.
Intangible asset
carrying value as of the closing date of these financial statements does not
exceed recoverable value.
Consisting
of:
1)
|
Positive
goodwill originated as a result of the acquisition of TDA
S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
According to
the purchase method as described in Technical Resolution (“TR”) No. 21 of
the FACPCE, as part of the procedure for distributing the cost amongst the
assets and liabilities of the acquired entity, all the assets and
liabilities of the acquired entity shall be identified, as of the date of
acquisition, including those not previously recognized by the acquired
entity for not meeting the requirements established by Section 4 of TR No.
16. Regarding the acquisition of capital stock of TDA S.A., the Company
has identified higher values of certain assets that had not been
previously recognized in TDA S.A.’s books considering the conditions
previously mentioned. Given that as of the date of issuance of these
financial statements the Company is evaluating the information necessary
to determine the current value of such assets at the time of the
acquisition and subsequently, their recognition, the Company has recorded
such capital stock acquisition temporarily considering that the mentioned
assets are a part of goodwill until the mentioned evaluation is
completed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consequently,
the goodwill value corresponds to the difference between the acquisition
cost and the fair value of TDA S.A.’s identifiable net assets at the time
of the capital stock acquisition, as mentioned above. The Company has
determined that such goodwill has an indefinite useful life, as it
considers that there is no foreseeable limit on the period during which it
will generate earnings for the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
2)
|
Positive
goodwill from the acquisition of Telecomunicaciones y Sistemas S.A.
(“TYSSA”), recorded by the Company as it was merged with TDA S.A., net of
gains/losses from intercompany transactions, which has been restated as
described in note 2.1.
|
|
|
|
|
3)
|
Positive
goodwill originated as a result of the acquisition of Adquira, recorded by
the Company as it was merged with TDA S.A., which has been restated as
described in note 2.1.
|
|
As positive
goodwills related to TYSSA and Adquira mentioned in 2) and 3) above, do not have
a defined useful life that would allow to estimate a systematic method in order
to calculate their amortization, considering the time extent during which they
will generate earnings for the Company and in accordance with professional
accounting standards, their amortization was discontinued in the period ended on
March 31, 2006.
The recoverability
of the book value of the goodwill of TDA S.A. is based on the Company
Management’s best estimate of discounted future cash flows considering available
information. The Company’s Management monitors the evolution of the
macroeconomic variables that affect the business and, from time to time, it
adjusted the projections based on the latest trends.
During the normal
course of business, the Company is subject to several labor, commercial, tax and
regulatory claims. While all such actions are being contested, the outcome of
such individual matters is not predictable with certainty. Charges have been
recorded for contingencies where it is probable that the Company will incur a
loss. The amount of loss, including accrued litigation fees at the end of the
period/year, is based on the Company Management’s assessment of the likelihood
of occurrence taking into account legal counsel’s opinion regarding the
matter.
|
j)
Financial instruments:
|
The Company uses
currency swaps which, in the context of the Convertibility Law between the U.S.
dollar and the Argentine peso, were intended to eliminate the variability in the
cash flows of its debts denominated in yen, and to reduce fluctuations in the
exchange rate between the yen and the U.S. dollar so that, the Company can
ensure a fixed exchange rate between the yen and the U.S. dollar for these
obligations paying a fixed percentage for the coverage. As of September 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, the hedge relationships were deemed to be ineffective
because of the devaluation of the peso and the freezing of the Company’s
tariffs.
In addition, the
Company uses currency forward agreements in order to eliminate variability in
the cash flows of its indebtedness in U.S. dollars in relation to the Argentine
peso. The Company valued its hedged obligations at the prevailing exchange rate
and separately
recognized the
financial instruments at their estimated market value. As of September 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008 the hedge relationships were deemed to be
effective.
|
k)
Income tax and tax on minimum presumed
income:
|
The Company records
income tax by applying the deferred method.
Deferred tax assets result
from the temporary differences arising from allowances, accruals, financial
charges that are not yet deductible for tax purposes and tax loss carryfowards.
Deferred tax liabilities result mainly from temporary differences between the
carrying amount restated as described in note 2.1. and the value for tax
purposes of fixed assets, mainly due to the effect of the restatement applied to
fiscal years 2002 and 2003, due to different depreciation criteria and to the
treatment of capitalized interest.
In order to book
the temporary differences, the Company applied the liabilities method, which
establishes the determination of net deferred tax assets or liabilities based on
temporary differences charged to the “Income tax” caption in the statement of
operations.
The Company
recognizes the difference between the adjusted for inflation book value of fixed
assets (and other non-monetary assets) and their taxable basis as a temporary
difference for deferred tax purposes. As of September 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008, the resulting deferred tax liabilities amount to 449 million and 531
million, respectively.
The Company’s
Management evaluates the recoverability of deferred tax assets based on
estimates. Ultimately, the recoverability of deferred tax assets depends upon
the Company’s ability to generate enough taxable income during the periods in
which these temporary differences are expected to be deductible.
Considering their
estimates, the Company’s Management takes into account the reversal time period
of deferred tax liabilities, projected taxable income and tax planning
strategies. This assessment is based on a series of internal forecasts updated
to reflect current trends. In accordance with accounting principles in force,
the Company must recognize deferred tax assets when future deductibility is
likely. As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, based on the information
and projections available as of those dates and considering the reversal of
deferred tax assets and liabilities and the variables affecting future taxable
income, including the foreign exchange rate, the inflation for the coming years,
and the reduction in foreign currency debt, the Company estimates that the
deferred tax assets will probably be recovered, except for the specific tax loss
carryforward balance.
The following table
presents the components of the Company’s deferred tax balances:
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
Deferred tax
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax on
general tax loss carryforwards
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Income tax on
specific tax loss carryforwards resulting from the disposal of shares
(1)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Allowance for
doubtful accounts
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Accrual for
reserves and other non-deductible allowances and accruals
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
Allowance for
impairment of fixed assets
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Other
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
Allowance for
specific tax loss carryforwards
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
receivables
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Fixed and
intangible assets
|
|
|
(512
|
)
|
|
|
(615
|
)
|
Dismissal
accrual for tax purposes
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Other
liabilities
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
(529
|
)
|
|
|
(632
|
)
|
Total
deferred tax liabilities, net
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
(1)
|
Relates to 15
million of specific tax loss carryforward maturing in
2012.
|
The following is
the reconciliation of the income tax amount resulting from the application of
the related tax rate on net income before tax and the amount charged to the
statement of operations for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and
2008:
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Net income
before tax at statutory income tax rate
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
non-taxable results
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-deductible
expenses
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance of
differed tax assets (1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
(1)
|
Disclosed
under the caption “Net liabilities from discontinued operations”. See note
3.1.k.
|
The Company is no
longer subject to new income tax examinations by tax authorities for years
before 2002. Fiscal year 2003 and beyond remain subject to examination by the
Argentine Tax Authorities (“AFIP”).
Whenever
applicable, the Company will recognize any interest and penalties related to
uncertain tax positions as financial expenses. The Company’s Management does not
believe there will be any additional material changes related to uncertain tax
positions over the next twelve months.
Additionally, the
Company calculates minimum presumed income tax by applying the effective tax
rate of 1% on certain production assets valued according to the tax regulations
in effect as of the end of the period/year. This tax is supplementary to income
tax. The Company’s tax liabilities for each fiscal year will be the higher of
these two taxes. However, if the minimum presumed income tax exceeds income tax
during one fiscal year, such excess may be computed as prepayment of any income
tax excess over the minimum presumed income tax that may arise in the next ten
fiscal years. As of September 30, 2009, the Company maintains 20 million as
minimum presumed income tax capitalized from previous fiscal years, which were
disclosed net of income tax provision included in “Current taxes
payable”.
|
l)
Shareholders' equity accounts:
|
Shareholders'
equity accounts have been restated, if applicable, as described in note 2.1.
except for “Capital stock – Nominal value – Outstanding shares”, which is stated
at its original amount. The adjustment required to restate this account in
constant Argentine pesos (see note 2.1.) is included in the “Comprehensive
adjustment to capital stock”.
m)
Statements of operations captions:
- Revenues
and expenses are charged to income on an accrual basis. The Company recognizes
income from fixed telephony services (local and long-distance and access to the
network, among others) based on the use of the network. Charges from the
installation of new telephone lines are recorded as income in the term related
to the estimated remaining average life of the relation with the customer and
the costs associated with these charges are recorded as expense in the term
related to the estimated useful life of the related fixed assets.
- The
Company recognizes income from sales of equipment when such equipment is
delivered and accepted by its customers. For contracts where the Company
provides customers with an indefeasible right to use network capacity, the
Company recognizes revenue ratably over the term of stated life of the
agreement. In addition, the effects of the adjustment of prices agreed upon with
customers in relation to services rendered are recognized when all necessary
conditions are met to consider them as revenues.
- The
revenues and costs related to the data transmission service (national Virtual
Private Networks, satellite services, among others) are recognized in the period
in which the services are rendered. Consulting services are recognized
considering the percentage of completion of the related contracts or projects
and the acceptance by the customer.
- As
of each period / fiscal year-end, the Company had agreements with the following
resellers or
distributors:
i)
|
Other
operators of telecommunication services, such as (1) local and/or
long-distance providers, (2) cellular and PCS licensees, and (3) other
minor providers of telecommunication services related to interconnection
services that primarily include access, termination and long-distance
transport of calls. The interconnection traffic is principally calculated
on a per minute usage basis. Additionally these agreements usually include
point-to-point leased circuits out of which the Company collects fees from
installation and monthly charges. Fees from installation are collected
only once. The Company collects monthly charges depending on: (i) type of
line, (ii) bandwidth, (iii) distance between points leased; (iv) duration
of the contract and (v) usage of the lines.
|
|
|
|
|
ii)
|
Distribution
of prepaid cards: the Company sells prepaid cards through resellers. From
the sale of prepaid cards, the Company charges the face value thereof less
a wholesale discount of face value depending on the volume and product.
The Company recognizes revenue and costs directly attributed to prepaid
cards based on the usage of the network.
|
|
|
|
|
iii)
|
Third parties
operating public phones: The operator of the public phone charges its
customers for each call based on usage units. The operator receives an
average variable compensation. The Company also charges the operator
installation fees and monthly basic charges for its lines in
service.
|
|
|
|
|
iv)
|
Foreign
(non-Argentine) telecommunications carriers and administrations (“foreign
carriers”) for calls carried by the Company covering virtually all
international long-distance calls into or out of Argentina. Agreements
govern payments to foreign carriers for the use of such carriers’
facilities in connecting international calls billed in Argentina and the
payments by the foreign carriers for the use of facilities of Argentine
carriers in connecting international calls billed abroad. The rates of
payment under such agreements are negotiated with each foreign carrier.
The practice among carriers is for payments due for the use of overseas
networks to be recorded, collected and forwarded by the carriers in the
country from which the call is initiated. Settlements among carriers are
usually made on a net basis.
|
|
- Recognition
of Telinver S.A. sale: in relation to the sale of its interest in Telinver S.A.
the Company granted a guarantee to Telefónica Publicidad e Información S.A.
(“TPI”) and to Telefónica Publicidad e Información Internacional S.A. (“TPII”),
which make up the TPI group (“TPI Group”) and Telinver S.A. (see note 13.). For
such guarantee, the Company has deferred booking the income from the sale in the
amount of 11 million as of the closing date of these financial statements (see
note 3.1.k) until the uncertainty related thereto is resolved, so that it will
be probable that the Company receives the economic benefits associated to the
disposal for that amount (see note 13.).
- Charges
for the consumption and amortization of non-monetary assets (materials,
intangible assets and fixed assets) have been stated based on the inflation
adjusted amounts of such assets , if applicable (see note 2.1.).
- Financial
income/(expense) and holding gains/(losses) include: a) financial income and
expenses, b) exchange differences generated by assets and liabilities in foreign
currency, and c) holding gains and losses from government securities and
financial instruments.
n)
Net earnings per share and per ADS:
The Company
calculates the net earnings per share and per ADS on the basis of the Company’s
common outstanding shares of 6,984,200,296 of AR$ 0.1 face value and one vote
per share. One ADS is equal to forty shares.
|
2.3.
|
Public
Emergency Law– rules and regulations currently in
force
|
Starting in early
December 2001, the federal authorities implemented several monetary and foreign
exchange control measures, announcing that the country would default on the
payment of services of its sovereign debt, and enacting Law No. 25,561 of Public
Emergency and Foreign Exchange System Reform that implied a change in the
economic model in force as of that time and amended the Convertibility Law, in
force since March 1991 (mainly due to the devaluation of the peso and the
conversion to pesos of the obligations to deliver sums of money, both related
and not related to the financial system).
Other regulations
were subsequently issued, amending some of the abovementioned
regulations. The
main aspects of such other regulations as of the approval of these financial
statements are:
a) Public
Emergency and Foreign Exchange System Reform Law provided for the conversion
into pesos of public utility rates that had been agreed upon in U.S. dollars at
the AR$ 1 = US$ 1 rate and it authorized the Federal Executive to renegotiate
the agreement (see note 8.1.);
On February 15,
2006, the Company and the Argentine government, through the UNIREN, executed the
Memorandum of Understanding 2006. After the procedures provided for in current
regulations are met, this instrument will be the necessary background to execute
the Protocol of Renegotiation of the Transfer Contract approved by Decree No.
2,332/90 (“Protocol of Renegotiation”), as provided for Law No. 25,561, section
9.
Among other
aspects, the Memorandum of Understanding 2006 discusses the following main
issues:
1)
|
Investments:
the Company will continue making investments for the technological upgrade
and development of its network and new services.
|
|
2)
|
Service and
long-term targets (see note 6.).
|
|
3)
|
Contractual
compliance (see note 6.).
|
|
4)
|
Regulatory
framework (see notes 8.1. and 12.).
|
|
5)
|
Stay of
actions and subsequent waiver of rights and withdrawal of actions (see
notes 6. and 8.1.).
|
|
6)
|
Adjustment of
value in International Incoming Calls in the local area through the
application of a correction factor, so that the value mentioned in Section
37, Exhibit II, Decree No. 764/00 undergoes a three-fold
increase.
|
|
7)
|
Unification
of the low rate time band for local calls, national and international
long-distance calls starting as from the implementation of the Protocol of
Renegotiation.
|
|
8)
|
Equal
treatment: in the context of the process to renegotiate the contracts, the
Argentine government undertakes to treat the Company on the basis of terms
reasonably similar to those afforded to other telecommunication companies
participating in the process.
|
|
The Memorandum of
Understanding 2006 was submitted to a Public Hearing in order to promote the
involvement of users and the community at large so that its terms and conditions
will be based on a consensus to move forward with the execution of the Protocol
of Renegotiation. The public hearing was held on April 28, 2006 in the city of
Mar del Plata, Argentina. Additionally, the Memorandum of Understanding 2006
shall be subject to any further approvals required by currently applicable rules
and regulations; and
b) an
extension of the National Public Emergency situation through December 31,
2009.
2.4.
|
Concentration
of operations and credit risk
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the
Company’s Management opinion, it does not have a significant credit risk
concentration. The Company analyzes potentially doubtful accounts and
records the related allowance. The maximum credit risk involved does not
differ significantly from the accounts receivables amount net reflected in
the balance sheet.
|
|
|
|
|
2.5.
|
Comparative
Financial Statements
|
|
|
As from TDA
S.A.’s capital stock acquisition in December 2008, as described in note
18., the Company disclosed as supplementary information consolidated
financial statements with its subsidiary company as of December 31, 2008
and as of March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
According to
the Preliminary Merger Agreement and the schedule defined by the Company,
it was established as a reorganization date January 1, 2009, whereas on
May 1, 2009, TDA S.A. operating and accounting systems were incorporated
into the Company’s systems and both companies’ operations were unified
(see note 18.)
|
|
|
The Company
presents its balance sheet figures as of September 30, 2009, along with
the balances as of December 31, 2008, for comparative purposes, of TDA
S.A. as from the date of acquisition of the mentioned company. Therefore,
the Company’s balances corresponding to previous periods to the
acquisition date, do not include the effects of TDA S.A.’s operations, in
accordance with the above mentioned criteria.
|
|
|
Consequently,
according to TR N°8 and considering the above mentioned, the Company’s
financial statements as of September 30, 2009, and for the nine-month
period then ended, have been presented with the following comparative
information:
|
|
-
|
Balance
sheet: information on the Company’s balance sheet figures as of December
31, 2008, including for comparative purposes, TDA S.A.’s balance sheet
figures as of such date.
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
Statements of
operations, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows: information on
the Company for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008, which does
not include the effects of TDA S.A.’s operations for that
period.
|
|
|
2.6.
|
Technical
Resolution No. 26
|
In April, 2009, the
CPCECABA approved Resolution CD No. 25/2009, whereby it approved the Second Part
of Technical Resolution No. 26 ("TR No. 26") "Professional Accounting Standards:
Adoption of the International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") of the
International Accounting Standards Board”, which was previously approved by the
FACPCE on March 20, 2009.
TR No. 26 sets
forth that IFRS shall be applied mandatorily, comprehensively and without any
modification, to the consolidated financial statements and to financial
statements of entities, that are not required to prepare consolidated financial
statements, effective for fiscal years beginning as from January 1, 2011, and
for the interim periods related to the mentioned fiscal years, for all entities
subject to the public offering regime, either offering their capital stock or
their negotiable obligations considering certain exceptions. Early adoption is
prohibited. In addition, the abovementioned resolution establishes that entities
shall file certain supplementary information in connection with the transition
period to IFRS.
In connection with
the application of IFRS, the CNV Board of Directors approved the general
guidelines of an implementation plan for the adoption of IFRS submitted by the
FACPCE, and prepared a draft General Resolution (“the Draft") adopting TR No. 26
approved by the FACPCE with specific provisions, defining certain aspects
related to the preparation of financial statements, operating and financial
review and prospects, and corporate issues. It also requires the submission of a
specific IFRS implementation plan that must be approved by the Board of
Directors of the issuer.
As of the date of
issuance of these financial statements, the Draft is still in consultation
period, therefore it will only become mandatory for the Company when the CNV
approves the corresponding general resolution.
|
Because of
the Company’s ordinary operations and due to the indebtedness incurred to
finance such operations, the Company is exposed to several financial
market risks. The main financial risks affecting the Company
are:
|
|
|
.
Exchange rate risk: mainly arising from the existence of
indebtedness incurred in foreign currencies.
|
|
|
.
Interest rate risk: arising as a consequence of the variation in the
financial costs of indebtedness incurred at variable interest rate (or
maturing in a short term and expected to be renewed), and the fluctuation
of interest rates and of the value of long-term liabilities with fixed
interest rates.
|
|
|
The Company
enters into financial instruments over exchange rates to manage
risks.
|
|
|
Exchange
rate management policy
|
|
|
An essential
element of the Company’s exchange rate management policy is to minimize
the negative financial results due to variations in exchange rates,
notwithstanding the maintenance of open currency positions (under strict
risk supervision).
|
|
|
Additionally,
exchange risk management has the following objectives: (i) to secure
payments in foreign currency, hedging firstly short-term payments and then
hedging the long-term ones (partially using derivative financial
instruments), (ii) to cover (at least partially) the Company's debts in
foreign currency as disclosed in the balance sheet and (iii) to modify the
composition of the Company's financial debts with respect to the original
currency and/or to refinance it by issuing peso-denominated debt or
entering into agreements for peso denominated debts.
|
|
|
The main
aspects of the Company's hedging policy are the following:
|
|
|
(i) Existence
of clearly identified risk and risk management objectives and
strategies.
|
|
|
Since the
Convertibility Law pegged the peso to the U.S. dollar at value of AR$1 per
US$1, exchange rates risks were mainly related to changes in the value of
the peso/U.S. dollar in comparison with currencies other than the
Argentine peso and the U.S. dollar. In January 2002, the Argentine
government devalued the Argentine peso and currently the peso/U.S. dollar
exchange rate is determined by a free market.
|
|
|
Until 2002,
the Company did not hedge its U.S. dollar-denominated debt obligations
because under the Convertibility Law the peso/U.S. dollar exchange rate
was essentially fixed at parity and the Company had revenues stream linked
to the U.S. dollar because rates were denominated in U.S. dollars and
converted into pesos at the date of billing. However, in some cases, the
Company hedged U.S. dollars against Japanese yen (see point iii.a)).
Before the Convertibility Law, according to the Transfer Contract, tariffs
were denominated in Argentine pesos. Its intangibility was safeguarded by
the application of the monthly Consumer Price Index in Argentina or, if
there were significant differences between this index and the variation of
the U.S. dollar, by the result obtained from the application of a
polynomial formula that considers 40% of the monthly variation of the
price of the U.S. dollar and 60% of the variation of the monthly Consumer
Price Index in Argentina. Since the end of the Convertibility Law almost
all of the Company's revenues were stated in pesos but almost all of the
Company's debt was denominated in foreign currency, so the Company had a
mismatch between revenues and its financial debt in foreign
currency.
|
|
|
As a
consequence of this mismatch the Company established a policy of hedging
the Company’s exposure to exchange rate risk derived from the fluctuation
between the value of the peso against foreign currencies and certain debt
obligations denominated in foreign currencies.
|
|
|
(ii) Main
features of the underlying to be hedged and of the associated derivative
instruments.
|
|
|
The Company
performs a process to identify the notionals, together with the
characteristics of the derivative instrument to be associated to the
underlying instrument. Notwithstanding this, the lack of depth or
narrowness of the Argentine derivatives markets has led historically to
imbalances between the characteristics of the hedges and the underlying
debts, which have not been significant with respect to the purpose of the
hedge. The Company intends to reduce those imbalances, as long as this
does not involve disproportionate transaction costs.
|
|
|
The Company
documents at the inception of the transaction the relationship between
hedging instruments and hedged items; this process includes linking all
the derivatives designated as hedges to specific assets and liabilities or
to specific firm commitments in foreign currency.
|
|
|
(iii) Ability
to revaluate derivative instruments at market prices.
|
|
|
The Company
uses internal valuations for the derivatives instruments which are
verified with independent parties' valuations (essentially, bank
valuations).
|
|
|
Financial
instruments:
|
|
|
As part of
its hedging policy, the Company has entered into the following financial
instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
In September 1999,
the Company entered into a foreign currency swap agreement with Citibank N.A. to
hedge the risk of fluctuations in the yen-U.S. dollar exchange rate, in
connection with the loan whose nominal amount as of the closing date of these
financial statements was 1.6 billion yen granted by The Export Import Bank of
Japan (currently the Japan Bank for International Cooperation) and maturing in
February 2011, which accrues interest at a rate of 2.3% per annum. The swap
agreement provides a fixed exchange rate of 104.25 yen per U.S. dollar. The
interest rate to be paid to Citibank N.A. during the validity of the loan for
the U.S. dollars received is 7.98% per annum. As of the closing date of these
financial statements, the related liability, taking into account the effect of
the swap and the additional interest accrued, amounts to US$ 16 million. The
contract establishes, among other provisions customary for this type of
transaction, certain events of default under which the creditor may accelerate
payment terms. Events of default include failure to pay financial debts for
amounts in excess of 2% of the Company's shareholders' equity. As of September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the hedge relationships of this swap were deemed
to be ineffective (see note 2.2.j).
b)
|
Foreign
currency forward agreements:
The Company
uses foreign currency forward agreements, to hedge the risk associated
with the exposure to the exchange rate of financial indebtedness and trade
payables
|
denominated in US
dollars. As of the closing date of these financial statements, the Company had
entered into foreign currency forward agreements with local banks, offsetting at
maturity, for a total of US$ 138 million. The maturity of these agreements occur
from October 2009 to May 2010. The average exchange rate agreed upon for these
transactions was AR$ 4.1727 per U.S. dollar. As of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, the hedge relationships were deemed to be effective (see note
2.2.j).
In addition, as of
the closing date of these financial statements, the Company has foreign currency
forward agreements with the Rosario Futures Exchange (“ROFEX”) for a total
amount of US$ 15 million, whose maturity occurs from November, 2009 to July
2010. Regarding the abovementioned agreements, the Company performs daily
adjustments to the compensation
account, in order to
reflect the variations relative to the market, considering the agreed average
exchange rate of AR$ 4.0510 per U.S. dollar, fulfilling the collateral margins
required for its transactions. For that purpose, the Company has made guarantee
deposits in order to ensure that the collateral margins required by the ROFEX
are met (see note 14.). As of September 30, 2009, the hedge relationships were
deemed to be effective (see note 2.2.j).
3.
|
DETAIL
OF THE MAIN BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
ACCOUNTS
|
3.1 Breakdown
of the main accounts
Below is a
breakdown of the main accounts (foreign currency balances are presented in note
19.f):
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Banks
(1)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Total
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
(1)
|
In 2009 and
2008, it includes 3 million and 2 million, respectively, deposited in a
TDA S.A.’s bank account in compliance with the CNC’s requirement regarding
the Universal Service Contribution. See note 12.
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Without
maturity
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Past due (2)
(3)
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Current
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Subtotal
(1)
|
|
|
1,090
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Allowance for
doubtful accounts (note 19.d)
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
(202
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
(1)
|
In 2009 and
2008, it includes 73 million and 54 million, respectively, corresponding
to related companies (see note 11.3.).
|
|
(2)
|
In 2009 and
2008, net of 1 million, respectively, fully
reserved.
|
|
(3)
|
Based on
estimated probable collection terms, 4 million of past due receivables are
disclosed as noncurrent as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively.
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Receivables
from related companies (1)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Guarantee
deposits
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Legal
deposits
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Prepayments
to vendors and others
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Minimum
presumed income tax (5)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Prepaid
insurance
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Rights of use
(3)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Guaranteed
receivables
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Financial
instruments (4)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Tax
credits
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other
(2)
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Allowance for
other receivables (note 19.d)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Total
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
(2)
|
In 2009 and
2008, net of 9 million, respectively, fully
reserved.
|
(3)
|
In 2009 and
2008, includes 1 million, as current amount, and 4 million, as noncurrent
amount, corresponding to related companies (see note
11.3.).
|
(4)
|
In 2009 and
2008, includes foreign currency swap agreements. See note
2.7.
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Telephone
equipment and other materials
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Services in
process for third parties
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Allowance for
impairment in value and slow turnover (note 19.d)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Total
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
TDA S.A.
goodwill (1)
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
TYSSA and
Adquira goodwill (1)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Total
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Vendors,
contractors and carriers (1)
|
|
|
953
|
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Management
fee (2)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Brand license
(2)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Collections
on account and behalf of cellular and audiotext companies
(1)
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Services
collected in advance (3)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
Deferred
income
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
(1)
|
In 2009 and
2008, it includes 110 million and 46 million, respectively, corresponding
to related companies (see note 11.3.).
|
|
(2)
|
See notes
11.2. and 11.3.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes
deferred revenues related to the sale of indefeasible rights to use
network capacity, recognized by the straight-line method during the term
of the agreement. In 2009 and 2008, includes 2 million and 3 million,
respectively, as current amount, and 49 million and 50 million,
respectively, as noncurrent amount, corresponding to related companies
(see note 11.3.).
|
|
g)
|
Bank
and financial payables:
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Negotiable
obligations (1)
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
1,012
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
Long-term
financing
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Foreign bank
loans
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Credit
balances with banks
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
1,080
|
|
|
|
1,243
|
|
h)
|
Payroll
and social security taxes payable:
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Vacation and
bonus accrual
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Social
security taxes payable
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Pre-retirement
agreements and others (1) (2)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
Social
security plan for executives (2)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
(1)
|
Includes 10
million related to benefits granted to employees included in such
agreements, which are to be allocated by them to social security tax
payments for the period between the date of the agreement and the closing
date of these financial statements, and are to be paid by the Company
until the worker qualifies to obtain legal pension
benefits.
|
|
(2)
|
See note
15.
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Income tax
and tax on minimum presumed income (1)
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Turnover tax
accrual
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Value-added
tax
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Health and
safety assessments
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Deferred tax
liabilities, net (1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
Other
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Payables to
related companies (1)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Financial
instruments (2)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Capital stock
reduction (1)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Total
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
(2)
|
In 2009 and
2008, it includes foreign currency forward agreements. See note
2.7.
|
k)
|
Net
liabilities from discontinued
operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Deferred
income – Sale of Telinver S.A. (1)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Deferred tax
assets (2)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
(2)
|
In 2009 and
2008, includes 16 million, respectively, fully reserved. See note
19.d).
|
l)
|
Cost
of services provided:
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Operating
expenses (note 19.g)
|
|
|
(1,925
|
)
|
|
|
(1,730
|
)
|
Cost of good
sold (note 19.e)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Total
|
|
|
(1,946
|
)
|
|
|
(1,742
|
)
|
3.2
|
Aging
of current investments, receivables and payables as of September 30,
2009
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
(b)
|
|
|
|
Current
investments
|
|
|
Trade
receivables
|
|
|
Other
receivables
|
|
|
Trade
payables
|
|
|
Bank
and financial payables
|
|
|
Payroll
and social security taxes payable
|
|
|
Taxes
payable
|
|
|
Other
payables
|
|
Past
Due:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up to three
months
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
From three to
six months
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
From six to
nine months
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
From nine to
twelve months
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
From one to
two years
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
From two to
three years
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Over three
years
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Without
maturity
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
27
|
(c)
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up to three
months
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
862
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
From three to
six months
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
From six to
nine months
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
From nine to
twelve months
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
From one to
two years
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
1,047
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
From two to
three years
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
From three to
four years
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
From four to
five years
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Over five
years
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Subtotal:
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
|
|
1,094
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
1,221
|
|
|
|
1,455
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Allowance for
doubtful accounts
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Benefits
under the Collective Bargaining Agreements
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
|
|
864
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
1,221
|
|
|
|
1,455
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
accruing interest at fixed rate
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
79
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
Percentage
accruing interest at variable rate
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
%
(a)
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Percentage
accruing variable rent
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
average interest rate in foreign currency
|
|
|
-
|
(d)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
Annual
average interest rate in local currency
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
(a)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
(e)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(a)
|
Such
percentage is related to the portion of receivables over which surcharges
are applicable for being in arrears. The rate indicated is that related to
bills with such surcharges.
|
|
(b)
|
Net
liabilities from discontinued operations are not
included.
|
|
(c)
|
Includes 3
million related to capital stock reduction described in note
5.
|
|
(d)
|
Accruing
interest at a rate less than 1%.
|
|
(e)
|
Corresponding
to the specific interest rate.
|
4. REGISTRABLE
ASSETS
On October 27,
1994, “ENTel en liquidación” issued Resolution No. 96/94 whereby it undertakes
to perform all the necessary acts to accomplish the transfer of title of
registrable assets for such time as was necessary, notifying Telefónica 60 days
before the date of expiration of ENTel´s commitment. This resolution recognized
that the licensee companies would be entitled to claim the indemnity stipulated
in the Transfer Contract for real property whose title had not been conveyed to
them by the expiration date. As of the closing date of these financial
statements, these assets have a net book value of about 510 million and
approximately 444 million of them (both amounts restated as described in note
2.1.) were registered in the Company’s name. In the Company’s Management
opinion, the registration of title of a major portion of the most significant
assets contributed by ENTel will be successfully completed. Accordingly, in the
Company Management's opinion the final outcome of this matter will not have a
significant impact on the Company's results of operations and/or its financial
position.
5. CAPITAL
STOCK
Over the last
fiscal years, the Company's capital stock has been as follows (amounts stated in
Argentine pesos):
Classes
of shares
|
Capital
stock as of December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008 and as of September 30, 2009
(1)
|
Class A
(2)
|
436,738,868.0
|
Class B
(2)
|
261,681,161.6
|
Total
|
698,420,029.6
|
(1)
|
Subscribed
and paid in, outstanding and authorized for public offering as of each
date.
|
(2)
|
All shares
have equal voting rights.
|
As of the closing
date of these financial statements, the Company’s capital stock is comprised of
two classes of common stock, with par value 0.10 per share: (1) 4,367,388,680
Class A Shares representing approximately 62.5% of the capital stock and (2)
2,616,811,616 Class B Shares representing approximately 37.5% of the capital
stock. The Company issued 174,605,007 ADS, each representative of forty
shares.
On June 23, 2009,
the Company received a notification from its indirect shareholder Telefónica,
S.A. (“TSA”), which states, following the intimation received from a minority
shareholder, TSA willingness to acquire the entire capital stock held by
minority shareholders in accordance with of Decree No. 677/01, which was
notified to the CNV on that same date. Pursuant to the provisions of Decree No.
677/01, Section 28, the Company will, in due time, proceed to withdraw the
shares from the stock exchange. On July 7, 2009, both the Company’s Board of
Directors and the Company’s Audit Committee issued their respective statements
declaring that the price offered by TSA, equivalent to $ 1 per share of $ 0.10
face value is fair. The Company’s Statutory Auditor’s Commission issued a
statement on that date declaring that the process was in compliance with
applicable rules and regulations. Although the Company has submitted the
required information to the CNV, as of the date of issuance of these financial
statements, this regulatory authority has not ruled on this issue.
Appropriation of retained
earnings
In accordance with
the provisions of the Companies Law No. 19,550, the Company’s by-laws and CNV’s
regulations, the Company must appropriate at least 5% of the net income for the
year (considering the effect of previous years’ adjustments) to the legal
reserve, after absorbing accumulated losses, if any, until such reserve equals
20% of the adjusted capital stock, if any.
Given that the
total balance of the legal reserve account was appropriated to accumulated
losses account as of December 31, 2005, the Company had to restore such reserve
through no less than 5% of the income for the year up to 20% of the Company’s
capital stock plus the balance recorded under the comprehensive adjustment to
capital stock account.
The Company’s
General Ordinary and Special Shareholders’ Meetings held by Class A and B
shareholders on April 21, 2008, resolved, with respect to the 72 million
unappropriated retained earnings recorded as of December 31, 2007, to
appropriate 4 million to the legal reserve and 68 million to the reserve for
future dividends.
The Company’s
General Ordinary and Special Class A and B Shareholders’ Meeting held on April
20, 2009, resolved, in relation to the retained earnings amounting to 337
million as of December 31, 2008, to appropriate them to the legal reserve, and
to deduct from the reserve for future dividends the amount of 30 million and
appropriate them to the legal reserve. With the above-mentioned appropriation,
the legal reserve reaches the 20% of the capital stock and comprehensive
adjustment to capital stock.
In accordance with
Law No. 25,063, any dividends in cash or in kind, distributed in excess of the
accumulated taxable income at the moment of its distribution, shall be subject
to a 35% income tax withholding as a single and final payment.
Capital Stock
Reduction
As of the closing
date of these financial statements, only 3 million is pending as payment due to
the capital stock reduction performed in 2006 and approved by the Company’s
General Special Shareholders’ Meeting held on September 7, 2006 (see notes
3.1.j) and 11.3.).
6.
|
LIST
OF CONDITIONS AND THE TRANSFER CONTRACT. EXCLUSIVITY AND MAINTENANCE OF
THE LICENSE
|
The List of
Conditions (the “List”) and the Transfer Contract established certain
obligations of which the following are still in effect:
a)
|
The assets
contributed to the Company used in providing telecommunications services
may not be sold, assigned, transferred or encumbered in any
way.
|
|
b)
|
Certain
shareholders of the Company's parent company are required to retain a
specified interest in that company’s common capital stock. In addition,
Compañía Internacional de Telecomunicaciones S.A. (“COINTEL”), is required
to hold Series A shares which represent no less than 51% of Telefónica's
total capital stock.
|
|
c)
|
All or a
substantial part of the provision of the telephone service is to be
maintained, and the Company's main business and principal place of
business in Argentina may not be changed.
|
|
d)
|
The Company
must meet certain objectives related to the services provided. The most
important of these objectives are efficiency and service quality. In
addition, suppliers of data and added-value services are to be given equal
access to telephone lines.
|
|
In case of serious
noncompliance with the provisions in a) through d), the Company's license could
be revoked once the procedures set forth in the List have been completed. The
Company's license, however, would not be revoked, should the Company have
obtained prior Regulatory Authority approval for any of the situations described
above in a) and b).
In addition,
Presidential Decree No. 264/98 set forth both optional and mandatory operating
conditions with respect to the provision of basic telephone services. Such
mandatory conditions include mainly permitting other providers to interconnect
to the Company’s network (including voice and data transmission service) and the
installation of a minimum number of new lines.
Although the
effectiveness of Presidential Decree No. 264/98 was subject to the conclusion of
certain legal proceedings, the Company believes that it is unlikely that the
outcome of those proceedings would significantly slow the trend towards
increasing competition.
In connection with
the Company’s contractual obligations under the Memorandum of Understanding
2006, the CNC and the Executive Secretary’s Office of the UNIREN have stated
that, in compliance with current regulations, they have performed an analysis of
the status and degree of compliance by the Company with its obligations under
the Transfer Contract and the regulatory framework, and concluded through the
signing of the Memorandum of Understanding 2006 the Company has so far
acceptably met those obligations, with only minor noncompliance events resulting
in penalties. Remaining issues related to the Company’s operations are pending
resolution and were expected to be concluded prior to June 30, 2006. Despite the
scheduled date, the matters referred are still pending.
On March 23, 2007,
the S.C. issued Resolution No. 42 (“the Resolution”) recognizing the impact
sustained by the Company as a result of the increases and decreases in
employers´ social security contributions therein described. The Resolution
established a mechanism of reciprocal compensation for the balances in favor of
the Company and the Argentine government and instructed the CNC to proceed with
the applicable calculation and settlement. In September 2007, the CNC concluded
with the calculation of the corresponding amount and informed to the S.C. that
there is a net receivable in favor of the Company amounting to 58.7 million,
which, after the carried out compensations, amounts to 12 million as of the
closing date of these financial statements. Additionally, any remaining
receivable determined by the CNC in connection with the Resolution will be
recognized by the Company, as the corresponding mechanisms of reciprocal
compensation are verified.
In the Memorandum
of Understanding 2006, it was agreed that as of December 31, 2010, the Company
should achieve the goals established as long-term goals in Presidential Decree
No. 62/90 and in the
General Rules on
Basic Telephone Service Quality. In addition, goals are established as from 2005
that will be effective through the date mentioned above.
In the Memorandum
of Understanding 2006, and within the framework of the renegotiation of the
Company’s Transfer Contract with the government and within the 30 days
subsequent to the execution of the Protocol of Renegotiation by the PEN, the
Company, and the shareholders representing at least 98% of the capital stock,
would have to fully and expressly waive all rights that may potentially be
alleged as well as under all lawsuits filed or in progress, arising out of or
related to the events or measures resulting from the emergency situation
established in Law No. 25,561 in connection with the Transfer Contract and the
Company’s license. The waiver should not be interpreted as the Company’s waiver
to the rights that could apply to it based on possible future
circumstances.
The Company’s
Management believes that it has met all effective obligations.
7. COMMITMENTS
As of the closing
date of these financial statements, after the subscription of several
agreements, the Company maintains an arrangement with IBM for the outsourcing of
services related to Mainframe and Midrange equipment through 2011. The Company
committed to pay IBM a monthly charge throughout the term of the mentioned
contract in consideration for the base line services to be rendered under the
contract, and other charges for the use of additional resources. The payment
terms include decreasing monthly installments for approximately US$ 50 million
throughout the five-year contract term. The Mainframe includes the technological
renovation of the equipment used to provide the services.
7.2 Other
The Company signed
contracts for lease of satellites, real property and operation and maintenance
of submarine cables, which include approximately 164 million of minimum future
payments as of the closing date of these financial statements.
8. RATES
8.1 Rate
regulations
Presidential Decree
No. 764/00, issued to deregulate telecommunications services, sets forth that
providers may freely establish the tariffs and/or the prices of the services
supplied to objective categories of customers, which must be applied
non-discriminatorily. However, if there was no effective competition, as it is
the case with the services that generate a substantial part of the Company’s
income, historical providers shall respect the maximum tariffs laid down in the
General Tariff Structure. Below the values established in such Tariff Structure,
these providers may establish their tariffs freely. To determine the existence
of effective competition, the historical providers must demonstrate that other
providers of the same service have obtained 20% of the total revenue for such
service in the local area of the Basic Telephony Service involved. Additionally,
in the case of domestic and international long-distance services, effective
competition shall be deemed to exist when customers in the area are able to
choose through the dialing selection method among more than two service
providers offering more than one destination.
In 2000, the
Company filed a request to the effect that effective competition be officially
acknowledged in the Buenos Aires Multiple Area (“AMBA”). Pursuant to Resolution
S.C. No. 304/03, the S.C. established that the Company should readjust the
presentations submitted, supplying additional information. The Company has
complied with this request and no resolution has yet been made in the
case.
For the areas and
services for which effective competition has not been declared to exist, tariff
agreements established that the maximum tariff per pulse should be stated in
U.S. dollars in addition to a right for the Company to choose whether to adjust
such tariff from April 1 to October 1 of each year based on the variation in the
Consumer Price Index of the United States of America. However, the Public
Emergency and Foreign Exchange System Reform Law No. 25,561, dated January 6,
2002, provided that in the agreements executed by the Federal Administration
under public law regulations, including public works and utilities, indexation
clauses based on foreign countries’ price indexes and any other indexation
mechanisms are annulled. Law No. 25,561 also established that the prices and
tariffs resulting from such clauses are denominated in pesos at the AR$ 1 to US$
1 exchange rate. Furthermore, this law authorized the PEN to renegotiate the
above contracts taking into account the following criteria in relation to public
utilities: (a) the impact of tariffs on the competitiveness of the economy and
on distribution of income; (b) service quality and investment plans, when such
aspects are contemplated in the contracts; (c) the interest of users and access
to the services; (d) the security of the systems comprised; and (e) the
profitability of the companies.
The PEN, by means
of Decree No. 293/02, entrusted the Ministry of Economy with the renegotiation
of such agreements, including agreements that govern the provision of basic
(fixed) telephony services.
Presidential Decree
No. 311/03 created the UNIREN, which shall be headed by the Ministers of Economy
and Production, National Planning, Public Investment and Services. The UNIREN is
in charge of pursuing the renegotiation process.
Presidential Decree
No. 120/03 authorized the Argentine government to provide for interim tariff
reviews or adjustments as may be deemed necessary or convenient for the purpose
of ensuring the continued availability, safety and quality of services provided
to users under these contracts until the conclusion of the renegotiation
process.
Pursuant to several
laws that established annual extensions, the term to carry out the renegotiation
has been extended until December 31, 2009. The PEN shall be responsible for
submitting the renegotiation proposals to the Argentine Congress, which has to
communicate its decision within a period of 60 running days counted from the
date of reception of the proposal. In the event such period expires without the
Argentine Congress having reached a solution, the proposal is deemed accepted.
If the proposal is rejected, the PEN shall resume the process to renegotiate the
applicable agreement. Law No. 25,790 establishes that the decisions adopted by
the PEN in this renegotiation process shall not be limited to, or subject to,
the stipulations contained in the abovementioned regulatory frameworks currently
governing the concession or license agreements for the respective public
utilities. Renegotiation agreements may cover partial aspects of concession or
license agreements, formulas to adjust such agreements or temporarily amend them
and include the possibility of agreeing upon periodical reviews, as well as the
establishment of conditions that must be met by the quality parameters applied
to services. If there were temporary amendments, they should be taken into
consideration in the terms of the final agreements reached with concessionaires
or licensees. The legal provisions do not authorize public utilities contractors
or concessionaires to suspend or alter compliance with their
duties.
In accordance with
Resolution No. 72/03, in February 2003, the Ministry of Economy approved a
methodology to calculate and transfer to the Company’s customers the impact of
the tax on bank account transactions imposed by Law No. 25,413 paid by the
Company as from the date such resolution comes into force. Resolution No. 72/03
expressly refers to the Transfer Contract as the basis for the approval of such
method. Pursuant to Resolution No. 72/03, all taxes paid prior to that date are
included in the contractual renegotiation required by the Public Emergency
Law.
Under the legal
framework described, on May 20, 2004, the Company, Telecom Argentina S.A.
(“Telecom S.A.”) and the Argentine government signed a Memorandum of
Understanding (the “Memorandum of Understanding”) pursuant to which they agreed
to maintain the General Tariff Structure currently in force for the Basic
Telephony Service until December 31, 2004, without waiving the Company’s rights.
The parties also ratified their intent to reach a final contractual
renegotiation before December 31, 2004, which ultimately did not happen. In
addition, pursuant to the provisions of the Transfer Contract, they agreed that
any new tax or charge, or any variation in those currently in force, subject to
the control of Regulatory Authorities as established in sub-sections a), c) and
d) under paragraph 12.15 of the List of Conditions, shall be disclosed in the
bills issued to customers for services in the jurisdictions levied with the
respective tax or charge.
With the objective
of establishing mechanisms to enhance access to telecommunications services, in
the Memorandum of Understanding, an agreement was reached to implement the
measures necessary to develop the following services:
a)
|
Virtual
telephony cards for the beneficiaries of the head of household plan and
for pensioners who do not have a telephone line and who meet the
eligibility requirements set forth in the respective
resolution.
|
|
|
|
|
b)
|
Internet
access service in all its provincial centers at discount
prices.
|
|
c)
|
Addition of
the heads of household who own a telephone line and meet the respective
eligibility requirements for registration, to be registered for the
Program “Retirees, Pensioners and Low-Consumption
Households”.
|
|
As stated in this
Memorandum of Understanding, the S.C. issued Resolutions No. 261, No. 272 and
No. 73, dated November 12, 2004, November 23, 2004, and March 31, 2005,
respectively.
Resolution No. 261
approved the Company's promotional offer to provide dial-up Internet access
service as described in sub-paragraph b) at lower prices to customers in urban
areas located more than thirty (30) kilometers away from the Company's current
hubs for the supply of 0610 Internet access service, in order to increase the
number of areas that will have access to this service and based on discounts
granted on telephone rates.
Pursuant to
Resolution No. 272, the S.C. accepted the Company's proposal to implement the
"Virtual Telephony" service for the beneficiaries of the Head of Household Plan
mentioned in sub-paragraph a), consisting in the Value Added Voice Messaging
Service, with a related telephone number that allows users to receive and store
messages, available in the Buenos Aires Multiple Area, La Plata, Mar del Plata,
Mendoza, Bahía
Blanca and Neuquén.
Pursuant to
Resolution No. 73, dated March 31, 2005 and the clarifying Resolution No. 149
dated June 21, 2005, the Company and Telecom S.A. were instructed to include the
beneficiaries of the Head of Household Plan who already own a telephone line in
the customer category “Retirees, Pensioners and Low-Consumption Households” as
long as they meet the respective requirements for such category. For that
purpose, the Company is under the obligation to request the Federal Social
Security Authorities (Anses) to supply it with the National Register of
Beneficiaries of the head of household plan.
The deep changes in
the Argentine economic model experienced since early 2002 and the current
legislative framework (Public Emergency Law) are to be considered extraordinary
events that significantly altered the economic and financial equation and the
system applicable to the industry, therefore allowing the renegotiation of the
regulatory regime to adapt it to the new situation, in full compliance with the
principles established in the List of Conditions and the Transfer Contract, in
order to maintain a regular, continuous and efficient supply of telephony
services. The Transfer Contract contemplates the possibility of automatically
adjusting the tariffs in the case of extraordinary and unforeseen events thereby
defined or government actions or decisions that significantly affect the
Transfer Contract’s original financial equation. It also establishes a
compensation on behalf of the Argentine Government when there are extraordinary
events, including actions and decisions of the government such as a freezing of
tariffs or price controls, as well as the procedures to be followed to collect
such compensation.
The Company filed
the information required by the Argentine government and proposed to reestablish
the tariff regime stipulated in the Transfer Contract, which contemplates
peso-denominated tariffs whose intangibility is safeguarded by the application
of the monthly Consumer Price Index in Argentina or, if there were significant
differences between this index and the variation of the U.S. dollar, by the
result obtained from the application of a polynomial formula that considers 40%
of the monthly variation of the price of the U.S. dollar and 60% of the
variation of the monthly Consumer Price Index in Argentina, which had been
annulled with the enactment of the Convertibility Law and the issuance of
Presidential Decree No. 2,585/91. The Company proposed different alternatives to
achieve such objective, especially to handle the transition from current tariffs
to those resulting from the application of the Transfer Contract.
In the Memorandum
of Understanding 2006 mentioned in note 2.3.a), the parties agreed to comply
with and maintain the legal conditions provided in the Transfer Contract and
regulations effective to date. Thirty days after the public hearing to discuss
the Memorandum of Understanding 2006, which took place on April 28, 2006, both
the Company and its shareholders should suspend for 210 working days all the
claims, remedies, and lawsuits filed or in progress before administrative and
arbitral tribunals or any court of law, in Argentina or abroad, based on or
related to the events occurred or measures taken as a result of the emergency
situation under Law No. 25,561 regarding the Company’s license and Transfer
Contract. In this sense, the Company and its shareholders filed in the time
limits established, the suspension requested mentioned in the Memorandum of
Understanding 2006 and then subsequent extensions which latest maturity date was
on April 6, 2009. As of the expiration date, the Company, its shareholders and
the Argentine government expressed their intention to negotiate the terms of the
next steps to be followed. In that sense, Telefónica S.A. and the Argentine
Government requested, in mutual agreement, the Court of the International Centre
for Settlement of Investment Disputes ("CIADI") to terminate the arbitration
proceedings initiated by Telefónica S.A., having the Court ruling so on
September 24, 2009. The termination of the arbitration proceedings does not
imply that either Telefónica S.A. or the Argentine Government waive any of their
rights.
The Memorandum of
Understanding 2006 provides that, in order to ensure the necessary
foreseeability in the telecommunications sector and considering the
telecommunications expertise and experience contributed by sector companies, the
PEN committed its efforts to establishing an adequate and consistent regulatory
framework which, based on the legal and technical aspects of the industry,
supplements and strengthens the regulations applicable to the
sector.
In the opinion of
the Company’s Management and its legal advisors, under the general principles of
administrative law applicable to the List of Conditions and the Transfer
Contract, the future rates should be set at levels sufficient to cover the cost
of the service in order to preserve regular, uninterrupted and efficient
provision of the public telephony utility service. It is possible that, over
time, such rates scheme may not maintain the rate values in U.S. dollars or in
constant pesos in relation to any future increase in the general price level. If
a future regulatory framework did not provide for the rates to change at a pace
allowing balancing of the economic and financial equation that both the List of
Conditions and the Transfer Contract intended to preserve, such rate schedule
could have an adverse impact on the Company’s financial position and future
results. As of the date of issuance of these financial statements, the Company’s
Management could not predict the possible outcome of the renegotiation pursuant
to Public Emergency Law or the rates system that will apply in future or when it
will be implemented.
8.2 Price
cap
Under the tariff
regulation mechanism in effect known as Price Cap, to which the Company is
subject, tariff discounts have been applied based on a formula made up by the
U.S. Consumer Price Index and an efficiency factor. On October 4, 2001, Court
Room IV of the Federal Appellate Court on Administrative
Contentious Matters
of the City of Buenos Aires, in relation to the complaint filed by Consumidores
Libres Cooperativa Limitada de Provisión de Servicios Comunitarios
("Consumidores Libres") mentioned in note 9.e), awarded a precautionary measure
ordering the federal government, the Company and Telecom S.A. "to refrain from
applying the corrections set forth in Section 2 of the agreements approved by
Presidential Decree No. 2,585/91 until final judgment is rendered in the case…",
which meant that the rates could not be adjusted by the U.S. Consumer Price
Index (see note 9.e).
The Company,
Telecom S.A. and the S.C. entered into agreements for the application of the
Price Cap for the 2000-2001, 2001-2002 and 2002-2003 periods. The price cap for
the 2000-2001 period was established at 6.75%, of which 6% was allocated to rate
reductions attributable to discount plans that were in effect in 2000 and the
non-application of the semiannual adjustments to the pulse value of that year,
among other items. The remaining 0.75% was to be applied as defined by the
licensees. The price cap for the 2001-2002 period was established at 5.6%, and
would be allocated to the non-application of the semiannual adjustments to the
pulse value of 2001, plus the balance of the non-computation of the pulse value
not applied in the price cap for the previous year. To date, the remaining
amount has not been allocated to the services contemplated in the agreement. In
connection with the price cap for the 2002-2003 period, it was established in an
efficiency factor which could not exceed 5%, but its value was not fixed. The
abovementioned agreements require the approval of the Ministries of Economy and
Production and Federal Planning, Public Investment and Services, which are still
pending as of the date of issuance of these financial statements. Moreover,
neither the effect of the reduction in rates previously implemented as compared
to the rate reduction adjustments established by the S.C. nor the rate
differences pending application under the referred agreements, have been
established.
In September 2007,
the CNC, through its Resolution No. 433/07, notified the Company about the
conclusion of its audit on the rate reduction issued by Resolution No. 2925/99
“Price Cap 99”. In the above-mentioned resolution, the CNC stated that the
Company holds an amount of 4.9 million to be offset, which has to be applied as
a higher rate reduction to that established for the Price Cap 2000. The Company
and its legal advisors consider that the abovementioned balance will be fully
offset with the amount to be determined for the Price Cap 2000, without having
effect on the financial position and results of operations of the Company as of
the closing date of these financial statements.
In the opinion of
the Company’s Management and its legal counsel, the resolution of these issues
related to the price cap might exclusively affect the maximum tariffs for future
services that the Company is authorized to collect its customers for services,
areas or customers in which effective competition has not been declared. As of
the closing date of these financial statements, these maximum tariffs are the
result of the application to the tariffs in force as of November 7, 2000, of the
discounts resulting from the implementation of the price cap for period 2000 -
2001 and to the advanced decreases corresponding to the period 2001- 2002, as
established in the abovementioned agreements.
Under the price cap
mechanism currently in effect, the rate reduction percentage and the services to
which such reductions will eventually apply depend on the final approval of the
above rate agreements, and on the outcome of the legal proceedings commenced by
Consumidores Libres regarding the effective rate system.
Based on current
rate regulation mechanisms, and considering the Company’s defense against the
above legal proceedings, in the opinion of the Company’s Management and its
legal counsel, the outcome of these issues will not have a negative impact upon
the Company’s financial position or a significant adverse effect on its results
of operations.
9. LAWSUITS
AND CLAIMS
Contingencies
The Company is
facing various proceedings and claims in the areas of labor, tax, regulatory
compliance and other matters, all of which arise in the ordinary course of
business. Every situation of this type implies certain degree of uncertainty,
and the outcome of individual matters is not predictable with certainty. If
information available prior to the issuance of the financial statements,
considering the opinion of the Company’s legal counsel, indicates that it is
probable that a liability had been incurred as of the date of these financial
statements, and the amount of the loss, or the range of probable loss, including
the corresponding litigation fees, can be reasonably estimated, then such loss
is accrued and charged to expenses and accrued in the reserve for
contingencies.
In July 2007, the
Company received an information request related to a judicial process in which
it is not a party, and among other required books and documentation, had to
submit the Company's Inventory and Financial Statements Book.
As of the closing
date of these financial statements, the Company’s total amount recorded as
reserves for contingencies is 393 million.
The breakdown of
the reserve for contingencies is as follows:
Labor
contingencies:
The reserve for
contingencies related to labor issues amounts to 163 million and 182 million as
of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The closing balance
of the reserve as of the closing date of these financial statements, is mainly
comprised of:
i) aggregate
assessment of probable losses of 8 million resulting from claims brought by
employees, related to salary differences, taking into account certain judgments
at beginning of 2005 of Courts of Appeals that were adverse to the
Company.
ii) claims
for alleged rights provided in the labor law and related costs which amount to
39 million. The Company intends to defend its rights in whichever instances are
necessary.
iii)
other matters
assessed as probable to incur losses, relate to:
·
|
Joint and
several liability with third
parties
|
·
|
Other
severance payments
|
·
|
Claims from
ENTel's former employees
|
Tax
contingencies:
The reserve for
contingencies related to tax matters assessed as probable amounted to 113
million and 92 million as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively.
These tax issues
are mainly related to:
·
|
National and
Provincial taxes
|
Civil, commercial and other
contingencies
The reserve for
contingencies related to civil, commercial, administrative, regulatory
compliance and other matters that are expected to have a negative outcome for
the Company as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, amounts to 117
million, as of each date. These other matters relate to:
·
|
Regulatory
compliance claims
|
·
|
Claims for
account reporting
|
|
a)
|
Labor
lawsuits attributable to ENTel and
account
reporting
|
|
The Transfer
Contract provides that ENTel and not the Company is liable for all the
amounts owed in connection with claims based upon ENTel's contractual and
statutory obligations to former ENTel employees, whether or not such
claims were made prior to the Transfer Date if the events giving rise to
such claims occurred prior to the Transfer Date. However, using a theory
of successor enterprise liability that they assert is based upon generally
applicable Argentine labor law, certain former employees of ENTel have
brought claims against the Company, arguing that neither the Transfer
Contract nor any act of the PEN can be raised as a defense to the
Company's joint and several liability under allegedly applicable labor
laws.
|
|
|
In an attempt
to clarify the issue of successor liability for labor claims, Presidential
Decree No. 1,803/92 was issued. It states that various articles of the
Work Contract Law of Argentina (the “Articles”), which are the basis for
the foregoing claims of joint and several liability, would not be
applicable to privatizations completed or to be completed under the State
Reform Law. Although the issuance of Presidential Decree No. 1,803/92
should have been seen as favorable to the Company, it did not bring about
a final solution to the above claims. In effect, in deciding a case
brought before it, the Supreme Court of Justice (“CSJN”) upheld the
provisions of the law and declared the Decree
inapplicable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of the
closing date of these financial statements, the claims filed against the
Company including accrued interest and expenses totaled approximately 19
million (in original currency). However, depending on the possible outcome
of such legal actions ENTel has agreed in the Transfer Contract to
indemnify the Company in respect of such claims and the Argentine
|
|
government has
agreed to be jointly and severally liable with ENTel in respect of such
indemnity obligations and has therefore authorized the Company to debit an
account of the government at Banco Nación Argentina for any amount payable by
the Company. Under the Debt Consolidation Law, ENTel and the Argentine
government may discharge their above described indemnity obligations by the
issuance to the Company of 16-year bonds. As of the closing date of these
financial statements, the Company has paid approximately 15 million (in original
currency) in cash for the concluded claims. The Company filed a claim for
indemnification and reimbursement in connection with this matter. In addition,
an amount of 10 million paid by the Company in this regard was included and
verified in an account reporting lawsuit between the Company and ENTel. In
connection with the above-mentioned lawsuit, on May 13, 2009, the Company was
notified of a final judgment whereby the complaint filed by ENTel had been
sustained, including expenses, and consequently, the Company was ordered to duly
perform the account reporting. The Company appealed such judgment, while the
Argentine Government
filed a petition
for clarification, with an appeal in the alternative, against that judgment. On
August 5, 2009, the petition for clarification filed by the plaintiff was
dismissed, and the claims filed by the Company and the Argentine Government were
allowed, pending as of the date of issuance of these financial statements the
submission to the Court of Appeals. In the opinion of the Company’s Management
and its legal advisors, Telefonica has strong arguments for the court to admit
the deductions proposed by the Company related to the amounts paid for labor
lawsuits against the Company and ENTel, by application of the joint and several
liability principle, though borne by ENTel.
Court decisions
have followed the precedent laid down by the CSJN in the area of joint liability
in labor matters mentioned in the second paragraph. Both the Company and its
legal counsel believe that such criterion will apply to pending cases.
Notwithstanding this and the instruments that may be used by the Argentine
government to reimburse the amounts that would be paid, given the obligation
incurred by the Argentine government in the List of Conditions and in the
Transfer Contract, on the one hand, and on the basis of the opinion of the
Company’s legal counsel regarding the possible amount for which existing claims
may be resolved, on the other, in the opinion of the Company’s Management and
its legal counsel the final outcome of the issue should not have a material
impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial
position.
The Company along
with the Argentine government, has been notified of approximately 758 lawsuits,
which include 8,041 plaintiffs in the aggregate, claiming an amount of money to
redress the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to not having received the
profit-sharing bonds (“BPG”) at the time ENTel was privatized, basing their
claim on State Reform Law No. 23,696 enacted in August 1989.
Despite the
Company’s rejection and several judgments from original and appellate
jurisdictions in its favor, on August 12, 2008 in “GENTINI, Jorge vs. Argentine
Government”, the CSJN, by a majority vote, provided that Presidential Decree No.
395/92, which recognized that the Company was under no obligation to issue the
profit-sharing bonds as established by Law No. 23,696, was unconstitutional, and
declared the legitimacy of the claim for damages filed by the 20 plaintiffs in
this lawsuit.
The CSJN judgment
provided that the judges from original jurisdiction, in this case, the National
Appellate Court with Labor Jurisdiction, must decide the nature and the extent
of the responsibility attributable to each one of the defendants, i.e., the
Argentine government and the Company. On April 27, 2009, the Company was
notified of the Appellate Court on Labor Jurisdiction ruling, whereby the
Company has been ordered, jointly and severally with the Argentine government,
to pay to the plaintiffs the amounts resulting from the calculations to be
performed by an accounting expert (plus interest and legal costs) computing 0.5%
of the Company’s income as of each fiscal year. Such amount must be distributed
considering each ownership interest in conformity with the guidelines laid down
in the respective Employee Stock Ownership Program. In the opinion of the
Company’s legal advisors, it is the Argentine government who should be
attributed such responsibility.
The development of
the claims filed, raises the uncertainties inherent to any legal proceeding. In
particular, there are specific issues, additionally to those mentioned in the
preceding paragraph, which must be finally resolved in these proceedings related
to the premises that should be taken into consideration to quantify any
potential amount to be paid, for instance: (i) the profit-sharing percentage:
although in this case the claim of the majority of the plaintiffs is about 2% of
net income, according to the background information related to other privatized
companies and the recently ruling of the Gentini case, this percentage ranges
from 0.25% to 0.50%, (ii) if the earnings to be considered are net or before
tax, (iii) the periods in force for the right to access to the BPG, (iv) the
parties who are entitled to file the claim and (v) the effects on the BPG of the
repurchase of the Company’s Class C shares in 1998. Considering the information
available as of the date of issuance of these financial statements and the
different scenarios arising from the
set of premises
abovementioned, the maximum amount of risk for this contingency might represent
approximately 1.2% of the Company’s total assets as of the closing date of these
financial statements, a scenario that the Company’s Management and its legal
advisors consider is not probable. The Company has registered a reserve for
contingencies based on its estimation of the probable amount, equivalent to 20%
of the maximum amount.
Nevertheless, the
Company considers that it has no responsibility for not issuing the BPG, which
is the reason why the Company will bring a legal action against the Argentine
government in order to obtain the reimbursement of any amount that the Company
might be required to pay for these claims.
Based on the
information and the elements available as of the date of issuance of these
financial statements and, considering the risk inherent in any legal proceeding,
according to the opinion of the Company and its legal advisors, the probability
that the outcome of these proceedings will have a significant negative effect on
the results of the Company’s operations or its financial position is
remote.
|
c)
|
Resolution
S.C. N° 42/07
|
On March 23, 2007,
the Company was notified of S.C.’s Resolution No. 42/07. This resolution
establishes a mechanism of reciprocal compensation for the balances in favor of
the Company and the Argentine Government accrued as a result of certain
decreases and increases in the employers’ social security contributions paid by
the Company. For calculation purposes, the Resolution includes a liability
arising from a communication sent by the CNC requesting to deposit the amount
equivalent to the savings obtained, plus interest, by the Company and Telefónica
Larga Distancia de Argentina S.A., a company currently merged with and into
Telefónica, as reductions in social security contributions approved by
Presidential Decree No. 1,520/98 and supplementary regulations. The S.C. had
instructed the CNC to settle the amounts involved. In September 2007, the
Company was notified of the determination issued by the CNC, which resulted in a
net receivable in favor of the Company of 58.7 million, after offsetting the
amount proceeding from the savings obtained from the reduced contributions plus
its interest. According to Resolution No. 42 of the S.C., if a receivable
balance remained in favor of the Company after the debt compensation, such
balance could be compensated with certain liabilities related to the services
object of the Company’s licenses.
On December 3,
2007, the Company requested the final settlement of the amount determined by
Resolution No. 4,269/99 under the framework of the mechanism set forth by
Resolution No. 42/07, which established the S.C.’s final determination of the
impact of the tariff restructuring as an excess in revenues of 18 million, in
currency units. On December 6, 2007, the S.C. accepted the appeals resignations
and sent the files to the CNC in order to include the abovementioned amounts
into the compensation established by Resolution No. 42/07 of the
S.C.
Additionally, the
Company requested the S.C. to offset the fines imposed by the CNC with the
remaining receivable established by the abovementioned Resolution, requesting
that the S.C. compensate such fines for an amount of 1 million. According to the
compensation mechanism established by Resolution No. 42, the Company has
recognized the compensation for an amount of 28.7 million, which represents the
present value of the probable offsetting amount related to such
fines.
As of the closing
date of these financial statements, after the carried out compensations, the net
credit balance in favor of the Company amounts to 12 million.
As of the date of
issuance of these financial statements, the Company has not been notified of any
additional resolution from the S.C. in relation to the issues described in this
note. The Company has disclosed the related liabilities (which represents the
present value of the probable amount related to the abovementioned fines) net of
the offsettable receivable. The Company will recognize any remaining receivable
in connection with the Resolution, as the related mechanisms of reciprocal
compensation are verified.
In December 2000,
the Company was served with an ex officio assessment imposed by Argentine Tax
Authorities in relation to income tax for the fiscal years 1994 through 1999.
Such adjustment was due to differences in the criterion used to calculate the
depreciation of fiber optic cables. Whereas the Company applies a useful life of
15 years, the Argentine Tax Authorities proceeded to the assessment based on a
useful life of 20 years. Having analyzed the issue, the Company and its legal
counsel appealed the assessment imposed by the Federal Tax Authorities with the
Argentine Administrative Tax Court based on the Company's opinion that there are
strong arguments against the Tax Authorities' assessment.
|
However, in
November 2004 the Argentine Administrative Tax Court entered a judgment
against the Company forcing it to amend the tax returns referred to above.
Additionally, the judgment repealed the penalties imposed by Tax
Authorities on the grounds that there were admissible elements in support
of the figure of excusable error. Given that judgment, the Company has
been compelled to pay an amount of 6 million plus 17 million as
compensatory interest in December 2004 which have been charged as of that
date to the statement of operations as definitive payment. In the
Company’s opinion this matter will not have any additional effects beyond
these payments.
|
|
|
Notwithstanding
the above paragraph, and although the final resolution is subject to the
contingencies inherent in any pending court judgment, the Company and its
legal counsel believe that there are legal grounds for a successful appeal
of the judgment entered against the Company and they have presented an
appeal to have this judgment reviewed by the National Court of Appeals in
Administrative Contentious Matters. As of the date of issuance of these
financial statements, the Court has not ruled on this
matter.
|
|
e)
|
Others
|
|
|
Consumidores
Libres initiated a legal action against the Company, Telecom S.A.,
Telintar Argentina S.A. (“Telintar S.A.”) and the Argentine Government.
The object of this action is to declare the nullity, unlawfulness and
unconstitutionality of all the standards and rate agreements issued since
the Transfer Contract, Consumidores Libres object being to have the rates
of the basic telephone service reduced and the amount supposedly collected
in excess refunded, limiting them in such a way that the Licensees’ rate
of return should not exceed 16% per annum on the fixed assets as
determined in point 12.3.2 of the List of Conditions approved by
Presidential Decree No. 62/90. Also, other points of the Company’s
contracting policy have been called into question.
|
|
|
After
analyzing the claim, the Company’s legal counsel answered it, petitioning
that it should be dismissed on the grounds that it fails to state a claim
with a basis in law. The court of original jurisdiction ruled in the
Company’s favor, but this resolution was revoked by the Court of Appeals
which resolved that the claim should not be dismissed but substantiated at
the court of original jurisdiction. None of these courts have yet ruled on
the substance of the claim. Through
its legal
counsel, the Company filed an appeal with the CSJN against the Court of
Appeal’s resolution, which was denied. The Company subsequently filed an
appeal of such denial with the CSJN and has also been
rejected.
|
|
In this scenario,
on October 4, 2001, Court Room IV of the Federal Appellate Court on
Administrative Contentious Matters of the City of Buenos Aires awarded a
precautionary measure requested by the plaintiff ordering the Argentine
Government, the Company and Telecom S.A. "to refrain from applying the
corrections set forth in Section 2 of the Agreements approved by Presidential
Decree No. 2,585/91 until final judgment is rendered in the case", which meant
that the rates could not be adjusted by the U.S. Consumer Price
Index.
The Company
appealed such decision before the CSJN rejecting the arguments stated therein,
which has been adversely determined as of the date of issuance of these
financial statements.
In addition, when
filing the complaint, the plaintiff requested
“no further application”
of
the disputed adjustment indexes; meaning that, contrary to its current
intentions, the plaintiff only requested the suspension of a possible and future
“automatic increase.” On March 29, 2007, the Company was notified of a
resolution issued by the judge of original jurisdiction, rejecting the
plaintiff’s petition for being apparently unacceptable, and ordering the
plaintiff to pay legal costs. The abovementioned decision was confirmed by the
Court of Appeals by resolution notified to the Company dated July 1,
2009.
On June 22, 2007,
the court of original jurisdiction sustained the termination of the proceedings,
which was appealed by the plaintiff. On August 12, 2009, the Company was
notified of the rule of Court Room IV of the Appellate Court on Administrative
Contentious Matters, repealing the resolution of the judge of original
jurisdiction.
In the opinion of
the Company’s Management and its legal counsel, it is unlikely and remote that
the resolution of this issue could have a negative effect on the results of the
Company’s operations or its financial position.
10.
|
FINANCING
|
|
|
10.1
|
WORKING
CAPITAL AND OTHER BANK AND FINANCIAL LONG-TERM
PAYABLES
|
As of September 30,
2009, the Company's current assets are lower than its current liabilities by 143
million. The Company’s general financing policy is to cover future fund needs to
continue its investment plan and repay short and long-term debt mainly with
funds generated by the operations plus bank loans and/or access to capital
markets and ultimately applying for financing from the Company's indirect parent
company.
In the past, the
Company managed to gradually reduce its financial indebtedness through a
combination of cancellations at maturity, issuance of negotiable obligations,
and short and long-term refinancings. The Company expects to arrange for
additional placements in the future. Those placements, in conjunction with
internally-generated cash flows and possible refinancing options and/or other
financing alternatives that the Company may consider will, in the opinion of the
Company’s Management, enable the Company to settle or successfully refinance the
remaining balance of its indebtedness.
As of the closing
date of these financial statements, the Company held long-term funds from major
financial institutions in an amount equivalent to 68 million with maturity
between November 2010 and May 2017 accruing a nominal annual interest rate
ranging from 1.75% to 2.30%. These funds have been borrowed under terms and
conditions customary in this kind of transaction, which generally refer to the
commitment not to encumber or grant security interests on its assets or on
present or future revenues, other than certain permitted encumbrances or unless
certain predetermined conditions are met.
10.2. NEGOTIABLE
OBLIGATIONS
As of the closing
date of these financial statements, there were three negotiable obligations
series outstanding:
Issuance
Month/Year
|
|
Face
Value
as of
September 30, 2009
(in
millions)
|
|
|
Term
(in
years)
|
|
|
Maturity Month/Year
|
|
|
Rate per
annum
(%)
|
|
|
Use of
proceeds
|
|
|
08/03
|
|
|
US$195.5
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
11/2010
|
|
|
|
9.125
|
|
|
|
a
)
|
|
|
08/03
|
|
|
US$0.03
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
08/2011
|
|
|
|
8.85
|
|
|
|
a
)
|
|
|
08/03
|
|
|
US$134.6
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
08/2011
|
|
|
|
8.85
|
|
|
|
a
)
|
|
a)
|
Refinancing
of liabilities.
|
On September 24,
2009, the Company issued two purchase offers in cash for its outstanding
negotiable obligations, one in pesos and the other one in U.S. dollars, for a
total maximum purchasing price of US$ 75 million and of 200 million pesos. On
September 25, 2009, the Company notified the CNV the abovementioned purchase
offers. The maturity of the offers was on October 22, 2009.
As of the date of
issuance of these financial statements, the operation ended as planned in the
abovementioned purchase offer, having the Company disbursed a total amount of
US$ 67.9 million and 18.7 million pesos in order to repurchase the outstanding
negotiable obligations as of the closing date of the period, corresponding
to:
- Convertible
negotiable obligations at 8.850% maturing in August 2011 for a face value of US$
28,576 (corresponding to 100% of the series’ outstanding amount).
- Negotiable
obligations at 9.125% maturing November 2010 for a face value of US$ 48.2
million.
-
Negotiable obligations at 8.850% maturing August 2011 for a face value of U$S
17.9 million.
Out of the
disbursed amount, US$ 4.2 million correspond to the premium paid by the Company,
which was registered under the caption “Interest and financial charges” in the
statement of operations at the end of the period.
The prospectus
related to the issuance of these negotiable obligations describes the issuance
in detail. The main stipulations concern: a) commitment of the Company not to
create liens, except certain permitted liens, over its present or future assets
or revenues, unless the Company's commitments under the negotiable obligations
meet certain requirements; b) conditions for the early redemption of the
issuance and c) events of default whereby the note holders could accelerate the
maturity dates, such causes being, among others, failure to pay on the
securities, default on other debts in amounts equal to or exceeding US$ 20
million, attachments which in the aggregate exceed US$ 10 million,
etc.
As of the date of
issuance of these financial statements, in the opinion of the Company’s
Management, the Company has met all the obligations arising from the agreements
signed in connection with these issuances.
11. PARENT
COMPANY AND RELATED COMPANIES
11.1. COINTEL
COINTEL is the
controlling shareholder of the Company. COINTEL holds 52.7% of the Company’s
capital stock (Class A shares 51.5% and Class B shares 1.2%) and has the votes
required to prevail in shareholders’ meetings.
Given that on
December 15, 2000, TSA acquired the majority interest of the capital stock of
COINTEL, TSA indirectly controls 98% of the voting rights of the total
outstanding shares of the Company. See note 5.
In 1997, some of
the common shareholders of COINTEL, who, as of the date of the signed agreement,
owned an 83.36% equity interest in COINTEL executed an agreement to regulate
certain corporate decisions such as the dividend policy or preferential rights
held by some of them (members of the consortium, as defined in the Transfer
Contract, and its affiliates) to provide goods and services under terms equal or
more favorable than those offered by third parties. The Company made certain
transactions with COINTEL’s shareholders and companies related thereto, that
included the services rendered by TSA (the “Operator”) and those rendered by
third parties related to the shareholders of COINTEL (see note
11.3.).
11.2. MANAGEMENT
AGREEMENT AND BRAND LICENSE
Management
agreement
The List of
Conditions for the privatization of ENTel provided that one of the members of
the consortium taking part in the privatization had to be an experienced
telecommunications operator, which was required to enter into a management
agreement with the surviving companies of ENTel establishing a fee for the
services provided by the operator.
As a result of the
requirements of the List of Conditions, the Company entered into a management
agreement with TSA, whereby the latter was the "Operator" (“the Management
Agreement”). Under the Management Agreement, TSA was responsible for managing
the Company’s business and for providing services, expertise and know-how with
respect to the Company's entire range of activities. Also, the Management
Agreement provided TSA with management powers relating to the Company's
day-to-day operations. TSA's responsibilities included: (i) developing general
policies; (ii) designing personnel and compensation structures; (iii) supplying
necessary personnel; (iv) selecting appropriate expertise and technology; and
(v) developing detailed action plans and budgets for the Company.
As of the date of
signing the Management Agreement, TSA held a 6% indirect equity interest in the
Company.
The Management
Agreement established that the management fee paid to the Operator, TSA, shall
amount to 9% of the Company’s “gross margin” defined as (+) Net income (+)
amortizations (+) financial expenses (+) income tax, and (+) the management fee
itself.
In accordance with
the List of Conditions, the term of the Company’s Management Agreement coincided
with the exclusivity period, i.e. until October 10, 1999. As provided for in the
Management Agreement, if the Company's exclusivity period were extended, the
contract would continue to be in effect with a management fee of up to 9% of the
“gross margin” through April 30, 2003 and that; if it was extended beyond that
date, the management fee percentage would be reduced to a negotiated amount
ranging between 1.5% and 5% of the “gross margin”.
On July 30, 2003,
the Company and TSA had entered into a Supplement to the Management Agreement
stipulating that the management fee amounted to 4% of the gross margin. The
expiration of the Management Agreement took place on April 30,
2008.
Based on the above
and taking into account that at the date of signing the Management Agreement TSA
held a 6% indirect equity interest in the Company, management believes that the
fee agreed between the Company and TSA was not less favorable than those that
would have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties.
Brand
License
At the Board
meeting held on July 24, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a brand
license agreement, whereby TSA grants the Company with a license to use various
of its brands in Argentina (including the Telefónica brand). This agreement is
effective from May 1, 2008, through December 31, 2011, and may be renewed by any
of the parties for three-year periods. In consideration thereof, in the event
that the prior-fiscal-year operating cash flow was positive, the Company will
pay a fee calculated as 0.75% of the Company’s revenues for fiscal 2008, 1% of
the Company’s revenues for fiscal 2009, 1.3% of the Company’s revenues for
fiscal 2010 and 1.6% of the Company’s revenues for fiscal 2011, excluding from
the Company’s revenues those deriving from transactions with companies of the
Telefónica Group, the sale of fixed assets, financial investments and earnings
from claims and litigation.
In the event that
the preceding fiscal year showed a negative operating cash flow, the Company
shall pay an annual fee calculated based on the disbursements made by TSA
regarding the industrial property portfolio licensed to the Company during the
applicable license year.
The Board of
Directors’ approval of this agreement was given only after the Company’s Audit
Committee, had previously considered that the agreement was reasonably framed
within regular market conditions, in compliance with the requirements of Decree
No. 677/01.
11.3. OUTSTANDING
BALANCES AND TRANSACTIONS WITH PARENT COMPANY, AND RELATED
COMPANIES
On July 24, 2008,
the Company’s Board of Directors approved the execution of an agreement with
Telfisa Global BV (“Telfisa”), a financial company owned by TSA, to place a
maximum amount up to US$ 90 million. Such funds accrue interest at an annual
rate determined as the one-month LIBOR rate plus four basis points.
During the years
2007 to 2009, TMA S.A. acquired American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”) each one
representative of 40 Class B shares of the Company and Class B shares belonging
mainly to companies in Telefónica Group. After these purchases, which transfers
were completed on May 29, 2009, TMA holds 29.56% of the Company’s capital
stock.
During the
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the following transactions
were made with the indirect controlling shareholder of the Company and related
companies.
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income / (Expense)
|
|
Management
Fee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telefónica
S.A. - Sucursal Argentina
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brand
license
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSA
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (expense)
from goods and services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TMA
S.A.
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
TDA S.A.
(1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Atento
Argentina S.A. (“Atento”)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Telefónica
Ingeniería de Seguridad S.A. (“TIS S.A.”)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Telefónica
International Wholesale Services Argentina S.A. (“TIWS
Argentina”)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
Telefónica
International Wholesale Services S.L. (“TIWS España”)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Telcel
Venezuela (“Telcel”)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
C.P.T.
Telefónica del Perú (“CPT”)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Televisión
Federal S.A. – TELEFE
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Telecomunicaciones
de San Pablo S.A. (“Telesp”)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Telefónica
Gestión de Servicios Compartidos S.A. (“T-Gestiona”)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Terra
Networks Argentina S.A. (“Terra”)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Telefónica
Móviles Uruguay S.A.
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Telefónica
International S.A. (“TISA”)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
TSA
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
CTC Mundo
S.A. (“CTC”)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Centros de
Contacto Salta S.A.
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Telefonica
Data USA Inc.
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Colombia
Telecomunicaciones S.A.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Tevefe
Comercialización S.A.
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Microcentro
de Contactos S.A.
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
Net income on
financial charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telfisa
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
TMA
S.A.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of other
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TIS
S.A.
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
TDA S.A.
(1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
(1)
|
Includes
transactions prior to the date of acquisition. See notes 18. and
2.5.
|
The Company
payables to/receivables from TSA and other COINTEL’s shareholders and related
companies, as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are:
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telfisa
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
Total
Current investments
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CTC
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Telcel
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
T-Gestiona
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Telefónica
International Wholesale Services América S.A. (“TIWS
América”)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Televisión
Federal S.A. – TELEFE
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Telefónica
Móviles Uruguay S.A.
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Telefónica
Larga Distancia de Puerto Rico, Inc.
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Córdoba
Gestiones y Contactos S.A.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Atento
Colombia S.A.
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
CPT
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Atento
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Microcentro
de Contactos S.A
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Mar del Plata
Gestiones y Contactos S.A.
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Telefonica
Data USA, Inc.
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
Trade receivables
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telefónica
Media Argentina S.A.
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
TIWS
América
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Telefónica
International Wholesale Services Brasil
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Telefónica
International Wholesale Services Perú S.A.C.
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
TISA
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Telefónica
S.A. – Sucursal Argentina
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
TMA
S.A.
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Atento
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
Other receivables
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telefónica
S.A. – Sucursal Argentina (1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
CTC
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
TIWS
Argentina
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
TIWS
América
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
TIWS
España
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Telefónica
Servicios Audiovisuales
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
TIS
S.A.
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Telefónica
Investigación y Desarrollo S.A.
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Telesp
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
TMA
S.A.
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Terra
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Telefónica
Data USA, Inc.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Telefónica
Datacorp S.A.
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
TSA
(2)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Centros de
Contacto Salta S.A.
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Colombia
Telecomunicaciones S.A.
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
TISA
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
Trade payables
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
Other
payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSA
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Telefónica
International Holding B.V. (3)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Total
Other payables
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
(1) Related to
liabilities from management fee. See note 11.2.
(2) In 2009
and 2008, includes 26 million and 24 million, respectively, related to
brand license. See note 11.2.
(3) See note
5.
|
12.
|
RULES
GOVERNING THE PROVISION OF BASIC TELEPHONE AND OTHER
SERVICES
|
Since March 1992
and in compliance with its specific functions, the CNC, formerly known as
National Telecommunications Commission (“CNT”), and the S.C. have regulated
certain aspects related to the basic and international telephone services such
as the procedure to make claims, contracting, billing and service quality, some
of which have been subject to of appeals by the Company.
In the context of
the transition to competition in telecommunications, the PEN issued the
Presidential Decree No. 764/00 which repealed, among others, Resolutions Nos.
18,971/99 and 16,200/99 and approved the Universal Service Regulations to
promote the access to telecommunications services by customers either located in
high-cost access or maintenance areas, or with physical limitations or special
social needs. Such regulation effective from January 1, 2001, establishes that
the deficit for the provision of these services by the Company will be afforded
by “Universal Service Fund”, to be financed by all telecommunications providers
(including the Company) through the payment of 1% of total revenues for
telecommunications services net of any applicable tax and automatic deductions
provided by the related regulation.
On June 8, 2007,
and July 26, 2007, respectively, the S.C. issued Resolutions No. 80 and No. 127,
in which certain conditions were imposed on providers of telecommunication
services as from July 2007 and until the Universal Service Trust Fund created by
Decree No. 764/00 is established. These resolutions set forth that providers of
telecommunications services must each open a bank account, at Banco de la Nación
Argentina, in which to deposit, on a monthly basis, the amounts pertaining to
their duties, until the Universal Service Trust Fund is
established.
In addition, these
resolutions set forth that each provider shall inform to the CNC, on a monthly
basis, of the amounts deposited in its account at Banco de la Nación Argentina,
and must submit an affidavit, identifying the amounts payable as investment
contributions and, if applicable, any amounts spent by the provider in the
implementation of programs which are to be deducted from the contribution to be
paid. Resolution No. 2713/2007 of the CNC put into effect the affidavit model,
established procedures regarding the determination of the calculation basis
applicable to the investment contribution and instructed that any amounts to be
offset in connection with performance of the Universal Service Program “will be
subject to the final determination of the activities undertaken by the
Commission created by Section 10 of Resolution No. 80 and to any determination
subsequently issued in the framework of Resolution No. 80 and concurrent
Resolution No. 82”. As regards the amounts to be paid, the S.C. issued
Resolution No. 82, whereby an “ad hoc” commission was to be created, for the
purpose of identifying the providers required to pay investment contributions to
the Universal Service Trust Fund, analyzing the existing programs and evaluating
their impact in determining the applicable compensations regarding the initial
programs currently underway, determining the amounts corresponding to the
services provided in connection with the Universal Service Program". As of the
date of issuance of these financial statements, the “ad hoc” Commission has not
defined the mechanism and criteria to determine the amounts to be eventually
compensated and the procedures by which the companies may recover any cost
incurred in the execution of the initial programs.
As of the date of
issuance of these financial statements, the Company has filed the monthly
affidavits to the CNC for the periods corresponding to July 2007 through August
2009. Regarding to such monthly affidavits, the Company estimated the amounts
corresponding to the initial programs abovementioned, resulting in a receivable
balance determined for Telefonica to collect from the Trust Fund for a total
amount of 1,062 million for the mentioned period. This amount reflects the
estimated excess amounts incurred by Telefonica in the supply of services under
the Universal Service program during the period July 2007 through August 2009,
and for some of them, the applicable authority has not yet established the
mechanism of valuation or approval.
On April 3, 2008,
the PEN issued Decree No. 558/08 which replaces Exhibit III to Decree No. 764/00
and creates the Trust Fund for the Universal Service, that must be implemented
and set up through the execution of a trust in conformity with Law No. 24,441 in
a term of one hundred and eighty days. The providers of telecommunications
services shall act in their capacity as trustors in this trust, which shall rely
on the assistance of a Technical Committee made up by seven members (two members
shall be appointed by the S.C., one member shall be appointed by the CNC, three
members shall be appointed by the providers – two of which shall be appointed by
the holders of the concession for the supply of basic telephone services – and
the last member to be appointed by Independent Carriers). This Technical
Committee shall be entrusted with the preparation of annual resources forecasts,
the instructions to be imparted to the Trustee, the orders for the Trustee to
disburse the amounts required to finance the Universal Service programs, reports
to the applicable authorities concerning any irregularity identified in the
application of funds. As regards the contributions payable, Decree No. 558/08
sets forth that the duty imposed on each provider to make a given contribution
shall be audited and supervised by the CNC. The amounts payable must be tendered
on the monthly due dates established by the S.C. Additionally, section 10,
sub-section f) of the mentioned Decree sets forth that the Technical Committee
must prepare annual cash flow projections corresponding to the established
programs and communicate them to the Regulatory Authority, clarifying that the
related funding needs may not exceed the financial capacity of the Universal
Service Trust Fund. On May 26, 2008, the Committee for the Organization of the
Universal Service Trust Fund was created, with the purpose of drafting the model
trust agreement, designing the applicable procedure to select the trust manager
and submitting the proposal to the applicable authorities and carry forward with
the public procedure for the selection of the trust manager to be proposed to
the S.C.
On December 9,
2008, Resolution No. 405/08 of the S.C. was issued, which provides that until
the Universal Service Trust Fund is implemented, the providers of
telecommunication services shall deposit in the accounts opened in compliance
with Section 1 of Resolution No. 80/07 of the S.C. the contribution equivalent
to 1% of total revenues from telecommunication services, net of any applicable
tax and automatic deductions, without discounting the amounts that could
eventually be applicable as a result of the execution of the Universal Service
programs that the applicable authority could determine in compliance with
Section 2 of Decree No. 558/08 and Section 6 of the latest Universal Service
Regulations approved by such Decree. The amounts shall be deposited at the due
date related to the subsequent month to that in which the Resolution was
enacted. The amounts to be deposited related to the deductions resulting from
execution of the Universal Service programs as from the implementation of Decree
No. 558/08 until the Resolution was enacted, will not accrue interest. Finally,
the amounts that providers of telecommunication services might be entitled to
receive as result of the execution of Universal Service programs, regardless of
their nature, accrued as from the implementation date of Decree No. 558/08, will
be paid with the amounts to be deposited in the Universal Service Trust Fund.
The Company, as it was merged with TDA S.A.(see note 18.), has complied to file
monthly affidavits to the CNC on behalf of TDA S.A. until April 2009,
inclusively, and has deposited the resulting monthly amount, until that date, in
a Banco de la Nación Argentina account, as described above. As of the closing
date of these financial statements, the balance of the mentioned account amounts
to 3 million.
As of the closing
date of these financial statements, except for the above-mentioned, the Company
does not carry any balances in the accounts opened in the terms of Section 1 of
Resolution S.C. N° 80/07; however, the Company and its legal advisors consider
that this situation may not be contemplate as a non-compliance, that will have a
significant negative effect on the results of the Company’s operations or its
financial position.
Decree No. 558/08
does not provide interpretations contrary to the providers right to offset the
contribution obligation against the amounts for the execution of Universal
Service Programs. However, resolution No. 405/08 of the S.C. provides that the
deposit must be made without discounting the amounts relating to the execution
of Universal Service programs. In the opinion of the Company’s legal advisors,
this last Resolution is illegitimate and arbitrary, and in that sense, the
Company filed a brief challenging this resolution to the S.C. and is now
appealing precautionary measures, whenever the Company considers that it has
solid grounds to support its position.
On January 16,
2009, Resolution No. 7/09 of the S.C. was published in the Official Bulletin,
approving the form of trust agreement whereby the Universal Service Trust Fund
will be implemented, indicating the Banco Itau Buen Ayre S.A. as trust
manager.
As mentioned in
note 2.2.c), the Company calculates the effect corresponding to the Universal
Service contribution, consisting in 1% of revenues from telecommunication
services, net of the automatic deductions provided by the CNC rules and
regulations, and in accordance with the Company’s estimates of the amounts
payable within each period/year, based on the regulations in force as of that
date. In the event that the abovementioned calculation results in amounts
payable by the Company, the corresponding net amount is recorded as a reserve.
All deductions and subsidies that must first be pre-approved by the regulatory
entity will be booked by the Company as receivable in the fiscal year in which
they will probably be reimbursed by such entity and can be valued with
certainty.
The supply of
telecommunications services is governed by the regulations that the Federal
Legislative Power and the agencies under the PEN regulating such activities are
empowered to issue. In addition, the Company is subject to the rules and
regulations inherent in any business conducted at the federal, provincial and
municipal level according to the respective rules and regulations in each
jurisdiction. In particular, telecommunications services are regulated by the
S.C. and are supervised by the CNC subject to the involvement, in certain cases,
of the Federal Anti-Trust Board (“FATB”) and the Under Secretary of Consumers’
Protection. The S.C. establishes the regulation framework and the applicable
policies. The CNC applies the normative framework and the policies and
supervises the telecommunications industry. The FATB enforces and supervises the
dispositions related to competition issues and the Under Secretary of Consumers’
Protection applies and supervises dispositions related to consumer
protection.
Regulations
governing the supply of telecommunications services enacted by the Federal
Legislative Power as laws are enacted after the following process: submission of
a bill, study and/or modification of such bill by the applicable legislative
commissions, a favorable vote by both Houses of the Federal Congress and
enactment of the bill into a law if no veto has been issued by the PEN. At
present there are various legislative initiatives in process,
including:
·
|
bills aimed
at regulating all public utilities, based on the definition of utilities
proposed (which includes the activities subject to regulation carried out
by the Company and establishing the manner in which concessions are
granted as well as the possibility of revoking such concessions, imposing
regulations in the area of tariffs such as, for instance, the prohibition
of automatic tariff adjustment, imposing an obligation to make investments
as a condition to maintain the concession granted, among others),
and
|
|
·
|
bills aimed
at regulating the utilities’ ability to discontinue the supply of services
to customers in arrears.
|
|
Pursuant to the
Memorandum of Understanding 2006, the PEN has undertaken to make efforts to
establish in the future a stable legal framework allowing to regulate the
activities in the sector. To that end, it shall send a bill of proposed
legislation to the Legislative Power which shall include the following minimum
contents:
·
|
assurance of
a stable and effective regulatory framework applicable to the
industry;
|
|
·
|
maintenance
and assurance of legal stability for the benefit of service
development;
|
|
·
|
strengthening
of the Nation's common welfare;
|
|
·
|
assurance of
adequate service supply;
|
|
·
|
assurance of
effective protection for the rights of users and
consumers;
|
|
·
|
incentives to
the involvement of the private sector in
telecommunications;
|
|
·
|
promotion of
a sustainable technological evolution in the sector with a view to fixed
and wireless connectivity;
|
|
·
|
development
of the Argentine telecommunications industry;
|
|
·
|
promotion of
job creation;
|
|
·
|
promotion of
investment commitments that guarantee sustainable development in
telecommunications infrastructures based on respect for the principle of
technological freedom and;
|
|
·
|
establishment
of equal treatment for all providers.
|
|
The Company is
unable to foresee if, in the future, the legislative bills or other regulation
to be proposed will be enacted into law or if they will become part of the
regulatory framework that governs the Company's activities. Nor can the Company
foresee if the original version of the proposals mentioned and/or future
projects shall be amended or not, or if there will be amendments that may have a
lesser or greater impact on the conditions and the framework in which the
Company currently operates.
The financial
statements consider the effects derived, and foreseen by management from the
regulations enacted as of the date of issuance of these financial statements.
The effects of any new regulation that may be issued will be considered when
they effectively come into force and become a part of the regulatory framework
applicable to the Company's activities.
13. SALE
OF TELEFONICA’S EQUITY INTEREST IN TELINVER S.A.
Sale of the Company’s
interest in Telinver S.A.
On November 11,
2005, the Company sold 100% of its shares in Telinver S.A. and other related
assets to TPI and TPII, which acquired 95% and 5% of the shares, respectively,
Spanish companies members of the Telefónica Group and companies affiliates until
August 2006. The transaction was approved by the Company’s Audit Committee prior
to the discussion thereof by the Board of Directors. The Audit Committee
concluded that the transaction, based on its conditions, may be fairly
considered as meeting the normal and usual market conditions.
The Company has
granted the guarantees customary in these kinds of purchase and sale
agreements.
As a result of this
disposal, the Company has discontinued operations in the advertising
exploitation business segment, as the Company continues only with the
telecommunications segment. The balances related to the disposal of Telinver
S.A. are disclosed under the captions “Net liabilities from discontinued
operations”.
Commitments related to the
sale of the equity interest in Telinver S.A.
As part of the sale
transaction of Telinver S.A. mentioned above, the Company granted usual
guarantees in this type of transaction to the TPI Group including the
inexistence of liabilities or encumbrances not disclosed in Telinver S.A.’s
financial statements as of the date of the transaction and the responsibility on
legal, tax, and labor contingencies prior to the acquisition, among
others.
In addition, the
Company guarantees to the TPI Group, during a five-year term counted as from the
date of execution of the sale transaction, that the price of the transaction
will be adjusted in the event of changes in the economic and financial
conditions of the telephone directory advertising exploitation and publishing
agreement, as well as in the event that the Company is prohibited from rendering
the service stipulated in the Offering Letter for the collection and billing
through the telephone bill services.
As mentioned in the
financial statements of Telinver S.A. as of December 31, 2005, on February 14,
February 28, and June 14, 2002, the DGR (Buenos Aires Province tax authorities)
issued three resolutions, whereby turnover tax ex-officio assessment and summary
proceedings were filed against Telinver S.A. for the 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999,
2000 and 2001 (January through July) periods. The amounts claimed in those
notifications are 4.4 million, 0.4 million, and 1.7 million, respectively, plus
the interest provided in the Buenos Aires Province tax code. On January 22,
2004, Telinver S.A. filed an appeal with the Buenos Aires Province
Administrative Tax Court of Appeals.
On November 15,
2005, the Administrative Tax Court of Appeals issued a ruling on the third
resolution whereby it determined that Telinver S.A. should pay a total amount of
15 million, including principal and interest. Telinver S.A. paid 1.7 million of
principal claimed by the DGR as previous requirement to appeal the decision of
the Administrative Tax Court of Appeals before the contentious administrative
courts. In addition, Telinver S.A. requested a precautionary measure based on
the unconstitutional nature of the interest calculation method provided in the
Buenos Aires Province Tax Code. On August 18, 2006, Telinver S.A. was notified
of a report issued by the Tax Technical Advice of the DGR accepting the claim
filed by Telinver S.A. in connection with the application of the cap on interest
established by Law No. 13,405, section 16, and demanding payment of 9.9 million.
Telinver S.A. filed a brief challenging a portion of that amount. On September
20, 2006, Telinver S.A.’s position was dismissed and, in order to avoid an
enforced collection lawsuit, Telinver S.A. informed its will to pay, reserving
the right to challenge payment in the judicial file. On November 11, 2006,
Telinver S.A. paid under protest the amount claimed plus interest for 11 million
and filed a brief abandoning the precautionary injunction
requested.
On April 11, 2007,
certain Telinver S.A. officers received orders to pay in a 5-day term an amount
of 4.4 million plus compensatory interest with respect to the first resolution
previously mentioned. On April 17, 2007 in order to avoid an enforced collection
lawsuit, Telinver S.A. paid the amount claimed by the DGR along with the amount
claimed in the second resolution mentioned above for a total of 26 million,
including interest. Additionally, in November 2007, the Company was notified of
an additional claim from the DGR for differences in the calculation of the
amounts paid for a total amount of 3.2 million. On June 10, 2008, in order to
avoid an enforced collection lawsuit, the Company paid the mentioned amounts
plus interests for a total amount of 3.3 million, still pending the regulation
of professional fees.
Based on the
progress of the case as of the date of issuance of these financial statements
and although the final outcome is subject to the uncertainties inherent to any
pending court judgment, to date, it is uncertain whether the Company be granted
the economic benefits related to the sale in connection with the contingency
mentioned herein and, therefore, has deferred until the uncertainty described
above is resolved an amount, net of payments, of 11 million as of the closing
date of these financial statements.
14. RESTRICTED
ASSETS
Under an agreement
signed between the Company and Intelsat U.K., in connection with the segment
capacity utilized, the Company has granted a guarantee in cash for an amount of
US$ 0.66 million, which has been recorded under the caption Other non-current
receivables.
In addition, the
Company, as it was merged with TDA S.A., also maintains a guarantee in cash as a
payment guarantee of the obligations arising in connection with the segment
capacity utilized in the framework of the agreement executed with Intelsat UK,
for US$ 0.5 million, accruing interest in favor of the Company. The mentioned
cash guarantee is registered under the caption Other non-current
receivables.
According to the
operations from foreign currency forward agreements carried out at ROFEX, the
Company has deposited a total amount of 6.4 million in order to secure the
margins required by the abovementioned stock market. The mentioned cash
guarantee is disclosed under the caption Other current receivables.
15. PLANS
RELATED TO PERSONNEL
On June 21, 2006,
TSA’s General Shareholders’ Meeting approved a performance share plan intended
for certain executives of Telefónica Group (Performance Share Plan or “PSA”). On
November 7, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors took note of the PSA and
entrusted the Chairmans to develop and establish the specific conditions
applicable to the PSA. Additionally, on February 15, 2007, the Company’s Board
of Directors approved the PSA. This plan consists in awarding a specified number
of TSA’s shares to selected beneficiaries as a variable compensation, subject to
compliance with the requirements under the plan.
The PSA is subject
to the following conditions:
|
·
A minimum
number of years of service at the Company, subject to special conditions
in relation to termination of employment.
|
|
|
·
The number of
shares to be awarded depends on the level of achievement, which is based
on the matching of the variation in shareholders’ compensation,
considering quotation and dividends (Total shareholder return – TSR) on
TSA’s shares with respect to the evolution of the TSR related to a group
of listed telecommunication companies, representing the Benchmark
Group.
|
|
|
|
|
The duration
initially considered for the PSA is seven years. The PSA is divided into
five three-years cycles, each of which begins on July 1 and ends on June
30 of the third year following the date of implementation of the
cycle.
|
|
|
|
At the
beginning of each cycle, the number of shares to be granted to the
beneficiaries of the PSA based on the level of achievement of the goals is
determined, observing the maximum number established. Shares are awarded
after the end of each cycle. For the second cycle the maximum number of
shares to be awarded to the Company’s executives benefiting from the PSA
amounts to about 55,818 shares, while for the third and fourth cycle the
maximum number of shares to be awarded amounts to about 61,584 shares,
respectively.
|
|
Cycles are
independent from each other. The first cycle begins on July 1, 2006 (with award
of shares as from July 1, 2009), and the fifth cycle begins on July 1, 2010
(with award of shares as from July 1, 2013). As of June 30, 2009, the first
cycle was ended and the shares were awarded to the Company’s beneficiary
executives.
As of the closing
date of these financial statements, the Company’s liability for this plan
amounts to 3.3 million representing the Company’s obligations as of that date,
without related taxes. For the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, the Company’s expense accrued in relation with this plan amounted to 2.6
million and 0.5 million, respectively.
Early Retirement
Plan
On July 24, 2006
and February 14, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a voluntary
Early Retirement Plan (“the plan”) for the benefit of the Company’s employees
who, upon opting for the plan, have paid contributions to the pension plan for
30 years and still have to pay pension plan contribution for up to 15 years in
order to meet the required age to retire according to current rules and
regulations, among other eligibility requirements. The plan consisted in an
early retirement option accompanied by a financial proposal that provided for an
initial payment and a plan of monthly installments until the required retirement
age is reached. The plan was addressed to all the personnel meeting the
eligibility requirements and it would initially cover from 50 to 120 people for
the first month in force. Until mid-2007 the Company assessed the renewal of the
plan and the incorporation of new beneficiaries on a monthly basis. In mid-2007,
the Company’s Management launched new conditions for the Early Retirement Plan
mainly related to economic features and benefits (additional half-yearly
installments, pension supplements, etc.). This plan was communicated to the
trade unions and beneficiaries and the period to join the plan ended on December
31, 2008. For the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the
Company’s expense accrued in relation to this plan amounted to a loss of 29,1
million and a gain of 5 million, respectively. As of the closing date of these
financial statements, the Company maintains a liability amounting to 163,1
million in relation with this plan that represents the present value of the
payments committed as of the period-end date, considering a risk-free discount
rate estimated by the Company that reflects the market evolution of the time
value of money.
Social Security Plan for
Executives
As of December 31,
2006, the Company’s Management had approved the summary of a social security
plan for executives effective as from January 1, 2006, which consists in making
monthly contributions shared between executives and the Company to a special
vehicle in order to cover contingencies related to retirement, early retirement,
total disability and death of the executives eligible as beneficiaries of the
SSE Plan. On February 15, 2007, the summary of the SSE Plan was approved by the
Company’s Board of Directors. The contributions are based on a percentage of the
annual and fixed gross compensation of the participant and an additional
percentage paid by the Company in different portions. The Company is not liable
for the performance of the funds contributed or for the availability thereof to
the participants. In September 2009, the Company’s Management approved certain
modifications to the SSE Plan’ guidelines, corresponding mainly to the
elimination of a portion. On November 5, 2009, the Company’s Board of Directors
was notified of the modifications. The Company has not completed the
implementation of the abovementioned plan. For the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company’s expense accrued in relation to this
plan amounted to a gain of 8.1 million and to a loss of 2.8 million,
respectively. As of September 30, 2009 the Company maintains a liability
amounting to 4 million, which represent their estimated obligation based on the
current terms as of each date of these financial statements.
16. ACCOUNTING
PRINCIPLES APPLIED
These financial
statements are presented on the basis of accounting principles generally
accepted in Argentina approved by the CPCECABA, as adopted by the CNV. Certain
accounting practices applied by the Company may not conform with those accepted
in the countries in which these financial statements could be used. Accordingly,
these financial statements are not intended to present the information on the
Company’s financial position and the related results of its operations and cash
flows in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the
countries of users of these financial statements, other than
Argentina.
17. FINANCIAL
LEASES
a) As
lessee:
The Company, as it
was merged with TDA S.A. (see note 18.), maintains agreements in which the
assignation of resources is established, in order to cover operating activities
needs. These agreements include clauses determining the value to be paid by the
Company during the effectiveness thereof as charge for the use of the assets
assigned. The call option may be exercised and notified not less than ninety
calendar days before the expiration of each agreement term. Based on the
agreement conditions, and as the Company’s intention is to exercise the call
option, the Company has recognized the value of the assets involved in
accordance with professional accounting standards applicable to financial
leases. The estimated useful life for the fixed assets resulting from the
financial lease agreements is three years.
The amount of the
minimum installments as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
is:
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Nominal value
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up to one
year
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
From one to
five years
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
b) As
lessor:
On the other hand,
the Company as it was merged with TDA S.A.(see note 18.), maintains agreements
similar to those detailed in a) in which it acts as lessor. In accordance with
the conditions of the agreements, some of which envisage call options at market
value, the Company has accounted a low value of the assets involved, in
accordance with professional accounting standards applicable to financial
leases.
The amount of the
minimum installments as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
is:
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Nominal value
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up to one
year
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
From one to
five years
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
18. PURCHASE
OF TDA S.A.’s SHARES
In connection with
the Telefónica’s Group internal reorganization process, on May 4, 2006, the
Company’s Board of Directors approved the purchase of shares that represent
97.89% of the capital stock and votes of TDA S.A., owned by Telefónica Datacorp
S.A. (“DataCorp”), a company indirectly controlled by TSA. This transaction was
approved by the Company’s Audit Committee, prior to its discussion by the Board
of Directors. The Audit Committee considered that the transaction reasonably
qualifies as having been agreed on terms that are usual and customary in the
market.
On June 16, 2006,
the Company and DataCorp entered into a Share Purchase and Sale Agreement which
was subsequently modified on March 31, 2008.
On December 2,
2008, as the conditions and its amendments had been met, the Company and
DataCorp executed the closing agreement (the “Closing Agreement”) whereby
DataCorp agreed to transfer to the Company of 802,645 shares of common stock
each with par value of AR$100 per share and entitled to one vote per share,
representing approximately 99.75% of the capital stock and votes of TDA
S.A.
The transfer of the
above mentioned shares was made as follows:
- On December 2,
2008, concurrently with the execution of the Closing Agreement, 492,228 shares
of common stock of TDA S.A., each with par value Ps.100 and entitled to one
vote, were transferred from DataCorp to the Company;
- On December 11,
2008, 310,417 shares of TDA S.A. common stock, each with par value of AR$100 per
share and entitled to one vote, were transferred from DataCorp to the
Company.
The transaction was
executed for a total amount of US$ 57,084,835.
On December 10,
2008 the Company made a paid-in capital contribution of 100 million in its
controlled company TDA S.A. As a result of this capital increase 1,000,000
shares of common stock, each with par value AR$100 per share and entitled to one
vote, were issued in the Company’s name. This contribution is currently pending
registration of the Public Register of Commerce.
On December 10,
2008, TDA S.A. transferred to the Company its own common stock, equivalent to
1,972 shares representing approximately 0.25% of the capital stock and votes of
TDA S.A. The transaction was made for a total amount of 483,864.
On December 29,
2008, TDA S.A. Shareholders’ Meeting decided to capitalize the comprehensive
adjustment to capital stock, which amounted to 145,227,662, increasing the
capital stock from 180,461,700 to 325,689,362, issuing the corresponding shares
in the name of the Company, sole shareholder. As of the date of issuance of
these financial statements, the registration of this capital stock increase at
the Public Register of Commerce is still pending.
On December 23,
2008, the Company and its subsidiary company TDA S.A. entered into a Preliminary
Merger Agreement, which purpose was (i) to analyze and, if applicable, start the
merger process between both companies as from January 1, 2009; (ii) provide for
the preparation of the related financial statements; and (iii) to provide for
the preparation of a Merger Prospectus and Preliminary Merger Commitment, which
was approved by the Company and TDA S.A.’s Boards of Directors on February 16,
2009. In addition, on April 20, 2009, the Company’s General Ordinary and Special
Class A and B Shareholders’ Meeting, approved the Preliminary Merger Agreement
and the merger by absorption of TDA S.A., which is dissolved without
liquidation.
On June 29, 2009,
the Company and TDA S.A. executed the Final Merger Agreement under which the
Company incorporated by absorption TDA S.A.’s total assets, liabilities and
shareholders’ equity under the terms and conditions set forth in the Preliminary
Merger Agreement. On September 24, 2009, through Resolution No. 16.203, the CNV
decided to authorize the merger by absorption of TDA S.A. under the terms of
Section 82 of Law No. 19.550, to send the files to the Argentine regulatory
agency of business associations (“IGJ”) in order to register the merger by
absorption, and to request the Company proof of the registration of the
dissolution without liquidation of TDA S.A. with the Public Register of
Commerce, which is currently pending.
In accordance with
the abovementioned Preliminary Merger Agreement, the date of the reorganization
was established on January 1, 2009, based on both companies’ book values arising
from the annual financial statements as of December 31, 2008.
On May 1, 2009, TDA
S.A.’s operating and accounting systems were incorporated into the Company’s
systems and the operations of both companies were unified. This merger aimed to
centralize in a single organization the management of the companies, that is to
say, a coordinated and consistent management of all merged activities allowing
an adequate planning and preventing redundant expenses,
with a minor impact
of fixed costs. In addition, the merger allowed to improve commercial management
actions, technical operations, customer service systems, to enhance sales
actions and obtain the following synergies:
1)
|
Economies of
scale arising from the integration of the companies’ telecommunication
networks;
|
2)
|
Improving the
conditions in suppliers
arrangements;
|
3)
|
Costs savings
attained by grouping corporate
activities;
|
4)
|
Shorter times
for developing new product and service markets which will translate in
more satisfied for customers;
|
5)
|
Enhanced
strategic, operational and financial flexibility in the corporate business
segment; and
|
6)
|
Obtainment of
a more convenient structure for the companies’ activities for tax
purposes.
|
In accordance with
the abovementioned, the Company’s financial statements for the nine-month period
ended September 30, 2009 incorporate the assets, liabilities and income and loss
of TDA S.A. since January 1, 2009.
19. OTHER
FINANCIAL STATEMENT INFORMATION
The following
tables present additional financial statement disclosures required under
Argentine GAAP:
d)
|
Allowances
and accruals
|
f)
|
Assets and
liabilities in foreign currency
|
TELEFONICA
DE ARGENTINA S.A.
AS
OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
(amounts
stated in millions of Argentine pesos, restated as described in note
2.1.)
|
|
Original
value
|
|
Main
account
|
|
Amounts
at beginning
of
year
|
|
|
Increases
|
|
|
Retirements
|
|
|
Transfers
(3)
|
|
|
Amounts
at
end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
1,737
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1,731
|
|
Switching
equipment
|
|
|
4,370
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
4,440
|
|
Transmission
equipment
|
|
|
4,916
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
5,188
|
|
Network
installation
|
|
|
7,788
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
7,975
|
|
Telephones,
switchboards, booths and others
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
789
|
|
Furniture and
office equipment
|
|
|
653
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
697
|
|
Automobiles
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Work in
process
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(530
|
)
|
|
|
472
|
|
Materials
(1)
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
81
|
|
Prepayments
to vendors
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
21,181
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
21,569
|
|
Allowance for
impairment (2)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
Total
|
|
|
21,083
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
21,471
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
Main
account
|
|
Accumulated
at beginning of year
|
|
|
Useful
life
(in
years)
|
|
|
For
the
period
|
|
|
Retirements
|
|
|
Accumulated
at
end of period
|
|
|
Net
book value at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
686
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
1,019
|
|
Switching
equipment
|
|
|
4,147
|
|
|
|
10 –
15
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
4,200
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
Transmission
equipment
|
|
|
3,938
|
|
|
|
10 –
12
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
4,128
|
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
Network
installation
|
|
|
6,264
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,556
|
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
Telephones,
switchboards, booths and others
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
2 –
7
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Furniture and
office equipment
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
1 –
5
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Automobiles
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Work in
process
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
472
|
|
Materials
(1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Prepayments
to vendors
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
16,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
718
|
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
16,982
|
|
|
|
4,587
|
|
Allowance for
impairment (2)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Total
|
|
|
16,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
16,904
|
|
|
|
4,567
|
|
(1)
|
Net of 30
million of obsolescence allowance.
|
(2)
|
See notes
2.2.f) and 19.d).
|
(3)
|
Includes 1
million transferred from Others
Assets.
|
TELEFONICA
DE ARGENTINA S.A.
AS
OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 (4)
(amounts
stated in millions of Argentine pesos, restated as described in note
2.1.)
|
|
Original
value
|
|
Main
account
|
|
Amounts
at beginning
of
year
|
|
|
Incorporated
by merger (3)
|
|
|
Increases
|
|
|
Retirements
|
|
|
Transfers
|
|
|
Amounts
at
end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
1,729
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1,737
|
|
Switching
equipment
|
|
|
4,317
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
4,370
|
|
Transmission
equipment
|
|
|
4,376
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
4,916
|
|
Network
installation
|
|
|
7,668
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
7,788
|
|
Telephones,
switchboards, booths and others
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
Furniture and
office equipment
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
653
|
|
Automobiles
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Work in
process
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(301
|
)
|
|
|
670
|
|
Materials
(1)
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
99
|
|
Prepayments
to vendors
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
20,097
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
21,181
|
|
Allowance for
impairment (2)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
Total
|
|
|
20,097
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
21,083
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
Main
account
|
|
Accumulated
at beginning of year
|
|
|
Useful
life
(in
years)
|
|
|
Incorporated
by merger (3)
|
|
|
For
the
year
|
|
|
Retirements
|
|
|
Accumulated
at
end of year
|
|
|
Net
book value at end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
686
|
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
Switching
equipment
|
|
|
4,051
|
|
|
|
10 –
15
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
4,147
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
Transmission
equipment
|
|
|
3,547
|
|
|
|
10 –
12
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
3,938
|
|
|
|
978
|
|
Network
installation
|
|
|
5,813
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
6,264
|
|
|
|
1,524
|
|
Telephones,
switchboards, booths and others
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
2 –
7
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Furniture and
office equipment
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
|
1 –
5
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Automobiles
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Work in
process
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
670
|
|
Materials
(1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Prepayments
to vendors
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
15,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
943
|
|
|
|
(164
|
)
|
|
|
16,349
|
|
|
|
4,832
|
|
Allowance for
impairment (2)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Total
|
|
|
15,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
942
|
|
|
|
(164
|
)
|
|
|
16,278
|
|
|
|
4,805
|
|
(1)
|
Net of 15
million of obsolescence allowance.
|
(2)
|
See notes
2.2.f) and 19.d).
|
b)
Intangible
assets
TELEFONICA
DE ARGENTINA S.A.
AS
OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
(amounts
stated in millions of Argentine pesos, restated as described in note
2.1.)
|
|
Original
cost
|
|
Main
account
|
|
At
beginning of year
|
|
|
Increases
|
|
|
Retirements
|
|
|
Transfers
|
|
|
Amounts
at end
of
period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
License
(frequencies)
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
No
competition obligation
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
IT
applications
|
|
|
940
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
947
|
|
IT
applications in process
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
58
|
|
Client
portfolio
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,014
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Main
account
|
|
At
beginning
of
year
|
|
|
Annual
rate (%)
|
|
|
For
the
period
|
|
|
Retirements
|
|
|
Accumulated
at end
of
period
|
|
|
Net
book value at end
of
period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
License
(frequencies)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
No
competition obligation
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
14-20
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
IT
applications
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
IT
applications in process
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Client
portfolio
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Total
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
b)
Intangible
assets (Cont.)
TELEFONICA
DE ARGENTINA S.A.
AS
OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 (1)
(amounts
stated in millions of Argentine pesos, restated as described in note
2.1.)
|
|
Original
cost
|
|
Main
account
|
|
At
beginning of year
|
|
|
Incorporated
by merger (2)
|
|
|
Increases
|
|
|
Transfers
|
|
|
Amounts
at end
of
year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
License
(frequencies)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
No
competition obligation
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
IT
applications
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
940
|
|
IT
applications in process
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
85
|
|
Client
portfolio
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
Main
account
|
|
At
beginning
of
year
|
|
|
Annual
rate (%)
|
|
|
Incorporated
by merger (2)
|
|
|
For
the
year
|
|
|
Accumulated
at
end
of
year
|
|
|
Net
book value at end
of
year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
License
(frequencies)
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
No
competition obligation
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
14-20
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
IT
applications
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
IT
applications in process
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Client
portfolio
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Total
|
|
|
859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
c)
Investments
TELEFONICA
DE ARGENTINA S.A.
AS
OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2008 (1)
(amounts
stated in millions of Argentine pesos)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Main
account and features
|
|
Book
value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
currency deposits (note 19.f) (2)
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
Local
currency deposits
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Mutual
funds
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
(2)
|
In
2009 and 2008, includes 250 million and 190 million, respectively, with
related companies (see note 11.3).
|
d)
Allowances
and accruals
TELEFONICA
DE ARGENTINA S.A.
AS
OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
(amounts
stated in millions of Argentine pesos)
|
|
|
|
Account
|
|
Balance
at beginning
of
year
|
|
|
Increases
|
|
|
|
Decreases
|
|
|
Balance
at
end of
period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deducted from
current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For doubtful
accounts
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
230
|
|
For
impairment in value and slow turnover
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
236
|
|
Deducted from
noncurrent assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of
fixed assets
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
Allowance on
minimum presumed income tax
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
Total
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
78
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
256
|
|
Included in
current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in
noncurrent liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for
specific tax loss carryforward
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
390
|
|
Total
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
74
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
398
|
|
Included in
net liabilities from discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for
deferred tax assets
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Total
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
(1)
|
Included in
selling expenses in the statement of
operations.
|
(2)
|
Includes 50
million disclosed under “Other expenses, net” and 24 million disclosed
under “Financial expense and holding losses on liabilities” in the
statement of operations.
|
d)
Allowances
and accruals (Cont.)
TELEFONICA
DE ARGENTINA S.A.
AS
OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 (6)
(amounts
stated in millions of Argentine pesos)
|
|
|
|
Account
|
|
Balance
at beginning
of
year
|
|
|
Incorporated
by merger (5)
|
|
|
Increases
|
|
|
Decreases
|
|
|
Balance
at
end of
year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deducted from
current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For doubtful
accounts
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
202
|
|
For
impairment in value and slow turnover
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
206
|
|
Deducted from
noncurrent assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For doubtful
accounts
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Impairment of
fixed assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
Allowance on
minimum presumed income tax
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
Total
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
74
|
(1)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
(2)
|
|
|
234
|
|
Included in
current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in
noncurrent liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for
specific tax loss carryforward
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
358
|
|
Total
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
93
|
(3)
|
|
|
(158
|
)
(4)
|
|
|
396
|
|
Included in
net liabilities from discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for
deferred tax assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Total
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
(1)
|
Included in
selling expenses in the statement of
operations.
|
(2)
|
Includes 12
million for recovery of doubtful
accounts.
|
(3)
|
Includes 64
million disclosed under “Other expenses, net” and 29 million disclosed
under “Financial expense and holding losses on liabilities” in the
statement of operations.
|
(4)
|
Includes 7
million disclosed under “Other expenses, net” in the statement of
operations, related to reversal of reserves. Additionally, includes the
compensation of 28.7 million mentioned in note
9.c).
|
TELEFONICA
DE ARGENTINA S.A.
AS
OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008 (1)
(amounts
stated in millions of Argentine pesos)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
at beginning of year
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
at end of period
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Total (note
3.1.l)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
f)
Assets
and liabilities in foreign currency
TELEFONICA
DE ARGENTINA S.A.
AS
OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2008 (1)
(amounts
stated in millions of Argentine pesos)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Amount
in units of foreign currency (2)
(in
millions)
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Exchange
rate
|
|
|
Book
value
in
millions of pesos
|
|
|
Amount
in units
of
foreign
currency
(2)
(in
millions)
|
|
Currency
|
|
Book
value
in
millions of
pesos
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banks
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
3.842700
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
US$
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
currency deposits
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
3.842700
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
US$
|
|
|
82
|
|
Related
companies
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
3.842700
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
US$
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
receivables
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
3.842700
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
US$
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
SDR
|
|
|
|
6.088259
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
SDR
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other
receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayment to
vendors (3)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
EURO
|
|
|
|
5.627700
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
EURO
|
|
|
15
|
|
Financial
instruments
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
3.842700
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
US$
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
EURO
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
3.842700
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
US$
|
|
|
6
|
|
Total current
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
Noncurrent
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
receivables
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
US$
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
instruments
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
3.842700
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
US$
|
|
|
5
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
3.842700
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
US$
|
|
|
10
|
|
Total
noncurrent assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
payables
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
3.842700
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
US$
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
EURO
|
|
|
|
5.627700
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
EURO
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
SDR
|
|
|
|
6.088259
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
SDR
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
¥
|
|
|
|
0.042874
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
¥
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
|
|
2.154240
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
BRL
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank and
financial payables
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
3.842700
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
US$
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
¥
|
|
|
|
0.042874
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
¥
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
EURO
|
|
|
|
5.627700
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
EURO
|
|
|
10
|
|
Other
payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related
companies
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
EURO
|
|
|
|
5.627700
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
EURO
|
|
|
13
|
|
Financial
instruments
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
3.842700
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
US$
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
US$
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
Noncurrent
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
payables
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
3.842700
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
US$
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank and
financial payables
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
3.842700
|
|
|
|
1,015
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
US$
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
¥
|
|
|
|
0.042874
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
¥
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
EURO
|
|
|
|
5.627700
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
EURO
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related
companies
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
EURO
|
|
|
|
5.627700
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
EURO
|
|
|
3
|
|
Total
noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,255
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) Includes
figures less than 1 million in foreign
currency.
|
(3) Corresponding
to prepayment to vendors for purchases of fixed assets (see note
19.a).
|
US$
:
|
U.S.
dollars
|
¥:
|
Yens
|
EURO:
|
European
Currency
|
SDR:
|
Special
Drawing Rights
|
BRL:
|
Brazilian
Currency
|
|
|
g)
Expenses
incurred
TELEFONICA
DE ARGENTINA S.A.
FOR
THE NINE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008 (1)
(amounts
stated in millions of Argentine pesos)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
ACCOUNT
|
|
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
|
|
ADMINISTRATIVE
EXPENSES
|
|
|
SELLING
EXPENSES
|
|
|
OTHER
EXPENSES,
NET
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries
and social security taxes (2)
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
837
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
Other
payroll expenses
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Fixed
assets depreciation
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
Fees
and payments for services
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
765
|
|
Taxes
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
Advertising
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
Directors’
and statutory auditors’ payments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Material
consumption and other expenditures
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
Management
fee
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Brand
license
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Transportation
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Rentals
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Commissions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Recovery
of doubtful accounts (3)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Tax
on bank transactions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Intangible
assets amortization
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Net
book value of fixed assets retired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Employee
terminations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Total
2009
|
|
|
1,925
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
1,026
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
3,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
2008
|
|
|
1,730
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
739
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,912
|
|
(2)
|
In 2008,
includes 21.1 million related to the compensation of fines according to
the compensation mechanism established by Resolution N° 42 of the
S.C.
|
(3)
|
In 2009 and
2008, includes 12 million and 3 million, respectively, related to
collections from customers written off as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
|
Operating
and Financial Review and Prospects
Telefónica
de Argentina S.A.
Operating
and Financial Review and Prospects
The following discussion should be read
together with the financial statements of Telefónica de Argentina S.A. (“the
Company” or “Telefónica”) for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009
and 2008. Those financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in Argentina approved by the
Professional Council in Economic Sciences of the City of Buenos Aires
(“CPCECABA”), as adopted by the National Securities Commission (“CNV”)
(“Argentine GAAP”), which may differ in certain respects from those accepted in
the countries in which the financial statements could be used (see notes 2.1.
and 16. to the financial statements).
As a consequence of TDA S.A. capital stock
acquisition, as described in note 18. to the financial statements, the Company
established as a reorganization date January 1, 2009, based on both companies
book values resulting from the annual financial statements as of December 31,
2008. In accordance with the Preliminary Merger Agreement, and the schedule
defined by the Company, on May 1, 2009 TDA S.A.’s operating and accounting
systems were incorporated into the Company’s systems and the operations of both
companies were unified. Therefore, the Company’s financial statements for the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 incorporate the assets, liabilities
and income and loss of TDA S.A. S.A. since January 1, 2009.
Critical
Accounting Policies
This information
summary is based upon the Company’s financial statements, which have been
prepared in accordance with Argentine GAAP.
The Company
believes the following represents its critical accounting policies. The
accounting policies are more fully described in notes 2 and 10.1. to the
financial statements. The most critical accounting policies adopted in preparing
the financial statements according to Argentine GAAP relate to:
•
|
the valuation
of goodwill recorded for the investment in TDA S.A. and the assessment of
goodwill recoverability which is based on the Company’s management best
estimate (see note 2.2.h) to the financial
statements);
|
•
|
the
depreciable lives for each category of fixed assets. The Company believes
that the accounting estimate related to the establishment of asset
depreciable lives is a “critical accounting estimate” because: (1) it
requires Management to make estimates about technology evolution and
competitive uses of assets, and (2) the impact of changes in these
estimates could be material to its financial position, as well as its
results of operations. The Company’s Management estimate about technology
and its future development require significant judgment because the impact
of technology advances is difficult to
predict;
|
•
|
the
evaluation of fixed assets and limited life intangible assets for
impairment whenever indicators of impairment exist. Argentine GAAP require
that the recorded value of assets be evaluated for impairment against its
recoverable value, which for a prolonged lived asset is generally defined
as its economic use value. According to those accounting standards, if an
impairment indicator is present, the Company must assess whether the
carrying amount of the assets is recoverable, estimating the amount of
discounted cash flows (future inflows of funds minus future outflows of
funds discounted at a rate that reflects the time value of money and the
risks specifically inherent in the asset) and before financial charges and
income tax. If the amount recorded exceeds the recoverable value, an
adjustment charge is to be recognized based on the fair value of the
asset. The Company believes that the accounting estimate related to asset
impairment is a “critical accounting estimate” because: (1) it requires
the Company’s management to make estimates about future revenues and costs
over the life of the asset; and (2) the impact of recognizing an
impairment could be material to its financial position, as well as its
results of operations. The Company management´s estimates about future
revenues require significant judgment because actual revenues have
fluctuated in the past and may continue to do so especially due to the
pending tariff renegotiation affecting the
Company.
|
In estimating
future revenues, the Company mainly uses its internal business forecasts and
additionally any information it may have regarding changes in significant
variables affecting such forecasts. The Company develops its forecasts based on
recent revenue data for existing products and services, planned timing of new
products and services, estimates of tariff and other industry and macroeconomic
factors.
Fixed assets and
intangible assets have been valued based on their recoverable value on the basis
of the Company Management´s best estimate of future discounted cash flows,
considering current information and future telephone service rates estimates.
The Company, as it was merged with TDA S.A., maintains an allowance for
impairment of fixed assets that as of the closing date of the financial
statements amounts to 20 million. The Company has monitored the evolution of the
macroeconomic variables that affect its business and, from time to time, it has
adjusted its projections based on the latest trends. Notwithstanding this, the
Company’s management will continue to monitor the projections and will assess
the impact of any future developments. As explained in note 1. to the financial
statements, in the opinion of the Company’s management, projecting such trends
and the consideration of operating strategies available for possible scenarios,
the Company will generate future cash flows sufficient to recover the fixed
assets amounts and intangible assets with definite useful life, net of the
allowance for impairment of fixed assets mentioned above. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, as explained in note 8.1. to the financial statements, the Company
will continue to monitor the projected situation and will assess the effect of
any new future developments.
•
|
the creation
of reserves for contingencies assessed as likely by the Company’s
management, based on its estimates and the opinion of its legal counsels
(see note 9. to the financial
statements).
|
•
|
the Company’s
management assess the recoverability of deferred tax assets and tax on
minimum presumed income based on estimates. Minimum presumed income tax is
supplementary to income tax. Therefore, the Company’s tax liabilities for
each fiscal year will be the higher of these two taxes. However, if the
minimum presumed income tax exceeds income tax during one fiscal year,
such excess amount may be computed as a prepayment to any income tax
excess over the minimum presumed income tax that may arise in the next ten
fiscal years. The recoverability of deferred tax assets and minimum
presumed income tax ultimately depends on the Company’s ability to
generate enough taxable income during the periods in which the temporary
differences are expected to be deductible. In making its assessment, the
Company’s management considers the reversal time period of deferred tax
liabilities, projected taxable income and tax planning strategies. This
assessment is based on a series of internal projections which are updated
to reflect the trends. In accordance with accounting principles in force,
a deferred tax assets must be recognized when future deductibility is
likely. As of the closing date of the financial statements, based on the
information and projections available as of that date and considering the
reversal of deferred tax assets and liabilities and the variables
affecting future taxable income, including the foreign exchange rate and
inflation for the next years, and the reduction in foreign currency debt,
the Company considers that the balances of net deferred tax assets and
minimum presumed income tax are likely to be recovered, except for the
specific tax loss carryforward balance. Additionally, the Company’s
management evaluates the uncertain tax positions in the light of the
regulations in force (see note 2.3. to the financial
statements).
|
•
|
the creation
of the allowance for doubtful accounts, for a total amount of 230 million
in order to cover doubtful accounts based on the Company’s estimates
regarding the terms and conditions of their potential future
collection.
|
•
|
the booking
of liabilities related to plans and programs providing for benefits to
employees and Executives (see note 15. to the financial
statements);
|
•
|
the Company’s
management has made certain assumptions with respect to debt obligations,
tax credits and accounts receivable with all levels of the Argentine
government (federal, provincial and municipal governments and governmental
agencies) that they will be honored either through collection or by
delivery of alternative instruments, or by set off against taxes owed or
future taxes payable; and
|
•
|
the Company
is unable to predict the resolutions that may result from the
renegotiation mandated under the Public Emergency Law, the nature of the
future rate schedule or the date on which the future rate schedule will
become effective. The effect of any economic regulation or residual credit
established by the Argentine government will be recognized at the time the
Company takes notice of it and it is effectively approved by the
Regulatory Authority (see note 6. to the financial
statements).
|
The preparation of
financial statements in accordance with Argentine GAAP requires the Company’s
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as
of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during each fiscal year. Final results may differ from those estimated
by the Company’s management.
Among others, the
financial statements reflect the effects of economic and foreign exchange
regulations that were known as of the date of issuance of such financial
statements. All Company managements’ estimates have been made accordingly. The
effects of any additional measures that could be taken by the Argentine
government will be accounted for when the Company’s management becomes aware of
them.
Overview
Some of the more significant influences that
have historically affected, and that continue to affect the Company's business
and its results of operations are:
·
|
the manner in
which the Argentine government has managed the Argentine economy and
directed exchange, monetary and fiscal policies, including the manner in
which it has attempted to restrain Argentine
inflation;
|
·
|
the regulated
nature of the Argentine telecommunications market, including a framework
of decrees of the Federal Executive Power (“PEN”) and various resolutions
that the Telecommunications Regulatory Authority has adopted that impact
the management and performance of the Company’s business
and;
|
·
|
the long-term
strategic vision of the Company, which has guided the various steps that
it has taken over the years to improve profitability and to expand and
modernize its operations and prepare itself for the competitive
environment.
|
Evolution
of the current macroeconomic situation and financial system in
Argentina
After the
expiration of Néstor Kirchner administration for the period 2003 through 2007,
his wife, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, assumed as President of Argentina as
she won the elections in October 2007 in first round by having exceeded the 45%
threshold required by Argentina’s national electoral code. In spite of the
favorable legacy received in economic terms, the lady President will have to
face multiples challenges related to institutional, political, economic, social
and international matters in a context of global crisis, including the loss of
absolute majorities in both houses of the National Congress as from the renewal
of chairs scheduled to be held in December 2009, as a consequence of the outcome
of the recent parlamentary elections held in June 2009.
During the
beginning of the crisis in the international financial markets, Argentina’s
economic activity grew at high rates: annualized rate of 8.7% in 2007 and
annualized rate of 7.0% in 2008, driven by private consumption and by
investment. The Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”) (measured at constant prices)
grew by 9.0% in 2004, by 9.2% in 2005, and by 8.5% in 2006, standing today
almost over 18% above the level recorded in 1998, the previous peak for economic
activity in Argentina. In addition, the Consumer Price Index in Argentina
determined by the “INDEC” remained in a single-digit figure during 2008: 7.2%,
whilst wholesale prices accumulated a 8.8% increase over the year. During the
first nine months of 2009, the retail prices have accumulated a rise of 5.0% and
wholesale prices accumulated a rise of 6.6%.
According to
official figures, the unemployment rate raised slightly to 8.1% of the
economically-active population in the second quarter of 2009 (measured like an
average of four quarters) having reached levels over 20% during the worst
periods of the Argentine crisis 2001-2002. The main cause of this rise is the
fall in the growth rate of GDP. Poverty is at the level of 13.9% of total
population and indigence represents the 4.0% of total population in the first
semester of 2009.
As far as the main
financial variables are concerned, the dollar exchange rate fluctuates around
AR$ 3.80 / AR$ 3.85 per U.S. dollar, meanwhile the capital flight tends to hold
back after the abovementioned elections, as well as the minor depth of the
international crisis. The Merval index closed as of the closing date of the
financial statements in 2,075 points, accumulating in 2009 a 92.2% in
Peso-denominated gain and a 72.2% measured in US dollars. In turn, the interest
rates were moderate compared to those at last fiscal year-end, with the interest
rate for loans to first-level companies (“PRIME”) of 30 days having been set at
17.9% per annum (September 2009 average) and the interest rate for fixed-term
banks deposits of over 1 million pesos (“BADLAR”) of 30 days having been set at
12.2% per annum (September 2009 average).
Argentina’s total
sovereign debt decreased from US$ 189.8 billion, in the first quarter of 2005,
to US$ 140.6 billion (equivalent to 45% of GDP) in the second quarter of 2009.
Those levels of indebtedness are above the level as of December 2001, although
the terms have been extended considerably and the service payment is lower. This
reduction in the country’s sovereign indebtedness is due to the conclusion of
the process to renegotiate the amounts defaulted in the first quarter of 2005
and to the early settlement of the full amount owed to the International
Monetary Fund (“IMF”), made in January 2006, with a disbursement of
about US$ 9.5 billion. Notwithstanding this, there are still US$ 29.1
billion in indebtedness not submitted for swap (hold-outs) and approximately US$
6.2 billion in indebtedness still pending for settlement with Club de
París.
The prospects for
the following months indicate that the economic activity will show a slight
recovery, boosted by the gradual emergence from the international crisis
(especially in emerging and regional countries) and the maintenance of favorable
terms of exchange between the country and the rest of the world.
In the financial
markets the perspective for the exchange rate points to a slide of the Peso
against the US Dollar, while interest rates will keep adjusting in real
terms.
The following table sets forth rates of
inflation, as measured by the Argentine wholesale price index (“WPI”) and the
rate of real growth of Argentine GDP for the periods shown:
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WPI (%
change) (1)
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Price index
figures are for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and
2007.
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDP (annual %
change) (2)
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecommunication
rate regulations
Presidential Decree No. 764/00, issued to
deregulate telecommunications services, sets forth that providers may freely
establish the tariffs and/or the prices of the services supplied to objective
categories of customers, which must be applied non-discriminatorily. However, if
there were no effective competition, as it is the case with the services that
generate a substantial part of the Company’s income, historical providers shall
respect the maximum tariffs laid down in the General Tariff Structure. Below the
values established in such Tariff Structure, these providers may establish their
tariffs freely. To determine the existence of effective competition, the
historical providers shall demonstrate that another or other providers of the
same service have obtained 20% of the total revenue for such service in the
local area of the Basic Telephony Service involved. Additionally, in the case of
domestic and international long-distance services, effective competition shall
be deemed to exist when customers in the area are able to choose through out the
dialing selection method among more than two service providers offering more
than one destination.
In 2000, the
Company filed a request to the effect that effective competition be officially
acknowledged in the Buenos Aires Multiple Area (“AMBA”). Pursuant to Resolution
S.C. No. 304/03, the Secretary of Communications (“S.C.”) established that the
Company should readjust the presentations submitted, supplying additional
information. The Company has complied with this request and no resolution has
yet been made in the case.
For the areas and
services for which effective competition has not been declared to exist, tariff
agreements established that the maximum tariff per pulse should be stated in
U.S. dollars in addition to a right for the Company to choose whether to adjust
such tariff from April 1 to October 1 of each year based on the variation in the
Consumer Price Index of the United States of America. However, the Public
Emergency and Foreign Exchange System Reform Law No. 25,561, dated January 6,
2002, provided that in the agreements executed by the Federal Administration
under public law regulations, including public works and utilities, indexation
clauses based on foreign countries’ price indexes and any other indexation
mechanisms are annulled. Law No. 25,561 also established that the prices and
tariffs resulting from such clauses are denominated in pesos at the AR$ 1 to US$
1 exchange rate. Furthermore, this law authorized the PEN to renegotiate the
above contracts taking into account the following criteria in relation to public
utilities: (a) the impact of tariffs on the competitiveness of the economy and
on distribution of income; (b) service quality and investment plans, when such
aspects are contemplated in the contracts; (c) the interest of users and access
to the services; (d) the security of the systems comprised; and (e) the
profitability of the companies.
The PEN, by means
of Decree No. 293/02, entrusted the Ministry of Economy with the renegotiation
of such agreements, including agreements that govern the provision of basic
(fixed) telephony services. Presidential Decree No. 311/03 created the UNIREN,
which shall be headed by the Ministers of Economy and Production, National
Planning, Public Investment and Services. The UNIREN is in charge of pursuing
the renegotiation process.
Presidential Decree
No. 120/03 authorized the Argentine government to provide for interim tariff
reviews or adjustments as may be deemed necessary or convenient for the purpose
of ensuring the continued availability, safety and quality of services provided
to users under these contracts until the conclusion of the renegotiation
process.
Pursuant to several
laws that established annual extensions, the term to carry out the renegotiation
has been extended until December 31, 2009. The PEN shall be responsible for
submitting the renegotiation proposals to the Argentine Congress, which has to
communicate its decision within a period of 60 running days counted from the
date of reception of the proposal. In the event such period expires without the
Argentine Congress having reached a solution, the proposal is deemed accepted.
If the proposal is rejected, the PEN shall resume the process to renegotiate the
applicable agreement. Law No. 25,790 establishes that the decisions adopted by
the PEN in this renegotiation process shall not be limited to, or subject to,
the stipulations contained in the abovementioned regulatory frameworks currently
governing the concession or license agreements for the respective public
utilities. Renegotiation agreements may cover partial aspects of concession or
license agreements, contain formulas to adjust such agreements or temporarily
amend them and include the possibility of agreeing upon periodical reviews, as
well as the establishment of conditions that must be met by the quality
parameters applied to services. If there were temporary amendments, they should
be taken into consideration in the terms of the final agreements reached with
concessionaires or licensees. The legal provisions do not authorize public
utilities contractors or concessionaires to suspend or alter compliance with
their duties.
In accordance with
Resolution No. 72/03, in February 2003, the Ministry of Economy approved a
methodology to calculate and transfer to the Company’s customers the impact of
the tax on bank account transactions imposed by Law No. 25,413 paid by the
Company as from the date such resolution comes into force. Resolution No. 72/03
expressly refers to the Transfer Contract as the basis for the approval of such
method. Pursuant to Resolution No. 72/03, all taxes paid prior to that date are
included in the contractual renegotiation required by the Public Emergency
Law.
Under the legal
framework described, on May 20, 2004, the Company, Telecom Argentina S.A.
(“Telecom S.A.”) and the Argentine Government signed a Memorandum of
Understanding (the “Memorandum of Understanding”) pursuant to which they agreed
to maintain the General Tariff Structure currently in force for the Basic
Telephony Service until December 31, 2004, without waiving the Company’s rights.
The parties also ratified their intent to reach a final contractual
renegotiation before December 31, 2004, which finally did not happen. In
addition, pursuant to the provisions of the Transfer Contract, they agreed that
any new tax or charge, or any variation in those currently in force, subject to
the control of Regulatory Authorities as established in sub-sections a), c) and
d) under paragraph 12.15 of the List of Conditions, shall be disclosed in the
bills issued to customers for services in the jurisdictions levied with the
respective tax or charge.
With the objective
of establishing mechanisms to enhance access to telecommunications
services, in the Memorandum of Understanding, an agreement was
reached to implement the measures necessary to develop the following
services:
a)
|
Virtual
telephony cards for the beneficiaries of the head of household plan and
for pensioners who do not have a telephone line and who meet the
eligibility requirements set forth in the respective
resolution.
|
|
|
b)
|
Internet
access service in all its provincial centers at discount
prices.
|
c)
|
Addition of
the heads of household who own a telephone line and meet the respective
eligibility requirements for registration, to be registered for the
Program “Retirees, Pensioners and Low-Consumption
Households”.
|
As stated in this
Memorandum of Understanding, the S.C. issued Resolutions No. 261, No. 272 and
No. 73, dated November 12, 2004, November 23, 2004, and March 31, 2005,
respectively.
Resolution No. 261
approved the Company's promotional offer to provide dial-up Internet access
service as described in sub-paragraph b) at lower prices to customers in urban
areas located more than thirty (30) kilometers away from the Company's current
hubs for the supply of 0610 Internet access service, in order to increase the
number of areas that will have access to this service and based on discounts
granted on telephone rates.
Pursuant to
Resolution No. 272, the S.C. accepted the Company's proposal to implement the
"Virtual Telephony" service for the beneficiaries of the Head of Household Plan
mentioned in sub-paragraph a), consisting in the Value Added Voice Messaging
Service, with a related telephone number that allows users to receive and store
messages, available in the Buenos Aires Multiple Area, La Plata, Mar del Plata,
Mendoza, Bahía Blanca and Neuquén.
Pursuant to
Resolution No. 73, dated March 31, 2005 and the clarifying Resolution No. 149
dated June 21, 2005, the Company and Telecom S.A. were instructed to include the
beneficiaries of the Head of Household Plan who already own a telephone line in
the customer category “Retirees, Pensioners and Low-Consumption Households” as
long as they meet the respective requirements for such category. For that
purpose, the Company is under the obligation to request the Federal Social
Security Authorities (“Anses”) to supply it with the National
Register of
Beneficiaries of the head of household plan.
The deep changes in
the Argentine economic model experienced since early 2002 and the current
legislative framework (Public Emergency Law) are to be considered extraordinary
events that significantly altered the economic and financial equation and the
system applicable to the industry, therefore allowing the renegotiation of the
regime to adapt it to the new situation, in full compliance with the principles
established in the List of Conditions and the Transfer Contract, in order to
maintain a regular, continuous and efficient supply of telephony services. The
Transfer Contract contemplates the possibility of automatically adjusting the
tariffs in the case of extraordinary and unforeseen events thereby defined or
government actions or decisions that significantly affect the Transfer
Contract’s original financial equation. It also establishes a compensation on
behalf of the Argentine government when there are extraordinary events,
including actions and decisions of the government such as a freezing on tariffs
or price controls, as well as the procedures to be followed to collect such
compensation.
The Company filed
the information required by the Argentine government and proposed to reestablish
the tariff regime stipulated in the Transfer Contract, which contemplates
peso-denominated tariffs whose intangibility is safeguarded by the application
of the monthly Consumer Price Index in Argentina or, if there were significant
differences between this index and the variation of the U.S. dollar, by the
result obtained from the application of a polynomial formula that considers 40%
of the monthly variation of the price of the U.S. dollar and 60% of the
variation of the monthly Consumer Price Index in Argentina, which had been
annulled with the enactment of the Convertibility Law and the issuance of
Presidential Decree No. 2,585/91. The Company proposed different alternatives to
achieve such objective, especially to handle the transition from current tariffs
to those resulting from the application of the Transfer Contract.
In the Memorandum
of Understanding 2006 mentioned in note 2.3.a) to the financial statements, the
parties agreed to comply with and maintain the legal conditions provided in the
Transfer Contract and regulations effective to date. Thirty days after the
public hearing to discuss the Memorandum of Understanding 2006, which took place
on April 28, 2006, both the Company and its shareholders should suspend for 210
working days all the claims, remedies, and lawsuits filed or in progress before
administrative and arbitral tribunals or any court of law, in Argentina or
abroad, based on or related to the events occurred or measures taken as a result
of the emergency situation under Law No. 25,561 regarding the Company’s license
and Transfer Contract. In this sense, the Company and its shareholders filed in
the time limits established, the suspension requested mentioned in the
Memorandum of Understanding 2006 and then subsequent extensions which latest
maturity date was on April 6, 2009. As of the expiration date, the Company, its
shareholders and the Argentine government expressed their intention to negotiate
the terms of the next steps to be followed. In that sense, Telefónica S.A. and
the Argentine Government requested, in mutual agreement, the CIADI to terminate
the arbitration proceedings initiated by Telefónica S.A., having the Court
ruling so on September 24, 2009. The termination of the arbitration proceedings
does not imply that either Telefónica S.A. or the Argentine
Government waive any of their rights.
The Memorandum of
Understanding 2006 provides that, in order to ensure the necessary
foreseeability in the telecommunications sector and considering the
telecommunications expertise and experience contributed by sector companies, the
PEN committed its efforts to establishing an adequate and consistent regulatory
framework which, based on the legal and technical aspects of the industry,
supplements and strengthens the regulations applicable to the
sector.
In the opinion of
the Company’s Management and its legal advisors, under the general principles of
administrative law applicable to the List of Conditions and the Transfer
Contract, the future rates should be set at levels sufficient to cover the cost
of the service in order to preserve regular, uninterrupted and efficient
provision of the public telephony utility service. It is possible that, over
time, such rates scheme may not maintain the rate values in U.S. dollars or in
constant pesos in relation to any future increase in the general price
level. If a future regulatory framework did not provide for the rates
to change at a pace allowing balancing of the economic and financial equation
that both the List of Conditions and the Transfer Contract intended to preserve,
such rate schedule could have an adverse impact on the Company’s financial
position and future results. As of the date of issuance of the financial
statements, the Company’s Management could not predict the possible outcome of
the renegotiation pursuant to Public Emergency Law or the rates system that will
apply in future or when it will be implemented.
Phone
Number Portability
On January 22,
2009, the Resolution No. 8/2009 of the S.C. was published in the Official
Bulletin, through which an Ad Hoc Working Committee is created in order to
elaborate a legislative project for the Phone Number Portability
Regime.
The “Rules for
Interconnection” (Exhibit II of Decree No. 764 dated September 3, 2000) set
forth in Section 30.2 that clients and/or users have a right to the portability
of their phone numbers. In addition, and according to Sections 4 and 30.1 of the
Regulations above mentioned, the S.C. will determine the terms and conditions in
which Providers will supply phone number portability.
The above-mentioned
working committee shall began its activities within a three-day period as from
the designation of its members: 3 representatives on behalf of the S.C. and 3
representatives on behalf of the National Communications Commission (“CNC”), and
will produce the preliminary legislative draft for the Phone Number Portability
Regime in a 120-day period. As of the date of issuance of the Company’s
financial statements there are no knowledge that the preliminary legislative
draft has been prepared.
Internal
taxes and Turnover tax accrual
The PEN developed a
legislative proposal in order to modify the internal taxes and value added tax
laws as detailed below:
I.
Internal taxes
A) to modify the
spreadsheet annexed to Sub-section b) of Section 70 of the Internal taxes law,
including amongst the products taxed as “other goods” several additional items
such as cell phones and trunking terminals (other goods related to electronics
and air conditioning equipment, among others).
B) to vest the PEN
with faculties to modify the annexed spreadsheet above mentioned, without
changing the total taxed products and to exclude items related to obsolete goods
or not intended for tax purposes. In turn, the PEN may delegate such faculties
to the Ministry of Economy.
II. Value Added Tax
(“VAT”)
To modify the VAT
rate that taxes certain products from 10.50% rate to 21% tax rate. These
products include trunking terminals, video recorders and monitors.
The project has
been approved by the Lower House and the Senate of the National Congress,
excluding of the attached spreadsheet that includes the taxable products the
portable computers ("notebooks" and "netbooks") and extending the taxable
products in the case of air conditioning sets. To date, the project is pending
express or tacit approval by the PEN and its publication in the Official
Bulletin.
Corporate
governance code
On October 11,
2007, the CNV, through its General Resolution No. 516/07, approved the minimum
contents of the Corporate Governance Code of the companies authorized for public
offering of their shares, which were approved as recommendations.
According to the
above-mentioned Resolution, and in accordance with CNV Resolution together with
the financial statements corresponding to the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008, the Company had to a report on its Corporate Governance Code. According to
Resolution No. 544/08 of the CNV, a three-month extension has been granted in
order to comply with this provision.
As from many years,
the Company maintains high standards in terms of corporate governance, which are
substantially in line with the new recommendations issued by the CNV
Resolution.
On the Board
meeting held on February 16, 2009, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the
Good Corporate Governance Report 2008, which details the actions carried out as
of that date, which was submitted to the CNV.
Comparison
of results of operations for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
All references made below to 2009 and 2008 are
to the Company’s nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, which are
presented as described in note 2.5. to the financial statements.
In addition, references to “in real terms” and
“in constant pesos” are to figures restated as described in note 2.1. to the
financial statements. References to “in current terms” are to figures not
restated by inflation.
As a consequence of TDA S.A. capital stock
acquisition, as described in note 18. to the financial statements, the Company
established as a reorganization date January 1, 2009, based on both companies
book values resulting from the annual financial statements as of December 31,
2008. In accordance with the Preliminary Merger Agreement, and the schedule
defined by the Company, on May 1, 2009 TDA S.A.’s operating and accounting
systems were incorporated into the Company’s systems and the operations of both
companies were unified. Therefore, the Company’s financial statements for the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 incorporate the assets, liabilities
and income and loss of TDA S.A. S.A. since January 1, 2009.
The Company presents its balance sheet as of
September 30, 2009, along with the balances as of December 31, 2008,
incorporating, for comparative purposes, the balances of TDA S.A. as from the
date of acquisition of the mentioned company. Therefore, the Company’s balances
corresponding to previous periods to the date of acquisition, do not include the
effects of TDA S.A.’s operations, in accordance with the above mentioned
criteria.
Net
Revenues
Net revenues increased by 20.3% to AR$ 4,169
million in 2009 from AR$ 3,466 million in 2008 (see note 2.5. to the financial
statements).
The increase in revenues was principally due to
an increase in the consumption of different services, mainly internet,
supplemental services and flat rate.
The following table shows operating revenues
stated in millions of pesos by category of services for the nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
Amounts in
million of pesos
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variation
|
|
Basic
telephone service
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured
service
|
|
|
998
|
|
|
|
23.9
|
%
|
|
|
896
|
|
|
|
25,8
|
%
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
Monthly
basic charges (1)
|
|
|
743
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
|
19,9
|
%
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
Special
services
|
|
|
1,277
|
|
|
|
30.6
|
%
|
|
|
744
|
|
|
|
21,5
|
%
|
|
|
71.6
|
%
|
Public
phones
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
-16.0
|
%
|
Access
charges
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
%
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
%
|
|
|
-0.2
|
%
|
International
long-distance service
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
Direct
Lines
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
-21.1
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
18.0
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
4,169
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
3,466
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
20.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes basic
charges and charges for supplemental
services.
|
(2)
|
See note 2.5
to the financial statements.
|
The main variations refer to:
Measured service
includes revenues that the Company collects from the traffic consisting of local
and domestic long-distance calls made by its own customers to other of its own
customers through the Company’s network, to customers of other operators routed
through the Company’s network as well as other operators’ networks. In this last
case, the Company bills and collects revenues for the termination of those calls
(included in Access charges revenues), and pays to the other operators the cost
of using their network (see cost of services provided “Fees and payments for
services”).
Revenues from
measured service increased by AR$ 102 million or 11.4% to AR$ 998 million in
2009 from AR$ 896 million in 2008. The variation was mainly due to: (i) higher
income of packaged services of AR$ 117 million, partially offset by a decrease
in the average consumption of local and domestic long-distance use per line and
(ii) an increase in tariff discounts of approximately AR$ 15 million in 2009 as
compared to 2008.
Revenues from
monthly basic charges increased by AR$ 52 million or 7.5% to AR$ 743 million in
2009 from AR$ 691 million in 2008. The variation was mainly due to: (i) an
increase in revenues from supplemental services, net of unprovided services, of
approximately AR$ 37 million and, (ii) an increase in monthly basic charges of
approximately AR$ 24 million mainly due an increase of 3% in the average number
of billable lines, partially offset by an increase in tariff
discounts of approximately AR$ 9 million.
Revenues from
special services increased by AR$ 533 million or 71.6% to AR$ 1,277 million in
2009 from AR$ 744 million in 2008. The variation was mainly due to: (i) an
increase of internet service, due to higher income generated by ADSL access
charges of AR$ 72 million, for ADSL monthly charges of AR$ 127 million and other
value-added internet services of AR$ 16 million, mainly due to the larger number
of users, (ii) an increase of AR$ 316 million for data transmission related to
the acquisition of TDA S.A. and (iii) an increase of AR$ 2 million due to higher
income generated by other special services.
Revenues from
public phones decreased by AR$ 12 million or 16.0% to AR$ 63 million in 2009
from AR$ 75 million in 2008. The variation mainly results from a drop in the
consumption and less number of lines in third party calling centers, in-store
telephone booths and terminals.
Access charges: the
Company bills and collects revenues resulting from call termination of other
operators through the Company’s network, and pays to the other operators the
cost of using their networks (see costs of services provided “Fees and payments
for services”).
Revenues resulting
from access charges (interconnection) in 2009 amounted to AR$ 601 million, as
compared to AR$ 602 million in 2008, representing a decrease of AR$ 1 million or
by 0.2%. The variation mainly results from: (i) a decrease in monthly
interconnection charges
of
approximately AR$ 9 million, partially offset by (ii) an increase in
interconnection traffic of approximately AR$ 8 million.
International
long-distance service revenues increased by AR$ 22 million or 12.8% to AR$ 194
million in 2009 from AR$ 172 million in 2008. This variation was mainly due to
an increase in suppliers traffic and the exchange rate variations during the
period.
Revenues from
Direct Lines decreased by AR$ 24 million or 21.1% to AR$ 90 million in 2009 from
AR$ 114 million in 2008. The variation was mainly due to the decrease in leases
and monthly charges of direct line circuits.
“Other” revenues
increased to AR$ 203 million in 2009 from AR$ 172 million in 2008 which
represents an increase of AR$ 31 million or 18.0%. This variation was mainly
generated by higher revenues related to advertising in telephone directories, an
increase in other administration services and higher rehabilitation
charges.
Cost
of Services provided, Administrative expenses and Selling expenses (“Operating
cost”)
Cost of services provided, administrative
expenses and selling expenses increased by 20.4% to AR$ 3,384 million in 2009
from AR$ 2,810 million in 2008 (see note 2.5. to the financial
statements).
The following table shows the breakdown of
expenses for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, stated in
million pesos:
|
|
Amounts in
million of pesos
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variation
|
|
Salaries and
social security taxes
|
|
|
837
|
|
|
|
24.7
|
%
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
%
|
|
|
32.9
|
%
|
Amortization
of fixed assets and intangible assets
|
|
|
764
|
|
|
|
22.6
|
%
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
%
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
Fees and
payments for services
|
|
|
1,123
|
|
|
|
33.2
|
%
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
31.9
|
%
|
|
|
25.1
|
%
|
Material
consumption and other expenditures
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
18.6
|
%
|
Allowance for
doubtful accounts
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
52.4
|
%
|
Taxes
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
16.7
|
%
|
Management
fee
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
-100.0
|
%
|
Brand license
fee
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
192.3
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
31.4
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
3,384
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
2,810
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
20.4
|
%
|
(1)
|
See note 2.5
to the financial statements.
|
The main variations of operating costs refer
to:
Salaries and social security taxes increased by
32.9% or AR$ 207 million to AR$ 837 million in 2009 from AR$ 630 million in
2008. The variation was mainly due to an increase in salaries granted by the
Company in the first nine months of 2009 to employees, both included and not
included in the collective bargaining agreement. These increases were
accompanied by an increase in the Company’s average headcount, which varied
approximately 1.9% to 10,637 in 2009 from 10,437 in 2008.
The productivity
index, measured as lines in service by employee decreased from 440.7 in 2008 to
427.5 in 2009.
The amortization of
fixed assets and intangible assets increased from 748 million in 2008 to 764
million in 2009. The increase was mainly due to the depreciation charges
resulting from the additions of fixed assets applied during 2008 and
the first nine months of 2009, partially offset by the assets that were no
longer amortized as from September, 2008 (mainly transmission, switching and
radio equipment and IT applications).
Fees and payments
for services increased by 25.1% or AR$ 225 million to AR$ 1,123 million in 2009
from AR$ 898 million in 2008.
In relation to the
above-mentioned variation, the main increases that are worth to be mentioned
are:
·
|
Interconnection
traffic and links with providers and outgoing international calls for AR$
89 million;
|
·
|
Advertising
expenses for AR$ 27 million, mainly generated by an increase in the number
of advertising and telemarketing
campaigns;
|
·
|
Maintenance
of networks and buildings expenses for AR$ 61
million;
|
·
|
Expenses on
IT services for AR$ 11 million;
|
·
|
Security,
communication and traveling, and other expenses for AR$ 9
million;
|
·
|
Temporary
personnel expenses for AR$ 8
million;
|
·
|
Expenses
related to the edition, printing and distribution of the telephone
directories for AR$ 5 million; and
|
·
|
Paid
commissions for sales for AR$ 21
million.
|
These increases
were partially offset by:
·
|
A decrease in
advisory and consulting expenses for AR$ 6
million.
|
Costs for material
consumption and other expenditures increased from AR$ 97 million in 2008 to AR$
115 million in 2009. The main cause for the change was the increase in the
supplies used by the Company, as a result of the larger average number of
installed lines of ADSL and the higher prices of such supplies.
The allowance for
doubtful accounts increased by a net of AR$ 22 million. The variation was mainly
due to an increase of the allowance for doubtful accounts. The charge in 2009
was AR$ 76 million, which as compared to the AR$ 57 million charged of 2008,
represents an increase of AR$ 19 million; and a total recovery of collection of
past-due customers in 2009 of AR$ 12 million, which as compared to the AR$ 15
million recovered in 2008 represents an increase of AR$ 3 million.
The charge to
income for taxes increased by AR$ 34 million from AR$ 204 million in 2008 to AR$
238 million in 2009. This variation is mainly due to an increase in the
Company’s revenues, the taxable base for determination of certain
taxes.
The charge to
income for management fee in 2008 corresponds to the maturity of the management
agreement in April 2008 (see note 11.2. to the financial
statements).
The charge to
income for brand fee increased by AR$ 25 million, from AR$ 13 million in 2008 to
AR$ 38 million in 2009. The variation is mainly due to the coming into force on
May 1, 2008 of the brand license agreement whereby TSA granted the Company with
a license to use various of its brands in Argentina (including the Telefónica
brand). This agreement shall be in force until December 31, 2011 and may be
renewed for three-year periods (see note 11.2. to the financial
statements).
The charge to
income for other operating costs increased from AR$ 156 million in 2008 to AR$
205 million in 2009, representing a AR$ 49 million increase. The variation is
manly due to an increase in rentals of AR$ 20 million; an increase in cost of
goods sold of AR$ 9 million; an increase of commissions of AR$ 6 million; an
increase in other payroll expenses of AR$ 14 million; an increase of AR$ 4
million in the amount charged to
results for tax on
bank transactions and an increase in other expenses of AR$ 2 million, partially
offset by a decrease in insurance costs of AR$ 6 million.
Other
expenses, net
Other expenses, net increased from AR$ 114
million in 2008 to AR$ 119 million in 2009, which represents an increase of AR$
5 million or 4.4%. The variation is mainly due to an increase in contingencies
and net book value of fixed assets retired charges, partially offset by a
decrease in the employee termination charges.
Financial
income and losses
For the nine months
periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, net financial income and losses
amounted to losses of AR$ 284 million and AR$ 112 million, respectively,
representing an increase of the loss of AR$ 166 million. This variation was
mainly due to: (i) AR$ 36 million and 7 million increase in holding gain/loss
from financial instruments and interest charges, respectively, and (ii) AR$ 143
million increase in the loss from exchange differences, from a gain of AR$ 4
million in 2008 to a loss of AR$ 139 million in 2009, due to a depreciation of
the peso in 2009 as compared to 2008; partially offset by, (iii) a decrease in
the loss in holding loss from government securities and other net financial
expenses of AR$ 14 million, from a loss of AR$16 million in 2008 to a loss of
AR$ 2 million in 2009.
Income
tax
The charge for income tax as of September
30, 2009 and 2008 amounted to AR$ 138 million and AR$ 168 million, respectively.
The variation is mainly due to the decrease in net income for the nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the same period of
2008.
Net
income
Net income
decreased from a gain of AR$ 262 million in 2008 to a gain of AR$ 244 million in
2009. The variation is mainly explained by an increase in operating,
administrative and selling expenses, and an increase in other
expenses, net and an increase in the loss from financial expenses; partially
offset by an increase in net revenues.
Cash
and cash equivalents
Cash and cash
equivalents were AR$ 1,074 million as of September 30, 2009 and AR$ 449 million
as of September 30, 2008. As of the closing date of the financial statements,
34.0% of Company’s cash and cash equivalents are denominated in foreign
currency. As a percentage of total assets, cash and cash equivalents represent
15.6% as of the closing date of the financial statements.
Cash provided by operating activities
were AR$ 1,271 and AR$ 1,410 as of September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Financial
resources and investments
As of the closing
date of the financial statements, the Company held long-term funds from major
financial institutions in an amount equivalent to AR$ 68 million with maturities
between November 2010 and May 2017 accruing a nominal annual interest rate
ranging from 1.75% to 2.30%. These funds have been borrowed under terms and
conditions customary in this kind of transactions, which generally refer to the
commitment not to encumber or grant security interests on its assets or on
present or future revenues, other than certain permitted encumbrances or unless
certain predetermined conditions are met.
As of the closing
date of the financial statements, there were three negotiable obligations series
outstanding:
Issuance
Month/Year
|
Face
Value
as of
September 30, 2009
(in
millions)
|
Term
(in
years)
|
Maturity
Month/
Year
|
Rate per
annum
(%)
|
Use of
proceeds
|
08/03
|
US$195.5
|
7
|
11/2010
|
9.125
|
a)
|
08/03
|
US$0.03
|
8
|
08/2011
|
8.85
|
a)
|
08/03
|
US$134.6
|
8
|
08/2011
|
8.85
|
a)
|
a)
|
Refinancing of
liabilities.
|
On September 24,
2009, the Company issued two purchase offers in cash for its outstanding
negotiable obligations, one in pesos and the other one in U.S. dollars, for a
total maximum purchasing price of US$ 75 million and of 200 million pesos. On
September 25, 2009, the Company notified the CNV the abovementioned purchase
offers. The maturity of the offers was on October 22, 2009.
As of the date of
issuance of the financial statements, the operation ended as planned in the
abovementioned purchase offer, having the Company disbursed a total amount of
US$ 67.9 million and 18.7 million pesos in order to repurchase the outstanding
negotiable obligations as of the closing date of the period, corresponding
to:
- Convertible
negotiable obligations at 8.850% maturing in August 2011 for a face value of US$
28,576 (corresponding to 100% of the series’ outstanding amount).
- Negotiable
obligations at 9.125% maturing November 2010 for a face value of US$ 48.2
million.
-
Negotiable obligations at 8.850% maturing August 2011 for a face value of U$S
17.9 million.
Out of the disbursed amount, US$ 4.2 million
correspond to the premium paid by the Company, which was registered under the
caption “Interest and financial charges” in the statement of operations at the
end of the period.
The prospect
related to the issuance of these negotiable obligations describes the issuance
conditions in detail. The main stipulations concern: a) commitment of the
Company not to create liens, except certain permitted liens, over its present or
future assets or revenues, unless the Company's commitments under the negotiable
obligations meet certain requirements; b) conditions for the early redemption of
the issuance and c) events of default whereby the note holders could accelerate
the maturity dates, such causes being, among others, failure to pay on the
securities, default on other debts in amounts equal to or exceeding US$ 20
million, attachments which in the aggregate exceed US$ 10 million,
etc.
Main funds used in
2009 were to purchase fixed assets and to repay loans and interest. The funds
used to purchase fixes assets and intangible assets in 2009 and 2008 amount to
AR$ 437 million and AR$ 592 million (in 2009 and 2008 net of AR$ 147 million and
AR$ 41 million, respectively, financed with trade payables),
respectively.
The following table
contains a breakdown of the Company’s investments in fixed assets and intangible
assets (1) for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and
2008.
|
|
Millions of
Argentine pesos
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Land,
buildings and equipment
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Transmission
and switching equipment
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
External
plant
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
Telephone
equipment
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Materials
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
IT
applications
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Others
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Total
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
633
|
|
(1)
|
Allocation of
work in process and prepayments to vendors to each line item has been
estimated.
|
Foreign-denominated
debt, receivables and investments
The Company’s bank
and financial payables in foreign currencies as of the closing date of the
financial statements amounted to approximately US$ 343 million (approximately
AR$ 1.3 billion), 10 million euros (approximately AR$ 58 million), and 1.6
billion yens (approximately AR$ 67 million). As of the closing date of the
financial statements, the Company also had the equivalent of approximately AR$
391 million of trade and other payables denominated in foreign currencies.
Approximately AR$ 544 million of the Company’s receivables and investments are
denominated in foreign currency.
As of September 30,
2009, the Company's current assets are lower than its current liabilities by 143
million. The
Company’s general financing policy is to cover future fund needs to continue its
investment plan and repay short and long-term debt mainly with funds generated
by the operations plus bank loans and/or access to capital markets and
ultimately applying for financing from the Company's indirect parent
company.
In the past, the
Company managed to reduce gradually its financial indebtedness through a
combination of cancellations at maturity, issuance of negotiable obligations,
and short and long-term refinancings. The Company expects to arrange for
additional placements in the future. Those placements, in conjunction with
internally-generated cash flows and possible refinancings options and/or other
financing alternatives that the Company may consider will, in the opinion of the
Company’s Management, enable the Company to settle or successfully refinance the
remaining balance of its indebtedness.
Exposure
to foreign exchange rates
In September 1999,
the Company entered into a foreign currency swap agreements with Citibank N.A.
to hedge the risk of fluctuations in the yen-U.S. dollar exchange rate, in
connection with the loan whose nominal amount as of the closing date of the
financial statements was 1.6 billion yen granted by The Export Import Bank of
Japan (currently the Japan Bank for International Cooperation) and maturing in
February 2011, which accrues interest at a rate of 2.3% per annum. The swap
agreement provides a fixed exchange rate of 104.25 yen per U.S. dollar. The
interest rate to be paid to Citibank N.A. during the validity of the loan for
the U.S. dollars received is 7.98% per annum. As of the closing date of the
financial statements, the related liability, taking into account the effect of
the swap and the additional interest accrued, amounts to US$ 16 million. The
contract establishes, among other provisions for this type of transaction,
certain events of default under which the creditor may accelerate payment terms.
Events of default include failure to pay financial debts for amounts in excess
of 2% of the Company's shareholders' equity. As of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, the hedge relationships of this swap was deemed to be
ineffective (see note 2.2.j) to the financial statements).
The Company uses
foreign currency forward agreements, to hedge the risk associated with the
exposure to the exchange rate of financial indebtedness and trade payables
denominated in US Dollars. As of the closing date of the financial statements,
the Company had entered into foreign currency forward agreements with local
banks, offsetting at maturity, for a total of US$ 138 million. The maturity of
these agreements occur from October 2009 to May 2010. The average exchange rate
agreed upon for these transactions was AR$ 4.1727 per U.S. dollar. As of
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the hedge relationships were deemed to
be effective (see note 2.2.j) to the financial statements).
In addition, as of
the closing date of the financial statements, the Company has foreign currency
forward agreements with the ROFEX for a total amount of US$ 15 million, whose
maturity occurs from November, 2009 to July 2010. Regarding the abovementioned
agreements, the Company performs daily adjustments to the compensation account,
in order to reflect the variations relative to the market, considering the
agreed average exchange rate of AR$ 4.0510 per U.S. dollar, fulfilling the
collateral margins required for its transactions. For that purpose, the Company
has made guarantee deposits in order to ensure that the collateral margins
required by the ROFEX are met (see note 14. to the financial statements). As of
September 30, 2009, the hedge relationships were deemed to be effective (see
note 2.2.j) to the financial statements).
Contractual
obligations and commercial commitments
The following table
represents a summary of the Company’s contractual obligations and commercial
commitments:
|
|
Payments due
by period in millions of Argentine Pesos
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-3
years
|
|
|
3-4
years
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5
years
|
|
Contractual obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank and
financial payables
|
|
|
1,607
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Other
obligations
|
|
|
2,075
|
|
|
|
1,793
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
Total
contractual obligations
|
|
|
3,682
|
|
|
|
2,236
|
|
|
|
1,213
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
commercial commitments
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Total
commercial commitments
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Bank and financial
payables include principal and interest. For the debts that accrue a variable
interest
rate, the Company
estimated interest payable based on interest rates in effect as of the closing
date of the financial statements. Actual interest payments may significantly
differ from these estimates on account of interest rate fluctuations. In
addition, approximately 100% of these obligations are denominated in foreign
currency, and therefore principal and interest payments are estimated based on
exchange rates in effect as of the closing date of the financial statements.
Actual foreign currency debt payments may significantly differ from these
estimates due to exchange rate fluctuations.
Statistical
data
The following table provides certain basic
information relating to the development of the Company’s domestic telephone
system.
|
|
Operating
Data
|
|
|
|
September-09
(4)
|
|
|
September-08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lines
installed (1)
|
|
|
5,069,064
|
|
|
|
4,981,004
|
|
Lines in
service (1)
|
|
|
4,599,354
|
|
|
|
4,601,754
|
|
Lines in
service per 100 inhabitants (1) (2)
|
|
|
23.3
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
|
Lines in
service per employee (1) (3)
|
|
|
427.5
|
|
|
|
440.7
|
|
Percentage of
lines connected to digital exchanges (1)
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Public
telephones installed (1)
|
|
|
90,998
|
|
|
|
92,240
|
|
(1)
|
Unaudited
information.
|
(3)
|
Considering
lines in service and the total amount of employees as of the
period-end.
|
(4)
|
See note 18.
to the financial statements.
|
Prospects
of Telefónica de Argentina S.A.
In the 2001 post
crisis scenario, where the companies reacted by carrying out liability
restructurings, mergers and acquisitions, the Company faced extraordinary
challenges, focusing its decisions in the generation and protection of its cash
flows and the fulfillment of its commitments.
Since 2003, the
economy growth facilitated a gradual recovery of the telecommunications services
demand, raising the consumption and favoring the development of new services,
such as broad band, in a highly competitive environment.
In particular, the Company’s results of
operations are sensitive to changes in the peso/ U.S. dollar exchange rate due
to its primary assets and revenues are denominated in pesos while 45% of its
total liabilities are denominated in foreign currency.
In this scenario,
the Company has defined the following management priorities for the short and
medium term, in order to reach its vision of “Improving people’s lives,
facilitate business and contribute to communities progress in which we operate
by supplying innovating services based on Information Technologies and
communications”:
·
|
To continue
developing the traditional basic telephone service and to add new value
added services for the residential segment, small and medium companies,
large companies and the Government;
|
·
|
Becoming a
broadband provider company, leading Internet growth opportunities by
developing ADSL, considered to be the main lever for growth in the
residential segment. The growth plan launched by the Company has allowed
it to consolidate its leading position in the area where it is the
incumbent, maintaining quality and service standards comparable to the
most developed markets around the world and has succeeded in overcoming
the challenge of exceeding one million ADSL customers in 2008.
Additionally, the Company continues to comply the increase of its offer of
value-added services over broadband, enhancing its contents and increasing
the variety of multimedia services;
|
·
|
To
consolidate the Company as a comprehensive supplier for corporate
customers, i.e., with a vision focused on integrated solutions based on
information technology, adapted to the needs of different sectors of the
economy;
|
·
|
To optimize
the use of resources through operating
efficiency;
|
·
|
To continue
with adequate cash management, honoring commitments
assumed;
|
·
|
To promote
the development of an innovation-oriented
culture;
|
·
|
To drive
forward the Company’s conversion into an organization focused on, and
committed to, the customer and to quality, through continued improvement
in customer satisfaction and;
|
·
|
To contribute
to Argentina’s economic and social development by reinforcing the
Company’s positioning as a strategic ally of the
country.
|
One of the
Company’s goals is to deliver innovating services based on communication and
information technology, looking for its customers to become fans of the Company,
maximizing the synergies of a global and integrated company seeking innovation
to capture primarily competitive advantages in marketing services, operational
excellence, and technological development of the business, increasing our
integrated solutions of communications and information, offering a broad range
of products for each business unit, reinforcing the loyalty of our customers
improving quality in our services and becoming one of the best places to work in
Argentina.
The Company intends to continue
consolidating
its
performance in the supply of basic
telephone service and to strengthen its
position as the leading provider of
integrated business solutions in
Argentina
by providing a full range of services
including voice, value added services, and particularly ADSL, and other
high-technology products for various types of corporate users through different
marketing channels.
In particular,
the Company
expects that
the outcome of the renegotiations of the
agreement with the Argentine Government;
and how the government will regulate
tariffs;
may have a
material effect on the results of its operations in future years accompanying
the macroeconomic situation in
Argentina
, including
the level of consumption
, inflation, and
exchange rate
.
We expect our operational costs to rise
during 2009 due to an increase in costs directly related to the increase in our
sales, the effects of inflation in structure costs and the increase in salaries
of our employees.
The Company’s current long-term business
strategy is to maintain and enhance its position in
Argentina
’s competitive telecommunications
market.
This
strategy requires
innovation in the development of new
offers
of
telecommunications services
,
in fixed service,
Broad Band
and other services
,
for corporate and residential
customers,
and
the identification of
opportunities in new geographical
areas.
In this line,
the Company will continue to invest
substantial resources expecting to invest in 2009 approximately AR$ 950 million
in fixed service and
in
Broad Band,
empowering
the contents and variety of the value
added
multimedia
services that may be
supplied
with
that service,
as well as, in training and personnel
development and in incentive programs to reduce costs and improve
efficiency.
The Company considers that the
implementation of these short- and long-term business strategies will continue
having a positive impact on the competitiveness of its telecommunications
activities, reducing the adverse effects of growing
competition.