ELCON's Complaint Dismissed: No Civil Rights for Inventors
22 November 2006 - 1:36AM
PR Newswire (US)
BREA, Calif., Nov. 21 /PRNewswire/ -- ELCON, a provider of research
and development services for the high-tech industry, today
announced that its complaint against Conexant Systems, Inc. (CNXT)
and Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK) was dismissed in the Orange
County Superior Court, California. The complaint alleged that
Conexant, formerly Rockwell Semiconductor Systems, breached its
contract with ELCON by failing to pay patent awards and royalties
to inventor Frank Sacca, J.D., owner of ELCON. Dr. Sacca is the
primary inventor in a portfolio of key patents on modems and power
line technology assigned to Conexant. Eleven U.S. patents were
issued to date. Some patent applications were filed in more than
eighty countries worldwide. Patents provide competitive edge in
technology by excluding others from the market for twenty years.
The suit was filed on April 8, 2004, under case number 04CC04730.
The court refused to compel arbitration, a decision that was
affirmed on appeal. The case resumed in March 2006 under Judge
Dennis S. Choate. On August 24, 2006, Judge Choate unexpectedly
sustained a demurrer of the entire complaint without leave to
amend. "After prevailing on one appeal and perfecting the
complaint, I was very disappointed that this legal action was
dismissed essentially in the pleading stage," said Dr. Sacca, who
is self-represented in this suit. "Judge Choate construed the
agreement to pay royalties as being at the absolute discretion of
the company, whereas the complaint construed the same agreement as
being based on the objective value of patents. Obviously, this
agreement was ambiguous. Therefore, the case should not have been
dismissed with a demurrer," noted Dr. Sacca. "In addition, federal
law makes the inventor the original owner of a patent, and the
rights to the patent are thereafter assigned to the company in
exchange for valuable consideration. Yet, Conexant and Rockwell
failed to provide valuable consideration for these patents,
managing to avoid liability with a contractual artifact. This
should not be allowed to happen under the court's watch," continued
Dr. Sacca. "If the inventor is up in court against two
multi-billion dollar companies, it is difficult to prevail using
traditional principles of contract law, which were not created to
protect intellectual property. Federal law grants original
ownership of a patent to the inventor, but there is no law that
protects the inventor from misappropriation of intellectual
property by unscrupulous companies. The existing law is by far
inadequate," added Dr. Sacca. "Conexant and Rockwell have
entertained a prolonged legal battle against one individual
inventor, which fails to serve justice because it is tantamount to
manipulating the law. This corporate culture has no respect for the
progress of technology and considers itself not only above the law,
but above ethical decency. Orange County is the heart of the
'silicon valley' of Southern California; nevertheless, the inventor
seems to be getting less legal protection than in the Third World
... The court's decision will be appealed," concluded Dr. Sacca.
Inquiries should be directed to Frank Sacca, J.D., Brea,
California, at . DATASOURCE: ELCON CONTACT: Frank Sacca, ELCON,
+1-714-350-8049, Web site: http://www.elcontel.com/
Copyright