Texhoma Energy Inc - Quarterly Report of Financial Condition (10QSB)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-QSB

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal Quarter ended December 31, 2007

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE

ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 000-31987

TEXHOMA ENERGY, INC.

(Name of small business issuer in its charter)

Nevada	20- 4858058
(State of organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

100 Highland Park Village

Dallas, Texas 75205

(Address of principal executive offices)

(214) 295-3380

(Registrant's telephone number)

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ ] No [X].

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X].

At February 8, 2008, there were 245,112,224 shares of the issuer’s common stock outstanding, which includes 500,000 shares vested by Nafi Onat, a Director of the Company on January 1, 2008, which shares have not physically been issued to date.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes [ ] No [X]

-1-

’ PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

TEXHOMA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2007

ASSETS	December 2007			September 2007
	(unaudited)
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	68,405		$	44,785
Restricted cash		505			219,088
Accounts receivable-miscellaneous		46,930			185,350
Accounts receivable-net oil and gas production		254,286			248,882

Total Current Assets		370,126			698,105

Oil and Gas Properties and related assets, net of depletion and depreciation of $2,498,672 and $2,333,426 at December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2007, respectively		4,461,953			4,556,305

Other Assets		431,511			615,728

TOTAL ASSETS	$	5,263,590		$	5,870,138

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	564,922		$	502,875
Accrued expenses		452,868			1,202,438
Notes payable related parties		50,000			453,432
Convertible notes payable		250,000			-

Total Current Liabilities		1,317,790			2,158,745

Long term notes payable		7,935,274			8,155,280

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 9)		-			-

Stockholders’ Deficit
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, 1,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2007		1			1
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized, 231,412,224 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2007, respectively		231,412			231,162
Additional paid-in capital		10,241,739			10,330,166
Retained deficit		(14,462,626	)		(15,005,216	)

Total Stockholders’ Deficit		(3,989,474	)		(4,443,887	)

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT	$	5,265,590		$	5,870,138

See accompanying summary of accounting policies and notes to financial statements

-2-

TEXHOMA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the three months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006

	December
	2007			2006
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Revenues
Oil and gas interests	$	417,590		$	477,665

Total revenues		417,590			477,665

Operating expenses:
Oil and gas exploration		237,568			106,737
Gross Margin		180,022			370,928

Depletion and depreciation		165,246			217,465
General and administrative expenses		(340,332	)		246,061

Operating income (loss)		355,108			(92,598	)

Other income (expenses):
Gain (loss) on sale of furniture and equipment		2,000			-
Stock accretion gain (expense)		89,677			529,129
Loss on impairment of investments					(196,000	)
Gain on extinguishment of debt		370,083
Interest income		1,477			4,077
Interest expense		(275,755	)		(297,268	)

Total other income (expense)		187,482			39,938

Income (loss) before income taxes		542,590			(52,660	)

Net income (loss)	$	542,590		$	(52,660	)

Weighted average common shares outstanding		231,333,448			181,662,252
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding		231,333,448			-

Basic earnings (loss) per share:	$	0.00		$	(0.00	)
Basic diluted earnings per share		0.00			-

See accompanying summary of accounting policies and notes to financial statements.

-3-

TEXHOMA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
For the three months ended December 31, 2007 and for the year ended September 30, 2007
												Paid-In							Total
												Capital							Stockholders’
	Common Stock				Preferred Stock				Paid-In			Preferred		Contributed		Accumulated			Equity
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Capital			Stock		Capital		Deficit			[Deficit]

Balance, September 30, 2006	181,662,252		$	181,662		-		-	$	10,527,155			-		-	$	(12,817,295	)	$	(2,108,478	)

Shares issued June 7, 2007 at $0.0125 per share	18,000,000			18,000						207,000										225,000
Shares issued June 7,2007 at $0.0125 per share	4,800,000			4,800						55,200										60,000
Shares issued, June 10, 2007 for management agreement at $0.02 per share	15,200,000			15,200						288,800										304,000
Shares issued July 1, 2007 for services agreement at $0.02 per share	500,000			500						9,500										10,000
Shares issued July 9, 2007 at $0.0125 per share	1,000,000			1,000						11,500										12,500
Shares issued August 13, 2007 for management agreement at $0.02 per share	10,000,000			10,000						190,000										200,000
Shares issued August 13, 2007 for management agreement at $0.001 per share						1,000		1												1
Net loss at September 30, 2007																	(2,187,921	)		(2,187,921	)
Stock accretion for warrants										(958,989	)									(958,989	)

Balance, September 30, 2007	231,162,252			231,162		1,000		1		10,330,166							(15,005,216	)		(4,443,887	)

Shares issued October 30, 2007 for settlement agreement at $0.006	250,000			250						1,250										1,500
Transfer agent rounding adjustment	(28	)
Net income at December 31, 2007																	542,590			542,590
Stock accretion for warrants										(89,677	)									(89,677	)

Balance at December 31, 2007	231,412,224			231,412		1,000		1		10,241,739							(14,462,626	)		(3,989,474	)

See accompanying summary of accounting policies and notes to financial statements

-4-

TEXHOMA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the three months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006

	December
	2007			2006
	(unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities: Net income (loss)	$	542,590		$	(52,660	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depletion		164,614			216,083
Depreciation and amortization		80,350			81,100
Stock issued for services		-			-
Stock accretion gain		(89,677	)		(529,129	)

Change in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		133,016			147,532
Accounts payable		62,046			(68,077	)
Accrued expenses		(749,570	)		(77,006	)
Other		104,500			(12,000	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		247,869			(294,157	)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Oil and gas property investments and related		(70,895	)		(8 ,900	)
Decline in value of Morgan Creek Investment		-			196,000
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(70,895	)		187,100

Cash flows from financing activities:
Loans from affiliates		-			-
Loan repayment to affiliates		(403,432	)		(15,000	)
Notes payable proceeds		250,000			-
Repayment of notes payable		(220,005	)		(120,257	)
Issuances of stock for services		1,500			-
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		-			-
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(371,937	)		(135,257	)

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(194,963	)		(242,314	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		263,873			489,877
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	68,910		$	247,563

See accompanying summary of accounting policies and notes to financial statements

-5-

TEXHOMA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three months ended December 31, 2007

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Description of Business - Texhoma Energy, Inc. was originally incorporated as Pacific Sports Enterprises, Inc. in 1998. Texhoma is engaged in the exploration for and the production of hydrocarbons, more commonly known as the exploration and production of crude oil and natural gas. In March 2006, Texhoma incorporated a subsidiary, Texaurus Energy, Inc. in Delaware for the same purposes.

Organization and Basis of Presentation – Texhoma’s securities are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the United States of America and its securities currently trade under the symbol “TXHE.OB” on the U.S. Over the Counter Bulletin Board.

The financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Use of Estimates – Texhoma’s financial statement preparation requires that management make estimates and assumptions which affect the reporting of assets and liabilities and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in order to report these financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The primary estimates made by management included in these financial statements are the impairment reserves applied to various long-lived assets and the fair value of its stock tendered in various non-monetary transactions.

Cash and Cash Equivalents - Cash includes all highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and have original maturities of three months or less.

Restricted Cash – Texaurus maintained residual cash from the proceeds of the Laurus Fund note in a restricted account for as long as Texaurus shall have any obligations to Laurus. Texaurus requested that Laurus apply the excess funds as a payment of principal on the Laurus Fund note for approximately $220,000. The remaining balance is comprised of interest earned on the cash balance and deposited in the account after the payment was made.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments - SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Values of Financial Instruments (FAS 107), requires disclosing fair values to the extent practicable for financial instrument, which are recognized or unrecognized in the balance sheet. For certain financial instruments, including cash, accounts payable, and accrued expenses and short term debt, it was assumed that the carrying value does not materially differ from fair value. The fair value of debt was determined based upon current rates at which Texhoma could borrow funds with similar maturities remaining.

Property and Equipment- Property and equipment are recorded at cost less impairment. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets at the rates in the accompanying table.

Asset Category	Depreciation/ Amortization Period

Building	30 Years

Plant & Equipment	7 Years

Production Tooling	$10 per unit

Automotive Equipment	5 Years

Office Equipment	5 to 3 Years

-6-

Texhoma’s subsidiary purchased oil and gas property interests on March 28, 2006 with ownership of their portion of the oil and gas production from the Barnes Creek and Edgerly properties becoming effective January 1, 2006. Little White Lakes was purchased effective April 1, 2006. Depletion is computed based upon the estimated remaining proved reserves as determined by a third party petroleum and geology consulting firm. Based upon those estimations, the total proven reserves for the leaseholds were as follows:

Field	Total Proven Reserves	Remaining at December 31, 2007	Depletion rate for December 31, 2007	Depletion rate for December 31, 2006

Barnes Creek	73,310	49,186	4.4%	5.3%

Edgerly	210,574	50,596	1.3%	1.5%

Little White Lakes	27,673	8,093	20.3%	7.2%

Oil and Natural Gas Exploration and Development - Texhoma records its exploration operations in accordance with SFAS 19, Financial Accounting and Reporting by Oil and Gas Producing Companies (FAS 19). Exploration involves identifying areas that may warrant inspection and/or examination of specific areas that indicate they may possess the presence of oil and gas reserves, including the drilling of exploration wells and collecting seismic data.

Texhoma adopted “Successful Efforts” accounting for exploration costs as defined in FAS 19. Under this method, geological and geophysical costs, the costs of carrying and retaining undeveloped properties such as delay rentals, ad valorem taxes on properties, legal costs for the title defense, maintenance of land and lease records, and dry and bottom hole contributions are charged to expense as incurred. The cost of drilling exploratory wells is capitalized, pending determination of whether the well can produce hydrocarbons. If it is determined the well has no commercial potential, the capitalized costs, net of any salvage value are expensed.

If it is determined subsequent to a financial reporting period and prior to the issuance of financial statements for that reporting period, that an exploratory well has not found commercially exploitable hydrocarbons, any costs incurred through the end of that reporting period, net of salvage value, must be written off in that prior period under FASB Interpretation No. 36, Accounting for Exploratory Wells in Progress at the End of the Period (FAS 36).

Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock - The equity method of accounting for investments in Common Stock when the ownership is 50 percent or less of the voting stock of the enterprise is governed by APB Opinion No. 18, The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock (APB 18). It states that use of the equity method of accounting for an investment is required if the investor exercises significant influence over the operating and financial policies of the investee. APB 18 includes presumptions, based on the investor’s percentage of ownership, as to whether the investor has that ability.

Long-Lived Assets - The Company's accounting policy regarding the assessment of the recoverability of the carrying value of long-lived assets, including property, equipment and purchased intangible assets with finite lives, is to review the carrying value of the assets if the facts and circumstances suggest that they may be impaired. If this review indicates that the carrying value will not be recoverable, as determined based on the projected undiscounted future cash flows, the carrying value is reduced to its estimated fair value.

Income Taxes - Management evaluates the probability of the realization of its deferred income tax assets. The Company has estimated a $2, 365,000 deferred income tax asset at December 31, 2007 relating to net operating loss carryforwards and deductible temporary differences. Of that amount, an estimated $184,000 is related to the net operating gain generated for the quarter ended December 31, 2007. Management determined that because the Company has not yet generated taxable income, because of the change in control that has occurred in the past and the fact that certain losses have been generated outside of the United States, it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized from these operating loss carryforwards and deductible temporary differences. Accordingly, the deferred income tax asset is offset by a full valuation allowance.

-7-

If the Company begins to generate taxable income, management may determine that some or all of the deferred income tax asset may be recognized. Recognition of the asset could increase after tax income in the future. The net operating tax loss carry forward of approximately $5,108,000 expires from 2011 to 2025. The future utilization of the net operating losses is uncertain.

Earnings or ( Loss) Per Share - Per SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share (FAS 128), earnings per share (or loss per share), is computed by dividing the earnings (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of common stock shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution of securities by including other potential common stock, including stock options and warrants, in the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period, if dilutive. Therefore because including options and warrants issued would have an anti-dilutive effect on the loss per share, only the weighted average (loss) per share is reported for periods that report a loss.

Share-Based Payment - In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (FAS 123(R)), which supersedes APB 25. Accordingly, Texhoma is required to measure all stock-based compensation awards using a fair value method and recognize such expense in its financial statements as services are performed. In addition, the adoption of FAS No. 123(R) will require additional accounting related to the income tax effects and additional disclosure regarding the cash flow effects resulting from share-based payment arrangements. FAS No. 123(R) became effective for small business issuers as of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after December 31, 2005.

The effects of the adoption of FAS No. 123(R) on Texhoma’s results of operations and financial position are dependent upon a number of factors, including the number of employee stock options outstanding and unvested, the number of stock-based awards which may be granted in the future, the life and vesting features of stock-based awards which may be granted in the future, the future market value and volatility of Texhoma’s stock, movements in the risk free rate of interest, award exercise and forfeiture patterns, and the valuation model used to estimate the fair value of each award.. In addition, Texhoma utilizes restricted stock units as a key component of its ongoing employee stock-based compensation plan. These awards generally are recognized at their fair value, equal to the quoted market price of Texhoma’s common stock on the date of issuance, and this amount is amortized over the vesting period of the shares of restricted stock held by the grantee

Accounting Changes and Error Corrections - In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154 , Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (FAS 154) . This statement replaces APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes , and SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements, and changes the requirements for the accounting and reporting of a change in accounting principle. This statement applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principles. It also applies to changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the unusual instance that the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions. When a pronouncement includes specific transition provisions, those provisions should be followed. FAS 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of voluntary changes in accounting principles. FAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made during 2007, beginning on January 1, 2007. Texhoma does not believe the adoption of FAS 154 will have a material impact on its financial statements.

Inventory Cost - In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151 , Inventory Costs—an Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4 (FAS 151) . FAS 151 amends Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 43, Chapter 4, to clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current-period charges. In addition, this statement requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The provisions of this statement were effective for inventory costs incurred beginning in Texhoma’s first quarter of 2006. The adoption of FAS 151 did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations , which replaces SFAS No 141. The statement retains the purchase method of accounting for acquisitions, but requires a number of changes, including changes in the manner in which assets and liabilities are recognized in purchase accounting. It also a) alters the recognition of assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contingencies, b) requires the capitalization of in-process research and development at fair value, and c) requires expensing acquisition-related costs as incurred. SFAS No. 141R is effective for us beginning January 1, 2009 and will apply prospectively to business combinations completed on or after that date.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB 5 , which changes the accounting and reporting for minority interests. Minority interests will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and will be reported as a component of equity, separate from the parent’s equity, and purchases or sales of equity interests that do not result in a change in control will be accounted for as equity transactions. In addition, net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest will be included in consolidated net income on the face of the income statement and, upon a loss of control, the interest sold, as well as any interest retained, will be recorded at fair value with any gain or loss recognized in earnings. SFAS No. 160 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2009 and will apply prospectively, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements, which will apply retrospectively. At this current time, we do not believe that adoption of SFAS No. 160 would have any effect on our financial statements.

On January 1, 2007, we adopted Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 06-2 (“EITF 06-2”), Accounting for Sabbatical Leave and Other Similar Benefits Pursuant to FASB Statement No. 43 . EITF 06-2 requires companies to accrue the costs of compensated absences under a sabbatical or similar benefit arrangement over the requisite service period. As we do not currently have a plan for compensated absences under a sabbatical or similar benefit arrangement, the adoption of EITF 06-2 had no effect on our financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities . SFAS No. 159 gives us the irrevocable option to carry many financial assets and liabilities at fair values, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2008, although early adoption is permitted. We are currently assessing the potential impact that electing fair value measurement would have on our financial statements and have not determined what election we will make.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements , which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement does not require any new fair value measurements, but provides guidance on how to measure fair value by providing a fair value hierarchy used to classify the source of the information. SFAS No. 157 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2008. In December 2007, the FASB released a proposed FASB Staff Position (FSP FAS 157-b – Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 ) which, if adopted as proposed, would delay the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). We are currently assessing the potential impact that adoption of this statement would have on our financial statements.

2. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

No acquisitions of oil and gas properties were made during the quarter ended December 31, 2007.

3. SHARE CAPITAL

Stock for Services Compensation Plan - In accordance with Texhoma’s Stock for Services Compensation Plan, on August 26, 2004, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-8 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, for registration under the Securities Act of 1933 of Securities to Be Offered to Employees Pursuant to Employee Benefit Plans to register the shares of common stock under Texhoma’s Plan in an amount of up to 11,000,000 pre forward split shares and 44,000,000 post forward split shares at various exercise prices. The Board of Directors is authorized, without further approval; to issue shares of common stock under the plan from time to time of up to an aggregate of 44,000,000 post forward split shares of the Company’s common stock.

-8-

Common Stock - In May 2007, 4,800,000 shares of our common stock, at $0.0125, were subscribed for in consideration for $60,000.

In May 2007, Valeska Energy Corp. entered into a management agreement with Texhoma for a minimum period of three months. Mr. William M. Simmons is the Chief Executive Officer of Valeska. In exchange for these services, Valeska was issued 15,200,000 shares of Texhoma’s stock as payment and retainer. On June 8, 2007, Capersia transferred 1,000,000 shares of Texhoma stock to Mr. William Simmons and 1,000,000 shares to Valeska Energy Corp.

In June 2007, 18,000,000 shares of our common stock were purchased at $0.0125 per share by Hobart Global Ltd., a British Virgin Islands corporation in exchange for $225,000.

In July 2007, additional shares of common stock were sold to Camecc A/S, a Norwegian company for $12,500 or $0.0125 per share and another 500,000 shares were issued to Mr. Ibrahim Nafi Onat in consideration for his entry into a Consulting Agreement with us.

On or about August 13, 2007, we entered into a Second Amendment to Management Services Agreement with Valeska Energy Corp. (“Valeska” and the “Second Amendment”).

Pursuant to the Second Amendment, we and Valeska agreed to extend the term of the Management Services Agreement until September 30, 2008, and to pay Valeska the following consideration in connection with agreeing to perform the services required by the original Management Services Agreement, and in consideration for allowing Daniel Vesco and William M. Simmons to serve as Directors of the Company, bringing on personnel to assist the Company with the day to day operations of the Company, and helping bring the Company current in its filings (the “Services”):

		1,000 shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock (discussed below);
		A monthly fee of $20,000 per month during the extended term of the Second Amendment, plus reasonable and actual costs incurred by Valeska (or individuals or designees brought on by Valeska, including lodging, car rental and telephone expenses therewith) in connection with such Services;

		10,000,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock; and
		60,000,000 options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, which shall have a cashless exercise provision, shall be valid for a period of three years from their grant date, and shall have an exercise price of $0.02 per share which was greater than 110% of the trading price of the Company’s common stock on the Pinksheets on the day of such grant.

On or about October 30, 2007, we entered into a Cooperation Agreement and Mutual Release with our former consultant Terje Reiersen (“Reiersen” and the “Reiersen Release”). Pursuant to the Reiersen Release, Reiersen agreed to release us, our current and former officers, agents, directors, servants, attorneys, representatives, successors, employees and assigns from any and all rights, obligations, claims, demands and causes of action in contract or tort, under any federal or state law, whether known or unknown, relating to his services with the Company or the Company in general for any matter whatsoever other than in connection with any claims against any former officers or Directors of the Company, which claims Reiersen assigned to the Company. In connection with the Reiersen Release, we paid Reiersen $2,500 and issued Reiersen 250,000 restricted shares of our common stock.

As part of the consulting agreement with Nafi Onat, an additional 500,000 shares of our common stock are to be issued to Mr. Onat, our director and consultant according to the terms of the agreement. These shares were issued to Mr. Onat at $0.006 per share based on the average trading price of the Company's common stock on the Pinksheets on January 2, 2008, the first trading day following the six month period designated as the award date of the common stock.

4. STOCK OPTIONS

Pursuant to the Company's 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan") options were issued at an exercise price of $0.13 per share, which was equal to the average of the highest ($0.125) and lowest ($0.111) quoted selling prices of the Company's common stock on June 1, 2006, multiplied by 110%. The remaining options were granted to the following individuals in the following amounts:

-9-

Options that remain outstanding at December 31, 2007 include issuances of 2,000,000 options to a consultant of the Company in consideration for investor relations services rendered to the Company. The options granted to the consultant were not granted pursuant to the Plan. The options have an exercise price of $0.13 per share, vest at a rate of 250,000 options every three months and expire if unexercised on June 1, 2009.

60,000,000 options were also granted to Valeska Energy Corp. on August 13, 2007 in conjunction with the second amendment to the terms of their management agreement at $0.02 per share and vested immediately. The options expire if unexercised on August 13, 2010.

The following is a summary of the option activity during the three months ended December 31, 2007:

	Number		Average
	Of		Exercise
	Options		Price

Outstanding at October 1, 2007		62,000,000	$	0.0235
Granted and Expired		-		-
Balance at December 31, 2007		62,000,000	$	0.0235

Compensation costs associated with the issuance of options to purchase shares of common stock to employees, directors or consultants is measured at fair value at the date of issuance based upon the options vested and expensed during the current period.

As of December 31, 2007, 61,250,000 of the options were vested. Based on our knowledge as of the date of this filing, we have not applied a forfeiture rate to the vested options. We reduced the accrual for option expense by $589,546 in our current financial statements. The trading price of our stock was $0.006 per share on December 31, 2007. The Black-Scholes option model with the following assumptions: weighted average risk-free interest rate of 4.25%, estimated volatility of 243%, weighted-average expected life of 2.6 years and no expected dividend yield, resulted in a fair value per option of $0.005.

5. RELATED PARTIES

On December 7, 2004, the Company borrowed $50,000 from a related party, MFS Technology. The loan is evidenced by a convertible promissory note, see Note 6 for additional information.

In June 2007, Valeska Energy Corp. entered into a management agreement with Texhoma for a minimum period of three months. Mr. William Simmons is the Chief Executive Officer of Valeska. In exchange for these services, Valeska was issued 15,200,000 shares of Texhoma’s stock as payment and retainer. On June 8, 2007, Capersia transferred 1,000,000 shares of Texhoma stock to Mr. William Simmons and 1,000,000 shares to Valeska Energy Corp.

In July 2007, 500,000 shares were issued to Mr. Ibrahim Nafi Onat in consideration for his entry into a consulting agreement with us.

On or about August 13, 2007, we entered into a Second Amendment to Management Services Agreement with Valeska Energy Corp. (“Valeska” and the “Second Amendment”).

		1,000 shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock;
		A monthly fee of $20,000 per month during the extended term of the Second Amendment, plus reasonable and actual costs incurred by Valeska (or individuals or designees brought on by Valeska, including lodging, car rental and telephone expenses therewith) in connection with such Services;

		10,000,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock; and
		60,000,000 options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, which shall have a cashless exercise provision, shall be valid for a period of three years from their grant date, and had an exercise price of $0.02 per share, equal to greater than 110% of the trading price of the Company’s common stock on the Pinksheets on the day of such grant.

All of the above transactions may have been entered into at terms which may not have been available to unrelated parties.

-10-

6. NOTES PAYABLE AND CONVERTIBLE LOANS

On December 7, 2004, the Company borrowed $50,000 from a related party. The loan is evidenced by a convertible promissory note. The loan bears interest at 5% per annum calculated 6 months after the advancement of funds. $25,000 was due on June 7, 2005 and the remaining balance, plus interest was due on December 7, 2005. The loan has not been repaid, extended or converted. The lender has the option during the term of the loan, and any extension, to convert the principle and interest into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.30 per shares.

The Laurus Master Fund, Ltd (“Laurus”) note accrues interest at the Prime Rate plus two percent (2.0%) as published in The Wall Street Journal, but shall not at any time be less than eight percent (8.0%). Payments of accrued interest and principal equal eighty (80%) of the Net Revenue paid to Texaurus in respect of oil, gas and/or other hydrocarbon production in which Texaurus has an interest and each payment is applied first to accrued interest due and then to the principal balance of the note

On or about October 19, 2006, we issued a Promissory Note to Mr. Frank Jacobs, our then Director, in the amount of $493,643.77, which amount represented funds advanced to the Company by Mr. Jacobs during the 2006 calendar year and management fees owed to Mr. Jacobs for his services to the Company during the 2006 calendar year (the “Jacobs' Note”). The Jacobs' Note bears interest at the rate of 6% per annum until paid, and is payable by the Company at any time on demand. The Jacobs' Note may be pre-paid at any time without penalty. Any amounts not paid on the Jacobs' Note when due shall bear interest at the rate of 15% per annum. As discussed below, the Jacobs Note and all affiliated notes were forgiven.

On or about June 5, 2007, we entered into an Agreement with Jacobs Oil & Gas Limited (“Jacobs”), pursuant to which Jacobs agreed that no interest would be due from us and/or accrue on the principal or accrued interest to date on his outstanding Promissory Note for the period of one (1) year from the date of the Agreement and that he would not try to collect the principal and/or accrued interest on such note for a period of one (1) year.

The Company also entered into a Security Agreement with Mr. Jacobs under which Agreement the Board of Directors ratified the assignment of 200,000 shares of the common stock of Morgan Creek Energy Corp., which shares were held by the Company, to Mr. Jacobs as security for the money that is owed to Mr. Jacobs under the Jacobs' Note.

On or about November 2, 2007, we entered into a First Amendment to Securities Purchase Agreement, Secured Term Note and Registration Rights Agreement with Laurus (the “First Amendment”). Pursuant to the First Amendment, Laurus agreed to:

(a)	waive any default which may have occurred as a result of our failure to become current in our filings with the Commission, assuming that we become current in our filings prior to December 15, 2007;

(b)	amend the terms of the Laurus Note to provide that a “Change of Control” of Texaurus under the Note, which requires approval of Laurus, includes any change in Directors such that Daniel Vesco and William M. Simmons are no longer Directors of Texaurus; and

(c)

amend the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement with Laurus to provide that the date we are required to gain effectiveness of a registration statement registering the shares of common stock issuable in connection with the exercise of the Laurus Warrant in the Company is amended to no later than April 30, 2008, and that the effective date of any additional registration statements required to be filed by us in connection with the Registration Rights Agreement, shall be thirty (30) days from such filing date.

-11-

On or about November 28, 2007, we entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release (the “Agreement”) by and between the Company, Frank A. Jacobs, our former officer and Director (“Jacobs”), and Jacobs Oil & Gas Limited, a British Columbia corporation (“JOGL” and collectively with Jacobs, the “Jacobs Parties”), Clover Capital, a creditor of the Company (“Clover”), Capersia Pte. Ltd., a Singapore company and a significant stockholder of the Company (“Capersia”), Peter Wilson, an individual and a former Director of the Company (“Wilson”), and Sterling Grant Capital, Inc., a British Columbia corporation, controlled by Mr. Wilson (“SGC” and collectively with Clover, Capersia and Wilson, the “Non-Jacobs Parties,” and with the Jacobs Parties, the “Interested Parties”). We had various disputes with the Interested Parties relating to the issuances of and transfers of various shares of our common stock and various of the Interested Parties had alleged that we owed them consideration (the “Disputes”). We entered into the Agreement to settle the Disputes with the Interested Parties.

In consideration for the Company agreeing to enter into the Agreement, the Jacobs Parties agreed to the following terms: the Jacobs Parties would return to the Company for cancellation 5,000,000 of the 7,500,000 shares purchased by Jacobs in March 2006 (the “Jacobs Shares”); all debt owed by Texhoma to the Jacobs Parties, known or unknown, was discharged and forgiven, including the total outstanding amount of the approximately $500,000 Promissory Note owed to Frank A. Jacobs by the Company (the “Jacobs Note”); the Company owes Jacobs no rights to contribution and/or indemnification in connection with Jacobs employment with the Company; Jacobs agreed to certify the accuracy and correctness of the Company’s previously prepared annual and interim financial statements and periodic reports, relating to the time period of his employment from approximately January 2005 to June 2007; the Jacobs Parties agreed they have no interest in and will not interfere with the issuance of or any subsequent transfers of shares to or from Lucayan Oil and Gas Investments, Ltd. (the “LOGI Shares”), a Bahamas corporation; Jacobs agreed to use his best efforts to answer the Company’s questions and produce documents in the future regarding operations and financials of the Company; Jacobs agreed that he no longer holds any exercisable options of the Company; the Voting Agreement entered into between various parties in June 2007, including Jacobs, remains in full affect and force against Jacobs; and Jacobs has no interest in any shares other than the aforementioned 2,500,000 shares.

Additionally, in consideration for the Company agreeing to enter into the Agreement, the Non-Jacobs Parties agreed to the following terms: any and all debts owed by Texhoma to Clover, which purportedly totaled approximately $60,000, Capersia, which purportedly totaled $60,000 or any of the Non-Jacobs Parties (including approximately $20,000 purportedly owed to Wilson) was discharged and forgiven; the Non-Jacobs Parties agreed that they have no interest in and will not interfere with the issuance of the LOGI Shares; the Voting Agreement remains in full force and effect against Capersia; and in connection with the 30,000,000 shares of Company stock in Capersia’s possession received through Texhoma’s previous purchase of a 40% interest in Black Swan Petroleum Pty. Ltd. (the “Capersia Shares”), Capersia will not transfer shares in excess of 2% of Texhoma’s then outstanding shares in any three (3) month period, until the second anniversary of the Agreement.

As a result of the Agreement, the Company was able to settle approximately $640,000 in debt which it purportedly owed to the various Interested Parties and to settle any and all other claims which such parties, in return for the consideration discussed above, which mainly consisted of assigning the rights to the 200,000 shares of Morgan Creek Energy Corp. stock to Frank A. Jacobs, which shares had an approximate value of $92,000 based on the trading price of Morgan Creek Energy Corp.’s common stock on the date of the Agreement of $0.46. The extinguishment of this debt resulted in a gain of approximately $370,000 for us.

On or about November 28, 2007, we entered into a Subscription Agreement with Pagest Services SA, a Swiss Company, pursuant to which we agreed to sell two units consisting of $125,000 in Convertible Promissory Notes with a conversion price of $0.0125 per share, convertible at the option of Purchaser, into the Company’s common stock, and Class A and Class B Warrants to purchase 5,000,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.02 and $0.03 per share, respectively, exercisable for a period of two years from the date of the Subscription Agreement (the “Units”). One Unit was sold immediately to the Purchaser, and one Unit was sold on December 19, 2007. The Convertible Promissory Notes bear interest at the rate of 2% per annum, until paid in full, which amount will increase to 15% per annum, upon the occurrence of an Event of Default (as defined in the Convertible Promissory Notes). The Convertible Promissory Notes are due on the first anniversary of the date they are sold, with the first $125,000 in Convertible Promissory Notes being due on November 28, 2008, unless converted into shares of our common stock. In the event that our common stock trades on the market or exchange on which it then trades, at a trading price of more than $0.02 per share, for any 10 day trading period, the Convertible Promissory Note will automatically convert into shares of our common stock at the rate of one share for each $0.0125 owed to the subscriber. We also agreed to provide the subscriber piggy-back subscription rights in connection with the sale of the Units.

-12-

7. NET INCOME OR (LOSS) PER SHARE

Restricted shares and warrants are included in the computation of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the periods presented. The net income (loss) per common share is calculated by dividing the consolidated loss by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the periods. If we report net losses for any period presented, the inclusion of options and warrants in the calculation would be anti-dilutive, and they are excluded from the computation presented in the financial statements for periods of (loss). Although we reported net income for the three months ended December 31, 2007, we have not included non-vested stock options or warrants in our fully diluted earnings per share calculations as the exercise price is above the average market price for all stock options granted and warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2007; and therefore, these stock options and warrants would have an anti-dilutive effect if included in the fully diluted earnings per share calculation.

8. WARRANTS

The following is a summary of the warrant activity during the three months ended December 31, 2007:

			Weighted
	Number		Average
	Of		Exercise
	Warrants		Price

Outstanding, October 1, 2007		11,687,500	$	0.04
Granted		10,000,000		0.025
Outstanding at December 31, 2007		21,687,500	$	0.033

Costs attributable to the issuance of share purchase warrants are measured at fair value at the date of issuance and expensed with a corresponding increase to additional Paid-in-Capital at the time of issuance. When the warrant is exercised, the receipt of consideration is an increase in common share capital and Paid-in-Capital.

We granted 10,000,000 warrants during the three months ended December 31, 2007 at exercise prices of $0.02 and $0.03 per share.

The trading price of our stock was $0.006 per share on December 31, 2007. Warrants were originally issued at prices of $0.02 to $0.04 resulting in a weighted average price of $0.033 per share. The Black-Scholes option model with the following assumptions: weighted average risk-free interest rate of 4.25%, estimated volatility of 243%, weighted-average expected life of 2.6 years and no expected dividend yield, resulted in a fair value per warrant of $0.00539.

The fair value of the warrants granted and vested during the three months ended December 31, 2007, based upon the Black-Scholes option pricing model was $116,944 a decrease of $89,677 from the expense at September 30, 2007and as such we reflected the reduction to expense previously reported in our current financial statements.

The earnings per share presentation reflects only the weighted average loss per share for the periods of loss, because including the warrants when a loss is being reported has an anti-dilutive effect on earnings (loss) per share calculations.

9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

As discussed in prior years filings, management wound down operations in Thailand and Australia after unsuccessful drilling in the Concession of Black Swan Petroleum. A determination has not been made as to the financial or legal consequence to Texhoma or its officers or its shareholders, for subsequent obligations, if any, to persons or governmental entities which may arise from doing business or owning or leasing property in Thailand and Australia.

-13-

10. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In January 2008, 500,000 shares or our common stock were issued to Mr. Nafi Onat, our director and consultant according to the terms of his consulting agreement. These shares were issued to Mr. Onat at $0.006 per share based upon the average trading price of TXHE.PK on January 2, 2008 the first day of trading following the six month period designated as the award date of the common stock.

On January 18, 2008, 18,200,000 shares of our common stock were issued to Valeska Energy Corp., as agreed in the Management Agreement upon the Company’s financial statements being current and upon application by the Company to trade its common stock on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board, which had occurred as of January 18, 2008.

11. GOING CONCERN ISSUES

We cannot provide any assurances that the Company will be able to secure sufficient funds to satisfy the cash requirements for the next 12 months. The inability to secure additional funds would have a material adverse effect on the Company.

These financial statements are presented on the basis that the Company will continue as a going concern. Other than the previously disclosed impairments, no adjustments have been made to these financial statements to give effect to valuation adjustments that may be necessary in the event the Company is not able to continue as a going concern. The effect of those adjustments, if any, could be substantial.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company reported net income from operations of $543,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2007 but has incurred $14,463,000 in cumulative losses. Further, the Company has inadequate working capital to maintain or develop its operations, and is dependent upon funds from its stockholders and third party financing.

These factors raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties. There is no assurance that the Company will receive the necessary loans required to funds its exploration plans.

* * * * * * * * *

-14-

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

ALL STATEMENTS IN THIS DISCUSSION THAT ARE NOT HISTORICAL ARE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 21E OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED. STATEMENTS PRECEDED BY, FOLLOWED BY OR THAT OTHERWISE INCLUDE THE WORDS "BELIEVES", "EXPECTS", "ANTICIPATES", "INTENDS", "PROJECTS", "ESTIMATES", "PLANS", "MAY INCREASE", "MAY FLUCTUATE" AND SIMILAR EXPRESSIONS OR FUTURE OR CONDITIONAL VERBS SUCH AS "SHOULD", "WOULD", "MAY" AND "COULD" ARE GENERALLY FORWARD-LOOKING IN NATURE AND NOT HISTORICAL FACTS. THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS WERE BASED ON VARIOUS FACTORS AND WERE DERIVED UTILIZING NUMEROUS IMPORTANT ASSUMPTIONS AND OTHER IMPORTANT FACTORS THAT COULD CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE IN THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS INCLUDE THE INFORMATION CONCERNING OUR FUTURE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE, BUSINESS STRATEGY, PROJECTED PLANS AND OBJECTIVES. THESE FACTORS INCLUDE, AMONG OTHERS, THE FACTORS SET FORTH BELOW UNDER THE HEADING "RISK FACTORS." ALTHOUGH WE BELIEVE THAT THE EXPECTATIONS REFLECTED IN THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE REASONABLE, WE CANNOT GUARANTEE FUTURE RESULTS, LEVELS OF ACTIVITY, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS. MOST OF THESE FACTORS ARE DIFFICULT TO PREDICT ACCURATELY AND ARE GENERALLY BEYOND OUR CONTROL. WE ARE UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO PUBLICLY UPDATE ANY OF THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS TO REFLECT EVENTS OR CIRCUMSTANCES AFTER THE DATE HEREOF OR TO REFLECT THE OCCURRENCE OF UNANTICIPATED EVENTS. READERS ARE CAUTIONED NOT TO PLACE UNDUE RELIANCE ON THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. REFERENCES IN THIS FORM 10-QSB, UNLESS ANOTHER DATE IS STATED, ARE TO DECEMBER 31, 2007. AS USED HEREIN, THE “COMPANY,” “TEXHOMA,” “WE,” “US,” “OUR” AND WORDS OF SIMILAR MEANING REFER TO TEXHOMA ENERGY, INC. AND ITS WHOLLY OWNED DELAWARE SUBSIDIARY, TEXAURUS ENERGY, INC., UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED.

ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Business History

Texhoma Energy, Inc. (“we,” “us,” the “Company”, and “Texhoma”), was originally formed as a Nevada corporation on September 28, 1998 as Pacific Sports Enterprises, Inc. Our business objective was to own and operate a professional basketball team that would be a member of the American Basketball Association. The American Basketball Association was not successful in organizing the league, and consequently the member teams ceased operating activities in 1999. Thereafter, we were dormant without any business operations until October 20, 2000.

In May 2001, we changed our name to Make Your Move, Inc. and on September 20, 2004, we changed our name to Texhoma Energy, Inc. in connection with our change in business focus to oil and gas exploration and production.

Effective May 28, 2004, we affected a 1:150 reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock. Effective November 9, 2004, we affected a 4:1 forward split of our issued and outstanding common stock. Unless otherwise stated all share amounts listed throughout this filing retroactively take into account both the May 28, 2004 reverse stock split and the November 9, 2004 forward stock split.

On November 5, 2004, we entered into a Sale and Purchase Agreement with Capersia Pte. Ltd., a Singapore company (“Capersia”), to acquire 40% of an oil and gas exploration license operated by Black Swan Petroleum Pty. Ltd. (“Black Swan”) and its wholly owned subsidiary Black Swan Petroleum (Thailand) Limited (“Black Swan Thai”). Black Swan Thai owned the license, permits and title to a petroleum concession in the Chumphon Basin in the Gulf of Thailand, referred to as “Block B7/38” (the “Concession”).

-15-

Black Swan recommenced exploration operations of the Concession and Black Swan drilled two exploration wells in February and March 2005, which proved void of commercially viable hydrocarbons. In June 2005 after completion of the exploration activities, the venturers decided to discontinue the exploration efforts in Thailand and relinquished the Concession back to the government of Thailand.

On January 20, 2006 we divested our shareholding in Black Swan and Black Swan Thai.

After the exploration venture in Thailand the Board of Directors of the Company decided to shift its focus to domestic oil and gas exploration and production, with a particular focus on south Louisiana and east Texas, including near-shore Gulf of Mexico.

On February 2, 2006, we executed a Sale and Purchase Agreement (the “Clovelly SPA”) with Sterling Grant Capital, Inc. pursuant to which we acquired a 5% (five percent) working interest in the Clovelly South prospect (bringing our total working interest to 11%) located in Lafourche Parish, Louisiana. As a result, the Company agreed to fund the work program for the Clovelly South project in accordance with the Joint Operating Agreement for the property. The Allain-Lebreton No. 2 well was drilled and plugged and abandoned in September 2006.

On March 15, 2006, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Texaurus Energy, Inc., which was formed in March 2006 as a Delaware corporation ("Texaurus"), entered into a Sales and Purchase Agreement with Structured Capital Corp., a Texas corporation to purchase certain oil and gas leases in Vermillion Parish, Louisiana. The 8% working interest (5.38167% net revenue interest) in the Intracoastal City field was acquired for a) two million five hundred thousand dollars ($2,500,000) and b) the issuance of 37,500,000 shares of our common stock.

On March 28, 2006 Texaurus entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement ("Securities Purchase Agreement") with Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. ("Laurus"); a Registration Rights Agreement with Laurus; issued Laurus a Common Stock Purchase Warrant; entered into a Master Security Agreement with Laurus; sold Laurus a Secured Term Note in the amount of $8,500,000, and entered into various other agreements. Additionally, in connection with the closing, we issued Laurus a Common Stock Purchase Warrant to purchase up to 10,625,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.04 per share.

In addition Laurus can acquire up to 961 shares of Texaurus’ common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share, representing 49% of Texaurus’ outstanding common stock. This will be valued at Fair Market Value as of the date of the transaction.

The Securities Purchase Agreement and Laurus March 2006 funding is described in greater detail below under “March 2006 Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. Funding.”

On March 28, 2006, with an effective date of January 1, 2006, Texaurus closed a Sales & Purchase Agreement to purchase certain interests in the Barnes Creek gas field and the Edgerly field from Kilrush Petroleum, Inc. Texaurus paid the $5,225,000 purchase price with proceeds received from its sale of the Secured Term Note with Laurus.

March 2006 Funding with Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.

On March 28, 2006 (the "Closing"), Texaurus entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement ("Securities Purchase Agreement") with Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. ("Laurus"); a Registration Rights Agreement with Laurus ("Registration Rights Agreement"); issued Laurus a Common Stock Purchase Warrant (the "Texaurus Warrant"); entered into a Master Security Agreement with Laurus; sold Laurus a Secured Term Note in the amount of $8,500,000 (the "Note"), and entered into various other agreements described below. Additionally, in connection with the Closing, we issued Laurus a Common Stock Purchase Warrant (the "Texhoma Warrant"), which agreements are described in greater detail below.

SECURED TERM NOTE

The Secured Term Note (the "Note") in the amount of $8,500,000, which was sold by Texaurus to Laurus in connection with the Closing, is due and payable in three years from the Closing on March 27, 2009 (the "Maturity Date"), and bears interest at the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate (the "Prime Rate"), plus two percent (2%) (the "Contract Rate"), based on a 360 day year, payable monthly in arrears, beginning on April 1, 2006, provided however that the Contract Rate shall never be less than eight percent (8%). As of February 6, 2008, the Contract Rate is eight percent (8.00%) per year, with the Prime Rate at six percent (6%) as of February 6, 2008.

-16-

Additionally, the Note provided for principal payments on the funds to be made each month, beginning on June 1, 2006, and continuing up to and including the Maturity Date. The amount of these monthly principal payments is equal to eighty percent (80%) of the gross production revenue received by Texaurus, relating to all oil and gas properties owned by Texaurus, for the prior calendar month, provided that the principal payments shall increase to one hundred percent (100%) of such gross production revenue if an Event of Default occurs (as defined in the Note).

If an Event of Default occurs under the Note, the Note shall bear additional interest in the amount of two percent (2%) per month above the then current interest rate of the Note, until such Event of Default is cured or waived. Additionally, upon the occurrence of and during the continuance of any Event of Default, Laurus can at its option, demand repayment in full of all obligations and liabilities owing by Texaurus to Laurus by way of a default payment equal to 130% of the outstanding principal amount of the Note and any accrued but unpaid interest thereon.

Additionally, we agreed to guaranty the Note and other obligations owing to Laurus pursuant to a Guaranty, the entry into a Master Security Agreement (described below) and the entry into a Stock Pledge Agreement, whereby we pledged 100% of the outstanding stock of Texaurus to Laurus to guarantee the payment and performance of all obligations and indebtedness owed to Laurus by Texaurus.

In connection with the Closing, Texaurus paid Laurus Capital Management, LLC, the manager of Laurus, a closing payment equal to 3.5% of the Note, or $297,500; Energy Capital Advisors, LLC, an advisory fee equal to $495,000; certain amounts paid to various other parties, including our law firm, Laurus' law firm and certain of our advisors; and the $5,225,000 paid for the Kilrush, represented the entire $8,500,000 received in connection with the sale of the Note, as well as $300,000 of the funding provided by our former Executive Chairman and Director, Frank Jacobs.

Additionally, in consideration for advisory services rendered in connection with the Closing, we granted Energy Capital Solutions, LLC, warrants to purchase up to 1,062,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.04 per share. Energy Capital Solutions, LLC's warrants expire if unexercised at 5:00 P.M. C.S.T. on March 28, 2011.

REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT

In connection with the Closing, we entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with Laurus, by which we agreed to file a registration statement covering the shares exercisable in connection with the Texhoma Warrant within sixty (60) days of the date of the Closing, and that such registration statement would be effective within one hundred and eighty (180) days of the Closing date, which registration statement we have been unable to file to date, due to the fact that we are not current in our filings with the Commission. In November 2007, we entered into the First Amendment to Securities Purchase Agreement, Secured Term Note and Registration Rights Agreement with Laurus, to amend the Registration Rights Agreement, which requires us to gain effectiveness of a registration statement covering the shares exercisable in connection with the Texhoma Warrant to April 30, 2008.

TEXAURUS WARRANT

In connection with the Closing, Texaurus issued Laurus the Texaurus Warrant, which provides Laurus the right to purchase up to 961 shares of Texaurus common stock, representing 49% of Texaurus' outstanding common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share. The Texaurus Warrant is exercisable by Laurus at any time after the payment by Texaurus in full of the Note. The Texaurus Warrant will be subject to identical rights to registration as described above in connection with the Texhoma Registration Rights Agreement, when and if Texaurus completes an initial public offering and/or otherwise becomes publicly traded.

-17-

TEXHOMA WARRANT

In addition to the Texaurus Warrant granted to Laurus by Texaurus, at the Closing, we granted Laurus a Common Stock Purchase Warrant (the "Texhoma Warrant"), to purchase up to 10,625,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.04 per share, which if exercised in full would provide us aggregate consideration of $425,000. The Texhoma Warrant expires if unexercised at 5:00 P.M. on March 28, 2011. The Texhoma Warrant contains a provision whereby Laurus is not able to exercise any portion of the Warrant, which exercise would cause it to hold more than 4.99% of our issued and outstanding common stock, unless an Event of Default under the Note has occurred (as described above) and/or if Laurus provides us 75 days prior written notice of their intent to hold greater than 4.99% of our issued and outstanding common stock.

MASTER SECURITY AGREEMENT

To secure the payment of the obligations of Texaurus incurred in connection with the Closing, Texaurus and we entered into a Master Security Agreement with Laurus, whereby Texaurus and we agreed to grant Laurus a continuing security interest in all of our cash, cash equivalents, accounts, accounts receivable, deposit accounts (including the amount in the Restricted Account, as described above), inventory, equipment, goods, fixtures, documents, instruments, contract rights, general intangibles, chattel paper, investment property, letter-of-credit rights, trademarks and applications, patents and applications, copyrights and applications and other intellectual property which Texaurus has or hereafter acquires; the Kilrush Property and any additional properties or interests acquired by Texaurus, as well as certain other interests associated with such properties.

SIDE LETTER AGREEMENT

In connection with the issuance of the Texaurus Warrant, we and Texaurus entered into a "Side Letter Agreement," whereby we and Texaurus agreed that following the exercise of the Texaurus Warrant by Laurus, we and Laurus would negotiate in good faith the terms of a shareholders agreement in connection with Texaurus, which among other things would provide for Laurus' consent to certain actions to be taken by Texaurus or us, including, declaring or paying any dividends, selling or disposing of any assets, entering into any transactions outside of the normal course of business, creating any mortgage, lien, charge or other form of encumbrance with respect to any assets, entering into any agreements with third parties, issuing or selling any capital stock, warrants or convertible securities, or appointing or replacing any outside accountants or auditors.

-18-

Significant Transactions Affected During 2006 and 2007:

On May 31, 2006, Texhoma entered into six (6) participation agreements to purchase various oil and gas leases from Sunray Operating Company LLC.

In June and August 2006, Texhoma closed the purchase of three (3) of the participation agreements, entering into Assignments and Bill of Sales for purchase from Sunray Operating Company LLC (“Sunray”) of the following Leases:

	·	Leases covering approximately 196 acres of land in Brazoria County, Texas. In the purchase, Texhoma acquired an undivided 37.5% interest, subject to existing overriding royalty interests equal to 25% of 8/8. Additionally, Sunray is entitled to a five-eighths of eight-eighths (62.5% of 8/8) working interest, proportionally reduced at payout; and
	·	Leases covering approximately 20 acres of land in Brazoria County, Texas. In the purchase, Texhoma acquired an undivided 35% interest in the leases, subject to existing overriding royalty interests equal to 25% of 8/8.

	·	Leases covering approximately 280 acres of land in Brazoria County, Texas. In the purchase, Texhoma acquired an undivided 72.5% interest in the leases, subject to existing overriding royalty interests equal to 28% of 8/8. Texhoma simultaneously sold a 42.5% interest leaving a 30% interest.
	·	Texhoma declined to participate in the purchase of the leases covering approximately 80 acres in Brazoria County. In September 2006, this well was a dry hole and participation in subsequent wells was declined. However, Texhoma continues to hold a 12.5% back in Working Interest.

Two leases for another 160 acre site and a 60 acre site which were declined by Texhoma and in which we retained a 12.5% back in Working Interest.

We purchased the Leases from Sunray for aggregate consideration of $143,161, of which $113,161 was paid in cash and $30,000 was paid in the form of shares of our common stock, by the issuance of an aggregate of 375,000 units (each a "Unit"), which each include one (1) share of common stock and one (1) warrant, which entitles the holder of such warrant to purchase one (1) share of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.15 per share, prior to the one (1) year anniversary of such warrant grant, which Units were valued at $0.08 per Unit. Approximately $50,000 remained due to Sunray in connection with the purchase of the Leases outstanding as of December 31, 2007.

Upon the closing of the Purchases we and Sunray agreed to enter into an operating agreement in connection with the development of the leases. Additionally, both we and Sunray agreed that should either party be unable or unwilling, for any reason, to participate in the drilling of the initial well on any of the leases described above, the non-participating party shall, at least 90 days prior to any expiration or any rental date under the leases, assign the participating party all of its right, title and interest in such lease.

Letter Agreement

On or about May 15, 2007, we entered into a Letter Agreement with Matrixx Resource Holdings Inc. (“Matrixx”) to sell our 11% working interest in the property known as the Clovelly Prospect (the “Clovelly Prospect”) for $150,000. In connection with and pursuant to the Letter Agreement, we expected to receive an earnest money deposit of $25,000 on or about May 25, 2007, with the remainder of the purchase price to be paid on or before June 30, 2007; however, we have not received any funds or any deposit from Matrixx and the Letter Agreement has been terminated.

Management Services Agreement

On or about May 15, 2007, we entered into a Management Services Agreement with Valeska Energy Corp. (“Valeska”), whose Chief Executive Officer is William M. Simmons, who became an officer and Director of us on or about June 4, 2007, as described below, which was subsequently amended on or about June 1, 2007 (collectively the “Management Agreement”).

Pursuant to the Management Agreement, we agreed to enter into a Joint Venture agreement with Valeska (the “Joint Venture”), described below; Valeska agreed to provide us management services and act as a Management Consultant to us, for a monthly fee of $10,000 (plus expenses), or 15% of any revenue we generate, whichever is greater (excluded from this definition however are asset sales and/or income of a capital nature, and included in the definition are 20% of the revenues we receive from our Joint Venture with Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.); and we also agreed to issue Valeska 15,200,000 restricted shares of our common stock. We also agreed pursuant to the Management Agreement, as amended, that we would issue Valeska an additional 18,200,000 shares of our common stock upon such time as we are able to bring our public reporting requirements current with the Commission and seek reinstatement on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board. These shares will be valued at Fair Market Value using the most appropriate valuation method. The Management Agreement had a minimum term of three months, beginning on May 1, 2007. The Management Services Agreement was later amended and extended by the parties’ entry into the Second Amendment to Management Services Agreement with Valeska Energy Corp. in August, 2007, as described below.

-19-

Joint Venture Agreement

On or about May 15, 2007, we entered into a Joint Venture Relationship Agreement with Valeska (the “Joint Venture Agreement”), pursuant to which we and Valeska agreed to form a new Texas limited partnership (the “Joint Venture”), of which Valeska will serve as general partner. The Joint Venture Agreement contemplates that Valeska will cause funds to be invested, arrange financial and strategic partnerships, and that both parties would bring investment opportunities to the Joint Venture. Pursuant to the Joint Venture Agreement, Valeska has co-investment rights in the Joint Venture. Any distributions from the Joint Venture will be paid first to Valeska and the Company, in an amount equal to 8% to Valeska and 2% to the Company, subject to investor approval; then to any investors as negotiated therewith; and finally Valeska and the Company will share any remaining distributions, with Valeska receiving 80% of such distributions and the Company receiving 20% of such distributions.

The Joint Venture Agreement also provides that Valeska has the right to require us to purchase its interest in the Joint Venture at any time, in exchange for shares of our common stock. In the event that Valeska exercises this right, the valuation of the Joint Venture will be valued in a negotiated manner or at 30% greater than the gross acquisition cost of any property acquired by the Joint Venture, and the number of shares exchangeable for such interest will be equal to the market price of our shares of common stock on the date that such right is exercised by Valeska.

Additionally, we have the right, pursuant to the Joint Venture Agreement, to veto any deal which Valeska proposes to include in the Joint Venture.

Voting Agreement

On or about June 5, 2007, certain of our largest shareholders, including Capersia Pte. Ltd.; Frank A. Jacobs, our former officer and Director; and Valeska Energy, Inc., which is controlled by William M. Simmons, the President and Director of the Company, and is majority owned by Daniel Vesco, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and a Director of the Company, through an entity which he controls (“Valeska” and collectively the “Shareholders”) entered into a Voting Agreement (the “Voting Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Voting Agreement the Shareholders agreed that for the Term of the Voting Agreement, as defined below, no Shareholder would vote any of the shares of common stock (the “Shares”) which they hold for (i.e. in favor of) the removal of William M. Simmons or Daniel Vesco, our Directors (the “New Directors”). The Shareholders also agreed that in the event of any shareholder vote of the Company (either by Board Meeting, a Consent to Action with Meeting, or otherwise) relating to the removal of the New Directors; the re-election of the New Directors; and/or the increase in the number of directors of the Company during the Term of the Voting Agreement, that such Shareholders would vote their Shares against the removal of the New Directors; for the re-election of such New Directors; and/or vote against the increase in the number of directors of the Company, without the unanimous consent of the New Directors, respectively.

The Voting Agreement further provided that in the event that either of the New Directors breaches his fiduciary duty to the Company, including, but not limited to such Director’s conviction of an act or acts constituting a felony or other crime involving moral turpitude, dishonesty, theft or fraud; such Director’s gross negligence in connection with his service to the Company as a Director and/or in any executive capacity which he may hold; and/or if any Shareholder becomes aware of information which would lead a reasonable person to believe that such Director has committed fraud or theft from the Company, or a violation of the Securities laws, the Voting Agreement shall not apply, and the Shareholders may vote their shares as they see fit.

-20-

The Term of the Voting Agreement is until June 5, 2009 (the “Term”). The Shareholders agreed to enter into the Voting Agreement in consideration for the New Directors agreeing to serve the Company as Directors of the Company.

On or about July 12, 2007, another one of our significant shareholders, Lucayan Oil and Gas Investments, Ltd. (“LOGI”), which is 50% owned by Max Maxwell, our former President and Director, entered into a Voting Agreement with us, which was amended by a First Amendment to Voting Agreement, which provided that the shares of common stock held by LOGI would be subject to the identical terms of our June 5, 2007 Voting Agreement with the Shareholders.

Consulting Agreement

Effective July 1, 2007, we entered into a Consulting Agreement with Ibrahim Nafi Onat, our Director (the “Consulting Agreement”), pursuant to which Mr. Onat agreed to serve as our Director and Vice President of Operations for an initial term of twelve (12) months, which term is renewable month to month thereafter with the mutual consent of the parties. Pursuant to the Consulting Agreement we agreed to pay Mr. Onat $2,500 per month during the term of the Consulting Agreement, to issue him 500,000 restricted shares of common stock valued at the market price on the date of issuance, in connection with his entry into the Consulting Agreement and 500,000 restricted shares of common stock assuming he is still employed under the Consulting Agreement at the expiration of six (6) months from the effective date of the Consulting Agreement, which he was, and which shares have been issued to date (the “Six Month Issuance”).

-21-

Material Corporate Events

On July 17, 2007, the Company's Board of Directors unanimously agreed by a written consent to action without a meeting, to adopt a Certificate of Designations for the creation of a Series A preferred stock (the "Series A Preferred Stock").

The Series A Preferred Stock has a par value of $0.001 per share. The Series A Preferred Stock consists of one thousand (1,000) shares, each having no dividend rights, no liquidation preference, and no conversion or redemption rights. However, the one thousand (1,000) shares of Series A Preferred Stock have the right, voting in aggregate, to vote on all shareholder matters equal to fifty-one percent (51%) of the total vote. For example, if there are 10,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock issued and outstanding at the time of a shareholder vote, the holders of Series A Preferred Stock, voting separately as a class, will have the right to vote an aggregate of 10,400,000 shares, out of a total number of 20,400,000 shares voting.

Additionally, the Company shall not adopt any amendments to the Company's Bylaws, Articles of Incorporation, as amended, make any changes to the Certificate of Designations, or effect any reclassification of the Series A Preferred Stock, without the affirmative vote of at least 66-2/3% of the outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock. However, the Company may, by any means authorized by law and without any vote of the holders of shares of Series A Preferred Stock, make technical, corrective, administrative or similar changes to the Certificate of Designations that do not, individually or in the aggregate, adversely affect the rights or preferences of the holders of shares of Series A Preferred Stock.

On or about August 13, 2007, we entered into a Second Amendment to Management Services Agreement with Valeska Energy Corp. (“Valeska” and the “Second Amendment”).

Pursuant to the Second Amendment, we and Valeska agreed to extend the term of the Management Services Agreement until September 30, 2008, and to pay Valeska the following consideration in connection with agreeing to perform the services required by the original Management Services Agreement, and in consideration for allowing Daniel Vesco and William M. Simmons to serve as Directors of the Company, bringing on personnel to assist the Company with the day to day operations of the Company, and help bring the Company current in its filings (the “Services”):

	·	1,000 shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock;
	·	A monthly fee of $20,000 per month during the extended term of the Second Amendment, plus reasonable and actual costs incurred by Valeska (or individuals or designees brought on by Valeska, including lodging, car rental and telephone expenses therewith) in connection with such Services;

	·	10,000,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock; and
	·	60,000,000 options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, which have a cashless exercise provision, are valid for a period of three years from their grant date, and have an exercise price of greater than 110% of the trading price of the Company’s common stock on the Pinksheets on the day of such grant, which exercise price is equal to $0.02 per share.

On or about October 30, 2007, we entered into a Cooperation Agreement and Mutual Release with our former consultant Terje Reiersen (“Reiersen” and the “Reiersen Release”). Pursuant to the Reiersen Release, Reiersen agreed to release us, our current and former officers, agents, directors, servants, attorneys, representatives, successors, employees and assigns from any and all rights, obligations, claims, demands and causes of action in contract or tort, under any federal or state law, whether known or unknown, relating to his services with the Company or the Company in general for any matter whatsoever other than in connection with any claims against any former officers or Directors of the Company, which claims Reiersen assigned to the Company. Reiersen also agreed to cooperate fully with us in connection with any reasonable requests from us for a period of sixty (60) days from the date of the Reiersen Release, that we would not owe him any rights of contribution or indemnification in connection with any services he rendered on our behalf and that we would not owe him any other consideration other than what we agreed to provide him in connection with the Reiersen Release (as described in greater detail below).

In connection with the Reiersen Release, we agreed to pay Reiersen $2,500 within ten (10) business days of the parties entry into the Reiersen Release (which funds have not been paid to date), and issue Reiersen 250,000 restricted shares of our common stock, which shares have not been issued to date within ten (10) days of the parties entry into the Reiersen Release.

-22-

(a)	waive any default which may have occurred as a result of our failure to become current in our filings with the Commission, assuming that we become current in our filings prior to December 15, 2007;

(b)	amend the terms of the Laurus Note to provide that a “Change of Control” of Texaurus under the Note, which requires approval of Laurus, includes any change in Directors such that Daniel Vesco and William M. Simmons are no longer Directors of Texaurus; and

(c)

On or about November 28, 2007, we entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release (the “Jacobs Agreement”) by and between the Company, Frank A. Jacobs, our former officer and Director (“Jacobs”), and Jacobs Oil & Gas Limited, a British Columbia corporation (“JOGL” and collectively with Jacobs, the “Jacobs Parties”), Clover Capital, a creditor of the Company (“Clover”), Capersia Pte. Ltd., a Singapore company and a significant stockholder of the Company (“Capersia”), Peter Wilson, an individual and a former Director of the Company (“Wilson”), and Sterling Grant Capital, Inc., a British Columbia corporation, controlled by Mr. Wilson (“SGC” and collectively with Clover, Capersia and Wilson, the “Non-Jacobs Parties,” and with the Jacobs Parties, the “Interested Parties”). We had various disputes with the Interested Parties relating to the issuances of and transfers of various shares of our common stock and various of the Interested Parties had alleged that we owed them consideration (the “Disputes”). We entered into the Jacobs Agreement to settle the Disputes with the Interested Parties.

In consideration for the Company agreeing to enter into the Jacobs Agreement, the Jacobs Parties agreed to the following terms: the Jacobs Parties would return to the Company for cancellation 5,000,000 of the 7,500,000 shares purchased by Jacobs in March 2006 (the “Jacobs Shares”), which shares have been cancelled to date; all debt owed by Texhoma to the Jacobs Parties, known or unknown, was discharged and forgiven, including the total outstanding amount of the approximately $500,000 Promissory Note owed to Frank A. Jacobs by the Company (the “Jacobs Note”); the Company owes Jacobs no rights to contribution and/or indemnification in connection with Jacobs employment with the Company; Jacobs also certified the accuracy and correctness of the Company’s previously prepared annual and interim financial statements and periodic reports, relating to the time period of his employment from the period ending September 30, 2005 to the period ending March 31, 2007; the Jacobs Parties agreed they have no interest in and will not interfere with the issuance of or any subsequent transfers of shares to or from Lucayan Oil and Gas Investments, Ltd. (the “LOGI Shares”), a Bahamas corporation; Jacobs agreed to use his best efforts to answer the Company’s questions and produce documents in the future regarding operations and financials of the Company; Jacobs agreed that he no longer holds any exercisable options of the Company; the Voting Agreement entered into between various parties in June 2007, including Jacobs, remains in full affect and force against Jacobs; and Jacobs has no interest in any shares other than the aforementioned 2,500,000 shares.

Additionally, in consideration for the Company agreeing to enter into the Jacobs Agreement, the Non-Jacobs Parties agreed to the following terms: any and all debts owed by Texhoma to Clover, which purportedly totaled approximately $60,000, Capersia, which purportedly totaled $60,000 or any of the Non-Jacobs Parties (including approximately $20,000 purportedly owed to Wilson) was discharged and forgiven; the Non-Jacobs Parties agreed that they have no interest in and will not interfere with the issuance of the LOGI Shares; the Voting Agreement remains in full force and effect against Capersia; and in connection with the 30,000,000 shares of Company stock in Capersia’s possession received through Texhoma’s previous purchase of a 40% interest in Black Swan Petroleum Pty. Ltd. (the “Capersia Shares”), Capersia will not transfer shares in excess of 2% of Texhoma’s then outstanding shares in any three (3) month period, until the second anniversary of the Jacobs Agreement.

-23-

Lastly, in consideration for the Jacobs Parties and the Non-Jacobs Parties agreeing to the terms of the agreement, Texhoma agreed to the following terms: Jacobs will retain the remaining 2,500,000 shares of Company stock and Capersia will retain the aforementioned 30,000,000 shares of Company stock free and clear of any claims to such shares by the Company; and JOGL shall retain all rights to the 200,000 shares of Morgan Creek Energy Corp. (“Morgan Creek”) shares held in trust by JOGL as collateral for a promissory note issued to JOGL by the Company (the “Jacobs Note” and “Morgan Creek Shares”), the Company will release all claims to said shares or any additional shares of Morgan Creek that the Company may be due as a result of stock splits or share distributions.

Further, pursuant to the Jacobs Agreement, the Interested Parties agreed to release the Company from any and all rights, obligations, claims, demands and causes of action, known or unknown, asserted or unasserted relating to the Disputes or the Company or its current or former Directors, and the Company agreed to release the Jacobs Parties and the Non-Jacobs Parties from any and all rights, obligations, claims, demands, and causes of action arising from or relating to the Capersia Shares, Jacobs’ employment with the Company, the Jacobs Note, the Jacobs Shares, the Morgan Creek shares, and the LOGI Shares.

As a result of the Jacobs Agreement, the Company was able to settle approximately $640,000 in debt which it purportedly owed to the various Interested Parties and to settle any and all other claims which such parties, in return for the consideration discussed above, which mainly consisted of assigning the rights to the 200,000 shares of Morgan Creek Energy Corp. stock to Frank A. Jacobs, which shares had an approximate value of $92,000 based on the trading price of Morgan Creek Energy Corp.’s common stock on the date of the Jacobs Agreement of $0.46.

Plan of Operations

The Company’s current plan of operations for the next twelve (12) months is to bring the Company current in its filings with the Commission, get the Company’s accounting and controls and procedures in order and work to decrease the Company’s current liabilities.

In connection with our properties, a deal we had in place to sell the Clovelly Field interests fell through, and we are relying on the operators of our other properties regarding the direction of those prospects. To date, all of those operators have indicated that they have no plans to expand their current drilling prospects.

We currently believe that we can continue our operations for approximately the next ninety days with funds raised in June and December 2007, and anticipate needing to raise approximately $300,000 in the next twelve months to pay our current liabilities and maintain our current rate of monthly expenditures, of which there can be no assurance. Additionally, due to the fact that the assets held by Texaurus are not generating the level of revenue as we originally anticipated, we may need to raise additional capital in Texaurus to repay the Laurus Note and/or for working capital purposes in the future, which funds may be raised through the sale of debt and/or equity in Texaurus.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007 COMPARED TO THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006

We reported revenues of $418,000 for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 compared with $478,000 for the quarter ended December 31, 2006, a decrease in revenues of $60,000 from the prior period. These revenues are the result of our interest in various oil and gas properties and as such actual production varies from month to month and quarter to quarter.

We had oil and gas exploration expenses of $238,000 for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, as compared to $107,000 for the quarter ended December 31, 2006. The oil and gas exploration expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2007, included workover and Approval for Expenditures “AFE” expense overruns for two of three properties and the related joint operating costs of the producing properties owned by Texaurus.

Depletion and depreciation for the three months ended December 31, 2007 was $165,000 as compared to $217,000 for the same quarter of 2006, a decrease of $52,000. The reduction in depletion reflects the reduced asset value for the Little White Lakes interest as a result of its impairment and the declining depletion for the properties based upon their declining production lives.

-24-

We incurred $340,000 in general and administrative income for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, which was mainly due to the reduction in previously recorded expenses relating to options granted, based upon the Black Scholes computations and reflects the expiration of options from 2006 to 2007, offset by legal and accounting fees associated with our periodic filings. This income is compared to general and administrative expenses of $246,000 for the same period in 2006, an increase in general and administrative income of $586,000 from the prior period.

In connection with our raising the necessary capital funding to pursue the planned oil and gas purchases we issued stock warrants to new subscribers of our common stock as well and our lenders. Stock accretion expense was computed based upon the Black-Scholes modeling and recorded as warrants were issued. As a result of the continued Black Scholes modeling, we recognized a $90,000 reduction in related stock accretion expense for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as compared with a reduction of expense of $529,000 for the quarter ended December 31, 2006.

We recorded an impairment in our investment in Morgan Creek Energy of $196,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2006 compared with none for the three months ended December 31, 2007 due to the exchange of these shares as a partial release with our former Director, Frank Jacobs, as described above.

In conjunction with the release retained from Mr. Jacobs, we recorded a $370,000 gain on the extinguishment of debt for the three months ended December 31, 2007 as compared with no extinguishment of debt for the same period ended December 31, 2006.

We incurred net interest expense of $276,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2007, in connection with the payment of the Laurus Note as compared with net interest expense of $297,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2006.

We had total other income of $187,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2007, compared to total other income of $40,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2006.

We had net income of $543,000 for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as compared to a net loss of $53,000 for the quarter ended December 31, 2006, an increase in net income of $490,000 from the prior period. The main reasons for the increase in net income were, the increase in general and administrative income in connection with the expiration of previously granted warrants and options, the decrease in depreciation and amortization expense, the increase in gain on extinguishment of debt, and the increase in total other income, offset by the decrease in oil and gas revenue, and the increase in oil and gas exploration expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2007, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2006.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

As of December 31, 2007, we had total assets of $5,264,000, consisting of cash of $68,000, accounts receivable of $301,000, net oil and gas properties of $4,462,000 and other assets of $432,000.

We had current liabilities of $1,318,000, consisting of $565,000 of accounts payable, $453,000 of accrued expenses, $50,000 of notes payable to related parties, and $250,000 of convertible notes payable, relating to the convertible notes sold in November and December 2007 (as described below) and a long term note payable of $7,935,000 at December 31, 2007. Our current liabilities included notes payable due to affiliates of $50,000, which note was payable to MFS Technology.

We had negative working capital of $948,000 and a retained deficit of $14,463,000 at December 31, 2007.

For the three months ended December 31, 2007, cash of $248,000 was provided by our operating activities and we used $71,000 in our investing activities. Cash provided by operating activities consisted mainly of $543,000 of net income, offset by $750,000 of accrued expenses. Cash used in operating activities for the three months ended December 31, 2007, included $71,000 of oil and gas property investments.

We used $372,000 of cash in our financing activities, due to the proceeds of $250,000 from notes payable sold in November and December 2007, the funds used to repay a portion of the note payable to Laurus of $220,000 , the forgiveness of affiliate loans of $403,000, as well as issuances of common stock in exchange for services of $1,500, which was in connection with 250,000 shares of common stock issued to a consultant in connection with such consultant’s entry into a settlement agreement.

-25-

FUNDING TRANSACTIONS:

We raised an aggregate of $297,500 through the sale of 23,800,000 shares of common stock at $0.0125 per share between May and July 2007.

We raised an aggregate of $125,000 through the sale of a convertible note and warrants to an investor in November 2007. The same investor also invested an additional $125,000 on similar terms on or about December 19, 2007.

We have subsequently used the majority of this funding to pay our general and administrative expenses and certain acquisitions including the purchase of the Leases from Sunray and the Management Agreement with Valeska, as described above.

We believe that we do not currently have sufficient funds to repay the interest and principal payments on amortizing payment required on the Secured Term Note with Laurus, through the payment of production payments on the properties owned by Texaurus. We will also need to repay $8,500,000 (minus any payment of principal on the Note which we are able to make through our 80% production payments to Laurus) on March 27, 2009, which funds we do not currently have and which we can provide no assurances will be available when such Note is due.

We have been advised by the petroleum engineer for the Company that the Texaurus assets may require further impairment than the amount which has been recognized. During the year ended September 30, 2006, we recognized an impairment in connection with the estimated future value of the Texaurus assets of $2,682,000. We will update our disclosure regarding any additional impairment in the future when such information is available.

Additionally, to continue our planned oil and gas operations the Company remains reliant on raising further equity funds and our growth and continued operations could be impaired by limitations on our access to the capital markets. In the event that we or Texaurus do not generate the amount of revenues from our oil and gas properties which we anticipate, and/or we or Texaurus decide to purchase additional oil and gas properties and are required to raise additional financing, we may have to raise additional capital and/or scale back our operations which would have a material adverse impact upon our ability to pursue our business plan. There can be no assurance that capital from outside sources will be available, or if such financing is available, it may involve issuing securities senior to our common stock, the common stock of Texaurus or additional shares of the common stock of Texaurus or equity financings which are dilutive to holders of our common stock. In addition, in the event we do not raise additional capital from conventional sources, it is likely that our growth will be restricted and we may need to scale back or curtail implementing our business plan.

We have no current commitments from our officers and Directors or any of our shareholders to supplement our operations or provide us with financing in the future. If we are unable to raise additional capital from conventional sources and/or additional sales of stock in the future, we may be forced to curtail or cease our operations. Even if we are able to continue our operations, the failure to obtain financing could have a substantial adverse effect on our business and financial results.

-26-

RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the following risk factors and other information in our latest annual report on Form 10-KSB before deciding to become a holder of our Common Stock. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business and financial results could be negatively affected to a significant extent.

WE WILL NEED ADDITIONAL FINANCING TO CONTINUE OUR BUSINESS PLAN AND DRILL AND STUDY ADDITIONAL WELLS, WHICH FINANCING, IF WE ARE UNABLE TO RAISE MAY FORCE US TO SCALE BACK OR ABANDON OUR BUSINESS PLAN.

We raised $8,500,000 from the sale of a Secured Term Note to Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. ("Laurus") in March 2006. However, approximately $7,894,235 of the amount borrowed from Laurus was subsequently used to purchase the Intracoastal City property, the interests in the Barnes Creek gas field and the Edgerly field and to pay closing costs and fees in connection with the various funding transactions.

We raised an aggregate of $384,000 through the sale of 4,800,000 units at a price of $0.08 per unit during June through December 2006, which units each included one (1) share of common stock and one (1) one-year warrant to purchase one (1) share of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.15 per share. We raised an aggregate of $297,500 through the sale of 23,800,000 shares of common stock at $0.0125 per share between May and July 2007. We raised an aggregate of $250,000 through the sale of two units consisting of Convertible Promissory Notes with a conversion price of $0.0125 per share, convertible at the option of Purchaser, into the Company’s common stock, and Class A and Class B Warrants to purchase 5,000,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.02 and $0.03 per share, respectively, exercisable for a period of two years from the date of the Subscription Agreement (the “Units”)

We believe that we do not currently have sufficient funds to continue to pay the interest payments required on the Secured Term Note with Laurus, through the payment of production payments on the properties owned by Texaurus on an ongoing basis. As such, we are currently in negotiations with Laurus to amend the terms of the Secured Term Note, which there can be no assurance will be amended. Additionally, we will need to repay $8,500,000 (minus any payment of principal on the Note which we are able to make through our 80% production payments to Laurus) on March 27, 2009, which funds we do not currently have and which we can provide no assurances will be available when such Note is due. As such, if we are unable to come to terms with Laurus regarding the amendment and/or revision of the terms of the Secured Term Note, we will likely not be able to continue our business operations for more than approximately three months. Not including the substantial funds we will require to repay the principal on the Secured Term Note and/or that we will require to make the required interest payments on the Secured Term Note, we will require approximately $300,000 of additional capital to continue our planned oil and gas operations and seek out new acquisitions.

Additionally, as described below, we cannot be sure that we will find any oil and/or gas on our properties in the future, our current properties will continue to produce, our current production will be sufficient to repay the interest (or principal) on the Laurus Note, nor can we provide any assurances that if found, that the oil and/or gas will be in commercial quantities, that we will be able to extract it from the ground, that we will not face liability in connection with our extraction efforts, and/or that we will be able to generate the revenues we expect from the future sale of any oil and gas we may discover in the future.

Finally, we may choose to spend additional monies on the purchases of oil and gas properties in the future. Depending on the decisions of our management, the volatility of the prices of oil and/or gas, our exploration activities, and/or potential liability, and the amount of money we receive from the sale of oil and gas, if any, we may need to raise additional capital substantially faster than six months, which we currently estimate such previously borrowed monies will last. We do not currently have any additional commitments or identified sources of additional capital from third parties or from our officers, directors or majority shareholders . We can provide no assurance that additional financing will be available on favorable terms, if at all. If we are not able to raise the capital necessary to continue our business operations, we may be forced to abandon or curtail our business plan and/or suspend our exploration activities.

BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT THE COMPANY HAS LIABILITIES FAR IN EXCESS OF ITS ASSETS; THE ASSETS OF TEXAURUS HAVE NOT, OVER THE PAST SEVERAL MONTHS, BEEN GENERATING SUFFICIENT REVENUE TO PAY THE ACCRUED INTEREST ON THE LAURUS NOTE OR THE EXPENSES OF TEXAURUS; AND BECAUSE OF THE SIGNIFICANT DOWNWARD PRESSURE ON THE COMPANY’S COMMON STOCK, THE COMPANY’S MANAGEMENT IS CONSIDERING VARIOUS OPTIONS WHICH INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, DEREGISTERING WITH THE SEC, SEEKING INVESTMENT IN TEXAURUS FROM ENTITIES OTHER THAN TEXHOMA AND PURSUING OPPORTUNITIES OUTSIDE AND DISTINCT FROM TEXHOMA.

As of December 31, 2007, the Company had total liabilities of $9,253,064 and total assets of only $5,263,590. The Company does not believe that the Texaurus assets will generate sufficient revenue in the future to enable the Company to repay the Laurus Note. Additionally, over the past several months, the production payments payable to the Company from the Texaurus assets have not been sufficient to pay the accrued interest on the Laurus Note, and the Company can provide no assurances that such production payments will be sufficient to repay the interest on the Laurus Note in the future, and/or that the Company will not be in default of such note. The Company does not believe that it will be able to raise sufficient additional capital through the sale of equity, if at all, as there is downward pressure on the Company’s common stock. Currently, there is significant downward pressure on the Company’s common stock on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board, which the Company believes is making it difficult to create a trading market and preventing it from raising additional funding through equity financings on acceptable terms to the Company. If the Company’s current management believes that the Company will not be able to repay the Laurus Note and/or interest thereon, and/or if the Company’s common stock continues to have significant downward pressure, the Company’s management may choose to pursue opportunities outside of the Company that may be in competition with the Company or impact the Company in a negative manner. If that were to happen, it is possible that the Company would cease filing reports with the Commission and /or the value of the Company’s common stock could become worthless. Additionally, in the future, the Company’s current management may work outside of the company to start a new company with similar operations as the Company if they believe that the Company will not be able to repay the Laurus Note and/or not be able to raise capital on acceptable terms.

WE OWE LAURUS MASTER FUND, LTD., A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF MONEY WHICH WE DO NOT HAVE.

In connection with the Securities Purchase Agreement, Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. ("Laurus"), purchased a $8,500,000 Secured Term Note from Texaurus, which we have guaranteed, and which bears interest at the rate of 8% per year (as of February 6, 2007), which is due and payable on March 27, 2009, and which principal and interest is repayable by way of a production payments equal to 80% of the gross production revenue received by Texaurus in connection with the Intracoastal City Field, the Edgerly and the Barnes Creek Properties.

-27-

There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient funds to pay any principal or interest on the Note when due on March 27, 2009, if such repayment amount is not sufficiently covered by the payment of production proceeds to Laurus, as described above, and we do not currently believe that such production payments will be sufficient to repay such Note or such interest as of the date of this filing. If we do not have sufficient funds to pay the total remaining amount of the Note (after taking into account payments of principal, which we may not have sufficient funds to pay) when due, we will be in default and Laurus may take control of substantially all of our assets (as described in more detail under "Risks Relating to the Company's Securities"). As a result, we will need to raise or otherwise generate approximately $8,500,000 to repay the Note (not including any adjustments for payment of principal in connection with production payments paid by Texaurus) by March 27, 2009. If we fail to raise this money, we could be forced to abandon or curtail our business operations, which could cause any investment in the Company to become worthless.

OUR ESTIMATES OF RESERVES COULD HAVE FLAWS, OR MAY NOT ULTIMATELY TURN OUT TO BE CORRECT OR COMMERCIALLY EXTRACTABLE AND AS A RESULT, OUR FUTURE REVENUES AND PROJECTIONS COULD BE INCORRECT.

Estimates of reserves and of future net revenues prepared by different petroleum engineers may vary substantially depending, in part, on the assumptions made and may be subject to adjustment either up or down in the future. Our actual amounts of production, revenue, taxes, development expenditures, operating expenses, and quantities of recoverable oil and gas reserves may vary substantially from the estimates. Oil and gas reserve estimates are necessarily inexact and involve matters of subjective engineering judgment. In addition, any estimates of our future net revenues and the present value thereof are based on assumptions derived in part from historical price and cost information, which may not reflect current and future values, and/or other assumptions made by us that only represent our best estimates. If these estimates of quantities, prices and costs prove inaccurate, we may be unsuccessful in expanding our oil and gas reserves base with our acquisitions. We have been advised by the petroleum engineer for the Company that the Texaurus assets may require further impairment than the amount which has been recognized. During the year ended September 30, 2006, we recognized an impairment in connection with the estimated future value of the Texaurus assets of $2,682,000. We will update our disclosure regarding any additional impairment in the future when such information is available. Additionally, if declines in and instability of oil and gas prices occur, then additional write downs in the capitalized costs associated with our oil and gas assets may be required. Because of the nature of the estimates of our reserves and estimates in general, we can provide no assurance that additional or further reductions to our estimated proved oil and gas reserves and estimated future net revenues will not be required in the future, and/or that our estimated reserves will be present and/or commercially extractable. If our reserve estimates are incorrect, the value of our common stock could decrease and we may be forced to write down the capitalized costs of our oil and gas properties.

WE RELY HEAVILY ON WILLIAM M. SIMMONS AND DANIEL VESCO, OUR OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS, AND IF THEY WERE TO LEAVE, WE COULD FACE SUBSTANTIAL COSTS IN SECURING SIMILARLY QUALIFIED OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS.

Our success depends upon the personal efforts and abilities of William M. Simmons, our President and Director and Daniel Vesco, our Chief Executive Officer and Director. Our ability to operate and implement our exploration activities is heavily dependent on the continued service of Mr. Simmons and Mr. Vesco and our ability to attract qualified contractors and consultants on an as-needed basis.

We face continued competition for such contractors and consultants, and may face competition for the services of Mr. Simmons and/or Mr. Vesco in the future. We do not have any employment contracts with Mr. Simmons or Mr. Vesco, nor do we currently have any key man insurance on Mr. Simmons or Mr. Vesco. Mr. Simmons and Mr. Vesco are our driving forces and are responsible for maintaining our relationships and operations. We cannot be certain that we will be able to retain Mr. Simmons and Mr. Vesco and/or attract and retain such contractors and consultants in the future. The loss of either Mr. Simmons and Mr. Vesco, or both and/or our inability to attract and retain qualified contractors and consultants on an as-needed basis could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.

-28-

WE HAVE BECOME AWARE THAT SPAM EMAILS REFERENCING THE COMPANY HAVE BEEN DISSEMINATED IN THE PAST, WHICH COULD AFFECT THE MARKET FOR AND/OR THE VALUE OF OUR COMMON STOCK.

It has come to our attention that during the month of October 2006 certain spam-emails, containing false and misleading information about our company, were disseminated over the internet. The spam-emails distributed by third parties that are not associated with the Company or its Officers or Directors have not been authorized, sanctioned or paid for by the Company. We caution investors to review our most recent Form 8-K with the Commission, our official press releases and our periodic filings, which we anticipate filing and amending in the future, before making any investment in us.

While we are not responsible for the dissemination of the spam-emails and are not aware of who was responsible, we were contacted by the Commission and were requested to voluntarily provide shareholder information and disclosures in connection with the origins of the dissemination of such spam emails. The Company cooperated fully with the Commission.

The fact that someone disseminated spam emails about our company and the fact that the Commission previously looked into such emails may be perceived by potential investors as a negative factor which could adversely affect the market for and/or the value of our stock.

BECAUSE OF THE SPECULATIVE NATURE OF OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION, THERE IS SUBSTANTIAL RISK THAT NO ADDITIONAL COMMERCIALLY EXPLOITABLE OIL OR GAS WILL BE FOUND AND THAT OUR BUSINESS WILL FAIL.

The search for commercial quantities of oil as a business is extremely risky. We cannot provide investors with any assurance that our properties contain commercially exploitable quantities of oil and/or gas.

The exploration expenditures to be made by us may not result in the discovery of commercial quantities of oil and/or gas and problems such as unusual or unexpected formations and other conditions involved in oil and gas exploration, and often result in unsuccessful exploration efforts. If we are unable to find commercially exploitable quantities of oil and gas, and/or we are unable to commercially extract such quantities, we may be forced to abandon or curtail our business plan, and as a result, any investment in us may become worthless.

OUR TOTAL AMOUNT OF ISSUED AND OUTSTANDING SHARE AMOUNTS MAY BE INCORRECT, AND WE MAY HAVE OUTSTANDING SHARES WHICH ARE UNACCOUNTED FOR.

We have become aware of a subscription agreement relating to the sale of certain shares of our common stock in February 2005, which shares have not been issued to date, and which subscription agreement we have been unable to verify as of the date of this filing. As a result of the subscription agreement, and our previous failure to issue shares in connection with such subscription agreement, we may have potential liability for such shareholders loss of liquidity and/or the decline in the value of our common stock. Additionally, there may be other subscription agreements which we are not aware of relating to the sale of our common stock, which sales and issuances are not currently reflected with our Transfer Agent and/or in the number of outstanding shares of common stock disclosed throughout this report. As a result, we may have a larger number of shares outstanding than we currently show on our shareholders list. This difference, if present, may force us to revise our filings and/or may mean that the ownership percentage of certain shares of common stock disclosed throughout this report is incorrect. If we are required to issue additional shares of common stock in the future relating to previous subscription agreements which our current management was and/or is not aware, it could cause substantial dilution to our existing shareholders and/or we could face potential liability in connection with our failure to issue such shares when originally subscribed.

-29-

BECAUSE OF THE INHERENT DANGERS INVOLVED IN OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION, THERE IS A RISK THAT WE MAY INCUR LIABILITY OR DAMAGES AS WE CONDUCT OUR BUSINESS OPERATIONS, WHICH COULD FORCE US TO EXPEND A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF MONEY IN CONNECTION WITH LITIGATION AND/OR A SETTLEMENT.

The oil and natural gas business involves a variety of operating hazards and risks such as well blowouts, pipe failures, casing collapse, explosions, uncontrollable flows of oil, natural gas or well fluids, fires, spills, pollution, releases of toxic gas and other environmental hazards and risks. These hazards and risks could result in substantial losses to us from, among other things, injury or loss of life, severe damage to or destruction of property, natural resources and equipment, pollution or other environmental damage, cleanup responsibilities, regulatory investigation and penalties and suspension of operations. In addition, we may be liable for environmental damages caused by previous owners of property purchased and leased by us. As a result, substantial liabilities to third parties or governmental entities may be incurred, the payment of which could reduce or eliminate the funds available for exploration, development or acquisitions or result in the loss of our properties and/or force us to expend substantial monies in connection with litigation or settlements. As such, there can be no assurance that any insurance obtained by us will be adequate to cover any losses or liabilities. We cannot predict the availability of insurance or the availability of insurance at premium levels that justify our purchase. The occurrence of a significant event not fully insured or indemnified against could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and operations. We may elect to self-insure if management believes that the cost of insurance, although available, is excessive relative to the risks presented. In addition, pollution and environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. The occurrence of an event not fully covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations, which could lead to any investment in us becoming worthless.

WE REQUIRE SUBSTANTIAL ADDITIONAL FINANCING TO CONTINUE OUR EXPLORATION AND DRILLING ACTIVITIES, WHICH FINANCING IS OFTEN HEAVILY DEPENDENT ON THE CURRENT MARKET PRICE FOR OIL AND GAS, WHICH WE ARE UNABLE TO PREDICT.

Our growth and continued operations could be impaired by limitations on our access to capital markets. If the market for oil and/or gas were to weaken for an extended period of time, our ability to raise capital would be substantially reduced. There can be no assurance that capital from outside sources will be available, or that if such financing is available, that it will not involve issuing securities senior to the common stock or equity financings which will be dilutive to holders of common stock. Such issuances, if made, would likely cause a decrease in the value of our common stock.

THE MARKET FOR OIL AND GAS IS INTENSELY COMPETITIVE, AND AS SUCH, COMPETITIVE PRESSURES COULD FORCE US TO ABANDON OR CURTAIL OUR BUSINESS PLAN.

The market for oil and gas exploration services is highly competitive, and we only expect competition to intensify in the future. Numerous well-established companies are focusing significant resources on exploration and are currently competing with us for oil and gas opportunities. Additionally, there are numerous companies focusing their resources on creating fuels and/or materials which serve the same purpose as oil and gas, but are manufactured from renewable resources. As a result, there can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully or that competitive pressures will not adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. If we are not able to successfully compete in the marketplace, we could be forced to curtail or even abandon our current business plan, which could cause any investment in us to become worthless.

WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY MANAGE OUR GROWTH, WHICH COULD LEAD TO OUR INABILITY TO IMPLEMENT OUR BUSINESS PLAN.

Our growth is expected to place a significant strain on our managerial, operational and financial resources, especially considering that we currently only have three Directors and a small number of executive officers and employees. Further, as we enter into additional contracts, we will be required to manage multiple relationships with various consultants, businesses and other third parties. These requirements will be exacerbated in the event of our further growth or in the event that the number of our drilling and/or extraction operations increases. There can be no assurance that our systems, procedures and/or controls will be adequate to support our operations or that our management will be able to achieve the rapid execution necessary to successfully implement our business plan. If we are unable to manage our growth effectively, our business, results of operations and financial condition will be adversely affected, which could lead to us being forced to abandon or curtail our business plan and operations.

-30-

THE PRICE OF OIL AND NATURAL GAS HAS HISTORICALLY BEEN VOLATILE AND IF IT WERE TO DECREASE SUBSTANTIALLY, OUR PROJECTIONS, BUDGETS, AND REVENUES WOULD BE ADVERSELY EFFECTED, AND WE WOULD LIKELY BE FORCED TO MAKE MAJOR CHANGES IN OUR OPERATIONS.

Our future financial condition, results of operations and the carrying value of our oil and natural gas properties depend primarily upon the prices we receive for our oil and natural gas production. Oil and natural gas prices historically have been volatile and likely will continue to be volatile in the future, especially given current world geopolitical conditions. Our cash flows from operations are highly dependent on the prices that we receive for oil and natural gas. This price volatility also affects the amount of our cash flows available for capital expenditures and our ability to borrow money or raise additional capital. The prices for oil and natural gas are subject to a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control. These factors include:

o the level of consumer demand for oil and natural gas;

o the domestic and foreign supply of oil and natural gas;

o the ability of the members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") to agree to and maintain oil price and production controls;

o the price of foreign oil and natural gas;

o domestic governmental regulations and taxes;

o the price and availability of alternative fuel sources;

o weather conditions;

o market uncertainty due to political conditions in oil and natural gas producing regions, including the Middle East; and

o worldwide economic conditions.

These factors as well as the volatility of the energy markets generally make it extremely difficult to predict future oil and natural gas price movements with any certainty. Declines in oil and natural gas prices would not only reduce our revenue, but could reduce the amount of oil and natural gas that we can produce economically and, as a result, could have a material adverse effect upon our financial condition, results of operations, oil and natural gas reserves and the carrying values of our oil and natural gas properties. If the oil and natural gas industry experiences significant price declines, we may be unable to make planned expenditures, among other things. If this were to happen, we may be forced to abandon or curtail our business operations, which would cause the value of an investment in us to decline in value, or become worthless.

OUR OPERATIONS ARE HEAVILY DEPENDENT ON CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS, WHICH WE ARE UNABLE TO PREDICT, AND WHICH MAY CHANGE IN THE FUTURE, CAUSING US TO EXPEND SUBSTANTIAL ADDITIONAL CAPITAL.

Public interest in the protection of the environment has increased dramatically in recent years. Our oil and natural gas production and our processing, handling and disposal of hazardous materials, such as hydrocarbons and naturally occurring radioactive materials (if any) are subject to stringent regulation. We could incur significant costs, including cleanup costs resulting from a release of hazardous material, third-party claims for property damage and personal injuries fines and sanctions, as a result of any violations or liabilities under environmental or other laws. Changes in or more stringent enforcement of environmental laws could force us to expend additional operating costs and capital expenditures to stay in compliance.

-31-

Various federal, state and local laws regulating the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, directly impact oil and gas exploration, development and production operations, and consequently may impact our operations and costs. These regulations include, among others, (i) regulations by the Environmental Protection Agency and various state agencies regarding approved methods of disposal for certain hazardous and non-hazardous wastes; (ii) the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and analogous state laws which regulate the removal or remediation of previously disposed wastes (including wastes disposed of or released by prior owners or operators), property contamination (including groundwater contamination), and remedial plugging operations to prevent future contamination; (iii) the Clean Air Act and comparable state and local requirements which may result in the gradual imposition of certain pollution control requirements with respect to air emissions from our operations; (iv) the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 which contains numerous requirements relating to the prevention of and response to oil spills into waters of the United States; (v) the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act which is the principal federal statute governing the treatment, storage and disposal of hazardous wastes; and (vi) state regulations and statutes governing the handling, treatment, storage and disposal of naturally occurring radioactive material.

Management believes that we are in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations. To date, we have not expended any material amounts to comply with such regulations, and management does not currently anticipate that future compliance will have a materially adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, if we are deemed to not be in compliance with applicable environmental laws, we could be forced to expend substantial amounts to be in compliance, which would have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition. If this were to happen, any investment in us could be lost.

THE COMPANY HAS ESTABLISHED PREFERRED STOCK WHICH CAN BE DESIGNATED BY THE COMPANY'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS WITHOUT SHAREHOLDER APPROVAL AND HAS ESTABLISHED SERIES A PREFERRED STOCK, WHICH GIVES THE HOLDERS MAJORITY VOTING POWER OVER THE COMPANY.

The Company has 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized, and 1,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock authorized. Shares of preferred stock of the Company may be issued from time to time in one or more series, each of which shall have distinctive designation or title as shall be determined by the Board of Directors of the Company ("Board of Directors") prior to the issuance of any shares thereof. The preferred stock shall have such voting powers, full or limited, or no voting powers, and such preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights and such qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof as adopted by the Board of Directors. Because the Board of Directors is able to designate the powers and preferences of the preferred stock without the vote of a majority of the Company's shareholders, shareholders of the Company will have no control over what designations and preferences the Company's preferred stock will have. As a result of this, the Company's shareholders may have less control over the designations and preferences of the preferred stock and as a result the operations of the Company.

THE COMPANY HAS ESTABLISHED SERIES A PREFERRED STOCK, WHICH GIVES THE HOLDERS MAJORITY VOTING POWER OVER THE COMPANY.

The Company has 1,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock authorized. All outstanding shares of Series A Preferred stock, which are all currently held by Valeska Energy Corp., the beneficial owner of which is William M. Simmons, the President and Director of the Company, can vote in aggregate on all shareholder matters equal to fifty-one percent (51%) of the total vote. Because of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Valeska Energy Corp., will effectively exercise voting control over the Company. As a result of this, the Company's shareholders will have less control over the operations of the Company.

WILLIAM M. SIMMONS, OUR PRESIDENT CAN EXERCISE VOTING CONTROL OVER CORPORATE DECISIONS.

William M. Simmons (through his personal beneficial ownership and through his voting control over Valeska Energy Corp. (“Valeska”)) beneficially owns 27,200,000 shares of common stock, additionally; Valeska holds all 1,000 shares of our outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock, which Series A Preferred Stock, votes in aggregate, a number of voting shares equal to 51% of our total outstanding shares of voting stock. As a result, our Directors and officers will exercise control in determining the outcome of all corporate transactions or other matters, including the election of directors, mergers, consolidations, the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, and also the power to prevent or cause a change in control. The interests of Mr. Simmons may differ from the interests of the other stockholders and thus result in corporate decisions that are adverse to other shareholders.

-32-

THE REMOVAL OF MR. VESCO AND MR. SIMMONS AS DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY IS PROTECTED BY VOTING AGREEMENTS ENTERED INTO WITH THE COMPANY’S MAJORITY SHAREHOLDERS.

Certain of the Company’s majority shareholders, including Capersia Pte. Ltd., Lucayan Oil and Gas Investments, Ltd., Frank A. Jacobs (the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer and Director) and Valeska Energy Corp. (the “Voting Shareholders”) entered into Voting Agreements whereby they agreed that they would not vote the aggregate of 71,874,000 shares of common stock which they hold for (i.e. in favor of) the removal of Mr. Simmons or Mr. Vesco (the “New Directors”) until the expiration of the agreements on June 5, 2009. The Voting Shareholders also agreed that in the event of any shareholder vote of the Company (either by Board Meeting, a Consent to Action without Meeting, or otherwise) relating to the removal of the New Directors; the re-election of the New Directors; and/or the increase in the number of directors of the Company during the term of the Voting Agreements, that such Voting Shareholders would vote their shares against the removal of the New Directors; for the re-election of such New Directors; and/or vote against the increase in the number of directors of the Company, without the unanimous consent of the New Directors, respectively. The Voting Agreements also included a provisions whereby in the event that either of the New Directors breaches his fiduciary duty to the Company, including, but not limited to such New Director’s conviction of an act or acts constituting a felony or other crime involving moral turpitude, dishonesty, theft or fraud; such New Director’s gross negligence in connection with his service to the Company as a Director and/or in any executive capacity which he may hold; and/or if any Voting Shareholder becomes aware of information which would lead a reasonable person to believe that such New Director has committed fraud or theft from the Company, or a violation of the Securities laws (each a “Breach of Fiduciary Duty”), this voting requirement set forth above shall not apply. As a result of the Voting Agreements, it will likely be impossible for the shareholders of the Company to remove Mr. Simmons or Mr. Vesco as Directors of the Company, unless a Breach of Fiduciary Duty occurs, and even then, due to Valeska’s ownership of the Series A Preferred Stock (as described above), it will likely be impossible for such New Directors to be removed as Directors of the Company.

THE INTERESTS OF MR. SIMMONS AND MR. VESCO, OUR PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, RESPECTIVELY, MAY DIFFER FROM THE INTERESTS OF OUR OTHER SHAREHOLDERS, AND THEY MAY ALSO COMPETE WITH THE COMPANY OR ENTER INTO TRANSACTIONS SEPARATE FROM THE COMPANY.

Mr. Simmons and Mr. Vesco, our President and Chief Executive Officer, respectively, are involved in business interests separate from their involvement with the Company, including but not limited to Valeska Energy Corp., which business and/or companies may also operate in the oil and gas industry similar to and/or in competition with the Company. Mr. Simmons and Mr. Vesco are under no obligation to include us in any transactions which they undertake. As a result, we may not benefit from connections they make and/or agreements they enter into while employed by us, and they, or companies they are associated with, including, but not limited to Valeska, may profit from transactions which they undertake while we do not. As a result, they may find it more lucrative or beneficial to cease serving as officers or Directors of the Company in the future and may resign from the Company at that time. Furthermore, while employed by us, shareholders should keep in mind that they are under no obligation to share their contacts and/or enter into favorable contracts and/or agreements they may come across with the Company, and as a result may choose to enter into such contracts or agreements through companies which they own, which are not affiliated with us, and from which we will receive no benefit. Finally, certain of the agreements they may enter into on our behalf may benefit them more than us, including, but not limited to the Management Agreement, which currently pays Valeska $20,000 per month.

-33-

RISKS RELATING TO THE COMPANY'S SECURITIES

A DEFAULT BY US UNDER THE SECURED TERM NOTE, TEXHOMA WARRANT OR TEXAURUS WARRANT, WOULD ENABLE LAURUS MASTER FUND, LTD., TO TAKE CONTROL OF SUBSTANTIALLY ALL OF OUR ASSETS.

The Secured Term Note, Texhoma Warrant and Texaurus Warrant, are secured by Laurus by a continuing security interest in all of our assets, including without limitation, our cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable, deposit accounts, inventory, equipment, goods, fixtures and other tangible and intangible assets, which we own or at any time in the future may acquire rights, title or interest to. As a result, if we default under any provision of the Note, Texhoma Warrant or Texaurus Warrant or we fail to pay any amounts due to Laurus, Laurus may take control of substantially all of our assets. If this were to happen, we could be left with no revenue producing assets, and the value of our common stock could become worthless.

WE MAY BE REQUIRED TO PAY PENALTIES TO LAURUS MASTER FUND, LTD. UNDER THE REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT, WHICH COULD FORCE US TO EXPEND A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF THE MONEY WE HAVE PREVIOUSLY RAISED.

We granted Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., registration rights to the shares issuable to Laurus in connection with the Texhoma Warrant, pursuant to a Registration Rights Agreement, and we plan to register such shares pursuant to a Form SB-2 Registration Statement, once we become current in our filings with the Commission. We agreed pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement to use our best efforts to file the Registration Statement by May 29, 2006 (60 days after the Closing) and to obtain effectiveness of such registration statement by September 25, 2006 (180 days after the Closing), neither of which deadlines we have met; however, pursuant to the First Amendment (described above), Laurus agreed to amend the date we are required to have gained effectiveness of the Registration Statement by, to April 30, 2008. Moving forward, should we fail to obtain effectiveness of the registration statement, and such failure is deemed to be a default under the Note, we could be forced to pay penalties to Laurus. As a result, we could be forced to abandon or scale back our current planned operations and/or raise additional capital, which could cause substantial dilution to our existing shareholders.

THE TEXHOMA WARRANT CONTAINS PROVISIONS WHEREBY LAURUS MASTER FUND, LTD. MAY HOLD MORE THAN 4.99% OF OUR COMMON STOCK, PROVIDED THEY PROVIDE US SEVENTY-FIVE (75) DAYS NOTICE OR AN EVENT OF DEFAULT OCCURS.

Although Laurus may not exercise its Texhoma Warrant if such exercise would cause it to own more than 4.99% of our outstanding common stock, the Texhoma Warrant also contains provisions which provide for the 4.99% limit to be waived provided that Laurus provides us with 75 days notice of its intent to hold more than 4.99% of our common stock or upon the occurrence of an event of default (as defined under the Note). As a result, if we receive 75 days notice from Laurus and/or an event of default occurs, Laurus may fully exercise the Texhoma Warrant and fully convert the Texhoma Warrant into shares of our common stock. If this were to happen, it would cause immediate and substantial dilution to our existing shareholders and if it were to happen when our Registration Statement covering Laurus' securities has been declared effective, the subsequent sale of such shares in the marketplace, if affected, could cause the trading value of our common stock, if any, to decrease substantially.

IF AN EVENT OF DEFAULT OCCURS UNDER THE NOTE, TEXHOMA WARRANT OR TEXAURUS WARRANT OR ANY OF THE RELATED AGREEMENTS, WE COULD BE FORCED TO IMMEDIATELY PAY THE AMOUNTS DUE UNDER THE NOTE.

The Secured Term Note, Texhoma Warrant and Texaurus Warrant include provisions whereby Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., may make the amounts outstanding under the Note due and payable if an event of default occurs under the Note, which events of default include:

our failure to pay amounts due under the Note;

breach of any covenants under the Note, if not cured in the time periods provided;

-34-

breach of any warranties found in the Note;

the occurrence of any default under any agreement, which causes any contingent obligation to become due prior to its stated maturity or to become payable;

any change or occurrence likely to have a material adverse effect on the business, assets, liabilities, financial condition, our operations or prospects;

an indictment or other proceedings against us or any executive officer; or

a breach by us of any provision of the Securities Purchase Agreement, or any other Related Agreement entered into in connection with the sale of the Notes.

If any event of default were to occur under the Note and Laurus was to make the entire amount of the Note immediately due and payable, and we did not have sufficient funds on hand to pay such amounts, we could be forced to sell some or all of our assets at less than fair market value, and/or abandon or curtail our business plan and operations.

THE ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK IN CONNECTION WITH THE EXERCISE OF THE TEXHOMA WARRANT WILL CAUSE IMMEDIATE AND SUBSTANTIAL DILUTION.

Once we are able to file a registration statement covering the shares of common stock issuable in connection with the exercise of the Texhoma Warrant, which we do not anticipate being able to file until such time as we are current in our filings, the issuance of common stock upon exercise of the Texhoma Warrant will result in immediate and substantial dilution to the interests of other stockholders since Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., may ultimately receive and sell the full amount issuable on exercise of the Texhoma Warrant, which has an exercise price of $0.04 per share, currently more than the average trading value of our common stock during the past thirty days. Although Laurus may not exercise its warrant if such conversion or exercise would cause it to own more than 4.99% of our outstanding common stock (unless Laurus provides us 75 days notice and/or an event of default occurs, this restriction does not prevent Laurus from exercising some of its holdings, selling those shares, and then converting the rest of its holdings, while still staying below the 4.99% limit. In this way, Laurus could sell more than this limit while never actually holding more shares than this limit prohibits. If Laurus chooses to do this, it will likely cause the value of our common stock to decline in value (if such common stock is trading at more than $0.04 per share prior to such sales) and will likely also cause substantial dilution to our common stock.

THE MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK MAY CONTINUE TO BE VOLATILE, ILLIQUID AND SPORADIC, IF WE HAVE A MARKET AT ALL.

The market for our common stock on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board (and prior to that on the Pinksheets) has historically been volatile, illiquid and sporadic and is subject to wide fluctuations in response to several factors, including, but not limited to:

	(1)	actual or anticipated variations in our results of operations;
	(2)	our ability or inability to generate new revenues;
	(3)	increased competition; and
	(4)	conditions and trends in the oil and gas exploration industry and the market for oil and gas and petroleum based products.

Our common stock is traded on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board under the symbol "TXHE." In recent years, the stock market in general has experienced extreme price fluctuations that have oftentimes been unrelated to the operating performance of the affected companies. Similarly, the market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly based upon factors unrelated or disproportionate to our operating performance. These market fluctuations, as well as general economic, political and market conditions, such as recessions, interest rates or international currency fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

-35-

INVESTORS MAY FACE SIGNIFICANT RESTRICTIONS ON THE RESALE OF OUR COMMON STOCK DUE TO FEDERAL REGULATIONS OF PENNY STOCKS.

Our common stock will be subject to the requirements of Rule 15(g)9, promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act as long as the price of our common stock is below $4.00 per share. Under such rule, broker-dealers who recommend low-priced securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors must satisfy special sales practice requirements, including a requirement that they make an individualized written suitability determination for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's consent prior to the transaction. The Securities Enforcement Remedies and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990, also requires additional disclosure in connection with any trades involving a stock defined as a penny stock. Generally, the Commission defines a penny stock as any equity security not traded on an exchange or quoted on NASDAQ that has a market price of less than $4.00 per share. The required penny stock disclosures include the delivery, prior to any transaction, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated with it. Such requirements could severely limit the market liquidity of the securities and the ability of purchasers to sell their securities in the secondary market. In addition, various state securities laws impose restrictions on transferring "penny stocks" and as a result, investors in the common stock may have their ability to sell their shares of the common stock impaired.

Other Considerations

There are numerous factors that affect our business and the results of its operations. Sources of these factors include general economic and business conditions, federal and state regulation of business activities, the level of demand for the Company’s product or services, the level and intensity of competition in the industry and the pricing pressures that may result, the Company’s ability to develop new services based on new or evolving technology and the market’s acceptance of those new services, the Company’s ability to timely and effectively manage periodic product transitions, and geographic sales mix of any particular period, and the ability to continue to improve infrastructure including personnel and systems, to keep pace with the growth in its overall business activities.

-36-

Item 3. Controls and Procedures.

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Our Chief Executive and Principal Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our "disclosure controls and procedures" (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the "Evaluation Date"), have concluded that as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our controls were not effective because we failed to complete the required audit of Black Swan in compliance with GAAP, and failed to file our 2005, 2006 and 2007 quarterly and annual reports.

Moving forward, our current management intends to allocate sufficient resources to allow us to timely file our periodic and current reports with the Commission.

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal year reported by this Form 10-QSB, that materially affected, or were reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

-37-

PART II – Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

Management of the Company is not aware of any legal proceedings contemplated by any governmental authority or other party involving the Company or its subsidiaries or its properties other than those described below. No director, officer or affiliate of the Company is (i) a party adverse to the Company in any legal proceedings; or (ii) has an adverse interest to the Company in any legal proceedings. Management is not aware of any other legal proceedings pending or that have been threatened against the Company, its subsidiaries or its properties, other than those described below.

The Company has been threatened with arbitration by ORX Resources, Inc. in connection with funds which ORX believes it is due in connection with fees and expenses owed by the Company in connection with the Clovelly Joint Venture. Our former President and Director, Max Maxwell, formerly served as Vice President and Director of ORX. ORX has not filed any formal proceeding against the Company, and the Company hopes to work with ORX to settle this matter and avoid any formal legal proceedings.

Matrixx Resource Holdings Inc. (“Matrixx”) claims the Company owes it approximately $60,000 in connection with funds that it paid for a backend interest in two of the Company’s wells on its Manville property, which wells were eventually found to be dry. The Company believes however, that it does not owe Matrixx the return of any funds in connection with such payments, as the wells were dry and as such there was no interest to transfer to Matrixx. In addition, the Company believes that Matrixx owes it approximately $16,000 in connection with additional fees and expenses which were paid by the Company, but attributable to Matrixx’s interest, and which were in addition to the $60,000 previously paid by Matrixx. While the parties are currently in discussions regarding such debt and we have been threatened with litigation by Matrixx, neither the Company nor Matrixx has filed any formal legal proceedings in connection with such debts to date.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

On or about November 28, 2007, we entered into a Subscription Agreement with Pagest Services SA, a Swiss Company, pursuant to which we agreed to sell two units consisting of $125,000 in Convertible Promissory Notes with a conversion price of $0.0125 per share, convertible at the option of Purchaser, into the Company’s common stock, and Class A and Class B Warrants to purchase 5,000,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.02 and $0.03 per share, respectively, exercisable for a period of two years from the date of the Subscription Agreement (the “Units”). One Unit was sold immediately to the Purchaser, and one Unit was sold to Purchaser shortly after December 15, 2007. The Convertible Promissory Notes bear interest at the rate of 2% per annum, until paid in full, which amount will increase to 15% per annum, upon the occurrence of an Event of Default (as defined in the Convertible Promissory Notes). The Convertible Promissory Notes are due on the first anniversary of the date they are sold, with the first $125,000 in Convertible Promissory Notes being due on November 28, 2008, and the second on December 19, 2008, unless converted into shares of our common stock. In the event that our common stock trades on the market or exchange on which it then trades, at a trading price of more than $0.02 per share, for any 10 day trading period, the Convertible Promissory Note will automatically convert into shares of our common stock at the rate of one share for each $0.0125 owed to the subscriber. We also agreed to provide the subscriber piggy-back subscription rights in connection with the sale of the Units. We claim an exemption from registration afforded by Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended ("Regulation S") for the above issuances since the issuances were made to a non-U.S. person (as defined under Rule 902 section (k)(2)(i) of Regulation S), pursuant to an offshore transaction, and no directed selling efforts were made in the United States by us, a distributor, any respective affiliates, or any person acting on behalf of any of the foregoing.

In January 2008, Ibrahim Nafi Onat, our Director vested an aggregate of 500,000 shares of our restricted common stock, pursuant to the terms of his Consulting Agreement, which shares have been earned and are included in the number of issued and outstanding shares disclosed throughout this report, but which have not been physically issued to date. We claim an exemption from registration afforded by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, for the above issuance, since the issuance did not involve a public offering, the recipient took the securities for investment and not resale and the Company took appropriate measures to restrict transfer. No underwriters or agents were involved in the issuance and no underwriting discounts or commissions were paid by the Company.

-38-

In January 2008, we cancelled 5,000,000 shares of common stock originally held by Frank Jacobs, our former officer and Director, pursuant to the Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release entered into in November 2007, as described in greater detail above.

In January 2008, we issued an aggregate of 18,200,000 restricted shares of common stock to Valeska in consideration for Valeska reaching certain goals pursuant to the Management Services Agreement, including us becoming current in our periodic reporting requirements and trading our common stock on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board. We claim an exemption from registration afforded by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, for the above issuance, since the issuance did not involve a public offering, the recipient took the securities for investment and not resale and the Company took appropriate measures to restrict transfer. No underwriters or agents were involved in the issuance and no underwriting discounts or commissions were paid by the Company.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

Note.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

None.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.

Exhibit Number	Description of Exhibit

3.1(t)	Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation increasing the authorized shares of common stock to 300,000,000 shares

3.2(13)	Series A Preferred Stock Designation

10.1(1)	Sale and Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 20, 2006, by and between Sterling Grant Capital Inc. and Texhoma Energy, Inc.

10.2(1)	Letter Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2005 by and between Pacific Spinner Limited and Texhoma Energy, Inc.

10.3(2)	Sales and Purchase Agreement with Structured Capital Corp.

10.4(2)	Sales & Purchase Agreement with Kilrush Petroleum

10.5(2)	Securities Purchase Agreement


10.6(2)	Secured Term Note

10.7(2)	Warrant Agreement (Texaurus)

10.8(2)	Warrant Agreement (Texhoma)

10.9(2)	Registration Rights Agreement

10.10(2)	Stock Pledge Agreement

10.11(2)	Side Letter Agreement

-39-

10.12(2)	Guaranty of Texaurus

10.13(2)	Personal Guaranty of Frank Jacobs

10.14(2)	Warrant with Energy Capital Solutions, LLC

10.15(2)	Frank Jacobs Subscription Agreement

10.16(5)	Sales and Purchase Agreement with Structured Capital Corp.
10.17(6)	First Amendment to Sales and Purchase Agreement

10.18(6)	Mortgage, Security Agreement, Finance Statement and Assignment of Production

10.19(6)	Collateral Assignment

10.16(7)	Debt Conversion Agreement with Lucayan Oil and Gas Investments, Ltd.

10.17(7)	Note with Lucayan Oil and Gas Investments, Ltd.

10.18(8)	Promissory Note to Frank Jacobs

10.19(8)	Security Agreement with Frank Jacobs

10.20(10)	Letter Agreement with Matrixx Resource Holdings Inc. regarding the sale of the Clovelly Prospect

10.21(11)	Agreement Regarding Frank A. Jacobs’ Note

10.22(11)	Joint Venture Relationship Agreement

10.23(11)	Management Services Agreement with Valeska and Amendment thereto

10.24(12)	Jacobs Oil & Gas Limited Promissory Note

10.25(13)	Voting Agreement

10.26(13)	Voting Agreement with LOGI

10.27(13)	First Amendment to Voting Agreement with LOGI

10.28(13)	Cooperation Agreement and Mutual Release

-40-


10.28(13)	Consulting Agreement with Ibrahim Nafi Onat

10.29(14)	Promissory Note and Security Agreement with Polaris

10.30(16)	Second Amendment to Management Services Agreement

10.31(17)	Option Agreement

10.32(18)	Cooperation Agreement and Mutual Release with Terje Reiersen

10.33(18)	First Amendment to Securities Purchase Agreement, Secured Term Note and Registration Rights Agreement with Laurus

10.34(19)	Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release

31.1*	Certificate of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1*	Certificate of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

* Filed herewith.

(t)	Filed as an exhibit to our Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on September 22, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.

(1)	Filed as exhibits to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on February 14, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.

(2)	Filed as exhibits to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 4, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.

(3)	Filed as an exhibit to our Form 8-K filing, filed with the Commission on April 5, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.

(4)	Filed as an exhibit to our Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.

(5)	Filed as an exhibit to our Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on April 4, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.

(6)	Filed as exhibits to our Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on April 26, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.

(7)	Filed as exhibits to our Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on May 24, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.

(8)	Filed as exhibits to our Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on February 13, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.

(9)	Filed as an exhibit to our Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on June 21, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.

(10)	Filed as an exhibit to our Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on May 25, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.

(11)	Filed as an exhibit to our Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on June 8, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.

(12)	Filed as an exhibit to our Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on October 20, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.

(13)	Filed as an exhibit to our Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on July 30, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.

(14)	Filed as an exhibit to our Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on June 13, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.

(15)	Filed as an exhibit to our Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on May 17, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference.

(16)	Filed as an exhibit to our Form 10-KSB, filed with the Commission on August 21, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.

-41-

(17)	Filed as an exhibit to our Form 10-QSB, filed with the Commission on September 11, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.

(18)	Filed as an exhibit to our Form 10-KSB, filed with the Commission on November 9, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.

(19)	Filed as an exhibit to our Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on December 12, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.

b) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

We filed the following reports on Form 8-K during the period covered by this Report:

On December 6, 2007, to report our entry into the Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release (described in greater detail above).

-42-

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	TEXHOMA ENERGY, INC.

	/s/ Daniel Vesco
	Daniel Vesco
	Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)
	Date: February 15, 2008

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SIGNATURE	TITLE	DATE


/s/ Daniel Vesco
Daniel Vesco	Chief Executive Officer	February 15, 2008
	Chief Financial Officer,
	(Principal Financial Officer) and
	Director

-43-

Texhoma Energy (CE) (USOTC:TXHE)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Jun 2024 bis Jul 2024

Click Here for more Texhoma Energy (CE) Charts.

Texhoma Energy (CE) (USOTC:TXHE)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Jul 2023 bis Jul 2024

Marktdaten

News

Werkzeuge

Märkte

Entdecken

Hot Features

Follow Feed

Optionen-Flow

Watchlist

TXHE Texhoma Energy Inc (CE)

News Texhoma Energy Inc

Kürzlich von Ihnen besucht

Unternehmen

Geschäft

Popular

App herunterladen

Trends

Toplisten

Marktdaten

News

Werkzeuge

Märkte

Entdecken

Hot Features

Follow Feed

Optionen-Flow

Watchlist

TXHE Texhoma Energy Inc (CE)

News Texhoma Energy Inc

Kürzlich von Ihnen besucht

Unternehmen

Geschäft

Popular

App herunterladen