NOTES
TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
April
30, 2017
NOTE
1 – ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
We
were organized under the laws of the State of Nevada on May 7, 2008 under the name “Claridge Ventures, Inc.” with an initial
focus on the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties in the State of Nevada. On August 6, 2013, we affected a 1 for 4 reverse
split of its common stock and changed our name to “Indo Global Exchange(s) PTE. Ltd”. We have two wholly-owned subsidiaries:
International Global Exchange (Aust) Pty Ltd and PT GriyaMatahari Bali. International Global Exchange (Aust) Pty Ltd is based in Australia
and was set up for the purpose of entering into the introducing broker agreement with Halifax. PT GriyaMatahari Bali is based in Indonesia
and was set up to allow us to operate in Indonesia under Indonesia law.
On
September 23, 2013 (the “Closing Date”), Indo Global Exchange(s) Pte. Ltd., a Nevada corporation (formerly Claridge Ventures,
Inc.) (the “Registrant” or “Company”), closed an asset purchase transaction (the “Transaction”) with
Indo Global Exchange PTE LTD., a company organized under the laws of Singapore (“Indo Global”) and the shareholders of Indo
Global (“Selling Shareholders”) pursuant to an Amended and Restated Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of the Closing Date
(the “Purchase Agreement”) by and among the Company, Indo Global, and the Selling Shareholders.
In
accordance with the terms of the Purchase Agreement, on the Closing Date, the Company issued 43,496,250 shares of its common stock (the
“Shares”) directly to the Selling Shareholders in exchange for certain assets of Indo Global (the “Assets”) including,
rights to enter into certain agreements and certain intellectual property. The Company did not acquire any plant and equipment, and any
other business and operational assets of Indo Global as part of the Assets, and the Company did not hire any employees of Indo Global.
Indo Global will continue as an independent company, operating in Singapore after the Transaction.
On
May 29, 2014, Indo Global Exchange(s) Pte. Ltd. (the “Company”) entered in to an engagement agreement (the “Agreement”)
with International Global Exchange (AUST) (“IGE”), PT GriyaMatahari Bali, and Kina Securities Limited (“Kina”)
with an effective date of November 25, 2013. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, Kina appointed the Company, IGE and PT GriyaMatahari
Bali (collectively, “IGEX”) to provide certain services to Kina, including use of IGEX’s comprehensive online trading
platform for Kina referred clients, which platform includes access to 21 global equity exchanges, account statements in real time, live
streaming news and other features and capabilities. The term of the Agreement is ten (10) years and may be terminated for cause or without
cause upon120 days’ notice to the other party. Kina may terminate the Agreement for cause upon the occurrence of certain events,
including the following: IGEX (i) has a liquidator or receiver appointed, (ii) becomes an externally administered body, (iii) passes
a resolution for winding up, (iv) is guilty of any fraudulent act or willful misconduct which is related to the Agreement, or (v) breaches
the terms of the Agreement.
On
the 26 th November 2015, IGEX appointed Goldhurst and Schnider of Melbourne, Australia to formally notify Kina that they are in breach
of the contract. The breach was in relation to Kina making unfounded statements to the market about IGEX and not formally giving notice
as required by the agreement. IGEX is now seeking compensation from Kina for AUD$2,400,000.
The
Company generated revenue of $0 and $3,485 for the nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The revenue is a result of
service fee and commission. These revenues were derived from client trading accounts in the form of commissions and profit share, paid
by FxPro the execution and clearing business.
NOTE
2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis
of Presentation
The
unaudited condensed interim financial statements have been prepared by us pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The information furnished herein reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals and adjustments)
which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to fairly present the operating results for the respective periods. Certain information
and footnote disclosures normally present in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These financial statements should
be read in conjunction with the unaudited financial statements and notes for the year ended July 31, 2016 included in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K. The results of the six months periods ended April 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected
for the full year ending July 31, 2017.
Principles
of Consolidation
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements represent the consolidated financial position and results of operations of the Company
and include the accounts and results of operations of Indo Global Exchange(s) PTE. Ltd. and two wholly-owned subsidiaries, International
Global Exchange (Aust) Pty Ltd and PT GriyaMatahari Bali. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the
date of these financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Start-up
Expenses
The
Company expenses costs associated with start-up activities as incurred. Accordingly, start-up costs associated with the Company’s
formation have been included in the Company’s general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended April 30, 2017 and
2016.
Foreign
Currency Translation
The
Company’s functional and reporting currency is the US dollar as the company is listed in the USA. Operations for the company are
spread between USA, Indonesia and Australia.
Translation
adjustments for the April 30, 2017 and 2016 were $0 and $(519), respectively. The cumulative translation adjustment and effect of exchange
rate changes on cash as of April 30, 2017 and July 31, 2016 were $0 and $(773) respectively. Transaction gains and losses that arise
from exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency are included in the results
of operations as incurred. Specifically, translation of AUD to USD.
Assets
and liabilities that are denominated in a foreign currency are translated at the exchange rate in effect at the year end and capital
accounts are translated at historical rates. Income statement accounts are translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing during
the period. Translation adjustments from the use of different exchange rates from period to period are included in the Comprehensive
Income statement account in Stockholder’s Equity, if applicable.
Transactions
undertaken in currencies other than the functional currency of the entity are translated using the exchange rate in effect as of the
transaction date. If applicable, exchange gains and losses are included in other items on the Statement of Operations.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The
Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. As of April
30, 2017 and July 31, 2016, there are no cash or cash equivalents.
Basic
and Diluted Loss Per Share
The
Company computed basic and diluted loss per share amounts using generally accepted accounting principles. There are no potentially dilutive
shares outstanding and, accordingly, dilutive per share amounts have not been presented in the accompanying statements of operations.
Revenue
Recognition
We
recognize revenue from services rendered when the following four revenue recognition criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; the selling price is fixed or determinable; and collectability is reasonably
assured.
Currently,
we have limited revenues or customers. We plan to derive revenues from multiple sources. First, we charge a service fee as commission
income and the amount varies based on the size and volume of trade by the customers. Second, the Company will share 25% on all profits
generated by the customers at the end of each trading cycle.
The
Company generated revenue of $0 and $3,485 for the nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The revenue is a result of
service fee and commission. These revenues were derived from client trading accounts in the form of commissions and profit share, paid
by FxPro the execution and clearing business.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments - On July 1, 2008, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures (“Topic 820”). Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for
disclosures of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The three levels are defined as follows:
| |
● |
Level 1 inputs to the valuation
methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. |
| |
● |
Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include
quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either
directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. |
| |
● |
Level 3 inputs to valuation methodology are unobservable
and significant to the fair measurement. |
The
Company’s adoption of fair value measurements and disclosures did not have a material impact on the financial statements and financial
statement disclosures.
Income
Taxes
The
Company records income taxes in accordance with the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting
Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 740, “Income Taxes.” The standard requires, among other provisions, an asset
and liability approach to recognize deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences
between the financial statement carrying amounts and tax basis of assets and liabilities. Valuation allowances are provided if based
upon the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Basic
and Diluted Loss Per Share
Net
loss per share is calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, for the period presented. ASC 260 requires presentation
of basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share. Basic income (loss) per share (“Basic EPS”) is computed by dividing
net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings
per share (“Diluted EPS”) is similarly calculated. Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method. Under this
method, options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as
if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. For the nine months ended
April 30, 2017 and 2016, there were no potentially dilutive securities.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
Adopted
In
June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014 10, Development Stage Entities (Topic915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements.
ASU 201410 eliminates the distinction of a development stage entity and certain related disclosure requirements, including the elimination
of inception to-date information on the statements of operations, cash flows and stockholders’ equity. IGEX have decided to leave
additional inception to date information on the Shareholders Equity for historical purposes. The amendments in ASU2014-10 will be effective
prospectively for annual reporting periods beginning after December15, 2014, and interim periods within those annual periods, however
early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted ASU2014-10 since the quarter ended April 30, 2013, thereby no longer presenting or disclosing
any information required by Topic 915.
Not
Adopted
In
February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-04, Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements
for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date. The amendments in ASU 2013-04 provide guidance for the recognition,
measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the
obligation within the scope of this Update is fixed at the reporting date, except for obligations addressed within existing guidance
in U.S. GAAP. The guidance requires an entity to measure those obligations as the sum of the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay
on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors and any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its
co-obligors. The guidance in this Update also requires an entity to disclose the nature and amount of the obligation as well as other
information about those obligations. The amendment in this standard is effective retrospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods
within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-04 did not have a material impact on our financial
statements.
In
April 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-07, Presentation of Financial Statements (Top 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting. The objective
of ASU No. 2013-07 is to clarify when an entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting and to provide principles for the measurement
of assets and liabilities under the liquidation basis of accounting, as well as any required disclosures. The amendments in this standard
is effective prospectively for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December
15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-07 did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
In
August 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going
Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”).
In
connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, an entity’s management should evaluate
whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to
continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued ( or within one year after
the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Management’s evaluation should be based
on relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued (
or at the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Substantial doubt about an entity’s
ability to continue as a going concern exists when relevant conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it is probable
that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements
are issued (or available to be issued). The term probable is used consistently with its use in Topic 450, Contingencies.
When
management identifies conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern,
management should consider whether its plans that are intended to mitigate those relevant conditions or events will alleviate the substantial
doubt. The mitigating effect of management’s plans should be considered only to the extent that (1) it is probable that the plans
will be effectively implemented and, if so, (2) it is probable that the plans will mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial
doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
If
conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, but the substantial doubt
is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, the entity should disclose information that enables users of
the financial statements to understand all of the following (or refer to similar information disclosed elsewhere in the footnotes):
| |
a. |
Principal conditions
or events that raised substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern (before consideration of
management’s plans) |
| |
b. |
Management’s evaluation
of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations |
| |
c. |
Management’s
plans that alleviated substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
|
If
conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and substantial doubt is
not alleviated after consideration of management’s plans, an entity should include a statement in the footnotes indicating that
there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial
statements are issued (or available to be issued). Additionally, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial
statements to understand all of the following:
| |
a. |
Principal conditions
or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern |
| |
b. |
Management’s evaluation
of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations |
| |
c. |
Management’s
plans that are intended to mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue
as a going concern.
|
The
amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2017, and for annual periods and interim periods
thereafter. Early application is permitted.
Management
does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, when adopted, will have a material effect
on the accompanying financial statements.
NOTE
3 – GOING CONCERN
These
financial statements are presented on the basis that the Company is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and
satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business over a reasonable length of time. As of April 30, 2017 the Company had incurred
accumulated losses since inception of $7,591,643. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability
and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company
be unable to continue as a going concern. Its continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate sufficient cash
flow to meet its obligations on a timely basis, to obtain additional financing or refinancing as may be required, and ultimately to establish
profitable operations.
Management’s
plans for the continuation of the Company as a going concern include financing the Company’s operations through issuance of its
common stock. If the Company is unable to complete its financing requirements or achieve revenue as projected, it will then modify its
expenditures and plan of operations to coincide with the actual financing completed and actual operating revenues. There are no assurances,
however, with respect to the future success of these plans.
NOTE
4 –ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses amounted to $23,208 and $23,208 as of April 30, 2017 and July 31, 2016, respectively. Accounts payable and
accrued expenses represent primarily unpaid legal expenses, accounting expenses, and other professional expenses.
NOTE
5 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Due
to a related party amounted to $327,559 and $327,559 as of April 30, 2017 and July 31, 2016, respectively. Due to a related party represents
advances by John O’Shea, CEO of the Company, to pay company’s expenses.
Loan
to a related party amounted to $15,000 and $15,000 as of April 30, 2017 and July 31, 2016, respectively. Loan to a related party represents
loan to the Company by John O’Shea, CEO of the Company. The loan is interest free, without collateral, due on demand, and for company’s
operation purpose.
On
October 6, 2015, the Company issued 1,500,000,000 shares of common stock to employees for services. The company issued John O’Shea1,500,000,000
in lieu of salaries valued at $0.0014 per share, using the closing prices on the stock issuance date (future shares issued from this
pool). The Company booked stock compensation expenses of $2,100,000 based on the closing price of the stock issuance date.
On
October 8, 2015, the Company cancelled 100,000,000 shares of common stock issued as compensation to John O’Shea as stock compensation.
The canceled shares were cancelled to employees.
On
November 5, 2015, the Company cancelled 100,000,000 shares of common stock issued as compensation to John O’Shea as stock compensation.
The canceled shares were cancelled to employees.
On
December 18, 2015, the Company cancelled 820,000,000 shares of common stock issued as compensation to John O’Shea as stock compensation.
The canceled shares were cancelled to employees.
On
February 11, 2016, the Company cancelled 480,000,000
shares of common stock issued as compensation to John O’Shea as stock compensation. The canceled shares were cancelled to
employees.
NOTE
6 – LOANS PAYABLE TO UNRELATED PARTIES
Unrelated
party loans payable represent money received from investors to purchase shares. As of April 30, 2017 and July 31, 2016, the Company has
unrelated party loans payable totaling $120,748 and $120,748, respectively.
The
current balance, $120,748 is detailed below:
SCHEDULE
OF LOANS PAYABLE TO UNRELATED PARTIES
| Herawan Rusmanhadi | |
$ | 72,967 | |
| David White | |
$ | 9,775 | |
| Dermot Monaghan | |
$ | 38,006 | |
NOTE
7 – STOCK
Stock
issuance for debt settlement
On
January 28, 2015, the Company issued 91,600,000 shares of common stock at $0.001 using the closing prices on the stock issuance date
to shareholders for interest expense on notes previously issued that have not received principal or interest payments to settle interest
owed of $1,597,253 Compared with $0 issuance in the previous year. The par value of this issuance was $91,600 and the additional paid
up capital was $1,505,600.
On
January 28, 2015, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock at a fair value of $0.012 for $10,000 cash for service to an unrelated
party, using the closing prices on the stock issuance date.
On
January 28, 2015, the Company issued 75,000,000 shares of common stock to consultants for services. The fair value of the shares is $0.012
per share for a total of $900,000, using the closing prices on the stock issuance date. These shares were issued as stock based compensation
for consulting services. The following table shows all transactions related to the 75,000,000 stock based allocation.
SCHEDULE
OF TRANSACTIONS RELATED TO STOCK BASED ALLOCATION
| Date | |
Description | |
Change in Shares | | |
Stock Price on Issuance Date | | |
Consulting expense | |
| 28/01/2015 | |
Dora Sarros -Company set up Cost + Admin+ Con in lieu of salary or consulting fees | |
| 10,500,000 | | |
$ | 0.012 | | |
$ | 126,000 | |
| 28/01/2015 | |
Bill Leslie -Company set up Cost + Admin+ Con in lieu of salary or consulting fees | |
| 15,000,000 | | |
$ | 0.012 | | |
$ | 180,000 | |
| 28/01/2015 | |
Nigel O’Shea -Company set up Cost + Admin+ Con in lieu of salary or consulting fees | |
| 5,000,000 | | |
$ | 0.012 | | |
$ | 60,000 | |
| 28/01/2015 | |
James Eugene Manczak -Marketing and PR Admin+ Con | |
| 3,000,000 | | |
$ | 0.012 | | |
$ | 36,000 | |
| 28/01/2015 | |
Gosuinus Lens - （ January 1-July 1, 2015 ） Including 1000 G&A and 5000 prepaid | |
| 6,000,000 | | |
$ | 0.012 | | |
$ | 72,000 | |
| 28/01/2015 | |
Silas Curry - in lieu of salary or consulting fees | |
| 3,500,000 | | |
$ | 0.012 | | |
$ | 42,000 | |
| 29/01/2015 | |
StockVest - (January 28-April 28, 2015 ） ir, advertising, promotional and marketing services | |
| 2,000,000 | | |
$ | 0.012 | | |
$ | 24,000 | |
| 28/01/2015 | |
Square One consulting - in lieu of salary or consulting fees | |
| 5,000,000 | | |
$ | 0.012 | | |
$ | 60,000 | |
| 28/01/2015 | |
Stephen Fynmore -Company set up Cost + Admin+ Con in lieu of salary or consulting fees | |
| 20,000,000 | | |
$ | 0.012 | | |
$ | 240,000 | |
| 28/01/2015 | |
Richard Jackson - in lieu of salary or consulting fees | |
| 5,000,000 | | |
$ | 0.012 | | |
$ | 60,000 | |
| |
Total | |
| 75,000,000 | | |
| | | |
$ | 900,000 | |
On
January 29, 2015, the Company issued 60,000,000 shares of common stock. The issuance is related to debt settlement of $6,000 with two
unrelated parties. The fair value of the shares issued was $720,000 valued at $0.012 per share, using the closing price on the stock
issuance date. The Company booked $714,000 as a loss on debt extinguishment.
On
March 20, 2015, the Company issued 19,000,000 shares of common stock. The issuance is related to debt settlement of $10,000 of loans
payable with an unrelated party debt holder. The fair value of the shares issued was $68,400 valued at $0.0036 per share, using the closing
prices on the stock issuance date. The Company booked $58,400 as a loss on debt extinguishment.
On
April 9, 2015, the Company issued 80,000,000 shares of common stock. The issuance is related to debt settlement of $800 of loans payable
with two unrelated party debt holders. The fair value of the shares issued was $232,000 valued at $0.0029 per share, using the closing
prices on the stock issuance date. The Company booked $231,200 as a loss on debt extinguishment.
On
May 8, 2015, the Company issued 90,000,000 shares of common stock. The issuance is related to debt settlement of $900 of loans payable
with two unrelated party debt holders. The fair value of the shares issued was $90,000 valued at $0.001per share, using the closing prices
on the stock issuance date. The Company booked $89100 as a loss on debt extinguishment.
On
June 16, 2015, the Company issued 140,000,000 shares of common stock. The issuance is related to debt settlement of $900 of loans payable
with two unrelated party debt holders. The fair value of the shares issued was $140,000 valued at $0.001per share, using the closing
prices on the stock issuance date. The Company booked $139,100 as a loss on debt extinguishment.
On
July 22, 2015, the Company issued 20,000,000 shares of common stock. The issuance is related to debt settlement of $4,000 of loans payable
with an unrelated party debt holder. The fair value of the shares issued was $18,000 valued at $0.0009 per share, using the closing prices
on the effective date of the agreement. The Company booked $14,000 as a loss on debt extinguishment.
On
July 22, 2015, the Company issued 180,000,000 shares of common stock. The issuance is related to debt settlement of $9,000 of loans payable
with two unrelated party debt holders. The fair value of the shares issued was $162,000 valued at $0.0009 per share, using the closing
prices on the effective date of the agreement. The Company booked $153,000 as a loss on debt extinguishment.
On
August 7, 2015, the Company cancelled 50,000,000 shares of common stock. The canceled shares were returned to treasury.
On
August 7, 2015, the Company issued 47,151,000 shares of common stock in exchange for the cancellation of $5,847 loan payable. The fair
value of the shares issued was $117,878 valued at $0.0025 per share, using the closing prices on the stock issuance date. The Company
booked $112,031 as a loss on debt extinguishment.
On
September 30, 2015, the Company cancelled 35,158,108(in two lots $20,158,108 and 15,000,000 respectively) shares of common stock. The
canceled shares were returned to treasury.
On
September 30, 2015, the Company issued 49,300,000 shares of common stock in exchange for the cancellation of $9,950 loan payable. The
fair value of the shares issued was $118,320 valued at $0.0024 per share, using the closing prices on the stock issuance date. The Company
booked $108,370 as a loss on debt extinguishment.
On
October 6, 2015, the Company issued 1,500,000,000 shares of common stock to employees for services. The company issued John O’Shea1,500,000,000
in lieu of salaries valued at $0.0014 per share, using the closing prices on the stock issuance date.(future shares issued from this
pool). The Company booked stock compensation expenses of $2,100,000 based on the closing price of the stock issuance date.
On
October 6, 2015, the Company issued 25,000,000 shares of common stock in exchange for the cancellation of $10,000 loan payable. The fair
value of the shares issued was $34,000 valued at $0.00136 per share, using the closing prices on the stock issuance date. The Company
booked $24,000 as a loss on debt extinguishment.
On
October 7, 2015, the Company issued 15,700,000 shares of common stock in exchange for the cancellation of $7,065 loan payable. The fair
value of the shares issued was $18,840 valued at $0.0012 per share, using the closing prices on the stock issuance date. The Company
booked $11,775 as a loss on debt extinguishment.
On
October 8, 2015, the Company cancelled 100,000,000 shares of common stock issued as compensation to John O’Shea as stock compensation.
The canceled shares were cancelled to employees.
On
October 19, 2015, the Company issued 18,411,111 shares of common stock in exchange for the cancellation of $8,285 loan payable. The fair
value of the shares issued was $31,299 valued at $0.0017per share, using the closing prices on the stock issuance date. The Company booked
$23,014 as a loss on debt extinguishment.
On
November 5, 2015, the Company issued 90,000,000 shares of common stock in exchange for the cancellation of $9,000 loan payable. The fair
value of the shares issued was $36,000 valued at $0.0004 per share, using the closing prices on the stock issuance date. The Company
booked $27,000 as a loss on debt extinguishment.
Stock
Issuance for compensation
On
October 6, 2015, the Company issued 1,500,000,000 shares of common stock to employees for services. The company issued John O’Shea1,500,000,000
in lieu of salaries valued at $0.0014 per share, using the closing prices on the stock issuance date.(future shares issued from this
pool). The Company booked stock compensation expenses of $2,100,000 based on the closing price of the stock issuance date.
On
February 11, 2016, the Company cancelled 480,000,000
shares of common stock issued as compensation to John O’Shea as stock compensation. The canceled shares were cancelled to
employees.
Stock
Cancellation
On
August 7, 2015, the Company cancelled 50,000,000 shares of common stock issued as compensation to John O’Shea. The Company booked
the cancelation by decreasing common stock and increasing additional paid in capital.
On
September 30, 2015, the Company cancelled 20,158,108 shares of common stock issued to an unrelated party. The Company booked the cancelation
by decreasing common stock and increasing additional paid in capital.
On
September 30, 2015, the Company cancelled 15,000,000 shares of common stock issued to an unrelated party. The Company booked the cancelation
by decreasing common stock and increasing additional paid in capital.
On
October 8, 2015, the Company cancelled 100,000,000 shares of common stock issued as compensation to John O’Shea as stock compensation.
The canceled shares were cancelled to employees.
On
November 5, 2015, the Company cancelled 100,000,000 shares of common stock issued as compensation to John O’Shea as stock compensation.
The canceled shares were cancelled to employees.
On
December 18, 2015, the Company cancelled 820,000,000 shares of common stock issued as compensation to John O’Shea as stock compensation.
The canceled shares were cancelled to employees.
NOTE
8– GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
For
the nine months ended April 30, 2017 and 2016, General and administrative expenses include the following:
SCHEDULE OF GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
| | |
|
April 30, 2017 | | |
|
April 30, 2016 | |
| Consulting fee | |
| 0 | | |
| 1,522 | |
| G&A-Accounting | |
| 0 | | |
| 5,000 | |
| Legal fee | |
| 0 | | |
| - | |
| Salary | |
| 0 | | |
| 30,637 | |
| Stock compensation | |
| 0 | | |
| 2,100,000 | |
| Other expenses | |
| 0 | | |
| 16,831 | |
| Total | |
| 0 | | |
| 2,153,990 | |
NOTE
9 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
No
material subsequent events occurred.