Note 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION,
ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
OncoVista Innovative Therapies, Inc. (“OVIT”) is
a biopharmaceutical company developing targeted anticancer therapies by utilizing tumor-associated biomarkers. OVIT’s
product pipeline is comprised of advanced (Phase II) and early (Phase I) clinical-stage compounds, late preclinical drug candidates
and early preclinical leads. OVIT is not committed to any single treatment modality or class of compound, but believes that successful
treatment of cancer requires a tailored approach based upon individual patient disease characteristics.
Through its former subsidiary, AdnaGen AG (“AdnaGen”),
OVIT previously developed diagnostic kits for several cancer indications, and marketed diagnostic kits in Europe for the detection
of circulating tumor cells (“CTCs”) in patients with cancer.
On October 28, 2010, OVIT entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement
with Alere Holdings Bermuda Limited Canon's Court (“Alere Holdings”), whereby OVIT sold all of its shares, representing
approximately 78% of the total issued and outstanding shares of AdnaGen to Alere Holdings. Under the terms of the agreement,
OVIT and the other AdnaGen shareholders agreed to sell their respective shares of AdnaGen, and all AdnaGen related business assets,
to Alere Holdings for: (i) a $10 million up-front payment; (ii) $10 million in potential milestone payments contingent upon the
achievement of various balance sheet objectives within 24 months; and (iii) up to $63 million in potential milestone payments
contingent upon the achievement of various clinical, regulatory and sales objectives within the next 36 months. OVIT
is entitled to receive its pro rata portion of the up-front and potential milestone payments. In November 2010, OVIT
received $6.0 million, net of expenses and certain fees, as its share of the $10 million up-front payment. For the six month periods
ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, no milestone payments were received.
OVIT is using the proceeds from the sale of its shares in AdnaGen
to fund on-going development activities for its drug candidate portfolio. Additionally, OVIT is evaluating several
opportunities to license or acquire other compounds or diagnostic technologies that it believes will provide for treatments that
are highly targeted with low or no toxicity.
At June 30, 2014, OVIT had two full time employees. OncoVista,
Inc. (“OncoVista”), OVIT’s operating subsidiary, had no full-time employees.
Note 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”)
and the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) for interim
financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes necessary for a comprehensive presentation
of financial position, results of operations, and changes in deficit or cash flows. It is management's opinion, however, that
all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been made which are necessary for a fair financial
statement presentation. The interim results for the period ended June 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of results for the
full fiscal year.
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should
be read in conjunction with the required financial information included as part of OVIT’s Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2013.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts
of OVIT and OncoVista (collectively, the “Company”). All intercompany balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Significant estimates include the valuation of warrants and
stock options granted for services or compensation, estimates of the probability and potential magnitude of contingent liabilities,
estimates relating to the fair value of derivative liabilities and the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets.
Net Loss per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing net
income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing
net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding including the effect of share equivalents. Common stock
equivalents consist of shares issuable upon the exercise of certain common stock purchase warrants and stock options.
As the Company had losses from operations for the three and
six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, all unvested restricted stock, stock options and warrants are considered
to be anti-dilutive. At June 30, 2014 and 2013, the following shares have been excluded since their inclusion in the computation
of diluted EPS would be anti-dilutive:
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Stock options outstanding under various stock option plans
|
|
|
1,381,500
|
|
|
|
1,381,500
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
1,625,000
|
|
|
|
1,625,000
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,006,500
|
|
|
|
3,006,500
|
|
Share-Based Compensation
All share-based payments to employees are recorded and expensed
in the statements of operations under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 718
“Compensation –
Stock Compensation.”
ASC 718 requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment
awards made to employees and directors, including grants of employee stock options, based on estimated fair values. The Company
has used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate grant date fair value for all option grants.
Share-based compensation expense is based on the value of the
portion of share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest during the year, less expected forfeitures. ASC 718
requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures
differ from those estimates.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The Company has evaluated all recently issued accounting pronouncements
and believes such pronouncements do not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.
Note 3. GOING CONCERN AND
MANAGEMENT’S PLANS
As reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements,
the Company reported a net loss of approximately $1,200,000, and net cash used in operations of approximately $89,000 for the
six months ended June 30, 2014, an accumulated deficit of approximately $24.6 million and a total deficit of approximately $4.3
million at June 30, 2014. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
The Company believes it has sufficient capital to meet its anticipated operating cash requirements for the next two to three months.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal
course of business. These financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recovery of the recorded
assets or the classification of the liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. The
ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on management’s ability to further implement its strategic
plan, obtain additional capital, principally by obtaining additional debt and/or equity financing, and generate revenues from
collaborative agreements or sale of pharmaceutical products. There can be no assurance that these plans will be sufficient or
that additional financing will be available in amounts or terms acceptable to the Company, if at all.
Note 4. EQUIPMENT
Equipment balances at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are
summarized below:
|
|
2014(Unaudited)
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
30,132
|
|
|
$
|
30,132
|
|
Computer and office equipment
|
|
|
9,326
|
|
|
|
9,326
|
|
|
|
|
39,458
|
|
|
|
39,458
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(39,458
|
)
|
|
|
(38,981
|
)
|
Equipment, net
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
477
|
|
Note 5. ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accrued expenses at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are
summarized below:
|
|
2014(Unaudited)
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Legal and professional
|
|
$
|
28,088
|
|
|
$
|
28,008
|
|
Clinical and other studies
|
|
|
138,427
|
|
|
|
138,427
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
1,103,352
|
|
|
|
840,820
|
|
Minimum royalty
|
|
|
935,000
|
|
|
|
860,000
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6,704
|
|
|
|
6,704
|
|
Total accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
2,211,571
|
|
|
$
|
1,873,959
|
|
Note 6. DEBT
In April 2014, the Company borrowed $100,000 in exchange
for unsecured notes of totaling $100,000. Accrued interest at June 30, 2014 is approximately $1,700. The notes have an
interest rate of 8%, and are due on April 15, 2015. The debt holders may convert the principal and any interest into shares
of common stock at a price of $0.75 per share, or 80% of the amount of the Company’s next equity offering. The Company
has evaluated the conversion and contingent conversion features of the notes and determined that there is no beneficial
conversion feature as of June 30, 2014.
Note 7. DERIVATIVE LIABILITY
AND FAIR VALUE INFORMATION
The Company determined that warrants issued in connection with
the bridge round of debt financing entered into by the Company in January 2009 required liability classification due to certain
provisions that may result in an adjustment to the number shares issued upon settlement.
The estimated fair value of the derivative liability was $675,267
and $9,732 at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes pricing model to calculate
the fair value of its warrant liabilities. Key assumptions used to apply these models are as follows:
Expected term
|
|
0.5-1 years
|
Volatility
|
|
95.5-102.8%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
0.07-0.10%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
0%
|
Fair value measurements
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of June 30,
2014, are as follows:
|
|
Value at
June 30, 2014
|
|
|
Quoted prices
in active
markets
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant
other observable
inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liability
|
|
$
|
675,267
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
675,267
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
The fair value framework requires a categorization of assets
and liabilities into three levels based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to price the assets and liabilities. Level 1 provides
the most reliable measure of fair value, whereas Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. The three levels
are defined as follows:
Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets and liabilities.
Level 2: Observable inputs other than those included
in Level 1. For example, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets
or liabilities in inactive markets.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting management’s
own assumptions about the inputs used in pricing the asset or liability.
There were no financial assets or liabilities measured at fair
value, with the exception of cash and cash equivalents and the above mentioned derivative liability as of June 30, 2014 and December
31, 2013, respectively. The fair values of accounts payable/loan payable and stock grant liability approximate the carrying amounts
due to the short term nature of these instruments. The fair value of related party accounts payable and accrued expenses are not
practicable to estimate due to the related party nature of the underlying transactions.
Note 8. LEASES, COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
Lease Obligations
In January 2011, the Company entered a three-year lease with
an affiliate of the CEO for laboratory space which expired in December 2013. Beginning in January 2014, the Company is utilizing
the space, however, no terms have been negotiated and no payments have been made.
Legal Matters
On August 11, 2011, an action was filed against the Company
in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, entitled New Millennium PR Communications, Inc., against
OncoVista Innovative Therapies, Inc., seeking damages for the alleged breach of a public relations agreement. On January 31, 2013
a settlement was reached whereby the Company agreed to pay New Millennium $7,000, in two payments of $3,500 each, and issue 25,000
warrants at an exercise price of $0.25 per share.
On August 26, 2011, an action was filed in the Supreme Court
of the State of New York, New York County, by CAMOFI Master LDC and CAMHZN LDC (“Plaintiffs”) against OncoVista Innovative
Therapies, Inc. and OncoVista, Inc. (“Defendants”). Plaintiffs brought six claims against the Defendants: three for
breach of contract; one for declaratory relief; one for specific performance; and one for attorneys’ fees. The entire action
arose from Plaintiffs seeking the issuance of: (i) 1,980,712,767 shares of the Company’s common stock, and (ii) warrants
to purchase 702,857,767 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.001. Plaintiffs alleged these securities
were due to them pursuant to a Subscription Agreement, a Warrant Agreement and an Anti-Dilution Agreement signed with the Company
for a transaction in August 2007. On June 29, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment on all of their causes of action.
On January 17, 2013, oral arguments were heard and the court granted the Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the
declaratory relief cause of action only. The court reserved judgment on the other five causes of action and the judge asked the
parties to attempt to reach a settlement. While the judge indicated that the Anti-Dilution Agreement was unambiguous and not mistaken,
she also indicated that it would not be equitable to either the Company or its public shareholders to issue hundreds of millions
of additional shares. The parties were unable to reach a settlement and the matter went back to the court for a decision. On March
25, 2014, the court granted Plaintiffs’ causes of action for breach of contract and attorneys fees, but denied the cause
of action for specific performance, ruling that monetary damages would be sufficient to compensate Plaintiffs without the Company
being forced to issue hundreds of millions of additional shares. A Special Referee will decide the amount of the monetary damages
and attorneys’ fees to be awarded to Plaintiffs. Defendants will have the opportunity to argue these amounts at a hearing
before the Special Referee before that decision. The date for this hearing has not yet been set. No amount has been recorded in
the accompanying financial statements as the amount is not estimatable as of the issuance of the financial statements.
On February 16, 2012, the Company filed
an action in the 225 Judicial District Court of the State of Texas, Bexar County, entitled OncoVista Innovative Therapies, Inc.
against J. Michael Edwards. The action seeks damages relating to the executive employment agreement of J. Michael Edwards, our
former Chief Financial Officer. Specifically, the Company is seeking to have the Stock Option Agreement granted to Mr. Edwards
on January 6, 2009 be declared
void ab initio
. The Company is also seeking damages and attorney fees. On March 30, 2012,
the Company received a copy of a counterclaim that may be filed in the same court and is seeking approximately $197,000, plus
certain health and life insurance benefits, in alleged compensation due. On December 12, 2012 Mr. Edwards filed a third party
petition in the court against third party defendant Alexander L. Weis, our Chairman, CEO & President. Depositions are ongoing
and the Company believes the counterclaimant’s allegations are without merit and intends to vigorously defend these claims.
Note 9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Alexander L. Weis, Ph.D., Chairman of the Company’s Board
of Directors and its Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, and a significant shareholder,
is a beneficial owner of Lipitek International, Inc. and Lipitek Research, LLC. The Company leases its laboratory space from Lipitek,
Inc. under a three-year lease agreement. Management believes that rent is based on reasonable and customary rates as if the space
were rented to a third party.
On November 17, 2005, the Company entered into a purchase agreement
with Lipitek and Dr. Weis, under which Lipitek granted the Company an option to purchase all membership interests in Lipitek Research,
LLC (Lipitek Research) for a purchase price of $5.0 million, which is payable quarterly based upon revenues of Lipitek Research
up to $50,000 per quarter. Through June 30, 2014, the Company had paid a total of $550,000 toward this agreement and has accrued
$950,000 and $850,000, which is included in accounts payable in the consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2014, and December
31, 2013, respectively. During the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company made no payments toward the agreement.
Prior to the full payment of the purchase price, the Company
has the option, upon 30 days written notice, to abandon the purchase of Lipitek Research and would forfeit the amounts already
paid. All intellectual property developments by Lipitek Research through the term of the agreement or 2012, whichever is later,
shall remain the Company’s property, irrespective of whether the option is exercised. In addition, the Company will receive
80% of the research and development revenue earned by Lipitek while the agreement is in place. In the six month periods ended
June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company did not recognize any revenue from its share of Lipitek revenues.
For the potential acquisition of Lipitek, the Company determined
that, under SEC Regulation S-X, Rule 11-01(d) (“
11-01
”), and ASC 805 Lipitek would be classified as a development
stage company and thus was not considered a business. As a result, purchase accounting rules did not apply. The Company
also cannot determine with any certainty at this time, if it will exercise the option to purchase Lipitek in the future.
In addition the Company has a license agreement with Lipitek
which requires the Company to pay minimum royalties. The Company has accrued $710,000 and $690,000, which is included in accrued
expenses in the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
Note 10. EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Common Stock
The Company is authorized to issue up to 147,397,390 shares
of common stock. At June 30, 2014, shares of common stock reserved for future issuance are as follows:
Stock options outstanding
|
|
|
1,381,500
|
|
Warrants outstanding
|
|
|
1,625,000
|
|
Stock options available for grant
|
|
|
2,159,250
|
|
|
|
|
5,165,750
|
|
Restricted Stock
On June 13, 2012, the Company entered into an agreement to
grant an aggregate of 300,000 shares of common stock to Landmark Financial Corporation which shares vest at the rate of 50,000
shares per month for six months, the term of the agreement. These shares will be granted for services to be provided by Landmark
Financial Corporation related to identifying and evaluating alternative strategies for expanding the Company’s business.
As of June 30, 2014 the shares have not been issued to Landmark Financial Corporation. The Company recorded $66,000 in consulting
expense for the restricted stock grant for the year ended December 31, 2012, all of which is in accrued expenses as the shares
were not issued as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
Stock Option Plans
All option grants are expensed in the appropriate period based
upon each award’s vesting terms, in each case with an offsetting credit to additional paid in capital. Under the authoritative
guidance for share based compensation, in the event of termination, the Company will cease to recognize compensation expense.
There is no deferred compensation recorded upon initial grant date, instead, the fair value of the share-based payment is recognized
ratably over the stated vesting period. No stock options were granted during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.
The stock-based compensation expense recorded by the Company
for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, with respect to awards under the Company’s stock plans are as follows:
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Research and development
|
|
$
|
995
|
|
|
$
|
3,927
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Total employee stock-based compensation
|
|
$
|
995
|
|
|
$
|
3,927
|
|
The following is a summary of the Company’s stock option
activity:
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2014
|
|
|
1,381,500
|
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2014
|
|
|
1,381,500
|
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
|
4.34 years
|
|
$
|
381,325
|
|
Options Exercisable at June 30, 2014
|
|
|
1,381,500
|
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
|
4.34 years
|
|
$
|
381,325
|
|
Warrants
The following is a summary of the Company’s warrant activity:
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2014
|
|
|
1,625,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2014
|
|
|
1,625,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
0.50 years
|
|
$
|
757,625
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2014
|
|
|
1,625,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
0.50 years
|
|
$
|
757,625
|
|