STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
October 31, 2013
Active Assets
Institutional Money Trust
Active Assets
Institutional
Government
Securities Trust
Fund
|
|
Ticker
Symbol
|
|
Active Assets
Institutional Money Trust
|
|
AVIXX
|
|
Active Assets Institutional
Government Securities Trust
|
|
AISXX
|
|
This
Statement of Additional Information ("SAI")
is not a prospectus. The
Prospectus
(dated October 31, 2013) for Active Assets Institutional Money Trust and Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust (each, a "Fund," and together, the "Funds") may be obtained without charge from the Funds at their address or telephone number listed below.
The Funds' audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, including notes thereto, and the reports of the Funds' independent registered public accounting firm, are herein incorporated by reference from the Funds'
Annual Reports to Shareholders
. Copies of the Funds'
Annual Reports to Shareholders
must accompany the delivery of this SAI.
Active Assets Institutional Money Trust
Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust
522 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10036
(800) 548-7786
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I.
|
|
History of the Funds
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
II.
|
|
Description of the Funds and Their Investments and Risks
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
A. Classification
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
B. Investment Strategies and Risks
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
C. Investment Objectives/Policies/Investment Restrictions
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
D. Disclosure of Portfolio Holdings
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
III.
|
|
Management of the Funds
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
A. Boards of Trustees
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
B. Management Information
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
C. Compensation
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
IV.
|
|
Control Persons and Principal Holders of Securities
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
V.
|
|
Investment Advisory and Other Services
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
A. Adviser and Administrator
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
B. Principal Underwriter
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
C. Services Provided by the Adviser and Administrator
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
D. Other Service Providers
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
E. Codes of Ethics
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
F. Proxy Voting Policy and Proxy Voting Record
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
G. Revenue Sharing
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
VI.
|
|
Brokerage Allocation and Other Practices
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
A. Brokerage Transactions
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
B. Commissions
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
C. Brokerage Selection
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
D. Regular Broker-Dealers
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
VII.
|
|
Capital Stock and Other Securities
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
VIII.
|
|
Purchase, Redemption and Pricing of Shares
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
A. Purchase/Redemption of Shares
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
B. Offering Price
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
IX.
|
|
Taxation of the Funds and Their Shareholders
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
X.
|
|
Underwriters
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
XI.
|
|
Performance Data
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
XII.
|
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
XIII.
|
|
Fund Counsel
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
Appendix A. Morgan Stanley Investment Management Proxy Voting Policy and Procedures
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
|
Appendix B. Description of Ratings
|
|
|
B-1
|
|
|
2
Glossary of Selected Defined Terms
The terms defined in this glossary are frequently used in this
SAI
(other terms used occasionally are defined in the text of the document).
"Administrator" or "Morgan Stanley Services"
Morgan Stanley Services Company Inc., a wholly-owned fund services subsidiary of the Adviser.
"Adviser"
Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc., a wholly-owned investment adviser subsidiary of Morgan Stanley.
"Custodian"
State Street Bank and Trust Company.
"Distributor"
Morgan Stanley Distribution, Inc., a wholly-owned broker-dealer subsidiary of Morgan Stanley.
"Financial Advisors"
Morgan Stanley authorized financial services representatives.
"Fund"
Either of Active Assets Institutional Money Trust or Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust, each a registered, no-load open-end investment company.
"Independent Trustees"
Trustees who are not "interested persons" (as defined by the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended ("Investment Company Act")) of the Funds.
"Morgan Stanley & Co."
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, a wholly-owned broker-dealer subsidiary of Morgan Stanley.
"Morgan Stanley Funds"
Registered investment companies for which the Adviser serves as the investment adviser and that hold themselves out to investors as related companies for investment and investor services.
"Transfer Agent"
Boston Financial Data Services, Inc.
"Trustees"
The Boards of Trustees of the Funds.
3
I. HISTORY OF THE FUNDS
Each Fund was organized as a Massachusetts business trust, under a separate Declaration of Trust. Active Assets Institutional Money Trust was organized on November 23, 1999. Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust was organized on January 18, 2002.
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE FUNDS AND THEIR INVESTMENTS AND RISKS
A. Classification
Each Fund is an open-end, diversified management investment company whose investment objectives are to provide high current income, preservation of capital and liquidity.
B. Investment Strategies and Risks
The following discussion of the Funds' investment strategies and risks should be read with the sections of the Funds'
Prospectus
titled "Principal Investment Strategies," "Principal Risks" and "Additional Information about the Funds' Investment Objectives, Strategies and Risks."
Repurchase Agreements.
The Funds may invest in repurchase agreements. These agreements typically involve the acquisition by the Funds of debt securities from a selling financial institution (such as a bank or broker-dealer), coupled with an agreement that the institution will repurchase the underlying security, at a specified price and at a fixed time in the future (or on demand) if applicable. The underlying securities, which serve as collateral for the agreement, will be marked-to-market daily to determine that the value of the collateral, as specified in the agreement, does not decrease below the purchase price plus accrued interest. If such decrease occurs, additional collateral will be requested and, when received, will be added to the account to maintain full collateralization. Each Fund will accrue interest from the institution until the time when the repurchase is to occur. Although this date is deemed by each Fund to be the maturity date of a repurchase agreement, the maturities of securities subject to repurchase agreements are not subject to any limits.
While repurchase agreements involve certain risks not associated with direct investments in debt securities, the Funds follow procedures approved by the Trustees that are designed to minimize such risks. These procedures include effecting repurchase transactions only with large, well-capitalized and well-established financial institutions whose financial condition will be continually monitored by the Adviser. In addition, as described above, the value of the collateral underlying the repurchase agreement will be at least equal to the repurchase price which consists of the acquisition price paid to the seller of the securities plus the accrued resale premium, which is defined as the amount specified in the repurchase agreement or the daily amortization of the difference between the acquisition price and the resale price specified in the repurchase agreement. In the event of a default or bankruptcy by a selling financial institution, the Funds will seek to liquidate such collateral. However, the exercising of a Fund's right to liquidate such collateral could involve certain costs or delays and, to the extent that proceeds from any sale upon a default of the obligation to repurchase are less than the repurchase price, the Fund could suffer a loss. With respect to Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust, such collateral will consist entirely of securities that are direct obligations of, or that are fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by, the United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof. Active Assets Institutional Money Trust may invest in repurchase agreements backed by municipal securities and non-governmental collateral such as corporate debt obligations, convertible securities and common and preferred stock. Certain of these securities may be rated below investment grade. A Fund will not invest in repurchase agreements that do not mature within seven days if any such investment, together with any other illiquid assets held by that Fund, amounts to more than 5% of its net assets. A Fund's investments in repurchase agreements may at times be substantial when, in the view of the Fund's Adviser, liquidity or other conditions warrant.
Reverse Repurchase Agreements.
Each Fund may also use reverse repurchase agreements as part of its investment strategy. Reverse repurchase agreements involve sales by a Fund of portfolio assets concurrently with an agreement by the Fund to repurchase the same assets at a later date at a fixed price. Generally, the effect of such a transaction is that the Fund can recover all or most of the cash invested in the portfolio securities involved during the term of the reverse repurchase agreement, while it will be able to keep the interest income associated with those portfolio securities. Such transactions are only advantageous if the interest cost to the Fund of the reverse repurchase transaction is less than the
4
cost of otherwise obtaining the cash. Opportunities to achieve this advantage may not always be available, and each Fund intends to use the reverse repurchase technique only when it will be to its advantage to do so. Each Fund will establish a segregated account with its custodian bank in which it will maintain cash, cash equivalents or other portfolio securities equal in value to its obligations in respect of reverse repurchase agreements. Reverse repurchase agreements are considered borrowings by the Funds and, for purposes other than meeting redemptions, may not exceed 5% of each Fund's total assets.
Floating and Variable Rate Obligations.
The Funds may purchase floating and variable rate obligations, including floating and variable rate municipal obligations and preferred shares of closed-end funds. The value of these obligations is generally more stable than that of a fixed rate obligation in response to changes in interest rate levels. Subject to the conditions for using amortized cost valuation under the Investment Company Act, the Funds may consider the maturity of a variable or floating rate obligation to be shorter than its ultimate stated maturity if the obligation is a U.S. Treasury obligation or U.S. government security, if the obligation has a remaining maturity of 397 calendar days or less, or if the obligation has a demand feature that permits the Funds to receive payment at any time or at specified intervals not exceeding 397 calendar days. The issuers or financial intermediaries providing demand features may support their ability to purchase the obligations by obtaining credit with liquidity supports. These may include lines of credit, which are conditional commitments to lend, and letters of credit, which will ordinarily be irrevocable, both of which may be issued by domestic banks or foreign banks which have a branch, agency or subsidiary in the United States. The Funds may purchase variable or floating rate obligations from the issuers or may purchase certificates of participation, a type of floating or variable rate obligation, which are interests in a pool of debt obligations held by a bank or other financial institution.
Private Placements and Restricted Securities.
A Fund may invest up to 5% of its net assets in securities which are subject to restrictions on resale because they have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), or which are otherwise not readily marketable. (Securities eligible for resale pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act, and determined to be liquid pursuant to the procedures discussed in the following paragraph, are not subject to the foregoing restriction.) These securities are generally referred to as private placements or restricted securities. Such securities may involve a higher degree of business and financial risk that can result in substantial losses. As a result of the absence of a public trading market for these securities, they may be less liquid than publicly traded securities. To the extent these securities may be resold in privately negotiated transactions, the prices realized from these sales could be less than those originally paid by a Fund or less than what may be considered the fair value of such securities. Furthermore, issuers whose securities are not publicly traded may not be subject to the disclosure and other investor protection requirements which might be applicable if their securities were publicly traded. The illiquidity of the market, as well as the lack of publicly available information regarding these securities, may also adversely affect the ability to arrive at a fair value for certain securities at certain times and could make it difficult for the Funds to sell certain securities. If such securities are required to be registered under the securities laws of one or more jurisdictions before being sold, the Funds may be required to bear the expenses of registration.
Rule 144A permits the Funds to sell restricted securities to qualified institutional buyers without limitation. The Adviser and/or Sub-Adviser, pursuant to procedures adopted by the Trustees, will make a determination as to the liquidity of each restricted security purchased by a Fund. If a restricted security is determined to be "liquid," the security will not be included within the category "illiquid securities," which may not exceed 5% of a Fund's net assets. However, investing in Rule 144A securities could have the effect of increasing the level of Fund illiquidity to the extent a Fund, at a particular point in time, may be unable to find qualified institutional buyers interested in purchasing such securities.
Investment Company Securities.
Investment company securities are securities of other open-end, closed-end and unregistered investment companies, including foreign investment companies, exchange-traded funds and preferred shares of closed-end funds. A Fund may invest in investment company securities as may be permitted by (i) the Investment Company Act; (ii) the rules and regulations promulgated by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") under the Investment Company Act, as amended from time to time; or (iii) an exemption or other relief applicable to a Fund from provisions of the Investment Company Act. The Investment Company Act generally prohibits an investment company from acquiring more than 3% of the outstanding voting shares of an investment company and limits such investments to no more than 5% of a portfolio's total assets in any one investment company, and no more than 10% in any combination of investment companies. A Fund may invest in investment company securities of investment companies
5
managed by the Adviser or its affiliates to the extent permitted under the Investment Company Act or as otherwise authorized by the SEC. To the extent a Fund invests a portion of its assets in investment company securities, those assets will be subject to the risks of the purchased investment company's portfolio securities, and a shareholder in a Fund will bear not only his proportionate share of the expenses of a Fund, but also, indirectly the expenses of the purchased investment company.
To the extent permitted by applicable law, a Fund may invest all or some of its short term cash investments in any money market fund advised or managed by the Adviser or its affiliates. In connection with any such investments, a Fund, to the extent permitted by the Investment Company Act, will pay its share of all expenses (other than advisory and administrative fees) of a money market fund in which it invests. This may result in a Fund bearing some additional expenses.
Borrowing.
Active Assets Institutional Money Trust has an operating policy, which may be changed by the Fund's Board of Trustees, not to borrow except from a bank for temporary or emergency purposes in amounts not exceeding 5% (taken at the lower of cost or current value) of its total assets (not including the amount borrowed). Should the Board of Trustees remove this operating policy, the Fund would be permitted to borrow money from banks in accordance with the Investment Company Act, or the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC thereunder. Currently, the Investment Company Act permits a fund to borrow money from banks in an amount up to 33
1
/
3
% of its total assets (including the amount borrowed) less its liabilities (not including any borrowings but including the fair market value at the time of computation of any other senior securities then outstanding). The Fund may also borrow an additional 5% of its total assets without regard to the foregoing limitation for temporary purposes such as clearance of portfolio transactions. The Fund will only borrow when the Adviser believes that such borrowings will benefit the Fund after taking into account considerations such as interest income and possible gains or losses upon liquidation. The Fund will maintain asset coverage in accordance with the Investment Company Act.
With regard to Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust, the Fund will not borrow money, except for temporary or emergency purposes or to meet redemption requests which might otherwise require the untimely disposition of securities, provided that (i) borrowing in the aggregate may not exceed 33
1
/
3
% of the value of the Fund's total assets (including the amount borrowed), or mortgage, pledge or hypothecate any assets except in connection with any such borrowing and in amounts not in excess of 33
1
/
3
% of the value of the Fund's total assets, and (ii) borrowing for purposes other than meeting redemption requests may not exceed 5% of the value of the Fund's total assets (including the amount borrowed).
Borrowing by the Funds creates an opportunity for increased net income but, at the same time, creates special risks. For example, leveraging may exaggerate changes in and increase the volatility of the net asset value of Fund shares. This is because leverage tends to exaggerate the effect of any increase or decrease in the value of the Funds' portfolio securities. The use of leverage also may cause the Funds to liquidate portfolio positions when it may not be advantageous to do so to satisfy its obligations or to maintain asset coverage.
In general, the Funds may not issue any class of senior security, except that the Funds may (i) borrow from banks, provided that immediately following any such borrowing there is an asset coverage of at least 300% for all Fund borrowings and in the event such asset coverage falls below 300% the Funds will within three days or such longer period as the SEC may prescribe by rules and regulations, reduce the amount of its borrowings to an extent that the asset coverage of such borrowings shall be at least 300%, and (ii) engage in trading practices which could be deemed to involve the issuance of a senior security, provided that the Funds earmark cash or segregate liquid assets in accordance with applicable SEC regulations and interpretations.
Loans of Portfolio Securities.
Each Fund may lend its portfolio securities to brokers, dealers, banks and other institutional investors. By lending its portfolio securities, each Fund attempts to increase its net investment income through the receipt of interest on the cash collateral with respect to the loan or fees received from the borrower in connection with the loan. Any gain or loss in the market price of the securities loaned that might occur during the term of the loan would be for the account of each respective Fund. Each Fund employs an agent to implement the securities lending program and the agent receives a fee from the Fund for its services. Active Assets Institutional Money Trust may lend its portfolio securities up to 33
1
/
3
% of the value of its total assets and Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust may lend its portfolio securities up to 10% of the value of its total assets.
Each Fund may lend its portfolio securities so long as the terms, structure and the aggregate amount of such loans are not inconsistent with the Investment Company Act or the rules and regulations or
6
interpretations of the SEC thereunder, which currently require that (i) the borrower pledge and maintain with the Fund collateral consisting of liquid, unencumbered assets having a value at all times not less than 100% of the value of the securities loaned; (ii) the borrower add to such collateral whenever the price of the securities loaned rises (i.e., the borrower "marks to market" on a daily basis); (iii) the loan be made subject to termination by the Fund at any time; and (iv) the Fund receives a reasonable return on the loan (which may include the Fund investing any cash collateral in interest bearing short-term investments), any distributions on the loaned securities and any increase in their market value. In addition, voting rights may pass with the loaned securities, but each Fund will retain the right to call any security in anticipation of a vote that the Adviser deems material to the security on loan.
There may be risks of delay and costs involved in recovery of securities or even loss of rights in the collateral should the borrower of the securities fail financially. These delays and costs could be greater for foreign securities. However, loans will be made only to borrowers deemed by the Adviser to be creditworthy and when, in the judgment of the Adviser, the income which can be earned from such securities loans justifies the attendant risk. All relevant facts and circumstances, including the creditworthiness of the broker, dealer, bank or institution, will be considered in making decisions with respect to the lending of securities, subject to review by each Fund's Board of Trustees. Each Fund also bears the risk that the reinvestment of collateral will result in a principal loss. Finally, there is the risk that the price of the securities will increase while they are on loan and the collateral will not be adequate to cover their value.
Regulatory Matters.
The Funds have filed notices of eligibility with the National Futures Association ("NFA") claiming an exclusion from the definition of the term "commodity pool operator" ("CPO") under the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended ("CEA"), and the rules of the CFTC promulgated thereunder. Therefore, neither the Funds nor the Adviser (with respect to the Funds) is subject to registration or regulation as a commodity pool or CPO under the CEA. If the Funds become subject to these requirements, as well as related NFA rules, the Funds may incur additional compliance and other expenses.
When-Issued Securities.
The Funds may invest in certain fixed income securities purchased on a "when-issued" basis. This means that the securities are purchased at a certain price, but may not be delivered until a later date (e.g., 90 days later). No payment or delivery is made until the Fund receives payment or delivery from the other party to the transaction. Although the Fund receives no income from the above described securities prior to delivery, the market value of such securities is still subject to change. As a consequence, it is possible that the market price of the securities at the time of delivery may be higher or lower than the purchase price. The Fund will also earmark cash or liquid securities or maintain with the custodian a segregated account consisting of cash or liquid securities in an amount at least equal to these commitments.
Investment Strategies and Risks Applicable to Active Assets Institutional Money Trust
Promissory Notes.
The Fund may invest in unsecured promissory notes. Promissory notes are generally debt obligations of the issuing entity and are subject to the risks of investing in corporate debt. The Fund may invest up to 5% in illiquid securities, including unsecured bank promissory notes.
Funding Agreements.
The Fund may invest in funding agreements. A funding agreement is a contract between an issuer and a purchaser that obligates the issuer to pay a guaranteed rate of interest on a principal sum deposited by the purchaser. Funding agreements will also guarantee the return of principal and may guarantee a stream of payments over time. A funding agreement has a fixed maturity and may have either a fixed, variable or floating interest rate that is based on an index and guaranteed for a fixed time period. The secondary market, if any, for these funding agreements is limited; thus, such investments purchased by the Fund may be treated as illiquid. The Fund may invest up to 5% in illiquid securities, including funding agreements.
Corporates.
Corporate bonds ("Corporates") are fixed income securities issued by private corporations. Bondholders, as creditors, have a prior legal claim over common and preferred stockholders of the corporation as to both income and assets for the principal and interest due to the bondholder. The Fund will buy Corporates subject to any quality constraints set forth under Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act.
Asset-Backed Securities.
The Fund may invest in asset-backed securities. Asset-backed securities are securities secured by non-mortgage assets such as company receivables, truck and auto loans, leases, home equity loans and credit card receivables. Such securities are generally issued as pass-through certificates, which represent undivided fractional ownership interests in the underlying pools of
7
assets. Such securities also may be debt instruments, which are also known as collateralized obligations and are generally issued as the debt of a special purpose entity, such as a trust, organized solely for the purpose of owning such assets and issuing such debt. Credit support for asset-backed securities may be based on the underlying assets and/or provided by a third-party through credit enhancements. Credit enhancement techniques include letters of credit, insurance bonds, limited guarantees (which are generally provided by the issuer), senior-subordinated structures and over-collateralization. New instruments and variations of asset-backed securities continue to be developed. The Fund may invest in any of these instruments or variations.
Asset-backed securities are not issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or its agencies of instrumentalities; however, the payment of principal and interest on such obligations may be guaranteed up to certain amounts for a certain period by a letter of credit issued by a financial institution (such as a bank or insurance company) unaffiliated with the issuers of such securities. The purchase of asset-backed securities raises risk considerations peculiar to the financing of the instruments underlying such securities. For example, there is a risk that another party could acquire an interest in the obligations superior to that of the holders of the asset-backed securities. There also is the possibility that recoveries or repossessed collateral may not, in some cases, be available to support payments on those securities. Some asset-backed securities entail prepayment risk, which may vary depending on the type of asset. Securities subject to prepayment risk generally offer less potential for gains when interest rates decline, and may offer a greater potential for loss when interest rates rise. In addition, rising interest rates may cause prepayments to occur at a slower than expected rate, thereby effectively lengthening the maturity of the security and making the security more sensitive to interest rate changes. Asset-backed securities also involve the risk that various federal and state consumer laws and other legal, regulatory and economic factors may result in the collateral backing the securities being insufficient to support payment on the securities.
Adjustable Rate Government Securities.
Adjustable rate government securities are variable rate securities where the variable rate of interest is readjusted no less frequently than every 397 days and deemed to have a maturity equal to the period remaining until the next readjustment of the interest rate.
Municipal Obligations.
Municipal obligations are securities issued by state and local governments and their agencies. These securities typically are "general obligation" or "revenue" bonds, notes or commercial paper, including participations in lease obligations and installment purchase contracts of municipalities. These obligations may have fixed, variable or floating rates. To the extent the Fund invests in municipal obligations issued by state and local governments and their agencies, the Fund may be susceptible to political, economic, regulatory or other factors affecting issuers of these municipal obligations.
C. Investment Objectives/Policies/Investment Restrictions
Each Fund's investment objectives, policies and restrictions listed below have been adopted by the Funds as fundamental policies. Under the Investment Company Act, a fundamental policy may not be changed without the vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the applicable Fund. The Investment Company Act defines a majority as the lesser of (a) 67% or more of the shares present at a meeting of shareholders, if the holders of 50% of the outstanding shares of the applicable Fund are present or represented by proxy; or (b) more than 50% of the outstanding shares of the applicable Fund. For purposes of the following restrictions: (i) all percentage limitations apply immediately after a purchase or initial investment, and (ii) any subsequent change in any applicable percentage resulting from market fluctuations or other changes in total or net assets does not require elimination of any security from the portfolio, except in the case of borrowing and investments in illiquid securities.
Each Fund will:
1. Seek high current income, preservation of capital and liquidity.
The
Active Assets Institutional Money Trust
will not:
1. Invest in a manner inconsistent with its classification as a "diversified company" as provided by (i) the Investment Company Act, as amended from time to time, (ii) the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC under the Investment Company Act, as amended from time to time, or (iii) an exemption or other relief applicable to the Fund from the provisions for the Investment Company Act, as amended from time to time.
8
2. Borrow money, except the Fund may borrow money to the extent permitted by (i) the Investment Company Act, as amended from time to time, (ii) the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC under the Investment Company Act, as amended from time to time, or (iii) an exemption or other relief applicable to the Fund from the provisions of the Investment Company Act, as amended from time to time.
3. Purchase any securities, other than obligations of banks or of the U.S. Government, or its agencies or instrumentalities, if, immediately after such purchase, 25% or more of the value of the Fund's total assets would be invested in the securities of issuers in the same industry; however, there is no limitation as to investments in bank obligations or in obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government, its agencies or instrumentalities.
4. Make loans of money or property to any person, except (a) to the extent that securities or interests in which the Fund may invest are considered to be loans, (b) through the loan of portfolio securities, (c) by engaging in repurchase agreements or (d) as may otherwise be permitted by (i) the Investment Company Act, as amended from time to time, (ii) the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC under the Investment Company Act, as amended from time to time, or (iii) an exemption or other relief applicable to the Fund from the provisions of the Investment Company Act, as amended from time to time.
5. Purchase or sell real estate; however, the Fund may purchase marketable securities issued by companies which invest in real estate or interests therein.
6. Purchase or sell physical commodities unless acquired as a result of ownership of securities or other instruments; provided that this restriction shall not prohibit the Fund from purchasing or selling options, futures contracts and related options thereon, forward contracts, swaps, caps, floors, collars and any other financial instruments or from investing in securities or other instruments backed by physical commodities or as otherwise permitted by (i) the Investment Company Act, as amended from time to time, (ii) the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC under the Investment Company Act, as amended from time to time, or (iii) an exemption or other relief applicable to the Fund from the provisions of the Investment Company Act, as amended from time to time.
7. Underwrite securities of other issuers.
8. Issue senior securities, except the Fund may issue senior securities to the extent permitted by (i) the Investment Company Act, as amended from time to time, (ii) the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC under the Investment Company Act, as amended from time to time, or (iii) an exemption or other relief applicable to the Fund from the provisions of the Investment Company Act, as amended from time to time.
In addition, as a non-fundamental policy, which can be changed with Board approval and without shareholder vote, Active Assets Institutional Money Trust will not invest in other investment companies in reliance on Section 12(d)(1)(F), 12(d)(1)(G) or 12(d)(1)(J) of the Investment Company Act.
Active Assets Institutional Money Trust has an operating policy, which may be changed by the Fund's Board of Trustees, not to borrow except from a bank for temporary or emergency purposes in amounts not exceeding 5% (taken at the lower of cost or current value) of its total assets (not including the amount borrowed).
Notwithstanding any other investment policy or restriction, the Fund may seek to achieve its investment objectives by investing all or substantially all of its assets in another investment company having substantially the same investment objectives and policies as the Fund.
The
Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust
will not:
1. Borrow money, except for temporary or emergency purposes or to meet redemption requests which might otherwise require the untimely disposition of securities, provided that (i) borrowing in the aggregate may not exceed 33
1
/
3
% of the value of the Fund's total assets (including the amount borrowed); or mortgage, pledge or hypothecate any assets except in connection with any such borrowing and in amounts not in excess of 33
1
/
3
% of the value of the Fund's total assets, and (ii) borrowing for purposes other than meeting redemption requests may not exceed 5% of the value of the Fund's total assets (including the amount borrowed).
2. With respect to 75% of its total assets, purchase any securities, other than obligations of the U.S. Government, or its agencies or instrumentalities, if, immediately after such purchase, more than 5% of the value of the Fund's total assets would be invested in securities of any one issuer.
9
3. With respect to 75% of its total assets, purchase any securities, other than obligations of the U.S. Government, or its agencies or instrumentalities, if, immediately after such purchase, more than 10% of the outstanding securities of one issuer would be owned by the Fund (for this purpose all indebtedness of an issuer shall be deemed a single class of security).
4. Purchase any securities, other than obligations of banks or of the U.S. Government, or its agencies or instrumentalities, if, immediately after such purchase, 25% or more of the value of the Fund's total assets would be invested in the securities of issuers in the same industry; however, there is no limitation as to investments in bank obligations or in obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government, its agencies or instrumentalities.
5. Purchase any common stocks or other equity securities.
6. Make loans to others, except through the purchase of the permitted debt obligations and repurchase agreements; and loans of portfolio securities in excess of 10% of the value of the Fund's total assets, made in accordance with guidelines established by the Fund's Board of Trustees, including maintaining collateral from the borrower equal at all times to the current market value of the securities loaned.
7. Purchase or sell real estate; however, the Fund may purchase marketable securities issued by companies which invest in real estate or interests therein.
8. Purchase or sell commodities or commodity futures contracts, or oil, gas or mineral exploration or development programs.
9. Underwrite securities of other issuers.
10. Issue senior securities as defined in the Investment Company Act except insofar as the Fund may be deemed to have issued a senior security by reason of: (a) entering into any repurchase agreement; (b) entering into any reverse repurchase agreement; (c) purchasing any securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis; or (d) borrowing money in accordance with restrictions described above.
In addition, as a non-fundamental policy, Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust will not invest in other investment companies in reliance on Section 12(d)(1)(F), 12(d)(1)(G) or 12(d)(1)(J) of the Investment Company Act.
Notwithstanding any other investment policy or restriction, the Fund may seek to achieve its investment objectives by investing all or substantially all of its assets in another investment company having substantially the same investment objectives and policies as the Fund.
With respect to the above restrictions, "investments in bank obligations" refer to obligations of U.S.-regulated banks (including domestic branches of foreign banks).
The investment policies, limitations or practices of the Funds may not apply during periods of unusual or adverse market, economic, political or other conditions. Such market, economic, political or other conditions may include periods of abnormal or heightened market volatility, strained credit and/or liquidity conditions or increased governmental intervention in the markets or industries. During such periods, the Funds may not invest according to their principal investment strategies or in the manner in which their name may suggest, and may be subject to different and/or heightened risks. It is possible that such unusual or adverse conditions may continue for extended periods of time.
D. Disclosure of Portfolio Holdings
The Funds' Board of Trustees and the Adviser have adopted policies and procedures regarding disclosure of portfolio holdings (the "Policy"). Pursuant to the Policy, the Adviser may disclose information concerning Fund portfolio holdings only if such disclosure is consistent with the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws and the Funds' and the Adviser's fiduciary duties to Fund shareholders. In no instance may the Adviser or the Funds receive compensation or any other consideration in connection with the disclosure of information about the portfolio securities of the Funds. Consideration includes any agreement to maintain assets in the Funds or in other investment companies or accounts managed by the Adviser or its affiliates. Non-public information concerning portfolio holdings may be divulged to third-parties only when the Funds have a legitimate business purpose for doing so and the recipients of the information are subject to a duty of confidentiality. Under no circumstances shall current or prospective Fund shareholders receive non-public portfolio holdings information, except as described below.
In order to comply with amendments to Rule 2a-7, information concerning each Fund's portfolio holdings, as well as its daily weighted average portfolio maturity and weighted average life, is posted on its
10
public website no less frequently than five business days after the end of each month. It is also the current policy of the Funds to post this information on their website on a weekly basis. Also, the Funds file more detailed portfolio holdings information with the SEC on Form N-MFP within five business days after the end of each month. The SEC makes Form N-MFP filings publicly available on its website two months after the filing and a link to the SEC filing is posted on the Funds' website.
The Funds provide a complete schedule of portfolio holdings for the second and fourth fiscal quarters in their semiannual and annual reports, and for the first and third fiscal quarters in their filings with the SEC on Form N-Q.
All other portfolio holdings information that has not been disseminated in a manner making it available to investors generally as described above is non-public information for purposes of the Policy.
The Funds may make selective disclosure of non-public portfolio holdings information pursuant to certain exemptions set forth in the Policy. Third-parties eligible for exemptions under the Policy and therefore eligible to receive such disclosures currently include fund rating agencies, information exchange subscribers, consultants and analysts, portfolio analytics providers and service providers, provided that the third-party expressly agrees to maintain the disclosed information in confidence and not to trade portfolio securities or related derivative securities based on the non-public information. Non-public portfolio holdings information may not be disclosed to a third-party pursuant to an exemption unless and until the third-party recipient has entered into a non-disclosure agreement with a Fund and the arrangement has been reviewed and approved, as set forth in the Policy and discussed below. In addition, persons who owe a duty of trust or confidence to a Fund or the Adviser may receive non-public portfolio holdings information without entering into a non-disclosure agreement. Currently, these persons include (i) a Fund's independent registered public accounting firm (as of a Fund's fiscal year-end and on an as-needed basis), (ii) counsel to a Fund (on an as-needed basis), (iii) counsel to the independent Trustees (on an as-needed basis) and (iv) members of the Board of Trustees (on an as-needed basis). Subject to the terms and conditions of any agreement between the Adviser or the Funds and the third-party recipient, if these conditions for disclosure are satisfied, there shall be no restriction on the frequency with which Fund non-public portfolio holdings information is released, and no lag period shall apply (unless otherwise indicated below).
The Adviser may provide interest lists to broker-dealers who execute securities transactions for the Funds without entering into a non-disclosure agreement with the broker-dealers, provided that the interest list satisfies all of the following criteria: (1) the interest list must contain only the CUSIP numbers and/or ticker symbols of securities held in all registered management investment companies advised by the Adviser or its affiliates (the "MSIM Funds") on an aggregate, rather than a fund-by-fund basis; (2) the interest list must not contain information about the number or value of shares owned by a specified MSIM Fund; (3) the interest list may identify the investment strategy, but not the particular MSIM Funds, to which the list relates; and (4) the interest list may not identify the portfolio manager or team members responsible for managing the MSIM Funds.
Fund shareholders may elect in some circumstances to redeem their shares of the Funds in exchange for their pro rata share of the securities held by that Fund. Under such circumstances, Fund shareholders may receive a complete listing of the holdings of the Fund up to seven calendar days prior to making the redemption request provided that they represent in writing that they agree not to disclose or trade on the basis of the portfolio holdings information.
The Funds may discuss or otherwise disclose performance attribution analyses (i.e., mention the effects of having a particular security in the portfolio(s)) where such discussion is not contemporaneously made public, provided that the particular holding has been disclosed publicly. Additionally, any discussion of the analyses may not be more current than the date the holding was disclosed publicly.
The Funds may disclose portfolio holdings to transition managers, provided that the Funds have entered into a non-disclosure or confidentiality agreement with the party requesting that the information be provided to the transition manager and the party to the non-disclosure agreement has, in turn, entered into a non-disclosure or confidentiality agreement with the transition manager.
11
The Adviser and/or each Fund currently have entered into ongoing arrangements with the following parties:
Name
|
|
Information Disclosed
|
|
Frequency
(1)
|
|
Lag Time
|
|
Service Providers
|
|
RiskMetrics Group
(proxy voting agent)
(*)
|
|
Complete portfolio holdings
|
|
Daily basis
|
|
(2)
|
|
State Street Bank and Trust Company
(*)
|
|
Complete portfolio holdings
|
|
As needed
|
|
(2)
|
|
BlackRock Financial Management Inc.
(*)
|
|
Complete portfolio holdings
|
|
Daily basis
|
|
(2)
|
|
Fund Rating Agencies
|
|
Lipper
(*)
|
|
Top ten and complete portfolio holdings
|
|
Monthly basis
|
|
Approximately six business days after month end
|
|
Consultants and Analysts
|
|
Citigroup
(*)
|
|
Complete portfolio holdings
|
|
Monthly and quarterly basis, respectively
(4)
|
|
At least one day after month/quarter end
|
|
Credit Suisse First Boston
(*)
|
|
Top ten and complete portfolio holdings
|
|
Monthly and quarterly basis, respectively
|
|
Approximately 10-12 days after month/quarter end
|
|
Evaluation Associates
(*)
|
|
Top ten and complete portfolio holdings
|
|
Monthly and quarterly basis, respectively
(3)
|
|
Approximately 10-12 days after month/quarter end
|
|
Merrill Lynch
(*)
|
|
Top ten and complete portfolio holdings
|
|
Monthly and quarterly basis, respectively
(4)
|
|
Approximately 10-12 days after month/quarter end
|
|
Portfolio Analytics Providers
|
|
FactSet Research Systems, Inc.
(*)
|
|
Complete portfolio holdings
|
|
Daily basis
|
|
One day
|
|
(*)
This entity has agreed to maintain Fund non-public portfolio holdings information in confidence and not to trade portfolio securities based on the non-public portfolio holdings information.
(1)
Dissemination of portfolio holdings information to entities listed above may occur less frequently than indicated (or not at all).
(2)
Information will typically be provided on a real time basis or as soon thereafter as possible.
(3)
Complete portfolio holdings will also be provided upon request from time to time on a quarterly basis, with at least a 30 day lag.
(4)
This information will also be provided upon request from time to time.
All disclosures of non-public portfolio holdings information made to third-parties pursuant to the exemptions set forth in the Policy must be reviewed by Morgan Stanley Investment Management's ("MSIM") Legal and Compliance Division and approved by the Head of the Liquidity Business of MSIM. Disclosures made to third-parties in connection with (i) broker-dealer interest lists; (ii) shareholder in-kind distributions; (iii) attribution analyses; or (iv) transition managers are pre-approved for purposes of the Policy. In addition, the following categories of third-parties that may receive non-public portfolio holdings information are also pre-approved provided that they enter into non-disclosure agreements (as discussed above) (i) fund rating agencies; (ii) information exchange subscribers; (iii) consultants and analysts (including defined benefit and defined contribution plan sponsors, and variable annuity providers); (iv) portfolio analytics providers; and (v) service providers. The Adviser shall report quarterly to the Board of Trustees (or a designated committee thereof) at the next regularly scheduled meeting (i) any material information concerning all parties receiving non-public portfolio holdings information pursuant to an exemption; and (ii) any new non-disclosure agreements entered into during the reporting period. Procedures to monitor the use of such non-public portfolio holdings information may include requiring annual certifications that the recipients have utilized such information only pursuant to the terms of the agreement between the recipient and the Adviser and, for those recipients receiving information electronically, acceptance of the information will constitute reaffirmation that the third-party expressly agrees to maintain the disclosed information in confidence and not to trade portfolio securities based on the non-public information.
III. MANAGEMENT OF THE FUNDS
A. Boards of Trustees
General.
The Boards of Trustees of each of the Funds (collectively, the "Board") oversees the management of each Fund, but does not itself manage each Fund. The Trustees review various services provided by or under the direction of the Adviser to ensure that the Funds' general investment policies
12
and programs are properly carried out. The Trustees also conduct their review to ensure that administrative services are provided to the Funds in a satisfactory manner.
Under state law, the duties of the Trustees are generally characterized as a duty of loyalty and a duty of care. The duty of loyalty requires a Trustee to exercise his or her powers in the interest of the Funds and not the Trustee's own interest or the interest of another person or organization. A Trustee satisfies his or her duty of care by acting in good faith with the care of an ordinarily prudent person and in a manner the Trustee reasonably believes to be in the best interest of each Fund and its shareholders.
Trustees and Officers.
The Board of Trustees of Active Assets Institutional Money Trust consists of 10 Trustees and the Board of Trustees of Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust consists of nine Trustees. These same individuals also serve as directors or trustees for certain of the funds advised by the Adviser and Morgan Stanley AIP GP LP. Nine Trustees in the case of Active Assets Institutional Money Trust and eight Trustees in the case of Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust have no affiliation or business connection with the Adviser or any of its affiliated persons and do not own any stock or other securities issued by the Adviser's parent company, Morgan Stanley. These are the "non-interested" or "Independent" Trustees. The other Trustee (the "Interested Trustee") is affiliated with the Adviser.
Board Structure and Oversight Function.
The Board's leadership structure features an Independent Trustee serving as Chairperson and the Board Committees described below. The Chairperson participates in the preparation of the agenda for meetings of the Board and the preparation of information to be presented to the Board with respect to matters to be acted upon by the Board. The Chairperson also presides at all meetings of the Board and is involved in discussions regarding matters pertaining to the oversight of the management of each Fund between meetings.
The Board of Trustees operates using a system of committees to facilitate the timely and efficient consideration of all matters of importance to the Trustees, each Fund and Fund shareholders, and to facilitate compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and oversight of each Fund's activities and associated risks. The Board of Trustees has established five standing committees: (1) Audit Committee, (2) Governance Committee, (3) Compliance and Insurance Committee, (4) Investment Committee and (5) Closed-End Fund Committee. The Audit Committee, the Governance Committee and the Closed-End Fund Committee are comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Each committee charter governs the scope of the committee's responsibilities with respect to the oversight of each Fund. The responsibilities of each committee, including their oversight responsibilities, are described further under the caption "Independent Trustees and the Committees."
Each Fund is subject to a number of risks, including investment, compliance, operational and valuation risk, among others. The Board of Trustees oversees these risks as part of its broader oversight of each Fund's affairs through various Board and committee activities. The Board has adopted, and periodically reviews, policies and procedures designed to address various risks to each Fund. In addition, appropriate personnel, including but not limited to each Fund's Chief Compliance Officer, members of each Fund's administration and accounting teams, representatives from each Fund's independent registered public accounting firm, each Fund's Treasurer, portfolio management personnel and independent valuation and brokerage valuation service providers, make regular reports regarding each Fund's activities and related risks to the Board of Trustees and the committees, as appropriate. These reports include, among others, quarterly performance reports, quarterly derivatives activity and risk reports and discussions with members of the risk teams relating to each asset class. The Board's committee structure allows separate committees to focus on different aspects of risk and the potential impact of these risks on some or all of the funds in the complex and then report back to the full Board. In between regular meetings, Fund officers also communicate with the Trustees regarding material exceptions and items relevant to the Board's risk oversight function. The Board recognizes that it is not possible to identify all of the risks that may affect each Fund, and that it is not possible to develop processes and controls to eliminate all of the risks that may affect each Fund. Moreover, the Board recognizes that it may be necessary for each Fund to bear certain risks (such as investment risks) to achieve its investment objective.
As needed between meetings of the Board, the Board or a specific committee receives and reviews reports relating to each Fund and engages in discussions with appropriate parties relating to each Fund's operations and related risks.
B. Management Information
Independent Trustees.
Each Fund seeks as Trustees individuals of distinction and experience in business and finance, government service or academia. In determining that a particular Trustee was and continues to be qualified to serve as Trustee, the Board has considered a variety of criteria, none of
13
which, in isolation, was controlling. Based on a review of the experience, qualifications, attributes or skills of each Trustee, including those enumerated in the table below, the Board has determined that each of the Trustees is qualified to serve as a Trustee of each Fund. In addition, the Board believes that, collectively, the Trustees have balanced and diverse experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that allow the Board to operate effectively in governing each Fund and protecting the interests of shareholders. Information about each Fund's Governance Committee and Board of Trustees nomination process is provided below under the caption "Independent Trustees and the Committees."
The Independent Trustees of each Fund, their ages, addresses, positions held, lengths of time served, their principal business occupations during the past five years, the number of portfolios in the Fund Complex (defined below) overseen by each Independent Trustee (as of December 31,
2012) and other directorships, if any, held by the Trustees, are shown below. The Fund Complex includes all open-end and closed-end funds (including all of their portfolios) advised by the Adviser and any registered funds that have an investment adviser that is an affiliate of the Adviser (including, but not limited to, Morgan Stanley AIP GP LP (the "Morgan Stanley AIP Funds")) (collectively, the "Morgan Stanley Funds").
Independent Trustees†:
Name, Age and Address of
Independent Trustee
|
|
Position(s)
Held with
Registrants†
|
|
Length of
Time
Served*
|
|
Principal Occupation(s) During
Past 5 Years
|
|
Number of
Portfolios
in Fund
Complex
Overseen by
Independent
Trustee
|
|
Other Directorships Held
by Independent Trustee**
|
|
Frank L. Bowman (68)†
c/o Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
Counsel to the
Independent Trustees
1177 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Since August 2006
|
|
President, Strategic Decisions, LLC (consulting) (since February 2009); Director or Trustee of various Morgan Stanley Funds (since August 2006); Chairperson of the Insurance Sub-Committee of the Compliance and Insurance Committee (since February 2007); served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Nuclear Energy Institute (policy organization) (February 2005-November 2008); retired as Admiral, U.S. Navy after serving over 38 years on active duty including 8 years as Director of the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program in the Department of the Navy and the U.S. Department of Energy (1996-2004); served as Chief of Naval Personnel (July 1994-September 1996) and on the Joint Staff as Director of Political Military Affairs (June 1992-July 1994); knighted as Honorary Knight Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire; awarded the Officier de l'Orde National du Mérite by the French Government; elected to the National Academy of Engineering (2009).
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
Director of BP p.l.c.; Director of Naval and Nuclear Technologies LLP; Director of the Armed Services YMCA of the USA and the U.S. Naval Submarine League; Director of the American Shipbuilding Suppliers Association; Member of the National Security Advisory Council of the Center for U.S. Global Engagement and a member of the CNA Military Advisory Board.
|
|
† Frank L. Bowman, Kathleen A. Dennis, Michael F. Klein and W. Allen Reed do not serve on the Board of Trustees of Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust.
* Each Trustee serves an indefinite term, until his or her successor is elected.
** This includes any directorships at public companies and registered investment companies held by the Trustee at any time during the past five years.
14
Name, Age and Address of
Independent Trustee
|
|
Position(s)
Held with
Registrants†
|
|
Length of
Time
Served*
|
|
Principal Occupation(s) During
Past 5 Years
|
|
Number of
Portfolios
in Fund
Complex
Overseen by
Independent
Trustee
|
|
Other Directorships Held
by Independent Trustee**
|
|
Michael Bozic (72)
c/o Kramer Levin
Naftalis & Frankel LLP
Counsel to the
Independent Trustees
1177 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Since April 1994
|
|
Private investor and a member of the advisory board of American Road Group LLC (retail) (since June 2000); Chairperson of the Compliance and Insurance Committee (since October 2006); Director or Trustee of various Morgan Stanley Funds (since April 1994); formerly, Chairperson of the Insurance Committee (July 2006-September 2006); Vice Chairman of Kmart Corporation (December 1998-October 2000), Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Levitz Furniture Corporation (November 1995-November 1998) and President and Chief Executive Officer of Hills Department Stores (May 1991-July 1995); variously Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer (1987-1991) of the Sears Merchandise Group of Sears, Roebuck & Co.
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
Trustee and member of the Hillside College Board of Trustees.
|
|
Kathleen A. Dennis (60)†
c/o Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
Counsel to the
Independent Trustees
1177 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Since August 2006
|
|
President, Cedarwood Associates (mutual fund and investment management consulting) (since July
2006); Chairperson of the Money Market and Alternatives Sub-Committee of the Investment Committee (since
October 2006) and Director or Trustee of various Morgan Stanley Funds (since August 2006); formerly, Senior Managing Director of Victory Capital Management (1993-2006).
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
Director of various non-profit organizations.
|
|
Dr. Manuel H. Johnson (64)
c/o Johnson Smick
Group, Inc.
888 16th Street, N.W.
Suite 740
Washington, D.C. 20006
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Since July 1991
|
|
Senior Partner, Johnson Smick International, Inc. (consulting firm); Chairperson of the Investment Committee (since October 2006) and Director or Trustee of various Morgan Stanley Funds (since July 1991); Co-Chairman and a founder of the Group of Seven Council (G7C) (international economic commission); formerly, Chairperson of the Audit Committee (July 1991-September 2006); Vice Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury.
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
Director of NVR, Inc. (home construction).
|
|
† Frank L. Bowman, Kathleen A. Dennis, Michael F. Klein and W. Allen Reed do not serve on the Board of Trustees of Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust.
* Each Trustee serves an indefinite term, until his or her successor is elected.
** This includes any directorships at public companies and registered investment companies held by the Trustee at any time during the past five years.
15
Name, Age and Address of
Independent Trustee
|
|
Position(s)
Held with
Registrants†
|
|
Length of
Time
Served*
|
|
Principal Occupation(s) During
Past 5 Years
|
|
Number of
Portfolios
in Fund
Complex
Overseen by
Independent
Trustee
|
|
Other Directorships Held
by Independent Trustee**
|
|
Joseph J. Kearns (71)
c/o Kearns &
Associates LLC
PMB754
22631 Pacific Coast Highway
Malibu, CA 90265
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Since
August 1994
|
|
President, Kearns & Associates LLC (investment consulting); Chairperson of the Audit Committee (since October 2006) and Director or Trustee of various Morgan Stanley Funds (since August 1994); formerly, Deputy Chairperson of the Audit Committee (July 2003-September 2006) and Chairperson of the Audit Committee of various Morgan Stanley Funds (since August 1994); CFO of the J. Paul Getty Trust.
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
Director of Electro Rent Corporation (equipment leasing) and The Ford Family Foundation.
|
|
Michael F. Klein (54)†
c/o Kramer Levin Naftalis &
Frankel LLP
Counsel to the
Independent Trustees
1177
Avenue of the
Americas
New York, NY 10036
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Since August 2006
|
|
Managing Director, Aetos Capital, LLC (since March 2000) and Co-President, Aetos Alternatives Management, LLC (since January 2004); Chairperson of the Fixed Income Sub-Committee of the Investment Committee (since October 2006) and Director or Trustee of various Morgan Stanley Funds (since August 2006); formerly, Managing Director, Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Investment Management, President, various Morgan Stanley Funds (June 1998-March
2000) and Principal, Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Investment Management (August 1997-December 1999).
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
Director of certain investment funds managed or sponsored by Aetos Capital, LLC. Director of Sanitized AG and Sanitized Marketing AG (specialty chemicals).
|
|
Michael E. Nugent (77)
522
Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10036
|
|
Chairperson of the Board and Trustee
|
|
Chairperson of the Boards since July 2006 and Trustee since July 1991
|
|
General Partner, Triumph Capital, L.P. (private investment partnership); Chairperson of the Boards of various Morgan Stanley Funds (since July 2006); Chairperson of the Closed-
End Fund Committee (since June 2012) and Director or Trustee of various Morgan Stanley Funds (since July 1991); formerly, Chairperson of the Insurance Committee (until July 2006).
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
None.
|
|
W. Allen Reed (66)
†
c/o Kramer Levin Naftalis &
Frankel LLP
Counsel to the
Independent Trustees
1177
Avenue of the
Americas
New York, NY 10036
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Since August 2006
|
|
Chairperson of the Equity Sub-Committee of the Investment Committee (since October 2006) and Director or Trustee of various Morgan Stanley Funds (since August 2006); formerly, President and CEO of General Motors Asset Management; Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the GM Trust Bank and Corporate Vice President of General Motors Corporation (August
1994-December 2005).
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
Director of Temple-Inland Industries (packaging and forest products), Director of Legg Mason, Inc. and Director of the Auburn University Foundation.
|
|
† Frank L. Bowman, Kathleen A. Dennis, Michael F. Klein and W. Allen Reed do not serve on the Board of Trustees of Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust.
* Each Trustee serves an indefinite term, until his or her successor is elected.
** This includes any directorships at public companies and registered investment companies held by the Trustee at any time during the past five years.
16
Name, Age and Address of
Independent Trustee
|
|
Position(s)
Held with
Registrants†
|
|
Length of
Time
Served*
|
|
Principal Occupation(s) During
Past 5 Years
|
|
Number of
Portfolios
in Fund
Complex
Overseen by
Independent
Trustee
|
|
Other Directorships Held
by Independent Trustee**
|
|
Fergus Reid (81)
c/o Joe Pietryka, Inc.
85 Charles Colman Blvd.
Pawling, NY 12564
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Since
June 1992
|
|
Chairman, Joe Pietryka, Inc.; Chairperson of the Governance Committee and Director or Trustee of various Morgan Stanley Funds (since June 1992).
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
Through December 31, 2012, Trustee and Director of certain investment companies in the JPMorgan Fund complex.
|
|
† Frank L. Bowman, Kathleen A. Dennis, Michael F. Klein and W. Allen Reed do not serve on the Board of Trustees of Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust.
* Each Trustee serves an indefinite term, until his or her successor is elected.
** This includes any directorships at public companies and registered investment companies held by the Trustee at any time during the past five years.
The Trustee who is affiliated with the Adviser or affiliates of the Adviser (as set forth below) and executive officers of the Funds, their age, address, term of office and length of time served, their principal business occupations during the past five years, the number of portfolios in the Fund Complex overseen by the Interested Trustee (as of December 31, 2012) and the other directorships, if any, held by the Interested Trustee, are shown below.
Interested Trustee:
Name, Age and Address of
Interested Trustee
|
|
Position(s)
Held with
Registrants
|
|
Length of
Time
Served*
|
|
Principal Occupation(s) During
Past 5 Years
|
|
Number of
Portfolios
in Fund
Complex
Overseen by
Interested
Trustee
|
|
Other Directorships Held
by Interested Trustee**
|
|
James F. Higgins (65)
One New York Plaza
New York, NY 10004
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Since June
2000
|
|
Director or Trustee of various Morgan Stanley Funds (since June 2000); Senior Advisor of Morgan Stanley (since August 2000).
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
Director of AXA Financial, Inc. and The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States (financial services).
|
|
* Each Trustee serves an indefinite term, until his or her successor is elected.
** This includes any directorships at public companies and registered investment companies held by the Trustee at any time during the past five years.
17
Executive Officers:
Name, Age and Address of
Executive Officer
|
|
Position(s)
Held with
Registrants
|
|
Length of
Time
Served*
|
|
Principal Occupation(s) During
Past 5 Years
|
|
Kevin Klingert (51)
522
Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10036
|
|
President and Principal Executive Officer
|
|
Since September 2010
|
|
President and Principal Executive Officer (since September 2010) of the Money Market and Liquidity Funds; Head of Morgan Stanley Investment Management Liquidity business (since July 2010); Chief Operating Officer of Morgan Stanley Investment Management's Traditional Asset Management business, including Long-Only, Alternative Investment Partners and Global Liquidity (since February 2013); Managing Director of the Adviser and various entities affiliated with the Adviser (since December 2007). Formerly, Global Head, Chief Operating Officer and Acting Chief Investment Officer of the Fixed Income Group of the Adviser (April 2008-July 2010); Head of Global Liquidity Portfolio Management and co-head of Liquidity Credit Research of Morgan Stanley Investment Management (December 2007-July 2010) and Vice President of the funds in the Fund Complex (June 2008-July 2010). Previously, Managing Director on the Management Committee and head of Municipal Portfolio Management and Liquidity at BlackRock (October 1991-January 2007).
|
|
Mary Ann Picciotto (40)
522
Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10036
|
|
Chief Compliance Officer
|
|
Since May 2010
|
|
Managing Director of the Adviser and various entities affiliated with the Adviser; Chief Compliance Officer of various Morgan Stanley Funds (since May 2010); Chief Compliance Officer of the Adviser (since April 2007).
|
|
Stefanie V. Chang Yu (46)
522
Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10036
|
|
Vice President
|
|
Since December 1997
|
|
Managing Director of the Adviser and various entities affiliated with the Adviser; Vice President of various Morgan Stanley Funds (since December 1997).
|
|
Francis J. Smith (48)
522
Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10036
|
|
Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer
|
|
Treasurer since July 2003 and Principal Financial Officer since September 2002
|
|
Executive Director of the Adviser and various entities affiliated with the Adviser; Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of various Morgan Stanley Funds (since July 2003).
|
|
Mary E. Mullin (46)
522
Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10036
|
|
Secretary
|
|
Since June 1999
|
|
Executive Director of the Adviser and various entities affiliated with the Adviser; Secretary of various Morgan Stanley Funds (since June 1999).
|
|
* Each officer serves an indefinite term, until his or her successor is elected.
In addition, the following individuals who are officers of the Adviser or its affiliates serve as assistant secretaries of each of the Funds: Joanne Antico, Joseph C. Benedetti, Daniel E. Burton and Edward J. Meehan.
18
For each Trustee, the dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned by the Trustee in each of the Funds and in the Family of Investment Companies (Family of Investment Companies includes all of the registered investment companies advised by the Adviser and Morgan Stanley AIP GP LP) for the calendar year ended December 31, 2012, is set forth in the table below.
Name of Trustee
|
|
Dollar Range of Equity Securities in the Funds
(As of December 31, 2012)
|
|
Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities in
All Registered Investment Companies Overseen
by Trustee in Family of Investment Companies
(As of December 31, 2012)
|
|
Independent
|
|
Frank L. Bowman
(1)
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
over $100,000
|
|
Michael Bozic
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
over $100,000
|
|
Kathleen A. Dennis
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
over $100,000
|
|
Manuel H. Johnson
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
over $100,000
|
|
Joseph J. Kearns
(1)
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
over $100,000
|
|
Michael F. Klein
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
over $100,000
|
|
Michael E. Nugent
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
over $100,000
|
|
W. Allen Reed
(1)
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
over $100,000
|
|
Fergus Reid
(1)
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
over $100,000
|
|
Interested
|
|
James F. Higgins
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
over $100,000
|
|
(1) Includes the total amount of compensation deferred by the Trustee at his election pursuant to a deferred compensation plan. Such deferred compensation is placed in a deferral account and deemed to be invested in one or more of the Morgan Stanley Funds (or portfolio thereof) that are offered as investment options under the plan.
As to each Independent Trustee and his or her immediate family members, no person owned beneficially or of record securities in an investment adviser or principal underwriter of each Fund, or a person (other than a registered investment company) directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by or under common control with an investment adviser or principal underwriter of each Fund.
Independent Trustees and the Committees.
Law and regulation establish both general guidelines and specific duties for the Independent Trustees. The Board has five committees: (1) Audit Committee, (2) Governance Committee, (3) Compliance and Insurance Committee, (4) Investment Committee and (5) Closed-End Fund Committee.
The Independent Trustees are charged with recommending to the full Board approval of management, advisory and administration contracts, Rule 12b-1 plans and distribution and underwriting agreements; continually reviewing fund performance; checking on the pricing of portfolio securities, brokerage commissions, transfer agent costs and performance and trading among funds in the same complex; and approving fidelity bond and related insurance coverage and allocations, as well as other matters that arise from time to time. The Independent Trustees are required to select and nominate individuals to fill any Independent Trustee vacancy on the board of any fund that has a Rule 12b-1 plan of distribution. Most of the retail Morgan Stanley Funds have a Rule 12b-1 plan.
The Board of Trustees has a separately-designated standing Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). The Audit Committee is charged with recommending to the full Board the engagement or discharge of the Funds' independent registered public accounting firm; directing investigations into matters within the scope of the independent registered public accounting firm's duties, including the power to retain outside specialists; reviewing with the independent registered public accounting firm the audit plan and results of the auditing engagement; approving professional services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm and other accounting firms prior to the performance of the services; reviewing the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm; considering the range of audit and non-audit fees; reviewing the adequacy of the Funds' system of internal controls; and reviewing the valuation process. Each Fund has adopted a formal, written Audit Committee Charter.
The members of the Audit Committee for Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust are Joseph J. Kearns and Michael E. Nugent. The members of the Audit Committee for Active Assets Institutional Money Trust are Joseph J. Kearns, Michael E. Nugent and W. Allen Reed. None of the members of the Funds' Audit Committee is an "interested person," as defined under the Investment Company Act, of each Fund (with such disinterested Trustees being "Independent Trustees" or individually, an "Independent Trustee"). Each Independent Trustee is also "independent" from the Funds under the
19
listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. ("NYSE"). The Chairperson of the Audit Committee of each Fund is Joseph J. Kearns.
The Board of Trustees of each Fund also has a Governance Committee. The Governance Committee identifies individuals qualified to serve as Independent Trustees on the Funds' Board and on committees of such Board and recommends such qualified individuals for nomination by the Funds' Independent Trustees as candidates for election as Independent Trustees, advises each Funds' Board with respect to Board composition, procedures and committees, develops and recommends to each Fund's Board a set of corporate governance principles applicable to the Funds, monitors and makes recommendations on corporate governance matters and policies and procedures of the Funds' Board of Trustees and any Board committees and oversees periodic evaluations of the Funds' Board and its committees. All members of the Governance Committee are Independent Trustees. Fergus Reid is a member of the Governance Committee for Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust. The members of the Governance Committee for Active Assets Institutional Money Trust are Kathleen A. Dennis, Michael F. Klein and Fergus Reid. The Chairperson of the Governance Committee is Fergus Reid.
The Funds do not have a separate nominating committee. While the Funds' Governance Committee recommends qualified candidates for nominations as Independent Trustees, the Boards of Trustees of the Funds believe that the task of nominating prospective Independent Trustees is important enough to require the participation of all current Independent Trustees, rather than a separate committee consisting of only certain Independent Trustees. Accordingly, the Independent Trustees for Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust (Michael Bozic, Manuel H. Johnson, Joseph J. Kearns, Michael E. Nugent and Fergus Reid) and the Independent Trustees for Active Assets Institutional Money Trust (Frank L. Bowman, Michael Bozic, Kathleen A. Dennis, Manuel H. Johnson, Joseph J. Kearns, Michael F. Klein, Michael E. Nugent, W. Allen Reed and Fergus Reid) participate in the election and nomination of candidates for election as Independent Trustees for the Funds. Persons recommended by the Funds' Governance Committee as candidates for nomination as Independent Trustees shall possess such experience, qualifications, attributes, skills and diversity so as to enhance each Board's ability to manage and direct the affairs and business of the Funds, including, when applicable, to enhance the ability of committees of each Board to fulfill their duties and/or to satisfy any independence requirements imposed by law, regulation or any listing requirements of the NYSE. While the Independent Trustees of each Fund expects to be able to continue to identify from their own resources an ample number of qualified candidates for the Funds' Board as they deem appropriate, they will consider nominations from shareholders to the Board. Nominations from shareholders should be in writing and sent to the Independent Trustees as described below under the caption "Shareholder Communications."
The Board formed the Compliance and Insurance Committee to address insurance coverage and oversee the compliance function for the Funds and the Boards. The Compliance and Insurance Committee of Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust consists of Michael Bozic, James F. Higgins and Manuel H. Johnson. With respect to Active Assets Institutional Money Trust, the Compliance and Insurance Committee consists of Frank L. Bowman, Michael Bozic, James F. Higgins and Manuel H. Johnson. Frank L. Bowman, Michael Bozic and Manuel H. Johnson are Independent Trustees. The Chairperson of the Compliance and Insurance Committee is Michael Bozic. With respect to Active Assets Institutional Money Trust, the Compliance and Insurance Committee has an Insurance Sub-Committee to review and monitor the insurance coverage maintained by the Fund. The Chairperson of the Insurance Sub-Committee is Frank L. Bowman.
The Investment Committee oversees the portfolio investment process for and reviews the performance of the Funds. The Investment Committee also recommends to the Boards to approve or renew each Fund's Investment Advisory and Administration Agreements. All members of each Fund's Board serve on the Investment Committee. The Chairperson of the Investment Committee is Manuel H. Johnson.
With respect to Active Assets Institutional Money Trust, the Investment Committee has three Sub-Committees, each with its own Chairperson. Each Sub-Committee focuses on the Funds' primary areas of investment, namely equities, fixed income and alternatives. The Sub-Committees and their members are as follows:
(1) Equity W. Allen Reed (Chairperson), Frank L. Bowman and Michael E. Nugent.
(2) Fixed Income Michael F. Klein (Chairperson), Michael Bozic and Fergus Reid.
(3) Money Market and Alternatives Kathleen A. Dennis (Chairperson), James F. Higgins and Joseph J. Kearns.
20
The Boards formed the Closed-End Fund Committee to consider a range of issues unique to closed-end funds. The Closed-End Fund Committee consists of Michael E. Nugent, W. Allen Reed and Fergus Reid, each of whom is an Independent Trustee. The Chairperson of the Closed-End Fund Committee is Michael E. Nugent.
During the Funds' fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, the Board of Trustees held the following meetings:
Board of Trustees
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Committee/Sub-Committee:
|
|
Number of meetings:
|
|
Audit Committee
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Governance Committee
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Compliance and Insurance Committee
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Insurance Sub-Committee
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Investment Committee
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Equity Sub-Committee
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
Fixed Income Sub-Committee
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
Money Market and Alternatives Sub-Committee
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Closed-End Fund Committee
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Experience, Qualifications and Attributes.
The Board has concluded, based on each Trustee's experience, qualifications and attributes that each Board member should serve as a Trustee. Following is a brief summary of the information that led to and/or supports this conclusion.
Mr. Bowman has experience in a variety of business and financial matters through his prior service as a Director or Trustee for various other funds in the Fund Complex, where he serves as Chairperson of the Insurance Sub-Committee of the Compliance and Insurance Committee, and as a Director of BP p.l.c. and Naval and Nuclear Technologies LLC. Mr. Bowman also serves as a Director for the Armed Services YMCA of the USA, the U.S. Naval Submarine League and the American Shipbuilding Suppliers Association. Mr. Bowman is also a Member of the National Security Advisory Council of the Center for U.S. Global Engagement and a member of the CNA Military Advisory Board. Mr. Bowman retired as an Admiral in the U.S. Navy, after serving over 38 years on active duty including eight years as Director of the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program in the Department of the Navy and the U.S. Department of Energy(1996-2004). Additionally, Mr. Bowman served as the U.S. Navy's Chief of Naval Personnel (1994-1996), where he was responsible for the planning and programming of all manpower, personnel, training and education resources for the U.S. Navy, and on the Joint Staff as Director of Political Military Affairs (1992-1994). In addition, Mr. Bowman served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Nuclear Energy Institute. Mr. Bowman has received such distinctions as a knighthood as Honorary Knight Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire and the Officier de l'Orde National du Mérite from the French Government and was elected to the National Academy of Engineering (2009). He is President of the consulting firm Strategic Decisions, LLC.
With over 20 years of experience on the boards and in senior management of such companies as Kmart Corporation, Levitz Furniture Corporation, Hills Department Stores and Sears Merchandise Group of Sears, Roebuck & Co., where he also served as Chief Financial Officer of the Merchandise Group, and with nearly 20 years of experience as a Director or Trustee of certain other funds in the Fund Complex, Mr. Bozic has experience with a variety of financial, management, regulatory and operational issues as well as experience with marketing and distribution. Mr. Bozic has served as the Chairperson of the Compliance and Insurance Committee since 2006.
Ms. Dennis has over 25 years of business experience in the financial services industry and related fields including serving as a Director or Trustee of various other funds in the Fund Complex, where she serves as Chairperson of the Money Market and Alternatives Sub-Committee of the Investment Committee. Ms. Dennis possesses a strong understanding of the regulatory framework under which investment companies must operate based on her years of service to this Board and her position as Senior Managing Director of Victory Capital Management.
21
In addition to his tenure as a Director or Trustee of various other funds in the Fund Complex, where he formerly served as Chairperson of the Audit Committee, Dr. Johnson has also served as an officer or a board member of numerous companies for over 20 years. These positions included Co-Chairman and a founder of the Group of Seven Council, Director of NVR, Inc., Director of Evergreen Energy and Director of Greenwich Capital Holdings. He also has served as Vice Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury. In addition, Dr. Johnson also served as Chairman of the Financial Accounting Foundation, which oversees the Financial Accounting Standards Board, for seven years.
Mr. Kearns gained extensive experience regarding accounting through his experience on the Audit Committees of the boards of other funds in the Funds Complex, including serving as either Chairperson or Deputy Chairperson of the Audit Committee for nearly 20 years, and through his position as Chief Financial Officer of the J. Paul Getty Trust. He also has experience in financial, accounting, investment and regulatory matters through his position as President and founder of Kearns & Associates LLC, a financial consulting company. Mr. Kearns also serves as a Director of Electro Rent Corporation and The Ford Family Foundation. The Board has determined that Mr. Kearns is an "audit committee financial expert" as defined by the SEC.
Through his prior positions as Managing Director of Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Investment Management and as President of Morgan Stanley Institutional Funds, Mr. Klein has experience in the management and operation of registered investment companies, enabling him to provide management input and investment guidance to the Board. Mr. Klein also has extensive experience in the investment management industry based on his current positions as Managing Director of Aetos Capital, LLC and as Director of certain investment funds managed or sponsored by Aetos Capital, LLC. In addition, he also has experience as a member of the board of other funds in the Fund Complex.
Mr. Nugent has extensive experience with financial, accounting, investment and regulatory matters through his over 20 years of service on the boards of various funds in the Fund Complex, including time as the Chairperson of the Insurance Committee, Chairperson of the Closed-End Fund Committee and Chairperson of the Morgan Stanley Funds. Mr. Nugent also has experience as a General Partner in Triumph Capital, L.P.
Mr. Reed has experience on investment company boards and is experienced with financial, accounting, investment and regulatory matters through his prior service as a Director of iShares Inc. and his service as Trustee or Director of other funds in the Fund Complex. Mr. Reed also gained substantial experience in the financial services industry through his position as Director of Legg Mason, Inc. and prior position as President and CEO of General Motors Asset Management.
Mr. Reid has served on a number of mutual fund boards, including as a Trustee or Director of certain investment companies in the JP Morgan Funds complex and as a Trustee or Director of other funds in the Fund Complex. Therefore, Mr. Reid is experienced with financial, accounting, investment and regulatory matters, enabling him to provide management input and investment guidance to the Board.
Mr. Higgins has over 30 years of experience in the financial services industry. Mr. Higgins has substantial mutual fund experience and is experienced with financial, accounting, investment and regulatory matters due to his experience on the boards of other funds in the Fund Complex. Mr. Higgins also serves on the boards of other companies in the financial services industry, including AXA Financial, Inc. and The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States.
The Trustees' principal occupations during the past five years or more are shown in the above tables.
Advantages of Having the Same Individuals as Trustees for the Morgan Stanley Funds.
The Independent Trustees and each Fund's management believe that having the same Independent Trustees for each of the Morgan Stanley Funds avoids the duplication of effort that would arise from having different groups of individuals serving as Independent Trustees for each of the funds or even of sub-groups of funds. They believe that having the same individuals serve as Independent Trustees of all the Morgan Stanley Funds tends to increase their knowledge and expertise regarding matters which affect the Fund Complex generally and enhances their ability to negotiate on behalf of each fund with the fund's service providers. This arrangement also precludes the possibility of separate groups of Independent Trustees arriving at conflicting decisions regarding operations and management of the funds and avoids the cost and confusion
22
that would likely ensue. Finally, having the same Independent Trustees serve on all fund boards enhances the ability of each fund to obtain, at modest cost to each separate fund, the services of Independent Trustees of the caliber, experience and business acumen of the individuals who serve as Independent Trustees of the Morgan Stanley Funds.
Trustee and Officer Indemnification.
Each Fund's Declaration of Trust provides that no Trustee, Officer, employee or agent of the Fund is liable to the Fund or to a shareholder, nor is any Trustee, Officer, employee or agent liable to any third persons in connection with the affairs of the Fund, except as such liability may arise from his/her or its own bad faith, willful misfeasance, gross negligence or reckless disregard of his/her or its duties. It also provides that all third persons shall look solely to Fund property for satisfaction of claims arising in connection with the affairs of the Fund. With the exceptions stated, each Funds' Declaration of Trust provides that a Trustee, officer, employee or agent is entitled to be indemnified against all liability in connection with the affairs of each Fund.
Shareholder Communications.
Shareholders may send communications to the Funds' Board of Trustees. Shareholders should send communications intended for the Funds' Board by addressing the communications directly to the Board (or individual Board members) and/or otherwise clearly indicating in the salutation that the communication is for the Board (or individual Board members) and by sending the communication to either the Funds' office or directly to such Board member(s) at the address specified for each Trustee previously noted. Other shareholder communications received by the Funds not directly addressed and sent to the Board will be reviewed and generally responded to by management, and will be forwarded to the Board only at management's discretion based on the matters contained therein.
C. Compensation
Effective January 1, 2013, each Trustee (except for the Chairperson of the Boards) receives an annual retainer fee of $220,000 for serving as a Trustee of the Morgan Stanley Funds. Prior to January 1, 2013, each Trustee (except for the Chairman of the Boards) received an annual retainer fee of $210,000 for serving as a Trustee of the Morgan Stanley Funds.
The Chairperson of the Audit Committee receives an additional annual retainer fee of $78,750 and the Investment Committee Chairperson receives an additional annual retainer fee of $63,000. Other Committee and, effective January 1, 2012, Sub-Committee Chairpersons receive an additional annual retainer fee of $31,500. The aggregate compensation paid to each Trustee is paid by the Morgan Stanley Funds, and is allocated on a pro rata basis among each of the operational funds/portfolios of the Morgan Stanley Funds based on the relative net assets of each of the funds/portfolios. Michael E. Nugent receives a total annual retainer fee of $440,000 ($420,000 prior to January 1, 2013) for his services as Chairperson of the Boards of the Morgan Stanley Funds and for administrative services provided to each Board.
Each of the Funds also reimburse such Trustees for travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in connection with attending such meetings. Trustees of the Funds who are employed by the Adviser receive no compensation or expense reimbursement from the Funds for their services as Trustee.
Effective April 1, 2004, each of the Funds began a Deferred Compensation Plan (the "DC Plan"), which allows each Trustee to defer payment of all, or a portion, of the fees he or she receives for serving on the Board of Trustees throughout the year. Each eligible Trustee generally may elect to have the deferred amounts credited with a return equal to the total return on one or more of the Morgan Stanley Funds (or portfolios thereof) that are offered as investment options under the DC Plan. At the Trustee's election, distributions are either in one lump sum payment, or in the form of equal annual installments over a period of five years. The rights of an eligible Trustee and the beneficiaries to the amounts held under the DC Plan are unsecured and such amounts are subject to the claims of the creditors of each Fund.
Prior to April 1, 2004, certain Morgan Stanley Funds maintained a similar Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Prior DC Plan"), which also allowed each Independent Trustee to defer payment of all, or a portion, of the fees he or she received for serving on the Board of Trustees throughout the year. Generally, the DC Plan amends and supersedes the Prior DC Plan and all amounts payable under the Prior DC Plan are now subject to the terms of the DC Plan (except for amounts paid during the calendar year 2004, which remain subject to the terms of the Prior DC Plan).
The following table shows aggregate compensation payable to each of the Fund's Trustees from each of the Funds for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, and the aggregate compensation payable to
23
each of the Fund's Trustees by the Fund Complex (which includes all of the Morgan Stanley Funds) for the calendar year ended December 31, 2012.
Compensation
(1)
Name of Independent Trustee
|
|
Aggregate
compensation
from
Active Assets
Institutional
Money Trust
(2)
|
|
Aggregate
compensation
from
Active Assets
Institutional
Government
Securities Trust
†
|
|
Total compensation
from the Fund
Complex
(3)
|
|
Frank L. Bowman
†
|
|
$
|
2,387
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
241,500
|
|
|
Michael Bozic
|
|
|
2,347
|
|
|
$
|
3,485
|
|
|
|
241,500
|
|
|
Kathleen A. Dennis
†
|
|
|
2,387
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
241,500
|
|
|
Manuel H. Johnson
|
|
|
2,643
|
|
|
|
3,926
|
|
|
|
273,000
|
|
|
Joseph J. Kearns
(3)
|
|
|
2,791
|
|
|
|
4,146
|
|
|
|
312,000
|
|
|
Michael F. Klein
†
|
|
|
2,387
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
241,500
|
|
|
Michael E. Nugent
|
|
|
4,099
|
|
|
|
6,088
|
|
|
|
420,000
|
|
|
W. Allen Reed
(2)(3)†
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
181,125
|
|
|
Fergus Reid
(3)
|
|
|
2,347
|
|
|
|
3,485
|
|
|
|
274,750
|
|
|
Name of Interested Trustee
|
|
James F. Higgins
|
|
|
2,055
|
|
|
|
3,052
|
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
|
(1) Includes all amounts paid for serving as director/trustee of the funds, as well as serving as Chairperson of the Boards or a Chairperson of a Committee or Sub-Committee.
(2) The amounts shown in these columns represent the aggregate compensation before deferral with respect to each Fund's fiscal year. The following Trustees deferred compensation from a Fund during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013: Active Assets Institutional Money Trust: Mr. Reed, $1,311.
(3) The amounts shown in this column represent the aggregate compensation paid by all of the funds in the Fund Complex as of December 31, 2012 before deferral by the Trustees under the DC Plan. As of December 31, 2011, the value (including interest) of the deferral accounts across the Fund Complex for Messrs. Kearns, Reed and Reid pursuant to the deferred compensation plan was $594,589, $969,468 and $619,208, respectively. Because the funds in the Fund Complex have different fiscal year ends, the amounts shown in this column are presented on a calendar year basis.
† Messrs. Bowman, Klein, Reed and Ms. Dennis do not serve on the Board of Trustees of Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust.
Prior to December 31, 2003, 49 of the Morgan Stanley Funds (the "Adopting Funds"), not including the Funds, had adopted a retirement program under which an Independent Trustee who retired after serving for at least five years as an Independent Trustee of any such fund (an "Eligible Trustee") would have been entitled to retirement payments, based on factors such as length of service, upon reaching the eligible retirement age. On December 31, 2003, the amount of accrued retirement benefits for each Eligible Trustee was frozen, and will be payable, together with a return of 8% per annum, at or following each such Eligible Trustee's retirement as shown in the table below.
The following table illustrates the retirement benefits accrued to the Funds' Independent Trustees by the Adopting Funds for the calendar year ended December 31, 2012, and the estimated retirement benefits for the Independent Trustees, from the Adopting Funds for each calendar year following retirement. Only the Trustees listed below participated in the retirement program.
Name of Independent Trustee
|
|
Retirement benefits accrued as
fund expenses
By all Adopting
Funds
|
|
Estimated annual benefits upon
retirement
(1)
From all Adopting
Funds
|
|
Michael Bozic
|
|
$
|
42,107
|
|
|
$
|
43,940
|
|
|
Manuel H. Johnson
|
|
|
30,211
|
|
|
|
64,338
|
|
|
Michael E. Nugent
|
|
|
6,804
|
|
|
|
57,539
|
|
|
(1) Total compensation accrued under the retirement plan, together with a return of 8% per annum, will be paid annually commencing upon retirement and continuing for the remainder of the Trustee's life.
24
IV. CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF SECURITIES
The following owned beneficially or of record 5% or more of the outstanding shares of Active Assets Institutional Money Trust as of October 1, 2013: Morgan Stanley & Co., Harborside Financial Center, Plaza II, 3rd Floor, Jersey City, NJ 07311 100.00%.
The following owned beneficially or of record 5% or more of the outstanding shares of Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust as of October 1, 2013: Morgan Stanley & Co., Harborside Financial Center, Plaza II, 3rd Floor, Jersey City, NJ 07311 100.00%.
The percentage ownership of shares of the Funds change from time to time depending on purchases and redemptions by shareholders and the total number of shares outstanding.
As of the date of this
SAI
, the aggregate number of shares of beneficial interest of each Fund owned by the Fund's officers and Trustees as a group was less than 1% of each Fund's shares of beneficial interest outstanding.
V. INVESTMENT ADVISORY AND OTHER SERVICES
A. Adviser and Administrator
The Adviser to each Fund is Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc., a Delaware corporation, whose address is 522 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10036. The Adviser is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley, a Delaware corporation traded on the NYSE under the symbol "MS." Morgan Stanley is a preeminent global financial services firm engaged in securities trading and brokerage activities, as well as providing investment banking, research and analysis, financing and financial advisory services.
Pursuant to an Investment Advisory Agreement (the "Investment Advisory Agreement") with the Adviser, each Fund has retained the Adviser to manage and/or oversee the investment of the Fund's assets, including the placing of orders for the purchase and sale of portfolio securities. Each Fund pays the Adviser monthly compensation calculated daily by applying the annual rate of 0.10% to the average daily net assets of the Fund determined as of the close of each business day.
Administration services are provided to each Fund by Morgan Stanley Services Company Inc. ("Administrator"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Adviser, pursuant to a separate administration agreement ("Administration Agreement") entered into by the Fund with the Administrator. Each Fund pays the Administrator monthly compensation of 0.05% of daily net assets.
The Adviser and Administrator have contractually agreed, under each Fund's respective Investment Advisory Agreement and Administration Agreement, to assume Fund operating expenses, excluding certain investment related expenses, taxes, interest and other extraordinary expenses (including litigation), and to waive the compensation provided under each agreement to the extent such operating expenses and compensation exceed on an annualized basis 0.20% of the average daily net assets of each Fund. The Adviser and the Administrator also have agreed to waive and/or reimburse all or a portion of each Fund's advisory fee and administration fee, respectively, to the extent that total expenses exceed total income on a daily basis. These fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements will continue for at least one year or until such time as the Board of Trustees acts to discontinue all or a portion of such waivers and/or expense reimbursements when it deems such action is appropriate. In addition to the foregoing waivers, the Adviser and Administrator have agreed to assume all operating expenses of Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust, excluding certain investment related expenses, taxes, interest and other extraordinary expenses (including litigation), and to waive all or a portion of Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust's advisory fee and administration fee to the extent that such expenses and fees on an annualized basis exceed 0.10% when assets of the Fund are between $250-$500 million; 0.15% when assets of the Fund are between $500-$750 million; and 0.20% when assets of the Fund are over $750 million. These fee waivers and/or reimbursements are voluntary will continue for at least one year or until such time as the Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust's Board of Trustees acts to discontinue all or a portion of such waivers and/or expense reimbursements when it deems such action is appropriate. These arrangements had no effect during the most recent fiscal period.
The following table reflects for each Fund (i) the advisory fee paid; and (ii) the advisory fee waived and/or affiliated rebates for each of the past three fiscal years ended June 30, 2011, 2012 and 2013.
25
|
|
Advisory Fees Paid
(After Fee Waivers and/or
Affiliated Rebates)
|
|
Advisory Fees Waived
|
|
Affiliated Rebates
|
|
Name of Fund
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
Active Assets
Institutional
Money Trust
|
|
$
|
817,095
|
|
|
$
|
1,043,918
|
|
|
$
|
1,046,400
|
|
|
$
|
4,826
|
|
|
$
|
145,080
|
|
|
$
|
25,581
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
Active Assets
Institutional
Government
Securities Trust
|
|
|
974,084
|
|
|
|
610,859
|
|
|
|
1,157,470
|
|
|
|
110,103
|
|
|
|
775,708
|
|
|
|
420,551
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2011, 2012 and 2013 each Fund paid compensation under its Administration Agreement as follows (no administrative fees were waived):
|
|
Compensation Paid for the Fiscal Year
Ended June 30,
|
|
Name of Fund
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
Active Assets Institutional Money Trust
|
|
$
|
410,960
|
|
|
$
|
594,499
|
|
|
$
|
535,991
|
|
|
Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust
|
|
|
542,094
|
|
|
|
693,283
|
|
|
|
789,011
|
|
|
Under a Sub-Administration Agreement between the Administrator and State Street Bank and Trust Company ("State Street"), State Street provides certain administrative services to the Funds. For such services, the Administrator pays State Street a portion of the fee the Administrator receives from each Fund.
B. Principal Underwriter
Each Fund's principal underwriter is the Distributor (which has the same address as the Adviser). In this capacity, each Fund's shares are distributed by the Distributor. The Distributor has entered into a selected dealer agreement with Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and Morgan Stanley & Co., which, through their own sales organizations, sell shares of each Fund. In addition, the Distributor may enter into similar agreements with other selected broker-dealers. The Distributor, a Delaware corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley.
The Distributor bears all expenses it may incur in providing services under each Distribution Agreement. These expenses include the payment of commissions for sales of the Funds' shares and incentive compensation to Financial Advisors, the cost of educational and/or business-related trips, and educational and/or promotional and business-related expenses. The Distributor also pays certain expenses in connection with the distribution of each Fund's shares, including the costs of preparing, printing and distributing advertising or promotional materials, and the costs of printing and distributing prospectuses and supplements thereto used in connection with the offering and sale of each Fund's shares. Each Fund bears the costs of initial typesetting, printing and distribution of prospectuses and supplements thereto to shareholders. Each Fund also bears the costs of registering the Fund and its shares under federal and state securities laws and pays filing fees in accordance with state securities laws.
Each Fund and the Distributor have agreed to indemnify each other against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. Under each Distribution Agreement, the Distributor uses its best efforts in rendering services to each Fund, but in the absence of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of its obligations, the Distributor is not liable to the Funds or any of their shareholders for any error of judgment or mistake of law or for any act or omission or for any losses sustained by the Funds or their shareholders.
C. Services Provided by the Adviser and Administrator
The Adviser manages the investment of each Fund's assets, including the placing of orders for the purchase and sale of portfolio securities. The Adviser obtains and evaluates the information and advice relating to the economy, securities markets and specific securities as it considers necessary or useful to continuously manage the assets of each Fund in a manner consistent with its investment objective.
Under the terms of each Administration Agreement, the Administrator maintains certain of each Fund's books and records and furnishes, at its own expense, the office space, facilities, equipment, clerical help and bookkeeping as each Fund may reasonably require in the conduct of its business. The Administrator also assists in the preparation of prospectuses, proxy statements and reports required to
26
be filed with federal and state securities commissions (except insofar as the participation or assistance of the independent registered public accounting firm and attorneys is, in the opinion of the Administrator, necessary or desirable). The Administrator also bears the cost of telephone service, heat, light, power and other utilities provided to the Funds.
Expenses not expressly assumed by the Adviser under each Investment Advisory Agreement or by the Administrator under each Administration Agreement or by the Distributor will be paid by the applicable Fund. Such expenses include, but are not limited to: charges and expenses of any registrar, custodian, stock transfer and dividend disbursing agent; brokerage commissions; taxes; engraving and printing share certificates; registration costs of the Funds and their shares under federal and state securities laws; the cost and expense of printing, including typesetting, and distributing prospectuses of each Fund and supplements thereto to the Funds' shareholders; all expenses of shareholders' and Trustees' meetings and of preparing, printing and mailing of proxy statements and reports to shareholders; fees and travel expenses of Trustees or members of any advisory board or committee who are not employees of the Adviser or any corporate affiliate of the Adviser; all expenses incident to any dividend, withdrawal or redemption options; charges and expenses of any outside service used for pricing of each Fund's shares; fees and expenses of legal counsel, including counsel to the Trustees who are not interested persons of the Funds or of the Adviser (not including compensation or expenses of attorneys who are employees of the Adviser); fees and expenses of each Fund's independent registered public accounting firm; membership dues of industry associations; interest on either Fund borrowings; postage; insurance premiums on property or personnel (including officers and Trustees) of each Fund which inure to its benefit; extraordinary expenses (including, but not limited to, legal claims and liabilities and litigation costs and any indemnification relating thereto); and all other costs of each Fund's operation.
Each Investment Advisory Agreement provides that in the absence of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of its obligations thereunder, the Adviser is not liable to either Fund or any of its investors for any act or omission by the Adviser or for any losses sustained by either Fund or its investors.
Each Investment Advisory Agreement will remain in effect from year to year, provided continuance of each Investment Advisory Agreement is approved at least annually by the vote of the holders of a majority, as defined in the Investment Company Act, of the outstanding shares of the applicable Fund, or by the Trustees; provided that in either event such continuance is approved annually by the vote of a majority of the Independent Trustees.
Each Administration Agreement provides that in the absence of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of its obligations thereunder, the Administrator is not liable to the Funds or any of its investors for any act or omission by the Administrator or for any losses sustained by the Funds or their investors. Each Administration Agreement will continue unless terminated by either party by written notice delivered to the other party within 30 days.
D. Other Service Providers
(1) Transfer Agent/Dividend Disbursing Agent
Boston Financial Data Services, Inc., 2000 Crown Colony Drive, Quincy, Massachusetts 02169-0953, is the Transfer Agent for the Funds' shares and the Dividend Disbursing Agent for payment of dividends and distributions on Fund shares.
(2) Custodian and Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
State Street Bank and Trust Company, One Lincoln Street, Boston, MA 02111, is the Custodian of each Fund's assets. Any of the Funds' cash balances with the Custodian in excess of $250,000 (a temporary increase from $100,000, which is due to expire on December 31, 2013) are unprotected by federal deposit insurance. These balances may, at times, be substantial.
Ernst & Young LLP, located at 200 Clarendon Street, Boston, MA 02116-5021, is the independent registered public accounting firm of each Fund. Each Fund's independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing the annual financial statements.
E. Codes of Ethics
The Funds, the Adviser and the Distributor have each adopted a Code of Ethics pursuant to Rule 17j-1 under the Investment Company Act. The Codes of Ethics are designed to detect and prevent
27
improper personal trading. The Codes of Ethics permit personnel subject to the Codes to invest in securities, including securities that may be purchased, sold or held by the Funds, subject to a number of restrictions and controls, including prohibitions against purchases of securities in an initial public offering and a preclearance requirement with respect to personal securities transactions.
F. Proxy Voting Policy and Proxy Voting Record
The Board of Trustees believes that the voting of proxies on securities held by each Fund is an important element of the overall investment process. As such, the Trustees have delegated the responsibility to vote such proxies to MSIM.
A copy of MSIM's Proxy Voting Policy ("Proxy Policy") is attached hereto as Appendix A. In addition, a copy of the Proxy Policy, as well as each Fund's most recent proxy voting record for the 12-month period ended June 30, as filed with the SEC are available without charge on our web site at www.morganstanley.com/im. Each Fund's proxy voting record is also available without charge on the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov.
G. Revenue Sharing
The Adviser and/or Distributor may pay compensation, out of their own funds and not as an expense of the Funds, to Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC in connection with the sale, distribution, marketing and retention of Fund shares and/or shareholder servicing. For example, the Adviser or the Distributor may pay additional compensation to Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC for, among other things, promoting the sale and distribution of Fund shares, providing access to various programs, mutual fund platforms or preferred or recommended mutual fund lists that may be offered by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, granting the Distributor access to Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC's financial advisors and consultants, providing assistance in the ongoing education and training of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC's financial personnel, furnishing marketing support, maintaining share balances and/or for sub-accounting, recordkeeping, administrative, shareholder or transaction processing services. Such payments are in addition to any distribution fees, shareholder service fees and/or transfer agency fees that may be payable by the Funds. The additional payments may be based on various factors, including level of sales (based on gross or net sales or some specified minimum sales or some other similar criteria related to sales of the Funds and/or some or all other Morgan Stanley Funds), amount of assets invested by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC's customers (which could include current or aged assets of the Funds and/or some or all other Morgan Stanley Funds), amount of assets invested by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC's customers (which could include current or aged assets of the Fund and/or some or all other Morgan Stanley Funds), a Fund's advisory fees, some other agreed upon amount, or other measures as determined from time to time by the Adviser and/or Distributor.
These payments currently include the following amounts, which are paid in accordance with the applicable compensation structure:
(1) On Fund shares held directly in traditional brokerage accounts with Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC or held in non-Morgan Stanley accounts where Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC is designated by purchasers as broker-dealer of record, an ongoing annual fee in an amount up to 0.05% of the total average monthly net asset value of such shares; and
(2) On Fund shares held in an account through certain 401(k) platforms in Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC's Corporate Retirement Solutions, an ongoing annual fee in an amount up to 0.20% of the total average monthly net asset value of such shares.
The prospect of receiving, or the receipt of, additional compensation, as described above, by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC may provide Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and/or its financial advisors or other salespersons, with an incentive to favor sales of shares of the Funds over other investment options with respect to which Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC does not receive additional compensation (or receives lower levels of additional compensation). These payment arrangements, however, will not change the price that an investor pays for shares of the Funds or the amount a Fund receives to invest on behalf of an investor. Investors may wish to take such payment arrangements into account when considering and evaluating any recommendations relating to Fund shares and should review carefully any disclosure provided by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC as to its compensation.
28
VI. BROKERAGE ALLOCATION AND OTHER PRACTICES
A. Brokerage Transactions
Subject to the general supervision of the Trustees, the Adviser is responsible for decisions to buy and sell securities for each Fund, the selection of brokers and dealers to effect the transactions, and the negotiation of brokerage commissions, if any. Purchases and sales of portfolio securities are normally transacted through issuers, underwriters or major dealers in U.S. government securities acting as principals. Such transactions are generally made on a net basis and do not involve payment of brokerage commissions. The cost of securities purchased from an underwriter usually includes a commission paid by the issuer to the underwriters; transactions with dealers normally reflect the spread between bid and asked prices.
Pursuant to orders issued by the SEC, the Funds are permitted to engage in principal transactions, subject to certain conditions, with Morgan Stanley & Co., which is a broker-dealer affiliated with the Fund's Adviser.
During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, the Active Assets Institutional Money Trust did not effect any principal transactions with Morgan Stanley & Co. During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012 and 2013, the Active Assets Institutional Money Trust effected principal transactions with Morgan Stanley & Co.
During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, the Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust did not effect any principal transactions with Morgan Stanley & Co. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 the Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust effected principal transactions with Morgan Stanley & Co.
B. Commissions
Brokerage transactions in securities listed on exchanges or admitted to unlisted trading privileges may be effected through Morgan Stanley & Co. and other affiliated brokers and dealers. In order for an affiliated broker or dealer to effect any portfolio transactions on an exchange for either Fund, the commissions, fees or other remuneration received by the affiliated broker or dealer must be reasonable and fair compared to the commissions, fees or other remuneration paid to other brokers in connection with comparable transactions involving similar securities being purchased or sold on an exchange during a comparable period of time. This standard would allow the affiliated broker or dealer to receive no more than the remuneration which would be expected to be received by an unaffiliated broker in a commensurate arm's-length transaction. Furthermore, the Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, have adopted procedures which are reasonably designed to provide that any commissions, fees or other remuneration paid to an affiliated broker or dealer are consistent with the foregoing standard. The Funds do not reduce the management fee they pay to the Adviser by any amount of the brokerage commissions they may pay to an affiliated broker or dealer.
During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2011, 2012 and 2013, the Funds did not pay any brokerage commissions or concessions.
During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2011, 2012 and 2013, the Funds did not pay any brokerage commissions to an affiliated broker or dealer.
C. Brokerage Selection
The policy of each Fund regarding purchases and sales of securities for its portfolio is that primary consideration will be given to obtaining the most favorable prices and efficient executions of transactions. The Adviser is prohibited from directing brokerage transactions on the basis of the referral of clients or the sale of shares of investment companies for which it acts as investment adviser. Consistent with this policy, when securities transactions are effected on a stock exchange, the Funds' policy is to pay commissions which are considered fair and reasonable without necessarily determining that the lowest possible commissions are paid in all circumstances. The Funds believe that a requirement to always seek the lowest possible commission cost could impede effective portfolio management and preclude the Fund and the Adviser from obtaining a high quality of brokerage research services.
In seeking to implement the Funds' policies, the Adviser effects transactions with those broker-dealers that the Adviser believes provide prompt execution of orders in an effective manner at the most favorable prices. The Adviser may place portfolio transactions with those broker-dealers that also furnish research
29
and other services to the Funds or the Adviser. Services provided may include certain research services (as described below) as well as effecting securities transactions and performing functions incidental thereto (such as clearance, settlement and custody).
The Adviser and its affiliated investment advisers have established commission sharing arrangements under a commission management program (the "Commission Management Program" or "CMP"), pursuant to which execution and research costs or a portion of those costs are decoupled in accordance with applicable laws, rules and regulations. Under the CMP, the Adviser and its affiliated investment advisers select approved equity brokers (which include the Adviser's affiliates) for execution services, and after accumulation of commissions with such brokers, the Adviser and/or its affiliated investment advisers instruct these approved equity brokers to pay for eligible research provided by any executing brokers or third-party research providers on MSIM's and its affiliated investment advisers' Approved Research Provider List, which are selected independently by a Research Services Committee of the Adviser and its affiliated investment advisers. Generally, the Adviser and its affiliated investment advisers will direct the approved equity broker to record research credits based upon a previously agreed-upon allocation and will periodically instruct the approved equity broker to direct specified dollar amounts from that pool to pay for eligible research services provided by third-party research providers and executing brokers. The research credits are pooled among the Adviser and its affiliated investment advisers and allocated on behalf of both the Adviser and its affiliated investment advisers. Likewise, the research services obtained under the CMP are shared among the Adviser and its affiliated investment advisers.
Selection of approved equity brokers for execution is based on three main criteria: access to liquidity, provision of capital and quality of execution. Under the CMP, each approved equity broker is responsible for the payment of fees for research services and obtains the research services pursuant to written agreements between the approved equity broker and the third-party research provider.
For those costs not decoupled, but retained by broker-dealers, the Adviser also effects transactions with brokers which directly pay for research services provided by those brokers in accordance with Section 28(e) of the Exchange Act. Such transactions include equity transactions and may include fixed-income transactions effected on an agency basis.
Transactions involving client accounts managed by two or more affiliated investment advisers may be aggregated and executed using the services of broker-dealers that provide third-party benefits/research so long as: (i) all client accounts involved in the transaction benefit from one or more of the services offered by such broker-dealer; and (ii) each affiliated investment adviser has approved the use of such broker-dealer and the services provided thereby.
The research services received include those of the nature described above and other services which aid the Adviser in fulfilling its investment decision-making responsibilities, including (a) furnishing advice as to the value of securities, the advisability of investing in, purchasing or selling securities, and the availability of securities or purchasers or sellers of securities; and (b) furnishing analyses and reports concerning issuers, industries, securities, economic factors and trends, portfolio strategy and the performance of accounts. Where a particular item has both research and non-research related uses (such as proxy services where both research services and services relating to the administration of the proxy itself are provided), the Adviser will make a reasonable allocation of the cost of the item between research and non-research uses and will only pay for the portion of the cost allocated to research uses with client brokerage transactions. Research services furnished or paid for by brokers through whom the Adviser effects transactions for a particular account may be used by the Adviser or its affiliated investment advisers in servicing their other accounts, and not all such services may be used for the benefit of the client which pays the brokerage commission that results in the receipt of such research services. Commissions paid to brokers providing research services may be higher than those charged by brokers not providing such services.
The Adviser and its affiliated investment advisers make a good faith determination of the value of research services in accordance with Section 28(e) of the Exchange Act, UK Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority Rules and other relevant regulatory requirements.
Certain investment professionals and other employees of the Adviser are also officers of affiliated investment advisers and may provide investment advisory services to clients of such affiliated investment advisers. The Adviser's personnel also provide research and trading support to personnel of certain
30
affiliated investment advisers. Research related costs may be shared by affiliated investment advisers and may benefit the clients of such affiliated investment advisers. Research services that benefit the Adviser may be received in connection with commissions generated by clients of its affiliated investment advisers. Similarly, research services received in connection with commissions generated by the Adviser's clients may benefit affiliated investment advisers and their clients. Moreover, research services provided by broker-dealers through which the Adviser effects transactions for a particular account may be used by the Adviser and/or an affiliated investment adviser in servicing its other accounts and not all such research services may be used for the benefit of the particular client, which pays the brokerage commission giving rise to the receipt of such research services.
The Adviser and certain of its affiliates currently serve as an investment adviser to a number of clients, including other investment companies, and may in the future act as investment adviser to others. It is the practice of the Adviser, and its affiliates, to cause purchase and sale transactions (including transactions in certain initial and secondary public offerings) to be allocated among clients whose assets they manage (including the Funds) in such manner they deem equitable. In making such allocations among the Funds and other client accounts, various factors may be considered, including the respective investment objectives, the relative size of portfolio holdings of the same or comparable securities, the availability of cash for investment, the size of investment commitments generally held and the opinions of the persons responsible for managing the portfolios of the Funds and other client accounts. The Adviser and its affiliates may operate one or more order placement facilities and each facility will implement order allocation in accordance with the procedures described above. From time to time, each facility may transact in a security at the same time as other facilities are trading in that security.
D. Regular Broker-Dealers
During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, Active Assets Institutional Money Trust purchased secu-rities issued by Deutsche Bank Financial LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, and National Australia Bank Limited, which were among the ten brokers or ten dealers which executed transactions for or with Active Assets Institutional Money Trust in the largest dollar amounts during the period. At June 30, 2013, Active Assets Institutional Money Trust held securities issued by Deutsche Bank Financial LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and National Australia Bank Limited with market values of $24,100,000, $23,000,000 and $39,900,000, respectively.
During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust did not purchase any securities issued by issuers, which were among the ten brokers or ten dealers which executed transactions for or with Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust in the largest dollar amounts during the period. At June 30, 2013, the Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust did not own any securities issued by any such issuers.
VII. CAPITAL STOCK AND OTHER SECURITIES
The shareholders of each Fund are entitled to a full vote for each full share of beneficial interest held. The Funds are authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest. All shares of beneficial interest of each Fund are of $0.01 par value and are equal as to earnings, assets and voting privileges.
Each Fund's Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to authorize the creation of additional series of shares (the proceeds of which would be invested in separate, independently managed portfolios) and additional Classes of shares within any series. The Trustees have not presently authorized any such additional series or Classes of shares other than as set forth in the
Prospectus
.
The Funds are not required to hold annual meetings of shareholders and in ordinary circumstances the Funds do not intend to hold such meetings. The Trustees may call special meetings of shareholders for action by shareholder vote as may be required by the Investment Company Act or the respective Fund's Declaration of Trust. Under certain circumstances, the Trustees may be removed by the actions of the Trustees. In addition, under certain circumstances, the shareholders may call a meeting to remove the Trustees and the Funds are required to provide assistance in communication with shareholders about such a meeting. The voting rights of shareholders are not cumulative, so that holders of more than 50% of the shares voting can, if they choose, elect all Trustees being selected, while the holders of the remaining shares would be unable to elect any Trustees.
31
Under Massachusetts law, shareholders of a business trust may, under certain limited circumstances, be held personally liable as partners for the obligations of each Fund. However, each Declaration of Trust contains an express disclaimer of shareholder liability for acts or obligations of the respective Fund, requires that notice of such Fund obligations include such disclaimer, and provides for indemnification out of the Fund's property for any shareholder held personally liable for the obligations of the Fund. Thus, the risk of a shareholder incurring financial loss on account of shareholder liability is limited to circumstances in which a Fund itself would be unable to meet its obligations. Given the above limitations on shareholder personal liability, and the nature of each Fund's assets and operations, the possibility of a Fund being unable to meet its obligations is remote and thus, in the opinion of Massachusetts counsel to the Funds, the risk to each Fund's shareholders of personal liability is remote.
The Trustees themselves have the power to alter the number and the terms of office of the Trustees (as provided for in each Fund's Declaration of Trust), and they may at any time lengthen or shorten their own terms or make their terms of unlimited duration and appoint their own successors, provided that always at least a majority of the Trustees has been elected by the shareholders of the respective Fund.
VIII. PURCHASE, REDEMPTION AND PRICING OF SHARES
A. Purchase/Redemption of Shares
Information concerning how Fund shares are offered to the public (and how they are redeemed) is provided in the Funds'
Prospectus
.
Suspension of Redemptions.
Redemptions are not made on days during which the NYSE is closed. In addition, when the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association recommends that the securities markets close early, payments with respect to redemption requests received subsequent to the recommended close will be made the next business day. The right of redemption may be suspended and the payment therefore may be postponed for more than seven days during any period when (a) the NYSE is closed for other than customary weekends or holidays; (b) the SEC determines trading on the NYSE is restricted; (c) the SEC determines an emergency exists as a result of which disposal by a Fund of securities owned by it is not reasonably practicable or it is not reasonably practicable for a Fund to fairly determine the value of its net assets; or (d) the SEC, by order, so permits.
Transfer Agent as Agent.
With respect to the redemption of the Funds' shares, the application of proceeds to the purchase of new shares in a Fund or any other Morgan Stanley Funds and the general administration of the exchange privilege, the Transfer Agent acts as agent for the Distributor and for the shareholder's authorized broker-dealer, if any, in the performance of such functions. With respect to exchanges, redemptions or repurchases, the Transfer Agent is liable for its own negligence and not for the default or negligence of its correspondents or for losses in transit. The Funds are not liable for any default or negligence of the Transfer Agent, the Distributor or any authorized broker-dealer.
B. Offering Price
The price of each Fund's shares, called "net asset value," is based on the value of each respective Fund's portfolio securities.
Each Fund utilizes the amortized cost method in valuing its portfolio securities for purposes of determining the net asset value of its shares. Each Fund utilizes the amortized cost method in valuing its portfolio securities even though the portfolio securities may increase or decrease in market value, generally in connection with changes in interest rates. The amortized cost method of valuation involves valuing a security at its cost at the time of purchase adjusted by a constant amortization to maturity of any discount or premium, regardless of the impact of fluctuating interest rates on the market value of the instrument. While this method provides certainty in valuation, it may result in periods during which value, as determined by amortized cost, is higher or lower than the price a Fund would receive if it sold the investment. During such periods, the yield to investors in each Fund may differ somewhat from that obtained in a similar company which uses marked-to-market values for all of its portfolio securities. For example, if the use of amortized cost resulted in a lower (higher) aggregate portfolio value on a particular day, a prospective investor in either Fund would be able to obtain a somewhat higher (lower) yield than would result from investment in such a similar company and existing investors would receive less (more)
32
investment income. The purpose of this method of calculation is to facilitate the maintenance of a constant net asset value per share of $1.00.
The use of the amortized cost method to value the portfolio securities of each Fund and the maintenance of the per share net asset value of $1.00 is permitted pursuant to Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act (the "Rule") and is conditioned on its compliance with various conditions contained in the Rule including: (a) the Trustees are obligated, as a particular responsibility within the overall duty of care owed to the Funds' shareholders, to establish procedures reasonably designed, taking into account current market conditions and each Fund's investment objectives, to stabilize the net asset value per share as computed for the purpose of distribution and redemption at $1.00 per share; (b) the procedures include (i) calculation, at such intervals as the Trustees determine are appropriate and as are reasonable in light of current market conditions, of the deviation, if any, between net asset value per share using amortized cost to value portfolio securities and net asset value per share based upon available market quotations with respect to such portfolio securities; (ii) periodic review by the Trustees of the amount of deviation as well as methods used to calculate it; and (iii) maintenance of written records of the procedures, and the Trustees' considerations made pursuant to them and any actions taken upon such consideration; (c) the Trustees should consider what steps should be taken, if any, in the event of a difference of more than 1/2 of 1% between the two methods of valuation; and (d) the Trustees should take such action as they deem appropriate (such as shortening the average portfolio maturity, realizing gains or losses, withholding dividends or, as provided by the Declaration of Trust, reducing the number of outstanding shares of either Fund) to eliminate or reduce to the extent reasonably practicable material dilution or other unfair results to investors or existing shareholders which might arise from differences between the two method of valuation.
Generally, for purposes of the procedures adopted under the Rule, the maturity of a portfolio security is deemed to be the period remaining (calculated from the trade date or such other date on which a Fund's interest in the instrument is subject to market action) until the date on which in accordance with the terms of the security the principal amount must unconditionally be paid, or in the case of a security called for redemption, the date on which the redemption payment must be made.
A variable rate security that is subject to a demand feature generally is deemed to have a maturity equal to the period remaining until the principal amount can be recovered through demand. A floating rate security that is subject to a demand feature generally is deemed to have a maturity equal to the period remaining until the principal amount can be recovered through demand. The maturity date of adjustable rate government securities and floating rate government securities is specifically addressed under the Rule. If the rate of interest of a variable rate government security is adjusted at intervals not exceeding 397 days, the maturity on that security is deemed to equal the period remaining until the next readjustment date. Floating rate government securities are deemed to have a maturity of one day.
An "NRSRO" is a nationally recognized statistical rating organization. At the time each Fund acquires its investments, they will be rated (or issued by an issuer that is rated with respect to a comparable class of short-term debt obligations) (i) in one of the two highest rating categories for short-term debt obligations assigned by at least two NRSROs; or (ii) if only one NRSRO has issued a rating with respect to such security or issuer at the time a fund purchases or rolls over the security, that NRSRO (the "Requisite NRSROs").
An Eligible Security is generally defined in the Rule to mean (i) a rated security with a remaining maturity of 397 calendar days or less that has received a rating from the Requisite NRSROs in one of the two highest short-term rating categories (within which there may be sub-categories or gradations indicating relative standing); or (ii) an Unrated Security that is of comparable quality to a security meeting the requirements of (1) above, as determined by the Trustees. In addition, in the case of a security that is subject to a Demand Feature or Guarantee: (A) the Guarantee has received a rating from an NRSRO or the Guarantee is issued by a guarantor that has received a rating from an NRSRO with respect to a class of debt obligations (or any debt obligation within that class) that is comparable in priority and security to the Guarantee, unless: (1) the Guarantee is issued by a person that directly or indirectly, controls, is controlled by or is under a common control with the issuer of the security subject to the Guarantee (other than a sponsor or a Special Purpose Entity with respect to an Asset-Backed Security: (2) the security subject to the Guarantee is a repurchase agreement that is Collateralized Fully; or (3) the Guarantee itself is a Government Security and (B) the issuer
33
of the Demand Feature, or another institution, has undertaken promptly to notify the holder of the security in the event the Demand Feature or Guarantee is substituted with another Demand Feature or Guarantee (if such substitution is permissible under the terms of the Demand Feature or Guarantee). Each Fund will limit its investments to securities that meet the requirements for Eligible Securities; however, each Fund may invest in adjustable rate government securities with final maturities in excess of 397 days.
The Rule further requires that the Funds limit its investments to U.S. dollar-denominated instruments which the Trustees determine present minimal credit risks and which are Eligible Securities. As permitted by the Rule, the Trustees have delegated to the Funds' Adviser the authority to determine which securities present minimal credit risks and which unrated securities are comparable in quality to rated securities.
Also, as required by the Rule, each Fund will limit its investments in securities, other than government securities, so that, at the time of purchase: (a) except as further limited in (b) below with regard to certain securities, with respect to 75% of its total assets no more than 5% of its total assets will be invested in the securities of any one issuer; and (b) with respect to Eligible Securities that have received a rating in less than the highest category by any one of the NRSROs whose ratings are used to qualify the security as an Eligible Security or that have been determined to be of comparable quality: (i) no more than 3% in the aggregate of each Fund's total assets in all such securities, (ii) no more than 0.5% of total assets in the securities of any one issuer and (iii) the remaining maturity of any such securities must be 45 days or less.
The presence of a line of credit or other credit facility offered by a bank or other financial institution which guarantees the payment obligation of the issuer, in the event of a default in the payment of principal or interest of an obligation, may be taken into account in determining whether an investment is an Eligible Security, provided that the guarantee itself is an Eligible Security.
The Rule also requires each Fund to maintain a dollar-weighted average portfolio maturity (not more than 60 days) appropriate to its objective of maintaining a stable net asset value of $1.00 per share and precludes the purchase of any instrument with a remaining maturity of more than 397 days. Should the disposition of a portfolio security result in a dollar weighted average portfolio maturity of more than 60 days, the applicable Fund will invest its available cash in such a manner as to reduce such maturity to 60 days or less as soon as is reasonably practicable.
In the unlikely event that a Fund's Board of Trustees are to determine pursuant to Rule 2a-7 that the extent of the deviation between the Fund's amortized cost per share and its market-based NAV per share may result in material dilution or other unfair results to shareholders, the Board will cause the Fund to take such action as it deems appropriate to eliminate or reduce to the extent practicable such dilution or unfair results, including, but not limited to, considering suspending redemption of shares and liquidating the Fund under Rule 22e-3 under the Investment Company Act.
If the Trustees determine that it is no longer in the best interests of a Fund and its shareholders to maintain a stable price of $1 per share or if the Trustees believe that maintaining such price no longer reflects a market-based net asset value per share, the Trustees have the right to change from an amortized cost basis of valuation to valuation based on market quotations. The Funds will notify their respective shareholders of any such change.
IX. TAXATION OF THE FUNDS AND THEIR SHAREHOLDERS
Each Fund generally will make two basic types of distributions: ordinary dividends and long-term capital gain distributions. These two types of distributions are reported differently on a shareholder's income tax return. The tax treatment of the investment activities of the Funds will affect the amount, timing and character of the distributions made by each Fund. The following discussion is only a summary of certain tax considerations generally affecting the Funds and shareholders of the Funds and is not intended as a substitute for careful tax planning. Shareholders are urged to consult their own tax professionals regarding specific questions as to federal, state or local taxes.
Each Fund intends to declare and pay all of its net investment income (and net short-term capital gains, if any) as dividends daily. Dividends are automatically reinvested in additional Fund shares at net asset value. Net investment income, for dividend purposes, includes accrued interest and original issue and market discount, plus or minus any short-term gains or losses realized on sales of portfolio securities,
34
less the amortization of market premium and the estimated expenses of each Fund, respectively. Net income will be calculated immediately prior to the determination of net asset value per share of each Fund.
The Trustees of the Funds may revise the dividend policy or postpone the payment of dividends if a Fund should have or anticipate any large unexpected expense, loss or fluctuation in net assets which, in the opinion of the Trustees, might have a significant adverse effect on shareholders. On occasion, in order to maintain a constant $1.00 per share net asset value, the Trustees may direct that the number of outstanding shares be reduced in each shareholder's account. Such reduction may result in taxable income to a shareholder in excess of the net increase (i.e., dividends, less such reductions), if any, in the shareholder's account for a period of time. Furthermore, such reduction may be realized as a capital loss when the shares are liquidated.
It is each Fund's policy and practice that, if checks for dividends or distributions paid in cash remain uncashed, no interest will accrue on amounts represented by such uncashed checks.
Taxes.
Each Fund has qualified and intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. As such, each Fund will not be subject to federal income tax on its net investment income and capital gains, if any, to the extent that each Fund timely distributes such income and capital gains to its shareholders. If a Fund fails to qualify for any taxable year as a regulated investment company, all of its taxable income will be subject to tax at regular corporate income tax rates without any deduction for distributions to shareholders, and such distributions generally will be taxable to shareholders as ordinary dividends to the extent of the Fund's current and accumulated earnings and profits.
Each Fund generally intends to distribute sufficient income and gains so that it will not pay corporate income tax on its earnings. Each Fund also generally intends to distribute to its shareholders in each calendar year a sufficient amount of ordinary income and capital gains to avoid the imposition of a 4% excise tax. However, a Fund may instead determine to retain all or part of any income or capital gains in any year for reinvestment. In such event, a Fund will pay federal income tax (and possibly excise tax) on such retained income or gains.
Gains or losses on sales of securities by each Fund will generally be long-term capital gains or losses if the securities have a tax holding period of more than one year at the time of such sale. Gains or losses on the sale of securities with a tax holding period of one year or less will be short-term capital gains or losses. Special tax rules may change the normal treatment of gains and losses recognized by a Fund when a Fund invests in options and futures transactions. Those special tax rules can, among other things, affect the treatment of capital gain or loss as long-term or short-term and may result in ordinary income or loss rather than capital gain or loss. The application of these special rules would therefore also affect the character of distributions made by a Fund.
Under certain tax rules, the Funds may be required to accrue a portion of any discount at which certain securities are purchased as income each year even though the Funds receive no payments in cash on the security during the year. To the extent that the Funds invest in such securities, they would be required to pay out such income as an income distribution in order to avoid taxation at the Fund level. Such distributions will be made from the available cash of the Funds or by liquidation of portfolio securities if necessary. If a distribution of cash necessitates the liquidation of portfolio securities, the Adviser will select which securities to sell. The Funds may realize a gain or loss from such sales. In the event the Funds realize net capital gains from such transactions, their shareholders may receive a larger capital gain distribution, if any, than they would in the absence of such transactions.
Taxation of Dividends and Distributions.
Shareholders normally will be subject to federal income tax, and state and/or local income taxes on dividends paid from interest income derived from taxable securities and on distributions of realized net short-term capital gains and long-term capital gains. Interest income and realized net short-term capital gains distributions are taxable to the shareholder as ordinary income regardless of whether the shareholder receives such distributions in additional shares or in cash. Shareholders normally will be subject to federal income taxes, and state and/or local income taxes, on dividends paid from interest income as well as distributions of capital gains realized with respect to both taxable and tax-exempt securities. However, any dividends attributable to interest earned on direct obligations of the U.S. government may be exempt from state and local taxes. Dividends paid from interest income derived from taxable securities and distributions of net short-term capital gains (realized with respect to both taxable and tax-exempt securities) are taxable at ordinary income rates for federal tax
35
purposes. Net long-term capital gains distributions are taxable to the shareholder as long-term capital gains, regardless of how long the shareholder has held the Fund shares and regardless of whether the shareholder receives such distribution in additional shares or in cash. For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012, the maximum individual rate applicable to long-term capital gains is generally either 15% or 20% depending on whether the individual's income exceeds certain threshold amounts.
It is not anticipated that the ordinary dividends or net long-term capital gains distributions will be eligible for the federal dividends received deduction available to corporations.
Shareholders are generally taxed on any income dividend or capital gain distribution from a Fund in the year they are actually distributed. However, if any such dividends or distributions are declared in October, November or December and paid to shareholders of record of such month in January then such amounts will be treated for tax purposes as received by the shareholders on December 31.
Shareholders who are not citizens or residents of the United States and certain foreign entities may be subject to withholding of U.S. tax on distributions made by the Funds of any taxable interest income and short-term capital gains. For taxable years of the Funds beginning before January 1, 2014 (or a later date if extended by the U.S. Congress) the Funds are not required to withhold any amounts with respect to distributions to foreign shareholders that are properly designated by the Funds as "interest-related dividends" or "short-term capital gain dividends," provided that the income would not be subject to federal income tax if earned directly by the foreign shareholder. However, the Funds may withhold on some of these amounts regardless of the fact that they are not required to do so. Prospective investors are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the specific tax consequences discussed above.
Effective July 1, 2014, the Funds will be required to withhold U.S. tax (at a 30% rate) on payments of taxable dividends and (effective January 1, 2017) redemption proceeds made to certain non-U.S. entities that fail to comply (or be deemed compliant) with extensive new reporting and withholding requirements designed to inform the U.S. Department of the Treasury of U.S.-owned foreign investment accounts. Shareholders may be requested to provide additional information to the Funds to enable the Funds to determine whether withholding is required.
Foreign shareholders may also be subject to U.S. estate tax with respect to their Fund shares.
After the end of each calendar year, shareholders will be sent information on their dividends and capital gain distributions for tax purposes, including the portion taxable as ordinary income and the portion taxable as long-term capital gains.
Purchases and Redemptions and Exchanges of Fund Shares.
Shareholders normally will be subject to federal income taxes and state and/or local income taxes on the sale or disposition of Fund shares. In general, a sale of shares results in capital gain or loss, and for individual shareholders, is taxable at a federal rate dependent upon the length of time the shares were held. A redemption of a shareholder's Fund shares is normally treated as a sale for tax purposes. Gain or loss on the sale or redemption of shares in a Fund is measured by the difference between the amount received and the tax basis of the shares. Fund shares held for a period of one-year or less at the time of such sale or redemption will, for tax purposes, generally result in short-term capital gains or losses and those held for more than one year generally will result in long-term capital gains or losses. As described above, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012, the maximum individual rate applicable to long-term capital gains is generally either 15% or 20%, depending on whether the individual's income exceeds certain threshold amounts. However, as each Fund intends to maintain its share price at $1.00, preserving the principal value of a shareholder's investment, a shareholder generally will not realize gain or loss on the sale or redemption of shares in a Fund.
Medicare Tax.
For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012, an additional 3.8% Medicare tax will be imposed on certain net investment income (including ordinary dividends and capital gain distributions received from a Fund and net gains from redemptions or other taxable dispositions of Fund shares) of U.S. individuals, estates and trusts to the extent that such person's "modified adjusted gross income" (in the case of an individual) or "adjusted gross income" (in the case of an estate or trust) exceeds certain threshold amounts.
36
X. UNDERWRITERS
Each Fund's shares are offered to the public on a continuous basis. The Distributor, as the principal underwriter of the shares, has certain obligations under the Distribution Agreement concerning the distribution of the shares. These obligations and the compensation the Distributor receives are described above in the section titled "Principal Underwriter."
XI. PERFORMANCE DATA
Active Assets Institutional Money Trust's current yield for the seven days ended June 30, 2013 was 0.01%. The seven day effective annual yield on June 30, 2013 was 0.01%, assuming daily compounding.
Active Assets Institutional Government Securities Trust's current yield for the seven days ended June 30, 2013 was 0.01%. The seven day effective annual yield on June 30, 2013 was 0.01%, assuming daily compounding.
XII. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Funds' audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, including notes thereto, and the reports of Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, are herein incorporated by reference to the Funds'
Annual Reports to Shareholders
. Copies of the Funds'
Annual Reports to Shareholders
must accompany the delivery of this
SAI
.
XIII. FUND COUNSEL
Dechert LLP, located at 1095 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10036, acts as the Funds' legal counsel.
*****
This
SAI
and the
Prospectus
do not contain all of the information set forth in the
Registration Statements
the Funds have filed with the SEC. The complete
Registration Statement
for each Fund may be obtained from the SEC.
37
Appendix A
MORGAN STANLEY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
PROXY VOTING POLICY AND PROCEDURES
I. POLICY STATEMENT
Morgan Stanley Investment Management's ("MSIM") policy and procedures for voting proxies ("Policy") with respect to securities held in the accounts of clients applies to those MSIM entities that provide discretionary investment management services and for which an MSIM entity has authority to vote proxies. This Policy is reviewed and updated as necessary to address new and evolving proxy voting issues and standards.
The MSIM entities covered by this Policy currently include the following: Morgan Stanley AIP GP LP, Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc., Morgan Stanley Investment Management Limited, Morgan Stanley Investment Management Company, Morgan Stanley Asset & Investment Trust Management Co., Limited, Morgan Stanley Investment Management Private Limited and Private Investment Partners Inc. (each an "MSIM Affiliate" and collectively referred to as the "MSIM Affiliates" or as "we" below).
Each MSIM Affiliate will use its best efforts to vote proxies as part of its authority to manage, acquire and dispose of account assets. With respect to the MSIM registered management investment companies (the "MSIM Funds"), each MSIM Affiliate will vote proxies under this Policy pursuant to authority granted under its applicable investment advisory agreement or, in the absence of such authority, as authorized by the Board of Directors/Trustees of the MSIM Funds. A MSIM Affiliate will not vote proxies unless the investment management or investment advisory agreement explicitly authorizes the MSIM Affiliate to vote proxies. MSIM Affiliates will vote proxies in a prudent and diligent manner and in the best interests of clients, including beneficiaries of and participants in a client's benefit plan(s) for which the MSIM Affiliates manage assets, consistent with the objective of maximizing long-term investment returns ("Client Proxy Standard"). In certain situations, a client or its fiduciary may provide an MSIM Affiliate with a proxy voting policy. In these situations, the MSIM Affiliate will comply with the client's policy.
Proxy Research Services
ISS Governance Services ("ISS") and Glass Lewis (together with other proxy research providers as we may retain from time to time, the "Research Providers") are independent advisers that specialize in providing a variety of fiduciary-level proxy-related services to institutional investment managers, plan sponsors, custodians, consultants, and other institutional investors. The services provided include in-depth research, global issuer analysis, and voting recommendations. While we may review and utilize the recommendations of one or more Research Providers in making proxy voting decisions, we are in no way obligated to follow such recommendations. In addition to research, ISS provides vote execution, reporting, and recordkeeping services.
Voting Proxies for Certain Non-U.S. Companies
Voting proxies of companies located in some jurisdictions may involve several problems that can restrict or prevent the ability to vote such proxies or entail significant costs. These problems include, but are not limited to: (i) proxy statements and ballots being written in a language other than English; (ii) untimely and/or inadequate notice of shareholder meetings; (iii) restrictions on the ability of holders outside the issuer's jurisdiction of organization to exercise votes; (iv) requirements to vote proxies in person; (v) the imposition of restrictions on the sale of the securities for a period of time in proximity to the shareholder meeting; and (vi) requirements to provide local agents with power of attorney to facilitate our voting instructions. As a result, we vote clients' non-U.S. proxies on a best efforts basis only, after weighing the costs and benefits of voting such proxies, consistent with the Client Proxy Standard. ISS has been retained to provide assistance in connection with voting non-U.S. proxies.
II. GENERAL PROXY VOTING GUIDELINES
To promote consistency in voting proxies on behalf of its clients, we follow this Policy (subject to any exception set forth herein). The Policy addresses a broad range of issues, and provides general voting parameters on proposals that arise most frequently. However, details of specific proposals vary, and those
A-1
details affect particular voting decisions, as do factors specific to a given company. Pursuant to theprocedures set forth herein, we may vote in a manner that is not in accordance with the following general guidelines, provided the vote is approved by the Proxy Review Committee (see Section III for description) and is consistent with the Client Proxy Standard. Morgan Stanley AIP GP LP will follow the procedures as described in Appendix A.
We endeavor to integrate governance and proxy voting policy with investment goals, using the vote to encourage portfolio companies to enhance long-term shareholder value and to provide a high standard of transparency such that equity markets can value corporate assets appropriately.
We seek to follow the Client Proxy Standard for each client. At times, this may result in split votes, for example when different clients have varying economic interests in the outcome of a particular voting matter (such as a case in which varied ownership interests in two companies involved in a merger results in different stakes in the outcome). We also may split votes at times based on differing views of portfolio managers.
We may abstain on matters for which disclosure is inadequate.
A. Routine Matters.
We generally support routine management proposals. The following are examples of routine management proposals:
• Approval of financial statements and auditor reports if delivered with an unqualified auditor's opinion.
• General updating/corrective amendments to the charter, articles of association or bylaws, unless we believe that such amendments would diminish shareholder rights.
• Most proposals related to the conduct of the annual meeting, with the following exceptions. We generally oppose proposals that relate to "the transaction of such other business which may come before the meeting," and open-ended requests for adjournment. However, where management specifically states the reason for requesting an adjournment and the requested adjournment would facilitate passage of a proposal that would otherwise be supported under this Policy (i.e. an uncontested corporate transaction), the adjournment request will be supported.
We generally support shareholder proposals advocating confidential voting procedures and independent tabulation of voting results.
B. Board of Directors.
1.
Election of directors:
Votes on board nominees can involve balancing a variety of considerations. In vote decisions, we may take into consideration whether the company has a majority voting policy in place that we believe makes the director vote more meaningful. In the absence of a proxy contest, we generally support the board's nominees for director except as follows:
a. We consider withholding support from or voting against a nominee if we believe a direct conflict exists between the interests of the nominee and the public shareholders, including failure to meet fiduciary standards of care and/or loyalty. We may oppose directors where we conclude that actions of directors are unlawful, unethical or negligent. We consider opposing individual board members or an entire slate if we believe the board is entrenched and/or dealing inadequately with performance problems; if we believe the board is acting with insufficient independence between the board and management; or if we believe the board has not been sufficiently forthcoming with information on key governance or other material matters.
b. We consider withholding support from or voting against interested directors if the company's board does not meet market standards for director independence, or if otherwise we believe board independence is insufficient. We refer to prevalent market standards as promulgated by a stock exchange or other authority within a given market (e.g., New York Stock Exchange or Nasdaq rules for most U.S. companies, and The Combined Code on Corporate Governance in the United Kingdom). Thus, for an NYSE company with no controlling shareholder, we would expect that at a minimum a majority of directors should be independent as defined by NYSE. Where we view market standards as inadequate, we may withhold votes based on stronger
A-2
independence standards. Market standards notwithstanding, we generally do not view long board tenure alone as a basis to classify a director as non-independent.
i. At a company with a shareholder or group that controls the company by virtue of a majority economic interest in the company, we have a reduced expectation for board independence, although we believe the presence of independent directors can be helpful, particularly in staffing the audit committee, and at times we may withhold support from or vote against a nominee on the view the board or its committees are not sufficiently independent. In markets where board independence is not the norm (e.g. Japan), however, we consider factors including whether a board of a controlled company includes independent members who can be expected to look out for interests of minority holders.
ii. We consider withholding support from or voting against a nominee if he or she is affiliated with a major shareholder that has representation on a board disproportionate to its economic interest.
c. Depending on market standards, we consider withholding support from or voting against a nominee who is interested and who is standing for election as a member of the company's compensation/remuneration, nominating/governance or audit committee.
d. We consider withholding support or voting against nominees if the term for which they are nominated is excessive. We consider this issue on a market-specific basis.
e. We consider withholding support from or voting against nominees if, in our view, there has been insufficient board renewal (turnover), particularly in the context of extended poor company performance.
f. We consider withholding support from or voting against a nominee standing for election if the board has not taken action to implement generally accepted governance practices for which there is a "bright line" test. For example, in the context of the U.S. market, failure to eliminate a dead hand or slow hand poison pill would be seen as a basis for opposing one or more incumbent nominees.
g. In markets that encourage designated audit committee financial experts, we consider voting against members of an audit committee if no members are designated as such. We also consider voting against the audit committee members if the company has faced financial reporting issues and/or does not put the auditor up for ratification by shareholders.
h. We believe investors should have the ability to vote on individual nominees, and may abstain or vote against a slate of nominees where we are not given the opportunity to vote on individual nominees.
i. We consider withholding support from or voting against a nominee who has failed to attend at least 75% of the nominee's board and board committee meetings within a given year without a reasonable excuse. We also consider opposing nominees if the company does not meet market standards for disclosure on attendance.
j. We consider withholding support from or voting against a nominee who appears overcommitted, particularly through service on an excessive number of boards. Market expectations are incorporated into this analysis; for U.S. boards, we generally oppose election of a nominee who serves on more than six public company boards (excluding investment companies), although we may reference National Association of Corporate Directors guidance suggesting that public company CEOs, for example, should serve no more than two outside boards given the level of time commitment required in their primary job.
2.
Discharge of directors' duties:
In markets where an annual discharge of directors' responsibility is a routine agenda item, we generally support such discharge. However, we may vote against discharge or abstain from voting where there are serious findings of fraud or other unethical behavior for which the individual bears responsibility. The annual discharge of responsibility represents shareholder approval of disclosed actions taken by the board during the year and may make future shareholder action against the board difficult to pursue.
A-3
3.
Board independence:
We generally support U.S. shareholder proposals requiring that a certain percentage (up to 66 2/3%) of the company's board members be independent directors, and promoting all-independent audit, compensation and nominating/governance committees.
4.
Board diversity:
We consider on a case-by-case basis shareholder proposals urging diversity of board membership with respect to social, religious or ethnic group.
5.
Majority voting:
We generally support proposals requesting or requiring majority voting policies in election of directors, so long as there is a carve-out for plurality voting in the case of contested elections.
6.
Proxy access:
We consider on a case-by-case basis shareholder proposals on particular procedures for inclusion of shareholder nominees in company proxy statements.
7.
Reimbursement for dissident nominees:
We generally support well-crafted U.S. shareholder proposals that would provide for reimbursement of dissident nominees elected to a board, as the cost to shareholders in electing such nominees can be factored into the voting decision on those nominees.
8.
Proposals to elect directors more frequently:
In the U.S. public company context, we usually support shareholder and management proposals to elect all directors annually (to "declassify" the board), although we make an exception to this policy where we believe that long-term shareholder value may be harmed by this change given particular circumstances at the company at the time of the vote on such proposal. As indicated above, outside the U.S., we generally support greater accountability to shareholders that comes through more frequent director elections, but recognize that many markets embrace longer term lengths, sometimes for valid reasons given other aspects of the legal context in electing boards.
9.
Cumulative voting:
We generally support proposals to eliminate cumulative voting in the U.S. market context. (Cumulative voting provides that shareholders may concentrate their votes for one or a handful of candidates, a system that can enable a minority bloc to place representation on a board.) U.S. proposals to establish cumulative voting in the election of directors generally will not be supported.
10.
Separation of Chairman and CEO positions:
We vote on shareholder proposals to separate the Chairman and CEO positions and/or to appoint an independent Chairman based in part on prevailing practice in particular markets, since the context for such a practice varies. In many non-U.S. markets, we view separation of the roles as a market standard practice, and support division of the roles in that context. In the U.S., we consider such proposals on a case-by-case basis, considering, among other things, the existing board leadership structure, company performance, and any other evidence of entrenchment or perceived risk that power is overly concentrated in a single individual.
11.
Director retirement age and term limits:
Proposals setting or recommending director retirement ages or director term limits are voted on a case-by-case basis that includes consideration of company performance, the rate of board renewal, evidence of effective individual director evaluation processes, and any indications of entrenchment.
12.
Proposals to limit directors' liability and/or broaden indemnification of officers and directors.
Generally, we will support such proposals provided that an individual is eligible only if he or she has not acted in bad faith, with gross negligence or with reckless disregard of their duties.
C. Statutory Auditor Boards.
The statutory auditor board, which is separate from the main board of directors, plays a role in corporate governance in several markets. These boards are elected by shareholders to provide assurance on compliance with legal and accounting standards and the company's articles of association. We generally vote for statutory auditor nominees if they meet independence standards. In markets that require disclosure on attendance by internal statutory auditors, however, we consider voting against nominees for these positions who failed to attend at least 75% of meetings in the previous year. We also consider opposing nominees if the company does not meet market standards for disclosure on attendance.
A-4
D. Corporate Transactions and Proxy Fights.
We examine proposals relating to mergers, acquisitions and other special corporate transactions (i.e., takeovers, spin-offs, sales of assets, reorganizations, restructurings and recapitalizations) on a case-by-case basis in the interests of each fund or other account. Proposals for mergers or other significant transactions that are friendly and approved by the Research Providers usually are supported if there is no portfolio manager objection. We also analyze proxy contests on a case-by-case basis.
E. Changes in Capital Structure.
1. We generally support the following:
• Management and shareholder proposals aimed at eliminating unequal voting rights, assuming fair economic treatment of classes of shares we hold.
• U.S. management proposals to increase the authorization of existing classes of common stock (or securities convertible into common stock) if: (i) a clear business purpose is stated that we can support and the number of shares requested is reasonable in relation to the purpose for which authorization is requested; and/or (ii) the authorization does not exceed 100% of shares currently authorized and at least 30% of the total new authorization will be outstanding. (We consider proposals that do not meet these criteria on a case-by-case basis.)
• U.S. management proposals to create a new class of preferred stock or for issuances of preferred stock up to 50% of issued capital, unless we have concerns about use of the authority for anti-takeover purposes.
• Proposals in non-U.S. markets that in our view appropriately limit potential dilution of existing shareholders. A major consideration is whether existing shareholders would have preemptive rights for any issuance under a proposal for standing share issuance authority. We generally consider market-specific guidance in making these decisions; for example, in the U.K. market, we usually follow Association of British Insurers' ("ABI") guidance, although company-specific factors may be considered and for example, may sometimes lead us to voting against share authorization proposals even if they meet ABI guidance.
• Management proposals to authorize share repurchase plans, except in some cases in which we believe there are insufficient protections against use of an authorization for anti-takeover purposes.
• Management proposals to reduce the number of authorized shares of common or preferred stock, or to eliminate classes of preferred stock.
• Management proposals to effect stock splits.
• Management proposals to effect reverse stock splits if management proportionately reduces the authorized share amount set forth in the corporate charter. Reverse stock splits that do not adjust proportionately to the authorized share amount generally will be approved if the resulting increase in authorized shares coincides with the proxy guidelines set forth above for common stock increases.
• Management dividend payout proposals, except where we perceive company payouts to shareholders as inadequate.
2. We generally oppose the following (notwithstanding management support):
• Proposals to add classes of stock that would substantially dilute the voting interests of existing shareholders.
• Proposals to increase the authorized or issued number of shares of existing classes of stock that are unreasonably dilutive, particularly if there are no preemptive rights for existing shareholders. However, depending on market practices, we consider voting for proposals giving general authorization for issuance of shares not subject to pre-emptive rights if the authority is limited.
• Proposals that authorize share issuance at a discount to market rates, except where authority for such issuance is de minimis, or if there is a special situation that we believe justifies such
A-5
authorization (as may be the case, for example, at a company under severe stress and risk of bankruptcy).
• Proposals relating to changes in capitalization by 100% or more.
We consider on a case-by-case basis shareholder proposals to increase dividend payout ratios, in light of market practice and perceived market weaknesses, as well as individual company payout history and current circumstances. For example, currently we perceive low payouts to shareholders as a concern at some Japanese companies, but may deem a low payout ratio as appropriate for a growth company making good use of its cash, notwithstanding the broader market concern.
F. Takeover Defenses and Shareholder Rights.
1.
Shareholder rights plans:
We generally support proposals to require shareholder approval or ratification of shareholder rights plans (poison pills). In voting on rights plans or similar takeover defenses, we consider on a case-by-case basis whether the company has demonstrated a need for the defense in the context of promoting long-term share value; whether provisions of the defense are in line with generally accepted governance principles in the market (and specifically the presence of an adequate qualified offer provision that would exempt offers meeting certain conditions from the pill); and the specific context if the proposal is made in the midst of a takeover bid or contest for control.
2.
Supermajority voting requirements:
We generally oppose requirements for supermajority votes to amend the charter or bylaws, unless the provisions protect minority shareholders where there is a large shareholder. In line with this view, in the absence of a large shareholder we support reasonable shareholder proposals to limit such supermajority voting requirements.
3.
Shareholder right to call a special meeting:
We consider proposals to enhance a shareholder's right to call a special meeting on a case-by-case basis. At large-cap U.S. companies, we generally support efforts to establish the rights of holders of 10% or more of shares to call special meetings, unless the board or state law has a set policy or law establishing such rights at a threshold that we believe to be acceptable.
4.
Written consent rights:
In the U.S. context, we examine proposals for shareholder written consent rights on a case-by-case basis.
5.
Reincorporation:
We consider management and shareholder proposals to reincorporate to a different jurisdiction on a case-by-case basis. We oppose such proposals if we believe the main purpose is to take advantage of laws or judicial precedents that reduce shareholder rights.
6.
Anti-greenmail provisions:
Proposals relating to the adoption of anti-greenmail provisions will be supported, provided that the proposal: (i) defines greenmail; (ii) prohibits buyback offers to large block holders (holders of at least 1% of the outstanding shares and in certain cases, a greater amount) not made to all shareholders or not approved by disinterested shareholders; and (iii) contains no anti-takeover measures or other provisions restricting the rights of shareholders.
7.
Bundled proposals:
We may consider opposing or abstaining on proposals if disparate issues are "bundled" and presented for a single vote.
G. Auditors.
We generally support management proposals for selection or ratification of independent auditors. However, we may consider opposing such proposals with reference to incumbent audit firms if the company has suffered from serious accounting irregularities and we believe rotation of the audit firm is appropriate, or if fees paid to the auditor for non-audit-related services are excessive. Generally, to determine if non-audit fees are excessive, a 50% test will be applied (i.e., non-audit-related fees should be less than 50% of the total fees paid to the auditor). We generally vote against proposals to indemnify auditors.
A-6
H. Executive and Director Remuneration.
1. We generally support the following:
• Proposals for employee equity compensation plans and other employee ownership plans, provided that our research does not indicate that approval of the plan would be against shareholder interest. Such approval may be against shareholder interest if it authorizes excessive dilution and shareholder cost, particularly in the context of high usage ("run rate") of equity compensation in the recent past; or if there are objectionable plan design and provision.
• Proposals relating to fees to outside directors, provided the amounts are not excessive relative to other companies in the country or industry, and provided that the structure is appropriate within the market context. While stock-based compensation to outside directors is positive if moderate and appropriately structured, we are wary of significant stock option awards or other performance-based awards for outside directors, as well as provisions that could result in significant forfeiture of value on a director's decision to resign from a board (such forfeiture can undercut director independence).
• Proposals for employee stock purchase plans that permit discounts, but only for grants that are part of a broad-based employee plan, including all non-executive employees, and only if the discounts are limited to a reasonable market standard or less.
• Proposals for the establishment of employee retirement and severance plans, provided that our research does not indicate that approval of the plan would be against shareholder interest.
2. We generally oppose retirement plans and bonuses for non-executive directors and independent statutory auditors.
3. In the U.S. context, we generally vote against shareholder proposals requiring shareholder approval of all severance agreements, but proposals that require shareholder approval for agreements in excess of three times the annual compensation (salary and bonus) generally will be supported. We generally oppose shareholder proposals that would establish arbitrary caps on pay. We consider on a case-by-case basis shareholder proposals that seek to limit Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans (SERPs), but support such proposals where we consider SERPs to be excessive.
4. Shareholder proposals advocating stronger and/or particular pay-for-performance models will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, with consideration of the merits of the individual proposal within the context of the particular company and its labor markets, and the company's current and past practices. While we generally support emphasis on long-term components of senior executive pay and strong linkage of pay to performance, we consider factors including whether a proposal may be overly prescriptive, and the impact of the proposal, if implemented as written, on recruitment and retention.
5. We generally support proposals advocating reasonable senior executive and director stock ownership guidelines and holding requirements for shares gained in executive equity compensation programs
6. We generally support shareholder proposals for reasonable "claw-back" provisions that provide for company recovery of senior executive bonuses to the extent they were based on achieving financial benchmarks that were not actually met in light of subsequent restatements.
7. Management proposals effectively to re-price stock options are considered on a case-by-case basis. Considerations include the company's reasons and justifications for a re-pricing, the company's competitive position, whether senior executives and outside directors are excluded, potential cost to shareholders, whether the re-pricing or share exchange is on a value-for-value basis, and whether vesting requirements are extended.
8. Say-on-Pay: We consider proposals relating to an advisory vote on remuneration on a case-by-case basis. Considerations include a review of the relationship between executive remuneration and performance based on operating trends and total shareholder return over multiple performance periods. In addition, we review remuneration structures and potential poor pay practices, including relative magnitude of pay, discretionary bonus awards, tax gross ups, change-in-control features, internal pay equity and peer group construction. As long-term investors, we support remuneration policies that align with long-term shareholder returns.
A-7
I. Social, Political and Environmental Issues.
Shareholders in the U.S. and certain other markets submit proposals encouraging changes in company disclosure and practices related to particular corporate, social, political and environmental matters. We consider how to vote on the proposals on a case-by-case basis to determine likely impacts on shareholder value. We seek to balance concerns on reputational and other risks that lie behind a proposal against costs of implementation, while considering appropriate shareholder and management prerogatives. We may abstain from voting on proposals that do not have a readily determinable financial impact on shareholder value. We support proposals that, if implemented, would enhance useful disclosure, but we generally vote against proposals requesting reports that we believe are duplicative, related to matters not material to the business, or that would impose unnecessary or excessive costs. We believe that certain social and environmental shareholder proposals may intrude excessively on management prerogatives, which can lead us to oppose them.
J. Fund of Funds.
Certain Funds advised by an MSIM Affiliate invest only in other MSIM Funds. If an underlying fund has a shareholder meeting, in order to avoid any potential conflict of interest, such proposals will be voted in the same proportion as the votes of the other shareholders of the underlying fund, unless otherwise determined by the Proxy Review Committee.
III. ADMINISTRATION OF POLICY
The MSIM Proxy Review Committee (the "Committee") has overall responsibility for the Policy. The Committee, which is appointed by MSIM's Long-Only Executive Committee, consists of investment professionals who represent the different investment disciplines and geographic locations of the firm, and is chaired by the director of the Corporate Governance Team ("CGT"). Because proxy voting is an investment responsibility and impacts shareholder value, and because of their knowledge of companies and markets, portfolio managers and other members of investment staff play a key role in proxy voting, although the Committee has final authority over proxy votes.
The CGT Director is responsible for identifying issues that require Committee deliberation or ratification. The CGT, working with advice of investment teams and the Committee, is responsible for voting on routine items and on matters that can be addressed in line with these Policy guidelines. The CGT has responsibility for voting case-by-case where guidelines and precedent provide adequate guidance.
The Committee will periodically review and have the authority to amend, as necessary, the Policy and establish and direct voting positions consistent with the Client Proxy Standard.
CGT and members of the Committee may take into account Research Providers' recommendations and research as well as any other relevant information they may request or receive, including portfolio manager and/or analyst comments and research, as applicable. Generally, proxies related to securities held in accounts that are managed pursuant to quantitative, index or index-like strategies ("Index Strategies") will be voted in the same manner as those held in actively managed accounts, unless economic interests of the accounts differ. Because accounts managed using Index Strategies are passively managed accounts, research from portfolio managers and/or analysts related to securities held in these accounts may not be available. If the affected securities are held only in accounts that are managed pursuant to Index Strategies, and the proxy relates to a matter that is not described in this Policy, the CGT will consider all available information from the Research Providers, and to the extent that the holdings are significant, from the portfolio managers and/or analysts.
A. Committee Procedures
The Committee meets at least quarterly and reviews and considers changes to the Policy at least annually. Through meetings and/or written communications, the Committee is responsible for monitoring and ratifying "split votes" (i.e., allowing certain shares of the same issuer that are the subject of the same proxy solicitation and held by one or more MSIM portfolios to be voted differently than other shares) and/or "override voting" (i.e., voting all MSIM portfolio shares in a manner contrary to the Policy). The Committee will review developing issues and approve upcoming votes, as appropriate, for matters as requested by CGT.
The Committee reserves the right to review voting decisions at any time and to make voting decisions as necessary to ensure the independence and integrity of the votes.
A-8
B. Material Conflicts of Interest
In addition to the procedures discussed above, if the CGT Director determines that an issue raises a material conflict of interest, the CGT Director may request a special committee to review, and recommend a course of action with respect to, the conflict(s) in question ("Special Committee").
A potential material conflict of interest could exist in the following situations, among others:
1. The issuer soliciting the vote is a client of MSIM or an affiliate of MSIM and the vote is on a matter that materially affects the issuer.
2. The proxy relates to Morgan Stanley common stock or any other security issued by Morgan Stanley or its affiliates except if echo voting is used, as with MSIM Funds, as described herein.
3. Morgan Stanley has a material pecuniary interest in the matter submitted for a vote (e.g., acting as a financial advisor to a party to a merger or acquisition for which Morgan Stanley will be paid a success fee if completed).
If the CGT Director determines that an issue raises a potential material conflict of interest, depending on the facts and circumstances, the issue will be addressed as follows:
1. If the matter relates to a topic that is discussed in this Policy, the proposal will be voted as per the Policy.
2. If the matter is not discussed in this Policy or the Policy indicates that the issue is to be decided case-by-case, the proposal will be voted in a manner consistent with the Research Providers, provided that all the Research Providers consulted have the same recommendation, no portfolio manager objects to that vote, and the vote is consistent with MSIM's Client Proxy Standard.
3. If the Research Providers' recommendations differ, the CGT Director will refer the matter to a Special Committee to vote on the proposal, as appropriate.
Any Special Committee shall be comprised of the CGT Director and at least two portfolio managers (preferably members of the Committee) as approved by the Committee. The CGT Director may request non-voting participation by MSIM's General Counsel or his/her designee and the Chief Compliance Officer or his/her designee. In addition to the research provided by Research Providers, the Special Committee may request analysis from MSIM Affiliate investment professionals and outside sources to the extent it deems appropriate.
C. Proxy Voting Reporting
The CGT will document in writing all Committee and Special Committee decisions and actions, which documentation will be maintained by the CGT for a period of at least six years. To the extent these decisions relate to a security held by an MSIM Fund, the CGT will report the decisions to each applicable Board of Trustees/Directors of those Funds at each Board's next regularly scheduled Board meeting. The report will contain information concerning decisions made during the most recently ended calendar quarter immediately preceding the Board meeting.
MSIM will promptly provide a copy of this Policy to any client requesting it. MSIM will also, upon client request, promptly provide a report indicating how each proxy was voted with respect to securities held in that client's account.
MSIM's Legal Department is responsible for filing an annual Form N-PX on behalf of each MSIM Fund for which such filing is required, indicating how all proxies were voted with respect to such Fund's holdings.
APPENDIX A
The following procedures apply to accounts managed by Morgan Stanley AIP GP LP and Private Investment Partners Inc. ("AIP").
Generally, AIP will follow the guidelines set forth in Section II of MSIM's Proxy Voting Policy and Procedures. To the extent that such guidelines do not provide specific direction, or AIP determines that consistent with the Client Proxy Standard, the guidelines should not be followed, the Proxy Review Committee has delegated the voting authority to vote securities held by accounts managed by AIP to the Fund of Hedge Funds investment team, the Private Equity Fund of Funds investment team or the Private
A-9
Equity Real Estate Fund of Funds investment team of AIP. A summary of decisions made by the investment teams will be made available to the Proxy Review Committee for its information at the next scheduled meeting of the Proxy Review Committee.
In certain cases, AIP may determine to abstain from determining (or recommending) how a proxy should be voted (and therefore abstain from voting such proxy or recommending how such proxy should be voted), such as where the expected cost of giving due consideration to the proxy does not justify the potential benefits to the affected account(s) that might result from adopting or rejecting (as the case may be) the measure in question.
Waiver of Voting Rights
For regulatory reasons, AIP may either 1) invest in a class of securities of an underlying fund (the "Fund") that does not provide for voting rights; or 2) waive 100% of its voting rights with respect to the following:
1. Any rights with respect to the removal or replacement of a director, general partner, managing member or other person acting in a similar capacity for or on behalf of the Fund (each individually a "Designated Person," and collectively, the "Designated Persons"), which may include, but are not limited to, voting on the election or removal of a Designated Person in the event of such Designated Person's death, disability, insolvency, bankruptcy, incapacity, or other event requiring a vote of interest holders of the Fund to remove or replace a Designated Person; and
2. Any rights in connection with a determination to renew, dissolve, liquidate, or otherwise terminate or continue the Fund, which may include, but are not limited to, voting on the renewal, dissolution, liquidation, termination or continuance of the Fund upon the occurrence of an event described in the Fund's organizational documents; provided, however, that, if the Fund's organizational documents require the consent of the Fund's general partner or manager, as the case may be, for any such termination or continuation of the Fund to be effective, then AIP may exercise its voting rights with respect to such matter.
Approved by Morgan Stanley Funds Board on September 27-28, 2011
A-10