UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-KSB

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007

Commission File Number: 000-49950

INROB TECH LTD.
(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

Nevada
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization)

88-0219239
(IRS Employee Identification No.)
1515 Tropicana Ave, Suite 140
Las Vegas, NV 89119
702-795-3601
(Address of principal executive offices and telephone number)

Securities Registered Under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None

Securities Registered Under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

 
Name of each exchange
Title of Each Class
on which registered
Common Stock, par value $.0001
Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  ¨     No x

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.    Yes  ¨     No x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes x No  ¨     

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer,” “non-accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  ¨            Accelerated filer  ¨            Non-accelerated filer  ¨             Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  ¨     No x

As of April 8, 2008, the aggregate market value of the Registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was: $2,173,958.

The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock, $0.0001 par value, was 96,436,182 as of April 8, 2008.



PART I
 
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and notes thereto included herein. In connection with, and because we desire to take advantage of, the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, we caution readers regarding certain forward-looking statements in the following discussion and elsewhere in this Report and in any other statement made by, or on our behalf, whether or not in future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward-looking statements are statements not based on historical information and which relate to future operations, strategies, financial results, or other developments. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to significant business, economic, and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control and many of which, with respect to future business decisions, are subject to change. These uncertainties and contingencies can affect actual results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by, or on our behalf. We disclaim any obligation to update forward-looking statements.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS

History
 
We were incorporated under the laws of Nevada on March 25, 1986, under the name Beeper Plus, Inc. In April 2001, we consummated a Purchase and Sale transaction for the sale of our paging business known as The Sports Page and Score Page to BeepMe, a third-party vendor and our creditor. As a consequence of the sale of our paging business, we ceased business operations in the paging business. In July 2003, we changed our name to Western Gaming Corporation. Under that name, we were in the business of collecting, organizing, and disseminating timely sports information through wireless services to individual and corporate customers throughout the United States, Canada, and the Caribbean, as well as news information through a network of resellers.
 
On July 21, 2005, we entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with the sole shareholder of Inrob Ltd., Ben-Tsur Joseph, whereby all of the issued and outstanding shares of Inrob Ltd. (10,020 shares of common stock) were acquired by us for a total of 26,442,585 shares of Common Stock, issued after the reverse split of the Common Stock at the rate of 10.98 shares of old Common Stock for each one share of new Common Stock. As part of the reverse merger, 2,057,415 shares of our Common Stock were purchased by Inrob Ltd. on behalf of Mr. Joseph. Thereafter, Mr. Joseph entered into a Share Transfer and Loan Agreement with Inrob Ltd. whereby Inrob Ltd. transferred to Mr. Joseph 2,057,415 shares of our Common Stock in exchange for a promissory note issued by Mr. Joseph in the amount of $475,000. The name of our Company was changed to Inrob Tech Ltd. effective August 17, 2005.
 
The shares issued to Mr. Joseph, together with the shares issued to Inrob Ltd. in the reverse merger, gave Mr. Joseph, at the time of the transaction, control over approximately 95% of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock immediately after the effectiveness of the reverse split. As part of the transaction with Mr. Joseph, Mr. Frank DeRenzo, our former President and former controlling shareholder, received a total of 350,000 shares of post reverse common stock for consultancy services provided in the past.
 
Description of Business
 
Inrob Ltd., our wholly owned Israel-based subsidiary (herein referred to as “Inrob Ltd.”), was established in 1988 as an engineering firm providing a cost-efficient solution for organizations to outsource maintenance of critical and sophisticated equipment. Through Inrob Ltd., we now provide maintenance support of industrial electronic, electro-mechanical, optical, and other scientific equipment, mainly to customers in the defense industry. We also develop, integrate, and produce advanced wireless control solutions for unmanned ground vehicle (“UVR”) robots. Our remote control systems are the "brains" for many UVR solutions. Our objective is to be a world leader in the development and production of advanced wireless control systems and integrated solutions for robots. We aim to provide integrated solutions to meet the needs of a wide range of mission-critical military, law enforcement, and civilian applications.

Inrob's current maintenance activity encompasses the repair and calibration of technologically advanced instruments and systems for companies and organizations such as the Israeli defense forces and Ministry of defense, various defense oriented industries, hospitals and medical centers, universities and academic institutes, laboratories and research centers, energy and infrastructure facilities, communication companies, and transport and aviation organizations.  

1


Inrob's maintenance staff is composed of experienced staff and support technicians. Inrob's personnel is regularly updated with current technological evolutions and participates on a regular basis in further training to keep themselves up to date with developments in Inrob's field of operation. For the supply of its maintenance services, Inrob keeps a large and versatile array of high end, top of the line, electronic testing and repair appliances available for such use.  

The current nature of Israel's security situation coupled with our close work with the Israel Defense Forces ("IDF") and the Israeli police have helped us gain extensive experience in a wide range of military and law enforcement UVR applications and control solutions. We have the ability to provide fast and reliable solutions to meet the immediate operational needs of front-line IDF units as they arise. We recently began targeting the civilian applications market, which includes dangerous tasks such as nuclear plant maintenance, inspection and decommissioning, the demolition industry, firefighting, and rescue services.

Our UVR solutions include:

 
·
Remote control systems (the "brains" of any robot);
 
·
Complete robot systems;
 
·
Customized solutions

We are certified to design, manufacture, and maintain electronic, optical, and electro-mechanical equipment and are a certified supplier to the Israel Defense Forces and the Israeli Air Force. We have also been issued a certificate from the Israeli Air Force stating that our quality system is approved to perform inspection of products and services supplied to the Israeli Air Force.
 
Market for our Products

Robots are increasingly used in tasks involving any of the "three Ds" — dirty, dangerous, or dull. Many commercial industries have successfully made use of robotic technology in well-structured ground environments such as manufacturing and in semi structured environments such as automated agriculture. There is also extensive use of unmanned vehicles in the relatively uncluttered environments of air and sea operations. However, perhaps the most difficult challenge for robots today is the use of unmanned ground vehicles in the unstructured, complex, and changing outdoor environment of land operations.

Our target market is the full range of military, law enforcement, and civilian mission-critical applications for unmanned ground vehicles. We have particular expertise and experience in such applications of UVRs.

Advances in remote-control technologies are leading to increased use of UVRs. For example, UVRs are expected to produce significant changes in ground warfare. Under a plan presented to the United States Congress by Senator John Warner of Virginia in 2000, one-third of U.S. ground combat vehicles would be unmanned by 2015. The Senate Armed Services Committee responded by earmarking $246 million in the 2001 budget for research in unmanned ground and air systems. The U.S. defense budget also includes significant funding for unmanned vehicle projects including research by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), which develops advanced technologies for the US Army's future combat systems. We have, with one relatively insignificant exception, made no sales outside of Israel to date, and cannot assure you that sales to the United States or other countries will be made on commercially acceptable terms, if at all.

Over time, robotic technologies will enable UVRs to be more independent. Maneuvering autonomous and semi-autonomous mobile robots between obstacles in real environments and operating independently, is one of the most challenging research and development topics in mobile robotics today. The control algorithms under development include collecting information from various sensors (laser range finders, ultrasonic sensors, infrared sensors), processing this information, including use of artificial intelligence, and generating real-time instructions for the desired robot motion.
 
Military Applications:

Explosive Ordinance Disposal (“EOD”) . Robots reduce or eliminate the bomb technician's time-on-target. Procedures performed during bomb disposal missions include surveillance and inspection, X-ray imaging, and disruption. These tasks require that sensors or tools be placed in close proximity to the threat. A robot takes risk out of potentially deadly scenarios and lets a bomb technician focus on what to do with the explosive device rather than on the immediate danger to his life.
 

Other Military Applications . There are many other military tasks that are candidates for UVR employment. These include:

 
·
Weapons platforms;          
 
·
Reconnaissance and intelligence gathering;         
 
·
Target acquisition, including a kamikaze role of guiding weapons to target;          
 
·
Nuclear, biological, and chemical (NBC) warfare surveillance and monitoring; 
 
·
Ambushes;         
 
·
Decoy and deception;         
 
·
Combat engineering, including establishing and breaching obstacles;         
 
·
Communications relay;         
 
·
Remote sensors deployment and monitoring;         
 
·
Deploying mines;           
 
·
Forward area re-supply; and         
 
·
Adding greater realism in training exercises.

Law Enforcement Applications:

Improvised Explosive Devices (“IED”) . This was one of the earliest applications of remotely controlled robots, developed by the British Army in the early 1970's for use in Northern Ireland. While there are many similarities between military and law enforcement bomb disposal operations, the threats are sufficiently different to treat the two as separate markets. In addition to EOD, law enforcement bomb disposal more likely involves dealing with relatively unstable explosive devices. The very act of approaching a suspected object can be dangerous as points along the path to the device may be booby-trapped. In addition, no matter how careful a bomb technician is in the inspection or handling of an IED, the possibility always exists that the bomber is waiting nearby to remotely operate the device or a secondary device when the bomb technician is within range. There are approximately 550 bomb squads in the United States. According to an April 2000 report prepared by the Counter Terrorism Technology Support Office (“CTTSO”), less than 30 percent are equipped with bomb disposal robots. While this percentage may have risen since September 11, 2001, we believe there exists a significant market in the United States for bomb disposal robots.

Other Law Enforcement Applications . Other likely law enforcement applications for robots include surveillance, SWAT tasks, and exchanging messages during hostage negotiations.

Civilian Applications

Generally, any industry or job involving the "three D’s" should consider a dedicated robot or remote operated conversion of their standard vehicle. Examples include nuclear plant maintenance, inspection and decommissioning, and the demolition industry, which performs many dangerous tasks while pulling down a building. Another important civilian application is firefighting and rescue services.

Customer Needs Common for all Applications

A major customer need, common for all applications, is for integrated UGV systems with the ability to complete a total mission, versus an individual task. A robot may be able to perform a number of tasks very well, but if it fails or the user believes it will fail in the performance of one task required to complete a particular mission, its utility is greatly diminished. To meet this need, UGV companies will have to provide integrated solutions that can be easily tailored to the users' mission requirements.
 
Products and Services

Products

A variety of companies around the world currently manufacture robots for use in military, law enforcement, and civilian applications. The size of these robots varies from as small as a shoebox to as large as a tele-operated tank. Control and traction methods vary considerably. Some are controlled by radio frequency while others use fiber optic or coax cable. Traction varies from tank-like tracks to multi-wheel combinations.
 
3

 
Principal components of robots include the following:

Platform: This includes the motors, drive train, power source, and structural components. The platform could be a specially designed robot or a standard military or commercial vehicle.

Operator Control Unit: This allows the user to control the robot and its functions in an intuitive fashion. The control unit is compact, lightweight, and easy to operate. It is made of durable waterproof materials, has its own battery source, and can operate under difficult and severe environmental conditions. The control unit allows two-way communication with the robot, i.e. it enables the operator to send instructions to the robot, as well as receive information back from the robot such as real-time video pictures, battery status, traveling speed, and temperature.

Communications: The communication system provides the clear transmission of data (operator instructions, video images etc.) at the robot's operating range. Most robots use wireless radio frequency communication as the primary mode of communication, although some robots use a fiber optic cable.

Tools: These enable the robot to carry out its primary mission. Tools may include a manipulator with adequate reach and freedom, camera, disrupter, x-ray detector, and various sensors and weapon systems.

We design and produce the operator control unit and the communication devices for the UVRs. When a customer requests that we produce a complete UVR, we outsource the UVR’s platform, tools, and sensors to third-party manufacturers. We have manufactured and sold our products, on each occasion on a customized basis.  
 
Services

Inrob Ltd. provides maintenance services for:

 
·
Laboratory equipment including: testing and measurement equipment, temperature chambers, and x-ray equipment.
  
·
Industrial equipment including: balance machinery, presses, cleaning equipment, and production lines.
 
·
Scientific and medical equipment including: spectrometry equipment, laser apparatuses, and analytical tools.
 
·
Closed circuit television systems including: cameras, monitors, and traverse sensors.
 
·
Optical equipment including: cameras and boroscopes.
 
·
Command and control equipment including: transmission and reception systems, control systems and robots.
 
·
Audio equipment including: recording equipment, announcing systems, amplification systems, and sound systems.
 
·
Miscellaneous equipment including: power generators, fail-safe products, projectors, and control rooms.

Most of the equipment used for providing such maintenance services is standard equipment purchased in the local market. Some of the equipment is especially designated equipment that is purchased from the original manufacturers of the equipment to which we supply maintenance services.

Manufacturing

We manufacture control and command units which include the following devices: devices for the coordination of the driving mechanism, devices to control and command the "arms" of the robots, analyzing units for information received from the robot, dispersion of electric current, and development of software for each custom made unit according to the relevant application;

We also manufacture electric and electro-mechanic units, including engine drivers, wiring, electric current supply model, and operating unit - ergonomics, device for communication with robot, software for operation and interface of remote control, and development and manufacture of command and electronic cards.

Most of the equipment used for such production is standard equipment Inrob Ltd. manufactures robots and control and command units that are sold as finished goods ready to use by the customer.
 
4


On December 24, 2007, we entered into an agreement and a manufacturing agreement (the "Manufacturing Agreement," together with the Agreement, the "Agreements") with CP Communication Services, Inc., a Philippines corporation ("CPCOM"), that provides for the lease of the use of CPCOM's premises on a full turnkey basis. The premises include floor space, utilities, equipment, and machinery intended to be used for the manufacture of various components of mobile robots and other products for both civilian and military use to be marketed and sold by us.

Under the terms of the agreements, CPCOM is committing to manufacture, and we have the right to order, products with a total value of up to $28,500,000. In order to secure this right, we are required to pay to CPCOM an amount of $2,950,000, of which $980,000 had been paid by December 31, 2007, and the balance by March 31, 2008.

The agreements provide that CPCOM is required to adapt its existing premises in accordance with our specifications and to be ready to commence the manufacture of products within 48 hours of the receipt of a purchase order from us. The agreements grant us preferred status and priority over any other party for whom CPCOM may provide manufacturing services.

The agreement will remain in effect for an unlimited period of time. The agreement may be terminated by the Company at any time for any reason upon 10 days prior notice without refund of amounts paid.

Regulation

The export of our products is subject to licensing requirements imposed by the Israeli government and requires the approval of SIBAT, a Foreign Defense Assistance and Defense Export Department of the Israeli Ministry of Defense. Except for those regulations that affect businesses generally, we are not affected by any other government regulation .

Competition
 
Our competitors include several large, defense contractors including:

 
·
Cybernetix, France  
  
·
ESI, Canada 
 
·
Foster-Miller, USA  
 
·
Kentree, Ireland 
 
·
OAO Robotics (acquired by Lockheed Martin, Dec. 2001), USA
 
·
Remotec (subsidiary of Northrop Grumman), USA 
 
·
the Israel Aircraft Industries Ltd., the Israel Military Industries Ltd., Elbit Ltd., and Elop Ltd. (all Israeli companies).

These companies have significantly greater financial, technical, and human resources than we do, as well as a wider range of products than we have. In addition, many of our competitors have much greater experience in marketing their products, as well as more established relationships with our target government customers. Our competitors may also have greater name recognition and more extensive customer bases that they can use to their benefit. As a result, we may have difficulty maintaining our market share .
 
We believe that our competitive edge is the quality, product features, and level of integration of our solutions. Because of Israel's security situation and our close work with the Israel Defense Forces and the Israeli police, we have extensive experience in a wide range of military and law enforcement applications. We have the ability to provide fast and reliable solutions to meet the immediate operational needs of front-line IDF units as they arise.
 
According to research in the United States, the most important issues in current UGV usage include the ability to provide integrated solutions and dependable control and communication systems. We have particular expertise and experience in these two critical areas. Overall, we believe that this experience gives our technology and applications a crucial competitive advantage. 
 
5


Intellectual Property
 
We do not have any patents, trademarks, or any other protection over our intellectual property. All of our intellectual property is "know how" and not original proprietary intellectual property. As such, it cannot be protected by patent or trademark. In addition, we do not have confidentiality agreements with any of our employees or suppliers with respect to our intellectual property. The theft or unauthorized use of our intellectual property is not sufficiently provided for, and our intellectual property is extremely susceptible to theft or unauthorized use. Any theft or unauthorized use of our intellectual property could materially adversely affect our operations.
Employees
 
As of December 31, 2007, we had 17 employees, as follows:

   
Number of Employees
 
Management
 
 
3
 
Service
 
 
5
 
Sound/Service Projects
 
 
5
 
Production/Products
 
 
4
 
 
In addition, our relationship with Ben-Tsur Joseph, our President, is governed by the terms of a management agreement.
 
There is currently a collective agreement signed between the labor federation and the industry union in Israel, which applies to the employees of Inrob Ltd. under an expansion order. We believe that our employee relations are good.  

6

 
RISK FACTORS

Risks Related to Our Business
 
We have incurred significant losses to date and expect to continue to incur losses.
 
During the year ended December 31, 2007, we incurred net losses of approximately $2,186,983. We expect to continue to incur losses for at least the next 12 months. Continuing losses will have an adverse impact on our cash flow and may impair our ability to raise additional capital required to continue and expand our operations.
 
Our registered independent auditors have issued a going concern opinion, which may make it more difficult for us to raise capital.
 
Our registered independent auditors have included a going concern opinion on our financial statements because of concerns about our ability to continue as a going concern. These concerns arise from the fact that we have continuing operating losses and negative working capital. If we are unable to continue as a going concern, you could lose your entire investment in us.
 
If we are unable to obtain additional funding, we may have to reduce our business operations.
 
We recently completed two $3,000,000 financings (November 15, 2006, and March 27, 2007)  Nevertheless, if our marketing campaign is not successful in promoting sales of our services, we will be required to seek additional financing. We will also require additional financing to expand into other markets and further develop our products and services. We have no current arrangements with respect to any additional financing. Consequently, there can be no assurance that any additional financing will be available when needed, on commercially reasonable terms or at all. The inability to obtain additional capital may reduce our ability to expand our business operations. Any additional equity financing may involve substantial dilution to our then existing shareholders.
 
If we cannot maintain our current relationship with A.R.T.S. Ltd., our operations would be materially adversely affected.
 
One of our main sub-contractors, A.R.T.S. Ltd., provides critical research, development, and production operations to us. During the past 10 years, A.R.T.S. Ltd. has developed for us most of the software required for our robot related activities. We do not have an agreement with A.R.T.S. Ltd. for the provision of their services to us, and cannot be assured that we will be able to maintain this relationship with that entity. In the event that our relationship with A.R.T.S. Ltd. ceases, the interruption to our research and development activities and production operations would be harmful to our business, and may require a long period of time to establish relationships with new partners with the required level of know-how and expertise. We currently know of several wireless communications software companies, both in Israel and worldwide, capable of providing us with the same services we currently outsource to A.R.T.S. Ltd.
 
As we are a technology-based company, we are required to update our technology and knowledge base on a regular basis. We are a relatively small company, and we have never made the quantitative distinction between our R&D expenses and any other expenses. Thus, we are not able to assess the amount of funds we have paid for R&D over the years, nor are we able to assess the financial effects a break up with A.R.T.S. Ltd. may have on our business.
 
If we do not maintain our acknowledged supplier status with the Israeli Ministry of Defense our business could be materially adversely affected.
 
We currently maintain the status of an acknowledged supplier to the Israeli ministry of defense and have top security clearance. Acknowledged supplier status allows us to provide services to the Israeli Ministry of Defense and the Israeli Defense Forces (i.e. Army, Navy, and Air Force), which comprise a significant portion of our annual revenues (as shown in the table below). If we are unable to maintain the acknowledged supplier status, our business and results of operations may be negatively impacted.
 
We are highly dependent on sales to the Israeli Ministry of Defense and the Israeli Defense Forces.

We are highly dependent on sales of our products and services to the Israeli Ministry of Defense and the Israeli Defense Forces. The following table sets forth the percentage of our total sales that were made to the Israeli Ministry of Defense and the Israeli Defense Forces since 2004.
 
7

 
% of total
 
% of total
 
% of total
 
% of total
 
sales in 2004
 
sales in 2005
 
sales in 2006
 
sales in 2007
 
42.71
%    
39.33
%
 
38.85
%
 
40.28
%

In addition, orders by the Ministry of Defense are subject to cancellation without prior notice. Unless we are able to diversify our customer base, in the event that there is any interruption of sales orders from the Israeli Ministry of Defense and the Israeli Defense Forces or a large number of unanticipated cancellations of its orders to us, we may suffer a sharp decline in our results of operations. If this were to occur, this will have a negative impact on the value of the Company and your investment.

Any significant delay in collecting outstanding receivables from Israel's Ministry of Defense could adversely affect our ability to conduct our business.
 
Israel's Ministry of Defense is one of our significant customers and comprises a significant portion of our accounts receivable. The M.O.D.'s conventional payment terms are 60 days. In the past, we have experienced significant delays in payment from the M.O.D. (up to current payment + 150 days). These delays are mostly due to strikes by the M.O.D.'s public workers. Any future delays could adversely affect our cash flow and ability to operate our business, especially in light of the fact that this entity represents a large portion of our revenues.
 
The volatility of the Ministry of Defense’s budget could adversely affect the amount of business it may conduct with us.
 
In the past, the Ministry of Defense’s budget has been volatile and any significant cuts in its budget could adversely affect the amount of business it conducts with us. As our largest customer, any significant reduction in the amount of purchases the Ministry of Defense makes from us or from third parties which have subcontracted work to us, could materially adversely affect our results of operations.
 
Our intellectual property is unprotected and is susceptible to piracy.
 
We do not have any patents, trademarks, or any other protection over our intellectual property. All of our intellectual property is "know how" and not original proprietary intellectual property. As such, it cannot be protected by patent or trademark. In addition, we do not have confidentiality agreements with any of our employees or suppliers with respect to our intellectual property. The theft or unauthorized use of our intellectual property is not sufficiently provided for, and our intellectual property is extremely susceptible to theft or unauthorized use. Any theft or unauthorized use of our intellectual property could materially adversely affect our operations.
 
Our President has absolute control of our affairs.
 
In November 2006, we granted to Ben-Tsur Joseph, our President, Chief Financial Officer, and sole Director, 1,000 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, each of which carries voting rights equal to 400,000 shares of our common stock. As a result, for voting purposes, Mr. Joseph owns a total of 428,500,004 shares. This gives him absolute control over our affairs including the right to elect and remove Directors, appoint officers, amend our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, and approve a merger, consolidation, or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. In addition, this concentration of voting control could inhibit the management of our business and affairs and have the effect of delaying, deferring, or preventing a change in control or impeding a merger, consolidation, takeover, or other business combination which other shareholders may view favorably. Therefore, you will not be able to exert any control over our business. This greatly reduces the value of your investment and your sole remedy for disagreeing with the direction of our business will be to sell your shares.
 
If our employees' entitlements do not comply with Israeli law, we may have to pay additional compensation to our employees.
 
Terms of employment for our employees are individually negotiated with each and every employee. The relationship between the parties, their rights, and mutual duties are determined solely on the basis of the verbal agreements reached after these negotiations. 


We believe that we have a good overall relationship with our employees, and it is common practice for us to amicably settle all debts between the parties upon the termination of the employees' term with us. We have never made an active effort to ascertain whether or not workers may be entitled to such payments, benefits, or advantages, nor have we ever made an active effort to ascertain what such payments, benefits, or advantages might be.  
 
We have no knowledge as to whether we adhere to the aforementioned legal requirements. Should an authorized court determine that we do not adhere to the said requirements, we may be responsible to pay significant damages that could adversely affect the results of our operations.

Loss of Ben-Tsur Joseph , our President, could impair our ability to operate.
 
If we lose our President, Ben-Tsur Joseph, or are unable to attract or retain qualified personnel, our business could suffer. Our success is highly dependent on our ability to attract and retain qualified scientific and management personnel. We are highly dependent on our management, in particular, Ben-Tsur Joseph, who is critical to the development of our business. Mr. Joseph’s services are made available to us under the terms of a management agreement, which may be terminated on three-month prior notice. The loss of his services could have a material adverse effect on our operations. If we were to lose this individual, we may experience difficulties in competing effectively, developing our technology, and implementing our business strategies. We do not have key man life insurance in place for any person working for us.
 
We face intense competition that could adversely impact our market share and our revenue.
 
Our competitors include several large, integrated defense contractors (e.g. Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, Elbit, El-Op, Israel Aircraft Industries, Israel Military Industries). These companies have significantly greater financial, technical, and human resources than we do, as well as a wider range of products than we have. In addition, many of our competitors have much greater experience in marketing their products, as well as more established relationships with our target government customers. Our competitors may also have greater name recognition and more extensive customer bases that they can use to their benefit. As a result, we may have difficulty maintaining or increasing our market share.
 
The intense competition in our industry has also led to rapid technological developments, evolving industry standards, and frequent releases of new products and enhancements. It has also led to steep declines in the price of products as manufacturers find low cost locales for the manufacture of their products. If we are unable to continue enhancing our current capabilities, to adapt to other technological changes in the industry, or offer our products at competitive prices, our business, financial condition, liquidity, and results of operations could be significantly harmed.
 
We are authorized to issue "blank check" preferred stock which, if issued without stockholders approval, may adversely affect the rights of holders of our common stock.
 
Our Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to 20,000,000 shares of "blank check" preferred stock with such designations, rights, and preferences as may be determined from time to time by our Board of Directors, of which to date we have designated and issued 1,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock. Accordingly, our Board of Directors is empowered, without stockholder approval, to issue preferred stock with dividend, liquidation, conversion, voting, or other rights which would adversely affect the voting power or other rights of our stockholders. In the event of issuance, the preferred stock could be utilized, under certain circumstances, as a method of discouraging, delaying, or preventing a change in control, which could have the effect of discouraging bids for Inrob and thereby prevent stockholders from receiving the maximum value for their shares. We have no present intention to issue any shares of its preferred stock in order to discourage or delay a change of control. However, there can be no assurance that preferred stock will not be issued at some time in the future.   


ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
 
We own no real property. Our Registered Agent, Mr. Frank DeRenzo, allows us the use of his office as a United States address for a nominal fee of $500 per year. The space is sufficient for our needs.
 
For the year ended December 31, 2005, we were a party to a lease agreement for our premises in Israel, which expired in January, 2006. In 2006, we entered into a new one-year lease agreement, with an option to extend the agreement for an additional year for the use of 1,135 square meters of office and engineering/operations space. We may terminate the lease agreement upon 60-days notice. Future minimum annual payments (exclusive of taxes, insurance, and maintenance costs) under the lease are approximately $91,935 for the calendar year 2006. This agreement was terminated, and in June 2006, Inrob Ltd. entered into a new lease agreement for the use of 300 square meters. The lease is for a period of 36 months. The monthly payments under the lease are $3.50 per square meter. The Company is also a party to a lease agreement for a warehouse in Israel entered into in 1999 for the use of 175.3 square meters. The monthly payments under the lease are approximately $900.  

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation against us that we expect will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity, or operating results. However, legal claims are inherently uncertain and we cannot assure you that we will not be adversely affected in the future by legal proceedings.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
 
None.

10

PART II  
Item 5. Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

Our common stock has been included for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “IRBL.OB” since July 21, 2005.
 
The following table shows the reported high and low closing bid quotations per share for our common stock based on information provided by the OTC Bulletin Board. Particularly since our common stock is traded infrequently, such over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without markup, markdown, or commissions and may not necessarily represent actual transactions or a liquid trading market.

Year Ended December 31, 2005
 
HIGH
 
LOW
 
First Quarter
   
5.60
   
0.32
 
Second Quarter
   
1.75
   
0.54
 
Third Quarter
   
4.39
   
0.13
 
Fourth Quarter
   
0.42
   
0.15
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2006
 
HIGH
 
LOW
 
First Quarter
   
0.68
   
0.38
 
Second Quarter
   
0.68
   
0.41
 
Third Quarter
   
0.44
   
0.21
 
Fourth Quarter
   
0.38
   
0.26
 

Year Ended December 31, 2007
 
HIGH
 
LOW
 
First Quarter
   
0.315
   
0.24
 
Second Quarter
   
0.26
   
0.19
 
Third Quarter
   
0.27
   
0.18
 
Fourth Quarter
   
0.19
   
0.109
 

ITEM. 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and notes thereto included herein. In connection with, and because we desire to take advantage of, the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, we caution readers regarding certain forward-looking statements in the following discussion and elsewhere in this Report and in any other statement made by, or on our behalf, whether or not in future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward-looking statements are statements not based on historical information and which relate to future operations, strategies, financial results, or other developments. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to significant business, economic, and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control and many of which, with respect to future business decisions, are subject to change. These uncertainties and contingencies can affect actual results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by, or on our behalf. We disclaim any obligation to update forward-looking statements.
 
PLAN OF OPERATIONS
 
Our operating subsidiary is Inrob Israel. Inrob Israel was established in 1988 as an engineering firm providing cost-efficient solutions for organizations to outsource maintenance of critical and sophisticated equipment. We now provide maintenance support of industrial electronic, electro-mechanical, optical, and other scientific equipment, mainly to customers in the defense industry.
 
Inrob Israel and its management team built on this engineering experience and customer base, and in 1992 expanded into a second area of operations. Today, on top of our maintenance and support services, we develop, integrate, and produce advanced wireless control solutions for unmanned ground vehicle robots. Our remote control systems are the "brains" for many UGV solutions.
 
The current nature of Israel's security situation coupled with our close work with the Israel Defense Forces and the Israeli police, has helped us gain extensive experience in a wide range of military and law enforcement UGV applications and control solutions. We have the ability to provide fast and reliable solutions to meet the immediate operational needs of front-line IDF units as they arise. We are also targeting the civilian applications market, which includes dangerous tasks such as nuclear plant maintenance, inspection and decommissioning, the demolition industry and firefighting, and rescue services.
 
Our UGV solutions include:
 
● Remote control systems (the "brains" of any robot)
● Complete robot systems
● Customized solutions
 
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
Year Ended December 31, 2007, Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2006
 
Revenues-
 
Revenues increased to $1,993,822 in 2007, or 20.3 percent, over revenues of $1,656,798 for 2006. The increase was comprised of an increase in service revenues due to an increase in business volume to new and existing clients amounting to $438,235, offset by a decrease in product sales of $101,211. 

12

 
Cost of Goods Sold-
 
Cost of good sold increased from $1,350,954 in 2006 by $230,189 or 17.0 percent, to $1,580,783 in 2007. The increase was primarily attributed to increases in salaries and wages, employee goodwill, and vehicle operating expenses, offset by reductions in occupancy/rent costs, insurance, repairs and maintenance, and project consulting expenses.  

General and Administrative Expenses-
 
General and administrative expenses increased by $773,096, or 72.6 percent, to $1,838,438 in 2007 when compared to $1,065,342 in 2006. The increase was primarily attributed to increases in office and supply expenses, management fees, promotion and business expansion expenses, depreciation expense, and bank fees, offset by decreases in telephone and communications expenses, and professional fees.
 
Other (Expense)-
 
Other expense increased by $695,430, or 1,051.12 percent, to $761,584 during 2007. This increase was due to an overall increase in interest expense from certain convertible notes plus the amortization of debt issuance expenses, offset by the elimination of certain bank debt for the period, and an increase in interest income to $198,855 in 2007.
 
Comprehensive (Loss)-
 
Comprehensive income for 2007 amounted to $14,114, a decrease of $22,528, or 61.5 percent, when compared to comprehensive income of $36,642 for 2006, and was due primarily to fluctuations in Israeli currency.
 
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding-
 
The weighted average number of common shares outstanding increased from 61,350,201 in 2006 to 66,704,947 in 2007. The increase was primarily due to various transactions that were completed involving our common stock.

Year Ended December 31, 2006, Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2005
 
Revenues-
 
Revenues increased to $1,656,798 in 2006, or 4.8 percent, over revenues of $1,580,615 for 2005. The increase was comprised of an increase in service revenues due to an increase in business volume to new and existing clients amounting to $107,079, offset by a decrease in product sales of $30,896. 

Cost of Goods Sold-
 
Cost of good sold increased from $934,930 in 2005 by $415,664, or 44.5 percent, to $1,350,594 in 2006. The increase was primarily attributed to increases in salaries and wages, repairs and maintenance, employee goodwill, vehicle operating expenses, and a provision for loss on a contract, offset by reductions in occupancy/rent costs, insurance, and project consulting expenses.  

General and Administrative Expenses-
 
General and administrative expenses increased by $562,774, or 112 percent, to $1,065,342 in 2006 when compared to $502,568 in 2005. The increase was primarily attributed to increases in office and supply expenses, management fees, telephone and communications expenses, professional fees, promotion and business expansion expenses, depreciation expense, and realized foreign currency exchange losses, offset by decreases in auto transportation expenses, and computer supplies and repair expenses.
 
Other (Expense)-
 
Other expense increased by $32,479, or 96.4 percent, to $66,154 during 2006. This increase was due to an overall increase in interest expense from a Company financing plus the amortization of debt issuance expenses, offset by the elimination of certain bank debt for the period, and an increase in interest income to $48,269 in 2006.

13

 
Comprehensive Income (Loss)-
 
Comprehensive income for 2006 amounted to $36,642, an increase of $16,452, or 81.5 percent, when compared to comprehensive income of $20,190 for 2005, and was due primarily to favorable fluctuations in Israeli currency.
 
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding-
 
The weighted average number of common shares outstanding increased from 38,753,607 in 2005 to 61,350,201 in 2006. The increase was primarily due to various transactions that were completed involving our common stock.
  Liquidity and Financial Resources

During the year ended December 31, 2007, net cash (used in) operating activities amounted to $(2,302,714) when compared to net cash (used in) operating activities of $(176,647) for the same period in 2006. The increase in net cash (used in) operations was due primarily to increases in net (loss), accounts receivable, a deposit on a manufacturing contract, and a decrease in deferred revenue, offset by decreases in inventory, cost of uncompleted contracts in excess of billings, and increases in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, depreciation, and the amortization of debt issuance costs. Net cash used in investing activities in 2007 for the purchase of property and equipment amounted to $(305,804). In 2007, financing activities provided $2,803,008 in net cash primarily due to the issuance of convertible notes in the amount of $3,000,000, and bank loans. As of December 31, 2007, current liabilities exceeded current assets by $1,935,096, and the accumulated deficit amounted to $(3,501,745). Considering our obligation under a manufacturing contract, we will need to complete the manufacturing and sale of products and services under the turn-key arrangement, and additional capital formation transaction in 2008 in order to sustain our operations for at least the next 12 months.

Recent Financing Activities

November 2006 Financing

On November 15, 2006, we issued to a group of accredited investors our 8% two-year convertible notes in the principal amount of $3,000,000. Amortizing payments of the outstanding principal amount and interest under the notes will commence on the third month anniversary date of the date of issuance of the Notes and on the same day of each month thereafter until the principal amount and interest have been repaid in full. On each payment date, we are required to make payments to the note holders in the amount of 4.76% of the initial principal amount and all interest accrued on the notes as of the payment date. At our election, monthly payments may be made (i) in cash in an amount equal to 115% of the principal amount component of the monthly payment and 100% of all other components, or (ii) in shares of our registered common stock at a conversion price equal to the lesser of (A) $0.25, or (B) 75% of the average of the closing bid price of our common stock for our common stock’s principal market for the five trading days preceding the date a notice of conversion is given to us after we notify the holder of the notes of its election to make a monthly payment in shares of our common stock. We may prepay the outstanding principal amount of the Notes at a 20% premium, together with accrued but unpaid interest thereon and any and all other sums due. The note holders have a right to convert the notes into shares of common stock at $0.25 per share. No conversions may take place if it would cause a holder to become the beneficial owner of more than 4.99% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, which limitation is subject to waiver by the holder upon 61 days prior written notice to us.

In connection with the notes, we also issued Class A Warrants to purchase 6,000,000 shares of our common stock at $0.40 per share and Class B Warrants to purchase 6,000,000 shares of our common stock at $0.50 per share. All warrants are exercisable for a period of five years following the effective date of the Registration Statement of which this Prospectus forms a part.
 
We believe that the proceeds from the sale of the notes will be sufficient to sustain us through the next 12 months. Nevertheless, the aforementioned factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We anticipate that in order to fulfill our plan of operation including repayment of certain bank debt, a convertible debenture, and other liabilities, we will need to seek debt and/or equity financing from outside sources. We are currently pursuing debt and equity capital formation activities in order to increase our working capital and overall solvency positions.

 
March 2007 Financing

On March 27, 2007, we entered into and consummated a subscription agreement with a group of accredited investors providing for the issuance to the investors of our 8% convertible notes in the principal amount of $3,000,000. The notes mature two years from the date of issuance (the "2007 Financing").

Under the terms of the transactional documents, all rights and benefits to be granted to the investors (including the security interest) are identical to and are intended to be shared equally with holders of convertible notes and warrants issued by the Company as of November 15, 2006. In addition, all repayment and conversion terms of and registration rights relating to these notes are identical to those contained the notes issued in November 2006.

Most of the proceeds from this financing will be used for research and development, including but not limited to, research and development to upgrade existing products, new product development, engagement in joint ventures with strategic partners to develop new opportunities, and markets for both new and existing products.

On October 23, 2007, we entered into an amendment to the 2007 Financing documents. Under the terms of the amendment, we are no longer required to register the shares issuable upon conversion of the Notes and exercise of the warrants issued in connection with the Agreement. The interest under the Notes was increased to 18% and is deemed to have accrued from the date of issuance of the Notes. We will be required to make principal and interest payments under the Notes in common stock only. The exercise price of the warrants was reduced to $0.25 and their expiration date was fixed at the sixth anniversary of the closing date of the 2007 Financing.
 
Significant Customers
 
For the years ended December 31, 2007, and 2006, we had certain customers that accounted for more than 10% of total revenues, as follows:

 
 
2007
 
2006
 
Ministry of Defense
 
$
803,089
 
$
643,612
 
 
15


Item 7. Financial Statements
 
The Financial Statements are annexed at the end of the filing.  
Item 8. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
 
(a) On November 1, 2005, the Company notified its registered independent auditor, Spector & Wong, LLP, 780 South Lake Avenue, Suite 723, Pasadena, CA 91101, (888) 584-5577, that it was being replaced as the registered independent auditor of the Company, by Davis Accounting Group P.C.
 
On November 1, 2005, we engaged Davis Accounting Group P.C., located at 1957 W. Royal Hunte Drive #150, Cedar City, Utah 84720, (435) 865-2808, as our registered independent auditors to audit our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
 
During the period of their engagement through November 1, 2005, there were no disagreements between Spector & Wong, LLP, and the Company on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Spector & Wong, LLP, would have caused them to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its reports on the Company's financial statements, other than the fee dispute that has arisen between the parties.
 
(b) Effective November 1, 2006, Davis Accounting Group P.C., was retained as our registered independent auditor. Prior to the engagement, we did not consult with Davis Accounting Group P.C. regarding the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, or the type of audit opinion that may be rendered with respect to our financial statements, as well did not consult with Davis Accounting Group P.C., as to the application of accounting principles to a specific completed or contemplated transaction, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the small business issuer's financial statements and either written or oral advice was provided that was an important factor considered by the small business issuer in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue.
Item 8A. Controls and Procedures
 
Evaluation and Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
We have adopted and maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods required under the SEC’s rules and forms and that the information is gathered and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer), as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As required by SEC Rule 15d-15(b), our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14 as of the end of the period covered by this Report. Based on the foregoing evaluation, they have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in our periodic SEC filings and to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic SEC filings is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure about our internal control over financial reporting discussed below.

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered independent auditor regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered independent auditor pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
Changes in Internal Controls
 
There were no changes to the internal controls during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2006, that have materially affected or that are reasonably likely to affect the internal controls.

16


Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls
 
A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving its objectives. Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective at that reasonable assurance level.
Item 8B. Other Information
 
Not applicable.

17

 
PART III  
Item 9.   Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters, Control Persons, and Corporate Governance; Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.

Our sole Director and executive officer is:

Name
 
Age
 
Position
Ben-Tsur Joseph
 
47
 
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
 
Ben-Tsur Joseph, Co-founder, President, and sole Director, co-founded our subsidiary, Inrob Ltd. ("Inrob Israel") in Israel in 1988, and was joint CEO until 1999. He has extensive experience and knowledge of unmanned air and ground vehicle operations and continues to work closely with major defense clients. Mr. Joseph is currently the President and sole Director of Inrob Israel. He is also the founder, CEO, and Director of Ben-Tsur Joseph Holdings, Ltd.  He also acted as Chief Executive Officer of Elina Industries from 1989 to 2004. During 2000 and 2001, Mr. Joseph was chairman of Elad Hotels, an Israeli publicly traded company. He was also Chief Executive Officer of D.J.G. Industries- Electrical and Lighting Products Ltd., an Israeli publicly traded company. Mr. Joseph’s services to us are made available through a management agreement which may be terminated by either party upon 90 days prior notice.   
Item 10. Executive Compensation
 
The following table sets forth the total compensation we paid for our fiscal years ended December 31, 2007, and 2006, to our executive officers. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006, and 2005, no Executive Officer or Director of the Company received remuneration. There are no arrangements for the compensation of Directors.
 
Summary Compensation Table
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
All Other
 
 
 
Name and principal position
 
Year
 
Salary ($)
 
Bonus ($)
 
Stock Awards ($)
 
Compensation ($)
 
Total ($)
 
(a)
 
(b)
 
(c)
 
(d)
 
(e)
 
(i)
 
(j)*
 
                           
Ben-Tsur Joseph
   
2007
   
-0-
   
-0-
   
-0-
   
-0-
   
-0-
 
President and Chief Executive Officer
   
2006
   
-0-
   
-0-
   
150,000
***   
-0-
   
-0-
 
 
*   Mr. Joseph’s services to us are made available through a management agreement which may be terminated by either party upon 90 days prior notice. During the years ended December 31, 2006, and 2007, under the management agreement, we accrued $220,000 and $240,000 in management fees, respectively. During 2006 and 2007, no management fees were paid to Mr. Joseph. Mr. Joseph provided for the offset of $205,000 owed to the Company by a related party entity of Mr. Joseph against the management fee liability which reduced the total amount owed as of December 31, 2006, to approximately $135,000.
 
**   Consists of 1,000 shares of Preferred Stock

Option Grants in Fiscal Year 2007
 
We did not issue any option grants during fiscal year 2007.
 
Our Employee Stock Option Plan was previously extended to 2010. Currently no options have been issued under the Employee Stock Option Plan.

18


Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
 
Under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, our Directors and certain of our officers, and persons holding more than 10 percent of our common stock are required to file forms reporting their beneficial ownership of our common stock and subsequent changes in that ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such persons are also required to furnish us with copies of all forms so filed.
 
Based solely upon a review of copies of such forms filed on Forms 3, 4, and 5, and amendments thereto furnished to us, we believe that during the year ended December 31, 2007, our executive officers, Directors, and greater than 10 percent beneficial owners complied on a timely basis with all Section 16(a) filing requirements.
 
19

 
Item 11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
 
The following table describes, as of March 31, 2007, the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock by persons known to us to own more than 75% of such stock and the ownership of Common Stock by our Director, and by all officers and Directors as a group.

Name of Shareholder
 
Number of Shares
 
Percent
 
Ben-Tsur Joseph
2 Haprat St.
Yavne
Israel
   
428,500,004
(1)
 
91.6
%

All Directors and officers as a group (one person)

(1) Includes 1,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, each of which carries voting rights equal to 400,000 shares of common stock.
Item 12. Transactions with Related Person, Promoters, and Certain Control Persons.
 
As of December 31, 2007, Mr. Ben-Tsur Joseph, President and Director of the Company, had loaned a total of $2,849 to the Company for working capital purposes. The loan is unsecured, non-interest bearing, and has no terms for repayment.

In July 2005, Inrob Israel purchased, on behalf of Ben-Tsur Joseph, its President, Director, and sole stockholder, 2,057,415 shares of common stock of the Company in connection with the reverse merger. The amount of consideration provided by Inrob Israel for the shares was $475,000. Thereafter, Mr. Joseph entered into a Share Transfer and Loan Agreement with Inrob Israel whereby the Company transferred to Mr. Joseph 2,057,415 shares of the common stock of the Company in exchange for a promissory note issued by Mr. Joseph in the amount of $475,000. The promissory note carries an interest rate of four percent per annum, and is payable to Inrob Israel on demand.
 
Inrob Israel entered into a management agreement with an officer and Director on October 1, 2003, which was subsequently extended as to its commencement date to May 1, 2005. Other terms and conditions related to equipment usage commenced with the original date of the agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company is obligated to pay $15,000 per month during the first year and $20,000 per month thereafter for management fees. For the years ended December 31, 2006, and 2007, the Company accrued $220,000 and $240,000, respectively, under the management agreement. Mr. Joseph provided for the offset of $205,000 owed to the Company by a related party entity of Mr. Joseph against the management fee liability which reduced the total amount owed as of December 31, 2006, to approximately $135,000. The management agreement does not have a specific completion date, but may be terminated by either party on written notice of three months.  

20

Item 13. Exhibits

Exhibit
 
Description
3.1
 
Certificate of Incorporation (1)
3.1a
 
Certificate of Designation for Series A Preferred Stock(2)
3.2
 
Bylaws (1)
4.1
 
Form of Secured Convertible Note, dated November 15, 2006 (3)
4.2
 
Form of Warrant, dated November 15, 2006 (3)
4.3
 
Form of Secured Convertible Note, dated March 27, 2007 (4)
4.4
 
Form of Warrant, dated March 27, 2007 (4)
10.1
 
Subscription Agreement, dated November 15, 2006 (3)
10.2
 
Funds Escrow Agreement, dated November 15, 2006 (3)
10.3
 
Security Agreement, dated November 15, 2006 (3)
10.4
 
Stock Pledge Agreement, dated November 15, 2006 (3)
10.5
 
Guaranty Agreement, dated November 15, 2006 (3)
10.6
 
Collateral Agent Agreement, dated November 15, 2006 (3)
10.7
 
Agreement, dated October 1, 2003, between Inrob, Ltd and Ben-Tsur Joseph (1)
10.8
 
Subscription Agreement, dated March 27, 2007 (4)
10.9
 
Funds Escrow Agreement, dated March 27, 2007 (4)
10.10
 
Stock Pledge Agreement, dated March 27, 2007 (4)
10.11
 
Guaranty Agreement, dated March 27, 2007 (4)
10.12
 
Collateral Agent Agreement, dated March 27, 2007 (4)
10.13
 
Security Agreement, dated March 26, 2007 (4)
10.14
 
Amendment to Subscription Agreement, dated October 23, 2007 (5)
10.15
 
Agreement, dated December 24, 2007, by and between Inrob Philippines Ltd, and CP Communication Services, Inc. (6)
10.16
 
Manufacturing Agreement, dated December 24, 2007, by and between Inrob Philippines Ltd, and CP Communication Services, Inc. (6)
31.1
 
Certification of Principal Executive and Financial Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(A)/15d-14(A) as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1
 
Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002
* Filed herewith
 
(1)
Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (SEC File No. 333-129074)   filed on December 20, 2006.
 
(2)
Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Definitive Information Statement filed on September 18, 2006.
 
(3)
Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 21, 2006.
 
(4)
Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 30, 2007.
 
(5)
Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 29, 2007.
 
(6)
Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 28, 2007.
 
21


ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL REGISTERED INDEPENDENT AUDITOR FEES AND SERVICES

1) Audit Fees
 
The aggregate fees billed by Davis Accounting Group P.C. for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company's annual financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, and the audit of Inrob Israel for the year ended December 31, 2006, was $28,250.
 
2) Audit-Related Fees
 
The Company did not engage its principal registered independent auditors to provide assurance and related services during the last two fiscal periods.
 
3) Tax Fees
 
The Company did not engage its principal registered independent auditors to provide tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning services during the last two fiscal years.
 
4) All Other Fees
 
The Company did not engage its principal registered independent auditors to render services to the Company during the last two fiscal years, other than reported above.  

Signatures
 
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act the Company caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


Date: April 14, 2007
Inrob Tech Ltd.
 
 
 
/s/
 Ben-Tsur Joseph
 
Ben-Tsur Joseph, President and Chief
 
Executive and Accounting Officer
 
 
Date: April 14, 2007
Inrob Tech Ltd.
 
 
 
/s/
 Ben-Tsur Joseph
 
Ben-Tsur Joseph, Sole Director
 
23

 
INROB TECH LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007, AND 2006

Report of Registered Independent Auditors
F-2
   
Consolidated Financial Statements-
 
   
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2007
F-3
   
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 
for the Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
F-4
   
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ (Deficit) for the Years
 
Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
F-5
   
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
 
December 31, 2007, and 2006
F-6
   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years
 
Ended December 31, 2007, and 2006
F-8
 
F-1


REPORT OF REGISTERED INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Inrob Tech Ltd.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Inrob Tech Ltd. (a Nevada corporation) and subsidiary as of December 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive (loss), stockholders’ (deficit), and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Inrob Tech Ltd. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2007, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has experienced operating losses, and has negative working capital. These and other factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding these matters are also described in Note 2 to the financial statements. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Davis Accounting Group P.C.

Cedar City, Utah,
April 12, 2008.
 
F-2


INROB TECH LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2007

   
2007
 
ASSETS
       
Current Assets:
       
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
2,486,975
 
Accounts Receivable-
       
Trade
   
303,133
 
Income and other taxes
   
57,517
 
Less - Allowance for doubtful accounts
   
-
 
Inventories
   
507,744
 
Cost of uncompleted contracts in excess of billings
   
56,407
 
Prepaid expenses
   
19,574
 
         
Total current assets
   
3,431,350
 
         
Property and Equipment:
       
Office and computer equipment
   
99,885
 
Furniture and fixtures
   
65,335
 
Vehicles
   
587,522
 
Leasehold improvements
   
43,760
 
         
     
796,502
 
Less - Accumulated depreciation and amortization
   
(352,700
)
         
Net property and equipment
   
443,802
 
         
Other Assets:
       
Deposits and other
   
586
 
Debt issuance costs, net
   
368,572
 
Loans to related party companies
   
274,061
 
Interest receivable on loan to Ben-Tsur Joseph
   
46,537
 
Manufacturing contract deposit
   
982,000
 
         
Total other assets
   
1,671,756
 
         
Total Assets
 
$
5,546,908
 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT)
       
         
Current Liabilities:
       
Bank overdrafts
 
$
191,870
 
Bank loans and other debt, current portion
   
46,931
 
Current portion of convertible notes
   
3,715,389
 
Accounts payable - Trade
   
228,272
 
Due to related party - Director and stockholder
   
2,849
 
Due to related party - Affiliate company
   
2,880
 
Billings on uncompleted contracts in excess of costs
   
195,341
 
Due to related party - Investor group
   
178,438
 
Accrued liabilities
   
252,260
 
Income tax payable
   
19,643
 
Deferred revenue
   
532,573
 
         
Total current liabilities
   
5,366,446
 
         
Long-term Debt, less current portion:
       
Bank loans and other debt
   
183,792
 
Convertible notes
   
750,000
 
Total long-term debt
   
933,792
 
         
Total liabilities
   
6,300,238
 
         
Commitments and Contingencies
       
         
Stockholders' (Deficit):
       
Preferred stock, par value $.0001 per share; 20,000,000 shares
       
authorized; 1,000 Series A shares issued and outstanding
   
-
 
Additional paid-in capital
   
150,000
 
Common stock, par value $.0001 per share; 380,000,000 shares
       
authorized; 79,134,307 shares issued and outstanding
   
7,913
 
Additional paid-in capital
   
3,010,977
 
Less - Loan receivable - Director and stockholder
   
(475,000
)
Accumulated other comprehensive income
   
54,525
 
Accumulated (deficit)
   
(3,501,745
)
         
Total stockholders' (deficit)
   
(753,330
)
         
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' (Deficit)
 
$
5,546,908
 

The accompanying notes to financial statements
are an integral part of this balance sheet.
 
F-3


INROB TECH LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007, AND 2006
 
   
2007
 
2006
 
Revenues:
             
Services
 
$
1,700,246
 
$
1,262,011
 
Product sales
   
293,576
   
394,787
 
               
Total revenues
   
1,993,822
   
1,656,798
 
               
Cost of Goods Sold:
             
Services
   
1,482,924
   
1,185,000
 
Product sales
   
97,859
   
165,594
 
               
Total cost of goods sold
   
1,580,783
   
1,350,594
 
               
Gross Profit
   
413,039
   
306,204
 
               
Expenses:
             
General and administrative
   
1,838,438
   
1,065,342
 
               
Total general and administrative expenses
   
1,838,438
   
1,065,342
 
               
Income (Loss) from Operations
   
(1,425,399
)
 
(759,138
)
               
Other Income (Expense):
             
Interest and other income
   
198,855
   
48,269
 
Interest (expense)
   
(960,439
)
 
(114,423
)
               
Total other income (expense)
   
(761,584
)
 
(66,154
)
               
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes
   
(2,186,983
)
 
(825,292
)
               
(Provision) for income taxes
   
-
   
(2,940
)
               
Net Income (Loss)
   
(2,186,983
)
 
(828,232
)
               
Comprehensive Income:
             
Israeli currency translation
   
14,114
   
36,642
 
               
Total Comprehensive (Loss)
 
$
(2,172,869
)
$
(791,590
)
               
(Loss) Per Common Share:
             
(Loss) per common share - Basic and Diluted
 
$
(0.03
)
$
(0.01
)
               
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares
             
Outstanding During the Periods- Basic and Diluted
   
66,704,947
   
61,350,201
 

The accompanying notes to financial statements are
an integral part of these statements.
 
F-4


INROB TECH LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT) (NOTE 2)
FOR THE PERIODS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007, AND 2006

                   
Less - Loan
 
Accumulated
         
       
Additional
     
Additional
 
Receivable -
 
Other
         
   
Preferred Stock
 
Paid-in
 
Common Stock
 
Paid-in
 
Director and
 
Comprehensive
 
Accumulated
     
Description
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Capital
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Capital
 
Stockholder
 
Income (Loss)
 
(Deficit)
 
Totals
 
                                           
Balance - December 31, 2005
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
61,350,180
 
$
6,135
 
$
907,783
 
$
(475,000
)
$
3,769
 
$
(486,530
)
$
(43,843
)
                                                               
Correction of common stock for fractional shares
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
21
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
 
 
                                                             
Issuance of Series A preferred stock for services rendered
   
1,000
   
-
   
150,000
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
150,000
 
                                                               
Israeli currency translation
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
36,642
   
-
   
36,642
 
                                                               
Net (loss) for the period
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(828,232
)
 
(828,232
)
                                                               
Balance - December 31, 2006
 
$
1,000
 
$
-
 
$
150,000
 
$
61,350,201
 
$
6,135
 
$
907,783
 
$
(475,000
)
$
40,411
 
$
(1,314,762
)
$
(685,433
)
                                                               
Issuance of common stock for payments on convertible notes and accrued interest
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
17,784,106
   
1,778
   
2,103,194
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
2,104,972
 
                                                               
Israeli currency translation
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
14,114
   
-
   
14,114
 
                                                               
Net (loss) for the period
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(2,186,983
)
 
(2,186,983
)
                                                               
Balance - December 31, 2007
 
$
1,000
 
$
-
 
$
150,000
 
$
79,134,307
 
$
7,913
 
$
3,010,977
 
$
(475,000
)
$
54,525
 
$
(3,501,745
)
$
(753,330
)

The accompanying notes to financial statements are
an integral part of these statements.

F-5

 
INROB TECH LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (NOTE 2)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007, AND 2006

   
2007
 
2006
 
Operating Activities:
             
Net (loss)
 
$
(2,186,983
)
$
(828,232
)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
             
Depreciation and amortization
   
106,427
   
78,567
 
Amortization of debt issuance costs
   
305,910
   
21,281
 
Series A preferred stock issued for officer's compensation
   
-
   
150,000
 
Reserve for (recovery of ) loss on contract
   
(39,141
)
 
(10,956
)
Loss on sale of vehicles
   
1,232
   
-
 
Changes in net assets and liabilities-
             
Accounts receivable
   
(103,769
)
 
64,651
 
Inventories
   
204,028
   
(234,465
)
Cost of uncompleted contracts in excess of billings
   
104,964
   
28,612
 
Prepaid expenses and deposits
   
(8,775
)
 
5,702
 
Manufacturing contract deposit
   
(982,000
)
 
-
 
Accounts payable - Trade and accrued liabilities
   
417,547
   
124,128
 
Billings on uncompleted contracts in excess of related costs
   
60,907
   
133,431
 
Deferred revenue
   
(202,704
)
 
310,781
 
Income taxes payable and other
   
19,643
   
(20,147
)
               
Net Cash (Used in) Operating Activities
   
(2,302,714
)
 
(176,647
)
               
Investing Activities:
             
Proceeds from sale of vehicles
   
20,487
   
-
 
Purchases of and adjustments to property and equipment
   
(326,291
)
 
(89,114
)
               
Net Cash (Used in) Investing Activities
   
(305,804
)
 
(89,114
)
               
Financing Activities:
             
Proceeds from long-term debt
   
247,987
   
-
 
Payments on long-term debt
   
(68,961
)
 
(324,225
)
Proceeds from bank overdrafts
   
96,960
   
54,549
 
Payment on convertible debenture and related interest
   
-
   
(46,750
)
Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes
   
3,000,000
   
3,000,000
 
Debt issuance costs - Convertible notes
   
(355,263
)
 
(340,500
)
Loan receivable - Director and stockholder
   
27,447
   
-
 
Interest on loan receivable - Director and stockholder
   
(46,537
)
 
(18,962
)
Proceeds from loan from related party - Investor group
   
17,236
   
161,202
 
Due from related party - Director and stockholder
   
-
   
(490
)
Due to related parties
   
(76,202
)
 
-
 
Received from (loans to) related party companies
   
(39,659
)
 
22,666
 
               
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
   
2,803,008
   
2,507,490
 
               
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents
   
14,114
   
36,642
 
               
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
   
208,604
   
2,278,371
 
               
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Beginning of Period
   
2,278,371
   
-
 
               
Cash and Cash Equivalents - End of Period
 
$
2,486,975
 
$
2,278,371
 

The accompanying notes to financial statements are
an integral part of these statements.
 
F-6


INROB TECH LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (NOTE 2)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007, AND 2006
 
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
 
   
2007
 
2006
 
Cash paid during the periods for:
             
Interest
 
$
43,336
 
$
64,213
 
Income taxes
 
$
-
 
$
20,147
 

Supplemental Information of Noncash Investing and Financing Activities:

During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company issued 17,784,106 shares of its common stock as payment of $1,534,611 of principal and $570,361 of accrued interest on certain convertible notes.

The accompanying notes to financial statements are
an integral part of these statements.
 
F-7

 
INROB TECH LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007, AND 2006
 
(1)
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Organization and Basis of Presentation

Inrob Tech Ltd. (“Inrob Tech” or the “Company”) is a Nevada corporation which provides engineering products and services for the maintenance of critical and sophisticated equipment, and the integration and production of advanced wireless control solutions for unmanned ground vehicle robots (“UVR”). The remote control systems of the Company are the “brains” for many UVR solutions. The current nature of Israel’s security situation coupled with the Company’s close work with the Israeli Defense Forces (“IDF”) and the Israeli police, has helped the Company gain extensive experience in a wide range of military and law enforcement UVR applications and control solutions. The Company has also targeted the civilian applications market, which includes solar powered equipment, and dangerous tasks such as nuclear plant maintenance, inspection and decommissioning, the demolition industry, and firefighting and rescue services. The accompanying financial statements of Inrob Tech were prepared from the accounts of the Company under the accrual basis of accounting in United States dollars. In addition, the accompanying financial statements reflect the completion of a reverse merger between Inrob Tech and Inrob Ltd. (“Inrob Israel”), which was effected on July 21, 2005.

Prior to the completion of the reverse merger, Inrob Tech was a near dormant corporation with virtually no assets or operations (essentially since April 1, 2001, when the Company sold its paging business, known as The Sports Page and Score Page to BeepMe, to a third party vendor and creditor). The Company was originally incorporated in the State of Nevada under the name of Beeper Plus, Inc. On July 15, 2003, the Company then changed its name to Western Gaming Corporation. On August 17, 2005, the Company again changed its name to Inrob Tech Ltd. to reflect the reverse merger effected on July 21, 2005, and its new business plan.

Inrob Israel was organized as an Israeli corporation in 1988, under the name of Eligal Laboratories Ltd., and its UVR solutions include: (i) remote control systems (the “brains” of any robot); (ii) complete robot systems; and (iii) customized solutions. Inrob Israel is certified to design, manufacture and maintain electronic, optical and electro-mechanical equipment, and is a certified supplier to the Israeli Defense Forces and the Israeli Air Force. It has also been issued a certificate from the Israeli Air Force stating that its quality system is approved to perform inspections of products and services supplied to the Israeli Air Force. Inrob Israel changed its name to Inrob Ltd. in September 2003.

In addition, in January 2004, Inrob Israel completed two equity purchase transactions with separate entities and raised $195,000 from the issuance of 30,000,000 shares of its common stock. Thereafter, Inrob Israel commenced a registration activity of such shares of its common stock on behalf of the two entities as selling shareholders on Form F-1 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The registration activity continued through December 31, 2004, and into the year 2005. In early 2005, Inrob Israel decided not to complete the registration of the common stock of the selling shareholders with the SEC, and withdrew its registration statement on July 28, 2005. As an alternative transaction, effective July 21, 2005, Inrob Israel completed the reverse merger with Inrob Tech, a publicly traded Nevada corporation.
 
F-8


INROB TECH LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007, AND 2006
 
Given that Inrob Israel is considered to have acquired Inrob Tech by a reverse merger through a Stock Purchase Agreement, and its sole stockholder currently has voting control of the Company, the accompanying financial statements and related disclosures in the notes to financial statements present the financial position as of December 31, 2007, and the operations for the two years in the period ended December 31, 2007, of Inrob Israel under the name of Inrob Tech Ltd. The reverse merger has been recorded as a recapitalization of the Company, with the net assets of Inrob Israel and Inrob Tech brought forward at their historical bases. The costs associated with the reverse merger have been expensed as incurred.

The consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2007, include the accounts of Inrob Tech Ltd., Inrob Israel through a reverse merger transaction, and a wholly owned subsidiary, Inrob Philippines, Incorporated. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents  

For purposes of reporting within the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all cash on hand, cash accounts not subject to withdrawal restrictions or penalties, and all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash and cash equivalents.

  Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable consist of amounts due from customers, employees and related parties. The Company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts in amounts sufficient to absorb potential losses on accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2007, no allowance for doubtful accounts was deemed necessary. While management uses the best information available upon which to base estimates, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if economic conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used for the purpose of analysis.

  Revenue Recognition

The Company generates revenues from product sales and maintenance service contracts.

Revenues from product sales are recognized on a completed-contract basis, in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “ Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements ” (“SAB 104”) and Statement of Position 81-1, “ Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts. ” Revenue is recognized when delivery has occurred provided there is persuasive evidence of an agreement, acceptance tests results have been approved by the customer, the fee is fixed or determinable and collection of the related receivable is probable. Customers are billed, according to individual agreements, upon completion of the contract. All product costs are deferred and recognized on completion of the contract and customer acceptance. A provision is made for the amount of any expected loss on a contract at the time it is known.
 
F-9


INROB TECH LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007, AND 2006
 
On-going maintenance service contracts are negotiated separately at an additional fee. The maintenance service is separate from the functionality of the products, which can function without on-going maintenance. Revenues relating to maintenance service contracts are recognized as the services are rendered ratably over the period of the related contract.

The Company is not required to perform significant post-delivery obligations, does not provide warranties and does not allow product returns. As such, no provision is made for costs of this nature.

The Company does not sell products with multiple deliverables. It is management’s opinion that EITF 00-21, “ Revenue Arrangements With Multiple Deliverables ” is not applicable.
 
Property and Equipment

The components of property and equipment are stated at cost. Property and equipment costs are depreciated or amortized for financial reporting purposes over the useful lives of the related assets by the straight-line method. Useful lives utilized by the Company for calculating depreciation or amortization are as follows:
 
Computer and office equipment
5 to 10 years
Furniture and fixtures
3 to 15 years
Vehicles
5 to 6 years
Leasehold improvements
10 years
 
Upon disposition of an asset, its cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is recognized.

Lease Obligations

All noncancellable leases with an initial term greater than one year are categorized as either capital or operating leases. Assets recorded under capital leases are amortized according to the same methods employed for property and equipment or over the term of the related lease, if shorter.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company evaluates the recoverability of long-lived assets and the related estimated remaining lives when events or circumstances lead management to believe that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. For the periods ended December 31, 2007, and 2006, no events or circumstances occurred for which an evaluation of the recoverability of long-lived assets was required.

F-10


INROB TECH LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007, AND 2006
 
Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) attributable to the common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed similar to basic earnings (loss) per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive.

Common Stock Registration Expenses

The Company considers incremental costs and expenses related to the registration of equity securities with the SEC, whether by contractual arrangement as of a certain date or by demand, to be unrelated to original issuance transactions. As such, subsequent registration costs and expenses are reflected in the accompanying financial statements as general and administrative expenses, and are expensed as incurred.

  Research and Development Costs

The Company conducts research and development activities for others under contractual arrangements. Research and development costs incurred under contractual arrangements are accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 68, “Research and Development Agreements” (“SFAS No. 68”). All costs incurred under the contractual arrangements are deferred and recognized as cost of sales (product sales) upon completion of the contract work.

Deferred Offering Costs

The Company defers as other assets the direct incremental costs of raising capital until such time as the offering is completed. At the time of the completion of the offering, the costs are charged against the capital raised. Should the offering be terminated, deferred offering costs are charged to operations during the period in which the offering is terminated.

Debt Issuance Costs

The Company defers as other assets the costs associated with the issuance of debt instruments. Such costs are amortized as additional interest expense over the life of the related debt. During the period ended December 31, 2007, the Company recorded $695,763 of debt issuance costs related to convertible notes, and amortized $327,191 of such costs as additional interest expense.

Advertising and Promotion Costs

Advertising and promotion costs are charged to operations when incurred. For the periods ended December 31, 2007, and 2006, advertising and promotion costs amounted to $34,476 and $92,867, respectively.

F-11


INROB TECH LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007, AND 2006
 
Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The Company presents comprehensive income (loss) in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, “ Reporting Comprehensive Income” (“SFAS No. 130”). SFAS No. 130 states that all items that are required to be recognized under accounting standards as components of comprehensive income (loss) be reported in the financial statements. For the periods ended December 31, 2007, and 2006, the only components of comprehensive (loss) were the net (loss) for the periods, and the foreign currency translation adjustments.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes pursuant to SFAS No. 109, “ Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS No. 109”). Under SFAS No. 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the bases of certain assets and liabilities for income tax and financial reporting purposes. The deferred tax assets and liabilities are classified according to the financial statement classification of the assets and liabilities generating the differences.
The Company maintains a valuation allowance with respect to deferred tax assets. The Company establishes a valuation allowance based upon the potential likelihood of realizing the deferred tax asset and taking into consideration the Company’s financial position and results of operations for the current period. Future realization of the deferred tax benefit depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income within the carryforward period under the Federal tax laws.

Changes in circumstances, such as the Company generating taxable income, could cause a change in judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax asset. Any change in the valuation allowance will be included in income in the year of the change in estimate.

Foreign Currency Translation

The Company accounts for foreign currency translation pursuant to SFAS No. 52, “ Foreign Currency Translation” (“SFAS No. 52”). The Company’s functional currency is the Israeli New Shekel. Under SFAS No. 52, all assets and liabilities are translated into United States dollars using the current exchange rate at the end of each fiscal period. Revenues and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates prevailing throughout the respective periods. Translation adjustments are included in other comprehensive income (loss) for the period. Certain transactions of the Company are denominated in United States dollars. Translation gains or losses related to such transactions are recognized for each reporting period in the related statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company estimates the fair value of financial instruments using the available market information and valuation methods. Considerable judgment is required in estimating fair value. Accordingly, the estimates of fair value may not be indicative of the amounts the Company could realize in a current market exchange. As of December 31, 2007, the Company’s financial instruments approximated fair value to do the nature and maturity of such instruments.
 
F-12


INROB TECH LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007, AND 2006
 
Estimates

The financial statements are prepared on the basis of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2007, and revenues and expenses for the periods ended December 31, 2007, and 2006. Actual results could differ from those estimates made by management.

(2)
Going Concern

During the years ended December 31, 2007, and 2006, Inrob Tech continued its operations, business expansion, and capital formation activities through the issuance of convertible debt. On November 15, 2006, the Company completed a subscription agreement with a group of accredited investors for the issuance of Convertible Notes in the amount of $3,000,000. The maturity date of the Convertible Notes is two years from the date of issuance – November 15, 2008. Net proceeds to the Company amounted to $2,659,500, after deducting debt issuance costs. On March 27, 2007, the Company effected a second subscription agreement with a group of accredited investors for the issuance of Convertibles Notes also in the amount of $3,000,000. The maturity date of the second issuance of Convertible Notes is two years from the date of issuance – March 27, 2009. The second transaction was completed under essentially the same terms and conditions as the first issuance. In additional, under the terms of the transactional documents, all rights and benefits to be granted to the investors (including the security interest) are identical to and are intended to be shared equally with the holders of the Convertible Notes and warrants issued by the Company as of November 15, 2006. Proceeds from the second subscription agreement amounted to approximately $2,594,738 after debt issuance costs. As described in Note 8, on October 23, 2007, the terms of the second issuance of Convertible Notes were amended by agreement between the accredited investors of the second issuance of Convertible Notes and the Company.

On December 24, 2007, the Company through its wholly owned subsidiary, Inrob Philippines, Incorporated, entered into a Manufacturing Agreement with CP Communications Services, Inc., (“CPCOM”) a Philippines corporation located in Makati City, Philippines. The Agreement provides for the lease of the use of CPCOM’s premises on a full turnkey basis. Under the terms of the Agreement, CPCOM is committing to manufacture, and the Company has the right to order, products with a total value of up to $28,500,000. In order to secure this right, the Company is required to pay to CPCOM an amount of $2,950,000, of which $1,000,000 was due by December 31, 2007, with the balance due and payable by March 31, 2008. As of December 31, 2007, the Company had paid $980,000 to CPCOM, which was considered as satisfaction of the initial $1,000,000 obligation.
 
F-13


INROB TECH LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007, AND 2006
 
While management of the Company believes that the Company will be successful in increasing its working capital from operations and the generation of additional business revenues from new and existing clients, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to generate the funds needed to meet its debt and working capital obligations under its business plan, or be successful in the sale of its products and services to generate sufficient revenues to allow the Company to achieve profitability, and to sustain its operations.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has incurred operating losses, and had negative working capital as of December 31, 2007. These and other factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

(3)
Inventories

As of December 31, 2007, inventories consisted of the following:
 
   
2007
 
       
Work in progress
 
$
461,733
 
Materials
   
46,011
 
Total
 
$
507,744
 


(4)
Loan Receivable – Director and Stockholder

As discussed in Note 9, in July 2005, Inrob Israel purchased, on behalf of Ben-Tsur Joseph, President, sole Director and stockholder, 2,057,415 shares of common stock of Inrob Tech in connection with the reverse merger. The amount of consideration provided by Inrob Israel for the shares was $475,000. Thereafter, Mr. Joseph entered into a Share Transfer and Loan Agreement with Inrob Israel whereby the company transferred to Mr. Joseph 2,057,415 shares of the common stock of Inrob Tech in exchange for a promissory note issued by Mr. Joseph in the amount of $475,000. The promissory note carries an interest rate of four (4) percent per annum, and is payable to Inrob Israel on demand. As of December 31, 2007, the balance owed on the loan plus accrued interest amounted to $521,537. The Company has classified the amount of the promissory note due from Mr. Joseph, or $475,000, as an offset to common stock equity, due to the nature of the transaction as a common stock subscription arrangement.

F-14


INROB TECH LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007, AND 2006
 
(5)
Loan to and Interest Receivable from Related Parties
 
A loan to a related party entity bears interest at a variable rate equivalent to the minimum rate allowed by the Israel Income Tax Ordinance (4% percent), is unsecured and is due, including principal and interest, on December 31, 2008. Interest receivable from Mr. Joseph associated with the loan transaction described in Note 4 above amounted to $46,537 as of December 31, 2007. The following summarizes the amounts receivable as of December 31, 2007:
 
   
2007
 
       
Ben-Tsur Joseph Holdings Ltd.
 
$
274,061
 
Totals
 
$
274,061
 
 
(6)
Bank Indebtedness

The Company has certain loans and bank arrangements to fund its operations in Israel which are described as follows:

   
2007
 
       
Bank Loan #1:
       
         
Monthly payments including interest at 6% per annum, matures February 27, 2008, secured.
 
$
2,986
 
         
Bank Loan #2:
       
         
Monthly payments including interest at 5% per annum, matures November 5, 2012, secured.
   
126,025
 
         
Automobile Loans:
       
Monthly payments including interest at 4.5% per annum, matures June 29, 2012, secured.
   
101,712
 
Totals
   
230,723
 
         
Less - Current portion
   
(46,931
)
Total Bank Loans
 
$
183,792
 
 
F-15


INROB TECH LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007, AND 2006
 
Principal repayments of bank debt are as follows:  

2008
 
$
46,931
 
2009
   
46,085
 
2010
   
48,328
 
2011
   
50,682
 
2012
   
38,697
 
Totals
 
$
230,723
 
 
(7)
Convertible Debenture

On September 30, 2005, the Company issued a convertible debenture (the “Debenture”) in the amount of $42,500 to a third-party entity. The Debenture carried an interest rate of ten (10) percent per annum, was due on November 30, 2005, and was convertible into 2,000,000 publicly traded shares of the Company’s common stock. The due date of the Debenture was extended to December 31, 2006, by written agreement between the parties. In addition, effective September 30, 2006, the third-party entity executed a document wherein it indicated that it had waived its right to convert the Debenture to common stock of the Company. In November 2006, the Debenture, together with accrued interest, for a total amount of $46,750, was paid off.

(8)
Issuance of Convertible Notes and Warrants

On November 15, 2006, the Company effected a subscription agreement with a group of accredited investors under Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which provided for the issuance to the investors, exempt from registration, of certain 8 percent convertible notes (the “Convertible Notes”) in the principal amount of $3,000,000. The maturity date of the Convertible Notes is two years from the date of issuance – November 15, 2008.

Payments amortizing the outstanding principal amount and related interest under the Convertible Notes will commence on the third month anniversary date of the date of issuance (February 15, 2007) and on the same day of each month thereafter until the principal amount and interest have been repaid in full. On each repayment date, the Company is required to make payments to the investors in the amount of 4.76 percent of the initial principal amount and all interest accrued on the Convertible Notes as of the repayment date. Upon an event of default, the interest rate will automatically be increased to 15 percent. At the Company’s election, monthly repayments may be made (i) in cash in an amount equal to 115 percent of the principal amount component of the monthly payment, and 100 percent of all other components, or (ii) in shares of registered common stock of the Company at a conversion price equal to the lesser of (a) $0.25, or (b) 75 percent of the average of the closing bid price of the common stock of the Company as reported by Bloomberg L.P. for the common stock’s principal market for the five trading days preceding the date a notice of conversion given to the Company after the Company notifies the holder of the Convertible Notes of its election to make a monthly repayment in shares of registered common stock.
 
F-16


INROB TECH LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007, AND 2006
 
Provided there is no default under the Convertible Notes, the Company may prepay the outstanding principal amount of the Convertible Notes at a 20 percent premium, together with accrued but unpaid interest thereon and any and all other sums due.

The investors have a right to convert the Convertible Notes into registered shares of common stock of the Company at $0.25 per share. Upon an event of default, the conversion price shall be the lesser of $0.25 or 75 percent of the average of the closing bid prices of the common stock of the Company for the five trading days prior to a conversion date. No conversions may take place if it would cause an investor to become the beneficial owner of more than 4.99 percent of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company, which limitation is subject to waiver by an investor upon 61 days prior written notice to the Company.

The Company has granted a security interest in all of its assets, and the assets of Inrob Israel to secure its obligations under the Convertible Notes. Further, in connection with the Convertible Note transaction, the Company has determined that there was no beneficial conversion feature recorded.

The Company also issued Class A warrants to purchase 6,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.40 per share and Class B warrants to purchase 6,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.50 per share. All warrants are exercisable for a period of five years following the effective date of a registration statement filed with the SEC, which the Company agreed to complete.

The Company filed a Registration Statement on Form SB-2 with the SEC on December 20, 2006, to register 18,405,000 shares of common stock related to the Convertible Notes. The Registration Statement was declared effective by the SEC on January 11, 2007.

In connection with the issuance of the Convertible Notes, the Company incurred $340,500 in debt issuance costs, which included $300,000 paid in cash as a finder’s fee. The Company is obligated to pay additional finder’s fees in the amount of ten percent of the proceeds generated from the exercise of Class A and Class B warrants. In addition, the Company also issued 1,200,000 warrants to the finder (similar to and carrying the same rights as the Class A warrants issued to the investors in the Convertible Notes) to purchase a like number of shares of common stock of the Company for $0.25 per share. Such warrants are exercisable for a period of five years following the effective date of the Registration Statement filed by the Company with the SEC.

On March 27, 2007, the Company effected a second subscription agreement with a group of accredited investors under Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which provided for the issuance to the investors, exempt from registration, of certain 8 percent convertible notes (the “Convertible Notes”) in the principal amount of $3,000,000. The maturity date of the Convertible Notes is two years from the date of issuance – March 27, 2009. The transaction was completed under essentially the same terms and conditions as the first issuance described above. In additional, under the terms of the transactional documents, all rights and benefits to be granted to the investors (including the security interest) were identical to and intended to be shared equally with the holders of the Convertible Notes and warrants issued by the Company as of November 15, 2006. Proceeds from the second subscription agreement amounted to approximately $2,594,738 after debt issuance costs.
 
F-17


INROB TECH LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007, AND 2006
 
The Company filed a Registration Statement on Form SB-2 with the SEC on May 7, 2007, to register 18,405,000 shares of common stock related to the second issuance of Convertible Notes. Under the terms of the Subscription Agreement pertaining to the second issuance of Convertible Notes, the Company had 160 days from the date of filing a Registration Statement on Form SB-2 with the SEC to obtain an approval from the SEC on such Registration Statement. However, after filing two amendments to this Registration Statement with the SEC, on October 18, 2007, the Company withdrew the Registration Statement. Subsequently, on October 23, 2007, the Company entered into an amendment agreement (the “Amendment Agreement”) with the accredited investors to the second issuance of Convertible Notes of March 27, 2007. Under the terms of the Amendment Agreement, the Company was no longer required to register the shares issuable upon conversion of the Convertible Notes and exercise of the warrants issued in connection with the March 27, 2007 agreement. The interest rate under the second issuance of Convertible Notes was increased to 18 percent and was deemed to have accrued from the date of issuance (March 27, 2007) of the Convertible Notes. The Company is also required to make principal and interest payments under the Convertible Notes in common stock only at 75 percent of the average of the closing bid price of the common stock for the five trading days preceding the date an interest or principal payment, as the case may be, is due. In addition, the exercise price of the warrants was reduced to $0.25 and their expiration date was fixed at the sixth anniversary of the closing date of the March 2007 second issuance of Convertible Notes.

For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company issued 17,784,106 shares of its common stock as payment of $1,534,611 of principal and $570,361 of accrued interest related to Convertible Notes.

(9)
Capital Stock Transactions

On October 4, 2006, pursuant to authorization by the shareholders of the Company, Inrob Tech filed Amended Articles of Incorporation with the Nevada Secretary of State to increase the number of authorized shares of its common stock from 80,000,000 shares authorized to 380,000,000 shares, and to change the par value of its preferred and common stock from $0.001 per share to $0.0001 per share. Subsequent to the filing, the Company was authorized to issue a total of 400,000,000 shares, consisting of 380,000,000 shares of common stock and 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock, all with a par value of $0.0001 per share. In connection with the change in par value of preferred and common stock described above, all prior transactions involving common stock with a par value of $0.001 have restated to reflect the new par value of $0.0001 in the accompanying financial statements.

On November 9, 2006, pursuant to written consent provided by the board of directors, the Company established 1,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 with the Nevada Secretary of State. Each share of Series A Preferred Stock carries voting rights equal to 400,000 shares of common stock of the Company. In addition, the board of directors authorized the issuance of 1,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock to Mr. Ben-Tsur Joseph, President and Director of the Company for services rendered. The issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock was valued at $150,000.
 
F-18


INROB TECH LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007, AND 2006
 
As described in Note 8, in November 2006, the Company issued Class A warrants to purchase 6,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.40 per share, and Class B warrants to purchase 6,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.50 per share. In addition, 1,200,000 finder’s warrants were also issued to purchase 1,200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.25 per share. All warrants are exercisable for a period of five years following the effective date of a registration statement filed with the SEC, which the Company received on January 11, 2007.

In connection with the second issuance of Convertible Notes completed in March 2007, the Company also issued Class A warrants to purchase 6,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.40 per share, and Class B warrants to purchase 6,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.50 per share. In addition, 1,200,000 finder’s warrants were also issued to purchase 1,200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.25 per share. All warrants were exercisable for a period of five years following the effective date of a registration statement filed with the SEC. As described in Note 8, effective October 23, 2007, the exercise price of the warrants pertaining to the second issuance of Convertible Notes was reduced to $0.25 and their expiration date was fixed at the sixth anniversary of the closing date of the March 2007 second issuance of Convertible Notes.

(10)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “ The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 ” (“SFAS No. 159”), which permits entities to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. An entity would report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. The decision about whether to elect the fair value option is applied instrument by instrument, with a few exceptions; the decision is irrevocable; and it is applied only to entire instruments and not to portions of instruments. SFAS No. 159 requires disclosures that facilitate comparisons (a) between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar assets and liabilities and (b) between assets and liabilities in the financial statements of an entity that selects different measurement attributes for similar assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of a fiscal year, provided the entity also elects to apply the provisions of SFAS No. 157. Upon implementation, an entity shall report the effect of the first re-measurement to fair value as a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. Since the provisions of SFAS No. 159 are applied prospectively, any potential impact will depend on the instruments selected for fair value measurement at the time of implementation. The management of the Company does not believe that this new pronouncement will have a material impact on its financial statements.
 
F-19


INROB TECH LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007, AND 2006
 
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, “ Business Combinations  Revised 2007 ” (“SFAS No. 141R”), which replaces FASB Statement No. 141, “ Business Combinations .” SFAS No. 141R   establishes principles and requirements intending to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of information that a reporting entity provides in its financial reports about a business combination and its effects. This is accomplished through requiring the acquirer to recognize assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contractual contingencies as of the acquisition date, measured at their acquisition-date fair values. This includes contractual contingencies only if it is more likely than not that they meet the definition of an asset of a liability in FASB Concepts Statement No. 6, “ Elements of Financial Statements  – a replacement of FASB Concepts Statement No. 3.   This statement also requires the acquirer to recognize goodwill as of the acquisition date, measured as a residual. However, this statement improves the way in which an acquirer’s obligations to make payments conditioned on the outcome of future events are recognized and measured, which in turn improves the measure of goodwill. This statement also defines a bargain purchase as a business combination in which the total acquisition-date fair value of the consideration transferred plus any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, and it requires the acquirer to recognize that excess in earnings as a gain attributable to the acquirer. This, therefore, improves the representational faithfulness and completeness of the information provided about both the acquirer’s earnings during the period in which it makes a bargain purchase and the measures of the assets acquired in the bargain purchase. The Company does not expect the adoption of this pronouncement to have a material impact on its financial statements.
 
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “ Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements An Amendment of ARB No. 51 ” (“SFAS No. 160”),   which establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Specifically, this statement requires the recognition of a noncontrolling interest (minority interest) as equity in the consolidated financial statements and separate from the parent’s equity. The amount of net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest will be included in consolidated net income on the face of the income statement. SFAS No. 160 clarifies that changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation are equity transactions if the parent retains its controlling financial interest. In addition, this statement requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. Such gain or loss will be measured using the fair value of the noncontrolling equity investment on the deconsolidation date. SFAS No. 160 also includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding the interests of the parent and its noncontrolling interest.

SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The management of the Company does not expect the adoption of this pronouncement to have a material impact on its financial statements.
 
F-20


INROB TECH LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007, AND 2006
 
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities An Amendment of FASB Statement 133” (“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS No. 161 enhances required disclosures regarding derivatives and hedging activities, including enhanced disclosures regarding how: (a) an entity uses derivative instruments; (b) derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FASB No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” ; and (c) derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. Specifically, FASB No. 161 requires:

 
Disclosure of the objectives for using derivative instruments be disclosed in terms of underlying risk and accounting designation;
 
Disclosure of the fair values of derivative instruments and their gains and losses in a tabular format;
 
Disclosure of information about credit-risk-related contingent features; and
 
Cross-reference from the derivative footnote to other footnotes in which derivative-related information is disclosed.

FASB No. 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. Earlier application is encouraged. The management of the Company does not expect the adoption of this pronouncement to have a material impact on its financial statements.

(11)
Related Party Transactions

Inrob Israel entered into a management agreement with a Director and officer on October 1, 2003, which was subsequently extended as to its commencement date to May 1, 2005. Other terms and conditions related to equipment usage commenced with the original date of the agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company is obligated to pay $15,000 per month during the first year and $20,000 per month thereafter for management fees. For the periods ended December 31, 2007, and 2006, the Company accrued $240,000 and $220,000, respectively under the management agreement. The Director and officer agreed to offset approximately $205,000 owed to the Company by a related party entity of the Director and officer against the management fee liability. The management agreement does not have a specific completion date, but may be terminated by either party on written notice of three months.

As described in Note 9 above, in July 2005, Inrob Israel purchased, on behalf of Ben-Tsur Joseph, its President, Director and sole stockholder, 2,057,415 shares of common stock of Inrob Tech in connection with the reverse merger. The amount of consideration provided by Inrob Israel for the shares was $475,000. Thereafter, Mr. Joseph entered into a Share Transfer and Loan Agreement with Inrob Israel whereby the company transferred to Mr. Joseph 2,057,415 shares of the common stock of Inrob Tech in exchange for a promissory note issued by Mr. Joseph in the amount of $475,000. The promissory note carries an interest rate of four (4) percent per annum, and is payable to Inrob Israel on demand. The Company has classified the amount of the promissory note due from Mr. Joseph, or $475,000, as an offset to common stock equity, due to the nature of the transaction as a common stock subscription arrangement.
 
F-21


INROB TECH LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007, AND 2006
 
As of December 31, 2007, Mr. Ben-Tsur Joseph, President and Director of the Company, had loaned a total of $2,849 to the Company for working capital purposes. The loan is unsecured, non-interest bearing, and has no terms for repayment.

(12)
Commitments and Contingencies

For the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company was a party to a lease agreement in Israel for its premises which expired in January, 2006. In 2006, the Company entered into a new one-year lease agreement, with an option to extend the agreement for an additional year for the use of 1,135 square meters of office and engineering/operations space. The Company paid approximately $23,000 in operating lease payments for its premises through June 2006. Thereafter, effective July 1, 2006, the Company entered into a new lease agreement for 300 square meters of space. The Company leased the space for a period of three years. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company paid approximately $12,600 in operating lease payments for its premises. Minimum lease payments for the years 2008, and 2009 under the lease agreement will be $12,600 and $6,300, respectively. After the initial term, the Company has two option periods to extend the lease through 2013.

The Company leases on a month-to-month basis approximately 175.3 square meters of warehouse space at the same facility that it occupies for production and office space. The monthly rental amount for the warehouse space is $913 per month.

The Company leases four autos under an operating lease agreement which expires in December 2008. Minimum annual payments under the operating lease amount to $23,424 per year.

The Company also entered into two sublease agreements for its leased premises in Israel which expired on December 31, 2005. Subsequent to December 31, 2005, the sublease agreements continued on a month-to-month basis until April, 2006, and June, 2006, respectively, when the parties to the sublease agreements moved from the leased premises of the Company. For the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company received approximately $10,716 of sublease income from the two parties.

In December 2005, the Company entered into an agreement for securing capital financing, and services related to stockholder relations and introductory services to market makers with an unrelated entity. The terms of the agreement required a payment of $50,000 at the commencement of the services which began in January 2006, and $10,000 per month thereafter for a period of six months. For the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company paid $110,000 for services related to the agreement. Funding for the agreement was provided by an advance from a related party investor group.

In February 2006, the Company entered into an agreement with MoneyTV for certain media services related to the promotion of the Company on an international level. The agreement required the payment of a fee of $11,500 for such services. Funding for the agreement was provided by an advance from a related party investor group.
 
F-22


INROB TECH LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007, AND 2006
 
On December 24, 2007, the Company through its wholly owned subsidiary, Inrob Philippines, Incorporated, entered into a Manufacturing Agreement with CP Communications Services, Inc. (“CPCOM”), a Philippines corporation located in Makati City, Philippines. The Agreement provides for the lease of the use of CPCOM's premises on a full turnkey basis. Under the terms of the Agreement, CPCOM is committing to manufacture, and the Company has the right to order, products with a total value of up to $28,500,000. In order to secure this right, the Company is required to pay to CPCOM an amount of $2,950,000, of which $1,000,000 was due by December 31, 2007, with the balance due and payable by March 31, 2008. The Agreement will remain in effect for an unlimited period of time. However, the Agreement may be terminated by the Company at any time for any reason upon ten days prior notice without refund of amounts paid. As of December 31, 2007, the Company had paid $980,000 to CPCOM, which was considered as satisfaction of the $1,000,000 obligation. As of March 31, 2008, the remaining amount due of $1,970,000 was paid by the Company to CPCOM.

(13)
Income Taxes

The provision (benefit) for income tax for the periods ended December 31, 2007, and 2006, were as follows (assuming a 34% effective tax rate):
 
   
2007
 
2006
 
           
Current Tax Provision:
             
Federal-
             
Taxable income
 
$
-
 
$
2,940
 
Total current tax provision
 
$
-
 
$
2,940
 
               
Deferred Tax Provision:
             
Federal-
             
Loss carryforwards
   
743,500
   
281,600
 
Change in valuation allowance
   
(743,500
)
 
(281,600
)
Total deferred tax provision
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
 
The Company had deferred income tax assets as of December 31, 2007, and 2006, as follows:
 
   
2007
 
2006
 
Loss carryforwards
 
$
1,190,500
 
$
447,000
 
Less - Valuation allowance
   
(1,190,500
)
 
(447,000
)
Total net deferred tax assets
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
 
F-23


INROB TECH LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007, AND 2006
 
The Company provided a valuation allowance equal to the deferred income tax assets for the periods ended December 31, 2007, and 2006, because it is not presently known whether future taxable income will be sufficient to utilize the loss carryforwards.

As of December 31, 2007, the Company had approximately $3,501,745 in tax loss carryforwards that can be utilized in future periods to reduce taxable income.

(14)
Significant Customers

For the years ended December 31, 2007, and 2006, the Company had one customer that accounted for more that ten (10) percent of total revenues, as follows:
 
   
2007
 
2006
 
Customer A
 
$
803,089
 
$
643,612
 

F-24

 
Inrob Tech (CE) (USOTC:IRBL)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Mai 2024 bis Jun 2024 Click Here for more Inrob Tech (CE) Charts.
Inrob Tech (CE) (USOTC:IRBL)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Jun 2023 bis Jun 2024 Click Here for more Inrob Tech (CE) Charts.