ITEM
1. BUSINESS
The
Company is a Delaware corporation which was incorporated on November 15, 1988, under the name “Europa Cruises Corporation.”
In 1989, the Company became a publicly-held company. On November 22, 2002, the Company amended its Certificate of Incorporation
to change its name to “Diamondhead Casino Corporation.” The Company currently has three subsidiaries: Mississippi
Gaming Corporation, Casino World, Inc. and Europasky Corporation.
The
Company has no current operations in any state. The Company has had no income or revenue from any operations since 2000. The Company
currently has only one employee who serves in an executive officer capacity.
For
the years ending December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2019, the Company’s limited resources were consumed by extensive litigation
relating to various lawsuits and unsuccessful efforts to obtain financing. See item 3; Legal Proceedings.
Mississippi
The
Company owns, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Mississippi Gaming Corporation, an approximate 400-acre undeveloped property
located at 7051 Interstate 10, Diamondhead, Mississippi 39525 (hereafter “the Diamondhead Property” or “the
Property”). The Company’s intent was to construct a casino resort and other amenities on the Property unilaterally
or in conjunction with one or more joint venture partners. However, the Company has been unable, to date, to obtain financing
to move the project forward and/or enter into a joint venture partnership. There can be no assurance that the substantial funds
required for the design and construction of the project can be obtained or that such funds can be obtained on acceptable terms.
In addition, the Company has been unable to obtain financing to sustain the Company. Due to its lack of financial resources and
certain lawsuits filed by creditors against the Company, the Company was forced to explore other alternatives, including a sale
of part or all of the Property. The Company’s preference is to sell only part of the Property inasmuch as this would appear
to be in the best interest of the stockholders of the Company. However, there can be no assurance the Company will be able to
sell only part of the Property. The Company intends to continue to pursue a joint venture partnership and/or other financing while
seeking a viable purchaser for part or all of the Property. Finally, there can be no assurance that if the requisite financing
for the project were obtained and the project were constructed, that the project would be successful.
The
Company has no current operations in Mississippi, no offices in Mississippi, and no employees in Mississippi.
Property
Zoning
The
Diamondhead Property is located entirely within the City of Diamondhead which is in Hancock County, Mississippi. The City of Diamondhead
incorporated in February of 2012. On October 15, 2012, the Mayor and City Council adopted a Zoning Ordinance in which the City
of Diamondhead zoned the entire Property as “C-2-Interstate Commercial/Gaming/Resort.” Thus, the requisite City zoning
for a casino is currently in place.
Land-Based
Gaming
All
references in this section to Mississippi law are qualified in their entirety by reference to the actual text of the law.
On
August 29, 2005, Hurricane Katrina struck the Gulf coast of the United States causing extensive damage to Louisiana and Mississippi,
including Biloxi, Gulfport, and Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. Hurricane Katrina damaged or destroyed most of the casinos on the
Gulf coast. Prior to Hurricane Katrina, Mississippi law required that casinos on the Gulf coast be built in, on, or above the
water and be located a minimum of fifty percent below mean high tide.
On
October 17, 2005, in response to the devastation caused by Hurricane Katrina, Mississippi passed new legislation that allows casinos
located in certain statutorily-described areas, including St. Louis Bay, where the Diamondhead Property is located, to be constructed
on land no more than 800 feet from the mean high-water line. Under Mississippi’s new legislation, the part of the structure
in which licensed gaming activities are conducted must be located entirely in an area which is located no more than eight hundred
(800) feet from the mean high-water line (as defined in Section 29-15-1 of the Mississippi Code) of the waters within the State
of Mississippi, which lie adjacent to the State of Mississippi south of the three (3) most southern counties in the State of Mississippi,
including the Mississippi Sound, St. Louis Bay, Biloxi Bay and Pascagoula Bay or, with regard to Harrison County only, no farther
north than the southern boundary of the right-of-way for U.S. Highway 90, whichever is greater. In the case of a structure that
is located in whole or part on shore, the part of the structure in which licensed gaming activities are conducted must lie adjacent
to state waters south of the three (3) most southern counties in the State of Mississippi, including the Mississippi Sound, St.
Louis Bay, Biloxi Bay and Pascagoula Bay. When the site upon which the structure is located consists of a parcel of real property,
easements and rights-of-way for public streets and highways are not construed to interrupt the contiguous nature of the parcel,
nor is the footage contained within the easements and rights-of-way counted in the calculation of the distances specified above.
The
Company intends to take full advantage of this legislation.
Annual
In-Lieu Tidelands Assessment
Since
the Company intends to construct a casino on land in Mississippi, the Company will no longer require a tidelands lease from the
Secretary of State. Under Mississippi’s prior law, which required that the Company’s casino be in, on, or above water
and a minimum of fifty percent at or below mean high tide, the Company would have required a tidelands lease to lease water-bottoms
owned by the State.
However,
on or about October 17, 2005, when Mississippi passed new legislation permitting casinos to be built on land in certain locations,
Mississippi also passed a companion law that requires any person possessing a license under the Mississippi Gaming Control Act,
who operates a gaming establishment in any of the three most southern counties of the State (including Hancock County in which
the Company’s Property is located), and who does not lease public trust tidelands from the State, to pay an annual in-lieu
tidelands assessment to the Public Trust Tidelands Assessments Fund. For calendar year 2006, the annual in-lieu tidelands assessment
was between $400,000 and $750,000, based on an escalating scale which is measured by the capital investment in the part of the
structure in which the licensed gaming activities are conducted. For each calendar year thereafter, the Secretary of State is
required to review and adjust the value of the capital investment and the annual in-lieu tidelands assessment due. Such review
and adjustment shall be tied to the Consumer Price Index.
This
annual in-lieu tidelands assessment will apply to any casino constructed on land on the Diamondhead Property, but does not apply
at present and will not apply prior to construction.
Mississippi
Gaming Site Approval
In
the State of Mississippi, in addition to the local casino zoning, which the Company has, a proposed gaming site must obtain
Gaming Site Approval. Only the Mississippi Gaming Commission has the authority to grant Gaming Site Approval. On or about May
29, 2014, the title holder of the Property, Mississippi Gaming Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, applied
for Gaming Site Approval for a fifty (50) acre site on the Diamondhead Property. In its Notice of Intent, the applicant
anticipated the casino would contain approximately 1250 slot machines and approximately 40 table games and contain an
estimated 80,000 square feet of gaming space. On August 21, 2014, the Mississippi Gaming Commission granted Gaming Site
Approval to Mississippi Gaming Corporation for a fifty-acre site on the east side of the Diamondhead Property. There is no
expiration date for Gaming Site Approval.
The
Mississippi Gaming Commission found, in pertinent part, as follows: 1) that in accordance with the Mississippi Gaming Control
Act of 1990, codified as Miss. Code Ann. § 75-76-1 et seq., Miss. Code Ann. § 19-3-79, and Miss. Code Ann. §97-33-1,
as amended, the citizens of Hancock County, Mississippi voted to authorize gaming in Hancock County, and thus gaming is legal
at qualifying locations within Hancock County, Mississippi; that the proposed gaming area is within 800 feet of the mean high
water line of the Bay of St. Louis and is thus a legal gaming site under the Mississippi Control Act of 1990, as amended, and
13 Mississippi Administrative Code Part 2 Rule 2.2(a)(1) and (3); and that the Proposed Site is properly zoned for gaming.
Although
the Gaming Site Approval obtained from the Mississippi Gaming Commission in 2014 does not have any expiration date, assuming the
Mississippi Gaming Commission grants the Company Approval to Proceed with Development at a later date, the Company will have three
years within which to construct its casino and required facilities. The Property owner has not applied for Approval to Proceed
with Development. Thus, this three year period of time has not yet begun to run.
Additional
Permits, Authorizations and Approvals Are Required
In
addition to Gaming Site Approval, the development of the Diamondhead Property requires the Company to obtain additional permits,
authorizations and approvals from various federal, state, county, and/or city agencies, boards and commissions, which may include,
but not be limited to, the following: Mississippi Gaming Commission, Mississippi Department of Transportation, Mississippi Department
of Environmental Quality, Mississippi Department of Marine Resources, Port and Harbor Commission, Levee Board, U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Coast Guard, Hancock County, and/or the
City of Diamondhead. The regulatory environment relating to such permits, authorizations and approvals is uncertain and subject
to constant change. There can be no assurance that all permits, authorizations and/or approvals can be obtained, or that if obtained,
that they will be renewed. While there is no pending environmental litigation, the foregoing permits, authorizations and approvals
remain subject to future litigation and the actions of environmental groups and various federal, state, county and/or local governments
and agencies, including, but not limited to, the foregoing. The Company will be required to spend significant funds to pay the
architects, surveyors, engineers, accountants, attorneys, consultants and other experts required to prepare and process the applications
required for the permits, authorizations and approvals required. The amount ultimately required is unknown at this time, but the
Company does not have any funds required for this purpose. There can be no assurance the Company will be able to obtain the funds
required for this purpose or that it will be able to obtain the funds required on acceptable terms.
Uncertain
Regulatory and Political Environment
The
political environment in which the Company and/or its subsidiaries intend to operate is also uncertain, dynamic and subject to
rapid change. Existing operators often propose and support legislation and/or litigation designed to make it difficult or impossible
for competition to enter a market. This political and regulatory environment makes it impossible to predict the effects that the
adoption of and changes in gaming laws, rules and regulations and/or competition will have on development of a gaming resort.
Moreover, legislatures in states in which gaming is legal often consider wide-ranging legislation and regulations which could
adversely affect operations and expected revenues. Likewise, the federal government often considers legislation which could adversely
affect operations and expected revenues. Some states have legalized internet gaming and the trend to legalize internet gaming
in the remaining states is strong. The long term effects of legalizing internet gaming on the casino industry in general and on
the Company’s proposed casino operations are unknown.
Anti-Gaming
Referenda
On
at least three separate occasions since 1998, certain anti-gaming groups have proposed referenda that, if adopted, would have
banned gaming in Mississippi and required that gaming entities cease operations within two years after the ban. All three of the
proposed referenda were ruled illegal by Mississippi State trial courts. If such a referendum were to be approved by the voters,
it would have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Mississippi
Regulation
The
Company has no current operations in Mississippi and does not operate any gaming facility in Mississippi. The Company intends
to develop the Diamondhead property as a destination casino resort.
Assuming
it is successful in developing its resort, the Company and its subsidiaries and/or affiliates will be subject to federal, state,
county, city and local, laws, rules, ordinances and regulations with respect to the operation of any gaming facility. The following
is intended to serve as a partial description of the Mississippi regulatory environment in which the Company or its subsidiaries
or joint venture partner(s) would seek approvals to construct and operate a gaming facility and is not intended to be a complete,
precise, or up-to-date recitation of all applicable laws, rules, regulations or ordinances that might affect the Company’s
operations or with which the Company would be required to comply. Additional or more restrictive laws, rules and regulations could
be adopted at any time or gambling in Mississippi could be completely banned.
The
location of, ownership of, and operation of gaming facilities in Mississippi are subject to extensive state and local regulation,
primarily through the licensing and control of the Mississippi Gaming Commission and the Mississippi State Tax Commission. The
Company and/or its subsidiaries must register and be licensed under the Mississippi Gaming Control Act and its gaming operations
will be subject to the regulatory control of the Mississippi Gaming Commission, the Mississippi State Tax Commission and various
state, county and local regulatory agencies.
The
Mississippi Gaming Control Act gives the Mississippi Gaming Commission (the “Commission”) extensive power to enforce
the Act and adopt regulations in furtherance of the Act (the “Mississippi Regulations”). The laws, regulations and
supervisory procedures of Mississippi and the Mississippi Gaming Commission seek to: (1) prevent unsavory or unsuitable persons
from having any direct or indirect involvement with gaming at any time or in any capacity; (2) establish and maintain responsible
accounting practices and procedures; (3) maintain effective control over the financial practices of licensees, including establishing
minimum procedures for internal fiscal affairs and safeguarding of assets and revenues, providing reliable record keeping and
making periodic reports to the Mississippi Gaming Commission; (4) prevent cheating and fraudulent practices; (5) provide a source
of state and local revenues through taxation and licensing fees; and (6) ensure that gaming licensees, to the extent practicable,
employ Mississippi residents. The regulations are subject to amendment and interpretation by the Commission. Changes in Mississippi
law or the regulations or the Commission’s interpretation thereof may limit or otherwise materially affect the types of
gaming that may be conducted and could have a material adverse effect on Mississippi gaming operations.
Approval
Process
The
Commission has divided the approval process into two separate phases: (1) gaming site approval; and (2) approval to proceed with
development.
1.
Gaming Site Approval
Mississippi
Gaming Corporation, which holds title to the Property and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, obtained Gaming Site
Approval on August 21, 2014. There is no expiration date on Gaming Site Approval. With respect to gaming site approval,
approval constitutes only the Commission’s finding that the location complies with applicable gaming laws and
regulations. Gaming site approval does not entitle the recipient to proceed with development, nor does it constitute a
license to engage in gaming or a right to a gaming license. Gaming site approval is a revocable privilege and no holder
acquires any vested right therein. The Mississippi Gaming Commission reserves the right to revoke any site approval should
the circumstances change that would make the site illegal or unsuitable.
An
application for gaming site approval in the three most southern counties must include evidence satisfactory to the Commission
in support thereof including: (1) a survey indicating the specific location of the property; (2) the current use of any adjacent
property as well as the location of the nearest residential area, church and school; (3) evidence that all applicable zoning ordinances
allow gaming at the proposed site; and (4) a survey establishing the mean high water line, performed by a qualified surveyor for
performance of tidal surveys.
Gaming
establishments in the three most southern counties in the State of Mississippi, including Hancock County, are permitted to be
permanent inland structures. No point in the gaming area may be more than eight hundred (800) feet from the nineteen (19) year
mean high water line. Harrison County establishments south of Highway 90 may exceed the eight hundred (800) foot measurement up
to the southern boundary of Highway 90. All public easements and rights-of-way for public streets and highways are excluded from
the 800 foot measurement. Any point of reference used to determine the 800 foot distance from the mean high water line must be
located on the applicant or licensee’s premises. The applicant or licensee must own and/or lease the land that is contiguous
both to the parcel used to conduct gaming and the point of reference used to determine the mean high water line, and this land
must be shown to be an integral part of the project. The Commission has final authority in reviewing and approving each site as
it pertains to meeting the requirements of this regulation.
2.
Approval to Proceed with Development
With
respect to obtaining the Commission’s approval to proceed with development, the following information, together with documentation
to support this information, must be submitted to the Commission:
1)
Architectural plans or renderings showing details of all proposed construction and renovation for the project, together with a
footprint of the project and a description of the construction and type of parking facilities, as well as parking lot capacity.
Commission approval requires that the project include a 500-car, or larger parking facility in close proximity to the casino complex,
and infrastructure facilities shall include a 300-room, or larger hotel of at least a three diamond rating as defined by an acceptable
travel publication to be determined by the Commission. In addition, infrastructure facilities must include a restaurant capable
of seating at least 200 people and a fine dining facility capable of seating at least 75 people, and the casino floor must be
at least 40,000 square feet. The project will also have or support an amenity that will be unique to the market and will encourage
economic development and promote tourism. The Commission will have authority in determining the quality of the amenity and the
ultimate approval of the amenity, and may, in its discretion, reduce the requirements above should it determine that there is
a justification to do so in certain markets. The Commission will further determine, in its discretion, if the prerequisite hotel
and dining facilities may be supplanted by an amenity of high value to the overall tourism market in that the amenity will likely
encourage economic development and promote tourism. As used herein, infrastructure facilities are not such items as parking facilities,
roads, sewage and water systems, or civic facilities normally provided by cities and/or counties.
The
qualifying infrastructure must be owned or leased by; (i) the holder of the site approval, or (ii) an affiliated company of the
holder of the site approval where both the affiliated company and the holder of the site approval have identical direct or indirect
equity ownership. This regulation shall apply to any new applicant for a gaming license for a new gaming facility and to the acquisition
or purchase of a licensee or gaming facility for which gaming operations have ceased prior to the time of acquisition or purchase.
It does not apply to any licensee, who has been licensed by the Commission, or to any person which has received Approval to Proceed
with Development from the Commission prior to December 31, 2013 (or to such licensee upon any licensing renewal after such date.)
Any
change to the plan, or placement or design of the establishment, cruise vessel or vessel, shall be submitted in advance to the
Executive Director for determination of whether such a change constitutes a material change. If the Executive Director determines
that a material change has occurred, Commission approval is required for same.
2)
Statements reflecting the total estimated cost of construction or renovation of the establishment, vessel, or cruise vessel and
shore and dock facilities, distinguishing between known costs and projections, and separately identifying: facility design expense;
land acquisition costs; site preparation costs; construction costs or renovation costs; equipment acquisition costs; costs of
interim financing; organization, administrative and legal expenses; projected permanent financing costs; qualified infrastructure
costs; and non-qualifying infrastructure costs.
3)
A construction schedule for completion of the project, including an estimated date of project completion, indicating whether a
performance bond will be required by the applicant to be furnished by the contractor.
4)
Current financial statements, including, at a minimum, a balance sheet and profit and loss statement for the proposed licensee.
5)
A detailed statement of the sources of funds for all construction and renovation proposed by the site development plans. Any funding,
whether equity or debt, to be obtained, must be supported by firm written commitments satisfactory to the Commission. The applicant
will have 120 days in which to close all financing and start construction or the approval is deemed void.
6)
Evidence that the following agencies (if applicable) were notified of the development and/or do not oppose the site development:
U.S. Corps of Engineers, U.S. Coast Guard, Mississippi Department of Transportation, Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality,
Department of Marine Resources, Port and Harbor Commission, Levee Board, City and County government, and such other agencies as
the Executive Director deems appropriate.
The
application for a Gaming Operator’s License must be filed no later than ninety (90) days after the Commission grants approval
to proceed with development. The gaming site approval will expire three (3) years from the date approval to proceed with development
is granted unless the Commission grants an extension. Approval to proceed with development is not subject to sale, assignment
or transfer.
Opening
of a Casino
Before
any gaming facility may open to the public, all infrastructure requirements must be fully operational. The development shall be
completed in accordance with the approved plan and be ready for operation within the gaming site approval time period. Gaming
site approval may be extended within the discretion of the Commission.
Application
Information Required is Extensive and Must be Complete and Accurate
In
addition to other information required by law and Commission regulations, an applicant must provide complete information regarding
the proposed operation, including but not limited to, a certification that any establishment to be used by the proposed operation
has been inspected and approved by all appropriate authorities; fingerprints for each individual applicant; the nature, source,
and amount of any financing; the proposed uses of all available funds; the amount of funds available after opening for the actual
operation of the establishment; and economic projections for the first three years of operation of the establishment. Each applicant
must provide complete information regarding his or her background for the ten-year period preceding submission of the application.
Every
application to become a license holder must contain the following additional information: actual establishment blueprints,
including a layout of each floor stating the projected use of each area; the number of miles from the nearest population
center and a description of transportation facilities serving that population center, a description of the casino size and
configuration of slot machines, video games of chance and table games; a description of the availability of fire protection
and the adequacy of law enforcement at the establishment and emergency evacuation plans for hurricane and flooding disasters;
a description of the arrangements for food and drink concessions, the names and addresses of the concessionaires and the
terms of the concession contracts, if applicable; the type of slot machines and video games of chance to be used and the
proposed distributors and manufacturers of this equipment; a description of the physical location, size and floor plan of the
section of the establishment reserved for patrons under 21 years of age and plans for activities and staffing for this
section; periods of time that the gaming areas will be in operation; a description of the proposed management of the
facility, management personnel by function, and tip distribution policies; all known feasibility studies made available to
the applicant which have been done on the type of gaming in the particular locale where the applicant intends to conduct
gaming, and a description of procurement policies that emphasize the utilization of Mississippi employees, resources, and
goods and services in the operation of the gaming establishment.
Timetable
for Financing and Construction
License
applicants must submit, simultaneously with submission of their completed application, a timetable for financing arrangements
(including applications for approval of public offerings or private placements), and commencement and completion of construction
activities, setting forth the date upon which gaming activities will commence. The timetable will be subject to approval by the
Commission and monitored for compliance by the Executive Director. The Commission may grant extensions of time upon the recommendation
of the Executive Director. License applicants must not advertise or promote the opening of their proposed casino nor the commencement
of employee training for their proposed casino until the applicant is granted a license by the Mississippi Gaming Commission.
Applicants may request a waiver of this regulation from the Executive Director, which waiver, if granted would be subject to revocation.
Unsuitable
Locations
The
Executive Director may recommend that an application for a license be denied if the Executive Director believes that the place
or location for which the license is sought is unsuitable for the conduct of gaming operations. The Commission may deny an application
for a state gaming license if it deems that the place or location for which the license is sought is unsuitable for the conduct
of gaming operations. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following locations may be deemed unsuitable: premises
located within the immediate vicinity of residential areas, churches, schools and children’s public playgrounds; premises
where gaming is contrary to any county or city ordinance, including, but not limited to, zoning ordinances restricting the permissible
locations for gaming facilities, so long as such ordinances do not have the effect of absolutely excluding or prohibiting legal
gaming; premises which fail to meet federal, state or local health and safety standards, and any other applicable laws or regulations;
premises frequented by minors; premises lacking adequate supervision or surveillance; premises difficult to police or where adequate
fire protection may be difficult; any other premises where the conduct of gaming would be inconsistent with the public policy
of the State of Mississippi.
Building
Standards
Any
establishment to be constructed for gaming will be required to meet the Southern Standard Building Code. If the local county or
city has a building code, then the local code will be the applicable standard. The Commission requires, as a condition of licensure,
that gaming establishments meet strict hurricane emergency standards and procedures.
Objection
by County or Municipality
Whenever
the Commission receives a completed application for a gaming license proposing to operate a gaming establishment in a particular
county or municipality, the Executive Director, within ten days after receipt of the application, must notify the board of supervisors
of the county and, if applicable, the chief executive of the municipality in which the proposed operation will be located of the
receipt of the application and specify the name of the applicant and the proposed location for the gaming establishment. The county
or municipality in which the applicant proposes to operate may file a duly enacted resolution specifying any objections or endorsements
with the Executive Director.
Individual
Licensing of Shareholders of Corporate Licensee
The
Commission may request persons, affiliated entities and greater than 5% equity owners to submit an application for finding of
suitability in which event the application must be submitted within thirty days of the request.
All
Officers and Directors of a Corporation Must be Licensed
All
officers and directors of a corporation which holds or applies for a state gaming license must be licensed individually and, if
in the judgment of the Mississippi Gaming Commission the public interest will be served by requiring any or all of the corporation’s
individual stockholders, lenders, holders of evidence of indebtedness, underwriters, key executives, agents, or employees to be
licensed, the corporation shall require such persons to apply for a license. An officer or director shall apply for a license
within thirty days after he becomes an officer or director. A person required to be licensed pursuant to a decision of the commission
must apply for a license within thirty days after the executive director requests him to do so.
Licensing
is a Privilege and Revocable
It
is the declared policy of the State of Mississippi that all establishments where gambling games are conducted or operated must
be licensed and controlled so as to better protect the public health, safety, morals, good order and welfare of its inhabitants.
Any license, registration, finding of suitability, or approval by the Commission is deemed to be a revocable privilege and no
person holding such a license, registration, finding of suitability, or approval is deemed to have any vested rights therein.
An
application for a state gaming license or any other affirmative Commission action is seeking the granting of a privilege and the
burden of proving his qualification to receive any license, registration, finding of suitability or approval, is at all times
on the applicant. The applicant must document compliance with all applicable federal, state and local rules, regulations and permit
requirements. An applicant must accept any risk of adverse publicity, embarrassment, criticism, or other action, or financial
loss which may result from action with respect to an application and expressly waive any claim for damages as a result thereof.
An application for a license, finding of suitability, or registrations constitutes a request to the Executive Director for a recommendation
and to the Commission for a decision upon the applicant’s general suitability, character, integrity, and ability to participate
or engage in, or be associated with, the gaming industry in the manner or position sought by the application, or the manner or
position generally similar thereto.
Certain
Commission Considerations for Licensing
The
Commission will consider various factors when deciding whether to issue a license to conduct gaming in an establishment,
including but not limited to, the following: revenue provided by a facility to the state and local communities through direct
taxation on its operation and indirect revenues from tourism, ancillary businesses, creation of new industry and taxes on
employees and patrons. It will consider whether the proposed establishment is: economically viable and properly financed,
planned in a manner that provides for adequate security for all aspects of its operation and for people working, visiting, or
traveling to the establishment; planned in a manner which promotes efficient and safe operation; is planned in a manner that
provides efficient, safe, and enjoyable use by patrons of the establishment and parking facilities, concessions, the casino,
access to cashier windows and rest rooms; compliance with state and federal laws regarding fire, health, construction,
zoning, and other similar matters; whether the applicant will employ the persons necessary to operate the establishment in a
manner consistent with the needs, safety, and interests of persons who will be in the establishment; the population of the
area to be served by the establishment and the location of other establishments within and without the state. The Commission
will consider the character and reputation of all persons identified with ownership and operation of the establishment and
their capability to comply with rules of the Commission and the Mississippi Code; whether the proposed operation will
maximize development; whether it is beneficial to Mississippi tourism, the number and quality of employment opportunities for
Mississippians created and promoted by the proposed operation, and the amount and type of shore developments associated with
the establishment.
A
license which authorizes a holder to operate a gaming establishment is granted for no longer than three years from the date of
issue and may be granted for a period of less than three years based within the discretion of the Commission.
Gaming
Licenses
Neither
the Company nor any of its subsidiaries has a license to operate a casino in Mississippi or in any other jurisdiction. Gaming
licenses require the periodic payment of fees and taxes and are not transferable except in accordance with applicable Mississippi
law and regulations and with the prior approval of the Commission. Gaming licenses in Mississippi are issued for a maximum term
of three years and must be renewed periodically thereafter. There can be no assurance that the Company or any of its subsidiaries
will be licensed. There can be no assurance that if licensed, new licenses can be obtained at the end of any particular licensure
period. Moreover, the Commission may, at any time, and for any cause it deems reasonable, revoke, suspend, condition or limit
a license or approval to own shares of stock in a company that operates in Mississippi. The Mississippi Act also requires that
a publicly traded company register under the Act. The Company and/or its subsidiaries will be required to periodically submit
detailed financial, operating and other reports to the Commission and Mississippi State Tax Commission. A violation under a gaming
license held by a subsidiary of a Company operating in Mississippi could be deemed a violation of all other licenses, if any,
then held by the Company. Numerous transactions, including substantially all loans, leases, sales of securities and similar financing
transactions entered into by any subsidiary of the Company operating a casino in Mississippi must be reported to or approved by
the Commission. In addition, the Commission may, at its discretion, require additional information about the operations of the
Company.
Deborah
Vitale, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, though not currently licensed, previously held a gaming license
in Colorado.
Finding
of Suitability
The
following persons must apply for a finding of suitability and must be found suitable by the Commission in order to be involved
with a licensee: i) each person who serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors of any corporation, public or private, licensed
or registered by the Commission; and ii) each person who has a vote on any issue before the Board of Directors of any corporation,
public or private, licensed or registered by the Commission and who is also an employee of the corporation or any of its subsidiaries.
In addition, the following persons shall apply for a finding of suitability: i) each person who serves as Chairman of the audit
or compliance committee of any corporation, public or private, licensed or registered by the Commission, and ii) any executive,
employee, or agent of a gaming licensee that the Commission determines as having the power to exercise a significant influence
over decisions concerning any part of the operation of a gaming licensee. If the nature of the job changes from that for which
the applicant is found suitable, he may be required to submit himself to a new determination of her or his suitability.
The
Commission can require any employee to be found suitable if it finds that the public interest and policies set forth in
the Act will be served thereby. The Commission is not restricted by job titles, but will consider the functions and responsibilities
of the person, including but not limited to, persons acting in the capacity of a property level general manager, assistant general
manager, or executive level personnel actively and directly engaged in the administration or supervision of the activities of
a licensee. Any executive, employee or agent of a gaming licensee who is listed or should be listed in an annual employee report
may be required to apply for a finding of suitability.
A
finding of suitability is granted for a period of no longer than ten years from the date of issue. A finding of suitability
may be granted for a period of less than ten years within the discretion of the Commission. A holder of a finding of
suitability must file with the Investigations Division of the Commission by June 30th of each year, the “Investigations
Division Annual Report,” providing all information requested on forms provided by the Commission and any other
information requested by the Executive Director. A holder of a finding of suitability must immediately inform the Commission
of any arrest or conviction.
The
Commission has full and absolute power and authority, at any time, to deny any application or limit, condition, restrict, revoke,
or suspend any license, registration, finding of suitability or approval, or fine any person licensed, registered, found suitable
or approved, for any cause deemed reasonable by the commission. The Commission has the power, at any time, to investigate and
require the finding of suitability of any record or beneficial stockholder of the Company. The Act requires that each person who,
individually or in association with others, acquires, directly or indirectly, beneficial ownership of more than 5% of any class
of voting securities of a publicly traded corporation registered with the Mississippi Gaming Commission, must notify the Mississippi
Gaming Commission of this acquisition. The Act also requires that each person who, individually or in association with others
acquires, directly or indirectly, beneficial ownership of more than 10% of any class of voting securities of a publicly traded
corporation registered with the Commission must be found suitable by the Mississippi Gaming Commission and pay the costs and fees
that the Commission incurs in conducting the investigation. Any person who fails or refuses to apply for a finding of suitability
or a license within thirty days after being ordered to do so by the Commission may be found unsuitable. Any person found unsuitable
and who holds, directly or indirectly, any beneficial ownership of the Company’s securities beyond such time as the Commission
prescribes, may be guilty of a misdemeanor.
The
Company may be required to disclose to the Commission upon request, the identities of holders of any debt or other securities.
Under the Act, the Commission may, in its discretion, (1) require holders of debt securities of registered corporations to file
applications; (2) investigate such holders; and (3) require the holders to be found suitable to own such securities.
The
Mississippi regulations provide that a change in control of a Company may not occur without the prior approval of the Commission.
Mississippi law prohibits the Company from making a public offering of its securities without the approval of the Commission if
any part of the proceeds of the offering is to be used to finance the construction, acquisition or operation of gaming facilities
in Mississippi or to retire or extend obligations incurred for one or more such purposes. The Commission has the authority to
grant a continuous approval of securities offerings subject to renewal every three years by certain issuers.
Employees
associated with gaming in Mississippi must obtain work permits that are subject to immediate suspension under certain circumstances.
The Commission will refuse to issue a work permit to a person who has been convicted of a felony, committed certain misdemeanors
or knowingly violated the Mississippi Gaming Control Act, and it may refuse to issue a work permit to a gaming employee for any
other reasonable cause.
The
Company believes there may be persons with prior felony convictions, who are affiliated with certain shareholders, who beneficially
own in excess of 5% of a class of voting stock of the Company, who may be found unsuitable by the Mississippi Gaming Commission.
Article X of the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, as amended, provides that the “Company may repurchase or redeem
shares, at fair market value, held by any person or entity whose status as a shareholder, in the opinion of the Company’s
Board of Directors, jeopardizes the approval, continued existence, or renewal by any gaming regulatory authority, of a contract
to manage gaming operations, or any other tribal, federal or state license or franchise held by the Company or any of its subsidiaries.”
However, there can be no assurance the Company would have sufficient funds to purchase shares held by such a person or entity.
In the event the Company was unable to purchase such shares, its ability to obtain a license could be materially and adversely
affected.
License
Fees and Taxes
License
fees and taxes are payable to the State of Mississippi and to the counties and cities in which the Mississippi Gaming
Subsidiary’s respective operations will be conducted. The license fee payable to the State of Mississippi is based upon
“gaming receipts,” which are generally defined as gross receipts less payouts to customers as winnings. The fee
equals 4% of the first $50,000 or less of gross revenue per calendar month, plus 6% of the next $84,000 of gross revenue per
calendar month, plus 8% of gross revenue over $134,000 per calendar month. License fees paid in any taxable year are allowed
as a credit against the Mississippi State income tax liability of a licensee for that taxable year.
A
licensee must pay an annual license fee of $5,000. In addition, each licensee must pay a license fee based on the number of games
it operates. If it operates over 35 games, the fee is equal to $81,200 plus $100 for each game over 35 games. In addition to state
gaming license fees or taxes, a municipality or county may impose a gross revenue fee upon a licensee based on all gaming receipts
derived from the establishment equal to approximately 4%. An additional license tax may apply to gaming devices.
Beer,
Wine and Liquor Licensing
The
sale of alcoholic beverages by casinos, including beer and wine, is subject to licensing, regulation and control by both the local
jurisdiction and the Alcoholic Beverage Control Division (the “ABC”) of the Mississippi Department of Revenue. All
licenses are revocable and non-transferable. The ABC has full power to limit, condition, suspend or revoke any license, and any
disciplinary action could, and revocation would, have a material adverse impact upon the operations of an affected casino, its
financial condition and its results of operations.
Extensive
Non-Gaming Laws and Regulations
In
addition to the foregoing, the Company and/or its subsidiaries will be subject to additional federal, state, county and city,
safety, food, alcohol, health, employment, and other laws, rules, regulations and ordinances that apply to non-gaming businesses
generally. In addition, Regulations adopted by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Treasury Department require
currency transactions in excess of $10,000 occurring within a gaming day to be reported, including identification of the patron
by name and social security number. Substantial penalties can be imposed for failure to comply with these and numerous other regulations.
The foregoing is just one example of the pervasiveness of the non-gaming laws, rules, regulations and ordinances that would apply
to a casino operator.
Competition
There
is intense competition in the Mississippi market in which the Company intends to operate and in surrounding markets. The Company
will compete directly with other existing gaming facilities located in Mississippi and in bordering states, including Louisiana.
In addition, there may be additional casinos opening on the Gulf Coast of Mississippi. The Company will also be competing directly
and indirectly, with gaming facilities throughout the United States and throughout the world, as well as with Native American
gaming operations which enjoy certain tax advantages. The Company expects competition to increase as new gaming operators enter
these markets, existing competitors expand their operations, gaming activities expand in existing jurisdictions, gaming is legalized
in new jurisdictions, and legalized gaming expands on the internet. Assuming it is successful in developing a destination casino
resort, the Company will also be competing with other forms of gaming and entertainment, including but not limited to, bingo,
online gambling, pull tab games, card parlors, sports-book operations, pari-mutuel betting, dog racing, lotteries, jai-alai, video
lottery terminals, and video poker terminals.
Sports
Betting
On
August 1, 2018, Mississippi legalized single game sports betting.
The
following chart identifies casinos which are located in Mississippi and with which the Company will compete. Except for distances,
the information contained in the chart is derived from the Mississippi Gaming Commission’s Monthly Survey Information (Property
Data) for the period December 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distance to
|
|
|
|
Gaming
|
|
|
Slot
|
|
|
Table
|
|
|
Poker
|
|
|
Hotel
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Diamondhead
|
|
REGION
|
|
Sq. Ft
|
|
|
Games
|
|
|
Games
|
|
|
Games
|
|
|
Rooms
|
|
|
Parking
|
|
|
(in miles)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COASTAL REGION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beau Rivage Casino
|
|
|
84,819
|
|
|
|
1,811
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
1,740
|
|
|
|
3,320
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Boomtown Casino
|
|
|
37,891
|
|
|
|
653
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,490
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Golden Nugget
|
|
|
54,728
|
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
706
|
|
|
|
1,345
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Hard Rock Casino
|
|
|
50,984
|
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
2,332
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Harrah’s Gulf Coast
|
|
|
30,819
|
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
2,705
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
IP Casino Resort Spa
|
|
|
81,733
|
|
|
|
1,453
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
1,088
|
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Palace Casino
|
|
|
38,000
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
1,590
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Treasure Bay Casino
|
|
|
28,140
|
|
|
|
809
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
1,469
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Island View Casino
|
|
|
117,500
|
|
|
|
2,560
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
974
|
|
|
|
4,150
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Hollywood Casino
|
|
|
56,300
|
|
|
|
926
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Silver Slipper Casino
|
|
|
38,926
|
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
1,057
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Scarlet Pearl
|
|
|
60,445
|
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
2,333
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Totals
|
|
|
680,285
|
|
|
|
13,824
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
6,635
|
|
|
|
26,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NORTHERN REGION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Jackpot Casino Tunica
|
|
|
46,535
|
|
|
|
840
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,699
|
|
|
|
377
|
|
Fitzgerald’s Casino Tunica
|
|
|
38,457
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
1,795
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
Gold Strike Casino Resort
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,133
|
|
|
|
2,412
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
Hollywood Casino- Tunica
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
1,801
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
Horseshoe Casino and Hotel
|
|
|
63,000
|
|
|
|
1,021
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
6,040
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
Isle of Capri-Lula
|
|
|
56,985
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
Sam’s Town- Tunica
|
|
|
53,000
|
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
4,308
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Totals
|
|
|
362,977
|
|
|
|
6,408
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
3,959
|
|
|
|
19,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CENTRAL REGION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ameristar Casino Hotel
|
|
|
72,210
|
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
3,063
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
Harlow’s Casino Resort
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
|
733
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
Lady Luck Casino
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
Magnolia Bluffs Casino
|
|
|
16,032
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
Riverwalk Casino
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
Trop Casino Greenville
|
|
|
22,822
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
734
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
Water View Casino & Hotel
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Totals
|
|
|
224,064
|
|
|
|
4,825
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
720
|
|
|
|
8,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STATE TOTALS
|
|
|
1,267,326
|
|
|
|
25,057
|
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
11,314
|
|
|
|
54,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisiana
Competition
The
Company believes that its greatest competition will come from any existing and any new casinos that might be constructed in or
around Diamondhead, Bay St. Louis, Gulfport and Biloxi, Mississippi due to their close proximity to the Diamondhead Property.
While the Company’s primary competition will come from the foregoing, the Company’s Diamondhead, Mississippi casino
will also compete with casinos and other gaming located in the adjacent State of Louisiana. The following information is based,
in large part, on the Louisiana Gaming Control Board’s 23rd Annual Report to the Louisiana State Legislature for 2019.
Louisiana
has four land-based casinos. Inasmuch as the Company’s casino will be land-based, the Company’s primary competition
is expected to come from Harrah’s land-based casino located in downtown New Orleans. This casino is approximately one hour
from the Diamondhead site. The land-based casino in New Orleans generated $63,753,100 in gaming revenue. This represented a $3,753,100
increase from the previous fiscal year. Harrah’s employs approximately 2,400 individuals. Three of the land-based casinos in Louisiana
are Indian casinos, which are located in Marksville in central Louisiana and in Kinder and Charenton in southern Louisiana. These
are not expected to represent significant competition because of their distance from the Diamondhead site. None of the three tribes
are required to pay any fees directly to the state nor can they be required to provide the Louisiana Gaming Control Board with
any financial figures, although the Chitimacha Tribe in Charenton provides information voluntarily. All of these tribes make contributions
to the local governments in their respective locations.
There
are fifteen riverboat casinos authorized to operate in Louisiana. There are six riverboat casinos in the Shreveport-Bossier City
area, which is about 360 miles from the Diamondhead Property; three in Lake Charles, which is approximately 246 miles from the
Diamondhead Property; three in East Baton Rouge Parish, which is approximately 123 miles from the Diamondhead Property; and one
each in Kenner, Harvey and Amelia, which are approximately 73, 71, and 139 miles, respectively, from the Diamondhead Property.
These riverboat casinos employ approximately 12,900 individuals and in fiscal year 2017-2018, contributed $414,271,795 in net
revenue to Louisiana. Adjusted gross revenue increased in Lake Charles, but decreased in Baton Rouge, Shreveport/Bossier and New
Orleans.
As
of June 30, 2018, there were approximately 1,707 video poker outlets and 12,985 video poker devices in the 31 parishes in Louisiana
where video poker gaming had been approved in the local option election of November 5, 1996. These machines are authorized in
bars, restaurants, hotels, off-track betting parlors and truck stops. Franchise fees to Louisiana from video poker amounted to
$174,864,350 for fiscal year 2017-2018, an increase of $1,941,284 from the previous fiscal year.
Slot
machine gaming at racetracks in Louisiana generated $352,811,366 in adjusted gross revenue for fiscal year 2017-2018, an increase
of $8,013,838 from the previous fiscal year. After subtracting the Support Contribution Deduction of $63,753,100 for Purse Supplements,
Executive Committee of the Louisiana Thoroughbred Breeders Association, Louisiana received fees in the amount of $53,521,484.
Louisiana
generated direct gaming revenue of $706,410,728 for fiscal year 2017-2018, an increase of $4,414,467 from the previous fiscal
year. Riverboat gaming continues to be the most dominant area in gaming in Louisiana, providing more than half of the state’s
gaming revenue. The cumulative effect of the foregoing could be seen as having a significant competitive effect on the Diamondhead
Property project.
ITEM
3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
CASE
SETTLED
Edson
R. Arneault, Kathleen Devlin and James Devlin, J. Steven Emerson, Emerson Partners, J. Steven Emerson Roth IRA, Steven Rothstein,
and Barry Stark and Irene Stark v. Diamondhead Casino Corporation (In the United States District Court for the District of Delaware
(C.A. No. 1:16-cv-00989-LPS)
On
October 25, 2016, the above-named Debenture holders filed a Complaint against Diamondhead Casino Corporation (the Company) in
the United States District Court for the District of Delaware for monies due and owing pursuant to certain Collateralized Convertible
Senior Debentures issued on March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2014. The plaintiffs were seeking $1.4 million, plus interest from
January 1, 2015, together with costs and fees. The Company was served with the Complaint on October 31, 2016. On November 21,
2016, the Company filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to failure to plead diversity. On February
21, 2017, the plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to amend their complaint based upon declarations of citizenship filed with the
court. On September 26, 2017, the motion for leave to amend was granted and the Company’s motion to dismiss was granted
in part and denied in part. The Court also granted plaintiffs leave to file a Second Amended Complaint which was filed on October
2, 2017. On October 16, 2017, the Company filed Defendant’s Answer and Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaim. On November
2, 2017, the Plaintiffs filed an Answer to the Counterclaim. The parties exchanged discovery in the case. On September 27, 2018,
the Plaintiffs’ filed a motion for summary judgment. On October 18, 2018, the Company filed its opposition to the motion
for summary judgment. On November 8, 2018, the Plaintiff’s filed their reply to the Company’s opposition. On January
2, 2019, the Court canceled the trial previously scheduled for March 22, 2019. On April 2, 2019, the Court heard argument on the
Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. On June 4, 2019, the Court denied Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.
On June 14, 2019, the Plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to file a third amended complaint. On June 26, 2019, the Company filed
an opposition to the motion. On July 1, 2019, the plaintiffs filed their reply. On July 24, 2019, the Court denied the motion
for leave to amend without prejudice. On June 7, 2019, the Court scheduled a mediation conference for July 11, 2019. At the mediation
conference the parties reached a settlement.
On
December 12, 2019, the parties entered into a written Settlement Agreement. The Settlement Agreement, in addition to other terms
and conditions provides, in pertinent part, as follows: i) in the event Mississippi Gaming Corporation (“MGC”) entered
into a contract for the sale of the Diamondhead Property on or before December 31, 2019, the Plaintiffs would be paid the principal
due under the debentures and interest stated in the debentures of four percent (4%) per annum through the payment date; ii) in
the event MGC entered into a contract for the sale of the Property on or before June 30, 2020, the Plaintiffs would be paid the
principal due under the debentures, interest of four percent (4%) per annum through December 31, 2019 and, beginning January 1,
2020, interest of five percent (5%) per annum through the payment date; iii) in the event MGC has not entered into a contract
for the sale of the Property on or before June 30, 2020, but has done so on or before December 31, 2021, the Plaintiffs would
be paid the principal due under the debentures, interest of four percent (4% ) per annum through December 31, 2019 and, beginning
January 1, 2020, interest of six percent (6%) per annum through the payment date; and iv) if MGC has not entered into a contract
for the sale of the Property on or before December 31, 2021, the Plaintiffs will be entitled to a Judgment for the principal due
under the debentures, interest of four percent (4%) per annum through December 31, 2019 and, beginning January 1, 2020, interest
of six percent (6%) per annum through the date of Judgment. Following entry of Judgment, interest will accrue at the then post-judgment
rate of interest charged pursuant to the laws of the State of Delaware. There is a provision for the payment of reasonable attorneys
fees to counsel for Plaintiffs in the event MGC has not entered into a contract for the sale of the Property on or before December
31, 2019. If the parties cannot agree on the amount that constitutes reasonable attorneys fees, the parties will submit the matter
to the Court for determination, but in no event will such fees exceed $160,000 unless there is a default in the Settlement Agreement.
On January 13, 2020, the parties filed a Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice in the case. The principal and interest
pertaining to the settlement above has been accrued through December 31, 2019.
CASE
SETTLED
John
Hawley, as servicing agent for Argonaut 2000 Partners, L.P. v. Diamondhead Casino Corporation (Superior Court of the State
of Delaware)(Case No. N19C-02-239 RRC)
On
February 28, 2019, the above-named Debenture holder filed a Complaint against the Company in the Superior Court of the State of
Delaware for monies due and owing pursuant to certain Collateralized Convertible Senior Debentures issued on March 31, 2014 and
December 31, 2014. The plaintiff was seeking $100,000, plus interest from January 1, 2015, together with costs and fees. The Company
was served with the Complaint on March 8, 2019. On March 28, 2019, the Company filed its Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaim
and Affidavit of Defense. The plaintiff in this case is represented by the same law firms that represent plaintiffs in the above-referenced
case. Thus, at the mediation conference held on July 11, 2019 in the above case, the parties agreed that the same settlement agreement
reached in that case would apply to the plaintiff in this case as well. A Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice was filed in
the case on or about January 13, 2020. The principal and interest pertaining to the settlement above has been accrued
through December 31, 2019.
CASE
DECIDED
Arnold
J. Sussman, Robert Skaff and David J. Towner v. Diamondhead Casino Corporation (Superior Court of the State of Delaware) (Case
No. N18C-11-091-WCC )
On
November 9, 2018, Sussman filed suit against the Company for breach of a Promissory Note issued November 10, 2010, in the principal
amount of $50,000, with interest payable at 9% per annum, with a maturity date of November 10, 2012. Plaintiff sought payment
of principal of $50,000 and interest due from June 30, 2012 to present. On November 28, 2018, Skaff and Towner also filed suit
against the Company in the same court for breach of Promissory Notes (Case No. N18C-11-232 ALR). Skaff filed suit i) for breach
of a note issued on November 29, 2010 in the principal amount of $37,500 with interest payable at 9% per annum, with a maturity
date of November 29, 2012 and ii) for breach of a note issued on June 21, 2011, in the principal amount of $25,000 with interest
payable at 9% per annum, with a maturity date of June 21, 2013. Towner filed suit for breach of a note issued on November 29,
2010, in the principal amount of $25,000 with interest payable at 9% per annum, with a maturity date of November 29, 2012. The
cases were consolidated for hearing and trial. On February 15, 2019, the Plaintiffs filed their Consolidated Complaint. On March
7, 2019, the Company filed its Answer and Affirmative Defenses and Affidavit of Defense. On or about April 1, 2020, the Plaintiffs
filed a motion for summary judgment and a brief in support thereof. The Company filed a brief in opposition. On July 13, 2020,
the Court heard oral argument on the motion. On November 13, 2020, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.
On December 4, 2020, the Court entered a Final Order and Judgment in the case awarding judgment to Plaintiffs as follows: i) Sussman:
$88,151.46; ii) Skaff: $109,978.93; and iii) Towner: $44,127.68. Post-judgment interest was awarded in accordance with the legal
rate in Delaware (5% plus the federal discount rate). The principal and interest pertaining to the settlement above has been
accrued through December 31, 2019.