Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd. (“
Tamarack” or the
“
Company”) is pleased to announce its financial
and operating results for the three and six months ended June 30,
2017. Selected financial and operational information is set
out below and should be read in conjunction with Tamarack’s
unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and related
management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”), which are
available for review on SEDAR at www.sedar.com or on
Tamarack’s website at www.tamarackvalley.ca.
Q2 2017 Financial and Operating
Highlights
- Achieved record corporate production in Q2/17 of 19,336 boe/d,
up 9% over Q1/17 and more than doubled Q2/16, exceeding previously
announced guidance despite 1,070 boe/d being curtailed through the
second quarter due to the TransGas Coleville Gas Plant (the
“Coleville Plant”) being shut-in.
- Increasing exit production guidance to approximately 22,000
boe/d, from a range of 20,000-21,000 boe/d due to strong
operational results in the first half of 2017, which will result in
15% absolute production per share growth or 9% on a debt adjusted
per share basis.
- Oil weighting increased to 51% compared to 42% in Q2/16,
driving improved netbacks, while light oil production grew 20% over
Q1/17.
- Liquids weighting also increased to 59% in Q2/17 compared to
52% in the same period of 2016, which positively contributed to the
Company’s stronger netbacks year-over-year.
- Total funds from operations increased 119% to $33.7 million in
Q2/17 ($0.15/share basic and diluted), excluding transaction costs,
from $15.4 million in Q2/16 ($0.13/share basic and diluted), and
increased 4% compared to Q1/17 despite lower quarter-over-quarter
commodity prices.
- Invested $19.0 million in capital in Q2/17, reflecting mild
spring break-up conditions, directed to the drilling, completion,
and equipping of five (4.9 net) Viking oil wells and one (1.0 net)
Mannville gas well, the completion and equipping of five (4.3 net)
Viking oil wells and three (3.0 net) Cardium oil wells drilled in
Q1/17, and investments in longer-term projects designed to improve
operational efficiencies in Veteran.
- General and administrative (“G&A”) expenses declined 5% to
$1.74/boe in Q2/17 over Q1/17 and were 14% lower than Q2/16,
reflecting significant production growth without commensurate
increases in overhead.
- Earnings of $3.1 million ($0.01 per share basic and diluted) in
Q2/17, compared to a net loss of $10.4 million in Q2/16.
- Reduced net debt at June 30, 2017 by 8% quarter-over-quarter,
resulting in net debt to annualized Q2/17 funds from operations
falling to 1.1 times, compared to 1.3 times at the end of
Q1/17.
Financial & Operating
Results
($ thousands, except per boe) |
Three months ended |
Six months ended |
June 30, |
June 30, |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
% change |
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
% change |
($, except per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Revenue |
|
66,715 |
|
|
24,517 |
|
172 |
|
|
129,585 |
|
|
44,136 |
|
194 |
|
Funds
from operations 1 |
|
33,670 |
|
|
15,364 |
|
119 |
|
|
66,026 |
|
|
26,539 |
|
149 |
|
Per share
– basic 1 |
$ |
0.15 |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
15 |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
25 |
|
Per share
– diluted 1 |
$ |
0.15 |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
15 |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
21 |
|
Net
income (loss) |
|
3,053 |
|
|
(10,368 |
) |
129 |
|
|
5,343 |
|
|
(16,202 |
) |
133 |
|
Per share
– basic |
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
111 |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
113 |
|
Per share
– diluted |
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
111 |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
113 |
|
Net debt
2 |
|
(152,354 |
) |
|
(57,791 |
) |
164 |
|
|
(152,354 |
) |
|
(57,791 |
) |
164 |
|
Capital Expenditures 3 |
|
19,947 |
|
|
10,309 |
|
93 |
|
|
84,440 |
|
|
27,458 |
|
208 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
(thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
227,672 |
|
|
114,945 |
|
98 |
|
|
222,691 |
|
|
108,610 |
|
105 |
|
Diluted |
|
229,066 |
|
|
114,945 |
|
99 |
|
|
224,419 |
|
|
108,610 |
|
107 |
|
Share Trading (thousands, except share price) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
$ |
3.16 |
|
$ |
4.28 |
|
(26 |
) |
$ |
3.59 |
|
$ |
4.28 |
|
(16 |
) |
Low |
$ |
1.96 |
|
$ |
3.36 |
|
(42 |
) |
$ |
1.96 |
|
$ |
2.16 |
|
(9 |
) |
Trading volume |
|
55,440 |
|
|
32,394 |
|
71 |
|
|
136,308 |
|
|
61,203 |
|
123 |
|
Average daily production |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Light oil
(bbls/d) |
|
9,481 |
|
|
3,656 |
|
159 |
|
|
8,691 |
|
|
3,729 |
|
133 |
|
Heavy oil
(bbls/d) |
|
453 |
|
|
384 |
|
18 |
|
|
469 |
|
|
397 |
|
18 |
|
NGLs
(bbls/d) |
|
1,453 |
|
|
919 |
|
58 |
|
|
1,615 |
|
|
993 |
|
63 |
|
Natural
gas (mcf/d) |
|
47,696 |
|
|
27,462 |
|
74 |
|
|
46,779 |
|
|
26,640 |
|
76 |
|
Total (boe/d) |
|
19,336 |
|
|
9,536 |
|
103 |
|
|
18,572 |
|
|
9,559 |
|
94 |
|
Average sale prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Light oil
($/bbl) |
|
55.58 |
|
|
52.16 |
|
7 |
|
|
58.94 |
|
|
44.34 |
|
33 |
|
Heavy oil
($/bbl) |
|
43.80 |
|
|
37.31 |
|
17 |
|
|
44.23 |
|
|
30.09 |
|
47 |
|
NGLs
($/bbl) |
|
29.39 |
|
|
21.57 |
|
36 |
|
|
27.79 |
|
|
16.81 |
|
65 |
|
Natural
gas ($/mcf) |
|
3.01 |
|
|
1.62 |
|
86 |
|
|
2.95 |
|
|
1.82 |
|
62 |
|
Total ($/boe) |
|
37.91 |
|
|
28.25 |
|
34 |
|
|
38.55 |
|
|
25.37 |
|
52 |
|
Operating netback ($/Boe) 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
realized sales |
|
37.91 |
|
|
28.25 |
|
34 |
|
|
38.55 |
|
|
25.37 |
|
52 |
|
Royalty
expenses |
|
(3.97 |
) |
|
(1.21 |
) |
228 |
|
|
(4.05 |
) |
|
(1.63 |
) |
148 |
|
Production expenses |
|
(11.85 |
) |
|
(11.05 |
) |
7 |
|
|
(11.65 |
) |
|
(11.35 |
) |
3 |
|
Operating field netback ($/Boe) 4 |
|
22.09 |
|
|
15.99 |
|
38 |
|
|
22.85 |
|
|
12.39 |
|
84 |
|
Realized commodity hedging gain (loss) |
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
4.69 |
|
(104 |
) |
|
(0.47 |
) |
|
5.96 |
|
(108 |
) |
Operating netback |
|
21.90 |
|
|
20.68 |
|
6 |
|
|
22.38 |
|
|
18.35 |
|
22 |
|
Funds flow from operations netback ($/Boe) 4 |
|
19.14 |
|
|
17.70 |
|
8 |
|
|
19.64 |
|
|
15.25 |
|
29 |
|
Notes:
(1) Funds from operations is calculated as
cash flow from operating activities before the change in non-cash
working capital and abandonment.(2) Net debt, operating
netback, operating field netback and funds flow from operations
netback do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by
International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) and therefore
may not be comparable with the calculation of similar measures for
other entities. See “Non-IFRS Measures”.(3) Capital
expenditures include exploration and development expenditures, but
exclude corporate acquisitions.(4) Operating netback,
operating field netback and funds flow from operations netback do
not have any standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS and therefore
may not be comparable with the calculation of similar measures for
other entities. Operating field netback equals total petroleum
and natural gas sales less royalties and operating costs calculated
on a boe basis. Operating netback is the operating field netback
with realized gains and losses on commodity derivative contracts.
Funds flow from operations netback equals funds flow from
operations divided by the total sales volume and reported on a per
boe basis. Tamarack considers operating netback and funds flow from
operations netback as important measures to evaluate its
operational performance as it demonstrates its field level
profitability relative to current commodity prices.
Operations Update
The second quarter of 2017 represents the first
complete quarter with full integration of the assets acquired
through the business combination with Spur Resources Ltd. (the
“Viking Acquisition”), and clearly demonstrates the strength of
Tamarack’s strategy. Despite production curtailments and
challenges resulting from the unexpected Coleville Plant shut-down
that continued through the quarter, Tamarack posted record Q2
production volumes that were 9% higher than the previous quarter
and more than double the same period in 2016. Production
averaged 19,336 boe/d (59% liquids), an increase of 9%
quarter-over-quarter and 103% year-over-year, with a meaningful
increase in Q2/17 oil weighting to 51% compared to 42% in Q2/16 and
47% in Q1/17. Volume additions in Q2/17 reflect a full
quarter of production related to the Q1/17 drilling program which
contributed 2,361 boe/d from Wilson Creek / Alder Flats (68% oil
and natural gas liquids), 2,044 boe/d from the Viking development
program (72% oil and natural gas liquids) and 394 boe/d from the
heavy oil development program. The production additions were
partially offset by lost production due to the unexpected shut-in
of the Coleville Plant of 1,070 boe/d and expected declines from
legacy Tamarack volumes. Tamarack’s previous Q2/17 guidance
of 18,000 to 18,500 boe/d factored in the Coleville Plant shut-down
but due to continued strong operational results, the Company
exceeded guidance by 5-7%.
In response to mild spring break up conditions,
the Company accelerated its second half development program in
June. This included the drilling of five (4.9 net) Viking oil
wells at Veteran as well as one (1.0 net) Mannville gas well.
During the quarter, the Company also provided for investment in
projects designed to improve operational efficiencies near-term and
future development opportunities that offer longer-term
impact. These projects include the completion of a water
disposal well and expansion of the oil battery in Veteran;
completion of additional tuck-in land acquisitions in Tamarack’s
core areas in order to supplement the existing land base and expand
the inventory of future potential drilling locations; and the
purchase of seismic in one of Tamarack’s core areas which is
expected to enhance the Company’s knowledge of area geology and
support further development of similar assets where Tamarack
controls the infrastructure.
Positive drilling results at Veteran during the
first quarter exceeded the Company’s expectations and drove the
decision to accelerate the Veteran oil facility expansion to over
10,000 bbls/d of emulsion treating capacity (5,000 bbls/d oil
capacity) and implement additional water handling capabilities
which will eliminate water trucking and disposal costs. As a
result of these initiatives, Tamarack expects that corporate
production expenses will be $0.40-0.50/boe lower by the end of 2017
compared to the average per unit production expense during the
first half of 2017.
The first quarter Veteran drilling program has
continued to outperform expectations. The majority of Veteran
wells that were drilled in Q1/17 were fitted with pumping equipment
sized to handle expected volumes based on area type curves, but the
wells outperformed the Company’s expected type curves by up to 25%.
During the second quarter, Tamarack tested the impact of increasing
the size of pumping equipment on four wells. This eliminated rate
restrictions experienced previously, which were caused by
limitations on pump capacity. The upgraded pumps are expected
to improve 120-day average production rates by an average of 10-20
bbls/d while enhancing single well economics. Given this
improvement, Tamarack intends to install larger pumping equipment
on all wells drilled in the second half of 2017. In addition,
the Company has increased its type curve for the Veteran area and
as a result of shallower decline rates on wells drilled during the
first quarter, also expects average reserves per well to increase,
although it is too early to estimate the extent of the
impact.
At Wilson Creek, Tamarack drilled two 2-mile
horizontal wells during the first quarter of 2017, testing varying
frac densities and number of stages, with the results exceeding
internal expectations. The first 2-mile horizontal well
drilled in Wilson Creek, at 13-3-45-6 W5M, was completed with 85
stages using 15-tonnes per stage. During its first 115 days
on production, this well produced 334 bbls/d of oil (402 boe/d) and
is expected to payout in less than eight months based on strip
prices. Comparatively, the second well at Wilson Creek,
12-3-45-6 W5M, was completed with 115 stages using 15-tonnes per
stage and demonstrated an average 393 bbls/d of oil (445 boe/d)
during its first 115 days on production and is expected to also
payout in less than eight months.
Based on these positive results and the
anticipated associated cost efficiencies, Tamarack plans to
increase frac density and move to a higher tonnage per stage for
future 2-mile well completions relative to levels that were
deployed through 2016. The total on-stream cost of the
85-stage well was $3.44 million and was $3.84 million for the
115-stage well. Early results indicate that increasing frac density
and tonnage will generate incremental production volumes, improve
paybacks and net present values. Based on the first 115 days
of production, the Company realized a 36% improvement in capital
efficiencies on these higher frac density wells compared to the
previous 2-mile wells drilled in 2016. During the third
quarter, the Company intends to drill additional 2-mile wells in
the area testing an even tighter frac density and higher tonnage
per stage than what was used in 2016. The next 2-mile well at
Wilson Creek 8-29-44-5 W5M has been drilled, and by mid-August,
will be completed with 117 stages using 20-tonnes per
stage.
The Company is currently running four active
drilling rigs, two in Wilson Creek and two in Veteran, and expects
to invest $80-90 million in capital through the balance of
2017. In the second half of the year, Tamarack plans to drill
seven 2-mile Cardium wells at Wilson Creek (including the 2-mile
8-29 well above) as well as two 1.5-mile wells; 35-40 Viking wells
at Veteran; up to six wells at Milton; two wells at Penny; one to
three wells at Redwater; and one Mannville natural gas
well.
Outlook
Tamarack’s priority is to maintain financial
flexibility which will position the Company for organic per share
growth, and allow Tamarack to capitalize on attractive
opportunities to enhance its asset base which may arise in a weaker
and more volatile commodity price environment. With strong
drilling results achieved thus far in 2017, the Company believes
its robust drilling inventory supports a multi-year, per share
growth strategy and positions Tamarack for further success.
The Company has continued to reduce its net debt, which was 8%
lower at the end of Q2/17 versus Q1/17, while improving its net
debt to quarter annualized funds flow ratio which declined to 1.1
times at June 30, 2017 compared to 1.3 times at March 31,
2017. By the end of 2017, at current strip prices Tamarack
anticipates net debt to fourth quarter annualized funds flow
(including hedges) to be below 1.0 times, with between $95 to $105
million of available liquidity estimated on its credit
facilities. The Company has also continued to seek downside
risk mitigation and support its strong balance sheet by layering in
additional hedges, resulting in approximately 28-30% of forecast
second half 2017 oil production hedged at $70.36/bbl Canadian and
57-60% of natural gas hedged at $2.78/GJ AECO. Tamarack also has
approximately 50% of its first quarter 2018 natural gas production
hedged at $3.16/GJ AECO. All of these steps are important
factors in providing shareholders with strong debt-adjusted returns
amidst an uncertain commodity price environment.
On July 16, 2017, the Coleville Plant
recommenced partial operations, with full-scale operations expected
later in the year. Tamarack continues to have production of
approximately 2.0 MMcf/d and 30 bbls/d of NGLs curtailed, but the
Company’s strong drilling results to date have enabled Tamarack to
meet and exceed guidance despite this restriction. Since the
resumption of the Coleville Plant’s partial operations, Tamarack’s
production based on field estimates has averaged approximately
20,000 boe/d (56% liquids weighting), setting the stage to meet or
exceed the Company’s full year 2017 production average guidance of
19,000 to 20,000 boe/d. In addition, based on the strength of
the first half 2017 drilling results, Tamarack has increased its
exit production guidance to approximately 22,000 boe/d (57-62% oil
and NGLs), up from 20,000 to 21,000 boe/d. By exiting 2017 at
22,000 boe/d, Tamarack will have achieved absolute production per
share growth of over 15% and debt-adjusted production per share
growth of approximately 9% compared to Q4/16.
About Tamarack Valley Energy
Ltd.
Tamarack is an oil and gas exploration and
production company committed to long-term growth and the
identification, evaluation and operation of resource plays in the
Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin. Tamarack’s strategic direction
is focused on two key principles – targeting repeatable and
relatively predictable plays that provide long-life reserves, and
using a rigorous, proven modeling process to carefully manage risk
and identify opportunities. The Company has an extensive inventory
of low-risk, oil development drilling locations focused primarily
in the Cardium and Viking fairways in Alberta that are economic
over a range of oil and natural gas prices. With this type of
portfolio and an experienced and committed management team,
Tamarack intends to continue delivering on its strategy to maximize
shareholder returns while managing its balance sheet.
Abbreviations
bbls |
barrels |
bbls/d |
barrels per day |
boe |
barrels of oil equivalent |
boe/d |
barrels of oil equivalent per day |
mcf |
thousand cubic feet |
MMcf |
million cubic feet |
mcf/d |
thousand cubic feet per day |
MMcf/d |
million cubic feet per day |
NGLs |
natural gas liquids |
Unit Cost Calculation
For the purpose of calculating unit costs,
natural gas volumes have been converted to a boe using six thousand
cubic feet equal to one barrel unless otherwise stated. A boe
conversion ratio of 6:1 is based upon an energy equivalency
conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does
not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead. This conversion
conforms to National Instrument 51‑101 – Standards of Disclosure
for Oil and Gas Activities. Boe may be misleading, particularly if
used in isolation.
Forward Looking Information
This press release contains certain
forward-looking information (collectively referred to herein as
“forward-looking statements”) within the meaning of applicable
Canadian securities laws. Forward-looking statements are
often, but not always, identified by the use of words such as
“anticipate”, “target”, “plan”, “continue”, “intend”, “consider”,
“design”, “estimate”, “expect”, “may”, “will”, “should”, “could”,
“believe” or similar words suggesting future outcomes. More
particularly, this press release contains statements concerning:
Tamarack’s business strategy, objectives, strength and focus; an
increase in capital and operating efficiencies and netbacks; the
ability of the Company to achieve drilling success consistent with
management’s expectations; drilling plans including increases to
frac density and intensity, and timing of drilling; the timeframe
for resumption of full operations at the Coleville Plant; the
completion of the water disposal well and expansion of the oil
battery in Veteran; tuck-in land acquisitions in Tamarack’s core
areas; the purchase of seismic in one of Tamarack’s core areas;
expected levels of operating costs, G&A costs, costs of
services and other costs and expenses; cost cutting initiatives;
the payout of wells and the timing thereof; oil and natural gas
production levels including changes resulting from upgraded pumps;
adjustments to the 2017 capital expenditure program and expected
production in the second half of 2017; and shareholder returns.
The forward-looking statements contained in this
document are based on certain key expectations and assumptions made
by Tamarack, including relating to: prevailing commodity prices and
the actual prices received for the Company’s products; the
availability and performance of drilling rigs, facilities,
pipelines and other oilfield services; the timing of past
operations and activities in the planned areas of focus; the
drilling, completion and tie-in of wells being completed as
planned; the performance of new and existing wells; the application
of existing drilling and fracturing techniques; prevailing weather
and break-up conditions; royalty regimes and exchange rates; the
application of regulatory and licensing requirements; the continued
availability of capital and skilled personnel; the ability to
maintain or grow the banking facilities; and the accuracy of
Tamarack’s geological interpretation of its drilling and land
opportunities, including the ability of seismic activity to enhance
such interpretation.
Although management considers these assumptions
to be reasonable based on information currently available, undue
reliance should not be placed on the forward-looking statements
because Tamarack can give no assurances that they may prove to be
correct. By their very nature, forward-looking statements are
subject to certain risks and uncertainties (both general and
specific) that could cause actual events or outcomes to differ
materially from those anticipated or implied by such
forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include,
but are not limited to: risks associated with the oil and gas
industry in general (e.g. operational risks in development,
exploration and production; and delays or changes in plans with
respect to exploration or development projects or capital
expenditures); commodity prices; the uncertainty of estimates and
projections relating to production, cash generation, costs and
expenses; health, safety, litigation and environmental risks; and
access to capital. Due to the nature of the oil and natural gas
industry, drilling plans and operational activities may be delayed
or modified to react to market conditions, results of past
operations, regulatory approvals or availability of services
causing results to be delayed. Please refer to Tamarack’s Annual
Information Form (the “AIF”) for additional risk factors relating
to Tamarack. The AIF can be accessed either on Tamarack’s website
at www.tamarackvalley.ca or under the Company’s profile on
www.sedar.com.
The forward-looking statements contained in this
press release are made as of the date hereof and the Company does
not undertake any obligation to update publicly or to revise any of
the included forward-looking statements, except as required by
applicable law. The forward-looking statements contained herein are
expressly qualified by this cautionary statement.
Non-IFRS Measures
Certain financial measures referred to in this
press release, such as net debt, operating netback, operating field
netback and funds flow from operations netback are not prescribed
by IFRS. The Company uses these measures to help evaluate its
performance. These non-IFRS financial measures do not have any
standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS and therefore may not be
comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. The
Company uses net debt as an alternative measure of outstanding
debt. Net debt includes accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and
deposits, bank debt and accounts payable and accrued liabilities,
but excludes the fair value of financial
instruments. Operating field netback equals total petroleum
and natural gas sales less royalties and operating costs calculated
on a boe basis. Operating netback is the operating field netback
with realized gains and losses on commodity derivative contracts.
Funds flow from operations netback equals funds flow from
operations divided by the total sales volume and reported on a per
boe basis. Tamarack considers operating netback and funds flow from
operations netback as important measures to evaluate its
operational performance as they demonstrate the Company’s field
level profitability relative to current commodity prices.
Please refer to the MD&A for additional information relating to
non-IFRS measures. The MD&A can be accessed either on
Tamarack’s website at www.tamarackvalley.ca or under the
Company’s profile on www.sedar.com.
For additional information, please contact:
Brian Schmidt
President & CEO
Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd.
Phone: 403.263.4440
www.tamarackvalley.ca
Ron Hozjan
VP Finance & CFO
Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd.
Phone: 403.263.4440
Tamarack Valley Energy (TSX:TVE)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Nov 2024 bis Dez 2024
Tamarack Valley Energy (TSX:TVE)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Dez 2023 bis Dez 2024