First Majestic Responds to Inaccurate Media Reports and Provides Update on Tax Dispute with the Government of Mexico
10 März 2021 - 1:00PM
FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER CORP. (AG: NYSE; FR: TSX)
(the "Company" or “First Majestic”) today responds to the several
inaccurate and misleading Mexican media articles that have been
recently published regarding the ongoing tax dispute with the
Government of Mexico.
In order to be transparent regarding the facts
surrounding the Company’s decision to file a NAFTA Request for
Arbitration and for the benefit of those loyal and interested
shareholders and stakeholders, the Company wishes to provide an
update and a status summary of the tax dispute:
- First Majestic
is a Canadian public company that pays its taxes in accordance with
domestic legislation in Canada and Mexico and to the Company’s
knowledge is up to date in all its tax payments.
- First Majestic
acquired Primero Empresa Minera, S.A. de C.V. (“PEM”), the owner of
the San Dimas Silver/Gold Mine in May 2018, via the acquisition of
Primero Mining Corp. (“Primero”). Mr. Keith Neumeyer, President and
CEO of First Majestic Silver, was not the CEO of PEM prior to its
purchase in May 2018.
- In 2010 and
under prior ownership, PEM acquired the San Dimas mine and assumed
all obligations under a pre-existing streaming agreement with
Wheaton Precious Metals (“WPM”) dating back to 2004, whereby PEM
was required to sell most of the silver production from the San
Dimas mine to WPM at US$4.00 per ounce.
- To provide
certainty of tax treatment for sales under the streaming agreement,
PEM entered into an Advance Pricing Agreement (“APA”), with the
Mexican government in October 2012 and obtained a ruling from the
Mexican tax authorities confirming the APA for the years of 2010 to
2014. The APA confirmed that taxes payable by PEM under the
streaming agreement would be calculated on the basis of the actual
realized revenue and not on the basis of market prices.
- During the years in question, 2010 to 2014, taxable income for
PEM was as follows:
Tax year |
Taxable income (loss) MXP |
FX Rate |
Taxable income (loss) USD |
2010 |
(127,062,692 |
) |
12.64 |
(10,055,071 |
) |
2011 |
(509,666,527 |
) |
12.43 |
(41,011,871 |
) |
2012 |
105,377,951 |
|
13.17 |
8,002,255 |
|
2013 |
53,214,284 |
|
12.77 |
4,167,960 |
|
2014 |
606,694,840 |
|
13.30 |
45,622,018 |
|
Total |
128,557,856 |
|
|
6,725,292 |
|
Over the period in
question PEM had a combined net earnings before taxes of
approximately US$6.7 million. According to the Company’s
constitutional law advisors, under Mexican law, taxes may not be
imposed on income not received.
- Contrary to the
terms of the APA, which the Company has been advised remains valid
in accordance with the Mexican Federal Tax Code unless and until it
is nullified with finality by the Mexican Supreme Court, the
Mexican government has issued tax assessments for PEM for the years
2010, 2011 and 2012 calculated on the basis of market prices and
not the actual realized price. The total amount of these
reassessments is approximately US$260 million of which
approximately US$75 million is additional taxes. The balance of
these reassessments constitutes penalties, interest and denied
intercompany interest expenses.
- Streaming
agreements like PEM’s agreement with WPM are legally valid in
Canada and Mexico and conform to international guidelines. At the
present time, there are approximately seven active precious metal
streaming agreements in Mexico’s mining sector. It is unknown why
SAT has singled out the PEM streaming agreement.
- In May 2018,
First Majestic negotiated with WPM to cancel the original streaming
agreement by paying WPM US$151 million and entered into a new
stream agreement on revised terms which simplified the financing
structure, and initiated the payment of taxes on spot pricing of
silver and gold. First Majestic and WPM are completely independent
public companies that deal at arm’s length for the interests of
their respective stakeholders/shareholders.
- Several
unsuccessful attempts have been made by First Majestic to engage
with the Mexican government authorities within the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Economy, Ministry of Finance and
Servicio de Administración Tributaria (“SAT”).
- In order to
defend its rights, the Company is working with several advisors,
and continues to receive the diplomatic support and assistance of
the Canadian Embassy in Mexico.
- The Mexican
government has disregarded its obligations under several
international treaties, Mutual Agreement Procedures, and double
taxation treaties between Canada and Mexico, and OECD
(“Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development”) transfer
pricing rules.
- Therefore,
without indications from the Mexican government that a mediated
resolution would be possible, and as announced last week, the
Company decided on March 1st to file a NAFTA Request for
Arbitration through the World Bank’s International Centre for
Settlement of Investment Disputes in order to formally request to
bring the Mexican government to the table for an unbiased
arbitration.
As a further update to shareholders, and as
expected, PEM recently received a notice of reassessment for the
fiscal year 2013 from the SAT for the Mexican Peso amount of
MXP1,866,655,000 (approximately US$132.1 million based on current
foreign currency conversion rates) recalculating PEM’s taxable
income on the basis of market prices for silver sold under the
Streaming Agreement rather than actual revenue received. The
components of the tax reassessment presented in US Currency can be
summarized as follows:
Description of Reason for Assessment and
Impact |
US$ (Millions) |
Revenue adjustment
related to silver pricing disagreement regarding APA |
|
18.0 |
Adjustment related
to denied interest expense |
|
14.3 |
Adjustment related
to management fees |
|
0.4 |
Double counting of
taxes |
|
|
|
17.3 |
Penalties,
interest, inflation and withholdings |
|
82.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
132.1 |
The reassessment far exceeds PEM’s reported
annual audited net income before taxes of US$4.2 million for the
2013 fiscal year in question. The majority of the tax assessment
relates to inflationary adjustments and punitive discretionary
penalties, interest, and surcharges, once again far exceeding the
income of PEM.
In accordance with the aforementioned advice by
the Company’s Mexican counsel, (i) no tax is payable under these
reassessments while the Company’s appeals before the Mexican courts
are in process and, ii) the Company believes that its interest
expenses and management fee deductions comply with applicable OECD
transfer pricing principles.
The Company will continue to vigorously
challenge all tax reassessments through all domestic and
international means available to it.
ABOUT THE COMPANY
First Majestic is a publicly traded mining
company focused on silver production in Mexico and is aggressively
pursuing the development of its existing mineral property assets.
The Company presently owns and operates the San Dimas Silver/Gold
Mine, the Santa Elena Silver/Gold Mine and the La Encantada Silver
Mine. Production from these mines are projected to be between 12.5
to 13.9 million silver ounces or 20.6 to 22.9 million silver
equivalent ounces in 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION contact
info@firstmajestic.com, visit our website at www.firstmajestic.com
or call our toll-free number 1.866.529.2807.
FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER CORP.
“signed”
Keith Neumeyer, President & CEO
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking
Statements
This press release contains “forward‐looking
information” and "forward-looking statements” under applicable
Canadian and U.S. securities laws (collectively, “forward‐looking
statements”). These statements relate to future events or the
Company's future performance, business prospects or opportunities
that are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts
not yet determinable and assumptions of management made in light of
management's experience and perception of historical trends,
current conditions and expected future developments.
Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to,
statements with respect to: the timing and amount of estimated
future production; arbitration and litigation proceedings and the
outcome thereof; and the validity of the Advance Pricing
Agreement. Assumptions may prove to be incorrect and actual
results may differ materially from those anticipated. Consequently,
guidance cannot be guaranteed. As such, investors are cautioned not
to place undue reliance upon guidance and forward-looking
statements as there can be no assurance that the plans, assumptions
or expectations upon which they are placed will occur. All
statements other than statements of historical fact may be
forward‐looking statements. Any statements that express or involve
discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs,
plans, projections, objectives or future events or performance
(often, but not always, using words or phrases such as “seek”,
“anticipate”, “plan”, “continue”, “estimate”, “expect”, “may”,
“will”, “project”, “predict”, “forecast”, “potential”, “target”,
“intend”, “could”, “might”, “should”, “believe” and similar
expressions) are not statements of historical fact and may be
“forward‐looking statements”.
Actual results may vary from forward-looking
statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause
actual results to materially differ from those expressed or implied
by such forward-looking statements, including but not limited to:
the duration and effects of the coronavirus and COVID-19, and any
other pandemics or public health crises on our operations and
workforce, and the effects on global economies and society, actual
results of exploration activities; conclusions of economic
evaluations; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be
refined; commodity prices; variations in ore reserves, grade or
recovery rates; actual performance of plant, equipment or processes
relative to specifications and expectations; accidents;
fluctuations in costs; labour relations; availability and
performance of contractors; relations with local communities;
changes in national or local governments; changes in applicable
legislation or application thereof; delays in obtaining approvals
or financing or in the completion of development or construction
activities; exchange rate fluctuations; requirements for additional
capital; government regulation; environmental risks; reclamation
expenses; outcomes of pending litigation including appeals of
judgments; responses to and resolutions of claims and arbitration
proceedings; negotiations and regulatory proceedings; the potential
refusal of the Government of Mexico to engage in good faith
arbitration; availability of arbitral panels and courts;
limitations on insurance coverage as well as those factors
discussed in the section entitled "Description of the Business -
Risk Factors" in the Company's most recent Annual Information Form,
available on www.sedar.com, and Form 40-F on file with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, D.C.
Although First Majestic has attempted to identify important
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from
those contained in forward-looking statements, there may be other
factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or
intended.
The Company believes that the expectations
reflected in these forward‐looking statements are reasonable, but
no assurance can be given that these expectations will prove to be
correct and such forward‐looking statements included herein should
not be unduly relied upon. These statements speak only as of the
date hereof. The Company does not intend, and does not assume any
obligation, to update these forward-looking statements, except as
required by applicable laws.
First Majestic Silver (TSX:FR)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Okt 2024 bis Nov 2024
First Majestic Silver (TSX:FR)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Nov 2023 bis Nov 2024