Filed by D-Wave Quantum Inc.
Pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act of 1933
and deemed filed pursuant to Rule 14a-12
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Form S-4 File No. 333-263573
Subject Company: DPCM Capital, Inc.
(Commission File No. 001-39638)
The Six Five Summit The Commercialization of Quantum: How Annealing Quantum Computing Drives Business Value,
Today 6/8/2022
|
|
|
Daniel Newman: |
|
Alan Baratz, CEO, D-Wave. Welcome to this years Six Five Summit. |
|
|
Alan Baratz: |
|
Thanks Daniel. |
|
|
Daniel Newman: |
|
Yeah. |
|
|
Alan Baratz: |
|
Its a pleasure to be here and to have the opportunity to spend some time speaking with you. |
|
|
Daniel Newman: |
|
Yeah, we were thrilled to have you involved. We knew this year was the year that we needed to get quantum front and center over the last couple of years at the summit. Weve had some odd and end conversations about quantum, but
as weve seen hyperscalers major OEMs, startups, new IPOs in the quantum space over the last few years and a whole bunch of applications come to the surface. We knew it was the right time to really get the leaders, the companies that have been
at it, the companies that are joining the fray to come along and talk to us. So, D-Wave a company that has been at it for some time and been doing a lot in this space. It was really exciting to get you here.
And, I want, Im going to start with a bigger question for you, but before I do that, only because, quantum companies still arent necessarily household names to people unless they happen to be a very small business unit within a mega tech
company, give me just the quick elevator and introduce D-Wave. |
|
|
Alan Baratz: |
|
Sure. Happy to do it. And by the way, Im really pleased to see that you all are now fully embracing quantum. So D-Wave actually began about 15 years ago. We were the first company in the
world to pursue the development and delivery of a quantum computer. And in fact, we have just recently, about a year ago, delivered our fifth generation quantum computer over 5,000 qubits, the most powerful quantum computer in the world. Its
accessible through our quantum cloud service called Leap. And we provide a complete set of open source software development tools for building applications to run on our cloud service. And finally, D-Wave is
the first and actually only commercial quantum commercial computing company. We have over two dozen global 2000 customers, working on real business applications to benefit their business operations. |
|
|
|
Daniel Newman: |
|
Well, first of all, congratulations. Second of all, I bet you theres some people out there that are like, wow, 15 years. It was kind of like when I talked to, I still remember talking to an executive and I didnt ask
permission, so I wont name his name, but when I found out hed gotten a PhD in AI in the 1980s, and I just remember thinking to myself, what, like that it, that people were studying this and movies like 2001 in a space. I mean, this stuff
seemed so far out there. |
|
|
|
|
Although, whether its that movie or 1984, the world is definitely coming for us, it feels like, isnt it? Lets start with the macro, you mentioned youve got commercial customers, you have business, youve
been at this for a while, but quantum still seems newer to a lot of people. It still seems like an emerging technology. What is that current state as you describe it and kind of how is it delivering value to these customers you mentioned. |
|
|
Alan Baratz: |
|
Yeah, so first of all, the market opportunity for quantum is huge. For example, Boston Consulting Group puts it at two to five billion in the near term growing to 450 to 850 billion in roughly the 20 year timeframe. Moreover,
the market is ready for quantum. 452 Research a couple of years ago, did a survey. They surveyed about 1000 Fortune 5,000 companies. They found that almost 40% of them had quantum use cases that they were working on at that point in time a couple of
years ago. And Iperion just did a similar survey and they found that its now over 60% of the companies surveyed that have quantum use cases that they are working on. So the market is huge. The market is real, today. Now, in order to kind of
get your arms around the extent to which there are actually customers out there benefiting from quantum, we need to spend a minute talking about the approaches to quantum because there are two primary approaches to quantum computing. |
|
|
|
|
Theres whats called annealing, quantum computing and whats called gate model quantum computing. At D-Wave we started with annealing and we did that because frankly, annealing
is an easier technology to work with. Its easier to scale. Its less sensitive to errors and its really good at solving optimization problems. Things like employee scheduling or autonomous vehicle routing or packing containers onto
ships or rail cars. Frankly, most of the important hard problems that businesses need to solve, annealing is very good at solving. And by selecting annealing, we have been able to iterate over the course of the last, roughly 10 years to get to the
point where we have quantum computers that today are commercial and solving that class of problems. Now, |
|
|
Daniel Newman: |
|
No, I want, I want to stop you real quick. Can I, cause I think I want to interject. This is a little from a technical standpoint, I always say, well, theres certain things that people dont really understand, quantum is
one of those things. How do you quickly give kind of a, demark between the gate and annealing because you know, I love to kind of hear how you explain that, cause Im sure thats a question you get in many presentations. |
|
|
Alan Baratz: |
|
Yep. So first of all, only D-Wave chose to pursue annealing. And so were the only company in the world that has this technology. And, and as a result, frankly, the only company in the
world thats able to be commercial today. The difference between the two is that annealing quantum computers inherently solve only one problem. That problem is finding the lowest point in a multidimensional landscape. But whats
interesting about that is that many problems, in fact, all optimization problems, the problems that I mentioned previously can be recast as that type of problem. And thats why annealing quantum computers are so good at solving that class of
problem. Theyre just native optimization engines. Gate model systems, you have to program them with the algorithm required to solve a particular problem. So you know theyre programmed more like traditional classical computers. |
|
|
|
|
|
However, what we have recently learned, new news just within the last eight months or so, is that while annealing quantum computers are native optimization engines and really good at solving optimization problems, gate model systems
are not good at solving optimization problems. Its unlikely they will ever be able to deliver a speed up on that class of problems. What that means is that we now have a bifurcation in the market. Certain applications require annealing and
other applications require gate model. And so annealing will always be critically important for the class of applications that its good at. And gate model will be important for the class of applications that its good at. |
|
|
Daniel Newman: |
|
Yeah. That was a great explanation. I think people appreciate that because I think for the very reason you mentioned that you were sort of the lone pursuant. Now I know theres a little off course, but I just got to ask you
sometimes when you go alone, you go alone, because youre on your way to the top. And sometimes when you go alone, people will say you went alone, because you picked the wrong path. I get the optimization thing, but why havent others
followed suit just for the pure reason of being able to commercialize faster. |
|
|
Alan Baratz: |
|
Yeah, exactly. So good, excellent question. It has to do with history. So when we started in the quantum space 10 years ago, nobody really believed you could build a gate model system, but it was believed that you could build an
annealing system. So since we were the only ones trying to build a quantum computer back then we selected annealing because there was a pretty good sense that you could build such a beast. And we went ahead and did it about five years ago when
everybody else decided to get into the quantum space. So were, we are the leaders, theyre the laggards, when everybody else decided to get into the quantum space, it was believed at that point that you could build a gate model system,
the science and the engineering had evolved to the point where it was believed that you could. |
|
|
|
|
And at that point it was also believed that a gate model system could solve any quantum problem. So at that point we knew annealing was good at certain classes of problems like optimization, but could not solve all quantum problems.
Five years ago, it was believed that gate model could solve all quantum problems. So everybody that jumped in five years ago said, well, we might as well build gate because it can do everything. If we do annealing., it can just do some problems like
optimization. What we learned middle of last year, and this was a big, important result, very important for D-Wave, was that gate model cannot solve all quantum problems. |
|
|
|
|
They cannot deliver speed ups on optimization problems. And so now we see that bifurcation in the market. And so its kind of like everybody else kind of missed the boat a little bit. |
|
|
Daniel Newman: |
|
So when you talk optimization, give me an example, lets get, lets get practical here. What are, what are some of the problems that youre able to solve right now that goes by the way that have fully committed to the
gate model are going to either have to be rethinking or somehow pairing more significantly with classical computing, right? I mean, thats going to be the two routes. |
|
|
Alan Baratz: |
|
Yeah. So look, dont get me wrong. There are very important classes of problems that gate model systems can solve that annealing cannot. For example, quantum chemistry or computational fluid dynamics. Those are more the domain
of gate model systems, but for annealing and optimization things like employee scheduling. So we had a retail company that came to us in the height of the pandemic and they found that the additional constraints and |
|
|
|
|
|
requirements being placed on them by the pandemic, really complicated the scheduling of their employees. And what they found was that it was taking them up to 25 hours per location, per week, to schedule their employees. Using our
quantum computer, theyre now able to schedule their employees in less than two minutes, per location, per week. So a very significant improvement. Let me give you another example: portfolio optimization. A bank in Europe working with a partner
of ours called Multiverse, wanted to determine the optimal portfolio subject to a given risk profile. |
|
|
|
|
So for a given risk profile, whats the maximum return you can get on a portfolio. They had several different portfolios, small to large, and they were using several different systems to compute the solution. What they found
was that on the largest portfolio, only two systems could compute the solution. Tensor networks from Google, which is classical, and it took up to 32 hours to compute the solution. Our quantum computer took less than three minutes to compute the
solution. So are just two examples of important real world problems where the quantum system is delivering business value today. And there are many other examples. |
|
|
Daniel Newman: |
|
Thats great. And Im sure theres a lot of people, at least, at the time of filming that wish they had a three minute portfolio optimization tool. Based upon whats been going on in the, in the markets the last
couple of months. |
|
|
Alan Baratz: |
|
But its interesting. |
|
|
Daniel Newman: |
|
Its a, its a very pragmatic thing though that I think people can relate to because that is one of the big deltas. And that is also by the way, one of the reasons that I think classical and quantum are going to end up
being symbiotic in many ways is that there are certain problems that one is great at doing and theres certain problems the other is great at doing. And that in very few cases, are they both, competing to be great at something, but in more
cases its A plus B equals C or even one plus one equals three. |
|
|
Alan Baratz: |
|
Yeah, thats exactly right. In fact, even today we do use hybrid quantum classical computing. So our, our Leap quantum cloud service provides not only direct access to our quantum system, but also access to hybrid solvers that
are combining classical with quantum. And so, depending on the specific application, youll either run natively quantum or through one of the hybrid solvers. |
|
|
Daniel Newman: |
|
Yeah, thats great. Thats exactly the kind of example Im hoping that people are paying attention to. Its classical, and quantum, and together theyre doing things faster and very meaningful things that
are going to be practical and addressable by everybody in the market at some time in the near future things like drug |
|
|
Alan Baratz: |
|
Well and in, and in many cases right now, today, |
|
|
Daniel Newman: |
|
Thats what I mean right now and in the near future. But Im saying like things like the ability to, more rapidly discovered drug compounds, if anything we learned in the, during the COVID era |
|
|
|
|
|
was, we have a need to be able to speed up and expedite the process of identifying medications that could solve new and complex diseases that we arent even aware exist right now. And of course, |
|
|
Alan Baratz: |
|
One of our customers has used our system to develop new peptides that are being used today in clinical trials for COVID therapeutics. So youre absolutely right. |
|
|
Daniel Newman: |
|
I like that. Say that again? No, Im just kidding. I got it. All right, well, lets wrap up here. What Id love to kind of talk about is youve talked about where were at now. Weve talked a little bit
about where things are heading, but you as one of the earliest and one of the first, if not the first to commercialize quantum, talk about what you expect the next few years to look like in this space. |
|
|
Alan Baratz: |
|
Yeah. So, so yes, THE first to commercialize quantum. So first of all, there are two classes of applications. Theres what I call evolutionary applications and what Ill call revolutionary applications. |
|
|
|
|
Evolutionary applications are the kind of applications that Ive been talking about up until now, employee scheduling, peptide design, portfolio optimization, autonomous vehicle routing. These are applications that companies
are actually solving today without quantum, but they are so hard to solve that theyre using heuristics to try to come up with good enough solutions. But with quantum, we can now give them optimal or better solutions, which allows their
business to operate better. Those are the evolutionary applications. |
|
|
|
|
Then there are the revolutionary applications. These are applications that we cant even start to tackle until we have quantum. And some of these would include things like designer drugs. So you mentioned drugs, designer drugs,
where Im designing a drug specifically for you and your collection of ailments or issues. Or global weather modeling to be able to do much more accurate disaster prediction. Or new materials design, for example, long lasting or forever lasting
batteries. I mean, wouldnt it be great if you never had to charge your cell phone again? So, these are the applications that are revolutionary that are, we cant even work on today, but will be made possible by quantum. |
|
|
Daniel Newman: |
|
Yeah, its really exciting. Its going to be a really interesting few years and interesting or exciting might be the best word, but its definitely going to be a big next decade for quantum computing and, for people
that have kind of watched on the sidelines and said, ah, I dont know, or, Ive actually heard pundits talk about how investable it is or isnt. I do think that a lot of times, sometimes at that kind of peak of where people start to
think something wont happen is exactly when it will. We have a very interesting habit, Alan in society that when things are good, we think they can never get worse. And when things are bad, we think they can never get better. And we tend to
always get that wrong. Perhaps theres a quantum algorithm or some sort of quantum application we can build to solve that as a society. |
|
|
|
|
|
But theres a fascinating discussion. Im always really interested in hearing where its going. And of course from someone like you, thats been in this space really for a long time, making real meaningful
impacts to whats going to happen in quantum. So Alan Baratz, thank you so much for joining me today at the Six Five Summit. |
|
|
Alan Baratz: |
|
Thanks Daniel. It was a pleasure. |
Important Information About the Proposed Transaction
between D-Wave Systems Inc. (D-Wave) and DPCM Capital, Inc. (DPCM Capital) and Where to Find It:
A full description of the terms of the transaction between D-Wave and DPCM Capital is provided in a
registration statement on Form S-4, as amended, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) by D-Wave Quantum Inc. that
includes a preliminary prospectus with respect to the combined companys securities, to be issued in connection with the transaction and a preliminary proxy statement with respect to the stockholder meeting of DPCM Capital to vote on the transaction. D-Wave Quantum Inc. and DPCM Capital urge investors, stockholders, and other interested persons to read the preliminary proxy statement/ prospectus, as well as other documents filed with the
SEC, because these documents contain important information about D-Wave Quantum Inc., DPCM Capital, D-Wave, and the transaction. After the
registration statement is declared effective, the definitive proxy statement/prospectus to be included in the registration statement will be mailed to stockholders of DPCM Capital as of a record date to be established for voting on the transaction.
Stockholders also may obtain a copy of the registration statement on Form S-4, as amendedincluding the proxy statement/prospectus and other documents filed with the SEC without chargeby
directing a request to: D-Wave Quantum Inc., 3033 Beta Avenue, Burnaby, BC V5G 4M9 Canada, or via email at shareholdercomm@dwavesys.com and DPCM Capital, 382 NE 191 Street, #24148, Miami, Florida
33179, or via email at mward@hstrategies.com. The preliminary and definitive proxy statement/prospectus to be included in the registration statement, once available, can also be obtained, without charge, at the SECs website (www.sec.gov).
No Offer or Solicitation
This communication is for
informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer or invitation for the sale or purchase of securities, assets, or the business described herein or a commitment to D-Wave Quantum Inc.,
DPCM Capital, or D-Wave, nor is it a solicitation of any vote, consent, or approval in any jurisdiction pursuant to or in connection with the transaction or otherwise, nor shall there be any sale,
issuance, or transfer of securities in any jurisdiction in contravention of applicable law.
Participants in Solicitation
D-Wave Quantum Inc., DPCM Capital, and D-Wave, and their
respective directors and executive officers, may be deemed participants in the solicitation of proxies of DPCM Capitals stockholders in respect of the transaction. Information about the directors and executive officers of DPCM Capital is set
forth in DPCM Capitals filings with the SEC. Information about the directors and executive officers of D-Wave Quantum Inc. and more detailed information regarding the identity of all potential
participants, and their direct and indirect interests by security holdings or otherwise, will be set forth in the definitive proxy statement/prospectus for the transaction when available. Additional information regarding the identity of all
potential participants in the solicitation of proxies to DPCM Capitals stockholders in connection with the proposed transaction and other matters to be voted upon at the special meeting, and their direct and indirect interests, by security
holdings or otherwise, will be included in the definitive proxy statement/prospectus, when it becomes available.
DPCM Capital (NYSE:XPOA)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Nov 2024 bis Dez 2024
DPCM Capital (NYSE:XPOA)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Dez 2023 bis Dez 2024