Item 8.01.
|
Other Information.
|
As previously disclosed, on September 15, 2019, SemGroup Corporation (SemGroup or the Company) entered into an Agreement and Plan
of Merger (the Merger Agreement) with Energy Transfer LP, a Delaware limited partnership (Energy Transfer) and Nautilus Merger Sub LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a newly formed, wholly owned subsidiary of
Energy Transfer (Merger Sub), pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into SemGroup (the Merger), with SemGroup continuing as the surviving company and a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Energy Transfer. On
October 30, 2019, SemGroup filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) a definitive proxy statement for the solicitation of proxies in connection with the special meeting of SemGroups stockholders to be held on
December 4, 2019, for purposes of voting, among other things, on the adoption of the Merger Agreement (the Proxy Statement/Prospectus).
In connection with the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, [seven] complaints, including multiple purported class action complaints,
have been filed on behalf of SemGroup stockholders against SemGroup and members of the SemGroups board of directors in the United States District Courts for the District of Delaware, Southern District of New York and the District of Colorado.
The [seven] complaints are captioned as follows: Walpole v. SemGroup Corporation et al., Case 1:19-cv-01957-MN (D. Del.)
(Oct. 15, 2019), Thompson v. SemGroup Corporation et al., Case 1:19-cv-01948-MN (D. Del.) (Oct. 15, 2019), Lawrence v.
SemGroup Corporation et al., Case 1:19-cv-02035-UNA (D. Del.) (Oct. 28, 2019), Topley v. SemGroup Corporation et al.,
Case 1:19-cv-09630 (S.D.N.Y.) (Oct. 18, 2019), Hills v. SemGroup Corporation et al., Case
1:19-cv-10412 (S.D.N.Y.) (Nov. 8, 2019), Marzacco v. SemGroup Corporation, et al., Case
1:19-cv-10610 (S.D.N.Y.) (Nov. 15, 2019), Stallings v. SemGroup Corporation et al., Case
1:19-cv-03108 (D.Co.) (Oct. 31, 2019), which SemGroup and Energy Transfer refer to collectively as the Stockholder Actions. In general, the Stockholder
Actions allege that the defendants violated Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or aided and abetted in such alleged violations, because the Proxy Statement/Prospectus allegedly
omits or misstates material information. The Stockholder Actions seek, among other things, injunctive relief preventing the consummation of the Merger, unspecified damages and attorneys fees.
SemGroup, Energy Transfer and the other named defendants believe that no supplemental disclosures are required under applicable laws; however, to avoid the
risk of the Stockholder Actions delaying the Merger and to minimize the expense of defending the Stockholder Actions, and without admitting any liability or wrongdoing, SemGroup and Energy Transfer are making certain disclosures below that
supplement and revise those contained in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, which SemGroup and Energy Transfer refer to as the litigation-related supplemental disclosures. The litigation-related supplemental disclosures contained below
should be read in conjunction with the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, which is available on the Internet site maintained by the SEC at http://www.sec.gov, along with periodic reports and other information SemGroup and Energy Transfer file with the SEC.
SemGroup, Energy Transfer and the other named defendants have denied, and continue to deny, that they have committed or assisted others in committing any violations of law, and expressly maintain that, to the extent applicable, they complied with
their legal obligations and are providing the litigation-related supplemental disclosures below solely to try to eliminate the burden and expense of further litigation, to put the claims that were or could have been asserted to rest, and to avoid
any possible delay to the closing of the Merger that might arise from further litigation. Nothing in the litigation-related supplemental disclosures shall be deemed an admission of the legal necessity or materiality under applicable laws of any of
the litigation-related supplemental disclosures set forth herein. To the extent that the information set forth herein differs from or updates information contained in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, the information set forth herein shall supersede
or supplement the information in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus. All page references are to pages in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, and terms used below, unless otherwise defined, have the meanings set forth in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
The members of the SemGroup board unanimously recommend that SemGroup stockholders vote FOR the merger proposal, FOR the advisory
compensation proposal and FOR the adjournment proposal.
2