UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014
 
OR
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from ____ to ____

Commission file number 001-35009
Fortegra Financial Corporation
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
 
58-1461399
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 
 
 
10151 Deerwood Park Boulevard, Building 100, Suite 330, Jacksonville, FL
 
32256
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
 
 
 
Registrant's telephone number, including area code:
 
(866) 961-9529


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o
 
Accelerated filer o
 
 
 
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Smaller reporting company x


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Yes o No x

The number of outstanding shares of the registrant's Common Stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding as of April 30, 2014 was 20,034,617 .








FORTEGRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
MARCH 31, 2014

TABLE OF CONTENTS



PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Page Number
 
 
 
Item 1.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
 
 
 
Item 3.
 
 
 
Item 4.
 
 
 
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
Item 1.
 
 
 
Item 1A.
 
 
 
Item 2.
 
 
 
Item 3.
 
 
 
Item 4.
 
 
 
Item 5.
 
 
 
Item 6.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


1


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this " Form 10-Q ") contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), which are made in reliance upon the protection provided by such act for forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations and projections relating to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business. You can identify forward-looking statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These statements may include words such as "anticipate," "estimate," "expect," "project,'' "plan," "intend," "believe," "may," "should," "can have," "will," "likely" and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of the timing or nature of future operating results or financial performance or other events.

The forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q are based on assumptions that we have made in light of our industry experience and our perceptions of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors we believe are appropriate under the circumstances. As you read this Form 10-Q , you should understand that these statements are not guarantees of performance or results. They involve risks, uncertainties (some of which are beyond our control) and assumptions. Although we believe that these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, you should be aware that many factors could affect our actual financial results and cause them to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. We believe these factors include, but are not limited to, those described under PART I, ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS and PART II, ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any of these assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results may vary materially from those projected in these forward-looking statements.

Any forward-looking statement made by us in this Form 10-Q speaks only as of the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q . Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether the result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as may be required by law.

This Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 ("2013 Form 10-K") along with the Company's other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").


PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this Form 10-Q to "Fortegra Financial," "Fortegra," "we," "us," "the Company" or similar terms refer to Fortegra Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries.



2


ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FORTEGRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
  CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
(All Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
 
At
 
March 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Assets:
 
 
 
Investments:
 
 
 
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale, at fair value (amortized cost of $136,351 at March 31, 2014 and $133,288 at December 31, 2013)
$
135,726

 
$
131,751

Equity securities available-for-sale, at fair value (cost of $7,081 at March 31, 2014 and $7,081 at December 31, 2013)
6,660

 
6,198

Short-term investments
871

 
871

Total investments
143,257

 
138,820

Cash and cash equivalents
10,974

 
21,681

Restricted cash
17,852

 
17,293

Accrued investment income
1,083

 
1,175

Notes receivable, net
15,912

 
11,920

Accounts and premiums receivable, net
20,526

 
18,702

Other receivables
28,376

 
33,409

Reinsurance receivables
210,900

 
215,084

Deferred acquisition costs
71,662

 
78,042

Property and equipment, net
13,898

 
14,332

Goodwill
73,701

 
73,701

Other intangible assets, net
47,856

 
49,173

Other assets
6,482

 
6,307

Assets of discontinued operations
791

 
791

Total assets
$
663,270

 
$
680,430

 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
Unpaid claims
$
36,632

 
$
34,732

Unearned premiums
249,353

 
256,380

Policyholder account balances
23,008

 
23,486

Accrued expenses, accounts payable and other liabilities
43,142

 
53,035

Income taxes payable
1,762

 
2,842

Deferred revenue
69,358

 
76,927

Notes payable
13,165

 
3,273

Preferred trust securities
35,000

 
35,000

Deferred income taxes, net
19,960

 
19,659

Liabilities of discontinued operations
1,236

 
8,603

Total liabilities
492,616

 
513,937

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 18)

 

Stockholders' Equity:
 
 
 
Preferred stock, par value $0.01; 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued

 

Common stock, par value $0.01; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 21,258,799 and 20,912,853 shares issued at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, including shares in treasury
213

 
209

Treasury stock, at cost; 1,224,182 shares at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively
(8,014
)
 
(8,014
)
Additional paid-in capital
99,687

 
99,398

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax
(2,622
)
 
(3,665
)
Retained earnings
75,430

 
72,532

Stockholders' equity before non-controlling interests
164,694

 
160,460

Non-controlling interests
5,960

 
6,033

Total stockholders' equity
170,654

 
166,493

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
$
663,270

 
$
680,430


See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

3


FORTEGRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)
(All Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2014
 
2013
Revenues:
 
 
 
Service and administrative fees
$
43,968

 
$
38,858

Ceding commissions
10,549

 
7,163

Net investment income
707

 
903

Net realized investment gains
1

 
7

Net earned premium
34,928

 
33,142

Other income
375

 
91

Total revenues
90,528

 
80,164

 
 
 
 
Expenses:
 
 
 
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses
10,826

 
10,535

Member benefit claims
10,671

 
9,366

Commissions
40,071

 
35,362

Personnel costs
10,191

 
10,797

Other operating expenses
8,225

 
8,075

Depreciation and amortization
1,249

 
1,177

Amortization of intangibles
1,317

 
1,468

Interest expense
920

 
853

Loss on note receivable
1,317

 

Total expenses
84,787

 
77,633

Income from continuing operations before income taxes
5,741

 
2,531

Income taxes - continuing operations
1,982

 
482

Income from continuing operations before non-controlling interests
3,759

 
2,049

Discontinued operations:
 
 
 
Income from discontinued operations - net of tax

 
1,262

Discontinued operations - net of tax

 
1,262

Net income before non-controlling interests
3,759

 
3,311

Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interests
861

 
818

Net income attributable to Fortegra Financial Corporation
$
2,898

 
$
2,493

 
 
 
 
Earnings per share - Basic:
 
 
 
Net income from continuing operations - net of tax
$
0.15

 
$
0.06

Discontinued operations - net of tax

 
0.07

Net income attributable to Fortegra Financial Corporation
$
0.15

 
$
0.13

 
 
 
 
Earnings per share - Diluted:
 
 
 
Net income from continuing operations - net of tax
$
0.14

 
$
0.06

Discontinued operations - net of tax

 
0.06

Net income attributable to Fortegra Financial Corporation
$
0.14

 
$
0.12

 
 
 
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
 
 
 
Basic
19,651,256

 
19,556,743

Diluted
20,436,442

 
20,625,041




See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

4


FORTEGRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Unaudited)
(All Amounts in Thousands)

 
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2014
 
2013
Net income before non-controlling interests
$
3,759

 
$
3,311

 
 
 
 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
 
 
 
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities:
 
 
 
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period
1,375

 
(51
)
Related tax (expense) benefit
(481
)
 
18

Reclassification of (gains) included in net income
(1
)
 
(7
)
Related tax expense

 
2

Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax
893

 
(38
)
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap:
 
 
 
Unrealized (loss) gain on interest rate swap
(45
)
 
32

Related tax benefit (expense)
15

 
(11
)
Reclassification of losses included in net income
282

 
277

Related tax benefit
(99
)
 
(97
)
Unrealized gain on interest rate swap, net of tax
153

 
201

 
 
 
 
Other comprehensive income
1,046

 
163

Comprehensive income
4,805

 
3,474

Less: comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests
864

 
818

Comprehensive income attributable to Fortegra Financial Corporation
$
3,941

 
$
2,656

































See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

5


FORTEGRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Unaudited)
(All Amounts in Thousands, Except Share Amounts)



 
Common Stock
 
Treasury Stock
 
Additional Paid-in Capital
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 
Retained Earnings
 
Non-controlling Interests
 
Total Stockholders' Equity
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, December 31, 2013
20,912,853

 
$
209

 
(1,224,182
)
 
$
(8,014
)
 
$
99,398

 
$
(3,665
)
 
$
72,532

 
$
6,033

 
$
166,493

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 
2,898

 
861

 
3,759

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 
1,043

 

 
3

 
1,046

Distributions to non-controlling interest partners

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(688
)
 
(688
)
Non-controlling interest attributable to the consolidation of Creative Investigations Recovery Group, LLC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(249
)
 
(249
)
Stock-based compensation
105,000

 
2

 

 

 
290

 

 

 

 
292

Direct stock awards to employees
124

 

 

 

 
1

 

 

 

 
1

Options exercised, net of shares surrendered
240,822

 
2

 

 

 
(2
)
 

 

 

 

Balance, March 31, 2014
21,258,799

 
$
213

 
(1,224,182
)
 
$
(8,014
)
 
$
99,687

 
$
(2,622
)
 
$
75,430

 
$
5,960

 
$
170,654

























See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

6


FORTEGRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(All Amounts in Thousands)
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2014
 
2013
Operating Activities:
 
 
 
Net income
$
2,898

 
$
2,493

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows (used in) operating activities:
 
 
 
Change in deferred acquisition costs
6,380

 
(4,303
)
Depreciation and amortization
2,566

 
3,266

Deferred income tax (benefit) expense - continuing operations
(263
)
 
860

Deferred income tax expense - discontinued operations

 
186

Net realized investment gains
(1
)
 
(7
)
Loss on note receivable
1,317

 

Stock-based compensation expense
292

 
303

Direct stock awards to employees
1

 
2

Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on investments
437

 
350

Non-controlling interests
861

 
818

Change in allowance for doubtful accounts
(162
)
 
11

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of the effects of acquisitions and dispositions:
 
 
 
Accrued investment income
27

 
56

Accounts and premiums receivable, net
(1,746
)
 
(6,868
)
Other receivables
4,921

 
(14,678
)
Reinsurance receivables
4,184

 
7,281

Income taxes receivable

 
(375
)
Other assets
(172
)
 
(887
)
Unpaid claims
1,900

 
948

Unearned premiums
(7,027
)
 
(10,612
)
Policyholder account balances
(478
)
 
(534
)
Accrued expenses, accounts payable and other liabilities
(9,809
)
 
12,592

Income taxes payable
(1,080
)
 

Deferred revenue
(7,570
)
 
7,803

Change in liabilities of discontinued operations
(7,367
)
 

Net cash flows (used in) operating activities
(9,891
)
 
(1,295
)
Investing activities:
 
 
 
Proceeds from maturities, calls and prepayments of available-for-sale investments
16,263

 
3,332

Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale investments
501

 
412

Purchases of available-for-sale investments
(20,267
)
 
(10,199
)
Purchases of property and equipment
(816
)
 
(993
)
Net paid for acquisitions of subsidiaries, net of cash received
20

 
(2,902
)
Net (issuance) from notes receivable
(5,162
)
 

Net proceeds from notes receivable

 
110

Net proceeds from related party note receivable

 
6,135

Change in restricted cash, net of restricted cash (paid) received from acquisitions and divestitures
(559
)
 
2,261

Net cash flows (used in) investing activities
(10,020
)
 
(1,844
)
Financing activities:
 
 
 
Payments on notes payable
(23,484
)
 
(8,188
)
Proceeds from notes payable
33,376

 
10,500

Distributions to non-controlling interest partners
(688
)
 

Dividends paid to non-controlling interests

 
(43
)
Net cash flows provided by financing activities
9,204

 
2,269

Net (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(10,707
)
 
(870
)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
21,681

 
31,339

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
$
10,974

 
$
30,469










See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

7

FORTEGRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All Amounts in Thousands, Except Share Amounts, Per Share Amounts or Unless Otherwise Noted)


Nature of Operations

Fortegra Financial Corporation (references in this Form 10-Q to "Fortegra Financial," "Fortegra," "we," "us," "the Company" or similar terms refer to Fortegra Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries), traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol: FRF , is an insurance services company headquartered in Jacksonville, Florida. Fortegra offers a wide array of revenue enhancing products, including payment protection products, motor club memberships, service contracts, device and warranty services, and administration services, to our business partners, including insurance companies, retailers, dealers, insurance brokers and agents and financial services companies. In 2008, the Company changed its name from Life of the South Corporation to Fortegra Financial Corporation. The Company was incorporated in 1981 in the State of Georgia and re-incorporated in the State of Delaware in 2010. The Company generates most of its business through networks of small to mid-sized community and regional banks, small loan companies, independent wireless retailers and automobile dealerships. The Company's subsidiaries (100% direct or indirect ownership, unless otherwise noted below) at March 31, 2014 , are as follows:
4Warranty Corporation ("4Warranty")
Auto Knight Motor Club, Inc. ("Auto Knight")
Continental Car Club, Inc. ("Continental")
CRC Reassurance Company, Ltd. ("CRC") *
Digital Leash, LLC, d/b/a ProtectCELL ("ProtectCELL"), 62.4% owned
Insurance Company of the South ("ICOTS") *
Life of the South Insurance Company ("LOTS") * and its subsidiary, Bankers Life of Louisiana ("Bankers Life") *
LOTS Intermediate Co. ("LOTS IM")
LOTS Reassurance Company ("LOTS RE") *
LOTSolutions, Inc.
Lyndon Southern Insurance Company ("Lyndon Southern") *
Pacific Benefits Group Northwest, LLC ("PBG")
Response Indemnity Company of California ("RICC") *
South Bay Acceptance Corporation ("South Bay")
South Bay Financial Services, LLC ("SBFS")
Southern Financial Life Insurance Company ("SFLAC"), 85.0% owned *
United Motor Club of America, Inc. ("United")

* = Insurance company subsidiary

1. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements of Fortegra have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP") promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") through the Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") for interim financial information, and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the Company's 2013 Form 10-K.

The interim consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q have not been audited. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited interim financial information reflects all adjustments, including normal recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly Fortegra's financial position, results of operations, other comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending on December 31, 2014.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Fortegra's interim Consolidated Financial Statements as of March 31, 2014 and 2013 are unaudited and have been prepared following the significant accounting policies disclosed in Note 2, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies," of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company's 2013 Form 10-K.

Principles of Consolidation
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Fortegra Financial Corporation and its majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries. All material intercompany account balances and transactions have been eliminated.


8

FORTEGRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All Amounts in Thousands, Except Share Amounts, Per Share Amounts or Unless Otherwise Noted)


Non-Controlling Interests
The third-party ownership of the common stock of SFLAC and of the ownership interests of ProtectCELL, which is treated as a partnership for income tax purposes, have been reflected as non-controlling interests on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. In addition, the Company's non-controlling interest includes the amount for the consolidation of the variable interest entity ("VIE"), Creative Investigations Recovery Group, LLC ("CIRG"). The following table shows the amount outstanding and the percentage of non-controlling interest by entity:
 
At
 
March 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
 
Amount
Percent
 
Amount
Percent
ProtectCELL
$
5,633

37.6
%
 
$
5,471

37.6
%
SFLAC
576

15.0
%
 
562

15.0
%
CIRG
(249
)
100.0
%
 

%
Total non-controlling interests
$
5,960

 
 
$
6,033

 

Income (loss) attributable to these non-controlling interests are presented on the Consolidated Statements of Income as net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests and on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income as comprehensive income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests.

Reportable Segment
The Company reports operating results and financial data in one operating and one reportable segment, Protection Products and Services. The Company has determined that its Chief Executive Officer is the Chief Operating Decision Maker. The financial results of the Company's single segment are equal to the net income from continuing operations reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income for all periods presented.

Discontinued Operations
The results of operations of a business of the Company that either has been disposed of or is classified as held-for-sale are reported in discontinued operations if: 1) the operations and cash flows of the component have been or will be eliminated from the ongoing operations of the Company as a result of the disposal transaction; and 2) the Company will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the component after the disposal transaction. The Company presents the operations of business(es) that meet the criteria for reporting as discontinued operations, and retrospectively reclassifies operating results for all prior periods presented.

On December 31, 2013, the Company completed the sale of its 100% ownership of Bliss and Glennon and eReinsure.com ("eReinsure"). The operating results of these businesses are presented in the line "Income from discontinued operations - net of tax" in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 . In accordance with accounting guidance, the Company has elected to not separately disclose the cash flows related to the Bliss and Glennon and eReinsure discontinued operations.

In addition, certain assets and liabilities associated with the disposition of Bliss and Glennon and eReinsure that are still subject to final settlement are included in the line items "Assets of discontinued operations" and "Liabilities of discontinued operations," in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2013 and at March 31, 2014. See the Note, "Divestitures," for more information on discontinued operations.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income and other items of comprehensive income. These other items are generally comprised of unrealized gains and losses on investment securities classified as available-for-sale and unrealized gains and losses on the interest rate swap, net of the related tax effects.

Use of Estimates
Preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications
Certain items in prior period consolidated financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current period presentation, which had no impact on net income, comprehensive income or loss, net cash provided by operating activities or stockholders' equity.


9

FORTEGRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All Amounts in Thousands, Except Share Amounts, Per Share Amounts or Unless Otherwise Noted)


Subsequent Events
The Company reviewed all material events subsequent to March 31, 2014 that occurred up to the date on which the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements were issued, to determine whether any event required recognition or disclosure in these Consolidated Financial Statements and/or disclosure in the notes thereto. For more information, please see the Note, "Subsequent Events."

3. Recent Accounting Standards

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists, to clarify the presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. ASU No. 2013-11 is effective prospectively for years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-11 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. ASU No. 2014-08 requires that a disposal representing a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s financial results or a business activity classified as held for sale should be reported as discontinued operations and also expands the disclosure requirements for discontinued operations and adds new disclosures for individually significant dispositions that do not qualify as discontinued operations. ASU No. 2014-08 is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim reporting periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2014 (early adoption is permitted only for disposals that have not been previously reported). The adoption of ASU No. 2014-08 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

4. Earnings Per Share

The following table details the earnings per share calculation:
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2014
 
2013
Numerator:  (for both basic and diluted earnings per share)
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations before non-controlling interests
$
3,759

 
$
2,049

Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interests
861

 
818

Net income from continuing operations - net of tax
2,898

 
1,231

Discontinued operations - net of tax

 
1,262

Net income attributable to Fortegra Financial Corporation
$
2,898

 
$
2,493

 
 
 
 
Denominator:
 
 
 
Total weighted average basic common shares outstanding
19,651,256

 
19,556,743

Effect of dilutive stock options and restricted stock awards
785,186

 
1,068,298

Total weighted average diluted common shares outstanding
20,436,442

 
20,625,041

 
 
 
 
Earnings per share - Basic:
 
 
 
Net income from continuing operations - net of tax
$
0.15

 
$
0.06

Discontinued operations - net of tax

 
0.07

Net income attributable to Fortegra Financial Corporation
$
0.15

 
$
0.13

 
 
 
 
Earnings per share - Diluted:
 
 
 
Net income from continuing operations - net of tax
$
0.14

 
$
0.06

Discontinued operations - net of tax

 
0.06

Net income attributable to Fortegra Financial Corporation
$
0.14

 
$
0.12

 
 
 
 
Weighted average anti-dilutive common shares
539,119

 
402,132



10

FORTEGRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All Amounts in Thousands, Except Share Amounts, Per Share Amounts or Unless Otherwise Noted)


5. Other Comprehensive Income

The following table presents the activity in AOCI for the following periods:
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
 
Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities
 
Net unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swap
 
Total
Balance at December 31, 2013, net of tax
$
(1,761
)
 
$
(1,904
)
 
$
(3,665
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications:
 
 
 
 
 
Pre-tax income (loss)
1,375

 
(45
)
 
1,330

Income tax (expense) benefit
(481
)
 
15

 
(466
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, net of tax
894

 
(30
)
 
864

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
 
 
 
 
 
Pre-tax (income) loss
(1
)
 
282

 
281

Income tax (benefit)

 
(99
)
 
(99
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
(1
)
 
183

 
182

Current period other comprehensive income, net of tax
893

 
153

 
1,046

Less: other comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest
3

 

 
3

Balance at March 31, 2014, net of tax
$
(871
)
 
$
(1,751
)
 
$
(2,622
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
 
Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities
 
Net unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swap
 
Total
Balance at December 31, 2012, net of tax
$
2,189

 
$
(2,820
)
 
$
(631
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications:
 
 
 
 
 
Pre-tax (loss) income
(51
)
 
32

 
(19
)
Income tax benefit (expense)
18

 
(11
)
 
7

Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications, net of tax
(33
)
 
21

 
(12
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
 
 
 
 
 
Pre-tax (income) loss
(7
)
 
277

 
270

Income tax expense (benefit)
2

 
(97
)
 
(95
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
(5
)
 
180

 
175

Current period other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
(38
)
 
201

 
163

Less: other comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2013, net of tax
$
2,151

 
$
(2,619
)
 
$
(468
)

The following table presents the reclassifications out of AOCI for the following periods:
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Consolidated Statement of Income Location
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities:
 
 
 
 
Reclassification of gains included in net income
$
1

 
$
7

Net realized investment gains (losses)
Related tax (expense)

 
(2
)
Income taxes
Net of tax
$
1

 
$
5

Net Income
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swap:
 
 
 
 
Reclassification of (losses) included in net income
$
(282
)
 
$
(277
)
Interest expense
Related tax benefit
99

 
97

Income taxes
Net of tax
$
(183
)
 
$
(180
)
Net Income


11

FORTEGRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All Amounts in Thousands, Except Share Amounts, Per Share Amounts or Unless Otherwise Noted)


6. Investments

The following table presents the Company's available-for-sale fixed maturity and equity securities:
 
At March 31, 2014
Description of Security
Cost or Amortized Cost
 
Gross Unrealized Gains
 
Gross Unrealized Losses
 
Fair Value
Obligations of the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agencies
$
47,480

 
$
213

 
$
(527
)
 
$
47,166

Municipal securities
28,921

 
94

 
(278
)
 
28,737

Corporate securities
58,950

 
376

 
(502
)
 
58,824

Obligations of foreign governments
1,000

 
3

 
(4
)
 
999

Total fixed maturity securities
$
136,351

 
$
686

 
$
(1,311
)
 
$
135,726

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common stock - publicly traded
$
39

 
$
8

 
$

 
$
47

Preferred stock - publicly traded
5,974

 
40

 
(465
)
 
5,549

Common stock - non-publicly traded
59

 
5

 
(13
)
 
51

Preferred stock - non-publicly traded
1,009

 
4

 

 
1,013

Total equity securities
$
7,081

 
$
57

 
$
(478
)
 
$
6,660

 
At December 31, 2013
Description of Security
Cost or Amortized Cost
 
Gross Unrealized Gains
 
Gross Unrealized Losses
 
Fair Value
Obligations of the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agencies
$
51,971

 
$
142

 
$
(678
)
 
$
51,435

Municipal securities
24,856

 
104

 
(413
)
 
24,547

Corporate securities
56,050

 
210

 
(900
)
 
55,360

Obligations of foreign governments
411

 

 
(2
)
 
409

Total fixed maturity securities
$
133,288

 
$
456

 
$
(1,993
)
 
$
131,751

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common stock - publicly traded
$
39

 
$
8

 
$

 
$
47

Preferred stock - publicly traded
5,974

 

 
(887
)
 
5,087

Common stock - non-publicly traded
59

 
5

 
(13
)
 
51

Preferred stock - non-publicly traded
1,009

 
4

 

 
1,013

Total equity securities
$
7,081

 
$
17

 
$
(900
)
 
$
6,198


Pursuant to certain reinsurance agreements and statutory licensing requirements, the Company has deposited invested assets in custody accounts or insurance department safekeeping accounts. The Company cannot remove invested assets from these accounts without prior approval of the contractual party or regulatory authority, as applicable. The following table presents the Company's restricted investments included in the Company's available-for-sale fixed maturity securities:
 
At
 
March 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Fair value of restricted investments for special deposits required by state insurance departments
$
10,254

 
$
10,339

Fair value of restricted investments in trust pursuant to reinsurance agreements
5,653

 
6,134

Fair value of restricted investments
$
15,907

 
$
16,473


The following table presents the amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity securities by contractual maturity. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
 
At March 31, 2014
 
At December 31, 2013
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
Due in one year or less
$
7,120

 
$
7,158

 
$
18,766

 
$
18,771

Due after one year through five years
70,866

 
70,982

 
69,380

 
69,355

Due after five years through ten years
36,150

 
35,634

 
22,622

 
21,731

Due after ten years
22,215

 
21,952

 
22,520

 
21,894

Total fixed maturity securities
$
136,351

 
$
135,726

 
$
133,288

 
$
131,751


12

FORTEGRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All Amounts in Thousands, Except Share Amounts, Per Share Amounts or Unless Otherwise Noted)


The following tables present information on unrealized losses on investment securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for less than twelve months, and twelve months or greater:
 
At March 31, 2014
 
Less than Twelve Months
 
Twelve Months or Greater
 
Total
Description of Security
Fair Value
Unrealized Losses
# of Securities
 
Fair Value
Unrealized Losses
# of Securities
 
Fair Value
Unrealized Losses
# of Securities
Obligations of the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agencies
$
24,330

$
524

51

 
$
225

$
3

6

 
$
24,555

$
527

57

Municipal securities
12,625

278

30

 



 
12,625

278

30

Corporate securities
25,981

415

42

 
2,498

87

3

 
28,479

502

45

Obligations of foreign governments
588

4

1

 



 
588

4

1

Total fixed maturity securities
$
63,524

$
1,221

124

 
$
2,723

$
90

9

 
$
66,247

$
1,311

133

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Preferred stock - publicly traded
4,526

465

8

 



 
4,526

465

8

Common stock - non-publicly traded



 
31

13

2

 
31

13

2

Total equity securities
$
4,526

$
465

8

 
$
31

$
13

2

 
$
4,557

$
478

10

 
At December 31, 2013
 
Less than Twelve Months
 
Twelve Months or Greater
 
Total
Description of Security
Fair Value
Unrealized Losses
# of Securities
 
Fair Value
Unrealized Losses
# of Securities
 
Fair Value
Unrealized Losses
# of Securities
Obligations of the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agencies
$
37,385

$
672

67

 
$
234

$
6

7

 
$
37,619

$
678

74

Municipal securities
10,080

413

23

 



 
10,080

413

23

Corporate securities
27,866

734

55

 
7,676

166

8

 
35,542

900

63

Obligations of foreign governments
409

2

1

 



 
409

2

1

Total fixed maturity securities
$
75,740

$
1,821

146

 
$
7,910

$
172

15

 
$
83,650

$
1,993

161

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Preferred stock - publicly traded
5,087

887

9

 



 
5,087

887

9

Common stock - non-publicly traded



 
31

13

2

 
31

13

2

Total equity securities
$
5,087

$
887

9

 
$
31

$
13

2

 
$
5,118

$
900

11

The Company does not intend to sell the investments that were in an unrealized loss position at March 31, 2014 and management believes that it is more likely than not that the Company will be able to hold these securities until full recovery of their amortized cost basis for fixed maturity securities or cost for equity securities. As of March 31, 2014 , based on the Company's review, none of the fixed maturity or equity securities were deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired based on the Company's analysis of the securities and its intent to hold the securities until recovery.

The following table presents the total gross proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale investment securities:
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2014
 
2013
Gross proceeds from sales
$
501

 
$
412


The following table presents the gross realized gains and gross realized losses for both fixed maturity and equity securities and realized losses for other-than-temporary impairments for available-for-sale investment securities:
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2014
 
2013
Gross realized gains
$
1

 
$
7

Gross realized losses

 

Total net gains from investment sales
1

 
7

Impairment write-downs (other-than-temporary impairments)

 

Net realized investment gains
$
1

 
$
7


13

FORTEGRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All Amounts in Thousands, Except Share Amounts, Per Share Amounts or Unless Otherwise Noted)



The following table presents the components of net investment income:
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2014
 
2013
Fixed income securities
$
615

 
$
737

Cash on hand and on deposit

 
20

Common and preferred stock dividends
98

 
76

Notes receivable
93

 
72

Other income

 
114

Investment expenses
(99
)
 
(116
)
Net investment income
$
707

 
$
903


7. Reinsurance Receivables

The following table presents the effect of reinsurance on premiums written and earned:
Premiums
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
Written
Earned
 
Written
Earned
Direct and assumed
$
101,472

$
108,499

 
$
81,510

$
92,122

Ceded
(69,590
)
(73,571
)
 
(50,676
)
(58,980
)
Net
$
31,882

$
34,928

 
$
30,834

$
33,142


The following table presents the effect of reinsurance on losses and loss adjustment expenses ("LAE") incurred:
Losses and LAE incurred
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2014
 
2013
Direct and assumed
$
26,118

 
$
21,040

Ceded
(15,292
)
 
(10,505
)
Net losses and LAE incurred
$
10,826

 
$
10,535


The following table presents the components of the reinsurance receivables:
At
 
March 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Prepaid reinsurance premiums:
 
 
 
Life (1)
$
49,995

 
$
51,355

Accident and health (1)
34,088

 
36,214

Property
97,714

 
98,650

Total
181,797

 
186,219

Ceded claim reserves:
 
 
 
Life
1,601

 
1,594

Accident and health
7,417

 
7,826

Property
14,118

 
12,102

Total ceded claim reserves recoverable
23,136

 
21,522

Other reinsurance settlements recoverable
5,967

 
7,343

Reinsurance receivables
$
210,900

 
$
215,084

(1) Including policyholder account balances ceded.

The following table presents the aggregate amount included in reinsurance receivables that is comprised of the three largest receivable balances from unrelated reinsurers:
 
At
 
March 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Total of the three largest receivable balances from unrelated reinsurers
$
131,151

 
$
136,061


At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 , respectively, the three unrelated reinsurers from whom the Company has the largest receivable balances were: London Life Reinsurance Company (A. M. Best Rating: A), London Life International Reinsurance

14

FORTEGRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All Amounts in Thousands, Except Share Amounts, Per Share Amounts or Unless Otherwise Noted)


Corporation (A. M. Best Rating: Not rated) and Spartan Property Insurance Company (A. M. Best Rating: Not rated). The related receivables of Spartan Property Insurance Company and London Life International Reinsurance Corporation are collateralized by assets held in trust accounts and letters of credit due to their offshore relationships. At March 31, 2014 , the Company does not believe there is a risk of loss as a result of the concentration of credit risk in the reinsurance program.

8. Deferred Acquisition Costs

Deferred Acquisition Costs - Insurance Related
The following table presents the amortization of deferred acquisition costs for the Company's insurance contracts:
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2014
 
2013
Total amortization of deferred acquisition costs - insurance related
$
17,242

 
$
16,291


Deferred Acquisition Costs - Non-insurance Related
The following table presents the amortization of deferred acquisition costs for the Company's non-insurance products:
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2014
 
2013
Total amortization of deferred acquisition costs - non-insurance related
$
14,497

 
$
19,815


9. Divestitures

Discontinued Operations
On December 31, 2013 , the Company completed the previously announced sale of all of the issued and outstanding stock of its subsidiaries Bliss and Glennon and eReinsure, to AmWINS Holdings, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company ("AmWINS") (the "Disposition"), pursuant to the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement (the "Purchase Agreement"), dated December 2, 2013 .

The Company received net cash proceeds of $81.8 million for the Disposition, representing gross proceeds of $83.5 million less $1.0 million in transaction fees paid at the time of closing and $0.7 million of cash held by the disposed entities. The proceeds are subject to certain purchase price adjustments as set forth in the Purchase Agreement to reflect fluctuations in working capital, including adjustments for any receivable balances as of the disposition date that are not collected within one year.

As a result of the Disposition, the Company no longer operates in the businesses of wholesale insurance brokerage and selling or licensing of a computerized system or platform for the negotiation and/or placement of facultative reinsurance. As of and after December 31, 2013, the Company does not beneficially own the disposed businesses and will no longer consolidate Bliss and Glennon or eReinsure into its financial results. The historical financial results of the disposed businesses for periods prior to the Disposition are reflected in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Income as income from discontinued operations - net of tax. The Company allocated interest expense to the discontinued operations based on the anticipated net proceeds that would be applied to the repayment of the credit facilities outstanding at the respective time, multiplied by the respective interest rate of the credit facilities at the respective time.

The following table presents the assets and liabilities of the discontinued operations included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
 
At
 
March 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Assets:
 
 
 
Other receivables
$
791

 
$
791

Assets of discontinued operations
$
791

 
$
791

 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
Accrued expenses, accounts payable and other liabilities
$
1,236

 
$
2,708

Income taxes payable

 
5,895

Liabilities of discontinued operations
$
1,236

 
$
8,603



15

FORTEGRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All Amounts in Thousands, Except Share Amounts, Per Share Amounts or Unless Otherwise Noted)


The following table presents the amounts related to the Company's discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the following period:
 
For the Three Months Ended
 
March 31, 2013
Income from discontinued operations:
 
Revenues:
 
Brokerage commissions and fees
$
9,731

Net investment income
6

Total revenues
9,737

 
 
Expenses:
 
Personnel costs
5,049

Other operating expenses
1,342

Depreciation and amortization
141

Amortization of intangibles
480

Interest expense
591

Total expenses
7,603

Income from discontinued operations before income taxes
2,134

Income taxes - discontinued operations
872

Income from discontinued operations - net of tax
$
1,262


10. Other Intangible Assets

The following table presents finite-lived other intangible assets and their respective amortization periods:
 
 
 
 
 
At March 31, 2014
 
At December 31, 2013
 
Amortization Period (Years)
 
Gross Carrying Amount
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Net Carrying Amount
 
Gross Carrying Amount
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Net Carrying Amount
Customer and agent relationships
7
to
15
 
$
40,075

 
$
(14,337
)
 
$
25,738

 
$
40,075

 
$
(13,262
)
 
$
26,813

Tradenames
8
to
10
 
1,460

 
(166
)
 
1,294

 
1,460

 
(128
)
 
1,332

Software
2.25
to
10
 
5,336

 
(3,117
)
 
2,219

 
5,336

 
(2,930
)
 
2,406

Present value of future profits
0.3
to
0.75
 
548

 
(548
)
 

 
548

 
(548
)
 

Non-compete agreements
1.5
to
6
 
1,378

 
(912
)
 
466

 
1,378

 
(895
)
 
483

Total finite-lived other intangible assets
 
 
 
 
$
48,797

 
$
(19,080
)
 
$
29,717

 
$
48,797

 
$
(17,763
)
 
$
31,034

The following table presents the carrying amount of indefinite-lived other intangible assets:
At
 
March 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Tradenames
$
17,764

 
$
17,764

Licenses
375

 
375

Total
$
18,139

 
$
18,139


The following table presents the activity in other intangible assets:
Balance at December 31, 2013
$
49,173

Less: amortization expense
1,317

Balance at March 31, 2014
$
47,856



16

FORTEGRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All Amounts in Thousands, Except Share Amounts, Per Share Amounts or Unless Otherwise Noted)


The following table presents estimated amortization of finite-lived other intangible assets for the next five years and thereafter ending December 31:
 
Estimated Amortization Expense
Remainder of 2014
$
3,952

2015
5,115

2016
4,868

2017
3,648

2018
2,230

Thereafter
9,904

Total
$
29,717


11. Variable Interest Entity

In July 2011, the Company sold its 100% interest in CIRG. The consideration included a note receivable, with a first priority lien security interest in the assets of CIRG and other property of the buyers. As previously disclosed, the Company has a variable interest in CIRG. Prior to March 31, 2014, the Company did not consolidate CIRG into its results, because the Company was not the primary beneficiary.

During 2013, the buyers were unable to make the scheduled payments on the note, and the parties executed a forbearance agreement along with a security agreement and a subordination agreement designed to allow more flexibility in timing of repayment. The Company also provided $0.1 million in short term funding.

In March 2014, the Company notified the buyers of the cessation of forbearance, and began to exercise certain of the rights and remedies afforded by the note and related agreements to preserve its economic interest, including steps to protect assets of CIRG. The Company also provided additional short term funding. The Company has not taken ownership of CIRG, but the Company now has power over the VIE, and has consolidated the immaterial balances of CIRG as of March 31, 2014.

In March 31, 2014 , the Company established an allowance for the full value of the note and accrued interest, incurring a charge of $1.3 million . The Company's maximum exposure to further loss in the VIE is limited to the balance of the short term funding.
 
At
 
March 31, 2014
The Company's maximum exposure to loss in the VIE
$
174


12. Notes Payable

The Company's Notes Payable consisted of the following:
At
 
March 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. credit facility, maturing August 2019 (1)
$
7,067

 
$

Synovus Bank, revolving line of credit, maturing April 2017
6,098

 
3,273

Total
$
13,165

 
$
3,273

 
 
 
 
Maximum balance allowed on the Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. credit facility (1)
$
100,000

 
$
75,000

Interest rate at the end of the respective period, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. credit facility  (2)
4.25
%
 
%
 
 
 
 
Maximum balance allowed on the Synovus Bank, revolving line of credit
$
15,000

 
$
15,000

Interest rate at the end of the respective period, Synovus Bank, revolving line of credit
3.24
%
 
3.24
%
(1) - The maturity date was extended to August 2, 2019 and the maximum balance was increased to $100.0 million , effective April 11, 2014.
(2) - At December 31, 2013 the Company had no borrowings outstanding under the Revolving Facility, thus no interest rate can be defined.


17

FORTEGRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All Amounts in Thousands, Except Share Amounts, Per Share Amounts or Unless Otherwise Noted)


The following table presents the aggregate maturities for the Company's notes payable by year at March 31, 2014 :
 
Maturities
Remainder of 2014
$
6,098

2015

2016

2017

2018

Thereafter (1)
7,067

Total maturities
$
13,165

(1) - Effective April 11, 2014, the maturity date was extended to August 2, 2019.

$100.0 million Secured Credit Agreement - Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
On April 11, 2014 the Comp any amended the original credit agreement, entered into on August 2, 2012 , (as amended, the "Credit Agreement"), with a syndicate of lenders, among them Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., who also serves as administrative agent ("Wells Fargo" or the "Administrative Agent"). The Credit Agreement provides for an extended maturity to August 2, 2019 (subject to earlier termination) and an increased revolving credit facility of $100.0 million (the "Revolving Facility") with a sub-limit of $10.0 million for swingline loans and $10.0 million for letters of credit. The Credit Agreement includes a provision pursuant to which, from time to time, the Company may request that the lenders in their discretion increase the maximum amount of commitments under the Facilities by an amount not to exceed $50.0 million . The Credit Agreement also contains financial covenants, which the Company must maintain. See the section below, "Financial Covenants" for a presentation of the Company's more significant covenants associated with the Credit Agreement. The amendment to the Credit Agreement also serves to (1) reduce the interest rate margin on revolving loans by 0.35% for each pricing level and (2) reduce the unused line fee paid on undrawn revolving commitments by 0.05% for each pricing level.

Financial Covenants - Secured Credit Agreement - Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 , respectively, the Company was required to comply with various financial covenants set forth in the Credit Agreement. The following describes the Credit Agreement's more significant financial covenants in effect at March 31, 2014 and the calculations used to arrive at each ratio (capitalized terms used but not defined in this paragraph are defined in the Credit Agreement or as otherwise provided below):

Total Leverage Ratio - the ratio of (i) Consolidated Total Debt as of such date to (ii) Consolidated Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization ("Adjusted EBITDA") for the Measurement Period ending on or immediately prior to such date.

Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio - the ratio of (a) Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA less the actual amount paid by the Borrowers and their Subsidiaries in cash on account of Capital Expenditures less cash taxes paid by the Borrowers and their Subsidiaries to (b) Consolidated Fixed Charges, in each case for the Measurement Period ending on or immediately prior to such date.

Reinsurance Ratio - the ratio (expressed as a percentage) of (a) the aggregate amounts recoverable by the Borrowers and its Subsidiaries from reinsurers divided by (b) the sum of (i) policy and claim liabilities plus (ii) unearned premiums, in each case of the Borrowers and their Subsidiaries determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Risk-Based Capital ("RBC") Ratio - the ratio (expressed as a percentage) of NAIC RBC (as defined in the NAIC standards) for any Regulated Insurance Company on an individual basis, calculated at the end of any Fiscal Year, to the "authorized control level" (as defined in the NAIC standards).

18

FORTEGRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All Amounts in Thousands, Except Share Amounts, Per Share Amounts or Unless Otherwise Noted)



The following table presents the Credit Agreement's more significant financial covenants at March 31, 2014 , except for the RBC ratios, which under the Credit Agreement reflect the ratios calculated as of the most recent year-end, in this case, December 31, 2013:
 
 
Actual At
Covenant
Covenant Requirement
 
March 31, 2014
Total leverage ratio
not more than 3.25
 
0.84
Fixed charge coverage ratio
not less than 2.00
 
3.51
Reinsurance ratio
not less than 50%
 
68.0%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Actual At
 
 
 
December 31, 2013
RBC Ratios:
 
 
 
RBC Ratio - Bankers Life of Louisiana
not less than 250%
 
435.0%
RBC Ratio - Southern Financial Life Insurance Company
not less than 250%
 
2,096.0%
RBC Ratio - Insurance Company of the South
not less than 250%
 
366.0%
RBC Ratio - Lyndon Southern Insurance Company
not less than 250%
 
305.0%
RBC Ratio - Life of the South Insurance Company
not less than 250%
 
430.0%
RBC Ratio - Response Indemnity Company of California
not less than 250%
 
39,754.0%

$15.0 million Revolving Line of Credit - Synovus Bank
At March 31, 2014 , the Company's subsidiary , South Bay had a $15.0 million revolving line of credit agreement (the "Line of Credit") with Synovus Bank, entered into in October 2013 , with a maturity date of April 2017 .  The Line of Credit bears interest at a rate of 300 basis points plus 90-day LIBOR. South Bay uses the Line of Credit for its premium-financing product. The Line of Credit allows South Bay to finance up to 90% of the eligible receivables less an applicable reserve of $500,000 . At March 31, 2014 , the balance of premium financing receivables included in notes receivable, net, on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, totaled $9.8 million . At March 31, 2014, South Bay was in compliance with the covenants required by the Line of Credit.

13. Derivative Financial Instruments - Interest Rate Swap

The Company has an interest rate swap (the "Swap") with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., pursuant to which the Company swapped the floating rate portion of its outstanding preferred trust securities to a fixed rate. The Swap, which is designated as a cash flow hedge, commenced in June 2012 and expires in June 2017. The following table presents the fair value (including accrued interest) and the related outstanding notional amount of the Company's single derivative instrument and indicates where within the Consolidated Balance Sheets each amount is reported:
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
At
 
 
March 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap - notional value

 
$
35,000

 
$
35,000

Fair value of the Swap
Accrued expenses, accounts payable and other liabilities
 
2,693

 
2,930

Unrealized loss, net of tax, on the fair value of the Swap
AOCI
 
1,751

 
1,904

Variable rate of the interest rate swap
 
 
0.23
%
 
0.24
%
Fixed rate of the interest rate swap  
 
 
3.47
%
 
3.47
%

The following table presents the pretax impact of the Swap on the Consolidated Financial Statements for the following periods:
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2014
 
2013
(Loss) gain recognized in AOCI on the derivative-effective portion
$
(45
)
 
$
32

 
 
 
 
Loss reclassified from AOCI into income-effective portion
$
282

 
$
277

 
 
 
 
Gain (loss) recognized in income on the derivative-ineffective portion
$

 
$



19

FORTEGRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All Amounts in Thousands, Except Share Amounts, Per Share Amounts or Unless Otherwise Noted)


The following table presents the estimated amount to be reclassified to earnings from AOCI during the next 12 months. These net losses reclassified into earnings are primarily expected to increase net interest expense related to the respective hedged item.
 
At
 
March 31, 2014
Estimated loss to be reclassified to earnings from AOCI during the next 12 months
$
1,133


14. Stock-Based Compensation

Stock Options
The Company granted 15,000 time-based stock options during the three months ended March 31, 2014 , which vest in equal amounts on each of the four anniversaries of the grant date. The following table presents the Company's time-based and performance-based stock option activity for the current period:
 
Time-Based
 
Performance-Based
 
Options Outstanding
 
Weighted Average Exercise Price (in dollars per share)
 
Options Exercisable
 
Weighted Average Exercise Price (in dollars per share)
 
Options Outstanding
 
Weighted Average Exercise Price (in dollars per share)
 
Options Exercisable
 
Weighted Average Exercise Price (in dollars per share)
Balance, December 31, 2013
1,930,407

 
$
4.22

 
1,806,251

 
$
3.98

 
289,306

 
$
8.46

 

 
$

Granted
15,000

 
8.27

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vested

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised
(391,389
)
 
3.10

 
(391,389
)
 
3.10

 

 

 

 

Canceled/forfeited
(74,176
)
 
7.90

 
(74,176
)
 
7.90

 

 

 

 

Balance, March 31, 2014
1,479,842

 
$
4.37

 
1,340,686

 
$
4.01

 
289,306

 
$
8.46

 

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average remaining contractual term at March 31, 2014 (in years)
3.8

 
 
 
3.3

 
 
 
8.5

 
 
 

 
 

The following table presents the weighted average assumptions used to estimate the fair values of all stock options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2014 :
 
Assumptions
Expected term (years)
6.25

Expected volatility
33.83
%
Expected dividends
%
Risk-free rate
2.19
%

Restricted Stock Awards
During the three months ended March 31, 2014 , the Company granted 30,000 time-based restricted stock awards to its Chief Executive Officer and 75,000 time-based restricted stock awards, equally distributed to five of its Directors. These awards will vest in equal amounts on each of the three anniversaries of the grant date.

The following table presents the Company's time-based and performance-based restricted stock award activity for the current period:
 
Time-Based
 
Performance-Based
 
Shares
 
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
 
Shares
 
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Shares outstanding at December 31, 2013
139,680

 
$
8.59

 
130,629

 
$
10.20

Grants
105,000

 
7.26

 

 

Vests
(45,000
)
 
8.51

 

 

Forfeitures

 

 

 

Shares outstanding at March 31, 2014
199,680

 
$
7.91

 
130,629

 
$
10.20



20

FORTEGRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All Amounts in Thousands, Except Share Amounts, Per Share Amounts or Unless Otherwise Noted)


Stock-based Compensation Expense
The following table presents the total time-based and performance-based stock-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit recognized on the Consolidated Statements of Income:
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2014
 
2013
Personnel costs
$
160

 
$
185

Other operating expenses
132

 
118

Income tax benefit
(112
)
 
(116
)
Net stock-based compensation expense
$
180

 
$
187

Additional information on total non-vested stock-based compensation is as follows:
At March 31, 2014
 
Stock Options
 
Restricted Stock Awards
Unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested awards
$
398

 
$
1,517

Weighted-average recognition period (in years)
3.2

 
3.6


For the three months ended March 31, 2014 , the Company did not recognize expense on 149,306 performance-based stock options and 49,768 performance-based restricted stock awards because the attainment of the performance metrics associated with these awards was not probable based on current projections.

15. Income Taxes

The following table presents the provision for income taxes for both continuing and discontinued operations:
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2014
 
2013
Income taxes - continuing operations
$
1,982

 
$
482

Income taxes - discontinued operations

 
872

Income taxes
$
1,982

 
$
1,354


The following table presents the provision for income taxes from continuing operations:
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2014
 
2013
Current
$
2,245

 
$
(378
)
Deferred
(263
)
 
860

Income taxes - continuing operations
$
1,982

 
$
482


The following table presents a reconciliation of income taxes from continuing operations calculated at the federal statutory rate of 35% and the income tax expense attributable to continuing operations for the following periods:
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2014
2013
 
Amount
 
Percent of Pre-tax Income
 
Amount
 
Percent of Pre-tax Income
Income taxes at federal income tax rate
$
2,009

 
35.00
 %
 
$
886

 
35.00
 %
Effect of:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Small life deduction
(107
)
 
(1.86
)
 
(109
)
 
(4.31
)
Non-deductible expenses
22

 
0.38

 
18

 
0.71

Tax exempt interest
(34
)
 
(0.59
)
 
(31
)
 
(1.22
)
State taxes
162

 
2.82

 
59

 
2.33

Non-controlling interest
(304
)
 
(5.30
)
 
(286
)
 
(11.30
)
Other, net
234

 
4.08

 
(55
)
 
(2.17
)
Income taxes - continuing operations
$
1,982

 
34.53
 %
 
$
482

 
19.04
 %


21

FORTEGRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All Amounts in Thousands, Except Share Amounts, Per Share Amounts or Unless Otherwise Noted)


At March 31, 2014 , the Company had a net operating loss carry forward of $0.6 million , which is subject to certain limitations under IRC Section 382 and will begin to expire in December 31, 2025 . The Company expects to utilize the full amount of the net operating loss carryforward.

The Company has reviewed its uncertain tax positions and management has concluded that there are no additional amounts required to be recorded.

In 2012, the Company was under examination by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") for the 2010 and 2009 tax years. In February 2013 , the IRS completed its field audit for those tax years and presented its findings.  The Company agreed to those findings and expensed $57.0 thousand in the first quarter of 2013.

The Company's income tax returns are subject to review and examination by federal and state taxing authorities. The Company is currently open to audit under the applicable statutes of limitations by the IRS for the tax years 2011 through 2013 . The years open to examination by state taxing authorities vary by jurisdiction. There are no extensions of the statute of limitations to assess income taxes currently in effect.

16. Fair Value of Financial Instruments 

The carrying and fair values of financial instruments are as follows:
At
 
March 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
 
Carrying Value
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying Value
 
Fair Value
Financial assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
10,974

 
$
10,974

 
$
21,681

 
$
21,681

Restricted cash
17,852

 
17,852

 
17,293

 
17,293

Fixed maturity securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Obligations of the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agencies
47,166

 
47,166

 
51,435

 
51,435

Municipal securities
28,737

 
28,737

 
24,547

 
24,547

Corporate securities
58,824

 
58,824

 
55,360

 
55,360

Obligations of foreign governments
999

 
999

 
409

 
409

Equity securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common stock - publicly traded
47

 
47

 
47

 
47

Preferred stock - publicly traded
5,549

 
5,549

 
5,087

 
5,087

Common stock - non-publicly traded
51

 
51

 
51

 
51

Preferred stock - non-publicly traded
1,013

 
1,013

 
1,013

 
1,013

Notes receivable
15,912

 
15,912

 
11,920

 
11,920

Accounts and premiums receivable, net
20,526

 
20,526

 
18,702

 
18,702

Other receivables
28,376

 
28,376

 
33,409

 
33,409

Short-term investments
871

 
871

 
871

 
871

Total financial assets
$
236,897

 
$
236,897

 
$
241,825

 
$
241,825

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes payable
$
13,165

 
$
13,165

 
$
3,273

 
$
3,273

Preferred trust securities
35,000

 
35,000

 
35,000

 
35,000

Interest rate swap
2,693

 
2,693

 
2,930

 
2,930

Total financial liabilities
$
50,858

 
$
50,858

 
$
41,203

 
$
41,203



22

FORTEGRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All Amounts in Thousands, Except Share Amounts, Per Share Amounts or Unless Otherwise Noted)


The Company's financial assets and liabilities accounted for at fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
 
At March 31, 2014
 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using:
 
 
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
Significant other observable inputs
Significant unobservable inputs
 
 Fair Value
 (Level 1)
 (Level 2)
 (Level 3)
Financial Assets:
 
 
 
 
Fixed maturity securities:
 
 
 
 
Obligations of the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agencies
$
47,166

$

$
47,166

$

Municipal securities
28,737


28,737


Corporate securities
58,824


58,824


Obligations of foreign governments
999


999


Equity securities:
 
 
 
 
Common stock - publicly traded
47

47



Preferred stock - publicly traded
5,549

5,549



Common stock - non-publicly traded
51



51

Preferred stock - non-publicly traded
1,013



1,013

Short-term investments
871

871



Total assets
$
143,257

$
6,467

$
135,726

$
1,064

 
 
 
 
 
Financial Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap
$
2,693

$

$
2,693

$


 
At December 31, 2013
 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using:
 
 
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
Significant other observable inputs
Significant unobservable inputs
 
 Fair Value
 (Level 1)
 (Level 2)
 (Level 3)
Financial Assets:
 
 
 
 
Fixed maturity securities:
 
 
 
 
Obligations of the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agencies
$
51,435

$

$
51,435

$

Municipal securities
24,547


24,547


Corporate securities
55,360


55,360


Obligations of foreign governments
409


409


Equity securities:
 
 
 
 
Common stock - publicly traded
47

47



Preferred stock - publicly traded
5,087

5,087



Common stock - non-publicly traded
51



51

Preferred stock - non-publicly traded
1,013



1,013

Short-term investments
871

871



Total Assets
$
138,820

$
6,005

$
131,751

$
1,064

 
 
 
 
 
Financial Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap
$
2,930

$

$
2,930

$

There were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 . The Company's use of Level 3 unobservable inputs included six individual securities that accounted for 0.7% of total investments at March 31, 2014 . The Company utilized an independent third party pricing service to value four of the Level 3 securities. The values of two equity securities in Level 3, which are non-publicly traded preferred stocks, were calculated by the Company. One of the equity securities, with a value of $1.0 million was valued by taking into account the strength of the issuer's parent company guaranteeing the dividend of the issuer. While one of the Level 3 equity securities, with a value of $13.0 thousand , was valued by estimating the total value of the Class-A shares outstanding by the issuer and a review of the company's audited financial statements. At December 31, 2013 , the Company had six individual securities valued under Level 3 that accounted for 0.8% of total investments.

23

FORTEGRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All Amounts in Thousands, Except Share Amounts, Per Share Amounts or Unless Otherwise Noted)


The following table presents the changes in Level 3 assets measured at fair value:
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2014
 
2013
Beginning balance, January 1,
$
1,064

 
$
1,123

Total investment gains or losses (realized/unrealized):
 
 
 
Included in other comprehensive (loss)

 
(25
)
Transfers (out of) Level 3

 
(27
)
Ending balance, March 31,
$
1,064

 
$
1,071


17. Statutory Reporting and Insurance Company Subsidiaries Dividend Restrictions

The Company's insurance company subsidiaries may pay dividends to the Company, subject to statutory restrictions. Payments in excess of statutory restrictions (extraordinary dividends) to the Company are permitted only with prior approval of the insurance department of the applicable state of domicile. The Company eliminated all dividends from its subsidiaries in the Consolidated Financial Statements. The following table sets forth the dividends paid to the Company by its insurance company subsidiaries for the following periods:
 
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
For the Twelve Months Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
Ordinary dividends
$

 
$
2,383

Extraordinary dividends

 

Total dividends
$

 
$
2,383


The following table presents the combined statutory capital and surplus of the Company's insurance company subsidiaries, the required minimum statutory capital and surplus, as required by the laws of the states in which they are domiciled and the combined amount available for ordinary dividends of the Company's insurance company subsidiaries for the following periods:
 
At
 
March 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Combined statutory capital and surplus of the Company's insurance company subsidiaries
$
75,079

 
$
69,269

 
 
 
 
Required minimum statutory capital and surplus
$
17,200

 
$
17,200

 


 


Amount available for ordinary dividends of the Company's insurance company subsidiaries
$
4,244

 
$
3,989


At March 31, 2014 , the maximum amount of dividends that our regulated insurance company subsidiaries could pay under applicable laws and regulations without regulatory approval was $4.2 million . The Company may seek regulatory approval to pay dividends in excess of this permitted amount, but there can be no assurance that the Company would receive regulatory approval if sought.

Under the NAIC's Risk-Based Capital Act of 1995, a company's Risk-Based Capital ("RBC") is calculated by applying certain risk factors to various asset, claim and reserve items. If a company's adjusted surplus falls below calculated RBC thresholds, regulatory intervention or oversight is required. The Company's insurance company subsidiaries' RBC levels, as calculated in accordance with the NAIC's RBC instructions, exceeded all RBC thresholds as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 , respectively.

18. Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments
The Company, in the ordinary course of normal business, may enter from time to time into certain contractual obligations or commitments. The Company's commitments, as of March 31, 2014 , have not materially changed from those disclosed in the note "Commitments and Contingencies," in the Company's 2013 Form 10-K.

Contingencies
The Company is a party to claims and litigation in the normal course of its operations. Management believes that the ultimate outcome of these matters in existence at March 31, 2014 are reserved against, covered by insurance or would not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.


24

FORTEGRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All Amounts in Thousands, Except Share Amounts, Per Share Amounts or Unless Otherwise Noted)


The Company is currently a defendant in Mullins v. Southern Financial Life Insurance Co., which was filed on February 2, 2006, in the Pike Circuit Court, in the Commonwealth of Kentucky.  A class was certified on June 25, 2010.  At issue is the duration or term of coverage under certain policies.  The action alleges violations of the Consumer Protection Act and certain insurance statutes, as well as common law fraud.  The action seeks compensatory and punitive damages, attorney fees and interest.  The parties are currently involved in the merits discovery phase and discovery disputes have arisen.  Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Sanctions on April 5, 2012 in connection with the Company's efforts to locate and gather certificates and other documents from the Company's agents.  While the court did not award sanctions, it did order the Company to subpoena certain records from its agents.  In an effort to prevent the trial court from enforcing the order, the Company filed a Writ of Prohibition, which the Kentucky Court of Appeals denied on August 31, 2012.  In response, the Company filed a motion for discretionary review of the Writ of Prohibition.  The Company also filed a direct appeal of the same order, on the grounds that the order could be construed as a finding of contempt on the part of the Company.  The Court of Appeals dismissed the direct appeal on September 13, 2013, which prompted the Company to file a motion for discretionary review of the direct appeal.  The Kentucky Supreme Court denied the Writ of Prohibition on November 21, 2013, and subsequently denied the direct appeal in April 2014.  No hearings are currently scheduled and no trial date has been set.

The Company considers such litigation customary in its lines of business.  In management's opinion, based on information available at this time, the ultimate resolution of such litigation, which it is vigorously defending, should not be materially adverse to the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company. It should be noted that large punitive damage awards, bearing little relation to actual damages sustained by plaintiffs, have been awarded in certain states against other companies in the credit insurance business. Loss contingencies may be taken as developments warrant, although such amounts are not reasonably estimable at this time.

19. Related Party Transactions
In conjunction with the December 31, 2012 acquisition of ProtectCELL, the Company assumed an office space lease between ProtectCELL and 39500 High Pointe, LLC ("High Pointe"). The ownership of High Pointe includes three members who were the founding members of ProtectCELL and are now employees of the Company. The table below presents the lease payments made to High Pointe.

At December 31, 2012, ProtectCELL held a $6.1 million note receivable carrying an interest rate of 8.00% from High Pointe, which is fully secured by a mortgage on the office building owned by High Pointe (see the lease described above). On March 15, 2013 , ProtectCELL received $6.1 million from High Pointe, representing the full payoff of the outstanding balance of the note receivable. The Company only recorded interest income on this note receivable during the three months ended March 31, 2013.

An executive officer of ProtectCELL owned multiple wireless retail locations, which sell ProtectCELL protection plans to wireless retail customers. The executive sold these wireless retail locations in February 2014. The table below presents the income recorded on and the commissions paid for this related party agreement.

In conjunction with the December 31, 2012 acquisition of 4Warranty, the Company assumed an office space lease between 4Warranty and Source International Incorporated ("Source"), effective January 1, 2013. The ownership of Source is comprised of two individuals who had consulting relationships with the Company. The lease with Source, which expired on December 31, 2013, was not renewed since the operations of 4Warranty were moved to the Company's main office. The table below presents the lease payments made to Source during the three months ended March 31, 2013.

In December 2011, the Company entered into a marketing and referral agreement (the "Marketing Agreement") with a company in which a member serving on the Company's Board of Directors also serves on the board of the company providing the marketing services (the "Marketer"). The Marketing Agreement has a five year term and requires the Company to pay the Marketer a per account fee per month based on the number of enrolled customers the Marketer obtains for the Company. In conjunction with this Marketing Agreement, during April 2013, the Company entered into an agreement under which the Marketer began selling insurance-related products of the Company to the Marketer's customers. The Company recorded income and paid claims, associated with the sale of the Company's insurance-related products, for the three months ended March 31, 2014 , which are reflected in the table below.


25

FORTEGRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All Amounts in Thousands, Except Share Amounts, Per Share Amounts or Unless Otherwise Noted)


The following table presents the amounts recorded on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Income resulting from related party transactions:
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2014
 
2013
Income recorded by ProtectCELL for protection plans sold
$
307

 
$
507

Income recorded for the sale of the Company's insurance-related products under the Marketing Agreement
317

 

Total related party income recorded by the Company
$
624

 
$
507

 
 
 
 
Interest income recorded on the High Pointe note receivable
$

 
$
21

 
 
 
 
Lease expense paid to High Pointe
$
104

 
$
94

Lease expense paid to Source

 
29

Total related party lease expense
$
104

 
$
123

 
 
 
 
Commissions paid by ProtectCELL for protection plans sold
$
122

 
$
205

 
 
 
 
Claims paid on the Company's insurance-related products under the Marketing Agreement
$
23

 
$

 
 
 
 
The following table presents the amounts recorded on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets from related party transactions:
 
At
 
March 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Accounts receivable from related parties
$

 
$
113


20. Subsequent Events
The Company measures subsequent events through the date of the filing of its Consolidated Financial Statements. Management has determined that the following events merit disclosure as subsequent events:

Amended Secured Credit Agreement - Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
As disclosed on April 16, 2014, in the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, effective April 11, 2014, the Company entered into the Second Amendment to the Credit Agreement. For more information, please see the note, "Note Payable."

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") represents an overview of our results of operations and financial condition. The MD&A should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in ITEM 1 of this Form 10-Q . Except for the historical information contained herein, the discussions in MD&A contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our future results could differ materially from those discussed herein. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in PART II, "ITEM 1A. Risk Factors" of this Form 10-Q .

Critical Accounting Policies
Fortegra's critical accounting policies involving significant judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements as of March 31, 2014 are unchanged from those presented in the MD&A of Fortegra's 2013 Form 10-K.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards
For a discussion of recently issued accounting standards see the Note "Recent Accounting Standards" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in ITEM 1 of this Form 10-Q .

Components of Revenues and Expenses
For a complete discussion of our "Components of Revenues and Expenses," please see the MD&A in Part II, Item 7, of Fortegra's 2013 Form 10-K.


26


Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Management uses certain Non-GAAP financial measures in its analysis of our operating performance.  See "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Information" in this MD&A for a reconciliation of these comparable financial measures based on U.S. GAAP.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The following provides an overview of events and financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2014 :

Overview of Events
On December 31, 2012, we acquired ProtectCELL and 4Warranty. Their impact on our financial results began in 2013.

In January 2013, we announced a plan to consolidate our fulfillment, claims administration and information technology functions (the "Plan"). Prior to the Plan, such functions resided in individual business units. The decision was part of our efforts to streamline operations, focus resources and provide first-in-class service to our customers. During the first quarter of 2013, we eliminated approximately 40 employee and contract positions.

On December 31, 2013, we completed the sale of all of the issued and outstanding stock of our subsidiaries, Bliss and Glennon and eReinsure, to AmWINS (the "Disposition"). See the Note, "Divestitures" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in ITEM 1 of this Form 10-Q for additional information.

In March 2014, in the exercise of our rights as a secured creditor, we took measures to protect certain assets of CIRG, a previously unconsolidated VIE, and booked an allowance for potential non-performance of the underlying note receivable guaranteed by CIRG.

On April 11, 2014, we amended our Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., which increased our available line of credit to $100.0 million from $75.0 million, extended the maturity by two years to August 2019 and provided us with a more favorable interest rate schedule and unused line fees.

Overview of Financial Results
Our income from continuing operations before non-controlling interests for the three months ended March 31, 2014 increased $1.7 million , or 83.5% , to $3.8 million from $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 . This increase was primarily due to revenue growth, particularly in our payment protection products and ProtectCELL products, and our management of operating expenses.

For the three months ended March 31, 2014 , our total revenues increased $10.4 million , or 12.9% , to $90.5 million from $80.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 . The increase in revenues for 2014 includes organic growth of $5.2 million and $5.2 million as a result of the accounting treatment required under purchase accounting for the ProtectCELL acquisition. The organic growth is primarily attributable to increases of $3.4 million in ceding commissions and $1.8 million in net earned premium from our payment protection products, and $3.6 million of higher service and administration fees from ProtectCELL products. These increases were partially offset by a $2.7 million decrease in motor club revenues and a $1.1 million decrease in our insurance client administrative revenues.

Total expenses increased $7.2 million , or 9.2% , to $84.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 from $77.6 million for the same period in 2013 . In the current quarter, there was a $1.3 million increase in member benefit claims compared to the first quarter of 2013 due primarily to revenue growth, and a $1.3 million charge to expenses associated with the allowance established against the CIRG note receivable. In the first quarter of 2013 we incurred $1.2 million of costs associated with the Plan. In addition, total expenses increased $5.2 million as a result of the accounting treatment required under purchase accounting for the ProtectCELL acquisition, primarily in commissions.

Net revenues, a Non-GAAP measure, increased $4.1 million , or 16.3% , to $29.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 compared to $24.9 million for the same period in 2013. This increase represents the organic growth in total revenues, partially offset by corresponding increases in net losses and loss adjustment expenses and member benefit claims.

Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization ("EBITDA") from continuing operations, a Non-GAAP measure, increased $3.2 million, or 53.0%, to $9.2 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 compared to $6.0 million for the same period in 2013. The EBITDA from continuing operations margin, a Non-GAAP measure, was 31.9% for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 compared to 24.2% for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.

Net income attributable to Fortegra Financial Corporation (which includes the impact of discontinued operations) increased $0.4 million , or 16.2% , to $2.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 from $2.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 . Earnings per diluted share attributable to Fortegra Financial Corporation increased 16.7% to $0.14 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 from $0.12 for the same period in 2013 .


27


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table presents our Consolidated Statements of Income for the following periods:
(in thousands, except shares, per share amounts and percentages)
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2014
2013
$ Change from 2013
% Change from 2013
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
Service and administrative fees
$
43,968

$
38,858

$
5,110

13.2
 %
Ceding commissions
10,549

7,163

3,386

47.3

Net investment income
707

903

(196
)
(21.7
)
Net realized investment gains
1

7

(6
)
(85.7
)
Net earned premium
34,928

33,142

1,786

5.4

Other income
375

91

284

312.1

Total revenues
90,528

80,164

10,364

12.9

Expenses:
 
 
 
 
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses
10,826

10,535

291

2.8

Member benefit claims
10,671

9,366

1,305

13.9

Commissions
40,071

35,362

4,709

13.3

Personnel costs
10,191

10,797

(606
)
(5.6
)
Other operating expenses
8,225

8,075

150

1.9

Depreciation and amortization
1,249

1,177

72

6.1

Amortization of intangibles
1,317

1,468

(151
)
(10.3
)
Interest expense
920

853

67

7.9

Loss on note receivable
1,317


1,317

100.0

Total expenses
84,787

77,633

7,154

9.2

Income from continuing operations before income taxes
5,741

2,531

3,210

126.8

Income taxes - continuing operations
1,982

482

1,500

311.2

Income from continuing operations before non-controlling interests
3,759

2,049

1,710

83.5

Discontinued operations:
 
 
 
 
Income from discontinued operations - net of tax

1,262

(1,262
)
(100.0
)
Discontinued operations - net of tax

1,262

(1,262
)
(100.0
)
Net income before non-controlling interests
3,759

3,311

448

13.5

Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interests
861

818

43

5.3

Net income attributable to Fortegra Financial Corporation
$
2,898

$
2,493

$
405

16.2
 %
 
 
 
 
 
Earnings per share - Basic:
 
 
 
 
Net income from continuing operations - net of tax
$
0.15

$
0.06

 
 
Discontinued operations - net of tax

0.07

 
 
Net income attributable to Fortegra Financial Corporation
$
0.15

$
0.13

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Earnings per share - Diluted:
 
 
 
 
Net income from continuing operations - net of tax
$
0.14

$
0.06

 
 
Discontinued operations - net of tax

0.06

 
 
Net income attributable to Fortegra Financial Corporation
$
0.14

$
0.12

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
 
 
 
 
Basic
19,651,256

19,556,743

 
 
Diluted
20,436,442

20,625,041

 
 

REVENUES
Service and Administrative Fees
Service and administrative fees for the three months ended March 31, 2014 increased $5.1 million , or 13.2% , to $44.0 million  from $38.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 . The increase included $5.2 million as a result of the accounting treatment required under purchase accounting for the ProtectCELL acquisition. Organic revenue growth from our ProtectCELL products of $3.6 million was offset by decreases of $2.7 million in motor club revenues and $1.1 million in insurance client administrative revenues .

Ceding Commissions
Ceding commissions for the three months ended March 31, 2014 increased $3.4 million , or 47.3% , to $10.5 million from $7.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 . This increase primarily resulted from growth in ceded credit insurance service and administrative fees from both higher direct premium volume and increased ceding percentages on our recently amended reinsurance agreements with London Life and London International. In addition, underwriting profits increased due to favorable loss ratios in the

28


ceded credit insurance business. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 , ceding commissions included $7.6 million in service and administrative fees, $2.9 million in underwriting profits and $0.1 million in net investment income.

Net Investment Income
Net investment income for the three months ended March 31, 2014 decreased $0.2 million , or 21.7% , to $0.7 million from $0.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 . The decrease was primarily attributable to $0.1 million of investment income attributable to ProtectCELL recorded in 2013 that was not repeated in 2014, along with a decrease in the overall yield of the investment portfolio. The yield on the investment portfolio at March 31, 2014 was 1.73% compared to 2.96% at March 31, 2013 .

Net Realized Investment Gains
Net realized gains on the sale of investments and the gross proceeds from the sales of investments were insignificant to our results of operations for both the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.

Net Earned Premium
Net earned premium for the three months ended March 31, 2014 increased $1.8 million , or 5.4% , to $34.9 million from $33.1 million for  the three months ended March 31, 2013 . This increase was primarily due to growth in direct and assumed earned premium of $16.4 million resulting from increased production from existing and new clients distributing our credit insurance, warranty, and auto products, and from geographic expansion. Because of this increase in production and the increased ceding percentages on our reinsurance program with London Life and London International, ceded earned premiums increased $14.6 million , or 24.7% , for the three months ended March 31, 2014 . On average, we maintained a 67.8% overall cession rate of direct and assumed earned premium for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared with 64.0% for the same period in 2013 .

Other Income
Other income for the three months ended March 31, 2014 increased $0.3 million , or 312.1% , to $0.4 million from $0.1 million for  the three months ended March 31, 2013 . Other income for the 2014 period includes $0.3 million of interest income from our premium- financing program for South Bay, which began late in 2013.

EXPENSES
Net Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2014 increased $0.3 million , or 2.8% , to $10.8 million , from $10.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 .  Our net losses and loss adjustment expense ratio of 31.0% in 2014 was similar to prior periods. The increase in net losses and loss adjustment expenses was primarily driven by increased earned premiums. For the 2014 period, our direct and assumed losses increased by $5.1 million , or 24.1% , as compared with the same period in 2013 . For the 2014 period, our ceded losses were higher by $4.8 million , or 45.6% , compared with the same period in 2013 , partially offsetting the increase in direct and assumed losses, which resulted predominantly from the changes in our reinsurance program with London Life and London International. The overall cession rate of direct and assumed losses and loss adjustment expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2014 increased to 58.5% , from 49.9% for the same period in 2013, with the increase primarily attributable to the change in the reinsurance program noted above.

Member Benefit Claims
Member benefit claims for the three months ended March 31, 2014 increased $1.3 million , or 13.9% , to $10.7 million , from $9.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 . This increase resulted principally from a $1.1 million increase in ProtectCELL member benefits claims, correlated to organic growth in related revenues.

Commissions
Commissions for the three months ended March 31, 2014 increased $4.7 million , or 13.3% , to $40.1 million , from $35.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 . The increase included $4.8 million as a result of the accounting treatment required under purchase accounting for the ProtectCELL acquisition. Increases of $0.6 million due to ProtectCELL organic revenue growth, and $1.5 million due to growth in credit insurance production were offset by a decrease of $2.5 million in motor club commissions resulting from the decrease in motor club revenues.

Personnel Costs
Personnel costs for the three months ended March 31, 2014 decreased $0.6 million , or 5.6% , to $10.2 million from $10.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 . The 2013 amount included $1.2 million in non-recurring costs associated with the Plan. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 , compared to 2013, personnel costs of ProtectCELL increased $0.9 million as a result of adding staff during 2013 to support growth. These higher costs were partially offset by savings in other areas. We employed a total of 500 people at March 31, 2014 compared to 457 at March 31, 2013 . Stock-based compensation expense included in personnel costs totaled $0.2 million for both the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 .


29


Other Operating Expenses
Other operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2014 increased $0.2 million , or only 1.9% , to $8.2 million from $8.1 million for  the three months ended March 31, 2013 . .

Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2014 increased $72.0 thousand , or 6.1% , to $1.2 million compared to  the three months ended March 31, 2013 , due to higher levels of depreciable and amortizable assets in service during 2014 compared to the same period in 2013.

Amortization of Intangibles
Amortization expense on intangibles for the three months ended March 31, 2014 decreased $0.2 million or 10.3% to $1.3 million from $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 due to a lower level of amortizable intangible assets in the 2014 period compared to the same period in 2013.

Interest Expense
Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2014 increased $67.0 thousand , or 7.9% , compared to  the three months ended March 31, 2013 . The increase in 2014 was attributable to the additional interest expense incurred on borrowings under our line of credit with Synovus supporting our premium receivable product.

Loss on Note Receivable
For the three months ended March 31, 2014 , we recorded a $1.3 million loss resulting from establishing the allowance against the CIRG note receivable, which we entered into in connection with the sale of CIRG in July of 2011.

Income Taxes
Income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2014 increased $1.5 million , or 311.2% , to $2.0 million from $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 , with the increase primarily attributable to a higher level of pretax income and a lower level of tax preference items in 2014 compared to 2013. Our effective tax rate was 34.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to 19.0% for the same period in 2013 . The higher rate for the 2014 period was attributable to the lower amount of tax preference items in the period, compared to 2013, which increased the amount of overall income taxes. See the Note, "Income Taxes" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in ITEM 1 of this Form 10-Q for additional information and a reconciliation of the items impacting our income taxes and our effective tax rate.

Divestitures - Discontinued Operations
On December 31, 2013, we completed the previously announced sale of all of the issued and outstanding stock of our subsidiaries, Bliss and Glennon and eReinsure.com, to AmWINS, pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement. As consideration for the Disposition, we received net cash proceeds of $81.8 million , representing gross proceeds of $83.5 million less $1.0 million in transaction fees paid at the time of closing and $0.7 million of cash held by the disposed entities. We utilized the cash proceeds received on December 31, 2013 to pay off our existing credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Due to the Disposition, we no longer operate in the businesses of wholesale insurance brokerage and selling or licensing of a computerized system or platform for the negotiation and/or placement of facultative reinsurance. The following table presents the amounts related to discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Income:
(in thousands)
For the Three Months Ended
 
March 31, 2013
Income from discontinued operations:
 
Revenues:
 
Brokerage commissions and fees
$
9,731

Net investment income
6

Total revenues
9,737

Expenses:
 
Personnel costs
5,049

Other operating expenses
1,342

Depreciation and amortization
141

Amortization of intangibles
480

Interest expense
591

Total expenses
7,603

Income from discontinued operations before income taxes
2,134

Income taxes - discontinued operations
872

Discontinued operations - net of tax
$
1,262


30



See the Notes, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Discontinued Operations" and "Divestitures" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in ITEM 1 of this Form 10-Q for additional information.

USE OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL INFORMATION
We present certain additional financial measures related to our business that are "Non-GAAP measures" within the meaning of Item 10 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1934. We present these Non-GAAP measures to provide investors with additional information to analyze our performance from period to period.  Management also uses these measures to assess performance and to allocate resources in managing our businesses.  However, investors should not consider these Non-GAAP measures as a substitute for the financial information that we report in accordance with U.S. GAAP.  These Non-GAAP measures reflect subjective determinations by management, and may differ from similarly titled Non-GAAP measures presented by other companies.

In this Form 10-Q , we present Net revenues, Operating expenses, and EBITDA from continuing operations and Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations. These financial measures are considered Non-GAAP financial measures and are not recognized terms under U.S. GAAP and should not be used as an indicator of, and are not an alternative to, net income as a measure of operating performance. Net revenues are total revenues less net losses and loss adjustment expenses, member benefit claims, and commission expenses. Operating expenses are the sum of personnel costs and other operating expenses. EBITDA is net income before interest expense, income taxes, net income attributable to non-controlling interests, depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations means "Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA" which is defined under our credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., which in general terms means consolidated net income before non-controlling interests, consolidated interest expense, consolidated amortization expense, consolidated depreciation expense and consolidated income tax expense, relating to continuing operations. The other items excluded in this calculation may include if applicable, but are not limited to, specified acquisition costs, impairment of goodwill and other non-cash charges, stock-based compensation expense, and unusual or non-recurring charges and items that affect comparability of results. The calculations below do not give effect to certain additional adjustments permitted under our credit facility, which if included, would increase the amount of Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations reflected in the table. We believe presenting EBITDA from continuing operations and Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations provides investors with supplemental financial measures of our operating performance.

In addition to the financial covenant requirements under our credit facility, management uses Net revenues, Operating expenses, EBITDA from continuing operations and Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations as financial measures of operating performance for planning purposes, which may include, but are not limited to, the preparation of budgets and projections, the determination of bonus compensation for executive officers, the analysis of the allocation of resources and the evaluation of the effectiveness of business strategies. We use Net revenues as another means of understanding product contributions to our results. We use Operating expenses to reconcile from Net revenues to EBITDA. Although we use EBITDA from continuing operations and Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations as financial measures to assess the operating performance of our business, both measures have significant limitations as analytical tools because they exclude certain material expenses. For example, they do not include interest expense and the payment of income taxes, which are both a necessary element of our costs and operations. Since we use property and equipment to generate service revenues, depreciation expense is a necessary element of our costs. In addition, the omission of amortization expense associated with our intangible assets further limits the usefulness of these financial measures. Management believes the inclusion of the adjustments to EBITDA from continuing operations and Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations are appropriate to provide additional information to investors about certain material non-cash items and about unusual items that we do not expect to continue at the same level in the future. Because EBITDA from continuing operations and Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations do not account for these expenses, its utility as a financial measure of our operating performance has material limitations. Due to these limitations, management does not view EBITDA from continuing operations and Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations in isolation or as primary financial performance measures.

We believe EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of similar companies in similar industries and to measure a company's ability to service its debt and other cash needs. Because the definitions of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA (or similar financial measures) may vary among companies and industries, they may not be comparable to other similarly titled financial measures used by other companies.


31


The following table presents a reconciliation of the components of net revenues for the following periods:
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2014
 
2013
Total revenues
90,528

 
80,164

Less :
 
 
 
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses
10,826

 
10,535

Member benefit claims
10,671

 
9,366

Commissions
40,071

 
35,362

Net Revenues
$
28,960

 
$
24,901


The following table presents a reconciliation of the components of operating expenses for the following periods:
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2014
 
2013
Personnel costs
10,191

 
10,797

Other operating expenses
8,225

 
8,075

Operating expenses
$
18,416

 
$
18,872


The following table presents a reconciliation of income from continuing operations before non-controlling interests to EBITDA from continuing operations and Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations for the following periods:
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
(in thousands)
2014
 
2013
Income from continuing operations before non-controlling interests
$
3,759

 
$
2,049

Depreciation
1,249

 
1,177

Amortization of intangibles
1,317

 
1,468

Interest expense
920

 
853

Income taxes
1,982

 
482

EBITDA from continuing operations
9,227

 
6,029

Transaction costs (1)
10

 
86

Restructuring expenses

 
1,154

Stock-based compensation expense
290

 
304

Loss on note receivable
1,317

 

Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations
$
10,844

 
$
7,573

 
 
 
 
EBITDA from continuing operations margin (2)
31.9
%
 
24.2
%
Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations margin (3)
37.4
%
 
30.4
%
 
 
 
 
(1) Represents transaction costs associated with acquisitions.
 
 
 
(2) EBITDA from continuing operations margin is calculated by dividing EBITDA from continuing operations by Net Revenues.
 
 
 
(3)  Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations margin is calculated by dividing Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations by Net Revenues.
 
 
 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity
Liquidity describes the ability of a company to generate sufficient cash flows to meet the cash requirements of its business operations, including working capital needs, capital expenditures, debt service, acquisitions and other commitments and contractual obligations. We historically have derived our liquidity from our invested assets, cash flows from operations, ordinary and extraordinary dividend capacity from our subsidiary insurance companies and our credit facilities. When considering our liquidity, it is important to note that our restricted cash is held in a fiduciary capacity and is available only to satisfy certain future cash payment obligations that are recorded as liabilities.

Our primary cash requirements include the payment of operating expenses, interest and principal payments on debt, capital expenditures and acquisitions. We may also incur unexpected costs and operating expenses related to any unforeseen disruptions to our facilities and equipment, the loss of key personnel or changes in the credit markets and interest rates, which could increase our immediate cash requirements or otherwise impact our liquidity.

32



Our primary sources of liquidity include our total investments, cash and cash equivalent balances, availability under our revolving credit facilities and dividends and other distributions from our subsidiaries. At March 31, 2014 , we had total available-for-sale and short-term investments of $143.3 million , which included restricted investments of $15.9 million . In addition, we had $11.0 million of cash and cash equivalents, and $101.8 million of available capacity on our credit facilities, which includes the additional $25.0 million of capacity discussed below in the section " $100.0 million Secured Credit Agreement - Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. " At December 31, 2013 , we had total investments of $138.8 million , which included restricted investments of $16.5 million . In addition, we had cash and cash equivalents of $21.7 million and $86.7 million of available capacity on our credit facilities. Our total indebtedness was $48.2 million at March 31, 2014 compared to $38.3 million at December 31, 2013 .

We believe that our cash flows from operations and the availability under our credit facilities, combined with our low capital expenditure requirements will provide us with sufficient capital to continue to grow our business over the next several years, although we cannot give any assurances. We intend to use a portion of our available cash flows to pay interest on our outstanding debt, thus limiting the amount available for working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes. If we continue to expand our business and make acquisitions, we may in the future require additional working capital to meet our future business needs. This additional working capital may be in the form of additional debt or equity. Although we believe we have sufficient liquidity under our credit facilities, as discussed above, under adverse market conditions or in the event of a default under our credit facilities, there can be no assurance that such funds would be available or sufficient, and, in such a case, we may not be able to successfully obtain additional financing on f avorable terms, or at all, or replace our existing credit facilities upon their respective maturity dates.

C ash Exceeding Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") Limits
We maintain cash and cash equivalents with major third party financial institutions, including interest-bearing money market accounts. In the United States, these accounts were fully insured by the FDIC regardless of account balance through the Transaction Account Guarantee ("TAG") program created by Section 343 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ("Dodd-Frank Act"). The expiration of the TAG program on December 31, 2012 caused the FDIC's standard insurance limit of $250,000 per depositor per institution to be reimposed on January 1, 2013. Thus, our accounts containing cash and cash equivalents after January 1, 2013 may exceed the FDIC's standard $250,000 insurance limit from time to time.

Our cash balances, including restricted cash, exceeding the FDIC standard insurance limit totaled $10.0 million at March 31, 2014 and $18.9 million at December 31, 2013 . To date, we have not experienced any loss of, or lack of access to, our cash and cash equivalents or our restricted cash. Although we periodically monitor and adjust the balances of these accounts as needed, the balances of these accounts nonetheless remain subject to unexpected, adverse conditions in the financial markets and could be adversely impacted if a financial institution with which we maintain an account fails. We will continue to monitor the depository institutions at which our accounts are maintained, but cannot guarantee that access to our cash and cash equivalents will not be impacted by, or that we will not lose deposited funds exceeding the FDIC standard insurance limit due to, adverse conditions in the financial markets or if a financial institution with which we maintain an account fails.

Share Repurchase Plan
We have a share repurchase plan which allows us to purchase up to $15.0 million in total of our common stock from time to time through open market or private transactions. We did not repurchase any common shares during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. At March 31, 2014 , we had $7.2 million still available for repurchase under the plan. See PART II, ITEM 2 included in this Form 10-Q , for more information on our share repurchase plan.

Regulatory Requirements  
Dividends Limitations
We are a holding company and have limited direct operations. Our holding company assets consist primarily of the capital stock of our subsidiaries. Accordingly, our future cash flows depend upon the availability of dividends and other payments from our subsidiaries, including statutorily permissible payments from our insurance company subsidiaries, as well as payments under our tax allocation agreement and management agreements with our subsidiaries. The following table sets forth the dividends paid to us by our insurance company subsidiaries during the following periods:
 
 
For the Three Months Ended
 
For the Twelve Months Ended
(in thousands)
March 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Ordinary dividends
$

 
$
2,383

Extraordinary dividends

 

Total dividends
$

 
$
2,383



33


Please see the Note, "Statutory Reporting and Insurance Company Subsidiaries Dividend Restrictions" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in ITEM 1 of this Form 10-Q , for additional information.

$100.0 million Secured Credit Agreement - Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
In April 2014, we amended the original credit agreement, entered into on August 2, 2012, (as amended, the "Credit Agreement"), with a syndicate of lenders, among them Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., who also serves as administrative agent ("Wells Fargo" or the "Administrative Agent"). The Credit Agreement provides for an extended maturity to August 2, 2019 (subject to earlier termination) and an increased revolving credit facility of $100.0 million (the "Revolving Facility") with a sub-limit of $10.0 million for swingline loans and $10.0 million for letters of credit. The Credit Agreement includes a provision pursuant to which, from time to time, we may request that the lenders in their discretion increase the maximum amount of commitments under the Facilities by an amount not to exceed $50.0 million. The Credit Agreement also contains financial covenants, which we must maintain. The amendment to the Credit Agreement also serves to (1) reduce the interest rate margin on revolving loans by 0.35% for each pricing level and (2) reduce the unused line fee paid on undrawn revolving commitments by 0.05% for each pricing level.

As of March 31, 2014 , we were in compliance with the financial covenants contained in the Credit Agreement. Please see the Note, "Notes Payable" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in ITEM 1 of this Form 10-Q , for additional information on the Credit Agreement.

$15.0 million Revolving Line of Credit - Synovus Bank
At March 31, 2014 , South Bay had a $15.0 million line of credit agreement (the "Line of Credit") with Synovus Bank, entered into on October 2013, with a maturity date of April 2017. The Line of Credit bears interest at a rate of 300 basis points plus the 90-day LIBOR. South Bay uses the Line of Credit for its premium-financing product. The Line of Credit allows South Bay to finance up to 90% of the eligible receivables less an applicable reserve of $500,000. At March 31, 2014 , the balance of premium-financing receivables included in notes receivable, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, totaled $9.8 million , and the balance of the Line of Credit included in notes payable on the Consolidated Balance Sheet was $6.1 million .

Preferred Trust Securities
In connection with the Summit Partners Transactions, our subsidiary LOTS Intermediate Co. issued $35.0 million of fixed/floating rate preferred trust securities due in 2037. The preferred trust securities accrued interest at a rate of 9.61% per annum until the June 2012 interest payment date; thereafter, interest accrues at a rate of 3-month LIBOR plus 4.10% for each interest rate period. Interest due on the preferred trust securities is payable quarterly. We may redeem the preferred trust securities, in whole or in part, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of such preferred trust securities outstanding plus accrued and unpaid interest.

At March 31, 2014 , we have a single interest rate swap (the "Swap") designated as a cash flow hedge with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. This instrument swapped the floating rate portion of our $35.0 million in outstanding preferred trust securities to a fixed rate of 3.47% per annum payable quarterly resulting in a total rate of 7.57% after adding the applicable margin of 4.10%. The Swap has a five year term, which commenced in June 2012 when the interest rate on the underlying preferred trust securities began to float, and will expire in June 2017. Please see the Note, "Derivative Financial Instruments - Interest Rate Swap" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in ITEM 1 of this Form 10-Q , for additional information.

Invested Assets
Our invested assets consist mainly of high quality investments in fixed maturity securities, short-term investments, and a smaller allocation of common and preferred equity securities. We believe that prudent levels of investments in equity securities within our investment portfolio are likely to enhance long-term after-tax total returns without significantly increasing the risk profile of the portfolio. We regularly review our entire portfolio in the context of macroeconomic and capital market conditions. The overall credit quality of the investment portfolio was rated AA- by Standard and Poor's Rating Service at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 , respectively.

Regulatory Requirements
Our investments must comply with applicable laws and regulations, which prescribe the kind, quality and concentration of investments we are permitted to make. In general, these laws and regulations permit investments, within specified limits and subject to certain qualifications, in federal, state and municipal obligations, corporate bonds, preferred and common equity securities, mortgage loans, real estate and other investments.

Investment Strategy
Our investment policy and strategy is reviewed and approved by the board of directors of each of our insurance company subsidiaries on a regular basis in order to review and consider investment activities, tactics and new investment opportunities. Our investment strategy seeks long-term returns through disciplined security selection, portfolio diversity and an integrated approach to risk management. We select and monitor investments to balance the goals of safety, stability, liquidity, growth and after-tax total return with the need to comply with regulatory investment requirements. Our investment portfolio is managed by a third-party provider of

34


asset management services, which specializes in the insurance sector. Asset/liability management is accomplished by setting an asset target duration range that is influenced by the following factors: (i) the estimated reserve payout pattern, (ii) the inclusion of our tactical capital market views into the investment decision-making process and (iii) our overall risk tolerance. We aim to achieve a relatively safe and stable income stream by maintaining a broad-based portfolio of investment grade fixed maturity securities. These holdings are supplemented by investments in additional asset types with the objective of further enhancing the portfolio's diversification and expected returns. These additional asset types include common and redeemable preferred stock. We manage our investment risks through consideration of duration of liabilities, diversification, credit limits, careful analytic review of each investment decision, and comprehensive risk assessments of the overall portfolio.

As of March 31, 2014 , we held 133 individual fixed maturity and 10 individual equity securities in unrealized loss positions. As of March 31, 2013 , we held 39 individual fixed maturity and three individual equity securities in unrealized loss positions. The increase in the number of fixed maturity securities in unrealized loss positions was primarily due to changes in bond yields and the related impact on market prices. We do not intend to sell the investments that were in an unrealized loss position at March 31, 2014 and we believe that it is more likely than not that we will be able to hold these securities until full recovery of their amortized cost basis for fixed maturity securities or cost for equity securities, although we can give no assurances.

At March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013 , respectively, based on management's quarterly review, none of our fixed maturity or equity securities were deemed to be other than temporarily impaired. Please see the Note, "Investments" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q, for additional information.

Cash Flows
We monitor cash flows at the consolidated, holding company, and subsidiary levels on a monthly basis, using trend and variance analysis to project future cash needs, with adjustments made as needed. The following table presents our consolidated cash flows:
(in thousands)
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
Cash provided by (used in):
2014
 
2013
Operating activities
$
(9,891
)
 
$
(1,295
)
Investing activities
(10,020
)
 
(1,844
)
Financing activities
9,204

 
2,269

Net change in cash and cash equivalents
$
(10,707
)
 
$
(870
)

Our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2013 includes the cash flows from Bliss and Glennon and eReinsure. Our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2013 reflect Bliss and Glennon and eReinsure as discontinued operations.

Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities was $9.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 . The increase was primarily attributable to the payments of discontinued operations liabilities. Also affecting this increase were the payment of taxes and payments associated with other assets.

Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $10.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $1.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 . The increase in net cash used in investing activities was primarily attributable to issuance of additional notes receivable, net of collections, under the South Bay premium financing program, and the cash proceeds received in the prior year quarter for payoff of the $6.1 million related party note receivable, which was not repeated in 2014. In addition, during 2014, there was a lower level of net cash used in net investment portfolio activity, compared to the same period in 2013.

Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $9.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $2.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 . The increase in 2014 primarily reflected a greater change in the utilization of our credit facilities during the quarter, compared to the prior year quarter. The increase in 2014 was partially offset by distributions to the non-controlling interest partners at ProtectCELL, which did not occur in the 2013 period.
 
Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments
We have obligations and commitments to third parties as a result of our operations. Our contractual obligations and commitments, as of March 31, 2014 , have not changed materially from those disclosed in our 2013 Form 10-K. For a discussion of our contractual obligations and other commitments, please see Part II, Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," contained in our 2013 Form 10-K.


35


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our markets risks, as of March 31, 2014 , have not changed materially from those disclosed in our 2013 Form 10-K. For a discussion of our exposure to market risk, please see Part II, Item 7A. "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk," contained our 2013 Form 10-K.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), as of March 31, 2014 . Based on this evaluation, management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2014 .

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, identified no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2014 , that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitations of Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and internal controls will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within Fortegra have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple errors or mistakes. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by our management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. There can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, a control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certifications
Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 are the Certifications of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, required in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Section 302 Certifications"). The "Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures" in this ITEM 4 is the "Evaluation" referred to in the Section 302 Certifications, and accordingly, the above information should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 Certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The information set forth in the "Contingencies" section of the Note, "Commitments and Contingencies" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in ITEM 1 of this Form 10-Q is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The following are certain risks that management believes are specific to our business. This should not be viewed as an all-inclusive list of risks or as a presentation of the risk factors in any particular order. You should carefully consider the risks described below, together with the other information contained in this Form 10-Q and in our other filings with the SEC when evaluating our Company. Should any of the events discussed in the risk factors below occur, our business, results of operations or financial condition could be materially affected. Additional risks unknown at this time, or risks we currently deem immaterial, may also impact our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

36



Risks Related to our Business and Industries
General economic and financial market conditions may have a material adverse effect on the business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition of our business.
General economic and financial market conditions, including the availability and cost of credit, the loss of consumer confidence, reduction in consumer or business spending, inflation, unemployment, energy costs and geopolitical issues, have contributed to increased uncertainty and volatility as well as diminished expectations for the U.S. economy and the financial markets. These conditions could materially and adversely affect our business. Adverse economic and financial market conditions could result in:
a reduction in the demand for, and availability of, consumer credit, which could result in reduced demand by consumers for our products and our clients opting to no longer make such products available;
higher than anticipated loss ratios on our products due to rising unemployment or disability claims;
higher risk of increased fraudulent claims;
individuals terminating loans or canceling credit insurance policies, thereby reducing our revenues;
a reduction in the demand for consumer warranty service contracts, service contract offerings, mobile device protection and motor club memberships;
individuals terminating warranty service contracts, service contracts, mobile device protection contracts or motor club memberships, thereby reducing our revenues;
our clients being more likely to experience financial distress or declare bankruptcy or liquidation, which could have an adverse impact on demand for our services and products and the remittance of premiums from such customers, as well as the collection of receivables from such clients for items such as unearned premiums, commissions or related accounts receivable, which could make the collection of receivables from our clients more difficult;
increased pricing sensitivity or reduced demand for our services and products;
increased costs associated with, or the inability to obtain, debt financing to fund acquisitions or the expansion of our business; and
defaults in our fixed income investment portfolio or lower than anticipated rates of return as a result of low interest rate environments.

If we are unable to successfully anticipate changing economic or financial market conditions, we may be unable to effectively plan for or respond to such changes, and our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.
 
We face significant competitive pressures in our business, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Competition in our business is based on many factors, including price, industry knowledge, quality of client service, our ability to efficiently administer claims, the effectiveness of our sales force, technology platforms and processes, the security and integrity of our information systems, the financial strength ratings of our insurance company subsidiaries, office locations, breadth of services and products and brand recognition and reputation. Some competitors may offer a broader array of services and products, may have a greater diversity of distribution resources, may have better brand recognition, may have lower cost structures or, with respect to insurers, may have higher financial strength or claims paying ratings. Some competitors also have larger client bases than we do. In addition, new competitors could enter our markets in the future, and existing competitors may gain strength by forging new business relationships. The competitive landscape in which our business operates is described below.

We compete with insurance companies, financial institutions, extended service plan providers, membership plan providers, wireless carriers and other insurance and warranty service providers. Our principal competitors include The Warranty Group, American National Insurance Company, Assurant, Inc., Asurion Corporation, eSecuritel Holdings, LLC, Global Warranty Group, LLC, Securian Financial Group, The Plateau Group, Inc. and smaller regional companies. As a result of state and federal regulatory developments and changes in prior years, certain financial institutions are able to offer debt cancellation plans and are also able to affiliate with other insurance companies in order to offer services similar to ours. This has resulted in new competitors, some of whom have significant financial resources, entering some of our markets. As competitors gain experience with payment protection and warranty programs, their reliance on our services and products may diminish.

We expect competition to intensify, which may result in lower prices and volumes, higher personnel and sales and marketing costs, increased technology expenditures and lower profitability. We may not be able to supply clients with services or products that they deem superior and at competitive prices and we may lose business to our competitors. If we are unable to compete effectively, it would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
 
Our results of operations may fluctuate significantly, which makes our future results of operations difficult to predict. If our results of operations fall below expectations, the price of our common stock could decline.
Our annual and quarterly results of operations have fluctuated in the past and may fluctuate significantly in the future due to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, our expenses as a percentage of revenues may be significantly different

37


than our historical rates. As a result, comparing our results of operations on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful. Factors that may cause our results of operations to fluctuate from period-to-period include:
demand for our services and products;
the length of our sales cycle;
the amount of sales to new clients;
the timing of implementations of our services and products with new clients;
seasonality;
the timing of acquisitions;
competitive factors;
prevailing interest rates;
pricing changes by us or our competitors;
transaction volumes in our clients' businesses;
the introduction of new services and products by us and our competitors;
changes in strategic partnerships;
changes in regulatory and accounting standards; and
our ability to control costs.

In addition, our revenues may vary depending on the level of consumer activity and the success of our clients in selling products.

Our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected if we fail to retain our existing clients, cannot sell additional services and products to our existing clients, do not introduce new or enhanced services and products or are not able to attract and retain new clients.
Our revenue and revenue growth are dependent on our ability to retain clients, to sell those clients additional services and products, to introduce new services and products and to attract new clients. Our ability to increase revenues will depend on a variety of factors, including:
the quality and perceived value of our product and service offerings by existing and prospective clients;
the effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts;
the successful installation and implementation of our services and products for new and existing clients;
availability of capital to complete investments in new or complementary products, services and technologies;
the availability of adequate reinsurance for us and our clients, including the ability of our clients to form, capitalize and operate captive reinsurance companies;
our ability to find suitable acquisition candidates, successfully complete such acquisitions and effectively integrate such acquisitions;
our ability to integrate technology into our services and products to avoid obsolescence and provide scalability;
the reliability, execution and accuracy of our services; and
client willingness to accept any price increases for our services and products.

In addition, we are subject to risks of losing clients due to consolidation in the markets we serve. Our inability to retain existing clients, sell additional services and products, or successfully develop and implement new and enhanced services and products and attract new clients, and accordingly, increase our revenues, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

We typically face a long selling cycle to secure new clients as well as long implementation periods that require significant resource commitments, which result in a long lead time before we receive revenues from new client relationships.
The industries in which we compete generally consist of mature businesses and markets and the companies that participate in these industries have well-established business operations, systems and relationships. Accordingly, our business typically faces a long selling cycle to secure a new client. Even if we are successful in obtaining a new client engagement, it is generally followed by a long implementation period in which the services are planned in detail and we demonstrate to the client that we can successfully integrate our processes and resources with their operations. We also typically negotiate and enter into a contractual relationship with the new client during this period. There is then a long implementation period in order to commence providing the services.
 
We typically incur significant business development expenses during the selling cycle. We may not succeed in winning a new client's business, in which case we receive no revenues and may receive no reimbursement for such expenses. Even if we succeed in developing a relationship with a potential client and begin to plan the services in detail, such potential client may choose a competitor or decide to retain the work in-house prior to the time a final contract is signed. If we enter into a contract with a client, we will typically receive no revenues until implementation actually begins. In addition, a significant portion of our revenue is based upon the success of our clients' marketing programs, which may not generate the transaction volume we anticipate. Our clients may also experience delays in obtaining internal approvals or delays associated with technology or system implementations, thereby further lengthening the implementation cycle. If we are not successful in obtaining contractual commitments after the selling cycle, in maintaining contractual commitments after the implementation cycle or in maintaining or reducing the duration of unprofitable initial periods in our contracts, it may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, the time and effort

38


required to complete the implementation phases of new contracts makes it difficult to accurately predict the timing of revenues from new clients as well as our costs.
 
Acquisitions are a significant part of our growth strategy and we may not be successful in identifying suitable acquisition candidates, completing such acquisitions or integrating the acquired businesses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and growth.
Historically, acquisitions have played a significant role in our expansion into new markets and in the growth of some of our operations. Acquiring complementary businesses is a significant component of our growth strategy. Accordingly, we frequently evaluate possible acquisition targets for our business. However, we may not be able to identify suitable acquisitions, and such transactions may not be able to be financed and completed on acceptable terms. We may incur significant expenses in evaluating and completing such acquisitions. Furthermore, any future acquisitions may not be successful. In addition, we may be competing with larger competitors with substantially greater resources for acquisition targets. Any deficiencies in the process of integrating companies we may acquire could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. Acquisitions entail a number of risks including, among other things:
failure to achieve anticipated revenues, earnings or cash flows;
increased expenses;
diversion of management time and attention;
failure to retain the acquired business' customers or personnel;
difficulties in realizing projected efficiencies;
ability to realize synergies and cost savings;
difficulties in integrating systems and personnel; and
inaccurate assessment of liabilities.

Our failure to adequately address these acquisition risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and growth. Future acquisitions may reduce our cash resources available to fund our operations and capital expenditures and could result in increased amortization expense related to any intangible assets acquired, potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities or the incurrence of debt, which could increase our interest expense.

We may lose clients or business as a result of consolidation within the financial services industry.
There has been considerable consolidation in the financial services industry, driven primarily by the acquisition of small and mid-size organizations by larger entities. We expect this trend to continue. We may lose business or suffer decreased revenues if one or more of our significant clients or distributors consolidate or align themselves with other companies. To date, our business has not been materially affected by consolidation. However, we may be affected by industry consolidation that occurs in the future, particularly if any of our significant clients are acquired by organizations that already possess the operations, services and products that we provide.

Our ability to implement and execute our strategic plans may not be successful and, accordingly, we may not be successful in achieving our strategic goals, which may materially and adversely affect our business.
We may not be successful in developing and implementing our strategic plans for our business or the operational plans that have been or need to be developed to implement these strategic plans. If the development or implementation of such plans is not successful, we may not produce the revenue, margins, earnings or synergies that we need to be successful. We may also face delays or difficulties in implementing service, product, process and system improvements, which could adversely affect the timing or effectiveness of margin improvement efforts in our business and our ability to successfully compete in the markets we serve. The execution of our strategic and operating plans will, to some extent, also be dependent on external factors that we cannot control. In addition, these strategic and operational plans need to continue to be assessed and reassessed to meet the challenges and needs of our business in order for us to remain competitive. The failure to implement and execute our strategic and operating plans in a timely manner or at all, realize the cost savings or other benefits or improvements associated with such plans, have financial resources to fund the costs associated with such plans or incur costs in excess of anticipated amounts, or sufficiently assess and reassess these plans could have a material and adverse effect on our business or results of operations.
 
We may not effectively manage our growth, which could materially harm our business.
The growth of our business has placed and may continue to place significant demands on our management, personnel, systems and resources. To manage our growth, we must continue to improve our operational and financial systems and managerial controls and procedures, and we will need to continue to expand, train and manage our personnel. We must also maintain close coordination among our technology, compliance, legal, risk management, accounting, finance, marketing and sales organizations. We may not manage our growth effectively, and if we fail to do so, our business could be materially and adversely harmed.
 
If we continue to grow, we may be required to increase our investment in facilities, personnel and financial and management systems and controls. Continued growth, especially in connection with expansion into new business lines, may also require expansion of our procedures for monitoring and assuring our compliance with applicable regulations and that we recruit, integrate, train and manage a growing employee base. The expansion of our existing business, our expansion into new businesses and the resulting growth of our employee base increase our need for internal audit and monitoring processes that are more extensive and broader in scope than those

39


we have historically required. We may not be successful in implementing all of the processes that are necessary. Further, unless our growth results in an increase in our revenues that is proportionate to the increase in our costs associated with this growth, our operating margins and profitability will be materially and adversely affected.
 
As a holding company, we depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to transfer funds to us to pay dividends and to meet our obligations.
We act as a holding company for our subsidiaries and do not have any significant operations of our own. Dividends from our subsidiaries are our principal sources of cash to meet our obligations and pay dividends, if any, on our common stock. These obligations include our operating expenses and interest and principal payments on our current and any future borrowings. The agreements governing our credit facilities restrict our subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends or otherwise transfer cash to us. Under our credit facility, our subsidiaries are permitted to make distributions to us if no default or event of default has occurred and is continuing at the time of such distribution. If the cash we receive from our subsidiaries pursuant to dividends or otherwise is insufficient for us to fund any of these obligations, or if a subsidiary is unable to pay dividends to us, we may be required to raise cash through the incurrence of additional debt, the issuance of additional equity or the sale of assets.
 
The payment of dividends and other distributions to us by each of the regulated insurance company subsidiaries is regulated by insurance laws and regulations of the states in which they operate. In general, dividends in excess of prescribed limits are deemed "extraordinary" and require insurance regulatory approval. Ordinary dividends, for which no regulatory approval is generally required, are limited to amounts determined by a formula, which varies by state. Some states have an additional stipulation that dividends may only be paid out of earned surplus. States also regulate transactions between our insurance company subsidiaries and our other subsidiaries, such as those relating to the shared services, and in some instances, require prior approval of such transactions within the holding company structure. If insurance regulators determine that payment of an ordinary dividend or any other payments by our insurance company subsidiaries to us (such as payments for employee or other services) would be adverse to policyholders or creditors, the regulators may block or otherwise restrict such payments that would otherwise be permitted without prior approval. In addition, there could be future regulatory actions restricting the ability of our insurance company subsidiaries to pay dividends or share services. Please see the Note, "Statutory Reporting and Insurance Company Subsidiaries Dividend Restrictions," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in ITEM 1 of this Form 10-Q for additional information relating to dividend restrictions for our insurance company subsidiaries.
 
Our success is dependent upon the retention and acquisition of talented people and the skills and abilities of our management team and key personnel.
Our business depends on the efforts, abilities and expertise of our senior executives, particularly our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Richard S. Kahlbaugh, and our other key personnel. Mr. Kahlbaugh and our other senior executives are important to our success because they have been instrumental in setting our strategic direction, operating our business, identifying, recruiting and training key personnel, maintaining relationships with our clients, and identifying business opportunities. The loss of one or more of these executives or other key individuals could impair our business and development until qualified replacements are found. We may not be able to replace these individuals quickly or with persons of equal experience and capabilities. Although we have employment agreements with certain of these individuals, we cannot prevent them from terminating their employment with us. In addition, our non-compete agreements with such individuals may not be enforced by the courts. We do not maintain key man life insurance policies on any of our executive officers except for Mr. Kahlbaugh. If we are unable to attract and retain talented employees, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
 
We may need to raise additional capital in the future, but there is no assurance that such capital will be available on a timely basis, on acceptable terms or at all.
We may need to raise additional funds in order to grow our business or fund our strategy or acquisitions. Additional financing may not be available in sufficient amounts or on terms acceptable to us and may be dilutive to existing stockholders if raised through additional equity offerings. A significant portion of our funding is under our existing credit facility, which matures in August 2017. Additionally, any securities issued to raise such funds may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our existing stockholders. If adequate funds are not available on a timely basis or on acceptable terms, our ability to expand, develop or enhance our services and products, enter new markets, consummate acquisitions or respond to competitive pressures could be materially limited.

Risks Related to Our Products and Services
Our products and services rely on independent financial institutions, lenders and retailers for distribution, and the loss of these distribution sources, or the failure of our distribution sources to sell our products could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
We distribute our products and services through financial institutions, lenders and retailers. Although our contracts with these clients are typically exclusive, they can be canceled on relatively short notice. In addition, the distributors typically do not have any minimum performance or sales requirements and our revenue is dependent on the level of business conducted by the distributor as well as the effectiveness of their sales efforts, each of which is beyond our control. The impairment of our distribution relationships, the loss of a significant number of our distribution relationships, the failure to establish new distribution relationships, the failure to offer increasingly competitive products, the increase in sales of competitors' services and products by these distributors or the decline in their overall business activity or the effectiveness of their sales of our products could materially reduce our sales and revenues. Also, our growth is

40


dependent in part on our ability to identify, attract and retain new distribution relationships and successfully implement our information systems with those of our new distributors.
 
Reinsurance may not be available or adequate to protect us against losses, and we are subject to the credit risk of reinsurers.
As part of our overall risk and capacity management strategy for our insurance products, we purchase reinsurance for a substantial portion of the risks underwritten through third party reinsurance companies. Market conditions beyond our control determine the availability and cost of the reinsurance protection we seek to renew or purchase. States also could impose restrictions on these reinsurance arrangements, such as requiring our insurance company subsidiaries to retain a minimum amount of underwriting risk, which could affect our profitability and results of operations. Reinsurance for certain types of catastrophes generally could become unavailable or prohibitively expensive. Such changes could substantially increase our exposure to the risk of significant losses from natural or man-made catastrophes and could hinder our ability to write future business.
 
Although the reinsurer is liable to the respective insurance company subsidiary to the extent of the ceded reinsurance, the insurance company remains liable to the insured as the direct insurer on all risks reinsured. Ceded reinsurance arrangements, therefore, do not eliminate the obligations of our insurance company subsidiaries to pay claims. While the captive reinsurance companies owned by our clients are generally required to maintain trust accounts with sufficient assets to cover the reinsurance liabilities and we manage these trust accounts on behalf of these reinsurance companies, we are subject to credit risk with respect to our ability to recover amounts due from reinsurers. The inability to collect amounts due from reinsurers could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
 
Our reinsurance facilities are generally subject to annual renewal. We may not be able to maintain our current reinsurance facilities and our clients may not be able to continue to operate their captive reinsurance companies. As a result, even where highly desirable or necessary, we may not be able to obtain other reinsurance facilities in adequate amounts and at favorable rates. If we are unable to renew our expiring facilities or to obtain or structure new reinsurance facilities, either our net exposures would increase or, if we are unwilling to bear an increase in net exposures, we may have to reduce the level of our underwriting commitments. Either of these potential developments could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Due to the structure of some of our commissions, we are exposed to risks related to the creditworthiness of some of our agents.
We are subject to the credit risk of some of the agents with which we contract to sell our products and services. We typically advance agents' commissions as part of our product offerings. These advances are a percentage of the premium charged. If we over-advance such commissions to agents, they may not be able to fulfill their payback obligations, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
 
A downgrade in the ratings of our insurance company subsidiaries may materially and adversely affect relationships with clients and adversely affect our results of operations.
Claims paying ability and financial strength ratings are each a factor in establishing the competitive position of our insurance company subsidiaries. A ratings downgrade, or the potential for such a downgrade, could, among other things, materially and adversely affect relationships with clients, brokers and other distributors of our services and products, thereby negatively impacting our results of operations, and materially and adversely affect our ability to compete in our markets. Rating agencies can be expected to continue to monitor our financial strength and claims paying ability, and no assurances can be given that future ratings downgrades will not occur, whether due to changes in our performance, changes in rating agencies' industry views or ratings methodologies, or a combination of such factors.
 
Our actual claims losses may exceed our reserves for claims, which may require us to establish additional reserves that may materially and adversely reduce our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We maintain reserves to cover our estimated ultimate exposure for claims with respect to reported claims and incurred but not reported claims as of the end of each accounting period. Reserves, whether calculated under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States or statutory accounting principles, do not represent an exact calculation of exposure. Instead, they represent our best estimates, generally involving actuarial projections, of the ultimate settlement and administration costs for a claim or group of claims, based on our assessment of facts and circumstances known at the time of calculation. The adequacy of reserves will be impacted by future trends in claims severity, frequency, judicial theories of liability and other factors. These variables are affected by external factors such as changes in the economic cycle, unemployment, changes in the social perception of the value of work, emerging medical perceptions regarding physiological or psychological causes of disability, emerging health issues, new methods of treatment or accommodation, inflation, judicial trends, legislative changes, as well as changes in claims handling procedures. Many of these items are not directly quantifiable, particularly on a prospective basis. Reserve estimates are refined as experience develops. Adjustments to reserves, both positive and negative, are reflected in the statement of income of the period in which such estimates are updated. Because the establishment of reserves is an inherently uncertain process involving estimates of future losses, we can give no assurances that ultimate losses will not exceed existing claims reserves. In general, future loss development could require reserves to be increased, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.


41


Our investment portfolio is subject to several risks that may diminish the fair value of our invested assets and cash and may materially and adversely affect our business and profitability.
Investment returns are an important part of our overall profitability and significant interest rate fluctuations, or prolonged periods of low interest rates, could impair our profitability. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary policies, domestic and international economic and political conditions and other factors beyond our control. We have a significant portion of our investments in cash and highly liquid short-term investments. Accordingly, during prolonged periods of declining or low market interest rates, such as those we have been experiencing since 2008, the interest we receive on such investments decreases and affects our profitability. In addition, certain factors affecting our business, such as volatility of claims experience, could force us to liquidate securities prior to maturity, causing us to incur capital losses. If we do not structure our investment portfolio so that it is appropriately matched with our insurance liabilities, we may be forced to liquidate investments prior to maturity at a significant loss to cover such liabilities.
 
The fair value of the fixed maturity securities in our portfolio and the investment income from these securities fluctuate depending on general economic and market conditions. Because all of our fixed maturity securities are classified as available for sale, changes in the fair value of these securities are reflected on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value generally increases or decreases in an inverse relationship with fluctuations in interest rates, while net investment income realized by us from future investments in fixed maturity securities will generally increase or decrease with interest rates. In addition, actual net investment income and/or cash flows from investments that carry prepayment risk may differ from those anticipated at the time of investment as a result of interest rate fluctuations.
 
We employ asset/liability management strategies to reduce the adverse effects of interest rate volatility and to increase the likelihood that cash flows are available to pay claims as they become due. Our asset/liability management strategies may fail to eliminate or reduce the adverse effects of interest rate volatility, and significant fluctuations in the level of interest rates may therefore have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
 
We are subject to credit risk in our investment portfolio, primarily from our investments in corporate bonds, preferred securities and municipal bonds. Defaults by third parties in the payment or performance of their obligations could reduce our investment income and realized investment gains or result in the recognition of investment losses. The fair value of our investments may be materially and adversely affected by increases in interest rates, downgrades in the corporate bonds included in the portfolio and by other factors that may result in the recognition of other-than-temporary impairments. Each of these events may cause us to reduce the fair value of our investment portfolio.
 
Further, the fair value of any particular fixed maturity security is subject to impairment based on the creditworthiness of a given issuer. Our fixed maturity portfolio may include below investment grade securities (rated "BB" or lower by nationally recognized securities rating organizations). These investments generally provide higher expected returns, but present greater risk and can be less liquid than investment grade securities. A significant increase in defaults and impairments on our fixed maturity investment portfolio could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Risks Related to Regulatory and Legal Matters
We are subject to extensive governmental laws and regulations, which increase our costs and could restrict the conduct of our business.
Our operations are subject to extensive regulation and supervision in the jurisdictions in which we do business. Such regulation or compliance could reduce our profitability or limit our growth by increasing the costs of compliance, limiting or restricting the products or services we sell, or the methods by which we sell our services and products, or subjecting our business to the possibility of regulatory actions or proceedings. In all jurisdictions, the applicable laws and regulations are subject to amendment or interpretation by regulatory authorities. Generally, such authorities have broad discretion to grant, renew or revoke licenses and approvals and to implement new regulations. We may be precluded or temporarily suspended from carrying on some or all of our activities or otherwise fined or penalized in any jurisdiction in which we operate. We can give no assurances that our business can continue to be conducted in each jurisdiction as we have in the past. Such regulation is generally designed to protect the interests of policyholders. To that end, the laws of the various states establish insurance departments and other regulatory agencies with broad powers with respect to matters, such as:
licensing and authorizing companies and agents to transact business;
regulating capital and surplus and dividend requirements;
regulating underwriting limitations;
regulating the ability of companies to enter and exit markets;
imposing statutory accounting requirements and annual statement disclosures;
approving changes in control of insurance companies;
regulating premium rates, including the ability to increase or maintain premium rates;
regulating trade billing and claims practices;
regulating certain transactions between affiliates;
regulating reinsurance arrangements, including the balance sheet credit that may be taken by the ceding or direct insurer;

42


mandating certain terms and conditions of coverage and benefits;
regulating the content of disclosures to consumers;
regulating the type, amounts and valuation of investments;
mandating assessments or other surcharges for guaranty funds and the ability to recover such assessments in the future through premium increases;
regulating market conduct and sales practices of insurers and agents, including compensation arrangements; and
regulating a variety of other financial and non-financial components of an insurer's business.

Our non-insurance products and certain aspects of our insurance products are subject to various other federal and state regulations, including state and federal consumer protection, privacy and other laws.

An insurer's ability to write new business is partly a function of its statutory surplus. Maintaining appropriate levels of surplus as measured by statutory accounting principles is considered important by insurance regulatory authorities and the private agencies that rate insurers' claims-paying abilities and financial strength. Failure to maintain certain levels of statutory surplus could result in increased regulatory scrutiny, a downgrade by rating agencies or enforcement action by regulatory authorities.
 
We may be unable to maintain all required licenses and approvals and, despite our best efforts, our business may not fully comply with the wide variety of applicable laws and regulations or the relevant regulators' interpretations of such laws and regulations. Also, some regulatory authorities have relatively broad discretion to grant, renew or revoke licenses and approvals or to limit or restrain operations in their jurisdiction. If we do not have the requisite licenses and approvals or do not comply with applicable regulatory requirements, the insurance regulatory authorities could preclude or temporarily suspend us from operating, limit some or all of our activities or financially penalize us. These types of actions could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
 
Failure to protect our clients' confidential information and privacy could result in the loss of our reputation and customers, reduction in our profitability and subject us to fines, penalties and litigation and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
We retain confidential information in our information systems, and we are subject to a variety of privacy regulations and confidentiality obligations. For example, some of our activities are subject to the privacy regulations of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. We also have contractual obligations to protect confidential information we obtain from our clients. These obligations generally require us, in accordance with applicable laws, to protect such information to the same extent that we protect our own confidential information. We have implemented physical, administrative and logical security systems with the intent of maintaining the physical security of our facilities and systems and protecting our clients' and their customers' confidential information and personally-identifiable information against unauthorized access through our information systems or by other electronic transmission or through misdirection, theft or loss of data. Despite such efforts, we may be subject to a breach of our security systems that results in unauthorized access to our facilities and/or the information we are trying to protect. Anyone who is able to circumvent our security measures and penetrate our information systems could access, view, misappropriate, alter or delete any information in the systems, including personally identifiable customer information and proprietary business information. In addition, most states require that customers be notified if a security breach results in the disclosure of personally-identifiable customer information. Any compromise of the security of our information systems that results in inappropriate disclosure of such information could result in, among other things, unfavorable publicity and damage to our reputation, governmental inquiry and oversight, difficulty in marketing our services, loss of clients, significant civil and criminal liability and the incurrence of significant technical, legal and other expenses, any of which may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
 
Changes in regulation may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition and limit our growth.
Legislation or other regulatory reform that increases the regulatory requirements imposed on us or that changes the way we are able to do business may significantly harm our business or results of operations in the future. If we were unable for any reason to comply with these requirements, our noncompliance could result in substantial costs to us and may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. Legislative or regulatory changes that could significantly harm us and our subsidiaries include, but are not limited to:
prohibiting our clients from providing debt cancellation policies or offering other ancillary products;
prohibiting insurers from fronting captive reinsurance arrangements;
placing or reducing interest rate caps on the consumer finance products our clients offer or including voluntary products in the annual percentage rate calculation;
limitations or imposed reductions on premium levels or the ability to raise premiums on existing policies;
increases in minimum capital, reserves and other financial viability requirements;
impositions of increased fines, taxes or other penalties for improper licensing, the failure to promptly pay claims, however defined, or other regulatory violations;
increased licensing requirements;
restrictions on the ability to offer certain types of products;
new or different disclosure requirements on certain types of products; and
imposition of new or different requirements for coverage determinations.

43



In recent years, the state insurance regulatory framework has come under increased federal scrutiny and some state legislatures have considered or enacted laws that may alter or increase state authority to regulate insurance companies and insurance holding companies. Further, the NAIC and state insurance regulators are re-examining existing laws and regulations, specifically focusing on modifications to holding company regulations, interpretations of existing laws and the development of new laws and regulations. Additionally, there have been attempts by the NAIC and several states to limit the use of discretionary clauses in policy forms. The elimination of discretionary clauses could increase our product costs. New interpretations of existing laws and the passage of new legislation may harm our ability to sell new services and products and increase our claims exposure on policies we issued previously. In addition, the NAIC's proposed expansion of the Market Conduct Annual Statement could increase the likelihood of examinations of insurance companies operating in niche markets. Court decisions that impact the insurance industry could result in the release of previously protected confidential and privileged information by departments of insurance, which could increase the risk of litigation.
 
Traditionally, the U.S. federal government has not directly regulated the business of insurance. However, federal legislation and administrative policies in several areas can significantly and adversely affect insurance companies. These areas include financial services regulation, securities regulation, privacy, tort reform legislation and taxation. For example, the Dodd-Frank Act provides for the enhanced federal supervision of financial institutions, including insurance companies in certain circumstances, and financial activities that represent a systemic risk to financial stability or the U.S. economy.
 
Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the Federal Insurance Office was established within the U.S. Treasury Department to monitor all aspects of the insurance industry and its authority would likely extend to all lines of insurance that our insurance company subsidiaries write. The director of the Federal Insurance Office serves in an advisory capacity to the Financial Stability Oversight Council and has the ability to recommend that an insurance company or an insurance holding company be subject to heightened prudential standards by the Federal Reserve, if it is determined that financial distress at the company could pose a threat to the financial stability of the U.S. economy. The Dodd-Frank Act also provides for the preemption of state laws when inconsistent with certain international agreements and would streamline the regulation of reinsurance and surplus lines insurance. At this time, we cannot assess whether any other proposed legislation or regulatory changes will be adopted, or what impact, if any, the Dodd-Frank Act or any other legislation or changes could have on our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

With regard to our payment protection products, there are federal and state laws and regulations that govern the disclosures related to lenders' sales of those products. Our ability to offer and administer those products on behalf of financial institutions is dependent upon their continued ability to sell those products. To the extent that federal or state laws or regulations change to restrict or prohibit the sale of these products, our revenues would be adversely affected. The Dodd-Frank Act created a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB") designed to add new regulatory oversight for the sales practices of these products. Recently, the CFPB's enforcement actions have resulted in large refunds and civil penalties against financial institutions in connection with their marketing of payment protection and other products. Due to such regulatory actions, some lenders may reduce their sales and marketing of payment protection and other ancillary products, which may adversely affect our revenues. The full impact of the CFPB's oversight is unpredictable and has not yet been realized fully.
 
Further, in a time of financial uncertainty or a prolonged economic downturn, regulators may choose to adopt more restrictive insurance laws and regulations. For example, insurance regulators may choose to restrict the ability of insurance company subsidiaries to make payments to their parent companies or reject rate increases due to the economic environment.
 
With respect to the property and casualty insurance policies we underwrite, federal legislative proposals regarding National Catastrophe Insurance, if adopted, could reduce the business need for some of the related products we provide. Additionally, as the U.S. Congress continues to respond to the recent housing foreclosure crisis, it could enact legislation placing additional barriers on creditor-placed insurance.
 
In recent years, several large organizations became subjects of intense public scrutiny due to high-profile data security breaches involving sensitive financial and health information. These events focused national attention on identity theft and the duty of organizations to notify impacted consumers in the event of a data security breach. Existing legislation in most states requires customer notification in the event of a data security breach. In addition, some states are adopting laws and regulations requiring minimum information security practices with respect to the collection and storage of personally-identifiable consumer data, and several bills before Congress contain provisions directed to national information security standards and breach notification requirements. Several significant legal, operational and reputational risks exist with regard to a data breach and customer notification. A breach of data security requiring public notification can result in regulatory fines, penalties or sanctions, civil lawsuits, loss of reputation, loss of clients and reduction of our profitability.
 
Our business is subject to risks related to litigation and regulatory actions.
We may be materially and adversely affected by judgments, settlements, unanticipated costs or other effects of legal and administrative proceedings now pending or that may be instituted in the future, or from investigations by regulatory bodies or administrative agencies. From time to time, we have had inquiries from regulatory bodies and administrative agencies relating to the operation of our business. Such inquiries may result in various audits, reviews and investigations. An adverse outcome of any investigation by, or other inquiries

44


from, such bodies or agencies could have a material adverse effect on us and result in the institution of administrative or civil proceedings, sanctions and the payment of fines and penalties, changes in personnel, and increased review and scrutiny of us by our clients, regulatory authorities, potential litigants, the media and others.
 
In particular, our insurance operations and certain of our membership and warranty operations are subject to comprehensive regulation and oversight by insurance departments in jurisdictions in which we do business. These insurance departments have broad administrative powers with respect to all aspects of the insurance business and, in particular, monitor the manner in which an insurance company offers, sells and administers its products. Therefore, we may from time to time be subject to a variety of legal and regulatory actions relating to our current and past business operations, including, but not limited to:
disputes over coverage or claims adjudication;
disputes over claim payment amounts and compliance with individual state regulatory requirements;
disputes regarding sales practices, disclosures, premium refunds, licensing, regulatory compliance, underwriting and compensation arrangements;
disputes with taxation and insurance authorities regarding our tax liabilities;
periodic examinations of compliance with applicable federal and state laws; and
industry-wide investigations regarding business practices including, but not limited to, the use of finite reinsurance and the marketing and refunding of insurance policies or certificates of insurance.

The prevalence and outcomes of any such actions cannot be predicted, and such actions or any litigation may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, if we were to experience difficulties with our relationship with a regulatory body in a given jurisdiction, it could have a material adverse effect on our ability to do business in that jurisdiction.

In addition, plaintiffs continue to bring new types of legal claims against insurance and related companies. Current and future court decisions and legislative activity may increase our exposure to these types of claims. Multi-party or class action claims may present additional exposure to substantial economic, non-economic and/or punitive damage awards. The success of even one of these claims, if it resulted in a significant damage award or a detrimental judicial ruling, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. This risk of potential liability may make reasonable settlements of claims more difficult to obtain. We cannot determine with any certainty what new theories of liability or recovery may evolve or what their impact may be on our business.
 
We cannot predict at this time the effect that current litigation, investigations and regulatory activity will have on the industries in which we operate or our business. In light of the regulatory and judicial environments in which we operate, we will likely become subject to further investigations and lawsuits from time to time in the future. Our involvement in any investigations and lawsuits would cause us to incur legal and other costs and, if we were found to have violated any laws, we could be required to pay fines and damages, perhaps in material amounts. In addition, we could be materially and adversely affected by the negative publicity for the insurance and other financial services industries related to any such proceedings and by any new industry-wide regulations or practices that may result from any such proceedings.
 
Our cash and cash equivalents could be adversely affected if the financial institutions with which our cash and cash equivalents are deposited fail.
We maintain cash and cash equivalents with major third party financial institutions, including interest-bearing money market accounts. In the United States, these accounts were fully insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") regardless of account balance through the Transaction Account Guarantee ("TAG") program created by Section 343 of the Dodd-Frank Act. The expiration of the TAG program on December 31, 2012, caused the FDIC's standard insurance limit of $250,000 per depositor per institution to be reimposed on January 1, 2013. Thus, our accounts containing cash and cash equivalents may exceed the FDIC's standard $250,000 insurance limit from time to time.

We may be subject to assertions that taxes must be collected based on sales and use of our services in various states, which could expose us to liability and cause material harm to our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Whether sales of our services are subject to state sales and use taxes is uncertain, due in part to the nature of our services and the relationships through which our services are offered, as well as changing state laws and interpretations of those laws. One or more states may seek to impose sales or use tax or other tax collection obligations on us, whether based on sales by us or our resellers or clients, including for past sales. A successful assertion that we should be collecting sales or other related taxes on our services could result in substantial tax liabilities for past sales, discourage customers from purchasing our services, discourage clients from offering or billing for our services, or otherwise cause material harm to our business, financial condition and results of operations.


45


Risks Related to Our Indebtedness
Our indebtedness may limit our financial and operating activities and may materially and adversely affect our ability to incur additional debt to fund future needs.
Our debt service obligations vary annually based on the amount of our indebtedness and the associated fixed and floating interest rates. See "MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Liquidity " in this Form 10-Q , regarding the amount of outstanding debt and our annual debt service. Although we believe that our current cash flows will be sufficient to cover our annual interest expense, any increase in our indebtedness or any decline in the amount of cash available to service our indebtedness increases the possibility that we could not pay, when due, the principal of, interest on or other amounts due with respect to our indebtedness. In addition, our indebtedness and any future indebtedness we may incur could:
make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our indebtedness, including financial and other restrictive covenants, which could result in an event of default under the agreements governing our indebtedness;
make us more vulnerable to adverse changes in general economic, industry and competitive conditions and adverse changes in government regulation;
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flows from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flows to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes;
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to competitors that have less debt; and
limit our ability to borrow additional amounts for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements, execution of our business strategy or other purposes.

Any of the above-listed factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Increases in interest rates could increase interest payable under our variable rate indebtedness.
We are subject to interest rate risk in connection with our variable rate indebtedness. See "QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK - Interest Rate Risk " in our 2013 Form 10-K, regarding our interest rate risk and "MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Liquidity " in this Report, regarding the amount of outstanding variable rate debt. Interest rate changes could increase the amount of our interest payments and thus negatively impact our future earnings and cash flows. If we do not have sufficient earnings, we may be required to refinance all or part of our existing debt, sell assets, borrow more money or sell more securities, none of which we can guarantee we will be able to do.

We may enter into hedging transactions that may become ineffective which adversely impact our financial condition.
Part of our interest rate risk strategy involves entering into hedging transactions to mitigate the risk of variable interest rate instruments by converting the variable interest rate to a fixed interest rate. Each hedging item must be regularly evaluated for hedge effectiveness. If it is determined that a hedging transaction is ineffective, we may be required to record losses reflected in our results of operations which could adversely impact our financial condition.

Despite our indebtedness levels, we and our subsidiaries may still be able to incur more indebtedness, which could further exacerbate the risks related to our indebtedness described above.
We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future subject to the limitations contained in the agreements governing our indebtedness. If we or our subsidiaries incur additional debt, the risks that we and they now face as a result of our indebtedness could intensify.
 
Restrictive covenants in the agreements governing our indebtedness may restrict our ability to pursue our business strategies.
The agreements governing our indebtedness contain a number of restrictive covenants that impose significant operating and financial restrictions on us and may limit our ability to pursue our business strategies or undertake actions that may be in our best interests. The agreements governing our indebtedness include covenants restricting, among other things, our ability to:
incur or guarantee additional debt;
incur liens;
complete mergers, consolidations and dissolutions;
sell certain of our assets that have been pledged as collateral; and
undergo a change in control.
 
Our assets have been pledged to secure some of our existing indebtedness.
Our credit facility, entered into in August 2012, with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. is secured by substantially all of our property and assets and property and assets owned by LOTS Intermediate Co. and certain of our subsidiaries that act as guarantors of our existing indebtedness. Such assets include the stock of LOTS Intermediate Co. and the right, title and interest of the borrowers and each guarantor in their respective material real estate property, fixtures, accounts, equipment, investment property, inventory, instruments, general

46


intangibles, intellectual property, money, cash or cash equivalents, software and other assets and, in each case, the proceeds thereof, subject to certain exceptions. In the event of a default under our indebtedness, the lender could foreclose against the assets securing such obligations. A foreclosure on these assets would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
 
Risks Related to Our Technology and Intellectual Property
Our information systems may fail or their security may be compromised, which could damage our business and materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Our business is highly dependent upon the effective operation of our information systems and our ability to store, retrieve, process and manage significant databases and expand and upgrade our information systems. We rely on these systems throughout our business for a variety of functions, including marketing and selling our products and services, performing our services, managing our operations, processing claims and applications, providing information to clients, performing actuarial analyses and maintaining financial records. The interruption or loss of our information processing capabilities through the loss of stored data, programming errors, the breakdown or malfunctioning of computer equipment or software systems, telecommunications failure or damage caused by weather or natural disasters or any other significant disruptions could harm our business, ability to generate revenues, client relationships, competitive position and reputation. Although we have additional data processing locations in Jacksonville, Florida and Atlanta, Georgia, disaster recovery procedures and insurance to protect against certain contingencies, such measures may not be effective or insurance may not continue to be available at reasonable prices, to cover all such losses or be sufficient to compensate us for the loss of business that may result from any failure of our information systems. In addition, our information systems may be vulnerable to physical or electronic intrusions, computer viruses or other attacks which could disable our information systems and our security measures may not prevent such attacks. The failure of our systems as a result of any security breaches, intrusions or attacks could cause significant interruptions to our operations, which could result in a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
The failure to effectively maintain and modernize our systems to keep up with technological advances could materially and adversely affect our business.
Our business is dependent upon our ability to ensure that our information systems keep up with technological advances. Our ability to keep our systems integrated with those of our clients is critical to the success of our business. If we do not effectively maintain our systems and update them to address technological advancements, our relationships and ability to do business with our clients may be materially and adversely affected. Our business depends significantly on effective information systems, and we have many different information systems utilized to conduct our business. We must commit significant resources to maintain and enhance existing information systems and develop new systems that allow us to keep pace with continuing changes in information processing technology, evolving industry, regulatory and legal standards and changing client preferences. A failure to maintain effective and efficient information systems, or a failure to efficiently and effectively consolidate our information systems and eliminate redundant or obsolete applications, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition or our ability to do business in particular jurisdictions. If we do not effectively maintain adequate systems, we could experience adverse consequences, including:
the inability to effectively market and price our services and products and make underwriting and reserving decisions;
the loss of existing clients;
difficulty attracting new clients;
regulatory problems, such as a failure to meet prompt payment obligations;
internal control problems;
exposure to litigation;
security breaches resulting in loss of data; and
increases in administrative expenses.

Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to protect our intellectual property rights and our ability not to infringe upon the intellectual property rights of third parties.
The success of our business will depend, in part, on preserving our trade secrets, maintaining the security of our know-how and data and operating without infringing upon patents and proprietary rights held by third parties. Failure to protect, monitor and control the use of our intellectual property rights could cause us to lose a competitive advantage and incur significant expenses. We rely on a combination of contractual provisions, confidentiality procedures and copyright, trademark, service mark and trade secret laws to protect the proprietary aspects of our brands, technology and data. These legal measures afford only limited protection, and competitors or others may gain access to our intellectual property and proprietary information.
 
Our trade secrets, data and know-how could be subject to unauthorized use, misappropriation, or disclosure. Our trademarks could be challenged, forcing us to re-brand our services or products, resulting in loss of brand recognition and requiring us to devote resources to advertising and marketing new brands or licensing. If we are found to have infringed upon the intellectual property rights of third parties, we may be subject to injunctive relief restricting our use of affected elements of intellectual property used in the business, or we may be required to, among other things, pay royalties or enter into licensing agreements in order to obtain the rights to use necessary technologies, which may not be possible on commercially reasonable terms, or we may be required to redesign our systems, which may not be feasible.
 

47


Furthermore, litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights to protect our trade secrets and to determine the validity and scope of our proprietary rights. The intellectual property laws and other statutory and contractual arrangements we currently depend upon may not provide sufficient protection in the future to prevent the infringement, use or misappropriation of our trademarks, data, technology and other services and products. Policing unauthorized use of intellectual property rights can be difficult and expensive, and adequate remedies may not be available. Any future litigation, regardless of outcome, could result in substantial expense and diversion of resources with no assurance of success and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock
There may not be an active, liquid trading market for our common stock .
Prior to our Initial Public Offering, there had been no public market for shares of our common stock. The trading activity in our securities is relatively low and our company has a relatively small public float.  We cannot predict the extent to which investor interest in our Company will continue to maintain an active and liquid trading market. If an active trading market in our common stock does not continue, you may have difficulty selling shares of our common stock that you own or purchase.

As a public company, we are subject to additional financial and other reporting and corporate governance requirements that may be difficult for us to satisfy.
We are required to file with the SEC, annual and quarterly information and other reports that are specified in the Exchange Act. We are required to ensure that we have the ability to prepare financial statements that are fully compliant with all SEC reporting requirements on a timely basis. We are subject to other reporting and corporate governance requirements, including the requirements of the NYSE and certain provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("SOX") and the regulations promulgated thereunder, which impose significant compliance obligations upon us. Should we fail to comply with these rules and regulations we may face de-listing from the NYSE and face disciplinary actions from the SEC, which may adversely affect our stock price.

If our internal controls are found to be ineffective, our financial results or our stock price may be adversely affected.
Our most recent evaluation resulted in our conclusion that as of March 31, 2014 , we were in compliance with Section 404 of SOX and our internal control over financial reporting was effective. We believe that we currently have adequate internal control procedures in place for future periods; however, if our internal control over financial reporting is found to be ineffective or if we identify a material weakness in our financial reporting, investors may lose confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which may adversely affect our financial results or our stock price.

Our principal stockholder has substantial control over us.
Affiliates of Summit Partners collectively and beneficially own approximately 62.1% of our outstanding common stock at March 31, 2014 . As a consequence, Summit Partners or its affiliates continue to be able to exert a significant degree of influence or actual control over our management and affairs and matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors, a merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets, and any other significant transaction. The interests of this stockholder may not always coincide with our interests or the interests of our other stockholders. For instance, this concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of us otherwise favored by our other stockholders and could depress our stock price.
 
We expect that our stock price will fluctuate significantly, which could cause a decline in the stock price, and holders of our common stock may not be able to resell shares at or above the cost of such shares.
Securities markets worldwide have experienced, and are likely to continue to experience, significant price and volume fluctuations. This market volatility, as well as general economic, market or political conditions, could reduce the market price of our common stock regardless of our operating performance. The trading price of our common stock may be volatile and subject to wide price fluctuations in response to various factors, including:
market conditions in the broader stock market;
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly financial and operating results;
introduction of new products or services by us or our competitors;
issuance of new or changed securities analysts' reports or recommendations;
investor perceptions of us and the industries in which we operate;
sales, or anticipated sales, of large blocks of our stock;
additions or departures of key personnel;
regulatory or political developments;
litigation and governmental investigations; and
changing economic conditions.
These and other factors may cause the market price and demand for our common stock to fluctuate substantially, which may limit or prevent investors from readily selling their shares of common stock and may otherwise negatively affect the liquidity of our common stock. In addition, in the past, when the market price of a stock has been volatile, holders of that stock have sometimes instituted securities class action litigation against the company that issued the stock. If any of our stockholders brought a lawsuit against us, we

48


could incur substantial costs defending the lawsuit. Such a lawsuit could also divert the time and attention of our management from our business, which could significantly harm our results of operations and reputation.
 
If a substantial number of shares become available for sale and are sold in a short period of time, the market price of our common stock could decline.
At March 31, 2014 , we had 21,258,799 shares of common stock issued, including shares held in treasury, with our directors, executive officers and affiliates holding a significant majority of these shares. If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, the market price of our common stock could decrease significantly. The perception in the public market that our existing stockholders might sell shares of common stock could also depress the market price of our common stock. A decline in the market price of our common stock might impede our ability to raise capital through the issuance of additional shares of our common stock or other equity securities.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, publish research or reports containing negative information about our business, adversely change their recommendations regarding our stock or if our results of operations do not meet their expectations, our stock price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock is influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our business. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our Company or fail to publish reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline. Moreover, if one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our stock, or if our results of operations do not meet their expectations, our stock price could decline.
 
Some provisions of Delaware law and our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws may deter third parties from acquiring us and diminish the value of our common stock.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide for, among other things:
restrictions on the ability of our stockholders to call a special meeting and the business that can be conducted at such meeting;
restrictions on the ability of our stockholders to remove a director or fill a vacancy on the Board of Directors;
our ability to issue preferred stock with terms that the Board of Directors may determine, without stockholder approval;
the absence of cumulative voting in the election of directors;
a prohibition of action by written consent of stockholders unless such action is recommended by all directors then in office; and
advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and nominations.
These provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of the Company that is in the best interest of our non-controlling stockholders. Even in the absence of a takeover attempt, the existence of these provisions may adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock if they are viewed as discouraging future takeover attempts.
 
Applicable insurance laws may make it difficult to effect a change in control of us.
State insurance regulatory laws contain provisions that require advance approval, by the state insurance commissioner, of any change in control of an insurance company that is domiciled, or, in some cases, having such substantial business that it is deemed to be commercially domiciled, in that state. We own, directly or indirectly, all of the shares of stock of insurance companies domiciled in California, Delaware, Georgia and Louisiana, and 85% of the shares of stock of an insurance company domiciled in Kentucky. Because any purchaser of shares of our common stock representing 10% or more of the voting power of the capital stock of Fortegra generally will be presumed to have acquired control of these insurance company subsidiaries, the insurance change in control laws of California, Delaware, Georgia, Louisiana and Kentucky would apply to such a transaction.
 
In addition, the laws of many states contain provisions requiring pre-notification to state agencies prior to any change in control of a non-domestic insurance company subsidiary that transacts business in that state. While these pre-notification statutes do not authorize the state agency to disapprove the change in control, they do authorize issuance of cease and desist orders with respect to the non-domestic insurer if it is determined that conditions, such as undue market concentration, would result from the change in control.
 
These laws may discourage potential acquisition proposals and may delay, deter or prevent a change of control of the Company, including through transactions, and in particular unsolicited transactions, that some or all of our stockholders might consider to be desirable.
 
We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends for the foreseeable future.
We currently intend to retain our future earnings, if any, for the foreseeable future, to repay indebtedness and for general corporate purposes. We do not intend to pay any dividends for the foreseeable future to holders of our common stock. As a result, capital appreciation in the price of our common stock, if any, will be your only source of gain on an investment in our common stock.


49



ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

(a) Not Applicable.

(b) Not Applicable.

(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

As of March 31, 2014 , Fortegra had a share repurchase plan, which allows the Company to purchase up to $15.0 million of the Company's common stock from time to time through open market or private transactions. The Board of Directors approved a $10.0 million share repurchase plan in November 2011 and increased the size of the plan by $5.0 million in August 2013. The share repurchase plan has no expiration date and provides for shares to be repurchased for general corporate purposes, which may include serving as a resource for funding potential acquisitions and employee benefit plans. The timing, price and quantity of purchases are at our discretion, and the plan may be discontinued or suspended at any time. There were no repurchases during the first quarter of 2014.

The following table shows Fortegra's share repurchase plan activity for the three months ended March 31, 2014 :
Period
 
 
 
Total Number of Shares Purchased
 
Average Price Paid Per Share
 
Total Number of Shares  Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan
 
Maximum  Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plan
Balance at December 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
1,179,634

 
$
7,167,376

January 1, 2014
to
January 31, 2014
 

 
$

 

 
7,167,376

February 1, 2014
to
February 28, 2014
 

 

 

 
7,167,376

March 1, 2014
to
March 31, 2014
 

 

 

 
7,167,376

Total
 
 
 

 
$

 
1,179,634

 
 

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

See the Exhibit Index following the signature page of this Form 10-Q for a list of exhibits filed with, furnished with or incorporated
by reference into this Form 10-Q .


50


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
 
Fortegra Financial Corporation
Date:
May 14, 2014
 
By:
/s/ Richard S. Kahlbaugh
 
 
 
 
Richard S. Kahlbaugh
 
 
 
 
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
 
(Duly authorized officer)
 
 
 
 
 
Date:
May 14, 2014
 
By:
/s/ Walter P. Mascherin
 
 
 
 
Walter P. Mascherin
 
 
 
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 
 
(Duly authorized officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)




51


EXHIBIT INDEX
 
 
Incorporated by Reference
 
 
 
Exhibit Number
Description of Exhibits
Form
File Number
Date Filed
Original Exhibit Number
Filed Herewith
Furnished Herewith
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2.1
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of March 7, 2007, by and among Summit Partners Private Equity Fund VII-A, L.P., Summit Partners Private Equity Fund VII-B, L.P., Summit Subordinated Debt Fund III-A, L.P., Summit Subordinated Debt Fund III-B, L.P., Summit Investors VI, L.P., LOS Acquisition Co., the Signing Stockholders and Life of the South Corporation and N.G. Houston III, as Stockholder Representative.
S-1
333-169550
9/23/2010
2.1
 
 
2.2
First Amendment to Merger Agreement, dated as of June 20, 2007 by and among Summit Partners Private Equity Fund VII-A, L.P., Summit Partners Private Equity Fund VII-B, L.P., Summit Subordinated Debt Fund III-A, L.P., Summit Subordinated Debt Fund III-B, L.P., Summit Investors VI, L.P., LOS Acquisition Co., the Signing Stockholders, and Life of the South Corporation and N.G. Houston, III, as Stockholder Representative.
S-1
333-169550
9/23/2010
2.2
 
 
2.3
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2009, by and among Willis HRH, Inc., Bliss and Glennon, Inc., LOTS Intermediate Co., Willis North America Inc. and Fortegra Financial Corporation.
S-1
333-169550
9/23/2010
2.3
 
 
2.4
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated March 3, 2011 by and among eReinsure.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Alpine Acquisition Sub., Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Century Capital Partners III, L.P., as Agent solely for the purposes of Section 10.02, and LOTS Intermediate Co., a Delaware corporation.
8-K
001-35009
3/7/2011
2.1
 
 
2.5
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated December 2, 2013, by and among Fortegra Financial Corporation, a Delaware corporation, LOTS Intermediate Co., a Delaware corporation, Bliss and Glennon, Inc., a California corporation, eReinsure.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and AmWINS Holdings, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company.
8-K
001-35009
1/7/2014
2.1
 
 
3.1
Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Fortegra Financial Corporation.
S-1/A
333-169550
12/13/2010
3.3
 
 
3.2
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Fortegra Financial Corporation.
S-1/A
333-169550
11/29/2010
3.4
 
 
4.1
Form of Common Stock Certificate.
S-1/A
333-169550
12/13/2010
4.1
 
 
4.2
Stockholders Agreement, dated as of March 7, 2007, among Life of the South Corporation (together with its successors), the Rollover Stockholders (as defined therein), Employee Stockholders (as defined therein) and Investors (as defined therein).
S-1/A
333-169550
10/29/2010
4.2
 
 
10.1
Indenture, dated as of June 20, 2007, between LOTS Intermediate Co. and Wilmington Trust Company.
S-1
333-169550
9/23/2010
10.1
 
 
10.2
Form of Fixed/Floating Rate Senior Debenture (included in Exhibit 10.1).
S-1
333-169550
9/23/2010
10.2
 
 
10.3
Form of Fortegra Financial Corporation Director Indemnification Agreement for John R. Carroll and J.J. Kardwell.
S-1/A
333-169550
11/29/2010
10.18
 
 
10.4
Form of Fortegra Financial Corporation Director Indemnification Agreement for Francis M. Colalucci, Frank P. Filipps, Arun Maheshwari, Ted W. Rollins and Sean S. Sweeney.
S-1/A
333-169550
11/29/2010
10.19
 
 
10.5
Form of Fortegra Financial Corporation Officer Indemnification Agreement.
S-1/A
333-169550
12/3/2010
10.20
 
 
10.6
Form of Indemnity Agreement between Fortegra Financial Corporation, as Indemnitor, and the executive officers serving as plan committee members for the Fortegra Financial Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan, as Indemnitees.
S-1/A
333-169550
10/29/2010
10.21
 
 
10.7*
Executive Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of March 7, 2007, by and between Life of the South Corporation and Richard S. Kahlbaugh.
S-1/A
333-169550
12/3/2010
10.22
 
 
10.7.1*
Amendment No. 1 to Executive Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2010, by and between Fortegra Financial Corporation and Richard S. Kahlbaugh.
S-1/A
333-169550
12/3/2010
10.22.1
 
 
10.8*
Executive Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2010, by and between Fortegra Financial Corporation and Walter P. Mascherin.
S-1/A
333-169550
12/3/2010
10.27
 
 
10.9*
Life of the South Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan.
S-1/A
333-169550
10/29/2010
10.28
 
 

52


EXHIBIT INDEX
 
 
Incorporated by Reference
 
 
 
Exhibit Number
Description of Exhibits
Form
File Number
Date Filed
Original Exhibit Number
Filed Herewith
Furnished Herewith
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.10*
1995 Key Employee Stock Option Plan.
S-1/A
333-169550
10/29/2010
10.29
 
 
10.11*
Stock Option Agreement by and between Life of the South Corporation and Richard S. Kahlbaugh, dated as of November 18, 2005, as amended on March 7, 2007 and June 20, 2007.
S-1/A
333-169550
11/16/2010
10.30
 
 
10.12*
Stock Option Agreement by and between Life of the South Corporation and Richard Kahlbaugh, dated as of October 25, 2007.
S-1/A
333-169550
11/16/2010
10.31
 
 
10.13*
2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
S-1/A
333-169550
12/3/2010
10.32
 
 
10.14*
Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
S-1/A
333-169550
12/3/2010
10.33
 
 
10.15*
Deferred Compensation Agreement, dated January 1, 2006, between Life of the South Corporation and Richard S. Kahlbaugh.
S-1/A
333-169550
10/29/2010
10.35
 
 
10.16*
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Directors.
S-1/A
333-169550
12/3/2010
10.47
 
 
10.16.1*
Amended - Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Directors, effective February 2013.
10-K
001-35009
4/1/2013
10.26.1
 
 
10.17*
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Employees.
S-1/A
333-169550
12/3/2010
10.48
 
 
10.17.1*
Amended - Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Employees, effective February 18, 2013.
10-Q
001-35009
5/15/2013
10.27.1
 
 
10.18*
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Bonus Pool).
S-1/A
333-169550
12/3/2010
10.49
 
 
10.19*
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement.
S-1/A
333-169550
12/3/2010
10.50
 
 
10.19.1*
Amended - Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement, effective February 18, 2013.
10-Q
001-35009
5/15/2013
10.29.1
 
 
10.20*
Executive Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2009, by and between Fortegra Financial Corporation and Joseph McCaw.
10-Q
001-35009
5/15/2012
10.39
 
 
10.21
Credit Agreement, dated August 2, 2012, as amended by amendment to Credit Agreement, dated October 4, 2013, among Fortegra Financial Corporation and LOTS Intermediate Co., as Borrowers; the initial Lenders named therein; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swingline Lender, and Issuing Lender; Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as Bookrunner and Joint Lead Arranger; and Synovus Bank as Joint Lead Arranger and Syndication Agent. (Conformed Copy).
10-Q
001-35009
11/14/2013
10.34
 
 
10.21.1
Second Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated April 11, 2014, by and among Fortegra Financial Corporation and LOTS Intermediate Co., as Borrowers; the Subsidiaries (as defined in the Credit Agreement) party thereto, each of the Lenders (as defined in the Credit Agreement) and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent.
8-K
001-35009
4/16/2014
10.1
 
 
10.22
Subsidiary Guaranty Agreement, dated August 2, 2012, among certain subsidiaries, as Guarantors, of Fortegra Financial Corporation and LOTS Intermediate Co., as Borrowers, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and each of the Guaranteed Parties.
8-K
001-35009
8/7/2012
10.2
 
 
10.23
Pledge Agreement, dated August 2, 2012, by Fortegra Financial Corporation and LOTSoluntions, Inc., as Pledgors, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent for its benefit and the benefit of other Lenders.
8-K
001-35009
8/7/2012
10.3
 
 
10.24
Security Agreement, dated August 2, 2012, among Fortegra Financial Corporation, LOTS Intermediate Co. and certain of its subsidiaries, as Grantors, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent for its benefit and the benefit of the Secured Creditors.
8-K
001-35009
8/7/2012
10.4
 
 
10.24.1
Security Agreement Joinder, dated April 11, 2014, to the Security Agreement dated as of August 2, 2012, by and among Fortegra Financial Corporation and LOTS Intermediate Co., as Borrowers, certain subsidiaries of the Borrowers, as Grantors, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent for its benefit and the benefit of the Secured Creditors.
 
 
 
 
X
 
10.25
Trademark Security Agreement, dated August 2, 2012, among the Fortegra Financial Corporation, LOTSolutions, Inc., Pacific Benefits Group Northwest, L.L.C., eReinsure.com, Inc., as Grantors, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and Grantee, for the benefit of the Secured Creditors.
8-K
001-35009
8/7/2012
10.5
 
 
10.26*
2013 Executive Annual Incentive Plan.
10-Q
001-35009
8/14/2013
10.41
 
 
10.27*
Quarterly Incentive Plan.
10-Q
001-35009
8/14/2013
10.42
 
 

53


EXHIBIT INDEX
 
 
Incorporated by Reference
 
 
 
Exhibit Number
Description of Exhibits
Form
File Number
Date Filed
Original Exhibit Number
Filed Herewith
Furnished Herewith
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.28*
Executive Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of March 6, 2007, by and between Life of the South Corporation and W. Dale Bullard.
S-1/A
333-169550
11/29/2010
10.25
 
 
10.29*
Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Agreement, dated May 1, 2005, by and between Life of the South Corporation and W. Dale Bullard.
S-1/A
333-169550
10/29/2010
10.34
 
 
10.30*
Long Term Incentive Plan.
 
 
 
 
X
 
10.31*
2014 Executive Annual Incentive Plan.
 
 
 
 
X
 
11.1
Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings (incorporated by reference to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in PART I, ITEM 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q).
 
 
 
 
X
 
31.1
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
 
 
 
 
X
 
31.2
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
 
 
 
 
X
 
32
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
 
 
X
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document.
 
 
 
 
X
 
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
 
 
 
 
X
 
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
 
 
 
 
X
 
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
 
 
 
 
X
 
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
 
 
 
 
X
 
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
 
 
 
 
X
 
*
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.





54
The Fortegra (NYSE:FRF)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Jun 2024 bis Jul 2024 Click Here for more The Fortegra Charts.
The Fortegra (NYSE:FRF)
Historical Stock Chart
Von Jul 2023 bis Jul 2024 Click Here for more The Fortegra Charts.