WESBANCO, INC. FQ3 2024 EARNINGS CALL OCT 24, 2024
Yes. I would tell you that, well, first, were always reinvesting, right? So but generally
speaking, I would tell you that that $4 million, which is about $1 million a quarter, call it, should be more or less drop into the bottom line. If we think about expense run rate kind of forward, I would tell you, and I said in my
prepared remarks that were not anticipating much difference from what we reported here in the third quarter.
The one thing or a couple of things I
would tell you, though, that would be different from third quarter versus fourth quarter on expense run rate is for our sellers and wages, our hourly employees, their merit increases occur in August, and so well have a full quarters
worth of merit increases in the fourth quarter versus kind of having 2/3 of that merit increase in the third quarter.
Also, health care can be very
difficult to predict. But I would say, typically in that fourth quarter, health care expenses are a bit higher just because employees have kind of burned through their deductibles. And at that point, the cost for any additional medical procedures is
on the company. And then I would just tell you its kind of some offsetting things, that we had a pretty big marketing campaign, as we talked about on our prepared commentary. I wouldnt expect marketing expense to be quite as high as what
we experienced in the third quarter. So some puts and takes, but I think overall pretty close to third quarter, maybe a little bit heavier.
Operator
The next question comes from Catherine Mealor with KBW.
Catherine Fitzhugh Summerson Mealor
Keefe, Bruyette, &
Woods, Inc., Research Division
Just a small question. But on fees, I noticed that other income was down a little bit. What was the driver there? And
should we expect that to bounce back to that kind of $5 million level weve seen in the past few quarters?
Daniel K. Weiss
Senior Executive VP & CFO
Yes. On noninterest income,
the driver really was in swap fees. The valuation adjustment this quarter was a negative $1.7 million compared to a positive $1.4 million in the third quarter of 23. So that swing is really whats causing probably, if
youre looking kind of year-over-year or even quarter-over linked quarter, for that matter, thats whats driving it.
We dont
expect that to occur here again in the fourth quarter. But again, that is thats pure valuation. Thats not necessarily an indication of anything other than just movement in interest rates relative to where those back-to-back swaps were booked.
Catherine Fitzhugh Summerson Mealor
Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., Research Division
You had
that lumped together in others. So that makes sense. And then back to the margin, the 3.70% to 3.80% NIM that you mentioned, just wanted to confirm that that is where you were thinking that the pro forma margin goes kind of at close with Premier,
including accretable yield? To kind of a second go ahead.
Daniel K. Weiss
Senior Executive VP & CFO
No, Im not I
dont believe I quoted 3.70% to 3.80%.
Catherine Fitzhugh Summerson Mealor
Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., Research Division
Im
sorry Im sorry, 3.45% to 3.50%, I misspoke.
Daniel K. Weiss
Senior Executive VP & CFO
Yes. Yes. Yes. correct.
Im sorry, what was the question?
Catherine Fitzhugh Summerson Mealor
Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., Research Division
The 3.45%
to 3.50% pro forma margin that you mentioned. That was can you what exactly are you pointing to with that 3.45%, 3.50% comment?
6