OLP One Liberty Properties Inc

Table of Contents

​

​

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

​

Commission File Number 001-09279

ONE LIBERTY PROPERTIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

​

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (516) 466-3100

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ◻ No ⌧

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ◻ No ⌧

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ⌧ No ◻

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ⌧ No ◻

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a small reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “small reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

​

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ◻

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a shell company (defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of June 30, 2021 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter), the aggregate market value of all common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the price at which common equity was last sold on said date, was approximately $458 million.

As of March 1, 2022, the registrant had 21,120,936 shares of common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the proxy statement for the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders of One Liberty Properties, Inc., to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than May 2, 2022, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

​

​

​

​

​

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Form 10-K

​

​

​

​

​

Table of Contents

Explanatory Note

In the narrative portion of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, except as otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires:

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K, together with other statements and information publicly disseminated by us, contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provision for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and include this statement for purposes of complying with these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “may,” “will,” “could,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” or similar expressions or variations thereof and include, without limitation, statements regarding our future estimated contractual rental income, funds from operations, adjusted funds from operations and our dividend. Among other things, forward looking statements with respect to (i) estimates of rental income for 2022  may exclude variable rent, (ii) anticipated property sales may not be completed during the period indicated or at all, and (iii) estimates of gains from property sales are subject to adjustment, among other things, because actual closing costs may

Table of Contents

differ from the estimated costs. You should not rely on forward-looking statements since they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which are, in some cases, beyond our control and which could materially affect actual results, performance or achievements.

Currently, a significant risk and uncertainty we face is the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the various governmental and non-governmental responses thereto, and the related economic consequences of the foregoing on (i) our and our tenants’ financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and performance, and (ii) the real estate market, global economy and financial markets.  The extent to which COVID-19 impacts us, our tenants and the economy generally will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence.  Additional uncertainties, risks and factors which may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations include, but are not limited to:

In light of the factors referred to above, the future events discussed or incorporated by reference in this report and other documents we file with the SEC may not occur, and actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements.  Given these uncertainties, you should not rely on any forward-looking statements.

Except as may be required under the United States federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update our forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or

Table of Contents

otherwise. You are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures we make in our reports that are filed with or furnished to the SEC.

​

Table of Contents

Subsequent to December 31, 2021, we:

​

Our Business Objective

Our business objective is to increase stockholder value by:

Table of Contents

Acquisition Strategies

We seek to acquire properties throughout the United States that have locations, demographics and other investment attributes that we believe to be attractive. We believe that long-term leases provide a predictable income stream over the term of the lease, making fluctuations in market rental rates and in real estate values less significant to achieving our overall investment objectives. Our primary objective is to acquire single-tenant properties that are subject to long-term net leases that include periodic contractual rental increases or rent increases based on increases in the consumer price index. Periodic contractual rental increases provide reliable increases in future rent payments and rent increases based on the consumer price index provide protection against inflation. Historically, long-term leases have made it easier for us to obtain longer-term, fixed-rate mortgage financing with principal amortization, thereby moderating the interest rate risk associated with financing or refinancing our property portfolio and reducing the outstanding principal balance over time. We have, however, acquired properties, and may continue to acquire properties, that are subject to short-term leases when we believe that such properties represent a favorable opportunity for generating additional income from its re-lease or has significant residual value. Although the acquisition of single-tenant properties subject to net leases is the focus of our investment strategy, we also consider investments in, among other things, (i) properties that can be re-positioned or re-developed, (ii) community shopping centers anchored by national or regional tenants and (iii) properties ground leased to operators of multi-family properties.

Generally, we hold the properties we acquire for an extended period of time. Our investment criteria are intended to identify properties from which increased asset value and overall return can be realized from an extended period of ownership. Although our investment criteria favor an extended period of ownership, we will dispose of a property if we regard the disposition of the property as an opportunity to realize the overall value of the property sooner or to avoid future risks by achieving a determinable return from the property.

Historically, a significant portion of our portfolio generated rental income from retail properties. We are sensitive to the risks facing the retail industry and over the past several years have been addressing our exposure thereto by focusing on acquiring industrial properties and properties that, among other things, capitalize on e-commerce activities – since September 2016, we have not acquired any retail properties, and have sold 16 retail properties. As a result of the focus on industrial properties and the sale of retail properties, retail properties generated 30.2%, 32.9%, 35.2%, 41.9% and 43.7%, of rental income, net, in 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and industrial properties generated 57.0%, 55.4%, 48.7%, 40.1% and 35.1%, of rental income, net, in 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

We identify properties through the network of contacts of our senior management and our affiliates, which contacts include real estate brokers, private equity firms, banks and law firms. In addition, we attend industry conferences and engage in direct solicitations.

Our charter documents do not limit the number of properties in which we may invest, the amount or percentage of our assets that may be invested in any specific property or property type, or the concentration of investments in any region in the United States. We do not intend to acquire properties located outside of the United States. We will continue to form entities to acquire interests in real properties, either alone or with other investors, and we may acquire interests in joint ventures or other entities that own real property.

It is our policy, and the policy of our affiliated entities (as described below), that any investment opportunity presented to us or to any of our affiliated entities that involves the acquisition of a net leased property, a ground lease (other than a ground lease of a multi-family property) or a community shopping center, will first be offered to us and may not be pursued by any of our affiliated entities unless we decline the opportunity. Further, to the extent our affiliates are unable or unwilling to pursue an acquisition of a multi-family property (including a ground lease of a multi-family property), we may pursue such transaction if it meets our investment objectives. Our affiliated entities include Gould Investors L.P., a master limited partnership involved primarily in the ownership and operation of a diversified portfolio of real estate assets, BRT Apartments Corp., a NYSE listed multi-family REIT and Majestic Property Management Corp., a property management company, which is wholly-owned by Fredric H. Gould, our vice chairman.

Investment Evaluation

In evaluating potential investments, we consider, among other criteria, the following:

Table of Contents

Typical Property Attributes

As of December 31, 2021, the properties in our portfolio have the following attributes:

Table of Contents

Many of our tenants (including franchisees of national chains) operate on a national basis including, among others, Advanced Auto, Applebees, Burlington Coat Factory, CVS, Famous Footwear, FedEx, Ferguson Enterprises, LA Fitness, Marshalls, NARDA Holdings, Inc., Northern Tool, Office Depot, PetSmart, Regal Cinemas, Ross Stores, Shutterfly, TGI Friday’s, The Toro Company, and Walgreens, and some of our tenants operate on a regional basis, including Havertys Furniture and Giant Food Stores.

Our Leases

Most of our leases are net leases under which the tenant, in addition to its rental obligation, typically is responsible, directly or indirectly for expenses attributable to the operation of the property, such as real estate taxes and assessments, insurance and ordinary maintenance and repairs. The tenant is also generally responsible for maintaining the property and for restoration following a casualty or partial condemnation. The tenant is typically obligated to indemnify us for claims arising from the property and is responsible for maintaining insurance coverage for the property it leases and naming us an additional insured. Under some net leases, we are responsible for structural repairs, including foundation and slab, roof repair or replacement and restoration following a casualty event, and at several properties we are responsible for certain expenses related to the operation and maintenance of the property.

Many of our leases provide for contractual rent increases periodically throughout the term of the lease or for rent increases pursuant to a formula based on the consumer price index. Some leases provide for minimum rents supplemented by additional payments based on sales derived from the property subject to the lease (i.e., percentage rent). Percentage rent contributed $70,000, $45,000 and $43,000 of rental income in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Generally, our strategy is to acquire properties that are subject to existing long-term leases or to enter into long-term leases with our tenants. Our leases generally provide the tenant with one or more renewal options.

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth scheduled expirations of leases at our properties as of December 31, 2021:

​

Financing, Re-Renting and Disposition of Our Properties

Our credit facility provides us with a source of funds that may be used to acquire properties, payoff existing mortgages, and to a more limited extent, invest in joint ventures, improve properties and for working capital purposes. Net proceeds received from the sale, financing or refinancing of properties are required to be used to repay amounts outstanding under our facility. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Credit Facility”.

We mortgage specific properties on a non-recourse basis, subject to standard carve-outs to enhance the return on our investment in a specific property. The proceeds of mortgage loans are first applied to reduce indebtedness on our credit facility and the balance may be used for other general purposes, including property acquisitions, investments in joint ventures or other entities that own real property, and working capital.

With respect to properties we acquire on a free and clear basis, we usually seek to obtain long-term fixed-rate mortgage financing, when available at acceptable terms, shortly after the acquisition of such property to avoid the risk of movement of interest rates and fluctuating supply and demand in the mortgage markets. We also will acquire a property that is subject to (and will assume) a fixed-rate mortgage. Substantially all of our mortgages provide for amortization of part of the principal balance during the term, thereby reducing the refinancing risk at maturity. Some of our properties may be financed on a cross-defaulted or cross-collateralized basis, and we may collateralize a single financing with more than one property.

After termination or expiration of any lease relating to any of our properties, we will seek to re-rent or sell such property in a manner that will maximize the return to us, considering, among other factors, the income potential and market value of such property. We acquire properties for long-term investment for income purposes and do not typically engage in the turnover of investments. We will consider the sale of a property if a sale appears advantageous in view of our investment objectives. If there is a substantial tax gain, we may seek to enter into a tax deferred transaction and reinvest the proceeds in another property. Cash realized from the sale of properties, net of required payoffs of the related mortgage debt, if any, required paydowns of our credit facility, and distributions to stockholders, is available for general working capital purposes and the acquisition of additional properties.

Table of Contents

Our Joint Ventures

As of December 31, 2021, we own a 50% equity interest in three joint ventures that own properties with approximately 365,000 square feet of space. At December 31, 2021, our investment in these joint ventures was approximately $10.2 million and the occupancy rate at these properties, based on square footage, was 59.1%. See “Item 2. Properties-Properties Owned by Joint Ventures” for information about, among other things, the occupancy rate at our joint venture properties.

Based on the leases in effect at December 31, 2021, we anticipate that our share of the base rent payable in 2022 to our joint ventures is approximately $1.6 million (excluding our $121,000 share of the COVID-19 rent deferral payments payable by Regal Cinemas, at our multi-tenant community shopping center in Manahawkin, New Jersey). Our property in Manahawkin, New Jersey, which we refer to as the “Manahawkin Property”, is expected to contribute 85.3% of the aggregate base rent payable by all of our joint ventures in 2022. Base rent for leases accounting for 2.5%, 43.5% and 54.0% of the aggregate base rent payable to all of our joint ventures in 2022, is payable pursuant to leases expiring from 2022 to 2023, from 2024 to 2025, and thereafter, respectively. See “Item 1A, Risk Factors” and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for information regarding our Manahawkin, New Jersey joint venture.

Competition

The U.S. commercial real estate investment market is highly competitive. We compete with many entities engaged in the acquisition, development and operation of commercial properties. As such, we compete with other investors for a limited supply of properties and financing for these properties. Competitors include traded and non-traded public REITs, private equity firms, institutional investment funds, insurance companies and private individuals, many of which have greater financial and other resources than we have and the ability or willingness to accept more risk than we believe appropriate. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully with such entities in our acquisition, development and leasing activities in the future.

Regulation

Environmental

Investments in real property create the potential for environmental liability on the part of the owner or operator of such real property. If hazardous substances are discovered on or emanating from a property, the owner or operator of the property may be held strictly liable for all costs and liabilities relating to such hazardous substances. We have obtained a Phase I environmental study (which involves inspection without soil sampling or ground water analysis) conducted by independent environmental consultants on each of our properties and, in certain instances, have conducted additional investigations.

We do not believe that there are hazardous substances existing on our properties that would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations. We do not carry insurance coverage for the types of environmental risks described above.

We believe that we are in compliance, in all material respects, with all federal, state and local ordinances and regulations regarding hazardous or toxic substances. Furthermore, we have not been notified by any governmental authority of any noncompliance, liability or other claim in connection with any of our properties, that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations.

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990

Our properties are required to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and similar state and local laws and regulations (collectively, the “ADA”). The primary responsibility for complying with the ADA, (i.e., either us or our tenant) generally depends on the applicable lease, but we may incur costs if the tenant is responsible and does not comply. As of December 31, 2021, we have not been notified by any governmental authority, nor are we otherwise aware, of any non-compliance with the ADA that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations.

Table of Contents

Other Regulations

​

State and local governmental authorities regulate the use of our properties. While many of our leases mandate that the tenant is primarily responsibe for complying with such regulations, the tenant’s failure to comply could result in the imposition of fines or awards of damages on us, as the property owner, or restrictions on the ability to conduct business on such properties.

Human Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2021, we had nine full-time employees (including five full-time executive officers), who devote substantially all of their business time to our activities. In addition, certain (i) executive, administrative, legal, accounting, clerical, property management, property acquisition, consulting (i.e., sale, leasing, brokerage, and mortgage financing), and construction supervisory services, which we refer to collectively as the “Services”, and (ii) facilities and other resources, are provided pursuant to a compensation and services agreement between us and Majestic Property Management Corp. Majestic Property is wholly owned by our vice chairman of the board and it provides compensation to certain of our executive officers.

In 2021, pursuant to the compensation and services agreement, we paid Majestic Property approximately $3.1 million for the Services plus $295,000 for our share of all direct office expenses, including rent, telephone, postage, computer services, internet usage and supplies. Included in the $3.1 million is $1.4 million for property management services—the amount for the property management services is based on 1.5% and 2.0% of the rental payments (including tenant reimbursements) actually received by us from net lease tenants and operating lease tenants, respectively. We do not pay Majestic Property with respect to properties managed by third parties. Based on our portfolio of properties at December 31, 2021, we estimate that the property management fee in 2022 will be approximately $1.3 million. See Notes 10 and 12 to our consolidated financial statements for information about the amounts paid to Majestic Property for the Services and equity awards to individuals performing Services.

We provide a competitive benefits program to help meet the needs of our employees. In addition to salaries, the program includes annual cash bonuses, stock awards, contributions to a pension plan, healthcare and insurance benefits, health savings accounts, paid time off, family leave and an education benefit. Employees are offered great flexibility to meet personal and family needs and regular opportunities to participate in professional development programs. Most of our employees have a long tenure with us, which we believe is indicative of our employees’ satisfaction with the work environment we provide.

We maintain a work environment that is free from discrimination or harassment on the basis of color, race, sex, national origin, ethnicity, religion, age, disability, sexual orientation, gender identification or expression or any other status protected by applicable law, and our employees are compensated without regard to any of the foregoing.

Table of Contents

Lawrence G. Ricketts, Jr. Mr. Ricketts has been our Chief Operating Officer since 2008, Vice President from 1999 through 2006 and Executive Vice President since 2006.

David W. Kalish. Mr. Kalish has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since 1990 and as Senior Vice President, Finance of BRT Apartments Corp. since 1998. Since 1990, he has served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the managing general partner of Gould Investors L.P. Mr. Kalish is a certified public accountant.

Mark H. Lundy. Mr. Lundy has served as our Vice President since 2000 and as our Senior Vice President since 2006. Mr. Lundy has been a Vice President of BRT Apartments Corp. from 1993 to 2006, its Senior Vice President since 2006, a Vice President of the managing general partner of Gould Investors from 1990 through 2012 and its President and Chief Operating Officer since 2013. He is an attorney admitted to practice in New York and the District of Columbia.

Israel Rosenzweig. Mr. Rosenzweig has served as our Senior Vice President since 1997, as Chairman of the Board of Directors of BRT Apartments Corp. since 2013, as Vice Chairman of its Board of Directors from 2012 through 2013, and as its Senior Vice President from 1998 through 2012. He has been a Vice President of the managing general partner of Gould Investors since 1997.

Karen Dunleavy. Ms. Dunleavy has served as our Senior Vice President, Financial since 2019, as our Vice President, Financial from 1994 through 2019, and as Treasurer of the managing general partner of Gould Investors from 1986 through 2013. Ms. Dunleavy is a certified public accountant.

Alysa Block. Ms. Block has been our Treasurer since 2007, and served as Assistant Treasurer from 1997 to 2007. Ms. Block has also served as the Treasurer of BRT Apartments Corp. from 2008 through 2013, and served as its Assistant Treasurer from 1997 to 2008.

Richard M. Figueroa. Mr. Figueroa has served as our Senior Vice President since 2019, as Vice President from 2001 through 2019, as Vice President of BRT Apartments Corp. from 2002 through 2019 and as Vice President of the managing general partner of Gould Investors since 1999. Mr. Figueroa is an attorney admitted to practice in New York.

Isaac Kalish. Mr. Kalish has served as our Vice President since 2013, Assistant Treasurer since 2007, as Assistant Treasurer of the managing general partner of Gould Investors from 2012 through 2013, as Treasurer from 2013, as Vice President and Treasurer of BRT Apartments Corp. since 2013, and as its Assistant Treasurer from 2009 through 2013. Mr. Kalish is a certified public accountant.

Justin Clair. Mr. Clair has been employed by us since 2006, served as Assistant Vice President from 2010 through 2014, as Vice President from 2014 through 2019, and as Senior Vice President - Acquisitions, since 2019.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Distributors, Dufresne Spencer Group, and FedEx) at seven properties that account for 9.2% of 2022 contractual rental income. From 2026 through 2027, leases with respect to 38 tenants that account for 24.9% of our 2022 contractual rental income, expire. If our tenants, and in particular, our significant tenants, (i) do not renew their leases upon the expiration of same, (ii) default on their obligations or (iii) seek rent relief, lease renegotiation or other accommodations, our revenues could decline and, in certain cases, co-tenancy provisions (i.e., a tenant’s right to reduce their rent or terminate their lease if certain key tenants vacate a property) may be triggered possibly allowing other tenants at the same property to reduce their rental payments or terminate their leases. At the same time, we would remain responsible for the payment of the mortgage obligations with respect to the related properties and would become responsible for the operating expenses related to these properties, including, among other things, real estate taxes, maintenance and insurance. In addition, we may incur expenses in enforcing our rights as landlord. Even if we find replacement tenants or renegotiate leases with current tenants, the terms of the new or renegotiated leases, including the cost of required renovations or concessions to tenants, or the expense of the reconfiguration of a tenant’s space, may be less favorable than current lease terms and could reduce the amount of cash available to meet expenses and pay dividends. If tenants facing financial difficulties default on their obligation to pay rent or do not renew their leases at lease expiration, our results of operations, cash flow and financial condition may be adversely affected.

Traditional retail tenants account for 27.4% of our 2022 contractual rental income and the competition that such tenants face from e-commerce retail sales could adversely affect our business.

Approximately 27.4% of our 2022 contractual rental income is derived from retail tenants, including 7.0% from tenants engaged in selling furniture (i.e., Havertys Furniture accounts for 6.1% of 2022 contractual rental income) and 3.1% from a tenant engaged in selling office supplies (i.e., Office Depot, a tenant at five properties, of which one property is currently closed but for which the tenant continues to pay rent). Because e-commerce retailers may be able to provide customers with better pricing and the ease, comfort and safety of shopping from their home or office, our retail tenants face increasing competition from e-commerce retailers, which competition may continue to accelerate as a result of the pandemic. The accelerating growth of e-commerce sales decreases the need for traditional retail outlets and reduce retailers’ space and property requirements. This adversely impacts our ability to rent space at our retail properties and increases competition for retail tenants thereby reducing the rent we would receive at these properties and adversely affect our results of operations, cash flow and financial condition.

Approximately 24.5% of our 2022 contractual rental income is derived from five tenants. The default, financial distress or failure of any of these tenants, or such tenant’s determination not to renew or extend their lease, could significantly reduce our revenues.

Havertys Furniture, FedEx, LA Fitness, Northern Tool and NARDA Holdings, Inc. account for approximately 6.1%, 5.2%, 4.7%, 4.4% and 4.1%, respectively, of our 2022 contractual rental income. The default, financial distress or bankruptcy of any of these or other significant tenants or such tenant’s determination not to renew or extend their lease, could significantly reduce our revenues, would cause interruptions in the receipt of, or the loss of, a significant amount of rental income and would require us to pay operating expenses (including real estate taxes) currently paid by the tenant. This could also result in the vacancy of the property or properties occupied by the defaulting or non-renewing tenant, which would significantly reduce our rental revenues and net income until the re-rental of the property or properties and could decrease the ultimate sale value of the property.

Write-offs of unbilled rent receivables and intangible lease assets will reduce our net income, total assets and stockholders’ equity and may result in breaches of financial covenants under our credit facility.

At December 31, 2021, the aggregate of our unbilled rent receivable and intangible lease assets is $35.0 million (including $20.7 million of intangible lease assets); five tenants (i.e., Northern Tools, FedEx, Famous Footwear, Applebees and LA Fitness) account for 35.9% of such sum. We are required to assess the collectability of our unbilled rent receivables and the remaining useful lives of our intangible lease assets. Such assessments take into consideration, among other things, a tenant’s payment history, financial condition, and the likelihood of collectability of future rent.  If we determine that the collectability of a tenant’s unbilled rent receivable is not probable or that the useful life of a tenant’s intangible lease asset has changed, write-offs would

Table of Contents

be required.  Such write-offs result in a reduction of our net income, total assets and stockholders’ equity and in certain circumstances may result in the breach of our financial covenants under the credit facility.

The concentration of our properties in certain states may make our revenues and the value of our portfolio vulnerable to adverse changes in local economic conditions.

Some of the properties we own are located in the same or a limited number of geographic regions. Approximately 55.5% of our 2022 contractual rental income is derived from properties located in eight states— South Carolina (9.7%), New York (9.5%), Texas (7.8%), Pennsylvania (6.7%), Georgia (5.7%), North Carolina (5.7%), New Jersey (5.2%) and Maryland (5.2%). As a result, a decline in the economic conditions in these states or in regions where our properties may be concentrated in the future, may have an adverse effect on the rental and occupancy rates for, and the property values of, these properties, which could lead to a reduction of our rental income and/or impairment charges.

Our portfolio of properties is concentrated in the industrial and retail real estate sectors, and our business would be adversely affected by an economic downturn in either of such sectors.

Approximately 57.8% and 27.4% of our 2022 contractual rental income is derived from industrial and retail tenants, respectively, and we are vulnerable to economic declines that negatively impact these sectors of the economy, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

​

Declines in the value of our properties could result in impairment charges.

If we are presented with indicators of impairment in the value of a particular property or group of properties, we will be required to perform an impairment analysis for such property or properties. If we determine that any of our properties at which indicators of impairment exist have undiscounted cash flows below the net book value of such property, we will be required to recognize an impairment charge for the difference between the fair value and the book value during the quarter in which we make such determination. Any impairment charge would reduce our net income and stockholder’s equity.

Our ability to fully control the maintenance of our net-leased properties may be limited.

The tenants of our net-leased properties are responsible for maintenance and other day-to-day management of the properties. If a property is not adequately maintained in accordance with the terms of the applicable lease, we may incur expenses for deferred maintenance or other liabilities once the property is no longer leased. While we visit our properties on an intermittent basis, these visits are not comprehensive inspections and deferred maintenance items may go unnoticed. While our leases generally provide for recourse against the tenant in these instances, a bankrupt or financially-troubled tenant may be more likely to defer maintenance, and it may be more difficult to enforce remedies against such a tenant.

A significant portion of our leases are long-term and do not have fair market rental rate adjustments, which could negatively impact our income and reduce the amount of funds available to make distributions to stockholders.

A significant portion of our rental income comes from long-term net leases. There is an increased risk with long-term leases that the contractual rental increases in future years will fail to result in fair market rental rates during those years. If we do not accurately judge the potential for increases in market rental rates when negotiating these long-term leases or if we are unable to obtain any increases in rental rates over the terms of our leases, significant increases in future property operating costs, to the extent not covered under the net leases, could result in us receiving less than fair value from these leases. As a result, our income and distributions to our stockholders could be lower than they would otherwise be if we did not engage in long-term net leases. In addition, increases in interest rates may also negatively impact the value of our properties that are subject to long-term leases. While a significant number of our net leases provide for annual escalations in the rental rate, the increase in interest rates may outpace the annual escalations.

Table of Contents

The pursuit of a re-development of a multi-tenant community shopping center located in Manahawkin, New Jersey owned by a joint venture may be unsuccessful or fail to meet our expectations.

A joint venture in which we are a 50% partner has been pursuing, since 2018, a re-development of the Manahawkin Property, a multi-tenant community shopping center located in Manahawkin, New Jersey. As a result of the related decrease in occupancy (i.e., an occupancy rate of 53.2% at December 31, 2021), the income and cash flow from this property is significantly lower than it was several years ago.

This re-development project may be unsuccessful or fail to meet our expectations due to a variety of risks and uncertainties including:

If this re-development is abandoned, further delayed or otherwise unsuccessful we may may be (i) required to take an impairment charge, including a write-off of capitalized soft costs of $571,000 related to the re-development and (ii) adversely affected. See “Item 2. Properties” and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Re-development of the Manahawkin Property” for further information about the Manahawkin Property.

Table of Contents

Risks Related to Our Financing Activities, Indebtedness and Capital Resources

If we are unable to refinance our mortgage loans at maturity, we may be forced to sell properties at disadvantageous terms, which would result in the loss of revenues and in a decline in the value of our portfolio.

We had, as of December 31, 2021, $399.7 million in mortgage debt outstanding (all of which is non-recourse subject to standard carve-outs) and our debt is 35.8% of our total market capitalization. The risks associated with our mortgage debt, include the risks that cash flow from properties securing the indebtedness and our available cash and cash equivalents will be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest.

Generally, only a portion of the principal of our mortgage indebtedness will be repaid prior to or at maturity and we do not plan to retain sufficient cash to repay such indebtedness at maturity. Accordingly, to meet these obligations if they cannot be refinanced at maturity, we will have to use funds available under our credit facility, if any, and our available cash and cash equivalents to pay our mortgage debt or seek to raise funds through the financing of unencumbered properties, sale of properties or the issuance of additional equity. From 2022 through 2026, approximately $205.1 million of our mortgage debt matures—specifically, $44.8 million in 2022, $25.8 million in 2023, $62.6 million in 2024, $42.6 million in 2025 and $29.3 million in 2026. If we are unsuccessful in refinancing or extending existing mortgage indebtedness or financing unencumbered properties, selling properties on favorable terms or raising additional equity, our cash flow will be insufficient to repay all maturing mortgage debt when payments become due, and we may be forced to dispose of properties on disadvantageous terms or convey properties secured by mortgages to the mortgagees, which would lower our revenues and the value of our portfolio.

We may find that the value of a property could be less than the mortgage secured by such property. We may also have to decide whether we should refinance or pay off a mortgage on a property at which the mortgage matures prior to lease expiration and the tenant may not renew the lease. In these types of situations, after evaluating various factors, including among other things, the tenant’s competitive position in the applicable sub-market, our and our tenant’s estimates of its prospects, consideration of alternative uses and opportunities to re-purpose or re-let the property, we may seek to renegotiate the terms of the mortgage, or to the extent that the loan is non-recourse and the terms of the mortgage cannot be satisfactorily renegotiated, forfeit the property by conveying it to the mortgagee and writing off our investment.

If our credit facility is not renewed, interest rates increase or credit markets tighten, it may be more difficult for us to secure financing, which may limit our ability to finance or refinance our real estate properties, reduce the number of properties we can acquire, sell certain properties, and decrease our stock price.

Our credit facility expires December 31, 2022. Among other things, we depend on the facility to allow us to acquire properties on an accelerated basis (hereby potentially making our offer to purchase a property more attractive than offers from competitors), without the delays that may be associated with traditional mortgage financing. We can provide no assurance that such facility will be renewed or that if renewed, that the terms thereof will not be less favorable than the terms of the current facility. The members of our lending consortium have agreed to merge with one another which, if completed, would reduce from four to two, the members of such consortium. The remaining two members of the lending consortium may, in connection with a renewal of the facility, be unwilling to maintain their current combined level of credit exposure to us and may reduce the amount available to be borrowed under the renewed facility. If this facility is not renewed on terms at least as favorable to us as currently in place, our liquidity and capital resource position may be adversely impacted.

​

Increases in interest rates or reduced access to credit markets may make it difficult for us to obtain financing, refinance mortgage debt, limit the mortgage debt available on properties we wish to acquire and limit the properties we can acquire. Even in the event that we are able to secure mortgage debt on, or otherwise finance our real estate properties, due to increased costs associated with securing financing and other factors beyond our control, we may be unable to refinance the entire outstanding loan balance or be subject to unfavorable terms (such as higher loan fees, interest rates and periodic payments). In addition, an increase in interest rates could decrease the amount third parties are willing to pay for our assets, thereby limiting our ability to reposition our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions.

​

Table of Contents

Interest rates have become increasingly volatile and during the three years ended December 31, 2021, the interest rate on the 10-year treasury notes ranged from 0.38% to 2.80%. At March 1, 2022, the interest rate on such notes was 1.73%. If we are required to refinance mortgage debt that matures over the next several years at higher interest rates than such mortgage debt currently bears, the funds available for dividends may be reduced. The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2021, the principal balance of the mortgage payments due at maturity on our properties and the weighted average interest rate thereon (dollars in thousands):

​

We manage a substantial portion of our exposure to interest rate risk by accessing debt with staggered maturities, obtaining fixed rate mortgage debt and by fixing the interest rate on variable rate debt through the use of interest rate swap agreements. However, no amount of hedging activity can fully insulate us from the risks associated with changes in interest rates. Swap agreements involve risk, including that counterparties may fail to honor their obligations under these arrangements, and these arrangements have caused us to pay higher interest rates on our debt obligations than would otherwise be the case. Failure to hedge effectively against interest rate risk could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Because REIT stocks are often perceived as high-yield investments, investors may perceive less relative benefit to owning REIT stocks as interest rates and the yield on government treasuries and other bonds increase. Accordingly, the increase in interest rates over the past several months may reduce the amount investors are willing to pay for our common stock.

If our borrowings increase, the risk of default on our repayment obligations and our debt service requirements will also increase.

At December 31, 2021, we had $411.4 million of debt outstanding, including $399.7 million of mortgage debt and $11.7 million of debt incurred pursuant to our credit facility. Increased leverage, whether pursuant to our credit facility or mortgage debt, could result in increased risk of default on our payment obligations related to borrowings and in an increase in debt service requirements, which could reduce our net income and the amount of cash available to meet expenses and to pay dividends.

A breach of our credit facility could occur if a significant number of our tenants default or fail to renew expiring leases, or we take impairment charges against our properties.

Our credit facility includes covenants that require us to maintain certain financial ratios and comply with other requirements. If our tenants default under their leases or fail to renew expiring leases, generally accepted accounting principles may require us to recognize impairment charges against our properties, and our financial position could be adversely affected causing us to be in breach of the financial covenants contained in our credit facility.

Failure to meet interest and other payment obligations under our revolving credit facility or a breach by us of the covenants to maintain the financial ratios would place us in default under our credit facility, and, if the banks called a default and required us to repay the full amount outstanding under the credit facility, we might be required to rapidly dispose of our properties, which could have an adverse impact on the amounts we receive on such disposition. If we are unable to dispose of our properties in a timely fashion to the satisfaction of the banks, the banks could foreclose on that portion of our collateral pledged to the banks, which could result in the disposition of our properties at below market values. The disposition of our properties at below our carrying value would adversely affect our net income, reduce our stockholders’ equity and adversely affect our ability to pay dividends.

Table of Contents

The phasing out of LIBOR may adversely affect our cash flow and financial results.

At December 31, 2021, our variable rate debt that bears interest at the one month LIBOR rate plus a negotiated spread is in principal amount of $68.6 million (i.e., $56.9 million of mortgage debt and $11.7 million of credit facility debt). We hedged our exposure to the fluctuating interest payments on this mortgage debt by entering into interest rate swaps with the counterparties (or their affiliates) to such debt – these swaps effectively fix our interest payments under the related debt. At December 31, 2021, we have 19 swaps with three separate counterparties and an aggregate notional amount of $56.9 million. The fluctuating interest payments on the credit facility debt are not hedged. The authority regulating LIBOR announced it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after June 2023 and it is possible that LIBOR will become unavailable at an earlier date. Approximately $51.2 million of this mortgage debt and the related notional amount of interest rate swaps mature after June 2023. Accordingly, there is uncertainty as to how the interest rate on this mortgage debt, the related swaps and the credit facility debt will be determined when LIBOR is unavailable. Though these agreements, and instruments provide for alternative methods of calculating the interest rate if LIBOR is unavailable, such alternative rates may be unavailable (or the alternative rate provided for in the variable rate mortgage debt may be inconsistent with the alternative rate provided for by the related swap), in which case we may have to negotiate an alternative rate with the counterparties to such debt, the related swaps and the credit facility debt - we can provide no assurance that we and our counterparties will be able to agree to alternative rates. Even if alternative rates are available, the swaps may not effectively hedge our interest payment obligation on this variable rate mortgage debt and may result in fluctuating interest payments with respect to such debt. Our cash flow and financial results may be adversely affected if we are unable to arrange a mutually satisfactory alternative rate to LIBOR for our variable rate mortgage debt and the credit facility debt. Further, the absence of LIBOR or a generally acceptable alternative thereto may make it difficult to hedge our interest rate exposure on variable rate mortgage debt that we incur in the future which in turn may make it more difficult to acquire properties.

Certain of our net leases and our ground leases require us to pay property related expenses that are not the obligations of our tenants.

Under the terms of substantially all of our net leases, in addition to satisfying their rent obligations, our tenants are responsible for the payment of real estate taxes, insurance and ordinary maintenance and repairs. However, under the provisions of certain net and ground leases, we are required to pay some expenses, such as the costs of environmental liabilities, roof and structural repairs, insurance premiums, certain non-structural repairs and maintenance. If our properties incur significant expenses that must be paid by us under the terms of our leases, our business, financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected and the amount of cash available to meet expenses and pay dividends may be reduced.

Our failure to comply with our obligations under our mortgages may reduce our stockholders’ equity, and adversely affect our net income and ability to pay dividends.

Several of our mortgages include covenants that require us to maintain certain financial ratios, including various coverage ratios, and comply with other requirements. Failure to meet interest and other payment obligations under these mortgages or a breach by us of the covenants to comply with certain financial ratios would place us in non-compliance under such mortgages. If a mortgagee called a default and required us to repay the full amount outstanding under such mortgage, we might be required to rapidly dispose of the property subject to such mortgage which could have an adverse impact on the amounts we receive on such disposition. If we are unable to satisfy the covenants of a mortgage, the mortgagee could exercise remedies available to it under the applicable mortgage and as otherwise provided by law, including the possible appointment of a receiver to manage the property, application of deposits or reserves maintained under the mortgage for payment of the debt, or foreclose and/or cause the forced sale of the property or asset securing such debt. A foreclosure or other forced disposition of our assets could result in the disposition of same at below the carrying value of such asset. The disposition of our properties or assets at below our carrying value may adversely affect our net income, reduce our stockholders’ equity and adversely affect our ability to pay dividends.

​

Table of Contents

Risks Related to Real Estate Investments

Our revenues and the value of our portfolio are affected by a number of factors that affect investments in leased real estate generally.

We are subject to the general risks of investing in leased real estate. These include the non-performance of lease obligations by tenants, leasehold improvements that will be costly or difficult to remove should it become necessary to re-rent the leased space for other uses, covenants in certain retail leases that limit the types of tenants to which available space can be rented (which may limit demand or reduce the rents realized on re-renting), rights to terminate leases due to co-tenancy provisions, events of casualty or condemnation affecting the leased space or the property or due to interruption of the tenant’s quiet enjoyment of the leased premises, obligations of a landlord to restore the leased premises or the property following events of casualty or condemnation, adverse changes in economic conditions and local conditions (e.g., changing demographics, retailing trends and traffic patterns), declines in rental rates, changes in the supply and price of quality properties and the market supply and demand of competing properties, the impact of environmental laws, security concerns, prepayment penalties applicable under mortgage financings, changes in tax, zoning, building code, fire safety and other laws and regulations, the type of insurance coverage available, and changes in the type, capacity and sophistication of building systems. The occurrence of any of these events could adversely impact our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

Real estate investments are relatively illiquid and their values may decline.

Real estate investments are relatively illiquid. Therefore, we will be limited in our ability to reconfigure our real estate portfolio in response to economic changes. We may encounter difficulty in disposing of properties when tenants vacate either at the expiration of the applicable lease or otherwise. If we decide to sell any of our properties, our ability to sell these properties and the prices we receive on their sale may be affected by many factors, including the number of potential buyers, the number of competing properties on the market and other market conditions, as well as whether the property is leased and if it is leased, the terms of the lease. As a result, we may be unable to sell our properties for an extended period of time without incurring a loss, which would adversely affect our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

Uninsured and underinsured losses may affect the revenues generated by, the value of, and the return from a property affected by a casualty or other claim.

Most of our tenants obtain, for our benefit, comprehensive insurance covering our properties in amounts that are intended to be sufficient to provide for the replacement of the improvements at each property. However, the amount of insurance coverage maintained for any property may be insufficient (i) to pay the full replacement cost of the improvements at the property following a casualty event or (ii) if coverage is provided pursuant to a blanket policy and the tenant’s other properties are subject to insurance claims. In addition, the rent loss coverage under the policy may not extend for the full period of time that a tenant may be entitled to a rent abatement as a result of, or that may be required to complete restoration following, a casualty event. In addition, there are certain types of losses, such as those arising from earthquakes, floods, hurricanes and terrorist attacks, that may be uninsurable or that may not be economically insurable. Changes in zoning, building codes and ordinances, environmental considerations and other factors also may make it impossible or impracticable for us to use insurance proceeds to replace damaged or destroyed improvements at a property. If restoration is not or cannot be completed to the extent, or within the period of time, specified in certain of our leases, the tenant may have the right to terminate the lease. If any of these or similar events occur, it may reduce our revenues, the value of, or our return from, an affected property.

We have been, and will continue to be, subject to significant competition and we may not be able to compete successfully for investments.

We have been, and will continue to be, subject to significant competition for attractive investment opportunities, and in particular, opportunities for industrial properties which are the primary focus of our and many of our competitors acquisition efforts. Our competitors include publicly-traded REITs, non-traded REITs, insurance companies, commercial and investment banking firms, private institutional funds, hedge funds, private

Table of Contents

equity funds and other investors, many of whom have greater financial and other resources than we have. We may not be able to compete successfully for investments. If we pay higher prices for investments, our returns may be lower and the value of our assets may not increase or may decrease significantly below the amount we paid for such assets. If such events occur, we may experience lower returns on our investments.

Our current and future investments in joint ventures could be adversely affected by the lack of sole decision making authority, reliance on joint venture partners’ financial condition or insurance coverage, disputes that may arise between our joint venture partners and us and our reliance on one significant joint venture partner.

Six properties in which we have an interest are owned through consolidated joint ventures (three properties) and unconsolidated joint ventures (three properties). We may continue to acquire properties through joint ventures and/or contribute some of our properties to joint ventures. Investments in joint ventures may, under certain circumstances, involve risks not present when a third party is not involved, including the possibility that joint venture partners might file for bankruptcy protection, fail to fund their share of required capital contributions or obtain insurance coverage pursuant to a blanket policy as a result of which claims with respect to other properties covered by such policy and in which we have no interest could reduce or eliminate the coverage available with respect to the joint venture properties. Further, joint venture partners may have conflicting business interests or goals, and as a result there is the potential risk of impasses on decisions, such as a sale and the timing thereof. Any disputes that may arise between joint venture partners and us may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and prevent our officers and/or directors from focusing their time and effort on our business. Consequently, actions by or disputes with joint venture partners might result in subjecting properties owned by the joint venture to additional risk. With respect to our (i) consolidated joint ventures, we own, with two joint venture partners and their respective affiliates, properties that account for 4.0% of 2022 contractual rental income, and (ii) unconsolidated joint ventures, we own, with two joint venture partners and their affiliates, properties which account for our $1.6 million share of 2022 base rent payable. We may be adversely affected if we are unable to maintain a satisfactory working relationship with these joint venture partners or if any of these partners becomes financially distressed.

Regulatory and Tax Risks

Compliance with environmental regulations and associated costs could adversely affect our results of operations and liquidity.

Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, an owner or operator of real property may be required to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum product releases at the property and may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage and for investigation and cleanup costs incurred in connection with contamination. The cost of investigation, remediation or removal of hazardous or toxic substances may be substantial, and the presence of such substances, or the failure to properly remediate a property, may adversely affect our ability to sell or rent the property or to borrow money using the property as collateral. In connection with our ownership, operation and management of real properties, we may be considered an owner or operator of the properties and, therefore, potentially liable for removal or remediation costs, as well as certain other related costs, including governmental fines and liability for injuries to persons and property, not only with respect to properties we own now or may acquire, but also with respect to properties we have owned in the past.

We cannot provide any assurance that existing environmental studies with respect to any of our properties reveal all potential environmental liabilities, that any prior owner of a property did not create any material environmental condition not known to us, or that a material environmental condition does not otherwise exist, or may not exist in the future, as to any one or more of our properties. If a material environmental condition does in fact exist, or exists in the future, the remediation costs could have a material adverse impact upon our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

Table of Contents

Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act could be costly.

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, all public accommodations must meet Federal requirements for access and use by disabled persons. A determination that our properties do not comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act could result in liability for both governmental fines and damages. If we are required to make unanticipated major modifications to any of our properties to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, which are determined not to be the responsibility of our tenants, we could incur unanticipated expenses that could have an adverse impact upon our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

Legislative or regulatory tax changes could have an adverse effect on us.

There are a number of issues associated with an investment in a REIT that are related to the Federal income tax laws, including, but not limited to, the consequences of our failing to continue to qualify as a REIT. At any time, the Federal income tax laws governing REITs or the administrative interpretations of those laws may be amended or modified. Any new laws or interpretations may take effect retroactively and could adversely affect us or our stockholders.

Risks Related to OLP’s Organization, Structure and Ownership of Stock

Our transactions with affiliated entities involve conflicts of interest.

From time to time we have entered into transactions with persons and entities affiliated with us and with certain of our officers and directors. Such transactions involve a potential conflict of interest, and entail a risk that we could have obtained more favorable terms if we had entered into such transaction with an unaffiliated third party. We are a party to a compensation and services agreement with Majestic Property effective as of January 1, 2007, as amended. Majestic Property is wholly-owned by the vice chairman of our board of directors and it provides compensation to certain of our part-time senior executive officers and other individuals performing services on our behalf. Pursuant to the compensation and services agreement, we pay an annual fee to Majestic Property which provides us with the Services. See “Item 1. Business – Human Capital Resources”. In 2021 we paid, and in 2022 we anticipate paying, Majestic Property, (i) a fee of $3.1 million and $3.0 million, respectively, and (ii) $295,000 and $317,000, respectively, for our share of all direct office expenses, including rent, telephone, postage, computer services, supplies, and internet usage. We also obtain our property insurance in conjunction with Gould Investors L.P., our affiliate, and in 2021, reimbursed Gould Investors $1.4 million for our share of the insurance premiums paid by Gould Investors. At December 31, 2021, Gould Investors beneficially owns approximately 9.2% of our outstanding common stock and certain of our senior executive officers are also executive officers of the managing general partner of Gould Investors. See Note 10 of our consolidated financial statements for information regarding equity awards to individuals performing services on our behalf pursuant to the compensation and services agreement.

Our senior management and other key personnel, including those performing services on a part-time basis, are critical to our business and our future success depends on our ability to retain them.

We depend on the services of Matthew J. Gould, chairman of our board of directors, Fredric H. Gould, vice chairman of our board of directors, Patrick J. Callan, Jr., our president and chief executive officer, Lawrence G. Ricketts, Jr., our executive vice president and chief operating officer, and David W. Kalish, our senior vice president and chief financial officer, and other members of senior management to carry out our business and investment strategies. Of the foregoing executive officers, only Messrs. Callan and Ricketts, devote all of their business time to us. Other members of senior management provide services to us either on a full-time or part-time, as-needed basis. The loss of the services of any of our senior management or other key personnel, the inability or failure of the members of senior management providing services to us on a part-time basis to devote sufficient time or attention to our activities or our inability to recruit and retain qualified personnel in the future, could impair our ability to carry out our business and investment strategies.

Table of Contents

Certain provisions of our charter, our Bylaws, as amended, and Maryland law may inhibit a change in control that stockholders consider favorable and could also limit the market price of our common stock.

Certain provisions of our charter (the “Charter”), our Bylaws and Maryland law may impede, or prevent, a third party from acquiring control of us without the approval of our board of directors. These provisions:

Certain provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”) may impede a third party from making a proposal to acquire us or inhibit a change of control under circumstances that otherwise could be in the best interest of holders of shares of our common stock, including:

Ownership of less than 9.9% of our outstanding stock could violate the restrictions on ownership and transfer in our Charter, which would result in the shares owned or acquired in violation of such restrictions being designated as “excess shares” and transferred to a trust for the benefit of a charitable beneficiary and loss of the right to receive dividends and other distributions on, and the economic benefit of any appreciation of, such shares, and you may not have sufficient information to determine at any particular time whether an acquisition of our shares will result in a loss of the economic benefit of such shares.

In order for us to qualify as a real estate investment trust under the Code, no more than 50% of the value of the outstanding shares of our stock may be owned, directly or indirectly or through application of certain attribution rules, by five or fewer “individuals” (as defined in the Code) at any time during the last half of a taxable year. To facilitate our qualification as a REIT under the Code, among other purposes, the Charter generally prohibits any person other than Fredric H. Gould, currently vice chairman of our board of directors, from actually or constructively owning more than 9.9% of the outstanding shares of all classes and series of our stock, which we refer to as the “ownership limit.” In addition, the Charter prohibits any person from beneficially or constructively owning shares of our stock that would result in more than 50% of the value of the outstanding shares of our stock to be beneficially owned by five or fewer individuals, regardless of whether such ownership is during the last half of any taxable year, which we refer to as the “Five or Fewer Limit.” Shares transferred in violation of either of these restrictions will be designated automatically as “excess shares” and transferred to a trust for the benefit of a charitable beneficiary selected by us. The person that attempted to acquire the shares of our stock in violation of the restrictions in the Charter will not be entitled to any dividends or distributions paid after the date of the transfer to the trust and, upon a sale of such shares by the trust, will generally be entitled to receive only the lesser of the market value on the date of the event that resulted in the transfer to the trust or the net proceeds of the sale by the trust to a person who could own the shares without violating the ownership limits.

Table of Contents

Pursuant to the attribution rules under the Code, Fredric H. Gould, is our only stockholder that beneficially owned in excess of 9.9% of our capital stock on June 14, 2005, when the ownership limit became effective, and is the only person permitted to own and acquire shares of our capital stock, directly or indirectly, in excess of the ownership limit. Based on information supplied to us, as of December 31, 2021, Mr. Gould beneficially owns approximately 11.698% of the outstanding shares of our stock. As a result of Mr. Gould’s beneficial ownership of our stock, compliance with the 9.9% ownership limit will not ensure that your ownership of shares of our stock will not violate the Five or Fewer Limit or prevent shares of stock that you intended to acquire from being designated as “excess shares” and transferred to a charitable trust.

At December 31, 2021, if three other individuals unrelated to Mr. Gould were to beneficially own exactly 9.9% of our outstanding stock, no other individual may beneficially own 8.602% or more of our outstanding stock without violating the Five or Fewer Limit and causing the newly-acquired shares to be designated as “excess shares” and transferred to the charitable trust. However, there is no limitation on Mr. Gould acquiring additional shares of our stock or otherwise increasing his percentage of ownership of our stock, meaning that the amount of our stock that other persons or entities may acquire without potentially violating the Five or Fewer Limit could be reduced in the future and without notice. Our Board has exempted from the 9.9% ownership limit the ownership by Mr. Gould’s direct and indirect heirs of shares of our stock that they inherit from him, subject to the same conditions and limitations as apply to Mr. Gould.

Fredric H. Gould and his heirs will be required by the Exchange Act and regulations promulgated thereunder to report, with certain exceptions, their acquisition of additional shares of our stock within two days of such acquisitions, and all holders of our stock will be required to file reports of their acquisition of beneficial ownership (as defined in the Exchange Act) of more than 5% of our outstanding stock. However, beneficial ownership for purposes of the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act is calculated differently than beneficial ownership for purposes of determining compliance with the Five or Fewer Limit. As a result, you may not have enough information currently available to you at any time to determine the percentage of ownership of our stock that you can acquire without violating the Five or Fewer Limit and losing the economic benefit of the ownership of such newly-acquired shares.

Failure to qualify as a REIT could result in material adverse tax consequences and could significantly reduce cash available for distributions.

We operate so as to qualify as a REIT under the Code. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of technical and complex legal provisions for which there are limited judicial and administrative interpretations. The determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control may affect our ability to qualify as a REIT. In addition, no assurance can be given that legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions will not significantly change the tax laws with respect to qualification as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of such qualification. If we fail to quality as a REIT, we will be subject to federal, certain additional state and local income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and would not be allowed a deduction in computing our taxable income for amounts distributed to stockholders. In addition, unless entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions, we would be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification is lost. The additional tax would reduce significantly our net income and the cash available to pay dividends.

We are subject to certain distribution requirements that may result in our having to borrow funds at unfavorable rates.

To obtain the favorable tax treatment associated with being a REIT, we generally are required, among other things, to distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our ordinary taxable income (subject to certain adjustments) each year. To the extent that we satisfy these distribution requirements, but distribute less than 100% of our taxable income we will be subject to Federal and state corporate tax on our undistributed taxable income.

As a result of differences in timing between the receipt of income and the payment of expenses, and the inclusion of such income and the deduction of such expenses in arriving at taxable income, and the effect of nondeductible capital expenditures and the timing of required debt service (including amortization) payments, we

Table of Contents

may need to borrow funds in order to make the distributions necessary to retain the tax benefits associated with qualifying as a REIT, even if we believe that then prevailing market conditions are not generally favorable for such borrowings. Such borrowings could reduce our net income and the cash available to pay dividends.

Compliance with REIT requirements may hinder our ability to maximize profits.

In order to qualify as a REIT for Federal income tax purposes, we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, our sources of income, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders and the ownership of our stock. We may also be required to make distributions to stockholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution. Accordingly, compliance with REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.

In order to qualify as a REIT, we must also ensure that at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and real estate assets. Any investment in securities cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, no more than 5% of the value of our assets can consist of the securities of any one issuer, other than a qualified REIT security. If we fail to comply with these requirements, we must dispose of such portion of these securities in excess of these percentages within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter in order to avoid losing our REIT status and suffering adverse tax consequences. This requirement could cause us to dispose of assets for consideration that is less than their true value and could lead to an adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

If we reduce or do not increase our dividend, the market value of our common stock may decline.

The level of our dividend is established by our board of directors from time to time based on a variety of factors, including our cash available for distribution, funds from operations, adjusted funds from operations and maintenance of our REIT status. Various factors could cause our board of directors to decrease or not increase our dividend, including tenant defaults or bankruptcies resulting in a material reduction in our funds from operations, a material loss resulting from an adverse change in the value of one or more of our properties, or insufficient income to cover our dividends. In 2020 and 2019, approximately 8.1% and 27.0%, respectively, of our dividends exceeded our “earnings and profits” (as determined pursuant to the Code) and therefor constituted a return of capital; accordingly, we were not required to pay dividends that exceeded such earnings and profits to maintain our REIT status. It is possible that a portion of the dividends we would pay in 2022 would constitute a return of capital and in such event we would not be required to pay such sum to maintain our REIT status. If our board of directors determines to reduce or not increase our dividend for the foregoing or any other reason, the market value of our common stock could be adversely affected.

General Business Risks

Breaches of information technology systems could materially harm our business and reputation

We collect and retain on information technology systems, certain financial, personal and other sensitive information provided by third parties, including tenants, vendors and employees. We also rely on information technology systems for the collection and distribution of funds. We have been, and continue to be, subject to cybersecurity attacks though we have not incurred any significant loss therefrom. There can be no assurance that we will be able to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive information or the unauthorized distribution of funds. Any loss of this information or unauthorized distribution of funds as a result of a cybersecurity attack may result in loss of funds to which we are entitled, legal liability and costs (including damages and penalties), as well as damage to our reputation, that could materially and adversely affect our business.

Actual or threatened epidemics, pandemics, outbreaks, or other public health crises may adversely affect our tenants’ financial condition and the profitability of our properties.

Our business and the businesses of our tenants could be materially and adversely affected by the risks, or the public perception of the risks, related to an epidemic, pandemic, outbreak, or other public health crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The risk, or public perception of the risk, of a pandemic or media coverage of infectious diseases could cause customers to avoid retail properties, and with respect to our properties generally,

Table of Contents

could cause temporary or long-term disruptions in our tenants’ supply chains and/or delays in the delivery of our tenants’ inventory. Moreover, an epidemic, pandemic, outbreak or other public health crisis, such as COVID-19, could cause the on-site employees of our tenants to avoid our tenants’ properties, which could adversely affect our tenants’ ability to adequately manage their businesses. Risks related to an epidemic, pandemic or other health crisis, such as COVID-19, could also lead to the complete or partial closure of one or more of our tenants’ stores or facilities. Such events could adversely impact our tenants’ sales and/or cause the temporary closure of our tenants’ businesses, which could severely disrupt their operations and the rental revenue we generate from our leases with them. The ultimate extent of the impact of any epidemic, pandemic or other health crisis on our business, financial condition and results of operations will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information that may emerge concerning the severity of such epidemic, pandemic or other health crisis and actions taken to contain or prevent their further spread, among others. These and other potential impacts of an epidemic, pandemic or other health crisis, such as COVID-19, could therefore materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The failure of any bank in which we deposit our funds could have an adverse impact on our financial condition.

We have diversified our cash and cash equivalents between several banking institutions in an attempt to minimize exposure to any one of these entities. However, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation only insures accounts in amounts up to $250,000 per depositor per insured bank. We currently have cash and cash equivalents deposited in certain financial institutions significantly in excess of federally insured levels. If any of the banking institutions in which we have deposited funds ultimately fails, we may lose our deposits over $250,000. The loss of our deposits may have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

We are dependent on third party software for our billing and financial reporting processes.

We are dependent on third party software, and in particular Yardi’s property management software, for generating tenant invoices and financial reports. If the software fails (including a failure resulting from such parties unwillingness or inability to maintain or upgrade the functionality of the software), our ability to bill tenants and prepare financial reports could be impaired which would adversely affect our business.

​

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents