Securities registered
or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Securities registered
or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Securities for which there is
a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None
Indicate the number
of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by
the annual report.
Indicate by check mark
if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
If this report is an
annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐.
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to submit such files). Yes ☐ No ☐ (Note: None required for registrant)
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company.
See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “emerging growth company”
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
If an emerging growth
company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected
not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant
to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal
control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting
firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐
Indicate by check mark
which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
If “Other”
has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has
elected to follow. Item 17 ☐ Item 18 ☐
If this is an annual
report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐
No ☒
Part
I
INTRODUCTION
Unless the context
otherwise requires, the term “BrasilAgro” refers to BrasilAgro – Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas
and its consolidated subsidiaries; and unless indicated otherwise, the terms “we,” the “Company,” “our”
or “us” refer to BrasilAgro. The term “Brazil” refers to The Federative Republic of Brazil.
Presentation of Financial Information
All references in this
annual report to “real,” “reais” or “R$” are to the Brazilian real, the official currency
of Brazil. All references to “dollars” or “US$” are to U.S. dollars, the official currency of the United
States of America.
On June 30, 2020, the
end of our last fiscal year, the exchange rate for reais into U.S. dollars was R$5.4760 to US$1.00, based on the selling
rate as reported by the Central Bank of Brazil (Banco Central do Brasil), or the Central Bank. On June 30, 2019, the selling
rate was R$3.8322 to US$1.00. The selling rate was R$3.8552 to US$1.00 on June 30, 2018, R$3.3082 to US$1.00 on June 30, 2017 and
R$3.2098 to US$1.00 on June 30, 2016, in each case, as reported by the Central Bank. The real/U.S. dollar exchange rate
fluctuates widely, and the selling rate on June 30, 2020 may not be indicative of future exchange rates. On September 30, 2020,
the selling rate was R$5.6407 to US$1.00 and, on October 28, 2020, the selling rate was R$5.7325 to US$1.00, as reported by the
Central Bank.
Financial Statements
The Brazilian real
is our functional currency and that of our subsidiaries located in Brazil, and is also the currency used for the preparation and
presentation of our consolidated financial statements. Our fiscal year is from July 1 of each year to June 30 of the following
year.
We prepare our annual
consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS, as issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board, or the IASB.
The selected financial
information should be read together with our audited consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, included elsewhere
in this annual report.
Crop Year, Harvest and Planting Season
Our agricultural production
is based on the crop year, which varies according to each crop. The crop year for sugarcane is from January 1 to December 31 of
each year, and the crop year for grains is from July 1 of each year to June 30 of the following year. We also make reference in
this annual report to the planting season and the harvest season, or harvest period. In Brazil, the planting season for grains
is from September to December of each year, and the planting season for sugarcane is from February to May of each year. The harvest
period in Brazil for grains is from February to July of each year, and such period for sugarcane is from April to November of each
year.
Market Information
The market information
included in this annual report concerning the Brazilian economy and the domestic and international agriculture industry was obtained
from market research, publicly available information and industry publications from established public sources, such as the Central
Bank, the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística), or the
IBGE, the Brazilian Food Supply Company (Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento), or Conab, which is a state-owned company,
the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply (Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento),
or MAPA, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, or USDA, the U.S. Food and Agriculture Organization, or FAO, the United Nations, and
the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, or OECD, as well as from other public institutions and independent sources
as indicated throughout this annual report. We believe that such information is true and accurate as of the date it was made available,
although we have not independently verified it.
Rounding
Certain percentages
and amounts included in this annual report have been rounded for ease of presentation. Accordingly, figures shown as totals in
certain tables may not be arithmetic aggregations of the figures that precede them.
Emerging Growth Company Status
We are an “emerging
growth company,” as defined in Section 3(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, as modified
by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act. Therefore, we are eligible to take advantage of certain exemptions
from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies,”
including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or any Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or “PCAOB,” rules, which,
if adopted in the future, would require mandatory audit firm rotation and auditor discussion and analysis pursuant to any future
audit rule promulgated by the PCAOB (unless the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, determines otherwise). We
take advantage of the exemption from providing an auditor’s attestation report and may decide to rely on other exemptions
in the future, such as compliance with certain PCAOB rules. We do not know if some investors will find our common stock less attractive
as a result. The result may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may become more volatile.
We could remain an
“emerging growth company” until the earliest of (a) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our annual gross
revenue exceeds US$1.07 billion, (b) the last day of our fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the date of our first sale
of our common equity securities pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the Securities Act, (c) the date on which we have issued more than US$1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three-year
period, or (d) the date on which we become a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange
Act, which would occur if the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds US$700 million as of the
last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter.
Forward-Looking Statements
This annual report
includes statements that constitute forward-looking statements. These statements are based on the beliefs and assumptions of our
management and on information available to our management at the time such statements were made. Forward-looking statements include,
but are not limited to: (a) information concerning possible or assumed future results of our operations, earnings, industry conditions,
demand and pricing for our services and other aspects of our business described under “Item 4—Information on the Company,”
“Item 5—Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and “Item 11—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
About Market Risk”; and (b) statements that are preceded or followed by, or include, the words “believes,” “expects,”
“anticipates,” “intends,” “is confident,” “plans,” “estimates,” “may,”
“might,” “could,” “will,” “would,” the negatives of such terms or similar expressions.
The forward-looking
statements included in this annual report relate to, among other factors:
|
●
|
our business prospects and future results of operations;
|
|
●
|
weather and other natural phenomena;
|
|
●
|
the length and severity of the recent novel coronavirus (COVID-19)
pandemic, or the COVID-19 pandemic;
|
|
●
|
developments in, or changes to, the laws, regulations and governmental
policies governing our business, including limitations on ownership of farmland by foreign entities in certain jurisdiction in
which we operate, environmental laws and regulations;
|
|
●
|
the implementation of our business strategy;
|
|
●
|
our plans relating to acquisitions, joint ventures, strategic alliances
or divestitures;
|
|
●
|
the implementation of our financing strategy and capital expenditure
plan;
|
|
●
|
the maintenance of relationships with our customers;
|
|
●
|
the competitive nature of the industry in which we operate;
|
|
●
|
the cost and availability of financing;
|
|
●
|
future demand for the commodities we produce;
|
|
●
|
international prices for commodities;
|
|
●
|
the condition of our land holdings;
|
|
●
|
the development of the logistics and infrastructure for transportation
of our products in the countries where we operate;
|
|
●
|
the performance of the Brazilian and world economies;
|
|
●
|
the relative value of the Brazilian real compared to other
currencies; and
|
|
●
|
the factors discussed under “Item 3—Key Information—3.D.
Risk Factors” in this annual report.
|
Forward-looking statements
are not guarantees of future performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Although we make such statements based
on assumptions that we believe to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from
our expectations. Many of the factors that will determine these results are beyond our ability to control or predict.
Any of the risk factors
described under “Item 3—Key Information—Risk Factors” and those described elsewhere in this annual report
or in our other filings with the SEC, among other things, could cause our results to differ from any results or conditions that
might be projected, forecasted or estimated by us in any such forward-looking statements.
We undertake no obligation
to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether because of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required
by applicable law or stock exchange regulation. Investors are cautioned not to put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.
ITEM 1—IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS,
SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2—OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED
TIMETABLE
Not applicable.
ITEM 3—KEY INFORMATION
|
A.
|
Selected
Consolidated Financial Data
|
We prepare our annual consolidated
financial statements in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB.
Due to the nature of
our business and the harvest periods in the locations where we operate, our fiscal year ends on June 30 of each year. References
in this annual report to a specific fiscal year relate to the fiscal year ended on June 30 of that calendar year, unless indicated
otherwise.
The selected financial
data has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017 and 2016, and for
each of the years ended June 30, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017 and 2016. The information set forth below is qualified by reference to,
and should be read in conjunction with, our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and also “Item
5—Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” included in this annual report.
Effects of the adoption
of the amendments to IAS 41 and IAS 16
In 2014, the IASB amended
IAS 16 and IAS 41, which distinguish bearer plants from other biological assets. Bearer plants are solely used to grow products
over their productive lives and are seen to be similar to an item of property, plant and equipment under the scope of IAS 16, rather
than other biological assets that falls under the scope of IAS 41. However, the agricultural products growing on bearer plants
remain within the scope of IAS 41 and are measured at fair value less cost to sell. The amendments were applicable as from our
fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.
Our sugarcane plantations
qualify as bearer plants under the new definition in IAS 41. As required under IAS 8, “Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting
Estimates and Errors,” we effected the change in accounting policy retrospectively as of July 1, 2014. The standard became
effective as from our fiscal year commencing on July 1, 2016 and, consequently, our sugarcane was reclassified to property, plant
and equipment, measured at cost and depreciated over its useful life on a straight-line basis. We adopted the transitional rule
provided for in the amendment, which allowed us to apply the fair value of bearer plants as their deemed cost as of July 1, 2014.
Accordingly, we revised the comparative financial data amounts for the year ended June 30, 2016.
In order to improve
the presentation of leases payable in the statement of financial position starting in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, all
lease payables are presented under “leases payable.” For comparability purposes, leases payable that were presented
under “trade accounts payable and others” and under “finance leases” as of June 30, 2019 were also reclassified
under “leases payable.” See Note 2.1 to the financial statements included in this annual report. Accordingly, financial
data as of June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 have not been revised, and are not comparable to the financial data as of June 30, 2020
and 2019.
|
|
Year ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
(in R$ thousands, except share and per share information)
|
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
487,568
|
|
|
|
357,910
|
|
|
|
244,278
|
|
|
|
146,911
|
|
|
|
147,128
|
|
Gain on sale of farms
|
|
|
61,420
|
|
|
|
142,812
|
|
|
|
39,817
|
|
|
|
26,716
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural products
|
|
|
160,371
|
|
|
|
56,718
|
|
|
|
99,083
|
|
|
|
12,266
|
|
|
|
(12,632
|
)
|
Adjustments to net realizable value of agricultural products after harvest, net
|
|
|
(4,153
|
)
|
|
|
(2,040
|
)
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
(1,655
|
)
|
|
|
659
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
(483,813
|
)
|
|
|
(319,214
|
)
|
|
|
(228,319
|
)
|
|
|
(136,362
|
)
|
|
|
(134,714
|
)
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
221,393
|
|
|
|
236,186
|
|
|
|
155,742
|
|
|
|
47,876
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
Selling expenses
|
|
|
(14,300
|
)
|
|
|
(10,536
|
)
|
|
|
(10,087
|
)
|
|
|
(6,676
|
)
|
|
|
(2,732
|
)
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(43,890
|
)
|
|
|
(38,812
|
)
|
|
|
(34,945
|
)
|
|
|
(30,941
|
)
|
|
|
(28,944
|
)
|
Other operating income (expenses), net
|
|
|
1,231
|
|
|
|
(1,064
|
)
|
|
|
35,432
|
|
|
|
(6,019
|
)
|
|
|
2,812
|
)
|
Share of (loss) profit of a joint venture
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
1,102
|
|
|
|
14,671
|
|
|
|
(4,425
|
)
|
|
|
(511
|
)
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
164,284
|
|
|
|
186,876
|
|
|
|
160,813
|
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
(28,934
|
)
|
Financial income
|
|
|
375,413
|
|
|
|
310,538
|
|
|
|
129,323
|
|
|
|
110,090
|
|
|
|
192,644
|
|
Financial expenses
|
|
|
(406,168
|
)
|
|
|
(297,616
|
)
|
|
|
(137,879
|
)
|
|
|
(76,646
|
)
|
|
|
(154,270
|
)
|
Financial (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(30,755
|
)
|
|
|
12,922
|
|
|
|
(8,566
|
)
|
|
|
33,444
|
|
|
|
38,374
|
|
Profit before income and social contribution taxes
|
|
|
133,529
|
|
|
|
199,798
|
|
|
|
152,257
|
|
|
|
33,259
|
|
|
|
9,440
|
|
Income and social contribution taxes
|
|
|
(13,975
|
)
|
|
|
(22,719
|
)
|
|
|
(25,919
|
)
|
|
|
(5,949
|
)
|
|
|
(1,451
|
)
|
Net Profit for the year
|
|
|
119,554
|
|
|
|
177,079
|
|
|
|
126,338
|
|
|
|
27,310
|
|
|
|
7,989
|
|
Profit attributable to equity holders of the parent
|
|
|
119,554
|
|
|
|
177,079
|
|
|
|
126,338
|
|
|
|
27,310
|
|
|
|
7,989
|
|
Issued shares at the fiscal year end
|
|
|
62,104,301
|
|
|
|
56,888,916
|
|
|
|
56,888,916
|
|
|
|
56,888,916
|
|
|
|
58,226,600
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
|
|
3.29
|
|
|
|
2.35
|
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
2.09
|
|
|
|
3.27
|
|
|
|
2.35
|
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
69,024
|
|
|
|
51,338
|
|
|
|
(2,264
|
)
|
|
|
65,051
|
|
|
|
(6,440
|
)
|
Net cash flows (used in) from investing activities
|
|
|
(29,295
|
)
|
|
|
(21,266
|
)
|
|
|
(65,700
|
)
|
|
|
(13,527
|
)
|
|
|
149,773
|
|
Net cash flows (used in) from financing activities
|
|
|
18,451
|
|
|
|
(27,621
|
)
|
|
|
125,414
|
|
|
|
(61,930
|
)
|
|
|
(164,749
|
)
|
|
|
Year
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
(in R$ thousands)
|
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
|
171,045
|
|
|
|
106,627
|
|
|
|
104,314
|
|
|
|
43,798
|
|
|
|
54,204
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,038
|
|
|
|
11,215
|
|
|
|
6,972
|
|
|
|
113,559
|
|
Accounts receivable
and others
|
|
|
183,350
|
|
|
|
125,320
|
|
|
|
95,176
|
|
|
|
54,026
|
|
|
|
31,072
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
138,778
|
|
|
|
97,068
|
|
|
|
69,622
|
|
|
|
22,658
|
|
|
|
18,197
|
|
Biological assets
|
|
|
115,553
|
|
|
|
99,881
|
|
|
|
61,993
|
|
|
|
38,260
|
|
|
|
22,285
|
|
Derivative financial
instruments
|
|
|
7,180
|
|
|
|
5,906
|
|
|
|
28,299
|
|
|
|
4,090
|
|
|
|
24,497
|
|
Transactions
with related parties
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
|
1,987
|
|
|
|
1,660
|
|
|
|
1,298
|
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
616,607
|
|
|
|
440,827
|
|
|
|
372,279
|
|
|
|
171,102
|
|
|
|
264,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
held for sale
|
|
|
25,857
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Biological assets
|
|
|
25,444
|
|
|
|
23,235
|
|
|
|
34,053
|
|
|
|
13,435
|
|
|
|
5,241
|
|
Restricted marketable
securities
|
|
|
5,044
|
|
|
|
9,114
|
|
|
|
18,226
|
|
|
|
17,088
|
|
|
|
20,353
|
|
Transactions with related
parties
|
|
|
1,511
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
35,640
|
|
|
|
44,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
23,282
|
|
|
|
20,510
|
|
|
|
32,742
|
|
|
|
53,780
|
|
|
|
55,594
|
|
Derivative financial
instruments
|
|
|
1,746
|
|
|
|
1,013
|
|
|
|
4,053
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Accounts receivable
and others
|
|
|
262,387
|
|
|
|
203,533
|
|
|
|
74,775
|
|
|
|
44,605
|
|
|
|
42,497
|
|
Investment properties
|
|
|
858,261
|
|
|
|
548,717
|
|
|
|
557,152
|
|
|
|
389,799
|
|
|
|
287,867
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
5,742
|
|
|
|
1,256
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
101,426
|
|
|
|
102,955
|
|
Property, plant and
equipment
|
|
|
115,925
|
|
|
|
107,852
|
|
|
|
84,830
|
|
|
|
54,745
|
|
|
|
27,803
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
1,469
|
|
|
|
1,557
|
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
3,450
|
|
Right-of-use
assets
|
|
|
101,093
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
non-current assets
|
|
|
1,401,904
|
|
|
|
916,787
|
|
|
|
807,320
|
|
|
|
712,191
|
|
|
|
590,123
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
|
2,044,368
|
|
|
|
1,357,614
|
|
|
|
1,179,599
|
|
|
|
883,293
|
|
|
|
855,002
|
|
Liabilities
and equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable
and others
|
|
|
111,170
|
|
|
|
92,954
|
|
|
|
106,445
|
|
|
|
55,615
|
|
|
|
26,602
|
|
Loans, financing and
debentures
|
|
|
217,274
|
|
|
|
76,608
|
|
|
|
68,412
|
|
|
|
56,620
|
|
|
|
51,615
|
|
Salaries and Payroll
obligations
|
|
|
19,600
|
|
|
|
17,093
|
|
|
|
14,300
|
|
|
|
11,513
|
|
|
|
8,856
|
|
Derivative financial
instruments
|
|
|
18,333
|
|
|
|
11,055
|
|
|
|
10,489
|
|
|
|
3,978
|
|
|
|
2,165
|
|
Payables for purchase
of farms
|
|
|
5,017
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
24,646
|
|
|
|
22,261
|
|
Transactions with related
parties
|
|
|
2,849
|
|
|
|
2,405
|
|
|
|
1,831
|
|
|
|
4,784
|
|
|
|
536
|
|
Leases payable
|
|
|
25,849
|
|
|
|
26,503
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Financial
leases
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,676
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
400,092
|
|
|
|
226,618
|
|
|
|
203,153
|
|
|
|
157,156
|
|
|
|
112,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable
and others
|
|
|
28,002
|
|
|
|
19,451
|
|
|
|
11,298
|
|
|
|
1,520
|
|
|
|
1,402
|
|
Loans, financing and
debentures
|
|
|
296,839
|
|
|
|
209,245
|
|
|
|
187,393
|
|
|
|
55,555
|
|
|
|
48,230
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
34,031
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Leases payable
|
|
|
126,514
|
|
|
|
20,943
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Financial leases
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
18,539
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Derivative financial
instruments
|
|
|
1,462
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,145
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,392
|
|
Provision for legal
claims
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
824
|
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
|
|
1,594
|
|
|
|
1,455
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
|
|
34,374
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
522,707
|
|
|
|
250,463
|
|
|
|
220,582
|
|
|
|
58,669
|
|
|
|
55,479
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
699,811
|
|
|
|
584,224
|
|
|
|
584,224
|
|
|
|
584,224
|
|
|
|
584,224
|
|
Capital reserve
|
|
|
(34,292
|
)
|
|
|
3,645
|
|
|
|
1,997
|
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
1,771
|
|
Treasury shares
|
|
|
(31,501
|
)
|
|
|
(35,208
|
)
|
|
|
(35,208
|
)
|
|
|
(36,797
|
)
|
|
|
(37,203
|
)
|
Income reserves
|
|
|
358,606
|
|
|
|
281,052
|
|
|
|
164,968
|
|
|
|
75,101
|
|
|
|
98,691
|
|
Additional dividends
proposed
|
|
|
13,606
|
|
|
|
7,944
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
comprehensive income
|
|
|
115,339
|
|
|
|
38,876
|
|
|
|
39,883
|
|
|
|
43,415
|
|
|
|
40,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
equity
|
|
|
1,121,569
|
|
|
|
880,533
|
|
|
|
755,864
|
|
|
|
667,468
|
|
|
|
687,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and equity
|
|
|
2,044,368
|
|
|
|
1,357,614
|
|
|
|
1,179,599
|
|
|
|
883,293
|
|
|
|
855,002
|
|
We have included in
this annual report information with respect to dividends and interest on shareholders’ equity paid to holders of our common
shares since the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 in reais and in U.S. dollars translated from reais at the commercial
market selling rate in effect as of the payment date under the caption “Item 8—Financial Information—Dividends
and Dividend Policy—Recent Dividend Payments.”
Exchange Rates
Our dividends, when
paid in cash, are denominated in reais. As a result, exchange rate fluctuations have affected and will affect the U.S. dollar
amounts received by holders of ADSs on conversion of such dividends by The Bank of New York, as the ADS depositary. The Bank of
New York converts dividends it receives from reais into U.S. dollars upon receipt, by sale or such other manner as it has
determined, and distributes such U.S. dollars to holders of ADSs, net of The Bank of New York’s expenses of conversion, any
applicable taxes and other governmental charges. Exchange rate fluctuations may also affect the U.S. dollar price of the ADSs.
The Brazilian government
may impose temporary restrictions on the conversion of reais into foreign currencies and on the remittance to foreign investors
of proceeds from their investments in Brazil. Brazilian law permits the government to impose these restrictions whenever it determines
there is an imbalance in Brazil’s balance of payments or reason to expect that one will occur.
On June 30, 2020, the
real/U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$5.4760 per US$1.00. On September 30, 2020, the real/U.S. dollar exchange rate
was R$5.6407 per US$1.00 and, on October 28, 2020, the selling rate was R$5.7325 to US$1.00.
|
B.
|
Capitalization
and Indebtedness
|
Not applicable.
|
C.
|
Reasons
for the offer and use of proceeds
|
Not applicable.
Risks Relating to our Business and Industry
We may be exposed to risks related
to health epidemics and pandemics, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
In December 2019, a
novel strain of coronavirus known as COVID-19 surfaced in Wuhan, China. The outbreak was declared a global pandemic by the World
Health Organization on March 11, 2020. The speed and extent of the spread of COVID-19, and the duration and intensity of resulting
business disruption and related financial and social impact are uncertain. We cannot foresee the extent, duration and the impacts
of the measures adopted by the Brazilian or other governments to control the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. There are no recent
comparable events that may guide us. Outbreaks of contagious diseases could have an adverse effect on our business and operations.
In March 2020, we developed
and implemented a plan comprised of certain measures to protect the health of our employees, prevent the spread of COVID-19 at
our facilities and mitigate its effects on our operations. These measures included:
|
●
|
the creation of a Prevention and Risk Committee to assess the overall
situation, propose and revise preventive measures and actions to minimize risks, and coordinate the implementation of action plans;
|
|
●
|
the adoption of a remote work policy for employees who are in certain
risk groups or who work at our corporate headquarters in São Paulo;
|
|
●
|
the implementation of certain measures and protocols to protect the
safety of all persons involved in our operations, pursuant to the guidelines of the Brazilian Ministry of Health (Ministério
da Saúde); and
|
|
●
|
the adoption of contingency plans to prevent disruption in our operations.
|
Our operations in Brazil
and Paraguay continued normally and, to date, we have not had had any material impact on our business and operations arising out
of the COVID-19 pandemic.
However, the COVID-19
pandemic could affect our operations if a significant portion of our workforce is unable to work due to the spread of the virus,
quarantines, government actions, the shutdown of facilities or other restrictions. Part of our revenue is generated by the sale
of commodities to local customers, but the global market for such commodities relies on an extensive logistics and supply chain,
including ports, distribution centers and suppliers. In addition, the high volatility of the Brazilian real/U.S. dollar
exchange rate and the prices of commodities as a result of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic could result in losses for us.
We have experienced
strong demand for exports because of the appreciation of the U.S. dollar against the Brazilian real. We have not experienced
any significant disruptions in our logistics and export operations, as well as in inbound shipments of raw materials and goods,
most of which had been acquired prior to the imposition of quarantine restrictions in Brazil. We have also not experienced any
material changes in commitments for the 2019/2020 crop year. Our management believes that we are well positioned to withstand the
effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.
We have preserved our
short-term and long-term liquidity, and changes in inbound and outbound shipments were scaled not to materially affect our financial
position. We did not identify any significant risks with regard to our capacity to continue operating.
We are unable to determine
the full extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic may impact our business or results of operations in the future, which will depend
on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted. See “—Risks Relating to Brazil—The
measures taken or to be implemented by the Brazilian government in response to the COVID-19 pandemic may have an adverse effect
on our business and operations.”
Our ability to implement our business
strategy successfully may be adversely affected by numerous factors beyond our control, which may materially and adversely affect
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business strategy
depends on our ability to acquire, develop, operate and sell our agricultural properties on a profitable basis. Our strategy is
based on our ability to acquire agricultural properties at attractive prices, develop them into efficient and profitable operations
and sell them at a profit in the medium and long term. These factors are essential for our prospects of success, but are subject
to significant uncertainties, contingencies and risks within our economic, competitive, regulatory and operational environment,
many of which are beyond our control. Our ability to execute our business strategy successfully is uncertain and may be adversely
affected by any of the following factors, among others:
|
●
|
failure to pursue our business strategy;
|
|
●
|
failure or difficult to acquire and sell agricultural properties at attractive prices;
|
|
●
|
changes in market conditions or failure to anticipate and adapt to new trends in Brazil’s rapidly evolving agricultural sector;
|
|
●
|
inability to overcome certain limitations on the acquisition of land in Brazil by foreigners, as provided in the opinion of the Federal Attorney General, as further detailed in this annual report;
|
|
●
|
failure to maintain the fiscal structure of our subsidiaries;
|
|
●
|
inability to develop infrastructure and attract or retain personnel in a timely and effective manner;
|
|
●
|
inability to identify service providers for our agricultural properties and projects;
|
|
●
|
increased competition for suitable land from other agricultural real estate owners or developers, which increases our costs and adversely affects our profit margins;
|
|
●
|
inability to develop and operate our agricultural properties profitably, which may result from inaccurate estimates regarding the cost of infrastructure, other investments or operating costs;
|
|
●
|
failure, delays or difficulties in obtaining necessary environmental and regulatory permits;
|
|
●
|
failure by purchasers of our properties to meet their payment obligations to us;
|
|
●
|
increased operating costs, including the need for improvements to fixed assets, insurance premiums and property and utility taxes and fees that affect our profit margins;
|
|
●
|
adverse climate conditions, such as global warming, which may contribute to the change of frequency of unpredictable or uncommon meteorological phenomena such as hurricanes and typhoons, as well as unpredictable and unusual patterns of rainfall, among others;
|
|
●
|
unfavorable climate conditions in Brazil or Paraguay, particularly in the regions where we carry out our activities;
|
|
●
|
the economic, political and business environment in Brazil or Paraguay, and specifically in the geographic regions where we invest and operate;
|
|
●
|
inflation, fluctuating interest rates and exchange rates;
|
|
●
|
disputes and litigation relating to our agricultural properties; and
|
|
●
|
labor, environmental, civil and pension liabilities.
|
We may not be able to continue acquiring
suitable agricultural properties on attractive terms.
In recent years, investments
in Brazil’s agriculture sector have increased substantially. As a result, demand and valuations for the kind of properties
we seek to acquire have escalated significantly. We believe that prices for such properties are likely to continue to increase
in the medium and long-term, perhaps significantly as demand is expected to remain high. We compete with local and foreign investors,
many of whom are larger and have greater financial resources than we do. Such investors may be able to incur operating losses for
a sustained period, retain their real estate investments for a longer period than we can or accept lower returns on such investments.
As a result, such investors may be willing to pay substantially higher prices for agricultural properties than we are able or willing
to, depriving us of opportunities to acquire the best agricultural properties or increasing our acquisition costs. As a result
of the foregoing, we cannot assure you that we will be able to locate and acquire suitable investments on reasonable terms or at
all, and our inability to do so would have a material adverse effect on us.
The imposition of restrictions on
acquisitions of agricultural properties by foreign nationals may materially restrict the development of our business.
In August 2010, the
then-president of Brazil approved the opinion of the Federal Attorney General affirming the constitutionality of Brazilian Law
No. 5,709/71, which imposes important limitations on the acquisition and lease of land in Brazil by foreigners and by Brazilian
companies controlled by foreigners. Pursuant to this legislation, companies that are majority-owned by foreigners are not allowed
to acquire agricultural properties in excess of 100 indefinite exploration modules, or MEI (which are measurement units adopted
by the National Institute of Agrarian Development (Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agrária,
or INCRA), within different Brazilian regions, and which range from five to 100 hectares) absent the prior approval of the Brazilian
Congress, while the acquisition of areas measuring less than 100 MEIs by such companies requires the prior approval of INCRA. In
addition, agricultural areas that are owned by foreigners or companies controlled by foreigners shall not exceed 25% of the surface
area of the municipality, of which area up to 40% shall not belong to foreigners or companies controlled by foreigners of the same
nationality, meaning that the sum of agricultural areas that belong to foreigners or companies controlled by foreigners of the
same nationality shall not exceed 10% of the surface area of the relevant municipality. In addition, INCRA is also required to
verify if the agricultural, cattle-raising, industrial or colonization projects to be developed in such areas were previously approved
by the relevant authorities. After that analysis, INCRA will issue a certificate allowing the acquisition or rural lease of the
property. The purchase and rural lease of agricultural properties that do not comply with the aforementioned requirements need
to be authorized by the Brazilian Congress. In both cases, it is not possible to determine an estimated time frame for the approval
procedure, since at the date of this annual report, there are no known cases on the grating of such certificates.
Recently, Brazilian
Law No. 13,986, of April 7, 2020, amended Law No. 5,709/91 and provided that the limitations mentioned above do not apply (i) to
the pledge of real estate as collateral (including the fiduciary transfer of real estate property); and (ii) to debt settlements
arising from the execution of real estate collateral. Both exceptions favor Brazilian companies controlled by foreigners or foreign
entities, which creates new business opportunities.
As of September 30,
2020, approximately 60.96% of our common shares were held by foreigners. Bearing that in mind, the implementation of Law No. 5,709/71
may impose on us additional procedures and approvals in connection with our future acquisitions of land, which may result in material
delays and our inability to obtain required approvals. There is also a case pending on the Supreme Court (Supremo Tribunal Federal,
or STF) on the Opinion No. 461/2012-E, issued by São Paulo’s General Controller of Justice (Corregedoria Geral
de Justiça do Estado de São Paulo), which has established that entities providing notary and registrar services
located in the State of São Paulo are exempt from observing certain restrictions and requirements imposed by Law No. 5,709/71
and Decree No. 74,965/74. Moreover, on April 16, 2015, the Brazilian Rural Society filed a claim for the acknowledgment of non-compliance
with basic principles (ADPF) under certain provisions of the Brazilian Constitution with the Supreme Court in order to (i) rule
that paragraph 1, article 1, of Law No. 5,709/71 was repealed by the 1988 Federal Constitution and (ii) reverse the opinion issued
by the Federal Attorney General (AGU) of 2010. As of the date hereof, we are not able to provide an estimate of the timeframe for
a final judgment to be issued by the STF in both cases.
Depending on the final
decisions of these pending lawsuits, we may need to modify our business strategy and intended practices in order to be able to
acquire agricultural properties. This might have the effect of increasing the number of transactions we must complete, which would
increase our transaction costs. It might also require the execution of joint ventures or shareholder agreements, which increases
the complexity and risks associated with such transactions.
Any regulatory limitations
and restrictions could materially limit our ability to acquire agricultural properties, increase the investments, transaction costs
or complexity of such transactions, or complicate the regulatory procedures required, any of which could materially and adversely
affect us and our ability to successfully implement our business strategy. For more information, see “Item 4—Information
on the Company—Business Overview—Ownership of Agricultural Land in Brazil by Foreigners.”
A substantial portion of our assets
consist of agricultural properties that are illiquid.
Our business strategy
is based on the appreciation of the capital invested in our agricultural properties and the liquidity of those investments. We
cannot assure you that the value of our agricultural properties will increase in the short-, medium- or long-term, or at all, or
that we will be able to monetize our agricultural investments successfully. Agricultural real estate assets are, as a general rule,
illiquid and volatile, and agricultural properties in Brazil are especially illiquid and volatile. As a result, it may be difficult
for us to promptly adjust our portfolio of properties in response to changes in economic or business conditions, and we may be
unable to find purchasers willing to acquire our agricultural properties at prices that are favorable to us. Lack of liquidity
and volatility in local market conditions would adversely affect our ability to carry out sales of properties on a timely and profitable
basis, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
We may not be profitable, or our
cash flow may not be positive for a number of years.
We expect to incur
significant capital and operating expenses for several years on account of our continuing development activities. Due to the capital-intensive
and long-term nature of our real estate development activities, many of our properties will not generate immediate cash flows or
provide a short-term return on investment. Therefore, we may not achieve positive cash flows or profitability for a number of years,
and, even if we do, we cannot assure you that such positive cash flows or profitability will be sustained in the future. Should
we fail to achieve and sustain profitability, our business, financial condition and results of operations and the market value
of our common shares would be adversely affected.
Fluctuation in market prices for
our agricultural products could adversely affect us.
We are not able to
obtain hedging protection or minimum price guarantees for the entirety of our production and therefore we are exposed to significant
risks associated with the level and volatility of crop prices. The prices we are able to obtain for our agricultural products from
time to time will depend on many factors beyond our control, including:
|
●
|
global
commodity prices, which historically have been subject to significant fluctuations over relatively short periods of time, depending
on worldwide food supply and demand as well as factors related to financial speculation;
|
|
●
|
disruptions
in commodity markets caused by global events, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic;
|
|
●
|
weather conditions, or natural disasters in areas where agricultural products are cultivated;
|
|
●
|
worldwide inventory levels (i.e., supply or stock of commodities carried over from year to year);
|
|
●
|
the business strategies adopted by other major companies operating in the agricultural and agribusiness sectors;
|
|
●
|
changes in agriculture subsidies with regard to certain important producers (mainly in the United States and the European Economic Community), trade barriers with regard to certain important consumer markets and the adoption of other government policies affecting market conditions and prices;
|
|
●
|
available transportation methods and infrastructure development in the regions where we operate or in remote areas serving local markets and which affect the local prices of our crops; and
|
|
●
|
cost of raw materials; and supply of and demand for competing commodities and substitutes.
|
Given the uncertainty
around the extent and timing of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, we are unable to predict or anticipate its final effects on our
business and results of operations. See “—We may be exposed to risks related to health epidemics and pandemics, such
as the COVID-19 pandemic, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.”
In addition, we believe
there is a close relationship between the value of our agricultural properties and market prices of the commodities we produce,
which are affected by global economic and other conditions. A decline in the prices of grains, sugar or related by-products below
their current levels for a sustained period of time would significantly reduce the value of our land holdings and materially and
adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Ethanol prices are correlated with
the price of sugar and are also closely correlated with the price of oil, so that a decline in the price of sugar or a decline
in the price of oil may adversely affect our sugarcane business.
A vast majority of
ethanol in Brazil is produced at sugarcane mills that produce both ethanol and sugar. Because sugarcane millers are able to alter
their product mix in response to the relative prices of ethanol and sugar, the prices of both products are directly correlated,
and the correlation between ethanol and sugar may increase over time. Sugar prices in Brazil are determined by prices in the world
market, resulting in a correlation between Brazilian ethanol prices and world sugar prices.
In addition, gasoline
prices in Brazil are controlled by the Brazilian government. Because flex-fuel vehicles, which have become popular in Brazil, allow
consumers to choose between gasoline and ethanol at the pump, ethanol prices are correlated to gasoline prices and, consequently,
oil prices.
Oil prices varied sharply
in 2020, with a record demand shock along with excess supply created by internal dispute among OPEC members. In March 2020, a dispute
between Saudi Arabia and Russia sparked oil price volatility. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic has led to unprecedented changes
in demand for oil.
A decline in sugar
prices could have an adverse effect on the financial performance of our sugarcane businesses.
Substantially all of our revenue
is derived from a small number of customers, and we currently face a risk of default by our main customer.
We currently sell a
substantial portion of our total crop production to a small number of customers who have considerable bargaining power. For instance,
in the year ended June 30, 2020, four of our customers were responsible for 72.8% of our revenue, and each of these four customers
was responsible for at least 10% of our revenue. Of these four customers, two were responsible for 100% of our revenue in the sugarcane
segment, and two were responsible for 61.2% of our revenue in the grains segment. Comparatively, in the year ended June 30, 2019,
four of our customers were responsible for 85% of our revenue, and each of these four customers was responsible for at least 10%
of our revenue. Of these four customers, two were responsible for 100% of our revenue in the sugarcane segment, and two were responsible
for 71% of our revenue in the grains segment. See Note 20 to our financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
Furthermore, we entered
into a supply contract and a rural partnership agreement with Brenco – Companhia Brasileira de Energia Renovável –
Em Recuperação Judicial (“Brenco”), which is controlled by Odebrecht S.A., pursuant to which we currently
supply them with 100% of our sugarcane production from Alto Taquari, Araucária and Partnership III farms. The term of this
supply contract covers two full crop cycles, which consists of six crop years and five harvests, and therefore is scheduled to
expire in crop year 2021/2022. The term of this rural partnership agreement covers a total area of 5,782 hectares, which we will
explore and operate until March 31, 2026.
In addition, we entered
into a supply contract and a rural partnership agreement with Agro Pecuária e Industrial Serra Grande Ltda. (“Agro
Serra”), pursuant to which we currently supply them with 100% of our sugarcane production from São José farm.
The term of this supply contract covers at least 15 crop years, and therefore is scheduled to expire no earlier than in crop year
2032/2033, and encompasses a total area of 14,900 hectares, which we will explore and operate.
In addition, the strong
competition between a relatively fragmented sector of agricultural producers in the internal and external markets further increases
the bargaining power of our highly concentrated customer base. Thus, we may not be able to maintain or form new relationships with
customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Concentration among
our customer base also increases the adverse consequences to us should we lose any of our customers or if any of our customers
defaults on their obligations to us, either in the form of non-payment or through a breach of any contractual provision or obligation,
such as shipping failure or delays. Delays in the shipment of our products could directly affect the planning of our harvest, which
could generate losses and result in additional costs to us.
In the year ended June
30, 2020 and as of the date hereof, Brenco has not defaulted on the payment of any receivable. However, we currently run the risk
of default by Brenco, our main customer, due to the fact that its controlling shareholder, Odebrecht S.A., is being investigated
for corruption in the operation called “Lava Jato” (Car Wash) and the fact that Brenco filed for reorganization bankruptcy
in Brazil (recuperação judicial) in May 2019. Odebrecht’s former CEO has been arrested and the company
has been facing the following issues: difficulties to access the credit market, decrease in its business activities, acceleration
of debts, among others. Please see “Item 4—Information on the Company—Business Overview—Agricultural Activities
and Products—Sugarcane” for a table presenting the aging of receivables from Brenco. Brenco’s controlling shareholder
has been cutting costs, which can adversely affect Brenco, its business and its ability to meet its payments due to us. In addition,
in May 2019, Brenco filed for reorganization bankruptcy in Brazil (recuperação judicial). As of the date hereof,
we are unable to determine the impact, if any, that the reorganization bankruptcy of Brenco in Brazil may have on the payment of
receivables due to us or on the general risk of default by Brenco on its obligations. As of June 30, 2020 and as of the date of
this annual report, receivables from Brenco amounted to R$12.0 million and R$10.7 million, respectively.
We are dependent on third-party service
providers and subject to recent changes in the Brazilian labor legal framework.
In addition to our
own personnel, we are highly dependent on third-party contractors to develop and cultivate our agricultural properties, and to
provide the machinery and equipment needed for such purposes. As a result, our future success depends on the skill, experience,
knowledge and efforts of our third-party service providers. We cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to hire the desired
third-party service providers for our agricultural properties or that such providers will have the ability to ensure quality agricultural
production in an efficient manner, and at competitive prices. Our failure to hire the desired service providers for our agricultural
properties, or their failure to provide quality services, or the revocation or termination or our failure to renew our service
contracts or negotiate new contracts with other service providers at comparable prices and terms would adversely affect us.
Our dependence on third-party
contractors also subjects us to the risk of labor claims alleging that an employment relationship exists between us and our contractors’
personnel, and that, as a result, we are secondarily liable for our contractors’ labor and social security payment obligations,
lease payments or other obligations.
Moreover, pursuant
to Brazilian environmental law, we are jointly and severally liable, together with our contractors, for all environmental damage
caused by our third-party contractors, irrespective of our fault. Such obligations or our costs for defending against any such
claims may be significant and could have a material adverse effect on us if we were held liable.
Changes in government policies involving
biofuels may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Government policies
for encouraging biofuels as a response to environmental concerns have had, and are likely to continue to have, an impact on commodities
prices. The nature and scope of future legislation and regulations affecting our markets are unpredictable, and we cannot assure
you that current concessions, prices or market protections involving biofuels will be maintained in their current form for any
period of time. Any change in the support afforded to biofuels by the United States government or any other government may result
in stagnation or decline in the market prices of certain agricultural commodities and consequently the price of our agricultural
properties, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to extensive environmental
regulation.
Our business activities
in Brazil are subject to extensive federal, state and municipal laws and regulations concerning environmental protection, which
impose on us various environmental obligations, such as environmental licensing requirements, minimum standards for the release
of effluents, use of agrochemicals, management of solid waste, protection of certain areas (legal reserve and permanent preservation
areas), and the need for a special authorization to use water, among others. The failure to comply with such laws and regulations
may subject the violator to administrative fines, mandatory interruption of activities and criminal sanctions, in addition to the
obligation to rectify damages and pay environmental and third-party damage compensation, without any caps. In addition, Brazilian
environmental law adopts a joint and several and strict liability system for environmental damages, which makes the polluter liable
even in cases where it is not negligent and would render us jointly and severally liable for the obligations of our contractors
or off-takers. If we become subject to environmental liabilities, any costs we may incur to rectify possible environmental damage
would lead to a reduction in our financial resources, which would otherwise remain at our disposal for current or future strategic
investment, thus causing an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
As environmental laws
and their enforcement become increasingly stricter, our expenses for complying with environmental requirements are likely to increase
in the future. Furthermore, the possible implementation of new regulations, changes in existing regulations or the adoption of
other measures could cause the amount and frequency of our expenditures on environmental preservation to vary significantly compared
to present estimates or historical costs. Any unplanned future expenses could force us to reduce or forego strategic investments
and as a result could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we fail to innovate and utilize
modern agricultural technologies and techniques to enhance production and yields of our acquired agricultural properties, we may
be adversely affected.
Our business model
is focused on our acquiring underdeveloped or underutilized agricultural properties and improving them by applying evolving agricultural
technologies and techniques. Therefore, our strategy depends to a large extent on our ability to obtain and apply modern agricultural
techniques and technologies to enhance the value of the properties we acquire. If we are unable to apply in a timely manner the
most advanced technologies and farming techniques required to add value to our agricultural properties and make our products competitive
and attractive to local and international investors, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be adversely
affected.
We may experience difficulties implementing
our investment projects, which may affect our growth prospects.
Part of our strategy
with regard to our agricultural properties consists of investing in support infrastructure in order to increase the value of such
agricultural properties. In implementing our investment projects, we may face a number of challenges, including: (i) failures or
delays in acquiring necessary equipment or services; (ii) higher costs than those originally estimated; (iii) difficulties securing
the necessary environmental and government licenses; (iv) changes in market conditions, which could render the projects less profitable
than originally estimated; (v) impossibility or delays in acquiring land at attractive prices, or an increase in the land prices
on account of growing demand for land by our competitors; (vi) impossibility of, and delay in identifying and acquiring land that
is in compliance with Brazilian real estate property laws; (vii) lack of capacity to develop infrastructure and attract qualified
labor on a timely and efficient basis; (viii) disputes and litigation relating to the land we acquire; (ix) cultural challenges
deriving from the integration of new management and employees in our organization; and (x) the need to update accounting systems,
administrative data and human resources. Our inability to manage these risks would adversely affect us.
Property values in Brazil could decline
significantly.
Real estate property
values in Brazil are influenced by a wide variety of factors beyond our control, and therefore we cannot assure you that property
values will continue to increase or that property values will not decline. A significant decline in property values in Brazil could
adversely affect the value of our property holdings.
Our growth depends on our ability
to attract and retain qualified personnel.
We are highly dependent
on the services of our technical and administrative staff. If we lose any of our senior management, or require additional management
personnel, we will have to attract similarly qualified administrative and technical personnel. There is significant demand for
high-level, technical personnel with the skills and know-how required to operate our business, and we compete for this talent in
the global market. The availability of attractive opportunities in Brazil and other countries may adversely affect our ability
to hire or retain highly-qualified personnel. If we fail to attract and retain the professionals we need to expand and manage our
operations, our business may be materially and adversely affected.
Adverse weather conditions may have
an adverse impact on our agricultural properties and products and, to a lesser extent, our cattle production.
The occurrence of severe
weather conditions, including droughts, floods, heavy rainfall, hail, frost or extremely high temperatures is unpredictable and
has had and could have in the future a potentially devastating impact on our agricultural properties or production and, to a lesser
extent, our cattle production. Adverse weather conditions may be exacerbated by the effects of climate change. In recent years,
different regions in Brazil have been affected by extreme weather conditions, and the regions where our properties are located
have also experienced high temperatures and severe drought in recent years. The effect of severe weather conditions may materially
reduce the productivity of our farms, impairing our revenue and cash flow, and requiring higher levels of investment or significant
increases in our operating costs, any of which could have a material and adverse impact on us.
Diseases may affect our crops and
cattle, potentially destroying all or part of our production.
The occurrence and
effect of diseases can be unpredictable and devastating on crops, potentially rendering useless all or a significant portion of
the affected crops. The cost of preventing and treating crop disease tends to be high. For example, diseases, such as Asian soybean
rust (Phakopsora pachyrhizi) and pests, like corn earworm (Helicoverpa zea) and cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera),
can spread and may result in lower crop yields and higher operating costs. Currently, Asian soybean rust, corn earworm and cotton
bollworm can only be controlled, not eliminated.
Diseases affecting
our cattle herds, such as tuberculosis, brucellosis and foot-and-mouth disease, can render cows unable to produce meat for human
consumption. Outbreaks of cattle diseases may also result in the closure of certain important markets for our cattle products,
such as the United States. Although we abide by national veterinary health guidelines, which include laboratory analyses and vaccination,
to control diseases among the herds, especially foot-and-mouth disease, we cannot assure that future outbreaks of cattle diseases
will not occur. A future outbreak of diseases among our cattle herds may adversely affect our cattle sales which could adversely
affect our financial condition and results of operation.
The origination and
spread of diseases may occur for many reasons beyond our control, including the failure of other producers to comply with applicable
health and environmental regulations. The appearance of new diseases or the mutation or proliferation of existing diseases could
damage or completely destroy our crops and cattle herds, which would materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
Fires and other accidents may affect
our agricultural properties and adversely affect us.
Our operations are
subject to various risks affecting our agricultural properties and agricultural installations, including destruction of farms and
crops by fire and other natural disasters or events, and theft or other unexpected loss of grains or fertilizers and supplies.
We could be materially and adversely affected if any of these risks were to occur.
Widespread uncertainties and fraud
involving ownership of real estate in Brazil may adversely affect us.
Under Brazilian law,
ownership of real estate is conveyed only upon proper registration and filing of the relevant public deeds with the Real Estate
Registry Office with jurisdiction where the property is located. In certain locations in Brazil, it is frequent to come across
real estate registry errors, including duplicate or fraudulent certificates of enrollment and legal challenges. Lawsuits concerning
the lawful title of real estate are prevalent in Brazil and, as a result, there is a risk that such errors, fraud or challenges
adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, thereby causing the loss of all or substantially
all of our agricultural properties.
We depend on international trade
and economic and other conditions in our key export markets.
Brazil’s current
agricultural production capacity is greater than the demands of its domestic agricultural market. Agriculture exports account for
an increasingly significant portion of our revenue, especially as our rehabilitated farm properties gain crop production capabilities
and increased yield. Therefore, our results of operations increasingly depend on political, economic and regulatory conditions
in our principal export markets. The ability of our products to effectively compete in these export markets may be adversely affected
by a number of factors beyond our control, including the deterioration of macroeconomic conditions, the volatility of exchange
rates, the imposition of tariffs or other trade barriers or other factors in those markets such as regulations relating to the
chemical content of agricultural products and safety and health regulations.
Due to the growing
market share of Brazilian agricultural and beef products in the international markets, Brazilian exporters are increasingly being
affected by tariffs and other barriers imposed by importing countries, in order to, among other things, protect local producers
by limiting access of Brazilian companies to their markets. For example, the European Union imposes protective tariffs designed
to mitigate the effects of Brazil’s lower production costs on local European producers. Developed countries also use direct
and indirect subsidies to enhance the competitiveness of their producers in other markets.
Additionally, due to
the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, governments and other authorities have established certain restrictions on the freedom of movement
of individuals and business operations, including travel bans, which led to supply chain disruptions and border closures. Other
measures, such as the restriction on imports or closures of ports, airports or any ports of entry, or border closures may have
a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. See “—We may be exposed to risks related to health
epidemics and pandemics, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.”
The adoption of measures
by a given country or region, such as restrictions, import quotas or suspension of imports could substantially affect the export
volume of agricultural products and, consequently, our results of operations.
In July 2018, the U.S.
and China began imposing tariffs on approximately $34 billion of each other’s exports. Subsequently, the U.S. imposed tariffs
on an additional $216 billion in Chinese goods, and China imposed tariffs on an additional $76 billion worth of U.S goods. Negotiations
to resolve the trade dispute are currently ongoing. Continued global trade tensions may lead to the imposition of further tariffs
or other future geopolitical economic developments. Future actions of the U.S. administration or other countries, including China,
with respect to tariffs or international trade agreements and policies remain currently unclear. We are unable at this time to
predict the outcome of the trade tensions between the United States and China. The escalation of such trade tensions between the
United States and China, and the imposition of tariffs, retaliatory tariffs or other trade restrictions may result in a rebalancing
of global export flows in our key export markets and an increase in global competition, which in turn could adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
If the competitiveness
of our products in one or more of our significant markets were to be affected by any one of these events, we may not be able to
reallocate our products to other markets on comparable terms, which could therefore adversely affect our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
A worldwide economic downturn could
weaken demand for our products and lead to lower prices.
Demand for our products
may be affected by international, national and local economic conditions that are beyond our control. Adverse changes in the perceived
or actual economic conditions, such as higher fuel prices, higher interest rates, stock and real estate market declines and associated
volatility, more restrictive credit markets, higher taxes, and changes in governmental policies could reduce the level of demand
for, or the prices of, our products. We cannot predict the duration or magnitude of a downturn or the timing or strength of economic
recovery following the adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. If a downturn were to continue for an extended period of time
or worsen, we could experience a prolonged period of decreased demand and prices. In addition, economic downturns may adversely
impact our suppliers, which can result in disruptions to our operations and financial losses. Moreover, the deterioration of global
economic conditions, particularly in relevant economies, such as the United States, China and Europe, as a result of the COVID-19
pandemic, may ultimately decrease the demand for our products and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and
results of operations. See “—We may be exposed to risks related to health epidemics and pandemics, such as the COVID-19
pandemic, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.”
Fluctuations in the value of the
Brazilian real in relation to the U.S. dollar could adversely affect us.
Foreign exchange fluctuations,
particularly of the Brazilian real against the U.S. dollar, may significantly affect our results of operations given that:
(1) our products and the basic supplies used in our production are traded internationally; (2) soybean prices are defined based
on prices prevalent on the Chicago Board of Trade, or CBOT; and (3) most markets are served by several suppliers from different
countries, and competitiveness of farm products abroad may increase in relation to ours in light of the appreciation of the Brazilian
currency in relation to the U.S. dollar. Fluctuations in the value of the real in relation to the U.S. dollar could impact
our export revenue, our sales in U.S. dollars in the Brazilian market and our financial expenses and operating costs, which may
adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The real has
suffered frequent depreciations and appreciations in relation to the U.S. dollar and other foreign currencies during the past decade.
The Brazilian government has in the past utilized different exchange rate regimes, including sudden devaluations, periodic mini
devaluations (during which the frequency of adjustments has ranged from daily to monthly), exchange controls, dual exchange rate
markets and a floating exchange rate system. Since 1999, Brazil has adopted a floating exchange rate system with interventions
by the Central Bank in buying or selling foreign currency. From time to time, there have been significant fluctuations in the exchange
rate between the Brazilian real and the U.S. dollar and other currencies. The devaluations in more recent periods resulted
in significant fluctuations in the exchange rates of the real against the U.S. dollar and other currencies.
In 2017, the real
depreciated by 1.5% against the U.S. dollar, and the real/U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$3.3080 on December 31, 2017. In
2018, the real depreciated by 17.1% against the U.S. dollar, and on December 31, 2018, the real/U.S. dollar exchange
rate was R$3.8748. In 2019, the real depreciated by 0.6% against the U.S. dollar, and on December 31, 2019, the real/U.S.
dollar exchange rate was R$4.0307. On September 30, 2020, the real/U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$5.6407 per US$1.00. There
can be no assurance that the real will not depreciate or appreciate against the U.S. dollar in the future.
We also hold derivative
financial instruments to hedge risks relating to revenue from exports and operating costs denominated in foreign currencies. If
we fail to manage these instruments properly, we may be adversely affected by our exposure to these risks, which may have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our business is seasonal, and our
revenue may fluctuate significantly depending on the growing cycle of our crops.
Agribusiness operations
are predominantly seasonal in nature. In Brazil, the harvest of soybean and corn generally occurs from February to June. The annual
sugarcane harvest period in Brazil normally begins in April and ends in November of each year. Therefore, our results of operations
are likely to continue to significantly fluctuate between the planting and harvest periods of each crop, which cause fluctuations
in our cash flows as a result of disparities between our revenue stream and our fixed expenses. In addition, seasonality creates
limited windows of opportunity for our producers to complete required tasks at each stage of crop cultivation. Should events such
as adverse weather conditions (including deluges of rain as has recently been the case throughout Brazil) or transportation interruptions
occur during these seasonal windows, we may face reduced revenue without an opportunity to recover until the following crop’s
planting. Finally, because of the effects of seasonality, our quarterly results may not be indicative of our annual results.
Our growth plan will require additional
capital, which may not be available on terms and conditions acceptable to us, or at all.
Our operations require
a significant amount of capital. We may need to seek additional capital by issuing shares or debt instruments, or by incurring
indebtedness. Our ability to raise capital will depend on our future profitability, which is currently uncertain, and on political
and economic conditions in Brazil and the international agricultural and real estate markets. Depending on these and other factors,
many of which are beyond our control, additional capital may not be available at all or on conditions that are favorable or acceptable
to us. If we are required to finance our activities through indebtedness, it is likely that the terms of that debt will impose
upon us obligations or covenants, financial or otherwise, that could restrict our operational flexibility. Should we fail to raise
additional capital under conditions that are acceptable to us, our business, financial condition and results of operations could
be adversely affected.
We plan to continue to use financial
derivative instruments, which may result in substantial losses.
We plan to continue
to use derivative financial instruments, mainly commodity hedge derivatives, foreign exchange derivatives and exchange rate swaps.
If we enter into such hedging agreements and future prices of the underlying commodities differ from our expectations, we may incur
substantial losses which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Furthermore, our hedging
strategies may not properly take account of the effects of foreign exchange or commodity variations on our financial position.
On entering into forward exchange and commodity agreements, we will be subject to the risk that our counterparties could fail to
meet the conditions of such agreements. We may not be able to receive compensation for losses and damages from any defaulting counterparty
through legal remedies, on account of laws protecting against bankruptcy or other similar protections for insolvent debtors, foreign
laws restricting cross-border legal remedies, or for other reasons, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
We may not be successful in our future
partnerships and strategic relationships.
We have entered into
strategic partnerships and alliances in order to benefit from certain business opportunities. We cannot predict if such strategic
partnerships and alliances will be successful or if more partnerships and alliances will take place. Our ability to successfully
expand our business by means of strategic partnerships and alliances depends on various factors, including our ability to negotiate
favorable conditions for such partnerships and alliances, in addition to factors beyond our control, such as our partners’
compliance with obligations arising from the partnership. Furthermore, our expectations regarding the benefits of these partnerships
may not materialize. If we are unable to develop successful strategic partnerships and alliances, we could also be adversely affected.
Cresud, our controlling shareholder,
and certain members of our board of directors may have interests that differ from those of our other shareholders.
As of September 30,
2020, Cresud held 32.06% of our common shares. Cresud has other numerous investments and may have other priorities that may conflict
with those of our other shareholders, and as a result thereof, significant conflicts of interest may arise between Cresud and our
other shareholders. In addition, five of our nine directors have been nominated by Cresud and certain members of our management,
including our Chief Administrative Officer and Investor Relation Officer, were previously employed by Cresud. This situation may
give rise to actual or apparent conflicts of interest as such directors and officers may have fiduciary duties or other interests
owed to both us and Cresud or any of its affiliates. It may also limit the ability of such directors and officers to participate
in certain matters.
In addition, as a result
of Cresud’s ownership interest in us, conflicts of interest could arise with respect to transactions involving our ongoing
business activities, and the resolution of these conflicts may not be favorable to us. Specifically, business opportunities, including
but not limited to potential targets for rural property acquisitions, may be attractive to both Cresud and us. We may not be able
to resolve any potential conflicts and, even if we do so, the resolution may be less favorable to us than if we were dealing with
an unaffiliated party.
Increases in the price of raw materials
and oil may adversely affect us.
Our agricultural properties
are located in Brazil’s savannah region, a location where the soil is mostly acidic and not very fertile, requiring the use
of lime and fertilizers. Our operations require other raw materials such as pesticides and seeds which we acquire from local and
international suppliers. We do not have long-term supply contracts for these raw materials and therefore are exposed to the risk
of cost increases. A significant increase in the price of lime, fertilizers or other raw materials we use would likely reduce our
profitability or otherwise adversely affect our business operations as these are not costs that can readily be passed on to our
customers. In addition, certain of our production costs, including fertilizers and the cost of leasing agricultural machinery,
are linked to the international price of oil and its derivatives. Therefore, if the price of oil increases significantly, our results
of operations could be adversely affected.
Delays or failures in the delivery
of raw materials used by us and our suppliers could have an adverse effect on us.
We depend on suppliers
to provide us with fertilizers, seeds, other raw materials and machinery services. Possible delays in the delivery of such items
may delay our planting efforts until we are able to establish agreements with other suppliers, or may delay our harvest in case
of delay in delivery of machinery. Accordingly, any delays, failures or defects in the delivery of raw materials or inputs or with
regard to the provision of services to us by our suppliers could adversely affect our business and results of operations. See “—Lack
of transportation, storage and processing infrastructure in Brazil represents an important challenge for the Brazilian agricultural
and agricultural real estate sectors.”
Certain of our agricultural products
contain genetically modified organisms (GMOs), and risks associated with GMOs remain uncertain.
The totality of our
products, including soybean and corn, contain genetically modified organisms, or GMOs in varying proportions depending on the crop
year. Production and consumption of GMOs remain controversial, and adverse publicity and consumer resistance have led to the adoption
of certain governmental regulations limiting sales of GMO products in important markets including the European Union. If GMOs were
determined to present risks to human health or to the environment, demand for our GMO products could collapse, and we could face
potentially significant liability for harm caused by such products, all of which could materially and adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
In 2018, a Brazilian
trial court ruled that new products containing “glyphosate” – a herbicide widely used in soybeans and others
crops – were prohibited from being registered in Brazil, and existing registrations would be suspended until the government
reevaluates their toxicity. This decision also suspended the registration of others chemicals, such as the insecticide abamectin
and the fungicide thiram. According to the Brazilian Agriculture Minister, this decision would be a disaster for the agricultural
industry and, for this reason, the decision was subject to multiple appeals. On September 3, 2018, a court of appeals reversed
the trial court’s decision. Currently, the use of glyphosate is permitted. However, we are unable to guarantee that it will
continue to be allowed.
The prohibition of
the use of glyphosate to control weed infestation could compromise no-till farming, which is important for productivity and sustainability,
and lead to increased use of other products for pest control. Currently, there is no alternative in Brazil to replace glyphosate.
Similar products have a high cost and are not readily available to meet the demand for glyphosate. As a result, our production
costs could increase, and our productivity could be significantly impacted, which could result in lower production margins.
Lack of transportation, storage and
processing infrastructure in Brazil represents an important challenge for the Brazilian agricultural and agricultural real estate
sectors.
We depend on efficient
access to transportation and port infrastructure for the growth of Brazilian agriculture and our operations. We may decide to acquire
agricultural properties in areas where existing transportation infrastructure is inadequate and where improvements may be required
to make our agricultural production more accessible to export centers at competitive prices. A substantial portion of Brazilian
agricultural production is currently transported by trucks, which is significantly more expensive than transportation by rail cars.
Given that our dependence on road transportation prevents us from being considered a low-cost producer, our ability to compete
on the world market may be impaired, especially as the price of fuel increases. As a result, we may not be able to secure efficient
transportation for our production to reach major markets in a cost-efficient manner or at all, which may adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, as recently
as May 2018, Brazil faced a widespread truck drivers’ strike, which caused a nationwide transportation paralysis, highway
blockades, cargo delays, shortages of food, supplies and fuel in Brazil. If a widespread strike or similar disruptive event happens
again, it could adversely affect the logistics sector as whole and our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Disruptions may also
be caused by the spread of infectious disease, such as COVID-19, or by a deterioration in labor or union relations, disputes or
work stoppages or other labor-related developments affecting us and our suppliers and distributors. See “—We may be
exposed to risks related to health epidemics and pandemics, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, which could adversely affect our business
and results of operations.”
Competition in the markets for our
products may affect us.
We face significant
domestic and international competition in each of our markets and in many of our production lines. The global market for agricultural
products is highly competitive and sensitive to changes in industrial capacity, product inventories and cyclical changes in the
world economy, any one or more of which may affect to a significant degree the selling price of our products and therefore our
profitability. Since many of our products are agricultural commodities, such products compete in international markets almost exclusively
based on price. Many other producers of such commodities are larger than us and have more significant financial and other resources.
Furthermore, many other producers receive subsidies in their respective countries that generally are not available in Brazil. Such
subsidies may afford producers lower production costs or enable them to operate in an environment with sharp price reductions,
constrained margins and operating losses for longer periods. Any increased competitive pressure with respect to our products could
materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Social movements may affect the use
of our agricultural properties or cause damage to them.
Social movements such
as the Landless Rural Workers’ Movement (Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem Terra) and the Pastoral Land Commission
(Comissão Pastoral da Terra) are active in Brazil and advocate land reform and property redistribution by the Brazilian
government.
Invasion and occupation
of agricultural land by large numbers of people is a common practice among the members of such movements and, in certain regions,
including those where we currently invest, remedies such as police protection or eviction procedures are inadequate or non-existent.
As a result, we cannot assure you that our agricultural properties will not be subject to invasion or occupation by any social
movement. Any invasion or occupation may materially impair the use of our lands and adversely affect our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
We made investments in farmland in
Paraguay, and we may possibly make investments in other countries in and outside Latin America, in which case we would be subject
to the associated economic, legal, political and regulatory risks.
Currently, we conduct
our activities in Brazil and Paraguay. We are considering expanding into other countries in and outside Latin America, but currently
have no definitive commitments or specific plans with respect thereto. In the future, we may expand our activities into other countries
in Latin America or elsewhere if we decide that international expansion would be appropriate to achieve our objectives. The success
in other countries of our business strategy and business model that we apply in Brazil would be subject to a high level of uncertainty
and depend on numerous factors beyond our control. Therefore, we cannot assure you that any such expansion would be profitable
or enable us to obtain the expected returns on our investments, or even recover our investments. Any international expansion of
our activities would be subject to political, economic and regulatory risks in the relevant country and to risks inherent to the
management of a transnational company, including:
|
●
|
challenges posed by distance, language, local business practices and cultural differences (i.e. lack of financing; longer payment cycles in the relevant country; difficulties in forming partnerships or strategic alliances with local parties; conflicting or redundant practices in respect to tax, regulatory, legal and administrative aspects);
|
|
●
|
negative effects of currency fluctuations or the imposition of exchange controls or restrictions on repatriation of capital;
|
|
●
|
adverse changes in laws and local policies, particularly those relating to import tariffs, labor practices, environment, investment, acquisition of agricultural property by foreign companies or companies controlled by foreigners;
|
|
●
|
difficulty of enforcement of contracts and collection or enforcement of debts, or difficulties or restrictions imposed by local courts;
|
|
●
|
expropriation and imposition of legal or administrative limitations to the exercise of property rights as a result of changes in laws or applicable regulations;
|
|
●
|
difficulty in obtaining licenses, permits or other approvals from local government authorities;
|
|
●
|
political disputes, social unrest and deteriorating local economic conditions;
|
|
●
|
transnational conflicts or disputes involving Brazil and the relevant country; and
|
|
●
|
terrorism or military conflicts; and natural disasters, epidemics, riots and insurrections.
|
Our inability to recognize
and respond to these differences, challenges and risks could adversely affect any operations we may undertake in markets outside
of Brazil, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Unauthorized disclosure, or loss
of intellectual property or other sensitive business or personal information, or disruption in information technology by cyber-attacks,
as well as our failure to comply with existing and future laws and regulations relating to data privacy and data security can subject
us to penalties or liability and can adversely impact our operations, reputation and financial results.
We collect, store,
process and use certain confidential information and other user data in connection with our business operations. We must ensure
that any processing, collection, use, storage, dissemination, transfer and disposal of data for which we are responsible complies
with relevant data protection and privacy laws. We rely on commercially available systems, software, tools and monitoring to provide
secure processing, transmission and storage of confidential information, such as customer, employee, company and other personal
information.
Data protection and
privacy laws are developing to take into account the changes in cultural and consumer attitudes towards the protection of personal
data. For example, on August 14, 2018, Brazil enacted Law No. 13,709/2018 (Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados,
or the LGPD), a comprehensive data protection law establishing general principles and obligations that apply across multiple economic
sectors and contractual relationships. The LGPD establishes detailed rules for the collection, use, processing and storage of personal
data and will affect all economic sectors, including the relationship between customers and suppliers of goods and services, employers
and employees, and other relationships in which personal data is collected, whether in a digital or physical manner. The LGPD entered
into force on September 18, 2020, but the imposition of penalties pursuant to it remains suspended until August 2021.
As we seek to expand
our business and operations, we expect that we will be increasingly subject to laws and regulations relating to the collection,
use, retention, security, and transfer of information, including the personally identifiable information of our employees and customers.
These laws and regulations may be interpreted and applied differently over time and from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and it is
possible that they will be interpreted and applied in ways that will materially and adversely affect our business. If there are
breaches of the LGPD obligations, or of other data privacy laws and regulations, as the case may be, we could face significant
administrative and monetary sanctions as well as reputational damage, which could have a material adverse effect on our operations,
financial condition and prospects.
In addition, despite
the security measures that we have in place, our facilities and systems, and those of our third-party service providers, may be
vulnerable to security breaches, cyber-attacks, acts of vandalism, computer viruses, misplaced or lost data, programming or human
errors, or other similar events.
See also “—We
were the target of a cybersecurity incident that disrupted our systems”.
We were the target of a cybersecurity
incident that disrupted our systems.
In October 2019, we
experienced a cybersecurity incident, in which certain of our network and computer systems and data became temporarily unavailable.
We have no reason to believe that such incident resulted in the unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. Any security
incident, or any perceived failure involving the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure of confidential information,
as well as any failure or perceived failure to comply with laws, policies, legal obligations or industry standards regarding data
privacy and protection, whether by us or our service providers, could damage our reputation, expose us to litigation risk and liability,
subject us to negative publicity, disrupt our operations and harm our business. We cannot assure you that our security measures,
or those put in place by our service providers, will be sufficient to prevent future security breaches or incidents, which may
directly or indirectly affect us, or that our failure to prevent them will not have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations or financial condition.
Cyber-attacks or security
breaches could compromise confidential, business and other critical information, cause a disruption in our operations or harm our
reputation, as certain of our operations are dependent on information technology and telecommunication systems and services. Information
assets, including intellectual property, personal data and other business-sensitive critical information are an attractive asset
to cyber criminals, cyberterrorism or other external agents. A significant cyber-attack, a human error, including from our employees
and partners, or obsolescence of technology could result in the loss of critical business information and adversely affect our
operations and results of operations.
We continuously monitor
and develop our information technology networks and infrastructure. We also conduct annual tests to prevent, detect, address and
mitigate the risk of unauthorized access, misuse, computer viruses and other events that could have a material impact on us. However,
we cannot assure you that these measures will be effective in protecting us against future cyberattacks and other related breaches
of our information technology systems.
Our risk and exposure
to these matters cannot be fully mitigated because of, among other things, the evolving nature of these threats. As cyber threats
continue to evolve, we may be required to expend additional resources to continue to modify or enhance protective measures or to
investigate and remediate any security vulnerabilities that are discovered in the future. In addition, cyber-attacks could result
in important remediation costs, increased cyber security costs, lost revenues due to disruption of activities, litigation and reputational
harm affecting customer and investor confidence, which ultimately could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
Risks Relating to Brazil
The measures taken or to be implemented
by the Brazilian government in response to the COVID-19 pandemic may have an adverse effect on our business and operations.
In March 2020, the
World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic. Brazilian federal, state and municipal governments and other
authorities have adopted a number of measures to adress the potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, including:
|
●
|
to contain or delay the spread of COVID-19, the Brazilian Ministry
of Health (Ministério da Saúde), as well as several state and municipal authorities have adopted or recommended
social distancing measures;
|
|
●
|
in March 2020, the Brazilian federal government created a Crisis Committee
to Monitor the Impacts of COVID-19 in Brazil. Since then, it has announced several measures to adress the effects of the COVID-19
pandemic in Brazil
|
|
●
|
the Brazilian National Congress has held discussions regarding several
measures to increase the Brazilian government’s revenues, such as imposing new taxes, revoking tax benefits and increasing
the rates of current taxes; and
|
|
●
|
a revision of tax benefits and increase of the rates of current taxes;
|
It is also possible
that our commercial agreements, including rural partnership agreements, could be affected by the adverse impacts derived from the
COVID-19 pandemic, since the parties thereto may be unable to comply with their contractual obligations. The COVID-19 pandemic
would most likely be considered as an act of God or force majeure event by Brazilian courts. If our agreements are litigated, parties
thereto could try to justify nonperformance and request: (i) termination without penalties; (ii) adjustment or release from contractual
obligations; (iii) adjustment or release from the effects of arrears; and (iv) adjustment or release from penalties for breach
of contract, which, could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.
In addition, there
is considerable uncertainty regarding the possible outcomes of the COVID-19 pandemic. We cannot predict what other measures will
be implemented to mitigate the impacts of COVID-19 and whether they will lead to restrictions or limitations that could affect
our business operations. The deterioration of global economic conditions as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic may decrease demand
for our products and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The COVID-19
pandemic may also heighten several of the other risk factors described in this annual report.
The Brazilian government has exercised,
and continues to exercise, significant influence over the Brazilian economy, which, together with Brazilian political and economic
conditions, may adversely affect us.
We may be adversely
affected by the following factors, as well as the Brazilian federal government’s response to these factors:
|
●
|
economic and social instability;
|
|
●
|
increase in interest rates;
|
|
●
|
exchange controls and restrictions on remittances abroad;
|
|
●
|
restrictions and taxes on agricultural exports;
|
|
●
|
exchange rate fluctuations;
|
|
●
|
volatility and liquidity in domestic capital and credit markets;
|
|
●
|
expansion or contraction of the Brazilian economy, as measured by GDP growth rates;
|
|
●
|
allegations of corruption against political parties, elected officials or other public officials, including allegations made in relation to the Lava Jato investigation;
|
|
●
|
government measures aimed at controlling the COVID-19 pandemic;
|
|
●
|
government policies related to our sector; and
|
|
●
|
fiscal or monetary policy and amendments to tax legislation; and other political, diplomatic, social or economic developments in or affecting Brazil.
|
Historically, the Brazilian
government has frequently intervened in the Brazilian economy and has occasionally made significant changes in economic policies
and regulations, including, among others, the enactment of new tax laws, changes in monetary, fiscal and tax policies, currency
devaluations, capital controls and limits on imports.
The Brazilian economy
has been experiencing a slowdown. The Brazilian GDP decreased 3.6% in 2016, increased 1.0% in 2017, increased 1.1% in 2018, increased
1.1% in 2019 and decreased 5.9% in the first six months of 2020.
Inflation, unemployment
and interest rates have increased more recently, and the Brazilian real has weakened significantly in relation to the U.S.
dollar. The market expectations for 2020 are that the Brazilian economy will experience a severe slowdown and Brazilian GDP will
decrease, as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Adverse economic conditions in Brazil may materially and adversely affect
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
As a result of investigations
carried out in connection with the Lava Jato (Car Wash) operation into corruption in Brazil, a number of senior politicians,
including congressmen, and executive officers of certain of the major state-owned companies in Brazil have resigned or been arrested,
while others are being investigated for allegations of unethical and illegal conduct. The matters that have come, and may continue
to come, to light as a result of, or in connection with, the Lava Jato operation and other similar operations have adversely
affected, and we expect that they will continue to adversely affect, the Brazilian economy, markets and trading prices of securities
issued by Brazilian issuers in the near future.
The ultimate outcome
of these investigations is uncertain, but they have already had an adverse effect on the image and reputation of the implicated
companies, and on the general market perception of the Brazilian economy, the political environment and the Brazilian capital markets.
The development of these investigations has affected and may continue to adversely affect us. We cannot predict if these investigations
will bring further political or economic instability to Brazil, or if new allegations will be raised against high-level members
of the Brazilian federal government. In addition, we cannot predict the results of these investigations, nor their effects on the
Brazilian economy.
The ongoing economic uncertainty
and political instability in Brazil may adversely affect the Brazilian economy, our business, and the market price of our shares
and ADSs.
Brazil’s political
environment has historically influenced, and continues to influence, the performance of the country’s economy. Political
crises have affected and continue to affect the confidence of investors and the general public, which have historically resulted
in economic deceleration and heightened volatility in the securities issued by Brazilian companies.
In recent years, there
has been significant political turmoil in connection with the impeachment of the former president (who was removed from office
in August 2016) and ongoing investigations of her successor (who left office in January 2019) as part of the ongoing “Lava
Jato” investigations. Presidential elections were held in Brazil in October 2018. We cannot predict which policies the new
President of Brazil, who assumed office on January 1, 2019, may adopt or change during his mandate or the effect that any such
policies might have on our business and on the Brazilian economy. Any such new policies or changes to current policies may have
a material adverse effect on us. The political uncertainty resulting from the presidential elections and the transition to a new
government may have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and the price of our shares
and ADSs.
Furthermore, Brazil’s
federal budget has been in deficit since 2014. Similarly, the governments of Brazil’s constituent states are also facing
fiscal concerns due to their high debt burdens, declining revenues and inflexible expenditures. While the Brazilian Congress has
approved a ceiling on government spending that will limit primary public expenditure growth to the prior year’s inflation
for a period of at least 10 years, local and foreign investors believe that fiscal reforms, and in particular a reform of Brazil’s
pension system, will be critical for Brazil to comply with the spending limit. As of the date of this annual report, discussions
in the Brazilian Congress relating to such reforms remain ongoing. Diminished confidence in the Brazilian government’s budgetary
condition and fiscal stance could result in downgrades of Brazil’s sovereign debt by credit rating agencies, negatively impact
Brazil’s economy, lead to further depreciation of the real and an increase in inflation and interest rates, thus adversely
affecting our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Uncertainty about the
Brazilian government’s implementation of changes in policies or regulations that affect such implementation may contribute
to economic instability in Brazil and increase the volatility of securities issued abroad by Brazilian companies, including our
securities. Any of the above factors may create additional political uncertainty, adversely affect the Brazilian economy, our business,
financial condition, results of operations and the market price of our shares and ADSs.
Inflation, coupled with the Brazilian
government’s measures to fight inflation, may hinder Brazilian economic growth and increase interest rates, which could have
a material adverse effect on us.
Brazil has in the past
experienced significantly high rates of inflation. As a result, the Brazilian government adopted monetary policies that resulted
in Brazilian interest rates being among the highest in the world. The Central Bank’s Monetary Policy Committee (Comitê
de Política Monetária do Banco Central, or COPOM), establishes an official interest rate target for the Brazilian
financial system based on the level of economic growth, inflation rate and other economic indicators in Brazil. Between 2004 and
2010, the official Brazilian interest rate varied from 19.75% to 8.75% per year. In response to an increase in inflation in 2010,
the Brazilian government increased the official Brazilian interest rate, the SELIC rate, which was 10.75% per year as or December
31, 2010. The SELIC rate has increased and decreased since then and, as of June 30, 2019, it was 6.50% per year. The inflation
rates, as measured by the General Market Price Index (Índice Geral de Preços–Mercado), or IGP-M, and
calculated by Fundação Getúlio Vargas, or FGV, were 7.18% in 2016, (0.52)% in 2017, 7.54% in 2018 and
7.30% in 2019. Cumulative inflation in the first six months of 2020, calculated by the same index, was 4.39%.
Inflation and the government
measures to fight inflation have had and may continue to have significant effects on the Brazilian economy and our business. In
addition, the Brazilian government’s measures to control inflation have often included maintaining a tight monetary policy
with high interest rates, thereby restricting the availability of credit and slowing economic growth. On the other hand, an easing
of monetary policies of the Brazilian government may trigger increases in inflation. In the event of an increase in inflation,
we may not be able to adjust our daily rates to offset the effects of inflation on our cost structure, which may materially and
adversely affect us.
An increase in interest
rates may have a significant adverse effect on us. In addition, as of June 30, 2020, certain of our loans were subject to interest
rate fluctuations, such as the Brazilian long-term interest rate (Taxa de Juros de Longo Prazo, or TJLP), and the interbank
deposit rate (Certificados de Depósitos Interbancários), or CDI. In the event of an abrupt increase in interest
rates, our ability to comply with our financial obligations may be materially and adversely affected.
A deterioration in general economic
and market conditions or the perception of risk in other countries, principally in emerging countries or the United States, may
have a negative impact on the Brazilian economy and us.
Economic and market
conditions in other countries, including United States and Latin American and other emerging market countries, may affect the Brazilian
economy and the market for securities issued by Brazilian companies. Although economic conditions in these countries may differ
significantly from those in Brazil, investors’ reactions to developments in these other countries may have an adverse effect
on the market value of securities of Brazilian issuers. Crises in other emerging market countries could dampen investor enthusiasm
for securities of Brazilian issuers, including ours, which could adversely affect the market price of our common shares. In the
past, the adverse development of economic conditions in emerging markets resulted in a significant flow of funds out of the country
and a decrease in the quantity of foreign capital invested in Brazil. Changes in the prices of securities of public companies,
lack of available credit, reductions in spending, general slowdown of the global economy, exchange rate instability and inflationary
pressure may adversely affect, directly or indirectly, the Brazilian economy and securities market. Global economic downturns and
related instability in the international financial system have had, and may continue to have, a negative effect on economic growth
in Brazil. Global economic downturns reduce the availability of liquidity and credit to fund the continuation and expansion of
business operations worldwide.
In addition, the Brazilian
economy is affected by international economic and market conditions generally, especially economic conditions in the United States.
Share prices on B3 S.A. – Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão, or B3, for example, have historically been sensitive to fluctuations
in U.S. interest rates and the behavior of the major U.S. stock indexes. An increase in interest rates in other countries, especially
the United States, may reduce global liquidity and investors’ interest in the Brazilian capital markets, adversely affecting
the price of our common shares.
Risks Relating to our American Depositary
Shares and Common Shares
A holder of our American Depositary
Shares may face disadvantages compared to a holder of our common shares when attempting to exercise voting rights.
Holders of our American
Depositary Shares, or ADSs, may instruct the depositary to vote the common shares underlying the ADSs. For the depositary to follow
the voting instructions, it must receive them on or before the date specified in our voting materials. The depositary must try,
as far as practical, subject to Brazilian law and our articles of association, to vote the common shares as instructed. In most
cases, if the ADS holder does not give instructions to the depositary, it may vote the common shares in favor of proposals supported
by our board of directors, or, when practicable and permitted, give a discretionary proxy to a person designated by us. We cannot
be certain that ADS holders will receive voting materials in time to ensure that they can instruct the depositary to vote the underlying
common shares. Also, the depositary is not responsible for failing to carry out voting instructions or for the manner of carrying
out voting instructions. This means that ADS holders may not be able to exercise their right to vote and there may be nothing they
can do if their common shares or other deposited securities are not voted as requested.
Holders of our common shares or ADSs
may not receive any dividends or interest on shareholders’ equity.
According to our bylaws,
we must pay our shareholders at least 25% of our annual net income as dividends or interest on shareholders’ equity, as calculated
and adjusted under Brazilian corporate law. This adjusted net income may be capitalized, used to absorb losses or otherwise retained
as allowed under Brazilian corporate law and may not be available to be paid as dividends or interest on shareholders’ equity.
Additionally, Brazilian
corporate law allows a publicly-traded company like ours to suspend the mandatory distribution of dividends in any particular year
if our board of directors informs our shareholders that such distributions would be inadvisable in view of our financial condition
or cash availability. Holders of our common shares or ADSs may not receive any dividends or interest on shareholders’ equity
in any given year if our board of directors makes such a determination or if our operations fail to generate net income.
Holders of our common shares or ADSs
in the United States may not be entitled to the same preemptive rights as Brazilian shareholders, pursuant to Brazilian law, in
the subscription of shares resulting from capital increases made by us.
Under Brazilian law,
if we issue new shares in exchange for cash or assets as part of a capital increase, subject to certain exceptions, we must grant
our shareholders preemptive rights at the time of the subscription of shares, corresponding to their respective interest in our
share capital, allowing them to maintain their existing shareholding percentage. We may not legally be permitted to allow holders
of our common shares or ADSs in the United States to exercise any preemptive rights in any future capital increase unless (i) we
file a registration statement for an offering of shares resulting from the capital increase with the SEC, or (ii) the offering
of shares resulting from the capital increase qualifies for an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.
At the time of any future capital increase, we will evaluate the costs and potential liabilities associated with filing a registration
statement for an offering of shares with the SEC and any other factors that we consider important in determining whether to file
such a registration statement. We cannot assure the holders of our common shares or ADSs in the United States that we will file
a registration statement with the SEC to allow them to participate in any of our capital increases. As a result, the equity interest
of such holders in our company may be diluted.
If holders of our ADSs exchange them
for common shares, they may risk temporarily losing, or being limited in, the ability to remit foreign currency abroad and certain
Brazilian tax advantages.
The Brazilian custodian
for the common shares underlying our ADSs must obtain an electronic registration number with the Central Bank to allow the depositary
to remit U.S. dollars abroad. ADS holders benefit from the electronic certificate of foreign capital registration from the Central
Bank obtained by the custodian for the depositary, which permits it to convert dividends and other distributions with respect to
the common shares into U.S. dollars and remit the proceeds of such conversion abroad. If holders of our ADSs decide to exchange
them for the underlying common shares, they will only be entitled to rely on the custodian’s certificate of registration
with the Central Bank for five business days after the date of the exchange. Thereafter, they will be unable to remit U.S. dollars
abroad unless they obtain a new electronic certificate of foreign capital registration in connection with the common shares, which
may result in expenses and may cause delays in receiving distributions. See “Item 10—Additional Information—Exchange
Controls.”
Also, if holders of
our ADSs that exchange them for our common shares do not qualify under the foreign investment regulations, they will generally
be subject to less favorable tax treatment of dividends and distribution on, and the proceeds from any sale of, our common shares.
See “Item 10—Additional Information—Exchange Controls” and “Item 10—Additional Information—Taxation—Brazilian
Tax Considerations.”
Holders of our ADSs may face difficulties
in protecting their interests because, as a Brazilian company, we are subject to different corporate rules and regulations and
our shareholders may have fewer and less well-defined rights.
Holders of our ADSs
are not direct shareholders of our company and are unable to enforce the rights of shareholders under our bylaws and Brazilian
corporate law.
Our corporate affairs
are governed by our bylaws and Brazilian corporate law, which differ from the requirements that would apply if we were incorporated
in a jurisdiction in the United States, such as the State of Delaware or New York, or elsewhere outside Brazil. Even if a holder
of our ADSs surrenders its ADSs and becomes a direct shareholder, its rights as a holder of our common shares under Brazilian corporate
law to protect its interests relative to actions by our board of directors may be fewer and less well-defined than under the laws
of those other jurisdictions.
Holders of our ADSs may face difficulties
in serving process on or enforcing judgments against us and other persons.
We are organized under
the laws of Brazil, and certain of our executive officers and our independent registered public accountants reside or are based
in Brazil. Most of our assets and those of these other persons are located in Brazil. As a result, it may not be possible for holders
of our ADSs to effect service of process upon us or these other persons within the United States or other jurisdictions outside
Brazil or to enforce against us or these other persons judgments obtained in the United States or other jurisdictions outside Brazil.
In addition, because substantially all of our assets and all of our directors and officers reside outside the United States, any
judgment obtained in the United States against us or any of our directors or officers may not be collectible within the United
States. Because judgments of U.S. courts for civil liabilities based upon the U.S. federal securities laws may only be enforced
in Brazil if certain conditions are met, holders may face greater difficulties in protecting their interests in the case of actions
by us or our board of directors or executive officers than would shareholders of a U.S. corporation.
In addition, rules
and policies against self-dealing or for preserving shareholder interests may be less well-defined and enforced in Brazil than
in the United States and certain other countries, which may put holders of our common shares and ADSs at a potential disadvantage.
Corporate disclosures also may be less complete or informative than those of a public company in the United States or in certain
other countries.
Our status as a foreign private issuer
allows us to follow local corporate governance practices, which may limit the protections afforded to investors.
We are a foreign private
issuer, as defined by the SEC for purposes of the Exchange Act. As a result, for so long as we remain a foreign private issuer,
we will be exempt from most of the corporate governance requirements of stock exchanges located in the United States; accordingly,
you will not be provided with the benefits or have the same protections afforded to shareholders of U.S. public companies.
The standards applicable
to us are considerably different from the standards applied to U.S. domestic issuers. Although Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act
generally requires that a listed company have an audit committee of its board of directors composed solely of independent directors,
as a foreign private issuer, we are relying on a general exemption from this requirement that is available to us as a result of
the features of Brazilian law applicable to our fiscal council. In addition, we are not required to, among other things:
|
●
|
have a majority of independent members on our board of directors;
|
|
●
|
have a compensation committee or a nominating/corporate governance committee of our board of directors; and
|
|
●
|
have regularly scheduled executive sessions with only non-management directors; or have at least one executive session of solely independent directors each year.
|
We are an emerging growth company
within the meaning of the Exchange Act and, if we decide to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements
applicable to emerging growth companies, our common stock could be less attractive to investors.
We are an “emerging
growth company” within the meaning of the rules under the Exchange Act. We are eligible to take advantage of certain exemptions
from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including,
but not limited to, not being required to comply with any PCAOB rules, that, if adopted in the future, would require mandatory
audit firm rotation and auditor discussion and analysis pursuant to any future audit rule promulgated by the PCAOB (unless the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, determines otherwise). In addition, we are not subject to the additional level
of review of our internal control over financial reporting as may occur when outside auditors attest as to our internal control
over financial reporting. As a result, our stockholders may not have access to certain information they may deem important. We
will remain an emerging growth company for up to five years from the date of our initial public offering of securities under an
effective registration statement under the Securities Act, though we may cease to be an emerging growth company earlier under certain
circumstances.
We take advantage of
the exemption from the auditor attestation report requirement and may decide to rely on other exemptions in the future. We do not
know if some investors will find our common stock less attractive as a result. The result may be a less active trading market for
our common stock, and our stock price may be more volatile.
Brazilian tax laws may have an adverse
impact on the taxes applicable to the disposition of our common shares and ADSs.
Under Law No. 10,833/2003,
the gain on the disposition or sale of assets located in Brazil by a non-Brazilian resident, whether to another non-Brazilian resident
or to a Brazilian resident, may be subject to income tax withholding in Brazil. With respect to the disposition of our common shares,
as they are assets located in Brazil, a non-Brazilian resident should be subject to income tax on the gains assessed, regardless
of whether the transactions are conducted in Brazil or with a Brazilian resident. With respect to our ADSs, although the matter
is not entirely clear, arguably the gains realized by a non-Brazilian resident upon the disposition of ADSs to another non-Brazilian
resident will not be taxed in Brazil, on the basis that ADSs are not “assets located in Brazil” for the purposes of
Law No. 10,833/2003. We cannot assure you, however, that the Brazilian tax authorities or the Brazilian courts will agree with
this interpretation. As a result, gains on a disposition of ADSs by a non-Brazilian resident to a Brazilian resident, or even to
a non-Brazilian resident, in the event that courts determine that ADSs would constitute assets located in Brazil, may be subject
to income tax in Brazil. See “Item 10—Additional Information—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations.”
The imposition of IOF taxes may indirectly
influence the price and volatility of our ADSs and our common shares.
Brazilian law imposes
the Tax on Foreign Exchange Transactions, or the IOF/Exchange tax, on the conversion of reais into foreign currency and
on the conversion of foreign currency into reais. Brazilian law also imposes the Tax on Transactions Involving Bonds and
Securities, or the IOF/Securities tax, due on transactions involving bonds and securities, including those carried out on a Brazilian
stock exchange.
The IOF/Exchange tax
was raised from zero to 6% on October 20, 2009. As of December 1, 2011, certain investments were excluded from the 6% tax and subject
instead to a 2% IOF/Exchange tax. In 2009, the IOF/Securities tax was increased from zero to 1.5% on shares issued by a Brazilian
company and listed on a Brazilian stock exchange for the purpose of allowing depositary receipts traded outside Brazil to be issued.
In 2011, the IOF/Securities tax was increased from zero to 1% on currency-related derivative transactions resulting in an increase
of the short position exposure in foreign currency or in a decrease of the long position in foreign currency. Since June 30, 2013,
the IOF/Exchange tax and the IOF/Securities tax rates have been zero.
The imposition of these
taxes may discourage foreign investment in shares of Brazilian companies, including our company, due to higher transaction costs,
and may negatively impact the price and volatility of our ADSs and common shares if they become listed on a stock exchange in the
United States, as well as on the B3.
We may be classified as a passive
foreign investment company, which could result in adverse U.S. tax consequences for U.S. investors.
We may be classified
as a passive foreign investment company (a “PFIC”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Such characterization could
result in adverse U.S. tax consequences to you if you are a U.S. Holder (as defined in “Item 10—Additional Information—Taxation—U.S.
Federal Income Tax Considerations”) of our common shares or ADSs. For example, if we are a PFIC, U.S. Holders of our common
shares or ADSs may become subject to increased tax liabilities under U.S. tax laws and regulations and will become subject to burdensome
reporting requirements. The determination of whether or not we are a PFIC is made on an annual basis and will depend on the composition
of our income and assets from time to time. Specifically, for any taxable year we will be classified as a PFIC for U.S. tax purposes
if either (i) 75% or more of our gross income in that taxable year is passive income or (ii) the average percentage of our assets
by value in that taxable year that produce or are held for the production of passive income is at least 50%. For this purpose,
income from commodities transactions is generally considered passive unless such income is derived in the active conduct of a commodities
business.
See “Item 10—Additional
Information—Taxation—U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Passive Foreign Investment Company.”
ITEM 4—INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
|
A.
|
History
and Development of the Company Overview
|
Our legal and commercial
name is BrasilAgro—Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas. We are a corporation (sociedade por ações)
organized under the laws of Brazil, and were incorporated on September 23, 2005. Our principal offices are located at Avenida Brigadeiro
Faria Lima, 1309, 5th floor, São Paulo, SP 0145-002, Brazil, and our telephone number is +55 11 3035 5350.
We are focused on the
acquisition, development and exploration of agricultural properties that we believe possess significant potential for cash flow
generation and value appreciation. We seek to transform our acquired properties through investments in infrastructure and technologies
which permit cultivation of high value-added crops (soybean, corn, sugarcane and others) and cattle raising and from time to time
sell our developed properties in order to realize capital gains.
Since our initial public
equity offering and listing in Brazil on the B3 stock exchange in April 2006, or the IPO, and the subsequent commencement of our
operations until the date hereof, we acquired 15 agricultural properties in seven Brazilian states, aggregating 300,288 hectares,
of which 198,316 hectares were arable but less than 15% of which were cultivated when acquired and 101,972 hectares were protected
by environmental regulation. Since then, four of our agricultural properties were fully sold and four of our agricultural properties
were partly sold, representing in the aggregate a total area of 84,958 hectares. As of the date hereof, we hold 269,065 hectares,
including 53,735 hectares leased.
In December 2013, we
acquired a 50% interest in Cresca S.A., a company that owns 141,931 hectares of rural land in Paraguay, of which approximately
71,000 hectares were arable, but less than 12,000 hectares of which were cultivated when acquired, and approximately 70,931 were
protected by environmental regulation. On October 5, 2016, we entered into an agreement with Carlos Casado S.A. (“Carlos
Casado”), our partner in Cresca at the time, pursuant to which we agreed to try to sell all the land that Cresca owned for
a 120-day period as of the execution date of the aforementioned agreement. Further to the provisions of the agreement, we and Carlos
Casado also agreed to split ownership of the land among us and Carlos Casado if either party failed to dispose of the totality
of the land within the 120-day period.
As the properties were
not sold to third-parties, on June 6 and June 8, 2017, we and Carlos Casado decided to proceed with the redistribution of assets
and liabilities of Cresca, whereby we would separate and divide the assets and liabilities of Cresca, and Cresca would re-distribute
them to us and to Carlos Casado. As a result of this transaction, we now have the following two subsidiaries that received Cresca’s
assets and liabilities: (i) Palmeiras S.A. (“Palmeiras”), which was incorporated on December 16, 2016 to operate the
activities of our investment in Cresca S.A. and (ii) Agropecuária Moroti S.A. (“Moroti”), a subsidiary that
received, on February 9, 2018, upon the conclusion of the re-distribution of assets and liabilities process, all other assets and
liabilities of Cresca attributed to BrasilAgro, including land and debts.
On February 9, 2018,
the re-distribution of assets and liabilities of Cresca was concluded and the portion of assets and liabilities attributed to us
was transferred to the wholly-owned subsidiary Moroti. As of June 30, 2020, Moroti owned 59,585 hectares, of which 34,673 were
arable.
On November 22, 2019,
we entered into a merger agreement (the “Merger Agreement”) with Agrifirma Holding S.A. (“Agrifirma Holding”).
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, Agrifima Holding would be merged into us and we would receive all of its assets, rights
and obligations, holding 100% of the equity capital of the subsidiary Agrifirma Agro Ltda. and its subsidiaries, in exchange for
common shares and warrants (“Agrifirma Warrants”) issued by BrasilAgro to the selling shareholders of Agrifirma Holding
(the “Merger”).
Agrifirma Agro Ltda.
and its subsidiaries (“Agrifirma”) are engaged in the production, manufacture, storage and trading of agricultural
products and the provision of agricultural services, as well as the management and commercial exploration of the properties that
it owns. Since Agrifirma is engaged in operations in the same sector as BrasilAgro, we expect the following impacts by reason of
the merger: operational, financial and commercial benefits, such as dilution of general and administrative expenses, capture of
synergies and economies of scale in the operations and potential appreciation of undeveloped areas.
Agrifirma is comprised
of its parent company (Agrifirma Agro Ltda.) and four subsidiaries, namely Agrifirma Bahia Agropecuária Ltda., I. A. Agro
Ltda., GL Agropecuária Empreendimentos e Participações Ltda. and Agrifirma S.R.L.
The completion of the
Merger was subject to certain requirements and conditions precedent, which were met on January 27, 2020, following which BrasilAgro
obtained control of Agrifirma. The Merger was accounted for pursuant to IFRS 3 – Business Combinations. Please see Note
1.1 to the financial statements included in this annual report.
Following the Merger,
we added 28,930 hectares to our property portfolio, consisting of land located in the Western region of the State of Bahia, near
our Jatobá and Chaparral farms, which are suitable for grain production and cattle raising. After the Merger, the total
number of our outstanding shares is 62,104,301.
We invested more than
R$1,013.3 million since our IPO to acquire, develop and transform agricultural properties.
We will continue the
investments to develop and transform our agricultural properties in Brazil and Paraguay. In this regard, we will continue to apply
for financing with government development banks.
From July 1, 2016 until
the date hereof:
|
●
|
in June 2020, we sold an area of 1,875 hectares (1,500 arable hectares)
in the Jatobá farm, located in Jaborandi, in the State of Bahia. The total amount of the sale was 300 soybean bags per arable
hectare, or R$45.0 million (approximately R$30,010 per arable hectare);
|
|
●
|
in April 2020, we acquired the Serra Grande farm, located in the municipality
of Baixa Grande do Ribeiro, in the State of Piauí. The Serra Grande farm has an area of 4,489 hectares, 2,904 hectares of
which are arable to be developed, suitable for the cultivation of grains. The acquisition price was approximately R$25.0 million
(R$8,600 per arable hectare);
|
|
●
|
in May 2020, we sold an area of 105 hectares (105 arable hectares)
in the Alto Taquari farm, located in Alto Taquari, in the State of Mato Grosso. The total amount of the sale was 1,100 soybean
bags per arable hectare, or R$11.0 million (approximately R$105,000 per arable hectare);
|
|
●
|
in January 2020, we concluded the merger of Agrifirma into us, which
added 28,930 hectares to our property portfolio;
|
|
●
|
in October 2019, we made an investment of US$ 1.0 million in Ag-Fintech
Agrofy, or Agrofy, which represented a 1.8% stake in the share capital of Agrofy. Agrofy is an online marketplace that offers a
complete range of e-commerce solutions customized to meet the needs of retailers and their partners, seeking an alternative way
of connecting farmers and suppliers;
|
|
●
|
in October 2019, we sold an area of 85 hectares (65 arable hectares)
in the Alto Taquari farm, located in Alto Taquari, in the State of Mato Grosso. The total amount of the sale was 1,100 soybean
bags per arable hectare, or R$5.5 million (approximately R$84,817 per arable hectare);
|
|
●
|
in August 2019, we sold an area of 1,134 hectares (893 arable hectares)
in the Jatobá farm, located in Jaborandi, in the State of Bahia. The total amount of the sale was 302 soybean bags per arable
hectare, or R$23.2 million (approximately R$25,961 per arable hectare);
|
|
●
|
during the 2019/2020 crop year, we developed 2,000 hectares of our
215,330 hectares of arable land through the cultivation of soybeans and other value-added crops;
|
|
●
|
in June 2019, we sold an area of 3,124 hectares (2,473 arable hectares) in the Jatobá farm, located in Jaborandi, in the State of Bahia. The total amount of the sale was 285 soybean bags per arable hectare, or R$58.1 million (approximately R$23,500 per arable hectare);
|
|
●
|
in November 2018, we sold an area of 103 hectares (103 arable hectares) in the Alto Taquari farm, located in Alto Taquari, in the State of Mato Grosso. The total amount of the sale was 1,100 soybean bags per arable hectare, or R$8.0 million (approximately R$77,690 per arable hectare);
|
|
●
|
during the 2018/2019 crop year, we developed 2,000 hectares of our 169,270 hectares of arable land through the cultivation of soybeans and other value-added crops;
|
|
●
|
on August 28, 2018, we leased an area of 23,568 hectares, located in the municipality of São Félix do Araguaia, in the State of Mato Grosso. The new farm was named Partnership V. The lease agreement has a term of up to 10 years and was followed market prices practiced in the region;
|
|
●
|
in July 2018, we sold an area of 9,784 hectares (7,485 arable hectares) in the Jatobá farm, located in Jaborandi, State of Bahia. The total amount of the sale was 285 soybean bags per arable hectare, or R$164.8 million (approximately R$22,018 per arable hectare);
|
|
●
|
during the 2017/2018 crop year, we developed 2,000 hectares of our 172,032 hectares of arable land through the cultivation of soybeans and other value-added crops;
|
|
●
|
in May 2018, we sold an area of 956 hectares (660 arable hectares) in the Araucária farm, located in Mineiros, State of Goiás. The total amount of the sale was 1,208 soybean bags per arable hectare, or R$52.4 million (approximately R$79,393 per arable hectare);
|
|
●
|
in May 2018, we issued Agribusiness Receivables Certificates (ARC) in the aggregate amount of R$142.2 million. The ARCs are secured by debentures that were issued in two series, the first in the amount of R$85.2 million, and the second in the amount of R$57 million. The first series of debentures will mature on August 1, 2022 and be repaid in three annual installments starting on July 30, 2020, and accrue interest at 106.5% of the DI rate, payable on July 30 of each year. The second series of debentures will mature on July 31, 2023 and be repaid in four annual installments starting on July 30, 2020, and accrue interest at 110.0% of the DI rate, payable on July 30 of each year;
|
|
●
|
on February 9, 2018, the re-distribution of assets and liabilities of Cresca was concluded and the portion of assets and liabilities attributed to us was transferred to the wholly-owned subsidiary Moroti. As of June 30, 2020, Moroti owned 59,585 hectares, of which 34,673 were arable;
|
|
●
|
in June 2017, we sold an area in the Jatobá Farm, a rural property located in the State of Bahia. A total of 625 hectares (500 hectares of arable land) were sold, worth 300 soybean bags per hectare of arable land or R$10.1 million (approximately R$20,180/ha);
|
|
●
|
in March 2017 and May 2017, we sold two areas in the Araucaria Farm, a rural property located in the State of Goias. In March 2017, 274 hectares (200 hectares of arable land) were sold in the amount of 1,000 soybean bags per hectare of arable land or R$12.5 million (R$13.2 million nominal value/approximately R$66,227/ha). The second area, sold in May 2017, totaled 1,360 hectares (918 hectares of arable land), worth 280 soybean bags per hectare or arable land or R$17.0 million (approximately R$18,535/ha). It is important to highlight that this area includes a lowland area and, therefore, the value of the sale per hectare of arable land is lower compared to the sale held in the same farm in March, which consisted of a plateau area;
|
|
●
|
we conducted a purchase and agricultural partnership for a property in state of Maranhão, whereby we acquired 17,566 hectares, 10,137 hectares of arable land in February 2017, that has already been developed, and will be used for the planting of grain crops. The other 7,566 hectares are permanent preservation and legal reserve areas. The acquisition price is R$100.0 million (R$10 thousand/hectare of arable land) and the agricultural partnership consists of 15,000 of arable and developed land, already planted mostly with sugarcane. The Agricultural Partnership has a term of 15 years, which may be extended for the same period;
|
|
●
|
during 2016/2017 crop year, we developed 5,117 hectares of our 199,114 hectares of arable land through the cultivation of soybeans and other value-added crops;
|
|
●
|
on October 5, 2016, we entered into an agreement with Carlos Casado, our partner in Cresca, to try to sell all the land that Cresca owned or to split ownership of the land between us and Carlos Casado if a 120 day period since execution of the agreement lapsed;
|
The map below indicates
the location of our agricultural properties, their arable areas and their current or intended production activities as of September
30, 2020:
|
|
Property
|
|
Location
|
|
Acquisition/Lease Date
|
|
Total Area
|
|
|
Arable Area
|
|
|
Project
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ha)
|
|
|
(ha)
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Jatobá Farm
|
|
Jaborandi/BA
|
|
March 2007
|
|
|
14,930
|
|
|
|
11,590
|
|
|
Grains and Pasture
|
|
Owned
|
2
|
|
Alto Taquari Farm
|
|
Alto Taquari/MT
|
|
August 2007
|
|
|
5,103
|
|
|
|
3,503
|
|
|
Sugarcane
|
|
Owned
|
3
|
|
Araucária Farm
|
|
Mineiros/GO
|
|
April 2007
|
|
|
5,534
|
|
|
|
4,051
|
|
|
Sugarcane
|
|
Owned
|
4
|
|
Chaparral Farm
|
|
Correntina/BA
|
|
November 2007
|
|
|
37,182
|
|
|
|
26,444
|
|
|
Grains and Cotton
|
|
Owned
|
5
|
|
Nova Buriti Farm
|
|
Januaria/MG
|
|
December 2007
|
|
|
24,212
|
|
|
|
17,846
|
|
|
Forest
|
|
Owned
|
6
|
|
Preferência Farm
|
|
Barreiras/BA
|
|
September 2008
|
|
|
17,799
|
|
|
|
12,410
|
|
|
Grains and Pasture
|
|
Owned
|
7
|
|
Moroti Farm(1)
|
|
Boqueron/ Paraguay
|
|
February 2018
|
|
|
59,585
|
|
|
|
34,673
|
|
|
Grains and Pasture
|
|
Owned
|
8
|
|
Partnership II Farm(2)
|
|
Ribeiro Gonçalves/PI
|
|
November 2013
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
Grains
|
|
Leased
|
9
|
|
Partnership III Farm(3)
|
|
Alto Taquari/MT
|
|
May 2015
|
|
|
5,624
|
|
|
|
5,624
|
|
|
Sugarcane
|
|
Leased
|
10
|
|
Partnership IV Farm(4)
|
|
São Raimundo das Mangabeiras/MA
|
|
February 2017
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
Sugarcane
|
|
Leased
|
11
|
|
São José Farm
|
|
São Raimundo das Mangabeiras/MA
|
|
February 2017
|
|
|
17,566
|
|
|
|
10,137
|
|
|
Grains and Sugarcane
|
|
Owned
|
12
|
|
Partnership V Farm(5)
|
|
São Félix do Araguáia/MT
|
|
August 2018
|
|
|
20,138
|
|
|
|
20,138
|
|
|
Grains
|
|
Leased
|
13
|
|
Arrojadinho Farm(6)
|
|
Jaborandi/BA
|
|
January 2020
|
|
|
16,642
|
|
|
|
10,306
|
|
|
Grains
|
|
Owned
|
14
|
|
Rio do Meio Farm(7)
|
|
Jaborandi/BA
|
|
January 2020
|
|
|
12,288
|
|
|
|
8,501
|
|
|
Grains
|
|
Owned
|
15
|
|
Serra Grande Farm
|
|
Baixa Grande do Ribeiro/PI
|
|
April 2020
|
|
|
4,489
|
|
|
|
2,904
|
|
|
Grains
|
|
Owned
|
16
|
|
Partnership VII Farm(8)
|
|
Baixa Grande do Ribeiro/PI
|
|
December 2019
|
|
|
5,473
|
|
|
|
5,473
|
|
|
Grains
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
269,065
|
|
|
|
196,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
New
corporate name of the operations in Paraguay. In the year ended June 30, 2020, we reassessed land use planning and adjusted the
farm area.
|
|
(2)
|
BrasilAgro entered into an agricultural exploration partnership
with respect to the Partnership II Farm for up to 11 harvests, involving up to 10,000 hectares.
|
|
(3)
|
BrasilAgro entered into an agricultural exploration partnership
with respect to the Partnership III Farm with a term valid until March 31, 2026.
|
|
(4)
|
BrasilAgro entered into an agricultural exploration partnership
with respect to the Partnership IV Farm for a term of 15 years for planting sugarcane, with an option to renew for another 15
years.
|
|
(5)
|
BrasilAgro entered into an agricultural exploration partnership
with respect to the Partnership V Farm for a term of up to 10 years.
|
|
(6)
|
Previously referred to as Partnership VI, the farm was
acquired through the Merger of Agrifirma.
|
|
(7)
|
Farm acquired through the Merger of Agrifirma.
|
|
(8)
|
BrasilAgro entered into an agricultural exploration partnership
with respect to the Partnership VII Farm for a term of up to 10 years.
|
We have a policy of
performing annual appraisals of the fair market value of our agricultural properties. We estimate the market value of our agricultural
properties based on each property’s level of development, soil quality and maturity and agricultural potential. For more
information concerning our estimates of the fair market value of our agricultural properties, see Note 10 to our financial statements
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020.
Our estimates of the
market value of our agricultural properties are based on several assumptions, methodologies, estimates and subjective judgments,
all of which are inherently subject to significant commercial, economic, competitive and operational uncertainties, most of which
are beyond our control and unforeseeable and therefore no assurance can be given that they are correct. Furthermore, market values
of real estate are subject to significant fluctuations and are also subject to significant commercial, economic and competitive
uncertainties, most of which are beyond our control, and thus such estimates should not be considered as indicative of the values
that we will or may be able to receive in exchange for such properties. For more information on the risks we are exposed to, see
“Item 3—Key Information—Risk Factors.” The table below indicates the historical cost of acquisition of
the land and of subsequent improvements, as well as the estimated fair market value, with respect to our agricultural properties,
as of June 30, 2020.
The SEC maintains an
internet website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding companies
that file or furnish documents electronically to the SEC, including us. Our internet website is www.brasil-agro.com. The information
included on our internet website or the information that might be accessed through such website is not included in this annual
report and is not incorporated into this annual report by reference.
Property
|
|
Location
|
|
Acquisition Date
|
|
Total Area
|
|
|
Land and Improvement Cost as of
June 30,
2020(1)
|
|
|
Estimated Fair Market Value as of June 30,
2020
|
|
|
Appreciation(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ha)
|
|
|
(R$ millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jatobá Farm
|
|
Jaborandi/BA
|
|
March 2007
|
|
|
14,930
|
|
|
|
28.4
|
|
|
|
242.5
|
|
|
|
755
|
%
|
Alto Taquari Farm
|
|
Alto Taquari/MT
|
|
August 2007
|
|
|
5,103
|
|
|
|
33.3
|
|
|
|
194.5
|
|
|
|
485
|
%
|
Araucária Farm
|
|
Mineiros/GO
|
|
April 2007
|
|
|
5,534
|
|
|
|
45.5
|
|
|
|
190.3
|
|
|
|
318
|
%
|
Chaparral Farm
|
|
Correntina/BA
|
|
November 2007
|
|
|
37,182
|
|
|
|
89.6
|
|
|
|
417.7
|
|
|
|
366
|
%
|
Nova Buriti Farm
|
|
Januaria/MG
|
|
December 2007
|
|
|
24,212
|
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
35.3
|
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
Preferência Farm
|
|
Barreiras/BA
|
|
September 2008
|
|
|
17,799
|
|
|
|
27.1
|
|
|
|
68.2
|
|
|
|
152
|
%
|
Moroti Farm
|
|
Boqueron Paraguay
|
|
February 2018
|
|
|
59,585
|
|
|
|
233.0
|
|
|
|
235.3
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
São José Farm
|
|
São Raimundo das Mangabeiras/MA
|
|
February 2017
|
|
|
17,566
|
|
|
|
110.4
|
|
|
|
247.6
|
|
|
|
124
|
%
|
Arrojadinho Farm
|
|
Jaborandi/BA
|
|
January 2020
|
|
|
16,642
|
|
|
|
84.8
|
|
|
|
88.5
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Rio do Meio Farm
|
|
Jaborandi/BA
|
|
January 2020
|
|
|
12,288
|
|
|
|
120.8
|
|
|
|
123.1
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Serra Grande Farm
|
|
Baixa Grande do Ribeiro/PI
|
|
April 2020
|
|
|
4,489
|
|
|
|
26.1
|
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215,330
|
|
|
|
822.3
|
|
|
|
1,873.3
|
|
|
|
128
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Consists
of land and capital expenditures, including buildings, infrastructure and other improvements to the property, net of depreciation
expenses.
|
|
(2)
|
Appreciation
includes the impact of inflation since the acquisition date.
|
We are focused on the
acquisition, development and exploration of agricultural properties that we believe possess significant potential for cash flow
generation and value appreciation. We seek to transform our acquired properties through investments in infrastructure and technologies
which permit cultivation of high value-added crops (soybean, corn, sugarcane and other) and cattle raising and from time to time
sell our developed properties in order to realize capital gains. We are currently involved in several farming activities, including
grains and sugarcane production and cattle raising.
Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Government measures in Brazil
In light of the COVID-19
pandemic outbreak, the Brazilian government created a crisis committee to monitor the impact of COVID-19 in March 2020. Since then,
it has announced several measures (tax and others) to address the effects of COVID-19. In this regard, the Brazilian health authorities,
as well as several state and municipal authorities have adopted or recommended social distancing measures. Likewise, the Brazilian
Congress is currently discussing several measures to increase the Brazilian government’s revenues, such as imposing new taxes,
revoking tax benefits and increasing the rates of current taxes, including revoking the tax exemption granted to dividend distributions
paid by Brazilian companies, which could affect the return of our investments, as well as of our shareholders.
In Brazil, states and
municipalities may also revoke tax benefits and increase the rates of current taxes to increase their revenues
Company measures
In order to guarantee
the hygiene and safety conditions established by the Brazilian Ministry of Health (Ministério da Saúde) and
to preserve the health of our employees, we have adopted a plan with several measures established especifically for this purpose.
Key initiatives were
the creation of a Prevention and Risk Committee, implementing remote work arrangements and the adoption of several measures and
protocols to preserve the safety of all people involved in our operations, following the guidelines established by the Brazilian
Ministry of Health (Ministério da Saúde).
Measures were also
taken to support our operations and preserve cash, such as:
|
●
|
contracting new lines of credit, such as financing for agricultural
cost, sugarcane and for working capital purposes;
|
|
●
|
early delivery of inputs; and
|
|
●
|
anticipating sales of agricultural products to ensure greater storage
capacity.
|
Additionally, as of June 30, 2020, although
we did not record material losses or gains in our 2020 financial results directly related to the pandemic, we continue to monitor
possible future impacts due to:
|
●
|
exchange rate volatility, in connection with derivative operations
related to currency operations and operations with commodities that we enter into to guarantee production margins in financial
operations. For more information, see “Item 5—Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Results of Operations.”
|
|
●
|
volatility in sugar and ethanol prices and the consequent impact on
sugarcane demand and prices;
|
|
●
|
changes in the expected sugarcane payment cycle arising from negotiations
with our customers; as of June 30, 2020 none of our customers had missed payments; and
|
|
●
|
volatility in other commodity prices.
|
Our operations in Brazil
and Paraguay continue without any material changes. Most of our business operations have not experienced any major disruption.
Agricultural Activities and Products
Independent Production
As of June 30, 2020,
we were the operators with respect to our entire portfolio of agricultural properties. In the context of our independent operations,
we maintain exclusive control over our production and exclusive responsibility for the acquisition of inputs, raw materials and
equipment, hiring and oversight of employees, and infrastructure investment. We currently sell a substantial portion of our production
to a small number of import/export companies or customers who have substantial bargaining power. Our net revenue was R$487.6 million
for the year ended June 30, 2020 and R$357.9 million for the year ended June 30, 2019. All of our sales are to customers located
in Brazil and Paraguay.
We enter into short-term
contractual arrangements with third-party contractors, at all stages of the production process, for the provision of services (including
our workforce), equipment, and infrastructure needs. We believe that this allows us to be more agile in adapting to market conditions
as they unfold.
Our agricultural properties
are managed by local managers, either on a regional level or for specific properties, depending on the location and size of each
property. As of June 30, 2020, we had one senior general manager for all of our farms, one manager at the São José
Farm and Partnership IV farms, one manager at the Serra Grande, Partnership II and Partership VII farms, one manager at the Arrojadinho
and Jatobá farms, one manager at the Chaparral and Rio do Meio farms, one manager at the Preferência Farm, one manager
at the Partnership V farm, one regional manager at the Araucária, Alto Taquari and Partnership III farms, and one manager
at the Moroti Farm.
Leases
As an alternative to
independent production, we leased in the past, and may lease again in the future, our agricultural properties to third parties.
Generally, our leases
are subject to different obligations depending on the stage of development of the subject property. With respect to leases of our
properties on which the land is undeveloped, lessees are subject to several terms and conditions, including requirements to invest
and to use the techniques and equipment that we believe are necessary and appropriate for the preparation and correction of the
soil in order to facilitate agricultural production. In addition to leases of land, we may also lease individual farmhouses or
warehouses to lessees, pursuant to which we receive a portion of the agricultural production, in kind, produced by the lessee.
Our leases generally last between three to ten years. Under Brazilian law, lessees have a right of first refusal to purchase farms
when they are leased by them.
Grains
The planting season
for grains runs from September to December, and harvest occurs between February and May of each year. During the planting season
for our 2019/2020 crop year, we planted 81,905 hectares of grains at our grain farms in Brazil and Paraguay. For the years ended
June 30, 2020 and 2019, net revenue from sale of grains accounted for 47.9% and 47.9% of our net revenue, respectively.
All distribution of
production from the farms is through road transportation. We enter into third-party service contracts to transport production from
our farms to our storage facilities or to our customers.
Sugarcane
The sugarcane planting
season runs from February to May of each year, and harvest occurs between April and November of each year. On June 30, 2020, we
had 29,169 hectares planted with sugarcane at our Araucária, Alto Taquari, São José Farm, Partnership III
and Partnership IV farms.
We entered into a supply
contract with Brenco, pursuant to which we currently supply the entirety of our sugarcane production from our Alto Taquari, Araucária,
and Partnership III farms to them. The term of this supply contract covers two full crop cycles, which consists of six crop years
and five harvests, and is scheduled to expire in 2021/2022. In the year ended June 30, 2020 and as of the date hereof, Brenco has
not defaulted on the payment of any receivable. We currently run the risk of default by Brenco, our main customer, associated with
the fact that its controlling shareholder, Odebrecht S.A., is being investigated by the Brazilian Federal Police for corruption
in the operation called “Lava Jato” (Car Wash) and the fact that Brenco filed for reorganization bankruptcy in Brazil
(recuperação judicial) in May 2019.
In the table below,
we present the aging of the receivables from Brenco, based on contractual terms.
|
|
As of
June 30,
2020
|
|
Falling due:
|
|
(in R$ thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up to 30 days
|
|
|
10,402
|
|
30 to 90 days
|
|
|
—
|
|
91 to 180 days
|
|
|
—
|
|
181 to 360 days
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
Total
|
|
|
11,972
|
|
On May 8, 2015, we
entered into a lease agreement with respect to a property located in the municipalities of Alto Taquari and Alto Araguaia, in the
state of Mato Grosso (“Partnership III”), pursuant to which we have the right to operate an area of 4,263 hectares
by March 31, 2026. The properties are close to Alto Taquari Farm, a region that has had excellent sugarcane production results.
This transaction allows us to make use of the operational structure and team already present in the region and ensure greater property
management flexibility.
We entered into a supply
contract with Agro Serra, pursuant to which we currently supply the entirety of our sugarcane production from our Partnership IV
farm to them. The term of this supply contract is 15 years, renewable for another 15 years.
For the years ended
June 30, 2020 and 2019, net revenue from the sale of sugarcane accounted for 39.6% and 44.8% of our net revenue, respectively.
Our farm output is
distributed through road transportation. We enter into third-party service contracts with trucking companies to transport production
from our farms to our customers’ sugar and ethanol refineries.
Livestock
As of June 30, 2020,
we had 15,064 head of cattle distributed over 13,721 hectares of active pasture.
Cotton
The planting season
for cotton runs from September to December of each year, and the harvest occurs between February and May of each year. During the
planting season for our 2019/2020 crop year, we planted 1,713 hectares of cotton at our Chaparral farm. For the year ended June
30, 2020, net revenue from the sale of cotton accounted for 2.7% of our revenue.
Others
As of June 30, 2020,
we had 24,212 hectares of farmland at our Nova Buriti farm. We are currently in the process of obtaining the necessary permits
in order to begin operations. Due to the difficulties we have been facing in regard to obtaining licenses for the farm, we are
studying alternatives for the property. One such option is to sell the farm to offset the legal reserve, a mechanism contemplated
in the environmental code pursuant to which holders of a legal reserve deficit can acquire another area to solve certain issues.
Investment properties
As of June 30, 2020,
the net book value of our investment properties was R$858.3 million, of which R$686.1 million represented land acquisition costs
and R$172.2 million (net of accumulated depreciation) represented improvements, including building and infrastructure improvements
and costs of clearing and preparing the land. For the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, gains on farm sales accounted for R$61.4
million and R$142.8 million, respectively.
Agricultural Properties
As of June 30, 2020,
we owned eleven agricultural properties, totaling 196,100 hectares of arable land (not including environmental preservation areas
in accordance with Brazilian and Paraguayan environmental law), including 53,735 hectares of leased area, located in the Brazilian
States of Mato Grosso, Goiás, Minas Gerais, Maranhão, Bahia, Piauí and in Paraguay. During the planting season
for our 2019/2020 crop year, we planted 54,342 hectares of soybean, 24,939 hectares of corn (1st and 2nd
crops), 29,169 hectares of sugarcane, 23,561 hectares of other grains (sesame, sorghum and others and leased areas to third parties),
2,624 hectares of beans, 1,713 hectares of cotton and 16,806 hectares of pasture. Except for part of the Nova Buriti farm, we acquire
and hold our agricultural properties through subsidiaries, a structure we believe will simplify the future sale of such properties
in accordance with Brazilian law. In addition, we entered into rural partnerships to operate agricultural properties, the Partnerships
II, III, IV, V and VII.
São José
Farm: As of June 30, 2020, the São José farm had an area of 17,566 hectares. The São José farm
was acquired by our subsidiary Imobiliária Ceibo Ltda. in February 2017 for R$100.0 million. The property is located in
the State of Maranhão, in the Northeastern region of Brazil.
We acquired 17,566
hectares, 10,137 hectares of which are arable and have already been developed, and will be used for the planting of grain crops.
The other 7,429 hectares are permanent preservation and legal reserve areas. The acquisition price is R$100.0 million (R$10 thousand/arable
hectare).
The agricultural partnership
consists of 15,000 hectares of arable and developed land, already planted mostly with sugarcane. The agricultural partnership has
a term of 15 years, which may be extended for the same period.
During the planting
season for our 2019/2020 crop year, we planted 4,836 hectares of soybean, 580 hectares of corn, 631 hectares of second corn crop
and 18,668 hectares of sugarcane at the São José farm.
Jatobá
Farm: As of June 30, 2020, the Jatobá farm had an area of 14,930 hectares. The Jatobá farm was acquired by
us, in partnership with Grupo Maeda, in 2007, for R$33.0 million. On May 12, 2012, we acquired Grupo Maeda’s partnership
stake and became 100% owners of the Jatobá farm, through our subsidiary Jaborandi Propriedades Agrícolas. The property
is located in the Municipality of Jaborandi, State of Bahia, in the Northeastern region of Brazil, which we believe to be advantageous
for export purposes due to the presence of the Port of Candeias in the State of Bahia.
On June 30, 2017, we
sold 625 hectares of our Jatobá farm, 500 of which are arable, for a total sale price of R$10.1 million, equivalent to 300
soybean bags per arable hectare. In July 2018, we sold 9,784 hectares of our Jatobá farm, 7,485 of which are arable, for
a total sale price of R$164.8 million, equivalent to 285 soybean bags per arable hectare. In June 2019, we sold 3,124 hectares
of our Jatobá farm, 2,473 of which are arable, for a total sale price of R$58.1 million, equivalent to 285 soybean bags
per arable hectare. In September 2019, we sold 1,134 hectares of our Jatobá farm, 893 of which are arable, for a total sale
price of R$23.2 million, equivalent to 302 soybean bags per arable hectare. In June 2020, we sold 1,875 hectares of our Jatobá
farm, 1,500 of which are arable, for a total sale price of R$45.0 million, equivalent to 300 soybean bags per arable hectare. After
these sales, the area of the Jatobá farm held by us is 14,930 hectares, of which approximately 11,590 hectares are arable.
Alto Taquari
Farm: As of June 30, 2020, the Alto Taquari farm had an area of 5,103 hectares. The Alto Taquari farm was acquired by our
subsidiary Imobiliária Mogno in August 2007 for R$33.2 million. The deed was granted in September 2015 after we paid the
outstanding balance of R$27.4 million. Prior to our acquisition, the Alto Taquari farm was used for grain cultivation and cattle
raising. As of June 30, 2020, we planted 2,525 hectares of sugarcane, 784 hectares of soybeans and 663 hectares of second corn
crop. The 2009/2010 crop year marked the beginning of our obligations in compliance with our supply contract with Brenco, under
which we supply the entirety of our sugarcane production from the Alto Taquari farm to them for a term of two complete crop cycles
(six crop years and five harvests), which is expected to end in 2023. The property is located in the Municipality of Alto Taquari,
State of Mato Grosso.
In November 2018, we
sold 103 hectares of our Alto Taquari farm, all of which are arable, for a total sale price of R$8.0 million, equivalent to 1,100
soybean bags per arable hectare. In October 2019, we sold 85 hectares of our Alto Taquari farm, 65 of which are arable, for a total
sale price of R$5.5 million, equivalent to 1,100 soybean bags per arable hectare. In May 2020, we sold 105 hectares of our Alto
Taquari farm, all of which are arable, for a total sale price of R$11.0 million, equivalent to 1,100 soybean bags per arable hectare.
After these sales, the area of the Alto Taquari farm held by us is 5,103 hectares, of which approximately 3,503 hectares are arable.
Araucária
Farm: As of June 30, 2020, the Araucária farm had an area of 5,534 hectares. The Araucária farm was acquired
by our subsidiary Imobiliária Araucária in April 2007, in partnership with Brenco, in the proportion of 75% and 25%,
respectively, for the total amount of R$80.0 million. The deed for Araucária farm was granted on November 20, 2008, and
it was registered on November 24, 2008, upon which our partnership with Brenco was terminated and we remained the sole owners of
9,682 hectares of the Araucária farm, equivalent to R$70.7 million. The property is located in the Municipality of Mineiros,
in the State of Goiás, and is primarily used for the cultivation of sugarcane and grain.
On May 2018, we sold
956 hectares of our Araucária Farm, 660 of which are arable (for a total sale price of R$52.4 million, equivalent to 1,208
soybean bags per arable hectare). On March 27, 2017, we sold 274 hectares of our Araucária Farm, 200 of which are arable,
for a total sale price of R$12.5 million or (R$13.2 million nominal value, equivalent to 1,000 soybean bags). On May 30, 2017,
we sold 1,360 hectares of our Araucária Farm, 918 of which are arable, for a total sale price of R$17.0 million, equivalent
to 280 soybean bags. On April 25, 2013, we sold 394 hectares of our Araucária farm, 310 of which are arable, for a total
sale price of R$10.3 million, equivalent to 48,000 soybean bags, and on June 27, 2014, we sold 1,164 hectares of our Araucária
Farm, 913 of which are arable, for a total purchase price of R$41.3 million, equivalent to 735,000 soybean bags. After the sales,
the area of Araucária farm held by us was 5,534 hectares, of which approximately 4,051 hectares are arable.
The 2009/2010 crop
year marked the beginning of our obligations under our supply contract with Brenco to supply the entirety of our sugarcane production
from the Araucária farm to them for a term of two complete crop cycles (six crop years and five harvests), which is expected
to end in 2020.
Chaparral Farm:
As of June 30, 2020, the Chaparral farm had an area of 37,182 hectares. The Chaparral farm was acquired by our subsidiary Imobiliária
Cajueiro in November 2007 for R$47.9 million. The deed was granted on September 29, 2008 and was registered on December 12, 2008.
The property is located in the Municipality of Correntina, State of Bahia.
During the planting
season for our 2019/2020 crop year, we planted 9.552 hectares of soybean, 1,713 hectares of cotton, 301 hectares of second bean
crop, 3,085 hectares of pasture and 4,598 hectares of others cultures at the Chaparral farm.
Nova Buriti Farm:
As of June 30, 2020, the Nova Buriti farm had an area of 24,212 hectares. The Nova Buriti farm was acquired in December 2007 for
the total amount of R$22.0 million. The transfer of 3,064 hectares was made in May 2010 to our subsidiary Imobiliária Flamboyant
Ltda. and the remaining 21,147 hectares was transferred to us in August 2017, upon the payment of the balance of the price of the
amount of R$12.8 million, with the exclusion of the monetary correction as negotiated with the seller. Our subsidiary Imobiliária
Flamboyant Ltda. holds a 13% interest in the property, and we hold the remaining 87%. The property is located in the municipality
of Bonito de Minas and Cônego Marinho, State of Minas Gerais in the Southeastern region of Brazil, which is in close proximity
to major iron producers who utilize large quantities of biofuel, especially from eucalyptus wood, to generate electricity.
We are currently in
the process of obtaining the necessary permits in order to begin operations. Due to the difficulties we have been facing in regard
to obtaining licenses for the farm, we are studying alternatives for the property. One such option is to sell the farm to offset
the legal reserve, a mechanism contemplated in the environmental code pursuant to which holders of a legal reserve deficit can
acquire another area to solve certain issues.
Preferência
Farm: As of June 30, 2020, the Preferência farm had an area of 17,799 hectares. The Preferência farm was acquired
in September 2008 by our subsidiary Imobiliária Cajueiro for R$9.6 million. The deed was granted on September 4, 2009, and
registration was made on February 24, 2010. The property is located in the Municipality of Barreiras, State of Bahia. We use the
property for cattle raising and grain cultivation.
As of June 30, 2020,
we had 6,344 hectares of active pasture at our Preferência farm.
Partnership II:
On October 11, 2013, we entered into a rural partnership agreement with respect to Partnership II farm for up to 11 harvests, which
is expected to end in June 2024. The Partnership II farm is located in the municipality of Ribeiro Gonçalves, in the state
of Piauí, which has had excellent grain production results. We operate an area up to 7,500 hectares, which is suitable for
grain crops. During the planting season for our 2019/2020 crop year, we planted 7,608 hectares of grains at the Partnership II
farm.
Partnership III:
On May 8, 2015, we entered into a rural partnership agreement with respect to a property located in the municipalities of Alto
Taquari and Alto Araguaia, in the state of Mato Grosso (“Partnership III”), pursuant to which we have the right to
operate an area of up to 5,624 hectares until March 31, 2026. The properties are close to the Alto Taquari Farm, a region that
has had excellent sugarcane production results. This transaction allows us to make use of the operational structure and team already
present in the region and ensure greater property management flexibility.
Partnership IV:
On January 11, 2017, we entered into a rural partnership agreement with respect to a property located in the municipalities of
São Raimundo das Mangabeiras, in the state of Maranhão (“Partnership IV”), pursuant to which we have
the right to operate an area of up to 15,000 hectares. The agricultural partnership is already planted mostly with sugarcane and
has a term of 15 years, renewable for another 15 years.
Partnership V:
On August 28, 2018, we entered into a rural partnership agreement with respect to a property located in São Felix do Araguaia,
in the state of Mato Grosso (“Partnership V”), pursuant to which we have the right to operate an area of up to 20,138
hectares for up to 10 years. These areas are mature, with more than five years under production and are suitable for a second crop.
During the planting
season for our 2019/2020 crop year, we planted 37,625 hectares of grains (crop and second crop) at the Partnership V farm.
Serra Grande
and Partnership VII: In April 2020, we acquired the Serra Grande farm located in Baixa Grande do Ribeiro, in the
State of Piauí. The acquisition consisted of an area of 4,489 hectares, 2,904 hectares of which are arable to be developed
and are suitable for grains cultivation. The other 1,585 hectares are permanent preservation and legal reserve areas. The acquisition
price was R$25.0 million, or R$8,600 per arable hectare. We made an initial payment of R$10.7 million and will make remaining payments
in three equal annual installments.
In addition to the
acquisition, the Company has an agricultural partnership in an area of 5,473 hectares of arable and developed land, already planted
and operated by the Company during the 19/20 harvest (Partnership VII). This area is contiguous to the acquired area, has more
than 5 years in average of production and high production potential. Partnership VII has a term up to 12 years, with a call option
until 2024.
Cresca: Cresca
is a company that invests in agricultural and cattle raising land in Paraguay. On December 12, 2013, we entered into an agreement
with Cresud, our controlling shareholder, for: (i) the acquisition of its interest in Cresca S.A., representing a 50% interest
of the company, (ii) the assumption of Cresud credits with Cresca, and (iii) the execution of an advisory service agreement, pursuant
to which Cresud agreed to render services to Cresca in exchange for the payment of fees. The total consideration of the transaction
was US$19.8 million.
On the purchase date,
Cresca had approximately 81,000 hectares and had a contract for the right to purchase approximately 61,000 additional hectares
of agricultural land in the region of Mariscal Estigarribia in Paraguay. Pursuant to this agreement, Cresca purchased 35,864 hectares
on July 9, 2014, and the remaining 24,753 hectares on January 20, 2015.
On April 4, 2014, Cresca
sold 24,624 hectares in Paraguay, 12,312 of which are arable, for a total price of US$14.8 million (US$600 per hectare). The purchaser
made an initial payment of US$1.9 million and paid the first installment in the amount of US$4.3 million upon the execution of
the property transfer deed and the sold area possession transfer. The purchaser made payments totaling the amount of US$3.7 million
in 2015 and a final payment of US$4.9 million on July 20, 2016.
On October 5, 2016,
we entered into an agreement with Carlos Casado, our partner in Cresca at the time, pursuant to which we agreed to try to
sell all the land that Cresca owned for a 120-day period as of the execution date of the aforementioned agreement. Further to the
provisions of the agreement, we and Carlos Casado also agreed to split ownership of the land among us and Carlos Casado if either
party failed to dispose of the totality of the land within the 120-day period.
As the properties were
not sold to third-parties, on June 6 and June 8, 2017, we and Carlos Casado decided to proceed with the re-distribution of assets
and liabilities of Cresca, whereby we would separate and divide the assets and liabilities of Cresca, and Cresca would re-distribute
them to us and to Carlos Casado. As a result of this transaction, we now have the following two subsidiaries that received Cresca’s
assets and liabilities: (i) Palmeiras, which was incorporated to operate the activities of the Company’s investment in Cresca
and (ii) Moroti, a subsidiary that received, on February 9, 2018, upon conclusion of the process, all other assets and liabilities
of Cresca attributed to BrasilAgro, including land and debts.
On February 9, 2018,
the re-distribution of assets and liabilities of Cresca was concluded and the portion of assets and liabilities attributed to the
Company was transferred to the wholly-owned subsidiary Moroti.
As part of the re-distribution
of assets and liabilities, the Company and Carlos Casado, partners in the joint venture, decided to waive the interest for late
payment on the intercompany loans taken by Cresca in the total amount of R$32.9 million, of which BrasilAgro’s share was
R$16.6 million. See Note 1.6 to our financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020.
As of June 30, 2020,
Moroti owned 59,585 hectares of which 34,673 were arable. During the planting season for our 2019/2020 crop year, we planted 6,286
hectares of soybean, 2,196 hectares of corn, 3,167 hectares of other grains and 3,064 hectares of pasture at the farm in Paraguay.
Arrojadinho Farm:
On November 22, 2019, we entered into a Merger Agreement with Agrifirma Holding. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement,
Agrifima Holding would be merged into us and we would receive all of its assets, rights and obligations, holding 100% of the equity
capital of the subsidiary Agrifirma Agro Ltda. and its subsidiaries, in exchange for common shares and Agrifirma Warrants issued
by BrasilAgro to the selling shareholders of Agrifirma Holding.
Agrifirma and its subsidiaries
are engaged in the production, manufacture, storage and trading of agricultural products and the provision of agricultural services,
as well as the management and commercial exploration of the properties that it owns. Since Agrifirma is engaged in operations in
the same sector as BrasilAgro, we expect the following impacts immediately after the merger: operational, financial and commercial
benefits, such as dilution of general and administrative expenses, capture of synergies and economies of scale in the operations
and potential appreciation of undeveloped areas.
Agrifirma is comprised
of its parent company (Agrifirma Agro Ltda.) and four subsidiaries, namely Agrifirma Bahia Agropecuária Ltda., I. A. Agro
Ltda., GL Agropecuária Empreendimentos e Participações Ltda. and Agrifirma S.R.L.
The completion of the
Merger was subject to certain requirements and conditions precedent, which were met on January 27, 2020, following which BrasilAgro
obtained control of Agrifirma. The Merger was accounted for pursuant to IFRS 3 – Business Combinations. Please see Note
1.1 to the financial statements included in this annual report.
Following the Merger,
we added 28,930 hectares to our property portfolio, of which 16,642 hectares are on the Arrojadinho Farm, located in Jaborandi,
in the State of Bahia. The Arrojadinho farm is suitable for grain production and cattle raising.
During the planting
season for our 2019/2020 crop year, we planted 3,760 hectares of grains at the Arrojadinho farm.
Rio do Meio Farm:
On November 22, 2019, we entered into a Merger Agreement with Agrifirma Holding. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, Agrifima
Holding would be merged into us and we would receive all of its assets, rights and obligations, holding 100% of the equity capital
of the subsidiary Agrifirma Agro Ltda. and its subsidiaries, in exchange for common shares and Agrifirma Warrants issued by BrasilAgro
to the selling shareholders of Agrifirma Holding.
Agrifirma and its subsidiaries
are engaged in the production, manufacture, storage and trading of agricultural products and the provision of agricultural services,
as well as the management and commercial exploration of the properties that it owns. Since Agrifirma is engaged in operations in
the same sector as BrasilAgro, we expect the following impacts immediately after the merger: operational, financial and commercial
benefits, such as dilution of general and administrative expenses, capture of synergies and economies of scale in the operations
and potential appreciation of undeveloped areas.
Agrifirma is comprised
of its parent company (Agrifirma Agro Ltda.) and four subsidiaries, namely Agrifirma Bahia Agropecuária Ltda., I. A. Agro
Ltda., GL Agropecuária Empreendimentos e Participações Ltda. and Agrifirma S.R.L.
The completion of the
Merger was subject to certain requirements and conditions precedent, which were met on January 27, 2020, following which BrasilAgro
obtained control of Agrifirma.
Following the Merger,
we added 28,930 hectares to our property portfolio, of which 12,288 hectares are on the Rio do Meio Farm, located in Jaborandi,
in the State of Bahia. The Rio do Meio farm is suitable for grain production and cattle raising.
During the planting
season for our 2019/2020 crop year, we leased 8,043 hectares of the Rio do Meio farm to third parties.
Investment in Brenco –
Companhia Brasileira de Energia Renovável
In March 2007, we acquired
an indirect minority interest in Brenco, controlled by Odebrecht S.A., through our 40.65% investment in Green Ethanol LLC (previously
known as Tarpon All Equities Fund LLC), which we acquired for a purchase price of US$2.5 million. Green Ethanol LLC held 2.47%
of the capital stock of Brenco, including 7,600,000 warrants issued by Brenco. In March 2008, we signed contracts for the exclusive
supply to Brenco of the entirety of our sugarcane production over two full crop cycles. See “Item 4—Information On
the Company—Material Agreements.”
In September 2008,
Green Ethanol LLC decreased its shareholding in Brenco to 1.55% of Brenco’s capital stock, which percentage was subsequently
increased to 3.80% in December 2008. In February 2010, ETH Bioenergia acquired substantially all of the capital stock of Brenco,
thereby diluting our indirect ownership interest (held through Green Ethanol LLC) to 0.05% of Brenco’s capital stock as of
December 31, 2010. As a result of the losses incurred by Brenco and of the significant level of debt, we carried out an impairment
analysis of our investment interest in Brenco. As a result of such assessment, we recorded an impairment loss on our investment
of R$6.6 million as of July 1, 2009.
Commodity Futures Contracts
We enter into sales
contracts for the future sale and physical delivery of our agricultural commodities to international import/export companies. Such
contracts are primarily with respect to soybean, but also include sugarcane in connection with our exclusive supply agreement with
Brenco. In the case of soybean, we may contract a fixed price for all or part of the volume to be delivered. The price is determined
according to a contractual formula based on the soybean quotation at the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT). The price established in
U.S. dollars is paid at the end of the commitment period, in reais, according to contractually defined exchange rates prevailing
a few days before settlement. The terms of the agreements subject us to fines in the event that we fail to deliver the previously-committed
volumes to the purchaser.
Material Agreements
Agrifirma
On November 22, 2019,
we entered into a Merger Agreement with Agrifirma Holding. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, Agrifima Holding would be merged
into us and we would receive all of its assets, rights and obligations, holding 100% of the equity capital of the subsidiary Agrifirma
Agro Ltda. and its subsidiaries, in exchange for common shares and Agrifirma Warrants issued by BrasilAgro to the selling shareholders
of Agrifirma Holding.
Agrifirma and its subsidiaries
are engaged in the production, manufacture, storage and trading of agricultural products and the provision of agricultural services,
as well as the management and commercial exploration of the properties that it owns. Since Agrifirma is engaged in operations in
the same sector as BrasilAgro, we expect the following impacts immediately after the merger: operational, financial and commercial
benefits, such as dilution of general and administrative expenses, capture of synergies and economies of scale in the operations
and potential appreciation of undeveloped areas.
Agrifirma is comprised
of its parent company (Agrifirma Agro Ltda.) and four subsidiaries, namely Agrifirma Bahia Agropecuária Ltda., I. A. Agro
Ltda., GL Agropecuária Empreendimentos e Participações Ltda. and Agrifirma S.R.L.
The completion of the
Merger was subject to certain requirements and conditions precedent, which were met on January 27, 2020, following which BrasilAgro
obtained control of Agrifirma.
Based on the terms
of the Merger Agreement, the consideration transferred in the form of shares was determined based on an initial exchange ratio
(preliminary numbers), final exchange ratio (adjustment to exchange ratio) and adjustments due to indemnifications. The Merger
Agreement also sets forth the minimum number of shares to be transferred at 5,392,872.
The parties agreed
to define a first exchange ratio based on preliminary book values as of June 30, 2019, adjusted for the market value of the real
state held by BrasilAgro and Agrifirma Holding, according to an appraisal report issued by a specialized third party. In addition,
part of the consideration was agreed to be issued by us in the form of subscription warrants. As a result, the number of shares
and warrants to be issued to the shareholders of Agrifirma was set at 5,215,385 shares and 654,487 warrants.
Pursuant to the Merger
Agreement, the initial exchange ratio was adjusted to reflect the changes in the assets described above on the preliminary balance
sheet as of June 30, 2019 through the acquisition date, on January 27, 2020, which was the date of the consummation of the Merger
Agreement.
On April 1, 2020, BrasilAgro
notified the former shareholders of Agrifirma Holding that the final exchange ratio, based on the changes in net equity from June
30, 2019 to January 27, 2020, was determined and reached the minimum number established in the merger agreement, totaling 5,392,872
shares as the final consideration to be paid by Brasilagro.
The Merger Agreement
also sets forth certain obligations for the payment of compensation by BrasilAgro and the selling shareholders of Agrifirma if
certain contractually indemnifiable losses occur within two years from the date of the Merger Agreement.
On June 18, 2020, BrasilAgro
and the selling shareholders of Agrifirma signed a settlement agreement, pursuant to which the final exchange ratio was agreed
at the minimum number of shares, totaling 5,392,872 shares. The parties also agreed that, given the resolution of a contingency
by the date of the settlement agreement, the selling shareholders of Agrifirma agreed to return the amount of R$3,500,000 in restricted
shares and Agrifirma Warrants on January 27, 2022, which were calculated using the market price of Brasilagro’s average share
price during the 90 days prior to the settlement date.
The unrestricted shares
issued for the consideration transferred for the acquisition of control of Agrifirma are recognized in equity. The restricted shares,
the Agrifirma Warrants and the Agrifirma Warrant dividends are recorded under “other liabilities” in the statement
of financial position as their final amount may vary due to certain conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement and, for such
reason, do not meet the definition of equity instrument in accordance with IAS 32 – Financial Instruments, and therefore
are recognized as financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss. The restricted shares are considered in the calculation
of basic earnings per share, while the Agrifirma Warrants are considered potential common shares and as such included in the calculation
of diluted earnings per share. See Note 1.1 to the financial statements included in this annual report.
Serra Grande Farm Acquisition and
Partnership VII
In April 2020, we acquired
the Serra Grande farm located in Baixa Grande do Ribeiro, in the State of Piauí. The acquisition consisted of an area of
4,489 hectares, 2,904 hectares of which are arable to be developed and are suitable for grains cultivation. The other 1,585 hectares
are permanent preservation and legal reserve areas. The acquisition price was R$25.0 million, or R$8,600 per arable hectare. We
made an initial payment of R$10.7 million and will make remaining payments in three equal annual installments.
In addition to the
acquisition, the Company has an agricultural partnership in an area of 5,473 hectares of arable and developed land, already planted
and operated by the Company during the 19/20 harvest (Partnership VII). This area is contiguous to the acquired area, has more
than 5 years in average of production and high production potential. Partnership VII has a term up to 12 years, with a pre-fixed
call option until 2024.
Partnership V (3SB Produtos Agrícolas
S.A.)
On July 11, 2018, we
entered into an agricultural rural partnership agreement with 3SB Produtos Agrícolas S.A. (“Brasilagro/3SB Partnership
Agreement”), which was amended on August 28, 2018. The scope of 3SB Partnership Agreement involved a total of 11 rural properties,
all located in the Municipality of São Felix do Araguaia, in the State of Mato Grosso, comprising a total agricultural area
of 23,615 useful hectares. 3SB Produtos Agrícolas S.A. holds the rural properties under the Brasilagro/3SB Partnership Agreement
by reason of rural lease agreements that it had previously entered into with the owners of such properties. For this reason, the
term of the Brasilagro/3SB Partnership Agreement varies from property to property, according to the term of each rural lease agreement
entered into with each the owners. On June 1, 2019, the total agricultural area of the Brasilagro/3SB Partnership Agreement was
reduced by 3,242 useful hectares. On June 13, 2019, we entered into a new rural lease agreement with the owner of Fazenda Santa
Luzia and Fazenda Jataí II (following the expiration of the rural lease agreements orignially entered into with 3SB Produtos
Agrícolas S.A.). Considering both the Brasilagro/3SB Partnership Agreement and the agreements that we entered into with
the owner of Fazenda Santa Luzia and Fazenda Jataí II, the total agricultural area currently occupied by us in São
Felix do Araguaia, in the State of Mato Grosso, is 20,138 hectares.
Partnership IV (Agro Serra –
Agro Pecuária e Industrial Serra Grande Ltda.)
On February 7, 2017,
we entered into two agreements for an agricultural partnership in relation to a property in São Raimundo das Mangabeiras,
state of Maranhão, or Partnership IV.
The first agreement
under Partnership IV establishes an agricultural partnership with Agro Pecuária e Industrial Serra Grande Ltda. (“Serra
Grande”), which consists of a sugarcane exploration agreement of an area of around 15,000 hectares. The agricultural partnership
will last for 15 years from the date of the agreement and may be extended for the same period. The amount to be paid to Serra Grande
corresponds to 10% of the entire production obtained in the area referred to in the agreement and the initial volume to be produced
in the area during the first year of the agreement was established at 850,000 tons. After this period, spanning between one and
five years, the minimum volume to be produced in the partnership areas is 4,500,000 tons of sugarcane, and from the sixth year
onward until the expiration of the agreement, the minimum production volume is 1,250,000 tons of sugarcane per crop year.
The second agreement
under Partnership IV governs the rights and obligations of the agricultural partners, through which BrasilAgro acquired sugarcane
crops planted by the agricultural partner in the areas referred to in the partnership agreement described above. This agreement
meets the definition of a finance lease. As consideration, BrasilAgro undertakes to return, at the end of the agreement, the area
referred to in the partnership agreement together with sugarcane stubble crops with the capacity to produce 850,000 tons of sugarcane
in the crop year subsequent to the termination of the agricultural partnership agreement.
Brenco – Companhia Brasileira
de Energia Renovável
In March 2008, we signed
two contracts for the exclusive supply to Brenco of the entirety of our sugarcane production over two full crop cycles (for sugarcane,
one full crop cycle consists of six agricultural years and five harvests). They are expected to expire in 2020, but are renewable
upon the agreement of the parties. One of the contracts refers to our cultivation from an area of approximately 5,718 hectares
at our Araucária farm and the other refers to approximately 3,669 hectares at our Alto Taquari farm. The price per ton,
for the purpose of these agreements, is determined based on Total Recoverable Sugar, or ATR, price per ton of sugarcane effectively
delivered, with ATR corresponding to the quantity of sugar available in the raw material, minus sugar content lost during the production
process, multiplied by the market prices of sugar and ethanol sold by regional plants in the internal and external market, in each
case, as determined by the Counsel of Sugarcane, Sugar and Alcohol Producers in São Paulo (Conselho de Produtores de
Cana, Açúcar e Álcool de São Paulo, or CONSECANA). For the year ended June 30, 2020, net revenue
of our sugarcane production to Brenco was R$82.8 million, representing 16.9% of our total net revenue. The purpose of the contracts
is not to secure a more favorable price than the market price, since we expect that the ATR price as determined by CONSECANA will
be generally equivalent to the market price, but rather to secure the sale of our sugarcane production over the long term. We believe
this gives us the predictability that makes it practicable for us to grow and commercialize sugarcane, given that sugarcane crops
have a productive cycle lasting six years from the first harvest. However, Brenco is facing financial difficulties and may not
comply with its contractual obligations.
On May 8, 2015, we executed three
agreements with Brenco:
The first agreement
consists of a rural sub partnership to operate nine farms located in the municipalities of Alto Araguaia and Alto Taquari, in the
state of Mato Grosso. The sub partnership started at the date of its signature and is estimated to end on March 31, 2026. The areas
are to be used for the plantation and cultivation of sugarcane, which cannot exceed the duration of the contract. This contractual
partnership meets the definition of an operating lease. The payment must always be in kind (tons of sugarcane) and delivered at
the mill owned by Brenco, which is located in the vicinity of the farms, during the harvest period of the product. The quantity
to be paid for the duration of the contract shall be established in tons per hectare and varies according to the area being explored.
According to this contract, the quantity to be paid in the long term corresponds to 529,975 tons of sugarcane, of which 174,929
tons will be paid within one to five years and 355,046 tons will be paid after more than five years up to the expiration of the
agreement.
The second agreement
relates to the regulation of rights and obligations between agricultural partners from whom BrasilAgro acquired the crops of sugarcane
planted by Brenco in the properties subject to the sub partnership agreement described above. This contract meets the definition
of a financial leasing. The payment must always be in kind (tons of sugarcane) and delivered at the mill owned by Brenco during
the harvest period of the product. According to this contract, the quantity to be paid in the long term corresponds to 53,845 tons
of sugarcane, of which 18,604 tons will be paid within one year and 35,241 tons will be paid within one to five years.
In the year ended June
30, 2020, we delivered a total of 840.6 million tons of sugarcane pursuant to the agreements described above.
The third agreement
regulates the exclusive supply to Brenco of the total sugarcane production in the properties included in the sub partnership agreement
for two crop cycles, one cycle shall be effective until the depletion of the already existing sugarcane crops and the other cycle
consists of the sugarcane being planted by BrasilAgro.
In the year ended June
30, 2020 and as of the date hereof, Brenco has not defaulted on the payment of any receivable. However, we currently run the risk
of default by Brenco, our main customer, associated with the fact that its controlling shareholder, Odebrecht S.A., is being investigated
for corruption in the operation called “Lava Jato” (Car Wash) and the fact that Brenco filed for reorganization bankruptcy
in Brazil (recuperação judicial) in May 2019. Odebrecht’s CEO has been arrested and the company has
been facing the following issues: difficulties to access the credit market, decrease in its business activities, early maturity
of debts, among others. Therefore, Brenco’ controlling shareholder has been cutting costs, which can adversely affect Brenco,
its business and its ability to meet its payments due to us.
Cresca
On October 5, 2016,
we entered into an agreement with Carlos Casado, our partner in Cresca at the time, pursuant to which we agreed to try to
sell all the land that Cresca owned for a 120-day period as of the execution date of the aforementioned agreement. Further to the
provisions of the agreement, we and Carlos Casado also agreed to split ownership of the land among us and Carlos Casado if either
party failed to dispose of the totality of the land within the 120-day period.
As the properties were
not sold to third-parties, on June 6 and June 8, 2017, we and Carlos Casado decided to proceed with the re-distribution of assets
and liabilities of Cresca, whereby we would separate and divide the assets and liabilities of Cresca, and Cresca would distribute
them to us and to Carlos Casado.
As a result of this
transaction, we now have the following two subsidiaries that received Cresca’s assets and liabilities: (i) Palmeiras, which
was incorporated to operate the activities of our investment in Cresca and (ii) Moroti, a subsidiary that has received, on February
9, 2018, upon conclusion of the process, all other assets and liabilities of Cresca attributed to BrasilAgro, including land and
debts.
On February 9, 2018,
the re-distribution of assets and liabilities of Cresca was concluded and the portion of assets and liabilities attributed to the
Company was transferred to the wholly-owned subsidiary Moroti.
As part of the re-distribution
of assets and liabilities, the Company and Carlos Casado, partners in the joint venture, decided to waive the interest for late
payment on the intercompany loans taken by Cresca in the total amount of R$32.9 million, of which BrasilAgro’s share was
R$16.6 million. See Note 1.6 to our financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020.
As of June 30, 2020,
Moroti owned 59,585 hectares of which 34,673 were arable. During the planting season for our 2019/2020 crop year, we planted 6,286
hectares of soybean, 2,196 hectares of corn, 3,167 hectares of other grains and 3,064 hectares of pasture at the farm in Paraguay.
Raw Material Acquisition Risks
For the acquisition
of farming inputs, our primary risks are foreign-exchange variations, the supply and demand of each input, farming commodity prices
and freight prices. Our dependence on imported raw materials is also subject to supply and customs clearance delays. We are also
subject to risks regarding the availability of the specific varieties of seeds we use, which are affected by weather conditions,
among other factors.
In addition, the price
of diesel fuel, which is the primary fuel used in farming machinery and trucks, is affected by the variation in oil prices as well
as by the price-control policies adopted by the Brazilian government.
See “Item 3—Key
Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to our Business and Industry” for information regarding the prohibition
of the use of glyphosate and the freight rate schedule.
Customers
We currently sell a
substantial portion of our total crop production to a small number of customers who have substantial bargaining power. In the year
ended June 30, 2020, our three largest customers, Agro Serra, Brenco and Bunge, accounted for 60.0% of our total revenue. See “Item
3—Key Information—Risk Factors— Substantially all of our revenue is derived from a small number of customers,
and we currently face a risk of default by our main customer.”
We did not and do not
expect to renegotiate the terms of our agreements with our customers, such as extended payment terms or refund periods, or provide
concessions or modify terms of arrangements and did not and do not expect to modify other contractual arrangements as a result
of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Competition
The agriculture industry
is composed of widely traded commodities, where the prices are freely determined based on supply and demand. The supply side is
characterized by a large number of producers, each contributing a small part of the total production and thus having minimal influence
over commodity prices, which are generally determined by indexes or exchanges in international markets, as is the case with soybean,
the price of which is largely determined by the CBOT. Agricultural commodity producers therefore compete largely based on their
production costs, and their scale of production. At the domestic level, producers compete on similar conditions, whereas at the
international level, competition is affected significantly by, among other factors, government policies such as subsidies to agricultural
producers, which can be substantial in developed countries.
Land acquisition is
subject to intense competition. In this case, we compete to acquire the most appropriate land for cultivating our agricultural
products. We believe that this process has contributed to an increase in land prices over the years and that the strongest competition
has been from the larger groups having in-depth knowledge of the sector, management excellence and continuous objectives to increase
their agricultural area portfolio. We understand that these large groups are mainly SLC Participações, operating
in four Brazilian states; and Terra Santa Agro. In addition, we may face significant competition from large international companies
which have greater financial resources than we do.
Seasonality
Our principal products
are subject to seasonality variations between the crop season and the off-season. The off-season occurs between the end of the
harvest of a crop year and the beginning of the harvest of the following crop year. Such period occurs at different parts of the
year depending on the agricultural product, as follows: (i) the off-season for grains in Brazil typically occurs between August
and January; (ii) the off-season for sugarcane in Brazil typically occurs between December and March; and (iii) the off-season
for cattle-raising in Brazil typically occurs between September and January. Because of the reduced supply of agricultural products
during each product’s respective off-season, prices for such products are typically higher during that time.
Throughout the year,
our working capital needs vary significantly depending on the harvest period of grains, sugarcane and other crops in Brazil. Changes
in the harvest periods, resulting from unfavorable weather or financial restrictions on us, have a direct impact on our inventory
levels, advances to producers, loans and sales volume during the year.
Insurance
Our businesses are
generally subject to a number of risks and hazards, which could result in damage to individuals, or destruction of properties,
facilities and equipment. As a general rule, we believe that our insurance coverage against risks that are typical in our business
is adequate and consistent with the usual practices adopted by other companies operating in the same sector in Brazil. Nevertheless,
we cannot ensure that the coverage set forth in our insurance policies will suffice for purposes of protecting us from all losses
and damages that may occur.
We have a civil liability
insurance policy that covers liability arising from compensation for damages caused to third parties in an amount of up to R$5
million. This policy is currently in force and will expire on November 19, 2020. We are negotiating with the insurance company
to extend this policy.
We also have a business
insurance policy (rural multi-risk) for storage structure (silo) and machinery located at our Chaparral farm located in
Correntina, in the State of Bahia. This policy provides for different maximum indemnity coverage, depending on the insured event,
such as lightning, explosion, electrical damages or windstorm. This policy is currently in force and will expire on April 2, 2021.
We have also a Directors
and Officers (D&O) insurance policy, which covers the members of our board of directors, executive board, audit board or other
body created by our bylaws or employees that hold a management position to which they have been elected or appointed, provided
that such election or appointment has been ratified by competent bodies, as applicable, and that the indemnification shall always
be subject to the limits provided in the respective insurance policy. Consultants, external auditors, shareholders, partners, interveners,
depositaries or liquidators of the Company are not covered by this D&O insurance policy. This insurance policy covers civil
liability up to R$20 million, and environmental damages up to R$20 million. This policy is currently in force and will expire on
January 3, 2021.
We have an insurance
policy that covers certain specific machinery (harvesters and planters), as well as the irrigation pivot system at our São
José farm.
We also have an insurance
policy that covers our headquarters office for fire, lighting and explosion events, as well as electric damage. This policy is
currently in force and will expire on April 27, 2021.
Intellectual Property
In Brazil, title to
a patent or trademark is obtained by means of the registration with the National Institute of Industrial Property (Instituto Nacional
de Propriedade Industrial, or INPI). When such right is granted, the titleholder is ensured the exclusive use right thereof all
over Brazil for a period of ten years, which may be renewed for successive equal periods indefinitely, as long as there is an interest
in maintaining the trademark ownership.
Pursuant to the Brazilian
legal framework, a trademark can be categorized as either a product, service, certification or collective mark. With regard to
its presentation in local law, the trademarks can be nominative, mixed, figurative or three-dimensional. During the registration
process, the depositor has an expectation of right to use the deposited trademarks, which he may avail himself from in order to
identify its products or services until the registration process is ultimately concluded.
We have filed three
trademark registration applications with the INPI for the trademark name (which corresponds to our current corporate name) “BrasilAgro
– Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas” under Nos. 828045089, 828045097 and 828045100.
Registration No. 828045089
concerning intermediation, purchase, sale or lease of properties, land, buildings and real estate in rural and urban areas, intermediation
in real estate transactions of any kind, as well as participation in other companies, in undertakings in Brazil and abroad was
granted to us by the INPI on June 2, 2020 and will expire on June 2, 2026. Registration No. 828045097 concerning marketing, distribution,
importation and export of agricultural and livestock products was granted to us by the INPI on June 5, 2012 and will expire on
June 5, 2022. Registration No. 828045100 concerning products related to agriculture and livestock, such as agricultural products,
vegetables, forestry, grains and animals, fruits, vegetables, seeds, plants and natural flowers and animal feed was granted to
us by the INPI on September 20, 2016 and will expire on September 20, 2026.
We also have filed
three trademark registration applications for the trademark name “BrasilAgro – Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades
Agropecuárias,” under applications No. 827971575, 827971567 and 827971583. Registration No. 827971567 was approved
on April 7, 2020 and will expire on April, 7, 2030. Reistration Nos. 827971575 and 827971583 were approved on June 14, 2011 and
January 28, 2014, respectively, and will expire on June 14, 2021 and January 28, 2024, respectively.
In addition, we filed
three trademark registration applications for the single name “BrasilAgro.” The first one, filed at INPI under No.
829541870 is a service trademark, refers to NCL (9) 35 - marketing, distribution, importation and export of agricultural and livestock
products, was approved on November 1, 2011 and expires on November 1, 2021. The second one, filed under No. 829541853, refers to
a product trademark, on NCL 31, involving products related to agriculture and livestock, such as agricultural products, vegetables,
forestry, grains and animals, fruits, vegetables and fresh vegetables, seeds, plants and natural flowers, animal food and malt,
was approved on September 20, 2016 and remains in force until September 20, 2026. Finally, the third trademark registration application
for the name “BrasilAgro” had the analysis thereof postponed by means of a decision dated June 28, 2011 and is currently
halted given that it is pending of evaluation of another prior trademark registration application by the INPI.
Following the Merger
of Agrifirma, we also became the title owner of the following trademarks: (i) Registration No. 830154647, concerning the participation
in other companies as a partner or shareholder, purchase and sale of real estate, and management of real estate, which was renewed
as from February 8, 2021 and will expire on February 8, 2031; (ii) Registration No 830154566, concerning coffee and cotton processing
services, which was registered on November 29, 2016 and will expire on November 29, 2026; (iii) Registration No 830154620, concerning
harvesting services (agricultural services), services of advice, consultancy and information on research in the field of agriculture,
which was renewed as from February 8, 2021 and will expire on February 8, 2031; (iv) Registration No. 830154663, concerning buying,
selling, importing, exporting and commercialization of products related to agriculture, livestock and reforestation, such as coffee,
cotton, soy, corn, firewood, cattle and their derivatives, such as meat and milk, which was registered on February 14, 2012 and
will expire on February 8, 2031; and (v) Registration No. 830154582, concerning transport and storage services, which was renewed
as from February 8, 2021 and will expire on February 8, 2031.
Risk Management
We analyze and monitor
the various risks to which our business and operations are exposed. In addition to monitoring the specific factors that directly
affect our agricultural production and business operations, we also monitor the risks derived from commodity price variations for
our individual agricultural products, as well as foreign-exchange variations. Through our risk management policy coordinated among
our Strategic Planning department, Risk Management Committee and board of directors, we hedge our exposure to commodity price risks
for our transactions through over-the-counter instruments including options and futures contracts negotiated in the commodity market
and maintain our exposures within pre-established limits.
Cash Management
To the extent we are
unable or decide not to deploy our capital through agricultural property acquisitions or other investments, we maintain any uninvested
cash and cash equivalents in an investment fund, which holds investments in fixed income securities in short-term, liquid investments
(such as bank certificates of deposit, government securities and other cash-equivalents).
Regulation
In addition to the
descriptions of regulatory matters set forth below, see the description of certain legal proceedings, including judicial and administrative
proceedings relating to regulatory matters, set forth in “Item 8—Financial Information—Legal Proceedings.”
Environmental Regulation
The development of
our agribusiness activities depends on a number of federal, state and municipal laws and regulations related to environmental protection.
We may be subject to criminal and administrative penalties, besides being obligated to restore the environment and reimburse third
parties for possible damages arising from non-compliance with such laws and regulations.
Administrative Liability
Administrative liability
derives from an action or omission that results in violation of the standards of preservation, protection or restoration of the
environment. Federal Decree No. 6,514 of July 22, 2008 establishes a set of sanctions that may be imposed as a result of breach
of environmental regulation. Such sanctions include warning, fine, destruction of the product, suspension of activities, termination
of tax benefits and credit lines granted by public institutions. Fines are determined based on the relevance and economic impact
of the breach and can reach R$50.0 million. See “Item 3—Key Information—Risk Factors.”
Civil Liability
Under civil law, the
offender is strictly liable for any environmental damage and subject to an objective standard of care, which creates liability
regardless of negligence by the offender. Consequently, we are jointly liable with any third parties providing services for us
to the extent their activities cause environmental damage. Environmental regulation also permits the regulator to recover damages
from the controlling entity through the chain of share ownership if the direct offender is unable to pay the related damage.
Criminal Liability
Our officers, directors,
employees and agents who engage in environmental crimes are subject to criminal sanctions, including fines, prison sentences and
the imposition of community service requirements.
Environmental Licenses
Environmental licensing
is required for activities utilizing environmental resources that are considered potentially pollutant, or those that may in any
way cause environmental degradation. Some Brazilian states and Paraguay require licenses for agricultural and animal-raising activities.
The environmental licensing
procedure includes authorizations to change land use, water use licenses, licenses for agriculture and livestock activities, etc.
All of these licenses guarantee that activities are being carried out in compliance with environmental laws and their possible
impacts are being mitigated or compensated.
For the Paraguay farm,
we obtained licenses to change land use and licenses for agricultural and animal-raising activities for the remaining area.
For the Nova Buriti
farm, we carry out environmental impact studies and present them as regulatory agencies to obtain that licenses. However, we are
also considering alternative options, such as a conservation easement, apportionment of land for an environmental reserve area
and compensation for a legal reserve area.
For the Preferência
farm, we renew the authorization to change land use with the competent environmental agency.
Protected Areas
All rural properties
in Brazil are required by law to maintain legal reserve areas. A legal reserve area is an area of each rural property where deforestation
is not allowed and that is necessary for the sustainable use of natural resources, conservation and rehabilitation of ecological
processes, conservation of biodiversity and shelter and protection for native fauna and flora. These areas are required in perpetuity
and in some cases are recorded as such in the real estate registry.
It is mandatory to
maintain as legal reserve at least 80% of an agricultural property located in Floresta biome within Amazonia Legal, 35% for an
agricultural property in the savannah region within Amazonia Legal and 20% for an agricultural property located in other forms
of native vegetation in other regions of Brazil. In Paraguay, it is mandatory to maintain as legal reserve at least 25% of all
agricultural property with more than 20 hectares in forest regions and also a corridor of native vegetation of at least 100 meters
for every 100 hectares of agricultural or livestock.
All of our properties
have legal reserve areas, although a part thereof has legal reserves that are in the process of being recorded at the offices of
the applicable government agency. Additionally, environmental laws protect other areas, such as permanent preservation areas.
Permanent preservation
areas are spaces, in both public domain and private domain, where the exercise of property rights has been limited. Permanent preservation
areas include the margins of any water streams, the surroundings of headwaters and of natural water reservoirs, as well as lands
inclined more than 45º. It will only be possible to modify these areas through previous authorization by the competent state
environmental body.
In addition to these
areas, there are also areas for environmental compensation, and ecological corridors, which safeguard interconnection of fragments
of vegetation, ensuring protection of local biodiversity. Protected areas may not be suppressed, and may be used only under a regime
of sustainable forest stewardship in accordance with technical and scientific criteria set forth in applicable regulations.
As of June 30, 2020,
68,129 hectares, or approximately 32% of the total area of our properties, consist of protected areas.
Rural Environmental Register (CAR)
In Brazil, all rural
properties are required by law (Law No. 12.651/12 and Decrees Nos. 7.830/2012 and 8.235/2014) to register with the rural environmental
register (CAR). This electronic registration integrates environmental information regarding the property, deforestation control,
the monitoring and combating of forests and other forms of native vegetation, as well as environmental and economic planning of
rural properties. The CAR gathers environmental information for each property regarding the situation of permanent preservation
areas, legal reserve areas, forests and remnants of native vegetation, restricted use areas, consolidated areas, etc.
This register requires
the rural proprietary to regularize their environmental situation. It is a requirement to have access to credit, however, sanctions
are not imposed for those who are not registered with CAR.
All of our owned properties are
registered or in the process of being registered with CAR.
Ownership of Agricultural Land in Brazil
by Foreigners
On August 23, 2010,
opinion No. LA-01, of August 19, 2010, issued by the Federal Attorney General (AGU) was approved by the President of Brazil. The
opinion addresses the purchase and lease of agricultural properties by Brazilian companies controlled by foreign individuals or
legal entities holding the control of the capital stock of a company that owns land in Brazil. The Federal Attorney General’s
opinion provides that Brazilian companies controlled by non-Brazilians require prior authorization to purchase agricultural properties
and are subject to restrictions, including the following:
|
i.
|
the agricultural properties shall be used for agricultural, cattle raising or industrial activities, and shall be previously approved by the Ministry of Agrarian Development or by the Ministry of Development, Industry and Foreign Trade;
|
|
ii.
|
the total area of agricultural properties owned by foreigners shall not exceed the greater of (A) one fourth of the area of the municipality where the property is located; or (B) the sum of the areas held by foreigners of the same nationality shall not exceed 40% of the area of the municipality where the property is located; and
|
|
iii.
|
the acquisition shall not exceed 100 indefinite exploration modules, which are measurement units defined by INCRA. The MEI, which are measurement units adopted by INCRA, is subject to alterations by INCRA in case of changes in the economic conditions of a given region. Currently the size of the MEI range from five to 100 hectares, depending on the region.
|
New acquisitions or
new lease agreements of agricultural properties by companies controlled by non-Brazilians within the above-mentioned limits must
be previously approved by INCRA. The request for the approval must be filed at the Regional Branch of INCRA (Superintendência
Regional) of the State where the property is located. After that, INCRA will analyze the compliance with the above-mentioned
requirements and if the transaction is approved by INCRA, it will issue a certificate of approval. The purchase and lease of agricultural
properties beyond the limits of areas and percentages mentioned above require prior authorization from the Brazilian Congress.
In both cases, it is
not possible to determine an estimated time frame for the approval procedure, since up to the date of the issuance hereof, there
is no report involving the issuance of such a certificate. Moreover, for the time being, Brazilian courts have not yet ruled on
the effectiveness and constitutionality of the contents of the aforementioned Attorney General’s Opinion.
As of June 30, 2020,
approximately 58.44% of our common shares were held by foreigners.
On December 11, 2012,
São Paulo’s General Comptroller of Justice (Corregedoria Geral de Justiça do Estado de São Paulo)
issued Opinion No. 461/2012-E, establishing that entities providing notary and registrar services located in the State of São
Paulo are exempt from observing certain restrictions and requirements imposed by Brazilian Federal Law No. 5,709/71 and Decree
No. 74,965/74, regarding Brazilian companies with the majority of the capital stock comprised by foreigners residing outside of
Brazil or legal entities incorporated abroad. In April 2013, the Regional Federal Court for the Third Region (Tribunal Regional
Federal da 3ª Região – TRF) granted an injunction in the context of a claim brought by INCRA and the Federal
Government against São Paulo’s General Comptroller of Justice Opinion No. 461/2012-E, suspending the effects of such
opinion. In August 2013, the Regional Federal Court of the Third Region acknowledged its lack of jurisdiction to rule on such claim
and sent the court records of the case to São Paulo State Appeals Court (Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de São
Paulo). As a consequence of such decision, the injunction granted by the Regional Federal Court of the Third Region was set
aside, and both INCRA and the Federal Government had declined on the claim. Since then, entities providing notary and registry
services located in the State of São Paulo are, over again, exempt from observing certain restrictions and requirements
imposed by Law No. 5,709/71 and Decree No. 74,965/74.
On June 25, 2014, the
AGU and INCRA filed a suit with the Supreme Court (STF) against the State of São Paulo due to the decision ruled by São
Paulo State Appeals Court which judged the Opinion 1 issued by AGU in 2010, unconstitutional. In this suit the stay of the preliminary
order was required and, in the end, the definite annulment of Opinion 461-12-E of the Inspector General Office of São Paulo,
issued on December 3, 2012. On August 7, 2014, the decision issued by Supreme Court Justice Marco Aurélio Mello, rapporteur
of the process, was published, denying the injunction requested by AGU and INCRA, on the basis that the fact that more than one
year and 7 months elapsed since from the issuance of the opinion of the Inspector General Office of São Paulo and the filing
of the suit with STF, showing that there was no urgency in the analysis of the injunction request. In September 2016, Supreme Court
Justice Marco Aurélio Mello suspended the effects of said decision issued by the São Paulo Justice Court that considered
that the Opinion issued by the AGU in 2010 as unconstitutional.
In addition, on April
16, 2015, the Brazilian Rural Society filed a claim for the acknowledgment of non-compliance with basic principles (ADPF) under
certain provisions of the Brazilian Constitution with the Supreme Court in order to (i) declare that the paragraph 1 of article
1 of Law No. 5,709/1971 was not received by the 1988 Federal Constitution and (ii) reverse the opinion of the Federal Attorney
General of 2010 (Opinion No. LA-01).
As of the date hereof,
we are not able to provide an estimate of the timeframe for a final judgment in any of these lawsuits to be ruled by the STF.
|
C.
|
Organizational
Structure
|
The chart below illustrates
our corporate structure os of September 30, 2020. All of our subsidiaries are incorporated in Brazil and Paraguay.
|
(1)
|
A portion of our common shares held by Cresud are deposited with The Bank of New York Mellon in the form of ADRs (American Depositary Receipts). Includes shares held by Agro Managers, which is organized under the laws of Argentina and controlled by Cresud’s controlling shareholder (Mr. Eduardo Elsztain) and Cresud, respectively.
|
|
(2)
|
Autonomy Master Fund Limited is controlled by Autonomy Capital (Jersey) LP, and both entities are part of the group that employs Mr. Bruno Magalhães, a member of our board of directors. Certain of the shares held by Autonomy Master Fund Limited are held as hedge for total return swap transactions entered into between Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited and Autonomy Master Fund Limited. The swap transactions mature on September 27, 2021.
|
|
(3)
|
Consolidated position of the funds managed by Charles River Capital.
|
|
(4)
|
Cape Town LLC is controlled by Mr. Elie Horn.
|
|
(5)
|
Other than Mr. Eduardo Elsztain.
|
|
(6)
|
On February 9, 2018, the re-distribution of assets and liabilities of Cresca was concluded, and the portion of assets and liabilities held by us was transferred to our wholly-owned subsidiary Moroti.
|
|
D.
|
Property,
Plants and Equipment
|
See “—History
and Development of the Company—Overview,” “—Business Overview—Agricultural Activities and Products,”
“—Business Overview—Leases,” “—Business Overview—Investment Properties,” “—Business
Overview—Agricultural Properties,” “—Business Overview— Environmental Regulation” and “—Business
Overview—Environmental Licenses.”
ITEM 4A—UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
There are no unresolved
staff comments as of the date of this annual report.
ITEM 5—OPERATING AND FINANCIAL
REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
You should read the
following discussion in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere
in this report. Our audited annual consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by IASB.
The following discussion
contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, in particular with respect to the COVID-19 pandemic and
related effects on our historical and future results of operations and financial condition. See “Forward-Looking Statements”
and “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors.”
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic
In December 2019, COVID-19
surfaced in Wuhan, China. The outbreak was declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020. The speed
and extent of the spread of COVID-19, and the duration and intensity of resulting business disruption and related financial and
social impact are uncertain, and such adverse effects may be material to our business and operations.
In March 2020, we developed
and implemented a plan comprised of certain measures to protect the health of our employees, prevent the spread of COVID-19 at
our facilities and mitigate its effects on our operations. These measures included:
|
●
|
the creation of a Prevention and Risk Committee to assess the overall
situation, propose and revise preventive measures and actions to minimize risks, and coordinate the implementation of action plans;
|
|
●
|
the adoption of a remote work policy for employees who are in certain
risk groups or who work at our corporate headquarters in São Paulo;
|
|
●
|
the implementation of certain measures and protocols to protect the
safety of all persons involved in our operations, pursuant to the guidelines of the Brazilian Ministry of Health (Ministério
da Saúde); and
|
|
●
|
the adoption of contingency plans to prevent disruption in our operations.
|
All of our employees
have been able to access all of our systems and company work tools remotely. The remote work arrangements that we adopted did not
affect our ability to maintain our operations, including financial reporting systems, internal control over financial reporting
and disclosure controls and procedures.
Our operations in Brazil
and Paraguay continued normally and, to date, we have not had had any material impact on our business and operations arising out
of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there are no recent comparable events that may guide us as to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic,
and we cannot anticipate the final effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business and operations until the COVID-19 pandemic
is resolved.
See “Item 4—Information
on the Company—Business Overview—Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic,” for additional information concerning the
COVID 19 pandemic. See also “Item 3—Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to our Business and Industry—We
may be exposed to risks related to health epidemics and pandemics, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, which could adversely affect
our business and results of operations” and “—Risks Relating to Brazil—The measures taken or to be implemented
by the Brazilian government in response to the COVID-19 pandemic may have an adverse effect on our business and operations.”
Business Drivers and Measures
Brazilian Macroeconomic Environment
Our financial condition
and results of operations are influenced by the Brazilian economic environment.
Brazilian GDP decreased
3.6 % in 2016, increased 1.0% in 2017, increased 1.1% in 2018, increased 1.1% in 2019 and decreased 5.9% in the first six months
of 2020. Inflation, as measured by the Broad Consumer Price Index (Índice de Preços ao Consumidor Amplo),
or IPCA, published by IBGE, was 6.28%, 2.95%, 3.75% and 4.31% per year in 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively, and 0.1% in
the first six months of 2020. The U.S. dollar depreciated 16.5% against the real in 2016, 1.5% in 2017, 17.1% in 2018 and
0.6% in 2019. In the six months ended June 30, 2020, the U.S. dollar appreciated 26.4% against the real. Unemployment in
Brazil increased from 6.8% in January 2014 to 13.3% in June 2020. International reserves held by the Central Bank of Brazil decreased
from US$376.7 billion as of September 30, 2016 to US$356.6 billion as of September 30, 2020.
In
September 2015, Standard & Poor’s started to review the sovereign credit risk rating of Brazil, and downgraded it to
a grade below the investment grade and, since then Brazil had been successively downgraded by the three major credit rating agencies
worldwide. After the downgrading on September 30, 2015, Standard & Poor’s once more reduced the credit risk rating of
Brazil from BB+ to BB and, more recently, on January 11, 2018, it downgraded the sovereign credit risk rating of Brazil from BB
to BB- with stable outlook, citing the delay in the approval of tax measures intended to rebalance the government budget. In February
2016, Moody’s downgraded the credit risk rating of Brazil to a grade below the investment grade, to Ba2, with negative outlook,
which in April 2018 changed to a stable outlook. In February 2018, Fitch downgraded the sovereign credit risk rating of Brazil
to BB negative, which was reaffirmed in August 2018, with a stable outlook, citing structural weaknesses in public finance, high
government indebtedness, a poor growth outlook, political environment and issues related to corruption.
In
2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted economic activity and markets around the world, and its severity, magnitude
and duration are highly uncertain, rapidly changing and difficult to predict. Actual and potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic
on the global economy, the economies of certain countries and certain companies has led ratings agencies to review and downgrade
the credit ratings of sovereigns and issuers of securities around the world. In May 2020, Fitch downgraded the sovereign credit
rating of Brazil to BB- with negative outlook, citing the deterioration of the Brazilian economic environment as a result of political
instability and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. A potential further downgrade of the ratings of Brazil, our ratings, or those
of our debt securities could result in increased interest and other financial expenses related to our borrowings and debt securities
and could reduce our liquidity and ability to obtain additional financing under desired terms and conditions.
Other
Factors Affecting our Business
Market
price variations for commodities: our principal products are subject to changes in commodities prices, including those of
indexes such as the Intercontinental Exchange and the CBOT, exchange rates, as well as other indexes linked to our debts. Commodity
prices are generally influenced by international, domestic and local supply and demand, which are in turn influenced by climactic
and weather conditions, technology, and economic, commercial and political conditions, as well as exchange rates and transportation
costs. For more information, see “Item 3—Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to our Business and
Industry—Fluctuation in market prices for our agricultural products could adversely affect us” and “—
Qualitative Evaluation of Market Risks.”
Foreign
exchange: a portion of our income (loss) is linked to the exchange rate between the real and the U.S. dollar, and consequently
our revenue is sensitive to foreign exchange fluctuations. Certain of our commodities, such as soybean, may be priced in reais
or in U.S. dollars. In addition, certain of the raw materials necessary for farming activities, such as chemicals, pesticides
and fertilizers, are priced in or based on the U.S. dollar. See “Item 3—Key Information—Exchange Rates.”
Inflation:
inflation does not directly affect our revenue because our products are commodities whose prices are determined by reference to
international commodity exchanges. Nevertheless, our labor and other operating costs are affected by inflation which directly
affects our results of operations.
The
table below sets forth certain market indices that affect our operating and financial results:
|
|
Year
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
Source
|
Soybean
Price (Paranaguá)
|
|
(R$/bag)
|
|
|
|
Closing
|
|
|
115.32
|
|
|
|
81.80
|
|
|
|
86.54
|
|
|
Bloomberg
|
Exchange
rate
|
|
(R$
per US$ 1.00)
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
3.82
|
|
|
|
3.90
|
|
|
|
3.30
|
|
|
Bloomberg
|
Closing
|
|
|
5.48
|
|
|
|
3.83
|
|
|
|
3.85
|
|
|
Bloomberg
|
Average
|
|
|
4.47
|
|
|
|
3.86
|
|
|
|
3.34
|
|
|
Bloomberg
|
ATR
(R$/Kg of ATR)(1)
|
|
|
0.68
|
|
|
|
0.62
|
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
http://www.udop.com.br
|
Closing
IGP-M (%)(2)
|
|
|
7.31
|
%
|
|
|
6.51
|
%
|
|
|
6.92
|
%
|
|
Bloomberg
|
IPCA(3)
|
|
|
2.13
|
%
|
|
|
3.37
|
%
|
|
|
4.39
|
%
|
|
Bloomberg
|
CDI(4)
|
|
|
4.59
|
%
|
|
|
6.32
|
%
|
|
|
7.35
|
%
|
|
B3
|
NPK(5)
(R$/ton)
|
|
|
1,362.73
|
|
|
|
1,150.28
|
|
|
|
1,248.62
|
|
|
Bloomberg
|
|
(1)
|
ATR
corresponds to the quantity of sugar available in the raw material subtracted from the
losses in the industrial process.
|
|
(2)
|
IGP-M
is published monthly by FGV.
|
|
(3)
|
IPCA
is published monthly by IBGE.
|
|
(4)
|
The
CDI rate is the average of the rates of inter-bank deposits charged during the day in
Brazil (accumulated in the period).
|
|
(5)
|
NPK
is the chemical compound of farming fertilizers made up of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium
combined at a ratio of 2:20:20.
|
Principal
Components of Our Statement of Operations
Revenue
Our
operating revenue is derived mainly from the sale of (i) grains (comprised of soybean, corn, bean, cotton and sorghum); (ii) sugarcane;
(iii) cattle and (iv) other farming products.
Taxes
on sales
Taxes
on sales vary depending on the product and the market, as follows:
Tax
|
|
Direct
Export
|
|
Sale
to Importer/Exporter
|
|
Domestic
market
|
ICMS
|
|
Not levied
|
|
Not levied
|
|
Levied
|
PIS
|
|
Not levied
|
|
Not levied
|
|
Levied
|
COFINS
|
|
Not levied
|
|
Not levied
|
|
Levied
|
FUNRURAL
|
|
Not levied
|
|
Levied
|
|
Levied
|
FETHAB
|
|
Not levied
|
|
Levied
|
|
Levied
|
Below
is a description of the principal taxes on sales of our products:
ICMS
(Value-Added Tax on Sales and Services): ICMS is a state tax levied on the price of a product at an average rate of 18% for
transactions within a state and 7% to 12% for transactions across states. ICMS payments are not applicable to exports of goods
and services.
Federal
Social Integration Program (Programa de Integração Social, or PIS) and Social Security Financing Contribution
(Contribuição para o Financiamento da Seguridade Social, or COFINS): PIS and COFINS tax payments, levied
at (i) 0.65% and 3.0% of gross revenue, respectively (cumulative) or (ii) 1.65% and 7.6%, respectively, after certain deductions
(non-cumulative), depending on the business conducted and the nature of revenue earned, among other factors. PIS and COFINS payments
are not applicable to exports of goods and services, or sales to import/export companies located in Brazil. Since we sell the
entirety of our soybean production to such companies, such activities are not subject to PIS or COFINS payments. Brazilian law
also exempts PIS and COFINS payments upon the sale of sugarcane used for the production of ethanol or biofuel, sale of maize to
rural producers and manufacturers of animal feed and food and the sale of cattle.
Rural
Workers Assistance Fund (Fundo do Produtor Rural, or FUNRURAL): Agricultural producers are subject to a tax of 2.3% to 2.85%,
levied on total output sold. The FUNRURAL tax is not payable on exports of goods and services, but applies on direct sales to
import/export companies located in Brazil.
State
Fund for Transport and Housing (Fundo Estadual de Transporte e Habitação, or FETHAB) is a contribution per ton
of products (soybean, corn, beans) sold in the State of Mato Grosso, as follows: R$32.41 per ton of soybean, R$9.19 per ton of
corn and R$7.35 per ton of beans.
Gain
(loss) on sale of farms
Upon
the sale of investment property, such as our farms, we recognize in the statement of operations a gain (loss) for the difference
between the sale proceeds and the carrying amount of the property sold. We account for our investment properties at cost.
Changes
in fair value of biological assets
Our
biological assets consist mainly of the cultivation of soybean, corn, cotton, bean, sorghum, sugarcane and cattle raising (see
livestock), which are measured at fair value less cost to sell.
The
fair value of biological assets is determined upon their initial recognition and at each subsequent balance sheet date. Gains
and losses arising from the changes in fair value of biological assets is determined as the difference between fair value and
the costs incurred in the plantation and treatment of crops of biological assets at the balance sheet date, and are recorded in
the statement of operations in “Changes in fair value of biological assets.” In certain circumstances, the estimated
fair value less cost to sell approximate cost incurred at that moment, especially when only a minor biological transformation
has taken place or when no material impact is expected from that biological transformation on the price. Biological assets continue
to be recorded at their fair value.
The
sugarcane crop productive cycle is five years on average, and for a new cycle to start depends on the completion of the previous
cycle. In this regard, the current cycle is classified as biological asset in current assets, and the amount of the constitution
of the bearer plant (bearer of the other cycles) are classified as permanent culture in property, plant and equipment. The calculation
to estimate the value of the biological asset “sugarcane” was the discounted cash flow at a rate reflecting the risks
and the terms of the operation. As a result, we projected the future cash flows in accordance with the projected productivity
cycle, taking into consideration the estimated useful life of each area, the prices of total sugar recoverable, estimated productivity
and the related estimated costs of production, including the cost of land, harvest, loading and transportation for each hectare
planted. The soybean, corn and sorghum are temporary cultures, in which the agricultural product is harvested after a period of
time spanning from 110 to 180 days after the planting date, depending on the cultivation, variety, geographic location and climate
conditions. The calculation methodology used to estimate the value of the grains was the discounted cash flows at a rate reflecting
the risk and terms of operations. As a result, we projected the future cash flows taking into consideration the estimated productivity,
costs to be incurred based on the Company’s budget or on new internal estimates and market prices. The commodities’
prices available in futures markets, were obtained from quotes on the following boards of trade: CBOT (“Chicago Board of
Trade”), the B3, and NYBOT (“New York Board of Trade”). For the agricultural products not quoted in these markets,
we used the prices obtained through direct market surveys or disclosed by specialized companies. We considered the related logistic
expenses and tax discounts in order to arrive at the prices of each of these products in each production unit of the Company.
As
mentioned above, the fair value of the biological assets disclosed in the balance sheet was determined using valuation techniques
– the discounted cash flows method. The data used in these methods is based on the information observed in the market, whenever
possible, and if unavailable, a certain level of judgment is required to establish such fair value. Judgment is used the data
to be used, e.g. price, productivity and production cost. Changes in the assumptions on these inputs might affect the fair value
of biological assets.
Livestock
In
2016 the we began cattle raising operations, which typically consists of producing and selling beef calves after weaning, which
characterizes the activity as breeding.
For
segregation purposes, when applicable, the Company classifies its cattle herd into: beef cattle (current assets), which can be
sold as a biological asset for meat production; and dairy cattle (non-current assets), which is used in farm operations to generate
other biological assets. Up to the reporting date the Company only had beef cattle, which includes calves, heifers, cows and bulls.
The
fair value of beef cattle is determined based on market prices, given the existence of an active market. Gain or loss from changes
in the fair value of beef cattle is recognized in profit or loss for the period. The Company considered the prices in the cattle
market in Bahia state and the metrics used in the market. Accordingly, beef and dairy cattle are measured based on arroba and
the age bracket of animals.
Adjustment
to net realizable value of agricultural products after harvest
Agricultural
products from biological assets are measured at fair value when they are ready to be harvested, less selling expenses, when they
are reclassified from biological assets to inventories.
A
provision for adjustment of agricultural products to net realizable value is recognized when the fair value recorded in inventories
is higher than the net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business,
less estimated costs to sell. Adjustments to net realizable value are recognized in the statement of operations in “Adjustment
of net realizable value of agricultural products after harvest.”
Cost
of sales
Cost
of sales for sugarcane and grains includes: (i) the historical cost of the inventories including costs of raw materials such as
seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, fuels and lubricants, as well as labor, maintenance of machines and agricultural equipment, depreciation
and amortization and (ii) the difference between such historical cost and the fair value of the grains and sugarcane at the time
of harvest.
Operating
expenses
|
●
|
Selling expenses:
selling expenses refer mainly to shipping, storage, commissions, classification of products and other related expenses.
|
|
●
|
General and administrative
expenses: general and administrative expenses refer mainly to personnel, legal counsel, depreciation and amortization,
lease payments and expenses related to our headquarters.
|
Financial
income and expenses
Financial
income and expenses consist mainly of interest from financial investments, foreign exchange variations, monetary variations, interest
on financial assets and liabilities and realized and unrealized gains (losses) with derivative financial instruments.
Income
and social contribution-current and deferred taxes
Current
and deferred income and social contribution taxes refer to taxes on net profits. We and our subsidiaries Jaborandi Agrícola
Ltda., Agrifirma Bahia Agropecuária Ltda., I.A. Agro Ltda., GL Empreendimentos e Participações Ltda. and
Agrifirma Brasil Agropecuária S.A. assess such taxes under the taxable income regime, with a maximum rate of 34%, consisting
of: (i) income tax, at a rate of 15% of profits; (ii) income tax surcharge of 10% levied upon profits exceeding R$240,000 per
year; (iii) social contribution tax on net profit, at a rate of 9%; and (iv) deferred income and social contribution taxes.
Our
other subsidiaries assess such taxes under the presumed profit regime under which the tax base is computed as a percentage of
revenue. This consists of income and social contribution taxes at a rate of 15% (plus a 10% surcharge for amounts exceeding R$240,000
per year) and 9%, respectively, levied on (i) 8% and 12%, respectively, of property sales; (ii) 32% of leases and services; and
(iii) other revenue and capital gains.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements,
which have been prepared in accordance with IFRS. We summarize our significant accounting policies, judgments and estimates in
note 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
The
critical accounting policies described herein are important to the presentation of our financial condition and results of operations,
requiring the most difficult, subjective and complex judgments by our management, often as a result of the need to make estimates
and assumptions about matters that are inherently uncertain. While preparing our financial statements, our management uses estimates
and assumptions to record assets, liabilities and transactions. Our financial statements include different subjective and complex
estimates regarding, among others, accounting for revenue recognition for grains and farm sales and related accounts receivable,
determining the fair value of derivatives, biological assets and accounting for investments in investment properties, warrant,
residual value and useful life of property, plant and equipment, deferred taxes, share base payment and legal claims. In order
to provide a better understanding of how our management makes its judgments about future events, including the variables and assumptions
underlying such estimates, we have identified the following critical accounting policies.
Fair
value of biological assets
The
fair value of biological assets is determined using valuation techniques, including the discounted cash flows method. The inputs
for estimates are based on market information, whenever possible, and when such inputs are not available, a certain level of judgment
is required to estimate the fair value. Judgment involves, for example, price, productivity, crop cost and production cost. Changes
in the assumptions involving any of these factors may affect the fair value calculations of biological assets.
With
regard to cattle, the Company values its breeding stock at fair value based on market price for the region.
Residual
amount and useful life of property, plant and equipment and investment properties
The
residual amount and useful life of assets are assessed and adjusted when necessary at the end of each reporting period. The carrying
amount of the asset is immediately reduced to its recoverable value if the carrying amount is estimated to exceed the recoverable
value.
Legal
claims
We
are party to judicial and administrative lawsuits, as described in Item 8-Financial Information-Legal Proceedings. Provisions
are recorded for contingencies related to judicial lawsuits that are estimated to represent probable losses (present obligations
resulting from past events where an outflow of resources is probable and can be reliably estimated). The evaluation of the probability
of loss includes the opinion of external legal advisors. Management believes that these contingencies are properly recorded and
presented in the financial statements.
Revenue
from contracts with customers
We
recognize our revenue in an amount that reflects the Company’s expected consideration in exchange for the transfer of good
or services to a customer when all performance obligations have been fulfilled.
Sale
of goods
Our
revenue from grain and sugarcane sales is recognized when performance obligations are met, which consists of transferring the
significant risks and benefits of ownership of the goods are transferred to the purchaser, usually when the products are delivered
to the purchaser at the determined location, according to the agreed sales terms.
In
the case of grains, we normally perform forward contracts where the price is set up by us for the total or partial volume of grains
to be sold at the delivery date, based on the calculations agreed on the selling contracts. Certain selling contracts are established
in U.S. dollars where the amount in reais is also established based on the foreign exchange rate according to the sale
terms. The price can also be adjusted by other factors, such as humidity and other technical characteristics of grains. Upon the
grains delivery, the revenue is recognized based on the price established with each purchaser considering the foreign exchange
rate on the delivery date. After the grains are delivered to the addressee, the quality and final weight are evaluated, thus determining
the final price of the transaction, and adjusting the contractual amounts in accordance with such factors as well as by the foreign
exchange rate variation up to the settlement date.
As
for the sale of sugarcane, the Company generally enters into sales contracts for future delivery where data such as volume and
minimum ATR are pre-fixed. The price of sugarcane takes into account the amount of ATR per ton of sugar cane delivered, and the
value of the ATR, released monthly by CONSECANA.
Sale
of farms
Sales
of farms are not recognized until the performance obligation is met, which happens when: (i) control of the asset has been transferred;
(ii) the Company has determined that it is probable the sale price will be collected; and (iii) the amount of revenue can be reliably
measured. Usually these are met when the buyer makes the first down payment, and transfer of possession of the asset is completed,
according to the contractual terms. The result from sales of farms is presented in the statement of operations as “Gain
on sale of farm” at net value of the related cost.
Revenue
from cattle raising
Revenue
from the sale of beef cattle is recognized when the related performance obligations are met, which consists of transferring control
of the cattle to the buyer, usually when the cattle is delivered to the buyer at a specific place, in accordance with the contractual
terms.
The
beef cattle raising business consists of the production and sale of beef calves after weaning (rearing process). Some animals
that prove to be infertile may be sold to meat packers for slaughtering. At the Paraguay operations, the business consists of
growing and selling these animals for slaughtering. The price for the sale of cattle is based on the market price of the arroba
of fed cattle in the respective market on the transaction date, the animal weight, plus the premium related to the category. The
sale of cattle in Brazil and Paraguay operations, in turn, considers the price of the arroba of fed cattle or heifer/cow on the
date of sale in the respective market, applied to carcass yields.
Revenue
from leasing of land
The
revenues from operating lease of land are recognized on a straight-line basis over the leasing period. When the lease price is
defined in quantities of agricultural products or livestock, the lease amount is recognized considering the price of the agricultural
product or livestock effective at the balance sheet date or at the date established in contract. The amounts received in advance
as leasing, where applicable, are recognized in current liabilities. Leasing revenues in which a significant portion of the risks
and benefits of ownership are retained by the lessor are classified as operating leases.
Investment
properties
The
land of rural properties purchased by us is measured at acquisition cost, which does not exceed its net realizable value and is
presented in “Non-current assets.” The fair value of the investment properties are obtained through valuation reports
of the farms prepared by internal experts. The valuation is carried out according to market practices. Certain factors such as
location, type of soil, climate of the region, calculation of the improvements, presentation of the elements and calculation of
the land value are all taken into account during the valuation process.
Deferred
income and social contribution taxes
Deferred
income and social contribution taxes are calculated to take into account all tax timing differences as follows: (1) income or
expenses which are not yet taxable or deductible, such as gain on fair value of biological assets and provisions for contingencies,
respectively; and (2) tax loss carryforwards, which have no expiration, when realization or recovery in future periods is considered
probable.
Deferred
tax assets are generated under the taxable income regime only, based on our business plan. The business plan includes consideration
of a variety of factors including the 30% annual limitation for utilizing tax loss carryforwards and changes in the Brazilian
economic conditions. We evaluate whether a valuation allowance is required for these assets and deferred tax assets are recognized
only to the extent that is probable that the temporary differences will reverse in the foreseeable future and taxable profit will
be available against which the temporary differences can be utilized, otherwise a valuation allowance is recorded. We also include
in our evaluation the limitation of utilizing up to only 30% of annual taxable income in connection with recognition of tax loss
carryforwards.
Fair
value of financial instruments
When
the fair value of the financial assets and liabilities presented in the balance sheet cannot be obtained in the active market,
it is determined using valuation techniques, including the discounted cash flow method. The data for such methods is based on
those practiced in the market, when possible; however, when it is not viable, a certain level of judgment is required to establish
the fair value. The judgment includes considerations on the data used, such as liquidity risk, credit risk, and volatility. Changes
in the assumptions about these factors may affect the presented fair value of financial instruments.
Transactions
with share-based payment
We
measure the cost of transactions to be settled with shares with employees based on the fair value of equity instruments on the
grant date. The estimate of the fair value of share-based payments requires the determination of the most adequate pricing model
to grant equity instruments, which depends on the grant terms and conditions. It also requires the determination of the most adequate
data for the pricing model, including the expected option life, volatility and dividend yield, and the corresponding assumptions.
Leases
We
account for lease agreements in accordance with the requirements of IFRS 16 – Leases and recognize right-of-use assets and
lease liabilities for the lease operations under agreements that meet the requirements of the accounting standard. In order to
measure lease liabilities, our management considers only the minimum fixed lease payments. The measurement of lease liabilities
corresponds to the total future payments of leases and rentals, adjusted to present value, considering the incremental borrowing
rate.
New
standards, amendments and interpretations of standards
New
or amended pronouncements applied for the first time in the current fiscal year
We
applied for the first time the standards IFRS 16 – Leases and IFRIC 23 – Uncertainty over Income Tax Treatments at
the beginning of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, i.e., July 1, 2019. We have not adopted any other standard, interpretation
or amendment early that has been issued but is not yet effective. The nature and effect of the changes as a result of the adoption
of these new accounting standards are described below.
Since
our fiscal year begins on July 1, the standards that were effective on January 1, 2019 were initially adopted by us at the beginning
of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, i.e., July 1, 2019.
IFRS 16 – Leases
IFRS
16 superseded IAS 17 – Leases, IFRIC 4 – Determining whether an Arrangement contains a Lease, SIC-15 – Operating
Leases—Incentives and SIC-27 – Evaluating the Substance of Transactions Involving the Legal Form of a Lease. The IFRS
16 standard sets out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases and requires lessees
to recognize most leases on the balance sheet.
Lessor
accounting under IFRS 16 is substantially unchanged from IAS 17. Lessors will continue to classify leases as either operating
or finance leases using similar principles as in IAS 17. Therefore, IFRS 16 does not have an impact for leases where the Company
is the lessor.
The
Company adopted IFRS 16 using the modified restrospective method, with the date of initial application of July 1, 2019.
The
standard had significant impacts on the financial statements, since, according to the new principles introduced by IFRS 16, the
Company recognized lease liabilities and right-of-use assets on the date of initial application for leases previously classified
as operating leases. The Company’s main contracts are related to agricultural partnership operations and land lease, in
addition to other less relevant contracts that involve the lease of machinery, vehicles and properties. See Note 13 to our financial
statements.
The
Company elected to use the transition practical expedient to not reassess whether a contract is, or contains, a lease at July 1, 2019.
Instead, the Company applied the standard only to contracts that were previously identified as leases applying IAS 17 and IFRIC
4 at the date of initial application. The Company also elected to use the recognition exemptions for lease contracts that, at
the commencement date, have a lease term of 12 months or less and do not contain a purchase option (short-term leases), and lease
contracts for which the underlying asset is of low value (low-value assets).
The
right-of-use of the asset was measured at the amount equivalent to the lease liability, adjusted by the amount of any payments
made in advance or accumulated related to these leases that were recognized in the balance sheet immediately prior to the initial
adoption of the standard. Lease liabilities are discounted to present value using the incremental borrowing rate of the lessee
on the transition date.
IFRIC
23 – Uncertainty over income tax treatments
The
interpretation IFRIC 23 addresses the accounting for income taxes when tax treatments involve uncertainty that affects the application
of IAS 12 and does not apply to taxes or levies outside the scope of IAS 12, nor does it specifically include requirements relating
to interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax treatments.
The
Interpretation specifically addresses the following:
|
●
|
if the entity considers uncertain tax treatments separately;
|
|
●
|
the assumptions of the entity regarding the examination of tax treatments
by tax authorities;
|
|
●
|
how the entity determines taxable income (tax loss), calculation bases,
unused tax losses, tax credits from prior periods and tax rates;
|
|
●
|
how the entity considers changes in facts and circumstances.
|
The entity must determine if it considers each uncertain tax
treatment separately or jointly with one or more uncertain tax treatments. The entity must follow the approach that best provides
the resolution of the uncertainty. The interpretation is valid for annual periods starting after January 1, 2019. We adopted the
standard as of July 1, 2019 and concluded that there were no significant effects on our financial statements.
Standards
issued but not yet in force
Amendments
to IFRS 3: Defining businesses
In
October 2018, the IASB issued amendments to IFRS 3 regarding the definition of a business to help entities to determine if a set
of activities and assets acquired is a business or not. They clarify the minimum requirements for a company, eliminate the assessment
of if market participants are capable of replacing missing elements, include guidelines to help entities to evaluate if an acquired
process is substantive, determine better the definitions of business and outputs and introduce a test of concentration of optional
fair value. New illustrative cases were provided with the amendments.
Since
the amendments apply prospectively to transactions or other events occurring on the date or after the first-time adoption, the
Company will not be affected by these amendments on the transition date.
Amendments
to IAS 1 and IAS 8: Definition of material omission
In
October 2018, IASB issued amendments to IAS 1 and IAS 8 – Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors
to align the definition of omission in all standards, with the information material if omitting, misstating or obscuring if it
could reasonably influence decisions that the primary users of general purpose financial statements make on the basis of those
financial statements, which provide financial information about a specific reporting entity
Such
amendments are not expected to have a significant impact on our financial statements.
There
are no other standards and interpretations issued and not yet adopted that may, in the opinion of our management, significantly
impact profit or loss or shareholders’ equity disclosed by us.
JOBS
Act
On
April 5, 2012, the JOBS Act was signed into law. The JOBS Act contains provisions that, among other things, reduce certain requirements
for qualifying public companies.
Subject
to certain conditions set forth in the JOBS Act, if, as an “emerging growth company,” we choose to rely on such exemptions,
we may not be required to, among other things, provide an auditor’s attestation report on our internal control over financial
reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to comply with any PCAOB rules, that, if adopted in the future, would
require mandatory audit firm rotation and auditor discussion and analysis pursuant to any future audit rule promulgated by the
PCAOB. These exemptions apply until we are no longer an “emerging growth company.” The JOBS Act also provides “emerging
growth companies” an election to comply with new or revised accounting standards on a delayed basis for those standards
that have a different effective date for public and private companies. However, such election is limited to companies that prepare
their financial statements and report in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As our financial statements are prepared in accordance with IFRS, such accommodation is not available to us, and we will be required
to apply new or revised accounting standards under IFRS as from the effective date established in the corresponding standard.
Recent
Developments
Sale
of Bananal X Farm
On
February, 20, 2019 we entered into a commitment to purchase and sale agreement for the sale of all of the 2,160 hectares of the
Bananal X Farm, a property that had been held by Agrifirma Brasil Agropecuária S.A. since October 2011 and partially leased
(1,968 hectares) to Francisco Ferreira Camacho since June, 2016, located in Luís Eduardo Magalhães, in the State
of Bahia, comprised of 1,714 hectares of agricultural area and 446 hectares of legal reserve and permanent preservation area.
The farm had not been operated by us and was leased for the purpose of cattle raising.
The
sale price was R$28.0 million, which was divided into seven installments, with an advance of R$2.0 million to be paid in two installments,
with the first installment becoming due on February 20, 2019 and the second 30 days thereafter. The two advance installments were
received and are recorded as advances from customers.
A
disagreement with the lessee of the area upon the sale prevented its immediate recognition until our current fiscal year and reporting
date, and the asset remained registered under non-current assets held for sale. In July 2020, the parties concluded the agreement,
the conditions precedent were fully met and, on July 31, 2020, the ownership of the farm was transferred, consummating the sale
of the Bananal X farm.
The
conditions precedent set forth in the sale agreement were fully met on July 31, 2020 after the receipt of R$5.5 million. The nominal
sale value was R$28.0 million, of which we already received R$7.5 million. The remainder of the sale price will be paid to us
in three annual installments in 2021, 2022 and 2023 in the amounts of R$6.0 million, R$7.0 million and R$7.5 million, respectively.
2020
Cybersecutity Incident
In
year ended June 30, 2020, we were subject to a ransomware cyberattack that caused a partial and temporary interruption of our
operations. We implemented our contingency plans, continued operating partially during the cyberattack, and progressively reconnected
our operating systems following the attack.
Following
the incident, we have taken certain additional preventative measures to address cybersecurity risks, such as review and identification
of the vulnerabilities in our IT environment, review of the processes and procedures related to firewall and logical access management,
including IT systems and databases, and implementation of logical access and information security controls to address the risks
identified.
Although
the source of the cyberattack could not be identified, the process and characteristics of the cyberattack could be satisfactorily
identified, and we believe the procedures described above will assist us in reviewing our information technology systems to prevent
further cyberattacks in the future.
See
“Item 3. Key Information––D. Risk Factors—We were the target of a cybersecurity incident that disrupted
our systems.”
Results
of Operations
The
following discussion of our results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with
IFRS. The discussion of the results of our business segments is based upon financial information reported for each of the segments
of our business, as presented in the table below.
The
following tables set forth operating results of each of our segments and the reconciliation of these results to our consolidated
statement of income.
|
|
Year
Ended June 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
(in
R$ thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agricultural
activity
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Real estate
|
|
|
Grains
|
|
|
Cotton
|
|
|
Sugarcane
|
|
|
Cattle
raising
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Net
revenue
|
|
|
487,568
|
|
|
|
14,680
|
|
|
|
233,413
|
|
|
|
13,052
|
|
|
|
192,942
|
|
|
|
32,674
|
|
|
|
807
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gain
from sale of farm
|
|
|
61,420
|
|
|
|
61,420
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gain
(loss) on fair value of biological assets and agricultural products
|
|
|
160,371
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
86,373
|
|
|
|
1,373
|
|
|
|
75,861
|
|
|
|
(1,298
|
)
|
|
|
(1,938
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Reversal
of provision for agricultural products after harvest
|
|
|
(4,153
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(4,153
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
(483,813
|
)
|
|
|
(4,876
|
)
|
|
|
(245,805
|
)
|
|
|
(13,529
|
)
|
|
|
(184,811
|
)
|
|
|
(32,436
|
)
|
|
|
(2,356
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
221,393
|
|
|
|
71,224
|
|
|
|
69,828
|
|
|
|
896
|
|
|
|
83,992
|
|
|
|
(1,060
|
)
|
|
|
(3,487
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income (expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling
expenses
|
|
|
(14,300
|
)
|
|
|
3,731
|
|
|
|
(16,247
|
)
|
|
|
(282
|
)
|
|
|
(1,136
|
)
|
|
|
(366
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
General
and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(43,890
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(43,890
|
)
|
Other
operating income
|
|
|
1,231
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,231
|
|
Equity
pickup
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
Operating
income (loss)
|
|
|
164,284
|
|
|
|
74,955
|
|
|
|
53,581
|
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
|
82,856
|
|
|
|
(1,426
|
)
|
|
|
(3,487
|
)
|
|
|
(42,809
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
financial income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
income
|
|
|
375,413
|
|
|
|
146,161
|
|
|
|
11,325
|
|
|
|
886
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
23,053
|
|
|
|
193,988
|
|
Financial
expenses
|
|
|
(406,168
|
)
|
|
|
(133,795
|
)
|
|
|
(39,362
|
)
|
|
|
(3,651
|
)
|
|
|
(4,828
|
)
|
|
|
(1,532
|
)
|
|
|
(43,175
|
)
|
|
|
(179,825
|
)
|
Income
(loss) before taxes
|
|
|
133,529
|
|
|
|
87,321
|
|
|
|
25,544
|
|
|
|
(2,151
|
)
|
|
|
78,028
|
|
|
|
(2,958
|
)
|
|
|
(23,609
|
)
|
|
|
(28,646
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
and social contribution taxes
|
|
|
(13,975
|
)
|
|
|
(6,722
|
)
|
|
|
(8,685
|
)
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
(26,530
|
)
|
|
|
1,006
|
|
|
|
8,027
|
|
|
|
18,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss) for the year
|
|
|
119,554
|
|
|
|
80,599
|
|
|
|
16,859
|
|
|
|
(1,420
|
)
|
|
|
51,498
|
|
|
|
(1,952
|
)
|
|
|
(15,582
|
)
|
|
|
(10,448
|
)
|
|
|
Year
Ended June 30, 2019
|
|
|
|
(in
R$ thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agricultural
activity
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Real estate
|
|
|
Grains
|
|
|
Cotton
|
|
|
Sugarcane
|
|
|
Cattle
raising
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Net
revenue
|
|
|
357,910
|
|
|
|
8,520
|
|
|
|
171,735
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
160,476
|
|
|
|
16,795
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gain
from sale of farm
|
|
|
142,812
|
|
|
|
142,812
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gain
(loss) on fair value of biological assets and agricultural products
|
|
|
56,718
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
18,714
|
|
|
|
2,619
|
|
|
|
34,511
|
|
|
|
1,526
|
|
|
|
(652
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Reversal
of provision for agricultural products after harvest
|
|
|
(2,040
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,040
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
(319,214
|
)
|
|
|
(1,788
|
)
|
|
|
(156,656
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(142,303
|
)
|
|
|
(17,118
|
)
|
|
|
(1,349
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
236,186
|
|
|
|
149,544
|
|
|
|
31,753
|
|
|
|
2,619
|
|
|
|
52,684
|
|
|
|
1,203
|
|
|
|
(1,617
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income (expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling
expenses
|
|
|
(10,536
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(10,885
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
General
and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(38,812
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(38,812
|
)
|
Other
operating income
|
|
|
(1,064
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,064
|
)
|
Equity
pickup
|
|
|
1,102
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,102
|
|
Operating
income (loss)
|
|
|
186,876
|
|
|
|
149,509
|
|
|
|
20,868
|
|
|
|
2,619
|
|
|
|
52,684
|
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
(1,032
|
)
|
|
|
(38,774
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
financial income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
income
|
|
|
310,538
|
|
|
|
93,460
|
|
|
|
13,699
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
79,232
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
11,549
|
|
|
|
112,598
|
|
Financial
expenses
|
|
|
(297,616
|
)
|
|
|
(116,502
|
)
|
|
|
(9,566
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(44,569
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(126,600
|
)
|
Income
(loss) before taxes
|
|
|
199,798
|
|
|
|
126,467
|
|
|
|
25,001
|
|
|
|
2,619
|
|
|
|
86,968
|
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
10,517
|
|
|
|
(52,776
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
and social contribution taxes
|
|
|
(22,719
|
)
|
|
|
(7,724
|
)
|
|
|
(8,500
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(341
|
)
|
|
|
(3,576
|
)
|
|
|
26,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss) for the year
|
|
|
177,079
|
|
|
|
118,743
|
|
|
|
16,501
|
|
|
|
2,619
|
|
|
|
(29,569
|
)
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
6,941
|
|
|
|
(25,785
|
)
|
|
|
Year
Ended June 30, 2018
|
|
|
|
(in
R$ thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agricultural
activity
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Real
estate
|
|
|
Grains
|
|
|
Cotton
|
|
|
Sugarcane
|
|
|
Cattle
raising
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Net
revenue
|
|
|
244,278
|
|
|
|
5,133
|
|
|
|
97,180
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
138,143
|
|
|
|
4,081
|
|
|
|
(259
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gain
from sale of farm
|
|
|
39,817
|
|
|
|
39,817
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gain
(loss) on fair value of biological assets and agricultural products
|
|
|
99,083
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
55,584
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
43,952
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
(692
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Reversal
of provision for agricultural products after harvest
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
(228,319
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(89,633
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(134,028
|
)
|
|
|
(4,378
|
)
|
|
|
(280
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
155,742
|
|
|
|
44,950
|
|
|
|
64,036
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
48,067
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(1,253
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income (expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling
expenses
|
|
|
(10,087
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(9,730
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(383
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
General
and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(34,945
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(34,945
|
)
|
Other
operating income
|
|
|
35,432
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
35,432
|
|
Equity
pickup
|
|
|
14,671
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
14,671
|
|
Operating
income (loss)
|
|
|
160,813
|
|
|
|
44,950
|
|
|
|
54,306
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
48,067
|
|
|
|
(441
|
)
|
|
|
(1,227
|
)
|
|
|
15,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
financial income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
income
|
|
|
129,323
|
|
|
|
20,843
|
|
|
|
12,388
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
18,208
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
18,501
|
|
|
|
59,383
|
|
Financial
expenses
|
|
|
(137,879
|
)
|
|
|
(5,158
|
)
|
|
|
(6,606
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(20,597
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(18,261
|
)
|
|
|
(87,257
|
)
|
Income
(loss) before taxes
|
|
|
152,257
|
|
|
|
60,635
|
|
|
|
60,088
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
45,678
|
|
|
|
(441
|
)
|
|
|
(987
|
)
|
|
|
(12,716
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
and social contribution taxes
|
|
|
(25,919
|
)
|
|
|
(20,616
|
)
|
|
|
(20,430
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(15,531
|
)
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
30,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss) for the year
|
|
|
126,338
|
|
|
|
40,019
|
|
|
|
39,658
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
30,147
|
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
(652
|
)
|
|
|
17,457
|
|
The
table below shows a summary of our statement of operations for the years indicated.
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
(in
R$ thousands, except share and per share information)
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
487,568
|
|
|
|
357,910
|
|
|
|
244,278
|
|
Gain
on sale of farms
|
|
|
61,420
|
|
|
|
142,812
|
|
|
|
39,817
|
|
Changes
in fair value of biological assets and agricultural products
|
|
|
160,371
|
|
|
|
56,718
|
|
|
|
99,083
|
|
Adjustments
to net realizable value of agricultural products after harvest, net
|
|
|
(4,153
|
)
|
|
|
(2,040
|
)
|
|
|
883
|
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
(483,813
|
)
|
|
|
(319,214
|
)
|
|
|
(228,319
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
221,393
|
|
|
|
236,186
|
|
|
|
155,742
|
|
Selling
expenses
|
|
|
(14,300
|
)
|
|
|
(10,536
|
)
|
|
|
(10,087
|
|
General
and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(43,890
|
)
|
|
|
(38,812
|
)
|
|
|
(34,945
|
|
Other
operating income (expenses) net
|
|
|
1,231
|
|
|
|
(1,064
|
)
|
|
|
35,432
|
|
Share
of (loss) profit of a joint venture
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
1,102
|
|
|
|
14,671
|
|
Operating
income (loss)
|
|
|
164,284
|
|
|
|
186,876
|
|
|
|
160,813
|
|
Financial
income
|
|
|
375,413
|
|
|
|
310,538
|
|
|
|
129,323
|
|
Financial
expenses
|
|
|
(406,168
|
)
|
|
|
(297,616
|
)
|
|
|
(137,879
|
|
Financial
(expense) income, net
|
|
|
(30,755
|
)
|
|
|
12,922
|
|
|
|
(8,566
|
|
Profit
before income and social contribution taxes
|
|
|
133,529
|
|
|
|
199,798
|
|
|
|
152,257
|
|
Income
and social contribution taxes
|
|
|
(13,975
|
)
|
|
|
(22,719
|
)
|
|
|
(25,919
|
)
|
Net
Profit for the year
|
|
|
119,554
|
|
|
|
177,079
|
|
|
|
126,338
|
|
Profit
attributable to equity holders of the parent
|
|
|
119,554
|
|
|
|
177,079
|
|
|
|
126,338
|
|
Issued
shares at the fiscal year end
|
|
|
62,104,301
|
|
|
|
56,888,916
|
|
|
|
56,888,916
|
|
Basic
earnings per share
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
|
|
3.29
|
|
|
|
2.35
|
|
Diluted
earnings per share
|
|
|
2.09
|
|
|
|
3.27
|
|
|
|
2.35
|
|
Year
Ended June 30, 2020 Compared to Year Ended June 30, 2019
Net
revenue
Net
revenue increased R$129.7 million from R$357.9 million for the year ended June 30, 2019 to R$487.6 million for the year ended
June 30, 2020. This increase was mainly due to the following:
|
i.
|
Revenue from
sugarcane sales: revenue from sugarcane sales increased R$32.5 million from R$160.5 million (reflecting sales of 1,781,229
tons at an average price of R$90.09 per ton) for the year ended June 30, 2019 to R$192.9 million (reflecting sales of 2,062,354
tons at an average price of R$93.55 per ton) for the year ended June 30, 2020. This represents an increase of 20.2% over the
previous year, mainly resulting from the increase in average per-ton sugarcane sales price and the increase in sales volume.
The increase in per-ton sugarcane price was due to the higher price of the TRS (total recoverable sugar) of sugarcane sold.
In the same period, there was also an increase in the price of the TRS per ton of harvested sugarcane, from R$0.639 per kg
in 2019 to R$0.672 per kg in 2020.
|
|
ii.
|
Revenue from
grain sales: revenue from grain sales increased R$61.7 million from R$171.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2019 (reflecting
sales of 158,454 tons at an average price of R$1,083.8 per ton) to R$233.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2020 (reflecting
sales of 252,386 tons at an average price of R$1,081.3 per ton). This represented an increase of 35.9% over the previous year
resulting from increases in sales volume, represented mainly by revenues from soybean and corn sales, as explained below:
|
|
●
|
Revenue from
soybean sales: revenue from soybean sales increased R$33.5 million from R$161.7 million (reflecting sales of 137,114 tons
at an average price of R$1,179.45 per ton) for the year ended June 30, 2019 to R$195.2 million (reflecting sales of 166,145
tons at an average price of R$1,174.92 per ton) for the year ended June 30, 2020. This represents an increase of 20.7% over
the previous year resulting from an increase in sales volume, which was a result of the increase in the number of hectares
planted, in line with our strategy to continuously develop arable areas at the farms we operate.
|
|
●
|
Revenue from
corn sales: revenue from corn sales increased R$25.0 million from R$10.0 million (reflecting sales of 21,340 tons at an
average price of R$469.35 per ton) for the year ended June 30, 2019 to R$35.0 million (reflecting sales of 84,686 tons at
an average price of R$413.60 per ton) for the year ended June 30, 2020. This represents an increase of 249.7% over the previous
year, which was a result of the increase in the number of hectares planted, in line with our strategy to continuously develop
arable areas at the farms we operate.
|
|
iii.
|
Revenue from
cattle sales: cattle-raising revenue by R$15.9 million from R$16.8 million (related to the sale of 8,750 head of cattle
at R$5.18 per kilo) for the year ended June 30, 2019 to R$32.7 million (related to the sale of 15,159 head of cattle at R$5.72
per kilo) for the year ended June 30, 2020. The increase in the number of head of cattle sold is a result of the maturity
of the herd held by us as well as the acquisition of head of cattle in the period.
|
The
table below shows a summary of the number of hectares harvested, productivity and revenues from grain and sugarcane production:
|
|
Harvest
(hectares)
|
|
|
Productivity
(tons)
|
|
|
Revenue
(in R$ thousands)
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
Grain
|
|
|
81,905
|
|
|
|
66,899
|
|
|
|
252,386
|
|
|
|
158,454
|
|
|
|
233,413
|
|
|
|
171,735
|
|
Sugarcane
|
|
|
29,169
|
|
|
|
31,832
|
|
|
|
2,062,354
|
|
|
|
1,781,229
|
|
|
|
192,942
|
|
|
|
160,476
|
|
Gain
on sale of farms
For
the year ended June 30, 2020, we sold 3,199 hectares of the Jatobá and Alto Taquari Farms in the States of Bahia and Mato
Grosso, respectively, for R$71.5 million at a cost of R$10.1 million, including indirect taxes. For the year ended June 30, 2019,
we sold 13,011 hectares of the Jatobá and Alto Taquari Farms in the States of Bahia and Mato Grosso, respectively, for
R$177.2 million at a cost of R$34.4 million, including indirect taxes.
Changes
in fair value of biological assets and agricultural products
Changes
in fair value of biological assets and agricultural products increased R$103.7 million from a gain of R$56.7 million for the year
ended June 30, 2019 to a gain of R$160.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2020. This variation resulted mainly from the increase
in the fair value of biological assets and agricultural products of grains from a gain of R$18.1 million for the year ended June
30, 2019 to a gain of R$86.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2020. Such variation was mainly due to an increase in the soybean
and corn yields in relation to the previous year. In addition, the fair value of biological assets and agricultural products of
sugarcane varied from a gain of R$34.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2019 to a gain of R$75.9 million for the year ended
June 30, 2020. Such variation was a result of the increase in productivity due to rainfall levels.
Adjustments
to net realizable value of agricultural products after harvest
We
recognized an impairment of net realizable value of agricultural products after harvest of R$2.0 million for the year ended June
30, 2019. For the year ended June 30, 2020, we recognized an impairment of net realizable value of agricultural products after
harvest of R$4.2 million. Such variations resulted from the decrease in the corn and soybean prices from the harvest time to the
end of the respective fiscal year, mainly due to price volatility during the harvest caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Cost
of sales
Cost
of sales increased R$164.6 million from R$319.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2019 to R$483.8 million for the year ended
June 30, 2020.
Changes
in costs year-over-year are directly linked to the market prices of commodities at the time of harvest as well as the harvested
volumes (tons), as explained below:
|
i.
|
Cost of soybean
sold: the cost of soybean sold increased by R$58.6 million. Our average cost per ton of soybean sold increased 15.2% from
R$1,077.50 per ton (corresponding to 137,114 tons at a total cost of R$147.7 million) for the year ended June 30, 2019 to
R$1,241.64 per ton (corresponding to 166,145 tons at a total cost of R$206.3 million) for the year ended June 30, 2020.
|
|
ii.
|
Cost of corn
sold: the cost of corn sold increased by R$23.8 million. Our average cost per ton of corn sold decreased 7.6% from R$417.81
per ton (corresponding to 21,340 tons at a total cost of R$8.9 million) for the year ended June 30, 2019 to R$385.9 per ton
(corresponding to 84,686 tons at a total cost of R$32.7 million) for the year ended June 30, 2020.
|
|
iii.
|
Cost of sugarcane
sold: the cost of sugarcane increased by R$42.5 million. Our average cost per ton of sugarcane sold increased 12.2% from
R$79.71 per ton (corresponding to 1,781,229 tons at a total cost of R$142.3 million) for the year ended June 30, 2019 to R$89.61
per ton (corresponding to 2,062,354 tons at a total cost of R$184.8 million) for the year ended June 30, 2020.
|
In
2020 depreciation and amortization increased by R$36.2 million from R$22.5 million in the year ended June 30, 2019 to R$58.7 million
in the year ended June 30, 2020, mainly due to the amortization of the right-of-use asstes recognized upon the adoption of IFRS
16.
Gross
profit
For
the reasons mentioned above, our gross profit for the year ended June 30, 2020 was R$221.4 million, representing a decrease of
R$14.8 million, compared to R$236.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2019.
Selling
expenses
Selling
expenses increased by R$3.8 million from R$10.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2019 to R$14.3 million for the year ended
June 30, 2020, primarily as a result of the increase in freight and storage expenses from R$9.6 million in the year ended June
30, 2019 to R$14.5 million in the year ended June 30, 2020, due to the increase in grain sales volume in the year ended June 30,
2020, which was partially offset by the provision for expected credit losses, which, for the year ended June 30, 2020, presented
a reversal of the provision resulting in a gain in the amount of R$2.4 million, while for the year ended June 30, 2019 there was
an addition to the provision resulting in a loss of R$0.5 million.
General
and administrative expenses
General
and administrative expenses increased R$5.1 million from R$38.8 million for the year ended June 30, 2019 to R$43.9 million for
the year ended June 30, 2020. This increase was primarily a result of the expenses related to personnel due to the payment of
taxes related to the Long-Term Stock-Based Incentive Plan approved by the Company in 2017, the increase with service providers,
due to the Agrifirma merger and of the increase of software expenses, impacted by the increase in the dollar.
Other
operating income (expenses), net
For
the year ended June 30, 2019, other operating expenses, net, amounted to R$1.1 million. For the year ended June 30, 2020, other
operating income, net, amounted to R$1.2 million. The merger with Agrifirma impacted other operating income and expenses, mainly
due to transaction costs and the changes in fair value of subscription warrants and restricted shares issued by us. Additionally,
in the year ended June 30, 2020, we recognized a gain of R$6.3 million as insurance compensation due to the losses in Paraguay
caused by climate conditions.
Equity
pickup
For
the year ended June 30, 2020 we recorded an expense of R$0.2 million compared to a gain of R$1.1 million for the year ended June
30, 2019.
Financial
income (expenses), net
Financial
income increased R$64.9 million from R$310.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2019 to R$375.4 million for the year ended June
30, 2020 and financial expenses increased R$108.6 million from R$297.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2019 to R$406.2 million
for the year ended June 30, 2019. The variation in financial income (expenses), net is mainly attributable to:
|
i.
|
The decrease in
the gain on remeasurement of receivables from the sales of farms and leases from R$173.0 million for the year ended June 30,
2019 to R$146.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2020 and the decrease in the loss on remeasurement of receivables from
the sale of farms and leases from R$161.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2019 to R$108.6 million for the year ended June
30, 2020, which related mainly to the adjustment to the present value of such receivables. The net gain on remeasurement of
receivables from the sale of farms and machinery of R$37.5 million was due to the variation in the amount to be received due
to the sales of the Araucária, Alto Taquari and Jatobá Farms, totaling 3.7 million soybean bags. This variation
is explained by the soybean price index, considering the Chicago Stock Exchange (CBOT), port premium (basis), exchange rate
and interest rate (with reference to the CDI).
|
|
ii.
|
The increase in
foreign exchange income from R$17.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2019 to R$14.0 million for the year ended June 30,
2020 and the increase in foreign exchange expenses from R$17.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2019 to R$15.8 million
for the year ended June 30, 2020, which resulted in a net loss of R$1.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2020.
|
|
iii.
|
The increase of
R$91.9 million of realized and unrealized gains on derivatives transactions from R$114.3 million for the year ended June 30,
2019 to R$206.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2020 and the increase of R$155.8 million of realized and unrealized losses
on derivatives transactions from R$98.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2019 to R$254.4 million for the year ended June
30, 2020. For the year ended June 30, 2020, the net result of derivative transactions was a loss of R$48.2 million, of which
R$68.8 million loss is related to currency operations and R$20.9 million gain is related to operations with commodities. For
the year ended June 30, 2019, derivative operations totaled R$15.7 million gain, of which R$10.1 million are related to currency
operations and R$5.6 million are in operations with commodities. The derivatives result reflects the commodities hedge operations
results and the impact of the exchange variation on cash, which was partially dollarized in order to maintain purchasing power
with regard to inputs, investments and new acquisitions, which have a positive correlation with the U.S. dollar.
|
|
iv.
|
The increase in
interest on marketable securities and receivables from R$6.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2019 to R$9.0 million for
the year ended June 30, 2020.
|
|
v.
|
The increase in
interest on marketable securities expenses from R$294.0 thousand for the year ended June 30, 2019 to R$1.5 million for the
year ended June 30, 2020 in connection with the increase of the total amount of long-term loans and financing for farm development.
|
Income
and social contribution taxes
We
recognized income and social contribution tax expenses of R$14.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2020 and of R$22.7 million
for the year ended June 30, 2019. Current income and social contribution tax expenses remained the same, at R$10.5 million for
the years ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2020. Deferred income and social contribution tax expenses decreased from R$12.2 million
for the year ended June 30, 2019 to R$3.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2020.
Profit
for the year
As
a result of the above, profit for the year ended June 30, 2020 decreased to R$119.6 million, compared to R$177.1 million for the
year ended June 30, 2019.
Year
Ended June 30, 2019 Compared to Year Ended June 30, 2018
Net
revenue
Net
revenue increased R$113.6 million from R$244.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2018 to R$357.9 million for the year ended
June 30, 2019. This increase was mainly due to the following:
|
i.
|
Revenue from
sugarcane sales: revenue from sugarcane sales increased R$22.3 million from R$138.1 million (reflecting sales of 1,681,530
tons at an average price of R$82.15 per ton) for the year ended June 30, 2018 to R$160.5 million (reflecting sales of 1,781,229
tons at an average price of R$90.09 per ton) for the year ended June 30, 2019. This represents an increase of 16.2% over the
previous year, mainly resulting from the increase in average per-ton sugarcane sales price and the increase in sales volume.
The increase in sugarcane sales was mainly due to the increase in average per-ton sugarcane sales price, which reflected a
5.2% increase in the CONSECANA (sugarcane price index in Brazil), from R$0.607/kg for the year ended June 30, 2018 to R$0.639/kg
for the year ended June 30, 2019.
|
|
ii.
|
Revenue from
grain sales: revenue from grain sales increased R$74.6 million from R$97.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2018 (reflecting
sales of 105,320 tons at an average price of R$922.7 per ton) to R$171.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2019 (reflecting
sales of 158,454 tons at an average price of R$1,083.8 per ton). This represented an increase of 76.7% over the previous year
resulting from an increase in sales volume, which was partially offset by a decrease in sales price, represented mainly by
revenues from soybean and corn sales, as explained below:
|
|
●
|
Revenue from
soybean sales: revenue from soybean sales increased R$77.9 million from R$83.8 million (reflecting sales of 74,237 tons
at an average price of R$1,124.02 per ton) for the year ended June 30, 2018 to R$161.7 million (reflecting sales of 137,114
tons at an average price of R$1,179.45 per ton) for the year ended June 30, 2019. This represents an increase of 93.0% over
the previous year resulting from an increase in sales volume, which was a result of the increase in the number of hectares
planted mainly due to the incorporation of 23,038 hectares of the Partnership V Farm.
|
|
●
|
Revenue from
corn sales: revenue from corn sales decreased R$3.4 million from R$13.4 million (reflecting sales of 31,083 tons at an
average price of R$431.10 per ton) for the year ended June 30, 2018 to R$10.0 million (reflecting sales of 21,340 tons at
an average price of R$469.35 per ton) for the year ended June 30, 2019. This represents a decrease of 25.3% over the previous
year, which was a result of the decrease in productivity from 7,598 kg/hectare for the year ended June 30, 2018 to 4,808 kg/hectare
for the year ended June 30, 2019, explained by poor weather conditions in Brazil and Paraguay and an unexpected wild animal
invasion in the Partnership V Farm, which had its first harvest under BrasilAgro’s operation during this period.
|
The
table below shows a summary of the number of hectares harvested, productivity and revenues from grain and sugarcane production:
|
|
Harvest
(hectares)
|
|
|
Productivity
(tons)
|
|
|
Revenue
(in R$ thousands)
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
Grain
|
|
|
66,899
|
|
|
|
35,207
|
|
|
|
158,454
|
|
|
|
105,320
|
|
|
|
171,735
|
|
|
|
97,180
|
|
Sugarcane
|
|
|
31,832
|
|
|
|
25,452
|
|
|
|
1,781,229
|
|
|
|
1,681,530
|
|
|
|
160,476
|
|
|
|
138,143
|
|
Gain
on sale of farms
For
the year ended June 30, 2019, we sold 13,011 hectares of the Jatobá and Alto Taquari Farms in the States of Bahia and Mato
Grosso, respectively, for R$177.2 million at a cost of R$34.4 million, including indirect taxes. For the year ended June 30, 2018,
we sold 956 hectares of the Araucária Farm in the State of Goiás for R$52.4 million at a cost of R$12.6 million,
including indirect taxes. In addition, a total of R$3.8 million was recorded in the year ended June 30, 2019 related to the sale
of Fazenda Cremaq in 2015, relating to an area of 6,020 hectares that was in the process of a geo-referencing dismemberment which
caused registration of the real estate to be pending. Once the registration was effected, the amount was released and recorded.
Changes
in fair value of biological assets and agricultural products
Changes
in fair value of biological assets and agricultural products decreased R$42.4 million from a gain of R$99.1 million for the year
ended June 30, 2018 to a gain of R$56.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2019. This variation resulted mainly from the decrease
in the fair value of biological assets and agricultural products of grains from a gain of R$54.9 million for the year ended June
30, 2018 to a gain of R$18.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2019. Such variation was mainly due to a decrease in the soybean
and corn yields in relation to the previous year. In addition, the fair value of biological assets and agricultural products of
sugarcane varied from a gain of R$43.9 million for the year ended June 30, 2018 to a gain of R$34.5 million for the year ended
June 30, 2019. Such variation was a result of the decrease in productivity due to rainfall levels.
Adjustments
to net realizable value of agricultural products after harvest
We
recognized a reversal of impairment of net realizable value of agricultural products after harvest of R$0.9 million for the year
ended June 30, 2018. For the year ended June 30, 2019, we recognized an impairment of net realizable value of agricultural products
after harvest of R$2.0 million. Such variations resulted from the decrease in the corn and soybean prices from the harvest time
to the end of the respective fiscal year.
Cost
of sales
Cost
of sales increased R$90.9 million from R$228.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2018 to R$319.2 million for the year ended
June 30, 2019. Changes in costs year-over-year are directly linked to the market prices of commodities at the time of harvest
as well as the harvested volumes (tons), as explained below:
|
i.
|
Cost of soybean
sold: the cost of soybean sold increased by R$68.0 million. Our average cost per ton of soybean sold increased 0.4% from
R$1,073.32 per ton (corresponding to 74,237 tons at a total cost of R$79.7 million) for the year ended June 30, 2018 to R$1,077.50
per ton (corresponding to 137,114 tons at a total cost of R$147.7 million) for the year ended June 30, 2019.
|
|
ii.
|
Cost of corn
sold: the cost of corn sold increased by R$1.0 million. Our average cost per ton of corn sold increased 30.5% from R$320.21
per ton (corresponding to 31,083 tons at a total cost of R$9.9 million) for the year ended June 30, 2018 to R$417.81 per ton
(corresponding to 21,340 tons at a total cost of R$8.9 million) for the year ended June 30, 2019.
|
|
iii.
|
Cost of sugarcane
sold: the cost of sugarcane increased by R$8.3 million. Our average cost per ton of sugarcane sold increased 0.2% from
R$79.71 per ton (corresponding to 1,681,530 tons at a total cost of R$134.0 million) for the year ended June 30, 2018 to R$79.71
per ton (corresponding to 1,781,229 tons at a total cost of R$142,3 million) for the year ended June 30, 2019.
|
Gross
profit
For
the reasons mentioned above, our gross profit for the year ended June 30, 2019 was R$236.2 million, representing an increase of
R$80.4 million, compared to R$155.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2018.
Selling
expenses
Selling
expenses increased R$0.4 million from R$10.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2018 to R$10.5 million for the year ended June
30, 2019, primarily as a result of the increase in freight expenses, which reflects the amount of grain sold in the period, from
R$4.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2018 to R$7.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2019 with an increase in the freight
rate, and also an increase in the provision for expected credit losses, which were partially offset by a decrease in expenses
with storage and processing.
General
and administrative expenses
General
and administrative expenses increased R$3.9 million from R$34.9 million for the year ended June 30, 2018 to R$38.8 million for
the year ended June 30, 2019. This increase was primarily a result of the expenses related to personnel due to the provision for
the Long-Term Stock-Based Incentive Plan, the payment of bonuses and Social Security (INSS), an increase in leases and rents in
general, due to the grace period agreed in the renegotiation of lease contracts, which ended last harvest, and an increase in
software expenses, refering to the implementation of the esocial social security management system and to the effect of
exchange rate variation on subscriptions.
Other
operating income (expenses), net
For
the year ended June 30, 2018, other operating income, net, amounted to R$35.4 million, which reflects the recognition of amounts
incurred with the conclusion of the re-distribution of assets and liabilities of Cresca in Paraguay, in the amount of R$35.7 million,
which comprise R$5.1 million of effect of fair value measurement and R$30.6 million of currency translation adjustment. For the
year ended June 30, 2019, other operating expenses, net, amounted to R$1.1 million.
Equity
pickup
For
the year ended June 30, 2019 we recorded a gain of R$1.1 million related to the results in our investment in Cresca (compared
to a gain of R$14.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2018). See “Item 4—Information on the Company—B. Business
Overview—Cresca”.
Financial
income (expenses), net
Financial
income increased R$181.2 million from R$129.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2018 to R$310.5 million for the year ended June
30, 2019 and financial expenses increased R$159.7 million from R$137.9 million for the year ended June 30, 2018 to R$297.6 million
for the year ended June 30, 2019. The variation in financial income (expenses), net is mainly attributable to:
|
i.
|
The increase in
the gain on remeasurement of receivables from the sale of farms and machinery from R$39.3 million for the year ended June
30, 2018 to R$173.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2019 and the increase in the loss on remeasurement of receivables
from the sale of farms and machinery from R$26.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2018 to R$161.5 million for the year
ended June 30, 2019, which related mainly to the adjustment to the present value of such receivables. The net gain on remeasurement
of receivables from the sale of farms and machinery of R$11.5 million was due to the variation in the amount to be received
due to the sales of the Araucária, Alto Taquari and Jatobá Farms, totaling 3.4 million soybean bags. This variation
is explained by the soybean price index, considering the Chicago Stock Exchange (CBOT), port premium (basis), exchange rate
and interest rate (with reference to the CDI).
|
|
ii.
|
The increase in
foreign exchange income from R$12.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2018 to R$17.1 million for the year ended June 30,
2019 and the increase in foreign exchange expenses from R$11.8 million for the year ended June 30, 2018 to R$17.7 million
for the year ended June 30, 2019, which resulted in a net loss of R$614.0 thousand for the year ended June 30, 2019.
|
|
iii.
|
The increase of
R$51.3 million of realized and unrealized gains on derivatives transactions from R$62.9 million for the year ended June 30,
2018 to R$114.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2019 and the increase of R$30.3 million of realized and unrealized losses
on derivatives transactions from R$68.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2018 to R$98.6 million for the year ended June
30, 2019. For the year ended June 30, 2019, the net result of derivative transactions was a gain of R$15.7 million, of which
R$10.1 million is related to currency operations and R$5.6 million gain is related to operations with commodities. For the
year ended June 30, 2018, derivative operations totaled R$5.3 million loss, of which R$17.8 million are a loss related to
currency operations and R$12.5 million gain are in operations with commodities. The derivatives result reflects the commodities
hedge operations results and the impact of the exchange variation on cash, which was partially dollarized in order to maintain
purchasing power with regard to inputs, investments and new acquisitions, which have a positive correlation with the U.S.
dollar.
|
|
iv.
|
The decrease in
interest on marketable securities and receivables from R$14.8 million for the year ended June 30, 2018 to R$6.1 million for
the year ended June 30, 2019.
|
|
v.
|
The decrease in
interest on marketable securities expenses from R$1.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2018 to R$294 thousand for the year
ended June 30, 2019 in connection with the decrease of the total amount of long-term loans and financing for farm development.
|
Income
and social contribution taxes
We
recognized income and social contribution tax expenses of R$22.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2019 and of R$25.9 million
for the year ended June 30, 2018. Current income and social contribution tax expenses increased from R$4.9 million for the year
ended June 30, 2018 to R$10.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2019. Deferred income and social contribution tax expenses decreased
from R$21.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2018 to R$12.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2019.
Profit
for the year
As
a result of the above, profit for the year ended June 30, 2019 increased to R$177.1 million, compared to R$126.3 million for the
year ended June 30, 2018.
|
B.
|
Liquidity and
Capital Resources
|
As
of June 30, 2020, we held R$171.0 million in cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities. We usually hold cash and cash
equivalents in Certificate of Deposits and Repurchase Agreements issued by banks rated at least AA by Moody’s and Brazilian
and American treasury bonds. Of the total amount of cash and cash equivalents, approximately R$27.7 million was held in jurisdictions
outside Brazil and as a result there may be tax consequences if such amounts were moved out of these jurisdictions or repatriated
to Brazil. We regularly review the amount of cash and cash equivalents held outside of Brazil to determine the amounts necessary
to fund the current operations of our foreign operations and their growth initiatives and amounts needed to service our Brazilian
indebtedness and related obligations.
Throughout
the year, our working capital needs vary significantly depending on the harvest period of grains, sugarcane and other crops in
Brazil.
See
“Item 4—Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Seasonality.”
We
believe that our current capital resources, together with our ability to obtain loans and credit facilities and, when appropriate,
to raise equity in the capital markets, are sufficient to meet our present cash flow needs.
Sources
and Uses of Funds
We
finance our investments both by using our own resources as well as through loans and credit facilities with development banks
and governmental development agencies, under which interest rates are lower than market rates, due to the fact that such credit
facilities have long-term characteristics. Our principal sources of financing are discussed below under the heading “Indebtedness
and cash and cash equivalents” and our main uses of funds include acquisition of land, cultivation of sugarcane, improvements
and acquisition of machinery and vehicles.
The
investments made in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020 totaled R$24.6 million, all of which were used for the development of
land for cultivation of grains, sugarcane and pasture.
Cash
Flows
Our
cash flow generation from operating activities may vary from period to period depending on fluctuations in our sales and service
revenue, costs of goods sold and operating income (expenses) and may also vary within such periods as a result of seasonality.
Operating activities primarily refer to revenue generated from the sale of grains and sugarcane.
Investing
activities primarily refer to the acquisition of agricultural properties, developing of such properties for cultivation, purchasing
machines, and remodeling, construction and improvements to agricultural properties and sale of farms.
Financing
activities primarily refer to loans and credit facilities, principally from development banks, for the development of new projects
and the purchase of machines and equipment.
The
table below presents our cash flows for the periods indicated.
|
|
Year
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
(in
R$ thousands)
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
CASH FLOW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash flows (used in) from operating activities
|
|
|
69,024
|
|
|
|
51,338
|
|
|
|
(2,264
|
)
|
Net
cash flows (used in) from investment activities
|
|
|
(29,295
|
)
|
|
|
21,266
|
|
|
|
(65,700
|
)
|
Net
cash flows from (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
18,451
|
|
|
|
(27,621
|
)
|
|
|
125,414
|
|
Net
change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
58,180
|
|
|
|
2,451
|
|
|
|
57,450
|
|
Years
ended June 30, 2020 and 2019
Operating
activities: Net cash generated from operating activities was R$69.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2020 compared to R$51.3
million for the year ended June 30, 2019. This increase was primarily due to: (i) adjustments to reconcile profit for the year
in the amount of R$160.4 million related to the adjustment of the fair value of biological assets and unrealized agricultural
products in the year ended June 30, 2020, compared to R$56.7 million in the year ended June 30, 2019; (ii) adjustments to reconcile
the profit for the year in the amount of R$57.3 million related to the variation in the fair value of accounts receivable for
the sale of farms and other financial liabilities, compared to R$14.0 million in the year ended June 30, 2019; (iii) an increase
in cash flows from biological assets and agricultural products in the amount of R$114.0 million in the year ended June 30, 2020,
compared to an increase in the amount of R$3.5 million in the year ended June 30, 2019; and (iv) an increase in the amount
of R$50.7 million in cash flow from customers in the year ended June 30, 2020, due to the increase in yields and improvement in
sales prices, with a positive impact on trade accounts receivable and receivables from sales of farms, compared to an increase
in the amount of R$3.4 million in the year ended June 30, 2019, which were offset by (i) a decrease in the amount of R$35.7 million
in cash flow from suppliers in the year ended June 30, 2020, related to higher operating expenses due to the increase in operations,
compared to an increase in the amount of R$10.0 million in the year ended June 30, 2019; and (ii) a decrease in the amount of
R$42.7 million with regard to leases payable due to the impact of the implementation of IFRS 16 – Leases.
Investing
activities: Net cash used in investing activities was R$29.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2020 compared to net cash
from investment activities of R$65.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2019. This variation was mainly due to: (i) additions
to investment properties in the amount of R$8.0 million related to the partial payment of the Serra Grande farm acquisition; and
(ii) R$16.0 million related to the opening (cleaning and preparation of the soil to plant) of new crop areas at the Moroti and
Chaparral farms.
Financing
activities: Net cash from financing activities was R$18.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2020 compared to net cash used
in financing activities of R$27.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2019. This variation was mainly due to: (i) new loans in
the aggregate amount of R$143.9 million, of which R$130.0 million were used to pay Agrifirma’s debt; (ii) the payment of
an aggregate amount of R$57.9 million in loans entered into to finance the 2020 harvest and sugarcane invesments; and (iii) the
payment of R$50 million in dividends on November 14, 2019, as approved by the annual shareholders’ meeting held on October
16, 2019.
Years
ended June 30, 2019 and 2018
Operating
activities: Net cash generated from operating activities was R$51.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2019 compared to net
cash used in operating activities of R$2.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2018. This change was primarily due to: (i) R$30.6
million adjustment to reconcile profit for the year related to currency translation adjustment recycled to the statement of income
in connection with the process of re-distributing the assets and liabilities of a joint venture (Cresca) for the year ended June
30, 2018, which did not occour in the year ended June 30, 2019; (ii) an increase in cash flows from transactions with derivative
financial instruments from cash used of R$17.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2018 to cash generated of R$19.3 million for
the year ended June 30, 2019; (iii) a decrease in cash flows from changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural
products from cash used of R$99.1 millhon for the year ended June 30, 2018 to cash used of R$56.7 million for the year ended June
30, 2019; and (iv) a decrease in cash flows from inventories from cash used of R$58.4 millhon for the year ended June 30, 2018
to cash used of R$31.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2019, which was partially offset by an increase of R$103.0 in cash
used in gain on sale of farms.
Investing
activities: Net cash from investing activities was R$21.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2019 compared to net cash used
in investing activities of R$65.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2018. This variation was mainly due to an investment of
R$21.7 million in marketable securities and R$28.9 million of cash received from sales of farms.
Financing
activities: Net cash used in financing activities was R$27.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2019 compared to net cash
from financing activities of R$125.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2018. This variation was mainly due to: (i) a decrease
of R$179.7 million in proceeds from loans, financing and debentures, due to the issuance of Agribusiness Receivables Certificates
(ARC) in the aggregate amount of R$142.2 million in the year ended June 30, 2018; and (ii) an increase in cash used in payment
of dividends from R$13.0 for the year ended June 30, 2018 to R$41.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2019.
Indebtedness
and Cash and Cash Equivalents
Our
total consolidated indebtedness (loans, financing, debentures and leases) was R$514.1 million as of June 30, 2020, compared to
R$285,9 million as of June 30, 2019. Our short-term indebtedness as of June 30, 2020 amounted to R$217.3 million, compared to
R$76.6 million as of June 30, 2019. Our long- term indebtedness as of June 30, 2020 was R$296.2 million, compared to R$209.2 million
on June 30, 2019. Of the total indebtedness outstanding as of June 30, 2020, 57.7% consisted of long-term debt, compared to 73.2%
as of June 30, 2019.
Our
indebtedness is primarily comprised of loans and credit facilities with development banks and government agencies, by means of
direct or indirect disbursements, and acquisitions payable with regard to our agricultural properties. Interest rates are generally
lower than prevailing rates in Brazil, due to the fact that these credit facilities have long-term characteristics and other terms
specific to the development agencies.
In
addition, on May 25, 2018, 142,200 first issue debentures were subscribed and paid-in, not convertible into shares, to be converted
into collateral, in two series, for private placement totaling R$142.2 million, of which R$85.2 million in the first series and
R$57.0 million in the second series. The debentures were tied to a securitization transaction, used as guarantee for the issue
of 142,200 Certificates of Agribusiness Receivables. The first series will mature on August 1, 2022, subject to interest corresponding
to 106.5% of the DI Rate, and the second series will mature on July 31, 2023, subject to interest corresponding to 110.0% of the
DI Rate.
The
debentures contain certain financial covenants related to the maintenance of certain financial ratios, based on the ratio of net
debt to fair value of investment properties. Failure by the Company to maintain these ratios for the period of time during which
the debentures remain outstanding may lead to the acceleration of the debt. On June 30, 2020 and as of the date of this annual
report, we were in compliance with these covenants.
All
loans and financing agreements listed below are in reais and have specific terms and conditions defined in the respective
contracts with governmental economic and development agencies (including the Brazilian Development Bank – BNDES and the
Northeastern Development Bank – BNB) that directly or indirectly grant those loans.
The
table below summarizes our material outstanding loans and financing agreements as of June 30, 2020.
|
|
|
|
Annual
interest rates and charges - %
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Index
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
Financing
for agricultural costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate + CDI
|
|
|
1.80% + 100
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
40,568
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6,293
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate
|
|
|
3.90
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
9,072
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate
|
|
|
6.30
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
108,057
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate
|
|
|
6.34
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,251
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6.14
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
32,295
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate
|
|
|
7.64
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
9,076
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,024
|
|
|
|
38,588
|
|
Financing
for agricultural costs (USD)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,787
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,573
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,360
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Financing
for agricultural costs (Paraguayan guarani)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7,940
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate
|
|
|
8.25
|
%
|
|
|
8.25
|
%
|
|
|
19,749
|
|
|
|
18,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,689
|
|
|
|
18,364
|
|
Bahia
Project Financing(*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
|
|
10,023
|
|
|
|
9,612
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,668
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate
|
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate
|
|
|
7.50
|
%
|
|
|
7.50
|
%
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
9.00
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,254
|
|
|
|
28,534
|
|
Financing
of working capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate + CDI
|
|
|
2%
+ 100
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
77,516
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,516
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Financing
of Machinery and Equipment – FINAME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate
|
|
|
7.22
|
%
|
|
|
7.22
|
%
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate + TJLP
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3.73
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,204
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10.50
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
5,542
|
|
Financing
of sugarcane
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate
|
|
|
6.76
|
%
|
|
|
6.76
|
%
|
|
|
2,447
|
|
|
|
2,863
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate
|
|
|
6.14
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
40,857
|
|
|
|
27,580
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate
|
|
|
6.34
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
29,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate + TJLP
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3.80
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10,948
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,290
|
|
|
|
43,482
|
|
Debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDI
|
|
|
106.50
|
%
|
|
|
106.50
|
%
|
|
|
88,884
|
|
|
|
91,518
|
|
|
|
CDI
|
|
|
110.00
|
%
|
|
|
110.00
|
%
|
|
|
59,548
|
|
|
|
61,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,432
|
|
|
|
152,889
|
|
(-)
Transaction costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,682
|
)
|
|
|
(1,546
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
514,113
|
|
|
|
285,853
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,274
|
|
|
|
76,608
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296,839
|
|
|
|
209,245
|
|
(*)
Financing to raise funds for opening of crop areas and improvements at the Jatobá and Chaparral farms.
Changes
in loans and financing during the year ended June 30, 2020 as follows:
|
|
2019
|
|
|
Acquisition
Agrifirma
|
|
|
Contracting
|
|
|
Payment
of Principal
|
|
|
Payment
of Interest
|
|
|
Appropriation
of Interest
|
|
|
Foreign
Exchange Variation
|
|
|
Total
as of
June 30,
2020
|
|
Agricultural
Cost Financing (reais)
|
|
|
38,588
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
166,346
|
|
|
|
(38,185
|
)
|
|
|
(1,848
|
)
|
|
|
5,123
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
170,024
|
|
Agricultural
Cost Financing (Paraguayan guarani)
|
|
|
18,364
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
14,181
|
|
|
|
(4,017
|
)
|
|
|
(1,020
|
)
|
|
|
2,007
|
|
|
|
6,534
|
|
|
|
36,049
|
|
Bahia
Project Financing(*)
|
|
|
28,534
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(16,953
|
)
|
|
|
(2,864
|
)
|
|
|
1,537
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10,254
|
|
Working
Capital Financing
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
123,862
|
|
|
|
77,000
|
|
|
|
(63,777
|
)
|
|
|
(65,980
|
)
|
|
|
3,369
|
|
|
|
3,042
|
|
|
|
77,516
|
|
Financing
of Machinery and Equipment – FINAME
|
|
|
5,542
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(5,346
|
)
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
Sugarcane
Financing
|
|
|
43,482
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
43,482
|
|
|
|
(15,689
|
)
|
|
|
(2,194
|
)
|
|
|
4,208
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
73,290
|
|
Debentures
|
|
|
152,889
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(11,626
|
)
|
|
|
7,169
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
148,432
|
|
Transaction
costs
|
|
|
(1,546
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,682
|
)
|
|
|
|
285,853
|
|
|
|
123,862
|
|
|
|
301,009
|
|
|
|
(143,967
|
)
|
|
|
(86,013
|
)
|
|
|
23,710
|
|
|
|
9,659
|
|
|
|
514,113
|
|
(*)
Financing to raise funds for opening of crop areas and improvements at the Jatobá and Chaparral farms.
Capital
Expenditures
We
are focused on the acquisition, development and exploration of agricultural properties and the acquisition and development of
properties that we believe have significant potential for cash flow generation and value appreciation. Our total capital expenditures
related to these assets for the year ended June 30, 2020 were R$24.6 million, of which R$16.0 million refer to construction in
progress, mostly for the clearance of areas and R$8.5 million refer to the opening and preparation of areas for cultivation and
buildings and for improvements of the farm facilities.
All
of our capital expenditures to date have been made as planned and according to the normal course of our operations. Our capital
expenditures have not had any material impact from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Equity
Our
total equity excluding non-controlling interest amounted to R$1,121.6 million as of June 30, 2020 and R$880.5 million as of June
30, 2019.
|
C.
|
Research and
Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.
|
We
do not currently have research and development policies and have not incurred research and development expenditures in prior years.
We
expect to continue to operate in a highly competitive and regulated environment that will pose continued risks and threats to
our existing businesses, placing the profitability of our assets under pressure. We expect our business to continue to be subject
to the risks and uncertainties discussed in “Item 3—Key Information—Risk Factors.”
According
to a report released in September 2020 by the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”), the soybean global
production is forecasted at a record 369.7 million tons for the 2020/21 crop year, and Brazil’s production estimate was
raised to a record 133.0 million tons. Brazilian soybean producers have already sold almost 60% of expected production at higher
prices due to the weaker Brazilian real and stronger Chinese demand.
In
addition to the information set forth in this section, additional information about the trends affecting our business can be found
in “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Operating Results—Business Drivers and Measures.”
We
are not aware of any other trends, uncertainties, demands, commitments or events that are reasonably likely to have a material
effect on our net sales or revenues, income from continuing operations, profitability, liquidity or capital resources, or that
would cause reported financial information to not necessarily be indicative of future operating results or financial condition.
For
a description of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on our results of operations, see “—Operating Results—Impact
of the COVID-19 Pandemic.”
|
E.
|
Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
|
We
do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial
condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital
resources that are material to investors.
|
F.
|
Tabular Disclosure
of Contractual Obligations
|
The
following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations and commitments as of June 30, 2020:
|
|
Maturities
per period
|
|
|
|
Less
than
One Year
|
|
|
One
to Two
Years
|
|
|
Three to Five
Years
|
|
|
More
than
Five Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(in
R$ thousands)
|
|
Trade
accounts payable
|
|
|
55,603
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
55,603
|
|
Derivative
financial instruments
|
|
|
18,333
|
|
|
|
1,462
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
19,795
|
|
Loans,
financing, debentures and finance leases(1)
|
|
|
217,274
|
|
|
|
198,793
|
|
|
|
82,037
|
|
|
|
16,009
|
|
|
|
514,113
|
|
Lease
payables
|
|
|
25,849
|
|
|
|
26,200
|
|
|
|
45,330
|
|
|
|
54,984
|
|
|
|
152,363
|
|
Transactions
with related parties(2)
|
|
|
2,849
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,849
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
|
|
5,017
|
|
|
|
29,777
|
|
|
|
4,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,391
|
|
|
(1)
|
Interest
on variable interest rate loans and financing has been computed considering the interest
rate as of June 30, 2020. See “Indebtedness and Cash and Cash Equivalents.”
|
|
(2)
|
See
“Item 7—B. Related Party Transactions.”
|
On
May 8, 2015, we executed three agreements with Brenco:
The
first agreement consists of a rural sub partnership to operate nine farms located in the municipalities of Alto Araguaia and Alto
Taquari, in the state of Mato Grosso. The sub partnership started at the date of its signature and is estimated to end on March
31, 2026. The areas are to be used for the plantation and cultivation of sugarcane, which cannot exceed the duration of the contract.
This contractual partnership meets the definition of an operating lease. The payment must always be in kind (tons of sugarcane)
and delivered at the mill owned by Brenco, which is located in the vicinity of the farms, during the harvest period of the product.
The quantity to be paid for the duration of the contract shall be established in tons per hectare and varies according to the
area being explored. According to this contract, the quantity to be paid in the long term corresponds to 529,975 tons of sugarcane,
of which 174,929 tons will be paid within one to five years and 355,046 tons will be paid over five years up to the expiration
of the agreement.
The
second agreement relates to the regulation of rights and obligations between agricultural partners from whom BrasilAgro acquired
the crops of sugarcane planted by Brenco in the properties subject to the sub partnership agreement described above. This contract
meets the definition of a financial lease. The payment must always be in kind (tons of sugarcane) and delivered at the mill owned
by Brenco during the harvest period of the product. According to this contract, the quantity to be paid in the long term corresponds
to 53,845 tons of sugarcane, of which 18,604 tons will be paid within one year and 35,241 tons will be paid within one to five
years.
The
third agreement regulates the exclusive supply to Brenco of the total sugarcane production in the properties included in the sub
partnership agreement for two crop cycles, one cycle shall be effective until the depletion of the already existing sugarcane
crops and the other cycle consists of the sugarcane being planted by BrasilAgro.
On
February 7, 2017, we entered into two agreements for an agricultural partnership in relation to a property in São Raimundo
das Mangabeiras, state of Maranhão, or Partnership IV.
The
first agreement under Partnership IV establishes an agricultural partnership with Agro Pecuária e Industrial Serra Grande
Ltda. (“Serra Grande”), which consists of a sugarcane exploration agreement of an area of around 15,000 hectares.
The agricultural partnership will last for 15 years from the date of the agreement and may be extended for the same period. The
amount to be paid to Serra Grande corresponds to 10% of the entire production obtained in the area referred to in the agreement
and the initial volume to be produced in the area during the first year of the agreement was established at 850,000 tons. After
this period, spanning between one and five years, the minimum volume to be produced in the partnership areas is 4,500,000 tons
of sugarcane, and from the sixth year onward until the expiration of the agreement, the minimum production volume is 1,250,000
tons of sugarcane per crop year.
The
second agreement under Partnership IV governs the rights and obligations of the agricultural partners, through which BrasilAgro
acquired sugarcane crops planted by the agricultural partner in the areas referred to in the partnership agreement described above.
This agreement meets the definition of a finance lease. As consideration, BrasilAgro undertakes to return, at the end of the agreement,
the area referred to in the partnership agreement together with sugarcane stubble crops with the capacity to produce 850,000 tons
of sugarcane in the crop year subsequent to the termination of the agricultural partnership agreement.
See
“Forward-Looking Statements.”
ITEM
6—DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
A.
|
Directors
and Senior Management Board of Directors
|
Our
board of directors is responsible for establishing our overall business plan, guidelines and policies, including our long-term
strategy, and for overseeing our performance. Our board of directors is also responsible for the supervision of our executive
officers.
Pursuant
to our bylaws, our board of directors consists of a minimum of five and a maximum of nine members. Election of our directors is
made at annual shareholders’ meetings. At the date of this annual report, five of our directors, namely Eduardo Elsztain,
Alejandro G. Elsztain, Saul Zang, Carlos María Blousson and Alejandro Casaretto were nominated by our controlling shareholder
Cresud. The members of our board are elected at the shareholders’ meeting for a term of approximately two years, reelection
being permitted. A director must remain in office until replaced by a successor unless resolved otherwise at the shareholders’
meeting or by the board of directors.
Under
Novo Mercado regulations and our bylaws, a minimum of 20% of the members of our board of directors must be independent
(as such term is defined under Novo Mercado regulations). However, three directors must be independent if nine members
are elected to our board. Prior to taking office, our board members are required to sign an agreement to comply with the Novo
Mercado regulation.
Pursuant
to section 19 of our bylaws, our board of directors holds mandatory meetings six times a year, and may hold extraordinary meetings,
as necessary. Meetings of our board of directors are convened only if a majority of the directors are present and all board decisions
are taken by a 2/3 or 3/4 majority, or by simple majority, depending on the nature of the specific matters brought to discussion.
Brazilian
corporate law and CVM Regulation No. 282/98 allow the adoption of a cumulative vote process by the request of shareholders representing
a minimum of 5% of our capital stock. Brazilian corporate law allows minority shareholders that, individually or as a group, hold
at least 15% of our common shares to appoint one director, by means of a separate vote. Brazilian corporate law does not allow
for the election of a member to our board of directors, unless waived by our shareholders, if that person is an employee or senior
manager of one of our competitors or has an interest conflicting with ours.
Our
board of directors is currently comprised of nine members, all of whom were elected at the general shareholders’ meeting
held on October 16, 2019, and whose terms will expire at our annual shareholders’ meeting for the approval of our financial
statements for the fiscal year to end on June 30, 2021. The table below sets forth the name, title and date of election of each
current member of our board of directors:
Directors*
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
of election
|
|
Age
|
Eduardo
S. Elsztain
|
|
Chairman
|
|
October
16, 2019
|
|
60
|
Alejandro G. Elsztain
|
|
Director
|
|
October 16, 2019
|
|
54
|
Saul Zang
|
|
Director
|
|
October 16, 2019
|
|
74
|
Isaac Selim Sutton
|
|
Independent Director**
|
|
October 16, 2019
|
|
60
|
Carlos María
Blousson
|
|
Director
|
|
October 16, 2019
|
|
57
|
Alejandro Casaretto
|
|
Director
|
|
October 16, 2019
|
|
69
|
João de Almeida
Sampaio Filho
|
|
Independent Director**
|
|
October 16, 2019
|
|
55
|
Bruno Magalhães
|
|
Independent Director**
|
|
October 16, 2019
|
|
47
|
Camilo Marcantonio
|
|
Independent Director**
|
|
October 16, 2019
|
|
39
|
|
*
|
Ms.
Carolina Zang and Mr. Gastón Armando Lernoud were elected to the positions of
first and second alternate members of our Board of Directors, solely in the case of a
vacancy in the position of a Non-Independent member of the Board of Directors. Mr. Ricardo
de Santos Freitas was elected to the position of first alternate member of our Board
of Directors, in the exclusive case of vacancy of the position of Independent Member
of our Board of Directors.
|
|
**
|
Independent
director as defined under the Novo Mercado regulations.
|
Below
is a brief biographical description of each member of our board of directors:
Eduardo
S. Elsztain. Mr. Elsztain has been engaged in the real estate business for more than twenty-five years. He is the
chairman of the board of directors of Cresud SACIFyA, IRSA Propiedades Comerciales S.A., IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad
Anónima, IDB Development Corporation Ltd., Discount Investment Corporation Ltd., Banco Hipotecario S.A., BrasilAgro Companhia
Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas S.A., Austral Gold Ltd., and Consultores Assets Management S.A., among other companies.
He also Chairs IRSA Foundation, is a member of the World Economic Forum, the Council of the Americas, the Group of 50 and the
Argentine Business Association (AEA), among others. He is co-founder of Endeavor Argentina and serves as Vice-President of the
World Jewish Congress. Mr. Eduardo Sergio Elsztain is a brother of Alejandro Gustavo Elsztain.
Alejandro
G. Elsztain. Mr. Elsztain obtained a degree in agricultural engineering from Universidad de Buenos Aires. He is currently
Second Vice-Chairman of Cresud SACIFyA, Executive Vice-Chairman of IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima,
Chairman at Fibesa S.A. and Vice-Chairman at Nuevas Fronteras S.A. and Hoteles Argentinos S.A. In addition, he is Chairman of
the Israeli companies Gav Yam and Mehadrin and Vice-Chairman of Property & Building Corporation Ltd. He is also a Director
at IDB Development Corporation Ltd., and BrasilAgro Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas S.A., among other companies.
He is also Chairman of Hillel Foundation Argentina. Mr. Alejandro Gustavo Elsztain is a brother of Eduardo Sergio Elsztain.
Saul
Zang. Mr. Zang obtained a law degree from the Universidad de Buenos Aires. He is a member of the International Bar
Association and of the Interamerican Federation of Lawyers. He was a founding partner of Zang, Bergel & Viñes Law Firm.
Mr. Zang is Vice-chairman of Cresud SACIFyA, IRSA Propiedades Comerciales S.A., Consultores Assets Management S.A., and Fibesa
S.A., among other companies, and Chairman at Puerto Retiro S.A. He is also director of IDB Development Corporation Ltd., Discount
Investment Corporation Ltd., Banco Hipotecario S.A., BrasilAgro Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas S.A., BACS
Banco de Crédito & Securitización S.A., Nuevas Fronteras S.A., and Palermo Invest S.A., among other companies.
Isaac
Selim Sutton. Mr. Sutton holds a degree in economics from the Universidade de São Paulo (USP). He was an executive
officer at the Safra Group’s holding company from 1994 to 2009. He is currently a member of the Fiscal Council of Bardella
S.A. Indústrias Mecânicas. He has also served on the boards of directors of Bardella S.A., DPVAT S.A., Telenorte
Celular, TIM Participações S.A., Veracel Celulose S.A., BR Properties S.A., Gevisa S.A. and Celma S.A., and on the
fiscal councils of TIM Sul, Têxtil Renaux and TIM Nordeste.
Carlos
María Blousson. Mr. Blousson obtained a degree in agricultural engineering from Universidad de Buenos Aires.
He has been the Chief Sales Officer of Cresud SACIFyA since 1996. Prior to joining Cresud SACIFyA, he worked as a futures and
options operator at Vanexva Bursátil – Sociedad de Bolsa. Previously, he worked as a farmland manager and a technical
advisor at Leucon S.A.
Alejandro
Gustavo Casaretto. Mr. Casaretto obtained a degree in agricultural engineering from Universidad de Buenos Aires. He
has served as a technical manager, farm manager, and technical coordinator at Cresud SACIFyA since 1975.
João
de Almeida Sampaio Filho. Mr. Sampaio Filho holds a degree in economics from the Fundação Armando Álvares
Penteado (FAAP) and is an agricultural producer in the states of Paraná, São Paulo and Mato Grosso. He was the President
of the National Natural Rubber Commission of the Brazilian Confederation of Agriculture and Livestock (CNA) and President of the
National Natural Rubber Sector Chamber. He was a member of the National Council of Agricultural Policy and the National Agricultural
Academy. Mr. Sampaio was the President of the Brazilian Farmers’ Association (SRB) between 2002 and 2007, President of FARM
– Mercosul’s Federation of Rural Associations and the São Paulo State Secretary for Agriculture and Supply
between 2007 and 2011. He is currently a Member of Advisory and Managing Boards of companies in Brazil and the United States,
Minerva S.A.’s Chief Officer of Institutional Relations and Chairman of FIESP Agribusiness Higher Council.
Bruno
Magalhães. Mr. Magalhães has 22 years of experience in financial markets. Mr. Magalhães joined
Autonomy Capital in Brazil in 2013 as a trader for the Global Macro Fund. Prior to joining Autonomy, Mr. Magalhães was
a partner at Banco Brasil Plural. From 2001 to 2011, he was based in London, acting as a managing director at Standard Bank, and
prior to that, for Unibanco. Bruno holds an MBA degree from IBMEC Rio, and a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering
from the Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC/RJ).
Camilo
Marcantonio. Mr. Marcantonio is a co-founder and portfolio manager at Charles River Capital, an asset management company.
Previously, he was a strategic consultant at Bain & Company for eight years, where he worked on projects addressing strategic
planning, post-merger integration, complexity management, organization, performance improvement, and supply chain management,
among other areas. Mr. Marcantonio had also been a partner at Astor Group, an independent investment bank and strategic advisory
firm, where he advised clients on developing strategies, identifying and executing mergers and acquisitions, raising capital and
solving financial and operational challenges. Mr. Marcantonio holds a degree in electronics engineering from the Instituto Militar
de Engenharia (IME), from which he received the Correia Lima medal for graduating first in his class, and an MBA degree with distinction
from Harvard Business School, where he received the John L. Loeb award for outstanding record of academic achievement in the area
of finance.
Board
Committees
Pursuant
to our bylaws, our board of directors shall elect among its members three directors to compose the Compensation Committee and
a minimum of three and a maximum of four directors to compose the Executive Committee. In addition to these two statutory committees,
our board of directors may establish other technical or advisory committees for a specific purpose and with specific duties, which
members may or may not include our directors or executive officers. Our board of directors shall establish the rules applicable
to these committees, including rules on their composition, term of office, compensation and operation. Such committees are advisory
and non-deliberative in nature. The following advisory committees are currently established and active:
Compensation
Committee
The
Compensation Committee was established on March 1, 2012, and is composed of the following members of our board of directors, all
elected on October 23, 2019 for a term of office of two years, which will end at the annual general meeting for approval of our
financial statements for the fiscal year to end on June 30, 2021: (i) Alejandro G. Elsztain, (ii) Saul Zang and (iii) Isaac Selim
Sutton. In accordance with our bylaws, the Compensation Committee performs consultative assistance to the Board of Directors,
including with respect to the determination of the compensation and benefits to be received by our directors and executive officers.
Its activities include (i) submitting proposals to the Board of Directors with respect to director and executive officer compensation,
(ii) advising the Board of Directors with respect to the granting of stock options or subscription warrants to our officers and
employees, and (iii) advising the Board of Directors with respect to profit sharing plans involving our executive officers and
employees.
Executive
Committee
The
Executive Committee was established on December 13, 2011, and is composed of the following members of our board of directors,
all elected on October 23, 2019 for a term of office of two years, which will end at the annual general meeting for approval of
our financial statements for the fiscal year to end on June 30, 2021: (i) Eduardo S. Elsztain, (ii) Alejandro G. Elsztain and
(iii) Saul Zang. In accordance with our bylaws, the Executive Committee performs consultative assistance to the Board of Directors
with respect to its role as a supervisory body, advising the Board of Directors on, or periodically reviewing, certain strategic
or financial aspects of our business. Its activities include (A) advising the Board of Directors with respect to (i) our business
plan, (ii) changes to our authorized capital, (iii) strategic initiatives, our growth plan and investment initiatives and (iv)
any investments or dispositions over R$700 thousand; (B) reviewing annually (i) our financing initiatives, including with respect
to our securities, (ii) the financial implications of our financing strategy and (iii) our dividend policy; and (C) reviewing
and supervising periodically (i) the necessary financing for investments or activities in excess of R$700 thousand and (ii) our
accessing of the capital markets.
Executive
Officers
Pursuant
to our bylaws, we must have two to six executive officers who may or may not be shareholders. Our executive officers are elected
by our board of directors. We currently have two executive officers, who hold the following titles: chief executive officer and
chief operating officer, and chief administrative officer and investor relations officer. Our executive officers are elected for
a one-year term with the possibility of reelection, and they are required to remain in office until the election of their successors.
Under Novo Mercado regulation, our executive officers are also required to sign an agreement to comply with the rules of
the Novo Mercado prior to taking office.
Our
executive officers are our legal representatives and are responsible for our day-to-day management, implementation of the policies
and directives set by our board of directors and other duties assigned to them under the law and our bylaws. Our executive officers
are authorized to take all actions required for the operation of our business, unless the law or our bylaws specifically delegate
such authority to the shareholders’ meeting or our board of directors.
The
table below indicates the name, title, date of election and term of office of each of our current executive officers:
Executive
Officers
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
of most recent election
|
|
End
of term of current office
|
|
Age
|
André Guillaumon
|
|
Chief executive officer and
Chief operating officer
|
|
October 21, 2020
|
|
October 2021
|
|
46
|
Gustavo Javier Lopez
|
|
Chief administrative officer and Investor relations
officer
|
|
October 21, 2020
|
|
October 2021
|
|
53
|
At
a Board Meeting held on October 21, 2020, André Guillaumon and Gustavo Javier Lopez were re-elected as Chief Executive
Officer and Investor Relations Officer, respectively, with a term of office of one year until the first meeting of the Board of
Directors to be held after the annual general meeting for approval of our financial statements for the fiscal year to end on June
30, 2021 or until they are dismissed or replaced by the Board of Directors.
Below
is a brief biographical description of our executive officers:
André
Guillaumon. Mr. Guillaumon holds a bachelor’s degree in Agricultural Engineering from the Escola Superior de
Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz (ESALQ) of the Universidade de São Paulo in Piracicaba, Brazil. In 1996, he began his career
at Fertibrás S.A., where he worked directly in preparing and implementing fertilizer production and sales strategies. Mr.
Guillaumon also represented Fertibrás S.A. in technical forums, such as the 25th International Fertilizer Management Seminar
(Chicago, USA) and at the Fertilizer Quality Commission (ANDA). Mr. Guillaumon joined our Company in August 2007 as our Chief
operating officer. He became our Chief executive officer and Chief operating officer in August 2016.
Gustavo
Javier Lopez. Mr. Lopez joined Cresud in 1999 as budget manager. Since 2004, he has served as budget manager of IRSA.
Prior to joining IRSA, Mr. Lopez also worked for the Argentine company Estancias Unidas del Sud as its budget analyst and as accountant
for Loma Negra. He received an accounting degree from the Universidad de Buenos Aires. Mr. Lopez joined our Company in 2005 as
our Chief administrative officer. He became our Chief administrative officer and Investor relations officer in August 2016.
Agreements
with our Directors and Executive Officers
We
are not party to any agreement or obligations involving the members of our board of directors and our executive officers.
Family
Relationship among our Directors and Officers
Eduardo
S. Elsztain, the chairman of our board of directors, and Alejandro G. Elsztain, a member of our board of directors, are brothers.
Saul
Zang, who is a member of our board of directors, is Carolina Zang’s father.
Pursuant
to our bylaws, the total amount of compensation paid to the members of our board of directors, fiscal council and executive officers,
in the aggregate, is set annually at the general shareholders’ meeting. Our directors, pursuant to the recommendation of
the compensation committee, allocate the aggregate compensation among our executive officers and directors. Although our executive
officers and board of directors are entitled to fixed compensation and a bonus depending on individual and company performance,
the compensation of the fiscal council members is fixed. The bonus is paid to our executive officers and directors based on the
achievement of certain individual and company targets.
The
aggregate compensation paid to our executive officers and members of our board of directors (including for service as members
of the compensation committee and executive committee) in the 2020 fiscal year was R$11.9 million, comprised of a fixed amount
of R$3.8 million, a bonus paid to our executive officers and members of our board of directors in the amount of R$7.1 million
and R$1.1 million as share-based compensation paid to our executive officers pursuant to our Long Term Incentive Plan based on
Shares. The bonus to the board or directors was paid based on a recommendation of our compensation committee. The fixed amount
paid to the members of our fiscal council in the 2020 fiscal year was R$0.3 million.
Neither
we nor our subsidiaries have set aside any amount to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits.
Stock
Option Plan
Our
stock option plan was approved on October 29, 2008 for the benefit of the directors, executive officers and selected employees
of our Company and our directly and indirectly controlled entities, and is limited to (2%) of our capital stock, including all
outstanding stock options (vested and unvested). Our board of directors manages our stock option plan and grants stock options
subject to the limits and restrictions of applicable regulation, our by-laws and the guidelines set forth in the shareholders’
meeting that approved it. Our board of directors approved our first grant of stock options under the plan on August 11, 2010,
with options with an exercise price of R$8.97 per share, which vested on August 11, 2012 and could be exercised within three years
thereafter. Our board of directors approved our second grant of stock options under the plan on July 3, 2012, with options with
an exercise price of R$8.25 per share, which vested on July 3, 2012 and may be exercised within five years thereafter. Our board
of directors approved our third grant of stock options under the plan on September 4, 2012, with options with an exercise price
of R$8.52 per share, which vested on September 4, 2014, and may be exercised within three years thereafter. No stock options have
been granted since September 5, 2012. In August 2015, our executive officers exercised stock options granted in the first tranche
representing 233,689 shares of our capital stock, which were delivered to them in October 2015. In September 2017, our executive
officers exercised stock options representing 218,108 shares of our capital stock, representing the remaining stock options granted
from the first, second and third tranches, which were delivered to them on October 2017. As of June 30, 2020, no additional stock
options had been exercised under either the second or third tranches. We do not expect to grant any further stock options under
our stock option plan.
Long
Term Incentive Plan based on Shares
Our
Long-Term Stock-Based Incentive Plan, or the Plan, was approved at the general meeting of our shareholders held on October 2,
2017. Executive officers and other key employees are eligible for the Plan, however, members of the Board of Directors are not
eligible.
In
establishing the Plan, the Company seeks to foster the achievement of the Company’s objectives, to strengthen the participants’
commitment in achieving certain pre-established goals. Since the elected participants receive shares issued by us, this causes
them to aim at improving the results the Company and also results in the appreciation of the price of our common shares, thereby
aligning the employees’ long-term interests with the Company’s. Finally, there is a long-term alignment of interests,
since the vesting period and the potential for valuation of our common shares under the Plan also encourage participants to generate
better long-term results, as well as to remain as employees of the Company. The Plan helps retain key executives and key employees
for a longer period, which is fundamental to the Company’s long-term management and strategies.
The
Long-Term Stock-Based Incentive Program No. 1, or Program No. 1, was established under the Plan and was duly approved at the Board
of Directors meeting held on June 18, 2019. Program No. 1 was approved with the purpose of establishing a share bonus to the participants
of the program to: (i) stimulate the expansion, success and achievement of the Company’s objectives; (ii) encourage participants
to contribute substantially to the Company’s success; (iii) align the interests of the Company’s shareholders with
those of the participants; (iv) provide the Company with a competitive differential in relation to the market with respect to
variable compensation; and (v) encourage the retention of key executives and key employees of the Company. The shares to be granted
under Program No. 1 will only be delivered to the elected participants if and as long as the key performance indicators (KPIs),
the time limits and other conditions described in the program. The maximum potential number of shares that each participant received
varied depending on the dividends declared by the Company during the vesting period of Program No. 1, the position held by each
participant and other applicable conditions. The vesting period of Program No.1 started on October 2, 2017 and ended on October
1, 2019.
For
information about the date of expiration of the current term of office and the period during which each director and executive
officer has served in such office, see “Item 6—Directors, Senior Management and Employees—A. Directors and Senior
Management.”
Neither
we nor any of our subsidiaries have entered into a service contract with any of our directors that provide for benefits upon termination
of employment.
Fiscal
Council
Under
Brazilian corporate law, the Conselho Fiscal, or fiscal council, is a corporate body independent of our management and
our independent auditors. Its primary responsibilities are monitoring management activities, reviewing our financial statements,
and reporting its findings to our shareholders.
Under
an exemption pursuant to Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act regarding the audit committees of listed companies, a fiscal council
may exercise the required duties and responsibilities of a U.S. audit committee to the extent permissible under the Brazilian
corporate law.
To
comply with Rule 10A-3, the fiscal council must meet certain standards, including the following: (i) it must be separate from
the full board of directors; (ii) no executive officer may be a member; and (iii) Brazilian law must set forth standards for the
independence of the members. The fiscal council must also, to the extent permitted by Brazilian law, among other things: (A) be
responsible for establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal
controls or auditing; (B) have the authority to engage independent counsel and other advisors as it deems necessary to carry out
its duties; and (C) receive appropriate funding from the company for payment of compensation to the external auditors and advisors
as well as ordinary administrative expenses.
We
have modified our fiscal council to comply with the exemption requirements. Accordingly, the fiscal council operates pursuant
to its charter (regimento interno), which contemplates the activities described above to the extent permitted by Brazilian
law and is compliant with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the applicable regulations and requirements of the SEC.
Because Brazilian corporate law does not permit the board of directors to delegate responsibility for the appointment and removal
of the external auditors and does not provide the fiscal council with the authority to resolve disagreements between management
and the external auditors regarding financial reporting, the fiscal council cannot perform these functions.
However,
the fiscal council’s charter (regimento interno) provides the fiscal council with the authority to submit recommendations
to the board of directors for the appointment or removal of the external auditors and their compensation.
Pursuant
to our bylaws, our fiscal council is permanent. The fiscal council’s members are elected at the annual shareholders’
meeting with a term of office that extends through the following annual shareholders’ meeting. Our fiscal council shall
be composed of three to five effective members and their alternates, who may or may not be shareholders. All members of our fiscal
council are also required to sign an agreement to comply with the Novo Mercado rules prior to assuming their roles.
In
addition, minority shareholders representing a minimum of 10% of our voting shares are entitled to elect one fiscal council member
and his or her alternate by a separate vote. Our fiscal council must not have members of our board of directors, our executive
officers, or our employees or of any subsidiary or a company under common control with us, or spouses or close family members
of our directors and officers. Brazilian corporate law requires fiscal council members to receive a remuneration of at least 10%
of the average annual amount paid to our officers, which excludes benefits and other allowances, or profit sharing, if any.
Our
fiscal council is currently composed of three members and three alternates.
The
table below indicates the name, title, date of election and term of office of each current member of our fiscal council:
Fiscal
Council Members
|
|
Position
|
|
Date
of Election
|
|
End
of Current Term
|
Fabiano Nunes Ferrari
|
|
Fiscal Council member
|
|
October 16, 2020
|
|
October 16, 2021
|
Ivan Luvisotto Alexandre
|
|
Fiscal Council member
|
|
October 16, 2020
|
|
October 16, 2021
|
Débora de
Souza Morsch
|
|
Fiscal Council member
|
|
October 16, 2020
|
|
October 16, 2021
|
Maurício
Bispo de Souza Dantonio
|
|
Fiscal Council alternate
member
|
|
October 16, 2020
|
|
October 16, 2021
|
Marcos Paulo Passoni
|
|
Fiscal Council alternate
member
|
|
October 16, 2020
|
|
October 16, 2021
|
Ruan Alves Pires
|
|
Fiscal Council alternate
member
|
|
October 16, 2020
|
|
October 16, 2021
|
Below
is a brief biography of each member and alternate member of our fiscal council:
Fabiano
Nunes Ferrari. Mr. Ferrari holds a Law degree from the Catholic University of São Paulo (PUC-SP) and is a partner
at Suchodolski Law Firm, specialized in the fields of Corporate Law, International Law, Foreign Investments, Mergers and Acquisitions
and Contracts and Agreements. In the corporate law area, he has worked in several takeovers, joint ventures and corporate restructurings.
He was formerly a lawyer at the Bryan Cave LLP law firm in New York and is a member of the International Bar Association.
Ivan
Luvisotto Alexandre. Mr. Alexandre holds a Law degree from the University of São Paulo (USP) and a specialist
degree in Accountability applied to Law from the Getúlio Vargas Foundation in São Paulo (FGV-SP), as well as a specialist
degree in Information Technology Law from the Fundação Getúlio Vargas in São Paulo (FGV-SP). He is
a partner at Suchodolski Law Firm, with extensive experience in corporate planning and consultancy, M&As, international agreements
and transactions, having assisted Brazilian and foreign companies in structuring their investments in Brazil or abroad. He has
also been the Legal Director of the Brazil-Israel Chamber of Commerce and Industry since 2010.
Débora
de Souza Morsch. Ms. Morsch graduated in Civil Engineering and Administration from Universidade Federal do Rio Grande
do Sul (UFRGS). Ms. Morsch has a specialist degree in Capital Markets from Associação dos Analistas e Profissionais
de Investimento do Mercado de Capitais (Apimec- UFRGS) and in Construction Management from UFRGS. Ms. Morsch is a partner and
director at Zenith Asset Management and has been a member of the board of Electro Aço Altona S/A.
Maurício
Bispo de Souza Dantonio. Mr. Dantonio holds a law degree from the Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo
(PUC/SP) and a graduate degree in business law from the Getúlio Vargas Foundation. He is a lawyer at Suchodolski Advogados
and practies in the areas of corporate law, contract law and civil litigation.
Marcos
Paulo Passoni. Mr. Passoni holds a Law degree from the Catholic University of São Paulo and a Master degree
in Diffuse Rights from Unimes. He is a partner at Suchodolski Law Firm and specializes in the fields of Civil Law and Litigation.
He was a member of the board of OAB-SP (the Bar Association of the State of São Paulo). He is also a professor of Civil
Litigation Procedure in the Superior School of Advocacy.
Ruan
Alves Pires. Mr. Pires is a partner and analyst at Charles River Capital. He joined Charles River Capital in
2013, where he was the Compliance and Risk Officer, and currently works in the stock analysis area. He holds a degree in mechanical
and automotive engineering from the Military Engineering Institute (IME) in Rio de Janeiro.
For
information about the compensation committee, see “Item 6—Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors
and Senior Management—Board Committees.”
The
table below shows the evolution of the total number of our employees for the period indicated:
|
|
As
of June 30,
|
|
Location
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
Head
Offices/São Paulo
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
Araucária
Farm
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Alto Taquari Farm
(and Partnership III Farm)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Chaparral Farm
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Nova Buriti Farm
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Jatobá Farm
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Preferência
Farm
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Partnership II
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Partnership V
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
São José
Farm (and Partnership IV Farm)
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Arrojadinho Farm
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Serra
Grande Farm (and Partnership VII Farm)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
As
of June 30,
|
|
Location
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
Head
Offices/São Paulo
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
Goiás
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Mato Grosso
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Bahia
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Piauí
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Maranhão
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Minas
Gerais
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Total
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
All
of our employees are located in Brazil, and we do not employ a material number of temporary employees.
Compensation
and benefits
Our
compensation policy for our employees is based on legal and market rates of compensation, as well as merit-based increases in
individual employees’ compensation, based on individual goals set for such employees and administered and monitored by our
human resources department. We are also party to agreements, entered into with unions representing our employees, providing for
employee profit-sharing arrangements (programa de participação nos resultados), pursuant to which all of
our employees receive annual bonuses based on our financial and operating results, as well as personal goals set for individual
employees. Finally, we also seek to retain quality personnel through offering benefits such as health and dental care, life insurance,
meal vouchers, transportation and lodging, as well as job and technical training and subsidies for post-graduate, business administration
and language courses. We also employ security officers at each of our agricultural properties, in an effort to maintain safe working
conditions for employees contracted through our third-party service providers, including through regular workplace safety training
programs.
Relationship
with unions
We
believe we have good relationships with our employees and the unions that represent them. The table below summarizes the agreements
entered into between us and the unions representing our employees as of June 30, 2020.
Branch
Office
|
|
Union
|
|
Agreement(s)
|
|
Agreement
Expiration Date
|
Head Office
|
|
Sindicato dos Trabalhadores Rurais de São
Paulo
|
|
Profit Sharing Program Overtime compensation(1)
|
|
Feb. 1, 2021
|
Chaparral
|
|
Confederação Nacional dos Trabalhadores
Assalariados Rurais
|
|
Profit Sharing Program Overtime compensation(1)
|
|
Mar. 1, 2021
|
Jatobá
|
|
Confederação Nacional dos Trabalhadores
Assalariados Rurais
|
|
Profit Sharing Program Overtime compensation(1)
|
|
Mar. 1, 2021
|
Preferência
|
|
Confederação Nacional dos Trabalhadores
Assalariados Rurais
|
|
Profit Sharing Program Overtime compensation(1)
|
|
Mar. 1, 2021
|
Partnership II
|
|
Confederação Nacional dos Trabalhadores
Assalariados Rurais
|
|
Profit Sharing Program Overtime compensation(1)
|
|
Under negotiation
|
Araucária
|
|
Federação dos Trabalhadores na
Agricultura do Estado de MT
|
|
Profit Sharing Program Overtime compensation(1)
|
|
May 1, 2021
|
Alto Taquari
|
|
Federação dos Trabalhadores na
Agricultura do Estado de MT
|
|
Profit Sharing Program Overtime compensation(1)
|
|
May 1, 2021
|
São José
|
|
Sindicado dos Trabalhadores Rurais de São
Raimundo das Mangabeiras
|
|
Profit Sharing Program Overtime compensation(1)
|
|
May 1, 2021
|
Nova Buriti
|
|
Sindicato dos Trabalhadores Rurais de São
Paulo
|
|
Profit Sharing Program Overtime compensation(1)
|
|
May 1, 2021
|
Partnership V
|
|
Sindicato dos Trabalhadores Rurais de Sâo
Feliz do Araguaia
|
|
Profit Sharing Program Overtime compensation(1)
|
|
May 1, 2021
|
|
(1)
|
Refers
to offsetting overtime with down time instead of paying overtime compensation (“banco
de horas”) in accordance with Brazilian law.
|
The
following table indicates the number of our common shares and stock options directly held by each of our directors, executive
officers and members of fiscal council as of October 19, 2020.
Name
|
|
Number
of Common Shares
|
|
|
Percentage
of Shares
Outstanding
|
|
|
Stock
Options awarded and
not
exercised
|
|
Executive
Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
André
Guillaumon
|
|
|
213,729
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gustavo Javier Lopez
|
|
|
39,924
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eduardo S. Elsztain
(1)
|
|
|
19,910,900
|
|
|
|
32.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alejandro G. Elsztain
|
|
|
189,400
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saul Zang
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isaac Selim Sutton
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
João de Almeida
Sampaio Filho
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Camilo Marcantonio
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carlos María
Blousson
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alejandro Casaretto
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruno Magalhães
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
Council Members
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabiano Nunes Ferrari
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ivan Luvisotto Alexandre
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Débora de
Souza Morsch
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Represents less
than 1%.
|
|
(1)
|
Includes
shares held of record by Cresud, Eduardo Elsztain and Agro Managers. See “Item
7—Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions.”
|
Our
directors, executive officers and members of our Fiscal Council do not have different voting rights.
For
information about our Stock Option Plan, see “Item 6—Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Compensation—Stock
Option Plan.”
ITEM
7—MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The
table below sets forth information relating to the ownership of our common shares as of September 30, 2020.
Shareholder
|
|
Number
of Common Shares
|
|
|
Percentage
(%)
|
|
|
Number
of Common Shares (including warrants)(6)
|
|
|
Percentage
(%) (including warrants)(6)
|
|
Cresud(1)
|
|
|
19,910,800
|
|
|
|
32.06
|
|
|
|
30,910,539
|
|
|
|
39.82
|
|
Cresud
|
|
|
19,909,800
|
|
|
|
32.06
|
|
|
|
30,644,868
|
|
|
|
39.48
|
|
Agro
Managers(2)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
265,671
|
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
Autonomy Capital
(Jersey) LP(3)
|
|
|
8,269,800
|
|
|
|
13.32
|
|
|
|
8,269,800
|
|
|
|
10.65
|
|
Charles River Capital(4)
|
|
|
5,574,150
|
|
|
|
8.98
|
|
|
|
5,574,150
|
|
|
|
7.18
|
|
Elie Horn/Cape Town(5)
|
|
|
3,581,750
|
|
|
|
5.77
|
|
|
|
7,463,269
|
|
|
|
9.61
|
|
Cape
Town LLC
|
|
|
2,640,300
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
|
|
|
6,521,819
|
|
|
|
8.40
|
|
Elie
Horn
|
|
|
941,450
|
|
|
|
1.52
|
|
|
|
941,450
|
|
|
|
1.21
|
|
Directors and Executive
Officers (other than Mr. Eduardo Elsztain)
|
|
|
444,353
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
|
|
444,353
|
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
2,761,820
|
|
|
|
4.45
|
|
|
|
2,761,820
|
|
|
|
3.56
|
|
Others
|
|
|
21,561,628
|
|
|
|
34.72
|
|
|
|
22,206,445
|
|
|
|
28.61
|
|
Total
|
|
|
62,104,301
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
77,630,376
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
(1)
|
As
of September 30, 2020, Mr. Eduardo S. Elsztain held (through companies controlled by
him and proxies) a majority voting power in IFIS Limited, which owns 100% of the capital
stock of IFISA, which, in turn, holds 22.91% of the capital stock of Cresud. Finally,
Mr. Elsztain directly holds 0.09% of the capital stock of Cresud. Because of his ownership
interest in IFIS Limited and IFISA, Mr. Eduardo Elsztain may appoint the majority of
members of our board of directors and the board of directors of Cresud, as well as determine
the substantive outcome of all decisions requiring shareholder approval with respect
to Cresud. Accordingly, Mr. Elsztain may be deemed to beneficially own the shares held
by Cresud and hold the sole voting and dispositive power with respect to such shares.
|
|
(2)
|
Cresud
may be deemed to hold the sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares
held of record by Agro Managers.
|
|
(3)
|
Autonomy
Master Fund Limited is controlled by Autonomy Capital (Jersey) LP, and both entities
are part of the group that employs Mr. Bruno Magalhães, a member of our board
of directors. Certain of the shares held by Autonomy Master Fund Limited are held as
hedge for total return swap transactions entered into between Credit Suisse Securities
(Europe) Limited and Autonomy Master Fund Limited. The swap transactions mature on September
27, 2021.
|
|
(4)
|
Consolidated
position of the funds managed by Charles River Capital.
|
|
(5)
|
Includes
shares jointly held by Elie Horn and Cape Town LLC. Elie Horn is the principal shareholder
of Cape Town LLC.
|
|
(6)
|
Gives
effect to the potential issuance of 15,526,075 common shares in connection with the 256,000
first issuance warrants that may be exercised until April 27, 2021. All warrants are
held by Cresud, Agro Investment, Agro Managers and Cape Town LLC. See “Item 10—Additional
Information—Description of Outstanding Warrants.”
|
For
information about stock options held by our directors and executive officers, see “Item 6—E. Directors, Senior Management
and Employees—Share Ownership.”
Our
controlling and major shareholders do not have different voting rights.
Controlling
Shareholder
Cresud
Cresud
was organized in December 1936 under the laws of Argentina. Cresud’s principal operating activities consist of the acquisition,
development and sale of agricultural properties in Argentina, and the production of agricultural products. Its shares are listed
on the Bolsas y Mercados Argentinos S.A. (ByMA) under the trading symbol “CRES” and on the NASDAQ under the trading
symbol “CRESY.”
As
of September 30, 2019, Mr. Eduardo S. Elsztain held (through companies controlled by him and proxies) a majority voting power
in IFIS Limited, which owns 100% of the capital stock of IFISA, which holds 22.91% of the capital stock of Cresud. Finally, Mr.
Elsztain directly holds 0.09% of the capital stock of Cresud. Because of his ownership interest in IFIS Limited and IFISA, Mr.
Eduardo Elsztain may appoint the majority of our board of directors and the board of directors of Cresud, as well as determine
the substantive outcome of all decisions requiring shareholder approval with respect to Cresud.
As
a result of Cresud’s ownership interest in us, conflicts of interest could arise with respect to transactions involving
our ongoing business activities, and the resolution of these conflicts may not be favorable to us. Specifically, business opportunities,
including but not limited to potential targets for rural property acquisitions may be attractive to both Cresud and us. In addition,
five of our nine directors have been nominated by Cresud. This situation may give rise to conflicts of interest. We may not be
able to resolve any potential conflicts and, even if we do so, the resolution may be less favorable to us than if we were dealing
with an unaffiliated party.
|
A.
|
Other Major Shareholders
|
Monteiro
Aranha S.A. and Charles River Capital
Monteiro
Aranha S.A. is a Brazilian holding company founded in the early 1900s. Since its founding, the company has acquired stakes in
Klabin S.A., Brazil’s Volkswagen Foundation in 1950, Ultrapar Participações S.A. and made other investments
in the industrial and service sectors. Through its subsidiary Charles River Capital, an independent asset manager, the group is
focused on equity funds.
Autonomy
Capital (Jersey) L.P.
Autonomy
Capital (Jersey) L.P. is an asset management company founded in 2003 by Robert Gibbins with six offices across the world.
Elie
Horn and Cape Town LLC
Elie
Horn is the sole shareholder of E.H. Capital Management Ltd., which is the principal shareholder of Cape Town LLC, a company organized
under the laws of the State of Delaware. Elie Horn is the president and controlling shareholder of Cyrela Brazil Realty S.A.,
and has more than 40 years of experience in construction and management of commercial buildings in São Paulo and Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil, as well as in selling and leasing luxury and high-technology business offices, and finally, to a lesser extent,
in the leasing and management of shopping malls. In recent years, Mr. Horn has also been involved in the development of residential
condominiums. Mr. Horn previously served as a member of our board of directors, elected at the general shareholders’ meeting
held on October 27, 2011, and retired from the board on July 3, 2012.
Agro
Managers
Agro
Managers are companies organized under the laws of Argentina, controlled by Cresud´s controlling shareholder (Mr. Eduardo
Elsztain) and Cresud, respectively. Agro Investment and Agro Managers hold 0.28% of our shares and Agro Managers holds 1.70% of
our warrants.
Major
Changes in Share Ownership
Purchase
and Sale of our Common Shares by Monteiro Aranha S.A. and Other Aunds under the Management of Charles River Capital
On
August 16, 2019, Monteiro Aranha S.A.and other funds under the management of Charles River Capital bought 3,104,400 of our common
shares through the B3. Prior to the acquisition, Monteiro Aranha S.A.and other funds under the management of Charles River Capital
held 1,217,500, or 2.1%, of our outstanding common shares. Immediately after the acquisition, they held 4,321,900, or 7.6%, of
our outstanding common shares.
Purchase
and Sale of our Common Shares by Conifer Management, LLC (formerly known as Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb Inc.)
On
August 16, 2019, Conifer Management, LLC sold 2,900,000 of our common shares through the B3. Immediately after the sale, it held
zero, or 0.0%, of our outstanding common shares.
Purchase
and Sale of our Common Shares by Banco Fator
On
December 16, 2015, CSHG Commodities Fundo de Investimento Multimercado - Crédito Privado sold 1,611,000 of our common shares
through the B3. Prior to the sale, it held 3,652,900, or 3.4% of our outstanding common shares. Immediately after the sale, it
held 2,041,900, or 3.5%, of our outstanding common shares.
Purchase
and Sale of our Common Shares by Autonomy Capital (Jersey) LP
On
November 13, 2015, Autonomy Capital (Jersey) LP (“Autonomy Capital”) bought 1,668,800 of our common shares through
the B3. Prior to the acquisition, Autonomy held 2,231,500, or 3.8%, of our outstanding common shares. Immediately after the acquisition,
it held 3,900,300, or 6.7%, of our outstanding common shares.
On
February 10, 2016, Autonomy Capital bought 4,330,000 of our common shares through the B3. Prior to the acquisition, Autonomy held
4,455,300, or 7.7%, of our outstanding common shares. Immediately after the acquisition, it held 8,785,300, or 15.1%, of our outstanding
common shares.
On
April 27, 2016, Autonomy Capital sold 79,400 of our common shares through the B3. Prior to the sale, Autonomy held 8,785,300 or
15.1%, of our outstanding common shares. Immediately after the sale, it held 8,705,900, or 15.0%, of our outstanding common shares.
On
September 19, 2017, Autonomy Capital sold 600,000 of our common shares through the B3. Prior to the sale, Autonomy held 5,765,200
or 10.13%, of our outstanding common shares. Immediately after the sale, it held 5,165,200 or 9.08%, of our outstanding common
shares.
On
September 22, 2017, Autonomy Capital bought 2,566,800 of our common shares through the B3. Prior to the sale, Autonomy held 5,165,200
or 9.08%, of our outstanding common shares. Immediately after the sale, it held 7,732,000 or 13.59%, of our outstanding common
shares.
On
October 6, 2017, Autonomy Capital sold 2,263,790 of our common shares through the B3. Prior to the sale, Autonomy held 7,732,000
or 13.59%, of our outstanding common shares. Immediately after the sale, it held 5,468,210 or 9.61%, of our outstanding common
shares.
Purchase
and Sale of our Common Shares by JP Morgan Whitefriars Inc.
On
November 13, 2015, JP Morgan Whitefriars bought 1,668,800 of our common shares through the B3. Prior to the acquisition, JP Morgan
Whitefriars held 2,231,500, or 3.8%, of our outstanding common shares. Immediately after the acquisition, it held 3,900,300, or
6.7%, of our outstanding common shares.
On
February 18, 2016, JP Morgan Whitefriars sold 3,900,300 of our common shares through the B3. Prior to the sale, JP Morgan Whitefriars
held 3,900,300 or 3.8%, of our outstanding common shares. Immediately after the sale, it held zero, or 0.0%, of our outstanding
common shares.
ADRs
On
September 30, 2020, we had 22,032,848 shares representing ADRs, which were held in the United States by one holder of record.
B.
|
Related Party
Transactions
|
We
adhere to the corporate governance practices recommended and required under applicable law, including under the rules and regulations
of the Novo Mercado and the B3 and Brazilian corporate law.
Decisions
made regarding our operations are supervised by our board of directors and fiscal council in accordance with our bylaws and applicable
law. Our bylaws provide that provision of services and consulting contracts entered into among us or our affiliates, on the one
hand, and shareholders that, individually or in the aggregate, own at least 10% of our capital stock shall be submitted by our
board of directors for shareholder approval at our general meeting.
Contracts
entered into with related parties are negotiated individually and are analyzed in comparison with the market conditions of the
applicable region. Along these lines, all transactions entered into with related parties should be documented, including their
principal terms such as price, term limit, interest rates, and the respective rights and obligations of the parties, and such
terms should be consistent with those prevailing in the market.
We,
our shareholders, our directors and officers, and the members of our fiscal council, when active, should submit to arbitration
for any dispute relating to the application, legality, effectiveness, interpretation, violation and effects of violation of the
provisions in the agreement for participation in the Novo Mercado listing segment, and to the Novo Mercado listing
rules, the arbitration regulation instituted by the B3, the provisions of Brazilian corporate law, our bylaws, the rules of the
National Monetary Council, or Conselho Monetário Nacional (“CMN”) and the Central Bank, the regulations of
the Securities Commission, or Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (“CVM”), and the B3 and other rules generally
applicable to the Brazilian capital markets. Any such dispute should be settled by arbitration carried out before B3 Arbitration
Chamber.
According
to Chapter 12 of this rule, the parties may consent to agree to use another arbitration chamber or forum to resolve their disputes.
Investment
in Agrofy
In
October 2019, we made an investment of US$ 1.0 million in Agrofy, which represented a 1.8% stake in the share capital of Agrofy.
Agrofy is an online marketplace that offers a complete range of e-commerce solutions customized to meet the needs of retailers
and their partners, seeking an alternative way of connecting farmers and suppliers. As of June 30, 2020, Cresud, our controlling
shareholder, held a 22.3% stake in the share capital of Agrofy.
Cresca
Acquisition and re-distribution of assets and liabilities
Purchase
of interest in joint venture, debts and advisory contract with Cresca S.A.
On
December 12, 2013, BrasilAgro executed contracts with Cresud for: (i) the acquisition of 50% interest in Cresca S.A., (ii) the
assumption of Cresud credits from Cresca, and (iii) the execution of an advisory contract pursuant to which Cresud has agreed
to render services in the forest agricultural exploration to Cresca in exchange for payments of fees.
Cresca
is a company that invests in agricultural and cattle raising land in Paraguay. At the purchase date, it owned approximately 81,000
hectares and a contract for the right to purchase approximately 61,000 additional hectares of agricultural land in the region
of Mariscal Estigarribia in Paraguay.
Pursuant
to the agreement, Cresca purchased 35,864 hectares on July 9, 2014 and the remaining 24,753 on January 20, 2015.
On
April 7, 2014, Cresca sold 24,624 undeveloped hectares.
On
October 5, 2016, we entered into an agreement with Carlos Casado, our partner in Cresca at the time, pursuant to which we agreed
to try to sell all the land that Cresca owned for a 120-day period as of the execution date of the aforementioned agreement. Further
to the provisions of the agreement, we and Carlos Casado also agreed to split ownership of the land among us and Carlos Casado
if either party failed to dispose of the totality of the land within the 120-day period.
As
the properties were not sold to third-parties, on June 6 and June 8, 2017, we and Carlos Casado decided to proceed with the re-distribution
of assets and liabilities of Cresca, whereby we would separate and divide the assets and liabilities of Cresca, and Cresca would
distribute them to us and to Carlos Casado.
As
a result of this transaction, we now have the following two subsidiaries that received Cresca’s assets and liabilities:
(i) Palmeiras, which was incorporated to operate the activities of our investment in Cresca and (ii) Moroti, a subsidiary that
received, on February 9, 2018, upon conclusion of the process, all other assets and liabilities of Cresca attributed to BrasilAgro,
including land and debts.
On
February 9, 2018, the re-distribution of assets and liabilities of Cresca was concluded and the portion of assets and liabilities
attributed to the Company was transferred to the wholly-owned subsidiary Moroti.
As
part of the redistribution of assets and liabilities, the Company and Carlos Casado, partners in the joint venture, decided to
waive the interest for late payment on the intercompany loans taken by Cresca in the total amount of R$32,9 million, of which
BrasilAgro’s share was R$16,6 million.
As
of June 30, 2020, Moroti owned 59,585 hectares of which 34,673 were arable. For more information, see Note 1.6 to the financial
statements included in this annual report.
|
C.
|
Interests of
experts and counsel
|
Not
applicable.
ITEM
8—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
A.
|
Consolidated
Statements and Other Financial Information
|
See
“Item 18—Financial Statements” below.
Legal
Proceedings
We
and our subsidiaries are subject to legal and administrative proceedings involving environmental, labor, civil, tax and criminal
matters. As of June 30, 2020, we were defendants in 98 pending legal and administrative proceedings, of which 13 are environmental
proceedings, 46 are labor proceedings, 31 are tax proceedings, 7 are civil proceedings, and one is a criminal proceeding. Also,
as of June 30, 2020, we were plaintiffs in 21 pending legal and administrative proceedings, of which one is an environmental proceeding,
6 are tax proceedings and 14 are civil proceedings.
As
of June 30, 2020, we had total provisions of R$1.467 million for probable losses, including R$1 million for labor proceedings,
R$67 thousand for civil proceedings and R$400 thousand for environmental proceedings. We believe that our provisions for contingencies
suffices for purposes of covering probable losses that may result from the proceedings to which our Company and our subsidiaries
are parties, based on the opinion of our external legal advisors.
The
labor proceedings include claims filed by former employees and third-party contractors. In most cases, the Company and its subsidiaries
are jointly liable for claims by third party contractors, since the discussion involves possible rights between outsourcing companies
and their former employees. See “Item 3— Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to our Business and
Industry—We are dependent on third-party service providers and subject to recent changes in the Brazilian labor legal framework.”
We
do not expect probable losses to result from our tax and criminal proceedings currently in progress.
Among
our legal and administrative proceedings as of June 30, 2020, we have identified the following material contingencies in view
of the adverse effects that they could have on our activities and the amount involved in the claims (we considered material for
this purpose all legal and administrative proceedings filed against the Company involving amounts exceeding R$500 thousand):
Civil
Proceedings
We
are defendants in a civil claim filed on June 10, 2009 by certain parties in the Judicial District Court of Correntina, State
of Bahia, for the annulment of the deed of sale and purchase of agricultural property executed by and among our Company and others.
We have filed our defense and await the decision. The total amount involved in the claim is R$4.8 million and our chance of loss
is estimated as possible. If we are unsuccessful, we could be required to relinquish the equivalent of 2,561,681 hectares of land
corresponding to 6.9% of the total area of Chaparral farm. We have not made any provision in connection with this proceeding.
We
are co-defendants in an action for damages brought on March 14, 2013 by the widow of an individual who died in a car accident
on August 29, 2011 involving a truck used by one of our service providers for the cutting, loading and transportation of sugar-cane
produced in our Araucaria farm. We filed our defense on March 19, 2013. We are waiting for the decision that will start the evidence
phase in the proceedings. The total amount involved in the suit, as claimed by the plaintiff, is R$1.4 million and our chances
of loss have been classified as possible. We have not made any provision in connection with this proceeding.
We
are defendants in an injunction lawsuit filed by Mundo dos Cereais on May 10, 2010 seeking to void an out-of-court promissory
note that BrasilAgro presented to a notary public for collection against Mundo dos Cereais issued to guarantee Mundo dos Cereais’
acknowledgement of debt in a principal amount of R$847 thousand and relating to an agreement for the purchase of rice. On October
25, 2016, the trial judge issued an order dismissing the lawsuit. Despite the fact that the lawsuit has been dismissed, we filed
a motion for clarification to reinstate the effects of our presentation of the promissory note for collection. We are currently
waiting for a decision on our motion for clarification.
Tax
Proceedings
As
of June 30, 2020, we had judicial and administrative tax claims in the amount of R$5.4 million mainly related to proceedings whose
merit is related to: (i) notice of infraction issued for the collection of ICMS tax credits based on the understanding that the
Company would have remitted primary products to exporter companies with the specific purpose of exporting, alleging that such
products would not have been remitted abroad in the period of 180 days from the shipment of goods; and (ii) the reversal of a
court order that partially approved negative income tax credits for the fourth quarter of 2007 and, as a consequence, did not
approve offsets made by the Company relating to such credits. We have not made any provision in connection with these tax proceedings.
Also,
we are plaintiffs in judicial and administrative claims in the aggregate amount of R$2.0 million mainly related to proceedings
whose merit is related to: (i) suspension of INCRA, SEBRAE and FNDE contributions; and (ii) the annulment of tax credits related
to monthly estimates of IRPJ and CSLL for January 2012.
Environmental
Proceedings
We
were defendants in an environmental administrative claim filed on September 13, 2013 by the Environmental Protection Board for
the Brazilian Institute for the Environment and Natural Renewable Resources (Ibama) involving the total amount of R$5.9 million
under the argument that we have deforested a permanent preservation area. The Ibama notified us on October 8, 2012 that it had
rejected our defense. In October 2012, we filed an appeal to this decision, which was also rejected. On September 13, 2013, we
filed a lawsuit before the federal courts of Goiás, for annulment of the infraction notice and cancellation of the fine.
On October 15, 2013, we placed a court deposit on the amount equivalent to the fine imposed, in order to obtain the granting of
injunction relief to suspend the payment of the fine until the end of the lawsuit. Due to the court deposit, the payment of the
fine is suspended until final judgment in the case. In June 2015, a favorable decision was enacted in the first instance, decreasing
the annulment of the infraction notice and cancellation of the fine. Ibama has submitted an appeal in order to revert such decision.
On March 30, 2016, we filed a petition requesting the replacement of the deposit for a letter of guarantee corresponding to the
amount of R$7.94 million (updated value of the deposit plus 30%, according to the article 848 of the Brazilian Civil Procedure
Code). On August 29, 2016, the court granted the replacement of the guarantee. On September 9, 2016, Ibama filed an appeal against
such decision and, on December 16, 2016, BrasilAgro filed its answer to Ibama’s appeal. On June 1, 2017, BrasilAgro filed
a motion requesting the enforcement of replacement of guarantee. On June 5, 2017, the court allowed BrasilAgro to withdraw the
judicial deposit in the amount of R$5.75 million. On June 11, 2018, BrasilAgro filed a motion requesting the replacement of the
letter of guarantee by an insurance letter. We are currently awaiting a ruling on Ibama’s appeals. Considering there has
been a favorable decision at the lower court level in this particular lawsuit, our chances of loss have been classified as remote.
Labor
Proceedings
We
are co-defendants in a labor judicial claim filed on June 17, 2016 by two individuals involving a revised amount of R$824 thousand.
The lawsuit seeks to acknowlegde illegal outsourcing and the payment of material and moral damages. The lawsuit has been suspended
by a judicial order while the determination of the standing of the plaintiffs is pending. We have not made any provision in connection
with this proceeding.
We
are also defendants in two related claims filed on March 10, 2020 and March 31, 2020 by two other individuals involving a revised
amount of R$2.5 million. These lawsuits seek the payment of material and moral damages for a fatal accident involving their son.
On July 15, 2020, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the plaintiffs to dismiss the lawsuits.
Administrative
Proceedings involving our Controlling Shareholder and Directors
In
June 2015, an application to approve an action as a class action was filed with the Central District Court in Lod, Israel, against
IDBD, Dolphin Netherlands BV (IDBD’s controlling shareholder), C.A.A. Extra Holdings Ltd. (IDBD’s former controlling
shareholder, or “CAA”), and current and former directors, including alternate directors (including, among others,
Messrs. Eduardo Elsztain, Sholem Lapidot, Saul Zang and Mauricio Wior) (the “Defendants”). The complaint alleges that
they hold shares in IDBD and that they are creditors of a debt arrangement with IDB Holdings Corporation Ltd. (the “Plaintiffs”
and “Debt Arrangement,” respectively) raising, among others, claims regarding the conduct of IDBD’s controlling
shareholders and of its board of directors in connection with the expiration of a transaction for the sale of IDBD’s holdings
in Clal Insurance Enterprises Holdings Ltd. (“Clal Insurance”) in May 2014 and in connection with a rights issuance
by IDBD in July 2014 and February 2015.
In
March 2016, the Plaintiffs filed a motion to dismiss the class action application and, in June 2016, the Court partially accepted
the motion and ordered the Plaintiffs to file an amended class action application that would include only the allegations and
remedies with respect to the Clal Insurance transaction. In August 2016, the Defendants filed a motion to appeal (regarding the
part of decision that did not dismiss the allegations concerning the Clal Insurance transaction) and the Plaintiffs filed an appeal
(regarding the part of the decision that dismissed the allegations concerning the rights issuance) both with the Israeli Supreme
Court.
Following
the dismissal of the appeal proceedings by the Supreme Court, the Plaintiffs filed, in January 2018, a motion of appeal to summarily
dismiss the appeal filed by the Defendants, in which the Court ordered the striking of the motion for causes of action that fall
under an exemption condition included in the amendment to the Debt Arrangement pertaining to damage that was allegedly caused
due to prejudice of rights by virtue of the undertaking of the controlling shareholder and the former controlling shareholder
to perform a tender offer for IDBD’s shares in accordance with the Debt Arrangement. The Plaintiffs filed an amended motion
to approve the claim as a class action.
Dolphin,
IDBD and IDBD’s directors filed a detailed joint answer on May 7, 2018. The preliminary hearing was scheduled for November
28, 2019.
In
July 2019, the Plaintiffs filed a motion (in partial agreement) for withdrawal from the proceeding against the Defendants. In
light of CAA and IDBD’s former controlling shareholder refusal to agree to the Plaintiffs’ withdrawal without an order
for expenses, the Court has set a time for filing arguments on the expenses.
Distributions
to Shareholders
Amounts
Available for Distribution
At
each annual shareholders’ meeting, our board of directors is required to submit to shareholder approval its proposal on
the allocation of our net income for the preceding year. Pursuant to Brazilian corporate law, the proposal of the board of directors
has to be evaluated by the fiscal council (conselho fiscal), if in operation. Brazilian corporate law defines “net
income” for any fiscal year as the results in a given year after the deduction of accrued losses from prior years, the provisions
for income and social contribution taxes for that year, and any amounts allocated to profit-sharing payments to the employees
and management (provided, however, that such payments will only be disbursed after payment of the mandatory dividend to the company’s
shareholders). All calculations in connection with net income and its allocation to reserves are based on the audited financial
statements for the preceding fiscal year.
Our
bylaws provide that an amount equal to at least 25% of our adjusted net income for any given year should be available for distribution
as a mandatory dividend or interest on shareholders’ equity. Adjusted net income is calculated by adjusting net income as
follows: (i) deducting amounts allocated to legal reserve, statutory reserve, contingency reserve, retained earnings and unrealized
profit reserve, as applicable; (ii) adding amounts reversed from the contingency reserve; and (iii) adding unrealized profit reserve
amounts, upon their realization and if not offset by subsequent losses, if any. Such amount represents the minimum mandatory dividend,
or mandatory dividend. The allocation of amounts to the mentioned reserves cannot be made to the detriment of the payment of the
mandatory dividend. Moreover, the minimum mandatory dividend may be limited to the ‘realized’ portion of net income.
Our calculation of net income and allocations to reserves for any year, as well as the amounts available for distribution, are
determined on the basis of our financial statements prepared in accordance with Brazilian corporate law. For more information,
see “Item 8—Financial Information— Payment of Dividends and Interest on Shareholders’ Equity” below.
The
distribution of dividends for the year ended June 30, 2020 was approved at our shareholders’ meeting held on October 16,
2020 in the amount of R$42.0 million, or R$0.7078 (or US$0.1259) per share. The dividends shall be paid to shareholders in up
to 30 days from the date of their declaration, for holders of record of our shares as of October 16, 2020.
Reserve
Accounts
Brazilian
corporate law provide for two main categories of reserve accounts, which may be used for purposes of dividend payments: income
reserve accounts and capital reserve account.
Income
Reserve Accounts
Pursuant
to Brazilian corporate law, our income reserve accounts are comprised of the legal reserve, the contingency reserve, the fiscal
subsidies reserve, the investment and expansions reserve and the retained earnings reserve.
The
balance of the income reserves, except for the balances of contingency, fiscal subsidies and unrealized profit reserves, may not
exceed the amount of our capital stock. In case of excess, our shareholders shall decide at a shareholders’ meeting whether
the excess amount will be used to pay or increase our capital stock or pay dividends.
Legal
reserve: Under Brazilian corporate law, we are required to maintain a legal reserve to which we must allocate 5% of our net
income for each fiscal year until the aggregate amount of the reserve equals 20% of our capital stock. However, we are not required
to make any allocations to our legal reserve in a year in which the legal reserve, when added to our other capital reserves, exceeds
30% of our capital stock. The amounts allocated to such reserve must be approved by our shareholders in a shareholders’
meeting, and may only be used to increase our capital stock or to offset net losses. As of June 30, 2020, we had R$31.5 million
allocated to legal reserve.
Contingency
reserve: Pursuant to Brazilian corporate law, a percentage of our net income may be allocated to a contingency reserve for
anticipated losses that are deemed probable in future years, if their amount may be estimated. This allocation has to be proposed
by the company’s management and approved at a shareholders’ meeting. The management’s proposal must indicate
the cause of the anticipated loss and justify the need for such allocation. Any amount so allocated must be reversed in the fiscal
year in which a loss that had been anticipated fails to occur as projected or charged off in the event that the anticipated loss
occurs. As of June 30, 2020, we had no contingency reserve.
Fiscal
subsidies reserve: The part of net income corresponding to amounts granted by the government to our company for investment
purposes may be allocated to the fiscal subsidies reserve. Pursuant to Brazilian corporate law, this allocation is only permitted
if proposed by our management and approved at a shareholders’ meeting. Such amounts will not be taken into account for purposes
of the calculation of the mandatory dividend. As of June 30, 2020, we had no fiscal subsidies reserve.
Investment
and expansion reserve: Pursuant to Brazilian corporate law, the amount by which the mandatory dividend exceeds the realized
net income in any given year may be allocated to other earnings reserve or investment and expansion reserve, and the mandatory
dividends may be limited to the realized portion of the net income. Brazilian corporate law defines realized net income as the
amount by which our net income exceeds the sum of our net positive results, if any, from the equity method of accounting; and
the income, gains or profits resulting from transactions that occurred in the relevant fiscal year but that will be received by
us after the end of the next year. Profits recorded as earnings reserve must be added to the next mandatory dividend distributed
after the realization of such profits, if not absorbed by losses in subsequent years. As of June 30, 2020, we had R$327.1 million
allocated to investment and expansion reserve.
Retained
earnings reserve: Pursuant to Brazilian corporate law, we are permitted to allocate part of our net income to discretionary
reserve accounts that may be established in accordance with our bylaws, which must also indicate the purpose, allotment criteria
and maximum amount of the reserve. The allocation of net income to retained earnings reserve accounts may not be made if it affects
the payment of the minimum mandatory dividend. As of June 30, 2020, we had no funds allocated to retained earnings reserves.
Capital
Reserve Account
Pursuant
to Brazilian corporate law, we may maintain capital reserves in which we may record goodwill paid in connection with the subscription
of our shares, mergers, sale of warrants, subscription bonds, participation certificates (which are not applicable to us), debentures,
donations, stock option granted and governmental granting for investments. These reserves may only be used for the following purposes:
(i) to offset losses that exceed the retained earnings and income reserves, (ii) to redeem, repay or purchase shares of our capital
stock, and (iii) to increase our capital stock. The amounts allocated to our capital reserve account are not considered for purposes
of the calculation of mandatory dividends. As of June 30, 2020, we had R$(34.3) million allocated to reserve of goodwill on share
issue, linked to the acquisition of Agrifirma on January 27, 2020 (See Note 1.1 to the financial statements included in this annual
report), a transaction that was completed through a transfer of shares that generated a difference between capital increase and
equity increase.
Payment
of Dividends and Interest on Shareholders’ Equity
Brazilian
corporate law requires that the bylaws of a Brazilian corporation specify a minimum percentage of the income available for the
annual distribution of dividends, known as mandatory dividend, which must be paid to shareholders as either dividends or interest
on shareholders’ equity. The basis of the mandatory dividend is a percentage of the net income, as adjusted pursuant to
Brazilian corporate law. Under our bylaws, a minimum of 25% of our adjusted net income should be intended for the distribution
and payment to our shareholders as mandatory dividend. However, the payment of mandatory dividends to our shareholders may be
limited to the amount of realized net income in a given year, provided the difference should be recorded as unrealized income
reserve. Our calculation of net income and allocations to reserves for any year, as well as the amounts available for distribution,
are determined on the basis of our non-consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with Brazilian corporate law.
The mandatory dividend may also be paid as interest on shareholders’ equity, in which event it is deemed a deductible expense
for purposes of income and social contribution taxes on revenue.
In
addition, our board of directors may advise our shareholders that additional dividends may be distributed from other income or
reserves legally available for distribution. Brazilian corporate law allows, however, a company to suspend such dividend distribution
if its board of directors reports at our annual shareholders’ meeting that the distribution would be inadvisable given the
company’s financial condition. The fiscal council, if in place at the time, should review any suspension of the mandatory
dividend. In addition, our management should submit a report to the CVM setting forth the reasons for the suspension. Net income
not distributed by virtue of a suspension is allocated to a separate reserve and, if not absorbed by subsequent losses, is required
to be distributed as dividends as soon as the financial condition of the company should permit such payment.
Our
board of directors may distribute interim dividends on the basis of monthly, bi-monthly, quarterly or semi-annual financial statements.
Our dividend policy has to comply at all times with the mandatory dividend requirements under Brazilian corporate law.
Shareholders
have a three-year period from the date of the payment to claim the dividends or interest on shareholders’ equity with respect
to their common shares, as applicable, after which the aggregate amount of any unclaimed amounts legally reverts to us.
Dividends
The
distribution of dividends in any given fiscal year is proposed by our executive officers (Diretoria) to the board of directors,
which then submits a detailed proposal to shareholders at a shareholders’ meeting. In preparing this proposal, the board
of directors will take into account our business strategy, investment plans, financial condition and the recommendations of the
fiscal council. The proposal for distribution of dividends is then submitted to our annual shareholders’ meeting, in which
a majority of the voting shareholders is necessary to approve it. We may distribute additional dividends if so deemed adequate
by our board of directors in view of our capital structure. Our board of directors may revise or modify our dividend policy at
any time.
We
are required by Brazilian corporate law and our bylaws to hold an annual shareholders’ meeting no later than four months
after the end of each fiscal year, at which time the allocation of the results of operations in any year and the distribution
of an annual dividend are reviewed. The distribution of annual dividends is based on our audited financial statements prepared
for the immediately preceding fiscal year.
Any
holder of record of common shares at the time a dividend is declared is entitled to receive dividends. Under Brazilian corporate
law, dividends are generally required to be paid within 60 days following the date on which the dividend is declared, unless the
shareholders’ resolution established another payment date, which, in any event, must occur before the end of the year in
which the dividend is declared. Our bylaws do not require that dividend payments be adjusted for inflation.
Interest
on Shareholders’ Equity
Since
January 1, 1996, Brazilian companies have been authorized to pay interest on shareholders’ equity to shareholders, and to
treat those payments as deductible expenses for purposes of calculating corporate income tax and, since 1997, the social contribution
tax, as well. The amount of the tax deduction in each year is limited to the greater of (i) 50.0% of our net income (after the
deduction of social contribution tax on net profit, but before taking into account the provision for corporate income tax and
the amounts attributable to shareholders as interest on shareholders’ equity) for the period in respect of which the payment
is made; and (ii) 50.0% of our accumulated profits and income reserves at the beginning of the relevant period. The rate applied
in calculating interest on shareholders’ equity cannot exceed the pro rata daily variation of the TJLP.
Payments
of interest on shareholders’ equity to our shareholders, whether or not residing in Brazil, are subject to Brazilian withholding
tax at the rate of 15%. A tax rate of 25% applies if the shareholder receiving such interest on shareholders’ equity resides
at a Tax Haven Jurisdiction, which is defined under Brazilian tax laws as a country where income tax is not levied, or levied
at a maximum rate lower than 17%, or where the local legislation does not allow access to information related to shareholding
composition of legal entities or to their ownership or to the identity of the effective beneficiary of the income attributed to
non-residents. See “Item 10—Additional Information—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations—Interest
on Shareholders’ Equity.”
Amounts
paid as interest on shareholders’ equity, net of withheld income tax, can be taken into consideration for purposes of distribution
of the mandatory dividend. If a distribution of interest on shareholders’ equity in any given fiscal year is not recorded
as part of the mandatory dividend distribution, we will not withhold the applicable income tax, which will have to be paid by
our shareholders.
Pursuant
to Law No. 9,249, of December 26, 1995, as amended, interest on shareholders’ equity paid or payable to our shareholders
should be computed in our results for the year under financial expenses. For purposes of the presentation of financial statements,
however, these amounts revert to the statement of income charged to accumulated earnings as profit distribution.
We
have never paid interest on shareholders’ equity since the beginning of our operations.
Recent
Dividend Payments
The
distribution of dividends for the year ended June 30, 2020 was approved at our shareholders’ meeting held on October 16,
2020 in the amount of R$42.0 million, or R$0.7078 (or US$0.1259) per share. The payment of dividends will be made to shareholders
in up to 60 days from the date of their declaration, for holders of record of our shares as of October 16, 2020.
The
distribution of dividends for the year ended June 30, 2019 was approved at our shareholders’ meeting held on October 16,
2019 in the amount of R$50.0 million, or R$0.93 (or US$0.22) per share. The payment of dividends was made on November 14, 2019,
for holders of record of our shares as of October 16, 2019.
The
distribution of dividends for the year ended June 30, 2018 was approved at our shareholders’ meeting held on October 16,
2018 in the amount of R$41.0 million, or R$0.76 (or US$0.21) per share. The payment of dividends to shareholders was made on November
6, 2018, for holders of record of our shares as of October 16, 2018.
The
distribution of dividends for the year ended June 30, 2017 was approved at our shareholders’ meeting held on October 2,
2017 in the amount of R$13.0 million, or R$0.27 (or US$0.07) per share. The payment of dividends to shareholders was made on October
30, 2017, for holders of record of our shares as of October 2, 2017.
The
distribution of dividends for the year ended June 30, 2016 was approved at our shareholders’ meeting held on October 21,
2016 in the amount of R$10.0 million, or R$0.18 (or US$0.06) per share and at our extraordinary shareholders’ meeting held
on November 07, 2016 in the amount of R$22.0 million, or R$0.40 (or US$0.12) per share, totaling the amount of R$32.0 million
or R$0.58 (or US$ 0.18) per share.
The
Company is not aware of any changes bearing upon its financial condition since the date of the financial statements included in
this Annual
Report.
ITEM
9—THE OFFER AND LISTING
A.
|
Offer and listing
details
|
Our
common shares began trading on the Novo Mercado market segment of the B3 on May 15, 2006 under the symbol AGRO3. The ISIN
for our common shares is BRAGROACNOR7.
In
September 2010, we established a Level 1 American Depositary Receipt (ADR) program in the United States, which, as of September
20, 2010, has allowed our ADRs to be traded on the over-the-counter (OTC) market in the United States under the symbol “BRCPY.”
In
November 2012, we established a Level 2 American Depositary Receipt (ADR) program in the United States, which, as of November
8, 2012, has allowed our ADRs to be traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol “LND.”
As
of June 30, 2020, we had 11,786,207 ADRs outstanding, with no par value. There are no restrictions on ownership of our ADRs by
individuals or legal entities domiciled outside Brazil.
Investments
in our Common Shares by Non-residents of Brazil
Investors
residing outside Brazil are authorized to purchase equity instruments, including our common shares, on the B3, provided that they
comply with the registration requirements set forth in Resolution No. 4,373 and CVM Instruction No. 325.
Except
for certain limited exceptions, Resolution No. 4,373 sets forth that investors are permitted to carry out any type of transaction
in the Brazilian financial capital market involving a security traded on a Brazilian stock, futures or organized OTC market. Investments
and remittances outside Brazil of gains, dividends, profits or other payments derived from our common shares are made by means
of the foreign exchange market.
In
order to become a Resolution No. 4,373 investor, an investor residing outside Brazil must:
|
●
|
appoint a representative
in Brazil with powers to take actions relating to the investment;
|
|
●
|
obtain a taxpayer
identification number from the Brazilian tax authorities;
|
|
●
|
appoint an authorized
custodian in Brazil for the investments, which must be a financial institution duly authorized by the Central Bank and CVM;
and
|
|
●
|
by means of its
representative, register himself as a foreign investor at CVM and the investment at the Central Bank.
|
Securities
and other financial assets held by foreign investors pursuant to Resolution No. 4,373 must be registered or maintained in deposit
accounts or under the custody of an entity duly licensed by the Central Bank or the CVM. In addition, securities trading by foreign
investors are as a general rule restricted to transactions involving securities listed on the Brazilian stock exchanges or traded
in organized OTC markets licensed by the CVM.
Foreign
direct investors under Law No. 4,131, of September 3, 1962, as amended, or Law No. 4,131, may sell their shares in both private
and open market transactions, but these investors are currently subject to less favorable tax treatment on gains. Particularly
in this regard, please refer to “Item 10—Additional Information—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations—Taxation
of Gains.”
A
foreign direct investor under Law No. 4,131 must:
|
●
|
register himself
as a foreign direct investor at the Central Bank;
|
|
●
|
obtain a taxpayer
identification number from the Brazilian tax authorities; and
|
|
●
|
appoint a tax representative
in Brazil; and appoint a representative in Brazil for service of process in respect of suits based on the Brazilian corporate
law.
|
Not
applicable.
Our
common shares are traded on the Novo Mercado listing segment of B3 under the symbol “AGRO3.” Our ADRs are traded
on New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol “LND.”
Trading
on the B3
B3
concentrates all trading activities of shares and commodities in Brazil. Trading on the exchange is conducted by authorized members.
Trading sessions take place every business day, from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (local time) on an electronic trading system called
Megabolsa. Trading is also conducted between 5:30 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. (local time) in an after-market system connected to both
traditional broker dealers and brokerage firms operating on the Internet. This after-market trading is subject to regulatory limits
on price volatility of securities traded by investors operating on the Internet.
In
order to maintain control over the fluctuation of the B3 index, the B3 has adopted a “circuit breaker” system pursuant
to which trading sessions may be suspended for a period of 30 minutes or one hour whenever the B3 index falls below 10% or 15%,
respectively, in relation to the closing index levels of the previous trading session. In addition, in case the B3 index falls
below the 20% mark, the B3 may suspend trading sessions for a period of time to be established at its discretion at the time said
lower mark is reached.
When
investors trade shares on the B3, the trade is settled in three business days after the trade date, without adjustments to the
purchase price. The seller is ordinarily required to deliver the shares to the exchange on the third business day following the
trade date. Delivery of and payment for shares are made through the facilities of an independent clearing house, the Central Depository
B3, which handles the multilateral central counterparty settlement of both financial obligations and transactions involving securities.
According to the regulations of the B3, financial settlement is carried out through the system of transfer of funds of the Central
Bank and the transactions involving the sale and purchase of shares are settled through the B3 custody system. All deliveries
against final payment are irrevocable.
The
Novo Mercado segment
The
Novo Mercado is a stock market segment of the B3 intended for companies meeting certain requirements and agreeing to adhere
to heightened corporate governance rules. The principal Novo Mercado rules and requirements are summarized as follows:
|
●
|
capital stock should
be exclusively composed of common shares, and the issuance or maintenance of so called founder’s shares is prohibited;
|
|
●
|
public float of
shares should represent at least 25% of the capital stock;
|
|
●
|
in the event of
a transfer of control, even if through a series of successive sales, the transfer should be subject to the minority shareholders
being granted the same conditions offered to any controlling shareholders, including the same price, through a tender offer
for the acquisition of shares (tag-along rights);
|
|
●
|
the board of directors
should be composed of at least five members, of which at least 20% should be independent directors elected during the shareholders’
meeting for a term of up to two years, with reelection permitted;
|
|
●
|
new members of the
board of directors and the executive officers are required to sign an agreement, the Management’s Consent Statement
(Termo de Anuência dos Administradores), that makes their taking of office subject to the execution of this agreement,
through which the new directors and executive officers of the company take personal responsibility to act in accordance with
the listing agreement with the Novo Mercado, the rules of the Market Arbitration Chamber (Câmara de Arbitragem
do Mercado) and the Novo Mercado regulation;
|
|
●
|
a statement of cash
flow (both the company’s and consolidated) must be included in the quarterly financial reports and annual financial
statements;
|
|
●
|
the schedule of
corporate events should be disclosed annually to the shareholders, by the end of the month of January; and
|
|
●
|
delisting from the
Novo Mercado, as well as the decision to cancel the registration as a public company, should be subject to any controlling
shareholders’ making a public tender offer for the acquisition of all outstanding shares of the company, at a minimum
price of their economic value determined in a valuation report prepared by a specialized institution or company with recognized
experience and independent from persons with the power to make decisions within a company, such as directors or any controlling
shareholders, in addition to meeting the requirements set forth in Article 4 of the Brazilian corporate law; and the issuer,
any controlling shareholders, members of management and members of the fiscal council should submit to the Market Arbitration
Chamber under the terms of its regulation, any dispute or controversies that may arise among themselves, relating to and resulting
from, specifically, the application, validity, effectiveness, interpretation, violation and effects of the arrangements contained
in the Brazilian corporate law, our bylaws, the rules and regulations of the CMN, the Central Bank, and the CVM, as well as
additional rules and regulations applicable to the capital markets, Novo Mercado regulation, the rules of the Market
Arbitration Chamber and the listing agreement with the Novo Mercado.
|
Regulation
of Brazilian securities markets
The
Brazilian securities market is governed by the CVM, as provided for by Law No. 6,385, of December 7, 1976, as amended, or the
Brazilian Securities Exchange Law, and Brazilian corporate law. The CVM is responsible for granting licenses to brokerage firms
to govern their incorporation and operation, and regulating foreign investment and exchange transactions, as provided for by the
Brazilian Securities Exchange Law and Law No. 4,595, of December 31, 1964, as amended. These laws and regulations provide for,
among other things, disclosure requirements, criminal sanctions for insider trading and price manipulation, protection of minority
shareholders, the procedures for licensing and supervising brokerage firms and the governance of Brazilian stock exchanges.
Under
Brazilian corporate law, a company is required to be publicly held, or companhia aberta, before listing its shares. All
publicly held companies are registered with the CVM and are subject to reporting requirements in order to periodically disclose
information and material facts. A company registered with the CVM may trade its securities either on the Brazilian exchange markets,
including the B3, or in the Brazilian OTC market. Shares of companies listed on B3 may not simultaneously trade on the Brazilian
OTC market. The OTC market consists of direct trades between persons in which a financial institution registered with the CVM
serves as an intermediary.
No
special application, other than registration with the CVM (or, in case of organized OTC markets, registration with the applicable
one), is necessary for securities of a public company to be traded in this market. To be listed on the B3, a company must apply
for registration at the B3 and the CVM.
The
trading of securities on B3 may be suspended at the request of a company in anticipation of a material announcement. Trading may
also be suspended upon the initiative of the B3 or the CVM based on or due to a belief that a company has provided inadequate
information regarding a significant event or has provided inadequate responses to inquiries raised by the CVM or the B3, among
other reasons.
Not
applicable.
Not
applicable.
Not
applicable.
ITEM
10—ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Not
applicable.
B.
|
Memorandum and
Articles of Association
|
Organization,
Register and Entry Number
We
are a publicly-listed corporation, or sociedade por ações de capital aberto, organized in accordance with
Brazilian law. Our registered office is located at Avenida Faria Lima, 1309, 5th floor, in the city of São Paulo,
State of São Paulo, Brazil. We are registered with the Commercial Registry of the state of São Paulo (Junta Comercial
do Estado de São Paulo) under NIRE No. 35.300.326.237, and with the CVM under No. 20036.
On
April 10, 2006, we and our principal shareholders entered into the Novo Mercado Participation Agreement (Contrato de
Participação no Novo Mercado) with B3. Also, as required under the Novo Mercado listing regulations,
all our directors, officers and members of our fiscal council have undertaken to abide by the rules set forth in the Novo Mercado
Participation Agreement and by the Novo Mercado listing segment rules and regulations applicable to each of them.
Our
common shares are traded on the Novo Mercado listing segment of B3 under the symbol “AGRO3.” In September 2010,
we established a Level 1 American Depositary Receipt (ADR) program in the United States, which, as of September 20, 2010, has
allowed our ADRs to be traded on the over-the-counter (OTC) market in the United States under the symbol “BRCPY.”
In November 2012, we established a Level 2 American Depositary Receipt (ADR) program in the United States, which, as of November
8, 2012, has allowed our ADRs to be traded on New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol “LND.”
Capital
Stock
During
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, we acquired 3,557,900 common shares under the share buyback program, which accounted for
10.55% of our outstanding shares (excluding the shares held by the controlling shareholder).
During
the year ended June 30, 2017, we acquired a total of 1,345,400 common shares under our share buyback program, which accounted
for 3.99% of our shares outstanding (excluding the shares held by the controlling shareholder).
During
the year ended June 30, 2018, we acquired a total of 50,300 common shares under our share buyback program, which accounted for
0.15% of our shares outstanding (excluding the shares held by the controlling shareholder).
During
the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2020, we did not have a share buyback program in effect. Our last share buyback program was
approved on September 20, 2016 for a term of 18 months from September 21, 2016, ending, therefore, on March 21, 2018.
As
of June 30, 2020, our fully paid capital stock was R$699.8 million, divided into 62,104,301 registered book-entry common shares,
without par value. Our bylaws authorize our board of directors to increase our capital stock up to R$3.0 billion without shareholder
approval. Any capital increase in excess of such amount must be approved at a shareholders’ meeting.
Corporate
Purpose
Article
3 of our bylaws define our corporate purposes as including: (i) the development of agricultural and forestry activities and the
rendering of services directly or indirectly related thereto; (ii) the purchase, sale and lease of real estate properties in agricultural
and urban areas; (iii) the import and export of agricultural products, supplies and inputs; (iv) the brokering of real estate
transactions of any kind; (v) the holding equity investments in other companies and business ventures of any kind related to our
corporate purpose, either in Brazil or abroad; and (vi) the management of our own or third-party assets.
Share
Register
Banco
Itaú Unibanco S.A. holds the book-entry register of our common shares. Share transfers are made upon written instructions
of the transferor or court order, by charging the transferor’s share account and crediting the transferee’s account
by the appropriate amount.
Rights
of Common Shares
Our
capital stock consists exclusively of common shares. Each of our common shares entitles its holder to one vote at our shareholders’
meetings, and to receive pro rata dividends or other distributions. See “Item 8—Financial Information—Dividends
and Dividend Policy” for a description of distribution rights in connection with our common shares. Holders of our common
shares also have the right, subject to certain exceptions provided for in Brazilian corporate law, but not the obligation, to
subscribe to our future capital increases. Our shareholders are also entitled to share ratably our remaining assets in case we
are liquidated, after payment of all our liabilities.
Brazilian
corporate law awards our shareholders the following rights, which cannot be circumvented by bylaws amendments or majority resolutions
at shareholders’ meetings: (i) the right to participate in the distribution of profits; (ii) the right to participate equally
and ratably in any remaining residual assets in the event of liquidation of the company; (iii) preemptive rights in the event
of issuance of shares, convertible debentures or subscription warrants, except in certain specific circumstances, as set forth
in Brazilian corporate law (see “Item 10—Additional Information— Preemptive rights”); (iv) the right to
hold our management accountable, in accordance with the provisions of Brazilian corporate law; and (v) the right to withdraw in
the cases specified in Brazilian corporate law, including in the events of merger or consolidation, such as those described in
“Item 10— Additional Information—Withdrawal and Redemption Rights—Withdrawal Rights.”
Furthermore,
pursuant to our bylaws and in accordance with CVM and Novo Mercado rules and regulations, the direct or indirect transfer
of our control, either through one or a series of related transactions, is contingent upon the acquirer making a tender offer
to acquire all of our shares.
As
long as we are listed on the Novo Mercado, we may not issue preferred shares or participation certificates, and should
we decide to delist from the Novo Mercado, we must carry out a tender offer to acquire all shares traded on stock markets.
For further information, see “Item 10—Additional Information—Delisting from the Novo Mercado” below.
Warrants
On
March 15, 2006, our board of directors approved the issuance of warrants to our founding shareholders proportionally to their
subscription of shares during our capital increases. See “Item 10—Additional Information—Description of Outstanding
Warrants.”
Shareholders’
Meetings
Pursuant
to Brazilian corporate law, our shareholders have the power to take any action and approve any resolutions related to our activities
at shareholders’ meetings, provided that such meetings have been convened pursuant to the terms and procedures described
in Brazilian corporate law and in our bylaws. It is the exclusive prerogative of the annual shareholders’ meeting (assembleia
geral ordinária) to review management’s account of corporate activities; approve our financial statements; and
determine the allocation of our net income and the payment of dividends with respect to the previous fiscal year. Members of our
board of directors and fiscal council are also usually appointed at the annual shareholders’ meeting, although such appointments
may also take place at special shareholders’ meetings.
Our
shareholders may also convene special shareholders’ meetings, which may be held concurrently with the annual shareholders’
meeting or at any time of the year.
The
following actions, among others, may be taken exclusively at shareholders’ meetings: (i) approval of amendments to the bylaws;
(ii) approval of management accounts and financial statements; (iii) appointment and dismissal of members of our board of directors
and fiscal council; (iv) the establishment of the aggregate compensation of the board of directors, executive officers and fiscal
council; (v) approval of the company’s dissolution, motion for bankruptcy or judicial or out-of-court reorganization proceedings,
liquidation, merger, redistribution of assets and liabilities, or consolidation with any other company, and any share mergers;
(vi) approval of pro rata share distributions to current shareholders, stock splits and reserve stock splits; (vii) approval
of stock option plans and similar arrangements for our management and employees, and for the managers and employees of our direct
or indirect subsidiaries; (viii) approval of management’s proposals regarding allocation of net income and distribution
of dividends; (ix) approval of capital increase over the limit authorized in our bylaws; (x) appointment of liquidators and members
of the fiscal council during liquidation proceedings; (xi) approval of the cancellation of our registration as a publicly-held
company at CVM; (xii) approval of our delisting from the Novo Mercado listing segment; (xiii) approval of engagement of
an appraiser to evaluate the value of our shares in case of cancellation of our registration as a public company at CVM or our
delisting from the Novo Mercado listing segment; and (xiv) the passing of resolutions on any matter submitted to the shareholders’
meeting by our board of directors.
Shareholders’
meetings are not allowed to circumvent certain specific shareholder rights enumerated in Brazilian corporate law. See “Item
10— Additional Information—Rights of Common Shares,” above.
Quorum
As
a general rule, Brazilian corporate law provides the need of shareholders representing at least 25% of our voting capital stock
in order for a company to able to convene a shareholders’ meeting on first call, except if the meeting is called to amending
our bylaws, in which case two thirds of our voting capital stock shall be required on first call. In either case, if the applicable
quorum is not reached on first call, any percentage will suffice to convene the meeting on second call.
Approval
of resolutions at shareholders’ meetings generally requires the affirmative vote of shareholders representing at least the
majority of common shares attending the meeting, either in person or represented by a proxy. Non-voting shares are disregarded
for purposes of calculating the majority.
The
Novo Mercado listing rules require, for the approval of certain issues, such as to retain a specialized firm to prepare
a valuation report with respect to the value of our common shares in the event of delisting from the Mercado Novo listing segment
or cancelling our registration as a publicly- held company, the affirmative vote of shareholders representing at least the majority
of our issued and outstanding common shares (the “Outstanding Shares”) present at a shareholders’ meeting. In
such events, the shareholders’ meeting must count on the presence of shareholders representing at least 20% of our Outstanding
Shares on first call, or on the presence of any percentage of our Outstanding Shares on second call, with blank votes not taken
into account and with one vote entitled to each share. For these purposes, Outstanding Shares within the meaning set forth in
the Novo Mercado Participation Agreement and Novo Mercado listing segment regulations means all our issued and outstanding
shares, provide, however, with the exclusion of, (i) the shares held by any controlling shareholders or by affiliates of such
controlling shareholders, (ii) the shares held by our managers, and (iii) treasury shares. See “Item 10—Additional
Information—Delisting from the Novo Mercado” for additional information on this matter.
Notice
of Shareholders’ Meetings
Brazilian
corporate law requires that previous notice of any shareholders’ meeting be published on three different dates on federal
or state official gazette and another newspaper of high circulation in the state of the corporate offices. As a general rule,
our company publishes meetings notices on the Official Gazette of the state of São Paulo (Diário Oficial do Estado
de São Paulo) and the newspaper O Estado de São Paulo. The first notice must be published no later than 15 days
prior to the date of when meeting on first call is schedule to take place, and no later than eight days in advance to the date
of the shareholders’ meeting on second call. In certain circumstances, the CVM may require that the first notice for the
shareholders’ meeting to be published no later than 30 days prior to the shareholders’ meeting. Nevertheless, CVM
may also require, upon shareholder request, up to 15 additional days between such prior notice and any special shareholders’
meeting, in order to enable such shareholder to having enough time to analyze the matters to be discussed at the meeting. In addition,
our bylaws require that a shareholders’ meeting to be convened to decide on the cancellation of our registration as a public
company with the CVM or our delisting from the Novo Mercado listing segment must be called at least 30 days prior to the
shareholders’ meeting. The notice on the shareholders’ meeting must contain the agenda, date and venue of the meeting,
and (if applicable) the nature of the proposed bylaws amendments.
Venue
Our
shareholders’ meetings take place at our head office in the city of São Paulo, in the state of São Paulo.
Brazilian corporate law allows our shareholders to hold meetings in another location in the event of force majeure, provided that
the meetings are held in the city of São Paulo and the relevant notice includes a clear indication of the place where the
meeting will occur.
Who
May Call our Shareholders’ Meetings
As
a general rule, Shareholders’ meetings are called by our board of directors, although they may also be called by the following:
(i) any shareholder, if our directors fail to call a shareholders’ meeting within 60 days after the date they were required
to do so under applicable laws and our bylaws; (ii) holders of at least 5% of our capital stock, if our directors fail to call
a meeting within eight days following receipt of a justified request to call the meeting by those shareholders, indicating the
proposed agenda; (iii) holders of at least 5% of our capital stock if our directors fail to call a meeting within eight days after
receipt of a request to call the meeting to establish the fiscal council; and (iv) our fiscal council (if already established),
if our board of directors fails to call an annual shareholders’ meeting within one calendar month after the date it was
required to do so under applicable laws. The fiscal council (if already established) may also call a special shareholders’
meeting if it believes that there are important or urgent matters to be addressed.
Conditions
of Admission to a Shareholders’ Meeting
In
order to attend and vote at shareholders’ meetings, shareholders must identify themselves and, 72 hours before the meeting,
provide evidence of proper title to the voting shares, issued by the financial institution responsible for the bookkeeping of
our shares, no earlier than five days before expiration off the 72-hour deadline mentioned herein. A shareholder may be represented
at a shareholders’ meeting by a proxy, provided that such proxy has been appointed less than one year before the meeting.
Only attorneys, financial institutions, other shareholders, and our executive officers and directors can act as proxies for our
shareholders. An investment fund must be represented by its officers.
Management
and Fiscal Council
Pursuant
to our bylaws, and in accordance with Brazilian corporate law and the Novo Mercado listing rules, we are governed by our
board of directors (conselho de administração) and executive officers (diretoria).
Our
bylaws require that our board of directors comprise of at least of five and not less than to nine directors. Currently, our board
of directors has nine members, of which four are independent directors under the Novo Mercado listing rules, unrelated
to our principal shareholders or to us. Our board members are elected by our shareholders at the annual shareholders’ meeting,
for a period of two consecutive years, reelection being permitted. We have also recently suggested the inclusion of two alternate
members to comprise the board of directors in the event any of the sitting members resign.
According
to our bylaws, our board of directors may establish one or more technical or advisory committees for specific purpose and with
specific duties, whose members may or may not include our officers or executive officers. Our board of directors must establish
the rules applicable to those committees, including rules for their composition, mandates, compensation and operation. Such committees
are advisory committees and not deliberative by nature.
Brazilian
corporate law permits cumulative voting upon the request of holders of at least 10% of our voting capital. Each share is granted
as many votes as the number of board seats, and each shareholder has the option to cast his or her votes for one or more candidates.
However, pursuant to CVM Instruction No. 282, of June 26, 1998, the threshold to trigger multiple voting rights in publicly held
corporations may be reduced in proportion to the amount of capital stock, ranging from 5% to 10%. Shareholders representing 5%
of our voting capital may request the adoption of cumulative voting rights.
Under
applicable law, if there is no request for cumulative voting, the shareholders’ meeting will vote based on a previously
registered list, assuring shareholders that individually or collectively hold at least 15% of our common shares, in a separate
vote, the right to elect one director and his or her alternate. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at a meeting held on November 4,
2006, CVM Board has decided to maintain the interpretation of section 141, fifth paragraph, of Brazilian Federal Law No. 6,404/76
expressed at the meeting held on November 8, 2005 (CVM Case RJ2005/5664), which, in those cases whereupon the Company has only
issued shares with voting rights, the majority of holders holding at least 10% of the total voting shares will have the right
to elect and remove a member and his alternate from the Board of Directors, by a separate vote at the general meeting, excluding
the controlling shareholder.
If
cumulative voting is requested, each shareholder may vote for one or more board members. Each common share will entitle its holder
to one vote in the relevant shareholders’ meeting and each shareholder may cast votes for members as they wish.
Our
bylaws require that we have two to six executive officers. At the date of this annual report, we have two executive officers.
They are elected by our directors for a period of one year, with the possibility of reelection. Pursuant to Brazilian corporate
law, executive officers must be residents of Brazil, but do not need to be shareholders.
Pursuant
to our bylaws, our fiscal council is permanent, has the powers and attributions conferred upon it by law and is also incumbent
upon exercising the role of Audit Committee, in accordance with the Sarbanes Oxley Act and the rules issued by the SEC. The fiscal
council members are elected at the annual shareholders’ meeting with a term of office that extends through the following
annual shareholders’ meeting. Our fiscal council shall be comprised by three to five effective sitting members and their
alternates, who may or may not be shareholders. All members of our fiscal council are also required to sign an agreement to comply
with the Novo Mercado rules prior to assuming their roles. The current members of our fiscal council will exercise their
duties until the annual shareholders’ meeting to be held in 2021 to approve the management accounts and financial statements
for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2021.
Transactions
in Which Directors Have a Conflict of Interest
Pursuant
to Brazilian corporate law, our directors and executive officers may not:
|
●
|
give any gifts at
our expense, except for such reasonable gifts as are for the benefit of our employees or of the community in which we participate,
upon approval by our board of directors;
|
|
●
|
receive, by virtue
of his or her position, any direct or indirect personal benefit from third parties without authorization in our bylaws or
by our shareholders at a shareholders’ meeting;
|
|
●
|
borrow money or
property from us or use our property, services or credit for his or her own benefit or for the benefit of a company or third
party in which he or she has an interest, without the prior approval of our shareholders at a shareholders’ meeting
or of our board of directors;
|
|
●
|
take part in a corporate
transaction in which he or she has an interest that conflicts with our interests or in the deliberations undertaken by our
directors on the matter;
|
|
●
|
take advantage of
any commercial opportunity for his or her own benefit or for the benefit of a third party at the expense of the company when
he or she was informed about such opportunity by virtue of his or her position as a director;
|
|
●
|
fail to disclose
a business opportunity in our interests with a view to exploiting the opportunity for personal gain, or for the benefit of
a third party; and
|
|
●
|
acquire, in order
to resell for profit, a good or right that is essential to our business operations, or that we intend to acquire for ourselves.
|
The
compensation of our directors is determined by our shareholders at the annual shareholders’ meeting that approves the previous
fiscal year’s financial statements.
Allocation
of Net Income and Dividend Distributions
Before
each annual shareholders’ meeting, our directors and executive officers are required to recommend how to allocate our net
income, from the preceding financial year (if any). This allocation is subject to the approval of our shareholders. Brazilian
corporate law defines “net income” for any particular financial year as net income after income and social contribution
taxes for that financial year, net of any accumulated losses from prior financial years and any amounts allocated to employees’
and management’s participation in our net income in such financial year.
According
to our bylaws and Brazilian corporate law, net income for any given financial year will be allocated as follows: (i) 5% for the
formation of a legal reserve according to Brazilian corporate law, which is subject to a maximum limit of 20% of our capital stock
(in addition, if for any given financial year, the total amount of the legal reserve plus any amounts of capital reserves exceed
30% of our capital stock, additional contributions to the legal reserve will not be mandatory); (ii) payment of mandatory dividends,
which cannot be less than 25% of our adjusted net income. After payment of mandatory dividends, shareholders may decide to allocate
outstanding net income to form a statutory expansion and investment reserve in accordance with the additional requirements provided
for in our bylaws; and (iii) the remaining portion of the adjusted net income may be allocated for investment, based on the budget
approved by our general shareholders’ meeting. However, the remaining balance of the income reserves, excluding reserves
for unrealized profits and contingencies, must not exceed the value of our capital stock. If this limit is reached, a general
shareholders’ meeting will be held to determine whether such excess amount shall be allocated as a capital increase or a
distribution of dividends.
The
general shareholders’ meeting may grant to our directors and executive officers a participation in the distribution of our
profits, after deducting accumulated losses and provisions for income and social contribution taxes, in accordance with applicable
law.
Withdrawal
Rights
According
to Brazilian corporate law, shareholders are entitled to withdrawal rights if they dissent from the approval of the following
actions at any shareholders’ meeting: (i) the redistribution of assets and liabilities (pursuant to the conditions described
below); (ii) reduction in our mandatory dividends; (iii) change of our corporate form or purpose; (iv) our merger into, or consolidation
with, another company (as described below); and (v) our participation in a corporate group, as defined in Brazilian corporate
law, except in the event our shares are widely held and liquid, as described below; or (vi) our acquisition of the control of
any company, if the acquisition price exceeds the limits established by Brazilian corporate law, except in the event our shares
are widely held and liquid, as described below.
The
redistribution of assets and liabilities will only trigger withdrawal rights if it results in one of the following: (i) a change
in our corporate purpose, unless the spun-off assets and liabilities are transferred to an entity whose principal business purpose
is consistent with our corporate purpose; (ii) a reduction of the minimum mandatory dividend to be paid to shareholders; or (iii)
our participation in a corporate group (as defined in Brazilian corporate law).
In
cases where we: (i) merge into, or consolidate with, another company; (ii) become part of a corporate group (as defined in Brazilian
corporate law); (iii) acquire all shares of a company in order to make such company our wholly-owned subsidiary, or our shareholders
sell all of our shares to another company in order to make us a wholly-owned subsidiary of such company, pursuant to Article 252
of Brazilian corporate law; or (iv) acquire control of any company at an acquisition price that exceeds the limits established
under Article 256, paragraph 2 of Brazilian corporate law, our shareholders will not be entitled to withdrawal rights, if our
common shares are (a) part of the Bovespa Index or another stock exchange index, as defined by the CVM; and (b) widely held, such
that any controlling shareholders and their affiliates jointly hold less than 50% of the type or series of shares being withdrawn.
The
right to withdraw expires 30 days after the publication of the minutes of the relevant shareholders’ meeting. We are entitled
to reconsider any action giving rise to withdrawal rights for 10 days after the expiration of the aforementioned period if we
determine that the redemption of the shares of dissenting shareholders would jeopardize our financial situation.
Article
45 of Brazilian corporate law describes the amounts to be paid to shareholders who exercise their withdrawal rights. As a general
rule, the withdrawing shareholder will receive the value of the shares, based on the most recent audited balance sheet approved
by our shareholders, or, if lower, the economic value of the shares, based on an evaluation report prepared in accordance with
Brazilian corporate law. If the resolution giving rise to withdrawal rights is passed more than 60 days after the date of our
most recent balance sheet, dissenting shareholders may request that the shares be valued in accordance with a new balance sheet
dated no more than 60 days prior to the date of the resolution. In such case, we are obligated to pay 80% of the share value according
to the most recent balance sheet approved by our shareholders, and the balance within 120 days following the date of the resolution
of the shareholders’ meeting that gave rise to the withdrawal rights.
Liquidation
We
may be liquidated in accordance with the provisions of Brazilian law. In the event of our extrajudicial liquidation, a shareholders’
meeting will determine the manner of our liquidation, appoint our liquidator and our fiscal council that will function during
the liquidation period.
In
the event of our liquidation, the assets available for distribution to our shareholders would be distributed to our shareholders
in an amount equal to their pro rata share of our legal capital. If the assets to be so distributed are insufficient to fully
compensate our all of our shareholders for their legal capital, each of our shareholders would receive a pro rata amount (based
on their pro rata share of our legal capital) of any assets available for distribution.
Redemption
According
to Brazilian corporate law, we may redeem our shares pursuant to a resolution adopted at an extraordinary shareholders’
meeting by shareholders representing at least 50% of our capital stock. The redemption may be paid with our retained earnings,
revenue reserves or capital reserves.
Preemptive
Rights
Except
as described below, our shareholders have a general preemptive right to participate in any issue of new shares, in proportion
to its holding at such time. However, the conversion of debentures into shares, the granting of options to purchase or subscribe
for shares and the issue of shares as a result of the exercise of such options, are not subject to preemptive rights. Our shareholders
are also entitled to preemptive rights in any issue of convertible debentures or offerings of shares or warranties issued by us.
Shareholders have a period of at least 30 days after the publication of notice of the issue of shares, convertible debentures
and warrants to exercise their preemptive rights. In addition, such preemptive rights may be transferred or disposed of for value.
Under the terms of Article 172 of Brazilian corporate law and our bylaws, our board of directors may exclude preemptive rights
or reduce the exercise period with respect to the issue of new shares, debentures convertible into shares and warrants up to the
limit of our authorized share capital, if the distribution of those securities is conducted in a stock exchange, or through a
public offering, an exchange offer for shares or tender offer the purpose of which is to acquire control of another company. Please
refer to “Item 3—Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Offering and Our Common Shares—A
holder of our common shares not residing in Brazil might be unable to exercise preemptive rights with respect to the common shares”
for additional information on this matter.
Insider
Trading Regulations
We
comply with the restrictions on insider trading set forth in CVM Instruction No. 358, of January 3, 2002, as amended. The following
paragraphs contain a brief summary of certain of such restrictions.
An
issuer, any controlling shareholders, directors, officers and other members of management are prohibited from trading in any securities
issued by our company or derivatives related to such securities, if (i) they are in possession of material information regarding
our business, and such information has not been publicly disclosed; (ii) a transaction is pending for the acquisition or sale
of shares of our capital stock, by our company, subsidiaries or affiliates, or an option or mandate has been granted in connection
with any of such transactions; or (iii) our company intends to participate in a merger, consolidation or corporate reorganization,
the redistribution of assets and liabilities assets or change into a different form of legal entity; and (iv) such trading activity
would take place in the 15-day period prior to the filing of our quarterly financial statements (ITR) or annual financial statements
(DFP) with the CVM.
Individuals
who held management positions at the company and gained access to material information originating from developments occurred
before their departure from the company are also prohibited from engaging in such trading activities, from the date of their departure
from the company until (i) six months after their departure; or (ii) public disclosure of the material information; provided that
trading will remain prohibited as long as it may interfere with our business or adversely affect our financial condition or that
of our shareholders.
Acquisition
of Treasury Stock
An
issuer cannot acquire shares of its own capital stock, to hold as treasury stock or for cancellation purposes, if this acquisition
would: (i) reduce the issuer’s capital stock; (ii) require the use of funds in excess of the issuer’s profits or available
reserves, as described in its most recent balance sheet; (iii) manipulate the stock price, or use of any unfair trading practice;
or (iv) acquire shares that had not been fully paid by the respective holder, or that were owned by any controlling shareholders.
Furthermore, an issuer may not acquire shares of its own capital stock if a tender offer for its shares is pending.
The
amount of shares of our capital stock held by our company, or maintained by our affiliates and subsidiaries in treasury cannot
exceed 10% of the total outstanding shares of our capital stock.
We
may only purchase shares of our own capital stock at a stock exchange. Private purchases are only permitted if previously approved
by the CVM, or if we have cancelled our registration as a public company with the CVM. We can purchase and sell put and call options
on our shares without restrictions at any time.
Restrictions
on Activities Inconsistent with our Corporate Purpose
Any
transactions in which we participate that are inconsistent with our corporate purpose are not enforceable against our company,
pursuant to Brazilian corporate law, including any forms of collateral or guarantees unrelated to our corporate purpose or in
violation of our bylaws.
Disclosure
of Trading of our Shares by an Issuer, any Controlling Shareholders, Directors, Officers or Members of the Fiscal Council
An
issuer’s directors and officers and members of its fiscal council, when active, as well as members of any other technical
or advisory committee, are required to disclose to its investor relations officer, who will disclose to the CVM and B3, the number
and type of securities issued by the issuer, its publicly-held subsidiaries or controlled companies, including derivatives (in
case of any controlling shareholders) held by them or by persons related to them, as well as any alteration in their respective
interests within 10 days as from the end of the month in which trading takes place.
In
addition, the Novo Mercado listing rules require any controlling shareholders to provide the same information in relation
to securities issued by the issuer, including derivatives, and to disclose their plans for future trading. Information on trading
of an issuer’s securities should include:
|
●
|
name and identification
of the acquirer;
|
|
●
|
number, price, kind
or class, in the event of traded shares, or characteristic, in the event of other securities; and
|
|
●
|
form of acquisition
(private transaction, trading on stock exchange, etc.).
|
Pursuant
to CVM Instruction No. 358, if an issuer’s controlling shareholders or any person or company, whether individually or together
with a group of persons or entities sharing similar interests, should directly or indirectly increase their interest in an issuer’s
capital stock by at least 5% percent, such persons or entities must disclose to us the following information:
|
●
|
the name and identification
of the person providing the information;
|
|
●
|
the number, price,
kind or class, in the event of acquired shares, or characteristics, in the event of other securities;
|
|
●
|
form of acquisition
(private transaction, trading on stock exchange, etc.);
|
|
●
|
the reasons and
purpose of the transaction; and
|
|
●
|
information regarding
any agreement regulating the exercise of voting rights or the purchase and sale of our securities.
|
Disclosure
of Information
We
are subject to the reporting requirements established by Brazilian corporate law and the regulations of the CVM. In addition,
as a result of our listing on the Novo Mercado, we must comply with the disclosure requirements under Novo Mercado regulations.
Information Required by the CVM
Brazilian corporate
law, securities regulations of the CVM and the rules for listing on the Novo Mercado require that publicly held corporations
file the following periodic information with the CVM and the B3:
|
●
|
financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Brazil (“Brazilian GAAP”) and related management and auditors’ reports, within three months from the end of the fiscal year or on the date on which they are published or made available to our shareholders, whichever occurs first, together with the Demonstrações Financeiras Padronizadas (a report on a standard form containing relevant financial information derived from our financial statements required to be filled out by us and filed with the CVM);
|
|
●
|
notices, filed on the same date as their publication, of our annual shareholders’ meeting;
|
|
●
|
a summary of the decisions made at annual shareholders’ meetings, filed on the day following the meeting;
|
|
●
|
a copy of the minutes of the annual shareholders’ meeting, filed within ten days from the date the meeting is held;
|
|
●
|
ITR, a quarterly report on a standard form containing our relevant quarterly corporate, business and financial information, together with a special review report issued by our independent auditor, filed within 45 days from the end of each quarter (except for the last quarter of each year) or upon disclosure of such information to shareholders or third parties, whichever occurs first;
|
|
●
|
Formulário de Referência, filed within five months from the end of each corporate year and in the event a request to conduct public offering is filed with the CVM;
|
|
●
|
Formulário Cadastral, which must be updated within seven business days if any of the information contained therein is modified;
|
|
●
|
management report within one month before a shareholders’ meeting is scheduled to occur, giving notice that certain management documents, as required by Brazilian corporate law, are available to shareholders; and
|
|
●
|
any documents deemed necessary for shareholders to exercise their voting rights.
|
In addition to the foregoing,
we must also file the following information with the CVM and the B3:
|
●
|
notices, filed on the same date of their publication, of our extraordinary or special shareholders’ meetings;
|
|
●
|
a summary of the decisions made at extraordinary or special shareholders’ meetings, filed on the day following the meeting;
|
|
●
|
minutes of our extraordinary or special shareholders’ meetings, filed within ten days from the date they are held;
|
|
●
|
a copy of any shareholders’ agreement, filed on the date on which it is registered with us;
|
|
●
|
any press release giving notice of material facts, filed on the date the release is published in the press;
|
|
●
|
information on any filing for corporate reorganization, the reason for such filing, special financial statements prepared for obtaining a legal benefit, and, if applicable, any plan for payment of holders of debentures, as well as copies of any judicial decision granting such request, filed concurrently with the corporate reorganization and on the date we take notice of it;
|
|
●
|
information on any bankruptcy filing, on the same day we become aware of it, or the filing of a judicial claim, as applicable;
|
|
●
|
a copy of any judicial decision granting a bankruptcy request and appointing a bankruptcy trustee, filed on the date we take notice of it; and
|
|
●
|
other information as requested by the CVM.
|
Information Required by the B3 from
Companies Listed on the Novo Mercado
In addition to the disclosure
obligations imposed by Brazilian corporate law and the CVM, we also must comply with the following additional disclosure requirements
under Novo Mercado regulations:
|
●
|
no later than six months following our listing on the Novo Mercado, we must disclose financial statements and consolidated financial statements at the end of each quarter (except the last quarter of each year) and at the end of each fiscal year, including a cash-flow statement which must indicate, at a minimum, the changes in our cash and cash equivalents, divided into operating, finance and investment cash flows;
|
|
●
|
from the date on which we release our financial statements relating to the second fiscal year following our listing on the Novo Mercado we must, no later than four months after the end of the fiscal year: (i) prepare our annual financial statements and consolidated financial statements, if applicable, in accordance with U.S. GAAP, or IFRS, in reais or U.S. dollars, in the English language, together with (a) management reports, (b) notes to the financial statements, including information on net income and shareholders’ equity calculated at the end of such fiscal year in accordance with Brazilian GAAP, as well as management proposals for allocation of net profits, and (c) our independent auditors’ report; or (ii) disclose, in the English language, complete financial statements, management reports and notes to the financial statements, prepared in accordance with Brazilian corporate law, accompanied by (a) an additional explanatory note regarding the reconciliation of year-end net income and shareholders’ equity calculated in accordance with Brazilian GAAP and U.S. GAAP or IFRS, as the case may be, which must include the main differences between the accounting principles used, and (b) the independent auditors’ report; and
|
|
●
|
from the date on which we release our first financial statements prepared as provided above, no later than 15 days following the term established by law for the publication of quarterly financial information, we must disclose, in its entirety, our quarterly financial information translated into the English language or disclose our financial statements and consolidated financial statements in accordance with Brazilian GAAP, U.S. GAAP or IFRS as provided above, accompanied by the independent auditors’ report.
|
In addition, we must disclose
the following information together with our ITR:
|
●
|
our consolidated balance sheet, consolidated statement of operations, and a discussion and analysis of our consolidated performance, if we are obliged to disclose consolidated financial statements at year-end;
|
|
●
|
any direct or indirect ownership interest exceeding 5% of our capital stock, considering any ultimate individual beneficial owner;
|
|
●
|
the number and characteristics, on a consolidated basis, of our shares held directly or indirectly by our principal shareholders, members of our board of directors, board of executive officers and fiscal council;
|
|
●
|
changes in the numbers of our shares held by the principal shareholders, members of our board of directors, board of executive officers and fiscal council in the immediately preceding 12 months;
|
|
●
|
in an explanatory note, our cash-flow statement and consolidated cash-flow statement, which should indicate the cash flow changes in cash balance and cash equivalent, separated into operating, finance and investment cash flows;
|
|
●
|
the number of free-float shares, and their percentage in relation to the total number of issued shares; and
|
|
●
|
the existence of arbitration provision for disputes arising between us and principal shareholders, directors, executive officers and members of the fiscal council before the Market Arbitration Chamber of B3.
|
The following information must
also be included in the company’s Formulário de Referência:
|
●
|
information relating to the ownership interest exceeding 5% of our capital stock, number and characteristics, on a consolidated basis, of the company’s shares directly or indirectly held by the principal shareholders and members of the board of directors, executive officers and fiscal council;
|
|
●
|
changes in the number of securities held by such persons within the immediately preceding 12 months;
|
|
●
|
the number of free-float shares and their respective percentage in relation to the total amount of shares issued; and
|
|
●
|
submission to arbitration.
|
Disclosure of Material Information
According to Law No.
6,385, of December 7, 1976, as amended, and the rules published by the CVM, we must disclose any material information (fato
relevante) related to our business to the CVM and the B3 and publish a notice of such material information. Material information
consists of any decision by the principal shareholders, any resolution taken by our board of directors, by the executive officers
or by the shareholders in a shareholders meeting, or any other act or fact of political, technical, managerial, economic or financial
nature occurring or related to us that could materially influence the price of our securities, the decision of investors to buy,
sell or hold our securities, or the investors’ decision to exercise any rights deriving from our securities.
Under special circumstances,
we may request confidential treatment by the CVM of certain material developments affecting us.
Going Private Process
A public company may
become a private company if it or any controlling shareholders conduct a public tender offer for the acquisition of all of the
issuer’s outstanding common shares in accordance with the rules and regulations of Brazilian corporate law, the CVM and the
Novo Mercado listing segment which, among other things, require that the offering price be the fair value of our common
shares, as defined pursuant to a valuation report, and that holders of common shares representing more than two thirds of the outstanding
common shares should have agreed to the delisting or accepted the offer; provided, however, that for such purposes outstanding
common shares shall mean common shares the holders of which shall have enrolled to participate in the offer.
The minimum offering
price shall correspond to the fair value of our common shares, as determined in a valuation report prepared by specialized and
independent firm of recognized experience.
Pursuant to Brazilian
corporate law, fair value is defined as the valuation of our Company, determined based on individually or in the aggregate, shareholders’
equity, shareholders’ equity valued at market price, discounted cash flow, comparison by multiples, the market price of shares
issued by us, or any other valuation method accepted by the CVM. Shareholders holding at least 10.0% of our outstanding common
shares may require our management to call a special shareholders’ meeting to determine whether to perform another valuation
using the same or a different valuation method. This request must be made within 15 days following the disclosure of the price
to be paid for the common shares in the public offering. The shareholders that make such request, as well as those voting in its
favor, must reimburse us for any costs involved in preparing the new valuation, if the new valuation price is not higher than the
original valuation price. If the new valuation price is higher than the original valuation price, the public offering must either
be cancelled or carried out at the higher price, and this decision must also be disclosed to the market.
Pursuant to our bylaws
and the Novo Mercado listing rules, the minimum price per share in the public offer to be conducted to purchase our outstanding
common shares for purposes of going private, must correspond to the fair value of our common shares as determined in a valuation
report prepared by a specialized and independent firm of recognized experience, chosen at a shareholders’ meeting from a
list of three institutions presented by our board of directors, pursuant to a decision of our Company, our directors and officers
or shareholders.
Delisting from the Novo Mercado
We may at any time
delist our common shares from the Novo Mercado, provided that shareholders representing the majority of our common shares
approve the action and that we give at least 30 days written notice to the B3. Our delisting from the Novo Mercado would
not result in the loss of our registration as a public company with the B3.
If the shareholders’
meeting decides to delist in order for an issuer’s common shares to be tradable outside the Novo Mercado, or as a
result of a corporate reorganization in which the surviving company is not listed on the Novo Mercado, the issuer’s
controlling shareholders or group of controlling shareholders should conduct a tender offer to purchase the issuer’s outstanding
common shares. In any such event, the offering price per common share should be no less than the fair value of our common shares,
as determined in a valuation report prepared by a specialized and independent firm of recognized experience, chosen at a shareholders’
meeting from a list of three institutions presented by our board of directors, pursuant to a decision of shareholders representing
at least the majority of the issuer’s outstanding shares present at such a shareholders’ meeting, with blank votes
not taken into account and with one vote entitled to each share. All the expenses and costs incurred in connection with the preparation
of the valuation report must be paid by any controlling shareholders or the issuer, as offerors.
In the event of delisting
from the Novo Mercado, any controlling shareholders must conduct a tender offer to acquire common shares from the other
shareholders at fair value, pursuant to the Novo Mercado listing rules and according to applicable legislation and regulation.
Such tender offer must be disclosed to the B3 and the market immediately after the company receives notice regarding the termination
of the agreement for participation in the Novo Mercado listing segment.
According to the Novo
Mercado listing rules, in the event of a transfer of our control within 12 months following our delisting from the Novo
Mercado, the acquirer of control and the seller of control must offer to purchase the common shares of all other holders of
our common shares for the same price, terms and conditions offered to the seller of control, adjusted for inflation. Furthermore,
in the event the price received by any controlling shareholders for their common shares is higher than the value of the public
offering conducted, the selling controlling shareholders and the acquirer will be required to jointly pay the difference to the
acceptors of the respective public offering.
If our common shares
are delisted from the Novo Mercado, we will not be permitted to have common shares listed on the Novo Mercado for
a two-year period following the delisting date, unless there is a change in our control following this delisting from the Novo
Mercado.
Public Tender Offers
Our by-laws provide
that if any of the above-mentioned cases occur simultaneously, a single public tender offer will be conducted provided that the
procedures of all types of public tender offers are compatible, the target shareholders are not adversely affected and the CVM
authorizes it.
In addition, our by-laws
permit that we or the shareholders responsible for the public tender offer assure its execution through any shareholder, third
party and, if applicable, ourselves. Nevertheless, we or the responsible shareholder, as the case may be, are still responsible
for the public tender offer until its completion.
Arbitration
We, our shareholders,
our directors and officers, and the members of our fiscal council, when active, should submit to arbitration for any dispute relating
to the application, legality, effectiveness, interpretation, violation and effects of violation of the provisions in the agreement
for participation in the Novo Mercado listing segment, and to the Novo Mercado listing rules, the arbitration regulation
instituted by the B3, the provisions of Brazilian corporate law, our bylaws, the rules of the CMN and the Central Bank, the regulations
of the CVM and the B3 and other rules generally applying to the Brazilian capital markets. Any such dispute should be settled by
arbitration carried out before B3 Arbitration Chamber.
Change of Control
According to the Novo
Mercado listing rules, the sale of control over an issuer, in one transaction or in a series of successive transactions should
contemplate an obligation by the acquirer of control to conduct a tender offer for the acquisition of all other outstanding common
shares on the same terms and conditions offered for disposition of control so as to assure equal treatment among all of our shareholders.
For such purposes, any selling controlling shareholders and the acquirer shall inform the CVM and the B3 of the price and other
conditions of such sale.
A tender offer is also required:
|
●
|
when there is a significant assignment of share subscription rights or rights in other securities convertible into an issuer’s common shares, which results in the transfer of its control;
|
|
●
|
in case of an indirect transfer of an issuer’s control, through a transfer of control over any controlling shareholders; and
|
|
●
|
in case a shareholder acquires the issuer’s control pursuant to a private transaction for purchase of its common shares. In this event, the acquiring shareholder must conduct a tender offer for the acquisition of all the issuer’s outstanding common shares on the same terms and conditions offered disposition of control and must also reimburse the counterparties from whom it has acquired its common shares on the stock exchange in the six-month period preceding the transaction that resulted in a change in control. The reimbursement amount corresponds to the positive difference between the price paid to the seller of control and the adjusted price paid in transactions carried out on the stock exchange during this six-month period.
|
The buyer, if applicable,
should take all necessary measures to reconstitute the minimum 25% free float within six months of the acquisition.
The controlling shareholders
may not transfer the common shares to the purchaser of our control, and the issuer may not register the transfer of such common
shares, if the buyer fails to execute the controlling shareholders’ consent agreement (Termo de Anuência dos Controladores).
Moreover, the issuer will not register any shareholders’ agreement that regulates the exercise of control rights until the
signatories thereto execute the controlling shareholders’ consent agreement.
Diffused Control
Control of us is
deemed diffused if exercised by (i) a shareholder holding less than 50% of our capital stock; (ii) shareholders jointly holding
more than 50% of our capital stock, provided that each shareholder holds less than 50% of our capital stock, and (a) their respective
ownership of our common shares is not subject to voting rights agreement, (b) they are not under common control and (c) do not
represent a common interest; and (iii) shareholders holding less than 50% of our capital stock who have executed a shareholders’
agreement in respect of their ownership of our common shares.
Duties and Responsibilities of Controlling
and Others Shareholders
If one shareholder
or group of shareholders exercises in a permanent manner control over us, such shareholder or group of shareholders will be subject
to the duties and responsibilities of the Brazilian corporate law. On the other hand, if there is no such shareholder or group
of shareholders, we will be subject to diffused control. The diffused control is always transitory and shareholders can exercise
their control over us by using their voting rights, if there are shareholders in a sufficient number who can influence the decisions
taken at a general shareholders meeting. If our control is diffused according to the Brazilian corporate law, there are no specific
liability rules for each group of shareholders even if one shareholder or group of shareholder effectively exercises the diffused
control, since this diffused control is exercised with the approval of the other shareholders. Nevertheless, the rules concerning
shareholders’ liability, such as in abuse of voting rights and conflict of interests, apply to any company, including those
with diffused control.
In addition, the rules
of the Novo Mercado acknowledge that diffused control can involve a specific controlling shareholder, which is the one who
actually exercises it. The rules of the Novo Mercado also acknowledge the specific liability of a certain shareholder or
group of shareholders for misconduct.
According to the definition
of diffused control, certain obligations and responsibilities apply to certain groups of shareholders who are not necessarily identified
as controlling shareholders, such as the obligation to conduct a tender offer if such group of shareholders votes for delisting
from the Novo Mercado or if delisting occurs due to non-compliance with the obligations of the Novo Mercado listing
segment regulations. Therefore, if our control becomes diffused, all shareholders will be subject to the liability rules set forth
in the Brazilian corporate law. However, some specific rules and liabilities set forth in the Novo Mercado listing segment
regulations only apply for those shareholders who have the power to control our business, even though not formally identified as
controlling shareholders.
Protection against Shareholder Concentration
Our by-laws contain
a provision intended to avoid concentration of our shares in the hands of a small group of investors. This provision requires that
any shareholder who becomes an owner of our common shares, or certain other rights, in an amount greater than or equal to 20% of
our total capital stock (excluding any involuntary ownership interest additions arising from the cancellation of treasury shares
or capital decrease resulting from the cancellation of shares), within 60 days from the date of acquisition, is required to publicly
tender for all of our capital stock. Cresud, including the entities controlled by it or under its common control and their legal
successors (but excluding any acquirer of shares from Cresud and its successors) are not covered under this obligation, which applies
only to investors who acquired our shares after our listing in the Novo Mercado segment of B3 as of April 2006.
The percentage of 20%
is not applicable to a person who becomes the holder of our shares in a number greater than 20% of the total shares as a result
of (i) legal succession, provided that the shareholder sells the exceeding shares no later than 60 days as from the material event;
(ii) merger of another company into our company; (iii) merger of shares of another company into our company; or (iv) subscription
of shares, conducted in a primary offering, approved at the shareholders meeting, called by our board of directors, which proposal
for capital increase has determined the share price based on the economic value calculated according to an economic and financial
appraisal report conducted by a specialized company with renowned experience in publicly held companies.
Shareholders that acquire
20% of our common shares are obligated under this provision to: (i) make a tender offer to acquire the entirety our outstanding
issued shares; (ii) ensure that the tender offer is conducted in an auction held at the B3 (iii) offer to pay a price per share
as described below, and (iv) offer to pay cash in exchange for the shares, in reais.
The tender offer price
per share issued, provided that CVM regulations do not require the adoption of calculation criteria that would lead to a greater
acquisition price, in which case, such CVM criteria would prevail, shall not be less than the higher amount among: (i) the market
value of our share established in an expert valuation report prepared and approved by shareholders in accordance with our bylaws;
(ii) 150% of the share price established in the most recent capital increase made through public offering within the 24-month period
preceding the date on which the tender offer becomes mandatory, adjusted by the IPC-A index pro rata until actual payment;
or (iii) 150% of the average listing price of our shares during the 90-day period preceding the tender offer on the stock exchange
where they are mostly traded.
Launch of such a tender
offer does not preclude other shareholders, or even us, from launching a competing tender offer in accordance with the applicable
regulations.
In the event the acquiring
shareholder fails to perform the obligations set forth in our bylaws, our board of directors shall call a special shareholders’
meeting to approve the suspension of the shareholder rights of such defaulting shareholder, without prejudice to losses and damages
that may be claimed from it.
Any proposed amendment
to limit our shareholders’ right to conduct a tender offer or to exclude it will impose on the shareholder(s) voting in favor
of said amendment or exclusion at such shareholders’ meeting, the obligation of conducting such tender offer. Each shareholder
shall have the right to one vote in any special shareholders’ meeting called to decide on amendments or elimination of such
provisions of our bylaws.
Suspension of Rights of Acquiring Shareholders
for Violation of Our bylaws
In the event an acquiring
shareholder violates the provisions of our by-laws regarding the need to conduct a public tender offer in the event of a change
of our control or the acquisition of shares representing 15% or more of our common shares, the rights of such acquiring shareholder
will be suspended pursuant to a resolution passed at our shareholders’ meeting, which must be convened in the event of such
noncompliance. The acquiring shareholder will not be entitled to vote at such meeting.
Public Meeting with Analysts
Pursuant to Novo
Mercado regulations, at least once a year we must hold a public meeting with analysts and any other interested parties to disclose
information regarding our projects and forecasts, as well as our economic and financial situation.
Annual Calendar
Pursuant to the Novo
Mercado regulations, we must, by the end of January of each year, publicly disclose and send to the B3 an annual calendar with
a schedule of our corporate events. Any subsequent modification to such schedule must be immediately and publicly disclosed and
sent to the B3.
Duty to Disclose Related Party Transactions
Pursuant to the Novo
Mercado regulations, we must publicly disclose and send to the B3 information about any contract between us and our related
parties or managers of our related parties, whenever the amount of such contract in any one-year period reaches the greater of
R$0.2 million or 1% of our shareholders’ equity.
The disclosure must
specify the contract’s object, term, amount, termination conditions and impact, if any, on our business and management. Additionally,
pursuant to CVM rules, in the event a related party has interest in the approval of any matter by our shareholders at a shareholders’
meeting, we must inform our shareholders of at least: the name and qualifications of the related party; the relationship between
us and the related party; the amount of our common shares and other securities, directly or indirectly, held by the related party;
all credits and amounts outstanding between us and the related party; a description of the transaction submitted to shareholders’
meeting approval; management’s recommendation in relation to the proposed related party transaction, indicating our advantages
and disadvantages; and, in the event of an intercompany transaction, an affirmation by our management that the transaction was
conducted at an arms-length basis or that the compensation is appropriate, and analysis of the related party transaction’s
terms and conditions in relation to the terms and conditions of similar transactions entered into by third parties. See “Item
7—Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions.”
Description of Outstanding Warrants
On March 15, 2006,
our board of directors approved the issuance to our founding shareholders of two series of warrants to acquire our common shares.
The first series of such warrants, or “First Series Warrants,” consists of 256,000 warrants, and the second series,
or the “Second Series Warrants,” consists of an additional 256,000 warrants. Such warrants were delivered to our founding
shareholders in proportion to their respective interests in our capital stock on the date such warrants were issued. The First
Series Warrants grant their holders the right to acquire such number of our common shares as will represent 20% of our total capital
stock on the date such warrants are exercised, and the Second Series Warrants grant their holders the right to acquire such number
of our common shares as will represent an additional 20% of our total capital stock on the date such warrants are exercised. We
believe that these warrants are an incentive and contribute to ensure our founding shareholders’ commitment towards the development
of our activities and the implementation of the business plan prepared by them.
First Series Warrants
The First Series Warrants
will grant their holders the right to acquire our common shares at an exercise price of R$1,000 per share which was the issue price
per share in our 2006 initial public offering, subject to the price adjustment described below.
We believe that the
First Series Warrants represent an efficient mechanism of compensating our founding shareholders as those securities will only
represent an economic gain in a scenario of a rising share price for our shares. The remuneration provided by the First Series
Warrants will not interfere with our results or financial condition as a gain to our founding shareholders will be generated by
market conditions. The principal terms of the First Series Warrants are as follows:
Series and Right to Acquire
Common Shares
The First Series Warrants
were issued in three sub-series, which differ in relation to the date on which their respective rights to acquire shares becomes
effective. All three sub-series of the First Series Warrants are currently exercisable and tradable. The First Series Warrants
expire on the date 15 years after the publication in Brazil of the notice of completion of our initial public offering (Anúncio
de Encerramento), which notice was published on May 15, 2006.
Warrant Shares
Each lot of 1,000 warrants
of the First Series Warrants originally entitled its respective holder to acquire one of our common shares, subject to the adjustments
described in “Item 10—Additional Information—Adjustment of the Number of Common Shares for Subscription”
below.
Adjustment of the Number
of Common Shares for Subscription
If we issue shares
that do not result from the exercise of the rights conferred under the warrants, the number of shares to which the warrants grant
rights will be adjusted. Such increase in the number of shares that may be acquired by the holders of the warrants shall be proportional
to such number of shares newly issued by us in relation to the number of shares existing before such issuance. Accordingly, holders
of warrants whose rights had not yet been exercised shall be entitled to maintain the right to subscribe the same percentage interest
in our capital stock as they were entitled to prior to such new issuance. The number of shares granted upon the exercise of the
warrants will also be adjusted in order to reflect capital reductions, stock splits, reverse stock splits and share bonuses transactions,
if any. Such adjustments will also apply to the issue of new warrants, debentures or other securities convertible into our common
shares.
Exercise Price
The exercise price
of the First Series Warrants was originally equivalent to the issue price per share in our 2006 initial public offering, i.e.,
R$1,000.00 (a thousand reais) per share. However, such exercise price is subject to certain adjustments and restatements
as set forth at our board of directors meeting held on March 15, 2006.
If new shares that
do not result from the exercise of our warrants are issued, the exercise price of the warrants shall be adjusted to reflect the
price per share of such subsequent offerings. Such calculation will be made based on: (i) the total amount in reais of our
capital stock after our 2006 initial public offering, excluding amounts relating to retained profits converted into equity, plus
(ii) the total proceeds in reais received by us from any subsequent issuance of shares after our 2006 initial public offering
that do not result from any exercise of our warrants, divided by (iii) the total number of shares outstanding after our 2006 initial
public offering in addition to the shares issued thereafter, not including any shares issued as a result of any exercise of our
warrants. The exercise price resulting from the application of such rules is also subject to the adjustment procedures set forth
in the following paragraph.
Exercise Price Adjustment
For purposes of adjustment
of the exercise price of the First Series Warrants, the amounts set forth in items (1) and (2) in the paragraph above shall be
adjusted, respectively, from (a) the date of the announcement of commencement of our 2006 initial public offering and (b) the date
of each new issuance of shares made by us that does not result from any exercise of our warrants, based on the Compounded Consumer
Price Index (IPC-A), during the period, if such periods are equal to or longer than 12 months. On June 30, 2020, the exercise price
of the First Series Warrants was R$20.66 per share.
Exercise of Rights
The First Series Warrants
may be exercised by their holders upon at least five business day advance notice to us.
Characteristics
of the Common Shares for Subscription
The shares to be acquired
pursuant to the First Series Warrants will be entitled to the same rights granted to other shares.
Holders of First Series
Warrants
As of September 30,
2020, the holders of our First Series Warrants were:
Holder
|
|
Number
|
|
|
%
|
|
Agro Managers
|
|
|
4,364
|
|
|
|
1.70
|
|
Cape Town LLC
|
|
|
64,000
|
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
Cresud
|
|
|
177,004
|
|
|
|
69.14
|
|
Others
|
|
|
10,632
|
|
|
|
4.15
|
|
Total
|
|
|
256,000
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Second Series Warrants
The Second Series Warrants
grant their holders the right to acquire our common shares only in the event of (i) a transfer of control in accordance with our
bylaws, the Novo Mercado listing regulations and CVM rules, (ii) the acquisition of a significant interest in our capital
stock in accordance with our bylaws, or (iii) a mandatory tender offer in accordance with CVM regulations. In any of these events,
a tender offer for the acquisition of all of our shares must be made. The exercise price for the shares underlying the Second Series
Warrants will be equal to the price established in such tender offer.
The purpose of creating
the Second Series Warrants was to provide our founding shareholders with a mechanism that would allow them under certain circumstances
to maintain their interest in our capital stock. The principal terms of the Second Series Warrants are described below.
Series and Right to Acquire
Common Shares
The Second Series Warrants
were issued on March 15, 2006. The Second Series Warrants expire on the date 15 years after the publication in Brazil of the notice
of completion of our initial public offering (Anúncio de Encerramento), which notice was published on May 15, 2006.
The Second Series Warrants may be exercised by their holders only under the following circumstances:
Transfer of control:
In the event of a transfer of control of our company, as prescribed by articles 41, 42 and 43 of our by-laws, the Novo Mercado
listing regulations and CVM rules, provided that the resulting business or business group has no direct participation of our
founding shareholders or persons related to them. The Second Series Warrants in this case must be exercised within ten business
days of the publication of the tender offer made in connection with such transfer of control.
Acquisition of significant
interest: In the event of an acquisition by any shareholder, individually or jointly with other shareholders, of an interest
in our company representing an amount equal to or greater than 20% of our capital stock, as prescribed by article 44 of our by-laws,
provided that the resulting business or business group has no direct participation of our founding shareholders or persons related
to them. The Second Series Warrants in this case must be exercised within ten business days of the publication of the tender offer
made in connection with such acquisition of a significant interest.
Mandatory tender
offer in accordance with CVM rules: In the event a mandatory tender offer is made for our shares under CVM regulations, provided
that the resulting business or business group has no direct participation of our founding shareholders or persons related to them.
The Second Series Warrants in this case must be exercised within ten business days of the publication of such mandatory tender
offer.
Transferability
The Second Series Warrants
may be transferred only among our founding shareholders, their controlling shareholder or their affiliates.
Warrant Shares
Each lot of 1,000 warrants
of the Second Series Warrants originally entitled its respective holder to acquire one of our common shares, subject to the adjustments
described in “Item 10—Additional Information—Adjustment of the Number of Common Shares for Subscription”
below.
Adjustment of the Number
of Common Shares for Subscription
If we issue shares
that do not result from the exercise of the rights conferred under the warrants, the number of shares to be issued upon exercise
of the warrants will be adjusted. Such increase in the number of shares that may be subscribed by the holders of the warrants shall
be proportional to such number of shares newly issued by us in relation to the number of shares existing before such issuance.
Accordingly, holders of warrants whose preemptive rights had not yet been exercised shall be entitled to maintain the right to
subscribe the same percentage interest in our capital stock as they were entitled to prior to such new issuance. The number of
shares granted upon the exercise of the warrants will also be adjusted in order to reflect capital reductions, stock splits, reverse
stock splits and share bonuses transactions, if any. Such adjustments will also apply to the issue of new warrants, debentures
or other securities convertible into our common shares.
Exercise Price
The exercise price
of the Second Series Warrants will be equal to the tender offer prices described above under “—Second Series Warrants.”
Exercise of Rights
The right conferred
by the Second Series Warrants may be exercised by their holders by sending notice to us within ten business days from the date
of the public announcement of the applicable tender offer. The Second Series Warrants may be exercised only if our founding shareholders
continue to own in the aggregate at least 80% of the number of shares held by them immediately after consummation of our 2006 initial
public offering. On the date hereof, our founding shareholders own 100% of the number of shares they held immediately after the
consummation of our 2006 initial public offering.
Characteristics of the
Common Shares for Subscription
The shares to be acquired
under the Second Series Warrants will be entitled to the same rights granted to our other shares.
Holders of Second Series
Warrants
As of September 30, 2020, the
holders of our Second Series Warrants were:
Holder
|
|
Number
|
|
|
%
|
|
Agro Managers
|
|
|
4,364
|
|
|
|
1.70
|
|
Cape Town LLC
|
|
|
64,000
|
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
Cresud
|
|
|
177,004
|
|
|
|
69.14
|
|
Others
|
|
|
10,632
|
|
|
|
4.15
|
|
Total
|
|
|
256,000
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Adjustment in the Event of a Corporate
Restructuring
In the event of any
corporate restructuring or similar action, apart from such events mentioned above and which may have an impact on or represent
a reduction of the rights of the holders of the First Series Warrants or the Second Series Warrants, it is stipulated in the meeting
of our board of directors held on March 15, 2006 that we shall use our best efforts to negotiate with the holders of the First
Series Warrants and Second Series Warrants, as appropriate, to set forth new exercise conditions, seeking to preserve the rights
originally granted to the holders of such warrants, their economic and corporate value, the amount of underlying shares and their
exercise price. For the purpose of such negotiation, decisions by the holders of the warrants shall be determined through a majority
vote, and the holders of the First Series Warrants and the Second Series Warrants shall negotiate and vote separately. Any disputes
will be submitted to the Arbitration Chamber of the B3 (Câmara de Arbitragem do Mercado) pursuant to our bylaws.
See “Item 4—Information
on the Company—Business Overview—Material Agreements.”
There are no restrictions
on ownership or voting of our capital stock by individuals or legal entities domiciled outside Brazil. However, the right to convert
dividend payments, interest on shareholders’ equity payments and proceeds from the sale of our capital stock into foreign
currency and to remit such amounts outside Brazil is subject to restrictions under foreign investment legislation and foreign exchange
regulations, which generally require, among other things, the registration of the relevant investment with the Central Bank and
the CVM.
Investments in our
common shares by (i) a holder not deemed to be domiciled in Brazil for Brazilian tax purposes, (ii) a non-Brazilian holder who
is registered with the CVM under Resolution No. 4,373, or (iii) the depositary, are eligible for registration with the Central
Bank. This registration (the amount so registered is referred to as registered capital) allows the remittance outside Brazil of
foreign currency, converted at the commercial market rate, acquired with the proceeds of distributions on, and amounts realized
through, dispositions of our common shares. The registered capital per common share purchased in the form of an American Depositary
Security, or ADS, or purchased in Brazil and deposited with the depositary in exchange for an ADS, will be equal to its purchase
price (stated in U.S. dollars). The registered capital per common share withdrawn upon cancellation of a Common ADS will be the
U.S. dollar equivalent of (1) the average price of a common share on the B3 on the day of withdrawal, or (2) if no common shares
were traded on that day, the average price on the B3 in the 15 trading sessions immediately preceding such withdrawal. The U.S.
dollar equivalent will be determined on the basis of the average commercial market rates quoted by the Central Bank on the relevant
dates.
Annex V Regulations
Resolution No. 1,927
of the National Monetary Council, as amended, provides for the issuance of depositary receipts in foreign markets in respect of
shares of Brazilian issuers. It restates and amends Annex V to Resolution No. 1,289 of the National Monetary Council, known as
the Annex V Regulations. The ADS program was approved under the Annex V Regulations by the Central Bank and the CVM prior to the
issuance of the ADSs.
Accordingly, the proceeds
from the sale of ADSs by ADR holders outside Brazil are not subject to Brazilian foreign investment controls, and holders of the
ADSs who are not resident in a Tax Haven Jurisdiction are entitled to favorable tax treatment. See “Item 10—Additional
Information—Taxation— Brazilian Tax Considerations.”
We pay dividends and
other cash distributions with respect to our common shares in reais. We have obtained an electronic certificate of foreign
capital registration from the Central Bank in the name of the depositary with respect to our ADSs to be maintained by the custodian
on behalf of the depositary. Pursuant to this registration, the custodian is able to convert dividends and other distributions
with respect to our common shares represented by ADSs into foreign currency and remit the proceeds outside Brazil to the depositary
so that the depositary may distribute these proceeds to the holders of record of the ADSs.
Investors residing
outside Brazil may register their investments in our shares as foreign portfolio investments under Resolution No. 4,373 (described
below) or as foreign direct investments under Law No. 4,131 (described below). Registration under Resolution No. 4,373 or Law No.
4,131 generally enables non-Brazilian investors to convert dividends, other distributions and sales proceeds received in connection
with registered investments into foreign currency and to remit such amounts outside Brazil. Registration under Resolution No. 4,373
affords favorable tax treatment to non-Brazilian portfolio investors who are not resident in a Tax Haven Jurisdiction. See “Item
10—Additional Information—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations.”
In the event that a holder of
ADSs exchanges those ADSs for the underlying common shares, the holder must:
|
●
|
sell those shares on the B3 and rely on the depositary’s electronic registration for five business days from the date of exchange to obtain and remit U.S. dollars outside Brazil upon the holder’s sale of our common shares;
|
|
●
|
convert its investment in those shares into a foreign portfolio investment under Resolution No. 4,373; or
|
|
●
|
convert its investment in those shares into a direct foreign investment under Law No. 4,131.
|
The custodian is authorized
to update the depositary’s electronic registration to reflect conversions of ADSs into foreign portfolio investments under
Resolution No. 4,373.
If a holder of ADSs
elects to convert its ADSs into a foreign direct investment under Law No. 4,131, the conversion will be effected by the Central
Bank after receipt of an electronic request from the custodian with details of the transaction. If a foreign direct investor under
Law No. 4,131 elects to deposit its common shares into the relevant ADR program in exchange for ADSs, such holder will be required
to present to the custodian evidence of payment of capital gains taxes. The conversion will be effected by the Central Bank after
receipt of an electronic request from the custodian with details of the transaction. See “Item 10—Additional Information—Taxation—Brazilian
Tax Considerations” for details of the tax consequences to an investor residing outside Brazil of investing in our common
shares in Brazil.
If a holder of ADSs
wishes to convert its investment in our shares into either a foreign portfolio investment under Resolution No. 4,373 or a foreign
direct investment under Law No. 4,131, it should begin the process of obtaining its own foreign investor registration with the
Central Bank or with the CVM, as the case may be, in advance of exchanging the ADSs for the underlying common shares. A non-Brazilian
holder of common shares may experience delays in obtaining a foreign investor registration, which may delay remittances outside
Brazil, which may in turn adversely affect the amount, in U.S. dollars, received by the non-Brazilian holder.
Unless the holder has
registered its investment with the Central Bank, the holder may not be able to convert the proceeds from the disposition of, or
distributions with respect to, such common shares into foreign currency or remit those proceeds outside Brazil. In addition, if
the non-Brazilian investor resides in a Tax Haven Jurisdiction or is not an investor registered under Resolution No. 4,373, the
investor will be subject to less favorable tax treatment than a holder of ADSs. See “Item 10—Additional Information—Taxation—Brazilian
Tax Considerations.”
Resolution 4,373
On September 29, 2014,
the CMN issued Resolution No. 4,373, which provides for the new mechanism for non-resident investments in the Brazilian financial
and capital markets. Resolution No. 4,373 became effective on March 30, 2015. Resolution No. 4,373 was the prior mechanism for
that and its provisions were significantly the same as the ones described below.
All investments made
by a non-Brazilian investor under Resolution No. 4,373 are subject to an electronic registration with the Central Bank. This registration
permits non-Brazilian investors to convert dividend payments, interest on shareholders’ equity payments and proceeds from
the sale of our share capital into foreign currency and to remit such amounts outside Brazil.
Under Resolution No.
4,373, non-Brazilian investors registered with the CVM may invest in almost all financial assets and engage in almost all transactions
available to Brazilian investors in the Brazilian financial and capital markets without obtaining a separate Central Bank registration
for each transaction, provided that certain requirements are fulfilled. Under Resolution No. 4,373, the definition of a non-Brazilian
investor includes individuals, legal entities, mutual funds and other collective investment entities, domiciled or headquartered
outside Brazil.
Pursuant to Resolution
No. 4,373, non-Brazilian investors must:
|
●
|
appoint at least one representative in Brazil with powers to take action relating to its investments;
|
|
●
|
appoint an authorized custodian in Brazil for its investments, which must be a financial institution duly authorized by the Central Bank and CVM;
|
|
●
|
complete the appropriate foreign investor registration forms;
|
|
●
|
register as a non-Brazilian investor with the CVM;
|
|
●
|
register its investments with the Central Bank; and
|
|
●
|
obtain a taxpayer identification number from the Brazilian federal tax authorities.
|
The securities and
other financial assets held by a non-Brazilian investor pursuant to Resolution No. 4,373 must be registered or maintained in deposit
accounts or under the custody of an entity duly licensed by the Central Bank or the CVM or be registered in registration, clearing
and custody systems authorized by the Central Bank or by the CVM. In addition, the trading of securities held under Resolution
No. 4,373 is restricted to transactions carried out on stock exchanges or through organized over-the-counter markets licensed by
the CVM.
The offshore transfer
or assignment of the securities or other financial assets held by non-Brazilian investors pursuant to Resolution No. 4,373 are
prohibited, except for transfers resulting from a corporate reorganization effected abroad by a non-Brazilian investor, or occurring
upon the death of an investor by operation of law or will.
Law 4,131
To obtain a certificate
of foreign capital registration from the Central Bank under Law No. 4,131, a foreign direct investor must:
|
●
|
register as a foreign direct investor with the Central Bank;
|
|
●
|
obtain a taxpayer identification number from the Brazilian tax authorities;
|
|
●
|
appoint a tax representative in Brazil; and
|
|
●
|
appoint a representative in Brazil for service of process in respect of suits based on the Brazilian corporate law.
|
Foreign direct investors
under Law No. 4,131 may sell their shares in either private or open market transactions, but these investors will generally be
subject to less favorable tax treatment on gains with respect to our common shares. See “Item 10—Additional Information—
Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations.”
The following discussion
contains a description of the material Brazilian and U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition
of our common shares or ADSs. The following discussion does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all the tax considerations
that may be relevant to a decision to purchase, hold or dispose of our common shares or ADSs. This discussion is based upon the
tax laws of Brazil and the United States and regulations under these tax laws as currently in effect, which are subject to change.
Although there is at
present no income tax treaty between Brazil and the United States, the tax authorities of the two countries have had discussions
that may culminate in such a treaty. No assurance can be given, however, as to whether or when a treaty will enter into force or
how it will affect the U.S. holders of our common shares or ADSs.
Prospective purchasers
of our common shares or ADSs should consult their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and
disposition of our common shares or ADSs in their particular circumstances.
Brazilian Tax Considerations
The following discussion
contains a description of the material Brazilian tax consequences, subject to the limitations set forth herein, of the acquisition,
ownership and disposition of our common shares or ADSs by a holder not deemed to be domiciled in Brazil for purposes of Brazilian
taxation, or a Non-Resident Holder. This discussion is based on the tax laws of Brazil and regulations thereunder in effect on
the date hereof, which are subject to change (possibly with retroactive effect). This discussion does not specifically address
all of the Brazilian tax considerations that may be applicable to any particular Non-Resident Holder. Therefore, each Non-Resident
Holder should consult its own tax advisor about the Brazilian tax consequences of an investment in our common shares or ADSs.
Individuals domiciled
in Brazil and Brazilian companies are taxed in Brazil on the basis of their worldwide income which includes earnings of Brazilian
companies’ foreign subsidiaries, branches and affiliates. The earnings of branches of foreign companies and non-Brazilian
residents, or nonresidents, in general are taxed in Brazil only on income derived from Brazilian sources.
Dividends
Dividends paid by a
Brazilian corporation, such as us, including stock dividends and other dividends paid to a Non-Resident Holder of our common shares
or ADSs, are currently not subject to income tax withholding in Brazil to the extent that such amounts are related to profits generated
after January 1, 1996. Dividends paid from profits generated before January 1, 1996 may be subject to Brazilian income tax withholding
at varying rates, according to the tax legislation applicable to each corresponding year.
On September 16, 2013,
Brazilian tax authorities issued Normative Ruling 1,397/13, which, among other things, established rules regarding the withholding
tax exemption on dividend distributions. According to Normative Ruling 1,397/13, the withholding tax exemption on dividend income
would only be applicable to dividends distributed out of profits determined in accordance with Brazilian accounting rules that
were effective until December 31, 2007 (old Brazilian GAAP). In this sense, if (i) taxpayers make dividend distributions based
on new Brazilian accounting rules already conforming to IFRS principles, and (ii) such distributions are made in excess of the
dividends that could have been distributed had the profits been determined in accordance with Brazilian accounting rules that were
effective until December 31, 2007, the “excess distribution” would be deemed as taxable income in the hands of the
beneficiary and subject to withholding income tax at the rate of 15% or 25%.
With the enactment
of Law 12,973/14, this taxation has been eliminated, since this law determined the exemption of Income Tax on the excess distribution
of dividends provided that these have been assessed from 2008 to 2013 and from 2015 onwards. The risk for the dividends paid in
excess remains only with respect to profit accrued in 2014 for legal entities that have not opted for the advance of effects of
Law 12,973/14 for 2014, due to the provisions of RFB Regulatory Instruction 1,492/14.
Interest on Shareholders’ Equity
Law No. 9,249, of December
26, 1995, as amended, allows a Brazilian corporation, such as us, to make distributions to shareholders of interest on shareholders’
equity, and treat those payments as a deductible expense for purposes of calculating Brazilian corporate income tax, and, since
1997, social contribution tax on net profit as well, as long as the limits described below are observed. These distributions may
be paid in cash. For tax purposes, the deductible amount of this interest is limited to the daily pro rata variation of the TJLP,
as determined by the Central Bank from time to time, and the amount of the deduction may not exceed the greater of:
|
●
|
50% of net income (after the deduction of social contribution tax on net profit but before taking into account the provision for corporate income tax and the amounts attributable to shareholders as interest on shareholders’ equity) for the period in respect of which the payment is made; and
|
|
●
|
50% of the sum of retained profits and income reserves as of the date of the beginning of the period in respect of which the payment is made.
|
Payment of interest
on shareholders’ equity to a Non-Resident Holder is subject to withholding income tax at the rate of 15%, or 25% if the Non-Resident
Holder is domiciled in (i) a country or location that does not impose income tax, or (ii) where the maximum income tax rate is
lower than 20.0%, or (iii) a Tax Haven Jurisdiction. See “Interpretation of the Discussion of the Definition of “Tax
Haven Jurisdictions” below.
These payments of interest
on shareholders’ equity to a Non-Resident Holder may be included, at their net value, as part of any mandatory dividend.
To the extent payment of interest on shareholders’ equity is so included, we are required to distribute to shareholders an
additional amount to ensure that the net amount received by them, after payment of the applicable income tax withholding, plus
the amount of declared dividends, is at least equal to the mandatory dividend.
Payments of interest
on shareholders’ equity are decided by our shareholders, at our annual shareholders meeting, on the basis of recommendations
of our board of directors. No assurance can be given that our board of directors will not recommend that future distributions of
profits should be made by means of interest on shareholders’ equity instead of by means of dividends.
Taxation of Gains
Under Law No. 10,833/2003,
the gain on the disposition or sale of assets located in Brazil by a Non-Resident Holder, whether to another non-Brazilian resident
or to a Brazilian resident, may be subject to income tax withholding in Brazil.
With respect to the
disposition of our common shares, as they are assets located in Brazil, the Non-Resident Holder should be subject to income tax
on the gains assessed, following the rules described below, regardless of whether the transactions are conducted in Brazil or with
a Brazilian resident.
With respect to our
ADSs, although the matter is not entirely clear, arguably the gains realized by a Non-Resident Holder upon the disposition of ADSs
to another non-Brazilian resident will not be taxed in Brazil, on the basis that ADSs are not “assets located in Brazil”
for the purposes of Law No. 10,833/2003. We cannot assure you, however, that the Brazilian tax authorities or the Brazilian courts
will agree with this interpretation. As a result, gains on a disposition of ADSs by a Non-Resident Holder to a Brazilian resident,
or even to a non-Brazilian resident, in the event that courts determine that ADSs would constitute assets located in Brazil, may
be subject to income tax in Brazil according to the rules applicable to our common shares, described below.
As a general rule,
gains realized as a result of a disposition of our common shares or ADSs are the positive difference between the amount realized
on the transaction and the acquisition cost of our common shares or ADSs.
Under Brazilian law,
however, income tax rules on such gains can vary depending on the domicile of the Non-Resident Holder, the type of registration
of the investment by the Non-Resident Holder with the Central Bank and how the disposition is carried out, as described below.
Gains realized on a
disposition of shares carried out on a Brazilian stock exchange (which includes the organized over-the-counter market) are:
|
●
|
exempt from income tax when realized by a Non-Resident Holder that (1) has registered its investment in Brazil with the Central Bank under the rules of Resolution 4,373 (a “4,373 Holder”), and (2) is not a resident in a country or location which is defined as a Tax Haven Jurisdiction for those purposes; or
|
|
●
|
subject to income tax at a rate of 15% in the case of gains realized by (A) a Non-Resident Holder that (1) is not a 4,373 Holder and (2) is not a Tax Haven Jurisdiction resident; or by (B) a Non-Resident Holder that (1) is a 4,373 Holder, and (2) is a Tax Haven Jurisdiction resident. In this case, a withholding income tax of 0.005% shall be applicable and withheld by the intermediary institution (i.e. a broker) that receives the order directly from the Non-Resident Holder, which can be later offset against any income tax due on the capital gain earned by the Non-Resident Holder; and
|
|
●
|
subject to income tax at a rate of up to 25% in any other case, including a case of gains assessed by a Non-Resident Holder that is not a 4,373 Holder, and is a Tax Haven Jurisdiction resident for this purpose (as described below). In these cases, a withholding income tax of 0.005% of the sale value will be applicable and can be later offset with the eventual income tax due on the capital gain.
|
In the case of redemption
of securities or capital reduction by a Brazilian corporation, such as us, the positive difference between the amount effectively
received by the Non-Resident Holder and the corresponding acquisition cost is treated, for tax purposes, as capital gain derived
from sale or exchange of shares not carried out on a Brazilian stock exchange market, and is therefore subject to income tax at
the rate of 15% or 25%, as the case may be.
The deposit of our
common shares in exchange for ADSs will be subject to Brazilian income tax if the acquisition cost of the shares is lower than
(1) the average price per share on a Brazilian stock exchange on which the greatest number of such shares were sold on the day
of deposit, or (2) if no shares were sold on that day, the average price on the Brazilian stock exchange on which the greatest
number of shares were sold in the 15 trading sessions immediately preceding such deposit. In such case, the difference between
the acquisition cost and the average price of the shares calculated as above will be considered to be a capital gain subject to
income tax withholding at the rate of 15% or 25%, as the case may be. In some circumstances, there may be arguments to claim that
this taxation is not applicable in the case of a Non-Resident Holder that is a 4,373 Holder and is not a resident in a Tax Haven
Jurisdiction for this purpose. The availability of these arguments to any specific holder of our common shares will depend on the
circumstances of such holder. Prospective holders of our common shares should consult their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences
of the deposit of our common shares in exchange for ADSs.
Any exercise of preemptive
rights relating to our common shares or ADSs will not be subject to Brazilian taxation. Any gain on the sale or assignment of preemptive
rights relating to our common shares, including the sale or assignment carried out by the depositary, on behalf of Non-Resident
Holders of ADSs, will be subject to Brazilian income taxation according to the same rules applicable to the sale or disposition
of our common shares.
Interpretation of the Discussion of
the Definition of “Tax Haven Jurisdictions”
On November 28, 2014
Brazilian tax authorities enacted Normative Instruction No. 488 listing (i) the countries and jurisdictions considered Tax Haven
Jurisdictions (countries and jurisdictions that do not tax income or tax it at a rate below 17% or where the local legislation
does not allow access to information related to the shareholding composition of legal entities or to their ownership or to the
identity of the effective beneficiary of the income attributed to non-residents), and (ii) the privileged tax regimes, which definition
is provided by Law No. 11,727, of June 23, 2008. Although we believe that the best interpretation of the current tax legislation
could lead to the conclusion that the above mentioned “privileged tax regime” concept should apply solely for purposes
of Brazilian transfer pricing and thin capitalization rules, we cannot assure you whether subsequent legislation or interpretations
by the Brazilian tax authorities regarding the definition of a “privileged tax regime” provided by Law No. 11,727 will
also apply to a Non-Resident Holder on payments potentially made by a Brazilian source.
We recommend prospective
investors to consult their own tax advisors from time to time to verify any possible tax consequences arising of Normative Instruction
No. 1,037 and Law No. 11,727. If the Brazilian tax authorities determine that the concept of “privileged tax regime”
provided by Law No. 11,727 will also apply to a Non-Resident Holder on payments potentially made by a Brazilian source the withholding
income tax applicable to such payments could be assessed at a rate up to 25%.
Tax on Foreign Exchange Transactions
(IOF/Exchange Tax)
Brazilian law imposes
the IOF/Exchange Tax on the conversion of reais into foreign currency and on the conversion of foreign currency into reais.
Foreign exchange agreements entered into as from October 7, 2014 in connection with inflows of funds related to investments carried
out by Non- Resident Holders in the Brazilian financial and capital markets are subject to the IOF/Exchange Tax at a zero percent
rate. Foreign exchange transactions related to outflows of funds in connection with investments made in the Brazilian financial
and capital markets are subject to IOF/Exchange Tax at a zero percent rate. This zero percent rate applies to payments of dividends
and interest on shareholders’ equity to Non-Resident Holders with respect to investments in the Brazilian financial and capital
markets. Other than these transactions, the rate applicable to most foreign exchange transactions is 0.38%. Other rates may apply
to particular transactions and the Brazilian government may increase the rate at any time up to 25% on the foreign exchange transaction
amount. However, any increase in rates is only authorized to apply to future transactions.
Tax on Transactions Involving Bonds
and Securities (IOF/Securities Tax)
Brazilian law also
imposes the IOF/Securities Tax due on transactions involving bonds and securities, including those carried out on a Brazilian stock
exchange. The rate of the IOF/Securities Tax applicable to transactions involving our common shares is currently zero. However,
the rate of the IOF/Securities Tax applicable to the transfer of our common shares with the specific purpose of enabling the issuance
of ADSs is currently zero. This rate is applied on the product of (1) the number of shares which are transferred, multiplied by
(2) the closing price for those shares on the date prior to the transfer or, if such closing price is not available on that date,
the last available closing price for those shares. The Brazilian government may increase the rate of the IOF/Securities Tax at
any time up to 1.5% per day of the transaction amount, but only in respect of transactions carried out after the increase in rate
enters into force.
Other Brazilian Taxes
There are no Brazilian
inheritance, gift or succession taxes applicable to the ownership, transfer or disposition of our common shares or ADSs by a Non-Resident
Holder except for gift and inheritance taxes levied by some states in Brazil. There are no Brazilian stamp, issue, registration,
or similar taxes or duties payable by Non-Resident Holders of our common shares or ADSs.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
The following summary
describes the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership, and disposition of our common shares and
ADSs as of the date hereof. Except where noted, this discussion deals only with U.S. Holders (as defined below) that hold our common
shares or ADSs as capital assets for U.S. federal income tax purposes (generally, property held for investment). This summary does
not represent a detailed description of the U.S. federal income tax consequences applicable to you if you are subject to special
treatment under the U.S. federal income tax laws, including if you are:
|
●
|
a dealer in securities or currencies;
|
|
●
|
a financial institution;
|
|
●
|
a regulated investment company;
|
|
●
|
a real estate investment trust;
|
|
●
|
a tax-exempt organization;
|
|
●
|
a person that received our common shares or ADSs as compensation for the performance of services;
|
|
●
|
a person holding our common shares or ADSs as part of a hedging, integrated or conversion transaction or a straddle;
|
|
●
|
a person deemed to sell common shares or ADSs under the constructive sale provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”);
|
|
●
|
a trader in securities that has elected the mark-to-market method of accounting for your securities;
|
|
●
|
a person liable for alternative minimum tax;
|
|
●
|
a person who owns or is deemed to own 10% or more of our stock (by vote or value);
|
|
●
|
a partnership or other pass-through entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes;
|
|
●
|
a person required to accelerate the recognition of any item of gross income with respect to our common shares or ADSs as a result of such income being recognized on an applicable financial statement; or
|
|
●
|
a person whose “functional currency” is not the U.S. dollar.
|
As used herein, “U.S.
Holder” means a beneficial owner of our common shares or ADSs that is for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
|
●
|
an individual citizen or resident of the United States;
|
|
●
|
a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia;
|
|
●
|
an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or
|
|
●
|
a trust if it (1) is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (2) has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.
|
The discussion below
is based upon the provisions of the Code, and regulations, rulings and judicial decisions thereunder at the date hereof, and such
authorities may be repealed, revoked or modified (possibly on a retroactive basis) so as to result in U.S. federal income tax consequences
different from those discussed below. In addition, this summary is based, in part, upon representations made by the depositary
to us and assumes that the deposit agreement, and all other related agreements, will be performed in accordance with their terms.
If a partnership (or
other entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds our common shares or ADSs, the tax treatment
of a partner will generally depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. If you are a partner of
a partnership holding our common shares or ADSs, you should consult your tax advisors.
This summary does not
contain a detailed description of all the U.S. federal income tax consequences to you in light of your particular circumstances
and does not address the Medicare tax on net investment income or the effects of any state, local or non-U.S. tax laws.
If you are considering
the purchase, ownership or disposition of our common shares or ADSs, you should consult your own tax advisors concerning the U.S.
federal income tax consequences to you in light of your particular situation as well as any consequences arising under other U.S.
federal tax laws and the laws of any other tax jurisdiction.
ADSs
If you hold ADSs,
for U.S. federal income tax purposes, you generally will be treated as the owner of the underlying common shares that are represented
by such ADSs. Accordingly, deposits or withdrawals of our common shares for ADSs will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax.
Taxation of Distributions
Subject to the discussion
under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company” below, distributions on our common shares or ADSs (including amounts
withheld to reflect Brazilian withholding taxes and distributions of interest on shareholders’ equity, as described above
under “—Brazilian Tax Considerations”) will be taxable as dividends to the extent paid out of our current or
accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. Such dividends (including withheld taxes)
will be includable in your gross income as ordinary income on the day actually or constructively received by you, in the case of
our common shares, or by the depositary, in the case of our ADSs. Such dividends, however, will not be eligible for the dividends
received deduction allowed to corporations.
Under current law,
dividends received by non-corporate U.S. shareholders of qualified foreign corporations will be subject to U.S. federal income
tax at lower rates than other types of ordinary income if certain conditions are met. A foreign corporation generally is treated
as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to dividends received from that corporation on shares (or ADSs backed by such shares)
that are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. U.S. Treasury Department guidance indicates
that our ADSs (which are listed on the NYSE), but not our common shares, are readily tradable on an established securities market
in the United States. Thus, we do not believe that dividends that we pay on our common shares that are not represented by ADSs
currently meet the conditions required for these reduced tax rates. There can be no assurance that our ADSs will be considered
readily tradable on an established securities market in later years. Non-corporate holders that do not meet a minimum holding period
requirement during which they are not protected from the risk of loss or that elect to treat the dividend income as “investment
income” pursuant to Section 163(d)(4) of the Code will not be eligible for the reduced rates of taxation regardless of our
status as a qualified foreign corporation. In addition, the rate reduction will not apply to dividends if the recipient of a dividend
is obligated to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property. This disallowance
applies even if the minimum holding period has been met. You should consult your tax advisors regarding the application of this
legislation to your particular circumstances.
Notwithstanding the
foregoing, non-corporate U.S. Holders will not be eligible for reduced rates of taxation on any dividends received from us if we
are a passive foreign investment company (a “PFIC”) in the taxable year in which such dividends are paid or in the
preceding taxable year (as discussed under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company” below).
The amount of any dividend
paid in reais will equal the U.S. dollar value of the reais received, calculated by reference to the exchange rate
in effect at the date the dividend is actually or constructively received by you, in the case of our common shares, or by the depositary,
in the case of our ADSs, regardless of whether the reais are converted into U.S. dollars at that time. If the reais
received as a dividend are not converted into U.S. dollars at the date of receipt, you will have a tax basis in reais equal
to their U.S. dollar value at the date of receipt. Any gain or loss realized on a subsequent conversion or other disposition of
reais will be treated as U.S. source ordinary income or loss.
Subject to certain
conditions and limitations, Brazilian withholding taxes on dividends may be treated as foreign taxes eligible for credit against
your U.S. federal income tax liability. For purposes of calculating the foreign tax credit, dividends paid on our common shares
or ADSs will be treated as income from sources outside the United States and will generally constitute passive category income.
Further, in certain circumstances, if you have held our common shares or ADSs for less than a specified minimum period during which
you are not protected from risk of loss, or are obligated to make payments related to the dividends, you will not be allowed a
foreign tax credit for foreign taxes imposed on dividends paid on our common shares or ADSs. If you do not elect to claim a U.S.
foreign tax credit, you may instead claim a deduction for Brazilian income tax withheld, but only for a taxable year in which you
elect to do so with respect to all foreign income taxes paid or accrued in such taxable year. The rules governing the foreign tax
credit are complex. You are urged to consult your tax advisors regarding the availability of the foreign tax credit under your
particular circumstances.
To the extent that
the amount of any distribution (including amounts withheld to reflect Brazilian withholding taxes and distributions of interest
on shareholders’ equity, as described above under “—Brazilian Tax Considerations”) exceeds our current
and accumulated earnings and profits for a taxable year, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles, the distribution
will first be treated as a tax-free return of capital, causing a reduction in the adjusted basis of our common shares or ADSs,
and the balance in excess of adjusted basis will be taxed as capital gain recognized on a sale or exchange (as discussed below
under “—Taxation of Capital Gains”). However, we do not expect to keep earnings and profits in accordance with
U.S. federal income tax principles. Therefore, you should expect that a distribution will generally be treated as a dividend (as
discussed above).
Distributions of common
shares or ADSs that are received as part of a pro rata distribution to all of our shareholders generally will not be subject to
U.S. federal income tax.
Passive Foreign Investment Company
In general, we will be a PFIC
for any taxable year in which:
|
●
|
at least 75% of our gross income is passive income, or
|
|
●
|
at least 50% of the value (determined based on a quarterly average) of our assets is attributable to assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income.
|
For purposes of determining
whether we are a PFIC, cash is a passive asset and passive income generally includes dividends, interest, royalties and rents (other
than royalties and rents derived in the active conduct of a trade or business and not derived from a related person). In addition,
income from commodities transactions is generally considered passive unless such income is derived in the active conduct of a commodities
business. If we own at least 25% (by value) of the stock of another corporation, we will be treated, for purposes of the PFIC tests,
as owning our proportionate share of the other corporation’s assets and receiving our proportionate share of the other corporation’s
income.
Based on the composition
of our income and assets, including goodwill, we do not believe that we were classified as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes
for our most recent taxable year. The rules in this regard are not entirely clear, however, and there can be no assurance that
the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) will not successfully assert a contrary position. In addition, the determination
of whether we are a PFIC is made annually. Accordingly, it is possible that our status as a PFIC may change in any future taxable
year due to changes in our asset or income composition. Although the determination of whether we are a PFIC is made annually, if
we are a PFIC for any taxable year in which you hold our common shares or ADSs, you will be subject to special tax rules discussed
below for that year and for each subsequent year in which you hold the common shares or ADSs (even if we do not qualify as a PFIC
in such subsequent years). However, if we cease to be a PFIC, you can avoid the continuing impact of the PFIC rules by making a
special election (a “Purging Election”) to recognize gain in the manner described below as if your common shares or
ADSs had been sold on the last day of the last taxable year during which we were a PFIC. In addition, a new holding period would
be deemed to begin for your common shares or ADSs for purposes of the PFIC rules. After the Purging Election, your common shares
or ADSs with respect to which the Purging Election was made will not be treated as shares in a PFIC unless we subsequently become
a PFIC. You are urged to consult your own tax advisor about the availability of this election, and whether making the election
would be advisable in your particular circumstances.
If we are a PFIC for
any taxable year during which you hold our common shares or ADSs, and you do not make a mark-to-market election, as described below,
you will be subject to special tax rules with respect to any “excess distribution” received and any gain realized from
a sale or other disposition, including a pledge, of common shares or ADSs. Distributions received in a taxable year that are greater
than 125% of the average annual distributions received during the shorter of the three preceding taxable years or your holding
period for the common shares or ADSs will be treated as excess distributions. Under these special tax rules:
|
●
|
the excess distribution or gain will be allocated ratably over your holding period for the common shares or ADSs,
|
|
●
|
the amount allocated to the current taxable year, and any taxable year prior to the first taxable year in which we were a PFIC, will be treated as ordinary income, and
|
|
●
|
the amount allocated to each other year will be subject to tax at the highest tax rate in effect for that year and the interest charge generally applicable to underpayments of tax will be imposed on the resulting tax attributable to each such year.
|
You will also generally
be required to file IRS Form 8621 if you hold our common shares or ADSs in any year in which we are classified as a PFIC.
If we are a PFIC for
any taxable year during which you hold our common shares or ADSs and any of our non-U.S. subsidiaries is also a PFIC, you will
be treated as owning a proportionate amount (by value) of the shares of the lower-tier PFIC for purposes of the application of
these rules. You are urged to consult your tax advisors about the application of the PFIC rules to any of our subsidiaries.
In certain circumstances,
in lieu of being subject to the rules discussed above with respect to excess distributions and recognized gains, you may make an
election to include gain on the stock of a PFIC as ordinary income under a mark-to-market method, provided that such stock is regularly
traded on a qualified exchange. Under current law, the mark-to-market election may be available to holders of ADSs because the
ADSs are listed on the NYSE, which constitutes a qualified exchange, although there can be no assurance that the ADSs will be “regularly
traded” for purposes of the mark-to-market election. It should also be noted that only our ADSs and not our common shares
are listed on a qualified stock exchange in the United States. Our common shares are listed on the B3, which must meet certain
trading, listing, financial disclosure and other requirements to be treated as a qualified exchange under applicable U.S. Treasury
regulations for purposes of the mark-to-market election, and no assurance can be given that our common shares will be “regularly
traded” for purposes of the mark-to-market election.
If you make an effective
mark-to-market election, you will include in each year that we are a PFIC as ordinary income the excess of the fair market value
of your common shares or ADSs at the end of the year over your adjusted tax basis in the common shares or ADSs. You will be entitled
to deduct as an ordinary loss in each such year the excess of your adjusted tax basis in the common shares or ADSs over their fair
market value at the end of the year, but only to the extent of the net amount previously included in income as a result of the
mark-to-market election. If you make an effective mark-to-market election, in each year that we are a PFIC any gain you recognize
upon the sale or other disposition of your common shares or ADSs will be treated as ordinary income and any loss will be treated
as ordinary loss, but only to the extent of the net amount of previously included income as a result of the mark-to-market election.
Your adjusted tax basis
in the common shares or ADSs will be increased by the amount of any income inclusion and decreased by the amount of any deductions
under the mark-to-market rules. If you make a mark-to-market election, it will be effective for the taxable year for which the
election is made and all subsequent taxable years unless the common shares or ADSs are no longer regularly traded on a qualified
exchange or the IRS consents to the revocation of the election. You are urged to consult your tax advisor about the availability
of the mark-to-market election, and whether making the election would be advisable in your particular circumstances.
Alternatively, you
can sometimes avoid the rules described above by electing to treat a PFIC as a “qualified electing fund” under Section
1295 of the Code. However, this option is not available to you because we do not intend to comply with the requirements necessary
to permit you to make this election.
You are urged to consult
your tax advisors concerning the U.S. federal income tax consequences of holding common shares or ADSs if we are considered a PFIC
in any taxable year.
Taxation of Capital Gains
You generally will
recognize taxable gain or loss upon the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of our common shares or ADSs equal to the difference
between the amount realized on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of such common shares or ADSs and your adjusted
tax basis in such common shares or ADSs. Subject to the discussion under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company”
above, such gain or loss will generally be capital gain or loss. Capital gains or losses will be long-term capital gain or loss
if our common shares or ADSs have been held for more than one year. Certain non-corporate U.S. Holders (including individuals)
may be eligible for preferential rates of U.S. federal income tax in respect of long-term capital gains. The deductibility of capital
losses is subject to limitations under the Code.
If a Brazilian income
tax is withheld on the sale or other disposition of our common shares or ADSs, your amount realized will include the gross amount
of the proceeds of that sale or other disposition before deduction of the Brazilian income tax. Capital gain or loss, if any, realized
by you on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of our common shares or ADSs generally will be treated as U.S. source
gain or loss for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. Consequently, in the case of gain from the disposition of common shares or ADSs
that is subject to Brazilian income tax, you may not be able to benefit from the foreign tax credit for that Brazilian income tax
(i.e., because the gain from the disposition would be U.S. source), unless you can apply the credit (subject to applicable limitations)
against U.S. federal income tax payable on other income from foreign sources. Alternatively, you may take a deduction for the Brazilian
income tax if you do not take a credit for any foreign taxes paid or accrued during the taxable year.
Other Brazilian Taxes
You should note that
any Brazilian IOF/Exchange Tax or IOF/Securities Tax (as discussed above under “—Brazilian Tax Considerations”)
generally will not be treated as a creditable foreign tax for U.S. federal income tax purposes, although you may be entitled to
deduct such taxes, subject to applicable limitations under the Code. You should consult your tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal
income tax consequences of these taxes.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
In general, information
reporting will apply to dividends (including distributions of interest on shareholders’ equity) in respect of our common
shares or ADSs and the proceeds from the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of our common shares or ADSs that are paid
to you within the United States (and in certain cases, outside the United States), unless you establish that you are an exempt
recipient, such as a corporation. A backup withholding tax may apply to such payments if you fail to provide your correct taxpayer
identification number or certification of exempt status or fail to report in full dividend and interest income.
Backup withholding
is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowed as a refund or a credit against
your U.S. federal income tax liability provided the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.
The above description is not intended
to constitute a complete analysis of all tax consequences relating to the acquisition, ownership or disposition of our common shares
or ADSs. Each holder should consult such holder’s own tax advisor concerning the overall tax consequences to it, including
the consequences under laws other than U.S. federal income tax laws, of an investment in our common shares or ADSs.
|
F.
|
Dividends and Paying Agents
|
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
We are subject to the
reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, which requires that we file periodic reports and other information with the SEC. As
a foreign private issuer, we file annual reports on Form 20-F as opposed to Form 10-K. We do not file quarterly reports on Form
10-Q but furnish reports on Form 6-K.
Our reports and other
information filed by us with the SEC are available on the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov and may also be inspected and copied
by the public at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at Station Place, 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington,
D.C.
20549.
From time to time,
we may use our website as a channel of distribution of material company information. Financial and other material information regarding
our company is routinely posted on and accessible at www.brasil-agro.com. Information on our website is not incorporated by reference
in this annual report.
We furnish The Bank
of New York, as the depositary of our ADSs, with annual reports in English, which include a review of operations and our audited
consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS, and our annual report on Form 20-F. Upon our request, the depositary
will promptly mail such reports to all record holders of ADSs. We also furnish to the depositary, in English, all notices of shareholders’
meetings and other reports and communications that are made generally available to our shareholders. Upon our request, the depositary
will make such notices, reports and communications available to holders of ADSs and will mail to all record holders of ADSs a notice
containing a summary of the information contained in any notice of a shareholders’ meeting it receives.
As a foreign private
issuer, we are exempt from the Exchange Act rules prescribing the furnishing and content of proxy statements. As a foreign private
issuer, we are also exempt from the Exchange Act rules relating to short-swing profit disclosure and liability.
|
I.
|
Subsidiary Information
|
Not applicable.
ITEM 11—QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to market
risks arising in the normal course of our business. Market risks are beyond our control and consist of the possibility that changes
in interest rates, exchange rates, the market prices of our products and credit risks may adversely affect the value of our financial
assets and liabilities or our future cash flows or earnings.
Raw Material Acquisition
Risks
For the acquisition
of farming inputs, our primary risks are foreign-exchange variations, the supply and demand of each input, farming commodity prices
and freight prices. Our dependence on imported raw materials is also subject to supply and customs clearance delays. We are also
subject to risks regarding the availability of the specific varieties of seeds we use, which are affected by weather conditions,
among other factors.
In addition, the price
of diesel fuel, which is the primary fuel used in farming machinery and trucks, is affected by the variation in oil prices as well
as by the price-control policies adopted by the Brazilian government.
Foreign Exchange Risks
Certain of our income
is linked to the exchange rate between the real and the U.S. dollar, and consequently our revenues are impacted by foreign
exchange fluctuations. Certain of our commodities, such as soybean, may be priced in reais or in U.S. dollars. In addition,
certain of the inputs necessary for farming production, such as chemicals, pesticides and fertilizers, may be priced in or based
on the U.S. dollar. In order to reduce the impact on revenue, we seek to limit our foreign exchange exposure to 5% of our total
expected revenue from commodities typically priced in U.S. dollars.
On June 30, 2020, we had a short position
in U.S. dollars in the amount of US$38.0 million. The result of a hypothetical devaluation of 5% of the real in relation
to the dollar would generate a loss before taxes of R$10.4 million.
Interest Rate Risks
Exposure to interest
rates subjects us and our subsidiaries to risks arising from the effect of interest rate fluctuations on our financial assets and
liabilities. A portion of our indebtedness is subject to fixed rates of interest, while only our financings with BNDES are subject
to variable rates indexed to the TJLP rate. We do not engage in hedging transactions with respect to such financings because we
believe the interest rates charged thereon are lower than typical rates in the Brazilian market.
If our volume of funds
invested in financial instruments indexed to the CDI rate remains the same with June 30, 2020 as a base date, a hypothetical decrease
in the CDI rate of 10% would reduce our income by R$35.9 thousand monthly.
Farming Commodity Risks
A reduction in commodity
prices would affect our margins and operating results. Commodity price variations are associated with global supply and demand,
as well as climatic, technological, commercial and economic conditions and government policies. To reduce these risks to us from
commodity price variations, we use financial instruments such as derivatives and over-the-counter instruments including options
and futures contracts negotiated in the commodities market throughout the ordinary course of our crop cycles, from the purchase
of inputs to crop planting up until harvest. We believe that the maintenance of our current hedging policy is necessary to minimize
the risks related to commodity price variations.
On June 30, 2020, we
had a short position in soybean derivatives (CBOT-futures, options and OTC contracts) in the total volume of 745,558 thousand bags.
Considering sales volumes
hedged by derivatives and the soybean price as of June 30, 2020, we believe that a hypothetical decrease of 5% in the price of
soybean not hedged by derivatives would decrease our expected revenues from grain sales for the next 12 months by R$7.5 million.
Risk Management and Hedging Policies
We are exposed to risks
derived from commodity price variations for such products as soybean, corn, sugarcane, rice and sorghum, as well as foreign-exchange
variations. We hedge our exposure to commodity price risks for our transactions through over-the-counter instruments and maintain
our exposures within pre-established limits. Such financial instruments include (i) commodity price and exchange rate swap contracts;
(ii) currency contracts that provide a fixed exchange rate in reais for our dollar-denominated receivables and chargeables;
(iii) commodity futures contracts for soybean, corn and ethanol that allow us to buy or sell commodities at predetermined prices;
and (v) options contracts that allow us to acquire the right to buy or sell an asset at a preset price by a certain date. Since
these transactions are normally made in U.S. dollars, we hedge our exposure to foreign-exchange risks by entering into contracts
with fixed exchange rates. We have set our limit of foreign-exchange exposure to 5% of the total revenue expected from the sale
of each commodity produced by us.
Our risk management
policy seeks to protect our cash flows and expenditures, and thus we monitor the volatility and historical patterns of the primary
market trends that affect our revenue and production costs, including (i) commodity prices, commonly determined in U.S. dollars;
(ii) differences between domestic and international market prices of our commodities; (iii) exchange rates; and (iv) prices impacting
our principal production costs, including, fertilizers, pesticides and chemicals.
In addition to monitoring
these trends, our strategic planning department analyzes them in light of our exposures and positions in the market and prepares
reports on a regular basis analyzing such risks in the light of simulations under various hypothetical situations indicating the
effects on our results of different variations in market prices and conditions. Such analysis and reports include the monitoring
and assessment of: (i) the status of the commercialization and delivery of our products; (ii) updates regarding our estimated planted
area and production volumes; (iii) the distribution of sales by product and type (such as futures contracts, options, fixed term
contracts); (iv) market analysis and historical comparisons of the prices, rates and other indices that affect our gross revenue;
(v) risk analysis models and simulations such as the Monte Carlo simulation, that analyze the volatility and sensitivity of our
assets and the correlations that exist among such assets; and (vi) stress test analyses under different scenarios. Such reports
are then delivered to our risk management committee, which develops the goals and limits of our hedging strategy and our hedging
policy, which is defined and approved by our board of directors. Our risk management committee then supervises our strategic planning
department in the implementation and the execution of our hedging strategy.
ITEM 12— DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES
OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
|
D.
|
American Depositary Shares
|
The following table
sets forth the fees and expenses that a holder of ADRs may have to pay pursuant to our Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement,
dated as of November 6, 2012 (the “Deposit Agreement”), with The Bank of New York Mellon, as depositary, in connection
with our ADS program:
Fee and Reimbursement Provisions
Fee or Charge
|
|
Relating to
|
|
|
|
1. Taxes and other governmental charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Registration fees as may be in effect for the registration of transfers of common shares underlying the ADRs on the share register of our company or any Brazilian registrar
|
|
The transfer of common shares underlying ADRs to or from the name of the depositary or its nominee or Banco Itaú, S.A., as custodian for the depositary, or its nominee on the making of deposits or withdrawals under the Deposit Agreement
|
|
|
|
3. Cable, telex and facsimile transmission expenses expressly provided under the Deposit Agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Expenses incurred by the depositary in the conversion of foreign currency
|
|
Amounts in reais received by way of dividends or other distributions or the net proceeds from the sale of securities, property or other rights in respect of ADRs
|
|
|
|
5. U.S.$5.00 or less per 100 ADRs (or portion thereof)
|
|
The delivery of ADRs and the surrender of ADRs, or the distribution of securities or other property to holders of ADRs
|
|
|
|
6. U.S.$0.02 or less per ADR (or portion thereof)
|
|
Any cash distribution made pursuant to the Deposit Agreement, except for distributions of cash dividends
|
|
|
|
7. U.S.$0.02 or less per ADR (or portion thereof) per year, subject to prior consent by the Company
|
|
Depositary services
|
|
|
|
8. Payment of any other charges payable by the depositary, any of the depositary’s agents, including the depositary’s custodian, or the agents of the depositary’s agents in connection with the servicing of shares underlying the American Depositary Shares or other deposited securities
|
|
|
The fee and reimbursement
provisions described in rows seven and eight of the table above may, at the depositary’s discretion, be billed to the holders
of ADSs or deducted from one or more cash dividends or other cash distributions.
A form of the Deposit
Agreement is filed as Exhibit 2.1 to this annual report. We encourage you to review this document carefully if you are a holder
of ADSs.
Payment of Taxes
ADS holders are responsible
for any taxes or other governmental charges payable on our ADSs or on the deposited securities represented by any of our ADSs.
The depositary may refuse to register any transfer of our ADSs or allow the withdrawal of the deposited securities represented
by our ADSs until such taxes or other charges are paid. It may apply payments owed to ADS holders or sell deposited securities
represented by ADSs to pay any taxes owed and ADS holders will remain liable for any deficiency. If the depositary sells deposited
securities, it will, if appropriate, reduce the number of ADSs to reflect the sale and pay to ADS holders any proceeds, or send
to ADS holders any property, remaining after it has paid the taxes.
BrasilAgro estimated the fair
value of the identifiable assets and of the liabilities acquired of Agrifirma and of the consideration transferred as of January
27, 2020. For the purposes of estimating the consideration transferred, BrasilAgro considered the number of common shares adjusted
by the amount of indemnifications.
On April 20, 2020, the Company
acquired a total area of 4,489 hectares (2,904 agricultural hectares) of the Serra Grande Farm, a rural property located in the
city of Baixa Grande do Ribeiro, state of Piauí, in the amount of R$25,047, corresponding to 282,884 soybean bags per agricultural
hectares.
In order for a financial asset to be classified
and measured at amortised cost, it needs to give rise to cash flows that are ’solely payments of principal and interest
(SPPI)’ on the principal amount outstanding.
The Company’s business model for
managing financial assets refers to how it manages its financial assets in order to generate cash flows. The business model determines
whether cash flows will result from collecting contractual cash flows, selling the financial assets, or both.
Purchases or sales of financial assets
that require delivery of assets within a time frame established by regulation or convention in the market place (regular way trades)
are recognised on the trade date, i.e., the date that the Company commits to purchase or sell the asset.
For the purposes of subsequent
measurement, the Company’s financial assets are classified as:
i. Financial assets at fair
value through profit or loss
Financial assets at fair value through
profit or loss are carried in the statement of financial position at fair value with net changes in fair value recognised in the
statement of income.
The Company designates certain
financial assets at the initial recognition by the fair value through profit or loss. This designation cannot be altered later.
This category includes marketable securities, derivative financial instruments and receivables from the sale of farms, which consist
of debt instruments recognized in the consolidated balance sheet in “Trade accounts receivable”.
Changes in fair value related
to credits for the sale of farms designated as fair value through profit or loss are recognized in “Net on remeasurement of
receivables from sale of farms” under “Financial income”(Note 25).
ii. Financial assets at amortized
cost (debt instrument).
The Company measures financial
assets at amortized cost when both of the following conditions are met:
Financial assets at amortised
cost are subsequently measured using the effective interest ratemethod (EIR) and are subject to impairment. Gains and losses are
recognised in statement of income when the asset is derecognised, modified or impaired.
The Company’s financial
assets at amortised cost includes trade receivables, and loan to an associate and loan to a director included under other non-current
financial assets.
The Company recognises an allowance
for expected credit losses (ECLs) for all debt instruments not held at fair value through profit or loss. ECLs are based on the
difference between the contractual cash flows due in accordance with the contract and all the cash flows that the Company expects
to receive, discounted at an approximation of the original effective interest rate. The expected cash flows will include cash flows
from the sale of collateral held or other credit enhancements that are integral to the contractual terms.
The Company considers a financial
asset to be in default when contractual payments are overdue more than 90 days. However, in certain cases, the Company may also
consider that a financial asset is in default when internal or external information indicate that is unlikely that the Company
will receive the full outstanding contractual amounts before taking into account any improvements of the credit held by the Company.
A financial asset is derecognized when the Company considers there is no reasonable expectation of recovering the contractual cash
flows.
The following criteria is used
by the Company uses to determine if there is objective evidence of expected credit losses:
Financial liabilities are classified,
at initial recognition, as financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss or financial liabilities at amortized cost,
as appropriate.
The Company’s financial
liabilities include trade and other payables, loans and borrowings including bank overdrafts, and derivative financial instruments.
The measurement of financial
liabilities depends on their classification, as described below:
i. Financial liabilities at
fair value through profit or loss
Financial liabilities at fair
value through profit or loss include financial liabilities held for trading and financial liabilities designated upon initial recognition
as at fair value through profit or loss.
Financial liabilities are classified
as held for trade when they are incurred for repurchase in the short term. This category also includes derivate financial instruments
contracted by the Company that are not designated as hedge instruments under the hedge relations established under IFRS 9.
Gains and losses with held-for-trading
liabilities are recognized in the statement of income.
Financial liabilities designated
upon initial recognition at fair value through profit or loss are designated at the initial date of recognition, and only if the
criteria in IFRS 9 are satisfied.
ii. Financial liabilities at
amortized cost
After initial recognition, interest-bearing
loans and borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate (EIR) method. Gains and losses
are recognised in statement of income when the liabilities are derecognised as well as through the EIR amortisation process.
Amortised cost is calculated
by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and fees or costs that are an integral part of the EIR. The EIR amortisation
is included as finance costs in the statement of income.
The Company uses derivative
financial instruments, such as future exchange contracts, interest rate swaps and forward commodity contracts, to protect against
risks related to exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices, respectively. Derivative financial
instruments are initially recognized at fair value on the date a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently re-measured
at their fair value. The derivatives are recorded as financial assets when their fair value is positive and as financial
liabilities when their fair value is negative.
Although the Company uses derivative
financial instruments for economic hedge purposes, it has not applied hedge accounting.
Any gains or losses arising
from changes in the fair value of derivatives during the year are recognized immediately in the statement of income (Note 25).
The fair value of derivative financial instruments is disclosed in Note 6.
Trade receivables are amounts
due from customers for merchandise and farms sold in the ordinary course of business. If collection is expected in one year or
less, trade receivables are classified as current assets, otherwise, they are presented as non-current assets.
Trade
receivables not related to the sale of farms are initially recognized at fair value, and subsequently, measured at amortized cost
under the effective interest rate method, less for expected credit losses, as appropriate.
Trade receivables related to
the sale of farms for which the amount of cash receivable is contractually determined in Reais, equivalent to a quantity of soybean
bags at the sale date, are designated at fair value through profit or loss upon initial recognition. The amount of the receivable
is subsequently remeasured at each balance sheet date by applying to the contractual committeed quantity of soybean bags by the
quotation of soybean for future delivery at the maturity date of each installment (or based on estimates and quotations of
brokers when there is no quotation of soybean for future delivery on a specific maturity date) and by translating the resulting
U.S. dollars amount to Reais using the U.S. dollar exchange rate for future delivery on the same maturity date (considering that
future soybean quotations are denominated in U.S.dollar) and finally discounting the resulting amount to present value. The gain
(loss) on remeasurement of the receivable is recognized in financial income and expenses under “Gain (loss) on remeasurement
of receivables from sale of farms” (Note 25).
Agricultural products are measured
at fair value less selling expenses. They are reclassified from biological assets to inventories at the time they are harvested.
Seeds, manures, fertilizers,
pesticides, fuel, lubricants, warehouse and sundry materials are measured at average acquisition cost.
Upon identification of the loss
of quality of products which affect their sales (either due to storage, load, transportation and other events related to the operation),
these products are counted and physically segregated.
An adjustment to net realizable
value of agricultural products is recognized when the fair value recorded in inventories is higher than the net realizable
value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less estimated costs to sell. Adjustments
to net realizable value are recognized in the statement of income in “Adjustment to net realizable value of agricultural
products after harvest”.
The Company’s biological
assets consist mainly of the cultivation of soybean, corn, cotton, sugarcane and beef cattle, which are measured at fair value
less costs to sell.
The fair value of biological
assets is determined upon their initial recognition and at each subsequent balance sheet date. Gains and losses arising from the
changes in fair value of biological assets is determined as the difference between fair value and the costs incurred in the plantation
and treatment of crops of biological assets and agricultural products at the balance sheet date, and are recorded in the statement
of income in “Changes in fair value of biological assets”. In certain circumstances, the estimated fair value less
cost to sell approximate cost incurred at that moment, especially when only a minor biological transformation has taken place or
when no material impact is expected from that biological transformation on the price. Biological assets continue to be recorded
at their fair value.
The sugarcane crops productive
cycle is five years on average, and for a new cycle to start depends on the completion of the previous cycle. In this regard, the
current cycle is classified as biological asset in current assets, and the amount of the constitution of the bearer plant (bearer
of the other cycles) are classified as permanent culture in property, plant and equipment . The calculation methodology used to
estimate the fair value of the biological asset “sugarcane” was the discounted cash flows at a rate reflecting the
risks and the terms of the operation. As such, the Company projected the future cash flows in accordance with the projected productivity
cycle, taking into consideration the estimated useful life of each area, the prices of Total Sugar Recoverable (“ATR”),
estimated productivity and the related estimated costs of production, including the cost of land, harvest, loading and transportation
for each hectare planted.
As mentioned above, the fair
value of the biological assets disclosed in the balance sheet was determined using valuation techniques – the discounted
cash flows method. The data used in these methods is based on the information observed in the market, whenever possible, and if
unavailable, a certain level of judgment is required to establish such fair value. Judgment is used to determine the data to be
used, e.g. price, productivity and production cost. Changes in the assumptions on these inputs might affect the fair value of biological
assets.
In 2016, the Company started
raising cattle. In Brazil, the main activity consists of producing and raising cattle, which characterizes the activity as bearer.
In Paraguay, the main activity is raising and selling cattle, which characterizes the activity as consumable.
For segregation purposes, when
applicable, the Company classifies its cattle herd into: consumable cattle (current assets), which can be sold as a biological
asset for meat production; and bearer cattle (non-current assets), which is used in farm operations to generate other biological
assets. At June 30, 2020, the Company only had bearer and consumable cattle, which includes calves, heifers, pregnant heifers,
pregnant cows, calves, steers and bulls.
The fair value of beef cattle
is determined based on market prices, given the existence of an active market. Gain or loss from changes in the fair value of beef
cattle is recognized in statement of income for the period (Note 9). The Company considered the prices in the cattle market in
Bahia state and in Boqueron (Paraguay), considered the principal market, and the metrics used in the market.
Accordingly, consumable cattle
and bearer cattle are measured based on observable market prices, weight, and age of the animals.
The Company’s business strategy
aims mainly at the acquisition, development, exploration and sale of rural properties where agricultural activities can be developed.
The Company acquires rural properties believed to have significant potential of appreciation in value by means of maintenance of
assets and development of profitable agricultural activities. By acquiring rural properties, the Company seeks to implement higher
value added crops and transform these rural properties with investments in infrastructure and technology, in addition to entering
into lease contracts with third parties. Based on this strategy, whenever the Company considers that its rural properties are
profitable, it sells these rural properties to realize capital gains.
The land of rural properties
purchased by the Company is measured at acquisition cost, which does not exceed its net realizable value, and is presented in “Non-current
assets”. The fair value of each property is disclosed in Note 10.
Buildings, improvements and
opening of areas in investment properties are measured at historical cost, less accumulated depreciation, following the same
criteria described for property, plant and equipment in Note 2.11.
Property, plant and equipment
is measured at historical cost less accumulated depreciation. Historical cost includes expenditures directly attributable to the
acquisition of the items. Historical cost also includes borrowing costs related to the acquisition of qualifying assets.
Subsequent costs are included
in the asset’s carrying amount or recognized as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic
benefits associated with the item will flow to the Company and the cost of the item can be reliably measured. All other repair
and maintenance costs are recognized in statement of income, as incurred.
Depreciation is calculated using
the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, at the depreciation rates described below:
The residual amount and useful
lives of property, plant and equipment are revised and adjusted, if appropriate, at the end of each year.
An asset carrying amount is
written down immediately to its recoverable amount if the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its estimated recoverable amount.
Gains and losses on disposals
are determined by comparing the sale price with the carrying amount and are recognized in “Other operating income (expenses),
net” in the statement of income.
Intangible assets includes software
license and acquired contractual rights and are amortized over their estimated useful life of 5 years. Costs associated with software
maintenance are recognized as an expense as incurred.
Pursuant to IAS 36 – Impairment
of Assets, assets with finite useful lives are reviewed for impairment indicators on each balance sheet date and whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the book value may not be recoverable. If any indication exists, the assets are tested
for impairment. An impairment loss is recognized for the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and its recoverable
amount.
On June 30, 2020 and 2019, no
indication of impairment of assets was identified.
Trade account payables are obligations
to pay for goods or services acquired from suppliers in the ordinary course of business. Trade accounts payables are classified
as current liabilities if payment is due within one year or less, otherwise they are classified as non-current liabilities.
Loans, financing and debentures
are recognized initially at fair value, net of transaction costs incurred, and subsequently carried at amortized cost. Any difference
between the procceds (net of transaction costs) and the settlement value is recognized in the statement of income over the agreement
period using the effective interest rate method.
Fees paid in raising credit
facilities are recognized as transaction costs to the extent that it is probable that some or all of the facility will be used.
In this case, the fee is deferred until the facility is completely in use. To the extent there is no evidence that it is probable
that some or all of the facility will be used, the fee is capitalized as a prepayment for liquididation services and amortized
over the period of the facility to which it relates.
Loans, financing and debentures
are classified as current liabilities unless the Company has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at
least 12 months or longer after the balance sheet date.
Provisions are recognized when
the Company has a present, legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events and it is probable that an outflow of resources
will be required to settle the obligation, and the amount can be reliably estimated.
Contingent liabilities arising
from labor, tax, civil and administrative claims are recorded at their estimated amount when the likelihood of loss in considered
probable (Note 3.a).
Current income tax assets and
liabilities are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax
laws used to compute the amount are those that are enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date in the countries where
the Group operates and generates taxable income. As allowed by the Brazilian tax legislation, certain subsidiaries opted for a
tax regime under which taxable profit is computed as a percentage of revenues. Under this regime, taxable profit for income and
social contribution tax is calculated by applying a rate of 8% and 12% on gross revenue, respectively, on which the statutory rates
for income and social contribution tax are applied.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the year when the asset is realized or the liability is settled, based
on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date. Such rates are 25% for income
tax and 9% for social contribution tax (Note 17).
The Company operates a number
of equity-settled, share-based compensation plans, under which the entity receives services from employees as consideration for
equity instruments (options and shares) of the Company.
The cost of transactions settled
with shares is recognized as expense for the year, jointly with a corresponding increase in equity during the year in which the
conditions of performance and/or provision of services are met. The accumulated expenses recognized in connection with the equity
instruments on each base date, until the date of acquisition, reflect the extent to which the acquisition period has expired and
the best estimate of the Company as to the number of equity instruments to be acquired.
The expense or reversal of expenses
for each year represents the changes in accumulated expenses recognized in the beginning and end of the year. Expenses related
to services that did not complete their acquisition period are not recognized, except for transactions settled with shares in which
the acquisition depends on a market condition or on the non-acquisition of rights, which are treated as acquired, irrespective
of whether the market condition or the condition of non-acquisition of rights is fulfilled or not, provided that all other conditions
of performance and/or provision of services are met.
When an equity instrument is
modified, the minimum expense recognized is the expense that would have been incurred if the terms had not been modified. An additional
expense is recognized in case the modification raises the total fair value of the consideration paid for such shares or that otherwise
benefits, as measured on the date of modification.
If an equity instrument is canceled,
such instrument is treated as if it was fully acquired on the date of cancellation, and any expenses not yet recognized, relating
to the premium, are recognized immediately in the statement of income of the year.
This includes any premium whose
non-acquisition conditions under the control of the Company or the employee are not met. However, if the canceled plan is replaced
by a new plan and substitute grants are generated, on the date it is granted, the canceled grant and the new plan will be treated
as a modification of the original grant, as described in the previous paragraph. All cancellations of transactions with share-based
payments will be treated the same.
The Company provides employees
a profit-sharing program, under which all of the employees have the right to receive annual bonuses based on the Company’s
consolidated financial and operational results, and also on personal goals set for individual employees. Profit sharing is recognized
at year end, when the amount can be reliably measured by the Company.
Common shares are recorded in
equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to issue new shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction of the issued
amount, net of taxes.
Revenue comprises the fair value
of the consideration received or receivable for the sale of goods in the ordinary course of the Company’s activities. Revenue is
presented net of taxes, returns and discounts.
The Company recognizes revenue
when the amount of revenue can be reliably measured, it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the entity and when
specific criteria have been met for each of the Company’s activities, as described below. The Company’s estimates are based
on past experience, taking into consideration the type of customer, the type of transaction and transaction specifics.
The Company applies the model
of IFRS 15 to measure and account for revenue from contracts with clients, which establishes the recognition of revenue in an amount
that reflects the Company’s expected consideration in exchange for the transfer of good or services to a client. The model
is based on five steps: i) identification of the contracts with customers; ii) identification of the performance obligations within
the agreements; iii) determination of the transaction price; iv) allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations
within the agreements; and v) recognition of revenue when the performance obligation is fulfilled.
Revenue from sales of grains
and sugarcane sales is recognized when performance obligations are met, which consists of transforming the significant risks and
benefits of ownership of the goods are transferred to the purchaser, usually when the products are delivered to the purchaser at
the determined location, according to the agreed sales terms.
In the case of grains, the Company
normally enters into forward contracts under which the Company is entitled to determine the sale price for the total or partial
volume of grains sold, through the delivery date, based on formulas contractually agreed upon. In some cases, the formulas
used to determine the sales price are estated in U.S. Dollars. The Reais amount is also contractually determined, which is based
on the exchange rate applicable a couple of days prior to settling the transaction. The price can also be adjusted by other factors,
such as humidity and other technical characteristics of grains.
With regard to the sale of sugarcane,
the Company normally enters into sale agreements for future deliveries, in which data such as volume and minimum ATR are pre-fixed.
The pricing of sugarcane considers the quantity of ATR per ton of sugarcane delivered, and the ATR index price, which is disclosed
every month by Sugarcane Producers Council (Consecana).
Upon the delivery of grains,
revenue is recognized based on the price determined for each client considering the foreign exchange rate on the delivery date
when applicable. After the grains are delivered to the client, the quality and final weight areassessed, and the final price of
the transaction is agreed upon, which result in adjusting the original contractual amounts, and any foreign exchange rate variation
through the settlement date.
Revenue from sale of farms is
not recognized until performance obligations are met, which consists of: (i) the sale be in completed, (ii) the Company
has determined that it is probable the buyer will pay, (iii) the amount of revenue can be measured reliably, and (iv)
the Company has transferred all risks and rewards to the buyer, and does not have a continuing involvement. Usually this coincidies
with the buyer making the first down payment, moment when the transfer of possession is completed, according to the contractual
terms. The result from sales of farms is presented in the statement of income as “Gain on sale of farms” net of the
related cost.
Revenue from the sale of beef
cattle is recognized when performance obligations are met, which consists of transferring the material risks and the benefits of
cattle ownership to the buyer, usually when the cattle is delivered to the buyer at the specified place, in accordance with the
terms of the sale agreed upon.
As for the sale of beef cattle,
the Company’s operation consists basically of a project involving the production and sale of beef calves after weaning (this
process is called rearing). However, some animals that prove to be infertile may be sold to meat packers for slaughtering. At Paraguay
operations, the project consists in fattening and selling these animals for slaughtering. The pricing for sale of cattle is based
on the market price of the arroba of fed cattle in the respective market (the arroba price is verified on the transaction date),
the animal weight, plus the premium related to the category. The sale of cattle in Brazil and Paraguay operations, in turn, considers
the price of the arroba of fed cattle or heifer/cow on the date of sale in the respective market, applied to carcass yields.
Includes interest and foreing
exchange variations arising from loans and financing contracts, marketable securities, trade accounts receivable, gain and losses
on remeasurement of receivables from sale of farms and machinery, gains and losses for changes in fair value of derivative financial
instruments, as well as discounts obtained from suppliers for the prepayment trade accounts payable.
The Company has agreements for
land leases and agricultural partnerships, as well as service agreements. Accordingly, the Company assesses at contract inception
whether a contract is, or contains, a lease. That is, if the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset
for a period of time in exchange for consideration.
The Company applies a
single recognition and measurement approach for all leases, except for short-term leases and leases of low-value assets. The
Company recognises lease liabilities to make lease payments and right-of-use assets representing the right to use the
underlying assets.
The Company recognises
right-of-use assets at the commencement date of the lease (i.e., the date the underlying asset is available for use).
Right-of-use assets are measured at cost, less any accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, and adjusted for any
remeasurement of lease liabilities. The cost of right-of-use assets includes the amount of lease liabilities recognised,
initial direct costs incurred, and lease payments made at or before the commencement date less any lease incentives
received.
Right-of-use assets are depreciated
on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the lease term and the estimated useful lives of the assets.
At the commencement date of
the lease, the Company recognizes lease liabilities measured at the present value of the lease payments to be made over the lease
term. The lease payments include fixed payments (including in-substance fixed payments) less any lease incentives receivable, variable
lease payments that depend on an index or a rate, and amounts expected to be paid under residual value guarantees. The lease payments
also include the exercise price of a purchase option reasonably certain to be exercised by the Company and payments of penalties
for terminating the lease, if the lease term reflects the Company exercising the option to terminate.
Variable lease payments that
do not depend on an index or rate are recognized as expenses (unless they are incurred to produce inventories) in the period in
which the event or condition that triggers the payment occurred.
In calculating the present value
of lease payments, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate at the lease commencement date because the interest rate implicit
in the lease is not readily determinable. After the commencement date, the amount of lease liabilities is increased to reflect
the accretion of interest and reduced for the lease payments made. In addition, the carrying amount of lease liabilities is remeasured
if there is a modification, change in the lease term, change in lease payments (e.g., changes to future payments resulting from
a change in the index or rate used to determine such lease payments) or changes in the assessment of an optio to purchase the asset.
The Company applies the short-term
lease recognition exemption to its short-term leases of machinery and equipment (i.e., those leases that have a lease term of 12
months or less from the commencement date and do not contain a purchase option). It also applies the lease of low-value assets
recognition exemption to leases of office equipment that are considered to be low value. Lease payments on short-term leases and
leases of low-value assets are recognised as expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Leases in which the Company
does not transfer substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of an asset are classified as operating leases.
Rental income arising is accounted for on a straight-line basis over the lease terms and is included in revenue in the income statement
due to its operating nature. Initial direct costs incurred in negotiating and arranging an operating lease are added to the carrying
amount of the leased asset and recognised over the lease term on the same basis as rental income. Contingent rents are recognised
as revenue in the period in which they are earned..
Distribution of dividends to
the Company’s stockholders are recognized as a liability in the Company’s financial statements at year-end based on
the Company’s articles of incorporation. Any amount that exceeds the minimum legally required is only approved at the shareholders’
general meeting according to the proposal submitted by the Board of Directors. The tax benefit of interest on equity is recognized
in the statement of income.
Assets and liabilities arising
from long-term operations and short-term operations for which the financing component could have a material effect, are adjusted
to present value.
Accordingly, certain elements
of assets and liabilities are adjusted to present value, based on discount rates, which aim to reflect the best estimates of time
value of money.
The discount rate used varies
depending on the characteristics of the assets and liabilities including the risk and terms of the specific item, and it is based
on the average rate of loans and financing obtained by the Company, net of inflationary effects.
Basic earnings (loss) per share
is calculated by dividing the available profit by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year.
Diluted earnings per share is
calculated by dividing the available profit by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year plus the
weighted number of additional shares that would be issued if a conversion of all dilutive potential common shares into common shares
existed, such as stock options and warrants.
Interest
paid is classified as cash flows from financing activities since it represents costs for obtaining financial resources, and are
not considered cash flows from operating activities of the Company.
Given the lack of Pronouncement,
Interpretation or Guidance applicable to the specific situation of obligations to deliver fixed amounts of soybean as consideration
for the purchase of investment property under IAS 40, Management exercised its judgment to result in information that is:
BrasilAgro believes that the
cost of acquisition of investment properties subject to IAS 40 includes the obligation to deliver agricultural products on future
dates. This obligation is initially measured at its fair value on the date the property is recognized. The Company adopts criteria
for remeasuring the obligation to deliver agricultural products for the purchase of properties at their fair value on each reporting
date against profit or loss. The gain (loss) from remeasurement of this obligation is recognized in the financial result in the
income statement.
Business combinations are accounted
for using the acquisition method. The cost of an acquisition is measured as the aggregate of the consideration transferred, which
is measured at acquisition date fair value, and the amount of any non-controlling interests in the acquiree. Acquisition-related
costs are expensed as incurred and included in administrative expenses.
When the Company acquires a
business, the Company evaluates the financial assets and liabilities assumed for appropriate classification and allocation in accordance
with the contractual terms, economic circumstances and pertinent conditions as at the acquisition date.
Any contingent consideration
to be transferred by the acquiring company will be recognized at fair value on the acquisition date. Contingent consideration classified
as an asset or liability that is a financial instrument and within the scope of IFRS 9 Financial Instruments, is measured at fair
value with the changes in fair value recognised in the income statement in accordance with IFRS 9.
Goodwill is initially measured
at cost (being the excess of the aggregate of the consideration transferred and the amount recognised for non-controlling interests
and any previous interest held over the net identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed). If the fair value of the net
assets acquired is in excess of the aggregate consideration transferred, the Company re-assesses whether it has correctly identified
all of the assets acquired and all of the liabilities assumed and reviews the procedures used to measure the amounts to be recognised
at the acquisition date. If the reassessment still results in an excess of the fair value of net assets acquired over the aggregate
consideration transferred, then the gain is recognised in profit or loss.
The Company classifies non-current
assets as held for sale if their carrying amounts will be recovered principally through a sale transaction rather than through
continuing use. Non-current assets classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of their carrying amount and fair value
less costs to sell. Costs to sell are the incremental costs directly attributable to the disposal of an asset (disposal group),
excluding finance costs and income tax expense.
The criteria for held for sale
classification is regarded as met only when the sale is highly probable, and the asset or disposal group is available for immediate
sale in its present condition. Actions required to complete the sale should indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes
to the sale will be made or that the decision to sell will be withdrawn. Management must be committed to the plan to sell the asset
and the sale expected to be completed within one year from the date of the classification.
Assets and liabilities classified
as held for sale are presented separately as current items in the statement of financial position.
The Company measures financial
instruments (such as derivatives) and non-financial instruments (such as biological assets) at fair value on each balance sheet
date.
Fair value is the price that
would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. The fair value measurement is based on the presumption that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the
liability takes place either
The fair value of an asset or
a liability is measured using the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, assuming
that market participants act in their economic best interest.
A fair value measurement of
a non-financial asset takes into account a market participant’s ability to generate economic benefits by using the asset in its
highest and best use or by selling it to another market participant that would use the asset in its highest and best use.
The Company uses valuation techniques
that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data are available to measure the fair value, maximizing the
use of relevant observable inputs and minimizing the use of unobservable inputs.
All assets and liabilities
for which fair value is measured or disclosed in the financial statements are categorised within the fair value hierarchy, described
as follows, based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole:
For assets
and liabilities that are recognised in the financial statements at fair value on a recurring basis, the Company determines whether
transfers have occurred between levels in the hierarchy by re-assessing categorisation (based on the lowest level input that is
significant to the fair value measurement as a whole) at the end of each reporting period.
In these financial statements,
the Company applied for the first tim IFRS 16 - Leases and IFRIC 23 - Uncertainty over income tax treatments. The Company has not
early adopted any other standard, interpretation or amendment that has been issued but is not yet effective. The nature and effect
of the changes as a result of adoption of these new accounting standards are described below.
IFRS 16 supersedes IAS 17 Leases, IFRIC 4 Determining whether
an Arrangement contains a Lease, SIC-15 Operating Leases-Incentives and SIC-27 Evaluating the Substance of Transactions Involving
the Legal Form of a Lease. The standard sets out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of
leases and requires lessees to recognize most leases on the balance sheet.
Lessor accounting under IFRS
16 is substantially unchanged from IAS 17. Lessors will continue to classify leases as either operating or finance leases using
similar principles as in IAS 17. Therefore, IFRS 16 does not have an impact for leases where the Company is the lessor.
The Company adopted IFRS 16 using the modified retrospective
method of adoption, with the date of initial application of July 01, 2019.
The standard had significant impacts on the financial statements,
since, according to the new principles introduced by IFRS 16, the Company recognized lease liabilities and right-of-use assets
on the date of initial application for leases previously classified as operating leases. The Company’s main contract are
related to agricultural partnership operations and land lease, in addition to other less relevant contracts that involve the lease
of machinery, vehicles and properties (Note 13).
The Company elected to use the
transition practical expedient to not reassess whether a contract is, or contains, a lease at July 01, 2019. Instead, the Company
applied the standard only to contracts that were previously identified as leases applying IAS 17 and IFRIC 4 at the date of initial
application. The Company also elected to use the recognition exemptions for lease contracts that, at the commencement date, have
a lease term of 12 months or less and do not contain a purchase option (short-term leases), and lease contracts for which the underlying
asset is of low value (low-value assets).
The right-of-use of the asset
were measured at the amount equivalent to the lease liability, adjusted by the amount of any payments made in advance or accumulated
related to these leases that were recognized in the balance sheet immediately prior to the initial adoption of the standard. Lease
liabilities are discounted to present value using the incremental borrowing rate of the lessee on the transition date.
The impacts of IFRS 16 upon
its initial adoption as of July 01, 2019 are presented below. The initial adoption of IFRS 16 did not produce any impacts in equity:
The interpretation addresses
the accounting for income taxes when tax treatments involve uncertainty that affects the application of IAS 12 and does not apply
to taxes or levies outside the scope of IAS 12, nor does it specifically include requirements relating to interest and penalties
associated with uncertain tax treatments.
An entity must determine whether
to consider each uncertain tax treatment separately or together with one or more other uncertain tax treatments. The approach that
better predicts the resolution of the uncertainty should be followed. The interpretation is effective for annual reporting periods
beginning on or after January 01, 2019, but certain transition reliefs are available. The Company adopted the standard as of July
1, 2019 and concluded that there are no significant effects on its consolidated financial statements.
In fiscal year starting July 1,
2018, the Company adopted IFRS 9, Financial Instruments and IFRS 15, Revenues from Contracts with Customers. The adoption of these
new standards did not have any impact in the Company’s statement of income, except for the amended and additional disclosures
required by these standards.
The IASB issued the final version
of IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments, which replaces IAS 39 – Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement and all
previous versions of IFRS 9. IFRS 9 combines the three aspects of the project for accounting for financial instruments: classification
and measurement, asset impairment, and hedge accounting. The standard is applicable for fiscal years beginning on January 1, 2018.
Starting July 1, 2018, the Company
applied IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments as the basis for recognition, classification and measurement of financial instruments.
The main aspects of the new
standard applicable to the Company are described below:
IFRS 9 contains a new approach
for the classification and measurement of financial assets that reflect the business model under which assets and their cash flow
characteristics are managed. It contains three main categories to classify financial instruments: measured at amortized cost, at
fair value through other comprehensive income, and at fair value through profit or loss. The standard eliminates the categories
existing in IAS 39 of financial instruments held to maturity, loans and receivables and financial instruments available for sale.
This change of nomenclature does not alter how financial instruments are subsequently measured; it only impacts the disclosure
of financial instruments by category in the financial statements, as shown below:
The new standard replaced the
“incurred losses” model of IAS 39 for a prospective model of “expected credit losses.”
This requires significant judgment
on how changes in economic factors affect expected credit losses. Such provisions are measured in credit losses expected for 12
months and credit losses expected for the lifetime of the asset, that is, credit losses that result from all possible default events
throughout the expected life of a financial instrument.
The Company selected to apply
the simplified approach of IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments to measure the credit losses expected throughout the expected life
of the financial instrument.
During the year, the Company
carried out a detailed evaluation of the impact of IFRS 9 aspects. The conclusion of the evaluation is that there is no relevant
impact on the adoption of IFRS 9 on impairment of financial assets due to the fact that the Company already analyses each client
individualy for expected losses and the level of losses incurred in receivables is not relevant.
IFRS 15 establishes a five-step
model to account for revenues from agreements with clients. According to IFRS 15, revenue is recognized for a value that reflects
the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for the transfer or goods or services to a client. The
new standard on revenue will replace all current requirements for recognition of revenue in accordance with IFRS.
Starting from July 1, 2018,
the Company adopted the IFRS 15 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers.
The standard provides the principles
to be applied by an entity to determine the measurement of revenue and how and when it must be recognized, based on five steps:
i) identification of the agreements with clients; ii) identification of the performance obligations within the agreements; iii)
determination of the transaction price; iv) allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations within the agreements;
and v) recognition of revenue when the performance obligation is fulfilled.
The changes establish the criteria
for measurement and registration of sales, as they were effectively made with due presentation, as well as registration of the
values to which the Company is entitled in the operation, considering any estimates of impairment loss.
(a) Sales
of agricultural products (grains, cotton and sugarcane) and beef cattle
For contracts with customers
in which the sale of agricultural prodcuts and beef cattle is generally expected to be the only performance obligation, adoption
of IFRS 15 did not present any impact on the Company’s revenue and statement of income.
The Company expects the revenue
recognition to occur at a point in time when control of the agricultural products and beef cattle is transferred to the customer,
generally on delivery.
For sales of land, revenue is
recognized when risks and benefits of ownership of the land is transferred to the customer. This is considered to be the only performance
obligation and therefore, according to IFRS 15, revenue is recognized at a point in time, generally when possession of the land
is granted to the customer.
The presentation and
disclosure requirements in IFRS 15 are more detailed than the past IFRS. The presentation requirements represent a
significant change from past practice and increases the volume of disclosures required in the Company’s financial
statements. As required by IFRS 15, the Company needs to disaggregate revenue recognized from contracts with customers into
categories that depict how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows are affected by economic
factors. It also needs to disclose information about the relationship between the disclosure of disaggregated revenue and
revenue information disclosed for each reportable segment.
The Company analyzed the new
standard and identified no relevant impacts on their financial statements, considering the nature of their sale transactions, in
which performance obligations are clear and the transfer of control over assets is not complex (it is made to the extent the ownership
and benefit are transferred to the beneficiaries).
In October 2018, the IASB issued
amendments to IFRS 3 regarding the definition of a business to help entities to determine if a set of activities and assets acquired is a business
or not. They clarify the minimum requirements for a company, eliminate the assessment of if market participants are capable of
replacing missing elements, include guidelines to help entities to evaluate if an acquired process is substantive, determine better
the definitions of business and outputs and introduce a test of concentration of optional fair value. New illustrative cases were
provided with the amendments.
Since the amendments apply prospectively
to transactions or other events occurring on the date or after the first-time adoption, the Company will not be affected by these
amendments on the transition date.
In October 2018, IASB issued
amendments to IAS 1 and IAS 8 – Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors to align the definition of omission in all standards, with the information
material if omitting, misstating or obscuring if it could reasonably influence decisions that the primary users of general purpose
financial statements make on the basis of those financial statements, which provide financial information about a specific reporting
entity
Such amendments are not expected
to have a significant impact on Company’s individual and consolidated financial statements.
There are no other standards
and interpretations issued and not yet adopted that may, in the opinion of the Management, significantly impact profit or loss
or shareholders’ equity disclosed by the Company.
Accounting estimates and judgments
are continuously assessed and based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are
believed to be reasonable under the current circumstances.
Based on the assumptions, the
Company concerning its future. The resulting accounting estimates will, by definition, seldom equal the related actual amounts.
The estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material misstatement to the carrying amounts of assets
and liabilities within the next year are as follows:
The Company is party to different
legal and administrative proceedings, as described in Note 27. Provisions are set up for all the contingencies related to legal
claims that are estimated to represent probable losses (present obligations resulting from past events in which an outflow of resources
is probable, and amounts can be reliably estimated). The evaluation of the likelihood of loss is responsibility of the Company
and includes the opinion of outside legal advisors.
The fair value of biological
assets recorded in the balance sheet (Note 9) was determined using valuation techniques, including the discounted cash flow method.
The inputs for these estimates are based on those observable in the market, whenever possible, and when such inputs are not available,
a certain level of judgment is required to estimate the fair value. Judgment includes considerations on data e.g. price, productivity,
crop cost and production cost.
Changes in the assumptions on these factors might affect the fair value recognized for biological
assets.
An increase or decrease by 1%
in the expected productivity of sugarcane and grains/cotton would result in an increase or decrease in biological asset by R$1,544
and an increase or decrease by 1% in the price of sugarcane and grains/cotton would result in an increase or decrease in biological
asset by R$2,203.
With regard to cattle, the Company
values its stock at fair value based on market price publicly available for the region.
The fair value of investment
properties was determined through an appraisal prepared by the Company.
The appraisal was performed
by means of standards adopted in the market considering the characteristics, location, type of soil, climate of the region, calculation
of improvements, presentation of the elements and calculation of the land value, which may differ based on these variables.
At June 30, 2020, investment
properties were valued by applying the comparative analysis methodology adjusted by its related features:
i) The
valuation relied, among other aspects, on the following information: (i) location of farms, (ii) total area and its related percentages
of opening and use;
ii) The
market value presented for the farm corresponds to the portion of bare land, for payment in cash, not including machinery, equipment,
agricultural inputs, cultivation. The soil adjustment factor (preparation of land for planting) was considered in the assessment
of prices;
iii) The
value of land for agriculture in the surveyed region, is referenced to the price of soybean bag. The unit amounts of the farms
for sale (market researches) were obtained in soybean bags per hectare. Accordingly, the amount in Reais (R$) of the property varies
directly due to the variation in the soybean price; and
iv) The
soybean price considered at June 30, 2020, was R$85.86 (West Region – Bahia), R$86.76 (Balsas Region – Maranhão),
R$84.05 (Alto Taquari Region – Mato Grosso) and R$84.05 (Mineiros Region – Goiás). This amount represents an
average in amounts arbitrated by the real estate market of the region due to the great instability in the price of soybean bag.
There were no changes in the
valuation methodology used to estimate the fair value of the investment properties.
The Company recognizes deferred
income tax assets and liabilities, as described in Note 17, on tax loss carryforwards and temporary differences between the carrying
amount and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using statutory rates. The Company regularly assesses if the deferred income
tax assets recognized are recoverable, considering the taxable profit generated in the past as well as the expected future taxable
profit, in accordance with a technical feasibility study performed by the Company.
The Company analyzes its agreements
in accordance with the requirements of IFRS 16 and recognizes right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for the lease operations
under agreements that meet the requirements of the accounting standard. Management considers as the lease component only the minimum
fixed lease payments for the purpose of measuring the lease liabilities. The measurement of lease liabilities corresponds to the
total future payments of leases and rentals, adjusted to present value, considering the incremental borrowing rate.
The Company analyzes its agreements
in accordance with the requirements of IFRS 16 and recognizes right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for the lease operations
under agreements that meet the requirements of the accounting standard. The Management of the Company considers as the lease component
only the minimum fixed value for the purpose of measuring the lease liabilities. The measurement of lease liabilities corresponds
to the total future payments of leases and rentals, adjusted to present value, considering the nominal discount rate which ranges
between 4.82% and 6.91%.
For the cases where payments
are indexed to the soybean bag, future minimum payments are estimated in number of soybean bags and translated into local currency
using the soybean price of each region, on the base date of first-time adoption of IFRS 16, and adjusted to the current price at
time of payment. Meanwhile, payments indexed to Consecana are stipulated in tons of sugarcane and translated into local currency
based on the Consecana price in effect at the time.
The Company operates with various
financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, trade accounts receivables, accounts receivable
and others, trade accounts payable, accounts payable for the purchase of farms, loans and financing and derivative financial instruments.
Certain Company’s operations
expose it to market risks, mainly in relation to exchange rates, interest rates and changes in the prices of agricultural commodities.
As a result, the Company also enters into derivative financial instruments, used to hedge its exposures with respect to crops or
with respect to assets and liabilities recognized in the balance sheet, depending on the nature of the specific operation.
Excluding derivative financial
instruments, fair value is basically determined using the discounted cash flow method.
The
amounts recorded under current assets and liabilities are either highly liquid or mature within twelve months, as such their
carrying value approximates their fair value.
The Company’s policies
in respect to transactions with financial instruments, which have been approved by the Board of Directors, are as follows: (i) Investment
Policy which provides guidelines in respect to Company’s investment of cash, considering the counterparty risk, the nature
of instruments and liquidity, among others; (ii) Derivative financial instrument policy which provides guidelines to manage
the Company’s exposures to currency risk, interest rate and index risks, and agricultural commodities price risk, always
linking the derivative financial instrument to the asset or liability that generates the exposure; and (iii) Risk Policy,
which addresses items not covered by the Investment Policy or the Derivative financial instrument Policy including hedge against
future cash flows with respect to future production of commodities.
a) Cash and
cash equivalents, marketable securities, trade accounts receivable, receivable from sale of farms, loans with related parties and
accounts payable. The amounts recorded approximate their estimated fair value.
b) Loans,
financing and debentures. The book value of loans, financing and debentures, denominated in reais have its interest rates either
fixed or based on the variation of TJLP (Long Term Interest Rate), SELIC (Special System of Clearance and Custody Rate) and exchange
rate and approximates their fair value.
This risk arises from the possibility
that the Company may incur losses due to fluctuations in exchange rates, which reduces the nominal amount of assets or increase
the amount of liabilities. This risk also arises with respect to commitments to sell products existing in inventories or agricultural
products not yet harvested when sales are made at prices to be fixed at a future date, prices which vary depending on the exchange
rate.
This risk arises from the possibility
that the Company may incur losses due to fluctuations in the interest rates or indices which increase financial expenses related
to certain contracts for the acquisition of farms, indexed by inflation, such as the IGP-M rate (“FGV”).
This risk arises from the possibility
that the Company may incur losses due to fluctuations in the market prices of agricultural products.
The Executive Board is responsible
for managing financial risks, and evaluates the Company’s exposure to foreign currency risk, interest rate and index risk
and agricultural commodities price risk with respect to assets, liabilities and transactions of the Company. Considering the exposure
to such risks, Company management evaluates the convenience, cost and availability in the market of derivative financial instruments
which allow the Company to mitigate such risks. After such assessment, the Executive Board decides whether to enter into the transaction
within the parameters previously approved in the Policies referred to above, and reports it in the Board of Directors’ meetings.
The use of derivative financial
instruments as an economic hedge reduce the risks of changes in cash flows arising from risks such as foreign currency, interest
rate and price index and agricultural commodities prices.
However the change in the fair
value of the derivative financial instrument may differ from the change in the cash flows or fair value of the assets, liabilities
or forecasted transactions which are being hedged, as a result of different factors, such as, among others, differences between
the contract dates, the maturity and settlement dates, or differences in “spreads” on the financial assets and liabilities
being hedged and the corresponding spreads in the related legs of the swaps. In the case of the derivative financial instruments
strategy to hedge recognized assets and liabilities, management believes that the derivative financial instruments present a high
degree of protection with respect to the changes in the assets and liabilities being hedged.
In the case of the strategy
to hedge forecasted sales of soybean or to hedge accounts payable/receivable, which are susceptible to changes commodity prices,
differences may arise due to additional factors, such as differences between the estimated and actual soybean volume to be harvested,
or differences between the quoted price of soybean in the international markets where the derivative financial instruments are
quoted and the price of soybean in the markets in which soybean is physically delivered/received by the Company. Should the soybean
volume effectively harvested be lower than the amount for which derivative financial instruments were contracted, the Company will
be exposed to variations in the price of the commodities by the volume hedged in excess and vice-versa should the soybean volume
effectively harvested be higher than the hedged volume.
In the case of exposure to exchange
rates, there is a risk that the volume of U.S. dollars sold through forward contracts will be higher than the volume to which the
Company is exposed. In such case, foreign exchange rates risk continues to exist in the same proportion as the mismatch, which
could result from a reduction in the expected yield of a certain commodity or in a reduction in prices denominated in foreign currencies.
Additionally, the Company is
subjected to credit risk with respect to the counterparty of the derivative financial instrument. The Company has contracted derivative
financial instruments either traded in the stock exchanges market or from prime first-tier financial institutions or “trading”
companies. The Company understands that, at the balance sheet date, there are no indications of collectability risk with respect
to the amounts recognized as assets with respect to derivative financial instruments.
The gains and losses for changes
in the fair value of derivative financial instruments are recognized in the statement of income separately between realized profit
and loss (corresponding to derivative financial instruments that have already been settled) and unrealized profit and loss (corresponding
to derivative financial instruments not yet settled).
The fair value of derivative
financial instruments traded on stock exchanges (B3 and Chicago Board of Trade) is determined based on the quoted prices at the
balance sheet date. To estimate the fair value of derivative financial instruments not traded on stock exchanges the Company uses
quotes for similar instruments or information available in the market and uses valuation methodologies widely used and that are
also used by the counterparties. The estimates do not necessarily guarantee that such operations may be settled at the estimated
amounts. The use of different market information and/or valuation methodologies may have a relevant effect on the amount of the
estimated fair value.
Specific methodologies used
for derivative financial instruments entered into by the Company:
Management identified for each
type of derivative financial instrument the conditions for variation in foreign exchange rates, interest rates or commodities prices
which may generate loss on assets and/or liabilities which is being hedged or, in the case of derivative financial instruments
related to transactions not recorded in the balance sheet, in the fair value of the contracted derivatives.
The sensitivity analysis shows
the impact from the changes in the market variables on the aforementioned financial instruments of the Company, considering all
other market indicators comprised. Upon their settlement, such amounts may differ from those stated below, due to the estimates
used in their preparation.
This analysis contemplates
five distinct scenarios that differ due to the intensity of variation in relation to the current market. At June 30, 2020, as reference
for probable scenarios I, II, III and IV, a variation in relation to the current market of 0%, -25%, -50%, +25%, +50%, respectively,
was considered.
The preparation of the probable
scenario took into consideration the market prices of each one of the reference assets of derivative financial instruments held
by the Company at year end. Since all these assets are traded in competitive and open markets, the current market price is a meaninful
reference for the expected price of these assets. Accordingly, since the current market price was the reference for the calculation
of both book value and the Probable Scenario, it resulted in no mathematical difference.
This sensitivity analysis aims
to measure the impact of variable market changes on the aforementioned financial instruments of the Company, considering all other
market indicators remain unchanged. Estimated amounts below can significantly differ from amount eventually settled.
In addition, the Company presents
a summary of possible scenarios for the following 12 months of the Company’s financial instruments. Reliable sources of
index disclosure were used for the rates used in the “probable scenario”.
Credit risk refers to the risk
of the noncompliance by a counterparty of its contractual obligations, leading the Company to incur financial losses. The risk
to which the Company is exposed arises from the possibility of not recovering the amounts receivable from the sale of sugarcane,
grains, and from the leasing of land.
To reduce credit risk in commercial transactions, the Company adopts the practice of defining
credit limits in which it analyzes factors such as: the counteerparty’s history, history of its business, commercial references
and Credit Protection Institution (Serasa). The Company also constantly monitors the outstanding balances.
Currently, management does
not expect losses due to the default of its counterparties and has no significant exposure to any individual counterparty.
Management policy is to maintain
sufficient cash and marketable securities to comply with its financial commitments, due to the mismatch of terms or volume between
the estimated amounts receivables and payables.
The table below shows the Company’s
financial liabilities by maturity. The amounts disclosed in the table are the discounted contractual cash flows, in addition to
the net derivative financial instruments, which are recorded at fair value/. With respect to payables for the purchase of farms
all amounts due at June 30, 2020 and 2019 are payable upon the fulfillment of certain conditions precedent by the sellers and as
a result its payment date cannot be determined and have been considered as payable on demand in the table below and no interest
or other financial charges have been considered.
The Company’s objectives
when managing capital are to safeguard the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern in order to provide returns for
stockholders and benefits for other stakeholders, and to maintain an optimal capital structure to reduce the cost of capital.
In order to maintain or adjust
the capital structure, the Company may adjust the amount of dividend paid to stockholders, return capital to stockholders or, also,
issue new shares or sell assets to reduce, for example, debt.
Consistent with others in the
industry, the Company monitors capital based on the leverage ratio. This ratio is calculated as net debt divided by total equity.
Net debt is calculated as total loans, financing and debentures (including “current and noncurrent loans and financing”
as shown in the Consolidated statement of financial position), acquisitions payable and derivatives less cash and cash equivalents
and marketable securities..
The carrying amount (less impairment)
of trade accounts receivable and payables approximate their fair values. The fair value of financial liabilities, for disclosure
purposes, is estimated by discounting the future contractual cash flows at the current market interest rate that is available for
similar financial instruments.
The Company adopted IFRS 7
and IFRS 13 for financial instruments that are measured in the balance sheet at fair value; this requires disclosure of fair value
measurements by level of the following fair value measurement hierarchy:
The significant non-observable
inputs used in the measurement of the fair value of the credits from the sale of the farm classified as Level 3 in the fair value
hierarchy, along with an analysis of quantitative sensitivity on June 30, 2020, are as follows. There were no reclassifications
from levels 1 to 2 or from levels 2 to 3:
The Company has R$27,688 (R$21,390
as of June 30, 2019), of bank balances denominated in foreign currencies which do not bear any interest.
(a) Indexed
to rates from 98% to 99% of the CDI – Interbank Deposit Certificate.
(b) The
securities in BNB consist of CDBs provided as collateral for financing from the Bank and must be held up to the end of the contract.
The Company uses derivative
financial instruments such as forward currency contracts and forward commodities contracts to hedge against currency risk and commodities
prices, respectively.
The margin deposits in operations
with derivatives refer to the so-called margins by counterparties in operations with derivative instruments.
The total fair value of a derivative
is classified as non-current assets or liabilities if the remaining maturity of the derivative is over 12 months, and as current
assets or liabilities if the remaining maturity of the derivative is less than 12 months.
The Company has two sugarcane
supply agreements. The first agreement was with Brenco Companhia Brasileira de Energia Renovável and the second agreement
is included in the partnership IV Agreement, as mentioned in the explanatory note on Commitments, whose credit risks are assessed
in accordance with the internal policy as presented in Note 4.8b.
No expected credit allowance
was noted at June 30, 2020, and there is no record of default until the date of disclosure of these Financial Statements.
For the year ended June 30,
2020 and 2019, corn and soybean were sold mainly to the clients Cargill, Bunge Alimentos, Glencore and Gavilon, respectively.
Total amounts sold, collected
and receivables from sale of farms are as follows:
In the case of sales for which official
measurement during or upon termination of the agreement is mandatory, the Company adopts the variable consideration concept set
forth in IFRS 15 – Revenue and does not recognize 2.3% of the sale until the measurement is made. This percentage, whose
calculation is based on the highest historical deviation plus a safety margin, represents the risk of proportional reversion upon
sale recognition if there is any difference between the area negotiated and the area delivered. The Company has never delivered
a narrower area than the negotiated area and recognizes the 2.3% of revenue from sale after the official measurement.
The following table provides a breakdown
of credits with the variable consideration element:
The amounts of expenditures
with plantation and tilling of crops are substantially represented by expenditures with the formation of harvest such as: seeds,
fertilizers, pesticides, depreciation and manpowers used in the crops.
The area (hectares) to be harvested
corresponding to the biological assets is as follows:
The significant non-observable inputs used
in the measurement of the fair value of sugarcane, grains and cotton classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy, along with
an analysis of quantitative sensitivity on June 30, 2020, are as follows. There were no reclassifications among the levels during
the year.
Four farms owned by the Company
are held as guarantee for loans and financing according to Note 15, representing 30% of total investment properties.
The table below shows the fair
value of investment properties are as follows:
Cresca’s summarized financial
information, based on the financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS as of and for years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019,
and the reconciliation with the book value of the investment in the consolidated financial statements are presented below at the
fair value adjustment on the acquisition date:
Changes in financial leases during the year
ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 are as follows:
As of June 30, 2020, the Company’s
main contracts subject to IFRS 16 are related to agricultural partnership and land lease operations, as well as other less relevant
contracts that involve leases of machinery, vehicles and properties.
Changes in lease liabilities occur upon
effective payment of the lease as well as periodic restatement by variation in the soybean or sugarcane price and adjustment to
present value. The impacts from adjustment to present value are recognized under financial income (loss), net in the income statement.
As of June 30, 2020, the Company and its
subsidiaries held the following lease agreements from third parties:
The above lease liabilities, which are
under IFRS 16, are discounted to present value using an incremental borrowing rate that ranges from 4.82% to 6.91%.
The lease agreements with third parties
of the Company are indexed to the price of the soybean bag in the region where each unit is located, except for Parceria III and
Headquarters, where the price is determined via Consecana and fixed payments, respectively. For the cases where payments are indexed
to the soybean bag, future minimum payments are estimated in number of soybean bags and translated into local currency using the
soybean price of each region, on the base date of first-time adoption of IFRS 16, and adjusted to the current price at time of
payment. Meanwhile, payments indexed to Consecana are determined in tons of sugarcane and translated into local currency based
on the Consecana price in effect at the time.
The future minimum lease payments of the
aforementioned leases are detailed below:
At June 30, 2020, the Company’s
balance of trade accounts payable is as follows:
FINAME – Financing of Machinery
and Equipment (National Bank for Economic and Social Development - BNDES)
Maturities of short- and long-term loans and
financing are broken down as follows:
Changes in loans and financing
during the year ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 are as follows:
All
loans and financing contracts above are in Reais and have specific terms and conditions defined in the respective contracts with
governmental economic and development agencies that directly or indirectly grant those loans. At June 30, 2020 and June 30, 2019
the Company’s financial agreements did not require compliance with financial covenants, but rather only operating covenants,
on which the Company is in compliance.
On May 25, 2018, one hundred
forty-two thousand, two hundred (142,200) non-convertible debentures were subscribed to and paid in, with security interest, in
the total of R$142,200 (R$85,200 for the first series and R$57,000 for the second series).
The maturity date of the first-series
debentures is August 1, 2022 (“maturity date of the first series”) and their unit face value will be paid in three
(3) annual installments, the first on July 30, 2020 and the final on the maturity date of the first series. Compensatory interest
corresponding to one hundred six point fifty percent (106.50%) of the DI rate will be accrued on the unit face value of first-series
debentures, which will be paid on July 30 of each year or on the maturity date of the first series. The maturity date of the second-series
debentures is July 31, 2023 (“maturity date of the second series”) and their unit face value will be paid in four (4)
annual installments, the first on July 30, 2020 and the final on the maturity date of the second series. Compensatory interest
corresponding to one hundred ten percent (110.00%) of the overnight DI rate will be accrued on the unit face value of second-series
debentures, which will be paid on July 30 of each year or on the maturity date of the second series.
The Debentures were linked to
a securitization transaction, serving as guarantee for the issue of Certificates of Agribusiness Receivables (“CRA”)
pursuant to Law 11,076/2004 and CVM Instruction 414/2004, which were the object of a public distribution offer with restricted
efforts, under CVM Instruction 476/2009 (“Restricted Offer”).
The Debentures are backed by
security interest in the form of fiduciary sale of properties owned by the Company and registered under no. 6,254, 6,267 and 6,405,
all of them at the Property Records Office of Correntina in the state of Bahia.
The debentures have covenants
related to the maintenance of certain financial indicators, based on the ratio of net debt to fair value of investment properties. Failure
by the Company to attain these indicators during the term of the debentures may entail advance maturity of the debt.
As of June 30, 2020, the Company
is in compliance with the covenants described above.
Deferred income and social contribution
tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legal right to offset tax credits against tax liabilities, and provided that
they refer to the same tax authority and the same legal entity.
The fiscal year for income tax
and social contribution calculation purposes is different from that adopted by the Company for the preparation of its consolidated
financial statements, which ends June 30 of each year.
Deferred income tax and social contribution
tax assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2020 and 2019 are as follows:
On June 30, 2019, there
were no outstanding balances under Other liabilities.
The maturities of accounts
payable due to acquisition of Serra Grande Farm are broken down as follows:
At June 30, 2020, the Company’s
subscribed and paid-up capital amounted to R$699,811 (R$584,224 at June 30, 2019). The Company is authorized to increase its capital,
regardless of amendments to the articles of incorporation, up to the limit of R$3,000,000, as determined by the Board of Directors.
Capital Reserves are composed
of amounts received by the company that are not registered under profit or loss as revenue, since they refer to amounts allocated
to capital reinforcement, which did not involve any effort from the company in delivering the goods or services.
The reserve recorded on June 30, 2020 is related to the acquisition
of the subsidiary Agrifirma on January 27, 2020 (Note 1.1), a transaction conducted via exchange of shares that generated a difference
between the amount of the capital increase and the consideration transferred related to the unrestricted shares, as shown below:
The information on the share-based
compensation plan is described in Note 23.
Pursuant to article 193 of Law
No. 6404/76 and article 36, item (a), 5% (five per cent) of the Company’s net income at the end of each year must, before
any other allocation, be used to set up a legal reserve, which shall not exceed 20% (twenty percent) of capital.
The Company is allowed not
to set up the legal reserve for the financial year in which the reserve balance, plus the amount of capital reserve addressed in
item 1, of article 182, of Law No. 6404/76, exceeds 30% (thirty per cent) of capital. The legal reserve aims at assuring the
integrity of the Company’s capital and may only be used to offset loss and increase capital.
According to article 36, item
(c), of the Company’s articles of incorporation and article 196 of Law No. 6404/76, the Company may allocate the remaining
portion of adjusted net income for the year ended, to reserve for investment and expansion, subject to approval on the General
Shareholders’ Meeting.
The balance of the retained
profits reserve, except for the reserves of unrealized profit and reserves for contingencies, may not exceed the amount of capital.
Once this maximum limit is reached, the General Meeting may resolve on the investment of the exceeding portion in the payment,
increase of capital or in dividend distribution.
On November 14, 2019, the Company
paid the dividends approved at the Annual Shareholders Meeting held on October 16, 2019, which included minimum mandatory dividends
of R$42,056 and additional dividends proposed of R$7,944. In accordance with article 40 of the Bylaws, dividends not received or
claimed will be time-barred within three (3) years from the date they were made available to the shareholder, and will revert to
the Company.
Pursuant to article 36, of
the Company’s Bylaws, profit for the year shall be allocated as follows after allocation to legal reserve: (i) 25% (twenty
five percent) of adjusted net profit shall be allocated to the payment of mandatory dividends and (ii) the remaining portion of
adjusted net income may be allocated to the reserve for investment and expansion.
The allocation of net income
for the year as of June 30, 2020 is as follows:
At June 30, 2020, the effects
from foreign exchange rate differences arising from the translation of Cresca, Palmeiras and Moroti financial statements amounted
to R$76,463 (negative (R$1,007) on June 30, 2019 and R$27,084 on June 30, 2018), and the accumulated effect totalled to R$115,339
as of June 30, 2020 (R$38,876 as of June 30, 2019 and R$39,883 as of June 30, 2018, due to the write-off of (R$30,616) upon the
re-distribution of the assets and liabilities of Cresca in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018).
Under article 20, item XII
of the Bylaws of the Company, the Board of Directors is responsible, among others established in the law or the Bylaws, for deliberating
on the acquisition by the Company of shares issued by itself, to be held in treasury and/or later cancellation or sale.
On March 15, 2006, the Board
of Directors approved the issuance of 512,000 shares subscription warrants, 256,000 of which for first issue, and 256,000 for second
issue, which were delivered to the founder shareholders, in proportion to their interest in the Company’s capital at the
date of issue of the subscription warrant. Each issue of subscription warrant grants their holders the right to subscribe shares
issued by the Company, in an amount equivalent to 20% of its capital after the increase arising from the full exercise of the subscription
warrant of each issue.
Subscription warrants of the
first issue grant their holders, as from the dates on which they become exercisable, the right to subscribe the shares issued by
the Company through the payment of the price per share used in the initial public offering, subject to certain restatement and
adjustment rules. The subscription warrants of the first issue were issued in three series, which differ solely as to the date
on which the right to subscribe the shares granted by them start.
Exceptionally,
the subscription warrants of the first issue may be exercised by their holders in the event of transfer of the Company’s
control or acquisition of material interest, as defined in the terms of the corporate documents that decided on the issue of the
subscription warrants.
The subscription warrants of
the second issue grant the holders the right to subscribe shares issued by the Company for up to 15 years, from the date of publication
of the announcement of closing of the initial public offering of shares and solely in the events of transfer or acquisition of
material shareholding control in the Company, as defined in the terms of the corporate document that decided on the issue of the
subscription warrants. In such events, public offerings for acquisition of all the outstanding shares of the Company shall be presented.
For the subscription of shares object of the subscription warrants of second issue, their holders shall be required to pay the
same price per share used in the abovementioned public offerings of acquisition of the Company’s shares.
The number of shares to be subscribed
according to the subscription warrants shall be adjusted in case of split or reverse split of shares. The detailed information
of the second issue market value of these subscription warrants is shown in the table below:
Segment information is presented
consistently with the internal report provided by the chief operating decision maker that is the Executive Board, responsible for
allocating resources, assessing the performance of the operating segments, and for making the Company’s strategic decisions.
Segment information is based
on information used by BrasilAgro executive board to assess the performance of the operating segments and to make decisions on
the investment of funds. The Company has six segments, namely: (i) real estate, (ii) grains, (iii) sugarcane, (iv) cattle raising,
(v) cotton and (vi) other. The operating assets related to these segments are located only in Brazil. The main activity of the
grains segment is the production and sale of soybean and corn.
The Real Estate segment presents
the P&L from operations carried out in the Company’s subsidiaries.
The cattle raising segment consists
of producing and selling beef calves after weaning, which characterizes the activity as breeding and fattening of cattle.
The cotton segment is engaged
primarily in the production and sale of cotton lint and seed.
The selected P&L, liabilities
and assets information by segment, which were measured in accordance with the same accounting practices used in the preparation
of the financial statements, are as follows:
The balance sheet accounts are
mainly represented by “Trade accounts receivables”, “Biological assets”, “Inventories of agricultural
products” and “Investment properties”.
In the year ended June 30, 2020,
the Company has four clients individually representing 10% or more of consolidated revenues, representing 73% of the total sales
of the Company. Of these four clients, two account for 100% of the revenues from the sugarcane segment and two account for 61%
of the revenues from the grains segment. There are no clients in other segments that represent 10% or more of revenue of total
sales.
In the year ended June 30, 2019,
the Company has four clients individually representing 10% or more of the revenues from the sugarcane or grains segments, representing
85% of the total sales of the Company. Of these four clients, two account for 100% of the revenues from the sugarcane segment and
two account for 71% of the revenues from the grains segment.
Revenues and noncurrent assets,
excluding financial instruments, income tax and social contribution, deferred assets and rights arising from insurance contracts
of the Consolidated, are distributed as follows:
The expenses with Management
compensation were recorded under “General and administrative expenses”, as follows:
The total compensation of the
Company’s officers and members of the Board of Directors, for the year ended June 30, 2020 in the amount of R$13,500, was
approved at the Annual General Meeting held on October 16, 2019.
On October 2, 2017, the Shareholders
Meeting approved the creation of the Long-term Share-based Incentive Plan (“ILPA Plan”). Under the terms of the ILPA
Plan, participants will be entitled to receive a certain number of shares if they remain in the Company for a vesting period and
achieve certain key performance indicators (“KPIs”). The ILPA Plan establishes that the Board of Directors will have
broad powers to implement the ILPA Plan and take all measures necessary for it. The shares to be granted under the ILPA Plan may
not exceed, at any time, the maximum and cumulative limit of 2% of the shares issued by the Company.
The first grant of incentives
was approved by the Board of Directors on June 18, 2018, when the 1st ILPA Program was approved and the beneficiaries,
number of shares to be granted, vesting period and KPIs to be achieved were defined.
Shares will be granted to participants
only if they remain employed by the Company until the end of the vesting period and achieve certain KPIs. One of the KPIs is a
certain percentage of appreciation of the price of the AGRO3 stock in the vesting period; if such percentage is not reached, participants
will not have the right to receive any shares. If the KPI of stock appreciation is achieved, the number of shares to be granted
will vary in three ranges, depending on the level of achievement of three other KPIs, and will be adjusted by the dividends per
share distributed in the vesting period, and will increase by an amount established in case the share appreciation exceeds the
floor price.
The fair value of the benefit
was estimated at R$8.61. To measure the fair value of the benefit, the Company considered the price of the AGRO3 stock on the date
of the grant and projected the probable range of stock price at the end of the vesting period based on the past performance of
the stock price in a period of 1 year and 4 months (compatible with the period between the grant in June 2018 and the end of the
vesting period in October 2018). Considering the volatility of the AGRO3 stock, the Company determined the probability of the stock
price at the end of the vesting period reaching the value necessary to achieve the appreciation KPI.
The maximum number of shares
to be issued is 441,563 (outstanding on June 30, 2019). In the period, no shares were cancelled or issued to the beneficiaries,
and the number of shares will be adjusted by the dividends per share distributed during the vesting period.
To determine the number of shares
and the compensation expense, in each fiscal year the Management determines the estimated number of shares to be granted based
on its best judgment of the portion of each of the three KPIs that does not depend on the stock price and the dividends to be paid
in the vesting period. The expense amount is adjusted on account of such revision and the effects are recognized prospectively.
The estimated expense is recognized upon the grant in June 2018, being appropriated linearly during the vesting period, between
October 2, 2017 and October 2, 2019.
Once the vesting period ended,
the Company conducted the settlement of the plan with the transfer of R$3,707 in shares. On June 30, 2020, the expenses of the
ILPA Plan and its charges amounted to R$3,529 (R$1,648 on June 30, 2019) and R$4,193, respectively. Accumulated expenses with the
plan amounted to 6,020 (R$2,491 on June 30, 2019).
The Company is involved in civil,
labor, environmental and tax lawsuits and administrative proceedings. The provision for probable losses arising from these lawsuits
is determined and updated by management, supported by the opinion of the Company’s external legal advisors.
The Company is party to legal
suits of civil, labor, environmental and tax natures, and administrative tax proceedings for which no provisions were set up, since
they involve risk of loss classified as possible by the Company and its external legal advisors. The contingencies are as follows:
For the year ended June 30,
2020, gross sugarcane sales of BrasilAgro to Brenco came to R$82.8 million, representing 16.9% of the Company’s total net
revenue.
The price of sugarcane ton delivered
was calculated on Total Sugar Recoverable (ATR) assessed on the sales date.
There is a future balance of
sugarcane to be delivered, the estimated quantity and amounts of which are difficult to be established considering the scenarios
of fluctuating market value and crop productivity.
On February 7, 2017, the Company
entered into an agricultural partnership agreement involving a property in São Raimundo das Mangabeiras, in the state of
Maranhão, named Partnership IV.
The third agreement deals with
sugarcane supply, in which the parties aim to regulate the price and conditions of supply, as well as the obligations of each party
in a cyclical system, which involves the need to supply sugarcane, in a certain delivery frequency and schedule that is consistent
with buyer’s receipt and production capacity.
For the year ended June 30,
2020, net sugarcane sales to Partnership IV came to R$110.2 million, representing 22.5% of the Company’s total net revenue.
The Company entered into a
Sale Commitment of a 2,160 hectare area of the Bananal Farm (“Bananal X”), a property located in the municipality of
Luís Eduardo Magalhães (Bahia), with 1,714 hectares of agricultural area and 446 hectares of legal reserve and permanent
preservation area.
The parties negotiated the
property for R$28,000, divided into seven installments, with an advance of R$2,000 to be paid in two installments, with the first
on February 20, 2019 and the second 30 days. The advances were received and are recorded as advances from customers.
A disagreement involving the
lessee of the area upon the sale impeded its recognition until this reporting date, and the asset remained registered under Non-current
assets held for sale. However, during July 2020, the parties concluded the agreement, the conditions precedent were fully met and,
on July 31, 2020, the ownership of the farm was transferred, consummating the sale of Bananal X.
IFRS 5 – Non-Current
Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations – establishes that non-current assets held for sale must be measured by
the lesser the book value registered to date and the fair value less selling expenses, accordingly the amount recognized on June
30, 2020 was:
The Company maintain (i) civil
liability insurance for all employees working at the farms, (ii) insurance for machinery, (iii) life insurance for all the employees,
as well as (iv) insurance for Directors and Officers (D&O) and for other Board members. The coverage amount is considered sufficient
by management to cover risks, if any, over its assets and/or liabilities. The Company assessed the risk of farm buildings and facilities
owned by the Group, as well as its inventories and biological assets, concluding that there is no need for other types of insurance
due to low likelihood of risks.
Below is the table of the liabilities
covered by insurance and the related amounts at June 30, 2020:
The Company concluded the sale
of the 2,160 hectares of the Bananal Farm, an area located in the municipality of Luís Eduardo Magalhães, state of
Bahia, with 1,714 agricultural hectares. The farm was registered as Non-Current Asset Held for Sale (Note 30) due to a disagreement
involving the lessee of the area upon the sale. The conditions precedent set forth in the Sale Commitment were fully met on July
31, 2020 after the receipt of R$5,500. The nominal sale value is R$28,000, of which R$7,500 already has been received by the Company.