HST Host Hotels and Resorts Inc

Our Board of Directors has nominated eight directors for election at this annual meeting to hold office until the next annual meeting and the election of their successors. All the nominees are currently directors. Mr. Bulls was nominated and elected to the Board in June 2021. Mr. Bulls was initially identified as a director candidate by an independent director and a third-party search firm. In February 2022, Mr. John B. Morse, Jr. expressed his intention to retire from the Board at the conclusion of his current term and, accordingly, his term will end at the conclusion of the 2022 annual meeting. The Board determined that, effective at the conclusion of the 2022 annual meeting, the size of the Board will be decreased from nine to eight directors. The Board is engaged in a search for a new director as part of its ongoing refreshment efforts. See “Corporate Governance and Board Matters – Process for Selecting Directors.”

Each nominee has consented to serve if elected, but if any director nominee is unavailable to serve (an event which our Board does not now anticipate), the proxies named on your proxy card will vote for a substitute nominee recommended by the Board. Alternatively, should such circumstances arise, the Board may decide to reduce the size of the Board and the number of nominees.

Board Skills, Qualifications, Diversity and Tenure

The Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee reviews the composition of the Board in light of the Company’s changing requirements and its annual assessment of the Board’s performance. The Committee and Board seek a complementary mix of individuals with diverse backgrounds and skills reflecting the broad set of challenges that the Board confronts.

There are general qualifications that all directors must have, which are described in the Committee’s charter and the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, including integrity and high ethical standards, mature and independent judgment, diverse business experience, familiarity with the issues affecting the Company’s business, and a commitment to full participation on the Board and its committees. The Committee also considers other criteria, including: experience in running a major enterprise, sound business acumen, experience as a board member of another publicly held company, academic expertise in an area of the Company’s operations, and a reputation, both personal and professional, consistent with the image and reputation of the Company.

The Board and the Committee are also committed to a diversified membership, in terms of both the individuals involved and their experience. As stated in the Committee’s charter, the Committee may take into account the overall diversity of the Board, including professional background, experience, thought, perspective, age, tenure, gender, and ethnicity.

The Board and the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee believe it is important for the Board to be “refreshed” by adding new directors from time to time. The Committee and the Board also believe that longer serving directors bring critical skills and knowledge to the Board. Among other things, senior directors bring a historical perspective to the Board, which is highly relevant in a cyclical business such as the lodging industry. In addition, the Committee and the Board believe that longer serving directors have acquired extensive knowledge of the business that tends to make them less dependent upon management for information and perspectives. Accordingly, while the Committee considers tenure as a factor in determining the nominee slate, it is not a primary driver of decisions.

9

Below each nominee’s biography, we have included an assessment of the skills and experience of such nominee. We have also included a chart that provides a skills assessment for the full Board.

Voting Standard

Each director nominee stands for election every year. Except in a contested election, each director will be elected only if he or she receives more votes “for” than votes “against.” As set forth in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, any director nominee who is not elected by the vote required and who is an incumbent director must promptly tender his or her resignation to the Board for consideration. The Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee will then make a recommendation to the Board as to whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation, or whether other action is recommended. The Board will act on the tendered resignation within 90 days and will promptly disclose its decision and rationale as to whether to accept the resignation or the reasons for rejecting the resignation. If a director’s resignation is accepted by the Board, or if a nominee for director is not elected and is not an incumbent director, the Board may fill the resulting vacancy or decrease the size of the Board.

10

RICHARD E. MARRIOTT		Mr. Marriott is our chairman of the board. He is also chairman of the board of First Media Corporation, the chairman and a director of the J. Willard Marriott and Alice S. Marriott Foundation, a director of the Richard E. and Nancy P. Marriott Foundation, and the president and a trustee of the Marriott Foundation for People with Disabilities. Mr. Marriott serves on the Federal City Council and the National Advisory Council of Brigham Young University. He previously served on the board of Marriott International, Inc. and is a past president of the National Restaurant Association and a past director of the Polynesian Cultural Center.   Skills and Expertise:   •  comprehensive knowledge of the Company and unique perspective and insight into the hospitality industry based on a 56-year history with the Company and Marriott International   •  during his tenure, Mr. Marriott has served in various executive capacities and has served as our Chairman since 1993   •  long history of successful management of the Company
Chairman of the Board
Age: 83  Director since: 1993

12

13

Summary of 2022 Director Qualifications and Experience

The Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee and the full Board believe a complementary mix of diverse skills, attributes and experiences will best serve the Company and its stockholders. The director skills summary that appears below, and the related narrative for each director nominee, highlight the specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills for each director that the Board considers important in determining whether each nominee should serve on the Board in light of the Company’s business, structure, and strategic direction. The absence of a “•” for a particular skill does not mean the director in question is unable to contribute to the decision-making process in that area.

16

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS

Corporate Governance and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Our Board of Directors oversees the management of the Company and its business for the benefit of our stockholders in order to enhance stockholder value over the long-term. The Board has adopted corporate governance guidelines, which are reviewed annually and periodically amended as the Board enhances the Company’s corporate governance practices. The Board has also adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to all directors, officers and employees of the Company. The purpose of the code of conduct is to promote honest and ethical conduct; full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in periodic reports required to be filed by the Company; and compliance with all applicable rules and regulations that apply to the Company and its officers, employees and directors. The corporate governance guidelines, code of conduct and other documents describing the Company’s corporate governance practices can be accessed in the “Governance” section of the Company’s website at www.hosthotels.com. Copies of these documents are also available in print to stockholders upon request.

Governance is a continuing focus of the Company. Over the years, the Board has implemented numerous corporate governance enhancements to strengthen the rights of stockholders and to serve their long-term interests. These have included:

Independence of Directors

It is the Board’s policy that a majority of the directors of the Company be independent. To be considered independent, a director must not have a relationship with the Company that could interfere with the exercise of the director’s independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. To be considered independent, directors must also be “independent” within the meaning of The Nasdaq Stock Market’s requirements. To assist the Board in determining whether a director is independent, the Board has adopted standards for independence set forth in the Company’s corporate governance guidelines.

In determining the independence of our directors, the Board considers all relevant facts and circumstances, including, but not limited to, whether the director receives any compensation or other fees from the Company, other than the fees described under “Director Compensation”, whether the director, or an organization with which the director is affiliated or their immediate family members, has entered into any commercial, consulting, or similar contracts with the Company, and any charitable contributions the Company made to non-profit organizations with which a director nominee or their immediate family members are associated. Consistent with these considerations, the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee reviewed directors’ responses to a questionnaire asking about their relationships with the Company, as well as those of their immediate family members, and other potential conflicts of interest. The Committee determined that each of the directors currently serving on the Board and each director nominee other than Mr. Marriott and Mr. Risoleo are independent and recommended to the Board that Messrs. Bulls, Morse, Rakowich, Smith and Stein and Mmes. Baglivo and Hogan

17

Preusse have been determined to be independent. The Board approved the determination that each of the directors currently serving on the Board and each director nominees is independent other than Mr. Marriott and Mr. Risoleo. Messrs. Marriott and Risoleo are not independent because they are Company employees.

Board Leadership

Our governance framework provides the Board with the flexibility to select the appropriate leadership structure for the Company. This will be driven by the needs of the Company as well as the particular makeup of the Board at any point in time. We have historically had a leadership structure that includes a Chairman of the Board, who is annually elected, a separate Chief Executive Officer, and an independent director serving as Lead Director. The CEO is responsible for setting the strategic direction of the Company and for the day-to-day leadership and management of the Company, while the Chairman of the Board provides guidance to the CEO, directs the agenda for Board meetings, presides over meetings of the full Board and participates in stakeholder outreach. This structure reflects the continued strong leadership, industry experience and energy brought to the Board by Richard E. Marriott, who has been elected and has led the Company as Chair since its split with Marriott International in 1993. His over 50-year career at the Company provides him with a unique perspective and wealth of knowledge that is invaluable to the Board.

The Board also has the position of Lead Director who provides additional independent oversight of senior management and board matters in our current structure where the Chairman and CEO are not independent directors. The role of a Lead Director is meant to facilitate communication among the directors or between any of them and the Chairman and CEO. In addition, directors are encouraged to continue to communicate among themselves and directly with the Chairman and CEO, and under our corporate governance guidelines each independent director may call an executive session. Upon recommendation of the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee, our Lead Director is elected annually from among the independent directors. Gordon H. Smith currently serves as Lead Director.

The duties of the Lead Director include:

Another component of our leadership structure is the active role played by our independent directors in overseeing the Company’s business, both at the Board and Committee level. Six of eight of our director nominees are independent within the meaning of the rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market. Under our corporate governance guidelines, non-management directors meet in executive session without the presence of the CEO, the Chairman of the Board or other executive officers. The purpose of these sessions is to promote open discussions among the independent directors concerning the business and affairs of the Company, as well as matters concerning management, without any member of management present.

18

At least annually, the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee discusses the structure and composition of the Board of Directors and reviews the current leadership structure. This is discussed with the full Board as part of the Board’s annual evaluation to assess its effectiveness and takes into account our current business plans and long-term strategy as well as the particular makeup of the Board at that time.

The Secretary will review and forward all stockholder communications to the intended recipient except those unrelated to the duties and responsibilities of the Board, such as junk mail and mass mailings, resumes and other forms of job inquiries, surveys, new business suggestions, business solicitations or advertisements. In addition, material that is hostile, threatening, illegal or similarly unsuitable or outside the scope of Board matters or duplicative of other communications previously forwarded to the recipient will also be excluded.

How We Engage

Our stockholder and investor outreach includes investor road shows, analyst and investor meetings, investor days, property tours, and industry conferences, most of which were conducted virtually in 2021 due to the continuing effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

We also communicate with stockholders and other key stakeholders through various channels, including our annual report and SEC filings, proxy statement, news releases, Corporate Responsibility Report, investor presentations, correspondence, and our website. Our quarterly earnings conference calls are open to the public. These calls are available in real time with archived webcasts and transcripts available on our website for a period of time.

19

Stockholder Engagement and Response Process

We are committed to regular stockholder engagement so that the Board remains informed of stockholders’ perspectives and can incorporate the feedback into Board discussions and decisions. The below graphic provides an overview of our annual engagement process.

20

As mentioned above, in 2021 we continued to expand our ESG-focused engagement efforts. This engagement helped validate that our stockholders continue to be broadly supportive of Host’s governance and corporate responsibility practices and the overall philosophy, objectives, and design of our compensation program. While most investors requested meetings, several investors indicated that after reviewing our disclosure documents they did not require a meeting or have any questions or concerns. As a part of this engagement, stockholders also shared their perspectives on areas of disclosures to consider expanding in order to provide information that would be most helpful in their respective analyses of Host. Based on the feedback from our stockholders the Board took action to be directly responsive. A summary of the feedback from engagement and our response is below:

21

22

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Our Board of Directors has overall responsibility for risk oversight with a focus on the most significant risks facing the Company. Reviews of certain risk areas are conducted by the relevant committees that report on their deliberations to the Board. Risks are considered in almost all business decisions and as part of the Company’s business strategy, and oversight was especially critical as the pandemic continue to create challenges for the lodging industry and the Company

The Board recognizes that it is neither possible nor prudent to eliminate all risk. Indeed, appropriate risk-taking is essential for the Company to be competitive and to achieve its business objectives. The chart below summarizes the primary areas of risk oversight for the Board and its committees.

23

The Board and its committees implement their oversight responsibilities through management reporting processes that are designed to provide visibility to the Board about the identification, assessment and management of critical risks and management’s risk mitigation strategies. These areas of focus include strategic, operating, financial, legal, compliance and reputational risk. Management communicates routinely with the Board, its committees and individual directors on the significant risks identified through this process and how they are being managed.

Conduct and Culture

Our Board, the Culture and Compensation Committee and other Board committies play a key role in oversight of our culture, including diversity and inclusion, setting the “tone at the top” and holding management accountable for its maintenance of high ethical standards and effective policies and practices to protect our reputation, hotel properties and business. Our Board and its committees do this in a number of ways, including by:

24

Board and Management Approach to Sustainability

Through a well-established framework and cross-functional Advisory Committee with representatives from across the organization, the Company continues to incorporate sustainability into its core strategy—reflecting our belief that sustainability is essential to long-term growth. We received numerous recognitions for our Corporate Responsibility program in 2021, which are highlighted in the inside front cover of this proxy statement. We also believe in transparency, and report on our sustainability efforts in an annual Corporate Responsibility Report, which is available on our website at www.hosthoteIs.com.   ESG Oversight   The Board recognizes the importance of our sustainability initiatives and the need to provide effective oversight of those initiatives. Oversight of the Company’s policies, programs and strategies related to environmental, corporate and social responsibility matters, including human rights, human capital management, sustainability and other social and public matters, is part of the charter for the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee.

The Company’s executive vice president, human resources and corporate responsibility and executive vice president, development, design & construction provide updates to the Committee, which typically meets 3 to 4 times per year. On an annual basis, the Corporate Responsibility team presents progress against ESG targets to our CEO. Additionally, our CEO chairs the Company’s Capital Expenditure Committee and Investment Committee, which meets regularly to review and approve significant investments including those identified to support our 2025 environmental targets and responsible investment strategies.

ESG Executive Steering Committee

The Company’s ESG Executive Steering Committee provides oversight of the Company’s corporate responsibility strategy and engagement with the Board, company leadership and external stakeholders. Encompassing our environmental, social and governance focus areas, the Company’s executive vice president, human resources and corporate responsibility, and executive vice president, development, design & construction, serve as the executive sponsors, with the Company’s executive vice president, general counsel and senior vice president, investor relations also serving on the Executive Steering Committee.

Corporate Responsibility Advisory Committee

To support our Board and CEO, the Corporate Responsibility team and ESG Executive Steering Committee formally engage and convene a cross-functional Corporate Responsibility Advisory Committee representing nearly every department at the Company. Several Advisory Committee members also serve on the Company’s Capital Expenditure Committee and Investment Committee.

25

We have also established distinct responsibilities across the Company’s functional areas to execute on our responsible investment strategies. These cross-functional responsibilities include asset-level sustainability assessments, 10-year capital plans, investment decisions, return on investment validation, project management, utility management and stakeholder engagement.

Diversity and Inclusion

The Company is committed to cultivating a diverse and inclusive environment that supports the development and advancement of all. We are committed to fostering a space where we listen, learn and act; treat each other as equals; show support and respect to each other and our partners; and encourage freedom of expression and understanding of differences. We appreciate that our employees’ unique viewpoints, diverse backgrounds and experiences working together lead us to better business outcomes and we attribute this, in part, to our ongoing success.

26

The Company’s CEO has joined the CEO Action for Diversity & Inclusion initiative and personally pledged to continue to advance diversity and inclusion within our workplace. The scope of this pledge supports equity for all, including ethnically or racially diverse persons, the LGBTQ community, people with different abilities, veterans and women.

In 2020, we initiated our diversity and inclusion (D&I) programmatic efforts to begin exploring how to formally incorporate our aspirations in this area into our current people programs, culture workstreams, corporate responsibility endeavors and our employee training while also establishing and expanding on a framework for how we look at diversity and inclusion at Host and in our communities. As one of the first steps to inform Host’s long-term commitment to diversity and inclusion, we conducted a series of exercises to both listen and learn, including interviews with senior leadership and employee focus groups. We have also introduced the concept of unconscious bias via an introductory online training module with 100% employee participation. In 2021, we formally launched our diversity and inclusion program with several robust educational events, as well as celebrations to appreciate and recognize our diverse employees and communities—including the launch of a new discussion platform for employees to engage in open and honest dialogue on a variety of diversity and inclusion topics related to diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging. We also launched a new employee resource group for women and male allies within Host to foster development and networking opportunities. Additionally, we have established partnerships so that we can more directly support our Black and Brown communities and are continuing to enhance our holistic and integrated approach to charitable giving to further our support of underserved, at-risk and disadvantaged communities.

Succession Planning

The Board is actively engaged in executive talent management and succession planning. The Board reviews the Company’s “people strategy” in support of its business strategy at least annually and receives regular updates on employee engagement, diversity and retention matters. This includes a detailed discussion of the Company’s leadership bench and succession plans with a focus on key positions at the senior officer level. High potential leaders are given exposure and visibility to Board members through formal presentations and informal events.

Under the oversight of the Board, the Company’s CEO succession planning strategies have been successfully managed and implemented. When seeking a successor CEO, the Board has historically focused on internal candidates, drawing on the Company’s deep bench strength. The Company’s past three CEO’s, over a span of almost 20 years, have all come from within the organization. The Company follows the same approach with respect to other senior management positions. Both our chief financial officer, Sourav Ghosh, and corporate controller, Joseph Ottinger, were internal candidates who had each been with the Company for over 10 years and were promoted into their new roles effective September 1, 2020 and January 1, 2021, respectively. In addition, our current head of asset management, Michael Rock, senior vice president, asset management, was also an internal candidate who was promoted to that role effective March 15, 2021 after initially joining the Company in 2013.

Political Contributions Policy and Trade Association Memberships

Under the Company’s longstanding policy, Company funds may not be used to contribute to candidates, political party committees, or political action committees. Company funds also may not be used to make direct independent expenditures to support or oppose political campaigns, to contribute to “social welfare” organizations organized under Section 501(c)(4) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code or organizations organized under Section 527 of the Internal Revenue Code, or to support ballot measure committees. The Company does not have a political action committee.

27

The Company believes that participation in the public policy process is an important and essential means of enhancing stockholder value. To help us achieve this objective, the Company belongs to a number of trade associations (organized under Section 501(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code), which allows us to network, build business skills, advance our public agenda and related business goals and monitor industry policies and trends. Company participation in trade associations, including membership on a trade association board, does not mean that the Company agrees with every position a trade association takes on an issue. In fact, from time to time our positions may differ from those of the trade associations of which we are members.

The Company makes payments to these associations, including membership fees and dues. Pursuant to the Company’s code of business conduct and ethics, the Company’s legal department oversees compliance with the Company’s policy on political contributions. The Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee discusses the Company’s political spending policies and disclosures. The chart below lists organizations receiving dues and other contributions from the Company totaling $25,000 or more between 2021 and 2017. Based on each organization’s records, we have listed below the portion of Company dues and other amounts that are used by each organization for lobbying.

28

The Board has three standing committees to assist it in carrying out its responsibilities: the Audit Committee, the Culture and Compensation Committee, and the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee. The Board has adopted a written charter for each committee, all of which are available on the Company’s website at www.hosthotels.com. Copies of these charters are also available in print to stockholders upon request. See “Attendance and Voting Matters—How can I obtain copies of documents referenced in this proxy statement?” Each committee consists entirely of independent directors in accordance with The Nasdaq Stock Market rules. The composition of each committee, including the designation of committee chairs, is determined annually by the Board, based on recommendations from the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee. Assignments to committees are made based on a combination of factors, including each individual Board member’s expertise and the needs of the Company. The Board and the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee consider rotating chair and committee assignments every three to five years, taking into account, among other considerations, the benefits of continuity and experience, the desirability of new perspectives and continual education and engagement for directors, the applicable regulatory and stock exchange requirements, and the appropriate distribution of work. The Board may from time to time appoint other committees as circumstances warrant. Any new committees will have authority and responsibility as delegated by the Board.

29

Each member of the Audit Committee, in the business judgment of the Board, meets the qualifications (including independence) and financial expertise requirements of The Nasdaq Stock Market and qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of SEC rules. Our independent and internal auditors have unrestricted access to the Audit Committee. The Report of the Audit Committee appears later in this proxy statement.

30

31

Role of the Compensation Consultant

Pursuant to its charter, the Culture and Compensation Committee is authorized to engage, retain and terminate any consultant, as well as approve the consultant’s fees, scope of work and other terms of retention. Starting in 2010, the Committee retained Pay Governance LLC as its advisor. Pay Governance advises and consults with the Committee on compensation issues, compensation design and trends, and keeps the Committee apprised of regulatory, legislative, and accounting developments and competitive practices related to executive compensation. The Committee met frequently in 2020 and 2021 to consider the impacts of the pandemic on our business and the role of compensation in motivating the executive team through disruption, discuss peer practices in response to the pandemic and to make decisions to recognize management’s achievements in successfully navigating the pandemic while at the same time taking into account the adverse impact of the pandemic on stockholders and the employees of the Company’s hotel operators. Pay Governance assisted the Committee in this process and provided information on peer practices and trends. For a discussion of the Committee’s deliberations and decisions related to 2021 compensation, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2021 Compensation Results.”

Pay Governance assisted the Committee in the design, structure and implementation of the current executive compensation program, and reviews, at the direction of the Committee, compensation levels, trends and practices at least annually. Pay Governance does not determine the exact amount or form of executive compensation for any executive officers. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Our Compensation Program.” Pay Governance reports directly to the Committee, and representatives of Pay Governance, when requested, attend meetings of the Committee, are available to participate in executive sessions and communicate directly with the Committee Chair

32

or its members outside of meetings. Pay Governance has also served as a consultant retained by the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee to assist the Committee with its review of the compensation of independent directors. Pay Governance is retained by and conducts its work at the direction and request of, the Board committees. It is not retained by, and does no work directly for, the Company.

In compliance with the disclosure requirements of the SEC regarding the independence of compensation consultants, Pay Governance addressed each of the six independence factors established by the SEC with the Culture and Compensation Committee. Its responses affirmed the independence of Pay Governance on executive compensation matters. Based on this assessment, the Committee determined that the engagement of Pay Governance does not raise any conflicts of interest or similar concerns. The Committee also evaluated the independence of other outside advisors to the Committee, including outside legal counsel, considering the same independence factors and concluded that their work for the Committee does not raise any conflicts of interest.

The Culture and Compensation Committee may delegate any or all of its responsibilities to a subcommittee but did not do so in 2021. The Committee’s Report on Executive Compensation appears later in this proxy statement.

Compensation-Related Risks

The Culture and Compensation Committee oversees all of our compensation policies and practices. Management, at the request of the Committee, has assessed the Company’s compensation programs and has concluded that they do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. This risk assessment process included a review of all material compensation policies and practices, which were discussed with the Committee. The compensation programs of the Company are all centrally designed and centrally administered. The elements of compensation for senior management and upper middle management are also the same: base salary, annual cash incentive awards and long-term incentives. The performance measures for the annual cash incentive awards are (i) Company metrics that are based on an annual business plan and budget reviewed and approved by the Board and (ii) personal performance in support of the annual business plan and budget and Company strategic plan, which tie to measures of long-term success of the Company. The business plan and budget are reviewed at each Board meeting, and the strategic plan is addressed annually. Performance measures for long-term incentives are a key Company financial metric (Adjusted EBITDAre) and total stockholder return measured over a three-year period. The total achievable compensation for the year is capped at the beginning of the performance year throughout our compensation programs. The Committee reviews the compensation of executives and department heads. Further, the Committee relies upon its judgment in determining pay approaches and outcomes. Based on the foregoing, we believe our compensation policies and practices do not create inappropriate or excessive risk-taking.

34