In addition, U.S. federal
income tax law provides that a contract that purports to be a
service contract or a partnership agreement will be treated instead
as a lease of property if the contract is properly treated as such,
taking into account all relevant factors, including whether or
not:
•
the service recipient is in
physical possession of the property;
•
the service recipient controls
the property;
•
the service recipient has a
significant economic or possessory interest in the property, or
whether the property’s use is likely to be dedicated to the service
recipient for a substantial portion of the useful life of the
property, the recipient shares the risk that the property will
decline in value, the recipient shares in any appreciation in the
value of the property, the recipient shares in savings in the
property’s operating costs, or the recipient bears the risk of
damage to or loss of the property;
•
the service provider bears the
risk of substantially diminished receipts or substantially
increased expenditures if there is nonperformance under the
contract;
•
the service provider uses the
property concurrently to provide significant services to entities
unrelated to the service recipient; and
•
the total contract price
substantially exceeds the rental value of the property for the
contract period.
Since the determination of
whether a service contract should be treated as a lease is
inherently factual, the presence or absence of any single factor
will not be dispositive in every case.
We believe that
our percentage leases will be treated as true leases for U.S.
federal income tax purposes. Such belief is based, in part, on the
following facts:
•
the Partnerships, on the one
hand, and our TRSs, on the other hand, intend for their
relationship to be that of a lessor and lessee, and such
relationship is documented by lease agreements;
•
our TRSs have the right to the
exclusive possession, use, and quiet enjoyment of the hotels during
the term of the percentage leases;
•
our TRSs bear the cost of, and
are responsible for, day-to-day maintenance and repair of the
hotels and generally dictate how the hotels are operated,
maintained, and improved;
•
our TRSs bear all of the costs
and expenses of operating the hotels, including the cost of any
inventory used in their operation, during the term of
the percentage leases, other than, in certain cases, real
estate taxes;
•
our TRSs benefit from any
savings in the costs of operating the hotels during the term of
the percentage leases;
•
our TRSs generally indemnify
the Partnerships against all liabilities imposed on the
Partnerships during the term of the percentage leases by
reason of (1) injury to persons or damage to property
occurring at the hotels, (2) our TRSs’ use, management,
maintenance, or repair of the hotels, (3) any environmental
liability caused by acts or grossly negligent failures to act of
our TRSs, (4) taxes and assessments in respect of the hotels
that are the obligations of our TRSs, or (5) any breach of
the percentage leases or of any sublease of a hotel by our
TRSs;
•
our TRSs are obligated to pay,
at a minimum, substantial base rent for the period of use of the
hotels;
•
our TRSs stand to incur
substantial losses or reap substantial gains depending on how
successfully they operate the hotels;
•
the Partnerships cannot use the
hotels concurrently to provide significant services to entities
unrelated to our TRSs;
•
the total contract price under
the percentage leases does not substantially exceed the rental
value of the hotels for the term of the percentage
leases;
•
each lease, at the time we
entered into it enabled the tenant to derive a meaningful profit,
after expenses and taking into account the risks associated with
the lease, from the operation of the hotels